Bits Bucket And Weekend Topic Suggestions!
Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.
Examining the home price boom and its effect on owners, lenders, regulators, realtors and the economy as a whole.
Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.
Banking On Incompetence & Theft…
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/JE23Dj01.html
(talking about Dutch gas prices)
“out of that $9.45, “70% goes to the government in taxes”.
now you understand why a country with less than 17 million citizens can spend 25-30 billion every year in homeowner subsidies … Our finance minister Wouter Bos is not worried at all about the national budget, they simply keep inventing new energy/environmental taxes every month which are all flowing directly into government coffers to help those poor Dutch homeowners get even more filthy rich.
If car drivers start using more efficient cars (there is a clear shift in that direction lately), energy taxes will get even higher to compensate. Increasing property taxes is a no-no here, even though they are extremely low compared to most other countries.
–
The Dutch have been ruled by financier class longer than the Brits and Americans. There is no business like debt business to feed the rentier class. Asset bubbles come in very handy to push more debt on the public, both as taxpayers as well as individuals. Subsidies are one way to push more debt and bribe the public.
We tend to forget the Dutch roots.
Jas
This is colorful talk, but loaded with the usual casual sloppy errors. Dutch roots are commerce and capitalism which enrich buyers and sellers alike. There are lots of taxes on the Dutch, but the bulk of fuel tax money goes to road building, pollution mitigation, and infrastructure to keep the ocean out. Dutch taxes are high, but so are benefits and relative levels of satisfaction. The article and this commentary ignore basic realities. The quip about US tax revenue always being 20% of GDP is utterly pathetic lying about the Reagan tax increase which happened almost thirty years ago, but as always math becomes hard when it gets too close to personal agendas.
–
“Dutch roots are commerce and capitalism which enrich buyers and sellers alike.”
I agree and I am an admirer of the Dutch. They took over form the Italians (Venice, especially) and brought trade and commerce advantage to N-W Europe. English followed the Dutch to Indian trade and did one better by a smart treaty (spices to the Dutch and fabric to the English).
You are reading too much in my narrow comment on the Dutch financier/rentier class.
Jas
Mole Man is clearly not well informed about the Dutch budget (or he buys into all the government rhetoric). The Dutch spend more on homeowner subsidies than on healthcare and education together (but they still think they are a ‘knowledge economy’). What they spend on protection of the environment is close to nothing (just a few % of homeowner subsidies) and spending on flood protection has been extremely low too over the last 10-20 years.
Of those homeowner subsidies (both for owners and for renters) by far the biggest chunk goes into the pockets of a relatively small and relatively wealthy part of the citizens, those who don’t need it. It’s Robin Hood in reverse.
Yes, social security is nice if you cannot or don’t want to work, but I don’t consider that a benefit. We have loads of people who are perfectly able to work but never did so and have always lived the good life despite not working. We also get the worst immigrants in Europe, the real parasites - those that know you can get loads of money and free goodies (including a free home) here without ever working. Immigrants that are willing to work to get ahead choose other countries.
Jas has a point though. The rentier class ruled the Netherlands after the gilded age during the 17th century for two centuries. Long after the commerce and capitalism were taken over by the British. Most of the rents came from abroad though.
I’m not as discontent as NHZ and I’m reasonably ok with our “benefits and relative levels of satisfaction”. I hate to subsidise home-owners and the killing of Afghans, though.
–
“The rentier class ruled the Netherlands after the gilded age during the 17th century for two centuries.”
That is where the American revolutionaries went to borrow money in 1770s. Person for person the Dutch were the best at commerce and later at finance.
Jas
Mole Man is wrong about GDP. That approximately 20% figure has withstood the test of time since the 1950s, no matter which way the taxes go, up or down. When GDP increases, more money comes in (at the same approximately 20% level by comparison) and when GDP decreases, less money comes in (at the same approximately 20% level by comparison). The supposed lesson from this is that if the government wants more money, it needs to boost GDP, not inhibit it.
Here in the U.S., most of the money we pay at the pump is taxes. For an increasingly socialistic, goody-twoshoes government (actually a collection of governments) hellbent on telling everyone how not to behave, what to wear, and how not to consume oil, ours certainly seems to rely heavily on the very things it denounces: smoking, drinking, and driving in excess. If all the smokers and drinkers and SUV drivers stopped tomorrow, the country would collapse from lack of associated taxes.
If politicians, former and present, are serious about changing our behavior, they should stop benefiting from the things they don’t like. When Al Gore stops flying around in a private jet and selling and buying bogus carbon credits (made up out of thin–or is it think?–air), and starts walking or riding a bike, I may take him more seriously.
the Dutch rentier class:
towards the end of the 17th century, wealthy Dutchies found out that you could get rich much easier by NOT working and just providing finance. The country has gone downhill ever since. Where did the Americans get their bright ideas about the New Finance Economy?
(and yes, the first Dutch housing bubbles appeared on stage together with their finance economy).
Please excuse my sloppy misspellings and typos. “Goody Two-Shoes,” “benefitting,” etc. instead of what I typed. I’m definitely spaztastic!
Kevin Phillips “American Theocracy” discusses how the Dutch began their economic ascent through hard work and engineering ingenuity (advanced camshafts, automatic windmill sail adjustments), then depleting massive deposits of energy (whale oil), and then rentier economics.
How much petroleum can be pumped out of the Netherlands or its territories? How much are the Dutch willing to pay to have sailors and soldiers at the ready to secure foreign supplies of petroleum? Perhaps their tax on gasoline is designed to represent the real cost of the commodity, regardless of how those revenues are ultimately spent.
I don’t know about this taxes being 20% of GDP theory. I do know this: spending IS taxing, whether you levy the taxes today or tomorrow.
Hey spaztic, riding a bicycle to and from speeches would take a long time. Well it would…..
Hey maybe we could get “enviro W” to do that after he retires to speech or mangling speech events. Then we will see his crawford place is/was just for getting elected.
Mr environment could take commercial flights. I guess thats too middle class for the hypocrite.
$9.45.. per US gallon, I take it? And people here in the USA think we have it bad!
Unfortunately for the USA, I can see the beginnings of a movement to do the same property-price propping that the Dutch seem to be doing. Whether it is surreptitious scheming driving this or inadvertent blundering, I cannot say. (Though what was the quote? “Don’t assume evil intent when it can be simply explained as gross incompetence”, something like that?)
Congress’s moves to offload crappy mortgages at 85% on the dollar to government-guaranteed entities is one such example, but many others abound in their nest of schemes. And once in place, these programs almost never go away.
The question is, of course, who will pay for it in the end if it all falls apart, since Congress is not anticipating actually covering any losses (the fools!). Looks like the Dutch have it covered with a massive gasoline tax, though. And probably more taxes besides. Ouch. Which is what Congress will end up doing when it all falls in a heap.
I thought it was “never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.”
Exactly! Thank you!
There should be a similar saying involving conspiracy theories and profit motive.
yes, gas is over $ 9.50 now in Netherlands.
I agree that the US is probably looking at the Netherlands for ways to prop up the housing market (they are also dabbling with a lot of ideas from the new Dutch healthcare system). Many of the proposals of the last year or so for the housing market sound too familiar to me, and I can assure you they work (for some time). The question remains if these tricks will work in a market where the psychology has shifted in reverse. But I guess it is pretty easy to fool the average American into consuming more.
$9.50 is relative though.
If the average MPG of a Dutch car is twice the average MPG of an American car (and I mean Dutch and American person who owns it not produced by the Dutch or Americans) then the relative cost of gas is $4.25 in The Netherlands. Just a hair higher than in the USA.
At some point, you can’t get blood from a stone. The American consumer on average is tapped out. We’ve just completed a 10 year run of easy credit. Most people CAN’T consume at this point. Its not like Americans stopped because they smartened up due to economic downturn… they literally cannot pay their bills.
“Its not like Americans stopped because they smartened up due to economic downturn…they literally cannot pay their bills.”
Exactly right, Ed. The middle-class consumer is tapped-out and running around in circles, like Nikolai Chauchescu looking for an exit.
–
“Unfortunately for the USA, I can see the beginnings of a movement to do the same property-price propping that the Dutch seem to be doing.”
There was a huge push to prop up prices in the US during 1920s (farm products) and early 1930s with various govt finance programs. Later FDR resorted to depreciating the currency via gold-price manipulation. After all was said in done, things weren’t any better for the economy and the populace by early 1939. Interventions are very tempting and that is what politicians do to appease the public but they only postpone the inevitable adjustment and make things worse, long-term.
Jas
what was the downside if nothing was done during that time? a *bolshevik* revolution like in russia.
–
I seriously doubt. When people don’t have faith in their principles the slippery slope presents itself as an alternative.
Jas
The goal is to twofold:
- Keeping asset prices inflated for the parasite class.
- Prevent the working class from being able to afford to buy a house and pay it off: force them to rent all their lives from either the bank or a landlord. Same idea with the absurd amount of debt most people have, where they put everyone on the credit card and wind up paying for even things like a Big Mac for 20 years.
But this is what makes the parasite class rich, so don’t expect it to change.
sounds like feudalism to me.
“The question is, of course, who will pay for it in the end if it all falls apart, since Congress is not anticipating actually covering any losses (the fools!).”
They’ll simply borrow the money, and then, on election night eve, the Deficit Fairy will come and wave her magic wand….
If car drivers start using more efficient cars (there is a clear shift in that direction lately), energy taxes will get even higher to compensate. Increasing property taxes is a no-no here, even though they are extremely low compared to most other countries.
This is what the US should be doing. Taxing gas and oil in order to keep income taxes lower is the best idea around. If oil goes to $2-300/bl the Dutch people will still be able to get to work because their society is designed around expensive energy. The US on the other hand will be screwed unable to fill the SUV for the 50 mile commute. Unable to heat the 4000 sq foot home for two.
yes, I’m in favor of energy taxes as long as:
1. proceeds are used for stimulating alternatives (= research and investment) and paying for pollution that is caused bu the consumption (e.g. CO2 storage), and not just to plug holes in the budget.
2. big users pay the same tax as the small guy (in Netherlands the big energy users like airlines pay no or little energy taxes)
Why have idiot level energy taxes if it mostly serves to support all kinds of unrelated spending like overly expensive (and as such energy inefficient) homes? I really doesn’t make any sense except that the average guy will get pretty much pissed off after some time.
I doubt if everybody here will be able to get to work if prices double again. In the outer regions of the country there often are no alternatives for using a car, and even here many people live to far from work to use a bike. Outside the big cities public transport is almost nonexistent (like one bus every two hours or so if you are lucky; not an option for home-work travel).
I’ve been in Holland and getting around without a car is 10x as easy as most places in the US and buss service could easily be ramped up. Not sure how the gas tax is used to support home prices though? I wouldn’t care if it got diverted to other causes that income/sales taxes would normally support.
MEaston: I guess you have visited the ‘Randstad’ then because getting around without a car outside that area is often pretty tough (especially outside business hours). No, buss service cannot easily be ramped up, it is being phased out in large parts of the country; this is a trend that has been going on for years and will continue. In my part of the country many people expect that even the trains will disappear in about 10 years (it will be only available for commercial freight, not for passengers).
So the only remaining options are working close to home or using a car.
Does anyone here actually know anyone who has an SUV an commutes 50 miles? I mean that is the standard these days. Americans are all driving 6 liter V8s and spending 2 hours in traffic every morning to drive to the 5000 sq ft McMansion in the suburb.
I have never had a commute longer than 15 miles and I can’t think of anyone I know that lives more than 20 miles from work. And the one guy I know who lives out in the ‘burbs, drives a Mini which I think gets something like 40 MPG.
This is one of those stereotypes that while true for the off person here and there is non-existent for the majority of the population.
have a nephew in Orlando who commutes about 25 miles each way to work. and to blow a hole in our basic stereotype, he doesn’t live in a McMansion…but switched jobs about 18 months ago and went from a 9-mile commute to what he’s got now. I think he drives the minivan. What do they get, about 28 mpg?
Up until March, I was commuting about 2 miles to work. I have a full size truck, but only had to fill up about once a month. Gas could have gone to $5 and it wouldn’t have effected me much at all (as far as direct fuel costs).
In March, the wife and I moved. She is closer to work now (drives a v6 mustang) but I’m commuting even further than she was before. I keep forgetting to check the milage, but it’s probably over 50 miles. It takes me just under an hour, I’m pulling 80 most of the way. I put $91 in fuel in my vehicle the other day, that’s a record for me.
I also just accepted a new job much closer. I’ll be starting on the 23rd of next Month. That will get me to a more reasonable fuel usage level…I expect it to cut my fuel usage in half.
Incidentally, the new job is at a state university. So, if I decide to stick around for 20 years, I’ll get to suckle on the government tit for the later part of my life. I just want to thank you (any Arkansas tax payers) in advance.
It is my understanding that a vehicle gets better gas mileage on the open road at 55-65 mpg than ‘around town’–stop and go.
My 12 year old economy car 30-33 on the hwy and 20-25 ‘around town’.
My golden retriever’s ford explorer sport gets 18-22 on the hwy and is parked otherwise.
Me…my commute is 64 miles each way. We live in metro Atlanta. My husband is able to telecommute a couple days/week, but that’s not an option for me. I hope to move in the summer of ‘09, so this isn’t going to be a problem forever. And I drive an older Accord, which gets about 32 MPG.
Who needs to drive when you have Smart Shops?
smart shops AND the most generous social security system on the planet …
Too bad they just closed the biggest smart shop in the country this week (too many legal violations …). Maybe some people will have to start thinking about working again (fortunately some have enough brain damage to be oblivious to the issue).,
BFB - funny, I like it.
The Financial Furry Freak Brothers…
http://goldnews.bullionvault.com/gold_fiat_money_ferguson_steil_052220083
Psychotropics and housing -
Ain’t that the truth?
Chortle,
Leigh
The Yippies of the 70’s jokingly threatened to spike the DC and other cities water supplies with LSD.
In any event , the Washington Political Cult appear to have aquired a taste for ACID or some other mind altering drug and have been heavily tripping ever since
Actually, Grace Slick (Grace Wing at the time) attended the same prestigious prep school as one of Nixon’s daughter’s and was thus invited to a reception at the White House, around 1970 I believe. She brought Abby Hoffman as her escort and a vial of LSD which she wanted to spike Nixon’s tea with. She didn’t get the chance, but it is a legendary episode in the annals of Psychedelic History.
