August 27, 2007

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For August 27, 2007

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

250 Comments »

Comment by exeter
2007-08-27 04:31:49

Boomberg radio reported existing sales at 2002 levels. Wouldn’t it be safe to presume that the price support floor is at 2002? I know I know. Sellers are delusional but I’m talking from a market perspective.

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-08-27 06:00:46

Must be forecast, since the actual numbers are not out yet.

In PHX we’ve been at “lowest level since 2001″ since May and that is said to be a “normal market”. No mention that 2001 was a below norm year due to the tech-wreck. No mention that our population is suposidly 20% higher since then.

Our “normal market” is the lowest population adjusted number of transactions since the late 70s stagflation with 12+% interest rates.

Comment by exeter
2007-08-27 06:04:26

It seems to me that transaction prices would reflect sales activity, adjusted for inflation regardless of year, location, etc.

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-08-27 06:20:30

I understand what you are saying. It was the high number of transactions that drove pries up, and low number of transactions would cause prices to fall.

I kind of disagree. A number of transactiosns in the range of the support level…. Let’s say 1 million new households are added ever year, and 1 million new homes were being built and sold… then prices would tend to just be flat.

The ending of the $0 down and Alt-A markets in August will KILL transaction levels. I would not be surprised to see existing home transactions down 50% from July to August.

When they starts saying, lowest level of activity on record….when the banks are forced to liquidate their REOs… that is when the price cuts get rolling.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by dude
2007-08-27 09:06:13

Not to mention that oversize inventories must start to decline before any pricing floor is reached.

Supply/demand anyone?

 
 
Comment by arizonadude
2007-08-27 06:30:49

Has anyone ever heard of primerica financial? I’m trying to gather some information on this company.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by michael
2007-08-27 07:10:16

are you sure it’s not pramerica?

 
Comment by Wrenter
2007-08-27 07:47:35

google “Primerica Scam” and see what comes up - it’s a doozy. have had a couple of friends start to get caught up until I point them in this direction.

 
Comment by zeropointzero
2007-08-27 07:52:24

I believe they bought the A.L. Williams life insurance company in the 80’s or early 90’s (or maybe they simply were A.L. Williams and changed their name to Primerica) …. they were a “term” life insurance company that was accused of shady sales practices (by the folks who sold whole-life insurance). Of course, they may be involved in a lot more — but that’s one thing they were into.

 
Comment by Blano
2007-08-27 08:22:52

Zero is correct. They bought A.L. Williams, and it was an A.L. rep that approached me. About a year later, another “rep” approached me with the EXACT same pitch, word for word. Their thing was “buy term and invest the difference.” What they conveniently left out was “invest in A.L. mutual funds with 5 or 6 percent loads.” When Primerica bought them, I just figured it was one scammer getting in bed with another.

 
Comment by Moman
2007-08-27 09:39:34

Look in the Florida post - I gave you some information there.

 
Comment by arizonadude
2007-08-27 10:42:50

Thanks for all the information everyone.

 
Comment by Chicago Bubble Blog
2007-08-27 12:08:17

“are you sure it’s not pramerica?”

or Kramerica.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 09:22:42

Sales activity reflects availability of financing sufficient to meet seller reservation prices, and buyers who are qualified to borrow and willing to pay what sellers demand. The big drop in sales suggests a dearth of qualified and interested buyers able to get large enough loans to cover seller wishing prices. The credit crunch of the first two weeks of August will serve to further pinch the availability of mortgage financing.

Lower sales prices normally follow a drop off in the rate of sales, as sellers move on from the denial stage of housing bubble grief through anger, bargaining and depression to finally reach the (offer) acceptance stage.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2007-08-27 06:24:34

population adjustment is a key, just like cpi
better ignore both

 
 
Comment by dba
2007-08-27 06:27:32

depends on the local market

the craziness didn’t really start until 2004. rates went up in 2003 and everyone expected the housing market to be flat. and that’s when it shocked everyone and took off. and it was 2004 when i remember every week there was a thread about ARM’s on fatwallet.

doesn’t really matter now if they were real or if it was guerilla marketing

 
Comment by TulipsAllOverAgain
2007-08-27 07:28:52

I’m sure we’ll get to this when Ben puts up a separate thread, but the latest sales data reflects sales that were entered into in May/June and closed in July. Given how the data trails by a month or two, it won’t be until October/November until we see the effect of the credit crunch that began in earnest in August.

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-08-27 07:39:24

I disagree that it will take until Aug to see the affect of August credit tightening.

A huge chunk of the contracts signed in July won’t be closing in August.

I first expect to see pending home sales JUMP, then see closing crash. We’ll get those numbers 3 and 4 weeks from now.

Comment by Ravenor
2007-08-27 08:46:00

Darrell,
I can give you my personal experience on the escrow process that took place during August on a sales contract I signed in July. We had made an offer on a home being offered by a flipper in a rural community within 20 miles of Portland, OR. We expected to close the first week of August, and used a major bank based in Seattle as our lender. We had successfully closed the sale of our home in another state that first week of August and expected the closing on our purchase of this existing home quickly.

I had plenty of cash for a downpayment and a good credit score. The escrow process was a nightmare. The bank would literally call each day and ask for a new piece of documentation. They should have given me a list up front, but instead dragged it out. Then one day, the branch lending officer called me up and told me the underwriters wanted an extra 5% down. Fortunately for me and my family, I had realized enough cash from my sale that I just had to say, “No problem, do it.” I imagine there are a lot of folks out there that received the same message from their lenders and couldn’t come up with the cash.

Then the bank’s underwriting department didn’t seem to think that closing my loan was particularly important, as we would send them the information requested and then hear nothing for an entire day. I had my attorney send the bank branch an email asking why the bank didn’t consider the closing an urgent matter and I called and complained to the branch manager as well. Their response was that the underwriting department (located in Chicago) wasn’t being very responsive. So we finally get the keys two weeks after the original expected closing date. Of course, this was all going on at the same time that the credit markets were seizing up, so I had a few heart palpitations there. This is just my story, but I suspect that there are quite a few others out there who could relate.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Michael
2007-08-27 10:45:20

I spoke to a realtor on Friday about how long it would take a transaction to go through and she said that cash should be two weeks but that all the ducks needed to be lined up if there was a mortgage involved. Not sure what that meant in terms of weeks but I got the feeling that it was between one and two months.

It’s been a quiet but wild day in the markets. Fed did a nice pump this morning and there’s an inverted head and shoulders on the QQQQs right now. I wonder which way she breaks.

 
 
 
 
Comment by david cee
2007-08-27 07:54:34

Any reports based on median prices is garbage in this bubble enviornment. Please repeat after me Location, Location, Location. The facts are the rich are getting richer, and buying and not losing their upscale enclaves..it’s the middle class and poor that are getting loan adjustments that they can’t make, and are losing their houses. Plus, it’s the middle class and poor losing their jobs that will drive their neighborhoods into foreclosure cycles. Median prices, or going back to 2002 pricing, will be meaningless when Location determines how this thing unravels.

The reports using median as a benchmark, missed the obvious to Ben’s Bloggers on the way up, and are behind the curve on the way down.

Comment by jsocal
2007-08-27 10:29:07

In 2004 a major mortgage broker in Manhattan Beach CA, one of the priciest markets in the state, told me 70% of their loans were NOT 30 year fixed. Am I wrong for assuming even the richest of the rich will choke when the ARM resets on their multi-million dollar bungalows as values decline?
I’m not so much disagreeing as saying no one, and no community is going to escape the pain.

Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2007-08-27 11:16:26

People who prudently planned will not be hurt so much by the collapse. People who overleveraged, regardless of relative wealth, will be hurting.

I personally know of a 3+ million dollar home heading for foreclosure.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2007-08-27 11:24:39


“Any reports based on median prices is garbage in this bubble environment. Please repeat after me Location, Location, Location. The facts are the rich are getting richer, and buying and not losing their upscale enclaves… it’s the middle class and poor that are getting loan adjustments that they can’t make, and are losing their houses.”

True at the present, but the depression during 2008-10 will change all that. 60-80% of the rich will cease to be rich and the middle class will sink to 15-20% of the households. 75% poor households will be ready to vote for someone who will put an end to the current system. And who to blame?

Curb the greedy global financiers
While obeisant governments bail out dodgy plutocrats, it’s ordinary people who foot the bill

Will Hutton
Sunday August 26, 2007
The Observer
http://business.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2156599,00.html

Jas

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2007-08-27 04:32:18

Crunch…. I see no way around a recession this go round, with a capital “R”

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-sun_crunch0826aug26,0,4784210.story

Comment by palmetto
2007-08-27 04:42:31

“You’re not going to be able to get that mortgage loan. You’ll be stuck with the higher interest credit card debt,” warns Carl Steidtmann, chief economist with Deloitte Research. “We will have to live within our means. I know it’s a troubling phenomenon. But we’re not going to be able to spend at levels well above our income levels.”

Yes, and it will be most interesting to find out exactly what our “means” really are, that will be where the rubber meets the road. Take away all credit and let’s see where the American citizen really is financially.

And also, reinstitute the usury laws and fixed rates on CCs.

Comment by cynicalgirl
2007-08-27 04:49:00

No, it’s not “troubling” to have to live within your means. I’ve been doing it all my life. I call it “normal”.

Comment by Rally Mitigation Team Member Bob
2007-08-27 05:16:20

Actually, your lifestyle isn’t normal at all by today’s standards, but it is commendable nonetheless. :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2007-08-27 06:03:59

Got cash?

 
Comment by sohonyc
2007-08-27 09:33:06

“Got Cash?”

The problem with cash is that Bernanke is becoming a Jedi Master at stealthy ways of creating money. It’s starting to look like his game is to lend banks money, and later forgive that debt.

Recessions (and deflations) are big pluses for cash, only if the Fed does nothing and allows the recession to happen. The question is — is Bernanke capable of sitting on his hands? The evidence so far, says no.

In which case, “Cash” is not king.

 
Comment by Kime
2007-08-27 13:02:24

“The problem with cash is that Bernanke is becoming a Jedi Master at stealthy ways of creating money. It’s starting to look like his game is to lend banks money, and later forgive that debt.”

He didn’t create any money. He just loaned money to give the banks time to sell assets to raise cash. What makes you think the Federal Reserve will forgive that debt? No way they will do that. They are not loaning any money on non-performing mortgages, only top rated debt.

