February 17, 2008

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For February 17, 2008

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

230 Comments »

Comment by wmbz
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-17 06:01:38

“There would undoubtedly be much greater confidence if prices in the U.S. real estate market, where the crisis originated, finally stabilized. That could happen as soon as the middle of this year.”

The Douche-Bag Meter is pegged on this guy. It seems to me that The Masters of the Universe have been pretty clueless throughout this thing. I predict that they will remain clueless, greedy, tools for many many quarters, not months.

Comment by WT Economist
2008-02-17 06:14:54

They are clueless and greedy, but we are THEIR tools.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-17 06:16:58

Good point. It’s another Jack Daniels breakfast for me. Thanks a lot WT. There’s nothing like JD on Lucky Charms.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by auger-inn
2008-02-17 06:56:26

It tastes better on Cheerio’s, fyi.

 
Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-17 11:44:09

How ’bout Cocopuffs?

 
Comment by tresho
2008-02-17 21:26:39

Whiskey is healthier if you mix it with steel-cut oats.

 
 
Comment by mgnyc
2008-02-17 07:09:52
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-17 07:55:13

Sssssshhhhhhhhhhhh! Don’t let the people in Queens hear you. They all think their homes are worth a fortune because, “everybody wants to live there”. What a joke!

 
Comment by tl
2008-02-17 08:05:27

Uh, Queens is the largest borough in NYC. This story highlights one area only. Yes, Queens is headed for lower prices for sure — but it is far, far from a ghost town.

The problem with the above area is that it had no gentrification (AKA, white people moving in). So working-class blacks took he ARM bait and now can’t pay. Thesr neighborhoods get hit the worst in times like this. But all of Queens will take a hit.

 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-17 08:11:06

Wow! That block in the photo looks hideous! No offense NYC but I can’t think of any blocks around me that have such uniformly depressing housing stock. What did those fetch?

Then, the NYC metro will lose $10 Billion in tax receipts in 2008! Our local governments nationwide are so unprepared. (although admittedly Bloomie is probably one of better prepared)

 
Comment by mgnyc
2008-02-17 09:17:09

edgewater john

this is true it is a realy ugly area at the peak of the bubble those types of homes were fetching 500k plus

now i see them under 250k but who wants to live there

south jamaica is the armpit of queens and can be downright dangerous

 
 
 
Comment by nhz
2008-02-17 07:15:03

there would be even greater confidence if we could be sure that the EU housing bubble is NOT going to pop. I hope he puts his money where his mouth is and goes down the drain with the rest of these elitists.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 07:29:37

I believe that Europe has a worse “Japanese problem” (aging demographic picture) than the U.S. See article I linked in below on this subject…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by nhz
2008-02-17 07:36:40

from all I have read the demographic problem will not kick in until at least 2012-2015, and for most EU countries 10-20 years later - that is far beyond the political horizon.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 07:55:15

I guess Europeans don’t believe in rational expectations. (I suppose irrational exuberance and rational expectations don’t exactly go hand-in-hand…)

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 07:54:11

Bottom callers will keep saying real estate prices “may bottom out by the middle of this year” right up until the year they are finally right.

 
 
 
Comment by arlingtonva
Comment by NOVAwatcher
2008-02-17 06:58:08

That made my morning!

 
Comment by jingle
2008-02-17 07:07:00

That is absolutely hilarious….because it is true. It is just that simple.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-17 07:49:55

The last 10 slides had me laughing my rear-end off. Holy cow. Thanks Arlington. I will be passing that along.

 
 
Comment by Beer and Cigar Guy
2008-02-17 07:38:55

THanks for that link it is friggin’ AWESOME! I printed the pages and I’m going to use it as a textbook for some of the slow-people at work.

 
Comment by auger-inn
2008-02-17 07:49:36

I hope the MSM picks up on this one, friggin fabulous! It should be emailed to every idiot involved in this mess from Senators to Realtors!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 08:04:56

“What am I supposed to tell my villagers?”

Have to share that with some Norwegian friends…

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 08:12:02

RSG = “Really Sorry Guys”

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2008-02-17 10:42:06

Professor,

RSG = “Really Sh*tty Guys”

 
 
Comment by peter m
2008-02-17 08:35:52

Subprime explained through Google Docs:

really expalins the entire CDO mess in a form easily understandable so that even the most dim-witted 2nd grade level functionally illiterate joe shmoe can understand what the f*ck happened in the arcane world of cdo’s traches, securitations, bond insurers gettin whacked, ect, and how it affects the average lives of even the lowest bottom rung proletarian. . Should be posted up /printed in every newspaper cartoon feature or on every internet MSM news flash.

 
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2008-02-17 08:45:14

Stick people & “War” language for economic descriptions…we’re almost there… ;-)

 
Comment by sd renter
2008-02-17 09:52:56

That was gooood. I had to pass it along.

Comment by Kim
2008-02-17 11:03:36

Me too. That was hysterical.

 
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2008-02-17 10:43:57

This explains it better than any attempt that has been made by our MSM. Very funny.

Thanks for the laugh arlingtonva.

 
Comment by Lurkeeloo
2008-02-17 13:18:30

Very cool. I passed it around as well. Thanks.

Comment by Gatorfan
2008-02-17 15:54:02

I sent it to a dozen people. I hope this makes its rounds; it’s brilliant.

 
 
Comment by Sally OMaley
2008-02-17 22:35:18

Super funny! Thanks!

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2008-02-17 05:51:25

Neither Democrats nor Republicans have yet devised their platforms for the big campaign of 2008, but both parties are long experienced at pulling our legs with their promises.

One of the most notorious was the Democratic Party in its campaign of 1932. Incumbent president Herbert Hoover was fighting hard to overwhelm the economic depression that had set in after the stock market crash of 1929 and he started many of the programs that later became known as “The New Deal.”

The Democrats claimed to be shocked at the excesses of the federal government. We’re not kidding! Here are the first three planks of the platform that helped get FDR into the White House:

“1/ We advocate: An immediate and drastic reduction of governmental expenditures by abolishing useless commissions and offices, consolidating departments and bureaus and eliminating extravagance, to accomplish a saving of not less than 25 per cent to the cost of Federal government.

“2/ Maintenance of the national credit by a Federal budget annually balanced. . .

“3/ A sound currency to be maintained at all Hazards. . . ”

The voters were desperate in 1932 and they bought the Democrats’ promises hook, line, and sinker. Before Franklin Roosevelt had figured out where the White House bathrooms were he was doing the opposite of what had been promised.

What will the Democrats (and Republicans) offer for the campaign of 2008? BEWARE! The promises are only wind.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-17 06:05:23

But they are promising “change”! Surely, change must be good.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 07:00:34

“The promises are only wind.”

I personally prefer when wind is leaned into rather than created…

 
Comment by Yo Momma
2008-02-17 10:55:51

We will repeat the same mistake with “New Deal: Part deux”.

WW2 and major consumer sacrifice, buying war bonds, rationing, and industrialization of wartime effort brought us out. The New Deal was a joke and a populist argument among Keynesian thinkers who believe that dropping money out of helicopters and government control of the free market can buy you out of a catastrophe.

Comment by CA renter
2008-02-18 04:36:58

Ever talked to someone who actually lived through the Great Depression?

I’ve never heard a single survivor say anything even remotely similar to what you claim to be true.

Comment by CA renter
2008-02-18 04:39:04

Clarification: regarding the New Deal.

Every GD survivor I’ve ever known thoroughly praises FDR’s efforts to help them when things were REALLY bad.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-17 05:54:02

You’d better get there quickly, before all of those rich musicians. Bring your tambourine and bongos. This one will go fast.

http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/rfs/576442492.html

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-02-17 08:23:40

The ganja, mon, what about the ganja?

 
Comment by zeropointzero
2008-02-17 11:23:38

“We’re getting the band back together …..”

 
 
Comment by Bad Chile
2008-02-17 05:58:40

Warning: Two articles from the Boston Globe that may cause the reader’s head to explode….

“God isn’t making any more oceans”
http://www.boston.com/realestate/news/articles/2008/02/17/long_views_short_money/

(Auction for 20 condos in a 81 unit new development - IN REVERE -of which 22 units have sold in two years.)

And another winner from the Boston Globe, about a couple that purchased a home from a family member in ‘98 for $155k, then jacked out $330k of “equity”, and now are in bankruptcy, and “I want to keep my [edit: WaMu's] house”.

http://www.boston.com/realestate/news/articles/2008/02/17/seeking_protection/?page=1

Comment by WT Economist
2008-02-17 06:18:23

“Then, between 2001 and 2004, they refinanced three times, ultimately borrowing $330,000. They used much of the money to repay thousands of dollars in credit card debts.”

Here it is again. Ben, what position is the MSM taking in these articles. This couple blew $330,000, and they are held up as the example of the kind of people who would be helped by mortgage bailouts.

Can’t they find anyone with a better excuse to be classified as a victim?

Comment by Ben Jones
2008-02-17 06:26:21

Its a good example of how reactions differ in various states. IMO Massachusetts is the worst in dealing with this bubble. They whine, pass stupid laws, anything to keep prices up and stand around complaining that things are unaffordable. Keep it up Globe, we’ll remember the hypocracy.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-17 06:30:09

And what is the yearly budget in MA for “affordable housing”? That is the part that chaps my Lereah. Money is going out to make housing affordable and now more money is going out to keep housing from becoming affordable. I have yet to see an MSM drone point that out. There is a reason that all major newspapers are drying up. They offer nothing of value.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by nhz
2008-02-17 07:17:14

Money is going out to make housing affordable and now more money is going out to keep housing from becoming affordable.
OMG, sounds like the Netherlands!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 08:14:09

“Money is going out to make housing affordable and now more money is going out to keep housing from becoming affordable.”

My car drives really funny when I step on the brake pedal and the accelerator at the same time.

 
 
Comment by safe_as_apartments
2008-02-17 06:41:11

This is a major reason why MA is going to grind down slowly over the next decade. (The other reasons are a lack of jobs, declining population, and an largely retiring population.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by safe_as_apartments
2008-02-17 06:37:12

I think these cramdowns (where the judge reduces the principle owed) may actually speed the downturn in MA. The banks are much more reluctant than the judge to lower the asking price of a foreclosure. Now, if the judge “short sells” the house back to the original owner, new comps are set immediately.

