April 11, 2008

Weekend Topic Suggestions!

And send in your housing bubble pics to:

hbbphotos@gmail.com




RSS feed | Trackback URI

125 Comments »

Comment by taxmeupthebooty
2008-04-11 06:03:00

details on each candidate’s bailout and cap gains treatments
who’s the biggest commie?

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-11 06:24:30

I’d have to go with Joe Stalin.

Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2008-04-11 06:44:16

Mao by a mile.

Comment by oc-ed
2008-04-11 09:36:45

I’m leanin to Lenin …

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by hoz
2008-04-11 11:45:26

Jesus Christ IMHO

 
Comment by phillygal
2008-04-11 13:49:34

don’t believe so, Hoz.

Aren’t all the best communists also atheists?

(except Fidel of course, when he was gravely ill and called for a Catholic priest or two)

 
Comment by hoz
2008-04-11 14:54:46

“Holy Communion”

Share fishies and loaves of bread. Enjoy reading the Gospels from a communist viewpoint.

Communism is a socioeconomic structure that promotes the establishment of a classless, stateless society based on common ownership. Sounds like first century Christianity to this boy.

Jesus was clearly the first communist. Catholicism is well after Jesus death.

 
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-11 20:20:44

yes, “they” are crazy.

Im just glad they are not out to get me

 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2008-04-11 06:33:38

“Who’s the biggest commie”?

I know I sound like a broken record, but the turds floating around in the D.C. cesspool are unlimited. 99.9 % need to be flushed out, term limits should be imposed immediately (of course that ain’t gonna happen) It all about power, money & control as always. Both parties SUCK!

Comment by edhopper
2008-04-11 06:52:06

I understand the desire for term limits. But the results might not be what you think.
There’s the problem of with to new candidates. the best financed one winning. That could either mean a lot more millionaires in Congress and a lot more corporate shills.
There are also some really great Congressmen. The know the system and do a great job working for us. I think of Richard Lugar for the Republicans and Ted Kenedy for the Democrats, depending on your slant.
If both parties suck, do you believe in some happy middle where everyone comes together and works things out. Where is the Happy Middle on Iraq, abortion, torture, tax cuts, health care. Real issues with big differences.

Comment by MEaston
2008-04-11 07:50:24

The biggest thing we have to get rid of is gerrymandering. Districts are designed to keep one party in charge. When that happens the candidate is picked by a very small # of people. Unlike presidential primaries there is usually no one within the party willing to compete with the incumbent.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Front Range Bob
2008-04-11 07:52:39

“Where is the Happy Middle on Iraq, abortion, torture, tax cuts, health care. Real issues with big differences.”

Reall issues indeed, but ones that never should have gotten to the state they’re in.

“There are also some really great Congressmen.”

That one made me laugh. Good joke, even if you didn’t intend it that way. ;-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Kirisdad
2008-04-11 09:53:59

First of all, Ted Kennedy is a Senator. Second, no forget it, admiration for Ted Kennedy says it all. Politics will be partisan forever.

 
Comment by edhopper
2008-04-11 11:10:44

If your a progressive Ted Kennedy has been an excellent Senator. Just as Lugar has been for Conservatives.
Yes they’re Senators, I assumed that when we talk about Congress, we mean both houses.

 
Comment by are they crazy
2008-04-11 11:54:00

Like blaming banks for idiots that screwed themselves with crazy loans, over buying, or helocing and living beyond their means, blaming the politicians misses the point. Half the country doesn’t bother to vote at all, and most of the public has no clue about the candidates beyond soundbites and headlines. Partisanship, political parties and all the rest of the complaints are nothing new. An apathetic and ignorant public is the real problem.

 
Comment by hd74man
2008-04-11 15:57:01

RE: An apathetic and ignorant public is the real problem.

Yes, but at least we know whether Britney Spears has her underwear on or off on any given day.

This IS important!

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by steinravnik
2008-04-11 06:18:31

I have a suggestion for a topic.

I’m in Washington, DC. I’ve been watching the local market here since 2004. In the past year, I’ve noticed the exurbs and suburbs getting hit really hard. Parts of Prince William County are down 50+% since the peak, and the county as a whole is currently down 30% YOY. PWC had a lot of subprime lending and they were one of the first areas to start buckling under pressure.

Close-in desirable neighborhoods in the District are still faring fairly well. They are down 5-10% since the peak, but seem to be holding fairly steady. During the boom, these areas rose just as much as everywhere else. These neighborhoods are still running with 6 months supply or less of inventory. Foreclosures are non-existent.

My question is, when will these areas drop? Will they ever drop like the suburbs/exurbs? How does the increased desirablilty of living in the city (improved city amenities compared to pre-bubble times, walkable communities, high price of petrol making mass transit more desirable) play into the downturn? Will these city areas remain expensive in this post-bubble world?

Comment by WT Economist
2008-04-11 06:28:04

(Will these city areas remain expensive in this post-bubble world?)

Do you mean relatively or in absolute dollars? And per square foot or overall?

I believe there has been a structural shift favoring close-in areas in major metro areas where the close in areas are not social landfills. The demand for such areas now exceeds the supply, while for McMansion exurbs the opposite is true — there is plenty to go around.

Cyclically, however, the prices are still too high close in, just like everywhere else.

Let’s take the NYC case. When we were looking to buy a house in the early 1990s, a 1915 rowhouse without parking in Windsor Terrace Brooklyn, a 1940s rowhouse with a rear garage and front garden in further out (but still in NYC) Forest Hills Queens, and an early 1960s Levit ranch in the suburbs of Long Island, all cost the same — about $200 K.

I expect the Brooklyn house I live in to sell for more than the other two in the other two unless the state really succeeds in destroying NYC (they’ll try). But it sure as hell won’t sell for $1 million in todays’ dollars, the recent price.

 
Comment by WT Economist
2008-04-11 06:35:00

BTW, with what may happen to mass transit and the price of gas, I’m glad I live close enough to bike the nine miles to work.

