April 19, 2008

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For April 19, 2008

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

231 Comments »

Comment by vmaxer
2008-04-19 05:21:48

It looks gas will hit $4.00 a gallon soon and the grocery bill gets bigger every week. Any positive stimulus the FED is providing, is rapidly getting eaten up by inflation. At what point will the FED decide that further inflation just can’t be tolerated? Food and energy costs are becoming major concerns for consumers. Will we see a major consumer retrenchment, further slowing the economy? I suspect that food and energy costs will become a major problem in the coming months. People are a lot less interested in buying houses when paying for gas, to get to work, and food to eat, becomes an issue. This topic doesn’t seem to be getting the attention of the presidential candidate’s. Consumer’s need to start putting the candidate’s feet to the fire concerning this issue. The FED’s inflationary policies might just start the next leg down in this recession. The U.S.’s biggest export, right now, is inflation. Driving up the cost of basic necessities only makes people less able to afford current house prices, putting more downward pressure on house prices. The inflation the FED is causing will only make the housing problem worse.

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-04-19 07:13:41

The only place there is no inflation is in my rental.
Whipped cream in a can is five dollars.
Rice cakes go for four dollars.
Gas over here is three eighty.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-19 07:15:40

Yeah, this inflation things is $ucking big time. My wife is now charging me $50. Last year it was only $35. It looks like there will be more visits to self-serve.

Comment by Earl 288
2008-04-19 07:25:03

City Boy, You are the funniest guy in the world!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-04-19 09:26:46

does his wife think he is so funny? lmao

hey things must be real busy on the realtors world these days. the realtors who i spoke to weeks ago about some places have not stoped calling me even after i said i am not interested

i may have to get orders of protection on these stalkers

yeah were on the precipice of the recovery all right

hank paulson told me so

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2008-04-19 07:37:08

“My wife is now charging me $50.”

You’re getting ripped off! She only charges me $20.

ZING!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-19 07:53:15

That’s what happens when you charge according to size.

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 08:35:25

LOL

ZING!!!

 
Comment by jckirlan
2008-04-19 08:36:29

No wthat was an awesome comeback NYCBoy. Then again I thought Muggy had a funny line and the whole thread was witty.
“The jerk store called and the’re running out of you! No matter, your their all time best seller!”

 
Comment by Muggy
2008-04-19 08:38:41

That’s correct, I get the volume discount.

ZING! ZING!!

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 12:20:53

That’s only because she needs more of it to make up for the loss in size. :-D

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2008-04-19 16:26:59

Note to self: Never, ever try to get in a zinger on NYCityBoy. The retalitory strike is not only assured, it’s going to be devastating.

 
Comment by Muggy
2008-04-19 18:02:46

I concede (that’s what she said):

Muggy 0
NYCityBoy 1

NOT ZING!

 
 
Comment by ex-nnvmtgbrkr
2008-04-19 07:40:12

If you want something done right, you gotta do it yourself. Save the 50 bones for a nice round of golf.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Earl 288
2008-04-19 07:56:17

Cityboy. Manual mode is the easiest money you`ll ever make, just don`t get caught.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Lionel
2008-04-19 08:06:41

I have a friend, who, when things slowed down a little bit, told his wife that he was going to start outsourcing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-19 07:14:11

I went to a party last night attended by several lawyers and Wall Street types. I heard a lot of talk about “mortgages”. Several times I heard the CNBC party line of, “the worst is behind us”. I sat down with one of the guys at the party and discussed this entire mess in depth. You would have been proud of me. I very clearly and calmly used every fact I’ve learned over the past two years to refute this ridiculous claim. I told him the stock market was no barometer for reality. By the time he left he was literally shaking. He is a pretty nice guy so I didn’t do it with malice. But it was good to educate one of these guys.

Denial is rampant in Fantasyland.

Comment by combotechie
2008-04-19 07:22:09

“But it was good to educate one of these guys.”

I know the feeling. I just wish I could convince groups.

I can barely get the message through via one-on-one.

 
Comment by ex-nnvmtgbrkr
2008-04-19 07:42:37

Oh man, it’s a dangerous thing to unplug someone from the Matrix. Sometimes best just to let them stay plugged-in.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 07:48:15

Tell me about it!

Never do it. Never. And you might ruin your sister’s party too. :-D

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by SF Mechanist
2008-04-19 09:51:03

Yeah, no matter how neutral on the issue they say they are, no matter how much of an open mind they say they have, if they are somehow involved in this societal charade, it’s probably not worth it. Better to keep your big mouth shut and get invited back next time.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Earl 288
2008-04-19 07:28:40

If people in this country start dying of starvation, the stock market will ralley. Why? Because it won`t have to look at their ugly faces anymore.

Comment by Carlos Cisco
2008-04-19 08:31:19

Starvation? I dont know about your neck of the woods, but we here in Ohio have had to drill a few extra notches in the old rust belt. Yeah, the extra buck a gallon for milk and gasoline might tighten things up a bit, but not as much as a resetting mortgage. Even our homeless have people lining up to stuff sandwitches on them 24/7.
Its the macro economics that are killing us, not the extra dime a box for oatmeal.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 09:17:24

Its the macro economics that are killing us

Hate to break it to you, sparky, but there’s no such thing.

The economy is the sum total of individual decision making.

The “macro” is just bookkeeping of all the silly decisions the silly sausages made in the past. And so it goes … now, it’s JT-time.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carlos Cisco
2008-04-19 18:03:42

Horsehocky, Felix domesticus. You keep counting the number of breakfast burritos sold in your state and Ill count the number of steel mills shut down and shipped to China where I am; check back with me around year’s end to see who’s got a better grip on the economy.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-19 07:51:26

“We’ve taken quite a clear position on this in saying that a strong dollar is in our nation’s interest”
- Paulson

“The dollar is not money any longer but a handful of paper distributed in the world without commodity support,”
- Ahmadinejad

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-19 08:00:26

Time to invade, I guess. It’s pretty sad when you can only hear truth and honesty from the mouth of the Iranian nutjob. I guess our nutjobs could take some notes. Wake up Paulson, you disgusting mother—–er.

 
Comment by ec3
2008-04-19 08:29:55

I have taken quite a clear position on this in saying a high paying job, a trust fund, paid-off houses in Maui, Telegraph Hill, Brooklyn Heights and Raleigh are in my interest.

 
Comment by SF Mechanist
2008-04-19 09:53:44

“We’ve taken quite a clear position on this in saying that a strong dollar is in our nation’s interest”

Weak dollars is how trade deficits are corrected.

 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-04-19 12:51:27

A weak dollar would benefit us if we actually exported a lot of quality products. American manufactured products are increasingly seen as inferior, and rightly so. Now our financial system is viewed as corrupt and unsafe, and rightly so.

Our best hope is our natural resources, which would be available to sell if we didn’t consume with such ferocity. If we fixed our educational system, we would be able to stay dominant in tech, but we’re losing that too.

We needed a b*tch slap like the mother of all recessions to wake us up to this. It was about time.

 
 
Comment by nhz
2008-04-19 08:00:03

inflation for J6P and deflation for the Wall Street crowd; if you spend just a few 1% of income on food and energy, can avoid most taxes and get a 10-30% pay increase every year, the times are good.

 
Comment by EndOfEmpire
2008-04-19 12:13:20

My diesel is 4.51 and has been above 4 for quite some time here on Maui.

 
Comment by rms
2008-04-19 13:20:25

“It looks gas will hit $4.00 a gallon soon…”

Just paid $3.93/gal this morning, Washington’s Columbia Basin.

Comment by Anthony
2008-04-19 17:18:11

3.99 in Eureka, CA for lowest grade. $4.49 for diesel.

Comment by gather no moss
2008-04-19 19:14:14

$3.47 for regular in Bedford, MA. Everybody was biking today it seemed. (Live near big biketrail.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Carlos Cisco
2008-04-19 20:19:24

$3.19 here in Northern Ohio, but, most around 3.34; $4.09 diesel

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carlos Cisco
2008-04-19 20:22:27

Means a trip down to Florida would be $400 just for gas; I dont think so.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-04-19 05:22:09

blizzard of pink slips:

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Citigroup Inc, Merrill Lynch & Co and Wachovia Corp this week announced 12,400 job cuts, and the number of pink slips is likely to rise as losses mount and the economy works its way out of its malaise.

http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN1827726720080418

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-19 07:24:51

One of the guys at the party is losing his job at JPM. They are shipping it to India. They had to train in their replacements. They are trying to relocate people within the company but the laid off JPM employees have to compete with the influx of Bear people that will be laid off.

Somebody please tell me how the f-ck prices here in Fantasyland are going to remain in the stratosphere. I love a good fairy tale in the morning.

Comment by Michael Fink
2008-04-19 07:30:31

Foreign buyers and retirees, their snapping up Manahattan condos left and right.