 
Comment by mgnyc
2008-02-17 07:24:47

and we are supposed to feel sorry for these serial refiers

let them rot in the street for all i care

330k??? wtf is the money ?

Comment by Frank Giovinazzi
2008-02-17 07:51:09

We have direct dealing with three borrowers who refi’ed, built a house for themselves “down home” [2 in Georgia, 1 in W. Virginia] and are now in default.

All three refuse to sell new home to get current on mortgage.

All three would easily be candidates for a victim article [poor, uneducated, minority].

All three will walk away to a brand new, paid for home.

All three gamed the system, but if you were to look at them, you’d have to say, “yeah, crazy like a fox.”

While many middle class victims just spent the refi money on lifestyle, an unknown percentage are walking on sunshine.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ric
2008-02-17 08:23:46

I just don’t understand this. Isn’t a refi a recourse loan and in that case, the lender can go after the new house down home? No?

 
Comment by Frank Giovinazzi
2008-02-17 09:09:49

ric, you’re probably correct, but right now they are getting away with it. Time is going to tell whether or not the lenders pursue collections on people who’ve walked away from $100k-$500k refi’s. For the most part the defaulters are going to be judgment-proof, due to the large size of the default.

But I’ll also bet that some deeds are already in other names. ie., spouses, offspring, etc.

 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2008-02-17 13:16:45

Things do need an enema don’t they?

 
 
 
Comment by Potential Buyer
2008-02-17 09:02:55

While this couple were busy using their home ATM, I wonder if they ever questioned their quality of life - having to work 3 jobs to pay back that debt. Oh, and still not achieving that!

I guess they could sell their brand new car that’s paid for from that ATM.

 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-17 06:26:30

“Kim says she and her husband share responsibility for what happened. Lenders gave and the Canfields took. They accepted a larger loan than they could afford to repay. They didn’t take the time to understand the terms. And they worked with companies that encouraged and allowed them to make bad decisions.”

I don’t see any mention of either of these people having an illness so we can slam them the way they deserve to be slammed. That article is still trying to portray these pieces of garbage as victims. And yes they are garbage because they have lived like g-damned fools and now expect that everybody else should bail them out. Let them rot and maybe they will learn a lesson. Or better yet, allow the bankruptcy judges to perform cramdowns on primary mortgages and lock up the whole filthy industry. There is definitely a Stupidity Bubble in this country.

Comment by Quirk
2008-02-17 06:27:56

Well, what do you expect? It’s MASSACHUSETTS! If Disney had a theme park there it would be called Entitlementland.

Comment by WT Economist
2008-02-17 06:48:07

I don’t think the MSM is feeding a sense of entitlement by holding up people like these as the “victims.”

I think they are telling the reader that the purported victims usually aren’t victims after all.

I recall that in the 1980s, advocates for the homeless always came up with a family that had been the victim of hard luck as an example of why the homeless needed to be helped. It was PR, as there were few of these. The majority of the homeless were drug addicts.

By in effect showing the drug addicts as the people who say they need help, the MSM seems to be doing the opposite over and over again.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by auger-inn
2008-02-17 07:15:05

Here is a relevant excerpt from the bi-monthly privateer newsletter/analysis. It usually touches on housing because of it’s relevance to the credit debacle but he doesn’t spend a lot of time covering it. This section followed one on the bailouts. http://www.the-privateer.com

“What Of The Americans Who Do Not “Dream”?:
Consider an individual or a family - and there are millions in the US and throughout the world - who were
not caught up in the borrowing frenzy of the past decade. Consider someone who read the “fine print” on
the subprime mortgage paper - realised that they would not be able to service the mortgage when the low
interest rate “grace period” came to an end - and refused the offer. Consider a family who watched the
housing bubble from the outside, knew it could not last, and worked to put together a substantial down
payment to be used when the inevitable bust followed the boom and house prices declined. Consider a
man or woman who paid off their credit card bills in full at the end of the month. Consider the people
who did not borrow against the “value” of their house and consume the proceeds.
Who are the people who have been ignored in all the frantic “rescue packages” pouring out of legislative
chambers over the past eight months? Who are the people whose fiscal rectitude is now being penalised?
Who are those who are now rightly outraged as they see profligacy rewarded and responsibility sneered
at? They are precisely the people who are the backbone of any REAL economy. The ones who produce
more than they consume. The ones who save and invest instead of borrowing and spending.”

 
 
 
 
Comment by Craven Moorehead
2008-02-17 07:32:20

“Revere Beach is a totally different marketplace from the City of Revere,” said Bob Upton of Century 21 North Shore. “The City of Revere is more of a working-class area. Revere Beach is becoming a little more upscale, and buyers are coming from across the country to look at Revere.”

Dry heave. As is predictable, the Globe is cranking up the springtime REIC pump-and-dump stories. This one is a good one.

Revere Beach is a crap hole, and anyone from the area knows this. I grew up on the North Shore. In the 70’s and 80’s, Revere Beach is where blue collar white kids did burnouts up and down the street all night in Mustangs and IROCs, and crashed stolen cars onto the beach.

Nowadays, it’s Dominicans and others from the Caribbean and Central America, droning around in low riders all night long looking for a fight or a Honda to steal. MS13 is moving into this area. It is the same terrible hole it always was, but now it speaks Spanish and has more firepower.

Revere Beach is no place to live and these monstrosity condo complexes they built recently will decline in price for YEARS as the few remaining morons and elderly hold outs die off or move out of town. Then this entire area will be Section 8.

Comment by FB wants a do over
2008-02-17 09:11:46

That’s friggin hilarious. I remember when we all used to joke about the big haired chics from Revere.

Also, the r is silent so Revere is pronounced Reveaaaa. My caaa was stolen in Reveaaaa. hahahaha

 
 
 
Comment by Bye FL
2008-02-17 06:00:57

I am seeing houses in Port Saint Lucie, FL drop to $80/foot for small old houses and $95/foot for nice newer houses. $200k now gets you an upper middle class 4/2.5/2 ~2150 living square foot house.

In fact, you can get a house from the bank “as-is” for $75k and itll be 1000 to 1500 living square feet. Just a year ago, those houses were $125k! I remember looking and youd be hard pressed to find anything for $100/foot, period. Now theres plenty that are less than that and much nicer!

Vacent lots are still overpriced at $30k to $50k for quarter acre lots. What did they cost before the bubble? around $15k? This means there is more room yet for house prices to drop further. Those $95/foot nice homes could be $60/foot and those $80/foot older homes could be $48/foot at the bottom!

Would be really sweet to be able to get one of those starter houses for around $50k and possibly as low as $25k for a fixer upper. Nicer new homes should be had for around $100k!

Comments on this please :)

Comment by Blue Skye
2008-02-17 06:16:39

I thought you wanted to grow apples in PA?

Comment by mgnyc
2008-02-17 07:11:37

i don’t think he knows what he wants except a 50k or less crapshack

Comment by Moman
2008-02-17 15:30:22

Need to get a college degree too. Oh wait, those are for losers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Quirk
2008-02-17 06:25:33

What good is any of it if the only place you’ll ever find work is Red Lobster?

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-17 06:32:42

Their little garlic cheese biscuits are fantastic.

Comment by mgnyc
2008-02-17 07:28:38

lol it is a runnning joke with my wife about taking her to red lobster.

scary place to eat in queens

just like all the tgifmcfunsterbeeoutbackchilecrap

2500 calories for $10 and the adult onset diabetes is free!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-02-17 08:25:38

All your pancreas are belong to us.

 
 
Comment by exeter
2008-02-17 11:25:03

Yeah but they dropped the deepfried mushrooms w/horseradish dipping sauce. I haven’t been back to RL since.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Michael Fink
2008-02-17 06:32:54

PSL is going to be declared a national disaster area as a result of this bubble bursting.

PSL is in constant competition with Palm Beach County, it has to be MUCH cheaper to live up there then in PBC, because there are simply not enough (not even close) higher paying jobs to support the home prices. I fully expect that much of PBC will be down to 100/sq/ft (or lower) in the next 2 years, and, in that case, PSL will have to be even cheaper then that to attract residents. There’s very little reason to live in PSL (for most people) at even 90/sq/ft when you can live in PBC for 100, and most people will not do it.

I wouldn’t jump into that market yet, you have to see how S. FL plays out before you have an idea of the real “value” of homes up in PSL.

Frankly, theres just SO much inventory up there, it would not surprise me at all to see the bulldozers up there plowing under lots and lots of homes (see: Texas) in the next few years.

I don’t think that 100/sq/ft is overpaying, but, at the same time, I wouldn’t want to be so dependent on the fate of the S. FL housing market. PSL could just (and may very well) collapse entirely; there’s almost nothing to keep it there, other then it’s proximity to S. FL.

Comment by Quirk
2008-02-17 16:18:25

Dude, no house in PSL is worth what they are asking for it.

 
 
Comment by GotRocks
2008-02-17 06:35:23

If you do get down to the $50k or below range (which I consider VERY possible out there before this mess is over), then why bother with windstorm insurance (just have a liability policy…if possible - or maybe just don’t get a dog). That, coupled with real low property taxes, may make it cheap to live in Florida again…for those who want to.

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-17 07:34:34

But but but, the bank will require insurance on your 103% loan! Why, you would have to have FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS saved!

Oh, the humanity!

Comment by GotRocks
2008-02-17 08:47:22

I had meant to say pay with cash, which I suspect many of us on this blog could do. Obviously any loan will require insurance.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-17 12:23:32

I liked your suggested plan enough to lookup PSL in Google Earth. The blue smudge that was water next to the green smudge looked promising as the program was still downloading imagery. (My wife would never accept the temperature of the North West where I would prefer living. I made the mistake of saying, Hey look! It’s Florida! She said, Oooh, Florida. Let’s move to Florida! - eek. never start in the middle in this kind of conversation ;)

Unfortunately, the next thing that focused was the extremely dense housing development road network. Looked like a curvy circuit board. Kind of scary. (A whole city of discharging equity capacitors?)

