April 24, 2008

Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For April 24, 2008

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

421 Comments »

Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-04-24 03:37:41

Steven Pearlstein (Washington Post Columnist) on the New Austerity:

“…things won’t be “fixed” simply by having the financial sector write off its losses and bad loans and promise to do a better job next time with risk management. Rather, it will require a reduction in the overall standard of living in the United States so that the country as a whole begins to live within its means.

What does that mean exactly?

Such a broad reduction in wealth and living standards will take many forms. It will come in the form of higher unemployment and stagnant wages and falling income, which take statistical form in slower or even negative economic growth. It will come in the form of inflation and its first cousin, a lower value for the dollar. And it will manifest itself in lower values for pension funds, 401(k) accounts, university endowments and house prices.”

The Bottom Is Up Ahead-The Washington Post

Comment by Tim
2008-04-24 05:25:28

The guy is a moron as he is assuming continued building. We already have more than enough housing right now. Of course it will be fixed when prices fall enough so the existing stock is within ppl’s means and makes financial sense. It will not be an easy road to normality, but it certainly cure the current ailment. If we let the markets work, the lenders will once again monitor whether are not ppl will are living within their means and not extend credit if they are not.

Comment by Tim
2008-04-24 05:43:23

Im summary, ppl can preach all they want about what ppl should do and how they should conduct their lives. To me it is no different than trying to teach calculus to a dog. The common man will always try to get away with what he can. Rather than trying to do the impossible (i.e., change mindsets) we need to let markets work and when a bubble is obvious such as in housing since 1999 the regulators need to find the root of the problem and deflate it. The safeguarding of information and failing to address obvious problems got us into this mess. Only accurate information and appropriate and enforced regulations will get us out. Maybe this is what he meant (i.e., that the market will force the change), but I see so much written about how others should change how they live their lives that it is a sore point with me.

Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-04-24 06:02:19

I don’t think that the regulators had the political capital to “deflate” the bubble…the bubbles deflate on their own.

What they should have done was not make the bubble worse by singing the praises of loose lending and ignoring obvious Ponzi schemes. Just having common sense and enforcing current laws would have been enough.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mole Man
2008-04-24 07:03:35

Singing praises has no relevance. When a new finance product is available that enables people to get ahead, the market piles on in force. Alternative products with lesser returns do not compete, they simply stop selling. As with monopolies this is an area where markets benefit from reasonable regulation. Bogus appraisals and thoroughly toxic loans should never be offered to anyone because they end in tears for the market as a whole, not just the customers who get taken or the financial engineers who walk away with their pounds of flesh.

 
Comment by Bronco
2008-04-24 07:37:03

exactly

 
Comment by Tim
2008-04-24 08:00:25

The could have done so without telling ppl that’s what they were doing (i.e., Greenspan should have not kept rates so low for so long, 100% or greater LTV loans and no due diligence loans should have been abolished, etc.). Obviously, they can’t say they are attempting to deflate a housing bubble. Rather, they need to address the causes intelligently.

 
 
Comment by VirginiaTechDan
2008-04-24 06:19:49

what makes you so sure that regulators are smart enough to “control” the market? Every regulation as an equal and opposite unexpected consequence. The only “regulation” we need is for individuals to bear the risks for their own foolishness.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Tim
2008-04-24 07:04:09

Regulation includes such simple things as not keeping interest rates artifically low in the face of an obvious housing bubble, not allowing 100% LTV, and requiring some form of due diligence in making loans. It doesnt have to be complicated.

 
Comment by Moman
2008-04-24 07:06:49

Yes!

No bailout for speculators.

 
Comment by Mole Man
2008-04-24 07:08:33

What makes you so sure that this is about regulators being smart enough to control markets? There is evidence that simply requiring appraisals to be disclosed improves their quality. How is this kind of disclosure inconsistent with your perceived need for individuals to bear the risks of their own foolishness? If this were just about individuals then things would not be so bad, but as you will find over the next few years what has happened is that individuals acting collectively have messed things up for our whole society. That is when regulations start to matter. Why exactly is it that bogus appraisals and toxic lending is so valuable to you? Can you really show where this kind of thing helps society at any level? Markets back in the day before regulations were terribly chaotic, so your whole argument appears to be ignorant of the history of capital and debt markets.

 
Comment by Carlos Cisco
2008-04-24 07:15:35

Control the market? Like Wiley Coyote strapping on the Acme Automatic Parachute, you just know that this is going to end badly. But, like like the cartoon, we’re powerless to do no more than watch for the effects of flame, explosion and the law of gravity to take over.
Supermarket, yesterday, everyone had rice in their cart. Young couple ahead of me at checkout, two cartloads of food, four credit/debit cards, all rejected. Said they’d be back, soon. Checkout lady’s comment to employee wheeling away the carts ” Yeah, like they got 200 in cash laying around at home….put it all back.”

 
Comment by Austrian School
2008-04-24 09:04:22

The root regulation, the one that forces the creation of so many more regulations, was attempting to a have certain interest rates set by the Fed. Without a Fed, the market would set its own interest rate, and I can tell you that it wouldn’t have set a rate so low for so long as the Fed did.

You don’t have to tell lenders to have rules not to loan money to bad risks. This is common sense not to want to loose money.

Artificially setting interest rates creates periods of time of non-sensical investment like we’ve experienced recently.

Back in the day they didn’t have the wild excesses that all this regulation has created. Its easy to understand this because we are in the middle of the worlds single largest credit correction event.

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2008-04-24 09:16:01

Precisely: the purpose of the Fed is to blow speculative Bubbles via interest rate manipulation so that the rich can get richer. That’s all it does, and the latest response proves it: the rich lose some money, Bubbles Ben Bernanke drops rates so that the rich can grow richer while the rest of the world faces food shortages and skyrocketing energy prices. But the Fed doesn’t care, so there you go.

Without the Fed, there are still Bubbles, but the flaw in giving power to a group of people who have no interest in using it for good should be obvious by now. People worship the Fed as if they will “fix” the economy, when they have no interest in doing so - they LIKE Bubbles. Bubbles make their pals rich, and Bubbles keep the masses distracted. Take a look at the Fed now: they aren’t fixing anything, but they are blowing another Bubble (commodities, etc.)

 
Comment by exeter
2008-04-24 09:19:45

yeah. You’re right. Regulations and laws never work so lets just rescind them all.

riiiiiiight.

 
Comment by bluprint
2008-04-24 10:41:35

Nah, we should just pile on ever more layers of regulators. Regulators for regulators for regulators. Eventually we will get it right, everything will be safe all the time and we get more jobs to boot. Just need some o’ them thar tax revenues to pay for it. That stuff comes in like water.

 
Comment by exeter
2008-04-24 12:06:24

Right on bluprint.

 
 
Comment by bluprint
2008-04-24 07:05:03

The regulators themselves were the source of the problem. Who regulates the regulators?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Max
2008-04-24 09:28:57

You do.

 
 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2008-04-24 09:09:06

“…but I see so much written about how others should change how they live their lives that it is a sore point with me.”

Me as well. It seems that we should “just get used to:” Renting forever if we’re responsible, bailing out idiots, letting crooks walk away with billions, and living in a rapidly deteriorating society. And why should we just accept all this? Yeesh…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by James
2008-04-24 12:18:54

Somewhat agree here. However, people remember that they got burned really bad by going in to debt. Many people died during the GD. A lot of scarred adults walked away from that and lived differently. They did so for a long time.

If you look at the history of architecture you can see it. 20s you have art deco buildings and large houses. 30s nothing. 40s wartime. 50s more modest housing.

A lot of this housing will become worthless. You can see areas that became slums all over the east coast with great big houses on the lots.

Personally, I’ve really thought and re-though my housing needs. If I do buy its going to be paid off in 10 years. I’m working tword zero debt rapidly. I want a smaller house with a modest yard. Maybe even a townhouse so no yard work.

I’ve cut back on lots of unhealthy things…
1) don’t go out to eat
2) There are plenty of free leisure activities
3) bike to work… saves $$$ AND good for the enviroment
4) Spend more time examining quality of purchases

So, my estimation of my needs has changed greatly.

My big luxury is my DSL line. I love her.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by hd74man
2008-04-24 13:38:59

RE: My big luxury is my DSL line. I love her.

And just think!

She won’t hit you up for alimony, the house, and dog in divorce court-saints be praised!

 
 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 05:26:07

But not to worry. People like Sam Zell and other Richie Rich types are locked and loaded to bottom fish and do it all over again.

Comment by spike66
2008-04-24 06:31:00

True, but other major players are not in such happy shape. Macklowe has lost a couple of billion, trying to best Zell, and has lost the 7 buildings he bought at the top of the market, but also some of his marquee properties, like the GM building, that he’s trying to flog to pay off his debts to Deutsche Bank. Macklowe who only put 50m of his own money in a highly leveraged bet is still the biggest FB going.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 06:48:49

Bitter =

The aftertaste of real estate investment

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 10:14:10

Unless you have the sheer,dumb luck to get out of it at the height of the crazyness…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by bicoastal
2008-04-24 08:19:21

Good article. I always find Pearlstein very sensible. But there will be a lot of pain before Americans are forced to start living within their means. Link if anyone is interested:

http://tinyurl.com/5zhxeq

Comment by Tim
2008-04-24 08:40:07

Thanks. I read the entire article and actually it wasnt that bad. I had to get up at 5:00 am today and as soon as i read about living within one’s means I reacted (as forcing one to live within one’s means makes sense, whereas expecting one to is questionable). In the exerpt provided, it appeared that he didnt understand the link between the write-downs and the consequences thereof clearly, as in my mind the mental leap he talks about is actually painfully obvious. I may have misjudged him based on my reading of the entire piece.

 
 
Comment by hd74man
2008-04-24 13:32:27

RE: It will come in the form of higher unemployment and stagnant wages and falling income, which take statistical form in slower or even negative economic growth. It will come in the form of inflation and its first cousin, a lower value for the dollar.

Say adios to tourist based economies.

In northern New England, that, and health care for retirees and welfare recipients is all there is.

The death spiral continues.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2008-04-24 03:38:16

Bank Failures…. The number of regional banks on the ‘watch’ list is growing.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a547eb54-10cf-11dd-b8d6-0000779fd2ac.html

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 05:53:05

I’m organizing a mass 10k bank run*, all over the country…

*A minimum level of fiscal fitness is required, in order to participate.

Comment by jbunniii
2008-04-24 07:12:37

“Ohio’s Fifth Third bank said profits fell 19 per cent to $292m…”

This is surely the worst-named bank in America, and deserves to fail on that merit alone.

Comment by oxide
2008-04-24 07:32:41

Wikipedia:

Fifth Third’s unusual name is the result of the June 1, 1908 merger of two banks, The Fifth National Bank and The Third National Bank, to become The Fifth Third National Bank of Cincinnati.[5] Because the merger took place during a period when prohibitionist ideas were gaining popularity, it was believed that “Fifth Third” was better than “Third Fifth,” which could be construed as a reference to three “fifths” of alcohol.[6] The name went through several changes over the years, until on March 24, 1969, the name was changed to Fifth Third Bank.

“Three-Fifths Bank” would have a racial undertone as well. I’m glad they avoided it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Max
2008-04-24 09:32:51

Why didn’t they just name it the Eighth Bank?

 
Comment by packman
2008-04-24 09:52:37

No that would be 1/8. This one is 5/3. Thus the proper name would be the “One-point-six-seven bank”

 
 
Comment by Moman
2008-04-24 07:41:27

53 has started a major expansion push in Florida, their branches are all over the place. Come to think of it, so has WaMu.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 07:56:12

Banks & churches tend to have similar sounding names…

 
 
Comment by CincyDad
2008-04-24 09:42:59

Fifth Third bank, hq here in wonderful Cincinnati, is actually a very conservative bank, especially when it comes to residential home loans. They never offered option ARMs. I suspect that much of their loan origination was the standard 30yr fixed that remained popular around here. If they have a large mortgage exposure, it is probably due to HELOCs and FL lending. I suspect Fifth-Third will survive just fine, after some declines in income. (note: I do not personally bank with them.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Blano
2008-04-24 03:42:31

The college student loan bubble continues to pop.

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080424/NEWS05/804240378

Comment by vmlinux
2008-04-24 05:10:45

That’s not the student loan bubble popping, that’s the Communist Republic of Michigan’s budget popping.

Comment by Blano
2008-04-24 05:22:55

I think most states have programs like this, but I know what you mean.

Comment by Bad Andy
2008-04-24 06:34:17

“I think most states have programs like this, but I know what you mean.”

I like to blame Michigan. They are in so much financial mess that the cost to attend a public university is exceeding the cost to attend a private one. Why is this?

Public universities aren’t designed to break even or be responsible with their money.

Private universities must be at least cash flow neutral. Some are even for profit. They can educate for less because they are responsible with their money.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-04-24 07:25:11

They can educate for less because they are responsible with their money.

Hah. There are plenty of bloated private universities and colleges out there. They’ll feel the hit soon enough at the marginal institutions — even some of the elite schools are going to trim budgets and administrative fat.

