February 8, 2006

‘Sharp Drop’ In Massachusetts Home Prices Has Begun

The Metro West Daily News has this report on Massachusetts. “Housing prices are projected to drop 5 percent during each of the first two quarters of this year and Bay State residents remain highly concerned over the cost of housing, market analysts said yesterday.”

“A ’sharp’ drop in Massachusetts housing prices has begun, said Alan Clayton-Matthews, a professor at the McCormack Graduate School of Policy Studies at UMass. ‘The same economic forces that led to very high and fast-growing prices here in the past are now working in reverse,’ he said. ‘Housing prices are almost certainly going to decline in the near future.’”

“‘When we do have this housing price correction it is going to help our economy just as it did in the 1990s and is one of the requirements we need for the Massachusetts economy to grow again and expand robustly and for population growth to return,’ said Clayton-Matthews. ‘The longer we avoid a correction in housing prices, the sharper that correction will be and the more steep it will be.’”

“‘The level of concern over housing costs in both Massachusetts and in Essex County housing remains quite high,’ said Michael Goodman, director of economic and public policy at the UMass Donahue Institute, noting the public cares as much about housing as health care and public education. ‘It’s clear that housing costs, housing policy and housing development remain a very relevant issue in Massachusetts public policy circles.’”




RSS feed | Trackback URI

52 Comments »

Comment by david
2006-02-08 07:43:50

testing

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2006-02-08 07:46:02

Testing the edit function.

 
Comment by Pinch a Penny
2006-02-08 08:02:07

If house pricing is falling, what is the incentive for me to buy one???? Losing money??? It most certainly will be an interesting spring!:-)

 
Comment by Lou Minatti
2006-02-08 08:04:02

“When we do have this housing price correction it is going to help our economy just as it did in the 1990s”

I am glad this is finally being mentioned. I think this is accurate. RE prices continued to collapse even as the economy strengthened. Idiots got burned, but non-idiots had more income because they weren’t tossing it on the housing bubble bonfire. I think (hope?) there will be short-term pain for the current catastrophe, but an enormous long-term benefit.

Comment by katy
2006-02-08 08:07:21

…and hopefully we’ll stop losing the smart young people who had to move away from Boston to afford a place to live. I miss the interesting folk who have been replaced by yuppies here!

 
Comment by dennis
2006-02-08 11:04:37

We will actually have more disposable income on a month to month basis as it will not be locked up in mtg. payments.

 
 
Comment by Lou Minatti
2006-02-08 08:08:02

BTW, http://www.zillow.com/ is now up, but the servers are overwhelmed right now. Realtors(tm) accustomed to 6% commissions are sweating bullets over this.

Comment by mrincomestram
2006-02-08 10:02:06

Your giving this site way too much credit

 
Comment by Mo Money
2006-02-08 13:10:42

Thats a cool site, I wonder how accurate it is. I put in my address and I figure its about $25K higher than last resale in my complex.

Comment by GetStucco
2006-02-08 17:24:55

Given that ziprealty makes money selling homes, would it be whatever surprising if it turns out that zwillow has a very rosy bit of upward bias in their value estimates?

 
 
 
Comment by Pinch a Penny
2006-02-08 08:09:25

Once we start seeing stories in the MSM how RE is supposed to drop 10 % for the next 6 months, I think that the drop could be a little bit more precipitous than that. There is no incentive to purchase a declining asset. That removes a lot of people who could, but wont. I certainly will not buy anything this year, choosing instead to save my money, and pay off all debt.

 
Comment by housegeek
2006-02-08 08:12:54

Meanwhile, in NYC, the Daily News looks backward through rose-colored shades:

“What’s hot? All of Brooklyn is hot,” said Steve Spinola, Real Estate Board president, citing across-the-board increases in the value of apartments and one- and two-family homes.

The report also boasted the top prices fetched in two exclusive neighborhoods: The average DUMBO-Fulton Ferry apartment goes for $1.26 million, and family houses in Brooklyn Heights sell for an average of $2.7 million.

Many renters said they feared they could never afford to buy homes in Brooklyn - and expressed regret they hadn’t bought years ago.

