Good move I think, I am short index funds. Notice that M2 is up 10% on a annual basis the last few months. Ben is afraid of deflation. With the $US down this morning, it will be difficult for the Fed not raise 1/4 point after flooding the system with liquidity. Then say we will watch and wait.(go on hold)
Being a HUGE debtor nation, the $US is a real problem.
We are only a huge debtor nation largely thanks to Ben’s predecessor, some of whose most easily deciphered economic commentary in recent years (clearly directed at dumb sheep) suggested that the low savings rate might not be a problem, due to the magic of the wealth effect brought on by ever-increasing asset prices. Of course, never mind that negative real interest rates tend to encourage rampant speculation in various risky assets, driving the savings rate to negative, the risk premium to the floor and asset prices through the roof.
“We are only a huge debtor nation largely thanks to Ben’s predecessor, some of whose most easily deciphered economic commentary in recent years (clearly directed at dumb sheep) suggested that the low savings rate might not be a problem, due to the magic of the wealth effect brought on by ever-increasing asset prices.”
Oh good grief, you got me started. A female talk radio host of who I agree most of the time on economic issues was saying how the great this economy is because real estate is doing well, people are able to buy more homes. I am of the same political party as that host, and the host was tying real estate values with the political party. I’m laughing by that time. And I know this bubble is going to make that political party lose a lot of votes when the crash comes. It’s embarrasing to me and sensible people in our party who have enough economic common sense to recognize an overinflated asset and potential economic collapse. The other political party is much worse and its economic prescriptions are nothing but faster acting poison. Tweedle dee and tweedle dumber.
Now this trade I understand. Like today’s silly NFP action. I don’t know how many people were taking the under (est 150k, actual lower) saying the market would pop then fade. Talk about divorced from fundamentals. The same number of people were employed this morning as last night but people think this is tradeable data. And it is but only as a weird sort of meta indicator of investor herd mentality.
Not here. Look at that candle from yesterday. Looks like it bottomed short term. If I were going to short that, I’d try for a partial position at the breakdown point of ~28 and add if it hit 30-31.
Short a coffee stock? Are you kidding? Coffee has only ever been up. Some of the companies that service it may fail, but coffee has been the best investment ever since discovery. No other drug has been such a hit. Never bet against coffee.
You sound like financial advisors in 1999. “Short an internet stock? Are you kidding? Technology has only ever been up. Never bet against the internet”.
The point is, the world needs both technology and coffee. And housing. Shorting a stock or a sector doesn’t mean you think the sector is a dinosaur…it means that you think the market is overpaying. And yes, the market overpays for coffee too, just like housing and technology.
“Never bet against coffee”? Honestly, Mole Man, you sound eerily like David Learah with that quote. You sure you don’t want to take that one back?
I suspect a “Black Friday / Monday / Tuesday” this October myself. I would rather it didn’t happen, but hisotry says there is a good chance of it this year.
Anyone who puts all their eggs in one basket is taking too big of a gamble. Those who are purely in treasuries could take a major hit if we get hyperinflation (Middle East oil fields are peaked and production is going to have to fall). Those who are purely into gold could take a hit too - lack of consumer spending due to years of heavy debt could cause massive unemployment and price drops in consumer goods, as well as a 60% or more drop in the S & P 500 index. A risk neutral portfolio is probably the best place for your savings outside your tax deferred retirement accounts.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Trojan Horse
2006-08-06 08:06:17
Agree 100% Bill. We all know that financially unstable times are ahead. None of us knows which way it will go. The million dollar question is, what is a balanced portfolio? I’ve currently got my “balance” like this: 55% short term CD’s, 25% equities, 15% precious metals, 5% commodities. 0% real estate!
Anyone have comments on what I’m doing wrong?
Comment by cactus
2006-08-06 09:44:51
Ha my portfolio is like yours except less PM. I will add back RE when this bubble blows over. Other than that I just can’t bring myself into a more balanced condition until the yield curve stops inverting.
It seems like I agree with most everyone on this Blog,
so different from discussing face to face my ideas with co-workers. This has never happened before? kinda werid.
We all hope (and some of us pray) that the economic collapse will be far enough away that we can prepare ourselves and families for it. With a risk neural portfolio and living well below your means for several years, your net worth (adjusted to inflation) will grow with leaps and bounds. I’m one of the fortunate few who is making quite a lot of money in my engineering field and I have very few expenses (because of roommates). I’m hoping all the rest of you have a good financial cushion as well. I’m not saying my good income will last. I may go back to the same middle class income in a few years, due to political decisions by a new regime in America. That is a huge reason I live well below my means. It’s not from pessimism, but from recognizing that everything operates in cycles. If 99% of Americans realized how cycles run everything, maybe there would be far fewer FBs.
Comment by cactus
2006-08-06 20:25:50
Hey Bill, you do defense work? I used to back in the early 1990’s lots of microwave stuff for Loral, but then we had a bit of a correction in Cali due to a change in politics. Plus a housing downturn because of that. ugh.
I slowly got into commercial comminications work and was a part of a hugh bubble, I was working on the Physical layer fiber optics at 10 gb/s. Saw my Conexant stock go to 130 a share, whooo hooo, fortunately I sold some. It was too high, just like my Townhome in 2006.
crazy world and high tech is just as crazy, changes all the time. maybe thats why I’m so paranoid?
I knew that tech bubble wasn’t going to last, we were selling, I mean shipping muxs to lucent that they didn’t even need, just to get it on the quarter’s books so presumably the VP’s could get a big bounus. Lucent shipped most of them back. hahaha
Comment by Bill In Phoenix
2006-08-07 06:06:18
Cactus,
Yes, I’ve been in the defense sector since graduating from college in 1985. I was a government employee up to 1996 and then I started finding out I could make money by going private sector. I had some work at Ford Aerospace in Newport Beach a few times (before it became Loral). Is that the one where you were? Yes, in my view, good things don’t last. I figure when the regime changes in 2008, my income could easily drop down to $70,000 per year. But I’ll accept it if it happens. What I wonder about is people who do not plan for cycles. Political cycles by either party distort the market, sometimes for good and sometimes not so good. In the long run, government planning is a loser deal. I try to smooth out the surprises that those politicians put forth by saving as much as I can. If you see me drive around in a shiny red Porsche, it will only be because I could afford to replace it with a brand new one every year from gains on my investments, not from my job. But I’m not at that point yet. I am at the point where i can pay for a roof over my head solely by my investments (risk neutral).
Comment by cactus
2006-08-07 18:58:22
I worked for Loral at a facility ( Wavecom ) in the San Fernando valley. It was fun but it ended in 1992.
You are smart to save the defense industry can be cyclical. I was out of defense by the mid 1995 although my last job in Cali was getting some DARPA stuff.
Florida’s property insurance market is a mess, despite legislators’ attempts to fix it for more than a decade.
The price of home and condominium insurance has soared to dizzying levels. Insurers have dumped longtime customers and slashed coverage for others. The state’s home insurer of last resort now is the biggest property insurer in Florida.
More and more homeowners and businesses are forced to ponder whether they can afford the Sunshine State anymore.
Much of this is the Legislature’s handiwork.
Fearing any action that would drive insurers out of the state, lawmakers have shown for years they won’t stand up to the insurance companies.
This year, with great fanfare, legislators directed $715 million in tax money to help close the $1.7 billion deficit at state-run Citizens Property Insurance Corp. All Florida homeowners still are on the hook for the remaining shortfall of almost $1 billion. Yet legislators allowed insurance companies to raise rates up to 10 percent without getting state approval and cleared the way for drastic price increases for many of Citizens’ customers.
“The casualty is the consumer,” said state Sen. Ron Klein, D-Boca Raton. “The Legislature has made the continuing mistake, year in and year out, of giving almost everything the insurance companies want to them, with the view that `Hey, if we do this, it will make more (competition).’
“How many years does it take? It’s over a decade where this thinking hasn’t worked,” said Klein, who is running for Congress.
Over the next 12 months in South Florida, many people will see their homeowner’s insurance bills more than double.
Ruth Berge, a divorced mother of two in Jupiter, is working a third job to pay additional expenses, including insurance.
“If I can’t make this work, I’ll have to [move] …,” the second-generation Floridian said.
The insurance market quagmire started in 1992 when Hurricane Andrew slammed into southwestern Miami-Dade County. Insurers realized their rates weren’t high enough to handle South Florida’s storm risk, and they had too many home policies concentrated in certain areas.
In the aftermath, state insurance officials and legislators allowed insurers to raise rates and slash coverage because thehurricane caused $16 billion in losses — that’s $22 billion in today’s dollars.
The promise from insurers then was simple: Allow much higher insurance prices and we’ll be able to handle catastrophes down the road. The state complied, approving big rate increases.
“I consider that a total renege of what we were promised,” said Robert Hunter, director of insurance for the Consumer Federation of America and a former Texas insurance commissioner. “The big rate increases we granted back in the mid-90s were supposed to bring stability at times like this … I feel like they lied to us.”
Florida insurers say claims from the eight hurricanes in 2004 and 2005 wiped out their surpluses, even though they collected higher home and condo premiums for more than a decade after Andrew.
“We paid out $35 billion. It’s a hell of a lot more money than we took in those two years,” said Sam Miller, executive vice president of the Florida Insurance Council, an industry trade group. “It seems to me that we’re taking a hell of a loss. And we’re still here.”
The employment report seals the deal on a pause in the Fed’s interest rate hikes; a continuation of the trend would spell the end of hikes for the current cycle. For four months, job growth has averaged just 112,000 a month, a level that would drive the jobless rate upward over time, given that the labor force grows roughly 150,000 per month.
The jobless rate might already be on an upward trac, having risen to 4.8% in July from a five-year low of 4.6% in June. While fitting with the Federal Reserve’s forecast for a rise in the jobless rate, the current pace of job growth could drive the jobless rate over 5% earlier than the end of 2007, as the Fed is currently forecasting. This is a clear basis for a pause on top of an already-strong case.
The current pace of economic growth is desirable given that it is what is necessary to wring the economy of inflation pressures. It normally takes at least two quarters of subpar growth to begin to whittle inflation pressures downward. With today’s data, and in combination with a plethora of other data, it seems that a second quarter of subpar growth is now at hand.
While this is good news for equity investors, if the sub-par growth continues into future quarters without any sign of change, profit concerns could begin to replace the ebullience of the end of the Fed’s interest rate hikes.
My guess is that if there is no rate increase the market will jump up for a day or two and then it will start tanking again. The market is already anticipating that there will be no increase and most of the rally will be played out by the time of the meeting. If there is a rate increase, and they make a statement indicating that it might be the last one, then the same thing might happen. But the end result in any case will be a return to the bear market within a short time.
I am fully confident that your puts will do really well, even if we see a jump over the next week it will be erased quickly. I would buy puts myself today if I could talk my husband into it, and more next week if the market was up higher.
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2006-08-04 07:03:17
My husband is not allowed to participate in these decisions He just enjoys the money. He’s like one of those guys in the NY Times article but I do make him work some to earn his keep.
Comment by Getstucco
2006-08-04 08:54:27
TxChick,
You remind me of academic research (by Terrence Odean) that suggests women make better investment decisions than men
Txchick trades like men (lots of risk) and short timeframes. The reason women in the study beat the men is that they operated more like Warren Buffett.
Comment by Trojan Horse
2006-08-06 08:12:14
I disagree bluto. The reason women beat men is because they are more capable of checking their ego and emotions at the door.
Women are better risk-takers because they have no problem minimizing loss. Whereas most of us men have the George Bush philosopy “We ain’t cuttin’ and runnin’! I’d rather lose a million troops than admit I was wrong!”
Comment by bluto
2006-08-07 05:41:23
If you go to the actual study, men and women make equally poor investment choices (differences between securities sold vs securites bought was negative and not statistically signficant), but women trade about 2/3 as much as men accounting for most of the differences. On a per trade basis men and women’s underperformance was 1 basis point per month different.
The good part starts on page 277. My conclusion was drawn from the authors on 278.
The main reason was they trade less frequently, one for buffett none for txchick (you can’t trade options without pretty heavy turnover). Other studies have indicated that there is a small subset of investors who consistently outperform in most markets but that their gains are more like rents for sniffing out price imbalances rathat than what most people would consider investing.
Market goes where it wants to go. The analysts will justify the movement with blabber either way. I believe Kim’s thoughts will play out, in that the market players want it to go up, so it will - but both reasons are the wrong ones.
Either the Fed pauses (because JOBS reports look bad) giving people a reason to have one more drink, or the Fed doesn’t pause (because INFLATION looks bad) giving the people a reason to have one more drink (they think it’ll be the last). In both situations, the market is just making an excuse to move in a certain direction, given information that very well could lead it to a less rosy long term outlook.
Works the same going down. In a receeding market, a favorable jobs report can still send the market lower because people think Fed will stop lowering (or start raising) rates.
Economics, in my opinion, is psychology first, numbers second.
This is what I like about Elliot Wave theory, the theory is based on the idea that the stock market is a giant barometer that shows social mood. When the social mood turns down or more conservative, it is immediately shown in the stock market, but the signs in the economy show up later in a recession or depression.
The guys at the Fed must have ditched the rational expectations paradigm in favor of the new paradigm of psychological economics, because their game plan seems to be based on the ability to manipulate a critical mass of sheep into silly actions like investing in second, third, and fourth homes they don’t really need in order to keep driving the price to ever more unaffordable levels. Of course, the purpose of the housing price inflation thus created is to allow consumers to unlock ever more wealth out of their homes through the magic of the home equity ATM machine, in order to keep the economy humming.
Does anyone else think this Ponzi scheme might some day fail?
We need an increase of at least 1/4 pt. Better if it’s 1/2 pt. Let’s scrub the HELOC and ARM losers out of the action.Leraeh can suck on a big one.Let me check with Suzanne, eh?
The market may sky rocket for a day or two until people start noticing the dollar tanking and gold and silver sky rocketing! Too much debt to support the dollar with low interest rates.
The Mogabmo Guru agreed with you, at least as a couple of weeks ago. However, the employment report has clouded the picture, even though it should not have — the difference between expected and actual jobs created could have been pure statistical noise, yet Wall Street commentators siezed on the discrepancy in order to twist BB’s arm into pausing. It will be interesting to see whether he takes the bait to respike the punchbowl.
I was also interested to see so many of the Fed minions come out and waffle on the rate hike in the press. I think someone here very cleverly pointed out they might be performing some PR that “I was not the bad guy”.
I am also interested that the bond market really seems to setting its own tune. If anything this has to scare the Fed because it loudly implys that they are no longer in charge. A good article on iTulip (if a bit on the money nerd side) has some information on some suggested mechanics behind the disconnect.
OK, say the Fed is “one and done”. The refrain from the real estate/mortgage lending community has been Buy/Refi now before rates go up. Say the Fed holds at 5.5%, and you’re a buyer. You gonna buy now while rates are still “historically low”, or you gonna hold out hoping they go back down? Expect the real estate crowd to say “you can always refi later when rates go down” etc. etc. ad naseum. Maybe the Fed will go into a protracted hold period while the FB’s slowly fall off the tree, and the buyer’s are in “wait and see” mode.
Yeah, the conundrum forces the Fed’s hand. TxChick, smart play on the puts. The probabilities for stock market declines within 6 to 12 months is very high. Bulls, go ahead and load up on 5% Tbills and loose money, guaranteed! Me? Happy long on Au, shhhh!
