April 6, 2007

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For April 6, 2007

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

250 Comments »

Comment by jmf
2007-04-06 05:16:30

Quality Of Living / City Rankings

quite surprising…..

http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/

Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 06:42:09

Ich muess mein Deutsch besser lernen…

Comment by jmf
2007-04-06 06:49:03

its better than my english……

Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 07:01:08

Ich kann dein English alle verstehen.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by krills
2007-04-06 09:08:22

Ventura County Star front page Grocery Unions to strike in California on April 13th.

Comment by aNYCdj
2007-04-06 10:25:57

Boy thats really DUMB, now all the loan officers can get those $12hr bagging jobs….which is worse?

 
 
Comment by the_voz
2007-04-06 10:13:35

entire list, nice to visit, living there, nightmarish

 
 
Comment by tg
2007-04-06 05:21:21

First! Wow, thank you, what a terrific audience.

Comment by tg
2007-04-06 06:50:28

another tg?

Comment by auger-inn
2007-04-06 09:32:41

OT. Here is a good overview of a book written by a CIA insider about the impending downfall of the U.S. and how it was created.
http://www.bullnotbull.com/archive/chalmers-1.html

The wife and I just watched “the good shepard” last night so perhaps I’m hyper-sensitive to this CIA thingy. Please read the link though.

Comment by REhobbyist
2007-04-06 10:00:51

Auger, how dare you study history? You must hate America.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ChrisO
2007-04-06 11:10:02

This Chalmers Johnson guy pops up a lot of the left-wing kook sites. I think his hat is thoroughly covered in tinfoil. He was a “CIA insider” in the early ’70s, and a prof at Berkley after that, which tells you all you need to know.

The USA has its share of problems, but so does every other place. What do you think happens to all those East Asian “tigers” once the American credit bubble deflates? Europe is flatlined. Most of the rest of the world beyond that is comparatively primitive and poor.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Gadfly
2007-04-06 16:13:28

Yeah–”kook”! That’s must be what he is. Funny how time has a way of proving these “kooks” right time after time and the neo-cons suddenly develop amnesia and charge after another windmill.
Good luck with that disinformation campaign, though. The radical right has used the ad hominem/attack the messenger propaganda technique so relentlessly that even the pork- rinders are getting hip to it.
Gotta go–have to go watch The Bill O’Really Comedy Hour with my tin foil hat on . . . .

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 18:52:32

Johnson quotes James Madison - the chief author of our Constitution — at length:

Of the enemies of true liberty, war is perhaps the most dreaded because it compromises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. In war, too, the discretionary power of the Executive is extended; its influence in dealing out offices, honors, and emoluments is multiplied; and all the means of seducing the minds are added to those of subduing the force of the people.

“No nation,” Madison concludes, “can preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.” These were his observations over 210 years ago and they remain as valid today.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by REhobbyist
2007-04-06 20:39:07

I have never read that quote, GS. Amen.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by arlingtonva
2007-04-06 05:22:36

Yahoo has teamed up with RealtyTrac to create a new site dedicated to foreclosures:

http://realestate.yahoo.com/Foreclosures

It’s showing that nationwide there were 569,347 foreclosures available and 16,337 in sales. It looks like banks are just holding on to properties.

Comment by geeah
2007-04-06 05:29:44

interesting link… will be fun to follow the avg sales prices here… though i find it very funny that they have a column for “savings” that these buyers got on foreclosed properties.

Comment by Liz & Smudge
2007-04-06 05:54:26

How accurate do you think this actually is? I looked in the town i want to buy and there are many foreclosures listed but im not seeing any huge drops in prices.

Comment by lefantome
2007-04-06 06:38:23

I found one in my area for 377k, with a list date of 2/07…… I thought that was a bit high from what I recalled, and checking the MLS, it’s listed at 318k.

377k was the 2005 wishing price for these. Would never buy one. Ugly and cheap.

http://www.chicorealestate.net/Client/Main/Your_home.aspx?MLS=200700077

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-04-06 06:06:45

From that link: (Thank you Arlington, great site!)
Ten top foreclosure cities:
1. Detroit, Michigan
2. Greeley, Colorado
3. Atlanta, Georgia
4. Fort Worth, Texas
5. Las Vegas, Nevada
6. Vallejo, California
7. Camden, New Jersey
8. Palm Bay, Florida
9. Olympia, Washington
10. Dallas, Texas

Comment by flatffplan
2007-04-06 06:12:45

Atlanta was touted as a booming city for 07-09

 
Comment by txchick57
2007-04-06 06:38:46

WHAT? Both Dallas and Ft. Worth on that list??? But . . . someone said just yesterday here that subprime loans were just 15% in DFW! What’s up with that?

This is just more fuel for my whole theory that DFW is way worse than California or Florida.

Comment by JP
2007-04-06 06:50:59

DFW is way worse

By which metric? I would’ve guessed that the dollar-volume title will go to CA.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2007-04-06 07:06:09

Will have larger percentage losses, more losses and foreclosures in absolute numbers, will recover much more slowly, and will take a much larger hit to the overall economy.

 
 
Comment by SD to DFW Underwriter
2007-04-06 09:38:35

txchick57,

I said the percentage of stated/no doc loans that I U/W (in DFW) were only 15% over the past 2 years. Compared to when I was in CA: the run up was from 10% in 1998 to 50% by the end of 2004.

If you go back and look at F/C figures for the past 2 years DFW has been high on the list. So this is not a change in the market.

Properties go to F/C must quicker here in Texas then in any other state due to the state laws.

Normal F/C reasons are job loss, divorce and death/Illness - in Texas you have the new home builder’s in-house lenders approving borrower on the “non-improved” property value:

$100,000 new house having the taxes set at 3% of the $15,000 raw land value = taxes of $450 due every year (qualified them $37.50 per month) - when it should be: $3000 (or $250.00 per month for qualification purposes)

The borrowers have a rude awaking when their new tax bills arrive 11-23 months later and they have to pay the correct rate and make up the short fall: as much as $5500 but at least $3250. (On a $100,000 home)

If they don’t pay the past due tax bill then the mortgage servicier is notified and pays the tax bill to cover their lien position. Their monthly payment goes up from $450 to $700 a month and they can not make the payments.

This is puts many FTHBs in into F/C status when their loan is past due 30+ days.

I am proud to say that my company always qualifies the borrower on the improved value of the subject property and if the loan is impounded sets the impounds to the correct level. We don’t have any cases of the borrower going into F/C due to the tax bill surprises 13-23 months out.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scprofessor
2007-04-06 10:26:17

Yep, Texas, the State with the 21 day foreclosure. Amazing. But don’t worry. If it is your residence you get an additional 30 days. Damn, that’s faster than we can evict tenants here in California…….

 
 
Comment by SD to DFW Underwriter
2007-04-06 09:42:31

txchick57,

We also miss El Torito as well, (Corn cakes)– We enjoy Cal-Mex much more then Tex-Mex.

I can’t find a Manchaca burrito anywhere in Collin County.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by the_voz
2007-04-06 10:40:36

At least you recognize the difference.
Tex-Mex=crispy chilli Relleno, best of the lot
Cali-Mex=Rubios fish tacos, there is no equal

 
Comment by redhead68
2007-04-06 11:39:20

Rubio’s fish tacos…yum! I had forgotten all about Rubio’s when I lived on the east coast. I was thrilled when we happened upon one in Highland’s Ranch, Colorado.

 
Comment by hllnwlz
2007-04-07 10:11:38

You guys are on CRACK. Haven’t you actually had Mexican fish tacos? One buck, and they beat Rubio’s by a country mile. People, Mexico RULES, especialmente si habla espanol. But don’t ask me which stands are the best. I NEVER give out that secret. ; )

 
 
Comment by SD to DFW Underwriter
2007-04-06 10:11:25

Txchick57,

What I said yesterday was that from 98-04 the percentage of stated doc loans I U/W went from 10% to 50% in CA. Over the past two years the percentage of loans I U/W in DFW that were stated /no doc are 15% and holding steady.

F/C law in TX allows a home to have an NOD filed after 35 days dlq, while in CA it is 65 days. This makes a big difference in the overall number of NODs filed.

When I moved to DFW just over 2 years ago it was very high if not leading the F/C list nationally.

You have 3 main causes for F/C in the past; Job loss, divorce, death/illness, add arm and I/O resets to this list in the future, but we have another factor in Texas as well:

New home builder’s in-house lenders approve and set up loans for the borrowers using the non-improved tax value on the land.

I am proud to say that the company I work for qualifies and sets up escrow accounts on the sales price value.

The problem is:

$100,000 home at 3% tax rate is $3000 tax bill a year but if you use the non-improved tax value of $15,000 then the tax bill shows up as $450. The set up escrows and qualify the borrower on the $450 year figure.

In 11-23 months the borrower receives a tax bill that jumps from $450 a year to $3250 or as high as $5550: all due right now. They can’t pay the county; the mortgage company pays it to protect their lien position and increases the monthly payment by $450 to $700.

That throws many FTHB into F/C in Texas.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2007-04-06 07:45:35

Greeley gets its Andy Warhol moment. Greeley is also the city that Michener used to model “Centennial”.

Greeley apparently was one of the fastest growing small cities in the country. This growth was fueled primarily by the influx of illegals. One of Greeley’s few quality employers, HP, closed shop about 4 years ago (what was left of it was moved to Fort Collins). So here’s the formula:

(Lots of low wage workers) + (liar loans) = muchos foreclosures

Comment by palmetto
2007-04-06 08:05:21

“Lots of low wage workers) + (liar loans) = muchos foreclosures”

Testify! I heard or read something recently (can’t recall where) that illegals are leaving Colorado in droves because of lack of work, now that the construction jobs are drying up. Anyone know if that’s true? And if so, where are they going?

I was thinking yesterday about all this illegal immigration and was sort of struck by the fact that it is really nothing new, when you consider that populations have migrated to and from various areas since time immemorial. Back in the day, they were looking for better hunting grounds or planting grounds. These illegals are descendents of those same migrants. Now it is migration for jobs, but still on foot in many cases. Way back in time, they migrated over the land bridge in the Arctic.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Wickedheart
2007-04-06 09:09:51

” I heard or read something recently (can’t recall where) that illegals are leaving Colorado in droves because of lack of work, now that the construction jobs are drying up. ”

Well, you can’t live in the bushes in Colorado. My guess is they are probably headed for sunny SoCal.

