March 21, 2007

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For March 21, 2007

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

263 Comments »

Comment by jmf
2007-03-21 04:50:47

bubble world tour / spain ready to bust ?

wow! when you read this it looks like you can eliminate the questionmark from the headline…….

i think this was posted yesterday but this is a must read. i have added some extra stuff. the us is definitely not alone…..

what inflation …?/ colbert :-)

http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/

Comment by luvs_footie
2007-03-21 05:29:35

jmf,

More Sangria………”Spanish Kool-aid”

 
Comment by John Fleming
2007-03-21 05:31:23

jmf,

The article talks about also Germans buying the last years. Are they mostly investors, secondary homeowners or people really retiring in Spain?

Comment by jmf
2007-03-21 05:49:09

germans that are buying in spain are usually secondary homeowners and retiring people.

this quote is really amazing

Property magnate Fernando Martin, the former Real Madrid soccer chairman, and Barcelona-based Promociones Habitat SA are paying five times more to borrow than U.S. developers such as Centex Corp.

Even UAL Corp.’s United Airlines, which was bankrupt last year, pays a lower risk premium on its loans.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 05:55:43

Think of the world as a giant cauldron, full of water…

The fires of easy money have stoked old school, tired industrial nations to the boiling point and beyond~

Most of my countrymen can only see that houses here have doubled and tripled, oblivious to the prices in Europe, which have quadrupled and quintupled.

TIMBER!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by nhz
2007-03-21 09:24:19

or even worse, quintupled (tuliped ??) sounds attractive compared to what is going on in my area. The lowest I can find is about x6, and some smaller historic villages in the area have already passed the x10 mark. It not only makes the homes totally unaffordable for the locals, it also ruins the place (if you are not very careful you will be driven over by a Lamborghini, or while swimming you could get hit by a mega jetski or 10M$ yacht).

 
 
Comment by Penina
2007-03-21 07:46:53

>germans that are buying in spain are usually secondary homeowners and retiring people.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Penina
2007-03-21 07:49:31

I was in Spain 2 years ago and visited German friends on Majorca and Dutch friends on the mainland . They live in Spain full-time. They showed and told me housing speculation by northern europeans is RAMPANT.

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-21 07:59:51

 
Comment by nhz
2007-03-21 09:16:06

the buyers from Northern Europe have:

- much higher incomes than the Spanish people
- in some cases huge HMD that they can use for homes they buy in Spain (like the Dutch); effectively a big part of these homes are paid for by the taxpayers
- lower (longterm) mortgage rates if they borrow in their own country (not always possible)
- huge equity gains from the preceding 15 year RE boom which they use to leverage their position

The numbers are huge. I think there are close to 1 million Irish with a home in Spain; about 3/4 of a million Dutch are living in Spain or owning a (second?) home there. There must be several million homeowners from UK, Germany etc. too. I’m sure most of them are speculators, even if they don’t see it like that themselves. I know many people in my country who have a second home in Spain (and often another one in Italy, France etc.); most of them visit that home maybe 2-4 weeks a year. The home is for ‘investment’ or simply to avoid taxes, or to do something with all the black money that was lying around after the euro conversion.

 
 
Comment by AKRon
2007-03-21 10:08:51

“Think of the world as a giant cauldron, full of water…

The fires of easy money have stoked old school, tired industrial nations to the boiling point and beyond~

Most of my countrymen can only see that houses here have doubled and tripled, oblivious to the prices in Europe, which have quadrupled and quintupled.”

Actually, there is also a housing bubble developing in, of all places, India:

http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/04/20/bloomberg/sxmuk.php

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by zeropointzero
2007-03-21 11:35:39

Germans “paying” to take over a country? Well, that is a new twist. I guess the days of the 1914-18 and 1939-45 no-money-down, no-payments-ever property land acquisition programs are a thing of the past.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 11:48:13

Germans are way sedate nowadays…

When we were in New Zealand last year, ran into a nice 22 year old German gal named Rita and we talked a bit and she related how her parents were born in 1965 and her grandparents were born in 1946.

Screw guilt, when there isn’t any links to the bogeymen, amongst the living. Good for them.

To enlighten you on how things can change…

We house 737 convicts, per 100k of our population, The Germans are sitting pretty @ 94 per 100k.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by nhz
2007-03-22 02:22:18

it is very clear that the Germans learned their lessons from WWII. Germany is one of the few EU countries where the government does not blindly follow the neocon war plans (the French don’t do that either, but they have their own ‘empire’ to take care of). Their armed forces are still geared for defense instead of attack (just look how Japan has changed lately …).

In the Netherlands people hated the Germans for a long time after the war, but they are now considered to be the most friendly and polite of all foreigners (especially the younger people from Germany).

 
 
 
 
Comment by Lou Minatti
2007-03-21 05:47:36

The dominos are falling.

 
Comment by jim A
2007-03-21 06:52:27

The latest installment in the xx-up documentary series had one of the subjects retiring to Spain, to a community full of other expats.

Comment by Lionel
2007-03-21 07:48:53

This was many years ago, early 90’s, when I visited the southern portion of Spain, and I was stunned to find so many British people both living and vacationing there to the point that restaurants were serving English food and playing English music. No offense to the British bloggers, but it was pretty disappointing to travel to Spain and not be able to find Spanish culture.

Comment by Brian in Chicago
2007-03-21 09:17:27

I was visiting my sister in England last year and was watching the news one day. They had a 10-15 minute program on all the British expats retiring in the south of Europe only to discover that the UK government is not willing to pay the full amount for their healthcare. People were outraged, claiming that they worked their entire life with the promise of healthcare being paid for when they retired. The people on the other side of the discussion said sure, you can get your healthcare - here in the UK.

All in all it was pretty interesting - the reporters had plenty of film of British expats and their communities in (mostly) Spain. There really are a LOT of them.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by nhz
2007-03-21 09:20:01

same with the Dutch, there are some areas on the Costas where you have to use Dutch instead of Spanish. They have zero contact with Spanish culture. Probably many of the people living there are those who left the Netherlands complaining about the bad integration of people who’s parents came from Turkey, Morocco etc.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by John Law
2007-03-21 09:44:48

“all the black money that was lying around after the euro conversion.”

could you explain?

 
Comment by CA renter
2007-03-21 14:40:27

It seems there has been a real shift in demographics since the late 80s/early 90s. Mexicans in the US (among others) and eastern Europeans moving across Europe (and the western Europeans moving east & south).

I wonder if the credit bubble made it easier for this to happen. With money flowing freely in the developed nations, others would be attracted to those regions, while the citizens of developing nations would have money to “invest” in other (cheap!) countries. Is it possible that this was intentional, to aid in globalization? Can’t be against “them” if they are indistinguishable from “us”.

 
Comment by Mike G
2007-03-21 22:07:42

“all the black money that was lying around after the euro conversion.”

could you explain?

In the changeover to the Euro, everyone had to take their marks, francs, guilders, etc. to the bank to convert them. If you had a lot of illicit cash from the underground economy that you couldn’t explain, you might face some awkward questions — better to spend it all before the changeover. There was a big boom in property sales, property renovations and other forms of consumption at that time.

 
Comment by nhz
2007-03-22 02:30:31

regarding euro conversion and black money:

Mike G explains it very well; one should add that Spain is about the only EU country where you can still buy homes with black money. It used to be easy in some other countries like Belgium (they even stimulated this for some time with a special tax law), but after the euro conversion the financial authorities made it a lot more difficult for the small fish. Of course, you can still whitewash money in Netherlands etc., but only if you are a big player like the drugs dealers or well-connected politicians; for the average citizen it is too risky to try.

But people still spend lots of black money here on renovations; you don’t get the HMD then, but who cares when an illegal Polish worker has a 5-10x lower hourly wage than a construction worker from the Netherlands … and because all gains from the sale of a home are tax free, this is an excellent way to whitewash for the small fish.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-21 04:58:47

This article is just a great way to start the day. Hey, Stucco, are you moonlighting? This looks like you might have written it.

http://tinyurl.com/ynqmaz

Comment by OCBear
2007-03-21 07:01:45

Stucco is a lot brighter than this guy.

From the article:
“So you have the Federal government’s legislative AND executive branches (if you know which branch the Federal Reserve comes under please email me) wanting to help these folks. But, still, liquidity wanes.

Everyone here knows the Federal Reserve is a private bank, wow. How much do you think this guy makes? I’m guessing he is a little overpaid.

Comment by grubner
2007-03-21 07:02:39

“your brother in law has finally clammed up”

How can Scott Reamer make such outrageous predictions, SHILL!

 
Comment by OCBear
2007-03-21 07:09:09

I went and read more of Reamer’s work, he is not a blunt tool by any means. Still can’t believe the comment. /shrug

Even lucid minds appear to forget the system structure.

The Fed R. has a contract. They control things until the contract is pulled. Maybe that is what he means, who has the ability to pull the contract? Heck I’m reaching.

Comment by combotechie
2007-03-21 08:12:49

The Federal Reserve is a creation of Congress and exists at Congress’s pleasure.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by OCBear
2007-03-21 09:07:00

The “Federal Reserve Act” is a creation of congress and 12 Private Banks were created to administer the legislation. The Bank’s being Private means that technically their infastructure is beholden to no Congressional entity it is the “Act” that enables them to control the currency. The FOMC Board is politically appointed from a list supplied by these 12 Fed.R. Banks to the Executive Branch and confirmed by Congress. It appears to work now as a political tool for economic policy more towards the intent of the original legislation then it did in say the 20’s and 30’s when it was blatantly more corrupt.

Bottom line is that the “ACT” is legislation, the “Banks” are private entities.

Short Wikipidia definition, not the best, but adequate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Act

 
Comment by Jerry
2007-03-21 22:45:19

The federal reserve is “private’ and only answers to themselves. When was the last time any member of congress brought up a new director from the “outside”? You can’t. Some day the full picture will be told. The general public still believes in the “mith” of the almighty federal reserve and has been to lazy to even investgate its beginning. So sad. It is the same with the lenders who had “the best interest” of their borrows with all of the toxie, adjustables with prepayment loans at heart. The sheep were set up and now may be the “truth” will be reveiled, unfortunately after the damage/sorrow has been done for the sake of greed.

 
 
 
Comment by Mary Lee
2007-03-21 12:41:30

That was a joke……..reference to the Fed definitely not being part of the guvmint

 
Comment by CA renter
2007-03-21 14:44:39

OC Bear,
I think he was being facetious (sp?). He was making a funny. :)

 
 
 
Comment by Richie
2007-03-21 04:59:33

I’m first! Woohoo! I beat out immobilielblasen!

Comment by luvs_footie
2007-03-21 05:01:26

Oh no you didn’t………..hahaha

Comment by Richie
2007-03-21 05:05:25

Bah! caching has foiled me again!

 
 
2007-03-21 06:05:51

methinks immobilielblasen has a computer program that monitors the site and automatically posts in the morning.

Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-21 07:28:33

Herr Fedderson wachet sehr frueher dann Amerikaner auf.

 
 
Comment by PDXrenter
2007-03-21 06:37:04

Guys, this “first post” is juvenile. Please stop it.

Comment by RJ
2007-03-21 06:51:34

And quit jumping on the bed.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2007-03-21 07:07:52

NAH 1st post is not juvenile…you have get some praise and respect in this lifetime

By the way when was the last time your boss told you how great you are?

