June 11, 2008

Bits Bucket For June 11, 2008

Please post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

414 Comments »

Comment by Michael Fink
2008-06-11 05:06:45

WSJ reports today that some are buying a 2nd home with the plan to default on the first to take advantage of the greatly reduced prices (Sub required, sorry):

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121314811278463077.html

No surprise here at all, the only question is how long before the buyers of loans today won’t write anymore without a 1-2 year buffer before the loans are packaged (to see what the buyers credit REALLY looks like, not just what they were able to purchase at).

Another thing that we all predicted long ago, finally coming into the MSM.. Seems they lag by about 1yr. :)

Comment by Jwhite
2008-06-11 05:13:25

I tell you, people are smart and adaptable. You’ve got to give them that…

Comment by Jeff
2008-06-11 06:07:42

People are smart and adaptable? I can’t stand comments like this. Comments like this personify what is wrong in and with America. Whatever happened to calling a spade a spade? I prefer immoral and unethical. I’ll give you smart and adaptable.

Comment by yogurt
2008-06-11 06:25:03

Purchase mortgages in California are non-recourse. There is no contractual obligation to pay the money back in the first place. Ms. Augustine is just exercising her contractual right to give the house to the lender rather than to repay the loan.

Neither immoral nor unethical.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ostriches
2008-06-11 07:08:05

Wholly immoral and unethical.

Additionally, simply because something is allowed under the law, it does not necessarily follow that it is moral or ethical. In fact, most of the rules by which we live by and which allow us to live among one another are derived from non-legal sources such as our senses of fairness and right and wrong. When these break down, so does society.

Finally, what happens when the next house she “buys” loses another 50% of its value?

 
Comment by yogurt
2008-06-11 07:26:50

Additionally, simply because something is allowed under the law, it does not necessarily follow that it is moral or ethical.

It’s not a matter of being “allowed under the law”, it was agreed to in a contractual agreement between two parties. Statutory provisions like non-recourse form part of a contract. If the lender wants protection against walkaways it can demand - the horror - a down payment.

 
Comment by jim A
2008-06-11 07:36:24

yogurt– Or, if they dislike statutory provisions, they can simply not write loans in that state. In this day and age of interstate banking, that is an option.

 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-06-11 07:38:09

Immoral and unethical never stopped Wall Street, RE agents or mortgage brokers. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-06-11 07:46:17

Maybe a few of you haven’t noticed yet, but we are in the early throes of the breakdown of our society…

The easy indicator is the increase in non-violent theft in the wee hours, when nobody’s looking. All over the country.

Going green, recycling.

Manhole covers that cost $500 to replace, are going away in droves all over the country (600 in Philly in 1 year). The perps get $10 to $15 per manhole.

A whole house worth of copper piping might net a few hundred bucks @ the scrap dealer, but renders a house unsaleable, most excellent for squatting.

There’s a few hundred bucks of Platinum in a catalytic converter, and it takes a few minutes to creep under a larger SUV and convert it into cash (the perps make off with $25). You need a new converter, however.

Car break-ins via the tried and true rock through the windowshield, have shattered previous records.

Statues made of stone are safe for the time being, as they have no scrap value, but heavy metal is in. How did a 15 foot high Copper statue of a miner ‘49′r stay unmolested in Los Angeles from 1925 when it was erected, until earlier this year, when thieves decapitated him @ his knees and made off with his Gold?

Electric lines use a lot of Copper wire, which isn’t worth the risk of getting yourself fried, but the perps will not be denied.

 
Comment by polly
2008-06-11 08:06:33

“Finally, what happens when the next house she “buys” loses another 50% of its value?”

She won’t be able to do it with a third loand because her credit report will show a walk away from the first one. With a non-recourse loan, the lender is obliged to take the security in lieu of payment, but it isn’t obliged to make such a loan to a person who has shown herself to be highly likely to do the walking if they don’t want to. If the lenders bothered to look at the circumstances of the first and second loans, they would have known not to make those too, but it doesn’t mean they didn’t know the rules before they did it.

 
Comment by tresho
2008-06-11 09:08:45

Maybe a few of you haven’t noticed yet, but we are in the early throes of the breakdown of our society… I don’t believe this, crime has always been with us & is just getting a lot more press and internet coverage than ever before.
Or, as Firesign Theater said:
Corn from the Indians,
Squash from the Indians,
Coal from the neighbor’s back yard!

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-06-11 09:09:59

‘I tell you, people are smart and adaptable. You’ve got to give them that…’

I only agree with the adaptable part. People ARE adaptable. But then, so are slime-molds.

 
Comment by reuven
2008-06-11 10:33:32

I tend to think it may be “unethical” to enter into a contract for the sole purpose of using an agreed upon exit option, and not with the good faith of completing its primary goal (to pay off the house.)

However, it’s perfectly legal!

What’s 100% IMMORAL and UNETHICAL, but also legal, is the fact that the government subsidizes this behavior! For example, you get a mortgage for $500,000. You walk away. Bank sells it for $300,000. Issues you a statement saying you earned $200,000 in “forgiven mortgage debt”

In a just society, you’d have to pay $70,000 federal income taxes on that very real income–the forgiven debt. But congress passed and the President signed a bill making forgiven mortgage debt nontaxable.

There’s really no difference between giving someone a $70,000 tax break and writing someone a check for $70,000. Can you imagine the outrage if the average citizen understood that the U.S. government is writing checks for $70,000 to get-rich-quickers?

I understand a no-recourse loan. It even makes some sense when buying a house in normal times. The banks were idiots for not requiring a 20% down payment. In fact, if they did, we wouldn’t be in this mess!

 
Comment by Bloz
2008-06-11 18:57:09

It’s obvious that your real name is not Donald Trump.

 
 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-06-11 06:46:39

I’m talking in terms of adapting to their environments, not morals or ethics - in which case I’d agree with you.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by mariner22
2008-06-11 09:09:56

Is this any more immoral and unethical than buying USO or oil futures with no intention of ever taking delivery of oil just to make a buck which results in some food bank being unable to procure food due to transportation costs? What about preventing a poor nurse’s aide making a modest income from driving to care for a disabled child?

Either eliminate non-recourse loans or better yet, eliminate the non-recourse status for those holding more than one first mortgages. Don’t whine about unethical behavior - it was unethical for banks to take other people’s money and “loan” it out to people who had no means to ever pay it back.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-06-11 09:16:48

Comment by Jeff
2008-06-11 06:07:42
People are smart and adaptable? I can’t stand comments like this. Comments like this personify what is wrong in and with America. Whatever happened to calling a spade a spade? I prefer immoral and unethical. I’ll give you smart and adaptable.

And I’ll give you a spade and call it a ’shovel’. Oh, and I’ll also give you some high blood pressure. Jeebus, RELAX, man! Or, if you prefer, RELAX, bipedal meat structure!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Joe Lawyer
2008-06-11 10:03:39

Ok. You are delusional on a few levels.

1. What made America “wrong” today?

- Rampant corporatization of our society. Everything is done to help the big boyz bottom line. But you keep pulling at that yoke, sucker, while they keep shipping the jobs overseas and avoiding taxes so you and your family get left holding the used husk of America. What is wrong is that our government is for the rich and the corporate campaign donors exclusively.

The only hope for America is for a “day of the rope” when all of the government workers and politicians dance on air from lamp-posts. I just pray it happens sooner rather than later. Food riots in DC might just be the match that will spawn the cleaning that city really needs.

2. Calling a “Spade a Spade” is a euphemism for calling a black person a n*gger, it has nothing to do with shovels, so you may want to drop it from your vernacular.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Al
2008-06-11 10:09:04

“2. Calling a “Spade a Spade” is a euphemism for calling a black person a n*gger, it has nothing to do with shovels, so you may want to drop it from your vernacular.”

Really? I thought it was a card (diamond, hearts, clubs…) reference.

 
Comment by somedude
2008-06-11 10:13:02

re: 2)

Maybe in your neck of the woods. It’s long since been generalized into another version of “if it walks like a duck…” for the majority of the US, though.

 
Comment by Al
2008-06-11 10:15:31

Took a look at Wiki on it.

Looks like it was sort of about shovels originally (more about being direct, as Olygal intended), then later was used as a slur. Never about cards.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_call_a_spade_a_spade

 
Comment by Bad Chile
2008-06-11 11:04:24

Good. Then we don’t need to go into the origin of the term “nitty gritty”.

Google it. Not appropriate for a family forum.

 
Comment by bluprint
2008-06-11 11:15:45

I’ve lived in the south my whole life and never heard that. Maybe it’s a yankee/westerner thing. Those folks I think have a tendency to turn everything into racism.

 
Comment by MazNJ
2008-06-11 11:16:10

It is not a racial slur:

http://www.yaelf.com/aueFAQ/miftocllspdspd.shtml

It derives from an ancient Greek expression: _ta syka syka, te:n skaphe:n de skaphe:n onomasein_ = “to call a fig a fig, a trough a trough”. This is first recorded in Aristophanes’ play _The Clouds_ (423 B.C.), was used by Menander and Plutarch, and is still current in modern Greek. There has been a slight shift in meaning: in ancient times the phrase was often used pejoratively, to denote a rude person who spoke his mind tactlessly; but it now, like the English phrase, has an exclusively positive connotation. It is possible that both the fig and the trough were originally sexual
symbols.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-06-11 12:13:21

Joe Lawyer, the top part of the post you responded to was from ‘Jeff’. Hence the ‘Comment by Jeff’ part that you may perceive, should you re-read my post.

I personally don’t find anything wrong with America today. It has been quite a lovely Wednesday so far.

 
 
Comment by cactus
2008-06-11 10:52:22

this was common back in Cali in the 1993-1995 housing recession and people who did it have nice big houses now while I stuck it out in my underwater Townhome for 16 years.

Nothing happened to them and no one gave me a reward for sticking it out . So what would you do?

I sold the Townhome in 2006 this is all deja Vu to me, oh except gas prices are going sky high now so its worse.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by FP
2008-06-11 08:50:25

“What goes around comes around”. Yep, people are adaptable but at the end, they will get it in the ass.

Comment by newt
2008-06-11 10:00:49

“Yep, people are adaptable but at the end, they will get it in the ass.”

Not sure this would qualify as Confucian doctrine, but I like it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by nhz
2008-06-11 05:13:44

this clearly shows that credit is still way too easy …

Comment by oc-ed
2008-06-11 10:10:27

I agree nhz. How can any lender approve someone for a new loan who is already servicing a loan that is larger? Back in 1998 I was turned down by BofA because I was still on the note for a house I bought in a previous marriage. This despite the fact that my ex was a millionaire and had never missed a payment and I had signed a quit claim. It is clear that the lenders have not yet felt enough pain to return to the stricter pre-bubble policies.

 
 
Comment by joe
2008-06-11 05:19:11

The one woman highlighted in the story is going to just purchase the same type of home in the same neighborhood but for 200k less and then bail on the overpriced one she bought at the height of the bubble. Except for the hit on her credit, the end state she will achieve is no different than a principal write-down. This should be telling banks that they need to start modifying loans and putting principal write down on the table as an option, otherwise bubble buyers are going to walk and leave you with an even greater loss. Banks created this bubble with all the loose lending that created artificial demand and they gamed the system to insure the loans would go through, so they made their bed and now are just going to have to lay in it. But they do have a choice as to whether or not they get smothered by the bedding or not. Right now by taking a hard line and refusing to modify loans, they will be smothered to death, but if they cut out the fat from the loans (that they created/stoked) and keep the loans in a paid/performing status then they just might keep the pillow off their face. Its all up to the banks.

Comment by jeff saturday
2008-06-11 05:37:54

This should be telling Sen. Dodd that a lot of these poor “victims” bought in to this mania to make money and when it didn`t work out, oh well, to hell with what I signed, to hell with my neighbors, to hell with the tax payers I`ll be fine.

 
Comment by SubKommander Dred
2008-06-11 06:01:05

The thing is, Joe, if banks started to do this (write down prinicipals on the loan), wouldn’t this cause a significant ‘Mark to Market’ effect, thus causing a serious loss of value to their book of loan and raise all sorts of hell with their investors? Wouldn’t their stock ratings (for whetever they are worth) take a an even worse dive? Not to mention whatever regulatory oversight agencies may be roused from their perpetual slumber and be forced to actually hold someone to account to making all manner of shoddy loans in the first place? My knowledge of the banking and finance industry is rather uneducated and unsophistacated (I mean, all those MBA’s and Econ PhD’s at Citi, Countrywide, Bear Stearns ect, are so much better informed than I about how these sorts of things work) but it would seem to me that the banks will catch on at some point and look very seriously at who is buying what house for how much, and more importantly look at the what they owe or how upside down they are on their present house.

What a big damn mess this is turning out to be…

SubKommander Dred

Comment by joe
2008-06-11 06:27:34

Yes, but this article illustrates that its happening anyway in a manner that is less controlled by the banks and produces greater losses for them.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by 45north
2008-06-11 06:42:23

Sub Kommander: I’m with Joe
Banks created this bubble with all the loose lending that created artificial demand and they gamed the system to insure the loans would go through, so they made their bed and now are just going to have to lay in it.

and your point Sub:
wouldn’t this cause a significant ‘Mark to Market’ effect, thus causing a serious loss of value to their book of loan and raise all sorts of hell with their investors?
well yes it would, so the banks are now zombie banks - they see imminent danger and don’t react - they are zombies but they deceive us by their paralysis

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2008-06-11 07:41:13

They may have made their bed, however all of us are going to end up sleeping in it. Bob meet Carol, Carol meet Ted, Ted meet Alice, etc..

 
 
 
Comment by auger-inn
2008-06-11 06:09:00

The banks could probably put an end to this practice today by simple contract language on the new loan making it a fraud to not disclose a pending default or by making the new loan callable in the event of an unrelated RE loan default within a certain period after close, something like that. Attorney’s live for this crap. I’m certain there is an attorney who could come up with legal language to shut this door.

Comment by Al
2008-06-11 06:18:17

And of course we all know that someone buying a house would never consider committing fraud.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 06:32:37

Of course we know that in recent years, the rules were exercised to reward those who were perpetrating fraud.

 
 
Comment by Rally
2008-06-11 07:15:13

Why would the bank issuing the loan for the 2nd home care? They aren’t out the money on the first foreclosure, assuming the buyer uses a different bank. Also, the buyer has now ruined his credit. He won’t be able to repeat the process in the next year, so bank #2 stands a pretty good chance of getting their payments.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by zeropointzero
2008-06-11 09:25:39

They should care because it helps promote the atmosphere that people can walk away from their current loans, as well.

I’m suprised people can easily qualify for a the escape home easily enough with another home (without any equity) already on the books — isn’t underwriting supposed to be getting tougher?

 
Comment by deflationaryjane
2008-06-11 09:39:15

That reminds me of companies who like to issue credit cards and consumer loans to people a few years out of BK because the consumer will have to wait x number of years to BK again.

It’s like sleeping with a woman who is already pregnant, is she going to become more pregnant by you?

 
Comment by bobo
2008-06-11 10:59:34

If banks were properly qualifying the mortgage applicants, they should be able to quickly see that the income levels don’t support holding another loan. This is precisely why FICO and credit scores alone cannot be used, but the bank should be looking at income and assets as well. I agree the FB is doing something borderline fraud and immoral, but this is the bank’s money and they need to do some due diligence. We don’t think much of an investor who loses his shirt buying into a CEO’s hype and never bothered to check their financial statements… this isn’t that different.

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-06-11 17:25:28

Was at mortgage brokers, for loan for new house prior to selling old. They say that the second lien (65%+25%+10% down) might not accept the offer letter of my new job for salary verification. OK, I say, if that happens, I’ll just go with a 90%+10% down loan. The broker didn’t look too enthused… why? I realized right after I said it, that it was likely because instead of a no brainer 65% first lien he’d then have the risk of a 90% first lien. Apparently, they were able to make the second lender happy.

Well, at least they poked into our finances before approving us. Progress, even if of the “small steps” variety.

 
 
 
Comment by Ostriches
2008-06-11 07:12:07

Joe:

I agree to a point, but would add that it was not solely that banks fault and the people who took on the loans/homes should be held accountable. If not, no lesson is learned and you get people doing exactly what this woman is doing. Wash, rinse, repeat.

 
Comment by jim A
2008-06-11 07:41:51

Somebody would actually have to okay a principal writedown. Their name would be on the paperwork and if the borrower defaulted ANYWAY a year later, the evidence of their mistake would be there when the head count was being chopped. OTOH, the default =>NOD => foreclosure train goes on without any bank officer taking individual responsibility for it’s actions. Rush was right: “If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.” But the responsiblity is diffuse.

Comment by bobo
2008-06-11 11:18:30

I don’t think any bank could stay solvent if they wrote down the principal of all their loans. You can bet that if they do this for some, then everyone will ask for their writedown. FNM and FRE sold off a couple trillions worth of MBS? Even a 10% writedown will translate to several hundred billion in losses across all the loans originated since 2003 or so.
Besides, what CDO holder will agree to this? The only benefit for banks may be that this helps put a floor because many buyers might jump in (with an implied writedown put.) But look how well that is working out for the IBs after the BSC bailout. After a month long bounce, it seems people are catching on that the credit crisis isn’t over and maybe the Fed doesn’t have bottomless bags of money for bailouts.

The banks can put in new language on new contracts, but I just saw stats that foreclosures in CA just went up again to a new record last month.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by MDMORTGAGEGUY
2008-06-11 19:14:45

IM not sure how many people in this forum got your reference but, i love that song and that lyric. Im guessing most are scratching their head thinking,”i don’t remember limbaugh ever saying that?”

