October 10, 2007

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For October 10, 2007

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

348 Comments »

Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 04:34:02

“There is a difference between our strike and all those you’ve practiced for centuries: our strike consists, not of making demands, but of granting them. We are evil, according to your morality. We have chosen not to harm you any longer. We are useless, according to your economics. We have chosen not to exploit you any longer. We are dangerous and to be shackled, according to your politics. We have chosen not to endanger you, nor to wear the shackles any longer. We are only an illusion, according to your philosophy. We have chosen not to blind you any longer and have left you free to face reality — the reality you wanted, the world as you see it now, a world without mind.”

John Galt

Comment by watcher
2007-10-10 04:50:06

Who is John Galt?

Comment by walt526
2007-10-10 05:36:08

19th century Scottish novelist and colonizer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Galt_%28novelist%29

Comment by manhattanite
2007-10-10 06:11:13

i don’t think that’s the john galt
aladinsane is referring to!

he is referencing the john galt of ayn rand’s novel “atlas shrugged,” who after being dissed by the idiots of the world, decided to take off and start his own community of true thinkers, innovators and doers, and then told the rest of the world to fark off and see if they could live without him and the others of the world who truly make things happen in a great speech expressing his creed of invention and originality and risk and creation of value, thus causing the idiots to respond: “who is john galt?”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 07:16:06

Ayn Rand couldn’t have dreamed that the meeting place would be in cyberspace, but here we are…

 
 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2007-10-10 05:56:59


“He means don’t ask questions no one can answer.”!

“Yes, Miss Taggart.”

 
Comment by manhattanite
2007-10-10 06:04:11

BWAHAAAAAAAA!!!

[:+)~

 
Comment by Johnny B. Good
2007-10-10 09:09:10

I think Watcher may be making a funny.

 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-10-10 04:50:06

There’s nothing quite as inspiring as helplessness and despair.

Comment by Jas Jain
2007-10-10 05:59:24


Joey,

You need to read Atlas Shrugged to understand the meaning.

Jas

Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-10-10 06:27:02

Many of you are always commenting about Atlas Shrugged and Ayn Rand so this past summer I purchased We The Living, Fountainhead, and Atlas Shrugged to see what the hub bub is about.

I am reading Rand’s books in the chronological order they were written to understand her development. Just finished We The Living over this past weekend. Great book. Highly recommended.

I don’t appreciate the Atlas Shrugged endorsers failing to mention the book (softback) is 1,070 pages in micro-type (about 60% the size of normal type used in softbacks). High probability I may blow my eyes on that one. If I get through a 1,000 page book which should really be a 2,000 page and it sux, I’m going to be pissed!

So far thanks for the exposure.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 06:33:07

Makes a heckova doorstop, when you’re done reading it.

The Fountainhead is wonderful, Enjoy~

 
Comment by guess who's
2007-10-10 06:35:05

You can get it on audiobook and listen while driving…kills two birds with one stone.

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2007-10-10 06:41:27

I believe this book is helping to support a cinder block by keeping one of the holes dust free in my parents basement. I read everything else in the house, but never managed to yank this one out. Possibly afraid of dropping it on my foot. I don’t know if this storage location indicates a conscious editorial decision, or whether it merely came with the house 40 years ago…

 
Comment by LILLL
2007-10-10 07:57:25

Loved both Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. Read em in High School. lengthy yes, but well worth the read.

 
Comment by are they crazy
2007-10-10 08:15:54

I read them in high school also - we’re showing our age. I can’t imagine these being taught in most high schools today.

 
Comment by GeorgeSalt
2007-10-10 08:22:48

It’s been said that one must be exposed to Rand during adolescence in order to get hooked. I didn’t read Rand until my 30s. About 40 pages into The Fountainhead I remember thinking to myself “there is really something psychologically off about this author.” Everything I subsequently learned about her life confirmed this bit of intuition. Murray N. Rothbard nicely summed up Rand and her movement:

“Thus, power - not liberty or reason - was the central thrust of the Randian movement. The major lesson of the history of the movement to libertarians is that It Can Happen Here, that libertarians, despite explicit devotion to reason and individuality, are not exempt from the mystical and totalitarian cultism that pervades other ideological as well as religious movements.”

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 08:23:15

That’s the difference.

We Read.

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-10-10 09:09:10

while cults are often born of worthy ideas, worthy ideas are never born of cults.

 
Comment by MaryLee
2007-10-10 17:48:59

alad….

One of the best gifts I’ve ever received was a video set of “We The Living”…..in Italian ….. starring Rosanno Brazzi. It was filmed in Italy shortly after WW2…. Astonishing rendition….

Saw Rand at Reed College….like almost 50 years ago!! She shredded the hecklers.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 19:32:10

MaryLee…

She was a force to be reckoned with~

Only just now again, can hecklers be silenced by using our intellect against them, in a decidedly one way battle…

We The Living,

against

Those that post twice, but think not much.

 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-10-10 06:35:26

i know.. it doesn’t make sense..
I posted too soon.. should have waited until this thread has played itself out and inserted my comment at the end..

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 06:43:20

is there something you want to tell us, joey?

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 06:52:25

p.s.

Galt, California

pretty much sucks.

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-10-10 07:15:44

Galt Calif. was named after Galt Ontario.. which was named after Galt the writer.

 
 
Comment by cassiopeia
2007-10-10 13:10:51

I read that Allen Greenspan is a big fan of Ayn Rand, he actually belonged to her inner circle at one time. That kind of turned me off reading her, but I will some day. The audiobook thing is a good idea.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by dan
2007-10-10 16:06:53

read a couple chapters. if you don’t like it after that, put it away and forget about it. but the book is definitely worth reading. even if you don’t agree with AR on everything, you’ll prob enjoy the book.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Gatorfan
2007-10-10 06:13:58

It’s actually interesting that you would post that here considering how the housing bubble with always be linked to Objectivism, albeit indirectly.

Alan Greenspan, the architect (sorry Howard Rourk) of the housing bubble, was one of Ayn Rand’s inner circle and has written many articles for Objectivist publications including, Rand’s “Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal.”

There’s even a book ironically titled, “Alan Shrugged: Alan Greenspan, the World’s Most Powerful Banker.”

Here’s the link:

http://www.amazon.com/Alan-Shrugged-Greenspan-Worlds-Powerful/dp/047139906X/

Does that change Galt’s monologue any?

Comment by manhattanite
2007-10-10 06:19:44

well, i guess it could be argued that for every john galt there are ten thousand FBs and an equal number of GFs!

 
Comment by watcher
2007-10-10 06:43:13

Greenspan sold his soul to the devil, and totally reversed all his positions (on gold, for example).

 
Comment by Deron
2007-10-10 06:54:46

Greenspan did dally with Objectivism for a while. But he apparently went back to his first love - Socialism once he was in charge of the Fed.

I’m a long way from an Objectivist myself but to try to connect Greenspans actions as head of the Fed to that philosophy is Groucho Marx for the Great Purge.

Comment by Deron
2007-10-10 06:58:31

Should read:

“is like blaming Groucho Marx for the Great Purge.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by packman
2007-10-10 07:00:03

Judas was part of Jesus’ inner circle as well.

I’m just sayin’

Comment by Gatorfan
2007-10-10 11:44:06

Nice.

Now I feel better about being a Rand fan.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by peter m
2007-10-10 07:08:33

greetings Aladinsane,

i just got back fron a trip to sequoia NP and spent a night at the Best Western Holiday Lodge in Three Rivers. Cost $65.00, a bit high for an off season rate but far cheaper than Comfort inn. The Motel, run by an Indian Family, is on a large(10 acres?)parcel with a flood control dike behind it. There are a lot of lodges, inns, motels in TR’s such as Lazy J,gateway,comfort,sierra Lodge, ect. They will be hit hard as the recession unfolds.
There are too many Re/ Century 21 offices in TR’s, the unwinding of the RE specuation is evident-i saw plenty of sale signs along Generals highway/rte 190.
BTW off topic on RE but the Kawaeh lake is astoundingly low, something like 80-100 ft below normal level. It is basically a shriveled up lake now.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 07:53:37

I’ve been all over the High Sierra this year and usually the northern part gets more snow than the southern part, but both halves got bupkis this year.

Got in a fair amount of backpacking this summer, and as I tend to hang with backcountry friends a lot, based upon maybe 500 years of practical backpacking experience amongst 40 friends, the consensus was, this was a shocking year.

What partially saved this year, was the previous 2 years were fabulous (2005 was My Favorite Year ever) with excessive snowfall, and the way snow percolates through rock, eventually coming out in springs, meant those were the only sources of H20, after April!

Like a battery, these aquifers must be recharged, and another dodgy winter, and Water, which is normally oh so common in the higher climes, will be in lakes only.

C’est la eau

Comment by peter m
2007-10-10 17:05:25

When i was at lodgepole this weekend i did the hike along the silliman pass/twin lakes trail as a day hike and discovered a beat up ragged path along Silliman creek which i took up to where the creek does a sharp turn and encounters the first glacial headwall. Will do Sillman Peak as an overnight next time, though not till next year in early summer.
That is the best thing about the Sierras-those springs percolating out of rocks. Lots of memories of doing a long hot jaunt along a trail and coming upon a really cool gushing creek/spring.
BTW-The best diving pool in the lower Sierra Oak foothills is the one at Hospital Rock.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by peter m
2007-10-10 08:56:15

Just a note on the RE/ecomonic conditions in the Visalia/central valley Area. On the surface, things look normal but i was hearing reports on the radio shows out of the Central valley on poverty-families in distress and in need. Also, lots of crime and gang activity reported daily. Of course this is not much different than LA.

Comment by Gwynster
2007-10-10 10:31:11

Funny you mentioned this because a collegue emailed me about prelim data and her observations “Oakland moved to Sacramento and Sacramento moved to Kansas?” Her words and she’d dead-on. The PI of this project is going to publishing for years.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by bill in Maryland
2007-10-10 18:35:40

Extreme gang activity in the Central Valley is the norm. I lived in Fresno for 20 something years of my life. Moved out in 1985. How about 1,000 to 2,000 member gang fights? Never heard of in the local rags, but were heard of on police scanners. Central Valley.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Darrell_in _PHX
2007-10-10 10:38:54

This was the first summer since moving to AZ 5 years ago, that I didn’t make my annual visit to Sequoia. Got married and honeymooned in the Caribbean instead.

Kawaeh lake is always very low in the fall. Spring is when it is full. 18 months ago it was so full that you could barely see the tops of the trees along the banks. I truely don’t know how they stayed in the ground instead of ripping out of the gound and floating to the surface.

Yes, last winter was a dry winter in the Sierra Nevada, but a drought does not one year make. The year before there were warnign signs everywhere about how the rivers were so much more full than normal.

That said, yeah, I could imagine a lot of houses will be selling for very cheap. Personally, I’d much rather have a place outside the gate of Kings Canyon… forget the name of the little town just outside the gate. Then on the road up from Visalia.

Comment by peter m
2007-10-10 12:28:09

“That said, yeah, I could imagine a lot of houses will be selling for very cheap. Personally, I’d much rather have a place outside the gate of Kings Canyon… forget the name of the little town just outside the gate. Then on the road up from Visalia.”

There really is no village, just single shops/clusters of shops, all along the rte 180 going toward fresno as you descend from Kings Canyon/Grant Grove. Not till you hit the valley floor after driving almost 50 miles and nearly an hr do you come upon Squaw Valley, the first village/town-a small rather derelict agricultural township. I cannot find any residential RE plots anywhere along this rte till you hit valley floor.
Personally i like Three Rivers as a nice gateway village just outside the south Sequoia Park entrance, thou it does have an oversupply of tourist lodges and eateries/shops which seem to go repeatedly broke and close-reopen. The best most modern shopping place in town is the village market/Serranos Mex/Pizza Factory plaza. I would not buy any RE In TR’s till it hits rock bottom in 2008-2010.
BTW for all those unfamiliar with it Three Rivers is about 40 minites east of Visalia along the rte 190 general hwy to Sequoia NP-which is my all-time favorite hiking/camping spot.

More off-topic: The year 1994 was an especally wet season-i remember the Kings Canyon River was a raging torrent gushing nearly over the road. We could see a wet, stormy winter this year-i was caught in an early season snowfall up at lodgepole/Giant Forest and nearly skidded off the road. 2-3″ of snow fell oct 5th friday.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by CA renter
2007-10-11 03:03:34

Think you might be talking about Dunlap?

We’re in the process of selling some land in that area (very remote land). Keeping fingers crossed ’til escrow closes! :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by bill in Maryland
2007-10-10 18:32:48

Wow! I think I have 3 editions of “Atlas Shrugged.” Bought the last one a week ago at B & N in White Marsh. I read A.S. after reading “The Fountainhead.” I identified (and still do) more with Howard Roark than any character in A.S., although I loved A.S. I think my favorite was Ragnar Danneskjold. To this day, I buy gold bullion coins cash only and forget about the amount I paid (throw away the invoice). A.S. was what first got me interested in gold.

I was 20 when I picked up my first A.R. book in 1979. Ironically, I think the best non-fiction book from Ayn Rand’s “official” group is “The Objectivist Philosophy of Ayn Rand,” by Leonard Peikoff. It finally integrates the philosophy.

Every detractor of Ayn Rand in the peanut galleries I’ve encountered hated Objectivism because they hated Ayn Rand’s personality. They had nothing intelligent to say about the philosophy. Okay. I did not like her personality. I liked the message. Actually Objectivism is an extension (some say reiteration) of many works of the ancient Greeks (Aristotle, for example).

I am pleasantly surprised to see so many messages in favor of A.S. on a completely unrelated blog. This is probably one for the record books of those who keep track of “pop culture” and maybe not so pop-culture mentioning Ayn Rand.

 
 
Comment by Russell A
2007-10-10 04:35:30

Banks insist their credit problems are over. Why on earth do investors believe them?

