October 11, 2006

A ‘Slow-Moving Train Wreck’ In California

From the Voice of San Diego. “Sales in September for detached resale homes were down 16.2 percent from August and 33 percent from last September throughout the county, according to Robert Brown, an economist at the University of California, San Marcos. For attached homes, such as condos and townhomes, sales rates were down about 23 percent from August.”

The Union Tribune. “San Diego County home prices dropped last month by nearly 4.5 percent, double the rate in August and the biggest year-over-year decline since 1993, DataQuick Information Systems reported. The $476,000 overall median was down $6,000 from August and off $22,000 from September last year, the biggest year-over-year dollar reduction DataQuick has reported since it began keeping local records in 1988.”

“The latest overall figure represents a drop of $42,000 or 8.1 percent below the all-time peak of $518,000 reached just 11 months ago. With housing back to its early-2005 levels, many sellers who bought since then will be lucky to get what they paid for their property at the peak of the five-year buying boom.”

“Meanwhile, sales continued their two-year slide with the total off by more than 35 percent to 3,207 transactions, the biggest year-over-year downturn since 1991. It was the 27th consecutive decline for the category on a year-over-year basis.”

“Charles Jolly, president of the San Diego Association of Realtors, interpreted the news as further indication that home buyers are in the driver’s seat. ‘I’m working with buyers now and they’re making offers,’ Jolly said. ‘They’re negotiating for the first time in six years.’”

The North County Times. “For the second straight month, local single-family home values failed to appreciate in September when compared with a year earlier, and home sales plummeted 34 percent from the same month in 2005, according to a new report compiled for the North San Diego County Association of Realtors.”

“The total amount of dollars changing hands in the single-family market fell almost as much, by 32 percent, from $721.8 million in September 2005 to $494.4 million last month, the report showed.”

“The condominium market didn’t fare much better. Both the number of sales and the dollar volume plunged 36 percent year over year, the North County Realtors group reported.”

“In another signal of trouble ahead for the market, foreclosures countywide have reached 127 for the year to date, 10 times the number for all of 2005, Carlsbad real estate agent Dennis Smith said.”

“‘I don’t foresee an avalanche,’ he said. ‘I do foresee an increase in those numbers because we are not seeing an increase in value to make up for the poor decisions of some buyers to purchase with the loans that they used.’”

“He said he was referring to families with interest-only adjustable loans and approaching balloon payments who were counting on refinancing into fixed loans. ‘So, is the bubble bursting? No. Is there a little air coming out of it? Yes,’ Smith said.”

The Fresno Bee. “Steven Cochrane, senior managing director at Moody’s Economy.com., said that Fresno’s prices simply climbed too much, too fast. ‘There was a lot of speculative money coming into the housing market. That was the case throughout the Central Valley … Fresno, Visalia, up to Sacramento,’ he said. Out-of-town buyers, mostly from the Bay Area, bargain-shopped in the central San Joaquin Valley, pushed prices up and now are leaving, he said.”

“The market is correcting itself and prices are falling, he said. ‘You can apply that word ‘burst’ or ‘crash,’ he said, because of the double-digit drop that is predicted. ‘There are two things going on [in Fresno],’ he said. ‘One is that there is an oversupply of houses, and demand is down.’”

“Joan Jolly, president of the Fresno Association of Realtors, said there is a current problem with surplus inventory and not enough buyers. ‘The bubble is deflating. The air is coming out of the bubble, but it hasn’t popped,’ she said.”

“Robert Kleinhenz, deputy chief economist at the California Association of Realtors, said predicting what will happen in the housing market in the next few years is tricky.”

“‘This is a market different than anything we have seen before,’ he said. ‘A downturn in housing usually signifies the economy will be slowing down in the future.’ ‘But, we didn’t see that. … We are in unchartered territory.’”

The LA Times. “Economist Christopher Thornberg of Beacon Economics described the residential real estate market as ‘a slow-moving train wreck. We don’t know how bad it’s going to be,’ he said.”




RSS feed | Trackback URI

246 Comments »

Comment by Ben Jones
2006-10-11 13:30:41

‘Thanks to a 19 percent increase in foreclosure activity, California leapfrogged past Texas and Florida to report the most new foreclosure filings of any state in September. The state documented 14,806 properties entering some stage of foreclosure, nearly three times the number reported in September 2005 and a foreclosure rate of one new foreclosure filing for every 825 households — 1.3 times the national average. The state’s foreclosure activity has risen more than 40 percent over the last two months.’

‘A California real estate salesman faces life in prison after he pleaded guilty Monday to drug trafficking. Medina’s lawyer, Kenneth Stover of Reno, asked for lower bail so his client could return to California and take care of his real estate business. ‘Prior to bringing the drugs up, he was a real estate agent. He just married. His business has collapsed,’ Stover said.’

‘U.S. new home prices will fall this year for the first time since the 1991 recession as a glut of properties for sale forces builders to offer discounts, the National Association of Realtors said.’

Comment by crispy&cole
2006-10-11 13:48:38

“His business has collapsed”

__________________________________________

One down 10,000 more to go!

Comment by zovall
2006-10-11 14:03:31

Well given that “The total amount of dollars changing hands in the single-family market fell almost as much, by 32 percent, from $721.8 million in September 2005 to $494.4 million last month, the report showed.” a lot more RE brokers/agents will see their business collapse as well!

 
 
Comment by happy renter
2006-10-11 13:49:01

Cocaine trafficing real estate agents, a real estate crash, a miami vice movie? Do you think deck shoes will come back into style?

Comment by crispy&cole
2006-10-11 14:03:53

I think I might have some pastel leisure suits!

Comment by OlBubba
2006-10-11 18:05:51

Having them is one thing. Fitting into them is another. Everyone knows that suits shrink when you leave them in the closet for a couple of years.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Walker
2006-10-11 14:22:00

Do you think deck shoes will come back into style?

What do you mean? When did they go out of style? I wear them every day.

In fact, for twelve years I bought the same style of Dexter Navigators every 18 months. But then they moved to China and their quality took a hit (went from lasting 18 months to 3), so I switch to Dunhams. Considering how long the Dunhams last, I should have switched long ago.

Comment by happy renter
2006-10-11 14:30:56

Do you wear them with socks?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by M.B.A.
2006-10-11 14:36:32

never

 
2006-10-11 14:36:46

and roll your pants legs up tight around your ankles?

 
Comment by ockurt
2006-10-11 14:37:07

Black dress socks with Dolphin shorts.

 
Comment by M.B.A.
2006-10-11 14:51:05

LOL

 
Comment by happy renter
2006-10-11 14:56:17

I’ve always wanted the T-shirt under the suit to come back in style as it would reduce my dry cleaning.

 
Comment by Anachronist
2006-10-11 15:54:57

Its stylish here in Hollywood

 
 
Comment by M.B.A.
2006-10-11 14:36:01

I am with you! They are always good!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by TRich
2006-10-11 15:17:44

Places like Urban Outfitters (appealing to the ironic crowd) started selling deck shoes again last time I was there, which was a while ago.

I was ahead of the curve when I bought some Jeff Spicoli slip-on checkered Vans back in 2000. Come around 2004-2005 and they were for sale all over the place.

I’ll have to admit though, I never saw the deck shoes for sale in Urban Outfitters coming.

Everyone knows you’re joking with the Vans and deck shoes, but things like Z-Cavaricci’s will NEVER come back in because they look so incredibly ridiculous.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by MARY LEE
2006-10-12 00:42:18

I thought I was the only one having this problem - tho not w/Dexters….. Mine is w/shoddy Nike’s…and other miscellany

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-10-11 14:04:10

“The state documented 14,806 properties entering some stage of foreclosure, nearly three times the number reported in September 2005 and a foreclosure rate of one new foreclosure filing for every 825 households — 1.3 times the national average.”

This represents the inevitable aftermath of bag’em-and-tag’em lending operations.

 
Comment by lainvestorgirl
2006-10-11 17:14:25

Yee-haww! California RE sales declines, now you’re talking.

