February 2, 2008

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For February 2, 2008

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

260 Comments »

Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-02 04:08:35


$3-4Tr. Of Americans’ Phony Wealth Evaporated In the First Three Months of the Recession

First a definitive piece of “news” – the recession in the US began in November of 2007. I have multiple confirmations on this and it will be confirmed by NBER in due course.

The phony wealth in question is due to Asset Inflation, from inflation of the Scam Market and the housing prices. The drop in the Scam Market value during Nov’07-Jan’08 is slightly north of $2Tr and drop in home values is north of $1Tr. as per my best estimate.

This drop of phony wealth during the 3-month period represents more than 20% of the annual GDP, or more like drop of 90% of the GDP annual rate. This has not happened since the Great Depression.

Jas

Comment by Ben Jones
2008-02-02 04:39:50

It’s too early for that crap

Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-02 05:08:14


Could you please elaborate, Ben?

Jas

Comment by Blackbox
2008-02-02 05:55:05

Yep, I am convinced that if the Great Depression had never happened these turkeys would be comparing today with the Dark Ages! Its amazing how some people just cannot get off the depression angle! Things will be tough, but they are never as good and never as bad. Dollar cost average into the market, and you will end up way ahead 10 to 20 years from now. Buy a little gold as a hedge, but don’t put more then 5 to 10% of your portfolio in it. At one point, homebuilders and banks will be a screaming buy, and you will make a ton of money off the buy. I do think however that home prices in the super heated markets will drop 40% from peak, and condos 40-60% from peak, when accounting for inflation. So there is going to be plenty of hurt left for many, unfortunately even for those who did not participate in this housing bubble in the first place. Get off this depression stuff already!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 06:48:46

“At one point, homebuilders and banks will be a screaming buy, and you will make a ton of money off the buy.”

Be sure to come back and tell us exactly when we have reached that point. And before then, tell us which of these firms are going to go bankrupt so we can avoid throwing good money after bad.

 
Comment by WAman
2008-02-02 06:50:19

Yes buy the homebuilders and remember when they file for chapter 11 stockholders get $0.00 per share.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 06:50:36

Please come back and tell us when the housing bust has bottomed out so we can all profit wildly by snapping up shares of whatever banks and builders are left standing. And for the mean time, it would be helpful if you could tell us which builders and banks will go bankrupt over the next few years so we can avoid throwing good money into the toilet right before it flushes.

 
Comment by crispy&cole
2008-02-02 07:21:41

Prior to this boom most HB stocks did nothing for 12 years plus

 
Comment by GH
2008-02-02 08:35:11

The reason we use historical events to look at possible future ones is that it is the best model we have. Will it be the same this time? No of course not. Circumstances are far different today in many ways. Some better, some worse.

What is real is that we live in a world awash with debt, much of which will never be repaid, and incomes which have flattened out or even dropped over time and super high commodity inflation.

I hear a lot of complaining (self included) about how bad it is, and hear how we need to double taxes to pay the deficit and raise interest rates through the ceiling etc, which sounds like AARP talking, but at 56% (30% fed, 15.1% ssi, and 11% state in CA) on my highest income I already feel over taxed, and don’t bother working overtime since it is not worth the trouble for an extra couple of percent gain on a take home check, so I doubt higher taxes will solve our problems. Then what?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 08:43:02

Sounds like Blackbox has a few homebuilder stock shares he needs to dump…

 
Comment by Blackbox
2008-02-02 09:12:11

Nope, I have not bought any homebuilders yet. What, are you nuts? There is still plenty of time to wait to pull the trigger on homebuilders. Banks will be sooner, but still a year or two away. I bought oil drillers when oil was going for around $10 a barrel a while back and made a killing. Smart investors go against the herd, just like many in this blog didn’t buy a home or condo when everyone thought it was a no-brainer. You buy when it makes sense, and especially when everyone thinks it is the stupidest thing to do so.

 
Comment by edhopper
2008-02-02 09:31:09

Gotta go with Blackbox here. The responses are way to reactionary. He did not pull a “Cramer” and say HBs and Banks were a good buy now. He said they will be a good buy when this crap is sorted through. Just as houses will fall below their fair value (as bubble burst always do). So too will stocks like HBs and Banks fall to good valuations. At some point in the next year we will have a pretty good idea how bad the big shitpile has hit the banks. When their stocks fall far enough and there are no more big surprises, it will be a good time to buy. Just like it was a great time to buy after the S&L crises.
So put away the knives and realize when some one says something reasonable.

 
Comment by Bill In Maryland
2008-02-02 10:33:33

I agree with you Blackbox. The next few years will be dark, leftist drab gray economics, but in the long haul, Americans will be forced to be responsible for more and more of their retirement, health care, preventive health, etc. I’m at 8.8% of my net worth into precious metals and will probably up it to 12%, but that’s it.

As for real estate, I am going to travel down to Central America near the end of this year and look into renting an apartment, get dual citizenship, and protect some of my wealth. But I will not give up on USA in the long term. We will have more economic freedom in the long term as we’ll come back to our senses England was a huge empire, but look - it did not die. It came back from drab gray socialism when Maggie Thatcher took control of the government. But the next 5 or 10 years will be our (USA;s) dark ages, i’m afraid.

 
Comment by CA renter
2008-02-02 16:00:15

If socialism is the opposite of what we got with Reagan and Bush (credit-bubble, supply-side, wealth-disparity horse$hit), then I am looking forward to it, comrade. ;)

 
 
 
Comment by mgnyc
2008-02-02 05:50:19

hey ben sounds like Michelle Mlakin of the ny post has been lurking here

http://www.nypost.com/seven/02022008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/the_subprime_whiners_953585.htm

Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-02 06:04:17


She once said that Republicans like illegal immigrants for cheap labor and Democrats like them for cheap votes.

Jas

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-02 07:11:30

Don’t they?

 
Comment by exeter
2008-02-02 07:56:37

Jas I’d like to see proof of that statement. I don’t doubt you but this broad M. Malkin has never been right about anything. Listening to her yammering is in fact down right disturbing.

 
Comment by Incredulous
2008-02-02 07:57:37

I think I said the same thing on this blog two or more years ago. When I said it on Ann Coulter’s blog (along with some other unkind about Dick[head] Cheney and his canned hunts), I was banned, which I consider a badge of honor. Both parties exploit illegal immigrants for their own gain, and Republican John McCain has certainly benefited from the “Hispanic” vote in Florida, which I’m sure is just an unforeseen coincidence . . . .:)

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-02-02 09:19:27

“When I said it on Ann Coulter’s blog (along with some other unkind about Dick[head] Cheney and his canned hunts), I was banned, which I consider a badge of honor.”

Incredulous, you’re my hero.

 
Comment by NotInMontana
2008-02-02 09:34:48

and that’s why a lot of us GOPers hate him, and now we’re being castigated for not just falling in behind McCain like good “moderates.” Some of this crap is hard to ignore.

 
Comment by Incredulous
2008-02-02 09:58:36

Thank you CarrieAnne (unless you’re being sarcastic). I doubt Ann Coulter ever saw my comments; her blog is run by arrogant sycophants who sent me an e-mail saying simply, “You are banned.” One of them was also doing stand-in “moderating” for another blog I posted on, and s/he deleted my postings, but I re-posted during a different shift and alerted the readers to what was going on. Little human beings with delusions of self-importance can be very annoying.

By the way, I’m sorry for my careless typing in the above post; the word “things” should have followed “unkind.” In case this posting has any flubs, I apologize for them too.

 
 
Comment by Incredulous
2008-02-02 06:34:32

Good editorial. Malkin and Glenn Beck, both denounced as right-wing fascists by some (not all) liberals, have been blasting bubble-blowers and bailout-promoters for some time now, with no mercy for Bush or any other Republicans involved. On the other hand, Lou Dobbs, also denounced as right-wing, refers to most of the FBs going into foreclosure as “victims” of a Bush “war on the middle class.”

Meanwhile preposed bailouts (i.e., vote-buying schemes) get bigger and bigger.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Lip
2008-02-02 06:58:15

Lou Dobs thought to be right wing? By who, Move On.com? IMO you have to go wayyyy over to the left to consider him right wing.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-02-02 08:40:09

Lou Dobbs Refuses to talk about how CNN busted its unions after 9/11….Outsoucing and then paying about 1/3 less with no benefits.

Then turning around and hiring Low cost newbie reporters & technicians from Oskosh… No wonder ratings went down a lot.

Its still on I will be spinning Mardi Gras Zydeco rock and blues for Fat Tuesday 5th staring at 6pm at Obivia’s 201 Lafayette st soho, 1 block south of spring st, on the 6…come on by…happy hour till 8 some great light food…

 
Comment by Chip
2008-02-02 10:20:00

If all of the FBs, who might be able to convince the authorities that they are the principal residence of the property they bought, are presumed innocent, then someone must be guilty. But I see no corresponding call to punish the guilty.

Put another way, doing nothing would punish the homoaners who gambled and lost. But Congress seems intent on restoring their virginity. Yet they do not propose any sort of punishment for those who took advantage of the homoaners. Why would anyone outside the U.S. ever again want to invest in our bonds, if this is how such enormous failures are effectively ignored? Not to mention our newly-discovered interest in unilaterally modifying existing contracts.

 
Comment by Chip
2008-02-02 10:21:22

residents

 
Comment by skip
2008-02-02 10:44:12

Lou Dobbs Refuses to talk about how CNN busted its unions after 9/11….Outsoucing and then paying about 1/3 less with no benefits.

I don’t think Lou was working at CNN at the time. He jumped ship to some dotcom in the late 90’s. Maybe he had to take a pay cut to come back as well??

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-02-02 11:07:58

‘Meanwhile preposed bailouts (i.e., vote-buying schemes) get bigger and bigger.’

The proposals keep getting bigger and bigger, yes…but I’m still not seeing any real bailouts. They somehow don’t seem to be actually, you know–working.

 
 
Comment by Lip
2008-02-02 06:40:07

Beauty with Brains

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by wmbz
2008-02-02 07:07:48

“The stigma of default is gone”.

That to me is one of the major faults with our ‘new’ society. The everyone is a winner BS.The no need to keep score crowd that has weaseled it’s way into the teaching system. Hello socialism!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by flatffplan
2008-02-02 07:40:18

everyone gets a participant trophy

 
 
Comment by spike66
2008-02-02 08:09:57

I am stunned to find out that on this issue, I agree with Malkin, word for word.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Rancher
2008-02-02 08:57:34

I totally agree.

 
Comment by CrackerJim
2008-02-02 09:12:39

Me too!

 
Comment by Nomansland
2008-02-02 11:27:04

An ah hah! moment! Yes, very good. :)

 
 
 
 
Comment by Michael Fink
2008-02-02 05:12:48

Jas,

In percentage terms; I don’t think that the stock market is nearly as overheated as the housing market. Would you agree with that or not?

The stock market reacts very quickly to new information, and, frankly, I just don’t see it taking another huge leg down anytime soon. I think we are going to hover in the 11-13K range for possibly, quite a long time (while the housing market implodes and the debt market cracks up behind it), but, frankly, I don’t see us breaking down below 10K again in this down cycle.

The stock market is already 20% off it’s top, housing, even in the most overheated areas, is still not down much more then that, and, imho, has a lot further to fall! I just wonder if you think that stocks are also headed much lower (in aggregate, certainly some are heading for 0 as this whole thing continues to unwind)?

And yes, it is way too early for this crap, thank you for pointing that out Ben! :)

Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-02 06:12:02


“In percentage terms; I don’t think that the stock market is nearly as overheated as the housing market. Would you agree with that or not?”

No, I don’t agree. Have you noticed the yield on S&P500?

