April 5, 2008

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For April 5, 2008

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

241 Comments »

Comment by geekden
2008-04-05 06:57:27

anyone else having network problems this morning? some sites accessible, some not…

Comment by not a gator
2008-04-05 07:39:06

I was just getting comment errors on HBB. Had to come back later to be able to read comments.

Apparently the blog was having an issue, but it’s fixed now.

 
Comment by sd renter
2008-04-05 07:40:25

Ron Paul being interviewed with Glen Beck about how unregulated the FED is.

http://news.goldseek.com/RonPaul/1207152341.php

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-04-05 08:10:49

Yes, everything’s slow, can’t get onto some sites. Not just Ben’s.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-05 09:08:41

America’s Money: In Their Own Words.

Lawdy, lawdy, lawdy, it’s a regular dumbfest out there.

Don’t drink early in the morning, folks! :-D

Comment by hd74man
2008-04-05 14:26:43

RE: America’s Money: In Their Own Words

I read all the stories.

America’s in deep “poo-poo” (as in the diaper variety)

What’s most interesting is the insidious mention of the threat of “divorce” by currently married women as a solution to their financial woes.

Sure honey-we can’t make it on 2 income-so let’s go it alone.

Lots of logic operating here.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ugh
2008-04-05 22:33:28

Memo to Loeslin s: Stop breeding

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by spike66
2008-04-05 07:02:56

Hard to pay those mortgages without a job. The Dems propose another government fix…
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/05/business/05econ.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 07:31:05

Who is going to pay for all of this? We are broke. F—ing a–, we really have some winners in there. Of course, the things they say are just as dumb as the things I hear from those around me. Morons vote for morons.

Comment by Fuzzy Bear
2008-04-05 08:45:56

Morons vote for morons

Morons vote for morons=sheeple.

 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2008-04-05 08:55:05

There’s too much confusion.
I can’t get no relief.

Comment by newt
2008-04-05 15:25:19

Businessmen they drink my wine, plowmen dig my earth…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by jbunniii
2008-04-05 07:32:11

Can’t they at least have the decency to wait until unemployment rises back to its historical trend, let alone to actual recession levels?

 
Comment by cactus
2008-04-05 07:48:39

“We are in for a much longer recession than Wall Street thinks,” he said. “This particular downturn is driven by a rare contraction in consumer spending, and that is starting to hurt a broader range of people than those hurt by the mortgage crisis.”

ya think ?

Comment by polly
2008-04-05 08:01:41

Wasn’t it just a few months ago that people were saying that decreases in consumer spending can’t bring on a recession by itself, there has to be something else? This is just incredible. You really can just make it up as you go along in economics….

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 08:15:22

“Wasn’t it just a few months ago that people were saying that decreases in consumer spending can’t bring on a recession by itself,”

And people were flipping houses in Florida right up until the moment their market crashed. The past 2 years have shown us just how quickly stupid things can die. The pace at times can be absolutely breathtaking. Pretty cool!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by WhatOnceWas
2008-04-05 10:20:41

…and greater fools are loading up on the foreclosure bus tours. Continuous wave of foreclosures continue as those new ‘deal’ prices continue lower and they walk away from those.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Mole Man
2008-04-05 08:02:58

Using a broad brush here does not make any sense. These are a bunch of specific, individual issues being grouped as a package. Exactly what ends up in there if anything is likely to be in flux until this is passed or shelved. The unemployment benefit extension in particular has a lot of support, is one of the few measures likely to make a difference, and would not cost all that much. Even the full price package only costs the same as a few months in Iraq, so those who remain in control are still leading the spending brigade by quite a margin.

None of this is going to have any significant effect on the housing price correction in progress.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 08:18:51

I know there is a lot of support, even on the HBB, for the extension of unemployment benefits. I have not given this topic a whole lot of thought. But in my lifetime I have seen a huge number of people game the unemployment system. They accept jobs under the table and continue to collect those unemployment bennies. I am not as quick as others to view this as some great idea.

Can we please quit justifying spending by using Iraq as justification? Just because Iraq is a massive waste of money, at this point, doesn’t mean we should use it to justify more waste.

Comment by aNYCdj
2008-04-05 08:53:02

Yes and for good reason, in the past most got laid off in a recession, So why not game the system until the recession ended?

But this time is different a lot the jobs will not come back, so it buys time to figure out what to do next in life.

I said this before and i’ll say it again Pres Bush is the GREATEST president in creating underground jobs we have ever had.
———————-
But in my lifetime I have seen a huge number of people game the unemployment system. They accept jobs under the table and continue to collect those unemployment bennies

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2008-04-05 08:56:36

Throw good money after bad.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by denquiry
2008-04-05 09:06:16

I know there is a lot of support, even on the HBB, for the extension of unemployment benefits. I have not given this topic a whole lot of thought. But in my lifetime I have seen a huge number of people game the unemployment system. They accept jobs under the table and continue to collect those unemployment bennies. I am not as quick as others to view this as some great idea.
________________________________________________________
IMO. we should be worrying about the big time crooks (WS and the pols). they affect the system whole lots more than some poor numbnuts padding his unemployment bennies. Hey, JPM just got 39 bill gratis from the taxpayers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 10:32:54

“JPM just got 39 bill gratis from the taxpayers.”

Not exactly; first off, the figure was $29 bn, secondly, it comes as a guarantee, not a lump sum payment, and thirdly, it is an unfunded insurance premium, meaning no taxes needed to be raised to provide for it.

Your point was????

 
Comment by denquiry
2008-04-05 12:37:49

If this is a free market like the PTB says it is and bear stearns went BK then why wasn’t BS remaining assets auctioned off to the highest bidder instead of giving it to JPM for 2 per share (and jumped to 10 a share after the fed govt’s guarantee.) WS put the f*cks to a lot a people with their selling of toxic securities. WS is a rigged game and the house always win. Privatize the profits and when losing put the f*cks to the taxpayer. but IMO, WS is living on borrowed time, but hey, then again…what do I know?

 
 
Comment by BanteringBear
2008-04-05 11:44:10

The unemployment system is a joke. I was laid off one time in my life (10 years ago) and briefly collected. It is very exclusionary as to who is allowed to collect. Many people who should be allowed benefits, are not. And, conversely, many who should not be afforded benefits, are. Another wonderfully run government program - not.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by hd74man
2008-04-05 14:07:29

RE: gaming the system

Gamemanship?

You haven’t seen gamemanship until you’ve seen the public employee pigs working in Mazzland.

This chuck should have been publically flogged on the Beantown Common.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/04/05/big_dig_officials_firing_led_to_windfall

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 10:29:09

“Exactly what ends up in there if anything is likely to be in flux until this is passed or shelved.”

I am expecting lots of gas to get passed; not sure much else will be.

 
 
Comment by implosion
2008-04-05 08:05:05

At the end of the article:

“Parul Vora, 28, who holds a master’s degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, thought she was immune to unemployment — until Yahoo laid her off recently as a researcher in San Francisco earning in the low six figures.

“To me, the layoff was an introduction to the dark side of corporate life,” Ms. Vora said. “It was a reminder that at the end of the day, you are doing breakthrough research for a company that is making decisions about your life, and you have no control over those decisions.”

Another engineer/scientist gets a real-world lesson. Maybe she can get a job as a replacement for one of the many retiring aero-defense engineers? Not a bad salary. I don’t make much more and I’m about 25 years older. Severe salary compression for non-mgt in engineering/science.

Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 08:17:45

It was a reminder that at the end of the day the employees don’t own their jobs, no matter how highly qualified they are.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 08:20:28

Then take the risk of starting your own business. I’m an employee and I never complain about being owned. I know that my alternative is to start my own business and take the risk. That is capitalism. But I hear so many employees cry that it makes me sick.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-05 08:23:57

Perhaps the biggest obstacle to people starting their own business, is cutting the umbilical cord, otherwise known as direct deposit of your paycheck.

 
Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 08:30:31

The only business I ever ran was selling a new fanbelt to a guy whose own fanbelt broke in the middle of the desert. I liquidated my assets with a 300% profit.

 
Comment by implosion
2008-04-05 08:30:54

I hear you NYCBoy. You’d be surprised how many people I work with who think what they do is so important they couldn’t be laid off. Having been through the “Peace Dividend”, I always operate from the premise that I will be laid off if funding is bad. It’s just a job and PhDs are a dime a dozen.

 
Comment by spike66
2008-04-05 08:41:23

I run my own business, after years of working for corporate America, and I like it, but for the record, each of my clients is in a sense, my boss. I have to deliver for each of them. The upside is, there are clients I just won’t accept, because I don’t want these people in my life, and corporate life has given me the experience to spot them quickly. But even these you have to turn away gently–your business rep is too important to be blunt. That’s business, that’s life.

 
Comment by Fuzzy Bear
2008-04-05 08:50:27

That is capitalism. But I hear so many employees cry that it makes me sick.

Entitlement is the force behind those employees.

 
Comment by rms
2008-04-05 08:58:14

“Perhaps the biggest obstacle to people starting their own business, is cutting the umbilical cord, otherwise known as direct deposit of your paycheck.”

I’ve worked on both sides of the fence, and I prefer self employment, but out of control health insurance premiums are the obstacle if you’re raising a family and own any assets.

