August 9, 2006

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For August 9, 2006

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here!




RSS feed | Trackback URI

156 Comments »

Comment by jmf
2006-08-09 04:14:39

hello from germany

tol and wci are out with numbers
highlight : wci towerorders down 89%!
operating cashflow minus 341m$ compared to 178m$ in 05
if i have read ist right.

my summary
http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/2006/08/toll-brothers-tol.html
http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/2006/08/wci-builder-von-condos-in-florida.html

Comment by Bill
2006-08-09 06:13:20

WCI is one of my biggest positions, with about 200 puts of the mostly Sept and Dec 22.5, 20 and 17.5 stike options. These were bought at the money. From yesterday morning through 10:00 am this morning those positions are up $30K.

The Sept HOV 30 puts that I bought on Fridays bounce, just by luck when the stock peaked are now up 170%.

I wish that my positions in Accedited (LEND) were bigger. The Sept 50 puts were up 60% and the Sept 45 put were up over 100% just today. Lend gapped down this morning on the opening. I have not read their earnings report yet.

I hope that txchick got out of her housing long positions.

Right now the implied volatility is almost 100% on WCI, almost unheard of for a builder. I will probably buy more Dec 17.5 and Mar 07 $15 WCI put positions when things settle down. WCI is over 70% Florida construction. With the increase in homeowners insurance in Florida in the last few weeks, the housing decline there may accellerate into the fall, even if they are not hit by hurricanes. Cramer again pronounced WCI a buy yesterday, because of the Fed pause. Anyone following his advice is getting killed.

Comment by txchick57
2006-08-09 06:23:31

Stopped out by trailing stops, yes. Hardly worth the effort.

If you’re going to claim perfect timing and outsized profits (170%) in a short period in this sector, please advise of your position when you enter it, not four days after the fact. It makes it just a tad hard to believe, if you know what I mean.

Comment by tj & the bear
2006-08-09 06:58:08

txchick57,

No wonder you’re successful with that competitive attitude! ;-)

Give Bill a little credit. He did say “just by luck”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Bill
2006-08-09 07:26:21

I couldn’t really predict that HOV would do so well. I just didn’t believe it when the stock was down $2 after hours on terrible earnings and then gapped up $1 by 10:00 am on Friday. It was just lucky. I bought 10 Sep 30 puts with the stock at about $30.5 and also 5 Jan 30 puts on the same stock. The Sept position was already up 50% by close on Friday. This is one time when an emotional reaction seems to have lead to a good buy.

I have about 100 option put positions in three accounts, almost all under the theme of the housing bubble, so I would not want to announce all of them. Sometimes one should get lucky with the wind at one’s back. The CTX, KBH, HOV, WCI, Lend, CFC, CORS, SPF and BBX that I bought during the last two weeks of July were mostly red until today, but a few days of 20% gains (and in the case of LEND, 60 to 100% in one day) have helped a lot.

Most of my positions are conservative in the money, 3 to 8 month positions, based on the premise that housing is going to get worse than most of Wall Street expects.

I am trying to learn to take some profits after a big bounce and to better time my buying. However, putting money into housing put positions since March has been a good play. I lost 30k on options, some in housing, during 2005, but am doing very well this year.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by david cee
2006-08-09 07:52:01

Pulte is the #1 market cap homebuilders. The $25 Put options for Jan 2008 is the one I consider a major money maker. It will give PHM a whole winter non selling season to report lower and lower earnings, and when the goof balls on CNBC pull the plug on buying homebuilders, and when all the overpriced listings finally wake up and lower their prices, and if Pulte files BK to reorganize, I expect a major crash of this option

 
 
 
Comment by Fred Hooper
2006-08-09 08:20:50

Great stuff for RE/HB shorts ammo:
http://www.contraryinvestor.com/mo.htm

Comment by Bill
2006-08-09 09:46:36

Nice posting. This kind of data should give the housing optimsists some worry. I guess that alot of analysts just look at P/E, PEG, projected earnings etc., and don’t seem to worry about all of the earnings warnings that are being posted by the RE-related companies. I agree that the lenders are probably good downside candidates, because they are not down that much from peaks. But there is still plenty of downside for the home builders.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by jmf
2006-08-09 11:02:17

hello from germany

the wci call was one of the worst i have ever hear. 110 minutes and the quote of the day. “the management is realistic”
yeah right……..
they are betting to 100% on q1 in 2007. they will close 4 towers with hundredts of units. the closing should happen in 2 days!!!!! the question from an analsyt if this is realistic in these times. answer: we have done it this way for the last 10 years. it always worked!!!!!!!!!!!!!! realistic…………..

there were 6 defaluts in the last quarter. 5 in june!. this were the first defaults this year! they bet that the default rate for the year will not rise.(realistic)

cashflow for the year negative. debt to caitalratio 60% instedt of 50%.

540 land bank, 42,5 mio landoptions. no writedown necessary.
because our labd is different….. maybe very view of the options (realistic)

etc. unbelievable. you must here the whole call. i recommend it.

my bet is in q1 07 there will be a massiv warning that will violate the terms of the creditline in 2007.

http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/

 
 
Comment by Suspicious 2
2006-08-09 20:02:26

Congratulations on the Newsweek Businees Interview Ben. We always knew you’d amount to something!

Does this make you a profit now?

I’ve also learned alot from this blog and have enjoyed it for almost two years now.

Keep up the good work.

 
 
Comment by jmf
2006-08-09 04:17:23

2nd try from germany,

tol an wci are out with numbers.

gighlight from wci: towerorders down 89%!
operating cashflow minus 341m$ compared to 178m$ in 05 (if i read it right)

my summary
http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/2006/08/wci-builder-von-condos-in-florida.html
http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/2006/08/toll-brothers-tol.html

Comment by jmf
2006-08-09 04:33:40

correction
cashflow in 05 minus 178m$

 
 
Comment by simmssays
2006-08-09 04:28:22

Luxury home builder Toll Brothers Inc. on Wednesday said new orders and revenue fell in the quarter just ended, prompting the company to further reduce the number of homes it expects to build this year, as the U.S. housing market continued its slide. …per reuters.

Simmssays…Row, Row, Row Your Bicycle
http://www.americaninventorspot.com/row_your_bike

Comment by Arwen U.
2006-08-09 05:25:57

Interesting . . .

“Toll said the company is holding the line on discounting homes and has instead chosen to allow its sales pace to slow.”

Comment by rms
2006-08-09 05:46:24

“Toll said the company is holding the line on discounting homes and has instead chosen to allow its sales pace to slow.”

That strategy is intended to hold off the anticipated lawsuits when the builder begins dropping the price on their new units forcing the recent FBs into an “upside down” position.

Comment by scdave
2006-08-09 06:11:21

And, did I hear the quote correctly that the CEO said this was “The most difficult inviorment he has seen in his career” ???

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2006-08-09 04:45:13

last housing slowdown started in 1986 ? w oil patch- that took 20% out of play before 1989
this time is different, all going neg with 6-9 months

 
Comment by waaahoo
2006-08-09 04:54:47

Hmmm. First time in years - and it happened twice this week - that I had a painter drop of a flyer looking for work.

Comment by OlBubba
2006-08-09 05:08:20

Where are you located, waaahoo?

Comments like yours are good, but they’re even better when they have a geographic bearing. :)

Comment by waaahoo
2006-08-09 06:03:53

New Jersey. Vacation area for Philly / NY

Comment by House Inspector Clouseau
2006-08-09 06:19:38

We’re getting our bathroom redone. tilers are coming today. We asked for a bid, we were going to do it leisurely. We asked for 3 bids. The various bidders called us 4-5 times a week for 3 weeks saying “do you want to tile yet? are you sure you don’t want to tile yet?”.

It was sad. But last year this time you couldn’t get a tiler during the summer even if you gave them a blowjob.

Location: Mpls

FWIW: minor remodel… doing a lot ourselves… total cost is gonna be under $5k… Based on those remodelling/flipping shows I’ve been watching, my house should increase $400,000 in value. :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by waaahoo
2006-08-09 06:53:52

Clouseau,

And now the clock starts ticking on all the debt these contractors have accumulated.

I’ve been holding off getting drywall / insulation bids for a little job I’m doing just to allow a little more reality to set in.

 
Comment by 2000 Man
2006-08-09 07:02:45

Sacramento. Needed a new concrete patio poured this spring and contacted five contractors. Of the five, only three showed up and only one actually gave me a bid. He got the job.

(OT: Why would you drive to a site, assess the work, and then never deliver a bid?)

A few weeks ago one of the “no-shows” contacted me asking if the work was still available. Also got a call from the guy who did the job asking if I had other work or knew people who did. Very sad!