Here’s a Daniel Gross article about the investment banks:
http://www.slate.com/id/2175557/

Comment by txchick57
2007-10-10 04:52:12

Because “investors” (who are mostly hedge funds and program traders now) have a vested interest , i.e., bonuses, in “believing” them, at least for a few more months. What the hell, it isn’t their money they are throwing at this market.

Comment by ACH
2007-10-10 05:13:34

That’s the problem! It isn’t their money. I keep hearing about “fundamentals of the market” as if it were some sort of mantra that makes all possible and comely. This is a slow moving wreck. I’m fascinated with all of this: housing bubble/bust, credit bubble, stock market, dollar, etc. It’s that you know a fall is going to happen, and surely people who are directly involved know it’s all going to decline sooner than later. No one can really get out, so they deny and spin. Now I’m reading about a credit card run up because of the house decline. Unreal.
Now, about St Joe Co. …
Roidy

Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 05:38:27

“Now, about St Joe Co. …”

Yes? Please comment, because I think the St. Joe situation is one of the more interesting tales of the bubble.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Devildog
2007-10-10 05:42:18

What’s to tell? They sell off their only means of production other than housing and then housing tanks. They should be a 101 college course on how to take a diversified successful company and destroy it in a few short years…

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 05:56:44

“They sell off their only means of production other than housing and then housing tanks.”

Interesting commentary and I wholeheartedly agree. When you hear officials in various state govs talking about how their state’s economy (like Florida) is dependent upon building and real estate, you know we’re in big trouble. For cripes sake, houses are just places to live, raise families, etc. You’ve got to have other means of employment and income. Now, for the Great Lakes states like Michigan, if I were a states’ rights government official, I’d be laying claim to the water up there and telling CA and AZ etc to stick it, or pay up in a big way. Water industry getting big. Could be a huge boon for the Great Lakes states, especially if they could find a way to replenish it.

 
Comment by flatffplan
2007-10-10 06:12:25

PHO nice water etf

 
Comment by Blano
2007-10-10 06:14:39

“Could be a huge boon for the Great Lakes states, especially if they could find a way to replenish it.”

That’s apparently becoming a problem. With Lake Superior down a number of feet in depth, the effect is working it’s way through all the other lakes. It’s affecting shipping in terms of reduced loads, lakefront property values when you can cut the grass around your dock, marinas, etc. And when water levels will head up again is anybody’s guess.

 
Comment by DC Renter
2007-10-10 06:20:04

I used to live in Southwood. Overall a very nice, well made St. Joe master planned community. If they had kept pricing where initially intended, they could have built for 40+ years at full speed in Tallahassee. But they (finally) jacked up prices just as the market was peaking and then low and behold, the insatiable demand disappears. Then they sign with Beazer to do all the actual construction. Their plans to build multiple “Seaside” like towns with similar profit margins only made sense in a bubble. Neat business model though, take 1000 acres of $5k acre land, set aside 900 as a nature preserve, sell the remaining 100 at $500K an acre (or something along those lines). Panama City will always be the “Redneck Rivera”. There just isn’t that much real money that wants to go on vacation in the woods and bring in all their own food.

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 06:30:23

I saw something about that recently, Blano. Weird. One guy was claiming that the water was being covertaly diverted or “stolen” to supply CA, AZ, and other southwestern states. Although it came off as tin foil hat, the other day I saw some proposal to tap the Great Lakes to divert water to the southwest and it made me go “hmm”. Although how something like that could be covered up I have no idea.

But it is not unheard of. Here in West Central Florida, Hillsborough and Pasco Counties made a deal with the devil back in the 1970s to supply Pinellas County. In recent years, the counties have wanted to withdraw from that agreement and Pinellas threatened to sue the peewadden out of them. In 2000, when I was looking for property up in Pasco, one of the realtors showing me around drove me past a few dry lake beds and started muttering under her breath about how Pasco was being “sucked dry” by Pinellas.

 
Comment by spike66
2007-10-10 06:31:49

The arid Southwest is in for an international fight if they want water from the Great Lakes,see below. The Lakes themselves are already at low levels, and folks who live around the Lakes have no interest in “sharing”. Remember those Texans with their “Freeze a Yankee” bumperstickers?
Expect to see “Let ‘em Die of Thirst” from those up north. Payback is a bitch.

“…signing on December 13, 2005, a historic agreement with Quebec and the eight Great Lakes states (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin) that share the basin with Ontario.
The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement establishes:
* A virtual ban on diversions
* A basin-wide environmental standard for water uses
* Better conservation measures
* An increased role for science in decision-making.
The basin-wide environmental standard will significantly increase the control of water uses in the Great Lakes states. There was previously no such standard.
http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/mnr/water/greatlakes/index.html

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 06:50:37

In lieu of moving the water, why not just move people to the water?

 
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2007-10-10 07:03:29

In lieu of moving the water, why not just move people to the water?

<californians>Flyover states are for exploiting, not for living</californians>

 
Comment by spike66
2007-10-10 07:14:01

Never happen, It gets cold up north, very cold. Could be the only thing that protects us from Californians.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 07:14:24

Mastering the Midwest accent will be a challenge for many a Californian…

 
Comment by Blano
2007-10-10 07:21:26

“In lieu of moving the water, why not just move people to the water?”

Lots of people don’t like the idea of that liquid becoming a solid for part of the year. As spike mentioned, there may be something to be said for that.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 07:26:37

They’ll just have to perish of thirst somewhere else, perish the thought.

 
Comment by cactus
2007-10-10 07:32:12

have you read “Cadillac Desert” about the water , the west and the big government programs that were created and didn’t know when to quit.

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-10-10 07:32:14

Bad enough with the FIBs, but now Californicators.

First I’ll get my realtors license…. oooh start some lovely condos overlooking Superior..

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 07:41:30

Yes, well, google could move their operations to the Great Lakes region and that would revive the area. Why not?

 
Comment by In Colorado
2007-10-10 07:42:14

> The arid Southwest is in for an international fight if they want water from the Great Lakes,see below.

How would they get that water to Cali? They would have to pump it thousands of miles and over the Rockies.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 07:42:25

The Californians are coming the Californians are coming

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060921/
(my very first drive in movie, that I remember being at)

 
Comment by ET-chicago
2007-10-10 07:45:01

Never happen, It gets cold up north, very cold. Could be the only thing that protects us from Californians.

I tell people that Chicago winters keep all the pussie$ out. I’m only half-joking.

I’m late to the water rights discussion, but suffice to say that the Great Lakes states are extremely aware of the value of our fresh water (and concerned about the drop in lake levels). It won’t go cheaply so arid states can build golf courses, that’s for sure.

I’m also encouraged that the states and big cities around the lakes are becoming more aggressive about defending the watersheds from pollution and corporate exploitation. A little late to the game, but better late than never.

 
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2007-10-10 07:59:55

Yes indeed. I should remind Californians that I wished I had a winter jacket on as I walked to work this morning. It was in the upper 40s… Three days removed from a day in which the Chicago Marathon was stopped early due to heat that was causing runners to drop like flies. 300+, and 1 died (turned out to be a heart condition that was likely aggravated by the heat).

 
Comment by 45north
2007-10-10 08:00:35

Spike66: The two Canadian provinces and the eight US states like the Great Lakes just the way they are, thank you very much. Besides, the water wants to go downhill! Despite the cold, Americans in the south-west will come north.

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 08:00:39

Where there’s a will, there’s a way, especially if there’s money in it. Think of the payday! All those jobs, moving the earth, blasting the rock, manufacturing the equipment, moving the equipment, people guarding the pipelines, land to be bought up, the lawyers for the lawsuits that would surely come about, the profit for the utilities, etc., etc., ad nauseum, amen.

Now, that’s how it is done. Why do you think we use oil, gas, hydroelectric, etc. instead of Tesla’s brilliant and inexpensive plan to tap the magnetic field for power (in Colorado, by the way). Imagine how different the US would be. No oil spills. No pipelines. No shipping costs. No Middle East wars. No Exxon, Chevron, et al to hold us hostage. Far less pollution. No worrying about utilities being shut off.

And imagine all the losers if we were to transition to that system right now. No having to live under the threat of nuclear plant meltdowns or sabotage.

But oh, no. We’re in the last hours of ancient sunlight (oil) and now we MUST have nuclear, not the simple, safe, clean, renewable alternative that Tesla came up with so long ago and that Westinghouse (dang his soul forever) put the kibosh on. No, we MUST have something that, if there’s ever an accident or an attack, will make the Exxon Valdez oil spill look like the dog piddled on the floor. But think of the money and the employment!!

 
Comment by Blano
2007-10-10 08:10:20

Same here, Brian….90 degrees Monday afternoon, 49 degrees this morning. Lots of folks wouldn’t appreciate that.

 
Comment by veloblues
2007-10-10 08:20:18

Reminds me of Sam Kinison:

“See this? It’s sand. Nothing grows in sand. You’re starving because you live in the middle of a ****ing desert! C’mon, we’re putting you on a bus and getting you outta here!”

 
Comment by scdave
2007-10-10 08:34:42

90 degrees Monday afternoon, 49 degrees this morning ??

Ugh…….I’ll Pass….I am one of those p..see’s that ET talked about…

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 08:39:15

There’s a veritable s-load of water in the ocean clinging to California…

 
Comment by Magic Kat
2007-10-10 08:47:23

“move the people to the water…”

Excuse me, but there’s a huge body of water right next to the entire state of California called the Pacific Ocean. The technology exists to turn the salt into fresh water, but for reasons beyond me, it isn’t done. Something about control…

 
Comment by fran chise
2007-10-10 09:43:44

The restriction on water movement out of the Great Lakes is old news and the people in the Midwest, better not count on that saving them. It might just be cheaper for the Southwest to desalinate.

http://tinyurl.com/2×9q4o

 
Comment by wittbelle
2007-10-10 09:50:47

Desalination has a host of problems associated with it. 1)Requires a lot of power to run a desalination plant 2) The powering of a plant produces emissions harmful to the already delicate environment 3) The brine left behind cannot be put into the ocean without devistating consequences, so where to put the brine? 4)Water intake, unless done from a beach well also has devistating consequences to ocean life. We are basically screwed.

 
Comment by rj
2007-10-10 12:58:53

Late to the discussion, but I’d like to share my community’s water trouble.

Live in Rocky Mount, NC, about 70 miles east of Raleigh. A couple hours drive from the Atlantic Ocean. We’ve had maybe four days of rain this summer, one of which was this morning. The reservoir for the city is so low that grass has been growing on the parched ground and is almost dry. Our city has already been on Stage 1 water restrictions and is now going on Stage 2. The factory I work at is trying to figure out how to cut the plant’s water use by 10%, about 20000 gallons, so for starters they cut off all air conditioning throughout the plant (as a native Southerner that grew up next to a swamp, I can take humidity just fine so it doesn’t bug me, however, Yankees and people that live with AC don’t like it). We have some wells on the plant’s property but we’re previously discouraged from using them cause it would reduce the local groundwater table of all the houses around us that use wells. We don’t have any choice now. A lot of people’s private wells have gone dry and new holes for wells have had to be drilled. My city council signed an agreement with a nextdoor city for them to supply us water short-term. However, til January is a dry season for us so we don’t know what’s coming. We’re really hoping for a tropical storm of some kind.

In Raleigh, a city and area that has had massive population influx in the last couple decades, if things continue as they are, they’ll go dry in January it’s been stated.

 
Comment by hd74man
2007-10-10 18:11:33

RE: We’re really hoping for a tropical storm of some kind.

I think your area needs some more immigrants (snicker).

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 19:45:38

Campaign Speech in Los Angeles, on Sept 11, 1952

“It might not be too many years, for example, before you people of Los Angeles can get your drinking water from the sea. Already our scientists have made great progress in turning salt water into fresh.”

Adlai E. Stevenson, Jr.

Conscience means literally: with science

Who ratpured you away?

 
 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2007-10-10 05:48:54

Let’s say, for the sake of argument, that the banks and investment banks have written off all they need to on the instruments still on their books.

That doesn’t solve their problem.

The problem is, they have dumped most of those instruments on someone else’s books. And rather than marking to market, those someone elses will be experiencing a drip, drip, drip of losses on mortgage-backed bonds for years. Quarter after quarter.

Meanwhile, the banks and investment banks will have to convince those someone elses to invest in new non-Freddie and Fannie, non-conforming loans. Or else their FUTURE income goes away.

I’m told that thousands of people in NYC are sitting at their desks with nothing to do, in an industry that hires up rapidly, paying whatever it takes, and dumps people ruthlessly.

Comment by jag
2007-10-10 06:41:51

“I’m told that thousands of people in NYC are sitting at their desks with nothing to do”

This same thought occured to me the other day. When a financial crisis occurs all kinds of investment plans have to be put on hold until the situation is sufficiently clarified. Can a buyout, corporate bond or IPO now be financed…at ANY rate?
Decisions have to slow down to some extent and as they slow down doesn’t doubt grow as well?

I think the “market”, in instances like these, looks to some kind of extraneous “signal” to indicate some kind of “all clear” now exists. In this case, people believe the Fed’s cut was the all clear but I wonder. Are the investors who have to fund future financial propositions so easily convinced that a mere Fed action, relative to the size of the credit problems that exist today, is a sufficient “event”?

Perhaps it will be like 1998. But, as others have noted, that was a relatively small crisis. This one is not only bigger but, because of the rising RE issues around the world and the expansion of derivitive use (that no one seems to be able to get a handle on) shouldn’t the level of investor doubt be much, much higher?

 
Comment by fred hooper
2007-10-10 06:56:31

FOMC Minutes:

“Although financial markets were expected to stabilize over time, participants judged that credit markets were likely to restrain economic growth in the period ahead. Given existing commitments to customers and the increased resistance of investors to purchasing some securitized products, banks might need to take a large volume of assets onto their balance sheets over coming weeks, including leveraged loans, asset-backed commercial paper, and some types of mortgages. Banks’ concerns about the implications of rapid growth in their balance sheets for their capital ratios and for their liquidity, as well as the recent deterioration in various term funding markets, might well lead banks to tighten the availability of credit to households and firms.”

