March 29, 2007

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For March 29, 2007

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

284 Comments »

Comment by wmbz
2007-03-29 04:57:50

Home Depot & Wal-mart sales going down? Say it ain’t so.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aVXFG8f01LHw&refer=us

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-29 05:13:16

“Ynigues, 65, makes $2,800 a month as a self-employed music teacher. He says he eats once a day, has stopped paying his utility bills, and is late on payments for his home in Apple Valley, Minnesota, 20 miles south of St. Paul.”

No sympathy for the FBs. Here again is a case that has to be keeping up with the Joneses. Apple Valley is a higher-end suburb of the Twin Cities. This stupid ba$tard could rent in a cheaper area, or even in Apple Valley, for a heck of a lot less. I hope he enjoys his new rathole in North Minneapolis after they kick him out of his current home. Loser!

Comment by txchick57
2007-03-29 05:22:32

Ha. Involuntary CRD (calorie restriction diet). He’ll live longer.

Comment by John Fleming
2007-03-29 05:37:41

One good thing will come out of this disaster. It will solve obesity…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2007-03-29 05:39:15

LOL. Ever looked at the fat and calorie content in Top Ramen or Cheetos?

 
Comment by wmbz
2007-03-29 05:40:50

No, but I have seen the fat content walking in and out of Wal-Mart.

 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-03-29 05:45:08

Bring back trans-fats. They can’t use them any more here in New York and the McDonald’s french fries are just a shell of their former self. Because the lardos can’t control themselves I have to eat bland fries. Nice country this has become.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-29 05:54:14

You know it isn’t so much the fat issue…

I can usually avoid tourons, but sometimes our paths meet and i’m constantly amazed at the low level of fitness in this country.

People that look “normal”, of regular body proportions, that are struggling to walk 1/2 a mile.

 
Comment by Mikey(2)
2007-03-29 06:08:36

LOL. You forgot their laziness - Why not use those stainless cooking appliances for a change before the foreclosure proceedings begin?

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 06:14:10

Use the stainless? Fahgeddaboudit! It’s been ripped out and sold already!

 
Comment by DC in LBV
2007-03-29 07:35:48

“Why not use those stainless cooking appliances for a change before the foreclosure proceedings begin?”

Because they show fingerprints, and that might lower the value of the house and deter the FBs who might bail them out.

 
Comment by ex-nnvmtgbrkr
2007-03-29 08:50:38

“No, but I have seen the fat content walking in and out of Wal-Mart.”

Damn funny!

 
Comment by gwynster
2007-03-29 10:32:40

At Costco you can now buy “emergency food” in a 5 gallon white construction bucket for $100. I did the math and this would allow 1 person to live on 3 meals a day for a month. The DH calls this the “AMHM Special” (Adjustable Mortgage Happy Meal).

 
Comment by housing_apocalypse_now
2007-03-29 10:42:56

I’m guessing that bucket o’ food would last the typical American a week.

 
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2007-03-29 10:44:38

I actually thought these buckets were a great idea for disaster preparedness. But they suck for California. If we have a major disaster it will be an earthquake. In an earthquake water will be scarcer than food. These meals all need water to prepare. Oh well.

I didn’t think about “FB Surviver Rations.” One more reason to be glad we didn’t buy during the height of the mania. Can you imagine living on dehydrated food because all your money goes to paying off the people who own your debt and thus you? :D

 
Comment by gwynster
2007-03-29 12:10:41

Here in Sacramento, we worry about too much water >; )

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2007-03-29 16:26:51

http://www.preparedness.com/mohodifopa90.html

I’m actually thinking about investing in freeze-dried food companies, after doing the unthinkable and ordering a 90-day supply in case of a rainy day. Could be the next big thing. Does anyone have any good candidates?

 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2007-03-29 06:47:17

GAWD DAMN……….I wish I was making $2800 a month today…..i would be thanking the Bush Economy for all that money…..i could live again, pay my bills on time …Buy new clothes ….

And he’s 65….i guess age has nothing to do with being a MORON!

Comment by krazy_canuck
2007-03-29 07:23:10

a lot of people in S. cal make that kind of money each week and they still can’t afford to buy a decent house. hmmm - maybe affordability is an issue??

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by waiting_in_la
2007-03-29 16:47:21

I make $2200 a week base, $2400-$3000 with overtime. I cannot afford a home here by traditional standards.

…this is insane!

 
 
 
 
Comment by crash1
2007-03-29 05:31:03

Circuit City plans to fire up to 3400 high paid (?) sales people and replace them with lower paid replacements. Could sales be slowing everywhere? Starting to see slowing at the core.

Comment by Polestar
2007-03-29 06:32:30

Talked to a semi retired mason who works with a roofing company specializing in high end existing homes in western suburbs of Boston (like Wellesley). They normally do 6 to 8 million dollars per year. As of the end of this quarter they have done only half a million and the owner only has 3 people working for him now.

Probably a mix of rich people deferring work or looking for lower quotes, and overall business decline. Either way that’s a huge drop.

Comment by Tulkinghorn
2007-03-29 06:52:47

There are only so many slate roofs, even in Wellesley. Most of them have been rehabbed in the last 10 years, and will not need much work for the next 50.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Polestar
2007-03-29 09:41:12

Not according to him, I asked. Plenty of houses in wellesley, weston, brookline and others. This company has been in business for almost 40 years. They feel it is the economy. Not good.

 
Comment by not a gator
2007-03-29 10:23:42

He’s waiting for a storm, preferably “the big one.” Who knows, maybe this year’s hurricane season will oblige.

 
 
 
Comment by Warm Climes 4us
2007-03-29 06:50:09

I have a brother in the midwest that owns a quickstop type gas and food shop. He told me yesterday that he has noticed that customers have shifted from cash to almost total credit card purchases with sales slipping sharply as if something is changing in the economy. There is pain ahead.

Comment by Isoldearly
2007-03-29 07:15:08

Same Northern CA - even morning coffee at the java shack is put on credit cards according to owners report; grocery deli fixes good value sandwiches for local area workers lunch and those are 90% paid for by credit cards. Wonder what the cc late payment stats look like. Anybody know?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ajh
2007-03-29 07:29:21

I know several people who are putting even the most minor purchases on their credit cards to collect from reward programmes. They are paying the bill in full every month by automatic transfer from their savings accounts.

I would, however, NOT consider them typical.

 
Comment by vannuysrenter
2007-03-29 07:36:28

I have noticed an upswing in panhandlers at or around gas stations. And it’s not the hormal homeless looking crowd eather. People drive up in newer cars, dressed clean, look normal, but are begging for a couple of bucks in gas.

 
Comment by JP
2007-03-29 08:08:23

I think all of the CC stories should be tempered by changes in technology. There are people (like me) who will put everything they can on a CC so that I can

1. download it into quicken and track the spend, and
2. collect 1-10% back on my purchase.

Balance is autopaid every month (ie, I’m a deadbeat in CC parlance) but it provides me with lots of knowledge about where our money is going.

 
Comment by tangouniform
2007-03-29 09:51:06

I’m another one use uses his CC for 90% of purchases. I have to pay it off every month…it’s an AMEX card. Since a make a good number of reimbursable charges I like letting AMEX cover the float between charge and reimbursment.

 
Comment by MMG
2007-03-29 14:23:29

what’s funny is seeing a good looking girl in Irvine which is a nice area asking for some money for food. her significant other was standing nearby, also looked like a decsent guy looked worried, I kept thinking—–is this just a couple who is trying to make a couple of bucks the easy way or are they really in trouble that they dont have any extra money. the second thought was scary!!!

 
Comment by easthawaii
2007-03-29 15:02:38

Begging gas money happened to me in Houston recently too.

 
 
Comment by lurker
2007-03-29 07:43:09

It could be debit cards also. About 95% of all my purchases are by debit card, even the quick-stop cup of coffee. I am truly living in the electronic commerce world. I was going to a concert this past year and forgot to bring cash for parking, DOH.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sigalarm
2007-03-29 07:48:14

I did this for a while, and noticed I spent a lot more doing it this way. I found having the physical currency and handing it over helped me really consider purchases more, and recognize how much I was spending.

 
Comment by lurker
2007-03-29 08:17:53

Actually it’s the opposite for my family. Since 95% of my money spent is by debit card transactions, I know exactly where I spend my money each month. I simply download all my DC transactions from my bank website into Quicken. I have categories set up to see exactly how much I spent on any given month.

When I did the cash only thing, I could never remember where the money went, I just knew it was spent on something.

 
Comment by implosion
2007-03-29 09:22:54

Probably habit. I put everything in Quicken and pretty much use only cash, even for rent. I’ve been doing it since 1990. There’s something about knowing exactly where you spend your money, and paying with cash makes it real. Analyze the data at the end of every year, and figure out what’s going to change for the next year.

 
Comment by not a gator
2007-03-29 10:35:23

I’m with lurker–cash burns a hole in my pocket. I was only really able to control cash once, when I was in grad school. I’m not totally happy with my current system, but what I do is use a credit card and track my purchases online, making sure I don’t go over my monthly allowance.

Everything I earn over my allowance goes straight into interest-bearing savings acct. During the year, I look for investments to shift my savings into, keeping a three month cash cushion.

The nice thing about CC is that it takes away the anxiety of overdraft fees, too. I always kept about $800 extra in my checking when I had an ATM card, which was both a liability of sorts and an economic cost.

I have offered to pay for large purchases with debit or cash, though, because it is cheaper for the merchant.

 
Comment by gwynster
2007-03-29 10:37:52

I’ve been using debit cards exclusively for about 7 yrs. I love them. I may switch to using a CC with a cash back. I have no problem with paying it off each month.

 
Comment by ahansen
2007-03-29 11:39:19

Did all you CC and DC folks ever consider that EVERYTHING you purchase, everywhere you do so, at what hour of the day, and how much you paid is recorded electronically for anyone who wants to know? Very scary.

 
Comment by glorgau
2007-03-29 15:28:44

Cash is anonymous. I get enough junk mail and unsolicited phone calls as it is. To the majority of people in the world, I want to be invisible.

 
 
 
 
Comment by sigalarm
2007-03-29 06:42:50

Consider this a small story from the trenches. About 18 months ago I left a fairly secure job at a big defense contractor to start my own company. The notion was that we could bring to market some new technology and in the process probably have some fun and make enough money to keep us happily employed.

Things have been going reasonably well, we have had some good successes. Since the first of the year, new business and repeat business has been getting harder to come by. Now this may be due to the fact that we are the new guys and we might not be addressing the market correctly. Most of our customers are talking about cut backs inside their own organization, so I think they are hurting for money.

I think we will be ok for a bit longer, as we have resisted the temptation to spend much the money we have made over the last 18 months on new employees or infrastructure upgrades, so we have some cushion to work from. But the bigger guys are tightening up now, at least all of the financial guys, which is where we had most of our early success.

Comment by scdave
2007-03-29 08:36:58

Sig;….What part of the country are you in ??

 
Comment by sigalarm
2007-03-29 09:44:10

San Diego, but our customers have been financial biz in the DC / Baltimore area, some hospitality and gaming companies in Vegas, a few consumer banking and finance types that have offices all over the country. The slow down is pretty broad for us at the moment. We are getting some good interest in the trasportation sector now, and they seem to have funds for IT improvements. We are also getting some interest from additional sectors of the US and UK Governments.

 
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2007-03-29 10:40:29

Sigalarm - The economy is definitely slowing down and your business is feeling it. (As is mine and several others I know of.)

I know there is a formula to measure the affect of increased money supply. Does anyone know how to calculate the opposite? I.e. if people’s spending ability is cut 10% on average because a.) they no longer can HELOC “free” money b.) the easy loans are no longer available and c.) highly paid employees are replaced by cheaper labor (Circuit City) how does this affect the overall economy? Is it a 10% decline or far worse?

 
 
Comment by AZgolfer
2007-03-29 08:20:56

I was in Macy’s last night at the Lancome counter. Totally dead. The sales girl was trying to sell me anything she could think of.

Comment by ex-nnvmtgbrkr
2007-03-29 08:55:26

Really? Which Macy’s was that again?

 
 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-29 05:02:26

Nobody ever expects the subprime inquisition…

Comment by jmf
2007-03-29 05:12:19

the good old monty python…. :-)

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-29 05:18:01

Not bragging or anything…

About a dozen of us went and saw a director’s cut of the Grail, in Santa Monica, some 10 years ago or so~

There was an additional 17 seconds, somewhere in it.

