February 1, 2008

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For February 1, 2008

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

337 Comments »

Comment by wmbz
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 09:40:35

I am very relieved to know I am not the only human being on the planet who cannot grasp the Wisdom of Keynes (at least as practiced by his latter-day disciples).

 
 
Comment by charliebrown
2008-02-01 06:04:16

Does bailing out the Monoline insurers in any improve the insolvency of the underlying bonds. Just because you marry an ugly spouse, it doesn’t make them a pretty flower.

Comment by Hoz
2008-02-01 07:06:12

At this point in time there is no bailout of the monolines, in fact “MBIA Inc. Chief Executive Officer Gary Dunton said the world’s largest bond insurer has more than enough capital to keep its AAA credit rating and dismissed speculation the company may go bankrupt.” Leaves him open to a slew of lawsuits. It is a reckless comment.

This mornings Wall Street Journal wrote “Although MBIA has succeeded in accessing $1.5 billion of additional capital, the magnitude of projected losses underscores our view that time is of the essence in the completion of capital-raising efforts,” S&P said.

S&P is the determining factor and they have to be satisfied.

Comment by auger-inn
2008-02-01 07:20:36

S&P is the determining factor and they have to be satisfied.

How high of a hurdle is this really going to be considering they (ratings companies) have gone out of their way to keep from downgrading monolines (or anything else for that matter)?

Comment by Hoz
2008-02-01 07:47:36

Auger,

The ratings agencies are under a tremendous amount of stress. If they write down prematurely and the Monolines cannot underwrite new issues, but nobody defaults, then the agencies have done a poor job. If they fail to write down, and defaults happen, then the agencies have done a poor job.

Some analysts place the risk at $150B, some at only $22B. Citigroup stands to lose $39B if the monolines are downgraded. However Citigroup stands to lose $39B even if the monolines are not downgraded, but cannot pay off when the CDOs that Citi , Bank America and Merrill own go into default.

There is not enough moneys available to pay off counterparty defaults on these owned CDOs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jim A
2008-02-01 08:01:29

If they downgrate the monolines now because of the performance of bonds that they insured then they HAVE done a poor job. The only question is did they do a bad job then or now. The current mortgage crisis is NOT some exogenous event. It is wholely and predictably the result of the mortgages that were written during the RE bubble.

 
Comment by auger-inn
2008-02-01 08:08:56

Hoz, I understand whay you are saying, there are repercussions for downgrading. That being said, why is that the concern of the ratings company? Is not their job that of analysis of bonds? Does the bond have to “default” in order to have deserved a BBB rating? The fact of the matter appears to be that the ratings agencies are more concerned about the outcome from one of their calls then what the actual analysis tells them. Just my opinion of course.
So, they have now put themselves in a no win situation where they are damned if they do and damned if they don’t. It was never supposed to be their job to rate AAA just because those bonds are easier to for the IB’s to sell.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 09:47:25

Dunton has dropped a few gems in the MSM these past couple of days. Here are a couple more in the WSJ lead article today, with some italicized intepretation thrown in from the peanut gallery:

“I’ll be the first one to admit that we got sucker-punched (No mea culpa), but we are not alone (Rule #1 for CEO blunders: Make sure a number of your peers are currently jumping off the same cliff)…”

(Now moving into the bowels of WSJ’s Section A, where the choicest comments are found…)

“A few of our underwriting decisions from the past couple of years have tested the Richter scale,”

Is there still time to issue tsunami warnings?

 
 
 
Comment by auger-inn
2008-02-01 06:05:39

Everyone still sleeping or what?
Up here in the Conway,Jackson,Bartlett area of NH the RE market is dead. Listings are increasing but not a lot of price reductions yet. The land market is dead also but with unreal asking prices and virtually NO price reductions. I’m not sure when reality hits these sellers, perhaps they don’t have to sell so don’t care. I don’t see how ANY of these lots/acreage sell at these prices. The used home prices are almost as outrageous given the income level in this area. I guess everyone is waiting for rich New Yorkers to show up and buy their POS. It’s kind of frustrating because really, no one “gets it” here yet.

Comment by wmbz
2008-02-01 06:17:41

I guess everyone is waiting for rich New Yorkers to show up and buy their POS. It’s kind of frustrating because really, no one “gets it” here yet.

Are there enough rich New Yorkers to go around? They are supposed to be coming down here to South Carolina and buying up all of our over priced cheap property!

Comment by Central Valley Guy
2008-02-01 10:52:36

Shoot, we’re waiting for them to bail out Southern California too! I’m so glad there are there enough rich New Yorkers to prop up the entire U.S. economy.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-02-01 11:47:34

The “rich” New Yorkers seem to be everywhere except in New York.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Asparagus
2008-02-01 06:18:22

From my universe…
The skiing has been great in NH this year, a real turn around from the last few years. This season I notice the drastic turn in people’s view of the New England Ski industry. Last year, ski home owners thought their 2nd home was going to be worthless. This year…

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 09:19:25

The skiing has been great in California, as well…

I think the 20 or so ski resorts in the Golden State will be whittled down to just a few, over the next year or 2.

Out last 2 day trip to Sierra Summit cost my wife and I $400, when we added up gas, lift tickets, food and hotel room.

How many people can afford that in our present economic climate?

Comment by Seattle Renter
2008-02-01 11:52:49

You got that right buddy! Fifty dollars for a single lift ticket? You people are smoking crack….

I heard Whistler upped their prices to $85 for a lift ticket. Eighty five dollars. And now that the $CAN and $USD are pretty much on parity.

Talked to a cab driver in Vancouver in Decmeber and he said tourism was totally dead.

Gee, I wonder why?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by LookinInCali
2008-02-01 21:34:29

You forget, as long as the credit cards keep working, the people will keep spending…did someone say credit bubble?

 
 
Comment by Seattle Renter
2008-02-01 12:42:23

Uhh that was DECEMBER.

Seriously - I love whistler, but they don’t even have night skiing. So you’re looking at like MAX 8 hours or so of skiing for Eighty five bucks. Plus GST/PST.

Update: I just checked and it’s $83. Figure on another 12% on top of that in PST/GST(sales taxen). Nevermind the obscene prices of food and lodging up there.

Last time I checked, most of their business up there was from the US.

If you’re listening Whistler, you might want to consider lowering your prices to foster a little goodwill with your best customers.

It kind of takes all the fun out of skiing there when you feel like you’re being buttraped every time you turn around.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by hd74man
2008-02-01 13:20:42

RE: The skiing has been great in NH this year,

Where do you ski? When I drove by Attitash & Bretton Woods on the way to VT the right before New Year’s-traditionally the big money week-the area’s were pretty much dead.

 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-01 06:24:14


They are suffering from the same psychological problems as sellers in Tehachapi, CA. They had no problem raising prices when home prices doubled and lot prices quadrupled, but on the down side they have real problem with adjusting with the market, or supply-demand. Compared to 2005, the supply of homes is three times and demand is 1/4th.

Jas

Comment by salinasron
2008-02-01 06:53:18

I attended some water board meetings in the early 80’s where they said they wouldn’t be able to grow much because they wouldn’t have enough water; same for Bakersfield. Then in the 90’s I remember where Col. Nichols wanted to sell his water to L.A.

Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-01 07:12:04


You are right, Ron. I am on a very small local water district with wells serving some 20 households. I go to lengths to conserve water even when I pay for three times (allocation) what I use. I also conserve as much energy as I can. It is not a question of money for me but one of being responsible. Waste of water by so many in L.A. is of criminal proportions. My buddy knows someone whose water bill was $2,000. A worker in my son’s office has an electricity bill of $700. I juts don’t understand these people.

Jas

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-02-01 11:41:59

Jas:

You would be amazed at how much electricity a computer/monitor/ printer etc. uses if its on 24/7

Most people have no idea how to set the power save mode to go into standby in say 30 minutes of non-use. Just my 19″ monitor goes from 140 watts to 8 watts in standby

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 14:59:39

Our electric bill came in yesterday, @ precisely One Dollar.

(This message is brought to you by the power of the Sun)

 
 
Comment by Fred Ricks Burg, Tx
2008-02-01 11:59:17

Are these meetings where the CIA got the idea for ‘water boarding’?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Seattle Renter
2008-02-01 13:17:24

Damn - beat me to it. Glad I’m not the only one who thought that at first glance…

 
Comment by Magic Kat
2008-02-01 15:21:40

Water = the oil of the 21st Century.

 
 
 
Comment by James
2008-02-01 11:42:20

Not sure this is psychological either.

If you are underwater and try for a short sale. The bank says no to a certain price. There isn’t any point of going lower with the price. Just wait for the inevitable.

I also wonder if banks will consider renegotiating terms. Could be the banks will allow squash downs instead of repo just to stem the tide of loan failures.

Probably if you are in trouble point out to the bank what properties and REO are selling for and negotiate an in between price with out killing your credit.

Banks/MBS holders have to eat the loss BUT its possible to work out better deals.

Just wondering if this will happen

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2008-02-01 06:38:59

Yankees are stubborn, auger.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-02-01 09:08:19

Thanks for the report, Auger Inn. I’ve been wondering how your experience is up in God’s country…well at least it was that before the shopping moved in.

It sounds like Conway is the same as Portsmouth (my hometown).

“From a P-town realtor:
Sales of Portsmouth NH homes in 2007 topped those sold in 2006. The total number of homes sold in 2006 was 143 and for 2007, we sold a total of 173 homes.
Average sales prices of Portsmouth homes was down slightly in 2007 over 2006. The average sales price in 2006 was $375,035, while the average sales price in 2007 was $371,143 - not much of a difference in those numbers.
Our average days on market saw very little difference from 2006 to 2007 - 96 days in 2006 and 98 days in 2007. The average list-to-sales ratio was almost the same as well. In 2006, it was 96.0% and in 2007, it was 95.8%. ”

Go figure.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-01 09:35:36

Same problem out here in W. Colorado. Prices too high, very few reductions, everything’s just sitting. We need something to shake people into lowering their prices.

 
 
Comment by HBBLurker
2008-02-01 12:18:30

First the rich new yorkers need to move upstate only a 2 hour commute each way to the hudson valley and buy up all the 500K plus mcmansions and townhouses from lennar and toll….And then all the used homes 2…..

 
Comment by hd74man
2008-02-01 13:15:56

RE: Up here in the Conway,Jackson,Bartlett area of NH the RE market is dead.

Despite the scenery the economics of living in the North Conway region is pretty scarey unless you’re comin’ in with a big fat pension.

There are no jobs extraneous to minimum wage retail & tourism.

Heating fuel oil is now $4.00 per gallon.

Said sectors are highly dependant upon the price of gasoline which can explode with no warning today.

Access is pretty much up a goatpath (Rt.16) creating a high degree of isolation.

Outdoor recreation is fading as boomers age and GEN XYZ kids get fat and addicted to their video games. The generational attraction to the area subsequently diminishing.

Second home purchases have been largely driven by massive equity inflation of Mazzholeland property which is now in a tailspin.

With a destablized job market who wants to take a throw of dice to buy property exposed to all of the above.

It’s a new living paradigm.

 
 
Comment by crispy&cole
2008-02-01 06:07:01

XOM record profit - thanks for the tax breaks President Cheney!

Comment by Hoz
2008-02-01 06:59:43

Why Halliburton moved its corporation to the Middle East or as The VP might have said ‘if we are subpoenaed, we don’t have to turn over our records.’

Comment by watcher
2008-02-01 07:38:19

HAL is still a US corporation; only the office moved.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 07:55:10

HAL: I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Hoz
2008-02-01 08:06:13

Corporate headquarters moved. It is not a US company. It is a US listed company. It is a multi-national corporation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by watcher
2008-02-01 08:44:00

HAL is incorporated in America; “It is based in Houston, Texas, in the United States. Halliburton opened a second headquarters in Dubai, in the United Arab Emirates, in March 2007.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halliburton

They operate a subsidiary corporation in Dubai, as they do in other countries.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 08:44:31

HAL: I know I’ve made some very poor decisions recently, but I can give you my complete assurance that my work will be back to normal. I’ve still got the greatest enthusiasm and confidence in the mission. And I want to help you.

 
Comment by Hoz
2008-02-01 12:42:42

Corporate offices have moved from the US. Corporate offices are in Dubai. There is not yet a test lawsuit, but there will be one and then we will see if it is an American company.

The Wikipedia site has numerous factual errors and needs to be updated.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 14:43:32

Interviewer: HAL, you have an enormous responsibility on this mission, in many ways perhaps the greatest responsibility of any single mission element. You’re the brain, and central nervous system of the ship, and your responsibilities include watching over the men in hibernation. Does this ever cause you any lack of confidence?

HAL: Let me put it this way, Mr. Amor. The 9000 series is the most reliable computer ever made. No 9000 computer has ever made a mistake or distorted information. We are all, by any practical definition of the words, foolproof and incapable of error.