 
Comment by peter m
2006-08-09 18:55:28

My Mom’s house was retiled, Bathroom floors and bathtub walls, and kitchen floor. Ceramic 12 x 12 ” tiles used throughout. The Contractors were recommended by my brother-in-law: The Contractor turned out to be a quasi-legal Hispanic immigrant contractor. The cost of the job came out to just under $4000.00, including cost of the tiles.
I was on-site watching their work about 20% of the work time, and believe me if i did not give them specific instructions and directions they would have skipped over a lot of the necessary preliminary prep-work(removing and scraping off old tile,ect).
I am normally opposed to hiring semi-legal immigrant contractors but as they were recommended my my in-laws and my Mom was determined to pay all cash( I contributed 1/3 of the cost), I went along with using these immigrant contractors, which i am sure the vast majority of all Scal flippers/home remodelers are doing.
To save on costs i did a lot of the follow-up,pre-post finish work myself( mouldings, trim, installing new bathtub fixtures and handicap bathtub grip, sealants,ect.

 
 
Comment by MazNJ
2006-08-09 06:27:04

Let me add another thing in for the Jersey shore:

Have an associate who is a small business owner in her 50s, divorced. Has liens in excess of several hundred thousand against the house due to shennanigans of husband during divorce. House has steadily deteriorated since the divorce as she can’t afford the upkeep on it (it has some ungodly # of bedrooms - 10 if I remember correctly - this thing is titanic).

Well, mind you its AUGUST… I’ve been telling her for years to try and unload that elephant before it rotted further and further. She thinks she can somehow find a summer renter (hahahaha) or at least someone to rent it out to. Mind you that would force her and her children out (they’d have to rent a house). Additionally, she’d have to force out all the other tenants of the house. She’s been basically running it as a boarding house to make the mortgage payments, renting out the rooms (the policy came once and cleared it out due to violating the laws of the town - the town is somewhat tony and the neighbors consider it a steadily growing eyesore - the people living there for the most part aren’t that bad to my knowledge)…

Well to tie it all in, a contractor that I know - in the recent boom, bought himself a few new cars, a parcel of land and was planning on building himself a house, etc on it. (Please add in Irony that his 15 year old son warned him that maybe trying to build this house and buying the fancy cars was maybe not a good idea as this seemed to be an unusually well time and it might continue - this kid now has a soft spot in my heart). Well, I guess most of that’s abandoned and he’s now renting a room from her.

What does this tell us? Hell, I have no idea actually, but I see so many undertones related to the housing bubble in this I had to share it. Giant Mansions becoming boarding homes for out of work contractors (and maybe real estate agents)? Greedy (yes, she’s a lovely woman but she could have ended this easily the past two years by just SELLING the place - it would have, up until now, easily covered the outstanding liens and mortgages) owners riding their real estate into bankruptcy? Ahh well.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by waaahoo
2006-08-09 06:46:11

That’s what I see in the future for most of these mansions along the shore. Like the big old victorians before them, when they becme impossible to keep up alone they will be divided up into rooming houses / apartments.

 
Comment by CA renter
2006-08-09 08:53:42

A construction friend of ours had to cancel some recreational trips with my husband. Said, “nobody’s buying houses,” and he couldn’t afford it. Very depressed. Was about to sell some vehicles before a last-minute job safed the day (for now).

There’s a lot of potential hurt coming right around the corner. As we’ve mentioned many times before, people do not have a buffer against hard times (it’s been their houses and credit cards, and those are being tapped out).

 
Comment by waaahoo
2006-08-09 09:05:35

Yes CA and Clouseau, the clock has started ticking on all the debt that these builders have accumulated.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by jmf
2006-08-09 05:06:14

hello from germany

fnm delays again! look at this statement at the filing

we have determined that our previouly filed audited and interim financial statements for the periods from jan. 2001 trough the 2nd quarter of 2004should no longer be relied on because those financial statements were prepared applying accounting practices that did not comply with GAAP.

we are conducting a restatement of our historical financial statements for the year end december 31, 2003 and 2002.

i´ve picked this from a lot of others
http://www.fanniemae.com/media/pdf/newsreleases/12b25august2006.pdf (PDF!!!!!!!!)

http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/

 
Comment by flatffplan
2006-08-09 05:10:53

soon all but fed gov workers may be looking for owrk- everyone takes a hit

Comment by Mark
2006-08-09 05:35:40

Katrina will be nationwide.

 
Comment by tj & the bear
2006-08-09 06:04:59

flat,

Got any new tunes??? You’ve played that one to death.

FYI, the guys at DailyReckoning have calculated that pretty much half (yes, 50%) of the U.S. gets their checks directly or indirectly from government. Military, civil/public service, contractors, granted researchers, pensioners, subsidized farmers, social security & welfare recipients, etc. Scary, eh?

Comment by Bill In Phoenix
2006-08-09 10:39:12

tj & the bear,

statistically, one out of every 2 posters on this blog get some form of government check. Not all government checks are bad. I’m a defense contractor so I’m one of those receivers (indirectly) of government checks. If these wonderful gadgets such as heat seeking missiles, SDI rockets, fighter jets were provided by the US post office, (i.e. only federal workers), do you think they would be developed by now for the same quality at a lower price? Also, our constitution says one of the 3 functions of government is to provide for the common defense. That takes taxpayer money of some form. In the old old days, it was through tariffs. Since 1913, it was through the federal income tax. Also the Constitution says the government must provide a system of justice. So are public prosecutors and public defenders bad guys too? I think not. We are US citizens. We bought into this U.S. Constitution.

Comment by tj & the bear
2006-08-09 12:58:23

Hey, Bill, I have no problem with the constitutional requirements — I’m all for defense & justice. It’s all the BS that’s been added since that irks me. [I'm actually a bit of a military buff -- Clancy's my favorite author.]

My primary point was that government’s way too big and has a hand in way too many’s livelihood. That’s scary.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Polestar
2006-08-09 05:36:17

Heard an ad on the radio for VW cars. First there was the ‘used’ car, then it was ‘pre-owned’… now it is ‘pre-loved’ cars.

That is desperation, a stupid marketing idea, or both. Wait until that trickles up to the ‘pre-loved’ home.

Comment by nnvmtgbrkr
2006-08-09 05:56:50

Uh-oh…..car salesmen must have got their hands on the realtor handbook. I can’t wait to here a car described as a “creampuff”.

Comment by tj & the bear
2006-08-09 06:11:54

You know what surprises me? That the builders didn’t take a page from the car salesman’s handbook and simply advertise homes by the payment.

Comment by House Inspector Clouseau
2006-08-09 06:22:03

Are you kidding? they do.

At least here, I see it all the time. Big billboards say:

“Why rent when you can buy for so much less!”
Then it will have a breakdown:
3BR 2Ba home, rent $1500/mo, can buy for $750/mo!

(then in miniscule writing: using option arm)

clouseau

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by robert
2006-08-09 06:43:28

And with some of those ARMs, you’ll own more of the house if you RENT IT! (Becuase you’re equity will be ZERO instead of NEGATIVE)

 
 
Comment by sw
2006-08-09 06:38:28

tj,

Houses are advertised by payment all the time in CA’s central valley, and to some degree in the bay area as well.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by tj & the bear
2006-08-09 06:55:10

Hmmm, don’t see that much in L.A.

Still, do any of these ads exclude the total price completely like car dealer’s color classifieds??

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mrincomestream
2006-08-09 09:07:24

How appealing in print would this be.

Compton 2 bedroom 1 Bath 3,500.00 piti

Sign up today.

L.A.’s property is too expensive for that technique

 
Comment by Kiya
2006-08-09 10:08:20

Oh yeah, I see plenty of that in Memphis - in real estate ads in the paper, radio ads, as well as billboards…

“You can BUY your home for 850.00 dollars a month!” - no comment about actual price of the house, the type of loan, or whether that is I-only, P&I, or PITI…..plus HOA fees.

 
Comment by asuwest2
2006-08-09 11:40:49

Kiya, all of that is fully disclosed in the ad. It’s just in REALLY tiny type!

Billboard next to my office parking lot. 6 foot high letters advertising…xxxx, but if you stand still, right next to it, you can just make out that there is micro type disclosure at the bottom. Maybe 4 pt font, 20 feet up. Very readable.

