December 5, 2006

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For December 5, 2006

Please post off topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

137 Comments »

Comment by Paladin
2006-12-05 04:51:39

Sacramento Suspected Mortgage Fraud Update: Dec. 5, 2006

Background: Five houses sold on one street in the Estates at Lincoln Crossing, using 100% acquisition financing, each priced at $200,000 over comparable sales. It appears the buyers have achieved nearly $1 million in cash out acquisition financing. Ben has a photo of the vacant subdivision on this very blog at http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/js_slideshow/#29

Update: Several fellow bloggers made excellent suggestions about how to effectively expose this problem, end this practice and get the perpetrators prosecuted. The two best suggestions are: 1) contact the lenders directly and 2) get the mainstream media involved. Both strategies are paying off very well. Strangely, the hardest part seems to be getting some law enforcement agencies on board.

First Franklin Mortgage has responded to the e-mail notice of fraud and has agreed to review their loan. New Century, with two loans, has been non-responsive, as have Long Beach (owned by Washington Mutual) and Alliance Bancorp. I have followed up again with these last three, copying their e-mails to law enforcement. I will follow up with the lenders again in a couple of days, probably by calling their main offices to speak with their in-house counsels.

The best news is that the Sacramento Bee is opening an investigation. My e-mail to the reporter, in his words, “…is about the 5th indicator in the last six weeks or so that something is going on here…..”. Needless to say, this has stoked my internal fires for justice and I am spoon-feeding the reporter critical information he may have no idea exists.

And where do the various components of our valiant government agencies fall in line?

The California State Appraisers Office sent me a nice letter saying there is not enough evidence and they are declining to investigate! Hello? Five appraisals were completed, each possibly exceeding the market value by $200,000 and 40%. They have requested that I provide copies of the actual appraisals! Idiots. The director said 8 of every10 complaints he deals with are from loan officers complaining the appraisals are TOO LOW!! There must be a joke in here somewhere.

The FBI seems to be somewhat dysfunctional, too. They are unbelievably dense about the problem and keep asking me “Now how much money did you lose?” I again explain in simple terms: “If I witnessed a murder, I would not be dead, but I would still want to report it.” I am going to visit their office in person next week with reams of evidence to supplement what I already sent them. I plan to look the Special Agent (very special at that) right in the eyeballs to make sure her headlights are actually lit.

The Placer County District Attorney is the most responsive of all the law enforcement agencies. I called them and they immediately set me up with the local police and have provided me a framework in which to delineate these crimes to the DA. I think they are going to be fun to work with and seem to be intent on nailing these criminals.

I am taking a break from the action for a few days as I must focus on my real work and my home life. The wheels of justice are set in motion…..slow motion, but motion none the less. And they will pick up momentum soon, creating a crushing velocity of mass to squash these cockroaches of crime. The subject properties are going nowhere and neither are the homebuilders and most of the other participating sellers, who all have assets in place. The criminals and the cash is another matter…. but any continued perpetration of this $hit will stop here and now.

I will leave you with this final beautiful thought: In a few weeks Ben is going to post some edited news from the Sacramento Bee delineating massive mortgage fraud totaling millions of dollars in the Sacramento valley. The genesis of that story will be right here, on his very own site. That is cutting edge, full circle, information age stuff. It is sweet and exciting!

Paladin
Wire Paladin, San Francisco

Comment by garcap
2006-12-05 05:22:01

You might also forward some of your information on to the credit rating agencies (Fitch, Moodys, S&P), which rate the MBS backed by these loans.

Comment by Paladin
2006-12-05 05:40:35

garcap, GREAT IDEA! Next week, any lender who has not answered the questions gets a new e-mail….with a CC to Fitch, Moody’s and S&P. Does anyone know a contact in these agencies who works on RMBS ratings?

Comment by garcap
2006-12-05 06:11:45

you might check their web sites. search under MBS….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by OkieLawyer
2006-12-05 05:24:31

Paladin:

In order for the FBI to get involved, the crime has to involve some activity that crosses state lines (wire fraud, mail fraud).

The reporter is your best hope, in my judgment. Besides, how do you know that there isn’t a dirty loan officer at the bank(s) who is assisting in the commission of the crime?

Comment by DAVID
2006-12-05 08:52:14

Not only is a loan officer probably involved, I bet my money they are the ring leader.

 
 
Comment by Lou Minatti
2006-12-05 05:28:44

Paladin, I hear that mortage fraudsters in Sacramento like to congregate in a place called Jamba Juice.

Comment by Left LA Behind
2006-12-05 05:35:16

Now that was funny…

 
Comment by waiting_for_the_fall
2006-12-05 08:35:09

look for someone sitting on a blue ball.

 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2006-12-05 05:33:02

the CA appraisers gov workers will get raises - either way

 
Comment by Gekko
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2006-12-05 06:29:37

Prosecutions? Ain’t gonna happen. The banks will quietly take their losses and maybe, when the losses get too large, start contracting their own appraisers.

This is a gravy train for the fraudsters. Free money with no risk.

 
 
Comment by AZgolfer
2006-12-05 07:08:14

Did the same person buy all five houses?

 
Comment by SunsetBeachGuy
2006-12-05 07:25:19

Palladin:

Your FBI paragraph made me bust a gut laughing.

Keep kicking A$$.

Blow the lid off of this. I vote for getting more than 1 media outlet involved so that an editor (FB) at the Sac Bee can’t/doesn’t kill the investigation and article.

 
Comment by octal77
2006-12-05 07:29:58

Paladin:

Thanks for the ongoing series. It is most interesting.

Perhaps the national media would be interested. They
are always looking for human interest stories, especially
if this fraud has legs and grows larger in scope. (Sounds
like it will)

Here is a link to 60 minutes:

http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/feedback/fb_news_form.shtml

Do any other fellow bloggers have better contacts within the
national news media to forward on?

 
Comment by simiwatch
2006-12-05 07:54:39

Paladin:

Great work. Thanks for all your hard work.

 
Comment by zeropointzero
2006-12-05 08:36:05

You - or somebody - might also want to post/link this story on any Yahoo or other message boards covering these companies (if publicaly traded). I am sure the companies check the more active of these quite frequently.

I love watching your investigation unfold. Keep up the great work.

Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2006-12-05 09:43:17

I see a best selling expose coming out of all this in a couple years - start taking notes for the book. And keep up the great work!

Comment by Icouldbewrong40
2006-12-05 10:35:02

Screw Erin Brocovich-
I want to watch the movie about Paladin

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Housing Wizard
2006-12-05 21:02:14

My hat off to you Paladin . This would make a great movie if the bad guys get busted .

 
 
 
 
Comment by Gwynster
2006-12-05 09:59:09

Ben, did you see the piece in the Sac Bee on UC’s seed money program? While it’s been going on for a while as a means of helping new faculty enter the market in CA, it’s now being used by administrators for refinancing for remodels, purchasing cars, and perhaps buying more spec homes.

http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/86644.html

This money is not going to the staff who are priced out of the market but to the wealthiest 10% and it’s public funds being used. I’m a UC employee, I understand the need for talent recruitment and retention but I still find it appalling.