There weren’t many pictures of housing on Google Earth. Lots of nice nature shots. Makes sense. If I want to see house pictures and get trampled I can log into a real estate site. Well, there was one, titled “Californification”, and another one showing damage after two hurricanes in the space of 3 weeks.

The city looked nice though.

 
 
 
 
Comment by nhz
2008-02-17 07:35:26

sounds like four to five times cheaper than current EU (UK, Netherlands) prices. In my country a small ’starter home’ costs $250-300K, and the worst fixer-uppers start around $225-250K. That ‘upper middle class home’ would set you back at least $ 750K. And that is while income is significantly lower than in the US; there is one major difference though, at least almost everyone still qualifies for a mortgage in Europe :(

No surprise they are still selling FL homes to EU buyers …

 
Comment by Tim
2008-02-17 07:38:06

So are you thinking of changing your name to “Hello Florida”? Assuming you are not looking for employment and are free to move wherever you want, I would focus on finding a place that provides you the most opportunties to do what you love most rather than on finding the cheapest place to live wherever that may be.

 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2008-02-17 09:29:28

Bye FL previously mentioned western PA as the destination of choice. I’m sure most are familiar with what’s available in the Pittsburgh and Youngstown areas. Better yet, Central PA has some good prices on land. More specifically, towns surrounding Centralia like Ashland might be a good place to start looking.

http://www.offroaders.com/album/centralia/centralia.htm

Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-17 12:20:09

looks enticing. yikes

 
 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-17 06:09:03

Holy moly! Somebody that is still in Minnesota needs to explain this to me. They want $359,900 for a small condo in Lake City? The world has truly gone freaking bonkers. I know it has a “view” of the lake. Good lord.

http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/rfs/576465770.html

Comment by veloblues
2008-02-17 06:52:55

You are dumbfounded because you are not a real estate professional knowledgeable about the local market. There are literally tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of uber-wealthy Europeans eager to by condos in Minnesota.

Plus, once those $600 checks start hitting the mailbox, the market is going to take off and return to double-digit growth.

(it’s too early in the morning to figure out emoticons)

VB

 
Comment by Tim
2008-02-17 07:26:30

There are over 10,000 lakes in Minnesota. A view of one is not that rare. I am more surprised by the lack of pics. Who would take the time to make a post and not add pics? Would anyone really respond to an add that just has a few sentences on how great the place is without pics? I would just assume it looks like crap.

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2008-02-17 06:10:27

I want to apologize for creating a divisive thread yesterday. I’d prefer we all focus our hater-powers on the fed, war on savers, agflation, erosion of the dollar, Sean Snaith etc.

Group hug!

Comment by Quirk
2008-02-17 06:26:44

Apology accepted…although I have no idea what the hell you’re talking about.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2008-02-17 06:27:37

You’ll notice I didn’t touch that one. You got to have some sense of what’s relevant. That one wasn’t.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-17 06:42:40

I agree. I think one of the most relevant questions that keeps going through my mind is, “how long can mortgage rates stay this low?” That is the one thing that has been so surprising. If the treasury market takes a hit it seems that this would finally drive rates up to reasonable levels. Who in their right mind would still be lending on 30-year mortgages at under 6%?

http://wallstreetexaminer.com/?p=2301

Comment by nhz
2008-02-17 07:21:38

30-year mortgages in my country are back below 5% again (effectively 2.5%) thanks to the US subprime disaster (at least, that’s the official explanation). Almost everyone can apply and no downpayments required either. And a 5-year fixed rate I/O loan goes for a little over 4% now over here (2% effectively). If anything, what happened over the last 1-2 years in the US has driven mortgage rates in Europe DOWN and not up.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 07:32:20

“Almost everyone can apply and no downpayments required either.”

Sounds like your country is trying hard to relive the Tulipmania era. As we have learned in the good ole U.S.A., there is nothing that does much of a better job of driving home prices to levels that almost nobody can afford than eliminating downpayment requirements.

 
Comment by nhz
2008-02-17 09:03:26

I would love to believe that it is just a rerun of tulipmania (that lasted only a few years …), but unfortunately this time most of Old Europe is playing along in the pyramid game, and in Netherlands we are getting close to 20 years of bubble pricing - this mania really seems to last forever :(

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 07:05:01

“I want to apologize for creating a divisive thread yesterday.”

Congratulations!

 
 
Comment by danni
2008-02-17 06:27:53

As LI economy slides, the newly poor seek assistance
Newsday
02/16/08
by Michael Amon

http://tinyurl.com/yvoh4e

Increased requests for government assistance and longer lines at soup kitchens “are the first indicators that you may be showing economic difficulties,” Kamer said. Citing the subprime mortgage crisis, 30 percent increases in gasoline and home heating oil prices, and rising grocery prices, Kamer said: “In past recessions, it has always been the lowest income workers who line up at the soup kitchens and who apply for food stamps. I think this economic slowdown is hitting the middle class and that’s a bit frightening.”

At the Island Heart Food Pantry in Middle Island, co-director Dennis Murphy said he has seen an increase in what he calls “the newly poor.”

“We’re getting more of the relatively well-dressed man or woman with a newish car but say they have no prospects of a new job,” Murphy said. “They’re embarrassed to be here.”

As always, the comments to the Newsday articles are often hysterical be sure to take a peek. Newsday has been regularly releasing stories that have a doom and gloom flavor to it. It’s refreshing after 7 years of the “Golden Years”. I still don’t see the problem sinking into the thick skulls of most middle/so called upper middle class LIers but it’s certainly getting increasingly difficult to avoid the reports.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-17 06:48:09

Hey danni, what is with Long Islanders? The level of arrogance just astounds me. I hate when I take a subway in the morning that has to stop at Penn Station. All of the white collar trash getting on is just awful. These are people with no manners and attitudes that make you want to ring their necks. They will run over a little old lady to get to their train. A lot of that comes straight from the LIRR (and some from Jersey Transit). But the Islanders seem like a particularly vile set of people. And their real estate is “just plain gold”.

Comment by danni
2008-02-17 07:20:54

Hubbie is one of the Long Islanders who takes the LIRR but since he’s blue collar electrician he has lovely manners.;)

I think I’ve said this before but I’ll say it again…THIS is not the LI of my childhood, even my Mom and Dad are a little stunned by the change. Neighbors are not neighbors that you spend time with and help out, they are someone to compete with now. Houses are no longer a modest place that you maintain with a hammer and nails, a can of paint, a lawn mower and some sweat…no, it’s a show piece that you hire someone to make it the talk of the block, with silly Dr. Suess bushes on the lawn and plastic looking siding with those oh-so-perfect giant front windows so the neighbors can see your tacky chandelier and second floor balcony.

I have a dream, NYCityBoy, I have a dream that all the SUV-driving, old-lady body checkin’, it’s a good time to buy spoutin’ Long Islanders will lose their shirts and go away!!!!! OR, being I am an understanding soul, they will learn from their lesson and live a life of affordability.

So far, my campaign to end Long Island stupidity and arrogance hasn’t been to successful but I’ll keep plugging away!!!

 
Comment by vmaxer
2008-02-17 07:23:45

“And their real estate is “just plain gold”.”

You got that right.

Where I used to live ( Huntington, sold in 2005) it was a common delusion, amongst residents, that Huntington was “special” and that prices would never drop because, “everybody wants to live in Huntington”. Although I lived there for a couple decades, I never understood the attitude. Property taxes are amongst the highest on Long Island and the roads are overcrowded. Most of the houses are old ( 40-50 yrs +) and need renovation. Although I’ve seen listing prices come down some(10-15%), the asking prices are still obscene. Property taxes in Huntington are typically between 10-12K/yr. Unless you live over by the train station and “projects”, and have worry about things like “home invasions”. If I was a young person just starting out, I’d leave Long Island. It’s full aging baby boomer’s looking to retire off the back’s of young people, by selling them overpriced houses and saddling them with huge mortgage debts.

 
Comment by danni
2008-02-17 07:39:38

NYCityBoy,
I wrote a lengthy reply to you where I ranted belegerently about the change of Long Island over the past few decades, the insanity of their “entitlement” and I went off about the damn Dr. Suess bushes in front of their houses……

I’m spent.

But I will say, my crusade against the Jones’ and what they have done to my hometown island shall burn feverently in my heart. And if you hear of a caped woman running around on LI, putting bumper stickers on SUVs that say “I’m in debt up to my eyeballs, somebody help me!!!”, or a crazy lady offering 180k for a Mc Mansion, it is ME……Super Danni!!!

Comment by xyz
2008-02-17 09:59:14

Funny, millions of people learned to read with Dr. Seuss’s books but many can’t spell his name.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by danni
2008-02-17 10:37:13

smart ass

 
Comment by Desertdweller
2008-02-17 12:29:15

LOL (smartass)
Super Danni!
Expect to see you on tv news soon.

 
 
 
Comment by reuven
2008-02-17 08:51:22

I grew up on LI. My parents still live there. All Long Islanders ever talk about is Real Estate and “how much their house is worth”. Everyone is very shallow. Worse than LA!

Comment by Quirk
2008-02-17 16:10:26

And when they do stick a young person with their albatross, where do they go? Sadly, Florida.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by oc-ed
2008-02-17 06:32:42

From the NYTimmy today,

Arcane Market Is Next to Face Big Credit Test

By GRETCHEN MORGENSON
Published: February 17, 2008

Few Americans have heard of credit default swaps, arcane financial instruments invented by Wall Street about a decade ago. But if the economy keeps slowing, credit default swaps, like subprime mortgages, may become a household term.

http://tinyurl.com/2lgn3q

Comment by IllinoisBob
2008-02-17 07:41:05

Warren Buffet is 100% right! When Berkshire bought General RE, he stripped out all the derivative contracts (didn’t TRUST ‘em). The above NYT article illuminates was Warren was preaching YEARS ago. Scary characteristics of the contracts are they are totally unregulated, no regular posting of prices (like on the NYSE), the seller can palm off the contract to a 3rd party without notification (like a homeowner buying insurance from Allstate & they sell it off & you get pennies on the $ if the place burns down).

