March 19, 2007

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For March 19, 2007

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

244 Comments »

Comment by passthebubbly
2007-03-19 05:03:38

first…?

Comment by JP
2007-03-19 07:26:51

no no no. Please don’t let this turn into FC.com
I don’t think I could go thru that again…

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 07:45:05

Yes, please refrain.

 
Comment by passthebubbly
2007-03-19 10:21:19

Fair enough, and I apologize. I hated it on FC myself.

 
Comment by Greenlander
2007-03-19 13:24:08

Where is Joe Wang???

 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
Comment by winjr
2007-03-19 05:12:46

Man, everything except drinking beer in the morning and kicking the dog.

Comment by LARenter
2007-03-19 05:34:19

No, I saw a guy kicking the hell out of his dog the other night in back of my house. Nice, clean-cut finance-type looking guy. Poor dog just wouldn’t come to him. He turned around right in front of me and my husband and kicked the dog until it yelped!!! SICK B*stard!! Probably has some financial problems! We would have called the police had we known who he was!!

Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-03-19 07:25:45

The guy should be shot.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-19 07:37:02

You should have called them anyway. The dog needs to be taken away. If I saw someone hurt an animal, I would physically attack him (the human), then call the police myself.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by LArenter
2007-03-19 08:49:52

Crazy thing is that his wife just stood there are watched without saying a word!! He probably does it to her too! I told my husband they are probably in hot water financially due to some sort of real estate related mess and he told me that I would probably also start trying to tie Greenspan to the Kennedy shooting as well!! I still think I am onto something!!! People are SICK!!

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 08:54:56

Where was Mr. Greenspan, on the day of November 22, 1963?

A Very “faux” news way to slander somebody, without threat of lawsuit. Fox News (fair and balanced) does it all the time.

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-19 09:27:22

I disagree. Fox news is not nearly as bad at the three network biggies, CNBC, or CNN. Since you say Fox does it all the time, how about a list of incidents we can follow up on?

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 09:37:34

The list would use up entirely too much valuable broadband, sorry.

 
Comment by KirkH
2007-03-19 09:47:39

Here’s the list of Foxisms..
http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/03/fox_news_crazy_.html

Somewhat damning no?

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-19 09:49:46

That’s cheating. If you make an unverified or misleading accusation, the same thing you attriute to FOX, you are no different. Um, . . .Actually, you ARE different, since you accuse FOX of libel by innuendo, while you appear to actively engage in it. Either you have a list of real events, or you are just repeating what others say, also without evidence. How about THREE incidents; or TWO, or maybe ONE?

I don’t like Fox news myself, but I think you’re showing a political bias. I notice the blogs and web sites that blast Fox day and night are ALL extremely left-wing or extremely right-wing.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 10:02:09

I’m an inteligent man and can tell the difference between truth and lies. That’s all the proof I need.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 10:04:29

Even if sometimes I struggle to spell “intelligent”

ha

 
Comment by ahansen
2007-03-19 10:35:24

“you accuse FOX of libel by innuendo, while you appear to actively engage in it. Either you have a list of real events, or you are just repeating what others say, also without evidence. How about THREE incidents; or TWO, or maybe ONE?”

Assuming you’re not kidding, how about the recent straight-faced reportage that Barak Obama attended a madrassa when he was growing up in Indonesia?

And for the record? The madrassas were started and financed by the USSD in Afghanistan when “we” were trying to tweak the Soviets there back in the 80’s.

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-19 11:32:38

Thanks for giving examples. But, erroneous reports are not the same as libelous innuendos. And Cuvoto is not a reporter. Still, they are good examples. Now, how about doing the same with CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, and CNBC? There are several organizations that monitor all the news broadcasts and cablecasts, and I don’t know of a single “provider” has a high score for honesty or accuracy. CNBC and the other NBC cable company are notorious for their ignorance of the real estate bubble, as bloggers here know. I place all their news programs on the same level as CBN’s “Noah’s Ark Found Today” sort of hooey. They all have a political or “religious” axe to grind, and advertisers to keep happy, so what can you do?

As for being smart and knowing the difference between truth and fiction, how does this work? I’m smart, too, sometimes, and I think this claim is fictitious.

The point to my original letter, which I should have made, is that throwing in stuff about FOX has nothing to do with the subject at hand, and is just another pot shot. The subject at hand was animal abuse.

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-19 09:00:18

“Poor dog just wouldn’t come to him.”

I wonder why?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2007-03-19 09:04:19

Some people have no business owning dogs. And the current animal control system does nothing to screen them out. For details, see:

http://newanimalcontrol.org/screenfail.shtml

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tellall
2007-03-19 09:15:05

You haven’t seen anything yet. See this in Cincinnati from yesterday’s paper. Don’t read further if you are faint of heart.

Yuk!

Reward is offered in gruesome death of dog
By Denise Wilson
Hamilton JournalNews
In one of the most extreme animal cruelty cases ever seen in Butler County, a dog’s body was found Thursday boiled and skinned along Four Mile Creek Road in Butler County’s St. Clair Township.

The Animal Friends Humane Society in Trenton is offering a reward for information leading to the arrest or conviction of those responsible.

The body of the dog - which humane society officials believe was a 2-year-old, dark brown male chow/pit bull mix - was brought to the humane society by Butler County Animal Control about 1:30 p.m. Thursday. It had been skinned, except for its feet, said Leland Gordon, executive director of the humane society.

A humane society veterinarian who performed an autopsy on the animal Thursday said it revealed that the 35 to 40-pound dog was boiled alive in oil or water and then skinned, Gordon said.

The dog’s body also had cuts on its legs and around the neck, he said. Around one of the rear legs, officials found a wire that might have been used to string up the animal, he said.

Gordon said it one of the most extreme animal cruelty cases the society has ever seen. “If people don’t like animals, they need to stay away from them,” he said, “or, if they have a problem animal, they need to bring him to their local animal shelter.

“Don’t do stuff like this to them. This is wrong, and it’s disgusting.”

Gordon said a similar case of a dog’s being skinned was reported about eight months ago in Morgan Township. That case also remains unsolved, he said.

Anyone with information about the dog found Thursday should call the Animal Friends Humane Society at (513) 867-5727 or write it at 5225 Trenton Road, Trenton, Ohio, 45067

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-19 09:31:46

I believe such cruelty should be punishable by same. I cannot even fathom the evil involved in such crimes, and there was a time when I didn’t believe in evil: I just considered it the absence of good (the perpetrators were “unenlightened”). Now I believe it is a force unto itself (the perpetrators are evil sons-of-bitches). And I am not religious.

 
Comment by davidcee
2007-03-19 11:06:00

” I cannot even fathom the evil involved in such crimes,”
I guess 3200 dead Americans in Iraq and 600,000 Iraqi’s is OK with you. No evil there!

 
Comment by KIA
2007-03-19 11:18:59

It really is a question of perspective. I was in Arlington Cemetary this past weekend, visiting a friend who served in Vietnam. He was buried with his father who served in WWII. I found myself looking up the hill toward Lee’s mansion, at all of the rows of dead and wondering “Is that 3,000 dead? Do I see 3,000 headstones just here in this one portion of the cemetary? If I see 3,000 dead here, and this one man who we were here to visit had a dozen family members who were all hurt by his loss, how much loss, how much grief must those 3,000 friends, neighbors and families represent?”

I also looked around a little and noticed a half-dozen stones in the immediate area from D-Day, June 6, 1944. They died on the beaches at Normandy fighting to free France and throw off the yoke of Nazi oppressors who were really poised to try to take over the world.

Interestingly, using the new figures where the politicos only announce fatalities instead of casualties, storming the beaches of Normandy cost the Allies 2,500 dead.

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-19 11:40:40

2007-03-19 11:06:00
“‘I cannot even fathom the evil involved in such crimes,’
“I guess 3200 dead Americans in Iraq and 600,000 Iraqi’s is OK with you. No evil there!”

Excuse me, but what is the connection? Did I say the Iraq situation was good? Or that the deaths there are OK? You say “I guess . . . is OK with you?” Why would you guess something so incredibly stupid? Based on what? Did you have a paranormal feeling? Leaping to conclusions, especially such idiotic conclusions, is a sign of inductive, rather than inductive, thinking: the worst kind.

I opposed the war before it ever started, but the topic here was cruelty to animals, not war. Can one only oppose one bad thing at a time? If so, do you, therefore, think boiling dogs alive is not evil?

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-19 11:53:46

“inductive, rather than deductive” that should read.

 
Comment by talon
2007-03-19 11:59:51

“”I guess 3200 dead Americans in Iraq and 600,000 Iraqi’s is OK with you. No evil there! “”

Yes, what an incredibly asinine statement. As if it’s a zero-sum game. “I oppose cruelty to animals, therefore I don’t care about people.” Pathetic.

 
Comment by AKRon
2007-03-19 13:58:17

Important note, too… it is well-known that murderers, domestic violence perps and other violent people very commonly have a history of animal abuse, too. Call the cops on animal abusers and you might save some people…

 
Comment by Gadfly
2007-03-19 16:32:23

I smell a troll . . . .

 
 
Comment by talon
2007-03-19 11:55:44

ALWAYS call the cops when you see someone abusing an animal. At least you can give them a description, etc. Some tips on how to handle situations like that:

http://www.aspca.org/site/PageServer?pagename=cruelty_report

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-19 12:17:40

Thank Talon. Davidcee’s comment WAS stupid. I wonder if people bother reading the posts before firing off snide remarks.

Here is ghastly Florida, the welfare of animals doesn’t seem to mean much to our politicians, but I think the police are required to respond to animal abuse reports. Meantime, I hope they catch the bastard (s) who killed the dog as described in an above-post, and I hope the judge throws his, her, or their sorry ass (s) in jail for about a million years. Prosecutors should pile on the charges, and there should be no plea-bargaining. I tired of animals being treated as nothing more than property.

 
Comment by talon
2007-03-19 12:57:00

It’s changing, slowly. Animal cruelty, depending on the circumstances, is now a felony in many states.

 
Comment by Big V
2007-03-19 13:54:49

Talon:

Thanks for your link to the info on how to pursue animal cruelty cases.

I probably would have just jumped the guy and taken his dog, but then he probably would have just gone home and taken it out on his wife. Criminal prosecution really is best.

-Big V

 
 
 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-19 05:13:53

Forward that on to Senators Clinton and Dodd. I’m sure they would love to help this idiot out using “MY” money.

Even now he calls this woman “my dream”.

Comment by txchick57
2007-03-19 05:21:22

I know. As a woman, I find it incredible that men can be such suckers sometimes. They’ll shark some other guy to death in a business deal and then turn around and be a total patsy to some woman. Unbelieveable.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-19 05:30:46

You got that right, TX. And conversely how many women do you know that are confident and intelligent and then end up with some loser that beats them or bankrupts them? It’s amazing how stupid people can be.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2007-03-19 05:34:21

Right but when you’re a woman, if you’re “too smart” or make too much money, you cut out half of your potential market and the guys you’d be interested in go chasing the houskeepers or their secretary. See the movie “Spanglish” for example. It sucks either way.