 
 
 
Comment by spike66
2008-04-24 06:37:14

Naw, it’s those fiscal conservatives in the White House…Bush admin is proposing that the federal gov’t. buy billions in student loans, announced by Margaret Spellings, Edeucation Chief.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/washington/23loans.html

 
Comment by spike66
2008-04-24 06:39:03

Naw, it’s those fiscal conservatives in the White House. The Bush admin is proposing to buy billions in student loans, to keep the money flowing, per Margaret Spellings, Education Chief.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/washington/23loans.html

Comment by SFC
2008-04-24 07:36:12

Check out today’s Wall Street Journal, page A12. This was totally driven by the democrats in Congress, who passed a law last September that put the whole student loan apperatus in chaos. The bailout proposal is from the same group that caused the mess. Bush should tell them no way.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Ed G
2008-04-24 06:08:29

I have for a long time believed the only reason that college prices were so outrageous is because of all the cheap federal loan money being thrown out there. College is overpriced and in most cases a scam. I went to a state university, paid $4500 a year total (paid by working at a local gas station part time), and got out of school debt-free. Most kids are getting out of school with close to 100K in unsecured debt around their necks, money which instead if they saved could have been 20%+ on a house, instead of all these no-money-down loans out there.

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 06:17:50

That’s for just a bachelors in many cases. My Wife has a friend with over 100K in loans who’s never even finished school.

Comment by Moman
2008-04-24 07:13:59

The universities love these students.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by hd74man
2008-04-24 13:42:37

RE: My Wife has a friend with over 100K in loans who’s never even finished school.

Beantown Glob ran a story awhile back about a 59YO divorcee who took out $100k to go to law school.

Never got a law related job…

BK!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2008-04-24 14:21:43

There is a reason so many of these people became realtors and mortgage brokers. For many of them, after being discarded by Corp America, it was the only way to survive. Now they won’t even have that.

 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2008-04-24 08:01:54

I have for a long time believed the only reason that college prices were so outrageous is because of all the cheap federal loan money being thrown out there.

This could be applied to prices in general. Prices are becoming outrageous because Mastercard makes it possible for people to pay them. This, I am convinced, is why so many of us can no longer pay cash for everything like our parents did.

Comment by In Colorado
2008-04-24 14:24:31

I have promised myself that I won’t buy an HDTV unless its a cash transaction (non credit card). Unfortunately there are expenses right now with higher priority at the time (i.e. I just bought some new tires for both cars), which is OK, as the current TV works just fine.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 09:11:18

me too! Didn’t owe a dime.

 
 
Comment by bluprint
2008-04-24 07:09:37

I just heard on NPR this morning that the state of arkansas is loaning a buttload of money to whatever group/agency is responsible for giving loans to students in Arkansas because the group is having trouble selling bonds to finance the loans.

Comment by Tango in Uniform
2008-04-24 09:06:52

Not just Michigan and Arkansas, it’s happening everywhere

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2008-04-24 09:21:18

Wow… they are loaning money to a group giving loans… to people who probably won’t be able to pay them off…

Hey, can I just loan myself money, count the interest as profit, and then bury the loan in Level 3 accounting? What a way to make money!

 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 10:18:17

Probably the Arkansas Rural Endowment, it loans huge amounts of money due to obvious reasons in AR.

Comment by bluprint
2008-04-24 10:38:37

I don’t think so. The name was indicative of an organization specifically for providing student loans. Like “The Arkansas Student Loan Givers” or something like that.

Anyway, as I said the reason it needed the cash was that the group claimed the current economic condition made it difficult to sell bonds to raise capital.

My thought was why not just sell them at a higher yield? I don’t know what is a typical methodology for how bonds are actually sold. Are they auctioned typically or in a case like this would the organization just price the bonds at a price it thinks represents market and offer them to investment companies? If it’s the latter, then just like selling real estate, it’s the price stupid. Lower the price and the bond will sell.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-24 04:54:21

NASCAR is by far my favorite event to attend in person. The CityBoy has his redneck side. Of course I like Jeff Gordon but I have never once rooted for him at a track. One time my wife said, “we have to get you a Jeff Gordon shirt” for a race we were going to. I asked her if she had a death wish for me. I’m not tough enough to root publicly for Gordon.

You will see a lot of god’s mistakes at the track.

Comment by mgnyc99
2008-04-24 04:59:29

nascar huh?

 
Comment by QinQueens
2008-04-24 05:09:53

I can’t agree. I was subjected to stock cars over and over again at the Freeport race track growing up. How many times can you watch people go in circles?!

Comment by Olympiagal
2008-04-24 08:19:00

‘How many times can you watch people go in circles?!’

I watch them do it. All. Day. Long.
And they’re not even in cars.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2008-04-24 08:27:25

Isn’t that what we’ve been doing with these banks for 3 years?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 05:10:19

I can’t believe you’d admit that in public.

Please enlighten me as to the entertainment value of watching a bunch of pituitary cases driving cars endlessly in a circle.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-24 05:27:32

Nascar is an event. Take away the food, alcohol, beautiful clear day, tailgating and redneck watching and you aren’t left with much. But with all of those things it is a good time.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-04-24 05:45:12

nyc did you ever have a mullet?

 
Comment by Blano
2008-04-24 05:49:00

Agreed….I’d like to do it, once.

 
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-24 05:54:14

“nyc did you ever have a mullet?”

Nope.

 
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2008-04-24 06:31:00

You mean “Nope”, or “Hmmm…. not yet… hmmm…” as you stroke the back of your head? :-)

 
Comment by jsocal
2008-04-24 10:36:56

Many years ago, my boyfriend wanted to see the Independence Day 500 so I yawned and brought along about ten magazines.
Never touched one.

 
 
Comment by ACH
2008-04-24 08:04:03

Txchick,
You need to find your inner redneck.
Roidy

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Blano
2008-04-24 05:25:30

One of my favorite pictures is of an unopened can of beer thrown by a fan bouncing off Gordon’s car after he won Talladega.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-24 05:32:28

That is great. I like Gordon because the rednecks hate him so much.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blano
2008-04-24 05:52:36

Yeah, I have relatives like that. They CAN’T STAND Gordon. I’ve marveled at the level of venom towards him, especially if their fave is Junior.

Just ’cause you’re not a good ol’ boy who talks funny doesn’t mean you can’t be a good driver.

Isn’t Gordon from New York??

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-24 06:02:10

New York City!
Next you will say he occasionally wins when they have to turn right!

 
Comment by Blano
2008-04-24 06:17:18

It’s the one time in life when right is wrong. :)

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 07:07:39

Left is right, in Nascar.

 
Comment by Moman
2008-04-24 07:17:49

They only hate Gordon because he is educated and articulated…..not the typical foul-mouthed, Skoal chewing, Bud driking, truck driving, trailer owning redneck thing.

 
Comment by Gulfstream-sitter
2008-04-24 09:26:12

You say that like it’s a bad thing………:)

 
 
 
Comment by Sleeper
2008-04-24 05:55:45

Bahhh, Cars also turn right you know. I’ll take F1 over Nascar any day thanks all the same but thats just too U-ro-peein for the knuckle dragers in this country ;-)

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-24 06:18:20

Pretty elitist for a guy that can’t even spell “draggers”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by samk
2008-04-24 06:39:40

NASCAR is boring on television. Not even HD broadcast can help the ’sport’ overcome its mind-numbing nature. I’m sure it’s more fun when you’re at the track.

As far as racing is concerned I prefer the WRC.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by bluprint
2008-04-24 07:15:36

Nascar has road tracks also. They don’t seem to be as popular as the circular tracks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by phillygal
2008-04-24 07:59:48

come on you know the Euros are coming over to the dark side… first NASCAR lets Toyota in, now look out here come the Spaniards

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by SteveH
2008-04-24 08:09:36

With you there, Sleeper, even though you can’t spell ‘dragger’. If you get the chance see an F1 race in person. You would be amazed and awed to see how quickly the cars go around corners when they pull 4g laterally. I used to race smaller formula, FF, F2000, and Atlantic, in my youth and have never gotten it out of my blood.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Sleeper
2008-04-24 09:51:24

I’ve done a lot of ‘weekend Warrior’ HPDE events in both a spec modified Miata and 93 civic with a 2 liter engine transplant which I built myself, yeah yeah yeah, dont start ;) I’ve been to VIR, Road Atlanta, Watkins Glenn and Sebring and I’ve been adicted to turns since watching my first Long Beach Grand Prix as a child. Nascar? Whats nascar? LOL

Oh, and I’m better at driving then spelling ;)

 
 
Comment by Sleeper
2008-04-24 09:55:33

I’ve done a lot of ‘weekend Warrior’ HPDE events in both a spec modified Miata and 93 civic with a 2 liter engine transplant which I built myself, yeah yeah yeah, dont start ;) I’ve been to VIR, Road Atlanta, Watkins Glenn and Seebring and I’ve been addicted to turns since watching my first Long Beach Grand Prix as a child. Nascar? Whats nascar? LOL

I will miss the end of the oil age :(

Oh, and I’m better at driving then spelling ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2008-04-24 11:06:56

I had the opportunity to drive a retired F-1 for a corporate outing (for $, you can do just about anything). Those guys get my respect. Those cars are controlled explosions on wheels.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by LA Wallflower
2008-04-24 12:55:38

So’s my motorcycle. And it only cost $8K.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by phillygal
2008-04-24 07:52:47

I’m a NASCAR viewer by injection.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 08:04:10

Fool-injection?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by phillygal
2008-04-24 08:44:48

meat

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-24 08:54:08

I was thinking of substituting fool by sausage but then my mind seems to work in strange ways. :-D

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 09:13:13

my eyes!

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-04-24 09:17:40

Your eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the …? :-D

 
Comment by phillygal
2008-04-24 10:25:57

…and a prime cut of beef it is…wink wink

 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 10:57:36

Cue the scene in “Young Frankenstein” with Peter Boyle and Madeline Kahn… :)

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 11:36:24

Soylent Green, is people.

 
 
 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 05:57:48

Nascar races are around 200 to 500 miles…

I expect them to continue for the booboise’s benefit, but limited to around 100 miles of left turns, as the gas situation goes critical.

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-24 06:22:58

Next the Indianapolis 500 will be cancelled due to the unavailability of gasoline. Or worse, they’ll go “bio fuel” on us.

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-24 06:25:55

(g,d,r)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by SteveH
2008-04-24 08:13:35

Gee Matt, sorry to tell you this, but they HAVE been ‘bio fuel’ for like, forever. They burn methanol.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by NovaWatcher
2008-04-24 09:33:30

Despite the name “Gasoline Alley”, Indy cars and Champ cars have run on methanol since the 1970s, and just recently switched to ethanol (or is the other way around?).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2008-04-24 12:33:00

And the engines are made by Toyota.

 
Comment by NOVAwatcher
2008-04-24 13:32:27

Honda.

 
 
 
Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-04-24 07:47:55

When I was a kid my older sister dated a redneck. We had a ton of fun going to the local demolition derby, of which he was a star. Anyone could enter, just bring your old beater. My mom thought we’d all lost our minds…which we had.

Comment by Pondering the Mess
2008-04-24 09:27:20

Am I the only one now seeing demolition derbies as the final resting place for all the oversized SUV’s and trucks in this nation once the gas situation goes critical?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-04-24 10:29:58

No.

It’s a glorious idea.

 
Comment by Moman
2008-04-24 14:55:21

That’s exactly where they will end up. We went to DD when I was a kid and they were full of sixties and seventies gas guzzlers.

Another fun with is the circle 8s with campers. Will be a good final resting place for all those RVs and campers the yuppies bought on credit.

 
 
Comment by Matt_In_TX
2008-04-24 15:17:10

I know a guy who used to demo derby. This was after too much body damage (to himself) from drunken driving for other forms of racing (not to mention the problems with maintaining a driving license). Until the body damage became too severe.

If this makes no sense to anyone (as a life strategy), remember the subject matter ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by wittbelle
2008-04-24 09:24:47

Nascar and Blue Angels demonstrations are glaring symptoms of the problem with this country. What a waste.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 10:04:38

It took Billions of years (or 6,000, for you fans of intelligent design) for all the energy of the Sun in liquid form to be collected, and around 200 years to use it up as quick as we possibly could have, sometimes in the zaniest exhibition of waste, imaginable.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by phillygal
2008-04-24 10:27:46

carpe diem baby

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 10:34:31

It’s a Cinderella Story…

@ midnight sometime in our future:

Our cars will turn back into horses, and paved roads will turn back into dirt roads

 
Comment by mad_renter
2008-04-24 14:43:48

There’s quite a bit of evidence to suggest that “fossil” fuel is actually created by the subterranean biosphere and therefore is the product of “Billions of Years” of internal heat and pressure.

Somehow that makes more sense to me than that we’re driving around cars powered by liquid dinosaurs.

 
Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-04-24 14:55:24

Oil isn’t just from dinos, but also from tons and tons of plankton and plant matter.

 
 
 
 
Comment by hd74man
2008-04-24 13:36:24

RE: But record fuel prices have construction company owner Jim Stewart considering scaling down his 250-mile journey from Louisiana.

Each spring and fall Stewart brings a caravan of two motor coaches and two Ford F-250 trucks, both diesel-powered, from Houma, La., to set up camp in Talladega’s infield for weekends of business and pleasure at Sprint Cup races.

