October 12, 2006

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For October 12, 2006

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

79 Comments »

Comment by PDXrenter
2006-10-12 04:28:18

This is OT but may be useful to small-time investors and traders here…. from WSJ Oct. 11 Page D1: zecco.com is offering free online trading accounts, and Bank of America is starting to offer no-commission stock trades to customers with more than $25K combined (available in the Northeast USA right noow).

BTW thanks for the pointers to thinkorswim & optionxpress yesterday, Txchick.
________________
Bank of America To Offer Free Trading
Move Applies to Clients With as Little as $25,000 in Deposits;
Escalating an Industry Price War
By VALERIE BAUERLEIN
October 11, 2006; Page D1

Bank of America Corp., escalating a raging price war as banks and brokerage firms battle for online stock-trading customers, plans to offer as many as 30 free trades a month to millions of customers with at least $25,000 in deposits.

The move, to be announced today, is effective immediately in New York City, Boston and other areas in the Northeast where Bank of America — which is based in Charlotte, N.C. — is a relative newcomer but has been pushing hard to challenge Citigroup Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and other financial giants on their home turf. Bank of America officials are likely to extend free stock trades to the rest of the U.S. by February.
As many as a third of Bank of America’s 50 million individual consumer-banking customers are ultimately expected to qualify for free online trades. By comparison, Charles Schwab Corp., a leading online brokerage, has about 6.8 million active accounts. To be eligible, Bank of America customers must have $25,000 or more in any combination of checking, savings and other deposit-related bank accounts.
…..
Last week Zecco Holdings Inc.’s Zecco.com started offering free trades to build traffic to its Web site, which aims to become a social-networking hub for traders.

Other companies have tried offering free trades and failed, hurt by rising regulatory costs and other factors. Yet no bank has made as big a play as Bank of America, with its broad strategy of using free trades as a perk for a dedicated relationship, echoing frequent-flier and other reward programs.

Unlike pure brokerages, Bank of America’s motive isn’t getting a customer’s trading business per se. Instead, the company wants people to centralize their assets in one place, in keeping with its long-held tenet that customers are most happy and profitable when doing business with one financial-services company. So far, some consumers have resisted the financial-supermarket model, but Bank of America says its research shows that more people are warming to the idea.

WSJ article tinyurl.com/qent3

Comment by az_lender
2006-10-12 04:36:44

Three thoughts: (1) This price war will facilitate development of a temporary “echo” stock bubble. (2) No it won’t, because the number of people who actually HAVE $25,000 will be shrinking too fast. (3) Wonder if BofA has liquidity fears.

Comment by txchick57
2006-10-12 04:50:57

Maybe they’re trying for the daytrader crowd (25K is the threshhold for pattern daytrading)

Now I made myself laugh.

Comment by reuven
2006-10-12 05:20:41

Will “Daytrading” return?

My Mother-in-law, who never met a get-rich-quick-scheme she didn’t like (and never learns) tried this back during the dot-com days.

She had just come in to some $$$ by suing an ex-husband for back child support (even though, according to her children, she was so drunk most of the time that they lived at friends houses, etc, during this period.)

So she gets 25K or so, and goes to a “Day Trading club” and loses it all. Then she takes money out on her credit card and loses that. Then (after asking us for $$$ and hearing us laugh at her) she applies for BK #3 (this was back in 1990. BK #4 is just about due.)

She’s also lost money on real estate several times. After husband #3, she got $$$ when they sold the house. She thought she was a real-estate genius and bought a house in Redding, CA. that she lost money on. I think she just did a defacto BK on that….send the keys back and stop paying.

However, the day traders don’t bother me much. They don’t cause my property taxes to rise, etc.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Moman
2006-10-12 06:42:50

Funny - but sad.

 
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2006-10-12 05:22:55

Liquidity was my first though too. They’ve been getting some bad press from clarkhoward.com. He’s been encouraging his listeners to withdraw their funds from BofA.

Comment by Eastofwest
2006-10-12 06:04:50

As above, they are bleeding for cash flow,and having personally being screwed twice by BofA I wouldn’t give them a 3rd chance…they are rats…….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Moman
2006-10-12 06:44:40

I was in BOA with a problem on my checking account a few weeks ago. Surprisingly, the lady proceeded to tell me what a valuable customer I am (although I only keep $2000 in my accounts there) and bent over backwards to accomodate my request. Just a few years ago they acted like they could care less about their customers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by asuwest2
2006-10-12 11:19:33

WRONG…..it wasn’t an act.