 
Comment by REhobbyist
2007-04-06 09:27:51

I think you’re right, Wickedheart. Some activist small towns in the south and northeast are passing local anti-illegal legislation. What illegal worker is going to hang around in small town Pennsylvania like a sitting duck? It’s a lot easier to blend in in California, and there’s more tolerance for it by the state/local governments, who would be overwhelmed if they tried to stop it.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2007-04-06 09:55:55

There is still a lot of commercial construction going on in Larimer and Weld counties (Chad McWhinney could sell sand in the Sahara).

Also, there is a lot of agribusiness in Weld county, especially meat packing. Anyone remember when those used to be good paying, union jobs? Now they are low pating jobs “that Americans won’t do”.

It will be interesting to see where construction industry illegals will eventually end up. FWIW, thay are less visiblethese days at the Loveland WalMart. My guess is that they will try to displace Americans out of other low and semi skilled jobs. We had dinner at Mimi’s the other day and the workforce breakdown was predictable:

Wait staff: Blond, blue eyed gringos
All others (cooks, bus boys): I’ll give you 3 guesses.

 
 
 
Comment by Lou Minatti
2007-04-06 09:13:04

D/FW should be treated as one geographic area since it is one metro region. The foreclosure numbers for Dallas and Fort Worth should be combined, and if they were D/FW would I think rank at the top.

Just like the rest of Texas: No appreciation + stupid lending + borrowers with lower incomes = foreclosure tidal wave. It’s just that our tsunami won’t be as spectacular as California’s as it crashes ashore.

Comment by ChrisO
2007-04-06 11:15:58

Well, Vallejo Calif. is just a small part of the Bay Area. I imagine total foreclosures in the Bay Area are substantial, since it is a huge area. Regardless of how one measures it, the fact that Texas cities rank in the top 10 is surprising to me, since Texas seems to have had less “frothiness” than Calif. or Fla.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by REhobbyist
2007-04-06 09:23:30

I wonder what statistics are used to calculate the top ten cities - it wasn’t obvious. Foreclosure homes as a percentage of total listings? Number of foreclosures per number of total number of homes in the area?

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 06:46:53

16K sales versus 569K foreclosures — wow! It looks like the lenders (or whoever holds the bag on bankrupt lenders’ collateral) are waiting for their blue state candidates in Congress to push through one of their bailout proposals. I hope the REO holders are not deprived of the same lesson in market discipline that the foreclosed borrowers just endured.

 
Comment by Incredulous
2007-04-06 07:05:46

This one is a lot better and more up-to-date than foreclosure.com, but many of the little side maps showing locations are wrong.

Comment by sm_landlord
2007-04-06 08:10:26

I’ll bet they are wrong on purpose. They want you to sign up with RealtyTrack to find the exact locations.

Comment by DC in LBV
2007-04-06 09:05:14

I have found in Florida I can find the address and sales info by searching the county property appraisers records by year built and square footage from realtytrac. Once I have the address and owners name, a quick records search at the count clerk of court site will show how much the note they defaulted on.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Neil
2007-04-06 08:41:26

Arlington,

Great link. I love the graphs.

I’ve already forwarded the link.

Sadly, one of my relatives has gone on the warpath to pressure to buy! Quoting every Gary Watts quote you could imagine. I finally told her that she asked for my advice, we disagree on the trend, and its her money. Her responsibility.

got popcorn?
Neil

Comment by Chrisusc
2007-04-06 12:08:02

Neil,

agreed, at this point in the game, if someone wants to still believe in the tooth fairy, then more power to em. I just keep my comments to myself and shop for more popcorn…

 
 
Comment by oc-ed
2007-04-06 09:03:53

Has anyone used RealtyTrac and/or Foreclosure.com? Is it actually worth the costs or is the same info available elsewhere for free? I see there are listings on yahoo that are not on foreclosure.com. What gives?

 
Comment by Ken Best
2007-04-06 13:08:26

“It looks like banks are just holding on to properties”

until they unload all their stocks and buy puts.

 
Comment by seattle price drop
2007-04-06 16:00:03

That is one awesome link.

I was kind of shocked to see a few homes on there that were listed all last year on the MLS with their wishing prices. Two of them were even the front page features on the glossy little free RE books that are in every grocery store, etc.

A few are on the MLS right now at grossly higher “asking prices” than are indicated on the Yahoo site.

Which kind of PROVES that if you’re out there low-balling, you may strike pay dirt. One is on the MLS for @ 500K, on Yahoo for 180K. Another was on the MLS for 180K, on Yahoo for 55K.

As I’ve suspected, minus 50% is not gonna cut it. These places were way more out of touch with fundamentals than that.

Another shocker is that Olympia , WA. is in the top 10 for foreclosures nationwide. State capitol and not a bad town for those not familiar. We certainly have not heard a peep out of the MSM up here on *that* bit of news!

 
 
Comment by ByeByeFL
2007-04-06 05:23:58

Foreclosure location of the Day: Los Angeles County:

http://www.foreclosure.com/search.html?st=CA&cno=037&z=&tab=f

http://www.foreclosure.com/search.html?st=CA&cno=037&z=&tab=p

Ouch! Thank you may I have another.

 
 
Comment by Michael Fink
2007-04-06 05:32:43

Job report, up 180,000 jobs.

Surpising. However, this should keep the talk about an IR cut quiet for a little while.

Comment by flatffplan
2007-04-06 05:55:52

construction workers are illegals( not recorded) RE ,mort are 1099
so when they get cut they become “employeed” at crappy jobs

Comment by ByeByeFL
2007-04-06 06:24:20

Bingo!

 
Comment by spike66
2007-04-06 06:45:03

Lots of mortgage brokers, real estate agents are 1099s–so they don’t show up in the stats either.

 
Comment by jim A
2007-04-06 07:31:42

I’ve tried to popularize the term “self-unemployed” for those working on commisxion and making no sales.

 
Comment by But_Im_Not_Dead_Yet
2007-04-06 09:35:47

I’m sorry, but I am ignorant on the whole issue of how the BLS calculates employment numbers. Maybe someone can enlighten me? What are you referring to here with the “1099s” comment. Are you saying that mortgage brokers and RE agents are not being included?

I thought (do not know) that the BLS calculated its numbers via business surveys that they conduct. They also adjust these numbers for people who are self-employed (RE agents would fall in here wouldn’t they?) Someone please correct me if I’m wrong.

My other understanding is that the BLS does NOT use state unemployment numbers in its calculations. Again, someone please correct me if I’m wrong.

I have two concerns here. ONE: I do not trust the BLS numbers, if they are making all of these “adjustments” to try to account for self-employed people. Also, I read this morning that they calculated where Construction hiring actually INCREASED by 56,000 in the month of March. With everything we are seeing going on here with foreclosures being up, housing starts being way down, inventories at record levels, this does not make sense to me.

TWO: I also do not trust the unemployment claims figures as published by the states. These are reported separately each month, aggregated once the states have completed their reporting. They usually quote these as “first time unemployment claims”. Well, I know for a fact that the state I live in (Wisconsin) uses a very conservative method of reporting “first time claims”. In my case, I finished a temp job (I know, my life sucks) back in May of last year and filed for unemployment for the first time in several years. So, I hit the ledger as a “first time claim” for the last week of May. I was off for 5 weeks, then completed a series of assignments that took me to the end of December. I re-filed for unemployment the first week of January of this year, but when I did that they “reopened” my old claim from May/June, meaning that I did NOT get counted as a “first time claim” in December. In other words, I think they are fudging their numbers.

I do not claim to be an expert on any of this, so it is very possible that my understanding of some of the finer points is incorrect. If anyone can enlighten me on how these BLS numbers are compiled (or point me to a web-site that explains it) it would be greatly appreciated. I’ve tried the BLS web-site but quite frankly don’t understand some of the methodologies they are discussing there (birth/death adjustments, etc.). Thanks…

Comment by Chrisusc
2007-04-06 12:10:39

You know they also told us a few months ago that auto jobs were up, manwhile at the same time the big three were shuttering 14 major plants. So I think you have answered you own question in terms of whether the numbers are accurate or not. IMHO.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Chrisusc
2007-04-06 12:11:11

manwhile = meanwhile

 
 
Comment by Chrisusc
2007-04-06 12:15:29

As well, you may remeber that many on this blog called foul when back in January, they announced the job numbers for fourth quarter. They were announced as representative of still strong growth in the economy, even though they almost entirely consisted of temp jobs for the Christmas season. Adn those that weren’t temp jobs, were call center type jobs, low on the pay scale. So they dont take those temp jobs numbers out and only count “real” jobs during that period each year. So there is just one major instance of the jobs numbers being off base.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by AKRon
2007-04-06 19:35:53

Hi,
I am fairly certain that the unemployment numbers are based on the CPS (Current Population Survey), which is a huge survey of households. I think 60,000 households are surveyed each year, household surveys repeated at 12 month intervals to see what changes have occurred. What is critical is how the survey defines unemployment- you can be severely underemployed and still count as employed. When you talk about surveying businesses, that is the Establishment Survey, which is used, unsurprisingly, to describe the characteristics of businesses, not to gauge unemployment.
I one analyzed several years of CPS data (I was estimating estimated lifetime incomes as a function of present pay and age)- the survey itself is huge, very well designed. The values are adjusted a bit to make the proportions of different subgroups in the sample weighted according to their proportions in the census. The government, however, does keep changing the definition of unemployed to make everything seem rosier.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by But_Im_Not_Dead_Yet
2007-04-06 09:42:07

Another follow up question that just occurred to me: The BLS web-site says that someone is counted as “employed” during a period if they received any pay during that period (from that employer). Is it not possible that there are potentially HUGE discrepancies in their number then caused by people who change jobs?

For example, in early December I was finishing up a job for one agency I work for. If the BLS (or the state agencies) happened to call that company for their employment count, they would have included me.

Then, I went to work for a different agency where I finished out the month of December. Again, if the BLS had contacted THAT agency, I would have been included AGAIN. So, based on their methodology, aren’t they introducing a potentially HUGE margin of error for people who are changing jobs (going from one employer to another)?

Again, all comments are appreciated….

Comment by REhobbyist
2007-04-06 10:09:29

I would guess that 1099 employees would be included in the “employed” numbers. US government unemployment figures are based on surveys, but in reading about unemployment I have never seen the actual questions used in the survey.

