March 24, 2008

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For March 24, 2008

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

338 Comments »

Comment by bizarroworld
2008-03-24 04:15:37

JPMorgan to raise offer for Bear Stearns: report
http://tinyurl.com/yvafca

“The Fed, which must approve any new deal, was balking at the new offer price on Sunday night after several days of frantic, secret negotiations,” the newspaper reported, citing people involved in the negotiations.

Comment by mgnyc99
2008-03-24 04:38:04

nice gain if you bought under $5 i bet the offer goes higher
trading over 9 in the pm

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-03-24 05:01:26

I would just stay away from that one, altogether. There is money to be made but at what risk?

Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 05:17:27

I had that POS at 3.25. 40K shares. I did okay but we’re talking 280K in profit.

Now that pisses me off.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-03-24 05:20:47

So, do you agree with the Barron’s jenius that is predicting Dow 18,000 - 20,000 this year? That is what the CNBC shills are spewing this morning. Is that the big rally of which you speak?

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 05:22:30

No. My guess is we’ll rally back (haven’t looked at the fibonacci retracements yet) maybe 70% of the move down from the top over the next few months and then tank again. Figuring I’ll start put buying again in late June or July.

 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-03-24 05:25:14

BSC = $10.05 in pre-market.

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 05:36:01

I’d short it there if anything but just staying away. I made $24/share on the downside and some on the upside so I guess I should just shut up and be happy.

 
Comment by JP
2008-03-24 05:51:49

I agree with shorting it (if anything). The full nyt article is quite interesting:

The Fed, which must approve any new deal, was balking at the new offer price on Sunday night after several days of frantic, secret negotiations, these people said. As a result, it was still possible the renegotiated deal might be postponed or collapse entirely, said these people

The NYT article is here.

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 06:03:29

Like I said last week, there will be rumor driven price spikes, such as this one. On things like this, I only mess with them when there’s a clear edge like last Monday. Come on, $2??? For Bear Stearns? I’ll take a shot at that.

In March of ‘03, American Airlines traded down to $1.50 on bankruptcy rumors. I bought that too. Give me a break - American Airlines?

Any of you all who are actively trading these markets, I can’t recommend the Minyanville intraday product (Buzz and Banter) any more highly. I have been on that since it started at the bottom of the bear market in ‘02. Todd is one of the best traders ever and I have learned so much from him that I find now that I do the same things he does at almost exactly the same time. My other mentor, Jeff Cooper, is also on there. They charge $59 a month for this. It’s a raging bargain.

 
Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 06:27:34

I am short BSC, Long BSC preferred and long JPM. I am going to take a hit on the opening. I will be shorting more BSC if I can get the stock from a non callable source since the numbers still work. That is the only way to play this market of rumors.

Fortunately I hope to sell the financials that I am default long (by not being short) this morning. I can sleep with the ear position, I could not sleep with long Citigroup et al.

 
Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 07:07:56

Urban Dictionary
1. bear stearned
To crash, to collapse, to plummet, to fail

1. I can’t believe it, I completely bear stearned that test.

2. For the third time this week, my computer bear stearned on me.

2. bear stearned

The rapid loss of confidence in one’s capabilities from one’s traditionally supportive network of friends, customers, etc.

Ralph: Dude, nobody wants me to fix their computers anymore.

Ted: You’ve been bear stearned, bro.

3. Bear Stearned
Buying an item and then realizing a week later it is worth 3.33% of what you paid for it.

Dude, you know that car I bought last Monday for $6,000? I had to take it Sunday for $5,800 in repairs. I totally got Bear Stearned by that sales guy.

4. bear stearned

To make a large bet with collateral and lose and then have your bookie sell your collateral for pennies on the dollar to your neighbor.

That dude was whacked at vegas and got bear stearned.
I guess uncle Louie was wrong about the trifecta as he just got bear stearned
Bernacke and J Diamond let the house of cards fall at Bear Stearns

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 07:21:01

“Figuring I’ll start put buying again in late June or July.”

Every breath you take
And every move you make
Every bond you break, every step you take
I’ll be watching you

–Sting–

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 07:23:16

As a result, it was still possible the renegotiated deal might be postponed or collapse entirely, said these people

Er… isn’t BSC quintessentially a too-big-to-fail company? That’s the very reason for all the frantic negotiating behind closed doors.

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 07:24:34

I think my track record going back 3 years now is pretty good.

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 07:45:28

OMG. I just looked. Over 300K in profit possible. Now I’m going to be sick.

 
Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 08:09:59

Said Ms. Txchick blingingly, “I think I need a new platinum tiara.”

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 08:25:12

made 93K and I’m unhappy with it. There’s something wrong there.

 
Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 08:50:41

Now, Ms Tx think how horrible you would feel if you had lost moneys.

 
Comment by Blano
2008-03-24 08:53:38

I’m watching the BSC trading this morning…….talk about being in high gear.

 
Comment by DavidCee
2008-03-24 09:06:03

“I’m watching the BSC trading this morning…….talk about being in high gear.”

To all the day traders on this reasl estate blog, I would highly recommend “Gambler’s Annonymous” for your next
training session. I would like to get back to discussing real estate, but I seem to have to wade thru tons of hype of daily stock market strategy. Maybe Ben can start another blog for those who need to play the market daily. That’s not investing, that’s gambling

 
Comment by Blano
2008-03-24 10:02:03

The overwhelming majority of threads here are RE related…..deal with it.

 
Comment by dude
2008-03-24 10:12:18

Tx, you can’t cry over unrealized gains. I have to tell myself that just about every week. Money left on the table vs. money in your pocket? I’ll take the money in my pocket.

Speaking of unrealized gains, I got stopped out of my MER 30 puts this morning finally for only about 1/3 the gain I could have made while I was incommunicado in the hinterlands of Catalonia. I’m not going to cry over 300% gain for 11K.

I’m going back in little long on BSC Oct 7.5 puts if I get my price.

 
Comment by barbarus
2008-03-24 10:20:03

I’m here for the economics. I find Hoz & the chick particularly informative & thank them for the invaluable education the provide.

 
Comment by Blano
2008-03-24 10:21:33

Exactly. Also appreciate the discussions about Treasuries, currencies, and the like.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 11:01:47

David Cee is just bitter over all the HC bashing…

 
Comment by DavidCee
2008-03-24 11:08:37

“I’m here for the economics. I find Hoz & the chick particularly informative & thank them for the invaluable education the provide.”

OK, so set up a website for day trading and speuclation of options, and see how many people show up. This is a real estate thread, it was started as a real estate thread, it grew as a real estate thread. I enjoy and learn a lot on economics, currencies and treasuries. And don’t enjoy being overrun with day trading hype. When does it turn into promoting dollar stocks? Day trading should not be the focus of this Blog, and I find myself going elsewhere to find real estate info.
What a shame to have such a wonderful blog be destroyed by day trading addicts.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 12:28:21

Back OT…

ELECTION NOTEBOOK
Clinton touts housing plan in Pennsylvania
By Robert Schroeder, MarketWatch
Last update: 2:08 p.m. EDT March 24, 2008

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Hillary Clinton headed back to the campaign trail Monday with a stop in Philadelphia to tout her four-part plan to fix the U.S. housing crisis.

Last week, Clinton released plans for a $30 billion emergency housing fund that would go to states and localities to help head off foreclosures.

 
Comment by JimAtLaw
2008-03-24 15:27:44

So classic… $30B is such a drop in the bucket, why does anyone bother?

8 figures of homes mortgaged at 6 figures over valuation = not less than 1 trillion negative equity, and likely a significant multiple of this.

If the carnage is as bad as many say it will eventually be, this won’t even be a whole 1%! Of course, this will not be reported in the MSM anywhere… rant rant…

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 17:30:27

“So classic… $30B is such a drop in the bucket, why does anyone bother?”

Agreed. I just roughed out a back-o-the-envelope estimate of $1t in YOY home equity losses for CA SFRs, alone. I don’t suspect the picture would improve if you through condos into the mix, not to mention the rest of the U.S.

 
 
 
 
Comment by FP
2008-03-24 09:48:52

This really gives you an idea on how Wall Street is playing with the Fed. They got the Feds buy the “balls”.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 11:00:49

That is why a little more regulation may do a lot of good: Get the Street off the gubmint’s back.

 
Comment by Seattle Renter
2008-03-24 14:52:18

Interesting freudian typo. More like “they got the Fed to buy the sweaty ball sack that is Bear Sterns.”

 
 
 
Comment by Tokyo Renter - ex LA Renter
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-03-24 04:47:53

Some New Yorkers said their neighbors seemed to be in denial.

“I was at a benefit last week, and a major well-known chief executive told me that ‘Everything will be just fine. People will start buying houses again,’ ” said David Patrick Columbia, who runs the New York Social Diary, a Web site that chronicles Manhattan social life. “Another one blamed everything on the media. He went on about how the media is creating a recession.”

yes the denial is thick here in nyc but not everyone is so delusional

well yesterday i was talking with my cousin who is in finance and was looking for a place to purchase in the 1.8-2m range (he can afford it) and he is not pulling the trigger and will stay renting

another person who was at the gathering works in private equity and m&a at citi and he was telling me they are fine although he did say that no deals are getting done at all (none)

that alot of guys have nothing to do as all the liquidity has dried up. how long will they stay doing nothing getting paid alot of $$?

i just kind of let a few things out and he did get defensive

i told him i would send him an email with a link to this blog

he has been at citi for 9 years and is a major player there as he sits with the ceo quite regularly

 
Comment by IllinoisBob
2008-03-24 05:11:35

Denial? We will fix that :-)

Wall Street Firms Cut 34,000 Jobs, Most Since 2001 Dot-Com Bust

Wall Street banks hit by mortgage losses and writedowns have cut more than 34,000 jobs in the past nine months, the most since the dot-com boom fizzled in 2001.