 
Comment by vozworth
2008-02-01 19:49:04

witness the limit of communication.

TECH TOP IS IN.

microsoft trying to garner 16% of the tragic says,
“this is so.”

now, HAL being a contractor of oil services, says oil is still so…. that means intolerant. no supply side help.pay as you go.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Hoz
2008-02-01 06:10:05

For a relatively fair piece on Senator H. Clinton

A most interesting read from Semi-Daily Journal
The Semi-Daily Journal of Economist Brad DeLong
June 2003

“…My two cents’ worth–and I think it is the two cents’ worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994–is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn’t smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly….”

http://tinyurl.com/ds0v

I am biased and would rip her a new one, but Professor DeLong gives an accurate appraisal.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-01 06:43:15

Facts is facts. In 2002 she voted for an event that I rather wish had never happened. Her vote was politically expedient as voting “no” would have doomed her future higher aspirations. The time for criticizing the current decider was 2002 - not 2006, 2007, 2008 - after it has become a safe and nationally accepted pasttime. Opportunist - plain and simple.

Comment by BubbleViewer
2008-02-01 06:55:49

People might want to do a google search on the following terms together: Clintons Mena, Arkansas drugs.
Or they might want to look for a conveniently located sandbox to insert their head.

Comment by spike66
2008-02-01 08:13:44

I do think that Bill Clinton and his financial wheeling is going to bite them. He just took a 20 million dollar payout from dealings in Dubai with pal Ron Burkle, and now his pal from Canada and he set up 3 uranium mining deals with the dictator from Kazachstan, worth tens of millions. Said dictator is a barbarian. Hillary is refusing to release the “donors” list to the Clinton library…said to be heavy with Saudi and Chinese names. It ain’t just her non-existent skill set, it’s whose money is running these people.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by peter m
2008-02-01 10:01:17

“Hillary is refusing to release the “donors” list to the Clinton library…said to be heavy with Saudi and Chinese names. It ain’t just her non-existent skill set, it’s whose money is running these people.”

There was a great deal of questionable donations and campaine contributions made to the Clinton war chest during his presidency. I used to have a enormous amt of listed illegalities i had saved on my old CPU till i switched computers and the data dissappeared but the gamut ran from loreal to lincoln bedroom to whitewater to the FBI files Hillary purloined . I actually think to this day that the Clinton presidency was the most corrupted in US history, equalling the Harding and Grant presidencies for sheer corruption and selling of favors.

All this stuff is no doubt kept under presidentail seal and is unavailable to the public, and the ugly truths may never see the limelight. I followed the shennanigans of the Clintonistas for eight years and believe me Monica was just small potatoes and a useful diversion from the real blantant corruption of the Clinton era, where everything and anything was for sale from national security data to white house dinners.

The Chinese and Saudi’s will no doubt be rooting for billary.

 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-02-01 10:25:29

I actually think to this day that the Clinton presidency was the most corrupted in US history, equalling the Harding and Grant presidencies for sheer corruption and selling of favors.

Laugh.

While I am no Clinton apologist, no administration in our 200+ year history comes even close to the corruption and mendacity displayed by Bush, Cheney and their minions.

Tricky Dick Nixon and Warren G. Harding, the previous recordholders in the Modern Presidential Criminal Sweepstakes, look like rank amateurs compared to the current administration.

 
Comment by Central Valley Guy
2008-02-01 11:12:29

Geez Peter, welcome to 2008. Where have you been the past 7 years?

 
Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-01 12:31:41

And what has been happening this past 7 years..Peter peter its time to wake up..this admin is taking away all your constitutional liberties.
What Other ever held hands with the Saudis?

I actually think to this day that the Clinton presidency was the most corrupted in US history, equalling the Harding and Grant presidencies for sheer corruption and selling of favors.

 
Comment by Magic Kat
2008-02-01 15:28:14

Crystal ball says Hillary Clinton will be our next president with Obama as running mate. After 8 years, Obama will be next president, the “new” JFK. Clinton will run against McCain and Rom, a tight race, but will lose biggest states.

 
Comment by MEaston
2008-02-01 16:28:13

Spike all the recent presidential libraries (reagan,bush,clinton) got big gifts from the Saudi’s ect. Our gov is for sale you know

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/14/AR2007121402124_pf.html
Washington post says donations from Saudi’s to Bush1 =Clinton.

I remember Reagan breaking all kinds of records for speaking fee’s after he left office.

Even more ominous is gov officials who become lobbiests or go to work for firms like the Carlyle group which make money by having insider information and manipulating gov.

 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2008-02-01 06:56:21

“Opportunist - plain and simple.”

Exactly, edgewater. I had the feeling she was watching like a hawk what Bush was doing and wondering how she could get in on a little of that action. I’m equally depressed at the prospect of either Clinton or McCain as prez. And very pissed that they are “pre-determined” candidates. It’s already pretty obvious that Rudy would be named as Veep for McCain.

Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-02-01 08:35:13

I don’t think McCain will tap Guiliani for VP, despite Rudy’s endorsement — a move that was both smart politically and a face-saving opportunity for the former mayor.

Bottom line, Rudy’s a drag on the GOP ticket. The more people see him, the less they like him. The smart more for McCain is to pick someone with conservative bona fides and a little bit of charisma.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-02-01 08:56:57

Should be “The smart move for McCain …”

 
Comment by BigWig
2008-02-01 09:42:31

Should read Rudy’s a dragQUEEN on the GOP ticket.

 
Comment by hd74man
2008-02-01 13:30:14

RE: Rudy’s a drag on the GOP ticket. The more people see him, the less they like him.

Yeah, that story about him usin’ his security detail to walk his Long Island mistress’s dog and then using obscure city accounts to bury the expenditures totally torpedoed his boat. Whatta loser.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 15:03:42

What amazed me about Rudy was, he had glaring liabilities that weren’t exactly well hidden, and still tried to make a run for the highest office in the land, despite all of it.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-01 06:55:12


I decided in 2001 that I would not vote for the President anymore (I voted and contributed to W, so that tells you how stupid I could be at times). However, if I were to vote I would take every opportunity to vote against Hillary and McCain. Both are fully owned by Bankrupters and Fraudsters of NYC. McCain said that he will appoint a commission to deal with the economic problems and would put Greenspan and Kudlow on that commission. You get the idea. Hillary is beyond disgusting. If we do have a Hillary-McCain race, the Bush-Gore would look good in terms of choice of lesser of two evils. What a system!

Always trying to lessen my stupidity and ignorance (a battle that must be fought daily),

Jas

Comment by kckid
2008-02-01 07:09:39

John Sidney McCain III entered the United States Naval Academy at Annapolis, Maryland in 1954. Young McCain wanted to become an admiral. He planned to be the “first son and grandson of four star admirals” to achieve such a distinction. But that was not to be. McCain III possessed none of the innate character and discipline traits that helped mold his father and grandfather into great military leaders.

While a pilot trainee, McCain continued to party hard. He drove a Corvette and dated an exotic dancer named “Marie the Flame of Florida.” Timberg wrote that McCain “learned to fly at Pensacola, though his performance was below par, at best good enough to get by. He liked flying, but didn’t love it.”

McCain Lost Five Military Aircraft

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message495961/pg1

Comment by auger-inn
2008-02-01 07:34:59

While a pilot trainee, McCain continued to party hard. He drove a Corvette and dated an exotic dancer named “Marie the Flame of Florida.”

As a former Naval Aviator, I can assure you this is standard ops, particularly for that timeframe. Hell, happyhour was a mandatory formation for officers (particularly if you had aspirations of advancement) as were strippers at happyhour. The strippers were runout of officer clubs around 1980 or 81, around the time women were graduating military academies as officers (1974 or 75 was when they were initally accepted in the academies). At any rate, this was the norm before all the political correctness took hold, and may I add that it was pretty big fun while it lasted! :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2008-02-01 12:56:14

Thanks for your perspective, auger. Until blogs came along, information like yours never saw the light of day.

 
Comment by Gulfstream-sitter
2008-02-01 13:29:42

It’s still “standard ops” in some places I know………:)

At the place I used to work, there was the “Christmas Party” that you took the wife to. Then there was the (by verbal invitation only) “Year-End Party”, which was the REAL party.

Nothing is funnier than getting 50-75 half-lit aviation types together in one bar. Laughed so hard and long one night, my ribs were sore the next day.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2008-02-01 07:37:14

McCain supposedly won Florida. What a complete, asinine joke. McWho? I don’t know a soul here who even remotely considered him. As I said in a post a few days ago, when I went to the polls, there were lots of Romney and Paul signs, and some Rudy signs. I think McCain was promised the 2008 Repub nomination if he caved in to Bush back in 2000, which he dutifully did. Why should that surprise anyone? It was common knowledge here in FLA that Rove and Bush pressured Mel Martinez to run for Senate when in fact Martinez didn’t want to and had dreams of becoming Florida gov. The Rove/Bush machine ramped up and put Martinez in office by whatever means.

Oh, and Paul only took 3% in Florida? BS. He had a LOT of support here. I’m not saying he would have beaten Romney, because I did know a lot of people who supported Romney, but he sure should have beaten Huckabee.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-01 07:56:11

If votes were weighted by enthusiasm the race would certainly be Barack vs. Ron. Those who vote for the “ordained” candidates are the types that don’t want to be bothered with thinking too hard and cling to idealized visions of a very dubious past.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 09:44:14

I think there’s more than a little chemistry between Barack & Ron.

As much as I like Ron, he’s going nowhere, fast.

Obama needs a mentor in matters economic, and they’d be a great fit together, and provide much needed unity politically, as an added bonus.

Obama/Paul ‘08

 
Comment by Wheatie
2008-02-01 12:58:11

In 2000, I was involved with the Libertarian party and its Ohio candidates. Amazingly, the candidates that stumped hard and the candidates that did nothing but sit on the ballot had a small margin of vote difference in the election. I am talking every Libertarian got between 2% and 4% of the votes in Ohio from school board candidates to Senatorial races. So, Ron Paul getting lots of enthusiasm and little vote does not surprise me for an underdog candidate.

 
 
 
Comment by Blano
2008-02-01 07:19:32

If it’s Hillary-McCain, I probably won’t vote, for the first time.

Comment by palmetto
2008-02-01 07:47:38

I’m gonna vote for Paul if I have to write him in. I don’t care. I can at least vote my conscience.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blano
2008-02-01 08:36:43

I thought about doing that, or voting for myself.

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-01 15:56:34

Blano, if you vote for yourself, I’m going to vote for you, too.

 
 
Comment by samk
2008-02-01 08:59:37

I understand your frustration, but I won’t be able to just forego voting. Even if my vote is a throwaway it’s still going to be cast.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 07:24:38

Those are very devastating comments coming from a Clinton-era insider. I commented independently here within recent months on her health care reform flop (but I hear she bakes a very mean cookie).

 
Comment by flatffplan
2008-02-01 07:28:03

has free-er healthcare worked in any of the 20+ countries that offer it ?
nope
pure hubris to think we will do better

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-01 08:01:46

I look forward to doing my own dental work like the Brits. At a hobby show last year I stocked up a bunch of steel picks and tiny drill bits. Suprisingly model building and denistry both require a steady hand and use somewhat compatible instruments.

Comment by solvingadream
2008-02-01 09:54:59

I’m waiting for the do-it-yourself root canal kits…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 10:52:40

Oh, Behave!

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-01 15:58:04

There’s a famous doc in W. Colorado who took out his own appendix.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 16:09:21

do-it-to-yourself-appendecotomy?

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-01 16:41:55

Yeah, for real, and he survived, old-time cowboy type. He was my dad’s doctor’s dad (not quite a palindrome).

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 17:05:27

A man, a plan, a canal, Panama.

 
 
Comment by tresho
2008-02-01 12:50:47

When a tooth gets rotten & painful enough, it loosens in the socket. When it hurts enough, a pair of Vise Grips or even a hunting knife will do to remove what ails ya. Why do you think dentists used to hang a replica of an extracted tooth outside their offices?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Incredulous
2008-02-01 09:21:09

It works great in France, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Australia, Spain; not so well in the UK (depending on location); well in some Canadian provinces, not in others (each province has its own unique plan). It depends on the program. Universal Health Care can be done, but not as long as special interests meddle. The biggest obstacles are greedy physicians (who don’t want to see their incomes go down), greedy corporate hospitals (that charge ten dollars for a band-aid and a thousand dollars or more a day for a filthy, semi-private room), greedy insurance companies (that are making record profits, despite inflated health-care costs), greedy personal injury lawyers (whose settlements reflect the alleged future ubercosts of medical care for clients), and, of course, greedy drug companies ripping off everone with their taxpayer-subsidized research offspring (medicines). We used to have a subscription hospital in Tampa, where one paid a modest flat fee every month or year, and ones entire family was covered for everything. People loved it. But, when corporations took over, all reason flew out the window.

