December 11, 2007

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For December 11, 2007

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

275 Comments »

Comment by M.B.A.
2007-12-11 04:13:37

someone in yesterday’s thread wants to throw ALL the people in jail - no room and I don’t want to pay. so once again - permanently tattoo LIAR or THIEF on their foreheads…

Comment by txchick57
2007-12-11 04:24:09

Yesterday was pretty interesting here. I learned how to grow my own weed and saw the dumbest people in America. Can we top that today?

Comment by nhz
2007-12-11 04:48:52

I missed that, but I’m starting to think that all Dutch homes have the option of a private weed plantation priced in already (yeilding about 50-75K yearly they say). The most horrible POS still sells for around 200K euro here, that’s 7x gross median income. If I read about homes in the US selling at auction for below $ 50K I’m stunned; you can’t even buy a small garage for that amount of money over here (well, maybe just if you search in some remote corner of the country).

Comment by azrenter
2007-12-11 05:47:10

i just had a small garage built by a contractor in my back yard. 12×24 single car. $5,000 cash is king.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Schnooks
2007-12-11 06:16:32

Too bad you didn’t have a Chicago pile of snow on your garage roof that caved in and the ins co gave you a brand new one for free.

 
 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2007-12-11 07:21:07

Well, the USA has more remote corners ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by fred hooper
2007-12-11 09:02:51

What happened to the Comments in the OC Register article? Do they hide them after a day? There wasn’t one sympathetic comment in 3 pages last night.

 
 
Comment by newbie
2007-12-11 04:24:37

or worse, print REALTOR on forehead (with trademark symbol)

Comment by hd74man
2007-12-11 08:45:20

RE: print REALTOR on forehead

These REALTWHORE sales chucks are starving to death.

Today’s local rag had a Letter to the Editor from a Realtor with 30 years experience who had been thru numerous “downturns”, and used Donald Trump (I guess he’s currently buying?) as a means to shame people for listening to the doom and gloomer’s and not taking advantage of the former’s current insight into the market conditions.

Interestingly, the letter writer conveniently chose to ignore
the Donald’s foray into bankruptcy during the last bust.

These buy now sales shills are truely demented.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2007-12-11 05:38:32

Can someone point me to yesterday’s fireworks? I may need some laughs today.

Comment by txchick57
2007-12-11 05:45:00

California thread.

Comment by exeter
2007-12-11 05:56:43

I demand jail time for the hucksters who perpetuated this mess. JAIL.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by phillygal
2007-12-11 08:43:11

Just finished reading that thread - from looking at the 60something grannybabe in the pic, guessing some of the 600k HELOC went to spa treatments and having “work” done.

 
 
Comment by tcm_guy
2007-12-11 06:52:49

Worth reading, Oxide. Hard to fathom. People who bought in 2005 in Housing Bubble Central in FL and surrounded in every direction and every city/town with tens of thousands of for sale/lease signs in every direction believe they have equity in their POSs.

People like that should only be flipping bugers at fast food or working as greeters at WallyWorlds. They should not be employed in any positions that require any thinking.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by exeter
2007-12-11 07:47:19

“People like that should only be flipping bugers at fast food or working as greeters at WallyWorlds. They should not be employed in any positions that require any thinking.”

Aren’t they already?

 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-12-11 08:12:57

Please drive up and pay at the 1st window.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Blano
2007-12-11 06:49:48

Dang you people are up early.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-12-11 04:57:40

“Loan applications have been so slow lately, says Lou Barnes, a mortgage banker in Boulder, Colo., that it feels like “our client base today is limited to people who don’t read the newspaper or watch television.” ‘

As I would’ve imagined.

Comment by Earl 288
2007-12-11 05:05:08

Why would anyone want to read a newspaper?

Comment by Jay_Huhman
2007-12-11 07:29:20

You take the ‘L’ to work.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Mikey(2)
2007-12-11 08:05:59

It’s hard to spill coffee on it, and even if you do, you can either rip out the wet part or trash the whole thing and go get a new one for less than a buck.

There’s an old audio recording by Mel Brooks that praises the attributes of Saran Wrap; sort of the same deal with newspapers.

How sad that such a simple pleasure as reading a newspaper has become a subject of mockery. Must everything that we do be converted to software?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2007-12-11 10:17:40

I dig getting my hands dirty reading the fishwraps…

You can’t really get a feel for what they are all about, reading them on-line.

Their prejudices and biases are laid bare in print version…

 
Comment by vozworth
2007-12-11 20:43:59

obviusly all the americans on this blog are not flying planes. or passenging.

 
 
Comment by phillygal
2007-12-11 08:44:44

coupons!

also, local weekend edition has schedule of fun things to do

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by LongIslandLost
2007-12-11 05:01:18

Great news. Mortgage rates are still pretty reasonable (below 8%). And, if a mortgage money is difficult to obtain, then the bids on houses will be lower.

Now, if we could just eliminate mortgages completely I would be ecstatic.

Comment by exeter
2007-12-11 05:23:47

“Now, if we could just eliminate mortgages completely I would be ecstatic.”

Eliminate all cheap credit? We might get back to basics in that case. Almost shangri-la by comparision.

 
Comment by Kime
2007-12-11 07:47:55

“Now, if we could just eliminate mortgages completely I would be ecstatic.”

But then, where would we get our money supply?

Comment by exeter
2007-12-11 07:50:05

“But then, where would we get our money supply?”

We get it from that thing that has become elusive to our leaders and followers alike……. WORK.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 11:08:21

What is 6 percent of a $500,000 loan to buy a California starter home?

Let’s see what grade school arithmetic says:

0.06 X $500,000 = $30,000 = 1/2 the median San Diego hh income.

It’s a PITI that there are additional costs of buying a home at the moment (including negative equity gains when knives are falling…).

Comment by vozworth
2007-12-11 20:45:24

service workers do not need afforadble housing, they need assignments.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by arlingtonva
2007-12-11 05:34:21

“With standards tightening, some borrowers who might previously have looked for a subprime mortgage or 100% financing are turning to loans guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration, which for a fee insures mortgages as much as $362,790. Peter Lansing, a mortgage banker in Denver, says that FHA loans accounted for more than half of his business last month, compared with less than 10% a year ago.”

Secretary Paulson to future taxpayers of America: Your welcome

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 07:24:05

Seems like the pain might actually accrue to last year’s prudent borrowers, who will soon learn that prices fall when lenders tighten underwriting standards, or to would-be borrowers, who may find it is much harder to get a loan now than it might have been a couple of years ago (although some will be spared the temptation to catch falling knives).

 
 
Comment by wmbz
 
Comment by bizarroworld
2007-12-11 04:53:25

Housing Market to Stay Ugly in 2008
Motly Fool
http://tinyurl.com/2uyzpy

Yet, realtor BS has put another customer in fantasy land:

“Our realtors think 2008 is going to be much better than 2007. If people are less scared to make a commitment then the market will start taking off again,” Stice said. “Until then, it’s not a bad place to hang out.”

Yun and crowd are in the heads of many with their optimistic real estate forecasts.

Comment by palmetto
2007-12-11 05:26:24

I couldn’t believe that NAR report. “The market is close to stabilizing”. WTF? I don’t even know what to say. I’m surprised someone doesn’t fire Yun’s arse.

Comment by exeter
2007-12-11 05:38:07

If one didn’t really know what kind of CrimeSyndicate NAR actually is, you’d think you’re going out of your mind when Lereah and Yun flap their jaws.

Comment by palmetto
2007-12-11 06:20:10

The thing is, exeter, I think that Liareah actually believed what he was saying. I don’t think that Yun believes what he says for a minute, but says it anyway, for a joke or out of contempt or whatever.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2007-12-11 07:22:56

Show Me His Condos!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 11:05:05

Yun does not seem as bright as his predecessor. His questionable statements are far less convincing, IMO…

 
Comment by sf jack
2007-12-11 11:38:30

They had different jobs - it’s difficult to compare them that way.

Lereah got out just in time. He still had millions who listened and didn’t know any better, for his job was to keep the bubble going or at least pretend it wasn’t recognizable.

Larry, on the other hand, is dealing with an ongoing disaster and trying to “dress up” what should be nearly obvious to everyone. It’s a tougher job.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 13:38:45

“It’s a tougher job.”

Good observation. I was explaining something very similar to my wife last night regarding AG’s versus BB’s jobs…

 
Comment by Anonymous Coward
2007-12-11 17:14:39

Poor Ben. Talk about being handed Mission Impossible. You know he’s not lovin’ Greenspan right about now.

 
 
 
Comment by bulwark
2007-12-11 08:14:57

Or sue NAR into oblivion. They don’t deserve to exist given how many FBs they’ve lured into this mess.

 
 
 
Comment by bizarroworld
2007-12-11 04:58:48

Edmonton housing starts fall dramatically — down 42.1%
http://tinyurl.com/2uknld

“Despite earlier concerns about the potential impact of the financial market storm on Canadian housing demand, home building remains a pillar of strength in the Canadian economy,” said BMO Capital Markets economist Robert Hogue. “With strong job creation and favourable interest rates still providing support, residential construction is carrying good momentum into 2008.”

Sounds like Canada’s version of Yun.

Comment by Van Gogh
2007-12-11 07:24:33

Now that is a real accident waiting to happen. Same applies all across Canada. All of the Prairie Provinces always have been “Next Year Country” and the blowoff in real estate over the past several years will devastate tens of thousands of people and in fact may very well have a serious effect on the Canadian Banking System and in fact could compromise it.
The commercial and recreational real estate markets and outright land speculation have been as bad or worse than the residential markets and there has been a true mass of carpetbaggers and flakes out pumping turn of the century type style (as in 1900) real estate syndications like you couldn’t even dream of.
TPTB have sat by and watched all this unfold with no attempt to protect the lambs and in fact i think they have been part of the “rah rah” crowd.
When the real shearing starts it will be an incredible sight to behold and probably no one will be held accountable for all the crap that has gone on.
In my wildest dreams (nightmares?) i could never ever think that things could unfold the way they have .

Comment by txchick57
2007-12-11 08:13:30

The Maritimes aren’t too shabby either.

 
Comment by manhattanite
2007-12-11 10:42:25

just curious — are canadian mcmansions any with any higher insulation standards than american mcshacks???

Comment by manhattanite
2007-12-11 10:48:29

‘built’

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-12-11 05:09:56

http://money.cnn.com/2007/12/11/news/economy/cnn_mortgage_poll/index.htm?cnn=yes

Americans split on mortgage bail-out. I was surprised by these numbers as I had read citizens were overwhelmingly against it.

Comment by combotechie
2007-12-11 05:21:09

Grain of salt time: Survey designers can get any result they require just by the proper framing of the questions.

Comment by cynicalgirl
2007-12-11 05:23:13

I was thinking the same thing. I also believe that FB’s should get “special treatment”, just not at the expense of the taxpayer. The question isn’t clear as to what it entails.

