March 6, 2006

Pending Home Sales Fall For ‘Fifth Straight Month’: NAR

Bloomberg has the NAR data. “Contracts to purchase previously owned U.S. homes fell for a fifth straight month as higher prices and mortgage rates discouraged buyers. The National Association of Realtors said today its index of pending home resales fell 1.1 percent to 116.3 in January. The index fell 2.6 percent to 117.6 in December. Pending sales were forecast to rise 0.3 percent.”

“‘Clearly, the market has slowed from the white-hot conditions that have existed over the prior years,’ Ara Hovnanian, chief executive officer of Hovnanian Enterprises Inc., said. Hovnanian, the ninth-biggest homebuilder by stock market value, is seeing some of its competitors using more incentives to sell homes they’ve already built. Order cancellations at the company rose ‘modestly’ in its fiscal first quarter, to 30 percent from 27 percent the same period a year earlier, Hovnanian said.”

From Inman News. “Robert P. Curran, an analyst for the Fitch Ratings agency, said builders’ net new orders for the latest quarter have generally been weaker than a year ago. ‘What they see or fear with sluggish-to-weak orders will translate to sluggish-to-weak revenues and some pressure in earnings,’ he said. Cancellations on new-home orders have spiked in some areas, he said, such as the Greater Washington, D.C., area. ‘What I see there is more a reflection on short-term investors who committed to buy a home (and then) bailing out and giving up the deposit.’”

“Phillip Neuhart, a Wachovia economic analyst, said analysts expected to see a stronger showing for January new-home sales. ‘I’d like to see the inventory numbers notch down a little bit,’ he said. The current level ‘is not comfortable for me,’ he said.”

“Existing-home sales have dropped each month from September 2005 through January 2006, according to NAR. ‘The question is now (whether) builders will adjust to the slower sales. My concern is that builders, just like retailers, should adjust their pipelines to what’s going on,’ Neuhart said. Hopefully, he added, builders will construct fewer homes for which they have not previously secured buyers.”

Reuters has this report on the mortgage market. “The expansion of new types of home loans in the United States means mortgage bond holders may be exposed to bigger than expected losses if the housing market cools, Bank of International Settlements staff research said.”

“An article published in the latest BIS quarterly review said the boom in private mortgage lending and the extension of loans to households with less than perfect credit histories had exposed investors to higher risks. ‘The significance of this additional risk has been disguised in recent years by housing price appreciation,’ researcher Allen Frankel said. But now there were signs of the market cooling.”

“‘To the extent that some investors may have failed to recognise the degree of sensitivity of their MBS investments to housing market developments, they may be exposed to losses in excess of what they had anticipated.’”

“Non-traditional mortgages helped extend a five-year rally in the U.S. housing market by reducing monthly payments and allowing homebuyers to afford ever-pricier houses. But some economists now worry that as interest rates rise, so will defaults as borrowers may find themselves unable to make payments, also pressuring the banks that offered the mortgages and the investors who hold much of the risk due to their purchases of mortgage-backed securities.”

“The BIS said while the U.S. mortgage market was still dominated by the government-sponsored Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, non-agency MBS issuance had almost doubled in recent years. At the same time, more than 75 percent of new loans issued by private lenders now went to borrowers who missed out on the top ‘prime’ credit rating and who often paid higher interest rates as a reflection of the added risk of default.”

“The BIS said the common practice of using average credit scores to price mortgage pools could lead to a systemic underprediction of default risks and leave investors exposed if housing prices turned down. Market pressure, driving down mortgage costs, also made it more difficult to assess the risk of borrowers refinancing and paying off loans ahead of time, depriving investors of a revenue stream, BIS said.”

And a Fed official had this, “While the housing sector may not contribute as much to growth this year and next as it has the past couple of years, Stern said concerns about the collapse of a housing bubble are overblown. ‘The probability of a large and widespread decline is not great,’ Gary Stern, president of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank said. ‘And if it occurred, I don’t think the impact would be that great’ on the economy.”




RSS feed | Trackback URI

40 Comments »

Comment by need 2 leave ca
2006-03-06 08:56:24

DUH, what did they expect when all that people used were toxic mortgages, at least in the bubbly coastal areas. The default rate in CA will be very large when the ARMs reset. I read enough mortgage to know that there are thousands and thousands of FBers, and some extreme FBers. McMansions for everyone, $1 a piece.

 
Comment by The Lingus
2006-03-06 09:05:58

“Phillip Neuhart, a Wachovia economic analyst, said analysts expected to see a stronger showing for January new-home sales. ‘I’d like to see the inventory numbers notch down a little bit,’ he said. The current level ‘is not comfortable for me,’ he said.”

Don’t let reality impinge on your comfort level you idiot.

Comment by bottomfisherman
2006-03-06 09:52:07

Time to get out of your comfort zone , RE industry morons. Hard times are in store.

 
Comment by Betamax
2006-03-06 10:01:21

LOL. Lingus, I thought the same thing.

