Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For August 26, 2007
Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.
Examining the home price boom and its effect on owners, lenders, regulators, realtors and the economy as a whole.
Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.
On my street there is a house that’s having an estate sale/open house. They’re selling the house for 399k and, no kidding, the roof is slowly sliding off to the front of the house. Mind you, there hasn’t been a sale of a house for under 500k on our street since 2003/04.
Either the neighbors are freaking out over their ruined comps or they’re thrilled that someone may potentially fix up the eyesore.
Where is this, Danni? I don’t mean a specific address, just a state or region of a state.
Seaford, Long Island.
Spree…
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/26/business/yourmoney/26country.html?_r=2&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
I get the impression that “former employees” will be poping out of the woodwork to give their take on how the evil machine was run.
I can’t help but roll my eyes.
Lemme clarify,
In my experience with the handful of sleazier of mortgage reps, it always seemed to me that they got juiced by being part of this hyped business and loved being with the inside crowd. Now that they’re goin’ down they need to grab their few precious moments of being in the know.
Annoying.
Those “former” employees should not be hired anywhere in the fianancial world. They are as guilty as Mozillo and his corporate machine. In my book, buying Countrywide stock is like buying tobacco stocks. Time to clean up this country and put some of these people out of business.
Awesome story, wmbz. The only thing that Countrywide is missing are the guys who call up and threaten to break your legs if you don’t pay.
What makes you think they are missing these guys? Maybe this is a story which remains to be told…
LOL, PB.
–
That is the Indian Banking Way when it comes to consumer credit. I first heard it first-hand from a mid-level manager of one of the largest banks in India, ICICI, during my last trip to India. Later I learned that the Citi Bank also has a room full of goondas (thugs to beat up people) in case they are needed.
Debt business invariably turns ugly and sinful. Only a moron would invest in the Indian stock market. We have problems and India has bigger problems of fraud and corruption.
Jas
what do you think commissions will be in the future .5% max ,if that
I just got a pre-qual letter from Countrywide. In CA, you have to fully disclose the back end fees and I made it clear I knew that. Par loan to me, .5% fee paid to the broker by CFC.
The old adage is coming into play this year: Twice the work for half the money!
30-year fixed, 20% down by the way. And under $417,000. Ben has taught me well (….except it is probably too soon to be buying stuff! The property is owned by CFC and my offer was 38% off the 2006 sales price and $185,000 less than their original 80/10 loan.)
Jingle,
It may not be too soon to buy, provided your offer properly reflects the likely future landscape of the mortgage world. If I were going to try buying a home at the moment, I would start by putting pencil to paper and computing the purchase budget of a median income household for the area I was thinking of buying, assuming 0% downpayment, payments at 30% of income (i.e., make the purchase fully reflect the opportunity cost of household capital and traditional underwriting standards) and current market interest rates. Then I would subtract another 10% from the estimated purchase budget to reflect overshooting of the falling knife. This is what I would use as a starting point for figuring out how much to offer.
“assuming…”
One should also assume a 30-year-fixed (amortizing, not exotic) loan…
PB, I will pay the equivalent of my current rent, on an after tax basis. That works for me. I used a 5% return on my $80,000 equity, since I could get that in Treasuries, where 70% of my money is parked.
The only dangers I can think of are two: 1) “equivilent” rents could fall and 2) my tax bracket could drop (current is 28% marginal for the Fed, 8.2% marginal for the state).
Never the less, the offering prices are 28.6% less than the lowest sale price in the area.
“I will pay the equivalent of my current rent, on an after tax basis”
That is another good rule of thumb. Given Jumbo loan rates at current rates of 8 percent and assuming a 30-year fixed rate (non-exotic / amortizing) mortgage, the monthly nut on a $500,000 home would run north of $3600, before including insurance, property taxes, HOA dues, maintenance, yard care service costs and potential home equity losses in a falling-price market. The interest may be tax deductible, but only to the extent the itemized Sch A deductions (including mortgage interest) exceed the standard deduction.
This compares to rents around $2400 a month on comparable properties in SD (and I am being very conservative here!). So this suggests roughly a 33% haircut off recent sale price levels would be needed to equilibrate rents and purchase prices.
Small wonder proponents of welfare for the wealthy want to raise those GSE conforming loan limits!
My local bank Banner Bank will loan 500k on a 550k house at 7.375% with 1.875 points.
“…will loan 500k on a 550k house at 7.375%…”
Who qualifies for that rate? I would assume mainly buyers with a $50,000 downpayment they are willing to sink into overpriced housing, at risk of losing it to the falling knife, and who also have high FICO scores. This straw man description of a current buyer brings to mind a favorite viola joke (slightly modified to make my point)…
“You come to a fork in the road and are unsure which way to go. Standing at the intersection are Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and a good viola player.
Q. Whom do you ask for directions?
A. None of them; all three are just figments of your imagination…”
http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~dufour/HUMOR/music.html
No 1099’s - SLAM!!!!!
The IRS better go after this. Penalties equal 100% of what was not reported.
Independent brokers who have worked with Countrywide also say the company does not provide records of their compensation to the Internal Revenue Service on a Form 1099, as the law requires. These brokers say that all other home lenders they have worked with submitted 1099s disclosing income earned from their associations.
One broker who worked with Countrywide for seven years said she never got a 1099.
“When I got ready to do my first year’s taxes I had received 1099s from everybody but Countrywide,” she said. “I called my rep and he said, ‘We’re too big. There’s too many. We don’t do it.’ ”
I hope the IRS goes after this, big time, crispy. It would appear to be a very lucrative area of investigation. The IRS oughta be gearing up for a field day, considering the widespread fraud generated by the housing bubble.
IRS will have to subpoena employee records from Countrywide. But if they were running so fast and loose, there may be no records. Could be a very difficult puzzle for the IRS to solve to go after each employee (your employer’s name is not part of your tax return). Hopefully they’ll just go after the officers (including Mozillo).
Anyone can call attention to poential tax issues to the IRS. If you search irs.gov, you will find a form you can submit. However, the form asks you to estimate the amount of tax that will be collected and that you submit the taxpayer id number of the person/entity invovlved. Nice if you have it, but not very realistic.
You can also submit information about tax evasion through a simple letter to the Commissioner. To report Country Wide, you can write directly to the LMSB (Large and Mid-Sized Business) Commissioner, Debora M. Nolan. Explain that you have credible evidence that Country Wide has failed to report income to their brokers for however many years you think it happened. State that the company has been regularly in the news and give examples (quotes by Senators and Representatives are especially useful). State that they may have been assisting (say “aiding and abetting”) in tax fraud committed by their agents by not reporting their commissions to the IRS. IF you can find a broker who would be willing to talk to an IRS agent name them and give contact information. If you can’t, refer to anyone who may have been quoted in a newspaper article. State that you are going to send a letter to W&I (see below) about this issue as well.
You can send a similar letter to the W&I (Wage and Investment) Commissioner, Richard Morgante explaining that thousands of brokers who worked for Country Wide may have received large commissions that were never reported to the IRS on 1099’s. State that you have already reported the issue to LMSB. Include a copy of your letter to the LMSB Commissioner. Doing a good job on this will require a cross division project and that takes a bit more red tape so let them know about it so they can start on it early. If you know a broker who can confirm that people talked about not reporting Country Wide commissions (even if they can’t give names) because of lack of 1099’s, name that person and give contact information (check with the person first, of course).
Any of these letters can be addressed to the IRS at 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW; Washington, DC 20224. Do it soon. Mail to the IRS is irradiated, so it takes a while to be processed. You can find fax numbers on irs.gov.
Also, you can write to your Senator and Representative with the same information. Their staff will forward it to the IRS, but they might start talking about it too. Anyone on a banking committee is great since they have a natural means for talking about this stuff. Since Congress is at home now, better to send it to the local office, but the DC office is OK too. Staffers are still around.
You will receive a letter back stating that for privacy reasons you can’t be told about what is actually happening, but there is an ongoing audit program, all information is considered, etc.
…and one other letter:
While the IRS is (finally) rifling through the files over at Countrywide, they may want to take a look at all of those “stated income” loan applications, and look particularly at the “stated” amounts of earnings. Then compare them to the reported 1040 numbers, and if they match, no problem.
…of course if they do not match, you’re looking at two sworn documents in conflict. It would be reasonable for the IRS to, how do say, “review”, yes, review the tax returns of those people, to see if they paid the proper taxes.
I actually think that there is a HUGE amount of money sitting there to be grabbed, maybe enough to close half of the deficit.
Not really practical. Of the two documents, it is far more likely that the mortgage application was incorrect. The IRS assesses taxes on a number that it thinks is the actual income of the taxpayer, not some fantasy on a mortgage application. The fact that it was sworn to doesn’t make it credible. You might be able to start an audit project like that if you doubled the number of revenue agents working in Wage and Investment. Maybe. It would take 5-10 years just to hire and train them and that is assumning you had the funding in place and could post the announcement on USAJOBS tomorrow. Oh, and you would have to double the staff in the taxpayer advocate service too.
