June 1, 2007

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For June 1, 2007

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

233 Comments »

Comment by einzige
2007-06-01 04:57:44

The latest graph of Maricopa County Notices of Trustee’s Sales can be found here. May’s count was an 11-year (and probably much more) record.

Comment by packman
2007-06-01 05:38:24

Question - how do you find and build those stats? Are they online on a county website?

Plus (no offense) - where is Maricopa County?

Comment by colomountains
2007-06-01 06:14:52

That is Phoenix, AZ and its soroundings.

 
 
Comment by 85249 is Toast
2007-06-01 06:22:15

That graph is impressive.

Comment by az_lender
2007-06-01 07:57:34

Actually, what surprises me (as a Phoenix-area lender) is that the latest peak is only about 15% higher than the 2003 peak. I hope that the two repo situations I faced in 2003 are the last two I will ever face, but at that time, I wasn’t even aware that foreclosures were high in the surrounding environment, I thought I just made a couple of mistakes about choosing clientele. And, there was no sense (at least not on my part) that a bubble had overblown itself and was breaking (in 03). I did indeed have to unload those two properties at a slight loss but I attributed that loss mainly to my own impatience. Just not willing to carry them on my books, pay the HOA fees, etc. Anyway, if I did not know about the national bubble now bursting, the Maricopa graph would tell me only that things now are “a little” worse than 2003. Of course I agree with all of you that now is The Big One and Maricopa will be awful.

Comment by 85249 is Toast
2007-06-01 08:17:06

The trend is what’s most impressive. The path to peak in 2003 was up and down. This time it’s to the moon with no signs of slowing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by az_lender
2007-06-01 08:29:09

That’s a good point Mister Chandler.

 
 
Comment by Groundhogday
2007-06-01 10:04:44

Interesting double dip. I remember thinking that the bubble was about to burst in Bozeman, MT in 2003 but then with the Greenspan “free money” machine it picked up again and shot to the moon. 2003 was probably the natural point for the housing cycle to turn, and we would have seen a downturn like the early 1990’s or early 1980’s. Instead the Greenspan put took us from bubble to hyperbubble and now we will really pay the price.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Cobradriver
2007-06-01 06:37:18

All i’m gonna say is…

WOW,WOW,WOW,WOW…man the pain is a coming…

Chris

Comment by lost in utah
2007-06-01 09:55:03

LOL at your unbounded eloquence!

 
 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-06-01 07:14:48

Thanks for the graph. Now excuse my ignorance, but what does it mean?

Comment by 85249 is Toast
2007-06-01 08:15:18

A Notice of Trustee’s Sale is the beginning of the foreclosure process (90 days to public auction).

 
 
Comment by wawawa
2007-06-01 07:22:12

Where is Maricopa County? What state?

Comment by wawawa
2007-06-01 07:31:58

Ok, Ok, I am blind.

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 08:33:15

That is a silent explosion if ever there was one (thx to underreporting in the MSM)…

 
 
Comment by Brandon
2007-06-01 05:39:24

According to our fine newspaper, Idaho is immune from foreclosure problems. Reality is a little different:

$272550 Foreclosure Sale By Bank - New Construction
http://boise.craigslist.org/rfs/342242786.html

$232500 Foreclosed New Construction For Sale by Bank
http://boise.craigslist.org/rfs/342226846.html

$193000 SAVE THIS PROPERTY FROM FORECLOSURE!
http://boise.craigslist.org/rfs/342144447.html

Eventually, the cheerleaders will see that $10-$12 an hour assembly jobs in Boise’s “high tech” economy can’t support prices.

Comment by flatffplan
2007-06-01 05:54:05

aren’t high ceilings kind of a drag in that climate ?

Comment by in Colorado
2007-06-01 07:01:49

Not if the houses are properly insulated.

Comment by desmo
2007-06-01 07:13:02

Not if the houses are properly insulated

So the insulation stops the warm air from rising inside the house?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2007-06-01 07:47:18

Well, if you design a house so that there are air intakes located high up there, then the warm air can be recirculated through the house. If you have a tall atrium with no circulation, then yes, you’ll have a temperature difference. Kind of like three-level townhouses with central stairs here, where if you turn off the central air fan, the basement gets cold and the bedrooms up top get roasty.

 
Comment by lost in utah
2007-06-01 09:59:22

Had a log house with cathedral ceilings, couldn’t get up there to paint or dust or anything. It was nearly new, but needed rechinking, so had a few spiders around. I recall fondly laying in bed at night and throwing bundled socks at the ceiling to try and get the spiders… it was awful to heat (colorado).

 
Comment by In Colorado
2007-06-01 10:03:32

Un like in Cali-land, houses in the rocky mountain region have vents on the floor and returns high up. That must be one one the reasons it costs less to heat and cool our 3000 sq foot house (4000 if you include the basement) than it did to do the same with our old 1500 sq ft house in San Diego.

 
 
 
 
Comment by rvdoc
2007-06-01 06:09:34

Being a Treasure Valley resident also I find it laughable that the RE/media industries have gone to great lengths to bury the problems. Just because inventories nearly doubled in one month doesn’t mean we have a problem. Just because every new sub I’m watching is showing no sales for the last few months is no problem. Just because a nice strip mall up and open since January only has one tenant doesn’t mean there’s way too much retail space going up. Just because every small local bank around here is up to its eyeballs in financing all of this crap doesn’t mean we have a problem.

The fecal matter should really hit the fan by this Winter.

Comment by not a gator
2007-06-01 09:18:48

It’s funny–I just talked to a major Gainesville realtor (does commercial and residential properties, also builds with some friends of his), and he’s convinced that the media is keeping the buyers away. At one point we were talking and another woman came in the room and said “Isn’t it that the prices are too high?”

He was quiet for a moment and reiterated that it was the media.

He also thinks 5-10% off 2006 prices is a sweet deal. I told him that the only properties in my budget right now in Gainesville are shacks built without the benefit of a plumb line in the early 20th century. I also told him about the coworker who got a 3bed2bath for $60K at a bank auction only three years ago.

Nope, it’s the “durn media”.

Although he agrees that the condo craze in G’ville is ridiculous and the market is not moving … and bought my argument that even though UF has not reached peak enrollment, the overeager builders are oversupplying housing to students and there is no power for landlords to raise rents.

Of course, he doesn’t really have much of a stake in that market, since he sells the properties, he doesn’t rent ‘em.

Hope springs eternal… I told him that there is a chance despite the spring shocks that the financing situation could improve because of the continuing excess liquidity in global capital markets. The house of cards will topple, but not necessarily today (hell, the stock funds I still hold have done great since the beginning of the year… damn…).

He didn’t really care about what I had to say on that topic, though, for one really good reason: the credit crunch has no effect on many of his buyers because he can still get 100% financing through government programs. He can even use the money to cover closing costs (sketchy…). He called it a “no brainer”. I told him that, as a buyer, I was unwilling to take on that kind of risk (say, if I had to move and the market went down).

He said the market doesn’t go down–it’s the damn media.

Lol.

 
 
Comment by cami
2007-06-01 06:15:26

I wonder if that last house has already received a NOD. They actually have tenants leased through Feb 2008. I wonder if the tenants have any idea that they are going to get kicked out onto the curb. If anyone’s interested in trying to get more info: the address is 4659 N Zachary Way Meridian, ID 83642 (MLS#: 98306992). It’s not on zillow yet (built in 2006, looks like a new subdivision). Also, what I can’t understand is, at a rent of $975/mo, a good chunk of the mortgage nut is actually being covered (depending on loan terms), so where the heck is the money going? I guess you could believe that they are being proactive by listing it so early before the tenant’s lease expires, but I’m just not that optimistic.

Comment by aNYCdj
2007-06-01 06:39:42

Probably has a redneck tenant who believes his lease expires if the house is sold.

Any Lawyers in Boise, want to make sure he gets paid to break his lease?

Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 23:11:13

HE=Tennant
HIS= LANDLORD?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by gwynster
2007-06-01 08:40:54

Anyone else catch the irony of the streets being named after So Ca beaches?

Comment by cassiopeia
2007-06-01 10:21:30

gwynster, you beat me to it.

 
Comment by Mike G
2007-06-01 12:22:09

I used to live in a subdivision in Texas with streets named after spectacular natural features of the western U.S. — Glen Canyon, Mount Shasta, etc. It just reminded me how featureless and ugly the Texas landscape was by comparison.

I moved back to California within 18 months.

Comment by In Colorado
2007-06-01 12:30:40

California does have some beautiful natural landscapes. Pity that so few Californians live near them.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2007-06-01 05:51:52

Education (GOV ) and health services(1/2 GOV) added 54,000 jobs last month. Professional and busineses services expanded employment by 32,000. Leisure and hospitality boosted payrolls by 46,000 and the government added(MORE GOV ) 22,000 positions. Those gains help to blunt weankess elsewhere. Manufacturers shed 19,000 jobs and retailers cut 5,000. Construction employment showed no change ( when illegals go it no show)

Comment by Brandon
2007-06-01 05:56:39

“Leisure and hospitality boosted payrolls by 46,000″

These jobs are low wage- not sure how that will blumt a loss in factory jobs- most airlines and hotels start wages around $9-$10 an hour.