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 07:51:31

“Scary characteristics of the contracts …”

Sounds like a scam market…

 
 
Comment by combotechie
2008-02-17 07:50:12

These derivities are the source of much of the recently created “thin-air” money destined to disappear.
The disappearance of this phantom money will make the real stuff (cash and cash equivilents) that much more valuable, IMHO.

Comment by combotechie
2008-02-17 08:34:34

It always amazed me how two parties taking opposite positions in a zero sum game could both claim a profit, which is the case in many of these hedge funds.
Nobody seems to question this magical economic feat.

 
 
Comment by Hoz
2008-02-17 08:45:18

Once again the Times is 10 days behind the news.

Insight: CDS market may create added risks

By Satayjit Das

Published: February 5 2008 15:31 | Last updated: February 5 2008 15:31

In May 2006, Alan Greenspan, the former Federal Reserve chairman, noted: “The credit default swap is probably the most important instrument in finance. … What CDS did is lay-off all the risk of highly leveraged institutions – and that’s what banks are, highly leveraged – on stable American and international institutions.”

The reality may prove different….

As the credit crisis deepens, the risk of actual defaults becomes real. The CDS market will be tested and may be found wanting.

CDS contracts may not actually improve the overall stability and security of the financial system but actually create additional risks.”

“The writer is a risk consultant and author of Traders, Guns & Money: Knowns and Unknowns in the Dazzling World of Derivatives”
http://tinyurl.com/2b22ce
FT

If you have not adjusted positions accordingly, it is probably to late now. “…Investment based on genuine long-term expectation is so difficult to-day as to be scarcely practicable. He who attempts it must surely lead much more laborious days and run greater risks than he who tries to guess better than the crowd how the crowd will behave; and, given equal intelligence, he may make more disastrous mistakes. There is no clear evidence from experience that the investment policy which is socially advantageous coincides with that which is most profitable. It needs more intelligence to defeat the forces of time and our ignorance of the future than to beat the gun….” John Maynard Keynes

 
Comment by measton
2008-02-17 19:58:43

The question I have is the same as the one I have for subprime.

Where the F was our government?
Why was there no regulation?
Why would you allow a system like this to exist?
Either - Require those buying insurance to actually own the bonds, or at the very least make those who buy insurance contracts value those at toilet paper levels.
How many Hedge funds used assets like this as collateral to leverage their other bets???

Al Quida must feel really inadequate after reading about this.

 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-02-17 06:49:47

I want to congratulate the platinum bulls. I have stood aside and watched it explode over $2000.

http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/PL/W

I wonder if the plat/paladium bulls have an exit point. I am seriously considering shorting plat as I believe the vertical move is overextended. Long term I am still bullish on plat but think it could pull back 400 or so. Any plat traders want to comment?

Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-17 08:30:33

My average price per ounce of platinum is around $1100. I’m not selling any for the forseeable future. I buy some of that metal sparingly and my next purchase will be sometime in March or April. I imagine a big correction in platinum prices is due, but not before the next interest rate cut.

I am happy that gold came down to around $902 (since I bought a gold Philharmonic coin yesterday). Either platinum must come down to about $1800 or gold must go up to $1050. Methinks gold will go up to $1050 prior to the next interest rate cuts. Talk is that on March 18 there will be another federal funds rate cut. But I suspect that will be the last one for this cycle and the rate will be unchanged for the rest of this calendar year.

But even after rates go back up the next crisis to handle will be much higher energy costs due to shortages of crude oil and natural gas. That will be significantly known starting sometime between now and 2012. This will be bullish for precious metals and push platinum above $5,000 per ounce, silver above $50 per ounce, and gold above $2,500 per ounce.

Comment by sd renter
2008-02-17 10:10:20

Bill,

I know 2 really shrewd guys who have all of thier money in Gold. They got in EARLY.
I got in Gold stocks at about $500 and just cashed out most of them 2 weeks ago for a nice return. The trouble is I only had 10% of my net worth in there.

I’m regretting 2 things. One-not putting at least half of my net worth in gold and two, cashing out. My one gold stock wasn’t keeping pace with GLD.

Are you in GLD, real gold or gold stocks? Thanks.

Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-17 12:06:01

sd renter, i’m in real precious metals in the bullion form. I like to control the possession. Got a few hiding places out west to keep it for darker days.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-17 12:18:17

sd renter, 10% in precious metals is a wise allocation. Things can change on a dime.

Within the next ten years the Federal government will be forced to become smaller and shed a lot of the bureaucracy. Not because it’s desirable, but because big government is too expensive. We will also see a massive pullout of our military from foreign lands - also forced by economic necessity, not out of desire.

I’m driving at this: precious metals will peak again sometime before that, but not this year and not next year. I’m old enough to remember Paul Volcker and note that without a gold-backed currency he used Milton Friedman monetary economics to control inflation. We will either get on the gold standard or have another dose of Milton Friedman monetary policy (double digit interest rates). The former could keep gold above $1,000 per ounce for decades. The latter could cause gold to crash to $650 for about 15 years.

I keep my eye on the ten year note. It’s way below what the yield was in 1979, so it means people trust treasuries more than precious metals.

Clink! That’s the sound of another ounce of yellow metal dropped into one of my hiding places. Lovely sound.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by flatffplan
2008-02-17 08:34:34

did they fire any gov worker parasites ?
hel no ,they got transfered and then raises

 
Comment by Anthony
2008-02-17 09:43:02

I’m surprised that Plat has gone up so much without Palladium going ballistic. The two are virtually interchangeable, and both are about 10 times rarer than Gold. Yet, palladium is trading at half the price of gold. And, unlike gold, palladium is actually used for something. I think the proper metal to be chasing here is palladium, since the differential between plat and palladium has never been this high. At least, that is how I’m playing it.

Comment by exeter
2008-02-17 11:43:15

Correct Tony. North American Palladium is trading 2x what is was just 3 weeks ago. Unless an external event drives it off the rails, I’m expecting it to double again with possible further gains if it breaks it’s long term ceiling at roughly 12 per share.

Comment by watcher
2008-02-17 12:06:38

I shorted PAL Friday.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by exeter
2008-02-17 13:20:16

In too late on gold, shorting PAL too early. Sounds like a successful trading system. lmao.

 
Comment by FaceDown
2008-02-18 00:35:29

I think South African plat/pal mines are still flooded. If that is the case then Russia is about the only supplier. Given their recent history of leveraging their monopoly in some natural resources to gain the maximum benefit (natural gas last year as an example), I’m betting the price continues to rise for a few more weeks.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-02-17 07:00:36

government hiding more bad economic news:

Due to budgetary constraints, the Economic Indicators service (http://www.economicindicators.gov) will be discontinued effective March 1, 2008.

Economic Indicators.gov is brought to you by the Economics and Statistics Administration at the U.S. Department of Commerce. Our mission is to provide timely access to the daily releases of key economic indicators from the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the U.S. Census Bureau.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 07:17:28

Pretty soon, only rich guys and those who read blogs will have access to information…

BTW, financial transperency, access to high quality information and (relatively) high asset prices go hand in hand.

Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-17 12:20:59

GS, actually information has been getting cheaper and cheaper for decades. However there has been a lot of noise in this information. Just have to use your noggin to filter out the noise.

 
 
Comment by tl
2008-02-17 07:20:25

I saw that. Here’s the link:
http://www.economicindicators.gov/

Does that mean that the info will still be released to the news media while that website is shut down? Or — more ominously — does that mean that the government is no longer going to provide that info to anyone?

Comment by watcher
2008-02-17 07:26:43

They will no longer compile and release the data, just like they did with M3. All economic information will be filtered through the Ministry of Truth. Big Brother to America; ‘you can’t handle the truth’.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 07:48:38

How’d that plan work out for the Soviet Union?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by krazy bill
2008-02-17 14:09:23

“Tufta”:
“The GULAG generated informal social groupings of the criminal prisoners with the patterns of behaviour, that later , starting from the end of the 1940-s, became typical phenomena of the “shadow economy” of the Soviet Union and contributed to the final collapse of the system. The most notorious is the practice of “tufta,” (presenting unreal economic reports and at the same time the forging the visibility of the productive result in different spheres).”

.doc file
http://tinyurl.com/2tepd8

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Tim
2008-02-17 07:12:35

There was an earlier thread that discussed whether securizations in and of themselves were problematic. I would like to address that since that is how I spent the majority of my life the last few years. The concept is simple. Take one or more debt instruments (loans, munibonds, etc) and place them into a trust which issues certificates of participation (i.e., interests in the loans). As part of the process the pieces intended to be sold to the public are normally credit enhanced in the form of a letter of credit or insurance policy from a credit enhancer such as MBIA or Ambac (which credit enhancement basically provides the enhancer will pay debt service, i.e., principal and interest payment, shortfalls), or credit enhancement is in the form of a senior/subordinate trust structure, i.e., all principal and interest coming in goes first to pay the Class A Certificates, then Class B, etc. Also liquidity is usually provided in the form of a standby bond purchase agreement or the like which generally provides that if the interests sold to public are tendered back to the Trust, the liquidity provider will buy them if they cannot be remarketed. There are many legitimate reasons for doing all this. First investment banks can get a large portion of the debt off their books, or at least free up cash, by selling the majority of the interests to investors which allows them to use the money coming in for more profitable pursuits. Second, it allows them to take advantage of changes in interest rates and variations in maturities in the most efficient way possible. For example, if rates change such that current rates are lower than the rates on the underlying loans, or the loans have long term maturities, the investment banks can create trust stuctures to do things such as have the senior pieces coming out of the trust bear interest at a weekly floating rate with the right of the holders to put them back once a week, and keep the residual. A simple example would be a 10 million dollar loan at 7% interest and a 30 year maturity. The investment banks could slice and dice this in such a manner that it could sell 9.9 million in senior pieces out to the public with credit enhancement and liquidity bearing a weekly floating rate such as 4%, while retaining a 100k residual which would bear interest at an amount equal to the interest on the note less the interest paid to the weekly floaters (i.e., 300k per annum) less transaction costs such as attorney, trustee, credit enhancer and liquidity provider fees. There are many other advantages but many are deal and tax specific and would take too long to explain. In summary, these structures, when used correctly, have a legitimate purpose in that they generate profit by using debt in a more market efficient manner. The real problem is not one in the securitizations themselves, but in the estimation of default on the underlying instruments. The rating agencies, credit enhancers and liquidity providers got their modeling completely wrong in many cases. In deals that are enhanced via senior/subordination rather than a third party credit enhancer, defaults have risen in some deals that are causing the senior pieces to have debt service shortfalls, and for those that are credit enhanced via a third party credit enhancer, the enhancers are taking bigger hits than aniticipated which is causing them to be downgraded or put on credit watch due to cash problems.