And why the important information on the decline of household wealth crap? It only happened once since the GD and that was in 2001-02, but it was nothing compared to what is happening now. The annual rate of decline, for the past three months, is close to 90% of the GDP. That is crap or unimportant?

Jas

Comment by lars39
2008-02-02 07:14:23

And your solution is?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-02 08:02:14


“And your solution is?”

Am I here to provide solutions? Isn’t information in itself useful? I detest this attitude among some that if someone points out, or talks about, a problem he, or she, should also provide a solution. Sorry.

Jas

 
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2008-02-02 09:09:22

My personal solution is mortgage rates starting at 14% + ;-)

 
Comment by Chip
2008-02-02 10:31:12

Hwy50 - I wonder if we might well be headed in that direction - at least toward 9-10% in any event. Presumably the disconnect between falling Fed funds rates and rising mortgage rates is logical enough - mortgages now represent a large leap in risk for investors from what was perceived just a year ago and nothing is going to fix that. Even if people like Dodd con Congress into agreeing that Fannie and Freddie can buy more and bigger mortgages, I wouldn’t think they can buy them all. Further, not even Fannie and Freddie seem inclined to go along with the zero-down loans that typified the bubble. So for the buyers who do not have enough skin to play in the game by normal rules, I’d think there must be a risk premium in the form of a higher aggregate interest rate.

Fortunately, that would seem to auger reasonably well for me relative to the rates on my humble FDIC-backed CDs.

 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-02-02 07:56:09

“I think we are going to hover in the 11-13K range for possibly, quite a long time (while the housing market implodes and the debt market cracks up behind it), but, frankly, I don’t see us breaking down below 10K again in this down cycle.”

I’ve heard this sentiment a few times here and wondered if anyone had the time and inclination to explain how there is a floor under the 10k. I’m not arguing; I’m just a market newbie. I don’t understand how floors and ceilings are perceived or why the market honors them? Is it groupthink? Or is it real value? (Thanks in advance for patience/time).

Comment by WAman
2008-02-02 09:11:52

I don’t know a lot about market technicals but I heard all of this before. Back in 2001 you would have heard “Oh the Nasdaq will never fall below 4000″. SUNW (now java) was over $250 in 2001. Now its $17.49. I could quote many such examples, but this one came to mind because of margin calls I got back then.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Remain calm. All's well
2008-02-02 10:38:04

CarriAnn:

Stocks are HIGHLY overvalued even on a most recent P/E basis. We are now on the downsloping side of the earnings cycle and given the amount of debt imploding, consumer cutbacks (shrinking MEW etc) the earnings in future are going to shrink a LOT (already happening with retailers, financials). The market is headed towards high single digits P/E ratios. CNBC can boost it all they want, there is no escaping that market valuations are in fantasyland.

I would not put a floor ANYWHERE on the DJIA. Ben & others may have trouble dealing with gloomy prognostications of Jas Jain and others, I can’t dismiss him so easily. Heck, two years ago a lot of people *on this blog* had trouble believing prices will fall by 30% in bubble markets but now even Goldman Sachs is predicting that!

So, to put it briefly, we are in uncharted territory. Debt collapse is happening at an amazing scale, and earnings are headed down, way down. You decide where the P in P/E should be compared with current levels

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-02-02 05:25:29

define recession.

Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-02 06:27:38


I leave that to NBER (National Bureau of Economic Research); they date the recessions in the US. You may want to visit their website and get the definition/description. I have read it couple of times.

Jas

Comment by Blue Skye
2008-02-02 08:18:14

I meant; please explain what you mean when you say “recession”. To me, there is a disconnect in your post. You say home equity went down, fine that is obvious. You say the stock market went down, fine we saw that too. It is the claim that this proves that we were in a “recession” that I cannot follow. If a “recession” is defined as negative growth of Gov’t posted GDP, then falling asset prices do not prove we were in one, especially not when the Official GDP growth numbers have been released as positive.

If you want to take an inflation adjusted spin on the GDP numbers, then a claim that we were already in a recession might be interesting, but proved by a drop in the stock market.

Used to be a big drop in the stock market was thought to forecast a looming recession, not marked the beginning of one. That’s why I wondered what you meant by “recession”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2008-02-02 16:15:46

I personally define a recession as lower wages, fewer jobs and a declining standard of living. It’s not “official” but by my standard, a recession was obvious last year in San Diego County.

I agree with Jas. One of the reasons I pointed out the reduction in wages for “safe” professions is because it is usually only done when things are REALLY BAD.

IOW, things are REALLY BAD, but the PTB are trying to cover it up. If you doubt the dire situation in our economy, why the 75 bps “emergency cut” right before the “planned” 50 bps the next week. Also consider the frantic talk about “bailouts — NOW” you hear in D.C. They aren’t doing that because they feel happy about things.

The sheeple are still grazing, for the most part. Some are beginning to look around.

What we are about to experience is BIG, IMHO.

 
 
 
Comment by rms
2008-02-02 09:46:10

“define recession.”

A 17″ monitor, 256mb ram and 9gb hard disk? :)

Comment by GH
2008-02-02 10:41:39

That would send me into a deep “depression” ):

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 06:11:11

“…slightly north of $2Tr and drop in home values is north of $1Tr. as per my best estimate…”

Those are the first estimates I have ever seen that were rounded to $1T with percentage errors of 25 pct or more (0.5/2*100 = 25 pct error bound, 0.5/1*100 = 50 pct error bound). I suggest you sharpen your pencil before updating them. Also bring data next time so we can be assured they are not biased (I generously assumed they were not in my error calculations).

Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-02 06:20:05


Hello Prof,

I said that combined they are $3-4Tr. The home price data for January is not out, so I am making an assumption. Scam Market loss was just north of $2Tr (is it important if it is $2.05Tr?). If I had exact numbers I would have not used a range. But, I am quite comfortable with the range being correct. Case-Shiller for Dec and Jan wouldn’t be out for 8 weeks. The housing wealth decline for Nov-Jan is expected to be above $1Tr and I don’t expect it to be above $1.5Tr. I hope that this explanation is adequate.

Jas

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 06:56:53

I am always uncomfortable when posters start throwing around huge scary numbers with no data nor calculations to support them. Just my personal preferences here…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-02 08:15:43


What do you mean by no data? I do have data on the Scam Market. You can’t figure out that the Scam Market value lost was $2Tr from Oct’07 to Jan’08 based on 11.2% decline in S&p500 and lot more in techs and small caps?

Do you have problem with the estimate of $1Tr+ decline in the value of RRE From Oct’07 to Jan’08? It is roughly 4% decline in price. Is that too much?

Am I off in my calculation/estimate, or assumption about the RRE decline?

Jas

 
Comment by GH
2008-02-02 08:19:38

I agree the numbers are phantom, but without numbers, we gained several trillion in asset appreciation over the past 7 years and chances are good those gains will be lost. On the surface this si a zero sum gain, but the wealth effect caused millions to lend and borrow real money based on this illusion of wealth and as a result we are in a lot of trouble today.

BTW, if I loan $100 that is $100 in real hard currency I am out of pocket. When banks do it there seems to be no hard currency behind the loans. Obviously if we are trillions in debt and there never was trillions in dollars???

 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-02 08:24:09


“I agree the numbers are phantom”

Yeah, as if you have a clue.

Jas

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 08:44:56

Phantom numbers are a major problem currently haunting the 21st century global economic order…

 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-02 09:18:02


This is ridiculous to accuse someone of “phantom numbers” when the bulk of the number IS available — the Scam Market decline was $2.0Tr if one truncates to the first decimal. Is the second decimal important?

Get a life, folks, rather than accusing without basis. I have already said that I had to make an assumption in the case of RRE.

Discredit if you don’t like the number?

Jas

 
Comment by GH
2008-02-02 10:38:29

Jas, no one is saying your numbers or more importantly reasoning are bad. For all I know you may be right to the dollar, although I took these as guesstimates, hence my observation of phantom numbers translates to my feeling these are an estimate, with no intent of discrediting what-so-ever. I doubt it even matters if the real number is 1.5 trillion or 3.5 trillion, that will not be fully known until we hit the bottom.

Point is your basic jist of phantom market loss is right on, and amplified by the fact that this phantom wealth is the collateral for real debt. That is the problem we face today.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 15:10:38

Jas –

You have a “boy who cried wolf” issue. It is hard to avoid noticing how you crow over each new shard of evidence that supports your “Greatest Depression” thesis. Reading these posts gets beyond tiresome after a point.

P.S. The U.S. stock market had a fantastic day Friday, didn’t it?

 
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-02-02 08:43:35

I actually AGREE with Jas:

It seems like Sept Oct…people just stopped answering resumes, or returning phone calls, and refusing to return receipts on emails….and even my dj bookings went down ..like other people said hit the wall or fell off the cliff…..

Comment by Blackbox
2008-02-02 11:28:29

I had a huge october in sales. Probably my best month in two years. Maybe your just terrible at your job. During good times, people that are terrible at their jobs become exposed!
The who is wearing swim trunks when the tide pulls out analogy. By the way, my Jan was great too.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 08:46:35

January 29, 2008

Recession’s bright side? Bargains for brave consumers
Let’s say you have some cash on hand, your job (or other source of income) is secure, and you love a good bargain. What opportunities might a recession bring?

First a disclaimer: Nobody, including us, (Not even Jas???) knows what’s ahead for this economy or, indeed, precisely what’s happening now. (Recessions are officially determined after the fact by the National Bureau of Economic Research.)

http://blogs.consumerreports.org/money/2008/01/recession_barga.html

Comment by REhobbyist
2008-02-02 16:48:16

Exactly, PBear. The recession that began in March 2001 was not called until 8 months later. I have little doubt listening to even bullish economists talk that we are in a recession that will be revealed in summer, 2008. Depression, I hope not, but feel more dread than I did in 2001-2. Maybe I’ve just been reading Jas’s posts too often!

 
 
Comment by oc-ed
2008-02-02 09:33:29

From John Mauldin on Recession …

http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/gateway.asp

Comment by Shake
2008-02-02 18:52:56

This one is a gem. Everyone should take a few minutes to read it. I believe his forecast will be dead on.

 
 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2008-02-02 04:44:45

Here is what a troll tried to post yesterday:

‘“Chatham said that investors are also buying blocks of homes and renting them out temporarily before ‘a turnaround’ and higher property values.”

‘I know these investors. They are my people. Being auto mechanics was kind of hardwork and boring, so we got into real estate in 2002. This is just a small blip. Prices will start soaring again in April, and we will all be rich. We learned everything we needed about real estate from an internet college. We didn’t need to waste our time and money going to college. You people will be fixing our cars soon, and we will laugh at you while counting our huge stacks of cash. ‘

BTW, Jimmy was posting from Colorado, so I kind of doubt ‘his people’ are buying bulk new houses in California. And if I work on his car, it won’t run anymore.

Don’t quit the lube shop job Jimmy!

Comment by combotechie
2008-02-02 05:04:08

This is where the knifecatching money will come from that will be fed into the system and will help keep it from freezing up.
These people are our friends.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 15:19:26

I agree. With no price discovery, there can be no comps, no market liquidity, and no normal used home market equilibrium adjustment back to affordable price levels.

The one reason I hesitate to argue this point too strongly is that I attended an excellent presentation a few nights ago on the topic of Southern Californian geology. The presenter showed evidence that it is possible to have a landslide with no liquidity — a self-liquidating dry slide where the moving mass of earth itself behaves as a liquid with no recent rainfall nor groundwater to serve as a lubricant. I suspect if the hidden inventory of vacant homes builds up to sufficient depth (esp. in the form of foreclosed REO that banks have no use for), something analogous might happen in the form of foreclosure auctions with a massive vertical drop in prices before equilibrium is restored.