 
Comment by Michael Fink
2007-03-19 05:44:40

Guys are totally insucure; that’s the only reason that makes any sense at all to me.

Why wouldn’t I want a smart women who brings in some good money? Are you really so insecure that the only way you measure yourself is by the size of your paycheck?

I made less money then my GF for awhile, and frankly, it bothered her more then me. She kept telling me how underpaid I was, but in a good natured way (not in the “go get a better job, deadbeat” way at all). I looked at the position as a great learning experience, and when I did change positions, increased my salary significantly (which is what I was working towards).

Anyway, I would never want a women to stay home and waste the day away. They don’t need to make more then me. But I have never met anyone that made “too much” money where I did not want to date them.

If you have confidence, the fact that the women across the table has a 6 figure income is attractive, not scary. I never want anyone to be dependent on my salary, or feel “kept” by what I can provide.

 
Comment by irvinesinglemom
2007-03-19 06:05:52

Right but when you’re a woman, if you’re “too smart” or make too much money, you cut out half of your potential market and the guys you’d be interested in go chasing the houskeepers or their secretary.

Right on, txchick. You’re singin’ my song!

 
Comment by eastcoaster
2007-03-19 06:27:33

Ditto here txchick.

 
Comment by Mike
2007-03-19 07:24:49

You’re just not meeting the right guys…

 
Comment by Darth Toll
2007-03-19 11:08:51

You guys are totally full of it. A woman that stays home taking care of the kids and the household is not wasting the day away. This is possibly the most important job anyone can do. IMHO, one of the main reasons this society is in decay is “women’s lib” and how the communists have sold women the bill of goods that it is somehow better to be out in the work force as opposed to taking care of the children. The commies completed the propaganda by painting stay-at-home moms as uneducated barefoot idiots with no life. This was done purposely (along with a multitude of other programs like planned parenthood, affirmative action, ACLU, etc.) to destroy the US from the inside with a huge dose of moral and societal decay. Of course, the Fed didn’t help with 80 years of constant inflation. It used to take one wage earner with a high school education to be able to afford a house, two cars, and 4-5 kids along with college for the kids. Now it takes two college-educated wage earners to be able to afford 1-2 kids and only a mountain of debt for the college education and the house - which will never be paid off.

But women and society are so much better off now, huh? Not! And don’t accuse me of being a Bush-bot as I can’t stand the guy. Bush isn’t a conservative anyway. BTW: I’m married to an intelligent and educated woman who stays home (her choice) to take care of the kids. For a few more years anyway!

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-03-19 11:35:40

In the last 50 years women have become a large part of the work force, the problem is that GDP has not increased to the extent that work participation has increased. e.g. In 1955 the husband worked the wife stayed home and raised the kids. Now Both work by necessity and a day care raises the children. The “new GDP” has doubled, new industries that were previously not needed - day care facility - becomes big business. This is BS GDP and when we take out the BS GDP numbers we are worse off than in the 1950s.

 
Comment by CA renter
2007-03-19 23:51:44

Agree with Hoz & Darth Toll.

Thank you for recognizing the important work stay-at-home parents do.

You really don’t know how much work it entails until you’ve done it yourself. I’ve had jobs outside of the house & inside. I can guarantee 100% that most SAHPs work much harder than their “workforce” counterparts.

Just MHO. :)

 
 
Comment by combotechie
2007-03-19 05:35:22

Thus the adage:

The game men play is money; The game women play is men.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by droog
2007-03-19 05:50:29

I’ve always liked the adage, “A man aims for the best looking woman he can afford; a woman aims for the wealthiest man her looks will attract.”

Sounds like a match made in heaven!

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-03-19 06:36:02

The wealthiest man (Marblehead old money, looked like Dennis Connor) I ever attracted basically spent our one date laying out for me how he could make me his Eliza Doolittle…when he asked for a 2nd date, and it was more than once, I couldn’t say no fast enough.

Who wants to be somebody’s breakable little trophy kept hidden away in the big house?….or run in circles where you’re always known as the former peasant girl….yeah, set me up for that life…..(not)

Anybody with a spark for life and any level of intelligence wants to live life on their own terms and experience respect for who and what they are.

 
Comment by txchick57
2007-03-19 07:27:02

Pathetic, isn’t, that these guys think this is the crap women want to hear? Maybe it is and I’m just out of it.

 
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2007-03-19 09:41:15

I suggest perhaps looking more at scientists and engineers. Smart people with (more often than not) open minds. Hidden gems, especially the ones that seem to have close to zero social skills. Give them some time and attention, they get some confidence built up, and usually a likable personality develops.

The average doctor wants to marry a school teacher. The average investment banker wants a stay-at-home mother. The average lawyer wants an airhead with large breasts. Frankly, scientists and engineers are probably, per capita, the best-educated members of society that have no gender biases in the workplace.

 
Comment by txchick57
2007-03-19 09:53:55

My husband has an engineering undergrad.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-03-19 10:55:33

That’s interesting….so does mine.

I think you’re onto something there Brian.

 
Comment by glorgau
2007-03-19 12:21:15

> The game men play is money; The game women play is men.

Hence Anna Nicole ;-)

 
Comment by mrquoi
2007-03-19 12:51:42

Having spent a lot of time in the company of science and engineering grad students and postdocs, I am 100% certain that they are also attracted to large breasts. Actually, small ones, too. No, actually, anything with breasts.

 
Comment by rms
2007-03-19 13:43:29

“Frankly, scientists and engineers are probably, per capita, the best-educated members of society that have no gender biases in the workplace.”

I have an engineer friend in San Jose, CA., and his other half left him a couple of years ago because he wouldn’t buy a house there. The courts said, good enough; she got the assets and he got the liabilities.

 
 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2007-03-19 05:37:04

hope the first gop member to offer bail is beaten bloody by actual conservatives (are there any ?)
it’s all a gag like SS fund
in 03 they showed W the doomsday book and w greenspin’s urging the US took out and arm loan

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 11:49:15

I’m supposed to start getting $1262.00 a month, in the year 2025, from the moolah I was forced to put into social security…

Good thing I made other plans~

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 12:15:02

In the year 2025

If the economy is still alive

Man just might thrive

and i’ll get my $1262.00

Maybe you will, too?

 
 
Comment by AKRon
2007-03-19 14:09:11

Dennis Hastert doesn’t need to. He sold his land for a huge profit. What a coincidence that he pushed for a highway that gave access to the land…

http://www.abcnews.go.com/images/WNT/Hastert_Disclosure.pdf

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 14:11:08

Oh good, he can buy more food.

 
 
 
 
Comment by bendtreehugger
2007-03-19 05:26:54

Is Diana the name of his boat?

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-19 05:31:36

I think he named his wang. And he sure misses it.

Comment by WAman
2007-03-19 05:51:20

LFAO

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Lou Minatti
2007-03-19 05:31:21

Another one:

http://louminatti.blogspot.com/2007/03/reality-bites.html

Craig’s List has been a treasure trove lately. But no worries, they’ll get bailed out soon enough. See, in America it just doesn’t pay to be careful with your budget and save money.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-03-19 05:47:08

Sounds like there is going to be a nervous breakdown or some sort of inward or outward violence in this man’s future. That post made me shudder.

Soon people facing this level of stress will form influencial numbers. Interesting times ahead.

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-19 05:55:26

Hi, CarrieAnn, I’ve been looking for you to answer your question from another thread about the money for WWII. As Bill in Carolina said, it came from “deficit spending” (essentially borrowing), same as the money for the current military action in the Middle East.

Interesting that there was all kinds of money around for a war, but none to lift the Depression. We are seeing much the same thing now, all sorts of money for the military/industrial complex, but none for secure borders, health care, infrastructure, stimulation of our own production, etc. Just a lot of funny money for housing speculation, which is now going into the crapper.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-03-19 10:46:39

Hi Palmetto,

Funny, I was thinking about how I asked that question last night and forgot to see if anyone answered. Thanks for finding me.

I knew in WWII we went into deficit spending…borrowing.

But I guess what I was asking was who lent to such a broke country? I spend a lot of time pondering when the Asian countries and are going to pull the plug on us. Maybe we won’t be as alone as feared.

My husband made the comment last night about WWII getting us out of the Depression and I added that that only worked because the other countries (and their economies) came out of the war in shambles while we remained intact (and so had 70% of the world’s wealth).
Would our leaders attempt a repeat performance?

Except those nasty missiles can reach our shores this time….ooops.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by oc-ed
2007-03-19 06:28:38

You may be right CarrieAnn. As I understand it the only way she could have prevailed on her domestic abuse charge was if there was a police report documenting early abuse. Either Todd has a less than pristine record in this area or he had one lousy attorney. There’s no doubt in my mind that our Family court system is flawed and this FB is on the road to a place where you take vacations in Hell from. Prime candidate for a meltdown. Probably has maxed out his credit cards too cause they’ll loan even a kid with no income 21k. I wonder how many toys he is trying to keep? He should be liquidating things on craigslist rather than crying for a bailout.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 06:36:58

Get out of our big cities, while there is still time.

Comment by Jasper
2007-03-19 07:12:29

TxChick,

Your posts are always very well written and insightful. I dont write much, but i do read often :) A an ametuer movie buff, and as much of an antropoligist as all of us here relating to human decision making. This is just a different take on Spanglish…..which by the way, two tumbs up. Speaking as an American Male:

Not that there is much room to disagree with men chasing the ego-boosting, i-need-a-hero, combination-hair-toss-and-giggle drug company presenter pretty girl husband stealing Evanna Trump wanna be, however, there is an alternate viewpoint to Spanglish as well.

The movie, for me, hit home why American men can be attracted to foreign women who can still be tough, full of principles, character, cherished, and still feminine enough to enjoy being swept off her feet and carried accross the threshold. Unlike his wife who desprately wanted to compete with a man, as a man, and be a man while still having her kids lover her as a friend AND a mom which is a hopless treadmill of discontent and set up for failure from the off. To me it is also a commentary on how difficult and impossible are the expectations Americana place on females which simply arent there in other coutries. (And yes ive lived overseas for many years)

Different point of view. I never did notice the movie as the husband running off with the maid. I saw it more as a heterosexual man retaliating against his butch wife who forgot how to, or simply no longer wanted to be, femine. And i dont attribute that to her being abnormal, more of her peer group constantly pushing her for more. It is a recipie for disaster, which, funny enough, isnt so different from how the whole housing bubble came to be……..