Gaz rationing sure is gonna cut down this good ‘ole boys fun.

20 gallons ain’t gonna get that caravan beyond his local fried catfish emporium.

 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-04-24 03:53:32

rice ration:

April 24 (Bloomberg) — Rice advanced above $25 for the first time as Wal-Mart Stores Inc.’s Sam’s Club warehouse unit restricted purchases of some types of rice in the U.S.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=afM0cml2_wf4&refer=us

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 04:33:01

Glad I stocked up, but I eat mostly short grain (half Japanese) and most of it’s grown in Cally so I haven’t seen any major price hikes - 20# at $12.00 for Nishiki brand.

Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 04:39:51

Try brown Texmati. US grown. It’s not bad. Not quite basmati but has a nice smell and cooks well.

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 04:51:57

Sounds good - where can you find it?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-24 04:55:28

I love rice in its liquid form.

 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 04:57:38

Me too! With some raw protein perched on the solid phase stuff… :)

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 05:12:04

You can get it at Whole Foods or any decent grocery store. I’ve seen it at Kroger’s, Albertsons, etc. It often comes in a clear plastic jar.

 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 05:14:28

Oh… :I “decent grocery store” Well that pretty much stops the show for me till I get out to T-Town or Birmingham… I’ll look for it though when I do my once a monther.

 
Comment by packman
2008-04-24 06:17:18

“I love rice in its liquid form.”

You mean like Gerber?

:)

 
Comment by sfv_hopeful
2008-04-24 10:16:11

Mmmmm. Sake.

 
 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2008-04-24 04:57:07

Basmati is a good choice for blood sugar issues (insulin resistance, diabetes,)and weight control (blood sugar relates to weight too). It digests slower than other types of rice.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2008-04-24 14:27:06

I like how it cooks up nice and fluffy in our rice cooker.

 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-04-24 04:40:24

Food hoarding is the new black. Got basmati?

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 06:26:25

When I talked about putting away a year’s worth of food last year, I was a survivalist nut, now i’m perceived as merely a hoarder…

Things are looking up~

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by iftheshoefits
2008-04-24 07:08:59

I think the general behavior regarding commodities and staples is starting to look and feel just like the housing mania… Leave one bubble crashing, start another. I’m seeing lots of signs in this regard.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 07:20:18

We all need to eat, and you can’t just build more food…

Everything looks like a bubble, when you are in the midst of the largest one ever perpetuated in the history of the world~

 
Comment by iftheshoefits
2008-04-24 08:49:11

I’m not sure what you mean about building more food, I certainly grow a lot of my own. I live 20 miles from the nearest year-round grocery store, and over an hour from anything resembling a full-size grocery store, so I have to supplement what I can get. With the price of gas we can’t afford to run out and pick up a few things whenever we want.

The recent hoarding/rationing of rice is definitely showing signs of classic bubblemania. If rice gets too expensive or isn’t available, substitute potatoes or something else, for pete’s sake! There’s plenty of food to go around, albeit more expensive. This is getting silly.

When I was growing up in Baltimore, everytime the weatherman would forecast snow, there would be a run on milk, eggs, and toilet paper, even though Baltimore has (on average) about 1-2 days per decade where travel is impossible due to snow conditions. It was a regional phenomenon, and there was plenty of joking about it. It’s easy to start a panic.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 09:20:01

Food banks all across the land are almost empty and donations have slowed down considerably, so even in a world of apparent plenty, it isn’t if you don’t have any do re mi.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Kim
2008-04-24 07:25:50

I bought rice at Wal-Mart yesterday; there was no crowd in the aisle, and I didn’t get the 3rd degree or have to show ID at checkout. So my first thought upon reading this article was that that some stores just wanted to sell more rice today…

 
 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 04:00:22

Credit Suisse posts - imagine this - wider losses than expected!

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aMZFnpcn9ZUo&refer=home

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-24 05:01:44

Expected by who?

Comment by david cee
2008-04-24 06:27:08

Amazing! “The Trend is Your Friend” strikes again. I also remember some econ teacher sharing that the first report of “bad news” is always followed by a 2nd report of more “bad news”. The first report is always minimized.

Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 07:08:59

If the trend is your friend, why hasn’t someone told the Wicked Witch of the West?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-04-24 04:03:24

ambac needs billions again:

April 24 (Bloomberg) — Ambac Financial Group Inc., the bond insurer that raised $1.5 billion last month, may be forced to seek more capital after it lost money for the third straight quarter.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aLz5jGK8milk&refer=us

Comment by combotechie
2008-04-24 04:36:51

“ambac needs billions again”

Ah, yes; there is nothing like good ol’ cash to solve one’s financial problems.

Nothing else comes close.

Comment by Tom
2008-04-24 06:23:52

People said they were going to throw good money after bad.

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 10:52:58

Ambac, The Red Pill

 
 
Comment by kckid
2008-04-24 04:04:03

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=293842906547200

Oil Shock: When it comes to energy policy, Democrats always talk a good game. But look at their actual record while in control of Congress in the last year and a half. It’s been nothing short of disastrous.

How’s that working for you? As the chart below shows, the cost of energy — measured by the price of West Texas Intermediate crude — is up more than 70%.

For this reason if for no other, none of them deserves re-election.

Comment by hobo in mass
2008-04-24 04:27:03

wow, I thought the run up had something to do with speculation and money supply….should have known it was them Dems.

Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 04:38:11

Another bubble being denied day and night by self-interested parties.

Now we have a rice bubble? I remember recommending corn futures here in Dec. of 2006. That’s where I started my trading “career” lol. Corn, soybeans, sugar, wheat, etc. For hedgers, not this nutty hedge fund speculation going on now. These freaking hedge funds are a cancer. They really need to be destroyed.

Comment by Tom
2008-04-24 06:25:04

They could be destroyed if Bernanke had the balls to raise interest rates 1%. That would shock the hell out of the system. Then back to rate cuts.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by KayLaw
2008-04-24 04:27:59

That article is the silliest load of partisan BS I’ve read this week.

Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-04-24 04:50:38

I agree.

Bush’s policy of invading a 3rd world OPEC country on specious evidence of security threats has been more disastrous than anything the Democrats have done.

Also, listening to the Republicans arguing for tax breaks for oil companies while they are earning record profits is pure comedy. They are just a bunch of rubber stamps for a very corrupt and incompetent administration.

Comment by exeter
2008-04-24 04:58:45

Didn’t the GOP “win” a presidential election in 2000 based on the accusation that the previous administration had no “energy policy”? A time when fuel oil was 45 cents/gal? Fuel oil is now over $4.

Some energy policy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 05:04:04

Uh . . . the Democrats are in control of Congress.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by exeter
2008-04-24 05:21:21

And the GOP in control of the white house and congress until Jan 2007.

Your point?

 
Comment by palmetto
2008-04-24 05:22:39

“the Democrats are in control of Congress.”

In theory, anyway.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-04-24 05:37:10

And here I thought the bankers were in control of congress!

 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-04-24 05:56:44

Congress is something like 52% Dem to 48% Rep. The balance of power belongs to Blue Dog Democrats in conservative districts who are essentially Republicans in everything but name only. When Congress does buck the president, then he retreats behind his shield of non-transparency and stonewalling.

 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-04-24 05:58:32

I guess what I’m saying is that the Democrats would actually have real power if they had a veto-proof majority.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 06:53:50

Why not just forget about things Democrat or Republican and strike at the root, instead?

Corporations are the route of all evil.

 
Comment by texas rules
2008-04-24 07:09:48

And here I was - thinkin’ TxChick was intelligent and stuff. “the Democrats are in control of Congress”. That’s funny!

We need to abolish the Senate. Once that’s done, Democrats WILL be in control of Congress.

 
Comment by spike66
2008-04-24 07:19:43

Of course it is all the Dems fault. The Republicans, in the White House and in Congress,have set new standards for honesty, competence and fiscal prudence never before seen in this country. Only the government of Zimbabwe can beat the Republican record.

 
Comment by SteveH
2008-04-24 08:17:13

Thanks for that, Spike.

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2008-04-24 09:31:31

Yeah, because the Democrats are such examples of virtue, thrift, etc. Whatever.

Both sides are bought and sold by the people with the Big Bucks, which isn’t you or me.

 
Comment by wittbelle
2008-04-24 09:35:56

I thought this was a pretty bright crowd in here. I’m surprised to find you all bickering about whose worse: the republipigs or the dumbocrats. Our ENTIRE government is corrupt. Calling these people “public servants” is an insult. ALL of these politicians are bought and paid for by big business and special interest groups and the sooner we get galvanized for a righteous revolution and get a third party up in here, the better. Until then, we keep going from the frying pan, into the fire and back into the frying pan…. then back into the fire. What’s up ahead might be more akin to being dropped into an active volcano, but only time will tell… Wake up people!

 
 
Comment by yogurt
2008-04-24 06:47:24

Bush’s policy of invading a 3rd world OPEC country on specious evidence of security threats has been more disastrous than anything the Democrats have done.

It’s more disastrous than what any US administration has ever done, period. It’s the biggest foreign blunder in US history. Much bigger than Vietnam - South East Asia would be pretty much the same today with or without the war, and Vietnam had no strategic interest to the US outside of the Cold War. But the Iraq debacle will upset the balance of power in the Middle East for the foreseeable future.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by BP
2008-04-24 07:04:35

I thought the left said no blood for oil! Now you want the oil?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2008-04-24 05:19:08

That article is the silliest load of partisan BS I’ve read this week.

Don’t worry, it’s only Thursday morning.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2008-04-24 04:30:15

“For this reason if for no other, none of them deserves re-election”.

I agree, but way to many folks will tow their party line! They all claim they need more time and of course money.

 
Comment by arlingtonva
2008-04-24 04:31:41

Q: What organization is the largest consumer of oil in the world?

hint: they wear green fatigues

Comment by BucksPiper
2008-04-24 05:02:49

Boy Scouts? :-P

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 05:06:32

Castro’s “Youth Pioneers”?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by SDGreg
2008-04-24 05:28:31

Hummer soccer moms wear green fatigues? I can’t see up that high from my car.

 
Comment by Incredulous
2008-04-24 11:32:50

Gay guys at the disco?

 
 
Comment by taxmeupthebooty
2008-04-24 05:06:54

“some folks didn’t want to drill in ANWR”
nukes now
hitachi or some other jap company actually has an apartment nuke

Comment by LA Wallflower
2008-04-24 13:04:52

There have been nuclear-thermoelectric generators small enough to put in a closet for decades. NASA uses them to power all space probes that go out past Mars, because the sunlight out there isn’t strong enough to run things on solar power.

The Pioneer and Voyager probes have these, and all are still operating and transmitting data back from way out past Pluto… more than 30 years after launch.

One of them could probably run a standard house for 30 years or more. However, they’re usually based on plutonium, so, not really a good thing to have around. :)

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-24 19:43:20

Not so much. Beginning of life/end of life power: 290 / 250 Watts for the RTG used on Gallileo.

http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC25/IMAGES/fig14.GIF

Voyager:
“Therefore, although the initial output of the RTG’s on Voyager was approximately 470 W of 30 V DC power at launch, it had fallen off to approximately 335 W by the beginning of 1997 (about 19.5 years post-launch). As power continues to decrease, power loads on the spacecraft must also decrease. Current estimates (1998) are that increasingly limited instrument operations can be carried out at least until 2020.”

Not going to solve the housing power bubble with plutonium, though there are probably several senators and builders considering it ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2008-04-24 05:08:03

HA! I told my Democratic friends that they were lucky to lose the 2004 election, and warned them that after taking Congress in 2006 someone might try to pin them with an undeserved share of the blame. But it won’t stick.

Let W. take the blame he so richly deserves. And the blame he doesn’t deserve.

Comment by auger-inn
2008-04-24 06:05:57

Here is some more “tin foil” stuff concerning the North American Union. Apparently this is heating up. The youtube has some good footage from Lou Dobbs, members of congress and some union leaders and canadian congressmen, all speaking out asking for transparency from GW & company (which I can assure you will not be forthcoming). We’ll all get the details when the economy collapses and an this “unforeseen” calamity calls for an immediate solution. Then to the amazement of the masses a comprehensive solution which entails a new currency, new trade agreements, border agreements and most importantly a dissolution of our national sovereignty/constitutional rights is quickly passed into law (like the patriot act). Please don’t act surprised when it happens. If you are outraged then please feel free to write your elected officials and ask them to do their job.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vda1KRF75M

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/business/2008/04/22/tucker.nau.nola.cnn

Comment by spike66
2008-04-24 06:46:03

Augur,
The meeting of the NAFTA crew this past week,had the White House releasing press release that included this…that the threesome are continuing “to manage the North American economy”. This is not tinfoil stuff, this is official policy, being implemented as we type.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by auger-inn
2008-04-24 07:02:12

Most of congress is playing dumb, which to me means they are in on it. Probably a “fait accompli” that our constitution is history, just thought I’d bring it up regardless.

 
Comment by HBBLurker
2008-04-24 07:04:37

The question is why would the canadians agree to this, it would screw them more then us, maybe we can sell alaska to canada to pay off our debts….