Citigroup Inc., Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Morgan Stanley are among the firms that have disclosed headcount reductions so far. After the Internet bubble burst, 39,800 jobs were eliminated during the same period; the number climbed to 90,000 in the next two years, according to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aTARUhP3w5xE&refer=home

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 07:42:33

Well, it is obvious that a few thousand job losses will have no impact on NYC housing prices. This is because it is different there in NYC.

Comment by EndOfEmpire
2008-03-24 10:28:55

A few thousand jobs lost is a drop in the bucket in a city of 8 million.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 10:56:06

I think the location of the jobs may have something to do with how big a drop we are talking about (e.g. a Wall Street job loss is not equivalent to a street cleaner job lost…)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 10:58:14

One more point: You are forgetting to account for multiplier effects, as in one Wall Street job lost implies a marginal effect of X jobs lost in the remainder of the U.S. macroeconomy, where X is greater than 1.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by taxmeupthebooty
2008-03-24 04:25:44

anything selling in your hood?
I see some activity ,but it obscured by so many relisttings, failed listings, foreclosures etc , it’s hard to tell
22151

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-03-24 04:57:49

I just saw a new listing in my hometown. It is obviously bank owned. The price is just insane. It is listed at $156,000 but my as well be $10,000,000. It should be selling for $90,000 at best, based upon condition. And then at the end of the listing I see, “priced to sell”. It is amazing that people think if they type it then it must be true.

It is another season of wishes and denial in the Land of 10,000 Lakes.

 
Comment by oxide
2008-03-24 05:18:10

A couple weeks ago I picked up the little Real Estate book for hoity-toity Vail Valley CO. Several of the pictures had a little banner over the corner which said “Price Improved!” I found that pretty funny.

btw I have no idea how to price these properties (it appears to depend a LOT on location).

 
Comment by Blano
2008-03-24 05:19:40

I’m just seeing some new realtor signs to go along with all the ones that have sat there all winter.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2008-03-24 10:33:26

Spring flowers have come to Tucson. Along with many new “For Sale” signs.

 
 
Comment by saywhat?
2008-03-24 05:31:04

In NW Bexar County (San Antonio area), there are 30 houses in a 4 street area where my home is located. Eleven are for sale and nothing is moving. Many on the market for over a year. About 1/2 resales, 1/2 new. And yet, another is being built down the street from me. Price range is from $206K to $425K. I don’t get it…yet I get it. I wish I could wipe this perpetually puzzled look off my face, though.

Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 05:37:49

I’d love to see the San Antonio local who can afford $400K for a house. You could probably fit them all comfortably into the restroom of the nearest Exxon station.

Comment by mgnyc99
2008-03-24 05:45:09

lol- i saw an old flip that house this weekend from San Antonio. it was a succeess it was also from 9/06

i wonder what the douchebags are up to now? probably filling your car up at the exxon

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-03-24 06:00:36

Armando might be the biggest piece of $hit I have ever seen. He makes the Wall Street guys look honorable.

 
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-03-24 06:05:20

you saw it too huh.

what a douche bag !
but the girl in the half shirt and shorts raking the mulch was a nice touch

 
Comment by desertdweller
2008-03-24 08:13:53

His wife. How or why she puts up with him…what a jrk.

 
Comment by patient renter
2008-03-24 13:38:14

I can’t believe I wasn’t the only one who saw this. The guy even drives a hummer!

 
Comment by wittbelle
2008-03-24 17:36:48

Armando is selling a book called “Get Rich Flipping” or something along those lines, and promoting a house flipping seminar in conjunction with same. I was gonna go to the one here locally, but I worried about my skin drying out. (I couldn’t possibly shower long enough to get the slime off).

 
 
Comment by saywhat?
2008-03-24 05:46:02

No joke. It’s the guy next door who wants $425K. This is the 4th time he’s put it up for sale - last fall, he wanted $495K. He built and moved in July 2005. Can’t get info on what he borrowed with the county records - he’s obscured it somehow - but from former conversations, it was about $230K if he is to be believed.
BTW, he’s a property tax cheat and BCAD was very glad to find that out. Oh, and he’s a “public servant” with the city of SA.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 05:56:37

There’s a scuzzbag here who has been paying an assessment of 220K while listing his lake view house as a teardown for 899K. I hounded the Dallas County Appraisal District until they went and reassessed the property. At the millage rates they pay around here, that’s an outrage.

 
 
Comment by Skip
2008-03-24 09:34:56

I’d love to see the San Antonio local who can afford $400K for a house.

Visit Alamo Heights some time, they even have several gas stations.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ghostwriter
2008-03-24 05:48:40

I agree with you that it’s hard to tell. Properties are listed, relisted w/someone else, relisted again as a short sale, unlisted, then relisted as a foreclosure. It’s hard to get a grip on numbers.

Comment by saywhat?
2008-03-24 05:56:20

I’ve just been trying to find the dang deed of trust. I seriously doubt he paid cash…he rented in a rather low end of town before. He’s not a saver. He did get a $75,000 line of credit in August 2005. All very curious to me.

 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-03-24 10:59:04


In the sparsely populated neighborhood I heard of news of a rental that fell thru today and yesterday I heard of a purchase that fell thru few days ago just before the close of escrow. The seller had already bought a house to move into.

Lot of people changing minds at the last minutes, it seems.

Jas

 
 
Comment by Lip
2008-03-24 04:43:50

Great Cartoon!
http://caglecartoons.com/viewimage.asp?ID={49FB7182-602B-461A-B66F-12CC7C885D02}

 
Comment by Front Range Bob
2008-03-24 04:49:42

Are You Afraid To Look Poor?
By MP Dunleavey — MSN Money.

Wanting to appear rich and being afraid to look poor may sound like the same thing, but they’re not.

One is racing to keep ahead of the Joneses, the other desperately trying to keep up. One is rooted in pride, the other in fear.

And though neither behavior is particularly smart, the fear of seeming broke is its own special torment, fraught with shame, anxiety and intricate acts of financial self-deception.

http://preview.tinyurl.com/2s6r2e

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-03-24 05:06:10

Visiting the tinyurl website always makes me feel poor.

 
Comment by exeter
2008-03-24 05:11:30

Well who is smarter. A guy who chooses to live in a doublewide banking $1000 a week and earning 5% interest and zero debt with mobility or the 60kMcMillionare anchored to the banks house and wage servitude who needs affirmation of his pseudo prestige and pays the bank $1000/week ($500 or better in interest)? Our culture is warped and twisted.

Comment by barbarus
2008-03-24 10:47:13

“and earning 5% interest”

Where????????

Comment by exeter
2008-03-24 12:04:28

5 year cd’s were paying 5% as of 6 months ago. And they’re good for uhhhhhhh…. 5 years.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2008-03-24 13:06:08

You’re wrong. At this point those CD’s are good for 4 1/2 years.

 
Comment by exeter
2008-03-24 17:08:36

Hmmm… I laddered 50k in a 5 year CD last fall at 5%. How does that work for me but not for you?

 
 
 
 
Comment by tab
2008-03-24 05:21:26

No

Comment by 45north
2008-03-24 06:50:40

tab: seems kind of negative

Comment by tab
2008-03-24 07:45:37

The passenger side window on my ford focus is duct taped on. I think it gives the car character.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by desertdweller
2008-03-24 08:17:57

My 76 VW Rabbit was sort of white ish with one brown door and the hood was bungeed down and no radio in sight-just wires pulled out.
Never had to lock my car in NYC. Great car. Parked in every tiny spot.

 
Comment by Tulkinghorn
2008-03-24 08:40:59

Let me guess - during the garbage strike, were you one of the guys who gift-wrapped his garbage and left it on the seat of his car?

 
Comment by desertdweller
2008-03-24 09:58:27

No, but that is funny!

Inherited the Wabbit, and it served me very well in NYC.

That trash strike was something else, so were the Blackouts.

 
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2008-03-24 05:31:28

Hm. This article doesn’t seem to fit denial, anger, bargaining, depression, or acceptance.

Maybe it’s one of the twelve steps?…
…Hm, I just wikipedia’d the 12 steps. The closest match is Step ~1.5. We have a long way to go.

 
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-03-24 05:48:45

i have no problem “looking poor”

i drive an old car completewly paid for and have zero debt and the mobility factor in these times is priceless

who gives a crap about “luxury items”?

does luxury even mean anything anymore?

by “looking poor” no one will come to you for money

Comment by exeter
2008-03-24 06:20:27

I have no problem appearing poor so long as my bank account reflects a growing pile of $$$.

Life is strange. A typical McMillionare would look at the contractors group of guys on a construction site and make disparaging remarks based on their appearance yet I know more millionares in the construction biz than in the engineers office and I work in both locations.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-03-24 06:29:48

The funny thing is…

You will not want to look prosperous, in the near future.