If you know of a high profile person, go ahead and report it. You want to suggest an audit program like that? Go ahead and write the letter. I’d be fascinated to hear what the response they would give.
“To report Country Wide, you can write directly to the LMSB (Large and Mid-Sized Business) Commissioner, Debora M. Nolan. ”
Unfortunately, the IRS has a history of going after individuals and various other small fry as these little guys don’t have the legal muscle to hit back (remember the hearings during Clinton’s Presidency). Much easier pickings going after the aforementioned than lawyer rich entities. Sad but true.
DOC
I know what you’re saying Polly, but there actually is a lot of unreported income that somehow manages to find its way into a mortgage application, especially among self-employed contractors.
The IRS could, if they did look at these applications, could give the borrower a choice: Either pay up on taxes, per the stated amount in the mortgage application, or, if the borrower continues to insist on that the IRS number is correct, threaten to refer him to Justice to deal with criminal mortgage fraud.
It would be fun to see the fallout.
I think the only penalty for not filing is 1099 is $50 per occurance. Not much risk there for CFC.
Yes, but what about all the brokers who either failed to file or fudged the numbers? Just the threat of an audit is enuf to make some people fork over.
I am CPA. The penalty can be equal to the amount not filed. Will this happen? Doubtful, but I can dream…
You mean CFC could get a penalty equal to the amount of taxes a broker did not file? I would bet that most brokers still filed reasonably accurately, because they never knew if that 1099 would be issued. (I’m not a broker, but) I have clients that should have issued me a 1099 but never have, but I wouldn’t think of not declaring the income - I value my sleep.
augh…”filing A 1099….” I just got my coffee, have yet to sip it. Oh…that’s better (sipping now). Renive toothpicks holding eyelids open….stretch…
LOL.
I am trying to find the link for this, its too early…Maybe I was asleep in my last continuing education class…
OK - its 10%
The Intentional Disregard of the Rules and Regulations Penalty amounts to:
10 percent of the total amount required to be reported on the information returns for dividends, patronage dividends, interest, fishing boat operators, royalties, and wage and tax statement
http://www.irs.gov/irm/part20/ch01s12.html
Report it to the IRS. Get the 15% reward on the penalty. Let’s see, if the brokers made $1 billion in 1099 income, then 10% is $100 million. Your 15% reward is $15 million……nevermind, I am dialing 1-800-tax-fraud now.
LMAO!!!
15% reward on the penalty, or what they actually collect from the insolvent tax debtor?
Ah, but how many workers that didn’t get 1099’s from Countrywide, actually reported their income to the IRS. There’s where the bucks are.
Right it’s against the law to not give 1099’s to anyone that you’ve paid over $500-600, I think. Anyone know for sure?
It used to be $600. That was in the early 90s. I don’t know what it is now.
Yep, still $600
A different broker supplied an e-mail message from a Countrywide official stating that it was not company practice to submit 1099s?
reminds me of many cuban businesses that operate in miami//
Speaking of which, the rumor on the streets of Little Havana is that Fidel has bit the biscuit. I can’t even begin to imagine the confusion that will be generated by his passing, even if his brother is in control. I remember when the first rumors of his imminent demise hit the airwaves. Senator Martinez immediately got on TV (never met a camera he didn’t like) and urged the citizens of Cuba to stay put. LMAO! Martinez got out of Cuba, becomes a politician, tries to get an amnesty passed that would mostly benefit illegals from Mexico and Central America, but tries to wag his finger at his former fellow countrymen. Politics in America: Is this a great country, or what?
another vacation destination?
‘But providing “the best loan possible” to customers wasn’t always the bank’s main goal, say some former employees. Instead, potential borrowers were often led to high-cost and sometimes unfavorable loans that resulted in richer commissions for Countrywide’s smooth-talking sales force, outsize fees to company affiliates providing services on the loans, and a roaring stock price that made Countrywide executives among the highest paid in America.’
I am so glad our Fed went to bat to save this upstanding lending institution.
Was thinking the same thing.
Maybe the FED’s time would be better spent putting in some banking regs.
Or putting some teeth behind the regs already on the books, perhaps?
Nah, Countrywide is a “dead man walking”. The latest moves were only to provide breathing room for the rest of the financial system.
Quite possibly they are being kept alive to be used as an Enron-like poster child.
‘“In terms of being unresponsive to what was happening, to sticking it out the longest, and continuing to justify the garbage they were selling, Countrywide was the worst lender,” said Ira Rheingold, executive director of the National Association of Consumer Advocates. “And anytime states tried to pass responsible lending laws, Countrywide was fighting it tooth and nail.”
Started as Countrywide Credit Industries in New York 38 years ago by Angelo R. Mozilo, a butcher’s son from the Bronx,…’
Like father, like son.
Angelo Mozillo = Ken Lay of the lending mess
Mark my words.
Maybe. But somewhat surprisingly, Enron did not qualify for too-big-to-fail protection from the Fed, while CFC does. Perhaps if Kenny Boy had diversified into the mortgage lending sector, it would have worked out better for him?
Angelo Mozillo = Ken Lay of the lending mess
I agree, except with Mozillo it’ll be melanoma instead of a heart attack. Other than that…
Can you say ‘class action lawsuit?’ Plenty of angry borrowers and hungry lawyers to feed this one. I am sure the attack plans are already being formulated.
And their bad lending practices go back a good 10 years or so.
Good Morning everyone:
Here is what i don’t get:
Everything in the article about the job being geared to getting the most commissions and spending all day telemarketing could have been found years ago by just answering a few ads on Craigslist and maybe taking a Loan officer job for a few days.
Some brokers even state in their ads you will be spending all day on the phone making 100-150 calls, to introduce people to our products.
Here is maybe the new scam:
Timberline Capital is seeking Team Leaders, Team Managers, Full Teams, and natural sales people for our new office located 1 block from Grand central Station in the heart of Manhattan. Mortgage brokers and experienced salesman are a perfect match for this new and exciting industry. Teams, Closers and experience in telemarketing is looked highly upon.
As we can all agree the mortgage industry is crumbling and now would be the best time to get in on the ground level of a new industry.
What we offer is every mortgage brokers / salesman’s dream: huge commission payouts for providing struggling businesses with the working capital they need to thrive. No licenses, No long training programs, No expenses… We provide everything…
All you need to do is SELL!
We offer the best payouts in the business with an oppturtunity at over $150k per year and a great working environment located in the heart of midtown Manhattan.
OUR INDUSTRY: To provide working capital through credit card sales (Visa, Master Card,) to a variety of business’s at any size across America. This is a fast-growing, Billion-dollar industry in the U.S.
I just realized something! My phone recorder has been blessedly clear of “we can get you into a mortgage……” calls for at least a week now. Small blessing from a monstrous mess.
This article detailed what you knew had to be the case- that off “projections” of 28 years of mortgage payments @12 or 13% after re-set, Countrywide and brokers working with them were each getting fees of $20 plus thousand dollars per loan provided they could target the borrower low enough on the totem pole.
I feel especially bad for the elderly that were taken advantage of in all of this. With the fees being paid no wonder , there were so many stories of elderly harassment until they mortgaged up
From the NY Times article on Countrywide
A few weeks ago, the former sales representative priced a $275,000 loan with a 30-year term and a fixed rate for a borrower putting down 10 percent, with fully documented income, and a credit score of 620. While a F.H.A. loan on the same terms would have carried a 7 percent rate and 0.125 percentage points, Countrywide’s subprime loan for the same borrower carried a rate of 9.875 percent and three additional percentage points.
The monthly payment on the F.H.A. loan would have been $1,829, while Countrywide’s subprime loan generated a $2,387 monthly payment. That amounts to a difference of $558 a month, or $6,696 a year — no small sum for a low-income homeowner.
Since when does a low income homebuyer buy a house for over 290k?
It’s the New York Times - to them, anyone buying a place costing less than a few million is one of the “little people.”
This is a very damning article. With these kind of business practices, CFC will have a lot of fingers pointed at it and lose a lot of good will with its customers and, more imortantly, creditors. On top of all of CFC’s other problems, this taint of scandal could be the straw that broke the proverbial camel’s back.
But if BOA snaps up CFC, won’t it all be good once again?
I am rendered speechless — yet again!
Rarely a buyer of Countrywide shares — he has not bought a share since 1987, according to Securities and Exchange Commission filings — he has been a huge seller in recent years. Since the company listed its shares on the New York Stock Exchange in 1984, he has reaped $406 million selling Countrywide stock.
As the subprime mortgage debacle began to unfold this year, Mr. Mozilo’s selling accelerated. Filings show that he made $129 million from stock sales during the last 12 months, or almost one-third of the entire amount he has reaped over the last 23 years. He still holds 1.4 million shares in Countrywide, a 0.24 percent stake that is worth $29.4 million.
If this isn’t insider trading, what is??
hi. long time lurker, first time poster. while countrywide may have been heavy-handed or even unethical, since when do businesses have to tell you what their markup is? is there some constitutional right to get the lowest possible price?