J

p.s. did you like that segway at the end, how i cleverly steered it back to the blog :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2007-03-19 07:31:05

Well they always have to draw these characters broadly, almost as a caricature, in order to cause different members of the audience to “identify” and have an emotional stake in the outcome. That’s why I find so many of those movies just insulting because as we all know, in real life there are very few absolutes, people are complex and you can’t wrap up most situations in an hour.

Maureen Dowd has written some good stuff about this guy with the secretary stuff. I’ve observed it myself over the years. I don’t know what the answer is and I’m glad I don’t have to figure it out.

 
Comment by Jasper
2007-03-19 07:36:18

:) fair enough.

Personally, id have to agree with you. Im not a big defender of men, and im damn glad i dont have to date them or find one. As a man, it does become a bit old to feel continually slated as the bad guy. Ah well, we all have our crosses to bear.

Movie simplicty. Agreed. Insulting yes. In a perverted way. I find it entertaining and charming.

J

 
Comment by combotechie
2007-03-19 09:17:20

Someone described being “in love” as being “in imagination”. Infatuation produces a hormone high, similar to an amphetamine high, which makes everything in the world to suddenly seem wonderful.
The secretary is the newest, freshest, sweet-young-thing in the guy’s life and thus his imagination runs wild; The wife at home represents yesterday’s long-ago-spent infatuation, where love’s imagination has waned.

 
Comment by Lionel
2007-03-19 11:10:47

As a little background on Spanglish, as I understand it, James Brooks, a normally reliable writer (see Broadcast News if you don’t believe me), had a horrible, protracted divorce with his wife about the time he wrote this. This was clearly reflected in Tia Leoni’s character.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2007-03-19 05:11:10

In today’s WSJ, Paul Kasereil or Northern Trust mentions that he consults the compilation of articles in housing bubble blogs for the direction of the market. Even though the compilations are slanted one way, the sheer volume of the articles leads him to believe there are still problems, it said.

Comment by passthebubbly
2007-03-19 05:24:06

STILL problems? You ain’t seen nothin’ yet!

 
Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2007-03-19 05:25:27

link please…

Comment by WT Economist
2007-03-19 05:29:11

We get it at home. It’s subscribers only. And since my wife has it now, I can’t type in an except.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 05:46:39

Why shouldn’t we have valuable insight?

We are all individuals, not korporate lackey reporters that are either in deep denial, because it effects their job, or they simply cannot tell the truth, because the powers that be, will not let it shine on the rather large urine stain, that currently covers much of the country.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by WestSideGeorge
2007-03-19 06:08:03

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.” - Upton Sinclair

 
Comment by bluto
2007-03-19 06:28:54

The WSJ isn’t a paper that converted to a pay for online access model, they offer better news (or really more specialized news) for a premium price. Your individual can march down to the library and read it for free (ymmv on the urine stains there) or pony up a few bucks a month and read it at home.
Besides the value of the insight is directly proportional to the number of people who don’t have it.

 
Comment by passthebubbly
2007-03-19 10:29:12

We’re not separated from reality via layers of editors, corporate/journalistic cultures, the need to appear balanced and to cover one’s ass, industry “experts”and “analysts” who have no idea what’s really going on at the ground level, the formality of the journalistic process, time delay and so on. We call BS on some dude on CNBC without having to worry about Maria Bartiromo being on our payroll too, stuff like that. We have no career here to lose, but plenty of others to call our bluff when we lie.

Yay, blogosphere.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 10:39:07

A good example of reporting would be the el lay times…

A week ago, they pronounced that the Sierra Snowpack was adequate. If you didn’t know better, you’d believe them, who would ever lie about something as important as a source of fresh water?

The reality is that the snowpack is about 40 percent of normal, for both the Feather River system and the Eastern Sierra watersheds. And it has been melting furiously the past few weeks and over the next few weeks.

http://cdec.water.ca.gov/cgi-progs/current/PLOT_SWC

Why couldn’t the el lay times reporter look at the same data, easily available, for all to see?

 
Comment by passthebubbly
2007-03-19 10:44:09

Who needs data? I was in Tahoe over the Super Bowl and could see the lack of snow with my own eyes.

 
Comment by patient renter
2007-03-19 11:43:09

passthebubbly: agreed. The ski season was a total wash. It may be a dry summer.

 
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2007-03-19 11:45:45

“You don’t need a weatherman to tell you which way the wind is blowing”…Bob Dylan

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 11:56:32

Sometimes i’ll think of forbiddden food combos, food that tastes good by itself, but if you mix it with something else, it’s downright horrible. An example would be oysters and peanut butter. So very wrong.

We are headed for a forbidden food combo of an downward accelerating real estate market in el lay, combined with a severe water shortage…

 
 
Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2007-03-19 06:05:03

Thanks for the response, I tried for a search and couldn’t find a free link.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by PDXrenter
2007-03-19 06:54:34

AHEAD OF THE TAPE
By JUSTIN LAHART
Believing In House of Cards Haunts Investors
March 19, 2007; Page C1

Investors who trusted in the magical powers of the stock market to forecast a recovery in housing have been finding out what can come of trusting in fairy tales.

Less than two months ago, the idea that the housing market was at a turning point, and that shares of home builders were a screaming buy, was firmly established. In early February, the Dow Jones Wilshire U.S. Home Construction Index of home-builder stocks was 39% above its July 2006 low point. Since then, it has tumbled 21%.
…..
But not everyone got caught up in the idea that housing was on the road to Wellville. Ivy Zelman, a Credit Suisse analyst who became bearish on home-building stocks as they approached their top in July 2005, has continued to document how far-reaching the sector’s woes extend. Her latest report, published last week, details how the mortgage mess could affect the builders. She estimates that 20% fewer new homes will be sold in 2007 than last year.

Northern Trust economist Paul Kasriel says he saw no reason to revise his negative view on housing this fall. He thought the speculation on the way up had led to a glut of homes on the market that couldn’t be easily worked through, and he suspected there were lurking problems in the lax lending standards that helped to fuel the latter stages of the boom.

Finally, with the help of bearish housing blogs like Calculated Risk, Mr. Kasriel kept tabs on a lot of the local news stories on housing. Even allowing for the fact that there was a negative slant to which items were selected, he says, “there were so many bad stories out there that it suggested further problems.”

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-03-19 11:48:42

I listened to Paul Kasriel on a business news broadcast at lunch today. The one new thing that he said was “Perhaps, the Fed wishes to cause a recession in order to get the excess out of the economy.” This may have some validity since the first duty of a federal reserve member is to lie. Contrary to popular belief, The fed is not stupid - it just acts that way. Personally I think of the fed as crooks.

 
 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-19 05:38:23

“consults the compilation of articles in housing bubble blogs”

Yep, I commented yesterday on one economist from the American Enterprise Institute who had submitted an “essay” to a website that I frequent and the essay was mostly composed of Ben’s compilations. In another essay, he mentioned punishing the innocent along with the guilty, something we have all speculated on in this blog.

While it is good to see the message getting out, Ben and other bloggers work hard to put these compilations together and meanwhile are supported by donations and meager internet advertising revenues. I’m not sure about this particular economist, but most are well paid by the think tanks. I can only hope he approached Ben before using the compilations and offered a donation, otherwise Ben did his work for him and that is not OK.

Comment by albrt
2007-03-19 09:11:01

I have seen about a dozen articles and blogs mentioning “29 lenders have imploded” or “36 lenders have imploded” or whatever the previous day’s total was on the implode-o-meter. They rarely give Aaron credit, although it’s pretty obvious where they got the information.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 09:20:27

I’ve seen my quotes lifted, many times.

It’s no biggie. It’s akin to photography, then vs now.

If you were Robert Capa and had complete control over the film you took photos of, one could be paid handsomely, for your efforts. Nowadays, if you like a photo on the internet, just right click and save it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by passthebubbly
2007-03-19 10:39:24

Photographers have no secrets. I can go to Yosemite with a camera too, but that doesn’t make me Ansel Adams. The difference is in things like passion and execution.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 11:20:06

I was talking more about the finished product, than the ability factor…

 
 
 
 
Comment by homoaner
2007-03-19 11:45:45

Here’s excerpts from the WSJ article that WT Economist mentioned:

Investors who trusted in the magical powers of the stock market to forecast a recovery in housing have been finding out what can come of trusting in fairy tales.

Less than two months ago, the idea that the housing market was at a turning point, and that shares of home builders were a screaming buy, was firmly established. In early February, the Dow Jones Wilshire U.S. Home Construction Index of home-builder stocks was 39% above its July 2006 low point. Since then, it has tumbled 21%.

But not everyone got caught up in the idea that housing was on the road to Wellville. Ivy Zelman, a Credit Suisse analyst who became bearish on home-building stocks as they approached their top in July 2005, has continued to document how far-reaching the sector’s woes extend. Her latest report, published last week, details how the mortgage mess could affect the builders. She estimates that 20% fewer new homes will be sold in 2007 than last year.

Northern Trust economist Paul Kasriel says he saw no reason to revise his negative view on housing this fall. He thought the speculation on the way up had led to a glut of homes on the market that couldn’t be easily worked through, and he suspected there were lurking problems in the lax lending standards that helped to fuel the latter stages of the boom.

Finally, with the help of bearish housing blogs like Calculated Risk, Mr. Kasriel kept tabs on a lot of the local news stories on housing. Even allowing for the fact that there was a negative slant to which items were selected, he says, “there were so many bad stories out there that it suggested further problems.”
– “Believing in House of Cards Haunts Investors”, by Justin Lahart (Wall Street Journal, March 19, 2007)

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-03-19 05:13:45

What mess! From the Washington Post:

By David S. Hilzenrath
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, March 16, 2007; Page D01

Executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac invoked the upheaval in the mortgage market yesterday as a reason for lawmakers to be cautious about subjecting them to stricter regulation.

The recent meltdown in unconventional home loans provided political ammunition for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac just as House members are poised to move ahead on long-delayed legislation aimed at tightening controls on the federally chartered mortgage-funding companies.

Freddie Mac chief executive Richard F. Syron testified yesterday that the legislation could not only hurt the two companies but also damage the already weakened housing market.

“We support strengthening [government] oversight, but not at the cost of crippling our ability to compete in the marketplace,” Syron said in the longer, written version of testimony delivered to the House Financial Services Committee.

Fannie Mae chief executive Daniel H. Mudd’s criticisms of the bill were milder. After testifying, he called the bill “a positive step forward” compared with earlier proposals. But at a time when regulators, rivals and other critics question how much the public benefits from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Mudd said the companies can cushion shocks such as the trouble in the subprime mortgage market.

He said Fannie Mae is developing loans to rescue borrowers trapped in mortgages with sharply rising interest rates. Syron said Freddie Mac is developing safer alternatives to existing subprime loans.

But Judith A. Kennedy, president of the National Association of Affordable Housing Lenders, testified that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have helped fuel the increase in subprime mortgages by purchasing securities backed by such loans and not doing enough to offer alternatives in the past.