Just a hunch here…

Comment by Magic Kat
2008-02-02 17:11:40

Crystal ball says Jimmy is a 25 year old wannabe, living in his parent’s basement, with 17K in cc bills, and is bringing his cousin as his “date” to a big superbowl party tomorrow. Oh Ben, let him dream… BTW, are you fighting a cold? Vitamin C, rest, and pleasure will cure you.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Michael Fink
2008-02-02 05:08:11

Good thing you didn’t let us have at that post Ben! It would have derailed the entire thread, but poor Jimmy would have questioned his meaning for living at the end of the flaming that he would have received for posting such BS here. :)

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-02 05:43:45

Just like indigenous peoples of many islands in the South Pacific, that lived simple lives until World War 2 came along, when suddenly the consumer might of the USA was thrust upon them and they had access to more wealth than they could ever imagine, until it suddenly went away and didn’t come back…

Everybody involved in real estate in any capacity, is very much in the same boat. They’ll say and do anything to keep hope alive.

“Famous examples of cargo cult activity include the setting up of mock airstrips, airports, offices, dining rooms, as well as the fetishization and attempted construction of western goods, such as radios made of coconuts and straw. Believers may stage “drills” and “marches” with sticks for rifles and use military-style insignia and “USA” painted on their bodies to make them look like soldiers, thereby treating the activities of western military personnel as rituals to be performed for the purpose of attracting the cargo. The cult members built these items and ‘facilities’ in the belief that the structures would attract cargo intended to be sent to them.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult

 
Comment by cynicalgirl
2008-02-02 05:45:23

That *has* to be a joke.

Comment by combotechie
2008-02-02 06:10:11

No more of a joke than those who built thousands of McMansions in vast stretches of nowhere with the idea that such structures would somehow attract thousands of people to come and live in them.

Comment by combotechie
2008-02-02 09:16:46

Or no more of a joke than burying a statue of Saint Joseph upside-down in your yard to attract a buyer for your house.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Rickoshay100
2008-02-02 09:48:28

If you build it, they will come”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by ACH
2008-02-02 07:47:59

Hmm, I’m not “sarcasm challenged”. That is what post this is: sarcasm and rather poor sarcasm at that. Still, I enjoy sarcasm even if it is somewhat amateurish.
Now for breakfast. Yummers! Cold pizza.
Roidy

Comment by Remain calm. All's well
2008-02-02 11:05:55

I agree. The sarcasm in Jimmy’s words is obvious to me.

 
 
Comment by exeter
2008-02-02 08:02:39

Hey JiffyLubeBoy…. Market cycles and economics can’t be explained in a paragraph like muffler bearings. You’re getting your PhD in reality and you don’t even know it….. yet.

 
Comment by Rich
2008-02-02 08:04:53

You people will be fixing our cars soon, and we will laugh at you while counting our huge stacks of cash.

I met a guy who owned a import auto repair shop a few years ago. He said people would just bitch and have a cow about the bill on the MB or BMW or any $$ car after he fixed it. So what he would do was add a extra 10% on top of the bill then when they started to cry he would cut it 5% and then they were happy as clams because they thought their haggling saved them some money. He said it was Trump wannabe’s most of the time.

Comment by WAman
2008-02-02 09:22:31

I have never posted about my family before - well here goes. My brother was an auto mechanic who had is own shop for years. Could fix cars, but had very little business sense. A few years back he finally decided to let someone else pay the bills and got a job at another shop. About a year ago I got a Xmas card form him and his business card fell out. He now is a Fox and Lazo realtor.

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2008-02-02 08:47:09

LMAO!! Reminds me of my BIL who bragged about buying cfc @ 18 then rode it all the way down.

 
 
Comment by Houstonstan
2008-02-02 04:53:36

Ah, a specimen who enrolled in a get stupid quick scheme.

He is going to be awarded a free honorary degree from the University of life”: MA in “Poverty studies”

Comment by oc-ed
2008-02-02 08:15:43

Or added to the Great Bailout Victim List by our esteemed RIPresentatives.

 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-02 05:06:25


Trends for Downsizing the US: The Bright Side of the Panic of ‘08

by Christopher Ketcham

Futurist and trends forecaster Gerald Celente, director of the Trends Research Institute in Rhinebeck, NY, predicted the 1987 stock market crash, the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989, the Asian economic implosion of ‘97, the decline of the dollar beginning in 2005, the meteoric rise in gold prices in an age of currency volatility, and the turn of events that may be the blessing of our era, the subprime mortgage crisis. Because of this habit of prescience, Celente has appeared regularly on CNN and Fox and MSNBC, his “Trends Reports” widely quoted in newsprint, on Oprah Winfrey, on Good Morning America.

Now in his Report for 2008, issued in mid-December, he carried the news every thinking American already knows. “The United States of America,” Celente pronounced, “has gone from first class to third rate.” It’s a “nation on the skids and heading down.” Celente projects economic and political crisis in the coming year. “In 2008, Americans will wake up to the worst economic times that anyone alive has ever seen,” he wrote on December 17. “Just as they didn’t see 9/11 coming and were frozen in shock when terror struck, [Americans] will be frozen in shock when terror strikes again.” He predicts “failing banks, busted brokerages, toppled corporate giants, bankrupt cities, states in default, foreign creditors cashing out of US securities…the stage is set, the big one is on its way.”

http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/content/view/3311/81/

Comment by WT Economist
2008-02-02 05:46:41

In the world of envirnomental impact statements, this is known as the “reasonable worst case scenario.” You create it by taking the reasonable worst case outcomes for a series of variables, and multiplying them together.

It probably won’t happen, but it could.

In any event, it is a testimony to the state of our culture, politics and economy that so many believe that a recession will bring about the end of the world.

Comment by Michael Fink
2008-02-02 06:28:19

IMHO, we are in a recession right now (especially where I live, in FL), and, believe it or not, the world is continuing to go on. God forbid we all need to tighten our spending down a bit. And the stock markets fall a bit. Is that really the end of the world as we know it? And frankly, this recession is going to have a most welcome upside at the end; the idea that houses are for living in and not investments or speculative instruments.

We will all live through this; and life will go on. It will be painful for some; but frankly, we will fare much better then the majority through our foresight into how this was all going to play out.

Imagine the poor idiot RE agent who is heading into this with a few homes purchased at the peak (that are eating him alive), sales falling off a cliff, and the very real prospect that their entire line of business will be eliminated, or at least significantly altered, in the very near future. Or the MTG broker. Or the homebuilder. Or the carpenter.

Just look on the bright side; this is a deflationary spiral we are entering; and, for those that can just maintain their salary, will quickly find out that they are MUCH “richer” on the other end of this then they were going in. Yes, jobs could be scarce, and that certainly may hurt all of us in one way or another. But just be so thankful your not trying to replace a job working for National City reselling MTGs for 150K a year right now!

Comment by RoundSparrow
2008-02-02 07:23:51

most welcome upside at the end; the idea that houses are for living in and not investments or speculative instruments.

That seems to me to be on par as saying you can eliminate people’s belief in religion or astrology. It ain’t going to happen. It can decline, but it will always be there and always be a factor in the price.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oc-ed
2008-02-02 08:23:22

I think that the perception of houses as investments will diminish in lock step with the losses these investors have to eat. More loss translates into less faith. Manias are built on faith, not facts. Not being able to pay your bills because your “investment” is eating your cash is a cold, hard, personally experienced fact that will quickly dissipate ones faith in that form of money making. Tulips anyone, how about some beanie babies.

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-02 10:09:58

Even when I was a kid (not all THAT long ago), houses weren’t viewed as investments. This is a more recent phenomenon and can easily become history, it’s not necessarily integral to the human psyche.

 
Comment by Chip
2008-02-02 10:50:15

Hopefully, this is a reasonable analogy relative to the general perception of housing as investment: In the 1960s, muscle cars came darned close to replacing women as the #1 interest in my life and many others. For (principally) young men, they were the most awesome machines ever invented and we snapped them up. Then the 1973 oil crisis happened and over the next several years you just about couldn’t give away a gas-guzzling muscle car. Beautiful-condition Pontiac GTOs were for sale for $700.

If that could happen to what is most folks’ second most-valuable single asset, why can’t it happen to housing? Just as a car can sell for far below its cost of construction, given the right stimulus, why can’t a McMansion or most any house?

 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2008-02-02 11:07:02

Of course it can, and it will.

Not only that, but most cars and others high-cost items fall in price as soon as they have been titled and “soiled” -no matter how lightly - by the owners.

Prediction: not only will new houses fall in price, and not only will everybody “know” you can’t make money buying and selling houses, but even further: new houses, like new cars, will go down in value as soon as they are occupied, forcing owners to stay to reduce depreciation/time.

 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2008-02-02 07:28:27

other than gov workers and bk lawyers-who gets to keep making money ?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-02 07:46:47

My own definition of a “depression”:

When the civil servants stop going to Starbuck’s.

 
Comment by tresho
2008-02-02 18:18:55

who gets to keep making money? — the employees of the US Mint.

 
 
Comment by crispy&cole
2008-02-02 07:37:11

Great post!

We are also in a recession here in the Central Ca based on numerous contacts and data I review. Things are tough for kool-aid drinking REIC members and fat is being cut out of the system, but people are still living and signs of a depression still dont exist.

Will it get worse, I am sure it will, but life will go on and this country will be much better for it. The bubble excess will be cleaned and many valuable lessons will be learned.

Many opportunities will present themselves over the next 5 years and I would rather take advantage of them instead of running scared. For example, in 1997 when oil reached 8 bbl for Kern River Crude the LA Times had a front page story stating that Bakersfield would be a ghost town as oil and ag were done. Its always darkest before the dawn. I am not saying go out and buy anything now, especially not SFH, just dont fear opportunities.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-02-02 08:51:31

“Just look on the bright side; this is a deflationary spiral we are entering; and, for those that can just maintain their salary, will quickly find out that they are MUCH “richer” on the other end of this then they were going in. Yes, jobs could be scarce, and that certainly may hurt all of us in one way or another”

Thanks for those nice explanations, Michael and Crispy. I guess that’s my position right now. My in laws and I had another rousing 1930’s discussion last night. Again, they stated they were fine because their parents never lost their jobs although there were several cousins that would have been in trouble had it not been for FDR programs. Btw, they spoke of FDR like he was a saint and my fil is a private school bred, Republican w/old money. (Love those independent thinkers. ;) )

Anyhow, the country certainly moved to greater glory after the last severe downturn (afraid to use the word now). I don’t equate another one w/Armageddon even if I do enjoy a little hyperbole from time to time. Like the last one, we won’t all be experiencing the same thing, it won’t go down exactly like the last one because there are so many differences, and we won’t all experience the worst. Heck, like the last one, some will even make fortunes during it. The Fuller Brush Company is one example.

Personally I enjoy reading up on the GD as a groupthink study. People don’t change.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2008-02-02 16:29:57

Everyone I know who lived through the GD also speak of FDR as a saint. I have yet to hear anyone who actually lived through it criticize any of the work programs & other social safety nets.

 
 
 
Comment by spike66
2008-02-02 08:14:57

“In any event, it is a testimony to the state of our culture, politics and economy that so many believe that a recession will bring about the end of the world.”

Nicely said.

 
Comment by Ernest
2008-02-02 08:49:32

Or that so many believe that this housing lead debacle will be just a “recession”.

Recession is part of the normal cycle. This is not normal. We have a broke US government. A dollar value that is very weak. Along with a cascading housing collapse that is loaded with fraud and greed. (Not to mention that it is being obfuscated or not even acknowledged in all kinds of government investments, 401K’s & MF’s.) We also have a significant amount of the US population who are debted out and lastly we are entering the BB retirement phase or at least old age & dependence. They will be looking for thier SS and some are invested in 401Ks which are invested in many of the same things. I don’t know about the end of the world but we are largely in uncharted territory here. We have had nothing like this since the GD. It won’t play out like that did but my crystal ball also won’t tell how it does.