Comment by janna
2008-02-01 11:18:50

And greedy consumers that think, hey, I might as well get an MRI for a headache, because my copay on it is $50.00. Everyone wants a Lexus plan (that someone else pays for). Must never, ever, be told no, that treatment is not cost-effective, no, it is not worth $800k to keep you alive 6 more weeks, no, you have to wait a couple of months for something…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Incredulous
2008-02-01 11:42:38

I thought co-payments were supposed to discourage this. But, if medical costs were actually based on reality, an MRI wouldn’t cost much (once the overpriced machine is paid for, it’s mostly profit from that point forward), and what now costs 800K for six more weeks of living would probably cost less than 1% of that. Turning medicine into an ubergoldmine for providers was a mistake.

 
Comment by Robert-in-Florida
2008-02-01 12:41:01

I work in the health care field so here would be my take on diagnostic testing: This problem IMO is two fold, the first being that there is such a CYA mentality out there, due to litigation, that doctors are ordering these tests to avoid the lawsuits from not looking deep enough. Yes, looking deeper is a boon to finding the obscure and seldom encountered but the application to garden variety problems is a gross misallocation of resources. I remember when the first MRI’s were being put into hospitals and they did NOT use them to see that your ACL was torn as they could and can diagnosis this without the MRI. The second is that the doctors you see today do not posess a 10th of the diagnostic skills that the old doc’s do/did. Simply due to the fact that there was no way to look into the body without actually opening it up. They had to be expert at knowing where to look and how to put together the clues. In this age of medicine they are slowly but surely being relegated to the status of a tech. May I also add that the complete lack of personal responsability is the number one factor in the cost of health care. Don’t beleive me? Look at the rates for diabeties and heart disease/cardiovascular disease and the risk factors. The number 1 risk factor in both of these is being fat with the second being lazy. So…eat less, exercise more and these problems diminish as well as the cost of care.
Just one opinion among many and please forgive me for the off topic nature of this post.

 
 
 
Comment by MEaston
2008-02-01 16:20:37

You might want to read a bit before you post

US ranks #37 in health care systems out of 40 top industrialized nations, but we are #1 in spending.

There is a lot of BS propaganda out there regarding a nationalized health care system. The plan promoted a heavily regulated HMO system. The people who fought against it were the insurance companies and the drug companies. ie the ones with the most to loose. I’m sure it would have tried to manage costs more aggressively as Medicare does. They make a declaration about what they will pay for and hospitals and doctors are stuck with it. There is no free market in medicine. The system now is extrememly inefficient and costly. There is no such thing as a free market when the consumer doesn’t understand the product (insurance or medicine).

People will rant that they don’t want to pay for others insurance with their taxes. Guess what, you pay for their healthcare via taxes and the increased rates hospitals charge to make up for all of the non paying customers. Your bill is much higher because the these people get no prevention care, wait until disease is advanced, and go through the emergency room.

Comment by Incredulous
2008-02-01 17:06:40

I agree with you, but the ranking is bogus. When the UN or World Health Organizations rate the medical care of different nations, they include such factors as affordability and reported hospital infant mortality. Most countries do not make much effort to save very premature newborns, and in such cases, when they die, do not report them as hospital infant fatalities. Here, we do make the effort to save almost every newborn, however premature. Thus our hospital infant mortality statistics look much worse than those of most industrialized countries, but, in reality, our hospital infant survival rates are much, much higher.

Here in the U.S., if a pregnant woman is killed in a car crash, her death is listed as a “maternal mortality,” skewing the numbers. In most countries, it would only be listed as an accident-related fatality.

When all countries are judged by exactly the same objective standards, omitting affordability, America’s medical care ranks at the very top of the list, despite our filthy hospitals. But, Americans with serious health problems who do not have a lot of money, good insurance, or government assistance might as well be living in Haiti.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by measton
2008-02-01 22:20:06

http://www.nasdaq.com/aspxcontent/NewsStory.aspx?cpath=20080108%5cACQDJON200801081401DOWJONESDJONLINE000571.htm&

I don’t think this study looked at infant mortality, US ranked dead last.

 
 
 
 
Comment by SD_suntaxed
2008-02-01 09:33:41

As for that health care reform, she didn’t even bother with having a doctor on her committee back when she was trying to put together HillaryCare 1.0. I’ve heard indirectly that the committee had already made up their minds on what they were going to do and actual input from doctors was merely formality.

Comment by Incredulous
2008-02-01 10:11:36

I’ve read worse than that. The whole thing was rigged to promote HMOS in which she had financial interests. The hearings were secret. No consideration of single-payer plan was permitted. Insurance company lobbyists paid tens of thousand of dollars each for access. Her whacked-out friend who concocted her plan apparently created one so incredibly convoluted, even Universal Health Care advocates said it was ridiculous. Ralph Nader said it was a joke and a fraud.

I’ve always advocated Universal Health Care, which could be far less expensive than what we have now, even if only insurance profits were eliminated. But, given how this government works, I suspect it could easily be turned into another government make-work program for the chronically incompetent unable to find employment in the private sector. I think a single-payer plan is the simplest, but there a lot of successful plans to look at and learn from. Re-inventing the wheel isn’t necessary.

Comment by James
2008-02-01 11:55:37

Eliminating incentives and profits is always a big plus for productivity. And a big government setup to determine doctor pay scales will be a disaster.

Incentives can be dangerous too.

If you did something like pay doctors by the number of sucessful treatments; then it will be very difficult for doctors to take on challenging cases.

So it would be blanket rates for government employees.

Anyhow, another reward for people not working is a bad policy unless you are going to further tinker with welfare/unemployment. People might not seek further education if the are getting a free lunch on housing/health care/food stamps exc.

Other exciting aspects would be setting up standard treatments… could be ugly.

Right now if you pull up in a hospital or trauma care center I don’t think they search your body for a insurance card.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Incredulous
2008-02-01 15:34:29

So you have to go to a hospital or trauma center to get (mimimal, emergency) care if you don’t have insurance? Where’s the economic logic in that?

If universal care DOES work in many, many countries, there’s no reason to assume it cannot work here. There will always be idiots who misuse it, just as they misuse their insurance and HMOs.

If one visits an emergency room, it instantly becomes obvious that tons of uninsured people in this country are getting outrageously expensive (albeit mimimal, emergency) medical care at taxpayers’ expense. I would rather these people go to doctors’ offices than emergency rooms’ for minor problems, but the doctors’ offices would turn them away.

A sweet friend of mine (21 years old) just died because she could not afford a heart/lung transplant (pulmonary hypertension). Such problems don’t exist for rich Arabs jetting in and buying organs for themselves whether they have insurance or not. When the best care goes to those with tons of money, however undeserved, while really good people are needlessly allowed to die, something is seriously amiss.

 
Comment by Incredulous
2008-02-01 17:14:43

Incidentally, is megamoney the only incentive for doctors to do anything? Shouldn’t HELPING people and SAVING LIVES be incentives?

 
Comment by SpacecoastFLrenter
2008-02-01 17:33:26

want cheap immediate care—go to an outpatient urgent care office. Hospital ERs are for suckers.

Dont have insurance–work out a deal with you doc for cash pay, he will be happy to not deal with insurance company.

United, aetna BCBS are all very profitable biz. Look at the stock for United healthcare over the last 10 years…if only I had bought….

U want luss utilization of medical resources by docs, let them ration care….cuz there is not enough for all to have everything and somebody has to do it eventually. But that will never happen under the status quo. Legal system and hardcore liberals won’t allow it. In europe the doc decides if your grandma/wife/child gets taken off the ventilator etc…..they ration care…docs have immunity. I always ask those who want less spending who in their family should we sacrifice when the time comes.

yes healthcare is expensive, but what will it cost you when it is free?

 
Comment by CA renter
2008-02-02 05:15:22

I think it would be beneficial to have a basic level of care that is provided by the government. If people want something more than that, they should be able to buy insurance or pay out-of-pocket for high-level care.

Also, I’d offer govt grants for drug research (including incentives) and let the govt develop drugs — maybe they’d actually find cures instead of “treatments”.

Currently, if they found the “cure” for cancer, but the ingredients could not be patented, you’d not likely see that cure in the marketplace. Too much money being made by the big pharma companies to allow a cure for cancer.

Call me cynical…

 
 
 
Comment by sm_landlord
2008-02-01 10:24:43

You know, it’s safe to assume that doctors have given this a lot of thought. They should at least have a seat at the table during the discussion. I doubt that will happen, however, now that medicine in this country is completely corporatized and doctors have been marginalized.

Comment by tresho
2008-02-01 13:06:45

Unfortunately, not even doctors who have given this a lot of thought grasp the issues. Health insurance or socialized care, whatever you call it, still revolves around large numbers of people who don’t need [or at least use] healthcare paying for small numbers of people who get the care. Healthcare is always rationed, one way or the other. I ration mine by my own ability to pay for it. When patients don’t have to pay out of their own pockets, their demand for care suddenly booms, surprise, surprise. If caregivers are guaranteed their fees for whatever services they chose to provide, the bills they generate will skyrocket. This dilemma is the equivalent of “moral hazard” in economics.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SpacecoastFLrenter
2008-02-01 17:41:08

People without healthcare present with later stage disease and as a result have higher mortality. You may become one of them for exactly the reason you addressed. Not my opinion but fact.
Most doctors are overworked and would rather do less than more. Some are greedy but there are better ways to make money without 10-15 years of school to pay (and no income)

 
 
 
 
Comment by david cee
2008-02-01 12:21:48

Thanks for all the Hillary bashing from all those HBBers that voted for Bush. Your judgement sure panned out for the last 8 years, and now you want me to use your logic for 2008. Wrong then, wrong now.

Comment by Incredulous
2008-02-01 15:17:44

You’re leaping to conclusions. I didn’t vote for Bush, I voted for Nader (twice). And, no, it didn’t hurt Gore, because I would never have voted for him. I wouldn’t have bothered voting at all had Nader not been on the ticket.

Given the current apparent choices, I may skip voting this time around.

Hillary bashing isn’t limited to Bush fans. My two closest Democrat friends are far more critical of her than I.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 15:29:02

Painting with a broad brush statement is stereotyping, always dangerous.

The only person on here that has admitted voting for ’ssshrubery, (and giving money to his campaign, yee gads!) is Jas.

 
 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-01 06:18:22


YAHOO!

Sometimes, it is better to be lucky than good. As you know, I am a big time bear, but I do hedge some of my shorts. The way I hedged part of my GOOG and MSFT shorts was to be long YHOO. Looks like this combo is going to be great today.

Now comes the lucky part. I almost took loss in my biggest YHOO long position (short naked Jan’10 25 puts, WYHME) yesterday and the order didn’t go thru as my price was not hit. My other long position, YHQDF — YHOO APR-08 $30 CALL, was almost worthless, but now it worth more than what I paid.

Lucky January might be followed by lucky February.

Jas

Comment by packman
2008-02-01 06:43:35

Congrats.

I’m short GOOG as well so that’ll be nice, though in general looks like another running of the bulls today, due to Yahoo. One thing I’ve never figured out is - why are major companies’ purchases considered a good thing for the market? Seems like it should be the opposite:

- Even though the company being bought’s stock goes up a lot, justifiably, the company buying them’s stock should go down the same amount.

- Consildation is a sign the given industry is weakening - companies are not strong enough to stand on their own

- Inefficiency is created both in the logistics of merging the companies, and long term via the mixed cultures.

Comment by Paul in Jax
2008-02-01 06:59:18

Although I don’t necessarily agree with your analysis, if you compare market caps of YHOO and MSFT and check the pre-market trading you will see there is the almost exact offsetting price match you theorize.

 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-01 07:01:55


I am selling more naked Jan’10 900 calls on GOOG if I can get a good price. It is going to be an exciting day. Swiss franc at all-time high; Gold at all-time high; and USTs doing great. What more can a bear like me ask?

Jas

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 07:29:24

Jas — why are you trying to scare people? Didn’t you see this MarketWatch story yesterday? It sounds like it should be a fairly calm day in the stock market today.

Don’t worry… be happy.

ECONOMIC OUTLOOK
No ’smoking gun’ of recession expected in key data
By Greg Robb, MarketWatch
Last update: 5:04 p.m. EST Jan. 31, 2008

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Two of the most important monthly indicators of the economy’s health to be released Friday are expected to show the economy is weak but neither is expected to provide the “smoking gun” that proves the economy is in recession, economists said.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/no-smoking-gun-expected-fridays/story.aspx?guid=%7B845F07E8%2D0FA7%2D4F93%2D9D46%2DDB73E59EAFB7%7D&dist=sp_inthis

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-01 08:52:30


LUUV, the volatility, Prof. That is the life-blood for a speculator like me and I am sure for Chick. This will last into 2010 if my scenario pans out.

Jas

 
 
 
Comment by DeepInTheHeartOf
2008-02-01 08:50:06

Having seen an MSFT acquisition from the inside, I’m just shaking my head.

