October 4, 2006

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For October 4, 2006

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

155 Comments »

Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 04:18:19

what a surprise…..

WCI expected to be significantly below its prior guidance of approximately $0.52, although the Company still expects to report positive net income.

Greater than expected Traditional Homebuilding and Tower Homebuilding defaults will also negatively affect the company’s earnings for the third quarter. Approximately 80 traditional homes valued around $48.0 million had been scheduled for delivery during the quarter but failed to close

addition, in light of increased tower defaults primarily related to a single tower located in Northwest Florida, the Company has increased its tower default reserve to anticipate that the actual year-to-date default rate of approximately 4% will continue through completion and delivery of existing towers

Additionally, the Company expects that combined tower and traditional new orders for the third quarter are expected to fall approximately 80% below the total reported in the third quarter of 2005

The decline in the value and number of traditional home new orders of approximately 60% to 65% reflects additional deterioration in sales levels during the historically slower summer sales season, as compared to the 40.5% to 43.5% year-over-year new order shortfall experienced in the second quarter

summary of all the things happened since the last call form august (anouncing, buybacks, upgrades etc)

this is how wall street works…….

http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/2006/10/what-surprise-wci-warns-again.html

Comment by mrktMaven FL
2006-10-04 04:22:18

Wow!

 
Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 04:28:48

this is the text from the upgrade in mid august after the same call i´ve heard.

WCI Communities was upgraded by JMP Securities. JMP cut their 2007 earnings estimates on WCI to a negative seventy-five cents per share. The only thing in the reasoning for their upgrade was they saw WCI as having the ability to “remain solvent”. An upgrade on the ability to remain solvent? It is “tech-bubble revisited”. The analysts are just as irresponsible in 2006 as they were in 2000

http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/2006/08/analyst-von-jmp-sec-zu-wci.html

Comment by mrktMaven FL
2006-10-04 04:34:44

Incredible! Upgraded b/c you might survive the fallout. That’s odd b/c they are the first to go negative earnings plus they are extremely exposed to FL’s market.

Comment by Bill
2006-10-04 05:04:41

This morning UBS cut WCI (now at 17.15) from neutral to reduce and reduced its target price from $17 to $12. That’s a big target price cut, almost 30%.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Bill
2006-10-04 04:44:15

However, at least one analyst issued a very timely DOWNGRADE on WCI yesterday, citing poor market conditions in Florida. The stock was only down a little yesterday, however.

Comment by P'cola Popper
2006-10-04 05:22:40

WCI cited poor sales at a condo tower community in Northwest Florida. The condo community is called The Lost Key Plantation which is located in Perdido Key near Pensacola. The tower is located on Perdido Bay which has received substantial discharge over the years from a paper mill owned by International Paper. They do have a golf course but it is not located on the Gulf nor the intercoastal. They do have a pretty nice golf course. Perdido Key has thousands of condos and plays third or fourth fiddle to other beach areas in NW Florida i.e. Destin, Pensacola Beach, Ft. Walton Beach, etc. WCI is soooo screwed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 04:30:00

and this the anouncement of a buyback in september

2006–WCI Communities, Inc. a leading builder of traditional and tower residences in highly amenitized lifestyle communities, today announced the increase of its current share repurchase authorization by three million shares to a total of five million shares. The repurchases are to be made within predetermined parameters as set by the company’s Board of Directors. At its meeting on September 7, 2006, the company’s Board of Directors approved the repurchase of an additional three million shares. Two million shares were remaining under the previous authorization, which was announced on October 31, 2005.

http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/2006/09/wci-ausser-kontrolle-out-of-control.html

Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 04:54:27

remember this was anounced with 2 mio in cash,huge debt, junkrating, possible bancruptcy in q1 2007.

read the transcript deom the call. they assume that they can close 4 towers with hundrests of units in the first quarter with a rate of 90% to meet the creditrestrictions.

this were the words from the call in august. thy have said there also that defaults are no problem. read the warning…….

i´m glad that i´m short this one

Comment by Neil
2006-10-04 05:42:10

They *need* to close 4 towers with a 90% sales rate?!?

Oh, they are so toast if I read that correctly.

Neil

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 05:50:21

at least one analyst on the call has dah doubts on this topic.

but management was optimistic because that is the way it has worked the last years. you should listen to the call.

really a classic. was one of the longest calls oalso i´ve heard so far. but worth every minute!

 
 
Comment by albrt
2006-10-04 08:54:38

Me too - WCI is my only individual HB short. All the rest is in index puts. Just bit the bullet and rolled most of them over to March.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Bill
2006-10-04 04:33:14

We know that WCI is earning subtantially less than 0.52 per share, but I am surprised that they say “not negative” as the lower limit, as this suggests that the number could be very low. Given the dire conditions in Florida, it would not be surprising to see WCI losing money (earnings

 
Comment by feepness
2006-10-04 08:45:15

I’m glad this is just WCI and the rest of the HBs are positive today.

Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 08:57:51

:-)

 
Comment by CA renter
2006-10-04 09:36:24

Yes, nice little rally on the bad news, as usual.

 
Comment by Jon
2006-10-04 10:20:04

I found that particularly amazing–as if not being the first to go bankrupt is now the definition of success.

Jon

 
 
 
Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 04:20:04

ithis are the last data before the guidelines will take an effect. maybe there was zum rush befor…..

The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, was 633.9, an increase of 11.9 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from 566.5 one week earlier. On an unadjusted basis, the Index increased 11.5 percent compared with the previous week and was down 10.9 percent compared with the same week one year earlier.

Refinance applications continue to increase as mortgage rates have declined to their lowest levels since the beginning of the year,” said Mike Fratantoni, MBA’s senior director, single family research and economics.The seasonally-adjusted Refinance Index increased by 17.5 percent to 1970.8 from 1677.5 the previous week and the Purchase Index increased by 7.6 percent to 404.6 from 375.9 one week earlier.

charts, details as always from
http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2006/10/mba-mortgage-applications-rise.html

Comment by Bill
2006-10-04 04:45:37

These data suggest something of a bounce, perhaps a dead cat bounce, in home sales in late Sept.

Comment by txchick57
2006-10-04 05:45:33

I got a buy rec yesterday on KB Home stock, under accumulation. Might pick some up if it comes back down to support.

Comment by Reuven
2006-10-04 07:44:47

I know it’s likely there may be a few little bounces in home builder stock as new lows are achieved–but wouldn’t it make more sense investing in something that may be on the upswing in these times?

(Though all I can think of is Betty Crocker stock–because cupcake-mix sales will be strong.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ok_land_lord
2006-10-04 16:17:02

I agree, putting money into stocks that have a downward momentum. You would be better off with your money in the bank. I like water stocks or companies that are associated with water. Such as Danaher.

 
 
Comment by david cee
2006-10-04 07:58:56

Wisdom from a long term holder of a Seat on the Exchange.
“The Trend is Your Friend” The reported sales of real estate form New Homes is trending down, prices are also trending down, affordability is trending down…The Wall Street robber barons will say anything and do anything to steal your money, and a buy on any HB stock at this time is pure bunk.
“When in doubt, do nothing”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by rms
2006-10-04 10:14:19

“The Wall Street robber barons will say anything and do anything to steal your money…”

Spoken like a true insider! Thanks for your honesty!!

