July 4, 2007

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For July 4, 2007

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

209 Comments »

Comment by palmetto
2007-07-04 04:22:11

Happy 4th of July, everyone! Just wanted to take a moment to express my thanks and appreciation for Ben, the blog and my fellow bloggers.

Comment by palmetto
2007-07-04 05:18:56

” Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

A little excerpt from the Declation of Independence. Food for thought on this day of days.

Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-07-04 07:16:14

Thanks for that one. In no other nation has such a profound statement been made part of the “unofficial” culture.

 
Comment by auger-inn
2007-07-04 07:24:07

Now, if we can just get the gang in DC to read and understand this statement.

Comment by lost in utah
2007-07-04 08:09:15

“Gang” is the right term, for sure. Happy 4th, all.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-07-04 08:25:46

“For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead.”

Thomas Jefferson

 
Comment by auger-inn
2007-07-04 09:29:38

Here is a little “tin foil” to go along with the holiday fun!
http://www.independencejournal.com/

 
Comment by josemanolo7
2007-07-04 11:25:46

more like mentality of pirates rather than gangs or mobs

 
 
Comment by Waiting for the Fall
2007-07-04 12:28:03

‘I love my country; its my government I don’t trust… I’m a patriot, a dangerous man.’
- Edward Abbey

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by JimAtLaw
2007-07-04 08:52:04

A long train of abuses and usurpations indeed…

Happy 4th everyone, and thanks to Ben and the rest of you for the knowledge, wisdom and good humor shared here.

 
Comment by CHAZMAN
2007-07-04 09:46:40

The tree of liberty must be refreshed, from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” - Thomas Jefferson

 
 
Comment by peter m
2007-07-04 13:11:13

I also wish everyone om this blogsite, and above all Ben, a very happy 4th and a successful prosperous second half 2007, despite the dark clouds hovering over the US economy
and housing markets. I have become much more financially savey and astute as a result of Bens blog, which is as much an economics/financial blog as it is a housing bubble blog. Thank’s Ben. I have send a small contribution as i am starting to make a bit more dough on my new job dig. Thanks also to TX Chic, Get stucco, and the other astute regular contributors on this blog!

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-07-04 04:26:53

Happy July 4th! Go out and enjoy some fireworks, and try not to think of all the hedge funds that are blowing up.

BTW, I am trying to remember the definition of CDO. Is it Collapsed Debt Obligation?

Comment by GetStucco
2007-07-04 05:10:54

Subprime hedge fund investers = bagholders
——————————————————————–
Bear Stearns Left With Subprime Property as US Home Values Tumble
Posted by Bill Bonner on Jul 4th, 2007

Tomorrow, America’s great middle class will celebrate in a great middle class way - with picnics, crab feasts, and outdoor barbeques.

The conversation is likely to turn to housing. But unlike the sunny July 4th holiday discussions of recent yesteryears, tomorrow’s beery dialogues may be a bit overcast.

The United States is suffering the worst slump in the housing market since the ’30s, say the news accounts. How bad is it, really? That’s hard to say. The national statistics show a modest decline in prices - or even an increase, in some areas - with mounting inventories of unsold houses. In Las Vegas, the number of resold houses in May this year dropped by 28% from last year.

The wheels of Financial Fate may grind slowly…but they grind exceedingly fine. And America’s middle class is beginning to notice.

“Home values and the US$6 trillion US mortgage-backed securities market are locked in a downward spiral,” reports Bloomberg.

Bloomberg describes where the abstract - such as CDO pricing - hits the concrete - such as the cracked stone driveway.

“Bear Stearns is bailing out one money-losing hedge fund it controls and leaving another to liquidation by creditors. Both funds invested in securities backed by subprime loans. The loans, for borrowers with bad or limited credit histories, are secured by houses such as the one on Lilac Lane [in Decatur, Georgia].

“Bear Stearns took possession of the three-bedroom Lilac Lane house for US$76,500 on March 6, according to the foreclosure deed. The owner who defaulted had purchased the house in April 2005 for US$160,000 using a subprime loan that required no money down. He had been renting it out, according to the neighbor.”

http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/bear-stearns-2/2007/07/04/

Comment by GetStucco
2007-07-04 05:14:34

So subprime lending kingpin Merrill Lynch is among the proud owners of vacant homes around San Diego? LMFAO!

“JPMorgan, the third-largest US bank, and its subsidiary Chase Home Lending acquired at least 194 homes this year through foreclosure in Wayne County, Michigan. Merrill, the third-biggest securities firm by market value, and its mortgage unit, First Franklin, took possession of at least 87 homes this year in San Diego County, California. Citigroup and affiliates are the new owners of at least 47 homes in Clark County, Nevada.

“‘Our expertise is in lending money to people to buy homes, it’s not in owning homes,’ said Chase Home Lending spokesman Thomas Kelly.”

Comment by Jingle
2007-07-04 06:03:43

“..expertise..????” What expertise? You must mean your expertise in lending $600,000 on a $400,000 real estate purchase…..to a cocktail waitress making $23,000/year…..who lives 600 miles away….and rents an apartment for $475/month.

You are right. You have an expertise at a level very few people ever admit: 100% stupidity.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mgnyc
2007-07-04 06:21:21

very funny 23k cocktail waitress with a large portfolio

happy 4th to all

 
 
Comment by fla - pa
2007-07-04 11:46:10

“‘Our expertise is in lending money to people to buy homes, it’s not in owning homes,’ said Chase Home Lending spokesman Thomas Kelly.”

Tom, I think you meant to say ” Our expertise is getting people to sign up for a loan and then sell the loan ASAP”

Lending people to buy homes seems to me you should have some Expertise in making sure the home loan borrower has the ability to the money back. Oh wait I forgot it’s Not YOUR MONEY! how silly of me.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by arizonadude
2007-07-04 05:54:33

Happy 4th! Now go out and prop this phony economy up by consumeing something.Chevy and ford needs your business badly because they are in big trouble.No home equity to buy them chevys anymore.

Comment by cami
2007-07-04 06:54:50

Does this mean I should contribute my share of the $2.5 billion that will be spent on food and festivities for our little one-day celebration?

http://www.forbes.com/home/business/2007/07/02/independence-retail-consumers-biz-cx_lr_0702numbers.html

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2007-07-04 09:40:51

Yes, for pete’s sake J6P- don’t stop shopping whatever you do. Our future depends on it! Now git ‘er done and buy that crew cab on 72 mo. loan - you’re a modern day minuteman - armed with a credit card!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Neil
2007-07-04 21:04:23

ROTFL

That’s one of the funniest things I’ve ever read!

Got popcorn?
Neil

 
 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-07-04 05:16:29

Bear Stearns Tremor Warns of Earthquake in Financial Markets

Posted by Dan Denning on Jun 29th, 2007
Investors are suddenly wary of debt-backed assets. This begins with a deep suspicion of the most suspicious assets like mortgage-backed bonds, or the CDOs that are carried on balance sheets at values somewhat removed from market reality. But here’s the trouble when the market loses confidence - it puts an end to the bull markets in nearly all riskier assets.

http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/bear-stearns-earthquake/2007/06/29/

 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-07-04 05:20:40

Merrill Lynch, the Michael Jackson of Wall Street
Posted by Dan Denning on Jun 22nd, 2007

You can call Merrill Lynch (NYSE:MER) the Michael Jackson of Wall Street. Remember a few years ago when Jacko delighted and shocked the media by dangling his baby outside a hotel room? What kind of moron does something like that?

On Thursday, Merrill Lynch quit dangling the mortgage market baby out the window and hugged the subprime mess tight against its chest. Specifically, Merrill did not auction off around US$850 million in mortgage-backed bonds it seized as collateral from two struggling Bear Stearns (NYSE:BSC) hedge funds. By stepping away from the cliff and backing slowly away, Merrill has averted-for now-a mortgage-backed meltdown where the market reprices hundreds of millions in securities stuffed with over-valued subprime loans.

http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/merrill-lynch/2007/06/22/

Comment by Sally O'Maley
2007-07-04 16:10:30

Didn’t I read somewhere that the reason Merrill didn’t sell was because they couldn’t find a buyer?

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-07-04 05:29:02

Private equity industry faces ‘tough times’
(Read our blog of the committee hearing)
Phillip Inman
Tuesday July 3, 2007
Guardian Unlimited

Private equity firms will struggle to make spectacular gains from selling companies back to the stock market, a senior industry figure warned today, signalling an end to the exuberance that has characterised private equity deals in recent years.

Jon Moulton, head of private equity firm Alchemy Partners, said the failure to secure a high price for fashion retailer New Look was a “straw in the wind” and revealed tougher times ahead for the industry.

He likened the industry to the struggling US sub-prime mortgage market which he said showed what could happen when banks refused to underwrite asset sales with unsustainably high prices.

http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,2117658,00.html

Comment by txchick57
2007-07-04 05:39:43

Why do you suppose they’re rushing to file for IPOs now. KKR is the latest one. And of course the quid pro quo for all the money they’ve paid IBs and brokers over the years is they have to buy into these losers. Noice!

Comment by not a gator
2007-07-04 11:53:26

The question is why they didn’t rush to IPO in January.

Apparently the big boys aren’t as smart as they look.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-07-04 05:34:41

Cioffi’s Hero-to-Villain Hedge Funds Masked Bear Peril in CDOs

By Yalman Onaran and Jody Shenn

Prices Nosedive

There’s a lot more at stake than the career of another careening star on Wall Street or the Bear Stearns share price, which is down 12 percent this year and underperforming its peers in the securities industry and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.

Bear Stearns is among the Wall Street firms that benefited from burgeoning sales of CDOs — which repackage bonds, loans and other assets into new securities. CDO sales reached $503 billion last year, a fivefold increase in three years.

Prices of CDOs backed by subprime mortgage bonds nosedived as defaults by the least creditworthy borrowers surged in 2007. Bankers call the bottom sections of a CDO, the ones most vulnerable to losses from bad debt, the equity tranches. They also refer to them as toxic waste because as more borrowers default on loans, these investments would be the first to take losses, according to an exclusive 2,360-word report published June 1 by Bloomberg News.