Comment by mrquoi
2006-12-05 13:06:49

Here’s appalling from UCSD where tuition regularly get jacked up the wazoo. Trust me, no university flack is worth this much.

http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/newsrel/general/kbrant06.asp

Brant’s compensation package includes a base salary of $230,000, automobile allowance of $8,916 per year, 30 days of temporary housing, reimbursement for moving expenses, eligibility for a University sponsored home loan of up to $1,000,000, and the standard Senior Management Group benefits package which includes medical, disability and life insurance coverage, as well as participation in the UC retirement and savings program

Comment by Gwynster
2006-12-05 16:09:37

Well tuition has this weird relationship with property values. If the property values around a UC go up, compensation packages have to go up or no one can afford to work for them. Parents scream about how much tuition is while jacking up the real estate prices.

But the compensation packages for senior management are completely F@ucked up. Does Dynes have two UC paid for houses? One for his wife still in SD and the big one for him in Oakland?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by OkieLawyer
2006-12-05 11:04:52

By the way, these guys would probably be interested:

http://www.mortgagefraudblog.com/

 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2006-12-05 04:54:06

During the week I don’t get to read all the threads on this blog. I did not see any postings yesterday about the conversation that took place on Squawk Box about the housing bust and the Baby Boomers. This happened on Monday morning. A study has shown that 89% of all Baby Boomers want to stay in their same area when they retire. The implication being made was that this would hurt the 2nd home market.

This morning on Squawk Box they were defending Toll Brothers and trying to call a bottom for the home builders. Toll announced that 2007 profits will fall by 62% but somehow there is a bottom. Robert Toll said so. But they also mentioned the meltdown in the subprime market. CNBC makes me want to get sick most of the time but once in a while they slip a comment past the goalie that really hurts the REIC. One person on Squawk did try to say the coming lower interest rates should really help builders. WTF?

That is the East Coast update for those of you that are still sleeping at 3:30 PST. It must be tough following the markets on the West Coast. You have to get up so early to hear so much of this stuff.

Comment by Ben Jones
2006-12-05 04:57:44

I’ll keep em updated.

 
Comment by txchick57
2006-12-05 04:58:38

I saw that Toll segment. Hope nobody’s still shorting that group.

Comment by DebtVulture
2006-12-05 05:10:48

Interesting, TOL is DOWN in pre-market. But who knows where it goes in this market once it actually opens up. You wouldn’t see a bottom by TOL’s order rate during the quarter. And their balance sheet is in much better shape now than last year - revenues are going to get cut in half for 2007 and inventories are up $1B going into the new year, debt up also. Nice.

Comment by pressboardbox
2006-12-05 05:44:05

HB stocks no longer represent the industry. They have become wall streets favorite trading vehicles de jour. They will continue to trade in erratic surges (mostly up of late), which is what attracts traders. When stocks reach this status they should be removed from the exchange and traded in the casinos of Vegas until people lose interest. Just my $.02.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by DebtVulture
2006-12-05 05:53:45

Agreed.

 
Comment by Ken
2006-12-05 06:14:30

I’m by no means as versed in the market as 99% of the people on this board but I don’t understand why so many use the HB stocks as the bell weather for the housing market. It’s the individual buyers who got saddled with these bad homes and bad mortgages that will hurt housing more the HB stocks. I’m just watching foreclosures and inventories…and auctions.

 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-12-05 06:48:21

HBs product is the homes they sell. If homes are not selling or only sell with the help of massive discounts and appraisal fraud to help the buyer finance the purchase on the mortgage loan (as though a luxury car parked in the garage were part of the structure), the future outlook for revenues is very bad. Thanks to leverage, a given percentage drop in revenues implies a much larger percentage drop in earnings, especially if you own land and options to buy land whose price is positively correlated with the price of the homes you had intended to build there.

 
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2006-12-05 06:42:02

“Hope nobody’s still shorting that group.”

Yeah. They’ve been rallying based on 10 yr note movement and heavy promotion. I assumed the FRB controlled interest rates but that’s been proven wrong. The bond market sets rates.

Comment by GetStucco
2006-12-05 06:50:50

More like a tug of war…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2006-12-05 08:48:18

Nice description; I’ll keep it in mind.

 
 
Comment by Patriotic Bear
2006-12-05 07:37:48

This is exactly the time that you should be shorting this group. The best trades are the ones you feel sick about taking on.

The 10 year bond market advance is most likely over and with it the housing stocks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Stock Regulator
2006-12-05 09:52:06

You are right UNLESS your timing is too wrong - then you are out of business. I know this first hand, and I didn’t take out sized risks.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Michael Fink
2006-12-05 04:59:59

NYC,

Do you have a linkable reference to that stat (that 89% of BB want to stay where they are)? I can see that inducing some real panic down here in FL, as almost everyone knows prices are crazy, but are conviced that the baby booomers are coming to save the market.

Thx!

Comment by Captain Credit
2006-12-05 05:24:46

Bloomberg had an analyst from BB&T on this a.m. He was trying very hard to find a way to put a tux on this pig and couldn’t do it. He stated, and I’m paraphrasing, “We hope to see a bottoming out of housing in late 2007″.

Comment by GetStucco
2006-12-05 06:49:31

If “they” keep saying they are hoping and expecting to see a bottoming out of housing in late 2007, maybe it will happen…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Captain Credit
2006-12-05 06:53:46

It sure looks grim if the optimists call late 2007 the bottom.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by txchicK57
2006-12-05 05:02:34

And here’s another view of the homies saying they’re topping out.

homebuilders
No Bargains in Homebuilders
By Richard Suttmeier
RealMoney.com Contributor
12/5/2006 7:24 AM EST
It was a cruel summer for the homebuilding sector, but it has enjoyed a solid rebound this fall. However, if you’re tempted to get back into these stocks, give it a second thought. If you own them now, consider exiting positions on the current strength.

In a similar vein, U.S. regional banks provide funding for residential construction and development. Their exposures to these loans are increasing while construction is slowing — a less-than-ideal environment for new investments in the sector.

Next year, watch for homebuilders to slide below their July lows, as they get pushed down by the popping of the real estate and housing bubbles. Meanwhile, balance sheets at financial institutions will become even more stretched, leading to a correction for regional bank stocks.

As you can see in the table below, the fundamentals for the homebuilders are showing no signs of stabilizing, assigned sell and hold ratings by ValuEngine. Fair values are well below the 52-week lows, except for D.R. Horton (DHI) .