 
Comment by auger-inn
2008-04-24 07:08:57

Oh, and my first post, which didn’t make the cut apparently, was a comment on the public’s amazement that JP Morgan received a bailout. This bailout is also being touted as the “Bear Stearns” bailout, although nothing could be further from the truth as noted by their demise as an institution.

Nevertheless, if anyone is curious as to which Investment banking institutions are going to “make it”, they might start their research around the idea of who owns the FED.
Would it be a surprise that the owner of the FED is first in line to get money from the FED? Conflict of interest? I know, tin foil hat stuff!

http://land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/federal_reserve.shtml

 
Comment by spike66
2008-04-24 07:26:49

Augur,
agreed. Mencken used to write that most Americans would never vote for the Bill of Rights,let alone the Constitution.
How right he was. Sad though, to watch the death throes of the old republic. And the rights and privileges of citizenship that we once thought were ours.

 
Comment by exeter
2008-04-24 08:26:45

Auger, the fact that the Fed is wholly owned subsidiary of JPMChase isn’t anything new.

 
Comment by Northern Renter
2008-04-24 09:41:43

In terms of Canada and NAFTA, we here in the frozen North hear a number of cries from the States about renegotiating NAFTA. Now I’m not a supporter of the party currently in power in Ottawa, but I agreed with our PM when he pointed out that Canada also has some things in NAFTA that we think ought to be renegotiated, and that (given our oil export capacity) we are in a much stronger negotiating position now than we were when NAFTA was first concluded.

NR

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 04:05:39

LIBOR rates still climbing because - imagine this - banks are afraid other banks have been LIEING!!!!!

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aIVb5afIhFo8&refer=home

Comment by Houston_Bug
2008-04-24 04:08:35

“LYING”

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 04:17:10

I stand corrected - nat enuf cofee… :)

Comment by WT Economist
2008-04-24 05:09:55

You were right the first time. LIEBOR.

More and more surprises for the naive. I actually thought there was an actual interbank market where real prices were observed. I didn’t know they were just asking people and expecting the truth!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by auger-inn
2008-04-24 05:28:31

That’s almost as naive as the wonderment surrounding the bailout of JP morgan by the FED, also known as the BearStearns bailout.

JP Morgan IS the FED, is it a big surprise that the banks/banking families that own the FED are going to be bailed out? I’m mean COME ON, how friggin stupid are we supposed to be here?

http://land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/federal_reserve.shtml

 
Comment by auger-inn
2008-04-24 05:34:58

BTW, this article ought to dispel any notion that the Bear Stearns take down was some random, unplanned event. Read it at the risk of your free-market sanity.

http://www.optionsforemployees.com/articles/idx/0/130/article/Bear_Stearns_BuyOut_100_Fraud.html

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-24 06:16:52

Intelligence agencies commonly ascribe to treason what often should more properly be blamed on the “i”ntelligence (of their adversaries).

I mean, what is the chance anyway of this fantastical situation:

“Maybe the buyers of puts and short sellers of stock
just didn’t believe Reuters, Cox, Schwartz, Cramer and
Faber and went massively short anyway, buying puts that
required a 70% drop in a weeK.”

 
Comment by auger-inn
2008-04-24 06:58:31

Yeah, The petition to open new put options and the subsequent purchasing of 50,000+ put options FIVE days prior to expiry and WAY out of the money, that was just plain old “intelligence”.

Here’s the BIO of the author who is saying he is 100% positive this is fraudulent.

“John Olagues is the owner and principal consultant for Truth IN Options and a recognized authority on listed and employee stock options.

After graduating from Tulane University (where he captained the baseball team and set many of Tulane’s pitching records), John applied his B.A. in mathematics and his competitive spirit to the real world of stock options.

In 1976, John became a member of the Pacific Stock Exchange in San Francisco trading and managing options positions in scores of different stocks. John joined with Blair Hull to create Options Research, the first service to provide theoretical options values to market-makers and to the general public. In 1980, he became a member of the CBOE, where he personally traded more options in more diverse situations than any other trader.”

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 07:16:35

I did fine on Bear Stearns with no knowledge at all. Just common sense.

 
Comment by auger-inn
2008-04-24 08:34:02

The contention of the article wasn’t that Bear Stearns was not in trouble but that the downfall was pre-planned. I don’t doubt you did well and I think it is no big secret that most Investment banks are going to tank to some degree, timing not withstanding (which is always the sand in the vaseline, so to speak).
However, it is the unusal petitioning to add puts just days before the take-over, the amount of puts purchased with just hours remaining before they became worthless as a result of this petitioning that is the focus.

Did you buy puts that were WAY out of the money, five days before expiry and four days before the stock crashed?

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 09:18:12

No but I sure heard about others doing that.

 
Comment by lucy
2008-04-24 09:53:46

How much would those 50,000+ puts have cost, way out of the money, and only days before expiry? Sounds like it would have only been a small investment even for a very small account.

 
Comment by auger-inn
2008-04-24 10:05:15

Good question, the article doesn’t say. I would assume (perhaps incorrectly) that the author would have thought about that angle prior to staking his professional opinion on something so easily explained. However, I acknowledge that I don’t have any idea as to the accuracy of the claim.

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 10:12:30

I posted on here the unusual activity in Bear Stears OOM puts in the days before it crashed. I got the info from Dr. J who was seeing it on his heat seeker program and commented that it must be “amateurs” buying the 50 strike puts. Those puts should have had no bid and asked at 5 cents before people started buying them.

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 10:15:54

Look at the June 30 strike calls (left side of the table). That’s about what you’d have been looking at in those way OOM puts on BSC on a normal day.

http://www.cboe.com/DelayedQuote/QuoteTable.aspx

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 10:17:42

for instance, the BSC June 30 calls are now no bid, .05 ask. That would be about the equivalent. But the buying of these puts started well before the event.

 
Comment by Price Doubt Forever
2008-04-24 12:02:17

Last trade prices of BSC puts just before the collapse:

BSC Mar08 25 put 15 put
3/13 57.00 .30
3/14 30.00 4.50 1.70
3/17 4.81 20.10 10.20

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 04:08:08

Let’s see if the analylsts are right this time. Place yur bets folks!

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&sid=aReV2hmUacRM&refer=home

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-04-24 05:15:08

It doesn’t matter really. Because if the numbers come in higher they will be touted as a sign of recovery. If the numbers come in lower, they’ll be celebrated for being not as low as “expected”.

With every passing day more air is hissing out of the hyper-consumer/service economy regardless. At some point, and probably soon (read: this year) given the recent overall numbers, this month to month monkey business won’t matter anymore.

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 05:26:31

I’m hoping that this will sober down the uber spending public at large just enough for them to reflect on their futures and maybe change their ways —– Naaah! Retail Therapy Baby!!!! :D

 
 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-24 06:20:33

Interesting that Sherwins-Williams is feeling it. I had to wedge my way into their local suburban store on a weekday this week because Lowes didn’t have anyone available to find what I wanted. I felt a bit out of place being the only customer not in painters white.

Comment by MazNJ
2008-04-24 07:53:36

That’s interesting… that’s the third time I’ve heard the same exact story (the other two being local by me - lowes had no one who know anything about paint still there and in one case even advised them not to ask them bc it was a guy from lighting or something who would have to answer and they freely admitted they had no clue).

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-24 16:59:29

My question wasn’t too technical: I needed a 2′ stick for my 5′ wife to paint with ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 06:58:59

7 out, line away…

Next shooter, please

 
 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 04:18:26

Now for something OT and just for all of us who grew up during the Cold War…

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=awMuRdY.8ejo&refer=home

Comment by Blano
2008-04-24 05:36:33

Detroit doesn’t have it’s own air force, but at least it’s got The Sergeant….

http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/frontpage

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 06:23:52

Why don’t they just get one of the surplus M113 APCs from the National Guard for about $2500??? There are thousands of them in surplus around the Army. “Too light to fight, to dumb to run”

 
 
 
Comment by bizarroworld
2008-04-24 04:18:36

Sam’s Club, Costco limit rice purchases as prices rise
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080424/wal_mart_rice.html

The move comes as U.S. rice futures hit a record high amid global food inflation, although one rice expert said the warehouse chains may be reacting less to any shortages than to stockpiling by restaurants and small stores.

Relentless demand from developing countries and poor crop yields have pushed rice prices up 70 percent so far this year, raising concerns of severe shortages of the staple food consumed by almost half the world’s population.

Hoard food to try and beat the price increase that is caused by hoarding food?

Comment by watcher
2008-04-24 04:30:45

I’m going to try to make a couple bucks today selling rice from my van to poor people who live down by the river. Wish me luck.

Comment by wmbz
2008-04-24 04:37:32

Good Luck! Will that be cooked or un-cooked? White or wild?

 
Comment by Frank Giovinazzi
2008-04-24 04:44:21

Find Miami Vice reruns on the telly and cut it up into dime bags, yo.

 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 04:46:41

“Luck”

 
Comment by dennisd
2008-04-24 05:46:49

I think I will do the same. However, since I live in the deep south, I will sell collards and cornbread.

 
 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-04-24 04:41:53

I go through about one 10 lb bag of rice per year. Even if it doubles in price it’s not worth hoarding.

Food prices are affecting how I spend money though. I am eating out a lot less, and buying non-perishables in bulk at Costco.

The hard part for me is cooking for one person without overdoing it. I refuse to keep leftovers for more than a day or two.

Comment by Dr. Fager
2008-04-24 05:41:56

Freeze the leftovers for next week. It’s amazing how much money you can save by cooking in bulk and freezing the food for later.

Comment by WhatOnceWas
2008-04-24 06:20:28

I think the lesson is how fast supplies can dwindle, real or not. Most people, myself included have a couple of days worth ,and if supplies were stopped how fast panic sets in…as in: there is no rice shortage yet the overall mood is “uh oh’”. I actually heard a lot of that Costco rice was being sent by relatives to the Phillipines etc. …still eery signs of times to come.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2008-04-24 06:38:37

I saw that, shipping rice to relatives in the Philippines, and I have to wonder, what the heck does it cost to ship that stuff in small (e.g. 50 to 500 pound parcels) even at cheaper surface rates? Having shipped a fair amount of stuff myself overseas and back, from 1 pound to 6,000 pounds, this just doesn’t seem cost-effective, even at Manila black market prices, unless you do a whole container load.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-04-24 08:56:12

‘ Most people, myself included have a couple of days worth’

Not me. I have about 6 months worth of food I like to eat plus I plan to supplement my diet by eating my neighbors, if needful.

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-24 17:09:24

The summary info I have read is that:

Philippines has morphed toward just-in-time food on advice of the World Bank. System here-to-for has lowered their cost in subsidizing their rice to the poor, (Subsidies making it less profitable for local farmers hurting internal production further.)

Internal production 39% of demand down from 42% several years ago.

This is why they are one of the largest rice importers.

Only 7% of world rice production goes onto the world trading market, hence the susceptibility to speculation, hoarding, and export restrictions among the few who do export. (Export restrictions keep local prices down (the intent) again providing less income to farmers and hurting incentive toward more local production.)

Couple that with production problems in some of the exporters, and with planting shifts (e.g.: Australian drought farmers changing over from water sucking rice to
stuff like grapes at twice the profit per acre), and the rice supply problem doesn’t seem to have any helpful signs except for hoping for serendipitous better harvests next time, despite these building structural problems.

The rice importing nations suddenly all realised they were naked?

 
 
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-04-24 06:30:02

yes but after the 2nd day it tastes awful imo

but i like next day leftovers

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by peverilj
2008-04-24 05:56:06

Some very good recipes for one here.

http://tinyurl.com/6mq3nw

 
Comment by peverilj
2008-04-24 05:57:48

Some very good recipes for one or two here -

http://tinyurl.com/6mq3nw

Comment by Earl 288
2008-04-24 08:14:40

Pever. Thank You

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by foo
2008-04-24 14:15:07

You can easily keep leftover of most cooked entrees for five days.

But I have seen many people with leftover phobia.

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 06:07:44

Rice & other food shortages are only part of the bigger picture of climate change…

Last year bees(Colony Collapse Disorder) disappeared in California & elsewhere, 80% of them.

This year Chinook Salmon (Chinook Collapse Disorder) disappeared from the Sacramento River, 92% of them.

Mother Nature always bat’s last…

Comment by qaxbami
2008-04-24 06:59:14

Food crisis: Human Collapse Disorder?

 
Comment by Mole Man
2008-04-24 07:21:05

These issues don’t have anything to do with climate change. Organically kept bees that aren’t trucked around have been doing fine, and it has been known for a long time that the practice of trucking bees around stresses them out and makes them extremely susceptible to disease.

Salmon have been driven out of the Klamath and Sacto rivers for some time. Last year happened to have a particularly bad combination of low water levels and poor weather conditions, but as with the bees the slide and the conditions that cause it have been in place for some time.

Global warming is something else entirely.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 07:51:30

We have changed the climate, in oh so many ways…

My favorite bit of hard data came from scientists that speculated that contrails of airplanes had quite the effect on our temps, but could never prove anything, as to do his experiment, we’d need all flights shut down across our country…

And then came 9/11 and 3 days afterwards, and guess what?

The skies above us were without the benefit of man-made clouds, and temps were higher all across the land.

