February 9, 2008

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For February 9, 2008

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

325 Comments »

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 04:52:28

IMHO, it is far too early to predict the eventual geographic incidence of the “slowdown, not recession.” The problem is that the boom rolled from the coastal bubble zones and inland to flyover country. It is unsurprising that the bust would follow a similar pattern in its wake.

However, the map which accompanies this article is quite interesting — especially the color-coded list of cities w/ “More than 10% fall” in housing prices:

- Las Vegas
- Las Angeles
- San Diego
- Phoenix
- Detroit
- Tampa
- Miami
- Helena
- Butte
- Boise

The economy
The geography of recession
Feb 7th 2008 | CHICAGO, HELENA, LOS ANGELES AND WASHINGTON, DC
From The Economist print edition
The latest national statistics are gloomy. Yet America’s economic downturn will be felt unevenly
http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10650727

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 05:11:13

I decided not to buy the dip last week.

February 9, 2008 7:07 A.M.EST
BULLETIN
Markets are stuck in a funk
Benchmark indexes all are down more than 4% for the week

Dow losses accelerate with anxiety over the direction of economy. Nasdaq hangs in black.
• Commodities stir the Fed
Rally in crude, gold and wheat will test
central bank’s determination to cut rates.
• Economists hot for more rate reductions
Fed’s Yellen sees slowing, no recession

MarketWatch.com

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-09 05:20:50

I think it’s interesting that the unloved metal, Silver, has been the big winner since the start of ‘08. I know we have a lot of gold bugs out there. Do we have any silver bugs out there? It seems the gold bugs generally thumb their noses at silver and give it the ultimate insult of being, “an industrial metal”. But silver coins sure are pretty.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 05:30:01

Silver has an interesting past as a speculative commodity. You probably already know about this, but just in case others are interested:

The Hunt Brothers and the Silver Bubble
Brian Trumbore
President/Editor, StocksandNews.com
http://www.buyandhold.com/bh/en/education/history/2000/hunt_bros.html

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by BubbleViewer
2008-02-09 06:06:06

I read an article back in around ‘01 by Jim Puplava titled “Silver - Undervalued Asset Looking for a Catalyst”
I remember my first purchase was around $4.50. I have been accumulating steadily, though not in the past six months.
I have 100 oz bars, silver rounds, and junk silver. It’s volatile, but buying the dips has been a pretty good strategy over the years.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by KayLaw
2008-02-09 06:24:59

I’m hoping for a silver bubble. If there another PM bubble I think silver will do well be J6P will find it affordable even without credit. People are buying it up on Ebay, that’s for sure.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-09 07:12:29

Austria has had a Gold Philharmonic coin for years. Now they are coming out with a one ounce silver Philharmonic coin. Thought some of you silver bugs would be interested. Check out http://www.apmex.com

I like silver but I already have 465 ounces of it. The advantage that the rarer gold, or even more rare platinum coins have is more portability. Silver is good for small change. We may end up using one ounce of silver to buy a loaf of bread!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-02-09 08:38:01

That bread should be a dime or two.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 15:01:15

Those philharmonic coins are awesome. Next time PMs tank, I will get some…

 
 
Comment by Melvin Frumph Hoppe
2008-02-09 08:18:27

I buy some silver coins each month now that gold is so expensive. I started buying gold when it was 300 per oz so I’ve done well, just cant get around paying a grand for a coin now. I like the physical coins rather than gold stocks, but am no expert on it. With the dollar shrinking in value, psychologically, I get some ‘comfort’ in the silver and gold coins in these days of uncertainty, although who knows, the prices could go down some day and probably will. Yes they are beautiful. My favorite new coin is the American Silver Eagle-St.Gaudens

http://tinyurl.com/2g9zs2

I bought 40 coins yesterday at $18 a piece here-

http://www.el-cerrito-coin-exchange.com/index.html

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Van Gogh
2008-02-09 15:04:25

As with gold, silver has a true history as money. The old British Pound Sterling was weighed in as a pound of sterling silver and that says enough for me but both India and China have a great history of silver as money as have so many other countries.

The use of gold and silver as currency was called bimetallic currency and the monetary ratio used to be that one ounce of gold was equal to sixteen ounces of silver (currently one ounce of gold trades at about 55 ounces of silver) and some day i think people will get serious about having physical silver in their holdings.

I think it’s the greatest bargain out there as a way out of the Fiat Ponzi Scam and i have bought a bunch and will continue to do so.

When all this breaks down, there is no doubt that silver coins, etc will be a good and sound basis for trading imho.

 
 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2008-02-09 08:22:10

Will all metals get some speculation? What are the metal components of pennies,nickels,dimes,quarters? Yep, I know, it is illegal to deface,melt down,etc. Perhaps if things hit the fan, common metal coins will get scarce due to hoarding….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2008-02-09 09:15:53

Nickels have the most metal value after pre-1982 pennies:

http://www.coinflation.com/

 
 
Comment by sm_landlord
2008-02-09 10:35:12

I own silver miner’s stocks. Doing fine, thanks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by salinasron
2008-02-09 06:28:26

” Fed’s Yellen sees slowing, no recession”

They won’t admit ‘recession’ until they get the employment drop, a lagging indicator this time. Even Cramer got it yesterday early am by his comments. The only out he could come up with was we need to drop the fed funds rate to 1% and he knows that’s not the answer for his banker friends. I loved it after the last rate cut when he said that now things would be ok because the banks could not make more money on the spread and saying to go buy a house now. This a brush with reality moment for some of those on WS, the rest just repeat the mantra feed them from their peers.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-09 06:38:50

The show where he told everybody to go buy a house may have been the low point of the history of Television.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 06:58:28

The low point was around 1939, when we got our first glimpse @ television, at the World’s Fair in New York.

It’s been all downhill, since then.

 
 
Comment by teufelhunden
2008-02-09 07:17:11

Fast forward to 2012:

FB1: “So why are you bankrupt and being foreclosed on?”

FB2: “Because I bought back in 2008, right before the economy and housing market completely collapsed.”

FB1: “Why did you do something that stupid, when housing was already tanking?”

FB2: “Because that Cramer guy on TV told me to…..”

Idiots.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-09 08:08:38

“They won’t admit ‘recession’ until they get the employment drop…”

Agreed. At the same time this is more evidence that the Fed is control of nothing if they are apparently waiting for events to help determine their actions.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by skip
2008-02-09 10:12:05

Of course the Fed themselves control the numbers.

Don’t forget that Reagan was able to lower the unemployment rate by a full 1% in early 1987 by simply redoing the calculation.

Now a days, we have the birth/death model to help figure out the unemployment rate. So much easier to come out with the numbers you need.

 
 
 
Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-09 11:35:00

Larry King had Robert Kiyosaki, Kim Kiyosaki, Gerry? and Dave Ramsey on his show, and Robert Kiyosaki kept repeating over and over again: there is a SALE on Wall Street and a SALE on Housing. He said he was heavy in Stock mkt but he kept urging people listening that now is the time to buy, houses are ON SALE and the Stock market is TIME TO BUY.

I don’t think now is the time for regular Americans making our income. That time is coming.

 
 
Comment by Lip
2008-02-09 06:28:58

“A downturn centred on housing will have pernicious effects, even on the regions it hits least. That is because it constrains one of the biggest safety valves in America’s economy: people’s ability to move. Previous downturns spawned sizeable migrations from recessionary states to booming ones. In the early 1990s, for instance, people flocked from New England to southern states. This time, that mobility is hampered by people’s inability to sell their homes.”

This is key, the house is like an anchor around your neck. Don’t buy one unless you can say, “I think I can live here forever”, because you just might have to. I know many people who are waiting for the right opportunity to put their house on the market. Too bad, too late.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-09 06:54:31

I agree totally, Lip, but I can’t get the sheep to see it. They don’t understand what kind of a burden a house can be. I have a co-worker that works in New York but kept his house in Minnesota. It is eating him alive. To sell it would mean taking a huge hit. He will not just walk away from it. I have told him to walk, if possible. I don’t know what recourse the lender has. In the deal to buy the house he was just looking for a house. I explain to him that he was the only one in the entire transaction that acted in good faith. He trusted the REIC and they screwed him.

I know we admonish the FBs that they should have known better. But should I have to worry about being poisoned every time I bite into a hamburger? Should I have to worry about my brakes failing every time I hit the brake pedal? Should I have to worry about a barber cutting my head off every time I get a haircut? Yes, there is the concept of buyer beware. But there is also the social responsibility that the REIC ignored completely. I have grown to hold no sympathy for them when they did in honest people. My co-worker that owns 6 condos in WPB is a very kind person. Her husband got her into that mess. But I feel much less sympathy for them. They were not acting so honestly.

This meltdown poses many ethical questions for all of us to ponder. I wonder how some of us would react if we were in some of these situations. Would I walk?

Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-09 07:32:06

Actually your colleague in New York with that Minnesota house is in a good situation: He knows how to work / live far away from his primary residence. Many people just don’t want to give up being in their primary residence and miss out on better opportunities. I know plenty of engineering consultants who have a spouse and children and house in a different state from where they work. It’s a lifestyle that takes getting used to. It’s a 5 hour flight from BWI to Skyharbor for me. I do that every 2 weeks or so, no problem. The pay is worth it. I’d make about 35% to 40% of what I’m earning now if I kept myself in Phoenix.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Lip
2008-02-09 07:52:12

Ethics being what they are today, many people will be walking. You, I, and the rest of the HBB family were smart enough, maybe even lucky enough, not to put ourselves in such a financial bind. I own, I can afford it, but I’m still stuck here for the time being.

Last weekend one of my neighbors who bought at the peak, is Heloc’d to the hilt, found that he could rent a larger place for half the price of his mortgage. He’s walking and he told me all of this after knowing him for “30 seconds”. I mean there’s no dishonor for some of these people. To be honest saving $1500-2000 per month would make anyone throw in the towel, I just wouldn’t be telling everybody about it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 06:55:46

Who really thinks more than a few days ahead of time, in our ProcrastiNation?

Comment by SU Guy
2008-02-09 12:11:12

I think Americans think 10 minutes into the future

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 07:08:59

“That is because it constrains one of the biggest safety valves in America’s economy: people’s ability to move.”

Funny — I feel as free as a bird myself. I guess there are some offsetting advantages to throwing away money on rent?

Comment by Blano
2008-02-09 07:43:34

That’s exactly how I feel, now that I’m renting and not buying the house I’m in.

In a few years, when my youngest graduates and goes off to college, I’m free to roam the Earth, even if I don’t. That’s a really nice feeling.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by sm_landlord
2008-02-09 10:43:48

You bet there are offsetting advantages, PB. Moving is difficult enough without turning it into a major financial transaction as well.

As I age, I accumulate more stuff. I dread moving, although I could do so at any time without selling anything or buying something else. But I might have to rent some serious storage space!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-09 14:59:02

I agree and all, but his example was a little wierd.

I would like to be a fly on the wall when the guy in Montana is interviewing the Californian refugee for the copper mining position. Sounds like a sitcom.

Interviewer: You do realize that this job would require you to work outside in the middle of a big dusty hole in the ground?

Refugee: “Totally dude. I need my rays!”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-09 07:23:29

In 2001 in Phoenix there was a big tech recession. Motorola laid of thousands of engineers. I had a consulting contract and my contract ended in early 2002. I wanted as little downtime as possible. Since I was renting, I was very mobile. I got a new engineering contract in New Jersey, put a suitcase, duffel bag, and my laptop computer in my pickup truck, and drove to NJ in 3 days. Started my next engineering contract. Meanwhile back in AZ other consultants who wanted to stay in the area were unemployed for several months. i was earning $60 per hour.

I have been profiting greatly from mobility this decade. Now I’m in Maryland for a few months.

Welcome to “the best career lifestyle of this century” - mobility and no borders. My career has re-energized after I turned 41 in 2000. I have been able to reduce my investing risk significantly, and now can live several years without a job and without dipping into my retirement plans.

Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-09 12:04:22

speaking of laying off, yesterdays info on KODAK was that at one time they employed 21,000 and today 150.
Yesterdays info was that they were getting rid of the instamatic format.
150 people from 21,000.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 16:39:21

What was that stuff they used to make?

 
Comment by Briar
2008-02-09 17:39:29

Where’s the number 150 come from? According to a JobBank article published yesterday, new cuts bring their workforce down to “fewer than 30,000.”
http://www.jobbankusa.com/News/Layoffs/more_kodak_layoffs_in_picture.html

 
 
 
Comment by teufelhunden
2008-02-09 07:30:00

Yes, there is a real misconception in our country, fostered by special interest indoctrination, that houses are assets. Maybe in a good market, and if you have it completely paid off (and bought it for far less than you can sell it for). But the vast majority of the time houses are liabilities, not assets.

The few mortgages I’ve taken out gave me the screaming willies, I was never so happy as the day I got out from under those houses. Why does the majority of the American public fail to see it? Oh well, their education is underway, and the lessons learned this time will last a generation….

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-09 08:18:07

“The few mortgages I’ve taken out gave me the screaming willies”

You said it! I guess goes to show there are two kinds of people:

Those that think paying interest is no big deal, and those who think it akin protracted financial suicide. The only good loan is the loan you pay off early!

Loans are tools - not a lifestyle!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-09 09:03:24

I owned a big custom log house on 25 acres in W. Colorado, beautiful views. Same town as my parents. I had a computer telecommuting job with a company located in a large city. The mortgage was only $1000/month, no ARM, but after two years I sold it. My mom, who’s very security oriented, couldn’t understand it. My dad understood. He could never figure out why I bought it in the first place, he hates mortgages, paid cash for his house. Not two months later, the company I worked for declared bankruptcy. No way would I have found a similar job in that little town. I was SO grateful to not have that house hanging over me. People forget that jobs are no longer like they used to be, the secure job of the 50s and 60s and even 70s no longer exists. People are overly optimistic when it comes to buying things and the long term job outlook.