 
Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 09:04:40

there are clients I just won’t accept, because I don’t want these people in my life, Then they’re not your boss, they’re more like your prospective employees.

 
Comment by desertdweller
2008-04-05 10:53:24

Fuzzy Bear “Entitlement is the force behind those employees. ”

Got to look at this in its complex entirety.
When there are too darn many upper/mid/lower mgmnt that don’t have a frign clue how to be humane, and operate a business and make hugehuge huge $$$ mistakes and then REduce the non mgmnts pay just to make themselves get bonuses.
So, if they didn’t seem to constantly Ignore the suggestions of non mgmnt, or FRONT line employees at the cost to the company, then rightly so, I feel it is my right and responsibility to complain when I see them get bonuses for mismanagement.

Not everyone is perfect, but when you see costly mistakes and inhumanity time and time again, “Entitlement” isn’t the deal .

Still trying to make ends meet with my -35% reduction from 4 yrs ago and the INCrease of medical insurance with reduction of coverage and the cost of gas/cola increases.

 
 
Comment by jbunniii
2008-04-05 08:25:12

It’s also a wake-up call for those with high-income, high-expense lifestyles, employed in a volatile market (such as tech) that you are owned by your job unless you build adequate savings reserves.

Show me a tech worker who doesn’t save enough (and there are many, especially if they bought Silicon Valley houses and chose to reproduce), and I’ll show you someone who needs his employer, instead of the other way around. The latter being the correct order of the universe in my opinion.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by jbunniii
2008-04-05 08:18:51

What “breakthrough research” can possibly be happening at Yahoo, anyway?

If she’s any good, she should be able to find another job quickly. The tech job market doesn’t seem to have slowed very much. Yet.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 08:21:39

She was trying to make those dancing ads look more realistic?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by jbunniii
2008-04-05 08:41:06

Maybe she can get a job as a replacement for one of the many retiring aero-defense engineers? Not a bad salary. I don’t make much more and I’m about 25 years older. Severe salary compression for non-mgt in engineering/science.

I might be wrong, but “Parul Vora” doesn’t sound like the name of a native-born U.S. citizen, so the security clearance might be a show-stopper.

I used to work in aerospace in SoCal in the mid 1990s, and still have friends there, mostly in management now, who lament that they have many open requisitions but can’t fill them because of, what else, the insane cost of housing.

I would think that any engineer/scientist already IN California, hence already resigned to the cost of living (or fortunate/wise enough to have bought before the bubble), should be able to land a job in defense/aerospace without much difficulty. Whether they can hold on to that job after the inevitable spending cutbacks once Bush leaves office is another question altogether.

Regarding salary compression, it’s certainly real - the span of ages in my pay range at my company is at least 20 years - but consulting is a good lucrative alternative, as is starting your own business. I’ve done the former on and off, and hope to try the latter a few years down the line. Of course that option doesn’t exist for those who live paycheck to paycheck!

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-05 09:12:21

Why? Her parents might’ve emigrated from India.

You can’t possibly be this stupid.

I know plenty of people of Indian origin working for the CIA, DoD, etc. Mathematicians, mostly.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jbunniii
2008-04-05 10:21:34

Why? Her parents might’ve emigrated from India.

You can’t possibly be this stupid.

Most of the aerospace programs require SCI clearances, which are generally off-limits to anyone with foreign-born parents. But you’re not stupid, so you obviously know that.

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-04-05 09:26:21

This makes NO sense to me..what everybody who moves to SoCal MUST buy a house for the new job? I have never done that in my life and never will…..i mean what is wrong with renting in a new area when you get a new job?
————————————————–
I used to work in aerospace in SoCal in the mid 1990s, and still have friends there, mostly in management now, who lament that they have many open requisitions but can’t fill them because of, what else, the insane cost of housing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jbunniii
2008-04-05 10:28:46

This makes NO sense to me..what everybody who moves to SoCal MUST buy a house for the new job?

Well, if they are not fresh out of school and not living in California, they probably already own nice houses elsewhere in the country. It’s not easy to make a case that they would be better off moving to SoCal and living in an apartment (and likely paying more in rent than their mortgage costs them elsewhere). It’s not like Wall Street, where the jobs may easily pay 5-10x what they were making “back home,” thus making it worth while to put up with crappier housing conditions.

 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2008-04-05 08:57:02
 
Comment by Bloz
2008-04-05 11:17:22

> “It was a reminder that at the end of the day,

You’re even. The company owes you no more than what is specified in the employment contract.

What?!?! No contract?

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 07:03:49

test

Comment by Blano
2008-04-05 07:07:41

Ok, we’re on.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 07:11:14

Ben — I just sent you some quarterly funding monies as a token of appreciation for the hard work involved in keeping this blog up and running. I hope other regulars can find the means to do the same.

Comment by Muggy
2008-04-05 07:50:08

I have suggested before that we all pledge a portion of our “economic stimulus” funds, even if only $5-10

Comment by Olympiagal
2008-04-05 08:22:11

Good idea, muggy. So truly ‘a propos’.
And then Ben should take allllll that money and buy beer and then go on a rampage, standing in the street and shouting ‘I told ya! I TOLLLLLD YA!’, and ‘Bernanke is a butt-marching, simpering, dewey-eyed mumchancer! Scholar my bum!’ and ‘I love unicorns!’ and ‘Make Al Greenspan into a collapsible canteen!’ and ‘Eskimos are pretend!’ and things like that.
Is my thought.

Oh, blah, blah, you critics; Eskimos ARE pretend. Like the moon-landing. Have any of you ever met an Eskimo? Or landed on the moon? No?
Well–there you go, then.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by JP
2008-04-05 08:43:52

god, you crack me up.
Do you write? I mean, outside this blog?

 
Comment by NotInMontana
2008-04-05 09:13:25

Haha! Reminds me of when Chariot of the Gods was running on TV all the time. The bar manager where I worked said with all seriousness, it’s true - “I wouldn’t know how to build a pyramid - would you??” You see, it had to be aliens…LOL.

 
 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-05 08:22:41

I lurk a lot and I just sent mine in! I couldn’t get through my cofee in the mornings without it!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-05 08:23:49

“coffee” Darn sticking keys…:(

 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 08:31:49

“Darn sticking keys…:(”

What the hell do you do while reading this blog?

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-05 09:25:29

Same as you probably, monkey-boy. :-D

 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-05 09:31:04

Heheh - spill things…

 
 
 
Comment by SV guy
2008-04-05 08:55:44

Sent my money in last week.

Mike

Comment by waiting_in_la
2008-04-05 12:17:42

doh!

I tried the other day at worked, and I was having paypal difficulties. I owe you cash Ben, I will donate today.

Many of us owe this blog many x’s what we will contribute - that is for sure.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by tresho
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-05 07:45:59

The airlines are dropping like flies…

The 2 Hawaiian carriers (Aloha & ATM) shutting down in virtual tandem, were important, as it shows that Americans can’t afford long range domestic travel anymore.

 
Comment by Muggy
2008-04-05 07:54:15

I’d rather them go bankrupt first. Some airlines will probably keep going until their fleet starts falling from the sky.

 
Comment by Lane from s.c.
2008-04-05 08:26:30

Four airlines have shutdown this week. Champion, Aloha,ATA and skybus this morn. I just got a call this morning, my brother in law lost his job this as a pilot for skybus. It was a new start up with new planes. I don`t think he is too upset as he will probably start flying with the nascar airforce where he came from. They call it airforce because at a race the airport is overwhelmed with same jets and large too, Mr. Roush has two 727`s.

Lane

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 08:34:31

Having been through the Evernham hangar I can attest that those boys have some pretty nice toys. Everybody views NASCAR as a bunch of good old boys. The PTB of NASCAR are as elite as any other American corporation. He should do well.

Comment by Lane from s.c.
2008-04-05 09:27:26

Thanks. I hope. My sister is like me and most of the folks here, she knows how to manage money. You are very correct, I is big corp. america now. I was a fan in the 70`s as a young teen, but no more, too much like WWF, IMO. He used to fly for Dale Earnhart inc. and still has some connections in nascar. Those guys live a hard life and one I would not trade, even with their pay scale. Away from home every weekend.

Take care,
Lane

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by fries with that?
2008-04-05 07:12:41

Okay, it’s finally happened. The L.A. Times is reporting a drop in business for some cosmetic surgeons due to the poor real estate market:

http://tinyurl.com/528glc

After I finished the article (and got done gloating), I thought about what I would give up if things got tight. Will even the most financially sophisticated among us be able to escape fallout from the excesses of the past several years?

So, here goes: I’ll give up my landline phone, and desserts like cake, cookies, and ice cream. Dessert prices seem to be as out of control as gas prices.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-05 07:28:38

What boob would willingly inject botulism into their face and pay through the nose for the pleasure, anyway?

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 07:37:35

I guess this means we won’t see any more depressions in silicon valleys.

Comment by sd renter
2008-04-05 07:59:51

NYC Boy-It took me about 2 seconds to get this humor. Need my caffeine.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by jbunniii
2008-04-05 07:39:06

Only an ass.

 
Comment by Lionel
2008-04-05 15:01:16

What could go wrong with injecting a deadly neuro-toxin into your skull?