Comment by WAman
2008-02-02 09:30:39

Ernest me thinks that you need to do a little research befoe you make such claims. The US had many deep recessions in the 1800’s that were much worse them the ones after the GD.

In addition the dollar falling does not affect me very much at all! I do not buy the junk that is made in the far east. I buy most food from local sources and soon my energy will come from the solar panels on my roof!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by CA renter
2008-02-02 16:31:15

Well said, Ernest!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Blackbox
2008-02-02 06:02:40

Looks like the guy has been on a winning streak for quite a while.
Cool. Odds are that he is wrong this time. Plus going from first rate to third rate is quite a leap. I do believe we are near second rate, but that’s just me. Don’t ever count America out. I don’t like lots of things that are happening in this country, but never count America out. Many have been made fools doing you……..

 
Comment by danni
2008-02-02 06:18:27

“….cats and dogs, living together. Mass Hysteria!!!!”

Sorry, couldn’t resist.;)
Interesting article though.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-02 10:13:59

Right now I have two dogs sleeping on the couch snuggled up to three cats. It’s snowing outside. Very peaceful. LOL.

 
Comment by MaryLee
2008-02-03 01:20:10

My 185 (yes, 285) lb Malamute loved the kitties. Alas, it was not mutual, as two of them regularly popped him in the nose when he tried to gently snuffle them. Hurt his feelings very much bad. Very much peaceful.

Comment by MaryLee
2008-02-03 01:22:09

….can’t type. That’s 185…slightly larger than a shetland pony….sorry

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2008-02-02 12:31:32

Anyone else hearing “Always Look on the Bright Side of Life” in their heads? :D

Comment by oc-ed
2008-02-02 21:46:20

Good One! Got me chuckling.

 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-02-02 05:22:14

from a link in Winter’s blog re Countrywide;

“The mortgage lender also recorded an impairment charge of $831 million during the quarter tied to securities backed by prime home equity lines of credit typically reserved for borrowers with excellent credit histories.”

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5h7ceutg-wJBodBAWBkQ1j4dDlCMwD8UFKG680

The snowball has officially picked up prime HELOCs. Maybe not news here, but news to me.

Comment by Chip
2008-02-02 11:07:02

If I follow your view correctly, yes, I also see a quickly rising storm re HELOCs and home equity loans. It should have been expected, yet of course there will be shock and dismay in the news. There probably are a heck of a lot of FBs who have been counting on that cash to see them through whatever their personal financial issue may be.

Wonder if that will be when consumer spending begins to decelerate very rapidly and very obviously. I also wonder how many more homoaners this will flush out from the sellers’ sidelines.

 
 
Comment by mgnyc
2008-02-02 05:52:57

sorry if this is a duplicate post

check out michelle malkin of the ny post on subrpime whiners
sounds like she is a regular here. she has all the catch phrases down

this blog is so far ahead of the msm it is ridculous
ben keep up the good work

http://www.nypost.com/seven/02022008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/the_subprime_whiners_953585.htm

Comment by danni
2008-02-02 06:30:40

great article
I’ve been wondering when we’d start seeing the flip side of the coin in the MSM, ie, the priced out buyers, war on savers etc.

Comment by Kim
2008-02-02 13:40:21

“I’ve been wondering when we’d start seeing the flip side of the coin in the MSM, ie, the priced out buyers, war on savers etc.”

Been wondering that myself. Doesn’t seem the reporters have been inclined to open their financial statements.

 
 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-02 05:58:28

“But Achuthan still holds out hope that a stimulus package from Washington could save the day.”

So, now his forecast for a recession is based on what politicians do and not on economic data?

Jas
-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-
http://www.businesscycle.com/news/press/1428/

Recession Watcher’s Rx: Stimulus Now!

U.S. News & World Report

1-February-2008

(U.S. News & World Report) - Lakshman Achuthan, who predicts recessions over at the Economic Cycle Research Institute, is gearing up for his latest call.

His weekly gauge of future U.S. economic growth sank, and the ECRI’s annualized growth rate forecast plummeted back to a six-year low last seen in early January. In short, economic growth that managed to continue through the end of 2007 may be experiencing its last gasps.

“The window of opportunity to avert a U.S. recession is about to slam shut. This isn’t good,” he says.

Achuthan’s opinion is worth a listen, as it comes with one of the better track records around. His group successfully predicted the last two U.S. recessions and managed to avoid a good chunk of false starts over the past couple of years, which is why his heightened concerns are another bit of bad news in a week when a host of reports showed weakness on everything from jobs to consumer spending.

But Achuthan still holds out hope that a stimulus package from Washington could save the day.

He reminds us that recessions rarely happen without the factory sector throwing in the towel. Today’s report from the Institute of Supply Management showed some surprising resilience in the sector that could continue if—and only if—consumer demand doesn’t fall off a cliff. The only way that will happen, he says, is if they get that extra infusion of government cash in the form of the $150 billion stimulus package making its way through Congress. And they need it now.

“That may give us this moment to sneak something in before the window slams shut,” he says. “You could do something later this year, and it’ll have nothing to do with averting a recession. You have to be doing something today. Or yesterday.”

Comment by NotInMontana
2008-02-02 09:46:38

“factory sector”? Seems obsolete if it’s just US numbers. What about a “1099 sector”?

 
Comment by Chip
2008-02-02 11:11:31

“‘This isn’t good,’ he says.”

Sort of O/T, but there must be a couple of hours in Journalism 101 where the prof tells the students never to use the word “bad” when referring to economic activity. The proper and most concise sentence would have been, “This is bad.” But how often do we read it written that way?

 
 
Comment by bizarroworld
2008-02-02 06:16:06

Massachusetts Accuses Merrill of Fraud
http://tinyurl.com/333eos

The case underscores how subprime investments keep turning up in unexpected places and raises new questions about Wall Street’s sales practices and its role in the mortgage crisis. In recent years, as home prices soared and mortgage lending boomed, investment banks packaged hundreds of billions of dollars of home loans into securities for sale to investors around the world. Now, record defaults are resulting in huge losses for municipalities, states, banks, insurance companies and nonprofit organizations.

It looks like many states are seeing the economic carnage that’s coming from poor investing practices and the resultant slashing of services and large tax increases that are likely to follow.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 06:46:58

Toxic mortgage debt = leading U.S. export product

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 06:16:53

We must stop housing market deflation”

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080201/news_lz1e1gross.html

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 06:24:32

I see this opinion piece as part of a dangerous pattern of psuedo-populism currently practiced by certain influential individuals who serve up ostensibly helpful free policy advice in the Op-Ed pages, while potentially lining up their bets behind the scenes to profit wildly if said advice is followed.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 06:44:59

‘”The average wage in the financial district is $330,000, but the overall census numbers are around $40,000,” says Jonathan Miller, director of research at Radar Logic, a New York real estate firm, of the city’s median income level. So long as the number of pricey homes available doesn’t outpace the number of people able to buy them, he says, a market can be in balance, despite an apparent imbalance in income-to-home-price ratio.’

Does that statement seem nonsensical to anyone besides me? (Maybe it is just that I have drunk no coffee yet.) Perhaps it depends on how one defines ‘income-to-home-price-ratio’ (e.g., based on averages or medians, and depending on whether one first ratios then averages or vice versa). Regardless of details, too low of an income-to-home-price-ratio in a market with too many vacant McMansions is out of balance. My comment is likely far more applicable to CA than to Manhattan.

Comment by mgnyc
2008-02-02 07:39:53

pb- jonathan miller is another hack-he thinks life begins and ends in manhattan, he post these really pretty grahps on curbed.com every few weeks

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-02 09:02:37

The fishbowl effect thrives in NYC.

 
 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-02-02 10:39:17

Look, even if they printed enough money, and gave it to each houseowner to “pay off the house”, house prices would still collapse.

Remember the house price/income ratio? That’s the gravitational pull.

All of this pi$$i*n’ in a thunderstorm! Stay dry. :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Michael Fink
2008-02-02 06:37:35

Oh, good timing.. I am off to the gym in a few minutes, and that article just pis**d me off so bad I am certain to get a good workout in.

Listen up as**ole.. There are BUYERS and SELLERS in every free market, including housing. Housing price deflation is BAD for sellers but GOOD for buyers. How do you even begin to justify using govt backing to scr*w over one group of people over the other? Especially, when you examine it, this is really (yet another) intergenerational transfer of wealth plan you are talking about. How many people under the age of 21 own houses? And how many people over the age of 55 don’t own houses? As you can see, this is clearly a govt subsidy to the older generations. How about we follow Kudlow’s advice (which he ALWAYS seems loathe to follow himself) and let “Free market capitalism lead the path to prosperity”.

Below market loans for REFINANCING.. What an a***ole!

Comment by Grey
2008-02-02 07:49:34

If you really want to get ticked off, you should read what the FDIC chairmperson Bair recommended to banks: “Short re-fis”.
If anyone posted this story already, I apologize.

http://www.bankrate.com/brm/story_content.asp?story_uid=24505&prodtype=mtg

This just sent me over the edge. Any thoughts (I’m sure there will be many) or rants regarding this?

P.S. Ben, I hope you get to feeling better!

 
Comment by diogenes (Tampa,Fl)
2008-02-02 08:10:49

The loans are ALREADY below market. They have been for 7 years due to the FED setting artificially low rates. They are now coming back into a stabilization process based on ASSESSED RISK. They need to rise substantially to account for crappy buyers with fraudulent documents.
Screw you, Bill Gross. You think asset price inflation is good for America. Do you think this could have saved the 1920’s buyers of bogus Florida Swamp Land?? They needed their purchasing prices to stay up high so they could profit from the frenzy. Didn’t happen. It should not be condoned here, either.

 
 
Comment by Lip
2008-02-02 06:55:48

“What’s needed is not just $600 checks that will flow into Wal-Mart (and then to the Chinese) but an expanded Federal Housing Administration program offering below-market, 30-year mortgage refinancings with minimal down payments, which the private market and Bernanke cannot provide. Republican orthodoxy seems so intent on curtailing the past abuses of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that some politicians are looking past a government agency solution in their own back yard. Housing and our finance-based market mania got us into this mess. Housing and government-based financial solutions must begin to get us out of it. ”

Hey Einstein, who’s gonna pay for “below-market, 30-year mortgage refinancings with minimal down payments”???

We all are!

Yea right, the Republicans want to stop it but none of them have the gonads to do anything constructive. The Dems just want to add $15 Billion to the stimulus package. By the time it’s approved, it’ll be a $300 Billion package that our kids will have to repay with inflated $$$. What’s a few extra Billion when it’s an election year?

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 07:07:27

Is it safe to assume that BG is pandering in the press to whichever of Obama or HC he hopes will get elected?

 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-02 07:25:36

It’s already Febraury and those checks are still months away. Let’s see how long Boom Boom’s 1.25 honeymoon lasts. For FBs there’s at least four months of bills that need paying in the meantime.

Overall I still prefer comparing these economic events, not to other economic events, but to warfare. Why? Because in warfare we see so many times how the grandest of plans are overrun by events on the ground - as they may be here too.

Comment by spike66
2008-02-02 08:27:39

“grandest of plans are overrun by events on the ground”

I agree with John on the battle metaphor. While the dems try to extend unemployment benefits, the repubs resist. And the clock is ticking, note Blue Skye’s post that prime Heloc’s are starting to default. At some point, these “victim” stories will get old too. Any proposed solutions may be abandoned as this thing rolls along. Shows you gotta keep paying attention.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 08:54:53

You really have to shed lotsa tears to overcome your sympathetic grief with buyers of $500K+ homes discovering the hard way that real estate does not always go up.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 15:24:53

Prices: Housing and consumption
(China Daily)
Updated: 2008-02-02 10:26

Unlike developed countries, the fall in housing prices in China will stimulate rather than reduce consumption, says an article in Oriental Morning Post. The following is an excerpt.