 
Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-09 09:48:11

I’m with you on that. People who become mortgage slaves are Pollyannish about jobs and forgot the 2001-2002 period when outsourcing became a serious concern. Indians and Chinese are getting paid too little while we Americans are getting paid too much. We Americans are less than 10% of the world’s popuiation but use up well more than 40% of the world’s resources. What kills me is the anti-traders who don’t say it outright, but secretly wish the Indians would go back to wearing rags and the Chinese go back to working on their farms. Everyone on this earth has the individual right to pursuit of happiness without any government in the way. We’ll see more and more countries competing for fewer and fewer resources. Gold and oil are not renewable resources (BTW: I bought a few ounces of gold already this morning - beautiful shiny metal).

 
Comment by mgnyc
2008-02-09 10:00:10

so very true lost in utah

my in laws think it is the 60’s where i should buy a house
and leave myself with like 5k after all is said and done

i just laugh to myself. they are in their late 60’s and early 70’s and do not realize how easily you can be downsized in this new economy

it kills them that we rent.and they even promised to give me a nice chunk of change if we buy.

i told them to keep their money

 
Comment by exeter
2008-02-09 10:05:04

Lost nailed it. Houseownership doesn’t work in a post-industrial economy irrespective if you agree with the fact we’re post-industrial. A house and mortgage narrows your career possibilities to a 50 mile radius max but the majority of folks have themselves locked into that ugly economic reality and living as if it were 1950-1979. To me, we’re seeing the final dislocation associated with a manufacturing economy and that dislocation is people unwrapping themseleves from a 40 year residence in a suburban neighborhood. Either stay in the place you’ve always known and suffer from declining wages/lifestyle or unroot yourself in whatever way possible maintain a standard of living.

 
Comment by mgnyc
2008-02-09 10:12:57

yes exeter and by holding onto a house you limit your mobility greatly

i love the fact i can pack up and go anywhere i want on very short notice if the right position was offered

 
Comment by exeter
2008-02-09 10:41:45

Mgnyc, regarding your inlaws in post above mine… My inlaws and parents are both in their 70’s and 80’s and they just cannot wrap their minds around the reality that what they did back in the 1940’s and 1950’s is impossible today. I even showed them an article that indicated the average time a person is employed by a single employer is 3.2 years. They all worked for 35+years and retired from USPS, public utilites and manufacturing outfits, never seeing but one employer in their entire life. They just don’t get it. Fortunately for me, construction management has been booming for 10 years and at the same time all the veterans are retiring resulting in a shortage of experienced CM’s, resident project reps. And like most companies, most instituted a hiring freeze throughout the 80’s further constricting the availability of qualified folks. I’m prepared for it to end some time but the forecast looks good for the next 5 years. HR managers at Civil engeering firms will all tell you they cannot find qualified guys. And the beauty is there is always an end to every project in the event I happen to be working with a group of bungholes which is the case on the current project. Mar2009 can’t come soon enough.

 
Comment by sm_landlord
2008-02-09 10:50:56

Just for the sake of discussion, allow me to give a different perspective.

Another way to do it, if you can, is to tele-consult. I used to do this, and I currently employ a number of people who do this today. The advantage is that you do not have to physically move, but instead you travel occasionally to the customer site. By occasionally, I mean every three to six months. Customer pays for the travel and hotel, and you do the vast majority of your work from home. Not a bad life, and it can pay exceptionally well.

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-09 11:27:18

I could’ve maybe got another tele job, maybe not. But I was burned out, so I went back into archaeology, where one has to be somewhat mobile. Love it.

 
Comment by SU Guy
2008-02-09 12:34:04

In the future we will all be working when an employer need help. When the project is done there is no need to keep the employee. I see this happening now. This type of business operates differently with heavy profits, no dead weight employees. No paying for fica, ssi, taxes on employees. Companies will employ on a need to basis only. I might not like this trend but this is already happening in our industry.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-02-09 12:41:49

Bulloney Exeter:

What you should have said HR mangers want people who have 5-7 yrs experience and will work for that pay scale, and not 17yrs exp., even though a 17 year experienced person is just as unemployed as the 5-7 one.

Then they hire that Perfect 5-7 yr employee who lives over an hour away, and is late the first 3 days on the job and gets a warning.

Happened last month to my brother HVAC tech, and he lives 1/2 Mile away!!! And he would have gladly taken a 1/3 pay cut form his last job….Hmmm walk or bike to work…

=====================================-
HR managers at Civil engeering firms will all tell you they cannot find qualified guys.

 
Comment by exeter
2008-02-09 13:09:02

aNYC. I know what I know. I have delays in the field because I can’t get a designer in the office to answer RFI’s. The response from design manager is “we don’t have anyone to review”. I say hire someone. “We can’t find anyone” is the response. I’m not a PE and I’m running $35million of work which is atypical in this business. I’m getting calls and emails from old employers for work all over the country. It is what it is.

 
Comment by Anon
2008-02-09 15:17:37

Don’t be conned by this construction engineer shortage BS.

They are looking for someone with 10 years experience in a niche area willing to work for $10 an hour.

If they cough up serious money and/or provide the niche specific job training they would have a pool of dozens if not hundreds to choose from.

 
Comment by exeter
2008-02-09 18:12:43

Not true. Every lead has been in excess of 100k plus $150/day per diem.

 
Comment by NotInMontana
2008-02-09 21:49:06

I answer RFI’s and RFP’s for my software firm and i don’t know anything and the guys who do don’t want to get involved. Rather a trying job for me.

 
 
 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2008-02-09 11:15:52

‘Don’t buy one unless you can say, “I think I can live here forever”, because you just might have to.’

Used sales people never did mention that if you are priced out forever then some folks will be priced in forever. Last thing on mainstream J6P mind now is to make the mistakes that are being reported as of late. Funny how all this coincides in an election year.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 18:09:28

‘Don’t buy one unless you can say, “I think I can live here forever”, because you just might have to.’

That’s why you should always buy low and sell high, especially in real estate. Anyone wise enough and sufficiently patient to wait for a market bottom before buying real estate gets to enjoy the same freedom to move as renters with the added potential for a home equity gain if they are fortunate enough to be able to relocate after the market has rebounded.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Leighsong
2008-02-09 18:56:02

P’Bear,

We are very patient and don’t need to relocate.

Hubby needs locked in the closet every so often, as he is a tad more short on patience! (Especially with all the snow we are enjoying here in WI - lawd what this man would not do for a snowmobile, and he deserves it too!)

I encourage the younger ones to WAIT. They can afford to save and rent, not a big deal.

Some of us…er…middle agers want to have a little fun before the life gets sucked out of us!

LOL,
Leigh ;)

 
 
 
 
Comment by NOVAwatcher
2008-02-09 08:06:39

Interestingly, that data is a little dated. The falls are year-over-year through November 2007.

If you take a look at housingtracker.net, over the past 12 months the median asking price (admittedly not the same as the selling price) has fallen faster in the DC-Metro area (MD, NoVA) than it has in Detroit (-17.6% vs. -17.4%, respectively).

- Las Vegas : -15.9%
- Las Angeles : -14.7%

- San Diego : -18.5%

- Phoenix : -12.7%

- Detroit : -17.4%

- Tampa : -12%

- Miami : -12.3%

- Helena : NA

- Butte : NA

- Boise : -10.4%
- DC Metro : -17.6%

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 10:58:47

Thanks! I submit that the median asking price is a lagging indicator of market value in a falling-price market. (The reason: The gap between asking price and selling price widens as potential buyers’ feet go from cold to frostbitten over the prospect of catching falling knives.)

 
Comment by NotInMontana
2008-02-09 21:51:38

Not sure why Butte and Helena are in there. In the map PB linked, they didn’t show over 10% decline like he said.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 05:00:20

Economics focus
Chain of fools
Feb 7th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Hard evidence that securitisation encouraged lax mortgage lending in America

THERE is a growing consensus that loose credit and too-clever-by-half financial wizardry sowed the seeds of America’s still-deepening economic malaise. One practice in particular has been singled out for censure—the bundling of loans into assets that could be sold on to investors. The charge is that by breaking the link between those who vet borrowers and those who bear the cost when they default, securitisation led to the lax lending that both fuelled and felled America’s housing market.

Securitisation is not new, and decades of standardisation in areas such as mortgage finance, car loans and credit cards have removed many of its deficiencies. But new research* by Atif Mian and Amir Sufi of the University of Chicago’s business school provides hard evidence that securitisation fostered “moral hazard” amongst mortgage originators, which led them to issue loans to uncreditworthy borrowers.

http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displaystory.cfm?subjectid=348876&story_id=10641119

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 05:04:35

Why are the writers at The Economist such a bunch of gloomsters? Don’t they know that America has a resilient economy?

The credit crisis
Financial engine failure
Feb 7th 2008 | NEW YORK
From The Economist print edition

With problems spreading from Wall Street to Main Street, America’s credit crisis will get worse before it gets better

http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displaystory.cfm?subjectid=348876&story_id=10655023

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-09 05:44:49

Why haven’t we yet seen an article on all the opportunities that this downturn will create? Of course, it is because most journalists are morons. But this downturn, which will be severe, should wipe a lot of weaklings off the map. Let’s take one example. I, like many on this blog, watch the homebuilder stocks. These companies are now a disaster. Their balance sheets stink. They flushed money down a sewer hole with massive share buybacks while their stock was high. Most are under the potential cloud of legal action and class action lawsuits. But yet we see one fool after another telling us to buy their stocks. These companies will take right back off they say. Daniel Oppenheim made an a$$ out of himself yet again by upgrading part of this segment.

Why aren’t these same people admitting that the best opportunity in this sector, like many other businesses, will be had by new companies? Companies that start from scratch with no overpriced assets hanging on their balance sheets, no sleazy reputations and no legal issues hanging over their head.

Great opportunities are coming in many industries that have shot themselves in the foot. This includes building, banking, real estate, etc. Find a way to discredit Realtors and provide a better transaction and you will be worth a fortune. Amongst all the manure that has been spread everywhere by the REIC and Wall Street many new flowers may arise. The only way to believe that this is not so is to believe that we are at the end of civilization. I just wish the media which was too bright during the mania would not be so dismal during the bust. They will once again fail to see this situation for what it is. It is a time to discredit those that caused the mess and encourage those that might make it right. I know this is wishful thinking, at best.

Comment by Ben Jones
2008-02-09 06:02:29

It’s not wishful to see opportunity. There are going to be great amounts of money made. New careers, a reshaping of the housing industry.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-09 06:06:56

Ben, the wishful thinking is that the media would understand this and write about it. But once again they are too busy predicting the past to have any understanding of the future.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by JP
2008-02-09 07:31:40

re Opportunity: The meltdown in the tech sector is a case study for money to be made after the wreckage is cleared. The summary of my paragraphs below is: There is indeed opportunity, but it happens first on a small scale because it takes quite some time for the wreckage in the big companies to clear.

The lesson (for me) in the tech bubble is that it took about 3 years for most attitudes to change. I will tell you that it has never really “recovered”: The dinosaurs take a long time to actually go from endangered to extinct. Lucent is a good example; the would have already been bankrupt by now, but they merged with Alcatel, much like two drunks attempting to walk by leaning on each other. (I figure cityboy can relate, given his close relationship to Mr Daniels. :) ) The issue is that you have far too much cronyism in the top levels of large companies (from board to low management), with no real vested interest in the house cleaning that needs to occur.

The only big-company beneficiary for opportunities of the tech wreck that springs to mind is Google. They had a wad of cash and a plethora of engineers willing to work for much less money than during the glory days.

One other outcome: A larger number of small guys who haven’t yet made it big, but are somewhere between hungry and thriving. The rise of the boot-strapped startup is the biggest development of the tech wreck.

 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2008-02-09 06:20:33

as long as the gov dosen’t try to “save jobs”
then we become Japan, w debt

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2008-02-09 09:25:32

you’re right about the rhetoric, although the actual intent is, of course, to save banks … and saving insolvent banks is exactly where Japan went wrong

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-09 15:11:30

“Japan, with debt”

ouch.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 06:06:29

“Why aren’t these same people admitting that the best opportunity in this sector, like many other businesses, will be had by new companies?”

One can hope, but the damage is already done. California’s urban fringes have been turned into a vast sea of ugly cookie-cutter-similar tract home developments.

Comment by aNYCdj
2008-02-09 06:56:22

Here is the BIG psychological question of the decade:

Why did so many millions of people pay exorbitant amounts of money for a plain vanilla house?

——————————————————–
California’s urban fringes have been turned into a vast sea of ugly cookie-cutter-similar tract home developments.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 07:06:41

Agreed — I myself have wondered the same many times.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 07:50:36

Fields of American Dreams…

If they build it, will you come?

 
Comment by Hoz
2008-02-09 08:40:22

They bought because of conformational bias.

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-09 09:09:44

Exactly, Hoz.

 
Comment by edhopper
2008-02-09 09:22:38

I am amazed how people here in NYC think half a mil is still reasonable for a starter home.

 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2008-02-09 09:40:49

Realtors like David Lereah emphasized homes came with cash dispensing HOE-ATM machine.

What’s more, Greenie and the banking industry regularly re-filled said HOE-ATM machine with freshly printed bills.