When the public figures out they’ve been sold down the river and have next to nothing in wealth, there will be a backlash of immense proportions against “luxury items” of all stripes.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-03-24 07:22:03

Does that include a$$holes in Cadillac Escalades with spinner wheels?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by desertdweller
2008-03-24 08:25:55

Heads up on when to check out new autos.
Holiday like yesterday. Not a seller in sight. Closed.
So, just for the heck of it, looked at all the Bmws,Lexusss etc.
Question? Is the New thing to put Flashy Chrome Wheels
on every single car? Is that the thing that will see you?

Quite a few models make you look like a flashy drugdealerpimp.
Happy with my 95.

 
Comment by neuromance
2008-03-24 10:18:31

I see an Escalade with spinners, and I think trash with barely pennies to rub together.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2008-03-24 10:38:49

Was at the grocery store on Friday evening. The cashier at the self-checkout was admiring some fancy rims and tires catalog while he was processing my purchase payment. He should have been paying closer attention, because the receipt printer really mangled my receipt.

Once we settled up, I put my purchases into my backpack and walked home. No rims needed here!

 
 
 
Comment by caveat_emptor
2008-03-24 08:10:26

> does luxury even mean anything anymore?

For the most part, I think it just means over-priced. Whenever I see “luxury”, or “custom” attached to the description of an item for sale, I look at it very suspiciously.

My other favorite is “executive” as an adjective. For the most part, it’s a euphemism for crappy and useless. Put “Executive” in front of anything, and imagine it being sold a Brookstone… executive dart board, executive pen&pencil/digital-photo-frame/nature-sound desk set, executive tool kit, you get the idea.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-03-24 08:33:54

When most if not all “luxury items” are made in China, what sort of exclusivity is there to owning a set of Louis Vuitton luggage, really?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by exeter
2008-03-24 09:23:41

Right on Caveat. Add to that the reckless mis-use of the the word “professional”. I believe that unless you work for a P.C. or are bonded, you’re not considered “professional” in NY.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by az_lender
2008-03-24 11:25:24

“by ‘looking poor’ noone will come to you for money”

Hmm. They come to me for money, and then they ask me why I drive a Ford Focus. If I drove something else, I might have to have a straight job other than trailer-park loan-shark.

Comment by tresho
2008-03-24 13:08:42

“by ‘looking poor’ noone will come to you for money” - I guess az_lender is the exception to the rule.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 07:34:12

Now, if you’re blue
And you don’t know where to go to
Why don’t you go where fashion sits
Puttin’ on the ritz
Different types who wear a daycoat
Pants with stripes and cutaway coat
Perfect fits
Puttin’ on the ritz

–Irving Berlin–

Comment by desertdweller
2008-03-24 12:18:18

Young Frankenstein

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 12:30:36

The song actually dates to 1929…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ex-nnvmtgbrkr
2008-03-24 15:45:33

……but begins and ends with Young Frankenstein.

 
Comment by MrBubble
2008-03-24 19:16:51

I play this one on the uke. And sing.

“Tip your hat just like an English chappie
To the lady with the wealthy pappy…
Very snappy.”

Yes, I do the lines like Peter Boyle. And yes, I never get laid. Also I am exceedingly long SRS at 100 and am very drunk. Two tears in a bucket…. Full disclosure is cathartic?

MrBubble

 
 
 
 
Comment by eastcoaster
2008-03-24 09:56:38

Does wearing cheap clothes make you queasy? … You would swear that everyone can smell it when you spend $9.99 on a shirt.

I like to brag about getting a bargain on clothing.

Are you embarrassed to use coupons? … It screams cheapskate.

Are you kidding me?

Do you feel judged by your décor?

Simple solution - get new friends if the ones you have judge you by your furniture.

Did you buy your house, car, stereo or personal digital assistant to impress friends or family?

Try this fun experiment - get a mind of your own. Really, it’s kind of nice to think for yourself.

Picking up a check I couldn’t really afford.

Ooooh…take me to dinner! Please!!!

Taking a trip because I didn’t want others to think I couldn’t afford to do so.

Wow. Some people’s kids.

Comment by barbarus
2008-03-24 10:51:42

“Does wearing cheap clothes make you queasy? … You would swear that everyone can smell it when you spend $9.99 on a shirt.”

9.99 is a CHEAP shirt?

Comment by desertdweller
2008-03-24 12:19:46

Clark Howard the consumer advocate brags that he embarrases his wife with his $5. shirts and socks, while he is saving and making money up the wazoo!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by technovelist
2008-03-24 15:09:22

Wanting to appear rich and being afraid to look poor may sound like the same thing, but they’re not.

One is racing to keep ahead of the Joneses, the other desperately trying to keep up. One is rooted in pride, the other in fear.

No, both are rooted in stupidity.

 
 
Comment by Front Range Bob
2008-03-24 04:57:05

Why We Borrow Until It Hurts
By Michael S. Rosenwald
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, March 23, 2008; Page F01

If the subprime mortgage mess has taught us anything, it is that we are leverage addicts. Nearly all of us are — from Northern Virginia, where we bought big houses with no money down, to Wall Street, where traders borrowed cash to make bigger bets on the housing market.

Seeing Zero Percent Interest Until Next Year! on envelopes causes us to tear them open, find the Web address, enter some information and send new credit cards hurtling toward our mailboxes. Financing cars for three years is so passe; we finance them for six or seven. And now we buy — or used to buy — houses with pick-your-payment mortgages. We are leveraged from here to China. U.S. consumers spend more than 14 percent of their after-tax income just to stay current on household debt.

The question worth asking now is: Why do we love leverage so much that it hurts?

http://preview.tinyurl.com/2l3wz3

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-03-24 05:15:07

I have a friend back home that doesn’t have a pot to urinate in but he told me last week he bought a used Lexus for $24,000 and financed it for 72 months. I almost ripped his throat out through the telephone wires. But it’s okay, he said, “it’s certified”. The car isn’t the only thing that was certifiable.

Comment by mgnyc99
2008-03-24 05:55:00

72 months for a used lexus? lol

he is the mack daddy! and obviously afraId to look poor
at least he can pick up the babes in his “luxury” auto
72 months? a great investment no doubt

 
 
Comment by arlingtonva
2008-03-24 05:21:26

We? There is no we.
There’s one group: FB’s, F’d bankers and F’d investors;
and the other group: people who used sound judgment and chose not to take part in this mess.

Comment by combotechie
2008-03-24 05:38:32

And one group is going to buy, at very cheap prices, the assets of the other.

 
 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2008-03-24 07:05:43

notice that instead of “me,me,me” it’s now “we,we,we” - another form of abdication of responsibility

 
Comment by Wanderer
2008-03-24 18:36:38

We leverage cuz we hate our kids and grandchilden and want them to suffer at our doing!

 
 
Comment by ozajh
Comment by Lou Minatti
2008-03-24 05:20:47

“The (association of used house sellers) Chief Economist Lawrence Yun has been named among the top 10 economic forecasters by USA Today. Yun is ranked fifth on the list and is responsible for NAR’s real estate statistics and economic forecasting. The annual list recognizes accuracy in forecasting.”

ROFL!

Comment by mgnyc99
2008-03-24 05:57:45

usa today is not fit to pick up my dog’s poop

funyuns an economiss

thanks for the laugh on a monday

economists must be so proud today

 
Comment by Tom
2008-03-24 06:05:04

The NAR listed USA Today as one of it’s top 10 newspapers.

 
Comment by exeter
2008-03-24 06:17:13

(fun)Yuns for breakfast, (fun)Yuns for lunch, the dopes at NAR are a criminal bunch.

 
 
 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-03-24 05:13:39

http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/2008-03-22-livingwithparents_N.htm

After being laid off from her job as an events planner at an upscale resort, Jo Ann Bauer struggled financially. She worked at several lower-paying jobs, relocated to a new city and even declared bankruptcy.

Then in December, she finally accepted her parents’ invitation to move into their home — at age 52. “I’m back living in the bedroom that I grew up in,” she said.

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-03-24 06:13:09

Jo Ann Bauer is ranked number 4 on the list of of the top 10 economic forecasters, recognizing accuracy in foreshadowing.

Comment by Earl The Vagabond
2008-03-24 17:01:25

Miss Cleo was ranked #3…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Cleo

 
 
 
Comment by exeter
2008-03-24 05:13:49

Century21 ad on WBBR bloomberg this morning citing April is OpenHouse month. Made me want to puke.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-03-24 05:34:06

NAR is running a ton of commercials during the NCAA basketball tournament. Their hook is that, “family conditions often outweigh market conditions”. That means you should cave into that insufferable husband or wife and eat a 30% drop in your home price. It’s always a great time to buy a realtor a pair of fake t*ts.

Comment by holytrainwreck
2008-03-24 16:16:32

Fake boobs. Priceless. It’s all about the SHOW and not the substance.

 
 
 
Comment by Lee
2008-03-24 05:14:44

‘Pay day’ loans exacerbate U.S. housing crisis
CLEVELAND, March 24 (Reuters) - As hundreds of thousands of American home owners fall behind on their mortgage payments, more people are turning to short-term loans with sky-high interest rates just to get by.
While hard figures are hard to come by, evidence from nonprofit credit and mortgage counsellors suggests that the number of people using these so-called “pay day loans” is growing as the U.S. housing crisis deepens, a negative sign for economic recovery.
“We’re hearing from around the country that many folks are buried deep in pay day loan debts as well as struggling with their mortgage payments,” said Uriah King, a policy associate at the Center for Responsible Lending (CRL).
A pay day loan is typically for a few hundred dollars, with a term of two weeks, and an interest rate as high as 800 percent. The average borrower ends up paying back $793 for a $325 loan, according to the Center.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/feedarticle?id=7406994

Comment by mgnyc99
2008-03-24 06:03:31

payday loans are a surefire way to destroy you financial life

they are used by the most desperate people

$325 loan @ 800% sign me up

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-03-24 06:41:28

“A national 36 percent cap on pay day loans to members of the military came into effect last October. The cap was proposed by Republican Senator Jim Talent and Democratic Senator Bill Nelson — citing APR of up to 800 percent as harmful to the battle readiness and morale of the U.S. Armed Forces.”