The fallout from errant trading of CDOs is a growing concern for hedge funds, or private pools of capital that allow managers to participate substantially in the gains of the money invested, like Cioffi’s, as well as for pension funds, such as the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, that have invested in CDOs, seeking higher returns. Although Cioffi had mainly invested in the top tranches of the CDOs, his funds weren’t spared from the market’s tailspin.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=azWrpTVCph08&refer=us

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2007-07-04 04:27:45

Wow, I’ve got the news on in the background and there was just a report that the dollar has fallen to a 26 year low against the pound. I guess “it” has started. I recall one of my siblings telling me that Hank Paulson was brought on as Treasury Secretary to “manage” the falling dollar.

Comment by GetStucco
2007-07-04 04:44:54

The dollar is definitely getting pounded. Maybe it is time to move away from the l-t T-bond inflation risk premium hard peg to free-floating T-bond risk premiums?
——————————————————————–
Dollar Trades Near Record Low Versus Euro as Central Banks Meet

By Aaron Pan and Stanley White

July 4 (Bloomberg) — The dollar traded near a record low against the euro and the weakest in 26 years versus the pound on speculation European interest rates will rise faster than U.S. borrowing costs.

Traders expect the Bank of England to raise rates to a six- year high of 5.75 percent and the European Central Bank to signal an increase at meetings of policy makers tomorrow. The dollar has fallen against all the Group of 10 currencies except the yen this year amid the worst U.S. housing slump since the 1930s.

“Interest-rate differentials are moving against the dollar,” said Neil Mellor, a currency strategist at Bank of New York in London.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aHW8aC.Tdq_A&refer=news

Comment by palmetto
2007-07-04 04:53:32

“The dollar has fallen against all the Group of 10 currencies except the yen this year amid the worst U.S. housing slump since the 1930s.”

So housing brings down the dollar! Or helps to, anyway.

Comment by Hoz
2007-07-04 09:32:14

No oil is bringing down the dollar! The US may have a 1.2T dollar deficit with China, but it has a 3T dollar deficit with OPEC.

As Stephen Roach said this week:
“In its rush to impose trade sanctions on China, the US congress risks making a policy blunder of monumental proportions,” Roach said.

“We don’t have a bilateral problem with China. We have a multilateral problem here. Blaming deficits on China won’t fix anything,” Roach said.

The United States registered US$836 billion in trade deficit last year. The Chinese bilateral deficit of US$232 billion represented the largest portion - 28 percent - of America’s overall multilateral trade gap but the deficits with other partners were three times as much, he explained.

“The United States runs trade deficits not because it is victimized by unfair competition from China or anyone else but because it suffers from a chronic shortfall in domestic savings,” Roach said.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by jmf
2007-07-04 04:57:38

On the other hand i dont´t like the pound either.

I´m considering a pound short vs the euro after the BOE rate hike tomorrow. The housing bubble in the uk is 12-18 month behind the us and about to pop sooner than later.

Comment by palmetto
2007-07-04 04:58:50

Ah, so housing will also bring down the pound. Interesting.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Geoff
2007-07-04 07:05:16

“Rate increases have a more direct immediate effect on Spanish families because 96 percent of mortgages in Spain are variable rate, compared with about 20 percent in the U.K. and 12 percent in the U.S.”
So you think ECB can keep hiking? Look at the trouble we got into with just 12% of loans being adjustable. They’e got all the usual suspects like 50yr mtg. and 100% financing. Housing accounts for 10% of GDP in Spain compared to US 5%. This massive overbuilding has been the growth engine for EU.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=ar3L878k5YM4&refer=exclusive
The article is a month old, but I would guess it’s only gotten worse. Sounds like Broward County, except it’s the whole country.
Medium term, I like USD.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Siggi
2007-07-04 07:45:14

Yes, the ECB will raise rates. They kept them low because of the stagnation / recession in Germany. Now that salaries rise again,…

Have a look at the ECB statutes, the task of the ECB is to maintain price stability.

It is well known that Spain is toast. They had negative real rates for years. How stupid can you be to believe that is going to last?

The Spanish goverment was warned by the ECB, the OECD and the EU commission several times. It’s going to be really tough for them. It’s not just their housing bubble, it is also their account deficit of 9%. Unlike the US, they can no longer debase their currency…

Spain will now learn what happens when you don’t spend all the cheap money in productivity gains.

 
Comment by nhz
2007-07-04 08:01:59

siggi: the ECB does not give a damn about price stability. Money supply has been surging in Europe from the moment the ECB got control, just like in the US. The difference between M3 and official rates is even bigger (more negative) in Europe than in the US.

And yes, salaries are rising in some EU countries but the rise does not keep up with inflation. There was an analysis in the Dutch papers today about the goldilocks economy that our government is boasting about to its citizens: the reality is that despite 2-3% wage increases this year, for 95% of the citizens disposable wage is declining (again, like it was for the last 10 years or so).

 
Comment by jmf
2007-07-04 08:05:39

Spain will also be in big big trouble! Ireland also.

But Spain accounts for only 8% of overall economic activity in the Eurozone. Germany has lagged for a decade and is now leading.

Germany stands for almost 20% of Eurozone gdp. And with the downtrend in Spain and the uptrend in Germany it will soon be 3 times the size.

Here is a nice list (2 page pdf)
http://tinyurl.com/2kbdk8

 
Comment by Siggi
2007-07-04 08:14:49

This all looks very different from a German perspective. The rates were just fine for Germany, but too low for the Netherlands and Spain. Remember that in February 2005, unemployment was at 5 Millions in Germany officially. And, there was no inflation. Food and RE was extremely cheap, only energy costs were rising. The saving rate was at 10%.

Wages will increase by 4% this year. Unemployment is now at 3,8 Millions. That’s why the ECB has raised rates already. For some reason, probably the size of the German economy, the ECB has the right policy for Germany, while Spain and the Netherlands need a different policy for sure.

The disparities in the eurozone are not unexpected. Consequences?

All I can say is that 1923 is still very present in this country. Any indicators of inflation can cause pretty severe reactions.

 
Comment by nhz
2007-07-04 08:23:06

yes, there are a few German bankers who still remember the Weimar era. But the ECB is ruled by burocrats, and I’m sure they will be voted out of existence by the dumbocrats in the EU parliament when they try to raise rates high enough to slow the housing/credit bubble.

Maybe the ECB rates were OK for Germany for some time, but they were definitely wrong for ALL the other EU countries, and they know it. Inflation is contained in the heavily manipulated ECB (Eurostat) statistics, but not in the real world.

 
Comment by jmf
2007-07-04 08:37:39

I agree nhz.

The influence from hawks like Issing declined dramatically in the past years. They have an official money supply target of 4-5% (it is running now over 10%). Since 2002 the money supply was only 2 quarters in that range!!!!!!!!!!!!

They are really not so tough on inflation as they want us make believe…..

 
Comment by Siggi
2007-07-04 08:38:39

I agree that the ECB has known all the time what they were doing. But they are not just burocrats. Issing at least was a very experienced banker. The ECB is designed according to the former Bundesbank, and the German government will not accept any changes, Mr. Sarkozy can be very sure about that.

The EU parliament will just approve the candidates nominated by the Council. And as long as Mr. Lafontaine is not the chancelor of Germany, they will not nominate pro inflation types.

 
Comment by nhz
2007-07-04 10:07:55

‘they will not nominate pro inflation types’

real rates in the EU have been around 7% NEGATIVE right from the start from the ECB. The current ECB is fighting inflation with empty words only, their actual policy is all about increasing (asset) inflation to benefit big business and the rich. I don’t believe for a moment that the ECB is independent; last year there were already some riots in ECB parliament about raising rates, any real tightening (tightening that is enough to scare the surging markets) will bring out the dumbocrats in full force and change the rules. Don’t underestimate the powers of inflation heads like Sarkozy, Brown and many other high ranking EU officials. There are a few German bankers that fight the raising inflation tide, but history proves that their influence on ECB policy is marginal at best.

 
Comment by Siggi
2007-07-04 11:00:17

If you are right, nhz, and I start thinking you are, because there is quite some evidence, and I just read an interesting interview with Ottmar Issing, I think the EUR is doomed to fail. There is always a point when asset inflation spills over into the commodity markets, and they can only fool people so long.

The disparities in the eurozone are getting worse every day, we only need to look at the different policies in the housing markets in the Netherlands and Germany, not to mention the Southern countries.

 
Comment by Geoff
2007-07-04 12:33:18

“Siggi wrote: It is well known that Spain is toast. They had negative real rates for years. How stupid can you be to believe that is going to last?”

Gee, thanks. I’m blushing. You seem to suggest that because a bubble is widely acknowledged, then it’s effects are over. Housing has just started to flatten in Spain. They seem to be running behind the US, and we’ve just gotten started.

So German manufacturing can handle 4.75%, but that means 96% of mortgage payments in Spain go up another 18%. How about the quarter million Brits with property in Spain? I guess Florida has gotten them used to dropping values? How about Eastern Europeans with Euro mortgages?
None of that matters because Germany is still going strong?
Keep on truckin”, I do love my Miele vacuum and my boys love anything Playmobil.

 
Comment by Siggi
2007-07-04 13:50:11

I am just watching what’s going on. And the ECB started to raise rates when Germany’s long stagnation ended. Coincidence?
We have those disparities in the Euro zone, and Germany has regained some economic strength through stagnant salaries for ten years, while the salaries in the other euro countries increased about 25%. That’s one of the consequences of the single European currency: You can no longer debase your currency in order to improve your competitiveness. It’s all about productivity now. Germany has had one of the most stable currencies after 1949. The countries in the south, in contrast, were used to debase every now and then. That’s over.

During the time of easy money, in Spain only one sector boomed: RE. We had a housing boom in the East, just after the reunification. After that boom ended, it took more than 10 years for the builders to recover. But building has never been 10% of our GDP, except after WWII.

I expect at least one more rate hike this year. If not, we will get visible inflation in Europe, not just assets, but common goods, too. Even Eurostat cannot hide that.

What happens to the Brits, the ECB won’t care much. Their own BOE is raising rates anyway. Eastern Europeans will still be better off with Euro mortgages, because in most countries, that rates are higher anyway. And Spain? I really don’t know. Maybe they should leave the Euro, but then, the rates would probably go up even further.

The EMU is based on a couple of deals, one of them is that governments must keep their economies under control. Spain could have cooled their housing markets simply by adequate taxes or regulations or whatever. All the corruption in Spanish towns tells the same story. In some places, the entire town parliaments have been arrested. It’s all very ugly. I’d say, Spain is already doomed, and it doesn’t make sense to ruin the other countries through increased inflation for everyone.

If it gets too bad, I could even imagine Germany to leave the eurozone again.