It makes the hair stand on the back of my neck when thinking of what is possible in the next 12 months. I am prepared for worst-case scenarios now, not just a stock market “crash”. Take your pick on any number of financial, terrorist, war, pandemic or natural disasters. Fortunately, all preparations have a recreational aspect as well as providing peace-of-mind…
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Neil
2006-08-04 06:51:25
I agree, the fall will be ugly. I’ve jokingly posted “Beware the ides of October” as we’re in for something ugly by then. With the current state of the economy, Fred Hooper is right… all we need is one shock to the system and the real estate, commodities, and stock markets are going to be hit hard. Maybe it will be a hurricane through the gulf (or Florida). Maybe the middle east conflict spooks us. Or the bird flu gets scarier…
Its scary to see the markets so unstable that one bad disturbance is all we need for a drop.
Neil
Comment by Kim
2006-08-04 06:55:37
Neil, it doesn’t need a shock. It will go down on its own, but you can be sure the media will pick anything it can find to blame it on.
Comment by Sol Veritas
2006-08-05 20:53:59
(from the movie “Twister”) “It’s already here!”
Google news articles on “amazon drought”. Long story short, one more year of drought = no more Amazon rain forest. Very scary if true, worse than terrorism, bird flu, mideast (unless someone goes nuclear). Don’t worry too much about it though; there’s nothing any human can do at this point.
in the last 5 years or so a lot has been happening in the markets that doesn’t make any sense. This is a time where it is better to step aside and let the market come to its senses (which might as well take many years …).
I agree. I’m still thinking the people who are able to save money will load up on one or more of the places to park money: money market funds, short term CDs, T-bills, and savings accounts (for the average Joe renter). Consumer spending will decrease, and stocks will drop. All that besides real estate prices dropping. On the other hand energy prices are going to skyrocket for the next 20 years. Inflation and deflation. Precious metals, and perhaps laddering with a mixture of T-bills and notes are probably the safest ways to weather this storm ahead. Keep renting!
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by cactus
2006-08-06 09:56:47
If you think energy is going to continue up why not buy energy stocks?
Guess I’m the perma-bear on this one. With Australia, Europe and the UK just having raised their rates, I don’t think it’s possible for BB to take a pass. This talk in the media, nervously giving all the reasons why a hike isn’t necessary, seems to me much the same rhetoric we’ve heared before each of the last two hikes.
Further, Ben needs to create a persona. Right now, he looks like Gentle Ben — a bad ID for the daunting job ahead, if he plans to keep it. He needs to buy some cigars and practice scowling and finger-pointing up at the gods of Congress.
I think a .25 increase is coming and would not be totally shocked if a .50 stake were whipped out from under the cape.
He whips out 50 basis points and there will be an outcry from Wall Street as has been seldom heard before. On the other hand, the dollar will skyrocket.
The futures market’s predication today is about a 33% chance of a 25 bpp rate hike, and a 66% chance of a pause. There’s really no chance for a 50bpp hike.
at least in the EU, the 0.25% rate increase was already a done deal. Home prices made their biggest jump in several years over the last three months, both in the UK and Netherlands (countries with the biggest pricegains in this bubble) and probably other EU markets as well.
Experience in EU shows that higher rates from the ECB do NOT translate into higher mortgage rates (or rates on savings accounts). After 4x 0.25% uptick from the ECB, rates in the Netherlands have barely moved, maybe around 0.3% total.
So, the rate from the central banks no longer seems relevant for the market; they know the banks will do everything necessary to keep the easy money flowing and the housing bubble growing.
As for the US, I think the Treasury charts say it all: the 10-year treasury broke down today and the homebuilders index has every reason to jump. This not only signals and end to the rate increases, it signals the market is convinced that lower rates are around the corner.
Without a real depression (which is a possibility, but unproven up to now) I’m pretty sure there will be an echo bubble in many parts of the US next year.
I’ve been thinking the same thing, as I’ve watched the EU the last couple of years. Not certain it will happen, but you are right. There is a chance anyway.
If BB raises rates the housing and consumer markets will CRASH big time. If he lowers rates the dollar will start to crash.
I think they will try to pospone the above as long as possible then start to lower rates due to the slowing economy. Early ‘07 at the latest.
Recent economic data, combined with today’s payroll report, weigh heavily against the need for additional interest rate hikes. They do not yet, however, provide a basis for an interest rate cut. As I said earlier, the current rate of growth is actually desirable and this will continue to be the case for a little longer. A speeding up of growth would be premature; inflation would accelerate.
With this in mind, I find the Treasury market a bit pricey at the moment, as yields have fallen below the funds rate by amounts that tend to occur only when an interest rate cut is near. In fact, if the 10-year were to fall to 4.75%, it would be 50 basis points below the funds rate, something that tends to occur only when an interest rate cut is imminent. Because it’s not, a further decline in Treasury yields looks unsustainable. It’s rare enough for Treasuries to be below the fed funds rate; this is only the fourth time in 16 years that the 10-year has dipped below the funds rate. On all other occasions, an interest rate cut was delivered within six months.
While an interest rate cut might occur within six months, a cut is not imminent, which is what is needed to justify a 10-year Treasury at a spread of 50 basis points below the fed funds rate.
Whointhehell would buy this ugly dog? 4.75% for 10 loooong years when you can no cost buy a CD for 8 months at 5.76%. Anybody think even with the trouble acomin’ for the banks that these 10yr will be paying a lower rate in the spring? My money is where my mouth is. These will be 5.2% by fall. Combination of risk premium and inflation.
The market is convinced that rates will be going down within a few months; all other explanations (like the one from mr. Crescenzi which basically says that the market is wrong) have history against them.
ummmm, thestreet is writing to its audience who has been trained to think that the market is linked to interest rates. I think that interest rates would have to go up 1 or 2 percent more before the return rates of interest versus equities would start competing. today, many have tax free investments and that makes equities more competitive even with rising interest rates.
well vangard has a fund VAAPX that allocates between stocks and Bonds depending on yields and estimated earnings and other things, etc. It has been all stocks for years now. I have noticed that usually when the treasury bond curve inverts we get a recession, a good time to buy bonds. But it seems most experts don’t like bonds now and would rather be in stocks. Including this Fund. So as usual I’m confused. ugh again.
I read the chat. It was lame. Maryann only let through comments about what kind of house people used to live in/need to live in. We want bubble talk and real life stories of people in the market now. None of this “i used to live in a bedroom with 2 sisters” crap. She stinks.
I cannot stand her moronic rants, she adds zero value to any meaningful factual discussion of the RE market. Previously she was talking about the summer boom now she denies any knowledge of it, but is aware of an August quiet in the market, she is a shill for the RE pimps. Makes me want to throw up on her face.
In response to an article about unaffordable housing in Bozeman, MT, I posted a comment referencing the housing bubble. The author’s reply to me seems to amount to “it’s different here.” Her reply is below. But is it possible that mountain resort-type locations will always be unaffordable? Think Jackson Hole, WY.
By the way, a HBB field agent around Bozeman calculated that about 1 in 33 homes in the Bozeman area are now for sale. Unlike Jackson Hole (surrounded by National Forests and a National Park), there are miles and miles of buildable land west and north.
The original article is about “Inclusionary Housing.” I bet Cote loves it already!
Marcia says:
I’ll give you one word in return: decades. That’s how persistent Bozeman’s inadequacy of affordable housing has been. It has remained true in profoundly varying market conditions and was evident right before the bubble started expanding (at the beginning of this long growth cycle, when the city first studied and considered IH in 1994 and decided to try other approaches first). I agree with you there are signs of market softening and prices beginning to adjust, but prices would have to plummet spectacularly for home ownership to be in the price range of average workforce wages. And Bozeman shows every sign of continuing to be popular, to attract new residents because of its amazing setting, etc. Typical predictions are that its growth cycle may not always continue at the current record pace and may vacillate some but that Bozeman will continue to grow at a significant rate for many years. That will continue to put upward pressure on housing prices, even if occasional adjustments occur. Affordable housing is a nearly constant issue for growing communities, and it’s why so many in similar circumstances to Bozeman have adopted IH. After 27 years of addressing housing issues in Bozeman, I do not believe the need will cease, though the program target will doubtless need occasional adjustment as conditions change. And any practical alternatives for addressing our persistent affordability challenge certainly deserve attention, but Bozeman needs a mechanism to ensure steady, reliable creation of affordable housing along with higher-end housing as the community grows. IH in other communities meets that goal more effectively than any other approaches anyone has been able to identify so far.
I’m still laughing about this one: http://www.wtop.com/?nid=104&sid=869914 It seems that many of the new homeowners are so absolutely clueless about home ownership that when repairmen are finally called, they find “doors hung upside down. … more than one sliding pocket door that won’t open because someone nailed a picture on the wall and into the door” One homeowner tried to “spackle over wallpaper” and ultimately just tried to sand and smooth it so “nobody would notice.” Is anyone here surprised? Probably not, but I was laughing aloud and the whole office wanted to know what was so funny. Wait till these clowns try to sell their “investment!”
LOL…would you buy a house from this guy? Clearly he never got hooked on phonics…
GREAT OPPPORTUNITY, A DUPLEX OF EACH UNIT WITH, 2 BEDROOMS AND 1 BATH,GARAGE FOR 2 CARS,IN A VERY QUIET NEIGHBORNHOOD OF LONG BEACH, SALE OWNER TO OWNER, OWNER OFFER TO PAY SOME CLOSING COST , OR EITHER MAY PAY UP TO $10,000.00 DOLLARS FOR CLOSING COST, WE OFFER 100% FINANCING , EASY TO QUALIFY
AND IF YOU HAVE 10% DOWN PAYMENT WE CAN GET YOU A VERY LOW MONTHLY PAYMENT,
WE CAN GET YOU THERE IN LESS THE 30 DAYS, OWNER WANT TO MAKE THIS TRANSACTION QUICKLY AS ASAP. OWNER IS DESPERATE, PLEASE BE SERIUS ON THIS TRANSACTION
IF YOU ARE INTEREST PLEASE CONTACT
CIMAX HOME MORTGAGE INC
ASK FOR PABLO RODRIGUEZ
or e-mail at pablo.cimaxinc@yahoo.com
562-251-0139
VOICE MAIL 310-878-4758
This may be the proverbial final straw for some folks around the country. Already happening in the Inland Empire (CA.)
BTW, did they think cooling a 3000+sq home would be cheap?
HEAT WAVE; INLAND RESIDENTS SIMMER OVER HIGHER ELECTRIC BILLS//Cost of keeping cool now due and payable
MARY BENDER AND LESLIE BERKMAN
1536 words
11:23 am, 08/03/2006
The Press-Enterprise(Internal Content)
English
Aug. 2, 2006 — Inland residents who sweated through July’s triple-digit swelter now have swoon-worthy electric bills - some for several hundred dollars - to ponder.
Skyrocketing energy bills because of the heat storm’s record energy demand, coupled with rate increases, have sparked outrage and worry among Southern California Edison customers who wonder if conservation alone can bring them relief.
Reno Fontana, 53, of Rancho Mirage, said Edison billed him $1,005 for June 15 to July 14. “I was stunned and in disbelief. I didn’t know it was possible to go to four digits. What are we to do?” he said.
For the same period last year, his bill was $345.
“It is both because of the rate increases and heat that forced us to leave on the air conditioning 24 hours a day,” Fontana said. “It is like the perfect energy storm.”
To afford the bills, Fontana said he and his wife will have to change their lifestyle this summer, eliminating dinners out and weekend trips to the beach.
Edison spokesman Tom Boyd said the utility’s customer service agents received 13,919 bill inquiries in July, more than double the figure from July 2005. Customers primarily asked why was their bill so high, whether there was a billing or meter error, and what they could do to lower their bills.
“With increasing gasoline prices and energy bills, it is putting a stranglehold on your finances,” said Joanne Dopp, of Rancho Cucamonga. Last August, 2005’s hottest month, the family’s electric bill was $440, she said. Although they used less power last month, Edison told her their July bill will be $946, Dopp said.
In an effort to reduce electric use, Dopp said she drained the family spa, raised the air conditioning thermostat to 78 degrees and turned down the refrigerator temperature. She said she’ll probably empty and unplug a second refrigerator in the garage.
Eastvale resident Jane Anderson lives in a 3,400-squarefoot, two-story house. This month, her Edison bill was $738, a jump from the previous month’s total of $493.
Anderson fears her next bill - which will encompass July’s heat wave, when the mercury soared over 100 degrees on several days - could approach $1,000.
“A lot of people are saying they’re going to have to sell (their house), because they can’t afford it,” she said.
At a recent community meeting in Eastvale, residents asked a Southern California Edison representative if the utility could recalculate the “baseline” level on their bills - the modest allotment of daily and monthly electricity usage offered at the cheapest rate. Residents contended the baseline assigned for their community - in northwestern Riverside County - wasn’t realistic based on the Inland Empire’s arid climate, especially for homes in the 3,000-square-foot range.
“The baseline is absurdly low. I have complained for years on ours, and I’ve had (Edison) come out and check the meter,” Anderson said. “I just couldn’t figure out why (the bill) would constantly be high.”
BASELINE RATE VARIES
Jim Schichtl, Edison’s manager of rate design, said the baseline is intended to provide households only with enough electricity to meet basic necessities such as lighting and refrigerating food.
The baseline is figured at between 60 percent and 70 percent of the average electric consumption of homes and is approved by the California Public Utilities Commission, Schichtl said.
The baseline also takes into account climate differences within Edison’s territory, Schichtl said. Residential customers receiving basic service in Mira Loma, using no more than 15.4 kilowatt hours per day, can qualify for the lowest baseline rate. Households in Palm Desert can qualify even if their daily power use is as much as 47.6 kilowatt hours per day.
Schichtl said because average bills within each climate region are calculated every three years, the baseline is adjusted to reflect changes in lifestyles, such as preferences for consumer electronics.
Edison has 1.24 million residential customers in Riverside and San Bernardino counties.
Calimesa resident Heidi Johnston saw her bill - for mid-June to mid-July - skyrocket. She was charged $199 the previous cycle, and $495 for the current bill.
“I called the electric company the next day. I said: `Do you want to tell me why my bill (more than) doubled from last month?’ I was probably his 200th call,” Johnston said.
The Johnstons’ baseline allocation for the most recent billing period was 508 kilowatt hours, and the family used 2,047 kilowatt hours of electricity.
Other residents of the 480-unit mobile home community, Plantation on the Lake, fared much worse - and, on top of that, many are retired and living on fixed incomes, she said.
“Fortunately I work, so one way or another I’ll get my bills paid,” said Johnston, 47, who owns a flower shop in Calimesa. “But I live in a senior citizen park, and these seniors don’t have that kind of money. How are they going to pay this bill?”
EXTREME CONSERVATION TACTIC
The Joslyn Senior Center of the Cove Communities in Palm Desert has had to bear the increased electricity rates along with its clients.
The June bill at the center was $4,522, a huge leap from the $2,843 the nonprofit group paid in June 2005.
“That just about knocked me off my chair when I opened that bill up,” said Peter Rittenhouse, the group’s executive director.
To save energy, the center closes a third of the building for most of the summer and keeps the thermostat there near 90 degrees. The temperature in the occupied part of the building is usually set at 78 degrees. Fans whiz overhead.
Rittenhouse worried that if rates increase again next summer, he may be forced to close the center on summer weekends to save money.
Tom Hall, a PUC spokesman, said the reason for establishing electric rates in tiers that ascend with electricity consumption was to motivate households to practice conservation.
This year, Edison’s average residential rate has increased 13.4 percent because of rising natural gas prices. It also has approval for another rate hike averaging 6 percent for residential customers to finance improvement of its distribution and transmission system.
Because of the pain their customers are feeling from the current heat storm, Edison asked the Public Utilities Commission to defer the new rate increase from August until November. While awaiting PUC action, the utility said it is shelving the rate increase.
SOLAR ENERGY INTEREST UP
The Dopp and Fontana households plan to dodge future rate increases by investing in solar electric systems. Fontana said he and his wife will pay $75,000 for a system that he figures will pay for itself in utility bill savings within six years, after which they won’t be bothered by Edison rate hikes.