:)

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 07:36:44

European buyers, and Asian buyers, and Strawberry Pickers, and Irish Carpenters!!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-19 07:37:12

And the Spanish RE bull looked at the first condo and it was too small. The second was too big. But the third condo was just right.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ec3
2008-04-19 08:46:40

I’m just looking at all of the just-about-completed-almost-except-for-all-the-freaking-little-details -on-the-checkoff-list,-but-money’s-tight-’cause-the-hoped-for-tenents-aren’t-lining-up-around-the-corner-of-the-preview-office condo buildings in Fort Greene, Prospect Heights, 4th/Gowanus, Battery Park, Tribeca, Jersey City, Hoboken. And all the announced and started ones in Crown Heights. And the UES. They’re not small buildings.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 09:00:37

Throw in all the condos on 23rd, and the east side of 57th, and up and down 10th Ave., and all along Broadway on the UWS.

And all the reconversions on the UWS too.

Did I miss anything?

 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-19 09:24:00

The Financial District. Condo-mania.

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 09:29:12

Sorry, forgot that one. I know, your favorite. My bad.

Bad shee-yat in Battery Park City too. Throw in parts adjacent to the Westside Highway too. And all the stuff on the west side of 23rd, and 42nd too.

Crikey!

 
Comment by az_lender
2008-04-19 10:05:47

And the funniest part of it is, they will blame the coming Manhattan RE bust on the layoffs without considering that the RE mania was the root of both.

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 10:16:29

I have “friends” on Wall St. who were cash buyers, and plan to “rent” them out ’cause Manhattan rents “only go up”, and they can “always charge more”.

BWAHAHAHHAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!

 
 
 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2008-04-19 08:42:50

‘One of the guys at the party is losing his job at JPM. They are shipping it to India.’

Look around you. How many people do we work with or mingle can go that route? How much do they actually produce?

 
Comment by MaryLee
2008-04-19 22:04:24

My cut-to-the-chase question is: “How do you buy a Hummer on $8/hr?”

 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-04-19 05:24:27

MOSCOW. April 18 (Interfax) - For the first time, the Central Bank
of Russia purchased gold for its international reserves from gold
producers, a source in banking circles told Interfax.

Previously the Central Bank had always purchased gold on the
interbank market.

http://www.interfax.com/3/386119/news.aspx

Comment by vozworth
2008-04-19 08:09:02

and you thought subsidies were only for Agriculture.

anybody else see it that way? or is this just good monetary policy from the reds?

Comment by vozworth
2008-04-19 12:15:53

everybody getting warmed up for the Foreign currency crisis of aught eight?

I have it on good authority that Immuna B. Real Leary (wife of Markus Sheeple) has a forex trading robot ringing the register for 2000 usd a day…”Computer, can we repair the Berilium sphere?”

Comment by jsocal
2008-04-19 19:35:36

too late but geez I love Galaxy Quest

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-19 20:38:01

its never too late…

nobody ever calls out the voz…….

 
 
 
 
Comment by sd renter
2008-04-19 09:16:23

Here’s a good article about the central banks secretly suppressing the price of gold.

http://www.gata.org/node/6241

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 10:14:26

Whatever.

Those people are like the Heaven’s Gate people. Castrating themselves and waiting to hitch a ride on the nearest gold comet that will be coming any day now.

Are the central banks suppressing the price of silver and platinum too? How about wheat and soybeans? Where does the manipulation stop?

 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-04-19 05:29:17

Honey, I HELOC’d the kids:

On top of which, the continued turmoil in real estate has meant that home equity — a source of security for many families and a fallback for college funds for some of them — is not as easy, or in some cases impossible, to tap.

As a result, many parents are being forced to reconsider what has become a $200,000 question: Is a higher-priced private education really worth what you pay for it?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/19/business/19money.html?ref=business

Comment by Michael Fink
2008-04-19 07:15:38

Figured I would weigh in on this question, because, IMHO, the answer is simple.

The only education that is worth 200K is an Ivy League education in finance, medicine, management, law, and perhaps a few other fields that I am missing.

All other private colleges, imho, and all other fields of study, there’s absolutely NO reason to go anywhere other then a public school. If you’re rich and it doesn’t matter, by all means, send you’re kids where ever they want to go. Otherwise, unless you’re child is studying in the “big money” fields (and at an ivy leage school) I would say there is almost NO cost justification to send a child to a 2nd tier private school (or to send them to Harvard to study art or history).

Comment by are they crazy
2008-04-19 08:43:03

Unless your kid works really hard and gets nice big scholarships. Then the $200K education becomes a $30K education. If I had to pay the whole $200K maybe I would feel differently, but I don’t believe college is supposed to be a high end vocational mill. But what do I know - my kid goes to a college where the biggest event of the year is a croquet match, they have waltz and swing dances on he weekends and they learn only from the great books from throughout history. Will she make big bucks - who knows. Will she get a real education - absolutely.

 
Comment by az_lender
2008-04-19 10:09:36

Michael Fink, when you say there is no reason to send a kid to Harvard to study art or history, you are really saying there is no reason to send a kid to Harvard as an undergraduate. It is indeed an inferior undergraduate school (I’m not kidding), but the degree itself is a Brand that opens more doors than logic would dictate.

Comment by bangkokobserver
2008-04-19 15:17:16

Most IVY League education is simply a process of brand management. For many subjects, there are good state universities that are actually the leaders in ther fields.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by JR
2008-04-19 19:23:30

It’s the connections. Your classmates know people who know people. And have daddies with hiring authority, especially for internships. An English or Art History degree from Harvard is all you need to get started on a super-fast-track in almost any large corporation if that’s what you want. And if you cultivate the network you will never, ever lack for influential friends all around the world.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-04-19 14:11:06

I don’t know about the other fields of study, but I can say with a lot of confidence that a Harvard Med education is not worth the cost over a good solid public school. There is already a shortage of physicians and anyone with reasonably good training and a good work ethic should be able to land a good residency and a competitive job anywhere in the country without saddling themselves with 200-300K in debt.

 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-19 07:34:00

“Mr. Stanyon said he had his fingers crossed that his son might want to attend a state college in New York that costs about $15,000 a year. Instead, Christopher set his sights on Siena, a private college near Albany, that costs nearly $35,000 a year.

“With $15,000, I could take care of that relatively easily,” Mr. Stanyon said. “But now we’re looking at $140,000 to $150,000 for the full four years, which is not something we were prepared for.”

The stupidity is astounding. What the freak does it matter where little Christopher does his undergrad? If he plans on going to law school the only thing that will matter is where he gets his legal degree. These people are baboons.

I love this piece of wisdom. “Ms. Sullivan said, “She’s going into an adult world now, when you start making your own decisions.””
That is not the adult world I know. The adult world I know is to make one stupid decision after another and blame all of your failures on others. This kid will learn that soon enough. She will join the hoards of “victims” roaming our street in traveling bands.

Comment by deeogee
2008-04-19 07:51:57

Tell little Christopher to look into taking out a loan

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-19 08:02:15

The world needs ditch diggers, too.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by auger-inn
2008-04-19 13:34:21

LOL! I love that line (caddy shack)!

 
 
Comment by speedingpullet
2008-04-19 08:11:44

Tell little Christopher that if he wants the $35K a year option rather than the $15k one, he needs to find a job that pays him $20k a year while he’s at school, to make up the difference.

The only ‘vacation’ time I got during my 4-year degree was a) the days between xmas and new year and b) a week off around the easter break.

The rest of the time I was either studying, or working my butt off at a variety of low-paying temporary jobs, to fund myself for the rest of the academic year.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-19 09:00:40

I thought a week in Cancun for Spring Break was written into the Constitution.

 
 
 
Comment by ec3
2008-04-19 08:58:51

Yeah i saw Siena on a resume the other day. I threw it in the garbage because I never heard of the school and because of that certainly didn’t think it was prestigious.

 
Comment by tab
2008-04-19 14:15:23

Who studies pre-law? IMHO - the kid should do a three-quick years at a state school with an easy major like communications and study for the LSAT the whole time. Then he should get into Yale law. His dad is a fool.

P.S. I went to an ivy for undergrad. It was definitely worth it, but most of my tuition was covered by grants and scholarships.

 
 
 
Comment by jdinuc
2008-04-19 05:29:21

“Fraud was rampant in US housing bubble-economist”

“In fact, a big portion of subprime loans in the United States were underpinned by a criminal overestimation of home values, said William Black, Associate Professor of Economics and Law at the University of Missouri, Kansas City.”

http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN1829259220080418

Surely he jests.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-19 07:36:44

“Fraud was a basic feature of the run-up in U.S. housing prices that eventually led to the current crisis and record foreclosures, according to an economist who focuses on white-collar crimes.”

Breaking f-cking news there. Good thing there was an economist to tell me something so obvious. Jack Daniels and Cheerios. Mmmm, mmmm, good.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2008-04-19 08:37:16

“Seventy percent of Stated-income loans exhibited fraudulently inflated appraisals,…”

Lets just call this run-up in housing prices the “crime wave” that it was .
And Congress/Senate wonders why prices are crashing . In light of the fact that people are walking in droves ,after the prices went up beyond reason ,you would of thought that the powers would of investigated the reasons behind this sudden price crash before they enacted bail-out programs .

The housing bubble was a mania that was riddled with fraud and they better send out the police instead of bail out money .

