March 17, 2006

Florida Targets Second Homes For Insurance Shortfall

Some updates on the Florida housing market. “No signs point to a housing bubble in the Tallahassee market. At least that’s the thought from local appraiser Clay Ketcham. ‘If I knew if there was a bubble, I wouldn’t be here,’ Ketcham quipped. ‘I don’t think anyone knows that.’”

“The market here is doing well, he said. While there is a large inventory of homes costing $500,000 or more, there is still an active market for homes $350,000 and below. ‘I think there are some areas where you see some softening, but Tallahassee is strategically poised to grow.’”

The January median for Tallahassee was reported to be $175,500.

The Sun Sentinel. “The Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund is facing a shortfall and needs a rapid cash infusion to ensure there’s enough money for insurers to pay property damage claims from last year’s storms and replenish the account for next hurricane season, a state catastrophe fund advisory board recommended.”

“Whatever is decided, all of the state’s homeowners will ultimately pick up part of the tab because insurance companies are expected to pass on the additional costs to their customers. Already, Florida homeowners are paying down a $516 million deficit state-backed Citizens Property Insurance Corp. incurred from the 2004 hurricane season.”

“Owners of Florida vacation properties and second homes insured by Citizens Property Insurance Corp. would face a 25 percent surcharge under an insurance overhaul outlined by Florida Senate leaders.”

“The move to help keep the state’s beleaguered insurer of last resort from going broke after future hurricanes shifts a big portion of insurance costs to nonvoting, seasonal residents. Sen. Rudy Garcia defended the idea of charging owners of non-homestead properties higher rates. ‘We’re very interested in keeping our welcome sign up for the people who have vacation homes here,’ he said. ‘But should the people of Florida subsidize [nonresidents'] insurance costs?’”

“It’s unclear what portion of Citizens’ accounts are for non-homestead properties. Property records reviewed by the South Florida Sun-Sentinel indicate a substantial number of South Floridians could pay more under the Senate plan.”

“Of the 156,533 residential properties in Broward County east of Interstate 95, about 43 percent do not have homestead exemptions, property appraiser records show. In Palm Beach County, looking only at single-family homes east of Interstate 95, there are 74,506 properties, of which 25 percent are non-homestead.”

“The Senate proposal, similar to the House version, forbids Citizens from covering homes worth more than $1 million in order to reduce the company’s risk and the need for future surcharges. In September, Citizens covered about 5,500 homes valued at $1 million or more.”




RSS feed | Trackback URI

42 Comments »

Comment by Ben Jones
2006-03-17 07:58:30

Thanks to the reader who sent in the Sentinel links. The insurance issue gets to the heart of second homes and speculation. Why should the state insure thousands of redundant homes that are in harms way each season? Aren’t there enough resorts and hotels in Florida? The Tallahassee numbers show, these extra homes aren’t affordable for the people who live in the area.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2006-03-17 08:19:13

I was always shocked by the boom that was going on in southern Florida ,especially after the recent weather losses .If another bad storm comes, dont be surprised if squatters/homeless move into these vacant houses .

 
 
Comment by BigDaddy63
2006-03-17 08:22:32

I reported about a week ago that the 2nd largest inusurer is either stopping or not renewing policies, throwing thousands into the state run pool. Citizens is grossly underfunded and if another major hurrucane( read when not if) hits here, then the state will be screwed. The lucky ones not cancelled are seeing their premiums go up anywhere from 20-60 % on top of increased premiums last year.

The state has a major problem on its hands.

 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2006-03-17 08:23:15

Further, the Insurance costs burden showdown isn’t going to increase demand ….

 
Comment by Robert Cote
2006-03-17 08:31:14

This is just a case of both socialist wealth transfer schemes and “don’t tax you, don’t tax me, that that guy behind that tree.”

First the wealth transfer. Structures don’t know if there’s a homesteader inside. Neither does the hurricane. Insurance is probability, exposure, profit and loss. This idea has all the moral authority of racism. Ahh, but these people are multiple owners so they can afford it. Yeah right and if they rent the property out? The renter gets screwed.

Then the “don’t tax you…” claim. Clearly the State Ins Agency is not charging enough. There’s an answer, charge everyone more. This is what the rest of us deserve. Our private insurance cannot exist side by side with a distorted system without costing more.

I’m also fairly convinced that all hurricane insurance is woefully undercharging based on risk exposure, again another national issue. We have an insurance bubble to go with our housing bubble.

