December 15, 2006

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For December 15, 2006

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

109 Comments »

Comment by jmf
2006-12-15 04:50:30

“drowning tools” plus some more subprime news

http://www.immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/

have a nice weekend

Comment by CA renter
2006-12-15 07:52:27

Have a nice weekend, jmf! :)

 
Comment by scdave
2006-12-15 08:45:44

NICE post jmf….

 
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2006-12-15 09:13:33

Thanks jmf,
Great ‘toons and love that chart on construction.

 
 
Comment by John Fleming
2006-12-15 05:08:41

Empty your wallets now!

“Did you folks see that the US Mint has outlawed the melting or export of pennies and nickels — which are now all worth more as metal than their face values?

“In fact, you can now go to jail for up to 5 years and receive up to a $10,000 penalty for leaving the United States with more than $5 of these coins on your person. I’m not kidding.”

Banning or not, this certainly makes it difficult to hide inflation.”

Aaron Krown in comment on Roubinis blog

http://www.autodogmatic.com/index.php/sst/2006/12/14/us_mint_criminalizes_melting_pennies_and

Comment by CA renter
2006-12-15 07:57:21

I wonder if their enforcement of these new coinage rules will be stricter than their enforcement of mortgage lending “regulations”…

Things that make you go hmmmm…

 
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2006-12-15 09:35:48

“We are taking this action because the Nation needs its coinage for commerce,” said Director Ed Moy. “We don’t want to see our pennies and nickels melted down so a few individuals can take advantage of the American taxpayer. Replacing these coins would be an enormous cost to taxpayers.”

Old Chinese saying: The high rests upon the low

So, if ONE house is over-appraised at $150,000 thousand Dollars…then how many pennies…
Wait, the Government is concerned about pursuing criminals that perform what type of crime?
Now, I know why the Amish bury their money…it’s a form of free investment that appreciates over time.

 
Comment by finnman
2006-12-15 11:05:36

If they have to ban the melting of pennies, I expect to seea ten fold increase in stealing/stripping copper wiring from homes.

Comment by txchick57
2006-12-15 12:45:49

Copper’s at an interesting buy area here for speculation with a stop.

 
 
 
Comment by Sic Semper Realtor
2006-12-15 05:29:26

Not sure if this got posted last night - Kendra Todd (the idiot who “won” The Apprentice and now has her own Yahoo column has a piece up about how we’re all stupid and great places like Iowa City are ready to explode. I’m not sure how to put up a link right now, but if you go to Yahoo, then Real Estate, it should be the featured column.

The lead flavored Kool-Aid is my favorite….

Comment by flatffplan
2006-12-15 06:14:32

hehehhehe
she got the fl mansion RE-do
better torch it

 
Comment by finnman
2006-12-15 06:28:08

http://realestate.yahoo.com/Real_estate_news/columnist/kendra_todd/Best_Places_to_Buy_a_Home.html

Best Places in the U.S. to Buy a Home
By Kendra Todd
November 11, 2006
While the alarmists continue to jabber on about a real estate bubble, the fact is that real estate is regional, not national. That means while many overpriced markets are cooling off, others are poised to take off in the next two to three years. In this column, we’re going to look at some of the most promising places to buy a home in the U.S.

What’s Best, Anyway?
Of course, everyone’s idea of the best place to buy a home varies. For some people, an area close to family is good, no matter what else is going on. For others, it’s all about climate. But for smart real estate investing, these are the criteria I’m looking at:

A strong trend toward appreciation. You want to be able to buy a home for a reasonable price and have it increase in value for years.
A strong local economy. Areas that fit the economic profile tend to have good job growth and new businesses moving to the area.
A “wow” factor that attracts people. It could be weather, scenery, outdoor recreation or even a conservative or liberal reputation.
Solid in-migration to the area. People should be relocating to the region in a regular stream.

You want a market that offers something that speaks to you emotionally, affordable housing that will go up in value, and the promise of good jobs, which means a strong tax base and quality services. What are some of those markets? Let’s take a look.

My Best Places
Generally speaking the high-opportunity markets are the smaller municipal regions that have remained below the real estate speculators’ radar-smaller cities that are self-contained, tend to be filled with history, aren’t full of big box retailers and strip malls, and often have the arts or a university underpinning their economies.

Iowa City, Iowa - This town of 131,000, home to the University of Iowa, is expected to see its home values increase 2.4% by mid-2007, according to a forecast from Fiserv CSW and Moody’s Economy.com published in Money magazine. That’s a small increase, but when you add the other factors-very low unemployment rate of 2.2%, housing prices that are quite low for a college town, and the numerous cultural, sports and educational opportunities that come with living in a university community-this city is a winner.
Lewiston, Idaho - This small city of 57,000 is yet another spot in Idaho where housing values have yet to catch up with the popularity of the open spaces, scenery, and recreational potential. Lewiston is projected to enjoy 6.2% appreciation in home prices by June 2007, and enjoys low unemployment and a very low crime rate. Added to the popularity of Idaho in general, this is a great market for people who can take the cold weather.
Olympia, Washington - This city of 44,000 at the tip of Puget Sound boasts several factors that make it a wonderful market: an unspoiled environment, a healthy economy with an unemployment rate hovering around 4%, and best of all, one of the best projected appreciation rates in the country, 13% by June 2007. In fact, most areas of Washington state appear poised for a boom in real estate prices, as Spokane, Mount Vernon, Yakima and several other areas are also among the top projected gainers.
Spokane, Washington - This large eastern Washington city of 191,000 does suffer from a higher than average crime rate and a higher unemployment rate than I like, but it has huge potential due to its thriving university culture and its wonderful climate. A variety of factors have contributed to its projected appreciate rate of 12.4% from now to June 2007.
Panama City, Florida - Much of Florida is overbuilt and in a state of price decline. Panama City, a town of 37,00 on the panhandle, is a robust exception. In fact, it boasts the highest projection of one-year appreciation from Fiserv CSW and Moody’s Economy.com, 21%, and a low unemployment rate of 3.2%. It does have a crime rate nearly double the national average, but if you can get past that, you can grab a property that will create tremendous wealth.
Tucson, Arizona - The largest city on this list with more than 512,000 residents, Tucson is the antidote to the overheated Phoenix/Scottsdale market. With a projected appreciation of 5.7% and an average three-bedroom home price of about $211,000, this city offers the option of living in the warm, dry Arizona climate for a very affordable cost. I think Tucson will be one of the hottest markets in the next five years.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2006-12-15 06:53:01

I beg to disagree with her on Tucson. Housing prices vs. local incomes? Way, way, WAY out of whack. Which means that a lot of houses are just sitting there, with their “For Sale” signs flapping in the desert winds.