URL: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/15/AR2007031502138.html

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-19 05:17:28

And Dodd wants to use these institutional abortions to help the FBs. Good luck.

Unintended consequence #1 of the bailout: Mortgage loans will be nearly impossible to get. Who would want to loan out money to anybody with the slightest chance of defaulting if they know the government will step in and let the victim, I mean borrower, stop making payments for a while?

Maybe Joe Momma can tell us about Hillary’s great plan for the FBs like that great healthcare plan he is so fond of.

Bail out the FBs and the housing market dies. Don’t bail out the FBs and the housing market dies. It might be cold in NYC today but the sun sure is shining.

Comment by davidcee
2007-03-19 11:16:16

Hey, NYCityBoy! Sounds like a women with brains threatens you. I know for a fact Hillrry read a book once, and this puts her one up on the Moron in Chief now in charge of this mess.
I’ll trust her do due something, anything, to unwind the worst president in the US history

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-19 11:27:05

I have yet to meet somebody whose intelligence threatens me.

All Bush bashers, please answer this. How does George Bush being dumb make other people, like Hillary Clinton, smart? They are all dumb in my book. I define “dumb” as the ability to take in all the facts and draw the worst possible conclusion from those facts. Therefore, all politicians are pretty damn dumb in my book.

By the way misspelling “woman” didn’t do a lot to help your credibility.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2007-03-19 11:52:08

“the ability to take in all the facts and draw the worst possible conclusion from those facts”

What do call those that manipulate all the facts and then create the worst possible conclusion from those facts?

 
Comment by KIA
2007-03-19 13:37:31

Politicians?

Loan Brokers?

Realtwhores?

 
 
 
 
Comment by Quirk
2007-03-19 05:19:42

Fannie and Freddie are basically broke. How can anyone offer a bailout? There’s no way taxes can be raised any higher to compensate for the excesses. A deep recession is baked in the cake.

Comment by Fairfax_VA_Renter
2007-03-19 05:40:05

Wrong. Fannie and Freddie have tons of money (and a printing press in the basement).

Comment by John M
2007-03-19 06:04:17

Careful … Bob Blakely is hell-bent on Fannie financials by end of ‘07. The fog will lift in just nine months.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-19 09:07:41

“Fannie and Freddie are basically broke.”

Maybe that doesn’t matter, so long as Fannie is allowed to keep its balance sheet in black hole status. As I recall, Enron’s balance sheet problems did not fully come to light until the company collapsed.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2007-03-19 05:40:23

Syron said Freddie Mac is developing safer alternatives to existing subprime loans.

“Developing?” We already HAVE safer alternatives. It’s called 30-year fixed with 20% down and a 720 FICO. Of course, as that one analyst (who?) said, a return to traditional lending practices will return to traditional pricing. Can’t be having that, can we.

I don’t see what they can come up with that will keep people in their houses while not pissing off the responsible taxpayers (us.) Even a 50-year mortgage won’t work because there’s a cross point where the original teaser payment won’t cover interest.

The only viable “alternative” bailout I would agree to would be some kind of deal to where all mortgages (including the damn HELOC toys) become non-recourse Chapter 7 and folk jingle mail and rent. They should have been renting anyway.

Comment by arlingtonva
2007-03-19 06:12:33

Syron said Freddie Mac is developing safer alternatives to existing subprime loans

Renting?

Comment by arlingtonva
2007-03-19 06:13:07

italics off

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by zeropointzero
2007-03-19 10:03:45

Speaking of the washington post - there’s a follow-up today on the editorial page:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/18/AR2007031801054.html

The Pros, Getting Conned
A Financial Meltdown, Courtesy of the Big Boys

By Sebastian Mallaby
Monday, March 19, 2007; Page A15

The Great Mortgage Meltdown of 2007 recalls the beginning of the dot-com implosion in 2000. Once again, paper wealth is going up in smoke; once again, Wall Street banks that created the dud securities turn out to have been imperfect guides as to their value. But the current financial meltdown also differs importantly from the tech bust.

The danger is that Congress will see only part of this distinction.

 
 
Comment by droog
2007-03-19 05:14:15

How long do you think it will be before we see deterioration in Alt-A lenders? Which lender with an Alt-A portfolio will be the first to go belly-up?

Comment by passthebubbly
2007-03-19 05:26:39

Wachovia, having just bought world savings. None of the big banks are gonna go belly up, I don’t think, but there will be some hurting in a couple months.

Hope you sold all your bank stocks!

Comment by flatffplan
2007-03-19 05:39:35

even bob doll of blackrock said financials may sck
=wow that’s a big chunk

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-03-19 06:11:32

“None of the big banks are gonna go belly up, I don’t think, but there will be some hurting in a couple months.”

Pastthebubbly,
I was just finishing that book on Boldt Castle yesterday. In it, the author and one of his collaborators were discussing the “Rich Man’s Panic” that began in the summer of 1903.

“U.S. Steel plunged from $58 to $8 share, taking most of the market down with it….he was heavily interested in the Trust Company of the Republic, which was about to fail during that year, when (George) Boldt, a member of the Executive Committee of its Board, stepped in to run the bank.”

and

“The Great Bull Market was over, and financial panic hit in 1907. Boldt encountered one of the greatest crises of his life. A probably run on his bank threatened disaster. Boldt was one of those summoned by J.P. Morgan to the famous all-night session in his library, and the financier ordered Boldt to keep his doors open and to contribute to a fund to assist other threatened institutions. Boldt’s bank went into bankruptcy, but he earned Morgan’s enduring respect. Boldt evidenced his sense of honor and his responsible diligence in salvaging assets of the failed financial institutions for depositors, stockholders and creditors.”

from Boldt Castle, In Search of the Lost Story
by Paul Malo, Laurentian Press

Comment by 45north
2007-03-19 11:10:36

In August 2001, my wife and I visited Boldt Castle. Nice time.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2007-03-19 05:32:34

Impac seems to be the next candidate. The CEO was in the OC Register protesting much too loudly that they are not sub-prime.

Comment by passthebubbly
2007-03-19 05:33:50

they’re gonna feel the Impac of going into a brick wall at 100mph

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 06:13:19

The vision i’m seeing is not unlike the gory drivers training videos, I endured in high school.

Imagine these bankers are in a ginormous SUV, they’ve been driving way too fast and they think they are safe, because they are surrounded by so much steel, but nobody told them, that like the rest of our country, the reason SUV’s were peddled so hard, is that they are unsafe cars, (bolt-on chasis, vs much safer unibody construction, standard on regular passenger cars) and were highly profitable, because of lax safety standards…

They’ll all soon be Crash Test Dummies~

Oh yeah, the analogy:

The bankers are in their SUV and

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by dba
2007-03-19 06:09:09

later this year since a lot of the resets will start in 2q or 3q. 1q or early 2q is when everyone looks for homes or signs a contract. 2q and 3q is closing and starting to pay the mortgage

Comment by passthebubbly
2007-03-19 10:33:38

We like to use baseball-game inning metaphors here… I believe mid-late summer will be the inning when the other team bats around twice, scores 15 runs and you’re bringing your right fielder in to pitch.

 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2007-03-19 05:17:15

Last night, NBC nightly national news did a quickie report on the housing market. They started with a the usual sob story of family in California, then proceeded to decribe an A.R.M. (actually, it was an Option Arm Neg-Am, but really, do you expect NBC news to say that? Of course not.) The NBC website has the video up: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032619/

By the way, the sob family had excellent credit. As in, not subprime. Stick a fork in Alt-A.

Comment by txchick57
2007-03-19 05:24:04

Yeah well “excellent credit” usually means they’re in debt up to their asses, using cash advances from one credit card to pay the others, but by god, they make those minimum payments on time! OTOH, my husband’s credit report consists of two tradelines, a 20 year old student loan that was paid off, and now one crappy little credit card from his credit union. Yet he would be considered less desirable as a credit risk than the ones in debt up to their asses.

Comment by passthebubbly
2007-03-19 05:32:41

That’s because he doesn’t NEED credit!

 
Comment by WAman
2007-03-19 05:39:39

However you cannot have excellent credit if you owe too much. If these folks are in debt up to their eyeballs as one add states, their credit rating will probably be less than 700. I know that used to be me. Never late in over 27 years of credit, but in 2002 after finally losing everything in the stock market and no real job (I was a struggling real estate agent) I had to use CC’s to eat for 1 or 2 months. But no sob story here changed behavior and now very little debt and fico over 740.

 
 
Comment by dba
2007-03-19 06:07:14

i guess reading through a stack of papers written at jr high school reading level is beyond them

i remember on the ebay boards there used to be some fool who prided herself in not knowing anything and going to a so called expert for every little thing in life.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-19 05:23:32

An article begging the Federal government not to intervene and let nature take its course with respect to housing.

http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/opinion/homepage/article_1622045.php

Comment by Hoz
2007-03-19 07:16:40

“…government always makes matters worse by imposing regulations that almost always have unforeseen consequences….”

I love general statements!! LOL

 
 
Comment by GotRocks
2007-03-19 05:27:21

How about this, as the 4 phases of the meltdown?

Phase 1: ‘Investors’ leave the market
Phase 2: Subprime loans become unavailable
Phase 3: ARM Resets kick in big-time
Phase 4: Recession

Based on the above, Phase 1 is over - and half of the ‘buyers’ have simply vanished.

At this point, we’re still entering Phase 2 (Subprime meltdown). We need a couple more Subprime meltdowns to be fully in Phase 2 (i.e., there is still lots of easy money out there right now, but it takes more looking to find it). Once Phase 2 is complete, there will simply be zero first-time buyers in many, if not most markets.

Phase 3 (ARM resets) is set to really kick-in at the end of the year, and keep pounding for about the next 2 or 3 years, as the ARMs finally reach their full resets. This will kick out many, if not most, of the people that actually did intend on making their payments.

Phase 4 (recession) obviously may not happen, but if it does, look for even lots more foreclosures.

Given the above (with Phases 1, 2, and 3 assured, and Phase 4 likely), anyone who thinks that we’ve “hit bottom”, or this will be a “soft landing” is either nuts or simply lying through their teeth.

Of course if government gets involved, than who knows what will happen.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 05:50:43

So,

One might say that the low end home buyers got financially raptured?

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-03-19 07:29:41

GS, you forgot the ‘carry trade’ collapse (more likely now that China raised rates - allows Japan to raise rates) and the subsequent liquidity collapse that takes the air out of the world markets. “Asset-dependent economies go to excess because they generate a burst of domestic demand that outstrips the underlying support of income generation.” (Stephen Roach - Morgan Stanley) and From PIMCO “It is likely that the poor performance we have seen in subprime loans will carry over to some degree into the most aggressively underwritten loans in the Alt-A and possibly Jumbo prime markets…. We believe that we are in the middle of a downturn, not at the end, and that the problems created by expensive housing, overstretched consumer finance and years of Fed tightening have yet to take their full toll on the US housing market.”