But the ideal commute is one I heard about one guy having in DC. He bikes the Potomac, picks up a boat at a boathouse, rows to another boathouse, picks up another bike, and rides to work.

People pay big bucks to go on vacation to do things like that. He gets to do it every day.

Comment by Jean S
2008-04-11 07:52:29

although winter would be challenging….there are people who do that here (OR), no matter what. January must be interesting.

 
Comment by Molly
2008-04-11 08:26:18

“He bikes the Potomac, picks up a boat at a boathouse, rows to another boathouse, picks up another bike, and rides to work.”

By day three of this I’d be preparing to kill myself.

A bit of this on vacation is one thing. Day after life-sucking day of this would get really old, really fast.

At least on public transportation I could read or knit.

Comment by Bub Diddley
2008-04-11 14:00:06

Saves money on a gym membership, at least.

In many other countries people live close enough to their jobs that walking, biking, or taking public transit is considered “normal.” Not that these people are necessarily smarter than Americans, but they were fortunate to have the bulk of their cities built before the dawn of the automobile age. Their transition away from fossil fuel dependence will be much less painful than ours.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-04-11 15:03:09

‘People pay big bucks to go on vacation to do things like that. He gets to do it every day.’

In my lifelong observation of the smart bald monkey clan I have come to at least one truth:
If you ‘have’ to do it, then it’s not ‘fun’.

 
 
Comment by packman
2008-04-11 06:35:52

Good discussion topic.

My take (from someone living in the exurbs, though not commuting to the city) is that the exurbs’ curve is more extreme, and ahead of the city areas by about a year or two. It’s more extreme because the exurbs see more expansion during boom times, and conversely more contraction during bust times.

Downtown DC is declining somewhat now I think. It’ll continue declining after the economy levels off (*if* if levels off). Eventually the exurbs will start to pick up again, then they city.

Generally it depends on the area, especially the case with DC which is so affected by government policy. Loudoun and Fairfax counties were the biggest boom this time due to military and security contracting. My guess is that MD will boom bigger than NoVA next time, due to health care being the next big government thing, and the decline of the military as we pull out of Iraq.

That’s my impression at least that that’s the general layout of gov services around here - more military in NoVA, more health care in MD - I could be wrong about that though.

Comment by jim A
2008-04-11 07:04:54

Well arguably we’ve had an oversupply of housing constructed. Nowhere near as bad as MIAMI, but it’s still there. Because bluefields developments are easier than infill or highrise construction, the supply of those relative to the the demand of those who would trade commuting time for grass yards and HOAs has risen more than the supply of “urban living” or close in suburban developments. I don’t think that we’re seeing what many here have posited, that there is decline in the relative demand for the (energy and time) inefficient exurban living. I’m sure that some have overestimated their ability ability to afford the time and money of a long commute. But I believe that relative price decline differentials between exurb and inner suburb/urban markets is mostly supply, not demand driven.

Comment by WT Economist
2008-04-11 07:32:02

It is certainly supply driven, but many people moved futher out because it was the only place they could afford bigger houses, which was the social trend. That social trend may be going into reverse, and people may be fed up with the money for the long commute.

http://www.philly.com/philly/business/homepage/20080409_Long_commutes__gas_prices_crimping_American_Dream.html

“When Brian and Dawn McCausland bought this Colonial on a half acre in Montgomery County in 2004, they made a deal with the devil during a sky-high housing market: They and their four daughters would live here, but Brian would commute 100 miles round-trip to his job as an insurance adjuster in Delaware County.”

“But now, with gas averaging $3.30 and rising, the McCausland dream is getting soaked at the pump to the tune of $300 a month, or $3,600 a year, double their cost four years ago. They are among many families of modest means who took on big commutes from exurbia for a taste of upward mobility.”

“Such commuters often are pursuing a post-World War II idea that success is measured as a new house in the burbs. Expensive gasoline and the growing scarcity of developable land closer to job centers is threatening that ideal.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Moman
2008-04-11 09:37:22

Thank goodness too. I have one word for people who do that lifestyle: suckers.

Had an old boss do that in Tampa. Drove 60 miles each way to work and lived in the exurbs. He went to buy a Land Rover but the salesman showing honesty told him it would eat him alive in gas (and this was in 2003).

Last I heard his neighborhood was full of foreclosures and the halo had worn off that scam of a lifestyle.

 
Comment by eastcoaster
2008-04-11 11:32:59

They should have stayed in their Bucks County home and added on if necessary. Or maybe stopped at 2 kids?…

The wife says she always wanted a home and a loving husband. Sounds like she has them both so I think she should be counting blessings. And they’re not going broke, just breaking even.

Yet again another article that isn’t newsworthy whatsoever.

 
Comment by Bub Diddley
2008-04-11 14:02:39

“The wife says she always wanted a home and a loving husband. Sounds like she has them both”

Yeah, she’s got a loving husband…out there on the turnpike somewhere…should be home by 9 o’clock or so…but at least in the meantime she gets to enjoy the house without him getting in her way!

 
 
 
 
Comment by taxmeupthebooty
2008-04-11 06:46:09

as soon as fed cuts workers = never
I’m in 22151 and off peak by 15+%

Comment by Front Range Bob
2008-04-11 08:03:59

There was a study published just before my wife and I left the D.C. metro in 2001 that claimed Feds as a percentage of per capita income in D.C metro area aren’t that significant. Rather, the post-9/11 military and other such contractor employees constitute the most significant income class in the area, and I imagine that impact has only grown over the past few years.

That likely being the case, it’s reasonable to expect that the D.C. metro area won’t suffer a relatively major economic downturn until after the U.S. stops engaging in military actions and rebuilds the armed forces infrastructure. In other words, never is probably as good a guess as any.

 
 
Comment by michael f
2008-04-11 06:59:28

I live off in Rockville/North Bethesda and am totally amazed that prices in my neighbor have not really fallen and houses do not stay on the market for more than one or two weeks.

