October 20, 2008

Bits Bucket For October 20, 2008

Please visit the HBB Forum. Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

376 Comments »

Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 05:00:07

Weimar*t

Always low currency prices!

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 05:15:44

Wall Street Journal
* THE OUTLOOK
* OCTOBER 20, 2008

Against the Odds, Financial Crisis Helps Stimulate the Dollar
By JOANNA SLATER

Comment by combotechie
2008-10-20 05:37:36

“… the dollar has benefitted from the global flight from risky assets as well as the unwinding of bets made with borrowed cash.”

This “undwinding of bets made with borrowed cash” involves a lot of financial destruction, a lot of writedowns, a lot of dollars disappearing into thin air from whence they came.

These vanishing dollars increases the scarcy of the dollars that remain, thus increasing their value, increasing their buying power.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 05:40:41

Every Dollar is backed by a pyramid scheme.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 05:42:20

What backs gold?

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 05:46:49

dude, Novus Ordo Seclorum

 
Comment by wmbz
2008-10-20 05:50:27

Gold.

 
Comment by VirginiaTechDan
2008-10-20 05:54:05

What “backs” checkin and eggs or gasoline. The only thing that matters is limited supply and strong demand. It doesn’t matter why people want gold (or dollars) they will continue to want gold so long as it holds value in most people’s eyes, which it will.

Dollars on the other hand will lose value with supply increase and demand destruction by foreign countries.

Those who make fun of “gold” as being “have limited real value” miss understand the nature of value (all value is subjective and relative). Gold may have no value to them, but for others it has a lot of value (for what ever reason).

Name something better than gold or silver to serve as an international money. Gold and silver were selected by free-market processes and have withstood the test of time.

 
Comment by realestateskeptic
2008-10-20 05:59:52

Isn’t that printed on every US dollar bill? Kind of a circle of life thing then ;-)

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 06:01:00

Lying kings

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 06:04:48

“Novus Ordo Seclorum”

Apparently that is what supports the dollar (take a look at the backside of a greenback if you don’t believe me). Something else must account for gold’s widespread appeal, though I personally don’t get it.

 
Comment by bluprint
2008-10-20 06:18:26

What backs gold?

It’s strength as a currency long-term, in addition to the attributes like portability, divisibility, etc, is the fact that it has some value other than as just a currency.

Much like how cigarettes might be traded in a prison even amoung those who don’t smoke.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 06:23:36

My father lived in occupied Europe all of World War 2, and one could procure virtually anything on the black market if you had one of these 2 currencies:

Gold
Cigarettes

Keep in mind that smoking fags was tres chic back then, compared to now…

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 06:24:00

“…is the fact that it has some value other than as just a currency…”

Irrelevant.

 
Comment by bluprint
2008-10-20 06:36:05

No Prof, that’s the basis of how an asset becomes a currency. It’s starts out as simple trade/barter, except one particular asset becomes “currency” because of it’s other qualities (portability, divisibility, homogeneity, etc.).

Cigarettes are a great example. First they have value (to smokers) then that value becomes the basis for trading cigarettes as a common currency even amoung non-smokers.

 
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2008-10-20 06:50:40

“Those who make fun of “gold” as being “have limited real value” miss understand the nature of value (all value is subjective and relative). Gold may have no value to them, but for others it has a lot of value (for what ever reason).”

Dan, I think the point is that the reason for gold’s value is volatile and ephemeral (witness the decline in the 80’s). When looking at fundamentals underlying value, you have to ask yourself how lasting those fundamental reasons are.

 
Comment by yogurt
2008-10-20 07:25:00

What “backs” checkin and eggs or gasoline.

Utility.

What backs gold? It’s strength as a currency long-term

Kind of depends when that term starts, doesn’t it? If you bought in 1980, you haven’t seen much strength.

Even if you go back to the 30’s, a real total return of zero is not much to get excited about.

 
Comment by shizo
2008-10-20 07:31:24

Hey Alad,

Can you do me a favor? Go to eBay, search: silver or gold bullion, and click either an auction or one of the additional pages in the queue… Let me know what happens on your end.
I have been trying for 3 days. Other auctions work. Silver and gold just sit there till my browser times out. Explorer, firefox and chrome.

Thanks-

 
Comment by bluprint
2008-10-20 07:37:18

Kind of depends when that term starts, doesn’t it?

Um, you are misreading my post. Try it again and read past the comma this time. If it helps you can take out the part between the commas:

It’s strength as a currency long-term is the fact that…

I make no claims about how the exchange rate between gold and any other asset will change or whether the currenct exhange rate will increase or decrease or anything else. I was merely addressing gold’s use as a currency and how that came to be.

Even if you go back to the 30’s, a real total return of zero is not much to get excited about.

Who said anything about a return? We are talking about currency. Gold is also terrible when used as fishing bait but no one made such a claim so it would be totally out of context for me to point that out at this time.

Since it seems we are on the subject of what gold doesn’t do well, I would also recommend you don’t use it as a turkey baster.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 07:42:05

shizo,

I seldom look on eBay, so I just took a look at the current offerings of Gold bullion and there were odds and ends, a lot of hocus-pocus penny ante stuff (1 Gram bars, tiny 22k $20 saint reproductions, etc)
but only a few lots of any substance that were ending today.

1 oz Gold coins seem to fetch $925-950

I had no problem accessing this information…

 
Comment by Ed G
2008-10-20 07:53:52

A greenspan of a different time once wrote about gold:

http://www.alsjazeera.com/gold_and_economic_freedom_alan_greenspan_1966.html

Homogenious, divisible, rare, durable, and a luxury item. That’s what makes Gold a good ‘money’.

 
Comment by realestateskeptic
2008-10-20 07:56:05

Why not look at Apmex or Tulving (if you can afford volume). Ebay seems a bit to risky and inefficient for me to buy any 1 oz or greater Gold coins. I was very lucky to find a local source and friend (jeweler) who I never though about having gold coins until he called on a business matter and I asked him about Gold and how he manages his jewelery inventory. He has a large cash business component at his store and as it turns out a very healthy stash of K’rands he has built over 20 years. He was willing to part with some and sell them to me at spot plus $25 which made me very happy, and barley nicked his collection.

 
Comment by rms
2008-10-20 07:56:35

“Much like how cigarettes might be traded in a prison even amoung those who don’t smoke.”

Years ago military rations used to have a four cigarettes included. Non-smokers used to trade them for rations (food) from the smokers.

 
Comment by shizo
2008-10-20 08:22:58

Thanks! I thought I was losing it. Tin foil hat into the recycle bin…

 
Comment by liwei
2008-10-20 08:41:52

I just check finished auction on Ebay for 1oz Gold coin. Mostly they are in range of $1000 to $1050. If you can make Kitco deliver, even with $100 delivery fee, one can still earn $50 a piece. While it looks that way, maybe $100 delivery fee is underestimated, because one can certainly makes money that way if it is true.

 
Comment by lucy
2008-10-20 08:50:49

Gold is far from perfect as a store of value but, as churchill said of democracy, its better than all of the alternatives.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-10-20 08:51:08

A very interesting discussion. Thank you all. I’ve been trying to wrap my little brain around the subjects of gold/currency/’real’ value, for a while now, much like a flimsy tortilla around too many beans and chilis, and I believe I’m starting to get it lately.
And I didn’t even have to go take a class! I just read this blog…saved me lots of cigarettes and gold ingots, there.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-10-20 08:59:10

One thing needs to return before PM would become an accepted standard of commerce.

 
Comment by Skip
2008-10-20 09:03:50

What is the shelf life of cigarettes? Do they go bad after a certain period of time?

 
Comment by A.B. Dada
2008-10-20 09:11:31

If you want to understand gold’s value, and want to become a goldbug overnight, Google “What has government done to our money?” by Murray N. Rothbard.

Mises Institute has a free ebook in PDF form. It takes less than an afternoon to read. It is easily the most important book ever written. As a Christian, I believe it may well be more important than Scripture, because Rothbard’s book is clear, concise, written in simpleton English, and makes sense to everyone I know.

I buy approximately 100 copies a year, and give them away. I have yet to have one person not understand it and say “Holy $h_t” after reading it.

For those who know me in real life, I am selling 5g 24K gold bars, including a .900 silver necklace plated in gold, for $150 in person. I have over 1000 handy, and they’re gorgeous to wear to show off your love of real money that has held value for thousands of years. Just ask me for November’s special if you see me, they’ll be gone before the month of November is out.

Also selling 25 cent 1959 quarters (90%) for $2.00 in person. Got thousands of them, as well as my portable .001 ounce scale to confirm weight.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 09:18:16

Just got off the phone with my friend, the Bullion Brahmin…

He says it’s dead in the water.

Most of the calls he’s fielding in his retail store have the proles upset that he’s not selling @ spot prices, on the small amounts he has for sale on occasion (you could purchase up to 32 oz’s @ $100 over spot, today) and nobody’s selling him much of anything, so it’s a Mexican Standoff.

He told me that around 75,000 2008 Silver Eagles have been released to wholesalers this week, by the U.S. Mint.

This puts the mint only behind by around 500,000 on their commitments to their wholesalers, who sold these coins to smaller dealers, based upon the mint’s promise of delivery…

Even with the release of these coins (wholesalers cost from the mint: about $1.50 over spot) the wholesale bid for any year of 1 oz Silver Eagles is still $6 over.

That’s how insatiable the demand is…

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-10-20 09:29:59

‘What is the shelf life of cigarettes? Do they go bad after a certain period of time?’

Yes, they do. I don’t know how long it takes.
I smoke a corn-cob pipe now and then for the style of it–I made the pipe after I re-read Huckleberry Finn 2 years ago, it was fun, you should all try it, I used a hydrangea twig for the stem–and my pipe-weed hasn’t gone stale, but it’s real tobacco shreds. The eccentric old coot I get it from told me that it’s ‘good for my health’. And that cigarettes, manufactured ones anyway, are made from tobacco ‘paper’ which is kind of the processed leaf, flattened and dried and shredded. I never checked out his word, I just nodded solemnly. But anyway, cigarettes do get all harsh and dry and stale eventually. Maybe they’re only worth half value then?

 
Comment by shizo
2008-10-20 09:50:35

I was the “Marlboro Man” for a stint while in college for a local Air Force base. Cigarettes do expire by a date certain, but they last for a damn long time. They are sealed pretty well, and do lose moisture over time like mentioned above- but overall they will last many, many years. Being a bit “harsh/dry” makes no difference to some one jonesin’ for a cig.

 
Comment by yogurt
2008-10-20 09:51:00

I make no claims about how the exchange rate between gold and any other asset will change or whether the currenct exhange rate will increase or decrease or anything else. I was merely addressing gold’s use as a currency and how that came to be.

Well OK. But to me and a lot of other people, “strength as a currency” means how much stuff you can buy with it.

 
Comment by bluprint
2008-10-20 10:12:21

Dude, you are totally misinterpretting that statement, which seems logical since you have apparently just taken it totally out of context without regard for all the words around that short phrase.

Perhaps I misused commas in some regard that caused the confusion. I think I misuse commas a lot.

The question was, “what backs gold?”.

My answer, now in condensed form and re-phrased to try and alleviate confusion, is:

“the value assigned to it by lots of people for reasons other than its use as a currency.”

The “strength as a currency” is the thing we are discussing. Perhaps if there is an english teacher here, he/she would point out “Its strength as a currency” is the subject of that sentence. (?)

When currency/money is “backed” then that backing is what provides the “strength as a currency” to the asset. What gives gold its strength as a currency? What gives the dollar its strength as a currency? I wasn’t making an absolute statement like “Gold is backed by its strength as a currency.”

I was saying “Its strength as a currency (i.e. what it is backed by) is derived from its value in other regards than just the value assigned to it because of its use as a money (e.g. use in electronics or jewelry or to serve as a luxury item)”.

This is similar to your response of “utility”, which is short-hand for the fact that some people assign value to those items based on something other than just currency. It could be value gained from the assets’ utility as food, tools or jewelry.

 
Comment by David Cee
2008-10-20 10:31:48

“That’s how insatiable the demand is…”

Same argument used for Tulips circa 1620 in Holland,
and how did that work out?

I think the term “Fool’s Gold” was never more appropriate than what is happening today.

 
Comment by bluprint
2008-10-20 11:38:51

I think the term “Fool’s Gold” was never more appropriate than what is happening today.

David, you may indeed be right. I just want to point out that it’s possible to distinguish between fundamentals of what makes an asset a good money/currency and the case of the current exchange rate of those assets.

Not many people on this board or elsewhere seem able (or willing?) to distinguish. See yogurt for example wanting to mix in the situation of the current exhange rate with the discussion of whether gold is generally a “good” money to the point of translating my statements incorrectly.

Gold is fundamentally a good money. However, it may be the case that the current exchange rate of gold to (insert other asset(s) here) is out of whack.

Or not. I’m not sure about that really.

 
Comment by Greg
2008-10-20 22:33:27

It amazes me that you guys spend so much time nearly every day having the same argument. For crying out loud, we’ve heard all your predictions (inflation/deflation) 4000 times over. Get off it already and discuss something with some meaning.

 
 
Comment by ButImNotDeadYet
2008-10-20 07:12:14

During the 1650’s in colonial America, tobacco was used as a state-sanctioned currency in the colony of Virginia…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 07:28:07

Money of necessity has included coins made out on cannons, in Ireland. Also known as “gun money”.

Take a look:

http://www.pennylicious.com/images/2006-09/gunmoney.jpg

 
 
Comment by The Middling Lebowski
2008-10-20 07:23:15

Mind if I do a de-lurk?

What if, like, the price of gold stayed exactly the same for the next 10 years. So after all this arguing, aladin and combo would be, like, both equally right. That would be far out.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 07:30:47

dude, but then we couldn’t argue.

Not to be a de-nihilist or anything…

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 07:48:54

the dude wouldn’t mind combo dropping in on a session of 10-pin, with no conditional conditions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz2ET5K6zY0

 
Comment by The Middling Lebowski
2008-10-20 09:09:51

Looks like the Big Lebowski stole my post. Pretty arbitrary, so I’ll go find another board. I’m outta here.

 
 
 
 
Comment by vozworth
2008-10-20 05:16:56

Backwardation

a “sellers” market

 
Comment by packman
2008-10-20 06:50:47

Guys - must we start this same argument every bits buckets thread? At least wait until later in the day when there is some useful information, so everyone doesn’t have to page through all this same stuff to get to the new information.

Proposal to Ben - how about a new informal rule - first few posts of each day have to be either:

A) Some kind of new information, e.g. a link to a current article on some actual housing or financial news, or

B) Discussion on said new information

In other words - the first post of the day shouldn’t be some clever wordplay on a constantly-rehashed argument.

I love this board - there is tons of good information and discussion here. However I have seen really good discussion boards completely ruined by the activity currently going on right now. It would be *really* nice for that not to happen to HBB.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 07:03:11

“If we value the pursuit of knowledge, we must be free to follow wherever that search may lead us. The free mind is not a barking dog, to be tethered on a ten-foot chain.”

Adlai E. Stevenson, Jr.

Comment by packman
2008-10-20 07:36:39

“True free-thinking intellectuals don’t need to regurgitate quotes from others who do their thinking for them.”