 
Comment by Fairfax_VA_Renter
2007-03-21 07:20:52

Relax dude, it’s the “Bits Bucket”.

I’d rather see short light-hearted posts than long rambling rants any day.

Comment by FutureVulture
2007-03-21 08:41:31

Yep.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-21 05:03:07

This may get double-posted. This is a great article. I think our side has finally turned the tide of this battle. Let’s not lose the war.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/commentary-goes-boom-must-go/story.aspx?guid=%7B392611D8%2D79F5%2D4101%2DA9B4%2D200DC62D1868%7D&siteid=yhoo&dist=yhoo

Comment by txchick57
2007-03-21 05:10:03

Posted that on here two days ago when it was on Minyanville. When Reamer makes Marketwatch, that’s probably a short term buy signal.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-21 05:28:23

And Morgan Stanley has record earnings. Next year will be another record, aided by a Senator Dodd sponsored bailout.

 
 
Comment by luvs_footie
2007-03-21 05:14:00

NYCityBoy,

This Dodd and Clinton bail out proposal could very well turn around and bite them in the *ss. I don’t think they have truly thought it through.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-21 05:26:15

I feel the same way. 1) It will reduce credit even further. Who wants to loan out anything if the borrower might get grace periods where there is no need to repay? 2) You will keep people in houses where they don’t belong. It doesn’t take much to trash a neighborhood. This is seldom thought about. 3) It will kill the psychology of the average owner. They will think, “this must be awful if even the government fools are getting involved”.

We went from “real estate always goes up” to “we need a government bailout” in less than 2 years. Is that some kind of record?

Comment by txchick57
2007-03-21 05:27:45

Don’t worry about it. Those two are just blowhards with no power at all. Trying to get elected. Won’t work.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-21 05:57:49

I just look at my tax bill and I think, “how much more can they squeeze out of me?” I’m afraid I just might find out the answer to that one. A chill just rushed down my spine.

 
Comment by scdave
2007-03-21 06:19:00

NYboy;….I just saw a stream come across bloomberg that NYC is preparing for cut backs…Economy slowing down there ?

 
Comment by LowTenant
2007-03-21 06:21:58

NYCityBoy, the rest of us in NYC can sympathize. I have friends here who came from more socialized countries like Canada and Germany, and they say their taxes here in NY are higher than back home.

I personally pay 50% off-the-top to a combination of federal, state, and city income taxes and health insurance. And I’m not rich enough to shrug that off.

I’m not against taxation per se, but it seems like they’re coming up with dumber and dumber ways to spend my money.

 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-21 06:26:18

I haven’t seen a slowdown. Everybody on the subway seems able to afford cell phones and iPods and every other gadget known to man.

There is still the “real estate won’t go down here” mentality. That hasn’t died.

New York does have a big wild card that will impact the economy over the next few years. That gaping hole down the street from me will have a huge economic impact. The construction will spur economic development. If they rebuild (yes I said “if”. They are moving so slowly) the World Trade site it should add thousands of jobs back to the economy. That is one thing that could help the City avoid the years of stagnation coming to some other areas of the country (hello, California).

 
Comment by MGNYC
2007-03-21 06:47:35

NYC boy check out the insert in today’s ny post
it is a 46 page glossy with all the lovely $1300 or more a sq foot apartments you could ever want
my dog will put it to good use later today

 
Comment by RMB
2007-03-21 07:15:11

NYCityBoy,

The US federal govt spends more each year than the entire GDP of Germany. Germany has ~80 million people. Think about that for a second. When you add in state and local spending govt spending just about doubles to 2X the GDP of Germany. Anyone who thinks the US has low taxes or that the govt is in anyway in need of more money has not looked at the data on the issue.

 
Comment by peter m
2007-03-21 08:12:10

“That is one thing that could help the City avoid the years of stagnation coming to some other areas of the country (hello, California)”

Just need to comment on the role of construction projects on the economy out here in CA. What I see traveling around greater LA Metro region/OC/IE are ongoing freeway projects such as the indio/60 fwy widening project out in Moreno valley. They are of course publicly-funded thru bonds and only benefit a tiny proportion of the CA workforce.
There are still residential/mixed used/retail projects under way all over LA area but i have noticed a slowdown in the RATE and SPEED of construction and even possible scalebacks in scope of project. One massive multi-unit in irvine off 405 as been in construction since beg of 2006 and it is still only 60% complete. Verodwtn LA 100unit(a small project) took over a year and even now is barely ready. Another massive multi-unit project off 210/foothill in pasadena has been over a year in constrcution and still only 50% complete.
I do notice all those recently completed large retail malls in the IE which are almost empty of shoppers. Quite a few commercial parks have vacancies and for-lease signs all over, even the brand new ones.
Construction projects do provide work for a host of ancillary contractors/subcontractors at decent wages. When contruction projects halt or slow down this affects a relatively high-paying jobs sector for SCal, which has very few hi-paying sectors as it is. Look for a bloodbath out in the IE, which more than any other region in SCal depends upon RE-related contruction/infrasructure development to keep it’s economy going.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-03-21 06:15:16

The hand-wringing political party always thinks they can cure the disease with the band-aid approach. They just mask the symptoms for awhile and then the disease wins in the end. This is the distortion of the mixed economy and the joke is on the gullible public. The funniest part is that the socialist engineers are really trying to fix the problems they cause, not problems from voluntary exchange.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2007-03-21 06:57:43

Same here in Queens …Long Island city who is buying these 1/2 millon Lofts on a major intersection, with not even a supermarket close by.

Has anyone thought that maybe Greenspan was trying to keep people in DEBT, to eliminate any massive street protests about Bush or Iraq?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by lainvestorgirl
2007-03-21 07:36:50

This has definitely crossed my mind more than a few times…when you are in debt you have neither the time nor the wherewithall to protest or even notice a whole range of gov’t stuff going on now designed to screw the average citizen. Not to sound paranoid, but there are cameras going up in many major US cities designed to monitor ordinary citizens (namely, Chicago), our presidente seems to have some agenda going on with Vicente Fox and refuses to enforce the border, our border control agents are being sent to jail for doing their jobs, we are still in Iraq even though our mission has already been accomplished (topple Hussein, get rid of weapons of mass destruction), the middle class is getting hammered from all directions, but hey, we’re all focused on making that minimum credit card payment (or mortgage payment) each month.

 
Comment by lainvestorgirl
2007-03-21 07:39:13

Paranoia off.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2007-03-21 08:01:49

HEY NYCboy:

Maybe Bloomberg et all IS waiting for the economy to slow down, then they can pay lower wages to the workers contractors suppliers, and make them all work 24/7 with no shift/weekend differentials. If unemployment goes up even 2% people will bend the union rules.

work is work.

——–The construction will spur economic development. If they rebuild (yes I said “if”. They are moving so slowly)

 
Comment by Auger-Inn
2007-03-21 09:32:10

Here is the “tin foil hat” explanation for what is going on.

http://www.independencejournal.com/

 
Comment by Seattle Renter
2007-03-21 11:11:53

lainvestorgirl -

It may be paranoia in the absolute, but I can easily believe that the factors you describe are a fringe benefit that could/would cause many in power to refrain from taking corrective action.

 
Comment by Auger-Inn
2007-03-21 11:26:37

Oh, almost forgot, here is the agenda with Mexico for those who haven’t yet seen it
http://www.augustreview.com/news_commentary/north_american_union/north_american_union_conspiracy_exposed_2007022150/

 
Comment by OB_Tom
2007-03-21 11:43:44
 
 
 
Comment by Big V
2007-03-21 12:31:12

Hey Luvs:

I freaked out when I first heard about Hillary’s comment, but then I just got real snide because I know that every lending institution in the world will immediately stop offering mortgage loans to Americans if they know that their collateral will not be collectable upon default. Furthermore, they will quickly proceed with every foreclosure in process, and will refuse to allow that process to drag out any longer than is currently required by law (I think 90 days?).

That would reduce house prices to whatever amount the players have in cash (maybe 20% of current prices). That would be awesome! I hope it happens.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-21 05:14:55

“Let’s not lose the war.”

Testify, Brothah! And the war is on, with cries from various quarters being heard about “Washington Based” solutions. I read a great article on Alan Greenspan’s role in this whole debacle. The author really savaged him. (wish I could link it, but I’m not up for comments about tin foil hats). The guy was vicious and unsparing in his analysis of Greenspan’s easy money policies. It would be nice to see Easy Al go into the night a reviled and discredited man.

Comment by luvs_footie
2007-03-21 05:41:52

You don’t think he is already?

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-21 05:48:02

Not yet. He’s still getting lauded at $100,000.00 speaking engagements. I want to see him hauled before Congress and grilled like a hot dog.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ex-nnvmtgbrkr
2007-03-21 06:56:03

How ’bout grilling his hot dog?

Got mustard?

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-21 06:58:21

“How ’bout grilling his hot dog?

Got mustard?”

Oh, man, ROTFLMAO! The tears, the tears… It’s just too much fun here this AM, but I must actually go off to do some work. DANG!

 
Comment by oxide
2007-03-21 07:38:50

Oh, man, PUKE! The mental image, the mental image…it’s just too nauseating here this AM.

Greenspan ain’t exactly George Clooney, ya know. (and actually, that would make it even worse.)

 
Comment by AKRon
2007-03-21 11:39:55

It might be more of a beenie weenie than a hot dog. I wouldn’t want to know, actually.

 
Comment by sf jack
2007-03-21 11:50:22

Kass on Culprit # 1 (article first posted by txchic many days ago):

“Kass: Four to Blame for the Subprime Mess”

“Culprit #1: Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan was no smarter than a fifth grader.

Greenspan did two big things wrong.

First, the former Fed chairman took interest rates far too low and maintained those levels for far too long a period in the early 2000s, well after the stock market’s bubble was pierced. (Stated simply, he panicked).

The Fed’s very loose monetary policy served to encourage the new, marginal and non-traditional home buyer — the speculator and the investor, not the dweller — to embark on a speculative orgy in home purchases not seen in nearly a century.

Over time, home prices, especially on the coasts, were elevated to levels that stretched affordability well beyond the means of most buyers. Ultimately, despite relatively strong employment and low interest rates, the residential housing market crashed hard.

Second, Greenpsan suggested — at just the wrong time and at the very bottom of the interest rate cycle — that homeowners retreat from traditional, fixed rate mortgages and turn to more creative and floating rate mortgages — interest only, adjustable option ARMs, negative amortization, etc.

He said this in February 2004 at a Credit Union National Association 2004 Governmental Affairs Conference…”

http://www.thestreet.com/pf/markets/activetraderupdate/10344345.html

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 05:07:55

I can’t get no satisfaction

I can’t get no sub-prime action

‘Cause I lied and I lied and I lied, oh how I lied

I can’t get no, I can’t get no

When I’m driving so god dam far, for I bought in b.f.e.

because the man on the the radio

was sellin’ me on more useless re-fi notions

Allowing me to heloc more and more

and why would houses go up with 2% inflation?

I can’t get no, oh no no no

Hey, hey, hey, like I ever was gonna really pay?

Saw Mick and the boys from the Ueker seats down San Diego way awhile back. Mick’s got the moves of a 23 year old somehow, still.

Comment by dude
2007-03-21 06:11:42

If one can strike just the right balance between cocaine and whiskey it will have that effect.
Sounds like a lot of FBs, no?