Comment by awaiting bubble rubble
2006-10-11 20:49:01

I know you’re waiting for affordibility in Venice, lainvestorgirl, and you will find it if you are patient. Asking prices in LA have fallen 6% in the past 12 months, and this is only the very beginning of the foreclosure tsumani. Once the wave hits, prices will go into freefall: http://www.benengebreth.org/housingtracker/location/California/LosAngeles

Comment by lainvestorgirl
2006-10-12 06:59:35

THANK YOU. I think my new favorate color is red.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by peter m
2006-10-11 21:03:42

LA COUNTY IS STILL the last big-daddy west coast bubble region(along with Frisco)which needs to POP BIG! Expect foreclosure rates to skyrocket in the many deteriorating LA innor city pockets where FB’s used 0 down,I/O,neg AM,no-doc’s, stated, ect, to overpay for 500-1000 sq ft ancient pre-WWII built stucco stick-shacks in such lovely gangland paradises as Watts, Willowbrook, Compton,Wilmington, Bell, East LA,Scentral, Cudahy, lynwood, Boyle hts, El Sereno,Jefferson Park,Huntington Park,La Puente, ad nauseum. By mid-2007 1 in 10 homes will be in foreclosure process in these LA subprime areas as their “owners” have no skin in the game and will walk out with nothing to lose but a damaged credit rating.

 
 
 
Comment by sf jack
2006-10-11 13:35:57

“California leapfrogged past Texas and Florida to report the most new foreclosure filings of any state in September…. the state’s foreclosure activity has risen more than 40 percent over the last two months.”

****

We’re # 1 and pulling away!

Comment by Sobay
2006-10-11 13:57:19

- “The latest overall figure represents a drop of $42,000 or 8.1 percent below the all-time peak of $518,000 reached just 11 months ago. With housing back to its early-2005 levels…

One can only wonder what the TRUE DECLINE really is with the builder discounts and the for sale by owner.

Comment by jp
2006-10-11 14:19:56

… plus the fact that those numbers were contracts from several months back in time.

 
 
Comment by P'cola Popper
2006-10-11 14:33:03

You guys are just pretenders to the throne. We’ll get it back next month! Go Florida!

Comment by Neil
2006-10-11 15:08:02

Unfortunately, I have no doubt about that… :(

This is going to be a high scoring game.

Comment by sm_landlord
2006-10-11 17:06:26

Nevermind, Neil.

We’ll get them on sheer quantity. The Central Valley alone will make Florida look like a boom town. If we have to, we’ll call up Palmcaster and the IE to swamp them. So to speak :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Neil
2006-10-11 19:02:24

Oh man,

This sports metaphor is more like a bunch of ant colonies going at it than any small squad athletics…

Palmcaster is definately toast. The IE… at least they’re getting some jobs.

Did I read correctly that September foreclosures in CA in 2006 are 4X 2005? Oh boy… the marching band has left the field… Let the games begin.

Neil

 
 
 
 
Comment by OC Jack
2006-10-11 14:34:12

And SoCal WILL beat NoCal in this game!

Comment by dwr
2006-10-11 15:21:14

Google and YouTube money will save them all!

 
Comment by NikiBayArea
2006-10-11 16:46:58

NOcal will rally late in the game to beat ya’ all!

Comment by JR
2006-10-12 00:28:32

Right on Niki. Sacramento will help you lead the pack on a per capita ratio, thanks to all your bay area investors who rolled into town with a bucket of money. They are starting to roll out slowly now, looking a bit sheepish. Let the tough ones hang for a while. A few years of eating $40,000/year negative cash flow and they will stop defending their $750,000 flipper houses losing equity at $100,000/year. When they get to $400,000 they can toss it in to the bank on a short sale. Another year, and the banks can bunch them all up for auction.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ejamie
2006-10-12 14:01:01

drove by a short sale in Cupertino, CA the other day. First time seeing one of those in quite a while…

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by luvs_footie
2006-10-11 13:38:33

“Economist Christopher Thornberg of Beacon Economics described the residential real estate market as ‘a slow-moving train wreck. We don’t know how bad it’s going to be,’ he said.”

Correct me if I’m wrong………..but is there such a thing as a slow moving TRAIN WRECK?

Comment by dude
2006-10-11 13:44:12

Absolutely, when each car on the track weighs 50 tons +. You can have a hellacious wreck even at 20 mph. Momentum equals speed times mass. More mass = more energy. More energy equals more wreckage. That’s what we’re looking at here.

Comment by jerkywala
2006-10-11 15:10:01

This is a RE blackhole. Nothing that is sucked in would escape. Or it’s more like hell, very easy to enter but impossible to exit.

Comment by az_lender
2006-10-11 18:20:30

Right, impossible. Here in the East I’ve had an awful lot of conversations with people whose friends have had something on the market many moons with ZERO offers, not even lowball offers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by KirkH
2006-10-11 22:55:05

No, it’s more like a train shipping blackholes across the country. No market is safe. And credit will be sucked in faster than the fed can create it when the wheels finally come off.

Event horizon. Pushing on a superstring? Man I’m a dork. Where can I get some boat shes?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by OB_Tom
2006-10-11 13:46:00

Maybe this is the new phrase (like soft hard landing).
Real estate is a train wreck, but it’s a SLOW MOVING train wreck. No risk of a fast moving train wreck (as long as the fed doesn’t raise rates).

 
Comment by Norcal Ray
2006-10-11 13:48:25

It doesn’t matter if it is going fast or slow, if someone has a bad seat (100% I/O loan) or is in the way of the train (stubborn sellers), they will get hurt.

Comment by luvs_footie
2006-10-11 14:00:17

So now I understand………….

Slow moving train wreck= Soft landing.

Good…………I feel better now

Bwahahahaha

Comment by 4shzl
2006-10-11 14:06:33

Actually, I think this a corruption of “slow motion train wreck” — you know, the kind where you get to watch everyone on board get mangled and maimed in excruciating detail. A very apt metaphor, IMHO.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by az_lender
2006-10-11 18:25:22

Ten days ago I emailed a guy telling him to auction his mother’s house immediately for the good of his whole family. My exact words: “With four mortgaged house, you are all standing in front of a speeding freight train.” I guess if I ever hear from any of them again, I’ll have to correct that: you are all on lying on the tracks in front of a slow-moving freight train.

 
Comment by jim A
2006-10-12 04:30:39

It may be filmed in slow motion, but the train in question is careening down a mountain pass with no brakes. Meanwhile conductor David Lereh says: “More coal, we’re making real good time.”

 
 
Comment by ed in texas
2006-10-12 03:45:10

As I’ve said before, the difference between a ‘hard’ landing and a ’soft’ landing is who it lands on.
(Sort of like that NY Yankees pitcher yesterday…does it count as a landing if you stop before you reach the ground?)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by GH
2006-10-11 14:25:56

I believe the train wreck analogy represents the massive momentum and scale of the housing bubble. This crash will unfold over a period of years and in stages. Prices will not move downward much until property sales become mandatory and we can get rid of the “indignant seller” nonesense.

Comment by CA renter
2006-10-11 17:44:22

GH,
Definitely.

 
 
Comment by azSun
2006-10-11 14:34:12

slow motion train wreck …
To paraphrase above L = mv. There is so much energy involved in getting 50 ton cars to move, even slowly, that when the front of the train wrecks the following cars just keep piling on. It’s not like a car crash where, boom, it’s over. For slow moving trains you get to watch each car derail and get crushed. You think with each additional car it will finally stop but it doesn’t. The cars just keep coming, and coming and coming, slowly one at a time and get turned into scrap metal. So the whole train wreck can take several minutes to unfold and there is so much momentum involved that nothing can stop it, you just have to watch it unfold knowing that the car 20 cars back is going to get destroyed in about two minues and there is nothing you or anyone can do about it.

Comment by Home_a_Loan
2006-10-11 17:41:08

It’s momentum, not exactly energy. Also, L is usually reserved for angular momentum. Linear momentum is normally “p”.

Point taken, of course.

Comment by az_lender
2006-10-11 18:35:32

And of course you’re absolutely right, too, but if we thought of this particular train as running on a track that encircles the globe, we could make jokes about what goes around comes around etc

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oliverks
2006-10-11 20:08:54

But in electronics we would think of it as current flowing into an inductor which we would label L. A really big inductor, which is about to saturate, with some voltage sensitive components behind it. Oh never mind …

Oliver

 
Comment by GH
2006-10-11 21:33:03

Ahhh Electronics. Inductance is not a bad analogy to our current situation. In an inductor a current with a fast rise time meets with increased impedence and in effect “pushes back” reducing current flow, just as our housing market is now pushing back.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Home_a_Loan
2006-10-11 13:39:11

There is no University of California, San Marcos. It’s a Cal-State. CSUSM.