Comment by AL
2006-03-17 10:06:56

I’m not sure if renters will get screwed as its hard to pass the cost to the renters with so many available properties for lease.
—AL

Comment by Robert Cote
2006-03-17 11:17:16

I am on the fence here. I know that every time there has been a cost increase from a public policy initiative I’ve successfully passed on more than 100% of the costs to my renters. I feel the overhead of supply keeping general rents depressed but $2500/mo cash negative tract homes trying to hold on until things change recent listings just don’t compete with the $900-$1100 true long term rental properties.

My renters pay what it costs not what they want to pay. If they could pay $2500 they’d have bought homes long ago.

My point is the coming flood of supposed new offerings as the bottom drops out of the resale market won’t change the real rental market because their financial model is broken.

Comment by AL
2006-03-17 12:51:20

One thing i noticed when renting in miami from moving from boston was that in my rental range, 2K about, that all the places i looked at was neg. The place i leased was at 2500 per month and the landload stated to my agent that he was paying 2950. total cost per month. I ended up getting it for 1825.00 per month, I might of got it cheaper if i had more time but i only had 2 days in florida to find a place before going back to Boston
Now in Boston it was a different story since most places went for asking price or at least my rentals went for the price i asked.

Well I think with the above information i see investers dumping or walking away if things go really bad in FLA as most are already have neg cash flow

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by pt_barnum_bank
2006-03-17 08:31:24

Does anyone know what the cost is in Florida to insure a home against hurricane damage per $100k? Just curious.

My own opinion is that much like the discussed “greenspan put”, hurricane/flood insurance is unncessary unless of course your lender forces you to have it. The government (or more specifically, legal resident taxpayers) will bail you out from any national disaster. Why bother wasting money on insurance.

Comment by diogenes
2006-03-17 09:33:42

About 1%, plus another 2% deductible, if you need repairs.
This is based on structure cost, excluding land and foundation.

So, 200k structure, about $2000 per year, plus $4000 deductible.
That means $6000 out of pocket, if you need to do repairs.

This does not include FLOOD Insurance, which is separate.

Comment by Mike_in_FL
2006-03-17 10:35:45

I can confirm these estimates. My wife and I live in an area where one policy covers all perils (closer to the beach, you have to buy both a standard HO policy PLUS a windstorm policy … not to mention flood may be required depending on where you’re at).

We’re paying more than 2k for our homeowners policy, plus another $300 or so for flood (not required where we live, but purchased as a “just in case” thing). Throw in taxes, and we have a monthly escrow payment that’s almost half the size of the principal and interest. Bottom line: It costs a heck of a lot more to own down here than you might expect, once you add the TI part of the payment to the PI.

 
 
 
Comment by dawnal
2006-03-17 08:31:55

““Owners of Florida vacation properties and second homes insured by Citizens Property Insurance Corp. would face a 25 percent surcharge under an insurance overhaul outlined by Florida Senate leaders.”

*********************************************************************************************************

This is Brilliant! The snow birds will be flocking in now to buy all those extra condos in Southern Florida. Problem solved!

 
Comment by Left LA Behind
2006-03-17 08:40:09

Guess this kind of legislation puts a dent in the theory that foreigners and retiring boomers will save the market. Tax them enough to scare them off (not that prices alone aren’t doing that).

Comment by Notorious D.A.P.
2006-03-17 09:15:44

As time goes on, Florida will become a 3rd world country (like those on here who say that about California). You need your passport to get into Dade County these days.

If I were a retiree, I’d look at the Carolinas or Georgia. Florida has lost much of its appeal.

Comment by BL
2006-03-17 09:30:12

Ha… Most of the baby boomers I know who are getting ready to retire and live in South Florida are doing just that. Selling their homes to “investors” and buying homes and land cash up in the Carolinas.

 
 
 
Comment by flat
2006-03-17 08:45:14

word up if you be gettin Katrinahed you gets to stay in da MO-tel

 
Comment by flat
2006-03-17 08:45:17

word up if you be gettin Katrinahed you gets to stay in da MO-tel

 
Comment by BigDaddy63
2006-03-17 08:45:17

I forgot to add, not only has our home insurance premiums increased, but our auto insurance premiums have gone up as well due to the number of claims in the area. Even if you personally never made a claim, they raised your rates.

Welcome to Miami, enjoy your stay.

 
Comment by Nick818
2006-03-17 09:11:19

Off topic, but worth mentioning.

Another sign of the times for CA:

http://www.dqnews.com/RRCA0206.shtm

It seems every couple a days bad news strikes, I wonder how much longer the CAR spinners can handle this.