Comment by jim A
2007-03-21 06:59:53

Of course it was Alan’s attempt to find the right balance between acommodating and tightening that got us into this mess. That sort of balance can’t be maintained forever.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-03-21 06:17:49

I got the 4 Flicks DVD. The foursome keep their “girlish” figures by smoking a lot and eating very little. Actually Mick takes dance lessons (in a short scene on 4 Flicks) and probably also does yoga, which, besides being skinny as a rail, helps to make him move as fast as a 23 year old.

 
Comment by Daniel
2007-03-21 07:06:29

Alan Greenskam and Mick Jagger both knighted by the Queen. I wonder if that has any significant meaning?

Got Amero’s?

 
Comment by the_economist
2007-03-21 07:08:09

Are you kidding?…I saw him at the half time of the football game. He looked like my grandmother dancing drunk at my sisters
wedding!…I was embarrased for all of his families.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 07:19:04

Well, we were in the Ueker seats, @ Petko…

It might have been his stunt double?

Comment by the_economist
2007-03-21 07:52:52

It might have been one of his grandkids??

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 07:56:47

Going to a good old rock and roll concert is an interesting trip, just looking at who the audience is… a buncha older boomers mainly~

When I was oh so very young and big band and swing music was dying out amongst the folks that were of the right age, it must have felt similar?

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 08:06:01

Say,

Using a name like the_economist, would be perfect cover, if you were in fact an economist of some note. Is that you Alan?

Confirm or deny?

 
 
 
 
Comment by dimedroppped
2007-03-21 08:24:05

Good drugs.

 
 
Comment by Mike_in_Fl
2007-03-21 05:16:29

Data on home sales, pricing, and inventory have been updated for February for northern Palm Beach County. The figures come from a local broker, and they usually come out a few days before the official data from the Florida Association of Realtors.

The short version: Sales dropped about 44% YOY, while supply climbed 34%. In fact, it appears that there are now more homes for sale in this area than at any time in the current cycle.

More stats and analysis here:
http://interestrateroundup.blogspot.com/2007/03/heres-skinny-on-february-home-sales-and.html

Comment by Ft Lauderdale
2007-03-21 05:52:26

thanks mike, the supply is up in the areas I watch down here also.

 
 
Comment by Tom
2007-03-21 05:18:59

Well this is funny. Million Dollar homes renting for $150 a month. LOL! Talk about a cash flow problem. Listen to how the so called investor tries to spin this. “I’m trying to help low income families”

The neighbors are complaining that the area will lose value.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/20/billionaire.charity.ap/index.html

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-21 05:35:57

I love it, Tom. Now I just wish someone up in Hedge Fund Heaven (Greenwich,Connecticut) would do the same thing so that the fundies can get to know a wider swath of society. And also so they can learn what middle income earners have to cope with in everyday life. I took a tour of my old neighborhood the other day, the one where I had a house not quite two years ago. My street was OK. Two streets over it might as well be the barrio, with half dressed little kids wandering up and down unsupervised. Almost completely trashed. This has happened in less than two years.

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-21 05:38:06

Sometimes characters like him will do stuff like this to jerk their neighbors’ chains, and also just because he can.

2007-03-21 06:16:13

I agree.

 
 
Comment by JA
2007-03-21 06:03:33

$150 a month??

Now how the hell can the folks at the Super 8 motel compete with that?

Comment by eastcoaster
2007-03-21 06:17:09

Do they even have Super 8s in Hawaii?

As for riff raff moving into these homes and bringing the neighborhood down, I don’t know if Hawaii has the kind of “trash” that the mainland does.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-21 06:20:05

Watch Dog the Bounty Hunter and then make that statement.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2007-03-21 09:38:12

Oh yeah, Hawaii’s got a lot of trash.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 11:52:10

Takling about hunters…

I wish the good doctor, Hunter S. Thompson, hadn’t blown himself up real good, awhile back. What fun he’d have had with this ongoing debacle?

Sincerely, the wantabe never was bastard child, of his.

 
 
Comment by Big V
2007-03-21 12:46:54

I think Hawaii is supposed to have a huge meth problem. I’ve heard that law enforcement there is a joke.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Amoney
2007-03-21 17:28:55

This is true. Probably at least 20% of the drivers are
uninsured. Even the cops and firemen don’t register their cars. Cops don’t do much here except clean up the mess
after the s-t hits the fan.

 
 
 
 
Comment by droog
2007-03-21 06:13:09

Mike:

My GF and I have found a nice little rental in your neighborhood. When we did a walkthrough yesterday, my GF said, “I wonder what our neighbors will be like.”

We looked around us - the two houses next store were vacant and for sale; the two houses across the street were also vacant and for sale.

I said, “Honey, I don’t think we have any neighbors.”

Where on earth do you go trick-or-treating?

2007-03-21 06:17:28

GF means ‘Greater Fool’ on this blog. Or, perhaps, now that are no more fools, does GF revert back to being GirlFriend?

Comment by dude
2007-03-21 06:20:18

Believe me, there are still fools out there, but more and more they are LFs (lucky fools) who don’t get approved for subprime financing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by droog
2007-03-21 06:35:45

When used in the possessive, as in “my GF” then the correct interpretation is “girlfriend”. When used in this fashion, “That GF just bought my overpriced POS so now I can rent at half the cost,” then GF means “greater fool”. It’s all about the context :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by BM
2007-03-21 07:45:38

Personally I’m less worried about his use of GF and more worried about the use of “next store,” as if he’s never had to spell out “next door” in his entire life. This can’t possibly be a typo!

Comment by droog
2007-03-21 07:57:01

Ha ha! Good catch. Now I have to go sit on a two-by-four laden with nails because until today I thought I was a grammar nazi. “Next store” is hilarious!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by BM
2007-03-21 08:22:46

LOL, thanks, and enjoy your 2×4!

It’s not grammar, but what I like to think of as homophone errors. People who don’t write often are more prone to these errors.

“Next door” could, with poor diction, sound like “next store.”

“For all intents and purposes” sounds like “for all intensive purposes.”

I could go on and on.

 
Comment by droog
2007-03-21 08:29:18

How about this interesting foible? I oftentimes write “moi” instead of my name on task lists. I can’t tell you how many times people have asked me, “Who is this MO-AYE person?

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 08:52:40

I throw down the gauntlet, in the guise of an misguided vowel…

 
 
Comment by AKRon
2007-03-21 11:43:40

He probably does mean ‘next store’. As in, someone will be selling crack/ice out of it in a few months…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Mike_in_Fl
2007-03-21 08:08:22

Yeah, those vacant homes are everywhere. One across the street has been for sale since last December … one next door to that one went up for sale (nice family that wants to move out of state to where more relatives live) about 2-3 months ago. The one two houses down from the original one mentioned has been on the market for a few months, and the one on my side of the street next door to us went up for sale about 2 months ago.

I’m just glad my family isn’t planning on going anywhere for a long time. Also, we bought in 2003 before the biggest part of the run up in prices got underway … we put about 20% down … and we financed with a 30-yr. fixed rate mortgage. In an absolute Armageddon scenario, we could still get hurt, but even I’m not that bearish.

Comment by droog
2007-03-21 09:31:52

It’s a shame that beautiful neighborhoods may be decimated by the implosion of this bubble. As one of Ben’s headlines read a few days ago, the bubble has ruined [California, Florida, Arizona, Oregon, insert state here].

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Chip
2007-03-21 17:49:52

Unfortunately, if the IRS finds out about this, it will “impute” a market rent that is vastly greater than $150/month and treat the difference as a gift and taxable income to the poor renters.

Comment by Chip
2007-03-21 17:56:33

“No good deed goes unpunished.”

 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-21 05:21:31

In other news, it looks like our esteemed (cough) attorney general will have his illustrious career cut short by a major boner he pulled in plotting to fire those eight US attorneys for political reasons and then lying about it.

If you’re happy and you know it, clap your hands….

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 05:38:35

the house of cards that is the bush administration, is disintigrating before our very eyes and doesn’t our ersatz leader look oh so old and tired?

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-21 05:53:56

aladinsane, being a philosopher, you can probably appreciate the parallels between the bubble and the administration. From a purely philosophical standpoint, not even political. Two power structures built on lies and houses of cards, now starting to creak and sway a bit at the same time. The two are intertwined.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 06:15:41

I’m a big picture kinda guy…

And my eyes are oh so very wide open~

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by jim A
2007-03-21 07:04:31

Well he frittered away his politcal capital, HELOCed the War on Terror and now has difficulty that the option ARM on his big McWar in BF IRAQ is readjusting.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by FutureVulture
2007-03-21 08:56:22

“Now we all need to pitch in and bail me out.”

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 09:04:27

The way I see it, you good old boys earned $200.00 playing tonight, but you drank $300.00 worth of beer, so you owe us $100.00.

“Ok, we both have to go back to our car and sign the traveler’s checks and then we’ll be right back”

My shaky memory of a scene from “The Blues Brothers” r.i.p. Belushi, you madman…

 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfruede
2007-03-21 16:34:10

Bush couldn’t lead ants to a picnic. His neo-con cabal is finally, not a minute too soon, beginning to be held accountable for their mind-freezing incompetence and over-reaching. Wonder which ship will be next to sail from the sinking rat?

 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2007-03-21 05:41:19

clinton fired all of them
did you clap for that ?
the media certainly didn’t care then

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-21 05:56:45

flatff, it’s not the the attorneys were fired that is the problem, it is the lying under oath that has old ‘Berto in trouble. Same thing that got Clinton in the end, and others: not the action, but the cover-up. Martha Stewart knows.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-21 06:18:01

That’s what got Scooter Libby. What is so hard about knowing that you tell the truth when you are testifying? Cover-ups are a killer. Just admit you did the thing, apologize and don’t do it again. Arrogance leads to cover-ups.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-21 06:23:31

Yep, NY, you nailed it. Clinton, Libby, Gonzo, all lawyers, all liars. Arrogance is the key to the fall.

 
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2007-03-21 06:56:51

Public figures lying? C’mon, say it ain’t so! Nah! ;-)
If everyone who lied to the public or law enforcement were in jail…

And I can tell you from working at a law office with official depositions taken, people lie through their teeth all the time, over and over, balf-faced refutable lies. Just don’t be in the position of being made a public scapegoat for it, which is what the cases are here, with prosecutors either out to make a name for themselves or just so angry the rest of their case isn’t hanging as it should that they have to hang somebody.

And so just like in that case, the mortgage market shakeout will be similar, with almost all the milions of liars escaping criminal penalties, but an unlucky few being selected for severe treatment as examples for the rest of us.

 
Comment by cassiopeia
2007-03-21 12:41:03

Clinton, Libby, Gonzo, all lawyers, all liars. Arrogance is the key to the fall.

Palmetto, I agree. If Clinton had just said, “look, it’s none of your business, that’s between me and my family”, we could have saved millions of dollars.

 
Comment by Chip
2007-03-21 18:37:52

NoVa: “And so just like in that case, the mortgage market shakeout will be similar, with almost all the milions of liars escaping criminal penalties, but an unlucky few being selected for severe treatment as examples for the rest of us.”

Sounds right to me, unfortunately.

 
 
Comment by dark1p
2007-03-21 07:20:00

Well, actually, it’s not just the lying to Congress, either. Some of the emails and the actions of Domenici suggest that some prosecutors were replaced for investigating Republicans, in a couple of cases in mid-investigation, which is a serious issue. Given the track record of this Administration, smoke usually means there’s a blazing inferno somewhere.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by kckid
2007-03-21 08:01:12

Congress always lie to us. Social Security, Medicare etc.
These are nice distractions to keep the American eye off the ball as we continue down the road of globalization.