Comment by The Lingus
2006-03-06 10:13:56

LOL. Lingus, I thought the same thing.

:) ….. Do these imbeciles have any idea how stupid they sound? It’s like everyone started speaking in a different language 5 years ago.

 
 
Comment by RentinginNJ
2006-03-06 11:05:49

Well, I would like to see prices notch down a little bit. The current level is not comfortable for me.

Comment by The Lingus
2006-03-06 11:13:03

Sure thing. I’m sure David Liareah has your discomfort on the top of his priority list. Should he fetch you a pillow and a drink too?

Comment by CharlesM
2006-03-06 13:16:56

“Liareah”

This made me laugh out loud. :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Bob the Banker
2006-03-06 09:08:19

The guy from the Fed seems to be whistling past the graveyard. In the article he says:

“The probability of a large and widespread decline is not great,” he said. “And if it occurred, I don’t think the impact would be that great” on the economy.

He also says that inflation is not a risk and that he’s “never been a fan” of the theory that tight labor markets would lead to upward pressure on wages.

I think they might want to dial down his prozac prescription.

Comment by The Lingus
2006-03-06 09:10:50

Comment by Bob the Banker
2006-03-06 09:08:19
The guy from the Fed seems to be whistling past the graveyard. In the article he says:

“The probability of a large and widespread decline is not great,’’ he said. “And if it occurred, I don’t think the impact would be that great’’ on the economy.

He also says that inflation is not a risk and that he’s “never been a fan” of the theory that tight labor markets would lead to upward pressure on wages.

I think they might want to dial down his prozac prescription.

Indeed a very interesting statement. Could that be interpereted as saying that wage pressure will go unabated? I hope so.

 
Comment by Pismobear
2006-03-06 13:10:21

What a bunch of idiots. I’ve tracked the recessions back to ‘69 and we’ve had 5 good ones every time the yield curve inverted. Did you catch the ten year today. Market hiccuped as well.

 
 
Comment by Northern VA
2006-03-06 09:12:24

Glad to see they mention the spike in cancellations in the DC Metro area. I don’t know if there is a place for stats to gauge new home inventory but anecdotally I go to NVhomes, Toll, or Khov and see they have more homes available for immediate delivery. The existing home inventory on the MLS is setting new multi-year records everyday in Northern VA. I have seen some new home incentives at 100k off list price, these are usually for the $1M homes so it isn’t huge but it is a start.

 
Comment by Catherine
2006-03-06 09:13:52

Is Leahry out of his office today? Pray tell, Leahry, mouthpiece of thy NAR entity…what does thou forecast in these dour days?

Comment by Penina
2006-03-06 10:04:36

In the Bloomberg article:

`This looks like we’re touching down for the soft landing we’ve been expecting,” David Lereah, chief economist at the National Association of Realtors, said in a statement today. “Home sales at this level are historically strong and provide a solid foundation for the overall economy.”

Comment by The Lingus
2006-03-06 11:07:43

`This looks like we’re touching down for the soft landing we’ve been expecting,’’ David Lereah, chief economist at the National Association of Realtors, said in a statement today. “Home sales at this level are historically strong and provide a solid foundation for the overall economy.’’

This guy Dave Liareah talks like he’s on the GOP/Whitehouse payroll.

Comment by KennyBabes
2006-03-06 11:36:14

Or is the GOP on his payroll.

It is so hard to tell who is buying whom these days.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by The Lingus
2006-03-06 11:40:39

Comment by KennyBabes
2006-03-06 11:36:14
Or is the GOP on his payroll.

It is so hard to tell who is buying whom these days.

Good point.

 
 
Comment by Pismobear
2006-03-06 13:14:11

Better get your loan now if you’re getting. Bill Thomas is retiring, and if the Dems take over the house your taxes are going up and Chas Rangle will be in charge of Ways and Means. Now I know we’re in for a recession.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by TheLingus
2006-03-06 13:49:19

Revenue has to be raised somehow to cover the out of control spending. Print money? Haven’t the republikkkans done enough of that? Taxes will be raised. Clearly, republikkkans are far too cowardly to do it.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by deb
2006-03-06 09:14:28

“…more than 75 percent of new loans issued by private lenders now went to borrowers who missed out on the top ‘prime’ credit rating…”

Yikes, that seems like an awful lot of “less than prime” borrowers.

Comment by GetStucco
2006-03-06 09:38:27

Seems like an awful lot of “broke-back” borrowers…

(Sorry — couldn’t resist this! No offense is intended — just trying to have some fun with words here.)

Comment by Anton
2006-03-06 10:49:50

I’m a unoffended fag. Loved the movie, by the way. Balled my eyes out (no pun intended).

Comment by Tom DC/VA
2006-03-06 12:52:47

It’s “bawled” I do believe. Unless you are a contortion artist.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Anton
2006-03-06 13:32:23

I know. It actually was SUPPOSED to be a pun, though I am flexible.

 
 
 
 
Comment by arizonadude
2006-03-06 09:42:17

“private lenders now went to borrowers who missed out on the top ‘prime’ credit rating and who often paid higher interest rates as a reflection of the added risk of default.”