Pissed off commentary:
http://market-ticker.denninger.net/

“THE FED HAS BEEN COMPLICIT IN ABROGATION OF THE REGULATORY BANKING FRAMEWORK AND HAS KNOWINGLY LOOKED THE OTHER WAY WHILE BANKS CREATED SIVS AND CONDUITS FOR THE EXPLICIT PURPOSE OF EVADING REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS.

THIS HAS NOW BEEN ADMITTED TO IN THE ABOVE QUOTE OF THE FOMC MINUTES!

THIS S–T MUST STOP AS IT MAKES AN ABSOLUTE F—–G BALD ASS MOCKERY OF BANKING SYSTEM REGULATION!

THERE IS NO REGULATION WHATSOEVER WHEN IT COMES TO CONTROL OF THE MONEY/CREDIT SUPPLY NOR DO RESERVE REQUIREMENTS AND REGULATORY CAPITAL MEAN A THING ANY MORE!

ITS ALL BULLS–T AND THE ENTIRE BANKING SYSTEM IS LITERALLY HANGING BY A F——G THREAD!

WHEN ARE YOU PEOPLE GOING TO F——G WAKE UP AND START SCREAMING AT YOUR CONGRESSFOLK?

WILL IT BE BEFORE OR AFTER WE HAVE THOUSANDS OF BANK FAILURES AND THE FDIC GOES BANKRUPT, LEAVING YOUR SO-CALLED $100,000 BANK ACCOUNT “INSURANCE” WORTHLESS?

ARE YOU GOING TO GO GET YOUR MONEY OUT OF THE BANK TOMORROW? YOU BETTER BECAUSE YOU JUST READ THAT THE FED KNOWS THAT THE BANKS ARE GAMING THE SYSTEM AND HAS REFUSED TO STOP IT!”

Comment by krazy bill
2007-10-10 07:03:49

Please use your indoor voice.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Kime
2007-10-10 08:58:37

Fred,

I agree with this commentary, but nothing is ever done until disaster has struck, and the regulations are created or enforced after the damage is done.

Anyone who believes that FDIC will be able to insure their money in the crisis ahead needs to think again and check to see how their bank is rated by an independent company such as Weiss Ratings, which has a list of the most stable banks in the USA free on their web site but to look at the ratings for most banks it costs about $20. They have to charge because they get no money from the companies they rate, that is how they stay independent. You might want to change banks if you keep much money in the bank.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by auger-inn
2007-10-10 09:44:29

Perhaps there is something a bit more sinister being planned? Seems a bit odd that no one in a leadership position seems at all surprised or concerned about any of this.
Gee, the president of Mexico seems to know something!
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58052

 
Comment by spike66
2007-10-10 17:58:06

So, devalue the dollar to intro a new currency?? This is the Bush/Cheney/Paulson plan?? How is this not treason??
Destroy the borders, undermine the Constitution and destroy the currency?? i feel physically ill.
But hooray for Chavez, my new hero.

“(Larry)King, evidently startled by Fox’s revelation of the currency, asked pointedly, “It’s going to be like the euro dollar (sic), you mean?”
“Well, that would be long, long term,” Fox repeated.
Fox noted the FTAA plan had been thwarted by Hugo Chavez, the radical socialist president of Venezuela.
“Everything was running fluently until Hugo Chavez came,” Fox commented. “He decided to combat the idea and destroy the idea.”
Fox explained that he and Bush intended to proceed incrementally, establishing FTAA as an economic agreement first and waiting to create an amero-type currency later – a plan he also suggested was in place for NAFTA itself.
“I think the process to go, first step is trading agreement,” Fox said. “And then further on, a new vision, like we are trying to do with NAFTA.”

 
Comment by josemanolo7
2007-10-10 18:14:28

ugh. you’re assuming that our beloved president has even half the brain to understand what they agreed upon. not to mention that nothing he does is related to what he says.

 
 
Comment by Rob-In-Sunnyvale
2007-10-10 13:05:36

**WHEN ARE YOU PEOPLE GOING TO F——G WAKE UP AND START SCREAMING AT YOUR CONGRESSFOLK? WILL IT BE BEFORE OR AFTER WE HAVE THOUSANDS OF BANK FAILURES AND THE FDIC GOES BANKRUPT, LEAVING YOUR SO-CALLED $100,000 BANK ACCOUNT “INSURANCE” WORTHLESS.**

You forget about our national negative savings rate, so like only about 20 people in the whole country will be affected by the banks going under. Nobody else has any money. :) Remember what Spock said in ST-II, the debts of the many outweigh the savings of the few.

You also fail to see that this whole problem will magically resolve when Agent Smith assimilates Neo, thus resetting the matrix to its pre-anomoly state.

rob

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Van Gogh
2007-10-10 14:20:49

And that is exactly the (type of ) reason why i have been quietly adding to long term physical gold positions in my offshore account even though i don’t like the price of gold. If the implosion comes (and it should) at least i ought to have the physical gold and will accept the consequences of whatever price it trades at. I don’t think there has been any time in global history that the banking system has been so corrupt and mismanaged as today and that is all with full support by the PTB and the Central Banks. That too is why i am out of all the fiat paper stock market stuff. Everything seems to be just tied together with string and baling wire and i just don’t need to go near any of it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Deron
2007-10-10 07:24:34

I’ve been a bit of a bug for over a year on this issue. The financials account for a huge percentage of S&P earnings and the sector’s profits have been overstated by at least 100%. The banks have been setting aside too little for loan losses for several years. The reserves shrank (relative to lending, not in absolute dollars) significantly, while real risk was rising. The piggy bank raid rested - like almost everything else this cycle - on the assumption of a perpetual boom and permanently low losses.

When things started going back to normal instead - boom. Doubling and tripling of loss provisions. If they did that every quarter that might be enough - except that the pedulum is swinging and won’t stop at “normal” this time. Deep losses once they start to account honestly and for many quarters. That’s just for loss reserves. Once we dig into this mass of “Level 3″ assets, we’ll find most are of highly dubious value.

Half of the profits simply go away as the illusion is shattered. But those profits never really existed in the first place. Look at what that has done to the consensus earnings for the S&P - now negative. So earnings growth was largely illusory all along. With these hits, we can look forward to either rapid, enormous drops in reported profits or a long period where they fall continuously.

Comment by Civil
2007-10-10 08:07:10

A bank question. I ran across a reference yesterday about the repeal of Glass-Steagall in 1998. Did this have anything to do with the the growth in risky loans since then, as now all banks can do investment banking and still keep FDIC insured accounts?

Comment by Deron
2007-10-10 11:59:14

Glass-Steagall protected the commercial banking sector from risk by keeping them out of investment banking. It was part of the regulatory tradeoff of restrictions in return for guarantees of the deposit base. Since effective repeal of the act, we have had the worst of both worlds - taxpayers are still obligated but the restrictions have been loosened dramatically.

Banks either need to be regulated tightly to minimize risk to the taxpayer or allowed to operate in a true free market, with no guarantees. Either one can work as long as the risk and reward is balanced. As things stand, we have all the risk and they get all the rewards or heads they win, tails we lose.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Van Gogh
2007-10-10 14:27:19

Yep. And the FDIC is literally all hat, no cattle. They can’t back up deposits with promises and they don’t have much “equity” to support any meaningful bailouts. In essence, just another Ponzi Confidence Domino in the game.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by waaahoo
2007-10-10 04:36:32

Beachfront condos in my town that were listed in the mid 700’s are now listed in the mid 500’s and still sitting. These are not true condos but basically hotel room sized units so I can see them dropping to the mid 200’s eventually.

Comment by phillygal
2007-10-10 05:32:21

were you busy this past summer, work-wise?

Comment by waaahoo
2007-10-10 06:31:49

Very busy. I haven’t had much time to comment here. And I see 10 years worth of repair work with all the @#$%^ workmanhip on the houses built recently.

 
 
Comment by Devildog
2007-10-10 05:43:15

mid 200s? Think lower.

Comment by Neil
2007-10-10 05:59:03

I have to agree. You can’t really live in a condo-hotel except as a student. So the transaction prices must be down at student affordable with a down payment help from mommy and daddy.

Got popcorn?
Neil

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2007-10-10 06:41:07

Ah yes, the first generation to outfit ‘lil tiger and ‘lil princess with automobiles and dwellings - before they even put in a 40 hr. week. We’ve heard stories of this from across the country - let’s see what those “student investments” are really worth.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by are they crazy
2007-10-10 08:27:40

Neil: Those type units are also good for retirees. I wish there were more small units for them. As to college condos, in the boom it made sense. We sort of did it. Daughter accepted to private high school for arts - it was either make house payment or pay $15K for housing for her. We bought in 03 and sold when she graduated in 06. Just the luck of timing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Gwynster
2007-10-10 12:06:01

Crazy, you got very lucky. We call them Daddy houses here in Davis and folks who bought as long ago as 03 are having problems unloading them. I’m watching one that went REO this month and a handful more that will complete the cycle this winter to dumped on the MLS this spring.

Question: if these homes are secondary homes, do they become recourse loans in CA? I seem to remember they do. If are non-recourse loans but were specified at o/o in the loan documents, they go back to recourse - ouch.

 
 
 
Comment by waaahoo
2007-10-10 06:29:19

Yeah that’s just where I think conservative idiots will jump in.

 
 
 
Comment by Curt
2007-10-10 04:39:30

12 Step Program for Las Vegas???

Las Vegas home sellers need to come to grips with the seventh step in the grief recovery process, housing analyst Tim Sullivan said Tuesday.

“Acceptance,” the president of San Diego-based Sullivan Group said. “We’re going to see a 20 percent decline in prices. We’ve got to accept it and move on….

http://www.lvrj.com/business/10410897.html

Comment by Devildog
2007-10-10 05:46:33

“We’re going to see a 20 percent decline in prices. We’ve got to accept it and move on….”

Yeah, move on to 50% declines.

Comment by Jas Jain
2007-10-10 06:34:17


He forgot: “The rise in prices lead to rise in prices.” (During the bubble).

Similarly, fall in prices would lead to fall in prices. A 20% decline from here would lead to additional 10-15% of homes going into foreclosures, as “Walk Away!” becomes the only rational thing to do.

The best guess is prices at least going back to 2002 and most likely to 1996-98 levels.

Jas

 
Comment by ex-nnvmtgbrkr
2007-10-10 07:59:10

“Yeah, move on to 50% declines”

Amen brutha!

Comment by Pondering the Mess
2007-10-10 09:35:09

Once Vegas runs out of water, the value will basically go to zero… a point to consider…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Ernest
2007-10-10 09:48:32

LMAO!

 
 
Comment by Neil
2007-10-10 06:01:49

“We’re going to see a 20 percent decline in prices. We’ve got to accept it and move on….

Snicker. Ok, I understand buttering up the message so that it is acceptable. But Las Vegas will only see a 20 percent decline if they decide to take their medicine really fast. They won’t…

Las Vegas is far more overbuilt than that. Not to mention dealer tips are on the decline. Its one thing when dealers made $80-$90k per year. Las vegas housing prices must adapt to a wage drop. But hey, that isn’t something our government tracks. ;)

Got popcorn?
Neil

Comment by roguevalleygirl
2007-10-10 07:38:53

And I don’t think all those new hotel maids are going to be buying new homes this time around.

Comment by oxide
2007-10-10 09:24:32

Hotel maids! Here’s an excerpt from the PBS show “American Experience: Las Vegas:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/lasvegas/filmmore/pt.html
——-
Yvette Dixon, Maid, Bellagio: …here they got so many hotels coming up, stores open up everyday, so you can get a job real easy… I would come here and visit [my brother], and he said, you should come up here, it’s easy to get a house up here and stuff. When you apply for it, you can move into a brand new house. They build it the way you want, you know, the way you want them to, no money down. Not a penny. Now that was for me! I was ready for that. So it’s real nice, it’s a two bedroom, two bathroom, but right now I’m thinking about getting a bigger house because I have three granddaughters now, so we’re going to get a bigger place. … … This is indeed the best move I ever made. I wasn’t established in California. I went there in 1970. I never bought a house, I never owned anything, and when you get in your forties you have to own something, you know. So soon as I moved here, I got my jobs, got a new car, got a new truck, got a new house and I’ve only been here six years. I cleaned up!
——–

This was in aried in 2005. I’m sure Yvette is getting the “auger-inn special” right about now.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2007-10-10 17:28:37

for those of you who are relatively new to this blog, the “auger-inn special” is oxide’s euphemism for an “a$$ pounding”, a term first used by auger on this blog.

 
 
 
Comment by david cee
2007-10-10 07:55:10

The problem with median prices in Vegas, is that out of the 60 zip codes, only 4 are attracting significant sales. Mixing the sales and listings of 56 zip codes that are crashing with 4 zip codes that are holding their own, you get a distorted reading on price drop. It’s foolish to mix good houses located in good neighborhoods with crap houses out in the sticks, and come up with a 20% off or 50% decline.
The top 4 zip codes are located close to employment (the strip) have good schools, low crime, and strong neighborhood associations.

I track Vegas and have access to the Clasrk County MLS. The economists that get quoted missed the expansion and price run up in 2002 - 2005. They were wrong then, they are wrong now.
There is $30 billion dollars of hotel and casino construction going on the Strip, thru 2012. Construction workers are coming here from all over the US and getting high paying work. Employment is the key to how far down this bubble goes. To me, Vegas looks stronger that what these economist say.