The fraud in the industry created the demand because everybody and their brother wanted to get in on the fake appreciation . Even the crime of lying about your intent with the property creates a false demand .A borrower is cheating when they say they are going to owner occupy when they have no intentions to do so .Those borrowers made it appear that they were applying for a lower risk loan that would normally be charged a higher rate with a higher down payment requirements. We all know the stories about borrowers that bought 5 houses at once ,funneling the 5 different applications to different lenders claiming all were going to be owner-occupied .How about just low down liar loans that drove the market up?
IMHO ,this is a serious matter when you have this degree of loan fraud on every level ,and the remedy is not throwing money at bad loans or trying to beef up fake prices .
The borrowers went for the gambling gusto ,the real estate and loan agents went for the gusto ,and it’s not a pretty picture about what people were willing to do to make money .
It takes more than just a willing greedy borrower for this degree of rampant fraud ,and the real estate industry would have to be in on it ,or simply allow it .
I think the current politicians need to be impeached for their part in this attempt to cover up the true reasons for the demise of the housing prices .All you renters were priced out of the market because of fraud ,and all you people paid higher property taxes because of fraud . How does it make you feel that Senator Dodds and all the other powers want to bail these people and institutions out and use your tax funds to hide a crime wave ? What a joke .

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 10:05:47

“And Congress/Senate wonders why prices are crashing.”

Anyone in a position of power over the financial sector who does not feign surprise at the mortgage crisis may fall under a cloud of suspicion that they are among the culprits who helped create the mess.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Chip
2008-04-19 12:31:31

“‘Why doesn’t the SEC have a chief criminologist? Why doesn’t the Fed?’ he asked.”

Oh, great. Black balaclavas in that office over there at the Fed. Then what? Does the Waffen-HS request that they be brought into the fold? Your papers, please.

 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-04-19 05:32:05

Let the bubble burst:

What has happened to British phlegm? Instead of greeting news of falling house prices and tightening lending with aplomb, people shriek that the sky is falling. Steven Crawshaw, chairman of the Council of Mortgage Lenders, warns that it is “a real possibility … that net lending in 2008 could reach only half last year’s level unless additional funds become available”. Smaller mortgage lenders, dependent on their ability to sell mortage-backed securities, could even be forced out of the market. In sum, the time has come for a bail-out.

I have three answers to this cacophony of special pleading: first, anybody who thinks it is a duty of the state to help keep housing expensive is crazy; second, policymakers should respond only to clear market failures; and, third, with a floating exchange rate and an independent central bank, the UK can weather the storm if it keeps its head.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/68636996-0cad-11dd-86df-0000779fd2ac.html

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-19 07:46:20

“the UK can weather the storm if it keeps its head.”
Depends if it is square rigged or a Porpoise class (submarine).

 
 
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-04-19 05:38:22

good morning

just got back from a business trip to Rhode Island and Mass

the overall mood up there is a downer

very slow and everyone i talked to is saying they are slow

tons of homes and condos for sale

pretty grim scene overall

off to south jersey today for family gathering and expecting more

of the same

but hey the market was up.

tx did you short skf all the way down?

Comment by Michael Fink
2008-04-19 07:29:19

Where are you heading in S. Jersey? That’s my home town area, I grew up in Cumberland county. Just wondering; definately let me know what the area’s looking like. There was quite a bit of new development when I was last there, but, compared the S. FL, the prices were laughable (cheap).

No need to short SKF, just go long UYG. SKF is an inverse fund, so, (not an expert here, so feel free to correct), shorting SKF is a bet that the financial markets are going to go higher (a bad bet IMHO).

I sold all my LEH45 May calls and UYG shares yesterday. Waiting for the next pullback before I get back in; but not brave enough to go long SKF (which would make money on both sides, UYG makes money on the up, SKF on the down).

Comment by mgnyc99
2008-04-19 09:14:43

heading to Marlboro jersey in Monmouth county to my sisters place. and my in laws sold thier place in Freehold last year
to go where? Florida -yes i did warn them but they think i am a loon in regards to housing and my insistance on being a “renter”

they live in some retirement place in Summerfield fla

the last time i was in jersey there were so many open house signs there were fighting each other for space with their stupid signs

i will take some photos if i encounter the same scenario today

 
 
 
Comment by MD_Renter
2008-04-19 05:45:33

California and DC people - would you…

move from DC area to Silicon valley for work, with about a 20% raise

OR

stay in the DC area?

(I have no experience with California).

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-04-19 07:18:34

Try to get a great job in Atlanta.

Comment by MD_Renter
2008-04-19 07:22:48

Yeah… I wish…

 
 
Comment by anon in DC
2008-04-19 07:53:27

Would the 20% cover the cost difference in CA ? It might depending on your salary level. The money aside is the job better ? More secure, more responsibility, more long term opportunity, more interesting ? Or if a lateral move do you want to live in CA ? I would not mind returning.

Comment by MD_Renter
2008-04-19 07:56:54

The 20% would make it about a wash in terms of cost of living, except for potential housing (first time buyers). More secure and more long-term opportunity for one member of a couple. Unclear yet in terms of other member’s career opportunities. Farther from family but not really close here either.

 
 
Comment by JR
2008-04-19 08:21:03

Don’t move from DC to SV just for the 20% raise - this isn’t enough to compensate for the drop in standard of living in the Bay Area. The biggest difference, IMO, between DC and the Bay Area is the quality of rental properties in the 1500-1800/mo range. You really have to see for yourself what kind of rental that range gets you out here in SV - and determine whether you are willing to take that hit.

Comment by Bloz
2008-04-19 08:29:23

> the quality of rental properties in the 1500-1800/mo range

might get you a 2 bdrm dump.

 
 
Comment by sm_landlord
2008-04-19 09:31:47

If you have no experience with California, you should at least take a trip out to SV and have a look around. Be prepared to pay up if you want housing in one of the best areas. The real question is: 20% raise over what? You need to get a salary that is well above median for the area in order to live reasonably well and still be able to save any money. I wouldn’t consider living in SV on a salary of less than $120K single or $200K household, and that would not be enough to live well.

Also check out traffic and transportation options. Some of the commutes in the area are pretty bad, so you would want to make sure you could live close to your employment.

 
Comment by SF Mechanist
2008-04-19 10:25:49

Bay Area has better beer. When I was in DC a few months back, I walked into a bar. I asked: “What microbrews do you have.” Bartender said: “What?” I said: “Microbrews, which ones do you have?” Bartender said: “Oh, you mean whiskey?” Me: “No! Microbrews!” Bartender: “huh?”

So I pointed at something on tap, Liberty Ale, or something like that. it tasted like piss! We in California are spoiled.

Comment by SF Mechanist
2008-04-19 10:31:06

I have to admit though… DC had better looking women…

 
Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-04-19 12:45:16

shoots, even Utarrr has microbrews…

 
Comment by rms
2008-04-19 13:42:02

“Bay Area has better beer.”

The Portland area has a better selection!

 
 
Comment by David Cooper
2008-04-19 16:43:24

“move from DC area to Silicon valley for work, with about a 20% raise” Tony Bennett didn’t sing “I left my heart in DC”, there is a reason the Silicon Valley has high house prices. Take One night in San Fran overlooking the Golden Gate bridge, and then make your decision

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-20 05:43:48

If the darn expulsions of the salmon crashing sea lions dont keep you awake ;)

 
 
 
Comment by spike66
2008-04-19 05:52:37

California’s Unemployment Hits 6.2%, worse than Penn. and Ohio, and third worst in the country.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-caljobs19apr19,0,5944269.story

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 06:02:07

The graphic showing YOY job growth shows that the last time this dipped below negative in SD, around mid-1991, was after the official end of the last U.S. recession (which ended in March 1991). Nonetheless, YOY job growth remained negative in every subsequent period until late 1993. If the same pattern played out this time, we would be talking about labor market recovery some time after 2010. I don’t mean to suggest this has anything to do with the SD County housing market…

Jobless rate increases in S.D. County
Area feels pinch of declining housing market
By Dean Calbreath
STAFF WRITER
April 19, 2008

For the first time in 15 years, San Diego County suffered a year-to-year decline in jobs last month, as the regional economy continued to feel the effects of the declining housing market.

(Graphic: County job growth)

Between March 2007 and March 2008, local employers cut 1,700 jobs from their payrolls, according to data released yesterday by the California Employment Development Department. Unemployment last month surged to 5.3 percent, up from 5.0 percent in February and 4.2 percent in March 2007.

 
Comment by OCBear
2008-04-19 06:07:27

I see Vacant Retail, Commercial & Industrial properties everywhere in my little myopic world of Anaheim Hills and Orange. I work my shop almost every Saturday, out of the 30 or so business’s on our street maybe 3 to 5 are working, where as 10+ were working every Saturday last Summer.
The talk on the kids Soccer field has progressed from Housing to Inflation, now Employment is on the table.
Is that a Recession I smell over the hill, or is it a full blown Depression Landfill. We should know by Fall.

Comment by ex-nnvmtgbrkr
2008-04-19 07:49:47

Dude, you’re hangin’ in my old stompin’ grounds. I’m an East Orange boy, born and raised…..and after 29 years I finally got out. Thank god!

 
Comment by Robin
2008-04-19 21:52:02

Noticeable increase in OC vacancies, especially in the smaller strip malls. However, the major malls are showing some weakness as well. Brea Mall and South Coast Plaza included.