Comment by zovall
2006-10-11 13:59:42

nice catch! I was just about to post that myself :)

 
Comment by Hoz
2006-10-11 15:01:39

That is wonderful - I can be an economist at at the University of California, San Marcos! I always wanted to teach at the University of California.

Comment by SunsetBeachGuy
2006-10-11 15:56:14

UCLA and UCSB started out their lives as CSU’s more aptly CSU’s predecessor names.

But San Marcos, now that is a stretch.

 
 
Comment by Desmo
2006-10-11 17:08:26

Glorified Palomar JC

 
 
Comment by dude
2006-10-11 13:41:03

“This is a market different than anything we have seen before,’ he said. ‘A downturn in housing usually signifies the economy will be slowing down in the future.”

Reports lag reality in economics. We are already in recession as of Q3. It will be reported Q1 2007. This guy is spouting happy gas.

Comment by downside
2006-10-11 14:01:04

If I were a paid shill for the realtors I would throw up my hands and say I didn’t understand the current market trends rather than forecast doom.

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2006-10-11 13:47:46

Median home price in San Diego is down 8.1% from the top; according to Charles Jolly buyers are in the drivers seat; so, is it a good time to buy? Perhaps, if you want to drive off a cliff with the Lemmings that bought at the top. At what price point will u buy? 20 or 30 or 40 percent from the top?

Comment by Getstucco
2006-10-11 14:06:58

I am guessing purchase prices and rents will once again line up at 40% or more off peak. I guess that translates into $311K for the median home which sold for $518K at the peak.

Comment by CA renter
2006-10-11 17:49:07

GS,
I think you’re too being way too generous. If we lose 40% (a definite possiblity), there will be a severe recession. At some point, I expect rents to decline (not yet, as they are still rising at this stage).

Since there have been no real wage increases here since the late 90s, it’s very possible to see 1997-2000 pricing — barring any bailout/manipulation. In some places, a 50%+ decline is very likely. Patience… ;)

Comment by az_lender
2006-10-11 18:38:52

Yeah. The unsold “spec” house I am renting in Maine is covering only 1/3 of the builder’s carrying costs. He is simply desperate as the bank is eating him for lunch. I suppose I’ll lose it eventually ’cause he’ll go BK, and even then I doubt I’ll want to buy it. Lots of other rentals in warmer climes will be available.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by jim A
2006-10-12 04:35:46

Yeah, but calling the exact bottom is quite hard. The best combination of price and selection is actually before bottom is hit. By the time prices start going up inventory (and therefore selection) has decreased dramatically.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by peterbob
2006-10-12 10:00:49

Agreed. In my neck of the woods, a 45% drop in prices will get the price to rent ratio in line with historic numbers. Once prices come down that much, I might look to buy.

 
 
Comment by Snowman
2006-10-11 14:44:50

Actually it would be more like being on a ledge under the cliff, seeing all the lemmings falling past, and deciding that it looked fun and joining in…

 
 
Comment by BearCat
2006-10-11 13:53:55

Charles Jolly, president of the San Diego Association of Realtors
Joan Jolly, president of the Fresno Association of Realtors
and is that a good name for a realtor?

There’s dentist around here named Benjamin Chew.

2006-10-11 13:58:38

I don’t know, Ben has been Jonesing for a cheap house ;)

Comment by waiting_in_la
2006-10-11 16:01:21

I’ve Ben Jonesing for a cheap house!

 
 
Comment by notme
2006-10-11 15:00:25

How about a dentist called Dr. Payne!

Comment by catspit1
2006-10-11 15:13:04

I used to go to Dr. Fang.

Comment by TRich
2006-10-11 15:29:03

My brother went to Dental School with a guy named Thuck Vu. I think he was Vietnamese.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Thomas
2006-10-11 15:55:11

My dad had a student name Phuc Yu.

 
Comment by Mr. Fester
2006-10-11 16:33:15

I hate to even say this, but my Dad (a 6th grade teacher in Porterville, CA) once taught a young hispanic kid named Manuel Laba.

 
Comment by marksparky
2006-10-11 16:47:31

There was a colon/rectal surgeon in Dallas, Dr. Louis Stoole(the med students referred to him as ‘loose stool’)

 
Comment by az_lender
2006-10-11 18:41:26

My mother went to a gynecologist in the Phila area in the 1950’s named E. Kent Balls.

 
Comment by Mr. Fester
2006-10-12 08:20:31

Sheesh,

With names like these, I would change my name to Meatloaf of something.

 
 
 
Comment by Thomas
2006-10-11 15:48:46

There’s a law firm here in OC called Payne & Fears. Would only be better if it were “Payne & Suffren.”

Comment by Joe Schmoe
2006-10-11 16:42:08

I went to law school with a Vietnamese girl named Bich Thu. Her first name was pronounced “Bitch” — seriously.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Recovering Homeowner
2006-10-11 16:44:23

San Diego law firm of Morrison and Foerster… they call themselves mofo… their website is mofo.com. Talk about truth in advertising!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by OlBubba
2006-10-11 18:13:57

Ad agency - Huckster & Schill
Law firm - Dewey, Cheatham & Howe

 
 
Comment by chris 415
2006-10-12 08:33:58

There is a law firm in San Francisco named
Low, Ball & Lynch.

I don’t think they handle RE matters, but it would be poetic if they did.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Trojan Horse
2006-10-11 15:13:54

Charles and Joan Jolly are actually an ex-couple. They used to have a Bay Area real estate practice together. Got divorced and went their seperate ways about 3 years ago…the same time their son, NFL tight end Doug Jolly, was traded from Oakland to Tampa Bay.

Comment by Thomas
2006-10-11 15:50:26

Believe it or not, I have a relative whose maiden name was Carol Holly, and she married a guy named Jolley. Reminds me of the Burl Ives snowman’s song in the old ’70s “Rudolf” Christmas TV special.

And I believe her sister married a guy named Berry. No kidding.

Comment by CA renter
2006-10-11 17:51:45

I knew a couple of brothers named Wild Rice and Broccoli Rice. :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mike in Pacific Beach
2006-10-12 13:58:18

we have an employee here and her last name was Pleasure and she married a gentleman named Colon.

Her name comes up as Pleasure-Colon, I am not making this up!

 
 
Comment by Arwen U.
2006-10-11 18:22:14

I went to camp with a counselor from Roxbury, MA, whose name was Candy Cane.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Arwen
2006-10-11 15:26:22

My sister was delivered by a doctor named Dr. Nurse.

Comment by goirishgohoosiers
2006-10-12 05:41:31

I was delivered by a major in the US Army whose last name was also Major. Yes, there was an actual Major Major in the army during the mid 60s. I’ve been a big Heller fan ever since.

 
 
Comment by Gekko
2006-10-11 16:13:39

Dewey, Cheatem & Howe

Comment by speedingpullet
2006-10-11 16:27:08

I went to school with a boy called Orson Carte….

..no, seriously, I did.

Comment by speedingpullet
2006-10-11 16:28:15

Ok, it sounds a lot funnier if you say it with a Cockney accent.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Pen
2006-10-11 16:44:37

My sex therapist maiden name was Getzoff. Her married name is Daley..

she elected to hyphenate..

 
Comment by manraygun
2006-10-11 17:19:14

For the man who feels inferior, Pad Prik is on the menu at Thai restaurants.

 
 
 
Comment by lalaland
2006-10-11 13:58:16

If you read the whole Thornberg quote, this follows the train wreck comment: “He expects the market to bottom out in early 2007.”

What is this business about reaching the bottom in early 2007? Why on earth would that happen? The new federal lending guidelines were just issued; state-regulated mortgage lending guidelines are due out this fall. Prices in CA are already dropping in (mostly) little increments, and the downward momentum is in place. Seems to me price drops will just be becoming amusing come early 2007.