 
Comment by tj & the bear
2006-08-09 13:06:25

mrincomestream,

The problem is you’re assuming 30 year fixed. Obviously, nobody buys that way anymore. Gotta give the neg-am rate and exclude the taxes & insurance! ;-)

 
Comment by mrincomestream
2006-08-09 18:17:37

tj-

Geez, yer right what was I thinking. I’m going to have to turn in my broker card now. I forgot the mantra. ;-)

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Dookie2
2006-08-09 05:41:17

snip;

As a bit of an aside, although the housing industry stocks have absolutely taken it on the chin lately, and the mortgage purchase apps are in a clear downtrend, the stocks of companies that finance residential real estate look nothing like their housing industry counterparts as you’ll see below. Why haven’t these stocks fallen as has real world real estate activity and the stocks of the homebuilders, etc.? It’s simple. Remember, as we’ve told you on many occasions now, the financial economy IS the real economy in the US. The fact that these stocks have not cratered is simply testimony to the fact that market participants are fully aware of this concept. At all costs, the Fed will protect the financial economy. Isn’t that really the overriding implicit bet in the broader financial markets these days? (Answer: Of course it is.) Moreover, in all likelihood, another set of banking industry executive brain surgeons may indeed take one or all of the folks you see below out in M&A deals. Wachovia was the first to jump into the real estate finance game after the cycle of a lifetime has already been completed with the Golden West merger. Who’s next? As you can see below, the stocks are waiting to find out. Yes, even highly risky sub prime lender New Century seems to implicitly be anticipating a bid. Oh well, banks and other large financial institutions seem to be doing what they do best in terms of market timing - buying exactly at the top of each cycle. As you know, the multiplicity of brokerage firm buyouts by the banks in the late 1990’s and early in this decade worked out so well that the mortgage lenders must be next, right?
———————

more

http://www.contraryinvestor.com/mo.htm
———————
snip;

We have just a few last historical perspectives that we believe are important in terms of trying to assess the forward question of whether residential real estate experiences a soft or hard landing as the total cycle plays itself out. Unfortunately neither of these will give us any kind of heads up tip off as to the character of the housing cycle path to come. They are more perspective on the magnitude of the cycle that has already played out. They are found in the GDP report, which is necessarily lagging data. But important in that they “show” us that the most recent residential real estate cycle is something completely different than anything experienced over the last half century at least. So as we watch the housing stocks and related indices ahead, the mortgage purchase data, as well as housing starts, permits data, etc., we believe these views of life help us frame the perspective of the cycle we have been living through up to this point.

As we look back over historical cycles of residential real estate investment as a percentage of GDP, we have to ask ourselves, does a minor soft landing follow the most extended US residential real estate investment cycle on record?

Comment by LaLawyer
2006-08-09 09:08:52

USATODAY - Mortgage applications rebound as rates lowest since March

http://tinyurl.com/z8h8a

My favorite quote “The worst of the housing market is behind us,” said Richard Yamarone, chief economist at Argus Research in New York, before the MBA data was published. “That’s simply because the two primary drivers of housing — interest rates and demographics — are improving.”

 
 
Comment by eastcoaster
2006-08-09 05:45:20

Neighbors (husband, wife, three children under the age of 5) who live in my apt. building (in a 2 BR unit) told me they’re going to put a bid on this house:
http://tinyurl.com/ppyy9

Owners said they’d consider any offers. My neighbors are going to offer $150,000. The owners have lived there forever (read any sales price is a profit for them) and supposedly made a comment as my neighbors were seeing the house that they, too, had three little boys when they first moved in (which makes my neighbors feel they now have a bond with the owners).

Neighbors make very so-so money (I’m not 100% sure how much, but I’d guess around what I make, maybe a bit more since she works part-time as well), their rent is about $20 less than mine per month (since they’re on the ground floor and I’m on the top), and they have more debt than I can imagine. They have not one nickel saved in the bank. I have no idea how they think they’ll be able to afford even a $150,000 house when they can’t save a cent while paying about 1/2 the PITI amount in rent, but that’s their issue.

My point to all this is . . . if their offer of $150,000 is accepted (I think it’s a long shot, but who knows), then call me the Queen of Lowballs because I’m going to start lobbing them in all over town. And I’ll hire their agent to do this for me if mine tells me she’s uncomfortable doing so (as she has seemed to indicate in the past).

Stay tuned . . .

Comment by flatffplan
2006-08-09 08:28:08

pray for them and skip the agent
5% is in the way of a deal……….

 
Comment by mrincomestream
2006-08-09 09:31:59

That’s really not a lowball offer eastcoaster at least not by my definition.
Lowball would be offering 103k or less. At 150k I’d still ask for closing costs. It’s a down market nationwide if you just have to buy now starting at 20-25% list might be a good place to start.

If your agent indicates that they don’t want to do what you want indicate that you will find someone who will. If your a first-time buyer no matter how confident you are unless you are a lawyer I would ignore the advice of flatffplan.

 
Comment by ajh
2006-08-10 03:34:59

I would hate to be bringing up three children in a 2-bed apartment. And once the oldest starts school, it won’t be any fun being one of the kids either. (Trust me on this one; from 7th grade to 12th grade I had to share a room with a brother 3 grades below me. It’s incredibly irritating even if you get on OK, because you just aren’t interested in the same things. And as for having friends over; forget it.)

Looking at the listing, if your neighbours are unsophisticated financially I could see them thinking that this is their only chance to get a house where (after subdividing the upstairs bedroom) they can give their kids a room each. Literally a once in a lifetime shot.

 
 
Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-08-09 05:47:17

For those of you who didn’t read the Las Vegas thread:

Ben Jones was interviewed in Newsweek.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/14252223/

Check out the posts in yesterday’s Las Vegas thread.

Comment by moqui
2006-08-09 06:23:00

Congrats Ben! I sure hope you summarize the insanity of the last couple of years in a book!
have to ask, are you blogging from a public restroom?

Comment by tj & the bear
2006-08-09 06:36:09

LMAO!

 
Comment by John Fontain
2006-08-09 09:22:47

Yeah, I noticed the cinder block walls and thought maybe you were blogging from a prison, but you weren’t wearing an orange jumpsuit. ;-)

Nice article. Its good to see that so many people visit your site frequently. You are doing a great service for those willing to listen and learn.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2006-08-09 06:27:20

CONGRAT BEN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Nice job hanging in there…

 
Comment by eastcoaster
2006-08-09 06:45:35

Great article Ben. Very impressive!

 
Comment by Thankfulrenter
2006-08-09 07:34:33

Well done Ben!

Has anyone read the other article about homeowners being crushed by their arms? One couple took out a HELOC to pay off their cars, credit card debt and the 6% fixed rate mortgage on the house. The starting interest was 5.25 and is now at 8%. What were they thinking? Now these people have my vote to be the poster children for the financially clueless that are about to get reamed.

Can you say @sspounding? Gooood, I knew you could.

 
Comment by ChrisO
2006-08-09 08:49:14

Congratulations!!! It takes a lot of balls to be the first one to get out there and say that the market is crazy.

 
Comment by arlingtonva
2006-08-09 08:55:30

The blog provides a global communication and media outlet that is cheap and easy to set up. It’s pretty facinating how this blog is having a significant affect on the marketplace and other blogs like dailykos are affecting the political scene.

Comment by arlingtonva
2006-08-09 09:02:32

The author of the great book ‘ The Tipping Point’ would describe Ben as a Maven and Connector.

 
 
 
Comment by edhopper
2006-08-09 05:47:47

I know someone still playing in the Fla RE market. (yeah, she knows the bubbles over.)
Bought a home listed for $500,000 at auction for $300,000. Figures she should still make a profit. Probably will, IF she can resell it.
But the sale also shows a 40% drop in price and closer to real value.

Comment by david cee
2006-08-09 08:01:05

Bought a home listed for $500,000 at auction for $300,000. Figures she should still make a profit. Probably will, “IF she can resell it.” Thats just plain stupid. I don’t care what she paid for it, there will be carrying costs, and if the market keeps dropping, and she can’t sell it, another dumb investor

 
 
Comment by cactus
2006-08-09 05:51:02

Looks like another house up for sale on my street. Thats 1 house with a SOLD sign- been for sale since before I moved here in May.
2 for SALE and 1 for RENT. This is in Phoenix.
Also watching price reductions in my old area 93021. One Townhome has been reduced 5 times in tiny increments. started at 479K now 449K. This has been listed since March 2006. I use realtor.com to watch these homes.

 
Comment by cactus
2006-08-09 05:55:58

http://tinyurl.com/jkrj8

Lets see if my tiny URL skills are working this am

Comment by cactus
2006-08-09 11:36:44

Agoura Hills. Thousand Oaks. Westlake Village. Their names are a tribute to the rolling hills, trees and lakes that dot the landscape.

So proud were they of their surroundings, the three Conejo Valley cities lobbied for several years to have a 16-mile stretch of the Ventura Freeway designated a scenic highway.

The state turned down the request because there were too many billboards, industrial parks and gas station signs lining the road. That was more than a decade ago.

Although the corridor that connects Los Angeles and Ventura counties is still known for its dramatic topography, these days, corporate headquarters and luxury homes define the valley. Further enhancing its image, a Four Seasons resort and spa is set to open in November, adding Westlake Village to its list of locations that include London, Paris, Singapore and Bangkok, Thailand.