 
 
Comment by SDGreg
2008-04-19 06:10:04

“The governor’s efforts could help save construction jobs by shifting carpenters and other journeymen from residential developments to public works projects, said Michael Bernick, a former Employment Development Department director and research fellow with the Milken Institute in Los Angeles.”

This could be useful at the national level to address longstanding infrastructure needs and keep people working, but instead we’ve decided to borrow money and send out checks. Yes, there would likely be borrowing to address the infrastructure needs, but at least that would be borrowing for legitimate investment versus borrowing for consumption.

Comment by CA renter
2008-04-20 02:51:26

Agree 100%.

The stimulus checks are a way of funneling money from the govt to the banks (as J6 pays off his loans. Totally MHO.

 
 
Comment by johnfromia
2008-04-19 06:27:12

Here’s a twofer from BusinessWeek online.

The Other Orange County:
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/apr2008/db20080415_242666.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index_top+story

Slideshow: The Real (Foreclosed) Homes of Orange County:
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/08/04/0417_orangecounty/index_01.htm

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 07:55:58

From the article: You could pick one up for as much as 40% off market value. But don’t try to be too cheap. Banks rarely accept offers below the opening bid.

BWAHAHAHHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!

Those Garage Mahals are going to be crashing down. Just look at the pics. They set a new definition of fugly. Not even a mother could love them.

 
Comment by yogurt
2008-04-19 08:50:13

You could pick one up for as much as 40% off market value.

Well no, you’ll pick it up for market value.

And this is from Business Week?

Comment by Marcus
2008-04-19 09:22:27

Thank you.
My RE agent told me that the house I was looking at won’t drop any further because it is already listed below market value. My brain hurts.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Darrell in PHX
2008-04-19 06:37:47

” ‘A lot of companies are in shutdown mode right now, not to mention that it’s competitive fighting everyone else who’s getting laid off,’ Rodriguez, 25, said during a fruitless visit to a state jobs office on Wilshire Boulevard near downtown Los Angeles. ‘I should be making money and spending it on entertainment, but I haven’t been able to enjoy myself at all.’ He’s now living with his parents and feeling helpless.”

Not that he should be paying rent to his parents or saving for a rental of his own. Not that he should be paying off his education/getting an education. Not that he should be paying his cost of living or saving a down payment to buy some time…..

No. The guy is worried about making money so he an spend it on entertainment.

Comment by veloblues
2008-04-19 07:38:13

Honestly, at 25 all I thought about was beer and women. Oh–and bicycles.

Comment by speedingpullet
2008-04-19 16:32:30

Me too.
Except substitute ‘men’ for ‘women’.

Never did get my dream Bianchi 753 frame with Shimano components… :-(

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-04-19 07:39:43

It feels like I’ve been tweaking since Jan 2nd.
This roiling market of nasty news and unbearable heights has left me unable to entertain myself let alone relax.
How do you guys really relax?
Shopping used to calm me but now I get this crazy sadness when I check the prices.
What comes after nine eleven?

Comment by Bub Diddley
2008-04-19 10:19:07

Following the current crisis is my entertainment. It’s like watching a slow-motion trainwreck. Reading financial news has totally replaced listening to records and watching kung fu movies as a source of yuks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-19 07:09:56

And the CityBoy is already getting pi$$ed off. Things like this infuriate me:

“Tightfisted consumers have made life difficult for John Rodriguez. Two months ago, he lost his job at a furniture warehouse store that closed because of a lack of customers.”

Why can’t they write that as, “increasingly responsible citizens have caused an economic reordering that continues to clear out excessive business activity”? Of course that would not allow for all the world to consider themselves a victim. Great nations are never made up of victims.

Comment by measton
2008-04-19 08:17:26

Because they are not responsible they just don’t have access to $$$.

 
Comment by FutureExpat
2008-04-19 10:11:12

“Great nations are never made up of victims.”
—-
NYCB, I love your anger.

 
 
Comment by robmypro
2008-04-19 10:05:20

It was always going to end in tears.

 
 
Comment by bizarroworld
2008-04-19 05:57:16

Home sales tumble in the Rochester region
http://tinyurl.com/5gklhh

Buyers with blemished credit who could have qualified for mortgages two years ago can’t obtain loans today, said Pat Hastings, associate broker at Nothnagle Realtors’ Chili office, who noted that the spring home-buying season is off to a much slower start than usual.
“Foot traffic is lighter. The market isn’t doing what it usually is doing in spring,” he said.

On a more optimistic note, the number of purchase offers accepted on existing homes, an indicator of future home-buying activity, fell only 5 percent in March, to 841, or 45 fewer than last March.

I have a feeling that many of those purchase offers won’t equate to getting a loan. And this is in a supposedly non-bubbly area.

Comment by Muggy
2008-04-19 07:21:27

Rochester is immune. There’s this company in Henrietta that makes some laser thingy that is going to hire 2 people this year.

They’ll need housing.

Comment by Muggy
2008-04-19 07:27:11

Also, excess inventory is literally burning off.

Comment by implosion
2008-04-19 09:52:21

or, ablatively driven implosion.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by bizarroworld
2008-04-19 11:12:27

Of course they will only hire those two people if the state and county give them 10 million in tax breaks, which they will do. :)

Comment by Muggy
2008-04-19 13:35:19

“Of course they will only hire those two people if the state and county give them 10 million in tax breaks, which they will do.”

Yes, and to be considered for the job you must personally know one or more of the following:

1. a member on the Wegman family
2. a member of the Wilmot family
3. someone that lives on East Ave.
4. a state trooper
5. a judge from Pittsford
6. a doctor from Brighton

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by bizarroworld
2008-04-19 15:33:37

Muggy, you can probably add someone who knows Tom Galisano, Maggie Brooks, Bob Duffy, or Louise Slaughter. Forget that job if you are a republican from the city or a democrat from the burbs.

 
Comment by Muggy
2008-04-19 18:01:12

I regularly served Golisano when I was a teenager working concessions at the movie theater. I know he’s human, but it’s always funny to ask a millionaire if they’d like buttery-flavored topping on their popcorn.

“Forget that job if you are a republican from the city or a democrat from the burbs.”

Excellent insight. Bizarro for mayor!!

 
 
 
 
Comment by exeter
2008-04-19 08:10:50

Bizzaro…. that was a quick trip from the fantasy “there was no bubble here, therefore sales and prices won’t fall” to the hard grim reality we’ve forecasted on this blog. I contend the denial in upstate is far more insidious than the more notorious areas.

Enjoy the schadenfreude brother.

Comment by bizarroworld
2008-04-19 13:19:46

You’ve got that right, exeter. The wakeup call has been made to upstate NY, but most are sleeping through reality and still dreaming in fantasyland. A friend of mine is a real estate agent (a decent soul who is getting out of the cutthroat business because she is too honest and caring for the clueless) and she has a client who wants to put an offer on a house, but the fools don’t have a mortgage pre-approval, they ate up all their savings due to a layoff, so they can’t put any money down! I told her to stop taking to the morons until they at least get a pre-approval. Why take the time to show them homes when they likely won’t be able to get a zero down mortgage.

When the real estate community starts crying the blues, then they are having a hard time believing their own sales stats crap.

While I take no joy from the deteriorating situation, I do enjoy the schadenfreude. As with most here, I was looked at as an absolute fool for telling people that real estate was going to take a big hit even in good ol’ upstate NY. As I heard and read over and over again “we didn’t have a bubble, so we will be just fine.”

Ben and the posters on this blog have helped me keep my some of my sanity.

Comment by exeter
2008-04-19 14:32:15

I believe the ongoing decline in upstate will be far more painful for those folks than in other areas. Anything to avoid a return to the slow, painful macro trend of economic decline. Anything… fantasy or real… so long as they don’t have to go into rewind mode.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by spike66
2008-04-19 05:59:25

Wall Street Braces For Thousands of Pink Slips…
Posted this late yesterday, but along with more layoffs on Wall Street,
commercial and regional banks estimated to lose 100-150k jobs nationwide.

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/business/business-wallstreet-layoffs.html

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 06:05:33

Libor’s Rise May Sock Many Borrowers
By Carrick Mollenkamp, Serena Ng, Laurence Norman and James R. Hagerty
Word Count: 747

A sharp and unexpected rise in a widely used interest rate is threatening to add billions of dollars to the interest bills of homeowners, companies and other borrowers around the world.

The London interbank offered rate jumped for the second straight day Friday — two days after the British Bankers’ Association, which oversees the calculation of the interest rate, said it was investigating the borrowing rates that banks had been providing to it.

Comment by exeter
2008-04-19 06:11:17

UK bankers have 350 years experience extracting the last drop of blood, sweat and tears of debt/wage slaves.

I’m shopping a rate for a decent sized CD thats coming due in July. As I talk to the local bankers, there is one common theme; don’t go long on CD’s, the yields will be going up.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 07:26:00

Good insight. My hunch is the same advice (stay short in duration) applies to the bond market?