It seems that Microsoft is throwing in the towel on their own efforts with MSN / Hotmail on which they have already spent $billions and are attempting to buy their way to a better position by acquiring a company that has its own troubles.

Should this deal happen, the existing Hotmail/MSN orgs at MSFT will fight to keep themselves relevant. The integration of the two companies will be more difficult than expected, and key yahoo people will stick around just long enough to vest and cash-in, while a lot of the people who do the real work will find themselves at odds with MSFT’s Darwinian corporate environment and move on in time.

That is to say, I expect it to be fought with problems and the combined result to be less than the sum of the individuals.

Comment by sm_landlord
2008-02-01 10:40:10

It’s about time MSFT threw in the towel on MSN and Hotmail.

And you’re right about the organization issues, there is a high likelihood of the result becoming less than the sum of the parts.

But MSFT doesn’t have much choice. What I hear from the inside of MSFT is that they will never write another operating system, because all of the important talent is gone, replaced with intractable bureaucracy. The Office family for some time has been so bloated that the products are unmaintainable and the quality is going down hill. They still have a lot of inertia, but their time has passed. Sooner or later, someone is going to do unto MSFT what MSFT did unto IBM. All they can do now is try to delay the inevitable.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Seattle Renter
2008-02-01 15:03:59

Wow! Praise Linus, no more crap OSes from MS would be a true blessing.

I really liked MS back in the late 80’s, but it soon became apparent that profit motive completely snuffed out any semblance of concern for their fellow man, being actully productive and benficial to society as an organization, or even concern for their customers beyond how much money can they worm out of them.

As a fairly seasoned IT professional, it simply became an insult to my intelligence. And considering that I only consider myself of average to slightly above average intelligence, it takes a lot to insult it.

So I started playing with Linux back around ‘95 ro ‘96 and pretty much switched to it completely around 2000.

I still keep an XP install around, but pretty much only for certain games.

Thanks for the great info sm_landlord!

 
 
 
 
Comment by svcodemonkey
2008-02-01 17:22:49

Jas,

What other stocks you are holding/shorting? I like to follow some winners out there in this blog.

Thanks

 
 
Comment by cactus
2008-02-01 06:22:58

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=aaHp2MaAZBUc&refer=home

California’s unemployment rate, at 6.1 percent, has risen 1.3 percentage points from a year ago.

“The economy’s a major issue here,” said Allan Hoffenblum, former political director of the state Republican Party who owns a political-consulting firm in Los Angeles. “It’s housing and fear of a recession.”

Zandi said California and neighboring Arizona, which also votes Feb. 5, are already in a recession.

Comment by REhobbyist
2008-02-01 06:42:05

Sickening. Employment numbers stink, but that pleases the bulls because they’re now sure to get another Fed cut. Dow futures up!

Comment by jim A
2008-02-01 08:07:19

Just more proof that Wall Street is “broken.” Overall asset prices are determind not by profitibility or possible returns on investment in plant. Instead they’re based primarily upon the cost of the money that is used to buy them, and the chance that will fuel further appreciation. Sound familiar? Around here it should.

 
Comment by Al
2008-02-01 08:51:42

If the employment numbers were good, the bulls would be pleased too. All news is good news. Does anyone know the history of bulls and bears? Does the bull come from - bull$hit? Bears from - I can’t bear the bull$hit?

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2008-02-01 12:09:27

So far you got my vote for favorite quip of the day :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Earl 288
2008-02-01 19:29:18

Al, That`s really funny!!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-01 06:46:02


This usually means that the economy has been in recession for 4-8 months. When UR goes up 0.5-0.7% from the cycle low the economy is already in a recession.

Jas

Comment by Hoz
2008-02-01 07:12:04

and deflation is sure to follow. LOL

Come on Jas, the selloff in the dollar is indicative that the world does not believe we are in a recession. And at this point in time, I have not enough information to show anything other than a slowdown.

Yesterday’s new claims are the first horrible piece of data in 6 months. Is it an aberration or a steady trend? One set of data points do not a graph make.

Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-01 07:33:06


Patience, Hoz, patience! Deflation would be demand driven. Just let the stimulus pass by and what next? Our economy manipulators will run out of tricks to boost demand artificially.

Jas

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Hoz
2008-02-01 08:00:38

Jas

I think you should reread the effects of $8T in demand notes in a reduced commodity environment.

Or as long as the US does not raise interest rates, inflation is here to stay. Do you think the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates in a slowing economy?

The only deflationary times in history, Japan and the great depression occurred because of rising interest rates.

 
Comment by jim A
2008-02-01 08:11:09

I would argue that currently money is disappearing through RE price declines and defaults by borrowers more quickly than it is being pumped in by the Fed.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 08:20:03

Jas — I am still waiting for “The Great Depression of 1990″ myself. Is it going to hit any day soon?

 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-01 09:09:18


“The only deflationary times in history, Japan and the great depression occurred because of rising interest rates.”

Thanks, but no thanks, for very bad (wrong) history lesson. I see why there are so many disagreements among Americans as well as around the world. Everyone has his, or her, view of the world that has little relationship to reality, especially, historical lessons that can be drawn.

I could be wrong but not because of wrong, or distorted, view of history.

Jas

 
Comment by Hoz
2008-02-01 11:45:47

Then you better get a new history book. Whatever story you are reading is giving you incorrect information.

From the Federal Reserve
“The experience of the U.S. economy during the mid-1930s, when short-term nominal interest rates were continuously close to zero, is sometimes taken as evidence that monetary
policy was ine ective and the economy was in a \liquidity trap.”

Close examination of the historical policy record for the period indicates that the evidence does not support such
assertions. The incomplete and erratic recovery from the Great Depression can be traced to a failure to pursue consistently expansionary policy resulting from an incorrect understanding of monetary policy in an environment of very low short-term nominal interest rates.

Commonalities with the Japanese experience during the late 1990s, and the inadequacy of short-term interest rates as indicators of the stance of monetary policy are discussed
and a robust operating procedure for implementing monetary policy in a low interest rate environment by adjusting the maturity of targeted interest rate instruments is described.”
Monetary Policy in Deflation: The Liquidity Trap
in History and Practice
Athanasios Orphanides
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
December 2003

There are plenty of other supporting documents from the Federal Reserve, The Bank of Japan, Riksbank among others. Do your research.

 
Comment by Seattle Renter
2008-02-01 15:30:55

Trusting the Fed and other central banks when they talk about money and the economy is like trusting pharmaceutical companies when they talk about restless leg syndrome.

Consider the source.

 
Comment by Hoz
2008-02-01 16:00:47

The facts are the Federal Reserve RAISED rates in the depression and The Bank of Japan RAISED rates in the 90’s.

Fighting the fed is a money losing proposition. The fed is going into lowering the rates faster than you can sell dollars mode.

 
 
Comment by New in NM
2008-02-01 07:45:59

The WSJ has a quote this morning that Jerome Kerviel saved the US from recession.

We’ve spent the morning in our house imitating french people patting themselves on the backs for unintentionally paying back the US for WWII.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-02-01 11:36:46

We are all $inner$ and we have been $aved by a Frenchman.

Thank heavens it’s all over. It’s all behind us.

 
 
 
 
Comment by krazy bill
2008-02-01 07:12:38

Arizona is in bad shape, sales tax revenue down 3.4% Dec. ‘07 compared to Dec. ‘06.
Factor in inflation and that Arizona is one of the fastest growing states and that number is astounding.

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0201B1-update0201.html

Comment by WT Economist
2008-02-01 09:20:40

Holy smokes. That is astounding.

 
 
 
Comment by NotInMontana
2008-02-01 06:25:34

It’s dead here, too, but “it’s winter” and all that. Yet there are open houses every Sunday - I don’t remember them doing that before. Especially at the hideous condos. I wish I could remember better what they used to do, and I wish we move into the future faster to see what happens this year.

 
Comment by pete abbott
2008-02-01 06:26:06

I am greatful to all on this blog. The knowledge gained here saved me and my wife hundreds of thousands and set me on a new carrier path(nursing from telecom tech). Think you guys, and BEN JONES for this sight.

Comment by flatffplan
2008-02-01 07:12:52

you can write Ben in in Nov

Comment by dennisd
2008-02-01 07:30:28

“you can write Ben in in Nov”

Ben is probably over-qualified for Prez.

 
 
Comment by Fiver
2008-02-01 08:02:23

I’ll second that, pete. My education all started here on this blog back in 2005. I was trying to figure out why, since I was making the median US income, there were no houses priced at the traditional measure of three times my income. I mean no houses. Even the condos down the block started at $300,000. And so I started doing research. Thanks again to Ben, and to Rich Toscano at the San Diego Real Estate Chrono-Collapsometer, for saving me from being one more F’d Buyers. I owe you all a debt that cannot be repaid.

 
 
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-02-01 06:28:00

a very comforting thought as we trudge thru this recession and tight credit market is that many americans are ready for this with their ramped up savings. all americans save right?

i was reading the weekend suggestion thread and just realized that my company has not said a peep about our annual performance reviews and possible salary increase.

thank god i was not counting on one this year

also saw this article from toronto paper it is ffrom awhile back but it is priceless - enjoy

http://www.torontolife.com/features/going-broke/?pageno=1

Comment by ghostwriter
2008-02-01 07:29:51

That article was great. These people are the same so called “victims” that we’ve been discussing here. Who would ever feel sorry for them if they lost everything? Talk about status symbols and keeping up with the Joneses.

 
Comment by Blano
2008-02-01 07:35:52

Great article, yeah, and made me cringe at the same time.

 
Comment by Frank Hague
2008-02-01 07:54:38

A Great and absolutely painful article. I have a friend who works in admissions at a prep school that charges tuition of about $40k a year. He gets these types of families applying for financial aid all the time. They have two homes, a Mercedes, a Range Rover and absolutely no cash.

I have never understood why these status symbols are so important. I would think being able to sleep well at night and having financial security would trump the 2nd home and the Mercedes, but obviously that is not how many think.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 09:01:35

“Loan Rangers”

 
Comment by auger-inn
2008-02-01 10:26:32

Perhaps he ought to also question the idea of a 40K tuition as well? That’s friggin ridiculous!

Comment by Frank Hague
2008-02-01 11:14:24

Agreed. However, for most of the people who send their kids to this school the $40k is pocket change. The majority of their students are old money and aren’t concerned with a measly $40k. This is a prep school in Massachusetts, from what my friend tells me this price is about average for those kind of schools. Generally their students are either on full scholarships (they come truly poor or lower middle class families) or they come from families in the top 1%.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Not_In_Montana
2008-02-01 10:28:54

“They had a $2,000 Visa balance when they decided to supplement their incomes with Amway. The scheme didn’t work out, and they racked up another $5,000 on their credit card.”

LOL. Morons.

Comment by auger-inn
2008-02-01 11:18:22

Yeah, but they got enough cleaning supplies to last them through the next thirty years or so!

Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-01 12:51:42

I just now-LOL- ran out of some stuff I bought in 94. LOL
Not alot of it, but didn’t use that much

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 11:13:08

I’ve always lived comfortably well bellow my means, for if you are looking for meaning in life, the best things generally cost nothing.

 
 
Comment by bizarroworld
2008-02-01 06:28:49

For those who enjoy a good Cramer bashing:
http://market-ticker.denninger.net/

The worst example of all last night was Cramer - we had a raw Bull Stampede that aborted instantly as soon as a bit of “reality” came into the picture. Yet Cramer’s interpretation? “Buy buy buy buy buy” because “The Fed has our back.”

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-01 06:34:41

Hopefully his adherents will do their duty, step up to the plate, and throw away their money so our economy won’t seize up entirely. In that regard his little show is actually a well functioning mechanism - in a Darwinian kinda way.

 
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-02-01 06:36:31

saw that jacka@@ last night for a minute

he said buy retail specifically jcp and ralph lauren and buy homebuilders. and the bansk as well to boot

he is dangerous to the average j6p
why is there never a caller who says you said to buy xyz @ 20 and it is at 8? screaming at this moron about his horrible stock calls

Comment by pennypincher
2008-02-01 10:05:44

they probley wont let the call thru to him. i am sure they screen all calls.

Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-01 12:53:28

you would have to call in AND the show is delayed, so if someone sneaked in , they would edit it out.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Michael Fink
2008-02-01 07:09:12

That chart was very interesting. However, the site linked from there (the one they tell you NOT to go to) is perhaps the most distrubing thing I have ever seen in my life. I have to drive an hour now to a client site, and, unfortunately, I have a feeling that will be on my mind for the entire trip.

Never, ever, ever, tell someone not to do something, they always will. Much to my displeasure. :(

Comment by FutureVulture
2008-02-01 08:44:50

Never, ever, ever, tell someone not to do something, they always will.

You mean like you just told us? :)

 
Comment by pennypincher
2008-02-01 10:19:03

LOL!!!! me too!!!! that is nasty!!!

Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-01 16:08:20

complain to the server/host company

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-01 06:34:15


Very bad Employment Report — Minus 17,000 for January 2008. Revisions for the past two months are offset (November revised down and Dec revised up).

Jas

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-01 06:46:07

The birth-death models need to be tweaked.

 
Comment by SDGreg
2008-02-01 06:56:21

http://tinyurl.com/2f8pvq

“The revision subtracted 376,000 jobs from the previous estimate for the year ended December 2007, bringing total job growth for the period to 1.137 million. ”

If the working assumption is that about 150,000 jobs need to added each month just to stay even, a loss of 17,000 is stunningly bad.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-02-01 11:49:21

Is it too early to rename the “birth-death model” to the “death-death model”?

I’d pay good money to see that (in gold, even!)

 
 
 
Comment by crispy&cole
2008-02-01 06:39:31

Dallas builder BK

Comment by txchick57
2008-02-01 06:43:56

Which one? I don’t see it. Where was it filed? Delaware?

I spent the past two days working with a friend on another large bankruptcy that is getting ready to be filed. Yea, the economy is great, isn’t it?

Comment by crispy&cole
Comment by crispy&cole
2008-02-01 06:50:23

Ok I misread the whole thing - they are part of TOUSA, subsidiary…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2008-02-01 06:52:53

I see they’ve already got their post petition financing in place and expect an uneventful reorganization. LOL. All I can say is I worked on the General Homes bankruptcy in 1990 and that was anything but uneventful. Filed in the S.D. Fla court.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2008-02-01 06:49:48

This is for Blano. I went digging around in my stuff and found this book which I think you should buy. It’s cheap - $29 and also comes with a DVD. It’s called “Intra-Day Trading Strategies” and is written by Jeff Cooper. It’s available through Traders Library. I learned almost everything I know from Jeff and still read his market report every morning and afternoon. He’s the best trader I’ve ever seen and I really sync with his take on things. The only thing I don’t like is he uses bar charts instead of candlesticks but that’s just a minor annoyance. Highly recommended.

Comment by Blano
2008-02-01 07:55:10

Txchick, you’re awesome. I’m accelerating my education as fast as I can. I will order it today. Thank you very much!!!

Comment by spike66
2008-02-01 08:20:44

just as an outsider, i think the exchanges on this blog between txchick and blano are some of the nicest i’ve seen on any blog.

 
 
Comment by SunDevil
2008-02-01 12:19:14

Yes, I must agree. I might pick up this book as well, just so I can understand what txchick57 is talking about most of the time. :)

 
Comment by Lip
2008-02-01 15:11:01

Thanks, now maybe I can have at least some idea what you’re talking about.

 
 
Comment by kckid
2008-02-01 06:59:07

Forbes Magazine has published a list of America’s most miserable cities. Before we get into this story any further, here’s the actual list:

1. Detroit, MI

2. Stockton, CA

3. Flint, MI

4. New York City

5. Philadelphia, PA

6. Chicago, IL

7. Los Angeles, CA

8. Modesto, CA

9. Charlotte, NC

10. Providence, RI

Forbes defines misery as a state of great unhappiness and emotional distress. Forbes used criteria such as unemployment, taxes, commute times, crime, pollution and weather.

Comment by txchick57
2008-02-01 07:02:34

You’ve got to be kidding. L.A. is on there but not Dallas? Who’s the writer being paid by? Next.

Comment by DeepInTheHeartOf
2008-02-01 09:30:57

txchick - I grew up around half way between #1 and #3 on that list (a little east of the midpoint), and please accept my personal experience that those places are significantly more miserable than DFW. Way more. When we visit there, my wife and other relatives ask why no one ever smiles. As to how Dallas ranks to the cities lower on the list, I can not say.

Comment by Blano
2008-02-01 09:36:23

Macomb County, perchance??

True, must be perspective, as Dallas sounds really nice from here, lol (I’m in Monroe County).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by DeepInTheHeartOf
2008-02-01 10:09:20

St. Clair County actually. Though I spent a lot of time at MCCC (not as a student though) over the years and worked in Roseville during my college years..

Macomb county really is Detroit suburbs as opposed to halfway between Detroit and Flint. Had relatives in Flint and that city was a truly depressed place… it never recovered from the ‘78-82 recession and auto industry downsizing.

 
 
 
Comment by Central Valley Guy
2008-02-01 11:30:35

And how in the world are there only 2 cities from Central California on there? My hometown of Fresno certainly deserves a ranking near the top. We’re so negative we have “no” in our town’s name!!
Although I am glad to see those dimwits at the northern end of the valley get their due. 60 Minutes pwned Stockton!!!

 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-01 07:11:00

OMG, we beat el Lay!?

Come visit Chicago this Monday, after today’s snow has turned gray/black/brown/yellow, and take a ride on the buses with slush covered floors and windows completely coated with rock salt residue. It makes the city from “Brazil” look like paradise.

Comment by ronin
2008-02-01 08:14:05

You ought to try Denver. They don’t use salt there to dispel snow/ice. They use ’sand.’

This is dirt with tiny stones. When you drive down the highway you risk getting your windshield starred from kicked up pebbles. The insides of busses, car windows, sidewalks, the world, is coated with slushy mud, slimy mud, or dried mud.

Comment by jim A
2008-02-01 08:18:15

That’s because below ~10 deg F, salt doesn’t melt snow and ice. All that you can do is put grit on top of it to improve traction.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2008-02-01 09:38:36

Its rarely that cold here ()daytime) on the front range. Here in Loveland they do use some funky chemical to melt ice, but only use it in choice spots.

Ice isn’t as big a problem here as in places like Oklahoma or the Carolinas. In fact, its pretty rare for roads to ice over here.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 10:56:20

The frozen tundra in el lay, is people not getting to know their neighbors…

A very anonymous place.

 
 
Comment by janna
2008-02-01 11:26:38

They spray something on the interstate. I drive on I-25 from N. CO to WY everyday. Dry to the state line, then boom! Packed snow, and sand. Right across the state line on icy days, there are almost always pickups, SUVs, etc. in the median or on in the barrow pit, who didn’t know it was about to get real slick.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2008-02-01 13:11:21

Also, as you approach the state line, elevation increases.

I used to drive to Laramie from Fort Collins on US 287. Same story. Roads dry and clean on the Colorado side, snowpacked as soon as you crossed into Wyoming. As far as we could tell, prompt plowing made the differnce. The remnant left over would quickly melt and evaporate if the sun was out. Snow pack on the other hand lasts for days.

 
 
 
Comment by Terry
2008-02-01 11:10:38

Hey, you live in the Midwest. Snow and ice are common. I’m sure if they didn’t salt or sand you’d complain about that too!.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2008-02-01 07:14:40

Charlotte and Providence? I thought those cities were doing relatively well. Showsya what I know.

Where’s Miami?

Comment by Kim
2008-02-01 08:23:57

Was surprised to see Providence on the list myself.

 
 
Comment by OTownCajun
2008-02-01 07:39:57

Where’s New Orleans?

 
Comment by neuromance
2008-02-01 07:58:57

Unfortunately, these sorts of polls are mostly meaningless. In 2006, Baltimore’s mayor was awarded Time Magazine’s Mayor of the Year award. At that time, Baltimore had the second or third highest murder rate in the country. It was also an election year (he is now governor of Maryland) It was generally accepted that his PR firm managed to successfully get the award for him.

Unless the criteria are clearly measurable, much of these polls are merely Letterman-ian Top Ten lists.

 
Comment by WT Economist
2008-02-01 09:22:46

Sounds like I would be less miserable if I moved from NYC to Buffalo.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-02-01 11:54:31

Everyone wants to live in…

No, sorry. Can’t do that with a straight face.

 
 
Comment by hd74man
2008-02-01 14:00:11

RE:10. Providence, RI

It’s the new mobster/strip club city here in the Northeast.

Huckstered as the new “in” location as the lemmings were priced out of Beantown suburbia.

A best friend who grew up in the area returned for a visit.

Says the place is like a Fort Apache with non-English speaking immigrants taking over all the urban density outlying towns.

 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-02-01 07:00:24

dollar down:

LONDON (AP) — The U.S. dollar was lower against other major currencies in European trading Friday morning. Gold rose.
The euro traded at $1.4894, up from $1.4877 late Thursday in New York

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080201/dollar_gold.html?.v=2

Comment by RoundSparrow
2008-02-01 08:14:02

TXChick may have called it this week on the major drop on gold. Hitting 910 right now.

Comment by RoundSparrow
2008-02-01 09:02:05

905, going below 900?

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-02-01 09:22:46

we’re short a little. Thanks again, Jeff Cooper (Blano)

Comment by Blano
2008-02-01 09:33:56

Gotcha.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 11:00:16

a 2% paper cut adjustment is a major drop?

Chicken little is better served, referencing real estate.

 
Comment by nhz
2008-02-01 11:22:29

brings back some old memories from the times, just some months ago, when the gold bashing efforts would start every friday as soon as the London market had closed …

 
Comment by Wheatie
2008-02-01 13:30:05

So, no one here really believes gold could be echoing the 1980 collapse?

 
Comment by Halifax
2008-02-01 13:35:03

For those p*king up long gold positions:

From Reminiscences of a Stock Operator:

Turkey: “Why, this is a bull market!”
(The old fellow said it as though he had given a detailed explanation.)

Elmer: “I know this is a bull market as well as you do. But you’d better slip them that stock of yours and buy it back on the reaction. You might as well reduce the cost to yourself.

Turkey: “My dear boy, if I sold that stock now I’d lose my position; and then where would I be? And when you are as old as I am and you’ve been through as many booms and panics as I have, you’ll know that to lose your position is something nobody can afford; not even John D. Rockefeller. I hope the stock reacts and that you will be able to repurchase your line at a substantial concession, sir. But I myself can only trade in accordance with the experience of many years. I paid a high price for it and I don’t feel like throwing away a second tuition fee. But I am as much obliged to you as if I had the money in the bank. It’s a bull market, you know.”

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-02-01 07:01:40

housing meltdown:

And that could be just the start. Brace yourself: Home prices could sink an additional 25% over the next two or three years, returning values to their 2000 levels in inflation-adjusted terms. That’s even with the Federal Reserve’s half-percentage-point rate cut on Jan. 30 .

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_06/b4070040767516.htm?campaign_id=rss_null

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-02 02:22:16

Is anyone else confused that they melted a Monopoly hotel rather than a “house” for the cover photo? ;)

 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-02-01 07:04:03

greenscam denies blame:

STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - Ex-Federal Reserve chief Alan Greenspan told a Stockholm audience on Friday he did not believe he had caused the U.S. subprime crisis and had warned of the risk in 2004, a person attending the event said.

http://tinyurl.com/2bxr4v

Comment by palmetto
2008-02-01 07:11:28

Greedscam is the ultimate revisionist.

 
Comment by SDGreg
2008-02-01 07:59:58

Utter crap. Wasn’t he telling people to take out ARM’s as late as 2005?
Which will be gone first, his legacy or his life?

 
Comment by jim A
2008-02-01 10:58:26

Since he qualified EVERYTHING he said, it isn’t hard to quotemine and make him out to be idiot or savant.

 
Comment by Sekar
2008-02-01 11:39:42

He should be arrested by the FBI at the airport if he tries to reenter the United States. All roads in the FBI investigation of the the subprime crisis will lead to the Fed, which is partially owned by big banks.

 
 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-02-01 08:42:08

Man, putting the counterspin on his legacy has turned into a full-time job for Al.

 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-02-01 07:05:49

Merrill to pay up:

Feb. 1 (Bloomberg) — Merrill Lynch & Co. agreed to pay Springfield, Massachusetts, $13.9 million to settle a dispute over collateralized debt obligations it sold the city that plunged in value.

http://tinyurl.com/yrpm7p

Comment by flatffplan
2008-02-01 07:15:17

wow, that’s just 1 small city
multiply times 10,000 and you got a problem

 
Comment by ghostwriter
2008-02-01 07:51:37

Feb. 1 (Bloomberg) — Merrill Lynch & Co. agreed to pay Springfield, Massachusetts, $13.9 million to settle a dispute over collateralized debt obligations it sold the city that plunged in value.

Look out below. Things are going to come crashing down.

 
Comment by Ernest
2008-02-01 09:19:50

It reminds me of the kids game. Find the one that is different. Problem is, as the rocks get turned over it seems none of them are different.

It is contained! Kontained, cantained, konedtained, constained, connedtained…

 
Comment by Tom
2008-02-01 10:48:40

Here we go. Besides writedowns, all these banks are going to be sued and have to pay up big.

 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2008-02-01 07:08:16

The government cut jobs, too. All those cuts swamped job gains in education, health care, retailing and elsewhere.

huh, not here in fedland- all raises and still hiring at 80k a pop

Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-01 13:10:31

I think that TSA security jobs at the airports will start RETAINING job holders, although the job is as exciting as mud and has a 40% retention rate. This economy just might do that retention trick.
@ $14.00 hr pt or $29k ft.