Wealth and fame are no strangers to this area, home to five Fortune 500 companies: Countrywide Financial Corp., Dole Food Co., the Ryland Group Inc., Guitar Center Inc. and Amgen Inc., the world’s largest biotechnology firm, which for more than two decades has helped fuel the business boom.

The high-tech and healthcare companies that followed Amgen’s path — including divisions of Baxter Healthcare Corp. and WellPoint Inc.— brought to the area thousands of well-paid, white-collar professionals who were also drawn by the good schools and the Conejo Valley’s reputation as a safe community. The estimated median household income along the corridor ranges from $87,895 in Thousand Oaks to $128,684 in neighboring Westlake Village.

“It wasn’t always like it is today. There was a day when we would celebrate when a barbershop would open,” said Charles Cohen, a Thousand Oaks land use attorney who served as mayor from 1967 to 1972.

Bill Fulton, an urban planning expert and Ventura city councilman, said the core of the Conejo Valley was destined for white-collar exclusivity.

“Westlake Village and Thousand Oaks were originally developed as executive suburbs,” he said. “From the late ’50s forward, they were designed as a self-contained enclave for executives and middle managers. And businesses like to locate where the bosses live. That area tends to attract high-end jobs.”

Development in Westlake Village is on a tear. At the intersection of the Ventura Freeway and Lindero Canyon Road, crews, cranes and heavy machinery are visible on three projects that are under construction, including the Four Seasons. The six-story, 270-room hotel, set to open on the Dole Food campus in November, will be part of a 750,000-square-foot health resort that is the brainchild of Dole Food Chairman David Murdock, who has played a key role in the area’s upscale climb over the last 20 years.

Starting in the 1980s, the billionaire developer began transforming the rustic community of Lake Sherwood, on Ventura County’s eastern edge, into a posh residential enclave where homes are priced up to $25 million. Actor Will Smith and hockey legend Wayne Gretzky are among the celebrities who have called this area home.

During a ceremony at the construction site last year, Murdock said that creating a luxury health resort next to his privately held company’s headquarters has been a longtime goal. He said the resort — Four Seasons Westlake Village, which will include the California Wellbeing Institute — will offer a spa, nutritionists and “life coaches” to help attract health-conscious guests. The facility also will have a television production studio where programming on health and nutrition will be created.

“We started from the very beginning to build a complete wellness center,” Murdock said. “Sixty percent of the people in America are overweight, and 40% are absolutely obese. People are killing themselves by improper eating.”

The California Health and Longevity Institute in Santa Monica will oversee an 11,400-square-foot on-site medical clinic and diagnostic facility featuring nutritional laboratories and teaching kitchens. It also will employ staff cardiologists, radiologists and internal medicine specialists.

Across Lindero Canyon from the Four Seasons, Texas-based Huntington Hotel Group is building a 160-room Marriott Residence Inn, which is set to open next spring. Farther east of the Marriott is the project most visible from the freeway: Westlake Landmark, a two-building complex that will add 180,000 square feet of office space to the city.

Who’s to say that one of the office park’s new tenants won’t one day become a star on the Fortune 500? Amgen, for example, had modest beginnings. From sharing leased space in an office park, the biotechnology firm expanded until it took over the building, then the whole park, before stretching out on both sides of Rancho Conejo Boulevard. The company now has 45 buildings spread over 184 acres, with nearly 8,000 full-time employees.

After Amgen received FDA approval in 1989 for its anti-anemia drug Epogen and two years later for its drug Neupogen, which stimulates white blood cell production to help chemotherapy patients fight infections, Amgen’s financial growth skyrocketed.

“I remember the real estate depression in the early ’90s, yet for those of us in the Conejo Valley, we never felt it,” said Wayne Pearl, vice president of Amgen’s Thousand Oaks operations. “That was also during the days when Amgen stock was doing remarkably well, so a lot of people were moving up.”

The region also suffered only modest effects of the dot-com collapse a few years back and has continued to experience business growth, said Mark Schniepp, director of the California Economic Forecast in Santa Barbara.

“It’s because the labor force in the Conejo Valley was always very rich,” Schniepp said. “Once the workforce reaches critical mass, then companies start to move there.”

But there are also drawbacks to all the business growth.

“This used to be a nice bedroom community, and then all these companies came in and changed that,” said Kathy Kelley, who moved to Thousand Oaks more than 40 years ago when the Ventura Freeway had only two lanes and sheep grazed on both sides of the roadway.

“When you build companies, people come in and things change — home prices, the traffic,” said Kelley, whose husband, Bill, is a direct descendant of one of the valley’s pioneer farming families. “They really cater to the rich in the Conejo Valley now, that’s what it’s turned into,”

“It’s beautiful, but it’s very expensive,” she added. “My children … will never be able to afford homes here. That’s an unfortunate fact.”

Traffic is another problem. California Department of Transportation data indicate that thousands more vehicles now travel the freeway.

For example, a daily average of 185,000 vehicles, traveling in both directions, crossed the Hampshire Road intersection in Thousand Oaks in 1994. By 2004, that number had climbed to 193,000. And the freeway traffic at Parkway Calabasas increased from 192,000 in 1994 to 201,000 in 2004.

But more cars also mean more potential customers for the hotels and additional revenue for the city. Ray Taylor, Westlake Village city manager, said that even by conservative estimates, the hotels will add more than $1 million in occupancy and sales taxes a year, boosting city revenue by 15%.

“The Conejo Valley is in an enviable position: It has good-paying jobs, nice neighborhoods, and while the price of homes is up, it’s not like in Santa Barbara-Montecito,” said Dan Hamilton, director of economics for the UC Santa Barbara Economic Forecast. “It’s not intensely urban like L.A. or the [San Fernando] Valley, and the prospects for growth are very good.”
——————————————————————————-

this would be 91360 and 91361, if these RE prices go down ( and they did in the 1990’s ) then we really do have a crash.

Comment by sitting on the sideline
2006-08-09 13:20:06

I’ve been watching inventory grow in the Thousand Oaks area. In April 06 it started at 755 now it’s up to 1,100 homes.

The “prospects for growth are very good” is a good laugh. Amgen recently decided to move a few of their departments to Longmont, CO in the next few years. Countrywide, another big employer in that area, will go through lay-offs when the bubble pops. It’s already starting to crackle.

The Jones family can only keep up with each other for so long…

 
Comment by tj & the bear
2006-08-09 13:55:50

Househunted this area at the top of the last real estate cycle. Brand new 3K to 4K sf SFH for $400K to $600K. Those homes are now all $1.2 to $1.6. It’s gonna get ugly.

 
Comment by peter m
2006-08-09 19:46:11

Also include Newbury park in this region. There is a Four Season’s Hotel in beverly Hills(though not sure it’s a spa). There is also a top scientific Research Park/Corporation(Rockwell Scientific?) somewhere out in 1000 oaks( well hidden among all those oaks and hills).
Agree this area is a combination of rolling oak-studded hills, rustic eucalylptic-lined shady lanes(Old Conejo road?), new hot business contruction at Westlake village, Residential homes and parks set into rural pasture fields, ect. Hard as hell to deliver stuff out there, ecpecially out of south.Dwtn LA. Put Ths area as prime region for business location along with South OC, Valencia, Brea, ect.

 
 
 
Comment by House Inspector Clouseau
2006-08-09 06:14:12

Just got back from vacation the last week of July. Went to Seattle, Portland, and Vancouver.

I noted a few things:

1) Portland downtown is filled with highrise luxury condo complexes. You can’t take the free streetcar (love that!) more than 1 block without seeing another new highrise. Thing is: Portlanders don’t make that much money. Who is going to live in these $750k condos?

2) Seattle also has condos everywhere. There are lots of luxury towers from the Space Needle all down towards downtown, and then zillions of smaller condo complexes (3-6 stories high) especially throughout Capital Hill and First Hill. For any of you Seattlites wondering if you could have a bubble, I’ll tell you. YES.

3) Then on to Vancouver. The blogger from Vancouver has said this here before, but now I’m inclined to believe. Vancouver may be the biggest bubble market out there. Maybe even more than Phoenix and Las Vegas (yes I know it’s hard to believe). Vancouver downtown is almost all condo towers (I believe it holds the distinction of the only downtown in the world that’s over 70% residential). We saw more cranes in Vancouver than I’ve ever seen. I stood in southeast downtown Vancouver (near Granville Island and the science museum) and looked around and saw 12 cranes. 12!!!!!! I took a picture that had 8 cranes within just a few blocks of me, maybe like 5 blocks or so…. but the pic didn’t turn out. :(

If I recall correctly, Vancouver has about the same population as Portland… but Vancouver’s downtown is at least 10 times bigger. And it’s 5x bigger than Seattle’s. crazy.

But overbuilding wasn’t restrcted to the cities either. (except canada which has different zoning laws). we saw amazing overbuilding in Olympia, Tacoma, and even Vancouver WA. Are they kidding?

