February 18, 2006

On Internet Morality And Career Reorganization

One reader wants to discuss the blow-back from the housing bubble. “I would like to see a general discussion on how these posters here think the housing bust will affect THEIR jobs. In my opinion, there is too much excitement about this housing downturn on this blog with the intent picking up houses for less money. If your laid off in a recession you probably won’t be buying.”

Another added, “Topic suggestion: Internet morality lectures vs. schadenfreude. My position is there is no shame left in the world and that is a bad thing. A person getting a pounded and trapped by RE and then being publicly humiliated is a lesson that will never be forgotten.”

“I will gladly take a career reorganization to have housing be in line with incomes. It has happened before it will happen again both housing and career corrections. The only people hurt will be those that don’t update their skills and are less employable. Part of the point of this blog is how to position yourself defensively so as to not be in that position.”

“If you know a storm is coming and prepare the odds are in your favor than people basing the decisions on the weather for the last couple of days.”

To which the first reader replied, “And you could do this now by moving to an area where housing is in line with incomes. The point I was trying to make is that the correction in housing prices will not occur in a vacuum and there will be residual fallout. I just think that this is somewhat overlooked on this blog because the general focus is on picking up lower priced RE. As far as being educated and keeping your skills updated to protect yourself, I couldn’t agree with you more. But if things get really bad, as in a depression, you could see 100 people applying for every one job opening even at the higher skill level. At that point your playing a numbers game and the odds aren’t in your favor.”

Reply, “I don’t predict a depression. But even in a depression I would welcome whatever happened. It would be pointless and frustrating to give internet morality lectures. If you look at it from and evolutionary biology point of view the population and relative health of the population is what matters not the individual.”

A third reader said, “Excellent point. I recall hiring for a mid-level planning position here in SCal during the last crash. Ad on Sunday. By Wed, had over 200 resumes, many VERY well qual’d. Guaranteed that we’ll have a lot of collateral damage.”

A fourth points out, “The high cost of housing is speeding up the export of jobs out of America. Why hire someone that has a 500,000 mortgage, when you can hire someone with a 30,000 mortgage in India? The cost of housing is bad for Americas ability to compete.”




RSS feed | Trackback URI

190 Comments »

Comment by vstan
2006-02-18 09:36:35

latest from sacramento

 
Comment by Gene
2006-02-18 09:44:26

I sold much of my rental portfolio this summer/fall. I am sitting with cash ready to pounce when prices drop.

Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 12:35:08

Gene- Did you consider your transaction costs? Capital Gains, depreciation recapture, possible AMT, re commissions, closing costs. And then; the low interest rates that you have given up. Your costs of acquisition and higher interest? Was it really worth it?

Comment by Gene
2006-02-18 13:30:53

Of course I considered all the expenses. I usually buy for 20 to 50% below market value so many times I sell within days and make very large profits.

Right now capital gains is cheap. Its a great time to sell.

Comment by Gene
2006-02-18 13:54:27

Just to clarify…Capital gains is cheap - but only on properties that I owned for over a year.

Properties that are turned over fast (within days) are taxed as ordinary income….OUCH. But many times its worth it…just to get in and out and make some quick money.

When the market was looking like it was topping out this summer, I did not want to hold for long periods of time…I resold just below retail so I was not exposed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 13:57:57

BTW- selling within days does not give you capital gains treatment and, from what you have said, your profits would be considered ordinary income by the IRS>

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Gene
2006-02-18 15:03:13

Yes, I said that in my follow up post.

 
 
 
 
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 12:40:24

BTW- I kept my entire portfolio and merely obtained equity lines on all so I’ll be ready to buy if some great deals come up. Meanwhile keep travelling down that amort. schedule and let my tenants pay off the mortgages.

Comment by feepness
2006-02-18 13:07:13

Same tactic I’m using. It is slightly more risky but the rewards can be far greater. I love my under 6% mortgages!

Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 13:16:14

I like your thinking feepness. Past posts have been my thoughts exactly.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Gene
2006-02-18 13:33:42

I have a couple properties that I have kept because they have great cashflow and I have future plans with the particular properties.

Overall I prefer to buy low and sell high. I don’t like owning and managing properties. I only do it when the rewards justify it.

Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 13:55:14

I am long-term. So we have different objectives. I really don’t need or want gains from quick sales. It is more of a wealth building operation for me. I only buy if it is a terrific deal and only sell (via 1031) if I have to to get the new deal. Even then, I sell my least performing/most pain in the *** properties.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by feepness
2006-02-18 21:08:22

Yeah, the wealth in the properties will likely simply pass onto my children. Step-up in cost basis baby…

That’s assuming the proletariat hasn’t put us all up against the wall by then.

 
 
 
Comment by Rich
2006-02-18 14:43:15

I reached a point with my rentals that selling them was a “no brainer” (I just love the when the “no brainer” is used in articles about people buying.

The cash I put in the bank from my sales would have taken greater than 10 years to obtain throught my rents. This seemed like a very sad situation. I started to focus on the opprotunity cost associated with leaving that potential cash tied up in my RE. My cash from the sales were put into mainly mining stocks (gg, bvn) and insurance companies (tchc, gnw). My returns have been greater than 40%/year with no tennant issues =).

I have not a regret and will be glad to sip coffe on a cold December morning in front of the courthouse in 08′-09′ to buy them back for less than I sold them for.

BTW I sold them in 02′-03′ and missed a huge move, no problem with that. I have more money in the bank than I ever thought possible and in 10 years as we pull into the next bubble I will never have to work again.

Comment by mo
2006-02-18 15:06:56

rich,

since you’re so familiar with this whole situation, why not use a portion of your money to buy puts on housing and mortgage related companies. It seems to me someone with your level of knowledge could make so much more profit during the down-leg, while waiting for the day in court in 08-09

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by feepness
2006-02-18 21:11:23

Hard to tell if you’re being smug or not.

Anyone that thinks they have perfect foresight is doomed to losses. Rich admitted he lost two years of gains, but how was he to be sure August ‘05 was the top?

His strategy is playing it safe. Buying large amounts of puts would be equivalent to “doubling” down.

I am dabbling in that myself, but nothing more.

 
Comment by mo
2006-02-19 11:15:01

smug? no… i don’t even know rich, i just joined this blog days ago. It’s just that I see Rich knows his stuff and I’m comparing the return on investment in haveing money tied up in real estate or sitting in cash, vs. that of put options on related companies.

Let me point out: I do not advocate throwing one’s money on puts all at once. You “average into them” because, as you say, no one can predict the timing on the crash with any certainty.

Also, my post was meant for everyone. I just directed it at Rich because he seems particularily smart and knowledgable, having the ‘inside look’ of a realtor. Did not mean to be smug in any way, sorry if that’s how it came off…

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by SB BubbleBeliever
2006-02-18 09:46:08

There is no doubt in my mind that EVERYONE will be affected by the housing bust that is currently under way.

And I have mixed emotions about it…

Admittedly, on one hand I am somewhat enthusiastic that the bubble is popping all across the nation- because it is putting an end to what I think has been somewhat of a “Get Rich Quick” PONZI scheme…

What I mean by that is that a very large amount of DICK and JANES across the country found a LOOPHOLE in our system that allowed them to aggressively borrow money at virtually no cost… only to FLIP and make easy profits.

I am all for entrepenurialship, but it really got wildly out of hand- and at the expense of average American people that are just trying to make a nice life for themselves.

Although I am cheerleading for a CORRECTION in housing prices… it is only because I believe they are currently out of whack to the traditional ratio’s of what housing “used to” cost, and should cost.

On the flip side… this major downturn is going to HURT all of us in some way or another. This (once) easy and available money also allowed people to feel “rich”, and many of them took the liberty to purchase all the periphery items… cars, vacations, home remodels, whatever.

This nationwide phenomenon was fantastic for America’s economy and provided jobs and all sorts of good stuff for the general public- as a whole.

In a nutshell, this HOUSING BUBBLE was really BAD and really GOOD for the above mentioned reasons.

Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 12:10:56

If Dick and Jane got out there and made some money, well good for them. We do live in a capitalist society. Way too much jealousy and sour grapes about housing prices. No one forced anyone to buy or NOT buy. Gleefully hoping for economic ruin for homeowners, whether investors or occupants is foolish from an overall economic standpoint and just plain immature,

Comment by Doug
2006-02-18 12:25:43

People short the stock market all the time. I do not think that the people that short the market are rooting for it to go up and if they win..someone else loses. I don’t see people upset about that, so I don’t see why you have a problem with people discussing their position in the RE market.

 
Comment by SB BubbleBeliever
2006-02-18 17:28:11

Dear VA Investor,

In my opinion, your comments up and down this blog (currently at 118 posts total) have revealed the true transparency of your “investor” position in the current downturn in RE. You are fighting with everyone you can, which tells me that you are a whole lot nervous about what is happening. My take on your personal situation is that you are way over your head and you know it. Why else would you have the need to lash out at anyone that might suggest that the market is turning?

Just an FYI: I would be happy to compare “financial status” any day… your blowhard claims throughout this chain of posts smell of BS.

Lastly, be careful how you decide who “is jealous or has sour grapes”… it may be the person that bails you out when you become another statistic of the “FB” genre. Cash is King, and being leveraged to the max does not make you “Rich”

p.s. you should spend some of your newfound “paper wealth” on some ANGER MANAGEMENT classes :)

Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 18:17:38

Thanks for the advice SB. I don’t think I ever claimed that we are not in a market correction. I have been anticipating it since 2001.