 
Comment by Brooklynite
2007-03-29 05:19:06

What, no link to immobilienblasen?

Haven’t had access to the tubes in a few days. Serious withdrawal here. I see from the NYT though, that the collapse continues apace.

 
Comment by jmf
2007-03-29 05:20:55
 
 
Comment by Mikey(2)
2007-03-29 05:42:51

“Nobody expects the housing implosition.”

 
Comment by Waiting for the Fall
2007-03-29 06:29:04

It’s only a flesh wound.

Comment by jschurchin
2007-03-29 07:01:42

Bwahaha!!! I’ll bite you to death!!!

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-29 09:42:37

The world today seems absolutely crackers

With housing bombs to blow us all sky high (down)

Their are fools and idiots like us with a big of a snigger

It’s depressing, and it’s senseless and that’s why…

I like Chinese

I like Chinese

They

Pretty much can do as they please

Hopefully we’ll soon not be at their knees

I like Chinese

I like Chinese

There’s 900 Million (old ditty) of them in the world today

You’d better learn to like them, that’s what I say.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by NoVa RE Supernova
2007-03-29 05:04:03

German regulator warns of hedge-fund crisis.

In an interview with Welt am Sonntag, printed March 18, Jochen Sanio, who heads Germany’s financial market regulatory agency BaFin, warned that hedge-fund collapses could blow the entire system apart. He said the Amaranth collapse last September, was a “clear warning signal, strong lightning in the distance. In the next case that size, the lightning could strike and shake up the financial system.” Sanio also said he is worried about the U.S. mortgage market. “I can only hope that we are not now at the beginning of a collapse in the U.S. housing market, which through the U.S. conjuncture would affect the global conjuncture. . . . That would be the last thing we would need.”

Sanio endorsed the German initiative for an international discussion
about hedge funds, the discussion as such would be valuable, because “from now on, the issue can no longer be played down. . . . The highly speculative hedge funds pose a great danger to the stability of the financial system.”

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 05:17:59

“I can only hope that we are not now at the beginning of a collapse in the U.S. housing market”

Where’s this guy been, under a rock? The collapse is well under way, it’s just that the major pain is a little ways off.

These regulatory folks are completely delusional. The “global economy” is a disastrous financial and social experiment. Each country should be cleaning its own house and forgetting about international financial summits.

Yeah, I got your global economy. Right here.

Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-29 05:31:51

Good morning Palmetto. You must have peeked out the window and become depressed. I’m just fixing to venture forth in Hyde Park, and trembling with anticipation.

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 05:38:11

Hi, Incredulous, in case you didn’t see it, I replied to your post yesterday. Good thoughts. I think more of us ought to be up front about how we feel, even if it means offending friends, family and neighbors.

What’s happening in Hyde Park these days? I’m sort of hunkered down here in SouthShore. I don’t get depressed, though, I get angry when I peek out the window. I have to take some deep breaths before I drive, because it is not good to have an angry person behind the wheel of a car.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-29 07:12:27

Hi Palmetto,

Well, Hyde Park is . . . uh, still pretending to be Beverly Hills. Fortunately, almost nobody here feeds their pets ordinary commercial pet food, so there haven’t been as many poisonings here as other places. My vet has had two or three cases. Of course, some of the offenders were Iams and Eukanuba, and another even more expensive brand, so big companies are still deceiving the masses (putting their labels on crap and selling it at premium prices).

Lots of “for sale” signs, especially on the north side of Swann, and there is an tacky development of townhouses called “The Brownstones of Soho” behind the Sweetbay grocery store that looks virtually empty. They start at 400k, but I understand only three have sold since last summer, and all apparently to flippers hoping to get rich. One bought one, put in a big screen television, and immediately put it on the market for a million. The architects goofed, and put the rows of townhouses too close together, so residents can’t get their cars in between and into their tiny garages without multiple starts and stops and maneuvers, and heaven help them if somebody else is trying to get in or out. I see bicycles piled up, and I suppose the places will become section eight housing for poor people who don’t own cars. Down the street from me, a punch of townhouses that started at 600k a couple years ago are for sale, again. The flippers (I think realtors) keep taking down the “for sale” signs, waiting a few weeks, then putting them back up. Meanwhile, half the stores in Hyde Park Village have gone belly-up, but the new owners are remodeling, and putting in a bunch of new condos, presumably anticipating an influx of rich New Yorkers. I remember when the most expensive townhouses there were going for 160k. Everywhere, speculators have built junk for which they’re asking California coastline prices (into the millions), even for places built next to the Crosstown Expressway, and in really trashy neighborhoods. There are no foreclosures listed for this zip code on foreclosure.com.

I get depressed from the traffic and crowds, but the city of Tampa has actively worked to get people to move here. They used to promote this dump as “America’s next great city,” and evidenly believed their own PR, and the locals really think this is a major metropolitan area up there with Paris, London, and New York. It is simply astounding. Can’t they look out THEIR windows and see how horrible and primitive Tampa really is?

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2007-03-29 07:20:24

NO NO NO the architects didnt goof…they ASSUMED you wouldnt have any money left over after the mortgae for anything bigger then a Geo or Ford Escort!….

Somehow my Landlord manages to get his KaddyLack between the two houses… but i’ve seen some new row houses you can stretch your ams and litteraly touch both houses, with a garage in back.

The architects goofed, and put the rows of townhouses too close together, so residents can’t get their cars in between and into their tiny garages without multiple starts and stops and maneuvers,

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 07:20:58

“Can’t they look out THEIR windows and see how horrible and primitive Tampa really is?”

No, they can’t, Incredulous. Tampa should just concentrate on being what it is or was, a sort of halfway charming sleepy little Southern port city with some interesting architecture and a laid back atmosphere. Not some unsuccessful Cali/NY hybrid wannabe.

I hope Hillsborough goes for light rail, though. That might help.

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-29 07:28:28

I don’t think a GEO or Ford Escort would fit. Maybe a very small golf cart. I haven’t see a single car actually accomplish the feat of getting between the rows (where the garages are). The builder would have to knock down the entire front row of townhouses to give owners real access, and this would mean an imaginary loss of millions of dollars. These places are so tiny, each floor is the size a single-car garage, and there are three or four floors per unit.

The builder wants to add even more of these horrors across the parking lot of the grocery store behind them, and has bought the property. Of course, everybody wants to spend a million dollars to live on the Sweetbay supermarket parking lot.

 
Comment by Paul
2007-03-29 07:53:34

Incredulous,

I used to Iams, ’til one day I opened a can and it was very watery, not solid like it had been. So I started looking at ingredients, nad found that the “healthy” stuff was basically the same at the cheap stuff. So my cat gets the cheap stuff.

She hasn’t mentioned any problems so far…

Paul

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-29 08:20:27

Hi Paul,

My cats get “Wellness” dry food (20 bucks for a small bag), which is allegedly human grade quality. They love it, grew up on it, and look beautiful. They also have the energy of kittens. I’m careful to stick with the chicken, because salmon, like tuna, can cause problems in cats (I speak from experience), though, on occasiona, I’ll get them a tiny bag of the salmon “Wellness” for a treat.

The ingredients in most commercial cats foods are horrific.

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-29 08:26:55

Palmetto, Tampa was always awful. When I moved here as a kid, I remember crying because I was so horrified. At least back then, it was quiet, and one could go to Ybor City and get deviled crabs from street vendors (now I don’t eat them, because my conscience won’t allow me to eat something cooked alive), and real estate was cheap, and the bays were clean (you could see to the bottom), and there was NO traffic, not even on Dale Mabry. We used to ride our bikes across Gandy Bridge in complete safety. And downtown St. Pete was a real treat.

Actually, that part is still true, so that’s where I hope to move at some point. I want a real loft in a real old building, with incredibly high ceilings, and NO neighbors.

 
Comment by WAman
2007-03-29 08:50:42

You spend $20 for a small bag of cat food? What century is this? Have I been asleep for too long?

 
Comment by Mystry62
2007-03-29 08:51:38

“Tampa should just concentrate on being what it is or was, a sort of halfway charming sleepy little Southern port city with some interesting architecture and a laid back atmosphere. Not some unsuccessful Cali/NY hybrid wannabe.”

I’ll agree with that. For some reason, people here think that they are entitled to major cash just b/c their house is in Hillsborough County.

I know a couple who bought a 3/2 1000 sf cracker box track house in Brandon for $179K in Nov 05. When the house was listed, it was listed for $172K and this couple got into a bidding war with another buyer. They are now trying to sell the house for more than they paid b/c their ARM is due to reset soon and they want to “pay off some bills”. They are delusional that they will get anything more than 140K for that house, if they’re lucky. Even the over-inflated Property Appraiser’s estimate is $138K.

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-29 08:58:09

Hi WAman, yes I do, though “small” means about 5 lbs. It’s one of the more expensive pet foods, but I’ve seen some twice that high, and prescription foods are also generally expensive. I won’t let my animals have any pet food from the grocery store, because it’s just too disgusting.

 
Comment by ex-nnvmtgbrkr
2007-03-29 09:01:36

“You spend $20 for a small bag of cat food? What century is this? Have I been asleep for too long?”

Hey, I spent $1000 for a cat. A CAT!! What a dickhead I am.

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-03-29 09:41:43

We tried to get a law passed that would allow year round shooting of cats. Got on the national news and the pet lovers put a stop to it. I still shoot any cats I see. Cats are a destructive nuisance.

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-29 09:48:29

Shoot my cats, I shoot you. Cats the major reason why we don’t have outbreaks of Bubonic plague and Hanta virus; they are among the most import creatures in our ecosystem. Your comments aren’t funny. Why not get a law passed to shoot children? I bet that would get more laughs.

 
Comment by ex-nnvmtgbrkr
2007-03-29 09:53:21

You want a nuisance, try owning a dog. Needy, whining, dirty, attention-starved, crap everywhere and then roll in the crap, leg-humping, salivating hand lickers, bark all night long at absolutely nothing. If I want that kind of trouble I’ll have a kid instead. I say no thanks to both!

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-29 10:12:24

I love dogs. No trouble at all. And incredibly loyal.

 
Comment by housing_apocalypse_now
2007-03-29 10:46:06

Keep all the cats and the dogs. Shoot the children.

 
Comment by gwynster
2007-03-29 10:48:53

OMG ex-nv that was priceless! Although I read it as “You want a nuisance, try having a boyfriend” Thank god I found a sane one and married him on the spot. Now I also have 3 Maine Coons which lb. for lb. is like having a large dog.

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-03-29 10:56:40

WILDLIFE ENEMY NUMBER ONE

“Wisconsin residents support a plan to legalize wild cat hunting, according to voting results released Tuesday.

At meetings across the state Monday night, residents in 72 counties were asked whether free-roaming cats should be listed as an unprotected species. If so listed, the cats — including any domestic cat that isn’t under the owner’s direct control or any cat without a collar — could be hunted.

A total of 6,830 voted yes and 5,201 voted no, according to results released by the Department of Natural Resources.”
and

“Although the position varies from state to state, the “house cat” is a “non-game mammal” to be killed if “unduly predatory” and the “wild house cat” is an unprotected animal to be shot with impunity.”

and from California
“Ron Jurek, a wildlife biologist for the California Department of Fish and Game, has kept a close eye on the impact feral and free-roaming domestic cats have on native species, like the California least tern, a federal endangered bird that nests along the coast.

“Cats do kill wildlife to a significant degree, which is not a popular notion with a lot of people,” he said.

So don’t give me the Cats are good BS - they cause far more problems than rodents.

Maybe where you live cats aren’t a problem, but when they become a problem… the problem is out of control. It wasn’t meant to be funny, Cats are the single largest predator of small birds and animals. And unfortunately most cat owners let their cats roam and an incredible number of morons get tired of their cat and release the cat in the “wilderness” aka my farm.

Cats cause

 
Comment by gwynster
2007-03-29 11:07:28

Here in Davis, CA we have wild domesticated turkeys. I kid you not. They flock around the Nugget off Covell and the surrounding neighborhoods. They are escapees from a ranch here years ago and have been living in the green spaces between Woodland and Davis. There is nothing like driving to your house and noticing the neighbors yard is covered in dinner.