Do a search on YouTube for Grace Slick and there is a short video of her talking about it.
I was going to school and working in DC at the time. One of the nurses I worked with was going with the officer in charge Nixion’s Presidential yacht ‘Sequoia’ when he and the whole frigging crew was busted for using grass
which she wanted to spike Nixon’s tea with
Nixon on acid? That hurts my head just thinking about it.
Geez, and I thought all this time he’d been using it daily!
1970 home ec class. someone got suspended from school for spiking the course of the day with lsd to Vice principal.
That was when boys were finally allowed into HomeEc.
hehe
“Once a man worries, he clings to anything out of desperation; and once he clings he is bound to get exhausted or to exhaust whomever or whatever he is clinging to.”
Carlos Castaneda
You can substitute woman in that sentance too.
EU bubble update:
Today some Spanish friends were visiting so I asked them about the Spanish housing market. They confirmed that prices are going down, and not just on the Costas; many people are worrying about their mortgage payment that is going up. Most Spanish mortgages are tied to the LIBOR rate (unlike some other EU markets like Netherlands). Latest trend: people are advised to switch to a mortgage in Yen, so it is still affordable (still many clueless advisors out there …). That will probably delay the downslide but it will end badly, just like in Hungary, Latvia and some other EU countries with mortgages in foreign currencies.
May be of interest
http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11412518
Spain and Ireland stand out as economies that have been dominated by housing. According to Goldman Sachs, construction and housing-related employment in both countries made up 13% of all private-sector jobs at the end of last year, against 9% in America and 5% in Germany. Meanwhile, nominal residential investment was 11% of GDP in Ireland and 9% in Spain, against 6% in America.
That has caused a glut. More than 4m Spanish dwellings have been built over the past decade, according to Britain’s Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors. Its survey of European property suggests that far more Spanish houses were being built last year than are likely to be needed in steady market conditions, let alone a slump.
One in every 7 houses in Ireland is vacant
(article is from 2006)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Property_Bubble
yes, there was overbuilding in Spain (although most of all overbuilding of larger family homes, there is still a shortage of affordable homes for 1-2 person households, just like in many other EU countries).
On the other side: Spain is not building just for the Spanish, a big chunk of the construction is for citizens from other EU countries (UK, Ireland, Netherlands, Germany etc.). I guess there are at least 5 million EU citizens who have permanently moved to Spain, and many more who have a vacation home (or several investment properties) there.
The big question is what happens with all those homes owned by foreigners. Are they going to sell, or are they going to stay put? I guess many will stay put as long as possible, because they have learned in their home market that prices always go up (they did for the last 10-25 years, depending on country). And I heard from several sources that selling now on the Costas is nearly impossible anyway, too many sellers and not enough buyers.
The Spanish market and the other EU bubble markets are strongly linked because everything is financed (leveraged) with other home equity; when one of these markets really starts to tumble watch out below.
Watched a UK show on Brits having to give back their new self designed holiday home because of money. Fortunately they were able to get their $ back and return it to the bank.
I got into it late, so don’t know the particulars, just watching them walk away from sunny Spain locale muttering how they built their dream home for someone else.
there was a recent show on BBC where a couple had to abandon their Spanish dream home because it was built without official building permit (happened a lot on the Costas, especially around Marbella because of the extremely corrupt government there). A new highway will be running right through their property within a few years and they didn’t know if the government will pay them any compensation for having to abandon the home (probably not, there are more examples).
In general it seems that homes at the Spanish Costas are selling for less then their purchased price of a few years ago, despite the fact that officially prices are much (50-100%) higher than a few years ago. So probably the statistics are lying. Or all these foreigners have a tough time finding a buyer and are the exception to the rule (there is more Spain then just the Costas). Credit is still plentiful in Europe, but maybe buyers are disappearing in this area because speculators have moved to greener pastures near the EU borders, and the dumb money has enough Spanish homes by now.
OTOH a lot of mortgages in Russia are in USD. Interest rates for dollars are lower than for rubles, which is rather comical considering that the dollar has lost over 20% against the ruble in the last few years.
Russia is one of the few countries that has no incentive to devalue its currency against the USD or Euro. It exports only commodities (the biggest being oil of course) which are insensitive to exchange rates, and it imports a lot of consumer goods from Europe (high end) and China (low end), so it has an incentive to maintain a strong ruble.
The appreciating rate of the ruble against the USD, which can be seen at the exchange booths which are everywhere, is a potent symbol of the recovery of Russia and the decline of the US.
Property prices in St. Petersburg, Russia are far higher than in greater Chicago, IL. Chicago incomes are much higher though. I always assumed this was because of the artificial shortage of property that could be freely bought or sold.
However, my wife found out on a recent trip, that Russian food prices now approach US prices. Bread and tea is still cheap but basic vegetables, onions and cabbage, are more expensive that Chicago. Meat was usually cheaper in Chicago.
The country of Russia might do well but somehow I doubt this will end well for the Russian people.
But a Safe/hotel provided cab ride in Rus is $50 USD vs a unsafe non hotel found cab at $3.00. But you takes your chances.
Dang Ben - do you ever rest luv?
News we knew - take care my Cali friends~
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
East Bay’s water district declares water emergency, imposes water rationing
snip…
“”The rationing is a result of record dry spells in March and April combined with a Sierra snowpack that has yielded half of what is normally expected in runoff.”"
http://www.bizjournals.com/eastbay/stories/2008/05/12/daily53.html
You read this Lad? You’ve been saying this all along.
He hasn’t been predicting water rationing or limits or any such thing.
What he’s basically been saying is “what is anyone’s house worth in California when there’s no water anymore.”
We’re a very long way from having no water anymore.
There are over 40 million Californians, and we are in the 2nd year of the worst 1-2 punch drought i’ve ever seen, and each of us got into the habit of using over 100 gallons a day, per person.
Local & state government is terrified to tell their constituency what is really happening, as there’s no plan B.
San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Diego import virtually all of their water from somewhere else.
It’s too late (the real problems will be painfully obvious by late summer) to do anything, because the only quick option would have to been to built desalination plants, but we didn’t.
When I lived in Anaheim Hills I was amazed at the tropical landscaping, the daily watering, and the streams that would flow down the street gutters in the morning.
IMO SoCal will be enforcing xeriscape landscaping in the future, just like we mandate in new areas of AZ.
test
Yeess?
you have e-mail!
Credit crunch ‘to get worse before upturn’
Date: 23 May 2008
By Lindsay McIntosh
THE economic squeeze will “get worse before it gets better”, experts warned yesterday, as the UK’s biggest building society admitted its new mortgage lending dropped by more than half last year.
And a housing charity warned Scotland is no longer “insulated” against a market fallout. (cont’d)
http://news.scotsman.com/scotlandseconomy/Credit-crunch-to-get-worse.4113905.jp
An Inquiry Into Interbank Loan Rate
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/23/business/23rate.html?ref=business
Some now worry that system may have enabled banks to manipulate Libor to their advantage. Analysts and industry professionals said some banks quoted lower rates to allay concern about their finances or reduce their borrowing costs during a time of financial stress. Quotes from all banks are published on the association’s Web site.
Banks are misleading to manipulate? Is that a surprise???
Oh, now we learn the LIBOR prices the interest rate on $360 trillion globally. Last week an article said it priced $62 trillion of financial products.
So, to keep things in perspective:
A one percent change in the LIBOR causes a $3.6 trillion interest rate change of this $360 trillon. A one basis point change causes a $36 billion interest rate change.
These are some very big bucks, folks. And the integrity behind the LIBOR is questionable.
See, math can be fun after all!
US Automakers still hanging their hopes on trucks and SUVs.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/ford-shifts-output-toward-cars/story.aspx?guid=%7B0F5B2D07%2DDC18%2D4C1B%2DB9DC%2D8B464FE47D4F%7D
Get a Rope!
What is really dumb about this is that both Ford and GM have a fine portfolio of fuel efficient cars overseas. AFAIK each only sells a few each (Saturn Astra, Chevy Aveo, Ford Focus).
A quick look at Ford’s UK website shows quite a few models that get 40 mpg+ on the highway.
40 mpg in the UK is an Imperial Gallon, 4.54 liters not the US Gallon (3.78 liters)
True, but they had vehicles that were rated at 60+. My point is that Ford has the cars.
And your point is valid. Check out the Ford Verve and other nice looking smaller cars that are offered overseas. It’s just clear that the auto companies want consumers to stay in their large SUVs and other vehicles with little technology that have the tooling paid for decades ago. Seriously - outside of cosmetic, technology, and safety changes, how much different is a 2008 Tahoe from a 1978 Suburban?
Maybe better engine technology, but when it has to push a 7000+ lb behemoth around, there’s only so much it can do. Plus I would also wager that the Tahoe has far more ponies under the hood.
It’s just clear that the auto companies want consumers to stay in their large SUVs and other vehicles with little technology that have the tooling paid for decades ago.
No doubt about that. The profit margins on the behemoths were huge.
Seriously - outside of cosmetic, technology, and safety changes, how much different is a 2008 Tahoe from a 1978 Suburban?
Well, if you exclude those changes, there hasn’t really been much change since Henry Ford ditched the electric car in favor of the ones with an internal combustion engine in 1914.
You know I was thinking of that after I wrote it, I mean Boeing is still building airplanes with 1903 technology, right?
To rephrase my point, the SUV is the vehicle with the least amount of advancements and the highest profit margin. Take a pickup truck frame, remove the bed, add another row of seats, and sell it as a safety wagon to someone for $45,000 with $20,000 of labor and materials used to produce it.
Cars have changed drastically, with unibody construction requiring precise welding and assembly and space age frames to keep occupants safe. Trucks still lumber on with a frame that when hit will transport the shock to less rigid objects (i.e. human bodies), while cars will crush to dissipate the energy.
There have been much more changes to cars than trucks and that’s a key reason that trucks remain large profit centers.
“You know I was thinking of that after I wrote it, I mean Boeing is still building airplanes with 1903 technology, right?”
Not at all. New generation is carbon fiber reinforced plastic (about 35 tons).
Started out with stretched cloth in 1916, now it is stretched plastic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_787
Sorry, missed irony again
If you really think about it, we really haven’t gotten that far from the times of abacus and pigeon mail. It’s the same, only different.
a 2008 suburban is probably 2000 pounds heavier than a 1978 model, probably due to extra safety and luxury because in 1978 the suburban was basically considered an enclosed work truck, not a status symbol. Also a 1978 small block 350 got around 200hp and returned probably 12-13 mpg in the suburban, with virtually no emission controls; the current 5.3 small block is around 320 hp and gets 20mpg on the highway even under the new ratings, and despite the extra weight. in the base model vette that engine (aluminum and enlarged to 6.2 liters) gets around 430 hp and returns 26 on the highway (obviously a much lighter and more aerodynamic vehicle). there have been great advancements in the engine technology even though the basic shape and engine design of the vehicle is similar (people love to rip on the SBC because it was originally designed in the ’50s, but its pretty much bulletproof and because of its very compact OVH design it has a higher power per weight than just about anything, including german and italian exotics). Its wrong to assume there haven’t been advancements.
Also, someone said up above that GM and Ford have great products in europe, which is true - I just cannot for the life of me understand why they won’t sell them here; the only somewhat smart reason I can think of is that they would be way too expensive given the value of the dollar (the general must be losing thousands on every Opel (oops I mean Saturn) Astra sold here since they are built in belgium)
“Take a pickup truck frame, remove the bed, add another row of seats, and sell it as a safety wagon to someone for $45,000 with $20,000 of labor and materials used to produce it.“
They’ve got less than $10k in ‘em. The 1/2-ton PU running gear is also used on their commercial passenger vehicles such as fire, police, and taxi.
FWIW, here’s a UK media piece on one of the Fords. Appears to have top billing in their Eco-car popularity scale.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/motors/ken_gibson/article1196627.ece
Record drop in home prices, this info’s probably already been posted but it’s a decent article.
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Banking/HomebuyingGuide/HomePriceReport.aspx
They are still clinging to the fantasy here that Dallas prices “increased” during the same period.
Try telling that to anyone trying to sell here.
Tsk, tsk,tsk. How DARE you contradict http://www.dfwhousingfacts.org
I had to pay extra to have that URL subliminally painted across the front of my house.
Matt, I may have to kill you. I got this far in life without seeing that bilge. Now I”m pissed off.
Hehe, it took so long to come up I thought that maybe Ben was seriously against non-paying propaganda
You sure have to appreciate subtle, ,credible, well-reasoned and balanced sites like that one, eh?
I’m suprised they didn’t have flashing messages and dancing-mortgage-ad icons there as well.
OK, here it is, all the RE tripe in one handy dandy list (from Matt’s link):
TOP 10 REASONS TO BUY A NEW HOME NOW
Get more house for your money
Your dollar goes further in D/FW whether you choose a home ready for move-in or to build from the ground up.
Low Interest Rates
Todays extremely low interest rates allow you to buy more home than ever before with a 30-year fixed rate mortgage.
Location. Location. Location.
No matter where you work or want to live, you’ll find brand new homes in great locations across the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex. Near lakes, near the airport, near work centers and schools…just minutes from everything you need.
Tax Benefits
Homeownership is a solid investment in the D/FW area and provides you with tax advantages through deductions for mortgage interest and taxes.
Great Selection
Right now, you’ll find the best selection of new completed homes in many years.
Strong local economy and good job growth
You can feel confident that the Dallas/Fort Worth area will continue to grow. Its location in the center of the country along with Texas’ pro-business, entrepreneurial attitude will keep Dallas/Fort Worth as the one of the top growth markets in the country.
Stable Home Prices
Home prices in the Dallas/Fort Worth area have maintained slow, steady growth so values should continue to increase.
Quality Construction & the latest design in NEW homes
Dallas/Fort Worth builders are at the forefront of new home design trends and feature exceptional quality finishes and construction compared to many parts of the country. New homes also offer warranties and require less maintenance than pre-owned homes.
Technology, energy and resource efficiency
New homes offers the latest energy efficient construction methods, materials, appliances and heating and cooling systems to provide you better, more comfortable living…and save you money
Equity
“New homes also offer warranties and require less maintenance than pre-owned homes.”