-freewill for those that didnt get it

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by ex-nnvmtgbrkr
2008-06-11 08:31:55

The principle write-down ain’t gonna work if unless they drop the recapture. You know, that little “by the way” that says that the lender will recapture any fuure appreciation or at least a large portion of it should the “homeowner” (yeah right) refinance or sell. When the FB figures that part out then buying and walking on the current mortgage will still be a financially wiser mover (I won’t even get into the ethical part of this). The borrower will realize that he/she won’t see future appreciation for years to come, and when he/she does, they’ll have to share it with the bank. Why not buy now and walk realizing that by the time houses start appreciating again your credit will be fixed and you won’t have to share your gains with the bank.

Again, the write-down won’t work without eliminating the recapture, and I’m confident banks won’t do that. Another worhtless solution bites the dust!

Comment by deflationaryjane
2008-06-11 09:44:36

excellent point, I’d forgotten about recapture on the ‘free pony’ (my term for the Hope Now program) loans.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-06-11 17:27:51

Why won’t it work? (Do you really think the FB will change its spots and actually read and comprehend the new contract? Well, maybe, like all cunning jungle creatures, they have an instinct for profit. But, do they still have a functioning instinct for danger?)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by reuven
2008-06-11 10:42:45

The banks were idiots to make these loans, but if they do the math and they decide they’d lose less with a cram-down, go do it!

What I don’t like is:

1. Barney Frank MANDATING that banks do this. Sometimes you just don’t want to reward an obvious scam artist.

2. The fact that the FB doesn’t have to pay INCOME TAX on the amount of the cram-down. That’s OUTRAGEOUS, esp. because we’re taking about large amounts of $$$, and the Dems want so badly to raise my taxes.

 
 
Comment by combotechie
2008-06-11 05:28:35

“Another thing that we all predicted long ago, finally coming into the MSM. Seems they lag by about 1 yr.”

For most people news isn’t news until the MSM makes it official by reporting it as news.
People don’t seem to see or understand what is going on in the world around them until the MSM indentifies and explains it to them. It is then that people suddenly “get it” and become emotionally tied into whatever news that the MSM has made fashionable. It is then that the shearing of the sheeple commences.

IMO.

Comment by Ben Jones
2008-06-11 05:36:30

The Sacramento Bee had an article on this long ago, complete with a lady doing it.

Comment by NotInMontana
2008-06-11 05:56:45

You can tell these stories too soon. Unless the readers getting reinenforcement from other sources, it just just goes over their heads and it’s like it was never published. Then two years later everyone’s up in arms about the same issue you wrote about before.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-06-11 05:32:30

“In some cases, homeowners are coached through the buy-and-bail process by real-estate agents and brokers who see nothing wrong with it. Some blame the phenomenon in part on lenders’ unwillingness to cut deals or restructure loans made when home prices were inflated.”

So their encouraging defaults? Isn’t this a bit like eating their own?

I find it somewhat shocking that there is no shame in this either. The parties not only agree to do it, they have no qualms about putting their names in a major newspaper clearly stating their intent. What happens when the “me” decade grows up.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-06-11 06:42:36

The agents could care less where the churn comes from. Not only is it never a bad time to buy - there is never a bad reason for buying.

That’s what happens when a profession that contributes absolutely nothing to the productivity of this nation is tolerated, and by some even admired.

If globalization and technology have any redeeming qualities whatsoever it will be to rid us of the agents once and for all. Heaven knows that those forces have already cost us far more valuable jobs on our shores.

Comment by CrackerJim
2008-06-11 07:06:33

I think you mean …could NOT care less..

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Rally
2008-06-11 07:18:14

“So their encouraging defaults? Isn’t this a bit like eating their own?”

Yes.

Once you stop being shocked by this you will understand the nature of used house salesmen. The next commission is all that matters. Once they get that, they have no incentive to care what happens.

Comment by Ed G
2008-06-11 07:51:31

When I worked as a comissioned salesperson at Sears, they had a system in place to prevent this behavior. If you sold a TV and it was returned, the comission was taken back out of your pay the next paycheck. Therefore, you had a very good incentive to make sure the customer didn’t get buyers remorse. Sears had a VERY liberal return policy and you could get whacked with a return as far as two years later. I essentially had ’skin in the game’. Realtors definitely do not and have no obligation to anyone after they have cut their check.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Rally
2008-06-11 10:08:21

“When I worked as a comissioned salesperson at Sears, they had a system in place to prevent this behavior.”

When I worked for a used car dealer, thye made a ton of money from the banks by charging higher interest rates than the customer qualified for. Standard practice really, though sometimes the spread might be up to 4%. If the customer signed the papers, walked out and refinanced a week later, the bank would charge the finance premium back to the dealership - we’d just get a big statement and have to research which deal came from which F&I salesman.

Management didn’t really care enough to put a good system in place to charge those back to the salesman, probably because turnover was so high. By the time we got the bank statement, half the sales staff had changed anyway.

 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-06-11 07:58:02

“Once you stop being shocked”

Oh I wasn’t shocked by that part…as supported by the fact that the many realtors associated w/my home sales freak over all the proof I’ve asked the different parties to produce before I sign anything. Brokers and lawyers could be heard rolling their eyes over the phone too. Although the Wells Fargo rep in 1999 was excellent.

I was simply pointing out that it’s another thing the blog predicted years ago.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Jon
2008-06-11 09:17:45

And that is the way Wall Street and much of corporate America works. The incentive to do whatever scam is necessary to show income growth for the next quarter is far too high for executive management and short term investors.

Which is why wanting the government to deregulate industry is insane. Competition forces corporate leaders to quickly move to the sleaziest ways of doing business. With the inevitable result of massive losses. But the executives and short term investors get out with huge gains, so why should they care?

Of course their is huge cash payments to congress to deregulate by the scammers, and the sheeple have been indoctrinated into believing that government can do no right, so off the cliff we go…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by reuven
2008-06-11 10:52:20

Why haven’t any of our Liberal Leaders proposed going after the Realtor(TM) industry!? You’d think they’re would be wide public support for putting these companies on trial for fraud/conspiracy/etc. And at least taking their money to give to poor specu-vestors who “lost their homes” is less morally repulsive than taking *my* money to do it!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by BubbleViewer
2008-06-11 05:34:04

Yes, this is what I heard my relative, who works for Countrywide, is planning to do. She bought a huge house in Roseville in Dec. 2005 and that house has lost 50% of value; now plans to buy another house and then let the first house foreclose.
I have no idea where people’s sense of ethics has gone. If this is what people are doing so they can buy houses, then I will continue renting, thank you. But I have a feeling this is just a sign that there is a lot more fraud and easy money to be shaken loose, leading up to the 2010-2011 bottom

Comment by Michael Fink
2008-06-11 05:43:39

Well, I don’t condone this behavior.

However, I have a feeling that most of the people doing this are just following the “ethics” that they see exhibited every day on Wall St or in their local bank. Just like all the CEOs that run the companies into the ground then get their 100M dollar buyout at the close; that’s the behavior that these people are imitating.

It’s not the “right” moral thing to do. But when you look at it from a purely business perspective, it’s absolutely the right thing to do! People are looking at this less emotionally and more like a stock trader/CEO; if I can make money (or lose less) on the deal, then it’s a good deal, those that hurt be dam*ed.

Actually, although I don’t agree with it, it’s nice to see the banks getting a taste of their own medicine. This is what they have been doing forever (looking at everything at pure business, no ethics), so it’s kind of funny to think that when the sheeple wake up and start throwing that back at them, it may spell the demise for many!

Comment by txchick57
2008-06-11 05:50:50
(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by teufelhunden
2008-06-11 07:04:29

How dare you link something unfavorable about Obama. He’s going to save our country - I mean, didn’t he use the word “change” in one of his speeches?

But God forbid anyone vote for Ron Paul, that guy is nuts - he calls for change, but sounds like he actually means it.

Sarcasm off//

 
Comment by wmbz
2008-06-11 07:20:21

“But God forbid anyone vote for Ron Paul, that guy is nuts - he calls for change, but sounds like he actually means it”.

And can lay out his plan, I’m writing him in. If people think he’s a nut imagine what they would think if Thomas Jefferson were standing on the podium today?

 
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2008-06-11 07:27:40

“…appointees whom he has assigned the most important and intimate of tasks”

Vice President….Oh, its so critical, lets all be afraid, lets get really worried & lose some sleep over it.

Here’s the Republicans problem regarding the current War Czar:

“…his favorability ratings are near toxic lows.” :-)

“Dickey Boy” might as well spend Martin Luther King day duck hunting in Crawford Texas. ;-)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080611/pl_politico/11000

“She started it!”
“Did not”
“Did so”
“Did not”
“Did so”
……….Huge slap with a 20# trout…..thud…(body slams to the floor)
“dazed / moaning”………..”I’m telling Dad”

running /yelling: “Beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn!” ;-)

 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-06-11 07:44:14

McSame was just on TV saying that he supported housing bailouts, economic stimulus packages, and windfall profits on the oil companies…but is sure is convenient to only paint Obama with that brush!

The Reps are completely blind to the evils of their own, which is why they got (and continue to get away with) raping the country.

 
Comment by peaceful
2008-06-11 08:03:31

With Obama at least we have a *guarantee* that there will be some changes of some sort (how could there NOT be?) . . . all government is corrupt, but at least he will bring something new . . . so bored with the complacent people who don’t think the current legacy needs to be thrown out on its @SS!!!!!! : )

How dare they lie to us about EVERYTHING and still have supporters? sheeple, sheeple, sheeple baaaaaaaah

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-06-11 09:22:26

‘McSame’

That’s funny. May I borrow that?

 
Comment by yogurt
2008-06-11 09:38:14

If people think he’s a nut imagine what they would think if Thomas Jefferson were standing on the podium today?

In Jefferson’s time the president was not popularly elected.

He was also not a Christian, which all by itself would make him unelectable today, if not in his own day.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible

 
Comment by Mole Man
2008-06-11 10:04:46

They are both very nice candidates, but they both talk a lot. Wear a gaffe mask and a gag bib while listening to them for the next five months.

 
Comment by reuven
2008-06-11 10:54:16

Under Obama’s plan, I’ll get to keep 35 cents of every additional dollar I earn. Is that the “change” he keeps talking about?

 
 
Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 05:53:10

“However, I have a feeling that most of the people doing this are just following the “ethics” that they see exhibited every day on Wall St or in their local bank.”

And Mike Fink hits another bullseye.

As I’ve said before, we’ve been *LED* here. Call it poor judgement, poor practice, criminal or whatever but whats good for Wall St is good for Main Street.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ostriches
2008-06-11 07:21:17

Reminds me of a saying probably spoken by each of your mothers, “If your friends all jumped off a bridge…”

I believe that I also recall some Nazi concentration camp guys kind of saying the same thing, “Well, everyone else was doing it…”

 
Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 08:06:23

Hmmmm….. murder and thievery are the same?

pleeeez…

 
Comment by tresho
2008-06-11 09:15:36

“Ostriches” comment was valid & useful. Hmmmm….. murder and thievery are the same? is just a pot shot.

 
Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 09:22:42

In your opinion. Thank you.

 
Comment by Seattle Renter
2008-06-11 15:57:58

When MANY seniors are forced to choose between the medicine that keeps them alive or food, you’re goddamn right they are the same thing.

My mom was a good Republican™ for over 50 years, but she sent the last request from them back with a huge “f*ck you!”

 
Comment by Seattle Renter
2008-06-11 16:29:41


Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 08:06:23

Hmmmm….. murder and thievery are the same?

pleeeez…

When we have seniors, way too many seniors, who have to regularly choose between buying food and buying lifesaving medicine, you’re G0DD@MN right they are the same thing.

 
 
Comment by nhz
2008-06-11 05:56:26

trouble is that it is not the banks getting a taste of their own medicine - it is often foreign pension funds, municipalities and small investors that have hardly any control over what these banks are doing with their investment money. They are getting a very expensive lesson, and ultimately it is (mostly foreign) taxpayers who are going to pay for this, not the banks (or the crooks that operate them).

I’m happy that in Netherlands this trick is not possible, you can’t simply walk away from a mortgage. But in reality there are other tricks available here for those who know how the system works (like using the National Mortgage Insurance and sometimes bankruptcy procedures). And worse, nobody cares about all the fraud that is happening because home prices in Netherlands are still rising, so the losses are relatively small.

I agree with BubbleViewer that there is still loads of fraud and easy money that needs to be shaken out of the mortgage markets. And I don’t think that will happen as long as central banks like the FED and ECB are in control.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2008-06-11 06:11:09

Great post, Michael.

And nhz, I really don’t think we should let the shareholders off the hook either. The whole problem with corporate law and the principle of limited liability is that it encourages providers of capital to look at their investments purely as a numbers game, and to turn a blind eye to any questionable, immoral, or downright evil behavior on the part of corporate management.

When you invest in stock, you are assisting a business enterprise in what should be honest and productive economic work. If this enterprise takes a wrong turn and engages in corrupt and immoral behavior, there is no justice in allowing stockholders to ignore that behavior and escape blame. Real reforms here should start by repealing corporate law and limited liability.

 
Comment by bluprint
2008-06-11 06:13:48

Well said LVG. People that own these stocks want zero liability for the actions of their companies and gauranteed returns. It’s sickening. Let the owners go down with their miserable companies.

 
Comment by nhz
2008-06-11 07:11:43

LVG: I agree regarding shareholders in general, but the reality if far more difficult. The Dutch pension fund ABP is one of the big players in the worldwide shares and mortgage markets (they even own a few big hedgefunds). ABP invests the pensions of government workers who have close to zero influence regarding investment policy, even though THEIR money (future pension) is at stake.

I know some guys who have asked questions about this to the management again and again, e.g. regarding the huge investments in US mortgage paper, but management does not listen (in fact they usually even refuse to answer questions about those kinds of subject). Management is appointed by politics and not by the ’shareholders’.

If the pension fund management gambles away the money, the Dutch government will probably increase taxes so that pensions for the government workers are guaranteed (after all there are many politicians among those workers). The managers will be fired with multi-million euro golden parachutes in the worst case, and probably they will all keep their well-paid jobs despite stupid decisions. For those in charge of investment decisions there is zero risk and liability - so they will simply continue investing in the favorite sh** of their bankster friends, like US mortgage paper.

 
Comment by tresho
2008-06-11 09:22:05

Real reforms here should start by repealing corporate law and limited liability. I doubt this will happen, there are sound reasons behind the existence of corporations, think of hospitals, colleges, sewer districts, etc., which perform vital functions hard to duplicate in other ways. However, corporate law needs drastic revision, including a corporate death penalty for those entities which behave destructively towards the society at large. They shoot horses, don’t they?

 
Comment by Seattle Renter
2008-06-11 16:25:19

Real reforms here should start by repealing corporate law and limited liability.

HERE HERE! A good start would be that money != Free speech when it’s from a corporate entity, and that the rights of the legally fictitious corporate “person” should NEVER exceed those of actual people. In fact they should be legally subordinate to actual living people.

As for hospitals, colleges, and sewer districts, I would agree to having an exception to the limited liability “clamp down” for them as long as they are non profit, and perform some sort of REAL public good.

 
 
Comment by cynicalgirl
2008-06-11 06:36:17

You are 100% correct. When George Bailey was giving you the loan, you had to look at him when you ran into him while shopping. Now these banks are this faceless thing that’s charging them 30% interest on their credit cards. What’s not to hate about them?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2008-06-11 08:21:43

Every January, Tucson has a celebration called Dillinger Days. It commemorates the capture of outlaw John Dillinger (who was part of the Pierpont Gang of bank robbers) back in 1934.

This year’s celebration included a talk by a retired Tucson Fire Department captain who’s also a historian. At the beginning of his talk, he asked us to name some notable bank robbers from the Depression era. Of course, everyone rattled off John Dillinger’s name.

Then the other names started flying. Pretty Boy Floyd. Bonnie and Clyde. Al Capone. Baby Face Nelson.

And why, after all these years, are these names still so familiar? Because those guys and gals had become folk heroes. After all, back in the 1930s, people were losing their farms and their homes because they couldn’t afford them any longer. The banks were taking them back, and believe me, that sure didn’t make the banks popular.

So, the bank robbers were the 1930s version of that latter-day expression, “Stick it to the Man.”

 
Comment by Tulkinghorn
2008-06-11 13:30:02

“In all my years of travel I’ve seen many funny men,
Some will rob you with a six-gun,
Some with a fountain pen.”

–Woody G.

 
 
 
Comment by Fuzzy Bear
2008-06-11 05:43:51

I have no idea where people’s sense of ethics has gone.

This type of activity goes well beyond ethics as it may well be criminal to knowingly and intentionally use a financial instrument to commit fraud against a lending institution.

You might suggest to your relative to talk to a criminal lawyer to see how much time she may spend in prison!

Comment by realestateskeptic
2008-06-11 06:49:59

I have never understood non-recourse states. If you are not willing to take a risk on your own home, why should the Bank????????? While Banks rarely pursue or recover on deficiency judgments (what they actually got at foreclosure vs. what was owed) the prospect of doing so might be enough to stop this behavior. Just change that law and this stuff may subside. I am sure it will never happen in CA though.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NotInMontana
2008-06-11 08:55:39

It’s a populist political move, like raising the homestead exemption. At some point you can’t get any more out of people.

My own view is kinda nuanced: if an FB realizes they’re in over their head, dumps the house and goes back to renting, there’s some dignity in that. But if an FB is still trying to speculate & flip, thinks they can make a killing if they wait it out, is just going back for more, it’s more unethical than the FB who just plain bails.