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-29 11:36:21

Remind me to stay out of Wisconsin, land of cheese and nothing else, except for fat, cheesy people. As for cats killing birds, blame Mother Nature. This is part of the natural balance that HUMANS have tried to alter. Cats are not vicious or dangerous; they’re cats, and attributing human vices to them is hilarious. Ten-to-one, the people behind these initiatives are hunters, looking for something else to shoot, or superstitious religious fanatics, who probably also think bats are evil. There is no species as destructive as the human one, and the fact that humans voted for such a stupid law just reinforces this fact. Here in Hillsborough County, the locals voted to allow Animal Control to sell homeless dogs and cats to the USF medical school for so called medical research. What a bunch of slobs. The fools who pushed this law had fat asses on television saying, “If experimenting [a.k.a. torturing and killing] all these cats and dogs can save me or my kids from cancer, then hell yes, I’m for it!” It never entered their minute brains that putting down the Twinkies and Big Gulps, and getting off the sofa might have far more beneficial effects, but, then, why should they sacrifice for themselves when they can find scapegoats to do it for them? Of course, not a single medical discovery has been made by the quacks at USF who claimed the law was so vital to human progress. I say, if people want to experiment, let them experiment on themselves, and instead of shooting wild cats, let them shoot each other. Not one of these horrors is worth a single hair on my cats, and if I ever caught someone trying to shoot my cats as nuissances, I’d shoot the bastard without blinking, and proudly go to trial.

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-03-29 12:24:56

“This is part of the natural balance that HUMANS have tried to alter. ” BS

Get your facts straight! Cats are not a native species in the US and have no business being let outside. Do you let your cats outside - then in Florida you may be violating state laws.
From the Florida Fish and Wildlife
http://myfwc.com/cats/
and a 33 pg pdf file on the impact of cats on Florida wildlife.
http://tinyurl.com/2slowp

So don’t blame hunters - cats are the problem!

It seems that Wisconsin residents understand and discuss the problem while Florida residents to the dismay of The Florida Fish and Wildlife Service ignore it. Florida is welcome to all the wild cats in Wisconsin.

 
Comment by Big V
2007-03-29 12:35:33

Hoz:

The solution to your cat overpopulation problem is two-fold:

1. Your city needs to engage in a feral cat spay/neuter program.

2. Your city needs to discourage people from feeding feral cats without having them spayed/neutered.

Shooting the little buggers is not OK. And it’s true that they are an important part of any high-density or agrarian human society. That’s why the Egyptians confered upon them a god-like status. Without cats, ALL of our wheat would be tainted with rat poison, and the diseases carried by rodents would be out of control.

As far as cats hunting small wildlife, that’s just natural. If wild animals have no predators, then their populations get out of control. In the case of the domestic cat, it is at the top of the food chain, so it needs no predator. The problem doesn’t lie in lack of predators, it lies in an overabundance of food (i.e., human food waste and bowls of food on the porch).

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-03-29 12:53:41

Cats are not natural in the US. So in an attempt to control a non native invasive species, Wisconsin restocked Coyotes. Cats are no different than rabbits or cane toads in Australia, brown snakes in Guam, Starlings in NY parks or any other gross destructive species.

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-29 13:10:42

Humans are not native to this continent, either, so why aren’t the rednecks of Wisconsin doing something to seriously control their population as well? What a strange argument. Just imagine the harm you do to Wisconsin every time you eat pineapple. Cattle are not native to Great Britain, horses are not native to South America, and heaven knows cheese is hardly something Nature intended. Every time you drink milk you’re violating Natural Law, since milk is only intended for babies, and cow milk is only intended for calves.

Without cats, we’d all be dead from diseases they keep in check. Several places have tried to wipe out cats before, with terrible results. In the Middle Ages, religious loons killed them in huge numbers because they thought they were demonic, and Bubonic Plague was the result. This has happened time and again, but I guess the good Lutherans of Wisconsin think they’re somehow different, better, or more divinely in tune, and know better than Nature itself. As usual. The housing bubble is only one piece of a Stupidity Bubble that dwarfs all progress by comparison.

 
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2007-03-29 13:40:32

“Shoot my cats, I shoot you.”

Just when I begin to become suicidally depressed I find hope! :D

Cats are not the problem. Yes, feral kitties need to be controlled with spaying and neutering, but as usual, and the one thing this blog is really about, it’s the stupid people who don’t take responsibility for their actions that cause the problems. Morons who dump unwanted pets in the country instead of taking them into a shelter, or get a kitten and ignore the grown cat until it runs away for survival purposes.

 
Comment by moderator
2007-03-29 13:48:29

Quit ripping on Wisconsin. The state capital has a housing bubble going on that put’s the rest of the Midwest to shame.

http://madisonhousingbubble.blogspot.com/

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-29 15:23:00

Cheese has that effect.

 
Comment by spike66
2007-03-29 18:00:53

If you’re so desperate to shoot something, shoot FBs. They’re a drag on the country, and there’s too many of them underfoot already.
Cats are essential to keep rat population in check. With 300 million humans, the pristine balance of nature is already out of whack. Cats are the only effective rat deterrent.
Don’t like dogs? Well, as long as you never lose a child, or lose your eyesight, or get caught in a natural disaster, it probably doesn’t matter. If any of the above does happen to you or your family, I do hope there are no dogs available to help you. NYPD relies on dogs for drug sniffing and of course bomb sniffing…but you would never need that kind of help, would you?

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-29 18:55:04

Mother Nature has many clients

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-03-29 19:37:02

I am absolutely stunned at the cognitive dissonance expressed by the cat lovers. I have presented sound scientific facts with sources showing that cats are a great hazard. I have documented the cost to society from cats. And the only fall back is cats “control diseases”, and comparing an invasive pest to humans. Humans are not native to this continent nor are horses or pigs (cows are native to this continent and freely interbreed with buffalo) . This is as fallacious as “real estate always goes up”. Where are your sources? Why do you make blanket generalizations not supported by any recognized scientists? And then your manifest ignorance regarding Cats as effective rat killers shows that you have never researched the cats effectiveness and are relying on the same pablum as the realtors spill out.

Loving cats is fine, refusing to believe there is a cat problem when shown facts about the problem is stupidity at best.

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-03-29 20:48:04

“The Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus, also called the brown rat or sewer rat) is a destructive pest found in urban and suburban neighborhoods.
…Control by Cats and Dogs. Many rat problems around homes can be related to the keeping of pets. In fact, rats may live in very close association with cats and dogs. Rats frequently live beneath a doghouse and soon learn they can feed on the dog’s food when he is absent or asleep. Although house cats, some dogs and other predators kill rats, they do not usually provide effective rat control.” (did you notice that rats aren’t a problem on farms?)

from Vermont’s website
“Feral cats are extremely efficient at preying on small birds and mammals. The general public typically only sees cats as a way of removing pest species and as pets, but they are also direct competitors with declining raptor populations and destructive to native species. In a study by George (1974), he asked 49 wildlife protective agencies about the distribution and density of cats in the U.S. None had any data on cat numbers. In 1916 Forbush wrote extensively about the great harm done by farm cats and feral cats to bird populations. There is lack of knowledge of cats and an understanding about their effects as an introduced species. Laboratory studies have suggested that hunger and hunting in cats are controlled by separate parts of the brain. Even though humans may feed cats, cats still have an instinct to hunt. Bradt reported that a cat that consumed domestic food killed 1,600 mammals and 60 birds in an 18-month period.

“In Connecticut alone, cats are the third largest carriers of rabies. Nation wide, they are the domestic animal most frequently reported to have rabies. They may transmit the human disease toxoplasmosis. Fleas and well as tapeworms may present problems. Cat-scratch fever is a danger. They have spread feline leukemia virus to mountain lions and feline panleucopaenia (feline distemper)(Van Rensburg et al. 1987) to the Florida panther (Coleman et al.1996).”

From Florida’s website:
“Cats compete with native predators and spread disease.”
So much for cats stopping diseases.
From The Illinois Prevention and Control
Rat Fact Sheet
http://tinyurl.com/3e5zws

In summary your ignorance is boring: you perpetuate myths and have no regard for facts alien to your parochial beluiefs.

 
Comment by creamofthecrap
2007-03-29 22:47:07

Solution for feral cat problem: don’t hunt ‘em, trap ‘em. Fill up a bunch of vacant McMansions with the kitties, and let them feast on the rotting corpses of FBs who are about to knock themselves off. Throw in some realtors, mortgage fraudsters, and other members of the RE-industrial-complex, and those felines are guaranteed to stay fat for a long while.

Heh heh… look at the 2nd definition of “suicide”. Did someone from Ben’s blog edit the dictionary?
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/suicide

 
 
 
 
Comment by John Fleming
2007-03-29 05:21:33

So don’t you dare saying…’Ich habe es nicht gewusst’!

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 08:42:56

“Tampa was always awful.”

Geez, Incredulous, I dunno what to say about that. Because your post goes on to describe something that once was pretty nice, at least it sounds idyllic to me.

I thought I died and went to heaven when I moved to this area from South Florida.

Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-29 09:33:12

Palmetto,

Really? Heaven? I guess it depends on what you’re used to or wish you were used to. I always hated Miami, but Naples used to be gorgeous. So was Key West before rich gay New Yorkers took it over and made it, ugh, chic. I’d still move there if the prices came back to Earth.

Tampa used to be so backward, there was only one nice restaurant (I use the word ‘nice’ sarcastically), Berns’ Steak House (as in, “Honey, did we come into an Armenian brothel by accident?”) other than Las Novadadas (sp?) in Ybor City. Some of the worst movies in history were filmed–and premiered–here including “Jump,” and ‘The Viking” (or some such, with Lee Majors). We used to scream with laughter at Tampa pretending to be something, but now we just scream. At some point in the 1980s people started believing their own malarkey.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2007-03-29 05:24:02

Yeah right. They love it until risk rears its ugly head. Then it’s paper the file, CYA time so you can be on record as being “concerned” before it happens.

Next.

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 05:30:48

Exactly, txchick.

 
 
 
Comment by jmf
2007-03-29 05:08:46

Kass: Harley Hogs Feed at the Subprime Trough

the subprime mess is spreading…..

plus

a weird housing picture/story from china :-)

http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/

Comment by Brooklynite
2007-03-29 05:19:37

D’oh!

 
Comment by txchick57
2007-03-29 05:24:41

You’re late. That was put on here yesterday.

Comment by jmf
2007-03-29 05:50:39

i apologize for not getting every link/story posted here…….

Comment by renterbychoice
2007-03-29 10:31:17

well played

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Lou Minatti
2007-03-29 05:16:48

I was thinking about this last night. When we refinanced in February 2003, the lending standards were still fairly rational, at least in Houston. We had to provide W2s, tax records, bank statements. They verified our employment.

Sometime after early 2003 the standards changed. I’m curious to know when exactly that was.

Comment by luvs_footie
2007-03-29 05:19:34

Think it was 24 hrs after you refinanced.

Comment by MGNYC
2007-03-29 05:46:24

lol

 
 
Comment by dba
2007-03-29 05:28:36

around 2004 and 2005 when banks decided they needed a way to keep the mortgage business money flowing to generate fees

Comment by novasold
2007-03-29 06:00:03

In Northern Virginia it started in 2002. My next door neighbor got a loan at to buy the house and he didn’t have a green card or verifiable income.

What a disaster that was!

 
 
Comment by sf jack
2007-03-29 07:51:23

“Sometime after early 2003 the standards changed. I’m curious to know when exactly that was.”

*********

Greenspan gave a speech in which he said “ARMs are OK” on February 24, 2004, if I recall.

 
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2007-03-29 07:58:34

Actually back in 2000 some lenders were doing some of that already.

We bought without W-2’s or tax returns (coming from overseas, I didn’t have any), and I didn’t even give them old paystubs from the previuous job. We did have bank statements, and verification of the (brand new) job once I finally got my first pay stub there. Hmmm… Alt-A anybody? An old-fashioned 20% down payment no doubt helped grease the wheels, of course, and we even got a typical market interest rate. Same thing for a friend of mine buying six months later in a similar situation - no sweat with a “low-doc” mortgage.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2007-03-29 08:39:07

I think the market in Ca. reached it’s max in mid 2002 and it should of contracted at that point based on max. affordability .
Prior to 2002 I think it was more of a owner-user market that had reached its max based on pent up demand for a number of years .After 2002 everything went haywire as far as I’m concerned and now it could drive prices below 2002 levels . One could get a foreclosure or auction or maybe a builder sell out for below 2002 prices in the future I think .

 
Comment by WAman
2007-03-29 09:18:35

Over ten years ago (1995) my wife and I moved from the philly burbs to the mountains of Colorado and we bought a house with no jobs, but we did have 20% down on a 200k house and 10k in the bank after that. It was not a subprime loan either.

