September 30, 2006

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For September 30, 2006

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here!




RSS feed | Trackback URI

175 Comments »

Comment by Vmaxer
2006-09-30 04:01:10

Here’s some good charts to ponder.

http://macromavens.com/reports/July.06.RE.ChartWrap.pdf

Comment by JungleJim
2006-09-30 17:16:58

WARNING:ADOBE

 
 
Comment by Penina
2006-09-30 04:03:08

BUBBLE ALERT - BUBBLE ALERT - BUBBLE ALERT

The next bubble has been identified.

Many here have been wondering what, after housing, beanie babies, pet rocks, and the .com bubble, will be THE NEWEST NEXT BUBBLE.

Wonder no more.

If you’re sitting on some real estate you can’t sell and it has a yard….. perfect! You can start your new business right there.

Go out and borrow some more money before it’s too late.

Only $100K should get you started.

You will be rich soon…. guaranteed.

http://www.howtoprofitfromalpacas.com/Alpaca.htm

http://www.ilovealpacas.com/investment.shtml

Comment by garcap
2006-09-30 04:30:04

well, it’s more productive than flipping condos.

 
Comment by Wheatie
2006-09-30 06:22:15

Well, at least you can make a winter blanket out of the shearings to keep you warm on the streets after you have been evicted from your other bubble loss.

 
Comment by Kim
2006-09-30 06:45:56

Alpacas already had their bubble many years ago.

 
Comment by diceman
2006-09-30 08:45:21

My money is all tied up in emus.

Comment by Greenlander
2006-09-30 09:13:11

This made me laugh out loud.

 
 
Comment by Reuven
2006-09-30 11:33:16

They *are* cute!

Comment by Sol Veritas
2006-09-30 23:00:46

And tasty! =)

 
 
 
Comment by Penina
2006-09-30 04:04:20

BUBBLE ALERT - BUBBLE ALERT - BUBBLE ALERT -

The next bubble has been identified.

Many here have been wondering what, after housing, beanie babies, pet rocks, and the .com bubble, will be THE NEWEST NEXT BUBBLE.

Wonder no more.

If you’re sitting on some real estate you can’t sell and it has a yard….. perfect! You can start your new business right there.

Go out and borrow some more money before it’s too late.

Only $100K should get you started.

You will be rich soon…. guaranteed.

http://www.howtoprofitfromalpacas.com/Alpaca.htm
http://www.ilovealpacas.com/investment.shtml

Comment by Dan
2006-09-30 05:17:09

The “Llama Bubble” has come and gone in the PacNW. LOL
http://www.runutz.net/index.php/?p=8
People got into the “business”, made money by selling to each other, and the last fool was stuck with all the Llamas when the bubble burst. When demand is internally generated, it falls apart pretty fast.

Comment by Gekko
2006-09-30 05:23:11

-
In the early 1990’s, I had some “Boiler Room” salesman call me and try to get me to invest in Ostriches. He did the hard sell, but I had no problem telling him “NO” until my tongue bled.

http://www.crimes-of-persuasion.com/Crimes/Telemarketing/Outbound/Major/Investments/wacky.htm

Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 17:41:40

Ostriches make great boots and *huge* omelets. They are dumber than cockroaches and, proportionally, crap more than pelicans (The latter being a real danger if you own a convertible in coastal Florida).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-09-30 06:14:50

Can you breed alpaca and emus in the same space? And are McMansion yards big enough to breed these large animals?

Comment by nhz
2006-09-30 07:07:46

the yards are usually too small I guess, but there should be plenty of breeding room inside the McMansions. Might even help a little with the energy bills :)

 
 
 
Comment by Penina
2006-09-30 04:07:24

BUBBLE ALERT - BUBBLE ALERT - BUBBLE ALERT-

The next bubble has been identified.

Many here have been wondering what, after housing, beanie babies, pet rocks, and the .com bubble, will be THE NEWEST NEXT BUBBLE.

Wonder no more.

If you’re sitting on some real estate you can’t sell and it has a yard….. perfect! You can start your new business right there.

Go out and borrow some more money before it’s too late.

Only $100K should get you started.

You will be rich soon…. guaranteed.

http://www.howtoprofitfromalpacas.com/Alpaca.htm

http://www.ilovealpacas.com/investment.shtml

Comment by jp
2006-09-30 04:53:35

Wow, you really like alpacas!

Comment by Gekko
2006-09-30 05:25:37

yeah. was 3 posts enough?

Comment by crispy&cole
2006-09-30 06:43:57

Next bubble - alpaca posts. LOL

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Penina
2006-09-30 09:28:32

Sorry about multiples, it was no showing up for me.

 
 
Comment by waaahoo
2006-09-30 04:07:49

http://cgi.ebay.com/Charming-Victorian-Historical-2-Story-House-Corona-CA_W0QQitemZ300024894527QQihZ020QQcategoryZ12605QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

When I emailed these sellers and offered that their threat to raise the price if it didn’t sell on ebay did not make sense because if they didn’t sell at 400k it wasn’t going to sell at 420k this is the response I got back.

“ebay isn’t the place to sell a house, and we’re not really expecting any bids because we are not giving it away, and do have a reserve that, in fact, is over 420K. what the hell do you care, anyway, newbie?”

Comment by maybeown1day
2006-09-30 04:25:11

Makes you want to buy that house from such charming and logical people.

 
Comment by garcap
2006-09-30 04:40:16

you can sense that the guy is edgy about his listing. Is this a sign that we’re entering the “anger” stage of grief.

 
Comment by Happy_Renter
2006-09-30 04:41:17

$258/sf. It will be interesting to see what this actually sells for once listed on the MLS, and when. IF they are even really sellers, or just looking for a Mid-Western “millionaire next door” type to show up in his white four door boring sedan and plaid quilted winter shirt with a trunk load of cash and bestow it upon their laps.

Comment by waaahoo
2006-09-30 05:11:22

Yeah I wrote back that their house could be built for 180K which would make their .12 acre lot worth 320K by their calculations.

Comment by moqui
2006-09-30 06:42:57

I’ve owned a house in that town since 85′…I live there part time. The company my wife works for was given an old bank building for $1 so the historic district could be revitalized. They had to hire a security guard to keep the bums from sleeping/ urinating in the old drive up porte-cochere.
The armor outreach shelter down the street from this house will give the lucky buyers an ample supply of homeless neighbors.
This seller has the typical attitude spewing the typical hogwash in this city.
Enough rambling…I am going to go by there and add some salt to the wound.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by auger-inn
2006-09-30 07:29:10

Well by all means give us an update if you do! :)

 
Comment by waaahoo
2006-09-30 08:56:43

And when I suggested that their home was probably worth around 225K this was their response:

“i never embarrass myself because i don’t care what people think, especially busy-bodies like you. if you have time to pick on me, you must have a extremely boring life …… very sad. obviously, you have little knowledge of real estate prices in southern california. our property WILL sell for around $485K, and that’s a bargin. what it’s worth in the new jersey market is comparing day to night. for instance, NO WHERE in this area can you purchase anything but a mobile home for 225K. you’d be lucking out if you could get a 700 sq. ft. condo for under $300K. educate yourself before you waste anymore time sharing false information. and venture out of jersey once in a while.”

 
 
 
Comment by George C
2006-09-30 05:11:29

I live in the midwest and it is against the law here to have any savings. Most people have fixed rate mortgages, but most people live paycheck to paycheck as well. Californians will have to look to themselves to find home buyers - the midwest has been priced out of the coasts.

Comment by Gekko
2006-09-30 05:24:55

-
Probably 90% of the country live paycheck to paycheck. I don’t know how these people sleep at night.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Wheatie
2006-09-30 06:27:21

No, I think most people live paycheck to paycheck + a little more on the plastic. If you are living paycheck to paycheck, that means at least you are living within your means.

 
Comment by Gekko
2006-09-30 07:23:59

-
Agreed.

 
 
 
 
Comment by George C
2006-09-30 05:09:43

It doesn’t matter. Nobody is going to pay $400K for that house in today’s market. How he feels about it doesn’t matter. I think if he went to $340K he could move it now, or he could wait five years and sell it for $310K. Yoda says that anger leads to hate, and hate leads to pain….