 
Comment by Mary Lee
2007-08-27 20:02:20

Books…and more books. Loathe tv. I admit it - I’m a 20-oz latte addict. We fairly frequently treat ourselves to terrific restaurants….

 
 
Comment by IllinoisBob
2007-08-27 05:32:26

Your not the only one :-) Pay the !@#$% card off EVERY month, Keep a auto 10+ years / 100k+ miles or till it rusts, Mortgage

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2007-08-27 05:34:13

We live significantly under our means. You’d laugh if you saw the 23 year old furniture we have.

 
Comment by Lou Minatti
2007-08-27 05:36:11

I use my credit card for all purchases, even when I buy a $2 hamburger. I am taking my family on a free vacation to Disneyworld this winter. Thanks, Citi! Betcha hate me because I don’t carry a balance. HAHA!

 
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-08-27 05:37:57

I got so sick of people looking down their noses at me and my 5+ y-o vehicles… “I’ll always get a new car every 2 years”…

Great, that means I can get a 2-year-old car for half the price of new, then drive it for 10 years… Thank you ms./mr. Have-to-have-a-new-car! You cut my transportation costs substantially.

 
Comment by Central Valley Guy
2007-08-27 05:59:09

I’m pretty much in line with y’all on the fiscal prudence issue but I have to ask, does anyone here splurge on ANYTHING? What is/are your weaknesses?

 
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-08-27 06:02:58

Lou, they make fees on the transactions. They do NOT hate you. They don’t love you, but they really don’t hate you.

The credit card people (and just about everyone else) hates the people that still write checks…

 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-08-27 06:05:04

“What is/are your weaknesses?”

Food & liquor.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-08-27 06:11:06

Truly, my weaknesses are books for my kids. I have trouble going into the school book fair and walking out with less than $100 bucks worth.

My personal weaknesses include skiing and other outdoor activities.

 
Comment by Bad Chile
2007-08-27 06:14:07

I just splurged on a new guitar, but it was at 60% of the normal street price. I had the full price saved up for a while and was just waiting for a deal. Got the deal, got the guitar.

And a finely poured pint of a good IPA always opens my wallet.

 
Comment by Devildog
2007-08-27 06:16:34

“What is/are your weaknesses?”

I spend $20 a month on Blue Bell ice cream.

 
Comment by pressboardbox
2007-08-27 06:27:32

Condos, Hummers, and vactations are my only weaknesses. Other than those I could live easily within my means.

 
Comment by exeter
2007-08-27 06:34:34

I’d snatch up an american strat or PRS at the right price.

 
Comment by txchick57
2007-08-27 07:08:05

Art, specifically, glass art.

 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-08-27 07:08:35

I splurge on travel. I prefer luxury travel. It is important to have some indulgences. I have other luxuries that I consider important to recharge my batteries. My income varies greatly between $120,000 and $240,000 per year so I make a point to maximize my 401k contributions and IRA contributions first (pure stock mutual funds), participate at my comfort level in my employee stock purchase plan, buy a set amount of government securities per month (and some precious metals), and then spend extra money on my splurges. In the lean years I don’t do splurges.

 
Comment by motepug
2007-08-27 07:15:46

I splurge on sporting equipment - a new fangled carbon fiber bicycle this year, news ski’s, seasons ski pass.

 
Comment by veloblues
2007-08-27 07:25:08

“What is/are your weaknesses?”

“I can resist everything but temptation”–Oscar Wilde

 
Comment by Ft Lauderdale
2007-08-27 07:29:39

books, boat gas and red wine.

 
Comment by Roidy
2007-08-27 07:37:00

Ice cream. Dairy Queen, Marble Slab, Baskin Robbins, home made, store bought, it doesn’t matter. It just needs to be ice cream.
Roidy

 
Comment by txchick57
2007-08-27 07:44:11

Bill, I think I speak for many people here when I say . . . put a cork in it, son. We are tired of hearing about how you fund your various retirement schemes. I suspect you will die with every penny of your money unspent but you’ll have a hell of a good time admiring all your various account statements before that happens.

Loosen up!

 
Comment by KIA
2007-08-27 07:52:47

Used books, Used DVDs and survival gear. When I splurge, it’s a new rifle or a bucket of ammo. The ammo gets reloaded. The rifles hold their value shockingly well.

Oh, yeah. Forgot one thing - Sweetwater Tavern. Brewhouse with three locations in Northern Virginia, makes its own excellent beer, sells it to go in half-gallon growlers which can be refilled for $6.00 or $7.00, depending on the brew. Awesome. When was the last time you got a half-gallon of great beer for $7.00?

 
Comment by ajas
2007-08-27 08:01:03

haha roidy, yeah buying ice cream for my girlfriend is definitely one thing I won’t skimp on. Haagen-Dazs mint chocolate chip or black raspberry chip. If food were words, it would mean ‘love’.

And steak. Mmmm, steak.

As far as big stuff like plasma TVs or video game consoles that I am tempted to buy… I shop around the internet, compare models and prices, and then realize that everything will be better and cheaper in 6mos so I put it off til later.

The key to saving money is procrastination.

 
Comment by scdave
2007-08-27 08:04:30

your weaknesses?” Coors Lite for me…..

 
Comment by polly
2007-08-27 08:05:06

Splurges? Biggest recent splurge was getting some original costume sketches I bought in Canada framed - properly framed. Cost a bundle. And I go on vacation at least once a year, most often a week at the Stratford Festival in Ontario. My family never went away on vacation when I was a kid.

Car is a 1997 Ford Taurus that just hit 100K miles and I bought for the estimated wholesale (auction) value because it was a sales support fleet car from my former employers. As long as the AC still works and it starts reliably, I don’t see any reason to switch.

I’ve stopped buying books. No more room for shelves in this apartment.

 
Comment by speedingpullet
2007-08-27 08:06:09

Strangely, knowing that we can afford pretty much anything we want (well, except for a house at the moment…) makes it a lot easier to ‘just say no’ to excesses.

That said, the husband and I are what the advertising industry calls ‘other-directed’, in that neither of us has ever thought that Things Maketh The Man. We do a budget every year and include luxuries, so no suprise we live within our means.

We splurge on music (download and vinyl) for the husband and I buy a lot of art supplies for my craft business, but we still manage to have a couple of hundred a month left over.

Actually, we do like to travel, and will do so at the drop of a hat - we both have family left in the UK, so an annual trip back to Blighty takes out a lump of change.

@txchick…..glass art, eh? I’m learning Lampwork at the moment, and I’ll let you know if I make anything worth looking at (not much that makes it though the kiln process at the moment, but practise makes perfect…).

 
Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-08-27 08:07:21

Hey Tx. You’re retired aren’t you? You seem to spend time being bothered by my posts. Just ignore me.

 
Comment by packman
2007-08-27 08:17:55

Good wine and good beer.

Coors lite scdave? You’re joking right? That’s not even splurging when you’re in college! Give me Guinness or the like any day - don’t really like IPA either.

Good workshop tools are a weakness for me too. I figure at least with that I can recoup some investment over the long run though.

 
Comment by Blano
2007-08-27 08:26:24

Used books, cherry cordial ice cream, and cheap beer.

 
Comment by OTownCajun
2007-08-27 08:40:07

Red wine and fine dining.

 
Comment by LILLL
2007-08-27 08:51:19

I splurge on private school for my teen, Cote du Rhone, and the ability to enjoy life debt free.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2007-08-27 08:54:06

I have to ask, does anyone here splurge on ANYTHING? What is/are your weaknesses?

Disney vacations. While my wife is middle of the road about them, my kids and I thoroughly enjoy them. We usually do Anaheim vs. Orlando because it is substantially less expensive.

 
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2007-08-27 09:13:01

Splurge: Weekends in nice hotels with nice food; hordes of magazine subs from US and various other countries; buying (actually buying, not downloading) every CD made by name-yer-local-unknown-musicians. Other than that, I am perhaps sadly much like Bill in Phoenix, who txchick57 admonishes:

you’ll have a hell of a good time admiring all your various account statements

Hmmm.. I guess I too am a sad git who would just as well admire a nice stock certificate as any valuable modern artwork I could put on the wall. But no, the stocks and various accounts are for a purpose: For when I need a new car and can pay cash, for when I spot a horrendously good deal on some real estate (unlikely recently), and to squander in retirement on easy living.

 
Comment by mathguy
2007-08-27 09:26:06

I’ll try not to be too much of a salesman, but check out our Disney packages next time you are going. I have waaaay better deals than you can get at the front gate, and you can buy your tickets WILLCALL, so you don’t have to stand in line. Just head right to customer service, and your tickets are waiting. Here is the link:

http://reservations.californiasunhotels.com/681_attraction-tickets_a18.html?ticketID=1304

BTW, I wrote a good portion of the e-commerce engine on our site, so I appreciate any constructive criticism.

 
Comment by SD_suntaxed
2007-08-27 09:45:53

Good dark chocolate. Single origin is even better.
Books
Accessories for my DSLR camera

 
Comment by Moman
2007-08-27 09:46:57

My weakness is airplanes. I love to fly them and fly in them. Vacations are a second vice but time off from work is getting scarce. I’m just trying to live cheap and enjoy life.

 
Comment by ahansen
2007-08-27 09:58:01

Arable ranch land with good water sources, and horse-trekking through foreign countrysides and vineyards.

 
Comment by Michael
2007-08-27 10:53:14

This is a great thread: what do non-home-bubblers spend their money on?

I think that we spend $1,000 on books per year. The Barnes and Nobles membership certainly helps out there. We do use the local library quite a bit too.

Last luxury purchase was a MacBook Pro laptop ($1,800). Our living room and bedroom furniture is almost as old as txchick57’s. Our dining room furniture is back to my single days - mid-80s I think. My desk is early 1980s. Nothing wrong with old furniture. My mother’s furniture is probably from the 1960s.

 
Comment by MrBubble
2007-08-27 12:02:46

Weaknesses? I recently spent $500 for a bike to become less fat and a lot of money (for me) on Etymotic ear canal headphones (makes traveling bearable — almost enjoyable), but that purchase was two years ago. Damn, I’m a miser! But I buy whatever groceries I want. Recipe calls for maca-madamia nut oil and lobster, I buys ‘em.