 
 
 
Comment by Sic Semper Realtor
2007-03-29 05:20:40

Stucco - your cargo cult was on CNBC this morning. Wow. Either these guys are heavily invested in gold (read:they want inflation) or they are so convinced that their STATIC analysis is so bulletproof that nobody will change their behavior with free money again. They byline was “Rate cut will save us all”. These guys really need to get the crap sued out of them for all of their pump and dump schemes (again). OTOH, I think HeliBen is (for whatever reason) doing a reasonable job of resisting the urge to cut when all of these blowhards are asking for it several times a day. Now, if only he would raise to give them the “high hard one”….

Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-29 06:44:36

The pages of the WSJ are laying the blame for yesterday’s stock market decline on BB. Sheesh — all the guy did was basically say “no, our failure to raise or lower rates last week did not signal that future rate cuts are in the bag…”

Comment by tweedle-dee (not dumb)
2007-03-29 07:22:05

I cannot believe how Wall Street expects the Fed to cut. Inflation is CLEARLY NOT under control. And I think that Ben has the guts and determination to keep it under control. And with output falling and corn and gasoline prices rising, I think he has a rate HIKE or two planned.

I think Ben is much, much better than Greenspan.

Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-03-29 07:32:00

The jury is still out. I wouldn’t be surprised if he maintains the status quo, however. That alone would increase his and the fed’s credibility. In addition to WS pressure, however, there is going to be mounting political pressure in the near future to lower rates. The handwringing is in full swing and poor Ben he is caught between a falling dollar and hard rate…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by KIA
2007-03-29 07:56:24

The best course to me seems to stand pat again, but I really don’t know whether Bernake has the fortitude to stand firm. Neither alternative leads to a good result. Lowering rates will kill the dollar and trade balances and may precipitate investor flight. Raising the rates will finish off the ARM borrowers and increase the costs of borrowing and debt service. We’ll see, of course.

 
Comment by Waiting for the Fall
2007-03-29 07:56:44

The pundits are beginning to blame inflationary pressures chiefly on the rent market. What are the odds that BB will consider eliminating housing from the core data? They’ve already thrown out food and energy, why not something equally meaningless to survival, like shelter?

“Might does not make right, but it sure makes what is.”- Edward Abbey

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-29 10:08:06

“…equally meaningless to survival, like shelter?”

Last time I checked (which was many years ago — early 1990s), the shelter component of the expenditure basket used to compute the CPI was something like 27%. Of course, with all the high risk lending going on (including stated income loans where the payment actually exceeds the borrower’s income), that 27% might be a severe underestimate.

 
 
Comment by Hoz
2007-03-29 08:32:26

It is quite possible that Mr. Bernanke wishes to drive the US into a recession to get rid of the excess liquidity. I am no financial genius and have no access to the timely data that the Fed receives. As this board has repeatedly demonstrated the inadequacy of the Federal Reserve to forecast the future over the past 2 years, the Federal Reserve with its timely data must have an agenda that is not made public. The members of the Federal Reserve may lie and cheat and steal but they are not stupid. IMHO - targeted recession thru 2011.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Mike_in_Fl
2007-03-29 11:14:45

Speaking of inflation, here are some bullets to consider …
Crude oil futures are up almost $2 to $65.83 … the highest level since September.

The 10-year TIPS spread is up again to 246 basis points.

Long bonds have fallen in price for 10 out of the past 12 sessions.

Respondents polled by the Conference Board expect inflation to be running at a 4.9% rate 12 months from now. That’s up from 4.8% a year ago and the highest reading since October 2006.

Core CPI is still up 2.7% nine months after the Fed stopped hiking rates.

Some more thoughts on Bernanke’s approach to inflation and the recent data here, if you’re interested …

http://interestrateroundup.blogspot.com/2007/03/parsing-bernankes-comments.html

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-03-29 05:24:57

The WSJ chronicles New Century’s demise and the role of investment bankers this morining. The article provides a lot of unpublished insider details including timelines. A must read. Here’s the title and an excerpt from the article:

How Street Hit Lender
‘Subprime’ King New Century
Was Down but Not Quite Out;
Then, Banks Shut Cash Spigot
By GREGORY ZUCKERMAN
March 29, 2007; Page C1

The woes of New Century and others in the subprime industry aren’t necessarily bad news for Wall Street. Some firms are shopping for battered mortgage lenders’ bargain-priced assets.

“What we’re seeing [is] a good opportunity for us around the subprime space,” Lehman Brothers Chief Financial Officer Christopher O’Meara said March 14. Goldman and Bear Stearns executives also have expressed interest in finding subprime opportunities amid the wreckage.

Morgan Stanley, which had loaned $2.3 billion to such companies, says its subprime business was a “significant contributor” to robust first-quarter profits. The firm made some good trades betting that subprime woes would deepen, hedging their exposure to the market, and had collateral to back up money it loaned to now-struggling subprime companies, people familiar with the matter say. Even New Century’s expected bankruptcy filing presents an opportunity: Lazard Ltd. has been hired as a restructuring adviser to the company.

“Shed no tears for the titans of Wall Street,” Kathleen Shanley, an analyst at bond-research firm Gimme Credit, wrote in a report. Its title: “Never Bet Against the House.”

Comment by txchick57
2007-03-29 05:32:24

“What we’re seeing [is] a good opportunity for us around the subprime space,” Lehman Brothers Chief Financial Officer Christopher O’Meara said March 14. Goldman and Bear Stearns executives also have expressed interest in finding subprime opportunities amid the wreckage.”

Yep. As mentioned a few weeks ago, this stuff is too prime for these guys to give up this easily.

Comment by txchick57
2007-03-29 05:37:42

Here’s what I’d like to know. Conspiracy nut that I am, I think some of these guys like MS, Bear, hedge funds etc. are behind the trap door opening on the New Centurys and Lends of the world. Now, how rigorously have they modeled and hedged the ultimate risks. One guy here showed a nice basically low risk arbitrage that I think Farallon was doing in either Lend or New. Another guy who posted only once and was a hedge fund analyst/quant guy said they had modeled for defaults but maybe not the all of the fraud and total blowups of these companies. This is what’s interesting to me. I find it hard to believe that some of these very sophisticated investors are hanging out naked or with unhedged risk but maybe they are. Who knows

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-29 05:41:36

I see debt people

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mikey(2)
2007-03-29 06:26:03

I coulda been a conned-debtor.

 
Comment by sellnrun
2007-03-29 07:12:38

I am not so quick to give these pinheads credit for being above the fray. I think they create analysis which justifies their entry into an area where they see large profit opportunity. An asset mania like what we’ve had is more pervasive than just a consumer-wanting event.

Number-crunching morons with no real world common sense populate Wall Street and our universities.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 05:44:16

“I find it hard to believe that some of these very sophisticated investors are hanging out naked or with unhedged risk but maybe they are. Who knows”

Doesn’t surprise me.

But here’s my question. Just like salesmen are the easiest people to sell to, gamers can be gamed. Like in the movie “The Sting”. So, if someone or some group wished to hand the hedgies their ass, how would they go about doing that? Can the computers be hacked and accounts disappeared? What would you do if you wanted to wreak havoc on the hedgies or other financial gamers?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-03-29 06:10:46

Here are a couple possibilities:

1. As the article describes perhaps they were shocked and awed. Therefore, not fully hedged. As a result, they are going to absorb losses for bad loans. Add to that, future revenue losses as a result of New’s demise.

2. They shorted New on the way down and made some money as it crashed. I don’t know if that covers the bad loan losses, however. Nevertheless, they are going to lose future revenue from the second biggest originator in the industry. Incidentally, I read here yesterday that HSBC is getting out of the subpslime space.

 
Comment by jim A
2007-03-29 06:27:29

Of course hedging is rarely perfect. ISTR Fannie got into trouble post 9/11 because their hedging of interest rate risks just wasn’t designed to handle rates so low. That was when the becmae “Technicall Insolvent.”

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-03-29 05:54:36

Maybe the following excerpts will help a little with the hedge question. First, there is the conference call where New Century’s CEO Brad Morrice pleads for more time:

On a March 6 conference call, New Century Financial Corp. Chief Executive Brad Morrice seemed hopeful.

Increased defaults were hammering loans the company had made to less-creditworthy home buyers, and its lenders were preparing to declare it in default. But Mr. Morrice told bankers from Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and its nine other Wall Street lenders that he had a plan to secure new financing so he could keep his mortgage business going. He just needed a little time.

Hours later, the bankers began formally terminating lending agreements that had provided $8 billion to New Century — pushing the nation’s second-largest mortgage lender to risky “subprime” borrowers (behind HSBC Holdings PLC’s HSBC Finance Corp.) to the brink of bankruptcy.

Later in the article the investment banks express shock after what the heard during the call:

The bankers listened without indicating whether they’d help. In private meetings after hanging up, some expressed shock at New Century’s precarious state, given its depleted cash supply. “That told us the situation was more dire than we thought,” says a banker on the call.

That night, Citigroup moved forward with a decision to declare New Century in default. Others followed. The next day, Mr. Einhorn resigned from New Century’s board. Though Morgan Stanley agreed to a $265 million loan, it demanded as collateral a loan portfolio worth even more, and reversed course a few days later and cut off additional financing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 06:12:30

Cue the ragtime piano theme from “The Sting”. LOL!

Dadadadadadadada dadadadeedlydedadada…

 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-03-29 07:01:56

Keep in mind, like HSBC, these guys have other revenue sources. Nevertheless, apart from potential loan losses and future revenue losses, other bottom line threats may originate from the political and legal arena. In the current unfavorable sociopolitical mudslinging subslime environment, it’s possible we may see a FB class action lawsuit OR even some type of governmental sanction.

 
 
Comment by droog
2007-03-29 07:32:11

I work in IT at one of the “house players” and everyone in management seemed shocked/suprised that subprime blew up the way it did. We are only now putting safeguards in place to guard against some of the riskier loan repurchases.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-03-29 08:02:58

Stunning!

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-29 09:28:36

“blow’d up good, It blow’d up real good”

Big Jim McBob & Billy Sol Hurok

From the place that brought you Al Peck’s Used Fruit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_City_Television

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-29 10:30:37

“…everyone in management seemed shocked/suprised that subprime blew up the way it did.”

Recommend this book to your management:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fooled_by_Randomness

 
Comment by droog
2007-03-29 11:08:54

I actually have that book sitting on my desk at work! It’s an excellent book. Unfortunately, the book everyone is reading is called “Fooled by Stated Income Borrowers”.

 
 
Comment by droog
2007-03-29 07:32:12

I work in IT at one of the “house players” and everyone in management seemed shocked/suprised that subprime blew up the way it did. We are only now putting safeguards in place to guard against some of the riskier loan purchases.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by johnfromia
2007-03-29 07:55:50

“This is what’s interesting to me. I find it hard to believe that some of these very sophisticated investors are hanging out naked or with unhedged risk but maybe they are. Who knows”

I recently read “Traders, Guns, & Money” by Satyajit Das, who was a bigwig in the derivatives biz and has now written this tell all. Any thoughts I had about how these “sophisticated investors” with their fool proof models were well-hedged evaporated in reading that book. What it comes down to for me is that they model the markets as a normal distribution but market performance isn’t normally distributed. Those tails are a lot fatter than the rocket scientists think, and eventually they’ll get em, just like portfolio insurance in ‘87, inverse floaters with Orange County, etc. Another name for a computer model is a wild ass guess. This is why I just shake my head and laugh when global warming computer model predictions 100 years out are presented as certain disaster when just changing the assumptions a little bit have huge impacts on the outcomes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by BM
2007-03-29 09:03:36

Hehe, they could still be normal, but with larger kurtosis (fatter tails).

 
Comment by housing_apocalypse_now
2007-03-29 09:29:28

The problem with risk modeling is it always looks backwards…. ALWAYS. Doesn’t matter how sophisimacated it is. Blowups generally happen when things that have never been correlated, ever, suddenly go to R = 1. Well of course stuff blows up, because all anyone’s computer thinks is that X and Y never correlate! Oops!

 
Comment by FutureVulture
2007-03-29 09:50:19

Actually no. A normal (gaussian) distribution always has the same shape (adjusted for standard deviation). Kurtosis measures deviation from normality. A fatter-tailed distribution could still be “bell-shaped” though, maybe that’s what you’re thinking of.