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-10-05 00:13:25

You still haven’t learnt your lesson about catching falling homebuilders yet?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by nnvmtgbrkr
2006-10-04 06:21:00

Perhaps a slight bounce in sales, but not in price. I believe that with the drop in rates and many areas finally reducing prices enough to stimulate some moving of inventory. Our area has seen a recent flurry of sales as many sellers are finally getting that a dramatic price cut will sell their home. It’s actually nice to see because without these sales we don’t have the verification through comps that we’ve had another big drop from the top.

Comment by Darth Toll
2006-10-04 06:49:42

Exactly. More volume will mean a dramatic drop in median prices. Of course, this will lead to another round of seller price reductions as lower comps will make appraisals and re-fi’s tougher, squeezing marginal FB’s yet again. Ahhhh, the sweet smell of falling knife-catching in the morning….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by CA renter
2006-10-04 09:39:46

Yes. I’m seeing homes priced at early 2004 levels (even in neighborhoods which were strong in SD — we’ve been slow since 2004). Here’s the good part: even though they are priced at 2004 levels, they are not moving. In 2004, homes were selling in hours or days at these prices. Says to me we are at 2003 prices in many areas, and going down…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by jmf
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2006-10-04 04:41:48

A lot of potential shorts. Are we down 20-25% YOY new home sales? Still more to go, maybe 50-65% from peak to trough, IMO.

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2006-10-04 04:23:55

It seems like the MSM were MIA during homebuilder CEO stock sales.
http://tinyurl.com/mztkm

Comment by House Inspector Clouseau
2006-10-04 04:38:38

“There’s nothing wrong or illegal when a CEO sells company stock, says Todd Henderson, professor at the University of Chicago Law School. Because a vast slice of CEOs’ wealth comes from a single company, it’s prudent to sell in order to diversify, Henderson says. Other times, CEOs need to raise cash to pay for sudden personal expenses.”

Toll sold 110 Million bucks worth of stock. That’s quite the sudden expense! Tuition must be a b*tch.

These pump and dump SCAMS make my blood roil. They buyback shares to prop the price for the insider sales.

Comment by John Law
2006-10-04 06:09:47

“it’s prudent to sell in order to diversify”

I’m sure everytime toll bros. sold, this is what their lawyer told them to say if they ever got could. didn’t toll buy a house in 2005 too? what great cover for the great housing bubble hearings of 2007.

Housing CEO: yes, Senator, I sold a whole bunch of stock at the top to diversify and also finance a home purchase(or car and etc).

Senator: let me get this straight, at the very top you sold millions of dollars of stock, but you company was buying?

Housing CEO: yes sir, but I also bought a house. I was smart enough to invest some of my money in housing(or a car and etc.) so I won’t look as guilty!

Comment by albrt
2006-10-04 08:33:39

As I recall, it was not a Toll Brothers McMansion-type house either.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2006-10-04 04:27:13

Does anyone have access to referenced report by Moody’s? A good read for bubble watchers.
http://tinyurl.com/nq9wl

Comment by James Bednar
2006-10-04 04:57:09

You can purchase the report from Moody’s Economy.com.

I believe the cost is approximately $4,000. I’d love to read it, but it’s not worth $4k to me.

jb
New Jersey Real Estate Report

Comment by mrktMaven FL
2006-10-04 05:10:26

Well, just look for quotes I guess.

Comment by DC in LBV
2006-10-04 07:04:39
(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by david cee
2006-10-04 08:09:59

The outlook for prices
● Moody’s Economy.com is forecasting that 133 metropolitan areas will experience declines in home prices during the current housing slowdown.
Low point (year/ Metro area Change qtr.)
1. Danville, Ill. -18.7 2006/1st
2. Cape Coral- Fort Myers, Fla. -18.6 2007/2nd
3. Reno-Sparks, Nev. -17.2 2008/4th
4. Merced, Calif. -16.1 2009/2nd
5. Stockton, Calif. -15.7 2008/4th
6. Sarasota- Bradenton- Venice, Fla. -14.0 2007/3rd
7. Naples-Marco Island, Fla. -13.8 2007/3rd
8. Tucson -13.4 2008/2nd
9. Las Vegas- Paradise, Nev. -12.9 2009/2nd
10. Chico, Calif. -12.6 2008/2nd
31. Phoenix- Mesa-Scottsdale -9.3 2008/2nd

Comment by Chip
2006-10-04 15:48:33

David — for the Florida locations, that looks a bit optimistic to me, assuming we all agree that the low point means the bottom. I’d have it farther out by a couple of quarters, because so many stuck investors have more assets than sense and will try to ride it out. The rout will begin when the ARMs re-set and that will only begin in great numbers in mid-2007, as I understand it. These same people probably are hearing from real estate people, as I am, that “we are already at the bottom” and the stuckulators *really* want to believe that. As many have said, it is sticky on the way down, but the slope of the board is increasing, so the velocity should increase once the glue lets go. Or something nifty-sounding like that.

 
 
 
Comment by Craven Moorehead
2006-10-04 04:36:58

jmf, do you have to always have to crapflood this thread first thing in the morning? We all know you’re trying to drive traffic to your blog, but please — can you at least consolidate all of your links and quotes into a single post? And also, nearly all of the stories you link/quote were posted the previous day.

Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 05:10:50

i post almost only in the “bits bucket” and have checked the other topics if the news has been already posted.

when i have extra contend from something like wci today i think this is useful and adds value to the news today.

the story on the rippleeffect was to my knowledge not posted yesterday. this is also a summary of the most importend passages with a lot of bold to highlight the main points. i think that is also useful and makes the reading faster.

when you look at my post only a part of the links go to my blog. i refer far more often to other posts (like calculated risk, mish, charles hugh smith etc)

Comment by michael
2006-10-04 05:38:01

imf,
keep on posting!

 
 
Comment by txchick57
2006-10-04 05:44:44

I agree. It’s annoying beyond belief. I wish Ben would shitcan this guy.

 
Comment by Kim
2006-10-04 06:10:54

What’s the big deal? You don’t have to read his posts if you don’t want to.

Comment by pv tom
2006-10-04 06:22:54

jeeez txchit57, take a breath…

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2006-10-04 06:38:36

I don’t mind jmf’s posts; it’s sometimes off topic but that’s the whole point; it provides broader context of the macroenvironment; moreover, he provides us early rising east coasters essential reading material.

I agree, however, perhaps jmf could limit his posts and reposts to one or two specific headline topics and those who want to follow can respond within them. In other words, he can posts additional information within one of his two threads.

Lastly, I look at this thread as a ‘water-cooler’ area; almost anything goes including stories or links from previous posts.

 
Comment by downward_spiral
2006-10-04 09:05:48

I agree, you are spamming and it is annoying. I’ve clicked on a few of your links and it isn’t even in english. I wish there was an ignore function on this blog.

Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 09:43:19

sometimes i wish this too…. :-)

 
Comment by seattle price drop
2006-10-04 18:44:25

downward spiral, there is quite a bit of English on that blog. It’s mixed in with the German, kind of a back and forth thing.