I did not work on subprime structures. Rather, mine involved municipal bonds. The default rate with respect to munis has not really changed as a result of the housing bust. Yet, my structures are being pulled down as a result of the entire system collapsing. In short, securitizations have legitimate purposes and will continue to play a legitmate role in our financial system going forward. It was the underestimation of mortgage defaults that is bringing the house of cards down. This will get worked out eventually, but not without pain.

Comment by Tim
2008-02-17 07:58:46

I guess the moral of the story is that those that created the structures didnt necessarily do so with bad motives, nor was the bubble a necessary consequence. Rather, risk was not appropriately identified and managed in some of the permutations.

Comment by auger-inn
2008-02-17 08:51:28

Any chance the moral of the story morphs into “churning financial instruments for profit is a non-productive activity and we should focus on re-building our manufacturing base for long term profits and stability”? You know, as far as Wall street and the IB’s are concerned?

Comment by Tim
2008-02-17 09:04:44

I disagree with an implication that its unproductive activity, although it can certainly be abused in such a manner. Many times the sponsors of the Trust are companies themselves that are holding debt, and can become more profitable by reorganizing such debt. Its no different than refi’ing a mortgage to take advantage of changes in interest rates or to satisfy financial covenants with revolving credit lines. It can be used to increase efficiency and lower rates, thus, the companies have more money to invest in making products. Companies not only make products, but hold lots of debt instruments. Keeping interest rates as low as possible, and reconfiguring such debt without a complete refunding, through secondary market transactions and derivatives is valuable.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-17 08:03:00

Um, how many municipal bonds were expected to be paid from the increased tax income from ever rising property prices and rising populations?

Comment by auger-inn
2008-02-17 08:34:13

My question as well.

 
Comment by Tim
2008-02-17 08:57:55

Each Issuer, or Borrower to the extent that a conduit structure was used such that it was noncourse to the Issuer, has its own exposure. Some greater than others. I cant go too much in the details as I have access to information that would be considered confidential, but the default rates in what I do have not experienced a significant uptick. That’s not to say they wont in the future. This is not uncommon as even FGIC is considering (or being forced into) saving its muni-side by splitting its muni and subprime operations because of the divergence in the markets.

 
 
Comment by jingle
2008-02-17 08:03:47

Tim, thank you, that is good color.

I have a friend who worked at C-BASS, a NY mortgage investment house that bought residential mortgages, sliced and diced them, but kept the BBB and unrated tranches (highest risk). The bottom line was when the loans defaulted, all the different traunch owners had to re-negotiate their interests. The AAA tranches did not automatically get to keep their priorty piece of the pie. The structure gave way to reality and the reality was a severe shortage of cash flow and default on principle. It did not matter so much what the written agreement stated for the original structure.

C-BASS, by the way, folded its tent and let everyone (150 employees) go since they burned $900 million in value into $150 million in ashes. Their two parent companies probably got a nice write down. The bottom line was the fraud in home lending and appraisal valuations did them in. That probably won’t happen in the muni bond business…..unless the municipality was corrupted by the home builders into floating the costs for schools, streets, and sewers no one will use for a long time. Hmmmm…..oops, that does seem to be the cae in a few places like Sacramento. Mello Roos bonds come to mind. Are they considered municipal or private bonds?

Comment by Tim
2008-02-17 09:09:28

I loosely refer to tax-exempt debt on which a municipality is directly on the hook or serves as a conduit to allow for tax-exempt financing as a muni bond, as I have tax-exempt knowledge. Same general structure, but with the added complication of making sure nothing is done that would cause the IRS to challenge the tax-exempt status of the subject debt.

 
Comment by Tim
2008-02-17 10:29:54

It will be interesting to see how what due diligence as to the actual value of the underlying asset will look like in 2010.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 08:18:17

“The default rate with respect to munis has not really changed as a result of the housing bust.”

The default rate on San Diego housing was really low up until the point when the tsunami hit the shore (late last year). Credit market tunamis move at a glacial pace compared to the physical kind out on the open ocean.

Comment by Tim
2008-02-17 09:57:43

True. I didnt mean to imply that the damage was contained and munis were immune. My intent was to point out that bubble aside securizations are a valuable financial tool. Lately ppl have seem to have taken the view that anyone involved with them was greedy and/or had an intent to defraud. It is not the case, although fraud and greed certainly emerged.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 07:14:40

Why it is not always a good time to buy (aka the Japanese problem)…

HOUSING SCENE LEW SICHELMAN
Is there another bubble in the wings?

WASHINGTON – The common perception among economists is that the current housing bubble will be a relatively short-term affair that should see a return to normalcy within the next few years. But according to a new study by two University of Southern California researchers, a bubble of even more monumental proportions lies just ahead.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080217/117.html

Comment by nhz
2008-02-17 07:49:48

After all, not all seniors retire or sell their homes and move to smaller places. Many prefer to age in place and live out their lives in the houses where they’ve built a lifetime of memories. But eventually, as they die off, most of their homes will come on the market.

interesting, because in Europe researchers say that our boomers (who are relatively wealthy like in the US, but on average probably have much better pensions) will remain in their expensive and far-too-big homes for many more years. They are not expected to sell for another 10-20 years. Probably they will keep tapping the equity in the homes but have no incentive to sell, one reason being that smaller homes often have less value-for money (obviously, that is a result of the EU housing bubble). Only those having severe disability problems will have to move, because their grand EU homes are often not suitable for people in wheelchairs etc.
Unlike some US states, most of Europe does not have the problems with extremely high local taxes either (e.g. in Netherlands the property tax for a 1 million home is just a few thousand euros a year, no problem even for those on a small pension).

Comment by zeropointzero
2008-02-17 11:44:17

I’m also concerned about a related issue - at what point do 401k withdrawls from retirees significantly offset 401k contributions in the future (along liquidation of individual stock ownership)?

Any way to track those industry flows? I know there are some mutual fund industry money-flow stats — I’ve seen them referenced before.

You can’t fight demographics.

Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-17 12:49:32

Right. You cannot fight demographics. I think the massive selloff due to aging boomers is going to be around 2016 (boomers working longer, aging slower than previous generations). The last part of the article is a very good one to note: Some states the boomers start downsizing in their mid-50s, such as in California. I expect a big price drop in California houses anytime! The big price drop should have happened already in California starting in 2001 since the oldest boomers were 55 years old in 2001. See my point? Boomers are working longer. They did not save much in their retirement plans, thinking foolishly that real estate is the best way to invest for retirement. Silly boomers!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by rms
2008-02-17 21:30:35

“interesting, because in Europe researchers say that our boomers (who are relatively wealthy like in the US, but on average probably have much better pensions) will remain in their expensive and far-too-big homes for many more years.”

I know a bit about Europe, and “big homes”…really?

Comment by nhz
2008-02-18 03:02:45

sure, big homes are relatively few, especially when you talk about new homes. Boomers are not buying new homes, except for a few that buy custom-built 1M euro plus homes. But the big homes exist in the places where many wealthy boomers live now, in the historical cities. Also, many big farms in the countryside were rebuilt into luxury mansions for this kind of wealthy boomers.

Where I live, about 20% of the inner city is 17-19th century mansions (canal homes etc.) that probably have more living space (4000-8.000 sqft) than the average McMansion. Just 15 years ago, many elderly people were living with one or two persons in these big homes, often with several floors unused; prices were around 75-125K euro then. Lately some of these homes were sold to developers and chopped up in luxury apartments. This causes prices to go up while keeping down the median sales price: instead of one 1M euro home you get four 0.4M euro apartments on the market (the sale to the developer company does not count, it is considered a business deal and kept outside the home price statistics).
Or instead of EUR 5000 monthly rent, which no one in my corner of the country will pay, you get four apartments with about 1500 euro prents, which is about the maximum cost the local market can bear.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-17 13:00:56

There is nothing bad about renting in large corporate apartments. Some of them are very luxurious. And despite lies I see here every once in awhile, you can make improvements in rental apartments. I have. Pictures on walls? Yes. Ceiling fans? Yes! You can be very creative. I lived in two apartment complexes with well equipped fitness rooms, a jacuzzi, and several pools, built in washer and dryer, and so forth. I laugh at those who say they need to buy a house! When I was a mortgage slave, I was living alone in a SFH neighborhood. It was extremely boring!

I expect that if boomers sell off houses and prices go down a lot, the rents will also go down, but more so! There will be a saturation of rentals. A friend of mine has rented a 3 bedroom apartment for several years without having anyone live with him. He likes the space. Nothing wrong with that.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-02-17 14:10:56

Boomers to retire! Retirees to sell oversized houses! It’s a bubble!

Some genius.

 
Comment by Quirk
2008-02-17 16:25:13

You just get the feeling sometimes like the journalists are stealing all our ideas now.

 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-17 07:19:52

Question: The girlfriend was reading the Sunday paper and noticed that Aldi Foods is all of a sudden selling Home Depot-like merchandise: work boots, table saws, and even portable generators.

Why would a discount grocery chain start carrying such merchandise?

My guess: All that Chinese made stuff is in the pipeline - and distributors have got to keep moving it - or else. What better place than the one business that should do well this year - a discount grocer?

Any other guess? It seems a waste of Aldi’s floorspace to sell such stuff when cheap groceries should be more in demand.