Comment by BJ
2008-04-11 09:50:20

I am in Southeastern Ohio. Homes here are lingering on the market for months and a couple of them for over a year , yet they refuse to reduce the prices.
Several have taken their homes off the market.
What will it take for “reality pricing” to set in?

 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-04-11 07:13:27

Price of oil will hammer all suburbs harder than inner cities.

 
Comment by steinravnik
2008-04-11 07:39:54

I guess I meant as compared to pre-bubble. Lots of neighborhoods in upper NW DC have traditionally been middle-class or upper middle class neighborhoods, but during the bubble rose to levels that only the uber-rich can afford. Former lower-class areas became middle-class neighborhoods. Has the bubble permanently altered the composition of the city? Gentrification of DC began in the early 90’s, but it seems the bubble accelerated the trend. Since the bubble has burst, it seems that the gentrification train is continuing to roll. It’s very strange. People I work with that make less money than me can live in these now upper-class areas, while it seems that if I want to buy, I have to settle for something less. So it’s a little frustrating.

Comment by Hazard
2008-04-11 11:30:21

It would be interesting to see a study on comute/travel/traffic in the various cities as this seems to directly affect housing prices. I’ve spent a lot of time in the DC area and the traffic there has to be seen to be believed. Just horrible. But the same can be said for parts of Atlanta as well. NY is tough but traffic does move outside the city - at least it does on the NJ turnpike (survive that and you can make it anywhere). Boston is in a class of its own though, the worst place I’ve ever driven in, a nice city but …

 
 
Comment by JimAtLaw
2008-04-11 17:53:34

If you’re not seeing foreclosures in the area you’re watching, perhaps the homes you’re looking at were financed with Alt-A I/O or option ARMs rather than subprime - the reset curves look much different, and you may not see a tidal wave of foreclosures for another year or two.

Then again, how hard are you looking for foreclosures? Here in CA, we can use Foreclosure Radar, how are folks looking in DC?

Comment by steinravnik
2008-04-11 21:18:03

I’ve looked up the property records for areas that I’m interested in, the majority appear to have been bought long ago. I think they will eventually be affected, but only after everything else has. These areas represent the most desirable neighborhoods. I’m just wondering how much they will go down in the end, and how long it will take. I will check out that Foreclosure Radar site.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2008-04-11 06:21:39

Not so quiet food riot…

I read yesterday the credit card (not debit card) use is going up rapidly, for wide ranging expenses , such as day care and grocery purchases. What’s next mass C. card default?

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/JD12Dj01.html

Comment by ACH
2008-04-11 06:50:28

Yes, many many believe this. I think so myself. The defaults will come when the cards are finally maxed and the users are overextended. This should come later this year. The Bush money will delay this as a major problem until AFTER the election. At that point, this incompetent boob will be gone and another in his place.
Roidy

 
Comment by WhatOnceWas
2008-04-11 06:58:52

What’s next mass C. card default?”

I’d say yes….I see it anectdotelly, but a lot of friends seem to be floating some payments on the belief that they will catch up next month. I think the herd will spend until they can’t, then?? crasssh.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-04-11 07:18:44

Agree. People will use cards until they can’t anymore. It’s the same psychology as that of HELOCs. No accountability. They’re no longer afraid of BK or low FICOs, and even if they were, the desperation will override that.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-11 07:49:16

Lost:

Good point~

Credit cards are like a bottomless wallet or purse always full of money, to many.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by KenWPA
2008-04-11 08:59:16

Seems as though the CC companies send out those convenience checks every other month. Those would be like getting an extra paycheck if you took advantage of them.

I think those that are in debt up to their eyeballs will continue digging until they can dig no further and just file Bankruptcy. Really, what are their other options? File now or keep digging and hope that a miracle happens.

 
 
 
Comment by hd74man
2008-04-11 16:05:02

RE: I think the herd will spend until they can’t, then?? crasssh.

Well, why the fook shouldn’t people who hold credit card debt they can’t afford, expect a government bail-out, especially when the card companies raise their interest rates.

Seems to be the rule with for all the FB’ers who signed on to variable rate mortgages they can’t afford.

Do I hear debt moratorium?

 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-04-11 07:17:14

The recent food riots in Haiti taught me that one staple of the poor Haitians’ diet is ‘dirt cakes’, dirt mixed with some sort of food paste and cooked. I imagine Americans will riot long before they begin eating dirt. Perhaps we can eat the rich?

Comment by ex-nnvmtgbrkr
2008-04-11 07:57:51

“……..it’s people!!”

Comment by Sleeper
2008-04-11 10:28:55

Hell, I’ll have a nice big helping of soylent green if I know it was made from ex hedge fund managers. Oh wait,,, That would probably give me gas,…If it didnt poison me first ;-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-04-11 11:37:08

“Perhaps we can eat the rich?”

Probably not, although I might look the other way in denial if I caught my dog munching on one. (On the farm my docile little well fed lab has developed a bloodlust for rabbits. If hungry…..) ;)

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-04-11 15:09:21

I read that, too, about the eating dirt.
Incidentally, I was once an amateur geophagist because my motto is the same as Riki Tiki Tavi’s: ‘Run and find out’, or in this case, ‘Get a spoon and see how it goes.’
I learned that kapowsin silt loam may LOOK like fudge, but it doesn’t taste like it, and that grit is annoying. Still, I’d rather eat dirt than eat the rich. They’re probably full of chemicals and fatty substance things.

 
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-11 20:07:08

watcher, for a gun that talks shelf run, empty the chamber..

you do run your mouth kinna reckless.

 
 
 
Comment by Frank Hague
2008-04-11 06:28:58

I’d like to see a thread on the effects of the economic slow down people are seeing at the companies they work for . I work for a company that has done very well for the past two years, blowing through earnings targets and a getting a decent rise in the price of the stock. I was in a meeting at the beginning of the February where the VP I work for was talking about how we are going to add staff and make large investments in the business. A month later most development money for new products was cut off and a significant layoff was put in motion.