I don’t consider 8 figure real estate holdings with an overall LTV of 20% being levered to the max. We also have plenty of other assets and quite a substantial income (top 3%).

So I don’t think I will need anyone to bail me out. Hope this doesn’t upset you. So, what is your “financial status”?

How does calling myself VA Investor make you think I am trying to conceal my leanings?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SB BubbleBeliever
2006-02-18 19:13:30

A lot of wealthy people I KNOW…

Don’t have to brag about it over an ANONYMOUS Blog, or any other way- for that matter.

But I do wish you well on your “investments” :)

 
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 19:23:08

You questioned my financial vulnerability and implied a related bias in my remarks. So you said you would compare F.S.’s anytime. Well? No need.

Thanks for you good wishes.

 
Comment by SB BubbleBeliever
2006-02-19 11:16:42

VA Investor writes:

“I don’t consider 8 figure real estate holdings with an overall LTV of 20% being levered to the max. We also have plenty of other assets and quite a substantial income (top 3%).”

I would like to call a TRUCE on this thread…

The POINT I WAS MAKING was only to being careful who you THINK has jealousy or sour grapes was this:

Just because someone is cheering for a correction in the market doesnt mean that they “missed the boat” or are “chicken” to have entered the market in the first place.

Some cheer for a true CORRECTION so that housing can become a reality again for those that don’t have a home to call their own. This is a perfectly sensible thing to wish for! OTHERS may have been investors all along, but were lucky enough to JUMP SHIP when the going was good, and now root for a correction so that they can pick up “EASY MONEY” when buying “low” at the end of the market correction.

So tit for tat… you “tease” those that you THINK didn’t have the balls to enter the market prior to the big price increases- and now some are “teasing” YOU for still being leveraged in a market that is tanking. What’s the difference? Are either of us more “MORAL”? I don’t think so!

Also, regarding the pissing match on comparing finances… I have to chuckle that you would even “go there” and take the bait on my online challenge- as we all know that anonymous entries on blogs mean nothing.

IN OTHER WORDS… if your “top 3% income” claim is really TRUE, then God Bless You… you truly are wealthy! You’ve probably run in to Warren Buffet or Bill Gates on lunch functions in VA, from time to time.

Your stats also suggest that you are wealthier than me and all the combined incomes of fellow bloggers!
(But then again… maybe you meant that you are “top 3% income” of 5 or 6 realtors at local no-name realty branch in the middle of a hick town in VA…)

ANOTHER FUN FACT to know and tell: I can POSE as a wealthy “challenger” and in reality may not even have 2 nickels to rub together :)
(i.e. don’t cops pose as 13 yr. old girls to catch the bad guys online???)

LASTLY, I DO WISH YOU WELL… I was only commenting on the “perceived” DEFENSIVENESS of most of your POSTS on this thread. MOST wealthy people I know (that are in control of their finances) just quietly + calmly strategize and SMILE through the ups and downs of market trends… and don’t badger or tease those that are hopeful in owning a home one day.

So no hard feelings… I DO wish you well.

 
Comment by Doug
2006-02-19 12:03:12

I don’t think that 20% LTV is such a great place to be at this time. If you had been preparing for this since 2001, and with real estate prices increasing rapidly, you could have easily had a higher than 20% LTV.

 
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-19 15:00:08

SB - Truce and I wish you well.

My problem was never with agreeing that we are in a down cycle. I was just mystified that anyone would revel in the pain of others- whether financial, physical or emotional. I searched for a reason and could only come up with envy. End of story. No agenda.

note to Doug: 20%LTV equals 80% Equity.

 
Comment by SB BubbleBeliever
2006-02-19 15:57:22

VA Investor,

Fair enough. My take on all of this is (UNFORTUNATELY) whatever side we find ourselves- it is natural, or at least “human nature” to ROOT for whatever side will selfishly improve one’s life.

In other words, those that are INVESTED… cheer for prices to go up as fast as they possibly can. Those that are not currently invested (whether first time, hopeful wanna be buyers OR investors that luckily got out when it was good) are cheering for prices to CORRECT.

Whatever CYCLE we are currently in, there is discomfort for the “other side”. If one is wanting to own a home one day, it is extremely painful to see prices skyrocket and those that are in it bragging about how smart they are, or how much money they are making.

Conversely, investors that might have got caught off guard with the almost overnight change in the market are sensitive to anyone that is cheering and cajoling a meltdown.

It does sound like you have done well for yourself and I do hope the best for you. I believe these blogs naturally have a competitive side to posting one’s thoughts/wishes/hopes/plans so I don’t think the “banter” will ever turn in to a MUTUAL ADMIRATION SOCIETY.

THAT said, TRUCE accepted :)

 
 
 
 
Comment by Lou Minatti
2006-02-18 13:57:37

Do we know for sure that the bursting of the housing bubble will be bad for the economy as a whole? IIRC, even though housing prices were declining and the idiots were burnt in the early 1980s and then again in the early 1990s, the national economy was doing OK. Reagan was reelected during price declines, as was Clinton. If the economy was horrible during those periods they wouldn’t have been reelected. Presidential elections come down to pocketbook issues.

Comment by tj & the bear
2006-02-18 14:14:40

Lou,

After all the time you’ve been here and all the economic data that’s been presented on this blog, I don’t know you could even ask that question.

Repeat after me… “Real Estate isthe economy!”.

 
Comment by dawnal
2006-02-18 15:53:09

There is an important difference with the current bubble. Rising house prices have allowed consumers to tap their growing equity to maintain a high level of consumption. Historically, our economy has been driven by consumption. Until recently, consumption constituted 2/3 of the GDP. Since the bubble, it has risen to over 70%. When prices fall significantly, home owners will no longer be able to use their house as an ATM. They will cut their consumption and when a 70% piece of the economy is on the skids, we are in for a truly tough time throughout the economy. When consumption sinks generally, all boats will drop in the water, whether you are connected with the housing industry or not.

We are headed into another Great Depression similar to the 30’s and there is nothing the FED or Congress can do to avoid it. You can prepare by paying off as much debt as possible and buy gold/silver in some form. This is not a time to be adventurous. Try not to own real estate, of course.

Comment by Silverback1011
2006-02-18 17:43:53

I think that having some real estate is permissible in a downturn/depression scenario if you have adequate cash to cover your mortgage at any time, and/or it is extremely profitable. We have our residential house, which has a mortgage on it which we could pay off cash any time with savings, and one paid-for home worth more than the one we live in by far, with a 34 month lease on it….the couple living in it have rental assistance from their foreign company. We would be nuts to sell the rental house when it is making so much money.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Silverback1011
2006-02-18 17:53:13

I tried to add a comment before to this — hopefully this time it will take. I think that it is permissible to own some real estate during a severe downturn if you have adequate cash to pay it off….we have our own residence which has a mortgage on it we can easily pay off if necessary from our savings, and one paid-for rental which as a 34-month lease on it. The couple renting it has a subsidy from the foreign firm he works for. Right now, it’s a cash cow, and we would be nuts to sell it. That being said, we are investing in gold and diamonds as well.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by feepness
2006-02-18 21:13:39

Presidential elections come down to pocketbook issues.

So that’s how FDR got relected!

 
 
Comment by peterbob
2006-02-18 15:48:53

A housing bubble is bad for economic efficiency. Resources get directed away from other areas to real estate: job growth increases in real estate, construction companies make money, and people start buying houses, etc. But this happens because people are all excited about rising house prices. But in a bubble, demand rises BECAUSE PEOPLE BELIEVE PRICES WILL RISE. Prices don’t raise for fundamental reasons. So in the end, you have too many people involved in real estate.

It doesn’t really matter too much that some people made a killing and others will now be left holding the bag. That’s just a redistribution of wealth.

One other potential problem which may be BIG is the potential for wasteful government intervention. If congress feels sympathetic with homebuyers who just bought the American Nightmare, and have negative equity, and if foreclosures rise, then they may raise taxes to help all the poor homeowners left holding the bag. It is my sincere wish that this doesn’t happen, because this would be truly costly.

Comment by SB BubbleBeliever
2006-02-18 17:58:01

Peterbob,

I COULDN”T AGREE WITH YOU MORE. WELL SAID!!!!!!!

SB BB

 
 
Comment by ocrenter
2006-02-19 06:16:13

the current housing bubble is literally a form of MLM (multi-level-marketing), or pyramid scheme. If you go thru the Extreme Flippers series on my blog, what you’ll see if flippers sell to each other, and flippers use each other as realtors, and all flippers seem to know each other. The idea is the first flipper sells the home to the second flipper for a $100,000 profit. But teaches the second flipper to hold for a few month for another $100,000 gain and be a mentor/realtor for that second flipper. The idea is then that the second flipper will sell to the third and so on. How is this not MLM?

 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2006-02-18 09:48:16

Having lived through a RE bust, this is why I am hoping for a quick, sharp reversal. It will be much more economically painful if we go through a five-year plus correction.

Last spring, I answered a comment about folks that were cheering the correction. I pointed out that the commentor wasn’t in someones face; that many readers have been bullied by peers for years about ‘losing out’ and being ‘priced out forever’ and were probably just blowing off steam.

BTW, where were the morality police when ‘chicken little’ renters were told they would never own a home?