 
 
 
Comment by Desmo
2006-10-12 09:37:39

I had an investment account at BofA, it reminded me of the time before discount brokers and the internet, they had to move into 2000’s

 
 
Comment by txchick57
2006-10-12 04:49:54

BFD. What you gain in commissions not spent you lose in execution slippage.

 
Comment by mrgynch
2006-10-12 05:02:17

It’s kinda like free admission to the amusment park. What a great deal! ‘Step right up’ and play the un-rigged carnival games.

Obviously, the public still doesn’t know the comission is not to be feared, rather loss of their principle to the firm’s proprietary traders.

Comment by txchick57
2006-10-12 05:51:45

Now stop it. LOL. Don’t give the store away.

You want to see some real client scalping going on, Schwab is the one. Of course they use the ECNs now so you can’t see them doing it the way you used to be able to.

 
 
Comment by Bob_in_ma
2006-10-12 05:18:01

“To be eligible, Bank of America customers must have $25,000 or more in any combination of checking, savings and other deposit-related bank accounts.”

Not in the brokerage account, in a bank account. Check out their rates on CDs and money market accounts. They are about 2.5% below what you can easily get elsewhere. 2.5% of $25,000 is $625. So if you make less than 90 trades a year, you’re probably doing better sticking with scottrade.

Comment by DC_Too
2006-10-12 05:50:00

Bingo, Bob. The vast majority of accounts they get from this will not be day-traders anyway. Just a bait and switch. Sorta like “free” furniture with a $650,000 two-bedroom house, eh?

 
Comment by thejdog
2006-10-12 09:25:03

Not True. BOA has a MMA that is paying 5.37% APY one of the highest rates in the nation. It is a carry-over from MBNA, which BOA recentley purchased. It counts toward the $25K requirement.

http://tinyurl.com/u9h8w

 
 
Comment by jp
2006-10-12 05:45:23

I think it’s a wave. Zecco is out there putting it’s stake in the ground at zero dollar commissions, which is going to pick off the low-end of the retail market. I think the message from BofA is that they were not a daytrading marketplace so they need to match or get out.

Txchick’s comment above definitely applies, IMHO. But who knows, maybe they’ll change how things are done by etrade, tda, etc. just like those guys changed how it was done for the old-time brokers.

Comment by txchick57
2006-10-12 06:01:02

I’m just thrilled at the prospect of another wave of GFs into the stock market. Trading was damned hard in 2002 especially when there was zero liquidity. Even if you were bearish it was hard to make money because nobody would take your short sells. I don’t know anything about house flipping but I am one hell of a stock flipper. Bring it on.

Comment by jp
2006-10-12 06:19:23

Bring it on.

ug. I was at the center of the optical bubble craziness in y2k. I’ll let you have this round…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Andy
2006-10-12 07:39:10

An tips would be much appreciated. What’s your method?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mrquoi
2006-10-12 07:59:21

The fastest way to make $1 million is to put your $2 million into the market and just start trading like a crazyman.

 
 
 
 
Comment by fiat lux
2006-10-12 07:41:28

My feelings about BoA wouldn’t make it past the profanilty filter here….. but suffice to say they lost my business after taking more than 10 days to clear a sub-$10K out-of-state check deposited into my account, which caused some short-term disruption at a time when I really did not need any more stress in my life.

Good riddance.

Comment by adopt-a-landlord
2006-10-12 08:41:52

I’ve had two vehicle loans that BofA bought the paper on, and I paid off within a month of the purchase… I love it when that happens! I ultimately pay cash for my vehicles, but the price is always sweeter when they think they can make up for it on the financing.

Comment by John Fontain
2006-10-12 09:42:43

I did the same thing and I agree the price is sweeter. When it comes times for the financing guy, I don’t even care what the rate is as long as there is no prepayment penalty. Having cash is nice.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by AmazingRuss
2006-10-12 07:56:28

Free trades would be fun…but Bank of ‘America’ is currently outsourcing every job it can to India. I just can’t get past that irony.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2006-10-12 10:08:44

“customers with at least $25,000 in deposits.”…..”As many as a third of Bank of America’s 50 million individual consumer-banking customers are ultimately expected to qualify ”

Sounds like John Q Public isn’t as broke as we’ve been discussing here.

Comment by Boston Bruce
2006-10-12 11:58:32

The $25,000 is borrowed, of course — home equity.