Comment by hd74man
2007-06-01 08:27:13

most airlines and hotels start wages around $9-$10 an hour.

In the New England tourist industry it’s minimum wage with no health insurance benefits.

And then there are the establishment’s who hire “summer nationals” aka mostly college kids from Eastern Europe so they don’t have to pay SS and unemployment insurance.

They lie to state government for an exemption by saying no locals will take the jobs they offer which is a crock of BS.

Meanwhile native HS/college kids can’t find squat for summer employment.

Another area where the fix is in.

 
 
Comment by ajas
2007-06-01 05:58:29

Jobs Jobs Everywhere!

bloomberg buries the real story in there at the end:

A report this month from the Labor Department, based on tax records from all businesses, showed the economy added 19,000 private-sector jobs in the third quarter. That contrasts with the government’s monthly payroll figures, based on a smaller survey, which showed a gain of 498,000 jobs for the period.

Construction

The report showed declines in residential-construction jobs, and more losses may follow in coming months, economists said.

The Commerce Department said yesterday that the economy expanded at an annual rate of 0.6 percent from January through March, down from a 1.3 percent initial estimate the government reported on April 27.

Comment by 85249 is Toast
2007-06-01 06:27:52

That contrasts with the government’s monthly payroll figures, based on a smaller survey, which showed a gain of 498,000 jobs for the period.

So the parasites are adding jobs at an annualized rate of 2 million? Nice.

Comment by AmazedRenter
2007-06-01 07:01:59

Read carefully. I believe the author means “The payroll numbers released by the government…”, not government jobs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by az_lender
2007-06-01 08:02:35

Right, but if it’s true that only 19000 of those jobs were in the private sector, then the other 470000 were in the public sector! barf

 
Comment by 85249 is Toast
2007-06-01 08:19:24

I think he’s insinuating the gov’t numbers (half a million new jobs in this economy?!?) are total BS. I’d have to agree.

 
Comment by Jay_Huhman
2007-06-01 08:24:40

No, I believe it refers to two different data series.

Today’sWSJ has a an article on page C1 on the construction of the employment numbers and the current employment numbers in construction.

 
Comment by ajas
2007-06-01 09:32:31

My impression is like 85249, that the govt monthly numbers are total BS (which is a pretty staggering assertion). This follows up on NYT article I posted a couple days ago (again the good stuff is at the end):

“Eventually, the monthly numbers will be revised to reflect the results of the quarterly survey, but that will not be done until data is available for the fourth quarter of last year and the first quarter of this one, and Mr. Mueller said it was too early to conclude that major adjustments would have to be made.

Robert Barbera, the chief economist of ITG, an investment advisory firm, said that he thought the third quarter had been an inflection point in the economy and that the end result would be a substantial reduction in earlier employment estimates.

One reason the monthly survey can be inaccurate is that it has to estimate the number of jobs created by new businesses, which are by definition not included in the survey. It may be that those estimates were too high.

It will not be until next February that the monthly numbers are revised in the next benchmark revision. We may learn then that the job market was not as strong as it seemed to be in late 2006 and early 2007.”

 
 
 
 
Comment by in Colorado
2007-06-01 07:06:14

I recall reading (I think it was on vdare.com some months ago) that outside of healthcare there has been a net loss of private sector jobs during this decade.

 
 
Comment by dublin212
2007-06-01 05:51:53

Hedgies are betting the same way the HBB does…

The dispute centres on derivatives contracts that pay money to investors when bonds backed by subprime mortgage loans – extended to people with past credit problems – run into trouble. The $1,200bn (€890bn) US subprime mortgage bond market has been hit recently by rapidly growing defaults, and hedge funds have profited from the crisis by buying such derivatives.

Some hedge funds say they are concerned that banks that both sell the derivatives contracts and handle mortgage payments could be involved in a form of market manipulation. The funds fear that banks are making concessions on the underlying mortgages to avoid making good on derivatives contracts that pay off in cases of default.

followthe link for the full story
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/3ae806a2-0fa6-11dc-a66f-000b5df10621.html

Comment by txchick57
2007-06-01 05:55:55

Noice. The moneyed powerful vs. the helpless. Should play well in Peoria.

 
Comment by joe
2007-06-01 06:15:23

Got to love it. Basically the banks are doing too things that screw the investors in the TMBS/CDOS (Toxic Mortgage Backed Securities) while looking like they are championing for the little guy.
1st-The modify the loans so that the homedebtor (HD) can stay in the place for another year. The modification obviously reduces the value of the mortgage, thus lessening the value of the TMBS that its bundled up in, yet the investor has already paid for the TMBS based upon the original loan terms.

2nd - The Bank knows the now modified mortgage will only keep the HD in the place for another year. Guess what happens in another year? The buyback provisions for loans that go sour in the TMBS expire!! Hence the investor will be stuck with the sour loan & not the bank!! Good Show.

The investor’s response should be an exercise of the buyback provision upon modification because it alters the original agreement that the TMBS was based upon. Thus putting the risk squarely where it belongs, with the bank that originated the toxic loan via yield spread premium payoffs to the corrupt mortgage broker that fudged the paperwork to get the loan in the first place!!

This will be an interesting fight because both investors and banks have big money and they will duke it out in court where in America he with the most money wins!! In the end the little guy will be homeless, penniless and with ruined credit, but that will be lost in the battle of the moneyed titans!!

Comment by cami
2007-06-01 06:25:22

There was an article a couple of weeks ago about an investor (group) trying to sue a lender (one of the bigger ones I believe), because they alleged that the lender was making up the shortfall on loans during the buyback period so that they wouldn’t have to eat their crappy loans. Once the buyback period was over, then they just let the loans go into default. I have the feeling that we are going to be seeing a lot more of this before it’s all over.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2007-06-01 06:56:45

That’s like the builder ad we saw during our January visit to Florida that offered to make the mortgage payment for the first six months! I’m sure it’s just coincidence that six months happens to be the length of the buyback period for most of the MBO/CDO sales.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Cobradriver
2007-06-01 06:49:27

joe,

My cousin is a investment banker for a major US insurance company. He was down here in Florida a couple of weeks ago and we actually talked about this issue. His response about restructuring the loans in a CDO that a fund owns was “Good effing luck !!!” Like you said when this finally plays out it will be verrrryyyy interesting…

Chris

 
Comment by goirishgohoosiers
2007-06-01 06:53:18

My money is on the banks when that scenario comes to pass. They have the deeper pockets and they will get the pols to line up behind them as those facing reelection in ‘08 try to juice up their populist cred.

Comment by cami
2007-06-01 07:44:20

I think it would depend on the size of the bank. Some of the big players might win out, but for smaller banks (state banks, regional banks) I think the hedgies might have their way.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Michael
2007-06-01 12:43:23

Well, derivatives are nothing by bets. If someone makes money betting that “subprime mortgage loans run into trouble” it means there are idiots who bet on them doing OK. I don’t think it’s a serious issue. There are always GFs.

 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2007-06-01 06:04:21

still some HELOC to be had
at a price !
The Commerce Department reported Friday that personal incomes fell by 0.1 percent in April, following a robust increase of 0.8 percent in March.

 
Comment by davidcee
2007-06-01 06:07:42

More misery in Florida:

I purchased in Cape Coral about one year ago. The home just started to be built in February. The home is worth about $100,000 LESS than the appraisal, and about $60,000 less than I paid for it. This is a catastrophe and a misrepresentation on Reddick and his partners part, having said it was a slam dunk that the property would be worth close to $360,000 when it was finally constructed. Now the interest rate adjustment period for the contruction to perm has arrived, and the home is months away from being completed. If that’s not bad enough, the tax bill just arrived, $1,500 for a piece of crappy, worthless, dirt. I’m so pissed off by this scam. Has anyone else experienced anything similar. I know he was selling these homes in both Cape Coral and Port Charlotte. Somehow I’m going to have to come up with about $60,000 cash when this house is completed. I’m terribly distressed by this.

Comment by Lou Minatti
2007-06-01 06:20:50

I think this is the wrong place for a sympathetic ear.

Comment by palmetto
2007-06-01 06:27:52

I think he’s quoting someone else’s tale.

Comment by Chip
2007-06-01 22:19:36

Agreed. Davidcee has been around here for a long time and is unlikely to have blundered into this, IMO.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Gatorfan
2007-06-01 07:01:20

I googled the “Reddick” referred to in this post and it’s pretty freakin’ hysterical. The “Marshall Reddick Real Estate Network” is a scam outfit that runs seminars and teaches people how to invest in RE “based on spiritual values.” It’s really scary what some people got involved with during this bubble — unfortunately, this charlatan seems to still be up and running.