Comment by Diggs
2006-09-30 05:13:41

“or he could wait five years and sell it for $310K”

Your more optimistic than I.

 
 
Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-09-30 05:14:33

Waaahooo:

Great service you are doing in terrorizing sellers and their wishing prices.

Thanks.

Comment by Robert Coté
2006-09-30 06:01:19

Have you noticed the increasing disemination of not only “our” views but the language we use? We’ll have won when “bucket of debt and box of stupid” makes it into print.

Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2006-09-30 07:10:52

Yep, I have noticed.

I sometimes post ideas here, that the media that lurk here pick up and run with.

Specifically, about a year ago, I travelled to Puerto Vallarta area and was appalled at the gringos driving up housing prices in a 3rd world country with a less than stable legal framework.

Within 60 days LA Times and others did a couple of stories on it.

The entire media lurks here when they have to do a story on housing.

Only Ben knows for sure and he isn’t telling, but I have seen enough correlation to have formed my opinion.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Robert Cote
2006-09-30 09:20:05

Sure to be a chapter in Ben’s book.

 
Comment by JA
2006-09-30 09:22:27

This IS media. New media.

My new rant at cocktail parties is that blogs are a smashing success and everyone should be reading them, with this blog as a shining example.

For the last two years people have been swallowing the old media’s garbage interviews with David Lereah and co.

When the smoke clears, this blog may have saved quite a few people a lot of money. That says a lot.

 
Comment by Reuven
2006-09-30 11:43:23

I hate the film, but some of the techniques are useful….

It would be nice to do a “Loose Change” style movie about what’s really destroying America—our negative savings rate and the housing bubble.

Of course, it’s easier for people to make up wacky conspiracy theories than to worry about things that REALLY are hurting us…so maybe some of the deceptive tools that the America-haters who made “Loose Change” can be put to good use to scare people into saving!

 
Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 17:57:56

Slightly OT, but elicited by these notes — the expose about the Florida congressman who was hitting on underage boy pages — I saw an article that some major newspaper, I think in the midwest, had the information last November but apparently held it, for obvious political reasons, and that the story was released just now, after the primaries and too late for yadda yadda. Soon enough, via blogs, that sort of manipulation is 98 percent toast, IMO. What I really like is that as much as government grows to despise the freedom of the Internet, so also does it appear to grow impotent to stop it.

 
 
 
Comment by Reuven
2006-09-30 11:39:48

While I don’t think terrorizing people is good, if someone chooses to make their business public by featuring themselves in newspaper interviews, etc, they should not be offended by unsolicited contrary opinions.

Once the bubble completely pops, I actually think that buyers looking for an existing home will avoid ones build during the bubble years because of inferior construction! In 5 years, home built in 1990-1995 may be worth more than homes build in 2000-2005.

He should sell his home now for any price he can get.

 
 
Comment by jag
2006-09-30 05:15:39

“We don’t expect to sell it on ebay because we know our scheme is nonsense but we expect nonsense will generate the type of buyer we need”

 
Comment by Gekko
2006-09-30 05:30:12

-
Somebody needs to tell these fools that it’s Sep 2006, not 2004 or 2005. Humility, not Arrogance is the order of the day for Sellers now.

Comment by jp
2006-09-30 05:38:02

Don’t bother. They’ll figure it out. Or maybe they won’t.

 
 
Comment by Recovering Homeowner
2006-09-30 05:30:23

Wow - the pictures of that house made me claustrophobic. Note to sellers - get rid of the clutter, add grass to the yards, and for Chrissake we don’t need a close-up picture of a doorknob even if it is crystal (undoubtedly from Home Depot)!

Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2006-09-30 06:14:53

Ewwww… nice kitchen. Good and dark. Looks like a fixer-upper in spots. Hold me back before I bid on this treasure.

Comment by fiat lux
2006-09-30 13:22:41

Butt-ugly kitchen, indeed. And I might have missed it, but there doesn’t appear to be a dishwasher either.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by peter m
2006-09-30 07:02:36

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemRevisionDetails&item=300024894527

“Charming Victorian Historical 2-Story House Corona CA
NEW PHOTOS ADDED! Award-Winning Queen Anne - FSBO Item number: 300024894527 ”

It’s not the home’s sales price so much as the general area it’s in. That home sits near Main st and 6th, two busy traffic streets. It is in a mixed zone usage area, half commercial /residential. Lots of shops, malls and offices abound. The home itself may be a historical charmer, but there are many such old victorians located in the older declining dwtn parts of every Scal City. Many of these old dwtn residential areas are declining(result of mass migration to the exurbs), some have been overridden with derelects, illegals, homeless,ect. A few have been gentrifying, but Old dwtn Corona is not exactly a hot gentrification zone. Have traversed along 6th st and it appears to be a bit ragged and decayed along some stretches.

 
Comment by bubbleboi
2006-09-30 07:06:23

I agree with the ebay sellers - and i’d be curious to see your email. Were you just harrassing them? wasting their time? or were you going to make a bid? If you don’t treat people with respect, how do you expect them to react?

also, i think ebay is a horrible place to sell a house.

Comment by waaahoo
2006-09-30 07:42:15

And you think that threatening potential customers with a price raise is a respectful selling tactic? what about an asking price that is double what the economic fundamentals suggest is reasonable? Is that respectful?

Here’s the email curious:

Your threat to list with an agent and raise the asking price doesn’t
make much sense. If it doesn’t sell for 400K on ebay what makes
you think it will sell for 420K afterward?

 
 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2006-09-30 07:07:53

That’s total BS. I don’t remember any reserve, which is noted right under the bid. If they have a reserve of over 420K, what the hell was the crap about buy it here because we’re going to charge 420K when we list it? I don’t think eBay would be real thrilled about their response to your query. Some people think any advertising makes sense if it is cheap - wrong. All they’re doing is raising their stress level.

 
Comment by solvingadream
2006-09-30 08:02:52

Yuck…the formica kitchen countertop is gross, not historical at all.

 
Comment by talon
2006-09-30 08:09:16

And what’s with the “increase in selling price” threat? That would be an increase in asking price, no? Selling price may turn out to be much lower…

 
Comment by michael
2006-09-30 08:18:20

That roof looks like it would make for good skiing.

Why not just send the guy a link to this blog?

 
Comment by Orlando Native
2006-09-30 08:54:58

They are just pissed they missed the boat to sell it for top dollar. If their anger leads them to ignorance, let it be. They will have to find out the hard way. This is why emotions should rarely be considered in any business transaction.

Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 18:01:24

You got it.

 
 
Comment by speedingpullet
2006-09-30 09:03:45

So….what was the point on putting it up for sale on eBay…if they ‘know’ that people ‘don’t sell houses on eBay’?
Pointless waste of time..

 
 
Comment by Arwen U.
2006-09-30 05:19:34

Northern Virginia-ites, Kristin Downey’s new article in the Washington Post should be a good read:

Keeping Tabs on the Joneses
As Prices Slump, Neighbors Strive to Find Out What’s Selling

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/29/AR2006092901386.html

Comment by Arwen U.
2006-09-30 05:20:14

Kirstin Downey, not Kristin.

 
 
Comment by Russ Winter
Comment by auger-inn
2006-09-30 06:28:17

Good one Russ! Is anyone else getting pretty g*ddamn sick and tired of watching these assh*les rip off the taxpayers? On a separate but related topic, why can’t the losers of the world who are intent on killing themselves and others around them, turn on the “pigmen” instead of the innocent (case in point the teenage girl killed in school this week)? I’m waiting for the day that it becomes so obvious to the general public what Goldman Sach’s, JP Morgan, et al., are doing to this country that the executives become the target of these madmen surfacing weekly around the country. Hell, perhaps swat members will be so disgruntled that they send in sandwiches and ammo to the gunmen instead of trying to negotiate with them. Probably have the FBI show up at my doorstep for even joking about this topic now that I think about it.

Comment by Mike Fink
2006-09-30 07:02:34

Mr Auger…

We need to speak with you.

:)

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-09-30 07:02:17

TIOs seem to provide a great tool for Pig Men engaged in systematic volatility-based fleecing of the sheep.