 
Comment by Stars End
2007-03-21 19:34:09

Ahem,..can anyone say Randy “Duke” Cunningham? ;)

 
 
Comment by evil doc
2007-03-21 07:29:21

was the AG under oath?????

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2007-03-21 08:35:45

AG under oath? I don’t think so, not there.

 
 
 
Comment by KennyBabes
2007-03-21 09:02:35

put down the fox news talking points.

each administration when entering office fires all the US attorneys, some get re-appointed some don’t.

Firing 8 very specific USA 6 years into an ongoing administration because they

1. are investigation Republican corruption.
2. wont indict Democrats without evidence.

Then covering it up and lying about are the problems

Smarter monkeys please.

Comment by KennyBabes
2007-03-21 09:15:28

little snippet for ya

“Firing the Attorneys. United States attorneys can be fired whenever a president wants, but not, as § 1512 (c) puts it, to corruptly obstruct, influence, or impede an official proceeding.

Let’s take the case of Carol Lam, United States attorney in San Diego. The day the news broke that Ms. Lam, who had already put one Republican congressman in jail, was investigating a second one, Mr. Sampson wrote an e-mail message referring to the “real problem we have right now with Carol Lam.” He said it made him think that it was time to start looking for a replacement. Congress has also started investigating the removal of Fred Black, the United States attorney in Guam, who was replaced when he began investigating the Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Anyone involved in firing a United States attorney to obstruct or influence an official proceeding could have broken the law.”

Much more needs to be learned, and Senator Patrick Leahy, the Vermont Democrat who leads the Judiciary Committee, has been admirably firm about insisting that he will get sworn testimony from Karl Rove and other key players. It is far too soon to say that anyone committed a crime, and it may well be that no one has. But if this were a law school issue spotter, any student who could not identify any laws that may have been broken would get an “F.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by KennyBabes
2007-03-21 09:16:17
 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 09:35:59

Riddle me this Batman…

An ineptministration, riddled with corruption, so much so, that to reveal the extent of said cancerous growths, would kill the patient, so, the patient is being kept on life support~

For now.

 
 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-21 05:45:52

It’s not so much the political aspects of the situation that warm my heart, but the fact that Gonzales is a graduate of Harvard Law School. Harvard Law. What a joke. They managed to turn out a complete idiot who wouldn’t know the Constitution if it came up and hit him in the hindquarters. Haaahvaahd Law. They trained their graduate to act like a consigliere for the Corleones. You’ll find better lawyers from a diploma mill than you will Haahvaahd Law.

Comment by scdave
2007-03-21 06:25:30

Isn’t Cramer also H Law ??

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-21 06:34:48

Oh, geez, CRAMER is Harvard Law? There’s another one pulling a boner, glorifying illegal market manipulation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by davidcee
2007-03-21 08:52:52

Bill Orally of Fox Noise keeps using his Harvard Business School connection. Is Harvard proud that they have produced such a esteemed newsman?

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-21 06:41:20

Oh, man, scdave, I was just thinking about your comment on Cramer and the future hit me like a flash. You heard it here first, folks, so listen up, here’s Cramer’s next act:

He’s gonna get nailed for what he said about illegal manipulation. He was baiting someone to come after him, because he knows how rampant it is and if he goes down, others are coming with him. Still, they can’t let him get away with that, so he’ll be in some legal hot water. And then LORDY, LORDY, he’ll get religion and sing like a canary on many of the people and entities involved. He will reveal what he knows, who did what and how they did it, because NOW he’s on the side of the angels, avenging the little guy for the excesses of Wall Street.

Mark my words. You heard it here first.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-03-21 08:24:37

I have a bit different take on the video…Cramer is an actor and in the video he is…acting. Nobody arrested Michael Douglas for the inside trading his character performed in “Wall Street”. Cramer will just say he was bs’ing and he probably was in order to pump up his shows ratings by providing his folllowers with the “real inside info” that only a straight shooter like Cramer can provide.

 
 
Comment by Patriotic Bear
2007-03-21 11:31:36

More like Sing Sing City College.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by LowTenant
2007-03-21 06:35:28

Those of us that went there aren’t surprised one bit. Gonzo is relatively straight compared to some of his fellow alums.

Every HLS class has a well-known handful of “most likely to be indicted someday” classmates. I’m positive I’m going to see some of mine in the papers any day now.

That’s not to say there aren’t a lot of spectacularly admirable people from there also.

Comment by PDXrenter
2007-03-21 06:50:31

The biggest load of herd mentality I have ever seen was in HLS and HBS students. Each class has some very admirable people, but a large majority are just desperate bunch of a$$ kissing lemmings. They graduate and go on to be miserable, well-paid whiners.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-21 06:55:42

Yale isn’t too shabby, either.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-21 06:52:48

“That’s not to say there aren’t a lot of spectacularly admirable people from there also.”

yes, well, maybe some of the spectacularly admirable (the very BEST) people need to get active in disbarment activity. Like lobbying the Texas Bar association to jettison Gonzo. But do I think it’s going to happen? NAH! Because the law is a racket, a brotherhood. Really, back in the days of the Roman Empire (upon which our system is based, loosely at least), all it took to be a lawyer was a good gift for gab. Lawyers were essentially orators and actors who presented their case for a “thumbs up, thumbs down”. They were proxy gladiators for their clients.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2007-03-21 10:00:59

Like lobbying the Texas Bar association to jettison Gonzo. But do I think it’s going to happen? NAH! Because the law is a racket, a brotherhood.
Nixon got disbarred. Clinton got disbarred. Happens all the time. What makes you so sure Gonzo won’t get his just dessert?

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2007-03-21 07:20:00

Say Hi to Professor Arthur Miller……..i used to see him daily at court tv during the OJ trial, and worked on his tv show millers law….

Its a damn shame Miller Cochran and Grace all said i’d make a gret paralegal…and lawyers would hire me in a minute….and now i have to beg for work. Laywers just dont want anyone who have been around those kinds of lawyers…

I should have hung around scummy ambulance chasers, it would have made me more employable.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2007-03-21 09:35:28

Ever hear of affirmative action? Go to any big law firm and check out the Ivy league grads. You’ll find a couple in every class.

Comment by aNYCdj
2007-03-21 14:27:52

txchick

if you are a gay man you get first crack at jobs in a law firms, over a straight man, like me.

Its called “attention to details” and gays are great at sweating every little detail.

Nahhhhhh dont ask if i can fake it……….LOL

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by AKRon
2007-03-21 11:51:37

Yes, Gonzales’ learned (ahem) opinion will live in infamy among the stupidest statements ever made:

“There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there’s a prohibition against taking it away,” Gonzales said.

Ouch.

OT, sales in Home Depot stores open for more than a year have fallen 6.6% yoy. More fallout.

Comment by AKRon
2007-03-21 12:05:27

Lowes is losing sales, too:

“If sales really have bottomed, then why is the company forecasting a 2%-to-4% decline in same-store sales for the current quarter? That doesn’t seem like a bottom to me, especially not for a company that has historically delivered positive same-store sales growth.”

Its stock has fallen 34% since last summer’s low price.

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/StreetPatrol/DontBuyRosyForecastFromLowes.aspx

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Kathy
2007-03-21 18:43:58

I could tell you stories about Harvard law graduates that would make your head spin. Incompetence like you wouldn’t believe.

 
Comment by Kathy
2007-03-21 18:43:59

I could tell you stories about Harvard law graduates that would make your head spin. Incompetence like you wouldn’t believe.

 
 
Comment by jag
2007-03-21 07:15:55

Fire 8 US attorneys and its a “major boner”.

Fire ALL US attorneys (when YOU are being investigated by one along with your party’s MAJORITY LEADER)…….ho hum.

For the uninformed, US attorney positions are plum political appointments. They can be fired without cause (as Clinton did the first day he took office). Yes, ongoing trials and investigations can be affected when a US attorney is abruptly fired. So, since this reality certainly applied to ALL the US attorneys fired by Clinton, the question is what is special about the firing of 8 US attorneys by Bush?

Its politics and not particularly brilliant politics at that. If all you can conjure up is 8 disaffected political appointees to wag in your political opposition’s face you either don’t have much material to work with or you are pretty lame, no?

Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-21 07:36:52

“US attorney positions are plum political appointments.”

They serve at the pleasure of the president.

– John Stewart –

Comment by manraygun
2007-03-21 09:33:02

GS, thanks, the stewart segment you reference is hilarious. link:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/03/15/daily-show-serving-at-the-pleasure-of-the-president/

For those interested in being “informed” by someone other than jag, paul krugman’s nytimes columns of 3/12 and 3/9 explain why this is an important issue.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jag
2007-03-21 11:05:57

Paul Krugman….surely an unbiased source.

I suppose if you can’t dispute the facts you’ll search for an “expert” who can contort something more to your liking.

All I’m pointing out is the ridiculous double standard. With all due respect to Krugman, somehow I doubt you’ll find a record of him calling Clinton’s blanket firing problematic in any way.

Let’s assume the worst; all eight were on the verge of some explosive indictments. Exactly what will keep them from spilling their guts to a receptive media?

If you wanted to “hide” something you wouldn’t fire them, you’d find a way to “promote” them. After all, they’re political animals these appointees and its pretty easy to buy off most anyone much less a politician.

This is just fun and games for Leahy. He knows he can’t win a constitutional battle over this issue but he doesn’t care. Its just great fodder with which to score points.

 
Comment by KennyBabes
2007-03-21 12:45:28

18 U.S.C. § 1512 (b) makes it illegal to intimidate Congressional witnesses. Michael Elston, Mr. McNulty’s chief of staff, contacted one of the fired attorneys, H. E. Cummins, and suggested, according to Mr. Cummins, that if he kept speaking out, there would be retaliation. Mr. Cummins took the call as a threat, and sent an e-mail message to other fired prosecutors warning them of it. Several of them told Congress that if Mr. Elston had placed a similar call to one of their witnesses in a criminal case, they would have opened an investigation of it.makes it illegal to intimidate Congressional witnesses. Michael Elston, Mr. McNulty’s chief of staff, contacted one of the fired attorneys, H. E. Cummins, and suggested, according to Mr. Cummins, that if he kept speaking out, there would be retaliation. Mr. Cummins took the call as a threat, and sent an e-mail message to other fired prosecutors warning them of it. Several of them told Congress that if Mr. Elston had placed a similar call to one of their witnesses in a criminal case, they would have opened an investigation of it.”

smarter monkeys please

Parroting faux news talking points makes you look ignorant (not aware of the facts) the first time….and a malicious liar the second time.

 
Comment by manraygun
2007-03-21 14:15:59

“I suppose if you can’t dispute the facts you’ll search for an “expert” who can contort something more to your liking.”

Facts? You use the same definition as fox news. Your condescending post is series of bland assertions based on republican talking points which themselves are based on an idiotically broad interpretation of the “They serve at the pleasure of the president.” (the point of stewart’s brilliant and funny clip ). Krugman is upfront about being a liberal columnist, readers can take from it what they like from his columns–there are plenty of facts to choose from.

As to your “clinton did it worse, there’s a double standard” claim, you neglect to mention or are ignorant of the fact that a new president cleaning house at the start of his term is par for the course. In 1993, Clinton replaced H.W. Bush’s prosecutors. In 2001, Bush replaced Clinton’s prosecutors. None of this is remotely unusual.