 
 
Comment by CA renter
2006-10-04 09:44:28

Man, you guys are rough!

jmf has some GREAT posts! Many of us like to hear from our “foreign correspondents”.

Just ignore posts you don’t want to read.

Comment by Chip
2006-10-04 16:02:31

Ben’s blog has always had two characteristics that I love:
1. Politeness — all debates are kept within the bounds of heated civility;
2. Tough as nails.

In blogs where there are often lively exchanges, this seems to be a rarity.

Comment by Chip
2006-10-04 16:03:58

I should have added:

3. Daily doses of great dry wit.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2006-10-05 00:40:25

Chip,
Agree with your reasons for the great blog. I’ve been tough (and had others get tough with me), but that’s usually because someone has made an unsubstantiated claim or simply “talked foolishness”.

I’ve seen too many great posters get chased off this blog (know you’ve seen it, too), and think it’s in everyone’s best interest if we leave the toughness for challenging someone’s positions when necessary.

BTW, thank you for your consistent politeness, and for always encouraging the same in others! :)

 
 
 
 
Comment by seattle price drop
2006-10-04 18:39:07

Like your posts jmf.

And as near as I can tell, they’ve ALL been relevant!

Keep it up and thankyou.

 
 
Comment by Bill
2006-10-04 04:42:29

Home inventory (including SFH’s and condos) can be tracked on “housingtracker.net. Since we are now in October, we can get an approximation of the inventory change in September in 52 major housing markets. During September, inventory increased in 42 markets and declined in 10. The simple average accross all markets was a 2.6% increase (not weighted for size of market). The extremes were Tampa with a 22.7% monthly increase (seems to have all come last week, so may be a reporting error or correction) and Reno with a 2.5% decline. The declines were mostly in some midwest and California markets. September is, I think, not a traditional time to put homes on the market and these increases are not nearly as high as ones during summer. However, the inventory is still clearly increasing in most markets. Fairly big increases in FL, Boston, Washington DC, Washington State, Oregon and Salt Lake City.

Comment by Chip
2006-10-04 16:07:11

Bill — when I pull it up, it shows just the change for the past week, which in this case crosses a months end with all the attendant expirations and cancellations. Is there a way to get it to show the full month-to-month change? Thanks.

 
 
Comment by ohno
2006-10-04 04:48:00

Anecdotal evidence from Northern Virginia.

I live near Fairfax City in Fairfax County Virginia. Fairfax country is one of the wealthiest counties in the US.

In the last 3 months a Dodge, Mercury, and Ford dealership have closed. The Mercury was replaced by a Toyota but the rest are still empty. On this same stretch of road (4 miles) two restaurant have closed. One is a chain restaurant, Lone Star, and the other was family owned one that had been there for years.

Housing prices seem to have dropped slightly with the largest cuts in the outer suburbs and the 800k price range dropping the most. Yet that does not seem to be an indicator of what is selling. I live in a townhouse development and there is no real reason I can see why some sell at close to 05 prices while others sit, as it is not price. In another development I am watching their seems to be sales but it is if no one is checking the comps as there is a 75k spread almost on the same units.

Some of the people I have talked to have sold in two weeks at their price. Another thought he could sell and bought a house. Even after cutting the price 90k it sits as he makes double payments.

There is a lot of condos coming on the market or planned in this area plus several large planned mixed use communities. Two bedroom condos seem to match the same price as three bedroom townhouses which is not a good thing. One tower seems to have stopped at the 4th floor and seems to be stalled. The others have not broken ground with the exception of Fairfax City.

What I am hearing is how over extended people are. Usually it is the higher income professionals who are really having problems. When I say problems it is different then most. When a working class person says they are broke it means they have no money. When an upper class person tells you that it means they are having short term cash flow problems but have not touched their real assets. HELOCS are beginning to kill these people. The lifestyle is not sustainable with out an influx of equity for them

 
Comment by troyboy
2006-10-04 04:49:49

All of the bubblehead projections seem to be based on a strong economy. We now see Walmart lowering projections from 1.8% growth SSS to 1.3%. Companies layinf off at increasing rates. And WCI having an 80% reduction in net sales.

What impact do you think a slowing economy will have on an already oversupplied housing market?

 
Comment by manhattanite
2006-10-04 05:02:23

thanks, maven –
the aol article about the moody’s report was a very good read, especially the indications that “some markets may not bottom until 2009.” the one glaring piece of idiocy was the assertion that the cooling market is ‘the direct result of the fed’s raise in interest rates’. we on ben’s blog know better.

in the article’s accompanying blog, i found the following entry quite telling:

“I am a seasoned REALTOR,ASSOCIATE BROKER in New York City.
Buyers have had enough!
They are not willing to OVERPAY anymore!!!
Ive had a few buyers walk away from an accepted offer,because they are convinced prices are coming down 5 to 6%,I have another client who has seen over 22 homes and was just about to buy when they decided to wait till 2007 waiting for prices to drop.
Think about this even if you find a qualified buyer with a 20% down payment the mortgage payment is still to much for them to handle,they would need 55 to 60% of their income to make the mortgage payment,.
BUYERS ARE MAD AS HELL AND THEY ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!
What good is having a product that no one can afford to buy.it was just a matter of time,there is a saying when something reaches their peak there is only one way to go and that is DOWN!”

a genuine “network” (the movie) moment.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2006-10-04 06:46:49

Speaking of mad as hell buyers, you’ll enjoy the comments that follow this story:

http://www.azstarnet.com/dailystar/149514

Comment by mrktMaven FL
2006-10-04 07:00:51

Thanks slim! Another piece of the jigsaw puzzle: FL + AZ.

According to the article, “Judy Lowe, an executive vice president with Realty Executives of Southern Arizona, said Tucson is growing too much for such a decline to occur….I think we’re just going to have a plateau.”

Ha! Another realtor with her head in the sand.

Comment by ljaycox
2006-10-04 08:32:57

“Ha! Another realtor with her head in the sand.”

Only if she is sitting on a beach.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2006-10-04 07:03:58

According to the article, “The report projected that 133 of the nation’s 379 metropolitan areas would suffer price declines. Those metropolitan areas with declining prices account for nearly *one-half* of the value of the nation’s stock of single-family homes.”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2006-10-04 07:06:21

Slim checking in again. Here’s another story from Tucson. Big developer backing out of luxury home project:

http://www.azstarnet.com/business/149472

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2006-10-04 05:03:08

I tried to convince the youngens who read this site http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2006/10/03/census_confirms.php#comments that this was a bubble that would burst. I provided a link to the 1980s New York bubble compilation.

A couple got it, most didn’t. But they do indicate that those who are buying are getting money from Mom and Dad. Great, if the bubble doesn’t burst we’re going to have a city full of trust fund babies and no one else!

Comment by fred hooper
2006-10-04 05:55:40

I had a ‘wake-up’ revelation Monday. I am not giving concerned advice to friends and family anymore. NO ONE TAKES IT. Examples, nephew graduates from college, buys 10K Harley on credit, gets married. Brother in law that has no “money” somehow comes up with 10K to buy an old motorhome that gets 4mpg. Girlfriend buys 1/2 week (one week every other year) Hawaii timeshare for 10K. There’s 30K down the tubes. Meanwhile, I just keep accumulating PM’s on dips and living a meager lifestyle.