 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 07:40:01

“”I would rather have Botox than go out to dinner, but it’s just gotten so bad,” said Anthony, 41, who is looking for a job since her career in the mortgage business went sour. She has not had the facial treatments in months.”

I am guessing that she will be getting a different kind of facial treatments in her new job.

Comment by ACH
2008-04-05 08:02:08

ROTFLMAO!
So, $20 facials?
Roidy

 
Comment by implosion
2008-04-05 08:16:53

And it’s not only good, but good for you.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 08:23:10

Her hair has never been shinier.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by SV guy
2008-04-05 09:00:40

Funny sh*t!

Mike

 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2008-04-05 13:16:36

‘I am guessing that she will be getting…’

Cruel, but fair, lol.

 
Comment by tl
2008-04-05 14:48:12

BRILLIANT!

 
 
Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 08:23:10

I’ll know we’re in deep trouble when neurosurgeons are offering “The Works” for $1,250.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2008-04-05 08:53:23

So what can we give up? No trips this year as we recently finished paying the last bills for a daughter’s wedding. Bless her heart; she was really quite frugal.

We dine out less than once a week, usually at the local pizza or “family” place. Landline phone is under $30, each prepay cell phone is $16, our slow DSL is $20, cable around $55. I think that might be the first to go if we had to cut back. The number of commercials is disgusting and it’s hard to find something besides sports (tennis, golf, winter sports, football, college basketball) that’s worth watching.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-05 09:02:02

Most everything I like to do is unaffected by financial matters…

There is some inflation involved in taking a hike up into the mountains, countered by steady deflation on the way down.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 07:12:55

Are bailouts only for the big shots?
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 04/06/08

 
Comment by Carolina W
2008-04-05 07:13:13

Here is a dose of sanity for people living in reality:

http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data

Like pure, fresh water…

 
Comment by Professor Bear
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 07:42:47

This man might be the worst of the awful appendages of the Bu$h administration. He parrots Bu$h in that they take a stand against something and then go ahead and do it anyway. Chrome dome is scum, plain and simple and we are paying a huge price for ever having this loser rammed down our collective throats.

 
Comment by Chip
2008-04-05 08:00:42

So this must mean we’ve hit absolute rock bottom today and that the market will rally big on Monday. Right? Hank wouldn’t run a rabbit around the track in front of us, would he?

 
 
Comment by Hazard
2008-04-05 07:17:39

Someone has gotta tell Yahoo financial. They have an article that mood has changed on Wall St all for the better and good times are on the way.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 07:45:17

I agree. I’ve seen investment bankers playing hop scotch and 4-square on my block lately. Their joy is ringing out. WTF? Their bottom calling is so annoying.

 
Comment by Kim
2008-04-05 13:19:51

Well they’ve gotta keep it going for day or two longer so everyone can set up their short positions.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 07:17:47

Max and Chuck Show, Cont.
By Steven Pearlstein
Friday, April 4, 2008; Page D01

Hold on to your wallets, Mr. and Mrs. America, Max and Chuck are at it again.

Yes, our favorite sugar beet socialist and cornhusk communitarian have decided to ride to the rescue of the nation’s troubled housing sector.

It all started on Monday when members of the Senate returned to Washington after another two-week recess in which they apparently discovered that voters actually expected them to do something about the housing crisis rather than just talking about it until the next recess. So Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), the chairman and ranking member, respectively, of the Senate Finance Committee, took the opportunity to dust off a quartet of stinky tax breaks that had been rejected by the House and the Bush administration back in February, when Congress was scrambling to show that it was doing something about the gathering recession.

All this will do little to solve the housing crisis, but it may help to alleviate the campaign funding crisis created when these same tax provisions were jettisoned from the economic stimulus bill. The angry and ham-handed response from Brian Catalde, the president of the National Association of Home Builders, was to very publicly announce the indefinite cutoff of all contributions to federal candidates. Were those same provisions to be enacted now, it would be a stunning acknowledgement by members of Congress of the direct connection between political money and legislative outcomes.

Comment by SoBay
2008-04-05 07:31:55

‘All this will do little to solve the housing crisis’

- When the final ‘Housing Bailout’ bill is passed it will contain a lot of ‘Pork’ that will do little to solve the housing crisis.

Todays LA Times has an article on the drop in cosmetic surgery in Beverly Hills….Jane Sixpack is hurting. California will want aid included in the bailout to address this monstrous problem.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 07:19:14

Economy puts brakes on new home construction
01:27 PM CDT on Friday, April 4, 2008
By STEVE STOLER / WFAA-TV

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 07:20:02

Student Loan Debt Prices Tumble, Lenders Stop Extending Credit
By Sarah Mulholland

April 4 (Bloomberg) — Bonds backed by student loans are losing value for the first time since at least 1999 as investors flee the debt on concern defaults may rise as the economy enters a recession.

Comment by not a gator
2008-04-05 07:43:43

Now, if tuition would only fall.

These goons are full of it. US educational system was the best in the world. Was.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-05 09:39:15

The higher educational system still is. I doubt anything has changed in the last few years but yes, the competition is trying to catch up.

Still, you don’t catch up to a century’s worth of headstart overnight.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 11:19:23

The competition sends its kids to U.S. to get their higher educations. Once enough human capital is obtained at top U.S. grad schools, we will not be needed. The outcome need not be that dire, though, as many academics from abroad decide to stick around instead of returning to their home countries.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-05 12:18:50

A different way of looking at it is that the US imports scientists and engineers because it doesn’t produce enough. It doesn’t produce enough because only a moron would work for such meagre rewards but the Chindians have no problem doing so.

Na-rrrr-sty but accurate.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Joe
2008-04-05 07:50:26

This is justice for students. “Dubya” and crew had the opportunity to make direct lending from the Dept of Ed to students via their University the exclusive way for federal loan programs. An arrangement that results in much lower fee load to students, putting more dollars against tuition and other educational costs. Dubya’s big banking buddies did not like that at all and blocked it. The bill was proposed as an outgrowth of New York Attorney General’s successful suit against universities that steered students to preferred lenders where the University got kickbacks funded by the higher fees banks got for the loans. Well, looks like the market forces unleashed by big banks’ loose lending and scared investors are now running away from these loans and students will only have direct lending as the way to obtain such loans. JUSTICE!! SWEET IRONIC JUSTICE

Comment by Wee Willy
2008-04-05 09:27:48

In Ontario, if the default rate on student loans for a particular college exceeds 30%, then no more student loans will be granted to students attending that collge. When this rule was introduced all the borderline private colleges closed up.

 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 07:53:43

The sad truth is that we are sending way too many kids to college. But the boneheads of the ownership society look upon that as a great accomplishment. Some kids have no business setting foot into a 4-year college. Meantime we are completely lacking in the skilled trades. Maybe I’m just biased because I don’t have one of those college degree thingies.

Comment by ACH
2008-04-05 08:07:38

I went to electronics school for 2 years after my military service. I made a good living and was very successful. I decided to attend college in the late 80’s because I wanted to. I agree. There are a number of kids that should not attend college, the money will be wasted, and their jobs will not begin to satisfy them. Yes, I think people should have jobs that they are interested in and are of value to them. I have.
Roidy

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-04-05 08:53:06

‘Maybe I’m just biased because I don’t have one of those college degree thingies.’

That’s probably it, NYCityboy. Why, my degree has been of simply inestimable value to me. Nearly every single day I am called upon to identify whether a painting is a Klee or a Pollack, and to discuss oil-painting technique, and to reveal the small but crucial difference between ‘collage’ and ‘montage’.

Seriously, though, college was wonderful. Just wonderful. I got a scholarship, and if I hadn’t, I couldn’t have gone, even working all the part-time jobs. I simply wouldn’t have gone. The End.
I’d probably be sitting on a wooden bench in remote southern Utah right now, next to my sister-wives, in a sunbonnet, shoeless, listening to the local incarnation of Joseph Smith the Profit telling me to obey my husband completely or else risk Eternal Damnation, with the local elders furtively eyeing my 11 year old daughter and making plans.
(The sad thing is, I’m not joking, either)

College is, or should be, for more than getting a degree so you can make money or say you have a degree. In my case, college saved me, set me free.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 09:06:49

And you would be one of those people that should go to college. Notice that I didn’t say nobody should go to college. I think a college degree can be a huge help. I just pi$$ed around enough not to get one. I may get one some day but I might not. The, “everybody must go to college” attitude that is so prevalent is a real waste of resources.

I’m glad you are not the focus of a Big Love episode.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-04-05 13:02:18

Olygal’s not kidding - today’s Salt Lake Tribune (www.sltrib.com):

Update: Judge orders all children out of FLDS compound
Posted: 8:32 AM- Early Saturday, two shuttle vans left the First Baptist Church in Eldorado, where many of the girls from the FLDS ranch were taken Friday. Full Story

Texas police take 52 girls from FLDS compound, put 18 in state custody as they probe an allegation of underage marriage

 
 
Comment by spike66
2008-04-05 09:19:53

Olygal as usual is right. I loved college too…3 meals a day and all the books you could read. I have a Ivy B.A. in history, which does not translate into vocational training. But it has enriched my life every day. But, finding a job, navigating corporate America or starting your own business–these are things you teach yourself.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-05 09:38:03

I’ve got dual Microbio and International Relations degrees and every time I get hired, all my prospective employers ever ask is “what did you do in the Air Force (I’m retired)?”… Go figure

 
Comment by Jean S
2008-04-05 09:43:33

spike, my husband graduated from Rutgers with a BA and MA in history. When he started interviewing in the corporate world, MBAs were all the rage. Some arrogant jackass looked at his resume and said “history?! why the hell would I hire anyone with a degree in history?” My husband replied, “I can read, write, and think. You need anyone with those skills?”