The Home-builders
Company Name 30-Nov Close Rating (-UV)/OV By Fair Value MOM 5-Wk MMA 52-Wk Low 200-WK SMAs Value Levels Pivots Risky Levels
Beazer Homes
(BZH) $45.66 SELL 64.3% $27.79 RM $43.14 $35.96 $43.08 31.88 M 45.33 A 56.69 S
Centex
(CTX) $55.34 HOLD 32.7% $41.69 RM $52.85 $42.90 $51.86 41.89 M 52.95 A 61.24 A
DR Horton (DHI) $26.64 HOLD 33.9% $19.90 RM $24.40 $19.52 $25.11 17.18 M 25.29 A 30.83 A
KB Homes (KBH) $51.69 HOLD 55.1% $33.32 RM $47.16 $37.89 $47.08 32.82 M 49.83 A 59.59 A
Lennar
(LEN) $52.50 HOLD 64.0% $32.02 RM $48.50 $38.66 $48.15 38.45 M 43.51 A 57.35 A
Pulte Homes (PHM) $33.74 SELL 57.6% $21.41 RM $31.56 $26.02 $29.30 26.43 M 28.60 A 34.88 A
Toll Brothers (TOL) $32.20 SELL 90.7% $16.88 RM $29.61 $22.22 $27.47 25.59 A 29.99 A 37.83 S
Source Key: MOM, momentum; OB, overbought; DM, declining momentum; RM, rising momentum; OS, oversold; F, flat; M, monthly; Q, quarterly; S, semiannual; A, annual. A value level is a price at which my models project that buyers will emerge; a risky level is a price at which investors are likely to reduce holdings, according to my models. A pivot is a value or risky level that has been breached in its particular time horizon; the stock will likely trade around this pivot. Source: RightSide.com

According to ValuEngine, the homebuilders are 33.9% to 90.7% overvalued. So why the rebound? Positive technicals! The weekly chart profiles show rising momentum, and my annual pivots, which failed to hold on the way down into July, are influencing the homebuilders. Annual pivots have been providing magnets since those July lows, but these levels will change in January. The negative fundamentals will eventually trump the positive technicals.

Take a look at the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Housing Sector Index, or HGX:

Source: Reuters

This index is above its 200-day simple moving average of 224.95 for the first time since April 26. If I’m correct, the weakening fundamentals will trump the technicals, and the homebuilders will resume their declines in 2007.

Financials Look Vulnerable

Quarterly data from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., or FDIC, show that financial institutions have increased real-estate exposure. At the end of the third quarter, there were 8,743 FDIC-insured institutions, and only 7% were publicly traded companies. Net income peaked in the second quarter, as net interest margins declined to a 17-year low.

Lending for residential and commercial construction is on the rise, as demand for new homes declines. Non-current loans are also on the rise, while the deposit share of funding has fallen to an all-time low. Here are some year-over-year comparisons for the third quarter, according to the FDIC:

Residential construction and development loans are up 29.5% to $542 billion (That’s a 5.3% rise sequentially).

Sales of new homes are down 33%.

Financial institutions show reserves for losses are down 1.8%.

Loans and leases that are 30 to 89 days past due are up 17.5%.

Non-current loans and leases are up 7.8%.

So far this year, the financial sector has withstood three quarters of balance-sheet stress related to the real-estate market and the bursting of the housing bubble.

Housing starts crashed 14.6% in October, while building permits are down to levels not seen since 1997. Today, there is a six-month supply of new homes on the market, while the pipeline size of new construction continues to rise.

The National Association of Home Builders tried to put a positive spin on a 33 reading for its Housing Market Index, which was up 2 points in November. Given that a reading below 50 is considered “poor,” the light at the end of the tunnel as described by the NAHB could be that of an oncoming freight train.

Since the fourth quarter of 2005, the FDIC has been compiling risk-based ratios. It compiles ratios of residential construction loans vs. risk-based capital, and readings above 100% are viewed with caution.

According to third-quarter data, out of slightly more than 600 publicly traded financial institutions, 270 of them have residential construction and residential loans with risk-to-capital ratios above 100%, of which 105 are above 200%. If you include total real estate construction (residential plus multi-family and commercial), there are 351 institutions with risk to capital ratios above 300%, of which 111 are above 500%.

Back in 1991, when residential construction loans peaked at $160 billion, 13% became non-current loans on the balance sheets of U.S. banks. This time, the impact of increased supply and reduced demand for new homes could make the unwinding of unfinished projects a major economic issue for the finance sector for years, not quarters.

The America’s Community Bankers Index, or ACBQ, is a market-weighted index of more than 500 community banks, and its graph suggests that a topping-out pattern is in the making.

Comment by easthawaii
2006-12-05 07:03:59

Thanks txchicK57, the banking information shows clearly where we are headed imo. Is there a link where I can read more?

Comment by Stock Regulator
2006-12-05 09:55:32

The problem is all this is and was known, the market is supposed to discount this news. It is almost the opposite! Though someone once said that the market is a lot slower to react to expected bad news.

 
 
 
Comment by Buyin After The Cryin
2006-12-05 05:04:40

From Raleigh, NC
Cloudy forecast for local housing market
Unsold homes will linger, builders told

Weakness in the Triangle housing market probably will continue through the middle of next year, the region’s builders were told Monday. Although builders are beginning to cut back on housing starts, tempered demand will take six months to reduce a large inventory of unsold homes, said Bernard Helm, president of Market Opportunity Research Enterprises, a Rocky Mount company that tracks Triangle residential sales trends.

“We will see some real, negative numbers in both new and resale home transactions, as they compare to a year ago, during the next six months,” Helm told members of home builder associations for Wake, Durham, Orange and Chatham counties.

“We now have to wait for the market to find a way to absorb the excesses and imbalances, a large resale inventory and a fairly large new home inventory, in a market short on buyers,” Helm said. “I expect growth later in 2007, but not much.”

http://tinyurl.com/yb55hh

Comment by 4shzl
2006-12-05 05:51:26

So interesting — meanwhile, the “nation’s newspaper of record” keeps spinning away in the opposite direction. From last Sunday’s New York Times:

So far, the market here is robust, according to local real estate agents, although there has been a slight increase in inventory since summer.

Rapid job growth is what has helped keep the Raleigh housing market stable. Research Triangle Park — a 7,000-acre nonprofit center created almost 50 years ago — has been an economic engine in the technology and health science industries.

And this year the area is on track to slightly surpass the previous job growth record, set in 1995. According to the North Carolina Research Triangle Regional Partnership, an economic development organization that manages the park, more than 40,000 jobs will have been added this year alone.

Within 20 miles of Research Triangle Park, about $1 billion of business investment will be coming online in the next 12 to 18 months, according to Ted W. Abernathy Jr., the executive vice president of the partnership. Not surprisingly, the area has one of the highest percentages of college-educated adults: 41 percent.

and

“Prices never skyrocketed here,” said Nancy Briggs, a real estate agent with York Simpson Underwood. “Even though there are a lot of people moving to the area, new developments are being built at a steady pace. The issue is schools. A projected 35,000 new kids will be added to the school district by 2010.”

In fact, many schools are holding classes in temporary trailers. To relieve overcrowding, some have even started operating year-round, staggering vacation times throughout the year.

In Wake County, voters last month approved $970 million in school construction bonds that will help pay for 17 new schools and renovate and repair several others.

In the meantime, the Raleigh housing market seems to be enjoying what can be described as a Goldilocks period, according to a recent report by Richard J. DeKaser, a senior vice president and chief economist at the National City Corporation, a Cleveland-based financial services company. Mr. DeKaser ranked 99 markets, from the most overpriced to the most underpriced, and Raleigh was ranked right in the middle.