Books — library
No TV
Music — pandora.com and the CDs I ripped lossless and sold, iPod was a gift
Movies — Netflix, never the theater
Good, but mid-priced bourbon.
Free wine from “my source” at an upscale winery

I may not work for pay this year to work on my eco non-profit, so parsimoniousness (and selling 6/05) does have its advantages and freedoms!

 
Comment by Uncle Git
2007-08-27 12:44:52

Travel and phototograhy are my big splurges - but unlike Bill I’m more of a dirtbag traveller than luxury :)

Heading back to Namibia next year to 4X4 across the Kalahari then back up into Botswana and the Okavanga.

http://www.twistedcube.com/unclegit/Africa/content/index.html

Some photo’s from this year’s trip in case anyone is interested ;)

 
Comment by Steve W
2007-08-27 12:51:29

Travel, single malt scotch, and more recently, replacing every darn thing that was in my fridge that spoiled after the hurricane blew through Chicago last thursday. ;)

 
Comment by Chad
2007-08-27 13:02:53

Wow, one heck of a splurge thread!!

“When was the last time you got a half-gallon of great beer for $7.00? ”

I get a half gallon growler refilled at Granite City (a restaurant / brewpub) for $5 on Tuesdays. Otherwise, it’s $9. Just started making my own beer at home too. I’m going to start fiddling with my own recipes very soon. And, I like to ski, a lot. Which is more expensive for me as I live in Iowa, and need to travel to Colorado to do it. However, as I now view most of you as extended family, I will share with you - I’m planning on making my splurge hobby (beermaking) into a business. I hope to go full time with it by Easter.

 
Comment by Chad
2007-08-27 13:05:10

Uncle Git, you take some beautiful photos!

 
Comment by robiscrazy
2007-08-27 20:22:32

Guns and ammunition are my weakness. Although, did thin down the collection a bit to just the basics. Reload my own cartridges, so cheaper to shoot. Range fees. All in all target shooting is still less expensive than golf…..at least, the way I do it. Besides, how practical are golf skills?

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2007-08-27 08:01:19

I was raised by a couple of people who lived within their means. And that’s how I live my life. (Thanks, Mom and Dad, for the valuable life lesson!)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ren
2007-08-27 08:23:03

Whereas my mother doesn’t even have a clue what that means. A childhood of endless collections calls, utilities shut off, charge cards denied for being over their limits, and watching Mom have to go begging to my grandparents for ‘loans’ taught me that I never wanted to live that way. (Thanks, Mom, for the valuable life lesson!)

I think I would have preferred to learn the lesson your way, Slim.

 
 
 
Comment by exeter
2007-08-27 06:13:17

“Take away all credit and let’s see where the American citizen really is financially.”

EXACTLY. But that would expose the deficit spending, supply side liars for what they are. Laffer, Kudlow and the monsters running the Cato Institute all know there is a lynch mob with rope in hand waiting for them. They are deadmen when the truth is reveal of the true state of economic matters on Main Street.

Comment by Bill in Phoenix
2007-08-27 07:10:52

“monsters running Cato institute.”

Cato is a libertarian think tank. You call free marketeers monsters? Most posters here are in line with the Cato institute.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by exeter
2007-08-27 07:13:50

Cato is loaded with mouthpieces for the supply side mantra, a’la Kudlow and Laffer. Allow “most posters” to speak for themselves.

 
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2007-08-27 09:23:32

OK, I will speak for myself. Cato is cool with me.

 
Comment by exeter
2007-08-27 09:56:27

Shifting the tax burden to the middleclass is cool too? How about that good old deficit spending….

 
Comment by Blano
2007-08-27 09:59:54

Wasn’t Cato the sidekick played by Bruce Lee on “Green Hornet?”

 
Comment by Waiting for the Fall
2007-08-27 11:09:01

Inspector Clouseau’s Houseboy-’My little yellow friend’

 
Comment by cashedin05
2007-08-27 22:44:11

I’m down with Cato.

 
 
Comment by motepug
2007-08-27 07:23:29

After running up a credit card (or a mortgage), you have to live on LESS what you were before you incurred the debt. Say you make $100/yr, and then get $25 in debt to buy a widget. The next year, you have to live on $75, and pay back the $25 debt, with interest.

Amazing how that works. There are so, so many FB’s out there, and they don’t even know it yet.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by wawawa
2007-08-27 06:35:50

“We will have to live within our means”

I seriousl doubt if Americans can do so.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2007-08-27 07:25:23

Me too. Besides, this isn’t just about their consuming, it is also about their livelyhood. Do most today even begin to realize how much their jobs rely on hyper-consumption? Sure, maybe the Hummer owner can make his payments - but if the Z71 p.u. owner misses his the Mr. Hummer will experience “trickle up” economics.

Like so many of you post, when the plankton die - so will the whales…and every slimy creature in between.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by NYCresident
2007-08-27 05:03:20

This article hints that the lending spigot for credit cards could go the way of the subprime mortgage–with substantially less credit availablity. But the article never lays out the case, but rather just teases with its headline. The mechanism for Wall Street funding of credit card recievables via asset-backed securities mirrors that of mortgages and corporate junk bonds and auto loans. The credit crunch in mortgages could spread to these other lending products, but it would require that investors lose confidence in the underwriting standards of these other products as well. The rising default rates in mortgages are at the crux of investor distrust in mortgages. A comparable default rate in other lending products would all but require a serious economic contraction.

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-08-27 05:42:26

I disagree..

Once people lose thier house, their credit ratign will drop substantially, which will trigger the credit card companies to raise their rates substantially, which will push them to bankruptcy, which will trigger losses to the ABS, which will make lenders risk averse there driving up interest rates, making everyone credit cards rates go up.

The feedback loop is in place, we just need the trigger event.

Comment by NYCresident
2007-08-27 08:53:02

The market could discount future foreclosures, then bankruptcies, then credit card losses. A credit crunch in selling credit card abs is a distinct possibility. But the tricky thing about credit card receivables is that the interest rates and fees are so high (usurious), that those losses due to bankruptcies and charge offs are mitigated by the enourmous profits from the paying customer.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Deron
2007-08-27 13:39:46

But the “paying customers” are largely making minimum payments. The zero balancers who are actually good credit risks never have a balance to securitize. Banks have targeted the lowest-quality borrowers for all sorts of credit as the long boom that began with Reagan’s reforms has gone on for 25 years, with only minor interruptions.

If there is any kind of real disruption in the economy, those bad-credit loans largely become losses - some slightly deferred. That’s why financial company earnings are highly deceptive right now. They report profits but are really sitting on enormous losses. Most of the principal will never be paid back and they have to hope they have enough time to collect interest before the whole thing blows up in their faces.

 
 
Comment by paul
2007-08-27 15:30:45

We all should remember, that common credit - meaning credit cards - only started out in the late sixties, early seventies. (coincidental with the final end of the PM standards - but I digress). Plenty of time for a CC retrenchment.

Paul

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Moman
2007-08-27 11:21:41

Woah….not gonna happen.

The worst thing the Fed wants is the credit card industry to dry up. It’s fine for them if a few speculators take a bath on a home mortgage (see what’s happening now) but to deny credit to the people would collapse this economy so quick the only people who would make it are those with lots of guns, ammo, and (paid-off) land for raising food.

Some people might find their ability to acquire and use credit cards limited but it will be those who are bankrupt because of mortgage excesses. The Fed would not allow the credit card market to go back, lest the 67% consumption of the current economy go the way of the horse and buggy.

Comment by Ghostwriter
2007-08-27 12:21:41

The way things are right now, FB’s will get new cc within 6 months of foreclosure. CC companies don’t care, they have so many ways to make money.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by walt526
2007-08-27 12:24:05

I agree entirely. The Fed will do anything to keep the consumer credit market viable. Without access to consumer credit, the global economy will relive the early 1930s.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by michael
2007-08-27 07:11:33

maybe neil should change his signature to

got job?

 
Comment by Chicago Bubble Blog
2007-08-27 12:20:54

“Freda Price, a divorced mother of two in Bethlehem, Pa., is trying to get her credit card debt under control. Five years ago, Price had a $49,000 mortgage and no significant credit card balances. But she now is struggling with $100,000 in mortgage and credit card balances because she has refinanced and used the cards to pay for attorneys in a long-running dispute over child custody with her ex-husband.”

It bothers me that the MSM constantly uses examples like this lady. I can feel for Ms. Price considering her legal battles over her children. But she’s the exception, not the rule. Most of the people in CC debt have done it buying flat screens, boats, new furniture & iPods. Very rarely, at least as I see, are those the people the MSM focuses on

 
 
Comment by NYCresident
2007-08-27 04:46:43

http://www.reuters.com/article/inDepthNews/idUSN2040778220070826?pageNumber=1

The housing woes in non-prime neighborhoods are going to raise the risk of home ownership big time. I don’t understand how a bank could attract buyers to a neighborhood of foreclosed homes with prices only 30% off peak. What kind of a bargain or buyer metrics will compensate for possible unstable ownership and tenancy risk?

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-08-27 05:13:28

Have you ever gone to a store where you see an ugly sweater selling for $39.95? It sits and sits and sits. Then somebody slaps a 30% off sticker onto the sweater and puts a price of $44.95 on it. It gets snatched up immediately. The genius that bought it thinks they just got a great deal.

Like an old buddy used to say, “put a sign on a jar of air that says 50% off and you will get a bunch of idiots to buy two at $14.95 apiece.” Most people see the word “foreclosure” and automatically think “bargain”.

Comment by combotechie
2007-08-27 05:31:45

But with the re-emergence of honest appraisers it won’t matter what the propective buyer think of the price; the appraiser will have the final say about financing, and it is financing which will make or break the sale.

Comment by M.B.A.
2007-08-27 08:44:33

really? where are they? have not seen them yet! ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by combotechie
2007-08-27 10:07:09

The honest appraisers will emerge because the lenders, who will from now on may have to (gulp) keep the loans they make, will demand that the property appraisals become an accurate reflection of the property’s true value.

 
 
 
Comment by san diego
2007-08-27 21:08:28

A friend of mine worked in a sporting goods store, and was rearranging the shoe department, so had all the shoes piled in shopping carts. He said the shoe’s were selling like crazy that day, people assumed they were on sale just because they were piled in the carts.