- Packman

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by exeter
2008-10-20 07:48:59

zingggggggggggggggggggggggg! ;)

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 07:50:27

I dig words well strung together, no matter who did the stringing and how long ago…

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2008-10-20 09:11:28

LOL :)

SanFranciscoBayAreaGal

 
Comment by DennisN
2008-10-20 10:34:28

So anyway I have a dumb question….

Is it a-lad-insane, or the more Arabic aladin-sane? And does he really walk around with a big blue genie to carry his gold?

 
Comment by exeter
2008-10-20 10:37:45

Gotta be the former.

 
Comment by Lesser Fool
2008-10-20 10:53:14

Must be the former, otherwise it’s a misspelling. It would be “Aladdin”.

 
Comment by Captwweedwacker
2008-10-20 14:14:43

I’ve always thought that the name was a David Bowie reference.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 15:11:21

the plot thickens…

 
Comment by Greg
2008-10-20 22:35:58

Who cares?

 
 
Comment by Mole Man
2008-10-20 08:34:09

This isn’t about knowledge, it’s about attempts at hoarding.

Having just read The Time Paradox: The New Psychology of Time That Will Change Your Life by Philip Zimbardo and John Boyd, I’d say the context from which this hoarding strategy emerges involves a combination of overemphasis of future and past negative points of view. The resulting perspective is unhealthy, irrational, and antisocial. One possible approach for addressing this would be to balance past negative thoughts about troubling difficulties with past positive thoughts about persistence over circumstance, and to balance worry about the future with engagement in the present. Another approach would be to embrace a Buddhist point of view where the self is diminished in importance and the future is reached in part by letting go of the past and accepting that history always rhymes but never really repeats.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-10-20 08:52:57

Yet another possible approach would to just drink some beer and relax. Some hoarded beer.

 
Comment by ella
2008-10-20 09:08:45

overemphasis of future and past negative points of view

also symptomatic of anxiety disorders: catastrophizing.

 
Comment by ella
2008-10-20 09:12:11

close italic closed?

 
 
 
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2008-10-20 07:09:47

How about a special “bits bucket” thread for debates about gold, and another one for partisan pot-shots about which political party is more responsible for the housing debacle.

Comment by yogurt
2008-10-20 07:29:40

Blaming the government of the day for something it had the full power to stop at any time is “partisan”? Is it “partisan” to demand any kind of accountability at all from those in power?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2008-10-20 07:42:58

“Is it “partisan” to demand any kind of accountability at all from those in power?”

Not at all. But as you probably know, there are three branches to our government, and there are (and have been all during the genesis and maturarion of the crisis) politicians of both parties in power.

Now I happen to think it’s been pretty amply demonstrated here that both parties have approximately equal responsibility for the housing debacle. But HBB’ers who are partisans of a particular party (which, in the interest of being non-partisan myself, I will not name) seem to have a particular interest in blaming the other side. Therefore I suggest a separate thread for these debates.

 
Comment by exeter
2008-10-20 07:43:00

The nutjobs keep trying the sanctimonious “we’re all responsible, therefore nobody is accountable” routine.

It ain’t gonna work.

 
Comment by packman
2008-10-20 07:43:24

It is when only a certain party is blamed, when both parties have been extensively shown to be at fault.

 
 
Comment by packman
2008-10-20 07:30:59

Actually - there is the HBB Forums that seem like it’d be a good place for that.

What say guys - can we take the inflation vs. deflation and gold vs. cash discussions there?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by packman
2008-10-20 07:52:42

The HBB Forums seems like an excellent place. That way there can be continuing discussion instead of re-starting the discussion each day.

What say guys - can we take the inflation vs. deflation and the gold vs. cash discussions there? Seems like the “Wall Street, Washington, and Personal Finance” board would be a good place.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by VirginiaTechDan
2008-10-20 09:50:43

It seems to me that rehashing debates in the context of new information is inevitable. The problem arises anytime someone (from either camp) makes a statement that is inconsistent with the 1st principles of someone in the opposite camp.

There is a pressing need to set the record straight for fear that not saying anything may lead more people astray.

It would be interesting to know what percent of traffic on this site is “regulars” and what percent are first time.

I would guess it is like church where they repeat the “salvation message” at least 3 times per month for the sake of the 5% of the congregation that happen to be visitors those weeks.

In my opinion you cannot make “rules” because the rules would be based on certain world views and they would limit debate. The partisans, gold bugs, inflationists, deflationists, etc all consistently provide opportunity to refine arguments and to challenge your world view.

Banning discussion of any topic that relates to profiting from (or avoiding loss) the housing bubble would probably do more harm than good. Besides, people may post less if they have to worry about whether or not it is “appropriate”.

I find the best way to limit posting on particular subjects it to ignore them and don’t reply. If no one is interested in the “debate” then it will stop.

 
 
Comment by az_lender
2008-10-20 08:16:50

Ben used to have a Money and Metals blog, but i guess we are all too accustomed to logging in here and too lazy to go there.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by ahansen
2008-10-20 08:51:33

Oh, c’mon Pack,

I drink my tea the same every morning, scan the same quick websites before I take my morning constitutional….

A small bit of consistency in a world gone mad is a reassuring thing. Like a warm-up round, or the prelude to the invocation.

Are you so enfeebled that it hurts your finger to scroll? If so, courage, my man. Courage.
That is all.

Comment by BanteringBear
2008-10-20 09:42:18

I agree…no whiners.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by taxmeupthebooty
2008-10-20 07:54:59

por que’ gold ?
are asian currencies a better bet ?

Comment by MEaston
2008-10-20 08:54:44

I disagree, keep the discussion here.
Inflation, the markets, interest rates, and politics are all tied to housing. Just skip past the sections that aren’t of interest.

 
 
 
Comment by jim
2008-10-20 05:00:15

So, stock market today: Dead cat bounce? Im still expecting one day where it hits its trading stops.

Comment by mrktMaven
2008-10-20 06:06:23

It looked like it turned down on Friday around 2:30 pm. Futures this morning say the markets are going to the moon. On the other hand, P&B speak early today and we know how the markets typically respond.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 06:27:41

The futures generally look bright when PPT members speak.

Comment by Kim
2008-10-20 08:16:32

Hasn’t anyone told Bernanke/Paulson/Bush that they have a negative effect on the market? They’re starting to give me the impression that they’d rather have their mug on camera while they’re still in office than play second fiddle to a market rally. I guess I’m bored because they’ve been giving practically the same speach for the past three weeks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2008-10-20 07:20:52

On the other hand, P&B speak early today and we know how the markets typically respond.

If only we had some government talking head with a last name starting with J.

It would remind everybody of the only type of sandwich they’ll be able to afford next month.

Comment by shizo
2008-10-20 07:35:36

poop? :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by desertdweller
2008-10-20 10:45:03

good one Brianinchicago!
PB and J?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Houstonstan
2008-10-20 08:47:56

What about it starting around wednesday ?

The indices are all in a decending triangle which channels the highs and the lows where they are converging into a point.

Once it breaks out of that, that will be the trend.

I’ve read some scary charts over the weekend suggesting a break to the downside has no natural resistance point. Scenario would be 600’s in S&P.

Comment by mrktMaven
2008-10-20 11:02:37

We’re certainly consolidating. I see a symmetrical triangle (pennant) with broader downward momentum; it could turn or head into the abyss. We’ll find out soon enough.

Comment by mrktMaven
2008-10-20 11:36:54

Telegraph:

The $54trillion credit derivatives market faces a delicate test as $360bn worth of contracts on now-defaulted derivatives on Lehman Brothers are due to be settled on Tuesday.

Bankers in the City and on Wall Street are bracing for yet another round of turbulence as the contracts are unwound.

The Bank of England and the Federal Reserve in America have said they will keep their special liquidity windows open late on Tuesday night to allow the contracts to settle.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by exeter
2008-10-20 05:03:27

NARscum just won’t let go will they?

Jed Smith, a researcher from industry group the National Association of Realtors, also saw a glimmer of hope in 2009, forecasting a modest 2.0-percent increase in prices nationally over next year.

http://business.inquirer.net/money/breakingnews/view/20081019-167252/US-house-prices-face-long-fall-to-bottom

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 05:45:22

They will go away, once internet competition finishes undercutting their 6 pct commissions to levels closer to 0 pct.

Comment by aNYCdj
2008-10-20 06:05:26

Bear:

Seriously why do we really need them anymore, unless its specialied sales.Just like travel agents.

With everything online, I’m very slowly starting to see people taking seriously the need to have a nice quick video and decent photographs.

So far the agents brokers or homeDebter arent coughing up a few hundred to present the house in the best light. But maybe without having to also pay 6% agents commissions people will finally get the message and pay a pro more for a nice vids and pictures
——————————————
They will go away, once internet competition finishes undercutting their 6 pct commissions to levels closer to 0 pct.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2008-10-20 07:07:19

“They will go away, once internet competition finishes undercutting their 6 pct commissions to levels closer to 0 pct.”

Not so. If the realtor really provides service, he/she will be around for as long as there are financial advisers, personal trainers, car-wash towelers, nail salon “technicians,” and all the other service providers.

And why do such people continue to exist? Because not everyone has the time or inclination or ability to do it themselves.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2008-10-20 09:03:14

You are correct Bill and I would like to add one more thought “Liability”….What you are really buying with a agent is insurance…At least in California, the potential liability for a Realtor is huge…That’s why you would always want to use #1 a Realtor that is associated with a large financially strong firm OR #2 a independent Realtor that is financially strong…Realtors are not going away although I would like to see their numbers halved at the least…

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-10-20 09:35:18

Dave….Insurance???????

what about demanding they PAY BACK all their commissions if the buyer defaults/foreclosure in the first year?

That would be a real agent killer.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-10-20 09:58:27

You are correct Bill and I would like to add one more thought “Liability”….

Isn’t that what title insurance is for?

 
Comment by realestateskeptic
2008-10-20 10:24:02

I know CA is different, but in the states I deal in MA and NY a realtor is an “agent” and as such unless they lie, they are not liable to the buyer. Even staying completely silent on a major fault is OK. Passing along lies of the Seller are OK. Also the forms all say they are not liable and just passing along the info….

Liability of Agent to Third Party

If the Agent has actual or apparent authority, the Agent will not have liability on any transactions agreed within the scope of that authority so long as the Principal was disclosed, i.e. the fact of the agency was revealed and the identity of the Principal revealed

 
Comment by desertdweller
2008-10-20 10:51:48

Agents are here to stay, just like travel agents- although halved- and there became to many agents in the first place during this bubble. Now the real lifers and serious agents will stay.

Their job is to sell. Other sales jobs in the world do the same thing but, aside from this bubble, hbbers dont’ bash those who sell other things. Some people are gifted sales persons, others are learning, some never get it.
But count on one thing for sure… we are all sales people. Don’t think so?
You sold yourself to get on a team, you sold yourself to get a date, get married, get a job, get a better deal, get friends to come over for dinner/drinks/parties.. the list goes on and on.
We all sold ourselves, our smarts, talent etc at one time or another and still do. If you are married, you sell yourself every single day in order to woo your loved one into loving you one more day. Or to get nooky.

 
Comment by scdave
2008-10-20 12:21:44

what about demanding they PAY BACK all their commissions if the buyer defaults/foreclosure in the first year?

aNYCdj…Not sure where you are going with this but if the service is provided then isn’t the commission due ?? As far as putting people into homes they connot afford that appears to be a ethics issiue if not a criminal one…Its the ease of entry into the business IMO that creates a enviorement for abuse…

Isn’t that what title insurance is for?

No…Title Ins., is primarly Ins., for the lender…

I know CA is different ??

You bet your a$$ it is…Most stringent in the Nation…

realtor is an “agent” and as such unless they lie, they are not liable to the buyer ??

Not so here….You have a Agency relationship with the buyer and a fiduciary duty also…Believe me, you have tons of exposure working with a buyer particularly if you have some higher standard of knowledge…Lets say, a extensive background in residential construction…

Even staying completely silent on a major fault is OK. Passing along lies of the Seller are OK ??

You are kidding right ?? That one will cost you 100k in damages or more and likely your license…

Also the forms all say they are not liable and just passing along the info ??

Not so if you have knowledge to the contrary OR have a reasonable capability of verifying the information…Just looking the other way don’t hunt…You would be lunch meat for some plaintiff lawyer…

Not legal advise just the way I see it here….

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-10-20 14:27:36

True but consider this a charge back, for defrauding the bank. But then anybody who touched the loan should pay back their fees commission too..its just the REagent is the highest paid stooge.

He could have said NO…but very very few did

—————————-
aNYCdj…Not sure where you are going with this but if the service is provided then isn’t the commission due ?

 
Comment by Greg
2008-10-20 22:46:49

aNYCdj,

In North Dakota, buyer agents also have a fiduciary duty to those whom they represent. In fact, they must report latent defects even if they are not disclosed by the seller but could have reasonably been determined or discovered by the agent.

Also, in general, I agree completely with Bill in Carolina and SCDave: there are real estate agents that provide a good service that other people don’t have the inclination to do themselves, so people will pay someone to do it for them.

The fact that there are bad real estate agents and good ones is no different from the fact that there are bad lawyers and good lawyers, bad doctors and good doctors, bad financial analysts and good financial analysts, etc.

 
 
Comment by ButImNotDeadYet
2008-10-20 07:15:39

Just like on-line mortgage applications? That didn’t work out too well did it? (or maybe it did — it worked well for the borrowers but not for the lenders)…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Blano
2008-10-20 06:37:37

“NARscum just won’t let go will they?”

They’re running ads for commercial RE now too, I see.

Comment by exeter
2008-10-20 07:19:03

Yeah.. Bloomberg WBBR runs that daily and it’s hilarious. “A commercial RE transaction is a complex process and you need a RealTard to ‘help’ you through it”. As I hear that particular blurb, I have to laugh given the amateur level of expertise of those RE agents I know. They know nothing of facilities management, architecture, construction etc. They know plenty of trumped up expressions and buzzwords though.

Comment by Blano
2008-10-20 08:08:24

I couldn’t believe it first time I heard it. Must be time for commerical RE to take a dive if it hasn’t already (seems like it is here).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2008-10-20 09:07:20

Must be time for commerical RE to take a dive ??

I don’t know about a dive but the down trend has already happened…

 
 
Comment by lanotary
2008-10-20 08:27:28

A lot of them also hire a transaction coordinator from the escrow company to coordinate the transaction because they don’t even know how to do that!! What is worse, they don’t pay for the T.C. out of their own pocket, the money is paid through escrow.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by scdave
2008-10-20 08:50:45

trumped up expressions and buzzwords though ??

And therein the problem…They are taught that if you say these words to people that they will give you their money…The problem in the real estate industry IMO is the “ease of entry”….Their are plenty of highly qualified real estate people…Unfortunatly, they are are surrounded by incompetence and the lack of ethics that hold the same license…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Greg
2008-10-20 22:51:02

scdave,

Couldn’t have said it better myself. Ease of entry is one huge part. Making it harder would eliminate most of the incompetent ones.

Actually penalizing the unethical would eliminate those with lack of ethics.

 
 
 
 
Comment by potential buyer
2008-10-20 09:48:47

According to 60 Minutes last night, Ken Lewis - CEO of BofA also gave that timeline!