Or does Thornberg think that BB will drop interest rates then, and that will save the day? Seems pretty silly, considering that we are way beyond interest rate issues in this state. So much of the market has been fueled by Option Arms, IO teaser rates, 100% financing, etc. — and that’s the piper that still must be paid, even if BB somehow drops interest rates to the floor.

Comment by Getstucco
2006-10-11 14:08:30

His REIC constituents must pay more when he says the market will bottom out sooner. If history is any guide, the future will prove him wrong by at least three years.

Comment by HARM
2006-10-11 14:17:00

Exactly. A few months back, several regulars posted the site that listed the UCLA Anderson School’s major institutional “benefactors”, which basically was a who’s-who of Fortune-500 REIC mortgage & home-builder companies. You don’t want to bite the hand that feeds you. Besides, as a high-profile economist/”forecaster”, far better to err on the side of caution, then revise estimates downward later vs. predicting Armaggedon and being wrong.

Comment by Thomas
2006-10-11 15:47:17

All the Thornberg guys have to do to maintain their credibility is to be more bearish than the next-most-bearish big-shot economist. Even if you think a 50% drop is possible, if the next-most-bearish guy is calling for only 10%, you look prescient if you say 20%. As long as you’re ahead of the curve, you look good.

Same with gazelles: You don’t have to outrun the cheetah, just the slowest gazelle.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SunsetBeachGuy
2006-10-11 15:59:20

Well said!

 
Comment by shakes
2006-10-11 18:37:19

When I go camping in areas where there are bears I ALWAYS invite a buddy I KNOW I can out run for these very same reasons!!

 
 
 
 
Comment by dwr
2006-10-11 15:05:14

Thornberg is a fraud, and yet he somehow will go down as the guy who gets the most credit for predicting the crash. Whatever.

Comment by bubble buttt
2006-10-11 15:22:11

I would rather have Thornburg quoted in any newspaper than Gary Watts or David Liareah.

Comment by dwr
2006-10-11 15:25:04

I’d rather watch women’s billiards over Desperate Housewives. Luckily those are not my only choices.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by pismobear
2006-10-11 18:39:55

There is a new TV series coming to a boob tube near you. It’s called the OC. Will we see Gary Watts in an action spot???

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by awaiting bubble rubble
2006-10-11 21:00:19

‘Seems to me price drops will just be becoming amusing come early 2007.’

You’re right. During the last bubble implosion, a lot of people were saying CA RE prices would bottom out in 1990, then 1991, then 1992, then 93, then… well, by then nobody believed it anymore. It’s like Bu$hco telling us about how the situation in Iraq will be improving any day now.

 
 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-10-11 13:59:59

“Economist Christopher Thornberg of Beacon Economics described the residential real estate market as ‘a slow-moving train wreck. We don’t know how bad it’s going to be,’ he said.”

Christopher — Got blog? I think that “slow-moving train wreck” description may have originated here…

Comment by Hoz
2006-10-11 15:50:19

HI Gs, You asked me about the PPT- did not see ’til the other night. Posted my response to you on todays Bits Bucket. In response to “Is the Fed with Wall Street…” Let me know what you think - tomorrow. I am going fishin’ now.

 
Comment by amoney
2006-10-11 16:47:31

Hell yeah it did. I said it over a year ago, that was the feds aim. Barely perceptible to the observer. T-berg, you owe me man!

 
 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-10-11 14:02:39

“The $476,000 overall median was down $6,000 from August and off $22,000 from September last year, the biggest year-over-year dollar reduction DataQuick has reported since it began keeping local records in 1988.”

$22K is about four-months worth of income for the average SD household. Not a bad drop, but I suspect more is on the way, as those who made foolish bets on forever-high rates of appreciation will end up selling into the downdraft, and push prices down by more.

 
Comment by luvs_footie
Comment by 4shzl
2006-10-11 14:21:26

Very interesting — the Brits are picking up on Mish.

 
 
Comment by Captain Credit
2006-10-11 14:46:04

Joan Jolly said ‘The bubble is deflating. The air is coming out of the bubble, but it hasn’t popped,’ she said.”

A distinction without a difference Joan Jolly. These cheerleaders never hesitate to pick scabs with their words. I think it’s a freudian indication of their denial brought on by the alarm bells ringing in their wallets.

Comment by M.B.A.
2006-10-11 14:56:59

anytime these people are splitting hairs like this, you just have to laugh and ignore. these quotes are getting better and better

Comment by Duplex
2006-10-11 15:07:12

Its a psychological phenomenon called cognitive dissonance.

 
 
Comment by dwr
2006-10-11 15:07:00

They’ve come a long way from “There is no bubble!”. This is a realtwhore admitting to a bubble. Think how far we’ve come in just 6 months.

 
Comment by dwr
2006-10-11 15:23:18

But, we do have a realtor admitting that there is a bubble. That was unheard of six months ago.

 
Comment by Home_a_Loan
2006-10-11 17:53:29

Nah, of course not, not “popped”. It’s just deflating “off the Richter scale”, according to DR Horton.

 
 
Comment by need 2 leave ca
2006-10-11 14:49:04

Medina’s lawyer, Kenneth Stover of Reno, asked for lower bail so his client could return to California and take care of his real estate business.

Begging to let this criminal return to CA to take care of his RE collapse. He should have his sentence made much harder for his many real estate crimes (presuming guilty before any evidence). Since he has a life sentence, he should then be sentenced to hard labor. A great job for him would be to have to call up FBers and let them know how far underwater they are. LOL

Comment by cactus
2006-10-11 18:32:39

Too bad he didn’t make cars like De-Lorean then he could have walked.

 
 
Comment by Gekko
2006-10-11 14:56:21

-
Does this look right? Can it help us predict the duration of the correction?

1980 Bust
1981 Bust
1982 Bust
1983 Bust
1984 Bust
1985 Turn
1986 Boom
1987 Boom
1988 Boom
1989 Boom
1990 Turn
1991 Bust
1992 Bust
1993 Bust
1994 Bust
1995 Bust
1996 Turn
1997 Boom
1998 Boom
1999 Boom
2000 Boom
2001 Boom
2002 Boom
2003 Bubble
2004 Bubble
2005 Bubble
2006 Turn

Comment by M.B.A.
2006-10-11 14:59:20

Gekko - it appears to me that the bust is about one year longer than the boom - and we never had such a bubble. Based on this illustration, I would say we have 9-10 years before we can think of turning around…

Comment by dwr
2006-10-11 15:09:11

or, looking at it another way, if the late 80s can’t be called a bubble but the last 3+ years can be termed a bubble, we could be in for a much different experience than in the early 90s.

Comment by M.B.A.
2006-10-11 15:12:37

maybe each bubble year = 3 regular years. Oh well, I guess it will be 2020 before this turns around!!!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by dwr
2006-10-11 15:15:31

or, there was no real bursting of a bubble in the 90s (just a “slow leak of a balloon”) because there was just a boom period without a real bubble forming, but this time there is a bubble and it will burst.

 
 
 
Comment by SimpleSimon
2006-10-11 15:30:18

Actually, If I were to guess at it, it will probably be much shorter than that, but the magnitude of the drop will be greater. My reasoning is that in the past few years RE crossed the line from being a place to live to becoming an investment. In doing so, it now is subject to all of the volatility associated with it. Right now we are still in somewhat of the denial stage. Once the must-sells who can now longer service the debt begin to hit the tape, the downward momentum will accelerate. Similar to stock market corrections which tend to be swift.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2006-10-11 17:57:37

Thank you! Yes, downturns are swift. This one started a year ago now. The bottom will be reached around mid-2007.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by John
2006-10-11 19:55:36

Name one real estate downturn that was swift.

 
Comment by johnfromia
2006-10-11 22:19:09

I’d say not so swift. I think it takes a while for the bankruptcies to pile up and the regulators to pressure the banks to dump their REO’s. If we get to that point, that’s when the fire sale will be IMO.

 
Comment by johnfromia
2006-10-11 22:22:17

Err, bankruptcies should be foreclosures. Those things take time.

 
 
 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2006-10-11 15:40:27

90’s was east and west and the in between states either went nowhere(mid west) or crashed w oil in 85
it’s different this time !

 
Comment by Premature Curmudgeon
2006-10-11 15:44:48

The prior scenarios provide an indication of what could happen, but from everything I’ve read the circumstances are somewhat different this go around. My 2 cents.