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2007-08-27 05:16:37

In NYC, that just means teachers, firefighters, and small store owners will be able to buy houses again. Really. $600K in East New York, Brooklyn? Make it $250K and someone will buy and move in. $1 million for a Park Slope condo? Make it $600K, and someone will buy it.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-08-27 05:50:28

“$1 million for a Park Slope condo? Make it $600K, and someone will buy it.”

That buyer sure won’t be me.

Comment by MGNYC
2007-08-27 07:06:59

Or me

but 600k for east ny? it is the most dangerous area in all the 5 boro’s . they settle minor arguments with gunshots in those parts

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by nyc-is-different
2007-08-27 10:04:42

The murders in East New York will be dwarfed by the NYC median home price murders to be committed by 3X income.

 
 
Comment by NovaWatcher
2007-08-27 08:11:10

I like this one:

“The Gordons fear they will lose hundreds of thousands of dollars in equity. “We have no recourse. We’ll have to live here eight to ten years before we get our equity back,” said Joe.”

8 to 10 years? Hah!

 
 
Comment by Lou Minatti
2007-08-27 04:51:53

Condo Crazy in Clear Lake. Plus, a small noise issue.

http://louminatti.blogspot.com/2007/08/condo-crazy-in-clear-lake.html

Comment by txchick57
2007-08-27 05:37:45

KEMAH????

You’ve got to be kidding. Did you photoshop those pics? Kemah is a shrimping hole!

Comment by Lou Minatti
2007-08-27 05:41:08

Kemah’s changed quite a bit over the past 10 years.

Comment by txchick57
2007-08-27 05:44:04

This must be the place my sister was yapping about wanting to buy in. I told her to wait two years, she’ll get one at half of these “preconstruction” prices.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by hobo in mass
2007-08-27 05:48:17

I was in Houston in the late 90’s and early 00’s….is Kemah the place that had all the fish markets on the water?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Devildog
2007-08-27 06:21:41

Yes.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-08-27 05:04:04

“The median price this year, estimated at $523,000, is expected to increase an average of 10 percent. However, prices in low-cost areas of the state, such as the Inland Empire, will increase by a higher rate, while prices in coastal areas will rise more slowly.

Appleton-Young dismissed the idea of a housing “bubble,” referring to next year’s outlook as a “soft landing.” While the median price of homes in California is far above that of the nation’s median of $188,000, California’s shortage of housing, strong demand and fairly strong economy guard against any precipitous price drop, she said.

She added that the somewhat perplexing low level of interest rates has made the market stronger than she had anticipated last year.”

I just had to pull out this golden oldie from September 2005. This shill sure got it right. The IE is still soaring. Isn’t it? Bwahahaha.

Comment by passthebubbly
2007-08-27 05:43:48

A housing “bubble”? What a crazy thought. How could that ever happen?

Comment by ajas
2007-08-27 09:48:59

If a bubble were possible, someone would definitely be blogging it.

Man, it makes me glad that the dumbest things I’ve ever said are lost in the dark endless annals of the internet and not plastered all over newspapers. Even MSM articles have taken to calling *AR spokespeople full of it. er “uniquely optimistic”, haha!

 
 
 
Comment by kckid
2007-08-27 05:15:28

Dingell’s Proposal to Limit Mortgage Interest Tax Break Sparks Worry Amid Housing Market Slump

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070824/mortgages_dingell.html?.v=1

The Michigan Democrat says doing so would discourage excess energy consumption and lessen emissions linked to climate change.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-08-27 06:10:36

Anybody see the headline that the auto industry has said they will move jobs out of Detroit unless they get an agreement for substantial wage cuts from the UAW? It looks like more pain for Detroit and the state of Michigan.

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-08-27 06:24:15

What they need to do is what the airlines did. Go through a bankruptcy restructuring and dump their retirement pension and health care plans. They’d be imensly profitable if they could compete with the Japaneese auto makers on a level playing field. However, having to pay benefits to retired workers makes the field VERY slanted against them.

Comment by mattR
2007-08-27 06:32:29

Actually, the housing and health care and pensions adds a few thousand, tops, on an American made car. Maybe if the bigwigs in detriot build non-ugly dependable fuel-efficient cars, they’d do okay. They used to sell this thing called the Taurus… best selling car for years.

Nah, screw that, let’s blame the unions.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by exeter
2007-08-27 07:01:26

Better yet, how about we stop “competing” against manufacturers who’s government provides their citizens health insurance and sound pensions? Going up against the likes of Japan where the citizenry have a national healthcare plan instead of burdening employers like Honda and Toyota doesn’t make for a truly competitive market.

 
Comment by chilidoggg
2007-08-27 07:20:15

can’t we sue Japan under the WTO for these types of subsidies? Don’t we get sued all the time for different types of tax breaks we allow, under WTO? If we can’t sue Japan, then we’ve got to go to some type of socialized healthcare.

 
Comment by exeter
2007-08-27 07:24:02

“Socialized” healthcare would require the govt. to buy all hospitals and everyone on govt. payroll. The japanese govt. doesn’t own the hospitals but they are smart enough to know that it isn’t a good idea to burden employers with the administration of health benefits.

 
Comment by yogurt
2007-08-27 07:32:11

Better yet, how about we stop “competing” against manufacturers who’s government provides their citizens health insurance and sound pensions?

The government doesn’t “provide” anyone with anything. The health care and pensions are paid for by the taxpayers, i.e. the autoworkers themselves, from the wages that the autoworkers pay them.

The reason universal healthcare provides a competitive advantage for automakers in Japan, Germany, and Canada is that it’s cheaper. US health care spending is 15% of GDP, Germany & Canada 10%, Japan 8%.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-08-27 07:35:04

“Better yet, how about we stop “competing” against manufacturers who’s government provides their citizens health insurance and sound pensions? Going up against the likes of Japan where the citizenry have a national healthcare plan instead of burdening employers like Honda and Toyota doesn’t make for a truly competitive market.”

Well said, exeter

….and well said, mattR, although I have seen some fine looking American made cars recently. Still, my almost 4 year old Toyota still looks like new after a good vacuum and waxing. Every system works like the day I bought it. Meanwhile my neighbors with the American vehicles are working with the planned obsolescence business model.
Excuse my Dr. Phil-ism when I ask the Big 3: How’s that workin’ for ya?

 
Comment by yogurt
2007-08-27 07:37:37

Er, the wages that the automakers provide them.

No universal social program can be a subsidy to any industry, because everyone pays and everyone benefits. A subsidy exists when society at large pays to give an advantage to a specific industry. Nobody considers public education a subsidy to industry, for example.

 
Comment by Dynastar
2007-08-27 07:47:59

So you’re advocating we nationalize our health care? I wouldn’t say the Japanese have “sound pensions” though- their looming retirement crunch makes out Social Security issues look like child’s play.

 
Comment by exeter
2007-08-27 07:51:13

Yes. Pick your poison. It will happen in some form soon.

 
Comment by polly
2007-08-27 08:50:08

You are never going to get the WTO to agree that provision of health care by the government is a government subsidy for any particular industry. Socialized health care has been in place for too long and in too many countries.

That (banana) boat has sailed. (Quick explanation - bananas have been litigated ad nauseum in the WTO)

If the union agreements didn’t allow people to retire so many years before they became eligible for Medicare, it wouldn’t be as much of a problem. The car companies made these agreements when they needed workers and delayed expenses looked like a better deal than increasing salaries. Good for the short term, bad for the long term. It didn’t occur to them that health care expenses might increase - a lot. So I guess short sightedness is nothing new in American business.

 
Comment by Skip
2007-08-27 09:25:11

Japanese have “sound pensions” though- their looming retirement crunch makes out Social Security issues look like child’s play.

I believe the Japanese government also owns the tobacco companies in Japan. Free smokes == no pension payments

 
Comment by Houstonstan
2007-08-27 09:42:32

I’ve worked in many countries and US is an anomoly for a modern country. In other nations, businesses don’t have to worry about underfunding healthcare. They just make things.

Healthcare is a competitive disadvantage to US companies.

 
 
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2007-08-27 07:08:37

What they need to do is what the airlines did. Go through a bankruptcy restructuring and dump their retirement pension and health care plans.

I don’t think bankruptcy would be good for them. The airline industry doesn’t finance the purchase of airline tickets. The automakers finance most purchases of cars, and Detroit gets most of the money to do so from people purchasing unsecured demand notes… A bankruptcy of convenience would almost certainly wipe that out and make it very hard and very expensive for Detroit to lend money to people so they can buy more cars.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Moman
2007-08-27 11:29:59

Or, the automakers could build a relevant product that people want to buy, and stop trying to restructure on the backs of the employees. nah, that makes too much sense.

 
 
Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-08-27 08:04:30

Yeah. Let’s just let Corporate America renege on every contract they have signed when its convenient.

I’m all for that after we hunt down every person in those organizations which held positions of responsibility over the past fifty years and prosecute, bankrupt, and imprison them for fraud in the inducement, fraudulent contracting or other such thing in their hiring practices.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2007-08-27 09:25:07

Funny how you can’t garnish a corporations future profits.

 
Comment by exeter
2007-08-27 09:37:52

Corporations and priveleged elite have had a 30 year party at our expense. Do they have a clue the party is nearing its end?

 
 
Comment by Ghostwriter
2007-08-27 12:29:24

If they do that the pensions will just go to the PBGC and the taxpayers will pay them. That’s what some of the airlines did.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Crapburner
2007-08-27 05:18:07

Hehehehehe….

Nine Pulte Homes built in 2002-3 south of me out of a 110 unit for sale since Spring of last year. Places built for $220-230K and my latenight skulking around in front of the RE signs reveal they are down to $175-180K.

This is in the east suburbs of Saint Paul.

Nothing and I mean nothing over 250K in my neighborhood is selling and they are still building!!!

This is going to end deadly.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-08-27 06:15:48

What suburbs would be the east suburbs? Are we talking Maplewood, Arden Hills and that area? I still say Minnesota will need to fall 30 - 40 percent. It is one of those bubbly coastal areas. It’s on the coast of the Mississippi.

Comment by Crapburner
2007-08-27 06:34:32

Oakdale-Woodbury…..example…six units of executive townhouses across from the Oakdale City Hall went up three years ago at 285K and they still stand unsold and flipped once. Low and behold…they proceed to build 6 more this summer.