Here’s their website: http://www.marshallreddickseminars.com/mrweb/mrren/home.aspx

Here’s a blog that provides some real background:

http://www.changingmydirection.com/maison/2006/03/marshall_reddic.html

Some quotes:

“The Marshall Reddick network has been a complete diaster for my wife and myself. They make promises such as “you can’t lose money”. “We will buy it back if it does not work out”. When push comes to shove they don’t keep them. They rarely return emails or calls if there is a problem. They advised us to buy a house in Florida in 2005 that has now gone down in value 30K and the rental market is also depressed. My attorney has advised a class action lawsuit for fraudulent inducement. I would be interested in hearing details from anyone else who has been given misrepresentations about real estate investments by Marshall Reddick or his company.”

“I too have been screwed by the lies and deceptions of Marshall Reddick and his BS. The christain thing he promotes I believe is there to make people think he is religious ergo an honest man. Of course with all the religious nutbars who steel money it’s not suprising MR is one such person. I sold most of my properties and broke even or what I made over the price essentially did not cover my original closing costs and repairs and negative cash flow. They never answer calls or if they do don’t do anything. Some of the brokers were nasty. The goods onces like leave them because they aren’t willing screw the buyers. I recall one real estate broker in oregan left because he was told by MR to ignore any complaints and push his properties. The broker had a conscience and walked away. Many brokers realize they may lose their license being dishonest as to falsely advertsing what rents will be and value of the property so they leave his network. OTOH, Marshall makes sure who ever he pushes in his network he will ALWAYS get a cut. Since he doesnt have a license he is not subject to the same ethics. I do think though he needs to be investigated and sued in a class action suit. It irks me he made so much money based on so much fraud.”

Yikes!

Comment by A Texan in Bavaria
2007-06-01 08:11:31

As a devout Southern Baptist aunt of mine says, “The louder a business man hollers about being Christian, the faster I shut my pocketbook!”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-06-01 08:53:08

I have this picture of a fb christian being nailed to the cross, their cross being the hangman thing that holds their for sale sign…

 
Comment by Chip
2007-06-01 22:23:27

But, aladinsane, that is because you are Jewish (or were, as in, from a Jewish family). Full disclosure is a plus, here.

 
Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 22:45:43

how do you tell one from another?>

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-06-02 08:09:13

Chip…

I’m merely largely pissed off at the cabal of dogma know nothings that have done their utmost to wreck our country, the past long 6+ years.

And sadly, they aren’t done yet.

About Jews?

I have nothing but admiration for their brand of smart, although i’m not one.

 
 
Comment by tcm_guy
2007-06-01 11:50:59

This organization is akin to a religious cult. The people at the top are very charismatic and manipulative, and are judged to be of very high moral Christian fiber by their followers. They spend a small part of their obscene profits on local charities, little league, Republican politicians, radio personal finance types, etc. This allows them to rule their cult with an iron fist. Many MLMs are run like this also.

Got 10% down?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by joe
2007-06-01 06:23:03

Just walk away from the contract & surrender your deposit as liquidated damages.

Take your contract to a real estate attorney and see if there are clauses/contingencies that will get you out of the deal with your deposit. (e.g. mortgage/financing contingency; appraisal contingency).

If you do not but if there is a lack of “mutuality of obligation” (legal term/phrase) then the contract can be voided and you’ll get your money back, technically. You’ll have to pay your lawyer and the construction company will fight you in the courts, but it beats being stuck with a debt trap that will ruin you financially.

“mutuality of obligation” means that both parities to a contract must each have obligations to perform under the contract. Construction company lawyers are soo focused on putting everything on the buyer while letting them walk away from the deal without penalty that they forgot about this legal requirement. Its gotten several people out of similar situations here in DC. Go to washingtonpost.com and search for the article. Good Luck. Joe

Comment by Mikey(2)
2007-06-01 07:05:06

Isn’t the construction company’s obligation to construct and reserve the property for the buyer? Seems like this was a “calculated” risk on the part of the buyer; no small print hides that fact.

 
Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 23:13:34

I advised a client/good friend to walk instead of fullfill the contract.

he thanks me to this day.

 
 
Comment by turdly
2007-06-01 09:38:38

Wow, that’s tough. Who told you to invest? who told you that any home was worth more than 120 times rental or 2.5 times annual income? That’s who I would be mad at. Certainly you went to counseling somewhere before you bought that house. I’d sue the church. They promise everlasting life, and yet can’t prove a thing. Grow up! you bet it all you lost it all, you pitifull ass whiner! How dare you have any indignation whatsoever! You’re the problem! Mommy left you some money when she passed and it made you ‘rich and edumadated’. Welcome to the pyramid. Those of who aren’t stupid reach the top by stnading on the backs and bodies of YOU! We’ll buy that place at 50% of value[ nad a positive rental flow] so I guess I have to say ‘thanks, i can see my house from here. Pompous ass!

Comment by not a gator
2007-06-01 09:48:35

What profits a man, if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?

(take that in a poetic sense–I’m an atheist too)

Comment by turdly
2007-06-01 10:02:35

As an agnostic that studies religion [know thine enemy' 8-)] I find it odd that there are very few RED words [many bibles list the actual words of Jesus in RED]. Of the few there are, the ones I like the best; [paraphrasing here] ‘GO INTO YOUR CLOSETS TO PRAY LEST YE BE KNOWN AS HYPOCRITS’. Isn’t that, in essence, ‘just shut the hell up, it makes you look stupid to those not infected’?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Darrell_in _PHX
2007-06-01 12:51:00

That’s part of te sermon on the mount? Yes.

I think the meaning is pretty straight forward. Jesus considered those that went to chruch, but did not practice kindness and charity to be hyprocrits.

They go to church and yell thier belief and ask God for things, but they do not practice what they preach. They are hyprocrits.

Jesus was telling his followers that you don’t have to go to church and tell everyone you’re a believer and that you shouldn’t ask God for what you want, because he already knows what you need. That your relationship with God should be personal, and done in the privacy of your own home.

Of course, no cash or power in that for the church, so no “religion” really does much focusing on the whole, don’t go to church, just give glory to God in private portion of Jesus’s preachings.

 
Comment by turdly
2007-06-01 13:36:12

Well, that was certainly kinder than I phrased it. Thank you.
An odd thing about the Sermon on the Mount. A follower couldn’t make it up the hill, and asked Jesus what he should do. Jesus said ‘if you can’t follow me, follow my ways.’. Of course King James had to leave that one out as it represented a back door to heaven. Also strange is that Jesus met the devil during his trip to the hill. That’s where ‘man does not live by bread alone’ comes from. Sure coulda been a shorter book if Jesus had just kicked the devils ass when he had a chance standing there face to face and all. Hell Cartman or Kyle woulda took a shot…. But, my wife says that’s why I’m not allowed to write screenplays….

 
 
 
 
Comment by turdly
2007-06-01 09:38:38

Wow, that’s tough. Who told you to invest? who told you that any home was worth more than 120 times rental or 2.5 times annual income? That’s who I would be mad at. Certainly you went to counseling somewhere before you bought that house. I’d sue the church. They promise everlasting life, and yet can’t prove a thing. Grow up! you bet it all you lost it all, you pitifull ass whiner! How dare you have any indignation whatsoever! You’re the problem! Mommy left you some money when she passed and it made you ‘rich and edumadated’. Welcome to the pyramid. Those of who aren’t stupid reach the top by stnading on the backs and bodies of YOU! We’ll buy that place at 50% of value[ nad a positive rental flow] so I guess I have to say ‘thanks, i can see my house from here. Pompous ass!

 
Comment by tcm_guy
2007-06-01 12:02:56

He bought it for $40k below the appraisal, a bargain! Besides, in 40 years it will be worth 20 times what he paid for it!

The NAR has got many, many more knife catchers all lined up behind this idiot.

Got 10% down?

 
 
Comment by packman
2007-06-01 06:16:11

Quarterly HPI data came out last night -

http://www.ofheo.gov/download.asp

Not much in the way of surprises. Some areas are still increasing quite a fair amount - Asheville NC, Salt Lake City, Seattle. Contrary to what some have said on this board though - San Jose is indeed going down. Western Florida areas are probably leading the downturn with the highest drops.

Overall U.S. average (just an average of all areas - not weighted by population) is still going up slightly, but the rate of increase is way down, and will probably be below zero in Q2. It looks like this the last few quarters:

Quarter Avg Delta
2005 Q4 190.6 5.2
2006 Q1 194.3 3.7
2006 Q2 197.4 3.1
2006 Q3 200.1 2.7
2006 Q4 202.2 2.1
2007 Q1 203.0 0.8

Comment by packman
2007-06-01 06:21:59

Meant to say that one surprise to me is that Miami is still on the rise, though Ft. Lauderdale has been going down after peaking mid last year. Miami may end up overtaking Naples as the highest peaked HPI in the country before it’s said and done.