The Pacific NW is one of the most overbuilt (silently) areas of the country. Sorry guys.

Clouseau

Comment by ChrisO
2006-08-09 08:56:56

I’m from Portland originally, and my parents still live there. Downtown has indeed gone condo crazy, but the real fun is out in the burbs. The condo bust started way early out there, like several years ago, from what I recall. They built a light-rail system out to Beaverton and the western suburbs and did zoning stuff so that a whole bunch of condos got built around the light-rail stops. “Smart growth” and all that. Well guess what? No one wanted these crappy little suburban condos, and many of the projects languished, even as SFHs went crazy in the same suburbs. You are dead on about Portlanders not making all that much money, either. There are a lot of California equity refugees, and a few decent large employers there, but nothing that provides huge wealth. One of the saddest parts is that downtown Portland used to be kinda funky and cool–a bit weird and ‘off’ in an artsy way–and all of the overpriced condos and cookie-cutter yuppie businesses that followed made downtown really tacky, plastic, and just plain uninteresting. :(

 
Comment by Kim
2006-08-09 10:18:07

“The Pacific NW is one of the most overbuilt (silently) areas of the country. Sorry guys.”

This isn’t news to us. We live here.

 
Comment by seattle price drop
2006-08-09 13:04:12

Thanks for the report Clouseau. Yes, Seattle’s a huge bubble. The 400K/2004 homes that miraculously became 1 million dollar and up 2005/06 homes tell the story.

The “cheaper” First Hill condos that you mentioned are already being price reduced: 425K last month, 360K this month.

The amount of denial here, coupled with a lack of healthy skepticism when it comes to local news, convinced a lot of people that we’re different.

And I have to say, the press had been all over this one since last Fall, rushing in to assure Seattleites every time bad National RE news arrived, that we were indeed “different”.

If there was even one bidding war in a neighborhood, that’s what got the spotlight. The price reduced properties in same neighbnorhood were completely ignored and denied (realtor speak: they were “overpriced to begin with” ! LOL!)

Thank God for Zip Realty and the county tax records, that was the ONLY place truth was to be found.

The good news is: Just this week, the local press started admitting we’ve got a problem on our hands. Bad credit, bad loans, price reductions, long DOM’s, slowing sales, rising inventory and now finally, stagnant median.

The median’s been stagnant for about 3 months and inventory’s been rising since early spring. This is the FIRST they’ve reported on it.

It wasn’t long ago they were encouraging young people to do whatever it takes to get into a home they can’t afford. Advice like: cut back on all other expenses, buy with friends, etc. Pity the poor people who took their advice.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2006-08-09 06:29:50

I don’t know if there is enough interest in this topic, but one of the side effects of this building/housing boom is the issue of eminent domain and the abuse of this concept, by no less than the Supreme Court. Parade Magazine, a syndicated Sunday supplement to many local newspapers, had a big article on it this past Sunday. It was very enlightening, but also scary at the same time. I can’t even see how anyone, much less a Supreme Court justice, could rule that it was OK for any government, whether federal, state or local, to take a person’s home and re-sell it to a developer. For any reason. I can understand taking a home for the building of schools, parks, roadways, government facilities, etc. But re-selling it to a developer who is going to build luxury homes, condos, malls or whatever is outrageous, I don’t care what the argument is. In some cases, local governments take nice, modest, but older neighborhoods and declare them “blighted” and then hand them over
to the developer. This to me is one of the most disgusting outcomes of this bubble and is unprecedented in the history of this country. The only possible upside I can see from this practice is that this could be used in reverse on failed developments during the crash. As far as I am concerned, many of the marginal developments in Florida are already far more blighted than the traditional neighborhoods. And there was an article on the Raw Story website over the weekend about gangs flourishing in the gated communities of the Poconos in Pennsylvania. Turns out, people in the gated communities, because of the nature of the developments, have less recourse to local law enforcement than someone in a traditional neighborhood. So much for the perceived safety of a gated community.

Comment by txchick57
2006-08-09 06:34:10

Yes, I’m also following this issue after the Supreme Court ruling last winter on that Massachusetts or RI case (can’t remember the state). Very interesting ruling given the so-called “property rights” agenda of the current administration. It has caused at least some state legislatures to begin work on trying to close up the loopholes in their own areas.

Comment by palmetto
2006-08-09 06:53:45

txchick, great minds think alike! It was in New London, Connecticut and I was very interested in it because I have family in CT. Those homeowners fought a valiant fight. I don’t know what the laws are in other states, but here in Florida, if the government wants to take your property by eminent domain, they have to also pay the bills for the attorney of your choosing to fight it.

 
Comment by Moman
2006-08-09 07:13:41

Kelo vs. New Haven

Comment by Moman
2006-08-09 07:14:28

I meant New London, EDIT

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by BearCat
2006-08-09 07:32:29

txchick - I was also disgusted by Kelo v New London (especially since I’ve even driven through that neighborhood). But it’s fair to point out that the SCOTUS justices that voted for the decision were the “liberal” ones (Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer), and the “conservative” ones (Scalia, Thomas, Rehnquist, O’Connor - all Republican appointees) dissented. I’m sure Roberts (appointed by Bush to replace to Rehnquist) and Alito (appointed by Bush to replace O’Connor) also would’ve dissented.

If you want to start an effort to get the Kelo five off the bench, I’ll join.

Comment by txchick57
2006-08-09 10:29:42

I know. The dissent was a classic.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by conradplato
2006-08-09 08:57:23

The eminent domaine rule was for CT coastline area property — Old Saybrook in specific. The quick question I had was how does it work when the market drops? They get to take the property at a market price. You bought above market. You lose big. You owe the bank for the mortgage above what you were forced to sell at and you owe the IRS when you can’t pay the bank and they write it off.

 
 
Comment by Mole Man
2006-08-09 09:01:14

The Supreme Court found their own decision distasteful. That is why their own decision had specific language about their need to enforce the law as it is written, not as they would like it, and including a detailed description of what states need to do to avoid this problem in the future. It is funny that the same folks who complain about the supremes making things up as they go along refuse to see the truth in this even though the decision included this extra language. It is rare for supreme court decisions to include a formula for a workaround.

Comment by ChrisO
2006-08-09 09:09:03

It was as much about 200 years of precedent from previous Supreme Court decisions as it was the text of the Fifth Amendment. The 5th seems pretty clear on its face in not permitting govt. to abuse the eminent domain process the way it has, but the Court had to deal with all of its previous decisions that had basically told governments they could take property for almost any reason, as long as they could invent some wild theory of ‘public benefit.’ And the Supreme Court is extremely reluctant to overturn its previous decisions, particularly where the interpretations are long-standing. Of course, back in the old days govts. had slightly more respect for the concept of private property than they do today, so we’ll see…

 
Comment by palmetto
2006-08-09 09:39:36

Interesting, Mole Man, I actually didn’t know about the extra language. I guess that has given impetus for states to close the loopholes. Thanks for the clarification.

 
Comment by sf jack
2006-08-09 09:55:22

“The Supreme Court found their own decision distasteful.”

********

There’s another way to look at Mole Man’s comment.

This may have been posted before (last summer?), but an acquaintance recently told me that Justice Souter’s property in NH might be the “victim” of such an eminent domain taking.

I just found this:

“Eminent domain this! Justice’s farm is target

Petition to N.H. city claims hotel development would serve public good

The Associated Press

Updated: 11:17 a.m. PT June 29, 2005

WEARE, N.H. - Following a Supreme Court ruling last week that gave local governments more power to seize private property, someone has made what appears to be a tongue-in-cheek pitch to take over Justice David Souter’s New Hampshire farmhouse and turn it into a hotel.”

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8406056/

 
 
Comment by ChrisO
2006-08-09 09:04:01

Eminent domain abuse has been going on for decades. I recall one of the most notorious abusers was Atlantic City, NJ. The city ‘condemned’ lots of private property and then gave it to Donald Trump to develop a bunch of casinos. Interesting definition of “public use” there, I’d say. Back in the day, courts were understandably reluctant to second-guess condemnation decisions, simply because it is a necessary power for govt. to have. Even the founders of our country, who were extremely suspicious of any govt. infringement on property, conceded that. But all of those years of a hands-off approach by the courts gave license to corrupt politicians to misuse the eminent domain process for the benefit of their large developer cronies. Hopefully, all state govts. will act quickly to stop these abuses.

 
Comment by peter m
2006-08-09 20:05:05

You can go to areas just west of downtown LA and watch all the razing down of the admittedly blighted neighborhoods just west of the 110 fwy, and the tremendous amount of new mid-high rise structures going up. There would’nt be much local neighborhood resistence in these areas as they are almost 100% immigrant occupied, and the eminent-domain process must be relatively smooth going here.
The SC eminent Domain Ruling was made-to-order for a big monster city Government such as LA, which is currently in process of doing a complete make-over of the old Bunker hill neighborhood(mentioned above). One of the newfangled bldgs just completed is the new hdqtrs of the LAUSD, right off the 110.