 
Comment by palmetto
2007-12-11 05:42:51

” Survey designers can get any result they require just by the proper framing of the questions.”

Yep. They use these focus groups, or as I like to call them, f**k-us groups. I’ve read about two focus groups that a couple of lobbying groups conducted, one was to sell the idea of bombing Iran, the other was to sell Americans on the idea of amnesty for illegals. The anecdotal reports were shocking, in how the questions were manipulated to elicit certain responses. I don’t know about any other HBBers, but I’m pissed and I’m tired of all the propaganda, in just about everything. Popular psychology bites the big one, but like a cancer, it has infiltrated education, business, media etc. It’s not about helping anyone, it’s about twisting and Pravda-izing everything.

Comment by Mikey(2)
2007-12-11 08:47:56

“F**k-us Groups,” LOL, I like that.

I don’t mind the propoganda as much as I mind the fact that people are actually swayed by it. If people weren’t affected by it, it would go away.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by patient renter
2007-12-11 11:55:38

Antiwar published an article by Dr. Paul today, about the buildup to war with Iran. I hope it doesn’t wind up as accurate a predictor of future events as Dr. Paul’s warning on Iraq was in 2002.

http://www.antiwar.com/paul/?articleid=12033

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by exeter
2007-12-11 05:27:16

hmmm… how divisive. Makes you wonder how all the public sentiment related to everything including govt. policy can be divide evenly and called a majority with such razor thin margins.

 
Comment by ronin
2007-12-11 05:43:29

I believe everything cnn tells me.

Comment by exeter
2007-12-11 05:46:37

In the case of Fixed News, I’m not surprised.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-12-11 06:31:24

LOL I know what you mean Ronin. As I posted it I knew I’d be reading these comments.

It’s just that these numbers were drastically different and not just slightly skewed that got my attention. And wouldn’t you expect CNN to be spinnining against the Republican plan instead of more in favor? Perhaps its the Lou Dobbs fans that skewed these numbers.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-12-11 06:44:44

LOL Ronin, my thoughts too. I knew I’d get these responses when I posted but wouldn’t you expect CNN to spin it that the administration’s plan is not supported? Maybe its the Lou Dobbs contingent that skewed the vote.

Comment by FB_wants_a_do_over
2007-12-11 08:10:15

The survey tells another story. The 51% will hear that the government is helping and believe it to be true. The 46% will read into the details and realize the plan is not going to help many people + be happy knowing this. In the end everyone is happy when they interpret the information to suit thier needs. Truely a short term political masterpiece in my mind.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by patient renter
2007-12-11 12:11:30

Poll numbers about this and all political issues always manage to reflect the extent to which the news station or parent company is incentivized by corporate sponsorship groups (financial, military industrial) to present certain poll numbers.

For example: There is a direct correlation between which Presidential candidates that get the most face time, and which Presidential candidate support policies that will most benefit the companies tied to the news corporation or its parent (ex. financial, military).

 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2007-12-11 05:45:16

I did my own poll Carrie Ann and I found that 91% of all Americans are complete morons 87% of the time. Don’t worry. The Europeans and Asians didn’t fare much better in my polling.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-12-11 06:33:08

“I did my own poll Carrie Ann and I found that 91% of all Americans are complete morons 87% of the time. ”

Best comment yet, NYC boy! I gotta tear myself away from the blog to home school. This one will keep me giggling all day.

 
Comment by caveat_emptor
2007-12-11 07:33:30

86.3% of all statistics are just made up.

Comment by Hold out in LA
2007-12-11 11:40:54

60% of the time it works 90% of the time.

I LOVE lamp!!!!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by hd74man
2007-12-11 08:49:38

RE: Americans split on mortgage bail-out.

Why wouldn’t it be splt?

Half the people in this country derive some form of government check provided by the sweat and toil of the other half.

WTF do the parasites care, if they’ve got no money in the game.

Comment by HBBLurker
2007-12-11 10:02:15

Exactly, I will say that a full 50 percent of the poeple in this country are parasites, and basicly boarderline retarted…Hence the success of reality tv…

Comment by not a gator
2007-12-11 11:04:02

Whoa, if you read Adam Smith, the existence of “the idle” is a primary signal to a nation’s wealth…

Btw, are non-working wives (or husbands) and minors parasites? How about decrepit old people?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by BJ
2007-12-11 10:32:46

The comments I read on the CNN Money site were nearly all negative! Perhaps CNN has the telephone numbers of a “few hundred ” Real Estate Agents that they conviently included in the survey. Don’t ever underestimate the shady tactics of the MSM

 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2007-12-11 05:21:09

I couldn’t find the link but this morning on CNN they did a story on the increase in student loan defaults.

Comment by txchick57
2007-12-11 05:31:55

Student loans are nondischargeable in bankruptcy 99 percent of the time. I wonder if someone will try to change that in the interest of political pandering.

Comment by not a gator
2007-12-11 11:09:08

Yeah, but you can default if you go to a judge (and pay the proper bribe?).

Rep. Stephen Lynch (South Boston) did it. There was a wealthy Asian-American woman who did the same thing, but she got busted because as it turned out she had a job offer from Brigham & Women’s Hospital in hand while she was pleading poverty to the judge. But for whatever reason Lynch not only got away scott-free, but was elected to high office!

The clincher–the opposition was considered even more corrupt! It was a gerrymandered district which included Needham (how is that even continguous???) and this sorry-ass Needham pol had set up her brother in housing built for the disabled and got her girlfriend a cushy 6-figure job…

When she lost, like so many failures with no integrity, she became director of HRC. (That shill from the RIAA succeeded her–basically the David Liareah of mp3’s.)

Guess what HRC–I didn’t remember you in my will. Must be an oversight.

 
 
Comment by Graspeer
2007-12-11 06:42:04

Not surprising, college education costs are rising much higher then inflation while wages are stagnant or dropping, mostly because of globalization. So it becomes harder and harder to find a job that will allow you to pay off the higher and higher cost of education.

Comment by housegeek
2007-12-11 06:54:57

Studen loans are an incredible untold story of debt - the laws changed back in the late 90s to allow banks to charge usurious fees to student loan debtors, and to put them on the hook the rest of their lives ( -i.e. -no bankruptcy discharge of this debt).

we are truly creating a generation of serfs.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-12-11 08:15:22

Let’s go serf’n now

Everybodys learnin’ how

Come on a serfari with me…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Carlsbad Renter
2007-12-11 10:13:25

Anybody that goes out and gets loaded down with student loans is a complete idiot and I don’t feel sorry for them. I joined the Army for four years with the college fund (at the time it was $25k and now it is significantly better). Left the Army and lived with my family while I went to a junior college for three years (I know, I know, but I was out of school for four years and I ended up with three associates - engineering, physics, and math). After JC, I went to the state university to get my electrical engineering degree on full academic scholarship. In the end, no student debt and now I have my masters.

I have met a number of people who went to school and obtained engineering degrees with no student loans. You don’t have to go to a private or expensive university to get a good education. Five years out of school, no one will really give a crap where you graduated from if you are smart. Therefore, no sympathy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Not your typical FB
2007-12-11 11:48:22

Well I don’t know what you consider “loaded up” but I went to state universities for my BA all the while working part-time and getting no help from my parents, and I accrued 15k in student loan debt. When I realized my liberal arts degree was worth squat since I changed my mind about wanting to an English teacher (decided I couldn’t stand most kids), I had to apply for several deferments during which time interest still accrued. My interest rates were 8% when I consolidated my loans and you can’t refinance for a lower rate after that. Got behind with a few payments, and here I am 8 years later and still owing 14k. The law can be changed to give people a break. Many graduates find that life after college is still about living paycheck to paycheck if you can even find a decent job. At least, we should be able to refinance and get the 2-3% interest today’s students get when taking out loans.

 
Comment by Anonymous Coward
2007-12-11 17:30:38

People shouldn’t have to sign away the rest of their lives to get an education. That’s indentured servitude. It’s admirable that you chose military service as a path to getting an education, but that’s also servitude. Again, it’s admirable that you did it, but people shouldn’t have to in order to get the basic level of education necessary to get a decent-paying job these days. Does anyone else think the timing of Harvard’s big tuition discount program was mighty fortuitous? Among other things, they will not count home equity in the family contribution formula. They probably know parent’s could no longer tap it if they wanted to. College tuition went up for the same reason housing prices went up: easy credit was available to finance the cost. The difference is that college-bound high school graduates (and not all should be college-bound) who didn’t want to seriously interrupt their career path couldn’t exactly “rent” an education. Debt bubbles suck. Being a debtor sucks, and our national spending is making lifelong debtors of people who aren’t even born yet. This has got to stop.

Sorry. It’s been a really shitty day.

 
 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2007-12-11 10:49:25

And that was the point all along.

Corporate Feudalism.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by not a gator
2007-12-11 11:11:42

It really goes back earlier than that, with the Stafford loan program itself. Suddenly, colleges decided that they had “urgent needs” to carpet the administration hallways, buy $1000 chairs for the trustees, “outsource” services, rip up plants and replace them every 6 mo.s, and kill a forest of trees every year to send mailings to prospective applicants.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by are they crazy
2007-12-11 08:56:26

Tell me about it. I have a college kid and luckily $30K of her $40K is scholarship. Assorted family all pony up the rest because the goal is to get her through without loans. She has a small on campus job for spending $ and works summers. There’s no way for her to work while in the program she’s in.

Comment by ronin
2007-12-11 10:35:03

My opinion is that the college tuition bubble is just another- and heretofore unreported- aspect of the credit bubble. I’ve suggested weekend topics to explore, but of course this would be off-topic.

Just as the credit bubble allowed housing to soar, so has it allowed tuitions to soar.

If credit had not been readily available, people would have balked at the incredible rate of tuition increase. Now they bite it because everyone is doing it.

It really doesn’t pay to go into debt to any extent for undergrad. Professional school, where there is the possibility of incremental payoff… maybe.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2007-12-11 11:14:22

Well, from reading Millionaire Next Door, unless your child has a good chance of rising to the top of their field (which is very competitive) probably not …

especially not doctors, they’re broke

I know some really smart people who went into medical research instead. Got their way paid by all of their schools and will probably stay in academia. Aside from the super-competitiveness, they should probably do okay because nobody expects lab rats to drive Mercedes.

 
Comment by REhobbyist
2007-12-11 15:26:45

Gator: If doctors are broke, it’s only because they spend too much. They are the highest paid of all. Your Mercedes comment implies that you agree with me. Maybe doctors would get more respect if they weren’t so shallow and materialistic.

 
Comment by westwood
2007-12-11 17:00:08

Post-docs in the biological sciences take home salaries in the mid 30s (higher at NIH). This is after an undergraduate degree and 5-7 years of grad school. They work evenings, weekends, and holidays with no overtime. Still sound like a good deal?

 
 
 
 
Comment by cny
2007-12-11 06:48:46

carrie ann. are you the one from the nice lake town in madison county?