Comment by packman
2007-06-01 06:25:22

Oops - correction - Salinas is #1 (peak HPI 362.17), Naples a close second (peak HPI 361.15). Miami as at 347.73 but still rising. I don’t think they’ll make it though.

 
Comment by Ft Lauderdale
2007-06-01 06:26:52

That is surprising. doesn’t look that way “on the ground”

2007-06-01 07:28:42

I thought the same thing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by ubaldus
2007-06-01 06:36:42

My observation is that sfh prices in Miami (especially better neighbourhoods) are holding quite well. Don’t know what is holding them - foreign money perhaps.

Comment by Ft Lauderdale
2007-06-01 07:56:45

could be, I also think that so few transactions are taking place the average may be holding up because a few large transactions.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by JBravo
2007-06-01 09:43:07

All Realtor Sales by city for all South Fl http://statspak.firstamericanmls.com/RAMDCStat/

 
 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 06:53:18

“Not much in the way of surprises.”

Not much in the way of information. Why bother even discussing an index which is seriously biased, due to truncating the top of the bubble price distribution out of the sample? Case-Shiller S&P is much more plausible as a measure of current pricing.

Comment by packman
2007-06-01 07:33:19

Does Case-Shiller provide the raw data? I haven’t been able to find that - if you know please let me know. That’s one nice thing about the OFHEO data.

And while the OFHEO does truncate, this is only with respect to mortgage amounts, not to home prices. Those that buy homes with higher than $475 value but lower than $475 mortgage (e.g. me) are included, thus it does include a sampling of higher-priced homes.

Plus it provides the longest-term data I’ve seen, at least in detail - back to 1975. My observation is that it’s been a pretty good indicator of long term trends, e.g. the early-90’s mini-bubble and what areas were affected most (SD), and the weird anomalies of Salt Lake City and Honolulu, and gives a good indicator of the scale of the current bubble and which areas are affected most. It’s pretty much inline with Case-Shiller though does lag by about 3-6 months.

Comment by PDXrenter
2007-06-01 07:50:50

And while the OFHEO does truncate, this is only with respect to mortgage amounts, not to home prices. Those that buy homes with higher than $475 value but lower than $475 mortgage (e.g. me) are included, thus it does include a sampling of higher-priced homes.

and it misses precisely the segment (high LTV) that is cratering.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by BP
2007-06-01 07:02:29

I can report that Asheville sales have finally slowed down. Thirteen homes for sale in my neighborhood for more than a $1 million. When we moved here 2 1/2 years ago those same homes were in the 700-800 range.

 
Comment by David
2007-06-01 10:44:08

ofheo data is complete garbage. It includes appraisals for refis (completly manipulated data), and excludes jumbos (anything over $420k which is 80% california)

 
 
Comment by spike66
2007-06-01 06:27:37

From the NYTImes…Big Money Jumping Back Into Subprime.

“The subprime mortgage business is in tatters: loan volume is plummeting, defaults are rising and some of the biggest lenders have cut back or shut down.
So what is the smart money — private equity, hedge funds and investment banks — doing? They are swooping in and taking over those battered businesses, seeing opportunity amid the wreckage.
“There is a lot of money pent up,” said Steve Probst, national sales manager with Fairway Independent Mortgage, a lender based in Sun Prairie, Wis. “And a lot of people are betting that the market will snap back quickly.”
It is a risky proposition…”

Comment by palmetto
2007-06-01 06:31:19

“So what is the smart money — private equity, hedge funds and investment banks — doing? They are swooping in and taking over those battered businesses, seeing opportunity amid the wreckage.”

Buying up bad debt. What do you want to bet private equity will find a way to ensure it is made good? How? Private enforcers. Blackwater will make a “killing”, no pun intended.

Comment by in Colorado
2007-06-01 07:12:24

I can visualize the “deal”:

You turn over your entire paycheck to us, after taking our cut to cover your 200 year mortgage we will pay you back the balance in our XYZ hedge fund fun bucks, which we will gladly accept at our company owned stores.

A little neo-feudalism perhaps

 
Comment by David
2007-06-01 10:55:18

not necessarily. These guys could be drinking their own koolade. Like the top performing realtor who buys 4 houses for investment, or the top performing load officer who refis to buy cars and vacations.

 
 
Comment by spike66
2007-06-01 06:31:56

Sorry, here’s the link. Says the deal-making will make Cerberus the biggest subprime lender in the country, dwarfing CFC, Wells, etc.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/01/business/01subprime.html?ref=business

Comment by aladinsane
2007-06-01 06:40:46

A visual of the beastie that is/was cerbeus…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Cerberus-Blake.jpeg

Hell’s Hound

 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2007-06-01 06:51:00

Article in WSJ today points out that hedge funds aren’t even making the same return as stock index funds. Some are even losing money on a regular basis. The hedge managers have to do something to try to reverse their fortunes. Buying distressed assets in the faint hope of turning them around or being able to repackage and unload them to other suspecting buyers at a profit is a strategy. About the same strategy as a drowning man grasping at straws.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2007-06-01 06:52:53

Make that “unsuspecting buyers.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by palmetto
2007-06-01 07:13:49

” hedge funds aren’t even making the same return as stock index funds. Some are even losing money on a regular basis.”

Really? That’s the best news I’ve had in ages. I hope hedge funds end up being a failed experiment. Actually, if it hadn’t been for the bailout that LCTM got years back, they would have been.

This is what annoys the snot out of me, the institutional fixes that big entities get. It masks the true state of affairs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 22:47:59

you want bailoput loss? try some UAL post 911, and pre Bankruptcy…..its $30 stock..

 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 06:51:29

Cerberus = private partner w/PPT?

Comment by Craven Moorehead
2007-06-01 07:01:32

Looking at the play they just made on Chrysler (dead man walking), you gotta wonder. And with a leadership deeply intertwined with the Treasury…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 07:10:46

At least it is the private sector that is bailing out Chrysler this time instead of the govt (at least that is what appears to be happening, which is important in a psychology-driven economy…).

 
Comment by in Colorado
2007-06-01 07:15:37

We know that they are going to gut Chrysler and offshore everything but corporate HQ. I really don’t see how they can make money on sub-prime unless they are buying the bad loans for 1 penny on the dollar.

 
 
Comment by MGNYC
2007-06-01 07:26:24

dan quayle sits on their board and cheney is a major investor
what do you think?????

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by MGNYC
2007-06-01 07:24:03

A CLOSE FRIEND O F MINE WORKS AT CERBERUS

guess what he and the wife are doing this summer?
spending 3 months in malibu while their 3 bedroom
private roofdeck apt. in th west village sits empty

cerberus is freaking huge

 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
2007-06-01 06:30:45

Pinellas County is smoky again today. Florida real estate is literally on fire!

Comment by Chip
2007-06-01 22:29:17

Tomorrow it will be very OK.

Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 23:16:03

itl cool down with the monsoon season heating up

 
 
 
Comment by packman
2007-06-01 06:39:29

BEA stats on personal income and savings are also out for April -

http://tinyurl.com/yrfwcb

See line 28 (this is what gets the headlines) - “personal savings as a percentage of disposable personal income”. It looked for a while like this might end up heading back towards positive territory, but April was a bad month again. This has now been in the red for over 2 years (first month in the red was April ‘05).

I’m surprised to be honest. I would have thought that tightening credit over the last few months would cause this to go back up to positive territory, but it doesn’t look like it’s happening. This is getting to be really sad.

Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 06:50:26

“…tightening credit over the last few months…”

Interest rates are still too low to attract U.S. households into saving money instead of continuing to gamble on future capital gains in excess of cash flow on overvalued assets (stocks and bonds). Quite a conundrum there, neh?

Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-06-01 07:19:30

That’s why I added dividend stocks and went into T-bills. Isn’t everyone else doing this? We’re still worried about “lack of” passbook savings?

Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 07:39:16

I admit to feeling slightly superstitious whenever I see “first time since the 1930s” in print (as in “the U.S. household savings rate is negative for the …”).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2007-06-01 09:51:42

Given the state of society now versus then, this may vindicate the long-held view that loose money would have prevented the worst social ills of the Great Depression.

 
Comment by tj & the bear
2007-06-01 23:09:06

Vindicate? Loose money *caused* the Great Depression!

 
Comment by not a gator
2007-06-02 07:39:47

Yeah, I know… I mean, the view that over-tightening after the crash caused a “big squeeze” economically, one which caused many good banks and good businesses to go under… it’s like someone who falls off the wagon and then goes fundy to compensate for a while.

 
 
 
Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 23:19:15

relative to the Asian markets, the DOW/NASDAQ/S&P/RUSSELL are tame………pork fried rice is running longer and faster..

why did US market run after a “Ploitical” move to slow the Chinese?

ANti-Counter Spin?