Comment by lvrenter
2007-10-10 09:40:11

Las Vegas is a company town. All the expansion done in the last fifteen years has been a result of national and international economic prosperity - allowing people the luxury to travel and p*ss away their money at the craps table - take that away and you’ve got no support for the construction of new pleasure palaces and certainly no support for the million-dollar condo high rise market. Drive past the big condo projects at night, the ones that are “100% sold”, and all you see are dark windows. The 80-90k dealers and valet attendants are largely mythical as well. Vegas is a city built on dreams and illusions. I suspect those dreams will be shown to be not exactly as bright as originally envisioned quite soon. Just my humble opinion. I’m in the RE market but not the RE industry.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Chad
2007-10-10 13:21:19

I doubt that. I also think you are making too many assumptions. $30B in commercial construction over the next 5 years? Big deal! How does that compare to the last five years? What will that cover, 1 new casino and maybe 3 or 4 expansions to existing? Okay, let’s say that commercial construction was at zero, and now is ramping up (stop snickering, all of you). Do you not think that construction workers are jumping from residential (which dropped off a cliff) to commercial? Why would Vegas need a “new” influx of construction workers? And if there are all these new workers / jobs, why are there still 56 zip codes (your words) crashing?

“It’s foolish to mix good houses located in good neighborhoods with crap houses out in the sticks”

And you think that this methodology makes the data distorted? You’re an idiot. You use MORE information in statistical analyses to even out distortions (ouliers) and come up with more accurate means. You shouldn’t slice and dice the data to make your numbers look good or bad. What has been the price descline in the 56 crashing zips? What about the other 4? Off peak? YOY, MOM? Can’t say Vegas is doing fine by using only 6.6% of the area. Stop drinking koolaide.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by tj & the bear
2007-10-10 21:55:28

Vegas has already seen a 20% decline. They’d be lucky to stop after another 60%. Unfortunately, they won’t be lucky this time.

 
 
Comment by GH
2007-10-10 06:03:13

Prices up 100% ++ since 2003
Prices down 20%. And the mathematics behind this projection? Why 20% ? This is a 20-% drop from the current 10% drop? We are half way there?
Where do these economics morons get their numbers from?

 
 
Comment by Joe
2007-10-10 04:40:26

http://tinyurl.com/36ahm7

The product of Fed Policy: Mortgage Fraud occuring right next door to the Federal Gov’t. Now its ugly underside is being exposed!!

Comment by Joe
2007-10-10 05:48:29

FYI, these people the article features must be the greatest fools of all time. I cannot believe some of the things that came out of their mouths and quoted in the article. I have no sympathy. They actually were on the bring of being solvent and then their own greed and stupidity flushed it all down the toilet.

Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2007-10-10 07:41:09

WTF?

All they had wanted to do was fix the roof, replace the front door and some windows, and pay off bills.
The Pruntys purchased the three-bedroom house in February 1999 for $146,000.

I checked the mortgage records. If you ask me, they in effect pulled at least $180k out of the house! $180,000! I’ll explain why below.

Now are they gonna tell everyone they spent that on a door, a roof, and some windows? Oh, and “pay off bills”. I’d sure love to see what those bills are.

Actually, the whole scheme reeks of something fishy. The Prunty’s had bought it in 1999 for $140k. Then (says the article) they had financial problems, yet somehow they’ve managed to live there for 8 years. Not half bad.

Then they effectively sold it to a Daryl Johnson, and the $320k is what he bought the house for, according to various public records, borrowing $256k on one mortgage and $64k on another. Nice profit for them, or should have been, and to all appearances, THEY SOLD THE FRIKKIN’ HOUSE THEN! What were those boobs thinking? Where did the money go?

I know one thing: The WashPost reporter could have been a lot more clear in describing this story. Seems more like a deal where you sell your house to someone who pays you money to settle your debts, and then you rent it back from them — till they throw your ignorant self out to the curb.

Comment by Ernest
2007-10-10 10:04:07

“The WashPost reporter could have been a lot more clear in describing this story.”

Yes they could but then it wouldn’t have been a sob story.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2007-10-10 07:48:47

More on the topic (I hope my comments I just put in show up eventually). Here is the actual text from the document that George and Jacqueline signed. First paragraph:

“That for and in consideration of the sum of Three Hundred Twenty Thousand and 00/100 ($320,000), which includes the amount of any outstanding Mortgage of Deed of Trust, if any, the receipt whereof is acknowledged, the said Grantor does grant and covey to the said Daryl Johnson, Sole Owner, their assigns, the survivor of them and the survivor’s personal representatives and assigns in fee simple, all that lot and ground situate [sic] in Prince George’s County, Maryland and described as follows, that is to say:”

And then it describes their property! If that ain’t a sale, then I’m bozo the clown. What were they thinking? Duuuuuuh!

And farther down, they also signed the statement that they are exempt from withholding taxes on the sale of the property.

Comment by Joe
2007-10-10 09:54:17

Basically they got chumped and can’t admit to it.

The money store saw sucker written all overthem and probably laughed when they actually took their advice and skipped payments to go into default.

If all you did was go in for a refi then why did you walk out w/ a deed of sale to total stranger w/ a lease back? They exploited you because of some unwritten law/bond that people of the same color will only help and not screw each other over? We guess what, that’s not reality, thats a fantasy that they used to expoit you.

Whe you get a refi you should be walking out w/ a new mortgage note with all new terms w/ the deed still in your name!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by SawItComing
2007-10-10 08:47:23

“Now I want to go down to BET…….”

Don’t she know that BET be run by the Man?

Comment by not a gator
2007-10-10 09:51:02

The WOman, actually, but yeah. Totally.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2007-10-10 07:59:55

This is one of the DIRTY Secrets of Broadcasting, as long as the advertisers pay their bills on time, no one questions the content of the ads.

Just try and get a a local news reporter to investigate fraudulent or misleading ads on their tv station or newsoaoer..

Looking in their own backyard is forbidden…and you’ll probably get fired

=======================
Jacqueline Prunty, 51, said she heard about Metropolitan on nearly every radio station she listened to. The company advertised on gospel and R&B stations, promising to help homeowners like her with cash flow and credit problems. She was sold when she saw a spot on the Black Entertainment cable television station.

“Now I want to go down to BET and say, ‘Do you know what you’re putting out to our people?’ ” George Prunty said in a recent interview.

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 04:44:04

Canary in a coal mine, as practiced by the bird in question…

“Life for an actual canary in a coal mine could be described in three words - short but meaningful. Early coal mines did not feature ventilation systems, so miners would routinely bring a caged canary into new coal seams. Canaries are especially sensitive to methane and carbon monoxide, which made them ideal for detecting any dangerous gas build-ups. As long as the canary in a coal mine kept singing, the miners knew their air supply was safe. A dead canary in a coal mine signalled an immediate evacuation.”

http://www.wisegeek.com/what-does-it-mean-to-be-a-canary-in-a-coal-mine.htm

Coyotes in the cul de sac?

Animals are showing up in droves in subprimeburbia el lay, gotta get water, somehow?

Chihuahuas, ‘mmmm tasty

Holly Melcher of unincorporated West Whittier isn’t likely to forget the early morning hours of Sept. 14.

A coyote came into her backyard and attacked her dog.

She had taken her Chihuahuas, Doxxy and Precious, out into her yard when a coyote nudged the gate open and grabbed one dog by the neck.

“I stood up and said, `You drop my dog or I will eat you,”‘ she said. “`I will have you on my barbecue.’ The coyote dropped the dog.”

http://www.sgvtribune.com/ci_7114469?source=most_viewed

I delivered this very newspaper on my bicycle paper route, when I was 11-12 years old…

Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-10-10 04:58:12

poor thing.. that’s so sad.
It’s bad enough that man has invaded and taken over the coyote’s territory.. the least we might do is feed them a few of our useless, yapping ankle-biting canine vermin.

Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 05:06:00

“our useless, yapping ankle-biting canine vermin.”

Remind me again where chihuahuas come from.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 05:49:22

Typically, other Chihuahuas.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2007-10-10 05:06:06

I had a Great Horned Owl once try to take a 25 pound dog out of my yard. That was a sight to see.

Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-10-10 05:23:45

musta been a quite a sight to see.. especially from the dog’s point of view.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Devildog
2007-10-10 05:58:02

Yeah. I bet that dog was jettasoning ballast in all directions…

 
Comment by Neil
2007-10-10 06:04:13

Impressive. I’ve seen a barn owl take a rather fat bunny, but nothing as impressive as a 25 lb dog! That would be worth seeing.

Neil

 
Comment by auger-inn
2007-10-10 07:03:49

I lived in Alaska for a short time and remember reading a newspaper story about a older out of state couple that pulled over for gas in their camper trailer outside some small town in AK. While they were gassing up they let their little yapper dog get out and run around to stretch it’s legs. Sure enough, an eagle swooped down, snatched the pooch and flew off while the owners stood there dumbfounded.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2007-10-10 07:34:16

Even if the dog were in a coma, how would a 3 pound bird hope to loft a 25 pound lunch pail?

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-10-10 07:56:07

Great Horned Owls are often said to be the most dangerous owl, and it is reportedly the only bird of prey that has been known to kill a human being…

maybe he planned to tear it into tiny pieces first?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Horned_Owl

 
Comment by phillygal
2007-10-10 08:08:38

Seriously, Great Horned Owls like to show people who’s boss.

 
Comment by scdave
2007-10-10 08:50:15

Here in Santa Clara Valley in the western foothils we have a terrible Skunk problem…Why ?? Only natural preditor is the Horned Owl (Long Gone) and the red tail Hawk (Mostly just in the flat lands now)….

 
 
Comment by Premature Curmudgeon
2007-10-10 10:54:13

Similar situation for me, but it was a burrowing owl trying to take my 19 lb. dog. For photo of burrowing owl (man they are cranky):

http://www.flickr.com/photos/pattybruno/268964677/

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by spike66
2007-10-10 06:37:06

Since you’re in California, I suppose you plan to never be in an earthquake, or caught in a building collapse. Please be sure to let folks know that search and rescue dogs should never be used to help you.

Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-10-10 08:05:18

don’t get me wrong.. i have the greatest respect for dogs..

i have a suspicion that if dogs could talk, we’d realize they are much smarter than us, would then be considered a serious threat and hunted mercilessly to extinction.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Wickedheart
2007-10-10 08:26:28

Well, he was refering to chihuahuas. Just kiddin’ but seriously, I love dogs even chihuahuas but they are annoying and have itsy bitsy brains. Darn things tinkle and poo everywhere. I’ve never known one that wasn’t practically impossible to potty train. I had one visiting once, tinkeled all over my entire house.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2007-10-10 08:45:56

Get a pure breed that is highly trained and it beats haveing kids by a long shot,,,,,

 
Comment by Wickedheart
2007-10-10 10:04:47

“Get a pure breed that is highly trained and it beats haveing kids by a long shot,,,,,”

I’ll take my english coonhound pound puppy over that purebred chihuahua that piddled on every surface of my house and ME anyday.

 
Comment by spike66
2007-10-10 18:10:27

Sorry, I apologize for jumping on Joey…I get a little too defensive when I think folks are dissing dogs. In Manhattan, there are entirely too many mothers with these monster strollers who are happy to ram dogs who are walking along the sidewalk on a leash, minding their own business. Of course, I’d be happy to feed these mothers and their spawn to needy coyotes.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2007-10-10 06:11:07

FYI, coyotes are now pretty much everywhere in the U.S. Talk about an adaptable species.

Comment by Blano
2007-10-10 06:19:57

One was nabbed in downtown Detroit this summer. Probably for a parole violation.

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 06:20:29

Yes, that’s right, Bill. I recall a couple of years back my sis was living in one of those “carriage” houses on a large estate up in the Northeast, like 140 acres of land. They had coyotes on the property and the mother coyote had just given birth to pups and my sis was warned not to take walks in the woods for a few days. The owners of the property were concerned about liability issues and didn’t want to be sued by families living adjacent to the property, should young children be attacked, so they called in some wild animal control company to track down the animals.

 
Comment by manhattanite
2007-10-10 06:28:55

i believe there was even one found in manhattan (in central park) a few years ago. not kidding.

Comment by txchick57
2007-10-10 06:49:08

Hey, do you have a link to a blog or something with the full text of the 25 year old bimbo who posted on Craigslist looking for a rich banker and his response? The clips I saw were priceless!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2007-10-10 09:00:37

I will send it to you Chick…

 
Comment by Ren
2007-10-10 09:32:39

http://www.bangitout.com/articles/viewarticle.php?a=2003

For anyone else who is interested…

 
Comment by fran chise
2007-10-10 09:52:45

So, is she a bimbo or a coyote or both? Certainly predatory, but predators that are lost and can’t find game, starve….

 
Comment by auger-inn
2007-10-10 14:18:15

Man, that was a beaut!
“I know a woman in my yoga class who was married to an investment banker and lives in Tribeca, and she’s not as pretty as I am, nor is she a great genius. So what is she doing right? How do I get to her level?”
HINT: Learn the “pretzel” position and how to suck a golfball through a garden hose.

 
 
Comment by FED Up
2007-10-10 10:48:59

There was a coyote at a Quiznos in Chicago a few months ago.

http://tinyurl.com/2epxjo

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2007-10-10 07:40:39

This year I can hear up to a dozen of them singing to each other not too far away from my (rented) house. The landlord wants to put on a hunt. I don’t know what made them leave the area (Western NY) half a century ago, hear stories of only “coydogs” (sterile) being here at one time. Anyone know the history?

Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-10-10 10:31:11

I think my yard on Cape Cod was a coyote cut through. When the ambulances would go by, they’d feel compelled to answer. You’d be in the front yard thinking you were alone, the ambulance go by, siren blaring, and you’d realize there were probably 30-40 coyotes w/in a few hundred feet of us of the woods. Very eye opening! They did come into our yard regularly even in the middle of the day but did respect my chow. If he was out, you wouldn’t see them.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-10-10 08:49:22

adaptable… well, two years after the wolf was reintroduced to Yellowstone Park, the coyote population was cut in half… i guess it’s kinda hard to adapt to somethings.

 
Comment by Kathy
2007-10-10 14:34:02

I just saw one about 45 minutes ago on my way to pick up the kids from school. It was about 1/2 block from my house. By the way, this is in a near western suburb of Chicago in a neighborhood that has been developed since at least the 1940s.