Comment by jp
2006-10-04 06:56:43

You jealous bitter savers make me sad.

 
Comment by wawawa
2006-10-04 07:19:08

What is PM?

I do not give advice because it is never appreciated. As far as I am concerned they can continue doing their foolish actions.

Comment by polarbare
2006-10-04 16:43:07

I presume precious metals

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Happy_Renter
2006-10-04 08:03:48

I aslo used to give people advice but I stopped doing this since nobody ever takes my advice. It used to bother me that nobody took my advice, but this does not bother me anymore. I have my life and they have theirs.

My cousin in CA was pissed off because of a $3,000 brake job at the BMW dealer. Just a few years ago this would have bothered me, but now I really do not care what people are spending on stupid cars. I have my own preferences for personal transportation, other people have theirs. Last year I did my own brake job on my Honda; cost me about $100 in parts and disc resurfacing. I purchased my Honda new five years ago, and I paid with cash.

I have my own preferences on housing, other people have theirs. I have a small 2/1 house rental, it is all that I need. Other people have McMansions and SUVs they may not afford. If they choose to finance a lifestyle then that is their choice, and it really does not bother me anymore like it used to.

I no longer talk about my investments around family. They take my silence to mean that I have lost my aSS in the stock market. They smile when they tell me “I know you have been losing your a$$ in the stock market.” On the contrary, these past few years have been my best years of wealth generation. I smile back and say nothing. What they do not know will not make them bitter.

I have learned to mind my own business. Before I was very bitterly preaching the gospel of saving and investing, now I just mind my own store. (You make less enemies this way.)

Comment by FutureVulture
2006-10-04 09:41:05

PM = precious metal

I think you guys are wise to keep your advice to yourself. I’m trying to do that too. It’s almost a no-win situation in practice.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by manhattanite
2006-10-04 05:04:43

the aol article on the moody report (repeated):

http://tinyurl.com/nq9wl

 
Comment by Arwen U.
2006-10-04 05:09:11

Prognosticators

This post is for Northern Virginians who read last weekend’s Washington Post article by the esteemed John McClain, titled “Make Way for Moderation.” His title is the senior fellow and deputy director at (our favorite) the Center for Regional Analysis at George Mason University. His new prediction? “At some point — say, next spring, when demand usually rises — prices will go up again, and in the future will likely return to the long-term average increase of 7 percent per year.”

http://tinyurl.com/z6taw for the Post article.

How good a prognosticator is he? Here are John McClain’s predictions from this January - 10 months ago all of us could see the writing on the wall and rising inventories, and he could not.

http://www.cra-gmu.org/06%20conference/Housing.pdf starting on page 28.

-2006 prices will increase 6-12%

(so far they’ve gone down 3.6% in Northern VA and we’re not done with the year)

- Sales volume will drop back to 98-100,000 transactions (2003-2004 levels).

(so far we’re at 25,000 in Greater Northern Virginia

- Days on market rising to 45-55 average

(Fairfax County is about 80)

- Areas of region with more affordable housing will continue to have 15-20% [price] increases in 2006 - like Prince Georges, Prince William, and Spotsylvania

(NOT!) Not only are we in the negative in Prince William, the foreclosures there are picking up. (And in Loudoun, and in Fairfax).

- Condos will have less price appreciation

(how about more price *de* preciation?)

His whole bent is jobs, jobs, jobs, and everyone wants to live here because of jobs. He leaves out any analysis of affordability, speculative activity, toxic loans, and oversupply from builders.

Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 05:52:00

good catch!

 
Comment by DC_Too
2006-10-04 09:14:00

Here I go again -

GMU’s Center for Regional Analysis counts among its “clients” a number of large homebuilders/real estate developers.

“He who pays the piper calls the tune.”

Comment by Chip
2006-10-04 16:44:41

Arwen — as I read the article, I was going to ask the question that DC_Too answered — who is paying this guy?

“However, buying a house is much different than buying stocks because it is not only an investment but also a home, a place to live. If you are buying a home, almost any time is a reasonable time to buy.”

Yeah, right.

“But I was misquoted! Something was deleted! I actually said, ‘almost any time is a reasonable time to buy, from the builder’s point of view.’”

 
 
 
Comment by MazNJ
2006-10-04 05:13:43

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/10/03/Dobbs.Oct4/index.html

Dobbs: Are you a casualty of the class war?

NEW YORK (CNN) — The Dow Jones Industrial Average has hit an all-time high and Wall Street firms are posting some of their best earnings ever. For the first time in our nation’s history, the Forbes list of the 400 wealthiest Americans includes only billionaires. In fact, having only a billion dollars means you’re not on the list. As a group, the Forbes 400 has a collective net worth of $1.25 trillion.

So the rich are doing well. But how about the middle class?

More Americans than ever are living in poverty, living without health care, paying more for housing and for the costs of our public education. And real wages are falling.

Real median earnings of full-time working males fell nearly 2 percent last year, according to the Census Bureau, while the real wages of working women fell by 1.3 percent. Despite that, real median household income did manage to rise slightly last year, though that small gain was the first increase in household income since 1999.

So what has been keeping our middle class afloat in the face of rapidly rising costs? American families have been living on, as well as in, their homes. More than one-third of homeowners are spending more than 30 percent of their income on the cost of housing, a level that pushes the edge of affordability. Nationwide median home values from 2000-2005 jumped 32 percent, and homeowners have been pulling equity out of their houses in order to keep up with escalating tuition bills, health care costs and energy costs.

But not everyone is so lucky. The number of Americans without health coverage rose by 1.3 million last year, up to 46.6 million, according to the Census Bureau. What’s worse, more than one in 10 American children are now uninsured. Fewer employers than ever are providing health care to their employees and those who are still lucky enough to receive employer-provided coverage are paying a much larger share: The Kaiser family foundation says the cost of family health insurance, in fact, is up 87 percent since 2000.

The same holds true at the pharmacy. Prices for the most popular brand-name prescription drugs this year rose substantially higher than the annual inflation rate, as has been the case every year this decade. The AARP concluded prices for the top 193 drugs climbed 6.3 percent over the last 12 months ending in June 2006, while inflation went up 3.8 percent. Generic drugs, however, rose 0.4 percent over that period of time.

The costs of higher education are also hurting middle-class families like never before. In this increasingly credentialed society, the total cost of tuition, fees, room and board at four-year public colleges and universities has ballooned 44 percent over the past four years. And the proportion of family income it takes to pay for college is growing for families everywhere. The biggest jump, according to the National Center for Higher Education, is in Ohio, where college costs now take 42 percent of the average family budget, up from 28 percent in the early 1990s.

Our dependency on foreign oil is also hamstringing working men and women. Gasoline prices are back on the decline (for now), but many Americans this summer were shelling out double what they used to pay to drive their cars. And gas prices now, while lower than at their peak in August, are still about 60 percent higher than in January 2001.