 
Comment by arlingtonva
2006-03-17 09:21:57

I don’t care what party you are affiliated with, if you believe in the founding American ideals, some guy with a house in the mountains in Pennsylvania shouldn’t be subsidizing the living costs of people on the coasts.

Beach property owners need to pay beach property costs.

 
Comment by John Law
2006-03-17 09:34:43

I have a list of “unique cities” that some day I’ll make a post about, guess I’ll add tallahasee to the list!

 
Comment by need 2 leave ca
2006-03-17 09:38:39

What will this 25% subsidy to do the current floppers that can’t unload their speculative albatross’s. Oh what fun is it to ride in a FB broken house. Here come the Baby Boomers to the rescue. Gee, and a 6 yr old could have seen this coming. Alnd why should someone in Talahassee, where hurricanes probably aren’t an issue subsidize the people in MIami. Should do that stuff based on a county by county basis

 
Comment by WArenter
2006-03-17 09:38:41

I agree with arlingtonva - those who live in the path of hurricanes should be the ones who pay. OTOH, this picking and chosing among those who live there seems a lot like Prop. 13 in California.

 
Comment by Tom
2006-03-17 09:39:29

What does everyone think the future of companies like this?

Freemont Investment and Loan

Wholesale Residential Lending

Fremont Investment & Loan is a nationwide wholesale lender offering non-prime first mortgages up to $1,000,000.

.
Fremont understands that non-conforming borrowers have special situations and require flexible underwriting guidelines. We offer:

Ø Competitive rates
Ø Flexibility and fast service for quick loan closing
Ø The ability to structure loans that meet both your customers’ and your objectives

.
With over $10 billion in assets, Fremont offers residential mortgage loans through a network of Wholesale Mortgage Brokers in 45 states. Our five regional business centers are located in Southern California, Northern California, New York, Illinois and Florida.

Are companies like this going to hurt? If so, how much?

I can only imagine that the inverted yield curve or a tightening one is killing them right now.

Fremont
Investment & Loan

God Bless America
Fremont Investment & Loan is a “well capitalized” financial services company committed to providing superior financial products and services. The company is focused on originating and acquiring commercial and residential real estate loans that are primarily financed through deposit accounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

At Fremont, keeping customer information secure is a top priority. The Company’s Privacy Policy defines its standards for safeguarding your personal information

FRAUD ALERT
Notice to Consumers:
Fremont Investment & Loan does not solicit loans of any type from consumers. If you are responding to a solicitation for a personal loan, please click this link.

Year-end Tax Information:
Year-end tax forms for 2005 will be mailed no later than January 17, 2006. Please allow 7 business days for delivery. Year-end interest information for our Residential Loan Servicing and Retail Banking Customers is also available through our telephone information system. Please refer to our Contact Us page for telephone numbers and follow the prompts. Please return to our web site to obtain the actual mailing date.

 
Comment by BL
2006-03-17 09:40:09

Its funny they mention Tallahassee. Its a town of about 200,000 people but yet they are building all these luxury condos that start around 300K for a one bedroom and up.
I lived in Tallahassee. 1/4 of the population are students. The average starting salary for a college grad is around 26K. The average income is extremely low. Anyone who lives there lives 20-30 minutes north of downtown. Unless you are on welfare or a student.
The local government thinks that building up all these high rise condos downtown is going to bring life into the area and create an “18 hour a day city”, not just a place that closes down at 5pm.

The truth is Tallahassee is really only active for 2 months during the legislative session. All the people buying these condos are state law makers & lobbyists who have a place to stay during session or just the investment.

Go to Realtor.com and look up condos in Tallahassee over 200K there are all these listings that just show artists versions of what its going to look like, some even have a picture of the picture of what an artist thinks its going to look like but yet they are asking 250-300K starting.

Comment by hd74man
2006-03-17 13:01:01

I spent a couple weekends in Tallahassee prior to being dispatched to Niceville, to do some FEMA sub-contract disaster inspection work relevant to Hurrican Ivan.

Extraneous to the Fighting Seminole Stadium, I fail to see the what the attaction is.

Definitely low-rent.

$300k for a one-bedroom condo? Must be the laundered cocaine money moving northward.

 
 
Comment by AL
2006-03-17 10:04:00

As I’m a renter in Miami I was curious if we have any home owners that have seen their Wind policies increase and what is the added cost? I know that FPL has increased the rates for power
—AL

Comment by sfbayqt
2006-03-17 10:30:38

Please educate. Is the “Wind policy” the same as the hurricane insurance?