Not-Dead: You’re right about huge theoretical inaccuracies in employment reporting. I find it hard to believe that unemployment has been historically low for ten years now, but two presidents in a row love to tout these numbers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2007-04-06 11:47:45

My understanding is that the survey consists of two questions:

1) Are you employed in any manner (self employment counts)
2) If not, are you looking for a job.

If you answer ‘no’ to #2, then you don’t count, then you are not counted as part of the labor market. This is done to not include people like students, retirees, homemakers, etc. as unemployed.

 
Comment by AKRon
2007-04-06 19:45:48

Actually the survey covers a HUGE list of questions.

A general description of the CPS and how unemployment rates are calculated is
http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm

 
Comment by REhobbyist
2007-04-06 20:48:51

Thank you AKRon. At least I know how unemployment is defined and measured by the government now.

 
Comment by AKRon
2007-04-06 22:01:47

Actually, if one has a lot of time and some data base skills, the CPS is a goldmine of information about what is going on in the U.S.- I used to get the data on CD-ROMs but it might be downloadable now. It is a well-designed study with 60,000 households in a cohort, surveyed 4 months in a row, then a year later the same cohort is surveyed another 4 months. Questions are extensive (and don’t change much from year to year), and the interviewers well-trained. You can really get a superb snapshot of what is going on with the vast majority of workers.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Hoz
2007-04-06 06:43:02

I apologize if this has been posted before. This is an important article Alan Blinder, architect of the offshoring movement , NAFTA etc. has changed his spots. It is an excellent read.

Offshoring: The Next Industrial Revolution?
Alan S. Blinder

“…To obtain a ballpark figure of the number of U.S. jobs threatened by offshoring, consider the composition of the U.S. labor market at the end of 2004. There were 14.3 million manufacturing jobs. The vast majority of those workers produced items that could be put in a box, and so virtually all of their jobs were potentially movable offshore. …

The overall picture defies generalization, but a rough estimate, based on the preceding numbers, is that the total number of current U.S. service-sector jobs that will be susceptible to offshoring in the electronic future is two to three times the total number of current manufacturing jobs (which is about 14 million). That said, large swaths of the U.S. labor market look to be immune. But, of course, no one knows exactly what technological changes the future will bring….

Changing trade patterns will keep most personal-service jobs at home while many jobs producing goods and impersonal services migrate to the developing world. When you add to that the likelihood that the demand for many of the increasingly costly personal services is destined to shrink relative to the demand for ever-cheaper impersonal services and manufactured goods, rich countries are likely to have some major readjustments to make. One of the adjustments will involve reallocating labor from one industry to another. But another will show up in real wages. As more and more rich-country workers seek employment in personal services, real wages for those jobs are likely to decline, unless the offset from rising demand is strong enough. …

In the United States, job-market stress up to now has been particularly acute for the uneducated and the unskilled, who are less inclined to exercise their political voice and less adept at doing so. But the new cadres of displaced workers, especially those who are drawn from the upper educational reaches, will be neither as passive nor as quiet. They will also be numerous. …

Contrary to current thinking, Americans, and residents of other English-speaking countries, should be less concerned about the challenge from China, which comes largely in manufacturing, and more concerned about the challenge from India, which comes in services. India is learning to exploit its already strong comparative advantage in English, and that process will continue. …”

Foreign Affairs Mar/Apr 2006
http://tinyurl.com/ytm8ow

Comment by spike66
2007-04-06 06:48:41

Let’s see, with 2.2 million forclosures forecast, and millions more “middle class” Americans likely to lose their jobs to offshoring, and forced to find what work there is in the (much) lower paid service sector…gee, Alan, sounds like a recipe for social and political upheaval, if not disaster. Your country thanks you for looking out for your fellow Americans.

Comment by Jerry
2007-04-06 12:29:29

looking out for Americians… don’t worry. The rest of the world will “catch up” with us. Remember we had the federal reserve first as printing money as fast as they could and loaning it out as fast as they could. We just unleashed our greenbacks first and flooded the economy with them. America bankers are the smartest and the greed for Wall St. was there. The rest of the world just takes a little longer to catch up. They will.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2007-04-06 07:01:46

Hoz, just want to say that I really enjoy your posts and your perspective on matters related to the economy and the housing bubble. Mind if I ask if you have a finace background, or are just an interested observer?

Comment by Hoz
2007-04-06 09:21:14

I was raised in northern Wisconsin, got very lucky and got a scholarship to a decent Pac 8 school in Palo Alto. I was a dual major in Biology and Neuro-chemistry, minors in middle English and economics.

I took a job in SF (should have gone to UC Davis - agriculture, alas - my only regret). I was making more money trading stocks at lunch hour than I was making as a scientist tech. My stock broker suggested I try trading for a living. I bought a seat on the Pacific Stock Exchange and went to work. I got incredibly lucky, a year later I bought a seat in Chicago on the CBOT. I grew up with corn, beans and cows. I loved being back in the midwest!! My parental units still kept the farm up north.

When I came down to the floor of the CBOT, corn traded within 1/4 of 1 cent for the entire year. A year later corn had a $0.75 range in a month. The economics I learned at Leland Stanford Jr. were no longer applicable for a changing economy. I lost my shirt, pants and underwear. By necessity (not wishing to look for a real job), I read economic books - still do. I read every stock, commodity, option trading book written. I tried to make sense of the disconnect between reality in the corn fields and prices on Lasalle St. I got very, very lucky.

There is a field of economy that is not extensively studied in the US, in practice this field has been used to study micro economic situations. I personally believe this theory can be employed as well for macro economic situations. Not enough work has been done.

The field was developed after the Allais Paradox was formulated to counter game theory. The field is called “cognitive economics” . The field is attempting to “integrate economic theory and a few results of cognitive sciences.”
An example is “real estate always goes up”, we have heard this blather all our lives. According to “cognitive economics theory” no matter how much information is presented to an individual preconceived notions will be the operative decision making process. Information that can be assimilated becomes knowledge, decisions are based on knowledge. If information cannot be assimilated, knowledge does not change = bad decisions.

In the middle ages an esne would go a few miles in his whole life, he had one place to buy goods. The ‘Sears’ of the time were the fairs. Then the Renaissance opened a whole new brand of stores, individual shop owners as well as fairs. Selection galore. Primitive K Marts.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2007-04-06 09:56:13

Fantastic post, Hoz. The “cognitive economics” theory is something that makes complete sense and this bubble, as well as others, are wonderful real life demonstrations of that theory. It seems you bring your knowledge and experience to your commentary on various bubble phenomena, must be why I enjoy the posts. Keep up the good work.

 
Comment by sf jack
2007-04-06 10:46:33

“According to ‘cognitive economics theory’ no matter how much information is presented to an individual preconceived notions will be the operative decision making process. Information that can be assimilated becomes knowledge, decisions are based on knowledge. If information cannot be assimilated, knowledge does not change = bad decisions.”

*******

“… information cannot be assimilated.”

That could be stamped on some foreheads locally and explains the behavior of the cognitive dissonant types here in the “Alt-A Bay Area”.

Unfortunately, many have already made bad decisions, especially with regard to housing (simple rent vs. buy calculations were not assimilated, etc.).

 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-04-06 12:44:59

IMO, we have to all look at ourselves as residents of a planet, not as citizens of a particular nation. Shed the collectivism. After that, consider that you should buy the products you want that are the lowest cost and highest quality, no matter where they are produced. Otherwise you put your own head on the chopping block. If some shmoe 10,000 miles away does my job better than me at a lower cost, that’s my problem, and I think it is pure weakness to try to get government to secure my job. I had that view for over ten years now. The handwriting was on the wall. It said “world free trade.” It forced me to save for my own personal turmoil that may occur should I lose my career and have to downsize. I’m up for any change. In turn, the larger markets are more exciting and challenging rather than flabby and dull. A real man qua man loves to be challenged and to be encouraged to outsmart the market. BTW: I’m 47 years old.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2007-04-06 22:41:45

IMO we are tribal by nature. Sure we can fling our borders wide open to immigration and trade. A great recipe for Balkanization and trillion dollar trade deficits if you ask me.

IMO the only people who win in the Globalization Game are the billionaires.

 
Comment by CA renter
2007-04-07 03:45:23

Bill,

Should we not consider quality of life/environmental issues? If we are all just “residents of a planet” then why not just move to Zimbabwe or China or Brazil or???

The truth is, we should strive to bring the developing nations up to our standards, not bring ourselves down to their level.

I like living in a relatively safe, secure, clean environment. It’s also nice to believe that we can strive toward having a corruption-free government (not there, but we should be working on it).

If you like living in third-world conditions, why not move to a third-world country instead of trying to decimate the US?

 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-04-07 08:53:54

I’m going to investigate Costa Rica in a few years. I found some very reasonable apartments for rent in San Jose. How about $350 for a 2 bedroom? I’ve been to Mexico a few times. Far enough from the American border I have always found the locals warm, welcome, and hard working. I’m not going to move completely out of the US, but I would like to reside in Central America or the Carribean. Many years ago, about 1989 I had a segment stop in Guadalajara. The population at that time was 2,000,000 people. I was told at that time 200,000 Americans live there. You can live very cheap outside the U.S. and not have to be a landowner.

 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2007-04-06 10:33:59

WE DO NOT TEACH OUR KIDS ENGLISH in schools anymore,

its ALL GHETTO ALL THE TIME

This is the main reaon I hate the current rap and hip hop music, it created “THE MORON GENERATION”….and now the fallout :

India is learning to exploit its already strong comparative advantage in English, and that process will continue. …”

 
 
Comment by cactus
Comment by In Colorado
2007-04-06 07:51:31

I love how they spin the good news. Of course if one is underemployed (like my next door neighbor who was layed off from IBM and tries to make a living as a wedding photographer) or has simply given up trying to find work, one counts as “employed”.

Comment by stockmarketguru
2007-04-06 09:26:45

The unemployment number is crap, as once your benefits are up after 6 months - 1 year, you are no longer unemployed by government statistics…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Chrisusc
2007-04-06 12:19:54

The real question is: how many of the jobs being created actually pay wages above poverty ($40,000 or more). Answer: probably not many.

 
 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 07:19:33

Strong labor market, surging gas, T-bond yields and gold prices… the signs of increasing inflationary pressures are in place. The Fed is between a rock and a hard place; if they stand pat, it will be interpreted as a de facto policy of letting inflation ramp up, but if the tighten, they can increase the chances of catching blame for the foreclosure crisis.