Comment by WT Economist
2008-04-11 06:51:12

I don’t think this has really hit most people outside of housing and real estate. It hasn’t affected the place I work at all, and no one seems to be complaining. This is in NYC.

It seems that a long of the falloff in consumer demand has hit imports and immigrants, some of whom are going home. And people are still running up the credit card bills to spend. Global growth and exports are cushioning the blow, though also pushing up inflation. So far it’s pretty much the best case scenario, considering.

We’ll see if the lack of spillover lasts. I think it’s starting to hit state and local public services, and that will certainly be a way the pain reverberates in NYC. And if rest of the world has problems as their bubble bursts, that will take that export cushion away.

Comment by Frank Hague
2008-04-11 07:41:04

I agree. My anecdotal evidence from the people I talk to is that most businesses and industries haven’t been significantly affected, yet (outside of those I know in Real Estate who are now starving). The company I work for does a lot of business with financial institutions, obviously this is going to cause some reductions in incoming revenue. I think as the months go on we are going to see more and more layoffs as companies realize that many of their corporate customers can not purchase the same amount of goods and services that they have in the past.

 
Comment by scdave
2008-04-11 08:11:03

starting to hit state and local public services ??

Yep….And (unlike the private sector) they are completely dysfunctional when it comes to contracting…They rely solely on hiring freeze, pay freeze, attrition and raising fee’s to deal with times like this…

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-04-11 11:46:31

“I think it’s starting to hit state and local public services, and that will certainly be a way the pain reverberates in NYC.”

Yeah, WT Ec, the upstate locals are already writing letters to the editor blaming their tax increase proprosals on the NYC welfare state and talking succession. (shakes head) Then there’s the idiot that wrote a very strident letter exclaiming that America has to do something about the Arabs cuz they’re ruining the dollar with their high gas prices. (Sometimes I’m really embarassed to live here.) My greatest fear is that politicians will ride these misunderstnadings and use them to whip up the crowds to their advantage.

 
 
Comment by Hillary
2008-04-11 10:22:00

I’d have to disagree with the others. I work at a company that sells IT equipment b-to-b. we’ve seen a 50%+ dropoff in the last six weeks - it’s like companies are suddenly afraid to spend money. anecdotally, we’ve heard it’s hitting everyone in our little industry just as hard, and the less well managed companies are starting to have cash flow issues.

 
Comment by salinasron
2008-04-11 11:38:04

I talked to someone yesterday that worked for a national company with no slow down but one employee with a good job was in the process of losing her two houses here in Salinas and was getting ready to file BK hoping to get out of CC debt as well. Salary somewhere in the mid $40K.
Last weekend in PG and Carmel and Monterey: More business just gone. No prior notification.

 
Comment by eastcoaster
2008-04-11 11:39:42

I believe my company is recession-proof. Toxicology / crime lab. We are growing by leaps and bounds. Some of our employees should be on tonight’s episode of 20/20! (ABC was in here on Monday interviewing / filming.)

I was looking around at other jobs not too long ago, but I decided to stay put for now.

Comment by Olympiagal
2008-04-11 15:14:35

‘I believe my company is recession-proof. Toxicology / crime lab.’

Fook, yes, you’re recession-proof! Too bad you guys aren’t public, because I’d invest.

 
 
Comment by pamala in argentina
2008-04-11 15:48:51

I work in debt collections. While there are more accounts in default, it’s getting harder to collect, and the consumers are more irate as they struggle with their debt loads. No surprise there. Four trends that I am seeing and think notable: 1) state governments are requiring collection agencies to accept credit-card payments for the debt and/or installment payments; 2) the use of forced collections, e.g., garnishment of wages and financial assets and the lien/levy of properties, being used earlier in the collections cycle; 3) mandates that require financial institutions to provide reports to government-run databases to enable government to more easily identify financial assets that would be eligible for garnishment; and 4) debt buyers and credit issuers increasingly tapping into the Indian call-center populace to collect US debts.

Interestingly, some of the credit-card issuers refuse to allow consumers to put payments owed on their cards. Their view is that these consumers are already in default on what they owe, so it makes no sense to allow them to transfer that defaulted debt and the associated risk to the credit issuer. Also of interest is what the public relations fallout will be from off shoring jobs and then using the workers in those countries to collect from a very angry American consumer. I suspect the debt buyers won’t give a hoot, but some of the credit issuers will and may eventually pull back on off shoring. (Even though the credit issuer could sell the paper to debt buyers, some have stipulations on how the debts are collected because the credit was granted by their institution and their name is part of the debt record. )

From the ground in Argentina, the US wine market is slowing. We sell fine wine grapes to a winemaker who exports to the US. He tells us that the low-end sales ($20 to $30 per bottle) are way down, but that the high-end market is going strong. He’s bracing for a two-year downturn based on what his distributors are telling him. Fortunately, he also exports to China, Mexico, India and several other Latin American countries, such as Brazil and Columbia, and has seen those markets increase.

Comment by cactus
2008-04-11 20:11:43

I work in US debt collections in Argentina ?

Comment by pamala in argentina
2008-04-11 21:10:00

Yes, via the Internet. I am not a collector. I work as a consultant/contractor doing sales and marketing work.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by reorealtor
2008-04-11 06:34:57

how about a discussion on other international markets that are “frothy”.
whether or not they used no down easy money, and whether they packaged loans in MBS’s. A couple trillion hit on an international scale, will that affect the US housing market, or more?

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-11 06:45:34

The entire world is like a big financial pinball being batted around, as all the various players are shaking the pinball machine violently, causing the inevitable…

TILT

 
Comment by pamala in argentina
2008-04-11 16:13:41

The real estate market in our area of Argentina (province of Mendoza) has slowed dramatically. There is no credit to buy real estate. In general, credit is not awash here and is very expensive if you can get it, e.g., 30% to 40% at the national bank for a vehicle loan. It’s 100% cash to make a real estate purchase. The price increases were mainly due to folks from the US, UK, Europe, and Canada coming here and buying, some to live here and some as investments. In 2006, there were about 100 families that moved to our smallish town (under 200K population). Last year that dried up, and the real estate agents that cater to the out-of-country buyers are looking for other work. Some have folded up shop.