“We are drawing a line in the sand and that is it,” Fontana said. “I refuse to do this anymore.”
Solar contractors said rising electric rates have boosted business because it is easier to justify the initial expense of solar installations.
“The higher the rates go, the quicker they pay for themselves,” said Max Balchowsky, owner of Solar Electric Energy Systems in Palm Springs. For about the past eight weeks, he said, he has been getting six to eight calls a day from prospective customers. He said previously he got only about a half-dozen calls a month.
Eastvale residents Erik and Brandalyn Taylor say that until this summer, their electric bills were no more than $200 for their two-story, 2,400-square-foot house. But this month, their Edison bill was $602. With children ages 6, 3 and 1 - and, since last summer, a swimming pool - they’ve never come close to their maximum baseline energy allocation of 15.4 kilowatt hours a day. Their latest bill showed average daily consumption at 77.7 kilowatt hours, Taylor said.
The family signed up for an Edison program that shuts off their air conditioning at certain times, in exchange for a rebate.
“When they built the house, we had ceiling fans put in most of the rooms,” Taylor said. “Two years ago, we tinted (the windows) in the back of the house, which gets most of the sun.”
Next summer, they hope to have a patio cover built to keep the downstairs rooms cooler - and their bills lower. * * *
Staff writer David Olson contributed to this story. * * *
RESIDENTIAL ELECTRIC RATES
Southern California Edison rates are based on levels of usage in relation to a baseline rate per kilowatt hour.
Up to the baseline: 11.8 CENTS
1 to 30 percent over baseline: 13.7 CENTS
Rates on the upper tiers increase in November
31 to 100 percent over baseline: 22.3 CENTS TO 22.8 CENTS
101 percent to 200 percent more than baseline: 31.2 CENTS TO 35.5 CENTS
A fifth tier will be added:
For usage of 201 percent over baseline the rate will be: 48.2 CENTS
Reno Fontana, 53, of Rancho Mirage, said Edison billed him $1,005 for June 15 to July 14. “I was stunned and in disbelief. I didn’t know it was possible to go to four digits. What are we to do?” he said.
Solar Energy with today’s and the next 5 years of technology will only every be a minor player in CA’s grid power.
I know I used to sell Photovoltaic systems and I buy power for a large user.
There isn’t enough ore processing capacity in the world to expand PV manufacturing without first waiting 3-5 years for the next ore processing plant to come online.
Interesting HB stock action today. HOV was way down after hours on a serious earnings warning and then was up at the open today. I decided to buy more 30 strike puts at 10:00 am and the stock is already down $1.50 from the time that I purchased the puts. I also bought more WCI puts, as I expect that their earnings will be grim next week and will only get worse during the fall. I have a few Aug, many Sept and December WCI puts and a few of the March 07
I agree that index puts may be a good options, but I am still buying puts mostly on leveraged banks, lenders and especially builders. They have had a good bounce during the last two weeks, so a fed pause is should be priced in, especially if the fed still keeps open the option for raised in the fall, which they surely must unless a recession appears around the corner
Funny, I did the same thing: MTH, WCI, and HOV August puts after the morning pop. I kept raising my stops and got stopped out of MTH and WCI. WCI and LEND report the day after the FOMC, so I am considering buying puts Tuesday after the post-FOMC pop.
NNMORTG;….Are you out there ?? I am in Reno for 5 days…I went South and looked @ some Lennar, K & B and some other smaller builders…I am going to look @ PULTE/Del Webb today….Any real soft housing tract’s you can recomend ??…I would like to drive through and take a look…Thanks…
We hear from brokers, real estate agents, and appraisers — any underwriters out there willing to post about their experiences? They are the most crucial part of the approval process & yet they’re never heard from
Anybody from the Portland area on here? I’ve been hearing from a friend up there that new condo’s, etc. are going up like made, things are selling briskly, no slow down, etc. I think she was implying my bubble talk was hot air. I looked at the median price tracker and although Portand’s prices are steadily climbing upwards, so is their inventory. Anyone have first hand knowledge? Many thanks.
Chip, my folks are from SW of Portland (Lake Oswego/West Linn area). Prices in their neighborhood have doubled in the past three years—median is around 400k there, nearly twice what it was before the lending bubble. Homes in their neighborhood have sold briskly, even recently. However, there is indeed more inventory, and now much more price pressure. No ridiculous incentives like here in Phoenix, which is probably like FL and SAC, the epicenter of the coming crash.
There are several condo towers going up on the south waterfront and in the pearl district. I’ve been watching the south waterfront project. Only one of them is finished yet. It’s reportedly 90% sold. All the others will finish over the next 14 months or so, but I don’t have sales data for them.
FYI, I just moved back to Portland (OR) a few months ago from Southern Oregon. The CA bubble definitely made an impact in there, but the wave hit Portland late and with deminished ferocity. My preception is that things have finally started to crest in the last month or so. I doubt that we’ll have the CA magnitude blowout that I, and many here, expect here in Portland. That said, I’m still renting for the next year because the drop that does happen is still worth waiting for IMHO, particularly in the condo market.
I think Seattle and Portland are both at the top of their respective bubbles right now. Actually Seattle is probably a little ahead of Portland. Same Pacific Northwest west of the Cascade Mountains type location. We live 1 hour north of Seattle, and my husband is in construction and I can tell you that housing is still going strong around here.
I’m in the glitsy urban area of Portland called the Pearl, and have done a little work on that market. They basically missed the sales season. According to First American Title records there were only 12 closings in June, and 12 in July.
Although price reductions off of listed prices are now the norm, the prices are still shocking, and are typically still up 40-60% in just three years. For instance there is an new building called the Pinnacle, that opened last fall, and has been a flipper heaven, at least so far. I spotted one transaction, that closed in June for 834k. This seller would have locked in 2004 prices at 594k, and didn’t even have to close it until Nov. 2005 when the building opened. A 40% flip profit is amazing. There are
I think Pearl has a long way to fall, but what we are still seeing is this huge inventory buildup, and several more large buildings coming on line with the units offered at much higher prices than the Pinnacle (which will make successful flipping problematic), and the general buyer’s strike pattern witnessed everywhere else. Prices have weakened some, but are still sticky at ridiculous levels.
I’m in a southern suburb of Portland. I get an email when a house changes status (comes on the market, changes price, listing expires, etc.) and fits my criteria. Wow has it exploded in the past two weeks. Could be a statistical anomaly, but inventory is definitely rising. We’re about at 3 months of inventory according to my realtor and were at 2 months a month and a half ago. Things are still selling if the price is right. I would not call it slow, but I would say that things are slowing down. I’ve seen all the condos going up in Portland, but I don’t know any sales figures. My take is that prices are cresting and levelling off. I would not buy now.
My realtor is very successful and bullish (still) on real estate. I made a bet with him about 9 months ago that our region’s prices would go down by August ‘08. At the time of the bet his sentiment was “NO WAY!!! Real Estate only goes up! It’s different here”. Last week his sentiment was “I still like my odds on the bet, but it does seem to be slowing down”. That’s a huge change in sentiment for this person. If he can say that, I’m confidentt that things are slowing down.
Definitely slowing. Two realtor friends have been talking about how slow it has been lately. Inventory steadily rising every day. Prices have peaked though not falling much yet. Looking at SFRs, mostly close in eastside.
From Kauai:
Real estate market peaked, expert says http://www.kauaiworld.com/articles/2006/08/04/news/news02.txt
Catch this stanford educated dumb ass describe the obligatory permanent plateau after the peak as a “tranquil phase”.
Economists suck.
i just received my SoCal Edison Electic Bill, Yikes !! i live in a one story home, 1400 sq ft. My bill during the summer is generally $60 max, average is around $40 for the hear. Last month’s bill was over $100. July’s bill was over $200 !!! WOW !
I’m glad i rent and can pay 50% less than what it would cost to mortgage this joint, i can’t imagine how tough it’s going to be for those in SoCal who are fighting to pay a fat mortage, then fill up the fat tank in their SUV, and pay to fill up their “fat” house with cool air.
Yikes
All there. Appraisal fraud, greedy flipper, clueless newbies, declining market. And the scary thing, is how much more of this is out there to be found???
how stupid, well there goes the old people’s credit. I wonder if the investor was a silent owner of the house that was bought?
RE scam, I think there are going to be many more of these until this bubble fades away.
And realtor Ron actually took the 3-Day Ward’s course, so he’s an expert. Buy more courses, Ron. They are tax deductible. Assuming, of course, that you still have an income!
I actually know someone who did this (signed the loan docs for someone else due to real buyer’s bad credit). $800K house, 100% financing. My friend (the one with good credit) is retired and, IMHO, was taken advantage of, big time. Not particularly bright. I tried to warn her & she didn’t want to hear any of my “know it all” advice. $5,000/mo payments (not including taxes & ins.). No way she can come close to paying that in the event the buyer defaults. Ouch.
After the crash, when the collective snake-oil hucksters of the NAR, appraisal industry, Freddy Mac/Freddy Mae, and mortage brokers have been sent packing, perhaps new, untainted, honorable institutions with reputable leaders will arise in their place. And, no doubt, we’ll see a flood of reforms and new laws (with actual enforcement) to curb the excesses that helped cause this bubble. The “voices in the wilderness” who foretold this disaster, and acted with integrity and foresight, will exert considerable influence in the New Era as sanity imposes itself.
As the FBs and disgraced NAR officials huddle around their hobo-camp trash can fires, roasting rat kabob and sharing tales of woe while passing the paper bag that holds the Ripple, thousands of new, fiscally-responsible homebuyers, who in the dark days of 2005-2006 had their Road to Damascus awakening after happening upon this site, will give silent thanks to Ben Jones.
And somewhere, amidst the blackened skeltons of unfinished condos and “luxury” condos converted to moderately-priced apartments, Suzanne will be leaning wearily on her corner lampost, adjusting her fishnet stockings as she plies her new trade, though she still seals the deal with a Hummer in the driveway.
Mogambo Guru has written an excellent recent analysis of Bernanke’s principal challenge (the need to fool everyone into believing he is fighting inflation so that he can stave off deflationary pressures…):
“Now we see the Bank of Bernanke’s strategy more clearly: it must crush inflationary expectations, while preparing to fight deflation as soon as it appears. When U.S. asset prices crack - that is, when stocks, bonds, and real estate begin to collapse - you will see another rush to cut rates.
It worked so well last time, from 2001-2004, it surprised us. Too bad it’s not the sort of trick you can pull over and over.”
And I agree — these fooling games the Fed is playing become increasingly predictable over time. Just ask any hedge fund manager. The problem is that with such predictability, it is no longer sound economic fundamentals that drive investment decisions, but rather gambling strategy based on anticipation of the Fed’s next market manipulation. Meanwhile, massive misallocation of capital proceeds unchecked in the real economy, as the effect of repeated and predictable bailouts is to undermine the price signal that provides indication of whether investments are worth the risk of undertaking them. If BB succeeds in propping up “the corpse” of a housing market as the Guru suggests he intends to, then we can expect the imbalances in the US economy to continue to grow, with a still uglier day of reckoning in store when the heir of Volcker eventually takes charge.
Why Mogambu thinks the Fed’s secret plan is to keep housing price inflation percolating, to whatever extent possible. Again, the strategy depends on fooling a critical mass of sheep. I hope Robert Lucas and Milton Friedman are not paying attention…
——————————————————————————————–
Both Bernanke and Greenspan recognized the deflation enemy, and raised rates - not to fight inflation (although that is what they appeared to be doing), but to “reload the gun.” They had to hike rates in order to be able to cut them to fight deflation. Now, with 525 basis points from here to zero, at least the Fed has a new round of ammunition.
But what will get them to pull the trigger? The most likely signal of deflation is a slowdown in consumer spending. Since consumer incomes are either flat or falling, consumer spending depends on the real estate market continuing fat and flourishing. And for that, the housing market must be propped up like a corpse at a viewing. The Fed must try to keep house prices from collapsing - at any cost! But, the housing market depends on long rates, not short rates. Mortgages are long-term debt. And long-term lending rates depend largely on lenders’ views on inflation. If they think they have a real inflation fighter at the Fed, they are most likely to lend at low rates. If, on the other hand, they see the Fed’s knees weakening, or its hands toiling over a white flag, they’re likely to want higher rates.
“But, the housing market depends on long rates, not short rates. Mortgages are long-term debt.”
You know, I used to think that…however, aren’t some of the big coastal areas’ prices dependent on an ever growing number of “exotic” loan products (Option-ARM, interest only, very low teaser rates)…and aren’t those exotics tied to short term rates? In other words, can’t Ben B. re-spike the punch bowl (with 151 even) by lowering short term rates, lowering rates for Option-ARMs and I/O ARMs?
Update from Europe:
I posted a comment about 2 weeks ago highlighting several recent mainstream print articles in the UK that touted that real estate prices were going to continue to climb towards the sky for the next 10 years. Same old logic: “immigration”, “they aren’t making more land”, ad naseum.
Today, to my shock and horror, I see the headlines have changed.
You guys can take your shorts on the market through commodities. Problem is the timing has to be exactly right or say goodbye to all your play money. Can’t you see the system is set up so “little” guys like us get burned? I watched my dad in the 60s, 70s, and 80s burn up his money. Slow down and make money through wisdom.
“Can’t you see the system is set up so “little” guys like us get burned?”
This is what HedgeFundAnalyst told us — “the house always wins.” We have not heard from him lately; I wonder if he still thinks he is part of the house these days? (I will assume that he is so busy making money hand-over-foot that he has no more time to share his insights here…)
The only people speculating on the bursting of the housing bubble are the following:
People who sold their primary residence to bubble sit.
People who short housing related stocks.
Other people who are not speculating but eagerly awaiting bubble rubble are:
People who were born too late.
People who elected to attend college rather than buy earlier.
People who sold to support a career and chose not to buy back in.
etc.
My thoughts as well. $5,500 monthly will get a pretty nice house pluce acreage, although there may be soime incredible advantage to downtown Pheonix I am not thinking of (WTF?).
Looks like St. Louis might be in on the game (hopefully, I’d like to buy sometime in the near future). Granted 140k is chump change compared to what some of you guys are facing but the appreciation the past few years has still been out of control.
1) David Liarreah and Leslie Appleton Young are driving along a road at night
2) They are speeding to get to the next rah rah session to stem the tide in CA
3) As they round a bend in the road there in the middle of the road is a raccoon
4) LAY is driving and swerves to avoid the animal
5) They both die as the car runs into the granite countertop of a new McMansion
6) NAR loses its two biggest mouth pieces and nobody is there to spin the bubble burst
7) Without all the rah rah the news becomes more bearish on RE
House prices fall and people just walk away from their homes
9) Consumers stop spending
10) Layoffs
11) The stock market crashes and my 401K is just a fraction of what it was
12) FED starts stoking M3 and dollars become worthless
13) Foreign investors panic and pull out of U.S.
14) Banks start going bellyup
15) The bank where I have my 200K from the sale of my house goes bellyup
16) I am left with only 100k (insured by government) after the bank collapses
17) Government defaults on insuring money in collapsed banks (I lose my remaining 100K)
18) My company goes out of business
19) Company pension fund was maxed out in RE holdings and is gone
20) The government to up the “War on Terror” and cuts back SS payments
21) I get a small monthly SS check and a bit from the ruins of my 401K
22) But by now we have Argentina style hyperinflation and my dollars are used to stoke the fire in the refugee camp where I now live
23) My friend who bought gold coins to barter with is followed home and killed for his gold coins
24) Microsoft announces Vista service pack update 12….but by now nobody cares
25) Hillary Clinton wins the electon (5% turnout) and promises a “piece of bread and a cup of soup for all”
The sweetest thing about this housing bubble crash is that after a lifetime of cushiness, the baby boomers are finally going to get their comeuppance. Hey boomers — you thought just b/c you were a homeowner you were going to have retirement handed to you on a silver platter, but you were WRONG. this whole housing bubble was just another way for the boomers to suck the life out of younger people. not that younger people weren’t gullible enough to fall for it — most of them were — .
in some ways I really want to be a homeowner, but with the rising property taxes, mediocre to lousy schools, and poisonous atmosphere of so many suburbs, i’m wondering if i’ll ever get the gumption to actually close on a home.