 
 
Comment by auger-inn
2006-09-30 05:56:56

OT, yesterday I went off on a rant and included in that piece was the assertion that the U.S. citizenry were being manipulated and managed by our “free” press. I expect that statement was met with some skepticism. Please click on this link for a timely article today with an outstanding visual on how this is being orchestrated.
http://www.bullnotbull.com/archive/stocks-5.html

Comment by diogenes
2006-09-30 06:54:23

You are exactly right. It is all controlled.
The problem is, the control is so well orchestrated that you cannot call out the mind-manipulators because they control “free speech”.
Who runs Time, Newsweek, US news, New York Times, along with the better propagandist media….Hollywood.??
If you say anything about the people, you will have the ADL (Mr. Foxman), the ACLU, B’nai Brith, Southern Poverty Law Center, etc. etc. putting your picture in all their papers and telling the world that you are a lunatic hate-monger, Hilter, fascist…..etc. etc.
I have watched this take-over for decades and have tried to carry on rational conversations with intelligent people, but found the brain-washing has been total and complete. There will be no discussion, so there will be no change.
The media cover for their buddies at Goldman Sachs, Kuhn Lieb& co., Solomon brothers, and all the Paul Wargburg buddies, ad infinitum.
I don’t think the FBI will come for you, but you might need to cry in front of the Holocaust Museum, like the former God-father, were you to say you think there is a “CONTROL” of the media and brokerage houses by a particular group of people.

Comment by Hoz
2006-09-30 07:18:27

“Bolshevism is knocking at our gates, we can’t afford to let it in…We must keep America whole and safe and unspoiled. We must keep the worker away from red literature and red ruses; we must see that his mind remains healthy.”
Al Capone
’nuff said.

 
Comment by chris in la jolla
2006-09-30 07:25:46

Which group?

 
Comment by Lex
2006-09-30 07:47:09

You’re absolutely right. I tried to speak out abut the secret control of the media — next thing you know, I was kidnapped & taken to a small seaside village. Giant white balloons would squish you if you tried to escape. A man known only as “Number 2″ kept asking me why I cancelled my subscription to Newsweek. So be warned: watch out for the white balloons.

Comment by sm_landlord
2006-09-30 08:58:02

“Who is Number 1?”
“You are Number 6.”
“I am not a number — I am a free man!”
“Bwaahahahahahahaha!”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Prisoner

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ozarkian from Saratoga, CA
2006-09-30 12:02:40

I recently watched a few of the episodes with my brother (Netflix). We were little kids when it originally came out. I remembered it much better than my brother, although he is older than me. It was mesmerizing then and is still fascinating.

 
 
Comment by waaahoo
2006-09-30 14:30:37

Have you seen the simpsons episode where they spoof the prisoner?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Jim Lippard
2006-09-30 08:13:33

Diogenes, you *are* an anti-Semitic loon. That epithet is sometimes applied too readily by the ADL, but from your post, it looks to me like it really applies.

Comment by diogenes
2006-09-30 17:56:43

Well, no,
that is another trick to imply some “racism” against Semites.
Semites include the Arabs and I don’t think I have mentioned any of them here.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by crisrose
2006-09-30 09:58:49

Wake up! You’re allowing yourself to be controlled - by focusing on the wrong scapegoats. These people aren’t Jewish - they’re a$$holes who also happen to be Jewish.

The media is owned by the same people who own the commercial banks who in turn own the Federal Reserve.

Federal Reserve answers to the Bank of England who in turn answers to the Bank for International Settlements (in ‘neutral’ Switzerland) who answers to the Vatican.

The question now is - who issues orders to the Vatican?

Or perhaps I missed the Rothschild memoirs detailing their trials in the concentration camps run by Hitler whose grandmother just happened to be a housemaid for one of the Rothschilds before giving birth out of wedlock?

Gee, I wonder who the father was?

Comment by Dan
2006-09-30 14:29:45

The only thing you left out of your analysis is a 3rd stage Guild Navigator visiting Hitler and saying “You are transparent. I see plans within plans….”

What color is the sky in your world?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by peter m
2006-09-30 21:19:40

One of my all time favorite movies,”Dune”.

 
 
Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 18:19:27

Tuned in late, don’t care to mix it up, but there seems to be an unusual amount of obfuscation going on here, unusual for Ben’s blog.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-09-30 07:09:30

Until the internet is shut down or at least censored, one cannot legitimately claim the U.S. citizenry does not play a large role in their own manipulation. Independent English language news sources such as The Economist, The Guardian, and The Asia Times are all only a google search and a click away for anyone who wants an independent perspective. But your point is taken — it is no longer possible to get independent views from the US media when the market is so heavily concentrated in the hands of a few Pig Men. And it requires awareness and effort to cultivate a broader view.

http://www.economist.com/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/
http://www.atimes.com/

 
Comment by fred hooper
2006-09-30 07:43:13

Arnold just signed a “universal preschool” bill into law in CA. Arizona has a brilliantly orchestrated proposition coming up to fund public preschool via an $.80 per pack tax on cigarettes and those nasty smokers.

The leftist teachers union mind-controllers are working down at the infant-toddler level. You will be exterminated Auger.

Comment by JA
2006-09-30 09:40:27

I appreciate the post.

Recently on NPR, I heard a news editor say that when they put a picture of the war on the cover of the magazine, newsstand sales plummet. As a business, they can’t do that. So they don’t.

IMO, it’s really a matter of American consumers looking for news as entertainment, rather than news that might make them think about hairy, complicated, grim issues.

Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 18:25:48

JA — this is, admittedly, baiting. Disclosure is that I am libertarian, so I don’t care what side of the spectrum you are from.

Why would you be listening to NPR, which is as biased as any other major media outlet? If you claim to want balanced news, what other outlets do yo listen to? If you do not listen to others, why do you not consider focusing your news hunt on the Internet, the only remaining source of truly free, unscripted news?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by jag
2006-09-30 06:03:11

Pricey digs go unsold: Hub’s new shortage: The Really Rich
By Scott Van Voorhis
http://business.bostonherald.com/businessNews/view.bg?articleid=159957

Dodgers owner Frank McCourt has dropped the price of his Brookline mansion - again - this time to $15.7 million. He put it on the market for a whopping $22 million nearly three years ago, and previously dropped it to about $18 million.

Comment by crispy&cole
2006-09-30 06:50:04

Back in 1st place!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
Comment by fred hooper
2006-09-30 08:12:17

Biltmore home sells for $11.4 million
Catherine Reagor
The Arizona Republic
Sept. 28, 2006 04:13 PM
“A 14,000-square-foot mansion in Phoenix’s Arizona Biltmore neighborhood has sold for $11.3 million, making it the second priciest home sale in the state’s history.
Scott Coles, Chairman of Phoenix-based Mortgages Ltd., paid cash for the estate that has six bedrooms and seven-and-a-half bathrooms.”
http://www.azcentral.com/business/articles/0928biz-priceyhome-ON.html

 
 