Following the fall of house prices in the United States, China’s housing prices have also become sluggish. People are wondering whether this would affect domestic consumption and economic growth.

We believe that the fall in our housing prices is different from that of the US. In the US an individual owns his or her land, and gains from the appreciation of the land also belongs to the individual. In China, land is owned by the State or a collective group and the major beneficiaries of land appreciation are the government and State-owned enterprises.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2008-02/02/content_6437507.htm

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-02 06:19:06

With his Californian orange perma-tan and gleaming teeth, the homeloans tycoon Angelo Mozilo is fast becoming America’s most loathed character in the cast of grinning financiers behind the sub-prime mortgage crisis.

Mozilo’s company, Countrywide Financial, has written more sub-prime homeloans than any of its rivals.

It has a portfolio of 9m mortgages - and it has had to set aside a catastrophic $1.9bn to cope with soaring defaults.

The 68-year-old butcher’s son from the Bronx co-founded the business in 1969 and until recently, he was one of America’s best paid bosses - he trousered a hefty $142m in 2006.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/feb/01/subprimecrisis.useconomy

Comment by Lip
2008-02-02 08:35:26

He’s nothing more than pond scum.

Was talking to a financial guy this week and he said that the B of A buyout has a penalty clause in it that they’d have to pay X if they back out.

If so, how big would the penalty payment have to be before it’s in B of A’s best interest to back out anyway?

Or in other words, what’s the lowest amount that B of A is going to loose in this deal?

Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-02 10:22:12

Mozilla - the porn star of finance. Sleazy SOB.

Comment by REhobbyist
2008-02-02 16:50:30

Countrywide is my mortgage servicer. I’m in the middle of a refinance and am looking forward to not having to be their customer anymore.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-02 17:33:55

From farther above, it sounds like he/CFC is also the leader in writing down prime loans too - though he may have jumped the starting gun on that one. (No one else seems to be racing yet.)

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 06:31:42

The Subprime Cleanup Intensifies
By Kara Scannell, Anita Raghavan and Amir Efrati
Word Count: 723 | Companies Featured in This Article: UBS, Merrill Lynch

Federal criminal prosecutors in New York are investigating whether UBS AG misled investors by booking inflated prices of mortgage bonds it held despite knowledge that the valuations had dropped, according to people familiar with the matter.

The investigation, by the U.S. attorney in New York’s Eastern District in Brooklyn, is preliminary. The U.S. attorney’s office frequently works closely with the Securities and Exchange Commission to coordinate efforts to gather information. The New York prosecutors haven’t issued subpoenas, according to people familiar with the matter.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120191503643937097.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 06:32:52

Merrill Faces Fraud Allegations
By Craig Karmin
Word Count: 362 | Companies Featured in This Article: Merrill Lynch

Massachusetts state authorities accused Merrill Lynch & Co. on Friday of fraud and misrepresentation related to the firm’s sale of debt securities that rapidly collapsed during the credit crisis.

The allegations come just a day after Merrill bought back the securities, known as collateralized debt obligations, from Springfield, Mass. Merrill repurchased the CDOs at the same price of $13.9 million that the firm initially sold them to the city last spring.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120188715142635667.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 06:34:33

My optimism that subprime mortgage lending kingpins will be brought to justice is steadily increasing.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-02 06:38:33

“The lawyer’s truth is not Truth, but consistency or a consistent expediency.”

Henry David Thoreau

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-02 06:36:30

“Our houses are such unwieldy property that we are often imprisoned rather than housed by them.”

Henry David Thoreau

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-02 07:35:31

Good quote. I often wonder how many Ibsen-esqe characters are out there, imprisioned in their “dreams”.

Hedda, are you out there honey? Don’t worry it’ll be okay.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-02 07:51:59

“How does it become a man to behave towards the American government today? I answer, that he cannot without disgrace be associated with it.”

H.D.Tv

 
 
Comment by arlingtonva
2008-02-02 09:17:52

“The things you own end up owning you.”

Tyler Durden

 
 
Comment by KingSlug
2008-02-02 06:38:21

A comment on consumer williness to buy toys. My BIL manages a bikes shop in South Orange County where the lowest cost bike is $800. Well, sales are way off for the 1st 30 days of the year, but people coming in for bike tune-ups has increased. They are hoping sales will pick-up with income tax refunds and tax rebates, otherwise the owner will be reducing the stores by half this summer, and half the employees will be gone. This has the work force worried, because much like realtors bike guys were living off the fat of the land. Gone are the days of selling 3-6 bikes at 2-6K a day to homeowners flushed with cash.

Enjoy

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-02 06:40:08

“Gone are the days of selling 3-6 bikes at 2-6K a day to homeowners flushed with cash.”

Tour de Farce

 
Comment by palmetto
2008-02-02 06:50:02

“They are hoping sales will pick-up with income tax refunds and tax rebates”

Seems like there’s a lot of hope out there focused on those rebates. Ebay’s changing its policies “hoping” the money gets spent on its site, too.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-02 07:43:25

What changes at eBay, Palm?

King Slug’s post is interesting to me because I see a lot of empty stores up here - including the many bike shops. I told my girlfriend that they kept up staff for the holidays, then for the after holiday sales and gift cards, and then for the January inventory. We’re at a turning point in February though, do they keep up staff and wait for quick turnaround or do they cut now?

BTW - be careful with those expensive bikes in the big cities. They’ll throw rocks at you to knock you off and get the bike - happened to my girlfriend riding Bianchi on the lakefront path. That’s why I ride a recycled forty year old Chicago Schwinn.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-02 07:47:14

My “rosebud” is a early 1970’s Schwinn Sting Ray.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by palmetto
2008-02-02 08:01:18

“What changes at eBay, Palm?”

edge, there are a number of changes in the works, but the standout changes are the elimination of some listing fees in favor of higher final value fees IF the item sells and the really twisted policy that only buyers may leave negative or neutral feedback, sellers may only leave positive feedback (or nothing at all) for buyers, no matter what the buyers do. Weird. Changes go into effect in May, about when those rebate checks are supposed to be showing up. It always takes a long time for a behemoth to perish, so ebay will be around for a while, but diminishing all the way. No business lasts when it punishes its customers. I haven’t been active on ebay in a while, it used to be kinda fun, but the corporate idiocy has put an end to that. I suppose it is inevitable. Over the years, ebay has become more corporate and more complex and futher away from what made it successful in the first place.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-02 08:48:17

I probably did around 40,000 transactions on eBay, selling from 1999 till a few years ago, until the thrill was gone.

Early on, it was pretty obvious that my clientelle was from the hinterlands, as perhaps 90% of my buyers were from non-big city America.

Imagine being stuck in some small town, largely void of life from a commerce standpoint, when eBay showed up, and you could buy all the things that heretofore, only folks in metropolises could easily acquire?

3/4’s of my eBay transactions were paid, using paypal. (credit cards)

Game over, now.

 
Comment by bulwark
2008-02-02 09:00:36

Likewise, I haven’t been there for awhile. One time we tried to sell a laptop but got nothing but Nigerian fraudster offers. eBay received its listing fee, however, and it was so complicated to get a refund we gave up. It’s a lousy company.

 
Comment by WAman
2008-02-02 09:46:31

The fee changes go into effect 2/20. Final value fee on first $25 goes from 5.25% to 8.75%. I will try to sell the rest of my stuff (silver proof sets, mintwrapped quarter sets, etc) in the next few weeks. Look for below mint priced items I am cbroncos on ebay/

 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2008-02-02 11:24:44

‘Final value fee on first $25 goes from 5.25% to 8.75%.’

Hmmmm, an adjustment to shipping fees may cover that tithe. For a $25 item, the 3.5% FVF increase can be painted over with the 80 cent shipping boost. When I bid on Ebay, I always factor shipping charges into my bid. Whether Ebay tries to curtail shipping fee inflation, I do not know how well that can be monitored.

 
 
 
 
Comment by DcBob
2008-02-02 07:35:22

performance bikes, a large retailer, is closing several stores due to this reason. I have no link for the info, a friend is a manager of one store and he told me this info. So, take the hear say with a grain of salt.

 
Comment by exeter
2008-02-02 08:08:16

$800 for a friggin’ bicycle? Good grief….

Comment by NotInMontana
2008-02-02 09:55:25

The WalMart bikes don’t hold up too well, and there heavy as $hit too. But probably most (us) bikers have our rigs already, so no there won’t be a lot of splurging on new carbon-frame rigs anymore.

 
Comment by SF Mechanist
2008-02-02 13:39:46

^^Exactly

I’ve paid a lot more. $800 will be the least it takes to get a halfway quality bike.

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-02 17:42:49

I knew a guy who got a concussion while riding a $3000 bicycle in a strange city. He was wandering around dazed and confused for awhile after. I’m sure his bike brought him increased respect from the minions of justice before his wife found him. Of course if someone had stolen the status symbol, it wouldnt have helped.

 
 
Comment by black swan
2008-02-02 09:10:48

A few days ago, I was in Scottsdale and noticed that a bike shop in a strip mall had vacated since my last visit to that center.

I keep wondering how well a local pool company with showrooms throughout the valley, will survive the downturn now that the heloc well has gone dry.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-02 09:21:48

A pool is a hole in the ground, you throw expensive chemicals into.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 15:34:32

No chemicals are needed if you don’t mind a green layer at the top, suitable for breeding West Nile virus bearing mosquitos.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-02 10:28:07

Love my Specialized Cruiser, sort of a blend of MTB and granny bike, cost $350 new. Used to ride a Klein, expensive and too stiff. Sales of inexpensive bikes may go up if gas goes up and recession gets worse.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-02 12:55:45

At a local university here, the serious bikers have rides that look “crappy” to the layperson. There’s a thriving market in second hand frames, parts etc. from high end bikes. These kids wouldn’t be caught dead with a shiny store bought bike - it is a badge of honor to cobble a bike together themselves. They’ll get around no matter what comes our way.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by KingSlug
2008-02-02 16:19:54

Its called a fixie.

 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2008-02-02 18:05:57

No, a “fixie” is a fixed-gear bike - one with a single gear attached directly to the rear hub (no free wheel and therefore no coasting possible) as is commonly used in track racing.

Also, all bicycles are essentially “cobbled together.” However, serious road cyclists do not ride bikes with overly-used componentry.

 
Comment by KingSlug
2008-02-02 19:59:24

All the cool kids I know riding old steel frames are building out fixies, both for Mtn and road. If you are truly daring you ride without brakes and pratice the skid stop. I keep a fixie with a flipflop hub and a trainer at work for late night fitness.

Your right though alot of college kids are putting together nice road warrior/urban post consumer bikes from the past. I converted my parents 1970s bikes and am a habitual shopped at yard sales during my Sat/Sun rides.

I actually just picked up a Specialized StumpJumper HT 29er just a week ago, pro-dealed through BIL. Its actually a replacement for my commuter that was clipped (and then run over) last year. 20 miles a day is all we ask, Clydesdales Unite!!!

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-02-02 06:44:28

big homes, big problem

Down the block from my home, workmen are finishing a new house. It replaces a bungalow that had measured about 1,500 square feet. The new home has a covered front porch, two fireplaces and a finished basement. It comes in at just under 5,700 square feet. What is it with Americans and their homes?

http://www.newsweek.com/id/82709?from=rss

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-02 07:42:33

My sister and her husband in Tucson, decided to build a “cabin” in Mt. Lemmon, (how appropriate?) a year ago.