 
Comment by waiting_in_la
2006-10-11 16:11:24

let me give it a shot

1983 Bust
1984 Bust
1985 Turn
1986 Boom
1987 Boom
1988 Boom
1989 Boom
1990 Turn
1991 Bust
1992 Bust
1993 Bust
1994 Bust
1995 Bust
1996 Turn
1997 Boom
1998 Boom
1999 Boom
2000 Boom
2001 Boom
2002 Boom
2003 Bubble
2004 Bubble
2005 Bubble
2006 Turn
2007 Bust
2008 Uber-Bust!
2009 Bust
2010 Bust
2011 Turn

Comment by sf jack
2006-10-11 16:57:03

I’ve been saying 2012 is a “bottom” for a while now and I do like the “Uber-Bust!” touch of waiting_in_la.

But after thinking about and reading this discussion, I’m willing to say it’s going to be even later. This bubble far exceeds the other peaks in the last 30 some years (average California monthly mortgage payment is 22% higher than at the least peak, adjusted for inflation).

How much later, I don’t know.

Didn’t Eric Janszen say 2013? Or was it 2017? Or somewhere in between…

Comment by Gekko
2006-10-11 17:09:07

-
Annual Total Returns
Year Nasdaq 100
Index®
1986 6.89%
1987 10.49%
1988 13.54%
1989 26.17%
1990 -10.41%
1991 64.99%
1992 8.86%
1993 11.67%
1994 1.74%
1995 43.01%
1996 42.74%
1997 20.76%
1998 85.43%
1999 102.08%
2000 -36.82%
2001 -32.62%
2002 -37.53%
2003 49.45%
2004 10.72%
2005 1.90%
9/29/2006 0.87%

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Gekko
2006-10-11 17:17:46

-
If Housing mirrors Nasdaq meltdown sequence (disregard the actual % numbers, other than indication of +/- and severity, not actual predicted numbers. I believe the psychology and the sequence of the “madness of crowds” repeats itself - albeit not exactly.

2005 102.08% (Peak Year of Cycle (2000 for Nasdaq))
2006 -36.82%
2007 -32.62%
2008 -37.53%
2009 49.45%
2010 10.72%
2011 1.90%
9/29/2012 0.87%

 
 
Comment by LArenter
2006-10-12 06:06:29

You know the Mayan calendar abruptly ends in 2012!!! Omen???

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by mrgynch
2006-10-11 18:45:34

Thanks for the insight. I’m trying to wrap myself around all those Busts.

 
Comment by CA renter
2006-10-11 23:07:46

Also agree with “waiting in LA”. The BIG year of the downturn will be 2008 or later *barring a bailout*. I think it will also go beyond 2012. There are demographic changes this time which will put downward pressure on prices for a long, long time to come.

 
 
 
Comment by Chrisinpnw
2006-10-11 14:56:57

What do you all think of this little personal RE bubble story……..
I have friend in Marin county just north of SFO. He has a really great home in San Rafael. Early last year I suggested to him that he sell his condo in Kona and pay off his home, to my surprise he did this. This summer he found a smaller home on the water to down size into. So far so good. I said great, just sell your home first. Oop’s, some one else wanted the waterfront property, so they took out a bridge loan last week and bought it for 1.5 million. His current home has been on the market at 1.95 million for 60 days with no offers. I believe the take out on his loan cost over 10K and I can’t imagine want the monthly cost of a bridge loan would be? His wife sez no problem as “Marin RE will always hold it’s value”.
Now the punch line……..we are both retired from ual and when our pensions went to the PBGC, we lost over 40% of our monthly checks.
Me thinks he is playing with fire………

Comment by jerkywala
2006-10-11 15:18:32

Your friend is toast. Keep telling your friend’s wife to repeat praying “Marin RE will always hold its value, so help me God” at the altar. The lord might have some mercy for her. But I heard that Mr. Market doesn’t have any mercy at all!

 
Comment by walt526
2006-10-11 16:33:00

My parents are about to put their “$3M home” in Kentwoodlands on the market. I haven’t had the heart the tell them about this blog or that they won’t get anywhere near what their house appraised for in 2005 when they refinanced to get a HELOC. They bought in 1997, so hopefully they’ll be okay.

Comment by manraygun
2006-10-11 18:11:15

Don’t you think you should tell them so they don’t go crazy with the HELOC?

 
Comment by lip
2006-10-11 18:58:41

Walt,

Tell them about this blog now. It’s better for them to sell now than to wait a year and then sell. I’ve been through this in my own life, always lower than many, but never low enough to get the right offer.

Lip

 
 
Comment by asuwest2
2006-10-11 16:43:34

time to stop by the church gift store to get the statuette for the yard!

 
Comment by Rainman18
2006-10-11 17:52:12

Chrisinpnw,

My Dad, also a retired UAL pilot, moved from a large house in La Quinta on the 7th hole to Memphis into a huge house on the 5th hole. When he heard of the UAL shenanigans he sold and bought a really nice condo with cash on the Cumberlin River in Dover. He saw the writing on the wall and said he wanted to get himself into a position where UAL couldn’t screw him. We know several UAL reitired who wern’t so fortunate. Cue Gershwin music.

 
Comment by rms
2006-10-12 04:53:25

“Now the punch line……..we are both retired from ual and when our pensions went to the PBGC, we lost over 40% of our monthly checks.”

I still can’t believe that the U.S. is willing to f#ck over its pilots. Most people don’t realise what the job requires, i.e., no DUIs, no obesity, good motor skills, an I.Q., unscheduled time away from home, etc., and yet the courts allow it happen. Makes me wonder when my turn is coming.

 
Comment by Mike in Pacific Beach
2006-10-12 14:51:33

Even the realtors “have a bridge to sell ya….”

Let me know where the property is, I’d be happy to take it off his hands in 2008 during the foreclosure sale.

 
 
Comment by Auction Heaven in '07
2006-10-11 15:13:35

“Slow Motion Train Wreck” is actually pretty accurate.

Here’s why:

People are HELOC’d into ridiculous prices and simply CAN’T lower their prices to sell.

Thus, many, many Californians have NO OPTION but to allow their homes to go into foreclosure, be sold at auction- or go back onto the MLS.

Most homes WILL NOT sell at auction first time around, since the asking price will begin too high for buyers to buy.

Therefore, a “Slow Motion Train Wreck” scenario does appear to be unfolding.

Multiple auctions per house, multiple re-listings on the MLS, and more bankruptcies than we’ve ever seen in human history in a short span of time.

This is what came of ‘Flip That House’, ‘Property Ladder’, and ‘Buy Me’.

Yet another America Hysteria, ending in poverty and pointless human suffering.

Think I’m gonna go buy the wife and I a nice steak dinner at Lonestar to celebrate.

Nicest “Slow Motion Train Wreck” I’ve seen in years.

Bring on the ‘Pain’!

Comment by dwr
2006-10-11 15:19:03

“Most homes WILL NOT sell at auction first time around, since the asking price will begin too high for buyers to buy.

Therefore, a “Slow Motion Train Wreck” scenario does appear to be unfolding.

Multiple auctions per house, multiple re-listings on the MLS, and more bankruptcies than we’ve ever seen in human history in a short span of time.”

Sounds like you’re predicting a bubble bursting in ‘07, rather than a slow motion train wreck.

Some things I know for sure, people on average are much more likely to walk away from obligations than they ever have been in the past, people are in debt moreso than any other time in our history, and banks aren’t going to play landlord. Add all that up and I hear a big POP in the future.

Comment by Auction Heaven in '07
2006-10-11 15:29:26

“Sounds like you’re predicting a bubble bursting in ‘07, rather than a slow motion train wreck.”

I guess it depends on how long sellers can hold their carrying costs before going into foreclosure, and then how long it will take houses to get sold over mulitiple auctions- in an attempt to find the ‘right price’.

For instance, if there’s 17,500 homes on sale per zip in OC right now, plus FSBO’s that aren’t listed, how long will it take the majority of those homes to go into foreclosure?

Then, how long will it take to sell them at auction?

The bubble IS BURSTING. There’s no question about that.

The question is, ‘When Will We Start Seeing Dramatic Price Drops’?