And those better paying jobs that the city fathers keep telling us will come here? Well, we’re still waiting for that to happen.

 
Comment by pressboardbox
2006-12-15 07:19:26

Just two months ago this Kendra Todd twit wrote an article that there is no bubble - “bubbles are for tubs, silly” or some inane twit-like expression was stated by Todd. My take is that this “real estate whiz-kid” is up to her ass in RE investments, probably concentrated in south florida which is the worst market. She is scared to death and doing all that she knows how to do to help herself. I hope she goes down in flames and crawls back underneath the same rock from which she wormed free.

Comment by txchick57
2006-12-15 07:38:50

Las Vegas condos too, if I recall correctly.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Pete
2006-12-15 10:43:11

Housing prices in most of the country are way above historical appreciation norms. Impartial analysts have put together data that clearly shows a housing bubble that will come crashing down soon, and already is in some areas. I suppose we should put all of this aside and start buying property when confronted with such profound market analysis as “bubbles are for bathtubs”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Moman
2006-12-15 07:28:52

2.7% increase, WOW, that is worth investing in.

Better off putting the money in a passbook savings account and getting 3% and a lot less hassle.

Comment by paladin
2006-12-15 09:00:54

particularly considering 2.7% would not cover your transaction costs…………

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by dannll
2006-12-15 08:05:58

Idiot.
Notice all the “Projected” growth. Like the projected 15% that Watts put in the bag for the OC.
Now the next question is what the hell am I going to do in Lewiston ID? Or Spokane? Can everyone just pick up and leave their jobs to go to these projected hot markets? Or is she only writing for RE speculators? Of course she did win on The Donald’s show and we know what a great RE guru he is.
Start packing, Honey, we’re moving to Iowa…

Comment by Matt_In_Tx
2006-12-15 18:09:31

I’m from Spokane. “It’s a good place to be FROM”, I always say ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by zeropointzero
2006-12-15 08:26:15

Kendra - it may be true that in many ways real estate markets differ on regional/local levels. No doubt rust-belt or auto-industry dependant economies (or any other city/area that loses a lot of jobs) will have a different market than an area with a solid or growing economy.

However - when you consider the prime movers of the real estate bubble:

1) Loose money, exotic financing and lower documentation loans.
2) A herd mentality that prices were going to rise forever — buy now or get priced out

These are national — not regional — conditions.

There may indeed be towns/areas that suffer less than others — but I would investigate areas with the lowest proportion of investor sales the last five years, the lowest proportion of exotic financing and the smallest number of new units completed or in construction in recent years per capita. Screen that against decent financial job prospects, and you’ve you’ll find the best generic real estate markets in my opinion.

 
Comment by arroyogrande
2006-12-15 09:48:26

From Kendra’s “What to Do When a Market Cools”:

“Well, what was for some time touted as the “bursting of the real estate bubble” appears to have become a soft landing for the real estate market. In most markets around the country, prices are dropping but they’re not plummeting. Homeowners with years’ worth of equity will still hold onto much of that equity, and buyers are finding that they have a chance to buy a home again. In the business, we call this a “correction.” It’s normal and even desirable.”

“Tips for Buyers in a Cooling Market

1. Now is the time to buy! So stick to your price and play hard to get…

2. Now’s the time to jump back on board the wagon for pre-foreclosures, foreclosure properties and distressed home sales…

3. If you’re an investor, target markets where speculation has run rampant over the past few years while also focusing on markets that are likely to boom in the next few years…”

Catch a falling knife and put it in your pocket, save it for a rainy day…

 
Comment by arroyogrande
2006-12-15 09:50:14

Also realize that Kendra is a RE broker:

http://myhousere.netreal.net/

 
Comment by marksparky
2006-12-15 12:33:58

This is funny, since Olympia is one of the few towns in western Washington that’s already showing the wear and tear of a burst bubble. There was serious investor rental property speculation the last few years by fixer-upper types who were priced out of the rental market in the Tacoma and Seattle areas.

 
Comment by Army No Va
2006-12-15 15:44:17

This is a good indicator to get out of these markets when someone like this touts them.

 
 
 
Comment by txchicK57
2006-12-15 05:34:04

Someone should email this loser and offer a dime. LOL

http://dallas.craigslist.org/for/249262851.html

Comment by Lou Minatti
2006-12-15 05:44:30

TxChic, you should see the selection on eBay!

 
Comment by crispy&cole
2006-12-15 05:48:44

Has the Silver, Gold and Bronze Edition.

I wonder which one Casey purchased?

Comment by arizonadude
2006-12-15 06:51:24

Probably all of them.

 
 
Comment by AZgolfer
2006-12-15 07:01:19

Txchick

Did you say something yesterday about an invester buying 5 billion in S & P puts?

Comment by txchick57
2006-12-15 07:39:58

S&P futures when it crossed 1425 which is an option strike with large open interest. It’s over that now, let’s see how the afternoon shakes out and Monday morning.

 
 
Comment by Pete
2006-12-15 10:51:44

The post is already flagged and removed. I assume it was an attempt to sell some sort of “get rich in real estate” crap.