Comment by combotechie
2007-04-06 07:57:27

The FED is supposed to be the bad guy, the guy who takes away the punchbowl when the party gets going, the meanie who always says “No!” when the great unwashed masses gets carried away with their craziness. People aren’t supposed to like the FED; A FED that is well liked is a FED not doing its job.

Lots of people liked Alan Greenspan. Alan always came to the rescue when others screwed up. They even named a financial insurance policy after Alan known as “The Greenspan Put”.

Ben Bernake may not be as nice a guy as Alan Greenspan. Ben just may fool us all. Folks call him “Helicopter Ben” because of a speech he gave some years ago implying he would become a softy if hard decisions were called for.

He just may act to lose the “Helicoptor” nickname and have it replaced with one rhyming with “Basshole”. That’s when we’ll know that we have a good man at the FED.

We’ll just have to wait and see. (And I suspect the wait won’t be very long.)

Comment by palmetto
2007-04-06 08:09:56

Surely you’re not implying he could become the next Paul Volcker? That would be amazing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sf jack
2007-04-06 10:49:25

I say: “‘Do the Volcker’ and drain the liquidity cesspool!”

 
Comment by combotechie
2007-04-06 10:54:30

At this point we just don’t know. BB hasn’t been tested (yet).

I learned long ago that the perceived position a politician carries gives him liscense to move in the other direction.

When Nixon reopened relations with China everyone was astounded. That’s because Nixon made a career out of being a rabid anti-communist. The irony was, only Nixon could have pulled this China thing off BECAUSE he had this anti-communist reputation. Anyone else doing so would have become suspect.

BB has the helicopter nickname to live down. Everyone expects him to be a soft money type of guy (despite his words to the contrary) so that gives him a liscense, as well as an obligation, to prove otherwise.

 
Comment by the_voz
2007-04-06 11:34:19

Who among the leadership has the fortitude to lead this county out of this credit mess. Tighten short term rates, to help stem the inflation tide, and you are screwed politically. I just do not think BB has the fortitude for such an action.

Who has the charisma, knowledge base, and WILL to stand up and say, America is in trouble, and we need to help ourselves out of a terrible mess, and it begins with tightening the belt …. Fat Lazy Stupid Americans love the IDEA of an expensive house, showy car, all flash and no substance.

Perhaps this is better suited to a weekend topic, but who, on either side of the aisle can bring this idea to the table, and get it done….. I say none. Everybody wants to be the good guy/gal, the guy who helped us out of a bad situation by spending MORE money, not LESS. Less is un-American, solutions come through MORE money, MORE jobs, MORE, MORE, MORE…… this is the problem. Sometimes the solution isn’t more, sometimes it’s actually less.

If these guys were my kids they would be in for a serious spanking when I got home from work. Yeah, I spank, it isn’t fashionable, but guess what, it works.

 
 
 
Comment by WAman
2007-04-06 08:10:58

Can you say Stagflation?

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 18:55:43

US jobless rate hits six-year low

By Eoin Callan in Washington and Richard Beales in New York

Published: April 6 2007 14:22 | Last updated: April 7 2007 00:30

The US unemployment rate fell to an historic low last month, according to government figures, triggering a plunge in bond prices during a holiday-shortened trading session on Wall Street.

Investors abandoned bets that the Federal Reserve would be forced to cut interest rates after figures showed employers created far more jobs than Wall Street expected last month, while the unemployment rate fell to 4.4 per cent – the lowest level in nearly six years.

ADVERTISEMENT

The steady job creation underlines the Fed’s view that rising prices in a tight labour market pose a greater risk to the economy than a sudden slowdown due to the housing slump.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/b0940bbc-e440-11db-bf06-000b5df10621.html

 
 
Comment by WAman
2007-04-06 07:22:26

I do not believe these numbers at all! 54k new jobs in education and healthcare in March? Schools do not hire many people in March. Most if not all of eduction hiring is done in late spring into summer. I think that the government cooked the books. They are trying every trick they can to prop up this economy as they know that housing is dragging us into a recession. Look at the earnings of Home Depot and Lowes as indicators of economic activity.

Comment by ragerunner
2007-04-06 07:28:12

I have got to agree. Something is up. I can think of no education area that would be on such a hiring spree at this time of year.

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 07:35:53

“I think that the government cooked the books.”

Not sure how you can ever check this. But I will mention that a couple of days back, I suggested the plan at the top will be to suppress any evidence of a recession (which normally accompanies a real estate bust) until after the 2008 election season…

Comment by combotechie
2007-04-06 09:27:52

Not sure anyone can suppress evidence of a recession for nineteen months which is how long it is until the next election.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Chrisusc
2007-04-06 12:24:32

Agreed. It would be very tough. The only thing they could do would be to lower rates once or twice, then become the bad guys after the election is over.

 
 
Comment by albrt
2007-04-06 12:30:16

Dick Cheney is still saying Saddam Hussein was behind Osama Bin Laden. The NASA inspector general was suppressing safety information about the space shuttle. The Supreme Court had to tell the EPA that CO2 is potentially harmful. And that’s just the news from this week.

Why would anybody expect this government’s employment statistics to have any relationship to reality?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2007-04-06 07:55:27

I also do not believe the wage numbers either. Month after month they trot out numbers that would indicate that everyone is getting 4-6% annual raises. I don’t know ANYONE who got more than 2% in the private sector (outside of healthcare).

In fact, where I work (a company famous for it printers) we were told by management that cost of living raises are no more.

Comment by oliviacw
2007-04-06 08:36:47

And the average raise this year at my company (a very large tech manufacturer) was 3%.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2007-04-06 10:01:47

Count your blessings. Our average increase was 2%.

 
Comment by redhead68
2007-04-06 11:45:21

My spouse, who worked for a large gov’t contractor got 2% last fall, and his was the largest of the department, according to his boss. Most got 1%. Deduct the increase in healthcare insurance, and his salary actually decreased in 2006. He decided he’d had enough and found a new employer. We’ll see how things go this year.

 
Comment by redhead68
2007-04-06 11:52:11

Addendum…

He worked with a bunch of no-good slackers, so they were lucky to get 1%. They deserved nothing. His coworkers sat on their butts all day and expected a nice raise, while he took on more and more work.

I think all of them missed the idea that a raise isn’t a reward for the work you’re already supposed to be doing, it’s incentive for the work you are expected to take on in the future.

You want a raise? Stop complaining and get to work proving your worth it.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2007-04-06 15:19:11

FWIW, productivity has soared in the US, and the record profits are the proof of the pudding. I know a lot of people who work very hard, way more than the standard 40 hours per week (we’re talking salaried people, so no OT pay) who get 1% raises.

 
Comment by redhead68
2007-04-06 15:46:10

“I know a lot of people who work very hard, way more than the standard 40 hours per week (we’re talking salaried people, so no OT pay) who get 1% raises.”

Absolutely true. I was just venting about the employees at my spouse’s former company. Don’t take it personally.

 
 
Comment by But_Im_Not_Dead_Yet
2007-04-06 09:51:29

Yeah, but if you factor into the averages the hourly wage increase that your CEO got last year, well, you get the picture….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by patient renter
2007-04-06 10:13:02

Agreed, and ditto to what oliviacw said.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by But_Im_Not_Dead_Yet
2007-04-06 09:55:07

Also, retailers added 36k jobs in March. Hmmm, let’s see… Consumer spending is soft, yet Retailers are adding to the payrolls. Makes sense to me….

Comment by But_Im_Not_Dead_Yet
2007-04-06 10:06:37

Also, piggybacking on the comment earlier that 54k “Education and Health Services” jobs were created. In addition, 23,000 government jobs were created.

Aren’t MOST education jobs ALSO government jobs???? In my state, they are: primary and secondary education, tech schools, and all but a handful of the universities are government jobs.

Is it possible they are counting jobs as being “created” when job offers are extended? There are probably quite a few teaching positions being created right now due to job offers going out to May grads. But I wouldn’t think these would count as “employed”…

I am having difficulty coming to grips with these numbers….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by patient renter
2007-04-06 10:15:36

As an anecdote, March saw my wife being laid off from her teaching position, along with over half of the teachers in her school district. It’s actually an annual ritual where they layoff everyone who is not tenured until mid-to-late summer when they hire back only what they need and can afford.

Comment by REhobbyist
2007-04-06 16:18:18

For the first five years that my husband taught school he received the same notice. He was really scared the first time. If the previous poster is correct, an employee who was threatened with, but not actually laid off, would be counted as employed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Sniggle
2007-04-06 05:40:16

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=587489
More in state face loss of homes
Foreclosure filings up 19% so far this year

“April’s going to be a real big kicker. That’s when the subprimes of spring 2004 go up” as these high-priced loans’ teaser interest rates expire, said Gary Zimmermann, national director of Federal Housing Administration lending for CFIC Home Mortgage. He’s based in Waukesha, and his company, in St. Petersburg, Fla.

Comment by Sniggle
2007-04-06 05:44:39

‘Foreclosure properties are hitting metro Milwaukee steadily enough to keep housing prices from rising, Vozar and Scholtka said.’

More properly stated, the comment would be ‘foreclosure are accelerating the decline in housing prices’

 
 
Comment by oxide
2007-04-06 05:45:14

Anybody got any skinny on western Columbus, OH? I’m tentatively thinking to buy there Spring 2008.

And is it just me, or is Realtor.com way overpriced?

Comment by flatffplan
2007-04-06 06:14:38

you’ll live like a king.
looks lime a decent house is 200K

 
Comment by HoustonStan
2007-04-06 06:46:05

You ask a “housing bubble” blog if something is way overpriced?

Nah, It is you. RE is a bargain now. You should know by now that real estate always goes up. :)

Comment by oxide
2007-04-06 07:11:51

I would be a relatively young first-time buyer, so I never had a good handle on what houses should cost. And this bubble has skewed everything out of proportion. I knew Realtor.com was high, but not how high.
For example, what would be a “normal” price for a 3/2 1200 sq ft 1/5 acre built before 1995? Because there is NO WAY I’m buying a cookie cutter in a sardine can which built only as a profit vehicle.