 
 
Comment by Cobradriver
2007-06-01 07:10:28

packman,

I guess the question i have about those stats is how they figure 401k’s. I have 4-6 months pay in short term cd’s all the time. I will max out my 401 at 15.5k this year. I don’t even have a regular savings account…So does this put me in the area of a negative saver ??? Does the money in my checking account count ???

I’m not trying to defend the negative number but i do wonder how accurate it is sometimes…

Chris

Comment by packman
2007-06-01 07:22:57

I’m not an accounting nerd but I’m sure the stats include income that goes to savings or to checking - both would be considered disposable. And I would imagine (hope) that the savings rate includes your 401(k) - so you would very much be a positive saver I’m sure.

Comment by ajas
2007-06-01 09:55:27

right, but the profit you make from investments already in your 401 are not counted toward savings. So putting money in = savings, money growing on its own = not savings. That’s the way I understand it.

Negative savings comes from spending non-income money… Baby-boomers prespending their retirement, or racking up credit card debt and rolling it into a refi. The refi route is cut off, but there will be no end to the boomer spending, since they know exactly what money awaits in a couple years.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by NovaWatcher
2007-06-01 10:48:18

I don’t think that it includes 401ks. 403bs, iras, etc.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NovaWatcher
2007-06-01 10:49:49

Correction: Unrealized capital gains in houses, IRA’s, 401K’s, etc. are not included in the savings rate. Money you put into IRA’s and 401K’s is included. So, yes, the $15k you put into your 401k last year counted as savings.

 
Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 23:20:52

for that much?

how old?

 
 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 07:51:31

These lines in that BEA report grabbed my attention (the four numbers across each row are for Jan 07, Feb 07, Mar 07, Apr 07) …

27 Equals: Personal saving -83.8 -95.3 -67.8 -132.8

28 Personal saving as a percentage of
disposable personal income -0.9 -1.0 -0.7 -1.3

Call me superstitious if you like, but I believe the doubling of those negative personal savings numbers from March 2007 to April 2007 is a bad sign.

Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 08:15:26

Professor Bear’s interpretation: The current bull run on the stock market has sucked in debt-financed purchases of stock, in a giant dead cat bounce off the tech stock bust of the early 2000s.

Comment by Chip
2007-06-01 22:31:41

“Professor Bear?” We haven’t hear from him in way more than a year. I truly believed that he was reincarnated as Robert Cote, but never read an admission to that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by not a gator
2007-06-01 09:44:46

What surprises me is that so little of the outlays after taxes are interest payments.

The US gov’t and many entities groan under the weight of their debt service, but the aggregate US household is not. Looks like about 3% of disposable income.

So why the f*** are Americans spending more than they earn? Irrational exuberance?

There’s a book from the 1990’s called “Luxury Fever” which posited that the greater disparity in incomes was fueling a spending arms race. (After all, human beings do have rational reasons to compete in consumption–to improve their reproductive chances and improve the survival of their offspring.) What he wrote in the mid-90’s is just as applicable today, if not more so.

He suggested that government redistribution might ameliorate this situation. I think he discussed and dismissed progressive taxes and championed consumption taxes (which have been implemented successfully in Europe, since the VAT rebate system creates a disincentive to do business with tax cheats–unless, of course, everyone is cheating, as in Spain).

What gets me, though, is that there have been societies before where income was unfairly distributed (I’m going to say it’s unfair when the infant mortality rate for the poor is atrocious while those born into wealth live lives of idle leisure–I’ll go further and call it sick), and yet the savings rate was not negative but positive. Perhaps the difference is that in such societies as I can recall, usually only the rich had access to credit (the keys to dismantling their fortunes, unless they were powerful enough to simply stiff their creditors–it was helpful when the lenders were Jews and one could simply whip up a progrom and have them run out of town rather than pay one’s bills).

In this context, the gov’t is really smoking crack if they think that access to credit is proof of the bounty of their democracy. Debt slavery has not died out on this Earth. What newspeak to refer to the burden of debt as the freedom of a low monthly payment? A sorely burdened nation cries out for a paradigm shift.

Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 23:24:03

to have what the haves “have”

from all one, from one all.

thats not a pradigm shift, thats

ANARCHY

 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2007-06-01 06:41:35

Another one dumps the buck:
http://tinyurl.com/2cbxgp

I also see that Dell is cutting 8800 jobs. That won’t help real estate in Texas.

 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2007-06-01 06:42:18

Looks like Lawrence Yun is picking up where Lireah left off. Buy now in Sarasota or be priced out forever.

http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070601/REALESTATE/706010530

Comment by Lionel
2007-06-01 07:00:03

My favorite quote from the article on Yun:

“During the next 40 years, Southwest Florida homeowners will enjoy values about 20 times higher than now.

That would mean a $500,000 home bought today will be worth about $10 million in 2045, or double the national appreciation average, Yun said.”

Comment by in Colorado
2007-06-01 07:18:35

And the average wage in 2045 will be $9 per hour.

Comment by Michael
2007-06-01 12:55:56

in 2045 nobody will accept any $s for any payment.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by packman
2007-06-01 07:18:59

That much gain in 40 years is equivalent to 7.5% per year.

Given that:
- Real estate historically has risen about 5% per year
- We’re starting off on the wrong foot by going *down* for the next 3-5 years at least

he’s off his rocker.

More realistic would be $2.5M after 40 years, assuming the economy eventually recovers back to normal sometime within the next 10-15 years.

Just the fact that he’s making such a statement (even if it were true) proves him to be a big hype artist. That being said - it’s sad how many Americans are influenceable by hype artists.

 
Comment by in Colorado
2007-06-01 07:22:22

Or maybe he’s factoring in the inevitable hyper inflation we will be experiencing soon. So a gallon of milk will be $60 and a 1 day pass at DisneyWorld will be over $1000.

I lived in Mexico when it went through its hyperinflation period. It was a surreal experience.

Comment by az_lender
2007-06-01 08:16:14

A good reason for each of us to have plenty of assets denominated in foreign currency.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2007-06-01 10:42:16

But keep them hidden in a safe place. For a brief period in the early 80’s it was illegal to possess foreign currency in Mexico. Tourists were forced to convert all their dollars (cash and travellers checks) into pesos upon entry, with the promise that upon exit any leftover pesos would be reconverted back into whatever they had to begin with. Also, dollar based accounts in Mexican banks (AKA Mexdollars) were forcibly converted into pesos at a highway robbery exchange rate. People hoarded gold coins (Centenarios) to protect their liquid assets.

 
 
Comment by Chip
2007-06-01 22:34:21

“Or maybe he’s factoring in the inevitable hyper inflation we will be experiencing soon.”

That, to me, is the only rational explanation for his viewpoint. Most unfortunately, it is an insider’s viewpoint.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by tcm_guy
2007-06-01 11:36:20

Something for Mr. Yun to think about:

If Southwest FL RE spends the next 15 years losing 75% of it’s value, then in the next 25 years it will have to gain an average compounded rate of 19.2%.

Got 10% down?

 
 
Comment by Cobradriver
2007-06-01 07:23:12

Bill in Carolina,

I saw that article in the paper that was in teh breakroom this a.m. It made my head hurt to freakin read it. All i know is someone must be making fortune on sunshine pumps because all the realtors have one stuck up their a$$…

Chris

 
 
Comment by watcher
2007-06-01 06:48:33
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 06:57:47

Never mind the subprime collapse — it is high gas prices that are killing the housing market.
————————————————————————————
Housing forecast links slump to pump
By Roger Showley
STAFF WRITER
June 1, 2007

High gas prices have started to discourage new-home buying and construction in the Inland Empire, the California Building Industry Association said in a report yesterday.

(Graphic: Construction slowdown)
Officials released a midyear housing forecast at the group’s annual convention in San Francisco that projects 135,000 to 150,000 building permits this year statewide, down from the 155,000 to 175,000 permits the association had projected in January.

Nearly half the downward revision was due to a fall-off in sales and construction in Riverside and San Bernardino counties, said its chief economist, Alan Nevin.

“There has been a massive drop as commuters from elsewhere in Southern California have stopped coming to Riverside County,” the San Diego-based economist said.

“It’s largely a function, we think, of gas prices, because most of them commute at least an hour and sometimes two to three hours a day, and (the price of) gas has just gotten to them.”

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20070601/news_1b1housing.html

Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 07:08:26

I’m sure glad the Fed is comfortable with high gas prices, as it means they won’t have to tighten rates later this year and end the current bull run on the stock market. As for myself, these gas prices are getting so high that I am thinking of buying some S&P 500 call options to offset my commuting costs.

And BTW, what’s a core price? Would the definition include the prices of core necessities like food and gasoline?
——————————————————————————-
ECONOMIC REPORT
Core inflation falls back to Fed’s comfort zone
Personal incomes fall for first time in 20 months
By Rex Nutting, MarketWatch
Last Update: 9:26 AM ET Jun 1, 2007

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Core consumer price inflation increased just 0.1% in April, bringing the year-over-year increase down to 2%, just inside the Federal Reserve’s target, the Commerce Department reported Friday.