The current scandal is about taking out AG’s who aren’t good “Bushies” (nice term), ie those that investigate republican corruption. Since the plan seems to have emanted in the white house brace yourself for more claims of “executive privilege” in the next few weeks.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Mugsy
2007-03-21 05:41:46

$800K for 1,000 sq. ft.? Sign me up for Vegas baby! What? They went BK? How could that possibly happen?

http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2007/Mar-21-Wed-2007/business/13296468.html

Comment by luvs_footie
2007-03-21 05:44:14

Send it to Dodd and Clinton and ask for a bail out.

Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-03-21 06:22:18

Okay, a bashing by Aladinsane of the Shrub admin, and now a bashing of Odd-Dodd and Hillarious by luvs_footie. Can’t either of you bash Clinton AND Bush at the same time though?

Comment by oxide
2007-03-21 09:01:21

Um, outsourcing AND illegal insourcing were going full-bore under Clinton and Bush. Can I bash both?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 09:06:33

Feel free. We’ve got exactly the leadership we deserved.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Sic Semper Realtor
2007-03-21 05:52:18

Two things. A friend of mine knows a guy who works (worked) for Toll Bros. He is (was) a project manager. We went shooting with him once and didn’t think the bust would be a big deal. Well, he got laid off last week. Whoops.

Secondly, last week, somebody posted a link to a guy on the radio that was a “bubble head”. Can you repost that or can you all post any radio simulcast/webcast that you listen to? I like to listen to this stuff at work, but I can’t find anything here in MN. Thanks.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-21 05:56:00

Just listen to the KQ morning show. It’s less stressful than all of the housing lies.

Comment by Sic Semper Realtor
2007-03-21 15:51:11

I usually listen to the KQ webcast until about 1pm. After that, the only thing I know about that has any aspect of scheudenfreud is Dave Ramsey.

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 05:57:24

Please tell me his name isn’t Cheney?

 
Comment by dude
2007-03-21 06:18:13

1700AM out of san diego has some bubblicious types. Also KLSX in LA 97.1FM on Saturday mornings.
The guys Saturday morning are actually starting to admit that if you bought in the last 2 years you are toast. They shill for out of state investments boasting cash on cash return.

 
Comment by lavi d
2007-03-21 12:32:38

http://www.npr.org/search.php?text=real+estate+investors

I’m not the guy who posted originally, but there’s a bunch of great stories here.

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-03-21 05:56:49

¿Bulletproof?

March 21 (Bloomberg) — Morgan Stanley, the world’s second- biggest securities firm by market value, said first-quarter profit rose 70 percent to a record on trading gains and a jump in investment-banking fees.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=anpG34E8WB6Q&refer=home

 
Comment by JA
2007-03-21 06:01:15

I just quickly ran some numbers to see what a 25bps raise really would do for homeowners in ARMS.

For a $300k mortgage 25bp increase means about $50 a month, $600p.a.
A $500k mortgage will be hit with $80 a month, $960p.a.

Good bye satellite radio, premium cable, $12 lunch sandwiches, ….

Comment by lvrenter
2007-03-21 09:12:55

If one is so close to the line that those small changes in monthly disposable income push him over, then they’re screwed before the interest rate changes, either way.

 
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2007-03-21 10:13:11

Maybe we’ll get lucky and they will shut off the high-speed internet connection to their spyware-infested zombie spam-mailing home computers.

 
 
Comment by housegeek
2007-03-21 06:14:24

I don’t say this nearly enough: Bravo Ben! I remember when your posts were the length of a bar of soap and the comments were sparse (and often hostile), but you kept at the grindstone. Just marveling at your tireless superlong news wrapup on the post below– with it’s 300-plus commenters. Wow, times sure have changed. Thanks for helping them change — hope your reader traffic continues to soar!

Comment by Big V
2007-03-21 14:10:02

“The length of a bar of soap”.

I like that. This revives the term “soap box”. It’s really cool.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfruede
2007-03-21 16:43:28

Yep, I remember when a supercharged topic in here (usually featuring DL) would draw maybe sixty comments, usually from a core group of about 15 posters. I’ve often wondered about the site stats - how many hits it gets a month.

It was kind of fun “back in the day” (circa early 2005) when there were still a few Kool-Aid Imbibers like LVLandlord to kick around. They fought a doomed rear-guard action for awhile, then just vanished, probably into their parents’ basements.

Comment by Chip
2007-03-21 18:47:01

My favorite was Homeowner_MA. A diehard housing bull, now buried way more than six feet under.

 
 
 
Comment by flatffplan
Comment by NOVA
2007-03-21 07:10:01

Fedex overnight? Isn’t that how refi docs were sent for signature?

What a post from you and no fed worker bashing?

 
Comment by Sunsetbeachguy
2007-03-21 07:12:46

In college I worked for UPS.

They always bragged that their shipping volumes would inform them of an uptick in the economy long before any economist could.

I suppose the converse is true as well.

 
 
Comment by SDsurfer
2007-03-21 06:41:32

Nice article in the San Diego Union business section today: “San Diego subprime specialist gets loan, $200 million deal helps accredited.”

Had to laugh, a subprime lender Accredited Home Lenders, got a subprime loan, its a 5 year loan at 13% interest that also includes warrants and other payment goodies for the hedge fund that granted the loan.

Now that’s justice!

Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-21 07:31:01

San Diego subprime specialist gets loan
$200 million deal helps Accredited
By Mike Freeman
STAFF WRITER
March 21, 2007

Troubled subprime mortgage firm Accredited Home Lenders has agreed to a $200 million loan from a San Francisco hedge fund that’s already one of the San Diego company’s largest shareholders.

The five-year loan from Farallon Funds could provide a lifeboat for Accredited to either survive the current liquidity crisis roiling the subprime business or be acquired.

But the financing didn’t come cheap. Farallon will receive a 13 percent interest rate on the loan, making it the corporate equivalent of a subprime residential mortgage.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20070321/news_1b21lend.html

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 07:50:08

As I mentioned yesterday, The Farallon Islands are a bleak place…

Many years ago, I bought some gold rush era California fractional gold coins (25 Cents, 50 Cents and Dollars) from the ultimate sleazy treasure hunter (hey, sometimes coins show up from the weirdest of sources, as coins would be the one thing throughout the history of mankind, since around 2500 b.c., that never gets thrown away) and he had dived illegally, (time is on my side, the statute of limitation has long since passed, for any transgressions in my purchasing these coins from said submerger) around the Farallons, a graveyard for 19th century sailing ships, with wickedly rough waters, funny, Really a stupid name for a financial concern…

But I digress,

I was kinda querying him, more from a mental stimulation standpoint, than anything else and I asked what the scariest part of diving was and he said “Whitey” and I thought it was some rival rogue diver~

He was talking about the Great White Sharks, that regularily prowl the waters…

Comment by packman
2007-03-21 09:08:06

Yeah - as a matter of fact there is a great white research center on the Farallons. At one time you could take a dive in a cage to feed them, but I think they nixed that from the public.

W/regards to the naming of the finance company - perhaps it depends on your perspective. It’s a very appropriate name if they consider themselves the sharks!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by jh in ohio
2007-03-21 06:42:20

Here’s what I’m seeing in Cincinnati:
- Prices don’t seem to be coming down yet except on foreclosures (one I tracked dropped from 165k to 140k, houses on the same street are listed at 180 to 200k and not moving).
- Everybody I know who works in RE is getting killed (one works for a builder, another is a mortgage loan officer and third is realtor) because nothing’s selling.
- TONS of RE ads on the radio (don’t know about TV, I have a DVR). Local firm Sibcy Cline has ads stating it’s a great “Move up market”, which I guess is like saying “it’s a great time to buy..or sell”.
One of the mortage lenders is pushing people to go ahead and buy that house without selling yours first because they offer a bridge loan with no payments for a year! I wonder how ugly the terms are.
- Hard to tell DOM because our MLS doesn’t show listing dates, however I have my own system. If the trees in the listing picture have leaves, I know it’s been listed for at least 6 months. And I see a lot of those.

Comment by flatffplan
2007-03-21 06:49:02

how do you come down from 160 K ?
auction in bloomington hills MI for 135K
wow cash out of the coasts and head inland

 
Comment by ragerunner
2007-03-21 07:48:12

I live in the Cincy area as well and I would agree. The builders are in big trouble. I work with the building community and I can tell you they are really being push to the limit. I can’t believe how much inventory they are sitting on right now and how little construction is going on. I have even seen several homes in upscale neighborhoods that had tyvek exposed last summer and fall, that still have not been covered. If this house of cards doesn’t improve by this fall I think we will start seeing the BKs. You have got to wonder how in a market like Cincy, that has almost no population growth, could get such a glut of new unsold homes on the market. What a mess!!!

Comment by Auger-Inn
2007-03-21 09:46:48

If you work with these dolts, how about giving them a clue? Like, “lower the friggin prices”! I find it hard to believe they are at their margin already and can’t go lower?

 
 
Comment by Chip
2007-03-21 18:53:30

“Prices don’t seem to be coming down yet …”

Admittedly, this is picky, but the accurate term is “asking prices,” not just “prices.” There likely will be a large and growing difference between “asking” and “selling” prices.

 
 
Comment by jh in ohio
2007-03-21 06:46:51

sorry about double post… check out this own vs rent calculation on one of our builder’s sites: Maple Street Homes.
See if you can find the GROSS math/logic error (not to mention their assumptions). I wrote them about it and they still didn’t get it.

Comment by WestSideGeorge
2007-03-21 07:01:30

1. They both add lost “tax savings” to rent and subtract “tax savings” from cost of ownership. Double counting on this count.
2. Mortgage payment does not include taxes, insurance, repairs. Not apples to apples.
3. In what market is an amortizing mortgage payment only 5% higher than equivalent rent?

Comment by jh in ohio
2007-03-21 07:24:18

Bingo! I’m not surprised by #2 and #3, I’ve come to expect that from RE shills. But #1 is just idiotic. Wonder what percentage of their customers would catch the error? 1 out of 100?

 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2007-03-21 06:52:17

As I’ve said before, it seems that some of these loans were written with foreclosure in mind, on the assumption that rising values would allow the lender to get their money back after squeezing the borrower for a while.

How is this for a bailout? Congress could pass an exception to the new tougher bankrupcy law. If it can be shown that a borrower could not have qualified for a loan after a reset, the lender gets the property and that’s it. The borrower can walk away with no taxes due.

This would involve a loss for all the guilty parties — the borrower goes back to renting, and the lender taxes a hit on home values falling from inflated levels. But it would allow everyone to start over.

The counter-argument — some prime borrowers who might otherwise struggle to pay for a depreciating asset and live in poverty for 30 years would instead choose to default. But that just means the victims suffer while the grifters, especially those who put nothing down, walk away from a heads I win, tails you lose arrangement.

 
Comment by tim916
2007-03-21 07:12:26

I want to make some members of my extended family aware of the direness of the housing situation and how it could impact the economy. Is there a particular article that anyone can recommend that explains things in a way that is not too technical? I’ve read many over the last few weeks, but, foolishly, I’ve not bookmarked them. Any recommendations?

Comment by Big V
2007-03-21 15:01:06

Try this link:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/03/18/BUG9AOMAJH66.DTL

The Article:

Why subprime mortgage crisis may have impact on stocks, lending and spending
Carolyn Said, Chronicle Staff Writer

Sunday, March 18, 2007

“No Credit, no savings — no problem!”