 
Comment by nhz
2007-07-05 03:50:24

there are some more economies that could drop out of the euro very soon, like Italy and Greece; they use all kinds of statistical tricks and plain lies to suggest they work within the rules of the euro framework. Everybody knows they are not playing by the rules. And I’m sure that if voters in Netherlands had a choice they would vote to get the hell out of the euro and back to the Dutch guilder (which worked fine for about four centuries). For Spain it’s mostly a housing bubble problem, their economy is doing better than some others. If Spain drops out of the euro, it’s the beginning of the end because others will follow. I think there will be a stealth recue operation from the ECB, no doubt they can learn from Bernanke and Paulson to print some more fiat paper and keep the virtual economy humming along. Times have never been better for the upper class of Europe, so why change a thing?

 
 
Comment by nhz
2007-07-04 07:55:04

latest housing numbers for Netherlands are out today: up 2.2% from previous quarter, that is 9% annualized gain. Even realtors are now expressing some concern because while incomes have been nearly stagnant for years (and real incomes declining), despite historically low rates the real costs of owning a home are surging. But thanks to the funny money from the ECB, buyers have not blinked yet. Also, some Dutch banks (like ING, parent of ING Direct in the US) keep boasting about successfull purchases of large chunks of real estate in other countries, mostly in the US.

in Europe the housing/credit bubble is still in full swing, and in many countries consumer optimism is at or near an all time high. I don’t believe for a moment that the ECB is going to do something about it. They are exactly the same kind of crooks as those at the helm at the FED, BOE, BOJ etc.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-07-04 05:00:39

Do you see that upward sloping yield curve? That is a sign of growing future U.S. economic strength. Or else a sign that foreign CBs don’t want to buy our l-t Treasuries any longer. There is an identification problem which makes it impossible to tell which interpretation is correct, without further identifying information such as the change in factory orders.

http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates/index.html

Comment by GetStucco
2007-07-04 05:02:30

Ten-Year Bonds `Not a Happy 4th July Picture,’ Says Citigroup

By Jake Lee

July 4 (Bloomberg) — Ten-year Treasuries may decline, pushing the yield up to a five-year high of 5.33 percent, based on charts some traders use to predict future movements, wrote technical strategists at Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

“This is not a happy 4th July picture,” said New York- based Tom Fitzpatrick and London-based John Noyce in a research note dated yesterday. “We can revisit 5.33 percent again.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601009&sid=aW6cO3w7LTPY&refer=bond

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Geoff
2007-07-04 07:22:58
Comment by nhz
2007-07-04 08:10:33

seen from Euroland, Kiwi $ seems on its way to retest the all time high against the euro from end of 2005. Now that probably says more about the euro toilet paper than the Kiwi dollar, but still … The housing bubble in NZ keeps growing just like in Europe, with a record current account deficit it is heading for serious trouble somewhere in the future (when the carry trade rewinds).

In february 2007 the NZ Central Bank announced that a ’soft landing’ for the economy had been achieved. Well, I guess NOT … They probably need interest rates in excess of 10% to cool the housing party, and that could make the carry trade even more attractive. Hyperinflation, here we come.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-07-04 12:04:00

A U.S. Investor in NZ$ cd’s coulda cleaned up with a tidy 35% return, the past year… (7% interest & 28% return on exchange rates)

 
Comment by nhz
2007-07-05 03:55:29

yes, the potential gains were spectacular. Just makes one wonder what happens when it all shifts in reverse, there must be others somewhere who are going to pay dearly for this.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2007-07-04 18:55:24

Maybe it is because the UK shifted Gordon Brown away from “managing” the pound ;)

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-07-04 04:52:25

Smaller-than-expected drop in factory orders suggest economy is rebounding from non-recession
———————————————————————-

Factory orders, other reports suggest rebound for economy

By Jeannine Aversa
ASSOCIATED PRESS
July 4, 2007

WASHINGTON – America’s factories saw demand for their products dip by a smaller-than-expected 0.5 percent in May, suggesting that despite some pockets of weakness the manufacturing revival remains intact.

The drop reported by the Commerce Department yesterday came after new orders for a range of manufactured goods rose by 0.5 percent in April. The decline in May mostly reflected weaker demand for airplanes. Fewer orders for construction equipment, industrial machinery and household appliances also figured prominently into the overall decline – byproducts of the housing slump.

The 0.5 percent dip was a much better showing than the deeper 1.2 percent decline that economists said they were expecting.

“What we’ve been seeing is two steps forward, one step back. So . . . we’re moving ahead,” said economist Ken Mayland, president of ClearView Economics.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20070704/news_1b4economy.html

Comment by palmetto
2007-07-04 04:57:55

“Fewer orders for construction equipment, industrial machinery and household appliances also figured prominently into the overall decline – byproducts of the housing slump.”

OK, but there are other things we can produce here in the US. Yesterday, the news here was full of the Chinese product debacle. We could turn it around, you know. “Made in the USA” is something people used to be able to trust and if we pull it together, we can make it something to trust again.

Comment by GetStucco
2007-07-04 05:03:27

I agree. Luckily I own no pets, but if I did, I would certainly look for that Made in America label on my pet food.

Comment by palmetto
2007-07-04 05:07:36

I went shopping for vitamins yesterday and grilled the clerk at the local GNC on various products. Most said “Made in USA”. Actually, he was more than a clerk, he was part of the family that owned the store and others in the area and has been to GNC headquarters and also toured some of their growing operations in the US.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2007-07-04 05:10:40

Oh, yeah, just for grins, Chuck Schumer (D-New York) was on the news talking about how we need a “czar” to oversee imported food products. Geez, every time some agency takes a dump, we need another “czar”. Really worked out with Chertoff, not.

 
Comment by cynicalgirl
2007-07-04 05:24:39

We already have that. It’s called the FDA, the USDA, and the Department of Commerce. If those people were doing their jobs, we wouldn’t have this problem.

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-07-04 05:27:25

Testify, cynicalgirl! Problem is, these agencies appear, at this time, to be working for multinationals, not “the people”.

 
Comment by River
2007-07-04 06:03:15

Doesn’t matter if it says “Made in the USA” on it…they are buying their raw materials from China, which are even LESS controlled than finished products, smashing it together and selling it.

 
Comment by spike66
2007-07-04 06:16:22

Palmetto,
Sorry to tell you, River is right. It is no longer enough to see “made in USA” on the label, you must know the origin of the ingredients. Sad fact; almost all vitamin ingredients are now made in China, from unknown sources, in unknown conditons, from producers with zero oversight or safety concerns. Consider whether you really need vitamins…or just fresher, locally grown food.

 
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-07-04 07:32:23

We have huge budget deficits, and need to cut spending. However, the bulk of the budget is Social Security, Medicare, Military, VA, and interest on the debt, which can’t be cut.

So, we cut “the other stuff”.

My 67 y/o dad was bitching about high taxes. So I asked what to do about the deficit. His cliche Republican self says “cut spending”. He’s still living in the fantasy world that we’re running a deficit because of giant welfare payments to every black person in the country.

So, I sent him the link the the U.S. budget with a summary and the details of where the money goes. Now slice $300 billion out of the budget.

After a few days he came back with, cut taxes and stimulate the economy….

Ugh. I give up.

Why do the rich pay so much taxes???? Because no one else can afford to!

 
Comment by lost in utah
2007-07-04 08:15:51

OT: I feed my dogs human food, I buy local when possible, I make them a big pan of glop (veggies, rice, pasta, etc., whatever is handy) and they love it. Must be OK, my Dachsund just passed away at nearly 19, and I have two Blue Heeler mixes approaching 16, all healthy. Even the better kibbles are pretty bad. Me, I eat TV dinners (not really, I eat the glop, too).

 
Comment by not a gator
2007-07-04 12:06:53

This incompetent redneck named Wayne who only keeps his job because he shows up every day (it really is different in the South) was telling me that taxes are too high.

I said sure, we could cut taxes, for example payroll taxes, but there would be no more Social Security and Medicare. (What do I care? I’m 27.) [Also, stop fighting stupid wars. Anyway, he didn't argue about the military budget.] He said that Congress etc. would never stop funding for social security. He was confidant that the bennies would be there when he needed them.

I tried to make him see that the money for the bennies came from current tax receipts, but he just didn’t get it!

Sure, okay, fine! Money grows on trees! Of course, when it grows on trees, it isn’t worth very much…

How low is this guy’s IQ? Seriously? And why are these rednecks so dumb? Urban poor in Boston who grew up eating lead paint chips are smarter than this guy. Guh….

I mean, at least the KFC/Pepsi infertility conspiracy theory had INTERNAL logic going for it….

 
 
Comment by txchick57
2007-07-04 05:30:29

A good brand is Canidae. Never recalled. That’s what I feed my guys when I don’t have time to make it myself. Another good one is Honest Kitchen.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Front Range Bob
2007-07-04 06:51:21

Royal Canin is also very good.

 
Comment by txchick57
2007-07-04 07:59:16

some of their products were recalled.

 
Comment by JimAtLaw
2007-07-04 09:13:37

River and spike66 are right - Made in the USA doesn’t mean a thing if they buy, e.g., contaminated wheat gluten from China and just bake it in here in the U.S.

Even the USDA organic certification appears to allow application to imported foods. I could be mistaken, but the list of “Accredited Certifying Agents” at http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/CertifyingAgents/Accredited.html includes foreign certifiers - if I’m wrong, please do let me know, but this makes me seriously question the value of the so-called certification.

BTW, while on the USDA site I noticed this page on the food CPI, http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cpifoodandexpenditures/consumerpriceindex.htmhttp://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cpifoodandexpenditures/consumerpriceindex.htm, something else to keep an eye on.

 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2007-07-04 05:04:13

“Made in the USA” is something people used to be able to trust and if we pull it together, we can make it something to trust again.”

OK, this being the 4th of July, what would we have to do to turn it around here in the US? Better education? Elimination of Fed and hedge funds? Fostering pride in production?

BTW, as illegals pour across the border, conventional visitors from other countries are all but probed trying to just come here for a little tourism. We need those visitors.

Comment by Daniel
2007-07-04 05:40:51

How about getting rid of AIPAC and the Congressional Zionists who are running the country?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2007-07-04 05:48:24

Getting rid of all lobbyists would help a lot. Corporate and foreign interest cartels should be forbidden to set foot inside any Congressperson’s office. And members of Congress ought to be required to spend more time in their districts and less time in Washington.