 
 
Comment by Siggi Berlin
2008-10-20 05:13:56

“Events are moving with lightning speed as the global credit freeze evolves into something awfully like a classic trade-depression. ”

“The world stole prosperity from the future for year after year, with the full collusion of governments, regulators, and central banks. Now the future has arrived.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/3227361/Do-our-rulers-know-enough-to-avoid-a-1930s-replay.html

Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 05:37:54

“The world stole prosperity from the future for year after year, with the full collusion of governments, regulators, and central banks. Now the future has arrived.”

Welcome back to the future…

Comment by VirginiaTechDan
2008-10-20 05:56:13

Something tells me that $100 cokes may have been optimistic of the writers of Back to the Future II (2015).

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven
2008-10-20 05:47:11

It’s really comical when you juxtapose foreign press reports about what’s happening around the globe with the likes of CNBC. More from Ambrose:

From what I have been able to find out, shipping is slowing as fast as it did in the grim months of late 1931. “The crisis is now in full swing across the entire world,” said Giulio Tremonti, Italy’s finance minister. “It is hitting the real economy, the productive forces of industry. It’s global, it’s total, and it’s everywhere,” he said.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 06:13:57

CNBC making a typical announcement to American ‘investors’: “Stock futures are pointing to an upswing in the value of your portfolio.”

Rest of the world:

Baltic Dry drops 4.5% for 10th-straight decline
Monday, 20 October 2008 18:09

LONDON—The Baltic Dry index, a measure of shipping costs for commodities, fell for a 10th-consecutive trading session in London.

The index tracking transport costs on international trade routes dropped 68 points, or 4.5 percent, to 1,438, according to the Baltic Exchange. Rental costs for every class of vessel fell.

Rates are under “unwavering pressure” as tumbling steel prices curb demand for iron ore, the main ingredient in the alloy’s production, Omar Nokta, an analyst at Dahlman Rose Llc., said in a note to clients over the weekend.

Industrial Carriers Inc., a Marshall Islands-based company operating from Ukraine, became the first operator to collapse after a record 88-percent drop in the Baltic index since May 20. It filed for bankruptcy protection last week, Odessa-based official Michael Ivanov said by phone on Friday.

Losses some owners are making are “immense’’ and other companies will probably fail, Petter Narvestad, an analyst at Fondsfinans AS, said by phone. Marc Faber, who predicted the 1987 stock-market crash, said on October 13 a slowing global economy would lead to bankruptcies for owners.

 
Comment by Siggi Berlin
2008-10-20 06:31:55

Austria’s “der standard” talked to Walter Eichelburg:

“Most countries and banks will be bankrupt in mid-2009″

Eichelburg refers to a Kondratieff winter which begun in 2000 after the Kondratieff spring had begun in 1948 in Germany.

The article is in German only.
http://derstandard.at/?id=1224255921795

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-10-20 07:42:47

The Baltic Dry Index is an interesting indicator of fundamentals, as a sampling of cost to move the most basic of commodities around the globe. The index was not long ago at over $10,000. It peaked with commodity prices and has now plunged to $1,350. It is off 90%, which blasts us back to the 1980s at least. It is essentially saying we are going back to what was normal over the past century (and it is still headed down). Imagine prices of just about everything returning to their long term fundamentals!

In 1990 dollars, the 20th century long term price of oil was under $40/bbl, coffee $5/lb, corn 50c/lb, rice $1.20/lb, copper $1/lb and gold pretty steady throughout under $300/oz (1980 just looks like a candlestick on a century graph). A nice house for under $50K?

I know there are a thousand arguments for “it’s different here” but it looks like gravity is pulling everything back to norm.

Comment by nhz
2008-10-20 12:34:16

exactly, the plunge in the Baltic index is not the end of the world as Ambrose suggests, just some return to sanity.

For things which have a severe supply/demand imbalance (like the dollar on one side, and stuff like oil on the other side) I doubt we will ever return to ‘average’ 20th century valuations.

 
 
Comment by nhz
2008-10-20 12:28:16

after reading these Ambrose articles several times a week for some months, all with exactly the same message (bring rates down now, and Ben Bernanke is the Messiah) I get extremely bored as soon as I see his name above an article. Always full of BS arguments and out-of-context information that promises financial destruction if rates are not brought down to zero, NOW!

Oh yeah, and Ambrose himself is the god of economic journalism, no doubt about it.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 05:17:02

Hedge funds in grip of vicious selling cycle
By Henny Sender in New York
Published: October 17 2008 03:00 | Last updated: October 17 2008 03:00

Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2008-10-20 06:42:10

“The last quarter has been abysmal,” Mr Singh said. “We clearly underestimated the potential damage to us from chaotic moves elsewhere.”

In the background…”gates” being slammed shut…then, suddenly…it went dark! ;-)

“The problems in the sector have set in motion a vicious cycle in the markets as hedge funds sell holdings to return money to worried investors, triggering further price declines and prompting more withdrawals.”

I guess it ’s just too hard to get readers to understand what is meant by “The Domino Effect” ;-)

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 05:18:10

Hedge fund king bows out with blistering rant on ‘idiot’ bankers
By James Mackintosh
Published: October 18 2008 03:00 | Last updated: October 18 2008 03:00

A hedge fund manager who made what is thought to be one of the biggest percentage profits of all time bowed out of the business yesterday with a fierce attack on the “idiots” running big banks who were willing to take the other side of his bets.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 05:36:08

I like his style, a stylish stoner’s lament.

Smoke em’, if you’ve got em’ by the balls…

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-10-20 06:12:41

Finally Maybe that Harvard Stanford MBA will not be worth the money to waste on getting it anymore..enrollment drops 75% schools close up….Its disgraceful all the Damage to America these supposedly smart people have done….

———-
“All of this behaviour supporting the aristocracy only ended up making it easier for me to find people stupid enough to take the other side of my trades. God bless America.”

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-10-20 07:01:40

“Its disgraceful all the Damage to America these supposedly smart people have done…”

The mythology that surrounds higher education in this country is really something to behold. In all the jobs I ever held I never saw so much shameless azz-kissing as I did when attending academic conferences as part of grad school.

‘Merikuns are mesmerized by the “educated” and the institutions that produce them. Fifteen years ago I remember reading in our local paper that for many parents in Chicago’s northwest suburbs (relatively wealthy areas) there was more shame in having a child not go away to college than there was in having to admit their kid was a druggie.

To the masses who keep on looking to “educated” individuals for magic solutions, whether those individuals be billionaires, politicians, or eloquent speakers: thanks a bunch - this mess is YOUR fault.

Comment by InMontana
2008-10-20 08:29:50

Last night ABC News had a thumb-sucker about how a poor middle class girl won’t be able to afford to attend one of the 10 elite colleges she want to apply to, because her parents’ portfolio had “lost” 100k or so. Poooor baby.

This was after the story on the lawn bowlers in Florida who were worried because their portfolios had “lost” 100k. Turns out only a few actually “lost” money - the greedy ones who had left it in equities of course.

Cry me a friggin river.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-10-20 08:34:27

‘Merikuns are mesmerized by the “educated” and the institutions that produce them.

YMMV. There are many demographics that view formal education with contempt.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Kim
2008-10-20 08:46:05

“Fifteen years ago I remember reading in our local paper that for many parents in Chicago’s northwest suburbs (relatively wealthy areas) there was more shame in having a child not go away to college than there was in having to admit their kid was a druggie.”

Its still happening that way. I think. Alas, the state just cut major funding for some local family counseling centers that served the junior drug addicts and wrist cutters in that area. This happened as moms and dads are losing their health insurance and their HELOCs dried up.

The highly-rated public schools are the crown jewel of this area, which went a long way in falsely propping up area real estate valuations. I expect the schools will eventually suffer some in this economy, and will have a difficut time maintaing their reputations going forward.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by MEaston
2008-10-20 09:31:38

That being said, I’ll take anyone with a technical degree over a non college grad or non technical/science degree other things being equal. The technical degree does confirm that the person is able to work hard and finish projects.

“Its disgraceful all the Damage to America these supposedly smart people have done…”

The damage was not inspite of their intelligence, the people responsible for this used their intelligence to strip wealth. Now there is no wealth left only debt. The pawns in this game are guilty of being shortsighted, greedy and lazy. This has nothing to do with their college education.

“To the masses who keep on looking to “educated” individuals for magic solutions” It’s our fault

Again why target the educated here, do you really think high school drop outs would do better?? I agree education is no guarantee of success, and people should not look for magic solutions from anyone educated or non educated (ie religious) but should educate themselves and work to get their leaders and fellow citizens to behave responsibly.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-10-20 09:44:27

You are right the people i meet today are so clueless and have no critical thinking skills..just like those vastly overpaid Harvard Stanford MBA’S

Thinking out of the box is not a highly valued skill in America anymore, but it is EXACTLY the skill we need in millions of Americans to kick start this economy back on track.

——————————————
The damage was not inspite of their intelligence, the people responsible for this used their intelligence to strip wealth.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-10-20 10:16:11

Thinking out of the box is not a highly valued skill in America anymore

Amen! Corporations just want mediocre people, who are already “trained” to do the job, who will work long hours (unpaid overtime) for cheap.

I have seen this even in the technical trades. Its not problem solving skills that are in demand. The qualifications almost always are:

Are you doing something very, very similar to what we do in your current job?
Are you very, very familiar with the tools we use?

I have come to the conclusion that techies are considered to be little more than the digital equivalent of plumbers, electricians or car mechanics (except they aren’t paid as well).

At my previous job I agreed to interview candidates to backfill my position. I included a problem solving section in the process. Needless to say, candidates became very indignant when confronted with something unfamiliar, many even complained that problem solving had nothing to do with the job (guess who didn’t get hired). This after explaining to them that there was no “right” answer to the problem, that we just wanted to see how they approached problem solving.

I even had HR try to twist my arm to stop doing that. Funny thing though, the guy we hired (who aced problem solving) turned out to be great. I never heard a peep from HR thanking me for weeding out the losers.

 
Comment by Neil
2008-10-20 10:34:00

That being said, I’ll take anyone with a technical degree over a non college grad or non technical/science degree other things being equal. The technical degree does confirm that the person is able to work hard and finish projects.

Yep. They can actually solve word problems. Then again, I’m in engineering. Non-degreed engineers with skills are of value. But its the creativity through education we need to develop new products.

Time for the hedge fund bandits to go BK. Time for education to be used for skills and not plundering. You do realize, excluding the MBA, education has had no value the last five years as a Realtor ™ or mortgage broker could make more money?

Let’s put it this way, who wants to go to a doctor without an MD? ;) The issue is the surplus of ’soft degrees.’

Got Popcorn?
Neil

 
Comment by Azrenter
2008-10-20 11:37:05

Like a VP with a journalism BA?

 
Comment by VaBeyatch in Virginia Beach
2008-10-20 12:28:56

Hah! Which is funny, because having no degree, and being technical I can think of a few cases where I worked next to people who had degrees from good schools. Their view was they had a college degree so they shouldn’t have to do much of the actual work. They should be able to hire out to get it all done, or have more employees brought in to work under them to do all of the work. These weren’t management. I’ll never forget another coworker who asked him, “you’re the one with the technical degree, and VaBeyatch is the one with all the crazy personal technical projects…” and his response was that he pretty much just wants to get paid and party with chicks or something.

 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-10-20 13:06:47

You do realize, excluding the MBA, education has had no value the last five years as a Realtor ™ or mortgage broker could make more money?

Why bust your hump earning a tough degree, just to get stuck in a cubicle farm, with minuscule to non existant payraises, being demanded to work plenty of unpaid overtime, with the layoff guillotine blade always dangling overhead?

I suspect that at the peak of the bubble that only people in college were those who were there to party like there was no tomorrow.

 
Comment by Cassandra
2008-10-20 13:46:44

Like a Nobel prize winning global warming expert (Al Gore) with a degree in “govenment”, who invented the internet?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 05:22:03

Monday, October 20, 2008
The bailout is not the end of capitalism

Renita Jablonski: So this morning, a bailout in Asia — of course, a fraction of what we’re spending in the U.S. As part of the plan here, the Treasury is pouring $125 billion into the nine biggest banks in the country.

It’s still hard to know what to make of these moves, let alone how to characterize them. Time for Fortune Magazine’s Allan Sloan to weigh in. What do you think, Allan?

Allan Sloan: Well, I think no one has seen anything like this ever, so people are making up it as they go. And I hear that sometime next month, there’s a presidential vote in the United States, is this true?

Jablonski: Ah you know what, I think that’s coming up here, yeah.

Sloan: Right. So with all of this, things have to be reduced to a soundbyte. So it’s nationalization — the end of capitalism as we know it. And just realizing that people are doing the best they can and have no idea what to do, that all disappears and everyone races to put a brand on it and then shriek.

Jablonski: And so what are you doing in this case? Is this the end of capitalism the way you look at it?

Sloan: No, it’s not even remotely the end of capitalism. If you look at the terms of the investment the government is making in these nine banks, boy, I would kill for somebody to give me that much money and exert so little control over my life. I mean, if Paulson has got $100 billion looking for a home, I mean I’m there.

 
Comment by wmbz
2008-10-20 05:31:31

Thought for the Day:
“I think Congressmen should wear uniforms like NASCAR drivers so we could identify their corporate sponsors.”

Comment by takingbets
2008-10-20 06:00:20

LOL!!! Is it to late to get it put on the ballot?

 
Comment by pressboardbox
2008-10-20 06:11:36

Yes! And they should be made to switch hats (of sponsors) every few seconds while speaking in public while beginning all speeches with “I’d like to thank Phillip Morris, Exxon- Mobil, Goldman-Sachs, Intel, K-Y jelly… I couldn’t have done it without them…”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 06:17:54

Those who voted for the bailout should wear scarlet letters so we can see who has been sleeping around with big FIRE business lobbyists.

 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 06:30:38

“I think Congressmen should wear uniforms like NASCAR drivers so we could identify their corporate sponsors.”

I wonder which Congressman is wearing Larry Yun’s uniform?

He’s easy to spot in races, as he’s always behind the curve in his predictions past or present, in the NARSCAR…

 
Comment by Wheatie
2008-10-20 06:44:37

Nice one! I am glad I came back today to read this. My day is complete.

 
Comment by hd74man
2008-10-20 07:19:47

RE: “I think Congressmen should wear uniforms like NASCAR drivers so we could identify their corporate sponsors.”

You can start with a “DCI” logo.

http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2008/10/20/freddie_mac_paid_2m_to_thwart_regulation

 
Comment by packman
2008-10-20 07:49:43

Here’s a really good site giving lots of info on corporate sponsorship:

http://www.opensecrets.org/

 
Comment by Kim
2008-10-20 08:49:26

Wonderful idea!!

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2008-10-20 08:56:22

“I think Congressmen should wear uniforms like NASCAR drivers so we could identify their corporate sponsors.”

You are a freakin’ genious, clearly.

 
Comment by packman
2008-10-20 09:23:44

See opensecrets dot org for good info actually.

(Tried posting a link, but those get eaten and not spit out for hours)

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 05:32:47

Greater urgency needs to be shown in sorting out guarantees for the banking system or cash will start to dry up by Christmas, National leader John Key said today.

He said yesterday a bipartisan approach was needed to extend the Government’s retail bank deposit guarantee scheme to cover wholesale bank deposits.

The Government has guaranteed retail loans in the face of the international financial crisis, creating a $150 billion contingent liability.

Under a wholesale scheme, the government would guarantee money loaned to New Zealand banks by foreign banks, a scheme being established in Australia and in place in other countries.