 
 
Comment by Penina
2006-12-15 05:37:43

To all my fellow South-West Floridians, especially from the Sarasota area, or any other interested housing-realist with a sharp pen.

Michael Saunders & Company, arguably the biggest residential realtor in the area, has rolled out a fancy blog to “discuss” issues as they relate to the South-West Florida housing market.

The blog roll-out was announced this week in the Herald-Tribune and of course is really not interested in “discussion”, but rather in becoming another real-estate propaganda tool full of misinformation and hype.

I’d like to invite you all to visit the blog and weigh in with some housing market realities to help properly inform the readers they are trying to mislead. It will be interesting to see how ready Saunders is for articulate opinions and facts that strongly oppose their ludicrous and asinine predictions and assertions.

Their latest entry is: “It’s a great time to buy.”

The blog can be found at:
http://www.thesaundersblog.com

Comment by Sean_From_NVA
2006-12-15 05:45:25

This is what it blogged on that site.

“It is not a go time to buy. If you buy right now with a toxic loan you will be screwed when the ARM is reset, because you took out a 100% loan at a sub-prime rate. Wake up people and smell the turning of the market. There is nobody left to buy up the houses.”

Comment by Sean_From_NVA
2006-12-15 05:47:15

Sorry for miss spelled good. put go instead of good.

sorry

Comment by garcap
2006-12-15 08:42:00

You misspelled “misspelled”, too. :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Calm bfor the storm
2006-12-15 05:47:01

My answer might surprise you. To put it simply, there’s NEVER been a bad time to buy in Sarasota.

Sure surprised me. Must be different in Sarasota.

 
Comment by BigDaddy63
2006-12-15 06:27:01

Ugh.. that site makes me puke. Nothing but trolls and Realtors sucking up. I left a message but I doubt it will get posted.

Comment by txchick57
2006-12-15 06:43:37

Some Dallas idiot started one like that too. Spammed it everywhere. I posted some things. They never made it on.

Comment by david cee
2006-12-15 07:21:31

From the Sarasota Real Estate Blog….

“Ps A few years ago in Annapolis Maryland a friend that
owned car dealerships, got together with other owners
of car dealerships, they went to the local newspapers
and threaten to pull of their adds off if the papers
continued to write negative articles about their industry.
Guess what happened? the newspapers stopped… ”

I guess control of the press is really the fundamental right of the real estate industry, because they are different. Why isn’t Bill Oreilly and Fox News protecting the “little guy” by pounding away at the real state fraudsters? He is always on the MSM case for unfair and unbalance news spinning.
Maybe Gekko is one of his premium members and forward a request to cover this on his show?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mike
2006-12-15 07:58:31

Media people like Bill O’Reilly or Chris Matthews or Rush Limbaugh or Brian Williams or the financial clowns on CNBC’s financial network, all own expensive property. Sometimes two. One as their main residence and another close to the studios where they work. Their tax advisor tells them to buy the biggest because of the tax advantages. I doubt very much if we will ever hear this group exposing the real level of fraud and corruption which has taken place. How would you like to see that New York penthouse you bought for $3 million drop back to $1 million?

 
 
Comment by david cee
2006-12-15 07:21:31

From the Sarasota Real Estate Blog….

“Ps A few years ago in Annapolis Maryland a friend that
owned car dealerships, got together with other owners
of car dealerships, they went to the local newspapers
and threaten to pull of their adds off if the papers
continued to write negative articles about their industry.
Guess what happened? the newspapers stopped… ”

I guess control of the press is really the fundamental right of the real estate industry, because they are different. Why isn’t Bill Oreilly and Fox News protecting the “little guy” by pounding away at the real state fraudsters? He is always on the MSM case for unfair and unbalance news spinning.
Maybe Gekko is one of his premium members and forward a request to cover this on his show?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by OutofSanDiego
2006-12-15 07:00:30

What a B.S. blog. I wrote a nice entry and the response when I tried to post it was, “Awaiting Moderation”. I bet there is no way they will post my “realistic” views on the current market and that now is NOT a good time to buy. They will moderate only the entries that match their views on to their blog.

 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2006-12-15 07:23:11

Here’s what I wrote to that blog. I intentionally kept it pretty tame. It will be interesting to see if they post it.

“We left Sarasota in the summer of 2005. Didn’t want to deal with the eventual hurricane. Talked to a former associate last week who said we picked the right time to leave, as prices “are down about 20% in the last year.” So if you think the decline is about over, then now is a good time to buy. Just check what your property insurance and tax bills are going to be. And sell your other house first. Carrying two mortgages for any length of time can be hazardous to your financial health.”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2006-12-15 07:28:29

I can speak from personal experience on the dual mortgage = health hazard problem. Not my own experience, mind you, but that of a couple of nearby neighbors.

Seems that they decided that this neighborhood was not to their liking, so they bought another house nearby. However, they have yet to sell the house over here, and guess what? Their now-empty house is competing with three other empties on the same street. And there are PLENTY more empties in this area.

Any-hoo, a friend and I were driving past their house yesterday, and we saw a moving van out front. We were headed to a holiday party, and our talk en route changed to the train wreck that we think my now-former neighbors are headed toward.

To think that just two short years ago, I looked up to this couple as role models. Particularly in the area of real estate. Believe me, my mind has done a 180 on that notion.

Comment by Mike
2006-12-15 07:47:28

No problem. Just wait until spring. These empty properties weill be flying off the shelf!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2006-12-15 08:04:48

Mike, hate to break the news to ya, but this very topic during a Thanksgiving conversation with a friend who lives across the street from (the now departed) Mr. Doom and Mrs. Gloom. My friend insisted that what was currently happening in real estate was just a little blip, and that things would turn up in the spring.

Well, it so happens that my friend has been dealing with the same real estate agency whose sign is in front of Mr. Doom and Mrs. Gloom’s now empty house. So, I’ll lay you dollars to donuts that said agency was the source of the “little blip” remark. (Not that I said anything about this theory to my friend. After all, I do want to keep her as a friend.)