Comment by Kathy
2007-10-10 14:35:04

By “one” I meant a coyote. Lots of foxes around here too.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2007-10-10 07:00:51

“I stood up and said, `You drop my dog or I will eat you,”‘ she said. “`I will have you on my barbecue.’ The coyote dropped the dog.”

When did wild animals learn english? Next time I’m in the woods and I see a bear I’m just going to stay calm and say “You stay away from me or I will have your hide on my family room wall.” That ought to do the trick.

Comment by phillygal
2007-10-10 07:52:48

If you articulate your warning in a stern tone of voice, the bear certainly will back off. But be polite. He’s Mister Bear to you…

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2007-10-10 08:02:57

When I first got here to Washington state I was out near Capitol Forest looking at unmapped wetlands when I encountered a great big pile of animal poop. Not steaming, quite, but very very fresh. With a bunch of fur in it, so not an herbivore. And a BIG heap. Bear? Supersized mutant wombat? Cougar? Paul Bunyan? I was fairly alarmed, so I started singing ‘Jingle Bells’–all I could think of–to let it know I was coming so I wouldn’t startle whatever it was and make it eat me. Then I thought, ‘No! Stop singing! That just lets it know right where the tasty girl snack is! And make it mad, since I sing so crappy!’ I stopped with the festive Christmas tunes and got busy making tracks for my car, fast enough that I was probably just a noisy pink blur to whatever it was. And look! Here I am now! Uneaten!

Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 08:35:57

I had a great encounter in the High Sierra in 2006…

3 Black Bear cubs, all about the size of a small microwave, crossed down over the trail, 20 feet ahead of me. I backed off another 15 feet and mom came down, she kinda smelled me for a few seconds and then got up on her hind legs (they have bad vision, wonderful sense of smell) and “shadow boxed” me for about 3 seconds and then was gone.

Grizzly Bears can be dangerous, Black Bears seldom are.

I’ve seen perhaps 600 or so.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 08:56:36

p.s.:

2 of the 3 cubs are dead by now, statistically

Mother Nature’s a tough taskmaster

 
 
Comment by speedingpullet
2007-10-10 09:05:29

Apparently, that’s one of the ‘right’ things to do in bear territory - I saw quite a few hikers with bells on thier backpacks when we were up in Yellowstone a few weeks back. Making a noise warns the bears you are around, and, strangely, in most cases they’re more afraid of you than you are of them.

Re: speaking in a stern voice to animals - try telling an annoying fly that if it doesn’t go away now, you will kill it.

Amazingly, in about 6 out of 10 cases, it will shoot off and never bother you again.
I have no idea why or how it works, but next time you get divebombed by an irritating little germ-incubator, try it out.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by auger-inn
2007-10-10 09:48:11

The bells are to let the grizzlys know it’s dinner time and the pepper spray is for seasoning. :)

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2007-10-10 09:55:03

Wow. You are a FlyWhisperer.

 
Comment by speedingpullet
2007-10-10 10:44:14

LOL!

Sadly, my Beastmaster skills do not stretch to higher life-forms, such as SUV drivers talking on their cell phones

…..hang on, did I say higher life-forms…

 
 
 
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2007-10-10 18:31:00

“I see a bear I’m just going to stay calm and say “You stay away from me or I will have your hide on my family room wall.” ”

Hey, we do NOT threaten bears on this site. Bears are a protected species here. Hated and hunted into extinction by the rest of the population, bears come here for rest, a safe harbor, and companionship. (Heck, I suspect eventually there will be some mini bears from encounters on this site. :D )

So all you Stephen Colbert wannabes and possibly RE trolls trying to extinct the bears in an underhanded fashion - back off! Bears rule! (And pigs get slaughtered.)

 
 
Comment by wittbelle
2007-10-10 10:50:54

Our neighborhood backs up to the final few miles of the Santa Ana River bed. Coyotes live in dens in the surrounding dirt and come out at dusk to feast on rabbits and kitty cats. Sometimes the neighborhood kids will chase them back into hiding. I hear their eery calls in the middle of the night and and occassionally I can hear the helpless yelping of their prey. My kitties stay inside the house.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 21:45:12

We have indoor kitties as well…

They look out the window in awe of nature passing by.

In the city, they’d do that peculiar “I see a bird noise”, but there’s too many birds, some big ones, red tailed hawks and turkey vultures et al, that have shut down their avian taunts.

A Beautiful red tailed hawk killed itself, running into our window… 2 weeks ago.

Sad to see it die in such a fashion, was akin to a P-51 running into the side of a mountain.

 
 
 
Comment by Michael Viking
2007-10-10 04:46:02

This link from December 2006 still entertains:
http://tinyurl.com/2skean
I’d love to contact those two smarmy dudes, show them this video, ridicule them, and then for good measure maybe punch them in the face for their lack of manners.

Comment by Drowning Pool
2007-10-10 05:18:44

Mike, my wife just said the same thing! Let’s do a prank phone call in the tradition of the “jerky boys”.

Comment by exeter
2007-10-10 05:45:05

Uncle Freddy!!! You killed Uncle Freddy! Oh my goodness!!!! lmao…

 
 
Comment by Little Al
2007-10-10 05:30:55

Hey, the guy might be a jerk but with hair like that who’s listening to the words. How many Joe6packs went to their hairdressers to have it done just like that. Peter Schiff didn’t have curls, a fro, highlights, nothing. Man, I think even his teeth are his own. Yuch!

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-10-10 06:00:34

Fox News Fabio is married to Brenda Buttner. That’s a gruesome thought. He and Barbara Corcoran are the resident real estate shills on that show. Mike Norman is a ball-washing dope. I think he must own a ton of Revlon stock because even guys in Chelsea don’t wear that much makeup.

Comment by Blano
2007-10-10 06:21:49

Forgive the unwashed heathen living in flyover country…who is Brenda Buttner??

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-10-10 06:27:02

She hosts Bulls & Bears on Fox News on Saturday mornings.

 
Comment by walt526
2007-10-10 06:38:51

That’s a woman??? You’ve got to be (bleep)ing me.

 
Comment by Blano
2007-10-10 06:41:03

Thank you!!

 
 
Comment by scdave
2007-10-10 09:07:04

NYboy;….And what ever happened to the “Long Haired” Remax cheerleader that appeared on the same show..??..He’s been gone for awhile…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2007-10-10 04:46:06

the bubble is dead; long live the bubble?

By Sacha Pfeiffer, Globe Staff | October 10, 2007

ARLINGTON - When Dave Stewart put his house up for sale this summer in the midst of a slumping real estate market, he held his breath and hoped for the best. Then the bidding began.

His modest two-bedroom home in Arlington Heights was listed on a Friday for $459,000. By Saturday it had had several private showings. The next day, after an open house, he received eight offers at or above asking price, so he asked the four highest bidders for their best offers. On Monday the house sold for $480,000, more than a 50 percent profit on what he had paid for it three years earlier

http://tinyurl.com/2567xd

Comment by Schnooks
2007-10-10 04:53:47

I’m in arl hts illinois…. ain’t happn here

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-10-10 05:11:40

Dateline 2007 ..
For many buyers and sellers, Arlington has that magic blend: proximity to Boston, respectable schools, desirable housing stock, prices notably lower than in surrounding communities, and city amenities in a town setting, such as a thriving restaurant scene.

Dateline 2009:
For most, the real reasons behind Arlington’s rapid decline into little more than a vast wasteland of abandoned, deteriorating homes is a true mystery to the remaining residents of what was once a thriving community…

Comment by downpuppy
2007-10-10 06:13:36

Arlington Hts is next to Lexington, where $1 million will get you a garage. It really is quite nice, with good access both to Boston & Rte 128. I’m surprised anything there is under a half million.

It’s also 5 miles from my house. Around 2009, we might be moving on up.

Comment by not a gator
2007-10-10 10:04:50

Why? No transit service.

All of the communities that passed on rail service in the 1970’s and 1980’s experienced a–how shall we call it?–secular drop in housing prices compared to those that had it.

Also–and this doesn’t matter as much since MCAS–Arlington schools don’t have the good reputation that Lexington and Newton have.

Btw, Arlington used to be a swankier suburb. So did many of the communities that gave up or refused rail service, believing at the time in some NIMBY logic that rail brought inner city crime. (Inner city dropouts can’t find 60 cents for bus fare, never mind $2.25! And the old M&B conductors were bruisers.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by downpuppy
2007-10-10 10:42:52

Mass Ave is a nightmare, but otherwise it’s not so bad. The bikeway (the old B & M rail line) goes straight to the Alewife T, or you can get commuter rail in Belmont. The west part of it runs by the Great Meadows ( a pretty swamp). Much livelier since they gave up being dry.

There was one winter I worked in Burlington & mostly drove through Arlington. Every morning, there was this angry, shabby, runner with a bent stride who would run right towards oncoming traffic on Route 3….

good times.

 
 
 
 
Comment by hd74man
2007-10-10 18:17:44

Beantown Globe hype for a solo city.

BFD…Nothin’ more than an attempt to sway the perception of the masses.

Millions go into their coffers from real estate advertising.

They gotta keep their Hindenburg inflated.

 
 
Comment by kahunabear
2007-10-10 05:11:40
Comment by Drowning Pool
2007-10-10 05:22:41

Kahuna, that one really got us going. What a riot! Great cartoon!

Comment by kahunabear
2007-10-10 05:45:49

I just changed it a little, may be funnier now.

 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-10-10 05:27:44

i like that one..

Comment by walt526
2007-10-10 05:31:40

I would have liked it even better if it had featured an alien anal probe.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-10-10 06:28:55

Saturday nights at your house must be really wild.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Captain Credit Crunch
2007-10-10 10:44:53

I anonymously copied the link into an email to customer service at Countrywide.

 
 
Comment by walt526
2007-10-10 05:29:29

So I got a Zip Realty email this morning that one of the houses that I’m tracking had a price change… of $1000.

Price Reduced: 08/07/07 — $394,900 to $384,900
Price Reduced: 08/28/07 — $384,900 to $379,900
Price Reduced: 09/18/07 — $379,900 to $374,900
Price Reduced: 10/09/07 — $374,900 to $373,900

The house has been on the market for 86 days. It sold for $455k on 06/07/05, looks vacant, and is listed as a Countrywide REO page. The “new” price reflects exactly $150/sqft.

$125/sqft would put it at $311,250, which would put it among the more competitively priced homes in the area. You would think that rather than nibble with $5k and $1k decreases while the market has slipped an additional ~10% since the home was first listed in July.

It’s really not rocket-science: to move inventory, lower the price in a meaningful way. A 5.3% decrease over 90 days while the market is collapsing isn’t going to get it sold, and a 0.02% decrease is just wasting everyone’s time.

At $249,000 ($100/sqft–45% off its 2005 selling price) I’d consider it.

Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 05:39:44

walt, is this in Naples, Fla?

Comment by walt526
2007-10-10 05:40:51

Might as well be. Elk Grove, CA

 
Comment by walt526
2007-10-10 06:40:01

Might as well be. Elk Grove, CA.

 
 
 
Comment by Lou Minatti
2007-10-10 05:31:40

My mom is planning to sell the house and buy a larger one. She’s 65 and just retired. She says she knows for a fact she can get $170k for the house. The house she wants (new mcmansion crap… for a retired couple) is $300k. I questioned the wisdom of taking on a new mortgage at her age, even putting down 50%. I told her why not sell the house now and rent for a while and see how things shake out if you don’t believe me?

I guess I was preachy and lecturing when we were all out eating dinner Saturday night, and I called her back the next day to apologize. Not for what I said, but how I said it.

It still hasn’t dawned on most people.

Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 05:44:46

“I guess I was preachy and lecturing when we were all out eating dinner Saturday night, and I called her back the next day to apologize. Not for what I said, but how I said it.”

Sigh. Lou, rarely will parents listen to their children, no matter what tone you take with them. OK, here’s how you save her from herself. You’ve got to work with her mindset. Tell her you think she can get a lot more than $170,000 for the house, that you’ve come to your senses and feel that in this “hot” market the house is worth more and she shouldn’t “give it away”. Get an inflated appraisal from a realtor. Have her list the house at that price. That’ll at least hold her for a while.

Comment by scdave
2007-10-10 09:11:32

rarely will parents listen to their children ??

What goes around comes around (:

 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-10-10 05:58:29

As long as money is unlikely to become an issue, i’d just go along with it. Lots of ideas come and go when one is “just retired”.

Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 06:12:13

“As long as money is unlikely to become an issue,”

Even when you are well off, money can be a big issue when you are retired. My mother’s conservative retirement account lost big as a result of Greedspin’s cratering interest rates. She sold the large family house in the NE, was briefly a “millionaire” until she paid cash and downsized to a co-op, got ill and needed full time in home care, Greedspin screwed over her and others like her and she ended up having just enough to see her through to the end. And she made all the “right” moves that we on the blog talk about, worked hard, saved, conservatively invested and didn’t get into areas she knew nothing about.

Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-10-10 06:21:36

then in your case i’d advise against going along with it.. but i feel like i’m repeating myself. Money is a reasonably foreseeable weak point or it isn’t.

However, imho, it’s best tread very lightly when it comes to getting involved in decision making, planning or deciding anything about mom’s life, present or future.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 06:43:20

“However, imho, it’s best tread very lightly when it comes to getting involved in decision making, planning or deciding anything about mom’s life, present or future.”

Having been through it twice now (both parents are gone) care of parents is a very thorny area. Because unfortunately children are often left with the consequences of their parents’ actions later in life. Try fifteen years of handling a father who is physically active, very strong, but has a mild to moderate case of dementia. It’s a real laugh a minute, especially when you get a call from the NYPD that your parent is wandering around in front of Lincoln Center, when you thought he was safe at home in Connecticut. If you could handle them like a parent handles a child, it would be much easier, but it doesn’t work that way and society and AARP frowns on it.

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-10-10 06:55:43

Thankfully, there are a few good books out there that cover this specific subject. I can’t remember the title of the one I read or i’d recommend it.
Sometimes roles do get reversed and children must take control.. no question about that.