 
Comment by JC_Renter
2008-06-11 09:13:03

These laws grew out of the Depression era, and was a populist response to personal liabilities after the bank takes your house. In theory, the lender should have priced the risk when making the loans.

 
Comment by Jon
2008-06-11 09:34:43

It is a regulatory deterrent to banks to lend more than a house is worth according to historical standards. Because banks have the historical knowledge, experts, lawyers, etc… necessary to properly manage the transaction, and most individuals don’t, it puts the responsibility on the bank to make sure the transaction is honest and clean.

The system works well. Unless, of course, you deregulate the industry and allow the banks to slice & dice the mortgages into CDO’s, pay Fitch hush money to call them AAA, and sell them to foreign investors.

 
Comment by Kim
2008-06-11 10:11:47

“I have never understood non-recourse states.”

I suppose an FB in a recourse state would have to file bankruptcy to erase any deficiency judgement. So part of the reasoning for non-recourse could be to discourage the FB from defaulting on other debts in addition to the mortgage. An FB filing bankruptcy is going to lump ALL their debts in the filing, whereas someone dropping off the keys in Cali may still be paying to keep their car, credit cards, etc.

 
Comment by realestateskeptic
2008-06-11 11:23:49

I think those all make sense, but don’t match as well with the modern realities (good point Jon). If I had 20% skin in the game, then that was OK as a stop loss limit; I could see that. But if I have no money down and roll in the closing costs, other than my credit score/report, what do I have to lose? It seems to really encourage speculation. Does anyone have access to foreclosure stats broken down by recourse and non-recourse states? Not sure it would show much but would be interesting.

If the Banks are figuring it in to the deal, aren’t the rest of us responsible folks paying that premium? I’d take a recourse loan at .50% or .75% less.

The homestead exemption is equally abusive in some states. Should I be able to walk away from bills, Judgments, you name it, and still keep $500,000 equity in my house? Try explaining this to a small painter, plumber, contractor whose $15,000 bill didn’t get paid and is SOL.

Just my 2 cents. All good points and thanks for the chance to have discussions of this stuff without the usual Internet flaming.

 
 
 
Comment by SFC
2008-06-11 06:08:45

Wouldn’t Countrywide fire her for this? Unless she’s getting her loans from somebody else, I would think fraud against your own employer is very bad form.

Comment by BubbleViewer
2008-06-11 06:44:46

I should have said a relative who “used to work for countrywide.” Last time I spoke a year ago, the relative was looking for other work in the equally reputable field of pharmaceutical sales and has probably found it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2008-06-11 08:36:37

You mean she is going to be a delivery person who brings free food to the staff in doctor’s offices in return for the doctor (who gets to stiff staff on wages because they get breakfast and lunch for free) over or inappropriately prescribing her employer’s products?

That is one dirty business. And the scenario I described is the cleanest version. Old style is the doc get free vacations, theater tickets, etc. in exchange for over or inappropriately prescribing the products. Direct payments of cash are usually for giving speeches saying the drug is better than other, cheaper effective alternatives, but that happens above the level of the salesperson.

 
Comment by newt
2008-06-11 10:31:08

I worked with a guy that quit a lucrative pharmaceutical sales job because he said he couldn’t live with himself anymore while doing it.

 
Comment by gascap
2008-06-11 11:22:57

I have a close friend who quit being a lawyer after 2 years because it was such a “negative line of work”.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Ann
2008-06-11 05:57:39

As usual the WSJ is behind the times..this has been going in since late last year..as more and more homeowners saw the house down the block worth 40% less than what they paid for theirs..

Many of these purchases are being done under a family name to protect the home from being attached with judgements..

Can’t say I blame them..especially if they have kids and can keep them in the same school district and cut their bills in half..

Use the system as long as you can..

Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-06-11 06:26:08

“Can’t say I blame them..”

I’m not meaning to pick on you Ann w/this response. This is just a general comment on the phenomenon.

If contractual obligations are no longer mandatory, it means we, as a nation, no longer value the part good faith plays in our financial system.

I hope we’re ready for the repercussions of that.

 
Comment by spike66
2008-06-11 07:11:14

“Can’t say I blame them..especially if they have kids and can keep them in the same school district and cut their bills in half”

When they abandon the first house “in the same school district” odds are the bank will not be doing any upkeep. So, there’s an abandoned house, ripe to be vandalized, or used by squatters or as a drug/party house.
This drives down the safety and values of the houses “in the same school district”. And who’s collecting the property taxes on that abandoned house? Going to be harder to maintain that school district.
Those Community Watch groups should be on this…find out who pulled this stunt in their school district and publish a list with photos. Let the neighbors and the neighborhood kids know.

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2008-06-11 06:04:51

Frankly, this is what has to happen. You have housing. You have what people can afford. They have to get together. The bubble is over.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 06:13:02

Wouldn’t defaulting on the first qualify them for a Frank-Dodd foreclosure bailout?

Comment by Housing Wizard
2008-06-11 06:44:48

People bailing on loans to buy another home is one of the reason why Congress should bring back the tax on forgiven debt for starters .Also banks should require huge down payments from someone who already owns a home who is buying another . It would be interesting to note how many buyers out there are bailing homeowners and investors .I would not find it surprising if the commissioned sales people were suggesting this “buy another and bail ” activity ,which would get that industry more sales ,including the foreclosure .

My neighbor was making offers on other houses 2 months before they walked on the property across from me ,which just sold for 100k under peak .

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-06-11 06:59:02

WSJ reports today that some are buying a 2nd home with the plan to default on the first to take advantage of the greatly reduced prices

I saw this happen a lot in San Diego during the arly 90’s price crash. There is nothing new under the sun.

 
Comment by rms
2008-06-11 07:17:18

“In some cases, homeowners are coached through the buy-and-bail process by real-estate agents and brokers who see nothing wrong with it.”

And these RE folks consider themselves professional. Criminals!

Comment by Housing Wizard
2008-06-11 09:13:15

In the final analysis this buy-and-bail activity ends up costing innocent people money . In the future, lending becomes more difficult and costly for regular honest people .It’s already clear that the Feds policies are to pass on some lender loss to the public .

When the real estate and loan industry pumped up the housing prices by faulty lending/fraud ,did they think about the costs to society ? Pools are now a health concern along with abandoned houses with the increased crime and property destruction . All this corruption is going to take a piece out of everyone .

While Wall Street might be getting their pay-back from the defaulting homeowners ,the costs is passed on to everyone in the final analysis .Just like after the big 1929 stock market crash ,even people who didn’t buy stock suffered because of that bubble when the banks failed and people loss jobs .

People should be outraged at what the real estate and loan industry did in the creation of this absurd bubble ,but the public should be even more outraged at the attempts to pass the costs of this Bubble on to the public with no Justice prevailing .

 
 
 
Comment by Jwhite
Comment by hoz
2008-06-11 05:18:23

“…The Fed operates with the U.S. in mind. It often gets away with downplaying the U.S.’s imbalances — like a current-account deficit that would sink other nations — because it prints the reserve currency. That’s why the Fed felt it could go so far to restore calm on Wall Street.

In a more closed economy, central bankers don’t have to worry much about their peers overseas. When your economy is as big and open as the U.S.’s, when capital markets are more porous than ever and when trillions of dollars are warehoused abroad, monetary-policy dynamics become more complicated….”

Thank heavens for the ability to push a blip and transfer moneys in seconds to sound currencies.

Comment by Jwhite
2008-06-11 05:25:50

I like the Japanese and Swiss varieties myself.

Comment by nhz
2008-06-11 05:47:11

like the yen, really? it just broke down (again) against the euro and is close to a new multi-year low…

not saying that the euro is sound mone, it is just a tad more solid than the US dollar - but euro has increased more than 60% vs. the yen over the last 7 years. One day there will be a yen countertrend rally, but apparently not yet.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by hoz
2008-06-11 05:56:42

Yen was 124/dollar last year and last Dec 31 was 114 to the dollar. I’ll take minor fluctuations in a crazy world knowing the fiscal responsibility and savings rate of the Japanese will more than make up for a crashing dollar. Nothing goes straight up or straight down.

Current purchasing power parity is 85Yen/dollar $1.17/1.00EU

 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-06-11 06:47:52

Half my family is Japanese so I have a vested interest… :)

 
 
 
Comment by ACH
2008-06-11 06:18:30

Hoz,
The imbalances in trade and debt are not self-correcting! The trade deficit ($61 Billion in April) is at the same level as March 07 because of expensive crude oil. So, now trade imbalances are worse in the midst of a flat or falling economy.

Note that the Fed has publicly announced that it is concerned about inflation and has implied that rates are going to be steady or rising. Note also that this announcement came just an oil price-induced increase in the US trade imbalance for April was reported. So much for a cheap dollar helping our export-based businesses and thereby helping the US economy “skirt recession”.

The Fed will be forced to “flat line” or raise rates, but not because of inflation. The Fed is being forced to avert an international dollar-dumping spree which would precipitate a global collapse. Of course the dollar will exit stage left as the worlds reserve currency as soon as things cool off a little.

Finally, raising rates in the midst of an ongoing credit crunch? Global trade taking a hit because of a US Consumer spending crunch imposing an “effective import tariff?” These two items may not cause another Great Depression ver 2.0 but they will cause a bigger and more long lasting recession than WS and Fed are willing to entertain. Why? Because these events are similar in effect but not magnitude (I sure hope not!) to the twin debacles of tight credit and Smoot-Hawley in late 1929-32. These actions aggravated a bad recession into a international nightmare.

Roidy

Comment by hoz
2008-06-11 06:42:42

I do not disagree with a word you wrote. The Federal Reserve talking about a strong dollar and inflation should make you laugh. Look at what they do, not what they say.

I disagree with what will happen. The Federal Reserve will not raise rates. Flatline, maybe but just as likely to lower rates. So far Mr. Bernanke is following the script that he wrote in a paper in 2002 on alternative ways to control a recession. Mr. Volker was not happy about the Federal Reserve’s actions. Illegal actions? maybe.

This time the governments policies seem so ‘bass ackwards’, it is scary. A strong dollar, I invested against it. Inflation, 2 yr treasuries have gone from 1.86% to 2.81% - Nobody wants a negative YTM. Ignore the 10 yrs because foreign countries are not buying those.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by vozworth
2008-06-11 07:11:22

Island nation inflation:
why are the UK and Aussie yield curves fully inverted? Is this a new fangled bond theory of which has yet to be discovered?

even Japanese rates are moving higher…rational expectations of an inverted yield curve? \

its getting ugly out there…go long window locks and safety glass in high-rise Manhattan.

 
Comment by hoz
2008-06-11 12:23:29

Hi Vozzie,

For the past 2 +years the Yen and S&P were opposites. Now the Yen is moving in tandem with the dollar. The fear is recession in Japan. A recession in Japan is not going to have the ill effects as would occur in the good ole USofA. Japan has a 31% savings rate. A lot of real money sitting on the sidelines. Something will shake Japan from the lethargy, but what or when I have no idea.

 
 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2008-06-11 06:11:37

“The dollar is clearly getting on Asia’s nerves. Aside from hitting the region’s competitiveness, the trillions of dollars of reserves held in Asia are losing value by the day.”

Tough. Did you really think the U.S. could run a current account deficit for 20 years, producing less and buying more from you, without going broke? And when the U.S. went broke, did you really expect to get back money at the same value as what you put it?

Not sustainable. Asian countries are going to have to rely on domestic demand, which means they will have to have a more equal distrubution of income so they have someone with money to sell to. Americans are going to have to live without goods from abroad subsidized by loans that will not be paid back.

The only good thing about the dollar collapse is its effect on trade. Beats distortionary anti-trade policies. And here other countries have NO RIGHT to complain.

Comment by hoz
2008-06-11 06:24:25

It is not possible to devalue the US to prosperity. TIC data suggests (there is no firm proof) that China bailed on $90B in the first quarter. That is a lot of moneys. China still has $2T in reserves, but the mix is now moving to 60% dollars. Fortunately for the $, Japan has been supporting the dollar to maintain their exports.

Comment by WT Economist
2008-06-11 07:17:40

It’s not possible to borrow your way to prosperity, either.

The trade deficit is like the housing bubble — it was only made possible by unsustainable finance. It isn’t a natural phenomenon.

No reason to keep trying to prop that up. In the long run, it is impossible, and the long run has arrived!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-06-11 07:49:53

“It’s not possible to borrow your way to prosperity, either.”

Greenspan managed to convince an entire generation of boomers that the road to riches was to steal from their grandchildren.

Many of them post here, defending their right not to pay taxes despite their party spending like a drunken sailor on payday.

 
Comment by polly
2008-06-11 09:30:22

A drunken sailor on payday is limited to his pay. A borrow and spend government can get into a lot more trouble.

 
 
Comment by ozajh
2008-06-11 07:28:54

Japan is a critical factor here, and is likely to keep its current policies in place no matter how crazy they may appear, because:
1. As you state, Japan’s export sector is so important to its economy, and
2. Japan has a declining population, which is projected to keep declining, and has no chance of reversing or even stabilising this decline. It is one of the most racially exclusionary societies in the World, so large-scale immigration is not an option. There is therefore ZERO chance that Japan can significantly raise its domestic consumption.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jon
2008-06-11 09:52:42

The upside is that Japan can effectively reduce its production capacity without reducing the standard of living of its citizenry.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by walt526
2008-06-11 05:07:35

Some Buy a New Home to Bail on the Old
Fannie Plans Rules

To Avoid Practice
Described as Fraud
By NICK TIMIRAOS

Next month, Michelle Augustine plans to walk away from her four-bedroom house in a Sacramento, Calif., subdivision and let the property fall into foreclosure. But before doing so, she hopes to lock in the purchase of another home nearby.

“I can find the same exact house as what I live in right now for half the price,” says Ms. Augustine, 44 years old, who runs a child-care service out of her home. She says she soon will be unable to afford her monthly payments, which will jump to $4,000 from $3,300 in August, and she doesn’t want to continue to own a home that is now worth $200,000 less than what she paid for it two years ago.

In markets hit hardest by falling home prices and rising foreclosures, lenders and brokers are discovering a new phenomenon: the “buy and bail,” in which borrowers with good credit buy a new home — often at a much lower price — then bail out of the “upside down” mortgage on their first home.

Homeowners are able to pull off this gambit — which some lenders and real-estate agents call mortgage fraud — by taking advantage of mortgage-lending practices that allow them to buy a new primary residence before their existing residence has been sold. And with the lending industry in disarray as it tries to restructure millions of mortgages, some boast they are able to pull off the strategy with ease…

Comment by Rally
2008-06-11 07:25:39

“Homeowners are able to pull off this gambit — which some lenders and real-estate agents call mortgage fraud — by taking advantage of mortgage-lending practices that allow them to buy a new primary residence before their existing residence has been sold. And with the lending industry in disarray as it tries to restructure millions of mortgages, some boast they are able to pull off the strategy with ease…”

Plausible deniability. No criminal intent here. “I moved in to my new house and put the old one on the market. It’s not my fault that it just didn’t sell.”

 
Comment by Kim
2008-06-11 10:23:56

“Michelle Augustine”

Well unless the reporter changed her name for the story, good luck with that plan now that your name has been plastered all over the front of the Wall Street Journal along with your stated intent to commit fraud.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2008-06-11 05:08:58

Senate Votes To Privatize…
This is funny, these clowns can’t even run a restaurant without bumming off the taxpayer. This niggling group of millionaires is so used to being subsidized I’m sure it will come as a shock when they actually had to pay the going rate. This is the crowd that is going to straighten out the ‘housing’ mess and bring us socialized health care. I’m sure they’ll keep doing a sterling job! The old saying… ‘There’s no such thing as a free lunch’ holds true.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/08/AR2008060801765.html?hpid=topnews

Comment by cynicalgirl
2008-06-11 05:28:29

Who wants “socialized health care”? It’s my understanding that both candidates plans involve insurance companies. Socialized health care is when the government pays the doctors and there is no billing or insurance.

Comment by wmbz
2008-06-11 06:01:31

Who wants “socialized health care”?

I really don’t know what McCain has up his sleeve, but I did listen to an interview with Obama a month or so ago and he stated that perhaps a system similar to the Canadians would be the best for the U.S.

Last I checked, Canada has socialized health care. I’m sure both candidates will play with the words many times between now and November.

Comment by yogurt
2008-06-11 06:36:25

Doctors in Canada are not employed by the government. They are independent business people and bill the government insurance plan for services performed. They also bill patients for non-insured services (cosmetic surgery, etc), or if the patients are from outside the country.

I have no idea if this is what Obama is actually proposing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by AdamCO
2008-06-11 07:38:36

Somehow any health care system that isn’t based on squeezing the most possible money out of people who are sick and dying is considered bad by many folks.

It isn’t like the current system is some free-market wonderland. It has been horribly corrupted by insurance monopolies and fraud.

I understand that in Canada one secretary can process the paperwork for two doctors. In the US, it is two secretaries for one doctor.

 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-06-11 07:58:05

Ask any Canadian physician how independent they are, when they cannot set their own rates and get very little input into what services should be covered from year to year. When the only payer is the government, they are effectively employees.

 
Comment by yogurt
2008-06-11 08:31:51

You mean doctors in the US can bill the health insurers at any rate they want?

Right.

 
Comment by tresho
2008-06-11 09:29:39

Ask any Canadian physician how independent they are, when they cannot set their own rates and get very little input into what services should be covered from year to year. Substitute “US” for “Canadian” in that statement & see what results you get. Walk into any hospital and ask them what they would charge you for a Complete Blood Count, at retail prices, and see how long it takes to get an answer, or whether you can even get an answer.