“It’s not within reach,” said Deborah Stewart of downtown Brooklyn, who has wanted to buy for years but said, “It’s impossible at this point.”
….
Observers debate whether the prices of New York property will drop sharply or there will be a “soft landing” for real estate, but Spinola argued homes will just get pricier.

“I’m not sure it’ll be a landing, soft or otherwise,” Spinola said.

“I think it will be a continual increase, maybe not as dramatic as it has been. There just isn’t enough housing for everybody.”

http://www.nydailynews.com/02-08-2006/boroughs/story/389296p-330301c.html

It cracks me up that they counter “obvservers” — i.e. the Mayor, economists, actual data on home sales from late dec, reduced listings, with a quote from a guy called “Spinola”

But seriously, the Daily News reaches a working class audience who I hope is not fooled by this. Realtors have been very aggressive pushing risky mortgages onto folks who can’t afford them. It’s just plain irresponsible for the News to paint the market this way.

 
Comment by ockurt
2006-02-08 08:15:42

Can He Make Realtors Obsolete?

At Expedia, Richard Barton was the terror of travel agents. Now he’s putting real estate data online.

From the LA Times.

http://tinyurl.com/b6jt6

Comment by mrincomestram
2006-02-08 10:01:18

Don’t believe the hype. It’s all marketing spin. He’s offering nothing you can’t get yourself without a trip to the recorder’s office. He’s just makeing it more convient. The bottomline is he is just offering a new space for the real estate industry to advertise.

Comment by Pata Nahin
2006-02-09 21:44:59

Saving me a trip to the recorder’s office is invaluable.

 
 
 
Comment by KirkH
2006-02-08 08:21:10

Testing and suggestion, the name/logo at the top should link back to the homepage. The new site seems a lot faster.

Comment by freeloading roommate
2006-02-08 09:21:56

Agreed. I was just about to post the same thing… it’s useful for navigating between articles.

 
 
Comment by jayman
2006-02-08 08:29:59

“The longer we avoid a correction in housing prices, the sharper that correction will be and the more steep it will be”
This also applies the business cycle.The longer you avoid the downturn, the worse it is when it eventually comes.We won’t have to go to Glouchester to get the “Perfect Storm”
Looks like Essex county is the Eye of the Bubble!!

 
Comment by poguemahone
2006-02-08 08:34:23
 
Comment by bottomfisherman
2006-02-08 08:35:01

“‘When we do have this housing price correction it is going to help our economy just as it did in the 1990s and is one of the requirements we need for the Massachusetts economy to grow again and expand robustly and for population growth to return,’ said Clayton-Matthews. ‘The longer we avoid a correction in housing prices, the sharper that correction will be and the more steep it will be.’”

Wow! It’s nice to hear someone with some common sense. :-)

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2006-02-08 08:37:03

test

 
Comment by stanleyjohnson
2006-02-08 08:37:42

check this new Real Estate site

 
 
Comment by also renting in ma
2006-02-08 08:38:34

I read the full article and it’s all over the place. Hard to say what it is actually predicting and sound like a liberal pitch for more affordable housing.

I actually live in Essex County and here’s the facts. Prices are coming down- the stupidly priced pieces of cr*p are being re-priced and if they’re not they sit. However nice homes fairly priced (meaning still really high) are selling quickly and near asking.

Still no evidence of “bursting” as has been predicted for a year. Still just some hissing.

 
Comment by goleta
2006-02-08 08:39:01

10% drop in 6 months means $100K/year for a $500K home.

With that $100K saving, you can rent that home for at least 5 years. In 5 years, the price for that home will drop at least 50%. So the longer you rent, the more you save.

 
Comment by flat
2006-02-08 08:41:15

spoken by a man on the gov tit
recessions are a drag for the rest of us
“‘When we do have this housing price correction it is going to help our economy just as it did in the 1990s and is one of the requirements we need for the Massachusetts economy to grow again and expand robustly and for population growth to return,’ said Clayton-Matthews

 
Comment by Tom
2006-02-08 08:46:54

10% of 500k is actually 50k not 100k.