 
 
Comment by kckid
2008-02-01 07:13:28

What we now owe in Medicare benefits, but have no way of paying, totals $34.1 trillion — or 2 1/2 times our entire GDP. (This does not include Social Security, which adds another $17 trillion to future liabilities.)

Put still another way, it means that each of us is responsible for a debt of $355,000 just to pay Medicare.

That bland wording is another way of saying the system is all but bankrupt. The deficits are expected to be so large that only a 122% hike in payroll taxes, or a cut of 51% in benefits, would bring the program into balance.

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=286674837414973

Comment by ghostwriter
2008-02-01 07:50:21

Health care costs in this country are ridiculous. With an average family premium of $800-1200 a month (with a $4-5k out of pocket), if someone netted $2000 a month, how in the h*ll could they even live, let alone pay any out of pocket expenses. Even the prescription coverage for the medicare people gave huge subsidies to the drug companies. Then they tied the hands of people buying in Canada where prices are 1/4 to 1/3 the price of the same drug here. I say if the drug companies can sell their drugs to the Canadians at that price, why are we Americans getting screwed.

Comment by In Colorado
2008-02-01 10:05:29

I say if the drug companies can sell their drugs to the Canadians at that price, why are we Americans getting screwed.

Because we have a “free market”. At some point the house of cards will come crashing down. Then big pharma and the entire healthcare industry will learn how life is for the rest of us.

 
 
 
Comment by Tom
2008-02-01 07:16:53

Exxon reports the highest quarterly profit in history. Chevron isn’t far behind. Royal Dutch Shell smashed records too.

So…. who benefits from the runup in oil prices? : )

Comment by watcher
2008-02-01 07:28:32

The price of oil has risen a lot in dollar terms, but not in euros. What we are seeing is dollar devaulation, more than rising oil prices. I suspect the record profits of oil companies, which are global companies, are not records when measured in non-dollar currencies.

Comment by Bronco
2008-02-01 13:09:45

This is right on. Interesting how the government feigns concern over increasing energy costs, when it is their own damn fault from a policy of aggressive devaluation of the dollar.

 
 
Comment by nhz
2008-02-01 11:26:51

who benefits? easy: Chavez, Ahmadinejad, couple of sheiks, Nigerian gangsters, Cheney & friends etc.

for the record, Dutch Shell is close to breaking its trendline, to the downside …

 
 
Comment by VirginiaTechDan
2008-02-01 07:18:00

Things are starting to sink in for the public.

Seven months ago, shortly after I discovered the HBB, I learned about how screwed our financial system and the housing market is. Against much resistance from my wife and all of her female friends we sold our house in October 07.

My wife and I are in a church group of about 5 couples that meet together weekly. I did my best to warn them of the impending doom, but they were convinced that macro-economic events are “hard” to predict and that if we did have a recession it would be like the 2001/2002 recession.

Anyway, last night was a watershed night. Three of the couples are now planning on selling in order to rent. They finally connected the dots that they do not want to live in their current house for the next 5 years and that they will lose significant money the longer they wait to sell. Needless to say, they have a lot more respect for my decision now.

Sadly, two of the couples are about 15K underwater on their home and they have no savings. They are even competing against each other in the same townhouse community. They bought with 100% financing two years ago.

I am trying to advise them how they should handle the situation. The way I see it, they either borrow money from family to bring to closing, sell short, or go into foreclosure.

What advice would the HBB have on how to arrange a short sale? Can it be done if they are current on the mortgage and have the capability to pay the mortgage (for now, they have their first child on the way).

According to my estimates, they stand to lose between 30K and 60K if they holdout till the bottom. They bought for $155,000 when similar townhouses can be rented for $900/month.

Comment by BubbleViewer
2008-02-01 08:03:28

I think people in church groups might have a stronger sense of morality. That is, “I signed a contract; I should honor it.”
I say to heck with that BS. We live in a world of corporate greed. The people who created this mess don’t care about your friends or have any morality.
I think your friends should make the decision based on a cold-hearted, objective analysis of what makes the best financial sense for them, with no guilt or moral misgivings whatsoever.
It’s a business decision. (It would be different if we had communities like 50 years ago, but as someone has pointed out, houses have become like used cars. That’s all.)

 
Comment by palmetto
2008-02-01 08:13:01

“My wife and I are in a church group of about 5 couples that meet together weekly. I did my best to warn them of the impending doom, but they were convinced that macro-economic events are “hard” to predict and that if we did have a recession it would be like the 2001/2002 recession.”

Good for you, Dan. Often, we tend to feel helpless in the face of “macro” events like this bubble. We wonder what we can do about it. Well, the answer is, we do what we can where we live. That means talking to people and getting the message out, even if it is unpopular. It means calling local gov officials and making your views known. It means doing exactly what you did.

 
Comment by caveat_emptor
2008-02-01 08:17:52

I’m going to assume the plan is to sell, rent while waiting out price declines, and then possibly buy when prices have stabilized.
I think this might make sense in a high cost area- if you sell for $750K, rent for a few years, and then buy back a similar home at, let’s say, $500K (33% price drop nominal, who knows with inflation), then you’ve essentially banked $250K. But, you can’t forget transaction costs, moving costs, etc. After “the crash” what will loan costs be?

On a $150K townhouse, I’m not sure it makes as much sense. What are the costs (monetary, and stress) of moving at least twice. What’s the “best case” gain, if things work out as they predict? I know that $30K, over several years, would not entice me to pack up and move out of my house.

I’m kind of sitting “in between” those examples. My house, cost ~$400K, in early ‘07. My expectation is that the nominal value might be expected to drop %33, a $133K haircut. But, I like my house. It’s taken a year to finally feel like we’re settled in. Transaction costs to sell it would be over $25K. I’ve read that a big move is the second most stressful thing (after a death in the family) most folks go through. I’ve done it a few times, and I believe it. I can comfortably afford my - fixed - payments. We plan to stay put. Frankly the more the market crashes, the better position I’m in; assuming I’m looking to upgrade next time I move. If the price of my house, and my future house collapse in tandem, then the price differential between the two just gets smaller.

Comment by jim A
2008-02-01 08:26:04

ISTM that the biggest factor is the rent/mortgage differential. How much money do you save (if, you actually SAVE it)every month, rather than how much negative equity will you have. I bought pre-bubble in ‘99 so I would currently pay more to rent a place equivalent to my current house. Even if the price goes down 100k (which is perfectly possible IMHO), it doesn’t make alot of sense for me to sell.

 
Comment by VirginiaTechDan
2008-02-01 08:48:14

It is a matter of perspective, while a 30 to 60K loss would be nothing for me, for a teacher it represents a 1 to 2 years worth of post-tax income. They are living in a two bedroom town house and starting a family so will be moving anyway. The thing that sunk in is that “hey, we might want/need to move in a few years”.

Transaction costs are much less particularly if they used a fixed fee listing agent and do 2% commission for the buying agent. $4,000 fee + moving costs. They would save several hundred dollars per month by renting AND get a bigger place for their growing family.

I think there is a large percentage of the public that bought assuming they could sell at any time and not lose a ton of money.

Comment by jim A
2008-02-01 11:01:21

Well alot of people couldn’t lose a ton of money if their loan is non-recourse because they never put a ton of money down. If things get as bad as they might, you’ll see a real rate differential between recourse and non-recourse loans.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2008-02-01 10:06:36

“What advice would the HBB have on how to arrange a short sale? Can it be done if they are current on the mortgage and have the capability to pay the mortgage….”

I’m observing a short-sale. The lender ignored the sellers until they stopped making payments. Each time an offer is presented, the sellers have to prove they do not have the ability to pay the mortgage.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-02-01 10:09:22

Sadly, two of the couples are about 15K underwater on their home and they have no savings.

Not even a a 401(k), huh? Not surprising. I know far too many 20 and 30 somethings that drive 50K cars, but who don’t have even two dimes saved because “they don’t believe in 401(k)s”, not even with the 100% matching funds. Oh well.

Comment by In Colorado
2008-02-01 13:13:02

After some thought, I realized that what they really don’t believe in is driving a 20K domestic car.

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-02-01 20:08:37

Dan,

You have nothing to gain in advising your friends, except ego. They will do what they want regardless of your advice, and if you call it wrong (or right and they screw up more) you will carry the blame. Their late inquiry for advice is more like “Oh my, I’ve screwed myself, can I blame it on you?”

 
 
Comment by New in NM
2008-02-01 07:26:06

I was checking in on my 403b (like a 401k for people in research/education) and saw in tiny print at the bottom of the page that TIAA CREF does not allow people reallocate money out of its real estate fund via the web. (One of the six fund options for where I used to work, cleverly introduced in 2006) Instead you have to call them, plus you are limited in the number of withdrawals per year, as if people wouldn’t look at how much money they’ve lost, scream like crazy, and move it all at once.

Comment by CA renter
2008-02-02 05:44:31

Wow. Hope you’ll be on the phone first thing Monday morning! ;)

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 07:34:59

Everything is green today as far as the eye can see (note that falling l-t T-bond yields — the only red numbers on the list — are indicative of rising l-t T-bond prices). Short covering rally?

http://www.marketwatch.com/tools/marketsummary/

Comment by txchick57
2008-02-01 08:04:38

the agenda’s pretty clear

party on, Garth

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 08:31:50

This morning’s action is again beginning to resemble the Challenger’s trajectory. This does not rule out the possibility of liquidity injections to add more greenery by later in the day…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2008-02-01 08:48:51

Nice reversal! 1400 S&P is going to be tough to crack.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 09:28:39

Some great reflation opportunities present themselves on days when the news is very grim. What I personally don’t understand is why bad news some times leads to massive stock market selloffs, and other times results in very green numbers. Some times I take the impression that Wall Street has turned into a giant headless chicken running around the barnyard.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 09:31:26

The gold price bears watching today. I am not an expert on coordinated asset price dynamics, but my intuition tells me that while the Fed cannot control all the prices all of the time, they can control a subset of the prices (e.g. gold price) some of the time, and use these controls to drive other prices (e.g. headline stock market indexes) the direction of their choosing.

All comments are welcome :-)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 09:51:49

Seems like the plan is to keep those headline indexes as green as possible until Goldilocks feels better. She was last seen accompanying Dorothy on the way to the storm cellar.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2008-02-01 07:40:33

Here’s an anecdotal: Even as I post here this AM, my email keeps clicking with drastically reduced offers from an RE investor looking to unload in Fla. The properties are in places like St. Pete and the less desirable parts of Tampa, marginal slum properties, but still, I’m amused by the frantic clicking.

 
Comment by bizarroworld
2008-02-01 08:01:23

Payrolls Drop for 1st Time Since 2003
http://tinyurl.com/2lyhdl

Job losses were widespread. Manufacturers, construction firms and a variety of professional and business services eliminated jobs in January — reflecting the toll of the housing and credit debacles. The government cut jobs, too. All those cuts swamped job gains in education, health care, retailing and elsewhere.

Wage growth also slowed, another indication that employers are tightening their belts amid the economic slowdown.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 09:34:40

Repeat until your face turns blue:

“Growth slowdown, no recession.
Growth slowdown, no recession.
Growth slowdown, no recession.
…”

Comment by RoundSparrow
2008-02-01 11:55:36

PB: But many business owners will believe recession.

I mean the party [growth] isn’t over. They bar has run out of johnnie Walker Blue and has shifted to johnnie Walker Green and rumors we may have to cut back to johnnie Walker Black. All are good, but the cutback is something these people [addicts] believe have never happened in history.

Wait until they are drinking Jim Beam Rye [which I like at times believe it or not, but it is $16 a bottle here in Texas]… and then the total no-name no-quality stuff ;) Oh, then the party may eventually run out of drink all together….

 
 
 
Comment by ghostwriter
2008-02-01 08:07:13

I posted on here a few days ago about lifesize 400# bronze statue of a boy & girl sitting on a bench reading a book being stolen from the front of the libary.

Today in the paper they said they recovered it at a scrap yard in Youngstown. I saw a picture of one of the thieves. Now tell me the owner of that yard believed 2 shabby looking 20 year olds owned a bronze statue that cost $12,500, and were willing to sell it for $331. Anyway it’s now in police custody and will be returned after they apprehend the 2nd thief. There was no mention of the copper downspouts stolen off the Lutheran Church.

Look out people, if you go on vacation, you could come home and find out you have no plumbing or even outdoor light fixtures. I’m sure this is going to get worse before it gets better as more and more people become desparate for money and the price of metals rises.

They’re also arraigning the boyfriend, girlfriend and boy’s mother in the $7M plus heist that happened a month an a half ago. I’m sure that made national news when it happened. He worked for the security company, and over time learned all the codes to get into the storage building where the money was kept. What shocked me was the types of buildings they store this money in. Unobtrusive buildings in lowly populated areas. This particular building was nothing but a three car garage with a brick front. Once they showed that building, I’m sure there will be many thieves following armored trucks around to see where they stash the cash.