 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-06-11 14:46:34

US physicians can negotiate their rate, or refuse to take medicare. Many do. Too many do, because they couldn’t stay in business with the rates that are paid.

What does a CBC have to do with a physician salary? That goes to the hospital.

 
Comment by tresho
2008-06-11 15:26:11

The cost of a CBC is relevant to the compensation charged by or paid to any health provider & to the near-complete lack of transparency of costs & charges in the field.

 
 
Comment by Al
2008-06-11 06:40:51

If anyone is interested, here’s a few facts about the Canadian health care system.

1) Health care is a provincial responsibility, not federal. The federal govt does meddle, however.
2) Hospitals are private non-profit organizations.
3) The hospitals hire the doctors, nurses, x-ray techs, etc, not the government.
4) The majority of funding for the hospitals comes from the provincial governments. The rest is revenue from operations (cafeterias, gift shops, tv rental, user pay or private insurance for private rooms, renting out conference rooms, etc) or donations/lotteries.
5) There is limited private health care, which varies by province.
6) Dental care is private, and not covered under provincial health care acts.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by yogurt
2008-06-11 08:01:30

The hospitals hire the doctors, nurses, x-ray techs, etc, not the government.

With some exceptions, the doctors are not employed by hospitals. They are self-employed as I pointed out. Few doctors in Canada work on salary except those in the military, or interns, etc.

Also the medical care system, although operated by the provinces, was set up as a federal-provincial compact with joint funding, so the federal government is a participant and not “meddling”. The provinces and federal government do argue about funding and standards, but that’s a proud Canadian tradition.

 
Comment by Al
2008-06-11 10:29:11

Under the Constitution Act, health care is a provincial responsibility. The Federal Govt introduced the Hospital Insurance and Diagnostic Services Act in 1957 as a power grab, but agreed to cough up 50% to get it (the joint funding part). I suppose meddling isn’t the best word, but either way the Feds bought their way into a provincial matter.

 
 
Comment by Dani W
2008-06-11 09:15:51

No, Canada has socialized insurance.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 09:20:17

“No, Canada has socialized insurance.”

Excellent idiom Dani. Isn’t it interesting that the entire idea of insurance is to socialize the risk.

 
 
 
Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 06:03:30

Who is proposing “socialized healthcare”? Not one candidate has suggested that the Fed Govt. buy up hospitals, clinics and that doctors, nurses, specialists and support staff get put on federal payroll.

 
Comment by edhopper
2008-06-11 06:37:04

Who wants Universal Health Care?
Apparently, most Americans.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/01/opinion/polls/main2528357.shtml

Comment by In Colorado
2008-06-11 07:08:09

And wait for Corporate America to tell its employees that it won’t be providing them health insurance anymore (in order to remain “competitive”).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by yogurt
2008-06-11 08:06:14

This is in fact the reason why the government medical care system in Canada is supported by all political parties. Big Business likes it. They can hire solely on talent and not have to worry about the medical risks of their employees. Small business likes it a lot too, because they would have the most trouble getting insurance for their employees under a private system.

 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-06-11 10:05:57

Big Business likes it. They can hire solely on talent and not have to worry about the medical risks of their employees. Small business likes it a lot too, because they would have the most trouble getting insurance for their employees under a private system.

I keep wondering when non-healthcare industries in the US are going to figure this out for themselves.

I think the auto industry, with its untenable pension and healthcare obligations, already has — but it may be too late for them. In general, however, we have yet to see a eureka moment in the US business community regarding the practicality of healthcare reform.

Once Big Business embraces the idea en masse, no amount of Conservative Booga Booga The Sky Is Falling Red Scare Doublespeak will stop the push for serious healthcare reform. (It remains to be seen just how effective and well-designed those reforms will be, of course.)

 
Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 10:23:20

“no amount of Conservative Booga Booga The Sky Is Falling Red Scare Doublespeak will stop the push for serious healthcare reform.”

Too funny but true. I’m always amazed at the warped (il)logic of that crowd.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-06-11 10:58:45

I keep wondering when non-healthcare industries in the US are going to figure this out for themselves.

From what I am hearing, they have. And they have figured out that they need not lobby for heathcare reform. All they have to do is stop providing the insurance as a bennie and the reform will happen by itself.

 
 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-06-11 08:03:42

If you poll most Americans, they want free legal services, no taxes, cheap gas and cheap housing. But no one is proposing any of those things.

Last time I read the Constitution, there was no “right” to free health care.

To nationalize all health care would be to ruin it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 08:09:34

“To nationalize all health care would be to ruin it.”

I agree except the fact that it’s already broken. I say no to nationalization and socialized health care.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-06-11 11:02:07

The only thing that will get ruined are big pharma’s profits.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-06-11 11:03:58

Last time I read the Constitution, there was no “right” to free health care.

Holy Strawman Argument Batman!

 
Comment by Bill in Maryland
2008-06-11 17:34:44

That’s not a strawman. You are copping out. You want socialized health care, move to a country that offers it. In America we were supposed to be responsible for our own actions and decisions, the alternative is for wimps. Folks that want socialized health care are moving us more along the road to serfdom.

 
 
 
Comment by lostcontrol
2008-06-11 06:44:06

Sorry, if a repeat…

cynicalgirl,
Are you aware that as a general rule, for prvate insurance companies to make a profit and cover their costs, there claims payouts generally do not exceed 66%? If I recall, Medcare runs a costs ratio of less than 5% with zero profits. Further, the only way that private carriers can offer lower costs than govt. insurer is by cherry picking the healthest customers from the general population. So those individuals who can afford the coverage statistically do not need the insurance.

So who do you think is the most cost efficient?

Comment by bluprint
2008-06-11 07:03:01

Maybe the whole universal health care thing is a great idea. But shouldn’t Congress demonstrate an ability to run things efficiently before taking on such a complex issue?

Perhaps they should start with running a successful lemonade stand or something.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by edhopper
2008-06-11 07:12:52

They have. It’s called Medicare, and until George Boy took over, the VA system was very good. As lostcontrol points out, Medicare is much more efficient that private health care. And it covers a group with more health needs than the general pop.
Again, most Americans want Universal Health Care. Another thing the MSM hasn’t caught on to. Just as most Americans don’t give a damn about cap gains tax. But the Media will make this a big issue, since it helps McCain.

 
Comment by tresho
2008-06-11 09:34:15

until George Boy took over, the VA system was very good Not according to many of the vets I have spoken to. The VA system is & has been better than nothing.

 
 
Comment by cynicalgirl
2008-06-11 07:45:12

Europeans pay half as much as we do under “socialized medicine”. And they live longer. That’s the bottom line.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by BanteringBear
2008-06-11 12:26:03

I wonder if they have as many people with @sses the size of refrigerators…

 
Comment by hllnwlz
2008-06-11 12:57:54

Correlation, not causation, CG.

 
 
 
Comment by Skip
2008-06-11 08:14:08

Who wants “socialized health care”? It’s my understanding that both candidates plans involve insurance companies. Socialized health care is when the government pays the doctors and there is no billing or insurance.

My understanding is that regardless of which candidate wins, he will receive socialized health care. Actually, the loser will also receive socialized heath care.

I have yet to hear anyone in the legislative, judicial, or executive branch of government complain about the socialized health care that they receive.

I have heard plenty of the politicians in Washington claim that Americans citizens would be much better off if they did not receive the same medical care the politicians and their families receive.

Do as I say - not as I do the politicians shout from Capitol Hill.

Somehow, people have been hoodwinked into the belief that government run health care can never be a good idea.

Comment by tresho
2008-06-11 09:37:04

people have been hoodwinked into the belief that government run health care can never be a good idea. If I were only allowed to write the laws and appropriate the money to benefit me directly!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2008-06-11 10:13:28

Excuse my “reply” post status. I watched the Documentary “Sick Around The World” and learned about 5 other countries and how they work their universal healthcare (Canada not covered), and it educated me on the pros and cons. Our system is broken. We rank 37th in healthcare in the world.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sickaroundtheworld/

 
 
Comment by Skroodle
2008-06-11 10:39:43

Yeah, but I think you run the risk of them replacing your heart with mechanical one that needs to be oiled, or your brain with that of a scarecrows.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by bluprint
2008-06-11 06:02:23

lol. Didn’t you know? They can’t run the simple things but are the only one’s capable of running the really complex things. Just ask the ra ra squad. Go team!

18M/yr? Jeez. Where’s Gordan Ramsey? They should be on that Ramsey’s Nightmare’s show.

 
Comment by bluprint
2008-06-11 06:04:38

Hey, here’s an idea. Maybe the Senate shouldn’t be allowed to do ANYTHING else until they can successfully run something simple, like a restaraunt. lmao.

Comment by Mole Man
2008-06-11 10:18:25

You missed the point. They shouldn’t be running restaurants.

Using a housing bubble blog to take the health insurance issue on might be reaching. US health care costs roughly double what it does elsewhere, the results are poorer health than other places, emergency rooms are jammed and shutting down, health problems are the primary cause of bankruptcy, and health care burdens on business are having are dampening the economy. Many of those insisting something needs to be done are from the corporate world which has strong ties to both parties and candidates. Insisting on stasis now is really a withdrawl from the dialogue that will shape future health care policy. That employers got stuck with the bill back in the 1930s is just a quirk of history that can’t be made to last, and has essentially already fallen apart.

 
 
 
Comment by Jwhite
Comment by kckid
2008-06-11 05:25:14

State and Federal Treasuries “Profit” More from Gasoline Sales than U.S. Oil Industry

http://www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/1139.html

High gas prices and strong oil company earnings have generated a rash of new tax proposals in recent months. Some lawmakers have called for new “windfall profits” taxes—similar to the one signed into federal law in 1980 by President Jimmy Carter—that would tax the profits of major oil companies at a rate of 50 percent. Meanwhile, many commentators have voiced support for the idea of increasing gas taxes to keep the price of gasoline at post-Katrina highs, thereby reducing gas consumption.

However, often ignored in this debate is the fact that oil industry profits are highly cyclical, making them just as prone to “busts” as to “booms.” Additionally, tax collections on the production and import of gasoline by state and federal governments are already near historic highs. In fact, in recent decades governments have collected far more revenue from gasoline taxes than the largest U.S. oil companies have collectively earned in domestic profits.

Comment by BubbleViewer
2008-06-11 05:37:02

Exactly. Thank you for bringing up this point. It’s very important.
BTW, $9 per gallon gasoline has not “killed” demand in UK, Norway, Sweden, and many other European countries.

Comment by Michael Fink
2008-06-11 05:55:36

Remember that those countries are much smaller then the US, and therefore, I would assume, far fewer miles driven (and NOT IN a dam* Escalade) and much less gas burned per capita.

However, I do agree with your thesis; I think the real break point for gas is around 10/gal. At that price, things will really start to change. Anything under that will just hurt the middle and lower middle class, causing them to cut back on consumption of other items.

Those in the upper-middle/upper class are not affected by the gas prices. And anyone who thinks they are “upper-middle” class and is hurting because of the price of gas; let me be the first to tell you, you’re not “upper-middle” class. My total gas expense (driving close to 60K miles a year, with 2 cars), is ~$10,000 this year (assuming we avg the year around 4.75 per gal of premium).. Let’s see, compared to the other costs for the “upper middle” class lifestyle in my area (Palm Beach), 10K is peanuts. The taxes on the house I live in are 12K a year. The insurance is 6K. The cars themselves are expensive, I am sure that with a loan figured in, they would cost at least 10K a year EACH to own.

And guess what? Even if gas falls by 1/2, I am still going to be spending 5K a year on it. Would I be happy? Sure, that’s 5K I don’t have now!! :) However, does it really impact my lifestyle? Not at all, it’s an insignificant number compared to the other costs of an “upper-middle” class lifestyle in this area.

Please don’t take any of this to be condescending; that’s not the point at all. I understand that some people are really hurting over the gas prices, and I do feel for them, and hope that gas falls to make it more affordable to everyone again! However, my point is mostly that when I walk through my community of 1M dollar homes (well, that’s what they sold for at one point!) and hear people getting really worried about gas prices, I just have to laugh. You should be making ~350K to buy that 1M dollar home. You’re telling me that an extra few thousand bucks a year is throwing your whole budget off? Come on!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by txchick57
2008-06-11 06:02:44

Yes, I made that same point a month or so ago. If gas were $10 a gallon, it would annoy me but wouldn’t change anything I do. If that small amount throws you off, you need to take a look at what you’re spending money on.

And yes, I know that would also make food prices go up.

 
Comment by yogurt
2008-06-11 06:45:29

Remember that those countries are much smaller then the US, and therefore, I would assume, far fewer miles driven

It has nothing to do with the size of the country. Americans don’t do all that driving between metropolitan areas, but within them. Isn’t that obvious really? Also the US states where most people live, like California or New Jersey, are just as densely populated as many European countries.

I will also point out that the UK has among the most miles driven per capita of any European country, but is one of the most densely populated. It has nothing to do with density and everything to do with the availability of quality public transit and proper urban planning.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-06-11 07:13:14

far fewer miles driven (and NOT IN a dam* Escalade)

When I envision school textbooks 20 years from now I imagine that they will have pictures of Escalades and Hummers in the section about the great fuel crisis of 2009.

 
Comment by nhz
2008-06-11 07:20:59

and increased driving in the UK has a lot to do with the UK housing bubble, where many simple workers are forced to drive 2 hours to work because closer to their work ALL homes are totally unaffordable. This is a very common theme in all the British home-buying shows on TV. Dismantling of the good public transport system by former ‘free market’ UK governments have made things even worse.

 
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2008-06-11 11:27:59

You got it! When I lived there in the UK, I was always living reasonably close to work (i.e. 5 or 6 miles, which can be as long as 1 hour in London peak hour!), but I had friends who wanted to own their own houses, and they lived waaaaaaaaay out. Some were 25 miles, some were over 50 miles away, like living in Wiltshire and working in London — madness!

Petrol costs were hurting them alive at 85p/litre; it has to be really bad now. But they just shifted their budgets to make room for the transportation costs. To them, it was worth it because of the lower housing costs out in the boondocks (such as “boondocks” are in a crowded place like England).

 
 
Comment by Xiaoding
2008-06-11 05:57:20

When your whole “country” is the size of freakin’ Connecticut, (and stuffed with mass transit) of course not!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by nhz
2008-06-11 06:10:00

I just watched another news item about this in Netherlands (where gas is $10 now). Car drivers are very angry with the government because of the high energy taxes and are demanding lower taxes. But they are not going to drive a mile less, and this opinioin was by far the clearest from the people that drive big expensive SUV’s. They are pissed but they will drive exactly the same even if gas is $25 - hey, they can afford it! Transport companies, fishermen, farmers, you name it - they are all demanding huge energy subsidies from the government and without a doubt some of them will get it.

Keep in mind that although gas at the pump is expensive in Europe, the price runup by % is far smaller than in the US because of all the taxes (maybe 20% up over the last few years).

There is a shift to smaller, more efficient cars here but it is mostly lower wage workers and people driving a company (lease) car who are forced to make this choice. In my relatively wealthy innercity neighborhood (lots of wellpaid government workers) posh SUV’s (X5, Touareg, Cayenne, big Volvo’s etc.) are still multiplying like rabbits. The purchase tax on some of these dinosaurs went up nearly 10K euro earlier this year and car dealers are complaining loudly about that, but the government is also cutting some taxes that primarily hit expensive cars.

I think we need far higher oil prices to really kill demand.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2008-06-11 07:20:32

How much are these guys paid?

 
Comment by nhz
2008-06-11 10:40:20

How much are these guys paid?

the gov workers that drive the big SUV’s? When they have been working for local gov. for 10-20 years and have a slightly above average job level, they make between 4000 and 10000 euros a month before taxes (1.5-4x median wage). Keep in mind that because of special taxes, Dutch price for these SUV’s is twice the US price…

But wages is only part of the story. Many of these workers probably own a city home that they purchased for 50-75K euros in 1980-1990, and which is now worth 500-1000K euros (with all gains tax free). With the average Dutch homeprice increase, people got a free SUV every few years …That is were most of this wealth on display is probably coming from. Sounds familiar?

If the Dutch housingbubble pops, walking or cycling in the city streets will be a much more pleasant experience than it is now :)

 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-06-11 11:07:25

Glad to hear that its not just us with the HELOCs.

My income is definitely in that range, and I can’t afford those kind of cars, even though they are cheaper in the US.

 
 
Comment by measton
2008-06-11 07:01:01

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/06/11/npetrol111.xml

Petrol retailers have disclosed that fuel sales dropped sharply over the past few weeks and the latest figures appear to show that demand for petrol in Britain has slumped by as much as 20 per cent over the past 12 months

They already used much less than the average American.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by measton
2008-06-11 07:09:06

Gas demand in the UK dropped 20% last month.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money

Consumption in industrialized nations belonging to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, like Japan, Germany, Britain and the United States, is now expected to fall by 240,000 barrels a day in 2008, the Energy Department said. Last month, it had forecast that consumption would be unchanged from last yea

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2008-06-11 08:13:59

Methinks that Chindia and other nations will more than make up for that reduction in consumption, many times over.

 
Comment by measton
2008-06-11 09:12:53

PENANG - Malaysians are reeling from a 41% rise in petrol prices and a 63% hike in diesel as Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi’s administration scrambles to ward off public discontent over his unpopular policy decision to remove fuel price subsidies

Violence erupted in Iran last week when Ahmadinejad’s government imposed gasoline rationing, limiting drivers to 100 litres (26.39 gallons) per month of petrol at the subsidized price of about $0.42 per gallon.

China announced that domestic price increases might be inevitable later this year in response to world markets — an acknowledgment that might prompt further fuel hoarding in China.