Apparently members of our armed forces were amongst the best customers, at payday loan places…

Many g.i.’s couldn’t go to the middle east, as a result of their indebtedness.

Morale & readiness doesn’t mean very much though, if you aren’t in the military, so 800% is still ok, in many states.

Comment by holytrainwreck
2008-03-24 16:19:58

They should have worked for Blackwater, those guys were pulling down 5 Gs plus a DAY.

 
 
Comment by jbunniii
2008-03-24 07:18:36

Why are UK stories about the housing bust always by-lined in Cleveland? This gives them a severely distorted picture of what is happening nationwide. As far as I can tell, Cleveland has never in my life had a healthy economy, so of course their busts are going to be ugly. I find it very hard to believe that payday loans have been resorted to on a broad scale in the US. Yet.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-03-24 07:29:36

Cleveland, Buffalo, Gary & Detroit are very much the future of our country, as they were our first disposable cities…

We set a precedence with the rust belt, of just walking away from our problems and not fixing them.

It doesn’t bode well for the rest of the country…

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 08:03:41

AS mentioned before, the Brits love American problems and in their typical tabloid fashion, go for the worst they can find and try to paint that as typical.

Comment by DallasGallus
2008-03-24 10:19:36

Yeah, I caught some BBC news the other night, and they were highlighting a tent city in LA (somewhere near the Ontario airport, I think?). It was all very third world and thoroughly depressing. One man showed the crew his former home–now foreclosed–that was close to the tent city. The presenter tsk-tsked sadly and shook his head at the sad state of American affairs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2008-03-24 10:47:57

Bush Leagues are popping up all over, with great in tent city.

 
 
 
Comment by Carlos Cisco
2008-03-24 13:42:48

The blue haired ladies in KMart, Wal Mart and Michaels keep the economy going by buying up all the chachkies that CA ships in from China. Truckers strike on April 1 just might break the chain.

 
 
Comment by Wickedheart
2008-03-24 09:10:46

That sh*t is disgusting. Nothing but legalized loan sharking.

Comment by exeter
2008-03-24 09:36:25

They’re supporting the troops. Whats the problem? /sarcasm off

 
 
 
Comment by Remain calm. All's well
2008-03-24 05:23:35

Fed May Buy Mortgages Next, Treasury Investors Bet


Forget lower interest rates. For the Federal Reserve to keep the financial markets from imploding it needs to buy troubled mortgage bonds from banks and securities firms, say the world’s biggest Treasury investors.

Comment by tl
2008-03-24 05:34:29

Wouldn’t that be the re-inflater that we dread?

Comment by tl
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-03-24 05:54:18

It looks like they are using the FHLB as the proxy right now. The story is that FHLB will buy up $100 billion of mortgage backed bonds. That has the market futures rising this morning.

Existing home sales come out at 10.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by auger-inn
2008-03-24 06:19:47

I think I just heard on CNBC that they are forming a committee to study the Housing bust. You won’t even believe who they said will head this panel? Greenspan and Rubin!
Bwahahahaha! You have to be fu*king kidding me? Is this a great country or what!!!!!
This is the best laugh I’ve had for a week!

 
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-03-24 06:33:17

they can really get to the bottom of this whole housing thing. too bad it is not just a housing thing

the whole financial system is under stress and who better to talk about it than greenie

 
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-03-24 08:02:49

HIre Spitzer! He’s a shark.

 
Comment by ozajh
2008-03-24 08:19:21

Auger,

Greenspan and Rubin!

When I initially scanned your post my eyes interpreted that as “Greenspan and Rubini” (sic).

Fortunately I reread before my brain exploded. :D

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 08:32:43

“The story is that FHLB will buy up $100 billion of mortgage backed bonds.”

Is this the same FHLB that kept CFC on life support since last August? What is their connection to the FED? (I am getting tired of eating so much alphabet soup…)

 
Comment by David
2008-03-24 09:20:48

Is that like the blue ribbon comittee setup to study what to do about Iraq in 2006. Bush said he wasnt going to make any decisions until the comittee made their report. The report was pretty clear that we should withdraw. After the report Bush didnt follow any of it.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 07:37:36

Is the denial plausible?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Captain Credit Crunch
2008-03-24 06:31:13

They can’t buy them all. The FED doesn’t have an infinite balance sheet. Indeed, it’s already committed half for the TAF TANFASLDK ASLFLKWE and the POOP.

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2008-03-24 09:56:38

Hyperinflation would be the result since our dollar would be worth as much as an overpriced, gutted McMansion that’s HELOC’d into oblivion.

But, that’s the plan: the Wall Street pigs get rich and they can hose the one group that they’ve been unable to bring under control - the savers.

 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-03-24 05:38:52

Bill Gross is working very hard to solidify his bid for Scumbag of the Year. Pimpco sounds like another company that has no business on the American landscape. The whole system is broken. Too bad Bill Gross’ jaw isn’t.

Comment by CA renter
2008-03-24 09:37:20

Agree. Bill Gross has known about the “housing” bubble for years. There is no excuse if he’s holding onto crap paper.

He needs to shut his trap. Unless he plans to give up all of his wealth to bail out these idiots, he can keep his damn hands out of our (taxpayers’) pockets.

 
 
Comment by JP
2008-03-24 05:40:34

Interesting article, proposing that an RTC-like entity should be created for the CLOs CMOs, not the underlying real-estate assets.

As a bailout, it would be a lot more plausible than going after the RE. It doesn’t sound very politically plausible though.

Comment by CrackerJim
2008-03-24 06:33:49

In today’s political environment, anything is possible if not likely.

 
 
Comment by Lostcontrol
2008-03-24 05:42:55

RC,
just the tightening of lending standards anone will insure that home prices continue to decline. The pool of “greater fools/prices always goes up” has just shrunk dramatically. The FED can buy all the MBS’s they want, but going forward, who will buy over inflated houses. The models are broken. Confidence is gone. The myth of ever increasing home values have been proven to be false.

 
Comment by watcher
2008-03-24 05:47:08

not just the Fed:

Central banks and governments in advanced economies will be forced to buy mortgage-backed securities within the next few months to stop the credit crisis, according to a former chief economist of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

“Central banks will be managers for years to come of rather interesting portfolios,” predicted Professor Willem Buiter of the London School of Economics, as the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England sought to play down conversations officials have had regarding purchases of mortgagerelated assets.

http://tinyurl.com/2odkxk

Comment by motepug
2008-03-24 06:49:09

“Central banks will be managers for years to come of rather interesting portfolios,”

One can only imagine how screwed up this will work out. The fact of the matter is J6P can’t pay for all the crap they bought, and the US Govt can only pay for wars, bread and circuses by printing more t-bills or money. Pretty soon, we should just scrap the Federal Reserve Note, and use t-bills to pay for day to day expenses, something like US notes that JFK tried.

 
Comment by technovelist
2008-03-24 15:50:14

I’ve been predicting this for several years. Of course, it will unleash a hyperinflationary financial hurricane that will wipe out anyone in its way. But you can’t have everything!

Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2008-03-24 17:14:58

‘it will unleash a hyperinflationary financial hurricane ‘

For how long and how deep though? Even the financial men of genius must realize that angry mobs have nothing to lose at some point.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-03-24 05:48:29

rejection:

Lenders are rejecting more loan applicants with strong credit scores, the latest indication the nation’s credit crunch is deepening and further depressing the housing market and the economy.

more stories like thisMortgage companies are growing more cautious and tightening lending standards for some of their most credit-worthy customers - from increasing down payments for home purchases to requiring higher credit scores for loan approvals.

http://tinyurl.com/yreh4g

Comment by combotechie
2008-03-24 06:15:19

Evidence that portrays cash as king.

Comment by exeter
2008-03-24 06:22:21

From all indications last week, central banks are dumping gold. ;)

Comment by Blue Skye
2008-03-24 08:17:30

What are the indications?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2008-03-24 08:47:13

Central banks been dumping Gold for 30 years, now.

Most of their wealth is long gone…

 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 07:23:00

Just means that prices need to come down to the FHA limits in most markets to get transactions going again.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 10:00:40

Or the FHA limits need to get up to the level of prices to get transactions going again?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-03-24 05:50:32

bad bets:

ATLANTIC CITY - Even before the recent demise of Wall Street investment firm Bear Stearns & Co. Inc., casino operators were beginning to wonder about financing for their dream developments in this gambling town.
To some, the cost of entering the nation’s second-largest gambling market was no longer within reach - something unexpected two years ago when three operators announced they were buying land here.

http://tinyurl.com/2jjvbt

 
Comment by taxmeupthebooty
2008-03-24 05:56:09

an economic “girlie man”
im McCarty decided a year ago to give real estate agents an added incentive to guide buyers past the clutter of for-sale signs to his vacant four-bedroom house about 20 miles outside of Minneapolis. He agreed to pay his agent an 8% commission, which would be split (55%/45%) with the agent representing the buyer. Full-service agents in the past few years have been charging 6% commissions and frequently less. Discount brokers charge much less.