That could be the motto for the subprime lending industry. And that simple slogan might just end up knocking the props out from under the U.S. economy.

Until a few months ago, someone with tarnished credit and meager assets could find dozens of lenders offering a no-money-down, interest-only mortgage for several hundred thousand dollars. To sweeten the pot, many such loans were “no doc” — meaning potential borrowers could simply state their income instead of producing documents such as pay stubs to verify it. In the trade, they call these “liar loans.”

Subprime loans to people with poor credit have ballooned to $1.3 trillion, accounting for a fifth of all new mortgages last year.

And that’s turning into a major threat to the economy.

The subprime industry has begun to implode as many credit-challenged borrowers fall behind. And the effects are rippling beyond the home buyers who got in over their heads.

Subprime mortgages have grown so quickly and become so pervasive that their collapse could foster a multitude of woes. Subprime defaults could wallop Wall Street institutions with huge losses, further undermine the already-soft housing market and drag down consumer spending.

In a worst-case scenario, the turmoil could trigger a recession the way the savings-and-loan scandal did nearly two decades ago.

Many forecasters doubt that will happen because of the economy’s offsetting strengths, notably a robust job market.

Still, anxiety over subprime loans is mounting among economists, Wall Street traders, banking regulators and government officials.

Congress is looking at ways to shore up the industry. Fear about subprime loans was a major catalyst for the stock market swoon this month.

Here is a rundown on who could get hurt if subprime problems spread:

– Subprime borrowers. First up are the folks who took out mortgages they couldn’t afford, seduced by a hot housing market. While prices were rising, many borrowers saw their homes increase in value. That masked the problem because they could refinance based on that increased equity. Or they could sell their homes for a profit or at least enough to pay off the mortgage.

But now that housing prices are stagnating, the options of refinancing or selling have slammed shut. People who bought homes they couldn’t afford face the prospect of losing them through foreclosure, forfeiting their down payments and having their credit ruined. The Center for Responsible Lending, a consumer advocacy group, predicts that 2.2 million subprime borrowers will wind up in foreclosure in the next few years.

– Speculators. Real-estate buyers who rushed into markets such as Las Vegas and Phoenix to snap up homes, hoping to “flip” them for quick profits, could lose big.

– Subprime lenders. Companies that make subprime loans are already disintegrating because of delinquent and defaulting borrowers. In the past three months, 35 subprime mortgage companies have gone out of business. Of the 25 biggest, about half are out of business or so severely impaired that they are not making any new loans, according to Chris Low, chief economist at FTN Financial in New York, a capital markets arm of prime mortgage lender First Horizon National Bank.

Subprime lenders are in the business of originating loans, not holding them for the long term.

Typically, they “securitize” the mortgages, that is, bundle them up and sell them to investors. That brings in new cash so they can make more loans.

But most securitization deals include a clause saying if the loan goes bad in the first three months, the originating mortgage company has to buy it back, Low noted. So many loans have gone bad that subprime lenders have been unable to keep up.

The lenders rely on lines of credit from investors who buy mortgages to finance their operations. But those buyers have stopped buying and subprime lenders are seeing their credit dry up.

– Wall Street firms and other big institutions that bought the loans. Subprime mortgages get packaged, sliced and diced to create a range of products with different levels of risk. Such mortgage-backed securities have become popular investment vehicles in recent years. Subprime loans carry interest rates two to five percentage points higher than those to borrowers with good credit, so theoretically they offer a high enough return to offset the risks.

“They are bought broadly,” said Steve Cochrane, senior economist at Moody’s Economy.com, a forecasting service in Pennsylvania. “Many are held by investment banks, hedge funds, international investors of many sorts.”

The big question is exactly who holds them.

“Part of the panic the other day when the stock market was tumbling was trying to figure out who’s on the hook for these bonds,” Low said.

In the coming weeks, some victims of spending sprees in subprime mortgage securities will be revealed as Wall Street firms report financial results.

If major Wall Street firms have to write off billions of dollars in investments, that could further chill the stock market and have repercussions throughout the financial sector.

– Other borrowers. Financial institutions might react to the subprime implosion by clamping down on other kinds of borrowing. If money is harder to get, the economy suffers because it’s harder for businesses to expand and consumers to spend.

“It could create a fair amount of uncertainty in investment markets, so that all investors would become overly cautious and freeze up, stop trading,” Cochrane said. “That could limit the flow of capital in the U.S. economy and the global economy, and create a credit crunch.”

Cochrane says he thinks there is about a 25 percent chance that could happen. The results would be far-reaching.

“Right now you might say there’s a bit of a credit squeeze, largely focused on subprime holders. If the lending industry stopped lending or became increasingly tight on prime mortgages, commercial loans, industrial loans, revolving credit, it could very quickly work to slow the economy down and push it into recession,” he said.

– The housing market. The subprime collapse threatens to turn the real estate slowdown into a meltdown. Lenders have started to tighten their standards, meaning that fewer buyers — both prime and subprime — qualify for loans. That lessens demand and increases inventory.

With subprime buyers no longer in the picture, “There are a lot fewer people out there competing to buy homes, on top of which, because foreclosures are so high, there is a steady stream of houses hitting the market,” Low said.

“It means the supply-demand imbalance remains for another couple of years, putting downward pressure on prices.”

– Consumer spending. The stimulus from rising real estate prices has been one of the main engines of the economy in the past few years, as people bought and furnished new homes, and borrowed against existing homes for big-ticket purchases such as remodels and cars.

If homes are worth less, people find it harder to sell them and harder to borrow against them. That means consumers will tighten their belts and the whole economy will take a hit.

E-mail Carolyn Said at csaid@sfchronicle.com.

 
 
Comment by NOVA
2007-03-21 07:15:32

No. VA continues to amaze me. The foreclosures really leaped for both Fairfax and Loudoun county last week. Average rate of increase is about 10 a month for Loudoun since Sept 06. Interesting, I think considering the lag this all the ones who couldnt sell last Summer.

Banks with the foreclosures are marking them up far more than the original owner was trying to sell them for.

Prices are really not moving in the Fairfax suburbs and sales are still happening. I think based on conversations it’s military that is buying.

Comment by Arwen U.
2007-03-21 08:15:31

I’m out past Prince William County, and it appears as though most of the new listings are marked with “Wishing Prices” based on . . . I don’t know . . . hoopla over the last few months that things were “bottoming”?

Still, even in Fairfax County, there are properties selling for up to 20% below the last sales price. Usually these are in the less-desirable areas such as Herndon, Woodbridge, and Centreville.

I should do a post at http://novabubblefallout.blogspot.com on nearly identical houses (in No. VA) priced 100K apart. If you check out http://www.bubbleinfo.com, there is a quote from Robert Cote about this:

“It’s the same word I used 4 months ago for ther same reason(s). Froth. Caution math stuff ahead. The nature of discrete particles (individual houses) in a non-homogeneous environment (location, location) being acted upon by random forces (buyers market) will exhibit non-linear (prices all over the place) behavior in the short term (monthly sales). Clear as mud?”

Comment by John Fontain
2007-03-21 09:21:01

“nearly identical houses (in No. VA) priced 100K apart”

i see this all the time in Arlington. there is no consistency in pricing. some sellers are dropping their prices compared to peak levels, while others with similar homes are asking 20% above peak levels. seems like a lot of sellers are high on something.

 
 
Comment by packman
2007-03-21 09:15:28

NOVA - out of curiosity, where do you get your numbers?

I’ve been tracking Loudoun on foreclosure.com since October - it’s been a relatively steady increase as you say though actually somewhat bigger numbers - I’ve seen it go from 149 on 10/21 to 271 today - an increase of about 25 per month. It took a big jump not so much last week (5 new), but has in the last 4 days (13 new!).

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 07:31:15

I volunteer @ the local history museum 3 hours a week and as luck would have it, we were short a volunteer and the magic of the real estate game, despite being in it’s dying throes, came through for us last week.

A local tinhorn realtor decided she’s gonna get all civic minded and volunteered for her 3 hour cruise, a 3 hour cruise…

She revealed to me her modus operandi, she’d just snag all the people that came into the museum, like so many pigs marching towards the abattoir, for slaughter~

I didn’t have the heart to tell her that we get very few people in the museum and the few that do are Europeans, on holiday, looking a little lost.

Good fortune comes in mysterious ways…

Comment by nhz
2007-03-21 09:41:42

I guess she is lucky then, because the Europeans are still buying everywhere; most of them are totally unaware of what is going on with US RE and they will snap up the first bargain they get offered …

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 11:39:12

Just had a charming Tahitian couple in…

That just wanted to see the biggest living things in the world~

No sale!

 
 
 
Comment by BM
2007-03-21 07:31:23

We in California can’t let those in AZ have all the fun. Anyone in LA interested in getting together for a bubble beer?

I know LALawyer was interested. I’ve gone out with LA Renter before. Anyone else on the west side? Imploder? sm_landlord?

Fun times!

Comment by speedingpullet
2007-03-21 10:28:33

Speedingpullet, too.
Technically, in SFV, but a girl can dream…. ;-)

Comment by BM
2007-03-21 12:01:52

I’ll add ya to the list! In Friday’s bits bucket I’ll pick a time/place and we’ll see who shows up.

 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-21 07:35:15

Rental vacancy rates are up in SD to their highest level since 1995, but ‘expert’ nonetheless expects rents to rise…
————————————————————————————-
Vacancy rate highest since ‘95
Several reasons cited in S.D. rental report

By Roger Showley
STAFF WRITER

March 21, 2007

Apartment complex vacancies in San Diego County rose to their highest level in 12 years, spurred by new construction, condo converters caught with empty units and a growing number of individuals renting condos to upwardly mobile tenants, MarketPointe Realty Advisors reported yesterday.

Graphic: March’s county apartment market
In its semiannual report Rental Trends, covering the last six months of apartment activity, the real estate consulting company said the vacancy rate will stand at 4.5 percent as of March 31, compared with 1.8 percent in September and 3.1 percent a year ago. This represented the highest vacancy rate since 4.96 percent in March 1995.

The average rent countywide stood at $1,261, up $20 from September when the last survey was conducted, and up $50 from a year ago.

MarketPointe checks rents and vacancies twice a year on institutional-grade apartment complexes with at least 20 units, thus leaving out small investors and individuals who rent out single-family homes, condos, townhouses and small apartment buildings.

For the latest period, 113,498 units in 790 complexes were surveyed, representing about 26.2 percent of all renter-occupied units countywide.

MarketPointe President Russ Valone said the vacancy rate is rising because more rentals are on the market.

“A couple of new projects came out, and there were some conversions that went back to the marketplace,” Valone said.

But Valone said rents are likely to increase over the next few months because of the wide gap between lower rental costs and higher mortgage payments.

“Rents have been held down over the past couple of years and they seem to be pushing up a little bit,” he said. “We might see, over the course of the next year, instead of 3 percent increases, more 4 to 5 percent increases.”

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20070321/news_1b21rental.html

Comment by SDMisfit
2007-03-21 08:26:50

I moved from a condo renting for $1,250 to an apartment renting for $900. Prices are expected to go up despite the increased vacancy rate?? I’m not paying higher rent simply because some wealthy property owner has a higher mortgage payment. I’m saving 40% of my paycheck aftertax ao I could afford to pay more but I simply wont.

Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-21 08:42:16

“Prices are expected to go up despite the increased vacancy rate??”