Comment by jannifl
2006-09-30 06:10:56

A grim fairy tale:
One day little piggy decided that he wanted a new car so he went to the wolf and said, “Wolfy, I want a brand new car, but I don’t have the money to pay for it.” The wolf said, “Little pig, you deserve a new car because you are a smart pig and luckily the straw house you built can now exactly pay for that car with its equity. I can refinance your loan with a lower interest rate and your house payments will be even lower, its like getting a free car of your choice.” Little piggy was very happy and went out and picked out a car he would never have been able to pay for otherwise. He was only mildly disturbed by the fact that when he pulled up to the stop lights all the other little piggy’s had new cars also. This worked so well that little piggy bought a lot of other things as well. Little piggy was very pleased with his new found success and all the things he had acquired and he decided that a bigger straw house that befits a pig of his stature was in order. So he went back to the wolf and said, “Wolf, all the other little pigs I know have new straw houses and I want one too. Wolf said, “My you are a smart little pig, because sight unseen I have figured your straw house is worth enough to give you the financial standing to buy the new house you want.” Little pig was very happy and went out and put a contract on a home he would never have been able to buy otherwise. He was only mildly disturbed by the fact that all the other little pigs were doing the same thing and he was outbid on the house he really wanted. So he put his old house up for sale, and it did not sell. He was not just a little mildly disturbed that all the other pigs were doing the same thing, in fact he was outraged.
Finally along comes chicken little, at last a real potential buyer. Chicken little said she liked piggy’s house, but that at his price there was no way she could afford piggy’s house and a car to drive.
PIggy was exasperated that chicken little could be so stupid about financial matters, so he took the time to explain to her that if she just bought a house she could be successful like him and get a lot of free stuff. Chicken little was skeptical, because she had been hit in the head once before by someone else’s nut and knocked unconscous.
So she said, “No deal piggy”. Piggy waited and waited and got more and more frantic. The wolf had called and was huffing and puffing about how time was running out and he needed to sell his little straw house soon. So he called chicken little on the phone and said, “O.K. chicken little, I will give you my new car if you buy the house”.
Chicken little thought about it and decided that did not like the kind of car that piggy and all the other pigs were driving, and if she was going to pay all that money she wanted to pick out her own car. So she told piggy that she wanted him to lower the price on his house. Piggy did not want to do this, because then he would have to pay for his car with his income and he could not afford to do that. The wolf called and said he would huff and puff and blow down both of his straw houses down he did not find a buyer soon. Piggy is now worried that now he may end up without a house at all. He is also trying to figure out how he will be able to make the payments on his car and afford rent also.
Meanwhile chicken little has been hanging out in the chicken coop co-op, the wolf has been knocking, but no one is answering the door.

Comment by chris in la jolla
2006-09-30 07:32:13

Poor little piggy! Who will save his bacon?

 
Comment by WArenter
2006-09-30 09:15:59

LOL - that is a grim tale indeed!

 
Comment by John Fontain
2006-09-30 15:54:31

Nice fable! So what happens in the end?

 
Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 18:44:31

Jan — (a) nice story and a lot of work to put it together. (b) we now can confirm that you’re female, not that it’s important.

 
 
Comment by garcap
2006-09-30 06:27:29

I was at a party last night and had an interesting conversation with an MBS salesman with a major investment bank.

I asked him about who buys the riskier mortgage paper, especially where the underlying collateral is questionable (option IOs, stated income, etc.). He said the buyers are CDOs (Collateralized Debt Obligations). A CDO is giant investment pool that buys loans (in this case MBS which are themselves sort of like CDOs!) and then issues tranches of securities with varying claims on those loans. Senior Tranches are generally safer since they have a senior claim on the underlying collateral and junior tranches absorb losses first. The riskiest paper (the most jr. tranche) is the equity tranche. I asked about who buys these tranches and he said they typically end up in Asia or Europe.

But he said that lately more hedge funds have been circling around MBS looking for short ideas (he said they have been getting a lot of inquiries from funds that his desk has not done business with before). He said one increasingly popular trade is to buy an equity tranche, which typically yields about 10% (1000 bps) more than treasuries and use that cash flow to finance a short on the senior tranche. One can buy credit protection on the senior tranches for 250 bps over treasuries, so the equity investment yielding 1000 over can finance 4 units (1000/4) of short interest on the sr. tranche. “But what if the equity tranche gets wiped out due to credit problems/defaults in the underlying collateral?”, I asked. He said that that on newer MBS, the mortgage servicer (the big bank that underwrote the deal, collects interest payments and then pays interest on the MBS) will typically service unpaid interest for a while so credit problems don’t show up for a few years at least in terms of the MBS. If after a few years, the equity tranche gets wiped out, the senior tranches will likley widen out a lot and the shorts will make money. So the bet is that your gains on buying credit protection offset the losses on the long. He finished by saying that there are some big bets like this being placed now in MBS, and that the next few years will be very interesting because the market is beginning to price in defaults on risky mortgages…

Capitalism is a beautiful thing…it doesn’t let stupidity go unpunished for very long!

Comment by txchick57
2006-09-30 06:33:30

I mentioned that yesterday w/the writing about some new derivatives to participate in this. Should be verrrry interesting.

 
Comment by garcap
2006-09-30 06:43:06

sorry, I had a typo in my post (1000/4) should read (1000/250). I missed your post on this yeast txchick…will have a look.

One more intersting note: he said that credit protection (basically insurance) on these sr. tranches is now ~250 bps over tsys. Last year it was only ~150 bps over!

 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2006-09-30 07:22:43

By buying cover on long against short, investors are saying that they can handle the credit risk associated with short maturities even though they are uncomfortable with the risk in general. People think if they are clever enough they can arbitrage away the risk. Maybe the first few players were on to something. But as more and more people play the same game, the prices of the various tranches, the cover paid for the long-dated tranches, and so forth adjust so that “extraordinary profits” are arbitraged away. TANSTAAFL.

Comment by garcap
2006-09-30 07:34:44

Not sure what you are getting at. The point is that more market participants are making generally bearish bets on MBS. Time will only tell if they are right.

Comment by Paul in Jax
2006-09-30 09:08:15

“The bet is that the gains in buying credit protection offset the losses on the longs.”

But who’s selling the credit protection? Someone who is not bearish on MBS or else feels the compensation is worth the risk. Why would they underprice this credit protection over the long term?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by garcap
2006-09-30 09:36:28

“But who’s selling the credit protection? Someone who is not bearish on MBS or else feels the compensation is worth the risk. Why would they underprice this credit protection over the long term?”

Who says it’s underpriced? People are making a BET that it’s not going to stay at +250 over time, but maybe they are wrong. I don’t think they are, but only time will tell. Someone less bearish on RE may think that +250 is too cheap for a sr. mortgage tranche…..

 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2006-09-30 11:35:40

We’re on the same page, garpan, and am enjoying the discussion. I wrote my first post before I saw your first response, but I now see by going back to your txchick response that these things have indeed been repriced (the 150 to 250) - that makes sense to me and bears out my original thinking. If more market participants are bearish long vs. short, the price of insuring the long tranches has to go up, and so it has.

But I still think sometimes investors are “too clever by half,” I believe the saying goes - my other point or thought being that perhaps people systematically underestimate credit risks in the short term relative to the long-term.

 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2006-09-30 11:37:47

Sorry, “garcap”

 
Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 18:55:00

Garcap — on behalf of those regulars, however few like me they might be, who do not understand enough of this to make sense of it, in two sentences, what does this mean for us (bear) peons?

Note to Misstrial: Garcap’s and TxChick’s exchange her is pretty much is common lingua on the board and those of us who do not comprehend mind our peace — not the same as my note about your use of conflicting terminoliogy last week. It is nice to have lawyer-types posting or lurking, for when we have lawyerly questions.

 
Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 18:56:53

It being “half-past sauce” at the moment.

 
 
 
 
Comment by mort_fin
2006-09-30 07:54:12

The part about this that I don’t understand is the servicer covering missed payments. What the heck is their incentive to do that? IF they are also the originator, and want to avoid buybacks from early payment defaults, they might do that for the first 3 or 6 months - in rare cases out to one year. But the servicer often isn’t the originator, and the first few months doesn’t buy you much time for your bet on the senior to pay off. When interest rates are falling there can be an incentive to forebear on the defaults, because you want to keep above market loans in the pool. But rates have been falling, so the defaulting loans would tend to be below market, and everyone would want to get rid of those ASAP. If servicers aren’t covering defaults this strategy would be risky as hell.

Comment by mort_fin
2006-09-30 07:57:36

“but rates have been falling” should have been “but rates have been rising.” oops. And just because this strategy would be risky as hell does not mean that wall street wouldn’t try it, I guess.

 
Comment by garcap
2006-09-30 07:58:51

I agree, but apparently that’s how some of these work. Perhaps there is a mechanism whereby the servicer accumulates a claim on the assets for interest that it has paid but has nlot received…

Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 19:00:02

When I was young, I was a servicer.

Now that I am old, I am a servicee.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by garcap
2006-09-30 08:10:18

Apparently, some servicers do this. Perhaps they build a claim against the collateral as they do…

Comment by Chrisusc
2006-09-30 10:24:09

Mort, Paul and Gar, thanks for the lesson.