Comment by Pata Nahin
2006-02-18 10:45:14

Please can you describe why a “quick, sharp reversal” will be much less painful than if there is a “five-year plus correction”.

Thanks in advance for your insights.

Comment by Ben Jones
2006-02-18 11:08:38

I assume that prices are going to get back in line with rents and histroical averages. The drawn-out experience in 1980’s Texas and other oil states made doing business very uncertain and listless for many years. If nothing else, paying inflated property taxes and interest for years is a waste. Like the guy said in the article yesterday, if you’re going to default, better to get it over with than struggle for three years and then go belly up.

 
Comment by feepness
2006-02-18 13:12:02

Or to be even simpler:

When money is misallocated productivity suffers as useful avenues of investment are not taken.

The sooner this is corrected the sooner the correctly allocated productivity can compound into a stronger future for everyone.

With the one caveat that there is the line in which too much confidence is lost too quickly and we have a general (depression level) panic. That would cause more misallocation.

 
 
Comment by mtnrunner2
2006-02-18 11:21:49

I would have defended a renter, too. I wasn’t reading blogs until recently, so you didn’t hear from me then. I would have sympathized for renters, who couldn’t come up with the ridiculous amount of money needed to buy a home. We were fortunate, in that we bought a house in early 2000. What about the college students who graduated after 2000, or those who came from low-cost areas to CA and had to buy a median priced home with only $40K made on the sale of their house in Kansas? I feel empathy for all the renters who missed out on the greatest housing boom in history, because they weren’t there at the right time.

I understand about blowing off steam. I guess those who are frustrated only need to go back to those who looked down on them for renting, and can now say, “See, I was right!”

Comment by feepness
2006-02-18 13:13:29

Yeah, all the smug bastards pissed me off… and I did very well in the boom. But someone who thinks they are a genius because they purchased a house in 1999 needs to be slapped. I have good friends in the same economic situation who cannot afford to buy. That is wrong.

 
 
 
Comment by Pat
2006-02-18 09:51:55

I believe it was J.P. Morgan who had returned from a trip abroad in the 1930’s, and asked by a reporter what he thought of the Depression overtaking America Morgan replied, “What depression?”

Somewhat in line with Mr Morgan’s comment, the effects of the coming down cycle will not effect all persons equally. And some it will benefit.

Unfortunately, “homes” themselves are merely the tip of the iceberg in that residential real estate has a very deep, broad base, much of which is not readily obvious.

To think one will not be affected at all in a personal way, one would have to be truly above the frey, both in terms of means and perhaps morality. Who, after all, will not have a loved one or friends who will be affected?

We can, unfortunately, rely on human nature. They surely had warning that Katrina was coming in New Orleans and look at how disasterously that has played out. They knew about the possibility for 70 years and did nothing to fortify the levees, but instead allowed the monies allocated for such to be squandered by a corrupt levee board.

Even now, New Orleans is more interested in Mardi Gras and building up tourism and dividing the “spoils” instead of focusing on the fact that yet another hurricane season is but months away.

They are not prepared, and forecasters agree that we are in a very nasty weather cycle for some years to come.

How quickly people forget, even when reminded on a daily basis.

Comment by grubner
2006-02-18 10:05:39

John Pierpont Morgan (1837-1913)

 
 
Comment by viral smile
2006-02-18 09:52:44

Schadenfreude is too mild for how I feel as a responsible renter. To wit, Psalms 55:15

“Let death seize upon them, and let them go down quick into hell: for wickedness is in their dwellings, and among them.”

PRAISE JEEBUS

 
Comment by jeffolie
2006-02-18 09:54:09

Schumpeterian creative destructionism

Creative Destructionism
One of my favorite economist, Josef Schumpeter, described recessions as periods of CREATIVE DESTRUCTION. This was part of his explanation for the Great Depression.

As the economy grows, and confidence increases, it becomes easier to splurge on items that we don’t necessarily need. We may even take on extra debt to do this. This is also true for business. Some of these excesses are not useful and we are better of without them. Did I really need that new fishing pole? Do you really need …? Do we need another corner store? Does the nation really need …? In the early 1990s, it was hotels and office space. In the mid 1970s, it was energy intensive plants and automobiles (In 1997, the average person used about the same volume of gasoline a year as in 1974).
During economic downturns, the excesses are eliminated. Businesses tear down, sell cheap, or otherwise charge off unproductive resources becoming “lean and mean.” How long this process takes, is the significant factor in the length of a recession according to Schumpeter. There were many excesses built up from the “Roaring 20’s” that had to be eliminated (there was also a natural disaster creating the dust bowl).

Proponents of Schumpeter argue that in today’s highly competitive, fast changing environment, business are less likely to create excesses and eliminate them much more quickly when they do. Many firms will contract work rather than build marginally productive facilities. Still, there will be some and the next recession will occur when too many are being destroyed at one time say the Schumpeterians. The excess manufacturing capacity has been created in China and other overseas sites.

What excess is being created now that could lead to the next downturn? I can’t help but look at the housing bubble, stock market, gold (at 25 year highs) and commodities.

 
Comment by S - crow
2006-02-18 09:54:42

In this Sunday’s Seattle Times report, Lawrence Yun, senior economist for the National Association of Realtors says that the Seattle region my experience a 30-40% increase in median prices over the next two years.

Median price in King County (Seattle area-Bellevue & vicinity) is currently hovering around $400,000. Snohomish County median prices hovering around $320K. I can’t imagine another 30-40% increase, within two years. This is getting absurd.

http://www.Washington-realestate.blogspot.com

Comment by arlingtonva
2006-02-18 12:04:05

Lawrence Yun had this to say about D.C. 5 months ago: The chance of a housing price decline in the DC area is close to zero

http://nvar.com/newsdetail.lasso?articleno=nvarn100608

He has a Phd from the University of Maryland. This proves education does not equal intelligence and/or high titles don’t match high morality.
I feel sorry for a first time home buyer that hears a Phd/Sr Analysts talk about huge gains, and then ends up with a ton of debt.

Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 12:51:55

Remind me not to send my kid to Maryland.

 
 
Comment by incessant_din
2006-02-18 13:00:44

Not sure if this affects other people’s browsers, but the open code tag above screws up the font for me. I’ll try closing it.

Comment by Pata Nahin
2006-02-18 15:50:23

Yup, I have the font problem too.

 
 
 
Comment by nnvmtgbrkr
2006-02-18 09:55:17

As a mortgage broker, I know the party is over. But, I’ve seen this coming for some time now. I’m concerned, but not sweating it out. Why? My wife and I knew this would end, and most likely end bad. Unlike everyone else in my industry, we’ve spent the last few years living as simply as we could and saving like there’s no tomorrow. Both of our vehicles are paid off late 90’s model vehicles (I’ve been heckled many times for being a business owner that drives an old truck.) Absolutly no debt (which includes no mortgages since last property was sold Oct ‘06….yes, I’m officially a renter now) Because of all this, I can stand a long time without worrying about where the next dollar is coming from. The point I’m making is this - Simplfy & Save! I know this sounds very un-American, but if you plan on surviving this mess, the advice is sound. Start doing it today, for tomorrow may be too late.

Comment by Vmaxer
2006-02-18 16:21:59

Saving is definately not un-american. Hard work and saving built this country.
It’s just become forgotten. Unfortunately, it takes hard economic times to remind people of this.

 
 
Comment by bubble_contagion
2006-02-18 10:00:07

I work for big oil so times couldn’t be better. Stock through the roof, projects lined up pass 2007. 70% of sales are exports; almost none are in San Diego where the company is located.

The housing bubble has caused loss of American jobs, not due to outsourcing but rather to not be able to hire US citizens. Even with competitive salaries, experienced engineers would not relocate to San Diego due to housing costs. Most recent hires have been foreigners that, even renting, are better off than India, Romania, etc.

Comment by mtnrunner2
2006-02-18 11:26:59

Qualcomm has 500 openings they cannot fill in San Diego, because the high housing costs keeps people from coming here. This was in a SD Union-Tribune article a month or two ago. In a few years, after housing prices plummet, people will again move here and hiring in those industries can pick up, assuming the demand is there during the recession.

Comment by bubble_contagion
2006-02-18 14:30:29

A lot of those positions are phony. We do the same thing. We are always “hiring” so people send their resume and, if we really need someone, we have a head start. There are some positions, like scientists and highly qualified engineers that are always open in case someone from the competition wants to jump ship. Search in Monster, Qualcomm has only 35 job openings listed. These are the positions they are actively searching for.

 
 
 
Comment by DC Bubble
2006-02-18 10:21:34

The dc market is unique. Employees are somewhat insulated from economic downturns and upturns. The federal government as a percentage is a very large employer. That said, the buyers at the higher end of the market are like those elsewhere so a downturn in the housing market or a general recession will hurt those with the deepest pockets

http://www.dcbubble.blogspot.com

Comment by crispy&cole
2006-02-18 10:24:00

The dc market is unique.

______________________

LOL

Comment by NOVA fence sitter
2006-02-18 10:37:49

DC is unique but not immune. Also, I’m worried about the budget. At some point there will have to be cuts and it will hurt the DC region. Probably won’t happen until W leaves office but it will happen.