Housing prices appreciated 7.4 percent in 2004 and 2005, though that is still below the national average of 13 percent for the same time period, according to figures compiled by York Simpson Underwood. The median home price in the Raleigh area is $185,200, the brokerage firm said, while the national median price is $213,000.

and

The Elliotts are now looking for a home in the Raleigh area. “What’s interesting is, the market here, it’s much more stable,” Ms. Elliott said. “The homes we’ve seen, there haven’t been any price markdowns.”

Mr. Abernathy, meanwhile, says he was not concerned about the slight increase in inventory since the summer.

“There is more housing on the market because there’s lots of building,” he said. “Compared to other high-tech regions, our average house prices are very reasonable. If you looked at the numbers over the years, appreciation here has been steady but not spectacular, so we had little or no bubble here.”

Comment by CarrieAnn
2006-12-05 06:39:41

4shzl:
I was under the impression that disappearing Floridians had the Carolinas in their sites…at least as one of their options. You don’t think the numbers hold up?

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2006-12-05 08:03:49

We left Florida in 2005. About 20% of the new arrivals here are from Florida. Home prices haven’t fallen noticeably, but sales (resales) are way down. I think it’s the problem of people who want to relocate can’t sell their current house. Several homes which had “sold” earlier this year came back on the market.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by winjr
2006-12-05 08:54:15

Well, 1987 was a good year for stocks right?

Comment by Mozo Maz
2006-12-05 16:06:33

Yeah, if you liked trading the price swings! Heh.

I still remember where I was on Black Monday. Looked up from my lunch at the university cafeteria and …. hey …. are those numbers for real?

 
 
 
Comment by arlingtonva
2006-12-05 05:23:56

Does this show the Toll brothers selling millions of dollars worth of shares in the past year:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/it?s=TOL
And these graphs clearly show that things are not bottoming:
http://www.safehaven.com/article-6329.htm

And this guy has the nerve to say we have hit bottom?

Comment by W.D. Potter
2006-12-05 06:07:48

A true sign of a real bottom in the home builders’ stocks will be when the insiders start buying the stock of their own companies instead of selling the stock.

Comment by GetStucco
2006-12-05 06:52:31

Great point. When they are still talking about the bottoming out next year while selling more shares, look out below…

 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-12-05 06:53:52

On second thought, if I were Robert Toll and wanted to convince the market that the bottom was next year, then I could just go buy back massive amounts of company stock, hopefully using OPM, right?

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-12-05 06:41:42

From today’s WSJ p. C1 (my personal comments added in parens)

Ahead Of the Tape
– Today’s Market Forecast –
By Michael Corkery

Bottom Dwelling

When luxury-home builder Toll Brothers Inc. holds its quarterly earnings call today, Chief Executive Robert Toll might sound a tad more positive about the outlook.

Mr. Toll was a dirt-stomping bull during the housing boom. But his company was one of the first to report housing was softening in late 2005 (right after he cashed out a gazillion shares of company stock at the peak), and he turned sour. A month ago, he sounded glum as ever as order cancellations soared and revenue fell (but at least the company stock price remained remarkably resilient since May 2006 against a never-ending barrage of worse-than-expected results!). “We continue to look for signs that a recovery is imminent but can’t say that one is in sight,” he said in a Nov. 7 analyst call (try looking at the inverted T-bond yield curve for a hint).

Lately, he sounds like he might see glimmers of light through the tunnel (kind of like Ken Lay right before Enron went BK?). “I would expect the inventory overhang — which is what is killing the buyer’s confidence level — to be absorbed during the first several months of the next buying season,” Mr. Toll said in an inteview last Wednesday (because everyone wants to buy a Toll McMansion when the economy is headed into a recession).

Inventory is a critical problem. JMP Securities analyst Alex Barron says the supply of lower-priced existing homes in some markets was less than six months in October. The supply of homes priced above $300,000 was six to 18 months.

“Builders with affordably priced homes should fare better than the builders with move-up or luxury exposure,” he said in a note yesterday.
——————————————————————————————-
Is there any mystery about why Toll is toast? A luxury McMansion glut combined with a McMillionaire shortage pretty much sums up the situation they face.

Comment by cassiopeia
2006-12-05 17:20:40

McMansion glut combined with a McMillionaire shortage pretty much sums up the situation.

Well said, GetStucco, I will be quoting you to all my friends….

 
 
Comment by DC_Too
2006-12-05 06:55:59

Arlington - not to quibble, but the Brothers Toll have both sold off HUNDREDS of millions of dollars worth of their own shares, not mere “millions.”

 
Comment by bradthemod
2006-12-05 08:19:38

It’s good to be king.

 
 
Comment by Russ Winter
2006-12-05 05:33:31

What Conundrum? Its Radioactive Dark Matter.

http://wallstreetexaminer.com/blogs/winter/?p=152#more-152

Comment by Troy
2006-12-05 09:03:31

‘dark matter’ could also be all these tract homes waiting for buyers. . .

 
 
Comment by Captain Credit
2006-12-05 05:35:36

Are there any tech guys here that can fabricate a mock up e-version of David Liareah? Like an e-punching bag and post it at the top of this page. And provide an assorment of weapons to take out our frustations on the little basturd. Ya know….. click the shot gun to blast, a knife to stab, a hand to rip balls off, etc etc.

Comment by David
2006-12-05 06:18:46
Comment by David
Comment by Captain Credit
2006-12-05 06:36:51

Hmmm… This Gary Swann scuzzball is a real knuckle-dragging nose picker…. I wonder if Ben has picked up on the hand wringer?

http://buzzsms.blogspot.com/

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Gekko
2006-12-05 05:43:42

-

Late payments on high-risk loans jump
This year is on track to be one of the worst ever for subprime loans, with 80,000 borrowers behind on payments, newspaper report says.
December 5 2006: 7:14 AM EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) — Late payments on subprime loans have surged, The Wall Street Journal reported on its Web site on Tuesday, and while economists don’t expect major harm, a continued rise could hurt investors in mortgage-backed securities.

http://money.cnn.com/2006/12/05/news/economy/loans.reut/index.htm?postversion=2006120507

Comment by Captain Credit
2006-12-05 05:45:43

Thats a buy signal Gekko…. BUY BUY BUY!

 
Comment by crispy&cole
2006-12-05 06:20:02

Take some off the table! Nothing wrong with cashin in a few chips.

 
 
Comment by Gekko
2006-12-05 05:44:41

-
This guy got $1.5M in credit cards to finance his real estate operations.

http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/messageview.php?start=0&catid=52&threadid=662972

Comment by DC in LBV
2006-12-05 11:07:52

That guy is a inbred fool or a fake. Claims a $400k income and yet is cash flow negative on a bunch of old, family owned, previously mortgage-free properties needing a $million in credit cards to delay tax liens and foreclosure? Something doesn’t smell right here…

 
 
Comment by Gekko
2006-12-05 05:49:07

-

Big mergers, big rally
Major gauges surge, with S&P 500 hitting new six-year high, as investors welcome deals and falling oil and shrug off Pfizer.

By Alexandra Twin, CNNMoney.com senior writer
December 4 2006: 5:17 PM EST

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Stocks surged Monday, sending the the S&P 500 to a fresh six-year high, as investors welcomed a slew of merger news and a slump in oil prices.