Certain thoughts can not easily be juxtapositioned without mental contortions, unless you are a professional…
dfw = Dead Fvcking Wrong?
worse than trying to sell is someone trying to buy! the banks are pathetic in their efforts to work with you. even as a cash buyer, they want to shop your offer around for weeks. the realtors can only think in terms of what the banks are asking and have no idea of how to make offers of less than 95% of asking price. Then within 30 days or less the same property is much below the former 95% of asking price the realtor suggested. we have a long ways to go to get to the bottom.
and pity the poor sould with a contingency offer of having to sell their home or qualify for a loan.
On the selling side soon, I’m suddenly ticked at all you low ballers. I’ll price to current market, or even less (if I win the fight vs my wife), then you guys come in worried about FUTURE price drops and rain on my parade. Where’s the optimism gone in this country? Be a man, overpay!
are you in Southlake? Lots of stuff for sale there?
Matt, send me your asking price and I’ll make a lowball.
Nah, Grapevine. We are housing bubble relative innocents here.
Lots of high end stuff for sale on my drive to work through Southlake, though.
One example area flooded with yard signs:
I see one new mansion owner (late last year, IIRC) is either building a mother-in-law sub-mansion behind the hacienda or is building a few more SUV stalls.
Google Earth: 32°58′10.53″N, 97°10′3.81″W
West across the street from this are two spec homes. At least one is still up for sale. Fancy stone and wood work, copper on the roofs, garages through courtyards (no portcullis though), metal fencing, etc.
Covered by Google Earth street view at 2280 N. Peytonville Ave, Southlake, TX 76092
More construction on the several proto-mansions east of him (or some of it may be stalled construction) and several realty signs North and East across the street, and also the mansion immediately South of him.
Realty Trac has 1150 sites in zip 76092, but only has 2 of the many I mentioned above.
And thanks to Lost for the, err, “support”.
I may take you up on it if we get one of those mythical “reasonable” offers. I know I can count on my HBB friends to send in “insulting” ones to make the R’s stand out
I tried to submit a short sale offer myself late last year (no realtor on either side). I did up a nice package showing all the foreclosures in the area, etc. The bank blew me off because the borrower was current on his payments. So he walked.
A million years ago someone, I don’t know who, self-published a book called “Bond Daddy.” I received a copy of it from a Justice Department Lawyer who got it from the then Arkansas securities sommissioner (at the time most of the Bond Daddies were in Little Rock). The book, written as a humorous guide to an aspiring Bond Daddy, had as one of the key precepts that “a banker is a dummy.” I’ve never forgotten those words - “a banker is a dummy.” How true.
I could supply substantive evidence for that assertion, but I somehow think everyone can supply their own.
I’ve called on a few REOs in Arlington and can’t even get a price from the realtor. I don’t think banks in Texas really want to sell their foreclosures. That is no doubt helping to prop up prices. How long can the banks go before having to start really liquidating their properties??
I’ve seen some bundled auctions with amazing prices.
Hmmmm… OFHEO:
rank, quarter, 1 yr, 5 yrs
Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX 63 0.98 3.76 16.54
Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 103 -0.22 2.59 16.39
I’m so encouraged by this wonderful news, that I’m going to upgrade from rice to some kind of ground beef tonight
Seeing that my mother’s burg in the Pacific NW appreciated 67% over 5 yrs, compared to our 16%, I guess her reverse-mortgage loaner wasn’t as dumb as I had thought.
Wait a minute! Last month they told us that rice was the expensive stuff, go hoard your 50 lb. bags at Costco! Did I miss the latest memo?
Hey what is the status of rice at Costco? Is there still a limit on bags of rice, or has everyone stocked up in a 2 years supply already?
I would suspect prices are soon to crash from lack of demand.
They increased downwards, you know… Kinda like hitting the flat part of the downward drop, or something.
Weren’t the sales supposed to pick up after SuperBowl?
Which SuperBowl?
2012
I have a 3/2 superbowls,just cleaned.hehe
“House prices are going to keep deteriorating for some time, analysts say. ‘The outlook has probably darkened a little bit in the last quarter,’ says Celia Chen, the director of housing economics at Moody’s Economy.com.”
Darkened a little bit. Reminds me of when you’re a teen and you’ve dented the family car. You don’t just fess up all at once. More like, “Ummm, there’s a little problem with the car…”
9 Airlines Face Threat of a Credit Downgrade
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/23/business/23air.html?ref=business
The price of jet fuel has risen 82.5 percent in the last year and 10 percent in the last month, making it the single biggest expense for the airlines. If the price does not moderate, Mr. Baggaley said one or more of the major airlines might need to seek bankruptcy protection by 2009.
Passengers and airlines are flying the less-than-friendly skies.
Get in line for your gov’t bailout.
You’re behind the financial industry, but in front of the auto industry. The oil companies get to cut the line whenever they want.
Two bailouts in one decade? Given latent geopolitical tensions that could erupt at any time - the airlines certainly are in a precarious position. This episode might just finish off the legacy carriers.
There’s no U.S. passenger airline of any significance that’s not on this list. It even includes the consistently profitable Southwest.
“However, Mr. Baggaley said the airlines risk alienating passengers more by the fees than if they simply raised ticket prices.”
Making flying more complicated as well as more expensive rather than just more expensive, isn’t a plus. Most, except for Southwest, have added a whole array of extra fees (checked baggage, fuel surcharges, etc.) that will make flying more complicated and confusing, not just more expensive.
Fewer and more expensive flights seems to be the likely outcome. What’s much less clear is just how we get there.
I fly at least two round-trips/month. I’d much rather they raise the prices than, say, charging $15 per checked bag. Why? Because I don’t what there to be excessive carry-on taking up all the overhead space!
However, I’m not sure they’re aiming their pricing games at me.
Nor do I want long lines at the baggage check counter while the hayseeds try to wrangle up $45 to pay for their luggage to get to Disneyhell. Besides the delays from angry people arguing when they were unaware of the charge. What a mess this will be.
“I’d much rather they raise the prices than, say, charging $15 per checked bag.”
I agree completely. Time-wise, charging for baggage is a total loser. You wait longer at check-in for those paying to check bags. You wait longer at security for the additional carry-on bags to be screened. Then you wait longer to board and exit a flight due to all of the extra carry-on baggage.
If weight is the real issue (more weight, more jet fuel consumption) and not the handling of the baggage, why not have each passenger step on a scale at check-in with all baggage (checked and carry-on) and apply a surcharge only if exceeding a specified weight? I’m not expecting any airline to do this for fear of offending their larger passengers, but if trying to more closely tie fares to costs, you have to look at the weight issue (passenger plus bags).
After enduring a VA-CA flight seated next to some gargantuan (and I hesitate to use the term, ) individual whose roll-after-suffocating-roll of flesh spilled not only over the seat arms and onto my cushion, but two-thirds of the way into my seat as well, (I don’t even let my LOVERS get that close,) I have foresworn commercial air travel for the remainder of my earthly days. Five hours (plus another on the tarmac with no air-con,) literally squashed with my face, arm, boobs, hip and thigh into the window and chair arm at a 45 degree angle, has scarred this claustrophobic for life.
(It was my kid’s graduation, I had to do it. Had a perfect stranger in any other scenario done the same thing to me for five hours they would be looking at 5-20 without parole, I promise you.)
As I contorted there, pinned for the eternity that was my confinement, trying with all my will not to scream and keep on screaming until they either turned the plain around and let me off, or performed an emergency liposuction on this Joe846 pack, it occurred to me that airlines should charge not only for checked baggage, but for butt-space. For example:
My clothed butt takes up 13″ of seat space. Some form of bench seating (like is used in say, pick-up trucks or rear seats in SUV’s,) with parallel tracking for an easily reconfigurable restraint system, would have allowed this grossly obese fatass to have his 48″ and still allowed me to breath.
Perhaps FAA should consider mandating at least eight inches on either butt side for “personal space.” Some clever person could make a fortune by designing a seat system for retrofitting existing aircraft– and the flying public would hail them as hero!
A woman in England successfully sued BA for not providing an alternative seat in this situation. Personally i’d refuse to be seated if this happened to me - it’s long overdue that they did something about this.
My goodness, ahansen, you’re pretty eloquent there, arencha? This essay was Homerian in scope, really, and terribly exciting in its epic sweep and stylistic breadth! Impressive.
Did you actually measure your bum? Clothed vs. natural state? I’m going to go do that, soons’ I find a ruler and no one’s looking.
I learned my stylistic nuance from that HBB literary master, Olympiagal.
And yes, in the name of scientific inquiry I did. With a ruler and a MagicMarker.
At home. In my spare time.
I had a similar thing happen to me on a short sna-sea flight last year. I had the Aisle and a 50 year old fatso was in the middle seat. When I arrived at my seat, the armrest is all the way up and he tells me “we will just leave this up ok” I told him no sir, we are not going to leave it up. He complained that he would be uncomfortable, and I replied “what does that have to do with ME?” He got the message and squashed the armrest down. He still bulged over into my seat, but it was fun to hear him grumble.
Comment by ahansen
2008-05-23 10:22:58
‘I learned my stylistic nuance from that HBB literary master, Olympiagal.
And yes, in the name of scientific inquiry I did. With a ruler and a MagicMarker.
At home. In my spare time.’
Well, you clearly just think you’re bettern me, simply because you can find your bum and a ruler all at the same time. And also a MagicMarker.
I’m here to tell you that I can do that too, sometime! Any minute now, even.
I works best when it’s raining out. And you’re really, really bored.
Oh dear god, more carry on bags and other shizzle to deal with once airlines start charging for checked bags.
I have to fly every month now for my job and I hate it. One flight from Auckland, NZ to LAX I was sandwiched between two hefties and spent the whole night with their elbows in my side. Some of these people need two seats.
You actually check bags when you fly? I was on the LAX to MIA redeye last night (currently in MIA terminal waiting for my flight to Cartagena to attend the wedding of a very good friend). The couple behind me were talking about how they had 6 bags between them for a 7 day trip to Aruba. I almost choked on my gin and tonic. Everything I had with me for a 3 day trip fit in a backpack that fit right underneath the seat in front of me (and that included wedding attire and my laptop). If I were less concerned about minimizing my target cross section by presenting the least affluent outer appearance possible for this trip, I’d have my standard equipment of a carry-on roller suitcase and a laptop bag. Can’t remember the last time I checked something. Flying is annoying enough without adding an extra 30-45 minutes to the trip to check and retrieve a bag (assuming the bag actually sticks to its intended itinerary).
It’s amazing how much stuff people bring. I can fit a weeks worth of stuff in my North Face backpack. Have a good time down in the land of heat and sun.
I have witnessed people throwing clothes away to avoid paying the $50 overweight bag fee.
“You actually check bags when you fly?”
With the long list of items TSA won’t allow in carry-on, you’re almost forced to check a bag even if you could get by with a single carry-on bag. Maybe the next administration will finally roll back some of the more egregious and totally unnecessary TSA “security” measures.
“Have a good time down in the land of heat and sun.”
Thanks. Never been to S. America before, so I’m looking forward to it, even though my mom and about a dozen people at work expressed varying degrees of “be careful or you might get kidnapped/killed/robbed/etc.” From what i hear, Cartegena is beautiful and mostly safe.
“With the long list of items TSA won’t allow in carry-on, you’re almost forced to check a bag even if you could get by with a single carry-on bag.”
I can usually make do without most of the stuff they restrict, and if I can’t I just buy it at my destination. The level of crap they give me when I try to get my samurai sword through security it admittedly a little annoying though…
I’m an elite level flyer on American and travel at least 2x a month. I’m frustrated with the nickel and diming to death but what really gets my skivvy is the ticketing change fees. I would happily pay $50 extra per ticket not to have a change fee, but I’m generally not willing to pay the $700-800 premium for unrestricted tickets. I’m so frustrated with this that I’m considering shifting all my flying to Southwest. I flew them last year and had to change my flight and when I called a real person answered and did it right there without a problem. Sitting in first class is nice but is it worth the extra hassles?
“Sitting in first class is nice but is it worth the extra hassles?”
Yes.
When offered a $150 upgrade to first class I take it. I make a meager five figure income, but I can’t take the suffering anymore in cattle class and I’m more than willing to shell out for an upgrade.
They should just add yet another random $15 surcharge to each ticket. Or just up the fuel surcharge. We’re all aware of oil prices on the rise.
Seriously, another fee added to each ticket wouldn’t hurt anyone financially (not even those who fly on the cheap). But charging for bags at check in will create such a gawd-awful mess in the airports. Who comes up with these genius ideas?
Who comes up with these genius ideas?
Ceo/mgmnt .
Mid mgmnt. Brownnosers. Ppl getting the bonuses while laying off others.
They can’t put the cheap airfare genie back into the bottle, the masses simply cannot afford it. It will require a complete rethinking of global tourism and imagine the worldwide fallout of that!
All the same, as some posted the other day, the “golden age” of air travel is sorely missed. Having grown up watching “Airport” - my bias towards smaller planes, bigger seats, younger stewardesses, tastier meals, and complimentary booze is strong.
Fewer people flying will just put another dent in the tourism industry, and those towns dependent on tourism will get cheaper and cheaper to buy in, as housing collapses.
It’s a big weekend here in SE Utarrr for tourists. I’m gonna go hang out at the local park (complete with an Athena missile) and count the cars. It’s COLD and with the price of gas, I bet I get bored pretty fast. I’ll go watch the river instead, supposed to have flood stage all over W. Colo. and maybe E. Utarrr.
Lost,
I’ve got a cool metal Athena model sitting on the table near my computer. My Dad headed some of the Athena project(s) in Green River in the late 60’s. I visited the site (White Sands Missle Range) a few times as a kid.
What I remember most is the “tee box and green with desert in-between” (as it was called) that some of the guys put in on their off hours. They got a deal on a used green “mower” and within about 6 months they had the nicest looking “patch of green” you could imagine.
It was surreal to see this “oddity” out in the middle of nothing but miles and miles of scrub desert and some typical drab Government buildings. I found it much more interesting at the time than the missles and launchers that, as a child of a military contract nomad, had become something of a common sight to me.
Hey, that’s awesome, I’ve been trying to locate some of those guys, is he still around? If you want, email me on my website address (click on my handle). Also, if you go to my website and select Gallery, I have a slideshow of the old missile site, also of Green River showing the Athena. Fun.
PS It’s under the Utah section.
PPS Send me that model, I NEED it!!!! Bad!!!!