Beyond that, if you lived in the house for 2 or more years, cash from the HOE-ATM machine was tax free.

 
Comment by mgnyc
2008-02-09 10:09:59

hey ed hopper very true

500k for a crap shack in a marginal area

i don’t care if i do not ever buy a home in nyc area
screw it il rent keep saving and when the time comes
buy my home cash or just build my dreamhome outside
of this overpriced city

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 10:51:33

“They bought because of conformational bias.”

Pretty funny to think it could happen here in California, land of the self-styled nonconformist.

 
Comment by Hoz
2008-02-09 12:58:26

In psychology and cognitive science, confirmation bias is a tendency to search for or interpret new information in a way that confirms one’s preconceptions and avoids information and interpretations which contradict prior beliefs. It is a type of cognitive bias and represents an error of inductive inference, or as a form of selection bias toward confirmation of the hypothesis under study or disconfirmation of an alternative hypothesis.

For example, why do people invest by Dollar Cost Averaging despite the evidence that shows it is an inferior way of investment?

According to Milton Friedman’s optimum utility theory, this should not occur. Therefore there is another mechanism at work. This other mechanism may be the inability to convert information into knowledge.

Once an individual has a firm belief in something, facts are meaningless. A firm belief in deflation, causes all evidence of inflation to be discarded. A firm belief in inflation causes evidence of deflation to be discarded.

The best way to avoid falling into a confirmation bias mentality is to assign negative probabilities. Most people assign positive probabilities. ‘I am buying this house because it will go up in value in 3 years. I’ll be able to sell it for a nice profit to lots of people.’ A negative probability ‘I am not buying this house, because only 7% of the population can afford to buy this house at this price. Who will I sell it to?’

One aspect of confirmation bias is that after taking a position or opinion, it appears that subsequent events are hard wired in the brain. You might as well be speaking ancient Greek to an inuit, it is improbable that you will impart knowledge in an understandable manner. Most HBBers have noticed this when trying to inform friends, family members etal about the risk of buying a house. Invariably the answer is ‘I still wish to buy.’

We are all subject to confirmation bias. The hard part is recognizing our individual biases.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-02-09 19:17:31

WHY ARE YOU SO NEGATIVE….

I have been told that most of my life. You are right on the money Hoz, its assigning (or thinking) about the probabilities of a failure or screwup, people just don’t want to hear about it.
=================
A negative probability I am not buying this house, because only 7% of the population can afford to buy this house at this price. Who will I sell it to?’

 
 
 
Comment by combotechie
2008-02-09 06:11:54

You want the word to get out of what opportunities there are in this mess? Not me; I want it to be kept a secret.
When those who bought at the top are rushing to sell at the bottom, as a buyer I’d rather not have a lot of competition.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 07:19:19

This really isn’t the time to be thinking of new business opportunities, in my opinion.

What’s coming, is a great period of contraction.

Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-09 07:42:13

Remaining footloose and able to work thousands of miles away with little downtime between jobs - that’s even more important than having lots of yellow metal and lots of T-bills. Although I can live without a job several years if I have to, I’d prefer that I won’t have to dip into that emergency fund. To top off this savings, I want to build up another $100,000 or so in VMMXX to get ready for buying opportunities in stocks. It will take at most 5 years of this long distance career lifestyle to get to that point.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by FutureVulture
2008-02-09 15:29:46

Enough with the teasing! Tell me your net worth, dammit, to the nearest dollar! Footloose and willing to travel don’t mean jack unless da boy can show me da big clear finger-rock!!

 
Comment by Dont Know Nothing About Buyin No House
2008-02-09 21:28:49

on the psychology Q: One author in early 2005 attributed house buying boom particially to 9-11. People were frightened, wanted the comfort of home/family and the flight to warm and fuzzy fueled some of the housing boom.

 
 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-09 09:14:03

There were fortunes made during the Great Depression. I wouldn’t be starting any business in the old mold,that’s for sure, but there will be people with an eye for opportunity that will start businesses and make lots of money. Maybe something like publishing books/media on how to survive, that kind of gloomy thing (or how to start a viable business in an economic downturn).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SU Guy
2008-02-09 13:05:59

How about cleaning mold in foreclosed houses. A 2 to 3 day job, costing less than $1000 and you are making 20K to 30K. Mold is Gold (cleanup in foreclosed homes).

 
Comment by NoVa RE Supernova
2008-02-09 15:10:29

My BiL is an environmental engineer in southwest Virginia. Most of his business these days is doing remediation work inside raided meth labs. The average cost: $30K-40K each. Since that’s a depressed area, a lot of the houses (almost always rentals) have to be condemned and torn down, if the LL can’t afford to remediate the meth hazard. He says a lot of these houses had very young children living amongst the highly toxic meth precusor chemicals and residues.

 
 
Comment by mgnyc
2008-02-09 10:28:28

hey aladinsane does that mean i should put that scrapbooking supercentre idea on hold?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-09 10:58:26

Yup, you’d be crazy to do that one, but hows about an armadillo rehab center in Texas?

 
 
 
Comment by WAman
2008-02-09 08:44:20

YES WE CAN!

 
Comment by jbravo
2008-02-09 08:53:12

“Find a way to discredit Realtors and provide a better transaction and you will be worth a fortune.”
You dream.
Though it is a nice dream at that.:)

Comment by not a gator
2008-02-09 09:28:04

I hope someone is listening… 7% is one hell of a commission on a 6-figure sale. Seriously.

(My brokerage only can dream of making that much off me!)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2008-02-09 09:58:12

Opportunites? Buy shoes.

People are going to walk. It’s healthful. It reduces stress and will probably save millions of marriages. What’s more, walking away is tax free! Why pay $3,000 per month for a house you can rent for $1,200? You walk away dot com.

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 07:41:13

I’ve been Reading “The Great Crash 1929″ by J.K. Galbraith…

It’s remarkable how history repeats, even the big player is the same, Goldman Sachs.

The boogeyman back then, was leverage.

It’s a perfect book to be reading, right now.

Recommended…

Comment by mrktMaven FL
2008-02-09 10:01:16

The parallels are remarkable. Financial genius before the fall.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 11:09:11

There is one gargantuan difference though…

The USA had a huge trade surplus in it’s favor, back then.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-09 12:21:55

also The Teapot Dome Scandal. oil
also Desert Queen oil. Mess O Potamia.

 
Comment by Anon
2008-02-09 15:31:10

The boogeyman is still leverage. Ever heard of Zero Down?

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 05:06:25

Finance & Economics
Credit-rating agencies
Restructured products
Feb 7th 2008 | NEW YORK
From The Economist print edition

A beleaguered industry looks to reform itself

HOUNDING credit-rating agencies has become the bloodsport of choice for moneymen. At a conference this week one speaker announced, to raucous laughter, that he had just received a news flash: “Moody’s has downgraded Fitch, Fitch has cut Moody’s in retaliation, and Standard & Poor’s has put itself on negative watch.”

http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10655009

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-09 05:16:19

“On February 4th Moody’s said it was considering a new rating system for structured securities, using numbers, not letters, and a suffix that would indicate the expected level of volatility.”

In an effort to clean up the East River I am going to go and pee in it.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-09 09:17:15

LOL!! Charlie Steen, the Uranium King of Moab, Utah in the 50s, built a mansion on a steep hill above the town. He said it was so he could pee off his deck onto Moab.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 05:22:21

Tiny Firm Gives
Ratings Giants
Another Worry
Mr. Egan’s Ranks Gain Favor as S&P,
Fitch, Moody’s Draw Scrutiny

By AARON LUCCHETTI
February 9, 2008; Page B1

For the past 12 years, Sean Egan has slogged away in offices near Philadelphia, trying to establish his tiny credit-rating firm as an alternative to the industry’s three giants.

His time has finally arrived.

Moody’s Corp.’s Moody’s Investors Service, the Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services unit of McGraw-Hill Cos. and Fimalac SA’s Fitch Ratings are reeling from criticism over the top-notch ratings those firms gave to mortgage bonds that looked safe until the housing market swooned last year. Regulators are probing whether the three companies were too cozy with investment banks. A slew of self-imposed overhauls have been denounced by New York state’s attorney general, Andrew Cuomo, as “too little, too late.”

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120251672233155415.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-09 06:05:14

I have an idea. Let’s get together and start a ratings agency. In all fairness Ben can be CEO of HBB Ratings. This would put the financial system on the firmest footings in the history of the world. I could just see the first ratings report.

“Having reviewed the financial statements of XYZ Company for the year 2007 I have come to the following conclusion regarding their ongoing financial stability. This company is the biggest piece of crap, flaming turd, disastrous clustf–k that I have ever seen. The CEO is a wormy little creature lacking both integrity and knowledge of anything financial. A toy poodle would be prepared to steer this company through the troubled industry waters better than this baboon-ish oaf. Senior Management has been found to be lacking of integrity, thoughtful ideas or anything resembling anything useful in regards to financial acumen. The employees of XYZ Company have proven to be an inbred lot of troglodytes that would be challenged by the prospect of properly setting the clock on a VCR.

Having focused upon all relevant documents and interviews with key figures in this company I hereby give them a rating of “Bernanke”. This is only slightly above the lowest possible rating of “Greenspan” and is a clear indication of XYZ Company’s unfitness and unsound business outlook. I am disgusted that I was ever even asked to set foot in this miserable den of fools. I spit on all of them.

Most Humbly,

Inspector 57 - TXChick”

Now that would be how a ratings agency should act.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 06:21:05

Awesome post, NYCityBoy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Little Al
2008-02-09 06:54:29

Not only funny, but potentially profitable.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-09 09:19:40

You forgot the line “I pee in your general direction.” (Monty Python). LOL!!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2008-02-09 09:30:17

I thought that was “I fart…”

hmm, what’s that smell?

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-09 09:39:27

Yeah, I guess my selective memory has better taste than that…

 
 
Comment by mgnyc
2008-02-09 10:17:30

hysterical

gs downgraded to greenspan today stock may be de-listed

one can only wish

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2008-02-09 12:24:12

Great post NYCityBoy.

Unfortunately to direct, and full of common sense. Wall Street wouldn’t understand the language. Not enough lawyer speak. ;0

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by sm_landlord
2008-02-09 14:27:19

Excellent post! You really captured the humor of this environment. :-)

But many companies regularly file 10Qs that are nearly that frightening, yet the stocks still trade. I think you could put 6″ high bio-hazard warnings right on the stock certificates of many companies and they would still get bid up when the toutz and the bullz are running.

People are Smurfs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by tuxedo_junction
2008-02-09 11:27:18

Weiss, I believe located in Florida, is the other small, independent (subscription fees) rating company.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 05:47:30

Feb 8 2008 6:03am
Focus on rating agencies, at last
Posted by Daniel Altman in Doing the business

Yesterday Standard and Poor’s joined the other two major credit-rating agencies, Moody’s and Fitch, in pledging to revamp certain aspects of their practices. All three have egg on their faces after failing to keep up with the ramifications of the subprime mortgage crisis. But are they all falling inevitably behind the curve?

The big three agencies, which assess the solvency of public companies, were already being bad-mouthed on Wall Street long before the subprime crisis. For example, plenty of bankers considered General Motors and Ford’s debt to be junk long before they were finally downgraded in 2005. You might ask, why don’t up-and-coming rating agencies steal their business by making downgrades earlier and winning the confidence of investors? Well, the companies themselves are the ones who pay for the ratings… and maybe they’re happy for the agencies to drag their feet a bit.

http://blogs.iht.com/tribtalk/business/globalization/?p=649

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-09 08:41:28

Hanky wants to share the rebate the love!

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-09 08:58:38

Whoa! Wrong place for that response - meant to address P.B.’s post further down the line - the one about Paulson going hat in hand (again) to the G7 this time, and asking them to shower their consumers with rebates too.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by oxide
2008-02-09 08:54:57

This is like the pharmaceutical companies paying the FDA to approve their own drugs.

Comment by Incredulous
2008-02-09 10:03:41

Actually, I think they do. How may drugs approved by the FDA in the past twenty years or so have turned out to be deadly, usless, etc.? The FDA is notorious for its cushy relationship with the drug industry, and for the favoritism it shows to particular manufacturers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-09 12:25:32

Botox anyone?

 
 
 
 
Comment by combotechie
2008-02-09 06:21:06

This situation with the rating companies is indeed tragic. All of them had fine reputations that they willingly chose to flush down the toilet.
Their reputations and the trust investors put into these reputations were the true assets these companies possessed. Without this trust these rating agencies are left with nothing.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 06:40:03

“Without this trust these rating agencies are left with nothing.”

I hope some research economists at the Fed are paying attention to your post. They don’t yet seem to grasp the notion of ‘trust’ as a productive asset in the banking system. There are persistent suggestions (borne out by their press releases and policy measures) that all problems can be fixed by fooling games and helicopter drops. Get real. Until trust is restored, nothing is fixed.

Comment by combotechie
2008-02-09 07:14:23

Buffett once spoke of the reputation of Sees Candies and that even if given a hundred million dollars to tarnish Sees’ reputation he wouldn’t be able to do it.
“Only Sees can do that”, he said.

Words of wisdom.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-02-09 09:01:18

Remember when banks used to have the word “Trust” in their name?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 05:14:25

G7 expected to focus on regulation
U.S. calls for more stimulus likely to be ignored
By William L. Watts, MarketWatch
Last update: 11:47 a.m. EST Feb. 8, 2008

LONDON (MarketWatch) — Turbulent financial markets, a potential U.S. recession and fears of a widening credit crunch will give finance ministers and central bankers from the Group of Seven industrial nations plenty to talk about when they meet Saturday in Tokyo.

