April 8, 2006

‘This Is Not Like A Bubble Bursting’ In Reno

The Reno Gazette Journal reports on the housing bubble in Nevada. “In Reno, the median price, where half the 132 homes sold went for more and half for less, for a single-family home was $384,500, down from $412,000 in January but a 6 percent rise since February 2005. In Sparks, the median price was $330,000, up from $325,000 in January and a 6 percent rise from February 2005. The North Valleys slipped to $270,000 in February from $289,000 in January.”

“‘That’s back to a more normal rate of appreciation that we would expect to see, not the 20, 30, 40 percent that we have been seeing in some of these areas over the past couple of years,’ said Brian Kaiser, analyst at UNR. ‘This is what we’ve been expecting to see for quite some time. I’m shocked it took as long as it did to slow down.’”

“The median price of condominiums in Reno slid to $185,000 on 41 units sold in February, down from $242,500 in January but up 6 percent from February 2005. In Sparks, condo prices fell to $179,500 on 12 units sold from $193,950 in January but rose 3 percent, year over year. All this is evidence of a soft landing from the boom that engulfed Northern Nevada during the last couple of years, Kaiser said.”

“‘It absolutely could not maintain the pace that it was maintaining for any length of time without completely pricing everybody out of the market,’ Kaiser said. ‘It’s just not one of those sustainable things that you can have houses going up 20 percent a quarter or year, across the board. This is not like a bubble bursting and suddenly those houses that were worth $400,000 are worth $300,000. That would be a serious situation for the area.’”

“Minden/Gardnerville fell to $402,500 in February from $408,103 in January. Dayton’s median fell to $253,750 from $269,500 in January. Fernley’s median fell to $247,00 from $257,294 in January. Fallon’s median home price fell to $205,000 from $272,500 on just 17 homes sold. The February median still represents a 37 percent rise, year over year.”




RSS feed | Trackback URI

19 Comments »

Comment by Ben Jones
2006-04-08 09:26:34

Thanks to the reader who sent this in.

‘The February median still represents a 37 percent rise, year over year…’This is not like a bubble bursting and suddenly those houses that were worth $400,000 are worth $300,000. That would be a serious situation for the area.’

It is a serious situation, that until a few months ago only bloggers and a few economist were trying to raise awareness about. But with a 37% yoy increase in Fallon, even after a huge haircut, why couldn’t prices fall another 25-33%?