It’s the first time in 14 months that core prices have been inside the Fed’s unofficial target zone of 1% to 2%. Core inflation peaked at 2.4% in February; it was 2.1% in March.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/inflation-falls-back-feds-comfort/story.aspx?guid=%7BAC83AE34%2DF414%2D45AD%2D96C8%2D668C7870C272%7D

Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-06-01 07:24:49

Seems that the stock market is where people should be for 2007 and 2008 (and should have been since 2003). Still no clear sign on whether we’ll have general inflation or deflation. And pundits better give me a link (proof?) when they say the real inflation rate is 8%. My counterproof to inflation: wage increases still modest. House prices have peaked. But wages are number one in my counterproof. Most of you posters, if not all, agree that RE prices will come crashing down. What’s inflationary in that? Since no amateur and no expert can honestly say what the direction is, the stock market’s “wall of worry” is where I have 60% of my net worth.

Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 07:27:40

“wage increases still modest.”

Modest wage increases + burgeoning food and gasoline prices = screwed households.

There’s your proof.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by cami
2007-06-01 07:38:12

Can’t we have stagflation, then everyone “wins”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by watcher
2007-06-01 07:44:38

Deflation is not going to happen, no way no how. Inflation is raging; if you want stats check Shadowstats. Yes, housing prices are falling, but that is after a record multi-year run. The price of everything you need is going up like crazy. Wage inflation is not an issue because of outsourcing and immigration; the new inflation is in prices and until we find a way to eat $20 DVD players or send our kids to college in China, you will pay more for everything you need. If you are 60% in US stocks you are very exposed; I just eliminated all margin debt and reduced US exposure to 40%, all energy and PMs. Good luck.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by txchick57
2007-06-01 07:57:34

In 2003 we had the “duct tape bottom” in March and general equiphobia. As usual, when something is a screaming buy, nobody wants it and the inverse is also true.

You wanna be in the stock market the rest of this year and next? Good luck with that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2007-06-01 09:58:16

The funny thing is, all spring Bill was going on and on about buying gold, so since when has he been drinking the equities Kool-aid? Since the market went up?

 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-06-01 12:38:42

I’m still buying gold. The funny thing is you did not read my posts. You conveniently forget that mentioned I buy savings bonds and T-bills, money market funds, CDs, and municipal bonds as well as equities. I guess you only read what you wanted to read. I’m going to buy a few ounces the next two months. I’ll let you know, okay?

 
Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 22:51:05

bill lkes liquid investments….long the market, no way, get some of those T-bills we are selling to China. You wanna know how a service economy competes with pre-industrialization? sell them money……..passport?

your all good.

next

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 08:35:01

“Two recalcitrant individuals refuse, for the time being, to take part in this exercise. They have no use for it at all, but no doubt sooner or later they will be brought to see the error of their noncomformity.”

http://library.thinkquest.org/25459/learning/escher/ascendingdescending.html

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by FutureVulture
2007-06-01 10:49:24

the stock market’s “wall of worry” is where I have 60% of my net worth.

Do you mean that “pebble of worry” created in February that’s since been trampled into the ground?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 22:53:03

that feb. “pebble” shook the sataying power of the Amerasian…..its complicated, a lot of ins, lotsa outs…

lotta whathaveyou

rates are going higher.

 
Comment by FutureVulture
2007-06-02 09:16:54

LOL, love The Big Lebowski.

“Vee don’t care. Vee still vant ze muhney or vee vuck you up.”

 
 
 
Comment by wawawa
2007-06-01 07:29:01

What is this horse sh!!t “Core consumer price”. I look at my house hold half of my expenses are food and energy.

Government is such a fraude and MSM is so f(*&*ing idiot to be silence about this.

Comment by watcher
2007-06-01 07:48:58

It benefits the government to keep inflation numbers down so they can keep their entitlement payments down. Let the seniors eat cat chow.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jay_Huhman
2007-06-01 08:42:12

The Social Security adjustments are based not on core CPI but on CPI-U.

 
Comment by watcher
2007-06-01 10:10:24

Jay,
Which do they calculate TIPS payments from?

 
Comment by Jay_Huhman
2007-06-01 12:34:22
 
 
 
Comment by Bill
2007-06-01 09:35:32

Despite the “low core inflation” the 10-year treasury bond is really taking off today, up 0.06 or 1.2%. The bond has been breaking out over the last two weeks. Most mortgage rates track the 10-year T bonds, so this will lead to less affordability and difficulty in refinancing. If I were buying a house, I would be more concerned about interest rates than gasoline, unless the compute was a long one.

Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 22:54:21

nice take

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2007-06-01 07:07:24

pending home sales -3.2 v. 0.3 exp

Comment by ozajh
2007-06-01 07:26:44

That sounds like a pretty significant miss.

Comment by PDXrenter
2007-06-01 07:37:33

And consider how many of these pending sales will get canceled as some of the greater fools regain their senses BEFORE the falling knives slice their hands.

You know it’s bad when even Lawrence Yun of NAR admits “Psychological factors seem to be holding buyers back as they look for clear signs that the market has bottomed…” and David Seiders of NAHB admits this time it’s different:
New home construction in the U.S. may not return to last year’s level until 2011, said David Seiders, chief economist for the National Association of Home Builders, in a May 29 interview in Washington.

“We’ve fallen way below trend because we soared way above trend during boom times,” Seiders said. “The upswing will be relatively slow, unlike earlier cycles.”

Comment by PDXrenter
2007-06-01 07:38:50

quotes are from Bloomberg, BTW.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by not a gator
2007-06-01 09:59:35

airball :)

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 07:30:02

ECONOMIC REPORT
Pending home sales fall in April, Realtors say
By Robert Schroeder, MarketWatch
Last Update: 10:22 AM ET Jun 1, 2007

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Pending sales of U.S. homes fell by 3.2% in April, the National Association of Realtors said Friday, with sales in the West and Northeastern regions of the country marking big drops. The pending home sales index is 10.2% lower than a year ago, the Realtors said.

But an economist with the group said the index suggests the housing market will stabilize.

“For the past two months the pending home sales index has been similar in year-ago comparisons, which means home sales might ease but should be fairly stable in the months ahead,” said Lawrence Yun, NAR senior economist.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/economic-report-pending-home-sales/story.aspx?guid=%7B1ACC2088%2D3EDE%2D4B3B%2D90C5%2DF31474E62068%7D&dist=hplatest

Comment by Groundhogday
2007-06-01 10:23:34

Isn’t it fun to watch these guys find bizarre ways to spin negative news. We have two months of terrible sales data, but these TWO MONTHS are consistently down relatively to last year so that means we are “stablizing”.

 
 
 
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2007-06-01 07:13:01

I noticed that so far today (about 45 minutes into the trading session) bond yields are up. The 30-year is up over 5% (5.02%) and the 10-year is up to 4.91%. Will the 10-year hit 5% by the end of next week?

Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 07:26:12

I don’t expect those l-t T-bond rates to get much above 5% at the moment. They are behaving as though some powerful financial entity is capping the inflation risk premium.

Comment by HK_Vol
2007-06-01 07:50:51

Japanese 2-year govt. bond hit 1% earlier today.
Highest interest rate the 2 year has seen in a decade.
Most Japanese real estate funds that leverage 80-90% borrow vs. 2 or 3 year paper. 50% leverage can borrow against 5-7 year paper.
Watch Japan rates as well.

 
Comment by watcher
2007-06-01 07:52:16

You don’t believe those Caribbean banks buying gazillions of dollars worth of Treasuries are the end-users? Maybe if they gave the poor Bahamians all those paper bonds they could build houses with them.

Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 08:20:46

Didn’t Enron have offshore debt-eating subsidiaries that hid unlimited amounts of negative results out of sight from the shareholders?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Mike_in_Fl
2007-06-01 08:56:01

If you’re a chart guy, today’s bond market action looks pretty darn signficant. We’re breaking down from a 10-month range in bond prices, and the 10-year is breaking out above 4.9%. If we close here, I wouldn’t be surprised to see 10-year yields work their way up toward the old cycle high (around 5.25%). As always, we’ll see…

Comment by SDMisfit
2007-06-01 10:27:13

The 5% threshold was supposed to trigger the definitive end of the bubble, but nothing happened the last time it made it above 5%. In fact it meekly came right back down. What will be different this time?

Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 22:57:56

inflation. and the rest of the “civilized” world RASING.

a global tightening will shake out the fields of food vs. up from the ground bubbly..

how does a service economy compete with a pre-industrial (post agrarian) economy?

WE SELL PAPER…

passport..

next

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by paul
2007-06-01 07:15:37

How to fix the subprime mess?

Do Nothing!

Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 07:25:12

Politicians don’t have that option, do they? How would you like to get labeled as a “do-nothing Congressman?”