 
 
Comment by bottomfisherman
2006-02-18 10:51:27

Yep, there is a RE bubble, but here in ______. ;-)

 
Comment by bottomfisherman
2006-02-18 10:52:27

Yep, there is a RE bubble, but NOT here in _______. ;-)

 
Comment by Spunkmeyer
2006-02-18 11:58:48

I have to say, I think that’s rubbish. The issue is the exotic loans people have had to take out to even buy a home in the DC area… and when those ARMs readjust, a lot of people will be hurting…

 
Comment by arlingtonva
2006-02-18 12:07:14

Everyone believes D.C. is different hence the herd mentality.

 
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 12:19:34

Those with the deepest pockets are most insulated from any type of downturn BECAUSE their pockets are also full of cash.

 
Comment by doug_home
2006-02-18 12:23:19

I work for the US Dept of Energy, Lots of pink slips last year, and even more this year

 
 
Comment by IE fencesitter
2006-02-18 10:25:45

I have been a government attorney for 5 years since graduating from law school. Even though the economy has been sound the last few years, the Republican leadership both in my state of California and federally have made it so that I have faced two major lay-off scares in that time, and the Budget Reconciliation Act that just passed cuts another $90 million from our department to fund the Iraq War, so I may face that threat again very soon. Getting laid off from a government job is almost unheard of, that is one reaosn I took this route, but with the Republicans refusal to raise taxes on corporations or the wealthy, and their preference for shrinking government programs, this is the current reality. If the economy takes a major blow and the tax revenue dries up, I can only imagine how that will impact my career.

That being said, I will admit that I am privately hoping many acquaintances I know take it in the shorts, if nothing else but to teach them a lesson. One guy I know is a mortgage broker with all the toys, $1.5 million home, hummer h2, E class benz, trophy wife, limos every weekend, etc. This would all be fine except he got it by taking advantage of unsophisticated borrowers, mortgaging his own home to the point where he is upside down and using the money to buy all these toys, take extravagant trips and build himself a $100,000 marble and leather office. Now his mortgage business is hurting so bad his trophy wife is leaving him and he is facing possible bankruptcy. I know a few others just like this guy, who were so smug, arrogant and condescending that they truly deserve a “correction” of their own. Trying to warn these guys always got a patronizing smile, like an owner patting their puppy on the head. I’ll admit I will relish the time when the tables are turned.

Comment by crispy&cole
2006-02-18 11:00:08

I know several folks like that and unfortunately I will enjoy dancing on their graves!

 
Comment by sm_landlord
2006-02-18 11:02:19

“If the economy takes a major blow and the tax revenue dries up, I can only imagine how that will impact my career.”/i>

Have you considered setting up a bankruptcy practice? :-)

Comment by sm_landlord
2006-02-18 11:04:43

trying to close a tag. Man, I miss preview….

 
 
Comment by bottomfisherman
2006-02-18 11:14:19

If tax revenues dry up, W will just borrow more from the Chinese.

 
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 12:50:35

Just major jealousy. It would not matter if his money was from housing, dot coms, or enron. You will never be happy if your happiness depends on being more successful financially than all your friends. Unless, of course you hang-out with the wino’s on skid row.

Comment by crispy&cole
2006-02-18 12:59:38

I’m not jealous in the least. I have a good life, a great wife, two great kids, a nice home and a boat load of investments.
A siginificant number of these RE people have taken advantage and screwed over the sheeple. AND I cant wait for them to get what they have been giving!!

Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 13:06:52

Don’t you understand that it’s the sheeple who will be screwed if you crash cravers get your wish. Middle and low income people will pay the price.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by crispy&cole
2006-02-18 13:08:54

I doenst matter what we wish for! I cant make this thing crash! No one has that power. Well maybe Dick Cheney (jk). This thing will go up or down no matter what I wish for!

 
Comment by Tomr123
2006-02-18 15:24:01

Va_investor, I like your optimism, but even you must admit that the market is due for a correction. It’s not something we hope or want to happen, but it MUST happen. That is one of the traits of a fre market society.

Look at this quote right here. It has CORRECTION writtne all over it.

A fourth points out, “The high cost of housing is speeding up the export of jobs out of America. Why hire someone that has a 500,000 mortgage, when you can hire someone with a 30,000 mortgage in India? The cost of housing is bad for Americas ability to compete.”

 
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 16:04:51

I don’t see any optimism in my remarks. I am just attempting to dispel the notion that only one certain segment is to blame and will be hurt. Many non-owners are just plain envious - what more can I say?

 
Comment by Tom
2006-02-18 16:43:15

Some are envious that they didn’t catch the wave, but on the other side you have those who think nothing will ever go down and that 100k in equity is “Free money”.

 
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 17:06:45

So, um, what’s your point?

 
Comment by eastcoaster
2006-02-19 06:08:08

Some are envious that they didn’t catch the wave, but on the other side you have those who think nothing will ever go down and that 100k in equity is “Free money”.

His point, I think, matches my thoughts. You spout off about how renters are just jealous they missed the boat. (Truth be told, some of us renters TRIED to catch the boat ~ but couldn’t win any bidding wars and gave up when prices spiraled out of control ~ my own personal story.)

Anyway, you seem to cheerlead those who made the boat. But so many of them not only now have a house, but enormous debt by borrowing against that precious home. They’ve used their homes as piggybanks and, while it’s certainly their prerogative to do so, will be pissing and moaning when their property values go down. Well no one told them to take all that money out! And how can they not understand BEFORE taking the money out that they have to pay it back! I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard people bragging about all the extra money they now have and I’m puzzled because they never speak of paying it back!

Anyway, THEY are the ones I’ll feel sorry for after a correction (or bust, or implosion! whichever happens). And the poor renters who you have belittled will quite possibly be able to get on that elusive boat finally. (Especially renters like me who are debt-free and have a fair amount of savings ~ no, not the tycoon you claim to be ~ just a simple, single mom in a fairly decent financial position ~ but only IF and WHEN home prices fall back into line.)

 
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-19 15:14:52

My intent was never to belittle renters. Just to try to understand where all the anger and hatred over the housing situation was coming from. Read the posts. Why do so many people want to laugh and cheer the personal suffering of others.

 
Comment by HOZ
2006-02-19 21:11:55

If you have ever seen friends that were not participants side swiped by a bubble (even a small bubble like the dotcoms) then you should be in absolute terror of this bubble collapse. The long term damage from a 10% drop in real estate affects everyone. What good does it do to have 400K sitting in a bank when you have lost your job and the currency is devalued. It is the easiest way for the government to restrict imports and improve exports. The government did it in 1986 (a 5% devaluation) that roiled currency and agricultural markets. IMHO what made survival in the great depression possible was the vast number of families that still had relatives living on the farm. In 1932 my grandfather donated a high rise in Chicago to the University of Chicago to avoid paying property taxes - he could not get anyone to buy it. Check your frat and sorority houses at your universities he was not the only donor of realestate to avoid taxes. I am very concerned that this bubble collapse will do more damage than the great depression. We are leveraged as never before.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Miami_med
2006-02-18 16:56:02

Why is it that the government should never shrink? Excessive government intervention into the economy has had a large and hidden impact on this bubble. Maybe some cuts wouldn’t be too bad after all. Maybe we do spend excessively on Iraq, but that doesn’t mean that they should raise taxes on productive and successful people so that the government can higher more lawyers.

 
 
Comment by The Hopper
2006-02-18 10:33:52

Several years ago, we moved out of the luxury goods business. Part of it was due to increased specialty tax in CA, but part was also due to the decrease in sales after the dot-com bust. We knew it couldn’t go on forever and so took our savings and spent a year doing charity work. Several months ago, my husband and his business partner started a high-tech recruiting firm. As more and more people are forced to change employment sectors, it leads to more applicants fot the same position and companies without a HR department need help sifting through resumes and finding qualified candidates in the area. Like the previous post about engineers in San Diego, we’ve found most of the people we place are foreign born. While the salaries are good, they’re not enough to own a place here in Orange County, but immigrants have the advantage of being willing to live below local standards while doing much better than if they had stayed in their native countries.

One other thing– if things were to get really bad, how many of you know how to grow vegetables, mend your clothing, and even hunt or raise animals? I don’t anticipate it being totally necessary, but it is sure nice to know that I can sew, plant a garden, raise chickens and other animals. This is how my great-grandparents raised their families during the depression, I know my kids won’t go hungry.

Comment by NOVA fence sitter
2006-02-18 10:41:52

God I hope it doesn’t get that bad. I’m going to rent a couple of Madmax movies in order to prepare myself. I”ll probably start stocking up on soap and cigarettes to use as currency too.

Comment by crispy&cole
2006-02-18 10:46:27

This seems a bit extreme to me. My prediction is for a significant slowdown in RE related employment. Those that have skills will find other work. I think our economy will slow to 1-2 % GDP and things will be tough for those who haved lived beyond their means, however, those who have a cushion and are not RE dependent will do just fine and not have to resort to hunting (ie Dick Cheney) and sewing. IMO.

 
Comment by grubner
2006-02-18 11:07:40

Oh man go figure, I settle down and get married, have kids just when my favorite movie comes too life!!! I better hurry up and sell the audi wagon and buy an AMX or what ever MadMax drove in the original movie and head down Anarchy Road. Wooo woooo.
Opps I got to go wash the dishes now.

PS After the first one all of the subsequent M M movies were poseurs.

PSS. After having done disaster relief, Disp. Diapers will be worth a fortune in the post Apocalypse world.

Comment by ajh
2006-02-18 17:21:00

AMX? Go wash your mouth out with soap :(.