If commercial airlines go the way of the Dodo, things are going to heat up…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by goirishgohoosiers
2008-04-24 09:27:20

That’s part of it. Daytime temps were higher, but night temps were lower than before the flight ban. In essence, contrails have a modulating effect; they cause the highs to be lower and the lows to be higher. This had been predicted since contrails are water vapor which is better than CO2 at retaining atmospheric heat.

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2008-04-24 09:39:57

Exactly: the temperature range was greater, which makes sense since the contrails are basically clouds which block out the sun during the day and keep in the heat at night.

 
 
 
Comment by vthousingbear
2008-04-24 07:44:33

Bat’s are dying en masse in New England from a mysterious disease and no one knows how it is communicated.

We humans have shat where we eat and now we are going to pay dearly.

Agent Smith was 100% correct. We are a cancer.

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2008-04-24 09:28:57

RE: Agent Smith

LOL!! Good pull. I quote him all the time when speaking of overpopulation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joe4702
2008-04-24 12:32:18

Why don’t you guys off yourselves now and avoid the rush.

 
 
 
Comment by bluprint
2008-04-24 08:08:06

80% of bees? My wife took up beekeeping a couple years ago. In that time she has become very knowledgeable about the activity, attending meetings and such. I wasn’t aware that CCD was that extensive.

 
Comment by bobo
2008-04-24 11:47:28

I think it has to do more with inflation and the weak dollar, sprinkled in with some commodity traders making a fast buck or two. Gold, Oil and food near all time highs is no coincidence. All that Fed pumping into the bank and all we seem to get is expensive energy and food for the rest of us.

 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-04-24 04:22:49

lawsuit tsunami:

Plaintiffs have filed approximately two private lawsuits a day related to subprime mortgages in the US this year, setting case volumes on course to exceed levels not seen since the aftermath of the savings-and-loan ­crisis, a study has found.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4b1208da-117a-11dd-a93b-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1

Comment by qaxbami
2008-04-24 05:35:28

Seems like everything now is a tsunami, a bubble, or a gate.

Comment by NYCityBoy
2008-04-24 06:16:38

And next we will appoint a Tsar that will declare a “War Against Foreclosures”. Morons are predictable and we have morons in charge at every level.

Comment by edhopper
2008-04-24 07:07:39

Well, if Bush is in charge of the War, he’ll attack the wrong people.
“Let’s throw out the renters there, so we don’t have to throw them out here.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Lucy
2008-04-24 07:45:02

Don’t forget, Perfect Storm

 
 
 
Comment by watcher
2008-04-24 04:25:16

LA: a third world city

Los Angeles is becoming a “Third World city” with immigrants making up half its workforce, says a new study. A third of immigrants have not graduated from high school and 60 per cent do not speak English fluently, the Migration Policy Institute found.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/04/23/wla123.xml

Comment by qaxbami
2008-04-24 06:04:36

Seek a new life in the off-world colonies.

 
Comment by az_owner
2008-04-24 06:05:46

Wait for the daily California thread before pointing out uncomfortable realities about the dying Bear.

Comment by Mole Man
2008-04-24 07:27:34

Production of blockbuster movies, research and development of new biotech drugs and devices, and writing of computer networking applications are all moving to Arizona because of the low taxes and the hostile attitudes toward immigrants, hippies, and nonconformists of any sort.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2008-04-24 12:42:36

We Arizonans aren’t too warm and fuzzy toward immigrants of the illegal variety, but hippies and noncomformists? We’ve got ‘em!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2008-04-24 06:09:43

“Ernesto Cortes Jr, of the Industrial Areas Foundation, a think-tank that specialises on social change, claimed Los Angeles was at a crossroads.

“The question is are we going to be a 21st century city with shared prosperity, or a Third World city with an elite group on top and most on near poverty wages?” he said.”

Oh, hell YEAH, Ernesto, I think you can answer your own question. Same goes for cities like Chicago, Miami, Houston, etc. I was driving around Tampa yesterday and in certain areas, I felt like I was in Mexico or some run down Caribbean island neighborhood. The guy with the tats driving the Mercedes was a really nice touch.

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 06:27:08

Honolulu… Not the same place where I was born in 1961. It’s almost like Manila.

Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-04-24 07:54:39

Yeah, I agree. A lot of Oahu reminds me of a third world country - cockfighting, trash, people living in their cars, on the beaches, etc. etc.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 10:30:43

I retired from there in 2000, Oahu is paradise for tourists, the rich, and the military (mou included), for everyone else, it’s a choice slice of tropical Hell.

 
 
 
Comment by spike66
2008-04-24 06:52:00

“claimed Los Angeles was at a crossroads.”

Yeah,it was at a crossroads 10 years ago. Now, it’s a done deal. Well, all the illegals should be happy, they’ve managed to recreate the third world wherever they’ve settled en masse.

Comment by peter m
2008-04-24 07:14:58

Yeah,it was at a crossroads 10 years ago. Now, it’s a done deal. Well, all the illegals should be happy, they’ve managed to recreate the third world wherever they’ve settled en masse

It took LA about 30 years, basically from the late 70’s or early 80’s ,to attain the status of a third world Tijuana barrio/cesspool. It was coincident with about 30 -40 million illegals, 99% of them from mex-central america, crossing over and recrossing over. 98% of them were/are completely illiterate peasants without any useful skills for a modern society. First 20 years it was LA which was thoroughly inundated and trashed. Then in this decade the migration/invasion took off nationwide, becoming a national problem. It took about 30 years of ceaseless non- stop border invasions for LA to decline to the 3rd world cesspool it is today.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2008-04-24 09:45:05

So, we have at most 20 years left until the rest of the US becomes like LA. Good to know… Probably less time if the North American Union goes through, of course.

 
 
Comment by Mole Man
2008-04-24 07:29:37

People said the same things about Southie in Boston for a hundred years at least. Now that area is all niced up and full of galleries and the like.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-04-24 08:31:54

I haven’t been in southie since before the “clean-up” or rather since I realized the bartenders at my favorite southie watering hole felt it necessary to pack heat.

Didn’t Bostonians say that about southie because of the attitudes of those that lived there (including Mr. Whitey Bulger types)? Are those activities still going on there? Do 20-30 somethings like one of my previous co-workers still consider it a sign of manhood if you take part in street beatings on a regular basis? I don’t know the answer but I wonder if those types got pushed out when investment cashola moved in. Or maybe they’re just cashing in legally but once that gravy train ends the organized activities start up again. It’ll be interesting to watch.

 
 
 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-04-24 07:33:44

Same goes for cities like Chicago, Miami, Houston, etc.

Yeah, I think that statement can apply to most of the major cities in the US. Cities ebb and flow, we know that — but the strong cities survive and are reborn again and again.

What I’m curious about is the outer suburbs and exurbs. Will they become ourequivalent of the Latin American shantytown?

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2008-04-24 09:42:34

When the people who make the rules in their infinite greed don’t want shared prosperity and instead look forward to running the poor over in their big cars, I think we have an answer as to what the future holds.

 
 
Comment by peter m
2008-04-24 07:00:17

“Los Angeles is becoming a “Third World city” with immigrants making up half its workforce, says a new study. A third of immigrants have not graduated from high school and 60 per cent do not speak English fluently, the Migration Policy Institute found.”

I have several theories as to why the LA times, the city of LA, and the mayor, city councel, state oF CA are so pro-illegal imigration. One reason is they embark on massive gov’t pork-barrel projects such as the metro, which need a host of poor to fill those rail cars.

Furthurmore, having lots of third-world immigrants, even illegals, actually adds more layers of gov’t bureacracy to help the poor and disadvantaged, thus increasing more useless parasitic gov’t jobs . All this requires a massive pool of ignorant illiterate proletariats who can be shuffled around and social engineered like shoveling dirt. Big Gov’t loves having a massive pool of helpless ignorant illiterate immigrants who rarely question authority but dutifully keep out of sight and out of the gov’t noses so that the gov”t can continue to plunder the populace and keep power.

This exactly how the City of LA works -though Villarrigosa is talking about laying off workers, LA will in the end raise fees and taxes and merely shuffle the workers around and in the end the no of city workers will not go down by much. Citys & states love power and will extract the monies ruthlessly via more fees revenues, business taxes, rate hikes ect .

LA talks about improving the city, going green, tackling gangs and crime, but in the end LA Gov’t consists of nothing but typical big city machine politician- hacks with only one motive-keep power and grab monies from the populace who can be squeezed.

Comment by LA Wallflower
2008-04-24 13:18:21

Dude, have you ever looked at the 10 and 405 freeways from above during the day? There may be some pork in the Metro projects, and maybe it’s being handled in typical stupid corrupt fashion (see Water Tunnel #3 and the Big Dig) but believe me, we need the damn trains. We’re really gonna need them when gas is $10 a gallon.

The reason why this whole country is soft on the illegal immigrants is because they’ll do crap work on the cheap, thus keeping our wealthy business people as wealthy as possible. Who do you think built all these Lennar, Pulte, Hovananian homes? White college students?

It’s not just an LA problem.

 
Comment by Jon
2008-04-24 13:54:50

Nah, it’s building contractors wanting cheap labor to build houses and an ever increasing population to sell them to, even if it means 3 families/house. Government is just there to take the blame from far right-wingers.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
 
Comment by dude
2008-04-24 16:32:30

Really good threadlette, I find it interesting that when I brought up this very same issue on last weeks weekend topics thread I got shouted down.

A fickle blog we are indeed at times…

 
 
Comment by bizarroworld
2008-04-24 04:30:17


Debt Collection Done From India Appeals to U.S. Agencies

Collection veterans are seeing an unusual phenomena in this economic downturn. “People are walking away from their homes and hanging on to their credit cards, because that is their lifeline,” said Rajinder Singh, the head of global analytic services for Genpact.

Encore pays its collectors in India an average base salary of 17,000 rupees ($425) a month, and they earn bonuses — sometimes more than $1,000 a month — for getting customers to pay. In contrast, collectors in the United States, make about $6,500 a month.

Comment by qaxbami
2008-04-24 04:37:08

Debt collectors are now “sales” persons.

Like many sales teams, Encore’s collectors in India gather for a daily pep talk before their shift. In one recent session, they were schooled on the intricacies of American tax policy.

“One hundred thirty million U.S. families will get a tax rebate this season” as part of the new economic stimulus package, Manu Sharma, the team leader, explained to a roomful of top-earning collection agents, most in their 20s. Those who qualify for the rebates will get as much $600 a person or $1,200 a household, he said, and “the I.R.S. is going to start paying this money in May.”

Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 04:41:52

But are they schooled in the FDCPA and FCRA? Gosh, i’d love to get one of them on the phone and have them commit all sorts of malfeasance. It would be pretty easy.

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 04:55:57

“Hello, my name Rajneesh Singh - but you must call me “Bob” yes, call me “Bob”, I am from S-k-e-n-e-k-t-a-d-d-y New York - I’m a homeboy…”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-04-24 04:54:19

I wouldn’t be surprised if Indian debt collectors are probably more effective because you’ll do anything to stop the calls. The thick accent and persistent obtuseness from being unable to deviate from the script reading would drive anyone insane.

Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 05:01:47

I don’t know why people talk to these vultures at all, I don’t care where they’re calling from.

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-24 06:34:47

I just wish their crack investigators would check the phone book. Comparatively speaking, how often do deadbeats change their names and keep their old phone numbers?

Another war front of the housing collapse: However much you are overpaying, DON’T change your phone number, even if you have lived at that address for years. The chance of getting a dead beat’s disconnected number is likely going through the roof. ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 07:12:40

My husband has had the same phone number for 7 years now and he’s still getting collection calls for some clown who walked debt at least that long ago.

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-24 17:10:46

That is NOT comforting to hear!

 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2008-04-24 05:06:54

Oh, lordy, tell me about it. I had to deal with one of them on a tech support issue. By the time I was done, I wanted to shoot my computer.

 
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-04-24 05:08:03

caller id helps with that sort of annoyance

i get the other end of the spectrum with people calling me to sell me stuff and offer me more credit

i use maybe 3% of my total available credit every month and pay in full

when they call i just answer with my work answer hello ……….

i am sorry you reached a business mgnyc99 is not here it throws them off

 
 
 
Comment by qaxbami
2008-04-24 04:33:48

Lenders Swamped by Delinquent Mortgages

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/22/AR2008042201339.html

Seven out of 10 troubled mortgage borrowers remain without a plan to work out their loans despite increased industry efforts to help them … the lenders are overwhelmed by their workloads and unable to keep pace with the number of borrowers who are falling behind on payments.

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 04:34:28

You want to see complete insanity? Check out the prices of these used handbags. Yes, I know the status of them but evidently the status mavens couldn’t afford to keep them?

http://www.portero.com/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/Search?GO_SEARCH=YES&sort_order=edatea&wl=66292034&textsearch=birkin+and+not+bangle&cmpid=emc20080423_port_html_fi_fh_hermes_birkins

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 05:04:56

Beyond disgusting - just - revolting. What else can I say? :(

 
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-04-24 05:13:43

oh god 20k for a bag? and it is used?

can you live in it?

Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 05:24:45

You missed the 50K one? Gee, would you rather have that or 50 oz of gold? Both inflated of course, but that’s a tough one . . .

Comment by lmd in big D
2008-04-24 07:05:08

$48,500 for a piece of leather!?!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Al
2008-04-24 08:33:28

So instead of throwing the bag into the garbage after rummaging the contents, we’ll be seeing purse snatchers dumping the contents into the garbage and keeping the bag.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by eastcoaster
2008-04-24 07:01:46

Sorry, but I don’t even get the status of them. I think one of the least impressive things I can think of is a handbag.

 
 
Comment by qaxbami
2008-04-24 04:47:53

County Aims to Make Green Homes Mandatory

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/22/AR2008042202839.html

New homes built in Montgomery County would have to meet federal energy efficiency standards under innovative legislation approved yesterday by the County Council over the objections of builders who said that the mandate would drive up costs for consumers.

The measure, meant to reduce energy consumption by 15 to 30 percent, is part of a far-reaching environmental initiative. It includes property tax credits for residents who switch to renewable energy, a requirement that residents disclose utility costs when they sell a home and a plan to get county officials to trade in their government-issued sport-utility vehicles.

Comment by palmetto
2008-04-24 05:24:32

” builders who said that the mandate would drive up costs for consumers.”

Ooooh, I’m scared.

 
Comment by Sleeper
2008-04-24 06:12:26

The state of Maryland, and Montgomery County in particular, are way ahead of the curve on this and I aplaud them for it. I’m an Architect in the DC area and I do everything from single family residential to huge commencial projects and I hear builders and developers bitch all the time about ‘tree huggers’ and new regulations that make their job SOOOOOO dificult. I used to try and reason with them and cajole them into doing the right thing. Now I just say STFU and comply with the F’in LAW. I have great respect for people who actually buid things but a lot of contractors lately are just greedy incompetent scum.

Comment by JR
2008-04-24 20:33:50

“Now I just say STFU and comply with the F’in LAW.”

Sweet. “Comply with the law” is maybe a little bit of a drag, but “STFU” is right on.

 
 
Comment by Mole Man
2008-04-24 07:36:54

Hopefully some clearer communications will become available. Effective “green” building does cost a bit more up front, but most of the cost of a structure comes from upkeep over time and by saving money on heating and cooling and using more durable components the result is substantial savings over the life span of the structure (typically 15-50 years for houses).

 
Comment by Al
2008-04-24 08:36:27

“The measure, meant to reduce energy consumption by 15 to 30 percent, is part of a far-reaching environmental initiative.”

15 to 30 percent? Population growth will outstrip this in less than a decade.

Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-04-24 10:04:18

Great logic — they should do nothing because of future growth projections, huh?

McMansions for everybody!

Comment by Al
2008-04-24 11:27:49

Not what I was going for ET. Either more agressive reductions in energy consumption are necessary or slower growth.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-04-24 11:51:04

Ah, sorry, I misunderstood the gist of your post.

 
Comment by Al
2008-04-24 12:07:31

NP ET. It annoys me a bit when someone trumpets their “far-reaching environmental initiative” when it is really a drop in the bucket. Right direction, wrong magnitude.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2008-04-24 09:49:23

Somehow, in the end this will just result in more absurdly overprices houses (Maryland’s good at that) and green-features that don’t work as advertised.

Maybe if they want to be green, they should stop building huge McMansions on tiny lots and stop cramming condo developments into every square corner of land that wasn’t yet paved over!

Comment by hip in zilker
2008-04-24 14:32:26

I’m with you, Ponder!

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2008-04-24 04:51:57

April 24 (Bloomberg) — Students in the U.S. have lost access to more than $6.7 billion a year in education loans after private lenders fled the market, spurring schools including Pennsylvania State University and Northeastern University to turn to the Education Department’s Direct Loan Program. At least 178 schools have applied since Feb. 28 to let students borrow from the direct program, compared with 80 that applied for the program in all of last year.

Ever and always, when others sources of money dry up they head for Washington, D.C. to seek access to taxpayer-backed funds. It will not be long before a movement to provide “free” college education will be all over the headlines on the grounds higher education is becoming too expensive for deserving but cash-strapped youth.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-04-24 12:37:56

Oh please, the NDSL program was a reason why many middle income kids went to school in the 80s when college was cheap. I worked in my college’s financial aid office. It was the largest source of many students’ assistance packages. That program became a smaller player on the scene as the banks realized they were missing out of some potential profits and started schmoozing the schools to steer borrowers their way.

Btw, I took the full 10 years to pay back my loan from an ‘83 graduation but easily afforded a new apt and a new (used) car upon graduation without firing up the credit cards. It was probably a time in my life when I had the biggest cushion of discretionary income (before moving to more expensive Boston, and adding on the husband and kids, dontcha know!) Thank you NDSL program! I remember w/great fondness those years of being newly self-sufficient, moving up in the world and w/barely noticeable burden of debt! Our kids really do deserve the chance for the same.

 
 
Comment by Dave of the North
2008-04-24 04:55:11

Now that real estate isn’t bubbly any more, you can always try art:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080424.wartbanking24/BNStory/Entertainment/home

Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 05:21:19

We had the $72M Rothko last summer. Probably hanging in the loo of some master of the universe in PE or a hedge fund. Soon to reappear on the art market when the margin calls come.

 
Comment by Blano
2008-04-24 05:47:28

“Less artsy, more fartsy!!!”

 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2008-04-24 05:27:48

Democratic leaders may add unemployment benefits to war bill

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080424/ap_on_go_co/congress_iraq_funding

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 05:46:21

Woeful auction reveals extent of property crisis

“Barfoot & Thompson staged a “clearance” auction of 51 North Shore properties in Auckland last night, but was only able to sell 3 properties as buyers were scarce and bids even scarcer, attendees at the auction said.”

“Real estate agents and property investors are reporting that demand virtually dried up in March and April as first home buyers withdrew from the market because of higher interest rates and high prices, while property investors have stepped back given uncertainty about house prices.”

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/3/story.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10506000
____________________________________________________________

Down Under canary in a coal mine…

Comment by nhz
2008-04-24 06:07:09

but judging from asking prices, sellers have not yet noticed that the market is drying up (just like in Old Zealand on the other side of the globe …).

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 06:10:34

’sellers’?

I seem to remember that word being in vogue, once upon a time…

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 06:33:11

nhz:

I find it amusing that both Zealands were amongst the most overpriced real estate markets in the world, from an affordability standpoint..

Antipodean Point

Comment by nhz
2008-04-24 06:52:36

yeah, still trying to work out what is causing the extremes in irrational exuberance on these locations. I wonder if the Maori’s ever had some version of the tulip bubble, or if the bubble was a Dutch export product?

The real antipode to NZ is Spain, also a prime bubble market (with Wellington the exact antipode to Salamanca where my brother lives; can’t be coincidence …)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 08:07:57

Not many people recall the Maori greenstone bubble of 1333.

 
Comment by JR
2008-04-24 21:19:23

I remember it like it was yesterday.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Steve W
2008-04-24 05:49:27

For the Chicago boys and girls. Sales prices and Number of months supply april 2006 vs april 2008. Warning-pdf.

IMO, most telling stat is that in 2006 the average months supply was about 4 months. Now it’s 11 here.

http://media1.suntimes.com/multimedia/suburbandatadd0608.pdf_20080423_15_18_21_81.imageContent

share and enjoy

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-24 05:55:40

“Hoist by one’s own petard” section:
http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2008/04/so_about_that_convention_cente.php

$42M (bonds) city appraisal for a parking lot intended for a Mayor boosted $500M (lots of bonds) convention hotel.

Turns out that the owner of the parking lot has a history of contesting the $7M tax appraisal of the property as too high. Concerned citizens and even the city council members wondering why the Mayor is rushing to spend $42M for it before determining whether the $500M convention hotel makes any sense.

OK, even if they use “current use”, that is still pretty funny.

Comment by auger-inn
2008-04-24 06:25:22

Let me guess. He is getting a kickback from the developer?

Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 06:31:52

In Dallas? For shame you would think that ;)

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-24 06:42:58

Of course not. It’s deeper than that.

I think it is a diversion while they build a freeway from Mexico to Ross Perot’s airport north of Ft. Worth down the middle of the Trinity river flood plain between the levies past that park they voted to build but have no money left over to pay for after the freeway and extravagant bridges.

Comment by auger-inn
2008-04-24 07:24:01

You are talking about the NAU here and the “superhighway”, which is officially tin foil hat theory, so be careful where you tread.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Matt_In_TX
2008-04-24 07:49:47

OK, but my way is funnier. ;)
Still, building a freeway down the center of a flood prone river is still slated to be another Dallas area first!

Assuming they don’t ever actually officially ask the Corps of Engineers if they can do it.

(To be even more fair, the Dallas Observer is the local scandal rag. Still, it is much more interesting to read than the local major papers. DO writers actually go to the city council meetings. Amazing what head scratching stuff goes on.)

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 10:06:46

They were the only ones accurately reporting on the Trinity River boondoggle. I see that Schutze and Angela Hunt are in this story as well.

 
 
Comment by TXFarmer
2008-04-24 07:57:59

Maybe T. Boone can get in on the deal and tie his water pipeline into the highway right of way so he can drain the Ogallala faster by selling to Austin and San Antonio as well.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by MazNJ
2008-04-24 05:58:05

Wow….

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/23/BAIU10ALDM.DTL&feed=rss.bayarea

A landlord couple have been charged in San Francisco with waging a campaign of terror against their renters in a South of Market building, including cutting out the floor supports at one apartment after the tenant went to court to keep from being evicted, authorities said Wednesday.

Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-04-24 06:10:34

Being a landlord must be one of the suckiest jobs in the Universe. Yet another reason not to ‘invest’ in real estate.

I’m more inclined to buy a nice resort property when real estate eventually bottoms and open a bed & breakfast when I retire, anyway.

Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2008-04-24 06:51:25

Being a landlord can be a sucky job if you’re not paying lots for a management company. A friend of mine is just getting into the business in Dallas, where it’s possible to at least come close to breaking even (unlike here in the DC area where buying a place to rent out is a surefire way to a financial black hole).

Meanwhile, another friend in Fort Worth was simultaneously last weekend just celebrating having got RID off all his rental properties! Way too much hassle, he said, and he spent a lot of time warning the newbie about the fun times ahead.

As for a nice B&B, I know a couple who have done that. It’s hard work. You have to love people — a lot. You have to sometimes pretend to love people you detest. They do, and so for them it’s tolerable and sometimes even fun, even the rise-at-5:30 AM part (he does that, she takes care of evening more or less).

But they say they really don’t make any money at it, and they are fortunately well off enough already that their B&B is for them basically an alternative to the tennis court in daytime and dinner out in the evening. They really do miss the flexibility of their day jobs, amazingly. Who’d have thought they’d be tired of being chained to the B&B schedule 365 days a year? OK, not every day, since sometimes they aren’t booked and can relax. But still, it’s real work, as hard as any job they ever had, or so they say.

Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-04-24 10:42:40

Thanks for the advice…I can’t imagine actually retiring anyway. Can’t stand the idea of shuffleboard, bingo halls and generally becoming a houseplant. It would probably be more of a hobby that generated some income.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 06:20:28

Domestic Terrorents

 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 06:31:27

“Holey Cr*P Batman!!” (sorry)

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-04-24 06:44:53

I saw that movie, except it was the evil tenant.
Is this the sequel?

 
Comment by ahansen
2008-04-24 07:01:04

RED MEAT ALERT:

Okay, it was early in the morning, I needed something to bring a little sweetness and light unto my day, so I read all 18 pages of comments on this story in SF Gate.

Exactly NONE took the side of the property owners. Several referred to “my” apartment as they threatened to shoot the landlord. (I mean, how desperate do you have to be to cut the floor out of your own property to get rid of a crap tenant?)

I suppose this all goes back to our disgust with the media’s tales of foreclosed home “owners,” but why are these people being villainized to this extent? I realize this is San Francisco and everything but c’mon. Not ONE letter in support of owner’s rights?

 
Comment by qaxbami
2008-04-24 07:06:40

Judge: When did you first notice the bathtub-sized hole in your living room floor?

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-04-24 07:39:53

He OVERPAID by at least $300-400K for a rent controlled 6 family, he relied on a real estate agent saying that it would be Ok to kick out those low rent tenants and replaced them with market rate ones.

OOPS ……I love these I am KING of my castle landlords…they are so easy to sue and WIN!

 
Comment by SF Mechanist
2008-04-24 09:01:47

Welcome to San Francisco… I hear stories like this all the time. They are always these artsy-fartsy types from wealthy backgrounds, and they all seem to have pit bulls.

Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-04-24 13:05:35

They are always these artsy-fartsy types from wealthy backgrounds, and they all seem to have pit bulls.

The landlords … or the tenants?

Comment by SF Mechanist
2008-04-24 19:38:34

The landlords… tenants are Bohemians!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 06:14:36
Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-04-24 07:48:14

Very good article, txchick57. Of course, our blog is almost entirely devoted to the psychology of human greed and egotism.