 
Comment by david cee
2007-07-04 05:50:41

Thanks Daniel, for reminding me what a great country we have on Independance Day, and amoung our 250 million citizens, we still have the right to be prejudiced and stupid.

 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-07-04 07:17:22

“what would we have to do to turn it around here in the US?”

Build a better engine. The American auto industry keeps wondering why they can’t compete. Build a better f—ing engine that is more durable and efficient than anything the Japanese are making, at a reasonable cost, and all problems would be solved.

I get sick of the pundits and media acting like simple problems are complicated. Just do a better job. Is that so difficult?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-07-04 07:40:58

Japananeese companies spend $10,000 designing a car and $5000 building it. They then sell it for $20,000.

American companies spend $6,000 designing the car, $4,000 building it, and $8,000 in extra pensions and health benifits to older and retired workers. Then try to sell the car for $20,000, but have to give $2K cash back to get it off the lot.

Just like the older airlines that can’t compete with the young boys, until they go bankrupt and dump their retiree benifits, then come back from bankruptcy with better service and high profits.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-07-04 07:52:32

Amen! NY City Boy….a little pride in the product! Oh, and taking care of the customer would be nice too….

Some posters talk about dumb workers (J6Pk) but in my former industry I was constantly told to dumb it down and get the product out the door. That was in the 90s. I tried to think quality as I had worked for some pretty high end clients (so dumb me thought this would make people happy) but it actually showed up in my reviews that I was too concerned about it.

Fast forward 15 years and I don’t even think they train frontline people the same way I was. I’m sure many aren’t even trained to be nice never mind trained to analyze and solve the problem. Personally I’ve got a long list of companies to avoid due to this problem—such as Sears, Home Depot, Culligan, American car makers, etc. If Americans are avoiding your product why would foreigners want to buy?

 
Comment by saywhat?
2007-07-04 08:31:04

“I’m sure many aren’t even trained to be nice never mind trained to analyze and solve the problem.”

As an educator, that is exactly what we are trying to do. At least most of us are. My kids aren’t spending weeks building a model of Independence Hall or whatever (and I remember that stuff happening when I was a student back in the day).

The word out there is to get these students to think, really think. The challenge is to let them know that they do indeed have skin in the game, so make the effort.

We need support from their parents…..and society in general - the “entitlement” trip is driving me nuts.

BTW, Palmetto, when we study the Declaration of Independence, I’m real big on conveying the “duty” we have to throw off an oppressive government. Like….know what’s going on, get involved (which means you’re actually going to have to do some unremimbursed WORK - or, at least donate) - and vote (I know, I know).

The old hippy in me would enjoy a rad paintball match though.

 
Comment by not a gator
2007-07-04 12:22:04

So … Darrell … you’re telling me the Japanese don’t have to pay pensions and/or import duties?

So … Toyota got a better deal from UAW when they took over the Fresno plant from GM? I never heard any such thing.

According to some books on business I have read, Toyota kicks GM’s ass every day because they are better at manufacturing cars. They sit the engineers, foremen, and linemen at the same table and they improve their manufacturing process every week. They also designed their factories to be more efficient. (Terms such as “push” and “pull” manufacturing come from Toyota manufacturing concepts.)

GM has really good engineers in R&D, but the company is run by a bunch of suits who have, since the 1920’s, seen their business as a financing business, not a manufacturing business. GM is a bank, not a car manufacturer. This is why their cars suck. Comes straight from the top.

Companies like Honda, which see better engineering as their focus, are always going to eat the lunch of entities like GM, which ignore their engineers and see lobbying Congress as their focus.

Incidently, Honda makes nicer engines than Toyota, IMO, but Toyota is more profitable because of their superior manufacturing systems. Toyotas are slightly, but significantly, more reliable than Hondas, despite Honda’s high-tech philosophy. Toyotas are also cheaper. This is why Toyota was able to take the hybrid market while Honda floundered. Toyota is able to realize economies of scale with much smaller production runs.

Today’s Toyota is a multinational which employs many Americans … many of whom have pensions. Also, I don’t think GM’s international plants really pay that much worse than in the states. It’s just that GM overseas has to compete, has to build a better car, whereas domestic GM just lobbies the right people in Congress.

GM was super-profitable when Congress was doling out tax breaks for Hummers.

GM management wants you to believe that it’s the union … but Toyota USA has the same union (UAW) and they are kicking GM’s (not to mention Ford’s and Chrysler’s) butts. Hell, GM has plants in Mexico and Canada.

It isn’t the union. It’s management.

 
Comment by lost in utah
2007-07-04 13:34:37

Toyota builds and markets to intelligent people who value reliability and good engineering. GM and Ford build and market to redneck sensibilities (is that an anachonism or what?).

Just bought my 3rd Toyota, still have the second - 207,000 miles on it and runs perfect, have only had to replace the clutch - still has the original brake pads!

 
Comment by josemanolo7
2007-07-04 20:20:40

the last time i read, gm cost about $800 more to produce a car than toyota due to benefits to unions. gm could easily tuck that in the car cost and will still be within the range of a comparable toyota. nevertheless, one major car breakdown within 5 years and after warranty period will cost you more than $800. i bought a toyota even if cost higher than a comparable gm precisely because of reliability.

 
Comment by Junk
2007-07-05 00:44:25

Read ‘Jump Start: Japan Comes to the Heartland’ by David Gelsanliter for the inside scoop on Honda and Toyota building plants in the US, their location, and the UAW.

http://worldcat.org/oclc/21302097

 
Comment by CA renter
2007-07-05 03:53:11

I’ve heard that the pension/healthcare benfits to union employees runs around $1,500 per car. I’ll **gladly** pay that in order to maintain a “middle class” in the USA.

Problem is I don’t want to buy unreliable junk, and the U.S. automakers have earned a poor reputation WRT quality. We own a Honda. Could have bought a similar U.S. car for less, but wanted the safety & reliability of Honda.

It’s NOT the unions. People need to stop being brainwashed & realize what would happen if we eliminated the middle class (sure to happen without unions).

We need to actively seek out the REAL problems, not what we are *told to believe* are the problems.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-07-04 07:20:24

“Made in the USA”
When people mention that phrase, it conjures smoke-belching factories. Why do some people think we ought to have a manufacturing economy still instead of an information economy? Information is where the future belongs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by GetStucco
2007-07-04 07:46:14

“Information is where the future belongs.”

Can you drive, eat or export information? My guess is NO on all three. (Yes, I know that information can be exported, but only if you can compete on price, which the U.S. generally cannot.)

 
Comment by Gwynster
2007-07-04 07:58:07

I’d say we need a combination of manufacturing and information. Information services are too easy to export to India as we have found out.

That said, I also very much agree NY that we need some significant sucesses in development. I know we can develop and build a better engine. We just need to light a fire under the right people’s butt to get it done.

 
Comment by jerry from richardson
2007-07-04 08:07:24

It’s healthier to have a diverse economy instead of 250 million people shuffling papers and working on spreadsheets. We have to buy products from other countries. They don’t have to buy our information. They can easily steal technology. Thus the trade deficit.

 
Comment by BJ
2007-07-04 08:59:11

Make it and sell it in in the USA is not just a patriotic idea is should be a National Security idea.
If China ever decided to take the USA down all the need to do is slap sanctions on us and refuse to sell us anything. We would be on our knees with in a few months.
People say that won’t happen because China needs our consumers to keep their people working. That may be true “now” but wait a few years when their standard of living increases more and they can absorb what they make. Or when the Amercian consumer is too far in debt to buy most of their stuff.
Then Kaboom!
20 % of all of the people on earth are Chinese

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-07-04 10:16:27

In 1966 I was reading Mao’s little red book and the English translated version brought some amusement. “A man on fours is Chinese”. I pictured a bunch of people crawling around on all fours. A few seconds later I realized it should have said, ‘one man out of four is Chinese’. I have been pretty careful translating since then, but I do love the lyrics to the Chinese National Anthem

“Arise, those who do not want to be slaves!
We will use our flesh and blood to build another Great Wall. China has reached the brink of national collapse.
All the people have been making their last outcry.
Arise! Arise! Arise!
All our hearts become one.
Let us face the enemy’s gunfire.
March on! Let us face the enemy’s gunfire.
March on! March on! March on! On!”

and on this glorious 4th La Marseillaise:

“Let us go, children of the fatherland
Our day of Glory has arrived.
Against us stands tyranny,
The bloody flag is raised,
The bloody flag is raised.
Do you hear in the countryside
The roar of these savage soldiers
They come right into our arms
To cut the throats of your sons,
your country.

To arms, citizens!
Form up your battalions
Let us march, Let us march!
That their impure blood
Should water our fields”

 
Comment by bill in Phoenix
2007-07-04 20:14:42

Why should we really care about the decline of American productivity - more shoddy products that the rest of the world won’t buy? My answer? If you cannot beat them, join them. Ever think of investinng internationally? What a concept! Now you can own the companies overseas where they pay lower hourly rates and produce more - you can profit on their higher competitiveness! Imagine!

I knew that all along. It just seems like a lot of you are spring chickens since you worry about America’s economic leadership. Doesn’t matter to me. I am a world citizen and invest in the world.

 
Comment by CA renter
2007-07-05 03:59:21

If everybody “invests” for a living, instead of working, what would the outcome be?

Gotta think long-term.

No offense, Bill, but I think those of us who have kids think a bit differently that those who don’t. We tend to think longer-term and from a more selfless perspective.

We actually want to see a healthy **society** (the masses) rather than creating opportunities for the very few to enrich themselves by sucking the benefits from other people’s labor.

 
 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-07-04 08:57:04

“We could turn it around..”

After many decades of deliberately pounding American manufacturing into submission with regulatory hogties in an environmental quagmire.. with class action lawsuits up the yingyang distroying entire industries and thousands of trial lawyers foaming at the mouth for more, with powerful unions who have no mercy and complicit politicians who feed off the resultant class warfare, there’s no way in hell we could turn it around, whoever “we” is.
Can’t blame “globalization” for this one.. we did it to ourselves.

wanna manufacture something and make money? You buy raw materials where they are least expensive. You build a plant where money goes into R&D instead of to the EPA. And you’d do it in the “slave” countries where labor costs are lowest.

Comment by not a gator
2007-07-04 12:25:37

Get real. The US government incentivized outsourcing in the 1990’s. It was state policy, enacted through cushy tax breaks and trade deals.