 
Comment by nhz
2008-04-19 08:11:44

same here in Europe: two weeks ago I suddenly received notice from the bank that they increased the rate on my deposit account by 0.7%. That should have come as a warning, normally they only raise rates when you tighten the screws on them, and usually drop rates without telling you. A few days later Eurostat reported that EU inflation is now 3.6%, effectively erasing all the interest that the banks provide on savings accounts. I think the banks were happy to lock in some more customers before rates went up. Officially inflation in fantasyland ‘the Netherlands’ is just 1.8%, so there is no reason why Dutch banks should offer higher rates …

 
Comment by Kim
2008-04-19 08:48:55

In my area the money market accounts are paying higher interest than anything but a 4 year CD. That can’t last long.

Comment by Chip
2008-04-19 12:53:25

Same here in FL: currently 3.28 and 3.44 on a couple of jumbos, which has been discouraging. Very happy to see LIBOR rise while I fence-sit.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by robmypro
2008-04-19 10:03:01

This Libor scandal is interesting. They are claiming that the reason the Libor rate was fudged was so banks wouldn’t have to report their true cost of borrowing. But since Libor is used to price derivatives as well, I wonder if they were all gaming the system to help stop the damage from their derivative holdings. It wouldn’t surprise me.

In any case, rates tied to mortgages, business loans, cars, etc. are going to go up as another market manipulation fails.

Comment by nhz
2008-04-19 10:41:19

yes, there might be some fallout down the road; if the manipulation made Libor artifically low, it is likely to get artificially high for some time to compensate. Mortgages in some of the worst bubble markets like Spain and UK are tightly linked to the Libor rate (not in the Netherlands though …).

 
 
 
Comment by polly
2008-04-19 06:07:10

Does anyone know what the break down is of outstanding ARMs between old style classic adjustible rates that just go up and down based on LIBOR (or some other index) plus something and the new style ARMs that start out with a teaser rate and then adjust upward for quite a while, though the exact amount may be a little less if LIBOR (or some other index) is going down? There must some of the old style stuff out there, but I have to believe that most of the new stuff is in the suicide style….

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 06:27:12

It’s very very complicated.

I tried once to write an Excel-style spreadsheet for the mess, and before long I was on the floor, rocking back and forth, whimpering like a wounded puppy.

Here’s the “executive summary” (which is technically wrong but essential in all its details, I hasten to say, before I get Taser-ed by someone.)

You have a teaser rate (A) for the first 3 months, and let us say, your payments are P1. After that, there is a typically a rate reset (B) for the remaining portion of 5 years (57 months.)

However, what is really happening is that even though you need to pay P2 to fully amortize, you still have the “teaser payment” P1.

So what happens to the difference (P2 - P1) each month? It gets added back onto the loan balance which brings us to the dirty fact that P2 is not actually fixed but going up each month. The owner doesn’t feel “shocked” even though they are in fact getting tasered.

Now, some of the loans, you have an option of paying less than (P2 - P1), in which case, you guessed it, that gets added back onto your loan balance.

Now, in the good case, you come up on 5 years, and there’s some loan balance, and you get to pay the full amortization at rate C for the next 30 years.

The bad case is you hit the “edge conditions” which is called a recast. Generally, when you hit 130% LTV of the “original balance” (or some such.)

The problem is that the media uses reset and recast interchangeably but they are, in fact, different beasts.

Has your head exploded yet?

The recast can occur at any time depending on the “edge condition”, and your loan resets immediately to the full amortizing payment at rate D for 30 years.

In addition, there may be rate caps for B, C and D, in which case, what happens to the difference in payments? You guessed it. It goes back onto the principal.

Who needs a drink at 9am? I know I do. :-D

Comment by polly
2008-04-19 08:18:02

Thanks. That is very interesting. OK, I’m a geek, but it is. And I get the difference between reset and recast. But my question was a lot less sophisticated.

My understanding is that back in the old days there were fixed rate and adjustable rate mortgages and then the other weird stuff that almost nobody used. I assume that as all sorts of people were guided into exotics that these plain vanilla adjustable rate fully amortizing mortgages still existed just like plain vanilla fixed rate fully amortizing mortages still existed - but they weren’t offered to too many people because the fees on them were lower. What I wonder is what proportion of the ARMs out there are of the plain vanilla type? And what proportion of the recent vintage ARMs (maybe last 5 years) are that type?

Why? My parents listen to Bob Brinker and he keeps telling them that everything is going to be fine because LIBOR is going down and that will fix all the ARMS. Well, never mind the investigation of fraud in the LIBOR rate reporting, lower indexes only provide significant help for a plain vanilla ARM. One with a teaser rate is going to explode no matter what. It might explode just a tiny bit less with lower index rates, but not enough to help a lot.

But I like the explanation of how the weird ones work. How could anyone decide to sign a piece of paper describing a mortgage mechanism that complicated. Even if they read it, it was too “mathy” for most people to understand. I don’t get signing things you don’t understand. I don’t get it at all.

Comment by combotechie
2008-04-19 09:20:47

“I don’t get signing things you don’t understand. I don’t get it at all.”

You don’t need to understand, you only need to get your name on the dotted line; Everything else will take care of itself.
Because real estate always goes up the most urgent and important thing for you to do is to ride the trend. The trend is your friend, and, my friend, house prices will forever go up, up, up.
Prices will go up with you or without you so stop with the endless questions already and just sign the papers else you’ll remain stuck a bitter renter forever.

Sheesh.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Carlos Cisco
2008-04-19 18:41:18

“…..Your job is to close!!! Get them to sign on the line that is dotted…….”

 
 
 
 
Comment by NotInMontana
2008-04-19 06:47:48

Funny, the original ARMs seemed scary back in the 1980s and those were reasonable rates that ended up working pretty well at the time. I’m still not sure I’d go even for a nontoxic ARM.

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-19 07:55:28

Clearly (according to the radio at least), the time to get an ARM is during a period of historically low interest rates.

Comment by NotInMontana
2008-04-19 15:18:51

At the time rates had been high but were slowly coming down. I bought my first place in 1990 at 12% and refi’d about 1994 at 7%.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2008-04-19 06:09:06
Comment by Muggy
2008-04-19 06:18:08

Why is it that none of the “finance reporters” understand market value? It looked like that dude’s head was going to asplode when Schiff explained tuition.

“Peter, I don’t understand. If college is too expensive for kids, who is going to lend them the money? Bernanke, print these flunkees some loot for their kegger!”

Comment by Muggy
2008-04-19 06:21:09

BTW, I graduated in 2000, and I still have friends deferring payback. Yeah, I can see why private student loans aren’t performing. These are the same people that should be buying houses. You can’t cram anymore credit into late Gen X and Gen Y, especially the “lifelong learners.”

I have many friends getting “professional” degrees. They should have just been nurses and mechanics.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 06:36:19

Most degrees only “pay” for themselves when someone else is picking up the tab.

Whether that’s the taxpayer in the form of the NSF, or the taxpayer in the form of state rebates, or the taxpayer in the form of property taxes is largely irrelevant.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Michael Fink
2008-04-19 07:36:42

Yup, I would agree with that statement as well. A degree in some fields is just a waste of time, and will NEVER pay for itself. IMHO, college, for most people, is a place that you go to get a better paying job. Why on earth people study fields that are historically terrible payers is beyond me. Thank god that they do, but it’s still a losing bet. (Full disclosure, I have a degree in comp sci, and am still bitter about the awful, difficult, non-English, esoteric, 60% drop rate classes that I had to pass to get said degree. My friend went for history, and had a wonderful time, breezing through his classes and partying the days away.. And yes, I am still bitter, even though I have a great job in my field… :)..

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 07:43:34

‘Most degrees only “pay” for themselves when someone else is picking up the tab.’

Medical schools are heavily subsidized as well, while the number of entrants is rationed by quantity, not price (something Milton Friedman’s dissertation brought to light, I believe) — something to think about when you are wondering why doctors are so overpaid.

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 08:06:02

Well, after you’ve lived in a country with unlicensed doctors, come back and talk to me.

I’ll take this system, warts and all.

Friedman’s theories are all good and dandy but you don’t want your cancer to be healed with flashy gemstones either.

And if you believe that the sheeple can tell the distinction between science and scientology, well, you have a higher opinion of humankind than I do.

 
Comment by ACH
2008-04-19 18:09:55

“And if you believe that the sheeple can tell the distinction between science and scientology, well, you have a higher opinion of humankind than I do.”
They can’t. I refer you to the idiocy about evolution and “intelligent design”.
BTW, I majored in physics. I should have majored in Medical Physics, but no matter, I like this even though I make less than a burger flipper.
Roidy

 
Comment by bobo
2008-04-20 08:53:52

The training and education that our doctors get is very good, but I think Prof Bear was referring to putting artificial caps on the numbers they let in. When I was looking at applying, these schools had spaces for 100-200 spots and thousands upon thousands applying. I never understood why the news would talk about shortages of doctors while they cranked out so few… I knew quite a few brainiacs who didn’t get in and then pursued other careers. There is truly a limitation of supply of doctors kept in check by the medical board/groups that accredit schools and testing. They could easily increase the number of doctors, but I imagine the doctors today enjoy their high salaries and prestige. Do ER docs really need to work 80 hours and 3 straight day shifts? Should it really take weeks to get an appointment with the doc?