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2007-12-11 05:29:47

I am also surprised at the stock market. But someone here posted about the market doing a drawn out head fake so as to drain the last drop from unsophisticated individual investors.

Comment by Craven Moorehead
2007-12-11 05:38:53

Monster 250 point rate-cut rally day!!

Comment by watcher
2007-12-11 05:45:26

Gold down, dollar up. Gotta love the pre-cut manipulation.

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 07:25:46

Maybe a surprise 1/4 point “insurance” tightening is on the way, to stem rising inflationary pressures? (Rex Nutting suggested yesterday that the alternative is 4 percent inflation on the way.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by combotechie
2007-12-11 06:37:03

I suspect this drawn out head fake will last until after the first of the year when the fresh money from IRAs and elsewhere come flooding in.

 
 
Comment by watcher
2007-12-11 05:37:46

a $34 billion cash fund closes:

Investors running for the exits have caused the closure of one of the largest U.S. short-term funds catering to institutional clients.

Columbia Management is shutting its Columbia Strategic Cash Portfolio, it told clients late last week, after facing major withdrawal requests from large investors. The fund, which held $34 billion at the end of November, has been split in two. Of the total, $21 billion has been put into accounts for the large investors who are seeking to cash out. An additional $12 billion remains in the fund, which will be wound down.

the money quote: “Only some investors will be able to get their cash out. Several of the fund’s biggest investors are being redeemed “in kind” — that is, they have been given their share of the underlying securities, rather than a cash payment.”

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119730710066819543.html

 
Comment by watcher
2007-12-11 05:43:29

chinese inflation at 11 year high:

Dec. 11 (Bloomberg) — China’s inflation accelerated at the quickest pace in 11 years and the trade surplus swelled, adding pressure on the central bank to raise interest rates and let the currency appreciate faster to cool the economy.

Consumer prices rose 6.9 percent in November from a year earlier after climbing 6.5 percent in October, the statistics bureau said today. That was more than the 6.5 percent median estimate of 21 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News.

Surging food and fuel costs and a record $238 billion surplus in the first 11 months have prompted the government to name inflation and overheating as the biggest threats to growth.

http://tinyurl.com/273hhv

Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 08:35:31

In Shift, China Greets U.S. Empty-Handed
“…The United States is attacking China every day about this and that. How is it possible that China would still want to buy?” said Mei Xinyu, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, which is affiliated with the Commerce Ministry.

The lukewarm reception the U.S. delegation is receiving this time around illustrates how much things have changed since Paulson and his Chinese counterpart, Vice Premier Wu Yi, launched the talks to great fanfare a year ago.

Since then the two countries have been engaged in a global public relations war over food and product safety. The United States has accused China of exporting poisonous pet food, lead-laced toys and exploding tires. China has responded by publicizing what it says are U.S. exports of tainted meat and nuts and, most recently, potato chips with a banned additive that had to be “destroyed.” …
http://tinyurl.com/yus3ql
Washington Post

 
 
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2007-12-11 05:45:53

Hey, are any Philly-area HBBers interested in a holiday/New Year’s get-together? We can’t let the New Yawkers have all the fun ;)

I also frequent the Lehigh Valley (you might have guessed) and Wilmington, Del. areas, in case anyone would like to meet up in those locales.

E-mail me at “ricercare2001 at yahoo dot com” if you’re interested.

Regards,
LehighValleyGuy

Comment by tcm_guy
2007-12-11 07:18:20

Don’t forget the requisite HBB sign on the table!

Comment by hd74man
2007-12-11 08:52:22

RE: Don’t forget the requisite HBB sign on the table!

If you put up a sign you’d better hire a security guard.

Might be some starving, drunk, deranged realtwhore lurking about.

 
 
Comment by phillygal
2007-12-11 08:50:39

Yes LVGuy, I can’t think of a better way to spend New Year’s than with HBBers. I don’t know if you’ve ever been to the Mummer’s parade, but the real fun is later down on 2 street.

It’s funny that you mention Wilmington DE. I just booked a work dinner at Sullivan’s steakhouse.

 
 
Comment by txchick57
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2007-12-11 07:27:12

That was pretty funny.

 
 
Comment by SDGreg
2007-12-11 05:58:12

“Since peaking in September 2005, the size-adjusted median price is down 15.8 percent for single-family homes and 18.3 percent for condos.”

http://tinyurl.com/36muja

Price declines in San Diego have accelerated since mid Summer after drifting downward since mid 2005.

 
Comment by txchick57
2007-12-11 06:09:11

But . .. but . . . but . . . there’s no bubble in Dallas! Isn’t it on the list of “safe” real estate markets for next year?

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/121107dnbusdfwresales.17ade72.html

 
Comment by bizarroworld
2007-12-11 06:13:25

H&R Block 2Q Loss Soars on Mortgage Meltdown; Final Results Delayed Until Friday
http://tinyurl.com/2kppar

Of that loss, $366.2 million, or $1.13 per share, came from discontinued operations, including much of its Option One Mortgage Corp., which has suffered as an increase in borrower defaults and a drying up of credit markets caused dozens of lenders to disappear.

Disappear? Houdini would be proud.

 
Comment by Fred Fry
2007-12-11 06:13:41

I wonder how many ‘homeowners’ think that the rate freeze will extend their interest-only period?

Mortgage ‘Rate-Freeze’ Does Not Delay Loan Resets

Oh, according to the guidelines, there is no need to sign an agreement in order to get the rate freeze, the servicer can freeze your rate if he thinks you qualify. However, since you did not sign, your rate can still go down, if it would have under the original mortgage, because you did not agree to your interest rate being frozen.

 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2007-12-11 06:15:09

Quote of the year:

“‘I don’t know why people aren’t buying. Interest is good. There’s plenty to choose from out there,’ Cotten muses. ‘It’s a buyer’s market. They should be buying.’”

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 07:27:31

What don’t Realtors get about the pain of catching a falling knife?

Comment by atlanta_renter
2007-12-11 11:33:24

It doesn’t pay for them to believe in a falling knife so it doesn’t exist.

 
 
 
Comment by A.B. Dada
2007-12-11 06:17:02

Hey, Ben. Any chance you’d be willing to look into an email subscription option for blog comment followup? I run Wordpress 2.0 as well, and there’s a nice plugin (free, and very easy to install) that lets you check a box upon writing a comment that will send you a follow up email if people reply.

I find that on my higher traffic blogs, the email actually decreases load on the server since people don’t have to repeatedly refresh the blog to see if anyone replied.

I’d be willing to pitch in a donation towards that being implemented.

 
Comment by charliebrown
2007-12-11 06:19:57

HELPING SUBPRIME?

Fannie Mae, the giant government-sponsored mortgage investor, last week raised costs for many borrowers by quietly adding a 0.25% up-front charge on all new mortgages that it buys or guarantees. On a $400,000 mortgage, that would mean an extra $1,000 in fees, almost certain to be passed on to the consumer. Freddie Mac, the other big government-sponsored mortgage investor, is expected to impose a similar fee soon, according to a person familiar with the situation.

Loan applications have been so slow lately, says Lou Barnes, a mortgage banker in Boulder, Colo., that it feels like “our client base today is limited to people who don’t read the newspaper or watch television.”

The fee is the latest in a series of moves by Fannie and Freddie that raise the cost of credit for some borrowers. Late last month, they imposed surcharges that affect mortgage borrowers who have credit scores below 680, on a standard scale of 300 to 850, and who are borrowing more than 70% of a property’s value. For example, someone with a credit score of 650 would pay a surcharge of 1.25% of the loan amount for a mortgage to be sold to Fannie. On a $300,000 loan, that would mean extra fees of $3,750. The fee could be paid in cash or in the form of a higher interest rate than would normally apply.

Comment by Graspeer
2007-12-11 06:50:11

Just one example of how the costs of bad lending practices of banks, bad borrowing practices of borrowers and bad investment practices of investors will be passed onto everyone.

Comment by Asparagus
2007-12-11 07:39:03

I’m really hoping that the free market works here.

There are a lot of lenders who need cash. Fees like this may start popping up. I really hope we have some entrepreneurs out there who will start new lending firms. These firms will have a clean slate and not be forced to tack on fees in order to cover their a$$es for all the greed from 2003-2006.

Hopefully the invisible hand will hit these guys one way or the other.

 
 
Comment by Tom
2007-12-11 07:50:34

I think they should raise fees. Run it like a business. Fannie and Freddie are losing Billions. If they don’t make money, guess who ends up bailing them out???

You got it, you, the taxpayer.

Comment by slorenter
2007-12-11 08:32:25

Yeah to about 15% so this housing downterm will only last 5 years instead of 20.

 
 
 
Comment by kahunabear
2007-12-11 06:23:02

Fed on Target
http://www.stockmania.com/index.php?showimage=110

Who knows how these guys come up with this stuff? I certainly don’t think it is as scientific as they would have us believe.

Comment by aladinsane
2007-12-11 07:25:52

Will (Arnold Ziffel) be able to “score”, using the bullseye eCONomy method?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 07:32:14

So that is what is meant by “inflation targeting.” Thanks for explaining it.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 13:02:58

Looks like the Fed missed your target, kahunabear.

 
 
Comment by kckid
2007-12-11 06:24:09

We just had an ice storm in the Midwest. The roads are wet but drivable. I noticed that along with the schools most of the government offices are closed. Why is it the private sector manages to stay open during winter storms but government seems to be quick to take the day off?

Comment by Graspeer
2007-12-11 06:53:24

Government gets your tax money whether they show up for work or not, private business has to at least show up for work to get paid.

 
Comment by Asparagus
2007-12-11 07:51:47

Did interest rates get frozen?

I think there’s a gov’t policy, if it’s so cold that interest rates freeze, close for the day.

 
Comment by WT Economist
2007-12-11 07:59:57

(Why is it the private sector manages to stay open during winter storms but government seems to be quick to take the day off?)

In NYC it is the opposite, but then NYC is better run than most local governments. How to get to where we are? Be run so incompetently that you go broke, then have all your local governments overseen by a control board for more than 30 years.

Be advised, however, that your taxes will still be high, because of Medicaid, local governments elsewhere in your state draining you, and past debts and pensions.

 
Comment by weinerdog43
2007-12-11 08:15:53

Uh, no. The only schools closed around here are private schools. The public schools are all open. Nice try though.

Comment by SawItComing
2007-12-11 10:04:33

I call B.S. on this. You went and checked the private schools? IF they are in fact closed, it’s probably because they are so far ahead of the government schools that a few days wont matter.

Comment by not a gator
2007-12-11 11:23:32

You never listen to school closing announcements on the radio, do you?

I agree, privates were always more eager to close.

Also, you’re wrong about time–in snowy areas, snow days are built into the school schedule. Only a repeat of ‘78 would induce a serious schedule problem.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by homoaner
2007-12-11 12:16:36

“Why is it the private sector manages to stay open during winter storms but government seems to be quick to take the day off?”