Perhaps one of our nation’s leading business magazines would like to create something called a Forbes or Fortune 250 Million list, which would reveal the dire financial pressures that our public policies have produced for working men and women and their families. It’s time for all of us to focus on that deep chasm we have allowed to open between the wealthiest Americans and the middle class and those who aspire to it.

Otherwise, there will be 250 million casualties in what has become nothing less than class warfare.

Comment by spike66
2006-10-04 06:00:21

I find that I agree with Dobbs on a number of issues–housing, taxes, immigration, gov’t deficits…he seems to be the only guy who speaks for those of us who still call ourselves middle class.

Comment by Reuven
2006-10-04 07:54:56

he seems to be the only guy who speaks for those of us who still call ourselves middle class.

That’s a great point! I know a lot of people who think that because they imagine the “value” of the home they’re living in to be 800K, that they’re somehow “rich”. Far from it!

People should be proud to be middle-class! Don’t pretend to be “rich” when you’re not. A granite countertop and a sub-zero ‘fridge don’t make a person “upper middle class”.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2006-10-04 06:05:06

The “public policies” are the reduction in tax rates on higher income earners. Boo-hoo, the rich are just taxed at a 35% marginal rate while I have to pay a 15% marginal rate.

Almost half of Americans don’t pay ANY income tax. Lou, you idiot, that’s why Democrats can’t win elections. Their base has no skin in the game so they don’t bother to vote. The Republicans have figured this out which is why you never see them proposing to eliminate the Earned Income Tax Credit.

Comment by chilidoggg
2006-10-04 06:51:38

And there you have it.

Collect less taxes.

Spend more money.

Everybody wins!

I wonder why other civilizations societies didn’t “figure this out” before…

Comment by Graspeer
2006-10-04 07:53:06

Roosevelt is supposed to have said

Tax, Tax

Spend, Spend

Elect, Elect

The Republicans have shortened this to

Spend, Spend

Elect, Elect.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Reuven
2006-10-04 08:06:14

Actually, they (the republicans) do tax!

If you’re a high-income salaried person, you’ll pay AMT. That means that you have NO TAX DEDUCTIONS.

The republicans give po’ folk a free ride (lucky ducks as the WSJ calls them), and the super-rich don’t pay taxes because of all the legal loopholes available to the self-employed (read the book “Perfectly Legal”.)

Basically, they buy votes from Joe Sixpack, who’s happy as heck to get a “tax refund check” every year, make sure the super-rich don’t get taxed, and tax high-income salaried folks to death.

But high-salaried individuals who are taxed under the AMT rules get screwed!

Disclaimer: I vote republican! Why? Because the stupid things they do are more easily undone. The California propositions like 86/87 or Santa Clara Measure A, backed by Democrats, are truly awful.

 
Comment by Chip
2006-10-04 16:53:05

I am, unfortunately, not in a position to be able to describe, first-hand, the effects of the AMT. Not having bought any property as purely investment/speculation for more than 20 years, I don’t know how “flipping” affects speculators these days. But one very long-faced flipper I know told me, several months ago, that he was screwed by miscalculating something about his flips versus taxes (most ended quite unsucessfully later, with his losing his deposits) — I can only guess that he was referring to a provision whereby after turning “x” number of properties in a year, you fall into an entirely different category of taxpayer, at least for those transactions.

 
 
 
Comment by huggybear
2006-10-04 07:03:01

I thought the reason Democrats haven’t been winning elections was mostly because the elections have been rigged and the Diebold electronic voting machines are there to “help” the GOP with any close races. Take a close look at the stolen presidential elections of 2000/2004 for further insight. This movie help clear thing up:

http://tinyurl.com/39hyq

Comment by josemanolo7
2006-10-04 22:47:18

huggybear, do even bother advising them. we were just discussing *this* a few posts ago, remember.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by josemanolo7
2006-10-04 22:48:03

oops. i meant *don’t bother*.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 05:15:41

the same went on with a lot of programms for “affordable housing”
the story is very long but very telling on ethics

black box deals / more “enronstyle”

The 1999 variable-rate bonds, which initially sold at an annual interest rate of 3.3 percent, were supposed to make more computers available to kids. The Illinois Finance Authority, which is based in the state capital of Springfield, paid $1.4 million in fees to the underwriter, Kansas City, Missouri-based investment bank George K. Baum & Co., and an additional $1.8 million to advisers and promoters.

The schools got almost nothing. Of the $150 million from bond proceeds, a total of $833,000, or less than 1 percent, was used for technology. The Illinois authority ended the program in 2002 and bought back the bonds to avoid having the IRS declare them as taxable.

http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/2006/10/black-box-deals-more-enronstyle.html

Comment by Reuven
2006-10-04 09:15:10

“Affordable housing” programs at this stage will just keep the bubble inflated longer! What an awful idea.

 
 
Comment by House Inspector Clouseau
2006-10-04 05:20:01

I think that Casey finally wizened up and took iamfacingforeclosure.com offline.

I don’t see it today.

I was planning on reading some of it today too :(

Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2006-10-04 05:27:40

Maybe GoDaddy foreclosed on that piece of Casey’s real estate empire, too.

Comment by House Inspector Clouseau
2006-10-04 06:20:34

Sigh. nevermind. It was just a temporary glitch.

Now I’m off to read this garbage!

 
 
 
Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 05:45:49

U.K. house prices up 1.0% in September

U.K. house prices rose 1.0% in September from August, according to the monthly survey by Halifax bank. The annual rate of house price inflation was 8.0%, its lowest rate since April. Halifax said there are signs that housing activity has reached a plateau and added that annual house price inflation is expected to moderate over the remainder of the year as higher mortgage rates and utility bills put pressure on householders’ finances.

Halifax said there are signs that housing activity has reached a plateau…. i could sweare i´ve heard this before….

Comment by CA renter
2006-10-04 10:24:11

Sad part is, the U.K. seemed like it was going down in late 2004/early 2005. Their consumer speding was down, debt was up, and they were talking about a recession. What happened after that????

 
 
Comment by John B
2006-10-04 05:52:20

You’d think WCI’s warning would lead to a general decline in homebuilders, but nope.

 
Comment by Russ Winter
Comment by fred hooper
2006-10-04 06:26:18

Are PigMen manipulating the foreclosure rate?

Russ asks “The question du jour for me, is where and how are the Boyz hiding these bad loans?”

Funny you asked this question today. Yesterday I was thinking about the extremely low foreclosure rate in Maricopa County Arizona (Phoenix Metro). I track the notices of Trustee’s Sale from the county recorder. The population of Maricopa County is 3.6 million people, yet only 1,100 notices were filed in September. The one-year average has been about 800 per month, so it is increasing, but doesn’t come close to what I would expect in a ‘distressed’ market.

Among the possibilities I’ve been contemplating:
Lenders are in full ‘work-out’ mode.
Lenders aren’t prepared to start foreclosure proceedings since they haven’t setup their REO departments.
Originators and MBS holders are busy fighting amongst themselves over repo deals.

I would be interested hearing from any industry insiders on this subject. What is going on here? Or, is it possible that most people are current on their loans?

Comment by Jim Lippard
2006-10-04 06:46:57

Just give it time. There has been a steep increase in trustee’s sales (see the graph on my blog here), but it’s just getting started.