 
Comment by achtungpv
2008-03-24 06:08:52

Got a certified letter from my mortgage lender telling me that if I paid off my mortgage in full they would pay off 5% of the principle for me.

Comment by Tom
2008-03-24 06:10:09

Refinance?

Comment by JP
2008-03-24 06:56:35

Desperation for cash?

 
Comment by achtungpv
2008-03-24 13:48:04

It’s Provident Funding. No refinance. The letter states implicitly that if I would refinance with someone else, they’ll pay 5% of my principal for me.

I’m pretty content with my 30year 6.6% fixed so I’ll just let them ride it out.

 
 
Comment by alambka
2008-03-24 07:44:58

Who is your lender? my servicer is citimortgage and I owe 65,000. I have been daydreaming about offering payoff in return for a discount.
I don’t know if my loan was securitized or not.

 
Comment by zeropointzero
2008-03-24 09:51:54

I guess you have a nice 5.5% fixed that they would like to get back now. If they’re offering 5% off the principal balance, they obviously think it’s worth more to them. I like my fixed loan as a decent inflation and dollar-devaluation hedge, at least.

Comment by technovelist
2008-03-24 16:05:54

I like my fixed loan as a decent inflation and dollar-devaluation hedge, at least.

Me too. That way I don’t have to worry about our emergency fund being demolished by inflation, as that would also demolish our mortgage.

 
 
 
Comment by Mike
2008-03-24 06:16:11

Clinton has said she wants to appoint Alan Greenspan to look into the sub-prime mess! Am I living in the bizzaro world?! She’s appointing that economic clown, Mr. Magoo, to look into something he created! This is my turning point and it’s going to hurt but I have to vote for John McCain. Not a good choice for me seeing as I’m a liberal but it’s either vote for a candidate who will hold press meetings with Al Sharpton standing on his left and Jesse Jackson on his right - or Hilary Clinton who is just another Washington Hack engaged in the “inner circle” musical chairs game. Alan Greenspan - sheeesh! We are in BIG trouble in this country.

Comment by safe_as_apartments
2008-03-24 06:44:26

Don’t believe anything said during campaigns. Clinton is just name-dropping and playing on the nostalgic sympathies of the electorate, who feel that the economy was so much better when Greenspan was at the Fed. This will go nowhere, slowly.

 
Comment by edhopper
2008-03-24 07:22:20

Not that I disagree with your assessment of what Clinton said. But before you jump to McCain, you should read Paul Krugman’s column today. McCain’s economic people are so much worse than anyone Hilary or Barak might have. Phil the banker Graham and Dow 36,000 Hasert. Bad news.

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 07:35:02

Don’t think you need to worry about it. She has about as much chance of being elected as I do.

Comment by desertdweller
2008-03-24 08:44:06

Tx
I think this site participants would vote for you!

Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 08:46:19

You’d be sorry too. First thing I’d do is shut down all the meatpacking plants in the U.S. No more In and Out Burger or Mickey D.

Still want to vote for me?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by REhobbyist
2008-03-24 09:29:37

tx: you just lost my vote! The occasional cheeseburger is my favorite vice!

 
Comment by CrackerJim
2008-03-24 09:45:04

No problem!
The meatpacking plants can just move to Mexico.
The employees would just be back in their home town.

 
Comment by desertdweller
2008-03-24 13:03:20

Had a Ruby’s burger for easter, hmm, go ahead move meatpackers ‘offshore’. Vegetables are better for us.

VOTE FOR TXCHICK

 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2008-03-24 19:43:47

Late to the rest of this thread but have to throw in a “good on ya” there, chick - no greater hands-over-the eyes denial going on in the world than the meat business.

 
 
 
Comment by DavidCee
2008-03-24 10:28:34

“Don’t think you need to worry about it. She has about as much chance of being elected as I do.”

Txchick57, you crack me up. A women running for president, the chance for gender equality, and all you want is a “cat fight”. What is it about females that want to destroy their own? I guess a 70 year old white guy suffering from dimencia is a good choice over a 60 year old woman with experience and flaws.

Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 12:20:44

If I’m looking for gender equality, I’d prefer someone who is deserving on their own merits; not one whose “experience” consists of being on the bottom in the bedroom.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by desertdweller
2008-03-24 13:04:39

A lot of experience is gained on the bottom.

 
Comment by technovelist
2008-03-24 16:09:20

If I’m looking for gender equality, I’d prefer someone who is deserving on their own merits; not one whose “experience” consists of being on the bottom in the bedroom.

Why do you think she has spent much time on the bottom?

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 17:46:29

Have you taken a really good look at Bill? He looks like W.C. Fields.

 
 
 
 
Comment by spike66
2008-03-24 07:40:12

Check out the Charlie Rose interview with Paul Volcker, on PBS website. Volcker is backing Obama.

 
Comment by REhobbyist
 
Comment by CA renter
2008-03-24 09:40:25

Ralph Nader.

At least he’s honest about what’s been going on in the credit & housing markets. He’s not talking about any bailouts that I can see.

 
 
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-03-24 06:25:02

wife just emailed me-

bear stearns is starting to let people go today and there are no less than 3 nypd cars in front of the building in case anyone goes apeshit

Comment by WT Economist
2008-03-24 06:41:54

I thought Wall Street likes it when people are laid off, as other workers are frightened into working harder for less and profits go up.

Comment by mgnyc99
2008-03-24 06:54:02

depends how many are being let go i guess

this is not one person more like half the floor type of stuff i believe

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 07:57:13

Good thing the PC revolution has made us all so much more efficient, as it sounds like they may need to substitute lots of technological capital for all the labor they are letting go in order to make sure output keeps growing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Tulpenwoerde
2008-03-24 09:35:47

Yes, thankfully the “productivity miracle” due to communications technology will continue to ensure increasing output — sort of a Moore’s Law for workplace efficiency.

Just finished Bill Fleckenstein’s new book the other night. Probably not going to win any literary prizes (sorry, Bill), but an interesting read nonetheless. He makes some very interesting points regarding the wildly overstated “productivity gains” of the last few years. I’m assuming that this is also PB’s comment, made tongue-in-cheek.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 10:14:32

The productivity miracle of new technology was a centerpiece of AG’s New Era theory that helped fuel the tech stock bubble and crash. Wonder if AG and Rubin will account for this among the various root causes of the housing bubble they identify in their upcoming analysis?

 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-03-24 12:10:59

Wonder if AG and Rubin will account for this among the various root causes of the housing bubble they identify in their upcoming analysis?

Wonder if they’ll pull the old “but no one could’ve foreseen this” angle? (A la Condi Rice.)

 
 
 
 
Comment by JP
2008-03-24 06:59:30

Only 3 nypd cars? The BS people must not be in good physical shape.

Comment by Skip
2008-03-24 09:50:00

Well, I’m sure that they don’t give football scholarships to MBA school for a reason.

 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-03-24 10:44:05

Ooooh! Keep us updated, mgnyc99!

 
 
Comment by exeter
2008-03-24 06:41:52

http://tinyurl.com/35fg9v

Countrywide scum lining things up to further bleed housedebtors dry.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 07:26:10

So nice that these parasites have found themselves some new hosts.

 
Comment by REhobbyist
2008-03-24 08:02:02

A partnership between Countrywide and Blackrock. Yech. They’ll make a lot of money from both housedebtors and sucker investors for a few years, run up their stock, cashout, then go under under a cloud of scandal.

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2008-03-24 06:58:54

Cramer just said “the American public doesn”t know jack”

Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 07:08:23

Obviously true since he is still on the air.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 07:54:23

Where does Jimbo get his insider information? Is it legal?

Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 07:56:40

No. He’s been investigated by the SEC at least once but he’s a lawyer and knows how to cover the tracks.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 08:00:58

He must have great sources, given that he claims to know more than the top brass at the Fed…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 08:35:21

The Jon Stewart footage of Jimbo pumping BSC stock just before the price collapse is destined to become a credit bust classic…

 
Comment by ACH
2008-03-24 09:32:12

Hmm, does any seriously listen to Cramer? He’s fun, but I wouldn’t buy a pair of “dead man’s shoes” from a second hand store on his recommendation. He really doesn’t know anything. That is obvious. I do listen to NBR and take their analysis seriously. Of course, they don’t recommend stocks. They report the financial news.
Cramer? ROTFLMAO until I puke.
Roidy

 
Comment by ACH
2008-03-24 11:41:47

The so called “financial engineering” that WS engaged in should have been suspect from the start. LTCM was the first. It’s mistakes were closely evaluated and then the game began again. It appears that the assumptions were not well understood and yet CDO’s SIV’s, MBS’s, are called “financial engineering” and are touted as a breakthrough. This stuff is not engineering. To wit, there are no 1) “best practices” standard, 2) adequate peer review, 3) subsequent blind testing of the products, designs, or concepts, 4) postmortem of the test results. What went on is not engineering at least the way I understand the concept. What the financial people understand is not clear. They are scared by what they don’t know, that IS clear. What they should be scared of is: 1)what they don’t know that they don’t know, and 2)what they think they know but is wrong.
Take a look at this link on FORA. The idiot that is giving this talk is an example of flawed assumptions and inadequate testing of assumption. It isn’t engineering. Watch the whole program. Especially his justification part of $400 million salaries of “these very smart people”.
Idiot.
Roidy
URL: http://fora.tv/2008/02/12/Credit_Crises_of_Central_Banks_Future_Risks

 
Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 19:14:54

The Federal Reserve of New York never put up a penny for the LTCM bailout.