Capitol Reef dreaming.. tommy Emmanuel sound. COOL.
Thanks! Awesome place.
Of course, you guys are missing the obvious. By adding a fee and not increasing the ticket price, inflation is kept in check.
Remember, inflation is only 2%.
Bingo.
Merrill setting up a bagholder group to get rid of toxic securities.
http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.aspx?feed=OBR&date=20080523&id=8684719
Audit of $8B in contractor payments finds nearly every transaction lacked proper paper trail
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080523/us_iraq_contractors.htmldocumentation
n one example, $11 million was paid to a U.S. company without any record of what goods or services were provided, the IG wrote.
Sounds like government took its documentation requirements from the mortgage industry. Documentation? We don’t need ne stinking documentation…
Yahoo, yanked this article.
bizarroworld, do you have another source?
You can try these links lostcontrol:
http://www.startribune.com/nation/19197584.html
http://www.pr-inside.com/audit-of-8b-in-contractor-payments-r604851.htm
LOL - “expired” - MSM Net articles don’t expire - that’s why they have unique URLs. They are pulled. Expired, my a–.
Nope - mea culpa, my error - if you delete the word “documentation” from the end of the Yahoo link, the article is there.
Home price index posts largest drop in history
By ALAN ZIBEL – 2 hours ago
WASHINGTON (AP) — A home-price index considered to be the most comprehensive reading of the U.S. market posted the sharpest decline in its 17-year history, and analysts say housing has yet to bottom out.
Rapidly falling home prices in California, Florida and Nevada skewed the national results.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hL1BztOWFNmmcLQ6aOP-BAz9FlMgD9
Lets try this source again!
http://tinyurl.com/5bja65
This morning’s Dow Jones Money Report (radio) mentioned that great rooms had fallen out of favor with consumers, because they “take up too much space”. I’m wondering if McMansions will lose more value relative to normal 3 or 4 bedroom houses as real estate prices continue to slide.
“great rooms” lack coziness, but are a challenge to heat and cool efficiently.
Yes I had the sense that the climate control cost was the real issue.
Especially down here in S Alabama where the summer temps get up to 112 humid degrees…
Buh-bye open floor plans?
Hey, Colorado, I’ve wondered if house styles make a difference in tornadoes. IOW, would an open floorplan create a bigger pressure differential during a twister? Would your big McMansion be more likely to eat it than your smaller lower-to-the-ground 60s type house with more walls?
Never been a huge fan of the great room. I don’t want my bedroom to open on the living room as so many FL houses do. Who ever thought that was a great idea?
Phillygal - I don’t understand this one, though it might be a regional difference. Here in Florida, contemporary house generally come in only two styles: with a separate living room (often referred to as “the museum”) and family room; and with a great room that combines the two, though not always in total square footage. For houses with a view, IMO, the great room has the advantage, because the view in a two-room setup almost always is inferior relative to the space. Of course, “view” in most of (flat) Florida is one-dimensional.
That would lead me to guess that the issue in the North is heat, rather than a/c, since presumably a living room can be completely closed off from the heat that we rarely need down here.
the great rooms I’ve seen in my area usually are configured to have some interplay with the kitchen.
They typically include a fireplace and vaulted ceiling. Those high ceilings do rack up the heating bill.
Fortunately, vaulted ceilings have been out of fashion around here for quite a while. I wouldn’t want one (nor a fireplace) for the reason you note. Assuming R-30 on top, I like 9′ ceilings, 10′ would be tolerable - with good-quality fans. What I see more and more in new houses here is 10′ in the “common” areas and MBR, and 8′ elsewhere in the house. That, and zoned a/c or split units.
Ok–I’m late to post–vaulted ceilings are not a heating/cooling problem in homes that are properly constructed. But more than 99% of homes are not built correctly. To ensure low heating/cooling, you should build to the energy star spec… and have it inspected and pressure tested…
A home-price index considered to be the most comprehensive reading of the U.S. market posted the sharpest decline in its 17-year history, and analysts say housing has yet to bottom out.
Rapidly falling home prices in California, Florida and Nevada skewed the national results.
The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight said Thursday that home prices fell 3.1 percent in the first quarter compared with last year.
Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn’t the OFHEO index only include homes below the conforming loan limit (till recently capped at $417K)? How could an index that excluded almost all Californian SFRs at 2005 prices be accurately characterized as “comprehensive”?
Right, PB. I believe OFHEO numbers also include appraisals for refinancings in their numbers. And we all know how accurate those are.
I’ve ignored those numbers for years.
For some reason, the Fed seems to favor the OFHEO numbers over the ones that show really big housing price deflation…
And yet CNN is reporting today that house prices (they must mean median prices) have risen slightly!
Every month upbeat figures are released by this or that organization or agency, causing Wall Street rallies, then then next month “revised” downward, causing stock prices to fall. It’s so regular and predictable, it has to be deliberate. Why the Press bothers reporting anything positive NAR or homebuilders say is beyond me, since it ALWAYS proves wrong.
Even the sales figures are baloney, since they reflect banks and mortgage companies buying back their own foreclosed or abandoned properties, often at their fake original valuations, or even higher (thus boosting that tricky median price number). When Fannie and Freddy can declare losses as temporary, and avoid factually writing them down, nothing related to real estate appears to be believable, except that it isn’t worth a fraction of what we’re told.
by David Merkel
“…But what of crude oil? There are a number of noises over short covering in the press. The futures curve looks like a bowl, with the far distant futures higher than spot. Crude oil has had a vicious move upward over the last three months. That doesn’t bother me because vicious moves are common in markets where supply and demand are inelastic in the short run.
But there are speculators. Not your common run-of-the-mill speculators, but ones that dress in fancy suits, and have fancy asset allocation equations. Pension funds, and other long term investors are buying commodities and hoarding them, because they think the commodities will be more valuable in the future. But, they are not borrowing to do it, are they. Er, no, not exactly, but yes, in practice. Every pension plan is borrowing implicitly at the discount rate specified by their actuary. If you don’t earn that rate, you fall behind. For now, ignore the correlation arguments that are meaningless because correlations aren’t stable, and think in absolute terms. Every investment that my pension plan invests in should aim to beat the actuarial funding rate.
Will crude oil appreciate at an 8% rate for the next 10 years? Maybe. Can the pension fund emotionally survive a 40% drawdown? Probably not; most pension trustees are scaredy-cats. They will sell oil during the panic. The consultants, with new statistics, will help them do it.
Now, in the present environment, I think that oil has some bubble in it, but it is not the majority of the recent move. As in the late 70s and early 80s, conservation moves slowly, but it does grind prices down. What is different here is that there are many countries willing to take up the slack near current prices, thank you….
Before I leave for the evening, two last comments from the past on bubbles from me:
Rapid money supply growth with no consumer price inflation can only really occur within the confines of an asset price bubble, or else, where does the money go? Interest rates are low at such a time because of the incredible liquidity, and complacency of lenders that they will get an equal amount of purchasing power back. Perhaps another possibility is when a country’s currency is being used more and more as a shadow currency, like the US in the Third World. But even that will come home someday.”
Aleph
No opinion on Mr. Merkel, but I am doing some graphing work on oil priced in Euros vs all the other BS bubbles priced in Euros and correlating to the graphs presented by Tx the other day. Oil looks like a bubble in dollars, not in Euros or Yen.
Merkel is a smart guy. I used to read his stuff on Realmoney. This whole pension speculating first on mortgage securities, now hoarding commodities . . . . something should be done about this.
is that an argument for central control ? That doesn’t sound very Republican.
No. Just commenting on the investment practices of what should be conservative money.
The USD is a collapsing bubble as reflected in oil.
short squeeze:
Surging energy prices are wreaking havoc on producers and speculators who made bets on lower oil prices, forcing some to buy oil to exit their positions. That, in turn, is helping push up oil prices.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121144793027713801.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news
Indeed. I wouldn’t be surprised that if margin requirements were raised on oil, it goes higher, because most of the margin is being used on the short side. Perhaps that’s why it hasn’t been done yet.
I understand that at $128 oil, only $8 cash needed to be put up by the invest/speculator, the rest was on margin?
Inane logic from the WSJ, there are other speculators picking tops. 75 -80% of the oil market is hedgers. There are profit takers all the way up on the speculation side. Just as there will be profit takers all the way down if it breaks. Very few traders are disciplined well enough to ride a break down, doubling up on every point in their favor. Most take profits. Speculators have little say in price and direction since it is impossible to trade in concert from such small positions. Without speculators, the market would be substantially higher. (See: CBOT grain trading history)
He who picks tops ends up scalped. Have a great weekend all.
Ha
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aElyzzHkNwCY&refer=home
A president that is bad for billionaires may not be bad for the rest of us. Bush has been GREAT for billionaires, but not so great for us low class people.
and how many years do you have until retirement?
Same number of years I have before death.
The reaper is the great equalizer.
“whose election would bring … a loss of international confidence in the dollar”
Am I missing something, or has not this trend been underway for many years now?
They are ramping up the blame machine, so that they can try to pin the Republican-formulated problems (that have been building since Reagan) on the next administration. This is just the beginning. Explaining the real causes would be too long and complicated for Fox News viewers to digest, so look for a neat and tidy “It’s Obama/Hillary’s fault” to be the meme for the next 8 years or so.
Watch out for Senator Webb-This will be the candidate in the election cycle that the Regan Demo’s will flock to and his natural base for the Dem presidency.
Protectionism and not Globalism will be the issue in 2012!
imho
Carl Icahn has made his fortunes with junk bond funded stock plays that have dumped many thousands of people into the hands of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. The man is a closet Socialist and doesn’t even realise it. The last time we had a Democrat in the White House he even went so far as to kill off Federal Welfare in part to balance the budget, so his politics are not based on anything real other than fear.
Mayhap you housing bears would be interested in this (credit to redstate)
Posted at 9:42am on May 23, 2008
Barack Obama goes with Dizzy City Fatcat for VP selection job.
Because he’s all about *change.* That you can *believe* in.
By Moe Lane
You’ve probably read Soren’s first piece (starring Jim Johnson) about the lobbyists and bundlers that are lurking around Senator Barack Obama’s campaign. Some of you might have even been bitterly going, “So what? The Obama knows what he’s doing: he might let people like Jim Johnson give him money, but the Obama certainly doesn’t trust them.”
Yeah. About that:
Obama has asked former Fannie Mae CEO Jim Johnson to begin vetting potential vice presidential picks, Democratic officials said Thursday. Johnson did the same job for Democratic nominees John Kerry in 2004 and Walter Mondale in 1984.
[Via Mickey Kaus, who has been watching this guy with horror for years (H/T: Glenn Reynolds). See also Dan's take on the political acumen of Johnson in the first place.]
But, hey! Jim did such a great job for Mondale, Kerry, and Fannie Mae: why not let him work his peculiar magic for the Obama campaign? I mean, clearly if Johnson’s good enough for Obama, he should be more than good enough for all the little people that are faithfully supporting the Senator. Even if Johnson was involved in shenanigans that are now making us contemplate doing a $300 billion dollar bailout of the home mortgage industry.
Great choice there, Barry. Who’s going to be your pick for helping the DNC with their fund raising, by the way? I hear Jeffrey Skilling’s not doing anything these days: of course, he can’t really travel…
Moe Lane
Quick PS: Reread Obama’s supposed denial. Note that it does not say “Jim Johnson will not be the person to lead my VP selection process.” It merely says that Obama’s not paying him. It is, in fact, a rather ornate weasel of a statement.
But I suppose that people will cling to what they cling to.
I am praying for a divided govt. The Dems will control the House and the Senate. I want the opposing party in the presidency. Maybe there will be some sanity, if opposing parties.
Since I am a cynic, I am afraid that it will be irreverent.
imho
ps: I intend to file a protest vote, like I did with John Anderson.
Here’s cynical: it wouldn’t make any difference.
This is what Carl Icahn says, “Billionaire investor Carl Icahn said Barack Obama would be a “terrible” U.S. president whose election would bring higher interest rates and a loss of international confidence in the dollar.
“I don’t normally get involved in politics, but this time I am,” Icahn told an investors conference in New York last night. “I don’t think Obama really understands economics.” ”
And George Bush does?
“I personally think he would be a terrible president,” Icahn, 72, said. Obama would probably go on a “huge spending spree” that “the country can’t afford right now.”
And what exactly did George Bush do? Did he tighten the purse strings?
Coupled with the higher tax rates that the Illinois senator has already endorsed, “you would have a loss of confidence in the dollar,” leading to accelerating inflation and “much higher interest rates,” Icahn said. His comments, and remarks by other presenters at the conference, were embargoed by the organizers until this morning.
I think we already have lost confidence in the Dollar thanks to Bush, Bernanke, Congress with their bailouts, and Hank Paulson. I’m not a Barack supporter but I am not a Bush lover either. Bush has clearly been good for Icahn but bad for the majority of the Country.
GB isn’t running.
What do you call 4 more years of McPain??
a very tired line of commie lib bs which will not fool anyone other than your loonytoons base
Same old flawed policies, same old flawed rhetoric. When one can’t refute the assertions, they always lean on the same old boogeymen….
Good job.
McCain mentions not letting Bush’s tax cuts expire, but he’s not really behind it.
a very tired line of commie lib bs which will not fool anyone other than your loonytoons base
cue lots of air time devoted to ads of John McCain morphing into GWB…footage of McCain yukking it up with GW, there you don’t have to guess. I’ve outlined the upcoming dem campaign.
Creative!
(all rendered in grainy black and white of course. ooh…scary)
Obama’s baseball cap morphing into a turban…..
“I personally think he would be a terrible president,” Icahn, 72, said. Obama would probably go on a “huge spending spree” that “the country can’t afford right now.
Translation - Obama would probably go on a “huge spending spree” that I would not be able to get any piece of.
That may in fact be the case.
So does that mean that the Sage of Omaha believe he will partake of the goody bag?
That’s all right and a moderate. O is a sacrificial lamb! One term president like Jimmy Carter.
imho
Correction
That’s all right, i am a moderate democrat.
Sorry
The money’s been spent already (social security, medicare, etc.).
We can either have tax and spend (Dems), or don’t tax and spend (recent admin). Where the hell are the fiscal conservatives out there? I’m not convinced that McCain is one.
As a debt hater, I’m afraid I lean toward tax and spend instead of don’t tax and spend.