Comment by phucktheflippers
2006-04-08 20:52:26

Phoenix 4/8/2006 41124

7/20/2005 10748
7/21/2005 10968
7/22/2005 11122
7/23/2005 11424
7/24/2005 11338
7/25/2005 11112
7/26/2005 11315
7/27/2005 11353
7/28/2005 11390
7/29/2005 11471
7/30/2005 11656
7/31/2005 11609
8/1/2005 11599
8/2/2005 11590
8/3/2005 11635
8/4/2005 11714
8/5/2005 11710
8/6/2005 12196
8/7/2005 12658
8/8/2005 12919
8/9/2005 13244
8/10/2005 13099
8/11/2005 13245
8/12/2005 13389
8/13/2005 13846
8/14/2005 13801
8/15/2005 13607
8/16/2005 13779
8/17/2005 13992
8/18/2005 14087
8/19/2005 14279
8/20/2005 14321
8/21/2005 14457
8/22/2005 14336
8/23/2005 14391
8/24/2005 14529
8/25/2005 14617
8/26/2005 14792
8/27/2005 15011
8/28/2005 14984
8/29/2005 14803
8/30/2005 15042
8/31/2005 15099
9/1/2005 15063
9/2/2005 15159
9/3/2005 15404
9/4/2005 15699
9/5/2005 15621
9/6/2005 15513
9/7/2005 15913
9/8/2005 16106
9/9/2005 16489
9/10/2005 16716
9/11/2005 16609
9/12/2005 16697
9/13/2005 16538
9/14/2005 16900
9/15/2005 16952
9/16/2005 17419
9/17/2005 17583
9/18/2005 17577
9/19/2005 17636
9/20/2005 17516
9/21/2005 17664
9/22/2005 17883
9/23/2005 18226
9/24/2005 18204
9/25/2005 18196
9/26/2005 18435
9/27/2005 18483
9/28/2005 18605
9/29/2005 18604
9/30/2005 19192
10/1/2005 19333
10/2/2005 19316
10/3/2005 19362
10/4/2005 19463
10/5/2005 19562
10/6/2005 19670
10/7/2005 20052
10/8/2005 20219
10/9/2005 20153
10/10/2005 20324
10/11/2005 20470
10/12/2005 20668
10/13/2005 20850
10/14/2005 21238
10/15/2005 21446
10/16/2005 21463
10/17/2005 21527
10/18/2005 21588
10/19/2005 21795
10/20/2005 21806
10/21/2005 22302
10/22/2005 22719
10/23/2005 22769
10/24/2005 22806
10/25/2005 22976
10/26/2005 23132
10/27/2005 23293
10/28/2005 23681
10/29/2005 23805
10/30/2005 23816
10/31/2005 23790
11/1/2005 23601
11/2/2005 23665
11/3/2005 24193
11/4/2005 24579
11/5/2005 24786
11/6/2005 24717
11/7/2005 24937
11/8/2005 25244
11/9/2005 25333
11/10/2005 25387
11/11/2005 25700
11/12/2005 25685
11/13/2005 25773
11/14/2005 25945
11/15/2005 25913
11/16/2005 25884
11/17/2005 26261
11/18/2005 26098
11/19/2005 26662
11/20/2005 26688
11/21/2005 26684
11/22/2005 26488
11/23/2005 26776
11/24/2005 26819
11/25/2005 26855
11/26/2005 26871
11/27/2005 26890
11/28/2005 26979
11/29/2005 26811
11/30/2005 26797
12/1/2005 26792
12/2/2005 26915
12/3/2005 27238
12/4/2005 27295
12/5/2005 27356
12/6/2005 27387
12/7/2005 27403
12/8/2005 27367
12/9/2005 27649
12/10/2005 27706
12/11/2005 27664
12/12/2005 27512
12/13/2005 27411
12/14/2005 27566
12/15/2005 27517
12/16/2005 27603
12/17/2005 27791
12/18/2005 27776
12/19/2005 27722
12/20/2005 27604
12/21/2005 27554
12/22/2005 27516
12/23/2005 27486
12/24/2005 27311
12/25/2005 27014
12/26/2005 26810
12/27/2005 26822
12/28/2005 26687
12/29/2005 26649
12/30/2005 26547
12/31/2005 26497
1/1/2006 26462
1/2/2006 26401
1/3/2006 26751
1/4/2006 27403
1/5/2006 27564
1/6/2006 28224
1/7/2006 28337
1/8/2006 28542
1/9/2006 28595
1/10/2006 28786
1/11/2006 29222
1/12/2006 29507
1/13/2006 29689
1/14/2006 29899
1/15/2006 30415
1/16/2006 30391
1/17/2006 30707
1/18/2006 30817
1/19/2006 31085
1/20/2006 31457
1/21/2006 31463
1/22/2006 31497
1/23/2006 31607
1/24/2006 31766
1/25/2006 31830
1/26/2006 32142
1/27/2006 32002
1/28/2006 32477
1/29/2006 32458
1/30/2006 32512
1/31/2006 32563
2/1/2006 32684
2/2/2006 33087
2/3/2006 33145
2/4/2006 32953
2/5/2006 33368
2/6/2006 33576
2/7/2006 33550
2/8/2006 33684
2/9/2006 33844
2/10/2006 34234
2/11/2006 34588
2/12/2006 34753
2/13/2006 34815
2/14/2006 34815
2/15/2006 34816
2/16/2006 34816
2/17/2006 35144
2/18/2006 35427
2/19/2006 36260
2/20/2006 35443
2/21/2006 35642
2/22/2006 35503
2/23/2006 35324
2/24/2006 35178
2/25/2006 36388
2/26/2006 36524
2/27/2006 36639
2/28/2006 36174
3/1/2006 36389
3/2/2006 36283
3/3/2006 36811
3/4/2006 36900
3/5/2006 37064
3/6/2006 37217
3/7/2006 36953
3/8/2006 37487
3/9/2006 37626
3/10/2006 37531
3/11/2006 38011
3/12/2006 38184
3/13/2006 38169
3/14/2006 38003
3/15/2006 38197
3/16/2006 38574
3/17/2006 38602
3/18/2006 39074
3/19/2006 38972
3/20/2006 38822
3/21/2006 39159
3/22/2006 38982
3/23/2006 39043
3/24/2006 39271
3/25/2006 39381
3/26/2006 39504
3/27/2006 39817
3/28/2006 39784
3/29/2006 39765
3/30/2006 39948
3/31/2006 40192
4/1/2006 40177
4/2/2006 40182
4/3/2006 40012
4/4/2006 40050
4/5/2006 40332
4/6/2006 40739
4/7/2006 40612
4/8/2006 41124