But, as gently as I could, I tried to lay out the REALITY of the present market, and explained that next spring would not be a time for miraculous recovery. It took us years to get into this mess. It will take years to get out of it.

As for Mr. Doom and Mrs. Gloom, I don’t bring up that subject. My friend does, and believe you me, I really have to keep The Troublemaker (my mouth) under control.

 
 
 
Comment by saywhat?
2006-12-15 08:05:04

Re: Bill in Carolina post on saundersblog
They did post it

 
 
Comment by dawnal
2006-12-15 07:39:53

I posted at http://www.thesaundersblog.com. Let’s see if it runs or if it disappears.

 
Comment by jag
2006-12-15 09:16:33

Saunder’s “argument” for buying is content free and emotion full.

Don’t let facts stand in your way of leveraging yourself to oblivian. Trust your “instincts” and buy, buy, buy or else “Bye, Bye, Bye” my business………….

 
Comment by Les Pendens
2006-12-15 11:02:35

Here’s my reply to the Asshat Realtor from Sarasota:

“Only an idiot would buy Real Estate in Sarasota right now.

Simple back-of-the-envelope math using traditional lending practices ( 10-20% down 30yr FICO above 650 ) does NOT pencil out. Just who, based upon the MEDIAN income for the area, can afford to live here without shoehorning themselves into a toxic load product that will see payments increase over time ?

Get real. This thing, just like the 1926 Florida Bust, will come back to earth. If you bought in 2004-2006 and hope to flip you are TOAST.

Flippers in Southwest Florida are now Bagholders and will be financially pounded into a fine dust if they expect to receive their wishing prices.

Anyhow, changes are coming to a town near you; no matter where you live. Don’t delude yourself into thinking that “You can always refi”…especially now that the flippers and specuvestors are streaming towards the exits and this false-demand-based, rapid, unsustainable appreciation is crashing back down to earth…..banks will tighten up lending once the toxic ARM’s reset in 2007 and the house you bought in 2004-2006 won’t be worth what you paid for it. Try bring $ 10,000’s of dollars to the closing table if you expect to sell or refi.

Good luck Realtors. Your profession is due for some startling, painful and abrupt changes.”

Certainly that will never get posted to his cute, happytalking, informative little blog.

We’ll see.

Comment by Les Pendens
2006-12-15 11:11:11

Nope.

Smug little Realtor(tm) Assclown deleted my post from his “warm-and-fuzzy” Sarasota Realtor blog.

 
 
 
Comment by MazNJ
2006-12-15 05:43:06

Unfortunately I could not read the blog yesterday so someone may have posted this already from CNN but…

Scraping by on $150,000 a year
The Schuetts have an enviable income. So why are they having a hard time making ends meet? Plus: How you can do better.

http://money.cnn.com/2006/12/13/magazines/moneymag/scraping_by.moneymag/index.htm?postversion=2006121411

They spend most of the article talking about how they can’t make ends meet and live outside Omaha and have an affordable home and don’t eat out and don’t contribute to their 401K or a college fund for their kids and oh they cut out all the expenses to the point they’re considering dropping their unlisted phone # to save $3 a month blah blah blah blah blah and then they casually drop the bomb:

A closer look at the Schuetts’ finances reveals, for example, that a big chunk of their income is eaten up by two rental properties. Brian purchased them thinking they’d generate extra income, but he has yet to find tenants. Even when the properties are finally occupied, the area’s softening rental market probably won’t allow them to make enough to cover carrying costs.

Meanwhile, the two houses are expected to appreciate only about 3 percent a year - the couple can do better than that with Treasuries (bonds, at least, will never need expensive new wiring).

But the Schuetts haven’t had a heart-to-heart about selling the properties yet because Brian has been so keen on making them work. “Our strategy has been to practice ‘avoidance,’” says Amy. “But you don’t have to be a psychiatrist to see that.”

2006-12-15 06:52:38

Sure you can nominally do better than 3% with treasuries, but appreciation is HUGELY leveraged with a mortgage where practically no money controls several hundread thousands of dollars. I don’t agree with the 3%, but the article is simple wrong on that simple math.

Comment by crash1
2006-12-15 08:21:03

Don’t forget about all those pesky taxes and maintenance costs.

 
 
Comment by txchick57
2006-12-15 07:02:52

And of course, the 4 kids and all that goes with that. Whatever. You can like like a king in Nebraska with that income.

 
Comment by Troy
2006-12-15 09:14:50

As a Georgist who thinks buy-to-let of SFH is a horrendous social injustice, I am mildly gleeful reading that.

 
 
Comment by essessemm
 
Comment by pressboardbox
2006-12-15 05:50:35

I thought Joe Kernan was going to rub one out on camera this am on CNBC when the CPI numbers came out. Should be a great day for Cramer…

Comment by flatffplan
2006-12-15 06:15:49

ecpt oils over 62
cpi low showing labor arbitrage

 
Comment by txchick57
2006-12-15 06:44:17

Good day for people long Dec. 1425 calls anyway. Jesus, get this over already!

Comment by chilidoggg
2006-12-15 09:04:12

it’s over.

i’ve capitulated.

all in.

 
 
 
Comment by Army No. Va.
2006-12-15 06:02:44

The new holiday Master Card commercial where they list things and say $x dollars and then something priceless is out. One of the items - a new house - $0 !!!! Where?!?

 
Comment by BillyBob
2006-12-15 06:19:21

Good article about Realtors telling the State to shove it:

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/real_estate/article/0,1299,DRMN_414_5212209,00.html

Metrolist balks at letting state see home-sale data
Files sought to fight fraud; Realtor group insists on subpoena

Erin Toll thinks inflated appraisals are contributing to foreclosures.