“Prices of crude oil, grains and other primary products are still rising on the international market, and China faces relatively large pressures of further price increases,” the announcement on the government Web site said.

June 2006
ndia, which imports 70 percent of its oil, increased prices for gasoline by 11 percent, diesel by 9 percent and cooking gas by 17 percent after oil reached a record $135.09 a barrel in New York on May 22. India previously raised fuel prices in February, the first time since June 2006.

Eventually consumption will fall in these countries as well.

 
Comment by tresho
2008-06-11 09:41:21

Hey, screw “windfall profits tax”! I’ll vote for any candidate who promises to make all the gas I want available at my local pump for $1/gal.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-06-11 11:10:46

Eventually consumption will fall in these countries as well.

Perhaps at a per car level, but they are adding millions of new cars to their fleets every year. Aggregate demand will continue to rise.

 
 
Comment by BW
2008-06-11 08:23:44

On average the people in those countries are in less debt than Americans. Good Morning America just did a bit called “Credit Card Nation”. Profiled a couple who are in $70k of debt on ~15 credit cards and a college senior who has ~$22k cc debt as well. Some financial analyst came on to point out that American consumer debt far outstrips that found in nearly every European country. Of course people are gonna be on the rocks when the price of gas goes up.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2008-06-11 11:39:36

There are several other countries that are rivalling us, evevn exceeding us, and this is not even a new thing:

From the BBC back in 2004:

“Seven years ago UK households held as much debt as they were earning. Now outstanding debt stands at 135% of household income. “

From the Reserve Bank of Australia back in 2003:

“The household debt to income ratio has risen from 56 per cent to 125 per cent over the decade to end 2002.”

For some info from 2003 but very complete, check out this link and see the charts:
An International Comparison of Household Debt
(Warning for those who care - it’s a PDF)

That’s not to say that we don’t have a household debt problem. We do, and it’s bad.

 
Comment by nhz
2008-06-11 13:27:29

Nova Sideliner:

I can add that in the Netherlands outstanding debt is a lot higher than in the US and UK, more than 200% of household earnings (’but’ as they always say here, ‘that is no problem at all’ because we have the most generous HMD in the world. Dutchies can service more mortgage debt than anyone, at least until the housingbubble pops or the tax office decides that homeowners have to start paying some income taxes just like other citizens).

 
 
Comment by Arwen_U
2008-06-11 17:13:21

BTW, $9 per gallon gasoline has not “killed” demand in UK, Norway, Sweden, and many other European countries.

Except in Spain, where two truckers were killed today amidst mass fuel strikes. Google Fuel Protests.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Jwhite
 
Comment by kckid
2008-06-11 05:17:06

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/06/10/activists-preparing-against-use-of-brown-note-at-dem-convention/

Political activists planning protest rallies at the upcoming Democratic Convention in Denver have their stomachs in knots over a rumor about a crowd control weapon - known as the “crap cannon” - that might be unleashed against them.

Also called “Brown Note,” it is believed to be an infrasound frequency that debilitates a person by making them defecate involuntarily.

This sounds like a bunch of crap to me.

Comment by SFC
2008-06-11 05:54:59

This will be very confusing - how will they tell the difference between these piles of c**p, and Howard Dean?

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-06-11 05:58:29

hahahahah! That is funny!

speaking of what’s in your shorts, I think it’s time to cover them for the “summer rally”.

Comment by Michael Fink
2008-06-11 06:30:38

TX is always “sneaking” these into the comments section. It would make me very happy if we had a place to just go and discuss stocks, so I wouldn’t have to read every single comment to find the one where TX gives us her wisdom on the market.

Oh, who am I kidding, I read every comment anyway. :)

So, you think the rally is on the way again? I can’t believe how hard the market fell apart (probably because it’s on such shaky footing!) over the past few weeks. It’s amazing, and I am sure some of it is over reaction. Hopefully the summer rally has some legs; and then we can all get short again after it fizzles out.

Comment by GrittyToasterWaffleGuy
2008-06-11 07:12:18

I completely agree. I was on the fence about staying short — had SDS and QID calls floating since end of May and a few deep in the money SKF calls since mid April (that finally got back to green last week). I took a few off the table halfway through the plunge. Today was about her third warning to watch for the counter rally. I’m only sort of stupid, so I don’t usually have to be told more than thrice. LOL. Bird in hand, yadda yadda yadda.

BTW, QID calls are something I’m not going to do again no matter how sure I am that a Nasdaq short is a good play. Made out reasonably well on them, but damn are they sparsely traded. I don’t need anything close to that kind of aggravation when it’s time to exit.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by GrittyToasterWaffleGuy
2008-06-11 07:13:57

Of course, I’ll note that since I covered all of my remaining shorts this morning, the probability of a catastrophic market plunge in the next 4-5 hours just went up substantially.

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-06-11 07:20:19

75% long via index calls. Short dated though, doubt any rally will last very long.

 
Comment by txchick57
2008-06-11 07:22:07

Waffle Dude: I like shorting the Nasdaq too and it always performs ;) But once this sucker bottoms (which could be a year from now, who knows) that will be the place to buy and hold IMO.

 
Comment by Michael Fink
2008-06-11 07:22:14

Oh crap. Thanks for telling me before the Dow was down 150 points today! Would have been nice to let some of the rest of us exit our longs before you started the catastrophic plunge!!

:)

 
Comment by GrittyToasterWaffleGuy
2008-06-11 07:29:39

Yeah, the Nasdaq short was a quick play. I’ve been long AAPL since last year. Held all the way down and then all the way back up. Been making a nice monthly “dividend” by writing out of the money calls since December ($190 for June). April almost bit me in the ass, though. Apple fanboy/fangirl irrational exuberance can be both fun and profitable.

 
Comment by GrittyToasterWaffleGuy
2008-06-11 09:52:40

“75% long via index calls. Short dated though, doubt any rally will last very long”

I lack the intestinal fortitude to play that kind of leverage in the dark on the side of a cliff. Rolled big into SSO in stages in the high 67s (about equal to 1341 on the S&P). Very tight stop in place.

 
Comment by cactus
2008-06-11 12:43:09

Summer rally ?

 
 
 
 
Comment by Rally
2008-06-11 07:31:51

“Also called “Brown Note,” it is believed to be an infrasound frequency that debilitates a person by making them defecate involuntarily.”

Wonderful. News stories based on reruns of South Park. I am enjoying the collapse of our society.

Comment by GrittyToasterWaffleGuy
2008-06-11 07:52:03

Dammit!! I HATE you guys.

/Cartman

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-06-11 09:23:50

I am enjoying the collapse of our society.

Society seems have kept on collapsing since time immemorial. However, it seems to bravely soldier on somehow.

Go back to your cave, Old Man Dingleberry™.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
 
Comment by tresho
2008-06-11 09:47:49

Future street demonstrators intent on their mission will simply have to wear Depends. Instead of throwing tear gas canisters back at the police, the true believers will fling their own dung. Gives a whole new meaning to –
“The Movement”!

Comment by In Colorado
2008-06-11 11:14:27

Or purge their bowels the night before!

 
 
 
Comment by Jwhite
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-06-11 06:21:34

Imagine being Mrs. Perez and proudly showing the article in which you are quoted to your friends and family:

Of course, the plight of retailers is little consolation for drivers.

Mayra Perez, who works two fast-food jobs to help support her family, suggested that the government should step in to help ease the burden, possibly by placing price limits on gasoline.

This comes right after several pages of gasoline pricing info and several paragraphs showing that 96% of retailers are deciding how much money to lose on gasoline sales if they can’t raise it $0.04.

Somehow I don’t think anyone Mayra shows the article to is going to come right out and say: Mayra, this makes you look like an idiot!

Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2008-06-11 11:48:53

Gasoline price controls? OMFG. Hello, gas lines. Every time the government(s) hit producers and retailers with price controls, it ends up restricting supply.

Those producers who, via efficiency or advance hedging, can make it for less will sell it for the posted price. Those producers who would lose money on it will slow production to a crawl. Same general result, be here or Venezuela.

Ah yes, I so do miss the gas lines of the 1970’s! The quiet relaxation in line, the camaraderie, ah the good old days…

 
 
 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-06-11 05:43:14

We’re at the point where even street vendors can’t stand competition and demand protection.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601093&sid=a4YRMmT8Xg4M&refer=home

Comment by WT Economist
2008-06-11 06:16:58

Hey, the Halal food folks are wiping the floor with those lousy hot dogs and soggy Knishes in NYC. The only thing left that’s edible in Midtown at $4.00 or less.

I hope that kind of protectionism doesn’t move here. I think I’ll to out for a combination lamb/chicken pita today.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-06-11 08:13:21

Yeah, like the Bangladeshi-Canadian dude who quit his sous-chef job at the Russian Tea Room, and opened a cart in Midtown.

He is cleaning up, and the cart even has a Zagat’s rating!!! :-D

 
 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-06-11 08:24:18

The lack of street food in Chicago is a sore spot for me.

One of the many things NYC does well is street food. It’s pretty great to be able to get kosher, halal, veg options downtown during lunch hour.

 
 
Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 05:44:19

Talked with koolade inebriated RE believer relatives back home in VT and extreme upstate NY along VT border. There was a sense of vindication in their talk. They believe the worst is over and it’s happy days are here again. Their assertions are based on a pick up in sales over the last 45 days and rent prices going up. I did some quick research and was very perturbed that asking rents *are* up there. Waaaay up. Quadrupled many cases. I saw apartments going for $1400/month and can only wonder who in the hell can afford that given the underemployment/unemployment and low local wages. It all gave me that same sick stomach I felt as I shook my head in disbelief back in 04-05 when I observed 100year old pieces of shit selling at 4x year 200 prices. Good grief.

Comment by Blano
2008-06-11 06:36:55

Maybe they saw that Yahoo article or wherever it was that showed 3 of the top 10 current RE markets in upstate New York (Syracuse, Rochester, Buffalo).

Comment by WT Economist
2008-06-11 07:21:49

Ha — these are the three hottest real estate markets?

Do you know how cheap housing is in those markets? The prices are next to ZERO — less than $100K for the median sales price. Low enough that a married couple with two full-time, minimum wage jobs can purchase an entry-level house WITH TRADITIONAL LOANS.

Upstate New York — so far down it’s can’t go down farther without being abandoned.

Comment by Blano
2008-06-11 07:57:49

So can a single mom with a decent full time job (the reason for my Rochester visits).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-06-11 08:31:17

“Upstate New York — so far down it’s can’t go down farther without being abandoned.”

Ahhh….come clean, WT. You just bought this hillside estate overlooking the lake and hope to shut the proverbial door behind you.

http://www.realtor.com/search/listingdetail.aspx?zp=13035&typ=1&sid=2977de1d951e44efb5fc14212a671b49&pg=10&lid=1098039734&lsn=94&srcnt=95#Detail

After all, its a nice walk to that historic village everyone loves & right down the street from this “Sprawling residence, once the home of a Russian Czarist princess.”

http://syracuse.craigslist.org/apa/711627718.html

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Ostriches
2008-06-11 08:40:19

Yeah imagine that, regular hardworking people being able to afford a home for “next to Zero.” It just has to be a horrible, miserable place to live!

Stupid me, I guess living in an overpriced city, paying $1-2 million for a comparable home that I could get for “next to Zero” in Upstate, and not ever being able to attain a similar quality of life (because of the housing bubble) is somehow better.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by spike66
2008-06-11 07:25:46

I saw that list, and the median price for Buffalo was about 105K or so. That’s an old-fashioned town with very limited rentals. There are
some high-end rentals along the waterfront, and some really beautiful old preWW1 rental buildings, and some newer townhouse rentals out in the burbs,but there isn’t much. It’s also a town with limited mobility…I grew up there, and a majority of people I went to high school with did not leave. SFH rentals tend to be section 8s, in broken down neighborhoods.
It just doesn’t have much in common with the rest of the country.

Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 08:00:32

Those cities, Buffalo and Rottenchester in particular have more in common with cities in rust belt state than with anything east of them. IMHO.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-06-11 08:33:12

They’re very Rust Belt towns, they just happen to be located in the exurbs of the Rust Belt.

It’s also a town with limited mobility…I grew up there, and a majority of people I went to high school with did not leave.

Another common element with the Rust Belt.

I like both Buffalo and Rochester (and Cleveland, Detroit, Dayton, etc.), but it’s hard for me to imagine making a decent living and raising a family in towns like that.

 
 
Comment by Halifax
2008-06-11 11:36:43

You grew up in Buffalo? Where did you go to high school?
(I went to Park School, and no I wasn’t one of the rich kids who got kicked out of Nichols. Went to P.S. 68 back in the day).

My dad still has a bunch of rentals in north Buffalo. Mom can’t stand the whole landlord/tenant thing (if you die first, it’s be ‘Buy one, get one free’) - Who flushed the hambone down the toilet? Wasn’t me, I’m Jewish, I’m Muslim, I’m a vegetarian, etc.

You were absolutely right about the lines from Verlaine’s poem as a signal to the French resistance heralding D-day June 6, 1944.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by spike66
2008-06-11 17:05:24

Halifax,
Lindbergh grade school in Kenmore, then Buffalo Sem. Left for college at 17, though still like the town a lot. Family is still there. My older brother owns a couple of rentals in north Buffalo, those 3 story Victorians with huge porches in the Central Park neighborhood. i don’t know what he thinks about them…he just shrugs.
My godfather went to Canada to join the British forces in 39.
Recruited by British intelligence,he spent the war in France working with the resistance. His French was lousy,but his contacts were Jesuit priests–his Latin was aces (courtesy of Nichols). That poem was handwritten and framed in his living room.

 
Comment by Halifax
2008-06-11 17:29:24

his Latin was aces (courtesy of Nichols)
____________________________________________

Hey! Some of us at Park studied Latin and calculus (believe it or not), and didn’t live like Paris Hilton..

I may have to revise my opinion about Nichols though.

We used to watch Spirogyra at the Central Park Grill for free at open mike before they hit the big time; we folled up and cooked ~500 eggrolls at their last free concert.

Does your godfather still have that handwritten framed poem?
I’ll bid for it on ebay.

 
Comment by spike66
2008-06-11 20:49:20

Halifax,
he died about 12 years ago, I am sure his son has it now. Learned about his WW2 experiences from his obituaries…he himself never said a word, and never explained why he loved that poem. I knew its significance,but not why it was important to him.
ARe you in Nova Scotia? I watch RE there via Tradewinds…the runup has been stunning. What’s happening? How’s the weather now?

 
Comment by Halifax
2008-06-12 08:45:37

Sorry, ‘Halifax’ is named after the town of a former biz partner; am currently living in Alaska, where it’s in the 50’s and a bit cloudy, but beautiful all the same.

Hope is your godfather’s son is taking care of those framed lines from Verlaine - sounds like it was a turning point in your godfather’s life as well as world history.

 
 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-06-11 06:40:59

Exeter, what is the rental inventory like in those towns? Are SFH rentals few and far in between?

Comment by JoeC
2008-06-11 11:23:40

I’ll answer that for Buffalo. I’ve been renting in the suburbs for a year. The inventory here is very thin. Most of the stuff for rent is old and in poor condition and the prices are fairly high for what you can get. When I was looking for a place last year there were a total of 9 houses I could find that sounded acceptable. After I saw them, only 1 seemed decent. Given, the taxes and low incomes here it doesn’t make sense to invest in SFH rentals. Because of the taxes, the rent has to be high and then you have to find someone with the money. The result is low inventory and relatively high prices. BTW, I just got a foreclosure notice on the house that I am renting. Good thing my lease is ending.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-06-11 12:24:04

“BTW, I just got a foreclosure notice on the house that I am renting. Good thing my lease is ending.”

Do you already have something lined up, Joe C?
Or will you be writing the next chapter in the HBB Squatter’s Log? (nod to losty)

If not, good luck.

“the prices are fairly high for what you can get”

I found that in Syr burbs too. When you’re used to living in a well maintained home, with up-to-date and clean environment, signing that lease for the much larger rent payment is done with a huge gulp and a bit of the shakes. But when its that or commuting from the Adirondack camp grounds….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by JoeC
2008-06-11 13:33:45

Yeah, I have something lined up already. Writing a bigger rent check than I like isn’t fun, but it is better than riding a house down 10 or 15% next year. I thought about doing the squatter thing, but if Lost can’t even make it a week what chance do I have?

 
 
 
 
Comment by realestateskeptic
2008-06-11 06:59:55

Were they Summer rental places skewing the VT data? I have a camp/cottage up that way in the ADK’s and the summer rental market is very strong, esp. along Lake Champlain or any other lake. Not sure if people are staying closer to home and not flying, but the Summer tourism season looks good this Summer. The buy/sell market also seems stable. Prices appear stable but the number of transactions is down a bit, but nothing compared to the bubble areas.

Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 07:14:43

“Prices appear stable but the number of transactions is down a bit, but nothing compared to the bubble areas.”

NYSAR’s own data disagrees with that assertion. Depending on the county, sales are down anywhere from 15-40%+ in any county east of the Hudson. I’m not sure how the tourist season can be view optimistically or otherwise. I don’t have a way to view data that would suggest either one. Call those areas what you will but they most certainly qualify as bubble areas in my estimation in consideration of the fact that fantasy prices there are 3x or more over year 2000.

Carrie, I simply looked at rental prices in and around those towns on realtor.com. I was blown away by it.

Comment by realestateskeptic
2008-06-11 09:19:33

Exeter - Thanks - I didn’t know they kept those stats and they are useful. Our camp/cottage town is on the Hudson, not east, the stats, Apr 2006 to 2008 from that site for Warren County show prices up 21.6% and volume down 11.9% so they are consistent what I have been observing. Granted there are not that many sales (52 in 2008 vs 59 in 2006, price went from 185k to 225k) and so the stats could be skewed on price by a few large transactions. I should not have lumped in Lake Champlain with Lake George and the surrounding area.