 
Comment by johnfromia
2007-03-29 10:16:42

“Blowups generally happen when things that have never been correlated, ever, suddenly go to R = 1. Well of course stuff blows up, because all anyone’s computer thinks is that X and Y never correlate! Oops!”

Good point, Apocalypse. A lot of people think non-correlation is the holy grail. But they don’t realize that just like the duration of MBS can change, correlation can and does change depending on the measurement period and has little precise predictive value.

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-29 10:35:34

“suddenly go to R = 1″

Many so-called analysts on Wall Street fail to account for the fact that humans are mammals, and mammals habituate to circumstances. When humans see real estate inflating up and up, then humans collectively attempt to catch a piece of the action (builders, homebuyers, lenders, MBS packagers, etc), and all these habituative actions drove prices to ever more unsustainable heights, and the correlation in risk across the different components of the real estate sector to 1.

 
Comment by jim A
2007-03-29 12:33:44

And the tails get thicker when you start leaning against the sides of the bell curve.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Dan
2007-03-29 06:23:38

Another WSJ article talked about builder’s surety bonds. The top five national builders have over $13B on their books for muni commitments and represent from 1/4 to 1/3 of their book value.

Comment by scdave
2007-03-29 08:52:41

Could be one of the reason’s they continue to build..??…In the development agreements that I have signed, I do not recall provisions that allowed me to modify that commitment…

 
 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-29 05:31:19

Hey America…

Old rules:

Watching some athletic freak being successful 3 out of 10 times hitting a ball, and getting paid $88 Million for a 5 year contract for their efforts.

New Rules:

How about taking a walk for an hour, 3 times every 10 days?

 
Comment by David
2007-03-29 05:49:12

David ‘the paid shill’ Lereah has been busy cheerleading the housing market and downplaying any risks. A few weeks back Lereah stated:

“Lending problems in our nation’s subprime marketplace are building, which could inhibit future housing activity and further dampen our forecast. Even so, these problems are likely to be contained and not spill over into the prime mortgage market.”

Just a week or so later Ben Bernanke, Federal Reserve Chairman, in a statement before the Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress, he stated:

At this juncture, however, the impact on the broader economy and financial markets of the problems in the subprime market seems likely to be contained. In particular, mortgages to prime borrowers and fixed-rate mortgages to all classes of borrowers continue to perform well, with low rates of delinquency. We will continue to monitor this situation closely.

Is our Federal Reserve chairman just taking the National Association of Realtors’ talking points and incorporating them into his economic outlook?

http://davidlereahwatch.blogspot.com

Comment by sf jack
2007-03-29 07:57:03

Yes!

I want BB to keep talking up how “good” housing is so that he can crank up some rate hikes.

Let’s see at least 50 bp by the end of Q3.

Drain the liquidity cesspool.

Comment by scdave
2007-03-29 09:02:13

I agree Jack…..I think its a slow dance towards rate hike’s and a attempt at a orchestrated recession to drain liquidity and strengthen the dollar….With that said, I am probably wrong as usual…

Comment by scdave
2007-03-29 09:04:11

AND, if its going to happen won’t it happen this year ?? Fed does not want to be playing with rates next year in a election year ??

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Chip
2007-03-29 11:52:24

“…won’t it happen this year ?? Fed does not want to be playing with rates next year in a election year ??”

That’s what I’d have thought.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by MGNYC
2007-03-29 05:50:50

last night on fox local news in nyc there was a story about a builder out on long island who took major deposits 50k-100k from hardworking (but apparently naive) immigrants to build them homes.
well almost 2 years later in some cases they have no home just a shell and in one case a hole in the ground. it is a segment called shame on you (very popular in ny for years) well anyway they find the guy who is responsible and stick a microphone in his face and he runs to avoid it, even into traffic (lol) and the he finally reaches the safety of his mercedes suv and speeds off.
if this guy had my 100k and did this to me i would not be sticking a microphone in his face
btw he is also bing investigated for bouncing checks to his vendors as well

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 06:09:40

“took major deposits 50k-100k from hardworking (but apparently naive) immigrants”

This is why those who don’t learn from history will be forced to repeat is. Can you say “Mafia”? An organization that originally came about to assist people who could not get justice. It then morphed into something else, but my point is, people wonder why explosions of violence come about in a society and here we are looking at the exact causes, right in the puss. Man screwing his fellow man. In the housing bubble, this is happening at all levels, from Wall Street to builders/developers, brokers, etc.

Little if any relief will ever come from the courts. So people will turn somewhere. And that may very possibly include the wealthier folks whose money disappeared in hedge funds. While those who absconded with the wealth smugly congratulate themselves. But if I were them, I wouldn’t get that party started.
After all, what good is all that money if you have to pay it to lawyers, or live behind walls surrounded by massive security, or cannot venture out unless you have a bulletproof car, body armor and bodyguards? Do they think becoming ex-pats will save them? After all, anyone can buy a ticket to the Caymen Islands.

Don’t sleep, Boyz!

Comment by chilidoggg
2007-03-29 07:51:06

I thought the word “Mafia” was an acronym for some organization “to defend from the French” hundreds of years ago in Sicily (or Corsica or Sardinia)

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 08:22:14

Actually it was Cosa Nostra to begin with, here in the States. I think, as you have said, the term “Mafia” got picked up from the past ages.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by House Inspector Clouseau
2007-03-29 10:06:38

Mafia folk don’t call themselves anything. They just introduce each other as “cosa nostra” which literally means “our thing” or more loosely “one of us”.

Outsiders then heard “cosa nostra” and capitalized it to make it more formal, thus “Cosa Nostra”

Mafia is a word that came from a play in the 1800’s, describing gangs, and was later applied to the Cosa Nostra by the Italian govt.

My understanding is that mafiosos never refer to themselves as mafia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mafia#Origins_of_the_term_.22mafia.22

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-29 10:23:17

We spent a week in Sicily about 8 years ago…

When one says “Sicily” one also says “Mafia” and maybe we were looking in all the wrong places, but all we saw was a beautiful island, with a rich history, as Sicily was everybody’s terra firma, @ some point in the game.

2500 year old Ancient Greek structures abound. A nice array of them in Agrigento, 4 or 5 of them, that are floodlit @ night.

We are always talking about going back…

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Mikey(2)
2007-03-29 05:54:04

Wonder what the statistics are on the income to mortgage ratios, subprimes aside. With wages being stagnant - or even on the downslide as far as CiruitCity goes, how many people mortgagedto the hilt are going to have to sell or face foreclosure. Factor in the inevitable increase in property tax increases, gas prices, health care costs….ouch! Like watchin’ a train wreck. Got 3-D glasses?

Comment by MGNYC
2007-03-29 06:00:03

good i am in the market for a fire sale on a 1080 plasma

 
 
Comment by MGNYC
Comment by John Fontain
2007-03-29 09:22:05

Great video. Sad for those buyers, but damn funny to watch the reporter chase him in circles around the parking lot.

 
 
Comment by Carolina W
2007-03-29 05:57:48

Anyone have any good mortgage broker forum discussion links covering what is happening in the Alt-A/low doc markets lately?
i.e. max LTV changes, increased documentation requirements

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2007-03-29 06:01:20

Dueling foreclosure maps.

According to the NY Daily News NYC Map, the foreclosures are hitting less well off Black and Latino areas (along with Staten Island, a less affluent White area, but that wasn’t the story). Lots of discussion on the real estate, and non-real estate blogs here.

http://nydailynews.com/news/2007/03/28/2007-03-28_set_up_for_a_fall-3.html

According to the WSJ’s national map, subprimes are concentrated in affluent regions like Boston and California, not in places like West Virginia.

So who is getting nailed, the rich or the poor? Could it be…everyone everwhere, with better off just in a position to hold out a little longer?

Comment by Mugsy
2007-03-29 06:42:36

Woodhaven is getting nailed hard and it didn’t appear to be >50% black or latino. Maybe it’s not just the oppressed folk getting hammered?

Where’s Reverend Al when you need him?

Comment by sf jack
2007-03-29 08:26:53

Here’s the WSJ “dueling” foreclosure map.

This might put the bailout plans to bed.

Hopefully.

*******

“Where Subprime Delinquencies Are Getting Worse

SUBPRIME MORTGAGES have been cropping up in surprising spots. Typically, these loans to home buyers with the weakest credit were concentrated in lower-income or economically depressed areas. But over the past few years, a large chunk of the subprime-loan market has shifted to higher-income metropolitan areas. In many of those wealthier areas, the delinquency rate has increased quickly. In the Sacramento, Calif., region, where the median household income ranks among the top 10th of major metropolitan areas, the portion of subprime mortgages delinquent for 60 days or more hit 14.1% in December — more than four times the level a year earlier. Other parts of California, as well as sections of Florida and Massachusetts — especially those areas where housing prices have surged — also logged rapid increases in delinquencies.”

See the map and table

The Wall Street Journal Online - 3/29/07

http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-subprimemap07-sort2.html

Or:

http://tinyurl.com/2xwrat

Comment by scdave
2007-03-29 09:14:30

Nice post……

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sf jack
2007-03-29 10:03:50

My mistake:

“delinqencies” not “foreclosures”

[I saw the NYC map and comment above about "dueling foreclosure maps"]

 
Comment by sf jack
2007-03-29 10:05:10

But still a very interesting story in that national map.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-29 06:02:12

More people i’d like you to meet.

“Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.”

Ambrose Bierce

Comment by Hoz
2007-03-29 08:35:06

Michael Moskow, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago President (Voter)

“Our best estimate is that it is in the process of stabilizing and that by the second half of the year, housing will start to pick up again.” – March 26, 2007

Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-29 10:29:58

textbook example

Comment by Hoz
2007-03-29 11:31:13

I wondered if anyone would catch it! LOL

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-29 11:40:55

Hang me me Hoz…

We’ll make beautiful statements, together.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by NOVA
2007-03-29 06:05:00

I buy computers, amongst other things, for the US government. Of course, thats only when I am not playing online games or napping. I sent in an order and had it bounced back. The quote was expired by a day. No big deal usually because the prices stay the same or drop. This time the prices had gone up! Never in 20 years have I had this happen.

Why? The chipsets, probably made in China went up a lot. BTW, I was talking to our main rep for Gov. sales. Nothing was being bought for the last few months. No budget approval until recently but agencys always have some money to buy little items.

One of my coworkers house sale fell through a couple weeks ago. The buyer couldnt get the loan approved. We also have people whose retirement dates have changed. Why? Can’t sell the house to fund it.

Comment by WT Economist
2007-03-29 06:12:10

(Why? The chipsets, probably made in China went up a lot.)

Everything points to inflation. China now has a shortage of qualified labor (true, believe it or not — remember most people in China and India are illiterate subsistence farmers) and electricity. I have a relative who buys there who says the factories can only run part of the day, because they have no power. There is not enough oil, let alone enough atmosphere to dump the exhaust in.

We had asset inflation and stable consumer prices, and the asset inflation was ignored. When we have asset price deflation and rising consumer prices, will the same rules apply?

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 06:22:38

Thanks for the info, WT. I also have a relative who does business in the manufacturing management recruitment sector. She told me a year ago that China was toast, they’ve sh*t their own bed so massively. But nobody wants to believe it. China is a bubble unto itself.

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 06:51:28

A few other comments on China, because everyone has been hyperventilating about how great its economy is. Wait until we find out the long term toxic effects of their products, and I’m referring to everything from the parts that go into the Pentagon’s weapons to the tiny brass screws you buy at Wal Mart. Oh, and the toys. We already know about the lead in these products. But down the road, I’m willing to bet that we find out there are Chinese products exported to the US that include materials soaked with low level radiation. Why should that surprise anyone? I was reading an article in Vanity Fair magazine about such products that were beginning to be produced back in the 1980s. One man lost an arm because of a gold ring that was irradiated. These materials were showing up in table legs and other furniture parts. If ladies are worried about breast cancer, how about those metal underwires in the bras made in China? How about those dishes you bought at Wal Mart and are now eating off of? Hmm?

If China doesn’t care about crapping its own house, what makes you think they wouldn’t export irradiated products to their old buddies, the US? Hey, but don’t worry, folks! Do what the doctors tell you. Just eat your fruits and vegetables, stay out of the sun, don’t smoke and avoid trans fats. If that doesn’t work, Big Pharma’s got some chemo for you.

And here we are, congratulating ourselves on how smart we are and how naive and dumb the FBs are. While we’re surrounded with crapola from China. Say, what’s that lump on my ankle?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by WArenter
2007-03-29 07:46:27

Many years ago my hubby pointed out the potential for this problem. We never buy anything to cook in or eat off of if it is made in China.