Max Rockatansky drove a Ford Falcon Hardtop with a supercharged 351 Cleveland in Mad Max 1.

(I understand the Falcon name might be a bit of a joke in the US. Let me assure you that is not the case here. Ford Australia kept the name going and from 1967 onwards the cars were designed locally. Falcons are still manufactured today and you can still get a V8.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by grubner
2006-02-19 07:38:14
 
 
 
Comment by Unkown Attorney
2006-02-18 12:35:21

…and don’t forget nylons and Hershey bars too.

 
Comment by Doug
2006-02-18 12:43:33

In order to be prepared, I have been stockpiling gas in my living room and spare bedrooms. Your cigarettes and soap will be worthless. You really do need to rent Madmax to prepare.

Comment by baselle
2006-02-18 21:11:54

All we’ll need for you is a match, my friend.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by moqui
2006-02-18 11:14:49

unfortunetely, I think many people would resort to pilaging a walmart then waiting for federal relief. Darwin would be proven correct in short order.

 
Comment by bottomfisherman
2006-02-18 12:52:04

Anyone know where I can get a good deal on a fuel truck to park in my back yard? …..just kidding.

M. Max

Comment by ajh
2006-02-18 17:31:58

Get one of those big heating oil tanks that people use in rural areas which hold several hundred gallons. Set up out of sight in back yard. Fill with diesel (ordinary petrol is too volatile).

(Some old low-tech diesels will actually run on heating oil, but at the cost of a very smoky exhaust.)

 
 
 
Comment by realestateblues
2006-02-18 10:49:54

Can I find how to raise chickens on Google?

Comment by HOZ
2006-02-18 11:19:21

You can buy the eggs and incubator and instruction from SEARS. I do the eggs every year.

Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 12:59:32

I already have a farm (92 acres) but Lingus tells me this is a “non-farm” (?). Anyone who needs to raise chicken, grow corn etc. is welcome.

Comment by sf jack
2006-02-18 20:19:10

Funny, this definition hasn’t changed at all in the month since Lingus and I first pointed this out.

Then, as now, it says nothing about equity nomads who ruin local residents’ way of life, while still calling their “investment” a “farm” - when it certainly is not the latter.

“farm ( P ) Pronunciation Key (färm)
n.
A tract of land cultivated for the purpose of agricultural production.

A tract of land devoted to the raising and breeding of domestic animals.
An area of water devoted to the raising, breeding, or production of a specific aquatic animal: a trout farm; an oyster farm.
An area of land devoted to the storage of a commodity or the emplacement of a group of devices: a tank farm; an antenna farm.
Baseball. A minor-league club affiliated with a major-league club for the training of recruits and the maintenance of temporarily unneeded players.
Obsolete.
The system of leasing out the rights of collecting and retaining taxes in a certain district.
A district so leased. “

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 20:59:27

How do I get one of those baseball “farm” teams? I have 70 acres of trees that I am growing for mother earth (conservation easement).

 
 
 
 
Comment by Lou Minatti
2006-02-18 14:01:04

Can I find how to raise chickens on Google?

Avian influenza will likely be in the US soon so unless you plan to keep them inside a shelter this won’t be a good idea.

 
 
Comment by GH
2006-02-18 10:50:30

I am pretty sure the end result will be a much devalued dollar and all that entails. Devalued against what (Asian Currencies, Gold?) I am not sure, but we have a situation which cannot sustain, particularly when at the same time we are expected to compete with overseas workers in a big way. I’m a computer programmer who arrived in San Diego too late to take advantage of the massive runup in RE prices, but I have already been the victim on one occasion of offshoring, and in truth, while our salaries are considered good, there is little room for raises despite the higher cost of living here in San Diego.

Comment by feepness
2006-02-18 13:18:59

The unwinding of such a massive amount of debt may actually result in a much MORE valued dollar… at least initially. The amount of dollars floating around out there in relation to the amount of debt is very small and people could be scrambling for them if deflation hits.

 
 
Comment by realestateblues
2006-02-18 10:51:06

 
Comment by realestateblues
2006-02-18 10:53:56

The main reason why i think we won’t be in a recesion if housing tanks is that we’ll start a chicken bubble where chicken prices will go up 30% a year, everyone will be in a chicken business and it will account for 30% of all new jobs in the US between 2006 and 2009.

Comment by crispy&cole
2006-02-18 10:58:10

LMFAO!

 
Comment by Doug
2006-02-18 12:45:54

Down with the Chicken bubble. Will it pop or just deflate?

Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 13:02:55

It will probably just Hatch.

Comment by feepness
2006-02-18 13:20:07

You sure you want to go public with that prediction?

You could end up with egg on your face.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by realestateblues
2006-02-18 15:48:09

I’m walking on egg shells right now :-)

 
 
 
Comment by Tomr123
2006-02-18 15:33:28

Maybe Ben can go ahead and set up thechickenbubbleblog.com

 
 
 
Comment by jeffolie
2006-02-18 10:58:40

Exporting countries rely on countries to buy their goods. If we cannot buy, they eat the big one. Their currencies will die a horrible death.

US M3 LOOKS TAME COMPARED TO CHINA’S

February 14 – Bloomberg (Lee Spears): “China’s money supply expanded at the fastest pace in two years in January, exceeding the central bank’s official target for an eighth straight month. M2…grew 19.2 percent from a year earlier to 30.4 trillion yuan ($3.8 trillion) after expanding 17.6 percent in December, the People’s Bank of China said…”

Comment by feepness
2006-02-18 21:18:31

D-FLATION.

What goes up, must come down. And in economics it has to come down even harder.

 
 
Comment by Blissful Ignoramus
2006-02-18 11:15:27

I sold much of my rental portfolio this summer/fall. I am sitting with cash ready to pounce when prices drop.

It’s comments like this one that convince me that the bubble will slowly leak rather than pop. It seems that an awful lot of people are “ready to pounce”. I know a few people personally who are doing that in CA, and I read it here. If prices continue to drop into the spring, I think they will level off or perhaps start going up again, as the “bargain” hunters scramble to save 15% on properties that were 50% overvalued to begin with. Overall, I think most of the bubble believers are still lusting after real estate and very much want a piece of the action.

Comment by Annata
2006-02-18 12:22:59

Yeah, there are many of us who say that we’re ready to pounce. In reality, though, there will be the temptation to wait until the market has hit bottom, just as there was the temptation to wait until the market peaked. Once things get going, I expect that many of us will be more hesitant than we sound now.

Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 13:14:41

My belief is that a good number of those who have been fence-sitting the past 3 or 4 years are simply too afraid to pull the trigger. It is useless trying to time the bottom - they will still be waiting in 15 yrs. Afraid to slip-up.

Comment by Annata
2006-02-18 14:24:59

Just because it is useless to time the bottom doesn’t mean that it won’t affect the market psychology. Fence-sitters, whether afraid or not, will continue to exist or increase in numbers as the bubble pops, and I believe this will limit any dead cat bounce.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by sf jack
2006-02-18 20:22:52

I believe exactly the opposite.

Former fence sitters are going to jump in all the way through the next half decade or more. And likely before the bottom.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by bottomfisherman
2006-02-18 12:54:49

Pounce on the dead cat bounce— not!

 
Comment by Gene
2006-02-18 13:46:41

Possibly that is true for many but not for me (im the one your quoting).

I only buy way below marketvalue. If the market drops 15% over the next couple months, I would be temepted to buy….If I can find a wholesale deal that is 50% below market value!

Also I only buy properties which have great cashflow or that I have a likely quick exit.

It all non emotional to me. I have bought and sold over 50 properties. I have never lost money. The easiest money I made was actually when things were flat around here before the massive appreciation. I was constantly buying properties for 1/2 price some with owner financing and reselling for good profits fast.

I am looking forward to the bottom. Its where I know how to find the best deals.

Comment by Tom
2006-02-18 15:36:36

You keep talking about buying houses for half price. I don’t buy that. Even people who want out can sell for less and easily get the sale and not have to reduce 50% even in the worst market. Piffle, Bladerdash, pure crap.

Comment by Tom
2006-02-18 15:40:41

BALDERDASH*

I agree that you will be able to find HUGE reductions when the market does correct and hit bottom, but in the past few years, if you got 50% off then you must of pulled a gun on them or taken their chickens hostage.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Gene
2006-02-18 16:38:58

You don’t belive me because you only know retail. I work wholesale.

This summer I saw a property (mobile w/land) with a notice from the fire dept on the fence saying that they needed to clean up the yard/brush ect. I looked up the property owners name in the tax logs and wrote to her saying I would be intrested in buying her place. She called me and offered to me for 17.5k. I bought it and sold it one week later for 65k.

You can think I am making this up…I really don’t care. I do a few deals like this every year (well not usually this good).

I ONLY buy if I get properties for 30% off or more.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by boulderbo
2006-02-18 11:19:56

the mortgage industry is in for a triple whammy, declining values, tightened underwriting, limited product, no refis, no purchases, ugly. i would anticipate at 50% contraction in the 500,000 workforce at a minimum, imho.

 
Comment by NurseLiz
2006-02-18 11:45:23

Im and ICU nurse, not likely to lose my job, especially when all these speculators start jumping out windows, having strokes and heart attacks, heck i’ll be in business till i retire:)

Comment by Unkown Attorney
2006-02-18 12:38:34

I too am excited about my career prospects when the bubble pops.