Comment by bluto
2007-04-06 07:35:06

There’s not really a houses should cost X that is true for everywhere. Good rules of thumb are a home should be priced at 100-120x montly rents or about 3x-4x prevailing incomes in an area, with perhaps a 10-30% premium (to the latter) for things like coastal/waterfront, city light views, or proximity to mass transit. Rents would typically be higher as well in those areas. Below those ratios and housing purchases look more favorable, above that and they look less favorable.
That’s not to say that you’ll make money on a purchase below that price, or that you’ll lose above those guidlines.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by samk
2007-04-06 07:53:37

“with perhaps a 10-30% premium (to the latter) for things like city light views”

Really? I ‘d pay a premium to get away from that.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Mole Man
2007-04-06 10:10:05

Columbus is an example of how the market can be complicated. There are many different neighborhoods making up the city, and some like Germantown have a very different dynamic than the rest. Westside has historically been more hardscrabble and industrial than most of town. Overall, Columbus has seen better economic performance and growth that most other parts of Ohio which is seeing difficulties statewide. And then, of course, there is the bubble which magnifies everything.

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2007-04-06 05:46:04

New York Has a Good quality of living….Expensive but good…

Also thats to Giuliani, the riff raff has mostly been told to go elsewhere. Like New Rochelle, which used to be a nice area 20 years ago.

You actually feel safe to walk home from the subways late at night.

Oh and the famous John Rocker comment about the 7 train in queens….YES in the 1980’s-90’s it was the most dangerous train to take home, the graffiti the boom boxes, etc, they had to put police on the 7 train for the Mets games but not anymore..

But its realy priced out for anyone who does any real work for a living. Whcih makes this city i think one of the most Immoblie towns i’ve ever lived in….

It really staggering how many people live in the same apartment 20-30-40+ years because its still far cheaper to rent then to buy, but they have owned homes elesewhere.

 
Comment by Left LA Behind
2007-04-06 05:52:26

As if Florida does not have enough problems:

In a Break From the Past, Florida Will Let Felons Vote
By ABBY GOODNOUGH
Published: April 6, 2007
Gov. Charlie Crist said it was time for Florida to leave the “offensive minority” of states that uniformly deny ex-offenders voting rights.

http://tinyurl.com/3ydy9p

Comment by ByeByeFL
2007-04-06 06:05:42

Shit, if non felons can put Bush in office, then these ex crooks should be given a chance a voting. LOL

 
Comment by Michael Fink
2007-04-06 06:22:48

Honestly, hopefully the felons can do better then the citizens have so far. The fact that these looters in govt here can get voted in year after year is just shocking.

It’s just resistence to change; how can we let these crooks continue to run our counties/cities. And, I don’t meen “crook” in the typical politican since of the word. I mean “crook”! Stealing money from public coffers, bribes, etc.

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-04-06 06:25:38

Since Florida has convicted and sentenced people for “moral crimes” and the “vast majority black” have been disenfranchised, it is about time the state started to do positive changes.

Comment by palmetto
2007-04-06 07:09:35

Exactly. If someone has done their time and paid their debt to society, provided they are not murderers or sex offenders or violent felons, they should be admitted back to society. If you believe people can change and people can be rehabilitated, I say, let ‘em vote.

 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfruede
2007-04-06 06:32:18

Great. Given the millions of ex-felons, 90% or more of whom will vote democratic, the DNC will have a vast new class of thugs/societal parasites to pander to. They will also ensure their permanant stranglehold on the levers of power.

Since the GOP has been hijacked by the neo-cons and financial oligarchs, there’s no place left to go for the middle and working classes, who will be stuck with the bills for Democratic checkbook politics.

Comment by Chrisusc
2007-04-06 12:29:57

“there’s no place left to go for the middle and working classes”

Have you heard of the Boston Tea Party…

 
 
Comment by Jackie Childs
2007-04-06 08:54:57

In a Break From the Past, Florida Will Let Felons Vote

Why not? FL apparently has no problems electing felons. Isn’t Alcee Hastings a convicted felon?

The inmates are truly running the asylum.

Comment by DC in LBV
2007-04-06 09:18:18

That was my first thought too. Crooks voting for crooks. Prison, the new campaign trail.

 
 
Comment by REhobbyist
2007-04-06 10:16:28

I guess we’ve reached a critical mass of ex-white-collar-crimes felons who have talked the governor into letting them vote again.

 
 
Comment by Ben
2007-04-06 06:11:25

Why shouldn’t felons be able to vote?

People suing to get out of their deposits in Key West

http://www.keysnews.com/300482335664951.bsp.htm

[i]Investors who had hoped to flip their condominiums before they even closed on their properties are suing the Santa Maria to return their $1 million in deposits. A second suit by another attorney is pending.[/i]

Comment by flatffplan
2007-04-06 06:17:38

or own guns ?
it’s a right they gave up when they commited the crime
soon lots of RE folks will join them

Comment by Neil
2007-04-06 08:45:29

Why shouldn’t felons be able to vote?

ROTFL

It does amaze me how many Americans don’t realize that by definition forfeits their Constitutional rights (excl. what is given back by admendments).

This will be interesting.
Neil

Comment by Ben
2007-04-06 10:51:01

I am a felon, I pay taxes, employ people, why should I not be given the right to vote back once I paid my debt to society?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by the_voz
2007-04-06 11:52:14

voting is not a right, it is a Privilege. One that can and should be taken away from those who are unable to differentiate between right and wrong. How can we as a society allow those who stomp in the face of others rights have a voice in deciding our future….?

 
Comment by Diggs
2007-04-06 12:36:52

I don’t think it matters if it is a right or privelege. The right to own and bear arms is a constitutional right. Felons are not allowed to own, possess, or even be in the same residence of a firearm if they know it is there.

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-04-06 12:52:08

It is a privilege that should be made a “right”.

The largest and fastest growing industry in the US is prisons. Should a wife, who in a fit of rage, kills her husband and serves her 6 months in jail be denied the privilege of voting? In Florida there appears to be discrimination based on color, on who is sentenced; therefore the laws in Florida banning felons from voting would be discriminatory. Or the recreational drug user that goes to jail or the prostitute that goes to jail. Those are moral crimes not crimes against society. What about the tax evaders and white collar criminals?

Felons should have a chance to rebuild a life. It is unfathomable to me to have 2.3% of the population in prison when the last 2 elections have been decided by

 
Comment by the_voz
2007-04-06 14:08:39

I can only say that the proponderance of the evidence, as well as, beyond a reasonable doubt, in the face of a judge or jury, would in many circumstances find in favor of those who are unjustly accused.

I might add that the archaic drug laws in this country actually are in place to do precisely the opposite of the intentions of the men who drafted those same laws.

I shouldnt get into this, or I’ll never get back to work.

 
Comment by Ben
2007-04-06 15:33:30

How can we as a society allow those who stomp in the face of others rights have a voice in deciding our future….?

How is possessing some lsd at a grateful dead show ten years ago stomping on the face of anybody?

I am allowed it vote in almost every other state, why not Florida. Do honestly think I am going to get a bunch of felons together and legalize rape or something?

 
Comment by Gadfly
2007-04-06 16:43:28

It sucks that a felony rap (which is so all-encompassing these days–especially re: The “War on Drugs”) could keep a productive, informed citizen from voting, yet the toothless mouthbreathers (you know, the ones who vote for Sanjaya on American Idol) get to vote for their favorite hairdo–er–politician.
Voting *should* be a privilege. Maybe like proving you’re Smarter Than a Fifth Grader??
“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.” — W. Churchill

 
 
Comment by Ben
2007-04-06 10:53:42

It does amaze me how many Americans don’t realize that by definition forfeits their Constitutional rights

What definition?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Dave
2007-04-06 12:24:51

Once you’ve served your time, you’re supposed to get back your rights (and responsibilities) as a citizen. Not every crime should carry a life sentence.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Hoz
2007-04-06 06:26:51

“This has to do with people speculating in the real estate market. It was a nationwide trend in 2004 and early 2005. Prices had gone up 40 to 50 percent. They got pinched …. The market is bad. Even by their own words, they never intended to close on the units. Obviously, they were speculating and this is what happens when you speculate. Sometimes it pays off and sometimes it doesn’t.”

Screw ‘em

Comment by Housing Wizard
2007-04-06 08:48:58

Right ,scr-w them . The lawyer will try to make a case for the fact that they were promised a quick turn investment (without even closing escrow ),and ended up holding the bag .

IMO the interesting part to this lawsuit is the aspect of the builder using these pre-construction sales to get a construction loan when it’s clear these buyers did not intend to owner-occupy and I’m sure a high % didn’t even qualify for anything other than a “double escrow”. This is a blackmail case pointing out the evils that went on during the boom on both sides part .

Yesterday I read in the paper that a Mortgage Company is calling up people in the foreclosure process trying to offer a re-write of their loans .Apparently the lenders got the message loud and clear that they are in a vunerable position .

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2007-04-06 06:22:19

Tightning, perfect timing with all the re-sets coming.

http://www.reuters.com/article/bankingfinancial-SP/idUSN0520976820070405

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfruede
2007-04-06 06:24:56

Contrary to the relentlessly upbeat pronouncements of the local NAR shills, it seems it’s not so different here in Colorado Springs after all. Here’s the [ugly] YOY stats for March 2007:

26% increase in inventory (to over 5600 active listings)
-1.9% drop in median price
-14% decrease in sales (contract cancelations not included).
45% increase in foreclosures (325 vs. 224 in Mar 07)

Foreclosures have hit 17-year highs. Right now there’s roughly one forclosure for every 2.5 sales. Also note that the impact of credit tightening due to the subprime implosion (not to mention to coming alt-A train wreck) hasn’t really shown up yet, since most sales/closings take 60 days or longer.

Sources:

http://put.elpasoco.com/NR/rdonlyres/3BE6A35A-85BE-441F-9D01-EB8DCED68F2F/0/ptstatistics.htm

http://www.ppar.com/public/stats_public.asp

Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 07:05:09

“Right now there’s roughly one foreclosure for every 2.5 sales.”

But at least you don’t have a recession there in the Springs, right?

My question: Will that 1 foreclosure to 2.5 sales ratio increase to 1:1 at some point?

Comment by jim A
2007-04-06 07:34:56

Wasn’t there something recently about some town in FL where cancellations exceeded sales, leading to NEGATIVE sales?

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfruede
2007-04-06 17:12:26

Stucco,

The 1:1 ratio is a matter of ‘when’, not ‘if’. It’s not far off. When monthly foreclosures equal or exceed monthly sales, I’ll develop a more serious interest in house-hunting.