“…The crisis will leave many casualties. Particularly hard hit will be much of today’s financial risk-valuation system, significant parts of which failed under stress. Those of us who look to the self-interest of lending institutions to protect shareholder equity have to be in a state of shocked disbelief….”
Mr. Alan Greenspan
March 16, 2008

 
 
Comment by FED Up
2008-03-24 10:10:01

probably doesn’t hurt his BFF is Eliot Spitzer

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by 45north
2008-03-24 07:15:11

http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/amerman/2008/0320.html
Daniel Amerman
last year was Scenario B
this year is Scenario F as in fortitude which is what we will need

masters of the universe really did make some spectacularly stupid moves

Comment by Blue Skye
2008-03-24 08:49:23

Scenario G: include Prime

Scenario H: include commercial

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-03-24 07:16:49

“Yoshihisa Nakashima in front of his condominium building in the suburb of Kashiwa, far from his government job in Tokyo. His apartment is worth half of what he paid 14 years ago, during the real estate bubble.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/25/business/yourmoney/25japan.htm

 
Comment by watcher
2008-03-24 07:23:09

smartest knife catchers in the room:

Investment management firms BlackRock Inc. and Highfields Capital Management said Monday they are sponsoring a new company that will acquire and restructure distressed mortgages.

http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8VJQF7O1.htm

 
Comment by matt
2008-03-24 07:24:03

I take it nar inventory numbers do not take in account properties pulled off the market.

Comment by ozajh
2008-03-24 07:41:37

Correct.

They are also NOT seasonally adjusted, so it is almost always the case that the months-of-inventory measure falls each month between January and April.

(Doesn’t stop the NAR trumpeting the “improvement”, however.) ;)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 07:52:27

I don’t believe there is at present any available means to account for latent inventory = homes the sellers would gladly be selling at last year’s price, but which they have taken off the market until some hoped-for day in the future when real estate goes back up to where it was. If you understand the economic concept of short term supply, then you can think of this latent inventory as representing a portion of the supply curve that lies between last year’s and this year’s market values. The long-term supply curve is flatter, as some of these homes will eventually need to be sold regardless due to life-cycle factors (retirements, deaths, bankruptcies, etc).

Comment by matt
2008-03-24 08:03:18

Does that factor play out in the late ’80’s cali bust where price rises were capped for about 10 years?

 
 
 
Comment by ozajh
2008-03-24 07:37:36

February existing home sales.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/23777672/

Sales up 2.9%, median price down a bit over 2% from January and down 8.2% YOY.

No sign of a bottom in these numbers.

Comment by WT Economist
2008-03-24 07:44:29

Yeah, but they are cutting prices to increase sales. Keep it up and we might get this bust over with by early 2009.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 07:46:00

The increase in sales is being taken by the REIC as yet another sign that a bottom is at hand. My thought is that a faster rate of sales coupled with broadening awareness of big price declines could be somewhat akin to the increase in earth movement that occurs as an avalanche starts really moving downhill, but I admit to having a somewhat bearish point of view.

Comment by matt
2008-03-24 08:11:58

They don’t factor in rising rates, treasuries are getting killed. Now that the government is going to guarantee mortgages, where will that put rates?

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 08:38:06

I think the idea is to lower rates by including a taxpayer-funded mortgage guarantee. Lenders who would otherwise have to charge a risk premium to cover the chance that a buyer will send back jingle mail will be able to rest assured that Uncle Sam will backstop mortgage losses. Hence no risk premium is necessary.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by matt
2008-03-24 08:50:41

Doesn’t that transfer the risk to treasuries?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 09:09:04

“Doesn’t that transfer the risk to treasuries?”

Perhaps…

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-03-24 10:09:41

Imagine making your mortgage check out to the IRS.

House arrest.

 
 
 
Comment by sevenofnine
2008-03-24 10:11:09

Are foreclosures that were bought back by the banks included in the sales number?

 
 
Comment by AdamCO
2008-03-24 07:58:54

is this sales up 2.9% yoy or from last month?

Comment by ozajh
2008-03-24 08:07:45

Seasonally adjusted MOM.

 
Comment by tiger
2008-03-24 08:54:04

Didn’t someone here predict around a weeks ago that they would be posting increased sales for a month coming off of a low sales winter month? Sales increase of 11.3% in the NE and a decrease of 1.1 in the West. Why the big difference?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 08:45:28

Only the West saw sales decrease, with sales down 1.1 percent, while the other regions saw sales rise. Home sales were up 11.3 percent in the Northeast, 2.5 percent in the Midwest and 2.1 percent in the South.”

Comment by Blano
2008-03-24 09:00:16

Any mention of how many of those were foreclosures??

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 07:40:41

Inflation packing a wallop for middle-, low-income
By Neil Irwin and Alejandro Lazo
THE WASHINGTON POST
March 24, 2008

WASHINGTON – Inflation is walloping Americans with low and moderate incomes as the prices of staples have soared far faster than those of luxuries.

The goods and services Americans consume were 4 percent more expensive in February than a year earlier. But there is a big divide in how much prices are climbing between the basic items people need to live and get to work, and those on which they can easily cut back when times are tight.

Comment by combotechie
2008-03-24 10:51:12

This makes sense in a cash-strapped environment. Necessities are bid up in price by the scant amount of cash available. Since there is is little cash left over to bid up the prices of frivolous items - of bling - the price of bling declines.

 
 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-03-24 07:48:29

The house I’m renting in SE Utah has been on the market since I moved in (almost 6 months ago). Talked to the landlady last night. She’s declaring bankruptcy (as I mentioned last week) and has now decided to lower the price (on my advice).

LL: “It’s absolutely horrible what the mortgage companies and banks have done to everyone!!!”

Me: “Oh? How so?”

LL: “Oh, you know, they lure you in, just like all those companies advertising, they make you want stuff until you buy it.”

Me: “Oh?”

LL: “Yeah, they’re to blame for this bjg mess we’re all in.”

Me: “Well, they didn’t lure me in. In fact, I sold my house.”

LL: “It’s only because you don’t watch TV.”

The sheeple seem to be waking up, even though are somewhat confused.

Comment by desertdweller
2008-03-24 08:52:01

Thank goodness, for moi, that the writers strike was so long.
It got me over my ‘ad diction’.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-03-24 09:11:39

BE CAREFUL…… The security deposit, you might lose it in her BK, even if you have a years lease. Best to file a claim for it, unless you think you can con her into letting you live out the security.

And BE CAREFUL, landlords have been known to sink into the gutter when desperate, and after you move sue you for the unpaid rent on your lease. Especially if you move hundreds of miles away. So always get a signed notarized copy stating the lease has been terminated by both parties,and all monies have been paid….at least you could send that to the court as a defense. And save you from driving hours and showing up.

Most tenants don’t know this , but a Lease works BOTH WAYS, if a landlord wants you to break the lease they have to pay you to move.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-03-24 12:36:21

Hey, we’re out here in the Wild West, DJ, and that means no lease, no deposit, no last month, just a handshake and first month’s rent. So not to worry. The house comes furnished, so I can be out in literally minutes if the Injuns go on the warpath.

Of course, it also means if somebody screws up, you can just hang ‘em. :)

 
Comment by desertdweller
2008-03-24 13:24:48

Really good advice NY er.

 
 
Comment by REhobbyist
2008-03-24 09:33:16

“It’s only because you don’t watch TV.”

Precious.

Comment by jim A
2008-03-24 10:06:33

You might think that the reverse would be true. ISTR reading an abstract of a study on the effects of exposure to TV adversting on children. The main effect: greatly increased skepticism. They learned that TV ads were very misleading, and the toys wern’t nearly as fun as the looked. Why have so many adults never leaned this lesson?

Comment by combotechie
2008-03-24 10:38:29

“Why hve so many adults never learned this lesson?”

Because children are in touch with, are tuned into the world and adults have become tuned out.
Adults have learned to “explain away” the messages of their inner-Selves.
Children have yet to reach that point; That point arrives with the coming of puberty.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 11:10:19

“It’s only because you don’t watch TV.”

Aha! Neither do I…

 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-03-24 07:55:13

Question for aladinsane; were you able to buy physical on the PM dip last week? Most dealers never brought prices down. The sell-off seemed to be only in the paper market.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-03-24 08:23:51

I can buy physical, but things are a bit pricey…

On the basis of $924 Gold, old 1 oz ae’s cost me around $965, 1 oz kr’s are around $945, both on a wholesale basis.

 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2008-03-24 08:44:00

Have you considered old Liberty $5 or $10 on eBay, VF-AU? They will definitely follow the market down - in fact, the weaker the market is, the closer to spot you can generally buy - and you have the downside scarcity value protection.

Comment by watcher
2008-03-24 09:12:41

Numismatic, right? Not my thing, but thanks. With dealers requiring big minimum purchases (5-10k) and not dropping prices I might consider taking delivery on futures contract if we see another ‘paper’ sell-off. I’m looking at silver, gold has not come down enough for me.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-03-24 09:34:56

For what it’s worth…

Many coin dealers i’ve talked to lately, and were around 30 years ago, relate that things are reminiscent of mid 1979.