 
 
Comment by Jean S
2008-04-05 09:40:08

thank you for this reminder of what education can be…much, much more than targeted technical/vocational training.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 13:47:21

You don’t hail from Hildale, do you?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ahansen
2008-04-05 20:47:00

Very Dear Olympiagal. Having survived the Hell that must have been your childhood with your sense of the absurd intact, your reward is that you can and do share all your truly wonderful literary snippets with (at the very least,) an appreciative blog audience. We are honored. Thank you!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by jane
2008-04-06 02:22:58

I am a tad late to the party, but here’s my $.02 anyway. So There.

For folks who value thinking clearly, a higher education at a tough school is beyond price, for which you should be willing to sell your soul. It is not supposed to be trade school or vocational training. Recruiters only go to the rigorous schools anyway, with good reason, so a commodity college education will not “get you a job”.

But an education at a rigorous school is essential to develop clear thinking. Go to Colorado State, Eastern Missouri State or Western Connecticut State University, or some such, and all bets are off. These schools - I know for a fact - rely heavily on multiple choice tests. Not much value added beyond what the hapless students got from the education lobby thugs posing as teachers in their public high schools.

On the value of clear thinking. Try cobbling together a coherent briefing on ANY subject if your preparation is a 12th grade public school education. It can’t be done.

I agree that there are far too many mediocre schools, serving hordes of mediocre students. They are also a scam for foreign students, whose student visas are an easier route to illegal immigration than parajumping from an Air India / Pakistan airliner. A critical mass of mediocre students maintains/ed a profit center for the student loan industry, and provides classroom hours for PH.Ds unable to compete for jobs in places where they need to develop a reputation. “Publish or perish” is anathema to these folk. Peer review means you have to be willing to have your ideas analyzed and evaluated in closed session, by a bunch of folks with global networks who have run the same gauntlet and passed.

Those who don’t value thinking clearly above all else do not belong in college. Personally, I think far too many native born kids are forced into it. Consequently, the trades have lost their stature as honorable professions. This has greatly diminished our society - the bulk of the people in our workforce are made to feel that they don’t measure up to The Plastic Standard. The college educated look down on the trades, for the most part, and are repaid in kind at the moment of truth.

The Europeans have a good system, although it is loudly decried in this country. Bottom line - nobody goes to college who doesn’t belong there and want to be there, there are far fewer mediocre colleges, college graduates actually get jobs because there are fewer of them, and the trades are respected. What’s wrong with that picture?

Kudos to the Canadians for putting mediocre colleges out of business.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by rms
2008-04-05 09:16:03

“Maybe I’m just biased because I don’t have one of those college degree thingies.”

You’d see the world differently with an engineering degree.

 
Comment by Charliegator in Gainesville, Florida
2008-04-05 09:38:24

As a volunteer with a local fraternity, I can tell you that at least half of these young men are lost and confused. They are only here because their parents have forced them to attend college. Their maturity level is also very strange. At times I think I’m dealing with tenth graders.

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-05 09:55:43

My Wife is a senior community college administrator and she literally has had to deal with death threats from disgruntled “children”, yank students out of her classrooms due to disruptive behavior, and chase down gun wielding thugs while in performance of her duties as the head of her campus. Simply unreal.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by max4me
2008-04-05 11:39:31

Yes because people dont understand the world has changed. If you dont have a degree your looked down on, If you do get a degree you have crushing dept.

Also parrents dont let childern fail or handle theur own affairs, why do you think doctor phil was calling britney an “adult child”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Lionel
2008-04-05 11:48:58

“Their maturity level is also very strange. At times I think I’m dealing with tenth graders.”

I recently moved my family to a new house, partly because I tired of living next to a house loaded with University of Washington girls. Outside of the 4AM parties, the final straw was when a pitbull escaped from their house and ran through my yard, growling at my wife. When we confronted the girl who took care of the dog, her response was at the maturity level of a little girl. In a near-stream-of-consciousness blather, she whined that her football playing boyfriend made her take care of it, because he was always on the road with the team, and her roommates didn’t actually like living with a pit, and on and on. I just stared at her, dumbfounded. She’s graduating soon, and she’s a complete imbecile. I told her I didn’t care why she had the dog; I didn’t want it eating my daughter. They got rid of the dog, but I decided to get the hell away from them.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-04-05 10:53:08

NYCboy:

I agree fully, trades and working with your hands is not very valued anymore, I feel lucky my father was a bricklayer, and an old school guy who could build things, with the DeWalt big saw in the basement, lots of tools too, so we as kids learned an awful lot about fixing repairing, building and general upkeep on a house, and about rental properties.

These kids today are so clueless about hands on stuff…..but i remember when women were complaining about not being paid the same as men, I used to say well do you know how to fix a TV set? Companies 20 years ago were begging for women who had technical fix it skills…they would create jobs for them if one walked in and asked. And when was the last time you saw a woman auto mechanic?

Jobs that don’t require a college degree but some smarts and a desire to get a little dirty, or work odd hours and conditions.

I hope we could close at least 1/3 of the 4 year colleges in America, we just don’t need that many, we are outsourcing as many jobs that require being smart as we can. And invest the money in local community schools, job training, and adult ed.

Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-04-05 12:30:18

My 19 year old niece is a very small gal, must weigh all of 100 lbs. She’s a certified welder and makes good money, loves it. Dropped out of high school cause it was boring and went to VoTech school. She’s also taking courses at the local college to be a teacher someday.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Joe
2008-04-05 13:42:25

Agreed: We have a need in the trades that is not being met. The trades are a way to make a fair wage for a necessary service/product. On the flip side education today is not the guarantee it use to be in terms of getting a good paying job. Many people are gettng degrees in nothing that is preparing them for nothing. Conversely we are not producing enough engineers and scientists. However I am not totally down on education, as I have three of those degree thingies, I’m proud of them and they have produced a good paying job for me, but its in science and not in financial alchemy!!

 
 
Comment by Jwhite
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 07:25:49

I can guess the way this fellow’s bets are hedged. As posters here might guess, I suspect gold and other PMs may be more overvalued at this point than l-t T-bonds (= future payments in $US), as everyone “knows” the dollar is “worthless” and is running into PMs for a “safe haven” play. Time will tell all…

RPT-UPDATE 1-PIMCO’S Gross-Treasuries are most overvalued assets
Fri Apr 4, 2008 2:55pm EDT


“I think Treasuries are the most overvalued asset in the world, bar none,” Gross said.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-05 07:42:37

Those flocking to T-Bills are all birds of a feather, that think there’s safety in numbers…

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 07:58:37

Same could be said for those going for the gold. Just check out that volume tsunami (though it admittedly appears to have crested already).

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-05 08:17:43

One instrument places complete utter financial faith in our government, the other doesn’t.

Choose a side.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 11:08:12

I don’t choose sides, I merely comment on what I see and read. I will not cheerlead for your pet asset class nor for anyone else’s — neither my job nor my interest, and dilutes the strength of this job as an objective source of information.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 11:40:10

“this job blog as an”

Freudian slip showing…

 
Comment by kerk93
2008-04-05 12:05:30

Being objective is a fallacy. It implies that somehow the objectivist is devoid of any value system. Assuming we are all human, perhaps a faulty assumption, that just isn’t possible. It violates the laws of human nature.

If you are claiming that you have a job of being “an objective source of information,” may I recommend starting with a rephrasing. Perhaps “being as objective as humanly possible” would be an appropriate beginning, and lend more credence to your supposition.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 13:50:34

I am trying to be as objective as is humanly possible, then — always happy to go with a better word choice (which you offered)…I am often in a hurry and posting with kids fighting in the background, so please bear with my seat-of-the-pants stylisms.

 
Comment by desertdweller
2008-04-05 14:05:57

LOL kerk.

may I recommend starting with a rephrasing. Perhaps “being as objective as humanly possible” would be an appropriate beginning, and lend more credence to your supposition.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-05 14:20:38

Profess:

There’s not much upside to being a fly in the ointment when all you get is sticky.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 15:13:30

Happy to play the (gad)fly when irrational exuberance creeps in to the thinking of posters here…

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-05 15:22:31

Shostakovich of living…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDxZ0c3tujI

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 18:10:19

“…of living…”

I would figure out a way to get into a professional orchestra if I were guaranteed such a winsome stand partner.

 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 08:28:37

Disclosure time, Stucco. Do you own any PMs? I’m just curious. You are probably the most anti-PM on this blog and Alad is probably the most pro-PM on this blog.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 11:44:50

I will not disclose my current asset allocation, but will say that I have owned PMs in the past and have no reason to not do so now or later if it makes sense for me.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 11:46:28

Also, I will accept the charge of being anti-bubble, but not anti-PM. I was pointing out that housing was in a bubble alongside of Ben back in 2005 when there were few posters on this blog.