BayQT~

Comment by sfbayqt
2006-03-17 10:40:00

I ask the question because I live in Norther Ca but own a townhouse (6 yrs) in Newport News, VA. The community is not in a flood zone, but I do have hurricane insurance. In 2003 (hurricane Isabel) I read through my hurricane insurance once again to calm my nerves, but realized that it didn’t cover water damage. Thus, I quickly purchased flood insurance (Only $260/yr because I am not in a flood zone)…which, of course, had a 30 day waiting period before it went into affect. After Isabel rolled through and I was able to speak to my property manager, I found out that there was flooding all over the place…not my townhouse, though (whew!)….but a neighbor had a tree fall on it’s roof. A friend in another part of town stayed in her house and sustained cuts from windows being broken out and other injuries. I was lucky that season. It was the first time that I felt so incredibly vulnerable with regards to hurricanes and the locale of my property.

If Wind coverage is yet another type of insurance, I’d like to look into that, as well.

BayQT~

 
Comment by AL
2006-03-17 10:47:17

correct…

Comment by sfbayqt
2006-03-17 11:26:59

*Correct*, that it is the same or another type of insurance coverage?

I wonder if Wind coverage is specific to certain states/areas, though? This is what I found after I posted the question above:

Wind deductible - a separate deductible applicable to loss caused by wind.

Hurricane deductible - a separate deductible applicable to loss caused by wind due to a defined hurrican or tropical windstorm.

High Windstorm Deductible - a separate deductible applicable to loss caused by wind in excess of a defined wind speed, but not limited to a “hurricane” windstorm.

SOOO many options…and things to miss when you think you are all “covered”. :-(

BayQT~

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by va_investor
2006-03-17 12:39:44

I have 3 policies in Florida: Homeowners, Wind, and Flood. Each is a separate policy and a separate premium. Confusing and hard to keep track of.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Jim M
2006-03-17 11:42:54

After I left FL this FL, my policy didn’t get cancelled because my insurance agent’s office got totalled, I got a notice forwarded to me telling me my insurance rates were going up about $1000 a year. Add that to the $1200 increase from the year before when I had to scramble to find a new company after the one I had pulled out of FL after Frances, Jeanne etc.

My taxes and insurance would have been more than my mortgage payment.

 
 
Comment by John Law
Comment by sfbayqt
2006-03-17 10:51:23

One would think that this kind of information would matter to those building and buying. In fact, since Katrina destroyed NO, there have been many, many articles about the upswing in the number and strength of hurricanes in North America in the coming years. I don’t understand why builders don’t take this information into consideration….or do they care?

BayQT~

 
Comment by AL
2006-03-17 10:53:55

Great,,,, my lease on this house in North Miami is up in June, I was thinking I’d move into on of those new condo buildings, lots of investors trying to rent out, now i’m sure going to get out of this house after living through the 2 hurricanes last year and not having power for 2 weeks…

 
 
Comment by BigDaddy63
2006-03-17 11:09:30

Ah.. for the good old days……….

Wind insurance hikes slap coastal residents
A law requires the state’s homeowner insurer of last resort to charge top dollar.
By David Sedore

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Friday, October 15, 2004

Coastal homeowners are getting socked again, and it has nothing to do with Charley, Frances, Ivan or Jeanne.

Homeowners who buy hurricane insurance on their homes through Citizens Property Insurance Corp., the state’s insurer of last resort, are finding their premiums suddenly rising by as much as 50 percent, or higher. The premium spike is the result of the state law that created the state-sponsored insurance pool in 2002 and held down rates until this year.

Latest news

• Why Screens Failed
• Post stories, special reports
RSS news feeds
• News on PDAs, cellphones

Season recap
• Review all the storms
Audio slide show
Photos, video, audio clips

More resources
• Read, post on blog
• Message board | Polls
• Free e-mail updates
• Satellites and radar
• About storms, forecasting
• Site map and A-Z guide

Preparation guide

• Before the storm | During
• After | Tips at a glance
• S. Fla. emergency resources

More news
• State/Legislature
• Political coverage
• National | World
• Latest AP news
• Honor fallen soldiers
• Florida Lotto numbers
• Special reports

That law limited any premium hikes Citizens could impose during 2002 and 2003, but also mandated that on July 1, 2004, Citizens reset windstorm rates covering hurricane damage higher than those of private insurers.

“Basically, rates had been artificially suppressed by the legislature,” said Bob Lotane, a spokesman for the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation. “As of July 1, Citizens had to take everyone up.”