 
 
Comment by kipper
2006-08-09 06:31:03

Does anyone know anything about the companies/people who post signs next to freeway offramps saying “We buy houses” or “Buy your House” and a phone number. What is that all about?

Also, and this is really off topic, but has anyone in So Cal seen those decals that are a 6 inch (approx) square and have a black & white lined qeometric shape that fits into the square shape and has a little blue rectangle also tucked into the square? I see them everywhere, on freeway signs and overpasses, electric or phone service boxes etc. but they don’t say anything. Just a shape. Does anyone know what they are?

Comment by Geoff
2006-08-09 10:00:19

I have to wonder about people who have the free time to remove street spam, but I bet somebody here could answer the question.

http://www.causs.org/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=14

 
Comment by peter m
2006-08-09 20:41:51

Bet those signs which offer to buy your house are some type of scam run by bunko boiler plate operations manned by marginal phone operators offering to buy from distressed homeowners. There are probably hundreds of these RE Scam ops taking place all over LA, probably run by Bunko RE Scam artists, who may or may not be Realtors/brokers, looking for easy prey(old retired folks, naive immigrants, ect) to sign over their homes/deeds for a little quick cash.
LA has always been the biggest region for all types of frauds and scams. There will be a lot of corrupt RE scam activity out there as more and more homeowners fall behind in their payments, or face foreclosure. As the Re bubble slowly or rapidly collapses, the RE vultures will swoop in and look for victims to shread.

 
 
Comment by stok
2006-08-09 06:41:03

http://www.huntsvillealabamausa.com/new_exp/community_data/econ_performance/homesales.html

Do you think Huntsville Al can have dropping home prices ?

Positives for the area :
Most densly populated engineering grads in nation.
NASA and major defense contractors are here
More defense jobs coming due to BRAC
Even with major appreciation still one of cheapest housing market.
Sales of homes tracking historic averages

Negatives
Inventory climbing steadily

Comment by tj & the bear
2006-08-09 14:20:00

In a word? Yes! If humans live there, psychology reigns.

 
 
Comment by Lisa
2006-08-09 06:45:26

Here’s the SF Chronicle’s take on the impact of the Fed pause on housing….”Stable or falling rates could prop up the faltering housing market, but don’t expect too much…it’s a momentum driven affair…once the market turns, it stays turned for a while…at some point prices will adjust downward and the affordability gap will begin to narrow. That will serve to prop up the market.”

This is the first time I’ve seen some pretty bearish comments in our local paper. Pity all those folks who bought into the madness.

Comment by SunsetBeachGuy
2006-08-09 07:48:01

The OC Register interviewed McCulley of Pimco on the pause.

Here is what he said about housing.

http://blogs.ocregister.com/lansner/

Q. How big a role did shaky housing market play in Fed’s decision?
A. Huge.
Q. What does this mean for mortgages?
A. Mortgage rates down a touch over last month, likely to hover ’round here, even as “affordable” product — pay options, neg am stuff — abates with tighter underwriting standards and fear.
Q. Should I keep my adjustable mortgage? Is the rising-payment pain over?
A. Yes.
Q. Which is worse for housing: higher rates previously feared or the economic weakness the Fed’s sniffing?
A. What’s bad for housing is that it has turned, as a result of hikes plus spent speculative forces. Housing is the most reflexive market in the world. Very momentum driven, hard to turn, but once it’s turned, it stays turned.
Q.”Soft landing” or disaster ahead for housing?
A. Somewhere in between. How about a hard-soft landing?

Comment by SunsetBeachGuy
2006-08-09 07:49:03

What is sad is, I don’t think most OCR readers understand the term reflexive and won’t look it up.

 
Comment by sf jack
2006-08-09 10:03:48

“Q. How big a role did shaky housing market play in Fed’s decision?
A. Huge.”

******

To me, this reinforces the idea that Janet Yellen has been “asking” the FOMC to stop raising rates for some time, as she thought it was hurting the housing market.

San Francisco-based Janet Yellen, I might add.

Comment by sf jack
2006-08-09 10:11:20

And also, for the first time, I’m beginning to wonder if those who think this blog could perhaps be having an impact on the Fed are correct.

The MSM has used the HBB and others as a canary in the coal mine kind of thing… and has jumped on the deflating bubble rather quickly, thereby raising the consiousness of how quickly housing has turned.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by peter m
2006-08-09 21:07:08

I wonder if the fed is more scared of a slowing economy at this point than rising inflation? Certain Experts such as John Maudlin have pointed to a very good chance of an upcoming recession, based on past historical economic charts and scenarios.
It would not surprize me if the fed is responding to pressure from the Homeowners and the RE/industrial complex in their decision, especially with the midterms only 3 months away. Nothing would swing an election cycle more that bad economic news, especially bad unemployment figures. Your average joe-six-pac is more concerned with employment and jobs than rising inflation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by elo from the block
2006-08-09 11:03:00

Q.”Soft landing” or disaster ahead for housing?
A. Somewhere in between. How about a hard-soft landing?

How about a “poached” landing….pretty firm on the outside with a gooey mess on the inside.

 
 
Comment by lalaland
2006-08-09 08:42:29

Here’s a link to the SF Chronicle article Lisa mentioned:

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/08/09/BUGTEKDFD51.DTL

Kathleen Pender, the article’s author, is actually a pretty level-headed finance columnist. Unfortunately, she doesn’t normally cover the real estate beat. (A beat which is of course covered by a writer entirely untrained in finance/economics, the very silly Carol Lloyd).

Comment by sf jack
2006-08-09 09:59:22

Yes.

Carol is really an entertainment writer writing about things related (sometimes quite tangentially) to real estate.

The Chronicle is the lamest major city newspaper in all of America. It’s embarrassing.

 
 
 
Comment by Nikki
2006-08-09 07:10:10

I posted this in another thread, but am floored at the candor of this local realtor in Balto City. He sells in the sity’s hottest areas of Canton, Federal Hill and Fells Point, and this blurb give you an idea of his mentality.

“There’s really no end in sight for this downward turn. There is so much inventory out there right now, that it will take quite some time to be absorbed. We will see this area continue to drop in price until the buyers come back. Who knows when that will be. Sellers have to become more realistic in pricing. The buyers simply can’t afford to pay prices that have risen nearly 100% in the last 5 years while incomes have made under 20% increases.”

http://tinyurl.com/rt3zg

Comment by Mo Money
2006-08-09 08:46:04

” incomes have made under 20% increases.””

Try 5%…

 
Comment by seattle price drop
2006-08-09 14:57:37

Nikki-

this is great news about Baltimore.

If I’m not mistaken, you are the poster who kept complaining about the local media pumping Baltimore unashamedly (in the face of all evidence to the contrary) for the past several months.

The same thing was happening in Seattle. This week, for the first time we had our taste of local media here saying RE was “cooling”. HUGE step!

Looks like the last of the denial towns are falling!

 
 
Comment by jh in ohio
2006-08-09 07:29:42

Off topic: I’d like to know what everybody is doing to position themselves to profit from the bubble bursting. I’ve heard a couple things already since I’ve been watching this blog: investing in commodities such as gold, silver… and shorting homebuilding related stocks.
One of the things that struck me is that if things really do turn out like has been predicted on this blog two things are going to happen: lots of homes will be put on the rental market (already happening with some flippers) and lots of people will go bankrupt. I know from unfortunate personal experience that finding a place to rent after bankruptcy is difficult. So, my idea is to build a listing service where people with bankruptcy can find someone willing to rent to them. Basically bringing the FB’s together with the flippers :) I’ve put up the beta site . Email me your feedback (jh@rentafterbankruptcy.com) or post your comments here.
So, what other creative ideas are you guys exploring? Anybody going back to school for bankruptcy or real estate law? Definitely a growth industry :)

Comment by david cee
2006-08-09 08:09:40

The homeowners in foreclosure that have no equity are moving into a rental house the weekend before the trustee auction, so there is no foreclosure on their credit report. So many homeowners have decent jobs, but the mortgage payments are just too much of a burden. They can rent a house for half of their
mortgage. They can hold off BK’s for a while

Comment by mrincomestream
2006-08-09 09:39:36

“The homeowners in foreclosure that have no equity are moving into a rental house the weekend before the trustee auction, so there is no foreclosure on their credit report.”

That’s not how that works. If the bank takes it back it’s a foreclosure period.

 
 
Comment by Polo Bear
2006-08-09 09:14:21

The problem is …a lot of the FBs ARE flippers!
Bwahahah!

 
Comment by sigalarm
2006-08-09 09:28:04

I will be honest, I don’t think I know enough about things like the stock market to really play with shorting companies. My approach is if I don’t understand it, I don’t mess with it. Probably comes from being a software guy and watching too many chimps who think they can create systems create problems (that I can make $$ cleaning up).