 
 
Comment by silvertoad
2008-04-05 15:56:51

the volume increase in that chart illustrates nothing more than the june contract becoming actively traded one on the comex. as a pm bull myself i am heartened by such skepticism — time to worry is when everyone believes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 07:58:20

Gross is an overvalued asset, for sure.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 07:59:43

Funny how BB called Gross in for a tutorial last summer, and now Gross is biting Uncle Buck.

Comment by Hoz
2008-04-05 08:04:41

BB did not listen to Mr. Gross. IMHO, Mr. Bill Gross is one of the few sane voices.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 07:26:50
Comment by Chip
2008-04-05 08:26:27

Are these bonds no longer callable? If they are, then the pain can be pretty short-lived. Unless I’m missing something, the issuers will be able to re-fund them once muni insurance stabilizes, which ought to be within the next couple of years, I’d think.

 
 
Comment by kckid
2008-04-05 07:32:54

Plan would double state income tax for high earners

Smith said his proposed constitutional amendment targets the state’s highest earners — about 107,000 of Illinois’ 5.6 million taxpayers. Their individual state income tax rate would rise to 6 percent, up from the present flat rate of 3 percent. People earning less would continue to pay 3 percent.
The higher rate would generate about $3 billion in new revenue, Smith said. The money would be divided roughly equally into three pieces: for education, for infrastructure and for tax relief for people earning less than $250,000.

http://www.sj-r.com/News/stories/28056.asp

 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2008-04-05 07:34:14

Many states facing huge budget shortfalls - 10% and more not uncommon. MA, CA, NJ, NY, and AZ among biggest disasters:

rhttp://online.barrons.com/article/SB120735034099291201.html?mod=djemWR

Theoretically, budget shortfalls should be a lagging economic indicator. Therefore, expect things to get worse, much worse. I foresee states like MA eventually issuing their own scrip for certain transfer payments, which in turn can only be redeemed at state-owned or sanctioned stores/services. Eventually state workers will have to take a certain percentage of their pay in scrip. And forget pensions - they’ll stop funding them, then start raiding them.

Landlocked northwest and Middle West of this country will enjoy a relative heyday - it’ll be the late 19th century all over again.

Comment by exeter
2008-04-05 07:57:28

This is what happens when the tax cut mantra takes precedence over funding essential public services.

Comment by kckid
2008-04-05 08:34:33

There Will Be Hunger In Argentina

It may sound like common sense to us, but we aren’t Argentina’s irrational new president, Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, who suddenly hiked taxes to 44% on soy and sunflower exports just as crops were about to be harvested. It was the third tax hike on farmers in six months, but she denounced Argentine farmers’ protests as the acts of “coup plotters” in a “protest of plenty.”

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=292027669580278&kw=argentina

 
 
Comment by kckid
2008-04-05 08:13:46

Illinois pension systems severely underfunded
A new state report says the nation’s most under-funded state pension system continues to gobble up a bigger chunk of state resources, leaving less cash for other state programs.

In its annual review of the state’s five pension systems, auditors put the state’s unfunded pension liability at $40.7 billion.

http://www.pantagraph.com/articles/2007/03/28/news/124738.txt

Wow! $40bil unfunded 13mil residents = over $3,000 per resident.

Comment by denquiry
2008-04-05 09:22:46

stock bubble, housing bubble, commodities bubble, and commminnggg next……public/private pension underfunding becomes public knowledge.

 
 
Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 08:19:46

Landlocked northwest and Middle West of this country will enjoy a relative heyday Why?

 
Comment by Chip
2008-04-05 08:28:15

I notice they never call it “Spending overshoots.”

 
 
Comment by exeter
2008-04-05 07:36:57

Holy smokin’ a$$holes…..Just when I thought I’ve heard it all. The mental midgets of FoxNoise is suggesting that tractor-trailer drivers who choose not to roll as a means to take a stand on fuel prices should face charges. WTF?!!!! Charge them with what???!! The only charges that need to be filed are against that networks management should be for sedition, subversion and crimes against logic.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-05 07:48:58

Perhaps ’ssshrubery wants to make a reagan-ish stand against ground traffic controllers?

 
Comment by Paul in Jax
2008-04-05 07:50:28

Uh, disrupting traffic, perhaps? One sure way to get ‘em rolling again would be for you to take your diatribe and a megaphone and go shout out your complaints at the local truck stop.

 
Comment by vmaxer
2008-04-05 07:51:25

Perhaps the tax breaks being given to the homebuilders, should go to the truckers instead. Fuel prices have made it pointless for these guys to even start their rigs. I think the truckers should get preference to homebuilders. We can do without a few homebuilders, we can’t do without the truckers.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 08:42:27

Or maybe neither one gets the tax break. If the price for running the trucks goes up then inflation goes up. The price of daily goods go up. That brings down demand and prices come back down. Am I missing something or are we once again using one wrong to justify another wrong?

There is going to be a lot of pain before this mess is over. We must realize that and quit trying to think like our government that everything can be gerry-rigged to keep the pain from coming.

 
 
Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 08:04:41

If the marginal, barely-able-to-keep-going truckers want to afford their fuel, they can raise their charges to their customers. Customers who don’t want to pay the charges are always free to contract with other transport, it’s not like there is a shortage of trucking capacity in the US.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2008-04-05 08:58:56

Um, if truckers aren’t getting paid enough it means there’s an oversupply of truckers. Simple supply and demand.

Comment by exeter
2008-04-05 09:08:39

Ummm… I say they should all sit idle for a week and then come back and tell me another great idea…. umm.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2008-04-05 09:57:45

There seems to be a basic lack of understanding of economics here.

Imagine if there were only 100 truckers to serve the entire U.S. What would their revenue be? Now imagine there was one trucker for every 10 people in the U.S. How many of them would make nothing at all?

No, about 10% of the truckers should sit idle indefinitely. The rest would have sufficient loads at sufficient rates to make a profit. In a contraction, everyone hurts until the most marginal businesses go belly up.

 
Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 10:26:38

There seems to be a basic lack of understanding of economics here. You can say that again. The basic tools of trucking are a CDL and a truck, lots & lots of competition at that level. This is not to say trucking isn’t an essential part of the economy, just that they can pass their costs on to their customers, or not.

 
Comment by peter m
2008-04-05 10:37:36

“No, about 10% of the truckers should sit idle indefinitely. The rest would have sufficient loads at sufficient rates to make a profit. In a contraction, everyone hurts until the most marginal businesses go belly up.”

That would hurt companies which need just-in-time delivery of vital componets. Trucking is very oriented to meeting tight logistical demand delivery schedules of their client companies. Client A needs that part at this time and date, and fast. That means keeping sufficient amt of trucks available to meet this just-in- time delivery demands of clients. Removing 10 % of truckers from the nationwide stock would result in delayed delivery of vital machine components, aero- parts, auto parts, ect. needed ASAP. Companies do not like to keep much unneeded inventory stocked on their shelves and prefer just-in-time delivery of needed parts and supplies.

In a severe contracting economy maybe their might be an oversupply of truckers, but then their delivery clients reduce their inventories as well ,and the remaining surviving truckers will have to drive harder & faster to meet those tight delivery timetables, and that would result in more stress and road/hwy accidents.

 
Comment by exeter
2008-04-05 10:48:50

There seems to be a basic lack of elementary level reading skills here. The topic is precisely about a hare brained, illogical idea floated by a ideologically flawed “news” outfit that truck drivers should be charged with some type of crime for parking their rigs as a means to express their contempt for the system and disatisfaction with fuel costs. Now a question for the apologists; What is the basis of your animosity and hostility toward truck drivers and other working class people???

 
Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 11:00:53

There seems to be a basic lack of elementary level reading skills here. Nope, everyone seems to be reading this very clearly, and choosing their responses carefully. A fisherman who doesn’t get a nibble needn’t blame the fish.

 
Comment by desertdweller
2008-04-05 11:01:36

Exeter, I agree, what is the animosity on this site against working class people?
I see an ‘elitism’ posted often.
And truck drivers, if they were paid so darn much, EVERYONE would be driving trucks.

Another ‘elitism’ that is floated often here is that “the poor won’t get educated to improve their conditions/jobs” .
I find that apalling on so many levels. Not everyone was or is a rocket scientist. Not everyone is or wants to be over educated. You can SEE how that has turned out with all the MBAs that are ruining our corps and America.
Exeter, I agree with your
“Now a question for the apologists; What is the basis of your animosity and hostility toward truck drivers and other working class people??? “

 
Comment by exeter
2008-04-05 11:06:16

Everyone? Got a frog in your pocket?

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-05 18:24:04

Delayed delivery? Buy them earlier. Rent warehouse space. Everything has costs. Some managers get bonuses for reducing costs while raising risk. Some eventually get caught out.

 
Comment by foreclose_me
2008-04-05 23:24:24

That is an interesting connection: Rising fuel costs means just-in-time inventory management is too costly, because it requires lots of trucks running around half-full.

 
Comment by MaryLee
2008-04-05 23:30:39

The GaveKal model is going to get quite a work-out over the next four years. Just-in-time has numerous advantages, all tailored to the mythical ever-growing demand side. Now we’ll see what happens when demand becomes a wholly different kind of moving target.