I’ve read that China is going to have significant water and food problems because pollution is so bad. Had a friend who traveled to China in 1991 and came back complaining about how her eyes bothered her the whole time due to the pollution.

 
Comment by Lionel
2007-03-29 12:52:59

You don’t even have to buy anything from China to be affected:

When an American hockey player suffered symptoms from mercury contamination, he never expected that he might have power plants half way across the world in China to blame. With its growing appetite for energy, China is finding its many coal-burning power plants hard at work generating the much needed electricity power – as well as huge amounts of air pollutants like sulfur dioxide and mercury. The earth’s climate system, however, does not recognize national borders, and that is how increased quantities of Chinese pollutants have joined, what the authors in this article call, a global “conveyor belt of bad air.” This conveyor belt circles around the world, sending airborne polluting chemicals and particulates from one country to another, posing global health threats. Some scientists have estimated that 30% or more of the mercury settling into America’s ecosystems comes from abroad – China, in particular. Experts have sought for possible solutions to transboundary pollution, but international environmental treaties have seldom worked effectively and the economic incentive for Chinese power plants is weak in this case. How to make local policies responsive to global problems? – YaleGlobal

 
 
Comment by Hoz
2007-03-29 07:45:13

“China was toast.” Agree, but not before the 2008 Olympics and with careful currency moves China could grow at 9%+ until the 2010 World Expo in Shanghai.

The reason that China is toast is its continuing support of the US economy. US consumers buy Chinese goods, China buys US Bonds. Mutually assured economic destruction.

Intel and AMD move to China and that doesn’t raise the howls that occurred when Halliburton moves to Dubai. Just another outsourcing. The difference is that we are used to seeing jobs go to China.

Now the US is in the unenviable position of seeing low paid workers being laid off to higher lower paid workers (circuit city- a good short) as well as seeing financial companies shifting higher paid positions overseas. We have already lost manufacturing.

The US and China are toast.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-29 09:54:50

Nice post Hoz…

The little tiny ($1 1/2 TRILLION) thing we owe them, looms large as well.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2007-03-29 09:21:50

asset price deflation and rising consumer prices ??

Stagflation ??

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by NOVA
2007-03-29 06:36:58

China will also have around 40 million more males than females. Never a good thing in any society. Methinks, Siberia with a little warming, will look real nice in a few years.

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 06:59:29

Methinks Siberia already looks good to the Chinese. Russia is sitting on some pretty large energy reserves. If the Chinese can only run the factories part time and they have to look at all that abundance north of them, it’s a no brainer.

Can you say “Siberistan”?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-03-29 07:26:55

They are already there and Russia is really worried about it. Every couple years there are these massive pograms when the Russians clean out Chinese villages/towns that were established since the prior pogram.

The Chinese are primarily engaged in logging, fishing, hunting (tiger penis anybody?) and farming. Sometimes they establish mini factories producing all kinds of stuff.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-29 10:02:14

I read Jim Roger’s “Investment Biker” many years ago and it opened my eyes up to the difference between Russia and China…

Russia never had any history of capitalism and look what they’ve done with their oil proceeds?

I hate to call you out, but you look like cold weather versions of the other wastrels, that have oil… in the Middle East.

From Borscht to Bling, Bada Bing!

P’cola:

There’s a very good reason there are Chinese lurking around Russia.

The smell of opportunity, reeks.

 
Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-03-29 13:51:55

“I hate to call you out, but you look like cold weather versions of the other wastrels, that have oil… in the Middle East.”

LOL. You are not telling me anything I haven’t known for about ten years. I have also heard much better (worse) comparisons/analogies. Just remember that those ME guys only have oil while Russia has about 40% of the world’s supply of everything on the Periodic Table!

“Russia never had any history of capitalism and look what they’ve done with their oil proceeds?”

No question they can squander it but somehow over the last seven years Russia has amassed the third largest hard currency reserves in the World. The ruble has also strengthened about 17% against the USD over the past four years.

 
 
Comment by Hoz
2007-03-29 07:19:54

So does China.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 10:26:28

Lol, Hoz. You posted that response to something else and then alad’s comment about the smell of opportunity reeks appears above your comment. LMAO.

 
 
 
 
Comment by sigalarm
2007-03-29 06:58:04

Intersting you bring this up. Several of my government customers say their budgets are tight at the moment. Given the amount of spending approved by congress I find this a puzzle.

 
Comment by crispy&cole
2007-03-29 08:11:52

“Of course, thats only when I am not playing online games or napping.”

lmao!!!!

Comment by John M
2007-03-29 08:24:29

OT - crispy, the WSJ has a subprime heat map, and Bakersfield is listed in one of the hottest spots.

http://tinyurl.com/2xwrat

Comment by crispy&cole
2007-03-29 09:03:51

Our whole county is dark, it that bad??

I sent you an email John.

Thanks!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by PBRenter
2007-03-29 15:50:53

The cost of everything imported into the US is about to go up. The 10 year rail contracts the ocean carriers had are expiring within the next couple of months. All inland charges are going up 30-40%. And the new contracts are not locking in prices for extended periods of time.

 
 
Comment by weez
2007-03-29 06:22:51

another bad sign for homesellers….an article in todays orlando sentinel.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/orl-nosigns29_107mar29,0,6384828.story?coll=orl-home-headlines

Comment by wmbz
2007-03-29 06:34:19

I have been picking up open house signs and throwing them away for years now. Nothing but an eye sore, and against the rules. Realtors seem to think their open house/for sale signs should trump the law.

 
Comment by Mikey(2)
2007-03-29 06:36:46

Sounds like the realtors are going to actually spend some of that 6% for a change. I don’t like paying for advertising either, but that’s the way business goes. Pay for an ad in the paper. Spend some cash for website ads. Gotta spend money to make money.

 
Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-03-29 06:53:31

“But most of the signs, whether those placed by real-estate agents, new-home builders or homeowners, are there illegally — and local governments are cracking down. A coordinated, statewide sweep six months ago collected more than 7,000 signs in just Orange and Seminole counties.”

Looks like South Florida could use some high quality California sign spinners.

Comment by scdave
2007-03-29 09:32:10

yeah….And we can create a whole new municipal department for this task including multiple pay levels of “Sign enforcement engineers” with full benifits of course….It never friggen ends !!!

Comment by crash1
2007-03-29 17:13:08

Don’t kid yourself, that’s what I do for a living, and in my town a new municipal department was just created with multiple pay levels for the enforcement people. Oh, and there are good benefits.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by aPOPka gurl
2007-03-29 07:09:02

And just when you thought the Orlando couldn’t get any more ‘frustrating’… the Realtors word of the day…er…month? Spring? (is it Spring yet???) Year…Decade………..

 
Comment by Steve W
2007-03-29 07:11:24

If your realtor can’t cough up the time and $25 for the permits to get the open house signs up, you need to find a new realtor.

Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-29 07:19:08

They aren’t cleaning up the signs in South Tampa. I keep seeing “Why rent when you can own,” and “Zero down financing,” and “Real Estate apprentice wanted, 2-3k a month, starting . . .” My favorite sign ON real estate sites (not public property) is “Only one left,” or “Only one remaining,” meaning “Only one [entire tract or entire empty project] remaining.”

Comment by Mike
2007-03-29 07:58:57

My all time favorite sign is “Too Late”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Beer and Cigar Guy
2007-03-29 09:38:17

I still like the, “Investor Seeks Apprentice-$20,000/month!”

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-03-29 10:27:28

How does this work? The “apprentice” takes out a rigged, excessive loan, and splits the difference with the “investor?” It sure looks illegal.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-03-29 06:24:22

According to the WSJ, ResCap is going to reduce lending in the subprime space:

By BHATTIPROLU MURTI
March 29, 2007; Page A2

General Motors Acceptance Corp. said Wednesday that it intends to “sharply” cut the volume of subprime mortgages originated by its Residential Capital LLC unit for 2007, amid continued pressure from housing prices and the nonprime mortgage market.

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-29 06:46:51

Home loan defaults skyrocket in county
Problem much worse in other parts of U.S.
By Roger Showley
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

March 29, 2007

Homeowners throughout San Diego County are defaulting on their loans and losing their properties to foreclosure at an increasingly rapid pace, a shattering event that nevertheless remains far less extensive here than the mortgage problems arising elsewhere in the nation.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20070329-9999-1n29default.html

Comment by JA
2007-03-29 07:02:53

Mass just came out with some Feb foreclosures:

2 foreclosure notices for every 3 homes sold in Feb. Inventory starting to rise as we get into spring….

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 07:11:53

Hey, they were right! We got the fabled Spring Bounce after all. Except it wasn’t in sales, but in foreclosures!

Here comes the Easter Bunny, hippity-hop, hippity-hop!

 
Comment by sigalarm
2007-03-29 08:03:30

Boston MA Inventory Numbers (1 Month Ago)
Single Family Total Properties: 26,030 (24,168) +7%
Condo Total Properties 15,209 (14,472) +5%

The spring inventory bounce is well underway! Nationally we broke 1.7M Single Family units in the MLS, an increase of 93,572 in one month alone, a nationwide increse of 6% of inventory in the last month.

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-03-29 07:13:28

Here is a graphic from the WSJ describing the situation on a national scale. All the major cities are included together with the percentage of subprime mortgages and delinquency rates for 2005 and 2006. It’s really worth a peak. Beware of California and Florida’s exposure to dark matter. Also, Las Vegas, parts of the mid-west, Houston, Richmond, and so on:

http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-subprimemap07-sort2.html

 
Comment by JWM in SD
2007-03-29 07:28:20

“far less extensive here ” Oh just you wait and see Mr. Showley. Most of the foreclosures here are due to EPDs right now. SD hasn’t seen the big reset waves just yet but they’re coming alright.

 
Comment by OB_Tom
2007-03-29 08:10:36

“Edward Leamer, director of the UCLA Anderson Forecast, agreed, saying the California housing market is likely to resemble an “L,” as prices and sales drop and then remain low for the foreseeable future.”

That’s right, resembling an “L”, right on the forehead of the FB.

Comment by 85249 is Toast
2007-03-29 09:01:20

“Edward Leamer, director of the UCLA Anderson Forecast, agreed, saying the California housing market is likely to resemble an “L,” as prices and sales drop and then remain low for the foreseeable future.”

That was an easy mistake to make for this journalist. The “L” is just below the “I” on the keyboard.

Comment by housing_apocalypse_now
2007-03-29 09:36:13

Ha ha. I remamber a few years back people were debating what kind of bottom the stock market would have. Would it be a U bottom? A V bottom? Perhaps a W bottom? Worst-case scenario would have been an L bottom.

Then one guy’s line was, “Don’t forget, we can also have I.”

h_a_n aka passthebubbly

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2007-03-29 09:35:34

“right on the forehead of the FB”

L = lobotomy

American Heritage New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition - Cite This Source
lobotomy [(luh-bot-uh-mee, loh-bot-uh-mee)]

A surgical incision into one or more of the nerve masses in the front of the brain.

Note: Because people who have had a lobotomy often become quite passive after the operation, the term is often used to refer to something that shows a lack of response or reaction:
“Real Estate was so tired it just sat there as if it had been lobotomized.”

Comment by OB_Tom
2007-03-29 10:02:28

I was thinking L for Loser, but yeah, Lobotomy, why not…?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-29 10:25:39

If these guys are right, San Diego home prices will fall on average by 13% this year. That would be a $78,000 drop in value for a home valued at the current ziprealty.com median SFR wishing price of $599,000. As this is more than the median household income for San Diego County, why would anyone other than a really rich guy want to buy a home in San Diego right now, unless they were woefully misinformed? And for that matter, I don’t think rich folks like to lose money, either.

As for the flattening out after a 13% drop, we’ll see. I don’t think the analysis takes into proper consideration the dry rot of high risk lending, nor the fact that foreclosures (and REO sales) will snowball if the 13% price decline comes to pass. The downturn could become self-sustaining.

‘Florida-based Housing Predictor, an online real estate data company, ranked San Diego this week as the nation’s second-worst housing market, behind Los Angeles. The company said San Diego was likely to see a 13 percent drop in average home prices this year.

“What we foresee is the market in San Diego bottoming out toward the end of this year and the future flattening,” said Housing Predictor editor Mike Colpitts.’