Comment by nhz
2008-02-17 07:25:25

I guess this is the same Aldi we have in Europe? They have been selling such stuff for years in their EU shops (e.g. Aldi is famous for relatively cheap computers; until recently customers lined up before the store opened to make sure they could get one). Probably it is part of the business model, to attract new customers with deals on relatively cheap gadgets; they can offer more spectacular discounts on those than on daily grocery items.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-17 07:38:30

Perhaps in Europe, but Aldi’s stores in Chicago have been strictly grocery. They tend to be relatively small stores and are overwhelmingly located in blue collar neighborhoods here. They are the favored haunt of seniors looking to stretch their fixed incomes - but not to buy tools. Plus, we have added many new Home Depots within city limits so additional outlets for tools and equipment really aren’t needed. It’s curious.

Comment by nhz
2008-02-17 07:55:47

If I look in the main shopping street in my Dutch hometown, probably at least 50% of the (officially very different) shops are offering loads of Chinese junk in addition to their normal merchandise. This started about 5 years ago in some discount cosmetics/grocery stores like Kruidvat (part of Hutchison-Whampoa, based in Hong Kong) and has quickly spread to almost every other kind of store. I consider it extremely annoying, because all those stores are starting to look the same inside :(

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by IllinoisBob
2008-02-17 08:01:08

We are flooded with the big box HD outlets around here too! I am 40 miles out in the ex-burgs and there are 3 HD stores within 10 miles. Good luck for Aldi’s if they try that stunt out here.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jingle
2008-02-17 08:09:29

I was listening to a wholesaler of leather computer bags talk about how his profit margin was so high, he would not get hit by the recession. He bought leather computer bags in China for $4.50 and sold them for over $100 in the U.S.

There is only one problem……….if he can make that much profit, soon everyone else will do it! Evidently Aldi’s sees the same opportunity….

 
 
 
Comment by Moman
2008-02-17 16:56:20

Aldi USA is a subsidiary of the German company. They are planning a major expansion. My parents shop there, and for as long as I live, I hope to never step foot in that store as I have some bad memories from the quality of their food products. Some of the stuff isn’t bad deals, but it’s about the same price as the Walmart supercenter.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2008-02-17 07:38:08

ej, the local Goodwill sells a crapload of new Chinese junk products alongside their usual donated used clothing, furniture and gewgaws. It’s ticking the usual customers off. One mentioned to me the other day that they go to Goodwill to hunt for good used goods, not new crap from China. Besides, you can get that crap cheaper at the dollar store anyway.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-17 07:45:56

Palm, it looks like they just have to keep those factories humming. With today’s just-in-time supply networks there’s no way that stuff can be hid away in a warehouse. They don’t care where the stuff is sold - just that they get back the empty 40 and 53 foot containers to fill up again.

 
Comment by Moman
2008-02-17 16:54:50

don’t you mean Harbor Freight Tools? I wouldn’t be caught dead doing heavy work with their tools.

 
 
Comment by RoundSparrow
2008-02-17 09:28:31

Aldi has been selling laptops and other non grocery items for many years here in the USA. This isn’t the oldest, but a 2006 example i could easily find:
http://forums.slickdeals.net/showthread.php?p=4209805

 
Comment by exeter
2008-02-17 11:58:56

Yeah whats up with the retail model these days. Tractor Supply is another oddball chain. They’re popping up everywhere hawking some of the strangest chit you’d never expect in the middle of suburbia. 99% of the people around here wouldn’t know what to do with a lynch pin, draw bar or hay tedder parts if you explained it to them. Also, most of it is chinese and just like wall mart, you’ll a splitting headache from all that chinese junk off gassing formaldehyde.

Comment by Moman
2008-02-17 16:51:36

Is TSC popping up or are neighborhoods popping up around TSC? I love TSC, good place to get stuff but the problem is they cater to the wanna be hobby farmers. As such, their revenue stream is more dependent on economic conditions than the smaller mom-and-pop type places. TSC doesn’t even sell a good chainsaw (Stihl) that almost every mom-and-pop farm store carries. Plus their mowers are the cheapest MTD knockoffs (even some of the nicer lines, like Cub Cadet aren’t any better than the John Deere mowers sold at Home Depot). Most real farmers shop with local people, not places like TSC.

Comment by exeter
2008-02-17 17:17:30

Yeah. For farm supplies they are a joke. They tock alot of nickel and dime junk, cast iron chinese parts and of course the pre-requisite canvas duck coats for retarded suburbanite pretend “farmers”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Moman
2008-02-17 18:46:10

Exeter, I am ROFL. I agree with you on lots of points, and this pretend farming thing is a real sore subject for me. For three years I was unwilling to buy a pickup truck because all the suburbanite pr**ks (rhymes with sicks) who needed one jacked the prices up real high (hell in 2001 a 4WD ext cab loaded truck was only $25k new, to max up about $35k in 2005), and even now I have a hard time enjoying deer hunting because of the same people running 4-wheelers in the woods. You might remember my post from last year ranting about the prevelance of brand-new pickup trucks and designer hunting clothing. I stopped camping because I tired of the suburbanites spending home equity ca$h on camping equipment to sit outside and listen to radio all night and have a fire that gets real high every five minutes each time the jackas& puts another gallon of gasoline on it.

In short, the same people who are the retarded, suburbanite wanna-be John Deere mower driving, F150 leasing idiots.

I think you, Chip, hd74man, and I all from the same fold.

 
Comment by exeter
2008-02-17 19:56:06

beautiful. I could add more but I’d be preaching to the congregation. It’s these same limpwristed ruralfolk/farmer wannabees driving girlie half ton pickups to work wearing a suit to sit in a cubicle all day. Their weekend ride is a Vulva/Audi-cious/bmw or some other Euro Trash. Rural areas in New England are overrun by these sneaker wearing fools. They’re always so damn helpless. They get themselves into stupid situations and beg for a hand. I’ve stopped assisting them when they fawk up.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 07:21:38

Local businesses feeling recession’s chill
U.S. service sector shrank for the first time in five years
By Penni Crabtree
STAFF WRITER
February 17, 2008

If the looming recession had its own song, Mehul Sheth might be humming it to the tune of “Dry Bones.”

Remember the campfire ditty? The toe bone connected to the foot bone, the foot bone connected to the ankle bone …

In San Diego, as indeed across the United States and around the world, the fragile financial interconnectedness of things, taken for granted in good times, stands out starkly when talk turns to recession.

And the steady stream of bad news – the housing slump, the credit crunch and stagnant employment – weighs on the psyches of businesses, workers and consumers.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080217/news_lz1b17recess.html

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-02-17 09:12:27

I want to write a recession cookbook.

Frugal Sue’s eating on a shoestring during the Great Recession:
No Snacks
Chicken broth
Rice
Dried fruit
Nuts
No bakery goods
Paper Plates
Propane hot plate
Pay cash
It’s too early for Gloom and Doom.
Continued later.

Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-17 12:52:38

I intend to spend money like the Devil in the coming bad years. Women, wine, and song! I saved like a monk while the grasshoppers partied the last 8 years or so. A fellow job shopper on line had the signature “save in the good times so you can spend in the bad times.” That’s the line I will live up to.

 
 
 
Comment by dimedropped (Orlando)
2008-02-17 07:30:19

I just received the final plans and spec on a proposed warehouse facility here. I got a call to appraise it from a local bank about 2 months ago but the developers could not get everything together till now.

11,000 sf of 20 foot high flex warehouse space in 2 buildings. Current rents reflect a potential value of about $700,000. Clincher is development costs are $1,100,000. Here we go again.

Commercial is following housing down the drain as the housing development infrastructure collapses so do the ancillary aspects of the market.

Comment by jingle
2008-02-17 08:12:33

How can it cost $100/sf to build a warehouse? That seems absurdly high?

Comment by intheknow
2008-02-17 08:59:47

I would expect that includes the cost of land acquisition, so the actual construction costs would be less than $100/sf. But yeah, the construction costs, even for commercial property, in Florida are amazingly high.

 
Comment by ric
2008-02-17 09:08:50

Someone got raped on land costs.

 
 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-17 07:41:45

I guess New York City isn’t immune from some common sense after all. This is heartening.

http://tinyurl.com/2z5nya

My favorite part is this:
“Then, days before closing on the apartment in October, Ms. Nikonorow’s mortgage broker told her in an e-mail message that she had to take an online course and quiz on the responsibilities of homeownership before receiving a mortgage. The bank said that borrowers need to take the course if they are borrowing more than 80 percent of a home’s value.”

How many subprime fools would have passed a quiz in the past 5 years? It wouldn’t have stopped the foolishness but it might have stripped away a lot of excuses.

Comment by nhz
2008-02-17 07:57:49

I guess someone (like a company owned by Mozillo or similar guy) could offer a free software agent to answer the questions ;-)

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 07:42:18

GAIL MARKSJARVIS
Student borrowers latest to feel credit crunch

February 17, 2008

If you want to borrow a lot of money for college, you are not going to like what the mortgage mess is doing to you.

The credit crunch, which started with a panic over people missing home loan payments several months ago, has spread like a disease, infecting a broad range of loans. Now it may poison opportunities for college students to obtain some loans and is adding painfully high interest costs to many.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080217/news_1b17marks.html

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-02-17 08:01:34

I lost the article and will try to find it, but I recently read that there’s a bit of a battle going on at our institutions of higher learning. The battle pits tenured faculty, which largely espouse liberal arts, and adminstrators, who increasingly favor more “occupational” cirricula.

Having taken both the trade school and college paths - there is a lot to be said for both sides. Still, when it is estimated that only an additional 1% of jobs will require a degree than already require one today, the wisdom of taking on such huge loans seems increasingly flawed - even in the noble pursuit of education.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 08:24:23

The notion that everyone who wants to succeed must go to college seems flawed. The economy needs both higher education and trade schools to meet its staffing requirements.

Comment by flatffplan
2008-02-17 08:31:03

putting a pencil to a LA education would cause me to think the money would be better spent on a trade/business
100k for state or 200k for private = yikes
you could buy your kid a condo (roflow)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-17 12:28:38

I agree GS. Also on-line learning has been improving over the years. I studied C++ and Java on line and learned a lot. You just have to have discipline to complete the courses. There are so many distractions (such as HBB) to cause one to procrastinate.

I like the general education requirements of college, which, properly done, greatly improve a student’s comprehension and analytical skills though. Can’t do that on-line. Also the social aspects of college (dorms, hedonism, etc) are hard to beat.