 
 
 
Comment by jmunnie
2007-04-06 06:34:15

Class war and credit snobs

“Tightening loan standards now, when Wall Street has already lost its appetite for subprime and Alt-A loans, is a classic closing-the-condominium-door-after-the-borrowers-have-all-gone-bankrupt strategy. The real question is whether at the height of the madness, in 2005 and 2006, when my phone was ringing off the hook with obviously dodgy telemarketing calls begging me to refinance my mortgage, some sage words from government officials or policy action could have prevented the market from getting out of whack. We’ll never know the answer to that, because the de facto decision was to let the market take care of itself.”

Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 06:59:31

“…let the market take care of itself.”

With 569K U.S. foreclosures but only 19K sales (http://realestate.yahoo.com/Foreclosures), it will be interesting to see if the decision to not “interfere” with the market will stand pat as lenders (or their bagholders) try to unload all this property.

 
Comment by jim A
2007-04-06 07:39:56

Heck, I STILL get an average of two calls a day asking me to refinance. And some of ‘em aren’t idiots, but most are:
“How much money would you be interested in getting back?”
“I’m not interested in borrowing any more money”
“No, how much money do you want?”
“I do not wish to increase my debt.”
It’s surprising how many times we can stay on the merry go round.

 
 
Comment by accroyer
2007-04-06 06:36:31

A few months back I posted a comment about a friend of mine from the military that had bought a house in March of ‘06. The house was a 3bd 2ba average home (305,000), their payment is 2,400 a month on a ARM. This individual has not made a payment for over 6 months and just bought a new SUV last week. There is no sense of urgency about the home being foreclosed on and to top it off they are out of work at the present time. I am lost for words , i cant believe that the bank has not put the house in foreclosure and kicked them out. According to him the bank does not want the house back and is trying everything they can to work out a payment. I am missing something here? Have times become so desperate that even the banks are laxing their standards in order to keep the forclosure market in perspective? I should have bought a house and not made a payment , then I could make my demands at the bank how I am going to pay back the loan.

Comment by txchick57
2007-04-06 06:39:54

Of course you’d have a trashed credit record for your trouble if that matters to you. Late payments all go on there. If your buy got a SUV, I’d hate to see the interest rate he’s paying.

Comment by synthetik
2007-04-06 08:25:13

it’s probably a subprime auto loan!

 
Comment by Gadfly
2007-04-06 16:31:49

And he probably parks off-site–or in a neighbor’s garage to stimy the repo man. What a gem!

 
 
Comment by Sean_From_NVA
2007-04-06 06:41:42

Just wait everything is working slowly. The stakeholders of the banking Industry will demand action soon. Just sit back and watch the Titanic slowly sink.

Comment by HoustonStan
2007-04-06 06:55:46

I agree Sean. It is a matter of time.

The bank probably doesn’t have resources to force a foreclosure on this scale at this time. REO requires resources to manage it. Lend in haste, repent at leisure.

Comment by kckid
2007-04-06 08:25:38

FASB 159 allows institutions to reduce the value of securities held on the balance sheet and not touch the income statement thus reducing retained earnings. It’s a slight of hand to hide losses when reporting earnings.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by But_Im_Not_Dead_Yet
2007-04-06 10:27:00

Are you kidding me???

 
 
 
 
Comment by John Fontain
2007-04-06 06:50:17

The longer you wait to take your medicine, the sicker you become. The banks are putting off the inevitable and by doing so are likely making the end game even worse.

Comment by palmetto
2007-04-06 07:12:37

Amen, Brothah John. Testify!

 
Comment by jim A
2007-04-06 07:43:16

Once you’ve reached the Serin level of “So insolvent you’ll never pay it back,” there’s no economic reason not to have fun until they catch you. The question is, why would anyone give a car loan to someone who wasn’t current on their mortgage?

 
Comment by nhz
2007-04-06 10:05:16

the other explanation could be that they know some kind of bailout is in the works.

About 5 years ago, over 50% of the homes in an expensive waterfront development near my hometown were (unofficially) on the market because the owners were under water with the mortgage or no longer able to make payments. This kind of problem tends to spread quickly in certain neighborhoods. Most of the mortgages were provided by the same bank. They could have foreclosed on the homes, but that would not have been a clever move for the bank: demand for those expensive homes was weak (certainly at the time) and they would have lost lots of money if they put all those home on the market within a short time.

The bank silently negotiated most of the mortgages (probably they knew that most of the owners would be able to repay the mortgage in future, although maybe over a longer time period). A few years later home price inflation and again lower mortgages rates have bailed out the bank and probably most of the homeowners as well (but many of them probably have a mortgage with less favourable terms now).

 
 
Comment by Army No Va
2007-04-06 06:58:41

I think some of the bankers probably know how bad it could get and are looking for ways to plug the dike, as it were. But water relentlessly flows downhill.

When it becomes obvious these tactics won’t work, then the foreclosures will roll. We really haven’t started yet. We haven’t seen the 2+ pages of microfont RTC homes listed every Sunday, yet. Probably in 2008-10, every Sunday.

 
Comment by Scott
2007-04-06 10:21:17

This IS The Art of the Deal, per Trump. Basically, you can re-negotiate terms since that’s ultimately in the Bank’s interest, versus holding bad paper. I pride myself on being unconventional in many respects - willing to think outside the box - but this is a tad insane for my personal tastes…still, I do think that’s the basic strategy you’re describing.

Is it really that surprising when you consider the gloating about REOs evident here on this blog? Yes, I want to see the dumb/greedy lenders hurt and the dumb, greedy buyers - mainly because I feel I’ve played by the conservative traditional rules. But, I can well understand why it’s in the interest of both parties to cut the gordian knot.

 
Comment by patient renter
2007-04-06 10:28:27

This reminds me of OCRenter’s recent coverage of mortgage fraud going on. Everyone should check out his recent posts if you haven’t.

http://bubbletracking.blogspot.com/

 
Comment by Uncle Git
2007-04-06 11:21:45

He’s filing for BK and walking away from it all.

He obvioulsy thinks he had to get the SUV now as once he files BK he won’t have to pay for it.

After losing the house he’s not going to be geting any credit any time soon.

Comment by In Colorado
2007-04-06 11:51:05

He might be in for a rude surprise. Consumer BK ain’t what it used to be!

 
Comment by Chrisusc
2007-04-06 12:35:12

Explain to me how in current BK laws, you do not have to pay back an auto loan, but you still get to keep the car? This is a new one on me…

 
 
Comment by Mike in Miami
2007-04-06 20:28:34

Just looked at a foreclose property from RealtTrac.com. They still had a Lexus and a BMW Z4 convertible in the driveway. Can’t make their payments on the house but still driving vehicles I am hard pressed to afford making a decent salary. Different folks, different priorities. Do you really need a $800/month car payment if you can’t come up with your mortgage payment? I suppose some folk do….go figure.

 
 
Comment by Billy Boney and Ma
2007-04-06 06:46:01

Jobs much stronger than expected

Growth in U.S. payrolls well above forecasts as unemployment rate drops rather than expected rise.

April 6 2007: 9:31 AM EDT

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Job growth jumped and unemployment dipped unexpectedly in March, the government reported Friday, signs the labor market is holding up better than economists had thought.

Employers added 180,000 jobs to payrolls last month, the Labor Department reported, up from 113,000 in February, which was also revised higher. Economists surveyed by Briefing.com had forecast a gain of 135,000 while Reuters’ survey showed a consensus for 120,000.

The unemployment rate dipped to 4.4 percent - the lowest since October - from 4.5 percent in February. Economists had bet the rate would creep back up to 4.6 percent. October and March are the only two months since May 2001 that unemployment has been this low. The unemployment rate for college graduates is down to 1.8 percent.
http://money.cnn.com/2007/04/06/news/economy/jobs_march/index.htm?postversion=2007040609

Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 07:10:34

Jobs growth is a somewhat meaningless statistic for guaging economic strength, as the composition in employment matters a great deal; a job at BigBoxMart does not equal an automotive engineering position.

jibjab.com (click on the link to BigBoxMart…)

Comment by Palisades Park
2007-04-06 07:14:36

I think calling it a meaningless statistic is over the top. Job growth is good. Now if home prices stay flat and jobs and wages keep growing, we will keep moving in the direction of housing affordability.

Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 07:38:27

“we will keep moving in the direction of housing affordability.”

And we’ll get there by 2024…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2007-04-06 08:02:20

And people say you aren’t an optimist ;-)

 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2007-04-06 08:02:57

I saw that one. If it wasn’t so true, it would be funny.

 
 
Comment by ajas
2007-04-06 08:33:48

This is nothing but good news! There is no chance for the FED to cut now, and probably they are more inclined to raise. Everyone will pat each other on the back now “Housing problems are contained”. No need for a bailout. Just batton down the hatches on lending and history will write itself.

Even if those stats are not meaningful, they are treated with significance, and the effect is exactly what we want. 10 year treasury yields up! Dollar up! Not only is lending tighter but rates are up… Good, Good news.

 
 
Comment by dimedropped
2007-04-06 06:51:26

The latest builder scam in Florida. Here, it goes this way. An associate of mine actually went to a builder to hear this BS. They told him that they would kick back 10% of the purchase price to the broker who would then give the money to my associate, the buyer.

The associate then asked why they were doing this rather than reduce the price of the house. He was told it was because they wanted to keep the sales prices up for valuation purposes. He then revealed he is an appraiser. They stammered and closed the discussion.

He then informed them that what they were proposing was unethical if not illegal and called me to ask what he should do. I told him not to deal with anyone so unscupulous and I would investigate our due dilligence in such cases. (He never intended to buy.) He wanted to know what a “new paradigm” in home ownership was all about.

Now here is the rub. I am not sure this is illegal as I have never heard of such an arrangement, but I know it is wrong and at the least is skewing the market in favor of the builder. The damnedest thing is we can’t trust the data for appraisals any longer. It is clearly a violation of the contract. It is not the value of the subject of the contract.

I don’t know who to call or contact about this but I am definitely going to drop a dime on them. Any suggestions out there?

Comment by HoustonStan
2007-04-06 06:59:49

You would think media would want to bust this as a story but unfortunately, a “reporter” today is not investigative or independent minded.

Maybe the way to do this is tape it and put it on youtube…

 
Comment by dimedropped
2007-04-06 07:14:48

I sent it to an investigative reporter in my area.