 
 
 
Comment by SDGreg
2008-04-19 06:32:53

Also from Peter Schiff on Friday:

http://tinyurl.com/3hojfz

“The same mathematics will come into play for our ridiculously expensive higher education system, which can not exist without a well lubricated loan infrastructure. Limit the ability of students to take on heavy loans, and college education becomes untouchable for anyone but the wealthiest Americans. If loans dry up, universities will be forced to slash their bureaucracies and substantially reduce tuition. Ironically the silver lining here is that with low tuition, students will no longer need the loans that kept tuition so high in the first place.”

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 06:25:26

That is an excellent and powerful statement about the taxing effect of running the Fed’s printing press on American household wealth. My only doubt about what he said is that he implicitly suggests the Fed’s money printing strategy will continue to play out into the indefinite future. Personally, I believe dollar debasement is not a sustainable policy, and will reach a breaking point sooner rather than later without a change of course, which currently seems rather like the Titanic steering straight into an iceberg.

Comment by Muggy
2008-04-19 06:30:15

“like the Titanic steering straight into an iceberg”

Bear, I hate to nitpick, but some hypothesize that the Titanic would have stayed afloat if it had not veered and instead rammed the iceberg head-on.

I’m just sayin’… Lol

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 06:33:12

I was just speaking metaphorically, but are you suggesting that perhaps it would be better for the Fed to stay the course?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Muggy
2008-04-19 06:42:42

“are you suggesting that perhaps it would be better for the Fed to stay the course?”

Not at all. I think the result will be all the same: a bunch of crusty steel at the bottom of the ocean regardless the course.

 
Comment by IllinoisBob
2008-04-19 07:01:46

Fed Officials May Be Nearing Rate Pause as Inflation Quickens

April 19 (Bloomberg) — Federal Reserve policy makers, sensing both renewed inflation dangers and a possible economic boost from government rebate checks, may be nearing a pause in interest-rate cuts after the fastest reductions in two decades.

Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser said the federal funds rate is already low enough to support growth, while Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher said that he’s hesitant to lower rates further and warned against “inflating” the economy out of the credit crisis. Both men voted against last month’s 0.75 percentage point rate cut.

Richmond Fed President Jeffrey Lacker, who dissented four times in 2006 in favor of higher rates, said April 17 that he’s “uncomfortable” waiting for a contraction in the U.S. economy to bring down inflation.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=adJIM71hYaxo&refer=home

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 07:47:34

“Fed Officials May Be Nearing Rate Pause as Inflation Quickens”

Hinting they may be nearing a pause is a cheap trick for fooling the markets into a larger-than-expected pop on the next rate cut. Fools are always surprised by the resolution of wildly divergent MSM pronouncements made by various Fed mouthpieces in the runup to each FOMC meeting.

 
 
Comment by matt
2008-04-19 06:40:06

Judging the fed comments, they are about to change course. Is a .25 hike the next move? The easing cycle is at an end.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 06:45:07

Please, nobody believes this, not even the Greenspan defendants.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 06:46:29

They are getting close to 0 pct nominal FFR, which would appear to place a lower bound on potential easing. But considering the possibility of negative real interest rates facilitated through “higher-than-expected” inflation, I don’t see why they are necessarily anywhere near done with their stealth taxation of wealth from the hands of those holding $US-denominated IOUs.

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 06:51:25

You can always “print” money to buy long-term T-bonds, and lower rates to zero.

That would be literal printing, also referred to as quantitative easing.

But the dollar would collapse then.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 07:39:43

quantitative easing

Are you suggesting this is how the lid is kept tightly on l-t T-bond yields against “higher-than-expected” inflation, or are you just mentioning a hypothetical?

I had been thinking it was dangling the scepter of a “worse-than-expected” recession over bond market participant’s heads that kept them going long…

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 07:51:28

Future possibility not present fact.

Unfortunately, it shows up on the balance sheet if you know where to look.

If they make the balance sheet private, you’ll know what to do as well as anybody else. Not terribly likely though.

 
Comment by matt
2008-04-19 07:59:37

I think no ease at the april meet, not priced in the market yet. There has to be a debate at the fed about the wisdom of driving rates this low. Maybe a .25 hike set for june.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 09:18:27

“I think no ease at the april meet, not priced in the market yet.”

I don’t think they are as eager to crash the stock market as you think they are. But perhaps they have other means of ensuring the stock market always goes up besides lower FFR?

 
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-19 16:24:25

best you can plan for is a pause, slight equity pullback, massive commodity pullback, bond market meltdow, and housing crash continues un-abated.
or,
banking on a quarter point cut, slight commodity pullback, bond market bi-polar behavior, and equities rally with tax refunds and stimulus checks. housing crash continues unabated except save the function of capital formation for distressed asset purchases.

FED sticksave on commodity bubble, throws a football to the morgage pigs hiding from the monkeys who are herding elephants out of the room…dude, where’s my rug?

 
 
 
Comment by Darrell in PHX
2008-04-19 06:49:29

My problem with what he said is that the global economy will be fine. Europe’s housing bubble will pop. Britain’s is.

How can Asia’s export based economies survive when their customers are forced to stop buying?

Comment by Big Bubble Popper
2008-04-19 08:49:02

Darrell, I agree. Right now things look better outside the US, but that is only temporary. Europe’s bubble will pop, and based on what nhz has said I think it will be much bigger than our bubble.

Of course Asia’s export based economies can’t survive when their customers can’t buy anymore. On top of that China and India have their own bubbles. The only place we can say for sure that doesn’t have a bubble in Asia is Japan.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by nhz
2008-04-19 10:50:06

yes, I think the EU (and Asian) property bubbles are far bigger than the US bubble. But due to less overbuilding and far more government interference compared to the US, these bubbles will have more time to deflate; so it is difficult to say how it will work out for the real economy.

Realtors are happy to mention the Europeans who are buying up American real estate, especially near the coasts(it’s even mentioned in our newspapers now). But when the tide shifts, maybe in 5-10 years time the US economy is gaining steam again while the EU economies are in deep problems because of their collapsed bubbles. Maybe Americans (and Asians, with their accelerating economy) get their chance to buy up Europe if they are patient …

 
Comment by Chip
2008-04-19 13:01:20

NHZ - if it happens like last time, we’ll just buy our own stuff back at a steep loss for the foreign investors.

Ask any Japanese if he’d like to invest in a U.S. golf course.

 
Comment by nhz
2008-04-19 13:15:42

Chip: yes, that’s what I thought too.

And if Wall Street is still in charge of the money/mortgage markets by then, Americans will be able to leverage up again with their increased home equity and buy up Europe for pennies on the dollar ;-)

 
Comment by bangkokobserver
2008-04-19 15:26:17

In Bangkok, people are saying the Taiwanese will take up all the slack for the enormous number of new apartments that are coming on line, another variation of “the foreigner will save us”. Asia’s in denial about how much of its boom is credit driven right now. Expect a replay of 1997 in the Thai property market. Overpriced Phuket beach property should come down signficantly.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 06:11:55

Less decoupling, more beta…

The stock market is a leading indicator of real business activity, as the smart money leaves the market before the widely-apparent evidence of a slowdown materializes.

China Stocks, Once Frothy, Fall by Half In Six Months
By James T. Areddy in Shanghai and Craig Karmin in New York
Word Count: 1,398 | Companies Featured in This Article: PetroChina, Ping An Insurance (Group), China Petroleum & Chemical

The sharp decline in Chinese stocks is approaching a milestone: With a 4% drop Friday, the market has fallen by nearly half since its peak last fall. The decline has wiped out nearly $2.5 trillion of wealth and is testing the government’s apparent resolve to let the market find equilibrium on its own.

The plunge has slashed the savings of millions of Chinese investors who jumped into the market as it rose six-fold in two years. It is crimping expansion in the country’s nascent financial sector and may put a squeeze in corporate coffers. But so far, it has not slowed the world’s fastest-growing major economy.

Comment by Kim
2008-04-19 09:01:29

And yet the FXP is down…

Comment by vozworth
2008-04-19 21:16:32

the Shanghai at these levels is a CRASH…how can you make money shorting with FXP?

I simply do not understand this thinking.

 
 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-19 09:22:49

Did you notice how this massive drop occurred just after the stories materialized that regular Chinese were begging, borrowing and stealing to get money in the stock market. Cho6pack got in and took it right between the cheeks. The little guy loses, in all languages. The greedy little guy, that is.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-20 00:11:58

“Cho6pack got in and took it right between the cheeks.”

Which cheeks? (Sorry, butt I had to assk.)

 
 
Comment by Frank Hague
2008-04-19 09:23:13

http://tinyurl.com/42hyw8

More on decoupling or lack thereof.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 06:16:27

Kitsch-and-sink rally…

Relieved investors stimulate big rally
Upbeat earnings reports revive confidence levels
By Tim Paradis
ASSOCIATED PRESS

NEW YORK – Wall Street topped off a strong week with a big rally yesterday, after results from companies such as Citigroup and Google helped ease investor anxiety about the health of corporate profits. Investors have been worried that recent data indicate a slowing economy, which would cut into profit growth at some of the nation’s biggest companies.

 
Comment by Darrell in PHX
2008-04-19 06:26:43

How out of touch is the MSM?