I’m a boomer, rented for 10 years after losing in the previous RE bubble and my assets are well diversified to last me through the economic collapse we’ll see in a few years. I’ll be able to live without a job for 8 years if I lose my job Monday morning - and that’s with my own savings. My fellow boomers won’t be able to count on me either to pay for their retirement. Of those who have 401ks and IRAs, the average amount in them is a modest $50,000. A boomer with $50,000 in retirement and an overinflated house will have to eat dogfood, I’m ‘fraid.
“The sweetest thing about this housing bubble crash is that after a lifetime of cushiness, the baby boomers are finally going to get their comeuppance.”
Well Kathleen, I’m a babyboomer who will be debt free in 5 short years. My husband makes under 6 figures, I stay at home with 2 youngins (I supported him while he was getting his 2nd degree) We only bought in 6 short years ago. You speak of boomers whining but you seem to have learned well. We got to this point making decisions that weren’t easy. We left friends and what we knew behind to move to a place that made more fiscal sense to us. I hated it here as it’s culturally very different from what we left behind. We probably saved our future. If you haven’t been able to see what you needed to do or decided you couldn’t make those same choices….that’s your fault, not ours. Be responsible for what you have done to get yourself there. That’s the path out!
When I pay off that mortgage before I’m 50 I’ll think about you dear…..with your cell phones, i-pod, and $100 cable and what are you driving? I’m sure there are reasons you feel trapped but those problems are yours. Awww! That feels better.
upstater, you won’t be thinking about “me, dear”. the whole point of my post was that other people in my generation are trapped, but not me, mostly b/c i haven’t bought a house yet (instead i have savings). there is no reason to take anything on this blog personally. btw, sorry you’re in debt.
Brad Delong is a Berkeley macro professor who was Deputy Undersecretary to the Treasury under Lawrence Summers (Clinton’s cabinet), with former graduate student advisees at high places in DC. His take on the risks facing the economy should be taken seriously, as he is a superb policy analyst with close ties to Washington insiders. I especially admire the fact that he has seen the same light that many regulars here have seen, and does not mince words about the situation we face:
——————————————————————————————–
Never say that a recession is coming. Say only that a recession is here, or that there might be a recession on the way. Which, in fact, is what I’m saying today. As of the beginning of August 2006, a recession is not here, and I’m not going to violate my own rule by saying one is coming. But there is a good chance — for the first time since 2003 — that there might be a recession in progress six months from now.
Why? Three factors: 1) A Federal Reserve that finds itself with less inflation-fighting credibility than it thought it had; 2) upward pressure on inflation from rising energy and, perhaps, import prices; and 3) millions of middle-class homeowners who for too long have treated their houses as gigantic ATMs, using home equity loans and refinancing to generate extra spending money.
if our landlord says we have to move ASAP because the house is being reposessed, what are our rights? In terms of how long we can stay and try and find another place? Sometimes renting is not always best…
It depends a bit on the state where you’re living, but for most states their law says that in the moment the house is repossesed (foreclosed), your lease is ended. Before that moment, your lease is valid and you don’t have to move, and afterwards the old landlord is irrelevant, so don’t care what he or her says you should do. Instead, contact the mortgage holder now and see if you can negotiate an extension of the lease. They might be interested in getting that extra money, but THEY might want you out ASAP.
“But, the housing market depends on long rates, not short rates. Mortgages are long-term debt.”
You know, I used to think that…however, aren’t some of the big coastal areas’ prices dependent on an ever growing number of “exotic” loan products (Option-ARM, interest only, very low teaser rates)…and aren’t those exotics tied to short term rates? In other words, can’t Ben B. re-spike the punch bowl (with 151 even) by lowering short-term rates, lowering rates for Option-ARMs and I/O ARMs?
(Sorry for the double post, but I am truly interested in what effect a drop in short term rates could have to help those that use “extreme financing” to buy a house…and possibly prolong the bubble).
You have a point; that is, teaser ARM rates are much more tightly linked to the Fed Funds rate than, say, thirty-year fixed mortgage rates. But IMO the Fed board does not see it in their interest to encourage another group of greater fools to buy homes they cannot afford using ARMs, which are supposedly only appropriate for wealthy buyers who need the flexibility to vary their loan repayment stream, as doing so only increases systemic risk for a bad consumption-driven recession up the road. And besides, the Fed has bigger worries — like the risk that foreign credit might dry up and the dollar might tank if their resolve to fight inflation is not credible.
I was at a party yesterday where the conversation turned, naturally, to real estate. But the discussion was about additions (as everyone there - except me - was a homeowner). A couple who just moved into the neighborhood 6 months ago (read: bought at the peak - I kept my mouth shut on that) was comparing their home to another’s. New couple was lamenting that they don’t have the nice additions that old couple does and said they were going to take out a home loan to do so. Another couple (who moved in just a couple of years ago) also chimed in that they want to build on to be like everyone else. Note this couple’s home already has a 3-season room addition. They are also so far in debt, it’s frightening (would keep me awake every night if I were in their situation).
I was just shocked to hear it all. I said, “Is it just impossible for anyone to be satisfied with what they have in the present? I’d give my right arm to live in one of these homes - without any addition.” I was then raked over the coals about how these people have high expectations and lofty goals and how that’s a GOOD thing and to think otherwise would be settling. It made me want to vomit.
The only couple who I felt were worthy of feeling this way was old couple. They’ve lived there 10 years and every time they want something (an addition, a deck, a remodeled kitchen), they SAVE UP FIRST and then proceed. That’s totally cool with me. But to go further and further into debt to make your master bedroom bigger is just stupid IMO. Cripes all you do is sleep and have sex there.
Man I hope that 1997 values x 1.20 formula mentioned this weekend comes true. Guess what? I would actually be able to live in that neighborhood were that to be the case. And then I could start saving up for my peer-pressure addition.
I have nothing against folks who add on to their homes in order to better accomodate their life style preferences, PROVIDED that the home improvements are within their financial means, without the implicit assumption that a high rate of future home price inflation to pay off the note. But I am afraid that the taxpayers will ultimately get to pay for lots of these additions in the form of some kind of govt bailout for those who could not really afford them and end up going BK…
“Is it just impossible for anyone to be satisfied with what they have in the present? ”
——————————————————–
No. They are entitled to have everything their heart desires because they made the smart decision to buy a home. HELOC it up the ying-yang and let appreciation pay it off. Take a ride on the money train.
Property here in Salinas is not going to change quickly overnight in spite of the increased listings, why? Because housing with 5 bedrooms is pending sales because multifamilies are being allowed to buy into the properties as ‘affordable housing’….you just put one family in and then the rest move in to make the payments. SFH neighborhoods look like apartment complexes. City doesn’t mind, they retain their tax base and when one family moves out another will move in.
How are some of these possible? I’m browsing the “under $250K” because, well, that’s my market. How does a property list for $325,000 and sell for $105,000? Or even $389K to $185K?! I have lowball envy for sure.
As someone has occasionally pointed out here, the govt’s modus operandi these days seems to be, “Privatize profits, socialize risk.” A new FHA bill designed to increase the number of 100% financed buyers and increase FHA exposure to unaffordably-priced markets, seems to fit that description. Party on, dudes!
————————————————————————————————–
NATION’S HOUSING KENNETH HARNEY
House approves bill giving FHA new lease on life
August 6, 2006
WASHINGTON – Moderate-income home buyers got a big boost from Congress at the end of July, when the House voted 415-7 to approve a bill revitalizing the federal government’s biggest mortgage program – the Federal Housing Administration (FHA).
The bill, which now awaits Senate action, would allow the FHA to offer zero-down-payment loans for the first time, increase permissible mortgage amounts substantially in high-cost markets, and provide low-interest rates and consumer protections that are rarely available from “subprime” mortgage lenders.
Purchased in July 2004 for $450K and now asking $395K with all the noise from I-5 you can stand to be thrown in for free. Newly built in 1986. Get yours now.
At least this seller is getting more realistic about getting out. He’s had to reduce his asking to $2K above what he paid for it in September 2005 according to the County Assessor’s office. This was a month ago on 7/5. Hurry, the realtor says it won’t last. Is it that the construction is that shoddy or maybe that price won’t be the last? I’m not sure what ‘beatuiful’ is all about, but I’m guessing the owner is taking a beating on this one.
This little flipper flopped. Purchased in March of ‘05 for $530K and redecorated, but no takers it seems for this 1032 sq ft slice of paradise at $499K. They’re now asking $30K below what they paid for this albatross of a box.
The House passed a bill called “Expanding American Home-ownership Act of 2006″ (HR 5121).
It seeks to expand the upper limit on FHA loans and give 100% loans to people who can’t now afford because of rising home prices.
In just the past couple of months, we’ve heard NAR/Lereah pleading with Bernanke to keep interest rates low because they are affecting “price sensitive markets” (ie. home prices are coming down).
Then a couple weeks ago we heard legislators pleading with Bernake to “keep his eye on the housing market”. Which to me indicates that Legislators also are aware that the price of homes is coming down.
Therefore, call me cynical, but the timing of this Bill is very suspect.
It appears that the Gov. is in collusion to float the housing market by putting more and more people into homes they cannot afford without nutty loans.
The Bill goes before the Senate next.
I’ve tried to locate where to make comments on the US. gov site but haven’t figured out how to do it.
Name:Ben Jones Location:Northern Arizona, United States To donate by mail, or to otherwise contact this blogger, please send emails to: thehousingbubble@gmail.com
PayPal is a secure online payment method which accepts ALL major credit cards.
Adding significantly to fall index puts in this morning rally.
Good move I think, I am short index funds. Notice that M2 is up 10% on a annual basis the last few months. Ben is afraid of deflation. With the $US down this morning, it will be difficult for the Fed not raise 1/4 point after flooding the system with liquidity. Then say we will watch and wait.(go on hold)
Being a HUGE debtor nation, the $US is a real problem.
We are only a huge debtor nation largely thanks to Ben’s predecessor, some of whose most easily deciphered economic commentary in recent years (clearly directed at dumb sheep) suggested that the low savings rate might not be a problem, due to the magic of the wealth effect brought on by ever-increasing asset prices. Of course, never mind that negative real interest rates tend to encourage rampant speculation in various risky assets, driving the savings rate to negative, the risk premium to the floor and asset prices through the roof.
“We are only a huge debtor nation largely thanks to Ben’s predecessor, some of whose most easily deciphered economic commentary in recent years (clearly directed at dumb sheep) suggested that the low savings rate might not be a problem, due to the magic of the wealth effect brought on by ever-increasing asset prices.”
Oh good grief, you got me started. A female talk radio host of who I agree most of the time on economic issues was saying how the great this economy is because real estate is doing well, people are able to buy more homes. I am of the same political party as that host, and the host was tying real estate values with the political party. I’m laughing by that time. And I know this bubble is going to make that political party lose a lot of votes when the crash comes. It’s embarrasing to me and sensible people in our party who have enough economic common sense to recognize an overinflated asset and potential economic collapse. The other political party is much worse and its economic prescriptions are nothing but faster acting poison. Tweedle dee and tweedle dumber.
What do you use to short the S & P?
Spiders (AMEX: SPY)
What advantage is there to buying the short products before the Fed meeting?
You get a better price if you assume as I do there will be a 15 minute rally after the meeting and then kaboom.
Now this trade I understand. Like today’s silly NFP action. I don’t know how many people were taking the under (est 150k, actual lower) saying the market would pop then fade. Talk about divorced from fundamentals. The same number of people were employed this morning as last night but people think this is tradeable data. And it is but only as a weird sort of meta indicator of investor herd mentality.
Rydex funds -RYTPX
TxChick –
What do you think of PEET as a short candidate? Up by 5X in recent years, and heavily dependent on housing-ATM cash for growth.
GS
Not here. Look at that candle from yesterday. Looks like it bottomed short term. If I were going to short that, I’d try for a partial position at the breakdown point of ~28 and add if it hit 30-31.
Short a coffee stock? Are you kidding? Coffee has only ever been up. Some of the companies that service it may fail, but coffee has been the best investment ever since discovery. No other drug has been such a hit. Never bet against coffee.
I’m on my 3rd espresso, had two cups of kona.
I second that advice, don’t ever bet against coffee.
grim
You sound like financial advisors in 1999. “Short an internet stock? Are you kidding? Technology has only ever been up. Never bet against the internet”.
The point is, the world needs both technology and coffee. And housing. Shorting a stock or a sector doesn’t mean you think the sector is a dinosaur…it means that you think the market is overpaying. And yes, the market overpays for coffee too, just like housing and technology.
“Never bet against coffee”? Honestly, Mole Man, you sound eerily like David Learah with that quote. You sure you don’t want to take that one back?
Fed is draining liquidity into the meeting which is rather curious. It seems like the recent rally may be heading straight into a brick wall.
I suspect a “Black Friday / Monday / Tuesday” this October myself. I would rather it didn’t happen, but hisotry says there is a good chance of it this year.
http://tinyurl.com/nbf66
regarding “black Friday,” pundits make that predicion every year. Two words on stocks: Trailing Stops!
er “prediction.”
Anyone who puts all their eggs in one basket is taking too big of a gamble. Those who are purely in treasuries could take a major hit if we get hyperinflation (Middle East oil fields are peaked and production is going to have to fall). Those who are purely into gold could take a hit too - lack of consumer spending due to years of heavy debt could cause massive unemployment and price drops in consumer goods, as well as a 60% or more drop in the S & P 500 index. A risk neutral portfolio is probably the best place for your savings outside your tax deferred retirement accounts.
Agree 100% Bill. We all know that financially unstable times are ahead. None of us knows which way it will go. The million dollar question is, what is a balanced portfolio? I’ve currently got my “balance” like this: 55% short term CD’s, 25% equities, 15% precious metals, 5% commodities. 0% real estate!
Anyone have comments on what I’m doing wrong?
Ha my portfolio is like yours except less PM. I will add back RE when this bubble blows over. Other than that I just can’t bring myself into a more balanced condition until the yield curve stops inverting.
It seems like I agree with most everyone on this Blog,
so different from discussing face to face my ideas with co-workers. This has never happened before? kinda werid.
We all hope (and some of us pray) that the economic collapse will be far enough away that we can prepare ourselves and families for it. With a risk neural portfolio and living well below your means for several years, your net worth (adjusted to inflation) will grow with leaps and bounds. I’m one of the fortunate few who is making quite a lot of money in my engineering field and I have very few expenses (because of roommates). I’m hoping all the rest of you have a good financial cushion as well. I’m not saying my good income will last. I may go back to the same middle class income in a few years, due to political decisions by a new regime in America. That is a huge reason I live well below my means. It’s not from pessimism, but from recognizing that everything operates in cycles. If 99% of Americans realized how cycles run everything, maybe there would be far fewer FBs.
Hey Bill, you do defense work? I used to back in the early 1990’s lots of microwave stuff for Loral, but then we had a bit of a correction in Cali due to a change in politics. Plus a housing downturn because of that. ugh.