The broader Standard & Poor’s 500 (up 12.41 to 1,409.12, Charts) index climbed about 0.9 percent, closing at its highest point since Nov. 7, 2000.

Comment by GetStucco
2006-12-05 06:44:29

Party on like it’s 1987, dudes!

Comment by pressboardbox
2006-12-05 07:50:33

I think Gecko is getting a boner!

 
 
Comment by Hoz
2006-12-05 07:35:12

Sprott Asset Management
said, “Having started the decade at 11,000, for the Dow
to only have attained a level of 12,000 after almost
seven years is nothing to write home about. It equates
to a paltry 1.2% annualized return ex-dividends.
Furthermore, the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ are still
nowhere near the levels they were at the start of the
decade. The NASDAQ, in fact, is still less than half of
what it once was.”

And as bad as that is, it gets worse when he adds, “If
one were to also incorporate the weakness of the US
dollar over the past several years, then the performance
of US equity markets looks even worse.”
http://tinyurl.com/yy8ncb

Comment by GetStucco
2006-12-05 08:29:50

Good point, Hoz, and one that I have already mentioned — Gekko always forgets to adjust his stock winnings for the pernicious effect of inflation.

Comment by Gekko
2006-12-05 16:04:00

-
Inflation affects ALL investments, silly.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Mozo Maz
2006-12-05 16:22:40

If inflation is 4% a year (which I think it justifiably what consumer inflation generally has been for the past 20 year), and the DOW was at 11000 seven years ago, it would need to be at 14475 just to stay even.

To earn 3% in real terms (7% rise) it would be at 17663.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Gekko
2006-12-05 17:07:22

-
Please stop analyzing stock market returns based on the assumption that your entire entry point is the exact top of the market (March 2000)!!! To go back and selectively start with March 2000 as your lump sum start date is disingenuous and patently wrong. People like me who have been continually investing in the market since 1995 and continually invested regularly through 2000-2003 have made A LOT of money.

Look at this chart and try to wrap your mind around a continual investment throughout this entire 10 year period - through the good, bad, and ugly. Then think about a 1.8% annual dividend payout.

http://tinyurl.com/ym79sl

 
Comment by Gekko
2006-12-05 17:10:54

-

p.s. I love how you kooks selectively pick March 2000 as your start date. Why not October 2002? January 1995? October 1929? See my point?

 
Comment by Gekko
2006-12-05 17:14:28

-
We have two conflicting kook arguments here:

1. “The stock market hasn’t even broke even from 6+ years ago! Stocks are for suckers!”
2. “Stocks will perform very badly from this point on! The 1995-2000 runup was so big that we have much much much more losses coming in order for stocks to regress back to the historical mean.”

So which is it?

 
Comment by Mozo Maz
2006-12-05 18:40:55

Bears can cherry pick the data too. It’s no better to proclaim how great the market is if you bought in 1982.

The larger point, is that if you didn’t sell in March of 2000 (or near it) you have waited a long time to see those gains return and get near where you were.

I hear it all the time from my relatives. They can’t forget the size of their 401ks in 1999.

 
Comment by Gekko
2006-12-05 18:48:07

-
Vanguard 500 Index Fund Inv
1 Year 3 Year 5 Year 10 Year Since Inception 08/31/1976
14.08% 11.67% 5.96% 7.97% 12.22%

10 Year Average is 7.97% (and climbing)
30 Year Average is 12.22%
80 Year Average is 10.40% (historical mean)

case closed.

 
 
 
 
 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2006-12-05 06:03:23

new day same question
anyone have numbers on wealth loss from stock crash 2000 and a 20% house price crash ?
seems a fair assumption at this point

Comment by tj & the bear
2006-12-05 08:05:08

A quick web search yielded losses of 7 to 8 trillion in the dot com debacle. I’ve read that the value of all US housing is somewhere around 20 trillion, so 20% would be 4 trillion, or roughly half.

Not a good comparison, though. Different people affected & different type of money lost (so to speak).

Comment by Hoz
2006-12-05 08:57:44

It appears to be around 6 Trillion maybe 7 trillion at the outside.
Wilshire 5000 10 year graph
http://tinyurl.com/y26r6e
The problem with your comparison is that less than 10% of all stocks have any type of loans as opposed to housing which is ~ 40% with mortgages. Stocks under Reg T (for individuals) cannot exceed 50% margin (financing), housing 100% financing (w/ some at 125%). The dot - com bubble effected a minor part of America (less than 50 % of the population owns stocks outside of 401K, pension plans etc.) See FDIC “Scenarios for a Recession”, March 2006.
According to the FDIC scenario 10% of all homes will go into foreclosure 71% home ownership to 64% home ownership.
From Stephen Roach
“… That uncertainty has economists arguing about housing’s potential path through the economy. And a recent debate by economists Stephen Roach and Dick Berner, who sit beside each other at Morgan Stanley, shows the contrast in opinion and underscores what investors should be watching.

“The housing downturn is a very big deal for the U.S. economy,” because of how it spills into multiple industries, Roach said. Among them: a contraction in construction, cutbacks in buying such things as furniture and appliances, mortgage finance companies and real estate brokers struggling for business, and what’s called “a negative consumer wealth effect.”

In other words, consumers will feel less affluent as their homes stop gaining value, and they draw less spending money from home equity.

Roach claims the wealth effect is no small matter. He notes that after the stock market bubble burst, consumers pulled back on spending, and that was a factor in the U.S. economy going into a recession.

Now, he said, consumers are less resilient because in early 2000 the personal saving rate was over 2.5 percent. Recently, it’s been below zero and debt burdens are at an all-time high.

Meanwhile, manufacturing is already feeling the impact of the housing decline, Roach said…”
Chicago Tribune dec 1
http://tinyurl.com/ykaj6x

Comment by Mozo Maz
2006-12-05 16:24:51

How many people never recovered their dot-bomb losses? And plowed what savings they had into housing to “make up for it”?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Captain Credit
2006-12-05 06:24:57

“Inflationary Pressures From Wages Lower Than Expected”
http://www.cnbc.com/id/16042046

Weren’t we just barraged with a raft of garbage by an unnamed elected official that “wages are way up” and “workers are benefitting from this roaring economy”?

Hmmm… lets see…. it was headlined 90 days before the election…. right about when fuel prices began dropping….

Had Enough?

 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-12-05 06:29:20

Check out today’s WSJ front page right article. Hopefully Ben or someone else can supply the electronic link, as I am limited on typing time.

Would anyone who has read and posted here for more than a month call this long-anticipated unraveling “unexpectedly rapid?”
————————————————————————————————–
More Borrowers With Risky Loans Are Falling Behind

Subprime Mortgages Surged As Housing Market Soared; Now, Delinquencies Mount

By Ruth Simon and James R. Hagerty

Americans who have stretched themselves financially to buy a home or refinance a mortgage have been falling behind on their loan payments at an unexpectedly rapid pace.

The surge in mortgage delinquencies in the past few months is squeezing lenders and unsettling investors worldwide in the $10 trillion U.S. mortgage market. The pain is most apparent in subprime mortgages, though there are signs it is is spreading to other parts of the mortgage market.