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 07:10:59

it’s interesting that in many cases, children end up taking care of their parents for as long if not more than their parents took care of them, while also dealing with children of their own and jobs as well. I wish someone would write a book about how to make brains last as long as the bodies.

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2007-10-10 07:22:56

i bet some kids get to begin taking care of mom at maybe 12 or so.. routinely stop at the store and buy a can of chili on the way home from school, heat it up on the stove before trying to wake mom up to stuff some food down the crack-ho’s throat.

we gotta remember to count our blessings.. often.

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 07:38:02

“we gotta remember to count our blessings.. often.”

True, but that others are worse off shouldn’t prevent us from dealing with the matters at hand, or make us complacent or grateful, for that matter.

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 07:44:26

“buy a can of chili on the way home from school, heat it up on the stove before trying to wake mom up to stuff some food down the crack-ho’s throat.”

Sort of reminds me of the “eat your food, remember the children starving in Africa” riff, but I get your drift.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2007-10-10 08:34:42

‘…unfortunately children are often left with the consequences of their parents’ actions later in life.’

So true. And not always even later in life. I had to do a lot of the raising of my siblings. 7 of them.
It’s called ‘birth control’, and I think it’s quite a good thing, but Mormons think big families are gooooood. Yeah. Suuure they are. Problem is, what if it turns out you’re not up to the task of raising all your kids you produce? It’s not like you can put them back. Someone has to do the care.
I am grateful however, that the smell of diapers eventually wore off my hands only 5 years or so after I escaped.

 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2007-10-10 06:57:59

Oh Palm, do I ever hear ya. These low interest rates/inflation is robbing our parents. Meanwhile our gov’t policies are cheating the unborn. Great strategy for the future BB - I hope he winds up in a home - alone.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2007-10-10 05:50:40
Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-10-10 06:30:26

But I thought we were in the “quasi sweet spot”? D’ohhh!

Comment by watcher
2007-10-10 07:32:57

Bittersweet.

 
 
Comment by packman
2007-10-10 07:29:25

There’s been an odd phenomenon lately - gold prices have been following the dollar’s bouncing in exact lock-step lately, however stronger so on the dollar downside than upside. In other words each decrease in N of the dollar causes an increase of M in gold - however a subsequent increase of N in the dollar only decreases gold by M/2 or so. So now gold is back to it’s recent highs even though the dollar is still off a ways from it’s recent lows.

aladinsane must be smiling. (me too actually; and I’m sure a bunch of other HBBers)

Comment by Hoz
2007-10-10 08:00:35

It does not make me smile.

I am very happy that you and others have protected yourselves. I am upset that we as a nation are in this position.

The depreciating dollar is just another tax. Gold goes up $100 but when you sell you get to pay taxes. Whoopdeefriggindoo! There is no increase in value, so you were just robbed by the government.

Gold is worth owning, but not as an investment.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 08:07:45

It’s a most excellent parachute, and my grandfather made the mistake of staying too long and not getting out, when the getting out was good, in those dark days of the late 1930’s…

We’ve made other plans

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2007-10-10 08:41:22

Is that a first hand story of confiscation?

I’ve got a little parachute too, only enough to make a fresh start if it comes to that.

What “other plans” might one consider?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2007-10-10 05:53:19

I was just looking back at the printout of the “How Toxic is Your Mortgage” Business Week cover. It was over a year ago.

The cat was out of the bag in the MSM in the summer of 2006. Yet people could still have cut the price a little and found a greater fool to buy for less than the 3Q 2005 peak, but more than it was worth. Most held out, however.

Could be too late now, just about everywhere except Manhattan. The greater fools are still around, but they cannot be financed.

Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 05:58:29

“Could be too late now, just about everywhere except Manhattan.”

And in Google country.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 06:04:22

Another factor, to consider…

Procrastination happens, and there are legions of homeowners that bought their house way back when, and are only now realizing that they’d better get hopping, selling it. The paid off house owner obviously has the most room to negotiate, and will be most responsible for comps coming down, in price.

3 Sellers now:

Newly built homes in crappy areas, by homeowners-homebuilders

Homeowners in established areas that bought 2002-2006

Homeowners in established areas that have paid off (or somewhere close) homes

Comment by Briar
2007-10-10 07:06:06

don’t forget homeowners in established areas that were paid off but took out big HELOCs to buy RVs and Hummers and go to Tahiti three times a year.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 07:07:38

ouch! happens

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-10-10 06:08:31

Can’t wait to see how the recent earnings stumble and/or warnings over the last 12 hours from Chevron, Alcoa, International Paper, Valero, Costco, and Monsanto are spun today.

Comment by Graspier
2007-10-10 07:11:24

The same way it’s always spun, “It’s a great time to buy”.

The answer that any salesman will give, no matter in what line of work is always “it’s a great time to buy” since without sales they no longer have a job.

 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2007-10-10 06:13:36


From yesterday’s inquiry on Santa Clara County:

I collect data more than once a week and the inventory on mlslistings.com is not manipulated. I have heard that on Realtor.com they are in some areas, e.g., Simi Valley.

One of the best monthly data source for SCC is:

http://rereport.com/scc/main.html

The Sep month end inventory for SFH was 4,875 and 514 sales during the month. There were 1730 new listings during the month.

Jas

 
 
Comment by vozworth
2007-10-10 06:41:01

NEW YORK, Oct 10 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Reserve said on Wednesday it was undertaking an overnight repurchase agreement to add temporary reserves to the banking system.

Federal funds were trading steady at 4.875 percent in the market after the announcement, above the 4.75 percent target rate the Fed sets.
************************************************
Republican debate last night sure did sound a lot like we are in a recession….

Comment by vozworth
2007-10-10 11:14:36

SAO PAULO, Oct 10 (Reuters) - Brazil’s central bank said on Wednesday it would hold an auction to buy U.S. dollars on the spot market, intervening for the third straight day after a two-month hiatus from the foreign exchange market.

The bank called the auction as the Brazilian real (BRBY: Quote, Profile, Research), which has gained about 17 percent so far this year, traded at a seven-year high. Shortly after the announcement, the real was 0.17 percent weaker at 1.806 to the dollar.

On Monday, the bank bought dollars for the first time since Aug. 13. Prior to that, it had been purchasing greenbacks on a daily basis for months, helping to lift Brazil’s foreign reserves to an all-time high of $162.17 billion.

****************************************************
Get ‘em while they last.

 
 
Comment by txchick57
Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 07:01:25

Thanks, tx. At first, Mr. Investment Banker sounds like he’s got it all wrapped up. But the comeback from Ms. Goldigger is priceless. Nice judo, using the strength of the opponent against him. No wonder the winner is a rich widow.

Comment by txchick57
2007-10-10 07:11:24

His comment

By the way, you could always find a way to make your own money - and then we wouldn’t need to have this difficult conversation.

is the same thing I would say. Make your own money. It really can be done and is quite liberating.

Comment by are they crazy
2007-10-10 08:50:36

Hey Tx: People thought I was a loon, but I taught both my daughters that being financially independent was their #1 goal prior to forming any lasting relationships. That way, they could pick who they wanted and dump them if they weren’t acceptable. Also taught them you attract what you are, so if you want higher quality men, be a higher quality woman. It’s really ashame what women have done to the next generation of girls. The examples being set are an embarrassment - all looks and superficial consumerism. It’s like we’re back to the 50s when then only goal in life for women is find a rich husband.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Olympiagal
2007-10-10 09:59:53

Oh, yes! Like those utterly horrible ‘Bratz’ dolls. Sexualized little plastic girls who only like to shop?! I think they are terrifying. And that’s just one example of the freakish things put out there for girls to model themselves after.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-10-10 10:21:14

I refer to Bratz as Slutz.

 
Comment by Dr.Strangelove
2007-10-10 11:55:42

“I taught both my daughters that being financially independent was their #1 goal prior to forming any lasting relationships. That way, they could pick who they wanted and dump them if they weren’t acceptable.”

That’s why more and more working females are seeing the positives of “pre-nups.”

DOC

 
Comment by CA renter
2007-10-11 03:58:03

It’s also why so many couples are having “fertility problems.” :(

 
 
 
Comment by hd74man
2007-10-10 18:31:33

CL has scads of female beggars.

 
 
Comment by SDGreg
2007-10-10 08:58:37

That’s hysterical.

gold digger = depreciating asset

Comment by MMG
2007-10-10 12:52:53

very eloquently put. He described her as a piece of luggage :mrgreen:

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 06:54:46

Strip-Mall Vacancies Hit 7.4%
By Ryan Chittum
Word Count: 769 | Companies Featured in This Article: Lowe’s, Home Depot

U.S. strip-mall vacancies only inched up in the third quarter, but still hit a 5½-year high, spurring concerns about cutbacks in consumer spending. Rentals of retail space in weak housing markets are getting hit disproportionately hard, as consumers rein in their purchases.

The retail sector has been a pillar of the commercial real-estate industry — and the overall economy — for the last seven years, riding out economic downturns on steady consumer spending strengthened by soaring housing prices and easy credit. The end of the housing boom and the current credit crunch have analysts and investors watching for signs of …

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119197598965354165.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news

Comment by phillygal
2007-10-10 08:07:12

I saw a pretty startling development in a local strip mall - the Dollar Store went out of business!

but it was promptly replaced by a local pet shop (chain store).

My roommate works at QVC. She told me yesterday they were slow. That is really unusual.

Comment by Olympiagal
2007-10-10 08:26:49

A Dollar store went out of business?! NOOOOOOooooooOOOO!
The horror!

I love Dollar Stores. I mean that. Love them, with a religious fervor, sincere in every way. I went out to San Diego to visit my sister–quite a horrid place, I thought, awful air and way too many people–and went to a 99cent store visit there that was possibly one of the highlights of my year. Maybe of my life. And my life is pretty exciting.
Ahhh.
I have to go lie down now and calm myself.

Comment by yensoy
2007-10-10 14:52:37

I heard Chinese toothpaste doesn’t sell very well these days.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by LILLL
2007-10-10 08:37:25

My business has dropped off a cliff within the last month-I’ve seen it slow…but never like this! This is highly unusual. I’m seeing unusual tightness and pinching of pennies. Recession?

Comment by scdave
2007-10-10 09:41:36

What type of business and where are you ??

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2007-10-10 11:47:09


Lill,

I have already forecast that the US economy is in recession already. The economists take a year after the beginning of the recession to admit that in deed economy had entered recession. I also forecast that the US economy would be in depression during 2008-10.

The media is full of recession/depression deniers.

Jas

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Captain Credit Crunch
2007-10-10 10:56:59

The dollar store has expiration built into its being in an inflationary environment. Sooner or later they won’t find anything to sell for a dollar.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 07:08:56

Why does NASDAQ get plunge protection today while the DJIA is allowed to drop like a rock? UNFAIR!

http://www.marketwatch.com/tools/marketsummary/

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 07:11:24

Have these GFs already forgotten within 24 hours of the Fed meeting minutes release that more rate cuts are on the way? Common gang, buy the dips! Stock prices always go up, in the long run…

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 07:12:32

Meant to say “come on, gang,” but maybe “common gang” is more apropos.

 
 
Comment by watcher
2007-10-10 07:13:00

Because the Dow is above Bernanke put level of 13250.

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 07:16:06

I’m sure you realize it is at least 14K already…

Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 07:21:04

I won’t be happy until we see 14,000 in the rearview mirror.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 07:27:16

I guess you are expecting another speculative blowout to the upside soon? DJIA 39,000, here we come! Buy now or get priced out of the stock market forever!!

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 07:32:07

Actually, it looks as though the hard floor below the DJIA is currently pegged at 14,100 or so. Why don’t investers take a hint and run with the bulls? The stock market never goes down, by very much anyway.

Comment by Cooper
2007-10-10 08:07:16

Lurker here. What is going on with the stock market? Seems like it truly does only go up no matter the news or outlook. The int’l markets are going crazy. I just sold most of my positions in August, figuring that the run is over, and now it’s going gangbusters. Time to get back in, or is this truly the endgame?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Shake
2007-10-10 08:32:29

I’m skeptical of buying in at these levels….i did some selling last week in all my investments . Of course if there is another rate cut around the bend, it would appear the Fed is stimulating another stock market bubble so people will keep spending. Problem is most Americans don’t draw income from the stock market so consumer spending will still likely fall. The wealth effect has gone from tech stocks, to housing and now back to stocks.

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-10-10 09:03:26

The US stock markets are stagnant.

There is no volume

There is no upward momentum

The famous Dow is only 30 stocks

The US stock market is over 5000 stocks

Good markets do not trend on rumors or unreasonable future expectations

Many investors are waiting to sell for tax reasons - IMHO, a mistake - tax rates have never been this low

Most rumors require outside market activity to bail out the US (e.g. Berkshire Hathaway buying, China buying, OPEC buying etc.)

Many US companies indices are down for the year, (banks -14% , retail -8%, investment banks - 12%) This is American industry

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 10:45:44

DJIA coming in for a soft landing at 14K. Time to buy the dip.

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-10-10 14:39:47

“All you need is faith and trust
and just a little bit of pixie dust”
Peter Pan

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by luvin_grits
2007-10-10 07:11:02

Walking tour of the neighborhood in Kyle Tx. (Austin area) Street opened late 2004.
Foreclosure posted on next street up on Fri. First on our street yesterday. Of 32 homes on our street, the foreclosure and three ‘for sale’ signs. Several others for sale in the development and a few lease signs out, too. Checked some of the subdivision for MLS vs builder pricing, and most are within the builder range. Regional builder, low end prices, 0% down ( gotta qualify) still offered on their website.
Rumor is that a batch of approx 10 this past summer were sold to an investor. Haven’t been around to confirm. Still building though, with another dozen or so in process, a few with sold signs.

 
Comment by Homoaner
2007-10-10 07:16:04

Minnesota’s second-largest energy supplier says one out of three customers is behind on their energy bills this year. They’ve disconnected about 30,000 customers for nonpayment this past summer.