I’m guessing we’ll see moderate median price drops until around the end of ‘07. Then comes the whompin’ ass poundin’ sound of the juggernaut collapsing under it’s own weight.

If all these sellers are hell bent on bankruptcy over coming to the table with cash in hand, I think that’s how it’ll play out.

Hard to forecast mass suicide, though.

My brain just don’t think that way, I guess.

Comment by dwr
2006-10-11 15:51:00

I just don’t see someone spending 60% of their income on a house that’s worth 10% less than what they paid when they put no money down in the first place. Once it’s clear to the masses that the bubble is bursting, people will stop making payments, even if they theoretically could make another year’s worth (or two) of payments.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tj & the bear
2006-10-11 17:26:12

My thoughts exactly. Once they’re convinced that prices aren’t going anywhere but down, they’ll bail in droves.

 
 
 
Comment by bubble buttt
2006-10-11 15:36:10

“Some things I know for sure, people on average are much more likely to walk away from obligations than they ever have been in the past, people are in debt moreso than any other time in our history, and banks aren’t going to play landlord. Add all that up and I hear a big POP in the future. ”

You’ve got that right. These people have had no skin in the game from the start so walking away is pretty easy for them. They can file BK and be back in the game for the next bubble a few years from now.

Comment by Auction Heaven in '07
2006-10-11 15:41:30

“They can file BK and be back in the game for the next bubble a few years from now.”

Now there’s a subject I’d like to be educated about.

Okay…let’s say you file for bankruptcy in California because you are ‘upside down’. What happens to the debt? How long is your credit ruined for? How long until you can buy a house again?

I’m not a bankruptcy specialist, and I know the laws have changed…so if any you could offer your intelligence on this subject I’d be very appreciative.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2006-10-11 15:45:46

I know someone who got an A paper mortgage less than three years after a chapter 7 discharge. He had credit cards back before that.

 
Comment by Auction Heaven in '07
2006-10-11 15:48:59

Oh my God.

What happened to the debt?

If that’s the case, we’re looking at mass, mass bankruptcies.

Three years? That’ obscene.

Did the bank eat the debt?

 
Comment by tom stone
2006-10-11 16:05:08

auction heaven,i can get you a home loan 24 hours after you are discharged from bk.

 
Comment by txchick57
2006-10-11 16:05:30

It was all credit card debt and thus unsecured, so yes, the banks ate it.

 
Comment by Auction Heaven in '07
2006-10-11 16:15:21

WOW.

Why in the world am I trying to lead an honest life, then?

Does God see you if commit bankruptcy?

I now feel ashamed to be good.

Wowzee, wow, wow.

 
Comment by tj & the bear
2006-10-11 17:29:25

Sure, you can go straight from BK to homeownership, but that’s now. I suspect credit will be a lot harder to come by next year.

 
Comment by Betamax
2006-10-11 18:44:58

Sure, you can go straight from BK to homeownership, but that’s now. I suspect credit will be a lot harder to come by next year.

That’s a fact. Bankrupts will be financial lepers, just like they used to be.

 
Comment by rms
2006-10-11 19:18:33

But the mortgage will be underwritten by CalPers, and if you default causing retiree pension defaults, high court judges have already said that the state’s taxpayers will make up the difference. So, you see, it really is a magic show scripted by wall street!

 
Comment by Mike in Pacific Beach
2006-10-12 15:11:31

Something like 80% of the people that could declare BK before the new law would still qualify to have all their debts wiped out under the new law. So just wait 7 years when RE is back on the upswing and repeat.

I don’t see the incentive NOT to play the RE bubble game if you have no substantial assests to lose in BK. Huge upside. If you can’t beat em, join em.

Makes me sick that some person with a terminal illness and huge medical bills is treated the same as some “Mr and Mrs Too Much Homebuyer” by the BK court.

The IRS should garnish their lifetime wages to teach them a lesson.

 
 
Comment by OCDan
2006-10-11 15:56:55

Bubble Buttt I agree with your assessment, but that is what really pisses me off. I realize some people have serious hardships, but the majority who waaaaaay overextended and then walk away only to come back in 3 years is not right. If all of this is just a big game then what the f%^&? What good is trying to make all the bills on time and paid in full? What a crock our whole economy has become in this country! Most people past their eyeballs in debt, and/or, consuming waaaaay more than they will ever need or use. We import waaaay more than we produce. How sad it has all become. BTW, this disease knows no race, religion, creed, sex, or AGE GROUP. I had to put that in because after reading the battle yesterday that had to be the longest thread ever, more than 350 posts, I had to say something. This diseased economy is equal opportunity and it is called greed, when reduced to its lowest denominator. People weren’t happy with the size of their home or the modest vacation. Had to have more, more, more, of everything, whether or not they could afford it!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by hd74man
2006-10-11 17:00:43

People weren’t happy with the size of their home or the modest vacation. Had to have more, more, more, of everything, whether or not they could afford it!

PIG NATION!!!!

 
Comment by jim A
2006-10-12 04:54:26

Everyone’s agreed that the high level of consumer credit has led to insanely stupid misallocation of resources. The disagreement is who to punish for these moronic loans: the idiot borrower or the idiot lender. There will always be people stupid enough to borrow their way to the poor house. But because having money to lend usually requires SOME degree of ability to manage resources, punishing lenders through the granting of bankrupcy protection to borrowers seems more likely to slowdown the debt express. After all, if individuals CAN’T borrow, they’ll have to save.

 
Comment by Melissa
2006-10-12 16:57:40

I’m just worried they are going to punish me, the taxpayer who saved their money and is not in debt.

 
 
Comment by dwr
2006-10-11 15:57:36

“These people have had no skin in the game from the start”

That is definitely part of it, but the stigma of bankruptcy or of walking away from one’s obligations is basically gone, at least in big cities.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by OCDan
2006-10-11 16:05:58

Not to get on the high moral ground or be preaching, but shame is basically gone on everything. I once read that the only universally unacceptable things are: cannibalism, incest, rape, and molestation. I am not sure if that is right, but the list of items that have a sigma attached does seem to be dwindling every year, so we shouldn’t be shocked that bankruptcy is off the list.

 
Comment by Auction Heaven in '07
2006-10-11 16:06:16

If what you guys say is correct, with getting ‘back in’ after a
bankruptcy being only a matter of three years, I’d put the big POP at the end of ‘07.

I guess that’s the key to this whole rotten tomato.

How long will it take for these sellers to go into bankruptcy?

I’m putting my money on summer of ‘07 for mass California bankruptcies, and fall/winter of ‘07/’08 for major bubble popping median price drops.

 
Comment by jr
2006-10-11 18:38:11

Where I live murder and renting are quite taboo.

 
Comment by az_lender
2006-10-11 18:58:13

I thought it was 7 years if you walk away from house in CA. Perhaps I am wrong. Anybody point to specific documentation? (Not just anecdotes)

 
 
Comment by cactus
2006-10-11 18:47:39

Yes thats exactly what will happen. I saw it in the early 1990’s in S. Cali

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Peter T
2006-10-11 18:24:36

> people on average are much more likely to walk away from obligations than they ever have been in the past, people are in debt moreso than any other time in our history

Agreed.

> and banks aren’t going to play landlord

What about the government? Wasn’t there a fund made with all the houses from the savings&loan crisis? The government could attempt that again, and then homeowners would press the government not to sell at “ridiculously” low prices (meaning prices of 2001 and before). The government (meaning we) would pay for this madness.

Comment by johnfromia
2006-10-11 22:41:49

The problem with the government keeping the houses and not selling, or allowing the banks to keep them and not take the hit is that’s largely what led Japan into their 15 year depression they are just coming out of. The S&L bailout and RE downturn in the early 90’s sucked, but not nearly so badly. Better for everyone to take the hit and move on.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by crispy&cole
2006-10-11 15:54:30

I still want to know when you will disclose what you do for a living?

Also, who the hell is that Johnson clown on the OCRegister blog?

Comment by Auction Heaven in '07
2006-10-11 15:58:15

If I told you what I did for a living, I’d get the big ole axe, that’s for sure. Wish I could, but I can’t. It isn’t sexy, or powerful, or amazing though, I can tell you that. I just happen to talk to a lot of people every day who are at ease, and don’t mind sharing important stuff with me. That’s all. Nothing sexy.