I slowly got into commercial comminications work and was a part of a hugh bubble, I was working on the Physical layer fiber optics at 10 gb/s. Saw my Conexant stock go to 130 a share, whooo hooo, fortunately I sold some. It was too high, just like my Townhome in 2006.
crazy world and high tech is just as crazy, changes all the time. maybe thats why I’m so paranoid?
I knew that tech bubble wasn’t going to last, we were selling, I mean shipping muxs to lucent that they didn’t even need, just to get it on the quarter’s books so presumably the VP’s could get a big bounus. Lucent shipped most of them back. hahaha
Cactus,
Yes, I’ve been in the defense sector since graduating from college in 1985. I was a government employee up to 1996 and then I started finding out I could make money by going private sector. I had some work at Ford Aerospace in Newport Beach a few times (before it became Loral). Is that the one where you were? Yes, in my view, good things don’t last. I figure when the regime changes in 2008, my income could easily drop down to $70,000 per year. But I’ll accept it if it happens. What I wonder about is people who do not plan for cycles. Political cycles by either party distort the market, sometimes for good and sometimes not so good. In the long run, government planning is a loser deal. I try to smooth out the surprises that those politicians put forth by saving as much as I can. If you see me drive around in a shiny red Porsche, it will only be because I could afford to replace it with a brand new one every year from gains on my investments, not from my job. But I’m not at that point yet. I am at the point where i can pay for a roof over my head solely by my investments (risk neutral).
I worked for Loral at a facility ( Wavecom ) in the San Fernando valley. It was fun but it ended in 1992.
You are smart to save the defense industry can be cyclical. I was out of defense by the mid 1995 although my last job in Cali was getting some DARPA stuff.
HURRICANE INSURANCE CRISIS | FIRST IN A SERIES
State failures leave policyholders without a net
By Kathy Bushouse
South Florida Sun-Sentinel
August 6, 2006
Florida’s property insurance market is a mess, despite legislators’ attempts to fix it for more than a decade.
The price of home and condominium insurance has soared to dizzying levels. Insurers have dumped longtime customers and slashed coverage for others. The state’s home insurer of last resort now is the biggest property insurer in Florida.
More and more homeowners and businesses are forced to ponder whether they can afford the Sunshine State anymore.
Much of this is the Legislature’s handiwork.
Fearing any action that would drive insurers out of the state, lawmakers have shown for years they won’t stand up to the insurance companies.
This year, with great fanfare, legislators directed $715 million in tax money to help close the $1.7 billion deficit at state-run Citizens Property Insurance Corp. All Florida homeowners still are on the hook for the remaining shortfall of almost $1 billion. Yet legislators allowed insurance companies to raise rates up to 10 percent without getting state approval and cleared the way for drastic price increases for many of Citizens’ customers.
“The casualty is the consumer,” said state Sen. Ron Klein, D-Boca Raton. “The Legislature has made the continuing mistake, year in and year out, of giving almost everything the insurance companies want to them, with the view that `Hey, if we do this, it will make more (competition).’
“How many years does it take? It’s over a decade where this thinking hasn’t worked,” said Klein, who is running for Congress.
Over the next 12 months in South Florida, many people will see their homeowner’s insurance bills more than double.
Ruth Berge, a divorced mother of two in Jupiter, is working a third job to pay additional expenses, including insurance.
“If I can’t make this work, I’ll have to [move] …,” the second-generation Floridian said.
The insurance market quagmire started in 1992 when Hurricane Andrew slammed into southwestern Miami-Dade County. Insurers realized their rates weren’t high enough to handle South Florida’s storm risk, and they had too many home policies concentrated in certain areas.
In the aftermath, state insurance officials and legislators allowed insurers to raise rates and slash coverage because thehurricane caused $16 billion in losses — that’s $22 billion in today’s dollars.
The promise from insurers then was simple: Allow much higher insurance prices and we’ll be able to handle catastrophes down the road. The state complied, approving big rate increases.
“I consider that a total renege of what we were promised,” said Robert Hunter, director of insurance for the Consumer Federation of America and a former Texas insurance commissioner. “The big rate increases we granted back in the mid-90s were supposed to bring stability at times like this … I feel like they lied to us.”
Florida insurers say claims from the eight hurricanes in 2004 and 2005 wiped out their surpluses, even though they collected higher home and condo premiums for more than a decade after Andrew.
“We paid out $35 billion. It’s a hell of a lot more money than we took in those two years,” said Sam Miller, executive vice president of the Florida Insurance Council, an industry trade group. “It seems to me that we’re taking a hell of a loss. And we’re still here.”
Watch for the Fed to Pause
By Tony Crescenzi
RealMoney.com Contributor
8/4/2006 9:42 AM EDT
URL: http://www.thestreet.com/p/rmoney/tcrescenziblog/10301789.html
The employment report seals the deal on a pause in the Fed’s interest rate hikes; a continuation of the trend would spell the end of hikes for the current cycle. For four months, job growth has averaged just 112,000 a month, a level that would drive the jobless rate upward over time, given that the labor force grows roughly 150,000 per month.
The jobless rate might already be on an upward trac, having risen to 4.8% in July from a five-year low of 4.6% in June. While fitting with the Federal Reserve’s forecast for a rise in the jobless rate, the current pace of job growth could drive the jobless rate over 5% earlier than the end of 2007, as the Fed is currently forecasting. This is a clear basis for a pause on top of an already-strong case.
The current pace of economic growth is desirable given that it is what is necessary to wring the economy of inflation pressures. It normally takes at least two quarters of subpar growth to begin to whittle inflation pressures downward. With today’s data, and in combination with a plethora of other data, it seems that a second quarter of subpar growth is now at hand.
While this is good news for equity investors, if the sub-par growth continues into future quarters without any sign of change, profit concerns could begin to replace the ebullience of the end of the Fed’s interest rate hikes.
My guess is that if there is no rate increase the market will jump up for a day or two and then it will start tanking again. The market is already anticipating that there will be no increase and most of the rally will be played out by the time of the meeting. If there is a rate increase, and they make a statement indicating that it might be the last one, then the same thing might happen. But the end result in any case will be a return to the bear market within a short time.
Yes. I’m getting in early just in case something happens over the weekend.
I am fully confident that your puts will do really well, even if we see a jump over the next week it will be erased quickly. I would buy puts myself today if I could talk my husband into it, and more next week if the market was up higher.
My husband is not allowed to participate in these decisions He just enjoys the money. He’s like one of those guys in the NY Times article but I do make him work some to earn his keep.
TxChick,
You remind me of academic research (by Terrence Odean) that suggests women make better investment decisions than men
http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/odean/behavior.html
Txchick trades like men (lots of risk) and short timeframes. The reason women in the study beat the men is that they operated more like Warren Buffett.
I disagree bluto. The reason women beat men is because they are more capable of checking their ego and emotions at the door.
Women are better risk-takers because they have no problem minimizing loss. Whereas most of us men have the George Bush philosopy “We ain’t cuttin’ and runnin’! I’d rather lose a million troops than admit I was wrong!”
If you go to the actual study, men and women make equally poor investment choices (differences between securities sold vs securites bought was negative and not statistically signficant), but women trade about 2/3 as much as men accounting for most of the differences. On a per trade basis men and women’s underperformance was 1 basis point per month different.
http://faculty.gsm.ucdavis.edu/~bmbarber/BoysWillBeBoys.pdf
The good part starts on page 277. My conclusion was drawn from the authors on 278.
The main reason was they trade less frequently, one for buffett none for txchick (you can’t trade options without pretty heavy turnover). Other studies have indicated that there is a small subset of investors who consistently outperform in most markets but that their gains are more like rents for sniffing out price imbalances rathat than what most people would consider investing.
Market goes where it wants to go. The analysts will justify the movement with blabber either way. I believe Kim’s thoughts will play out, in that the market players want it to go up, so it will - but both reasons are the wrong ones.
Either the Fed pauses (because JOBS reports look bad) giving people a reason to have one more drink, or the Fed doesn’t pause (because INFLATION looks bad) giving the people a reason to have one more drink (they think it’ll be the last). In both situations, the market is just making an excuse to move in a certain direction, given information that very well could lead it to a less rosy long term outlook.
Works the same going down. In a receeding market, a favorable jobs report can still send the market lower because people think Fed will stop lowering (or start raising) rates.
Economics, in my opinion, is psychology first, numbers second.
This is what I like about Elliot Wave theory, the theory is based on the idea that the stock market is a giant barometer that shows social mood. When the social mood turns down or more conservative, it is immediately shown in the stock market, but the signs in the economy show up later in a recession or depression.
We Rent!
The guys at the Fed must have ditched the rational expectations paradigm in favor of the new paradigm of psychological economics, because their game plan seems to be based on the ability to manipulate a critical mass of sheep into silly actions like investing in second, third, and fourth homes they don’t really need in order to keep driving the price to ever more unaffordable levels. Of course, the purpose of the housing price inflation thus created is to allow consumers to unlock ever more wealth out of their homes through the magic of the home equity ATM machine, in order to keep the economy humming.
Does anyone else think this Ponzi scheme might some day fail?
We need an increase of at least 1/4 pt. Better if it’s 1/2 pt. Let’s scrub the HELOC and ARM losers out of the action.Leraeh can suck on a big one.Let me check with Suzanne, eh?
The market may sky rocket for a day or two until people start noticing the dollar tanking and gold and silver sky rocketing! Too much debt to support the dollar with low interest rates.
If the FED pauses it means the economy is in danger of a recession, if they raise it means too much inflation. Not so great either way as I see it.
Agreed. They are behind the curve either way. They are not in control, just running after a train that has already left the station.
I still think we are going to get 25 BP next week. But I am not a financial guru.
The Mogabmo Guru agreed with you, at least as a couple of weeks ago. However, the employment report has clouded the picture, even though it should not have — the difference between expected and actual jobs created could have been pure statistical noise, yet Wall Street commentators siezed on the discrepancy in order to twist BB’s arm into pausing. It will be interesting to see whether he takes the bait to respike the punchbowl.
I was also interested to see so many of the Fed minions come out and waffle on the rate hike in the press. I think someone here very cleverly pointed out they might be performing some PR that “I was not the bad guy”.
I am also interested that the bond market really seems to setting its own tune. If anything this has to scare the Fed because it loudly implys that they are no longer in charge. A good article on iTulip (if a bit on the money nerd side) has some information on some suggested mechanics behind the disconnect.
http://tinyurl.com/p7fa4
Fantastic. Thanks!
A “missing link”.
OK, say the Fed is “one and done”. The refrain from the real estate/mortgage lending community has been Buy/Refi now before rates go up. Say the Fed holds at 5.5%, and you’re a buyer. You gonna buy now while rates are still “historically low”, or you gonna hold out hoping they go back down? Expect the real estate crowd to say “you can always refi later when rates go down” etc. etc. ad naseum. Maybe the Fed will go into a protracted hold period while the FB’s slowly fall off the tree, and the buyer’s are in “wait and see” mode.
The Fed will pause. The bond market is already forecasting rate cuts. Bye bye dollar…hello, gold.
Yeah, the conundrum forces the Fed’s hand. TxChick, smart play on the puts. The probabilities for stock market declines within 6 to 12 months is very high. Bulls, go ahead and load up on 5% Tbills and loose money, guaranteed! Me? Happy long on Au, shhhh!
I’m thinking we might see a really scary crash in the fall. 4 figure Dow decline.
It makes the hair stand on the back of my neck when thinking of what is possible in the next 12 months. I am prepared for worst-case scenarios now, not just a stock market “crash”. Take your pick on any number of financial, terrorist, war, pandemic or natural disasters. Fortunately, all preparations have a recreational aspect as well as providing peace-of-mind…
I agree, the fall will be ugly. I’ve jokingly posted “Beware the ides of October” as we’re in for something ugly by then. With the current state of the economy, Fred Hooper is right… all we need is one shock to the system and the real estate, commodities, and stock markets are going to be hit hard. Maybe it will be a hurricane through the gulf (or Florida). Maybe the middle east conflict spooks us. Or the bird flu gets scarier…
Its scary to see the markets so unstable that one bad disturbance is all we need for a drop.
Neil
Neil, it doesn’t need a shock. It will go down on its own, but you can be sure the media will pick anything it can find to blame it on.
(from the movie “Twister”) “It’s already here!”
Google news articles on “amazon drought”. Long story short, one more year of drought = no more Amazon rain forest. Very scary if true, worse than terrorism, bird flu, mideast (unless someone goes nuclear). Don’t worry too much about it though; there’s nothing any human can do at this point.
“Very scary if true,…”
Relax — it is not true!
If stocks and RE are both declining, then I don’t think people who hold Tbills will be losing.
He never said they would. He said they’d be loosing.
Ooh. Loosing my mind….
Get your mind loose!
in the last 5 years or so a lot has been happening in the markets that doesn’t make any sense. This is a time where it is better to step aside and let the market come to its senses (which might as well take many years …).
I agree. I’m still thinking the people who are able to save money will load up on one or more of the places to park money: money market funds, short term CDs, T-bills, and savings accounts (for the average Joe renter). Consumer spending will decrease, and stocks will drop. All that besides real estate prices dropping. On the other hand energy prices are going to skyrocket for the next 20 years. Inflation and deflation. Precious metals, and perhaps laddering with a mixture of T-bills and notes are probably the safest ways to weather this storm ahead. Keep renting!
If you think energy is going to continue up why not buy energy stocks?
FDG. 12% yield.
BB will chose to save the FB’s
the dollar will be toast
WEEEEEEEEEEEEE I’m bullish
Unless you are holding a crystal ball there, care to say why?
While you’re at it, how’s my hairline going to be in 10 years?
(unless you are being sarcastic, which I often miss, then plz disregard ; )
Easy call - receding!! =)
Guess I’m the perma-bear on this one. With Australia, Europe and the UK just having raised their rates, I don’t think it’s possible for BB to take a pass. This talk in the media, nervously giving all the reasons why a hike isn’t necessary, seems to me much the same rhetoric we’ve heared before each of the last two hikes.
Further, Ben needs to create a persona. Right now, he looks like Gentle Ben — a bad ID for the daunting job ahead, if he plans to keep it. He needs to buy some cigars and practice scowling and finger-pointing up at the gods of Congress.
I think a .25 increase is coming and would not be totally shocked if a .50 stake were whipped out from under the cape.
He whips out 50 basis points and there will be an outcry from Wall Street as has been seldom heard before. On the other hand, the dollar will skyrocket.
The futures market’s predication today is about a 33% chance of a 25 bpp rate hike, and a 66% chance of a pause. There’s really no chance for a 50bpp hike.
You mean that the market doesn’t predict a 50 basis point hike (or, predicts a .00 probability of one). Can’t really say NO chance, right?
at least in the EU, the 0.25% rate increase was already a done deal. Home prices made their biggest jump in several years over the last three months, both in the UK and Netherlands (countries with the biggest pricegains in this bubble) and probably other EU markets as well.
Experience in EU shows that higher rates from the ECB do NOT translate into higher mortgage rates (or rates on savings accounts). After 4x 0.25% uptick from the ECB, rates in the Netherlands have barely moved, maybe around 0.3% total.
So, the rate from the central banks no longer seems relevant for the market; they know the banks will do everything necessary to keep the easy money flowing and the housing bubble growing.
As for the US, I think the Treasury charts say it all: the 10-year treasury broke down today and the homebuilders index has every reason to jump. This not only signals and end to the rate increases, it signals the market is convinced that lower rates are around the corner.
Without a real depression (which is a possibility, but unproven up to now) I’m pretty sure there will be an echo bubble in many parts of the US next year.
I’ve been thinking the same thing, as I’ve watched the EU the last couple of years. Not certain it will happen, but you are right. There is a chance anyway.
Ugh, you maybe right though. More inflation.
If BB raises rates the housing and consumer markets will CRASH big time. If he lowers rates the dollar will start to crash.