 
 
Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 09:09:29

That’s what I was saying. This meme of truckers unjustly overwhelmed by fuel costs appears every time diesel spikes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by peter m
2008-04-05 09:48:45

“Um, if truckers aren’t getting paid enough it means there’s an oversupply of truckers. Simple supply and demand.”

Actually there is alway a demand for truckers. I work in the transport industry and am near the LB/ LA ports where i see 1000’s of trucks whizzing by daily going to and from the port. Every sign on back of the truck always advertises for class A drivers. TSA, Fed, State transportation rules, regulations,stiff requirememts for maintaining that class A/B eliminates quite a few drivers . One accident or citation and you are finished. Class A is so taxing and physically draining an occupation that many truckers burn out or drop out /take time due due to stress. That keeps the supply of available class A truckers in check.

Average pay for truckers is $30,000-$40,000 /year for beginners. More experienced or expert truckers who hustle their ass off can make much more . Trucking depends on No of jobs u can do : the more jobs u get or hustle for the more money U make.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by peter m
2008-04-05 10:07:13

“Um, if truckers aren’t getting paid enough it means there’s an oversupply of truckers. Simple supply and demand”

Thre is no shortage of applicants and those eager to get into trucking. The problem is that stiff requirements for qualifying to drive a class A rig ferrets out quite a few.
The medical requirements, TSA rules, too many points on 10-year DMV/MCR reports , A single 2-point citation, and background checks alone eliminate 60% of all first time applicants.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 10:38:18

My best friend’s a trucker. Many trucking companies treat their drivers like dirt. There is no shortage of drivers eager to get out of trucking — why do you think all the big companies are constantlly advertising for drivers? Many drivers don’t get home for weeks at a time. How many could live on truckstop cuisine for 3 weeks straight?
One accident … and you’re finished. Not at all true in the sense I think you meant. Last year my friend found himself facing a loose trailer coming at him at 65 mph on a 2-lane road. The oncoming lane was full of cars & smaller trucks. He could have crossed into the oncoming lane & taken out the oncoming traffic to save his own skin, but he didn’t, just went as close to the center line as he could, the trailer clipped his right fender & went off the road. A very close call. He would have given up his own life to avoid taking others, but that wasn’t necessary. He was off work 2 weeks while his truck was repaired, and he wasn’t paid for that time. At least his company doesn’t force him to drive into CA or the entire NE US, which he says are the worst places for trucking. No wonder all the ads around Long Beach.

 
Comment by exeter
2008-04-05 10:58:18

Hauling for Schneider is hardly OTR trucking and real drivers AKA Teamsters don’t get treated like dirt. Back to the topic….. How do the mental midgets at FoxNoise figure owner/operators can or ought to be charged with a crime for idling? Where is your pro-small business spirit???

 
Comment by peter m
2008-04-05 11:13:12

“At least his company doesn’t force him to drive into CA or the entire NE US, which he says are the worst places for trucking. No wonder all the ads around Long Beach”

Agree, Truck driving in greater LA metro region(regional carriers) is the worst place for truckers. The amt of traffic, the tie-ups, the constant sig-alerts, sitting in stuck traffic half the day in hot smoggy weather, meeting insane delivery schedules, these make regional driving in LA a logistical nightmare for truckers.

The problem with having an accident on your MCR record is that insurance carriers will longer insure that driver, thus causing the fleet manager to drop him. It is the commercial insurance requirements which cause drivers to drop out. In the case of i/c’s it not a problem, they just have to pay triple costs for their CDL commercial insurance but if u are a W-2 trucker using a company truck one major citation or accident will finish U.

 
 
Comment by desertdweller
2008-04-05 10:56:15

“OVerpaid” I doubt it. Remember George has allowed Mexico truck drivers to drive past the border.. Hence different much lower pay.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by exeter
2008-04-05 11:08:12

But desertdweller… tresho said everyone disagrees with you… and me…. and nycboy and pete, and denquiry…. and…

 
 
 
Comment by Kid Clu
2008-04-05 09:02:20

“Customers who don’t want to pay the charges are always free to contract with other transport”.

Sadly, I am afraid the truckers that corporations will contract with will be the Mexicans. Thanks to our Preznut, they can now be unleashed to cause mayhem on our roadways. And corporations to not care about lives lost in traffic accidents, if they can save a dime on transport, and increase those quarrtly earnings.

 
Comment by peter m
2008-04-05 09:05:40

” the marginal, barely-able-to-keep-going truckers want to afford their fuel, they can raise their charges to their customers. Customers who don’t want to pay the charges are always free to contract with other transport, it’s not like there is a shortage of trucking capacity in the US.”

There is a point beyond which customers are unwilling to pay for excessive fuel surcharges. They will attempt to find cheaper carriers but then it become a catch -22. Carriers will try to keep rates they charge as reasonable as possible without losing the client, even if they swallow the rising fuel costs.
Often this results in the I/C’s or W-2 salaried truckers not getting sufficient fuel surcharge compensation for driving their rigs. The W-2 salaried truckers working for the realy big giant trucking firms such as Schneider/Dynamex/UPS/Walmart are a bit better off as their companies are more easily able to absorb rising fuel costs and better able to negotiate long-term rates with client companies to handle rising fuel costs.

The ultimate solution is to simply pass on the costs to the end use consumer of the shipped products, you and me , but then demand falls off as consumers & end users of shipped products which end up on store shelves simply will not pay excessive prices for products, due to rising fuel costs.

The rising costs of fuel for goods transport has a boomerrang effect which feeds inflation ,and results in falling demand for consumer products and presto, another recession feeder.

Comment by pete a
2008-04-05 10:02:49

I have done work for the USPS every penny rise in fuel=$19,000,000. Stamps are going up.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 10:55:45

There is a point beyond which customers are unwilling to pay for excessive fuel surcharges. And are those customers going to stop shipping their goods? I doubt it. They will attempt to find cheaper carriers Sure, who wouldn’t. But the shipper must be paid at some level. There are no free lunches and no free shipping.
Stamps are going up. Yes, and the higher they go the less mail there will be. To combat this, be sure to return every single prepaid business envelope back to the original junk mailer, whether or not you put anything in the envelope, to support the US Postal Service’s every shrinking business and to harass the junk mailers.
W-2 salaried truckers not getting sufficient fuel surcharge compensation for driving their rigs My trucker friend is employed by a small midwestern carrier, and pays absolutely nothing for the fuel he burns. The truck itself is modified with a engine governor and an auxiliary power unit to save on fuel, all of which was paid for by his employer. He even gets a bonus when his truck gets fractionally better mileage, due to his driving skill and use of aux power.
Of course the solution is to increase the price of transport along with the price of fuel. Inflation is an economist’s term which is not synonymous with higher prices. When consumer goods get too expensive to consumers, they’ll buy less. Not even the government can conjure up diesel for 30 cents/gallon a la 1973.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 08:39:05

Hey exeter, don’t miss that mad real estate rush that is coming in September of this year. You will miss out.

Who was that worthless looking troll that was spewing that noise? At least Adam Lyshinsky had the smarts to tell the troll that there wouldn’t be another overheated housing boom until Chelsea Clinton is ready to run for president.

Comment by exeter
2008-04-05 09:03:22

“Who was that worthless looking troll that was spewing that noise?”

It was Bureau Liar Chief Neil Cavuto. Even more sad was John “I’m not a transvestite” Rutledge was caught reading off a script, take after take. I can only shake my head in disbelief or laugh.

 
 
Comment by denquiry
2008-04-05 09:26:21

WTF. I thought faux news was all about the free market. they want to regulate the truckers but not the hedge funds/derivatives crowd. Go figure.

 
 
Comment by Leighsong
2008-04-05 07:46:47

Oh bother. Zillow opens online mortgage marketplace - and it’s free.

http://tinyurl.com/5njt5f

Sigh,
Leigh

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 07:56:01

Bad case of shopper’s fear sets in

Consumer anxiety forcing many to cut back, make do
By Anne D’Innocenzio
ASSOCIATED PRESS
April 5, 2008

The gloomiest outlook for the economy in 35 years may be forcing Americans to live with what they have and to save up for what they want.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-05 08:02:01

One aspect of the Great Depression that will be similar, was there were consumers goods a’plenty in the early 1930’s, but nobody had any dough.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-05 09:44:24

Well, it’s for the same reason too.

A credit boom sets off investment in the most unreasonable industries. Capacity is built up for no particular good reason, and when the SHTF (which it always does), all of this excess capacity has nowhere to go. Even in goods that are useful or necessary, there is serious pressure on margins from the excess capacity.

So it’s similar to the GD because it’s a systematic pattern not just because of an arbitrary observation.

 
Comment by combotechie
2008-04-05 09:53:50

“… but nobody had any dough.”

But those few who had the dough dictated prices to those who didn’t.
Cash was king then, cash is king now.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-05 09:57:56

The Dollar didn’t plummet 60% in value from 1929 to 1933 against other stronger currencies, as it has in recent years.

wake up…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by combotechie
2008-04-05 10:20:59

In recent years credit standards were loosened to the point of non-existance which led to enormous volumes of thin-air money creation.