Comment by 85249 is Toast
2007-06-01 15:58:30

I’d vote for that man.

Comment by Chip
2007-06-01 22:37:48

His name is Ron Paul. Awesome guy, IMO.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-06-01 07:28:14

Last I checked at 7:25 pacific time, 10 year note is at 4.94, 30 year bond is at 5.042, 5 year note is at 4.91 and 13-week treasury bill is at 4.64.

Where is the “inverted yield curve” that signals recession?

Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 07:44:38

There is clearly upward pressure on bond yields from the market, but the yield curve tends to clamp down at day’s end as though a giant foot had stepped on it (the opposite movement from the tendency of headline stock market indexes to magically jump back up to the opening bell level on days when they sell off).

http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates/index.html

Comment by txchick57
2007-06-01 08:54:32

Well, as someone smarter dan me just said, if that horse gets out the barn, it’s got a long way to run.

 
 
Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 22:58:55

IM STILL SAYIN RECESSION STARTED Q 4

2006

 
 
Comment by Mikey(2)
2007-06-01 07:34:02

Okay, the seller of the house that I’ve had my eye on for the last year has lowered his price by 4.5%. Woo f-ing hoo. He’s now down to the price that he lowered it to last year before he put in the granite countertops on the 40-yo cabinets, slapped some marble tile around the 40-yo bathroom fixtures, installed replacement windows, and added central air. At this point, he’s lost all of the money that he spent on the improvements and has lost whatever interest he could have earned on the cash had he sold last year (what’s that money called?), $13K in taxes (he’s living elsewhere, my guess is that he bought the new place with the expected equity on this house). And the property is still about 20% overpriced (in my opinion). How can I get this place at the 80% price - seems like he’s willing to just keep lowering his price in small increments until someone bites?

Comment by HK_Vol
2007-06-01 07:52:39

Patience grasshopper….

 
Comment by arroyogrande
2007-06-01 08:30:09

“whatever interest he could have earned on the cash had he sold last year (what’s that money called?”

Opportunity costs.

Comment by Mikey(2)
2007-06-01 10:17:54

Tx!

 
 
Comment by phillygal
2007-06-01 08:41:15

Maybe while this guy takes his time in lowering the price you’ll see another home you like better, priced right?

It could happen.

Comment by lost in utah
2007-06-01 10:16:53

Your best bet wouold be to turn him on to this blog…

 
 
Comment by az_owner
2007-06-01 11:29:48

“How can I get this place at the 80% price”

Offer him 60% and wait.

 
 
Comment by Mike
2007-06-01 07:43:43

It’s okay, folks. The readjusted government numbers are out on employment. Lot more jobs created. Unemployment low. Stock market hitting new highs. Inflation well within the Fed’s comfort zone. Consumers still spending.

According to the shills on CNBC’s Comedy Business Channel, the slowdown (one moron actually used the word recession) is over. This means that all the housing excess inventory will be absorbed. Plenty of employment which means those average $15 an hour jobs will rise to $100 an hour and people will be able to afford $600,000 houses. Jeeez. How do you spell h-y-p-e and m-a-n-i-p-u-l-a-t-i-o-n and b-r-a-i-n-w-a-s-h-e-d.

Also, it appears that construction unemployment has only suffered a small drop. Oh, so that’s one of the ways that cook the books! They don’t count the thousands of undocumented illegals who made up a large part of the booming construction business over the last 5 years, are now looking for work AND they don’t sign on the unemployment rolls.

Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 08:17:27

“How do you spell h-y-p-e and m-a-n-i-p-u-l-a-t-i-o-n and b-r-a-i-n-w-a-s-h-e-d.”

I spell it t-r-a-n-s-p-a-r-e-n-t-l-y o-r-c-h-e-s-t-r-a-t-e-d.

Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 23:00:02

T-H-A-N-K

Y-O-U

 
 
Comment by ronin
2007-06-01 09:13:25

Question: Why is ANY inflation in anyone’s comfort zone? Why is it even in the Fed’s comfort zone?

I mean, steadily losing the value of your savings, your 401k’s, your purchasing power, year after year, puts you in a ‘comfort zone?’

I understand debtors like the fed gov like inflation because debts are paid back with cheaper dollars. Oh wait, in their case debts are not paid back.

I’m beginning to think the main purpose of the Fed is to be one big inflation engine. And after decades of hearing about ‘good inflation,’ we don’t even think to ask any more how is any inflation, any at all, good for the regular guy?

Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 09:29:57

“Why is it even in the Fed’s comfort zone?”

Because they mortally fear deflation. Any inflation level close to 0% would potentially tip the savings rate back into positive territory, at which point the U.S. economy could quickly begin to resemble Japan’s from 1990-2005, including sixteen straight years of positive real returns on money stuffed under the mattress, coupled with
falling housing prices. This is the Fed’s hobgoblin, and they will do anything in their power to keep inflation to the positive side of 0% in order to avoid it.

Comment by MBRenter
2007-06-01 10:14:48

Here’s what I don’t get.

Inflation goes to (close to zero). Savings level goes up. Prices go down.

To compensate, raise income taxes. Start running a government surplus again. Cut earmarks. Start paying off the national debt. Sell fewer 30-year bonds.

Is this not the greatest possible scenario for getting the country back onto a strong footing? People suck up higher taxes for a while, complain like crazy, but if the country becomes a better place overall, it’s worth the short-term pain.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by az_owner
2007-06-01 11:37:11

Debt must be destroyed through inflation, or there is no business investment or borrowing. The whole financial system is based on banks lending new fiat money to businesses and individuals. I actually read an analysis of the beneifts of 2% inflation - can’t remember where but it sort of made sense - at 2% prices double in 36 years - generationally at worst and debts are continually “paid back” through inflation, allowing debtors to continue to live essentially. The problem is when inflation hits 8, 10, 15%.

Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 23:30:41

the rule of 72.

kinda like the avg life span of a male born in the USA…

2% inflation, the sum of a US male.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by technovelist
2007-06-01 13:22:07

I’m beginning to think the main purpose of the Fed is to be one big inflation engine.

Of course it is. What else could it possibly be?

Comment by Chip
2007-06-01 22:41:38

“I’m beginning to think the main purpose of the Fed is to be one big inflation engine.”
“Of course it is. What else could it possibly be?”

I agree — there is no other usefulness for its existence (usefulness in this sense not meant as a positive term.).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2007-06-01 07:59:33

Looks to me like something similar to what I saw in Feb. is happening, rotating into big tech (notice CIEN, DELL, etc.). It got derailed in Feb., hopefully will now too.

Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 23:32:43

thanks Tcchick,

Ive been wondering when to sell the NSADQ,.

monday, maybe tuesday/

 
 
Comment by tj & the bear
2007-06-01 08:00:59

txchick57,

I know the market’s driving you crazy (as it is most of us), but have you ever strayed into FOREX? Just curious.

Comment by txchick57
2007-06-01 08:29:28

No. That’s the graveyard for all the “trader” wannabes who think they’ve mastered the equity markets. I don’t even understand that sheet, and don’t wanna (insert long whine).

 
 
Comment by tj & the bear
2007-06-01 08:04:26

Heard on the radio last night that the RNC fired 65 phone solicitors. The RNC is denying it, but those fired workers are claiming donations are down over 40% due to extreme anger among the party faithful over the immigration reform bill. If there’s any truth to this, that bill is DOA when it reaches the House.

Comment by txchick57
Comment by brianb
2007-06-01 09:38:20

That’s a good article.

I voted for Bush and am ashamed I did. He makes me sick, just physically ill. I’d much rather have had Kerry. I wouldn’t agree with him on alot of things, but it’s better than being betrayed and insulted by one of your own.

I’ve thought for a long time that Bush will be the end of the republican party. Just destroyed it. Big government, international interventionism…who is this guy? He doesn’t care though, he’s abandoned the party that elected him to try to go for a “legacy” that the liberal media will love.

I hope they don’t let him speak at the convention in 08…

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2007-06-01 16:16:02

Bush has been an unmitigated disaster. Suggest reading Bob Woodward’s excellent book, “State of Denial” which shows the magnitude of the arrogance and incompetence of this administration and its handling of the Iraq war.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by brianb
2007-06-01 09:39:17

test

 
 
Comment by arroyogrande
2007-06-01 08:49:12

I can believe it. Both Dem and Repub “rank and file” have strong objections to large parts of the bill.

Comment by spike66
2007-06-01 10:09:01

Sen. Kyl, the repub senator from AZ who cosponsored the bill with Kennedy says he is “surprised” at the anger from his constituents. Anyone from AZ with an opinion?

Comment by MBRenter
2007-06-01 10:17:06

It’s simple: Arizonans mostly hate Mexicans. It’s the same way in Orange County.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-06-01 11:03:32

It’s the same way everywhere.

 
Comment by spike66
2007-06-01 11:45:57

No, what gets me is his “surprise”. How out of touch is this guy?