“Our contention is our delinquency issues are probably symptomatic of bigger issues, like the real estate housing market and the credit crunch,” he said. “If somebody’s focusing on paying their mortgage, they’re probably not paying our bill.”

http://www.startribune.com/535/story/1474714.html

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 07:17:20

Minutes Confirm Fed Flip-Flop
The Sept. 18 minutes show the FOMC’s about face regarding inflation, which is good for stocks and commodities, says Liz Rappaport.

http://www.thestreet.com/video/index.html?clipId=1373_10383593&channel=Market+Strategy&cm_ven=&cm_cat=FREE&cm_ite=NA#10383593

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 07:22:13

Why does the Fed think it is critical for lenders to make loans that enable households to purchase homes they cannot afford? This seemed to me like a bad idea before the 2007 subprime implosion and credit crunch, and seems like an even worse idea in the aftermath.

Fed’s Rosengren urges banks to enter subprime market
By Greg Robb
Last Update: 8:41 AM ET Oct 10, 2007

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Commercial and savings banks may find profitable opportunities to explore in the subprime mortgage market, said Eric Rosengren, the new president of the Boston Federal Reserve Bank. “The most critical issue is that financing that supports responsible subprime lending continue,” Rosengren said in a speech to the Chamber of Commerce in Portland, Maine.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/feds-rosengren-urges-banks-enter/story.aspx?guid=%7BDC0433FF%2D5CA9%2D4A63%2DBC78%2D85A9F9FE8CBB%7D

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 07:25:16

“responsible subprime lending continue”

I would like to see one shard of evidence that any meaningful level of ‘responsible subprime lending’ was occurring before the credit crunch struck a coup de grâce to the practice.

 
Comment by polly
2007-10-10 08:42:57

Prof,

I would think that responsible sub-prime lending would be lending at amounts that allowed people to buy (full PITI and some for upkeep) for less than they could rent. Then folks who destroyed their credit rating for identifiable reasons (medical bills, loss of job that has since been replaced with steady employment, irresponsible spending that resulted in a well-learned lesson, etc.), but want the responsibility of a house could get one.

Of course, lending those amounts won’t get anyone a house in this market, but that will change eventually.

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 09:23:01

Holding lenders to the prudent standard you suggest would guarantee a housing price crash in this market, though.

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-10-10 09:09:35

And, people still wonder why we are in this mess.

 
 
Comment by Shake
2007-10-10 07:50:09

http://www.reuters.com/articlePrint?articleId=USL0936312820071009

Americans charge it as Bank of Subprime closes: James Saft
Tue Oct 9, 2007 12:21pm EDT
By James Saft

LONDON (Reuters) - The automated teller for home loans is empty and Americans are relying increasingly on credit cards to pay their living costs, indicating tough hurdles ahead for U.S. consumer spending and markets.

 
Comment by auger-inn
2007-10-10 08:06:35

A couple of observations from the road. I’m currently in the North Conway/Jackson, NH area of the country, getting ready to hit the road west tomorrow. My wife and I had decided that we really like the area (still do) and if we could find a decent rental we would stay the winter here (great X-ctry and downhill areas). My daughter starts kindergarten next Sept so between now and then we need to get a place or decide to home school.
Anyway, we found a couple of places that we thought we’d look at and both were being handled by realtor/property management folks. The first was a house on the market in an established ( 8-10 yrs old), upscale neighborhood of about a dozen homes. It is listed for 595K and the one next door is under contract (don’t know sale price) but not yet closed. No others are for sale on MLS or have a FSBO sign. The rent was offered at $1,200 + utilities and the owner pays assoc. fees ($100/mo I think). It turns out the owner didn’t really want a “real” renter in there but someone to show the house while it remained up for sale. We declined that offer. I basically spent 5 days playing phone tag and chasing down the realtor in order to ascertain that “fine print” point.
Second house was a seasonal Ski-Chalet type that we were showed by a local realtor (all tits, no-brain type) that obviously has made it through life to date by looks and not ambition. She knew absolutely no details about either the house or the owners intentions with regard to utilities/furniture remaining in house/length of long term rental, etc. She is the main point of contact for real estate rentals at her office, believe that or not. We declined that one as well and remain on Plan A which is to spend the winter on a Florida Beach.
What is noteable about the conversations I’ve had with the realtors is that they all think this slowdown will pass by next year and are advising clients accordingly. From my unscientific and layman observations I would characterize the real estate business in the area as in a slowdown but not yet distressed. I’m hoping that changes by next summer.

Comment by palmetto
2007-10-10 08:12:12

“We declined that one as well and remain on Plan A which is to spend the winter on a Florida Beach.”

You could do worse. It’s a nice place to bide your time, anyway and if the augur-inns do arrive here, the IQ in the state will rise a few points.

Did you leave a little cable at Bretton Woods?

Comment by auger-inn
2007-10-10 09:51:02

Left him a little “floating currency” to ponder on his next visit!

 
 
Comment by exeter
2007-10-10 08:44:31

“What is noteable about the conversations I’ve had with the realtors is that they all think this slowdown will pass by next year and are advising clients accordingly.”

Then it appears to me that this bust part of the cycle is gonna be a long deep one.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-10-10 09:45:14

The Conway, NH/Kancamagus Hwy was my summer stomping ground in the 80s. Its so hard to fathom the $595k price. I went there for an anniversary celebration last year and didn’t think that that much had changed. If anything the crowds and traffic were smaller.

In the 90s when I lived in the Boston area, it became obvious a lot of Boston area retirees were taking their local equity and buying something big and beautiful in NH where they had probably spent all their weekends during their working years.

 
 
Comment by Shake
2007-10-10 08:59:24

clearly no one has learned that real estate down cycle are long and protracted. They usually last for a period of 5-9 years. Read Scott Burns latest article.

 
Comment by Magic Kat
2007-10-10 09:01:54

OT: saw the Cubbies final game in Chicago - scalpers were out in force selling bleacher seats for $300. In Phoenix, the winning Dbacks can’t Give tickets away for the championship series against the Rockies. Tomorrow’s game has something like 12,000 tickets left. My friend in Scottsdale (a RE Broker) asked me if I wanted her 4 tickets - she reported that her recent sale fell out of escrow and now she’s broke. 4 tixs at $85 = $340. Plus parking, $10 beers, $8 hot dogs, $4 ice cream sundaes at the ballpark, and soon it’s a $500 nite. You won’t find scalpers at Chase Field - unless they are selling the tickets for below face value. It’s the championship series! for god’s sakes. On the other hand, it seems sporting events are for the wealthy. I can remember paying $10 a ticket to see the Dodgers years ago. Sigh.

Comment by Shake
2007-10-10 09:06:47

I heard about this on the radio this morning. It looks like things are a lot worse out west than in Boston or Cleveland. A couple of years ago people would have been taking home equity withdrawal to go to playoff games in Arizona.
Tickets are expensive but they cannot be had in Boston or Cleveland.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-10-10 09:25:37

How many of those seats are corporate owned, though? Since I was a buyer in the area, I went to many a Sox game w/o shelling out a dime. Celtics too.

My roommate was a buyer in a completely different industry. Sometimes she played hostess w/the freebies.

Comment by Magic Kat
2007-10-10 10:30:26

I used to be a co-owner of a clothing distributor. We purchased blocks of Angel and Ducks tickets and gave them to buyers when they came to town. It wasn’t cheap.
Also, the 12,000 championship series tickets are for public sale through the Diamondback box office.
It seems to me that the whole Phoenix area is depressed due to that big joshua tree up its ass.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Hold out in LA
2007-10-10 16:44:34

In Los Angeles, The Staples Center is running a television ad campaign for premium seating.
They never had to that before. You can’t blame that on Kobe apathy alone.

 
 
Comment by Shake
2007-10-10 11:25:51

I’m sure many are corporate owned. But I think this illustrates the fact that some regions of the country arent as dependent on housing right now (say Boston or Silicon Valley) than others (like Phoenix or Miami). Crazy as it sounds, with lower rates ahead more folks that were house speculators now will have to go back to work and compete in the global economy. I’m guessing this won’t be a trivial task for many. I suspect many will end up playing the stock market again like in the late 90s.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Hoz
2007-10-10 09:08:53

Hope springs eternal for Cubs fans - if Chicago won once there would not be future demand

Arizona has won, something the Cubs cannot do

Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 09:23:50

I’ll trade you the Cubs for the Bills, straight up.

Comment by Hoz
2007-10-10 12:45:16

This is a lose/lose proposition.

A Yankees / Cowboy trade is more appealing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 16:09:44

I’ll throw in Buffalo…

 
Comment by Earl The Vagabond
2007-10-10 19:51:37

Aladin’s just mad at Buffalo ’cause our ghetto retreats only cost $50k instead of $300k like CA..

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-10 19:59:18

Saw a few $10k estates, when I was there…

 
Comment by Earl The Vagabond
2007-10-11 19:00:13

You’re a brave man.. Or well armed..

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2007-10-10 09:15:23

Bennett posts this chart again on Minyanville. If you all are short homebuilders (I’m long right now) keep a leash on it. Inverted h&s on it and huge short interest.

https://image.minyanville.com/assets/FCK_Aug2007/File/Links%20Charts%201/sg2007101042542.gif

Comment by MrBubble
2007-10-10 10:30:26

Thx Tx. But now I feel like the kid from a Christmas Story when he tips over the hubcap containing the lug nuts. “Fuuuuuuuudge…. Only I didn’t say ‘Fudge’.”

Les jeux sont fait. Or in the other words of Jean-Paul Sartre, “Auvoir, gophair.”

 
Comment by tuxedo_junction
2007-10-10 10:40:22

I closed my builder shorts when they hit my target of a 50% drop; I’m not greedy.

I’m now sitting on four bank shorts and recently shorted ICF because it’s weighted towards commercial and retail and I didn’t want to be concentrated in 3 or 4 individual REITs. Any thoughts on commercial and retail REITs?

Comment by txchick57
2007-10-10 12:37:38

Shorted those last summer when the Zell thing came out. Been trading in and out of them with a short bias, as always, lol.

If I could overcome this short bias, I’d be a lot wealthier!

 
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-10-10 09:24:05

Oct. 9 (Bloomberg) — Dubai will spend $11 billion on a waterway longer than the Panama Canal to encircle the downtown and expand waterfront property available for development.

Dubai is spending billions of dollars in oil and gas revenue on mega-projects such as the Burj Dubai, the world’s tallest building, and waterfront homes on palm-tree-shaped manmade islands. The Arabian Canal, which will reach a width of 150 meters, will involve digging one million cubic meters of earth every day over the three years it will take to complete.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601010&sid=a5n.JXDfQWoE&refer=news

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 09:55:54

“…Burj Dubai, the world’s tallest building,…”

World’s tallest building under construction in close proximity to the world’s greatest concentration of terrorists. Why does this seem a bit precarious to me?

Comment by Hoz
2007-10-10 13:25:30

From this wilderness, the greatest proximity of terrorists seems to be less than 1000 miles away.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-10-11 07:44:47

touche’

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wittbelle
2007-10-10 09:29:37

PPT ALERT!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 09:53:31

Credit card debt is ready to blow
Jay Hancock
October 10, 2007

After every financial crisis over the past 10 years, the Federal Reserve has cut interest rates and pumped money into the economy. Each rescue solved the problem - and created a new one.

The next bomb from this chain reaction of bailouts and blowups will be credit-card debt. Hardly anybody is talking about it yet, but banks and consumers are laying the ground for a wave of credit-card defaults, bankruptcies and asset write-offs for 2009 or so.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bal-bz.hancock10oct10001523,0,987590.column?coll=bal_business_util

Comment by Blue Skye
2007-10-10 15:03:58

Professor,

Doesn’t the new BK law put some teeth into CCD debt? I wonder if “judgements” will be the theme rather than bankruptcies?

 
Comment by AKron
2007-10-10 23:46:17

My favorite line in the article:

‘Increasing market share is often banker-ese for “making lots of loans that won’t get paid back.”

 
 
Comment by arroyogrande
2007-10-10 10:15:49

Highest average pay in Orange County, CA in 2005 was in Newport Beach (from OC Register):

http://tinyurl.com/2xlwjn

The average pay in Newport Beach in 2005 was $75,000. Yes, that is right, with all of those “rich” people living in “high average pay” Newport Beach, the average was only $75,000 a year. That may seem like a lot in many parts of the country, but that’s far from “rich” on the coasts. And at $75,000 a year, you should only be able to afford a $225,000 - $375,000 house (at 3x to 5x yearly income).

I call bullsh*t on all of the “rich people are now moving here” nonsense that ALL coastal communities seem to spout. Yes, these numbers are from 2 years ago, but I doubt that the average has gone up very much in those two years. Comments?

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 10:28:37

“The average pay in Newport Beach in 2005 was $75,000.”

Does that include real estate investment income?

 
Comment by tuxedo_junction
2007-10-10 10:42:10

People consider their HELOC borrowings income.

 
Comment by Drowning Pool
2007-10-10 19:16:02

“I call bullsh*t on all of the “rich people are now moving here” nonsense that ALL coastal communities seem to spout. Yes, these numbers are from 2 years ago, but I doubt that the average has gone up very much in those two years. Comments? ”

I lived in Huntington in 2003 and 2004. I was making less than $120K and I would not have dreamed of trying to live in Newport. The houses were all listed in the millions of dollars. I rented for $1,100 in an area where the houses were selling for $1-$1.5M.

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-10-10 10:22:05

Surprise! Surprise! NAR downgrades outlook again, Bloomberg:

New-home sales may decline 24 percent to a 10-year low of 804,000 and existing home sales will fall 11 percent, the National Association of Realtors said in a news release today. It was the 10th time this year the Chicago-based group lowered some part of its monthly housing and economic forecast.