We occasionally rent our cottage out to overflow requests from 2 small established lakeside summer business. They each have 8-10 cabins and clients who return year after year. Last year we could have booked 3 rentals, this year we had 8 requests. Both owners report many more reservation requests for the upcoming season. Again, I doubt this is statistically significant, but it is a snap shot of our little universe.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 09:32:06

Presuming you’re speaking of Luzerne area, I now understand what you’re saying. That place is a true anomaly…. a conundrum by any description. I know that town like the back of my hand and I’ll say you’re likely correct in your previous assessment. I have NO idea what is sustaining RE in southern Warren and northern Saratoga counties. If you’ve been there a while, you’ll know that prices tripled since 2000, even in light of the fact that IP shut a mill in Corinth dumping 500 employees in 2002. That alone should of put out any potential fire but it didn’t. I can only surmise the NYC/NJ/CT crowd is supporting prices. If you ask a native Luzerne, most will say “they are all millionares in NYC and they all want to live here”.

 
 
 
 
Comment by cactus
 
 
Comment by hoz
2008-06-11 05:49:55

Time for a flashback
Stephen Roach
What Global Saving Glut?
Jul 05, 2005

“…In my view, no one has a bigger stake in dismissing the perils of the Asset Economy than its architect, the Fed. This brings up an alternative explanation to the savings-glut thesis: It hinges on the role of the US central bank. By condoning the equity bubble of the late 1990s, a case can be made that the Fed set in motion a post-bubble defense strategy of extraordinary monetary accommodation that all but insured a steady stream of “echo bubbles” — from bonds and credit to emerging-market debt and property. Given the shortfall of labor income generation evident in this jobless and wageless recovery, US consumers have turned to asset-driven wealth effects as both a supplement to saving and as the principal means to fund the greatest consumption binge in modern history. …”
http://www.morganstanley.com/views/gef/archive/2005/20050705-Tue.html

 
Comment by Tim
2008-06-11 05:56:31

There were some comments in one of yesterday’s threads regarding the role of a Trustee in a securitization relating to who actually owns the mortgage loans and who should be exercising remedies for default. I did not respond because by the time I saw it I doubted many would actually read my response.

For the most part the Trustee is the registered owner of the mortgage loans and is required to distribute the principal and interest received thereon pursuant to the waterfall set forth in the Indenture. A trustee does this for a nominal fee which it deducts from the interest coming in on the mortgage loans before distributing. Unless the Trustee is directed by written direction of the holders of the securities issued by the trust representing interests in the mortgage loans (the documents usually require direction from a certain percentage, usually from the majority holder, a majority of all holders, or 100% of the holders depending on the nature of the action) and provided with indemnification for any costs it incurs therefrom, the Trustee is not obligated nor even permitted to exercise remedies. I can’t imagine the Trustee not ever knowing who the holders are, as they would be in violation of their duties. The real issue is that the Trustee is not obligated, has no interest to act, and cannot act without written direction from the holders accompanied with indemnification. Depending on how many holders there are, and what percentage is required to direct the Trustee to take action, delays or non-action may result as those holding smaller pieces may be more worried about the indemnification aspects than the benefits of exercising remedies, especially if the Trust contains many mortgage loans so that a default on one may not result in substantial defaults with respect to the security it owns.

Comment by realestateskeptic
2008-06-11 07:05:39

Not to mention that the system is so clogged and complicated that it is often very hard to tell who actually owns any given loan….. In our area, many foreclosures have been stopped as the foreclosing Trustee has not been able to prove who actually owns the loan….

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 06:16:36

This sounds to me like a textbook case of the Fed pushing on a string.

COVER STORY: INSIDE BUSINESS
Why It’s Worse Than You Think

For months, economic Pollyannas have looked beyond the dismal headlines and promised a quick recovery in the second half. They’re dead wrong.

By Daniel Gross | NEWSWEEK
Jun 16, 2008 Issue

The forgettable first half of 2008 is stumbling to a close. On Friday, the Labor Department reported that American employers axed 49,000 jobs in May, the fifth straight month of job losses—an event that signals a recession sure as the glittery ball dropping on Times Square augurs a New Year. The report, which inspired a 394-point decline in the Dow Jones Industrial Average Friday, was the latest in a run of bad news. Auto sales, the largest retailing sector in the U.S., were off 10.7 percent in May from the year before. And housing? Ugh. Nationwide, according to the Case-Shiller Index, home prices in the first quarter fell 14 percent.

Yet hope springs eternal that the second half will be better than the first. Economists polled by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia in May believe the economy will grow at an annual rate of 1.7 percent and 1.8 percent in the third and fourth quarters, respectively. Lawrence Yun, chief economist at the National Association of Realtors, tells NEWSWEEK that “home sales and prices in most of the country will improve during the second half of 2008.” (Yun is the Little Orphan Annie of forecasters. He’s always sure the sun will come out tomorrow.) Last month, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said, “We expect to see a faster pace of economic growth before the end of the year.”

The cause for optimism: the U.S. has called in the economic cavalry, which has responded in textbook fashion. The Federal Reserve has aggressively cut interest rates, bringing the Federal Funds rate down from 5.25 percent last September to 2 percent. Earlier this spring, Congress and President Bush, in a rare moment of bipartisan accord, passed a stimulus package, which will shove nearly $100 billion into the pockets of American consumers by mid-July.

But this downturn is likely to last longer than the eight-month-long recession of 2001. While the U.S. financial system processes popped stock bubbles quickly, it has always taken longer to hack through the overhang of bad debt. The head winds that drove the economy into this dead calm— a housing and credit crisis, and rising energy and food prices—have strengthened rather than let up in recent months. To aggravate matters, the twin crises that dominate the financial news—a credit crunch and the global commodity boom—are blunting the stimulus efforts. As a result, the consumer-driven economy may not bounce back as rapidly as it did in the fraught months after 9/11.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 07:22:57

Based on the fact that Newsweek is openly mocking them, the serial bottom caller brigade has lost all credibility at this point.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-06-11 09:00:36

John Mauldin also showing why this downturn is going to take a while in one of his recent e-letters:

What the Tax Numbers Show

“From Goldman Sachs: “We estimate that the US government ran a budget deficit of $160 billion in May, about $92bn wider than in May 2007. Most of this reflects tax rebates (about $50bn) and calendar effects (about $27bn). The remaining $15bn is true deterioration, reflecting reduced tax revenue growth as the economy stagnates. In particular, withholding of income and payroll taxes was flat and corporate payments (usually tiny in May) fell.”

In short, wherever you look, tax receipts are down. That means income and sales are down. There is no spin that trumps tax receipts. And Phillippa (Dunne , co-author of The Liscio Report) told me that her sources at the various states she surveys are not optimistic about a real recovery in the latter half of the year.

I would not want to own any stock whose earnings are tied to the US consumer. Between rising input prices and falling sales, earnings are going to be squeezed. Today’s almost 400-point drop in the Dow is just a precursor to the direction of the market, until consumer spending starts to recover. This time, there will not be large mortgage equity withdrawals to bail out the economy. We will see a slow growth/no growth Muddle Through Economy for at least another 12 months.”

John Mauldin, Best-Selling author and recognized financial expert, is also editor of the free Thoughts From the Frontline that goes to over 1 million readers each week. For more information on John or his FREE weekly economic letter go to: http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/learnmore

 
Comment by sf jack
2008-06-11 09:17:12

Interestingly, even the local sportscasters now see a difficult environment ahead.

This morning one of them was recounting how… “as a sign of the current economic times”… only 26,000 showed up in Oakland last night to watch the Yankees and A’s.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2008-06-11 10:21:59

Could it be that a night at the ballgame has gotten too expensive for most of us?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blano
2008-06-11 11:11:54

The Red Wings didn’t sell out ’til it got to playoff time. But they thought it was a marketing problem.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-06-11 11:29:04

Our local minor league hockey team has sold out every game for the past few years. Of course it helps that they are a strong team and that tix are only $18.

 
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2008-06-11 11:57:50

Too expensive? I’ll say!

Last time I was out with the family, it all added up to over $70 for three of us, and that was for a minor (Carolina) league game! I don’t even want to think what it would cost me to spend the evening at a Nationals game.

 
 
 
Comment by diogenes (Tampa)
2008-06-11 11:56:01

I consider “Newsweek”, along with WSJ, Time and other propagandist rags to be counter trend callers.
Based on this article, I am more inclined to believe we will be in a full bull run by September.

the recent action has been split and the volumes don’t show real sincerity. I’ll have to see how today and tomorrow play out, but I am slowly moving back “IN”, not out of this loser market.

 
 
 
Comment by hoz
2008-06-11 06:17:38

Regulation model has failed, says Merkel

By Lionel Barber, Bertrand Benoit and Hugh Williamson in,Berlin

Published: June 11 2008 03:00 | Last updated: June 11 2008 03:00

“…Compared to industry, where people have a deep understanding of the products they deal with, financial markets are a lot more opaque. That has to change so that a country like Germany, which still produces a lot of industrial goods, does not have to carry the economic risks.”

Ms Merkel also indirectly criticised Josef Ackermann, the Deutsche Bank chief executive, who said he no longer believed in the “self-healing force of the market”. She warned that the backlash against the banks must not be hijacked by opponents of free trade: “We should not give protectionism an open flank.”

The chancellor praised the euro as having allowed the economy of the EU to partially decouple from the US, at least in the industrial goods area if not in financial markets, and reaffirmed her support for the independence of the European Central Bank.

“If we decide to subject the actions of the ECB to political contingencies, there will always be one or several countries with good grounds to influence the ECB. I say beware: we need crystal-clear principles or we will shake confidence in the euro.”

Unlike President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, she played down the economic risks to the eurozone of the currency’s rapid appreciation against the dollar, saying that it had partially cushioned the increase in oil and raw material prices.”
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8d9c4548-3750-11dd-bc1c-0000779fd2ac.html

 
Comment by sevenofnine
2008-06-11 06:17:46

For This Broker, Foreclosure Spells Boom:

http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/11/news/economy/mcilvaine/index.htm?postversion=2008061107

“But, he warns, potential buyers shouldn’t expect foreclosed properties to sell at a hefty discount. In fact, he now sees the same bidding wars on REO homes that he used to see on traditional properties.

“The mere word foreclosure elicits a sense of “deal,” McIlvaine said. “But banks are not giving it away.”

Comment by Arizona Slim
2008-06-11 11:54:44

Well, if that means that the banks have astronomical wishing prices, then their oh-so-special foreclosed properties are going to sit there. Just like they are on the resale market.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 06:20:05

This should make it harder for Megabank, Inc’s short-term borrowing cost anomalies to unduly influence the LIBOR.

U.K. Bankers to Alter Libor To Address Rate Doubts
By Carrick Mollenkamp
Word Count: 831

LONDON — After insisting for months that there were no problems with its benchmark interest rate, the British Bankers’ Association said Tuesday that it will address concerns about the London interbank offered rate’s accuracy by increasing the number of banks that report their borrowing costs to calculate the Libor every weekday morning in London.

The BBA also aims to better police the rates banks contribute, and will consider establishing new rates to reflect differences in borrowing costs for European and U.S. banks.

Comment by nhz
2008-06-11 07:15:47

I predict BBA will make no substantial changes, just like after previous criticism. The UK/EU banks love the way they can game this market, so there is zero chance they are going to make changes that adjust LIBOR to real market rates.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 06:21:45

Now that the inflation genie is out of the bottle…

Banker Brawl: The Toughest On Inflation
By Mark Gongloff
Word Count: 506

They may not look like brawlers, but Ben Bernanke and Jean-Claude Trichet lately have bystanders ducking to avoid collateral damage.

By choice or accident, the central bankers seem to be in a contest to see who can talk toughest about inflation. Both have convinced markets they’ll raise rates before the year is out. Some rates are moving higher in anticipation, potentially throwing another sack of bricks on the already shaky global economy and financial markets.

Comment by ozajh
2008-06-11 07:43:32

Have a look at what the respective “brawlers” have DONE, in contrast to what they’ve SAID.

While perhaps not in Paul Volcker’s class, Trichet has stared down National Presidents (Italy, France) and refused to lower rates at their bidding. Only a US publication would suggest there is any actual comparison between he and Bendover Bernanke in the field of inflation fighting.

Comment by Mole Man
2008-06-11 10:25:11

Paul Volcker has differences with Ben Bernanke, but he has also stated that this is a difficult balance. Just raising interest rates at this time could slam the economy hard. This period of low interest rates is helping to keep the economy from collapsing while providing a window where some of this mountain of toxic debt can be transferred into realistic fixed rate products. It is easy for bloggers to talk tough when they have no skin in the game and only desire the correction to be as fast and as sharp as possible which is something that has been demonstrated to maximize the long term disruption to the economy and labor markets specifically.

 
Comment by realestateskeptic
2008-06-11 11:37:33

Not sticking up for BB, but the Fed mandate is to try to balance growth and inflation while our EU Central Bank friends have a single mandate, to control inflation. Seems to me its a lot easier to say “NO’ when that is your only mandate.

Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2008-06-11 13:48:00

To be precise, the Fed’s goals (per a 1977 act of congresscritters) is (1) to promote maximum sustainable output and employment, and (2) to promote stable prices (i.e. keep inflation controlled).

hence, the Fed does have a trickier job than the ECB, perhaps an impossible job if they work themselves into a corner like they’ve done now.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2008-06-11 13:49:48

Oh, and forgot to add my agreement that yes, it is indeed easier for people like Trichet, with his single mandate, to say no to politicians who want monetary stimulus. That’s one thing the Euro has definitely has going for it.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 06:28:05

To what extent is Wall Street’s inability to properly price in future FFR hikes due to easy lending to securities firms through the Fed window?

Merrill Chief Opens Up on Fed Window
By Susanne Craig
Word Count: 381 | Companies Featured in This Article: Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs Group, Citigroup

Merrill Lynch & Co. Chairman and Chief Executive John Thain hopes the Federal Reserve will continue allowing securities firms to tap a Fed borrowing facility that has helped Wall Street ride out the rocky market. But he thinks securities firms should be able to borrow on different terms than commercial banks.

Securities firms got access to the Fed as a result of the mid-March implosion at Bear Stearns Cos. The move was one of the broadest expansions of the Fed’s lending authority since the 1930s, and it gave brokerage firms from Merill to Goldman Sachs Group Inc. the power to borrow from the Fed on much the same favorable terms as banks.

Comment by Muggy
2008-06-11 07:48:10

I should be abloe to borrow from the fed as much as I want. At least I’d pay it back, or at the very least, intend to.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 06:41:08

The Marketwatchers once again mock themselves with an off-target headline. Meanwhile, most asset prices are dropping like rocks in response to the anti-inflation saber rattling between central bankers.

June 11, 2008 9:37 A.M.ET
BULLETIN
Wary bulls back in the arena
Hesitant pre-market moves on Wall Street. Crude oil bears watching, up about $2 a barrel, ahead of U.S. petroleum updates. Fed speakers and the latest Beige Book also are on radar screens.

Comment by ozajh
2008-06-11 07:56:30

And for the fourth week in a row, a HUGE difference between the consensus crude oil estimate and the actual drawdown.

At some point, even with both gasoline and distillate inventories increasing, the market is going to end its cognitive dissonance over the fact that the US has for the last month CONSISTENTLY been using about 500K barrels a day more than it has been obtaining (either through domestic production or imports).

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 08:29:47

Sounds like higher oil and gasoline prices are on the way. J6P will continue getting thrown under the consumer price inflation bus as a consequence.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2008-06-11 10:47:25

ozajh,

What do they use to estimate “consensus crude oil estimate?”

Comment by ozajh
2008-06-12 05:52:40

Good question.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 11:46:38

June 11, 2008 2:42 P.M.ET
BULLETIN
Stocks’ sell-off is unabated abated by a plunge protection floor of 12,100

Markets falls sharply as soaring crude prices revive worries over consumption and about a possible future rate hike.

 
 
Comment by packman
2008-06-11 06:50:08

An observation. I’ve been following two of the most bubble areas in the country very closely - coincidentally because I work in one - Northern VA, Loudoun county - and my wife’s family is in another - South FL, Sarasota/Bradenton where we may move someday. I’ve been following inventory, median prices, foreclosure numbers, and sale price as a percentage of list price, graphing everything in excel (I’m nerdy that way).

My observation is that in both of these areas - I’m now almost certain that prices will be overshooting on the downside, crossing over in about 18-24 months. In both areas:

- Compared with I would consider “normal” growth rate for these areas of about 5%* since the mid-90’s - prices peaked in late ‘05 at about 100% too high.
- Median prices have fallen quite far - 27% in Loudoun, 29% in Sarasota.
- Thus prices have fallen about 2/3 of the way from peak back to “normal”, since “normal” would be about a 40% price drop (they were 100% above normal, but allowing for 3-4 years of offset of “normal” continuing at 5%)
- Sales are starting to pick up somewhat YoY
- However inventories are still at near-record levels, foreclosures are still rising at an astronomical rate, and sale price percentage is still extremely low - around 90-92% in both areas.

It appears that in both areas we’re only about 18-24 months from when the price point crosses back to “normal” - but since the drivers for price declines are showing no signs of letting up - I think these areas will overshoot, and end up with prices significantly on the low side.