Comment by goleta
2006-02-08 08:50:13

10% drop in 6 month means 20% drop a year. So it’s $100K drop for a $500K home.

Comment by Tom
2006-02-08 09:36:45

That’s if you are assuming past performance is an indicator of future gains / loss.

This is if it stays on a linear path. Chances are it will either slow or accelerate. I think it will slow first AND then accelerate, but I see your logic. :)

 
 
 
Comment by flat
2006-02-08 08:48:41

15% drop = recession
25% drop = depression or more than 3 qtrs of neg growth
don’t worry the gov will print money like mad

Comment by Glenn
2006-02-08 09:49:52

And if the Fed prints money like mad the dollar will fall, faith in the Fed will decline and the risk-premium on long term dollar debt will rise.

Comment by Memphis
2006-02-08 11:55:18

And if the Fed prints money like mad the dollar will fall, faith in the Fed will decline and the risk-premium on long term dollar debt will rise.

And the elderly wil starve when a $500 check covers a few bags of groceries. Wage pressure being non-existant, there will be more defaults, more belt-tightening, more companies failing & unemployment will explode. That should fix the economy alrightee.

 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-02-08 17:29:17

Higher risk premiums, bye-bye conundrum.

 
 
 
Comment by goleta
2006-02-08 08:48:57

Home prices in MA need to fall at least 50% for businesses there to be competitive again. Most PhDs working for bio and info tech companies are not paid well enough to afford a median price home within 20 miles of those companies. The Fed has to make US companies competitive again and busting the housing bubble is one of the best things they can do.

 
Comment by Mole Man
2006-02-08 08:53:06

It is interesting to think of how this might change the This Old House show. Maybe in the future they will rip out overdone kitchens and granite counters and replace them with multiple units with IKEA style spec kitchenettes, or gut condotel units to create spaces large enough for humans, possibly even whole families, to live in.

 
Comment by asgardragnarok
2006-02-08 08:53:21

On the radio this morning I was listening to a piece about how Massachusetts has had one of the slowest economic recoveries from after the 9/11, Enron, Tech Bubble implosion. They often cite housing prices and slow job creation as the two major factors in why Massachusetts has not been able to recover faster. They also spoke about some major companies, like Fidelity, moving out of Boston. The home prices are crushing the life out of any economic recovery in this state because it is sending the young people heading for the hills.
Mayor of Boston, Tom (mummbles) Menino is trying to get an economic stimulus package going that relies more on new construction and job growth and the revenue that it generates from new taxes. There has been criticism that the city of Boston relies too heavily on property taxes to bolster the cities coffers. When there is a downturn in the prices and the property taxes drop.

Comment by Spunkmeyer
2006-02-08 09:31:11

Would property taxes drop, though? In my area, the taxed value is phased in and reassessed every few years. I think a lot of people will be shocked at how much their property taxes will be going up in the next year due to the increases of the last few years.

 
 
Comment by KirkH
2006-02-08 09:00:46

The NYTimes has an article on Zillow:

Two real estate Web sites are starting to offer services that could change the way real estate is bought and sold online.

One site, Zillow.com, which will be introduced today, will help consumers obtain more accurate real estate sales information — to the consternation of some real estate agents.

A smaller site, Redfin.com, introduced an unusual new service last week that might be even more disruptive to the real estate industry: the feature automates the process of bidding on a house online.

Zillow is attracting a lot of attention because it obtained $32 million in venture capital financing and its chief executive, Rich Barton, was a creator of Expedia, the online travel agency.

The new site provides data like previous sales prices and the prices of similar properties on 60 million residential properties, information that real estate agents do not display in the public multiple listing service. The site also includes price appreciation (or depreciation) data in a form that resembles stock charts. “It’s a lot of data to make you smarter,” Mr. Barton said.

In addition, Zillow uses software to offer a free home-value estimator. The “Zestimate” service tries to do what has been a primary function of the real estate agent. And in contrast to many other real estate Web sites, like Realtor.com, run by the National Association of Realtors, or Home Pages.com, owned by Housevalues Inc., Zillow does not try to connect its users with agents.