That’s right. The laws of economics have been repealed by REIC decree.

Comment by zeropointzero
2007-03-21 11:54:24

Replace “expected” with “hoped” and the statement become accurate. However, even this hope is misplaced — increased rental inventory will lead to lower prices, unless there is some kind of added demand pressure. And, as properties go vacant/unsold — more will eventually move into rental inventory, representing the segment of owners who are ready and able to take some kind of monthly haircut in lieu of selling at what they perceive to be insufficient price. Some will be able to wait it out, but I suspect reality will pick them off one by one over the next months and years.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Big V
2007-03-21 15:23:29

Let me tell you a story …

My back-yard neighbor (who rents the in-law unit attached to the front house) moved out because my landlord got uppety and thought he didn’t have to fix the leaky roof, which led to a mold infestation. This after raising her rent by 5% twice in one year.

He arrogantly waited an entire month before even beginning to get the place ready to rent out. It took another month to get another guy intersted in the place. The interest didn’t surface until the landlord had refinished the cabinets, installed new floors and a new refrigerator, repainted the dump, and thrown in a cute shower curtain.

The new guy hasn’t moved in yet, but he will bring a 105 lb dog to live with him in the tiny studio with tiny yard. He’s a nice dog, but my cat really hates him, but that’s beside the point.

The landlord boasted that he was going to “jack up the rent”, but the new guy is paying the same price as the old tenant, even though he’s getting a completely renovated place and will have a huge dog living with him.

Also, said landlord has been particularly onry lately, and I found out that it was because he had 4 vacancies all at once, all in the midst of refinancing every property he owns.

Although he did raise our rent by 5% at the beginning of the year (thanks to the NAR’s little price collusion attempt), there is no way this guy will even attempt another rent increase.

 
 
 
Comment by Chip
2007-03-21 19:07:22

“…I could afford to pay more but I simply wont.”

SDMisfit — good for you. Smart, accurate, profiting.

 
 
Comment by PBRenter
2007-03-21 10:14:33

I’m looking for a place to rent in North County Coastal right now. I’ve pretty much determined that most of the “Rent to Cover My Payment” types post on Craigslist while the long time owners with actual affordable rents are on the UT’s and SDReader’s websites.

Comment by CA renter
2007-03-22 03:23:08

We’re in No. County coastal area & will keep an eye out. What are you looking for (condo/sfh/???)?

 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-21 07:58:51

Is SD in a residential construction recession? Behold the evidence:

http://www.marketpointe.com/ppp/MarketPointe%20Overview%20PresCouncil%20Jan%202007.pdf

Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-03-21 08:45:18

Looks like a recession to me. Pitiful. All of the data looks pretty bad however the pitiful job creation over the last five years and new construction sales at levels not seen since 90/91 stand out to me.

 
 
Comment by txchick57
2007-03-21 07:59:09

I found this amusing but I have a warped sense of humor:

Judge Clark Protects the Brooklyn Bridge
Posted: March 20th, 2007, 7:52am PDT
The prolific Judge Leif Clark, who has written many memorable footnotes, including one quoted here yesterday, has written another one which is both quotable and addresses an important point. In In re Rendon, No. 06-52501 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 3/15/07), a party who claimed to be purchasing a home from the debtors filed a Motion to Create Equitable Lien/Motion for Expedited or Emergency Hearing. The court found that the motion requested three forms of relief: an order quieting title, an injunction and an objection to the debtors’ claim of exemption. The court found that the first two forms of relief must be brought in an adversary proceeding and dismissed the motion without prejudice. The court found that the objection to exemptions was untimely and must be denied. Even though the purchasers were not listed as creditors in the bankruptcy, they admitted that they had actual knowledge of the bankruptcy case prior to the 341 meeting.

The court noted that the mere fact that the debtors had successfully claimed the property as exempt did not establish their ownership of the property. In a footnote, the court added the following comment:

“Just in case there is any confusion, let’s suppose I claim an exemption on the Brooklyn Bridge, and you fail to timely object to my exemption claim. Is the sainted bridge thus exempt? Technically, section 522(l) says it is. But of course, what difference does my exemption claim make if Hizzoner, Mayor Bloomberg, comes to court and successfully establishes that, in fact, the Brooklyn Bridge is not my bridge to claim, but is safely still the property of the City of New York, safely untarnished by my exercise in hubris? None at all you correctly reply, none whatsoever.”

It is important to note that an exemption merely determines whether property is excluded from the estate. However, it does not operate to grant title to the property. Mayor Bloomberg will no doubt sleep more soundly.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-21 08:49:27

That’s funny, I sold that bridge numerous times…

 
Comment by Kathy
2007-03-21 09:48:32

Law geek humor. I like it.

 
 
Comment by crispy&cole
2007-03-21 08:04:21

Local realty office to close

http://bakersfieldbubble.blogspot.com

Comment by crispy&cole
2007-03-21 08:15:14

What happened to the spring rally? Who closes their offices right before the busiest time of the year for realtors?

 
Comment by Chip
2007-03-21 19:12:23

“We were approaching break even.”

Nah. Bet they were way below break-even. Nobody in the happy-talk industry closes down when net income is still positive. Such farsightedness exists in other industries, perhaps, and certainly in Ben’s blog, but not in Happyland.

 
 
Comment by DannyHSDad
2007-03-21 08:04:42

If RE layoffs aren’t enough about this:

Three construction workers on their way to breakfast during a midmorning break were shot, one of them fatally, after an unidentified gunman opened fire on their sport utility vehicle on a Pomona street, authorities said.

2 weeks ago or so, a sign spinner was murdered in the high desert result of drive by shooting. I’ll reply to this post if I can find the link…

Comment by Neil
2007-03-21 08:10:21

A sign spinner shot? That’s horrible.

Of all the things this bubble produced, I happen to like the sign spinners. Good ones are truly artists. :( I hope the fiends are caught.

Neil

 
 
 
Comment by agitated in sd
2007-03-21 08:05:03

i have a pending out of my crappy lease and ive been looking at places. prices are back down to 2005 levels. landlords are taking pets, lowering prices and these are nice detached places. fingers crossed.

Comment by Wickedheart
2007-03-21 08:39:03

I noticed that too. What a world of difference from when I was looking for a SFH to rent last summer.

 
 
Comment by BM
2007-03-21 08:17:00

Anyone listen to Marketplace last night with the interview with the old lady from Upland, CA? She admitted she was overcome with greed, although the slimy loan brokers made it a bit too easy to get in too deep. Fascinating spot. Should get a transcript and add it to a post today, Ben!

Comment by cassiopeia
2007-03-21 13:01:28

Yes, BM, I caught that. I liked that she did not make excuses for herself. That allowed me to actually feel pity for her.
I’m sure Ben has already taken note and will post, but for those of you who get the paper version of the WSJ, there is a big article in Opinion called Mortgage Meltdown by one Andy Laperriere, who I think has been doing secret interviews with Ben, Get Stucco, Neil, etc. etc. It was strange to be sitting in the gym and reading that kind of article in a big newspaper. Meanwhile, today’s LA Times business article on how subprimers can get ahead and “save” the economy was nauseating. Read it, but make sure there’s a bathroom nearby.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-economy21mar21,1,2144311.story?coll=la-headlines-business

Comment by lavi d
2007-03-21 13:39:01

“…he’s qualified for a conventional 30-year fixed-rate mortgage on a $750,000 house he hopes to move to in Orange County after he sells his current home.”

Who’s going to buy his current home???

Comment by cassiopeia
2007-03-21 21:42:22

A knife catcher, if he gets lucky.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by lavi d
2007-03-21 13:36:32

Yeah.

Apparently there’s another one on Marketplace Weekend coming up.

 
 
Comment by ockurt
2007-03-21 08:17:23

Home equity may keep U.S. out of recession (LAT)

http://tinyurl.com/yqpfxy

Comment by seattle price drop
2007-03-21 12:54:14

Thanks for that link. We are so screwed.

Did anybody see the article (in the UK Daily Mail?) yesterday wherein a Bank of England chief (equivalent of our Fed?) admitted that they pushed a policy of personal indebtedness the past several years (to hold up consumer spending) in order to keep recession at bay.

Obviously, that’s been our plan in the US for economic “stability” also.

The Heloc thing has been being promoted like crazy for about a year up here. People have taken out HELOC’s on fully paid off properties, indebting themselves where they were debt-free a few years ago.

The lenders and policy makers have trully gone berserk. The US and Britain, the old world economies, have apparently fizzled completely and now must rely on debt expenditures, no real production at all.

Comment by nhz
2007-03-22 02:44:01

same story in Netherlands, except that government debt seems to be under control here. 15 years ago the Dutch were the savings champion of the world (they have been like that for most of the last four centuries), but now private debt is soaring and approaching that of US and UK citizens. No problem of course, because Dutch home prices rising even faster than private debt. And just like US/UK, finance and related services is now the most important pillar of the economy; hardly any real production left.

 
 
 
Comment by ockurt
2007-03-21 08:27:32

Lender files for bankruptcy (OCR)

Subprime’s meltdown continues as People’s Choice in Irvine files Chapter 11.

http://tinyurl.com/2bax3a

 
Comment by ockurt
2007-03-21 08:30:05

O.C. home-price overvaluation on the decline (JL’s blog, OCR)

Orange County homes are no longer “extremely overvalued,” according to a quarterly study of the economics behind major U.S. housing markets by Global Insight and National City.

O.C. single family homes were 33.5% overvalued in the fourth quarter, the 61st highest among 317 U.S. markets. In the third quarter, O.C. homes were 35.9% overvalued, 57th highest in the nation. O.C. overvaluation peaked at 37.2% in 2006’s second quarter. Global Insight/National City have O.C. home prices flat in 2006’s second half.

Global Insight and National City consider an overvaluation in excess of 35% to be “extreme overvaluation.” They say: “Markets with valuation premiums above 35 percent were deemed at risk for price corrections based on the typical degree of overvaluation that preceded the 63 known local market price declines observed since 1985.”

O.C. is nowhere near the top of current overvaluation mountain by this math. Naples, Fla., was the most overvalued at 79.9% at year-end 2006.

It’s worth noting that in the last boom, O.C. housing’s overvaluation once led the nation: In the fourth quarter of 1989, when prices were 27.2% too high, by this math.

O.C.’s drop in overvaluation was not rare. Global Insight/National City says: “Markets identified in the study as over-valued decreased to 57 metro areas in the fourth quarter from 60 metro areas (revised) in the third quarter. As it has for the past several quarters, the greatest incidence of overvaluation continues to exist in pockets along the Atlantic and Pacific Coasts. New England, however, no longer appears to be significantly overvalued, while Orange County, CA; Tucson, AZ; Reno and Carson City, NV; and Kingston, NY also fell below the threshold denoting extreme overvaluation. Meanwhile, parts of Texas continued to experience above-average price increases in the latest quarter, but also continued to have the highest concentration of under-valued markets in the nation.”

Comment by OCBear
2007-03-21 09:15:10

This is where JL gets the RE Shill Label again.

He notes:

O.C. single family homes were 33.5% overvalued in the fourth quarter

and,

It’s worth noting that in the last boom, O.C. housing’s overvaluation once led the nation: In the fourth quarter of 1989, when prices were 27.2% too high, by this math.

Yet when you read the couple paragraphs it reads like affordability is back baby.

For shame, for shame, for shame.