Today Show just ran a segment on finding affordable hotel for your summer vacation…. The cheapest room they ran was “Starting at $199 a night”.

Since when is $250 a night affordable?

I hope those hotels paid a lot of money to be features in a “news” story.

Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-04-19 06:48:41

I can’t wait for youth hostels to become popular again. Those things (if run correctly) apparently can turn quite the profit.

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 07:00:23

They are just “selling a lifestyle”, and that worked in the magic fantasy fairytale world of HELOC’s and Goldilocks but it seems to have disappeared. :-D

Comment by in Colorado
2008-04-19 14:55:57

Testify! I am always amazed at the number of middle class people who stay at Disney’s expensive hotels in Orlando and Anaheim. I’m talking $400 a night rooms. That should be changing soon.

Comment by Darrell in PHX
2008-04-19 15:40:12

I’m heading to Disneyland next weekend. Grand Californian is like $400 a night, for a room without a view. Like $500 for theme park view.

NUTS!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2008-04-20 03:18:40

Darrell,

If you didn’t already make reservations, I highly recommend this Sheraton with free shuttle ride back and forth.

Looks like they have a deal for $455 that includes two adult tickets for two days, free breakfast, free parking, free shuttle and the hotel. Might be worth a look.

They had the largest and best rooms we’ve ever stayed in, and the prices are very good for what you get, IMHO.

Have a great trip!

http://www.starwoodhotels.com/sheraton/property/overview/index.html?propertyID=995

 
 
Comment by JR
2008-04-19 19:53:14

I like this place:
http://www.whitehousehotelofny.com
I’m not kidding. Friendly and cheap former flophouse, cubicles for about $30 a night.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 06:38:25

Financial CEOs See Recession on the Way
By CONOR DOUGHERTY
April 19, 2008; Page A6

Chief executive officers in the financial-services industry think the economy is in or will soon be in a recession, but they believe the Federal Reserve is handling the credit turmoil fairly well.

The Financial Services Forum, a group of 20 CEOs of financial-services companies doing business in the U.S., Friday released a survey that shows chief executives are increasingly pessimistic about the economy’s prospects.

Respondents on average placed the likelihood of a U.S. recession at 88%. One in three put it at 100% and several believe the United States is already in a recession that started sometime in the first quarter.

Comment by nhz
2008-04-19 13:17:26

nice that the US now has a Google economy instead of a financial economy; on the internet everything IS different :)

 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2008-04-19 06:53:32

I’d like to see if we can agree on what constitutes the “end of the game” in the baseball analogy that’s popular here, i.e., “we’re still in the third inning,” etc.

Is it the end of YOY median declines, or the first increase in YOY median prices, or the recovery all the way back to peak bubble prices? Is it tied to foreclosure volume? Remember, there are always foreclosures, even in an economic boom. Is it overall sales volume? Is it some combination of these factors? Oh, and what areas of the country do you think will pull out of their tailspin first?

What say ye?

Comment by Michael Fink
2008-04-19 07:10:19

End of the game for me is when price/rent and price/median income return to historic norms. I don’t really care about the appreciation of the homes returning to a postive number, or the actual dollar value of the home. Once the historic norms are back in I will start to think about stepping up to buy. If I can buy with 20% down and then turn around and rent the home out cash flow positive, that’s the bottom in my book.

Will/could prices fall further? Absolutely, in fact, they probably will. But, again, my investments are in INVESTMENTS, not in my home. I want a place to live, and when the rent/own ratios start to turn normal (or even positive, cheaper to own then rent) that’s when, for me, it will make sense to buy.

What areas will pull out first? My guess would be the areas that have seen the least building and least out migration. Unfortunately, that’s not an easy place to define.. Shooting from the hip, I would guess small, out of the way towns across the country with little/no building boom and a stable population.

The places that we all talk about all the time (FL, TX, CA, NYC) are toast, they have such a deep decline to endure that they will certainly NOT be the first places to start to recover. There’s just WAY too much inventory in all these areas, it will take much longer for them to reach bottom.

 
Comment by ozajh
2008-04-19 07:14:36

This would be a good weekend thread topic.

IMHO, to remove possible outliers, when the nominal YOY median has increased for 3 consecutive months in a market, then that market has reached the end of the actual ‘bust’ phase.

When the REAL YOY median (accepting there are issues with CPI measurement; I would use headline rather than “core”) has increased for 3 consecutive months in a market, then the recovery in that market has commenced.

If a market is covered by Case-Shiller, then I would use that metric rather than the median.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2008-04-19 06:59:33

Florida unemployment article. Seems even lawyers are having a hard time finding jobs. Nothing like a dollop of sweet schadenfreude in your morning coffee.

http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20080419/BUSINESS/804190361/1661

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-04-19 08:22:59

I know of five people here in SD who own multiple properties who never had incomes.
It is sickening that people bought homes to fix up and sell for profit.
Seriously, none of these people have money, yet somehow purchased and heloced their way into building an empire.
Anybody know people like my friends?

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 09:47:38

My landlord is like your friends. And now Senators Dudd, Barney Frankfurter and others are working hard to provide $300 bn in taxpayer guarantees to help make sure the flipper fools brigade does not get collectively foreclosed.

The arguments that this bailout from on high might violate the sanctity of private contracts or create a terrible moral hazard precedent seem to have been drowned out by the politicians’ promises to “do something.”

Greasing the frozen wheels of the mortgage market may have the unintended consequence of accelerating the crash in progress. Potential knifecatchers, take heed.

Momentum builds for foreclosure relief

Key players have gotten behind the idea of government backing for mortgages, and the pressure to act will likely yield a compromise. Key factors: Who’ll be eligible and how much risk should taxpayers assume?

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Congress isn’t done debating how best to stem the foreclosure crisis, but one near-certainty has emerged: Lawmakers will pull together a housing bill that expands Washington’s role in helping troubled borrowers.

Key legislators, Bush administration officials, banking regulators and the presidential candidates have lined up behind the idea of letting the Federal Housing Administration back new loans for homeowners at risk of foreclosure.

Several plans have been proposed. All of them would let the FHA insure mortgages for troubled borrowers whose lenders voluntarily write down loans to an affordable level. Once refinanced, the loans could be sold to investors, which in turn could grease the wheels of the mortgage market as a whole.

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-04-19 11:09:15

In a way I wish something worse could happen to America so the pols could worry about it and forget bailing flippers.

Let’s see: food shortages, oil embargos, layoffs, divorces,
frozen bodies, heat stroke, burning gas stations, big rig shut downs, airline scuttle, NO summer driving season, no holiday shopping, no teenage mall rats, no equity, mud cakes and today’s great idea, margin call on homes.

I used to be carefree. I was fun to be with but now Im cranky.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by bangkokobserver
2008-04-19 15:29:14

The way to win the next election is to stand against foreclosure relief. Even in the NYTimes the comments on the editorial pages are running about 90% against.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2008-04-20 03:38:57

I’ve seen it written in various places, and some have mentioned even on CNBC that those opposed to bailouts outnumber the pro-bailout crowd 9:1.

Agree that any politician who gets the balls to oppose bailouts would have a very high chance of winning.

We’re almost single-issue on this one, and will not vote for anyone who favors bailouts.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 07:02:02

Old word with new meaning:

SUBLIMATE: v, the process by which assets considered solid evaporate without first passing through a liquid phrase. “Oh, no. My stock in Bear Stearns just sublimated.”

from a letter to the Economist by John Baumeister of Edmonds,
Washington.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 07:27:05

“My Enron stock sublimated several years ago, but my Bear Stearns stock only recently subprimated.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 07:34:57

New Era business model:

1) Retain executive talent through stock options and other incentive-based pay tied to company stock price;

2) Use special financial vehicles and other accounting gimmicks to produce a stream of earnings that always go up;

3) Rely on analyst reports that “earnings always go up” to drive the stock price through the roof;

4) The moment clouds appear on the horizon, top managers and other insiders cash out their stock shares in droves;

5) Greater fools who bought shares on the belief that earnings will always go up subsequently learn they have been subprimated through accounting gimmicks that hid bad news off balance sheet.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 08:03:08

This is just the modern version of how it’s always been.

Anybody who seems to think otherwise should go down to their public library, and read a few books on 18th century finance, or 19th, or 20th, or here’s a radical thought, 21st too.

WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 09:10:29

My question:

Was the period between 1935-1987 or so the exception to banking business as usual? Safeguards such as Glass-Steagall (which, I believe, drew a firewall between retail and investment banking) were recently torn down, with seemingly-predictable consequences.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-19 09:27:06

Not really.

Just because YOU’VE forgotten the “-tronics” bubble, and the Nifty Fifty, and the Biotech bubble doesn’t mean everyone else has.

Boonton Electronics? Geophysics Corp? ZZZZ Best?

Oh, and Minnie Pearl, let’s not forget that bee-yatch, or as you might possibly remember it’s “real name”, Performance Systems?

Don’t let survivorship bias hit your @ss on the way out!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 09:59:52

“Nifty Fifty”

Not forgotten, but what does that have to do with Glass-Steagall, which was in effect throughout the 70s and the runup that preceded the Nifty-Fifty meltdown in 73-74?