 
Comment by audet
2007-04-06 07:17:54

Well, your appraiser buddy just found a good argument to discount appraisals in the neighborhood by 10% going forward. At least.

 
Comment by James Bednar
2007-04-06 07:20:35

This isn’t an infrequent affair.

I know of a deal on a $4m property that involved a $500,000 decorating allowance (among other allowances, landscaping, etc), all paid back to the buyer after closing.

Not a case of mortgage fraud, since this was an all-cash deal. The builder suggested it for two reasons, to raise comps in the development, and to “set a record” for most expensive home sold in a particular area. Buyer was able to claim “bragging rights” as well.

jb

Comment by jim A
2007-04-06 07:45:44

And what’s the tax bill on the extra 500k?

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2007-04-06 07:25:22

Hello, dime. Isn’t there a state organization (like the FAR) that oversees the licensing of appraisers? You could report the builders to them, just to keep your colleagues on the straight and narrow. You could also call the Attorney General’s office, although from what I saw locally about McCollum’s involvement with Jim Walter Homes, I’m not sure how effective that would be.

But there are also gadfly organizations like the ACLU (not my fave people, I’m just using it as an example) who might be interested. Also, lawyers are interested in this sort of stuff for class action purposes. Florida Tax Watch is another organization that might be able to help, since taxes are based on appraisals. Also call Florida Speaker of the House Marco Rubio’s office and ask where to report this. He’s right in the thick of Florida’s real estate “problem”. Even if he’s not interested, his office should be able to direct you to someone who is.

You are right, this is screwing with your job, if you can’t trust the data for appraisals. It is detrimental to the public also. AH, wait, here’s another idea. There’s a Florida banking oversight organization of some sort. Check out the MyFlorida website. Given the current foreclosure climate, you bet your patootie that banks will be VERY interested in this data, as they will be looking for all sorts of whipping boys. Banks rely on your data for lending decisions and banks that lend for real estate are not very happy right now. They need a target and you can give it to them.

Comment by auger-inn
2007-04-06 08:35:00

Speaking of oversight, anyone hear from Paladin lately? I miss his posts.

 
 
Comment by John
2007-04-06 09:45:13

As a CPA, I think the IRS may be interested in these types of deals. I’m assuming the builder is recording the sale of the house as income including the additional 10% and then recording the 10% as an expense in its cost of sales. The question then becomes, who is recording the 10% as income? I doubt the agent is recording the 10% as income and paying the taxes on it. If he is recording it as income I would bet he is also recording an equal expense when he passes it on to the buyer. The buyer then would be responsible for the taxes on the income. Since they decided to format the deal this way I don’t think the IRS would accept that 10% as just a reduction of the buyer’s basis.

Can you post the builder’s name? I would be interested in researching this further.

 
Comment by Chrisusc
2007-04-06 12:38:25

This is loan fraud if there is a loan involved and it has not been:

A) adjusted in the appraisal, if the appraisal is used to loan money
b) disclosed to the lender
c) disclosed to the secondary market buyers

 
 
Comment by WAman
2007-04-06 06:53:46

Prices up in King and Snohomish counties of Washington State. What sense can we make of that? Is this another case of escrows that never close as buyers find out the real costs of the loan and are now not qualified?

Comment by S-Crow
2007-04-06 07:16:00

WAman-
I’m in the business.

Median prices in a changing market can overshoot a bit due to the distribution of sales used in the statistics (ie, higher end home sales over weighting the prices in the lower end, which are slowing further—much more concerning in my view. This is not uncommon when overall sales units are lower than months earlier.

Just ask one question: Does it make sense, fundamentally, that sales prices continue to move upward, overall sales are down, and there is a continual stream of about 300-400 unit list price reductions PER DAY? Inventory increases continues to outpace that of sold prices.

Agents representing borrowers are negotiating home sale prices. Lots of countering. Unheard of just last year.

PS. Pierce county did show a drop in median prices.

Do not be fooled. The flag is blowing in the other direction.

 
 
Comment by Mr Vincent
Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 07:30:57

What could possibly go wrong with this diversification strategy? Take a highpaying job in the subprime lending sector, then immediately take out a really big loan to buy a really big house…

‘The turmoil in the sub-prime mortgage sector hits some workers as hard as borrowers.

Brad Cottrell was a paramedic when a friend introduced him to the high-rolling world of sub-prime mortgage lending.

Within three years of landing a job with Ownit Mortgage Solutions Inc. in Agoura Hills, his salary had tripled. His wife quit working and they bought a 3,000-square-foot house in Camarillo.

But late last year, defaults on risky loans began to rise. By December, Ownit was out of business, and the 35-year-old father of three was out of a job.

“It was a nightmare,” he said. “I felt like I got hit by a Mack truck.”‘

Comment by REhobbyist
2007-04-06 10:25:16

Go back to being a paramedic, Brad. At least it’s an honest profession.

 
 
Comment by OCBear
2007-04-06 07:46:42

The 29-year-old mother of four lost a job that paid $21 an hour, plus commissions. Williams landed a new job March 2, making $12 an hour handling collections for a bank.

“I’m surprised I haven’t called myself yet,” she said

Or even better calling the spouse at home, “listen here deadbeat, and I know your a deadbeat you were still in bed when I left for work…” LOL

Comment by Chrisusc
2007-04-06 12:39:32

That’s funny.

 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2007-04-06 07:13:27

Now, here’s a guy who can win. Reagan Lite.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0407/3429.html

Comment by audet
2007-04-06 07:20:49

Spare me. Another old fart, dim bulb, imperial, hyper-capitalist apologist. Just what the country needs. NOT.

Comment by txchick57
2007-04-06 08:28:12

I have no opinion on what kind of president he would be. I don’t really care. I just think he can win. First Republican yet that can.

Comment by REhobbyist
2007-04-06 10:29:58

I agree with txchick. All of the Republican candidates carry too much baggage. Either they have too many ex-wives, which the religious right won’t like, or they have liberal histories, like Romney and McCain. Or both, like Giuliani. Thompson has experience, is a true conservative with a consistent record, and is a known quantity. I think that if he wins the nomination, he’ll be elected. And no other Republican candidates have raised much money, to boot.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Gadfly
2007-04-06 17:03:51

Speaking of Repub candidates, I love reading about Sen. John “Ace” McCain. What a peach!!
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_11_16/ai_61361646

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 19:05:41

At least McCain has prior experience with lending market meltdowns (as does The OC ;-) ).
———————————————————————
In 1989, the Lincoln Savings and Loan Association of Irvine, Calif., collapsed. Lincoln’s chairman, Charles H. Keating Jr., was faulted for the thrift’s failure. Keating, however, told the House Banking Committee that the FHLBB and its former chief Edwin J. Gray were pursuing a vendetta against him. Gray testified that several U.S. senators had approached him and requested that he ease off on the Lincoln investigation. It came out that these senators had been beneficiaries of $1.3 million (collective total) in campaign contributions from Keating.

This allegation set off a series of investigations by the California government, the United States Department of Justice, and the Senate Ethics Committee. The ethics committee’s investigation focused on five senators: Alan MacG. Cranston (D-Calif.); Dennis W. DeConcini (D-Ariz.); John H. Glenn Jr. (D-Ohio); John S. McCain III (R-Ariz.); and Donald W. Riegle Jr. (D-Mich), who became known as the Keating Five.

 
 
 
 
Comment by BubbleViewer
2007-04-06 07:37:36

txchick,
How about Ron Paul? He is the only candidate who seems to know what is really going on. Did you see him on Bill Maher recently? It was amazing. A politician who made sense and spoke truth. Maher didn’t know what to make of him.

Comment by txchick57
2007-04-06 07:45:53

Ha, I lived in Houston back in the early-mid 80s. I remember Ron Paul. He’s the Ross Perot of this cycle, except not as rich or well known.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2007-04-06 07:40:32

I’d far prefer Ron Paul.

Comment by Chrisusc
2007-04-06 12:43:37

Remember, its still a popularity contest and Ron Paul is not very attractive. The sheeple vote based on taglines, looks and fame - just like in highschool.

Comment by REhobbyist
2007-04-06 21:01:36

Maybe it’s just me, but I think they’re all pretty ugly. The Democrats are younger and have more hair, but I still think that Mr. Thompson will rule the day.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Troy
2007-04-06 21:00:44

“Even the poor have cell phones, televisions, and computers. Public school is free, and anyone can get free medical care at any emergency room in the country”. — Ron Paul, June 2006

just another charming denizen of Liberdopia.

 
Comment by technovelist
2007-04-06 21:34:12

I’d vote for him for President… again.

 
 
 
Comment by Left LA Behind
2007-04-06 07:28:22

Is it the market or the dissolution of the marriage?

Britney Slashes Price on Malibu Mansion

Posted Apr 5th 2007 3:08PM by TMZ Staff
Filed under: Britney Spears, Celebrity Pay Dirt
Sources tell TMZ that Britney Spears and Kevin Federline are so desperate to finish their financial ties, that they’ve slashed more than one million dollars off the asking price of their Malibu mansion.

http://ww.tmz.com/2007/04/05/britney-slashes-price-on-malibu-mansion/

Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 07:33:38

There is plenty of celebrity real estate news these days…

“Ellen DeGeneres has become a major real estate tycoon, reports Big Time Listings. She’s flipping her Montecito, California estate, which she bought less than six months ago. DeGeneres bought the estate, which has reportedly been renovated and newly landscaped, for $15.75 million. It’s now on the market for $24 million:”

http://www.towleroad.com/2007/04/ellen_degeneres.html

Comment by txchick57
2007-04-06 08:08:29

Well, I saw some good looking guys in underwear there! Thanks.

As far as Ellen goes, good luck with that. Maybe you remember Barbra Streisand and her “day trading” back in 1999/early 2000?

Comment by Chrisusc
2007-04-06 12:47:51

I think that in this stage of the game, there will be very few local lenders willing to lend on a property in that price range that has also appreciated at that rate (her wishing price). So I seriously doubt she will make a profit. Further, I would be surprised if she can even unload it right now.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 19:08:42

Sorry to say, TxChick, but I did not get the impression they were for your eyes…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by ChrisO
2007-04-06 13:37:20

Up at that price range, I would think you’re looking at cash transactions, mostly. Isn’t it true that mega-mansions tend to be immune to real estate cycles?