Woodbury-Maplewood-Oakdale-White Bear is just going to get murdered in the 30-40 percent collapse that is here.

 
 
 
Comment by Rally Mitigation Team Member Bob
2007-08-27 05:20:28

Cutbacks Mount in Real Estate Industry
Project Plans Shelved, Workers Are Laid Off

By Cecilia Kang and Dina ElBoghdady
Washington Post Staff Writers
Monday, August 27, 2007; Page D01
http://tinyurl.com/2hwvw4

Washington’s real estate industry, already pinched by a slowdown in residential construction, is bracing for further retrenchment after last week’s meltdown in the mortgage market.

In recent months, companies have begun cutting back in big ways and small. A Prince George’s County builder laid off four workers and turned off the spigot for new projects. A four-person title company in Arlington is cutting its staff by one after watching business fall. A Fredericksburg drywaller let his 10 employees go and is struggling to keep the business afloat.

Individually the cuts are not large, but collectively they are beginning to add up across the region. Economists estimate that the real estate industry accounts for 12 to 15 percent of the jobs in the Washington area.

The sector has played a large role in the region’s economic growth over the past five years, and economists are watching recent events for signs of whether the slowdown will begin to drag down consumer spending and other parts of the local economy.

Stephen S. Fuller, a professor of public policy at George Mason University and head of its Center for Regional Analysis, said in addition to the job losses, local governments already are seeing housing-related tax revenue slow. Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D) largely blamed a housing slump in Northern Virginia for a $234 million budget shortfall.

But Fuller doubts the slowdown will affect the local economy as sharply as the telecommunications industry bust did in 2001. Construction jobs pay less than high-tech and government contracting jobs do, he said, and other industries should be able to absorb many of the low-wage service and retail jobs related to construction and housing.

Comment by flatffplan
2007-08-27 05:51:53

Fuller predicted increases in 06 too
what a dope

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-08-27 05:23:53

Does he have the mettle to save the dollar?

Aug. 27 (Bloomberg) — Ben S. Bernanke’s critics from Washington to Wall Street are starting to ask whether the Federal Reserve chairman is ready for a prime-time crisis.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aSXMwc6.2a7Q&refer=home

Comment by luvs_footie
2007-08-27 05:28:12

I wonder how long it will be, before China grabs Uncle Sam by the (orchestra stalls) and says COUGH

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-08-27 05:50:33

The problem is, doing that would kill their economy as badly or worse than it would hurt us.

They “own” a lot more dollars than we hold yuan, so dropping the value of the dollar substantially, hurts them. Also, there are a lot more poor countries willing to destroy their environment and manufacture crud cheaply, then there are nations willing to spend themselves into the poor house buying cheap goods.

Comment by nhz
2007-08-27 07:26:06

the other problem is that the dollar has nothing to drop against (except possibly gold). The euro and yen are fiercely competing on the race to the bottom.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by RoundSparrow
2007-08-27 07:32:11

The Yen has a ways to go, don’t be surprised for it to hit 102 by year end.

 
 
Comment by dublin212
2007-08-27 07:49:57

Nah - you forget that the chinese dollars were purchased with yuan they printed for that purpose. It’s free money as far as they are concerned. They can take a 50% haircut and not care. There’s plenty more where it came from. Totally unlike a real financial entity which borrows money with interest to play currencies.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-08-27 05:53:33

This article smacks of blackmail to me… Give us what we want or we’ll smear your name and get you fired.

Comment by Domi
2007-08-27 06:34:33

I agree.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-08-27 07:13:15

I’m imagining Volcker endured similar attacks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 09:36:16

Wall Street MSM mouthpiece attacks on BB are a good sign he is doing his job well. Congratulations to BB from the Cramers and Kudlows for a job well done gives the exact opposite indication.

Comment by Moman
2007-08-27 11:39:29

Exactly. Greenspan was loved by the markets because he let inefficiencies build. Ben is trying to work excess out of the market. Keep going Ben.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Comment by luvs_footie
2007-08-27 05:49:31

Europe gets subprime jitters.

August 27 2007: 8:33 AM EDT

LONDON (Reuters) — Wary financial markets awaited a public appearance by European Central Bank chief Jean-Claude Trichet Monday after a German bank holed by the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis was sold.

Well there you go………a subprime torpedo……..Bwhahahaha

Comment by nhz
2007-08-27 07:33:45

no jitters at all, everything is contained :) The ECB will inflate away every subprime bank problem and I’m sure Trichet will make some new speeches to assure all the speculators that they are safe - carte blanche for every big player.

Besides, authorities like the Dutch minister of finance just assured us that there is NO subprime problem in Europe. We do have lots of 0-down I/O loans, 110/120% financing, liar loans, 6-10x income loans, homeowners with shaky credit records etc. but NO subprime. Dutch home prices can only go up so there is no risk in these products and if something goes wrong, the government can always increase the free starter loans. My neighbour city got inspired by the US troubles apparently and preemptively upped the free loans with another 30.000 euro; they are very proud of this and I’m sure the local RE mob is happy too.

The big difference with the US is that in most EU countries when the housing bubble bursts it will be savers (think bank runs), local government (taxpayers), the tax office and government mortgage insurance funds (2x taxpayers) holding the bag, and not foreign speculators.

Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2007-08-27 08:33:11

It’s …”normalized”, it’s…”stabilized”, and it’s…”contained” …. babeeeeeeeeeeeee :-)

 
 
 
Comment by Sic Semper Realtor
2007-08-27 05:59:02

Wow, lots of “Get Rich on Foreclosures” infomercials on this weekend, coupled with an increase in pawn shop/lottery commercials. That’s a sure sign the economy is about to take off…right?

Comment by daniel
2007-08-27 06:14:53

yeah it’s gonna take off…….with an anchor around its neck. there ain’t no gettin’ out of this one, in spite of all the mini bailouts. i’m saying that the 200K home will be worth about 110K.
maybe……..yep, it’s THAT ef’in bad.

 
Comment by Curt
2007-08-27 06:59:11

That’s a sure sign the economy is about to take off…right?

Beats me. I’m going to make a forturne selling my stuff on EBay! The guy says I can’t go wrong!!

Comment by speedingpullet
2007-08-27 08:14:55

I was doing a lot of driving around the SF valley and Hollywood this weekend, and noticed an amazing amount of Garage/Yard/Moving sales last weekend.

Some streets had sales every other house, on both sides of the street.

Seriously, on one drive from Van Nuys to Los Feliz on saturday, I saw at least 50 sales, or signs for them.

Guess ’stuff’ is the first to go when things get tight.

 
 
 
Comment by droog
2007-08-27 06:15:56

I am sick and tired of the media giving us subliminal messages to “buy now” despite all the negative information that is coming out of the housing market.

Fr’instance, Linda Rawls, who is a business reporter for the Palm Beach Post, quoted a mortgage broker as saying,

Thinking of buying a house in the 12 to 18 months? If so, says mortgage broker Jim Sahnger of Palm Beach Financial Network in Sewall’s Point, “I would recommend acting sooner rather than later,” he said.

“What good would it serve to be able to buy a home for 5 percent to 10 percent less if you can’t qualify for a mortgage?”

For conforming loans, Sahnger said, “great credit is always welcome, but OK credit can still put you in a home with good interest rates,” he said.

And don’t wait for what you think will be the bottom as far as home prices go, he said.

“No one expected the unwinding we saw in Alt-A and jumbo loans, which demonstrates how quickly things can deteriorate. It’s better to act with what you know, not what you hope for.”

Note the clever “buy now” insinuation?

Here’s the email I sent her:

Dear Linda:

I enjoy reading your column in the Business section of the Post, but today I have to take exception with the financial advice your column provided.

You quote Jim Sahnger, a mortgage broker at Palm Beach Financial Network as saying, “I would recommend acting sooner rather than later” with regard to a home purchase. You further quote, “What good would it serve to be able to buy a home for 5 percent to 10 percent less if you can’t qualify for a mortgage?”

A prospective borrower may not qualify for a mortgage if they have insufficient down payment, an imperfect credit history, or inadequate income. This describes a person who is not ready to buy a home, and who may in fact be damaged were they able to buy a home. Home ownership is an expensive proposition that does not end when escrow closes. There are repair and maintenance costs, insurance and property taxes to be paid. In fact, the “subprime explosion” we have witnessed over the last 6 months arose because lenders gave money to people who were in no financial position to buy a home.

If home prices decline over the next year or two, today’s buyer will quickly find herself underwater. A medical emergency, job loss or transfer, or divorce puts the buyer at risk of foreclosure. Bear in mind that the 5-10 percent projected decline is a drop in median price, which is more a reflection of the availability of money; actual home prices will probably decline 20-40 percent in order to “revert to the mean” of typical affordability, which is three times household income (in Palm Beach County, this would be around $180,000).

So, arguably, in the face of declining prices, it is the worst time to buy a home, especially if you are a marginal buyer.

Why is it that those who most ardently advocate that “now is the time to buy” are those who stand to profit in fees and commissions? If now is the time to buy, why are most of the real estate agents and mortgage brokers I know selling their houses?

You further quote Mr. Sahnger as saying, “No one expected the unwinding we saw in Alt-A and jumbo loans…” This is patently untrue. I have been a member of blogs, such as the housing bubble blog (http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/) which, since early 2005, has been projecting just this very occurrence. In fact, it is only the media that have drawn a distinction between subprime and Alt-A; in actuality, Alt-A loans are as rife with fraud, inflated income and asset claims, and ARM resets as subprime. If Mr. Sahnger did not expect this unwinding, perhaps you should question his qualifications to give financial advice.

When will the Post stop serving its advertisers’ interests, and start paying heed to its readers’ interests?

Comment by Kris
2007-08-27 08:49:18

Excellent response!

 
Comment by M.B.A.
2007-08-27 09:11:11

Bravo!

 
Comment by manraygun
2007-08-27 09:37:34

Yes, well done.

 
Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-08-27 10:06:40

Way to go! Set those shill enablers straight!

 
Comment by Moman
2007-08-27 12:10:19

“No one expected the unwinding we saw in Alt-A and jumbo loans, which demonstrates how quickly things can deteriorate. It’s better to act with what you know, not what you hope for.”