But U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s hopes to persuade other members to follow Washington’s lead and provide their economies with a fiscal boost appear certain to be dashed, observers said.
“He’ll come back completely empty-handed,” said Trevor Williams, chief U.K. economist at Lloyds TSB Financial Markets.

Instead, officials are expected to talk about the need to ensure regulators are better able to coordinate, providing an “early warning system” that would enable officials to prevent mushrooming crises, such as the subprime debt catastrophe ravaging U.S. and European markets.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/g7-expected-focus-regulation-rather/story.aspx?guid=%7BEA51CDC1%2D7BF1%2D47DA%2D9D3A%2DF18A5C9D0925%7D

Comment by exeter
2008-02-09 10:19:18

Oh noes!!! Not big bad regulation!!! The world must be coming to an end!!!!!

 
 
Comment by NoVa RE Supernova
2008-02-09 05:18:59

http://www.larouchepub.com/pr/2008/080207mtgge_workouts_fail.html

Mortgage ‘Workouts’ Overwhelmed by Rising Foreclosures

p.s. - Good morning, Professor Bear!

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 05:25:11

Do you only trust Larouche as a source?

Comment by palmetto
2008-02-09 06:28:10

I read somewhere that someone in the CIA said that LaRouche had the best private research team on the planet. No joke.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 06:48:33

I guess if you read it somewhere, then it must be so. Perhaps that explains why RE SuperNova so heavily favors Larouche as a reliable information source on difficult questions such as whether hyperinflation is underway.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2008-02-09 07:02:47

Sorry, not the CIA, but NSC. From a Wikipedia entry.

In 1984, LaRouche’s research staff was described by Norman Bailey, a former senior staffer of the National Security Council, as “one of the best private intelligence services in the world.”[4]

 
Comment by NoVa RE Supernova
2008-02-09 13:52:17

LaRouche forecast the debacle in Iraq and strongly warned, unlike George “Slam Dunk” Tenet, that Bush’s neo-con handlers were making a horrific strategic blunder.

 
Comment by NoVa RE Supernova
2008-02-09 14:17:36

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2008/3502debt_crisis.html

LaRouche has some brilliant minds working for him, most notably John Hoefe and Richard Freeman. Their track record on the housing bubble, the credit crisis, and the next mega-shoe to drop - the $50 TRILLION dollar off-balance-sheet derivatives implosion - speaks for itself. Both take extremely complex subjects, like the securitization of mortgages, and write in such a way that even my mother-in-law can immediately grasp the subject matter and its implications. That takes talent.

 
 
 
Comment by NoVa RE Supernova
2008-02-09 13:48:54

Hardly. But he’s such a maligned figure (when he’s mentioned at all by the MSM) that the first-rate analyses he and his staff produce has a very limited distribution. While I don’t agree with some of his proposed solutions, LaRouche’s economic forecasting has been brilliant, and invaluable to me as an investor (and worth every cent I’ve paid for subscriptions to his publications such as Executive Intelligence Review).

If I didn’t post these articles in here, most of you would never see them. Many of the other news sources I trust are widely cited by other posters, so I feel no need to duplicate their efforts.

 
 
 
Comment by NoVa RE Supernova
2008-02-09 05:20:19

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2008/3506fed_pumps_hyperinflation.html

Foolish Fed’s rate cut pumps hyperinflation

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 05:26:22

There is no hyperinflation in the U.S. at the moment, and anyone who claims there is has no credibility.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-09 05:50:01

Manhattan is very expensive, as we all know. But for those of us that don’t drive and don’t heat a home, inflation has not been too pronounced. I see food prices going up but you can still eat relatively cheaply. Liquor prices are going up but you can still find good deals on Happy Hours. Here and there I can see price increases but definitely not hyper-inflation. If I lose my job then even 1% inflation is too high. I think job loss, right now, is a much greater risk than inflation.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 07:12:44

Professor…

I would define food prices as being certainly inflationary, but not hyper-inflationary, at this point in time.

Once you cross the Rubicon from inflation to hyper-inflation, there aren’t any word definitions that describe anything beyond hyper-inflation.

It can be moderate (Argentina 2001-2002) or utterly ridiculous, (Zimbabwe, present-day) but both instances are called the same.

Hyper-Inflation

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 07:28:07

“Once you cross the Rubicon from inflation to hyper-inflation, there aren’t any word definitions that describe anything beyond hyper-inflation.”

Images serve nicely to describe the latter…(not sure if the money these kids are seen playing with dropped out of helicopters or was delivered by land?)

http://wildthing.co.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/weimar2.jpg

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 07:45:44

Pyramid $cheme?

 
Comment by not a gator
2008-02-09 09:33:42

Weimar, Argentina, Zimbabwe …

Aren’t we forgetting one?

Revolutionary America.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 09:55:28

Yugoslavia in the 1980-1990’s was more out of control, than present-day Zimbabwe.

 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-02-09 10:27:34

Sorry Professor…you are VERY wrong on this one

Inflation is pretty HIGH, lots of product downsizing and small price increases to mask the 10% or more real inflation rate

But then I have always shopped for food and know how to cook. Very rarely do i eat fast food, and only eat out with the GF when i get a 2 for 1 coupon. She is just as frugal as i am….

Have you noticed ALL antifreeze is now a 50/50 mixture with water, just a few years ago 100% A-F was $5.99 a gal, now 50/50 is $8.99……..NO inflation….come on Professor….open your eyes,please.

Comment by Central Valley Guy
2008-02-09 11:58:13

Dude, you’re basing your analysis on antifreeze?
Isn’t a Big Mac still a buck?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by NoVa RE Supernova
2008-02-09 13:57:36

I don’t think anyone would dispute that we’ve seen big run-ups in commodity prices, not to mention real estate or medical costs, over the past several years. I would agree that we haven’t seen hyperinflation “at the moment,” but with all of the liquidity being pumped into the system by the Fed, and the runaway M3 money supply, we have a lot of the preconditions in place for the Fed to inflate its way out of its obligations - in other words, to create hyperinflation.

 
 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-09 15:25:30

Why do economics jump straight from inflation to hyper inflation?
Aerodynamics defines the supersonic regime between subsonic and hypersonic. Why not superinflation?

The only problem with going from inflation to superinflation is traversing the shock wave. And recognizing the fundamental shift in properties once the money becomes compressible.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 05:23:29

Prosecutors Widen
Probes Into Subprime
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Seeks Merrill Material;
SEC Upgrades Inquiry
By AMIR EFRATI, SUSAN PULLIAM, KARA SCANNELL and CRAIG KARMIN
February 8, 2008; Page C1

Federal criminal prosecutors are stepping up their interest in Wall Street’s mortgage-securities activities.

The Justice Department’s U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan, based near Wall Street, has notified the Securities and Exchange Commission that it wants to see information the agency is gathering in its investigation of Merrill Lynch & Co., according to people familiar with the matter. The SEC is examining, among other things, whether the securities firm booked inflated prices of mortgage bonds it held despite knowledge that the valuations had dropped, the people say.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120244312394153109.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Comment by will
2008-02-09 06:10:15

These guys are so busted. I am sure the FBI will find smoking e-mails. They probably did not think they would get caught b/c every one was doing it.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 06:22:13

You must be referring to the “Too Big to Jail” doctrine?

Comment by yensoy
2008-02-09 07:58:09

Brilliant :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-09 06:26:25

Will, I keep wondering how many of these little tycoon punks have hung themselves with their Blackberries. Wouldn’t that be poetic justice?

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 07:26:24

Merrill Lynch: Bullish, in jail?

or maybe they’ll be squealing pigs?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by spike66
2008-02-09 08:01:10

“the FBI will find smoking e-mails.”

Maybe, maybe not. When I was still working at Morgan Stanley, there were a number of meetings on the subject of emails, and what information should be contained therein,and what should be conveyed verbally, in person, and I was no honcho. Spitzer was still AG and running ibank investigations.
Also, note the White House for example, keeps “losing” emails.
Corps. are very aware of the email trail, and at least at MS, have been working for years to make sure that trail is as limited as possible.

 
 
 
Comment by NoVa RE Supernova
2008-02-09 05:25:52

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2008/3506bloomberg_putsch.html

Felix Rohatyn and George Shults Drive Bloomberg’s “Beer Hall Putsch” - how the financial oligarchy intends to install Bloomberg as our next President.

Comment by palmetto
2008-02-09 07:20:43

LaRouche is often dismissed as a “conspiracy theorist” and while I don’t agree with his political views, I can’t fault his research. I didn’t know much about him until a few days ago, when I got interested in Sir Jimmy Goldsmith as a result of a conversation with a friend. Looking up Goldsmith, I got interested in LaRouche. LaRouche has been marginalized, for sure, but he has gone up against some global heavies, so it doesn’t surprise me. A member of my family was acquainted with Rohatyn, who indeed does have international/European finance ties (Lazard Freres). I wouldn’t be surprised if what LaRouche has outlined actually came to be. I’ll be watching with interest. I read a small book called “The Merchant Bankers” when I wuz a pup. These financiers have a centuries-old tradition of interfering with countries at every opportunity. One of their greatest tricks is to stir up unrest between two countries and then lend money to both sides to finance ensuing wars.

Comment by NoVa RE Supernova
2008-02-09 14:08:04

The opinion-makers dismissing LaRouche has a “conspiracy theorist” happen to be owned by the very same corporate cartels who’s toes LaRouche stepped on. His trial and imprisonment in the ’80s was one of the most blatant political railroadings since Stalin’s show trials of the 1930s. One of LaRouche’s associates, Michal Billington, who refused to cut a deal with prosecutors and go along with trumped-up charges against LaRouche, was sentenced to 77 years in prison for - get this - “Securities Fraud.” Michael Milken, who really did commit securities fraud on a massive scale ($900 million) spent less than three years in prison by constrast. That should tell you something about the nature of our “Justice” system.

 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
2008-02-09 05:25:54

My barber says his business is up as peeps are getting “interview cuts.”

Comment by mgnyc
2008-02-09 10:24:24

i see my barber every other saturday

my barber a russian immigrant is a really nice hardworking guy

he started his own shop after working for others for a decade and saving his $$$ ($10 haricuts) that is alot of work!!

he bought a home fixed it up and has a 5.5 30yr fixed
he has great credit and put 2 kids thru college

a barber? yes and many more well educated americans cannot balance a checkbook

good for him and his family they are living the american dream

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 05:38:58

I concur it is not Fair to blame Isaac’s Company for the credit mess. No matter how great someone’s past credit history or their apparent financial stability, if you make them a loan at a sufficiently outrageous multiple of their permanent household income, they are unlikely to ever repay it.

Commentary
Morning Buzz Archive
FICO: Don’t blame us for mortgage mess

The CEO of Fair Isaac, the company behind the FICO credit score, stands by his company’s credit scores but sees more pain ahead for consumers.

By Paul R. La Monica, CNNMoney.com editor at large
February 8 2008: 4:25 PM EST

Dr. Mark Greene, the CEO of Fair Isaac, said that his company’s FICO credit scores are not to blame for the mortgage meltdown.

The mortgage meltdown is hurting credit score provider Fair Isaac. The company warned in January that 2008 profits would miss forecasts and the stock has taken a huge hit.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — If you’ve applied for a mortgage, auto loan or credit card recently, then you’re probably intimately aware of what your FICO score is.

Banks rely heavily on these credit scores to determine whether or not to give consumers a loan. And as Wall Street and Main Street sort through the mortgage mess, people are looking for scapegoats.

Some have argued that the company behind the FICO score, Fair Isaac (FIC), as well as other companies that provide credit scores, such as Equifax (EFX), Experian and TransUnion, are partly to blame since their credit scores could not accurately predict subprime default risk.

Greene maintains that credit scores are only one way to judge a borrower’s creditworthiness.

He said the banks with the most problems with mortgages are those who relied solely on credit scores and failed to look at the other two of what he dubbed the “three Cs”: collateral and capacity to repay.

Along those lines, Fair Isaac is also rolling out in May something that it calls a Credit Capacity Index. That will help banks determine how much additional debt a prospective borrower can handle.

These products may help lenders do a better job of gauging the creditworthiness of prospective borrowers. But unfortunately for Fair Isaac shareholders, it’s unlikely to lead to a turnaround in the company’s fortunes anytime soon. The mortgage crisis is taking its toll on Fair Isaac’s sales and profits.

http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/08/markets/morningbuzz/?postversion=2008020810

Comment by GotRocks
2008-02-09 06:55:43

Now if Fair Issac was in the business of insuring loans or making loans, maybe there would be some blame on them. One of the nice things about credit scores was that they didn’t include your income, they only tried to figure out whether you had a reasonable history of paying people what you owned. In other words, they NEVER tried to assess whether Sam, down the street, could make payments on Rockefeller Center, they only tried to figure whether Sam would TRY to make payments, were he to buy Rockefeller Center.

They REASONABLY assumed that lenders would check on the income potential of any borrower, along with other things (like assets and whether the house was in Naples). Heck, I doubt if Fair Issac had any clue what loans particular individuals were applying for…and if they did, then they probably would have been breaking the law…and why should they have cared.

In the end, it all goes back to the credit rating agencies, they gave everyone else in the REIC the cover they needed, so they could all blame someone else. If they had pulled a few loan documents, just a few, from bubble areas and looked at what was there, they would have NEVER given the papers investment grade ratings (assuming that they had any integrity). Since that was their job, it is simply time to jail those people, or ask China to take care of them.