Anyhow, at present I don’t know what to do about making money in the probable downturn in the future. I recognize that I think it is coming, so I am trying to bring as much revenue forward (into NOW) that I can before my customers decide to hold onto their money. That cash is going into CDs to help carry the company during what could be some lean times ahead. I just hope we can get enough in to bridge ourselves. Should be ok if the downturn is not too harsh, but I fear it might be.

That being said, there are lots of sharp money people here. Maybe some of them can give you strategy. BTW, good idea with the web site, but be careful as if there is any real market there, much bigger fish will come in too.

Comment by Peter T
2006-08-09 11:12:41

I am not financially savy either, but I had an idea:
Are not REITs created for letting you invest in real estate without actually having to become a landlord. Is there a way to bet on the devaluation of a REIT? Especially one with large holdings of land or residential real estate?

Regards,

Peter

 
 
Comment by Big V
2006-08-09 12:11:33

Hi JH:

Save your money with Emigrant Direct or some other high-yield online account and wait till the bottom to buy a house. RE will probably be undervalued in a couple of years.

You may also consider putting your money in a CD for safekeeping.

There are lots of other investment strategies out there (some of which I’m currenlty engaged in), but they all carry risk and may erode your future house money.

 
 
Comment by samk
2006-08-09 07:33:00

I just checked the local recorder’s database and all I can say is…damn. I forecast pain in the near future for the other homeowners in my family. All of them have refi’d into ARMs that are set to adjust in the near future. Looks like most of their payments will be going up by 2%. And then up more every six months thereafter.

Also, their riders, every last one, says that their interest rates will never be below their initial rate.

Comment by lalaland
2006-08-09 08:33:00

Can I ask where you live? I’m curious because my local recorder’s office in the Bay Area doesn’t offer such detailed info on the types/terms of mortgages people have taken out. (Though I’d love it if they did.) Maybe California doesn’t allow so much info to public? Or is it just my county?

Comment by lalaland
2006-08-09 08:35:11

Oh, I see just below that you’re in Florida.

Comment by samk
2006-08-09 09:33:16

Actually, I live in Pennsylvania.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by lalaland
2006-08-09 16:02:07

Thanks for the tip. Helpful.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by samk
2006-08-09 07:52:04

http://orlando.craigslist.org/rfs/191946690.html

I found this Orlando Craigslist post funny.

Comment by BM
2006-08-09 08:27:15

That house sold for $55k in 1997, and $143k just last year in June.

 
Comment by jp
2006-08-09 08:27:42

:) She makes it sound like a hostage situation.

 
Comment by Left LA Behind
2006-08-09 08:56:18

Wow. That is a new attempt to motivate someone to buy your house - belittle them for renting.

AT THE END OF THE YEAR I WILL STILL HAVE A NICE HOUSE, TAX WRITE OFF. What will you have, a bunch of rent receipts

I love the “playground” tone…

Comment by Moman
2006-08-09 10:07:07

I’ll have a nice fat bank account and you’ll have a depreciating asset (cough cough expense)

 
 
Comment by Big V
2006-08-09 12:16:26

I e-mailed the buyer. Told them to keep the house. This is fun!

 
 
Comment by memphis
2006-08-09 08:50:03

SEE THIS HOUSE BUY THIS HOUSE, or I’m going to keep it and rent it out and KEEP THE EQUITY FOR MYSELF. AT THE END OF THE YEAR I WILL STILL HAVE A NICE HOUSE, TAX WRITE OFF. What will you have, a bunch of rent receipts.

Which is why you are screaming in all caps to sell it?

I’m having trouble even imagining what these desperation ads will look like a year or 18 months from now.

I know this is old ground, but I have yet to see a convincing answer to one big question. What happens to all those foreclosures? For every renter with a plan, patiently waiting for the depreciation cycle to play out, there’s going to be 20 foreclosed homes and 20 dispossessed home debtors who won’t be in a position to buy anytime soon. “Banks don’t want to be landlords” is the stock answer, but in a panic market, they won’t be able to give those foreclosures away. An empty, unmaintained house is even more money lost to damage and decay. Plus, you board up the crap new subdivisions and even “nice” homes, tell me where the evicted all go? Somebody’s got to get into the landlord business.

I can almost envision banks foreclosing and then renting back to the ex-owner. Sounds loony, but who *else* are they going to rent to, the recently evicted FBer next door?

(And yes, I did read a recent comment here about this being an opportunity for childless singles or couples to “housesit” for cheap rent. Nice work if you can get it, but I don’t think the banks are going to worry about having a property properly “staged” if it’s not going to sell anytime soon. And if they don’t want to be traditional landlords, they’ll really love being bargain basement tradeoff-for-housesitting landlords.)

 
Comment by tom stone
2006-08-09 09:38:10

abnks can’t hold on to non performing assets like reo’s,some will probably form a separate company ,maybe a reit,sell the reo’s to them in bunches,perhaps a subdivision at a time.anyone in a position to take more than 1 or two homes off the banks books will be in a good bargaining position,and i’d be surprised if there aren’t a few llc’s being formed right now to do that.the eaarly ones will get burned,but the folks who cherrypick in late 07 and on should do quite well.

 
Comment by susanmenchey
2006-08-09 10:46:02

is anyone familiar with re market in portland me ? my dad died in august leaving an eyesore in a gated community. my sister (unfortunately, his executor) said she had an offer for 300k for it. i told her to jump at it whereupon she screamed that she would’nt take a penny less than 350k and slammed the phone up in my ear. any advice on how to deal with this situation? i know six months from now i’ll be able to say “i told you so” but i’m the one being f@cked too.

Comment by Big V
2006-08-09 12:22:58

Hi Susan:

Your sister sounds like she’s loving this power trip. I have a strong feeling that she will purposely go against whatever you say, so try getting a real estate agent to contact her without divulging the fact that you sent him/her.

Perhaps the RE can talk sense into her.

Comment by tj & the bear
2006-08-09 14:31:21

Option 1: Tell her to re-fi it and cash you out based on the $300K.
Option 2: Tell her you’ll agree to take half the proceeds from a sale at $300K as long as she guarantees that amount (in writing), regardless of the sale price. That way, any (imaginary) profit above $300K is hers and any (potentially real) loss below it is also hers as well.
Option 3: Threaten a partition lawsuit.

Sounds rough, but she’s the one screaming at you.

 
 
Comment by Diggs
2006-08-09 14:29:14

I live 45 minutes from Portland, Me. I don’t know for sure but i believe the market is like everywhere else up here,….DEAD.

Good luck. I wouldn’t do anything BTW, let her call you and apologize.

 
 
Comment by Salinasron
2006-08-09 11:25:19

Went to Costco this am. Guess what? They’ve heavily started stocking Xmas stuff in the front of the store (toys, bikes,etc). This tells me they expect a slow down in Xmas sales and want people to start their purchases early before the second installment of property taxes, higher gas prices, CC debt, etc start competing for those Xmas dollars.

Comment by CA renter
2006-08-10 04:06:49

Good catch, Salinasron. Agree very much with your theory.

 
 
Comment by memphis
2006-08-09 11:25:28

Funny…I’ve got a story like that, too. My husband is one of 10+ beneficiaries of a trust where the stepkids (children of the spouse who passed earlier) are co-beneficiaries, and also the trustees. My understanding is that they originally (earlier this year) wanted to buy the house that will be liquidated in the trust (not so far north of San Francisco is as specific as I should probably get). They didn’t maintain the place or deal with Spring storm damage, and now they have the house listed and sitting asking last year’s best comps, with any notion of buying it themselves, scuttled. (Original plan was that house would be emptied in Jan and listed in Feb; it finally went on the market in June.)

I’m betting any hope of recovering from the trustees for their decision to hold things up will depend on proving malfeasance (not just incompetency). I just hate the notion of the lawyers mopping up on this times probably thousands of similar situations. Wish I could tell you what to do, would find that answer useful myself.

Comment by michelleinmd
2006-08-09 12:35:59

ah, yes. the jointly inherited home. i advise EVERYONE who is in this situation to sell the property and it has nothing to do with a housing bubble. multiple people with multiple situations/needs/ preferences/money don’t do well owning property together. i’ve never seen it work.

Comment by sfbayqt
2006-08-10 09:36:03

Ditto on that. Same situation in my family, my ex-husband’s family, and in a close friend’s family. My stepmother (age 78, my dad passed away several years ago) wants my sister and I to sell the property and divvy it up among pre-designated relatives. Ex-hubby’s dad was one of 15 sibs to inherit 30 acres of land, but only one has been paying the prop taxes. Now, some of the sibs are gone which leaves their children who have any interest in the property. The number of people heir to this land has grown exponentially and it hasn’t been easy to get everyone on board with decisions or even to *find* everyone. Oh, boy….what a mess it is.