Comment by GetStucco
2007-04-06 19:11:01

Which begs the question of how many really, really rich people are dumb enough to overpay by $8m in cash?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by John Fontain
2007-04-06 07:36:33

From the listing:

“Estimated Monthly Payments: $60,093
*based on 30year fixed APR loan with 20% down and no points”

 
 
Comment by Dan
2007-04-06 07:30:56

Nothing newsworthy, but one listing I bookmarked and check from time to time to see how low it will go:
http://www.melbourne-palm-bay-living.com/home-for-sale-in-florida.html

A F*ucked Flipper in a sea of F*cked Flippers

Comment by Left LA Behind
2007-04-06 09:08:44

All I see is garage…. F-Ugly

Comment by Arizona Slim
2007-04-06 10:36:22

But the garage is the main feature of the house! Just imagine what you can stuff inside of it!

 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2007-04-06 07:51:43

This should make those 100 mile commuters and Hummer drivers happy:

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=3007435&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312

Comment by Arizona Slim
2007-04-06 08:43:44

Yesterday, I had a lunch meeting across town. To liven up my ride to the meeting, I decided to count the “for sale” signs. Here’s a summary:

Distance traveled: 5.5 miles

Number of signs seen: 31, including one that said “sale pending.” (We’ll see about that. Sales have been falling through right and left around here.

Condo conversion attempts seen: 2, including one that’s on its third real estate agency.

And that’s the Arizona Slim report from Tucson.

 
 
Comment by WAman
2007-04-06 08:06:57

The post at the start of this blog from Florida talks about several thousand construction jobs lost. I would really like to know where the new 56k construction jobs are?

 
Comment by Dan S
 
 
 
Comment by Wes Chester
2007-04-06 08:56:20

Hamptons sales comps for first two months 2007 as compared to 2006/2005 - unit sales down 38%, median price up 17%, sales dollars down 5%.

http://tinyurl.com/2aoamg

 
Comment by redhead68
2007-04-06 08:59:28

From the Rocky Mountain News…

“That is one of the driving forces for a promotion unveiled Thursday by Denver-based Home Investment Portfolio Partners Cos.

The company’s offer: Anyone who pays full price for any of 11 homes by April 30 receives a two-night, three-day vacation package.

Travel packages are available to Mexico, Las Vegas, New York City, San Francisco, San Diego and Phoenix.

The packages are worth about $2,500 or more, depending on the cost of the homes. The homes are priced from $168,000 to $1.125 million and have a total value of $5.493 million.”

I have no words.

 
Comment by auger-inn
2007-04-06 09:11:10

Here is a little bit of bear food for the crowd.

I have some good friends who own a mortgage brokerage down in SW Florida. I sat down with them in FEB 05′ and gave them my RE outlook brief with a warning to divest themselves and diversify into non RE related investments, especially given their jobs. I normally don’t stick my nose into other’s affairs but my wife prodded me into it because she was so concerned for them.
The result of that brief was that within 10 months they purchased an additional 2M. more in waterfront RE. So much for my communication skills.
About 8 months ago they informed us that they were getting a couple of their properties ready for sale. Well, they instead decided to go on a vacation to the “State of Denial” and blew off listing those properties.
An update from them on how business was faring informed us that the majority of loans they were processing were now Refi’s (this was 6 months ago or so). They also noted that several of their competitors have closed shop.
Yesterday comes the panic call. The majority of loans will not close now because of lending standards tightening or companies shutting down lending altogether. They are talking about selling their new cars as well as finally listing all their RE. They’ve laid off half of the staff and they don’t have enough work for the remaining employees (which I gather are mostly commission anyway).
They are pissing away GOBS (tens of thousands) of money each month feeding their alligators and are going to lose AT LEAST 50% of the purchase price on their RE.
My comment to my wife was essentially “too little, too late”. I’m disappointed that I was unable to distill my knowledge down to an articulate argument that they would have taken seriously. These guys were continually bombarded with the “RE always goes up” from the national shills that held seminars or were hired to brief “investors” for individual condo towers. Just a shame that they couldn’t pull back far enough to see the big picture.

Comment by Brad
2007-04-06 09:59:28

good story. greed drowns out all other sounds. so does panic.

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-04-06 10:02:04

auger, read Hoz’s post above about “cognitive economics”. This is the phenomenon many of us run into trying to discuss real estate with our friends and neighbors. You are going up against the brick wall of preconceived notions. Has nothing to do with your communication skills. I was very happy to get Hoz’s input on this, it makes so much sense.

 
Comment by REhobbyist
2007-04-06 10:36:22

We will all have friends and relatives in foreclosure, if not outright bankruptcy, when this is over. It’s fun to laugh at it when we don’t know the principals, but it’s awkward when it happens to good friends. Did they call your wife? How did she react? I hope they aren’t asking for your help.

Comment by auger-inn
2007-04-06 11:19:48

Yeah, they called my wife and no, they aren’t asking for help at all. I’ll have an update with more specifics in a couple of weeks as we are getting together then.
I’m more amazed at their ability to deny reality for so long then I am bummed out about my inability to steer them away from the rocks.

Comment by cassiopeia
2007-04-06 13:40:46

auger-inn, these people are in the LENDING BUSINESS. How is it possible that they did not see it coming? The smart money from this outfits has been running for the exits for months now and they decide to take a vacation? I’m sorry, it doesn’t make sense. You don’t have to be a bubblehead to see that some preemptive measures are in order. I have friends who are builders. They sold their last house a couple of months ago and now they are looking to buy, but very cautiously. And these are people who believe that real estate always goes up. Your friends have a major issue with reality.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by peterpaul
2007-04-06 10:57:19

In your best Nelson voice say, “ha ha”!

Really, you cannot give people advice unless they ask for it. It just won’t take. Better to hunker down and give them a shoulder to cry on, a good scotch, and be patient with their sob story for an evening. And then tell them they are only allowed to stay on the couch for three days…

Comment by Chrisusc
2007-04-06 12:51:28

Three days is about 70 hours too long of a visit…

 
Comment by REhobbyist
2007-04-06 16:30:10

Funny, peterpaul!

 
 
Comment by Brad
2007-04-06 12:31:40

auger,
Maybe this kind of thing (your earlier post) damaged your credibility with them:
———————-
“Here is a good overview of a book written by a CIA insider about the impending downfall of the U.S. and how it was created.
http://www.bullnotbull.com/archive/chalmers-1.html

Comment by auger-inn
2007-04-06 13:06:15

Yeah, that was probably it. Thanks for the tip.

 
 
Comment by Chrisusc
2007-04-06 12:53:07

Looks like thay are about to get an *ss pounding…and without the vaseline.

 
Comment by Jon
2007-04-06 14:27:40

Augur-inn, I know the feeling. 4 years ago, my father decided to invest heavily in real-estate because he “didn’t trust the stock market anymore” and “RE always goes up”. I tried my best to explain that RE has cycles, and being heavily leveraged in it would put them in dire straits eventually. Fast-forward to today. They’re in pre-foreclosure on many properties (they bought around 12-15 lower-end properties with the thought of guaranteed section 8 rents), and are also in way over their heads on unsecured debt. It’s an ugly situation–I don’t see any way out for them other than BK.

But I don’t blame myself or my communications skills–I presented good, sounds arguments that they listened to and chose to ignore.

Comment by REhobbyist
2007-04-06 16:33:17

What a shame. My in-laws did a similar thing in the late eighties on a much smaller scale. They are now renting a senior apartment (those things are really expensive!), and rely on their children to supplement their fixed incomes. Thank God for Medicare, or we’d be spending a lot more!

 
 
 
Comment by AnonyRuss
2007-04-06 09:55:02

I love the photographs of this Arizona house.

http://phoenix.craigslist.org/rfs/305850767.html

“Please someone buy my home. I don’t want to go through the standard proceedures. Out of pocket money, closing cost and all the other 3% to the realtor, ect…. Just buy my home, and get me out of the financial obligations. I do not want any money, I do not have any money to close. The home is only 9 years old, in a beautiful neighborhood, with great neighbors, schools and churches. Abundant stores and restaurants all around.
The home is not in arears, no payments have been missed yet. The house payment is 1512.00 a month and that is with my homeowners insurance and property taxes included. Price may likely change when adjusted to your claim on insurance. Please Please buy my home. I will take pictures today. I am also willing to lease with option to buy. Must have at least 3600.00 as down payment if I went that route. And a very good background, job, and references.
serious inquiries only please. Much better pictures will be available.”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2007-04-06 10:39:41

Slim’s photo comment: Is this clown selling the house or the car that’s parked in front of it?

Comment by REhobbyist
2007-04-06 16:34:54

LOL, Slim. I think the car has more going for it than the house.

 
 
Comment by azrenter
2007-04-06 12:47:40

same thing rents for $775.00 brand new.

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2007-04-06 10:38:48

This just in: Implode-o-meter hits 50!

http://www.lenderimplode.com/

 
Comment by patient renter
2007-04-06 10:41:48

What happaned to paladin and his site?

 
Comment by AnonyRuss
2007-04-06 11:00:47

It really is a “least option.”

Star Valley/Losing Shirt in Tucson/SDCIA Thread

“I’m losing my tenant this month mainly due to a burglary they suffered a couple months ago and then, according to the tenant, a gang related drug bust recently.
They say they hear gun shots occasionally too!
They also said that they know “several families that are moving also”.
It’s the Wild F’n SouthWest!
I’m putting mine on the market as a least/option at least during this month and possibly through May…although I’m not optimistic about the prospects, especially if the area is really as messy as has been reported to me.
It’s sadly funny how these things roll out. This was supposed to be an in/out deal to generate some capital to do other deals. Now it’s my worst performing asset disallowing me from comfortably doing more deals!
Suffice to say, I’ve lost my shirt…now I’m working to keep my pants on!”

http://www.websitetoolbox.com/tool/post/sdcia/vpost?id=1205179&trail=180

Comment by zeropointzero
2007-04-06 11:59:13

“……especially if the area is really as messy as has been reported to me.”

There’s some excellent pre-purchase due diligence done there, eh?

 
 
Comment by AKRon
2007-04-06 22:15:24

The Chicago Mercantile Exchange Housing Futures are bizarre. They appear to be a pure hedge device (perilously close to gambling in the legal sense)… they are based on the Case-Shiller price index. I thought they would be ‘real’ futures/options (i.e. have some mortgages or property delivery as a basis for the futures, as in most commodity contracts).

http://www.cme.com/trading/prd/overview_HNG18558.html

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post