 
Comment by A.B. Dada
2008-02-01 08:44:50

Good morning folks — nice snow here in the Midwest.

I was reading through yesterday’s Bit Bucket (been sick), and noticed a few things that concerned me, regarding some people’s interpretation of various values in the investment markets.

First, I noticed some people say that while gold at US$930/ounce is at a record high, it also is not a value on par with the previous recorded high over US$870 or so, because of the drop in value of the US dollar. Then, they went to say that “gold would have to be US$3000 to be equal to the previous high value.” I agree with this, but I think that if you’re going to explain this to people, you made a big error. You should say taht “gold TODAY would have to be US$3000 in today’s dollars to be equal to the previous high value. If gold hits US$3000 in the future, that number might be way too low still if the dollar continues to plummet.” If gold hits US$3000 in 2011, it might still be 50% too low compared to the previous inflated high, because the dollar may have fallen another 50% by then.

Secondly, when comparing GDP growth and talking about recessions, we have been in a recession for YEARS. GDP is calculated as the total market value of all goods and services over a period of time, usually a year. When quarterly GDP growth has stalled, usually for a few quarters, we consider ourselves to be in a recession.

Now, how is GDP factored based on monetary devaluation, i.e. the effects of monetary inflation (creating more money)? The Keynesian liars that call themselves economics shrug off the effects of monetary inflation on GDP, or only factor the official inflation reports (CPI) while ignoring the reality of price increases and wage increases based on a falling dollar.

If you look at more “true” price increases over a few recent years, and use THAT number as a subtraction from GDP growth, you will see that we have been in a recession for many, many years.

Just my 1.5 cents.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 08:48:42

The best thing about Gold, in the current financial climate?

It is the ONLY financial instrument that benefits from fraudulent behavior.

Everything else gets the whack-a-mole…

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 09:37:14

What if CBs are some how using gold price declines to prop up favored asset classes? (Not trying to suggest this could ever happen, but…)

http://www.marketwatch.com/tools/quotes/intchart.asp?symb=GC08J&sid=2337992&dist=TQP_chart_date&freq=9&time=1

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 09:56:15

I’m a decade trader, not a day trader…

Let them play all the game they’d like.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 10:17:18

Fair nuff… good luck with DCA into gold (seriously — I would do it myself if it did not seem late in the game to me…)

 
Comment by MaryLee
2008-02-02 02:29:10

Actually isn’t too late Prof…..

 
 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-02-01 09:57:49

Someone is trying to hold the line on the USD index at 75. Probably the gold price action is related. Also there was a rumor of a large sale by a Euro fund this morning.

http://quotes.ino.com/chart/?s=NYBOT_DX&v=s

I’m not a gold buyer or seller at this price level.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 10:23:05

One possible interpretation:

- Gold and l-t T-bonds are both flight-to-quality asset classes.

- A flight to l-t T-bonds helps support the standing of the $US as a safe-haven reserve currency (after all, a l-t T-bond is no more nor less than a promised future nominally-fixed series of future $US payments).

- Making gold seem like a risky bet drives the flow of money towards l-t T-bonds, and shores up the dollar’s standing as a safe-haven investment (never mind the relative value of current versus future dollars, as reflected in dollar exchange rates versus l-t T-bond prices).

Comment by watcher
2008-02-01 11:00:03

Gold and the USD are manipulated over the short run. The price action before a rate cut, for example, is gold down/dollar up every time.

Bonds, IMO, are heavily influenced by central banks parking money there. I never would have believed yields would get this low, but they have. I have no idea why anyone would buy bonds at these levels.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 12:04:56

“I have no idea why anyone would buy bonds at these levels.”

That’s what my post was trying to explain.

 
Comment by Wheatie
2008-02-01 14:00:38

How do you manipulate the USD over the short run? Really, the forex market is by far the largest market in the world and I am supposed to believe there is some contingent that can manipulate the dollar in the short-term? Puuuuhhhhleeeezzz!

 
Comment by RoundSparrow
2008-02-01 14:37:52

How do you manipulate the USD over the short run?

You trade it, you buy or sell.
http://www.google.com/search?q=bank++japan+intervention

Japan made it public they were doing this… and did it in large bulk. Just do at a slower pace and don’t make it public.

 
Comment by Hoz
2008-02-01 15:34:10

Japan, China, Malaysia, Thailand and a few other Asian countries manipulate their currency. The only (known) time the US manipulated its currency was to support the Euro. It has happened.

The risk in manipulation is when the supporting nation is wrong as an example when Great Britain tried to support the Pound, Mr. George Soros slammed it. Great Britain did not have ammo to hold its position, Soros won.

The current treasury position (ignoring what the mopes say but looking at what the mopes do) is to devalue the dollar by 15%. It is not profitable to fight the fed.

 
Comment by Wheatie
2008-02-01 19:22:26

OK. So maybe my definition of short-term is not the same as someone else. My short-term is under 24 hours. Soros, Japan, etc. were “manipulating” over a much longer time frame.

Crediting Soros with sinking the Pound is ridiculous. Soros was short in a big way and he happened to be right. People are constantly attributing reason to market moves in retrospect, even when the reasons have been proven wrong over and over (ie. correlation of oil price and the stock market). How many people are trying to find a “reason” why homebuilder stocks rose recently with continued bludgeoning of home sales/price on this blog? Sometimes (most times IMO), it’s all technical ebb and flow.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2008-02-01 08:50:25

We will start a a bit of a gold short.

Comment by sm_landlord
2008-02-01 11:05:07

OK, but what will your exit criteria be?

I assume that you are planning to play short-term volatility using futures?

Comment by watcher
2008-02-01 11:39:25

I found one reason for the drop today; South African mines have reopened, at least for now.

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-02-01 13:58:16

Same as any other. Support and fibonnaci retracements.

Comment by Wheatie
2008-02-01 14:02:51

Bingo, txchick!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by WatchingTheSagaUnfold
 
Comment by forepaws
2008-02-01 09:14:14

First time posting here… I’ve been reading this blog for probably close to two years, and it’s been the absolute best source of real info about housing, so thanks to Ben and all the folks who post here.

Someone (I think maybe txchick57) posted an article about foreclosure pets a few days ago. It happened to be the day after I spoke with the head of our local SPCA about the same issue. (My wife and I foster puppies for them, and I was trying to convince them that they should an “owner surrender fee”—which they don’t currently have—ASAP before the tidal wave of pets from foreclosures comes flooding in. Truthfully, in our area, I don’t know how bad it’ll get. It’s mostly rural, but then again, all the surrounding counties show up as pretty severe on the nationwide foreclosure map someone posted yesterday.)

I wanted to do something to try and help these pets (other than the fostering we always do), so I registered the domain name forepaws.org and plan to create an online resource for assisting foreclosure pets. I don’t know exactly what that means yet, but with the response the original “foreclosure pets” link got here, I thought you guys might have some good ideas. I plan on including specific info about no-kill shelters in high-foreclosure areas, and it would be nice to have some sort of Paypal donation thing set up to send to exemplary shelters in high-foreclosure areas, maybe changing every week or two. Can I set up something like that without having to worry about claiming the Paypal donations as “income” that I then donate? I don’t know anything about that sort of thing.

Anyhow, I was wondering if you guys have any ideas about what would be good to include on a site intended to help foreclosure pets. Thanks in advance for your help! (And please, let’s avoid the whole “pets aren’t as important as kids” debate again, because it’s moot… as soon as I hear about a rash of homeowners leaving their children tied up in the back yard when they move out, maybe I’ll make a site for them, too.)

Comment by txchick57
2008-02-01 09:24:57

You can email me off line if you wish. I manage the paypal account for one of my rescue groups.

I wouldn’t charge a surrender fee. Most of them can’t afford it. We ask nicely for one but do not turn a pet away because the owner can’t or won’t pay it.

Comment by txchick57
2008-02-01 09:33:28

I can also do your 501(c)(3) (for free). You really need that so people can make tax deductible contributions.

Comment by txchick57
2008-02-01 09:35:52

I can also write grants and have a list of pet related companies who give quite a bit of money to rescue.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by forepaws
2008-02-01 09:56:09

txchick57–

Thanks for the response. I don’t know how to get in contact with you, but I’ve set up a gmail account using the same name as the site (forepaws).

The position of our local SPCA is that they worry people won’t be willing to pay the surrender fee and will just take the pet to Animal Control. But I have a few reasons for arguing in favor of the fee: 1) our local SPCA works with Animal Control anyway, so if a healthy adoptable pet gets dropped of there, they’ll most likely take it in anyway; 2) they can always waive the fee for hardship cases, but can’t institute a “luxury fee” if someone comes in looking like they can afford it; and 3) I think people who take the time to contact the SPCA about possibly surrendering their pet tend to be more willing to pony up than the average schmuck who just calls Animal Control or tries to give a way his dog in front of Wal-Mart. I think we might be seeing a slightly different breed of people giving up their pets. Especially in times to come, I think we’ll see a lot of displaced families who really do care for their pet, and if there were some way for them to keep it, they would… for these folks, I think paying what it would cost for a few nights’ stay at a kennel in order to ensure their pet will a) not be killed, b) get any medical treatment it might need, and c) be placed in a loving home… would be worth it. In fact, that would be one of my motivations for creating the site: explaining to people just how much it costs to care for a shelter dog compared to how much they pay for their dog anyway. It really starts to look like a bargain. Not that I can imagine ever giving up my dogs for anything… there’s no way I’d move anywhere without them, and I’ll admit I don’t relate to people who could do that. But given the housing woes about to befall America, I can sympathize a little.

I don’t know how much time I’m going to have available for this little pipe-dream… I’m a writer, and I’m trying to finish a multi-volume encyclopedia that’s due in a couple weeks, and I’ve got another multi-volume book lined up immediately after… but I’d like to have a site that would complement existing sites like petfinder, without trying to do what they already do (and they do it well).

 
 
Comment by octal77
2008-02-01 12:21:32


I wanted to do something to try and help these pets…

Forepaws, txchick57 and others:

Thanks for posting your story. It helps reaffirm my faith
in humanity..

My own approach was to donate my Chevy S-10 truck
to Cars-for-Causes with the proceeds earmarked for
the local Orange County, Ca. Animal Assistance League.

I personally adopted a wonderful cat who was dumped
in our neighborhood and happened to find my backyard.
He was cold, tired, hungry, dirty and just wanted a little
to eat. Well, I took him in and now, just like another
poster noted earlier, “animals *are* my family*.

I couldn’t be happier.

IMHO, what is happening to many of these animals is in
itself a bigger tragedy that the housing bubble itself.

Comment by forepaws
2008-02-01 12:29:39

octal77–

Thanks for sharing. I’m actually from Orange County originally (and my wife and I are hoping to go back after the housing market is sufficiently toasted). Our first dog was adopted from the OC Animal Shelter… man, what an abysmal place. She’s a beautiful German Shepherd who was found wandering the streets of Fullerton. We got her on the day she was up for “re-evaluation”… meaning her three week stay of execution was up, and that probably would’ve been it for her. I’ve vowed to support no-kill shelters as much as possible, but by the same token, it’s hard not to help the ones you KNOW are in danger.

Comment by spike66
2008-02-01 12:41:39

Be glad to help you as well. I give my donations to dogtown’s Best Friends site and the local North Shore Animal League,
both of which rescue animals and are no-kill shelters. Let me know how to post my email without getting spammed, and you can contact me offline.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by forepaws
2008-02-01 15:44:28

spike–

Thanks. I don’t know a foolproof way to post without being spammed… I mentioned a few posts up that I opened a gmail account using the name of the site (forepaws) as the user name, so if you can email me there with your contact info, that would probably be the safest bet.

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-01 16:39:55

Set up a yahoo account just for the contact, make contact, then never use it again, yahoo will shut it down eventually. Good way to make contact with someone, then you can trade real email accounts.

Great idea for the webpage, once you get it going, contact Best Friends and tell them about it and my guess is they’ll work with you on rescues and advice as much as they can. Best of luck, if I can help any, contact me at gumshoereporter@yahoo.com, though I’m out in the backcountry a lot with no internet.

 
 
 
 
Comment by MaryLee
2008-02-02 02:33:27

Forget the fees for these folk. Clearly, they don’t care/prioritize their animals, and if charged to leave them, will just dump them in the countryside, as we see here. Sickening.

 
 
Comment by ghostwriter
2008-02-01 09:24:51

Apparently the realtors have put their network together again to bombard Washington with their opinion on the loan limits. They do this all time, nationally and in various states. In Ohio one time they shut down the computer system at the state with their emails. That was for a good cause, because they were fighting the state so the state wouldn’t add on hundreds and hundreds of dollars in transaction fees, that they would pocket.

http://takeaction.realtoractioncenter.com/campaign/sen_econstimulus?rk=71L9IwsqfzZsW

There’s no where on there to give a differing opinion or I would have. I still have my license, although I don’t practice anymore, and there’s no way I want the gov to do anything that will hold or boost prices. This whole country needs to correct big time. I guess they’re too stupid to figure out that sustaining prices is going to give them even less buyers, as most don’t have wages to support the house prices. I do live in an area where prices are in line with wages, so maybe that’s why this girl sent this to me. I also live in an area where there’s few jobs, so the pool of buyers is limited. Hope the line works.