Subprime mortgages are loans made to borrowers who are considered to be higher credit risks because of past payment problems, high debt relative to income or other factors. Lenders typically charge them higher interest rates — as much as four percentage points more than more-credit-worthy borrowers pay — one reason subprime mortgages are among the most profitable segments of the industry.

Comment by 4shzl
2006-12-05 06:44:49

Not a problem. All subprime paper can be fully insured with credit default swaps for hardly any premium at all ($1mm 5yr. cds costs less than you’d pay for an extended warranty on your toaster). Got a default problem? Lay it off on your friendly counterparty . . .

Comment by technovelist
2006-12-05 06:53:19

Wow, I want to buy some of those! The only problem, of course, is that when you try to collect on your “insurance”, you may find it a bit difficult to locate the “insurance company”.

Comment by GetStucco
2006-12-05 08:31:58

I believe that Mish suggested the “reinsurer” might turn out to be Madame Merriweather’s Mud Hut in Malaysia?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Chip
2006-12-05 11:51:14

“The only problem, of course, is that when you try to collect on your ‘insurance’, you may find it a bit difficult to locate the ‘insurance company’.”

That is the part that interests me the most, coupled with the general lack of interest in the possibility.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by crispy&cole
2006-12-05 06:29:20

Casey read this you loser:

Guilt is admitted in mortgage fraud
From Times Staff and Wire Reports
December 5, 2006

A Newport Beach man pleaded guilty Monday to fraudulently obtaining mortgage loans resulting in more than $2.7 million in losses to the federal government and commercial lenders.

In a plea agreement, Lorenzo Espinoza, 39, admitted engaging in a scheme from April 1995 to May 2001 to defraud the Department of Housing and Urban Development and several commercial lenders by using “straw buyers” to arrange fraudulent mortgage loans. The loans went into default, leaving lenders and the Federal Housing Administration holding properties worth less than the amount funded in the mortgages.

At his sentencing March 12, Espinoza faces up to 26 years in prison

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2006-12-05 06:34:59

What an idiot. Savvy fraudsters don’t do FHA, VA or HUD-backed loans.

Comment by Graspeer
2006-12-05 07:13:36

Yep, the Feds take that personally, just like not paying taxes

 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2006-12-05 07:37:58

and some libs don’t like chain gangs

 
 
Comment by walt
2006-12-05 06:41:51

The housing slump claims more victims

The rising number of bad loans in the U.S. squeezed HSBC Holdings’ revenue growth in the third quarter. HSBC — Britain’s worst-performing bank stock — said last month that delinquent U.S. loans had jumped by 16 percent because of an increase in bankruptcies and the weak housing market. “There is little in this statement that will calm fears of a slowdown” in the global economy, said fund manager Colin Morton of Rensburg Sheppards. (Bloomberg) Luxury-home builder Toll Brothers said its profit could fall by 62 percent next year, although it hopes some markets have fallen as low as they will go in the current slump. (MarketWatch.com)

 
 
Comment by leosdad
2006-12-05 07:06:17

new real estate development coming ;)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061205/ap_on_sc/nasa_moon

Comment by Graspeer
2006-12-05 07:17:03

I bet I could find a real estate developer who would take my down payment and a real estate broker who would “work with me” to find just the right crater to live in and a mortgage broker who would give me a Option ARM loan on the property.

 
Comment by Chip
2006-12-05 11:53:18

It grates on me. What percentage of taxpayers would vote to have their tax money spent on this?

Comment by walt526
2006-12-05 12:33:42

I’d want to know more about the economic potential for mining on the moon (or asteroids). From what I recall from school, there’s not much up there of value on the moon (certainly not enough to justify a $100B ticket just to get a “pickup” there). I’ve heard theories that there could be valuable raw materials in asteroids (though no fossil fuels, obviously), but its hard to see how any sort of mining operation would make economic sense.

But I’m willing to keep an open mind. At some point over the next several hundred years we’ll need to expand our pool of natural resources to include the solar system, but at our present level of technology it doesn’t strike me as worth it.

 
 
 
Comment by John Fleming
2006-12-05 07:24:33

BREAKING NEWS ISM services index stronger than expected, October factory orders fall more than anticipated. More soon.
http://money.cnn.com/

How strange that the good and the bad always seem to come out together.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2006-12-05 07:28:50

Here’s a fun thing to do for those of you contemplating going to a real estate “auction”, typically the last ditch effort to get out from under by house builders that knew more about drywall than anything else…

Sit @ the front and look back @ the shills, or in all probability, the auctioneer will take bids from a couple of flies on the wall, as the auction is proceding.

If you are feeling your oats as this is going on and the auctioneer plays like he or she has bids, when nobody is bidding, feel free to stand up and say “there is nobody bidding here, this is a scam”

Nice little monkey wrench to compete with their deceit.

 
Comment by Hoz
2006-12-05 07:46:42

For Florida followers: MGIC has raised its PMI rates for Florida adding an additional 1% to the PMI for loans over 80% LTV on all new refi’s or purchases.

 
Comment by bradthemod
2006-12-05 08:23:27

Somebody get a 20# trout ready:

http://tinyurl.com/yhjr2m

 
Comment by DAVID
2006-12-05 08:59:16

Washington Mutual in Sacramento is laying off 65 loan processing workers. I bet they hire them all back in the Spring when we have the Spring rebound and everything gets corrected.

Comment by crispy&cole
2006-12-05 09:09:08

LMAO!

 
 
Comment by Big Poppa
2006-12-05 09:03:54

An interesting link on some unfinished homes in Arizona’s Pinal county. . .

http://www.azcentral.com/business/articles/1205biz-turnerdunn1205.html

Comment by Mozo Maz
2006-12-05 16:32:36

Unfunished construction in a logical market will sell for land + a praction of the value of materials. That’s because most general contractors do not want the headaches and liability of finishing someone elses’ work.

 
 
Comment by finnman
2006-12-05 10:14:14

Trump dismisses talk of realty bubble (In Dubai)

http://www.gulfnews.com/business/Real_Estate_Property/10087240.html

Dubai: Donald Trump Jr, the son of American real estate tycoon Donald Trump, has dismissed talk of a bubble in Dubai’s property market.

Speaking with Gulf News on the sidelines of Dubai’s Cityscape property exhibition, Trump said a cyclical lull will hit the market where the velocity of sales drops and weak developers are weeded out.

But he said Dubai’s tax free status, its political stability and the freedom given to developers to design innovative projects will sustain investor interest.

“If you say there will be a correction long enough, eventually you’ll be right because everything is cyclical. Dubai will never always grow at 25 per cent per year,” he said.

“I’m expecting the market to re-centre, which will probably happen in two or three years, but it will affect different properties in different ways.”

“The nature of real estate is that people who were able to weather the bad times will always do well.”

In Dubai to inspect progress on the Dh2.2 billion Palm Trump International Hotel and Tower (expected to be complete in 2009) on the trunk of Palm Jumeirah, Trump said his family’s future investments will be focused on the UAE and Dubai, rather than emerging markets such as Saudi Arabia.

Comment by passthebubbly
2006-12-05 12:07:21

My sister knew the younger Donald in college (completely irrelevant here, just sayin’). He’s 28 or 29, IIRC. So he doesn’t know what a soft housing market, much less a real recession, is like. Heck, all he’s known is a housing bubble, so he has no basis for comparison.