Comment by JR
2006-10-04 07:30:56

Jim, your info is very interesting. And it clearly indicates that foreclosures are a LAGGING indicator. Based on what you have shown us, it will be a couple of years before the heavy foreclosure rates are prevelent. Thank you, JR

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by fred hooper
2006-10-04 07:42:03

Nice chart. I’d like it if Jim would go back to about 1980 and chart that too.

Other than that, Jim Lippard is a TROLL trying to drive traffic to his left-wing crap site.

 
Comment by Jim Lippard
2006-10-18 14:03:00

I’m no troll, Fred. I am “left-wing” on social issues, but not on economic issues–libertarian would probably be the most accurate adjective, though I’m not dogmatic about it.

 
 
 
Comment by Russ Winter
2006-10-04 07:31:22

The following blog on vacant units in Phoenix seems intuitively correct, and if so, how are these folks supporting big negative cash flows? More Ponzi loans from some where? And who would give a loan to an owner with an empty house?
http://housingdoom.com/2006/09/27/

 
Comment by Chip
2006-10-04 17:20:22

Fred — are you tracking NODs (Notice of Default) there? If not, why not, out of curiosity? I would think that NODs could prompt some sort of mealy-mouth interim compromising before the foreclosure/treuste’s sale process begins, given that by now even lenders must be clued in to the large amount of snow accumulated very high up the mountain.

 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-10-05 00:17:25

Maybe the bailout we recently contemplated here will never see the light of the MSM…

 
 
 
Comment by eastcoaster
2006-10-04 05:54:21

If 30 percent of all jobs created since 2001 came as a result of a housing industry that now looks set to collapse, and two thirds of the U.S. economy is dependant on consumer spending—which is largely dependant on rising house prices, which are decelerating—perhaps you can see why the Trumpet has been warning readers to prepare to reduce their standard of living. If housing goes down, the rest of the economy could quickly follow.

http://www.thetrumpet.com/index.php?page=article&id=2587

Comment by Jay_Huhman
2006-10-04 06:12:28

Except in WW2 and maybe Korea War days, when wasn’t about 67% of the US economy dependent on consumer spending?

Comment by eastcoaster
2006-10-04 08:22:18

Granted, but historically consumer spending wasn’t so largely dependent on the housing ATM.

 
 
 
Comment by CarsonCityNV
2006-10-04 06:01:34

11% drop in selling price already and this is just the begginning.

“Fewer Carson City homes sold in August than a year ago, according to a database for Realtor sales. The data also shows houses are spending more time on the market and costing 11 percent less than a year ago.

The median cost of a single-family home in August was $309,000, compared to $348,500 the previous year. Real estate agents call this a buyer’s market.”

“It’s a good time to buy,” said Doug Eisner. “I don’t think it’s ever a bad time to buy.”

http://www.nevadaappeal.com/article/20061003/NEWS/110030074

Comment by f
2006-10-04 06:33:38

“never a bad time to buy” - wow, that will come back to bite

 
Comment by pv tom
2006-10-04 06:58:09

Carson,

What’s your take on Genoa? Drove through on my way to Tahoe. Absolutley beutiful!

Comment by BanteringBear
2006-10-04 10:16:11

I grew up in Reno and played a lot of golf out in Genoa. It is most certainly beautiful but grotesquely overpriced. I would be surprised to not see 30-40 percent price drops.

 
Comment by CarsonCityNV
2006-10-04 17:40:17

Very nice. Developers have really gone to work there in the last few years. New homes, golf courses. If they try hard enough they will make it just like anywhere else - then move on to their next victim. Its very rural but they benefit from being in Douglas County which collects taxes from the casinos in south Lake Tahoe. Happens to be the site of the oldest bar in Nevada… they say.

 
 
Comment by crispy&cole
2006-10-04 07:12:41

11% down - I guess “its never a bad time to lose money”!

 
 
Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 06:05:26

U.S. SEPT. ISM SERVICES BELOW CONSENSUS 56.2%
U.S. SEPT. ISM SERVICES 52.9% VS 57.0% IN AUG.
U.S. SEPT. ISM SERVICES PRICES 56.7% VS 72.4% IN AUG.
U.S SEPT. ISM SERVICES NEW ORDERS 57.2% VS 52.1% IN AUG.

plus
U.S. AUG. FACTORY ORDERS EX-TRANSPORTATION DOWN 0.7%

Comment by ajh
2006-10-04 06:19:34

52.9? That’s indeed quite a long way below consensus.

 
 
Comment by mina
2006-10-04 06:13:02

BAILOUT?? Here it is:
“Meanwhile, several banking sources have reported that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulsen, the former head of Goldman Sachs, may be cooking up a scheme to try to save the banks and their financial books. According to these sources, Treasury, along with the Fed, is trying to come up with a Federally funded mechanism that would take the explosive short-term and ARM debt off the books of lenders, and reissue it at longer-term debt…”

from here, sorry if repost:
http://www.financialexpress-bd.com/index3.asp?cnd=10/4/2006&section_id=11&newsid=39760&spcl=yes

Mina

Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2006-10-04 06:25:30

From that article:
“the world’s leading economist, Lyndon LaRouche…” Eh?!!?!

Comment by mina
2006-10-04 06:28:33

yeah I wasn’t so sure about that either, but thought it worthwhile to post in case there is other information that might back it up.

mina

 
 
Comment by ajh
2006-10-04 06:26:28

I’m not saying this is impossible, but I mistrust any article quoting “the world’s leading economist, Lyndon LaRouche”.

Comment by Jim Lippard
2006-10-04 06:50:26

LaRouchies have been posting in the comments here for a week or two now.

Comment by mina
2006-10-04 08:37:04

well I’m not one I don’t really even know who he is. then again I don’t know who a lot of these “financial experts” are they get quoted all the time.

I actually pulled the link from Yahoo this morning. I have a permanent search for all articles with “housing bubble” on my personal portal. that link came up this morning.

M.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Mikhail
2006-10-04 06:22:53

There has been a lot of concern over the growing use of “exotic” mortgages lately, but I wonder if these mortgages are really so terrible. What other alternative are people with average incomes going to use for purchasing a home? Home prices are SO high in the US that it is nigh impossible for the majority of buyers to afford them if they don’t resort to some form of exotic mortgage. Are we just supposed to tell people not to buy homes? Further, these new mortgage instruments really aren’t so bad so long as there is constant appreciation. Even if there is one flat year, that wouldn’t be so bad for an exotic mortgage holder.

As long as they can get 5% to7% average appreciation over 3 or 4 years they can sell out and easily cover what they owe before a reset breaks them. And judging by real-estate prices in the last 10 years, a 5% average appreciation is not unreasonable to assume.

If we stop making these exotic loans available, maybe we will just wind up leaving most Americans permanently frozen out of the real-estate market.

Comment by ajh
2006-10-04 06:37:33

Lets try a reductio ad absurdam here.

Under your assumptions, why should any adult US citizen do ANYTHING except invest as much as they are capable of borrowing in Real Estate, and keep pyramiding their appreciation?

Comment by Hoz
2006-10-04 07:00:12

I assumed that Mikhail was being sarcastic.