“A cutback in housing construction is a positive sign for the market because it will help lower inventory and firm up home prices,” Lawrence Yun, an NAR economist, said in the report.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=avnlQrn9zu2w

Comment by Deron
2007-10-10 11:18:30

“It was the 10th time this year the Chicago-based group lowered some part of its monthly housing and economic forecast.”
————–

I especially liked this part. Other than going to twice monthly revisions, would it be possible for them to look any further behind the curve?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 11:37:36

I liked this part:

“A cutback in housing construction is a positive sign for the market…”

Comment by JRinUT
2007-10-10 13:04:45

LOL! Unless you make your living building homes or doing tradework related to building homes.

 
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-10-10 10:24:03

Oct. 10 (Bloomberg) — Goldman Sachs Group Inc., the world’s biggest securities firm, said its holdings backed by pools of bonds and loans dropped 53 percent in the third quarter, the second consecutive decline amid a global credit contraction.

The “fair value” of retained interests in collateralized debt obligations and loan obligations sank to $1.77 billion at the end of August from $3.79 billion three months earlier, the New York-based firm said in a regulatory filing. Investments in mortgage-backed securities fell 16 percent.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=av.P7JBOkjck

Comment by Blano
2007-10-10 12:29:42

Cut by more than half in 3 months……WOW!!!

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-10-10 12:33:45

“Goldman’s filing today doesn’t say whether its holdings shrank because the firm marked them down, or sold them, or both.”

Possibly sold some, but there was so little interest by buyers that to unload $2B in CDO debt would have been selling at 65% discount.

IMHO this is important because bank exposure was 500 to 700X greater than GS.

 
Comment by Shake
2007-10-10 17:59:10

Goldman can do no wrong w/ Paulson in the driver’s seat.

 
 
Comment by ridingthewave
2007-10-10 11:03:32

looks like senator mccain wants interest rates set to zero. whats this guy thinking?!?!

http://online.barrons.com/article/SB119196523530153865.html?mod=yahoobarrons&ru=yahoo

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 11:16:10

“Moreover, the Arizona senator went on to say, he wishes interest rates could be zero. He might ask how American retirees or Japanese savers feel about seeing their interest earnings shrivel to next to nothing.”

Interest rates were near zero in Japan for the past fifteen+ years. Meanwhile, their home prices went into a fifteen-year period of decline.

Comment by Blano
2007-10-10 12:28:11

He also wishes to be President, thank God that won’t ever happen either (I wish anyways).

 
 
Comment by vozworth
2007-10-10 11:17:28

I think hes’ gonna call Romney’s attorney, to see what Ron Paul has decided the Constitution says about Rate Setting by the FED.

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 11:36:23

I doubt the Constitution has much of anything to say about the Fed, as the former dates back to 1787 while the latter did not exist until 1913.

Comment by vozworth
2007-10-10 12:34:15

I am not sure I can understand your response, are you saying Mccain is not going to call Romney’s attorney? Or are you saying that Ron Paul would not take a call from Romney’s attorney’s?

You simply cant have it both ways.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by vozworth
2007-10-10 19:16:29

The confusion we live in these days is a deep one, traumatic in its intensity and violence. While chasing debt-soaked dollars down a filthy, rusty drainpipe, it’s hard to differentiate between friends and enemies. From gutter height, everyone looks like an enemy. And that’s exactly how it’s meant to be; welcome to the new class war pitching the dissolving middle class against itself in one long reality TV show. Rich versus poor is a fairy tale. Middle class versus itself is the reality. The confusion is real, and it’s intentional.

on minyanville……..sums me up, at the momment

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by New2OC
2007-10-10 11:51:26

Just visiting Gary Watts’ predictions at impactre.com. Looks like he has removed his detailed predictions for 2007, and only his 7% appreciation number remains.

Gone is his critique of the “headlines” predicting doom.

Gone is his predictions for 2007, including the end of the subprime issue, inventories of only 6-8 months in OC and a rise in house prices in Q4.

Guess he doesn’t want the accountability, but thank goodness for google cache!

 
Comment by ridingthewave
2007-10-10 12:00:32

this may have already been posted, but i would like to know what drugs Lawrence Yun is taking to make some of these predictions. lol

“The speculative excesses have been removed from the market and home sales are returning to fundamentally healthy levels, while prices remain near record highs, reflecting favorable mortgage rates and positive job gains,” Yun said.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071010/housing_forecast_realtors.html?.v=7

 
Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-10-10 12:15:48

S&P 500 Q3 earns likely to turn negative tomorrow - Thomson

By Nick Godt
Last Update: 2:29 PM ET Oct 10, 2007

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Third-quarter earnings of S&P 500 companies have “a good chance” of turning negative for the first time in five years on Thursday, after factoring in Wednesday’s profit-warnings from a slew of energy stocks, Thomson Financial said. “There’s a good chance that we’ll go negative tomorrow,” said John Butters, analyst at Thomson Financial. The third-quarter earnings growth rate is currently at 0.1%, and that’s without factoring in the profit warnings from Chevron (CVX) , Valero Energy
(VLO) and others, he said. However, Butters said that upwards revisions from other companies could keep the growth rate positive. Should year-on-year comparisons turned negative, it would be the first quarter of negative growth since the first quarter of 2002, Butters said

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 12:40:11

Are you suggesting the S&P 500 is about to start a massive blowout rally? Because generally speaking, the worse the news, the better the stock performance these days.

Comment by ridingthewave
2007-10-10 12:54:10

lol! you are correct about that!

 
Comment by P'cola Popper
2007-10-10 13:08:34

LOL. You sure have this game figured out Professor Bear.

It seems to me that the greater majority of market participants are like cult zombies after years and years of conditioning which are unable to hear the drip, drip, drip of the water leaking from the crack in the dam. Only the shock of the dam breaking upon them will snap them out of their trance. Unfortunately for most it will be too late.

I wonder how many times the above analogy has been posted at HBB? LOL!

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 13:21:01

One more time, just for old time’s sake:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Shake
2007-10-10 18:01:40

It doesn’t seem to matter what the numbers are or will be. The answer is: it doesn’t matter because the Fed will cut and save us all again. Its nice to know our economy is centrally controlled and nothing can go wrong :)

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 12:48:43

Reckless Rescues
October 8, 2007

Martin Hutchinson is the author of “Great Conservatives” (Academica Press, 2005) — details can be found on the Web site http://www.greatconservatives.com

Sheila Bair, chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation urged Thursday that mortgage servicers should force mortgage pools to reduce the long term interest rate at which subprime mortgages refix after the first few years, fixing the rate instead at the initial “teaser” rate. I trust no Bear’s Lair reader is remotely surprised at this development; it is typical of the soft-option-mania that has infested financial thought in the last decade. On the idea itself, to misquote Elizabeth Barrett Browning (who deserves to be misquoted) “How do I hate thee? Let me count the ways…”

Once upon a time, governments didn’t do rescues. The great Robert Banks Jenkinson, Lord Liverpool in a prime ministerial speech to the House of Lords during the 1825 speculative bubble, said: “I wish it however to be clearly understood, that those who now engage in Joint-Stock Companies, or other enterprises, enter on those speculations at their peril and risk. I think it my duty to declare, that I never will advise the introduction of any bill for their relief; on the contrary, if such a measure is proposed, I will oppose it, and I hope that Parliament will resist any measure of the kind.”

http://www.prudentbear.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4780&Itemid=53

 
Comment by Captain Credit Crunch
2007-10-10 13:54:43

Holy crap, someone(s) bought 6400 $10 Jan09 puts on CFC.

Comment by ahansen
2007-10-10 22:05:43

Hee hee hee.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 14:02:28

Paulson in drive to ease subprime ‘pain’
By Eoin Callan in Washington
Published: October 10 2007 20:47 | Last updated: October 10 2007 20:47

Home foreclosures in the wake of the subprime mortgage crisis will be “painful” for the US economy as well as for American families and neighbourhoods, Hank Paulson, Treasury secretary, said on Wednesday.

Mr Paulson announced a fresh drive to mitigate this damage by bringing together investors, bond issuers, mortgage service companies and consumer counselling agencies to “step up efforts to prevent foreclosure for as many families as possible”.

The industry groups are under pressure from the Treasury to respond more effectively to the rising rates of foreclosures following the collapse of the subprime market.

Record levels of defaults and foreclosures are expected to worsen as $350bn of adjustable-rate mortgages reset at higher rates in the next 18 months.

The Bush administration has also come under attack from Democrats in recent days for not better co-ordinating federal relief efforts, with House and Senate Democratic leaders calling for a mortgage “tsar” to be appointed.

The joint public-private steps announced yesterday follow a round of intensive meetings between Mr Paulson and company executives and stakeholders, but did not include any new money.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/99a87c80-775c-11dc-9de8-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 14:23:21

Congress Should Beware of Proposals to Bail Out Subprime Market, Taxpayer Group’s
Study Shows

Alexandria, VA · October 09, 2007 /PRNewswire/ — Congress is considering a number of measures to address home foreclosures, many of which are aimed at subprime mortgages. These loans are offered to lower income borrowers, particularly those whose credit history, income level, and net worth make them poor candidates for more traditional mortgages. Recently, Congressional leaders have even raised the possibility of appointing a mortgage “czar.” Bills are also under consideration to shift risk from subprime lenders to taxpayers, by allowing the Federal Housing Administration to insure riskier mortgages, and allowing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two government-sponsored enterprises, to buy riskier mortgages.

But a recent study by the National Taxpayers Union (NTU) warns that such actions could do more harm than good. “With news of subprime mortgage foreclosures, elected officials are crafting bailout plans that would put taxpayers on the hook,” said NTU Vice President for Communications Pete Sepp. “If ever there were a way to turn this problem into a full-blown crisis, overbearing government intervention would be the catalyst leading to catastrophe.”

http://www.prnewswire.com/mnr/ntu/29760/

Comment by ridingthewave
2007-10-10 14:48:29

this is what worries me the most about this housing mess. i wish they would just let the market purge out the players that gambled and lost. but i guess that is too much to ask for in an election year. heaven help us all.

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-10-10 14:34:59

That’s a lot of dough!

Oct. 10 (Bloomberg) — Morgan Stanley, the world’s second- biggest securities firm, said its quantitative strategy traders lost $390 million during a single day in August as their computer models failed to account for “widespread” investor selling.

Morgan Stanley said last month that the quantitative strategies group lost $480 million during the quarter after they were caught off-guard when other investors sold securities to reduce borrowings….

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=alkIFQWImqQg&refer=home

Comment by vozworth
2007-10-10 17:31:15

ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, Ill.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Municipal Insurance Company of America (the “Company”), an insurance company located in Arlington Heights, Illinois, announced that it received a Notice of Impairment from the Division of Insurance, Department of Financial and Professional Regulation of the State of Illinois, which notified the Company that the Company’s financial statement as of June 30, 2007 reflected surplus that was impaired in the amount of $4,136,125. The Notice of Impairment ordered that the Company shall correct such impairment within thirty (30) days from the date of such Notice by meeting the required minimum surplus of $1,500,000 as required by relevant Illinois law. The Notice further states that the Company shall be deemed insolvent in accordance with Illinois law if such impairment is not corrected within thirty (30) days
************************************************************
these investors are now impaired as well.

 
 
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2007-10-10 16:35:43

Speaking of Dough…provided by US Taxpayers…

The average cost of a “blackwater guard” in Iraq…$445,000 per year

“…The Pentagon has been reluctant to provide security for diplomats but another alternative might be joint State-Defense department patrols. Yet another would be hiring Blackwater and other private guards as temporary U.S. government employees”

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071010/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_iraq_blackwater

So what would be the G-rating of a US gov’t employee making $445,000 USD?

Got A-No-Bid-Contract?

Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2007-10-10 17:32:28

I’m sure the answer to my question must be in here somewhere?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Schedule

Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2007-10-10 17:36:31

“President George W. Bush proposed the eventual elimination of the GS to be replaced by a pay-for-performance concept throughout the Executive Branch of the government.”

So this begs the question: As of today, Oct 10th 2007…what should be the pay of: President Push & “Dicky Boy” Cheney?

 
 
Comment by spike66
2007-10-10 18:36:18

So blackwater guards are now in the top 5% of us taxpayers? per US Census data from 2005??
And, as overseas employees, they are exempt from taxes up to a certain level??
So, how do the grunts, whose families at home are subsisting on food stamps feel about that? How about the money not being spent at Walter Reed and other veterans hospitals??
So we have a huge military, largely underpaid, and a vastly overpaid, private, Imperial Guard. Gee, just what the Founding Fathers dreamed of when they wrote the Constitution.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 20:34:22

So far as I am aware, contract killers have always been paid well.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 20:36:08

A bailout showdown is brewing. Stay the course, conservative Republicans!

White House threatens to veto housing bill
Tue Oct 9, 2007 7:05pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration on Tuesday threatened to veto Democratic-written legislation designed to provide affordable housing for low-income families, saying it opposed the way a newly-created trust fund would be financed.

While the administration said it supports helping the poor gain housing, it “strongly opposes the establishment of an Affordable Housing Trust Fund financed by diverting Federal Housing Administration (FHA) receipts and housing-related Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) revenues.”

http://www.reuters.com/article/gc03/idUSWAT00824920071009

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-10-10 20:41:04

This idea that you can solve the affordable housing problem by giving people money to purchase homes they cannot afford should be buried along side the housing bubble itself.

Pelosi: House Passes National Affordable Housing Trust Fund Act
WASHINGTON, Oct. 10 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued the following statement today after the House approved H.R. 2895, National Affordable Housing Trust Fund Act of 2007, by a vote of 264 to 148. The bill, which provides the largest expansion in federal housing programs in decades, will initially allocate between $800 million and $1 billion annually directly to states and local communities, without increasing government spending or the federal deficit (S-U-R-R-R-R-E!!!):

“The National Affordable Housing Trust Fund will help end the
affordable housing crisis in America by producing or preserving 1.5 million
units of low- and very low-income housing over the next 10 years. The bill will assist cities and states address the most urgent affordable housing
needs in their communities while keeping our promise of fiscal responsibility to taxpayers with no new deficit spending.

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/10-10-2007/0004679775&EDATE=

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post