I think they will try to pospone the above as long as possible then start to lower rates due to the slowing economy. Early ‘07 at the latest.
How long until “SHTF” registers on Google Trends? Maybe another 9 months?
Treasuries Look Expensive
By Tony Crescenzi
RealMoney.com Contributor
8/4/2006 10:11 AM EDT
URL: http://www.thestreet.com/p/rmoney/tcrescenziblog/10301798.html
Recent economic data, combined with today’s payroll report, weigh heavily against the need for additional interest rate hikes. They do not yet, however, provide a basis for an interest rate cut. As I said earlier, the current rate of growth is actually desirable and this will continue to be the case for a little longer. A speeding up of growth would be premature; inflation would accelerate.
With this in mind, I find the Treasury market a bit pricey at the moment, as yields have fallen below the funds rate by amounts that tend to occur only when an interest rate cut is near. In fact, if the 10-year were to fall to 4.75%, it would be 50 basis points below the funds rate, something that tends to occur only when an interest rate cut is imminent. Because it’s not, a further decline in Treasury yields looks unsustainable. It’s rare enough for Treasuries to be below the fed funds rate; this is only the fourth time in 16 years that the 10-year has dipped below the funds rate. On all other occasions, an interest rate cut was delivered within six months.
While an interest rate cut might occur within six months, a cut is not imminent, which is what is needed to justify a 10-year Treasury at a spread of 50 basis points below the fed funds rate.
“In fact, if the 10-year were to fall to 4.75%, it would be 50 basis points below the funds rate, something that tends to occur only when …”
a recession is imminent.
Whointhehell would buy this ugly dog? 4.75% for 10 loooong years when you can no cost buy a CD for 8 months at 5.76%. Anybody think even with the trouble acomin’ for the banks that these 10yr will be paying a lower rate in the spring? My money is where my mouth is. These will be 5.2% by fall. Combination of risk premium and inflation.
Your pension funds!!!
The 10 year is an excellent short opportunity now. Almost as good as the S&P or the DAX.
interesting but I think the situation is simple:
The market is convinced that rates will be going down within a few months; all other explanations (like the one from mr. Crescenzi which basically says that the market is wrong) have history against them.
ummmm, thestreet is writing to its audience who has been trained to think that the market is linked to interest rates. I think that interest rates would have to go up 1 or 2 percent more before the return rates of interest versus equities would start competing. today, many have tax free investments and that makes equities more competitive even with rising interest rates.
well vangard has a fund VAAPX that allocates between stocks and Bonds depending on yields and estimated earnings and other things, etc. It has been all stocks for years now. I have noticed that usually when the treasury bond curve inverts we get a recession, a good time to buy bonds. But it seems most experts don’t like bonds now and would rather be in stocks. Including this Fund. So as usual I’m confused. ugh again.
If you’re a glutton for punishment, here’s Maryann Haggerty today at 1:00 in the Wash. Post, taking your real estate questions.
http://tinyurl.com/en8lr
I read the chat. It was lame. Maryann only let through comments about what kind of house people used to live in/need to live in. We want bubble talk and real life stories of people in the market now. None of this “i used to live in a bedroom with 2 sisters” crap. She stinks.
Washington Post Real Estate editor is chatting online today at 1 EST, if anyone’s interested. Chats are usually entertaining!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2006/07/21/DI2006072101250.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/02/AR2006080201615.html?referrer=emailarticle
attributes the condo clientele w/ the killing of Clarendon’s “funky” vibe.
I cannot stand her moronic rants, she adds zero value to any meaningful factual discussion of the RE market. Previously she was talking about the summer boom now she denies any knowledge of it, but is aware of an August quiet in the market, she is a shill for the RE pimps. Makes me want to throw up on her face.
gross.
In response to an article about unaffordable housing in Bozeman, MT, I posted a comment referencing the housing bubble. The author’s reply to me seems to amount to “it’s different here.” Her reply is below. But is it possible that mountain resort-type locations will always be unaffordable? Think Jackson Hole, WY.
By the way, a HBB field agent around Bozeman calculated that about 1 in 33 homes in the Bozeman area are now for sale. Unlike Jackson Hole (surrounded by National Forests and a National Park), there are miles and miles of buildable land west and north.
The original article is about “Inclusionary Housing.” I bet Cote loves it already!
New West Bozeman article
Marcia says:
I’ll give you one word in return: decades. That’s how persistent Bozeman’s inadequacy of affordable housing has been. It has remained true in profoundly varying market conditions and was evident right before the bubble started expanding (at the beginning of this long growth cycle, when the city first studied and considered IH in 1994 and decided to try other approaches first). I agree with you there are signs of market softening and prices beginning to adjust, but prices would have to plummet spectacularly for home ownership to be in the price range of average workforce wages. And Bozeman shows every sign of continuing to be popular, to attract new residents because of its amazing setting, etc. Typical predictions are that its growth cycle may not always continue at the current record pace and may vacillate some but that Bozeman will continue to grow at a significant rate for many years. That will continue to put upward pressure on housing prices, even if occasional adjustments occur. Affordable housing is a nearly constant issue for growing communities, and it’s why so many in similar circumstances to Bozeman have adopted IH. After 27 years of addressing housing issues in Bozeman, I do not believe the need will cease, though the program target will doubtless need occasional adjustment as conditions change. And any practical alternatives for addressing our persistent affordability challenge certainly deserve attention, but Bozeman needs a mechanism to ensure steady, reliable creation of affordable housing along with higher-end housing as the community grows. IH in other communities meets that goal more effectively than any other approaches anyone has been able to identify so far.
I’m still laughing about this one: http://www.wtop.com/?nid=104&sid=869914 It seems that many of the new homeowners are so absolutely clueless about home ownership that when repairmen are finally called, they find “doors hung upside down. … more than one sliding pocket door that won’t open because someone nailed a picture on the wall and into the door” One homeowner tried to “spackle over wallpaper” and ultimately just tried to sand and smooth it so “nobody would notice.” Is anyone here surprised? Probably not, but I was laughing aloud and the whole office wanted to know what was so funny. Wait till these clowns try to sell their “investment!”
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/lgb/rfs/187454354.html
LOL…would you buy a house from this guy? Clearly he never got hooked on phonics…
GREAT OPPPORTUNITY, A DUPLEX OF EACH UNIT WITH, 2 BEDROOMS AND 1 BATH,GARAGE FOR 2 CARS,IN A VERY QUIET NEIGHBORNHOOD OF LONG BEACH, SALE OWNER TO OWNER, OWNER OFFER TO PAY SOME CLOSING COST , OR EITHER MAY PAY UP TO $10,000.00 DOLLARS FOR CLOSING COST, WE OFFER 100% FINANCING , EASY TO QUALIFY
AND IF YOU HAVE 10% DOWN PAYMENT WE CAN GET YOU A VERY LOW MONTHLY PAYMENT,
WE CAN GET YOU THERE IN LESS THE 30 DAYS, OWNER WANT TO MAKE THIS TRANSACTION QUICKLY AS ASAP. OWNER IS DESPERATE, PLEASE BE SERIUS ON THIS TRANSACTION
IF YOU ARE INTEREST PLEASE CONTACT
CIMAX HOME MORTGAGE INC
ASK FOR PABLO RODRIGUEZ
or e-mail at pablo.cimaxinc@yahoo.com
562-251-0139
VOICE MAIL 310-878-4758
“IN A VERY QUIET NEIGHBORNHOOD OF LONG BEACH”
The gangs there prefer the use of silencers.
…and a few of the motorcycles even have mufflers.
Very quiet neighborhood, except for the DAMN TRAIN TRACKS in your back yard!
Free sattelite radio?
This may be the proverbial final straw for some folks around the country. Already happening in the Inland Empire (CA.)
BTW, did they think cooling a 3000+sq home would be cheap?
HEAT WAVE; INLAND RESIDENTS SIMMER OVER HIGHER ELECTRIC BILLS//Cost of keeping cool now due and payable
MARY BENDER AND LESLIE BERKMAN
1536 words
11:23 am, 08/03/2006
The Press-Enterprise(Internal Content)
English
Aug. 2, 2006 — Inland residents who sweated through July’s triple-digit swelter now have swoon-worthy electric bills - some for several hundred dollars - to ponder.
Skyrocketing energy bills because of the heat storm’s record energy demand, coupled with rate increases, have sparked outrage and worry among Southern California Edison customers who wonder if conservation alone can bring them relief.
Reno Fontana, 53, of Rancho Mirage, said Edison billed him $1,005 for June 15 to July 14. “I was stunned and in disbelief. I didn’t know it was possible to go to four digits. What are we to do?” he said.
For the same period last year, his bill was $345.
“It is both because of the rate increases and heat that forced us to leave on the air conditioning 24 hours a day,” Fontana said. “It is like the perfect energy storm.”
To afford the bills, Fontana said he and his wife will have to change their lifestyle this summer, eliminating dinners out and weekend trips to the beach.
Edison spokesman Tom Boyd said the utility’s customer service agents received 13,919 bill inquiries in July, more than double the figure from July 2005. Customers primarily asked why was their bill so high, whether there was a billing or meter error, and what they could do to lower their bills.
“With increasing gasoline prices and energy bills, it is putting a stranglehold on your finances,” said Joanne Dopp, of Rancho Cucamonga. Last August, 2005’s hottest month, the family’s electric bill was $440, she said. Although they used less power last month, Edison told her their July bill will be $946, Dopp said.
In an effort to reduce electric use, Dopp said she drained the family spa, raised the air conditioning thermostat to 78 degrees and turned down the refrigerator temperature. She said she’ll probably empty and unplug a second refrigerator in the garage.
Eastvale resident Jane Anderson lives in a 3,400-squarefoot, two-story house. This month, her Edison bill was $738, a jump from the previous month’s total of $493.
Anderson fears her next bill - which will encompass July’s heat wave, when the mercury soared over 100 degrees on several days - could approach $1,000.
“A lot of people are saying they’re going to have to sell (their house), because they can’t afford it,” she said.
At a recent community meeting in Eastvale, residents asked a Southern California Edison representative if the utility could recalculate the “baseline” level on their bills - the modest allotment of daily and monthly electricity usage offered at the cheapest rate. Residents contended the baseline assigned for their community - in northwestern Riverside County - wasn’t realistic based on the Inland Empire’s arid climate, especially for homes in the 3,000-square-foot range.
“The baseline is absurdly low. I have complained for years on ours, and I’ve had (Edison) come out and check the meter,” Anderson said. “I just couldn’t figure out why (the bill) would constantly be high.”
BASELINE RATE VARIES
Jim Schichtl, Edison’s manager of rate design, said the baseline is intended to provide households only with enough electricity to meet basic necessities such as lighting and refrigerating food.
The baseline is figured at between 60 percent and 70 percent of the average electric consumption of homes and is approved by the California Public Utilities Commission, Schichtl said.
The baseline also takes into account climate differences within Edison’s territory, Schichtl said. Residential customers receiving basic service in Mira Loma, using no more than 15.4 kilowatt hours per day, can qualify for the lowest baseline rate. Households in Palm Desert can qualify even if their daily power use is as much as 47.6 kilowatt hours per day.
Schichtl said because average bills within each climate region are calculated every three years, the baseline is adjusted to reflect changes in lifestyles, such as preferences for consumer electronics.
Edison has 1.24 million residential customers in Riverside and San Bernardino counties.
Calimesa resident Heidi Johnston saw her bill - for mid-June to mid-July - skyrocket. She was charged $199 the previous cycle, and $495 for the current bill.
“I called the electric company the next day. I said: `Do you want to tell me why my bill (more than) doubled from last month?’ I was probably his 200th call,” Johnston said.
The Johnstons’ baseline allocation for the most recent billing period was 508 kilowatt hours, and the family used 2,047 kilowatt hours of electricity.
Other residents of the 480-unit mobile home community, Plantation on the Lake, fared much worse - and, on top of that, many are retired and living on fixed incomes, she said.
“Fortunately I work, so one way or another I’ll get my bills paid,” said Johnston, 47, who owns a flower shop in Calimesa. “But I live in a senior citizen park, and these seniors don’t have that kind of money. How are they going to pay this bill?”
EXTREME CONSERVATION TACTIC
The Joslyn Senior Center of the Cove Communities in Palm Desert has had to bear the increased electricity rates along with its clients.
The June bill at the center was $4,522, a huge leap from the $2,843 the nonprofit group paid in June 2005.
“That just about knocked me off my chair when I opened that bill up,” said Peter Rittenhouse, the group’s executive director.
To save energy, the center closes a third of the building for most of the summer and keeps the thermostat there near 90 degrees. The temperature in the occupied part of the building is usually set at 78 degrees. Fans whiz overhead.
Rittenhouse worried that if rates increase again next summer, he may be forced to close the center on summer weekends to save money.
Tom Hall, a PUC spokesman, said the reason for establishing electric rates in tiers that ascend with electricity consumption was to motivate households to practice conservation.
This year, Edison’s average residential rate has increased 13.4 percent because of rising natural gas prices. It also has approval for another rate hike averaging 6 percent for residential customers to finance improvement of its distribution and transmission system.
Because of the pain their customers are feeling from the current heat storm, Edison asked the Public Utilities Commission to defer the new rate increase from August until November. While awaiting PUC action, the utility said it is shelving the rate increase.
SOLAR ENERGY INTEREST UP
The Dopp and Fontana households plan to dodge future rate increases by investing in solar electric systems. Fontana said he and his wife will pay $75,000 for a system that he figures will pay for itself in utility bill savings within six years, after which they won’t be bothered by Edison rate hikes.
“We are drawing a line in the sand and that is it,” Fontana said. “I refuse to do this anymore.”
Solar contractors said rising electric rates have boosted business because it is easier to justify the initial expense of solar installations.
“The higher the rates go, the quicker they pay for themselves,” said Max Balchowsky, owner of Solar Electric Energy Systems in Palm Springs. For about the past eight weeks, he said, he has been getting six to eight calls a day from prospective customers. He said previously he got only about a half-dozen calls a month.
Eastvale residents Erik and Brandalyn Taylor say that until this summer, their electric bills were no more than $200 for their two-story, 2,400-square-foot house. But this month, their Edison bill was $602. With children ages 6, 3 and 1 - and, since last summer, a swimming pool - they’ve never come close to their maximum baseline energy allocation of 15.4 kilowatt hours a day. Their latest bill showed average daily consumption at 77.7 kilowatt hours, Taylor said.
The family signed up for an Edison program that shuts off their air conditioning at certain times, in exchange for a rebate.
“When they built the house, we had ceiling fans put in most of the rooms,” Taylor said. “Two years ago, we tinted (the windows) in the back of the house, which gets most of the sun.”
Next summer, they hope to have a patio cover built to keep the downstairs rooms cooler - and their bills lower. * * *
Staff writer David Olson contributed to this story. * * *
RESIDENTIAL ELECTRIC RATES
Southern California Edison rates are based on levels of usage in relation to a baseline rate per kilowatt hour.
Up to the baseline: 11.8 CENTS
1 to 30 percent over baseline: 13.7 CENTS
Rates on the upper tiers increase in November
31 to 100 percent over baseline: 22.3 CENTS TO 22.8 CENTS
101 percent to 200 percent more than baseline: 31.2 CENTS TO 35.5 CENTS
A fifth tier will be added:
For usage of 201 percent over baseline the rate will be: 48.2 CENTS
SOURCE: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON * * *
Sorry for the long post
OUTSTANDING post, Elo. Thanks!
I loved this bit:
Reno Fontana, 53, of Rancho Mirage, said Edison billed him $1,005 for June 15 to July 14. “I was stunned and in disbelief. I didn’t know it was possible to go to four digits. What are we to do?” he said.