 
 
Comment by manhattanite
2006-10-04 06:39:07

mikhail,
ever hear of russian roulette? these loans are like russian roulette.

only difference is, there’s 5 rounds LOADED and only one EMPTY chamber.

 
Comment by jp
2006-10-04 06:45:13

As long as they can get 5% to7% average appreciation over 3 or 4 years they can sell out

The problem arises when they can’t get that appreciation, of course.

Resets occur, houses need to sell, prices drop. More resets occur, and the cycle repeats.

Is this what you meant?

 
Comment by MazNJ
2006-10-04 06:54:42

There has been a lot of concern over the growing use of “exotic” mortgages lately, but I wonder if these mortgages are really so terrible. What other alternative are people with average incomes going to use for purchasing a home?
Response: If suddenly oranges shot up to $1,000,000 a bushel, would I suggest people employ financing so they get their daily vitamin C? No, I’d suggest tangerines or something. Renting is an option. That or save up enough dough that you can buy with little or no mortgage. Heck, if you saved up the traditional 20 percent, affordability and exotic mortgages might become a non-issue.

As long as they can get 5% to7% average appreciation over 3 or 4 years they can sell out and easily cover what they owe before a reset breaks them. And judging by real-estate prices in the last 10 years, a 5% average appreciation is not unreasonable to assume.
Response: However, looking over the history of real estate, this is NOT a reasonable assumption. Unless we’re expecting 5 to 7 percent inflation or higher, housing should appreciate “roughly” in line with wages and to an extent population growth. Having flown over the country a few times, I don’t believe “running out of land” really matters as much as wages - if the world consists of 1 person and 1 house and some extraterestrial holds the deed and that 1 person generates 10,000 units of wealth per year, that person can afford some amount less than 10,000 units of wealth per year in rent. Any more, and he’s homeless. In which case, the place doesn’t rent, the yield drops dramatically, and eventually ET recognizes that he cannot rent it out successfully, is loosing money (at least in opportunity cost), and will lower the rent until the point where the cost of rent is outweighed by the cost of homelesses. Now add in about 6 billion people, etc, add the opportunity for people to double up or more in houses, etc, and you have the world.

 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2006-10-04 07:00:11

Don’t you think its absurb to put people on loans they can’t afford just so they can have ownership . The idea that appreciation will save your ass on a home you can’t afford is a faulty one . So much of the demand for housing was speculation or fear buying which is faulty and not stable ,yet it increased home prices, further pricing out first time home buyers .
Prices went much higher than normal 5% inflation appreciation because of a mania ,therefore it has to correct and than maybe prices will continue to go up at inflation rates as you suggest .
The idea that you buy a home to sell it out is also a faulty one especially if it isn’t at the beginning of a appreciation mania cycle like the one that began in 1999.The question right now is, “How much are the prices going to go down ?”

 
Comment by seattle price drop
2006-10-04 19:26:57

Mikhail-

There is a fundamental flaw in your thinking:

You assume that, because home prices are high, people are “priced out of the market” without access to these funky loans. So we must keep the toxic loans so everybody can “afford” a home, even if only until they default on the loan.

Here is the other way to think about:

Without these funky loans, the price of homes would come back in line with what people can actually afford, based on their incomes.

Sounds a bit healthier than our present situation, no?

For housing to come back into line with salaries, it will have to crash. Happens all the time in every crap-shoot market, which is what housing has become in the US in the past 10 years.

Such a shame to do that with something people actually NEED.

People who bought at the top will get slaughtered. Happens every time the crap shoot’s over.

It would have been better if tightened lending had happened 5/4/ 3/2 years ago. It would have been BEST if these toxic loans had never proliferated at all .

But since that is not what happened, there’s no time like the present. Because with every passing month more people get sucked in using those crazy loans and the more people that get sucked in the more the pain multiplies.

Get it?

Toxic loans = Inflated home prices. Inflated home prices = a lot of suffering for a lot of people, sooner or later.

Sane lending = sane home prices (eg. in line with peoples’ incomes). Sane home prices = happy, productive people looking forward to a future that makes sense.

Or something like that.

Comment by CA renter
2006-10-05 01:04:14

Seattle PD,
Amen!

 
 
 
Comment by susanmenchey
2006-10-04 06:50:16

hasn’t it occurred to you that the reason for the obscene home prices is the machinations of the userers who are offering these exotic mortages ? as for the possibility that home appreciation will somehow letpeople grow their way out of debt, how will that happen when the RE market reverts to the mean-which it always does.

 
Comment by chilidoggg
2006-10-04 06:57:34

What are you guys looking for to see some evidence of real credit tightening? Those new guidelines don’t amount to squat (according to NHZ) When do you expect to see it?

Comment by chilidoggg
2006-10-04 07:07:49

I guess there’s that new IRS tool to verify income on mortgage applications. But that seems to be more of a “don’t ask don’t tell” deal, no one’s forcing the lender to check.

 
Comment by lalaland
2006-10-04 11:31:09

“What are you guys looking for to see some evidence of real credit tightening?”

Here’s a simple test you can perform to answer your own question: Go down to a federally mandated lending institution (i.e., bank), tell them you make $70K a year, have no down payment saved, but would like to buy a $700K house using an Option Payment ARM. See what kind of answer they give you.

Don’t have time? Well then, you’re going to have to wait until such actual scenarios with real GFs play out in real time. The new guidelines were issued and are immediately valid as of 9/29/06. It will take a bit of time for banks to understand what hit them (in other words, confused loan officers may begin to process mortgages that will have to be rejected by higher-ups, or even by federal regulators). How long until potential GFs learn that the mortgages they could have qualified for as of 9/28/06 are no longer available through B of A, Wells Fargo, WaMu, etc., and in large enough numbers to affect the market? I’d give it a few months at least.

The really stubborn/suicidal GFs will then hit up the state-regulated mortgage brokers for toxic loans. That will work until the state regulators step in.

 
 
Comment by Andy
2006-10-04 07:11:51

Well, here’s one for everybody that says whitebread houses in South Jersey and middle American are safe from a price collapse. Typical run up I’ve seen even with my little Cape Cod, $100k bid up to $200k in 5 years = Bubble.

http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061001/NEWS01/610010329/1006

 
Comment by Hoz
2006-10-04 07:11:54

I apologize if this was posted yesterday -
RE: The New York Times and Chicago Tribune article
Burden of Rising Housing Costs is a Burden for the Dollar
…Thankfully the drop in oil prices has made things a lot easier for the average consumer and could keep them spending for a bit longer, but if the housing market continues to worsen, the only solution may be for the Federal Reserve to step in and lower interest rates. By doing so, they would reduce the rates at which these adjustable rate mortgages are reset to, which would help to reduce some of the housing market costs. The Fed is not quite ready to take that step at the moment because the extent of the downturn in the housing market is still relatively shallow they are still waiting on evidence of a significant impact on consumer spending. Next week, we are expecting the September retail sales report. For those hoping for a rate cut, a weak number may be the first indication of that possibility.
http://tinyurl.com/efgpp

Rate Cut Negative for the Dollar

Interest rate cuts are good for the consumer because it reduces mortgage rates and credit card payments but at the same time, it can be very negative for the US dollar. For those watching the currency markets, trading has been extraordinarily quiet. Everyone is sitting on the sidelines waiting to jump into the next big trade. The Federal Reserve has kept interest rates on hold since August and recent economic data has warranted no further changes to interest rates for the time being. However, if consumers can no longer carry the burden of the rising housing costs, then the Federal Reserve may need to cut interest rates. One reduction is usually followed by more and in a world where money shifts from country to country in seek of high and growing yield, a rate cut by the Federal Reserve could lead to a mass exodus out of US dollars. This could come to the benefit of currencies such as the Euro, British pound and Japanese Yen. Realistically though, we do not expect the Federal Reserve to sweep in and save day until next year.