BayQT~

 
 
 
Comment by Chilipepr
2006-08-09 12:23:48

http://www.boston.com/business/ticker/2006/08/mass_a_leader_i.html

Mass. a leader in foreclosures, home price reductions
Two new reports on the housing market in Massachusetts and elsewhere offer a glimpse of a weak market where foreclosures continue to rise and where in some communities more than half the homes on the market have had their asking prices reduced.

In one report, the town of Newton tops a national list of cities and suburbs in the percentage of homes on the market at least a month that have had their asking prices reduced. That same report, the first of its kind from national online real estate agency Zip Realty, ranks Massachusetts second only to California among states with cities in the top 20 for percentage of price-reduced homes.

The second report, from research firm RealtyTrac Inc., reported that foreclosure filings in the metropolitan Boston market increased by 181.1 percent in the second quarter of 2006 compared with the same period a year ago. In the second quarter the area had 1,823 foreclosure filings, which is the first step taken by lenders toward reclaiming properties from delinquent mortgage holders. That’s one foreclosure for every 1,243 households.

Both reports were released today.
(By Keith Reed, Globe staff)

 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-08-09 13:11:16

Treasury yield curve conundrum:

If the long end stays well below the short end, it looks like a recession is on the way.

But if the long end goes up, so will long-term mortgage rates, making the housing market crash harder.

Which case is more appealing?

http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates/index.html

 
Comment by txchick57
2006-08-09 13:16:58

This one made me feel dirty to read:

http://dallas.craigslist.org/sls/192006669.html

Comment by Getstucco
2006-08-09 13:55:55

TxChick –

That is a good indication of where I believe we are headed. Soon the most valuable assets will be inflation-insured savings and a good credit record. But it sounds like some investers are trying to find suckers willing to trade their valuable credit ratings for $$$…

 
 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-08-09 13:20:50

I’m guessing that now that housing prices have allegedly reached a permanently high plateau, many interested parties would like to keep them there, or push them even higher (Fed, Fannie, NAR, MBA, etc.). Is it possible to do this with a record number of vacant homes in the USA? Because it seems to me that the builders have an incentive to keep building so long as prices are inflated to a level where they can profitably build and sell, but so long as they keep building, the oversupply imbalance will simply worsen. Unfortunately, the alternative seems to be housing deflation (with the associated draining of the housing ATM machine) to restore the equilibrium between housing supply and demand.

Any thoughts about whether it is possible to artificially prop up prices without a steadily worsening imbalance? (I cannot see how this can work out over time, but I admit my vision has limitations…)

Comment by Kim
2006-08-09 14:02:49

It would be impossible to prop up prices without increasing the imbalances because wages would have to come in line with prices, and I can’t see that happening in these days of outsourcing a immigration. Maybe the question should be whether it is possible to prop up prices at all.

Comment by Peter T
2006-08-09 14:11:47

Inflate, inflate, inflate! If this doesn’t help, inflate more. Ruin the economy for saving some flippers.

Comment by tj & the bear
2006-08-09 14:44:10

Yes, but inflate how???

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by feepness
2006-08-09 16:24:08

By having the government send everyone a check.

Sound crazy? Already happened a couple times in the last few years. You can’t borrow money… don’t worry, the US Gov will borrow FOR you.

Second option… buy MBS securities with freshly minted money. Turn bad loans into real cash… ready to be loaned against again!

 
Comment by CA renter
2006-08-10 04:10:05

Exactly, feepness. One of my greatest worries in this mess.

 
 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-08-09 15:11:46

Peter,

How do you inflate without crashing the dollar, and convincing our foreign creditors (those terrible Asians who consistently save us under the table) from withdrawing their loanable funds from our mortgage market?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Peter T
2006-08-09 18:31:10

> How do you inflate without crashing the dollar

You don’t. My remark to inflate was ironic: I do not want hyperinflation and the ruin of the economy for saving some flippers.

 
 
 
 
Comment by lalaland
2006-08-09 16:10:22

I always try to think of historical examples: Has any set of government/quasi-government agencies/financial systems anywhere been able to pull such a feat off? (The permanently high asset price plateau, even in the face of seriously worsening fundamentals, and where it all just turned out fine.) My guess is a big no, or we would have heard about such an example from the NAR/MBA ad nauseum by now. Or maybe someone knows of one?

 
Comment by ajh
2006-08-10 04:07:11

I can think of a way in which it could be done, but the mechanism would almost certainly be politically impossible as it would imply a loss of state sovereignty.

Have the Federal Government impose severe restrictions on new subdivision.

 
 
Comment by Peggy
2006-08-09 14:10:01

Front page of today’s Business section in The Atlanta-Journal Constitution claims “Housing Bust? Not Here: Home builders are clinging to metro Atlanta’s market stability like storm-tossed sailors.”

“Atlanta’s home sales remain high, although unsold inventories of new homes are rising and it’s taking longer to sell existing homes…Local economists, however, are tracking demographic data indicating the number of people moving to Atlanta is higher than the number of new jobs being created. [Economist Donald] Ratajczak said that may suggest that many of the region’s newest residents are retirees.”

I’m not so sure I’d come to the same conclusion. I have several friends in Atlanta and Roswell (north of Atlanta). Lately, they’ve all been talking about how Atlanta has been discovered by investors–both because they’ve watch houses being sold to flippers at what by local standards are very inflated prices, and also because Atlanta is now featured on a cable TV house-flip show. Here’s hoping the TinyURL to the AJC article works…it’s my first:

http://tinyurl.com/faxw4

P.S. Ben–congrats on your Newsweek interview. Great read!

Comment by feepness
2006-08-09 16:25:28

We need a compilation of all the “Not here!” articles so I can send it to all my “Not here!” friends located in different cities.

 
 
Comment by DannyHSDad
2006-08-09 14:29:17

Gardena, CA home listing report:

Just near my parents’ place, there is a home for 1555 sq feet just put on the market for $570K! In Cedar Park, TX [next to Austin], we sold our 2690 sq feet home for $230K, Nov’2005 (we lost a good chuck of money, too).

People in this neighborhood couldn’t possibly be making in the 6 figures so you’ve got to wonder who could afford such a home? [I personally no longer believe in getting a loan to buy a house anymore but when I did, I would pay no more than 2.5 times my annual income so this neighborhood is more than what I could have afforded....]

 
Comment by tj & the bear
2006-08-09 17:32:30

From the Mogambo Guru’s latest E-economic Newsletter:

This gem, in USA Today, read “The Bush administration opposes including Social Security and Medicare in the audited deficit. Its reason: Congress can cancel or cut the retirement programs at any time, so they should not be considered a government liability for accounting purposes.” Hahaha! If you want a good feel for your future Social Security benefits, here it is! They already know it’s going to be slashed, and so they don’t even have to account for it!

Let’s see:
* Fixed pensions bankrupting to PBGC, which itself is bankrupt.
* Home equity going bye-bye.
* 401K’s and dividends going bye-bye when markets tank.
* Negative savings rate.
* CDs paying nothing, inflation-adjusted.
* “Cancel or cut” social security & medicare.

Figure in skyrocketing energy, food, healthcare… looks like all those prudent folks that bought homes in the 70’s & 80’s may not be able to afford to stay in their homes, either.

Comment by Peter T
2006-08-09 18:37:14

> like all those prudent folks that bought homes in the 70’s & 80’s may not be able to afford to stay in their homes, either

The prudent folk should have burnt their mortgage by now, and any moving would only increase their costs. If their property taxes rise above a limit, they should be put as a tax lien on the property instead.

 
Comment by ajh
2006-08-10 04:16:55

But can Congress cancel the (interest and principal) obligations to the SS Trust Fund without a general Treasury default? Alternatively, can they divert SS contributions while failing to pay pensions?

If neither, then surely some sort of SS benefit would continue indefinitely simply by using the Payroll contributions and Trust Fund interest.

 
 
Comment by Davey Jones
2006-08-10 01:08:15

Sure, they can cut/slash gov’t pensions and social security. I’m in both.

But then I can guarantee you that EVERY person over the age of 61 will vote against the Repubs in the next election. And that is a huge formidible block of voters.

Comment by CA renter
2006-08-10 04:17:44

Won’t matter. Democrats (and Independents, for that matter) won’t have a better answer, IMHO. To me, this (retirement and healthcare obligations) is the **REALLY BIG** issue we face in the future. It’s one of the reasons many of us “gloom and doom” bears see very hard times in the future. Buying a “dream house” might just be the least of our worries. What TJ didn’t mention in that post (but I know he’s aware of it) is declining “real” wages.

The only way I see out of this mess is hyperinflation. It’s why we have the whole deflation/hyperinflation debate. Both are likely to happen. The question is, which one happens first?

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post