For the others who had access to the information (banks, investment houses, mortgage brokers, etc.) and did not make any effort to stop this insanity, pulling licenses would be a great start…we need at least semi-honest people in this business, or we’re as corrupt as any 3rd world country…and there actually are a lot of honest people in this country (or we wouldn’t have made it to where we are now), they just didn’t
find their way into this business.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 07:19:55

“They REASONABLY assumed that lenders would check on the income potential of any borrower, along with other things (like assets and whether the house was in Naples).”

Exactly. As a related point, I would add that many FBs REASONABLY assumed that lenders would not make loans to a borrower with no hope of repaying the money.

Comment by GotRocks
2008-02-09 07:29:38

Excellent point too. I’ve always had a degree of sympathy for many of the FBs. These people may know how to safely handle 20 tons with an overhead crane, but understanding mortgage documentation is often not their specialty. They grew up in a world where loans were made only to people who had a reasonable chance of paying back…if the loan was too much for you parents to afford, they simply didn’t get access to the money or that house - that simple.

So when they’re told by EVERYONE they come in contact with tells the “sure, you can afford that $350k house on your $60k income” and the starting payments are maybe $1100/month, then it’s tough to blame them for thinking it’s ok.

Of course Casey and other speculators are a completely different story.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2008-02-09 12:02:57

I agree with you Professor Bear ,but in the cases where the borrower submitted a fake income ,that borrower was in the business of committing fraud in order to get a perceived gain .
How can a borrower who went on a stated income loan ,who inflated their income ,claim that they expected the lender to make sure they qualified ? I just would like to know ,what % of borrowers were liars verses borrowers who truly thought they must of qualified for the loan . I know the loan agents pulled a lot of s-it ,but how many borrowers knowingly went along with that loan application foul play ?

During the mania ,apparently a certain % of borrowers did not care if they could qualify or not and the objective was simply speculation opportunity with little money to put up . I keep thinking about the way homes were sold during the mania as a no risk ,real estate always goes up , easy money maker ,your a fool if you don’t buy .

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 05:43:40

DJ US STOCKS OUTLOOK: Credit Crunch Heads For Worst-Case Scenario

For months the stock market has sold off due to worries that contagion from the “subprime” mortgage market could spread, with defaults showing up in prime mortgages, credit cards and corporate loans and potentially elsewhere in the financial system.
Recently, many of those “worst-case” scenario fears have materialized, raising the possibility of a bear market. People with many different credit profiles are missing payments on everything from home loans to credit cards and spreads on corporate debt are widening, indicating fears of default.

Late Thursday, Moody’s Investors Service issued its first downgrade of a triple-A bond insurer, cutting the financial strength rating of SCA Capital. Many investors view the bond insurers as a vital link in the financial chain that’s under pressure from the credit crunch. If these companies, which have insured much of the risky debt on banks’ balance sheets, see their credit ratings downgraded, the banks could be left holding the bag on defaulted loans. Even without defaults, the banks could have to mark down the value of debt further because of ratings predicated on the bond insurance. In an interview with Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank Chief Executive Josef Ackerman said downgrades could trigger a “tsunami-like event.”

http://wiadomosci.onet.pl/1689022,10,dj_us_stocks_outlook_credit_crunch_heads_for_worst_case_scenario,item.html

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-09 05:55:56

“DJ US STOCKS OUTLOOK: Credit Crunch Heads For Worst-Case Scenario”

Or for those of us that have held money on the sidelines, due to the thought that stocks were overpriced, this would be the best-case scenario.

In the last 3 years it appears to me that all stock rallies have been due to M&A, LBOs, Fed gimmicks, government promises and short squeezes. I can’t remember seeing a rally since late 2005 that was based on anything else. That would tell me that every rally has been a phony rally. Prices have plenty of room to drop. At Dow 9000 or 10000 I might move my 401k money back into stocks. Oh, I know there are those that say you can’t time the market but every so often an event arises that is easy to see. Wait for the demise, being ever so patient, and move back in after the destruction. We have now had 2 such events in the past 10 years.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-02-09 06:59:02

The people who claim the timing part don’t seem to be seeing that US monetary policy since 1981 seems to be blowing ever larger bubbles.

Well, there’s no other asset class large enough to inflate. Hence, the end.

Comment by exeter
2008-02-09 10:16:41

Hmmm….1981? To think I was criticized right here on this blog for suggesting 1981 was the start of this plastic, hollowed out BS economy. Thank you for the vindication.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by GotRocks
2008-02-09 07:00:06

Yea, this one was staring us all in the face. I looked a few loan documents in Florida (that I could pull up from county records) and immediately started shorting any company that showed up.

It’s the only time in 4 tries that I made money in the market and it was too easy.

 
Comment by DannyHSDad
2008-02-09 07:12:11

And then there are those of us who are short overall and doing quite fine, thank you very much. I was almost all cash since the beginning of 2001 (so, against S&P500 I didn’t do too badly) but the housing bubble reinflated the stock market in ways I didn’t understand until I started reading blogs like this in 2005 (I was living in Austin TX 95-06 and we didn’t have the housing bubble until 2006-2007 or so, just after I left the area). The August’07 credit problems convinced me to start shorting the market (I have been buying ETF’s like SH, QID, DXD and SRS, since then). I’ve been advising friends to get out of stocks and watch out for MMF.

Looking back, I was a little early and Q4′07 wasn’t so hot but now I’m more sure than last summer that things will get worse. The eye opener for me was Bristol-Myers Squibb confessing their cash problems.

Looking back, over 2 years ago, on this blog, I had expressed my expectations for municipals (a very real problem now) and gov employees (slowly becoming a reality) and retirees (not in the news yet, but will be soon with MMF and bond issues and lower stock returns) suffering from the post-bubble fall out (along with home builders and RE related jobs) but I didn’t anticipate how much financial companies will suffer and even non-financial companies with their cash holdings. Nor the global extent of the housing pain exported to the rest of the world (villages in Norway suffering was another eye opener).

I don’t know what the fix will be but unless we get hyperinflation (with rising wages to finally afford the overpriced homes), I don’t expect the housing nor the stock market improving any time soon, in spite of the stimulus package. For now, people are still optimistic about the stock market the way they were with housing in 2005-2006 (and maybe even 2007) with repeated mantras like “historically stock goes up 10% annually.” Sigh.

Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-09 10:10:42

I agree with PXP and SRS. However I like the 16% yield of PGH (Pengrowth, which is an oil trust and not an ETF).
I’d keep an eye on aging boomers and retirement. Many of them have little savings and too much overinflated real estate, so they will have to postpone retirement. My sisters are in their 50s and none of them even thinks of retiring - they will work until they drop. I’m 48 and anticipate working another 20 years, then downsizing my job after that and continue working where I want to live. Retirement is for cows.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tuxedo_junction
2008-02-09 12:26:42

Are you sure about the yield? Energy trusts are depleting assets. The cash-on-cash yield includes return of capital. Investing in those trusts are like purchasing an amortizing loan. At the end of the investment’s life the residual is 0.

 
Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-09 15:01:04

PGH Dividend: 2.73, Friday closing price 17.34. Yield is thus 15.74%. Close to 16%. Granted there are higher taxes on this trust, but it’s miniscule. I’m still netting double digit yield after the taxes.

 
 
Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-09 10:17:52

oops - mea culpa. I checked out pxp instead of dxd. Looks like you are extremely bearish on equities. My retirement plans are all in equities and have been that way since 1989. Let’s see: recession of 1991, stock crash of 2000, recession of 2001. And my average rate of return is over 10% per year since 1989. I think it’s foolish to time mutual funds or stocks as a whole. But you can buy individual stocks low.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by FutureVulture
2008-02-09 16:17:24

What Hoz said (about confirmational bias).

Why do you call it “buying low” when it’s individual stocks, but “timing” when it’s a whole market? The same basic principles apply. Things like Q ratio and 10-year P/E can be used to value a broad market. You need to get this “can’t time the market” mantra out of your head. You can VALUE a market. And today’s U.S. market is still way overpriced, so unless you’re good at stockpicking, you should lean away from U.S. stocks. Fair value on the S&P 500 is probably south of 1000.

 
Comment by DannyHSDad
2008-02-10 01:30:12

OK, it’s probably dead topic but looking at:

http://stockcharts.com/charts/historical/djia1900.html

things can go bad for 2 decades or so (29-54 is what I have in mind). I believe that we’re just getting started the downward leg as economic reality gets reflected in the companies’ earnings and the investment psyche changes to be bearish. I don’t know if it’ll take 3-4 years to hit bottom but I don’t see us hitting the stock lows in the next few days and be over with….

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 05:50:53

Real Estate
Mortgage Meltdown Archive
Homeowners: Can’t pay? Just walk away
More and more borrowers are watching their house values sink while the cost of their loans skyrockets. What to do? Skip out on the mortgage all together.

By Les Christie, CNNMoney.com staff writer
February 7 2008: 2:04 PM EST

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Mortgage payments are set to jump. Home prices have plunged. “I’m outta here.”

http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/06/real_estate/walking_away/index.htm?postversion=2008020714

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 06:01:49

lenders = deserving bagholders

Beyond anecdotes, some statistics indicate that hard-pressed owners are deliberately courting foreclosure. An analysis by the consumer credit rating agency Experian last spring found that many borrowers were choosing to pay off credit card and other consumer debt before making mortgage payments. They were electing to put their mortgage at risk rather than their credit cards or auto loans.

Similarly, Richard DeKaser, chief economist for National City Corp., (NCC, Fortune 500) notes that while all credit metrics are deteriorating, mortgage delinquencies are rising disproportionately. “That makes sense if people are choosing to walk away,” he said.

And now reports are emerging of homeowners skipping out on mortgages even though they can still afford to pay them.

Wachovia (WB, Fortune 500) CEO Ken Thompson described these people on an earnings call last month.”[These are] people that have otherwise had the capacity to pay, but have basically just decided not to, because they feel like they’ve lost equity, value in their properties.”

Lenders are afraid that borrowers may find it’s worth the hit to their credit scores, if they can drastically reduce their housing expenses. Someone with good credit and a $600,000 home in a town with cratering real estate prices could buy a similar house nearby for $450,000, and then let the other $600,000 mortgage go into foreclosure.

Comment by spike66
2008-02-09 06:18:44

I think this walk away strategy is the best thing that could happen. Those involved make a business decision to cut their losses and return the house to the bank, per their mortgage contract. The houses will sit vacant, driving down prices for the remaining houses in the neighborhood, putting more mortgage holders underwater. Declining prop tax revenues and cutbacks in public services and public employees will cause public anger. The ballooning inventory of houses owned by the banks will continue to lose value…then it’s either unload ‘em or be insolvent.
The walkaways are the best hope for a faster crash.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 06:24:16

“The walkaways are the best hope for a faster crash.”

Right — we should all be grateful for tax relief on short sales, which serves to encourage walk-aways.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by spike66
2008-02-09 08:11:53

“tax relief on short sales, which serves to encourage walk-aways.”

Tax relief is only for short sales…with the banks overwhelmed, and understaffed, and still reluctant to cut prices, more FBs will just walk, rather than be bled dry slowly. The FBs still get hung for the taxes, but the income stream to the banks is cut off. Fair enough.

 
Comment by sd renter
2008-02-09 08:42:02

What is the real story on tax relief for short sales? I heard a few conflicting things from people in the industry.

1. It already passed
2. It is pending in legislation.
3. It passed and it only applies to owner occupied homes.

Can someone help?

Thanks
George

 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2008-02-09 10:19:35

It passed under HOPE NOW.

The Mortgage Debt Relief Act excludes from taxation discharges of up to $2 million of indebtedness that is secured by a principal residence and was incurred to acquire, build or make substantial improvements to the taxpayer’s principal residence. While the determination of a taxpayer’s principal residence is to be based on consideration of “all the facts and circumstances,” it is generally the one in which the taxpayer lives most of the time. Therefore, vacation homes and second homes are generally excluded.

Moreover, the debt must be secured by, and used for, the principal residence. Home equity indebtedness is not covered by the new law unless it was used to make improvements to the home. “Cash out” refinancing, popular during the recent real estate boom, in which the funds were not put back into the home but were instead used to pay off credit card debt, tuition, medical expenses, or make other expenditures, is not covered by the new law. Such debt is fully taxable income unless other exceptions apply, such as bankruptcy or insolvency. Additionally, “acquisition indebtedness” includes refinancing debt to the extent the amount of the refinancing does not exceed the amount of the refinanced debt.

The Mortgage Debt Relief Act is effective for debt that has been discharged on or after January 1, 2007, and before January 1, 2010.

http://www.cshco.com/index.lasso?node=2&pgID=108&set=article

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-09 15:37:37

Given the refi activity boom recently, why aren’t banks staffing up and going after the monied walking people with recourse loans? They could conceivably make more money back this way than in workouts (depending on how expensive the legal system is, however.)

 
 
Comment by combotechie
2008-02-09 06:31:49

I, for one, don’t wnt a faster crash. I’d like to see the decline a gradual one, a mirror image of the rise.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MD_Renter
2008-02-09 06:44:03

The rise was pretty steep in some places.

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-02-09 07:03:19

I want a spectacular crash and see the morons crash and burn.

Incidentally, that’s better for the economy too otherwise you are going to see a zombie economy with no one investing in anything.

 
Comment by Diggs
2008-02-09 07:03:21

I would consider a mirror image of the rise, a pretty fast crash.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 07:12:11

Let’s see — 23% rise year-after-year in LA-area prices would have to be offset by a year-after-year
(1/1.23-1)*100 = -18.7 pct drop. Is this what you mean by “mirror image”?