Now if there were only a don’t tax and don’t spend candidate out there…
Carl Ichan who raided and gutted TWA and left its unions for the taxpayers to bail out? Carl Ichan who has made several billions by finagling questionable tax legislation through questionable political maneuvering? That Carl Ichan?
THAT Carl Ichan thinks Obama would be “a terrible president?!”
Goody. Guess who has MY vote?
I think I could have guessed YOUR VOTE before the Icahn comments.
You mean really fat people all vote Republican?
Does anyone really believe Ichan? Hes a big time roller who does well undeer republicans. He’s afraid, that the Dems, will cut him off at the knees.
A billionaire gets says Obama would make a terrible President ?
Sheesh.. a garden SLUG would make a better President than Cheney’s insane MBA religous dry-drunk fratboy placeholder that we have now
‘Sheesh.. a garden SLUG would make a better President than Cheney’s insane MBA religous dry-drunk fratboy placeholder that we have now’
That was, that was…gosh, that was like poetry there, mikey.
Makes you want to cry doesn’t it Oly. Almost sounded like a lost twin of yours
Moody’s Chooses Incompetence
http://www.minyanville.com/articles/MCO-Moody-s-GE-General-Electric/index/a/17274
There is nothing in the dark that isn’t there when the lights are on.
Rod Serling
Love Rod Serling.
It is difficult to produce a television documentary that is both incisive and probing when every twelve minutes one is interrupted by twelve dancing rabbits singing about toilet paper.
‘There is nothing in the dark that isn’t there when the lights are on.’
Rod Serling
Maybe his eyes are just squeezed tightly shut and therefore he can’t see the grimacing axe-waving mummies that crawled out from under the bed as soon as it was dark. Is what I suspect is happening here.
In the comments:
Great Depression survivors counsel GenX’ers to learn Canasta and other cheap entertainment skills
Omigod, canasta! My family got in a huge fight over that because one side of the family used different rules. Big brouhaha! I don’t think I ever played again after that.
There was also a shortage of paper to write down card game scores…rubbish and garbage was so slim it was often just buried in the yard. Save yer paper bags!
Carbon market could be worth 2 trillion euros in 2020: study
The global market in CO2 emission rights could be worth two trillion euros (3.14 trillion dollars) by 2020 if the United States joins the scheme, analysis group Point Carbon said on Thursday.
The United States, which has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol that calls for the mechanism, could in 2020 account for 67 percent, or 1.25 trillion euros, of emissions rights if it decided to introduce a US emissions trading system, the Point Carbon study said.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is one of the main greenhouse gases blamed for climate change.
The carbon market is aimed at encouraging industries to invest in clean technology and buy emissions rights from others that have a surplus.
The second-biggest market would be the European Union — so far the only one in existence — and would account for 23 percent of emissions rights, the study showed.
The total transaction volume forecast would be 38 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent for the United States and nine billion tonnes for the EU.
The calculations are based on an assumed carbon price in 2020 of 50 euros per tonne, twice the current price in Europe.
They also assume that a so-called cap-and-trade scheme will have been introduced in the United States by 2020 and that the EU will have introduced a 25 percent reduction target for emissions, including those from aviation.
The calculations0 assume that trading schemes will have become operational in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Japan, Korea, Mexico and Turkey.
A huge, unnecessary market that enriches a few large players while having no effect in the real world? Perfect.
Wouldn’t it make more sense to have a higher gasoline (and/or carbon) tax that would be fully rebated per capita to taxpayers? It would: a) be more economically efficient, b) be neutral in terms of its net effect on disposable income, c) encourage people to make different choices, d) reduce fuel consumption and carbon output (if you buy the global warming theology), and e) avoid enriching a few connected manipulators. It would also have the benefit of being an honest way to let people see the real costs of such policies.
I’ve been wondering a lot about a carbon tax myself, there’s a lot of good reasons for it as you mention. Thing is, we already have a de facto carbon tax in that we’ve placed so many areas off-limits to exploration. In our current situation, no tax is collected, but in the end it will have the same effect of raising prices and curtailing demand.
A real carbon tax would be more efficient in allocation of resources, but in it’s purest sense, the decisions as to which areas are impacted by exploration and which aren’t is an economic decision. The way we do it now is a political decision. I’m really not sure which is better, probably a mix of the two would be best. I support the notion of placing limits on how fast we burn through the reserves that remain, therby acknowledging that prices for energy are likely to rise significantly.
My guess is that we’ll stay with our current course, seeing that there is not a single presidential candidate, nor a single senator or representative in leadership in either party that is showing even a microgram of insight on energy policy. It literally is 100% pandering across the board right now, no exceptions.
I agree, good post.
Apologies if this has been posted elsewhere.
I had one leg out the door but this was worth turning my computer back on.
Today’s Boston Globe business section reports … “SPAM sales help boost Hormel profit”
This is why I am strictly an amateur investor. How could I not have been long SPAM?
go long Best Foods and Kraft mayonaisse. short Hormel. then go long Morton’s salt and lard, for when people will be eating those dirt cakes like they do in Haiti.
Yes get in on the New Hellmans!!…Now only 30 ounces at the same great price as the old 32 ounce jar…..no inflation here.
Has anyone noticed the price of spam? have they made the can smaller?
Yeah but it has a “great new taste”!
Anyone else out there like spam, eggs, and rice for breakfast? Being Hawaiian born, I love it, even McD’s there has it on the menu, but I guess it’s an acquired taste since my Son turns his nose up at it.
My mom used to make a spam, rice, and peas casserole when I was little (money was very tight back then). I actully loved it. In fact, was feeling nostalgic not too long ago and asked her to make it for me!
My dogs LOVE spam, but I won’t let them eat it.
Cue up the Monty Python…the vikings singing spam..spam..spam..everytime the waitress reads the menu (everything with spam) - a classic.
I read somewhere that according to cannibals Spam tastes the most like humans compared to any other meat.
This is the sort of trashy literature I enjoy. That and stormwater regulation manuals–good stuff!
You should talk to Lad, he just went to New Guinea (he thinks he was in New Zealand, but some of his posts suggested otherwise). That’s where the major headhunters were, if I remember my anthro classes right.
Spam musubi. Mmmmmmm.
Everything is in a smaller package now but with same old higher price..
Sort of like the date I had the other day..lol just kidding.
This is partly an illusion. Hormel recently saw SPAM sales falling and responded with several new varieties and a marketing campaign. There is every reason to believe that the larger trend has SPAM sales continuing to fall over time, but introducing a bunch of new differentiated products with a burst of marketing does tend to help even in a downturn. To get the real story on this look at the long term trend and news reports of product releases and advertising campaigns. I’m partial to the SPAM “Lite”, myself.
My wife brought some WW2 vintage homemaker magazines (Better Homes & Gardens?) from the library. There were several brands of “luncheon meat” back then that where advertised. I’m guessing that at times that was the only “meat” available, judging by all the recipes in the magazine. Also ads from manufacturers apologizing for the lack of goods available to purchase: cars, appliances, etc., but reminding folks that once the war was over it would be different.
Austin has had a Spamarama since 1978, with recipe contests. I don’t know if you can still get “Spamarama - the cookbook” by John Booher.
IIRC, John (aka the Wizard of Austin) battled them for years about the name, eventually Hormel got rights to the title, and now Spamarama is a Hormel sponsored and managed event.
http://www.spamarama.org/history.html
http://www.spamarama.com/
Well, Its beats popcorn for natural value!
However, I would not want this my sole food source.
Somewhere in the food groups, cheap whiskey has to fit in somewhere!
lol
http://tinyurl.com/65q2xh
isbn# 0-9662073-0-0
For all your SPAM culinary needs. The ultimate compendium.
includes:
Spambrosia,
Spamalama Ding Dongs*
Holiday Mincemeat Surprise Cheesecake (!)
*nauseating-yet-imaginative use of SPAM, chocolate sauce, CoolWhip.
I never managed to go to Spamarama - I’m not much for crowds anyway, but I couldn’t get past the nauseating aspect.
If Spam nauseates you, Scrapple would kill ya’
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrapple
That would be tough. I have eaten haggis several times over the years, while listening to recitations of Robert Burns poetry. Of course, the single malt made it all go down easy.
Its got to be better than eating grass!
Apologies for you vegs out there.
Layoff day at JP Morgan.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/24786954
Well who is going to buy those $1100 a sqft kondoze in Long Island City? yes $1100 sq ft.da vuez da veuz:
http://www.liqcity.com/new-development/eastcoast-3-debuts-as-the-view-rockrose-broker-fees-paid-to-tenants.php
——————————————————————
A spokeswoman for JP Morgan confirmed the cuts and said many of the (200) people leaving were junior bankers.
Gee, I’m looking at a little more than $1100/square house in Houston rentals. No wonder the coasts don’t understand middle America.
Investors like 26 year old Robert Milligan of Sarasota.
http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20080226/REALESTATE/802260490
I wonder what plan B is when all he can get is $900 a month for people with great credit who wont overpay!
—————————————————–
$150,000 or less, and can finance them as rental property for $1,200 to $1,300 per month to cover his expenses.
Did they send out the email:
“We’re closing the office at 3 pm today - Have a great weekend, everyone - see you on Tuesday …. well, not all of you.”
I once worked at a PR firm (Washington office of huge, multinational PR/ad company) where they fired my boss on Dec. 20 - Friday - at about 6 p.m. - I remember it vividly, because I was just headed out of the office to go meet my parents for dinner on their anniversary.
He had a sense he was on the block (they were dismantling our whole division - I was already headed to another job, and had given my notice a week earlier) - but he had just remarked to me a couple days earlier - in the gallows humor that pervaded the operation - that he figured he wouldn’t get canned until the first week of 1997.
Oddly enough, however - it is in retrospect the most fun and challenging place I had ever worked, even with a constant fear of cost-cutting when billings slowed.
December 20? That is harsh.
In a short while I shall be getting on my Rincon for a weekend of riding and camping out (Holiday Inns), going out with my 10 yr old G’daughter, her father and Lars and his son. We’ll put on 250mi, I’ll put on 15lbs. A wonderful thing about the Northern Trails, there are restaurants and gas stations every few miles. Bars every few hundred yds.
As to Lars, I set up a ‘gas account’ for him involving very little moneys and thanks to many from the HBB have had him fully invested in a few small stocks. (I’m eating the commissions, lol). There is nothing worse than going to the Dew Drop Inn and hearing Lars talking about the stock market as if he knows what the F is going on! God save me from my friends, my enemies I can handle. At least I taught Lars how to read company quarterly reports and how to evaluate companies.
It is all your fault Voz!
Hoz….you asked for a source yesterday on the link I posted ref. commodities trading. It was F. William Engdahl from Financial Sense online…
sounds like a hum dinger of a good time.
Im just gonna sit back and work too much. Desk jockies have all the fun.
short end of the yield curve thingy looks a little inverted, but I guess thats the Pale Ale talkin. Lotta folks trying to to shake my feeble hand out of oil, but Elsie is still pumping the black gold, might put a little AMR hedge on it.
Have fun. I took the recon out around the property we are living on earlier this week. Spooked two deer. They popped out of the woods (I was riding a woods line) about 8-10 feet from me, cut away and ran back into the woods. Also I was scouting the blackberries. There are TONS of them all over the place. I figure when they come time to pick, I’ll just have to lay an extension ladder into some of the patches to get into it to pick.
–
Expect an upside surprise on Existing Home Sales. Price declines have lured some people into thinking that foreclosure are great bargains right now.
Jas
I expect a full on parade, superbowl event.
With my favorite headline: “Home Sales Up Despite Lower Prices”
–
They fell 1%. The phenomenon in parts of CA didn’t repeat in most areas, it seems. The West did see an increase even when Pac-NW did poorly.
Jas
I also expect the headlines to narrowly focus on the number of homes selling, and to avoid discussion of the price at which they are selling. Otherwise, prospective buyers might figure out that the comps are sinking, and develop a healthy fear of catching falling knives…
My wife is whipsawing between renting/foreclousure picking/renting/foreclosure picking. It’s making me dizzy.
Worse, I found out she actually enjoys remodeling.
Maybe she can offer your landlord some remodeling services in exchange for a rent reduction?
She’ll probably start slow with a request for a rose patch. Do they even grow in humidland? I guess if orchids can do it…
roses like humidland, but need sun
Hey, would she like to go rafting in Utah??? A few days here working on “my” house, then I’ll take her down the Green. It’s HUGE right now. CarrieAnn and Txchick are coming, too. Ben’s invited if he’ll wear that loincloth.
Hey, maybe we should have an HBB rafting party. AZSlim, I know you weld a wicked hammer, you’re invited, too. The more here, the quicker we could do the house.
weld = wield
though as far as I kow, AZSlim could do welding, too, she’s pretty talented…
kow = knoww
flippin’ keyboard
(this could go on forever)… kowww = know
flippin =
I know how to solder and braze. Welding’s next on my to-learn list. (Spoke with a local instructor a couple of weekends ago.)
And I’ll be up at “your” place with tools.
Great!!! BTW, my 19 year old niece is a certified welder. makes good money.
Hehe. I used to raft in WA state, but my wife has expressed reservations in the past against anything involving being dunked in water less than her tropical heritage 26-29 C (79 - 84 F). As long as the rafting is optional… and she gets to use the spray gun. She was impressed with the painters gear here yesterday. I’m supposed to canvas paint sprayers on the way home.
Hey, maybe we should have an HBB rafting party.
I’m up for that. Lad? Oly?
Catch a tributary out to the upper Kern and I’ll shoot one of these putrid range cows and make us sum serious BBQ.
Mmmmm bar b q! You’re upping the ante there lost!
–
SFH Months of Supply hit a new multi-year high of 10.7, up from 9.6 for March. This means that inventory, also at multi-year high of 3.9M, is rising faster than the seasonal adjustment.
Do you think that at least half of the 3.9M are vacant? 10% a year bleeding in carrying costs in addition to 15% a year price decline. I think that these people carrying vacant homes are going to make the price declines continue around 15% Annual Rate for quite a while.
Jas
An 11+% increase in one month. Seems like a huge increase, to me, though it presumably is to be due to Spring Selling Season. More like inventory that was being held off the market but really woulda’ sold much earlier if only there were a “decent” offer.
High food and energy prices, which have a lower elasticity of demand than luxury housing consumption, coupled with a negative savings rate, have the effect of crowding out the McMansion expenditure share in household budgets.