As Usual, It All Comes Down to Where
By Elizabeth Razzi - Washington Post
Sunday, August 26, 2007; Page F01
http://tinyurl.com/33yrz2
You’ve got to admire their guts, at least. And in the end, you might marvel at their timing.
On Aug. 16, the same day financial markets across much of the world were coming unglued, Erin Fuller and her husband, Michael Leurdijk, listed for sale their three-bedroom bungalow on N. Edgewood Street in Arlington.
This little house rivals Tai Shan for cuteness, and it’s in a popular neighborhood, Lyon Park, near Metro. But with an asking price of $899,000, a buyer would probably need a loan well above the jumbo threshold of $417,000. And jumbos are among the loans being shunned by mortgage-bond investors, who lately have been too frightened to invest in anything unless Uncle Sam agrees to read them a bedtime story and place their cash under his mattress. Have these homeowners lost their senses?
This part of the article really cracked me up…
“We’re returning to the lending style of the olden days — before the late ’90s at least — when borrowers had to actually convince a lender that they were able and willing to pay back a couple of hundred thousand dollars, profitably, over two or three decades. Be prepared to make at least a 5 percent down payment . . . . You’ll need a FICO credit score of 680 now.”
Oh yeah, those are really tight lending standards.
“One quick way to shore up your score is to rein in credit card balances . . . . Connelly recommends keeping the outstanding balance on each credit card account to less than half of the credit line available to you.”
That’s what they regard as reining in balances? Ahahahaha!
probably need a loan above the jombo threshold? arrrgh!!!
tick tock…. like watching paint dry. i want more action - and soon!
Probably the new scam will be two $417k loans so you can buy and $834k house. Anyone want to bet this will be tried?
“two $417k loans” = Jumbo-the-elephant-back loans
“The recovery has arrived for the District and close-in suburbs. ”
Oh really? Elizabeth Razzi, the author of this biased piece, lives in Northern Virginia and is a veteran of two major home remodelings. I wonder if she has any money on this wave, that may have influenced her writing in the Washington Post that led her to the conclusion that we are in a recovery?
http://www.rightonthemoney.org/experts/razzi.html
veteran of two major home remodelings
“We gather here today in honor of these brave souls, who have given so much of themselves so that our nation may remain free of popcorn ceilings and tiny-feeling kitchens…”
I think its funny that perma-bull Elizabeth Razzi has declared the housing bust over and done when in truth we are just at the beginning stages of the bust. I literally burst out laughing when I read her quote “The recovery has arrived for the District and close-in suburbs.” Ms. Razzi obviously doesn’t understand how busts work - they start in outlying, less desirable areas and slowly work their way to the center of the region. The fact that we had one month of increased prices and volume is an aberation, not a sign of good times ahead.
I’m one of the 45 people who toured that Edgewood Street house. I’m a neighbor and I’d guess that 2/3’s of the people who toured the house that day were neighbors also. So, unlike the article’s suggestion, I don’t think there are throngs of buyers out on the hunt for overpriced houses these days. People have gotten smart and realize that houses, including the subject property, are seriously overpriced.
This house is listed as a 3 bedroom, but the downstairs bedroom doesn’t have a closet, so technically it’s a 2 bedroom. The house is decent overall. The kitchen and baths have been nicely updated in recent years. The yard is quite small and there is no driveway or off street parking, which is a bummer. In addition, there is no basement for storage space. Some of the rooms are dark.
I’d guess the proper price for this house is about $675,000 based on current comps and it’s true non-bubble value is about $450,000.
The proof will be in the pudding - we’ll see how much it sells for.
And I don’t think the owners “chose” to list it for sale, I think they “had” to list it for sale (as they are already on the hook for another, even more expensive property). Two alligators chomping at their wallet each and every month.
I think its funny that perma-bull Elizabeth Razzi has declared the housing bust over and done when in truth we are just at the beginning stages of the bust.
But..but..Elizabeth is a real estate expert. It said so in the article.
A question not being asked is “why should the Midwest and less expensive areas of the country agree to any bailout that will only allow the coasts to live their overbloated lifestyle?”
Expansion of Fannie and Freddie and the jumbo limit above $417,000 can only be done on the backs of citizens from Arkansas, Nebraska, Iowa, North Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee, Alabama, etc. The so-called leaders of those states should be yelling “hell no” at any raising of the limits that continues to allow Florida, California, New Jersey, etc. to overinflate their ridiculous home prices at the expense of others.
The system is broken.
“Why should the Midwest and less expensive areas of the country agree to any bailout?”
Excellent question. Midwest folks need to speak up and let their congressperson know they don’t support a federal government bailout.
Because a lot of people in the Midwest are in just as much trouble as the coasts, only the numbers are smaller. Most foreclosure notices in the area of Detroit I research are under 100K. But this area votes for the likes of the bailout proponents, and here in Michigan, I think folks will take any help they can get, regardless of the longer term consequences.
How would increasing the GSE limits above $417,000 help Detroit? How many homes in Detroit sell for anywhere near $417,000? I think you need to dust off that Econ 101 textbook.
The larger question is whether anyone stupid enough to buy real estate in Detroit or any other declining city deserves a bailout of any kind. I’m surprised that any bank will even issue a mortgage for what will inevitably be a depreciating “asset.”
You missed my point, Professor. Raising limits won’t do a thing here. My point is that people here vote for the likes of those who would propose a bailout, even if the “benefit” here would be less here than on the coasts.
This, IMO, is a wedge issue which could help the R-cans keep their hold on the WH, if they catch on and make political hay over it.
I have a friend I share my blog info with. She recently put her home on the market with a noticably low price that has prompted several offers. One offer is full price but has a contingency of a sale completion (fund transfer) from a their home already under contract. That sale will not be completed until Oct 31st. There are several other offers on the home from people w/no contingency although offers are not as high. (Her realtor mentioned cash sales sometimes have their issues too.)
When she asked what I thought, I told her I’d ask people here. I thought a while ago there was some discussion that it might be smarter to take a lower price if it meant bypassing a contingency even if it was already under contract.
Also, how certain are people that things will escalate/get nastier before the end of October? Should she avoid dragging this out thru Oct at all costs?
I do believe I have her talked into renting once this sale is completed.
The biggest financial meltdowns seem to occur in October, every 50 years or so. Otherwise, October is a great month for steady income earnings and stock prices! Helpful?
Isn’t October when the major wave of mortgage re-sets starts, per the Credit Suisse chart? About how long after the re-set (assuming the majority with re-setting rates can’t even make the first payment) does it take for the foreclosure process to toss the FB?
Peak runs Oct-holidays, then add 3-6 months for default and foreclosure. Of course, that tracks the cnsumption recession; the lenders, investing companies will try to get this over and done with ASAP if they can, so that could tip the Dow into falling through March lows as early as next week, week after that, and then we’d fall back to summer of 2006 levels, i.e. they would kick off the recession, not the decline in consumption following the ARM debacle.
So then June of ‘08 oughta be a real laugh-a-minute.
I’m cashed out and renting. I’m gonna be pretty happy. BTW, yes, the flooding was Biblical, added a long comment re: Chicago NW exurbs all the way to Iowa. Maybe it will show up. Last time I reposted they both eventually showed up, so not reposting.
I’m watching for your comment, Time, hasn’t shown up yet, but it will eventually. The footage of the flooding I saw on TV was shocking, you just don’t expect that sort of thing in the Midwest, and the rain just kept on. Wonder how this will affect real estate. After Katrina, nearby areas that hadn’t been affected as much had a bit of a boom in sales. People were looking for shelter and places to re-locate their businesses.
I keep thinking people will start backing away from the whole waterfront thing. I always told the kids I’d love waterfront for retirement, but people live forever in my gene pool, and I don’t want to be 80 or 90 years old, flooded out and on hold to my insurance company until my last day on Earth trying to settle a claim.
I kind of think around the Chicago NW exurbs, little networks of post-glacier lakes and the terminal moraine deposits, they won’t get it. It’s hard to look at hurricanes, wildfires, the drama in Florida and California, and understand that your biggest asset can be in jeopardy in Illinois, especially as the landforms that produce waterfront are just far enough from the city to be temptingly well priced.
People will not avoid waterfront as long as FEMA continues to subsidize their reckless choices.
What’s their max, 200K, 250K? The bubble may have put an end to that scam. The kind of people with waterfront money have figured that out. We need new fools.
Supplementary flood/earthquake insurance is very expensive, but well worth it if one lives in a high-risk area. We moved out of a flood zone because I didn’t want the worry for the next 30 years.
Depends on the state. In some states it can be only a matter of months in other state can take over a year. The smarter FB’s will see the writing on the wall and just want to end the pain, the dumber ones will try to hang on and continue throwing good money after bad. I think foreclosure’s will be heavy for a good couple years. Lenders will continue taking losses and continue tightening credit . I don’t we’ll see the market stabilize until the foreclosures get worked though and prices make some sense relative to incomes. Until prices are affordable foreclosures will continue.