However, I still dont follow you on one issue. Why would a servicer cover the interest to receive a claim on an asset declining in value? A claim that they would undoubtedly not be able to collect. The only thing I can think of is that the servicer wouldn’t want their servicer rating to drop. I know that servicers are rated by Fitch, as based on their ability to service the loan pools and collect the monthly payments. This might help the executives cash out of their stock before their ratings were lowered by Fitch, which might thus in turn lower their stock prices and/or cause other lenders not to place loan pools with them to be serviced (again lowering revenues and further declining stock price). Am I off base here?

Other than the above, I can’t fathom why a servicer would pay phantom interest out to investors for a future claim on the underlying assets of the loans being serviced.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Max
2006-09-30 16:28:29

The strategy seems very risky, and only borderline making sense - to go long on bad credit and short on good one. As previously said here, someone in this beatiful “capitalist” scheme is seriously underpricing the risk, so that such stupid arbitrage is possible.

Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 19:07:41

Garcap et al — very nice set of posts. Apologies for any interruption in train of thought via my insert of humor — you do good work.

 
Comment by ajh
2006-09-30 20:33:33

I agree.

Actually, without thinking too hard, I can find two serious risks from the layman’s perspective.

1. As has been alluded to above, I presume the major reason a mortgage servicer may choose to cover missed payments for a time is reputational. They want to continue selling tranches of new CDO’s.

Now there are a couple of scenarios where this breaks down.
Firstly, and most obviously, is if the mortgage servicer himself runs into trouble and simply can’t continue carrying the non-performing loans while they are at a level which disproportionately hits the equity tranche.
Secondly, the CDO market totally tanks. Then there is no ongoing business for the mortgage servicer to want to protect.

2. The entity issuing the credit protection refuses to, or more likely is unable to, honour their obligations when called upon to do so.

I have read that there are already some mortgage originators who are folding their tents when having their toxic loans returned. Some of this may be fraud, but some will undoubtedly be due to mispriced risk and lack of reserves.

 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2006-09-30 06:42:06
Comment by Diggs
2006-09-30 07:18:07

“top ramen taste much better when eaten from granite countertops..*five different flavors*”

hehe. gotta love it :)

Comment by Gekko
2006-09-30 07:23:33

-
I ate those ramen noodles back in college. Three different times, I found a real maggot floating in my soup. Third strike you’re out - I never ate them again.

Comment by arroyogrande
2006-09-30 08:25:58

“I found a real maggot floating in my soup.”

They usually charge extra for the ‘with maggot’ variety. You got lucky.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Gekko
2006-09-30 08:33:32

-

Great source of Protein!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casu_marzu

 
 
 
 
Comment by scdave
2006-09-30 09:14:01

Good one Chick….

 
 
Comment by Johnny Fever
2006-09-30 06:58:40

I have an off topic:
Ok, last year here in Orange Cty b/c of an unusual mix of selling, the december 2005 median dropped 39K. Now even though the median is now only 3% appreciation. It will at least theoretically jump back up to 8-10% if the media goes by that number when it dropped…then…drop back down in march 2007.
How do you think the media et al. will spin that?

 
Comment by need 2 leave ca
2006-09-30 07:12:26

I just received a refinance letter from “Home Loan Center”. They promised a $300K loan for a 1% rate and $965/mo payment. I called and asked the ‘details’. Of course, a neg am ARM. I told the guy that he and his company are criminals for selling these. I hope I gave him a guilty conscience. Next week, I will pretend I am Jethro Bodine and as intelligent as he is. Anyone else want to call these sleazebags to ”inquire’ about loans - 800-337-4179.

 
Comment by need 2 leave ca
2006-09-30 07:14:36

Thanks to some recommendations from the blog, I moved my 401K out of the stocks and into MM, since it had gained 20K in the last few months and I think due for a correction. Thanks Ben. (sending my donation today). I think we have the ’smartest’ board of any RE and finance folks out there. Ben has done an incredible job here.

Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 19:17:02

“Ben has done an incredible job here.”

In my little world, it is hard to imagine how much benefit so very many people have gotten from Ben and his work here. Hopefully, the majority of lurkers/viewers have contributed to Ben as we have. This guy devotes his life, 24/7, to his blog. He almost never gets a day off and those who just try to read all of the posts certainly will agree that it takes most of the day to do so. IMHO, people like Ben come along only once in a lifetime or so. He has already saved me a bundle an more is to come. Donations matter, a lot.

 
 
Comment by Tango in Uniform
2006-09-30 07:20:25

WOW, I have not even unleashed my Billings housing video on them, and the realtors are preemtively running scared. How many ways can you say “it’s different here” and “it’s different this time”? Check ‘em out.

Rate of Increases Slow, No Price Decline

No one defines “correction” in the article, but I think their idea is going from 15% appreciation to 5% appreciation.

Some excerpts:

———

Talk started around Billings, a couple of weeks ago, when some seventy or eighty listings, [sic] dropped their asking price, [sic] through Multiple List Services. It had been a lonog time sincde anything like that had happened in the Billings housing market. Following close upon the heels of national press about “declining” housing prices, and the predictions of some economists that 2007 will bring a five percent drop in housing prices, eyebrows were raised.

But local Realtors are quick to point out that Billings is not the rest of the nation. The declines have to do with a slowing in the rate of increases in housing prices, not an actual decline in prices.

Appreciation rates in the Billings market have been between 12 and 15 percent, three years in a row, said Dean Luptak, Coldwell Banker The Brokers. It shouldn’t be too surprising to see a five or six point correction. “Our normal appreciation is three to five percent,” said Luptak, “and that is a healthy thing.”

The price reductions seen by Multiple List were from sellers and agents that were still building-in the higher appreciation rate that they had become used to. “They were trying to do a good job for their client,” said Luptak. “But the market was no longer accepting it. The math tells you that housing needs to have a price correction for the market.”

Such market swings get exaggerated by the media, complained Luptak, “They come out with ‘the sky is falling.’”

Luptak is not alone in the observation; even nationally there are those questioning the media’s interpretation of the market fluctuations. Said one critic, “It means that the supply is adjusting to demand — an indicator that new-home prices may hold steady. Overall national home prices have, as of June 30, NOT declined. . . the answer nationally has been ’slower increases’ and NOT lower prices.

But, it is true that across the state there has been a “softening” in those things that have been pushing up housing prices. The “cooling off” has also been seen in almost every region of the country, according to data from the office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight. But that worries Luptak not at all.

Billings is absolutely bullish,” he said, “We have some serious demand coming to this town.” “Overall our houses are still appreciating, just not at the same rate they have been.” Billings is unlike other areas in the nation, said Luptak, in that it has had the “lowest priced housing west of the Mississippi,” according to the Coldwell Banker’s price comparison. “Billings housing was running the least expensive for a community of this size, until recently,” said Luptak, “When Casper and Minot slipped under us.”

. . .

“It’s cyclical,” said Nelson, “and we have had a wonderful market locally. There is some uncertainty in the business cycle. There has been a lot of speculation in a lot of the markets, including one or two markets in Montana, we have seen a tremendous amount of speculation. But, that’s common. Real estate is a good place to put your money.”

. . .

“Our experience is that Billings doesn’t necessarily mirror national trends, and it’s often on the tail end and doesn’t seem to react as strongly. I don’t think we had the price increases that they do in some of the boom areas, and maybe even in some areas in Montana. Billings has moved along at a much more steady pace.”

In their 41 years of business, Sanderson said his firm has experienced a very steady increase in business year after year, they only experienced “a big swing” in the late 80s. Things have changed since then, he said. “Our clients are much more sophisticated and savvy folks.”

. . .

Moderately priced, first time home-buyer homes, in the $100,000 to $140,000 comprised 24 percent of the market. This year so far it comprises 21 percent of the market. Two percent of all homes, on Multiple List, in 2005 were over $400,000. That has doubled to four percent this year — “that is a huge shift,” said Sumner.

The market segment of $180,000 to $250,000, usually nice housing for couples who both work, comprised 22 percent of the market last year and is 26 percent of the market this year. “An indication that prices are moving up — people have more money in Yellowstone County.”

. . .

“Our market is more balanced. There is more inventory,” said Sumner. It’s just reached a point where, “You can’t have any fluff in the price, there’s too much competition.”

Sumner, too, is high on the Billings market. “When you buy in Billings it is like getting a corporate bond. You will get a steady decent rate of return of six to ten percent. It’s real value and it will hold.”