Comment by jim A
2008-02-01 11:07:07

Why would realtors in Ohio want to raise the limits? Do they WANT California to deplete the coffers of Fannie and Freddie?

 
 
Comment by cashedin05
2008-02-01 09:37:14

Yahoo Finance main page has the following poll question:

“How would you characterize Ben Bernanke’s performance as chairman of the Federal Reserve?

Excellent
Above average
Eh
Below average
Poor”

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 10:01:54

– It is way too early to tell. (I realize that Jimmy Cramer thinks he knows better, but consider the source and ignore it.)

– I generally disagree with the concept of a bunch of Yahoos rating BB’s performance.

– How can the results be fair, given the mess he had on his hands the day he started his job?

 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-02-01 09:46:59

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 07:55:10
‘HAL: I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.’

And then, after thinking and getting smarter and evaluating his on-site observations, he tried to kill everybody.
There’s a moral here of some sort, but dang if I can see it.

 
Comment by Austrian School
2008-02-01 09:47:11

Anyone else see the headline on Bloomberg that talk about the states not helping with the Bush mortgage help of state issues tax free bonds to fund refinancings. Apparently the states don’t want crappy loans any more than the private banks. And also, you actually have to document assets and incomes to qualify to participate in these programs, so very few people in trouble qualify. some spokesman for some REIC backed trade group calls the programs PR program.

 
 
Comment by Blacque Jacques Shellacque
2008-02-01 09:54:58

Supreme Court Nullifies Oakland, Los Angeles ‘Subprime’ Lending Laws

At issue is so-called subprime lending to people with risky credit histories at interest rates five or six percentage points higher than traditional loans. Consumer advocates consider the practice to be predatory and…

For the thousandth time, nobody is forcing people to borrow money at higher interest rates. For Heaven’s sake, do the fecking math. If the interest rate on some loan will result in payments that are going to cause a whole lotta hurt in the pocketbook, or even if something just doesn’t seem right, DON’T SIGN ON TO IT.

It’s really that simple.

Comment by RoundSparrow
2008-02-01 12:26:01

Payday loan places are predatory… but you don’t see them fixing that problem.

Comment by warlock
2008-02-01 14:19:25

Ah, here’s the toy car your son wanted. Apparently some of them have lead paint, but that’s alright. You’ll be running your own spectra-graphical analysis before you let him play with it, I’m sure.

Law’s don’t exist to protect the poor from the rich. They exist to protect the rich from the poor. You don’t think you’re rich? Trust me, you look pretty rich to the poor factory owner in China whose just saved a few hundred dollars on unleaded paint.

Payday loan places wouldn’t be allowed in a civilized society either.

 
 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 10:06:02

“Yes, this is an age of moral crisis. Yes, you are bearing punishment for your evil. But it is not man who is now on trial and it is not human nature that will take the blame. It is your moral code that’s through, this time. Your moral code has reached its climax, the blind alley at the end of its course. And if you wish to go on living, what you now need is not to return to morality—you who have never known any—but to discover it.”

John Galt

 
Comment by black swan
2008-02-01 10:14:10

I have a question for Mr. Hoz.

A few months ago, you mentioned Sprott Asset Management funds as possible investments. On their website, I clicked on the Sprott Molybdenum Participation Corporation for additional information. Apparently this is restricted and not available to “US persons”. Could you please explain what this is about. Thanks.

Comment by black swan
2008-02-01 10:34:38

Anyone else, please feel free to respond.

Comment by Hoz
2008-02-01 11:24:58

By viewing this website, you hereby acknowledge and agree that you are either:

A. Not in the United States of America or a “U.S person” (such term is defined in United States federal securities laws), or

B. If in the United States of America, you are viewing the presentation solely in your capacity as a professional fiduciary of an entity which is not a “U.S person” (such term is defined in United States federal securities laws).

The Company closed its Initial Public Offering on April 16, 2007. An aggregate of 37,800,000 units were sold at $5.00 CAD per Unit, for aggregate gross proceeds of $189,000,000. Each Unit consists of one common share in the capital of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to acquire, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances, one common share of the Corporation at a price of $7.50 until April 16, 2009. The common shares and warrants are listed on the Toronto Stock exchange under the symbol MLY and MLY.WT, respectively

 
Comment by black swan
2008-02-01 12:09:27

Thanks Hoz and Polly.

 
 
Comment by polly
2008-02-01 11:35:46

They aren’t registered in the US and can’t sell to US persons. The SEC would go after them. If the investment fund is set up with a master/feeder structure and has a US feeder fund that is registered and open to regular folks, you should be able to find it. Otherwise, you are out of luck.

Comment by Hoz
2008-02-01 12:08:57

Actually, US citizens could not buy on the IPO. If you are eligible to purchase on the TSX, then you should be able to buy - call your broker. currently trading at $C 3.96

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-01 10:39:04

ECONOMIC REPORT
U.S. construction outlays off 1.1% in December
By Robert Schroeder, MarketWatch
Last update: 10:12 a.m. EST Feb. 1, 2008

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Spending on U.S. construction projects fell by 1.1% in December as outlays on private residential construction took another tumble, government data showed Friday.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-says-construction-spending-dropped/story.aspx?guid=%7B5E208D64%2DDF1A%2D42E8%2D8A12%2DEC52907A50AD%7D

 
Comment by Blano
 
Comment by takingbets
2008-02-01 11:26:24

question: what is the worst possible reasonable guess to what will / might happen to someone who is holding quite a bit of money in mutual funds and IRA’s during this market madness? thankyou in advance for answers to my question.

Comment by Sekar
2008-02-01 11:34:03

if we look at japan in the 90s, i think that’s what will play out. The Nikkei has never reached the levels it did in the early 90s before deflation took place in Japan. And that was in a place with very little land and real estate available to begin with.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 11:36:19

I suspect 401k’s are being sold off currently, in amounts that would astound everybody, if truth were told.

There are much financial incest going on in mutual funds, as a bunch of them invest in other mutual funds…

Take your tax hit and get out dodge.

60% of something, beats the heck out of 100% of nothing.

 
Comment by polly
2008-02-01 11:43:20

Please note that mutual funds and IRA’s are not mutually exclusive entities. Lots of people invest their IRA money in mutual funds. IRA is a tax designation. Mutual funds are investment vehicle.

The answer to your question depends entirely on your circumstances. Some mutual funds have already lost a lot of value and will loose a lot more. Some will do better. Loosing money that you have saved is bad, but it is less bad than loosing money that you borrowed and still have to pay back.

Comment by takingbets
2008-02-01 12:13:44

from june 1st to dec 31st i am up 60 bucks on the mutual fund. it keeps loosing / gaining / loosing / gaining / im wondering if it will start to lose and not gain back. its in Royal Alliance.

Comment by Diggs
2008-02-01 13:18:58

According to magic 8-ball, all signs point to yes!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-02-01 13:47:39

i rode this last few days of gains up in my 401k and put the last cash i had in those funds over to the 4.25% rate which is good for all of 2008

at worst il get 4.25% on my money this year

 
Comment by Sekar
2008-02-01 15:38:23

that rate may not be that high this year given the Fed rate is now 3% and likely going lower in March. They are really trying to force everyone to take the risk of catching a knife.

 
 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-01 16:57:53

I’m relly not a speling nazi, but its LOSE and LOOSE. loose is like in loose lips sink ships and lose is like in losers get worked up over bad speling.

If it’s pronounced with a z sound, spell it LOSE. Thx, just my pet peeve, sorry to take up bandwidth, Ben, but attorneys need to know how to spell correctly.

(English has a non-vocalized sibilant and a vocalized one and they’re spelled differently. Just sayin’.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 17:04:12

Lots of people played fast and lose.

 
Comment by spike66
2008-02-01 17:32:27

“I’m relly not a speling nazi,”

Good thing you’re not.

 
Comment by takingbets
2008-02-01 18:32:31

LOL!! sorry about that, ive had a lisp most of my life!

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-01 18:38:33

Spike, that was supposed to be ironic - lol.

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-01 18:41:29

And as for you, Lad, that should be lots of people played fast and LOST,as in FBer. LOL.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by takingbets
2008-02-01 12:37:18

They’re Down, But Not All Out: Some Flippers Are Hanging On

Thursday January 31, 6:10 pm ET
Kathleen Doler

http://biz.yahoo.com/ibd/080131/realestate.html?.v=1

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-02 02:17:14

I think we need a whole new word for the intelligence level of flippers who buy from other flippers.

 
 
Comment by txchick57
2008-02-01 13:44:13

Bidding for some spring puts but will need one more push up to get ‘em. Otherwise, will do it Monday a.m.

Comment by txchick57
2008-02-01 13:52:49

got em. Unreal. What was it, two weeks ago that the world was coming to an end?

Comment by FB wants a do over
2008-02-01 13:59:11

Got some too.

 
Comment by Hoz
2008-02-01 14:29:14

Coming to an end! But they won’t say when.

Do you remember a few weeks ago when somebody posited that the market would hit 10,000 before 13,000 ? !3,000 is the next place I look to get short, then the world can end again for a few weeks. :>) And I can start all over.

(Dang I wish I understood the tech stocks, maybe some day I’ll try to learn. In the meantime I’ll keep sticking with things I understand. On Microsoft/Yahoo news there has to be divergence in the whole group and there should be a way to really profit. I’m just not comfortable with level 3 tech accounting.)

Comment by vozworth
2008-02-01 20:24:18

shoe shine boy momment was 12700.

get ready for the next leg down.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by vozworth
2008-02-01 20:01:48

if you’ve watched JDSU, JAVA, INTC, and CSCO.

you would understand why today was the sell of the long positions. Somewhere in there, the top came in on MSFT,APPL, and GOOG..

TECH TOP IS IN.

 
 
Comment by takingbets
2008-02-01 13:56:48

does anyone know whats up with the homebuilder stocks? they have been gaining all week? it dosent make any sence why anyone would want to buy into a sinking ship.

Comment by watcher
2008-02-01 14:17:23

Even a dead cat will bounce.

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-02-01 14:25:09

didn’t you get the memo? raising the conforming limits will get them all up off the mat.

Comment by takingbets
2008-02-01 14:31:52

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
 
Comment by Blano
2008-02-01 14:46:29

Cramer said buy, buy, buy……..whaddaya waiting for???

Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-01 20:02:05

You go first.

 
 
Comment by NYTickedOff
2008-02-01 21:50:18

Yea it really does’nt make much sence, but niether does bank of america stock going up a ton since buying CFC, I can see poeple looking at the 6 percent dividend, but how are they gonna pay that big of a dividend when CFC has a tons of bad loans that BAC is now taking on…They will have to cut the dividend like Citi at some point…The homebuilder keep puting out terible news, news that would sink all of them in a sane market, I gotta believe there is a PPT and it is pumping these stocks and retail stocks as they need the most help….

 
 
Comment by sm_landlord
2008-02-01 15:15:34

What have you done to my T-Bills, Ben?

http://www.chartoftheday.com/20080201.htm?T

 
Comment by Majisto
2008-02-01 15:34:10

This is for LongIslandLost, Danni, etc, the Lawn Guyland crew:

http://newyork.craigslist.org/lgi/rfs/556355229.html

“Instant equity!” :P

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-01 18:36:36

I like this one:

EIGHT ACRE lake with building spot. (970)434-7660, (970)216-6371.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-01 18:54:15

Ok as long as you can walk on water, I suppose.

 
 
Comment by neuromance
2008-02-01 21:36:05

Chris Dodd (D-Conn) proposing direct bailout: http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/31/real_estate/subprime_bailout_proposal/?postversion=2008013117

“Senator Chris Dodd, the committee chair, said he is working to create a Home Ownership Preservation Corporation, which would purchase mortgage securities that are backed by at-risk, subprime loans from lenders and investors…

Senator Chris Dodd, the committee chair, said he is working to create a Home Ownership Preservation Corporation, which would purchase mortgage securities that are backed by at-risk, subprime loans from lenders and investors…”

Buying junk bonds from bagholders, so they can still make a profit. That’s what I want to see my tax dollars go towards. Excellent idea Senator. Keep the market inflated, and bail out your big contributors.

Dodd’s contributors:
http://opensecrets.org/pacs/memberprofile.asp?CID=N00000581&Cycle=2008

Comment by CA renter
2008-02-02 06:06:50

Funny, I think this was predicted right here on the HBB a year or two ago…

A$$holes. (sorry)

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post

  • The Housing Bubble Blog