The past few months have presented to us the tightening of lending standards and thus the disappearance of this thin-air money.

The easy money days are gone, the hard money days have arrived.

Cash is king.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-05 10:22:55

Color Copiers

 
 
 
 
Comment by Fuzzy Bear
2008-04-05 10:01:22

The gloomiest outlook for the economy in 35 years may be forcing Americans to live with what they have and to save up for what they want.

Forcing Americans to live within their means and not keep up with the Jones? Lets see how long that will last once the credit markets and housing bubble corrects and begins an upward swing. I think the consumer will go right back to living beyond their means in due time. History has a way of repeating itself in different variations over many decades.

In order for Americans to change their ways, corporate America and the senior management along with the members of congress, the house and the president and all political leaders must lead by example.

By example I suggest senior management lead by setting excellent ethical ways of conducting business. Weed out those who manage by fear and intimidation which often is a cover up for unethical and often illegal conduct. Set the example of building high quality products that the consumer will want to buy and recommend to their friends. Advertise their products or services sold by setting the example of truthful messages to the public about the product or services sold. Stay away from methods of advertising by twisting data that is unreliable such as the NAR who advertises that property values on average double every ten years. Sooner or later the consumer will find out the truth and in the long run, it will hurt the image of the corporation and performance. Focus on long term results and not the short term high presure returns that often breed the cooking of the books in order to please wall street. Do away with multi-million dollar comp plans for the senior management. Bring back a plan that includes a salary along with a comp plan that awards all employees evenly based on salary, profitability of the company, excellent ethics, etc. under the direction of each senior manager.

It’s time to change to the positive and ethical ways of setting example Washington and corporate America!

 
 
Comment by ACH
2008-04-05 07:57:28

Well, here is an interesting item.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89338743

It is an explanation of the derivatives market, the effect on the economy, and some possible consequences. Realize that I fundamentally believe that “if something can happen it will.” So, this is inline with my current thinking.

BTW, when you listen to this - it is rather long- keep in mind that our economy is no longer focussed on the future and derivatives are a symptom of our disease. The disease? Gambling. Gee, I’d rather we all become alcoholics. That problem is easier to diagnose and even treat.
Roidy

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-05 09:07:48

Thanks for sharing that…

Very nicely sums up our situation~

 
 
Comment by Hoz
2008-04-05 08:01:27

This is courtesy of Naked Capitalism:
1991 testimony regarding the S&L collapse along with the printed testimony.

“…High on bankers’ list of wants is the dismantling of the Glass- Steagall Act, which was passed in 1933 because many of the bank failures following the market crash in 1929 were caused by risky transactions conducted between banks and their securities affiliates. The Glass-Steagall Act removed banks from Wall street and, to entice a gun shy public back to banks, it created federal deposit insurance. (Bankers today want only one of these Glass-Steagall provisions retained .These would-be speculators still want deposit insurance. Free enterprise and level playing fields is one thing, but removing their federally-backed insurance safety net is quite another.)

If Congress again opens up banking to Wall Street speculation, as it opened up S&Ls and banks to real estate speculation, regulators will quickly lose control over the complex series of events that a pervasive marketplace will immediately set in motion. Insider abuse, self-dealing, and back scratching relationships between institutions will run rampant….”
Salon
http://tinyurl.com/68tkgh
and
http://www.newsforreal.com/
and
http://www.newsforreal.com/written.html

This is just the beginning.

 
Comment by not a gator
2008-04-05 08:07:18

(posting article not link because every time I post with a link it gets binned)

Florida lender cuts Hub offices

Sixty jobs axed at mortgage co.

By Jerry Kronenberg
Saturday, April 5, 2008 - Added 13h ago

Small-business mortgage lender Bayview Financial is closing or scaling back its two Hub offices as part of a nationwide downsizing, eliminating some 60 local jobs.

Florida-based Bayview’s InterBay Funding division laid off about half of roughly 100 staffers at its Mansfield sales and processing office. Bayview’s Silver Hill Financial unit also closed a Norwood sales site, cutting some 10 additional jobs.

“The adverse economic climate in the real estate industry (is) expected to result in a significant reduction in loan volume and necessitate a commensurate reduction in staffing,” Bayview said in disclosing roughly 500 layoffs among its 2,200-person work force.

Bayview specializes in $100,000 to $1.5 million mortgages for restaurants, gas stations and other businesses that traditional banks often consider too small to lend to.

The Florida firm also had a reputation for writing high-risk, high-interest mortgages, such as loans requiring only 10 percent down.

“They were definitely the ‘funky-deal place’ that would do commercial loans no one else wanted to do,” Walpole mortgage broker Jim Driscoll said, adding that some Bayview loans charged 10 percent annual interest or more.

Such “exotic” loans helped create the home-mortgage crisis by allowing people with bad credit to buy houses.

In Bayview’s case, the firm simply extended risky loans to small businesses instead of consumers.

However, the subprime-market meltdown has dried up funding for “exotic” mortgages over the past year.

As a result, Bayview spokeswoman Ellen Charleton said, her firm has switched its focus to “high credit-quality borrowers.”

More than 100 U.S. mortgage firms have gone under or ordered big layoffs over the past year. The Massachusetts Mortgage Bankers Association estimates that’s cost the state some 8,000 jobs.

jkronenberg@bostonherald.com

 
Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 08:15:22

Bloomberg: Banks are so overwhelmed by the U.S. housing crisis they’ve started to look the other way when homeowners stop paying their mortgages. “Some people stay in their houses until someone comes to kick them out,” said Angel Gutierrez, owner of Dallas-based Metro Lending, which buys distressed mortgage debt. “Sometimes no one comes to kick them out.” Few mortgage companies will admit they allow homeowners to stay in their homes without paying their bills.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-05 08:46:57

And the only logical conclusion is that this will drag out the mess longer and longer. Those are shadow foreclosures.

Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 09:01:35

It’s only fitting that the shadow finance system led to this, don’t you think?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 11:04:13

A coworker of mine has occasionally made the offhand remark that “possession is 90 percent of the law.” Now I finally have come to realize of what she speaks.

 
 
Comment by bizarroworld
2008-04-05 08:20:26

Across the Globe, Hints of More Perils in Housing

Mr. Cardarelli pointed out that adjusted for overall inflation, home prices rose at a slower rate in the United States in this decade than they did in many other countries, with the mid-2007 figure up 42 percent from the first quarter of 2000. Comparable figures included gains of 95 percent in Spain, 90 percent in Britain and 85 percent in France.

http://tinyurl.com/47khxg

It’s a world wide bubble party after all.

 
Comment by tresho
Comment by Left LA Behind
2008-04-05 12:53:21

The cost of living in dreary old Dublin is atrocious. The Guinness only does so much to numb the pain. If I were any of these non-doms, I would be looking for a gig in Singapore/HK/or Sydney.

Comment by Hazard
2008-04-05 15:56:45

Ah, that explains it. My college room-mate went on to grad school at Oxford, taught at a British university for many years. Much to my surprise he retired a few months ago AND moved to Ireland. Hmmm, the things you learn on this site.

 
 
 
Comment by jbunniii
2008-04-05 08:45:36

Haha, a friend of mine tried to convince me to go half-and-half with him on a condo-hotel “investment” in Vegas a few years ago.

As anyone could have predicted, that investment model isn’t working too well for those who fell for it:

Rooms With a Bubble View
Condo-Hotel Buyers See Investments Sour As the Market Weakens
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120735504829291471.html?mod=home_we_banner_left

“During the real-estate boom, many buyers purchased condo hotel rooms from developers hoping to get paid every time the room was rented. But as the market sours, condo hotels are coming back to haunt many of the people who bought the units, the developers that constructed the buildings, and the operators hired to run the hotels.”

“For many investors, the condo hotel may go down as the Pets.com of the real-estate bubble.”

Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 08:59:50

a friend of mine tried to convince me to go half-and-half with him on a condo-hotel “investment” in Vegas a few years ago. Well, don’t leave us in suspense. Did you go halfsies or not?

Comment by jbunniii
2008-04-05 09:17:40

Hell no I didn’t! And I just e-mailed him that WSJ article. Last I heard, he has gone on since that time to buy multiple properties in Florida and South Carolina. He was also training, at this late hour, for a California realtor license.

It has been at least a year, though, since I last heard him say a word on the net worth or income flow of his real estate investments.

 
 
Comment by shakes
2008-04-05 17:11:04

I follow the Vegas market closely and they were promoting/pumping these things like it was cool!! To me they were the new incarnation of a timeshare and I wanted nothing to do with them!! The Trump crap which just opened yet was selling like hotcakes in early 2005 to the point the salesperson told me I had to put $40,000 down site unseen now if I wanted one since she had so many calls she didn’t have time to explain and show the properties. I obviously declined and hung up going WOW this housing bubble is truly out of control and I will not buy anything until everything is built and 2 years have passed since the last construction. It looks like 2012 will be when I start to look again, that is if they can figure out their water problem.

Comment by shakes
2008-04-05 17:58:34

I also clarify I will not purchase a condo hotel room!! The house gets all the profit without the risk. I believe that after things get bad and an upswing is on the horizon they will purchase the units back at a great discount once the numbers make sense.