Comment by Paul in Jax
2006-09-30 07:31:57

I have a brother-in-law who grew up in Billings and when he and my sister paid a visit last year with the idea of relocating there they quickly decided against it because of how expensive the housing was relative to Nashville. But I’m pretty sure everybody ELSE will be moving to Billings in order to get the housing/corporate bond thingie.

Comment by Tango in Uniform
2006-09-30 08:34:35

Very interesting, thank you. I can’t figure out where Coldwell Banker could get their figures to say Billings is the least expensive west of the Mississippi. They must be ignoring Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, etc. Topeka has a population and cost of living very similar to Billings, but median asking price of $120k as opposed to $185k.

The “corporate bond” quote blew me away. So far I have seen optimism from Billings realtors, but not outright irresponsibility. This one crossed the line, big time.

A friend of mine got into a house in January relying on thinking like this, and I fear for him. He planned to sell in two years. Not with a pile of cash, but he expected it to work out better than renting. So much for the Realtor(r) code of ethics.

Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 19:24:01

Tango — ditto the others’ comments re your video. It was excellent. There are very few amateur videos that I’d watch for 20 minutes and yours was well worth it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Jim Lippard
2006-09-30 08:17:54

Tango, are you the one who did the 20-min Billings housing video? You did a fantastic job, very professional. I sent it to a coworker who is preparing to relocate to Billings.

Comment by Tango in Uniform
2006-09-30 08:41:24

Yes, that’s me. Glad you enjoyed it, and I hope it helps your coworker make smart choices. It’s had 1500 views so far; thanks HBB!

Comment by speedingpullet
2006-09-30 09:15:59

Yes, Tango, it was linked in Patrick’s blog yesterday, and I enjoyed it very much.
You’re doing us all a real service by making these ‘moment in time’ pieces, I hope that others will do the same for thier areas. Good Job :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Ozarkian from Saratoga, CA
2006-09-30 09:30:14

I watched it twice…second time with my brother. We live in SW MO but your video could have described our area too (near Springfield). Especially in Republic, MO. What was really funny is the McMansions in Billings look exactly like the McMansions here!!! Absolutely no “sense of place”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Gekko
2006-09-30 07:21:05

-

Anybody watch Forbes on Fox this morning? 5/5 guests on the show said that housing prices will continue to fall. No big surprise for us but boy have we come a long way. The more big media focus on the correction, the better.

“The delusion of optimism gives way to the delusion of pessimism.” - Quentin Hardy

Comment by sm_landlord
2006-09-30 09:17:33

Yes, I saw that. The argument was over how fast and by how much.

Quite a shift, but it’s amazing how far behind the curve these guys at FOF are, at least compared to anyone who reads this blog.

I have seen this happen in other businesses that I have been involved in as well. When you’re inside of something, you can really see how far behind the MSM is when your little part of the world hits the news, and how wrong they usually get it. Over time, these experiences have led to believe that most of what you see in the MSM is off the mark and late to the party.

Of course this is observation is probably a big Duh to most folks on this blog. But I am still struck by the contrast when these things happen.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2006-09-30 07:29:29

Does anyone remember the old rule on deferring capital gain on your home sale? You had to buy another house within two years that cost at least as much as the house you sold, or you paid capital gains on the difference. This meant ever-escalating prices for everyone.

Sometime in the mid-90s the Feds changed the rule, and allowed you to keep up to $500K in gain on each house, as long as you lived in it for 2 out of the last 5 years. When that change was announced, I thought, “Well, there goes housing appreciation. Everyone can now buy lower.” Boy was I wrong. House prices continued to go up.

However, each house we bought since then was purchased at a lower price than what we sold the prior house for. Each time, the gain went into savings and investment. The house we bought most recently was priced lower than any house we’ve owned since 1983, and we own it outright. Why didn’t more people take advantage of that new tax law?

Comment by jp
2006-09-30 07:42:41

Because of a disease called consumption-itis?

 
Comment by WArenter
2006-09-30 09:29:12

You could also ask why more people didn’t take advantage of low interest rates to lock in a fixed rate mortgage.

 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2006-09-30 11:35:10

Bill , I took advantage of the new laws by buying down . I am also surprised that people didn’t do that more . Maybe people planned on doing that after they flipped 5 houses .I think alot of people bought a higher priced home because they thought they would make more appreciation on a more expensive house . The market crashing has screwed up the short and long term plans of alot of people . Goes back to people actually believing that real estate always goes up 15 to 30% a year .

 
 
Comment by arroyogrande
2006-09-30 07:55:42

The Latest from Leslie Applesauce-Young:

http://www.sanluisobispo.com/mld/sanluisobispo/15646406.htm
Biz Buzz: Slowdown in home sales may last years

“Prices aren’t falling off a cliff, but they definitely are taking a breather,’’

“I don’t see a slowdown lasting two or three months,’’ she said. “It may be a couple of years. Instead of taking orders, our industry is going to have to sell houses.’’

“Wealthy baby boomers inheriting their parents’ wealth also will continue to drive the housing market. They’re interested in real estate for their children, parents or for retirement purposes, Appleton-Young said.”

“Long-term, we can be bullish on housing in California,’’ she said.

———-

Again with the wealthy baby boomers…are there statistics showing that a lot of wealthy baby boomers are out there to support prices, or is this one of those “eveyone knows that” kind of facts, kind of like “housing prices always go up”?

Comment by solvingadream
2006-09-30 08:39:39

I believe it’s more like strapped boomers are selling their deceased parents homes quickly for market value, because heirs want their money NOW.

Welcome to the new comps….

 
Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 19:28:00

“Applesauce-Young” - LOL.

 
Comment by winjr
2006-09-30 19:57:34

““Wealthy baby boomers inheriting their parents’ wealth also will continue to drive the housing market.”

My practice over the years has morphed into an almost-exclusive estate practice. All of my clients are boomers, administering their parents’ estates. At least in my little slice of the world, Ms. Appleton-Young’s premise is absolute crap.

Comment by robin
2006-09-30 21:34:33

Please elaborate!

 
 
Comment by peter m
2006-09-30 22:46:08

“Again with the wealthy baby boomers…are there statistics showing that a lot of wealthy baby boomers are out there to support prices, or is this one of those “eveyone knows that” kind of facts, kind of like “housing prices always go up”?”

Probably not. Baby Boomers, at least in Cal, have probably been the most spendthrift, money dissipating, debt-ridden generation of all. WE(I am one) came of age in the Me-Too, get-it-while-its- good era, unlike our parents(the greatest generation)who were the great savers. The Boomers have on the whole irresponsibly splurged off and disspated the wealth bequeathed to them by their Parents. If they did come into any great sizable inheritance such as homes, they probably put these into hock thru stupid helocs, ect.
It is largely Cal Boomers who have been purchasing RE “investments” out of Cal; another example of frivolous disspation of their Parents inheritance.
I do not see a great mass of wealthy Boomers so much as “Debt-ridden boomers” riding the coattails of a RE bubble runup which will come back to bite them.

 
 
Comment by Lurkeeloo
2006-09-30 08:18:47

I think everyone here is forgetting the “boom” effect that falling gas prices are going to have on the economy. As people spend less on gas, they have more $ to cover their I/O mortgage payment.

Just look at my case: I was paying about $2.75 a gallon several months ago, then prices went up to about $3.17. I figure we were paying up to $60 a month more for a while. So doesn’t it make sense that now that prices are back to around $2.75, we’re “saving” $60 a month that could now be used for housing expenses?

Gee, I wish gas had gone up to $100/gallon for just a day or two. Then we’d be saving even more each month right now…

Comment by JWM in SD
2006-09-30 09:14:27

Bwahahahaha, are you f**king kidding me?? Go troll somewhere else…that has to be the one of the most laughable reasons for continuing the house party I’ve seen recently.

Comment by Lurkeeloo
2006-09-30 09:20:56

Yes, I was f**king kidding. Thought I was being pretty obvious; so sorry.

Comment by Ozarkian from Saratoga, CA
2006-09-30 09:27:40

It was obvious. And funny too.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by sm_landlord
2006-09-30 09:21:02

JWM,

I think your sarcasm detector needs an upgrade :-)

 
 
Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 19:31:14

Lurkeeloo — good stuff, dry as a bone.