That would extend the contingent liability to $450 billion.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz-election-2008/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501799&objectid=10538511
===================================================

To put things in perspective about how badly New Zealand’s tit is stuck in the ringer, thanks to the carry-trade…

There are 4 million people in the land of long white cloud, and their banking system requires $450 Billion NZ, which would be like our banking system needing a U.S. $20 Trillion guarantee.

tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick

Comment by combotechie
2008-10-20 06:11:50

“… or cash will start to dry up by Christmas.”

Cash rules.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 06:18:33

Cash will seem more like king cobra, as in you’ll want to spend it as quick as possible, as it’s buying power loses potent, see?

Comment by combotechie
2008-10-20 06:28:23

“… as its buying power loses potent…”

Lol. Is that what you see happening all around you?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 06:38:49

Of all natural phenomenon, earthquakes probably most closely resemble seismic shifts financially.

There are always feint pre-shocks before the main event happens, so faint that most people can’t discern right from wrong, and once that happens, things tend to get shook up, the debt buried in a mass communal grave.

 
Comment by combotechie
2008-10-20 06:47:39

“…the debt buried in a mass communal grave.”

The death of such debt takes cash with it, leaving the surviving cash with more buying power.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-10-20 09:17:03

“feint pre-shocks”

I think you got it right that time.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-10-20 10:54:39

Cash will seem more like king cobra, as in you’ll want to spend it as quick as possible, as it’s buying power loses potent, see?

This was the situaton in Mexico during the late 70’s and 80’s, when big inflation was King. If you got your mittens on some cash (say the annual mandatory Xmas bonus or the mandatory profit sharing) you disposed of it ASAP. Buy the kids new clothes, go to Acapulco for a few days, stock up on some booze (Presidente by the case) or if you could find any for sale, Centenarios:

http://www.banxico.org.mx/nProductosNumismatica/aMonedasMetalesFinos/MonedasOro/FamiliaCentenario/frFamiliaCentenario.html

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by scdave
2008-10-20 09:25:25

Cash rules ?? Yep…

 
 
Comment by nhz
2008-10-20 12:41:53

I read some (Dutch language) KIWI websites and the Kiwi don’t seem to be very impressed with the situation, to say the least. I know the ‘no worry mate’ attititude in Oz, but it seems the Kiwi’s aren’t much different …

I get the impression that many of these governments are making guarantees that are totally impossible, to it is probably a matter of who blinks first …

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 05:35:20

Next month, don’t forget to punish your elected officials who supported the bailout. Unfortunately both presidential candidates supported it, so there is no choice in that case.

P.S. Don’t get mislead by the prototypically mendacious title of the bailout bill:

“To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide earnings assistance and tax relief to members of the uniformed services, volunteer firefighters, and Peace Corps volunteers, and for other purposes”

Comment by Carlos Cisco
2008-10-20 18:40:07

Just did mine today! Dont even remember the name of her opponent. Could care less!! Let the punishment fit the crime…I sez.

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-10-20 20:21:45

Hehe, thanks.

I wanted to respond to someone yesterday who asked, was the congressional call-in ratio really 10:1 against?

I’m surprised it wasn’t 20:1 or 50:1 against.
Who (besides the Wall Street calling tree someone tried to get started: no douybt like herding cats, that idea) would actually bother to call in and say:

I’ve read the (453?) pages of the “To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide earnings assistance and tax relief to members of the uniformed services, volunteer firefighters, and Peace Corps volunteers, and for other purposes”, and I want to thank you for supporting this pork laden mislabeled thing so the world doesn’t end. Good Job, Congressman Bob! You’ve got my vote next month!

 
 
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2008-10-20 05:36:51

My wife enjoys mindlessly flipping through women’s magazines after a long brain-draining day at work. She has 3 or 4 subscriptions which are practically free if you ignore the renewal notices until they get desperate to keep their subscription numbers up.

Anyway, she received two of them in the mail on Saturday. They always have a list of featured articles on the cover… One of them, in the article that takes up the most cover real estate, says “Live Rich Without Getting a Raise: 14 ways to save money and still have fun.” The other one, in a smaller font, says “Recession-Proof Beauty: 24 Products for under $10 (They only look rich)”

Frugal is getting fashionable…

Comment by ella
2008-10-20 16:35:46

frugal is fashionable…

it’s been coming on for a little while. break out your best plaid flannel shirt and tie it around your waist. put your mudhoney cassette back in the boom-box. whip up a honey + sugar facial scrub. 1993 is back. Now where’d I put those Sassy’s ?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 05:40:43

Now it is the voter’s turn to deliver some payback. Be sure you let your elected representative know next month how you feel about them selling you out to big FIRE business interests.

Business hits back after Congress bailout vote
Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:33pm EDT
By Kevin Drawbaugh

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Business lobbyists scolded the U.S. Congress and threatened political payback after lawmakers handed the financial services industry a stunning defeat by killing a $700-billion Wall Street bailout.

The vote Monday in the House of Representatives to reject the rescue plan, proposed by the Bush administration September 20 and modified by congressional leaders over the past week, came as a rude shock to powerful and deeply entrenched interests.

Major banks and executives from the financial sector overall donate heavily to political campaigns and spend a lot of money on government lobbying to push their agenda.

The titans of high finance don’t always get their way on Capitol Hill, but the 228-205 House vote was unexpected and drew a flurry of private sector counter-punches.

 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-10-20 05:46:31


As Commidities Bust continues…


Copper Prices Have Collapsed in North America by a Factor of 5,000+ in 400 years

I have a close friend (we meet and talk frequently) who is unabashed bull on copper despite huge swings in copper prices and demand, historically. His thesis rests on the New Era argument of globalization and secular demand so common among bulls. My friend cannot even imagine a recession, let alone depression, in China and India, any time soon, which to me is a given. When that happens the demand will fall in America, China, Europe, India, etc, more or less simultaneously. Adjusted for inflation copper prices are below where they were in 1900 and at the recent high they were where they were in 1907! Production since 1800 has grown exponentially except for few drops during demand slumps. I expect copper to go down to $0.50-1.00/lb range, if not lower. Anyway, I found this gem:

“Thirty years later [around 1615], Jamestown’s John Smith noted that, “for a copper kettle. . . [the Powhatans] will sell you a whole Countrey””

“for as much red copper [in 1605] as I can bring [to North America] I’ll have thrice the weight in gold”

Commodities bulls have a blinder – no global recession, let alone global depression. We shall find that out soon enough in about a year.

Jas

Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 05:49:04

I’m plenty scared about my Copper position…

Like most of you, i’ve got maybe $6 or $7 in pennies kicking around.

Comment by VirginiaTechDan
2008-10-20 06:01:42

Unless those are pre-1982 pennies, you really have a zinc position.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 06:04:07

I zinc so.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Gulfstreamfixer
2008-10-20 09:05:23

I realized my life had no meaning when I spent an evening sorting my pre- and post-1982 pennies. :)

On the other hand, you could say I have diversified my portfolio

 
Comment by VirginiaTechDan
2008-10-20 09:52:56

A quick way to make money is to stamp holes in pennies to turn them into coper washers. Easily double or triple your money and it doesn’t involve melting down the coin.

 
 
 
Comment by realestateskeptic
2008-10-20 06:05:46

I have never understood copper. As a PM, it is too bulky and not precious/expensive enough and as an industrial metal, it is too closely tied to housing and the electrical and plumbing industries for my taste. Seems like a perfectly terrible storm for Copper. As much as it has already fallen, it seems much pain is still ahead . . . .

Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 06:09:55

“If you saw Atlas, the giant who holds the world on his shoulders, if you saw that he stood, blood running down his chest, his knees buckling, his arms trembling but still trying to hold the world aloft with the last of his strength, and the greater the effort the heavier the world bore down upon his shoulders — what would you tell him to do? I don’t know. What could he do? What would you tell him? To shrug.”

Francisco d’Anconia, proprietor of d’Anconia Copper

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by hoz
2008-10-20 06:20:39

“Adjusted for inflation copper prices are below where they were in 1900 and at the recent high they were where they were in 1907!”

Adjusted for inflation the dollar is worth almost 5% of what it was in 1900.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-10-20 09:26:30

Right, so if you make your production processes more efficient than that over those 108 years, and find new reserves, the inflation-adjusted price can be lower than in 1900.

Same as in computers and gee-gaws where the innovation cycle is much much faster than inflation leading to falling prices.

 
 
Comment by hd74man
2008-10-20 07:43:11

RE: As Commidities Bust continues…

This weekend I learned from a friend who markets wood from his own acreage, that there is enormous amount of dead Douglas fir (caused by beetle infestation) from the Northwest which MUST come onto the market over the next 2 years.

If it suits your style, it sure looks like a good time to put up that small retirement home paid for in cash.

However, if you have to unload a McMansion first, I’d say you are SOL.

Comment by Olympiagal
2008-10-20 09:04:52

hd, I’m going to dig out my data on WA forest products– it’s in this giant paper pile somewhere– to support your post.
I’ll certainly agree with you that lumber is not looking so great.

Comment by hd74man
2008-10-20 10:17:06

RE: I’ll certainly agree with you that lumber is not looking so great.

Residential construction should always be done against the biz cycle when trademen are desperate for work and the cost of building materials are crashing.

Just have sufficient cash up front and deal with an honest lending institution.

Like this is rocket science.

The lemmings never get it right.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Greg
2008-10-20 23:02:03

Talked to a homebuilder here in western North Dakota (where the economy is actually growing slightly because of oil businesses moving in, an expanding Air Force base, and agriculture). I asked him if he was seeing a decrease in prices of materials and he said that actually costs have been increasing, because so many plants have been shutting down nationwide that produce what the builders need from the raw materials.

 
 
 
Comment by AK-LA
2008-10-20 18:30:04

Also some British Columbian (soon Albertan) lodgepole pine. Incredible beetle kills there the past few years, mostly on timber company land. They may just chip it to keep prices up, if it doesn’t burn first.

 
 
Comment by Kim
2008-10-20 08:55:51

Does this mean the FBs can quit stripping the pipes out of the houses they’re abandoning?

Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 09:02:37

Nope, they need to steal twice as much just to keep up their life of crime.

 
Comment by BanteringBear
2008-10-20 12:18:11

FB’s? More like meth heads. They’re the real perpetrators of this sort of thing. They’re sub-human monsters, that group.

Comment by ella
2008-10-20 16:52:36

They are scary. I saw one stab a gingko tree :( (well he was acting meth-y, I didn’t go up to him and ask, being smaller than the tree. It could have been generalized madness disorder). Anyway, it’s a real problem. It would help if our local newspaper didn’t explain how to make it when they do their annual exposé about the dangers of crystal meth.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by In Raleigh
2008-10-20 05:54:40

ING is getting a $13.5 billion bailout from the Dutch government. With all these banks getting bailed out, where are we supposed to keep our money? We used ING Direct for almost five years and they paid a great interest rate.

One positive…one of the higher-ups in ING is foregoing his bonus this year.

Comment by Siggi Berlin
2008-10-20 06:35:06

AFAIK, ING was the last major Dutch bank that had not been nationalised.

Comment by MazNJ
2008-10-20 07:43:56

ING and ING Direct, while related, are seperate if I remember correctly.

Comment by nhz
2008-10-20 13:25:00

ING Direct is owned by ING, and ING’s woes are mostly the result of losses at their US division (mortgage losses on AltA loans, if I understand well ING has to reinvest all their ING Direct gains in the US market). They will go down together if things go wrong, no doubt about it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by nhz
2008-10-20 13:21:13

no not really, although it is starting to look a bit like that.

only ABNAMRO/Fortis was nationalised up to now, and I don’t think others will follow.

One of the other big banks is Rabobank (internationally a small player I guess). They have AAA credit rating and are solid, probably one of the most solid banks in the world - as long as the Dutch housing bubble does not burst. They have a lot of their money in the Dutch mortgage market, so there was no need to play with toxic US mortgage paper.

 
 
Comment by realestateskeptic
2008-10-20 08:08:57

On the bright side, they have my $500k term life insurance policy and it looks like no US $$$ is involved so this is the first bailout I wholeheartedly support!!!

 
Comment by nhz
2008-10-20 13:30:44

the Dutch government is organising another version of the musical chairs game: first Dutch savers flee Fortis, so Fortis gets nationalised and savers now flock to Fortis/ABNAMRO and withdraw their money from ING that is rumoured to be in trouble (which was evident for months if you looked at their stockchart).

Then there was the little distraction with Icesave (costing the Dutch taxpayer loads of money) and the government had to increase the deposit insurance from 20K to 100K euro.

Now ING gets 10 billion of free taxpayer money (in return two gov. burocrats wll be looking over the banksters shoulders to check what they are doing with the money) and offers savers a higher savings rate, so savers flock back to ING. Just guessing which other bank will run into trouble now after the flash capital gets moving again …

it sure keeps people interested in the financial markets, where to park your savings is becoming an acceptable topic for conversation.

 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 05:55:24

Say, @ what point do homeowners emulate countries, and start to ‘guarantee’ their mortgages?

Comment by VirginiaTechDan
2008-10-20 06:07:30

Well, your “representatives” already has homeowners (aka tax payers) guaranteeing their own mortgages.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-10-20 07:50:10

Think “community”. Your neighbor with a job guarantees all the mortgages on the block.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 05:56:24

Wall Street Journal
* THE WEEKEND INTERVIEW
* OCTOBER 18, 2008
Anna Schwartz
Bernanke Is Fighting the Last War
‘Everything works much better when wrong decisions are punished and good decisions make you rich.’
By BRIAN M. CARNEY

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has called the 888-page “Monetary History” “the leading and most persuasive explanation of the worst economic disaster in American history.” Ms. Schwartz thinks that our central bankers and our Treasury Department are getting it wrong again.

To understand why, one first has to understand the nature of the current “credit market disturbance,” as Ms. Schwartz delicately calls it. We now hear almost every day that banks will not lend to each other, or will do so only at punitive interest rates. Credit spreads — the difference between what it costs the government to borrow and what private-sector borrowers must pay — are at historic highs.

This is not due to a lack of money available to lend, Ms. Schwartz says, but to a lack of faith in the ability of borrowers to repay their debts. “The Fed,” she argues, “has gone about as if the problem is a shortage of liquidity. That is not the basic problem. The basic problem for the markets is that [uncertainty] that the balance sheets of financial firms are credible.”

So even though the Fed has flooded the credit markets with cash, spreads haven’t budged because banks don’t know who is still solvent and who is not. This uncertainty, says Ms. Schwartz, is “the basic problem in the credit market. Lending freezes up when lenders are uncertain that would-be borrowers have the resources to repay them. So to assume that the whole problem is inadequate liquidity bypasses the real issue.”

“Why are they ‘toxic’?” Ms. Schwartz asks. “They’re toxic because you cannot sell them, you don’t know what they’re worth, your balance sheet is not credible and the whole market freezes up. We don’t know whom to lend to because we don’t know who is sound. So if you could get rid of them, that would be an improvement.” The only way to “get rid of them” is to sell them, which is why Ms. Schwartz thought that Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson’s original proposal to buy these assets from the banks was “a step in the right direction.”

The problem with that idea was, and is, how to price “toxic” assets that nobody wants. And lurking beneath that problem is another, stickier problem: If they are priced at current market levels, selling them would be a recipe for instant insolvency at many institutions. The fears that are locking up the credit markets would be realized, and a number of banks would probably fail.