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-11 07:03:15

What becomes of those “Left Behind”?

I’m talking of the vast millions of middle-class Americans, that are now beginning their descent towards poverty and loss of self-esteem…

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-11 07:19:22

They should be enjoying the granite countertops and stainless steel appliances in their “American Dream”, shouldn’t they?

 
Comment by watcher
2008-04-11 07:20:03

Populism leads to fascism, or revolution.

 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2008-04-11 07:26:24

Already happening, and we will have to redefine our values a bit. Appearances will hopefully become less important, maybe we can start looking at how well people live their lives and do whatever job they do, rather than how much they make doing it. I saw a blog by a Prosperity Preaching Pastor’s wife that made me ill, her before and after permanent cosmetic treatment. Only in this current climate could such bs be accepted from someone purporting to be in the “helping others” industry.

 
Comment by eastcoaster
2008-04-11 11:43:56

I know of a woman who makes no excuses for the fact that she’s looking for a rich man to take care of her because she’s so burned out financially. Seems she has a sucker, er I mean rich boyfriend presently. She’s so fried that I guarantee she’ll marry him if he asks (even though she’s told me he’s not her type…well except for his bank account).

Point being, this is just one example of what someone desperate will do NOT to be “left behind”. Sad.

 
Comment by phillygal
2008-04-11 13:09:51

send numerous applications to Oprah’s Big Give

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-11 07:09:41

I expect new versions of this to come along…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utopia

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-11 08:12:50

Yeah, it really worked well the first time around.

Oh goody! We get to talk about failed Fourierist experiments like Brook Farm all over again.

Didn’t people get the memo of why these things fail in the first place, and are always doomed to fail?

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-11 08:16:29

Failure is what you make of it.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-11 09:05:37

Keep telling yourself that, sparky!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-04-11 15:15:41

Hahaha! Yeah, ‘be positive’, man!

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by edhopper
2008-04-11 07:12:07

I don’t understand this.
How are houses still selling at these prices. Yes inventory is way up and sales are down, but prices are still ridiculous.
Here in NYC, outside of Manhattan, you cannot find a SFH in a decent area for under $500k. And that’s for starter homes. A nice one is still between 600k and 700k.
Someone would have to make over $100k to afford them. And these are in working class neighborhoods. I don’t see many Wall Street types moving to Woodside or Sheepshead Bay.
I look at the math and I do not understand how people can afford the monthly payments at these prices.
I mean $700k for this!?!
http://newyork.craigslist.org/que/rfs/629997248.html

Would someone making $150k a year (making it affordable) really live here?
What do you think is going on? Credit is tight now, supposedly the ARM and IO liar loans are a thing of the past, how are these houses selling at these prices.
And the strange thing is even in the poorer neighborhoods, where foreclosures are a big problem, the prices are absurd.
http://newyork.craigslist.org/que/rfs/637561647.html
Corona is not a terrible neighborhood, but it is not a desirable one either.
It’s basically a working immigrants community. I don’t see people who make the $100k needed to afford this POS. (4x income).
http://newyork.craigslist.org/que/rfs/637561647.html
I am baffled by this.
And this is personal. since my wife and I very much want to move and would like to buy (at a realistic price).
I just look at these prices and think about the type of people who live in the area and would buy there and it just doesn’t add up. I am perplexed.

Comment by scdave
2008-04-11 08:23:06

I am perplexed ??

To some degree I am also but every time I try to rationalize it I come full circle back to the same spot…”Jobs & Income”….Example; A two year twenty something fire fighter here is making 120k per year PLUS he has a 2nd job that he expects will generate another 30k per year…Now, if he happens to marry someone with even modest income they blow through the 200k mark quite easily…So, there ya go….

Comment by Michael Fink
2008-04-11 08:43:33

Are you serious, a firefighter in NYC makes 120K a year 2 years into the job? I have a little trouble with that statistic, not saying that it’s not true, but the number of people making 100K+ is SUCH a small portion of the population that I just have trouble believing that firefighers/police/etc are part of that group in any meangful numbers.

Comment by Kirisdad
2008-04-11 10:25:27

A NYC firefighter does NOT make 150K/yr. Their salary tops out at $65,000 after five years. Scdave must be from Cal. where the unions run the city and the state. Example LAPD vs NYPD payscales.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2008-04-11 11:09:30

Scdave must be from Cal ??

Yes….Silicon Valley…And the info is accurate…

 
Comment by Kirisdad
2008-04-11 14:06:01

How are those salaries paid ? RE taxes must be astronomical. Whats going on in Cal. and how could it possibly continue? Theres a thread for the weekend.

 
Comment by cactus
2008-04-12 06:46:22

How are those salaries paid ? overtime and its true

 
 
Comment by ahansen
2008-04-12 11:00:56

First year Kern County firefighter =78K. Jr. college “fire sciences”
“degree.” No sheis.

Los Angeles County firefighters making 200+K a year are common. Four days a week. Three days off to work their “real” jobs. Full benefits for themselves and their families. Plus scholarships for the kids. Plus free golf, skiing, attractions, etc. All for sitting in theater chairs watching soft porn or the occasional game of handball. Occasionally some old person gets stuck on a toilet seat and has to be “rescued.” The career goal is to be Injured On the Job (which translates to hiding the weekend warrior injuries until they go back on duty, then, oops, “slipping,”) so they can retire with FULL SALARY AND BENEFITS FOR LIFE.

Either crooks or bible-thumpers…or both. (Remember the neatly folded stacks of Levi jeans found in the fire trucks in the parking garage of the Twin Towers–the ones that “were blown into the truck from the blasts?”)
And puhleeze don’t give me that line about “when you really need one….” I live ONE MILE from a fire station. My house burned for an entire hour before they got here. They let it burn to vapor and didn’t even come up and TRY to put it out.)