A big fire took out about 3/4’s of the existing houses, 5 years ago, and most of the new “cabins” up there are of the gargantuan “see me-dig me” flavor, all built on postage stamp lots, on steep angled hillsides, forcing every “cabin” to be on stilts.

The older cabins that didn’t burn down, tend to be plain jane small mountain cabins, as they were built in the 1950’s-60’s.

I hazard to guess how much my sister and her husband paid for their “cabin”, but i’m sure the price was steep.

They’ll probably use it a week or 2 a year, at most.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-02-02 09:17:27

From watcher’s link:
“In Sweden, Britain and Italy, new homes average under 1,000 square feet.”

Wow…my first home was 1300 sq ft. With only 4 of us, we enjoyed our yard a lot! Got lots of sun and exercise, though…good times.

Note: just drove down in laws old road yesterday. At over 3000 sq feet in the 1970s I suppose they were pushing the bigger is better housing thing when they built their home. Once heavily wooded, their road has experienced an influx of building in the last 5 years. Their home now looks like a little dwarf. And the building continues.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-02 10:30:25

Am planning on building a 600 sq. ft. house. Check out the book “Little House on a Small Planet” - very good.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
Comment by WAman
2008-02-02 07:07:02

Time to end the oil and gas subsidies. Why should we pay to help XOM destroy the climate?

Comment by diogenes (Tampa,Fl)
2008-02-02 08:18:36

…………because stupid, greedy, moronic Americans want to drive Huge Luxury SUV’s to their homes in suburbia. That’s why.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 07:16:11

From a flier with my Saturday SD Union-Tribune:

EDGEWATER
NOW SELLING!
From the mid $1 millions
Approx. 3.516 to 5.147 sq. ft.
3 to 5 brs
3 and 4 bay garages
(Approx $291 to $426 per sq. ft.)

CLAYBOURNE
NOW SELLING!
From the mid $1 millions
2 story homes
Approx. 4.610 to 5.628 sq. ft.
(Approx $267 to $325 per sq. ft.)
4 and 5 bedrooms
3 and 4 bay garages

Understated Elegance.
Overriding Prestige.

LiveTheLakes.com

(My question about these “Overridingly Prestigious” homes: Will the marketing effort involve the use of giant red balloons festooned with bold capital lettering that screams “NEW HOMES SELLING NOW“?)

Comment by Paul in Jax
2008-02-02 18:12:45

How can 5000 sq ft that costs $1.5 million have understated elegance? Perhaps there is some kind of automatic elegance that is evinced in SoCal when you pay way more than is prudent for something way bigger than necessary?

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-02 07:19:02

Fed’s rate cuts may kill US dollar soon

By cutting interest rates the US Fed expects to stimulate consumption, crucially lower mortgage payments, and in the process trigger a recovery in the US economy. Be that as it may, top economists — including Noble Laureate Joseph Stiglitz — point out to the futility of this exercise saying that this cut in interest rates will have little impact on the overall scenario

According to them, it is a case of too little and too late — akin to applying pain balm when chemotherapy was the need of the hour.

http://english.pravda.ru/business/finance/01-02-2008/103800-kill_us_dollar-0

Comment by cactus
2008-02-02 07:56:37

Yes if the Banks go down by God they will take any savers with them.

 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2008-02-02 09:25:27

BB has lost all credibility. I don’t even think he is running the show anymore. Instead of cleaning house and getting rid of the Bernies, he/they/the PTB decided to follow the Japanese model.

 
 
Comment by Shake
2008-02-02 07:30:36

URL: http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/printarticle.asp?id=mwo020108

What Does a Recession Look Like?
Feburary 1, 2008
By John Mauldin

What Does a Recession Look Like?
The Starbucks Index
Consumer Spending Slows Down
Rising Unemployment Starts to Show Up
It is All About Valuations

Comment by Shake
2008-02-02 08:38:37

I think this forecast will be pretty accurate. Meager growth for a few years. I don’t think we can discount the effect of globalization on the US economy, wages and labor market. I think The Fed may have to remain at low interest rates for awhile in order to compensate for lack of wage growth.

 
Comment by WAman
2008-02-02 10:14:54

Thanks for the link - interesting read! I wonder if it would have been different if he knew about the 0.6% GDP?

 
 
Comment by Shake
2008-02-02 07:34:10

The NBER definition of recession has changed. By this definition(below) we have been in recession since 2000 since real income and total employment are not as high as they were then. That explains why if not for Iraq, the economy would have always been the primary issue the last 7 years.

The NBER does not define a recession in terms of two consecutive quarters of decline in real GDP. Rather, a recession is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial production, and wholesale-retail sales. For more information, see the latest announcement on how the NBER’s Business Cycle Dating Committee chooses turning points in the Economy and its latest memo, dated 07/17/03.

http://www.nber.org/cycles/recessions.html
http://www.nber.org/cycles.html

Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-02 08:21:42


“The NBER does not define a recession in terms of two consecutive quarters of decline in real GDP.”

And for a good reason. In 2001, we had a -ve (Q2), a +ve (Q3), and a -ve quarter (Q4). The quarter in the middle was stimulus package! I agree with NBER recession dating. One must keep in mind that the “real recovery” doesn’t take place for 4-8 quarters after the economic growth begins. There are lots of lags in the economy.

Jas

Comment by Shake
2008-02-02 08:58:55

I don’t think this will be a typical recession and then back to the good times. I think what we’re witnessing is a slowdown of epic proportions that will result in meager growth for a few years - John Mauldin refers to this as the “muddle thru”. I think it will mean a return to something more sustainable for people in terms of spending, saving and financial awareness. Until this happens, I don’t think we’ll see a return to a typical bull.

 
Comment by bulwark
2008-02-02 09:07:17

That explains why the economic stimulus checks will arrive in the Q2 this year. Q1 will show a decline but Q2 will show an increase, just in time for the election.

Comment by Shake
2008-02-02 09:43:25

I don’t think we’ll see the bump that’s being forecast. The economic stimulus package will be necessary for things like higher energy, health care and food costs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by NoVA RE Supernova
2008-02-02 08:02:11

http://www.larouchepub.com/pr/2008/080130hsg_depression.html

Housing Collapse Figures Approaching Great Depression Levels

 
Comment by NoVA RE Supernova
2008-02-02 08:05:34

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2008/3504constitution_or_fascism.html

As “casino economy” collapses, the US faces a stark choice: The Constitution, or fascism.

 
Comment by NoVA RE Supernova
 
Comment by watcher
2008-02-02 08:14:55

boom was a bust:

I don’t mean to trivialize our economic difficulties or the need for effective government intervention, but we have to face a disconcerting fact: For years now, that strange stimulus-crazed beast, the economy, has been going its own way, increasingly disconnected from the toils and troubles of ordinary Americans.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/01/AR2008020102828.html

 
Comment by watcher
2008-02-02 08:16:07

aggressive activism:

On January 30th America’s central bank cut its policy rate by half a percentage point to 3%, little more than a week after slashing that rate by 0.75 percentage points in an unscheduled meeting. Official short-term rates have now fallen by 2.25 percentage points since the credit turmoil stemming from American mortgages began last August. With underlying inflation running at well over 2%, real rates are now barely positive. In a matter of days, American monetary policy has gone from broadly neutral to clearly loose. Gone is the incremental approach to altering interest rates. Instead there is a new Bernanke boldness.

http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10609305

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 08:48:24

Instead, there is a new future wave of financial market volatility destined to hit the globalized financial system’s shores in less than two years from now.

Comment by Shake
2008-02-02 09:04:20

I seriously don’t think the Fed cares about this. This is the worst banking crisis since the Great Depression and they will have to use any and all methods to clean up the mess Greespan created. A bold approach is exactly what’s necessary in times like these :)

 
 
Comment by WAman
2008-02-02 10:17:53

Yes - because he knows how bad it is out there!

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-02 08:32:18

“The wars waged by Louis XIV left the country completely wasted, both economically and financially. And the resultant shortage of precious metals led to a shortage of coins in circulation, which in turn limited the production of new coins. It was in this context that the regent, Philippe d’Orléans, appointed John Law, as Controller General of Finances.”

Substitute Louis XIV and John Law, for ’ssshrubery & Ben Bernanke, and update things about 300 years into the future and history repeats itself nicely…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Law_(economist)

 
Comment by bizarroworld
2008-02-02 08:54:29

Hey Bush, Stimulate My Interest Rate
http://www.alternet.org/story/75765/

The solution is not to hand out several hundred bucks a head and urge the public to “buy American” to prop up the corporate economy. It’s to regulate exorbitant rates and unrestrained, nontransparent lending and trading practices. It’s to work toward increasing average incomes and decreasing the costs of corporate commandeered health care, energy and education.

Economic common sense will only get you so far. If this kind of thought were to permeate the masses, where would we get out next bubble and our next get rich quick scheme?

Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-02-02 09:53:24

Local news teaser announces that the government’s intension for your rebate check might not be the best thing for your personal situation. The story rallied for paying down of debt or savings.

 
Comment by CA renter
2008-02-02 17:01:53

It’s to regulate exorbitant rates and unrestrained, nontransparent lending and trading practices. It’s to work toward increasing average incomes and decreasing the costs of corporate commandeered health care, energy and education.
——————-
I agree, this would be a good start.

 
 
Comment by diogenes (Tampa,Fl)
2008-02-02 08:57:08

Just a summary report from FLORIDA.
Last week I was in St. Augustine and was staying with friends in JAX Beach. Four years ago I told them the prices were insane, I would not buy, this market will tank and there’s no way this former ghetto and crack town will keep the valuations we were seeing.
That was then, this is now. This market is schizophrenic.
I see it in transition, but not approaching reality as any sane person would see it. Like all coastal communities (i’ll be back in Clearwater Beach tomorrow), everyone thinks they are going to retire on their “Investments”, but can’t quite seem to get their price, or even have any idea what the price should be. Overall, prices are still high, some ridiculous, but their are sales and rental signs EVERYWHERE.
Here are some samples:
(and remember, alot of these are not NEW places, some are, but most are stucco’d over former apartments built in the 60’s and 70’s.) Most Condo’s were along 1st st., some on the water side, but none, unless mentioned are Oceanfront.

Condo 1/1 715 sf………..was $329K, now $289k. get real!
Condo 3/2.5…1530 sf………was $450, now $425k. how luxurious could a 3 bdr. 1500 sf living area be??
Condo 1/1 sf unknown….Oceanfront pool. ….$279,000.
Condo 2/2..S/S appliances…2nd flr…….sf unknown. $349k.
Townhouse (1st.st.) 3/3.5 2000 sf….the usually “luxury upgrades…………….$589,000 !!!

Vacant lots sold for about $20k to 30k before the boom starting in 2000-2001. Houses off the beach, closer to the intercoastal went from $85k to $125k.
When I looked 2 years ago………..lots were going from $80-$100k, if you could find a buyer.
Saw a pair of lots (typically 50 x 100 or 115) asking: 195K each, or the pair for $365k. You can buy nearby houses for less.
Another one on Seabreeze avenue (not near the sea) is asking $150k for 50×115 lot. They will add a 1900 sf house if you will bring $435k to the closing table.
An entire subdivision of remaining vacant land is near the JTB (202) intersection with A1A, south side of Jax Beach.
Not a single house has been built. None. We stopped by the sales office on Monday morning to find out about pricing. No one was in the office. The place was deserted.

Flippers still working the market. We saw a number of rehabs in process. Some for sale “as is”.
Sample asking prices:

Fairway Ln. 2140 sf. lot 100×150 on golf course..$475k.
Atlantic Beach..2nd st. 2410sf 4 bdr, 2 blocks to water……….reduced 50k to $699.9k Lot is 50 x 140.
The best part, if you buy this house, the agents will through in 2 beach bikes, so you can ride from your house to the beach.
Everyone thinks that prices will hold because this area is special. Everyone wants to live there. The folks with money from Jax want to move there….blah, blah, blah.