 
 
Comment by whyoung
2008-04-24 06:41:47

Walk by a gas station in Queens on the way to the subway every morning. Between 4/16 and the afternoon of 4/22 regular went up 26 cents a gallon. On Wednsday 4/23 it went up another 10 cents in one day. Now $4.05

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 07:04:59

When I was a lad of Stingray self-propulsion in the early 70’s, gas tripled in price, occurring as a fallen leader refused to admit his faults and face the truth, and speak honestly to us.

 
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-04-24 07:23:05

thank godi drive very little and have a 4 cylinder car

all these suv driving jackass types will feel the pain

wait unitl it is $5 a gallon

is gas siphoning far behind?

Comment by whyoung
2008-04-24 10:00:29

Perhaps an opportunity for an entrepreur to bring back the locking gas cap like we had in teh 1970’s

 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-04-24 10:02:09

Every time I see a behemoth SUV I have to wonder how much those turkeys will fetch once gas hits $6 a gallon.

Which also makes me wonder how long until we see pickups sold with small diesel engines (not the macho torque monsters they sell today). Say a 3 liter diesel that cranks out 150 hp and 200 ft/lbs ofd torque. This certainly won’t appeal to those who buy pickups to look macho, but perhaps it might appeal to those who actually use a pickup for real world applications, and who wouldn’t mind getting 30 mpgs.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 10:17:13

My wife and I were playing a stereo-typing game on the freeways of el lay, yesterday.

We’d come up behind a certain type of car and guess to as who was driving it, and the easiest to figure out was the mid-size SUV, mostly women drivers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 10:45:28

Mercedes makes a very nice Blue Tec diesel in the range you’re thinking of. They also power Sprinter chassis motor homes with 5000# towing capacity and 25 mpg on a 5 cylinder engine. Good stuff.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 10:50:23

It’s hitting the local yokels here pretty hard - Gas at Wally World is now up to $3.39 for regular - Chevron and Shell (my fave) is running $3.47, Premium is $3.63. Nothing sadder (NAAAAAH) than watching a Suburban or Expedition owner come into the station and pump $11 into his or her behemoth then drive slowly off. :) (Schadenfreude- sorry Sammy).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by auger-inn
2008-04-24 10:12:42

I drive a 98′ jeep sport cherokee and the gas tank is syphon proofed. We found out the hard way when we went to ship it to Alaska and it had to have less than a 1/4 tank for the move. We had just filled it up and spent several hours driving around burning it off after bringing it to a service station for an attempt at the aforementioned syphoning.

 
Comment by LA Wallflower
2008-04-24 13:28:08

They’re not bothering to bust the gas caps - I hear they’re just drilling the tanks directly instead.

Believe me, it’s already happening and will get a lot worse. I remember 1974 very well - my dad’s car got siphoned 4 or 5 times, the last two even with locking caps, which got crowbared off.

 
 
 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 06:45:26

Durable goods orders FALL against analyst’s expectations … I posted a Bloomberg article predicting a RISE in D.G’s Now let’s see what the new home sales numbers look like - analysts batting .000 anyone?

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/orders-durable-goods-fall-third/story.aspx?guid=%7B189B07EB%2D7524%2D43E9%2D9281%2DFA0B0EDC09B0%7D

 
Comment by Frank Hague
2008-04-24 06:52:00

http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2008/04/the-psychology.html

“The crisis is compounded by what psychologists call “loss aversion.” The real estate market is by no means immune to this phenomenon. Numerous studies have shown that humans hate losses much more than they like gains. This means that losing $1,000 hurts you about twice as much as winning $1,000 makes you feel good. In the stock market, investors hold on to losers longer than winners, even though there are tax incentives to do just the opposite.

How does this play out in the housing market? Reluctant to take less for their houses than their neighbor got just a year ago, sellers tend to keep their houses on the market for far too long. So even as the market began to go south, people foolishly failed to budge.”

I’ve seen this play out with people I know. I have a family member who is renting out a one of the houses he owns “until the market comes back”. This person is wealthy so they are no financial danger, but is impossible to reason with him.

Comment by Moman
2008-04-24 08:34:02

The wealthy aren’t immune from mistakes. I looked at a rental condo owned by an English gentlemen who paid cash. They wanted $1150 a month and not a penny less. I rented the (larger) condo next door for $1100 a month and got twice the room. The Englishman’s place is still empty, and a unit like his commands rents of $950 a month.

Comment by Frank Hague
2008-04-24 09:10:26

No the wealthy aren’t immune, in some cases they can be more short sighted because they can afford to be. In this particular case I keep my mouth shut because to offer an opinion would threaten family peace. I would rather have a pleasant thanksgiving than an honest conversation about real estate with most of family members.

 
 
Comment by nhz
2008-04-24 08:35:42

just imagine the gridlock when most of the sellers are very wealthy (because of their home equity) like in Netherlands …

 
 
Comment by Moman
2008-04-24 07:10:11

Off-topic

I need some advice. I run a small business doing consulting work. I am having a hard time finding people I can trust to advise me and help the business grow. Most of the people I know at the moment are talkinghead know-it-alls who don’t offer anything but criticism. Another couple people like to use my ideas to grow their own businesses.

How do I go about finding a small group of people I can trust to provide unbiased advice? Do these people exist?

Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2008-04-24 07:22:15

The best advice I’ve had on those matters was from people who actually run the same type of business. In my case, it was international IT consulting agency stuff. Problem is (for you), that these people were already personal friends of mine for years, and I wasn’t competing in the same market as they were, so it was partly social, partly business. I buy them good dinners, they give lots of good advice (getting contracts, tax issues, contacts, etc).

How you would approach that situation if you haven’t got the social network already in place is perhaps problematic, at least for the short term. Paying for the advice is probably quite hit or miss, as you know.

Outside of your own network can you find someone who perhaps recently LEFT the business? Not via bankruptcy, I mean, but having sold out to retire after a successful run, and who is willing to take on a part time consulting role to advise you? I know some older guys who are keen on doing that type of thing partly for “pocket money” and partly just for fun. Again, the problem is finding them. In some businesses, the network you have is a large part of the whole package.

Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 09:34:06

Check out BNI.

http://www.bni.com/

I’ve had friends who go to their weekly breakfasts and have said it’s really worth it.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2008-04-24 12:00:56

OTOH, the HOWies are offering mixed reviews. See:

http://forum.howdesign.com/tm.aspx?m=385467

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Moman
2008-04-24 15:04:01

Thanks for all the comments. I’ll check out BNI - kudos TxChick.

It hard to adapt when you realize when you’re surrounded by risk averse people who are scared of change. This blog is a refreshing oasis of intelligence and common sense.

 
 
Comment by M Fernandez
2008-04-24 07:13:08

Redfin addict with a question: I see properties listed wherein, for example, the assessed value is $200K. The last tax paid was $2300. The last sale, however, was $565K. The sale prior to that was in 2000, for $196K. Not being a very sophisticated RE magnate (renting a shoe-box apt for the past 11 years), ISTM that Prop 13 is what’s keeping the assessed value so low, and that the $565K might have been a HELOC or cash-out-refi. Does that make sense or might something else be going on? Also, being able to buy, at a stretch, a $480K place in about a year, I’m looking at places in the $575K-and-below range (for ideas & neighborhoods), hoping they’ll drop to that amount by the time I’m seriously looking. Comments?

 
Comment by spike66
2008-04-24 07:16:29

Writedowns now at $290 billion and climbing…any bets on when we hit $500 billion.

From Bloomberg, this a.m….
“the world’s biggest banks and securities firms have reported credit losses and writedowns of about $290 billion linked to the collapse of the U.S. subprime mortgage market. Credit Suisse marked down loans for leveraged buyouts and mortgage-related securities.”

 
Comment by Blano
2008-04-24 07:20:47

Again I see I live in the wrong place. Never heard of any open houses like these:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120899931905740169.html?mod=hpp_us_inside_today

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 10:42:00

“Candy is dandy, but liquor is quicker”

Willy Wonka

 
Comment by hip in zilker
2008-04-24 14:47:29

things are tending the opposite direction in my neighborhood. the mcmansions sit long enough on the market and the RE people quit filling up the little boxes with their flyers… to save on color photocopy expense I guess

 
 
Comment by spike66
2008-04-24 07:31:42

New Home Sales Plunge…
April 24 (Bloomberg) — Purchases of new homes in the U.S. plunged more than forecast in March to the lowest level in almost 17 years as stricter loan rules and falling prices caused buyers to hold off.

Sales dropped 8.5 percent to an annual pace of 526,000, the fewest since October 1991, from a 575,000 rate the prior month, the Commerce Department said today in Washington. The median sales price slumped 13.3 percent from the same time last year, the most in almost four decades.

A jump in subprime mortgage defaults and record foreclosures have worsened the real-estate slump and led banks to limit lending. The threat of a prolonged recession is growing as lower home values constrain consumer spending and persistent declines in homebuilding subtract from economic growth.

“This blows away any hope that things are stabilizing in housing,” said Michael Feroli, an economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co. in New York. “It’s a negative for growth and for the economy, and it’s going to persist into the second half of the year.”

 
Comment by Chip
2008-04-24 07:39:16

Am off to the Sarasota area for a few days, to check out the market there.

Comment by Moman
2008-04-24 08:35:40

To save you the time and gas, I’ll paraphrase it:

It sucks

(have fun)

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-04-24 08:42:31

I was checking the Saratoga market for rentals when I found homes for rent in limited supply here. (Hub could work in Albany office instead of Syracuse.) The rentals were much more plentiful and affordable there. I then checked housing and just laughed. I found housing to still be a very high ratio to rents.

Anyone have any idea how Quad Graphics, a major employer in town, is doing anyway? I wondered if the march of the internet was hurting them.

Comment by exeter
2008-04-24 10:36:20

Carrie, Chip was talking sarasota FL not Saratoga Springs. A buddy of mine works for Quad. I’ll see if I can’t get ahold of him. I find it interesting that SS had cheaper rentals. I don’t see it myself. SS is the heart of dumbass country in upstate so fantasy prices are completely delusional. Rentals too.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-04-24 19:03:00

Yes but the problem is inventory. SFH rentals are almost non-existent in this market. As one realtor I asked said, “We don’t have many transients around here.” (Sigh!)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 07:40:36

YES!!!! Analysts batting .000! New house sales come in at -8.5, analysts expecting -2 What’s that? Off by (drum roll) 10.5%!

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/new-home-sales-sink-85-17-year/story.aspx?guid=%7B983B3C33%2DAE77%2D42D3%2DB29F%2D46BB8302562B%7D

 
Comment by hoz
2008-04-24 07:43:43

Comment by watcher
2008-04-23 09:09:50

“Speaking of which, that China short ETF that Hoz was touting is a total dog. It has sunk like a stone even though the China market tanked. …”

The ETF in question treated me very well, it went from under 70 to 110 in a little over 6 weeks. I started selling at 100.

One of the major problems with 2:1 ETFs is they lose money in a whipsaw market. It is 2:1 when in your favor , but they all lose 4:1 when it goes against you.

example: Bullish ETF trading at 100
market drops 10% on monday, ETF loses 20% stock market rises 10% on tuesday, ETF gains 20%; stock market is down 1% ETF is down 4%. Fact read prospectus.

Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 09:09:14

Ignore that clown.

Comment by matt
2008-04-24 09:18:31

Hi tx, missed some puts on fxe (bid too low),picked up more dcr, qqqq and spy (all yesterday). Hit the long side of unp and bni on the pullback today.

Comment by txchick57
2008-04-24 10:03:55

I’m going to set stops now on the long positions. May has the potential to be nasty. More to the point, I’m tired of looking at it. Going into the midyear doldrums.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-24 12:57:52

or you could just be in the loop of information that had the cap put on the Chinese markets, now they lift the cap….and low and behold…..off to the races.

when is the Chairman gonna get the capital controls buttons on his iphone?

 
 
Comment by Mr. Drysdale
2008-04-24 08:01:20

Huge miss in March + February revised lower + Sales likely OVERSTATED due to cancellations + 27 year high in Inventory likely UNDERSTATED + 3 consec. months declines in DG orders. My question: Why isn’t the market rallying today on this exceptional news?

 
Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-04-24 08:03:07

Grand Junction, Colorado bank disciplined by federal regulators:

The Daily Sentinel

“Federal bank regulators have taken enforcement action against a Grand Junction bank, alleging it engaged in unsafe and unsound banking practices by illegally investing in a mortgage product.

The Office of the Comptroller of Currency announced this month it had reached an agreement with First National Bank of the Rockies on steps the bank will take to address the violations raised by the comptroller.

An agreement signed in March by a comptroller representative and members of the bank’s board of directors indicates the bank “engaged in violations of law and unsafe and unsound banking practices relating to its board oversight, investment trading activities, credit administration, other real estate owned administration and management of liquidity.” Other real estate owned refers to property acquired by the bank through foreclosure.”

http://tinyurl.com/3m2p3p

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 09:28:57

Rockies situation there, they never met a violation they didn’t like.

 
 
Comment by SawItComing
2008-04-24 08:09:53

This is related to Ben’s assertions yesterday or the day before that nobody should buy anything built during the bubble.

“Company refuses to pay for repairs to home built on unstable ground”

http://www.cdapress.com/articles/2008/04/24/news/news01.txt

Comment by reuven
2008-04-24 08:33:02

This has been an ongoing discussion point here for years! I think people who will look for a home in a few years will avoid the “bulle years” because the houses will be preceived as having lower quality.