I told my son to forget medicine. They hire illegal aliens to actually put out the wild fires so it’s not like you’re taking the risk of say, an urban high school English teacher.

(Rant off.) That said, firefighters are a lot of fun to play with if you’re into outdoor sports, horses, dirt, snow. Oh, and if not rich(ish,) then comfortable.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by scdave
2008-04-11 08:35:49

Sorry if this is a double post…Cyber space seems to have eat my post….

I am perplexed ???

I am also to some degree…Every time I try to rationalize it I come full circle back to the same spot…”Jobs & Income”….Example; A two year twenty something fire fighter here is making 120k per year PLUS he has a 2nd job that he expects will generate another 30k per year…Now, if he happens to marry someone with even modest income they blow through the 200k mark quite easily…So, there ya go….

 
Comment by Michael Fink
2008-04-11 08:40:46

150K is JUST barely enough money to even consider that 700K home. No way I would do it with anything less then 250K yr HH income.

And, to answer you’re question, no, not a chance in he(( would a family making 1/4 of M dollars a year want to live in a place like that. I don’t know NYC or the area very well, but unless that house is the worst in a 30 block radius… Well, let’s just say, that’s not where people making that kind of money live.

I am also baffled by it, although more (in my area of FL) by the condos with prices like that. How many people with 250K incomes are looking to live in a high rise condo in a terrible area? Doesn’t seem like a large (or even existent) portion of the population to me!

And remember, 250K HH income puts you in about the top 3% of all American households. That should help put things in perspective.

Comment by Front Range Bob
2008-04-11 09:24:23

“150K is JUST barely enough money to even consider that 700K home. No way I would do it with anything less then 250K yr HH income.”

Well, then theoretically my wife and I could do that. However, I can’t even begin to imagine obligating ourselves to pay that much money for a residence. That just seems insane to us, and would limit our ability to increase liquid saving, contribute toward retirement, travel, and enjoy really, really home-cooked meals.

Admittedly, we’re the odd ducks out in today’s society, but that’s perfectly fine by us.

 
 
Comment by edhopper
2008-04-11 11:14:45

What I am also saying is that people that make 6 figures are not living in these areas. So how are these homes even selling.I just don’t understand, the finances just don’t add up. Are people paying 80% of there income for housing?

 
 
Comment by masstexodus
2008-04-11 07:26:11

Is the popping bubble finally starting to hit “bubble proof” Austin TX? I see a lot of inventory towards the edge of the city …

Comment by vmlinux
2008-04-11 07:44:27

Austin doesn’t have huge natural gas and oil, but it’s a trendy to live in city, so I can’t see why it would be immune to bubble effects. In Amarillo our prices are still up 5 percent YoY, but that has a lot to do with the smaller towns around here making massive investments in oil and gas and the housing that is left over from the last big oil investment period are insufficient for the time being.

 
Comment by Hip in Zilker
2008-04-11 10:35:50

New McMansions in our part of Zilker neighborhood (just south of the river west of S Lamar Blvd, close to downtown and Zilker park) sit on the market quite a while before selling, although I haven’t noticed the teardowns slowing yet.

(Somewhat shabby) apartments on the corner of Treadwell and S Lamar were converted to condos. The sign on the building now says condos, but the big sales signs on the corner have been papered over with leasing signs.

One former condo project on S Lamar down by Sun Harvest is now for sale as commercial zoned land - don’t know if developers didn’t get their permit, didn’t get pre-sales, or just decided to get out of the game.

That said, every day I notice another condo project within a few blocks of S Lamar / Barton Springs Rd corner. The condo projects get a lot of grafitti on their billboards, especially the one right by Zilker Park at the WanFu restaurant site. The billboards mainly feature terribly bucolic pictures of the greenery that these projects are destroying, so the grafitti adds a nice “urban” touch.

I cannot imagine we aren’t heading for a pop. Today’s “Austin Towers” RE weblog has a “foreclosures” headline - talking about how we are different from the rest of the country. We ARE special in Austin of course, how could we not be? We’re so hip.

 
 
Comment by Big Bubble Popper
2008-04-11 07:29:40

Lets talk about student loans this weekend. As we all know because the housing bubble is a credit bubble, student loans are affected. We all know the stories about various lenders not making anymore student loans because of the credit crunch. However, that is only one side of this.

I think that student loan lenders will be affected by those who already have student loans as well. In about 99.5% of cases student loans will NOT be discharged during a bankruptcy. That doesn’t mean that you can’t stop paying on your student loans (at least “temporarily”). You can either get a deferment or a forbearance. In both of those cases you don’t pay on the student loan. The difference is that with a deferment interest doesn’t accumulate whereas with a forbearance it does. (I believe that the government pays the interest during a deferment.) This page seems to cover most of the reasons someone could get a deferment or forbearance:
http://www.youcandealwithit.com/cant_pay_student_loan/loan_deferment_forbearance.shtml

The upshot is as unemployment increases more people will get deferments. In fact, according to that webpage someone can still get a deferment if they are working under 30 hours a week. Even beyond unemployment there are lots of qualifications for “economic hardship”. Unlike mortgages where lenders are having trouble because lots of people are defaulting on them, with student loans there doesn’t need to be lots of defaults, just lots of deferments and forbearances for trouble. What happens when a significant number of borrowers of student loans for any particular lender isn’t paying because of deferments or forbearances, but not actually defaulting (although I’m sure many will default)?

Comment by twingirls
2008-04-11 10:01:03

I’m wondering what others are seeing on the rental front. I rent a townhouse in a large complex corporate owned in Woodland Hills California. The rents have bounced around for the last 2 years but now according to their website they are actually renting units like mine for $179 a month less than I’m paying. But of course the people that are currently here when up for renewal they are trying to hike the rents. Current tenants are really annoyed and alot are moving. I have 6 months on my lease left and called them and said if they reduced my rent I’ll sign up for another year. They said they couldn’t do it. Moving is not so easy as I have 6 year olds and have already moved twice since I sold my townhouse late 2003.
I’m still seeing house rental prices that are in dreamland. I wish this mess would speed up and I could buy but I know I’d be stupid to do that now.