I did find one tear-down lot. House built in the 40’s, a wood frame, termite treat with 7′ ceilings. Total trash. Previously asking $80k, but had a reduced sign on it. The free-standing 2 car block garage was worth more than the house.

A good 35%- 40% reduction in everything would make this all seem reasonable, unless some more Califoricators come by with their easy house-lottery money, saying that these properties are “undervalued”.
When will this all end?? Please crash, California!!

Comment by Paul in Jax
2008-02-02 10:02:11

Pretty much none of those “luxury” condos on 1st St. are being lived in. It was all spec, which I pointed out during the construction in 2006-early 2007. Most of the owners (I think) are either the developers and banks themselves or locals who already own houses, who are being brought low by the declining equity in their own houses and the baths they are taking here.

Jax Beach is pretty nice. Big deal: it has three miles of the approx. 300 miles of good beaches on Atlantic Coastal Florida.

Was chatting with my plastic surgeon buddy on our morning ride. Business is way off; he doesn’t mince any words about being in a recession. Last chat was a month or so ago - noticed a big difference. Has gone from saying “a little slow” to “slow.”

 
Comment by Lurkeeloo
2008-02-02 11:47:52

Two beach bikes? Woohoo!

Anyone throwing anything else in to a RE deal would definitely scare me off and keep me from looking seriously at it. It tells me they must think it is a crummy deal and the only way to make it work is to market to morons and hope they get lucky.

Comment by Paul in Jax
2008-02-02 12:01:04

I totally agree. You don’t offer things that aren’t relevant to the deal before you even start to negotiate the deal - that’s like something a third-grader would do.

 
 
 
Comment by motepug
2008-02-02 08:57:10

No bubble here, move along

http://portland.craigslist.org/grg/rfs/558333524.html

What a POS

Comment by diogenes (Tampa,Fl)
2008-02-02 09:15:37

Hey! I loved that place! It’s the classic farm house, without the farm. What should it be worth?
Say about $50k, without the upgrades……….so add another $40k for all the finish work……….$89,000. Fair Price.
They just need to drop it by about $200,000.

 
 
Comment by diogenes (Tampa,Fl)
2008-02-02 09:08:39

I think my lengthy post about Jax Beach gotten trashed.
Has anyone seen it? It took 20 minutes to type up.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-02 10:37:46

Look up (LOL)

 
 
Comment by Frank Hague
2008-02-02 09:26:16

http://tinyurl.com/28nedf

“This is a big week in the television rental business. Fliers were slipped under the doors at the Astoria Houses in Queens that urged people to hurry to the Rent-A-Center on Steinway Street so they could have a big new TV for the football game. Among the offers was a 40-inch Bravia, with payments of $47.51 a week. In 117 weeks, the customer would own the set outright, for $5,558.

If this were set up as a loan, the interest rate would be 71 percent and illegal under the usury laws. But this deal is called “rent to own.” In all other particulars it is much like a subprime mortgage for pull-out sofas and television sets.”

I think one of things that contributed to this mania was a general ignorance of basic financial concepts. For a business like Rent-A-Center this type of ignorance seems to be central to their business plan.

Comment by spike66
2008-02-02 10:48:34

“this type of ignorance seems to be central to their business plan.”

Has to be. Right up there with all the 0% interest for a year on furniture or tv sales. Or payday loans. Or teaser rates on mortgages.
In the 2 plus years to overpay for that tv, it will be obsolete.

 
 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-02 09:45:50

This came in my emailbox, interesting:

The United States Government is planning to send out rebate
checks in the hope that American citizens will immediately
spend the money to stimulate the economy, thus avoiding a
recession.

At best, we believe this is a band-aid solution for a broken
system that will not solve the larger economic problems
faced by our country. We believe a short-term fix will not
repair larger, long-term problems. In fact, the short-term
solution may only exacerbate the larger problems.

As such, we have started the “Don’t Buy It!” campaign in an
effort to begin a far-reaching conversation that encourages
people everywhere to “Wake Up & Smell The Rebate.”

Please visit our web site at http://www.simpleliving.net/rebate and
find out how you can participate by using your rebate in
ways that the government does not expect — ways that might
actually make more impact than, as the government hopes,
spending the money to purchase more stuff and junk.

Visit http://www.simpleliving.net/rebate today and learn how you
can print and post flyers about the rebate bribe, start your
own discussion, let others know about the “Don’t Buy It!”
campaign, and more.

Together we can change this stupid economy!

Sincerely,

Dave Wampler
Founder
The Simple Living Network

Comment by Terry
2008-02-02 10:54:43

I think I get this rebate thing. If most people use the rebate to pay down debt, the fed gets what it needs…cash back in the banks coffers, without publicly bailing them out. WoW! a 150 billion boost to the banks. Banks in turn stay solvent on fractional reserve and we merrily go along.

 
 
Comment by dimedropped (Orlando)
2008-02-02 09:50:40

Starbucks is next- Fresh Market having big layoffs in Florida. Free range employees.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-02 10:01:10

I guess coffee is foreclosures.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-02 18:39:14

Lad, that’s truly bad. But funny as H-E-double-hockeysticks.

 
 
 
Comment by fred hooper
2008-02-02 10:05:51

Maricopa County (Phoenix Metro) Notice of Trustee’s Sales
Jan 06 726
Feb 06 687
Mar 06 790
Apr 06 638
May 06 764
Jun 06 797
Jul 06 851
Aug 06 1019
Sep 06 1114
Oct 06 1238
Nov 06 1493
Dec 06 1407
Jan 07 1624
Feb 07 1577
Mar 07 1720
Apr 07 1709
May 07 2007
Jun 07 2325
Jul 07 2501
Aug 07 3248
Sep 07 2834
Oct 07 3458
Nov 07 3544
Dec 07 3875
Jan 08 5334

Comment by bizarroworld
2008-02-02 10:50:19

Looks like things are getting a little out of control with a 40% jump in one month! When I read that Jan 08 number, I had a visual of the train wreck on the Fugitive with Harrison Ford. The feds better get those $600 checks in the mail pretty quickly! This is getting ugly in a hurry.

 
 
Comment by Darrell in PHX
2008-02-02 10:08:08

My company badly missed our 4th qtr numbers. We had 10 big deals just… stop.

CTOs had done RFPs, had done studies and proof of concepts… had all the paperwork done… then, funds cut off.

As our CEO put it, it seems that in December, everyone in our pipeline had a collective “OH Sh__” moment.

Oh course, this triggered an “Oh Sh__” moment for our company too. Every year we do a company all-hands meeting, getting everyone from our Chicago, Austin, Phoenix, and global sales and support offices all together in one place. It was well into the ploanning phase, with location selected, hotel booked, speakers set… then poof… cancelled.

Then, instead of managers having approval for expenses upto $1000, poof, VP apprioval needed for anythinhg over $250.

Instead of planning to add 150 more employees, pooof… freeze on new hiring.

Our major development efforts had been focused on adding major new functionality… poof… now we’re focused on cleaning up some of the small things to allow us to sell more, smaller contracts instead of few, big dollar customers.

That is what a recession smells like!

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-02 10:18:19

Our economy is akin to any old Los Angeles car chase…

The perps start out having a full tank of gas, and towards the end, there’s not much left in the tank, and because a spike-strip was laid down in front of it’s path, all 4 tires are gone, and what’s left of the car, is riding on rims, and leaving a trail of sparks, in it’s wake.

 
Comment by MattR
2008-02-02 12:25:44

No, if this were a recession, you would be hearing about the policy changes from a friend who still works there, because you don’t have a job anymore.

 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-02 10:08:17


I am sick and tired of people making accusation of “phantom numbers” in an attempt to discredit. I juts downloaded fresh data on Wilshire 5000 (Total Mkt Cap). Here are numbers:

Date Close Index Mkt Cap $B

10/31/2007 15,673.4 $19,037.9
1/31/2008 13,896.7 $16,879.8

Change 3M -1,776.7 -$2,158.1

The Mkt Cap loss for the US Scam Market for 3 months ending Jan’08 was 2.1581 TRILLION. Anyone who has better data can post his, or her, data. The RRE data is not yet available and will take 8 more weeks (Case-Shiller for Jan’08).

Jas

Comment by Remain calm. All's well
2008-02-02 10:42:26

People are having PSYCHOLOGICAL difficulties in imagining the magnitude of this contraction. This has nothing to do with data. I wouldn’t take it personally, just as I wouldn’t have taken the RE trolls on this blog two years ago. Like RE buyers, lot of people have ‘bought into’ the equities market. Denial is more convenient than imagining massive losses & taking actions necessary to get out of the way of the freight train. The ride down won’t be without short squeezes and DCBs, but at the end of the day Sheriff Graham-Dodd will ride into this town and bring things back to single digit P/Es.

 
Comment by fred hooper
2008-02-02 11:01:16

You tell’em Jas! If RRE drops nationwide 25%, what’s the big deal if it’s $2T or $3T. Same nightmare, different day.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 15:41:57

I think people are just tiring of your “Rah rah — Greater Depression is on the way” cheerleading, not to mention the appearance that you have some special powers to predict how the mess will evolve going forward.

Comment by CA renter
2008-02-02 17:12:38

I don’t think Jas is “cheerleading” a depression. Jas is trying to warn us and give us information and insight that many might not have.

It’s obvious that a large swath of the population is still in denial about a recession, and many refuse to even consider that we might enter a depression.

I like to plan for the worst and hope for the best. Was reading Jas’ articles years ago, and have yet to see anything fundamentally wrong with what he was/is saying.

Always good to have multiple perspectives at the table, IMHO.

 
 
Comment by Sekar
2008-02-02 18:07:09

That’s about an 11% drop. That’s a correction but not a bear market. And what’s a depression ? 30% ?

 
Comment by Shake
2008-02-02 18:16:51

So this is about a 11% drop. That’s even not even a bear market much less a depression. We’re still in correction territory and the Fed is acting accordingly. They are planning for the worst and hoping for the best.

 
 
Comment by Ria Rhodes
2008-02-02 10:20:49

“Exxon-Mobil reported Friday that it beat its own record for the highest profits ever recorded by any company, with net income rising 3 percent, to $40.6 billion, thanks to surging oil prices. The company’s sales, more than $404 billion, exceeded the gross domestic product of 120 countries.” We’ll keep our children fighting and dying over there, you keep piling on the obscene profits, while keeping your kids out of harms way in the best American colleges.

Comment by Brad
2008-02-02 10:36:15

Oil co. profits run about 5% on invested capital, often less. They could just sell off all of their assets to an Arab sheik and put the money into bonds and get a better return. 5% doesn’t seem so absurd. If they can’t make a fair profit, what incentive do they have to take the risk of searching for new sources, or invest in newer more efficient equipment? And how exactly does Exxon profit from the war?
Americans demand plentiful energy, maybe that is where the problem lies.

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-02 10:41:55

A friend in Oregon was telling me about an article she read that we’re selling some of our oil to China under the radar. Wish I’d asked her for a reference.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-02 10:48:11

The term the article used for the sales was “sub rosa.” An excerpt from Wikipedia (OT but interesting):

The Latin phrase sub rosa means “under the rose” and is used in English to connote secrecy or confidentiality.