It’s the exact opposite here in Minnesota. The state and university almost never close, even when private businesses shut down or close early due to bad weather or events. The U has shut down only one day in the past twenty years. My siblings working in the private sector have racked up a lot more snow days than that.

 
 
Comment by txchick57
2007-12-11 06:25:38

Club Fed:

http://www.minyanville.com/articles/C-MBI-UBS-wm/index/a/15165

and my $$$ is safely on it’s way from Wamu to Goldchain Silverknife as Jas likes to call it.

Comment by watcher
2007-12-11 06:34:17

Gambino Sachs?

 
Comment by matt
2007-12-11 08:42:21

I don’t know why the focus on the discount rate. The fed has to put a gun to the head of the bankers to get them to use the discount window. The banks would rather cough up 11% to foreign loan sharks rather than go to the fed.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2007-12-11 10:24:29

Bankers waiting for costs to go down lower at the Fed discount window ,while they keep rates lower on long term CD rates .

 
Comment by tuxedo_junction
2007-12-11 10:37:04

Preferred stock counts as capital so the bank pays “real” money (10%+ dividend) for an accounting entry that keeps its capital ratio above the regulatory minimum.

Nonsense like this took place throughout the S&L debacle and probably took place in Japan too.

 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2007-12-11 06:38:46

H&R Block 2Q Loss Soars on Mortgage Meltdown; Final Results Delayed Until Friday

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) — H&R Block Inc., the nation’s largest tax preparer, said in a preliminary earnings report Tuesday that it expected a huge second-quarter loss as it continued to wrestle with its disintegrating mortgage arm.

In a securities filing, the company said it was submitting its quarterly report late, citing a decision earlier this fall to change accounting firms. The company was scheduled to file late Monday.

But it said it expected a net loss of $502.3 million, or $1.55 per share, for the quarter ending Oct. 31, compared with a loss of $156.5 million, or 49 cents per share, during the same period a year ago.

 
Comment by dennisd
2007-12-11 06:42:49

Pensacola News Journal , Pensacola, FL
“Subprime-related securities probe sought”

http://tinyurl.com/2bkoxk

Comment by Paul in Jax
2007-12-11 06:57:36

Coleman Stipanovich, the hack in charge of loading the fund up with bad investments, has an interesting background. Lots of hits from a google search. Check this out from 2002:

http://www.sptimes.com/2002/04/10/Business/Pension_board_weighs_.shtml

Nepotism in Florida politics seems to be causing a lot of problems. Must note, though, that Stipanovich was certainly not overpaid: $182,000/year when he was forced out last week. Wonder what kind of perks and kickbacks he was getting to load up the fund with all that toxic garbage?

Comment by Paul in Jax
2007-12-11 08:42:41

Economic justification for nepotism: “We can hire so-and-so’s brother - he has some creds and wants the job, plus we won’t have to pay him as much as if we do a national search - not to mention all the cost and bother of the search - it’ll be cheaper for the state pension in the long run . . .” (Oops.)

 
Comment by Chip
2007-12-11 11:07:47

“…will consider an inside candidate who was once reprimanded by the state.”

“…Coleman Stipanovich, the brother of an influential Republican lobbyist.”

“He has a master of science degree in Criminal Justice Administration from Michigan State University and a bachelor of science in criminology from Florida State University.”

 
 
 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2007-12-11 06:48:11

Santelli: The idea that these huge write-offs are allowing the institutions to get beyond the problems and move on is flawed.

Institutions don’t front-run their accounting. It’s the nature of the beast to always be behind the curve.

Comment by watcher
2007-12-11 07:29:54

Santelli tells the truth; I have no idea how he keeps his job at CNBC.

Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 07:37:16

“The big boys are changing their bets.”
Rick Santelli

 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2007-12-11 10:15:38

I have always wondered how Santelli keeps his job and I have always liked the guy .Somehow with that big smile he has on his face all the time he delivers good news or bad news in a pleasing manner .In fact ,that big smile he has on his face all the time almost makes you think you should not take anything to serious because its all a game .

 
 
Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 07:33:28

SSSHHHH!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 10:53:43

“The idea that these huge write-offs are allowing the institutions to get beyond the problems and move on is flawed.”

I guess he just doesn’t get the concept of kitsch-and-sink accounting?

 
 
Comment by Yossarian
2007-12-11 07:11:32

Txchick:
You think you met the dumbest person in America here online? Well, the guy who bought the house next door to me certainly qualifies, too. Paid 700k for a five bdrm mcmansion on a lot so tiny, he doesn’t have a yard. It’s the highest priced home ever sold in the neighborhood, by more than 250k. It’s almost a three story home in a wooded neighborhood with very few two story homes.
Apparently has no money left for curtains, either. Every morning and evening I get to watch him or his wife take a bath,or do their hair in the mirror. I can see them from my kitchen. My ‘welcome’ gift is going to be a list of real estate blogs like this one, and a coupon for Bed and Bath miniblinds. The neighborhood folks are taking bets about how long they’ll last.

Comment by txchick57
2007-12-11 07:18:53

I hope the show is worth watching!

 
Comment by phillygal
2007-12-11 09:01:32

Every morning and evening I get to watch him or his wife take a bath,

Is he hot?

 
 
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2007-12-11 07:22:40

Hey, I just “Goldilocks” being pulled down the street in a “Radio Flyer” wagon by Ben Bernanke, the wheels look a little wobbly, but…if she makes it over “desperation summit” …it’ll be all down hill to the harbor & the “Good-Ship-Lollipop” … I guess we’ll find out if all things made in China… can last the high velocity plunge ;-)

 
Comment by txchick57
Comment by matt
2007-12-11 08:37:51

Vix trading range 20 to 30? S&P 1400 retest coming?

Comment by txchick57
2007-12-11 11:08:21

Who knows. Looks to me like they can’t wait to launch the buy programs. I don’t care. I have a few beta longs and June index puts. Just trying to stay awake.

 
 
 
Comment by AZgolfer
2007-12-11 07:25:31

On the local news here in Phoenix - Plastic surgery is down due to the slow down in home sales and reduction of prices.

House two doors down from me - Starting price about 8 month ago 239K - then 229K - then the house accross the street sold for 215K. New price 212K - now 195K. If they had listed for 215K to start it would have sold. TOTAL GREED!

Comment by txchick57
Comment by aladinsane
2007-12-11 07:44:15

Saw a mountain lion last week…

A juvenile, perhaps a year old.

 
Comment by Former FB
2007-12-11 08:41:07

“This cougar got more than she bargained for”

Yeah, that mountain lion could have really hurt her.

 
Comment by AnnScott
2007-12-11 09:52:09

We have cougars around here. In the winter, they have been seen cutting right through the village and around houses.

Last Feb. I was home alone and around 10PM my 2 Kuvasz went nuts - tore through the house belly to the ground on full alert heading for the French Doors. I threw the door open and let them go. Now these are big dogs about 29 -30 inches at the shoulder and 115-120 lbs. - herd guarding breed that was bred to protect the herds from predators and able to take on a pack of wolves or take out a mountain lion. They have the most 2nd powerful bite of all dog breeds and can clamp at 1200 lbs psi.

They exploded through the door and were moving so fast they touched down once as they crossed the 12′ deck. They tore through yard side by side and then , when they reached the edge of their electric fence, they seperated by moving into positions so that the yard perimeter was split in thirds. Then they hit the guard stance - think wolf ready to attack with rear end dropped, hackles up, head snaked out, eyes scary flat but make it white with a long coat - and just roared which is different from a bark. They wouldn’t come back when I called and held position for nearly 5 minutes roaring every 30 seconds or so and swinging their heads to the left as if tracking something. Then they relaxed and turned and trotted back to the house.

The next day, a neighbor mentioned that 2 days before a cougar had run right past him when he had walked down his backyard to watch the sun come up over the lake. The US National Park rangers came over and checked the footprints in the snow (all of 150 feet from the back door.) Yep, it had been a cougar upsetting my dogs.

In a contest between a cougar and 2 Kuvasz who would be fighting back to back, my money is easily on the dogs. Glad the big kitty went on its way - wouldn’t want to see it hurt.

Comment by Chip
2007-12-11 11:15:30

OK, I’ll buy a 2-on-1 victory. How would it go, 1-to-1?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by AnnScott
2007-12-11 12:46:23

1::1 - money is still on the Kuvasz. Breed has ben clocked at 35 mph in short bursts so they are fast. All that jaw power. Impervious to pain - well, they had to be to do their jobs alone with the herds day after day so they had to be tough. Don’t back done and don’t give up - herding guarding (different from herding dogs) were bred to literally self-sacrifice to protect their charges and will go to the death if need be. Thick double coat so anything trying to bite through it will get snarled - having to brush it makes me think up reasons why the job can wait.

Only breed that is tougher, faster and has a more powerful bite is the Rhodesian Ridgeback - breed to guard the herds in Africa and hunt down the predators and the only breed that can take on a lion and win.

samk- no they don’t hunt. This breed is strictly a guarding breed. Mine are uncle and nephew. Had the nephew first - he is my mobility assistance dog since I permanently ruined my shoulder in a sports injury and he does carrying in backpacks, carting, dragging sleds or duffle bags (moving what I can not) and balance assistance when I get dizzy from chronic pain. Uncle is a retired AKC champion who came to me after his owner was killed in a car crash.

Still bet on the dog on 1::1. Cougars aaround here go about 60-100 lbs - less than the dog and they are shorter. Watched my younger dog decide a huge German Shepherd needed to get down the road - didn’t approve of the dog having his head near my leg and making growly noises. The young dog shot forward, slammed into the GSD chest to chest and literally knocked him back 6 feet, then shoved him another 15 and ended up on top by just going over him - but he never bit.

Neat breed. Fabulous with kids. Very loyal. Protective but not hair-trigger. We are in the middle of a US National Park. The law enforcement rangers, deputies and state police all adore my guys. They say these dogs didn’t read the book on reasonable force -they wrote it and can be relied upon to handle a problem correctly. Couple times we have had creeps accosting women on the beach - law enforcement rangers are too few to do much so they ask if I would take my dogs walking in those areas. It worked. Bad guys met Kuvasz. Kuvasz did the ‘go ahead and make my day’ thing. Creeps fled and did not return.

 
Comment by auger-inn
2007-12-11 14:54:37

They sound like a great breed and a good pick for your location.
I have two goldens and they are great dogs, not great protectors though. The older one stands his ground and would probably do something if my wife was attacked. The younger, bigger one is afraid of his own shadow.