 
Comment by Ren
2006-10-01 09:59:18

I am greatly saddened that, by driving a smaller, more gas efficient vehicle, I am saving less than people who home ATM-ed their ways into Suburbans, Expeditions and Sequoias. Man, if only I had traded up, I could be saving $20 every time I filled it!

My mother always said my tragic inability to spend money would end up costing me someday (actually, she just called me a tightwad, but I know that’s what she meant).

 
 
Comment by KingSlug
2006-09-30 09:12:30

This will give you a scope of the friends I have.

Last night I got 2 unexpected calls from a couple of friends, one a actuarian/manager for Lloyds of London and the other a property wrangler in SoCal.

First call with my buddy in London is about the usual chit chat and catching up, then we turn to finanacials. We went round and round on ideas in the America, European and world theatres and are placing our usual sidline bets. After a while he starts talking about the credit bubble (housing and debt bubble rolled into one) and starts voicing concerns on the impact to worldwide markets and his business directly. We continue to roll this one about for a while, when the conversation turns to the lack of strength in some banks. Basically if you don’t have you money in a strong bank you are screwed as my friend sees a major financial melt down ahead. After we swapped opinions, we agreed that there was no really safe harbor. It pays to have cash saving but where and how will they be diminished? Can’t say. One item he did offer, if the stock market goes down, the banks will follow; so if you see the circuit breakers pop on Wall St go to your bank and pull out your money. If you cant get all your money get as much as you can and a transfer the rest to a safe banks, apparently if the banks go on a holiday all active transactions must be served before depositors get any funds. Apparently this is part of the velocity of money these days and has to do with internal and govt banking transactions, but it could save the little guy too maybe. Problem being you must already have an account with a strong bank. I trust my friend’s guidance alot, I have know him for a lot of years (enen though we are jus tin our 30s) and he did graduate for the Chicago and London Schools of Economics.

On the flip-side I have a friend (yes he knows the one in England too) that is a property wrangler/scout for the movies and films, he has done work for the big studios and the small ones. This friend I used to rehab old houses in Los Feliz, Glendale, Melrose and other locals before we moved on to carrers, we weren’t flippers just guys that found money in restoring old homes. In a way he is like a real estate agent that rents listings. He is up late at night looking at properties sometimes and calls to annoy as I am 3 hours behind in Hawaii. So I get the call, he is going on how business in humming right along and projects and things. Then he goes off on a tangent on how he had to change his personal, business numbers and email, then hire a person to go back to all his clients and associates to give them the new info. It seems my friend has done some work for the adult film industry in the more put together productions, (not the ones were you see mismatched sheets on a couch or a matress in an otherwise empty home) but the ones where they need view looking at the beach from a top Malibu and things like that. Well some how the news got out to the general public and real estate agents that my friend rents homes to film pornos and paid big bucks for like a week or weekend of filming. Some how Joe and Jane 6pack and their real estate agents and other real estate agents start ringing my friends phone off the hook, sending faxes and MLS listings and emails with pictures. All of these people are desperated to have their homes rented by a porn company and cashing on adult entertainment. We were laughing really hard at some of the properties people were trying to pitch him. Even an old neighbor of ours (we owned/refurbished a house together before I was married, he still lives there) in SilverLake offered up his property. I asked if the homes had granite counter tops, stainless steel appliances, and the other HD fair. He said yep and they would even entertain purchase offers after filming and bonus of all bonuses the houses were currently empty. We had a big laugh as we pondered how the SoCal housing bubble was going to be saved by porn and the future of housing in LA metro.

Now these are just insights from my friends, one a straight laced actuarian and the other a “hip and happening hollywood player” both see trouble on the horizon.

Comment by fred hooper
2006-09-30 09:32:22

Did your friend in London give you any ideas on possible “triggers” of a systemic financial event other than a stock market crash (which, IMO, is a lagging indicator of a meltdown), or is that his idea of a trigger? The May mini-crash in the foreigh markets and US should have kicked off more ripples than it did, don’t you think?

Comment by kerk93
2006-09-30 09:48:24

Fred,
From your previous posts, I would assume that you already know that once the trigger is activated, it is too late. It is the “trigger”, and once pulled, it happens way too fast. The gun’s been loaded, the trigger is cocked, and there are folks who gently pulling back on that said trigger. I’ve said before that banks aren’t safe…unless we don’t think there is a housing bubble that will crash.

Comment by fred hooper
2006-09-30 10:26:32

Yes, it would obviously be too late for bank withdrawals. Such an event might kick-off other plans, including business related security precautions, emptying safe-deposit boxes, or bugging out of the big city, as crazy as that would seem at the time. See interesting posts in yesterday’s bits bucket, searchword violent. I wouldn’t be sitting on my ass wondering what to do next. Some financial events may, at first appearance, seem manageable or even benign to the uninformed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by KingSlug
2006-09-30 10:36:59

The so called “stock event” is the final burst of the bubble that will let the air out of enconomies and usher in hard times. The housing bubble only builds into the stock market burst that will be the true sign of a turning economy for the masses and cause a panic to get to shelter for the lil guy, banks, businesses, brokerages, hedgefunds… As for a systemic cause all the dominos are stacked and waiting for the futter of butterfly wings, its to hard to figure out the trigger until after it happens thanks to the global economy. I was abit surprised the recent Thai incedent didn’t have more impact. Its also hard to make prediction on when it will happen, as its like going closer to a cliff edge at 1′ you could easily fall but 3″ gives you a better chance of falling.

Has anyone heard Leonard Cohen and his song titled “Everybody Knows”? It is starting to sum up the future. Brokers are in the current stock rise because they have to make money for shareholders but they know are some under lying issues that are not resolved, mortgage houses need to make money and IOs are the only thing selling when prices are so elevated although they know their dangers, and the cop has another donut although he know its bad for him. Everybody know these things are bad but business and making a livelyhood must go on. I had an instructor in school who’s family owned a farm in Germany close to the Swiss border in WW2, he said that everyone knew something was wrong but by the time everything was spinning out of control what could be done. They (Germany) were locked into a fate fleeing from one problem to another they didn’t notice where they were or who they were when the note came due.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by fred hooper
2006-09-30 12:30:39

Enjoyed the stories from your two friends. I think you’re right, everyone knows something is wrong, but life goes on. It is odd that the Thai and Amaranth events didn’t cause any ripples. As GetStucco would say, the PPT must be hard at work. I’m out of touch with the wannabe rich and famous though, who is Leonard Cohen? Golden Oldies? I’ll look him up. Hope to learn more from your friends.

 
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2006-09-30 17:57:56

Leonard Cohen wrote (among others) the song “Hallelujah” which has featured quote a bit lately in movies and TV.

Famous examples: Shrek, The West Wing, Scrubs, Cold Case and House. Happen to love the song so I notice when it plays. But to be honest, Shrek is what introduced me to it. (Most of these were covers by other artists, but the original Cohen is good too.)

And now on to Bubble topics……

 
Comment by bubblicious
2006-09-30 18:58:51

Cohen is like the Dylan of Canada.

 
Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 19:38:11

Y’all are buyin’ this stuff? From a non-regular? As much as I puke at the word, please “share” your reasons for believing that KingSlug is not jerking your chain.

 
Comment by robin
2006-09-30 21:51:13

I believe Cohen wrote about a different, and more honorable, Suzanne.

 
 
 
 
Comment by plysat
2006-09-30 10:00:44

so uhh… what banks are “strong” in SoCal? Suggestions? :-)

 
Comment by KingSlug
2006-09-30 10:54:26

Look up Weiss Ratings. I don’t have an account, I sponged off someone else. Maybe someone on the blog can give you a freebie? I would only be looking at a A+ or A bank, or 2 banks one for daily use and one for holdings. The unfortunate thing is interest at safe banks is very low on accounts. I remember Farmers & Merchants out of Long Beach was conservative.

Oh one more thing my friend in London and I agree upon, if the stock markets burst kiss you 401K/403B, IRAs and other pensions goodbye as the government would surely fold them into SS to keep them safe.

Comment by sm_landlord
2006-09-30 11:38:11

“… if the stock markets burst kiss you 401K/403B, IRAs and other pensions goodbye as the government would surely fold them into SS to keep them safe.”