By John Rebchook, Rocky Mountain News
December 14, 2006

Colorado Division of Real Estate Director Erin Toll wants Metrolist data on Denver-area home sales as part of her effort to tackle appraisal fraud, but Metrolist doesn’t plan to just hand it over.

Metrolist, owned by local Realtor groups, wants Toll to file subpoenas or get court orders, instead of letting her join the organization to obtain the information.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2006-12-15 07:30:40

I say, “Erin, go for that subpoena and/or court order. Do it with gusto.”

Don’t worry about the REIC mortar fire, Erin. We on the HBB have your back.

 
Comment by Mike
2006-12-15 07:43:36

At last someone in government, even if it is local government it’s a start, has suddenly realized that the foul stench around real estate which has been getting stronger with each passing year, is corruption. However, how dare the government ask the real estate whores to show them their books just to make sure there has been no sheenanigans. After all, there’s no point in upsetting the thousands fb’s who got suckered into buying way overpriced property because of corrupt practises by those in the real estate industry.

Hopefully, this story will get around and a light bulb will go on in several state attorney’s brains. It could have “legs” and gather momentum because revealing the massive corruption and fraud which has gone on in the real estate and mortgage industry is a win-win scenario for any ambitious Elliot Spitzer style state attorney.

Truth is, I’m fully expecting to see our prisons releasing minor offenders in the next few years to make room for corrupt mortgage brokers and fast talking hype realtors.

 
Comment by Hoz
2006-12-15 09:31:15

IMHO this is pure crap. Sure there is fraudulent appraisals out there, but blaming the increasing foreclosures on an appraisal appears to make no sense. Did the appraisers review the loan applications, the verification of employment, the income? The lender reviewed these items and decided that the borrower could afford a house of this much. This is more CYA BS, where was Erin Toll in the runup?

 
Comment by JP
2006-12-15 10:22:15

but Metrolist doesn’t plan to just hand it over.

It’s a friggin spreadsheet. What are you hiding? Go get the supoena.

 
 
Comment by KarenGA
2006-12-15 07:02:33

My apologies if this has already been posted.

If anyone feels like appraising creatively, have at it.

http://fortmyers.craigslist.org/sls/244683527.html

Comment by arizonadude
2006-12-15 07:28:52

What a joke. I’m sure he will find some darelict though.

 
 
Comment by Russ Winter
2006-12-15 07:09:56

Take the Blue Pill, Take the Red Pill:
http://wallstreetexaminer.com/blogs/winter/?p=191#more-191

 
Comment by Gwynster
2006-12-15 07:23:07

The rental listings in the Sacramento seem to be going crazy.
http://sacramento.craigslist.org/apa/248484505.html
3900 sqft for $2,200.00 comes to $56 a sqft. I’m seeing deals like this all through the newest development. Maybe ww will get back to $100 sqft again if the rental rares are any indication.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2006-12-15 07:31:16

Flaky reasoning. The annual rent equates to over $600 a square foot. Someone could use that to argue that houses are underpriced.

The comparison must be between selling price and monthly rent. Any ratio over 200:1 means housing is overpriced. Under 100:1 means it’s underpriced.

Comment by chilidoggg
2006-12-15 09:07:24

you figure 199:1 isn’t overpriced? are you factoring 30 year mortgage rates at 1% for the next 40 years?

 
 
Comment by passthebubbly
2006-12-15 13:31:11

Huh?? That’s 56 CENTS per ft^2 per month, or $6.75 per year.

 
 
Comment by crash1
2006-12-15 07:38:19

Last month, Larimer County, Colorado voters defeated a four-year, $75 million prison expansion proposal that would have been funded by property taxes, according to Builder Magazine. As a result, the county commissioners are considering implementation of an impact fee for new home construction to fund a jail expansion. According to the commissioners, lot development is a drain on community services and new homeowners don’t pay their fair share. The Homebuilders Association of Northern Colorado says impact fees on a new $200,000 home are already in excess of $20,000, so when county officials discussed an impact fee to offset the cost of jail expansion, the builders cried foul, especially when the county claimed that part of the need for new prisons was caused by new development. The National Association of Homebuilders Paul Emrath says the FBI’s crime reporting system and the victimization survey conducted by the Justice Department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics do not collect information on the age of homes where crimes occur. This lack of data makes it difficult to tie new development to increased crime. Although a prison impact fee would never raise the multimillion dollars required for a substantial project, the sentiment among county officials is that new homeowners would at least pay a portion toward the construction of new prisons, especially at a time when the county is facing a meth epidemic. The county will conduct a study to determine how much such a fee would be.

 
Comment by jmunnie
2006-12-15 07:38:22

Who Americans Are and What They Do

“The abstract reveals that the floor space in new private one-family homes has expanded to 2,227 square feet in 2005 from 1,905 square feet in 1990. Americans are getting fatter, but now drink more bottled water per person than beer.” [...]

“From 2000 to 2005, the number of manufacturing jobs declined nearly 18 percent. Virtually every job category registered decreases except pharmaceuticals. Employment in textile mills fell by 42 percent. The job projected to grow the fastest by 2014 is home health aide.”[...]

“More than half of American households owned stocks and mutual funds in 2005. The 91 million individuals in those households had a median age of 51 and a median household income of $65,000.

“That might help explain a shift in what college freshmen described as their primary personal objectives. In 1970, 79 percent said their goal was developing a meaningful philosophy of life. By 2005, 75 percent said their primary objective was to be financially very well off.”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2006-12-15 08:08:29

OTOH, the economy of the early 1970s was one when a college grad could still expect his/her sheepskin to be a ticket to a good job at a big company. And, decades down the road, he/she could expect to retire from that company with a pension.

Much has happened since then. And I think that the events of the last 30-or-so years have much to do with the increased focus on being well off. Big education, big companies, and big government are obviously not going to do it for us. We have to do it for ourselves.

Comment by chilidoggg
2006-12-15 09:12:42

I was in Waikiki in 1990 and recall these drop-dead Heather Locklear lookalike prostitutes chasing down Japanese men on the street.