The rose’s connotation for secrecy dates back to Greek mythology. Aphrodite gave a rose to her son Eros, the god of love; he, in turn, gave it to Harpocrates, the god of silence, to ensure that his mother’s indiscretions (or those of the gods in general, in other accounts) were kept under wraps. Paintings of roses on the ceilings of Roman banquet rooms were also a reminder that things said under the influence of wine (sub vino) should also remain sub rosa. [1] In the Middle Ages a rose suspended from the ceiling of a council chamber similarly pledged all present (those under the rose) to secrecy.[1]

In current times, the term is actually used by the Scottish Government for a specific type of “off the record” meetings.[1]
In a number of European countries a “sub rosa” remark is deemed to imply sexual innuendo, or at the very least a blow below the belt. More recently, “sub rosa” activities have become a byword for covert operations, usually by security services. Originating primarily in the USA, this meaning has been gradually spreading to other countries and in particular the United Kingdom.

 
 
 
Comment by Bill In Maryland
2008-02-02 10:26:40

Sorry this one’s not about housing. This is about Ron Paul and the clout of him and his supporters. I’m not knowledgeable about the delegate system in party politics. Is it true that the third place finisher can get concessions from one of the two front runners to support his positions if he gives them the delegates? It appears Romney and McCain are very close in their support. I like the idea of Ron Paul getting promises from one of them to veto all new spending and coax Congress to make the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts permanent and makes further tax cuts. I’m in Phoenix for the weekend (yawn, not interested in the superbowl though. I dislike both teams). Weather is great here! Baltimore was lousy on Friday though.

 
Comment by arroyogrande
2008-02-02 10:27:15

Anyone remember the huge S&L crises that happened in the late 80’s? Do you remember how much money it cost to bail out the S&Ls? On estimate I’ve seen is $125B in 1985-1995 dollars. Back then, it seemed like a HUGE amount of taxpayer money to my young mind. That amount would be equal to anywhere between $162B and $232B in todays dollars, depending on how you calculate the inflation between 1985 and 1995.

Today, you have the president, congress, and the senate proposing $146B to $156B (and possibly more) for a ’stimulus package’ to get us out of the current mess. The eventual package seems like it will *already* be in the same ballpark as the S&L bailout.

And now you have Chris Dodd, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, “floating the idea” of creating a new “Home Ownership Preservation Corp.” to buy troubled mortgages and place the borrowers in less costly, refinanced loans and that this proposal should get “serious consideration”.

Wow. It’s funny how much the S&L crisis cost us when put in context.

Comment by Jas Jain
2008-02-02 11:02:37


We had Bush in the White House during the “S&L” and we have Bush during the current banking crisis related to RE (both CRE and RRE) lending. I think that CRE deflation next year would be as bad as RRE deflation.

Jas

Comment by tl
2008-02-02 12:50:41

I hope so! I bought SRS a wee bit too soon last week at 128. It was at the end of the day after the emergency 75 bps cut was announced. I figured (wrongly) that the 75 bps cut would replace the 50 bps cut that was being anticipated the following week. Oops.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 15:38:48

“…S&L crisis…”

One of the leading contenders has a good deal of housing crisis experience, though I have not heard this mentioned during any of the debates so far (too busy arguing about when troops will come home, I guess…)

http://www.telluridenews.com/opinions/x1059366652

Comment by REhobbyist
2008-02-02 17:08:34

Actually, PBear, I remember John McCain being asked in a debate what were his greatest regrets. One of them was being involved in the S&L debacle, and he seemed sincerely apologetic. But it’s funny that he is not contributing to the current debate over the housing crisis, given that negative experience. I think that many Repubs are loathe to say the “r” word (”regulation”).

 
 
 
Comment by Mormon_Tea
2008-02-02 10:30:25

“I am convinced that if the Great Depression had never happened these turkeys would be comparing today with the Dark Ages! Its amazing how some people just cannot get off the depression angle! Things will be tough, but they are never as good and never as bad. Dollar cost average into the market, and you will end up way ahead 10 to 20 years from now.”
Well, Blackbox, let me share a little historical perspective with you. Did you know that economies, societies, nations, and civilizations are at first new, then grow old and weak, and then die, just like flowers, insects, puppy dogs, and your relatives? Did you know that democracies and systems of fiat currency are among the most unstable of human creations? Did you know that an economic depression is just four quarters of negative economic growth?
Did you know that the United States has severe structural imbalances economically? Do you deny that this country is built upon a mountain of debt? Do you deny the balance of payments and trade deficits which have persisted for decades? Do you think they matter? Do you think the fact that the United States has an Air Force, Army, Navy, Marines, and military-industrial complex that can annihilate its opponents, has over the last fifty years influenced the rest of the world in helping us enjoy our rather high standard of living? Do you even allow for the possibility this might end one day? I believe it is a human fantasy to think that everything we enjoy is due to us because we are so clever, hardworking, intelligent, educated, etc, etc. However, terrible periods of adjustment, decay, and despair mark all of human history. Don’t think that this time it’s different because now YOU are on the scene with your own agenda and aspirations. That’s just folly.

Comment by Paul in Jax
2008-02-02 13:29:09

“However, terrible periods of adjustment, decay, and despair mark all of human history.”

So true. The biggest threat to Americans is not that you might lose your wealth and die a pauper, but that the resulting chaos may lead to the very real threat of imprisonment, rape, enslavement and/or torture of your progeny, none of which is at all unusual in the annals of history.

Comment by REhobbyist
2008-02-02 17:14:00

You’re right Paul. We are so spoiled that we can’t imagine the horrors that could happen.

For example, I’m sitting here in the airport (4-hour delay, darn it), watching a young 20-something running around unhinged, spouting the f-word because he missed his flight. Lucky for him he’s being ignored. Nowadays he could get tasered for such behavior in an airport!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-02 17:43:27

Exactly. Real wealth = absence of fear from risk of the dire circumstances you mention. This, IMO, was a big problem in the U.S. during the 1960s-1970s (before R-cans got busy cracking down on crime).

 
 
 
Comment by arroyogrande
2008-02-02 10:41:39

UK Guardian
Banks too slow on mortgage relief-US regulator
http://www.guardian.co.uk/feedarticle?id=7272219

“Federal Deposit Insurance Corp Chairman Sheila Bair said lenders must show “real progress soon” in modifying troubled mortgages.
Otherwise, lenders are inviting a potentially major regulatory and legislative crackdown, she told a Senate Banking Committee on mounting home foreclosures.
Bair’s remarks came as Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, again urged forming a Depression-style federal Home Ownership Preservation Corp to help borrowers keep their homes and refinance into more affordable mortgages.

Bair told the Senate committee that foreclosures remain too high and urged the lending industry to modify more loans on a broad, systematic basis, instead of case-by-case.
She also warned that a new wave of loan problems involving prime — not subprime — borrowers looms in 2009. About $600 billion was lent to prime borrowers for nontraditional mortgages in recent years, Bair said.
Unlike subprime loans that go to borrowers with risky credit, prime loans go to borrowers with good credit.
“Large volumes of these loans will undergo payment reset and require amortization beginning in 2009, in market conditions that may not be much better than we see today,” said Bair, adding that many of these nontraditional mortgages include interest-only and payment-option loans that lacked proper documentation and underwriting…”

 
Comment by Bill In Maryland
2008-02-02 10:59:41

I saw an ad by McCain on Faux News Channel this morning. He described himself as a social conservative. Said nothing about his fiscal stance. Saying nothing says a lot. Of course, I know for a fact he hates cutting taxes. I have a letter from his Washington office to me in 2001 documenting his opposition to the 2001 tax cuts. He’s a democrat really. I see no difference between him and Hillary Clinton.

Comment by tresho
2008-02-02 18:34:43

Sen. McCain is a much nicer person than Sen. Clinton.

 
 
Comment by Talon
2008-02-02 11:31:22

At the moment I’m sitting at Tempe Honda while my trusty Civic is getting an oil change. There are placards all over the place in the showroom with current car loan rates based on various lengths and FICO scores. NOT ONE PLACARD has any rates listed for less than a 60 month loan. Doesn’t anybody pay a car off in 36 months anymore?

Comment by Gulfstream-sitter
2008-02-02 13:31:44

The New/Used house salepeople got their training in the automotive sales industry.

Just another tool to try to sell cars. Nobody thinks about how stupid it will be 5-6 YEARS from now, making payments on a car that will probably have 100,000 miles on it (notice how they always refer to the length of the note in months, instead of years)

Even though buying new works for me (I buy new, get EXACTLY what I want, but hang onto the car for 8-10 years), I decided a long time ago that I was only going to pay a certain percentage of my net income, for a MAXIMUM of four years on any new car.

And that is why I have been out of the new car market since 2001.

That’s okay, because I have found (because people keep bad mouthing American made cars) that you can easily find a low mileage, Cadillac STS or Lincoln LS for thousands less than a new Hyundai or Kia. Or, if you’ve gotta buy German, I recently saw a 2001 7-series BMW, 37,000 miles, had a “little old lady hit the side of the garage door while parking the car in the garage” dent, on one side.

Asking price? 16 grand.

 
 
Comment by NoVA RE Supernova
2008-02-02 13:11:58

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2008/3503monkey_trap.html

Excerpt: “The irony is that the oligarchs are using the fools to help them finish the destruction of the nation. An analogy to this is the Malaysian monkey trap, a narrow-necked container into which the hunter puts a nut prized by monkeys. When the monkey reaches into the container and grabs the nut, his hand with the nut in his grasp is too big to be withdrawn from the narrow neck. All the monkey has to do to escape is release his grip and withdraw his empty hand, but he does not, preferring to hang on to his prize even when the hunter returns to collect him. The real trap is not the container, but the inability of the monkey to recognize the nature of his situation. The same can be said of the money fools who refuse to let go of their fictitious assets.”

Comment by CA renter
2008-02-02 17:30:08

Exactly.

 
Comment by bizarroworld
2008-02-02 19:09:31

Monkey business is a big reason for the current state of economic affairs.

 
 
Comment by fred hooper
2008-02-02 15:35:58

Ben, are you removing certain comments?

 
Comment by Melvin Frumph Hoppe
2008-02-02 17:07:20

I saw it. I don’t know about California crashing around this part o’ Cali.
Bay Area prices are still high, not many houses for sale, and when they do go on the market they sell quick. (East Bay-Berkeley,Albany,El Cerrito). just my observation.

 
Comment by neuromance
2008-02-02 20:19:26

Chris Dodd (D-Conn) proposing direct bailout: http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/31/real_estate/subprime_bailout_proposal/?postversion=2008013117

“Senator Chris Dodd, the committee chair, said he is working to create a Home Ownership Preservation Corporation, which would purchase mortgage securities that are backed by at-risk, subprime loans from lenders and investors…

This corporation would give these lenders and investors a better price for the securities than they would get if the properties backing them were put through foreclosure…

Borrowers could see their monthly costs drop dramatically.”

15-20 billion is a start. But, it’s the camel’s nose in the tent. If it starts, if the HOPC is created and starts taking bad loans off of lenders’ hands, you can bet that it will spiral.

And the lenders won’t learn. They will continue to make bad investments. And borrowers won’t learn either.

Forget about whether this bailout will “work” or not - it rewards the bad investments of lenders and borrowers and will badly undermine the efficiency of the markets.

Do a Google search on “Home Ownership Preservation Corporation” - interesting results follow.

Comment by arroyogrande
2008-02-02 22:17:50

“Pollock also conceded that the program is not without flaws. It could reward some people who bought more home than they could afford, while leaving more responsible borrowers unaided.

Might some of these people be tempted to stop making mortgage payments for a couple of months in order to get a government-sponsored cheaper loan?

“You’re going to have some people going into default to get into the government program. That’s part of the cost you have to reckon with,” he said.”

 
 
Comment by neuromance
2008-02-02 20:24:15

Richard Shelby (R-Alabama) had a good response to the possible creation of the Home Ownership Preservation Corporation:

“It’s not the responsibility, I believe of the American taxpayer to bail out those who for whatever reason have found themselves unable to meet their financial obligations. ”

http://www.pbs.org/nbr/site/onair/transcripts/080131b/

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post