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-29 10:41:37

Be sure to click on the link “Graphic: Top ZIP codes for defaults, foreclosures.” One striking statistic: Five defaults in Rancho Santa Fe so far this year; average loan amount = $978,000.

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-29 06:50:19
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-03-29 07:16:30

Funny… It hasn’t showed up yet but I just posted this under your Union-Tribune post.

 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-03-29 07:24:00

What’s more, the graphic looks like something the CDC would publish describing the spread of some kind of mysterious plague like illness.

Comment by crispy&cole
2007-03-29 09:01:21

LOL. That is what I thought also.

My whole county is the dark color, is that bad??

Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-03-29 09:36:23

It’s time to pullout the duct tape. The subprime slime fungus is spreading. Symptoms include but are not limitied to payment shock, confusion, and soreness when sitting.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Portland Mainer
2007-03-29 06:53:18

March 28, 2007

Your Home a Great Investment or Is It?

What if you bought a home for slightly above $350K and after thirty years sold it for over $1.5 million dollars. Pretty sweet huh?

Not so fast.

Earlier this month, the Wall Street Journal had a great article on the subject. In the article, Why your home isn’t the investment you think it is (subscription required), writer David Crook explained a house isn’t necessarily always a great investment.
http://business.mainetoday.com/financialsense/010459.html

Comment by David
2007-03-29 09:42:10

Actually, I have done the analysis myself. My conclusion: I get free rent, basically.

Comment by OB_Tom
2007-03-29 10:24:14

Is a reliable car a good investment? No. Is it a good buy? Yes, definitely. Same thing with a house. If prices were reasonable and tracked inflation, then I would buy in a heartbeat. Would I buy two? No I don’t think so.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2007-03-29 11:37:00

You get FREE RENT like my Mom does…….House is paid off, and the tenat pay a high enough rent to cover the $8000+ year taxes plus insurance water repairs etc…….. and my mom can live off the SS and a small pension, and still get ou and work a 10-15 hours a week to keep her Blue Cross

 
 
 
Comment by Portland Mainer
2007-03-29 07:01:01

Single-family home prices are on the rise in Maine. According to the Maine Real Estate Information System, Inc., sales prices of existing homes were up 4.84 percent during the month of February when compared to one year ago.
The statewide median existing home sales price reached $193,950 for the month, up from February 2006’s price of $185,000. The median sales price indicates that half of the homes were sold for more and half sold for less. A total of 698 homes changed hands during the month, down a slight 1.13 percent.
Nationally, sales of single-family, existing homes decreased 3.4 percent from last February. According to the National Association of Realtors (NAR), the median sales price for those homes dropped 1.5 percent to $211,100.

http://www.mreis.com/

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 07:03:29

Can you feel it, folks? This avalanche is picking up steam.

Comment by ajh
2007-03-29 07:24:29

Errrrr, avalanche + steam = flood (if I remember my high school physics correctly at a 30 year remove).

Comment by palmetto
2007-03-29 08:30:41

OTAY! Whew, this is a tough room!

OK, the freight train is picking up speed and is bearing down out of control. Who was the poster who said sometimes the light you see at the end of the tunnel is from the freight train coming at you full speed?

 
Comment by housing_apocalypse_now
2007-03-29 09:31:24

We’re Johnstown, Pennsylvania and it’s the spring of 1889.

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-03-29 09:47:57

Hurricane akin to the Galveston Flood of 1900 - the worst disaster in American history.

 
 
 
Comment by eastcoaster
2007-03-29 07:06:54

I know Zillow isn’t a reliable gauge of how the market truly is, however I’m disgusted to see that it’s showing homes in my area as being up in price again recently. I feel like this will never end, that - no matter how patient I am - homes will always be out of my reach. And we’re talking 2BR, 1BA, 50-year old, 1000 sq. ft. ranchers. I’m not shooting for anything ridiculous. SO frustrating.

Comment by jag
2007-03-29 08:35:27

My home in Boston according to Zillow is down 18%. While I don’t think it was ever worth what Zillow estimated at the peak, at least it seems to be getting some of the depreciation around here right. Most sales I track are down 20% from peak. They’ll likely decline another 10% this spring (at least).
So I’d guess the total decline from peak will register 33% by May. And I’d suggest it can go another 10-20% down over the next few years bringing the total decline down to 40-50% for most properties before it comes close to bottoming.
Assuming the economy only goes into a reasonable recession that should get prices much closer aligned to affordibility; where equilibrium will be achieved again.

 
 
Comment by krazy_canuck
2007-03-29 07:16:04

I think that a topic for the weekend should be a discussion of mutual funds that have significant exposure to subprime and MBS in general.. I think the participants of this blog would like to know whta funds to stay away from…

Comment by OB_Tom
2007-03-29 13:21:24

I second that. Especially with the very limited choice I have in my company sponsored 401k. It’s almost impossible to judge what the RE exposure is from the prospectus that the various funds publish. I’m not even sure the most conservative money market or guaranteed interest funds don’t have some packaged subprime hidden in their portofolio.

 
 
Comment by mina
2007-03-29 07:26:32

“As many as 2.4 million Americans may lose their homes because of the collapse of subprime lenders and foreclosures” …

forgive me but isn’t it the other way around? the subprime lenders collapsing because ppl can’t afford their homes and are giving them up to foreclosure?

Mina

Comment by But_Im_Not_Dead_Yet
2007-03-29 12:26:38

Yes. Good point…

 
 
Comment by tweedle-dee (not dumb)
2007-03-29 07:32:58

The bubble continues in Canada.
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/homebuyers/story.html?id=56836d00-8809-43af-8016-02d43f3fda4f&k=797

It must be because of a shortage of land around places like Saskatoon. Its surrounded by flat farm land for as far as the eye can see.

Its different there.

Comment by Curt
2007-03-29 08:04:04

It must be because of a shortage of land around places like Saskatoon. Its surrounded by flat farm land for as far as the eye can see.

No, that’s not it. It’s, “Everybody wants to live there!”

 
Comment by Big Bubble Popper
2007-03-29 08:10:06

The land shortage is very acute in Canada. Expect the Yukon, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut to fill up very soon. I better buy some land on Baffin Island right now or else I will be priced out forever.

Comment by tweedle-dee (not dumb)
2007-03-29 09:55:23

I don’t know if people can really fathom how much land is open in Western Canada. From Saskatoon, you can drive for 6 HOURS to the west until you reach a settlement with more than 20,000 people. Thats Calgary, with 1M people. To the east, the next city is Winnipeg. Thats 8 HOURS away. In between, its all flat farm land. Open, well drained, inexpensive. 160 acres of land sells for about $75K.

Comment by josemanolo7
2007-03-29 14:29:48

its land area is bigger than the us, yet their population is smaller than california. that is a lot of room.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by peterpaul
2007-03-29 07:45:27

Don’t count China out. While it is true that it has a lot of problems: wasteful and excessive development and duplication of businesses and infrastructure in many areas; horrendous pollution problems; a declining water table; a mass of semi-literate and semi-skilled farmers come workers; approximately 40 million too few women.

However, it does have some massive advantages: many natural resources; the economic elite of SE Asia is ethnically Chinese; a one party state with no contendors/competition for the forseeable future; a populace with very few civil institutions capable of challenging the party; a proven willingness to do violence to their own people should problems arise.

I have little doubt that many of the businessman think of and treat their workers as little more than slaves to be exploited. Combine this with a government willing to subsidize these businesses indirectly and an international market searching for the cheapest price and you have a recipe for continued success.

Comment by KIA
2007-03-29 08:03:29

“…you have a recipe for continued success.”

Or another revolution.

Comment by AKRon
2007-03-29 15:55:12

“Public Security Minister Zhou Yongkang said last month that the number of what he called “mass incidents” was rising fast across China, according to an official who heard Zhou speak at a closed meeting. Zhou said that 3.76 million Chinese took part in 74,000 such protests last year, which he characterized as a dramatic increase.”

China had at least 74,000 riots last year (!)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/09/AR2005080901323.html

 
 
Comment by Hoz
2007-03-29 08:16:20

“Labor officials in China’s southern province of Guangdong said Thursday they are investigating reports that fast-food chains such as McDonald’s and KFC pay their part-time workers less than the minimum wage of about US$1 an hour.”

Funny that it is US companies that get hit with labor violations. WalMart is unionized in China.

 
 
Comment by Steve W
2007-03-29 07:49:19
 
Comment by BM
2007-03-29 07:52:26

I invite all West Los Angeles (and surrounding areas who’d like to attend) to a housing bubble blog party at the San Francisco Saloon, Saturday, March 31st at 6 p.m.

The S.F. Saloon is located on the north side of Pico Blvd. between Gateway and Barrington (very close to Gateway).

imploder, lainvestorgirl, cassiopeia, sm_landlord, LARenter, formerlahomeowner, you’re all invited.

I’ll hold us a table–and it just winds up being my wife and I, so be it!

Cheers!

Comment by cassiopeia
2007-03-29 17:44:27

BM, I would love to go, and thanks a lot for the invitation, but I had arranged another engagement for Saturday before I knew about this. Don’t forget to take good pix and send them to Ben!!!

 
 
Comment by BubbleWatcher
2007-03-29 07:52:43

Money is not tight yet. I just took out $18K from my credit card at 0% until Aug 2008 (!). This may not be as exciting as zero-down cash-back refi, but sill an indicator of more money than banks seem to be able to store.

Comment by KIA
2007-03-29 08:23:12

Yeah, I’m still hearing mortgage advertisements all over the radio in Northern Virginia and of course we all see the dancing figures on the internet ads all the time.

I’ll tell you what I’m not hearing which surprises me. I’m not hearing advertisements for big spring sales for major homebuilders. I find this… odd. I know they have large inventories. I’ve seen a half-dozen developments where they have the model home built and nothing else, and there is no work going on at the site. I checked several websites: Lennar, Pulte, Centex, Ryland Group, Toll Brothers. Only Toll had a “Spring Special” but no terms were provided, only “Ask your sales representative for more information.” Ryland says it’s having a 40th anniversary special, but when I put in a zip code, it looked like a standard listing with no particular discount.

This started me thinking (always an uncertain proposition): Why? Why wouldn’t the big homebuilders be advertising the heck out of their inventory to dump it off as fast as possible? The only answers I could hypothesize are:

1) they urgently need to keep the values inflated on their balance sheets so they stay solvent on paper or don’t suffer a massive quarterly loss and attendant stock drop; or

2) I saw financing links on the builder sites which reminds me that many of these builders have been acting as mortgage brokers during the boom. This leads me to wonder whether the builders may be receiving buy-back demands from mortgage pools on garbage loans the builders were shoveling out over the last few years. This means the builders would really, really need to have a strong asset base so they can borrow funds to resolve the demands. Otherwise they may be headed down the path of Mortgage Lenders or New Century.

Either of these possibilities (or both) could explain why the homebuilders are keeping quiet and staying low. They might be in the very same quandry as many FB’s: they cannot discount the houses without dire consequences.

The ploy would be futile, of course. If either of these possibilities (or both) are actually in play, it’s only a matter of time until the word gets out.

Comment by CA renter
2007-03-30 03:53:56

Good thinking, KIA! I think the HBs try to keep their lending arms separate, but that might not be the case with most or all.

As you probably know, Beazer (BZH) is being investigated for this right now. Should be interesting to see if it spreads to the other HBs.

 
 
Comment by arroyogrande
2007-03-29 09:09:28

“I just took out $18K from my credit card at 0% until Aug 2008″

Is that cash? I want some! Mini carry trade…

Comment by BubbleWatcher
2007-03-29 10:59:36

Yes, carry trade is exactly what it is. It is a check that draws from your credit line. You can deposit it to your checking account and then invest (although the ad on it suggested I should make a larger purchase or complete a home improvement project).

I paid off around $20K last month that I have been carrying from the last year at similar APRs, but I thought it would be over by now. So I was surprised to get this kind of offer last week.

 
 
Comment by cassiopeia
2007-03-29 19:02:45

Good, bubblewatcher. Now go get the new refrigerator and you have 18 months to pay it off interest free. Just make sure it’s not some kind of trick offer where you only get the deal for balance transfers. I hate it when they do that because I have no balance to transfer. With these offers around, I always wonder how people manage to bury themselves in debt in such a way that they can never get out, barring some kind of medical catastrophe.

 
 
Comment by Daisy in AZ
2007-03-29 08:53:21

Any thoughts about Tucson?