Um…pay your bill?
Maybe no more dinners out and weekend trips to the beach? Priorities man, priorities.
Solar energy is going to become very big in California if that nonsense with the rates and rolling blackouts keeps up.
Solar Energy with today’s and the next 5 years of technology will only every be a minor player in CA’s grid power.
I know I used to sell Photovoltaic systems and I buy power for a large user.
There isn’t enough ore processing capacity in the world to expand PV manufacturing without first waiting 3-5 years for the next ore processing plant to come online.
I can think of a couple of serious business opportunities here.
A friend in Moreno Valley just got a bill for $691.
Leading Indicators point to possible recession:
http://www.chartoftheday.com/20060804.htm?T
Interesting HB stock action today. HOV was way down after hours on a serious earnings warning and then was up at the open today. I decided to buy more 30 strike puts at 10:00 am and the stock is already down $1.50 from the time that I purchased the puts. I also bought more WCI puts, as I expect that their earnings will be grim next week and will only get worse during the fall. I have a few Aug, many Sept and December WCI puts and a few of the March 07
I agree that index puts may be a good options, but I am still buying puts mostly on leveraged banks, lenders and especially builders. They have had a good bounce during the last two weeks, so a fed pause is should be priced in, especially if the fed still keeps open the option for raised in the fall, which they surely must unless a recession appears around the corner
Funny, I did the same thing: MTH, WCI, and HOV August puts after the morning pop. I kept raising my stops and got stopped out of MTH and WCI. WCI and LEND report the day after the FOMC, so I am considering buying puts Tuesday after the post-FOMC pop.
A little odd:
http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/nva/rfs/190002110.html
Assessed value is 760k.
those vespas are sweet looking scooters! i owned one or two many years ago.
NNMORTG;….Are you out there ?? I am in Reno for 5 days…I went South and looked @ some Lennar, K & B and some other smaller builders…I am going to look @ PULTE/Del Webb today….Any real soft housing tract’s you can recomend ??…I would like to drive through and take a look…Thanks…
Hey scdave! Check this out: http://www.sierradrifters.com/fish.html
Get out of Reno and go south!!!
Get out of Reno and go south!!!
FRED:…Your Killing Me !!!!!! I am stuck here bonding with the wife….Maybe in the fall….
PS: I did sign up for the email newsletter…Thanks….
Stucco, try this one. Heh heh heh
http://www.sfomag.com/homefeaturedetail.asp?ID=464411369&MonthNameID=August&YearID=2004
We hear from brokers, real estate agents, and appraisers — any underwriters out there willing to post about their experiences? They are the most crucial part of the approval process & yet they’re never heard from
Anybody from the Portland area on here? I’ve been hearing from a friend up there that new condo’s, etc. are going up like made, things are selling briskly, no slow down, etc. I think she was implying my bubble talk was hot air. I looked at the median price tracker and although Portand’s prices are steadily climbing upwards, so is their inventory. Anyone have first hand knowledge? Many thanks.
Chip, my folks are from SW of Portland (Lake Oswego/West Linn area). Prices in their neighborhood have doubled in the past three years—median is around 400k there, nearly twice what it was before the lending bubble. Homes in their neighborhood have sold briskly, even recently. However, there is indeed more inventory, and now much more price pressure. No ridiculous incentives like here in Phoenix, which is probably like FL and SAC, the epicenter of the coming crash.
There are several condo towers going up on the south waterfront and in the pearl district. I’ve been watching the south waterfront project. Only one of them is finished yet. It’s reportedly 90% sold. All the others will finish over the next 14 months or so, but I don’t have sales data for them.
FYI, I just moved back to Portland (OR) a few months ago from Southern Oregon. The CA bubble definitely made an impact in there, but the wave hit Portland late and with deminished ferocity. My preception is that things have finally started to crest in the last month or so. I doubt that we’ll have the CA magnitude blowout that I, and many here, expect here in Portland. That said, I’m still renting for the next year because the drop that does happen is still worth waiting for IMHO, particularly in the condo market.
I think Seattle and Portland are both at the top of their respective bubbles right now. Actually Seattle is probably a little ahead of Portland. Same Pacific Northwest west of the Cascade Mountains type location. We live 1 hour north of Seattle, and my husband is in construction and I can tell you that housing is still going strong around here.
I’m in the glitsy urban area of Portland called the Pearl, and have done a little work on that market. They basically missed the sales season. According to First American Title records there were only 12 closings in June, and 12 in July.
On May 5 there were only 51 listings on the market, today there are 101,
http://pearl-district-lofts.com/portland-oregon-pearl-district-homes.html?x=1&ob=pa&startrow=31
and about 66 new ones since June 16, it’s like a bell has gone off.
Although price reductions off of listed prices are now the norm, the prices are still shocking, and are typically still up 40-60% in just three years. For instance there is an new building called the Pinnacle, that opened last fall, and has been a flipper heaven, at least so far. I spotted one transaction, that closed in June for 834k. This seller would have locked in 2004 prices at 594k, and didn’t even have to close it until Nov. 2005 when the building opened. A 40% flip profit is amazing. There are
I think Pearl has a long way to fall, but what we are still seeing is this huge inventory buildup, and several more large buildings coming on line with the units offered at much higher prices than the Pinnacle (which will make successful flipping problematic), and the general buyer’s strike pattern witnessed everywhere else. Prices have weakened some, but are still sticky at ridiculous levels.
I’m in a southern suburb of Portland. I get an email when a house changes status (comes on the market, changes price, listing expires, etc.) and fits my criteria. Wow has it exploded in the past two weeks. Could be a statistical anomaly, but inventory is definitely rising. We’re about at 3 months of inventory according to my realtor and were at 2 months a month and a half ago. Things are still selling if the price is right. I would not call it slow, but I would say that things are slowing down. I’ve seen all the condos going up in Portland, but I don’t know any sales figures. My take is that prices are cresting and levelling off. I would not buy now.
My realtor is very successful and bullish (still) on real estate. I made a bet with him about 9 months ago that our region’s prices would go down by August ‘08. At the time of the bet his sentiment was “NO WAY!!! Real Estate only goes up! It’s different here”. Last week his sentiment was “I still like my odds on the bet, but it does seem to be slowing down”. That’s a huge change in sentiment for this person. If he can say that, I’m confidentt that things are slowing down.
Definitely slowing. Two realtor friends have been talking about how slow it has been lately. Inventory steadily rising every day. Prices have peaked though not falling much yet. Looking at SFRs, mostly close in eastside.
Via Fatwallet: Free $5,000 IKEA gift card with the purchase of a condo!
http://www.fatwallet.com/t/52/640251/
MOTIVATED SELLER IN CHICAGO!!!
http://www.ziprealty.com/buy_a_home/logged_in/search/my_home_detail.jsp?listing_num=06140838&property_type=CONDO&mls=mls_chicago&cKey=mw1z3472&source=MLSNI
34% price reduction after only 81 days on the market.
From Kauai:
Real estate market peaked, expert says
http://www.kauaiworld.com/articles/2006/08/04/news/news02.txt
Catch this stanford educated dumb ass describe the obligatory permanent plateau after the peak as a “tranquil phase”.
Economists suck.
i just received my SoCal Edison Electic Bill, Yikes !! i live in a one story home, 1400 sq ft. My bill during the summer is generally $60 max, average is around $40 for the hear. Last month’s bill was over $100. July’s bill was over $200 !!! WOW !
I’m glad i rent and can pay 50% less than what it would cost to mortgage this joint, i can’t imagine how tough it’s going to be for those in SoCal who are fighting to pay a fat mortage, then fill up the fat tank in their SUV, and pay to fill up their “fat” house with cool air.
Yikes
I agree. everythings supersized these days. I thought older boomers were supposed to downsize?
hear = year
People are going to crap their pants this week when they get their utility bills, i guarantee it !!!
Read about He bought this house in 07/30/2004: $798,000 - so he is losing everyday.
Fixer-Uppers Can Be Dreams or Money Pits:
http://biz.yahoo.com/weekend/fixup_1.html
As cynical as I’ve become, it takes a lot to make my jaw drop. Check out this post…. Wow. Just…. Wow….
http://www.foreclosureforum.com/mb/messages/18243.html
All there. Appraisal fraud, greedy flipper, clueless newbies, declining market. And the scary thing, is how much more of this is out there to be found???
(Forgot to mention the 100% financing. What scam could be complete without it?)
how stupid, well there goes the old people’s credit. I wonder if the investor was a silent owner of the house that was bought?
RE scam, I think there are going to be many more of these until this bubble fades away.
And realtor Ron actually took the 3-Day Ward’s course, so he’s an expert. Buy more courses, Ron. They are tax deductible. Assuming, of course, that you still have an income!
I actually know someone who did this (signed the loan docs for someone else due to real buyer’s bad credit). $800K house, 100% financing. My friend (the one with good credit) is retired and, IMHO, was taken advantage of, big time. Not particularly bright. I tried to warn her & she didn’t want to hear any of my “know it all” advice. $5,000/mo payments (not including taxes & ins.). No way she can come close to paying that in the event the buyer defaults. Ouch.
Housing Bust links.
#38 Of Bubbles Past: A Chronological Listing of News Headlines from the Last Housing Bubble in Southern California
Home Prices Do Fall - A Look At The Collapse Of The 1980s Real Estate Bubble(Northern New Jersey Real Estate Bubble)
Housing bubble correction could be severe
#35 ALL BOOMS BUST!
#9 Housing bubble’s burst could cost 1 million jobs and cause a recession, experts say
#16 Global credit ocean dries up
It’s RIP for the housing boom By Bill Fleckenstein
#31 I Want My Bubble Back!
Straight talk on what the Fed has wrought By Bill Fleckenstein
Bubbles caused by cheap cash menace world economy
Feds say that banks’ futures tied too closely to real estate
The economy’s next time down has begun Bill Fleckenstein
Lowering the Boom? Speculators Gone Mild
#21 As real estate market cools, ‘buys’ return
Mortgage lenders grapple with deflating housing bubble
For-sale signs multiply across U.S.
White House sees housing cooling gradually
Painful ARM twisting
New issue for homeowners: Inflated appraisals
#40 Condo Prices See Significant Drop(San Diego)
#37 The boomer bust
I posted this to yesterday’s CL thread by accident:
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/rfs/190209805.html
Trust me, its worth looking at. Sheer insanity!
is this leslie appleton-youngs assistant selling this?
You are going to have to drop that price by at least $100 if you hope to find a willing buyer…
Is the bicycle included?
That is sick, truly sick. I can’t even believe it. 260 k for? Geesh!!!!
After the crash, when the collective snake-oil hucksters of the NAR, appraisal industry, Freddy Mac/Freddy Mae, and mortage brokers have been sent packing, perhaps new, untainted, honorable institutions with reputable leaders will arise in their place. And, no doubt, we’ll see a flood of reforms and new laws (with actual enforcement) to curb the excesses that helped cause this bubble. The “voices in the wilderness” who foretold this disaster, and acted with integrity and foresight, will exert considerable influence in the New Era as sanity imposes itself.
As the FBs and disgraced NAR officials huddle around their hobo-camp trash can fires, roasting rat kabob and sharing tales of woe while passing the paper bag that holds the Ripple, thousands of new, fiscally-responsible homebuyers, who in the dark days of 2005-2006 had their Road to Damascus awakening after happening upon this site, will give silent thanks to Ben Jones.
And somewhere, amidst the blackened skeltons of unfinished condos and “luxury” condos converted to moderately-priced apartments, Suzanne will be leaning wearily on her corner lampost, adjusting her fishnet stockings as she plies her new trade, though she still seals the deal with a Hummer in the driveway.
ah, Sammy…that was rich!
Mogambo Guru has written an excellent recent analysis of Bernanke’s principal challenge (the need to fool everyone into believing he is fighting inflation so that he can stave off deflationary pressures…):
“Now we see the Bank of Bernanke’s strategy more clearly: it must crush inflationary expectations, while preparing to fight deflation as soon as it appears. When U.S. asset prices crack - that is, when stocks, bonds, and real estate begin to collapse - you will see another rush to cut rates.
It worked so well last time, from 2001-2004, it surprised us. Too bad it’s not the sort of trick you can pull over and over.”
And I agree — these fooling games the Fed is playing become increasingly predictable over time. Just ask any hedge fund manager. The problem is that with such predictability, it is no longer sound economic fundamentals that drive investment decisions, but rather gambling strategy based on anticipation of the Fed’s next market manipulation. Meanwhile, massive misallocation of capital proceeds unchecked in the real economy, as the effect of repeated and predictable bailouts is to undermine the price signal that provides indication of whether investments are worth the risk of undertaking them. If BB succeeds in propping up “the corpse” of a housing market as the Guru suggests he intends to, then we can expect the imbalances in the US economy to continue to grow, with a still uglier day of reckoning in store when the heir of Volcker eventually takes charge.
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/Issues/2006/DRUS071006.html
Why Mogambu thinks the Fed’s secret plan is to keep housing price inflation percolating, to whatever extent possible. Again, the strategy depends on fooling a critical mass of sheep. I hope Robert Lucas and Milton Friedman are not paying attention…
——————————————————————————————–
Both Bernanke and Greenspan recognized the deflation enemy, and raised rates - not to fight inflation (although that is what they appeared to be doing), but to “reload the gun.” They had to hike rates in order to be able to cut them to fight deflation. Now, with 525 basis points from here to zero, at least the Fed has a new round of ammunition.
But what will get them to pull the trigger? The most likely signal of deflation is a slowdown in consumer spending. Since consumer incomes are either flat or falling, consumer spending depends on the real estate market continuing fat and flourishing. And for that, the housing market must be propped up like a corpse at a viewing. The Fed must try to keep house prices from collapsing - at any cost! But, the housing market depends on long rates, not short rates. Mortgages are long-term debt. And long-term lending rates depend largely on lenders’ views on inflation. If they think they have a real inflation fighter at the Fed, they are most likely to lend at low rates. If, on the other hand, they see the Fed’s knees weakening, or its hands toiling over a white flag, they’re likely to want higher rates.
“But, the housing market depends on long rates, not short rates. Mortgages are long-term debt.”
You know, I used to think that…however, aren’t some of the big coastal areas’ prices dependent on an ever growing number of “exotic” loan products (Option-ARM, interest only, very low teaser rates)…and aren’t those exotics tied to short term rates? In other words, can’t Ben B. re-spike the punch bowl (with 151 even) by lowering short term rates, lowering rates for Option-ARMs and I/O ARMs?
That’s certainly my take on it, arroyo. I’d hate to see BB drop rates. Make preparations to exit the dollar, IMHO, if this should happen.
Update from Europe:
I posted a comment about 2 weeks ago highlighting several recent mainstream print articles in the UK that touted that real estate prices were going to continue to climb towards the sky for the next 10 years. Same old logic: “immigration”, “they aren’t making more land”, ad naseum.
Today, to my shock and horror, I see the headlines have changed.
___________________________________________________________
Britons are mortgaged to the hilt
By BECKY BARROW, Daily Mail 21:41pm 4th August 2006
Spiralling levels of debt threaten to ruin tens of thousands of families, shocking figures have revealed.
Repossessions, mortgage arrears and bankruptcies have all rocketed over the last year.
The number who risk losing their home has returned to levels not seen since the dark days of the early 1990s.
…
but may june prices were up in UK- go figure
You guys can take your shorts on the market through commodities. Problem is the timing has to be exactly right or say goodbye to all your play money. Can’t you see the system is set up so “little” guys like us get burned? I watched my dad in the 60s, 70s, and 80s burn up his money. Slow down and make money through wisdom.
“Can’t you see the system is set up so “little” guys like us get burned?”