Repeal of the Act

On November 12, 1999, President Bill Clinton signed into law the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. One of the effects of the repeal was to allow commercial and investment banks to
consolidate. Several economists and analysts have criticized the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act as contributing to the 2007 subprime mortgage financial crisis.

 
 
 
 
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-19 09:57:12

Capital Sublimary Inlfation (CSI): The process of identifying non-liquid equity evaporations while passing through the virtual capital markets.. “short term gains from buying the panic”….:

Dude, i just got some sweet BSC CSI, PBR ME ASAP.

Comment by vozworth
2008-04-19 20:57:01

nobody ever calls me out.

UBS has written off more of the bullshit than anyone else, and the race to 40 is on.

I called 40 dollar UBS calls in the money a month or three ago.

 
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-19 21:04:30

ya cant get much more bearish than out of the money calls goin in the money…on UBS. I call it the melt-up strategy. Oh you mean the long strategy on SKF is UBS at 40?

yes…I mean those asshats have been more aggresive in the writedowns. Thats the bull case for kistch and sink….they continue to lead out.

 
 
 
Comment by mikey
2008-04-19 07:52:21

Yesterday I posted posted that the second largest bank in Wisconsin, Associated Bank in Greenbay took a hit on $19.5 million uncollectable bad loan debts and increased it’s reserves.
Things are tightening up in the economy, housing and evidently the loan collection game.

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=740831

Last night, I noticed this post on craigslist sponsored by an area RE Group for a “National Speaker” event.

“William Tingle from sub2deals.com is coming to Appleton on May 15th. The Fox Valley Real Estate Group is putting this event on for free for those that attend. Should be an excellent meeting. For more info please visit our site at foxvalleyrealestategroup.com and go to our meeting agenda page.”

“Five months after I bought that first sub2 house, I left my full time job for good. Being a full-time investor lets me enjoy life like never before and I thank God every day for making sure I was awake that morning at 2am to see Carleton Sheets.”

“Where Will You Be in 5 Years?”

Sheesh…The areas primary bank is sucking wind, the RE agents are eating tree bark and joe6p is hurting and the RE bloodsuckers bring in a Charleton Sheets Disciple to jumpstart the local economy

Meet their boy Bill Tingle
http://sub2deals.com/

I bet the event will be packed with “investors” that don’t enjoy their day jobs.

When will they EVER learn ? :)

 
Comment by nhz
2008-04-19 08:03:37

Dutch bubble update:

after strong pressure from Dutch financial and political authorities the IMF is ‘reconsidering’ its report that placed the Netherlands at the number 2 spot of overvalued housing markets worldwide. The Dutch Ministry of Truth (CBS) has calculated that Dutch homeprices are 0% overvalued at this moment. The median Dutch home costs 8.5x median income, and Dutch homeprices surged at least 600% while incomes increased just 50-70% in the last 15 years or so.

Rest assured: according to the experts this is all normal. Even the country near the top of the housingbubblelist is not overvalued at all, so there is NO housing bubble anywhere in the world. People in Spain and Ireland who sold recently should buy back before they are priced out forever! And even the US did not have a housing bubble according to the Dutch experts, it was all just a subprime problem that has little to do with the healthy housing market.

On another note, yesterday a big financial company publicly advised investors to keep investing in Dutch (private) real estate because ‘experience has shown that over many years home prices only go up and never go down’. In Netherlands that is true if you only look at the last 20 years or so; denial is getting stronger every day here.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 09:00:38

“after strong pressure from Dutch financial and political authorities the IMF is ‘reconsidering’ its report that placed the Netherlands at the number 2 spot of overvalued housing markets worldwide.”

When in doubt, lie!

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-19 09:33:17

I’m confused. They wanted to be #1? ;)

Comment by nhz
2008-04-19 10:43:41

good point :)

yes, a missed opportunity - they should have argued that they deserve the nr. 1 spot because RE in Netherlands only goes up and the IMF list (almost) proves it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-04-19 08:31:36

Tips for selling in a buyers market.

“5. Bite your tongue: If a potential buyer comes in with an offer you consider too low, resist the urge to turn up your nose, Blakeslee says. After all, it takes a considerable amount of paperwork to make a formal offer, so even a low bid signals interest. “You need to respond–even though you are indignant and insulted,” Blakeslee says. “Do a serious counteroffer. You have nothing to lose by countering, everything to lose by rejecting it out of hand.”

 
Comment by roguevalleygirl
2008-04-19 08:46:20

I tried posting this earlier today under the wrong username and it didn’t get thru. I’ll try again.

Americans are filling their tanks with corn. Haitian women are feeding their families—MUD CAKES!!! They are protesting the skyrocketing price of—MUD!!! The MUD has to be trucked in with trucks filling their tanks with—CORN!!! I know Haitian trucks probably don’t use ethanol, but gas is basically fungible.
Something is wrong—EVERYWHERE!!!
http://www.intentblog.com/archives/2008/04/eating_mud_cake.html

 
Comment by dimedropped (Orlando)
2008-04-19 09:13:06

Dang this is getting interesting. I feel like I am living the “300″. Now how did that end?

 
Comment by ec3
2008-04-19 09:15:39

Do-gooders in Jamaica Plain are massing to save the properties of their landlords, and the properties of the would-be landlords who had visions of sticking it to the very people who are massing out of a misplaced sense of community activism to save their landlords’ investments (is it the pharmaceuticals these youngsters are put on?):

http://www.boston.com/realestate/news/blogs/renow/2008/04/in_the_presence.html

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-19 09:34:08

There are some very thoughtful letters regarding The Maestro’s tenure at the Fed. Here is one of my favorites:

“Events often did not proceed as we anticipated,” states Alan Greenspan, “but that resulted from a lack of foresight, not from a flawed decision-making process.”

As students of Greek tragedy would be quick to point out, foresight includes anticipating the future consequences of one’s actions. If an individual or group fails to look ahead, its decision-making process will inevitably be flawed. Nor can dissociating the two exempt one from blame for the tragic results.

Stephen Bertman, Ph.D.
Professor Emeritus of Classics
The University of Windsor
Windsor, Ontario

 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2008-04-19 11:05:57

Things like this used to bother me for no reason other than envy. I think they are standard news items nowadays in a world of Brittney and Soros:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080419/ts_nm/britain_wine_dc

Comment by Left LA Behind
2008-04-19 17:23:42

I am blessed with a mid-range wine palette. I won’t drink hooch, but the Aussie/Chileans in the $7 - $15 range are all I need.

 
 
Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-04-19 13:10:24

I wrote my landlady a letter telling her I was looking for a place in Colo. The house I’m in is furnished, but I’d like to go back over there for the summer. Offered to help her find another renter since she’s out of state. She has the house listed with a realtor, has been for sale for some time, one showing since I got here 7 months ago. She’s declaring bankruptcy.

Got a letter today saying to let her know when I’m leaving, she’s not going to rent it any more, she’ll come and get her furniture.

Any ideas what she might be thinking? Maybe just letting it go? I know she has payments on it and is barely making them, if at all. No way to check anything, since Utah doesn’t have public records regarding housing.

Comment by Jean S
2008-04-19 13:57:24

sounds like jingle mail to me…

 
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-19 16:30:38

Is that in Squatterville, Utah?

Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-04-19 17:54:19

I may become a squatter myself if I stay in this house…

 
 
 
Comment by takingbets
2008-04-19 16:04:12

very good maps and graphs in the link below showing quarterly delinquency rates in the US.

http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/retro-HOMELOAN07.html

 
Comment by takingbets
2008-04-19 16:30:27

an old article from april 4th. sorry if its a double post.

The Housing Bust: a Statistical Portrait
April 04, 2008 12:13 PM ET | Rick Newman | Permanent Link

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/flowchart/2008/4/4/the-housing-bust-a-statistical-portrait.html?s_cid=yf:the-housing-bust-a-statistical-portrait

Comment by vozworth
2008-04-19 20:51:52

Statistical Bust..

the gears of the global financial industrial complex will continue, unabated.

Paying your debts, building and servicing things, investing, saving, and doing good works never goes away. The recovery story is very cloudy.

Clouded by Cultural Conservatism, sound investing, good strategy, and strong ethical behavior as it relates to the good.

Fair competition never goes away. The global financial complex actually lowers the playing field.

How low should the participants have to digress for normalcy to manifest? The things that are normal are what is so.

 
 
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-19 21:14:00

UBS
40
2 weeks

quarter point cut, commodity sell off, dollar rally, bi-polar bonds, very little news other than Obama wraps up DEMS. the bull case for equities has been made. Strong hands are the only buyers, weak hands are the sellers.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-20 00:17:11

Treasury sell-off hits housing recovery hopes
By Michael Mackenzie and Saskia Scholtes in New York and Krishna Guha in Washington
Published: April 18 2008 23:16 | Last updated: April 18 2008 23:16

US mortgage rates soared this week after a dramatic sell-off in the Treasury market that hit housing sector recovery hopes even as it suggested investors were growing more confident in the medium-term US economic outlook.

The yield on the 10-year Treasury rose as high as 3.85 per cent on Friday from less than 3.50 per cent last week as investors sold bonds on expectations that the Federal Reserve could soon end its rate-cutting cycle.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post