 
 
 
Comment by John Fleming
2006-10-12 04:32:44

Every region has the right to have his bubble!

Property boom reaches N Ireland and Scotland
By Jim Pickard, Property Correspondent

Published: October 12 2006 08:39 | Last updated: October 12 2006 08:39

“Prices leapt by 33.4 per cent in Northern Ireland in the year to September while in Scotland they were up 15.2 per cent, according to data published on Thursday by Nationwide, the lender.”

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/333160b8-59bf-11db-8f16-0000779e2340.html

Comment by Desmo
2006-10-12 09:40:39

They are not “building anymore rocks” in Ireland.

Comment by KennyBabes
2006-10-12 11:22:42

That is “damp, wind swept, moss covered rocks being bothered by sheep”, havent you ever been to ireleland??? beautiful, but drippy.

 
Comment by KennyBabes
2006-10-12 11:23:00

That is “damp, wind swept, moss covered rocks being bothered by sheep”, havent you ever been to ireland??? beautiful, but drippy.

 
 
 
Comment by Walker
2006-10-12 05:12:27

On a totally off-topic note, it seems that all of Blogspot is down right now. I cannot read Mish or any of the Blogger housing sites at all.

Comment by reuven
2006-10-12 05:22:17

Mabye It’s the Dotcom 2.0 crash

Comment by fiat lux
2006-10-12 07:43:27

Blogger doesn’t get the attention it really needs from Google.

YouTube, take note.

 
 
Comment by asuwest2
2006-10-12 11:22:46

uh oh…here come the black helicopters.

 
 
Comment by Pat
2006-10-12 05:13:18

FTC Competition Director to Announce Real Estate Law
Enforcement Sweep

The Federal Trade Commission will hold a press event on Thursday, October 12, 2006, at 11 am EDT to announce the results of a real estate competition sweep that will include seven law enforcement actions.

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2006/10/relawsweepma.htm

Heartburn with that collusion? A little tabasco on that relisting?

Comment by mrquoi
2006-10-12 08:03:09

What is a law enforcement action?

Cop gets into car, takes sip of coffee, drives, turns on siren, slows, turns off siren, takes another sip of coffee = 7 law enforcement actions?

I want to see chain gangs of fraudulent flippers.

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2006-10-12 05:25:15

Did jmf take the day off?

Comment by Walker
2006-10-12 05:34:18

I thought that too. Not that I find him annoying. At least he keeps it to this thread, and lately he has been mixing other blog finds with his own.

Comment by nnvmtgbrkr
2006-10-12 07:22:34

Some here have called jmf annoying and I don’t get that. In my book, anyone who is putting forth the effort to expose the bull we’re being fed on daily basis is okay by me. The ones that annoy me are the ones that sit, do nothing, and buy into the crap that is shoveled at them. Most people are in the mess they’re in because of being to damn lazy to do their own research and come to logical conclusions.

Comment by txchick57
2006-10-12 07:29:41

I wouldn’t have a problem with him if 1) he weren’t cannibalizing my sources which he got from reading my stuff and 2) if he would just put it out there instead of trying to drive traffic to his personal blog. Other than that, no problem.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by fiat lux
2006-10-12 07:55:24

There’s a grey zone between appropriate self-promotion and spamming, and I think he was crossing well into the spam zone with the frequency of his posting links to his own site. It’s appropriate information, to be sure, but after a while it does start to feel like he’s trying to ride off Ben’s traffic more than anything else.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Notorious D.A.P.
2006-10-12 05:47:46

OT:

HedgeFundAnalyst,

Per our discussions earlier this week about the industry, please feel free to email me @ david_parker75@hotmail.com. Thanks.

 
Comment by John Fleming
Comment by Sobay
2006-10-12 05:59:30

- “Given a positive economic backdrop of lower interest rates and job creation, we expect sales activity to pick up early next year,” said David Lereah, NAR’s chief economist.

- Ok, I will concede on the “lower interest rates ” … but the Job Creation is pretty shaky. Just what are the wages of these new ‘JOBS’. If 80% of these new jobs have a starting pay of 50-60K, then great! Full steam ahead!
However, if these are Walmart, Carwash and Taco Bell jobs …

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2006-10-12 05:56:29

A Washigton Post article implies the exurbs may take the biggest hit, of energy costs induce people to swap convenience for square footage: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15230632.