 
 
Comment by evil doc
2007-03-21 08:42:17
Comment by bearbanker
2007-03-21 10:11:41

My understanding is that app declines are way up! I also understand that 21% of new apps are for ARMs, yet the spread between ARMs and Fixed is only 17 bp. Why any lender would push an ARM right now is beyond me. Unless, of course, his/her commish is better . . . sorry, answered my own question.

 
Comment by Chip
2007-03-21 19:25:42

That bothers me a lot — applications. Like the corny old joke, “We have a partial score: Philadelphia 6.”

The only thing that matters to me at this point in the crunch is “mortgage loan approvals.” Haven’t seen any measure of that, yet.

 
Comment by Chip
2007-03-21 19:33:38

That bothers me a lot — applications. Like the corny old joke, “We have a partial score: Philadelphia 6.”

The only thing that matters to me at this point in the crunch is “mortgage loan approvals.” Haven’t seen any measure of that, yet.

As for deflation, I may be wrong, but I think that we quite likely are in for a period of asset (think housing) deflation riding right alongside consumables inflation. JSP will never know what hit him. As intended.

 
 
Comment by SDMisfit
2007-03-21 09:06:57

Here is an idea to get some publicity and slant the news differently:

How about we find a young couple with toddlers and get them to sue Alan Greenspan for reckless expansion of the money supply and inflating house prices out of reach. Sure, the case will be dismissed but it could get a lot of publicity. Or we could sue one of the lenders or one of the Wall Street investment banks. Just to get people talking in a different way.

We’ll need an attractive family that was saving a 20% downpayment to buy a house in 2003 but prices skyrocketed so they couldn’t buy without taking out a suicide loan.

 
Comment by Groundhogday
2007-03-21 09:17:23

If inflation is all about expectations (I’m not sure that is completely true), then home prices HAVE to be included in inflation calculations. What we are running into here in Pullman, WA is that builders and current home owners now EXPECT double digit annual appreciation. So if a comp next door sold last year for $200k, then I’ll list my house at $230k. If I’m a builder with inventory left over from last year, I’ll just mark it up by 10% in January. Some buyers are certainly starting to resist, negotiate, wait, etc… but some that listen too much to real estate agents swallow this appreciation expectation whole.

The question is: how long does it take to erase these expectations? Certainly one year of a slow market and bad media coverage isn’t enough.

Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-21 09:39:33

“If inflation is all about expectations (I’m not sure that is completely true),”

Not true. A huge inventory overhang of durable assets at overvalued price levels (such as California houses) creates deflationary pressure. Witness what happened in Japan’s housing market from 1990-2006 — the BOJ could only push on a string while watching prices deflate.

Comment by Groundhogday
2007-03-21 17:44:29

Yes, it seems we will eventually face deflation (or perhaps hyperinflation should Bernanke choose that route), but over hte past 4-5 years we’ve experienced fantastic asset inflation. And expectations still linger that this will continue.

 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-21 09:36:44

South Korean subprime lending is shrinking
U.S. industry’s crisis has ripple effect in smaller Asian sector
Reuters
Published: March 21, 2007

SEOUL: Subprime lending was going out of fashion in South Korea well before the U.S. crisis struck.

Now it looks set to shrink even further.

The industry, which offers consumer and mortgage loans to the riskiest borrowers, is in crisis in the United States as default levels have risen, squeezing lenders and sending shivers through global markets.

But in South Korea, loans from subprime players and others outside the mainstream lending industry represent only 5.5 percent of the country’s gross domestic product, compared with 20 percent for the United States, according to Samsung Securities.

A crackdown on mortgages since late last year, aimed at cooling red-hot property prices, has been slowing demand for home loans this year, regulatory data show. Government plans to tighten rules on the subprime sector will cap the sector’s growth further.

As a result, the $50 billion industry, led by global banks like Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers and Citigroup, was already seeing a drop in demand, said Jang Byoung In, president of the mortgage lender GEM Investment Finance.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/21/yourmoney/mortgage.php

Comment by seattle price drop
2007-03-21 13:10:14

Nice to see that *somebody’s* learning from our mistakes, even if we can’t seem to ourselves.

These big banks may be screwed long term. They’ve tapped Americans out and, I think , made the assumption that once they were through with us they could throw us to the dogs and move on to Asia.

There’s been a huge push the past couple years by them to turn the Chinese into permanent debtors, I guess to replace the Americans once we’ve been wrung dry. Hopefully the Asians will surprise them by “just saying NO”.

About 10 years ago, there was a best-seller in China called “Just Say No to America”.

 
 
Comment by beehive
2007-03-21 10:22:37

Rapidly soaring land values in Maine’s unorganized northern territories are creating a tsunami of legislation:

http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/viewpoints/stein/070321stein.html

Comment by Portland Mainer
2007-03-21 13:13:44

Th nation’s largest RE Investment Trust, Plum Creek is trying to take over the north woods of Maine. If they succeed, the entire place will be developed.

 
 
Comment by ockurt
2007-03-21 10:39:51

Home equity could buoy economy (LAT)

http://tinyurl.com/2m8ocx

 
Comment by ockurt
2007-03-21 10:57:28

Irvine expects growth spurt (OCR)

http://tinyurl.com/27ff5o

 
Comment by Seattle Renter
2007-03-21 11:01:28

Sorry if this double posts, but the first one didn’t seem to go through:

It may have already been posted, but did anyone read kunstler’s monday article. I would have laughed my ass off at the first couple paragraphs if the implications weren’t so sad. I’m starting to think that maybe Greenspan is actually the personification of the lawyer character in “Idiocracy”

from http://www.kunstler.com/ the paragraphs in question:

Amazing Mental Rot
From the Florida Sun-Sentinel:
BOCA RATON – Retired Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, speaking at a Futures Industry Association annual conference here on Thursday, said the problems of the subprime mortgage market had more to do with home prices than easy credit.
“If we could wave a wand and housing prices go up 10 percent, the subprime mortgage problem would disappear,” he said.

What kind of a rock does this fucking idiot Alan Greenspan live under?
—-

He(Greenspan) can’t be that stupid can he? I can’t believe he doesn’t see the intertwined nature of prices and subprime mortgages. Although I suppose he is correct, for a brief time, 10% appreciation would allow a lot of FBs to refi, but then what? Like the morans(misspelling intentional - see fark.com) who took out toxic sludge mortgages could make the payments on a 30 yr fixed…

Unbelievable.

Thank god you people are here to offer an oasis of sanity amidst the endless desert of moranic insanity.

 
Comment by tl
2007-03-21 12:07:13

Fed holds rates steady. Market rallies strong. What gives?

Comment by T_Slim
2007-03-21 12:10:58

Because these idiots are bullish on the so-called dovish tone. They think that a rate cut is coming. I think the shoe will really drop on the stock market when corporate earnings fall like stones. Idiotic morons everywhere.

 
Comment by seattle price drop
2007-03-21 13:18:44

Seeing the market reaction to that statement clarified for me that we are at a breaking point psychologically/emotionally.

That was the most hawkish statement Bernanke has given since he’s been Fed chief and yet the market interprets it as dovish?

They are clearly grabbing at straws and choosing the “Don’t confuse me with the facts” manic line of thinking.

Kind of like desperate homesellers refusing to believe that prices go down, in the face of everything.

Frankly, I find that deliberate misinterpretation of Bernankes statement very scary.

Comment by Chip
2007-03-21 19:54:36

“…I find that deliberate misinterpretation of Bernankes statement very scary.”

But not shocking.

 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-21 14:00:28

I guess downpayment assistance nips the FHA’s 3% downpayment requirement in the bud. Too bad that those who can’t come up with a downpayment are more likely to get foreclosed.
————————————————————————————-
Don’t Let Subprime Loans Unravel Your Dream

An FHA Home Loan, Combined with Down Payment Assistance Opens Door To Homeownership!

GAITHERSBURG, Md., March 21 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ —
First-time, and low-and-moderate income individuals and families who have their hearts set on becoming homeowners this year, shouldn’t give up hope just because the subprime mortgage industry has unraveled.

Instead, they should focus their attention on longstanding leaders in
affordable housing — the Federal Housing Administration and AmeriDream, Inc.

Most homebuyers have heard about FHA insured loans (the government agency has been around since 1934). But with lenders pushing more exotic subprime loans, FHA took a back seat as a mortgage option for many homebuyers.

Now with subprime loans running into serious trouble, FHA is staging a
comeback and giving homebuyers a better alternative to exotic high-cost
mortgages. And with more homebuyers looking for loan options that required little or no money down, an FHA-insured loan combined with a gift from a nonprofit organization, like AmeriDream, is the perfect choice today for individuals and families trying to achieve the dream of homeownership.

“We believe that every family in America deserving to achieve the dream of homeownership should have the opportunity to do so,” said AmeriDream CEO & President Ann Ashburn. “Our goal is to remove one of the biggest barriers to homeownership - funds needed for a mortgage down payment. We do it by providing down payment assistance to low and moderate income individuals and families.”

Since 1999, AmeriDream has helped over 200,000 individuals and families who qualify for a mortgage loan but lack the money they need for down payment and closing costs become homeowners.

The AmeriDream Downpayment Gift Program is available nationwide to qualifying homebuyers.

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/03-21-2007/0004550770&EDATE=

 
Comment by liquid_observer
2007-03-21 14:08:24

these actions and indicators reek of potential stagflation.. are we going to see a sharp “surprise” increase in rates this year? At some point, uncle Ben is going to need to tighten up supply to fix all of this.

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-21 14:53:26

Yet another sad casualty of the bubble…

“We created Condo Flip in 2004 to be a marketplace where buyers of preconstruction condos in Miami could list their units for sale to other buyers. Up until 2004, we saw thousands of Miami preconstruction condos changing hands.

How Did The Market Change in 2004 and Beyond? We saw a dramatic shift in how preconstruction condos were bought and sold. The condo boom was driven by overly-ambitious speculators, many of whom had been successful in flipping condos in the past. As condo inventories grew and prices rose many speculators realized that further purchasing was increasingly risky. So, buyers just stopped buying.

What Kinds of Results Did Condo Flip See? We saw thousands of sellers, and very few buyers. It didn’t make sense for us to maintain a marketplace where there were few buyers. But, we learned much from this transitioning marketplace, and we are actually very keen on what we see coming next.”

http://condoflip.com/

Comment by Chip
2007-03-21 20:01:01

So they are claiming that the “flip” part of “Condo Flip” did not pertain to overly-ambitious speculators?” I thought that these people were at least in their twenties.

 
 
Comment by Big V
2007-03-21 15:05:12

Sorry if this is a duplicate.

Try this link:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/03/18/BUG9AOMAJH66.DTL

Why subprime mortgage crisis may have impact on stocks, lending and spending
Carolyn Said, Chronicle Staff Writer

Sunday, March 18, 2007

“No credit, no savings — no problem!”

That could be the motto for the subprime lending industry. And that simple slogan might just end up knocking the props out from under the U.S. economy.

Until a few months ago, someone with tarnished credit and meager assets could find dozens of lenders offering a no-money-down, interest-only mortgage for several hundred thousand dollars. To sweeten the pot, many such loans were “no doc” — meaning potential borrowers could simply state their income instead of producing documents such as pay stubs to verify it. In the trade, they call these “liar loans.”

Subprime loans to people with poor credit have ballooned to $1.3 trillion, accounting for a fifth of all new mortgages last year.

And that’s turning into a major threat to the economy.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post