Busy might be an understatement~

One big wholesaler in San Diego is so swamped and could work 38 hours a day if he wanted to, decided to take a month off, for rest & relaxation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 10:16:48

Sounds like the PM bubble may die due to capacity constraints…

 
Comment by lost in the bubble
2008-03-24 12:31:22

aladinsane, I live in San Diego and have wanted to purchase some PM. Who do you recommend locally?

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-03-24 12:39:29

I never make recommendations specifically…

There are a number of coin dealers in your area that have been in business for a long time.

Look them up in your yellow pages, and google the names of their businesses, to make sure they are fair with their customers…

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by claimjumper
2008-03-24 08:27:03

Just curious, WTF is a person to think when they sell BSC call options short based on news released by the Fed? Then the next week we are told never mind, the price is no longer 2 it is 10. To my way of thinking we have just crossed the line to social anarchy and no more contract laws in the good ol USA. We are becoming a complete joke around the world. F___ the Fed!!!!!!

Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 08:44:12

why would anyone do that. that’s insane.

Comment by matt
2008-03-24 08:54:37

At least you are making money, 40% gain into a 30% loss. I need to listen to you more often, my trading sucks.

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 09:11:08

TANSTAAFL

Comment by matt
2008-03-24 09:29:57

At least i have some powder left. 1400 spx for a tradeable pullback?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 09:47:58

looks to me like either 1380 or 1440.

 
Comment by matt
2008-03-24 09:54:19

I’ll take 1440 for $2,000, Alex.

 
 
Comment by newt
2008-03-24 12:52:15

TANSTAAFL…cool. I’m reading The Moon is a Harsh Mistress right now.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by desertdweller
2008-03-24 13:28:53

OKAY what does That mean?

tanstaafl?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 13:34:31

there’s no such thing as a free lunch

the poster sold BSC calls short thinking they’d definitely go out worthless; i.e., free money

ain’t no free money that I know of

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by claimjumper
2008-03-24 08:50:13

I must be crazy then! I assumed once the Fed was involved a deal was a deal. I couldn’t borrow stock. Txchick please explain what part of that deal did I miss?

Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 08:55:42

There is no deal until the shareholders vote on the issue/

Comment by matt
2008-03-24 09:23:41

Does this put bsc into play now that jpm has raised the bid?

Comment by matt
2008-03-24 09:35:42
(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 09:09:47

It just defied common sense. I read $2 and I bid 25% above that in the premarket. Nobody would sell to me. I bid 33% higher and no one would sell to me.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 09:24:55

IMO, the LTCM deal was a one-shot. This time around, there naturally are too many too-big-to-fail entities to strike deals with all of them. I will defer to the way this unraveling plays out for evidence on whether my conjecture is correct.

Comment by Asparagus
2008-03-24 09:38:12

“Too big to fail” becomes “Too big to save”.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 10:15:33

“Too big to bail”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2008-03-24 17:46:08

Tend to agree with you Professor Bear ,how many firms and upside down borrowers can the Feds save ? Of course if Crammer has a fit on national television ,you never know .

Now I’m really getting the popcorn out and watching the spin .

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 08:57:03

Is a successful respiking of the bubble in the works, including another future wave of overbuilding? Folks who are leading the rally in homebuilder shares must think so.

Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 09:01:31

they’ve got to loosen up money first

Comment by catspit1
2008-03-24 09:30:49

Tx, is there a reading list that goes with the buzz & banter recommendation? thanks for that one, i am going to sheck it out…

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 09:03:01

MARKETWATCH FIRST TAKE

Sermon on what counts

Commentary: After much preaching about prices, home sellers get religion
By MarketWatch
Last update: 11:43 a.m. EDT March 24, 2008

CHICAGO (MarketWatch) — You might be tempted to think that there was a remarkable resurrection in the housing market in February, given the news that existing-homes sales rose for the first time in seven months. But remember, Easter wasn’t until March.

If there was an epiphany a month early, it came from home sellers who seem to have gotten the message that the way to move inventory in this dismal market is to beat the competition on price. The median price of existing homes sold in February dropped a record 8.2% from a year earlier, to $195,900.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 09:04:30

Can someone please elucidate me about how record used home price declines are a bullish signal for the builder shares?

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2008-03-24 09:44:28

Same reason aggressive FFR decreases are bullish for Dow, S&P?

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 09:22:15

BSC shareholders seem quite unhappy about getting thrown under the bus.

JPMorgan in Negotiations to Raise Bear Stearns Bid
By ANDREW ROSS SORKIN
Published: March 24, 2008

JPMorgan Chase was in talks on Sunday night for a deal that would quintuple its offer for Bear Stearns, the beleaguered investment bank, in an effort to pacify angry Bear shareholders, according to people involved in the negotiations.

Comment by WT Economist
2008-03-24 09:40:01

They want their fair share of the $30 billion in taxpayer dollars, funded by higher taxes, higher inflation, and benefit cuts for the poor.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 10:02:10

Right — forgot about that $30 bn liquidity injection from the U.S. tax base to stave off a global economic calamity…

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 10:03:30

Sorry — I guess I should have said “monetary base” not “tax base;” also I guess this is a loan, not a grant?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 12:16:53

BK is not nice to shareholders. The shareholders are lucky to get a dime.

 
 
 
Comment by matt
2008-03-24 09:46:54

I clarified some thoughts in a post yesterday on how railroads are going to save the day.
I meant most of the otr freight has already been switched to the rails. The railroads will have to increase capacity to win

over some more. The yard i work in the current layout is already maxed out. (yard has been open 5 years) That also

includes local infastrucure that needs to be expanded to handle the freight. Google Earth has a good shot of the yard i work

at in it’s early stages of operation. (terra shot shows the yard under construction, ammunition bunkers are visible south of

the yard)
http://www.entrepreneur.com/tradejournals/article/171140041.html
http://terraserver-usa.com/image.aspx?T=4&S=11&Z=16&X=1009&Y=11456&W=1

Comment by 45north
2008-03-24 19:59:03

Matt: US and Canada need to switch priority from highways to rail. Housing bubble is just an example of dysfunction. The days of “see the USA in your Chevrolet” are ending.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGZvQoPxhNs

 
 
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-03-24 09:50:21

Don’t Fight the Fed;

Ok, I’m jumping out of my safe 90 day bonds on thursday.
There is a lot of money to move out and instead of monthly income it will be quarterly. I’m scared, as usual, but I don’t want to give it away!
I won’t fight the fed, I will turn tail and run from the fed.

Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 16:37:23

“Gentlemen who prefer bonds don’t know what they are missing.”
Peter Principle #2

 
 
Comment by CA renter
2008-03-24 09:51:05

Since everybody (but us lowlifes) is being bailed out, how about short traders?

I admit to not listening to Txchick & Hoz (did get out of some short positions & took some long, but not nearly enough) and had my a$$ handed to me over the last week — big time.

Since the Fed is bailing the “alphabet soup” holders out, seems they’re the ones who’ve caused shorts some significant losses — all because of what some would think are illegal and totally unethical moves.

Where’s our bailout?

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-03-24 10:45:12

CA renter, what did you lose money on?
When I want to lose money, I invest in small increments.

Comment by CA renter
2008-03-24 20:32:31

I trade options, among other things. If not for the Fed and Treasury’s meddling, my positons would have paid off handsomely.

I was lucky/smart enough to get about 75% out of my short positions before the first 400-point rally the other week, but got back in the next day (and doubled-up, in a few cases).

Yes, it’s gambling. No, it’s not “productive work”. I don’t anticipate being bailed out if I make the wrong decision…and IF the markets are allowed to work freely, but this just ticks me off! :(

Can’t fight the Fed… :(

 
 
Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 10:48:00

lol

Short traders are never protected. Fact of life. You are anti American going against the great society. A despised creature that is trying to profit off of other peoples misery. (As an aside, Yes I got very long, so long that All I could envision in my dreams was a bank failure this morning to cost me much of this years profit. I could not sleep last night.)

Yes I am still long one US bank stock and now short half a dozen US bank stocks. I will sleep a lot better.

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-03-24 11:16:14

True story,
I’ve had two dreams where txchick is waiting for me to buy some stocks so she can short them. She’s tough.
I put a pyramid next to my bed last night.
Remember in the 80’s when people build indoor pyramids.
I think it worked!

Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 11:25:01

A dream about Txchick shorting stock to you? Funny, She had the same dream about shorting stock to you. You’re fried. Give up now, before they reset the trap.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-03-24 11:35:29

No Hoz, she already shorted the ciena I owned in the 90’s.
I covered all my new purchases.

 
Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 12:05:01

She is just watching to see what you do, then bam - she fills your order. lol

 
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-03-24 12:09:09

F yeah. That crappy XM I’ve been holding for nothing is going to move today.
The pyramid worked.

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 12:15:14

I have a ton of SIRI. I’m determined to be there when that damn merger gets approved.

 
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-03-24 12:33:00

You mean you are going to short it?
At what price?

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 12:39:15

No, hell no. I put the Bear Stearns money into it. Very long~

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by desertdweller
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 10:07:01

Don’t these genius analysts know that the early 1990s recession ended maybe five years before housing bottomed out?

MARKET SNAPSHOT
U.S. stocks jump on bigger Bear Stearns bid
Positive February data reported on troubled housing sector
By Kate Gibson, MarketWatch
Last update: 1:00 p.m. EDT March 24, 2008

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — U.S. stocks on Monday extended last week’s solid gains, rallying as J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. agreed to a fivefold increase its acquisition bid for Bear Stearns Cos. and as economic data pointed to signs of stability in the troubled housing sector.