As for the Johnson guy…I don’t know who you’re talking about. What does he post about?

Comment by SunsetBeachGuy
2006-10-11 16:04:47

Johnson is the razorblade due on OCR’s blog.

In a year, I will be posting offers to help his lender shove the razorblades up his a**.

He is a little annoying and a one note wonder.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Auction Heaven in '07
2006-10-11 16:08:43

Oh yeah, the razor blade guy.

I guess we have to kind to the special people.

Even the ones that dribble.

 
Comment by lainvestorgirl
2006-10-11 18:07:08

Dude, whatever you do for a living, I’m stilling cheering for you to get that house you were dreaming of by the beach, next year. It’s so awesome here, I used to take a small vacation at least every three months, but ever since I moved here (SM area), I haven’t gone anywhere, have no desire to.

 
 
Comment by OCDan
2006-10-11 16:07:36

So you are a psychiatrist or you work for the shadow government.
Just kidding!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Auction Heaven in '07
2006-10-11 16:12:13

Gosh, you guys will be so disappointed in me when I’m finally able to tell.

Maybe I should quit my real job and do something sexy just so I’ll have a good story to tell.

“…Yeah…I was out at Area 51 testing out the newest Alien Spacecraft that dropped out of the sky when this guy started telling me about these 34 houses he was trying to flip in OC, but nobody would buy them…”

 
Comment by txchick57
2006-10-11 16:24:27

This isn’t too difficult given the clues.

He works for the MSM in some capacity. Reporter, syndicated writer, something like that.

 
Comment by OCDan
2006-10-11 16:27:16

Do you know Mulder and Scully?

 
Comment by Auction Heaven in '07
2006-10-11 16:44:52

“He works for the MSM in some capacity. Reporter, syndicated writer, something like that.”

Txchick57 would have been correct, if this were 5 years ago.

Dropped out of all that to live next to the ocean in Huntington Beach.

Damn good guess, though. Damn good. How the heck you came up with that is beyond me.

No, nothing like that now. My job is public. Therefore, all the info that I get from the ‘public’ is from my job. That means I’d get axed if I said where I worked, since I’m giving away peoples plans, desires, anecdotes, and personal info on this blog.

Just a dumb little anonymous job that gives me insight on the pulse of the public brain, that’s all.

Dreams of fame and riches are overrated.

I’d rather be anonymous and be able to walk around with Haagen Daz stains on my shirt than get hassled for an autograph, any day.

Besides, I’m addicted to the ocean, which is where I’m headed right now. Small waves, big waves, it don’t matter. It’s the best exercise around and I’d gladly trade fame for it.

Fame and notariety mean travel.

Happiness is simpler than that.

I’ll take happiness, and a pay cut, any day.

Sorry to disappoint y’all, but there’s really nothing here to see.

Move along, now.

 
Comment by amoney
2006-10-11 16:52:21

My vote is for pool boy!

 
Comment by txchick57
2006-10-11 16:53:56

Canvasser or pollster for a local politician. Maybe a congressman or senator.

 
Comment by We Rent!
2006-10-11 19:47:48

Congressional Page? :mrgreen:

 
Comment by bubble buttt
2006-10-11 20:26:33

He’s David Liareah’s biatch.

 
Comment by mrquoi
2006-10-11 20:44:30

When writers get tire of journalism, they tend to go into PR. A good gig near Huntington Beach would be as a city employee or UCI or some such cushy place.

 
Comment by NVMojo
2006-10-11 22:56:31

hopes and dreams in govt? Small business development or economic development?

 
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2006-10-12 14:54:23

Gigolo. High priced one of course. :)

 
 
Comment by rent2home
2006-10-11 16:46:17

Auction Heaven, may be you own/work at some kind of Health and beauty spa.

Where man is at ease and do not mind sharing information. These are the Interesting clue to keep thinking…
:-)

I would think

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2006-10-11 15:26:27

so, how’s your business ?
mine’s collapsing too

Comment by M.B.A.
2006-10-11 15:49:01

what do you do?

Comment by flatffplan
2006-10-11 18:38:59

sell gps to service contracotrs- they all got in deep w the builders after swaring them off in the 90’s

 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2006-10-11 15:44:48

What would a pre-bubble price be for this? Really nice looking property. Jim the Realtor, if you’re out there, what would you offer for this?

http://sandiego.craigslist.org/rfs/219298327.html

Comment by M.B.A.
2006-10-11 16:34:06

prob not more than 450… lot of land though…skewing the value

Comment by Recovering Homeowner
2006-10-11 16:53:18

That Fallbrook listing has 343 bearing trees - I have a friend who bought last summer (!) in that neighborhood and she had 20 orange trees and it was no picnic. I don’t think being a farmer is a plus in this case.

If you sell the fruit, you may or may not break even - depends on the cost of watering, fertilizing, maintaining, etc etc.

 
 
Comment by oknish
2006-10-11 17:01:00

Not sure if you know but this is Fallbrook. About 40 miles north of San Diego. Pre-bubble price for this would be around 400. My wife’s ex-colleague had a similar home in FBrook and their total cost (land + building) was a shade under 400, in 2000.

Comment by Gekko
2006-10-11 18:38:52

-
Start Amount $400,000
Rate 3.50%
Years 6
End Amount $491,702

 
 
Comment by dimitris
2006-10-11 17:34:48

I’m a bit of a glass-is-half-empty person, but… this is almost due west (downwind) of a nuke plant, no?

Comment by dimitris
2006-10-11 17:36:17

EAST, dammit, EAST!

I’m directionally-challenged too, sorry.

Anyway the comment holds. Do they include geiger counters and a good supply of iodine pills with the house?

Comment by Home_a_Loan
2006-10-11 18:11:48

And maybe some X-ray film cartriges on the walls, so if San Onofre happens to blow, they’ll have nice exposures made of what your insides looked like when you were alive. Something for your surviving loved ones to remember you by.

Now that’s a “glass half-full” comment!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Rainman18
2006-10-11 18:26:32

I grew up in Fallbrook and it’s 19 miles due east of the San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant which is just south of San Clemente. USMC Base Camp Pendlton is between the plant and Fallbrook.

Speaking of fruit in Fallbrook (the avacodo capitol of the world), we had 10 acres of avo trees and it was more of a tax write off than a money maker. I used to hate the chores associated with it growing up but it did allow me to make a little spending money and to take the catalytic converter off of my El Camino as we told them it was an “agricultural vehical” (fire hazard). That seemed really important to me when I was 16. That and my Farrah Fawcett poster, oh and Led Zeppelin.

Comment by moqui
2006-10-11 19:13:52

DOB 1964?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jim
2006-10-12 05:45:23

LOL! I’m DOB 1964 and I had that poster!

 
 
Comment by We Rent!
2006-10-11 19:55:18

Hope yer not a kkk-loving racist f%ck like every member (and mothers) of the Fallbrook soccer teams I played against back in the club days. We had two white kids, me, and about 14 of the type that Fallbrookers seem to hate. We kicked the snot out the team every year - but their sidelines started enough fights and forced enough terminations that we began boycotting the match (better to take a forfeit that to get shot by bigots).

I kid you not - Fallbrook leaves a baaaaaad taste in the mouth.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by We Rent!
2006-10-11 19:57:15

-THAN to get shot…

 
Comment by Rainman18
2006-10-11 21:41:06

WeRent,

I can assure you that your experience with Fallbrook is not the Fallbrook that I know. Yes, Tom Metzger, moved there back in the ’70’s and started his little KKK Aryan club but what I saw is people constantly vandalizing his house and students harassing his kids to the point to where they had to be taken out of public school BECAUSE of their affiliation with that group. We didn’t want him there and Fallbrook by simple association has suffered image wise because of him. Your portrayal of Fallbrook as a racist hotbed is understandable considering your experience but unfortunately racism (and skinheads) exits in every city and town. To paint a whole community with whatever happened at your soccer games is a form of bigotry itself.
And by the way, I know you didn’t mean it directly but your pondering about me being a racist based on nothing except where I grew up leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

 
 
 
Comment by Melissa
2006-10-12 16:56:24

When I saw that house my first thought was forest fires.