Comment by ajh
2006-04-09 03:08:54

Much as I like looking at these staggering numbers, I think your series is getting a bit big for 1 line per day. How about reformatting to weekly :cool:.

 
 
 
Comment by Salinasron
2006-04-08 09:44:23

OT…fresno bee…sean snaith….

“There is no sign that the demographic, macroeconomic and financial underpinnings will dissipate. Barring any reversals … the talk of a bubble will just seem like a lot of hot air,” he said.

Hot air is one issue that Sierra Club representative Kevin Hall thinks could crimp the Valley’s growth. The Valley’s notorious air pollution could end up stunting growth.

“Air pollution is the hidden cost of living and doing business in the Valley,” Hall said.

 
Comment by Salinasron
2006-04-08 09:50:37

I interviewed for a Professor teaching position at the Univ. of Nevada Medical School in Reno in 1976. I spent three days there and part of the time was spent with a realtor to show me the area. At that time they told me that they had a limited supply of water, banking was difficult because of the transient population, and other negatives; they didn’t want me to take the position and then quit after a year or two so they were up front on everything. I chose to take a position at a hospital in Kern County CA instead.

 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2006-04-08 09:52:12

Reno is a speculative second home type of market you would think.
I can’t see any reason why the market there would not fall more . That 37% bump they got in 2005 was speculator/flipper driven which is always a weak market in the long run.Don’t think baby boomers want to move to that cold of a area either.

 
Comment by johndicht
2006-04-08 09:57:51

It’s always tiring to try to talk to a person that don’t get the basic economic principles. My strategy now is keep my mouth shut and just let reality play out with them and teach them a lesson.

Comment by waitingitout
2006-04-08 13:00:25

I agree. I keep trying to tell people the situation, but all I get is “uh-huh, so how was your weekend”. Or “well that may happen in certain areas, but not XYZ city”. I mean you can’t deny the numbers, the history and the basic common sencse. So, I’m done too. I’ve given people all the info I can and now it’s up to them to make a decision.

I also think that a lot of people never lived through the depression, the oil crisis in the 70’s or a natural disaster (as I had the luxury of last summer). Some people have no concept of how quickly heaven can become hell. And more importantly how humans react to tough times. So if you have only seen good times, then hearing about the potential for bad times to come is just unthinkable. It’s the “not going to happen to me” syndrome.

I hope that things don’t get too bad for people, because we all suffer when they do. I hope for the best, but I plan for the worst.

 
 
Comment by stjoe
2006-04-08 09:58:26

I live in Reno. A number of homes in the upscale neighborhoods are being bought by young retirees from California. They sell their home, move to Nevada and buy a larger home for half the money. They invest the rest and use it to live on.

Comment by homepop
2006-04-08 14:41:06

We sold out house in Davis for a nice profit and moved to Reno to semi-retire. I don’t know where these “young retirees” (I guess we would qualify, being 57) are finding larger homes for less than half the money. Reno prices per square foot are getting very close to prices in the Sacramento area and surrounding areas. And the market in the Central Valley areas are tanking, so that supply of buyers is drying up. What you are saying was true in the past, but not now.