 
Comment by combotechie
2008-02-09 07:48:25

An 18.7 % drop in one year can be digested, so yeah, I consider that a mirror image.
But if everyone, buyers and sellers alike, woke up Monday morning and suddenly, all at once, discovered what their house is REALLY then the market would freeze up.
I’d rather have this price discovery process take its time with an orderly adjustment.

 
Comment by combotechie
2008-02-09 07:49:41

“REALLY” = “REALLY worth”

 
Comment by Sniggle
2008-02-09 09:24:41

The moron may actually be those of us who played by the rules.

In hindsight, I could have extracted a few hundred thousand from my house, lived free for the last several years, taken the interest deduction from my taxes, and then just walked away minutes ahead of the sheriff conducting the eviction. Makes me almost wishI lacked a sense of responsibility.

And as has been pointed out here often, the government is rushing to help those that scammed the system while the responsible are left to pay for the bailouts.

 
Comment by oc-ed
2008-02-10 02:24:12

Sniggle,

I think that is the aspect of the moral hazard objection that has been forgotten. Those of us who played by the “rules” now see that the “rules” we adhered to are being ignored by our government. This leave me with significantly less loyalty to this governing body. While it may have always been best for me to have more loyalty to myself that my country, it is definitely now the case for me to act in my own self interest first and push any sense of following the “rules” the gov to second. I say this in terms of finance/taxes. In essence I am taking a F-U position with state and federal gov in terms of money. It’s mine and you take it from me under duress. What they have done is a form of taxation without representation. I may not be alone.

 
 
 
Comment by GotRocks
2008-02-09 07:13:04

Well, dahhh. It’s so obvious that they’re doing the right thing it’s hard to come up with an analogy, but I’ll try:

Let’s say that you buy a big new car for 30K with a loan at 100%. Next month, Governor Perry (here in Texas) decides to slap a 50 cent per mile toll on big cars (he snuck the GPS transponder into cars for tracking when you were too busy complaining about ATM fees and worrying about Britney). Instantly, your car is worth 15k and costs a ton to operate, but you have the option of returning it to the dealer with the loan forgiven…so you can go out and buy a small car that still meets your needs, with no per-mile toll (yet), only drawback is that instant credit from The Dump is no longer available (yes, insurance goes up too, due to credit score, but most people don’t know that at the time). It’s not a very tough decision, especially when you’re bank account is running dry and your credit cards are about to max.

 
Comment by IllinoisBob
2008-02-09 09:26:11

Hold the phone! The logic of keeping current on your CC dept, and letting go of your house will have some unintended consequences! You go into foreclosure & trash your credit = CC company hiking your interest rate to the MOON. And don’t even THINK you will get qualified for a new loan for that bargain priced home. Maybe in ‘03 - ‘06 but NOW?

Comment by GotRocks
2008-02-09 09:36:41

But what are the choices if something has to give. By not paying your home loan for 6 months, maybe more, prior to being kicked out, you free up a ton of money to pay down credit cards - you then live in an apartment and you’re probably breaking even. The other option is to stop paying credit cards and declare bk. The problem with that is you become a slave to your creditors for the next 5 years because of Ch. 13 of the code (i.e. every spare dollar you make beyond what a court thinks you need to live on goes to them). Given those two choices, I’d much rather live in a nice apartment for the next few years (or longer) with control over my money and begin saving again…and who knows, maybe you can rent a nice house from a FB and virtually be back where you started (although temporarily with worse credit).

It would be an obvious choice to me - too bad the geniuses on Wall Street didn’t think of that outcome.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by IllinoisBob
2008-02-09 09:55:49

It is a sad day when a FB has gotten himself in such a rotten situation in the 1st place! My finances are mortgage / income = .6, CC payed off every month, credit score 820, saving = 10x mortgage. Why are people such FOOLS?

 
Comment by GotRocks
2008-02-09 11:39:51

I don’t agree that they’re fools. Think about it - they get to live in a nice house (to them), in a nice area, where they never could have afforded prior. If they managed to cash-out refi and spent the money on new cars (cash purchases), college tuition, and put in a bunch of money into retirement where it can never be seized, they are much better off than when they began. And if the lender doesn’t (or cannot) come after them for deficiency, then they’re totally home-free. For someone making 50k and no hope (to them) of otherwise living that lifestyle, it makes perfect sense to me.

The part that I cannot understand is why the enablers thought they could get away with this scam forever.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Little Al
2008-02-09 07:20:25

What will be the smoking gun that indicates we’re at a market bottom in housing? I believe we have to see firesale prices at 20% of boom level from lenders to clear tax obligations off their books. Plus, local governments will be screaming from reduced collections.

Comment by DannyHSDad
2008-02-09 07:33:23

When your local grocery clerk tells you that buying a home is the worst idea ever.

Or when your low ball offer is countered by the seller with even lower price? (to make sure you don’t run away or change your mind.) Or maybe the counter comes back in an envelope stuffed with cash? (I can wish, but remember when a seller had some squirrel feeding requirements? Or buyers writing long essays? Those were the days.)

 
Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-09 10:21:04

What will be the smoking gun that indicates we’re at a market bottom in housing?

When the average rent of an apartment or house with comparable amenities is higher in the area where you want to buy, that’s the smoking gun.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 05:52:45

Real Estate
Mortgage Meltdown Archive
Refinancing: Only for the privileged few

Sure, now is a great time to refinance - that is, if you can still qualify. Here is what lenders are looking for.

By Les Christie, CNNMoney.com staff writer
February 8 2008: 3:00 PM EST

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — The good news: mortgage rates are down. The bad news: it’s much harder to qualify for a refinanced loan these days.

What’s more, the borrowers who need to refinance the most - because their adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) are resetting to higher interest rates - are among those having the most trouble winning approvals.

“I’m turning away about 60% to 75% of the clients who come to me for a refi,” said Bob Moulton, president of Americana Mortgage Group on Long Island, N.Y. “Some don’t have enough equity and others have bad credit scores.”

http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/08/real_estate/who_can_refi/index.htm

Comment by Hoz
2008-02-09 07:44:48

…“ordinary mortals are still obviously having a hard time drawing a connection between the seemingly abstract area of credit and what is usually referred to as the ‘real world’.” This is clear, he notes, from the “grinning faces recently observed on CNBC opining from places like Chicago that Wall Street was getting too depressed about the “macro” because of investment banks’ own specific problems….

the other aspect of this credit crunch is that it becomes ever harder for better-positioned individual institutions to avoid the escalating distress”.

‘FTalphaville

 
Comment by Darrell in PHX
2008-02-09 10:35:12

Banks were falling all over each other trying to refi me. I owe $170K on a house with market value of $235K. $130K combined income for my wife and I.

I got 4.75% on 15-year.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 18:16:42

Did you figure out how to get banks to compete for your biz?

 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
Comment by DannyHSDad
2008-02-09 07:16:29

Ah, the great post-bubble fire season has started as many people here have anticipated. I suppose shorting the insurance companies would have been the right bet?

Comment by not a gator
2008-02-09 09:44:39

If insurance company is convinced that it was owner-arson … he no payee.

Comment by NoVa RE Supernova
2008-02-09 15:14:50

Don’t they have to prove it, though? That’s the rub.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by bizarroworld
2008-02-09 07:23:45

Fire sale in progress. No returns, no refunds - all sales final!

 
 
Comment by bizarroworld
2008-02-09 06:02:09

From Japan’s Slump in 1990s, Lessons for U.S.
http://tinyurl.com/2sxbld

In Japan, housing prices in the major metropolitan regions nearly tripled from 1985 to 1991, then proceeded to lose two-thirds of their value over the next 14 years. Today, prices have risen slightly, according to Japanese government statistics. Still, Japanese house prices last year were only slightly higher than the level before the boom, more than two decades ago.

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-09 15:52:32

My impression is that the Japanese always had a savings culture to fall back into (which perhaps assisted in prolonging the down years). In the U.S., we have drifted into an unsustainable overspending culture. If that changes in a shock… The government and the Fed can stimulate a lot, but if the culture shifts back to sustainability, they may find they don’t have the leverage they expect. I don’t really expect that to happen. Acceptance of some pain and the idea of delayed gratification taking root again seems so very unlikely here.

What is worse for the long term? The Powers That Be being wrong about the economy and culture, or correct?

 
 
Comment by cynicalgirl
2008-02-09 06:10:32

Open house or not?

Most people who attend open houses aren’t serious buyers, a survey of real estate agents by the Real Estate Center at Texas A&M University found. And only 14 percent of buyers say they first learned of the home they purchased through an open house, according to the 2007 National Association of Realtors Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers.

All of which raises an obvious question: Sure, weekend open houses are a time-honored tradition in the real estate business, but do they work?

In real estate circles, there’s a lively debate about whether open houses actually help sell homes — especially these days, when 90 percent of homebuyers use the Internet to hunt for and preview homes.

On industry blogs and Web sites, real estate agents are abuzz over the issue, and the general consensus seems to be this: Open houses are great — but not necessarily for the people trying to sell their homes.

http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index.ssf?/base/news-13/120253533995340.xml&coll=1

Comment by skip
2008-02-09 12:00:55

I’ve always felt it helped the criminals plan out their next heist..

Comment by reuven
2008-02-09 23:36:15

I bought my Sunnyvale house at an open house! A Realt-whore (TM) had been showing us houses for a couple of months. None of them we liked. Finally, we went to an open house on our own, liked it, and made an offer (at about 7% less than asking price). After a tiny bit of dickering, it was ours. (And now it’s 100% paid off, too!)

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 06:15:11

Debt Eaters
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_Eater

What “compells” GSEs to soak up toxic mortgage debt? I thought they were private firms with shareholders to whom they are held accountable?

Real Estate
Mortgage Meltdown Archive
Freddie, Fannie debt may pose risk to economy

The housing slump has compelled the two entities to buy up mortgages on the secondary market that banks are backing away from. But that could end badly, charges one regulator.

By Les Christie, CNNMoney.com staff writer
February 7 2008: 1:16 PM EST

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — The increased share of housing debt taken on by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae during the housing slump has put the two government sponsored enterprises at risk, it was charged Thursday.

The two outfits are “reducing risks in the market, but concentrating mortgage risks on themselves. These risks are beginning to take their toll,” said James Lockhart, director of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), which regulates Fannie and Freddie. He was speaking Thursday at a Senate Banking committee on regulatory reform.

Freddie will report its first ever annual loss for 2007 at the end of February, while Fannie, is expected to report its first loss in 22 years for the year.

As the subprime crisis has grown, banks have backed away from buying mortgages in the secondary market. This has left Fannie and Freddie, which do the same thing, to pick up the slack.

As a result, the two government sponsored entities (GSEs) saw the housing debt they and the Federal Home Loan Banks carry grow by 16 percent to $6.3 trillion, more than the total public debt of the United States, according to Lockhart.

http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/07/real_estate/raise_GSE_cap_limits/index.htm

Comment by mrktMaven FL
2008-02-09 10:26:26

Full speed ahead! Damn falling home prices.

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-09 15:57:29

I thought they were private firms with shareholders to whom they are held accountable? they frequently lie to.

 
 
Comment by Ria Rhodes
2008-02-09 06:17:15

“President Bush’s budget plan for 2009, which includes money for an economic stimulus package, calls for the federal deficit to more than double, to $410 billion, this year.”

What the f__k does he care? He’s off to millionaire ranch after leaving a big fat mess. Maybe if we get on our knees and pray really hard, all the bad things will go bye bye.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 06:19:06

The vacant McMansions which dot the land will be a lasting tribute to his term in office.

Comment by txchick57
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 07:05:41

Have you seen that movie? I heard a review on NPR, but have not seen it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2008-02-09 07:17:56

No, it’s only in NY and LA now but I’ll see it when it gets here.

 
Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-09 13:23:46

Did anyone Notice the fine print in the recent passing of the new bill?
The fine print, W put into an extra $4mill to extract Americans from foreign soil, and an extra chunk of dough for unusual circumstances.
Does anyone see SOMETHING COMING in 08-early 09?
And the executive law W passed that would give the pres martial law rights, and dictatorial rights?

Can anyone see SOMETHING IS COMING?

Not to be paranoid, but when those monies were slipped into the recent economic stimulu package and mormons for the last 2 yrs are being preached to make sure their food stockpile is complete, their larder is full…

I can add.

Be prepared.

now.

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-09 16:01:14

One of the funniest things about giving up your American citizenship is that if the IRS decides you did so to avoid taxes then you still owe income taxes for 10 years or so after.

Wesley Snipes, take note.

 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-09 07:08:11

“It was Vice President Dick Cheney who noted in a television interview that the fight against Islamic extremism would necessitate a trip to “the dark side,”

The next generation will be about getting back from the dark side, militarily, economically and spiritually. Thanks a lot, Dick!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sd renter
2008-02-09 08:52:57

As Dan Rowan from Laugh In used to say, “Say goodnight Dick.”

DIck Rowan says, “Goodnight Dick.”

After the elections, every American should be thrilled to say goodnight to that DIck.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 09:04:45

You have to wonder, just what is Dick up to?

(5 oceanic cables being cut at the same time, in the Med)

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-09 09:33:31

Lad, please elaborate…

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 09:48:53

Over the past week or so, 5 oceanic cables that lay on the bottom of the Mediterranean have been cut, by somebody.

Internet traffic is being disrupted in the Middle East, as a result.

 
Comment by mgnyc
2008-02-09 10:31:07

can’t let those evil doers watch porn online

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 11:00:35

Especially when there are 72 vestal versions, on-line.