Comment by nhz
2006-10-04 07:30:10

rate cuts negative for dollar? no sign of it; US Treasury rates have been declining big time lately and the euro keeps weakening. I’m sure that whatever amount of money Ben Bernanke is dropping from his helicopters, the ECB can do the same and make sure the euro declines at least as fast as the mighty dollar.

 
Comment by P'cola Popper
2006-10-04 07:32:04

The ten year yield is coming down fast today. If it keeps dropping what are the chances of a good percentage of ARM buyers refinancing into 30 year mortgages.

http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates/index.html

 
 
Comment by crispy&cole
2006-10-04 07:16:05

Front page of today’s Bakersfield Californian:

The housing slump - Prices may decline in the US but not here. The story says, HOWEVER, they write the YOY median is DOWN 2.5%?!?!?!?

 
Comment by arroyogrande
2006-10-04 07:24:34

Forbes has an online article titled “What will your house be worth in 2016″:

http://money.aol.com/forbes/realestate/2016

For LA, a 23% increase in 10 years…not great, but at least the dip is very shallow, look at the graph:

http://tinyurl.com/ozwmf

Looks like we need not worry, we’ve hit a permanently high plateau in Los Angeles, eh?

And places like Seattle? Well, we all know that “real estate only goes up”, and “everyone wants to live there”:

http://tinyurl.com/rwped

And San Diego? Narry a dip:

http://tinyurl.com/lzpgv

Well, we can all stop worrying, and get back to spending. Where’s my credit card…

Comment by seattle price drop
2006-10-04 19:41:44

Forbes is so whipped.

Last August, before the slowdown was apparent here, they listed Seattle as “America’s Most Overpriced City” and predicted 40% off I believe.

Now that the slowdown’s actually happening, we’re going to the moon.

Really makes you wonder who these guys are working for.

And why they even bother.

 
 
Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 07:40:55

has onybody seens gm

tanking 1,5$ in a minute with huge volume

Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 07:50:38

GM ALLIANCE TALKS WITH NISSAN-RENAULT TERMINATED

do the math

after it leaked gm was in the mid 20…….

what a big drop to 32,50$……

 
 
Comment by looking4mee
 
Comment by susanmenchey
2006-10-04 09:29:35

as far as the controversy berween txchik57 and jmf is concerned I enjoy all of their posts !

 
Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 09:32:34

BERNANKE: HOUSING MARKET SUPPORTED BY GOOD FUNDAMENTALS
BERNANKE:’SUBSTANTIAL CORRECTION’ UNDERWAY IN HOUSING SECTOR
BERNANKE: HOME BUILD DROP TO CUT H2 GDP BY 1 PERCENTAGE PT

this was the man that couldn´t see any bubble less than 12 month ago…..

Comment by jmf
2006-10-04 09:50:22

bernanke today and yesterday / flip flopping
bernanke today/heute

Bernanke: Housing sector weakness a major drag on economy

There is a “substantial correction” underway in the housing sector that is slowing the entire economy, said Fed chief Ben Bernanke on Wednesday. “I think I would estimate that slowing housing construction will probably take about a percentage point off growth in the second half of the year and probably something going into next year as well,” Bernanke said.

It was “difficult to tell” how long the slump in construction would last, he said, because of buyers and sellers have moved to the sidelines. There are “some strong fundamental underpinnings” for the housing market including continued low mortgage rates.

The Fed is watching carefully to see whether the housing weakness spills over into other sectors. “To this point, other parts of the economy are remaining relatively strong,” he said. Bernanke said the Fed remains concerned about inflation, but said it should continue to slow gradually

bernanke im oktober 2005

Fed Nominee Has Said ‘Cooling’ Won’t Hurt
http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/2006/09/bernanke-theres-no-housing-bubble-to.html

Ben S. Bernanke does not think the national housing boom is a bubble that is about to burst, he indicated to Congress last week, just a few days before President Bush nominated him to become the next chairman of the Federal Reserve.U.S. house prices have risen by nearly 25 percent over the past two years, noted Bernanke, currently chairman of the president’s Council of Economic Advisers, in testimony to Congress’s Joint Economic Committee.

But these increases, he said, “largely reflect strong economic fundamentals,” such as strong growth in jobs, incomes and the number of new households.and that he believes the economy could weather a housing slowdown.”House prices are unlikely to continue rising at current rates,” said Bernanke, who served on the Fed board from 2002 until June. However, he added, “a moderate cooling in the housing market, should one occur, would not be inconsistent with the economy continuing to grow at or near its potential next year.”

to be continued……..

 
 
Comment by Reuven
2006-10-04 14:15:24

Here’s one take on how to sell a house, fast, in today’s market:

http://www.angryfrozenhead.com/articles/October2006/sellfast.html

Comment by CA renter
2006-10-05 01:09:58

Good one! :)

 
 
Comment by Chip
2006-10-04 15:40:26

Just returned from a short trip, so the following may have been posted already today. In the Orlando Sentinel Business section, the bolg asks if there is a housing bubble. They’ve been duking it out and Ben’s blog was a reference for opinionated but clueless, of which there seemed to be plenty.

Comment by Chip
2006-10-04 15:41:18

Ahhh… it’s sooo helpful to post the link:

http://tinyurl.com/n5mfu

 
 
Comment by fred hooper
2006-10-04 16:50:34

Some good big-picture stuff here:

AMERICA… PLEASE KEEP SPENDING
by Joe Average
(aka William R. Swagell)
October 4, 2006
http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/2006/1004.html

 
Comment by Chip
2006-10-04 20:46:56

OT, but hopefully Bits Bucket-OK — this quoting Google founder(s) in a MyWay article today:

“Writing in the Sun tabloid, the Google boss said the online world has empowered ordinary people with the ability to challenge governments, the media and business.

“It has broken down the barriers that exist between people and information, effectively democratizing access to human knowledge,” Schmidt wrote.

“This has made us much more powerful as individuals.”

On the one hand, this is wonderful — one of the greatest achievements in my lifetime. On the other, think about government, Leviathin — it is about the collection of power. Power likes shadow, not sunlight (not wishing to be too hammy with the phrasing). Washington power will despise the uncontrolled ability of the plebes not only to question their actions, but to be able to do so in such a totally public way. So, change is coming. But it will be for your security.

Comment by CA renter
2006-10-05 01:15:56

Totally agree, Chip. I’m actually surprised we (the plebs) have been allowed to contine as long as we have.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post