Comment by rms
2006-12-15 11:50:43

“I was in Waikiki in 1990 and recall these drop-dead…”

Drop-dead gorgeous?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by CA renter
2006-12-15 09:13:01

Very true, AZ slim.

 
 
Comment by chilidoggg
2006-12-15 09:15:52

“More than half of American households owned stocks and mutual funds in 2005. The 91 million individuals in those households had a median age of 51 and a median household income of $65,000.

See? The preferential tax treatment of capital gains and dividends benefits half of us!

 
 
Comment by JB
2006-12-15 07:41:25

Anyone have first hand observations on Dade-County / South Florida condo market? Overseas investors still bying? Condos in the pipeline still expected to rollout. Any talk of autioning units by developers?

Comment by Chelle
2006-12-15 09:36:08

You really want to live down there? There’s an average of one person per day being shot. Dude, look elsewhere. Your life may depend on it.

Comment by JB
2006-12-15 11:50:51

Nope… Just want to know the market condition. FYI when South Florida (East) crashes it will be the burst in the bubble.
Here are the numbers: http://statspak.firstamericanmls.com/RAMDCStat/

 
Comment by Mark
2006-12-15 11:52:04

Which ethnic groups are doing most or all of the shooting?

 
Comment by JB
2006-12-15 11:52:31

Nope… Just want to know the market condition. FYI when South Florida (East Miami/Ft lauderdale) crashes it will be the burst in the bubble.
Here are the numbers, see listings vrs sales for each city all 100+: http://statspak.firstamericanmls.com/RAMDCStat/

 
 
Comment by finnman
2006-12-15 11:24:37

Here’s an “all is well” diary article from a miami condo inverstor/buyer. She thinks she’s lucky though you can see the fear in her grin.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/12142006/realestate/baby__youre_the_one_realestate_suzy_buckley.htm

December 14, 2006 — Count me among the lucky group of buyer-investors who cashed in on the wave of Miami’s lucrative preconstruction craze. I wasn’t one of the risk-taking visionaries who made big money investing and flipping in the late ’90s and early ’00s. Somebody just dragged me to a condo-sales launch party in 2003, where I had a few cocktails and chicken satays and got caught up in the hoopla.

Everybody in town seemed to be at the party for One Miami, The Related Group of Florida’s project in then-deserted downtown Miami, just north of Brickell Avenue.

“Did you buy here?” I remember asking a broker friend at the party who had already made a fortune buying and selling units in Related projects (Yacht Club at Portofino, Murano, et al.) in South Beach’s South of Fifth area.

“Of course, are you kidding?” he replied. “I already bought three and [my girlfriend] bought two.”

The girlfriend nodded, adding, “And my mom’s buying one.”

At that time, one- and two-bedroom preconstruction prices at One Miami (approximately $250,000 to $350,000) were comparable to those at some completed luxury buildings in Miami Beach, like the one I lived in then. But the emerging downtown intrigued me, and - judging from my friends’ success stories and the rapidly escalating prices of this particular developer’s completed projects - I knew it was a good moment to buy.

But everyone’s doing it! Even my mom! You can’t lose!
———————————————–

In January 2006, I closed on my $324,000, 1,105-square-foot two-bedroom, two-bathroom unit with a balcony on a high floor of the building’s East Tower, directly on the water, and moved in.

Although an appraiser valued my unit at $609,000 at closing a year ago, here’s today’s market reality: At press time, the lowest price of a one-bedroom, one-bath unit in my tower is currently $349,000, while the lowest 2/2 is on the market at $499,000. Also for sale: a 1/1 listed at $525,000 and a 2/2 listed at $730,000. I added wood floors and ordered $15,000 in finishes. So conservatively, I’m confident my particular unit has at least $200,000 in equity.

$15,000 of improvements = $200,000 gain! I want some of that stuff you’re smoking!
———————————————————————

A few months ago, the thought of walking away with more than $200,000 enticed me to put my unit on the market for $550,000. I don’t need to sell: I’m locked into a great interest rate and - more important - I bought at a phenomenal preconstruction price.

But I see this market as an opportunity to trade up. If I sell my unit, I could put 40 percent down on a larger condo on Miami Beach or in downtown Miami that’s selling for $700,000 and - after considering the new taxes and maintenance fees - end up with monthly payments just marginally higher than I have now.

I’ve thought about it and don’t mind rolling my profits into somebody else’s bubble. I’m going to live somewhere long-term, so why not buy a bigger, better place and capitalize on the still-attractive long-term interest rate?

Knowing when to walk away from the blackjack table is the most important part of gambling. Greed is a powerful narcotic.
—————————————————————————–

Prices throughout Miami are grinding to a halt, although I haven’t seen any of the so-called bargain-basement deals everyone’s been talking about showing up on the MLS. I think price points have a lot to do with it. Common sense says investors carrying a $5,000-a-month mortgage on a $700,000 condo will have a harder time renting their unit to cover costs than those with a $2,500 mortgage for a $350,000 condo.

Bottom line: I’m not the least bit worried. Although my agent showed my unit only a couple times when I first listed it in September, he showed it three times in two days two weeks ago. I’m getting lots of lookers; lots of wait-and-seers. I’m OK with living here long-term, and I put my place on MLS as much out of curiosity as anything else - as I assume many people who purchased at One Miami have.

Meanwhile, I receive calls regularly from agents reminding me that the larger condos I’ve looked at are still on the market, if and when I’m interested in making a move.

Yes, the market has slowed, but no, it doesn’t feel like it’s evaporated. Statistics from University of Florida’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research say that nearly 1,000 more people move to Florida each day than leave. Those people have to live somewhere, and I’m betting the average person is more likely to buy a brand-new 2/2 $550,000 condo in the heart of Miami than one of the many $1 million-plus condos on the market everywhere from Coral Gables to Aventura.