Here is a rumor from another web-site that is interesting.
“I heard something interesting yesterday that I wanted to share with the Forum before it becomes news.
I’m part owner of a website that advertises land and lots for sale, so I know people in related businesses. A big time local motgage broker has a lot of friends in the mortgage business on Wall Street. They told him that the mortgage bankers are holding one half trillion dollars of mortgages that they can not find any buyers for right now. That means that they won’t be able to write any new mortgages until they unload their inventory. I was told that there are already banks that have stopped taking mortgage loan applications.
No loan applications = no home sales.
I wonder how the markets will respond to that?”
auger-inn,
This is true for the funny money loans. Sub-prime, Alt-A, no doc, no asset, etc. is all dead in the water. That is why all the brokers imploded. They have no one to whom they can originate.
The only lenders active are portfolio lenders holding the loans on their balance sheets. Wells Fargo…..and they bumped jumbo to 8% for brokered, though it is 7.125% if you go to a branch (where they can verify who you are).
That is why the fed had to pump $50 billion in liquidity a week ago. They took lend it to the banks, so the banks could lend it to the MBS pool holders that could not sell the MBS pools to investors. The investors are angry and not buying the junk anymore.
Wells Fargo…..and they bumped jumbo to 8% for brokered, though it is 7.125% if you go to a branch (where they can verify who you are).
So much for the old canard that a mortgage broker can get you a better loan than you can find yourself!
I bet that this is true - How many all Wall Street have already been burned by cdo’s? How many are scared that their cdo’s will get marked down and be sold at much lower prices? How many have shied away from buying mortgages? I bet everyone on Wall Street has.
“The biggest financial meltdowns seem to occur in October, every 50 years or so.”
Which suggests the PPT will be on high alert. What makes you think they will fail to prop up the bid distribution?
take whatever she can get without any strings or contingencies.
take whatever she can get NOW without any strings or contingencies.
If she has a strong cash buyer, I’d get em signed up, get the movers in and closed so fast the buyers heads would be spinning. Tell to grab the money and run like she stole it.
I helped my mother sell her house in 2005. We had a cash buyer that was a little lower than another buyer that had to sell their house. We took the cash buyer, and that was in 2005, when the market was strong. It wasn’t worth the risk, aggravation or time, worrying about the other buyer.
My wife (former realtor) and I both agree with vmaxer.
I’m trying to sell a house right now as well (Mom’s house). Our realtor told me today about a buyer (”investor”) who would buy the house cash, but wanted to know the lowest price. She basically told him to F*-off. I told her to call them back and see what their best offer would be. If they’re willing to close fast (2-3 weeks), I’d be *very* interested in working with them.
In the meantime, there have been a number of unqualified buyers who have shown interest at closer to list price. Needless to say, the cash offer is the one I care most about right now.
Good luck with your friend!
Once I had such an offer and the potential buyer wanted out. So, they held out until the last day and we lost out on all of the other potential buyers. Then the Holidays and winter set in.
Yes, a few thousand less in the pocket is better than waiting unless she’s sure they absolutely have to have her house.
I’d say “Take the ready money and run”.
Take cash buyer with min.10% deposit held in her attorney’s escrow.
IMHO . If she has a contract offer at full price ,to close in about 60 days from a buyer who has a sale not subject to a house selling ,and her agent has determined that the buyer can qualify at new lending terms ,go for it .I think I would want to find out how solid that sale is that is due to close in Oct and what the terms are ,(ask for a copy of the escrow instructions on that other sale ).
Why, in this environment, would anybody even think of waiting if they don’t have to? With things deteriorating so quickly, the time between now and Halloween is an eternity.
Here risk/reward is skewed heavily towards risk if she waits until the Jack-o-lanterns are glowing. I would take less and get the heck out now. There is no question in my mind.
No one knows how log the Fed can keep up the mirage of liquid markets. If it were my money, I’d definitely take the cash and run. Forget the extra shekels and grab the sure thing. This isn’t the 10 minutes in history to bet that all will be well.
I used to be a realtor and lower price or not, cash sales should be your first choice. That other buyer with the contingency could have 5 other contingencies beneath theirs. Anything could go wrong. Cash buyers can back out too, but it’s still a little less risky. Also by Oct prices could fall and that buyer could back out anyway, or they could lose their job. Better to take what’s in front of you in the here and now. That realtor is only looking at her larger commission and maybe she’s tied to the other sale also.
One other thing, cash sales usually close in 2 weeks.
Thank you everyone for your generous input. It seems the buyer of the other home is a European w/a large collection of homes all over the continent. Origionally the purchase was supposed to be cash but I’m not sure why it went to a mortgage situation.
Other offer on friend’s home requires bank financing but w/ no contingency.
Maybe your friend can ask to see the buyer’s contract. That way she can see where the possible risks are. For instance, if their buyer has a contingency for getting their financing or selling their house, then your friend may consider taking a lower offer.
CarrieAnn: How nice that you have a friend who values your advice. Tell her that she should accept the offer with the highest down payment from buyers with excellent credit and good jobs. If she can pull off a sale before the fall, she will have dodged a bullet. She will thank you next spring.
Ahhh, Omaha, my hometown, so much different than South Flowierda:
http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2798&u_sid=10116628
Has anyone here been affected by the Midwest flooding I keep hearing about on the news? It looks pretty bad, but of course, the news likes to blow this sort of thing up. Just wondering what it is like on the ground, because it reminds me of Florida after the hurricanes.
It seems to have been pretty bad. Flew into O’Hare from SFO Friday night after a delayed departure and when we taxied to the gate there were a lot of planes just leaving. The departure lounges were full, 4-hour delays. I worked in travel for 20 years. Something looked really wrong to me. It should have been winding down at that late hour. Said to the son–my ride–Gee, when I called A___ to tell her we were delayed she said you’d had some bad weather. O’Hare looks like the End of Days and everybody decided they wanted to be with family. He says Oh, she always understates everything except bugs, then it’s “There’s a great BIG spider in here.” A lot of trees down in the NW exurbs, rumor of a tornado touchdown in Aurora, SW. His wife later told me there were so many trees down along the Fox River in West Dundee they closed the street; if you drove around one you just came to another one that fell down the other way. Drove back to Iowa–doing the caucuses–and my shortcut through DeKalb to the Interstate turned into an hour; flooded-out streets, traffice jams. Sitting on Lincoln Highway by NIU, noticing a lot of water coming down the drive of one of the houses there, thinking they were washing their car, then the next house, thinking they were washing their car too, how odd, then–doh! They were pumping out their basements. Stopped at Dixon–the dog likes Lowell Park–and the Rock River was completely out of its banks, up to the top of the bridge supports in town. Mississippi was not terrible at I-80, just quite high. All the other rivers looked over their banks. Kind of funny to see, after coming from a wildfire in Sonora, firetrucks lining the playhouse parking lot, chuck wagon and all, when we got there for a performance Thursday night. They had closed the little mining town in the park and were watching the wind so they could evacuate the theater if it shifted. A lot of dead trees around there, severe drought.
Findley OH had severe to total loss of 700 homes and their main downtown streets were still part way underwater a couple of days later because their river was so high.
Northern Cook county got hit a bit hard. A co-worker in Mount Prospect had his basement flooded after the heavy rains blew out a basement window. Quite a mess for him, ouch! Ended up bailing water with the juice out (did have a battery powered pump & it helped). In the end not too much damage & they did manage to restore the power ~ 8 hours later. There were lots of trees down, flooded roads, stalled cars & tons of other problems. The strange thing was the beast missed us in Lake county (~ 15 miles north). The mess has been mostly cleaned up, and the forecast is for sunny skies for the rest of the week
future desireable property: somewhat inland and at least 100 ft above sea level!
At least 200 miles inland and at least 50 feet of elevation above the nearest stream, river or lake.
Flood insurance? We don’t need no stinkin’ flood insurance.
Though, remember, that the interior of continental USA has often been an inland sea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Interior_Seaway
Speedy, thanks. I just learned something.
ot - no photos since mid july? nobody has any goodies to show?
I sent a nice photo of a home builder using the construction water truck to spray the lawns of all the foreclosed houses in his subdivision. You know, the ones right next to the builders for-sale inventory. Why…….why, it is hard to see that 14 houses are bank owned, abandoned with no utilities turned on. Why, why…..they look just like regular houses……right next to the builders for sale inventory……
It is so nice of the builder to keep up the neighborhood like that.
Ben never posted the photo, so I sent it in to this site:
http://tinyurl.com/yrhjqs
Got Water?
What a ghost town.
good one! that is pathetic!
I just took a long morning walk through a deed restricted community in Belleair, FL…
Many overgrown lots, several incomplete homes with FSBO or Assist-2-Sell, one mosquito breeding ground pool, a stretch where there were 4 homes for sale on one side and 3 on the other.
Thankfully the wealthy remain unaffected.