My husband and I (retirement age) sold our home in the Pacific Northwest and moved to a rental in Tucson. Here’s the thing: we’d like to buy
something, eventually, but like most of you (well, all of you) we don’t want to finance some flipper’s retirement on a house which has had its asking price inflated by 50% in the last two years. There are 62 interchangeable smalll-lot houses for sale in our neighborhood. Not one of them is less than 100-150K overpriced. Most of them have sold 2 or 3 times in the last 4 years. Many are owned by out of state buyers, a few by lenders. We’ve been watching these listings for over a year now and though we’ve definitely seen an explosion in inventory, we don’t see much movement in asking price.

So is the market in Arizona so f*cked up that it will take years to return to sanity?

Comment by 85249 is Toast
2007-03-29 09:19:28

No, the market is going to collapse quickly. Nothing is selling anymore. Anyone who wanted a house has one (or two) already, inventory is at an all-time high (and climbing), foreclosures are coming on the market faster than ever, and the easy credit door has been slammed shut.

Lots of supply + no demand + no money = catastrophic collapse in price

I think prices will start falling significantly by the end of this summer. Nothing is moving here in the Valley just as in Tucson, and I’m already seeing some serious price cuts here (neighbors undercutting each other by $100,000 or more in many cases).

I know it’s difficult to hear it, but keep waiting. Most of these FBs can’t hold on much longer as nothing is moving and more and more foreclosures come on the market. I’m convinced that if you wait long enough, you’ll be able to find exactly what you want for less than $70 per square foot. How much less? Who knows?

 
Comment by Ex-Arizonan
2007-03-29 09:23:56

Where in Tucson are you? Sounds like maybe Continental Ranch or Sweetwater? I think that Tucson probably will take awhile to shake out - I’d be looking for a return to something like $100/sqft before buying. A friend of mine is a realtor there and reported that he recently scored a 7% commission from KB for a 200k place. He said he’s really busy but it didn’t sound like prices were going up - he’s just seeing a lot of activity.

I think prices will drift down eventually, though even when I moved there in the mid-90s there was a sharp division between the midtown housing stock and the nicer stuff in the foothills/outer burbs. Of course back then the really extravagent places went for 350-450k ;) In any case you’ll always pay a premium for a nice lot with a view but in my experience it’s totally worth doing. I still miss that place.

 
 
Comment by arroyogrande
2007-03-29 09:07:15

yahoo news,
“Mortgage crisis hits million-dollar homes”
http://tinyurl.com/2sv67q

“”Because of the financing that was possible, so many people bought the bigger house, the million-dollar house with the bowling alley or the tennis court outside,” says Guzek, who works for GreenPath Debt Solutions, a nonprofit service based in Farmington Hills, Michigan. “People across all income brackets are having financial hardship.”

For those on the frontlines of the growing U.S. mortgage crisis, these are the early signs that the explosion of subprime loans made to mostly poorer borrowers is reaching higher ground. The damage is hitting homes financed through jumbo loans for more than $400,000 and so-called Alt-A loans that are a notch above subprime and a step below prime.”

“Just as more expensive homes are beginning to fall through the cracks, the fear is higher-rated bonds within CDO structures may be vulnerable.

The declining performance of subprime loans have resulted in CDOs losing about $20 billion in market value, according to investment bank Lehman Brothers. ”

“Adding to the grief, mortgage scams and con artists trying to take advantage of distressed homeowners abound, boosting foreclosure rates, county workers said.

“It’s not the American Dream anymore,” said Fran Napolitano, a county clerk in Hackensack. “It’s ‘who can I stab next.”‘ ”

“Increasingly, she offers different advice than devising financial plans to save her clients’ homes.

“If they can’t afford it, sometimes the best thing for them is to walk away,” Guzek said.”

Comment by lalaland
2007-03-29 10:10:44

Very interesting article — thanks for posting.

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-29 12:06:47

Click on the link (from the article linked below) captioned “Graphic: Top ZIP codes for defaults, foreclosures.”

One striking statistic: Five defaults in Rancho Santa Fe so far this year; average loan amount = $978,000. Rancho Santa Fe is a SD zipcode (92067) where the median home currently on the market lists for $3.8m (ziprealty.com).

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20070329-9999-1n29default.html

Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-29 12:32:02

Actually they changed the online format; just scroll down to the bottom of the article to find the table I referenced.

 
 
 
Comment by dude
2007-03-29 09:22:14

Bought to cover my CFC short this morning @34.20 I also managed to find a couple thousand shares of FMT to short yesterday. That one seems to be taking the long hard journey into night.

I’ll see what PPT action is this afternoon. I feel a lot better being in and short right now than at cash.

 
Comment by mina
2007-03-29 10:55:23

totally OT but hilarious: execs from the company helping to build the Fence between the US and Mexico have been sentenced for hiring undocumented workers.

roflmfao

Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-03-29 13:39:55

You got a link on that? LMAO!

 
 
Comment by Big V
2007-03-29 11:31:52

I know this is a late post, but can anyone here comment on the housing situation in France? I know someone who is working with an RE “expert” (read salesperson) who is trying to convince her to buy something there.

Comment by John Fleming
2007-03-29 13:46:02

Big V,

In Europe most countries have had their RE bubble, with double digit % increases for several years. France had a average 100% increase in 5-6 years, with lots of extra bubble areas in some hotspots. A village needs only one English buyer to make all its peasants feel wealthy.
Since Q3-Q4 2006, the market is stagnating. Many RE agencies are closing or bought by financial holdings. Average prices are starting to come down slightly. Inventories are rising quickly and sales are double digit down. As most European countries housing statistics are a well kept secret between FNAIM(french NAR), the ‘notaires’ and government statistics bureau. Last official figure was housing starts 2006, down 15%(to 2005).
It’s clear that the market has topped on the affordability issue.
In 3 years time the average mortgage went from 15 to 25 years.
And in 23 days their are the ‘Presidential Elections’.
Altough all official media were touting until recently that everything was fine, all of a sudden the main candidates are looking for ways to get the propertymachine running again, because it’s the key of the french(reed European) economy.
So, I’m sure there is trouble in bubbleland.
If your friend reads french, here is a good link:

http://www.bulle-immobiliere.org/forum/

P.S.: Where in France is she looking?

Comment by Big V
2007-03-29 16:03:36

Sorry so late to respond.

She’s looking in Nice.

Her RE agent even has her going to French movies so she can see how wonderful her new home will be (barf).

 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-29 12:01:02

Prenote to the article linked in below: California has 12 percent of the national population (36m / 300m) but 13 percent of the subprime loans.
———————————————————————————
California Investigates Subprime Mortgage Industry (Update1)
By Karen Gullo

March 29 (Bloomberg) — California Attorney General Jerry Brown opened an investigation of the subprime mortgage industry, which made the state the largest U.S. market for high-risk home loans.

Gareth Lacy, Brown’s spokesman, said yesterday that the attorney general has an active investigation under way. Lacy wouldn’t say which companies may be targeted or how far the probe has progressed.

“I think it’s appropriate for the attorney general to take a look, especially if there’s been abuses in lending practices,” state Senator Mike Machado, a Democrat from Stockton, California, said in a telephone interview. “There’s a lack of scrutiny over the practices and the brokers engaged in originating some of these loans.”

Half of the 20 biggest U.S. subprime lenders, including No. 2 New Century Financial Corp., which is trying to avoid bankruptcy, are located in California, according to the newsletter Inside Mortgage Finance. The industry is under scrutiny by regulators after delinquencies on subprime mortgages rose to 13.3 percent last quarter, the highest since September 2002.

About 13 percent of the U.S.’s subprime loans are in California, according to the Washington-based Mortgage Bankers Association. Predatory lending practices and improper disclosure of terms may violate state consumer-protection and fair-lending laws, Machado said.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aNSnhL5wGMck&refer=home

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-03-29 12:08:44

“For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.”

Richard Feynman

Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-29 13:00:33

Physicist quote day (see mine below…)

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-29 12:54:29

A simple explanation of the subprime problem from a Sacramento Bee columnist follows below. Too bad subprime is only the tip of the high risk lending iceberg in California.

“Subprime mortgages are basically loans offered to people with credit problems. They carry interest rates that can be way higher than those of conventional loans, and they sometimes are loaded with gimmicks, such as tiny up-front rates that balloon in the second or third year.

Some people who want to buy a house, or hold onto the house they have, can’t meet the financial requirements of a conventional loan. Mortgage brokers and lenders eager to tap into this market of borrowers steer them into signing up for loans that are initially affordable, sometimes through tricks such as “liars loans,” where the borrower’s income is inflated on the application and not verified by anyone.

The mortgage brokers then sell the loans to larger financial institutions, some of which sell stock in the loans to individual investors. It’s the gullible meeting the greedy.

But as interest rates on the loans escalate, the borrowers can’t make the payments and fall behind or default.

The big financial guys exercise clauses in their deals with the brokers that force the brokers to take back the loans that go south. The brokers go broke, and investors in the banks and mortgage companies lose money.

The stock market crashes and life as we know it grinds to a halt. Or it would if this were a widespread problem. It’s estimated as many as 15 percent of subprime loans turn out badly, which of course means 85 percent work out OK.”

http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/145892.html

“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” –Albert Einstein–

 
Comment by Andre
2007-03-29 12:56:24

“The waiting time is over, now is the time to buy! Buyers market is shifting to a balanced market, interest rates are still low, will you be left on the sidelines AGAIN? Call to see this wonderful home today!”

The delusional nature of real estate “professionals” never ceases to amaze me.

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-29 12:59:22

PDATE 1-IndyMac CEO: Subprime contagion fears overblown
Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:19PM EDT
IndyMac says its own lending safer than subprime
IndyMac says 3 pct of its 2006 loans were subprime
IndyMac Bancorp says lower 2007 earnings likely
IndyMac Bancorp sees tough 2007, freezes salaries

NEW YORK, March 29 (Reuters) - IndyMac Bancorp Inc. (NDE.N: Quote, Profile, Research) said on Thursday its lending practices are far safer than those of many “subprime” lenders, calling investor fears that it will suffer heavily from rising defaults “overblown.”

Shares in the California mortgage specialist rose more than 6 percent after it issued the news release.

IndyMac, which is also one of the largest U.S. savings and loans, specializes in “Alt-A” mortgages, which have risk levels ranking between “prime” and “subprime” mortgages, or which do not qualify for the lowest rates.

http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN2923801120070329

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-03-29 13:04:17

Jobs abound in Calif. hub of shaky subprime lenders
Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:43PM EDT
Market View
NEWC ()
Last: $1.09
Change: -0.02 (-1.80%)
Revenue (ttm): $2,178.5M
EPS: 6.71
Market Cap: $78.21M
Time: 3:46pm ET

New Century cuts Freddie Mac tie
New Century franchise largely destroyed-analyst
UPDATE 1-New Century sees $46 mln loss from Barclays pact
Cash-strapped New Century taps Lazard as adviser

By Jim Christie

SAN FRANCISCO, March 28 (Reuters) - Employees of subprime mortgage lenders in California’s Orange County slated for pink slips will be able to find new jobs quickly because other companies in the state’s second most populous county are desperate for workers, economists say.

“This won’t sink the Orange County economy,” said Christopher Thornberg a principal at Beacon Economics in Los Angeles.

Orange County, famous as the home of Disneyland and for posting the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history in the mid-1990s, is expected to shrug off the loss of the jobs and the potential loss of subprime lenders that put down roots there, analysts say.

http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN2832223020070328

 
Comment by ahansen
2007-03-29 14:09:39

If anyone is in the mood to rant, this will make your day. A movement called “stop the squeeze” wants debt relief for people who are being “victimized” by their credit cards, mortgages, loans….
Go to, guys. I know you can have a field day with this.

http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/03/29/its-time-to-stop-the-squeeze-2/#comment-933

 
Comment by John Fleming
2007-03-29 14:37:28

Interesting comment on Roubini’s blog:

“According to Barry Ritholtz, in 2005 47% of Washington Mutual’s (WM) (his example bank) ARM loans were in NEGATIVE AMORTIZATION (payments were not covering the interest charges so the shortfall is added to the principal). It’s OK though because the bank (and I wish I was joking) BOOKS THE NEGATIVE AMORTIZATION AS EARNINGS. “In Q1 2005, WaMu booked $25 million of negative amortization as earnings; in the same period for 2006 the number was $203 million.” Wow, on track to do almost $1Bn in “profit” based on their gain in “house value” that is owed to them. ”

Written by david cee on 2007-03-29 16:08:05

Do we have an accountant on board?

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post