Environmental policy hurt some industries, but mostly you will see that most places didn’t clean up until the factory shut down and the jobs were sent to China. Until then, the stench was the stench of money.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by River
2007-07-04 13:44:40

Don’t forget to add Walmart to the mix…great PBS documentary on that….Sam Walton would be turning over in his grave right now if he could see what they did…especially on the 4th of July

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-07-04 13:47:22

the 90’s? a tax break??

hey.. go back to the late 50’s .. USSteel strike lasted 4 frickin months. 90% cut in production.

What happened? Steel imports, that’s what.. and the decline of the United States steel industry had begun.

result.. industry jobs kaput.. and cheap imported steel.

 
 
 
Comment by Former FB
2007-07-04 13:33:18

“We could turn it around, you know.”

I know this won’t be popular since we have a lot of stock trader types here, but the fact is that the American worker does what the boss tells them to. Despite the occasional shenanigans to fool the stockholders, the real boss is almost always the stockholder/trader who wants to make a quick buck and get out, or else upper management who’s trying to make an even quicker buck and get out first.

If you *really* want to make American business strong for the long haul (and still allow publicly held companies), you need to somehow kill speculation in the stock market and reward real investment. I know, I know, that’s just un-American :-). If corporate stock had about the same liquidity as a share in the family business, and the real gains were from using your shareholder votes to actually encourage long-term growth, the world would be a different place.

Comment by CA renter
2007-07-05 04:03:35

Another thought is to make everyone **buy** their shares at full market price instead of receiving options & stocks as incentives (whatever that means).

More of their own skin in the game that way & less likely to think like a gambler & more like an investor.

Of course, the SEC needs to really get on these executives who are obviously trading on insider info. (and I’m not talking Marth Stewart).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by david cee
2007-07-04 05:44:26

““What we’ve been seeing is two steps forward, one step back. So . . . we’re moving ahead,” said economist Ken Mayland, president of ClearView Economics.”

Is it just me, or when I see any economic numbes coming from the government, I have a high degree of skeptism. It’s good when they want it to be, and then they readjust the number somewhere down the road. Hell, if lying to a grand jury is pardonable, what’s a little fudging on economic numbers??

Comment by spike66
2007-07-04 06:11:28

It’s not just you. Numerous posters here have made the point that almost any number released by the government has been “massaged” for political purposes. You have to take government figures and then try to extrapolate, using any available outside data, would an honest number would be. It’s th only way you can make reasonable financial decisions. The variety of backgrounds from various posters here helps, as a number of different reality checks are provided.
It is sad to note on the 4th of July that the government’s purpose is to falsify data and mislead the citizenry.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-07-04 06:21:21

Rhodesia was one of the wealthier countries in Africa, as recently as 40 years ago and has turned into hyperinflation hell…

They still like to shop, though.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6268784.stm

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Paul in Jax
2007-07-04 09:08:39

“Has turned into”? Ever heard of a fellow named Mugabe?

That would be kind of like saying Germany “turned into” a fascist, megalomaniacal war-state in the late 1930s and early 1940s, without ever mentioning Hitler.

 
Comment by BubbleWatcher
2007-07-04 09:09:53

> They still like to shop, though.

That’s totally understandable. When I lived in Russia in 90s, we had a hyperinflation there. We went from prices of 5 rubles to 5,000 rubles in two years. Nobody wanted to hold cash - whenever people got money, they would rush to the stores to dump it, because it be worth less tomorrow, literally. Prices in stores would get marked-up daily.

That’s an interesting phenomenon. It makes inflation much worse because the velocity of money increases dramatically and it is equivalent to more money in the system. That’s probably why you have to raise rates and keep them high for a very long time - to convince everyone it’s OK to hold cash.

 
 
Comment by Hoz
2007-07-04 09:18:59

IMHO as long as the calculations of any set of numbers, whether from the government or the NAR, are consistent, the ability to predict/project future direction is just as easy as having actual numbers. The difficulty arises when inconsistency occurs. Inconsistency will skew the numbers for several months, but the greater the divergence, the greater the risk to loss of confidence in reporting agencies. This is the dilemma that the Federal Reserve currently faces with the exclusion of oil and food from CPI. The majority of people no longer believe the government’s inflation figures.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by salinasron
2007-07-04 06:11:22

“The 0.5 percent dip was a much better showing than the deeper 1.2 percent decline that economists said they were expecting.”

It will come to pass. “Byproducts of the housing slump ” take time to trickle down. People lose their jobs in RE or related industries, cut back on services they use, etc, and until all the dominoes are set in motion numbers can be covered up or explained away.

 
 
Comment by LongIslandLost
2007-07-04 05:06:37

I work for a company that makes instruments used in chemical laboratories. We sell all over the world. We are selling more than last year both in the US and abroad.

There are things that the US manufacturer that are very competitive. Airplanes, manufacturing equipment, instruments, and chemicals spring to mind. Yes, there are foreign competitors in all of these areas. Look at commercial airplanes. In the U.S., there is Boeing. In Europe, there is Airbus. Some years Boeing is doing well, some years, Airbus is doing well. But, Boeing is not being put out of business by Airbus.

Comment by palmetto
2007-07-04 05:22:47

Good point, LongIsland, not all is lost yet. I don’t know about you, but in conversations with my fellow man-on-the-street, there’s a new sense of awakening out there. We CAN turn it around. Something CAN be done about this mess.

 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-07-04 07:20:34

“But, Boeing is not being put out of business by Airbus.”

How many businesses can count on billions of dollars in defense contracts? Strip that away and how well are they doing? I’d like to see an example of a manufacturing industry that isn’t so heavily subsidized by Uncle Sam.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-07-04 07:59:09

Plus Airbus has experienced a few stumbles of its own….otherwise Boeing would not have a few of its orders right now.

Comment by arroyogrande
2007-07-04 08:51:35

Wait, it sounds like you are saying “if everything was going *perfectly* for it’s competitor, Boeing would not have a few of its orders right now”.

Things rarely go perfectly…Boeing is just as competetive (or not competative) as Airbus. Airbus made a bet on “big”, while Boeing made a bet on “fuel effecient”. I’ll leave for you to decide what was the better long term bet.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-07-05 05:08:54

Stale thread now but I was referring to the cancellations Airbus was experiencing when they were having production issues. Didn’t Boeing end up getting those contracts when the clients rescinded the original award to Airbus? I believe it was a a year or so ago but could be more.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by scdave
2007-07-04 08:18:45

Exactly NYboy……

 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2007-07-04 09:17:16

Airbus is more heavily subsidized than Boeing. And what’s wrong with selling to the government? I’d rather have the gov. spend money directly on its constitutionally mandated obligations than to make outrageous and completely unconstitutional transfer payments.

Comment by not a gator
2007-07-04 12:30:24

I’ve read up on Boeing and some authors have argued that Boeing is subsidized too, just not directly by the US govt.

In the end, they’re both subsidized about equally, and it really comes down to who’s building a better airplane this year. Prior statements in this thread about how they’re doing seem about right to me.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-07-04 08:29:41

Wait until China starts making airplanes.

Comment by arroyogrande
2007-07-04 08:53:07

They’ve been making airplanes since day one…their air force is full of home-made Russian designs.

Comment by Hoz
2007-07-04 09:10:54

I believe that Darrell is referring to the following facts. China currently makes short range passenger planes. China is bidding for Airbus’ six plants that are being auctioned off as part of Airbus’s restructuring. China is planning on entering the Jumbo market by 2020 and for Airbus and Boeing to receive the current orders the wing manufacturing will occur in China. The wing assembly is the only area of expertise that the US has in airplane manufacturing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by josemanolo7
2007-07-04 20:39:49

you mean jet engine and avionics are not?

 
 
 
Comment by Neil
2007-07-04 14:52:54

They are…

And they are making them to out of date concepts. Aircraft is a very competitive market. If one is 7% more fuel efficient than the other… the older one cannot garner new customers except at mind boggling discounts. At a 15% difference… the less efficient design stops selling (in the free market).

So will China make airplanes? Sure. Will they compete for very long in the Western world? Not at first. Later maybe.

But this discussion belongs on airliners.net. ;)

Got popcorn?
Neil

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2007-07-04 19:10:47

We certainly wouldn’t want “Chicago based” Boeing to fall on hard times and hurt the Chicago executive condo market.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2007-07-04 05:29:14

House across the street finally sold after 6 months on the market and several price reductions to . . . .

a flipper

UFB. The guy is burnt toast and he doesn’t even know it yet. 20 something smarmy little knowitall too. Sits in his SUV in front of the place on his cell phone while his illegal alien contractors toss in the granite countertops.

I’m trying to think about what I can do that’s legal to make sure he can’t sell the place any time soon. Of course, I’m sure he’ll take care of that himself by pricing it too high.

Comment by palmetto
2007-07-04 05:34:04

“I’m trying to think about what I can do that’s legal to make sure he can’t sell the place any time soon.”

Why, you evil little dickens, you. (LOL).

 
Comment by packman
2007-07-04 05:42:27

Ha ha. Keep us posted!

 
Comment by Pen
2007-07-04 05:51:38

Try dressing in camoflage and sitting on a couch drinking PBR talls, everytime the house is shown.

Also, buy a used Honda Civic, lower it to an inch of the ground, paint yellow stripes on it, hang a non-US flag from the mirror, tint the windows, put on a muffler with a 6 inch wide tailpipe, a rear spoiler that stands 20 inches off of the trunk, makes sure the 4 wheels don’t match…

Comment by Pen
2007-07-04 05:52:09

makes = make

 
Comment by txchick57
2007-07-04 05:54:58

That hurts my eyes to even think about.

Comment by Pen
2007-07-04 05:56:21

good..now, would you buy the house across the street from it?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by spacepest
2007-07-05 04:01:34

Or you could do what some neighbors did to relatives of mine who were pissed off at them and found out they were trying to sell their home…invite the local christian rock band to play in your garage during the daytime when open house hours were. And everytime a realtor or any other person shows up and parks a car in their neighbor’s driveway. When I first heard that gawdawful loud band next door to my relatives house, I knew exactly then why their house hadn’t sold, despite being clean and decently priced at the time.

 
 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-07-04 07:23:20

“Try dressing in camoflage and sitting on a couch drinking PBR talls, everytime the house is shown.

Also, buy a used Honda Civic, lower it to an inch of the ground, paint yellow stripes on it, hang a non-US flag from the mirror, tint the windows, put on a muffler with a 6 inch wide tailpipe, a rear spoiler that stands 20 inches off of the trunk, makes sure the 4 wheels don’t match…”

Hey Pen, she lives in Texas. I don’t think that strategy will work. It might actually help the house sell quicker.