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-09 11:04:58

Can divers get down that deep or do you need a Cousteau-type sub? Interesting.

 
Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-09 13:24:53

Alad is right, the cables were cut, and all connections to India etc were cut off completely.

Adding it all up.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 15:12:53

Look on the bright side: W remained healthy and hearty for his full eight years in office :-)

 
Comment by Earl The Vagabond
2008-02-09 22:20:32

Copper thieves…

lol

 
 
 
 
Comment by spike66
2008-02-09 08:20:48

What is his intention with this final “budget” anyways. Is he determined to leave the country nothing but a smoking rubble?

Comment by edhopper
2008-02-09 09:31:31

From the German Historical Intsttuit.
http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=1590
“On March 19, 1945, the hopeless state of the war effort prompted Hitler to issue the “Nero Decree,” which called for the complete destruction of Germany’s infrastructure. The approaching enemy would thus find nothing but “scorched earth.” Hitler justified this step as a military necessity, but his intention was to destroy the German population as punishment for its defeat. There was to be no future for the nation after National Socialism.

Comment by not a gator
2008-02-09 09:49:10

He also charged 15 and 16 year old boys to “defend the fatherland” by waiting with guns for the Allied forces. Of course, this was a death sentence. The post-war West German anti-war movie “Die Bruecke” (The Bridge) is a good treatment of this final, desperate chapter of Nazidom.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by edhopper
2008-02-09 11:00:53

Coming to a theater ner you;
“Die Busheke”

 
Comment by skip
2008-02-09 12:05:00

We of course, have one prisoner in Gitmo that was captured when he was 14. He is 20 now, so his execution will of course be legal.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 06:18:14

I wish to nominate Les Christie for a mortgage meltdown journalism award!

Real Estate
Mortgage Meltdown Archive
Las Vegas tops foreclosure list

The Nevada area has seven of the top ten zip codes hardest hit by the housing meltdown.

By Les Christie, CNNMoney.com staff writer
February 5 2008: 3:53 PM EST

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — The epicenter of foreclosures shifted to the booming city of Las Vegas at the end of 2007.

Seven of the top 100 worst-hit zip codes last December were in the gaming capital, according to statistics compiled for CNNMoney.com by RealtyTrac, the online marketer of foreclosure properties.

A year ago, old Midwestern industrial cities like Detroit and Cleveland dominated the foreclosure statistics amid factory closings and job losses. Now, otherwise prosperous Sun-Belt cities contain the zip codes worst hit by defaults.

http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/05/real_estate/zip_code_foreclosures/index.htm

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 08:04:41

I get the feeling that business in the casinos has gone dead flat, on weekdays…

And Pavlovegas needs constant reinforcement.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 08:24:24

I’d like to send out special congratulations to Fontucky…

#29 & #85 on the top 100 foreclosure towns in these 50 United States~

A two-fer

Comment by Patricia
2008-02-09 09:35:20

I never understood the draw of Fontana. I had a co-worker and her cop husband buy a brand-new house for 450k in the “good area”. Fontana was and always will be a sh*thole. I wouldn’t go any further east than Claremont. Rancho Cucamonga is another “brand-new” community, rows and rows of new homes, condo’s etc. I check ziprealty for prices on condos and they are finally dumping like I knew they would.

Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-09 13:28:24

I once had a friend try to set me up with a date in Azusa …

from LA.

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?? are you kidding me?
oh good, drive forever to a distant place just to get um some nooky? And Azusa?
sheesh. with friends like that…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2008-02-09 06:22:46

It is common *knowledge (*oxymoron of the word vs. industry, imho) that open houses are your portable office. Its a place to meet future clients. They know the buyer of that home, isn’t the walk in to the open house, its a self serving marketing tool. The poor homeowner who agrees to the open house, is being used, again, in my humble opinion.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 06:25:42

I for one am looking forward to eating some good guacomole dip once open house season gets fully underway this year…

Comment by awaiting wipeout
2008-02-09 06:33:11

I agree about the eatery benefit of open houses. The best open houses are the *broker to broker (actually its an agent to agent) open house. Its usually the day, the $ is spent on food. The public gets the cheap cr*ap.
*broker = title inflation usually. You need 24 more units and you need to pass an 8 hr test to be a broker in Ca.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 06:52:31

Is the food worth getting a broker’s license?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-02-09 09:23:37

PB. Perhaps you could find an open house in SD where a bunch of HBBers could meet up and have a grand old time. Name the perfect place soon.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 10:48:57

Wouldn’t a bunch of us swooping in on an open house to eat free technically qualify us as “equity parasites”?

 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2008-02-09 12:01:13

LOL. Gives new life to those foreclosure bus tours vaunts.

 
Comment by Evil Capitalist
2008-02-09 12:08:03

Oh no. Just prospective clients liberating some equity.

 
 
 
Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-09 13:30:04

are you kidding? where is it that food is offered at open houses?

Never ever seen that.
Must be arriving late?

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 06:33:52

Prospect of stimulation by Bush’s package offers hope to San Diego home owners. I guess it doesn’t matter that home prices here are already more than ten percent below the mania peak, or that those who bought near the peak are the ones most likely to be clamoring for a rescue?

Homeowners could catch a break
Stimulus package raises ‘conforming loan’ limit
By Roger Showley
STAFF WRITER
February 9, 2008

Congress may be issuing $600-per-person tax rebate checks this spring, but the temporary mortgage revisions in the economic stimulus package passed this week could have a greater effect on San Diego’s economy, particularly its beleaguered housing market.

Conforming loan limit

That’s because the package, expected to be signed next week by President Bush, could save some homeowners hundreds of dollars a month in mortgage payments and rescue other owners wanting to refinance out of adjustable-rate mortgages.

Specifically, the stimulus package temporarily raises the maximum size of mortgages that government-sponsored mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can buy and market as securities from $417,000 to as high as $729,750 in expensive parts of the country, including some in California.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080209/news_1b9housing.html

Comment by txchick57
2008-02-09 06:52:31

yeah right. How many of them have any equity or could qualify under real world standards.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 06:54:16

Exactimento. Why can’t journalists check facts before posting?

 
Comment by GotRocks
2008-02-09 07:20:27

True…almost all of Florida is under today’s limit and it ain’t helping them much.

 
 
Comment by tuxedo_junction
2008-02-09 12:22:20

Assume an interest rate premium of 75 BPs for a non-conforming loan. At the $730k maximum instead of needing an income of $200k to qualify (28% P&I) you can qualify with an income of $183k. I’m sure that will increase demand dramatically.

 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2008-02-09 06:34:44

att SLIM & others
opportunity
I remember pitching a small bank on a micro type BtoB lending program and being chucked out because mortgages were so easy and sweet- should I call back ?
The idea involved an equity stake and recourse from dealers
which was a late 70’s thing

 
Comment by flatffplan
2008-02-09 07:07:49

NAR -apply a factor of 10
The Realtors, in its monthly economic and sales outlook, is forecasting a 1.2% drop in prices of existing homes sold this year. A month ago it was still forecasting that prices would be flat this year and that a home market rebound in the last half of 2008

 
Comment by WT Economist
2008-02-09 07:49:41

My notice of assessment from NYC, for a 17 foot wide rowhouse without parking built in 1915 that was redlined 25 years ago.

This year’s market value, $1,053,000 (identical houses on the street have been selling at $999,000, and not a penny more, since 2004, but none have sold in six months. My new neighbors are either really rich or really broke).

Next year’s market value, $979,000, a 7 percent decrease.

The taxable value will rise from $21,104 to $22,408, a 6 percent increase (max allowed). My taxes are based on a market value of $394,000, because of that restriction.

Actual market value, based on rental equivalence and current interest rates — perhaps $640,000. Note that at three times income, that assumes an household income of $215K for what had been a cop/teacher/fireman/small store owner neighborhood since 1915. It is’nt bad for two (non-Wall Street) professionals either, even in NYC — it is more than double my salary.

People say I’m nuts when I say sales prices must fall, because Brooklyn will never be cheap again. I say I believe prices will stay high, but that it is a long way down to merely high.

Comment by edhopper
2008-02-09 09:36:24

I agree. People in NYC have mistakened outrageous for high. A small SFH in Queens is high at $350,000, it’s outrageous at $700,000.

 
 
Comment by Hoz
2008-02-09 08:45:40

“The Homer Simpson approach to purchasing wine at restaurants is to buy the second least expensive wine on the menu. What if everybody behaved this way? Restauranteurs would have an incentive to price the wine that costs them the least higher than before, to enhance profits. But if customers know the owners will do this it becomes a game between customers and owners, with the customers’ strategies being Buy 2nd Least Expensive, Buy Something Else, and the owners’ strategies being Price Fairly (to reflect costs), Don’t Price Fairly. As always, the outcome of the game depends on the payoffs, and one can construct them in ways that will make Homer look good, or look bad.”
http://tinyurl.com/2t5xof
Econ Thought for the day
jan16, 2008
U of Texas

Comment by Left LA Behind
2008-02-09 11:58:13

Bart: I’ll do the honors. [takes the wine list, reads it] No, no, no, no! My God! What passes for a wine list these days? Marco, just bring us your freshest bottle of wine, chop-chop.

 
 
Comment by SU Guy
2008-02-09 08:56:30

I have been educated by this forum thanks to the efforts of Ben and all the smart good looking people I am sure. My question is I have been keeping my eyes on a 3700 sq.ft house in an upscale neighborhood. The house was built in 05. The owners a retired doctor relocated to CA. The house has been empty since July 07. The asking price was 525K, then came down to 500K then it dropped to 429K. Now it is priced at 400K. The taxes are around 17K. I was thinking about offering 375K. What do you folks think? I don’t want to catch a falling knife or give myself the Joshua tree treatment

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 09:18:39

If you comfortable buying in the top of the 2nd Inning, go for it.

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-09 09:38:23

Wait year and buy it for 275k.

Comment by SU Guy
2008-02-09 10:11:33

Thank you for the good advice. But does it make sense when the new construction cost is higher than the selling price. A price of $100 sq.ft how can this be beaten

Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-09 10:27:34

Maybe, unless the cost of materials (lumber, copper, cement) and labor drops over the next year and the year after…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by combotechie
2008-02-09 10:44:26

“A price of $100 sq. ft how can this be beaten(?)”

If this is a question that asks “How low can a price of a house go?” then think of Cleveland, a place where HUD is selling them for a dollar.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by exeter
2008-02-09 11:01:14

When it can be built for $50/sq, I’d say builders and home debtors have a problem.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SU Guy
2008-02-09 12:08:41

This is a brand new house with highend stuff. Question I have is can labor and materials actually drop any less in the long run. We have all discussed that prices will fall. How low can they go. This is a neighborhood with dr and layers. So I doubt it will ever be $1 a house. I am wondering are we passing up on some real good deals. Thanks for all the input.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 13:21:02

You’ll hate yourself for overpaying early on in the unwinding, as prices plunge into the abyss…

Patience is just as important as timing, right now.

 
Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-09 13:36:42

Offer $275 and stick there.

Cash, close in 15 days. or less. Ya never know.
Offer than once per mo.

 
Comment by implosion
2008-02-09 17:15:53

“This is a neighborhood with dr and layers.”

Are you a dr or layer?

 
Comment by warlock
2008-02-09 17:21:44

Same advice as above, but start at 300. The following month offer 295, and then 290 the third….

 
Comment by SUGuy
2008-02-09 17:35:17

Thank you again. In a week greedy type of a moment I might have made an offer. I will wait. Btw I am also a cash buyer so lowballing with a quick close will work in our favor.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Hoz
2008-02-09 08:56:30

Posted on the all Street Journal this morning:

We must start trying to answer the question:
“What is money?”
Comment by Howard Garrison - February 9, 2008 at 1:09 am
http://tinyurl.com/224v9r

 
Comment by WAman
2008-02-09 09:00:56

I read a lot of posts in the past two days about a Hillary and McCain matchup. I think that many people are way behind the curve on this one.

10,000 see Obama in Nebraska!
14,000 see Obama in Boise!
22,000 see Obama in Seattle!

He rented out the Key Arena and they had to send thousands away - Hillary had a crowd of 6,000 show up.

YES WE CAN

Comment by not a gator
2008-02-09 10:02:31

Woo hoo!

Btw, if you look at the figures, the NE loves Hillary, the SE voted on racial lines, and the midwest loves Barack. We need some Midwestern decency in the Oval Office.

The fact that Iowa went with Huckabee also makes me wonder if I should give him a chance. I don’t agree with him on almost everything, but he seems like a decent guy. *shrug*

(Not as worried about politics as I used to be, because I’ve taken a lot more control over my own life. However, that doesn’t mean I’m giving up my civic duties! Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.)

Comment by exeter
2008-02-09 10:28:32

Gator, the sad irony is that Huckabee actually LIVES his faith unlike the countless other pandering morons with (r) after their name who give lip service to faith and don’t live it, all the while demonizing those who reject it. Last weeks CPAC conference made that fact glaringly obvious. It was difficult to distinguish it from the psych ward at Bellvue.

Comment by VirginiaTechDan
2008-02-09 14:58:02

If Huckabee lived his faith then his positions would be more in line with Ron Paul. Huckabee plays the faith card to gain votes, but is really after power.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by exeter
2008-02-09 20:44:19

I see. Baptist preacher is playing the faith card so what about the idiot son? It sounds to me that you’ll castigate anyone that doesn’t align with your beliefs. I don’t agree with anything about Huckabee but clearly his faith is genuine.

 
Comment by Martin Cohen
2008-02-09 22:47:33

What scares me about Huckabee is his “Christian nation” viewpoint. He wants to change the constitution to match his view of the bible.