I think my parents finally are starting to get it. When I talked to them yesterday, they specifically asked me what the “people on your blog” are saying. Now, let me specify, that when I first started to talk about what I had learned here, my mother wanted me to go get a prescription for anti-depressants. I think the seize up in the credit market was the turn around. I had already told them that credit standards had to rise.
Now, my parents are hardly J6P when it comes to financial matters, and my mother is very conservative with expenses (my dad would like a lot more toys, but he defers to her). They listen to/read Bob Brinker for a lot of investing strategy. I told them that his technical analysis can’t include the fraud in the market from the last few years, but he saved them from losing their shirts in the tech crash, so they are sticking with him. I did warn them that 3rd quarter earnings reports may be a disappointment. My brother is also sticking with Brinker. As far as he is concerned, P/E ratios don’t look out of whack so there is nothing to worry about. Then again, his wife owned a Manhattan co-op outright when they married, so a market crash won’t hurt them in the here and now.
I know some Bob Brinker fans. I object to market timing, which is what Brinker is into. Once I looked up on google for some critical opinions of Brinker. There was an issue of QQQ (or is it QQQQ?) where Brinker advised to hold onto it after the 2000 crash. A lot of people lost money. Brinker censors anyone to this day who brings it up.
My friends do say that I am following Brinker’s advice to some degree by buying up Series I savings bonds and being into Vanguard stock index funds. But I tell them I do not time the market. I’m now getting into TIPS, by the way. Although they don’t immunize me from the AMT, I have far more Series I bonds than TIPS. But the ten year TIPS have a higher fixed rate than series I.
Your brother may be right about the P/E ratios. The P/E of the S & P 500 is not out of whack. People here are in denial of the fact that many stocks and indices are still well below their values in the year 2000.
Umm…4th quarter earnings reports may be a disappointment. Scratch that…First quarter earnings in 2008 may be a disappointment. Scratch that…Second quarter…See what I’m saying? Lots of pundits here predicted a severe stock collapse soon. 15 months ago someone on HBB said he pulled out all the money from stocks and put it in cash. OUCH!
there is a 34 year cycle of rising and falling PE’s. the last one topped out at a 44 PE of the SP500 in 2000. a 17 PE ratio is average, but we have had it on the way up and down. the lowest PE has been around 7 and we might actually see it.
mutual fund cash positions are at around 2%, the lowest in many many decades if not the lowest ever. not much cash on the sidelines to keep on buying
Exactly. Recent down legs of the cycle include
1901-1921
1929-1945
1966-1982
2000-????
What use are PE ratios when every company is buying back stock?
For bubble market valuations, they are an indication of how far along the prices are in the mean reversion process.
Full disclosure - I had to explain to my brother what a mutual fund was when he was just a few weeks shy of his 25th birthday. He had no idea except that it had something to do with stocks. He’s a smart guy in other things, but a financial whiz he is not.
He might not be a financial wiz, but he sounds like he could be a financial whiz. (sorry, couldn’t resist)
You know, Bill, pulling out before a once a decade or two crash isn’t really serious market timing. In general, Brinker is entirely a dollar cost average kind of guy in the broadest possible market index funds.
Just because someone doesn’t do exactly what you do, doesn’t make him the enemy.
A lot of people in Florida in 2006 were saying, “you can’t time the market”. Oops!
I pulled a lot out of stocks and put it into 5.25% CDs and stable funds last year. When the market dropped 10% a few weeks ago I didn’t blink an eye. The people around me were pissing in their pants. Now that’s a great investment.
I didn’t buy in New York in 2005 when everybody was telling me to buy. And my financial situation has never been better. All you need to do is time one crash and your fortunes may be better than you ever thought possible. Keep on holding, Bill. It is your religion, after all.
CityBoy — I timed the housing market twice and won twice. I expect to do better this time, as the correction necessary to realign home prices with incomes and rents is far bigger. Those who say market timing is a losing strategy either don’t know what they are talking about, or else are the bagholder on an investment they would like to unload.
Come on guys, don’t be so mean to BiP. Being a dollar-cost-averager doesn’t make you a mass murderer, after all.
True. In a world fraught with obscene violence, BiP is a much better alternative.
I agree with Professor Bear about timing housing purchases. That’s pretty easy, although you’d never guess it from the behavior of the last five years. The stock market is hard, though. I agree with Bill in principle, but I’m in my early 50’s now and can’t afford a big crash, so I switched our retirement money to fixed income in March of this year. I got some nice stock bargains back in 2002 that I’m holding onto, and hope to get some more bargains if the Dow falls this fall/winter.
many stocks and indices are still well below their values in the year 2000
That’s comforting.
15 months ago someone on HBB said he pulled out all the money from stocks and put it in cash. OUCH!
You say you don’t time the market, yet you are judging that person based on only a 15 month time window.
Don’t you love it when your parents admit you’re right? Especially when your brother is wrong!!!
It isn’t quite that good. They are just getting slightly interested in hearing a different perspective. I’ll take what I can get. My mother whining at me to start checking out neighborhoods “just for the information” is a lot better than my mother whining at me to get on mind altering drugs.
Washington Post article on a stripper turned multi-million dollar mortgage fraudster:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/25/AR2007082501362.html?hpid=moreheadlines
With her long hair and shapely figure, Jackson was one of his most popular dancers, earning well over $1,500 a week in tips, said Schwapp, who owns the Legend Nightclub. He said Jackson danced under the name “Night Rider” from 1997 to 2003. One of her most memorable stunts involved riding in on a white stallion, a la Lady Godiva.
“She was very popular, very creative,” he said. “She stood out.”
Jackson eventually stopped dancing to focus on her career as a loan officer, moving from one mortgage firm to another. In September 2004, she teamed with McCall, 46, to open Metropolitan. They advertised on gospel and R&B radio stations and other African American media outlets, promising to help homeowners with cash-flow and credit problems.
Investigators say Jackson and McCall ran a sophisticated foreclosure rescue operation that included family and friends, many of whom Jackson taught the ins and outs of the real estate industry.
Essentially, the company would enlist investors with strong credit as “straw buyers” who would take ownership of the houses. The original homeowners could live rent-free for a year and then buy back their homes at the end of the year.
But when the homes passed to the straw buyer, Metropolitan would borrow as much as possible against the value, effectively siphoning out the equity and increasing the cost of the house, according to the suit. The original owners were often unable to repurchase their property; some said they were unaware they were signing over their deeds.
Last month, a class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of homeowners who say they have collectively lost as much as $60 million in home equity through her business.
“Joy Jackson concocted a scheme to defraud people,” said Phillip Robinson, an attorney who filed the federal suit against Jackson, Fordham and 12 other defendants. “The sole motive seemed to be to enrich her lavish lifestyle. She took from people who were cash poor but were equity rich.”
And the hits just keep on coming. We’ve had at least one similar story (although it didn’t involve a stripper, that’s a nice touch) here in the Tampa Bay area. I wish there were some way, when all is said and told, to know how many people in the US ran schemes like this.
Sacramento just had a front page headline about a similar scam. The easy money bubble factors really bring out a lot of winners….
“But when the homes passed to the straw buyer, Metropolitan would borrow as much as possible against the value, effectively siphoning out the equity and increasing the cost of the house, according to the suit.”
From stripping off clothing to stripping out equity — that seems like a fairly natural career transition. Maybe her next career move should be over to Wall Street, as she seems to have an intuitive grasp for the corporate raider concept.
“She took from people who were cash poor but were equity rich.”
More evidence there that Joy is well-suited to working on Wall Street.
“She took from people who were cash poor but were equity rich.”
Didn’t Countrywide do the same thing when it came to refi’s?
Mozillo would really show up riding out on a white stallion.
PB, her next gig with be dancing for the guards in her secure, gated community. Of course she will have more free housing…courtesy of the feds….
A new variation of “tit for tat”..
“Last month, the (their) house went into foreclosure.”
Justice is swift!
What about their son riding in a limo to school. Idiots!
I’ll bet they spent every last dime….. and their “home” is not even in their names
Plus I seriously doubt they would have thought to keep a mill or two in gold coins for their escape.
LOL, yep. Liars always think they’re smarter than everyone else. As if stealing is some clever trick that others just can’t figure out. The next decade is gonna kick arse, watching these cheaters fry.
Smells of fish in Murrieta: (North County Times
“MURRIETA —- A group of more than 60 upscale tract houses purchased last year with 100 percent financing is falling one by one into foreclosure, leaving lawns brown, neighbors peeved, and a handful of renters answering late-night knocks at the door. ..”
http://tinyurl.com/24pt6k
Ochoa suddenly closed down the Solco branch in early June…Ochoa suddenly cancelled his listings for 24 of the houses, which he had been trying to sell.
But, but,…he already found a new line of work. Look…
Ochoa started this month as an agent with a Temecula-based real estate brokerage that specializes in selling bank-owned properties, including several in the same neighborhoods where he once operated.
Man, he didn’t even feel it was necessary to get the Heck-outta-Dodge.