The best bet is for students to go to cheap junior college for good general ed and to be social, then study on-line for the upper division course work while working part time. Some stuff has to be done at labs though (physics experiments are one example).

It’s ridiculous to get a kid into an expensive private college when a state university math class uses the same text book as a math class at the expensive college. I did not have a dime of student loans.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Dr.Strangelove
2008-02-17 13:48:37

“It’s ridiculous to get a kid into an expensive private college when a state university math class uses the same text book as a math class at the expensive college. I did not have a dime of student loans. ”

Agreed. Unfortunately, trying to tell that to the wanna-be rich Hummer SUV, Coach handbag crowd is another story.

I was discussing the economic advantage of State over private and got hollow arguments from people who feel their kids should go private college (even though they don’t have the cash to send em’ there) just because of the name. Stupid waste of money IMO. These kids will borrow up to their eyeballs and owe a ton of money when they exit private college.

DOC

 
 
 
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2008-02-17 09:11:53

We can not have enough business degrees in America…look what has happened with the “talent” that we have already produced. The US Gov’t should “Nationalize” National University…Maybe India & China have better students, ideas & results. ;-)

 
Comment by are they crazy
2008-02-17 09:17:17

I bemoan that colleges have become high end vocational schools with their only purpose being job driven. I also bemoan pushing every kid towards college. Lastly, I bemoan that the college administrations have taken the attitude that students are customers and should shop colleges like cars for the extras instead of the education.

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-17 12:38:19

News this weekend (after the latest shooting) suggests that “security” is just one more ala carte feature you need to trade in deciding on the education commodity.

My wife is insistent that colleges have to build walls and have armed guards at every door with searches / metal detectors. Well, she is used to that, being from the Philippines. Well, there, colleges are generally one building compounds only a friar could love. Even after showing her the aerial photo of my university and its 100+ major buildings with miles of perimeter I still don’t believe she understands the immensity of her challenge.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by in Colorado
2008-02-17 11:39:17

It will be interesting to see how this pans out. IMO degrees from 2nd tier universities will increasingly be of dubious value. The good jobs will go to the grads of the elite schools, and all the others will end up waiting on tables at chain restaurants.

Comment by Moman
2008-02-17 16:45:27

Degrees from 2nd tier u’s are already pointless. If a place like University of Phoenix can’t get any credit, how about a strip-mall college? In my experience, the only people I’ve talked to that think college is pointless have gone to one of them, where listing the degree on a resume will only provide a good laugh for a hiring manager (except at Chilis, as noted).

 
Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-17 17:50:58

Colorado, I am 48 and earning over $200,000 per year. I graduated from a California State University. I’ve been working in my field of study since 1985. Now you have me convinced that if I graduated from Harvard, I should be making over $400,000 per year instead! LOL

 
 
Comment by Quirk
2008-02-17 16:29:43

Yeah, Florida’s bitching and crying poor, too, on education. College kids may not get their scholarships. Boo hoo. What the hell was that lottery money supposed to do?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-02-17 07:43:38

Experts say future looks like it’s going to be a bear
By Joe Bel Bruno
ASSOCIATED PRESS
February 17, 2008

NEW YORK – Bear markets are a bit like recessions: Investors don’t know they’re in one until it’s almost over. But they can feel the pain.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080217/news_1b17market.html

 
Comment by NotInMontana
2008-02-17 08:29:30

Missoula is different!

“Montana, like some other Rocky Mountain states, has been less affected by the subprime mess than has Michigan, Florida, Nevada and California.

Missoula - as well as Austin, Texas, Salem, Ore., and other cities - never experienced the steep runup in housing prices, and so prices remain fairly firm.

Bruno Friia, owner of Lambros Real Estate, said Friday now is a good time for homebuyers in Missoula County - given the wide selection of inventory, low mortgage rates and attractive home prices.

Friia said Missoula’s market remains strong, cautioning buyers not to get spooked by the doomsday described by national publications.

“In any market, all real estate is local,” he said. “I don’t play the stock market, but I know real estate. This is a good opportunity to buy.” “

Comment by in Colorado
2008-02-17 11:42:30

According to wikipedia:

“The median income for a household in the city was $30,366, and the median income for a family was $42,103.”

I’m willing to bet that the median price is a lot more than 120K. “Attractive home prices”? Pffftt!

Comment by NotInMontana
2008-02-17 16:54:56

Yup, 208K right now. That’s 10% higher than it was last January.

 
 
 
Comment by msprompt
2008-02-17 08:55:39

I’m so pissed. For years, it has been impossible for my old man and me to buy a gd home. So we saved and saved and saved. Now we’re sitting on a small pile of cash and because all those a-holes defrauded the system, rates are getting cut and our savings is losing thousands every year. To make matters worse, now we really can’t buy a house becuase no one knows what the h they’re worth! free market economy MY *SS! I need someone, anyone, to talk me down from the ledge before I go postal. Where in the hell is the MSM? We’re part of the story over here and though I may not be a poor minority who is in danger of getting the boot, I can give good quotes. I can look pathetic. How’s about reporting BOTH SIDES? People who have been royally screwed are a story, too - they’re real victims - but not WORD ONE about us from the MSM. I’m so angry. What’s a girl to do?

Comment by Ben Jones
2008-02-17 09:37:02

Remember what I said the other day about posters and victims? msprompt was a little more explicit, but you can see what I mean.

As far as what to do, how about planning a nice vacation with all the money you are saving by renting? While there, contemplate what it’s like to be a FB with a limited future and choices because of a financial mistake.

IMO, there are no real victims in economic matters. We make our choices. They may turn out to be poor or work out well, but they were choices. Financial manias should be prevented if possible; that’s something that is beginning to be understood, even by the MSM and the powers that be. It’s one of the top priorities for me. I use every chance to promote that concept. But we are also dealt the cards we’ve got, and I can’t see how feeling downtrodden helps.

Here in northern Arizona, many people live without running water. Substance abuse is rampant, economic opportunity is slim. But I don’t hear much complaining about it. That’s one of the things I like about this part of the country.

I hope it’s as beautiful a day where you are as it is here. I hope you and yours are healthy. There are many things more important than owning a house or having a high return on CDs.

Comment by Ben Jones
2008-02-17 10:00:21

BTW, by running water I mean they have to truck it in.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-02-17 10:31:17

A comfortable apartment + a loving wife + food on the table + Jack Daniels = A whole lot of happiness

I thought a lot about your comments about victims last week, Ben. It really made sense. I enjoy my life to feel like a victim in anything. I am trying to spread that and keep people from falling into the victim trap. I am related to many “victims” and their lives are pathetic. It is amazing how people can come from the same background and see the world so differently. Some on this blog might think I’m “pessimistic” but I am probably the most optimistic person around because I let all of my pessimism free.

We are going to have raw oysters in The Village today. I’m happy as heck.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-02-17 11:48:29

Ben:

I’ll bet you a server, that if you talked to Maria, Joe or anyone at CNBC or Fox Business news or their producers, or production people, NONE have this blog on their bookmarks and read it as much as me. I cant imagine the alternative that they would purposely censor the news about the housing bubble.

PS….Fox News has some production assistant openings and i finally got to talk to a human and she said i am overqualified…aka too OLD and knowledgeable.

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-02-17 12:46:09

What is the production assistant’s job but to gently and firmly move the guest offstage if they start to deviate from rosy projections. Throat clearing, watch looking, elbow scratching, mic cutting, etc. Who could detect nascent off-message realism sooner than a knowledgeable oldster? ;) They NEED you!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Vermontergal
2008-02-17 12:46:40

Ben - thanks for this comment. This is a great board and blog but I wonder about all those who get so angry about not being able to buy a house *right now*. No house is worth being an FB or spending so much life energy worrying about.

Money in the bank buys freedom and choices, even if the interest is so-so.

 
 
Comment by RoundSparrow
2008-02-17 09:42:47

Unless you really saved a huge amount ($100K plus), why focus on buying? We are heading into a period of government turmoil and owning a house with cash in it could prove to be a bad choice. Rent! Until it is cheaper to buy than Rent, you are just locking yourself into a house where tax increases, bad neighbors, who knows what else.

But like I said, if you really have a lot of $ saved, you can afford to blow some on a house; just live within your means (not based on what you saved over the past years, but what you will earn in future years).

Comment by aNYCdj
2008-02-17 14:00:14

But should we do a credit check on our “landlord”? Or find a landlord like mine who lived here 45 years? Yes the house is old, need to put towels at the bottom of the doors, plaster walls not well insulated 10 coats of paint on the walls….But REAL wood moldings!!!

Its time someone stood up and said…I don’t care about luxury…i want clean safe and AFFORDABLE!

———————————————–
Rent! Until it is cheaper to buy than Rent

 
Comment by Moman
2008-02-17 16:40:16

I am renting a condo from a FB. I would be pissed if I had bought without living here first because just today kids are skateboarding all around, and it’s common to hear radios blasting and fraternity atmosphere every weekend night. So, be happy that you can rent and don’t get stuck by these neighbors.

Someone has been calling the police a lot because I see them ticketing the lazy people who park in the fire lanes instead of walking another 20 seconds to the parking area. I’m tempted to call them everytime, but someone always beats me to it.

 
 
Comment by Lip
2008-02-17 09:53:42

msp,

You’ve been doing the right thing and the deals are going to be coming in the near future, but not just yet. With a good credit score and money in the bank you’ll be able to make the deal that you want or walk away if they don’t take your deal. You have the power, just wait a little longer, just a couple more years of patience and it’ll be all right.

So climb off that ledge, keep looking for the house you want for the next two years, then when you’re absolutely sure you’ve found the house you want to live in the “for rest of your life”, buy it.

How’s that, are you off the ledge now?

 
Comment by creamofthecrap
2008-02-17 10:24:17

msprompt: I understand your anger, but Ben is right… being in the same situation as you, I have to put my resentment aside about being a good saver, and be thankful that I’m doing better than FB’s, appreciate my health, etc.

That being said, the system has picked winners and losers.