Who are these private lenders? They have definitely lowered their standards for giving loans and fueled the fire.

 
 
Comment by fatsacca
2006-03-06 09:40:02

My guess is that existing home sales will continue to decline and HB’s will continue to build. HB’s don’t have the albatross of refi’d equity cash out to deal with in their prices, therefore they can always undercut existing homes. The average homeowner has priced himself out of the market through housing ATM withdrawals. It isn’t found money, it’s a loan that has to be repaid. Who is the biggest sucker? The fool who pays too much for a home or the idiot who essentially sells the house back to himself for twice the price with an equity cash out?

Comment by bottomfisherman
2006-03-06 09:49:38

They are both equally stupid. Let them rot.

 
Comment by scdave
2006-03-06 09:50:20

Correctohhh Sacto…..

To much spec., on the demise of the Big Builder…It will be the mid level and small builder that will be crushed along with anyone who happens to be in the Big Builders subdivision and needs to sell for what ever reason…

Watch for the builder incentives for Interest Rates…They will buy down the loan rates to make them terribly attractive to attempt to absorb what ever buyers remain…Just something a small builder (or home seller) cannot compete with…

 
Comment by AZ_BubblePopper
2006-03-06 10:01:58

Private builders will be fine. The publicly traded builders are in for a rough ride. They all loaded up on land, started projects and now they are stuck. They can’t allow Wall St to see sales fall off a cliff and shrink so they will keep building and try to cut margins to the bone - not good either.

Gonna get ugly once the ARM resets kick in. If rates keep running we may see 50% declines by next spring in some areas…

Comment by scdave
2006-03-06 10:15:28

Sorry AZ B-pop

Publicly traded builders have a 30% (Across the Board) advantage over mid level builders…Even a greater margins over small builders….

Comment by AZ_BubblePopper
2006-03-06 15:37:31

Those margins are only good at high sales rates - Laws of big numbers apply. Home building has boom-to-bust cycles and big companies have a tough time adjusting to much lower demand and smaller margins when they come off of a majorly geared up period. That and their stocks will get crushed driving borrowing costs up…

Not going to be pretty for big builders. You may see more consolidation?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Peter
2006-03-06 09:57:48

Is not Mr. Sterns an appointee of the Bushies and GOP? THat being so- I can take his wistful or should I say wishful thinking as politcal propaganda- which has about as much weight as a feather in the wind on a March day-

Mr. Sterns the word is INVENTORY!! You fricking idiot.

Comment by The Lingus
2006-03-06 10:04:29

Comment by Peter
2006-03-06 09:57:48
Is not Mr. Sterns an appointee of the Bushies and GOP? THat being so- I can take his wistful or should I say wishful thinking as politcal propaganda- which has about as much weight as a feather in the wind on a March day-

Mr. Sterns the word is INVENTORY!! You fricking idiot.

Hey…. It’s the new paradigm. Black is white and white black. Or make a complete fukk up and stand back and say “Hey, this is fukked up, somebody fix it.”

 
 
Comment by flat
2006-03-06 10:45:49

gee, who passed the community banking bill
F Raines an me

 
Comment by The Lingus
2006-03-06 10:55:54

Common sense would say a 60k/yr wage slave would have more to worry about that a banking bill. But then again, common sense is uncommon for altar dwellers.

 
Comment by need 2 leave CA
2006-03-06 15:07:38

The level of debt that I am comfortable with is - get ready - are you sitting down - will this surprise you? *********** ZERO ************** NADA ********* $0.00 *****DEBT FREE ******** ACTUALLY HAVING MONEY SAVED IN CASE NEEDED ****, too bad for all of the FBers that will find out the HELOCs that they used to buy all of their toys (or 5 more FLOPPER houses) will find out that the debt is REAL. Debt DOES NOT equal wealth. Debt = Debt. And one would be a slave to it when they can’t get out of it. The last few years, some people were lucky, because they found the greater fool. Those days appear to be over.

 
Comment by need 2 leave CA
2006-03-06 15:10:12

I was laughing so much on reading this blog. My stomach is hurting. Let’s have a TV show that will bail out one flopper a week, the one that has the saddest story. We’ll have 3 tell their stories on TV, and then the audience decide who the bigger FLOPPER is, and then the TV station will pay off the debt, so that they will no longer be a debt slave (but they don’t actually receive any money). Sounds like a great TV show idea. Hollywood, are you listening. I got patent rights on this show idea.

Comment by Anton
2006-03-06 15:58:45

Sounds like “Queen for a Day,” a television show in the ’50s, where women with sob stories competed for secret (and often horribly inappropriate) prizes.

 
 
Comment by need 2 leave ca
2006-03-06 23:16:14

shall we vote on who has 2 switch houses and debts with who?

 
Comment by need 2 leave ca
2006-03-06 23:22:52

NEW EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CONTESTANTS

housingbubblesobstory@yahoo.com

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post