Now Bill Gross and Stephen Roach and (as mentioned above) Paul Kasriel seem to be on the same page. My only compaint with Roach is the same crap in calling this an “asset dependent economy” , IMHO it is a liability dependent economy.

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
Comment by MGNYC
2007-03-19 06:11:52

wt
those curbed cheerleaders are funny. wall street will save the day and every transplant coming to brooklyn is a trust fund baby

 
 
Comment by jmf
2007-03-19 05:32:49

China announces 0.27 pct. rate hike / stocks almost up 3%!
wasn´t there a crash a few weeks ago… just afew points shy of a new ath!

ubs backing out of “lbo madness”

plus some great stuff from hussman!

http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/

Comment by flatffplan
2007-03-19 05:44:47

I thought China was smart to raise reserve /deposit rates
that’s the way to secure payment, not higher interest rates

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 06:25:18

jmf:

Always enjoy your blog, you have keen insight… (and nice graphics)

Comment by jmf
2007-03-19 07:26:49

thanks very much

here is the direct link to the hussman post

to me a must read! ….and the perfect “anti spin”

http://www.hussman.net/rsi/fedfundscut.htm

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 07:39:50

Here’s a beauty from your countryman, Dr. Kurt Richebacher:

Many times, to glimpse the truth, one has to be on the outside, looking in…

The Ponzi U.S. Bubble Economy

Trying to assess the U.S. economy’s prospects, the first thing to realize is that past cyclical experience offers no guidance to the present downturn because it has completely different causes and also a completely different pattern.

All past recessions had their main cause in monetary tightening. As soon as the Federal Reserve loosened its shackles, the economy promptly took off again, propelled by pent-up demand. For the first time in history, the U.S. economy went into recession against the backdrop of most rampant money and credit growth.

Manifestly, the forces depressing the economy this time are radically different from past experience. The typical, major imbalance in post-war business cycles has usually been in inventories. To correct it, retailers and manufacturers temporarily sold from stock, depressing production. Once the stocks were down to desired levels, production came into its right again. At the heart of the regular V-shaped business cycles was the inventory cycle.

In contrast, the present downturn has its brunt in the combination of a profit and capital-spending crisis. At the same time, there has accumulated an array of economic and financial dislocations that tend to depress the economy in many ways, such as extremely poor profits, badly ravaged balance sheets, a variety of asset bubbles in different stages of development, excessive leverage in the whole financial system and shrinking cash flow. There is nothing normal anymore in the U.S. economy and its financial system.

For the old economists, investment in tangible assets — factories, commercial buildings and machinery — was paramount in creating both economic growth and wealth. It creates demand, employment and income as the capital goods are produced. And with their installment, all these new buildings, plant and equipment create increased supply along with increasing employment and income with increased productivity.

The United States has always been a low-savings and low-investment economy. Putting it in reverse: a high-consumption economy. But all three went to unprecedented extremes over the past several years. Savings and investment have been run down to atrociously low levels that are typical for underdeveloped countries.

To repeat: Investment in tangible assets is paramount in creating everything that is decisive in generating our wealth and raising our living standards. Given the low levels of saving and investment in the United States, American policymakers and economists in recent years have elevated productivity growth to the single most important achievement of an economy. But just by itself, productivity growth creates only unemployment. It is the normally associated capital spending that makes for the necessary, simultaneous demand and employment growth.

This simple recognition — gross lack of saving and capital formation — is really at the root of our controversial and highly critical view of the U.S. economy’s sanity and vitality. True, its growth rate has been the highest among the industrial countries for years. But it has all the time been economic growth of the most miserable quality. The striking hallmarks of this extremely poor quality were collapsing savings, low rates of business fixed investment, a profit carnage that began at the height of the boom, exploding consumer and business debts and an exploding trade deficit.

Today’s economists have at their disposal information in quantity and speed as never before. But reading numerous reports, we have the impression that very few are making use of it.

Particularly shocking in this respect were the immediate euphoric reports about growth acceleration in the second quarter.

During the 1960–70s, by the way, the U.S. accumulated on average about 1.5 dollars of additional debt for each dollar of additional GDP. Just extrapolate this escalating relationship between the use of debt and economic activity. And think of it: the GDP growth of today is tomorrow a thing of the past, while the debts incurred remain.

Plainly, Greenspan’s policy has collapsed into uncontrolled money and debt creation that has rapidly diminishing returns on economic activity. The late economist Hyman P. Mynsky would call this a Ponzi economy, where debt payments on outstanding and soaring indebtedness are no longer met out of current income, but through new borrowing. Soaring unpaid interests become capitalized.

P.S. We keep asking the question of the American economists: Are they providing deliberate misinformation or simply performing slipshod work? In our view, as usual, the latter rings true.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-19 09:20:27

“The United States has always been a low-savings and low-investment economy.”

I don’t believe history supports that statement. Consider the years from 1945-1960: high investment (built the freeway system and the subways, not to mention the post-WWII U.S. manufacturing base).

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-19 09:21:49

“subways”

Oops — misfired; meant to write “suburbs.” But come to think of it, maybe some “subways” as well (though the BART system came later…)

 
 
Comment by ljaycox
2007-03-19 11:50:03

Hussman did not have a very good year last year, but his record is good and as a non-financial person, I realized last night that my only stock market exposure right now is in his funds. I have been reading him for quite some time–I think he is as clear and non-BS thinker and writer that I can think of. He is the “Zen Master” type investor–I admire him, but he is long term, but it is my IRA anyway, so I have 20 yrs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-19 09:33:51

“wasn´t there a crash a few weeks ago… just afew points shy of a new ath!”

We live in the era of short financial market memory…

Comment by jmf
2007-03-19 10:11:24

i have to correct you…

“ultra short” memory :-)

 
 
 
Comment by hobokenite
2007-03-19 05:47:44

Somebody posted a link on here a few months ago for a website where you could get demographic info (including income data) on any given zip code. Does anyone know what the website was? I forgot to bookmark it.

Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2007-03-19 06:06:23

http://www.melissadata.com

incomes by zip is the most useful.

Comment by Max
2007-03-19 07:06:58

That site is kick-ass, thank you very much!

 
Comment by hobokenite
2007-03-19 11:53:20

That’s it. Bookmarked now.

Thanks!

 
Comment by patient renter
2007-03-19 11:54:42

Are the AGIs listed there for individuals or the household?

 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-03-19 06:45:52

I had mentioned at one point a link to demo info by zip thru Foreclosure.com. I checked it out before posting that and now you have to become a subscriber to get to that info.

Realtor.com still has a similar link:

http://tinyurl.com/2ky8yo

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-03-19 06:59:21

Posted something that may show up later.

Try this for demo info by zip:

http://tinyurl.com/2ky8yo

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 05:55:54

Was talking for a few hours to a fellow goldbug and we talked about the gold/gasoline ratios, which is how he values gold.

He related in 1967, when he got his driver’s license, gas was like 27.9 or 28.9 Cents, per gallon, (I request we have congress do away with that absurd 9/10’s of a Cent, on the end) a $20 Gold Coin (about 97% of a Troy Ounce, in content) could buy around 125 Gallons of gas.

Today, that very same $20 Gold Coin will buy you around 210 gallons of gas.

Comment by packman
2007-03-19 06:18:11

2 years ago that gold coin would buy 100 gallons of gas. It varies a lot.

Actually I own a fair amount of gold - just saying that anecdotal stats like this are relatively meaningless. One could also state that in 1980 you could buy 500 gallons of gas with that gold coin, but only 210 today.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 06:32:35

Not a good stat?

Throw out 1980 and it’s remarkably prescient…

Gold @ it’s lows of $250′ish, would have bought you around 165 gallons of gas, some 6 years ago.

Comment by packman
2007-03-19 07:10:31

Again though I would say that 6 years ago we were seeing extreme lows in both gold and gas - never to be seen again.

Throwing out what IMO are unnatural peaks and valleys, in the 70’s (aside from the brief shortage) gas was around .50, gold was around $150 - so about 300 gallons per 1oz of gold. In the 2000’s we’re running about $2.50 for gas and around $500 for gold - so about 200 gallons per 1oz. Even at today’s $650 relative highs for gold it’s about 260 gallons.

In general - gold isn’t really that good as an investment, unless you can really time the market. I have it as an extreme hedge - i.e. if/when the SHTF. Thus if the SNHTF (N = never), I’ll keep it forever and pass it on to my heirs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by WAman
2007-03-19 07:00:51

Where I live it would be 260 gallons.

Comment by Jasper
2007-03-19 07:23:14

Personally id rather have the gallon of gold than a case of gas.

Comment by ahansen
2007-03-19 11:12:32

lol

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by sm_landlord
2007-03-19 09:11:15

An ounce of gold would buy 228 gallons of gas in SoCal at today’s prices.

Comment by lavi d
2007-03-19 12:42:08

An ounce of gold would buy 228 gallons of gas in SoCal at today’s prices.

Yeah, but it’s a bitch forcing it into the card-reader

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Sic Semper Realtor
2007-03-19 06:04:05

Some thoughts here from MN:

I know a civil engineer who does a lot of epert witness work. I was talking to him this weekend and said he should really look into other states where there was so much shoddy workmanship and have class action suits. He is going to - after he gets done with the 10 types of those cases he has pending here in MN, all against national builders.

Second, regarding the bailout, will Dodd try to include the people who have already lost their house and it is now owned by someone else? Otherwise, that is another group of people who will be against a bailout.

This is ugly and getting worse. Scheudenfrued (sp?) at its best.

Comment by seattle price drop
2007-03-19 12:55:44

I asked the same question a few days back Sic Semper, as I have neighbors who lost their home a couple years ago due to an exploding ARM.

They had a 30 year fixed and were advised into an ARM a few years later, leading to the loss.

I’m sure they’d love to get their home back, or at least be handsomely compensated.

Dodd’s a moron to even be suggesting such a thing, as in any pol who dares to go there.

BTW, did everybody see the latest post up on the “bubblemarketstracking”site?

It’s a very damning expose on these stupid banks and lenders, a couple guys who went back consecutive times and got tons of money out of their home. One of them just out of bankruptcy.

Can anybody provide a link? I’m a computer moron.

Steven Colbert material if I ever saw it.

 
 
Comment by IllinoisBob
2007-03-19 06:12:34

From the WSJ
Economy Can Withstand More Mortgage Foreclosures

About 1.1 million foreclosures are likely to result from jumps in monthly payments on adjustable-rate home-mortgage loans made in 2004 through 2006, according to a study by First American CoreLogic.