How true. I know that housing prices are declining, so I better buy a house before the price drops any further, so it’s worth more when I sell since I bought at a higher price, and as a common dolt, I’ll be bragging about owning the most expensive home in the neighborhood.

What an idiot.

 
 
Comment by Captain Credit Crunch
2007-08-27 06:18:08

+1 laid off: Alberto Gonzales

Okay, okay, I guess his spot will be filled. But still! Having to resort to salary savings to fund the GWOT…

Comment by polly
2007-08-27 10:17:08

He was quoted as saying that his worst day as attorney general was better than his father’s best day as…I think it was an agricultural worker.

You know, I’m not sure I buy that. As back breaking. tiring, and poorly paid as working on a farm is, I bet his father was a proud to support his family with an honest day’s work and see that his son was doing well in school and likely to go far. Alberto Gonzales was well dressed, well sheltered and well fed during his worst days as attorney general, but if he wasn’t ashamed of himself, he wasn’t paying attention. Being ashamed of yourself is nothing to be excited about.

Comment by John Law(Duke of Arkansas)
2007-08-27 11:54:49

I agree polly. the only question is will he get a medal leaving office?

 
Comment by Jayne
2007-08-27 16:08:49

I noticed that comment, too. My mother picked cotton in the fields in south Alabama, but I would never say that my worst days (as a privileged academic) were better than her best days. To say that the well-to-do are always happier than the poor is arrogant IMHO.

 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2007-08-27 07:21:38

drop foreseen in median home price:

The median price of American homes is expected to fall this year for the first time since federal housing agencies began keeping statistics in 1950.

Economists say the decline, which could be foreshadowed in a widely followed government price index to be released this week, will probably be modest — from 1 percent to 2 percent — but could continue in 2008 and 2009. Rather than being limited to the once-booming Northeast and California, price declines are also occurring in cities like Chicago, Minneapolis and Houston, where the increases of the last decade were modest by comparison.

http://tinyurl.com/37tvks

Comment by nyc-is-different
2007-08-27 10:17:49

“from 1 percent to 2 percent”.

I love these tiny, cute, little price drops e-con-omists predict. Aw, they’re so adorable.

Comment by Ghostwriter
2007-08-27 12:41:48

That’s why there’s “con” in economist.

 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2007-08-27 07:37:44

jumbo loan trouble:

The evening before their home purchase was to close, Gary Becker and his wife, Amy Dacus, learned their mortgage to buy a Woodinville home had evaporated.

Unlike subprime borrowers defaulting on loans, the couple had a stellar credit score, a 20 percent down payment, strong employment history and had effortlessly purchased three prior homes.

http://tinyurl.com/25q5vh

Comment by txchick57
2007-08-27 07:41:11

Why do people with little kids like that feel compelled to yoke themselves to a three quarters of a million dollars of debt? What horrible thing would happen if they rented a place for a year?

Comment by Chrisusc
2007-08-27 08:59:43

Agreed. We have been renting now since this thing started (in CA that was in 2002/2003). And I am pretty sure that my daughter is not permanently scarred from the experience.

Comment by M.B.A.
2007-08-27 09:13:01

Babies and little kids like smaller places. Really - they don’t care !!!! In fact, they’d rather their parents be close by than in a separate wing of a McMansion….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-08-27 11:58:20

“Why do people with little kids like that feel compelled to yoke themselves to a three quarters of a million dollars of debt?”

I don’t know but that senior business analyst for Microsoft title might have had something to do with it.

 
Comment by Ghostwriter
2007-08-27 12:50:40

I seriously doubt that 3/4 of mil would buy a McMansion in Seattle. Three years ago I had a friend whose son worked for Microsoft in Seattle. He sold his 1200sf plain ranch for $650k. I think they were more concerned about losing the $15k earnest money if they didn’t perform on the contract. However with the falling market in Seattle the sellers should be a little leniant and give them a few weeks to find alternate financing, unless they already have another buyer lined up.

 
Comment by michael
2007-08-27 14:15:00

Maybe college aid packages. I guess some people start planning for that early. The Financial Planners that I know encourage you to load up on debt for tax and other benefits. These guys advise upper middle-class folks and you see some otherwise very bright people doing what appears to be obviously dumb.

I’m surprised that Microsoft’s relo department didn’t help him out.

 
 
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2007-08-27 07:48:47

What is their debt? Could they fully document that strong employment history? What is the debt/income ratio. If they would be under 3 even with this purchase, I don’t think this loan would be an issue.

Who cares if they could get loans using the “fog a mirror” test of the last 5 years.

 
Comment by Joe Schmoe
2007-08-27 08:40:45

Because they are STUPID. I have little kids too, and I am renting. It bothers me, but a $750,000 mortgage would bother me even more.

It’ll be interesting in a few years. We should be able to purchase a house 2-4 years from now, but we’ll pay 60-70% less than the neighbors paid. Some of our kids’ schoolmates will still be living in condos that their foolish parents paid $500,000 for at the height of the boom. It’ll be like “keep up with the Jonses” in reverse. That’ll be one of the most surreal aspects of this bubble.

Comment by Ghostwriter
2007-08-27 12:54:25

Excesses of the 80’s turned into conservative spending in the the beginning of the 90’s, turned into keep up with the Jones from the late 90’s until 2006. I guess we’re ready for a belt tightening phase again.

 
 
 
Comment by packman
2007-08-27 07:40:40

NAR report on existing home sales - declined .2% vs. June. The rate vs. expectations depends on who you ask:

http://tinyurl.com/ypkbzb

The National Association of Realtors reported that sales by homeowners slipped to an annual rate of 5.75 million in the month, down 0.2 percent from the revised 5.76 million pace in June. Economists surveyed by Briefing.com had forecast the sales rate would fall to 5.7 million in the latest reading.

http://tinyurl.com/29vw2a

The National Association of Realtors’ report on U.S. home sales, due out at 10 a.m. EDT, is projected to show sales rose 0.1 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.76 million units, from 5.75 million units in June, according to the consensus forecast of Wall Street economists surveyed by Thomson/IFR.

 
Comment by ozajh
2007-08-27 07:41:42

The July Existing Home Sales numbers show little change from June, either in sales or in prices. YOY sales down 9%.

Inventories are interesting, though. Up another 5% to the highest sales multiple since 1991.

Comment by PoodlePoodle
2007-08-27 08:07:07

I’m so conflicted. Existing home sales are up 1% in the NE (I’m not sure if this is YoY or MoM) but new home sales are down 23%.

Comment by Neil
2007-08-27 08:25:40

There is a difference in how they’re recorded. New homes sales happen when they go under contract. Existing home sales are recorded when the contract closes. Thus, Existing home sales are in fact a two month lagging indicator behind new home sales.

Also be sure to compare YOY. Comparing July to June is not applicable in most areas. Where I live, June is always stronger than July; but that might not be your local condition.

Go to calculatedrisk (on blogspot) for more information. That’s one of the best housing blogs. She’ll spend today going over the July housing numbers; expect some tidbits that the MSM overlooked to be brought to the light of day.

Inventories are getting interesting. Excluding some seasonal downturns, I do not see them going down for a year. ;) (So YOY should be up everywhere.) Patience… lots of it.

Got Popcorn?
Neil

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 09:40:27

A 5% rate of increase over one month translates into a projected 14.4 month doubling time (rule of 72: 72/5 = 14.4 mos). Of course since the credit crunch’s effect is yet to show up in existing home sales numbers, we might expect an even larger existing home inventory pop for August.

 
 
Comment by Wrenter
2007-08-27 07:44:10

This made me LIVID when I read it in Friday’s North County Times:

http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2007/08/24/perspective/16_30_348_18_07.txt

“We also know that prices have declined somewhat, but that contrary to several devastating projections by the Eastern press, home prices are not going to drop 40 percent, or 30 percent or 20 percent or even 10 percent. In the recession of the early 1990s, the average home price declined only 5 percent.”

How are they allowed to lie like this? That is not an opinion, he’s stating a “fact”. And speaking of this, I work for an investment advisor, so everything, and I mean EVERYTHING we send to clients has to be approved by our complaince office and contain a minimum of a half page of disclaimers and legalese. So why can the REIC get away with this? Why do I see ads on Craigslist that say, “Hurry buy now because the market is going to turn in 2008″???

If one good thing comes out of this shakeout, I hope it is that real estate agents will be bound by fiduciary duty and not allowed to lie deceive, dupe, mislead, etc etc.

/rant off/

Comment by M gal
2007-08-27 12:01:59

This must be the new NAR line. It also appeared in this story in the Flathead Beacon (NW MT) this weekend:

“As bad news pounds the national real estate market, Montana, while taking some punches, has proven to have a tough chin.
The pace of second-quarter existing home sales fell in 44 states – including by 7.1 percent in Montana – compared to the same time in 2006, according to numbers released last week by the National Association of Realtors. But NAR spokesperson Walter Molony put the Big Sky state’s apparent woes in perspective:

“‘You’re in pretty good shape.’ He pointed to places like Florida, where sales have slowed by more than 40 percent, and Nevada, which is not far behind, when studying the Montana market. He said areas that have seen population and job growth accompanied by a steady increase in housing prices – rather than several years of 20 percent gains – are faring better than much of the country.

“Montana, and the Flathead Valley, fits that criteria. The first quarter of 2007, when markets slowed elsewhere, the pace of home sales in Montana was the best ever. And the lag this quarter perhaps looks worse than it should because it’s being compared to the second-best quarter ever. In Northwest Montana, the number of homes sold in July was down slightly from last year, but the median price of homes still ballooned from $200,000 to $246,500, according to the Northwest Montana Association of Realtors.”

Note there NAR guy is not telling us how far MT will fall — just that it won’t be 40%.

Here’s my favorite part of the new talking points: “‘Go back east and in metro areas the market is certainly on a downward slope,’ Dykstra said. ‘We’re not seeing that. If we get into a situation where we have four or five years of inventory then we have a problem.’ Right now, he estimated, the area has between 23 and 27 months of inventory.”

My, how expectations have fallen. Two years of inventory is now something to feel good about.

http://www.newwest.net/index.php/city/article/montana_tip_toes_around_housing_lull/C8/L8/

 
Comment by Ghostwriter
2007-08-27 12:57:18

If one good thing comes out of this shakeout, I hope it is that real estate agents will be bound by fiduciary duty and not allowed to lie deceive, dupe, mislead, etc etc.