Ms. Schwartz won’t say so, but this is the dirty little secret that led Secretary Paulson to shift from buying bank assets to recapitalizing them directly, as the Treasury did this week. But in doing so, he’s shifted from trying to save the banking system to trying to save banks. These are not, Ms. Schwartz argues, the same thing. In fact, by keeping otherwise insolvent banks afloat, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury have actually prolonged the crisis. “They should not be recapitalizing firms that should be shut down.”

Rather, “firms that made wrong decisions should fail,” she says bluntly. “You shouldn’t rescue them. And once that’s established as a principle, I think the market recognizes that it makes sense. Everything works much better when wrong decisions are punished and good decisions make you rich.” The trouble is, “that’s not the way the world has been going in recent years.”

Comment by hoz
2008-10-20 06:27:26

Ms. Schwartz is correct. It is a matter of solvency.

The problem for the US as opposed to many other countries is corporate debt suggests as many as 25% of the companies are insolvent.

Do we let the companies fold? I don’t think so. As long as mopes are willing to buy US Treasuries, then the US should continue to bail the companies out.

Does anybody expect the US to be able to pay off its debt? ‘Tis the greatest Ponzi scheme of all.

Comment by Jon
2008-10-20 10:42:34

All of the insolvent companies and banks have a ton of good assets, just burdened down with too much debt. If you just let them fold, you have a great depression which isn’t worth the cure. It would be better to be able to bankrupt and restart a company incredibly quickly, just unloading the debt. Neither a borrower nor a lender be…

 
 
Comment by In Montana
2008-10-20 06:29:53

TED is dropping..

Comment by mrktMaven
2008-10-20 06:37:58

It’s the debt. What are they going to do with it? There is too much of it. The world is gagging on it.

Oct. 20 (Bloomberg) — The cost of protecting European corporate bonds from default rose to a record amid investor concern bankruptcies will soar as Deutsche Bank AG analysts forecast the worst economic slump since the Great Depression.

 
 
Comment by hd74man
2008-10-20 07:46:13

RE: “Why are they ‘toxic’?” Ms. Schwartz asks. “They’re toxic because you cannot sell them, you don’t know what they’re worth, your balance sheet is not credible and the whole market freezes up. We don’t know whom to lend to because we don’t know who is sound.

Liars, liars, your pant’s are all on fire!

Idiots…

Comment by WhatOnceWas
2008-10-20 08:14:52

I wonder what the anecdotal indicators look like if/when overseas US$ holders were quietly getting out of their positions? The dollar is steadily climbing, and understand we have the best of the worse situation now, but at what point does one party (Russia) run for the exit?….and what would be the stealth indicators be?

 
 
 
Comment by pressboardbox
2008-10-20 06:02:30

Just got back from rural NC. Just about every commercial business/building/property on the main highway (74) has a for sale sign. That area always looks depressed but now is going on desperate. Beautiful fall up there though.

Comment by Lane from s.c.
2008-10-20 06:36:30

You must have been visiting Lake Lure. We are going to be in for a hurting here the carolinas. Most people thought it could not happen here.

Lane

Comment by Blano
2008-10-20 06:43:22

Hopefully things will have turned around a bit when I show up there in a few years. :)

 
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven
2008-10-20 06:13:28

“We cannot continue along the same lines because the same problems will trigger the same disasters. This sort of capitalism is a betrayal of the sort of capitalism we believe in.”

French President Nicolas Sarkozy

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 06:15:52

We are in big trouble when the French President provides better support for capitalistic ideals than the titans of Wall Street.

Comment by mrktMaven
2008-10-20 06:30:40

What does he mean by “betrayal?”

Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 06:52:43

The world outside our borders is plenty pissed off at us, as every politician finds it increasingly easy to blame their problems on us, because we were first to fall apart, and their distaste of ’ssshrubery’s magnificent 7 years might have been a contributing factor, as well.

We’ve so severed ties with our peers in the past 8 years, that now we are repaid in jeers, i.e. “betrayal”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by salinasron
2008-10-20 10:23:15

“The world outside our borders is plenty pissed off at us”

It’s time for a good stiff drink!! I get soooooo pissed off at all the dunderheads worried about how the world sees us. The foreign press has the same agendas as the American press and most populations just ape the local press.

I don’t know about you but I could care less about what or how someone thinks about me. Life is too short, and I’m not living mine to please others.

 
Comment by ella
2008-10-20 11:26:30

Well, I don’t think that’s what Sarkozy meant anyway.

In the first place, French people just like dramatic words, like “betrayal.” It’s their way.

Secondly, the current market (multinational corporations, etc.) is largely seen, globally, as an American style of capitalism. I know it’s more complicated than that, but, I’m just saying ‘in a nutshell’ sort of way. The rules of the game just got changed, very quickly, right? That’s the “betrayal” part. Not so different from the outrage that was all over the boards here.

Thirdly, Europeans are generally more in touch with various socialist scenarios (ie different forms of socialist government) because they have a wider range of politicians and political parties, including even fascist & marxist, actively involved in government. I think their experience of this haphazard nationalization is part of a larger discussion about Americanization, and if it works, etc. On a less ideological note, American mortgages are freaking everyone out.

Fourthly, you may not care about what the world thinks of America, but you may not have considered tha alternative. Between 2003-ish and 2007 I noticed that, in my little corner of the world, discussion about “America” dropped off the radar. If someone mentioned George Bush you could hear a pin drop, because there was nothing left to say. It was the first time in my life that America seemed to be no longer at the centre of things. My friends started emigrating to Berlin & London (even Brazil) instead of New York and California and vacations in the US fell out of fashion, too. I was amazed at how quickly sentiment changed. I’m not saying America fell off the map, just that other parts of the world started vying for time and attention in a more serious way.

Eyes are back on America right now, there’s so much going on, but I wouldn’t take your cutural power (financial and otherwise) for granted. I would fear lack of attention more than so-called jeers - in the traditon of all press is good press - though it may be unimaginable to you. On the other hand, you might prefer not to function as an empire. I mean, it seems exhausting and it is quite expensive.

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-10-20 20:30:53

I’d look at long term trends before immigrating anywhere in old Europe. One might still be around when France becomes the second or third Islamic nuclear power.

 
 
Comment by tresho
2008-10-20 13:49:38

What does he mean by “betrayal?” Perhaps this? Sarkozy’s bank account hacked by thieves

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-10-20 20:34:16

My wife doesn’t like my 20 character random passwords for internet sites. They are too hard to write down into her unencrypted Book Of All Passwords One Stop Shop For Identity Thieves ;)

 
 
 
 
Comment by exeter
2008-10-20 06:23:33

This “sort of capitalism” is called fascism. It’s about time those with a podium start using the word. We won’t get back to capitalism until business is subservient to government, i.e, we the people….. instead of the reverse.

Comment by MEaston
2008-10-20 09:47:09

I was making this point last night.
The news keeps calling in socialism.
It is not socialism.
Look at the bailout bill. The average citizen was against it. The financial companies and banks then turned on the money to get the bill past, threatening politicians and funding groups to support the plan.

The bill does not give the government any control over these companies, if it did it would make them stop paying dividends.

So this is government being controlled by business not government owning portions of the economy to ensure that monopolies and market manipulators can’t strangle the economy.

Comment by exeter
2008-10-20 11:00:10

But we the people have been duped and are stupid. There were no “problems” and the economy was “roaring”……. until the big guys began losing $$$$$$ and all of a sudden Bush proposes a bailout at our expense. It’s a fascist/corporatist fraud.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by VirginiaTechDan
2008-10-20 10:16:50

“we the people” is a myth, there are only individuals. And I do not want to be “subservient” to “the mob” whether they be organized crime (government/mafia) or people with pitchforks 50% of whom have below average intelligence led by 1% of the people who are smart enough and immoral enough to manipulate the bottom 50% for their benefit at the expense of the smarter 49% of the population that just wants to be left alone.

Comment by Cosgrove
2008-10-20 10:37:38

“we the people” is a myth, there are only individuals.”

And then there are fictional individuals and entities that act like individuals, like corporations and institutions. Individuals are at the bottom of it, but these so-called individuals are easily herded and subsumed into groups– unless they recognize their real interests and position in the world rather than seeking to be beneficiaries of the system.

“smarter 49% of the population that just wants to be left alone.”

People will not be left alone, because we are not alone. That vast interconnection of material and informational systems that we live in guarantee that we will not be left alone. The smarter portion of the populace which you suppose to exist better find a way to wrest control from the 1% that is leading us further into disaster. Either we find a way to govern ourselves and give people, or we will find that we will be not left alone in even less pleasant ways.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Frank Hague
2008-10-20 06:32:49

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/20/business/media/20carr.html?ref=business

So now even Cramer is a Bear. Maybe it’s time to buy.

Comment by max4me
2008-10-20 07:32:50

I always wonder if cramer had a conscience and knew he was wrong but his “friends” on the street had photos of him, with h++kers and B+ow.

Just like how the NAR has shut up

 
Comment by Earl 288
2008-10-20 08:10:45

Every guy who ever bought a stock, always thought he was getting a bargain.

 
Comment by takingbets
2008-10-20 11:38:02

Best description of Cramer i’ve heard so far.

From the article:

“He’s just a barker in front of a tent that is collapsing.”

 
 
Comment by hoz
2008-10-20 06:34:49

“Why power prices aren’t falling

Robert Peston
20 Oct 08

There was a hope that a global economic slowdown, which has led to a fall in oil prices, would also lead to a fall in the gas and electricity prices we all pay.

I’ve been talking to those who run our big power companies. And this is what they say:

1) gas prices are still 70% higher than where they were last winter, in spite of a fall in the past few weeks;
2) electricity prices are double where they were last winter;
3) there is very little spare capacity in the electricity generation market, because of the age and fragility of our generators, so there’s a risk that - if another generator were to fall over - electricity prices could rise further;
4) over the summer, energy companies bought power on the forward market at prices that are higher than where they are today;
5) it’s currently very difficult to hedge power prices at the slightly lower prices now prevailing, because the credit crunch has reduced the capacity of financial firms to take the other side of bets on the future path of energy prices (which is why certain power companies are no longer providing big fixed-price contracts to huge industrial consumers);
6) all the power companies are generating much reduced profits from their retail energy businesses, such that if they suffer a further margin squeeze they may well find it harder and more expensive to raise credit (another painful impact of the credit crunch);
7) power companies have no idea whether this winter will be cold, and therefore whether there will be a surge in demand for gas and electricity, which will lead to a spike in wholesale prices.

Put it altogether and what you’ve got is the near-certainty that those increased prices we saw in the summer - with British Gas increase the gas tariff by 35% and electricity by 9% - will prevail for many more weeks to come, and possibly all through the winter.

All the power companies will do what they can for those on lowest incomes. And they are conscious that for small businesses, the high cost of energy can prove fatal.

But the vast majority of us would probably be foolish to factor into our budgets any significant fall in what we pay for energy.”

BBC

The same is true for the US.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2008-10-20 07:50:00

Think energy prices are high now? Wait ’til Obama’s EPA starts shutting down all the coal-fired electricity generating facilities in this country.

Here’s a sample PSA in the year 2015.

“With mostly cloudy skies and light winds today, Distribution Plan C is in effect. Homes and businesses north of Main Street will have electricity during the odd-numbered hours while those on the south side will have electricity during the even hours. As there is little extra power available today to recharge the spinning reserves, all electricity will be shut down one hour after sunset.

“With tomorrow’s forecast calling for heavy overcast, rain, and practically no wind, Distribution Plan D will be in effect. That means customers will have electricity for just two one-hour periods, and no power after sunset.”

Comment by taxmeupthebooty
2008-10-20 08:06:48

nuks are the only “alternative” energy
the rest is bs

Comment by Skip
2008-10-20 09:39:26

Did we ever find a place to store the spent rods and other contaminated rubbish from the nuclear plants?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by hoz
2008-10-20 11:54:11

It would be faster to open up the arctic for drilling or employ Mr. Boone Pickens’ ideas than it will be to get more nuclear reactors.

The waiting line at Mitsubishi for a reactor containment vessel is 12 yrs. Who do you think makes the reactor containment vessels? Who do you think has orders in place for the next 30 yrs? Not the US.

 
Comment by nhz
2008-10-20 13:42:50

and even if we did solve the technical issues, there is the financial issue of saving for safe and clean dismantling of the nuclear reactor (probably more expensive than building it) and 100.000 years or safe storage.

The nuclear reactor in my little corner of the world is saving for this with a small capital that should accumulate by 12% every year for the next 50 years, totally risk free of course so this method of paying for future cost is approved by the local politicians. One little detail: part of the capital was parked at an Icesave account (just like many of the local governments did). At least the money will be safely hidden for the next 100.000 years or so, but I think our taxpayers will have a huge problem in 40 years.

 
 
Comment by calex
2008-10-20 09:40:01

Nuk is a joke. It is the worst form of electric. I would rather go without light than have millions of nuk plants.

Something so bad that you have to wear a protective suit, collecting the fuel, converting the fuel, working on it, removing it, transporting the waste from it, and storing it in an underground vault that may or may not seep into the water supply and air we breath.

The thing that is BS, your comment about it being the only alternative energy.

And before you come up with that useless stament of “its safe now”….accidents happen otherwise we would not have the word accident in the dictionary of every language.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by AdamCO
2008-10-20 08:11:04

How would this affect my hoverboard?

 
Comment by Jon
2008-10-20 10:49:01

Obama is strongly in favor of coal powered plants. Check out his website.

 
 
 
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2008-10-20 06:50:00

Is this who McSame / McVague thinks is “tearing apart the very fabric of American Democracy”? :-)

Mark Anthony Jacoby, the owner of a signature-gathering firm called Young Political Majors, was taken into custody by Ontario police just after midnight Saturday and booked with a felony punishable by up to three years in prison.

According to The Los Angeles Times, Jacoby’s firm was paid $7 to $12 by the CRP for each GOP voter registration signature, but dozens of voters who signed on said they were duped into registering as Republicans and thought they were signing a petition to toughen penalties against child
molesters.

Republican Voter Registration Chief Arrested for Fraud in California

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/20/republican-voter-registration-chief-arrested-fraud-california/

Comment by exeter
2008-10-20 06:57:07

The gop scamming the voter registration system? You don’t say!

 
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2008-10-20 07:36:54

A bit off-topic, but this reminds me of an old TV show called “The Man’s Show” from a few years ago. One of their funnier pieces was setting up a booth along the beach (I think it may have been Santa Monica Pier) in California and asking women to sign a petition to repeal women’s suffrage. They got tons of signatures - only 2 or 3 women knew what it meant.

Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 08:22:01

It was almost 20 years ago, but it seems like only yesterday…

I was learning how to play the piano (it didn’t take) and we had gone to see The Fox (later of Man Show fame) @ some watering hole in the San Fernando Valley, and he could stand his head and drink beers, and jump back on the piano and sing dirty songs, with the accompaniment of his wife singing along occasionally.

After the show I said out loud, wouldn’t it be great to have The Fox @ my place for a party?

I had a rental piano, so that angle was covered.

We hit him up to do a gig, and a price was set and…

About 35 people devoured $900 worth of booze that night The Fox came my party, and I can now divulge his ugly drinking secret…

I saw his wife pouring apple juice into those supposed steins of beer, in my kitchen.