REVIEW & OUTLOOK
Oil and the Fed
May 23, 2008
So the Federal Reserve is signaling that its rate-cutting binge may finally be over, and we can be grateful for that small favor. The consequences of its easy-money bender will roll through the economy for years to come, however, so it’s important to draw the right lessons.
I have to question the following passage from the WSJ editors. The problem is that it suggests the Fed had a better alternative than the course recently taken. But a tighter monetary policy stance might have cost far more lost jobs in exchange for a less severe drop in the dollar’s value. I personally don’t believe there was any easy way out when BB took over the Fed chairmanship in 2005.
“Politically, meanwhile, the Fed’s commodity spike is proving to be deadly for the Republican Party that occupies the White House. As the nearby poll question shows, rising prices overall and gas prices specifically are by far the public’s biggest economic worries. Voters are understandably furious because they can see that their real incomes are falling as prices rise. This is the real source of middle-class economic anxiety – not the housing recession, or jobs, or the liberal obsession with income inequality.”
Don’t most people vote their pocket book?
is “liberal obsession with income inequality” a “real source of middle-class economic anxiety”? i wonder how.
haven’t you read your Nietzsche?
Great article. Spot on!
The Mogambo Guru is a bit more blunt in his assessment of recent Fed monetary policy than the WSJ editorial board. From the article linked at the top of the bits bucket:
“What did the Fed and the banks steal? The purchasing power of your money, you chump! How do I know this? Hahaha! Look at the raging inflation in the prices of food and energy, you moron! Hahaha! Do you actually think that a dollar seems to buy as much as it used to? Hahaha! Where did the purchasing power go? The Fed stole it!”
What the credit bubble givith… the credit bubble taketh away.
40 years ago we were heading for a significantly lower standard of living as globalization and the post WWII expansion began to fade…
So, we delayed it for 40 years by borrowing ourselves a lifestyle.
Without that credit bubble, many complaining about lost purchasing power of money, would not have money to worry about the purchasing power of.
That is a drastic oversimplification. Throughout recent years representatives of Fed and the Treasury have repeatedly warned the Congress and the President of the risks of overspending. If the Federal budget is an insane mess year after year then blaming the crashing dollar on the Fed because of how they set rates doesn’t really make sense.
Oversimplified, perhaps, but highly entertaining nonetheless!
I have a 1978, 1800sqft, block construction house, 4 total windows, we use evap cooler most of sumer, solar water heater…
Guy was out trying to sell me new windows for $4800. Oh, he says, you’l cutt your elect bill upto $100 a month so the windows will pay for themselves in 4 years….
WHAT???? You’re going to cut my winter/summer elect bill 50% and spring/fall by 66%?
He starts to argue with me that my elect bills have to be over $200. So I pull my bills for last year. $150 for spring and fall, and $200 in winter with August being the most expensive at $225.
Oh, says he, with the elect range I assumed you were on elect for heat and water too. I AM. No natural gas to my house.
He was shocked. Says his util bills are tripple that in his 2005 house.
SO, if he can slice 20% from my elect bills the 4 months I use the heat/AC, $200* .2 * 4 = $160 a year = 30 years to make my money back.
30 year ROI. That sucks! And it’s not even that it would actually pay for itself in 30 years anyway: If you squirreled that money away at 2.4% interest, you’d beat that energy-saving “investment”. Andf that’s assuming his 20% guesstimate is even right!
Most houses in Phoenix have way too many glass windows.
$1,200/window, must be nice windows.
CURRENCIES
Dollar flat to lower as oil renews advance
Cautious trade seen ahead of long holiday weekend
By William L. Watts, MarketWatch
Last update: 7:25 a.m. EDT May 23, 2008
…
Light sweet crude for July delivery was up $1.94, or 1.5%, to $132.75 a barrel in electronic trade. The New York Mercantile Exchange contract notched a record high above $135 early Thursday before pulling back.
Because oil is traded in dollars, any rise in the dollar makes oil more expensive and less appealing to investors holding other currencies. As a result, oil and the dollar often trade inversely.
Well d’oh…
Here is your next bubble….
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=a_TUtlIwV7Fw&refer=home
Hint… alternative energy based on the assumption U.S. will screw itself by joining carbon trading BS.
Sure, solar is a broken concept since the energy can’t be transported or stored and is far too intermittant…. But we’ll wave some magic wand and make those mega issues just go away.
Solar’s utility has always been to companies not households.
After all, every one goes to work during “sunlight” hours so companies have a HUGE incentive to use solar power to lower their bills.
For households, solar is useful but nowhere near as much as for corporations (particular ones in the sunnier climes.)
that is exactly opposite to what I’m hearing in Europe and especially Germany!
The big German power companies are trying to block solar power (subsidies/regulations that favor voltaic panels etc. for the average citizen). Why? Because windmills are most profitable at their biggest scale (in my area 120-150m sized giants are the norm now, putting a small 1-2m windmill on your roof gets you nowhere and probably is not allowed anyway) which is far out of reach for normal consumers. Solar (both photovoltaic and thermal) is currently more profitable on the smaller scale, like for powering ones own home (making the energy storage problem far less important: easier to use the energy when plenty is available).
With just wind energy subsidies the large power companies have total control and are assured of fat profits (they decide the price of energy). If small scale solar gets popular, especially the localized/grid version, they are in deep trouble. I think large scale solar energy is not an attractive option, certainly not in most of Europe. It might get attractive in the far future, when there are better ways to convert sunlight into fuel (e.g. using algae to produce biofuel).
Can you create a starter farm for that in a green swimming pool?
unfortunately it is more complicated; I think the US is experimenting now with algae or cyanobacteria in salt marshes (if that is the correct word?) for biofuel. In my area in the Netherlands there is some talk about developing special algae farming technology using salty ponds just behind the dikes. I think the technology is not there yet, too many problems; they need to work on the input and output side to prevent environmental problems. But it could get interesting in 10-20 years.
Solar was last years’ bubble. King coal is back for 09.
I live one hour from Utah’s big coal mines. Word is they’re worried, coal’s going out of favor and the carbon credits thing will become a problem for them. They had a big todo over it covered by the local paper. But with oil skyrocketing, who knows?
I wish it were otherwise, but the coal folks should have no fears. We solar suppliers are still just peeing in the ocean at this point, and it will remain that way for a while.
Since the last round of US solar tax credits, solar panels prices have gone up, not down. If you subsidize energy production (same as ethanol), you’ll get more, and more expensive, energy production, not reduction of demand which is what we really need. Only higher prices will do that. Plus we’ve got some spot shortages of panels in the US right now, they tell us the weak dollar makes panel sales in Europe and Japan look more attractive.
As petrol prices increase, solar panels will go up as well for the time being, because it takes lots of dino fuel to make and transport solar panels. Eventually we’re going to see the big technological advances in design and production that will bring the price down radically. But they’re not ready for prime time just yet.
We haven’t been able to figure out how to transport the elect from boulder dam into L.A. efficiently. And we’re going to magically figure out how to store and transport elect from solar? I don’t think so.
Have to disagree. Solar is a great peaking power - the sun is usually pretty bright when peak electricity demands hit in the middle of the afternoon. Except if you are off the grid, it is no big deal not to have solar at night. At night power has little value (it is almost free) as the big coal fired and nuclear plants run all night long - it is cheaper to keep them going and generating base load than to shut them down.
Hoover Dam (it has not been Boulder Dam for many years) hydro power is actually your ultimate peaking power - whatever your peak loads, just open the wicket gates a little more or less and you have matched loads. Rates would be much higher in PHX without Hoover and other hydro power.
And about transporting solar and hydro power - it seems to me that solar electrons flow the same way that any other electricty does.
From experience, I agree with Civil re the peak demand points. That’s exactly why all commercial customers have (or should have) a second “demand” meter. As a major cost factor, It forces them to consider when they use power during the day. If demand meters were economical to use for households (they aren’t), I believe it would change consumption habits drastically.
In many developing (formerly known as “Third World”) countries, residential electricity usage is billed at an increasing rate per KwH, for social purposes. While it runs counter to the standard economics of marginal cost of production, it likely has the effect of moderating peak demand at least a bit.
Darrell
With all due respect, the problem with your thinking is you’re assuming alternate energy has to provide a 100% replacement of conventional energy. It doesn’t. It only has to supplement conventional generation methods to be useful.
If these plants can generate 8-cent electricity they are capable of running a lot of air conditioners in Phoenix/Tucson/Las Vegas/LA at the exact time when that energy is needed. Who cares if they don’t light up the Las Vegas strip at night. You can always start-up a conventional generator for that. Meanwhile, a lot of ‘fossil’ fuel has been saved and can be used for other purposes. A BTU is a BTU is a BTU. It’s what we’ve spent at the end of the day/week/month that counts.
I’m not a believer in human caused global warming as a catastrophic problem. I do believe in peak oil — defining peak oil as that point on the supply/demand curve where price increases cause a change in habit or lifestyle. I think we’ve reached that point now. Be glad that some of the pressure of supplying energy for this country is being taken from Saudi oil.
Bingo: alternative, renewable energy sources just help reduce the amount of fuel burned, but that alone is very good. We’ll also need massive conservation efforts, too.
“If these plants can generate 8-cent electricity they are capable of running a lot of air conditioners in Phoenix/Tucson/Las Vegas/LA at the exact time when that energy is needed.”
And, there is the problem. They can’t.
Yeah, it is dumb to use natural gas for electricity. As T Boone said a couple days ago, natural gas is a protable energy and needs redirected to autos.
But coal is still by far the cheapest electricity. As long as we don’t do something dumb, like carbon trading schemes that let Chindia burn all they want while we hand-cuff ourselves, we have enough coal to last 150+ years.
But really, NUKE is the way to go.
It is stupid to be wasting money on wind and solar subsidies when nuke is so cost effective. Don’t get me started on biodeisel or ethanol.
But seriously, why not a biofuel plant in PHX. Cut down trees in our mountains and strip them of the bark, leaves and branches which leaves 99% of the neutriants in place, run them down hill to PHX where the hot/dry climate provides the perfet drying environment. Then burn the wood for fire. Trap the CO2 from the exhaust and it is net negative carbon since the trees grow back.
Or better yet, gasification. Much less energy loss transporting gas in a pileline than electricity in a wire.
DARRELL:
I think all of you are forgetting the main reason why we are even talking about this stuff.
————
After all, every one goes to work during “sunlight” hours so companies have a HUGE incentive to use solar power to lower their bills.
———————-
FPSS has the idea. too many people work during the day. Brown outs and blackouts would never occur even in Kali if millions more had jobs at 4AM instead of 4 PM…..and why would we need peak electric plants sitting idle most of the year????
I have proposed a reverse tax credit, give business a tax credit based on the number of 2nd 3rd weekend holiday shift works you hire with health insurance…If you hire only 1st shift workers,then you pay full price no incentives nothing from the state city or electric companies…..
I think businesses will find many way to make people work other then 9-5 M-F and think of all the benefits….imagine riding the NYC subway at 10-11 am instead of 8…. or the highways I think the benefits will be tremendous if we had more flex scheduling. coupled with tax incentives ..
Heck don’t you ask me for a discount for your Wedding in June, but in January heck 50% off is fine with me!!!!!
NYCdj - good idea. However, I think that increasing the “demand” charge for commercial customers would accomplish the same thing, and would be far simpler to implement. Same cojones, different vise.
Rampant commodities inflation takes its toll on availability of “poor man’s gold”:
Curb on Coin Sales Angers Collectors
Investors, seeking alternatives to stocks and real estate, have created such a demand for 2008 silver dollars that the government has begun rationing them. The shortage offers a glimpse into the growing love of a commodity known as “poor man’s gold,” but it has angered collectors.
The U.S. Mint has been making 1 oz Silver Eagle Dollars for 22 years now, and there’s never once been a shortage, for any reason…
I suspect the mint is having supply problems as far as finding enough Silver, to get the job done.
I buy some of the US gold, silver, and platinum coins because I like them, but the last thing I think of about them is an “investment.”
If you want to invest in PMs you hold yourself, you’d want to find a way of buying it that’s as close to the actual price of the commodity as possible!
I’m shocked there’s a shortage of them! Stupid Americans.
There have been rumblings of a shortage since the spike to 21. The mint used to sit on a mountain of silver but now it is all gone, and they have to buy on the open market. I will keep my silver, and sell my fiatscos.
Could someone please remind me how much the U.S. stock market dropped during the oil shocks of 1973-1974? Was it 50 pct nominal or so, against a backdrop of high inflation (implying an even larger real drop in value)? Not that it will happen again, as it is different this time…
Oil Jump Casts Shadow on Forecasts
The recent surge in oil prices is a terribly timed shock to the system. With the economy under strain, the oil price jump raises new questions about the viability of forecasts for stronger corporate profits during the second half of the year.
‘74 in particular was a brutally bad year
Today’s market action is shaping up to be really ugly. I can faintly hear the thundering herd of Wall Street bulls stampeding over the market’s cliff from all the way out on the left coast…
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=%5EDJI#chart12:symbol=^dji;range=19691006,19800401;compare=^dji;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=off
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=%5EDJI#chart2:symbol=^dji;range=19281001,19771003;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=off
a very good interactive chart. i hope it helps answer you question.
Question for long-time stock market watchers: Is this summer’s market likely to appear through the rear-view mirror like a replay of the summer of 2000 market? I happened to frequent a coffee bar that summer whose TV was trained on CNN Money. I can recall my astonishment at the seemingly-endless summer of larger-than-expected declines on the major U.S. stock market indexes, day in, day out.
You mean 2002, right?
I’ve said here several times this market is looking like summer ‘00 to me too. That would mean August would be a superb time to short.
You might be right — my recollection of the tech stock crash is foggy at best. Was 2002 the summer of day-after-day declines in headline U.S. indexes? I can remember feeling shell shocked by the duration of persistent declines. Folks I knew who were day traders (but not shorts) saw their trading fortunes go up in smoke that summer.
Yes. ‘02. There was a false rally in Nov - Feb of ‘01 after 9/11 which was the real killer. From about May - October of ‘02 there was a series of declines that shocked even me. July of ‘02 was particularly unreal.
“From about May - October of ‘02 there was a series of declines that shocked even me.”