I lived down in Texas while in flight school and my girlfriend at the time was living with me. She talked me into getting an AKC doberman (which she took when we split up). We raised it around a lot of kids and never cropped the ears or tail so it didn’t look vicious. It used to like to swim and play with the kids, hardly ever barked, so we never considered it a guard dog or a threat to anyone.
My girlfriend waitressed at a bar and one night three of the patrons decided to follow her home. I was out at a trainer on base. She heard them jimmying the door so she grabbed the phone in the bedroom, turned off the lights and hid in the closet while calling the police. She had tried to pull the dog in with her but he just sat down in the foyer staring at the door. This dog was one of those really big dobermans. I forget what it was called but it was at least 100pds and about a foot across at the shoulders, just massive for a doberman, almost rottweiler in stature.
At any rate, these three guys busted in the door to a dark apartment with this silent dog about 6 ft back in the shadows.
When I got home there were police cars with their lights on in the parking area so I assumed there was a domestic going on somewhere in the complex. I picked up the blood spots about a hundred feet from my apartment and it was a mess going up the flight of stairs to my place. The first 3 feet of wall in the apartment were splattered with blood, that’s as far as they got. Apparently the dog never barked or growled the whole time. We always felt he wasn’t interested in discouraging them from coming in. At any rate, I never worried about leaving her alone with the dog around. They picked up two of the three at the ER trying to get stitches, they ratted out the 3rd guy.

They never got but about 4 ft into the hallway

 
Comment by spike66
2007-12-11 17:52:39

Augur,
amazing story. What a great dog.
I have dogs, a pair of rescued street mutts, and I guess their best would be to bark like crazy and throw themselves against the door. They just don’t have a doberman’s DNA.
I’m curious though, is there any liability for a dog’s injuring an intruder? In some states, shooting someone breaking into your home can get you into hot water. Do you know?

 
Comment by auger-inn
2007-12-11 19:55:47

I honestly don’t know spike. The cops didn’t seem at all concerned about any liability issues while taking the report but this was a while back. The guys were hispanic and may not have been in the country legally to boot. We have legal folks on the blog better suited to answer that question.

 
Comment by sd renter
2007-12-11 20:17:49

When you shoot an intruder, kill the bastard with the first shot, then shoot a hole in the ceiling right above you with the 2nd shot.

You tell the cops you fired a warning shot and he still kept coming. Case closed.

 
Comment by Chip
2007-12-11 20:20:57

Ann — I’ll buy into the value of the breed. I spent time in Rhodesia and know Ridgebacks well. Wouldn’t call them the most brilliant breed (the female I liked but did not own died from eating too may rocks), but they were loyal and tough. You could use them for a stepstool if you didn’t have one handy. Broad, tough shoulders. Fullbacks.

 
Comment by spike66
2007-12-11 21:55:41

Sd renter,
great answer, thanks. i hope just having a couple of 50 pound street mutts in the apt. is a deterrent. It’s illegal in nyc to keep handguns, though am waiting to see what the supremes have to say on the subject soon.

 
 
Comment by samk
2007-12-11 12:05:49

Do your dogs hunt to survive?

My money would be on the cat.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by bluprint
2007-12-11 13:22:58

Animals aren’t human. Instinct over rides practice.

 
Comment by samk
2007-12-11 18:39:59

Instinct tempered by experience trumps pure instinct every time. That’s why there are poison arrow frog mimics.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by vozworth
2007-12-11 07:26:58

here’s a little anecdote for all the “hard money loan crowd”

I am 4 days away from establishing a lien on a lovely Prevost bus conversion to the tune of 14k (plus another 2k for storage). The owner of the bus walks into the biz and starts to tell me he has hard money loans tied up in Canada, and cant get the moeny out to pay the bill on his engine overhaul from August.

So he brings out the pictures of his toys…. Harley Davidson Panhead he says is worth 15k, or a ford failane thats all nice and tidy…. I just chuckle, and tell him cash will do just fine.

The reality of the bubble is starting to hit people right in the mouth, and the sale of all the goodies is only just beginning. So get ready people… if you ever wanted “stuff” its about to be firesale time.

Comment by hd74man
2007-12-11 09:02:00

RE: Harley Davidson Panhead he says is worth 15k,

Take his title to the PanHead in payment.

Pan in the hand is worth more than a bush of fiat paper.

Comment by vozworth
2007-12-11 10:20:52

I want the bus…..its worth 70k..

no money in four days= I get the bus….. we’ll see who ponies up for the motorcycle.

Comment by not a gator
2007-12-11 11:29:55

lmao … I’d take the bus too :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by WatchingTheSagaUnfold
2007-12-11 13:59:02

It’s a great time to buy or sell a Panhead.

 
 
Comment by Not your typical FB
2007-12-11 12:09:01

Thanks to this blog, which I have been reading now for 6 months, I put my 4runner up for sale in August. It took almost 4 weeks to sell it at or just below book value. I am grateful we finally unloaded it when we did. I realized the seriousness of the housing bubble and its widespread effects when I started reading HBB and that inspired me to get rid of my bank-owned car and keep my 11 year-old paid for car. My only regret is that I now have a house to sell in March. After that, we are putting our money into something safe (gold??) and expatriating to my husband’s beautiful homeland of Costa Rica. There’s a housing bubble there too (more of a land bubble) so we’ll just wait for it to fully pop before buying there, or build a very nice 3/2 house for 70k. Some people say I’ve become a doom-and-gloomer, I say I just have all the facts!

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 07:30:25

Dismal scientists join the herd of gloomsters preaching recession risk. My guess is that the recession has already arrived, or else these guys would not be talking about it.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119725543833319010.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news

Comment by sf jack
2007-12-11 11:29:55

Diane Swonk?

From the article:

“Fed officials have ‘to move to show their willingness to both avert risk of recession and stabilize the financial crisis,’ said Diane Swonk of Mesirow Financial. She said Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke’s emphasis on consensus has proved to be the central bank’s ‘weak spot in crisis mode. Now they need to show conviction instead of consensus.’”

******

Why, I ask… is anyone listening to Diane Swonk these days?

Why? And especially the WSJ - are they journalists - or just a bunch of lap dogs?

The time for conviction was several years ago, when the Fed should have been reversing its free money policy.

For if they had done just that, perhaps Diane Swonk wouldn’t have said something so asinine as this:

“I just don’t think we have what it takes to prick the bubble… I don’t think prices are going to fall, and I don’t think they’re even going to be flat.”

Diane C. Swonk, chief economist at Mesirow Financial in Chicago
The New York Times, “Trading Places: Real Estate Instead of Dot-Coms” 3/25/05

 
 
Comment by dennisd
2007-12-11 07:38:17

Marketwatch: “13 reasons Bush’s bailout won’t stop recession”

http://tinyurl.com/25q4ua

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 07:53:19

An interesting editorial in this morn’s FT.

“….The credit squeeze is having new effects on bank capital. First, many loans have been turned into securities, and now have to be marked to market. Whereas 20 years ago banks would sit on a dodgy mortgage until it actually defaulted, now they have to mark it down in line with market expectations of default. That means that pressure on bank capital is starting earlier than in previous downturns.

Second, under the old Basel I capital adequacy rules, banks needed a fixed amount of capital no matter the point in the cycle. A $100m corporate loan required $8m in bank capital. Yet under the new Basel II rules, designed to stop banks gaming the system, the capital required depends on the probability that a loan will default. That probability goes up in a downturn – and so does the capital requirement.

Third, the old reasons to raise capital in a downturn are even more important when rumours ricochet around the world in seconds via the internet. Capital reassures nervous depositors and allows strong banks to exploit a competitive advantage over their weaker peers. Balance sheet flexibility can make cheap acquisitions possible.

Finally, if for all of these reasons banks expect their competitors will want to raise new capital, it makes sense to get in first. Sovereign wealth funds may have swallowed up shares in Citi and UBS, but even their appetite may be satiated if there is a rush of offerings in 2008.

There is little evidence so far that subprime losses are creating capital constraints for banks. Nor will there be, as long as they can raise as much new money as they want at reasonably attractive prices. But given the strong forces pushing up banks’ demand for capital, even as the economy turns down, it may become a problem next year.”

http://tinyurl.com/247krh

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 07:58:27

Wall Street Journal

Finance jobs expected to rise next year -

“…To avoid repeating history, lending institutions, hedge funds and investment banks are likely to invest more in departments aimed at offsetting such problems, says Michael Woodrow, president and founder of Risk Talent Associates LLC, a New York-based recruiter that places senior professionals in credit, market and operational risk-related positions as well as quantitative and compliance finance jobs. Annual compensation packages range from $75,000 for junior risk analysts to more than $1 million for chief risk officers, he says.

Mr. Woodrow notes that a global commercial bank hired the search firm last month to find a director of risk management for its commodities division. Normally, finance companies hold off trying to fill senior positions until after the New Year because many professionals want to secure their year-end bonuses, he says. But this firm offered to include a bonus equal to what the winning candidate would lose, as well as compensation that is 40% higher than the job’s average pay package of $450,000. “The skill set is in high demand, and it’s a value proposition,” he explains. “If you’re taking millions of dollars worth of risk, you need the right person in there helping you understand that.”
http://tinyurl.com/2mw64b

Comment by Asparagus
2007-12-11 08:19:24

In my former life, I sold risk management tools. It was a huge challenge because:

1.institutional investment firms have huge budgets for performance measurement tools, reporting. They have tiny budgets for risk tools and risk budgeting.
2. Risk managers had absolutely no power. Funds had risk managers for the purpose of being able to say to investors, “we have a risk manager”. The risk manager would let a fund manager that he had really increased his exposure to xyz. The fund manager would say piss off and stay out of my business, I’m here for returns.
3. Firms that wanted to give risk managers teeth had problems figuring out where risk falls in the operation. Huge political deal.

Anyway, it will be interesting to watch how firms monitor and act on risk.

 
Comment by txchick57
2007-12-11 08:28:21

I see those jobs on Craigslist if you can believe it. I’ll try to find a listing for you.

Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 08:41:07

Always a growth opportunity in every disaster.

Comment by txchick57
2007-12-11 08:44:44

there’s always a bull market somewhere.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by yensoy
2007-12-12 03:15:15

Yes they will,… in India

 
 
Comment by Ria Rhodes
2007-12-11 08:29:18

“H&R Block said its second-quarter pretax loss from discontinued operations was $551.2 million, which included losses on the sale of whole mortgage loans, impairment charges on mortgage-related assets, and restructuring charges.”

H&R “blockheads” is more like it. Tax return preparation for mostly low income, unsophisticated filers on one hand, and high risk market gambles to maximize profits for the crooks at the top of the company on the other. Guess it backfired on them and their shareholders. Time to cast anchor for the Cayman Islands Mr.Blockhead.

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 08:31:18

“By changing the way it handles delinquent mortgages backing the securities it guarantees, Freddie Mac is avoiding immediate recognition of market losses that it believes understate the salvageability of such loans, thereby preserving capital.

The government-sponsored enterprise said Monday that capital concerns had prompted it to raise the bar for buying past-due loans out of securitized pools. Before, Freddie would generally repurchase loans after four months of delinquency; now its policy is to do so only under more extreme circumstances, such as a foreclosure or modification.

Freddie must advance principal and interest payments on nonperformers that remain in its pools to bondholders. The GSE said it would rather do that than take a mark-to-market hit when it puts a delinquent loan on its balance sheet. Most such loans are eventually cured or prepaid, Freddie said, while the market losses deplete capital — something it is trying hard to shore up right now.