 
Comment by Bub Diddley
2008-04-11 14:13:42

I’m curious about this because I want to get into grad school (yep, for one-a them limp-wristed humanities degrees that will never make me as much dough as an MBA…).

I’m also curious what the tightening of student loan credit will mean for colleges. The proliferation of borrowed money rather than saved money to pay for school is part of what has driven costs through the roof. Would schools actually end up cutting tuition costs in an attempt to attract students if loan money is harder to come by?

If so, then what would happen to all those cushy, you-can-never-be-fired-from-here positions on our nations college campuses? How about the gigantic sports stadiums and massive football and basketball budgets? There is so much waste at every level in most colleges and universities. I’m not a sports fan, so it annoys me that athletic departments are always better funded than any given academic department, but there’s plenty of waste in every aspect of the edu-ma-ka-shun racket.

Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-04-11 15:37:05

There is so much waste at every level in most colleges and universities.

Yup.

But it’s not just athletics. When I worked for a large, public Midwestern university (after I dropped out of one of those limp-wristed grad programs), the salaries for many administrators were through-the-roof unbelievable. Don’t even get my brother-in-law started about all the energy inefficiencies at the university where he’s part of the engineering staff.

There’s plenty of other fat to be cut off those sacred cows, even if athletic programs are a sensible place to start.

Comment by vozworth
2008-04-11 19:58:30

Olympics 2012 in Rio then? London is underweight. they just cut…EU to follow….if Japan cuts, money does not mean anything.

if you wanna trim the fat, let the good times roll.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by KyleO
2008-04-11 10:08:02

I want a human interest piece following up on the people mentioned in the articles. I want to know if these people google themselves after the local paper does its thing and find what less nicer :) people have to say about them.

Someone needs to track them down, call them up and invite them to a reunion post so we can see what they’ve been up to, how the kids are, and where their debt stands.

Comment by phillygal
2008-04-11 13:11:53

I like this idea.

 
 
Comment by Spykeeboi
2008-04-11 10:17:23

How about predictions for the major economic variables on Election Day 2008? Here are mine:

National Unemployment Rate: 6.1% (currently 5.1% Mar08)
3Q 2008 Inflation Rate (CPI-U yty): 3.1% (currently 4.0% Feb07)
3Q 2008 GDP Growth (annualized): -0.5% (currently 0.6% 4Q07)
Fed Funds Rate: 1.0% (currently 2.25%)

 
Comment by exeter
2008-04-11 11:09:30

An observation yesterday. Two co-workers are looking to buy. I was surprised to hear it. It opened the door for me to talk to them and they listened quite intently.

Topic suggestion: How many people do you know that are looking to buy and do you dissuade them and how.

Comment by watcher
2008-04-11 11:40:09

I will always buy or sell anything, if the price is right.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-11 11:50:15

If the perfect piece of property (100 gallon per minute well, nice views, proximity to rivers/creeks) came along, i’d be interested in buying it today…

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2008-04-11 12:13:00

Me too.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by exeter
2008-04-11 12:26:44

I’d prefer a circa 1994 single level ranch, treated plates, floors double sheathed, foam core insulation in walls, doubled up blue board on outside face of foundation walls, hydrophilic water stop in horizontal concrete joints, Vandex’ed waterproofing on all below grade surfaces, standing seam roof, scuppered roof drains with roof leaders properly routed to pre-cast seepage pits, double tyveked walls on a correctly contoured 3/4 acre site.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-11 20:04:12

exeter.

many have built homes, trimmed out, installed standing seam, painted and finished….

dude, you ride a bike to do take-offs.

 
Comment by ahansen
2008-04-12 11:25:51

Exeter.

Move to inland Low Cali. Water damage will not be one of your overriding concerns.

 
 
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-11 19:56:20

voz has a piece of Oregon with your name on it.

but….your in cali with solar and well already…..

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ahansen
2008-04-12 11:17:28

Lad, if you’re serious, keep your eye on the county land auctions and buy or access a good set of topo maps. Last year I picked up 70 acres with a view from SLO to LA, three springs, two ponds, 200′ drop (for hydroelectric,) holding tanks, irrigated terracing/grading, useable singlewide, two (stocked,) travel trailers, and deeded road access for less than 100K.

Now, here’s the secret:
Make friends with your local FBI. ATF. DEA. They’ll tell you where the busted pot farms are/were. Pounce!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by phillygal
2008-04-11 13:13:42

I’m looking to buy at a fair price.

It’s kind of hard to convince a landlord to knock down a wall in his house so I have room for an artist’s studio.

 
 
Comment by Kim
2008-04-11 13:39:14

How about some discussion on the rates of foreclosure in recourse states?

Here in IL, the lender can get a deficincy judgement for the difference between the mortgage and sale price. FBs have to think twice about jingle mail. Reo inventory is more-or-less steady while (if RealtyTrac is correct) NODs are off the charts, indicating the lenders are postponing actual foreclose for as long as they can.

This cannot be good for the state and county treasuries.

Is anyone else noticing this? Any speculation on the consequences and how long the banks and/or the market will take to correct?

 
Comment by Bub Diddley
2008-04-11 14:21:02

Ben, in the bits bucket today you stated:

“In the Texas bust many, many people did well. ”

I was too young (and not in TX anyway) during the last bust. The current bust is much bigger and more widespread, so there should be many more opportunities for many more people to “do well.” But how?

That’s my topic suggestion:

How does one capitalize on the housing bust?

How do ya make money in the coming environment? I’ve been working more to minimize my own risks for the coming economic downturn (I have no debt, I’ve set myself up in a recession-proof job, etc.) but I’m curious what the smart money will do to profit from this mess.

Comment by firefox user
2008-04-11 18:16:04

Wait. Snoop the sales, look for bargains. Do your homework and look at sales prices in the neighborhoods you want to buy in going back 15 years or more. See if you can dig up old RTC sales records (15+ yrs back).