Now you know why all the MBS paper with 92% tranches rated AAA is hardly worth 50% of face value. $450,000 houses financed at $650,000! If the lenders foreclose, they will be lucky to clear $350,000 after holding and selling costs. Pass what is left over to your pension fund who bought the paper in 2006 and WHAMO….$598,000 turns into $350,000. A 41% loss of capital over a 2 or 3 years period, not to mention the promised loan payments of 6%/yr or $108,000 that the fund will never see.
Am off to explore the Sarasota market for a few days. Too bad I’ve missed the auctions, but should be interesting nonetheless.
Don’t worry, Chip, there will be plenty more auctions. There are some good pickings in the Sarasota area right now and it will only get better.
Palmetto, got any MLS numbers or craigslist links for us to look at?
Flew this weekend, aircraft was about 90% full going out, 40% coming back. Has anyone else flown recently?
SFO to O’Hare Friday. Posted on the storms, but it hasn’t shown up yet. Delayed departure, death of a thousand cuts, 20-minute increments. Arrival at 9 p.m. many planes leaving gates, departure lounges full, very unusual–worked in travel for 20 years; 9 p.m. does not look like that. Chicago had 4-hour delays. Rivers over their banks all the way out to Iowa, here just for the caucuses, but the Mississippi not too bad. Airlines get slammed by fuel costs, ergo they’ve been really pushing their load factors by attrition, not replacing retired equipment. I had stopped traveling for quite a while, was shocked and disgusted by the whole experience, geeze, it’s …it’s disgusting, truly 3rd world. Used to just be uncomfortable. It’ll be kind of nice when the recession thins things out, except it’ll be hard to find a carrier with a healthy balance sheet, and that goes to maintenance, shaving standards and reporting.
Did you see the WSJ article this past week about how the number of Amtrak passengers has been increasing? And it ain’t just because it’s cheaper than flying.
It’s clearly a nicer environment, but the schedule is not realistic for most travelers. In some regards it’s a big slow landbound plane, it rarely departs or arrives anywhere near what’s ideal for you, and the meals and sleeper cars add up. If you have the time, it’s part of your destination, not mere transportation.
These times are all about the hurry to get from A to B. The matters of a humane level of comfort fall far down the list of priorities.
My late wife and I traveled regularly on Amtrak (we always reserved a sleeper compartment ahead of time on long routes). If you have the time for train travel, it’s a nice change of pace from the soul-sucking experience of hectic airports, “you’re a suspect” screening methods, the inhaling of jet fuel fumes sitting on a tarmac, the getting jammed even tighter into your (already tight) alloted space, the futile attempt at trying to zone-out the numerous noises and discomforts of the whole “flu tube” experience these days. Too bad most are always rushing to get somewhere as soon as possible (much has been written about enjoying the “getting there” as much as the “being there” of travel), because commercial air travel is hell these days if you can’t afford first class seating (and few of us can). I’ve heard the transportation industry people on public radio and other media espousing their PR responses from callers about how to make air travel less arduous. One can only laugh at their replies. Being miserable in travel has become the accepted norm these days - the public knows that they’re getting the squeeze (literally), knows to pack snacks cause they’ll only s-e-l-l you a meal these days (unless you think the proffered pretzels and sugar-water are nutritious foods in a high-stress, crowded, dirty environment.
Flew for a week to Charlotte via Phoenix and back via LV. All flights were at 100% capacity. While waiting to board in Charlotte for return flight home they announced that they needed two people to give up their seats on a Dallas bound flight for free tickets. Air travel is cheap, ticket to Charlotte $259 plus taxes for round trip. My wife leaves next week for Hawaii and round trip ticket is $400 to the big island (Kona).
Yes all the time. Flights 100% full 100% of the time and late 100%.
I fly from Tucson to LV for fairly regularly on business. Flight attentants announce almost always “we have a full flight today so….”. There are no shortage of people going ot and from LV fom Tucson. On weekends it is hard or impossible to book a day in advance on Southwest and htey run about 7 flights a day each way.
desertfox
No haven’t flown recently, but once again went to a half full restaurant. This place always has people lined up out the door on Fridays. We walked right in, got seated and the dining room was half full. This is the 2nd time this has happened to us in the last month. We were the only ones in the dining room in the other one. It also always had a 45-60 min wait at dinner time.
NOW they tell us these payment option ARMs can adjust to budget-breaking levels! I think it was over a year ago I read an article in the WSJ detailing how option ARM payments could easily double under fairly mild assumptions about reset interest rates.
I am wondering if the disclosure forms discuss how falling home prices increase the risk of losing a home when the buyer makes a low (or no) downpayment and starts with an artificially low initial payment relative to the long-term cost of amortizing the debt?
New disclosure forms are published by U.S.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
August 26, 2007
WASHINGTON – Federal bank regulators published a new set of forms designed to give borrowers a better understanding of mortgages that can adjust to dramatically higher monthly payments.
With mortgage defaults rising among U.S. borrowers, consumer advocates say many lenders encouraged consumers to focus on the initial low-rate “teaser” period without fully informing them that their loan payments could jump up in the future.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20070826/news_1h26forms.html
New HBB terminology: Teaser rate = “Taser rate”.
Or should the reset rate be referred to as “taser rate,” as FBs are often stunned by how high those monthly payments can go?
I concede the point to you, good Professor. A “Taser Rate” follows the teaser rate.
It stunningly shocking , how many people think a 2% increase in interest rates means a 2% increase in their monthly mortgage payment.
I have to question the Economist writers’ knee-jerk conclusion that “stockmarkets have been reassured by all this” (referring to CB manipulations to prop up asset prices). How can they rule out the black swan of a CB’s willingness to directly purchase stock in order to create the false impression that investers have been reassured?
Markets and the economy
Paper losses
Aug 23rd 2007 | LONDON AND NEW YORK
From The Economist print edition
Central banks struggle to restore calm without breeding complacency
Reuters
FOR those who stop short of stuffing their mattress with banknotes, money-market funds are meant to be the next best thing. They invest their clients’ money in supposedly safe and liquid short-term instruments. But as America’s mortgage malaise has spread with shocking alacrity from one corner of the credit markets to another, even these staid creatures have been sent into spasms. This week they took centre stage, dumping potentially toxic securities and fleeing for the safety of government bills.
Though the markets had calmed down a little by August 22nd, central bankers cannot afford to be complacent. They have pumped large amounts of liquidity into the system over the past fortnight, and continued to do so this week. The Federal Reserve has cut the discount rate—the charge it makes for emergency lending to banks—from 6.25% to 5.75%, and lengthened the term of these loans to 30 days. It has also urged banks not to be shy in coming forward. To show there is no shame in turning to the Fed, four big banks—Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Wachovia and Bank of America—all this week announced they had taken the central bank up on its forceful offer.
Will this be enough? In a statement, the Fed’s rate-setting committee left the markets in little doubt that it would cut its main policy rate if their ongoing ructions hurt spending and jobs. And Ben Bernanke, the Fed’s chairman, was quoted by the head of the Senate Banking Committee as saying that he would use “all tools available” to quell the crisis. Elsewhere, Japan’s central bank put off a rate rise it had long been itching to implement; and, despite hints to the contrary, the European Central Bank could still find itself in the same position when it meets on September 6th.
Stockmarkets have been reassured by all this.
http://economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9687709
You have to think, given how light the volume is in August, anyone who reads a chart can see how little effort it takes the big money to boost stocks. We’re being set up. If you’re left holding the bag while these guys slip out the back, it’s your own fault.
You just slip out the back, Jack
Make a new plan, Stan
You don’t need to be coy, Roy
Just get yourself free
Hop on the bus, Gus
You don’t need to discuss much
Just drop off the key, Lee
And get yourself free
BWA HA HA! That was our road trip music a few trips ago.
Just drop off the key, Lee
And get yourself free
And that will be the new line everyone’s singing.
50 ways to leave your mortgage
Could not agree more. I’ve been campaigning for my brother to take a sideways step into treasuries for the time being, as this happy-happy joy-joy business will not survive long.
The Economist questions the wisdom of running an economy by injecting streroids at the first sign of a soft patch:
Economics focus
Does America need a recession?
Aug 23rd 2007
From The Economist print edition
An intriguing, if unpopular, thought
THE late Rudi Dornbusch, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, once remarked: “None of the post-war expansions died of old age. They were all murdered by the Fed.” Every recession since 1945, with the exception of the one in 2001, was preceded by a sharp rise in inflation that forced the central bank to raise interest rates. But today’s Federal Reserve is no serial killer. It seems keener on blood transfusions than on bloodletting.
…
A necessary evil
But should a central bank always try to avoid recessions? Some economists argue that this could create a much wider form of moral hazard. If long periods of uninterrupted expansions lead people to believe that the Fed can prevent any future recession, consumers, firms, investors and borrowers will be encouraged to take bigger risks, borrowing more and saving less. During the past quarter century the American economy has been in recession for only 5% of the time, compared with 22% of the previous 25 years. Partly this is due to welcome structural changes that have made the economy more stable. But what if it is due to repeated injections of adrenaline every time the economy slows?
http://economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9687245
NICE POST BEAR……..