 
 
Comment by CA renter
2006-10-11 23:40:37

Txchick,
Here’s the MLS listing with more pictures:

http://tinyurl.com/qd8uz

Not sure how familiar you are with Fallbrook, but that house in in the De Luz area which is waaaaay out there in the middle of nowhere on narrow, hilly winding roads. The property looks to be mostly sloped and the house hasn’t been upgraded by the looks of things.

Personally, I wouldn’t offer more than $350K (lowball) or $400K (probably a reasonable price). That house & property look like they have major maintenance issues.

Of course, if you like being far away from anyone & anything, then that property would be very nice! :)

 
Comment by Mike in Pacific Beach
2006-10-12 15:45:33

You could befriend the local Aryan Nation / KKK kooks, lots of room to burn crosses.

 
 
Comment by OCDan
2006-10-11 16:00:29

I can’t wait to see the old Slate and Leone (sp?) ads for bankruptcy. I remember seeing them 20 years ago in college. It will be bittersweet to see that old guy telling us to call 1-800-whatever the numebr is. That is going to be the new business to get into. I suspect a good 3-5 years of solid work. Just think, with all the work, then you could out buy some of these overpriced POS.

 
Comment by tom stone
2006-10-11 16:13:07

OT i spent a little time at Appraisersforum.com today,they have a thread debating whether or not there is a bubble….hop in and have some fun,these boys and girls need some educating.

Comment by hd74man
2006-10-11 17:11:03

hop in and have some fun,these boys and girls need some educating.

I used to hang there until I discovered this blog.

The hardcores are all gone.

Most current posters are idiot newbie trainee’s workin’ for chump change at a two-bit, rubber stamping hackshop, churning out computer canned drivel on sub-prime garbage for some mortgage sleazebag ready to cut his throat because he isn’t makin’ 40 large a week anymore to pay for his McMansion, Hummer, wife, kids and 2 mistresses.

These drones ain’t got a clue.

Comment by mrincomestream
2006-10-11 19:43:56

I’m not sure I have a grasp of how you really feel.

Comment by CA renter
2006-10-11 23:53:45

LOL! :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ed in texas
2006-10-12 04:17:16

Yeah, man, I can feel that you’re trying to tell us something.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2006-10-11 17:49:39

Whew! California real estate prices falling. San Diego prices falling 4.5% last month! Significant! An additional 3% this month or will it be 6%?

3 month T-bill rates are starting to go up again, in case people did not notice. I ordered another $1,000 worth. Makes $3k in the last 3 weeks. Usually I buy $1k per month. I’m going to buy me a California ocean view home in 2012 at a huge discount! Nice thing about that - property tax will be based on the lower purchase price. I love Proposition 13! It was the first proposition I voted for when I was 19 and when I first became a major fan of the free market. I still am a major fan of the free market at age 47!

Comment by Patriotic Bear
2006-10-11 18:43:00

Prop 13 has nothing to do with the free market.

Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2006-10-11 19:07:11

I remember how all those statists came out of the woodwork with those scare tactics back when the proposition passed. Let’s see: “Prop 13 has nothing to do with the free market.” So low / no taxes are not synonymous with free market economics? Let me ask Ludwig Von Mises that question. Oops, he’s dead. But I disagree with you based on common sense.

Comment by weinerdog43
2006-10-12 07:53:22

“I remember how all those statists came out of the woodwork with those scare tactics back when the proposition passed”

Please stop. You’re just embarrassing yourself.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2006-10-12 17:01:58

“Please stop. You’re just embarrassing yourself”
- Not really. It’s just your delusion. Have another Shroom.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by BurstingInTheOC
2006-10-11 18:02:59

This is my first post, after lurking for many weeks. I had my first encounter with a “sign” of the times. In my neighborhood, I’ve noticed a handful of properties which have sat on the market for quite awhile. A couple of weeks ago, one of them got a new addition, a “In Escrow” sign attached to the top. A couple of days ago, it was gone, and has not returned.

I’m in a condo complex in South O.C., California, and one building over from that is another unit which has both a For Sale and a For Lease sign on it. Easily been well over a month it has sat.

Comment by Home_a_Loan
2006-10-11 18:17:02

One of those in my neck of the woods. On the corner, a for-sale sign next to a for-rent sign, same address, same condo unit. The rent price is pretty reasonable, similar to mine. $5 says he’d rather sell. ;) Been on the market for 4-5 months now (rental sign, maybe 2-3 months).

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2006-10-11 18:41:03

Within a half mile of my house are three houses that are both for sale and for rent.

 
 
Comment by bmfarley
2006-10-11 18:20:56

Where did the sign flipers go? back to school?

 
Comment by RottedOak
2006-10-11 19:01:01

“For the second straight month, local single-family home values failed to appreciate …”

Gotta admire the media’s ability to come up with euphamisms when prices are dropping.

 
Comment by bruin
2006-10-11 19:08:17

This is an awesome listing from ZipRealty.com:

http://tinyurl.com/qmcbo

Description:
Beutiful flor plan, 3bedroos, 2.5 bath, big kitchen whit familyroom and brekfast area, and estudio whit french doors can be 4 bedroom

Comment by melody
2006-10-11 21:08:23

In Funtucky? Please spare me.

Comment by Lip
2006-10-12 02:50:17

I love that name, but I thought it was Fon-tucky. It’s amazing how things like that stick to a town.

Comment by David
2006-10-12 03:28:28

“Beutiful flor plan, 3bedroos”

I’ll just put my kangaroos there!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by oc-ed
2006-10-12 09:53:14

Zip must only have one agent for SoCal. She’s the same one I see for properties here in Costa Mesa. Boy, she needs to proof read her listings.
And 500k+ for Fontana - holy crap my drawers - that place is, with apologies to those who live there and love it, an armpit.

 
 
Comment by Daniel
2006-10-11 19:26:57

Here’s a sad tale…. yesterday I was eating dinner at a nice eatery. I looked up and my neighbors (hot) x-wife is my waitress. I asked her curiously how she was doing - knowing full well she made out very well in the divorce and I didn’t ever think she’d be serving me. She said sheepishly, “I invested my divorce settlement in (Gulp) condos. I thought they were a sure bet. After taking my T-bone order, she confided in me that she bought (4) condos and they’ve sat on the market over 6 months without a single offer. I looked out the window… the fiery red San Diego sunset seemed all too aprapos. Whew, I almost asked her out!

Comment by Lagnley
2006-10-11 20:09:38

Maybe her ex-husband will buy it back at the auction….

 
Comment by Carlsbad renter
2006-10-11 21:06:08

Daniel, I love stupid hot women. Just don’t give them any money or let them make dumb–s decisions concerning money…..like buying condos in downtown or in any other place in SD. How old do you think she is?

Comment by melody
2006-10-11 21:17:12

The sad thing is she is not alone. Tons of flippers caught with their pants down.

 
Comment by Daniel
2006-10-12 09:06:39

She graduated from H.S. in 92′…unless she was held back (possible so -given her stupidity) she’s 32.

 
 
 
Comment by Dimitris
2006-10-11 21:07:54

Any advice on REITs? Thinking of betting against. (Leaps)

 
Comment by waiting in lA
2006-10-11 21:50:31

God I love california! Just moved here from Chicago last year in August at the peak, I didn’t buy. I guess I’ll be watching the ride down for many years to come. Every thing tells me that we have just begun.

Comment by CA renter
2006-10-12 00:11:37

Are you the same “waiting_in_LA”? We have someone by that name already, if you’re not. Perhaps you might want to change the username to waiting in LA 2 or something?

Not trying to butt in, but have had the same thing happen to me and saw another poster go through the same thing the other day “happy renter” vs “happy_renter”.

If you’re new, welcome! :)

 
 
Comment by Mike in Pacific Beach
2006-10-11 21:54:38

The San Diego collapse is finally over! Yippie:

http://tinyurl.com/f7zov

Comment by CA renter
2006-10-12 00:07:19

“We have a housing shortage and a great diversified economy,” Maloney cited as his reason for optimism.
———————
When you hear a$$inine comments like, you really understand why some people dislike realtors (I’m trying to be nice here).

We have the highest inventory EVER in San Diego, and these nitwits are trying to fool people into thinking there is a “shortage” of land.

 
 
Comment by Russ Winter
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post