 
 
Comment by nnvmtgbrkr
2006-04-08 10:00:11

The industry folks are freakin’ out here. They were all kidding themselves about a coming Spring bounce because that’s exactly what happened last year here. But by this time last year everything was rolling again after a slow Feb & March. Now, the snow is melting, the flowers are coming out, and it’s as dead as it’s been since I started in this biz in ‘94. (That’s right, it wasn’t this dead even in the mid 90’s, our last slow cycle) My office has only done a handful of purchase deals this entire year, with most of the business being “bail-out-of-the-adjustable” refi’s. With interest rates up we’ve been able to provide little relief for those folks.

I just checked our inventory numbers this morning and we had a big bounce last night. Also, seems like we got hit with a FSBO virus over the last couple of days too. It looks like the wall of denial is coming down. The “fear” is in the air.

My prediction? This joker with the RGJ was making light of a 25% decrease, but that number is conservative. The outskirt areas that saw the boom last will have the least depreciation due to the fact they didn’t appreciate that much. But the 395 corridor from Reno to Gardnerville will most likely see a 30%-40% hit, easy. From what I’ve seen, from last summer we’ve already seen a 5%-10% decrease.

Comment by homepop
2006-04-08 10:34:30

Prices in Reno declined 6.7% from January to February 2006. It only takes a few more months of that kind of decline to get your 25% decrease. Is that so unlikely, Mr. Kaiser?

 
 
Comment by Salinasron
2006-04-08 10:04:47

OT but from a report on Texas and water:

With the State’s escalating demand for municipal water comes increasing anxiety about water shortages. The Governor’s task force in 2000 identified limited water supply as one of the two “most serious natural resource issues facing Texas today” (Wagner & Kreuter, 2002). Part of the reason for this concern is the fact that conventional fresh water supplies in Texas are already 75%-80% developed (Texas Water Development Board, 1995) whereas the population of the state is anticipated to double in the next 50 years (National Wildlife Federation, et al., 2001).
For all you buyers of Texas property ….lots of land, maybe little water.

Comment by russell
2006-04-08 19:58:40

Water is a big issue. I live in the dallas/fort worth area….and am familiar with the DFW real estat market. Some municipalities are taxing property to the tune of 1% of value per year.

A definite uptick in prices due to the adoption recently of option arm loans and investors arriving buying multiple properties because ‘these things are so cheap’.

They don’t realize taxes will eat them up, we are on the edge of where the desert starts, the air is close to the dirtiest in the nation, and there is so much area being developed that it is just a matter of time before there is much pain…….NO ONE LEARNED THEIR LESSON FROM THE EIGHTIES….THERE ARE STILL FOUNDATIONS SITTING IN ROCKWALL FROM 1984 THAT ARE ABANDONED!

 
 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2006-04-08 11:16:21

Water is a issue we do not talk about to much on this site . Water prices could skyrocket in the future also. So what if you have alot of land , if you don’t have water what good is it ?

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2006-04-08 11:47:16

Colorado Springs is going into its eighth year of drought, yet the city planners, who appear to be completely in the pocket of developers, steadfastly refuse to put any curbs on suburban sprawl and overbuilding. The last drought of this magnitude, back in the 1300s, lasted fifty years and forced the original inhabitants (the Pueblo Indians) the completely abandon the Front Range area. No wonder local realtors don’t like to talk about the water shortage.

 
 
Comment by HousingBear
2006-04-08 11:51:28

I know someone who moved from the Bay Area in 2005 and bought a $1M home in Reno with $10K down, $800K I/O, and $190K HELOC @ 8 3/4%.

Now, what do you think will happen to this guy? I tried to talk him out of buying, but of course I am the “stupid moron” for not following all the sheeple off the cliff into the abyss by doing this type of transaction.

We will see who the “stupid moron” is. LOL

Comment by Foose
2006-04-08 17:46:50

holly crap!!!

 
 
Comment by stjoe
2006-04-08 13:01:52

The house across the street from me (I live in an upper middle class (self-employed, MDs, small business owners) has been listed three times during the past 12-15 months. I believe it started out at either $625 or $650. It got listed yesterday. New asking price is $550.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post