 
Comment by Mugsy
2007-07-04 07:31:15

I used to clean my guns in the driveway to keep my neighbors on edge.

Comment by JimAtLaw
2007-07-04 09:25:16

And I thought I was the only one… ;-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Hoz
2007-07-04 09:40:51

If I did that the neighbors would bring their guns over thinking we were going shooting and having a party later. LOL

 
Comment by JimAtLaw
2007-07-04 11:24:55

Well, of course… how else do you spend a holiday weekend? :-D

 
Comment by tj & the bear
2007-07-04 17:00:16

Ah, good times! Used to get everyone together to shoot clay pigeons in the field right across the street…

 
 
 
 
Comment by lost in utah
2007-07-04 08:29:29

Get a recording of baying Beagles and play it really loud when they have showings so they think you have a pack next door.

Comment by AHinOH
2007-07-04 10:41:29

This is evil, and I love it.

 
Comment by tj & the bear
2007-07-04 17:02:41

Add a BIG sign for that rescue you work with, tx!

 
 
Comment by saywhat?
2007-07-04 09:26:17

“I’m trying to think about what I can do that’s legal to make sure he can’t sell the place any time soon. Of course, I’m sure he’ll take care of that himself by pricing it too high”

TxChick - I’m going through a similar situation - I went through Bexar County RE records and found out this flipper has 3 owner occupied loans out there. I’m in touch with the lender on the property (lot) he bought next door. He will undoubtedly ruin the lot by building a house that won’t sell (and totally screw up my view). I’m not sure where I go from there if the lender doesn’t pull the loan - I guess Paladin would know.

 
Comment by Wickedheart
2007-07-04 09:28:39

Get a drum set.

 
Comment by auger-inn
2007-07-04 15:12:21

You might consider reproducing and replacing all of the flyers he puts in the RE box out front with one that adds other key information somewhere in the text. Stuff like flipper purchase date and price, upgrades and likely cost of those as well as a likely lowball price that might be successful to a bidder.
I would blend the new language into the existing format/style in such a way as to be un-noticeable to the casual glance and then keep the box full so that none of the old ones are added back. Just a thought.

 
 
Comment by Pen
2007-07-04 05:57:04

Good morning all,

HD74, are you lurking by any chance?

Pen

 
Comment by david cee
2007-07-04 06:00:54

Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano on Monday signed into law a bill imposing strict sanctions on employers that knowingly hire illegal immigrants.
Local business groups quickly denounced the governor’s decision, saying the law will depress the Arizona business climate.

House Bill 2779, also called the Legal Arizona Workers Act, will become law Jan 1.

Arizona businesses that “knowingly” or “intentionally” hire illegal immigrants face a temporary license suspension. A judge could order the employer to immediately terminate all undocumented workers and impose a three- to five-year probationary period.

A second violation during the probation period would result in a permanent revocation of the business’s operating license.

The Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry denounced the bill, calling it “a blow to Arizona businesses” and “a devastating setback to the state’s economy.”

Employer sanctions are a necessary piece of comprehensive immigration reform but should be enacted at the federal level, said Glenn Hamer, president and chief executive of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

“Arizona’s elected officials have caved to the political pressure of this emotional issue and deflected the burden for a national immigration problem onto the backs of businesses in Arizona,” Hamer said in a written statement.

Rep. Russell Pierce, R-Mesa, a key sponsor, called the bill “the most significant piece of legislation passed in the nation,” and said it protects businesses that follow the law.

“We have an obligation to protect Arizona’s honest employers and go after the illegal employers,” Pierce said. “This is a huge win for honest, law-abiding citizens in the state of Arizona.”

Comment by GotRocks
2007-07-04 06:13:14

This thing looks like it has some teeth to it. Go Arizona!!

Comment by Hoz
2007-07-04 09:44:16

Go Arizona, another blast to the housing market. Government, in any form, cannot stave the housing collapse, but they can sure accelerate it!

 
 
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-07-04 07:50:18

What the elected voters caved to was “THE VOTERS”!!!!!!!!!!!

Remember when their opinion used to be considered somewhat important? Remember when something other than “this is good for business” was considered important.

If more states follow Arizona, we can put some REAL preasure on congress to REALLY lock down on illigal imigrants. Lock the illegals out of jobs, and open up legal imigration and a guest worker program.

Democrats are against guset worker because it creates a perminant underclass… WRONG… They are against it because it creates a perminiant underclass that can’t VOTE FOR THEM!!!

I’m not anti-imigrant and I’m not anti-hispanic. I’m anti ILLEGAL imigration. Any imigration reform that allows the people here illegally to stay (and that includes go home for a few weeks or months, then come back) is amnesty, and is a non-starter for the majority of Americans…. excpet Democrat politicians that see all those illegals as potential Democrat voters.

 
Comment by SteelCurtain
2007-07-04 08:14:52

I don’t think this will have much effect at all. An employer can’t tell who is illegal and who is not. All you CAN do is fill out a form, xerox their green card and send it to the INS. My friend has NEVER had the INS come back and say they are illegal, and you CAN’T act on your own suspicions as that is discrimination and you get sued. Make an identification system that works before you go after employers. Also, why is it necessary to after employers before you can build a fence?

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-07-04 08:26:21

Not exactly. The state runs a computer program that links to the fed database. When you get a business license, you get access to the system. When decide to hire someone, you enter a variety of personal info. It compares the SSN, name, address, phone number, etc to info in the database. It also tracks how many people are applying for jobs, where with that info, and flags “suspecious” activity.

By getting a business license, you agree to run your employees through the system. If the system says “ok”, your okay.

If it spits out “no”, you can hire the person while you wait for an appeal, which takes a week or two. If the person still comes up no, and you continue to employ the person anyway (or don’t run them through the system) you can lose your business license.

Comment by arroyogrande
2007-07-04 08:56:23

Nice!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by RMB
2007-07-04 09:23:34

Darrell,

I’m from California and have never heard of such a system. Been in business over 25 yrs and anytime I try to check on someones status I pretty much get the response that SteelCurtain outlined. Not only does the govt not verify that someone is illegal or not they go as far as telling me that were I to fire someone I suspected of being illegal I would open myself up to an EEOC lawsuit, that the gov’t would only be so happy to prosecute.
That’s why I get a little ticked off about all these proposals about going after employers. They will never amount to anything because there is no way to check and verify and the state has been telling employers for years they can’t do anything about it themselves.
This country is doomed it is just a matter of time.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-07-04 09:08:10

“Also, why is it necessary to after employers before you can build a fence?”

well think about it.. when word gets out that employers can’t and won’t hire them, ya don’t need a fence.

 
Comment by Liz from Boston
2007-07-04 09:09:14

My job does background checks on all new hires to verify that thehy are in the US legally. Every few months, they uncover someone who isn’t.

Also, why is it necessary to after employers before you can build a fence?

Building a fence won’t keep out illegals who enter the US legally, then overstay their visas.

Comment by JimAtLaw
2007-07-04 09:33:21

I’ve got at least a partial solution here - if you sponsor someone for a VISA, and they overstay, you should pay huge fines. (E.g., then, if a relative brings someone over, they are properly incentivized not to let that person stay.)

Also, anyone who overstays a visa should have their driver’s license, if they have one, immediately suspended and a warrant issued for the person’s arrest - as it stands right now, you can overstay your VISA, get pulled over for speeding, and just drive off with a ticket even though you’re here illegally and should be deported.

Another one - the TSA’s traveler safety system should check for expired visas and people attempting to travel by air domestically when here illegally should flagged by the system for arrest and deportation at the airport.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by JimAtLaw
2007-07-04 09:34:26

Don’t know why I capped visa there, too used to writing the other version I guess…

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-07-04 09:48:38

that’s still just nibbling around the edges of the problem. Living underground is entirely possible and a huge percentage of them already are.

Employment is the crux of the illegal immigration problem. Cut off the jobs and they will not only stop coming, they will leave voluntarily.

 
Comment by JimAtLaw
2007-07-04 11:25:46

Agreed.

 
 
 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2007-07-04 09:25:54

The whole concept that you can keep illegals out with a fence is absurd. Most illegals walk across the border as “frontera” tourists/workers/shoppers and easily get north from there. If you “shut the borders,” international trade would be asphyxiated. The only good solution is sanctions on employers.

 
 
Comment by jerry from richardson
2007-07-04 08:16:08

I notice the scumbags at the Chamber of Commerce start shreiking at having to hire Americans and paying fair wages. If everyone has to play be the same rules, then nobody is at a disadvantage. Those dirtbag are just pissed at not being able to exploit illegal immigrants who are afraid to complain about substandard wages and work conditions.

Comment by not a gator
2007-07-04 12:37:28

If everyone has to play be the same rules, then nobody is at a disadvantage.

Bingo. However, in min. wage went up, all restaurant sales would shrink (margins are already low) and some businesses would lose.

So what? There are other businesses you can go into … as those restaurant employees would finally have spending money.

1/3 of all restaurants fail anyway … or maybe it was worse than that. It’s a tough business.

 
 
 
Comment by AHinOH
2007-07-04 06:12:39

I’d like to ask the advice of the collective financial wisdom (which, great as Ben is, is equally as much the reason this blog is a must-read).

I’m moving from a very, very cheap market - our median price is about $120,000 for the metro area, although in the city proper, it’s closer to $90,000 - to a very, very expensive one, w/a median home price of $587k.

Growing up in my cheap market, I always understood that prudent financial management meant that no more than 1/4 of my income should go to housing. A pretty easy thing to do here, frankly, even with somewhat depressed wages.

Is that still true for my new market, where we will be renting instead of owning? I’ve been told by other people that a 1/3 ratio is more common/acceptable there. Any thoughts or advice on this would be much appreciated.

Now if only I could decide whether to sell my house before we move, or avoid the falling market and make it a managed rental :-)

Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-07-04 07:28:26

I rented a tiny studio in LA (1 and a half miles from the beach) for $1000 per month while neighboring condos and SFHs were going for $600,000 and up. I worked so much I hardly noticed how small the studio was. I was accumulating savings in I bonds, EE bonds, municipal bonds, precious metals, and stocks while the neighbors were using their homes as ATM machines. It was a great time - those 3 years in LA.