Comment by finnman
2006-12-05 12:13:27

His father knows what a real estate crash is like.

Comment by GetStucco
2006-12-05 13:22:58

His father knows what bankruptcy is like.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by finnman
2006-12-05 13:28:29

and he knows how to grab the bankers by the balls and pump them for more $$$$

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by cute_diva
2006-12-05 10:42:50

Ha….Just got a call from a realtor (DC Metro Area)…she wanted to let me know that the market is really picking up and that I should try to buy now, before things really pick up in the Spring. Anyone see any signs of things picking up? I see the exact opposite….

Comment by Mozo Maz
2006-12-05 16:26:24

I smell a Realtor hunting for Christmas money.

Comment by cassiopeia
2006-12-05 17:27:19

I recently requested info on properties in my area from the MLS. I got one listing from one of their realtors and some basic info on financing. I wrote back to thank him and told him that the info was useful because we have never bought a house before. He wrote back saying that he would love to treat us to lunch or an early dinner. For me, this is a first…

 
 
 
Comment by Chrisinpnw
2006-12-05 11:15:47

Sorta off topic, but a VERY good read for those expecting the worse in the housing & credit bubble collapse.

http://energybulletin.net/23259.html

Comment by mina
2006-12-05 12:44:56

I read this yesterday, it’s so hilarious. summary is: government will abandon you so do yourself a favor and abandon it first.

Mina.

 
 
Comment by Poo' in OCNY
2006-12-05 11:19:53

I’m sorry. I just had to post this link for the viewers.

Having problems selling your over priced POS since last winter??? No problem! MS paint yourself in some grass and a driveway! Shazam! Like a brand new listing.

http://www.org.interealty.com/PropSearch/PropertyDetail.asp?Code=&ML=408205&AgentID=

Comment by Poo\' in OCNY
2006-12-05 11:21:24

Oh man, it just kills me, look at the snow on the roof. haha

 
Comment by finnman
2006-12-05 12:11:07

400K for that house in nowheresville.

 
 
Comment by paul
2006-12-05 11:33:22

Great Article in Barron’s this past week.

http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2006/12/is_the_housing_.html

 
Comment by Paul
2006-12-05 12:39:51

From the Wolfsblog.

Interesting post regarding inflation (10%)

and funny business at the
treasury
:

 
Comment by OB_Tom
2006-12-05 12:56:53

But I though all the Baby Boomers were going to buy a second or third home in Hawaii? PS: Notice that “experts predict a soft landing”!

http://starbulletin.com/2006/12/05/news/story01.html
“Home price climb finally over
The median declines for the first time since the boom, but experts predict a soft landing

This time last year, real estate watchers were scratching their heads wondering just how high the market could go.

Now the most popular question is, “How low can it go?”

 
Comment by Bubbly in the South Bay
2006-12-05 13:31:26

Not sure if anyone posted the report from the American Enterprise Institute about housing led recessions, Housing and American Recessions

“A weak housing sector has accompanied every American recession since 1965, but not every episode of housing weakness has accompanied a recession. An annual drop in the growth rate of residential investment (a good measure of homebuilding activity) of more than 10 percent has coincided with a recession five of the seven times it has occurred since 1965. (In 1967 and in 1995, declines in residential investment occurred without a recession.) A significant drop in residential investment therefore appears to be a necessary condition, but not a sufficient condition, for a U.S. recession.”

“Housing slowdowns tend to lead recessions rather than result from them. During the second quarter of 2006, fixed residential investment fell at an 11.1 percent annual rate, followed by a 17.4 percent rate of decline in the third quarter. The intensity of the fall in U.S. residential investment during the middle two quarters of 2006 is approaching potential recession territory.”

“Still, the chances of a recession in 2007 caused by housing weakness are probably only about one in two. Understanding how recessions result from a weaker housing sector helps to determine the odds of an upcoming recession.

Weakness in the U.S. housing sector poses the sternest test of the self-stabilizing capacity of the U.S. economy. That is the case because residential construction, although it is not a large part of the economy, can be volatile. Housing construction is like investment insofar as product must be built ahead of demand, which means that a slowdown in the demand for housing can create sharp disruptions in the housing construction industry. Because residential real estate is the major asset of most households, changes in its value can affect spending on all items. To begin with, spending on housing is tied to spending on home improvement and furnishings, so an abrupt slowdown in home building and home purchases spills over with extra intensity into those sectors of the economy.”

“Between 2000 and 2006, the value of U.S. real estate rose by about $10 trillion to a total of $22 trillion. Over the last year alone, the value of real estate on household balance sheets rose by $2 trillion. The total value of real estate at $22 trillion constitutes nearly 40 percent of household net worth. Consequently, changes in the value of housing can have substantial effects on household wealth and, in turn, can affect consumption.

Broadly speaking, if the current housing downturn were to take house prices back to their values of mid-2005, representing a drop of about $2 trillion or 10 percent of the current value of the housing stock, households would feel worse off and probably would consume less. The best estimates of the impact of housing wealth on consumption suggest that a 10 percent decline in the value of housing wealth would reduce consumption by about 0.6 percent. That, in turn, would translate to a drag of about 0.4 percentage points on overall GDP growth. The estimates of the impact of housing wealth on consumption are naturally subject to some error, but it is reasonable to assume that the impact on GDP growth from a loss of $2 trillion in housing wealth would range from, say, 0.3 percentage points to 0.5 percentage points.”

“Perhaps a more compelling reason for the recent slowdown in housing has been waning affordability. The cost of a typical home relative to disposable income per capita has gone from about 100 percent in 2000 to nearly about 140 percent today. This puts much of the housing stock out of reach for many households, despite the accommodating financing that has been available from the mortgage industry. As potential buyers hold back for lower prices, inventories of new and existing homes begin to rise and prices start to fall.”

“The last point to remember about housing and Ameri-can recessions is that no two cycles are ever the same.”

“Inflation at current levels presents the Fed with a dilemma. If it moves aggressively enough by cutting rates to revive growth promptly, than the U.S. economy would exit the current slowdown with core inflation well above the “comfort zone.” In view of that possible outcome, it is difficult to escape the conclusion that the economy needs to grow at a below-trend rate for several quarters in order to bring inflation down gradually. The Fed needs a weaker housing sector, but it cannot be too weak or recession will result.

No one ever said that avoiding recession after a housing bubble would be easy. It is not.”

 
Comment by KIA
2006-12-05 14:28:54

http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/1252006_Homebuying_Marriage.asp

The article covers problems which many unmarried partners, whether romantically involved or not, are suddenly discovering about their “investment.”

 
Comment by dagan68
2006-12-05 14:48:41

An article from the American Prospect by Dean Baker:

The Housing Crash Recession of 2007
By Dean Baker
t r u t h o u t | Columnist

Tuesday 05 December 2006

As we approach the end of 2006, the economy’s prospects for next year appear more gloomy with each new piece of economic data. And, just like President Bush in his assessment of the situation in Iraq, the economic forecasters are gradually revising their forecasts downward, as it no longer appears credible to present the rosy pictures that they had been trying to sell.