Ziggy ziggy ziggy ziggy hoy hoy hoy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjoMMGhJW-k

 
 
Comment by Blano
2008-10-20 08:04:13

“Dozens” pales in comparison to all the dead people registering as Democrats in the big cities. Thanks for the laugh.

Comment by exeter
2008-10-20 08:31:55

Dead people in big cities registering as democrats?

Link? Proof? Put up.

 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-10-20 08:26:10

In the good old days, it only took a free beer.

 
Comment by polly
2008-10-20 09:07:52

What difference does it make if they were registered as republicans, democrats or independents? The primaries are over. You don’t have to vote for your party once you are in the booth.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 06:54:05

Wall Street Journal
* INFORMATION AGE
* OCTOBER 20, 2008
Don’t Sell Hedge Funds Short
They were the first to signal troubles at Tyco, Enron and now Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and banks.

After a dinner in April with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Lehman Brothers CEO Richard Fuld emailed the good news of what he learned to his general counsel. Mr. Fuld reported that Mr. Paulson wanted to “kill the bad” hedge funds and “heavily regulate the rest.”

Mr. Fuld was delighted to hear that Treasury sided with Lehman against hedge funds that were short selling its shares, along with those of several other investment banks. Instead of blaming hedge funds for their prediction that the Lehman share price would fall, Mr. Fuld should have acted on the short sellers’ clear warning, months ago, that he was atop a powder keg of mortgage-related securities that would soon explode. Instead, Lehman is bankrupt and Mr. Fuld is a former CEO.

For their part, regulators spooked markets by trying to make short sellers the scapegoats for problems they didn’t cause. The biggest impact of the temporary ban on short selling, which expired earlier this month, was its role in undermining the trust on which markets rely. Why would regulators ban short selling in nearly 1,000 companies, effectively banning accurate information from the markets?

 
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2008-10-20 06:57:05

It’s UnAmerican to vote early! You’re not a true Patriot! :-)

“Young repubicans”: Fear the blackman…fear Jackie Robinson…he’ll ruin baseball & our Nation. ;-)

…Photographer Joe Eddins and I headed over to the closest one and found a steady line of voters hoping to cast ballots early. Most seemed to be Obama supporters and several had come from the rally. Nearly all the voters were black.

Also at the polling site was a group of loud and angry protesters who shouted and mocked the voters as they walked in. Nearly all were white.

As you can see from these videos, no one held anything back. People were shouting about Obama’s acknowledged cocaine use as a young man, abortion and one man used the word “terrorist.” They also were complaining that Sundays are for church, not voting.”

McCain supporters heckle early:votershttp://washingtontimes.com/weblogs/bellantoni/2008/Oct/20/mccain-supporters-call-early-voters-ch/

Comment by NoSingleOne
2008-10-20 08:28:01

I wonder why these same idiots never bring up W’s cocaine abuse and drunk driving, or Johnny’s wife swapping and sheltering Charles Keating?

At least O’Bama is the only one who discussed his transgressions publicly and refers to them as “mistakes”, not as something to be swept under the rug.

Comment by Skip
2008-10-20 09:45:18

Those were “youthful indiscretions” not mistakes. And how dare you bring those up!!

 
 
 
Comment by Mormon_Tea
2008-10-20 07:00:50

Well, OK, I did buy more SLV today.
500 @ 9.45. Total now 42000.

Just sayin’

I rent.

Comment by realestateskeptic
2008-10-20 07:46:43

I think you should diversify into Copper as well.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-10-20 08:34:06

What is your rationale for buying in a steep slide?

Comment by ButImNotDeadYet
2008-10-20 11:06:25

Buy low, sell high???

 
 
 
Comment by SUGuy
2008-10-20 07:04:09

My question is, is it going to be stagflation, deflation, hyperinflation, inflation or something along the likeness to depression. All these scenarios have been predicted here on the blog. Do we have a clear picture of what is going to unfold yet?

Comment by darthrealtor
2008-10-20 07:40:27

I guess it all depends on the asset you are looking at.

From a US perspective I’d guess housing will continue with a large deflation.

Wages will have slow deflation as jobs become more scarce and workers get paid less.

Commodities will slowly inflate based on worldwide demand. The US consumer is gonna get pinched hard.

Toys like boats, TV’s, etc are probably going to heavily deflate.

I’d say the PM crowd probably should do pretty well and the dollar crowd should be OK short term until the world governments overprints fiat currency in desperation.

Guns, bullets, seeds, livestock and arable land probably are a safe bet also.

Stocks are a tough one but I’d say we’re in for some decent selloffs until the global derivatives meltdown as run its course and stabilized.

 
Comment by tresho
2008-10-20 14:02:02

Do we have a clear picture of what is going to unfold yet? We’re all going to die.

 
 
Comment by hd74man
2008-10-20 07:05:47

RE: GM

What a joke!

German auto maker Mercedes Benz, one of the top auto makers in the world, dumps sorry-azz Chrysler to the tune of lost billions; allowing a collapsing GM to merge with what has always been the odd out US car mfg’er.

This is nothin’ more than a copy-cat “too big to fail” set-up, to extort further billions from the US taxpayer so as to line the pockets of the insiders as the ship is sinking, with a grande finale bankruptcy declaration to dump all the pension and health care costs on the Pension Gurantee Authority.

It’s a no-brainer to see right thru this scam.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2008-10-19-gm-chrysler_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-10-20 07:44:45

They sure are in a hurry all of sudden. They want a deal sealed before the election?!?!?!

I dunno, but when so many folks are all of a sudden in a awful big hurry - what does that tell you? It certainly doesn’t tell me that the bottom is in and worst is over.

You’re right - this is a total set up.

 
Comment by Blano
2008-10-20 07:59:46

Chrysler also has nearly 12 billion in cash which might come in handy.

Comment by Mr. Drysdale
2008-10-20 08:26:36

. . . for a month or two

 
 
Comment by Blano
2008-10-20 08:44:29

I just cannot see how this deal ends well for this area.

Comment by mrktMaven
2008-10-20 11:11:50

WSJ says deal will eliminate 40,000 jobs.

 
 
Comment by Skip
2008-10-20 09:48:23

The PBGC can and has given pensions back to companies that navigate bankruptcy and later become profitable.

Comment by hd74man
2008-10-20 10:27:19

RE: The PBGC can and has given pensions back to companies that navigate bankruptcy and later become profitable.

Like Oldsmobile?

 
 
 
Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 07:17:33

Ode to Shirley Temple…

On the goo-oo-ood ship Lollyprop
It’s a swee-ee-eet trip to a PPT drop
Where the bulls do prey
On the sunny reach of Wall Street Pay

Lemons stand everywhere
‘Cross the de-e-eck spans belly air
And there you are
Happy landing on an iceberg bar

See the money bowl do the give-out role
With the big bad Fed’s Fruit Cake
If you take too much, ooh-ooh
You’ll awake with a tummy ache

On the goo-oo-ood ship Lollyprop
It’s a ni-i-ice trip into hades you’ll hop
And dream away
On the good ship lollyprop

On the goo-oo-ood ship lollyprop
It’s a swee-ee-eet trip to a China shop
Where bulls do play
On the sunny beach of Wall Street Pay

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFGTl_nwOOQ

 
Comment by Clark
2008-10-20 07:40:07

This article says we will see stagflation:
The Panic of 2008 and Financial Socialization, by Michael S. Rozeff

OT- proposal to the pro-tax people:
Gov inspections of meat have failed me plenty. Now I read the gov stops meat packers from testing their products themselves more thoroughly. Just as in real estate, a person is better off using a private inspector, preferably someone you know.

A McD’s drive-thru runs better than a State DMV or Fed TSA airport screen. It seems as though a private company could run Air traffic quite well. Think UPS here.

Nuclear is a lab.

Police officers & firefighters are great private company potential - remove the gov. monopoly & create opportunity. Security is a personal responsibility.

Medical clinics are labs.

We have far too many road signs, some countries even have none, I think. Local businesses could maintain road signs.

HazMat, for the labs?

Lifeguards are hand-holders - enter at your own risk - or hire a private lifeguard.

!8-wheeler safety inspections are just like food inspections, they fail now - as things are currently. A private company could easily do this & probably with less corruption.

Pay a private company a toll to cross the bridge, no problem.

If this were done, safety would improve, jobs would become more secure, efficient, and less flawed overall.

And then… opportunity would be huge - Inspectors, security personnel, medics, lifeguards, and firemen could start their own businesses. People could have some connection to their world, so unlike today’s, hollow, no money down - nothing else in it -world.

Heh- We don’t want your so-called free government services, and stop taking our money. If government had to ask each of us for the money, & we could say no, things might be alright for everyone.

/dream off.

Comment by Mole Man
2008-10-20 08:53:18

What is the point of all this? Is there any relation to the housing bubble?

To address some of what you brought up:
There are no pro tax people.
Government inspections of meat and other foods are just one of the things wrong with our food growth and distribution system which was last overhauled by Nixon with the aim to increase production and consolidate producers.
Nuclear is a lab means you want to have private companies marketing nuclear technologies aggressively to help their bottom lines since that worked out so well in Pakistan.
Security is a personal responsibility is the kind of thing that people say when they haven’t experienced urban gang warfare.
Road signs are the subject of a lot of research, but only a tiny fraction of government spending.
HazMat is a symptom of a broken symptom: The chemical industry is out of control, so we constantly risk massive kills from toxic accidents. The scariest conclusion from the Bhopal investigation was that similar accidents at other chemical plants are not particularly unlikely.
Trucking safety is an open question. Lots of people won’t touch juice or other such products shipped by truck ever since the cross contamination scandal some time ago.
Pay for bridges is a nonstarter as it would disable the existing road network in many cities. This is another clue that you don’t get out much and haven’t bothered to think any of this through. If privatized roadways worked at any level then they would be common. The utter failure of the private truck highway in Texas is a good example of how these efforts consistently fail.

There is lots more to be said, but the biggest giveaway in all this is the total lack of cost benefit analysis. The biggest reason that taxes are likely to go up now is that we just blew three trillion on a useless war that the privatize now so that we can save the lifeguard money people said we could not avoid.

If you really want these things to happen, the logical place to start is with yourself. Stop driving on the roads whenever possible and they will wear out and need to be rebuilt less often. Don’t go to the beach and the lifeguard count will go down. And so on for all of this. You can’t reject the common wealth and public good while you continue to use them for all your daily activities. Look closely at your lifestyle and the wars you advocate and you will see that the pro tax person, to the extent there is any such, is you.

Comment by polly
2008-10-20 09:24:20

To be fair, privatizing all roads or bridges only became technologically doable when ez-pass technology was invented that didn’t require slowing down from highway speeds to register, and that hasn’t existed for all that long. It isn’t mandatory because the current system requires you have a credit card, but it could be converted to a pay the bill after you use it system like your electric bill if someone wanted to try it.

Comment by Jon
2008-10-20 11:07:05

The entire value of private enterprise is competition. Why privatize something for which there is no competition? It’s ludicrous.

I used to work for Houston Lighting & Power. That place makes the government look like a model of efficiency. It is a regulated monopoly with no competition. Has incredible cash revenues that it quickly converts into highly paid, low productivity employees with absolutely no oversight.

I never get the anti-government types. If there was no food inspection, there would be no processed food industry. Why? Because I would just start my own company, underprice everyone else by purchasing the cheapest products, care less about testing for bio-hazards, make a million dollars, kill a million people, declare bankruptcy and start over with a new name. So would thousands of others.

The purpose of the government is to regulate, or run, natural monopolies and to create trust, through regulation, that allows industries to thrive.

Afghanistan has little government, low taxes, and almost no regulation. The US is the opposite. Where would you rather live?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2008-10-20 14:05:41

Afghanistan has little government, low taxes, and almost no regulation. The US is the opposite. Where would you rather live? The answer depends on how many guns and high explosives I & my friends have.

 
Comment by bluprint
2008-10-20 14:27:07

declare bankruptcy and start over with a new name.

Protections afforded to you by way of government interference.

Restore accountability by doing away with corporate and bankruptcy protection, then see how your experiment pans out.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2008-10-20 18:06:13

Hogtie and noose up the pres vp and anyone who sells tainted or defective products or rips off the public ala Enron … imagine a little string the bastards up noose party for Kenny boy Lay + his cronies would have save tons on legal fees a

———————————
Restore accountability by doing away with corporate and bankruptcy protection, then see how your experiment pans out.

 
 
 
Comment by Clark
2008-10-20 09:34:29

That was in respone to a post yesterday. There are millions of “pro-tax” people.

Ideas begin where? In closed loops of thinking? There are going to be a lot of major changes going forward with housing leading the way. Endless government works require taxes. The housing bubble bust screams - not a good time to raise taxes. If so, what do we do differently?

Sharp attack, grumpy today? Complaints are good to hear, complaints are opportunities! I love to hear people complain, gives me all kinds of ideas to help improve peoples lives and perhaps profit myself.

I do not *advocate* war.

 
Comment by Skip
2008-10-20 11:52:54

The utter failure of the private truck highway in Texas is a good example of how these efforts consistently fail.

Its not dead yet…never underestimate the ability of the government to push through projects the taxpayers abhor. Especially, when billions and billions of dollars are at stake and bribery is legal.

 
 
Comment by MEaston
2008-10-20 10:15:44

Dream off??
or Crazy off

Take a look at China or any third world country and see what happens when there are poor regulations and regulators aren’t accountable via politicians to the people.

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-10-20 21:14:13

And there are reasons we have a “Civil Service” - no matter how reviled their efficiency.

Any private system with the same checks and balances would seemingly… have the same efficiency problems, eventually.

 
 
 
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2008-10-20 07:43:46

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-foreclosure-courtoct20,0,3770516.story

Just off the elevators on the 28th floor of the Daley Center, a scene of arresting beauty unfolds. Sunlight glints off Lake Michigan, high-definition views extend for miles and the city seems almost suspended through the lobby’s wall of windows.

Not that anyone would notice: Most visitors enter with heads down, distracted, clutching a mass of papers and searching for the right courtroom.

Cook County’s foreclosure court is so busy with the wreckage of the sub-prime mortgage crisis that the number of judges has been increased from 10 to 14, and they begin their new schedules Monday.

Foreclosures in Cook County were up 47.8 percent in the first half of this year and are expected to pass 42,000 by year’s end. But the increase in judges is not just a sign that things are bad; it’s a sign that things are likely to get worse.

Isn’t there someone on this blog that has posted a few times about Cook County Foreclosure Court a few times?

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-10-20 08:01:53

Yes, Legal Eagle where are you?

Note the article states that they’re still only working on 2007 cases, and haven’t even touched the 2008’s yet.

 
Comment by Kim
2008-10-20 09:28:48

“Cook County’s foreclosure court is so busy with the wreckage of the sub-prime mortgage crisis that the number of judges has been increased from 10 to 14″

Job growth!

Seriously, though, why bother when the Cook County Sheriff isn’t enforcing evictions?

Comment by desertdweller
2008-10-20 11:16:28

Cook Co judges, many of the most
unethical judges, county in the US,
aside from Queens. Or Miami.
Just to name a few.