One of my subordinates at work has a ARM on his 2 year old house. He proceeded to tell me his payment is increasing from $1900/month. to $2600/mo. Does this adjustment upward sound plausible? Oh, and he’s also having trouble making that $400 payment on the GMC Denali. On a side note, loaned him $200 about 6 weeks ago, now he avoids me at the office (lol). Whenever I feel bad about my $800 modest rental and my inexpensive $10K Subaru I just think of this guy.
Such a jump is easily within the realm of possibility. He could have been paying interest-only up to now, or had a really low teaser rate. Now the “taser rate” (love it!) is kicking in and he is indeed stunned.
Will he be in “Denial” when the “Denali” gets towed away?
hehe…..Bill made a funny and I like it!
Actually, to me, that increase seems to be on the low side - but it’s just the first. He may want to review his note and see just how high it may go. If it happens to be an Option ARM, and he’s paying the minimum, look for tripling of that payment, when the resets are through ratcheting up.
From today’s NYT business section about Countrywide business practices - ““In terms of being unresponsive to what was happening, to sticking it out the longest, and continuing to justify the garbage they were selling, Countrywide was the worst lender,” said Ira Rheingold, executive director of the National Association of Consumer Advocates. “And anytime states tried to pass responsible lending laws, Countrywide was fighting it tooth and nail.” Any surprises here?
I’m not surprised. In the last 10 years any houses in our neighborhood that have been foreclosed on were financed or heloc’d thru Countrywide. Our neighbors up the street had borrowed 110% of the value thru them. Yep, they’re gone too. Foreclosed on about 3 years ago.
Our loan is serviced by Countrywide. They are constantly soliciting us by phone and email to take out a HELOC. Yeah, right.
I have been watching house prices in the south shore of MA.
Interesting info on a house on 28 Moulton Ave, Weymouth, Zip 02191:
First listed on 12/20/2005. Weymouth, 28 Moulton Ave, List Number: 70305852 List Price: $209000, 2 bedrooms and 1 bath, Single Family, Living Area: 1222 Square Feet
Zillow.com: Sale History 02/24/2006: $185,000
The buyer apparently puts in a second bath, does some cosmetics, and goes hunting for a greater fool.
06/03/2007, List Number: 70590139 List Price: $369000
How greedy does this fellow get, that too in June of this year - didn’t the Joshua tree treatment commence in earnest this year???
07/04/2007: List Number: 70590139 List Price: $355000
08/05/2007: List Number: 70590139 List Price: $339999
08/26/2007: List Number: 70590139 List Price: $319,999
I am sure the seller is thinking he “lost” equity for 50K between 06/03 and 08/26. He has this to say in his recent listing.
“Priced for quick sale! Best House on Moulton Ave! Everything brand new. Great starter home. Dead End w/Fenced in yard. Close to everything walk to beach. Hardwood throughout, beamed ceilings, new windows, roof, plumbing, electrical, insulation, kitchen, bathrooms, asphalt driveway… Move in now! “
“Dead End w/Fenced in yard.”
Sounds about right.
This is really overpriced, even by HGTV standards.
If we apply some HGTV math to the house, it’s still expensive:
According to HGTV,
1. a new bath costs 25k to put in, but can add 65k to the value of the home.
2. He probably did some painting. A new coat of paint for the interior costs $2,000, but adds $15,000 in value.
3. After adding some shrubs and sod for $3,000, that adds another $20k in value.
He’s still about 30k over what the price should be.
Another worry for the housing market - losing mortgage tax deduction for large houses:
LA Times
Bill would end mortgage tax deduction for ‘McMansions’
Homes 3,000 square feet and up would lose a popular deduction under Dingell’s ‘carbon tax’ bill.
http://tinyurl.com/ysa834
“But realty and building groups were quick to offer critiques. The senior economist for the National Assn. of Realtors, Lawrence Yun, produced preliminary estimates that terminating mortgage-interest tax deductions for all single-family dwellings larger than 3,000 square feet would result in a national median house price decline of 4% — on all homes, not just large houses.”
NAR has all along claimed that there was never a national median price decline (YOY) in the last 50 or so years - no matter what happened to the rest of the economy. But the moment they remove the mortgage tax deduction for McMansions, the median prices for all houses will decline by a whopping 4%! Makes sense, doesn’t it?
Of all the trade organizations, NAR probably has the most selfish bunch of people.
IMO we will see a lowering of the mortgage interest deduction as part of tax reform whenever that may happen….
Incredible sense of timing on the part of this Dingbat. 90% of the reason people overpay for a house is so that they can “screw” the IRS out of tax money (never mind that they wind up paying 3x that amount to the lender in interest, and that the standard deduction often covers much of the “savings”).
Kill off that “benefit” and housing, particularly high-end housing is ABSOLUTELY TOAST. The only other significant reason then to buy a house becomes appreciation, and, finally, the MSM is starting to let people know our little secret here.
Your house is worth is less? Good.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1655723,00.html
From the article:
“So why is the real estate collapse a good thing? First, because the collapse of any financial bubble can be interpreted as a morality play: greed gets its comeuppance.”
Beautiful! Well-said.
I like this quote:
But when we do not even guarantee basic health care, it would be nuts to think about making protection against real estate losses part of the social safety net.
No kidding. I’d give up our mortgage interest deduction, and the capital gains exemption we get when we sell, to see National Healthcare finally become a reality. To say nothing of the war in Iraq and tax-breaks for oil company research…
I agree, and this is how the Dems should play it: “So sorry you didn’t read the find print that loan shark put in front of you. Instead of dumping a bunch of $$ back into financial markets, almost none of which will reach you, we will offer you financial counseling, a renter’s credit on your taxes, and health insurance so you can weather the coming financial storms. If we can ever extricate ourselves from Iraq, we will also put more $$ towards higher ed so your children will have a chance.”
THAT would be a new day in America. What we’re hearing now is just more of the same (though I do like Dingell’s idea of reducing the mortgage deduction for large homes).
Finally the mainstream media prints what Ben’s bloggers have been telling us for years. Falling house prices are a blessing.
I came to this blog this morning looking for a little sanity after having read the linked article. I’d like to believe that it’s all just left-wing propaganda.
http://tinyurl.com/2lc8jo
“How is it done? How do you screw the taxpayer for millions, get away with it and then ride off into the sunset with one middle finger extended, the other wrapped around a chilled martini? Ask Earnest O. Robbins — he knows all about being a successful contractor in Iraq.
You start off as a well-connected bureaucrat: in this case, as an Air Force civil engineer, a post from which Robbins was responsible for overseeing 70,000 servicemen and contractors, with an annual budget of $8 billion. You serve with distinction for thirty-four years, becoming such a military all-star that the Air Force frequently sends you to the Hill to testify before Congress — until one day in the summer of 2003, when you retire to take a job as an executive for Parsons, a private construction company looking to do work in Iraq.
Now you can finally move out of your dull government housing on Bolling Air Force Base and get your wife that dream home you’ve been promising her all these years. The place on Park Street in Dunn Loring, Virginia, looks pretty good — four bedrooms, fireplace, garage, 2,900 square feet, a nice starter home in a high-end neighborhood full of spooks, think-tankers and ex-apparatchiks moved on to the nest-egg phase of their faceless careers. On October 20th, 2003, you close the deal for $775,000 and start living that private-sector good life….”
Let’s not act too surprised…a contractor recently got in trouble for charging hundreds of thousands of dollars of shipping on a 20 cent bolt, multiple times. They were taking advantage of an automated billing system that the military had, getting paid these outrageous shipping charges for years until they were recently caught.
Anyone else see the print edition of the Chicago Tribune this morning?
This is the lead story:
The Next Credit Crunch?
Front page, top-of-the-fold. Title font is as large as the Chicago Tribune marquee. I think this is a big deal!
Some good quotes:
“You’re not going to be able to get that mortgage loan. You’ll be stuck with the higher interest credit card debt,” warns Carl Steidtmann, chief economist with Deloitte Research. “We will have to live within our means. I know it’s a troubling phenomenon. But we’re not going to be able to spend at levels well above our income levels.”
“This is a call to consumers to rein in their discretionary spending. Your home was never intended to finance your tennis shoes or allow you to carry an $800 designer bag.”
And what’s this? A reporter telling us that an economist is full of it?!?
…Even so, Diane Swonk, chief economist at Mesirow Financial in Chicago, isn’t worried.
“Much of the shakeout in credit quality occurred in the 1990s,” she said last week. “It’s really amazing not to see the default rate for credit cards track mortgage defaults, but that isn’t happening.”
Not yet.
Ironically, credit card companies often do best right before the industry is about to tank…
Anyway, it’s a good read and very surprising to see such a negative article as the lead story for one of the nation’s major newspapers!
“We will have to live within our means. I know it’s a troubling phenomenon.”
BWAH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
Awwwwwwwww, we will actually have to live within our means. Can you imagine what life would be like?
Posted much earlier but not showing up, possibly due to accompanying incendiary political invective, which I have stripped out.