They are bound, but no one is going after them for violating it. Consumers can do that and they can actually lose their license. Most of them are probably betting consumers don’t know this.

Comment by Wrenter
2007-08-27 13:37:10

I had no idea they were bound in that way! You sure couldn’t tell from all the BS some of them spout :)

 
 
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2007-08-27 17:34:02

Thanks for posting this. Gave me a chance to vent a little rage and I am feeling much better. :D Maybe not feeling too adult but definitely much better.

 
 
Comment by exeter
2007-08-27 07:45:05

http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=bondsNews&storyID=2007-08-27T141209Z_01_N26404811_RTRIDST_0_USA-ECONOMY-HOUSING-URGENT-CORRECTED.XML

The pace of U.S. existing home sales in July fell slightly to a 5.75 million unit annual rate and the supply of unsold single-family homes hit its highest since 1991, the National Association of Realtors said in a report on Monday.

Total existing home sales, which include condominiums, fell 0.2 percent in July from an upwardly revised 5.76 million seasonally adjusted annual rate in June, first reported as 5.75 million.

The inventory of homes for sale rose 5.1 percent to 4.59 million, representing 9.6 months worth of supply at the current sales pace.

Economists polled ahead of the report were expecting home resales to drop to a 5.70 million-unit pace.

Median home prices fell 0.6 percent from a year ago to $228,900.

 
Comment by westwood
2007-08-27 07:57:35

Does anyone know the results of the auction that was held in LA yesterday?
I was going to attend for amusements sake (had my eye on one of the downtown properties, but the minimum bid was still twice what I’d pay) but I got pulled out of town at the last minute.

 
Comment by Shake
2007-08-27 08:08:24
Comment by nyc-is-different
2007-08-27 10:30:28

Actually it’s the revelation of the flips and scams committed by Wall St., the N.A.R. and others that is causing the decline.

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2007-08-27 08:48:47

Interesting article about a home price index for the City of Philadelphia put out by a Wharton prof. They have a big real estate economics program there.

http://www.hallwatch.org/news/1187886945532

What I found interesting is the comparison between asking prices and the selling price for the diminished number of transactions still occuring.

“Sellers remain resistant to the fact that buyers now have the upper hand, and still cling to 2005 and 2006 prices. We compared average list prices to average transaction prices, by Zip code, and found that the prices sellers want exceed the prices buyers are willing to pay by an average of 46%.”

Comment by phillygal
2007-08-27 11:41:01

As for prices, the conventional wisdom indicates that Philadelphia is due for a correction, but only a modest one. Research by both Hallwatch and independent sources indicate that Philadelphia’s housing is overvalued by approximately 15%. The most likely correction is that prices would decline by less than 15%, and then remain flat while rents and household incomes catch up.

me say 20%

Thanks for this link, WT. Some good facts and figures included. I can confirm the local sellers’ resistance to realistic pricing. I’ve seen condos for sale 5-10% higher than comps (going back six months).

The sellers’ wishing prices exceed buyers’ dream price by 46%? Hoo-hoo…maybe PHL RE correct more!

 
 
Comment by Hoz
2007-08-27 08:54:24

I like toys.

” Sailboat fetches only $9,000: A 41-foot sailboat, from which Exeter lawyer Stephen Woods presumably fell from then drowned, sold at auction Friday for $9,000 — $21,000 less than the estimated fair market value. The auction, held by the U.S. Marshal’s Service, was an effort to recover the approximately $25,000 it cost the crew of the fishing boat Amy Philbrick when it cut an October 2005 fishing trip short to assist with search and rescue efforts.”

This was/is a nice boat.

Lots of toys for sale, Jet skis, fishing boats, sedan cruisers and sailboats. None of last years buyers. Asking a lot, but no sales. The market is only told at the auctions.

Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-08-27 09:02:50

A while back Hoz you posted up the correlation between various cross rates and the S&P. Can you post those up again? Also what time frame did you use and over what period of time? Thanks.

Comment by Hoz
2007-08-27 09:15:44

CARRY TRADE?

EuroYen vs S&P500

3 months
time span can be adjusted to whatever period you envision
http://tinyurl.com/2lvgnp

Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-08-27 10:39:18

No. It has to do with the carrytrade but I thought you had posted up the correlation between the various currency trades with the S&P 500. Example correlations:

EURO/YEN =.85
USD/YEN=.80

Which I understood to mean that a change in the cross rate i.e. 1% decline in EURO vs. the YEN results in a 0.85% decline in the S&P 500. I thought you posted it up for a bunch of different currency combinations. Maybe I am wrong.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Hoz
2007-08-27 11:03:20

I don’t believe I would have posted it in that format. I know I posted the correlation of the EuroYen to the S&P500 as 0.94 with approximately a 6 hr time lag. But converting a correlation into a percentage drop can be very misleading.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Chrisusc
2007-08-27 09:03:09

Just watched Barbara Corcoran trying to pump and dump investment cond’s on Florida “rents are going up and prices are going down, its a great time for investors…”.

While it may soon be a good time for investors, I generally look for at least high teens to low twenty percent range cash-on-cash for condo investments as rentals. And in my neck of the woods (Scottsdale) we are still a long ways away from that coming to fruition.

 
Comment by Stephanie 81
Comment by walt526
2007-08-27 12:40:51

“The June 2006 reception was equally glitzy, captured, like the wedding, on video. Patti LaBelle serenaded Jackson, 39, a former exotic dancer turned mortgage broker, and her groom, Kurt Fordham, 38″

These punchlines just write themselves, don’t they?

 
 
Comment by are they crazy
2007-08-27 09:21:02

Our favorite RE shill continues to vomit nonsense:
“The rise in sales and prices in the Northeast region on a fairly consistent basis in recent months is promising because this was the first region that underwent sales and price weakness after the boom,” said Lawrence Yun, senior economist for the Realtors. “Now, it appears that it will be the first region to climb back, indicating that other regions could follow a similar path.”

Comment by exeter
2007-08-27 09:35:17

This guy is friggin’ clueless I don’t even know where to start. “The rising sales and prices in ‘recent’ months”? Does this jackass remember what he said about sales in april and june??? They were DOWN as are transaction prices.

Yun is another piece of $hit that belongs in a cell.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 09:37:36

Is Yun really as stoopid as his comments suggest, or does he just believe his audience is that stoopid?

 
Comment by arroyogrande
2007-08-27 09:57:48

Larry is calling the bottom…funny, I don’t remember him or David L. calling the top, when sales started looking “unpromising”.

I wonder why?

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 12:58:03

Bottom calling is a job duty for the chief NAR economist.

 
 
Comment by Ghostwriter
2007-08-27 13:02:55

“The rise in sales and prices in the Northeast region on a fairly consistent basis in recent months is promising because this was the first region that underwent sales and price weakness after the boom,”

I was not aware that the NE led the sales and pricing weakness. I thought if was FL, CA and NV.

 
 
Comment by Hoz
2007-08-27 09:26:46

BEIJING - A senior Chinese official said that 85 percent of the more than 20 million toys recalled by Mattel were caused by problematic designs from the US.

Li Changjiang, director of the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, told a press conference Monday that he examined samples of those recalled toys and found designing defects do exist in those products, which could easily hurt children.

He said those toys should be recalled, whatever country they have been exported to.

Chinese manufacturers are responsible for only 15 percent of the quality problems of the toys, he said.”
China Daily

 
Comment by ACH
2007-08-27 09:40:59

Gee, … I really don’t know what to say.
Roidy
http://tinyurl.com/ywtm4u

Comment by michael
2007-08-27 09:52:59

barbara corchran basically just said the housing market will not suck anymore when it stops sucking.

damn these people must eat retard sandwiches.

Comment by exeter
2007-08-27 10:27:43

“damn these people must eat retard sandwiches”

AMEN…… with musTurd….

 
 
 
Comment by Hoz
2007-08-27 09:42:46

“…The Financial Accounting Standards Board, the top U.S. accounting rules maker, also is focused on how banks value illiquid assets. “August 31 is coming up and we’ll have to see what happens,” FASB Chairman Robert Herz told Reuters last week. WRITE-DOWNS …”

Reuters

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 09:49:19

Did you ever see what happens to a hose with a high pressure nozzle pumping out water at a high rate when you let go of the nozzle? Take a look at the short-duration end of T-bond yield curve and you might notice a similarity (scroll down the page on the Bloomberg link):

http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates/index.html

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 09:52:29

One non-expert’s reading of the tea leaves:

1) The credit crunch is driving very short T-bond yields up again.

2) The market is discounting a recession with a bottoming out 2-3 years into the future.

3) Ancipated inflationary liquidity drops explain the monotonically increasing yields as a function of duration from three years out.

Comment by Hoz
2007-08-27 10:23:08

Prof, I would not consider the US treasuries to be indicating anything at this time. Money Market funds are scared and will only buy short term treasuries. I do not believe any firm wishes to be caught like Sentinel. The big assumption that you make is that this is a “credit crunch”, this is an insolvency crunch. Forgetting the stated Fed Fund rate of 5.25%, the overnight rate in the last week has been as low as 4.05% and averaged 4.96%. This is a Fed Fund rate cut in all but name. Individuals and the press have expressed the thought that Foreigners are buying US treasuries in a “flight to quality”, the data from the Federal Reserve shows that Foreign Central Banks are selling Treasuries. Foreign Central Banks are selling with good reason, there is a bid for the paper. If you wish to get out of a larger position, you sell when there is a bid.

I believe that TxChick wanted to have dinner with Mr. Rove, I would like to be at Jackson Hole and have dinner with Mssrs. Ben Bernanke, Charles Prince and Kenneth Lewis.

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 10:58:06

I was not making assumptions — just trying to come up with an explanation for why the short end of the T-bond yield curve was swinging up like a just-released fire hose.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 10:59:07

P.S. Please disambiguate “credit crunch” from “insolvency crunch,” as to my untutored understanding, they sound like one and the same.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Hoz
2007-08-27 11:10:36

Credit crunch - you have moneys and good prospects, but the bank has no moneys to loan for expansion.

Credit insolvency - you have no moneys and owe interest on your debt, but the bank won’t loan cuz your prospects are not so hot.