I am Jewish, so I find myself wanting to ask him “In your vision of America, what color armband would I wear?”

That’s how scared I am of him - really.

 
 
 
 
Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-09 10:34:38

We know what Hillary stands for - Hillary care. I’m suspicious of Obama, but he could turn out to surprise us and become a fiscal conservative president. I have no problem with Obama becoming the frontrunner of the Democrats (Good Riddance to Socialist Hillary). But I’m all for Ron Paul. I know what he stands for. I’m okay with his stance on abortion because he would leave it up to the states (I’m pro-choice). I agree with every single one of his other stands on taxation, spending, war, terrorism, and illegal aliens.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2008-02-09 11:46:13

Does the President make the office or does the office and the times make the President ? Whoever gets into office is not going to have a great presidency because they will be forced into solving extreme problems in which they won’t be able to please everybody .The ongoing bickering between parties might not be a option in the near future and the Senate and Congress might just have to get very serous about solving real problem in the best interest of the Country as a whole . Special interest groups might not be able to talk ,when the Nation as a whole is about ready to walk .

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-09 16:47:56

I’m glad McCain won CA and presumably the eventual GOP nomination. If I can get 1:10 odds somewhere where someone puts money on McCain getting 1 or more CA Electoral College votes, please let me know how to get in touch with them.

 
 
 
Comment by Hoz
2008-02-09 09:08:15

Economics 181 International Trade
Fall 2006

Instructor: Professor Ann Harrison

The lectures are in pdf format ~5 pgs each

UC Berkeley
http://tinyurl.com/2nke79

Fun with numbers!

 
Comment by Sniggle
2008-02-09 09:32:00

I wonder why we have not seen more articles on the following:
- Empty houses been destroyed by freezing pipes
- Municipalities reporting a significant increase in unpaid taxes/tax sales (since many loans do not have escrow).

Comment by Housing Wizard
2008-02-09 11:38:50

The losses and potential for more losses are astounding . When I think about all the vacant houses rotting ,while other people couldn’t get into houses because they were priced out of this bogus market ,I’m just numbed with sadness over how this situation got so out of hand . I hate waste and boy this boom produce a Katrina of waste that is hard to witness . Oh well …horse out of the barn .

 
Comment by tresho
Comment by tresho
2008-02-09 18:38:33


When Cuyahoga County Ohio Deputy Sheriff Kole
arrives for an eviction, he unholsters his SIG .45 and walks the perimeter of the property. He then secures the inside of the home, often heavily damaged either by the evacuating family or marauding metal opportunists who sometimes strike the instant the homeowner leaves.

These pirates steal hot water heaters and light fixtures, or simply punch gaping holes into the interior walls and rip out the copper plumbing. They’ve also been known to peel the external aluminum from the sides of the house up to the height that a 10-foot ladder will allow them to stretch and strip.

These roving scavengers are the hyenas of the foreclosure plague.

Inside the home, sometimes standing in ankle-deep water, Kole presides over the physical transfer in ownership. There are few things that surprise him anymore. But occasionally, he encounters a starving and confused pet. As people are tossed from their homes, they sometimes leave their animals behind.

He finds dogs, cats and rabbits. He keeps dry dog food in his cruiser to feed these angry and dying pets whenever he finds them. “

 
 
Comment by tresho
2008-02-09 18:45:27

Metal thieves strike nursing home. The latest of several attempts to steal water meters to cash in on the metal damaged some lines outside a downtown Orlando nursing home, endangering the lives of residents inside.

 
Comment by tresho
2008-02-09 18:54:06

Preventing water damage: In New Prague, MN, a rash of foreclosures in one subdivision has left city officials wrestling with whether to reconnect power to vacant foreclosed homes in damp soils and pay for a small amount of electricity needed to keep sump pumps running. Otherwise, water damage to those houses could eat into the city’s tax base.

Comment by Leighsong
2008-02-09 19:28:00

Dang Tresho,

I’m in tears!

I fear the worse is yet to come…please God let me be wrong!

Best,
Leigh

 
 
 
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-02-09 09:34:04

Went to a funeral for a family friend in Pasadena. It was held at Caltech with bagpipes, scotch whiskey and tears.
I cornered a speaker who is the daughter of Charlie Munger.
I told her that her father is often mentioned on this blog.
Her husband asked me why don’t I just go to zillow for house info.
I told him HBB is a doom and gloom site. Was I correct?

Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-09 10:03:41

Ouro, sorry about the funeral. Hope all’s OK. But I have to ask, did you do any shopping on your trip??

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-02-09 16:22:33

Losty-no shopping.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-09 18:17:27

Good for you, you’re staying on the wagon (or is it off, I get confused, never having had a wagon, myself). In case you missed it, I posted this a few days ago in your honor:

http://tinyurl.com/38dabu

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 10:44:40

By all means, trust zillow for house information, as they are an unbiased source, unlike this doom-and-gloom blog.

Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-09 13:39:52

are you being sarcastic?
ironic?

Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-09 14:28:01

The Prof has a PhD in irony.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 15:07:04

Actually the irony is somewhat of a reaction against academics who are overly confident about their opinions.

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-02-09 15:23:22

with an MA in wisdom…

 
 
 
 
Comment by implosion
2008-02-09 17:37:24

Did your family friend have a link with Caltech?

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-02-10 08:39:22

Implosion. Yes. David Elliot was a history professor. The ceremony mentioned that nerds needed a rounded education. David Elliot was a handsome man with a wonderful Scottish accent. He called me Princess Ann my whole life. He said it was because I was a natural ruler. Who will ever call me that again?

 
 
 
Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-09 10:48:51

Hey Ben, did you see this yet?

http://www.azcentral.com/community/chandler/articles/0208ev-houseprices0208ON.html

Data on repeat home sales shows huge drops
Kerry Fehr-Snyder
The Arizona Republic
Feb. 9, 2008 08:00 AM

Home prices in several Valley cities are falling at rates not seen since 1990, wiping out equity and making it difficult for those trying to refinance.

(read on… - Bill)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 10:55:04

February 8, 2008, 4:59 pm
Non-Borrowed Reserves: False Alarm

A number of people on Wall Street have noticed a recent plunge in non-borrowed reserves in the banking system and wondered it is a sign of distress in the banking system or of unusually stringent monetary policy. They dropped from $42 billion last November to negative $2 billion at the end of January.

It’s probably a false alarm, though.

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2008/02/08/non-borrowed-reserves-false-alarm/

Comment by aladinsane
2008-02-09 11:12:26

If you aren’t giving positive reinforcement, you are aiding the terrorists.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 11:02:00

I wonder if Berner or any other Wall Street economist knows how to properly factor in the blowback from a foreclosure crisis and credit bubble implosion into his forecast?

February 8, 2008, 2:29 pm
Double-Dip Recession Ahead?

The economy isn’t even officially in recession yet, and already some are warning of a “double-dip”: a slump, followed by a brief recovery, then renewed slump.

“The policy cavalry has arrived and reinforcements are coming, in the form of the aggressive monetary and fiscal stimulus,” economist Richard Berner of Morgan Stanley wrote last week. But the fiscal boost “will fizzle in the fall, and the payback in early 2009 likely will cast doubt on the rebound.” Because the tax cuts will be temporary, so will the economic boost.

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2008/02/08/double-dip-recession-ahead/

 
Comment by Hondje
2008-02-09 11:26:35

From Barron’s Online, an interview with Jeremy Grantham, Chief Investment Strategist of GMO:

“The other near certainty is that house prices will go back to a normal multiple of family income. In the end, we, the people, have to be able to afford the houses and they are affordable at something around 2.8 times family income. When they peak in Boston at 6 times and nationally at 3.9 times, you know you are in for tough times.

Incidentally, it was late in ‘06 when [Fed Chairman Benjamin] Bernanke said he thought the high prices of homes in the U.S. merely reflected a strong U.S. economy. Was he not looking at the data? Did he not measure long-term house prices? Had he not seen how they ebbed and flowed as a multiple of family income, which they do here and in the U.K. and everywhere else? And with it being so obviously a bubble, how could he have said that?”

“Greenspan and Bernanke have taken a hands-off approach for two consecutive great bubbles, first in TMT — telecommunications, media and technology — and second, in housing. A hands-off approach is a polite way of saying they facilitated this. And what is the point of a 125-basis-point rate reduction, other than to provide reinforcement for the people who borrow short and lend long? From bankers who have committed every crime you could possibly accuse a banker of, to hedge funds who borrow short, leverage, and invest long in the stock market — that’s who really benefits from the interest-rate reduction. The economy, broadly defined, does not.”

“I have an exhibit that shows the 30 years prior to 1982 when the debt-to-gross domestic product ratio was completely flat at 1.2 times. Total debt is defined as government debt, personal debt, corporate debt and financial debt. Then in the 25 years after 1982, the flat line goes up at a 45 degrees angle from 1.2 times to 3.1 times GDP. Massive. In the first 30 years, when debt is flat, annual GDP growth is its usual battleship, growing at 3.5% and hardly twitching. After the massive increase in debt, GDP, far from accelerating, grew at 3%. So debt in the aggregate does not drive the economy. The economy is driven by education, man-hours worked, capital investment and technology. It is not driven by what I owe you and you owe me.”

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 15:02:33

“Greenspan and Bernanke have taken a hands-off approach for two consecutive great bubbles,…”

What planet is that writer from?

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-02-09 16:47:55

He is about the most famous money-manager you have never heard of. Just because he’s not in the spotlight like Buffett does not mean he is not legendary in the right circles. :-)

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-09 18:10:46

I confess that I largely ignore the money manager tribe — even Buffett.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-09 11:30:35

RE agent in IE is going to GMAC convention in LV this week and the convention is only expecting 1/3 of attendees they had 2 yrs ago.
No BIG names to entertain, NO Big Speakers.
Not like 2 yrs ago, when Chicago the group played and Giuliani spoke.

 
Comment by Lurkeeloo
2008-02-09 11:37:42

From Yahoo News:

Headline: “Rebates could stave off long recession”

“WASHINGTON - Despite remarkably quick passage, the economic aid plan and its cash rebates may come too late to prevent a recession this year. For many experts, however, the $168 billion boost to the lagging economy may mean the difference between a short downturn and something much more serious.”

So now, a recession is kind of a given, but rebates *could* make it shorter. Sure they *could*. Somehow this reminds me of a saying about flying monkeys.

Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-09 13:41:45

I might get the 300 and that will stave off the long recession?
hahahahahaha
I smell BS.

 
 
Comment by tuxedo_junction
2008-02-09 14:10:19

The withering consumer.

The following are estimates of “cash out” on refinances of FHLMC purchased/securitized home loans. Data is from FHLMC’s website.

Quarter IV, 2007 $37.8 bil
Quarter III, 2007 58.3
Quarter IV, 2006 70.7
Quarter III, 2006 80.2

I was expecting a mild recession (since 12/06 so I’m no soothsayer) but I may change my mind.

 
Comment by diemos
2008-02-09 16:41:56

Hey TxChick,

Your friend Nina has a new post up on how Coutrywide has shut off the HELOCs on her Arizona investment properties.

Durn it! Don’t those Countrywide goons know that those credit lines are her emergency savings! How dare they! The nerve.

Comment by sm_landlord
2008-02-09 17:27:50

Yes, and she goes on to whine about how her lender (Countrywide) doesn’t like lesbians. She thought her HELOC was a savings account. She didn’t read the fine print. Woe is she. I guess she should have saved some money.

 
 
Comment by Ria Rhodes
2008-02-09 16:42:12

Comment by SU Guy:
“I think Americans think 10 minutes into the future.”

..and I think most Americans think about as far as the next slice of pizza, and the next swipe of their plastic card(s).

Comment by sm_landlord
2008-02-09 17:32:43

Oh, no. I’m quite sure that Americans think 20 minutes into the future, as did the Brits before them.

Beware of Blipverts!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20_Minutes_into_the_Future

 
 
Comment by Ria Rhodes
2008-02-09 16:48:44

Comment by exeter:
“..the sad irony is that Huckabee actually LIVES his faith unlike the countless other pandering morons with (r) after their name who give lip service to faith and don’t live it”

Good, let him LIVE it from a pulpit somewhere, but not from the White House.

Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-09 23:50:47

That is Why the founding fathers Mentioned
Separation of church and state.

Musta had some previous problems with mixing it up before, sos they put that part in INK>

 
 
Comment by tresho
2008-02-09 18:04:22

A class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of Cleveland, Ohio homeowners who lost their homes to foreclosure by Deutsche Bank. An attorney for the filing firm believes believes homeowners foreclosed upon by Deutsche Bank may be entitled to recovery of substantial feeds and damages, and in some cases, where the bank re-purchased the homes at sheriff’s sales, could actually recover their homes.

 
Comment by tresho
2008-02-09 18:18:09

Failed American Home Mortgage Investment Corp. is offering to sell hard copies of 490,000 home loan files (rather than destroy them outright) to investors who claim an ownership right. Kelly Beaudin Stapleton, U.S. Trustee for the Delaware bankruptcy court, objected to the destruction plan on behalf of consumers. Homeowners looking for evidence of defects in their loans should get a chance to retrieve documents, said the federal bankruptcy watchdog.

American Home says it wants no problems with consumer privacy laws, and is wary of giving files to investors that no longer have a stake in the mortgages, “given the constant change in loan ownership in the secondary market of the loan industry.”

American Home says it wants to get rid of the loan files because it costs $45,000 per month to warehouse them. Destroying the 490,000 hard copy files would have cost the company an estimated $1 million.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post

  • The Housing Bubble Blog