Comment by AHinOH
2007-07-04 08:56:23

Bill, that’s very similar to our plan - make the move, live tight as we can, and sock the rest away while enjoying the sunshine. Good to know that it actually worked for someone else.

It’s just hard to try and make prudent calculations based on a job I don’t have yet and the financial realities of a place I’ve never lived. Heck, I’ve only ever lived in two zip codes; this is a big financial and psychological change, and I’d rather not screw it up too badly.

Thanks for the encouragement!

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2007-07-04 19:18:40

I moved from 75061 to 76051. It’s a miracle I get any mail at all ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-07-04 07:30:16

I can give you my view from New York City. I don’t know if you know this but rents in this city can be pretty high. You didn’t state where you are moving but I am assuming California.

I have said before that I think the housing number is not looked at properly. You need to look at Housing + Utilities + Transportation as your monthly nut. Here in NYC we pay a ton for rent and almost nothing for transportation.

$2,800 + $200 = $3,00 (this equals rent, utilities and transportation)

I think you should look at it that way. You need to lump all of these together and then look at what portion of your check you are paying out. Just make sure it is a number that allows you to live well, fund your retirement plus save something for a rainy day. If you can do all of that then all other equations don’t mean a lot.

Comment by aNYCdj
2007-07-04 07:36:11

$80 Monthly metro card is all most NYC people pay for transportation.

Lots of NYCity folk Never own a car or have a drivers license, so no car expenses either.

So paying $2000 in rent in NYC could be a better deal then paying $1000 a month rent in the ‘burbs, and BOTH of you have to commute 20-30 miles each way to a job in 2 cars.

 
Comment by AHinOH
2007-07-04 08:08:57

That’s a good point. In CA, the transportation will likely be a killer (although I know a woman who worked in my field for 3 years w/o a driver’s license - in LA!) so I’m going to try and keep housing as low as I can, all things being relative.

I can’t tell you how much I envy you your public transit. If it were up to me, I’d rather move to NYC, largely because of the transportation issue, but also because my opportunities would be better. And it’s where all my fun girlfriends have moved. Alas, that’s not the case for my husband, and the city’s pace makes him impossibly jittery.

Damn this marriage-being-an-equal-partnership thing :-)

Comment by bill in Phoenix
2007-07-04 20:03:31

I was lucky in LA. My job was 2 miles from my apartment. I did not have to drive on a freeway to work. On the opposite side from my studio apartment in LA, was the Pacific Ocean, about 1 and a half miles away. Transportation certainly was no killer for me in LA! Whereever you go, if you keep your flexibility high, you have not only more freedom, but more options.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by NYCresident
2007-07-04 10:19:18

Yes, I own a 550 square foot home in NYC debt free, with no car. My monthly cost of home, utilities plus public transportation is $900/month. People say that NYC is expensive and that the taxes are high. Well, if I rented my home it would be $2,700/month. The imputed value for my living space, compared with my cash cost is over $22,000 per year that is not taxed by the IRS, the state or the city. Think about when you think all homes should be traded because they are overvalued.

Comment by AHinOH
2007-07-04 10:39:13

That sounds like an incredibly nice position to be in. I’d ask how you got there, but please don’t tell me anything I may have to explain to a grand jury later. ;-D

The thing is (and this point has been made here before), a home is a consumable good as well as an investment. Whenever you try to decide if a home is overvalued, if it’s your primary (hell, even secondary) residence, you have to take into account the value of the good/service that is you having a place to keep your crap as well as put up your feet and watch Heroes reruns.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NYCresident
2007-07-04 13:10:11

In 1989, I bought a 1270 square foot home for $455,000 with a 20% down payment. Within a few years I had lost all of my equity in the early 90’s downturn, but I managed to hold on for six more years and sold at $590,000. I was interested in trading down to a smaller, more affordable place, and was also traumatized from the experience of having bought at the old top of the market. I found my current place listed for sale or for rent. Thankfully, I made the choice of buying, as home prices and rents escalated to new highs. Rents eased in 2002, but they are again at all time highs in Manhattan. So I did error in my initial home purchase, but eventually used the equity gains to own something smaller debt free. Had I made the decision to not sell my old place when I did, I could have rented it out to pay the mortgage and eventually sold to a neighbor for well over a $1 million. But rather than regret that second property transaction error, I am grateful for what I have. I could have easily decided to rent my current home in 1998, as it was an option offered at the time. Had I not made a commitment, I would not be in the incredibly nice position today.

 
 
 
 
Comment by tj & the bear
2007-07-04 17:09:24

Just because L.A. is considered expensive doesn’t mean you can’t find relatively cheap living quarters in decent areas. The high-end stuff tends to skew the numbers a bit.

 
 
Comment by GotRocks
2007-07-04 06:19:22

I’m not sure you’d avoid the falling market by delaying your sale - as anyone with a brain (i.e., all of us out here) believe that it will only get worse - and being an absentee landlord is not fun, at all.

As to the money to spend on an apartment, it really depends on the rest of your situation - such as whether cars are paid off, kids are getting near college, what your lifestyle is like (i.e., would you rather travel overseas or live in a really nice place), and what your actual income is. Lots of factors. My recommendation would be to compare budgets with the old house cost and the new apartment cost and see if you can get them about equal, as that should avoid lifestyle shocks.

Comment by AHinOH
2007-07-04 06:35:29

Thanks, Rocks.

We currently pay about 1/8 of our income to housing, so we’re probably out of luck, trying to keep it comparable. Unless I can fool someone into thinking I’m CEO material.

The upside is that we aren’t carrying any real debt, although I imagine we’ll incur some in the move. No kids, no car loans, and the main reason for the move is to take advantage of all the opportunities/stuff to do in the new locale. Given your model, we could probably go higher in our housing, although not suicidally so.

Personally, I’d rather sell the house. But there are 13+ properties for sale on my 4-block street and no closed sales, so I don’t feel very positive about my chances to actually unload it in time for the move. And if I put off moving until we sell the house, I fear I’ll never get out of here.

Comment by scdave
2007-07-04 08:39:55

Bite the bullet, discount the house to the point it will attract the next buyer and move on with your life…IMO, your biggest mistake will be to move without selling…Any buyer that sees a vacant house with a out-of-town seller will turn into a Piranha….

Comment by lost in utah
2007-07-04 08:53:48

very good advice

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by AHinOH
2007-07-04 09:02:07

Yeah, I know deep down you’re right. Actually, we got a letter from a investor/flipper, asking if we wanted to sell. But I don’t think his business model would accommodate what we would want to get out of the house. It’s not a lot, but around here housing is so cheap that the margins are razor thin.

Weird- I just ran a calculation and honestly, if we each earned an extra $60 a week after we moved to LA, we could afford to keep the house empty. Hmmm.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tj & the bear
2007-07-04 17:13:38

…what we would want to get out of the house.

*Want* is totally the wrong way to think about it. Getting out with whatever you can possibly salvage *is*. Every day you wait is costing you a lot more than $120/week.

 
 
 
Comment by We Rent!
2007-07-04 22:06:27

“We currently pay about 1/8 of our income to housing…”

We pay 1/10th (of gross) in San Diego. It can be done.

 
 
 
Comment by salinasron
2007-07-04 06:27:50

“The NYT accuses Isakson of placing a “squalid little amendment” in the immigration reform bill on behalf of Atlanta-based Home Depot.

The amendment would prohibit states and cities from passing laws and ordinances to mandate that Home Depot — and stores like it — erect shelters for the day laborers they attract.”
“Joan Kirchner, speaking for Isakson, makes two points in a quick e-mail:

“No cities have passed a law yet, but there have been a number of localities (as many as a half dozen we’re told) that have told Home Depot they won’t issue a business license unless Home Depot builds a shelter on its property for day laborers. These obligations are costly and represent an unwarranted interference by the government with the rights of businesses to use and operate their property.”

“The liability issues are huge. If there is an incident between a day laborer and a Home Depot customer, for example, is Home Depot responsible then for the actions of that day laborer or that customer when the company was told by the municipality that they had to build a facility that is a magnet for these day laborers to congregate on their property? Home Depot is not guaranteed any protections against lawsuits.”
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/shared-blogs/ajc/politicalinsider/entries/2007/06/22/isakson_home_depot_and_the_nyt.html

Comment by spike66
2007-07-04 06:36:32

I’d like to see the NYTImes erect a shed for daylaborers in front of its offices…there’s a place on the lower east side where illegals looking for cleaning work line up…why not in front of the Times?
Let the Sulzbergers pay for any liability claims, and let the ever-concerned Times employees enjoy having the Third World camped on their sidewalks.

Comment by palmetto
2007-07-04 07:15:24

Amen, spike.

Comment by auger-inn
2007-07-04 08:11:37

Exactly, these idiotic do-gooders don’t have any problem spending someone else’s money. Let’s see how they react when it comes out of their own pocket.
Quite frankly, if there is a place where groups of known criminals are hanging out, why wouldn’t a legislator be asking why the police weren’t going there and rounding them up instead of writing legislation to force the business to build them shelter?
This whole immigration debate has been derailed and obfuscated by other interests.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2007-07-04 12:41:51

We have plenty of day laborers in Gainesville who are American natives with English names. What laws are they breaking? Last I checked, it wasn’t against the law to be a recovering loser alcoholic.

 
 
 
 
Comment by jerry from richardson
2007-07-04 08:20:41

Like I said before, home Depot needs to call the police on those people for soliciting. They have no right to congregate on HD’s property looking for work. If HD allows it, then they deserve what they get. If I saw a HD with a bunch of people loitering outside, I would not shop there

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-07-04 08:33:00

The cops don’t come out. When the cops used to come out and arrest the people, they’d take them to the INS for deportation. But, the INS no longer takes the illegals off the hands of the police, so the police no longer round them up.

Comment by JimAtLaw
2007-07-04 09:20:58

Heck, here in L.A. it is official policy for the police not to ask people their immigration status or to turn them over to the INS - even illegal immigrants arrested for other crimes are routinely put back on the street rather than deported. How many of those people do you think show back up in court after release?

Mayor Villaraigosa basically officially supports granting full amnesty to illegal immigrants for all criminal activity, past and present, since those people will then vote in elections for him, whether legally or illegally. This would be that “long train of abuses and usurpations” thing…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-07-04 07:14:34

Yankee Doodle got a home

A-Riding on a loan, please

They stuck a sign where it’s at

And called in the foreclosure police…

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2007-07-04 07:24:19

Just in case it doesn’t make it past bens filters here is the link:

http://www.lyricsfreak.com/b/big+l/ebonics_20017536.html

Great Lyrics to blast in your SUV TXChick when he is having an open house

 
Comment by Zion Renter
2007-07-04 07:56:35

I know that you see these all the time. But its still shocking.
http://www.stgeorgerealestateinfo.com/Nav.aspx/Page=http://www.listingpreview.com/idx/11cb12.html
When are these people going to see that the partys over.