 
 
 
Comment by Clark
2008-10-20 07:44:02

There is a great deal of money-pumping. This will cause stagflation. The Fed is the cause of stagflation by slowing, then pumping, then slowing, then pumping in succession. The slowings produce the stagnation. The pumpings produce the inflation. The alternation produces uncertainty and confusion. Prices of consumer goods move with lags, and the money effects have lags. This makes direct connections to Fed actions hard to see. The uncertainty means that not everyone views the processes in the same way. Some people think inflation and some think deflation.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rozeff/rozeff231.html

Comment by Ann gogh
2008-10-20 09:22:21

Wow clark; that was beautiful.
Now I know why one week I am productive, and the next week I’m lethargic. I’d go into detail but i’m sure you know about the waves of confusion/anger we are experiencing.

 
Comment by watcher
2008-10-20 09:35:50

Stagflation; a silly word for ‘now we are poor’.

Comment by In Colorado
2008-10-20 10:44:47

That’s double plus good

 
 
 
Comment by bluprint
2008-10-20 07:55:49

hoz/FPSS,

I’ve seen you two discuss that the current credit cycle began back in (a time you disagree on) early 80’s or early 90’s. I think FPSS says appriximately 83 and hoz you have been leaning toward I believe it was maybe 94 (although I’ve seen you post a time or two that you might need to redo your numbers back to the 83 timeframe).

Can you elaborate on what led you to your respective conclusions about when the current cycle began? Theory is one thing, but attempting to actually measure this thing I find to be a lot more difficult.

Comment by watcher
2008-10-20 09:19:47

The current credit cycle began after LTCM collapsed.

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2008-10-20 09:33:43

No, we both agree that it started in 1983.

The difference in opinion was just where house prices are going to end up (in inflation-adjusted terms.)

Basically, Volcker’s deflation meant that the US was once again on an equivalent of a “gold” standard (because no new money was being created.) Since then, they have inflated and inflated, and that’s why we are here today.

Comment by bluprint
2008-10-20 09:47:16

Thanks, that makes sense. Here I had imagined you two had performed some elaborate mathematical analysis… plus I’m not familiar with what happened pre-Greenspan really in terms of monetary policy, like with Volker. I’ll have to look into that (sheesh, this thing just gets bigger and bigger).

So then a couple of difficulties are:

1) How do you determine the whole thing will unwind back to that point (83)? And correlated, why does hoz think it will stop unwinding at 94′ish?

2) How do you acurately measure inflation to adjust for it? (which, I realize, is probably one of the great problems of our age)

#2 is somewhat rhetorical, there’s not a real good answer, but #1 I’m interested in…

 
Comment by ButImNotDeadYet
2008-10-20 18:10:37

I graduated from college in 1983. I remember how dismayed I felt when I watched people from classes that came after me (84, 85, 86 grads) coming straight out of school, how much more money they had available to them (credit cards, mainly). They were living the high life, and I just didn’t understand it at the time. It was truly a paradigm shift. Some of them were buying houses or condos right away, right out of college. It was a little mind-boggling to me, because just getting through the 1979-80-81-82 period was just such a struggle. In order to do anything (a ski trip, for example) as a struggling college student, you had to have CASH or you just didn’t do it. It just seemed like that all changed overnight, and it I really didn’t understand how it all the rules seemingly changed overnight.

So, yeah, I would agree with 1983 as the start of the whole thing…

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2008-10-20 21:18:07

I too graduated college with a technical BS in 1983.
I had 50% of a plant trip (They paid my way back from a technical conference so I could stop off on the way.)

I had to sit beside the Electrical Engineer on the western half of his 30 company tour. (Which kind of screws up our thesis, but what the heck.)

Oh well, graduate school was fun and I started a great career in 1984. My motto is “This Too Shall Pass.” (As long as a black swan doesn’t defacate on it.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by hoz
2008-10-20 10:24:52

As FPSS stated above, in 1983 there was a massive shift in capital expenditure from the fallacious Laffer economic policies.

The reason for 1994 was the elimination of reserve requirements for mortgages. Any bank that made a mortgage for less than 1.5MM in 1994 did not have to put up any reserves.

Essentially from 1981 to the present the US has lived in a bubble economy. One bubble to the next bubble.

Comment by bluprint
2008-10-20 11:32:36

Thanks hoz. One follow-up, reserves for what? If they made a loan for 2 mill, they had to have reserve to do what with?

Or was this perhaps for cases where the originator sold the loan and were required to keep a reserve to buy back bad loans?

 
Comment by scdave
2008-10-20 12:28:11

Arthur Laffer from Pepperdine ??

 
 
Comment by nhz
2008-10-20 13:57:20

for international perspective:
the Dutch housing bubble started +/- 1987 around Amsterdam (financial capital) and by 1990 had spread to most of the country; it is still raging. The Dutch bubble was one of the earliest in Europe, but I remember reading about a few other areas of the world (often around financial centres) where housing bubbles were starting around that time.

I think this is directly linked to Greenspans easy money policy and the remodeling of the Dutch economy after the US economic model during the eighties. We directly imported all the bad Greenspan stuff and the biggest housing bubble in history was the result.

 
 
Comment by Mormon_Tea
2008-10-20 08:04:26

HBB’ers, it is my considered opinion that in order for the Fed to conduct a general reflation of the economy via housing prices, precious metals must assume the lead sled dog team status as point of the new bubble.

Nothing else works.

Comment by Mormon_Tea
2008-10-20 08:27:14

I used sled dog team, to evoke imagry of someone trying to escape the frozen tundra of the nuclear economic winter they created.

tm MormonTeaCo MMVIII

Comment by hd74man
2008-10-20 10:34:03

RE: I used sled dog team, to evoke imagry of someone trying to escape the frozen tundra of the nuclear economic winter they created.

The only imagery a sled dog team inspires in me, are the unending piles of you know what!

Got lime?

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-10-20 08:40:36

You will need one hell of a dogsled to get out of Dodge with 45,000 ounces of silver!

I fail to see how the Feds could use PMs in any way to inflate the housing market.

Comment by Mormon_Tea
2008-10-20 08:54:36

Then join the tribe!

Comment by Blue Skye
2008-10-20 09:43:35

I’m not sure what you mean, but if it is the silver tribe you mean, I am, but I don’t need a dogsled, just a sturdy backpack.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Clark
2008-10-20 08:06:20

FDR’s policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA economists calculate
By Meg Sullivan| 8/10/2004 12:23:12 PM

http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409.aspx?RelNum=5409

Time is an out-of-round barrel we must experience over & over. The housing bubble is proof that time & space are curved & loop?

Comment by packman
2008-10-20 09:53:27

Good find.

In the end the issue is complex, and you’ll find arguments on both sides of the issue - generally however it’s hard to find much written from this perspective, since the MSM is so firmly entrenched in the “government must do something or else we’re all screwed” mindset, with that “something” generally being socialistic policies such as what FDR implemented.

99.9% people would disagree with me, but for what it’s worth - I believe Jimmy Carter was a way better president than FDR, in terms of leaving a positive legacy for the U.S. (I’m not saying that Jimmy Carter was a good president - just presenting how bad I think FDR really was.)

 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-10-20 08:06:50


THE WEEKEND INTERVIEW OCTOBER 18, 2008 Anna Schwartz
Bernanke Is Fighting the Last War
‘Everything works much better when wrong decisions are punished and good decisions make you rich.’
By BRIAN M. CARNEY

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122428279231046053.html
-x-x-x-
Anna Schwartz: “Bernanke Is Fighting the Last War”

Honest to goodness, I said exactly that few years ago. Nice to get corroboration.

‘Everything works much better when wrong decisions are punished and good decisions make you rich.’

Very close to comments I made on this blog. Amazing how our policymakers forget such simple truths.

Comments: “Anna Schwartz, the co-author, with the late Milton Friedman, of the 888-page A Monetary History of the United States implies in an interview today in The Wall Street Journal that Ben Bernanke doesn’t have a clue.”

I could have, and did, tell that years ago. He is close to being a moron on economics of supply and demand for goods and services. He thinks that the “Aggregate Demand” can be artificially manipulated at will. By showering money on bankers and financiers who were pushing bad debt? He also said in march 2007 that home prices will not fall only the price increase will fall to 3-5%. What a moron. He is fit for the bad American system and born-and-bred American dopes that we do have. Everyone – people, leaders and the system – are in harmony!

Under our system we do get the leaders that we deserve, or, more accurately, our leaders breed people they can mislead without any resistance! Viva la resistance?!! America — an idea whose time is past.

Jas

Comment by cactus
2008-10-20 12:58:05

“We and other global firms have, for many years, urged the SEC to reform its net capital rule to allow for more efficient use of capital. This is the single most important factor in driving significant parts of our business offshore, so that our firms can remain competitive with our foreign competitors risk-based capital standards must become the norm. ”

- Goldman Sachs, CEO Hank Paulson, Feb. 29, 2000

Arthur Levitt, Clinton’s Sec Chariman, wouldnt go along with it. They passed it in 2004.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/27217313

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2008-10-20 08:33:44

Open your wallet. Gov’t is going to pour more cash into it! Speaking today on Capitol Hill Federal Reserve Chief Ben Bernanke assured a Congressional panel that it might be a good idea to send out another stimulus package. “With the economy likely to be weak for several quarters, and with some risk of a protracted slowdown, consideration of a fiscal package by the Congress at this juncture seems appropriate.”

Poor old B.B. the fellow who supposedly knows more about the GD than anyone else. Gonna send us some more ’stimulator’ checks, why not send us all $100,000.00 each this go round.

Comment by exeter
2008-10-20 08:50:36

I’m in line. Give me more.

 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2008-10-20 09:05:08

I’ll vote for any candidate that makes it so that we don’t ever have to work again and can hang out at the mall all day.

Comment by hd74man
2008-10-20 10:38:31

RE: I’ll vote for any candidate that makes it so that we don’t ever have to work again and can hang out at the mall all day.

Got my vote for HBB’s “Line of the Day” Award, EJ,
despite tears in my eyes and spewed coffee on the screen.

 
Comment by Ann gogh
2008-10-20 11:16:11

Yo! My brilliant thought for the weekend was:
Have o’bama tax crack dealers to pay for education.
Let’s also tax realtors 50% percent when they get their 6%. Just a thought.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2008-10-20 10:42:17

Better they give it to us than bail out some brain dead corporation.

 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2008-10-20 08:55:58


Part between ***** was emphasized in the original.

David Rosenberg:

“Deflation, not inflation, is the number one medium-term risk —
And the Fed knows it – see page A2 of the weekend WSJ (“Amid Pressing Problems, Threat of Deflation Looms”). Indeed, one of the reasons we like Treasuries is because we believe the Fed at some point is going to be buying a whole lot of them to bring down long-term rates (and hence mortgage costs) as they did in the 1940s. This is definitely in Bernanke’s tool-kit. And as for deflation risks, go back and reread Janet Yellen’s speech of last week – ***** “In recent months, however, the outlook for inflation has noticeably changed. Commodity prices, including the price of oil, have plunged. And I expect this development, along with a further increase in slack in labor and product markets, to push inflation down to, and possibly even below, rates that I consider consistent with price stability”.*****

Jas

Comment by scdave
2008-10-20 09:58:25

Do you have a link Jas ??

Comment by Jas Jain
2008-10-20 10:33:40


Sorry, I get the reports. Lot of people have asked for the link to Rosenberg’ comments.

Jas

 
 
Comment by VirginiaTechDan
2008-10-20 09:58:56

Remember that price stability should not be the goal because it is “price fixing”. The goal should be to eliminate the fraud that is someone getting something for nothing (banks lending money into existence).

Slow steady deflation as a result of increasing economic productivity with a stable monetary base free from systemic fraud would be the expected result of a fraud-free system (barring natural disasters that decrease the supply of goods causing inflation).

Comment by Jas Jain
2008-10-20 10:11:46


Dan,

We agree.

Jas

 
Comment by Cosgrove
2008-10-20 10:23:42

Banks only lend money into existence if it can be profitably lent out. If it can’t, they shouldn’t. The “something for nothing” part is the interest. In a rational system, that should only accrue if the economic activity it supported actually was profitable for someone. The injection point remains the banks, but they don’t get free money for nothing– they still have to deploy it effectively. (I am not saying what we have right now is a rational system.)

On the other hand, a stable monetary base is deflationary, since it provides no incentive to invest in expanding production; merely accruing and holding money is sufficient to gain returns.

Besides, someone is going to want control of the monetary base sooner or later; it is too useful a power to ignore for long. If no government had that power, people would make one that did. The trick is to make sure that the monetary base is expanded in the right way.

In any case, I think the fractional reserve system is doomed– but for entirely different reasons than yours.

 
 
 
Comment by Mormon_Tea
2008-10-20 09:05:43

No really, folks, when you see silver prices particulary, going higher, as in a bubble, you will know that confidence is returning to the jungle.

Any collectible gold or silver artifacts, jewelry, bullion bars, etc. will grow in value in dollars. Every year, year after year.

Comment by Blue Skye
2008-10-20 10:53:08

As in…….2008?

 
 
Comment by exeter
2008-10-20 09:11:49

“Deflation, not inflation, is the number one medium-term risk —”

You’re stating the obvious jas. The demand side stimulus checks of 3 months ago and new demand side stimulus suggested by BB today screams deflation, loudly.

Comment by Jas Jain
2008-10-20 10:35:32


Thanks, Exter, for corroboration. What is obvious to some may not be to others.

Jas

Comment by hoz
2008-10-20 10:50:59

I notice that everybody loves US Treasuries. 10 yr yielding 2% yet? lol There is so much demand that the US decided out of the kindness of its heart to issue another $55B this week.

Comment by Jas Jain
2008-10-20 11:54:00


I know you will keep barking even when the 10-Y yield hits 2% before 2010 is out. Why not now? After all the pre-emptive shots to fight the depression have been fired! Then, deflation, like Shogun Tokugawa, would simply walk in. Eliminate your enemies patiently and then walk in.

It is below 4% now. Shouldn’t it be 6-8% range that Greenspan forecast last year? Why is it not in Bill Gross’s 4-5.5% range??

You don’t know diddley about USTs because you don’t know diddley about what causes deflation.

Jas

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by bluprint
2008-10-20 12:12:29

So, what causes deflation?

 
Comment by bluprint
2008-10-20 12:15:45

And if I might ask, what is your PhD in?

 
Comment by hoz
2008-10-20 12:22:48

Do you really believe the government is going to stop spending? Flight to safety is going to remain forever? You know jackshit about the international flow of money.

I’ll take my treasury trading over yours any day. You keep doing what your doing, I’ll keep making moneys.

A disaster scenario such as yours is completely irrational. You have no basis in any facts. There are only two situations in the last 100 years that resulted in deflation. In those 2 situations The Great Depression and Japan in the ’90s, the central banks tightened credit. That is a fact.

How many similar situations resulted in inflation or hyper inflation? Do you even have a clue? Do you even bother to research anything? Your idea of an economic research paper is reading the mope from Merrill.

I change my opinion based on facts. You are illogically steadfast denying the probability of money flows.

You are assuming (and it is a huge assumption) that the $10T overseas is going to passively sit on the sidelines instead of scooping up assets. That is already shown to be false as Sovereign Wealth Funds are already looking for tangible investments world wide.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2008-10-20 13:26:39

I think hoz has it right: disinflation followed by inflation. What I’m trying to figure out now is how long the disinflation will run before the inflation starts to shine through…

hoz, any thoughts?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 16:15:24

“You are assuming (and it is a huge assumption) that the $10T overseas is going to passively sit on the sidelines instead of scooping up assets.”