* 5% may be on the high end for “normal”, but that was the rate observed in these areas pre-bubble (early 90’s to 2000 or so), and I think is about right given the growth factors for these areas - Federal government growth for NoVA, baby boomer retirement for Sarasota. However high gas prices are hitting the NoVA commute from Loudoun badly, and tax and insurance issues are hitting Florida - which are probably contributing factors for why these areas will overshoot on the downside.

Comment by JP
2008-06-11 07:29:19

Are you tracking price/rent?
FYI, here in Alexandria I am a data point for $1550 rent in a townhouse that zillows for $400K. (And it used to zillow for $500K. The house next door is smaller and sold for $515K, so it’s not far off.)

I don’t know how these VA numbers resolve without at least another 40% real drop.

Comment by packman
2008-06-11 08:22:13

I’m not sure a good source for that info. I don’t like to rely on anecdotal data from just a few individual homes, as it’s too variant.

Median price of course is also somewhat tainted, however it’s at least across the whole scope of all homes, so it’s the closest thing to what I’d call an accurate picture, outside of Case-Shiller. Case-Shiller only does metro area data, not per-county and doesn’t include a lot of suburban or rural areas. On a county-wide basis zillow seems to follow median prices fairly closely.

 
 
 
Comment by packman
2008-06-11 07:00:03

Hooker Furniture - HOFT - reported a bad quarter, on a “weak retail environment”. Stock down 18% today. Saw that one coming a mile away - finally that short from last fall comes through - cha ching (to toot my horn a bit).

I’m amazed that furniture stocks have been holding up as well as they have, given that that’s the first expense I’d cut back on if I were in a tight financial situation, and since home sales have been tanking.

Comment by WantsOut
2008-06-11 09:08:01

OUCH … I shorted them last quarter on earnings trying for a quick score. Totally off the radar this quarter. Good for you!

 
Comment by Blano
2008-06-11 11:09:42

Oh come on, I’m disappointed with all you people……where’s all the hooker and furniture jokes?? I’ve been waiting all day.

 
 
Comment by takingbets
2008-06-11 07:29:24

Report: New Q1 home closings down 83%

Orlando Business Journal

http://orlando.bizjournals.com/orlando/stories/2008/06/09/daily21.html?ana=yfcpc

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 07:45:54

The byline should read “Q1 new home closings.” The Central Florida new home market is toast.

‘New home closings in the first quarter by Central Florida’s top production home builders fell by 83 percent from the same period last year, according to Charles Wayne Consulting Inc.’

 
 
Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-06-11 07:29:41

Squatters Update:

Well, HBB friends, my career as a squatter is ending soon. I’m renting the house out to another sucker…I mean tenant.

Nah, just kidding. Actually, I’ve done a deal with the bank where they’ll give me $2000 for the keys.

Another bad joke - sorry. In reality, I’ve found a cute little place down by the river on a few acres and will be moving over there in the next few days.

I’m going to give the key to the neighbors, who say they’re going to at least keep watering the yard (free irrigation water), so hopefully the big trees won’t die. That’s what really sucks about all these foreclosures, I hate to see nice established plants turn to dust.

Here’s to all of you and your great support! I still have plenty of Squatters Beer left, if anyone gets out this way.

I’ve lived through an interesting mini-event here, but it’s history in the making on the bigger scale. And you know what? This bubble sucks, it really does. Talk about a great way to create an unstable country. And no, I don’t recommend squatting, though now I can say I’ve been there, done that. If you’re so inclined, what I’d suggest is to just don’t do it and say you did. :)

Comment by Jwhite
2008-06-11 07:59:23

Best of luck Utah, sounds like your moving into a sweet little place. Is there a good garden spot?

Comment by Jwhite
2008-06-11 08:00:37

(”you’re” - I’m anal, I know…)

Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-06-11 08:11:53

I HATE it when that happens, and I have a crappy keyboard :)

The soil in this area is really really good, as it’s in an old (I hope) floodplain. There is a spot for a garden, but there’s an organic farm just down the road, and since I’m out in the backcountry a lot, I’ll just buy from them.

You know, the little taste I had of the uncertainty of it all was enough for me, I really do feel for people who are losing their homes and have nowhere to go, it would really suck. No matter whose fault. They have my compassion, I don’t care if they brought it on themselves. To anyone who says otherwise, I say try it, if you don’t believe me. Of course, I’m not talking about career slackers here (so…I went into the deli, and I said, “Hey cut me some slack”…OK, you finish the joke). :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jwhite
2008-06-11 08:54:30

“Is that a bologna or are ya just glad to see me…” :)

 
Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-06-11 10:40:26

roflmao!!

 
 
 
 
Comment by peaceful
2008-06-11 08:44:35

Glad things are working out so well for you Lost! Thanks for sharing . . . your stories are always of interest . . . : )

Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-06-11 10:41:59

Thanks! I’m sure something else will come up, I seem to live a charmed life! LOL.

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2008-06-11 10:50:11

I too am very happy things are working out for you :)

I’ve enjoyed your posts also.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by NotInMontana
2008-06-11 09:24:13

“so hopefully the big trees won’t die. That’s what really sucks about all these foreclosures”

Yep. People don’t realize the trees need deep watering once in a while, especially since most are non-native.

 
Comment by 2banana
2008-06-11 12:59:26

Grab all the copper pipes on the way out…

 
 
Comment by takingbets
2008-06-11 07:40:13

Not all real estate agents are suffering

http://biz.yahoo.com/cnnm/080611/061108_mcilvaine.html

 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-06-11 07:43:23

Dang! I’ve got to stop doing this, go on a walk and the Market drops like a rock… Down 167 already… Some good buys out there though.

 
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-06-11 07:44:16

Last night’s dream:
I was talking to the leaders about the gas problem, and my character in the dream told the leaders to make business and corporations pay employees a gas credit. So you get your health and gas paid for by your boss.

Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-06-11 08:08:25

Funny, my dream is for the government to adequately fund mass transit infrastructure instead of subsidizing overcrowded freeways.

Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-06-11 08:17:31

I had a dream that I was back in college and didn’t have a car and got everywhere I needed to go on my bicycle. When I wanted to get outta town, I hitched a ride with a friend or rode the train, which would take me from Denver to my home on the W. Slope in Colorado No pets then, though.

Comment by michael
2008-06-11 08:52:09

yall’s dreams suck.

i was with 2 chicks.

: )

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-06-11 09:02:40

Only “two” of your preferrred kind?

Your dream sucks too! :-D

 
 
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-06-11 09:15:04

Lost, I always dream about looking for my dogs.

Who wants to see the photos from this weekend OTR?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by EmperorNorton_II
2008-06-11 09:40:18

I had a dream that I was on a 5 day backpack into the heart of the Sierra Nevada, but that was last week…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-06-11 16:37:20

So THAT’S where you’ve been, shouldda known. :)

 
Comment by EmperorNorton_II
2008-06-11 16:50:54

One does not live by words a loan, so occasionally you gotta go on a walkabout to keep things in perspective…

 
 
Comment by no mo So Cal
2008-06-11 10:18:34

I had a dream I was on a train going into a tunnel…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-06-11 11:08:36

I actually had a WEIRD dream this morning - I was sleeping on a cot in a foreclosure house, I was a genuine squatter (my dogs were bone fido squatters).

Then I woke up…it was REAL.

LMAO!! :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 07:49:07

More bottom calling… I sure wish I had a crystal ball that could see past the end of 2009. Meanwhile, what about the outlook for the next eighteen months?

Outlook upbeat for S.D. office market
Survey predicts progress after ‘09
By Mike Freeman
STAFF WRITER

San Diego’s slumping office market – which has seen vacancy rates rise sharply over the past several quarters – might avoid a years-long downturn, according to survey released yesterday. The survey by the UCLA Anderson Forecast and real estate firm Allen Matkins found upbeat expectations for the office market over the next three years from a panel of developers and investors.

Comment by sf jack
2008-06-11 09:20:06

If the Anderson Forecast says there exists a turning point of some kind in the near future, based on their track record one can be pretty sure it’s a questionable prediction.

 
 
Comment by Jwhite
2008-06-11 08:04:02
 
Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 08:25:20

Regarding previous comment for cold weather HBB’ers where electric is cheaper than oil. Just a quick analysis

1 Btu = 0.000293071kW

139000 BTU/gallon oil

111200 Usable oil at 80% effeciency(Newer boilers might be higher if tuned correctly)

32.5895 kW-hours to replace a gallon of fuel oil

Around my parts in downstate NY juice is roughly .10/kW, round the clock.

$3.26 for electricity at $.10/kW-hour or $????/gal fuel oil. I’m hearing people locking in fuel at $4/gal.

You’ll reduce your heating costs by roughly 18% using electric. If you burn 1000gals a season with those unit prices, $720 is the total reduction. If you do your own work, electric strips run $60/8′ length, the savings will get you 96 linear feet of strip not including wire.

Comment by tresho
2008-06-11 10:04:38

Your point is very interesting. Imagine electric heating is cheaper than oil heating.

 
Comment by packman
2008-06-11 10:04:56

Good analysis.

One thing I’ve been wondering is if we’ll start hearing a lot more about nasty electric rate negotiations with PUC, due to higher fossil fuel costs for the power companies to run the plants. They’ll probably get big electric rate hikes, and then fossil fuel prices will go back down.

Comment by tresho
2008-06-11 10:14:48

The nice thing with electric heating is that the alternative heat source can be left in place, and simply switched on should that become more favorable. Use electric strip heaters doesn’t require replacing a furnace.

Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 10:18:52

Correct but it does require wall space. I neglected to note that breakers aren’t included in that price.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Suzanne
2008-06-11 08:40:10

(My first post.)

I’m refinancing my HELOC to save money, get it down to 2.99 from 4.99 on a balance that is (3% of debt to loan). Everything is the same as last time, except they want me to fill out an IRS 4506-T unlike last time. Blank, which googling - and the form itself - shows me should *not* be done. They say it’s new company policy to do this form.

Other than that, all of the forms I’ve filled out and signed are the same. Assuming they fill in the blanks as the law requires, are there any other reprecussions against me filling out this form? This is not a stated income loan, nor am I working with fake identification and credit ;). My savings would be (5000% savings to debt - that is, current house equity is 50x debt) on the current debt. I don’t foresee a financial disaster personally, nor am I concerned about them cutting the loan arbitrarily to only the amount of the current debt. There are no guarantees I’m aware of that will keep their end of the line open at the current potential debt amount.

Any advice? Other aspects I should examine?

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2008-06-11 09:30:12

Suzanne,

If you have doubts, have a real estate lawyer review your documents. Pay the extra money to make sure your interests are protected.

 
Comment by takingbets
2008-06-11 09:39:24

I.R.S. 4506-T Verification

http://www.cipherdata.com/4506-t-verification.asp

the link says it all, should be no problem as long as you are not/have been commiting fraud on the documents.

 
Comment by walt526
2008-06-11 09:57:24

Yeah, IRS forms is a pain. Ignore them if they are inconvenient. And I’ve found that the best resource for tax and legal advice is an anonymous internet board/blog.

- Inmate 0846481

 
Comment by Blano
2008-06-11 10:18:13

IMHO, do not, I repeat, DO NOT sign a blank 4506 or any other IRS form. “Company policy” is just an excuse, and if they insist, I’d tell them to go pound sand and refi somewhere else.

Comment by Suzanne
2008-06-11 11:35:04

Oh, hell no I’m not signing it blank. Just curious about your views IF I should sign it IF the bank fills it in properly.

Comment by realestateskeptic
2008-06-11 11:46:46

It is a legitimate request if it is filled in and if it is for a Tax year and return you already gave them a “copy” of. Since it is a HELOC, it is not secondary market stuff, but I am pretty sure that form is required for Fannie/Freddie loan packages. Do NOT sign it in blank. Why they think someone who provided a fraudulent Tax return would be concerned that a Bank will see an “as filed” return, after the fact, is beyond me. Probably a Barney Frank amendment. If they want a future tax return they should request permission when they are going to do it (never heard or saw that happen).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2008-06-11 10:29:47

Suzanne,

I agree with Blano. Do not sign a blank form. Would you just sign your check and hope the person you gave it to would be honest enough to fill in the amount you had stipulated? Also spend a little more money and go see a real estate lawyer. Protect your interests.

Comment by Suzanne
2008-06-11 11:39:55

Oh, hell no I’m not signing it blank. Just curious about your views IF I should sign it IF the bank fills it in properly.

There’s so little debt, and I plan to pay if off by end-of-year anyway, that I’m pretty much just figuring on telling the bank to pound sand. The $50 or so - total! - I’d save in interest from the re-fi isn’t worth this hassle.

But thought the question was worth raising in this forum. The (properly filled out) IRS 4506-T seems to be a new requirement everywhere; maybe borrowers are fraudulently applying, and/or bank auditors are requiring as a fraud check. Perhaps folks have commentary about the requirement (again, assuming it’s properly filled out)? Any repurcussions to signing one, if I’m a loan consumer who (apparently unusually) DIDN’T lie in her loan application?

Comment by hoz
2008-06-11 12:15:13

The 4506T is fine to sign if filled in properly. The 4506T allows the bank to pull your tax returns. Assuming there is no fraud, it is no big deal.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2008-06-11 15:44:31

It is fine to sign if you are absolutely positive the bank will properly dispose of the records (burn or shred) when they no longer need them, or will even bother to figure out when they no longer need them. If you are only going to save about $50, IMHO is that the risk of identity theft isn’t worth it. Just pay off the sucker as fast as you can.

But do ask them about their document disposal policy and security measures. It would be fun to see what their response is to that.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 08:40:53

Some folks get two houses, some get two stimulus checks, but we have none of either (still hoping to at least eventually get stimulus…).

TAXWATCH
Stimulating confusion
As millions of taxpayers await checks, others find themselves with two
By Andrea Coombes, MarketWatch
Last update: 7:37 p.m. EDT June 10, 2008

Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 09:17:06

“As millions of taxpayers await checks, others find themselves with two”

Who the hell is running things down there???? Ooopsy…. I nearly forgot.

Comment by Blano
2008-06-11 10:12:50

1,500 out of 66.6 million is a problem??? Are you saying Osama Obama and friends could do better??

Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 15:41:26

Sorry but when your objective is to prove how horrible govt is and it comes back to haunt you, there is no excuse. ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by mgnyc99
2008-06-11 10:22:36

still have not recieved my stimulus check either

god knows when it will come.

good thing i am not counting on that money for anything except a trip to my local bank to deposit it

Comment by Arizona Slim
2008-06-11 11:57:53

Has anyone gotten theirs yet?

Comment by NotInMontana
2008-06-11 12:30:01

Got mine weeks ago, electronically.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by salinasron
2008-06-11 12:33:15

Mine just came in todays mail.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by JRinUT
2008-06-11 13:02:28

Utah State Tax Commission ganked more than 1k of them before they hit the intented recipients. People owing back taxes to the state.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-06-11 15:53:41

I did not get mine. But I think I get a deduction in estimateds.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by txchick57
Comment by tresho
2008-06-11 10:12:10

Unfortunately, the only parts of that proposal that would have an effect within the next 12 months are (1) “Cut earmarks to fund gas tax holiday” and (2) “Halt oil shipments to SPR”, for a total savings of $0.23/gal. Big. Deal. There are basically no quick solutions, we are paying the price for avoiding the issue since 1973, and the economic chickens are coming home to roost.

Comment by measton
2008-06-11 14:53:17

So maybe we should have listened to Carter?

 
 
 
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-06-11 10:06:34

(still hoping to at least eventually get stimulus…).
Maybe in 2013 we will get a great package deal.

 
Comment by Ouro Verde
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2008-06-11 10:34:29

Great pictures Ouro Verde.

It’s great to put faces to the names on the blog.

Thank you.

 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-06-11 10:37:17

Nice.

Some good pictures there.

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-06-11 11:08:52

Thank you ET.

 
 
Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-06-11 10:58:40

Thanks for sharing! A nice looking bunch! Hwy, LOVE your beard - you’d fit right in with the river rats at Ray’s Tavern. Ben, it’s amazing, I thought all these people that posted on your blog were just figments of my imagination! They’re real people, imagine that!

It would be fun to have a slideshow like Ouro did with photos of all the posters who want to submit. I’ll go first - here’s mine:

http://tinyurl.com/cg5gf

Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2008-06-11 13:40:36

Thanks Lost!…had those whiskers since my motorcycle trip to Alaska in 1979… :-)

I’m planning on taking my 6 year old son Mr. Cole to Escalante & Capital Reef & Moab …not sure just when, I’d love him to smell the air after a summer downpour, maybe even see some lightening … If I make it I’ll be sure to hit Ray’s Tavern…do they have Squatters Beer there? First mugs on me! :-)

Congrats by the way on finding your *New* digs! ;-)

Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-06-11 17:37:54

Let me know, I’ll take you up on it, maybe also can tell you some good “secret” spots - also a great place to find dino bone, your son would probably like that!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-06-11 11:45:35

I am sitting here w/a giant grin on my face finally able to put faces w/all those words of wit and wisdom. It’s sort of like going to a class reunion. People you don’t know but you know and admire. Of course I wasn’t there but somehow those photos made me feel a little bit closer to meeting everyone. Very cool. Looks like everyone was having a great time.

Thanks Ouro
Thanks Ben

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-06-11 12:21:10

Thanks a bunch, ouro. It’s great to put some faces to the names.
That looked like a great time, too. Now I want Ben to take a trip up here even more. Ben! Ben! Come visit!

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2008-06-11 12:50:27

Hi Ouro,

Great pictures. Nice to put faces to the names used on this blog.

Thank you.

 
Comment by lostcontrol
2008-06-11 12:57:48

Great slideshow. Must say, that the picture of lostcontrol is a hansom devil, however it wasn’t me, not that there is anything wrong with that. Sorry, I didn’t attend.