This is what HedgeFundAnalyst told us — “the house always wins.” We have not heard from him lately; I wonder if he still thinks he is part of the house these days? (I will assume that he is so busy making money hand-over-foot that he has no more time to share his insights here…)
So true. Hard to discern between people speculating on housing and people speculating on the crash. Two sides of the same animal.
Great post!
The only people speculating on the bursting of the housing bubble are the following:
People who sold their primary residence to bubble sit.
People who short housing related stocks.
Other people who are not speculating but eagerly awaiting bubble rubble are:
People who were born too late.
People who elected to attend college rather than buy earlier.
People who sold to support a career and chose not to buy back in.
etc.
was HedgeFundAnalyst saying he was making money off the bubble?
He was saying “The House” (meaning deep-pocketed Wall Street firms, like the one for which he presumably works) always wins…
Do you ever wonder who is dumb enough to pay big bucks for a refrigerator with a flat panel TV in it?
http://phoenix.craigslist.org/apa/183153125.html
Who owns this place, Derek Zoolander?
It does not exactly help the landlord’s bargaining position when he openly shows his desperation:
“Please be ready to lease immediately… Needs to be leased ASAP…”
I LOVE the “concrete counter tops”. Damn, didn’t know granite was so yesterday.
What a fool this be. $5500/mo in Phx. For that, I can just about stay in a villa at the Biltmore.
My thoughts as well. $5,500 monthly will get a pretty nice house pluce acreage, although there may be soime incredible advantage to downtown Pheonix I am not thinking of (WTF?).
OT, but a great read on energy which of course effects housing. Warning, kinda long.
http://www.energybulletin.net/18904.html
Had to post this: http://stlouis.craigslist.org/rfs/190369506.html
Who could resist a free ‘93 “camero”?
Looks like St. Louis might be in on the game (hopefully, I’d like to buy sometime in the near future). Granted 140k is chump change compared to what some of you guys are facing but the appreciation the past few years has still been out of control.
How a raccoon caused me to become a homeless bum…
1) David Liarreah and Leslie Appleton Young are driving along a road at night
2) They are speeding to get to the next rah rah session to stem the tide in CA
3) As they round a bend in the road there in the middle of the road is a raccoon
4) LAY is driving and swerves to avoid the animal
5) They both die as the car runs into the granite countertop of a new McMansion
6) NAR loses its two biggest mouth pieces and nobody is there to spin the bubble burst
7) Without all the rah rah the news becomes more bearish on RE
House prices fall and people just walk away from their homes
9) Consumers stop spending
10) Layoffs
11) The stock market crashes and my 401K is just a fraction of what it was
12) FED starts stoking M3 and dollars become worthless
13) Foreign investors panic and pull out of U.S.
14) Banks start going bellyup
15) The bank where I have my 200K from the sale of my house goes bellyup
16) I am left with only 100k (insured by government) after the bank collapses
17) Government defaults on insuring money in collapsed banks (I lose my remaining 100K)
18) My company goes out of business
19) Company pension fund was maxed out in RE holdings and is gone
20) The government to up the “War on Terror” and cuts back SS payments
21) I get a small monthly SS check and a bit from the ruins of my 401K
22) But by now we have Argentina style hyperinflation and my dollars are used to stoke the fire in the refugee camp where I now live
23) My friend who bought gold coins to barter with is followed home and killed for his gold coins
24) Microsoft announces Vista service pack update 12….but by now nobody cares
25) Hillary Clinton wins the electon (5% turnout) and promises a “piece of bread and a cup of soup for all”
And all because of a dirty old raccoon……
…and then there’s the pessimistic version…
The sweetest thing about this housing bubble crash is that after a lifetime of cushiness, the baby boomers are finally going to get their comeuppance. Hey boomers — you thought just b/c you were a homeowner you were going to have retirement handed to you on a silver platter, but you were WRONG. this whole housing bubble was just another way for the boomers to suck the life out of younger people. not that younger people weren’t gullible enough to fall for it — most of them were — .
in some ways I really want to be a homeowner, but with the rising property taxes, mediocre to lousy schools, and poisonous atmosphere of so many suburbs, i’m wondering if i’ll ever get the gumption to actually close on a home.
I’m a boomer, rented for 10 years after losing in the previous RE bubble and my assets are well diversified to last me through the economic collapse we’ll see in a few years. I’ll be able to live without a job for 8 years if I lose my job Monday morning - and that’s with my own savings. My fellow boomers won’t be able to count on me either to pay for their retirement. Of those who have 401ks and IRAs, the average amount in them is a modest $50,000. A boomer with $50,000 in retirement and an overinflated house will have to eat dogfood, I’m ‘fraid.
mmmm….Alpo
“The sweetest thing about this housing bubble crash is that after a lifetime of cushiness, the baby boomers are finally going to get their comeuppance.”
Well Kathleen, I’m a babyboomer who will be debt free in 5 short years. My husband makes under 6 figures, I stay at home with 2 youngins (I supported him while he was getting his 2nd degree) We only bought in 6 short years ago. You speak of boomers whining but you seem to have learned well. We got to this point making decisions that weren’t easy. We left friends and what we knew behind to move to a place that made more fiscal sense to us. I hated it here as it’s culturally very different from what we left behind. We probably saved our future. If you haven’t been able to see what you needed to do or decided you couldn’t make those same choices….that’s your fault, not ours. Be responsible for what you have done to get yourself there. That’s the path out!
When I pay off that mortgage before I’m 50 I’ll think about you dear…..with your cell phones, i-pod, and $100 cable and what are you driving? I’m sure there are reasons you feel trapped but those problems are yours. Awww! That feels better.
upstater, you won’t be thinking about “me, dear”. the whole point of my post was that other people in my generation are trapped, but not me, mostly b/c i haven’t bought a house yet (instead i have savings). there is no reason to take anything on this blog personally. btw, sorry you’re in debt.
And old too! lol
Baby boomers w/ debt = problems.
Brad Delong:
Either households will continue spending beyond all reason, or businesses will start boosting investment, or exports will start booming, or there will be a recession sometime in the next year. Figure the odds at 3 out of 10.
Thanks for this post.
Brad Delong is a Berkeley macro professor who was Deputy Undersecretary to the Treasury under Lawrence Summers (Clinton’s cabinet), with former graduate student advisees at high places in DC. His take on the risks facing the economy should be taken seriously, as he is a superb policy analyst with close ties to Washington insiders. I especially admire the fact that he has seen the same light that many regulars here have seen, and does not mince words about the situation we face:
——————————————————————————————–
Never say that a recession is coming. Say only that a recession is here, or that there might be a recession on the way. Which, in fact, is what I’m saying today. As of the beginning of August 2006, a recession is not here, and I’m not going to violate my own rule by saying one is coming. But there is a good chance — for the first time since 2003 — that there might be a recession in progress six months from now.
Why? Three factors: 1) A Federal Reserve that finds itself with less inflation-fighting credibility than it thought it had; 2) upward pressure on inflation from rising energy and, perhaps, import prices; and 3) millions of middle-class homeowners who for too long have treated their houses as gigantic ATMs, using home equity loans and refinancing to generate extra spending money.
Never say that a recession is coming. Say only that a recession is here, or that there might be a recession on the way.
On the way = Is coming. Doublespeak clouded by semantics. Otherwise, good article.
So how does that make him different from David or Leslie???
“On the way = Is coming”
You left out the two most important words: “might be”.
Brad Delong understands that the timing of recessions are unpredictable, and that was his point.
See above - I didn’t - “)
I think the difference between saying “a recession is coming” and “there might be a recession on the way” is the word “might”.
Why do economists (including Delong) blog?
http://economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=7258939
if our landlord says we have to move ASAP because the house is being reposessed, what are our rights? In terms of how long we can stay and try and find another place? Sometimes renting is not always best…
It depends a bit on the state where you’re living, but for most states their law says that in the moment the house is repossesed (foreclosed), your lease is ended. Before that moment, your lease is valid and you don’t have to move, and afterwards the old landlord is irrelevant, so don’t care what he or her says you should do. Instead, contact the mortgage holder now and see if you can negotiate an extension of the lease. They might be interested in getting that extra money, but THEY might want you out ASAP.
pay rent to escrow- he’s going to break his contract so your’s become optional
“But, the housing market depends on long rates, not short rates. Mortgages are long-term debt.”
You know, I used to think that…however, aren’t some of the big coastal areas’ prices dependent on an ever growing number of “exotic” loan products (Option-ARM, interest only, very low teaser rates)…and aren’t those exotics tied to short term rates? In other words, can’t Ben B. re-spike the punch bowl (with 151 even) by lowering short-term rates, lowering rates for Option-ARMs and I/O ARMs?
(Sorry for the double post, but I am truly interested in what effect a drop in short term rates could have to help those that use “extreme financing” to buy a house…and possibly prolong the bubble).
You have a point; that is, teaser ARM rates are much more tightly linked to the Fed Funds rate than, say, thirty-year fixed mortgage rates. But IMO the Fed board does not see it in their interest to encourage another group of greater fools to buy homes they cannot afford using ARMs, which are supposedly only appropriate for wealthy buyers who need the flexibility to vary their loan repayment stream, as doing so only increases systemic risk for a bad consumption-driven recession up the road. And besides, the Fed has bigger worries — like the risk that foreign credit might dry up and the dollar might tank if their resolve to fight inflation is not credible.
Great point seldom discussed. The FED can immediately affect ARMs but not much effect on the traditonal and seldom-used-lately - 30-year fixed.
traditonal=traditional. My bad!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_property_bubble
I was at a party yesterday where the conversation turned, naturally, to real estate. But the discussion was about additions (as everyone there - except me - was a homeowner). A couple who just moved into the neighborhood 6 months ago (read: bought at the peak - I kept my mouth shut on that) was comparing their home to another’s. New couple was lamenting that they don’t have the nice additions that old couple does and said they were going to take out a home loan to do so. Another couple (who moved in just a couple of years ago) also chimed in that they want to build on to be like everyone else. Note this couple’s home already has a 3-season room addition. They are also so far in debt, it’s frightening (would keep me awake every night if I were in their situation).
I was just shocked to hear it all. I said, “Is it just impossible for anyone to be satisfied with what they have in the present? I’d give my right arm to live in one of these homes - without any addition.” I was then raked over the coals about how these people have high expectations and lofty goals and how that’s a GOOD thing and to think otherwise would be settling. It made me want to vomit.
The only couple who I felt were worthy of feeling this way was old couple. They’ve lived there 10 years and every time they want something (an addition, a deck, a remodeled kitchen), they SAVE UP FIRST and then proceed. That’s totally cool with me. But to go further and further into debt to make your master bedroom bigger is just stupid IMO. Cripes all you do is sleep and have sex there.
Man I hope that 1997 values x 1.20 formula mentioned this weekend comes true. Guess what? I would actually be able to live in that neighborhood were that to be the case. And then I could start saving up for my peer-pressure addition.
I have nothing against folks who add on to their homes in order to better accomodate their life style preferences, PROVIDED that the home improvements are within their financial means, without the implicit assumption that a high rate of future home price inflation to pay off the note. But I am afraid that the taxpayers will ultimately get to pay for lots of these additions in the form of some kind of govt bailout for those who could not really afford them and end up going BK…
“will enable them to pay off the note.”
“Is it just impossible for anyone to be satisfied with what they have in the present? ”
——————————————————–
No. They are entitled to have everything their heart desires because they made the smart decision to buy a home. HELOC it up the ying-yang and let appreciation pay it off. Take a ride on the money train.
Property here in Salinas is not going to change quickly overnight in spite of the increased listings, why? Because housing with 5 bedrooms is pending sales because multifamilies are being allowed to buy into the properties as ‘affordable housing’….you just put one family in and then the rest move in to make the payments. SFH neighborhoods look like apartment complexes. City doesn’t mind, they retain their tax base and when one family moves out another will move in.
yuck, where you going to park your car? I bet they raise sewer rates though.
Sounds like Salinas is well on its way to becoming a POS.
Here is one for the “bucket”
The Best of Lowball!
The focus is on the Northern NJ market, but interesting to take a look at even if you aren’t from the area.
grim
How are some of these possible? I’m browsing the “under $250K” because, well, that’s my market. How does a property list for $325,000 and sell for $105,000? Or even $389K to $185K?! I have lowball envy for sure.
This is funny. Check out the profession of this “employer”
http://fortlauderdale.craigslist.org/adg/186361323.html
If they add an H1 or H2 to the types of cars offered, they can advertise:
Give a hummer, get a Hummer.
Sorry, I just *had* to say that.
That has got to be a cop posting to bust prostitutes.
That is truly ubelievable.
Anyone with a subscription to those magazines to check out who the entrepeneur of the year was, let’s out ‘em.
I have never understood guys that patronize whores.
As someone has occasionally pointed out here, the govt’s modus operandi these days seems to be, “Privatize profits, socialize risk.” A new FHA bill designed to increase the number of 100% financed buyers and increase FHA exposure to unaffordably-priced markets, seems to fit that description. Party on, dudes!
————————————————————————————————–
NATION’S HOUSING KENNETH HARNEY
House approves bill giving FHA new lease on life
August 6, 2006
WASHINGTON – Moderate-income home buyers got a big boost from Congress at the end of July, when the House voted 415-7 to approve a bill revitalizing the federal government’s biggest mortgage program – the Federal Housing Administration (FHA).
The bill, which now awaits Senate action, would allow the FHA to offer zero-down-payment loans for the first time, increase permissible mortgage amounts substantially in high-cost markets, and provide low-interest rates and consumer protections that are rarely available from “subprime” mortgage lenders.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20060806/news_1h06harney.html
SD condo for sale in UTC. Only asking $55K below what they paid in 2004 for all 966 sq ft of it.
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/rfs/190756443.html
Purchased in July 2004 for $450K and now asking $395K with all the noise from I-5 you can stand to be thrown in for free. Newly built in 1986. Get yours now.
“Beatuiful Carmel Valley Home Vacant!!”
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/rfs/190756680.html
At least this seller is getting more realistic about getting out. He’s had to reduce his asking to $2K above what he paid for it in September 2005 according to the County Assessor’s office. This was a month ago on 7/5. Hurry, the realtor says it won’t last. Is it that the construction is that shoddy or maybe that price won’t be the last? I’m not sure what ‘beatuiful’ is all about, but I’m guessing the owner is taking a beating on this one.
Another Craigslist “SHORT SALE, NEED OFFER NOW!!!”
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/rfs/190749868.html
This little flipper flopped. Purchased in March of ‘05 for $530K and redecorated, but no takers it seems for this 1032 sq ft slice of paradise at $499K. They’re now asking $30K below what they paid for this albatross of a box.
Thanks for those examples of FBs, SD suntaxed! Keep up the good work!
The House passed a bill called “Expanding American Home-ownership Act of 2006″ (HR 5121).
It seeks to expand the upper limit on FHA loans and give 100% loans to people who can’t now afford because of rising home prices.
In just the past couple of months, we’ve heard NAR/Lereah pleading with Bernanke to keep interest rates low because they are affecting “price sensitive markets” (ie. home prices are coming down).
Then a couple weeks ago we heard legislators pleading with Bernake to “keep his eye on the housing market”. Which to me indicates that Legislators also are aware that the price of homes is coming down.
Therefore, call me cynical, but the timing of this Bill is very suspect.
It appears that the Gov. is in collusion to float the housing market by putting more and more people into homes they cannot afford without nutty loans.
The Bill goes before the Senate next.
I’ve tried to locate where to make comments on the US. gov site but haven’t figured out how to do it.
Petition anyone?
“Therefore, call me cynical, but the timing of this Bill is very suspect.”
Call me cynical too, please…
Vote was 415-7 in the House. Whom are you planning on convincing in the Senate? I’m beyond cynical - I’m swimming in a sea of joy.