Comment by txchick57
2006-10-12 06:07:52

Duh. That was postulated on ITulip’s roadmap for the housing bust many moons ago and discussed here last fall and winter. These guys are little slow on the uptake.

Speaking of ITulip, I received this yesterday and read it last night. Highly recommened for bubbleonians

http://tinyurl.com/t4gtz

Comment by auger-inn
2006-10-12 06:26:10

Mine’s “in the mail” on a backorder. Any specific concept/strategy I should be looking for (in your opinion)?

Comment by txchick57
2006-10-12 06:47:18

Let your longs go up and your shorts drop :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by auger-inn
2006-10-12 09:20:27

Well that clears up my strategy going forward. Thanks for the epiphany! :)

 
Comment by auger-inn
2006-10-12 09:25:45

FYI, you have the sequence wrong, you have the shorts drop BEFORE you let the “longs” go up! :)

 
 
 
 
Comment by Moman
2006-10-12 06:51:19

Business Week had a similar article about a year ago.

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_42/b3955060.htm?chan=search

Robert Cote disagrees with this notion and has good data to support his position but I still feel the exurbs will be a transitory phase.

Comment by Robert Coté
2006-10-12 09:23:02

I don’t know what more i can add except for aquote from the article itself:

While many of America’s biggest cities continue to lose population, and inner suburbs are suffering symptoms of old age, out in the exurbs it’s a different world. Between 2000 and 2004 exurbia accounted for 17 of the 20 fastest-growing counties in the nation with more than 10,000 people.

Got it? The places that are losing population and ecaying and have higher crime and taxes and congestion and few and losing jobs are expected to benefit? The people who publish these articles are die-hard urbanists. They are still in denial themselves from the last half century of being wrong about cities.

 
 
Comment by Captain Credit
2006-10-12 08:02:09

A feel good hearwarming snippet of the WashPost article:

“Consumers who hardly gave a thought to gassing up when regular was $1.50 a gallon are abandoning their hulking sport-utility vehicles and pickups, signing up for carpools, and leaving the motorboat in the backyard now that prices are stuck at nearly twice that.”

Nothing brings me more schadenfreude than the demise of reckless, indebted, “you owe me”, righteously indignant “consumers”.

I bet they’ll say that God told them that financial stewardship can be disregarded.

 
 
Comment by EricinDC
2006-10-12 06:14:10

Fed official talking about housing and the economy for Washington DC Region. Interesting comments.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/11/AR2006101101789.html

Comment by flatffplan
2006-10-12 07:16:32

main point, all gov workers he’ll keep his job while the rest are screwed

Comment by Getstucco
2006-10-12 09:43:00

Flat –

Maybe you ought to find yourself a government job. Just a thought…

Comment by KennyBabes
2006-10-12 11:29:11

Then he would just whine about all those lazy taxpayers expecting things from him like their drivers license, their mail, and their garbage hauled away.

Flat is a WATB (whiney A$$ titty baby)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by ocrenter
2006-10-12 07:18:31

most of you probably heard about a flipper in trouble in Clairemont Mesa part of San Diego. The flip was finally sold in September, read about the update here.

Comment by txchick57
2006-10-12 07:33:59

She claimed on the SDCIA board that she only lost 40k. Bullshit.

Comment by ocrenter
2006-10-12 07:52:08

we don’t even truly know if it was really only $77,000 they put in. sometimes folks like this are sloppy with their accounting and only counted big ticket items, a lot of the time the small stuff from home depot really adds up.

 
 
Comment by mrquoi
2006-10-12 08:10:14

What do you want to bet that either 1) the sale will fall out of escrow, which happens All The Time down here or 2) she took a “creative” way out as recommended by her fellow SDCIA members

Even if the house is nice, you can get the equivalent in a part of town with better schools for far less than $530K.

Comment by david cee
2006-10-12 08:49:44

Called “Buyers Remorse” Nobody wants to be thought of as a “fool” these days, and when she excitingly tells all her family and friends of her great purchase, the chances are someone will inform her that the market is crashing, and it’s a bad time to buy. The word is out everywhere about the housing bust.
I never tell anybody I sold anything until the check clears!

 
Comment by ocrenter
2006-10-12 12:07:01

the sale is finalized.

 
 
Comment by PBRenter
2006-10-12 12:16:37

Clairemont Mesa in one of those places where values would double if the whole place was razed. I can’t imagine paying $500k for the privilege of living there.