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-06-11 14:39:19

Ok, who is the guy holding the beer jugs? and who was sitting on my right? and sorry I forget tim’s posting name.

 
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-06-11 15:55:12

Ok that person is named waiting in LA.
I waited there too, but then I moved to san diego.
Still waiting.

 
 
Comment by Kim
2008-06-11 13:25:33

Very cool! Thanks for sharing those!

 
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2008-06-11 13:55:36

Thanks Ouro for your efforts & enthusiasm! Like I said…let’s all have a beach party this summer down at Moonlight’s! B.Y.O.W. & I’ll bring the firewood & a Boombox playing the “Traveling Wilbury’s: “End of the Line” :-)

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-06-11 16:59:53

BYOW= wine or what?
Hey, CArenter and I will be there for sure.
It was fun to see my own kind. We are not alone now.

 
 
Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 14:43:07

Great pics. After some of the RE bull$hit I’ve heard in the last 24 hours, I could use the company of some sane people like HBB’ers.

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
 
Comment by takingbets
2008-06-11 10:34:47

Pimco’s McCulley: Government Understating Inflation
Wednesday June 11, 12:43 pm ET

“The economy is going to be suffering a lot longer than Wall Street,” he said. “Wall Street has gone through absolute hell the last 10 months or so, whereas Main Street moves at a slower pace. Main Street is taking on some serious heat from the property market deflation and now this slap in the face of $100 to fill up your Escalade.”

Despite rampant speculation, McCulley doubts Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke will push for the central bank to start raising interest rates, even if the European Central Bank does so.

“I don’t think the Fed’s going to hike rates this year,” he said. “I think Mr. Bernanke’s doing what a good central banker is supposed to do. As a practical matter I don’t think there is latitude for hiking rates this year.”

http://biz.yahoo.com/cnbc/080611/25094854.html

 
Comment by EmperorNorton_II
2008-06-11 10:46:31

The torrential rains in the flyover breadbasket are merely the flipside to the drought in the southwest…

One happens overnight, while the other just sneaks up on you over the course of years while you weren’t looking~

The end result is a lack of food.

In a world with less and less food, why did 80,000 South Koreans hold a candlelight protest demonstration, against the resumed imports of U.S. Beef?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/11/us-beef-protest-draws-clo_n_106462.html

 
Comment by mina
2008-06-11 11:48:30

I just found out that my brother and his wife are ready to sign a contract on a newer, bigger house down the street from their existing house without a HSC.

they know I have been following the market and RE for over three years. think they asked for my advice? if you said “no”, you’d be right!

when I called my brother this morning I learned that he is basing his shrewd decision-making on the advice of buddy who is a RE agent and is handling this transaction. do you think my brother appreciated it when I pointed out his friend stands to $$$ benefit only if he buys this new house? if you said “no”, you’d be right!

when he said “well it’s ok because houses are selling quickly in MY neighborhood (says his RE agent) so surely MY house will sell quickly!” and I responded with “everyone says that” do you think he understood what that meant? if you said “no”, you’d be right!

Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-06-11 13:21:45

mina, had the same thing happen with a friend, it’s truly hopeless. These people don’t buy with their best interests in mind, they buy with their emotions. All you can do is plant a tree or light a candle for them, they’re toast.

Comment by exeter
2008-06-11 14:25:01

The denial runs to unknown depths…. still. I’m dumfounded.

 
 
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-06-11 14:55:50

Yesterday, my own smart brother emailed me to ask me if I wanted to buy now that prices have fallen 20%.
No.

 
 
Comment by arroyogrande
2008-06-11 12:02:25

Looks like fixed rate mortgages (both conforming and jumbo) are on the way up again…

http://www.bankrate.com/brm/graphs/graph_trend.asp?tf=360&ct=Line&prods=1,325&gs=275,250&st=zz&c3d=False&web=brm&cc=1&prodtype=M&bgcolor=&topgap=&bottomgap=&rightgap=&leftgap=&seriescolor=

The lower fixed rates of early this year are now but a dream (by about 1% and rising…)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 12:17:21

Canseco’s $2.5 million home foreclosed on
Updated: June 2, 2008, 1:30 PM EST

LOS ANGELES (AP) - Jose Canseco, the former AL MVP who made millions during his baseball career, has had his home foreclosed.

Canseco told the syndicated TV show “Inside Edition” that he walked away from his $2.5 million, 7,300-square foot home in suburban Encino because it didn’t make sense to continue making payments.

“I do have a judgment on my home and it to me is very strange because it didn’t make financial sense for me to keep paying a mortgage on a home that was basically owned by someone else,” he said in an interview that aired Thursday.

“You know my life, this financial thing, is a very complicated issue. Obviously, when you make all that money, people think, ‘OK, let’s assume it is $35 million.’ People have to understand that $35 million, you’re paying the government 41 percent. That leaves you with about $17 or $18 million, not even. Then you’re taking care of your whole family.”

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 12:19:40

Do the math:

2.5m/17m*100 = 14.7 pct. Most of us could probably figure out how to buy a home that cost 14.7 pct of our contract pay without taking out a loan.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 12:20:47

I forgot to reiterate that the 17m is the take home portion of his contract pay. Sheesh!

Comment by ET-Chicago
2008-06-11 12:31:44

Even before you ran the numbers, Canseco is someone it’s very hard to find sympathy for.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by NoVa Sideliner
2008-06-11 12:23:23

That leaves you with about $17 or $18 million, not even. Then you’re taking care of your whole family.

Yeah, I’d sure have a hard time taking care of my family with only $17 million…

Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-06-11 12:53:51

“Then you’re taking care of your whole family.”

Course, when everyone knows you’re making that much, “family” probably means uncles, cousins, long lost high school buds.

Still, Jose. Not a lotta sympthy here.

 
 
Comment by EmperorNorton_II
2008-06-11 14:24:32

Holyfield and now Canseco have lost their homes to foreclosure…

We live in a sports-celebrity cult world, and don’t think the hoi polloi isn’t taking notice of goings on.

“Foreclosing With The Stars”
(I just through you a bone, Hollywood)

 
 
Comment by peaceful
2008-06-11 12:37:29

Breaking: Obama severs his Countrywide connection

Breaking news from the Associated Press: The Obama campaign has just announced that Jim Johnson, who received a special loan from Countrywide under a “friends of Angelo” (Mozilo) program, has quit the campaign. From the A.P.: “A leader of Democrat Barack Obama’s vice presidential research team has resigned amid criticism over his personal loan deals. Obama announced in a statement Wednesday that Jim Johnson was stepping aside to avoid distracting from the vetting process.”

 
Comment by txchick57
 
Comment by FP
2008-06-11 12:41:20

Finally put some gas in my car since it was on a qtr tank. Paid $4.57 for 89 grade. The pump was very slow. I wasn’t sure if it was a technical thing or the Service Station Gas Tank is close to empty but I did notice a few things while I waited impatiently to finish filling my tank.

1. The pump across from me showed $10 dollars for 2 gallons. I guess the customer wanted to at least get back home safely. Who knows..

2. A van pulled up behind me and a hispanic lady came out and prepaid at the cashier. No card I guess. Well, she drove off after maybe less than 60 seconds of pumping gas.

3. several teenagers in a new Mustang put three gallons and left.

4. A black guy standing near the air station listening to his iPod was very suspicious until another call pulled up and handed him cash. He took the cash and went to his car which is parked and drove it to the nearest pump to get some gas. The car had the bling bling stuff.

5. A construction truck was in pumping gas before me was still pumping gas when I left. I paid $80.00 and I’m sure he was at $150.

Very interesting.

Comment by CarrieAnn
2008-06-11 13:03:26

Wow!

What area are you reporting from, FP?

Comment by FP
2008-06-11 14:45:49

The crazy place they call the Bay Area, CA.

 
 
Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-06-11 13:25:42

I was watching a farmer put gas into a container in the back of his pickup for his tractors and equipment. I knew this was what it was for because I was talking to him as he paid the bill - $650 - I clutched my heart and he just gave me a wry smile. And now the farmers can’t even sell out to the developers if they go under…

Comment by hoz
2008-06-11 14:29:05

Probably getting the gas for his quads, lol

Wheee, lots of great trails in Utah. maybe someday

Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-06-11 16:40:41

lots of great youtube videos of trails - Moab, San Rafael…

geez, I can’t believe I just said that, but well, OK, it’s Hoz, he can come out with his ORV…

as long as he brings some Tall Risk beer

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-06-11 15:05:34

Yeah, I just swallowed my pride and tried to fill up.
The meter before I paid read $74.00. That freaked me out.
With $30.00 I barely got a 1/3 of a tank. So to celebrate,
I took a joy ride down the coast just to remember the good old days. It was as high as $4.69 for regular.

Comment by cactus
2008-06-11 21:07:45

These high gas prices might turn out to be a far bigger story than the housing bubble

 
 
Comment by Anthony
2008-06-11 15:37:39

In Eureka, California, 87 Octane is at $4.699 which is very likely the highest price in the nation for any town.

Comment by tresho
2008-06-11 16:06:44

Californiagasprices.com states regular is $4.799 in San Luis Obispo this afternoon. A really remote place like Beaver Island, MI is $5.499.

 
 
 
Comment by hoz
2008-06-11 12:43:42

“There, the central bank moved quickly to raise interest rates despite comparatively mild price pressures. The country suffered enormous inflation in the late 1980s and early 1990s before getting the problem under control. “Brazil knows better than anyone what happens with hyperinflation,” says Terrence Gray, who manages $3 billion in emerging-market stocks at DWS Scudder, an arm of Deutsche Bank.”
WSJ
Fiscal responsibility versus wishing and hoping oil and food prices come down. Thank you Brazil.

and in other news

“One of the key themes running through McKenzie’s book is that the “obvious” reason for pricing disparities isn’t necessarily the real reason. For instance, popcorn isn’t costly at the theater because of a captive audience, he explains. Rather, it’s the more complicated outcome of an antitrust ruling involving movie theaters 60 years ago….”
business week

 
Comment by reuven
2008-06-11 12:47:57

The leader of Barack H. Obama’s VP search team just resigned, amid a loan scandal. He did some crooked mortgages when he ran Fannie Mae.

You can usually judge people by the company they keep. Obama’s not a nice-but-misguided person (my first impression of Jimmy Carter back in 1976, for example). He’s a wheeler-dealer, trying to stack the mortgage business so his buddies can buy mansions and yachts.

Comment by txchick57
2008-06-11 12:58:35

I posted that a number of times over the past few days.

“That’s not the Jim Johnson I knew”

He really doesn’t function too well without a teleprompter to tell him what to say.

Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2008-06-11 13:28:57

“He really doesn’t function too well without a teleprompter to tell him what to say.”

Has the swift boat mud slingers got anything on his ability to chew pretzels… speaking of Shrub… since the “decider” was Commander -n -Chief at the time he was “wounded” in that pretzel “attack” does get to apply for a “purple heart” ? ;-)

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2008-06-11 13:11:28

mansions and yachts.

“Yes, I am Elmer J. Fudd, millionaire. I own a mansion and a yacht.”

 
Comment by sartre
2008-06-11 13:37:33

Yeah I am sure everyone in mccain’s entourage descended from King Solomon.

Comment by reuven
2008-06-11 17:07:15

No, he’s probably even dirtier. But if I am to support a liberal (and I’m very progressive when it comes to things like Universal Health Care, etc), I want him to be an honest one!

Comment by sartre
2008-06-11 20:11:04

…on the other hand conservatives are assumed to be corrupt and thats a good thing?
keep dreaming, this is politicians we are talking about right?
and btw, when did it become the norm that every person a politician should come in contact with should be vetted by a committee for all their life’s doings?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2008-06-11 12:54:21

Is anyone else having problems with posting?

I’ve posted a couple of comments over two hours ago and none of them has showed up.

Comment by Lost In Utah
2008-06-11 13:26:55

Same here, but they do eventually show up. I think the server’s going rogue cause it knows Ben’s out of town.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2008-06-11 13:40:40

Well shut my mouth ;) my postings have shown up.

Darn that rogue server.

 
 
Comment by txchick57
2008-06-11 12:59:39

getting a little longer. Up to 80% now.

have a good one ya’ll

 
Comment by Peterpaul
2008-06-11 13:47:29

Warning…do not read this if you do not have a sick sense of humor:

OBAMA: He’s not the only black man to ask for change.

 
Comment by hoz
2008-06-11 14:14:16

” TORONTO (Reuters) - Thousands of problem gamblers in have launched a $3.5 billion class action lawsuit in Ontario, saying they were allowed into provincially run casinos despite signing up for a program that should have denied them entry.

According to the CBC’s website, the suit was filed earlier this week in Toronto, claiming the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. did not fully enforce a “self exclusion” program that allows problem gamblers to ban themselves from casinos.

Those who sign up for the program are photographed and their personal information is stored in binders at all of the province’s casinos.

If program members are caught trying to enter a casino they can be arrested for trespassing.

According to the CBC, gamblers who had signed up for the program said it was not working, including one who returned frequently for years after signing up for the program.”

Protect the stupid homebuyers , the stupid gamblers, the stupid banks, the stupid finance firms, the stupid… Where the hell is personal responsibility? I am so sick of whiners! “Its not my fault! The bank did not explain the papers well enough.”

“I get to go to lots of overseas places, like Canada.” Sen. Robert Dole
“Smoking kills. If you’re killed, you’ve lost a very important part of your life.” Ms. Brooke Shield
“The streets are safe in Philadelphia. It’s only the people who make them unsafe.” Frank Rizzo, Mayor

Comment by Ernest
2008-06-11 14:24:14

I’m a victim damn it!

 
 
Comment by EmperorNorton_II
2008-06-11 14:43:43

1998 refrain: “I did not have sexual relations with that woman”

2008 refrain: “I did not have financial relations with that bank”

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-06-11 17:05:30

2008 harmony refrain: I never signed that loan.

Tra la la boom Dee Ay
my nieghbor foreclosed today.

Was that a camp song?

 
 
Comment by hoz
2008-06-11 15:18:10

A pretty cool graph from Mr. Paul Kedrosky

http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2008/06/11/visualizing_glo.html

A visualization of world oil from 1965 -2007

On the right side is a drop down that allows reference, I like size./

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-06-11 15:54:52

Asia wins the race by 10 lengths…

 
Comment by tresho
2008-06-11 16:00:47

Here’s a very telling list of figures from Paul Kedrosky’s source document, worldwide oil production figures, per year, over the last 4 full years.

Production, mb/d Year
80326 - 2004
81255 - 2005
81659 - 2006
81533 - 2007 (down 0.2% from 2006)

Crude oil production data in million barrels/day (mb/d) includes crude oil, shale oil, oil sands and NGLs (natural gas liquids - the liquid content of natural gas where this is recovered separately). It excludes liquid fuels from other sources such as biomass and coal derivatives.

 
 
Comment by hoz
2008-06-11 16:38:27

And where are the mopes skimping to pay for gas?

“…The number of underinsured U.S. adults—that is, people who have health coverage that does not adequately protect them from high medical expenses—has risen dramatically, a Commonwealth Fund study finds. As of 2007, there were an estimated 25 million underinsured adults in the United States, up 60 percent from 2003.

Much of this growth comes from the ranks of the middle class. While low-income people remain vulnerable, middle-income families have been hit hardest. For adults with incomes above 200 percent of the federal poverty level (about $40,000 per year for a family), the underinsured rates nearly tripled since 2003…”

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/publications_show.htm?doc_id=688615

The increase in the high deductible, underinsured population is going to be a major problem. This is a credible source and worth the read. So from 2003 to 2007 during the Bush boom years the problem got worse.

Comment by Ouro Verde
2008-06-11 17:12:14

My friend says her private health insurance is 700.00 a month.
She just turned 60.
Mine went up 42.00 a month. Reaching for pills

 
 
Comment by lostcontrol
2008-06-11 17:27:43

For anyone looking for a challenge on Economics- Here is your opportunity.

Thursday June 12th 2008

Severe contest: The Economist Debate Series The Economist invites you to participate in Oxford-style debates

Since its inception The Economist has challenged readers to engage with the world’s business, political, scientific, technological and cultural affairs and uncover the connections between them.

We now challenge you to bring your knowledge to the floor of our online Oxford-style debates. Your participation shapes the contest and your votes decide the winner.

http://www.economist.com/debate/

 
Comment by Ria Rhodes
2008-06-11 17:46:41

I’ve got an old friend from France whose been out of work for a year and a half because of layoff and an injury. He gets a regular check and he has pretty good health coverage. He thinks he’ll find another job before the holidays. We talk about the situation for lots of low/middle income working people. The consensus amongst his group of European acquaintances? They thank God they aren’t in a tough situation in America. No safety nets here, but I told him we’re a proud population of rugged individualists who’ll somehow manage. We had a big laugh over that one.

 
Comment by alta
2008-06-11 19:00:04

Mortgage funds shaken by housing downturn - “Is my money all gone?”

http://origin.santacruzsentinel.com/business/ci_9537850

 
Comment by reuven
2008-06-11 19:23:34

Crap!

McCain, who used to have strong words for the deadbeat specuvestors, has BACKPEDALED!

In today’s New York Times, he said:

As the home mortgage crisis deepened this spring, Mr. McCain decided that more federal intervention was needed to help homeowners keep their homes than he had previously indicated,

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/11/us/politics/11campaign.html?scp=2&sq=mortgage&st=nyt

Just calling upside-down people “homeowners” when they own nothing is disgusting enough. But wanting to confiscate my money to help greedy specuvesters is enough to make me want to puke. There’s NOBODY to vote for!

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-06-11 19:44:42

“War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent.”

George Orwell

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post