Many real estate agents worry that Zillow could be a first step in an online evolution that could threaten their $60 billion commission-based business, just as Expedia, Travelocity and other online sites disrupted the business of travel agents.

Mr. Barton said it was not his intent to take part of the agent’s commission,

This is a lot like the Newspaper business who are furious that classifieds are now free. Commission avoidance schemes are spreading and it’s a good thing.

Comment by feepness
2006-02-08 10:52:53

The site also includes price appreciation (or depreciation) data in a form that resembles stock charts.

Real Estate ONLY appreciates. What good is a chart?

 
 
Comment by craven_moorehead
2006-02-08 09:08:01

test

 
Comment by craven_moorehead
2006-02-08 09:14:55

A smaller site, Redfin.com, introduced an unusual new service last week that might be even more disruptive to the real estate industry: the feature automates the process of bidding on a house online.

Redfin.com? What the…? Wasn’t “lowball.com” available??

 
Comment by also renting in ma
2006-02-08 09:28:33

I think the MA economy is misunderstood and not well represented by statistics. Somehow a lot of people seem to do okay out here, but almost everyone you talk to thinks things are not going that well.

If you don’t own a home already it’s a stretch to buy one. If you do own a home, then you’ve probably got some equity to make a down payment on another to get the mortgage.

If you have a good job and have held it for a while, it probably pays pretty well because salaries went up for a long period. If you don’t have a good job, unlikely that it will be easy to find one.

So net/net, it’s kind of like the country as a whole- if you’re well situated you’re happy, if you’re not its tough to change.

I have been both dislocated from my job and my marriage in the last few years so I see both sides. I am the exception in that I have come out okay.

If you talk to someone in MA however who has not come out okay, they tend to blame the place for not being able to afford a home or find a good job. They might be right.

Comment by AL
2006-02-08 16:05:11

I lived in MA and had a good job, 75K per year, had 3 properties 2 that were investments, two of the properites purchased in 00 and the other in 94.
I was doing very well for a single guy, however by the time i sold all 3 properties last year, i was still doing well,the cost of keeping all the properties running, maint. util. taxes etc., had gone up just about double in 4 years , not the base mortgage tho since i always staryed with fixed rates, and made it just not worth all the aggravation anymore as well it made no sense of the value of these properties was so high. It was easy to sell and run from MA.
ohh and don’t get me talking about auto excise tax,, lol
happy renting in sunny FLA. with $$$$ in the bank..
—AL

 
 
Comment by longbeachca
2006-02-08 09:48:02

The psychology that pushed the price up was “get in before being priced out”. Now the tempermant is “don’t catch the falling knife”. Buyers, the remaining prudent ones, will wait until the excesses are removed. The activities will be mostly adjustments from adjustable to fixed loans for whoever can afford it. Speculators, naive buyers, unqualified homeowners, etc. will look for any exit or be forced out of the markets. The situation will be that of little demand and ample supply (lots of motivated sellers), which will drop or, in industry terminology, re-equilibrate the price to fundamentals. Home price will head south with the same velocity as when it rose.

Comment by Glenn
2006-02-08 10:10:35

Judging from people around me, there are still a lot of suckers out there.

Economists, journalists, builders, speculators, realtors, and “average” home-buyers each form a community of sorts. And each community has a slightly different point at which the accepted wisdom shifts. Which is to say, I think multiple “tipping points” can occur. And, critically, I don’t think the average home-buyer has abandoned the “get in before being priced out” mantra. Yes, popular opinion is shifting from the extreme frenzy…but it hasn’t “tipped.” I have no doubt it will “tip”, but the timing and extent of the “anti-bubble” are as predictable as the run-up…(i.e., not very).

 
 
Comment by skeptic
2006-02-08 10:13:02

I agree that a price drop is Mass will be good for the local economy.

As a personal example, I was recently choosing between job offers in Boston and NYC, and I ultimately chose NY because it seems to me that Boston is just about as expensive as NY at this point, but there’s a lot less opportunity.