 
 
Comment by auger-inn
2006-02-18 12:23:13

Well, If we are going to have a predictions thread I sure want to put in my two cents!
Housing drop will mirror image it’s ascent this past year, but for several years running. Yep, a real crash that will have to be seen to be believed. Real Estate down 20% by end of year (just the warm up folks)
Economic data will be revealed to be a giant hoax perpetrated by Greenspam and Co. to placate the masses. Figures calculated using methodology in use prior to Boskin commission (early 90’s, Clinton brainstorm) estimates inflation currently at 7.5%-8% and I expect it to keep increasing rapidly (see above blog about Yuan M3 inflation). Unemployment rate using earlier methods (which actually tried to count people out of work as opposed to people actively looking for work) at 8%-9%.
Probably a precipitating event like an attack on Iran,Terrorist Attack, Energy Crisis or Dollar Crisis/Bond Collapse/Derivatives Crisis starts the ball rolling with some large bank failures.
The remainder of 2006 will be consumed with increased unemployment, bankruptcy’s and storys about funding being pulled from Condo Projects.
Real Estate inventory will be at an all time historic level by Dec. 06
The Greatest Depression starts on scedule Jan.07 with capital controls being placed on the movement of money abroad, 401K investment mandates (gov securities only, for protection of course), trade sanctions on China/India, increasingly bellicose military deployments around sensitive shipping lanes and oil supplies.
20% unemployment by the end of 07 with monthly gains of 3-4%.
Middle Class shrinks by 10%, Dollar has lost an additional 15%.
Gas breaks 5$/gallon, Saudi Oil fields revealed to be in permanent decline and the Peak Oil theory finally pierces the collective consciousness of america.
Let’s see where was I? Oh yeah, in June of 06, the sheeple of the U.S. finally get a chance to take a whiff of the turd that the FED and White House have been busy painting for the past several years after the wind from the cheerleaders at CNBC finally dies down with the collapse of the housing market. This allows the collective masses to finally realize they are going to be indentured servants for the rest of their natural lives (trying to pay off 500K loans with interest after their pay gets cut in the recession that has already started, or downsized/outsourced) to the banking institution (you know, the private banking families, the ones who were given a tax free franchise back in 1913 to print money up from thin air and charge interest on it). This all leads to widespread civil disobedience in cities throughout the country, which leads to large scale internment in the camps recently built by KBR (a subsidiary of Haliburton, who just received a “no bid” award for an open ended contract to build large internment camps around the U.S. Of course the reason given for these camps was for an unidentified “immigration emergency”, like folks will be swarming into the U.S. when it turns into a ghetto and the money is worthless. Funny we didn’t see this news being covered in the main stream media)
At any rate, you get my drift. Anyone with money set aside to buy Real Estate better pack a lunch, it is a long way to the bottom of this market. It’ll be tough to figure a “Cap Rate” when the national income is falling like a rock along side house prices.

Comment by Dreaming 07
2006-02-18 13:05:58

Real estate inventory is already at an all-time historic level (I think I remember reading that ;) ) so we are 10 months ahead of schedule.

 
Comment by argentinian_seller
2006-02-18 14:11:03

Figures calculated using methodology in use prior to Boskin commission (early 90’s, Clinton brainstorm) estimates inflation currently at 7.5%-8%

Is there a website that tries to calculate this? Do you know?

Comment by auger-inn
2006-02-18 14:48:22

I’ll try to get it for you. It is called “shadow government statistics” run by a couple of economists. Go to http://www.financialsense.com and look for the saturday “broadcast” link. You will see a link to this website on the 3rd hour broadcast section. I haven’t listened yet today but that figure was put out by them last month, maybe it is higher today. I think it is a pay site but the broadcast will give you the number the have recently calculated.

Comment by tj & the bear
2006-02-18 17:00:15

Here’s a link…

http://www.gillespieresearch.com/cgi-bin/bgn/

BTW, Williams — the guy that does the “shadow stats” — believes the country already is (and has been) in a recession.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by sharecropper
2006-02-18 16:32:11

This was a fun read, you were going gang busters. However, you forgot that if we don’t make a dramatic shift in our use of fossil fuels–within 10 years is the latest prediction–that the planet is doomed, the coastal real estate will be under water, and the ocens will be surging and crashing against the land. Giant glaciers will be floating about. Refugees will swarm out of the uninhabitable regions, it makes all this talk of buying property seem rather pointless.

Comment by auger-inn
2006-02-19 06:51:15

I didn’t want to ruin the surprise ending, I was saving it for next week. Now you spoiled it for me! Waaa!

 
 
 
Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-02-18 12:38:38

I have yet to see a tightly reasoned argument why laughing at the people hemorraghing money from a self-inflicted wound is bad, immoral and should not be done.

Come on morality police you can do better!

Comment by feepness
2006-02-18 13:23:24

Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee.

I’ve done lots of stupid things in my life, and will probably do many more. While I believe a select few need a good lesson in humility, many will be hurt who don’t deserve it, and many will laugh all the way to the bank who should be lined up and shot.

Comment by greenlander
2006-02-18 18:59:32

I disagree. The people who get hurt by the bursting bubble and “don’t deserve it” ARE the ones who deserve it. They should be the ones lined up an shot.

Comment by feepness
2006-02-18 21:35:20

So my buddy who moved away for a job in 1999 and back in 2003 and cannot afford to purchase a place while I happened to have stayed here the entire time… he deserves to be renting while I own my home?

Some people call me conservative, but I do believe in a sense of fairness… even if I don’t want the government enforcing it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Annata
2006-02-18 14:19:24

I often express “amused incredulity” when people do stupid things to hurt themselves, but I usually abstain from maliciously laughing at their misfortunes. To me, this has nothing to do with morality, but is purely a matter of self interest.

In my opinion, Schadenfreude has natural consequences that do not lead to a greater state of happiness for me. It does not make my mind more calm, nor does it increase my ability to see things more clearly or act more wisely.

To the contrary, I think it induces me to think that I myself would never become so deluded by greed or desparation to do such foolish things. Which of course is not true; the power of greed is exactly that it blinds you from seeing that you are being unwise.

If nothing else, laughing maliciously at the mistakes of others just makes me more embarrassed about the mistakes I make myself. I make plenty of mistakess, and being embarrassed about them impairs my ability to fix them, learn from them,and move on.

Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-02-18 15:43:42

Annata:

You win for the best argument.

I am not swayed but you make a good point.

If I am embarrassed about a mistake (we have all made many of them) it motivates me to approach the problem differently.

People sometimes are just hardwired differently.

 
 
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 14:23:20

You must be some sort of genius or is it just dumb luck? Are you laughing at the possible financial loss of your neigbors, co-workers, friends or just the ones you dislike? How about your relatives - any homeowners in that group? It is one thing to be happy for another’s success and quite another to dance in the streets at their misfortune. Something is wrong with your thinking.

Comment by Tom
2006-02-18 15:39:16

I think you read her comment wrong. She was saying we should NOT laugh at others mistakes because we make them ourselves.

Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-02-18 15:49:02

I laugh at my own mistakes and other peoples mistakes OK.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 16:13:53

I was responding to Sunsetbeachguy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by housegeek
2006-02-18 12:50:56

We live in close quarters in NYC, and we’ve endured some pretty scary times. Close quarters here means you can never really divorce the fortunes of the rich from the poor. If the economy tanks and if housing slides, those who lose out will immediately affect the fortunes of those who are better off. We might congratulate ourselves now on our lack of muggings, car-radio smash and grabbers and scary neighborhoods, but we know that that atmosphere can return as quickly as it left. Our sense of well-being and security is a function not of how the rich are doing, but how everyone else is doing.

And I wonder sometimes, if this bubble is really going to explode, how different NYC will be from the rest of the nation. Smile and do your superior dance, but then check your doors, windows, cars and wallets.

 
Comment by feepness
2006-02-18 13:06:08

My wife is in psychiatric health, partly funded by the local government (teen drug abuse treatment) and partly private practice (people whining — just kidding). Both are luxuries to a certain extent and will suffer under an economic slowdown. On the other hand, she’s only working part time as it is.

My job is more stable, I work for a large corporation that has a strong product which I do not anticipate will be overly affected by a downturn.

And should depression era disaster strike? We start shacking up more and more family members in smaller and smaller spaces… and if that fails, well, I hear they need workers in Mexico…

 
Comment by flat
2006-02-18 14:12:57

only gov workers ( the parasite class) gain in the deflation to come

Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-02-18 15:50:11

There are RIFs in federal, state and local government, or did you ignore the 3-4 postings today on that very topic.

 
 
Comment by tj & the bear
2006-02-18 14:40:05

My two cents…

* The crash will come hard & fast but linger for years.
* I will absolutely revel in the downfall of those “holier than thou” types that annointed themselves money-making geniuses during the bubble (just like those dot-com “new economy” dopes). This includes industry charlatans.
* I have no sympathy for anyone who suspended common sense for greed.
* I have been rather annoyed that honest people making a decent living or surviving on a modest retirement have been priced out.
* I am sympathetic to those that didn’t play the game but still will get hurt.
* I am very afraid what impact this will have on friends and family that have bought into the whole “goldilocks” economy bullsh!t.

No, I don’t know what affect the future will have on my little family, but we’re preparing for the worst. Renting, no debt, no long-term obligations and lots of safe, liquid investments. Working hard both to save and to assure ourselves of future employment.