What we’re lacking is a “Global Rouge Event” … but I’m convinced by Sir Greenspent’s argument & belief… that there is simply to much: “Highly Educated” “Financial Innovation” to possibly allow for anything such event to happen…it’s “impossible” & in “conceivable” in our lifetimes…now get back to trading stocks like there’s NO tomorrow.
Is there any fundamental reason the U.S. stock market is getting pounded today, or is this simply a manifestation of the old adage, “Sell in May, go away”? (I would think the burgeoning price of oil and the Fed’s announcement of no more rate cuts would be priced in by now, but the market seems a bit slow on its feet these days…)
From Financial Times:
Pimco’s chief piles into mortgage debt
By Deborah Brewster in New York
Thursday May 22 2008 17:35
Bill Gross, the manager of the world’s biggest bond fund, has switched gears to make a big bet on mortgage debt, almost tripling his holding of it to more than 60 per cent of the fund.
Gosh, and you wonder why Bill Gross wants the government to “do something!”… like back in February when, among others things, he said this in a Q&A with US News & World Report:
So it’s necessary for the government to essentially subsidize mortgages?
Yes, I think so. You need an interest rate below existing interest rates. I think they need to subsidize it. Let’s not get ridiculous, but with a 4.5 or 4 percent interest rate and 0 percent down for people who have demonstrated good credit and a willingness to pay on time. Let’s get it over with and move forward.
Hmmm… money for homeowners, or money for Bill? Just another reason for government to “Just Say No” to any big mortgage bailout.
Brilliant speculative move: Load up on toxic mortgage debt, then pander the gubmint for taxpayer-funded bailouts…
Bill the Pimp understands the saying that if you own the bank $ 10K you have a problem, but if you owe them $10M they have a problem (make that $ 10 trillion in this case).
I’m curious how much subsidy (for Bill and his buddies) he considers fair, given that real rates are already -10% negative or so.
Hopefully the U.S. stock market is decoupled from the Vietnamese stock market…
EMERGING MARKETS REPORT
Where has the Vietnam euphoria gone?
Inflation, trade deficit dent stocks; long-term investors still optimistic
By Polya Lesova, MarketWatch
Last update: 4:37 p.m. EDT May 22, 2008
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — What was once euphoria has turned to gloom.
hey Professor:
Maybe now is the time to announce a major oil find in the Mekong Delta? Nahhh too many Nam vets are still alive……oops why are we in Iraq?
Time to open up ANWR and the left coast to drilling…
Buying SPY, DIA, QQQQ to hedge the puts. Too lazy to sell and try to buy back.
In The WaPo today, Home Sellers Will Try Anything, but It’s Hard to Get a Look. ((print-ready version)
In many cases, sellers are struggling to compete with the record supply of foreclosed homes listed at rock-bottom prices. In Prince William County, for instance, the number of single-family houses listed for sale for less than $200,000 shot up 15,000 percent last month compared with a year earlier — from 5 to 768. There was a 66 percent increase in listings under $500,000.
15,000% more value!
How is this for FISHY:
“After reading a newspaper story about an Ohio couple’s experience with a house raffle, Crawford decided to do the same with help from her agent, Cynthia Moler of Coldwell Banker. They contacted the San Mar Children’s Home in nearby Boonsboro.
“Because only charities can raffle a house in Maryland, the home was sold to San Mar for its appraised value, $380,000. The charity then sold raffle tickets at $100 a pop to cover the cost.
“The effort captured national media attention, which generated enough publicity to help raise the money needed plus an additional $214,000 for the charity.”
How much you wanna bet that the closings were simultaneous? No way a charity is going to pay list price for a house unless it is sure it will raise enough to cover the cost. I’d bet that the charity was selling it’s option on the house, in other words they were acting like a 2005-style pre-construction Florida condo flipper. Either that or someone is incredibly stupid or crooked, IMO.
You couldn’t PAY me to live in PWC. Last time I was employed there I commuted from Alexandria every day. (I took the bus, btw; I wouldn’t drive in that area.) It was totally worth it… living in PWC makes you want to shoot yourself in the head (especially on weekends).
Exisiting home sales slightly better than expected. Slightly.
From a revised “DOWN” forecast. They revise it down prior to the numbers coming out. A few months later, they revise the number down, but who cares since it was all in the past?
The YOY change in sales rate, the change from the 2005 peak and the ever-larger inventory are the meaningful numbers in the NAR report.
‘Resales have sunk 17.5% in the past year and are down 33% from the peak in 2005. The pace of sales has been relatively stable since August at around a 5 million annual pace.
The inventory of unsold homes jumped 10.5% to 4.55 million, an “uncomfortably high” level, said Lawrence Yun, chief economist for the real estate trade group.’
Foreclosures in PHX still skyrocketing. 2750 notice of turstee sales so far thie month. 16 work days down, 5 to go. 171 per day, on pace to break 3600 for 21 work day month.
Compare to last month where we had 3030 or so for 22 work days. 138 a day.
As recently as 3-4 months ago, we were HALF this rate.
BTW, 2008 - 23 = 1985…
BULLETIN
UNSOLD HOUSES ON U.S. MARKET HIT 23-YEAR HIGH: REALTORS
ECONOMIC REPORT
Unsold houses rise to 23-year high in April
Sales decline 1% even as prices plunge 8% year-on-year
By Rex Nutting, MarketWatch
Last update: 10:01 a.m. EDT May 23, 2008
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The U.S. housing market weakened further in April, with a flood of homes coming on the market even as sales and prices declined, the National Association of Realtors reported Friday.
For Jas Jain
http://www.minyanville.com/articles/S-MCO-BSC-consumer-Moody-deflation/index/a/17287
–
Thanks, Chick. Us deflationists have to be a very patient bunch.
Jas
Thanks from me, too, Chick. I’m a quiet deflationist and that article gave me a lot of satisfaction, having had to endure a obnoxious relative’s crowing during the “good times.”
REALTY Q&A
Fork over your financials
Forget about getting a ‘no-doc’ mortgage these days
By Lew Sichelman
Last update: 7:31 p.m. EDT May 22, 2008
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Question: I currently have a “stated income” (no or low-doc loan) loan. I’m going to explore refinancing soon. My credit is good, and I am current on the loans on my two properties. Given the current marketplace do you think I can get another stated income loan if I refinance?
Answer: I doubt it.
But… but… but that would mean this person would have to be able to PAY for their house with REAL money?! We can’t have that!
No problem, just show ‘em your tax return! LOL
Arghhh… in the final Q&A, the writer casually notes that investment bankers are buying up defaulted mortgages for 60 cents on the dollar. Oh, really? You mean, the investment bankers who are getting their money for close to 0% at the Fed window? Is there a single word for “sucks squared”?
EUROPE
Rate hike off the table
Lackluster results from euro-zone purchasing managers’ data likely to hem in the European Central Bank on interest rates.
Sales of existing homes fall 1 percent in April, eighth drop in past 9 months
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080523/economy.html
Even with the weak results for April, Lawrence Yun, chief economist for the Realtors, said he saw reasons for optimism for the second half of this year as more types of mortgages become available as industry and the government respond to a severe credit crunch that began last August.
“I would encourage buyers who were disappointed by poor mortgage options to take another look at the market because the lending changes are significant,” he said.
Yun…… Now it’s not the mortgage options, it’s the inflated prices. The boom crowd went bust and most current buyers won’t be looking at making a flip killing; they want value.
Must be a slow news day at the Washington Post - the astonishing story of a couple who couldn’t generate interest in their over-priced Woodbridge house even with the help of an 8-year old Mustang convertible.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/22/AR2008052203735.html
Mark and Elaine Hendricks recently offered their 2000 Mustang convertible as a freebie to anyone who would buy their Woodbridge house, but even that failed to distinguish it from the roughly 700 other homes for sale in their Zip code.
“We wanted to try something unusual, thinking maybe it might be crazy enough to bring somebody in,” Mark Hendricks said. “But with so many houses on the market, a free car doesn’t do the trick.”
In Prince William County, for instance, the number of single-family houses listed for sale for less than $200,000 shot up 15,000 percent last month compared with a year earlier — from 5 to 768. There was a 66 percent increase in listings under $500,000.
That’s what the Hendricks family was up against when they tried to give away their Mustang. At the time, at least 30 homes were for sale within a mile of their house, they said. One similar to theirs was listed for $199,000. They were asking $375,000.
The car failed to stir buyer interest, and they gave up on the idea after three weeks. Instead, they slashed their price a second time to $339,000.
First Loudoun County, then Prince William County, take the 30% ( or more) price declines. These are outter suburban counties on the Virginia side of Washington, DC. Moving inward, the next county is Fairfax. Does the big price slide hit Fairfax later this year? And if it does, then do Arlington and Alexandria follow? (They are across the Potomac River from DC.)
In the last go-round the big price declines started in the exurbs then gradually moved in to the city and the pricey, close-in suburbs. I believe that this pattern is now repeating in metropolitan areas throughout the USA.
At the risk of “it’s-different-here-ism” - I think the close-in suburbs will do better for two reasons:
1) Less available land for new inventory - yes, there is still opportunity for small in-fill projects, tear-downs, and condos — but most of the land available for large scale SF and TH projects is already in use of some kind. They may be able to find a little more along the hinterlands of Eisenhower Ave. in Alexandria, and along the train tracks south of Crystal City in Alexandria/Arlington — but it’s harder to find raw land or vastly-under-used in the inner burbs. The worst action in the close-in burbs is for condos - where there has been plenty of new construction in the last few years - and many of these are being turned into apartments.
2) Gas/commute costs are going to slow the number of folks who trade a smaller, older close-in house for the larger place in the exurbs as the family grows - trading in the bungalow or townhouse in Arlington for the 5 br, 3.5 baths in Landsdowne so the kids can have a more suburban lifestyle, and less diverse schools. There’s always been a premium for “close-in” - and I think that premium increases in the current climate. Of course, there is a lot of employment in the suburbs, as well - so the proximity to DC is not a “must” for everyone - or even a majority of folks - but it is for a good part of the workforce.
Of course - I’m just talking matter of degree here - I still think Alex/Arlington still have a ways to come down - I’m just not sure it will be as bad as PW/Loudon. And - recent history shows that most cases of “it’s different here” prove to misguided, so I fully accept that my mild case of IDH might be similarly misguided. I look forward to seeing how it plays out, either way.
Woodbridge (and pretty much all of Prince WIlliam County) is a total @#$thole.
AMEN to that!
Even Manassas doesn’t get a pass because it’s chock full of illegals.
MARKETWATCH FIRST TAKE
Bought but can’t hold
Commentary: Put your house on the market now? Are you nuts?
By MarketWatch
Last update: 10:41 a.m. EDT May 23, 2008
CHICAGO (MarketWatch) — Either American home sellers are an incredibly optimistic lot, or they think they are stock traders who need to dump their assets in a declining market. How else to explain the surge in homes going up for sale in April, in the teeth of the worst downturn in housing since the Great Depression?
“How else to explain the surge in homes going up for sale in April,…”
Margin calls
LOL…. I believe you are right on with that one.
How else to explain it? All the people that took their houses off the market 9 months ago, now putting them back on the market in anticipation of the leases running out in a few months.
Congressman Proposes that Government Establish a “Reasonable Profits Board”
The current high price of gas has led to a lot of crazy proposals from gas tax holidays to creating a tax deduction based upon energy consumption. But Rep. Paul Kanjorski’s (D-PA) may top them all in terms of its stupidity. From the Times Leader, Kanjorski’s plan would do the following:
• H.R. 5800 would tax industries’ windfall profits.
• The bill would set up a Reasonable Profits Board to determine when these companies’ profits are in excess, and then tax them on those windfall profits.
• As oil and gas companies’ windfall profits increase, so would the tax rate for those companies.
• Kanjorski said his legislation will encourage oil companies to lower prices to prevent them from receiving higher tax rates.
While Hillary Clinton may have failed ECON 101 along with John McCain, it appears as if Kanjorski may been enrolled in Marxism 450 at the time. In all honesty, nationalization of the oil industry (i.e. Venezuela) may be better than Kanjorski’s ridiculous proposal.
http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/show/23183.html
May 23, 2008 10:48 A.M.ET
BULLETIN
Crude’s gain is stocks’ loss
With Memorial Day at hand, thoughts turning to hurricane season
The only hurricane in sight is the one ravaging Wall Street today…
stopped out of etf hedges in record time. I just love giving money away
The puts are blowing and going though. Targeting 1330 - 1350ish to perhaps roll out of them.
Would today be a good time to buy the dip?
Probably not.
I wondered how long you’d last with those. Little hiccup on the way down during lunch hour, but the slide seems to be back on.
“In a sign that Americans are curbing their driving in the face of high gasoline prices, U.S. data released on Friday showed that highway miles driven in March fell 4.3 percent from a year earlier.”
sorry for this bonehead question, but how do they know this? and where does their data come from?
One article I read today mentioned the information comes from the sensors embedded in highways all over the country that are triggered by passing vehicles. Trends in traffic over these should be easy to follow. The sensors don’t differentiate between commercial & noncommercial traffic, though.
l-t T-bond yield whiplash
My new investment theory is to simply guess which markets the government is going to save. I posted about IXG a while back (financial ETF) and SLM a few days ago. When the Feds saved BS and soon thereafter, IXG had a 10% bump. SLM threatened to get out of the student loan business (gov’t guaranteed) and guess what, the Feds folded. Look at SLM this week, more than 10% up. I am out of both, but now feel that the Gov’t will do anything it can to get oil/gas prices down so I am moving into the DUG ETF mentioned yesterday. I am worried about a run to $150 before it implodes but am no longer playing with my money anymore (I know it is but this is a hobby, not my business). I know this theory is too simplistic, and that what the Gov’t is doing in these situations is likely to have disasterous, long term effects, but in an election year with these bozos in charge, it seems to be working….
“My new investment theory is to simply guess which markets the government is going to save.”
Do you realize that there is an entire subsector of the financial sector which specializes in Fed watching?