DEAN CALBREATH
Why can’t mortgages be more affordable?
August 26, 2007
Ever since P.T. Barnum imported an elephant named Jumbo to America, the word jumbo (based on an African word for elephant) has been a synonym for gigantic. Huge. Enormous.
Except when it comes to home loans. Especially in a place like San Diego.
Across the nation, a jumbo mortgage is defined as any loan that is above the “conforming limit,” which is currently set at $417,000.
If you take out a mortgage for $417,001, your loan is suddenly elephantine, meaning that you will probably have to pay a higher interest rate and make a bigger down payment, as well as provide greater proof of creditworthiness, than a lucky guy who gets a loan for $416,999.
In a place like Jackson, Miss., where the median price of a home is about $145,000, a $417,000 loan is truly jumbo. That kind of money could buy you a plantation on the Delta, complete with mint juleps, grilled catfish and a Panama cigar.
But in most neighborhoods in San Diego County, where the median home price is $489,000, a jumbo loan barely gets you through the door of a “reduced price” house. Only 20 of the 92 ZIP codes in the county have a median price of less than $417,000, including San Ysidro, Logan Heights and Paradise Hills.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20070826/news_1b26dean.html
And now for a toned-down version of the incendiary invective:
Why should financially conservative red state residents have to funnel welfare to rich left coasters in the form of an implicit interest rate subsidy on GSE-supported lending to buy McMansions priced above $417,000? I have never agreed more strongly with the CIC on any issue than this one.
Professor: you forget that San Diego is a red, conservative city. The housing bubble is politically neutral, despite your invective.
we will actually have to live within our means. Can you imagine what life would be like?
Carnival is over?
http://tinyurl.com/yp9bbt
Contrarian Chronicles8/27/2007 12:01 AM ET
How regulators fed the credit mess
Obscure accounting rules approved last year made it easier for over-leveraged financial institutions to get ever more creative and cover up shaky numbers.
By Bill Fleckenstein
How tragic for Enron that the FASB was several years too late with this rule change.
Officially blessed fudging
Kudos to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) for creating this fiasco last September, when “it approved a new, three-level hierarchy for measuring ‘fair values’ of assets and liabilities, under a pronouncement called FASB Statement No. 157, which Wells Fargo (WFC, news, msgs) adopted in January,” as Weil reported.
…
“Then there’s Level 3. Under Statement 157, this means fair value is measured using ‘unobservable inputs.’ While companies can’t actually see the changes in the fair values of their assets and liabilities, they’re allowed to book them through earnings anyway, based on their own subjective assumptions. Call this mark-to-make-believe.“
Does the Fed accept collateral valued under the mark-to-make-believe accounting standard?
As usual, Fleck hit lots of “bull’s eyes” with this piece.
As for those folks who might quibble by saying that the Fed only cut the discount rate, the truth is that the liquidity it provided has had Fed funds trading below its target for nearly two weeks. So it has been a de facto ease. In any case, the Fed’s rate cuts cannot solve the bad-debt problem left in the wake of the real-estate/credit bubble.
Macho men crying ‘Mommy’
One final comment about the financial world: It’s populated with rich, hypocritical whiners. Wall Street, the hedge-fund community and their lap dogs in the news media continually brag about how much they love capitalism and free markets.
Yet when the creative-destruction component of capitalism rears its ugly head, they want the central planners to bail them out immediately, before they take any pain. And the ones clamoring the loudest are the very same folks who behaved the most irresponsibly.
I like that Fleckenstein.
Americans earned a smaller average income in 2005 than in 2000, the fifth consecutive year of decline, the government reported recently. That occurred even as the cost of health care increased for many U.S. workers, and the burden for funding retirement continued to shift onto their shoulders.
Meanwhile, median home prices in the U.S. have increased from $119,600 in 2000 to $213,900 in 2005, a 79 percent increase, boosted in part by middle-class families that have paid premiums to purchase homes near good schools.
This is why home prices will have to fall regardless of bailouts. If lending standards become more stringent people will not qualify for most of these overpriced houses based on income.
Goodbye cable TV, with highspeed i’net.
Goodbye Ipod.
Goodbye Xbox.
Goodbye Cell phone.
Hello taking care of your aging parents.
Yet the supply side criminals insist wages are up….. and some people still believe it!
Just received an email from a realtor in FL. I’d gone on her site to check out the MLS numbers, etc for stats. She wanted to know if we were ready to buy, since it was a great time with low rates and all the inventory to pick from. I told her that I was a realtor in Ohio (I have an active license, but I haven’t practised for 3 years-didn’t tell her that). I told her that I’ve been closely watching the market and it’s definitely is not a good time to buy. I told her that housing prices in Fl and all the bubble areas have a long, long way to fall. I told her I wasn’t interested in being stuck with someone else’s mistake. Doubt she’ll email me again. Realtors like this are the reason I got out of the business and they just piss me off to no end. I can still do referrals and collect referral fees and I haven’t done one in over 2 1/2 years. Anyone who asks me about buying gets to hear the whole HBB tirade from me. I’m telling them to wait at least until 09 and then re-evaluate. I hope the ones pushing people to buy, make big enemies and end up destroying their whole referral network. They shouldn’t be allowed to have a license. They’re disgraceful.
Good for you, Ghostwriter.
With your feet on the air and your head in the ground
Try this flip and dump it, yeah (Yeah!)
Your market will collapse
And there’s nothing in it
And youll ask yourself
Where is my Hedge?
Where is my Hedge?
Where is my Hedge?
Way underwater, see it sinking
I was flippin’ like a Floridian
Appraisers were hiding behind the rock
Except the little Ben
But they told me, he swears
Tryin to talk to me PIMCO Pimp, Co.
Where is my Hedge?
Where is my Hedge?
Where is my Hedge?
Way underwater, see it sinking
D-ratic pols seem to be at the nexus of activity in pushes to increase corporate welfare giveaways to the Ueberrich. We live in strange times.
Blackstone lobbies against US tax rise
By Stephanie Kirchgaessner in Washington
Published: August 24 2007 23:25 | Last updated: August 24 2007 23:25
Blackstone, the private equity group that went public in June, sent a senior Democratic lawmaker a confidential assessment of the potential effect a proposed tax increase would have on its books to lobby against the plan.
In a letter to Senator John Kerry obtained by the Financial Times, Blackstone warned that a proposal under consideration by the Senate finance committee would diminish its market capitalisation by $10.5bn.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/f3db3360-528f-11dc-a7ab-0000779fd2ac,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2Ff3db3360-528f-11dc-a7ab-0000779fd2ac.html&_i_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fhome%2Fus
Has anyone made the connection between the asset backed commercial paper (ABCP) market and falling home prices? Subprime loans may not be the only challenge. ABCP sellers also fund credit cards and auto loans through this market. If households were unable to refinance homes and pay off credit card balances and other short term loans, the ABCP market might face additional challenges.
I don’t know if the MSM has made that connection, but folks on this blog are all over it. It’s the entire credit industry (a.k.a. “financial market”) that is collapsing.
London’s ABCP market is backing up:
London’s banking system is clogged up with a growing backlog of short-term loans estimated to stand at some $25bn (£12.4bn).
Although an air of calm has descended on equity markets, the short-term money markets remain chaotic say senior bankers, who warn that the market for asset backed commercial paper (ABCP) - loans that typically last between 60 and 90 days - has ground to a halt….
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/08/26/cnloans126.xml
A good description varying money market funds and risk:
There are three main types of money funds. Government funds invest in securities issued or backed by the federal government, Fannie or Freddie. (A subcategory, Treasury funds, invest only in Treasury securities.)
Prime money market funds can invest in a wider range of securities including Treasurys, certificates of deposit, commercial paper issued by corporations and asset-backed commercial paper. They are considered slightly less safe than government funds and generally yield slightly more.
Tax-free funds buy debt issued by states and local governments.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/08/26/BUN6RO8Q3.DTL
The Economist thinks this might be the end of the beginning. Some wonder if this is not the beginning of the end:
THE relief is palpable, though it may prove short-lived. Efforts by central banks to jump-start stalled financial markets by injecting huge amounts of liquidity—and, in the Federal Reserve’s case, by cutting the lending rate at its banks-only “discount window”—have kept worst-case scenarios at bay. But uncertainty over who holds what assets, and what losses have hit where, should keep prudent investors on edge.
For better or worse, there are signs that investors are tiptoeing back into riskier assets, one toe at a time. On August 24th the yield on “safe-haven” three-month US Treasury bills rose for a fourth straight day, reversing an earlier collapse when money-market funds and others switched out of commercial paper and other short-term corporate IOUs (see chart).
http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9708455
Short-term treasuries dropped because the treasury announced mass sales for next week. Supply and demand… Huge demand with low supply, prices climb. Treasury will flood the market to bring the price back down.
What is this about? Is this a “tin-foil-hat” move or something else?
“There are 65,000 contracts @ $750.00 for the SPX 700 calls for open interest.”
http://tinyurl.com/yw8q4f