There will be a time to buy, but the obstacles against such will be huge. Everybody will call it crazy, the future will look lousy, nobody will be lending money, and lots of people will be out of work. Nonetheless, if you recognize that now is not the time to buy, then you’ve got a good chance to tell when it will be the right time. A little saying from a near chopper shop: “In God We Trust… All Others Pay Cash”.

Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 15:45:02

How are you parsing-out the ones deserved of punishment and the ones merely caught-up in the whole “goldilocks economy”. Did the latter not expect big gains from their home purchase? Did they discount the price on their sale of the current home because they believed the 2 or 3 year profit “greedy”?

Give me a break. Many of these posts remind me of a seven-year old saying “it’s not fair!”. And further remind me of my father’s consistent response - “Life is not fair”.

Comment by tj & the bear
2006-02-18 16:06:03

Lighten up, va. I didn’t say that family & friends aren’t “deserved of punishment”, just that their being family & friends I still fear for them in their ignorance.

Again, the ones that bother me are the ones that have flaunted their unearned wealth and condescended upon those who did not share their fortune. Same for those that preyed upon them. What goes around, comes around, and karma can (and will) be a bitch.

Otherwise, I’m all for recognizing circumstances for what they are and profiting from them (legally and morally). That’s why I won’t have a problem buying at the bottom, as I’m sure you will too (since you appear to know what you’re doing).

 
 
 
Comment by Alex
2006-02-18 15:48:07

A depression would be nothing like the previous one.

For example, I could always search for jobs in Europe, Canada, or Australia or anywhere else in the world for that matter.

and a massive global depression would of course not be like the previous one either and I don’t think any of us could imagine what that might look like.

So I don’t think it is going to happen.

 
Comment by Out at the peak
2006-02-18 15:59:33

I work for a telecommunications company in R&D. We have had incredible YoY growth, and is nearly profitable. I’m one of the few that has increased wages of 13% in the last two years. An economic turndown could make people drive less so they will rely on telecommunications more. Or our customers will not risk investing in their subscriber base and will buy less product from us. There could be shifts either way which could make the product just stagnate.

If the product is only sustaining, R&D is at huge risk. My position is borderline in a situation where a 50% R&D layoff would occur. I worked for this company before, and was cut during the dotbomb when 50% R&D was shafted. I’m always preparing for a layoff because I’ve been laid off three times total. This time I’ve been stocking up on more water, food and necessities. I have ideas of how to utilize my skill sets when I’m unemployed to scrape by or prosper.

Oddly enough, I’m concidering some electronic luxury good items because when we have a downturn, electronics volume will drop considerably. That will drive up costs and make new technology prohibitively expensive. These devices will do me no good if the lights go out, but I’m hoping things will not come to that.

Comment by arlingtonva
2006-02-18 21:45:41

I work for a telecommunications company in R&D. We have had incredible YoY growth

Check it out wifi skype:
http://tools.netgear.com/skype/

Whole cities are starting to go wifi. The telebomb industry is not so safe.

 
 
Comment by Auction Heaven in '07
2006-02-18 16:33:16

Ah, Va_investor…the contrarian…

“My belief is that a good number of those who have been fence-sitting the past 3 or 4 years are simply too afraid to pull the trigger. It is useless trying to time the bottom - they will still be waiting in 15 yrs. Afraid to slip-up.”

Pulling the trigger in the last three years would have only shot myself.

This bubble should have burst two years ago. That’s when all these stupid loans came out. Now the financial pain will be far worse.

My plan for buying is pretty simple.

I have the properties I want in a geographical area, I have charted their high price, and their data. Now all I have to do is wait for a 30-40% reduction on comparable properties, and bingo, I go shopping for a firm 50% off, with one third of the property paid for in cash.

It seems you think you’re some sort of ‘risk taker’, and we are scared fools.

Before I went skydiving at Brown Municipal field in San Diego, I went through my parachute with a fine tooth comb. Myself and my teacher inspected every rubber band, and looked at every fiber and stitching.

He complimented me on being so thorough, and offered me a job.

He, like you, was wondering if my thoroughness would turn into fear up above.

“Absolutely not. In fact, even though it’s my first jump, I can guarantee you my pulse won’t go over 120 on the way down. If you want, you can put your finger on my throat and count.”

Sure enough, I was beyond calm on the jump out of the Cessna. We did exactly two flips, I arched perfectly, and we landed on a cloud of air in perfect position for the float.

Before our chute even open, he was asking me questions on the way down, with the DVD recorder on his hand getting it all.

“So what makes you like this? Why aren’t you freaking out? Don’t you know we’re freefalling?’

“Well, we did our homework, you know what you’re doing, and I am doing what you told me to do. We’re prepared, right? So why get all freaked out? Instead of talking about this, can I ask you a question?”

“Sure!”

“Way over there- see those buildings?”

“Yeah! What about them?”

“They seem awfully close to the Tijuana border. Do you think it’s possible that people are transporting illegal stuff into America under there, in long tunnels?”

“Naw! That would take way too much work, even for Mexicans!”

I think we all know how THAT turned out.

Grace under pressure, baby. Grace under pressure…

…and brains.

My homework is done, Va_investor.

My jump into this market will be correctly timed, with no hesitation whatsoever.

If you pulled the trigger three years ago, or know people who did, they weren’t really taking risks. They were really just shooting themselves.

Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 17:01:40

I first pulled the trigger in 1981 at age 22. 25 years and 50 transactions later, I have no problem jumping on the right deal. And no, with the exception of 3 absolutely unbelievable steals, I have not bought anything since 2002. I have plenty of cash waiting for the right deal.

I stand by my comment that many people are too afraid to make such a major committment.

Good luck with your timing. BTW - will you be a first time owner?

Comment by SB BubbleBeliever
2006-02-18 18:13:44

VA “investor”

You’re so full of BS…

Please humor me and read my comments to you at the top of the blog… you know the one where you talk about people having “jealousy and sour grapes” Now we’re up to around 131 posts and you’re still puffing up your chest… YOU truly are admitting to being a future “FB” Good Luck!!

p.s. remember about spending some of your new found “paper wealth” on anger management classes :)

Yours Truly,

SB BB

Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 18:33:02

131 (now 132) posts over what time period?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-02-18 18:51:41

I really wish Ben’s blog had an ignore feature for the VAINvestor blowhard.

 
Comment by SB BubbleBeliever
2006-02-18 19:16:04

SunsetBeachGuy,

Couldn’t agree with you more…

VAINvestor,

Again…. see my comments at the top.

Happy “investing” ;)

 
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 19:16:40

Right back at you Sunset (who “laughs at people hemmoraging from self-inflicted wounds”) i.e. real estate losses.

 
Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-02-18 19:35:16

VAINvestor:

You are the one bragging about your balance sheet and investments and giving internet morality lectures.

That is the definition of a blowhard.

 
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-18 21:14:33

It is difficult, I know. You would rather that I was another FB up to my eyeballs in debt and headed straight to foreclosure. At least you could laugh about that.

 
Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-02-19 10:43:55

Another non-sequitur from VAIN_vestor.

The topic was your blowhard status, not my opinion of your balance sheet. In case you are not aware anyone can be anything on the internet.

 
Comment by SB BubbleBeliever
2006-02-19 11:42:02

OOooooh OOOooooooh SunsetBeach Guy! DITTO from Santa Barbara BubbleBeliever… in fact, it might be worth your while (AND VA Investor’s too :) ) to check out today’s entry (at the top) WHERE I BASICALLY SAY THE SAME THING to VAINvestor. In it, I did call a TRUCE though… I would like VA to agree to the truce before he embarrasses him/herself any further. His ALFA DOG comments lead me to believe that he is MALE.

 
Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-02-19 12:28:12

I am not trying to antagonize or get one better but some stuff just needs to be called out.

 
 
 
 
Comment by feepness
2006-02-18 21:27:54

Wow, fascinating that those who seem to agree on the fact of a bubble disagree on the appropriate response to the point of general rudeness.

Fact is if I sell now I lose 15% in Fed Taxes and another 9.4% State, plus realtor fees, plus I gotta trick it out, plus I gotta take the time to do it, plus I lose my $1500/yearly property tax and my 5.375% fixed mortgage.

Do I stand to lose more to this bubble?

You bet! Quit a bit more even. I’m guessing 40%. Minimum.

But I’ve got a full time job, a new 8-month old, a wife, and I try to have a life. Plus I couldn’t have timed the top if I’d wanted to. I should have gotten it ready for sale when we had to do the Unlawful Detainer in December 2004. But I had a 3 month pregnant wife…

And isn’t this what we’re all talking about? This is life… and it isn’t always about having the biggest bankroll…

Anyways, long story short, we’re on the same side, let’s stop tossing barbs.

Comment by Ben Jones
2006-02-18 21:41:12

Feepness,
We are all in this together, IMO.

Comment by feepness
2006-02-19 01:16:48

The perhaps there is finally something to agree with on Yahoo

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Pata Nahin
2006-02-19 08:03:50

What does ‘Unlawful Detainer’ mean?

Comment by feepness
2006-02-19 08:55:25

It is the legal process for kicking out a deadbeat renter.