We’ve got property from the last bust; worth 4x what we paid for it. Paid cash. Has saved about 150k in rent in the area over the time it’s been in the family. Cost about what we paid for it in repairs over the years.

Not a fancy house, but sturdy and suited to needs.

As to where to put smaller money than enough for a house/downpayment … I want to know, too. Right now I’m itchy about my CDs and my banks but am not quite ready to go to the hassle of jumping. But as quarterly reports come out on the banks/CUs … I’m looking hard at highly-rated (bankrate.com) to keep working money in (the in and out of monthly living) and hoarding money in (hurricane money, tax money).

My tech stocks are taking a dump, I should have never bought into an airline … good thing it’s all Roth IRA money and I’ve got a couple decades to fix it.

I’m probably going to take the boring investment track and keep educating us to bump us to higher paying positions within our career track. Keep an eye out for distressed properties near the beach, something the whole clan can enjoy.

 
 
Comment by Negative Creep
2008-04-11 15:19:38

Topic: Should the five Southern California counties be converted to a U.S. Territory and run by a military governor? (General Petraeus will do.)

 
Comment by JimAtLaw
2008-04-11 17:57:06

I’d love to see topics on (i) inflation (see my too-late suggestion from last weekend) and (ii) unique rent/buy arrangements.

One of the things I’ve been thinking about is going to a homedebtor and offering a long term lease option with 100% rent credit, price TBD by a panel of neutral appraisers, to be set in December 2010 or December 2011 at renter’s election.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-11 18:11:54

Psychological economics is all the rage these days. What does it matter what consumers “buy into” if they have no money left after paying for housing, groceries and fuel to spend on luxury consumption like new clothing?

US consumer confidence hits 26-year low
By Chris Bryant
Published: April 11 2008 16:22 | Last updated: April 11 2008 16:22

The soaring cost of basic foodstuffs and weakening labour market sent US consumer confidence spiralling to a 26-year low this month compounding the gloomy outlook for the US economy.

Consumer confidence as measured by the Reuters/University of Michigan consumer sentiment survey fell to 63.2 in mid-April, from 69.5 in March, the lowest since 1982 and much weaker than a reading of 68 forecast by economists.

One-year inflation expectations jumped by 4.8 per cent, their highest since October 1990, and up from 4.3 per cent in March.

Consumers would appear to be buying into the stagflation theme,” John Ryding, chief US economist at Bear Stearns said.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-11 18:14:54

The Face of a Prophet
By LOUISE STORY
Published: April 11, 2008

George Soros will not go quietly.

“I consider this the biggest financial crisis of my lifetime,” Mr. Soros said during an interview Monday in his office overlooking Central Park. A “superbubble” that has been swelling for a quarter of a century is finally bursting, he said.

 
Comment by firefox user
2008-04-11 18:33:41

I’d like people to weigh in on how their city and or HOA (if applicable) is handling the maintenance and upkeep of scorched-title properties. Someone here mentioned a town requiring registration of foreclosures and maintenance - but I don’t see how someone can make a bank foreclose faster and take responsibility in a required amount of time.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-11 18:58:04

Wall Street’s Insecurity
Cuts in Jobs, Bonuses
Add to Ripple Effect;
More Home-Cooking
By IANTHE JEANNE DUGAN
April 12, 2008

Comment by vozworth
2008-04-11 20:00:29

home cookin …..

thats the recovery story, keep talkin stucco.

 
 
Comment by cactus
2008-04-11 20:18:32

This guy I work with looked like he got punched in the gut when He found out a house near his was listed at 350K… he is asking 520K
Chandler AZ
Now he and his wife are thinking buy new cars pay for everything on CC and go bankrupt and give the house to the bank.
Weekend topic personal stories of FB’s are always interesting.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-11 23:09:22

Can the G-7 nations collectively do something for Uncle Buck’s recent slippage which has not already been attempted?

G-7 Sets Aggressive Tone On the Sagging Dollar
By Michael M. Phillips
Word Count: 727

WASHINGTON — The world’s major economic powers issued a warning to financial markets Friday that they won’t sit by and watch the dollar continue to slide against other big currencies.

In a highly unusual move, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and their counterparts from the Group of Seven nations said in a statement: “Since our last meeting, there have been at times sharp fluctuations in major currencies, and we are concerned about their possible implications for economic and financial stability.”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-11 23:11:41

Seven Steps to Survive a Cash Crunch

A surprise bill, or a sudden loss of a job can put your family’s liquidity in peril but the Fed isn’t going to bail you out if you get hit by a liquidity crisis. So where can you turn? Here are the seven habits of highly liquid people.

Comment by ahansen
2008-04-12 11:43:59

Seven steps…

I literally went back to see if the publish date was 4.1.
It wasn’t.
Funny find, PB.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-11 23:18:28

Time to drink some hair of the dog that bit us?

The American economy
The long hangover
Apr 10th 2008 | WASHINGTON, DC
From The Economist print edition
America’s economy is in recession. Don’t expect a quick recovery

By many measures the news from housing is still getting grimmer. Housing starts are at less than half their peak, and builders are continuing to cut back. Although this has begun to reduce the stock of unsold new homes, the frailty of demand means that supply still vastly outweighs sales. At 9.8 months’ worth of sales, the stock is at a 26-year high. The official overhang of existing homes (which excludes those repossessed) is not much lower. The excess of supply over demand means that the fall in house prices is accelerating. According to the S&P/Case-Shiller index, house prices are 13% off their peak. They fell at an annual rate of 25% in the three months to January.

The drop in house prices so far has left some 9m people, or 10% of all those with mortgages, owing more than their houses are worth. Among all mortgage borrowers, 6% are behind on their payments; among subprime borrowers, 17% are in arrears. Lenders are already foreclosing on more than 1m homes. The pessimists expect these figures to climb much higher, adding to supply and further depressing prices.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post