Astonished policyholders feeling the financial pain have complained to state regulators, only to hear it’s the law.

“It’s astounding,” said John Farr, a Palm Beach County insurance agent who sells Citizens’ policies. “How do you justify it?”

To make matters worse, there’s the distinct possibility that Citizens will have to raise rates again — for all its customers — depending on what private insurers do in the wake of the four hurricanes that hit Florida in August and September. One company, American Strategic Insurance Corp., has asked the state for a rate hike as a result of homeowner damage claims after the storms.

The recent premium hike for Citizens’ customers varies depending on a variety of factors, including where they live. It affects only customers who live in the territory formerly covered by the old Florida Windstorm Underwriters Association, what Citizens calls “high-risk” policies.

In Palm Beach County, that includes areas east of Interstate 95 south of PGA Boulevard, and east of Alternate A1A north of PGA.

It also includes a narrow slice of coastal St. Lucie County that contains about 2,400 customers, but none in Martin County.

Under state law, Citizens must charge insurance rates that are above the market rates of private insurers so that there is an incentive for homeowners to buy insurance from private carriers, if possible.

Susanne Murphy, corporate counsel for Citizens, said the story behind the big rate adjustment goes back to 1999, when Florida Windstorm raised rates by as much as 190 percent in parts of Palm Beach County. That hike was to be phased in over a period of years, beginning in 2000. But two years later, before the full weight of that increase hit policyholders, the legislature combined Florida Windstorm with another state-sponsored insurance pool to create Citizens.

Then the legislature said Citizens could hike rates for customers in the windstorm territory by a maximum of 10 percent in 2002 and 20 percent in 2003. In the meantime, Citizens had to develop a method for setting rates above what private insurers charge and implement it by July 1, 2004. Citizens adopted a rate system based on the highest hurricane rate charged among the state’s top 20 private carriers.

“We’re not supposed to have attractive rates,” Murphy said. “This is probably the first time that people are seeing what the true rates for their coverage should be.”

Other factors are affecting what policyholders are paying, including a home’s location, changes in property values and whether they qualify for any discounts, such as hurricane shutters or home construction type. Those discounts also have changed with the law in ways that could benefit some policyholders while hurting others.

On top of that, Citizens hiked rates last winter by a statewide average of 11.9 percent as of July 1. That hike increased the average Palm Beach County windstorm premium by $120 a year, to $1,765 from $1,645. Most customers in the county weren’t affected, although a small group were hit with a 24.9 percent rate increase.

By contrast, in 1999 when Florida Windstorm announced the 190 percent rate hike, the average Palm Beach County premium was $541 a year.

Farr, the Palm Beach County agent, said the new rate hike might go unnoticed by many, who pay their premiums through their mortgage company.

But it didn’t slip past Suzanne Maurno of North Palm Beach, who received her renewal notice this summer. Her annual bill went from about $6,900 to more than $10,000, though credits for impact-resistant windows should reduce the premium to about $9,300.

She said she was disgusted when she saw the bill.

“We even considered self-insuring till we put pen to paper,” Maurno said. “My concern is if my rate goes up again, where does it stop

 
Comment by need 2 leave ca
2006-03-17 11:41:05

LAST ONE OUT OF FLORIDA, TURN OUT THE LIGHTS

Comment by myamuh native
2006-03-17 20:50:29

no need to turn them out-the hurricanes will do it for you!!

 
 
Comment by Ron C
2006-03-17 13:31:10

OK, I see a lot of under-informed of speculating on the coming insurance disaster in FL. In reality, there are three reasons why some policy premiums are skyrocketing:

1) You live on a barrier island or within a mile or two of the coast;
2) You have ceramic roof-tiles, easily damaged and expensive to replace.
3) You have an older home that is not concrete block and stucco and/or was built before Andrew’s wake-up call.

Probably 90% of the homes built in the last five years do not fall into one of these categories. I live in Port St. Lucie in a CBS house and pay $950 per year to insure $180k worth of home. Most people pay something similar. Flooding is extremely rare.

Yes, the insurer of last resort is underfunded. Do you think it might be because they are insuring million dollar homes on the taxpayer’s dime? Subsidizing because you’re poor, I’m OK with. Subsidizing because no insurance company in their right mind will write the policy I am not. And no, I don’t want to subsidize the insurance on your vacation home on a barrier island, so get off this “non-resident discrimination” trip. If you can’t afford to fix/replace the property, don’t buy the property.

 
Comment by realestateblues
2006-03-17 16:08:55

Why should I have to pay? I am entitled to the house on the beach!
:-)

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post