It’s a whole bucketful of fun, including months without revenue, posted notices, lawyers, and ultimately sherriffs. Ours left after the lawyers got involved and we got the last laugh by keeping all the bad checks and repeatedly presenting them at their bank until they were honored. We actually didn’t lose out that much…. under a couple grand… coulda been WAY worse.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by hedgehog
2006-02-18 16:47:38

I have two co-workers who are already talking like housing-serfs. They bought during the last few years. Now they want to consider moving to different jobs. Both of them dismissed jobs that would entail moving house because they don’t want to sell at a loss. One is married but has no children. The other has a big family but uprooted from Chicago a few years ago and his family would love to go back. It is not that they couldn’t aford to take the hit. It is some weird kind of denial.

 
Comment by TheGuru
2006-02-18 17:27:53

Auction Heaven in ‘07

LFMAO with that story about parachuting and Tiajuana — if it is true, that is funny as hell. Thanks for the laugh — people just refuse to believe things that go against the grain of “normal” thought.

 
Comment by rjsasko
2006-02-18 18:01:28

I have no problem watching the souffle’ collapse and a heck of a lot of people losing their shirts. Since I have been on the receiving end of a few economic shit storms I say the more the merrier! Been through the LBO’s, the corporate bankruptcy, the “Japanese Management Techniques” layoffs, the Bankruptcy Liquidation (rather than sell out to a competitor), and the ever popular “Please don’t tell anyone Sweetie because I would lose my job…but I can’t hire you…not even to work in the mail room with a B.S. degree…you’re the wrong color.” The housing bubble is slowly destroying my job anyway. It has brought so many newcomers into the flooring business that they are running labor and material margins into the ground. Better to have a major shake up than slowly bleed to death.

And here are a few more reasons for schadenfreude:

1. Went through this “dot-com” bubbly thing five years ago. If people can’t remember back five years and realize that the housing run-up is the s.s.d.d. then they deserve to get hosed. They got greedy and their going to get needy-real soon.

2. How damned hard is it to calculate when one makes “x” it is wise to spend roughly 1/3″x” on a car and 3″x” on a house. Not 5x…6x…7x…8x…etc. They deserve to get hosed. The math ain’t that difficult.

3. Lowest 30yr fixed rates in 50 years and people are going with adjustable rates???!!!! WTF!!! They deserve to get HOSED!!! Talk about stuck on stupid!!!

4. Make “x” in a year. House value inflates on paper. Think I’ll pull that “free” money out and spend 2″x” on remodeling my kitchen. $500 new stove not good enough. Must have $12,000 stove. Makes those frozen pizzas much more “classy”.

5. $8000+ tv sets. Gee, seems a bit “pricey” to me. Maybe there is a dollar-off coupon I can use to make that price more reasonable?

6. Don’t like it that I have to park my car on that dirty garage floor. Think a $9000 imported Italian porcelain floor would look better.

7. Tearing out perfectly good recently remodeled (couple of years at most) kitchen and bathrooms. Must have GRANITE and STAINLESS STEEL! Shit doesn’t stink if it is in a matte finish splatter glaze designer Kohler $900 toilet.

8. Master bathrooms larger than most living rooms with showers so large and with so many shower heads they require TWO commercial water heaters or the shower would run out of hot water in under 3 minutes.

9. My own sister is a F@#KED borrower who doesn’t know it yet who called me last Saturday looking for money so she could buy a hybrid SUV. Explained to her that (a) unless gas hits about $9 a gallon she is wasting her money on a hybrid and (b) if she doesn’t have any money to put down on this SUV and needs to borrow $$$ how is she going to make the monthly payments?

I have no problem with people making money…even tons of money. For all of those people who made out like bandits by cashing in and taking their money off of the table good for you. I do have a problem with all of those people still trying to play musical chairs when it has been damned obvious since last summer that not only has the music stopped playing but that there are a hundred people people still standing in the room all trying to sit down on the last chair while trying to hum “real estate never goes down and everything is great” pretending that the music is still playing and trying to rope in another round of suckers to get them off of the hook. Let ‘em hang!

Comment by amoney
2006-02-18 20:20:43

Amen.

 
Comment by feepness
2006-02-19 01:24:15

$8000 TV sets. $900 Toilets. Hybrid S-U-freaking-Vs.

Son, fetch me my hate stick.

 
Comment by goose_egg
2006-02-19 08:31:44

hey rjsasko, where are you located?

I ask because my brother-in-law has a flooring business, and his business prospects are the subject of quiet contemplation in my household. I fully expect that his wife and kids face some tight times ahead, but other members of the family try to reassure me by saying, “Oh, but he only does high end stuff for people who have real money; you know, old money that doesn’t depend on the rising value of homes. He’ll be fine.” That, ahem, does not strike me as sound reasoning.

 
 
Comment by bmfarley
2006-02-18 18:51:35

I work for a public agency in California that recieves much of its revenue from sales tax (public transportation). Given that higher home appreciation has led to many homeowners cashing out some equity and up their quality of life (new car, boat, clothes, hdtv’s, etc), if home appreciation recedes or even flattens over the next 3 or more years, local sales tax revenue may also flatten or not keep up with the cost to provide the public service. If other revenues do not make up the difference in lost sales tax revenue, then my agency, and myself, would work to scale back services to basically balance the budget and remain financially sustainable.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2006-02-18 19:52:05

I heard a new one tonight. A speculator in Utah figures that if the market turns on his pre-construction gamble, the coming appraisal won’t fund the loan and he’ll be able to walk.

Comment by feepness
2006-02-19 01:21:25

Not if they have cashed his deposit check.

 
 
Comment by DisgustedAppraiser
2006-02-19 06:50:14

Ben,
If this investor is using the builder’s lender, you can bet that the appraisal will come in at the “needed value” to see the deal through.
Even if it doesn’t, the appraisal will hit the trash without the buyer’s knowledge and another appraiser will be hired who will be more cooperative.

 
Comment by Doug
2006-02-19 12:09:54

I don’t see how Virginia Investor’s numbers add up. He has owned property for over 20 years. Hasn’t purchased since 2002 and with the largest runup in real estate ever, has only a 20% LTV. That smells of BS.

Comment by SB BubbleBeliever
2006-02-19 12:44:40

Doug,

GOOD CALL… if bloggers, lurkers and even VA Investor himself scroll the entire thread- they will see that a MAJORITY of posters are calling his bluff.

To me, his postings, rants and jabs are a sign of insecurity…

so I actually kind of feel sorry for the guy- and I DO HOPE THE BEST FOR HIM and his family.

Comment by va_investor
2006-02-19 13:24:20

You, Doug, and Sunset would be better served worrying about your own situations - not mine. P.S. I don’t have the time or inclination to explain how over 20 years of investing might result in an LTV of 20%.

Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-02-19 13:40:20

VAIN_vestor:

Classic blog move.

I am taking my toys and going home.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Doug
2006-02-19 14:12:49

It isn’t so much the 20 years of investing that smells of BS. I understand that you could keep purchasing new RE and keep your LTV at 20%.

It is when you said that you hadn’t purchased since 2002 that raised the BS flag. With the increase in RE value since 2002…how could you only have 20% LTV? Even if you purchased with no money down it seems it would be higher. Are you one of the many people taking equity out of your RE? That might work, but that wouldn’t fit the profile of a rich fat cat like you say you are.

I assume you are talking about residential real estate, since that is what this blog discusses and as far as I have read you never stated otherwise. I am sure you would have pointed this out by now if that were true. Let me know.

I don’t live in Virginia. Can anyone tell me if you can rent out homes/condos with a 20% LTV and cover all expenses in Virginia? I know in my neck of the woods you need about 50% or more, but I am in a very overvalued city.

As a new reader of this blog….I have seen how much you have posted. You actually do have the time to explain this.

 
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-19 15:37:36

Doug,

LTV stands for Loan to Value.

Example 100K house 20K loan = 20%LTV (80% Equity).

 
Comment by SB BubbleBeliever
2006-02-19 16:05:30

Hey VA Investor,

I did accept your response to the TRUCE… please read my final thoughts at the top. I wanted you to know my final thoughts on “cheering”. Thanks.

 
Comment by va_investor
2006-02-19 18:03:20

I agree everyone is looking out for #1, including me. I just try not to do so at the expense of others. It is human nature to envy the success, luck, inheritance, lottery winnings, stock options - you name it- of others. I sincerely hope that it is NOT human nature to want them to crash & burn.

 
Comment by SB BubbleBeliever
2006-02-19 20:48:46

VA,

There is a big difference between ROOTING for a market to change and rooting for someone to get burned.

I personally have never seriously or purposely rooted for an individual to get burned- but I will cop to the fact that I root for the MARKET to tank. I am an investor, and it is in my best interest for prices to come back down to a “more normal” state. This, by the way… doesnt mean that I DIDN’T root for prices to go up for all these years- I think you can figure out the rest ;)

AND YOU TOO:

EVEN though you have belittled quite a few bloggers in this thread (those that are “jealous” of your success, etc.) I believe that your PRIMARY human nature was to ROOT FOR the MARKET to continue ESCALATING… not rooting for people that were priced out of the market to crash and burn. That would make you one cold SOB.

SEE, so this works in both CAMPS. Just depends on what side of the tracks you find your investments on… at the time the market shifts.

 
Comment by HOZ
2006-02-19 21:32:53

I am trying not to root for any position, my best interests would be served by a gentle landing like a swan coming landing or believing in B. Bernake or the tooth fairy. I just do not see a happy ending.

 
 
 
 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post