Christopher Cagan, director of research at the real-estate-information concern based in Santa Ana, Calif., said those foreclosures are likely to occur over six to seven years and won’t be enough to damage the national economy. (Financial markets could be hurt, however. See Abreast of the Market.)

Dr. Cagan analyzed 8.4 million adjustable-rate loans made during those three years and estimated that 13% of them, totaling $326 billion, will end in foreclosures. After lenders resell those properties, the total losses for lenders or investors holding the loans will be $113 billion, he estimated. That is about 1% of total U.S. home-mortgage loans outstanding.
Oh spread out over 5 or 6 years HA Try 2 to 3. Id say more like 30% of the loans will fail, (we are at 10 - 15 % right now), and with real estate prices falling the banks will get away with a 30% haircut (100%+ LTV on top of it too) ? With all the subprime mortgage companies imploding and more to come, Dr. Cagan will be in the same league as David L. The studies from the Center for Responsible Lending directly dispute his findings.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117426390363540957.html?mod=home_whats_news_us

Comment by flatffplan
2007-03-19 06:27:23

13% ?
it will higher that that
15% failure is par on subprime- this time it’s different

 
Comment by John Fontain
2007-03-19 07:09:03

It also says:

“The estimates are based on an assumption that average home prices will remain about level with the December 2006 level over the next five years.”

“If prices drop 10%, the number of foreclosures would jump to 1.9 million, Dr. Cagan projected.”

This means that if prices drop 10%, which will easily happen, 23% of all borrowers with ARMs issued in 2004 to 2006 will go into foreclosure.

 
 
Comment by dba
2007-03-19 06:12:38

“Centex let go of all the AE’s and is closing a retail center….doubled the REO staff(per my neighbor he runs the TX division)”

Nice post about Centex from the creditboards mortgage pro’s forum

 
Comment by WestSideGeorge
2007-03-19 06:23:35

So if I refinanced to 80% LTV in 2003, and then did a cash out refi to 100% in 2006 (by which time my credit score had detoriated), is this combined mortgage deemed to be 4/5 prime and 1/5 subprime in the statistics we see? Could this be the source of these “subprime is only 6% of loans” type statements?

Comment by flatffplan
2007-03-19 06:30:19

good point
every loan is subprime if taken out after peak ,early 04
cause it’s on RE that’s underwater, trapped

 
 
Comment by edhopper
2007-03-19 06:30:33

A very long, but very important article by Nouriel Roubini;

http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/184125

Comment by John M
2007-03-19 06:48:40

It’s a three coffee j’accuse.

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-19 09:17:05

If ‘everybody’ needs a bailout, where will the money come from? Asian savers? Future generations of American savers? Because last time I checked, the U.S. savings rate was negative, and we were already collectively up to our necks in debt. And renters (a group who might logically be asked to pay for the bailout of the myriad underwater homeowners) generally have no money — that is why they are renters :-)

“The sub-prime and overall mortgage carnage is now likely to lead to a financial crisis whose cleanup and bailout costs will make the S&L bailout bill look like spare change. We are only at the beginning of this fallout but, already, several proposals and bills in Congress have been submitted to help millions of sub-prime homeowners on the verge of bankruptcy and foreclosure. The prospect of millions of homeowners thrown homeless on the street is already shaking politicians of every stripe. The relatively modest bailout envisaged by the first bills currently proposed in Congress will mushroom into a much bigger fiscal bailout of homeowners, borrowers and lenders once the garbage of sub-prime, near-prime and pseudo-prime toxic waste spreads around the economy and likely leads to a hard landing recession that will cause a much bigger financial and banking crisis.”

Comment by lavi d
2007-03-19 12:49:38

If ‘everybody’ needs a bailout, where will the money come from?

I have a feeling it’s going to come from singles. People who are married are more likely to own homes and are a more palatable demographic for the political parties.

There will probably be some sort of marriage-family-based “rescue” plan. And who could disagree with that? That’s what housing industry America is built on - families.

 
Comment by seattle price drop
2007-03-19 13:04:05

I really wish people would quit saying these folks will be thrown out on the street, “homeless”.

Nothing could be further from the truth. They’ll be living in a rental, paying a fraction of what they paid on their mortgage.

Did Roubini really say that?

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 14:25:23

er,

The average American adult has an ongoing credit card ballance of around $8k, just where oh where are they gonna get the do re me, to pull it off?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-19 09:38:26

Less govt regulation makes it easier for Wall Street to steal the rest of the country blind.

“In the meanwhile powerful financial interests that repeat the mantra – or better the proof-less dogma - of unregulated free markets and do not like any – even sensible – supervision and regulation of the financial system will happily blame government action – rather than their own reckless greed and stupidity - for this disaster while happily demanding and receiving billions in bailout funds from the same government that they so happily disdain. This will be the most appalling form of corporate welfare: privatize the profits in good times and socialize the losses in bad times.”

Comment by Mark
2007-03-19 10:04:00

So if more regulation is better, why not regulate everything completely? It worked so well for the USSR….

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 11:09:55

Actually the USSR was much better prepared for a blowout, than we were…

http://www.cluborlov.com/ClubOrlov/ConfSlides/index.html

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Kane
2007-03-19 10:27:21

And to even think that now, after 25 years of the reckless lunacy of “trickle down” economics, there is still the dumb, blind and misled who insist we maintain the course.

So so sad.

 
 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2007-03-19 06:44:26

porque’ ?
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SVM

the pest guys and lwn care guys are sckin wind and that’s a fact Jack
I don’t get some LBO choices

Comment by mrquoi
2007-03-19 15:10:41

Someone’s gotta clean up messes and companies prefer to use a service rather than a homeowner paying Juanita under the table.

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 06:49:10

I’m a history geek, always have been, always will…

I can look back to World War 2 history and I know exactly what happened and why and how. But imagine how it must have been, receiving the news piecemeal, about the war, in real time?

In many ways, we are chronicling the end of an era. The 21st Century will be upon us soon. It already showed up chronologically.

Comment by Hoz
2007-03-19 08:48:18

Moi aussi! You are right in that we are chronicling the end of an era. The question is what comes after. In the 1970’s, when inflation was in the teens, some friends and I were discussing the Greek golden age (as well as other empires golden ages) and trying to compare the US historical development against previous empires in an attempt to determine its “golden age” . We felt then that future historians would consider the US “golden age” to be somewhere between ~ 1921 - 1965. Anything was possible, there was tremendous wealth, low inflation, we owned the world and had the highest standard of living the world had ever seen, we had trust in our government, etc.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 09:03:34

I was born in 1961, right in the middle of the cold war, (having the middle name “Vladimir” was an interesting challenge) and I grew up with the space age. It shaped us, told us that anything was possible and we ate it up.

If you had asked 1,000 6 year old boys in 1967 what they would like to be when they grew up?, probably around 843 of us, would have opted to be astronauts.

For me, everything changed with Watergate, when I was 13.

The slow steady descent, had begun.

Comment by albrt
2007-03-19 09:25:19

I was born in 1963 and it is amazing to me that all the young people of our generation gave up on the space program so easily. I am aware of the arguments against spending money on the space program, but looking back to when I was 12 or 13 it would have been inconceivable that the United States would basically give up and have such a pitiful space program by the time I was 40.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-03-19 10:38:57

1961 here
I never understood where our country saw any ROI for the space program….except maybe SDI. (outside of computer development,Tang, and velcro, of course)

In regards to our current exploration of Mars and I just can’t fathom why a bankrupt country would not a cut such a program in an instant. Seems like the reasons people give sound oddly similar to those offered when asking an FB why he purchased a Hummer.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 10:45:38

The Monday that ’ssshrubery (sadly, what passes for a leader in an era of lessened expectactions…) announced that we were going to Mars in 2020, (mad dog?) came after the Sunday when Paul O’Neil spilled his guts on 60 minutes…

They couldn’t counter the early devastating testimony of an honest man, so they trumped out a big story, to effectively block his tales of woe.

How much have you heard about our Mars plans, since?

 
Comment by cassiopeia
2007-03-19 12:06:56

We felt then that future historians would consider the US “golden age” to be somewhere between ~ 1921 - 1965.

According to Hobsbawm (I highly recommend his history of the 20th century) the fifties were a golden age for the whole world. At no previous moment in history had so many people had access to so much wealth (by wealth I also mean education, health care, etc.). That was the moment when our civilization really peaked. The Cold War even helped the West become more “compassionate”, if only to counter the attraction of the communist ideology. From then on, it all started to slide downward. What we are chronicling is all the anecdotal evidence of the decadence. There’s just not enough history buffs out there, so people don’t realize what’s happening. Oh, well, it had to happen some time. I just never thought it would happen in my lifetime. I thought it would take longer. Also, if history serves as an example, we are headed for an “in between” kind of period, until a new order finds its way. Those are always the toughest times. Aladinsane is ready for those…

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-03-19 13:20:50

Good points especially “it had to happen some time. I just never thought it would happen in my lifetime. I thought it would take longer.” All previous collapses took centuries, not less than 60 years. Is it rapid communication that accelerated this? And the news that “About one-third of the people living in the national’s capital are functionally illiterate, compared with about one-fifth nationally, according to a report on the District of Columbia.”( AP -Yahoo) I remember that in the 50s early 60s it was ~90% literate. Only Iceland had a higher literacy rate.

Does that also mean that 1/3 of congress is illiterate? LOL

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 13:47:51

Ever wonder why Denny’s has photos of every last food item on their menu?

I’m thinking the real # of f.i.’s, is closer to 50%…

 
Comment by cassiopeia
2007-03-19 14:07:14

Hoz, I thought that by its very openness and flexibility, this empire had more wind in it than others that preceded it. I was wrong, maybe its the communications. Things have just accelerated. Our generation lives in a different world from that of our parents, as for our kids, only God knows what’s in store for them.

Aladinsane, one of the Argentine founding fathers, the one who set up the whole education system (which used to be good), once said: Educate the people, if you don’t do it because you care for them, do it because you are afraid of them. Boy, was he right. I’m totally convinced that as the education system goes, so goes the country. Having read all we have about FB’s with no basic arithmetic skills, do you still have any doubts about that?

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 14:16:43

The last time education was a priority was 1957, after the Soviets shocked us with Sputnik and we decided we needed to play catch up, in a big way…

Get ready for “The Blame Game”, as this mess unfolds~

Who do you think gets singled out for the most criticism?

 
Comment by ahansen
2007-03-19 15:49:00

You all seem to be assuming that the current population of the United States actually IS educable….

 
Comment by cassiopeia
2007-03-19 15:58:58

Aladinsane, if you have been reading the papers for the last 20 years, you probably know we have been playing the blame game for decades. We have blamed tax and spend Democrats, conservatives covering for Wall Street, immigration, etc. etc. The housing bubble is just another event in this mess. Who gets to blame for it? Like I said before, don’t blame the pig, blame the one who feeds him.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by IllinoisBob
2007-03-19 06:52:10

OT, more pain for the US economy coming.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6465763.stm
China announces big planes plan
AVIC unveils ARJ-21 regional plane
AVIC unveiled its ARJ-21 regional plane last week
China’s government has given the go-ahead to plans for the country to design and build passenger planes which can carry more than 150 people.