This from the same government that wants to privatize SS? I can’t see how that would be politically possible. The large fraction of the population that has these private accounts would scream bloody murder as well.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by diogenes
2006-09-30 18:36:06

Desparate times call for desparate measures.
And, you know, the Govt. is always busy trying to redistribute the wealth. Well, at least the wealth of the working and dying middle-class Americans.
So, I would find this scenerio quite possible.
Remember our leading socialist in govt. put a lockbox on safe deposit boxes and took away all the GOLD> Hard to believe? Not for me.
I actually believe we will get into “Means testing” to see if we are entitled to our SS accounts after retirement, if we have savings of our own. Additionally, I expect the “imputed income” to come back into review if you have your house paid for.
Those who did not save and pay off their debts will be claimed to have been given all the “advantages” and more money will need to go to the “disadvantaged”.

Just this past week, the ADL was lecturing at the University of South Florida in Tampa about providing for the needs of ILLEGAL ALIENS. Aren’t they a wonderful group?
Just a few days earlier the Tribune had a front page story about the COMPUTER GAP between whites and blacks. Society has an obligation to narrow the gap by providing computers to the “underpriviledged” so they aren’t left behind. When I needed a computer, I saved my money and bought one.
I wouldn’t put anything past this government. And I am sure, they will be looking at me to pay the bill.

 
 
Comment by Chip
2006-09-30 19:40:15

KingSlug - are you, perhaps, in Vermont?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Ken Best
2006-09-30 10:23:33

I saw this on
http://bubbletracking.blogspot.com

Wow, these flippers are crying.

…..

We go to Ramona today. Small rural desert town in eastern San Diego county transformed into commuter city with a commute from hell. 7 Ramona homes went on the NOD roll on 9/13 and 9/14. 7 NOD’s in a city in a couple of days is a lot. But imagine the impact on a small rural blue collar inland township.

2xx7 Dye Rd, Ramona, CA 92065 is a 13 year old 3 bed/3 bath 2,181 sqft home on 6 acres in rural Ramona. In June of ‘05, this home was purchased for $825,000. Yes, $825,000 in Ramona! Who would have thought. A year later and of course the mortgage was too much to bear and this property was listed on 6/10/06 for $750,000. By 7/28/06, the asking price was reduced to $700,000. Despite the 15% drop, despite the $125,000 haircut, the listing continues to linger on the market.

This next one is a 2,604 sqft home sitting on a 18,000 sqft, no 6 acres this time. The purchase price was $495,000 in Feb ‘04. Looks like this one fits the ‘my 2 year fixed rate has reset and now I can’t afford my house’ scenario. It also looks like this guy had the ‘real estate only goes up, I’m entertaining offers so I can get my 25% appreciation in 2 years’ mentality. The home was listed in April, yes April of this year for $669,800. And this guy stuck to the $175,000 profit goal for 4 months! He hasn’t given up yet, but he did lower his expectation to just a $100,000 profit as he lowered his asking price to $598,800 on August 30th. The NOD went out September 13th, when is he going to realize to avoid foreclosure he needs to take a $100,000 haircut, not get a $100,000 profit?

 
Comment by diceman
2006-09-30 10:23:54

Vegas inventory jumped by 250 in two days! New month, new listings? Now over 24,400 per ziprealty.

 
Comment by Wes Chester
2006-09-30 10:38:25

I just wanted to let everyone know that if they ever expect to buy in the Hamptons they had better get in sooner than later! See article below from Hamptons Cottages and Gardens Magazine.

Fall Trends
If the summer real estate market draws a particular buying crowd—couples happy to casually poke around open houses on their way to the beach—the fall season typically draws the serious buyers, the ones willing to drive out from the city. So what can buyers expect in these chillier months? A leveling-off of prices, more wiggle room for negotiation, fewer bidding wars, rising inventory and plenty of multimillion-dollar spec houses, say brokers. And perhaps, some long-awaited stabilization.

“We’ve gone into a more normal market phase,” says Paul Brennan, regional manager in Prudential Douglas Elliman’s Bridgehampton office. “There’s a lull after two years.”

That doesn’t mean that sellers won’t try to ride the last hurrah of a wild market: Brennan, whose big deals this year included a $31 million sale in Bridgehampton, predicts inventory will grow into the fall months. As for the standoff between seller and buyers—who have spent the last few months cooling their heels—the fall season will be all about “who blinks first,” he says.

If many overpriced homes are still sitting on the market, there are some fabulous pads worth their sky-high figures, notes Judi Desiderio, president of Town & Country Real Estate in East Hampton. She has the exclusive listing for a $12 million oceanfront home on Marine Boulevard in Amagansett. “There are still some excellent homes on the market,” agrees Gary DePersia of Allan Schneider/Corcoran’s East End office. DePersia has an $8.5 million listing in East Hampton that just went into a contract after only two weeks on the market.

According to Desiderio, who recently released a report on sales in the Hamptons for the first six months of 2006, the luxury market ($10 million and up) has largely been unaffected by market changes (although there is some worry about a glut of expensive spec houses, she believes). But the stock of $3 million-and-under homes “is one of the softest markets right now because those buyers are waiting to see if prices drop,” she says. “But those prices aren’t dropping.”

DePersia, whose listings include 14 homes priced at $5 million and under, notes, “Buyers are all waiting for us to hang a for-sale sign, but there isn’t going to be any sale sign.” He adds that fall buyers should get in quicker, rather than later. “The best properties will be snatched up by November,” he says.

http://www.hcandg.com/sep06/deeds.html

 
Comment by Don Beebs
2006-09-30 11:01:48

“so uhh… what banks are “strong” in SoCal? Suggestions? ”

Treasury Bills or Treasury MMF. I’m out of the market
and expect to buy at 50 cents on the dollar in two years.

db

But what do I know, I’m a chemist.

 
Comment by Lex
2006-09-30 11:28:53

“the Toughest Critics are the Smallest”

From the Sun. NYT RE section, an article about children suffering from “real estate envy” — some choice quotes:

“Children in New York are ‘as in tune with real estate as sneakers…in a lot of New York City families, it really is a topic of conversation as much as what happens on the front page.”

and from these cretins with more money than sense:

“Julie Friedman, a senior associate broker at Bellmarc, described clients who are the paents of three private-school children. They occupy ‘the very inner circle of the social life on the Upper West Side and live in a beautiful prewar condo that’s probably worth about $3 million,’
Ms. Friedman said. But the couple, professionals whose apartment lacks a separate dining room, stopped arranging play dates several years ago after holding a birthday party for the children in their apartment.
‘The kids must have been 7,’ Ms. Friedman said. ‘One of the children said, ‘Why are you eating in the living room?’
So from that day on, rather than put their children in a position where perhaps they were being judged, there were no play dates at their home.”

And from a public-school 12-year old:

“If you have a big house, people will just assume you have more money than someone with a smaller house.”

Future Clients of America for the REIC.

 
Comment by sm_landlord
2006-09-30 11:56:31

A little weekend schadenfreude from the LA Times.

Meghan Daum: Housing Party Collapses

Comment by fred hooper
2006-09-30 15:04:14

“Elsewhere in the mostly empty house, wires hung from ceilings where light fixtures had been ripped out, gaps yawned beneath kitchen counters where appliances had been removed and apparently sold and, most heartbreakingly, paintings done by the owner hung on the walls with price tags by their sides. ”

Yes, very heartbreaking, a poor artist (thief) losing his/her million dollar home.

 
 
Comment by waiting_for_the_fall
2006-09-30 11:56:54

I saw this on a website ad:
http://www.trumputoday.com/campaigns/tubanr/index.php

Trump should take his own advice and invest in a better haircut.

 
Comment by lauravella
2006-09-30 20:49:56

I have an unrelated question to ask. Does anyone else see the script on this thread jumbled together? It’s really hard to read, and was wondering if it can be fixed or not.

Comment by BanteringBear
2006-09-30 22:11:35

If you refresh your browser, that should clear it up for you.

 
Comment by CA renter
2006-09-30 22:41:40

Try refreshing it, or go back to the main page, refresh (maybe a few times) and try again. This happens to me as well, from time to time.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post