“If we’re in a recession, we’re in the middle of it, and the market is a forward-viewing mechanism,” said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at Jefferies & Co.

Comment by JRinUT
2008-03-24 10:53:45

Ever had the displeasure of watching yourself, in the rear view mirror, about to be rear-ended on the freeway? You take the hit and there’s nothing you can do to avoid it. My point is, however, that it doesn’t work out so well for the driver of the “forward-viewing mechanism” if he isn’t paying any attention to the past/present.

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2008-03-24 10:31:20
 
Comment by JRinUT
2008-03-24 10:43:16

Ever had the displeasure of watching yourself, in the rear view mirror, about to be rear-ended on the freeway? You take the hit and there’s nothing you can do to avoid it. My point is, however, that it doesn’t work out so well for the driver of the “forward-viewing mechanism” if he issn’t paying any attention to the past/present.

Comment by JRinUT
2008-03-24 11:11:00

DISREGARD THE ABOVE POST, PLEASE!

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 11:06:41

Is this another sign of the incipient recovery?

Bank of America may write down $6.5 billion: analyst
By MarketWatch
Last update: 3:34 p.m. EDT March 22, 2008

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 11:08:06

Analyst: Wachovia facing future writedowns, lower earnings
By Riley McDermid
Last update: 8:19 a.m. EDT March 24, 2008

Comment by Paul in Jax
2008-03-24 19:56:38

WAC, the Wells Fargo of the east coast. This ain’t subprime, this is quality banking, risk-free, really.

 
 
Comment by ACH
2008-03-24 11:44:48

Sure, looks like a recovery to me. They fished the car out of the swamp with the body in the trunk.
Roidy

Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 16:30:58

“Never bet on a comeback while they’re playing “Taps”.”
Peter Lynch

 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2008-03-24 11:50:29

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) —
Last week, Clinton released plans for a $30 billion emergency housing fund that would go to states and localities to help head off foreclosures.
The New York senator is also supporting a bill that would expand the government’s capacity to guarantee mortgages that are reworked on affordable terms.
“This would be good for families, who can keep their homes. It would be good for mortgage lenders, because it’s more profitable than foreclosures. It would be good for our economy, helping to unfreeze our credit markets,” Clinton said in a speech at the University of Pennsylvania.

http://tinyurl.com/22gsbk

Comment by aladinsane
2008-03-24 12:08:53

Isn’t it somewhat amusing that $30 billion, is the same exact number that was needed to bail out Bear Stearns, last week?

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 13:35:19

Writedowns come in $3 bn denominations; XXXXXXXs come in $30 bn denominations (except for those that come in $200 bn denominations).

 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 12:24:27

XM/Siri gets antitrust approval, here we go!

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-03-24 12:34:18

Tx, when do you short it?
Hell, I just want my money back.

Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 12:35:36

I dunno. I think it’s going to up.

Dumped my S&P and Dow calls to concentrate on Nasdaq and tech trades.

 
 
Comment by Xpovos
2008-03-24 12:41:06

Yay! About time. I still don’t want to have to admit how much I’ve lost holding the SIRI bag. But at least I’m making a bit of it back now.

Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 12:43:49

One of the worst trades of my life was in XMSR. I bought a boatload of it in the fall of ‘02 at 1.75 on down to 1.60 or so.

Sold it at like 6, thought that was a great return. Well, I guess it was but it went to 40 from there.

Comment by Xpovos
2008-03-24 12:48:23

Per your BSC comments this morning.
“I made [money] on the downside and some on the upside so I guess I should just shut up and be happy.”
Heh. It’s painful to watch potential gains slip away, but -much- more painful to be sitting on losses.

Keep playing it safe. I’m learning from this experience.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 13:44:29

Were you called by a broker or party that suggested you sell the stock, before you sold? Just curious. I dislike getting run out of a stock before the major move.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2008-03-24 13:52:24

No. At more than 100% of the alleged buyout price, I didn’t feel I had an edge any longer. I love bottom fishing but when the price no longer jibes with what I think I know, I sell. Usually that’s a good idea, this time it was a horrible idea.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 12:50:28

Part of the group I never trade. Have fun! Maybe I’ll be reincarnated as a tech trader. I’ll just stick with my 4% rule. Buy for $1, sell for $4 = 4%

Comment by Xpovos
2008-03-24 12:53:22

Can you explain? That looks more like 400%. And a good trade in anybody’s book.

Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 13:12:24

Just a joke from a HS friend that could not do math and ended up making a lot of money with what he called “The 4% rule”.

The moral of the story is that you don’t have to be a brilliant math genius (RE: Merriwether) to make moneys. Take care of the losses and the profits can take care of themselves.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Xpovos
2008-03-24 13:18:55

Ah! So simple, and right on target.

Also fits my school of losses experience. I’ve made money on every trade, except SIRI, and I’m holding it as a result. Not a good combination. Better for me to have sold it years ago and invested elsewhere.

 
 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2008-03-24 19:58:46

Buy for 1 sell for 4 is 300%, just for future reference.;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Blano
2008-03-24 13:03:58

LOL

 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-03-24 12:48:49

every time I think the Fed can’t get in a bigger mess, they do:

The Federal Reserve has been put in an awkward position by JPMorgan Chase’s (JPM) decision to raise its bid for Bear Stearns (BSC) to $10 a share from $2. The sweetened bid, announced on Mar. 24, is high enough that Bear’s shareholders are getting some real value for the company—while the Federal Reserve still risks suffering big losses.

http://tinyurl.com/3bqvtb

Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 14:08:26

“The Federal Reserve has been put in an awkward position…”

The Federal Reserve put themselves into an awkward position. The Federal Reserve came up with a plan that guaranteed $8B in unsecured bonds from Bear Stearns. It will be no surprise for Congress to veto the Federal Reserve actions and let Bear go into BK.

Normally unsecured debt is the first to go bye bye, then goes the shareholder equity, then preferred stock and finally the secured bonds.

Now the public is being asked to pick up the tab for the unsecured, preferred stock and corporate secured debt. A few members of congress will regard this unfavorably.

Comment by JimAtLaw
2008-03-24 15:28:58

Let’s hope so. A Bear BK would be good for the system - reality at last.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 17:44:45

JPM gets the prime rib, and Uncle Sam gets the scraps that fall from the master’s table. Sounds fair to me.

 
 
 
Comment by PontiacMI
2008-03-24 13:11:54

I have a question. With the amount of loans gone bad, have we hit a point of real money contraction regarless of how much is pumped in by the fed?

Comment by Hoz
2008-03-24 13:33:35

RE: The Federal Reserve
“We might as well put a hammer and sickle on the flag.”
Rick Santelli CNBC

 
Comment by combotechie
2008-03-24 14:02:05

“…have we hit a point of real money contraction regardless of how much is pumped in by the fed?”

IMO the real money hasn’t contracted at all; The contraction has been in the thin-air money created by thin-air borrowing using thin-air collaterial.
The real money is still out there and is waiting to snap up, for pennies-on-the-dollar, the assets that were purchased by the thin-air money.

 
 
Comment by tl
2008-03-24 13:21:38
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 13:31:59


Dow 36,000 according to this guy

“32 used & new available from $0.76
Also Available in: List Price: Our Price: Other Offers:
Hardcover (1st) 104 used & new from $0.01
Audio Cassette (Abridged) 20 used & new from $0.01″

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 13:33:34

‘these guys’ (two authors…)

“1st Pbk. Ed edition (November 14, 2000)”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 17:31:45

A penny for their thoughts :-)

 
 
 
Comment by tresho
2008-03-24 13:23:16

T-bill auction results today:
91-day bill: 1.220 %
182-day bill: 1.584 %

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-03-24 13:45:27

I liked the 91 day better when it was 4.75

Comment by Troy
2008-03-25 00:47:58

I actually put $10K of 0% money from BofA through them. Good times, good times.

 
 
 
Comment by Halifax
2008-03-24 16:04:55

Ben -
Thanks for working on this blog. After much colorful language and consultation, I finally prevailed over idiosyncratic browser glitches and was (finally) able to make a PayPal donation. I may not agree with you (”I’ve been hearing about $100 bread for years” - right now, it’s Motel 66 where I live - when was that, 1962 - $6 for a Motel 6 room) or with the board’s resident deflationistas, but hey, many minds make a market (and regarding deflation, yes it’s a Minsky moment - I’m one of those mentioned on Wikipedia who paid $1000+ for his “Can ‘It’ happen again?” - and now it’s reprinted for ~$24 - talk about deflation!). Anyway, thanks again.

 
Comment by oc-ed
2008-03-24 17:40:27

A very interesting John Mauldin piece this week by Peter Bernstein.

“Peter argues persuasively that we are getting ready to enter a new economic and investing environment as profoundly different as the 80s were to the 70s. As I said earlier, take your time and think through the implications of his thoughts.”

http://www.investorsinsight.com/otb.aspx

Comment by cactus
2008-03-24 20:49:09

“This extended period of difficulty is going to bring about a new economic régime, different in many aspects from the experience of most people alive today. ”

Yea thats right the future will be different without easy credit.
John Mauldin must think we are idiots to not have figured that out? And peter is right wages have not grown as fast as expenses so a bunch of morons borrowed against their house to finance their standard of living. So what is going to happen….. it will be different in the future in ways we can’t comprehend, uh huh OK. Sorry I’m just too dumb I need some details.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-03-24 17:42:30

A penny for your loan?

PennyMac

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post