When you buy a 20 year-old house that’s been well maintained, you’ll probably have fewer surprises than a KB or Pulte near-bankruptcy job.

 
Comment by Sleeper
2008-04-24 10:08:57

Hmmm. Thats a very good point that I hadn’t considered but it makes complete sense. As an architect I have been watching this mess unfold with growing horror at the shoddy worthless junk that has been vommited up just about everywhere. I dont care hob big the ‘lawyer foyer’ is, Its still just a pile of stick built crap. Ironically, the only places that might have escaped this are California and Florida because of earthquake and hurricane zone building codes but even there I’m sure a lot of stuff ’slithered’ by. A few crisp hundreds slipped to a building inspector can go a long way.

 
 
Comment by takingbets
2008-04-24 08:12:46

SUPERVALU Enables Customers to Stretch Economic Stimulus or Tax Refund Checks
Thursday April 24, 11:00 am ET
Shoppers Can Watch Their Refunds Grow at SUPERVALU Stores Nationwide

MINNEAPOLIS–(BUSINESS WIRE)–SUPERVALU INC. (NYSE:SVU - News) today announced a program that enables shoppers to exchange their economic stimulus or tax refund checks for a store gift card loaded with extra money. Customers can redeem their checks for store gift cards in $300 increments, and stores will add an extra $30 to each card. This offer is available May 2 through July 31, 2008, at all SUPERVALU stores, including Acme, Albertsons, bigg’s, Cub Foods, Farm Fresh, Hornbacher’s, Jewel-Osco, Lucky, Shaw’s/Star Market, Shop ‘n Save and Shoppers Food & Pharmacy.

http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/080424/20080424005899.html?.v=1

look out, everyone is in line to steal your rebate check!!!!!

 
Comment by exeter
2008-04-24 08:31:54

Gold is up a negative $15. See? Gold always goes up.

Comment by Blano
2008-04-24 09:48:56

LOL

 
Comment by Halifax
2008-04-24 10:01:08

Would you like to put a price tag on that opinion - say 9 grand?

Gold Comex JUN 2012 1400 C Limit 91.50 Day Order

Comment by exeter
2008-04-24 10:09:55

Up up up!!! lmao.

Comment by Halifax
2008-04-24 10:43:07

Let’s meet in the open outcry pit tomorrow for a friendly business transaction - wire some cash to Interactive Brokers, ooptionsxpress, or if you’re a big shot, to your TradeStation account. I’ll sell you a June gold 2012 call for 9 grand.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 11:08:24

It’s fun going to the pit at the Grain Exchange in Mnpls and watching the traders doing the open outcry thing. A little bit of the past (lots of shoving followed by lots of standing around followed by …)

 
Comment by exeter
2008-04-24 12:04:43

Lets me at the ok corral, tomorry at haaaa noon for a six gun showdown….. lmao.

 
Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-04-24 15:01:35

Hey, did any of you ever play the game “Pit” when you were kids? We fancied ourselves quite the Wall Streeters. You pass out a bunch of cards and then everyone tries to get the corner by having all the cards of one kind (commodities). Well, anyway, the main fun part of the game was when the dealer said, “Pit’s open!” and then everyone would yell “Corn corn, I got 3 corn” or “Wheat, wheat, 2 wheat” until …until your mom ran you outta the house…

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by hoz
2008-04-24 08:31:54

from Costar

“Maybe the Wealthy Do Have Something in Common with Commoners: They Aren’t Buying Homes Either

Despite low interest rates and an abundance of available properties, 76% of wealthy Americans say they will not add to their real estate holdings this year, according to 800 Americans with an average income of $287,000 and net worth of $2.9 million surveyed by the Luxury Institute.

A belief that the decline in prices has yet to bottom (27%); a desire to keep investments liquid (25%); and uncertainty about the direction of the economy (24%) are key reasons for sitting out the market.

Of potential buyers, 29% said they would buy a residential investment property. More than one in four (28%) buyers were in the market for a vacation home; 18% would require their new homes to be “eco-friendly.”

More than one-fifth (22%) of wealthy buyers would spend $1 million or more on their next purchase, 11% would spend more than $2 million. However, the most active segment of the market should be homes between $250,000 and $499,999.

Real estate accounts for 35% of the total assets, on average, of wealthy individuals — greater than the combined value of stocks, mutual funds and hedge funds. Fifty-one percent of wealthy homeowners own at least two properties; almost two thirds (63%) of individuals earning more than $300,000 and 74% of penta-millionaires, own more than one property.

“Wealthy individuals are known for their financial savvy and sense of timing,” says Milton Pedraza, CEO of the Luxury Institute. “What these results tell us is that even though home prices may be lower than they were last year, they could go lower still. I’d look for a little more confidence out of this group before we can expect a turnaround in earnest.”

Comment by nhz
2008-04-24 08:39:47

Real estate accounts for 35% of the total assets, on average, of wealthy individuals
and for probably 500% or so of total assets, on average, for less wealthy individuals?

very telling that most of these wealthy people are eyeing homes that are cheaper than what many rather average Americans bought in the last few years.

 
 
Comment by takingbets
2008-04-24 08:37:58

Home builders see a recovery in 2009

Though Behravesh forecast continued recovery throughout 2009 and 2010, he said there is legitimate concern that home prices could again slip in the first quarter of 2009 after the effect of the stimulus package wears off.

http://biz.yahoo.com/cnnm/080424/042408_builders_forecast.html?.v=1

wow, i dident realize that people were going to use those refund checks to buy homes?

 
Comment by takingbets
2008-04-24 09:39:23

New home sales totaled 526,000 during March. On average, economists expected sales of 580,000 units for the month. Month-over-month, sales declined 8.5%. Sales in the prior month declined 5.3% month-over-month to a revised 575,000 units.

Durable goods orders for March slipped 0.3%, but climbed 1.5% when excluding transportation. Economists forecast orders would go unchanged for the month. Excluding transportation, economists predicted orders during March would climb by 0.5%. February’s orders were revised from a decline of 1.7% to a decline of 0.9%. Excluding transportation,

does anyone know why they would exclude transportation? does it drag down the figures?

 
Comment by takingbets
2008-04-24 09:42:11

Congressman Steve Israel Outlines Support for Plan to Help Ease Mortgage Crisis

In its simplest format, Appreciating America is a national plan to help homeowners, and their lenders, whose property is worth less than the original mortgage balance. Often, these properties need to be refinanced due to a resetting ARM which puts the property in danger of foreclosure.

The plan allows homeowners to refinance their “underwater” mortgage up to 85% of the current value of the home. Any remaining balance is put into a second mortgage with no payments for five years. After five years, the homeowner and lender will share in any appreciation of the home to pay off the second loan. The first mortgage offers an affordable monthly payment which prevents financial ruin and foreclosure for the borrower. After a defined period of time, the second mortgage is paid off to the lender, with the lender and borrower sharing in any appreciation on the home.

http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/080424/20080424006087.html?.v=1

 
Comment by exeter
2008-04-24 09:56:18

We’re at the Housing Rent-a-Center phase folks. I saw the first rent to own sign for NEW construction in Westchester County NY.

Any of you HBB’ers see any yet?

Comment by QinQueens
2008-04-24 10:40:54

The closest I’ve seen in all over queens Queens are empty and/or unfinished buildings. However, I’ve seen these things *for a long time*.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-04-24 19:07:17

I’ve seen them listed in Craig’s list. They’re here.

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 09:56:21

Tsarbucks is suffering, comrades.

When a $5 indulgence is no longer within the budget of your customers, it’s time to smell the coffee and start closing stores at the same speed in which they were opened…

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 10:09:41

Lattedeflation in the works? :)

Comment by In Colorado
2008-04-24 10:17:42

Methinks that Dunkin Donuts may emerge as a winner in the froo-froo coffee biz.

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 10:32:29

Not Mc D’s (too plebian), not Starbucks ( too expensive), you may have something there!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2008-04-24 10:51:50

I dunno. Just got back from one where every table was filled and I was the 5th person in line.

Then again, Portland still hasn’t entered the Grief Cycle yet.

Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-04-24 15:04:57

My niece wanted a Sucksbucks gift card for her bday, so I got her one…but it killed me, $50 for that when I could’ve got her a bunch of bags of rice…

 
 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 10:39:52

R.I.P. Van Flipper

(do not disturb, heavy sleeper)

 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 11:04:36

Very OT, can I venture that there is nothing like extremely greasy homemade tacos with the works along with a couple of (hic) Pacificos for an outstanding lunch when you’re reviewing semester projects for little ( and not so little little, older) whining so and so’s for an online class? Grrrrrrr.

Comment by bluprint
2008-04-24 11:39:11

Heh. I just received a grade for a project for an online class. No whining here though.

Comment by Jwhite
2008-04-24 11:56:19

Probably because you did radical things - like reading the syllabus and course schedule…

Comment by bluprint
2008-04-24 12:09:38

Heh. It’s funny how much different of a student I am this time around (I think mainly due to age). I listen to other students and think “how can you do that?” I honestly don’t see how people can get lower than an A in most classes and situations. I mean, read the material, listen in class, do the homework and you are ready for the test. Done.

Even the older students (some older than me) do a lot of complaining that surprises me. On one occasion I had a guy make a comment about how much harder it is “when you have a real job”. It was aimed at me b/c of my grade. I let it drop in that case…I didn’t want to rub in that I probably make quite a bit more than he does at a “real job” AND get better grades.

The best year I ever had (in terms of grades) in college my first time around, was the year I took a manager’s job in the pizza place I worked at. I took it to help support my girlfriend (now wife) who was busy in paramedic school. I was working 50+ hours a week that year (for the first time in my life) and was a full-time student. I think the reason I did so well is that I didn’t have any free time to be distracted. I had a pretty strict schedule of when I worked and when I studied and when I wasn’t doing one I was doing the other. My grades were excellent that year. Perhaps most students just have too much free time.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2008-04-24 12:51:55

Bingo! Most students DO have too much free time.

 
Comment by Blano
2008-04-24 13:29:38

“when I wasn’t doing one I was doing the other.”

And the girlfriend?? :)

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Max
2008-04-24 11:58:32

Kinda awesome, makes you think there’s still hope:

http://www.craigslist.org/about/best/pdx/595286607.html

Comment by CA renter
2008-04-25 04:55:47

Very nice. Thank you for posting that.

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2008-04-24 12:04:04

Methinks that txchick57 won’t like this. It’s about animals being abandoned by foreclosed upon FBs…

http://regulus2.azstarnet.com/blogs/clockingin/8959/help-for-pets-affected-by-foreclosure

Something tells me that these FBs weren’t responsible pet owners before their foreclosures.

 
Comment by txchick57
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-24 12:42:55

Gold getting hammered again today…but don’t worry, Uncle Buck is on his deathbed (at least according to the gold bug swarm).

http://www.marketwatch.com/quotes/?sid=1494329

Comment by aladinsane
2008-04-24 15:52:07

Some people can’t think beyond a day or 2 in advance, et tu Professor?

 
Comment by wjk
2008-04-24 17:33:42

Uncle Buck hit his 50 day moving average today!
He is only down 12% in the last year.
http://quotes.ino.com/chart/?s=NYBOT_DX&v=dmax

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-04-24 19:58:16

The chart I posted appears to go back a whole year, not a couple of days. It shows gold peaking, then either correcting or crashing — too early to say which…

 
 
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-24 17:23:34

AS I can now confirm that I am on ignore:
I hope you are all getting the same signals…
dollar rally set-up into the FED meeting, Commodity run-up has been delayed for the announcement, there is no floor in housing, and the structured Mortgage debt is probably at best worth 30 cents on the dollar, we are at 50% off bubble top housing prices in many cases, the 15 and 30 year rates are still going higher, a disapointing 25bps cut perhaps, and rally for dollar, dollar equities, emerging markets not tied to oil get to run with the bulls, stimulated consumers are settling debts, buying groceries, and looking for really great deals. Oh yeah, China is removing capital controls.

everybody is still looking for S&P500 1401+ big volume up day with treasury sell-off. This was the reason the bond vigilantes even existed.

Comment by vozworth
2008-04-24 18:45:55

Im tellin ya, there is no floor in housing globally……find the kool-aid drinkers in the emerging commodity bubble, dollar rally… the inverted yield curves are about to go bi-polar as the housing bubble de-flates in the globo-bubble.

hold on to 1998 or better transportion…..drive the wheels off the rest of it…then ship it, after you pull the radio and yank off the sweet 20 inch blades w/rims. got my first Caddy today…..euphoric sweet summertime music festival is about to commence….dont get left behind.

dont ever ask me about my first Caddilac…..ever.

Disclaimer: Long GM.

 
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-24 18:49:33

and a Tiffany bracelet for my second sweet sixteen….

true story: 5 years ago, I bot the older daughter the same bracelet, and it was 100 USD more this go round on a promise…… shoulda been long silver/platinum……dang it..

anyway….no more of the precious….just the base.

As above, so below.

 
 
Comment by vozworth
2008-04-24 19:37:31

Hong-Kong is not happy…

tread lightly.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post