The move, to compete with Airbus and Boeing, was a longer-term priority of China, it said.

China Aviation Industry Corporation (AVIC) has started building a regional plane, the ARJ-21, which will carry between 78 and 105 people.

No time-frame has been set out for developing the larger plane.
However, the bigger jets are not expected to be built before 2020.

Comment by lost in utah
2007-03-19 08:58:06

Not to worry, gas will be too expensive to fly them by then.

 
Comment by seattle price drop
2007-03-19 13:14:50

The real joke is that so many expect it will take China TWENTY YEARS to achieve their objective. LOL.

Have these people learned nothing??!!

For the past 8 years, I’ve had visions of the Chinese pulling apart Boeing planes piece by piece in some far flung field in Xinjiang Province, just so they can learn how to rebuild them on their own.

If it takes them 20 years to catch up to Boeing, I’ll eat my hat.

 
 
Comment by packman
2007-03-19 06:57:19

Accredited (LEND) in danger of being delisted:

http://tinyurl.com/2xhrqg

“NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Subprime mortgage lender Accredited Home Lendres (LEND) said Monday that it is in talks with a third party to provide it financing and boost its liquidity. The firm did not say who it’s talking to, but said it has hired an adviser to help it. The company also said it is the target of a class action lawsuit that alleges the firm issued materially false and misleading statements regarding its business and financial results. Accredited denied the allegation and said it will defend the case vigorously. And, the company said it’s been told by the NASDAQ Stock Market that its shares are subject to delisting because it has not filed its annual report.

Not delisted yet though - in fact is up slightly today.

Comment by packman
2007-03-19 09:07:32

Oops - spoke too soon - now down 10%

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-19 09:08:51

I guess GS better hurry up and snap them up. Or will GS wait until after delisting, to get the real fire sale deal?

 
 
Comment by kckid
2007-03-19 07:11:15

I noticed a large lumber yard on my way to work was empty today.
Anyone elso noticing this in their area?

 
Comment by txchick57
Comment by PDXrenter
2007-03-19 08:53:10

Text in case it evaporates from CL:
——-
This Texas based firm has immediate openings for associates in the area of construction defect litigation. They are looking for experienced associates who want to handle litigation while working in a family-friendly environment. Excellent benefits are available. Kinney Recruiting is a leading provider of recruitment and placement services for lawyers.

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2007-03-19 07:17:56

Per The Real Deal in New York — kickbacks by mortgage brokers to real estate brokers increasing.

http://www.therealdeal.net/breaking_news/2007/03/16/1174085186.php

Comment by dba
2007-03-19 08:49:25

manhattan you have the few big players like Halstead Realty. I think there are 4 or 5 other major players. Out in the boroughs there are hundreds of mom and pop RE offices and agents and in the last 2 years they all sprung up to get in on the gold rush. by 2010 not many will survive since there are too many in the first place. it’s like all the nail salons springing up all over the place because people think you can charge $7 a nail job and mint money. no when there is a nail salon on every block you can’t.

 
 
Comment by Justin
2007-03-19 07:35:01

Think they’re going to have any trouble selling this house?

http://www.corndogday.com/node/899

 
Comment by leosdad
Comment by leosdad
2007-03-19 08:49:38

ok, ok, I meant this one here:
http://www.sacbee.com/103/story/140202.html

 
 
Comment by kckid
2007-03-19 08:53:46

http://bubbletracking.blogspot.com/2007/03/mr-senator-dodd-subprime-victims-right.html
Saturday, March 17, 2007
“Mr. Senator Dodd, subprime victims right here, dude!! Help!!!”
Eddie Oruna and Kerman Rogers are two sub-prime borrowers featured by the LA Times on March 15th. The article describes them as thirtysomethings with spotty credit who purchased their Chino Hills home in 2002 and ‘financed it to the hilt.’

Per the article the two are now rather on edge. Looks like the interest rate on their two loans recently jumped more than 2 percentage points and they’re struggling to make monthly payments. And it appears the two are going to have a hard time refinance into a new loan they can afford.

Just how did Eddie and Kerman get to this point? Our anon contributor came through for us once again and provided the detail:

In 1996, Eddie filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. There were other run ins with the law and other small claims filed against him. So yes, a spotty history indeed.

By 6/2002, Eddie and Kerman decided to buy a Chino Hills home together. They scrambled together $150 for the down payment while First Franklin overlooked Eddie’s bankruptcy and agreed to finance the purchase with a $233,900 first and a $58,450 second.

A year later on 5/2003, Eddie and Kerman were in need of some extra spending money. They went to Argent Mortgage and refi’d for $349,000, cashing out $56,650 in the process.

By 8/2004 Eddie and Kerman have realized they no longer need to work. They can just keep refinance from their house, use that money to pay for the mortgage, and use the rest to live on. Of course, the more they refi the plushier their lives become. And so they hooked up with Greenpoint Mortgage and refi’d for $432,000, cashing out $83,000.

But to really live it up in Chino Hills, $140,000 in cash out within 3 years ain’t gonna do it! Eddie and Kerman went looking for more cash-money in 6/2005. They found it with Greenpoint in the form of a HELOC for $62,000.

Nine more months pass on by and Eddie and Kerman is itching for some more cash. Washington Mutual came through this time with another HELOC of $72,000 on 3/2006.

For good measure, on 4/2006, Eddie and Kerman got another $24,314 in loan from Silverstone Financial.

And so just 6 years out from a bankruptcy and carrying $150 in down payment, Eddie was able to team up with Kerman and buy a house that just kept on giving, giving, and give some more. Within less than 5 years, these guys ran up the mortgage debt on their Avalon Ct. home all the way to $530,000, and that’s assuming the $72,000 from WaMu paid off the $62,000 from Greenpoint.

Anon contributor calls these guys “the perfect poster child for what is wrong with the industry.” He also made this observation, “these guys don’t even need jobs! They can just get cash every year from the housing ATM!”

I couldn’t have said it better myself.

Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-19 09:31:45

Do you think it has dawned on Senators Dodd and Clinton that their subprime bailout proposals may help aid and abet those who make their living through lending fraud?

 
 
Comment by octal77
2007-03-19 09:13:46

Did anyone watch Ebert and Roper last night?

They reviewed a film called “Maxed Out: Hard TImes,
Easy Credit and the Era of Predatory Lending”

Has anyone viewed the film? Comments?

Comment by GetStucco
Comment by octal77
2007-03-19 09:57:48

GetStucco:

Thank you very much for finding this link.

I just now viewed.

It is more terrifying than any horror film I’ve every seen.

Is it possible there is anyone left out there who
has doubts about the underpinnings of the
current sub-prime blowup?

If so, just have them view this trailer.

Financial crack cocaine at its worst.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-03-19 11:23:00

They shred our mortgage checks….

I’m ready to take my pitchfork and march on Washington. And they wonder why some Americans decide to aid and abet our enemies.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by KIA
2007-03-19 13:57:04

Just wait until the push to help the newly homeless starts. Here’s the scenario as it is:

Hard Worker, 2002: Work, work.
FB 2002: “Woohoo, my house is going up!”
HW, 2003: Work, work.
FB 2003: *crusies by in Hummer, laughs at HW “Woohoo! Just took out equity!”
HW, 2004: Work, work.
FB 2004: *throws beercan at HW from new jetski* “Woohoo! Look at me jet-skiing from the money I got from a HELOC!”
HW, 2005: Work, work.
FB 2005: “WOOHOO!!! Look at me partying and living beyond my means! This is great and it ain’t never gonna stop!!!”
HW 2006: Work, work.
FB 2006: “Uh… wow. Is that my new mortgage payment?”
HW 2007: Work, work. Considers buying FB’s jetski, but not even at half-price.
FB 2007: *denied refi, full sale impossible, payments continuing to mount* “Eeep!”

Now the important step is what happens next. If FB has his way, it’ll be bail-out city. If the market has it’s way, FB will be living beside the road, while HW drives by in the ten year old family sedan. Bleeding hearts everywhere will decry how unfair it is for FB to be homeless, and how cruel HW is to refuse “charity” to “one in need.”

Is it unfair or is it justice? Obviously, I think it’s justice, and cannot and should not be tampered with. I firmly believe in the karma police, and if they’re not around, it’s up to me to enforce the law of karma. When you willfully destroy your finances through ridiculous overconsumption, you should suffer. It is your punishment for unwise behavior. If you don’t suffer, you won’t learn, and you’ll do it all over again.

HW 2008: *Shakes finger at FB* “No! Bad FB!” *Rubs nose of FB in mess* “I’m not cleaning that up! You’re going to have to live and sleep in it until you learn better!”

 
 
Comment by Mystry62
2007-03-19 11:49:32

I read the book this weekend….very interesting… he wrote the book after he finished filiming. I’m waiting for the movie to hit my area. I don’t quite agree with his politics, but you can’t argue with him on the credit issues.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 09:41:13

100 year old folks are pretty scarce… We celebrate their centennials, because it’s been a relatively rare occassion…

There’s gonna be a bunch of 100 year old boomers~

Comment by mrquoi
2007-03-19 15:29:18

Not if Medicare implodes. Lowered life expectancy would be the horrible outcome of no money for treating heart problems, cancer, stroke, etc.

 
 
Comment by VaBeyatch in Virginia Beach
2007-03-19 09:47:08

It appears there are a number of people here that used to read FC.com… Does this mean the bubble blogs attract the same type of people that were attracted to that site? Are we somehow all joined together in some sort of bond, perhaps doom & gloom? Or we witnessed the .com implosion and are back to watch the next one, as the general public seemed to learn nothing by the last bubble?

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 09:51:44

fc.com was hopelessly juvenile, compared to the brain power exhibited here, on a daily basis.

 
 
Comment by VaBeyatch in Virginia Beach
2007-03-19 09:52:21

So I helped a friend move furniture into his new house this weekend (While moving my overly large computer collection to storage from the office I rent this weekend). Several friends recently bought houses, knowing my take on things. They figure they will be there for a while. Plus they have wives.

EVERYWHERE in Chesapeake, Virginia (part of Hampton Roads) there were for sale signs. I drove around where I grew up, and all the new McMansions (700K+) was absolutely astounding. I did notice a few of them had trucks parked in the driveway that would hint that a member of the family was in construction (pickups with ladder racks and what not). A number of them for-sale, and a number of areas where all the trees have been cleared and curbs layed out for new roads for new developments, but no actual buildings have been put up. Or in a few cases, 1 or 2 houses at the start of a neighborhood. I wonder if these will be abandoned? I miss those trees. Also, there was a large number of FSBO…. which don’t show up in MLS / HousingTracker / REIN. I wonder how many will need to sell the ir FSBOs, but are trying to avoid the money overhead of a realtor? Perhaps they can’t afford the fees to break even.