Freddie’s move follows a recent decision by Fannie Mae to stop including mark-to-market losses on repurchased delinquent loans when calculating its loss ratios. (On Monday, Fannie would not discuss its policy for purchasing delinquent loans.)…

Freddie has complained that market values for delinquent loans do not reflect its expectations for losses on such assets. “We think there’s a lot of panic affecting those markets at the moment,” said Sharon McHale, a spokeswoman for Freddie.

However, she downplayed the role that factor had in Freddie’s decision to change its buyout policy. “That’s not really what’s driving this,” she said. “We’re not getting rid of the loans, we’re just accounting for them differently.” …
americanbanker.com
American Banker
11 December
Free registration

Comment by Chip
2007-12-11 11:21:44

Must be nice to be able to write your own rules. How do you audit that?

 
 
Comment by Kathy
2007-12-11 08:44:44

I just got the January issue of Chicago Magazine in the mail yesterday. Some interesting tidbits in the “Deal Estate” section:

1. Susan Crown’s (of the billionaire Crown family) Gold Coast mansion sold for $5.3 million, down from an asking price of $7.5 million.

2. Blair Hull’s (failed Senatorial candidate) Lincoln Park mansion sold for $1.73 million. He bought it in 2003 for $2.75 million.

3. Saving the best for last. Construction has been halted on the 41,000 square foot Burr Ridge mansion being built by Nick Memeti of Freedom Mortgage. He was the idiot all over the radio calling serial refinancing the “biggest no-brainer of all time”.

Comment by Sabrina
2007-12-11 11:13:41

Kathy: Thanks for the Chicago comments. Prices are coming down on lots of the Gold Coast and Lincoln Park mansions. But I haven’t been seeing losses like the one mentioned for Blair Hull’s LP mansion in awhile.

Lincoln Park is “prime.” I thought prices never went down in “prime” areas?

Sales are down in the luxury market. There are simply too many homes and condos in that price range on the market now.

Comment by Kathy
2007-12-11 11:33:24

I live in Elmhurst. The luxury market went crazy here. We went from less than five $1 million + homes sold a year six or seven years ago to more than 60 on the market (not sold) now. In my neighborhood new home prices went from $650,000 to $1.15 million in about six years. Surprising there are a few knife catchers out there as some of them have sold recently (though not enough to make a dent in the inventory).

 
 
Comment by WatchingTheSagaUnfold
2007-12-11 15:25:50

‘Susan Crown’s (of the billionaire Crown family) Gold Coast mansion sold for $5.3 million, down from an asking price of $7.5 million.’

I feel really bad for her and other Crowns. I may just have to pay it forward tomorrow and really care about what happens to all that is gilded.

 
 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2007-12-11 08:53:14

I’ll see you in my American Dreams

And then I’ll hold you in my dreams

Someone took you right out of my a.r.m.’s

Still I feel the thrill of your charms

Ships sink all the time

Legal tender once did shine

It will give many a nightmare tonight

I’ll see you in my dreams

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCrOZLFyxH4&feature=related

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 08:53:42

Why oil will not drop below $70/BBL

Rise in costs puts pressure on returns

By Javier Blas in Abu Dhabi

Published: December 4 2007

“Exploration companies need oil prices of $70 a barrel to match the returns they made at $30 a barrel just two years ago because of the sharp increase in costs and higher government licence fees, according to analysis by a leading consultancy.

The research, from Wood Mackenzie, the Edinburgh-based oil consultants, helps explain why non-Opec oil production is failing to accelerate its annual growth significantly in spite of record prices. Oil prices have been above $70 a barrel only since September….

Governments have also driven up costs as the price of exploration licences for new acreage in prospective basins has surged. One of the main reasons for this has been the greater use of public bidding rounds in which some oil companies have bid aggressively in order to secure rights to explore….”
http://tinyurl.com/3b5g9y

“…higher government license fees” a stealth tax imposed as a result of higher prices. The government loves inflation. Oil exploration and finds have dropped 43%. (600,000 BBL/day)

Comment by watcher
2007-12-11 11:41:10

The main reason of course if peak oil. Every country in the world that is open about its production is reporting a permanent decline; Mexico, USA, Norway, North Sea, etc. The Saudis simply lie about their reserves.

Comment by josemanolo7
2007-12-11 16:58:30

hwat about the biggest of them all? russia.

 
 
 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2007-12-11 08:57:23

What does anyone thing about the weakness in copper? It bounced off $3 last week and FCX seems to be bullish, buying back stock, but the fact is it’s off 25% from its highs at the beginning of the year and inventories are piling up. More of a demand problem (global construction) or a supply glut?

http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20602013&sid=aepZ9C1C37KU&refer=commodity_futures

Comment by watcher
2007-12-11 11:53:01

FCX is diversified metals, moly, even gold. I bought some a couple weeks ago. Metals are in a long-term bull market and I won’t try to trade it based on copper prices.

Comment by Paul in Jax
2007-12-11 17:57:34

I caught the run in FCX last week, too, and made it out at the top - because they get 80% of their profits from CU. I’m generally bullish on commodities, but I think it may be a long time before we see $3.80 copper again.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 13:19:08

“What does anyone thing about the weakness in copper?”

Doesn’t new home construction require lots of copper wiring?

 
 
Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 09:04:35

Whither goes the dollar?

Adjustment or affliction? Why the dollar’s drop is failing to rebalance the world

By Chris Giles

Published: December 10 2007

“…The tensions that Mr King, eurozone officials and US politicians refer to when they talk about currencies all relate to the ad hoc global system of currency regimes that has developed over the past decade. In a set-up often dubbed “Bretton Woods II”, after the fixed exchange rate system that ran from the second world war to the early 1970s, advanced economies operate floating exchange rates while emerging countries manage their currencies’ value, generally against the dollar.

Trade surpluses in China and among oil producing nations are ploughed back into US assets to prevent the currencies from rising; the system, much to many economists’ surprise, has proved enduring and comfortable. The flow of savings to the US fosters low worldwide real interest rates and high US consumption.

Everyone knows it is not indefinitely sustainable. As the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development warned last week, foreign investors will not put up with low returns on their US holdings for ever and their willingness to fund US borrowing will wane as the country becomes a smaller part of the global economy….”

FT
http://tinyurl.com/373mzo

There are some excellent graphs and well worth reading the entire comment.

Comment by watcher
2007-12-11 11:48:47

They are already running away from the dollar; Iran is off dollars completely. Today we see this:

Bahrain to ditch dollar peg:

Bahrain will move towards tracking the dinar against a currency basket rather the US dollar, without changing the exchange rate, Al-Wasat newspaper quoted the finance minister as telling the advisory Shura Council.

The Finance Ministry declined to comment on the report which contained the latest in a stream of contradictory remarks from policymakers that have kept markets guessing. Other papers carried some of the remarks, including Al-Ayyam, which usually follows the official line.

http://tinyurl.com/2dd7xa

Only fools hold dollars.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 13:29:27

The falling dollar
Losing faith in the greenback
Nov 29th 2007
From The Economist print edition
How long will the dollar remain the world’s premier currency?

http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10208445

 
 
Comment by txchick57
2007-12-11 09:04:37

Ya’ll should relate to this.

http://www.minyanville.com/articles/index/a/15167

Comment by matt
2007-12-11 09:16:39
 
 
Comment by takingbets
2007-12-11 09:19:53

here we go again, already looking forward to the next meeting and pricing in more rate cuts!?!!??? why dont they just drop it to zero and get it over with!!!!!!

Fed Expected to Cut Interest Rate Today
Tuesday December 11, 11:14 am ET
By Martin Crutsinger, AP Economics Writer
Fed Expected to Cut Interest Rates for 3rd Straight Time to Address Mortgage Crisis

WASHINGTON (AP) — Faced with a spreading mortgage crisis, the Federal Reserve is expected to cut interest rates for a third time and hint that even more rate cuts could be forthcoming.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071211/fed_interest_rates.html?.v=11

Comment by nhz
2007-12-11 12:34:23

why dont they just drop it to zero and get it over with!!!!!!

when they arrive at zero they can continue with negative rates, Bernanke has already written about this possibility several years ago, e.g. they could introduce a 1% monthly tax on all savings accounts (not radically new, because effectively there already is a 0.5% or so monthly tax on savings, both in the US and Europe).

Comment by rj
2007-12-11 13:08:27

When the Fed announced they were only cutting a quarter-point, the market booed!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 13:16:57

‘…e.g. they could introduce a 1% monthly tax on all savings accounts (not radically new, because effectively there already is a 0.5% or so monthly tax on savings, both in the US and Europe).’

No need to do something so politically unpopular as explicitly taxing savings. The inflation tax on savings is doing a fine job and not raising too much political opposition (esp. since it is primarily the volatile food and energy CPI components where inflation is showing up).

 
 
 
Comment by takingbets
2007-12-11 09:44:02

Falling into the liquidity trap

Commentary: Economy’s problem isn’t lack of money; it’s lack of confidence
By Dr. Irwin Kellner, MarketWatch
Last update: 12:04 a.m. EST Dec. 11, 2007

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/falling-liquidity-trap/story.aspx?guid=%7B06D7C105%2D44C5%2D4251%2D8BF4%2D225AFF376CF6%7D

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 11:01:35

“…it’s lack of confidence”

I call BS on this ideological perspective. The problem is a loss of TRUST, something the financial engineering community may never be able to grasp, given that it is ethical problem rather than an engineering problem.

Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 12:45:41

The problem is no friggin moneys. Why else would they be short selling their own stocks, selling corporate headquarters (Citigroup). Dr. Kellner doesn’t know what he is writing about.

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 12:57:32

“…no friggin moneys.”

Oh, right, I almost forgot about budget constraints…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 13:41:10

Perhaps the problem was an excess of confidence — that the Fed would cut by 1/2 pt.

 
 
 
Comment by takingbets
2007-12-11 09:46:05

Americans split on mortgage bailout

Only a slight majority of Americans want to see special treatment for those at risk of default; most blame borrowers for woes.

http://money.cnn.com/2007/12/11/news/economy/cnn_mortgage_poll/index.htm?source=yahoo_quote

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 10:58:55

“…most blame borrowers for woes.”

At least the lending industry gets this consolation out of the rate freeze proposal…

 
 
Comment by takingbets
Comment by Paul in Jax
2007-12-11 11:09:08

Toll Brothers is also a big player in the colossal failure Nocatee near Jacksonville which I mentioned a week ago. Toll’s brilliant theme: Country club-style McMansions in the middle of nowhere in the 450-700K range.

I’m not an accountant, but I believe there is a lot of leeway in terms of capitalizing infrastructure and initial development costs. If this stuff were to be written off based on current expectations it would have to cause a tremendous hit.

Comment by matt
2007-12-11 14:38:03

They are carrying the inventory hoping the bottom is near. They only wrote down 315M, next writedown might be triple that.