Yes, but I was never into the Greenspan briefcase watch. Only kidding. I followed it and the rest of the watchers/experts but I, personally, never invested based upon their thoughts or theories. Guessing on whether a Dem or Rep would win and whether it would be good for health care, Wall St., oil companies or anything else is interesting, as is trying to guess if today is the day we absolutely have to focus on stimulating the dying economy or the next day be vigilant fighting inflation. I am just convinced that the Gov’t agencies and Fed will not let anything “too big to fail” fail, even if we sell out future generations in the process. SLM is a perfect recent example. It is up over 20% bottom to top this week, I am sure the experts saw it coming, but it has been a 5-8% per day gainer without a severe gap up. They threatened to pull out, the Feds caved. It wasn’t rocket science though it was a bit of a gamble if you thought their was a chance the Gov’t would have a back bone and not cave. I think the pressure to reduce gas prices will force them to do the same dumb things (see the Strategic Petro reserve policy they recently revised), though they may not have all the power to control the market they do have some tools. I wish they would support the dollar a bit as it would help all around….. I was just saying I am now using this info a lot more than I used to (versus, say, tech analysis), not that I discovered or pioneered anything here, just that in this economy and with this gov’t, I think it is more valid and helpful way to look at things then in the past.
Story on SLM crying wolf and your Fed. Gov’t ($$$) to the rescue….
http://www.cnbc.com/id/24760352/for/cnbc/
At an Old Hollywood (read: Republican,) party in Bev Hills last weekend I got to talking to a Major Donor who hobby-invests in Sacramento real estate. She said that prices are once again at– or slightly above– asking, and that multiple offers are the norm. She has had several near-asking price offers outbid in the last few weeks as prices inch back up. (Still “discounted” from last year, however.)
Apparently the county, in an attempt to staunch the bleeding, is carrying up to 60% of the now 8% down payment requirement for FHA loans-effectively returning the down payment to 3% of the loan. (So much for stringent new federal underwriting standards.) These loan loans, she said, were written by local banks (surprise,) who are, of course, ultimately underwritten by you and I. So it would appear that in spite of this huge debacle, nothing much has changed except the verbiage.
She also said that most of the buyers she sees are not listing their old house for sale, but renting it out to the huge number of foreclosed “owners,” who now need a rental. The buyers are “upgrading” to the houses said renters lost to foreclosure. She said she is “making a lot of money right now.”
So I guess the question raised is this:
Can this scheme work in the long run? IE, the same money and housing being traded back and forth indefinitely.
well, in my opinion i would say if the former fb’s quit making the house payment to the bank, chances are they wont feel obligated to pay the rent for someone elses mortgage either. alot of bad attitudes out there right now. its one thing to not have and dream about getting, but it is also another thing to have had and then lost it. it dosent look like any of this is going to turn out very well.
Big “POP!” from this bubble in Modesto
Asking Price 05/15/2008 $330,000
Sale History 09/29/2005: $704,272
http://tinyurl.com/5v2pm3
Anyone linked to this article yet?
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/05/23/business/23rate.php
It’s about banks possibly having lied (I’m shocked) about the basis for LIBOR rates. “Libor is currently used to price more than $360 trillion of financial products globally.” Gets my attention, for sure.
Afghanis swap poppies for wheat as food costs soar (10 day-old article, but I just came across it).
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/may/13/afghanistan
If only they could produce some wheat/opium hybrid for the masses…
check out the aroma of this toast, man…
Aladinsane, where are you now–when we really need you….
Heroin addicts give me the willies, they have such a funeral pall look to them, their marble skin tone that of a tombstone.
sorry if this is a repost (article from Reuters):
FEATURE-Lawsuits accelerate amid U.S. housing crisis
Fri May 23, 2008 10:56am EDT
By Nick Carey
CHICAGO, May 23 (Reuters) - The U.S. housing crisis has caused huge loan losses at big lenders but also spawned a slew of class-action lawsuits against them, many alleging noncompliance with consumer disclosure rules.
“The compliance issue is a ticking time bomb for some lenders,” said Louis Pizante, chief executive of Mavent Inc, an Irvine, California-based company that provides automated regulatory compliance reports for financial clients. “We have only just seen the beginning of the lawsuits.”
http://www.reuters.com/articlePrint?articleId=INN2351356120080523
Running mate speculation gathers pace
The Obama campaign, which many believe is coming under strong pressure from Hillary Clinton to take her on as his running mate, on Thursday would neither confirm nor deny the existence of Mr Johnson’s committee. A campaign spokesman said: “We are not commenting on this process.”
http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=fto052320080508021175&referrer_id=yahoofinance
can the party force obama to choose that dragon to be his VP? if so his campaign will be doomed!
‘can the party force obama to choose that dragon to be his VP? if so his campaign will be doomed!’
His campaign?! OBAMA will be doomed. About ten seconds after taking the oath and being sworn in as Prez there would surely be a ‘grassy knoll’ event. Heck, I’m kinda surprised there hasn’t been one already.
no doubt spearheaded by the dragon herself! i think i read here awhile back about alot of her friends and aquaintences mysteriesly dying.
That’s what I meant.
I wonder if Hillary has been practicing her ‘innocent’ face along with her ‘what tragic news for the Obama family and the nation. But I, of course, will carry on…’ face.
I hadn’t heard about her associates going to heaven early, and anyway I don’t normally get paranoid, unless it looks like fun, but jeeze, Hil just wants this soooooo baaaaaad. Look at her little eyes glitter so eagerly, so desperately!
I actually had an okay opinion of her when this campaigning started, I mean, she’s equal to about any other polititian, a lying power-grabber, what can you expect, but after watching her conduct herself in the last few months… Jeeze. Scary.
practicing her ‘innocent’ face
The Clintons have been doing that for decades. I don’t have hard numbers, but anectdotally I’m convinced that people who fall under the umbrella of “clinton associate” have a higher than normal “mysterious death” rate.
Land of the biggie house, the biggie mortgage, the biggie vehicle, the biggie belly, and the biggie cereal box.
Cereal box?
Yeah.. try this:
Open a cereal box and remove the contents, squeeze the air out of the bag and look at what five bucks got you. Somewhere in this observation is a analogy for how we make many of our purchasing decisions. Guess what that analogy would be?
Boy, you just took half the fun out of NYCityBoy’s Cheerio and Jack Daniels breakfasts.
Where is he, anyway?
Yes, I been wondering too. NYCityboyyyyyyy, where arrrrrre youuuuuuu?! HBB’s no fun with all this wussy anemic civilized discourse stuff; come back to us NYCityboy!
Perhaps his liver got so big he’s now weighted down in his bed, and is currently busy training his cats to bring him the newspaper and other essentials. Training cats to do stuff can take a lot of time, I’ve found.
I’m working on teaching mine to attack RE people. They’re catching on right fast.
All packaging, no substance.
Are you talking about trophy wives?
I’m talking about virtually everything.
The market
http://www.minyanville.com/articles/S-consumer-market-Equity-bear-U/index/a/17291
Recap
http://www.researchrecap.com/index.php/2008/05/23/2007-worst-ever-vintage-for-us-subprime-alt-a-rmbs/
Txchick57,
Finally. MLS 1008865
Did you get the pictures? (MLS still waiting on them)
Now I have to make a couple corrections to the listing.
DITHO-(The other Matt in TX)
That number doesn’t come up on Zip realty. You sure that’s the whole thing?
Try this:
http://tinyurl.com/5qlx4x
Let’s talk.
–
U of M survey says that 28% of homeowners say that they expect home prices to drop. We are a long ways from capitulation in prices.
Jas
Compare that to 100% of buyers. Cognitive dissonance.
As for that 28%, you are truly the Conquering Heroes. Hail to you, the Victors of Common Sense.
As a token to our weekend visitors, all the local gas stations raised their prices yesterday, regular now over $4/gal.
I think I’ll drive to Moab and see if their prices are lower…
I smile a lot more at the pumps these days in my little car while watching the ‘jumbo dumbo’s filling up here in Arizona.
My ‘98 Saturn, 105k, 5-speed, 33-mpg was going to get traded for something a little more appealing until $3 a gallon hit. Now I will keep the beater for another day or two. My SUV buddies keep whinning about $80 fill-ups, but driving a smaller car just won’t work for them.
March driving down for 1st time since 1979: government
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080523/us_nm/usa_driving_data_dc
The data marks the sharpest year-on-year drop for any month in the history of the agency’s reporting, which dates back to 1942.
Seems to be following housing in it’s yoy drop in prices.
Sorry if this has already been posted.
The May 17th - 23rd issue of The Economist had an interesting commentary on the fair market value accounting issue.
http://tinyurl.com/4lrbk5
Austin flipper trying to move the merchandise - remodel was done back in November which is now 6 months ago. Must be a pain to carry that in TX …
http://austin.craigslist.org/rfs/692235445.html
PRICED TO SELL!!!!
Price has been reduced from $349,900 down to $319,900 for a quick sale.
****************************************************************************************
Also available for a 2 year lease-option with 6% down which can be paid in installments.
This will be credited back to you at closing if you choose to purchase the home before or at the end of the option period.
If you choose to opt out, downpayment will be refunded back to you less a small option fee.
Completely remodeled in Nov 2007 with 35K worth of upgrades!
Ridiculous price. He needs to get well under 300K
Notice the “owners” are in San Francisco.
People should at least edit their CL listings to sound like they got their GED.
Granite kitchen? Is that like Porcelain bathroom? Granite counter tops is more like it.
Huge yard? Compared to what? Compared to a 1/10 acre Arizona stucco box backyard it’s huge..compared to a NYS Center Hall Colonial backyard it’s a patch of grass.
It has nice high ceilings in the main entry way which will gobble up kilowatts of heating/cooling energy like Cookie Monster gobbles cookies. Next case..
Good eye. There are a bunch of places like this. It’s a nice neighborhood, but it still seems like they are trying to make an easy 50k+ off some mark.
The music has stopped in Austin but folks are still dancing.
dancing alone … alone in your car with the radio up LOUD
but when it comes to selling, it takes two to tango.
And saying that “it’s the nicest house in the neighborhood” shows that they have no idea of what a value buyer looks for.
NOW if we can just get rid of the used home salesman we could save an instant 6%. Why these clowns still exist is beyond belief. Why do we put up with this scam?
WEEKEND EDITION
Bank failures to surge in coming years
IndyMac, Corus, UCBH under pressure as credit crunch slows economy
By Alistair Barr, MarketWatch
Last update: 6:27 p.m. EDT May 23, 2008
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — By April, Gary Holloway was almost three years into retirement.
He’d built a new home by a lake in Texas, bought a boat and was working on his golf game. While taking on some part-time work, Holloway also traveled for months across the U.S. with his wife, from Seattle to Washington D.C., catching up with old friends and family.
That life of leisure abruptly changed about six weeks ago when Holloway got a phone call from his former employer, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., or FDIC, which regulates U.S. banks and insures deposits.
Leaders
The world economy
Inflation’s back
May 22nd 2008
From The Economist print edition
Double-digit price rises are about to afflict two-thirds of the world’s population
Illustration by Kevin Kallaugher
RONALD REAGAN once described inflation as being “as violent as a mugger, as frightening as an armed robber and as deadly as a hit-man”. Until recently, central bankers thought that this thug had been locked up for life. Thanks to sound monetary policies, inflation worldwide had stayed low in recent years. But the mugger is back on the prowl.
Tell this is a hoax, please…
May 23, 2008 11:37 AM PDT
Housing bailout bill creates national fingerprint registry
Posted by Declan McCullagh 10 comments
The Senate housing bill approved by a committee this week was already drawing fire from fiscal conservatives and financially responsible homeowners opposed to bailing out housing speculators.
Now it may be time to add privacy advocates to the chorus of voices urging President Bush to veto the bill, which could put taxpayers on the hook for billions of bailout dollars in new taxes or deficit spending.
Buried in the text of the revised legislation, approved by the Senate Banking Committee by a 19-2 vote this week, is a plan to create a new national fingerprint registry. It covers just about everyone involved in the mortgage business, including lenders, “loan originators,” and some real estate agents.
I call bullsh!t on this “bigger banks are better fit” opinion. The biggest banks on the planet have shown themselves perfectly capable of losing some of the biggest fortunes ever thrown away in the modern history of business. The thing which provides them with survival advantage is free bailout insurance policies, not some magical ability to provide more liquidity after pouring unprecedented amounts of money down the drain. This principle was amply demonstrated to the whole world by the Northern Rock and CFC rescue efforts.
Big is better amid subprime meltdown
Ian Jackson
Monday, May 19, 2008
Banks are prone to failure. They drive markets from a number of angles: they execute business within markets; they provide leverage and their capitalized value dominates most indexes.
…
So, which banks are most at risk in a panic contagion scenario?
Bentley points to a connection between risk and scale: The larger the bank, the less likely it is to fail. Panic drains the liquidity from banks and larger banks have more assets and the ability to provide more liquidity. However, even the largest of banks has the potential to fail.
The best solution for depositors is to take the Tom Peters approach to business generally: Get big, get niche or get out.
Hedge Funds in Swaps Face Peril With Rising Junk Bond Defaults
By David Evans
May 20 (Bloomberg) — It’s Friday, March 14, and hedge fund adviser Tim Backshall is trying to stave off panic. Backshall sits in the Walnut Creek, California, office of his firm, Credit Derivatives Research LLC, at a U-shaped desk dominated by five computer monitors.
…
CDSs, which were devised by J.P. Morgan & Co. bankers in the early 1990s to hedge their loan risks, now constitute a sprawling, rapidly growing market that includes contracts protecting $62 trillion in debt.
The market is unregulated, and there are no public records showing whether sellers have the assets to pay out if a bond defaults. This so-called counterparty risk is a ticking time bomb.
“It is a Damocles sword waiting to fall,” says Soros, 77, whose new book is called “The New Paradigm for Financial Markets: The Credit Crisis of 2008 and What It Means” (PublicAffairs).
“To allow a market of that size to develop without regulatory supervision is really unacceptable,” Soros says.
`Lumpy Exposures’
The Fed bailout of Bear Stearns on March 17 was motivated, in part, by a desire to keep that sword from falling, says Joseph Mason, a former U.S. Treasury Department economist who’s now chair of the banking department at Louisiana State University’s E.J. Ourso College of Business.
The Fed was concerned that banks might not have the money to pay CDS counterparties if there were large debt defaults, Mason says.
“The Fed’s fear was that they didn’t adequately monitor counterparty risk in credit-default swaps — so they had no idea of where to lend nor where significant lumpy exposures may lie,” he says.
Those counterparties include none other than JPMorgan itself, the largest seller and buyer of CDSs known to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or OCC.
The Fed negotiated the deal to bail out Bear Stearns by allowing JPMorgan to buy it for $10 a share. The Fed pledged $29 billion to JPMorgan to cover any Bear debts.