 
Comment by az_owner
2007-06-01 11:57:12

What a strange thing to say.

Hmmm, I wonder if it has anything to do with:

AZ has a huge ID theft problem, where “guest workers” steal SS numbers from US citizens to get jobs, apply for credit, or rent apartments.

AZ is #1 in car theft, 80% of which end up in Mexico.

AZ is #1 in unisured drivers having accidents, most of which are “guest workers”.

AZ is being fined $100 million by the federal government for not spending enough money teaching English to the illegal children of “guest workers”.

So maybe it’s really more about the crime than the nationality. But it’s much easier for you to make it about race, otherwise you’d have to address the things I mentioned, and you won’t because you have no way to counter them.

 
Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 23:04:45

those arguements are skewed.

too many “guest” workers living in the state, if USA controlled the border properly.

NO PROBLEM,

unless those same problems were not NATIONWIDe.

it is different in the Arizona Republic.

 
 
Comment by krazy bill
2007-06-01 19:09:15

Senator Kyl is either out of touch with Arizonans or is being disingenuous; every “anti-illegal immigrant” initiative or proposition that has been on our ballot since 2004 has passed by at least 2 to 1.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by bill in Phoenix
2007-06-03 15:37:19

Repubs shot themselves in the foot. I became a Repub only for the 2004 election. I returned to Libertarian. I voted Repub because the alternative was severe socialism (Gore/Kerry/typical victim pandering blaming capitalism for America’s ills). The problem with Repubs is not capitalism, but their turn away from capitalism.

Bill O’Reilly claims the immigration bill is anti-welfare. I did not hear anyone else saying that. O’Reilly is a diehard Bush supporter.

I am for complete open borders - only if there is no taxpayer support in any way to new immigrants, no matter what country they are from.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2007-06-01 16:11:23

The RNC has completely sold out the productive classes in this country. Most of my family members are lifelong Republicans, and I’m proud to say I’ve educated several into stopping all financial support for the RNC, instead steering it to deserving individual candidates from both parties (especially Ron Paul). The RNC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wall Street - let them hit up their wirepullers in the Carlyle Group or Goldman Sachs if they need funds, instead of trying to hit up the Main Street Republicans they sold down the river years ago.

As an NRA Life member I’ve ended up on some sort of Republican mailing list. I take great delight in composing furious responses to their endless phoney “polls” and fund-raising pitches.

Comment by the_voz
2007-06-01 23:07:14

curious prose for hapless foes?

 
 
 
Comment by Chip
2007-06-01 08:56:20

I’m interested in making a seriously-lowball offer on a new house. Fairly high-end “custom” (nice-quality spec) builder, neighborhood is almost built out and he has two unsold houses remaining there. He has several houses in the ground in a new, 50-100%-more-expensive development in the area — his debt covenants must feel like 5-sizes too small underwear. The amount of my offer would be that which I can pay 100% cash for, so it would be a fast, easy closing.

The problem: My offer will be about a third off the original asking price and would be way lower per foot than anything else new has sold for. He will be desperate to avoid being the one to screw the comps for the neighborhood, because that would instill fear in buyers looking at the newer development.

My question: If he suggests a cash-back contract, so that the net cost to me is what I am willing to pay and I accept that for a few years I pay a little too much in property tax, is there anything I’m not thinking about that could bite me? There would be no lender involved, and if I were to take out a loan later it would be under 50% LTV. Do not want touch this if it would be a legal issue and I suppose that is what worries me a little — it posts a misleading price in the “sold” records. That used to be legal here, by buying excess tax stamps, but you can’t do that anymore.

Thanks for your thoughts.

Comment by turdly
2007-06-01 09:48:47

‘That used to be legal here, by buying excess tax stamps, but you can’t do that anymore.’

And you still have a question? You want a justification for breaking the law. Screwy law though it may be…..

 
Comment by lost in utah
2007-06-01 10:23:34

Don’t let your emotions sell you on this house. You’ve waited this long, it’s just beginning to slide, why jump now? If you do, you’ll have a lot lot farther to fall. Wait. Don’t do it. Go drive around in msome new neighborhoods for perspective. Go to the more expensive ones and see what you’ll be able to get if you just wait a while. And why for God’s sake would you even consider going on the line to help save the neighborhood comps?

Comment by Chip
2007-06-01 12:17:30

“why for God’s sake would you even consider going on the line to help save the neighborhood comps?”

Wouldn’t if it is not OK. But I’m pretty certain the builder will eat the place before he’ll torpedo the neighborhood precisely because he is building a lot of bigger, more expensive ones nearby. We all know, from many discussions here, that cash-back at closing represents fraud IF a lender is involved and if the cash-back is not plainly disclosed to the lender. My question is, is it fraud if there is no lender? I probably confused the issue with my comment about tax stamps - that was here in Florida and the house I’m looking at is in Georgia. I suppose the only good way to find out is to pay a lawyer there to tell me.

Also re waiting — this neighborhood is built out and my wife places a high premium on brand-new over used. The Wife Tax is a fact of life.

Comment by lost in utah
2007-06-01 12:58:09

WELL, you have to consider all the angles, which an outsider can’t really do. As for fraud, why would it be fraud? Perhapd from tax purposes, but why would they complain if it results in them getting more taxes? I would call an attorney before I went through with it, though.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Chip
2007-06-01 13:23:13

Yeah, I’ll do that. We have lawyers post here from time to time — hoped to get an unofficial view from one of them. I’m also bothered by the ethics of it, else I wouldn’t have asked. It’s very difficult to be in the right position — the doctor who bought the house next to this one paid about 30% over asking price; there’s no way I’ll believe that was all upgrades to a completely finished house (I had looked at it). Being a doctor, though, he’ll be able to pay the mortgage and the mark-up will never be questioned. Me, I just want to have overpaid the least when it all hits bottom. Wanted to build, but my wife is too afraid to do that and I don’t know how a guy convinces a woman to believe it’s OK when she doesn’t want to believe it.

 
Comment by lost in utah
2007-06-01 13:38:19

Well, as a woman (and Scotts Irish to boot), I can only say that you probably couldn’t convince her, so go for the next best scenario. Keep her happy (we women have to stick together!) and best of luck!

 
Comment by Chip
2007-06-01 14:27:36

LOL — mine’s 100% German and a Taurus, to boot. Things my dad never told me.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by turdly
2007-06-01 10:30:00

‘I’m interested in making a seriously lowball…’
The post makes more sense this way;’
I’m interested in TAKING a seriously-lowball…

That would explain the ’save the comps/chumps’

 
Comment by NOVA Renter
2007-06-01 12:22:32

D R Horton has a comp buster for all those who are part of the 12 months inventory in NOVA’s P.W. County. This kills 95% of what’s in MLS or Craigslist
http://www.drhorton.com/corp/GetCommunity.do?dv=14&pr=42029

The Brookeshire Priced from: $329,990
2,586 sqft / 3 bdr / 2 1/2 bath / 2 story / 1 car garage

 
Comment by NOVA Renter
2007-06-01 12:23:56

D R Horton has a comp buster for all those who are part of the 12 months inventory in P.W. County. This kills 95% of what’s in MLS or Craigslist
http://www.drhorton.com/corp/GetCommunity.do?dv=14&pr=42029

The Brookeshire Priced from: $329,990
2,586 sqft / 3 bdr / 2 1/2 bath / 2 story / 1 car garage

Comment by mg
2007-06-02 00:59:07

http://www.drhorton.com/corp/GetCommunity.do?dv=14&pr=41800

The Richmond Priced from: $399,990
2,408 sqft / 4 bdr / 2 1/2 bath / 3 story / 2 car garage

SFR Gainesville

Can it go much lower?

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-06-01 13:11:16

Minyanville’s Boo Looks at Housing Stabilization on Hoofy & Boo’s News & Views

http://www.minyanville.com/articles/Labor-Butler-Home+Sales-MVTV/index/a/12990

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2007-06-01 13:58:43

http://www.ppar.com/public/stats_public.asp

Pikes Peak Association of Realtors has the May stats out - not pretty. Inventory up 24.8% YOY, sales down 18.4% YOU, median unchanged. Roughly the same as last month. Foreclosures for May are down slightly (294) compared to last month (307). Yawn….

 
Comment by cami
2007-06-01 14:12:24

‘Flip This House’ Star Accused of Fraud

McGee and others say Leccima’s episodes of “Flip This House,” A&E’s most popular show, were elaborate hoaxes. His friends and family were presented as potential homebuyers and “sold” signs were slapped in front of unsold houses. They say the home repairs — the lynchpin of the show — were actually quick or temporary patch jobs designed to look good on camera.

Leccima says he never claimed to own the homes. While not acknowledging his televised renovations were staged, he didn’t deny it and suggested that A&E and Departure Films, the production company that makes the show, knew exactly what he was doing.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070601/house_flipper_investigation.html?.v=1

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post