Sure, there are market gluts: Certain categories of inventory (non-waterfront in the $700,000-plus price range, for one) don’t seem to be moving. But those of us who took advantage of low purchase prices several years ago can afford to ride out the alleged storm from the balconies of our brand-new, waterfront high-rise homes.

Why am I sensing so much apprehension? Ya gotta love the brokers laying out the baitline to reel in a big fish on a bigger ane even more overpriced condo! BTW honey, people are not moving to Miami to live in condos like yours. they rather live in stucco boxes.

Comment by JB
2006-12-16 07:55:21

Thanks that was good!

 
 
 
Comment by Hoz
2006-12-15 07:52:42

“China and the United States agreed on Friday that Beijing will pursue currency flexibility, while Washington will aim to increase national savings as part of joint efforts to reduce global economic imbalances….But China is not ready to be a punching bag.

A day after Wu questioned Americans’ “limited knowledge” of China’s efforts to give market forces greater sway over the economy, the People’s Daily, the official paper of the ruling Communist Party, said the United States had China to thank for a long period of low inflation.

“Without trade with China, since the 1990s the United States would never have experienced a long-term absence of inflationary growth unprecedented in its history,” a commentary in the paper’s overseas edition said. ..”
http://tinyurl.com/ygwhmc
China daily Dec 15 2006
Historically to get national savings interest rates were raised.

Comment by chilidoggg
2006-12-15 09:18:57

We enjoyed a terrific ong period of low inflation in the 1930’s, too.

 
 
Comment by winjr
2006-12-15 07:55:03

VIX looking for a record low close today, at 9.61 as I type. No Fear!

 
Comment by Hoz
2006-12-15 08:05:38

Black & Decker shares dropped the most in three years. Earnings per share for the year will be $6.50, down from an October forecast of as much as $7.05, the Towson, Maryland-based company said today in a statement.

Fourth-quarter sales will probably decline 8 percent because of a slowing U.S. housing market and falling demand for goods such as power saws. Stanley Works, the world’s biggest maker of screwdrivers and hammers, cut its sales forecast October 24.

“It’s spreading, and we don’t know how far and how wide it’s going to spread,” said Marvin Roffman, president of Roffman Miller Associates in Philadelphia, which manages $390 million, including Black & Decker shares. “Be prepared for more disappointment from Black & Decker and others.”
Bloomberg
http://tinyurl.com/yg5lxp

 
Comment by Hoz
2006-12-15 08:21:47

From Australia
Balancing the bouncing bubble
December 16, 2006

Monetary policy has evolved with each new economic challenge, and will change again, writes Ian Macfarlane.
…Even if the central bank was confident that a destabilising bubble was forming, and that its bursting would be extremely damaging, the community would not necessarily know that this was in prospect, and could not know until the whole episode had been allowed to play itself out. If the central bank went ahead and raised interest rates, it would be accused of risking a recession to avoid something that it was worried about, but the community was not. If in the most favourable case, the central bank raised interest rates by a modest amount and prevented the bubble from expanding to a dangerous level, and it did so at a relatively small cost in terms of income and employment growth forgone, would it get any thanks? Almost certainly not, as the public would see only the short-term cost to output and employment (and probably some undershoot of the inflation target) and would not be aware of the boom and bust in asset prices that had been avoided. In all probability, the episode would be regarded by the public as an error of monetary policy because what might have happened could never be observed….
…No one is very good at picking the next major epoch, and we mainly react after the damage has been done. I am influenced by the fact that as the great inflation of the 1970s was building from the mid-1960s, no one, including the central bank, had a mandate to prevent it. As we struggled to come to grips with it, governments made decisions that effectively gave the central bank a mandate, and central banks worked out a framework that to date has been effective in dealing with it. No one has a clear mandate at the moment to deal with the threat of major financial instability, but I cannot help but feel that the threat from that source is greater than the threat from inflation, deflation, the balance of payments and the other familiar economic variables we have confronted in the past.

Ian Macfarlane was the governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia from 1996 until his retirement in September.

http://tinyurl.com/yabfzd

 
Comment by Dr.Strangelove
2006-12-15 08:50:26

Off topic, but have to rant a little.

Has anyone else here seen the TV credit card ad where there is a store with a mega-long line of shoppers waiting to check out. all of them are dutifully swiping their credit cards like good retail robots, then this guy walks up with cash in hand, and everyone moans and groans like he’s some sort of idiot for using cash and “holding up the line.”

My girlfriend and I were appalled. We’ve got nothing against credit cards–if they’re used with common sense, but this kind of ad is very indicative of the mentality that drives this “got to have it now” credit bubble.

I try to use cash as much as possible, as I spend much less, save more and buy less impulsively. I’ve said this before–but Chompsky’s right on the money. The media and those who run it’s goal–is to keep churning-out mindless consuming robots. Better to keep their minds off of the real issues.

Rant off.

DOC

Comment by Hoz
2006-12-15 09:24:10

Just as disgusted as you by the cogs of a wheel commercial. good rant

 
Comment by chilidoggg
2006-12-15 09:43:50

I’ve seen that ad, too, and I hate it as well. Plus, its a “check card” not even credit. Oops, lost the card - Mr. Banker, please put that $2,000 back into my account, I’ve got to pay the rent today?

It’ called an ATM, people. They’re everywhere.

I remember as a little kid, bored out of my skull at the bank while my mom waited in line to make a withdrawal.

 
Comment by oc-ed
2006-12-15 11:08:04

DOC,

Yes! That ad drives me nuts too.

 
Comment by spike66
2006-12-15 12:24:45

i use cash myself. Bought a gift at Best Buy, you’d think the clerk had never seen cash before. Seriously, he looked confused, and had to count it twice. Using cash does cut down on spending, also, I am not happy to leave a trail for data banks.

Comment by Graspeer
2006-12-15 13:25:00

“Using cash does cut down on spending”

The same for me, its makes me think twice when I have to count the money out of my wallet, swiping a card is just to easy.