 
Comment by NYCresident
2007-08-27 11:49:00

The reason the “bank” has no money to loan for subprime mortgages, cdo’s, and certain asset backed cp is that the collateral is deemed at risk of major default (or insolvency). I don’t see any distinction between your credit crunch and credit insolvency in light of current market conditions. My understanding of the term “credit crunch” is when lendors don’t want to lend at any price (interest rate).

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-08-27 12:07:22

A huge difference, 75% of the debt outstanding is junk. Some of the debt will be paid in full, some will not be paid. Good companies are being lumped in with the bad companies.

Solvent, well run companies are not trying to find funds - interest rates are high - these companies are cutting back. The Federal Reserve has an open window policy and the companies that need the moneys cannot get the funding - these companies are credit stretched to the limit. Insolvency.

Main Street believes this to be the result of a few bad mortgages. $4T in corporate debt was repriced ~10% lower. This is a staggering loss. Somebody is sucking a lot of air.

Or think of a credit crunch as “I want to borrow a hundred dollars and the bank says fine but not ’til next month.” Lack of immediate cash.

Credit insolvency “I want to borrow a hundred and the bank says, who is your guarantor”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 12:56:39

Last crisis: subprime lending
Next up: covenant-lite lending?

 
Comment by NYCresident
2007-08-27 12:57:11

I guess I don’t understand the concept of an investor or bank saying I will buy your debt or lend you money next month. The fact is that the market for certain debt has seized up and market participants are hoping that it is a temporary condition, and that investors will part with their capital in a month or two. But investors are not commiting to buying CLOs or CDOs next month. Market commentators are just expressing our collective hope that the credit crunch dissipates in time.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 13:05:39

“I guess I don’t understand the concept of an investor or bank saying I will buy your debt or lend you money next month.”

“I’d gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.”

–Wimpy–

 
 
 
Comment by ajas
2007-08-27 10:42:31

Looks like a rate-cut to me.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 14:34:23

At the end of the day, the yield curve looks drastically contorted. It seems to be writhing violently in the blast furnace winds of the unfolding credit crisis.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 14:39:33

What’s up with the short end of the yield curve (again)? Big one-day moves up on the 3-mo and 6-mo yields (+27.5bps / + 25.4bps)… CRUNCH!

Bills
MATURITY DATE DISCOUNT/YIELD DISCOUNT/YIELD CHANGE TIME
3-Month 11/23/2007 4.38 / 4.50 -0.05 / .275 17:00
6-Month 02/21/2008 4.40 / 4.57 -0.11 / .254 16:25

Comment by Mike G
2007-08-27 16:35:11

Wild swings.
The six-month bill yield dropped from 4.91% to 4.09 last week, now back up to 4.77%.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen it move more than 0.1% in a week before now.

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 19:40:55

“I don’t think I’ve ever seen it move more than 0.1% in a week before now.”

Which brings us back to the uncontrolled fire hose analogy…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2007-08-27 09:50:42


Housing supply-demand

It is a safe bet that the months of inventory would reach 12 before 2007 is out.

Also, 2.2M increase in the inventory over the past 3 years is all due to the excess building, IMO. If that is the case then the excess supply per year was .73M. Since the Total Units Completed was at 1.9M annual rate for the past three years this gives us a demand rate of 1.17M per year and not 1.65-1.9M estimated by dismal scientists. All the actual data support demand to be in 1.15-1.30M annual rate. The demand for 1995-2010 would end up being 0.7M annual rate if there were to be a depression during 2008-10, led by housing related debt build up.

Jas

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 10:52:56

“…excess supply per year was .73M.”

My back-o-the-envelope estimate of a couple of days back suggests this rate of excess supply growth has recently tapered off to .511M — hardly enough to stop the slow-motion train wreck already in progress.

 
 
Comment by rainmayun
2007-08-27 10:03:09

Interesting front-page saga in the Sunday edition of Washinton Post about a couple that’s apparently on the run for large-scale mortgage fraud. Lots of lurid detail about their spending habits and the fact that the wife used to be a stripper. Fascinating to me that the Post is all on top of this real estate crash now, with articles on the topic almost daily, but a few months ago they were completely non-existent.

Prince George’s Fairy Tale Unravels For Woman at Center of Fraud Probe
By Keith L. Alexander and Ovetta Wiggins
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, August 26, 2007; Page A01

.
.
.
The price tag for the nuptials, Jackson told friends, was nearly $800,000.

It was a fairy tale wedding born of a booming real estate market. But even as Jackson was basking in her platinum wedding, her dreams and those of hundreds of homeowners in the Washington area were crumbling around them — just like the market.

Investigators and attorneys say it appears that Jackson paid for her wedding and her lavish lifestyle, in part, with money from an elaborate foreclosure rescue business she operated out of her Lanham-based Metropolitan Money Store Corp.

 
Comment by lililegs
2007-08-27 10:23:45

OMG! I just had a realtor leave a calendar/marketing piece at my door. As someone who works in marketing, I had to ask, what the hell were they thinking with that name? I have a snap of the logo/contact info available at http://burnsautoparts.com/realtor.JPG –look at their URL and the terrible graphic which explains the name.

I guess on one level it could be considered truth in advertising. :-)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 10:50:33

CCB reveals $1.06bn subprime exposure
By Reuters Aug 27 04:38:50

China Construction Bank, one of the country’s big four state lenders, said it held US$1.062 billion worth of U.S. subprime mortgage loan-backed securities at the end of June and expects the securities to have ”limited impact” on its operating results for the year.

Analysts said the U.S. subprime exposure to Construction Bank was manageable, because it only accounted for about 2.5 per cent of its equity, and the company’s shares jumped 4 per cent on Monday amid a broad market rally.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e8cde7e2-5456-11dc-9a6e-0000779fd2ac.html

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-08-27 11:18:13

Mr. James Grant wrote an OP-Ed piece in yesterdays NYT.

“Capitalism without financial failure is not capitalism at all, but a kind of socialism for the rich. In any case, to all of us, rich and poor alike, the Fed owes a pledge that it will do what it can and not do what it can’t. High on the list of things that no human agency can, or should, attempt is manipulating prices to achieve a more stable and prosperous economy. Jiggling its interest rate, the Fed can impose the appearance of stability today, but only at the cost of instability tomorrow.”

The “appearance of stability today”, a phrase worth remembering.

Comment by Jas Jain
2007-08-27 11:42:07


Poor James Grant. Who listens to prudes during these bubble years? Manipulators are in-charge and they will manipulate to the death, I mean death of the system that allowed these manipulators the power.

Jas

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 11:47:58

The Fed can impose the appearance of prosperity today, but only at the cost of greater impoverishment tomorrow.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 11:46:24

IT WORKS!!!

Keeping the faith
These home selling tactics may be unconventional, but some swear by them
By Amy Hoak, MarketWatch
Last Update: 4:06 PM ET Aug 24, 2007

CHICAGO (MarketWatch) — Tammy Winfield made every effort to depersonalize her home and keep it free of clutter. She even baked cookies before prospective buyers came in for a look, hoping that the homey scents would help persuade them to make an offer.

Still, the Truckee, Calif., home that she and her husband, Bill, put on the market in September sat for months without any takers.
“We were getting a lot of showings, but not many offers,” she said


Then, in February, they took some home-selling advice — and a leap of faith.

At the suggestion of their Realtor, Brandi Benson, they brought in a stager who refocused the home using the concepts of feng shui. Tammy Winfield also addressed the reasons why she was having a tough time detaching from the home, possibly causing buyers to stay away.
And then there was the little matter of burying a statue of St. Joseph in the yard, a ritual she learned about from her Catholic friends.

The couple closed on the sale of their home in March.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/desperate-home-sellers-swear-these/story.aspx?guid=%7B0DED7385%2D6B84%2D4760%2DB967%2D840CDD7B7F7E%7D

 
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2007-08-27 14:01:48

Wonder how real estate is doing in this part of Tayhoss?

Drug cartels put hit squads in Laredo

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070827/ap_on_re_us/border_drug_violence

Comment by Mike G
2007-08-27 16:30:34

One more factor to consider — don’t buy in ‘marginal’ city neighborhoods, or neighborhoods that have moved up from gangland in the last decade or so.
Economic downturns will hit local governments, which will reduce municipal services, including police. Combine that with rising unemployment and demographic trends, and we could see substantial ‘de-gentrification’ in some areas.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 14:41:05

Credit-card defaults on rise in US
By Saskia Scholtes in New York
Published: August 27 2007 19:02 | Last updated: August 27 2007 19:02

US consumers are defaulting on credit-card payments at a significantly higher rate than last year, raising the prospect of problems in the stricken US subprime mortgage market spreading to other types of consumer debt.

Credit-card companies were forced to write off 4.58 per cent of payments as uncollectable in the first half of 2007, almost 30 per cent higher year-on-year. Late payments also rose, and the quarterly payment rate – a measure of cardholders’ willingness and ability to repay their debt – fell for the first time in more than four years.

Analysts at Moody’s, the rating agency, said the trend could be related to the slowdown in the US property market and a fall in the number of borrowers rolling their mortgage debt into new and cheaper home loans.

The combination of higher interest rates and a softer real estate market diminished the attractiveness of mortgage refinancings in which many borrowers reduced their more expensive credit-card debt by drawing on the equity in their home,” Moody’s said.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b6e7caf4-54c4-11dc-890c-0000779fd2ac.html

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-08-27 14:46:31

Filings Rising
Business-Bankruptcy Blues
Edited by ROBIN GOLDWYN BLUMENTHAL

IF THE FED WANTS EVIDENCE of a slowing economy, it need look no further than the pace of business bankruptcies.

For the second quarter, such bankruptcies rose 38% from the same quarter in 2006, and first-half bankruptcies were up a full 45% from the 2006 half, to 12,985. That’s according to Euler Hermes ACI, an accounts-receivable insurer that’s part of Allianz. It derives its data from the U.S. Bankruptcy Courts.

The pace of business bankruptcies tracked consumer-bankruptcy filings, with the latter up 48%, to 391,105, for the first half, says the American Bankruptcy Institute.

“Deflation of the housing bubble has caused a major drag on the economy,” says Daniel C. North, Euler Hermes’ chief economist.

http://online.barrons.com/article/SB118741413147401850.html?mod=googlenews_barrons

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post