I like Boston a lot and actually prefer it to NY. House prices were a big piece of the puzzle for me, and if Boston prices were 20% below that of NY (where they probably should be), I might have chosen differently.

 
Comment by Peter
2006-02-08 11:13:47

For all of the Boston areas high real estate prices- the economy in the area and all of New England has not had an ‘economic recovery’ based on real estate - whichhas not been any kind of economic driver. In fact RE has had a negative on generating new jobs in the Boston region and throughout New England for ‘new jobs’.
In Connecticut RE has not had any kind of positive on job growth-despite healthy gains in prices. In the regions of the country which have had the fastest growth in this ‘recovery’ Real estate employment has been the main engine for job growth- therefore when these ‘hot’ areas slow- what will happen? You do not need the gift of a genius to figure this out.

 
Comment by renterma
2006-02-08 12:05:29

As housing remains unaffordable for most of the young people, they will be forced to leave the state. The changes in demographics will hurt the economy. There can’t be much economic growth unless you have the young workers thriving in this state. This will automatically reduce demand for houses. With economic stagnation, the towns will be forced to either cut back on the civic services or charge more taxes and fees both of which will further hurt the house prices. I pity the citizens who have courted house arrest by buying in this state in the last couple of years.

At present, the average home prices in MA have not budged much from their fall 2005 levels. I do hope that sanity will have upper hand during 2006. In the mean time, I will continue to rent and watch my savings expand each month.

Comment by Pinch a Penny
2006-02-08 12:48:32

I agree, but MA has an abundance of universities and colleges that attract people from all over the country. When there are good paying jobs or the economy is good for start ups here, then they will stay. Right now, there are few new jobs, and those jobs that are here have dissapointing wages.
Wages in MA have been stagnant, but I think that the reality is that wages have gone way down. I do not seem to see the same level of high paying jobs that I used to see.
MA OTOH has little exposure to the kind of greed that we have heard of in the OC with the major subprime lenders. If ameriquest ceases to exist, it will do little to no harm to the MA economy.

 
 
Comment by GetStucco
2006-02-08 17:26:14

“Housing prices are projected to drop 5 percent during each of the first two quarters of this year and Bay State residents remain highly concerned over the cost of housing, market analysts said yesterday.”

I wonder how long it will take the oblivious bulls in the Harvard housing finance program to note and acknowledge that prices are dropping like a rock?

 
Comment by Chip
2006-02-08 19:16:29

Goleta said, “10% drop in 6 months means $100K/year for a $500K home. With that $100K saving, you can rent that home for at least 5 years. In 5 years, the price for that home will drop at least 50%. So the longer you rent, the more you save.”

I like that logic. Hardly anyone is predicting that rents will rise anytime soon, so why buy anytime soon?

I notice that we haven’t heard from one of our bulls, HomeownerMA, in a long time. Perhaps he’s making s much money in the Boston market that it’s eating up all his time.

Comment by dimitris
2006-02-08 21:03:58

“10% drop in 6 months means $100K/year for a $500K home. With that $100K saving, you can rent that home for at least 5 years”

I agree with the concept but not the math. To rent a 500k home, you’d need bare minimum of 2500.00 * 5 years = 150,000.
More realistic rent would be 100,000/2800.00= 2.9 years. I’ve already seen price drops around here in MA and I think I’m going to throw in the towel soon. I’m not looking for rock bottom prices but I think prices are now much better than they were last year (at least South Shore, MA). The data doesn’t show it yet but I can see price drops everywhere. You can at least negotiate now. Also, the interest rates can become much higher next year and unless you have a bag of cash or a real doomsday view over the next few years then you can probably afford to wait. I’ve seen a house where they were asking 709,000 last year this time and know they have dropped to 634,000. That’s already a 10 percent drop!
I know a lot users here are predicting 30 percent drops, I just can’t see this house dropping to 498,000 from 709,000. So, if I buy it around 600k (15 percent drop) then I get to live in a house I own and can still come close to the 100k savings you spoke of earlier. Don’t forget people, renting isn’t free either. Oh and by the way, I intend to live in this house for a long time.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post