Comment by bradthemod
2007-07-04 09:40:14

Do a thought experiment and imagine yourself buying these properties in hopes of renting them out. Then think about safer investments/low-risk bond type investments. How much upside is there left in real estate for the J6P ?

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-07-04 08:05:39

If the GAO claims the FHA already faces a problem of adverse selection, just watch what happens if Congress’s plan to turn it into a subprime lender w/ higher conformable lending limits and zero-down loans comes to pass. You ain’t seen nothing yet!

Auditors score Federal Housing Administration’s business plan
By DANIEL FRIEDMAN
July 03, 2007

The Federal Housing Administration’s plan to overhaul its insurance program to compete with private competitors could save money but risks failure, according to the Government Accountability Office.

FHA, part of the Housing and Urban Development Department, helps many low-income home buyers by insuring private lender mortgages against borrower defaults. According a new GAO report, however, private insurers have been eating into FHA’s market share, reducing it from 19 percent to 6 percent from 2001 to 2005. Subprime loans, in particular, have been used as alternatives to FHA-insured mortgages, though often at high costs to borrowers.

The private lenders have lured away lower-risk borrowers, leaving FHA with more defaults to cover — a problem called “adverse selection.”

http://federaltimes.com/index.php?S=2874160

Comment by jerry from richardson
2007-07-04 08:26:21

Go ahead and drag the taxpayers deeper into the manure pit. It should also help prop up housing prices by getting more unqualified people into homedebtorship.

 
Comment by lainvestorgirl
2007-07-04 08:39:16

I have a solution…scrap the FHA altogether. And while you’re at it, HUD and its stupid Section 8 program too.

 
Comment by nhz
2007-07-04 08:39:26

can’t say it enough: they have probably taken a good look at the Netherlands where an organisation similar to the new FHA has been highly successfull in propping up home prices for the last 10 years or so. It is a proven concept!

Every idiot here can get a risk-free 0-down mortgage up to the value of the average home (around 250K, adjusted regularly for increasing prices). If the home ever has to be sold at a loss the mortgage insurance fund will eat the loss, so the buyer can never loose. Because of the government insurance, these buyers get even lower mortgage rates than normal buyers. This all works great as long as home prices are rising, so home prices must keep rising forever and the Dutch goverment will do everything it can to keep the housing pyramid expanding. Netherlands is probably the only country in the world that spends more on housing subsidies than on education and healthcare … I just wonder where the US is going to find the room for this in their strapped budget.

Comment by Siggi
2007-07-04 10:01:55

nhz: This is also so different in Germany. The government here has stopped all subsidies on housing.

Comment by not a gator
2007-07-04 12:44:54

I have to know: did the rents come down?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Siggi
2007-07-04 13:57:04

There are no new numbers about rents yet. But housing starts have declined some 25%, so I expect prices to come down.

About rents: They are very diverse in Germany. Relatively high in Munich or Stuttgart, low (5 EUR/m²) in Berlin.

 
Comment by not a gator
2007-07-04 15:00:10

Guh?! I’m moving to Berlin! It’s fricking cheaper than Florida, and the weather isn’t so … sunny. *shudder*

Kind of stinks how it’s hard to get a job in Europe these days if you aren’t of European nationality. Ditto Canada, etc. I’d say it’s the same everywhere, but apparently it’s easier to get a job in a technical area in the US if you aren’t a US citizen.

“Perhaps it would be time for a ‘colorful metaphor’?”

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2007-07-04 08:11:15

Then: First time home-buyers snared mortgages.

Now: Mortgages ensnare first-time home buyers.

FHA: A new relevance
By Joanne Cleaver
MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL

OVER THE PAST eight years, the Federal Housing Authority has become less and less important.
Subprime lenders offering high-cost loans won away many of the moderate-income first-time home buyers who used to count on an FHA guarantee to snare a mortgage.

Home prices rose far above FHA lending limits, set by Congress and unchanged for years. And though the agency streamlined some of its procedures, it still takes far longer than 24 hours to approve an FHA loan, unlike the instant gratification that lures eager buyers to hard-marketing subprime lenders.

The number of loans guaranteed by the FHA dropped two-thirds nationally from 1999 to 2006.

Now, the FHA’s resurrection may be at hand. Legislation aimed at modernizing obsolete FHA loan standards is back in Congress, having died quietly last fall after passing the House.

Then, nobody much cared. They do now, says Megan H. Booth, senior policy representative for the National Association of Realtors.

“This is a critical window. There’s all this congressional concern about the subprime mess, with horror stories in every district. This is our time to get Congress to say: ‘If we can reform this program, we can give people a viable alternative that’s not risky like these crazy loans,’” she says.

“How many hearings has Congress had this spring on subprime? A gazillion. FHA reform can’t be a bailout to subprime problems, but it can be a solution.”

http://www.contracostatimes.com/realestatenews/ci_6276040

Comment by nhz
2007-07-04 10:20:35

“it still takes far longer than 24 hours to approve an FHA loan”
“Legislation aimed at modernizing obsolete FHA loan standards”
“a viable alternative that’s not risky like these crazy loans”

sounds definitely like they are aiming for free loans for everyone and zero loan standards. The brightest guys and gals at JPM & the FED are probably working on some new kind of miracle CDO to make it all possible.

 
 
Comment by David
2007-07-04 08:59:11

Six years ago, there was a tremendous housing shortage, particularly in the most desireable cities; and particularly affordable housing in city centers. A logical solution to this problem would have been for local governments to reduce zoning restrictions, work with developers to build more “in-fill” and multifamily housing.
But no, this is america and local politics are dominated by NIMBY interests. So instead we have a nationwide (worldwide) opening of liquidity. When the price of houses triples, it suddenly makes sense for developers to start working in hard to develope places. NOW we do have new houses being built in just about every city, including the hardest to develope like San Francisco and Berkeley CA. This housing is not affordable, but the new economics make it profitable for the developers to outwait the planning comissions of these cities.
Now for stage 2, the nationwide price of houses drops 50%. Now we have new housing units and they are affordable; problem solved. Unfortunately in the process we are bankrupting 40 million families, and some of our finest financial institutions are in critical condition.
If we needed some more housing in the desieable areas and more affordable housing in these areas, why couldnt we just have built it without housing prices taking a roundtrip to the moon.

Comment by Liz from Boston
2007-07-04 09:27:25

Sounds like Boston. The only housing that gets built here is 1- and 2-bedroom “luxury condos”. Any “affordable” units are inevitably for the 55+ crowd.

To many people, lack of affordable housing makes a place desireable.

Comment by yogurt
2007-07-05 00:38:51

All housing has to be affordable to someone. Otherwise it doesn’t get sold or rented.

It doesn’t matter whether new housing stock is “luxury” or low-end. It’s the same pool of buyers and renters, and the places are only going to go for what the people can afford, no matter what they cost to build.

Developers who build new housing that is too rich for the market are just cutting their own throats.

 
 
Comment by nhz
2007-07-04 10:15:31

at least it worked better than in some parts of Europe, where home prices increased by 600-1000% and the shortage (although relatively small) is still the same as before the price surge :(
People will be bankrupted all the same when the tide turns.

Obviously the roundtrip is necessary to provide a massive transfer of wealth from the middle class to the happy few (RE mob, developers, WallStreet, upper 1% or so of income earners).

 
Comment by Liz from Boston
2007-07-05 00:07:44

Today’s Globe had an opinion piece about the ethics of zoning out families.

 
 
Comment by dwkunkel
2007-07-04 09:07:40

Here’s an excellent explanation for what’s going on in the CDO market: Investment Landfill

 
Comment by Liz from Boston
2007-07-04 09:22:50

Two great New York Times articles on real estate. The first details how using your home as an ATM got so popular. The second is about a new twist in mortgage fraud.

Comment by AHinOH
2007-07-04 10:10:38

“Through the 1960s and ’70s, owners’ equity ranged from 65 to 70 percent. As recently as 1983, some 52 percent of American homeowners who were 55 to 65 years old owned their homes without any mortgage debt — allowing them to be free of monthly installment payments during their retirement years. By 2004, however, that percentage had dropped to 36 percent, according to Federal Reserve data.”

That’s enough to send shivers down my spine - my parents are destined to be on the wrong end of this one.

 
 
Comment by NoVa RE Supernova
2007-07-04 11:38:04

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2007/3427pensions_hedges.html

New Pension Crisis Seen In Credit Markets Crash
by Paul Gallagher
The International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) released a report June 22 to its members in 153 countries, urging them to pull their pension funds’ investments out of hedge funds and private equity funds. The ITUC, with many examples, showed that pension funds’ returns from investing in these locust funds have done no better, or lagged behind, ordinary stock market investments: in the case of private-equity-fund investments, for nearly a decade; and in the case of investment in hedge funds, since 2005. It also warned that private-equity takeovers—heavily using pension funds’ invested assets—have been shrinking the stock markets for public stocks into which pension funds have traditionally been invested; that they pit older workers’ interests against those of younger workers in the pension plans; and that the debt bubbles these funds are building up, are threatening a collapse of financial markets “as soon as credit conditions change.”

Credit conditions are now rapidly changing for the worse (see p. 62), and pension funds—with between 3% and 5% of their investments in hedge funds (including hedge “funds of funds”) alone, depending on the report—are directly in the path of disaster. In the past two years, many public pension funds in the United States have added to their hedge-fund investments, their own direct purchase of the super-risky mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and their derivative collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) with which hedge funds and investment banks play. Analysts at real estate investment trusts and banks, warn EIR that the huge losses seen coming in these housing-bubble securities (losses in the hundreds of billions of dollars) are going to create a second-wave pension crisis in the United States.

The first wave was low returns and corporate cutbacks of pension contributions from the 1997-98 financial crises through 2005, worsened by Fed chairman Alan Greenspan’s drastic lowering of interest rates. The second wave will be outright losses, stemming from pension funds’ efforts to “make up” for the earlier crisis by plunging into hedge funds and private equity funds, looking for high-return “junk” to invest in. From junk, they have progressed to “toxic waste.”

(Con’t)

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post