 
 
Comment by crash1
2006-10-12 07:23:31

I just returned from a business trip to Reno, NV. Things are really as bad as they’ve been reported here. A couple of the engineers I met with were trying to sell their houses to do a job transfer and have not had a single offer on their houses yet. Just tooling around the ‘hoods I noticed a lot of For Sale signs. Speaking of NV and gambling, here’s a funny definition from itulip.com.

state lottery : n. A regressive tax imposed by the state on those of its citizens it has failed to provide a basic education in the laws of probability. Usage: “You don’t see many Harvard graduates waiting in line to buy lottery tickets.” Related quotation: “I never play the lottery. I figure I have about the same chance of winning whether I play or not.” - Fran Liebowitz

Comment by Pat
2006-10-12 07:35:18

Now, hang on there, crash1. Don’t “scratch off” scratch-offs in an analysis of the value of lottery. Anyone with a child in Occupational Therapy for hand/finger grip or needing some creative math tutoring can tell you these things are worth their weight in platinum for OT and math. ; )

 
 
Comment by txchick57
Comment by lalaland
2006-10-12 08:27:24

Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (the real 1930s one): My worst f-ing nightmare. If this is what we have to look forward to, I guess I’ll just go out and buy the biggest overpriced house I can find. What have I got to lose? Not the house, certainly.

 
 
Comment by John B
2006-10-12 08:37:10

Following townhouses in Alexandria, VA, in one particular community. Wife and I looked at these in Jan/Feb. 05 and they were selling for between $520 and $580 list, with more from bidding wars. By Fall 2005, they were selling for high 500s to low 600s. By July, they were selling immediately when sellers dropped prices to around $530K. Now, there are two on the market, including one end-unit, for $495,000, and they are not selling. This is a DROP OF OVER 15% in less than a year, and probably 10% from early ‘05, and take prices back to early Fall ‘04. These by the way, are very nice, newer (early 90s) townhouses facing million dollar SFHs.

 
Comment by Getstucco
2006-10-12 09:26:17

In overwhelming defiance of fundamentals, the homebuilder stocks seem to be the winners du juor in the Keynesian beauty contest whose judges are Wall Street analysts. How long can these analyst recommendations keep these stocks aloft against a backdrop of steadily eroding fundamentals? (My guess: A long time!)

Comment by Pat
2006-10-12 09:48:15

A little touchup artistry going on, maybe. Millions are easily fooled.
http://www.campaignforrealbeauty.com/

Comment by Getstucco
2006-10-12 09:52:58

Every homebuilder share price deserves to be valued at the present value of future profits, including the future lost value of land owned and optioned.

 
Comment by Ozarkian from Saratoga, CA
2006-10-12 17:47:58

Totally OT but wow that was interesting. Thanks.

Comment by GetStucco
2006-10-12 20:44:44

Not OT, just not obvious why it was on topic.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by SFRenter
2006-10-12 10:05:05

http://milwaukee.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2006/10/02/daily28.html
Get over housing bubble, economists say, growth remains strong

“Some of Arizona’s leading economists believe the housing slowdown is a short-lived bump in the road that too many people spend too much time thinking about.

Instead, Arizonans should be looking at statistics that show the state created 161,000 jobs through August of this year, more than 340,000 jobs since the end of the 2002 recession and had a whopping 8.7 percent gain in gross state product for 2005. … ”

Hear that? GET OVER IT! Stop thinking about it. Better yet, just stop thinking. Boom. Problem solved.

 
Comment by P'cola Popper
2006-10-12 10:28:00

Manufacturers See Slowest Growth Since Mid 2003 per Market Watch

http://tinyurl.com/ujaod

 
Comment by Pat
2006-10-12 11:53:23

HUD ANNOUNCES THREE SETTLEMENTS WITH BUILDERS INVOLVED IN CAPTIVE TITLE REINSURANCE ARRANGEMENTS
Nearly $2 million in settlements the result of Department’s enforcement effort
http://www.hud.gov/news/release.cfm?content=pr06-137.cfm

How come I’m not impressed with the numbers. A couple of homes. That’s all that this nonsense cost these builders. How much do you think they made off of the deals?

 
Comment by Ozarkian from Saratoga, CA
2006-10-12 18:11:46

The strongest indicator that Wichita is different from the nation is the number of houses listed for sale, he said.
——————————
Area home sales drop off
But slower sales in July, August don’t signal doom, experts say
BY DAN VOORHIS
The Wichita Eagle
10/10/06

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post