 
 
 
Comment by takingbets
2007-12-11 09:59:00

Freddie Mac expects $10-12 billion credit losses
Tuesday December 11, 11:53 am ET

“We have seen a ton of foreclosures but we have not seen a lot of pictures of people standing in front of their house with their furniture on the front lawn saying ‘What am I going to do?” he said.

“As that starts to happen, and it will happen, I am afraid of the impact that this has,” he said, citing a risk that a public concern over the housing market could curtail consumer spending.

“Household wealth in housing is about $21 trillion. It does not take a big shift in consumer confidence, in consumers worrying about things, for it to have an effect on the economy. I think it will get worse before it gets better,” he said.

http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/071211/usa_subprime_freddie.html?.v=4

Comment by Housing Wizard
2007-12-11 10:32:19

Maybe they should have a Hollywood telethon and raise money for the poor homeless people to get them into a place to rent . Of course this is after the FB’s trashed the house and lived cost free for months knowing they were up-side down . Seems to me if the FB didn’t lose their job ,they would have a lot of money saved up to move on to a rental . Some of these FB’s are buying new houses before they default on their old house .

 
 
Comment by merce
2007-12-11 10:21:52

Sub prime losses update
UBS: $13.5bn
Freddie Mac: $12bn
Citigroup: $11bn
Merrill Lynch: $8bn
Morgan Stanley $3.7bn
HSBC: $3.4bn
Bear Stearns: $3.2bn
Deutsche Bank: $3.2bn
Bank of America: $3bn
Barclays: $2.6bn
Royal Bank of Scotland: $2.6bn
Credit Suisse: $1bn
Wachovia: $1.1bn
IKB: $1bn

Source: Company reports

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 10:55:37

What’s a few $ bn in losses between friends?

 
 
Comment by Chip
2007-12-11 10:46:05

“The sole goal of the freeze is to prevent owners of mortgage-backed securities, many of them foreigners, from suing U.S. banks and forcing them to buy back worthless mortgage securities at face value - right now almost 10 times their market worth.

“The ticking time bomb in the U.S. banking system is not resetting subprime mortgage rates. The real problem is the contractual ability of investors in mortgage bonds to require banks to buy back the loans at face value if there was fraud in the origination process.

“The goal of the freeze may be to delay bond investors from suing by putting off the big foreclosure wave for several years. But it may also be to stop bond investors from suing. If the investors agreed to loan modifications with the “real” wage and asset information from refinancing borrowers, mortgage originators and bundlers would have an excuse once the foreclosure occurred. They could say, “Fraud? What fraud?! You knew the borrower’s real income and asset information later when he refinanced!”

From the San Fran Chronicle
http://tinyurl.com/343tc2

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 10:57:11

“The goal of the freeze may be to delay bond investors from suing by putting off the big foreclosure wave for several years.”

I don’t see how the rate freeze prevents law suits over severely devalued assets. The elephant is no longer hidden under the rug at this point — refer to the ABX indexes if you have any questions.

Comment by Chip
2007-12-11 11:37:45

I think the writer was implying that the banksters can sucker the investors into either a form of complicity that would prevent suits or a “you-waited-too-long” trap.

 
 
 
Comment by merce
2007-12-11 10:57:59

insanity is a $570,000 beach hut

Comment by merce
2007-12-11 11:12:04
Comment by FP
2007-12-11 16:31:33

It’s a Tuff Shed

 
 
 
Comment by neuromance
2007-12-11 11:15:48

“In my opinion, the number one priority in resolving today’s mortgage crisis is to bring the housing market back to equilibrium. Equilibrium means prices that are in line with incomes, with supply and demand in balance. With equilibrium prices, houses could be readily bought and sold. When houses can be readily bought and sold, mortgage loans are backed by valid collateral. When mortgage loans are backed by valid collateral, investors will once again be able to trust securities backed by pools of mortgages. Only when we reach that point will the “subprime crisis” be behind us.”

http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=121007A

Comment by Chip
2007-12-11 11:46:41

This writer’s idea of “OK” borrowing is six times income. Check this:

“Next, assume that you make a rent vs. buy calculation by figuring that you need an inflation-adjusted return on housing investment of 4 percent per year. The price/rent ratio is 100 divided by the required return. 100/4 = 25, suggesting that the price/rent ratio should be 25.

“Historically, price/rent ratios in the housing market have been lower–closer to 15. I am not sure why it has been so low. Perhaps it reflects high transaction costs in the housing market–real estate commissions and all of the ‘junk fees’ that afflict home buyers.

“If my figure for the price/rent ratio of 25 is correct, then a household that would spend $12,000 a year on rent should buy a house for 25 times that amount, or $300,000. If the price/rent ratio should be 15, then that household should spend no more than $180,000 on a house. Those are the sorts of house prices that make sense for a household with an income of $48,000.”

Um, not around here (FL). A house that rents for $1,000 a month should sell for $100,000 - $120,000.

 
 
Comment by txchick57
2007-12-11 11:19:01

Hey, Hoz. Here’s a risk job on Craigslist. Kind of a funny place for it.

http://dallas.craigslist.org/acc/466143105.html

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 12:42:23

“…The Senior Credit Analyst will be working in the Chicago office supervising two Credit Analysts. …”

No wonder it is not filled. A piddling risk management job in Chicago. If it was with Fortis or CLSA in Hong Kong, a different story…
Good catch TX!

 
Comment by Mobin_kali
2007-12-11 12:45:41

uhm….anyone looking at the market right now. Straight drop of 210 points.

 
Comment by LeftCAin2004
2007-12-11 12:48:40

Federal Reserve Cuts Key Interest Rate by One-Quarter of a Percentage Point to 4.25 Percent

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071211/fed_interest_rates.html

Dow down by 197 points….

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 12:55:19

Not to worry — time to buy the dip. The stock market always goes up in the long run.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 13:37:17

Despite the big price drop today, the nominal prices of many of these favorite bubble stocks is as high or higher than they were a few weeks ago…

http://www.marketwatch.com/quotes/quotes.aspx?symb=tol+kbh+len+ctx+dhi+fnm+aapl+goog+bzh+phm+sbux+peet

 
 
Comment by VaBeyatch in Virginia Beach
2007-12-11 12:54:43

Craigslist report…. here we are, it’s Christmas time… and the local Craigslist (Hampton Roads / Norfolk VA) is JAMMIN’ with loads of houses for sale. There are offers of new construction with free BMW leases. I can smell desperation in some of the ads. “Seller willing to rent as well!”

So much for the market tapering off until the superbowl!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 13:05:45

Could someone with a calculus background please explain in nontechnical terms what is meant by “discontinuous first derivative?”

http://www.marketwatch.com/

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 13:06:44

And you may also want to offer an explanation of “negatively infinite slope” while you are at it.

Comment by WatchingTheSagaUnfold
2007-12-11 13:21:22

Think of a gap down in stock prices.

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 13:28:05

I am thinking some player with enormous market power decided to fill the gap on all the major U.S. stock market indexes once the DJIA had dropped to around 13,500…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 13:42:21

Collars off again for the last 1/2 hour of the trading day? Oh the humanity!

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 13:11:14

“Objective” reader poll on marketwatch.com; possible responses range from “bitter disappointment” to “mild disapproval”…

Fed rate cut.
Not all questions are answered
Q. Are you disappointed in Tuesday’s quarter-point cuts in the federal funds and discount-window target rates?
- Yes. Bitterly.
- Sure, but I expect more Fed action as required.
- No, a more aggressive reduction would be an overreaction.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 13:12:13

Trading collars appear to have kicked in…

 
Comment by Les Pendens
2007-12-11 14:20:58

..

A discontinuous first derivative is “undefined”.

A first derivative is defined as the slope of a tangent drawn at a point on a curve.

Positive 1st derivatives signify a “concave” curvature ( curve holds coffee ). Negative 1st derivatives signify a “convex” curvature ( curve spills coffee )

Indeterminate 1st derivatives signify a zero rate of change in the denominator of the derivative and are classified as “undefined”.

When plotting delta-y/delta-x it means you have some change in the y values with no corresponding change in the x-values. For each x point there should be one and only one corresponding y point. When you have two (x,y) pairs and both pairs have the same x value it is an undefined ( indeterminate ) form.

Hope this helps.

In a nutshell it indicates discontinuity. Not a good thing. Hints at extreme unpredictability; especially when modelling natural systems.

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 14:49:56

‘A discontinuous first derivative is “undefined”.’

I said in “nontechnical” terms, as in, “Geez, that first derivative of the DJIA’s daily price chart sure did look undefined today around the time of the Fed’s announcement.”

Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 14:54:39

A broken line on a graph. Pointing south.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Gulfstream-sitter
2007-12-11 18:09:51

I’m just hearing clicks and whistles……..:)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2007-12-11 21:50:05

“discontinuous first derivative?”

The curve has a kink in it.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 13:35:02

MARK HULBERT
Fed’s pushing on a string

Why contrarian bond analysis sees another rate cut as inflationary.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/contrarian-analysis-bond-sentiment-ahead/story.aspx?guid=%7BFB20633E%2D4121%2D433A%2D92D5%2DAB0CF1A4D370%7D

 
Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 13:42:45

“Milk and cocoa costs drive up chocolate prices

…The price of most commodities have risen sharply in recent months, thanks to several factors including inclement weather and strong demand from emerging economies such as China and India. This has sparked a swath of price rises from retailers, affecting products from bread and butter to pizza and beer….”
Guardian

And single malts are up 25%!

So for you milk lovers, I am raising the price on milk next month and if you can’t afford it, China can! I am not going without my chocolate, beer and Single Malt from Islay.

Comment by yensoy
2007-12-12 03:23:04

Believe me, milk is CHEAP in the USA.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 13:51:12

Flight to quality noted in T-bond yields…

Notes/Bonds
COUPON MATURITY
DATE CURRENT
PRICE/YIELD PRICE/YIELD
CHANGE TIME
2-Year 3.125 11/30/2009 100-11¼ / 2.94 0-14 / -.231 15:38
5-Year 3.375 11/30/2012 100-07+ / 3.32 1-01¾ / -.233 15:38
10-Year 4.250 11/15/2017 102-06 / 3.98 1-14½ / -.178 15:38
30-Year 5.000 05/15/2037 108-15+ / 4.48 2-14 / -.144 15:38

http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates/index.html

Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 14:04:21

Flight to quality

in three month treasuries
COUPON MATURITYDATE CURRENTPRICE/YIELDPRICE/YIELD
3-Month 0.000 04/01/2008 969.06 / 11.26 0.431 / -0.008

If all goes well - pick up a little over 11% apr on the treasuries and 4% on the dollar collapse. :>)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 17:33:48

It must have been a good day for at least some people named Gross.

 
 
Comment by reuven
2007-12-11 15:23:02

I’m in Orlando this week for my usual one week/month visit to the Sunshine state for business.