 
 
 
Comment by chilidoggg
2006-12-15 08:56:51

WTF!

Prime rib roasts are 25% higher than last year at SoCal grocery stores.

Stater Bros has them same as last year, $3.99/lb.

 
Comment by crispy&cole
2006-12-15 09:11:11

local prices continue to fall:

http://bakersfieldbubble.blogspot.com

 
Comment by Lander
2006-12-15 10:25:52

Placer & Yolo Down Double-Digits
Sacramento Down 8%

sacramentolanding.blogspot.com

 
Comment by bj
2006-12-15 10:47:06

Here in North Mpls (for those unfamiliar w/ the region–our ‘less gentrified’ part of town) we have a new urban blight. It seems the copper strippers made the abandoned house go boom. A new trend as the # of empty homes increases as foreclosures increase? The television news made it sound like this is not the first case of the year…
http://www.startribune.com/462/story/877064.html

 
Comment by kip
2006-12-15 11:53:15

local weatherman convicted of mortgage fraud

http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_98306.asp

Former Channel 9 weatherman Neal Pascal pleaded guilty in Federal Court Thursday morning to a mortgage fraud charge.

Pascal, 51, appeared before Judge Curtis Collier.

The bill of information says he “did knowingly make and use and cause to be made and used a false writing and document, knowing the same to contain a materially false statement and represent the sales price to be $129,000 on a HUD settlement statement form. . .” That was April 29, 2002.

The actual sales price was $110,000 on the house at 2416 Corral Trail in Chattanooga, officials said.

Prosecutors said Pascal purchased a large number of real estate properties in the Chattanooga and North Georgia areas.

The plea agreement says he typically identified properties that were for sale by owner. He would negotiate a sales price, then request that the owner “agree to an artificial and inflated sales price in order to enable him to borrow more money from the lender.”

The seller would agree to refund the difference to Pascal at closing, officials said.

The plea agreement says, “The difference usually represented the down payment and allowed the defendant to purchase the property without having to make a permanent down payment that required use of his own money.”
Executive Title Company prepared the false HUD form.

Officials said after the closing, the seller wrote a check to Pascal for $19,500, “representing the additional money received from the lender as a result of the fraud.”

The lender was ABN AMRO Mortgage Company of Michigan.

Comment by Graspeer
2006-12-15 13:31:14

“prepared the false HUD form.”

That was his mistake, the Feds like to make examples of those who cheat them and they have the power to do it. He should have just ripped off some sub-prime lender and have the whole thing get buried when the sub-prime lender sells off the bad loan to some faceless investors.

 
Comment by crispy&cole
2006-12-15 16:05:28

Good post - multiply this by ohhhhh 200,000 loans!!

 
 
Comment by AnonyRuss
2006-12-15 15:28:02

FHA BRINGS THE HOLIDAYS HOME WITH A SPECIAL HOMES SALES EVENT
“We want to make the homebuying process even more special this holiday season, by helping more families realize the American dream.”
During the “FHA Brings the Holidays Home” sales event, homebuyers who purchase a HUD-owned home and finance the purchase with an FHA-insured loan will be entitled to valuable sales incentives including:
$2,500 Holiday Home Improvement Allowance
$500 Selling Broker Bonus
Minimum Required Downpayment of Only $100

http://www.hud.gov/news/release.cfm?content=pr06-149.cfm

 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-12-15 15:54:21

THIS WEEK’S REAL ESTATE STORIES

News over the last couple of months that prices on resold homes had
fallen from their year-ago levels in many parts of the country has not
spooked many homeowners about the prospects for their own houses, a Pew
Research Center study shows. But that is not to say they haven’t
tempered their enthusiasm.

Nearly half of U.S. homeowners, 46%, say their home has increased in
value “a lot” over the last few years. But only about half of those
homeowners think they’ll get similar appreciation in the future. The
bulk of homeowners overall, 55%, believe the value of their homes will
go up “a little” in the future; 26% still think they’ll enjoy “a lot” of
appreciation. Just 10% of homeowners in the U.S. say they think the
value of their house will decline in the future.

It may be that homeowners are taking home prices in stride. Only
one-quarter in the Pew survey report that rising home prices have had
some or a great deal of effect on their personal finances.
Three-quarters say the value of their home has little or no influence
over their finances.

And the idea that Americans are using their homes as giant piggybanks
may be overblown as well. Only 20% of homeowners said they have a second mortgage or home-equity loan on their property, and of those nearly half, 45%, said they were using that money to pay for home improvements or repairs. Less than 3% of all homeowners were using a second mortgage to invest in real estate or buy a second home. About 2% were using home-equity money to pay credit cards or other debt and about the same percentage bought a car with their proceeds. Just over 1% were using the money to fund an education.

Despite several years of huge price gains, housing’s relative position
in homeowners’ net worth hasn’t changed since a similar survey Pew
conducted in 1992: About a third of homeowners say that their home
accounts for “all or most” of their personal financial worth, and
another third say it accounts for about half.

The figures come from a nationwide Pew Research Center telephone survey of a random sample of 2,000 adults, including 1,500 homeowners, taken from Oct. 18 through Nov. 9.

The survey was taken not long after the National Association of
Realtors reported in its monthly sales numbers that year-over-year
national average home prices had fallen. In October the trade group said
the median sales price of an existing home was $221,000, down a record
3.5% from October 2005. That data, released in November, marked the
third straight month in which home prices were reported to have fallen.
(The Realtors still expect that for the whole year home prices
nationally will rise just over 1%.)

But any downturn in prices comes after such a big run-up that it is
unlikely to shake homeowners, especially those with a long-term
perspective: Home prices have risen fourfold in the last 25 years, the
Office of Federal Enterprise Housing Oversight says. That makes it
easier not to get worried about a couple of percent here or a couple of
percent there.

Steve Kerch, assistant managing editor/personal finance

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post