Comment by Carolina W
2007-03-19 12:12:36

We went to a handful of open houses on Sunday in our area’s “land of future forclosures”, Simpsonville, SC. This is a sprawling suburb of Greenville with tons of open land, trailers, transplants, and road rage. One neighborhood of custom homes built in the past year has about 15 homes built out of 40 lots planned. Price range 550K to 900K, 3 have sold, 12 finished and available. Long faced realtor asked us to sign in at one house, the log was empty and it was 15 minutes before the three hour open house was over (we failed to sign). Someone is paying some friendly bankers some interest here!

Oh, and next door lies a similarly priced new neighborhood with swim & tennis that will eventually have over 100 homes!! Ambien, anyone?

 
 
Comment by france42
2007-03-19 09:56:31

yesterday in local market observations, i posted:

“went to an open house three doors down from my rowhouse in a desirable nyc borough ‘hood. i’m renting for 2300 + heat and my rental is in stellar condition. the house on sale, an exact replica of our floorplan, is in bad shape. the floors need to be redone, there’s no balcony as on ours, the tiles in the kitchen and baths are all moldy. i’d say there’s about 100k worth of work. it’s a moderate-sized single family. they’re selling it as a “possible two-family” for 789k. if you put 20% down, that’s a monthly mortgage payment of 3850 (if you can get 6.25% interest).

what for?”

i’ve since looked up the property in ’shark, and the owner (who claimed he’d bought the house about 10 years ago) bought it in 2004 for 333k. last june he refinanced for 177k. he’d told me that he’s moving in about a month ’cause he’d bought another house.

and they claim that nyc is *different?*

we have not seen the end of the debacle, for sure!

Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-03-19 11:34:54

A friend shared with me this weekend that they are moving back to Chicago.

I said Can you do me a favor? Can you just spend a few times reading this blog before you buy anything?

Her answer: Oh, it’s too late. We found a home, put an offer on it that was accepted and we’re closing Easter weekend.

Is your house on the market yet? No

Later in the conversation:
We were thinking of picking up a condo in the city for like weekend get aways. I wanted to buy something and close on it the same day but (husband) said that would be almost impossible to do timewise.

Her husband reportedly did get a 50% increase in pay so I’m sure they can pull it off.

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-19 10:14:23

How can one diversify when all stocks move in lockstep? Quite a conundrum there…

http://www.marketwatch.com/tools/marketsummary/

 
Comment by AZtoORtoCOtoOR
2007-03-19 11:01:03

What I hope to buy for $500k in a couple of years:http://phoenix.craigslist.org/rfs/293073569.html

The mortgage on this house is a cool $1m. http://156.42.40.50/UnOfficialDocs/pdf/20061659409.pdf

The amount of the mortgages on these McMansions continue to convince me that some are headed for serious pain and the patient, prudent ones will be rewarded.

Comment by AZtoORtoCOtoOR
2007-03-19 11:39:57

My apologies for the 2nd link not working. I will figure out how to get the links to work in the future. For now, one will have to go here: http://www.maricopa.gov/Assessor/GIS/Map.html

Enter in the address, get the owner’s information and then search for the recorded documents under the name found here: http://recorder.maricopa.gov/recdocdata

To make life easier, filter on the date found on the map information and the name may be different - middle inital may or may not be part of the name.

 
 
Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-03-19 11:07:18

Herb Greenberg discovers option arms…that’s so summer of 2006 around HBB. Oh, well…

http://blogs.marketwatch.com/greenberg/2007/03/beyond_subprime.html

Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-19 11:46:21

If these big name media guys read a bit more here, they could avoid seeming hopelessly out of date…

Comment by tweedle-dee (not dumb)
2007-03-19 19:17:50

They are too busy reassuring the market that everything is OK, Goldilocks rules, etc. Actually, Greenberg tends to be more realistic than the rest.

 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-19 11:44:03

The subprime meltdown tis merely a flesh wound…
————————————————————————————
Wall Street reassures on subprime, but there are skeptics
By Jed Horowitz
Last Update: 8:07 AM ET Mar 19, 2007

(This article was originally published Friday.)
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — The U.S. subprime mortgage crisis hasn’t spread to other fixed-income markets, investors still crave mortgage-backed securities because loan standards have tightened, and - why worry anyway? - since subprime loans are a mere cog in investment banks’ profit machine.

These messages are brought to you by Wall Street, which has a thriving business packaging and repackaging U.S. residential mortgages into securities sold to investors. As Bear Stearns Cos., Lehman Brothers Holdings and Goldman Sachs Group reported relatively strong first-quarter earnings this week, they sought to reassure investors that they, at least, are well insulated from the problems spawned by the flood of loans in recent years to borrowers with weak credit records.

Subprime loans, they said, make up a sliver of their revenue and losses appear to have run their course. What’s more, brokerage firm executives appear eager to buy more subprime assets that lenders are ditching at fire-sale prices as Wall Street and other financiers force them to the brink of bankruptcy.

“The dislocation will only provide opportunity for us,” Bear Stearns Chief Financial Officer Samuel Molinaro said on a conference call Thursday. The firm reported an 8% jump in first-quarter earnings on the back of a 27% jump in revenue at the fixed-income trading unit, which includes its mortgage businesses.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/wall-street-reassures-subprime-there/story.aspx?guid=%7B148EFF07%2D01C5%2D4C2B%2DA17E%2DC040F23FBF81%7D

 
Comment by OB_Tom
2007-03-19 11:48:20

CME San Diego Housing Futures have dropped quite a bit lately. The Feb.’08 number has dropped to 224.60 from 231.80 at the beginning of the month. The highest number the San Diego futures hit was 248.40 on 09/21/06 for Nov. 06 prices. That’s a 10% drop so far…..

 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2007-03-19 13:36:27

It seems Mr. Dodd isn’t the only pol with something to say about this matter. Here’s a link to Ron Paul’s weekly newsletter for March 19, 2007. As usual he doesn’t mince words about who he thinks created this mess.
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst031907.htm

 
Comment by waiting_in_la
2007-03-19 13:59:46

This just in fron the CFC message board :

http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_C/threadview?m=tm&bn=3223&tid=41217&mid=41217&tof=1&frt=2

Some of our theories may be coming true.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 14:09:58

Galt, California homes @ $350k?

Who is John Galt?

 
Comment by tweedle-dee (not dumb)
2007-03-19 19:15:55

$350K @ 6% = 21,000 a year or $1750 a month, for interest only. How did they expect it to stay at $1400 a month ?

$2800 per month on a monthly income of $4K is 70% of their gross income on the mortgage payment !

I like how he didn’t know about it until he saw it on CNN ! What grade to they teach simple interest in ? Grade 8 ? Wouldn’t one tend to figure something like that out before signing on a $350K house ?

Of course it sounds like they don’t have any equity in it…

 
 
Comment by Karl
2007-03-19 14:12:09

From Wisconsin / Capital Times - March 17 - Not sure if you have this one yet…

Home sales, prices shrink
http://www.madison.com/tct/business/index.php?ntid=124428

 
Comment by dude
2007-03-19 14:48:07

“LANCASTER - A man advertising new homes while standing by the side of a street was shot and killed Sunday afternoon, according to detectives. Detective Bob Kenney of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department said that a solitary male victim was shot to death around 12:08 p.m. Sunday near the corner of 45th Street West and Avenue K in Lancaster”

Flipped out FB or frustrated renter? I’d be looking at the list of buyers in that particular project over the last couple years.

Comment by dude
2007-03-19 14:59:57

Click on my name to go to the article.

 
Comment by mrquoi
2007-03-19 15:39:32

In Lancaster you can get shot for wearing the wrong color shirt in the wrong place and probably the poor sign twirler had no idea. Sucks though.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-19 18:15:06

A friend of mine took up forced residence in Palmdale, (he paid $118k in 1990, it was worth around $75k for a lot of years) couldn’t leave (he broke free in 2003 and escaped to Colorado) and he used to refer to Palmdale as:

“Where Jesus lost his sandals”

 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-19 16:06:31

Who is Fortress, and why would they go bottom fishing before the dust has settled on the subprime implosion? It seems rather like buying San Francisco real estate in 1906, before the post-earthquake fires had even burned out. Did the govt put them up to this shopping spree?
———————————————————————————-
Newcastle to buy $1.7 bln subprime portfolio
Mortgage crisis has created opportunity, Fortress-backed REIT says
By Alistair Barr, MarketWatch
Last Update: 6:27 PM ET Mar 19, 2007

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — Newcastle Investment Corp., a real estate investment trust managed by hedge fund giant Fortress Investment Group, is stepping into the subprime mortgage market as others are fleeing a credit crunch.

Newcastle said late Friday that it agreed to buy a $1.7 billion portfolio of roughly 7,300 subprime mortgages. The deal is expected to close during the next 30 days, but Newcastle noted that it’s still doing due diligence on the assets, so the final agreement could be different.

Subprime loans are sold to poorer home buyers with lower credit scores. The sector is experiencing a credit crunch after interest rates climbed from record lows and house prices stopped rising quickly.

Several subprime mortgage specialists have filed for bankruptcy in recent months and other publicly traded companies in the business, such as New Century Financial and Accredited Home Lenders (LEND : Last: 8.95-1.95 -17.89% 6:45pm 03/19/2007) , have seen their shares slump as financial backers withdraw support.

However, Newcastle, which invests in real estate debt securities and other real estate related assets, is doing the opposite.

“Constrained liquidity and the re-pricing of credit risk in the subprime mortgage market have created a unique opportunity for us to purchase a portfolio of loans at an attractive price,” Kenneth Riis, Newcastle’s chief executive, said in a statement.

Newcastle didn’t say from which company it’s buying the loans and a spokeswoman for the REIT declined to comment.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/fortress-managed-reit-steps-subprime-mortgage/story.aspx?guid=%7BD88FBE61%2DEC50%2D43CA%2DA439%2D83BF9B858778%7D

 
Comment by tweedle-dee (not dumb)
2007-03-19 19:20:33

The risks of investing in subprime, similar story:
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/04/02/8403416/?postversion=2007031909

I like the stats in this story. In 1994 there was $35B of subprime lending. Some people are estimating that $25B of subprime is going to fail in CA alone ! It gives you some sense how far this bubble came and what drove it ! What a sad state of affairs we have today !

 
Comment by Wittbelle
Comment by CA renter
2007-03-20 01:10:14

LOL!! Take-over payments but she/he wants a $25K downpayment.

Is that $750K for a 3/2 in Corona??????????

There are some serious morons in this world.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post