The crime down here is unbelievable! Before I see the stats for 2007, it’s anecdotal, of course, but just from watching the 5:00 news it’s amazing what’s going on: A snake-cake deliveryman shot to death, two bodies found (one in pieces!) and the Apopka Wal*Mart is currently locked down while they search for two gunmen.

In Sunnyvale, CA, where i spend most of my time, there’s nothing like this happening. And the population density of the Peninsula is roughly the same as Central FL

As the economy gets worse, it’ll get worse here. The folks here STILL don’t think they’ll start seeing boarded up houses, despite houses sitting empty everywhere. Entire “Specuvestor” developments in Lake County, FL, seem like ghost towns.

After a year of leaky roofs in an empty house (with the shitty construction here, even brand new leak), it’ll probably be so mold infested it’ll have to be bulldozed. And there will be THOUSANDS of homes like this in a year.

Central Florida will look worse than Newark, NJ or the South Bronx ever did!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 15:23:17

San Diego county “Will entertain” range pricing has achieved entertainment status. Got popcorn?

Bedrooms: 4
Full Baths: 2
Partial Baths: 0
Square Feet: 1,411
Lot Size: 8,712 Sq. Ft.
Year Built: 1971
Listing Date: 09/05/07
On Market: 97 days
Type: SFR
Status: ACTIVE
MLS #: 071071080

Description

Seller will entertain offers between $449,900 to $500,000. Meticulously maintained & completely modernized! 1 story on a huge lot! Minutes to the best of escondido. Ideally situated on a cul-de-sac, w/charming curb appeal. Remodeled from floor-to-ceiling, huge backyard w/outdoor kitchen, covered patio, & rv parking.

Clients who viewed this home also viewed:

1464 ESPERANZA WAY
Escondido, CA 92027
Beds/Baths: 4/2 Sq.Ft: 1,680
$299,000

602 MAYWOOD ST.
Escondido, CA 92027
Beds/Baths: 4/2 Sq.Ft: 1,653
$379,900

414 ROBIN HILL LN.
Escondido, CA 92026
Beds/Baths: 3/2 Sq.Ft: 2,009
$310,000

Comment by reuven
2007-12-11 15:37:35

I love that! But i’ll bet I can get more entertainment from offering, say, $325K! He’ll tell me not to “insult” me, and then call me the next month.

 
 
Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 15:24:00

Things are looking up Leigh!!

When is the fund (formerly known as Prince MLEC) no longer a “Super SIV”?

“A banking industry fund to bail out structured investment vehicles exposed to troubled subprime mortgages may only be $30 billion in size, down from recent estimates of $60 billion, CNBC reported on Tuesday.

Bankers working on the fund said “if they’re lucky” they may get $30 billion in assets in the fund, CNBC reported. SIVs are off-balance-sheet funds used by banks to buy high-yielding assets like U.S. mortgages.”

Reuters

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 15:28:46

“$30 billion in assets in the fund, CNBC reported.”

Wasn’t $50 bn the number just yesterday? The anticipated size of the SIV Superfund size shrank by 40 percent in just one day.

Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 15:31:32

No moneys.

 
 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2007-12-11 15:43:23


Defending the Fed decision…

I just listened to Chuck Lieberman, on Boob-berg, who claimed that the housing can’t drag the economy any longer. And what was his reason for saying that? Because, “the [housing] prices can’t go to below zero”! He further said that we are not going to start to tear down buildings because prices have gone down.

What a moron. If housing prices go down 70% from the peak, let alone to zero, the financial system will collapse because at least 30M “homeowners” will be below water. Once the total defaults reach 10M homes in the US the financial system will be insolvent and the economy will be in depression.

These bubble-meisters don’t know when to stop the bullish propaganda.

Jas

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 17:31:28

‘Because, “the [housing] prices can’t go to below zero”!’

This dumbchuck doesn’t understand the difference between levels and rates of change. The rate of change in housing prices (the first derivative) is negative with no end in sight, and this is the reason nobody should be in a hurry to buy a home at the moment (aside from the fact that almost nobody could afford one even if the prices weren’t dropping).

Come to think of it, the headline U.S. stock market indexes have showed some recent tendency towards negative first derivatives as well…

 
Comment by Gulfstream-sitter
2007-12-11 18:19:58

Can’t go to zero?, Sure it can, if you consider the “intangibles”

Examples: Abandoned properties in high crime/low job areas, closed oil refinery sites, anyplace with contaminated ground water.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 17:38:35

Dollar falls sharply as US stocks dive
December 12, 2007

THE Australian dollar dropped sharply after Wall Street tumbled amid concerns the Federal Reserve’s cut in interest rates should have been deeper.

The local currency was at US87.19 cents in early trade, off a low of US87.14 cents but down from yesterday’s close of US88.67. Overnight, it had almost reached US89 cents.

The Aussie dollar had been at US88.94 cents just before the Fed’s announcement.

The US Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) voted 9-1 to cut interest rates by 25 basis points to 4.25 per cent and analysts said it had left the door open for further reductions.

But Wall Street stocks tumbled after the Fed’s decision, which was widely expected. Some investors had expected the US central bank to cut rates by half a percentage point.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22911364-643,00.html

Comment by Paul in Jax
2007-12-11 18:10:48

Party over for Canadian, Aussie, and Kiwi dollar. But, perspective: there are more people living in Vietnam (or Thailand, or Phillipines, or an average Chinese province) than those three countries combined.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 17:39:38

The Short View: So much for the Bernanke put
By John Authers in New York

Published: December 11 2007 20:19 | Last updated: December 11 2007 20:19

So much for the Bernanke put. The Federal Open Market Committee did what everyone expected, and cut the Fed Funds rate by 0.25 percentage points to 4.25 per cent.

But the market reacted with crushing disappointment. The S&P financials index dropped 4 per cent in instant reaction, and bond yields plummeted. Most importantly, the money market suggested that the Libor rate, at which banks lend to each other and which usually closely tracks Fed Funds, would rise significantly this morning.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/8e8f604e-a825-11dc-9485-0000779fd2ac,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F0%2F8e8f604e-a825-11dc-9485-0000779fd2ac.html&_i_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fhome%2Fus

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 17:42:54

Freeze plan may help deepen the crisis: Bianco
Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:27pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. Treasury plan to freeze interest rates on certain subprime mortgages will not help the banking system avert losses and prevent housing prices from falling, said Jim Bianco, president of Bianco Research.

“All these plans are designed to keep reality from happening. And reality is that the losses are much worse than we all expected,” Bianco said at the Reuters Investment Outlook 2008 Summit in New York.

“This is an environment where the problem is credit and the fed funds rate is not going to help solve that problem,” he said. “To begin with, lower interest rates got us where we are now. The Fed may be trying to solve the problem of a bubble burst by creating another bubble.”

Short-term market interest rates should be following fed funds, but that has not been the case in the past couple of months, Bianco said. Instead, the correlation of such rates and the London interbank offered rate (LIBOR) is increasing. This means short-term borrowers are experiencing a tightening since market-based rates are rising.

“I do believe there’s a role for the Fed in this crisis, but it would be more targeted to fixing the spread between fed funds and LIBOR,” he added.

http://www.reuters.com/article/InvestmentOutlook08/idUSN1120700420071211

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 17:44:18

Pantry raid…

Concerns over food inflation as harvests fail
By Javier Blas and Chris Flood in London
Published: December 11 2007 19:49 | Last updated: December 11 2007 19:49

The global economy is facing a second wave of food inflation after the US agriculture department on Tuesday warned of significant falls in stocks of corn, wheat and soyabean and heavy demand.

Officials forecast US wheat stocks would shrink to their lowest level in 60 years, dropping from 312m bushels to 280m by the end of the 2007-08 crop year.

http://www.reuters.com/article/InvestmentOutlook08/idUSN1120700420071211

Comment by Hoz
2007-12-11 18:14:05

Corn 08Mar 424′0 up 6′2 ($4.24/)
Soybeans 08Jan 1135′4 up 9′6 ($11.355/)
Wheat 08Mar 910′4 down 19′0 ($9.105/)
Oats 08Mar 291′4 up 7′4 ($2.915/)

It will be interesting how wheat reacts tomorrow. The lowest level since the Marshall plan was feeding Europe. Not good for our future.

Comment by vozworth
2007-12-11 20:39:00

Im feelin very cautious…….

lets bring the food down and run the energy back up.

 
 
 
Comment by vozworth
2007-12-11 20:51:17

Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, Dennis Washington, Buss, Pickens, Waltons…. they aint bailin out the banks…

its the who? Petro Sheiks?

Whose to buy Rio Tinto…isnt that Australia?….CIC. the Chinese Soverign fun… I wonder what a Chinese flag ship gets to do when it shows up in Sydney?

does the fun ever start?

Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 23:22:14

Quote of the day (Buffett):

“You can’t turn a financial toad (into a prince) by kissing it or by securitizing it or by transferring its ownership to somebody else,”

However, I submit it is possible for a prince to turn into a financial toad (Citi…).

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 23:34:22

Fed set to revamp liquidity support
By Krishna Guha in Washington and Michael Mackenzie in New York
Published: December 11 2007 19:17 | Last updated: December 12 2007 05:01

The Federal Reserve is set to overhaul the way it provides liquidity support to financial markets, following a negative reaction to Tuesday’s interest rate cut.

US stocks fell sharply after the central bank cut rates by only 25 basis points to 4.25 per cent and failed to offer a clear signal of more to come.

The overhaul, which could be announced as early as Wednesday, is likely to take the shape of a new liquidity facility that will auction loans to banks. This would allow the Fed to provide liquidity directly to a large number of financial institutions against a wide range of collateral without the stigma of its existing discount window loans.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6bcfd8ee-a80d-11dc-9485-0000779fd2ac.html

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 23:36:07

Can rate cuts really prevent a recession? If so, how come Japan was in a recession from 1990-????, despite rate cuts all the way to zero?

Asian markets disappointed with Fed rate cut
By Andrew Wood in Hong Kong

Published: December 12 2007 01:11 | Last updated: December 12 2007 04:48

Shares fell across the Asia Pacific region on Wednesday as investors seemed worried by the US Federal Reserve’s statement that the US economy was slowing, and were concerned that its 25 basis point cut in interest rates may not be big enough to prevent a recession.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c25d3b94-a84d-11dc-9485-0000779fd2ac.html

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2007-12-11 23:39:04

Executive confidence
Doom and gloom
Dec 11th 2007
From Economist.com

WHAT holiday cheer? The latest quarterly poll of chief financial officers conducted by Duke University, Tilburg University and CFO magazine, a sister publication of The Economist, makes for grim reading. Of the 1,275 finance chiefs quizzed, those in Europe and America were more gloomy about their regional economies than ever before, with pessimists far outnumbering optimists. A third of companies in both regions, from a wide range of industries, said that they were directly affected by the recent credit-market turmoil. Optimism is relatively higher in Asia.

http://economist.com/daily/chartgallery/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10276403

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post