 
 
 
Comment by taxmeupthebooty
2008-04-05 08:47:45

steigal smegal
read the 1998 CRA and then the W 2003 extension of same
loans based on skin tone
witness the birth of sub-prime
don’t ask , don’t tell

Comment by CrackerJim
2008-04-05 10:25:56

“read the 1998 CRA and then the W 2003 extension of same”

Could you define this a bit or give a reference?
I am interested in reading about it and learning more. Thanks

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 10:53:24

CREDIT WHERE IT COUNTS:
THE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT
AND ITS CRITICS
MICHAEL S. BARR*

(Caution .pdf)

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 11:00:51

“Critics lodge five main arguments against CRA: First, they argue that the CRA is unwarranted in theory because market failures and discrimination are not significant problems in credit markets and CRA is ill-equipped to address them if they are. Second, CRA provides little benefit to low-income communities and is costly because it forces banks to make unprofitable, risky loans and compliance costs are high. Third, CRA’s use of a legal standard rather than a rule is lawless, and contributes to its higher costs. Fourth, the scope of CRA harms banks and thrifts as well as the low-income communities it is intended to serve. Lastly, other alternatives are better able to overcome market failures and discrimination, and to help low-income and minority households.”

In retrospect, 2005 was a spectacularly unsuitable time to assess the validity of any of these criticisms. I suggest waiting until at least 2015 to look at the effects of CRA through the lense of the rear-view mirror.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by CrackerJim
2008-04-05 12:21:07

Thanks for the reference.
I am learning as I go here on this blog.
Some of this stuff gives me a headache though.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2008-04-05 08:53:44

http://www.gazette.com/articles/market_34955___article.html/housing_signs.html

“Economists” assuring readers of the Colorado Springs Gazette that the bottom is in (as if) and the local real estate market is showing “early signs” of recovery. Naturally, the Gazette scribblers never bother to point out these “economists’” ties to the local real estate industry.

 
Comment by tresho
2008-04-05 08:56:14

Constituents Grill Kansas Lawmaker on Economy, Foreclosures, Gas Prices
“Why are we borrowing from China just so people can buy Chinese goods?” said one, pointing to a portion of the $9.4 trillion in U.S. government debt held by the world’s most populous country.
KC Mayor Reardon then showed Rep. Dennis Moore Village West, a 400-acre site where retailers, restaurants and a planned theme park are turning open fields into an entertainment center.
The economy’s instability is affecting progress there, too. Reardon said he needs a $3 million federal grant to help create a rapid bus line to shuttle unemployed city workers to jobs the Village West contractors are having trouble filling because of its rural location. Why don’t the contractors transport their own employees? The congressman made no promises.
Kansas governor William J. Le Petomane Sebelius said “We need huge reinvestment to help average Americans,” she said. “We have to save our phoney-baloney jobs their homes and save their jobs.” We need more gubmint money.

 
Comment by SD_suntaxed
2008-04-05 09:10:13

How to lose $250,000 in just 3 easy years of payments.

http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/rfs/630993905.html

Purchase price back in March ‘05 of $1,005,000. New short sale price of $850K. The pictures fail to highlight the splendor of sitting next to a busy 6 lane highway. My best guess would be that the fake stucco colonnade out front is supposed to double as a sound wall. Sale price in ‘98 was $413K.

 
Comment by txchick57
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-05 09:52:15

Woo hoo. We’re Number One in babymammas! Woo hoo!

 
Comment by Negative Creep
2008-04-05 11:01:39

“Ladies, unfortunately, you are looking at Philly, DC and Santa Ana.”

Yes, ladies, by all means go to Santa Ana for romance. BTW, make sure you bring your passport, an interpreter and perhaps some chic body armor from Liz Claiborne. Santa Ana is 76% “Hispanic,” is populated by 52% males and has a median age of 26 years old. I never drive through there at less than 45 m.p.h.–and that’s in the daytime.

 
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-05 23:05:32

jeez chick, I take one day off and you resort to this?

Im taking a week off.

Im long, backed the truck up already, market goes higher, buying the weakness. no stops, just deep discount buying. Everythings I want or need is absolutely rock bottom cheap.

new deck, painting the ponderosa, new car, canning suppies for the garden, gonna be a great summer….

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 10:44:41

HUD estimated family incomes by MSAs (caution: .pdf)

For example, here are SD county estimates for 2004 & 2008:

SAN DIEGO-CARLSBAD-SAN MARCOS, CA 53544 72100

Approximate annual income inflation rate from 2004-2008:

((72100/53544)^(1/4)-1)*100 = 7.7 pct

Hmmmm…

Note: The inflation estimate assumes that we are comparing the same households across periods (not sure to what extent that assumption is reasonable).

 
Comment by tiger
2008-04-05 11:02:39

I’ve been seeing a lot of notices from business apologizing for having to raise prices for reason like higher food, health insurance and labor costs. A couple were from restaurants and one from one of a metal supplier. They are sometimes tacking on a flat charge or raising all prices by a percent. It seems like they are pretty urgent as they didn’t have time to change the menu prices or list prices or maybe they don’t think it would be worth it if they think they will have to just change them again.

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-05 12:19:30

Prices have been climbing in rural Alabama as well. Particularly gas prices. Around here the average good ol’ boy is driving a monster extended cab V8 4X with huge tires, straight pipes etc - down the highway at 75 - 80 mph regardless of speed limits. They apparently consider it their God given right to have cheap gas and $3.40 a gallon is killing them (but not slowing them down) since most work at minimum wage jobs and sponge off their elderly parents who have meager assets themselves. Gas stations around here had free rein on their prices until the Wally World opened and established a ceiling on what they could charge, yet prices keep climbing. Even so, all I hear is whining about how they can’t afford gas for their trucks (at $110 a pop for a fill-up) and how they are leaving school to work a second job to make their truck payments, insurance (astronomical for many due to their records), and pay for gas. My advice - slow down or get rid of their truck - is usually met with an incredulous look and the words “git rid of ma truck??? But how would I haul ma BASSBOAT???? (The $45.000 boat story is for another thread).

Comment by Hazard
2008-04-05 16:11:20

Yeah, but don’t forget they also need vehicles like that to haul the snakes around that they use for the local church services. I mean, who wants to sit next to one of those critters on a nice Sunday morning when you’re intending to go get some salvation.

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-05 16:32:03

What’s funny is that I’ve never met more people so deathly afraid of snakes as the folks down here…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-05 22:52:54

mrs voz very good friend, mrs voz was maid of honor at the wedding in Hawaii last december.

calls, says has $115.00, cant sell the H3, cant sell home on the Big Island for what they have in it, no work……credit cards…

this is the big BK…its their own damn fault.

Consumo-tard behavior liquidating “assets”.

kinda like de-leveraging in deflation. If you not a buyer just sit back and watch. pick up quality on the way down, but only if you really want or need it.

Im still being shut out of a high quality notso_liquid_paper

 
 
Comment by exeter
2008-04-05 12:28:05

Interesting observation by Teamster/Longshoreman contacts in SanFransisco. Oil barges are arriving empty and leaving full, with refined products, diesel etc.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-05 13:16:36

Is the added value of refined crude oil any different in the USA, vs. being refined somewhere else?

 
Comment by simiwatch
2008-04-05 17:43:33

If you drive around N. LA and around the Ventura area you can see a lot of old mothballed oil rigs pumping. They have sat idle for a long time. Exporting?

Comment by combotechie
2008-04-05 18:18:59

It’s probably Supply meeting Demand.

 
 
 
Comment by spike66
2008-04-05 14:18:41

This is one of the funniest videos ever. Bear Stearns bankers as day laborers…

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1189405/job_market_2009/

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-05 15:26:00

Real estate agents aren’t real in the UK.

‘We’re back to having to work hard’
By Daniel Thomas
Published: April 4 2008 23:01 | Last updated: April 4 2008 23:01

There is little sympathy for estate agents from anyone who has tried to buy a house in recent years, given their role as gatekeepers between homes and the hordes of movers desperate for a place to live. Property sellers have even less reason to laud them, such have been the costs of a service that sometimes seemed as easy as handing over the keys to the eager new owner.

But that was last year. The first few months of 2008 have seen a rapid change in circumstances as the UK housing market buckles after its stellar run over recent years. The difference on the high street is tangible following the end of the recent house-price boom, which paved the way for widespread changes to the estate agency market over the past decade.

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-05 16:45:00

AP: Old canals concern federal water bosses
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080405/ap_on_re_us/aging_irrigation_canals

600 homes in the town of Fernley, Nevada were flooded in January when a 100 yr old canal failed. Many others of similar antiquity in the West, e.g.: Phoenix area.

“Fernley is the perfect example. The canal has been here 100 years and all the sudden 500 homes get constructed next to it,” McCracken told The Associated Press.

 
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-05 23:28:04

sadly, Charlton Heston has departed…… The original Planet of the Apes is still a fine movie. damn dirty apes!

the picture running on Yahoo is from the 80’s and appears to coincide with a SAG strike from the 80’s…double dip inflationary recessionary deleveraging scenario is not applicable to today.

its the forward lookin goggles talkin, not me.

nothing to see here, except damn dirty apes!

Comment by Hoz
2008-04-06 10:45:28

Hey! I washed this month.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post