The trouble began early in the year, when the housing boom that was supposed to continue forever turned into a housing bust. The rate of house price appreciation didn’t just slow, as most economists predicted, nor did prices simply flatten in accordance with their revised predictions. House prices began to fall. Nationwide, house prices are now down between 1 percent and 2 percent from their levels at the same point in 2005. (The decline is between 4 percent and 5 percent, if we adjust for inflation.) The price declines in some of the most over-valued areas, like Washington, DC, and parts of Florida and California, have been considerably sharper.

In fact, the price declines are even larger than is shown in the data, because sellers now routinely make payments that are not captured in the contracted price, such as picking up some of the buyer’s closing costs or making repairs to the house before the sale. Such practices were unheard of a year ago.

When the downturn in the housing market could no longer be denied, the economic forecasters assured us that the rest of the economy would remain strong. They noted the strength in non-residential construction, strong investment in equipment and software, and of course the resilience of consumers.

This picture is not panning out well either. The non-residential sector experienced a short boom earlier in the year. This should not have been a surprise. The housing boom pulled resources (workers and construction materials) away from the non-residential sector. In some of the areas with the most over-heated housing markets, it wasn’t possible to get the workers needed to build stores, offices or other non-residential structures. This meant that when demand in the residential sector eased, resources could switch to meet the pent-up demand in the non-residential sector.

But, it was predictable that this boom would be short-lived. The residential sector is twice as large as the non-residential sector. And there just is not that much pent-up demand. There was serious overbuilding in the office and retail sectors in the late-90s boom, and the continued decline in manufacturing means demand for factory construction is limited. According to the most recent data, construction in the non-residential sector was already falling off by the end of the third quarter.

The boom in equipment and software investment also seems to have disappeared. The latest numbers in this sector have been negative also, suggesting that investment will be at best a very small positive in the economy in the next year.

This leaves us with our resilient consumer. The economic forecasters assure us that strong job growth, coupled with healthy wage growth and falling gas prices, will give consumers the money they need to keep spending.

Well this story does not look very good either. Job growth has actually been slowing over the course of the year, with the private sector adding less than 100,000 jobs on average for the last two months. Falling gas prices are a positive, but since no one had expected gas prices to soar to $3 a gallon, the fact that prices have fallen back to last year’s levels does not give consumers that much of a boost. Finally, we are looking at modest real wage growth (at 1 percent annually), but this is not extraordinary and not enough to provide a very large boost to demand.

The more important part of the story for consumers is that they are losing the ability to borrow against their homes. Last year, consumers pulled more than $800 billion in equity out of their homes. Many people bought their homes with little or no money down, and then borrowed against their equity as quickly as their house price rose. Now that house prices have turned down, they have no further equity against which to borrow. This means that these consumers have no choice but to curtail their consumption.

The evidence for this falloff is spreading by the day. Projections of weak holiday sales and slumping car sales top the list. Throw in the reports of rapidly rising rates of mortgage delinquencies and defaults and you get a clear picture of rapidly growing distress.

Of course, with all sources of demand showing weakness, job growth will slump further, and we’ll get our classic downward spiral: declining employment, falling income, falling consumption, and then further job loss. The story is not pretty, but unfortunately there is no way to prevent it. This downturn will be especially painful because it is associated with a crash of the housing bubble. This means both that many people will lose their life’s savings and also that the recession is likely to be longer lasting than most.

The picture would not have been so dire if economists had been better able to do their job. Unfortunately, economic forecasters seem more interested in happy talk than economic analysis. Not one of the “Blue-Chip 50″ forecasters saw the 2001 recession coming. The record seems no better this time around.

Unfortunately, no one ever holds the forecasters accountable. Even though they all missed the last recession, and just about all of them will have missed this recession, the same group will probably still be around to miss the next recession. Some workers, like dishwashers and custodians, teachers and truck drivers, have to meet performance standards. Economic forecasters apparently just have to show up to collect their paychecks.

——————————————————————————–
Dean Baker is the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR). He is the author of The Conservative Nanny State: How the Wealthy Use the Government to Stay Rich and Get Richer (www.conservativenannystate.org). He also has a blog, “Beat the Press,” where he discusses the media’s coverage of economic issues. You can find it at the American Prospect’s web site.

Comment by finnman
2006-12-05 16:47:46

I cant take anything seriously that comes from Truthout.org. Moonbat central.

Comment by miami33
2006-12-05 19:48:47

Speaking of politics, I wonder how our economy will respond to this recent development.

Iran to replace dollar with euro in foreign trade: Finance Minister
TEHRAN, Dec. 4 (Mehr News Agency) – Iran has decided to replace dollar with euro in its foreign trade given the continual impediments and hostile policies directed by U.S. toward the country, Iranian finance minister said on Monday.

According to ISNA, the would-be decision is also more attuned to existing trade volume between Iran and European nations, the country’s major economic partners, which is transacted through the ‘euro banks’. “Such inclination has been underlying part of our economic policy for awhile and our Oil Stabilization Fund (OSF) in dollar is at its lowest now,” Davud Danesh-Jafari continued.

Back in September, the head of the Central Bank of Iran (CBI) Ebrahim Sheibani had threatened that Iran would resort to dollar-to-euro conversion if the U.S. pressure continued. Moreover, the 9/11 event seemed to consolidate a tentative unanimity being formed on this matter among Iranian statesmen after the emergence of euro in 2000.

Experts believe that less reliance on dollar and conversion to euro may increase Iran’s financial flexibility and access to euro accounts would be easier if the U.S. chooses to impose a unilateral economic sanction on the country.

http://www.payvand.com/news/06/dec/1041.html

 
 
 
Comment by LA notary
2006-12-05 15:04:00

Need some help here.
I have some friends who are just dying to find a way to make money in real estate right now. They have had several hair brained ideas over the last year, none of which have worked. Their latest idea (or scam) is that they are going to do loans with another friend of theirs who is either a broker or loan officer, I’m not sure. Any way they are going to do loans for their customers every 3-6 mos and split the points and rebate with the customer. Each time they refi the same borrower, the borrower skips a payment and they say the money they split with the borrower should almost cover the rest of the payments until they refi again. They called this “reloading” I explained to them how wrong this is on so many different levels but they just see big bucks. I remember reading about this practice months ago on this blog. I seem to recall the broker mentioned in the article was in deep doo-doo for what he was doing. I can’t remember if he was in trouble with the banks or if it is illegal. Does anyone else recall?? I would love to give them some hard evidence that their participation in a scam like this can end very very badly for them.

 
Comment by Redondo_beach_Dude
2006-12-05 15:39:03

Bread and Circus.
http://www.whale.to/b/bread_q.html

Hmmm… can this be happening?

Comment by CA renter
2006-12-06 00:18:06

yes, yes and yes…

Couldn’t agree more.

 
 
Comment by kelowna_steve
2006-12-05 15:45:29

Interesting article about the LA Auto Show with references to slowing car sales due to the housing bubble.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15918559/wid/6448213/

Comment by Mozo Maz
2006-12-05 17:01:56

As new car sales go, so goes the economy. Why else would it be a large component of the “leading” indicators?

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post