Winners:
-direct REIC participants who have made money hand over fist during the boom (”Realtors”, mortgage brokers, Wall Street folks who made huge bonuses founded on the bubble, builders, others?)
-consumers w/ bad credit who got to live in nice houses for awhile, due to easy credit, and will be no worse off once they are foreclosed on, and just go back to renting
-retail industry pumped up by additional consumer spending from the housing ATM
-generally, borrowers and spenders

Losers:
-people on fixed income (e.g. seniors), as low interest and inflation eat at the value of their savings
-more broadly, all savers for the same reason, unless you have been sufficiently financially sophisticated to ride various investments up during the bubble, and short them on the way down
-homeowners who just bought to have a place to live, not as an investment, due to higher property taxes on inflated home values
-investors in MBS instruments now holding the bag

 
 
Comment by nhz
2008-02-17 09:08:52

LONDON (Reuters) - The UK government will announce the nationalization of the troubled British bank Northern Rock (NRK.L: Quote, Profile, Research) at 1600 GMT (11 a.m. EST), Sky News reported on Sunday.

The government declined to comment.

OK, who’s next in Europe for a bailout? The EU housing market has not even started to deflate and they already resort to solutions like these :(

Comment by Quirk
2008-02-17 16:33:53

Coming soon: The People’s State of England

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-02-17 09:20:27

Where in the hell is the MSM?………Well THEY DON’T HIRE PEOPLE LIKE ME!

Fox News has some production assistant openings and i finally got to talk to a human and she said i am overqualified…aka too OLD and knowledgeable.

 
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-02-17 09:22:21

“Now we’re sitting on a small pile of cash and because all those a-holes defrauded the system, rates are getting cut and our savings is losing thousands every year.”

How do we save? We don’t.
That money we saved is going to pay our monthly bills.
It’s sick.

 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2008-02-17 09:23:45

msprompt -
Love your spunk. We are on the sidelines too, in our post homeowner state, awaiting an entry point again. What about our ‘life on hold’ stories.
You’re absolutely right about the MSM.

 
Comment by Ria Rhodes
2008-02-17 09:31:00

This morning I’m listening to a national radio segment and hear a woman bemoaning her fate because her adjustable mortgage is about to reset up, and her hairdressing business has dropped off. So then I hear candidate Clinton stating it is not about speeches, but about making a difference in the lives of middle class Americans, and I’m thinking, “Who signed-off on that adjustable rate mortgage”? I don’t think I’m a heartless person, but where has personal responsibility in our country wandered off to? Why are so many Americans thinking of themselves as victims? Victims of predatory lenders, victims of being overweight because of the temptation of food, victims of over spending because of credit cards, and so on. Frankly it’s all a bit depressing.

Comment by arroyogrande
2008-02-17 13:23:46

“where has personal responsibility in our country wandered off to”

We’ve lost it. It’s far too difficult and tiring to be responsible for your own life, and to learn from your own actions. You wouldn’t want to make people tired by having to research things that impact their lives, now would you?

To the hairdresser lady and Mrs. Clinton - look, if renting is good enough for me, my wife, and my three kids, it’s good enough for you. Period.

Comment by Quirk
2008-02-17 16:36:21

The Clinton’s rented the White House for eight years.

And then they tried to take some of the stuff with them when they left.

The worst redneck renters of them all.

 
 
 
Comment by Hoz
2008-02-17 10:02:40

US recession odds drop.

See intrade.
http://tinyurl.com/ypvw8q

Surprisingly enough, Intrade appears to be a valid tool. If interested in using it for any data, the correlation is with a 10 - 15 day moving average. It smoothes out the swamp wagers.

Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-17 13:04:07

Continued ARM resets and house price drops will squeeze consumer spending more and more over the next few years. So I don’t think the recession odds are dropping.

 
 
Comment by Chip
2008-02-17 11:16:09

Relative to the economy, at least in regard to “toys”:

This week I met a man who delivers cars to and from the Barrett Jackson auctions. I told him I thought prices would drop in the current economic environment. He said that’s correct and proceeded to tell me about a man who worked for four years making a Dodge Charger (19666 or 67, as I recall) absolutely perfect - what he called a “200 point” car, which must be pretty awesome. The owner even included tiny details like a small dimple in the spoiler that was the result of a slight imperfection in the original factory die for the part. This fellow told me that based on prices in recent years, the car should have gone for maybe $240K. It sold for $100K. That is one heck of a drop. (Numbers as best I recall from the conversation - it was shocking.)

Comment by Moman
2008-02-17 16:36:02

Old cars has been another bubble. The media loves to hype depressed, middle-aged men looking for their old cars that reminds them of picking up chicks in high school back when they thought they would be someone and not a typical office drone.

I love old cars, but the prices of some of those old pieces of junk is ridiculous. I remember being able to get a 1968 Mustang fastback V8 for 5-6K. We sold one for $2000 in ‘95 that would easily be worth $20k today. For 20k, I’ll just buy a new one which is faster, safer, more comfortable - better in every way.

In other news, now that I can affod a camper I don’t want one. Funny how that works…..but I might keep an eye for a super good steal. It seems in FL suburbs a requisite feature (beside the big 4×4 truck or SUV - in Florida, mind you) was a boat or a camper.

Comment by Quirk
2008-02-17 16:38:11

Consider the camper “hurricane housing”. Cheaper than a FEMA trailer, and more handy!

Comment by FB wants a do over
2008-02-17 18:24:37

And don’t forget safer than one of FEMA’s Formaldehyde ridden trailers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2008-02-18 02:44:45

Don’t campers outgas formaldehyde also?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by reuven
2008-02-17 13:02:14

Today’s New York Times has an article about HOMELESS people (aka “bums”) squatting in foreclosed houses

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Homeless-Foreclosure.html?ex=1203915600&en=60a61377a96a7376&ei=5070&emc=eta1

(Registration-free link)

 
Comment by arroyogrande
2008-02-17 13:19:07

“New Clinton economic message has echoes of Edwards”
Reuters

“After taking a question from a little girl who told her that she and her mother were about to lose their home because the mortgage payment had jumped too high, Clinton invited the two onstage and put her arm around them.

Clinton said the woman, a hairdresser whose mortgage payment jumped from $600 to $1,000 a month, was in a similar position to many people she had spoken to who been pushed into adjustable-rate loans by unscrupulous mortgage brokers. ”

Pushed into adjustable-rate loans…pushed…PUSHED.

Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-17 13:53:01

Hitlary recently was talking about the mortgage crisis. She blamed bankers and never even mentioned there were individual speculators who may have lied about their incomes. She is a witch! Does she expect that her listeners think there were no individuals who lied about their incomes? Whatever happened to contract law? If one claims he did not understand his contract, that’s his own frigging fault - hire a contract lawyer to understand that contract for you. No excuse, commie political power-hungry Hillary!

 
Comment by reuven
2008-02-17 14:03:00

I don’t care if she gives them a hug and a juice box. I just don’t want her to give them (my) money! Either directly, or indirectly by lowering interest rates and devaluing our dollar.

Comment by ACH
2008-02-17 21:23:49

I completely agree with the money part. Washington will attempt to have the taxpayer holding the bag on this. Hillary will do this, Obama will do this, McCain will do this. My main problem is that I don’t have anyone to vote for. I agree with no one. No, I’m not a Ron Paul follower. I like his housing and credit bubble views, it’s his other views that I disagree with.
Roidy

Comment by bill in Maryland
2008-02-18 17:58:20

The choices are clear: Either big government or small government. Or do you want a candidate that suits your particular desire to have free haircuts for the rest of your life? I’m saying, what’s to quibble about?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by msprompt
2008-02-17 14:24:56

Yes the day is lovely, Ben, and and I have my health and I promise I’m not a gross materialist (if I were, I’d have bought a house I couldn’t afford.) And, yes, Lip, I will continute to hang on, thanks for hte encouragement. And creamOfTheCrap, thanks for your advice. But, all, my anger goes beyond the immediate question of to own or not to own; it’s about being cheated by the very system and overlords put there to protect us. it’s about fraud, plain and simple. it’s about the rule of law. How are we supposed to maintain a civil society when only some contracts are binding and you can’t know which ones they are. It is outrageous, I tell you. And I can’t believe that more people are not up in arms at the dismantling of the supposed free market system. I am giving a two-fingered salute to all in the fourth estate. Public interest my *SS.

Comment by CA renter
2008-02-18 05:50:05

Agree with you, msprompt.

We are very happy with our family and “more important stuff” but that doesn’t mean we should be happy that the govt is debasing the currency and forcing us to lose purchasing power every year (yes, I know about gold & foreign currencies, but this goes beyond that).

I don’t consider myself a victim. Just mad as heck.

 
 
Comment by Moman
2008-02-17 15:37:17

My company hosted day-long training classes yesterday at a hotel. In the next room was one of those ‘get-rick-quick’ scam seminars where people were lectured all day on how to buy foreclosed houses and flip for money. I estimate there were about 150 people in the room. Most of them looked like typical J6P, fat assed dumbasses who can’t think for themselves. I took a brief second to talk to the speaker, he was selling a tape cassette and DVD set for $399 as a supplement to the training. He told me they are from CA and have made millions on this stuff; I just got a blank stare when I asked “from flipping foreclosures or selling seminar tapes?” The real scary thing was the number of sheeple (I mean people) lined up with credit cards in hand to buy the $399 pacakge. Not debit cards; credit cards.

And we would have thought people learned from the stock market and now housing bubble…..

Comment by Quirk
2008-02-17 16:44:24

When you have nothing left to lose you have nothing left to lose.

Comment by FB wants a do over
2008-02-17 18:41:52

Quirk, I’m not picking on you, however, your comment reminded of something someone once said. Wonder if anyone will be able to guess who said this.

“Tribal sovereignty means that; it’s sovereign. I mean, you’re a — you’ve been given sovereignty, and you’re viewed as a sovereign entity. And therefore the relationship between the federal government and tribes is one between sovereign entities.” —Washington, D.C., Aug. 6, 2004

http://youtube.com/watch?v=B5xVRXLgLxw

Comment by measton
2008-02-17 20:49:39

I guessed it correctly. It makes you laugh for a minute until you realize that the guy has been supposedly running our country for 7 years.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post