I tend to side with Hoz on this point. The printing presses are running amok while asset prices are dropping. But at some point, after knives have fallen far enough to inspire courage, freshly printed monies stuffed under mattresses will come out of hiding and restart asset price inflation. The govt has every reason to do what it can to encourage this to happen sooner rather than later.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 13:46:13

There is a rumor floating in the press that the Fed’s playbook includes the option to purchase Treasurys in order to tamp down l-t yields.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Blano
2008-10-20 10:55:15

Ok, a question for both of you…..how can pumping more and more money, whether it be from stimulus, bailout, liquidity injection, etc. etc. etc. scream deflation?? Seems like the opposite would end up occurring. Not an expert on the subject.

Thanks.

Comment by Jon
2008-10-20 11:16:37

People talk about inflation/deflation being a quantity of money issue. It really isn’t. It is a velocity of money issue. If no one is spending, regardless of how much you have, you get deflation.

If the government writes me a check for $10,000 and I put it into a savings account instead of buying a new car, prices of cars will decline.

Inflation and deflation are about psychology, not the quantity of money/credit.

Comment by hoz
2008-10-20 11:33:14

“If no one is spending, regardless of how much you have, you get deflation.” lol

Which government is not increase its spending? There is no difference if the spending is done by governments or companies or individuals. If you don’t understand that, then you completely miss this market.

Deflation should not be confused with temporarily falling prices which are indicative of disinflation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jon
2008-10-20 13:03:48

Wrong. The government is pouring trillions into the international banking system and nothing is happening. Why? Because the banks are sitting on the money. It isn’t moving. The Fed is effectively monetizing bad debt here, just screwing around with bank’s balance sheets.

That is wholly different than sending trillions to individuals who would might spend it (if the gov did it correctly). That would be inflationary.

Inflation is relative to last week/month/year. The federal government is not spending fast enough in sectors that might be inflationary to make a difference relative to wage deflation/unemployment and monetary deceleration. They are just pissing in the wind.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-10-20 13:34:31

Can you explain that for the simple minded please? What do you mean by disinflation, if it is not deflation. Maybe I’m just not thinking in enough dimmensions.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 13:49:14

Let’s be clear. If the govt hands out stimulus of $150bn or so to households plus $700bn or so in direct stimulus plus many more $100bns in below-market loans to banks, but nobody is willing to do anything but horde the dough under their proverbial mattresses, then there is no demand, there is still supply, and there is deflation, even if it is only temporary.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 13:51:28

By contrast, disinflation means a decline in the inflation rate, or rate of change in the general price level, to a still-positive rate. I suppose by standard inflation measures, we still have inflation, as Hoz suggests, unless one narrows their focus to sector-specific assets like housing or banking stocks.

 
Comment by hoz
2008-10-20 14:04:19

Is that a test PB?

Ok, the government can order 50,000 widgets that would never have been sold and send them to the troops in Iraq. Forcing the widget company to produce new widgets. Or buy Airplanes from Boeing or order new cars from GM.

The government will be in active competition with the public on purchasing items to keep the economy moving. That is what happens when about 1/3rd of the working population in the US works for some form of government.

 
Comment by bluprint
2008-10-20 14:35:07

PB, your scenario highlights one of the reasons I subscribe to the “inflation is expansion of money” definition.

In your scenario, I would say you are describing inflation without the expected increase in prices, which I agree is totally possible.

However, I think at that point what we have is a recognition problem. Or more specifically delayed recognition. You can’t beat the fundamentals, all the inflation you describe will be recognized, it’s just a matter of when.

 
Comment by measton
2008-10-20 19:52:41

I liked the prior post that described it as pump and deflate. I see further deflation until the middle class feel that they are earning more and that these earnings are secure. If the FED pumps money into banking will the banks lend when the consumer is dead?? Will companies borrow to expand when the consumer is dead?? I think not. The only way out is to shore up the middle class. One time checks do little to inspire confidence. Middle class tax cuts and jobs programs are the best way to make the middle class work and spend. The top 5% really need to understand that there will be a lot fewer wealthy people when the middle class collapses, and even those that survive will have to spend more of their money on security.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 20:47:49

“In your scenario, I would say you are describing inflation without the expected increase in prices, which I agree is totally possible.”

Let’s call it ‘incipient inflation’, then, shall we?

 
 
Comment by exeter
2008-10-20 12:24:12

The unwillingness or lack of means to spend is exactly my point. What better way to augment the demand side than to send out ‘free’ money.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2008-10-20 13:37:32

“If the government writes me a check for $10,000 and I put it into a savings account instead of buying a new car, prices of cars will decline.”

Well, maybe not. What if the bank takes your $10,000 deposit and loans it out to someone else to buy a car? What if they make 10 car loans?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by combotechie
2008-10-20 17:31:09

It would be nice if they would, but they aren’t… and that’s the problem.

Any money coming onto a bank’s balance sheet stays there to replenish it after all the past writeoffs. This sucks money out of circuation. Money sucked out of circulation is deflationary.

 
 
 
Comment by cactus
2008-10-20 13:01:55

how can pumping more and more money, whether it be from stimulus, bailout, liquidity injection, etc. etc. etc. scream deflation??

if its hoarded out of fear its deflation

Comment by Blue Skye
2008-10-20 13:41:15

Having the Fed pump money into the banks screams deflation in that they are trying to counteract the bank’s natural inclination to slow lending. If the banks weren’t tightening up, there would be no need to “stimulate”.

How much money do you have to stuff up a bank’s a$$ until it comes out their ears?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Clark
2008-10-20 09:14:16

It may be true, the Egyptions could at one time forge steel in one step, an astounding feat we cannot duplicate today. At times, the history of the river Nile is the history of the economy of Eqypt, boom and bust with rain or drought. I wonder if the bust wiped out the knowledge set which created steel in one step.

Unintended consequences? At this moment in time, is the world on the verge of loosing a large specialized knowledge set simply because the powers-that-be manipulate, restrict & monopolize etc… barriers to entry, so that by the time the younger generation gets into a position to learn & build, the older generation are unable to communicate what they know?

Comment by aladinsane
2008-10-20 09:31:33

I expect most upside-down homeowners to walk like an Egyptian.

 
Comment by hoz
2008-10-20 11:10:54

“the Egyptions could at one time forge steel in one step”

Bronze? maybe, steel no way.

Comment by vozworth
2008-10-20 12:58:48

started a move back into WPRT under 4.20

this looks fair, going forward. Split adjusted and CAD withstanding.

Comment by hoz
2008-10-20 13:54:34

Great minds think alike! I was looking at it today as well as yesterday. Just haven’t pulled the trigger. It was nice to me this year, go for a fifth of Barbancourt 5star. lol

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by vozworth
2008-10-20 16:06:50

I see this as one dollar and one cent.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by ella
2008-10-20 09:59:57

This is 4-week old news, but seems perfect for today’s thread.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601088&sid=aPRFFY2px4zc&refer=home

Damien Hirst Bucks Financial Slump in Record Art Sale

Sept. 16 (Bloomberg) — Damien Hirst’s “The Golden Calf” kept alive a 10-year bull run in the art market last night as collectors vied for the British artist’s works at Sotheby’s, even as global stock markets collapsed.

Hirst’s “Beautiful Inside My Head For Ever” auction in London took 70.5 million pounds ($126.6 million) with fees, led by the 10.3 million-pound preserved Charolais calf with 18-carat gold horns. The total was a record for a sale of works by one artist, said Sotheby’s, which had estimated the evening would fetch as much as 62.4 million pounds. All but two of the 56 lots sold.

“The sale was magnificent, a triumph,” London dealer Ivor Braka said in an interview. “At a time when other markets are reeling, the people with the free cash and the will have ignored the storm warnings and the voyage goes on.”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 10:13:56

Banks large and small are interested in a piece of bailout pie.

SPECIAL REPORT AMERICA’S MONEY CRISIS
Bailout interest ‘broad’ - Paulson
Treasury Department lays out process for banks to apply for funding.
By Tami Luhby, CNNMoney.com senior writer
Last Updated: October 20, 2008: 12:32 PM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Banks of all sizes are interested in a piece of the federal government’s $250 billion fund to recapitalize financial institutions, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Monday.

“We have received indications of interest from a broad group of banks of all sizes,” he said.

 
Comment by ella
2008-10-20 10:22:37

I posted this yesterday, but it slipped away somehow. Maybe it was too boring to stick :) I’ll leave out the links.

International moral hazard? (from worthwhile dot typepad dot com)

The problem is this: If an Irish or German bank, for example, can issue debt that is guaranteed by its government, it may have an easier time raising money than a bank in a country such as Canada, one that doesn’t offer such security.

Similarly, in the current climate of panic, there is a risk that deposits will begin flowing to regions where they are fully insured by government coffers.

In other news, the Canadian Finance minister promised to ‘inject’ $25 billion into the financial system (from globe & mail)

A plan originally earmarked for Friday morning would see the government assume some mortgages currently held by the banks by giving them to the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corp., a Crown corporation. In turn, the banks might receive CMHC paper – possibly bonds – against which they could use as collateral for their own loans from other banks.

$25 billion is a lot for a country with our population. I’m not sure if turning up the airconditioning will save our igloos at this point, but what do I know.

Comment by nhz
2008-10-20 13:47:25

yes, we are seeing this problem within EU countries now, and probably between EU countries soon. Currently mostly an issue with savings accounts, but I guess it will spread to mortgages (with EU governments guaranteeing all mortgages, ultimately).

Read the stories about New Zealand and others, and you will recognize that 25 billion is very little money for Canada …

Comment by ella
2008-10-20 16:10:19

I’m not losing sleep over the BN 25, I just meant that we have such a wee little population, it is more than it sounds like at first glance. The CMHC is already government backed anyway.

How can the government(s) guarantee all mortgages in the end, though? In the end it just becomes state housing, by that logic?

In unrelated news, I just bought $70 worth of rice! It was $45 last year. Thus inflation snuck up on me. It is an enormous amount of rice, though, and it is the very best rice, so my complaints are pretty petty. However, if I can find a way to pin it on the NAR, or old AG, etc. I’ll grouse a bit more. Grouse, grouse, grumble. Ooh, time to make dinner with my tasty new Tamaki GOLD. It’s the only gold I’m invested in :)

 
 
 
Comment by Mormon_Tea
2008-10-20 10:46:22

Looks like King Kash has been spending some “quality time” with Countess Silver this morning.
“Give me all 36 cents”, she moaned; A true story…

 
Comment by Mormon_Tea
2008-10-20 11:22:00

Some time ago I said SLV was at a discount to the reported paper “spot” price, but would soon trade at a premium. Looks like there has been some trading at a premium most of the day today, for the first time.

Comment by vozworth
2008-10-20 18:39:32

containgo

a “buyers” market.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 11:22:41

Perhaps perestroika is a better word for it?

latest news
[AIG] AIG says jobs cuts will be part of restructuring: WSJ

Bernanke won’t say the ‘R’ word
By Rex Nutting
Last update: 11:21 a.m. EDT Oct. 20, 2008

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 16:47:52

Sorry for the repost, but it still seems highly pertinent today one day after the publication date.

Financial Times
US faces worst recession in 26 years
By Krishna Guha in Washington
Published: October 19 2008 22:23 | Last updated: October 19 2008 22:23

The US economy appears to be plunging into what many experts believe will be its worst recession since 1982.

Senior officials at the Treasury and Federal Reserve are confident that the rescue plan for US banks will succeed in preventing a financial system meltdown and ensure there will not be a repeat of the Great Depression. But they know that a sharp economic downturn is already baked in the cake. They do not,however, know how deep or protracted it will be.

Price-cutting: the US economic downturn has resulted in slumping retail sales as consumer confidence collapses

The focus of concern is shifting from the markets – although these remain dangerously stressed – to the wider economy, where the consumer finally appears to be cracking.

The Fed and Treasury were expecting the economy to weaken but not as rapidly as it has, with collapsing consumer confidence, falling home starts, slumping retail sales and falling industrial production.

“The actual deterioration in the data in the last few weeks has been much more severe than anyone was expecting,” said Frederic Mishkin, a professor at Columbia university and former Fed governor.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 11:25:31

October 20, 2008, 1:49 pm
First Birthday for the Recession?

The Federal Reserve chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, declined today to say whether we are in a recession. The only reason to avoid doing so is that it would not be reassuring to admit the obvious. The National Bureau of Economic Research has yet to certify there is a recession, but otherwise there is no doubt.

In fact, just as he began his testimony, the Conference Board released its index of coincident indicators. That index not only confirmed a recession is under way, but it provided powerful evidence that it began in 2007, or in January 2008 at the latest.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 16:20:15

Election implications:

Since World War II, only two recessions have lasted a year or more. Both the 1973-75 and the 1981-82 downturns lasted 16 months.

This recession is likely to last longer than that. If so, it will become the longest downturn since the 43-month recession that lasted from August 1929 to March 1933.

Election-year recessions tend to make voters unhappy, a fact that makes it impressive that Senator John McCain is as close as he is to Senator Barack Obama in the polls.

The National Bureau of Economic Research has calculated recessions going back to 1857, and concluded that there were 10 presidential election years, prior to this one, in which there were recessions under way before November. Of those, the White House changed hands eight times, in 1860, 1884, 1888, 1896, 1920, 1932, 1960 and 1980.

One exception was 1876, a year when the Democrat, Samuel Tilden, appeared to win the White House (and clearly carried the popular vote), but the Republican, Rutherford B. Hayes, carried the electoral college after making a deal to halt Reconstruction, and thereby kept the White House from changing hands. The other was 1900, when President William McKinley, a Republican, won re-election over William Jennings Bryan.

 
 
Comment by CaSellerCoRenter
2008-10-20 11:53:53

Gold is backed by hard work and food.

You wanna eat, raise it yourself or trade goods or gold.
You wanna cross the river, do it yourself or trade me gold.

Here is where it became really important. Once enough
people established trade routes, gold became the easiest
form of trade to carry. Sell all of your stuff. Get a ride
on a boat somewhere, and buy more stuff at the other end.

Gold and Silver are good stuff, Maynard.

Comment by vozworth
2008-10-20 18:38:22

gold and silver are barter.

your own words say it.

I think you can still buy a house in asia for gold though, maybe hawaii.

 
 
Comment by BanteringBear
2008-10-20 12:19:47

The stock market, up nearly 300 right now, appears to be de-coupling from reality.

Comment by takingbets
2008-10-20 13:08:17

Bloomberg says its because Bernanke gave a thumbs-up on another stimulus package. But i have to wonder how quickly that can happen? It seems to me they are starting the party before the guest has arrived.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 13:43:43

One has to wonder how much liquidity was pumped into the stock market on the day BB spoke…

Comment by WhatOnceWas
2008-10-20 19:10:18

One has to wonder how much liquidity was pumped into the stock market on the day BB spoke”….

At this point what another trillion or two between friends? Hand out another $thousand to evryone, another couple hundred billion , here there etc etc. …but there’s no inflation …um…yet. What happens when your dance partner decides she’s tired , and miss Chindia Japrussia decides she has had enough punch?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2008-10-20 13:01:09

Ben Stein is still a big fat idiot. I don’t think he understands the concept of unintended consequences.

Yep, nothing like voiding legally-valid contracts to instill confidence in the business and financial system. If this occurs, what kind of market OR contract is really safe to enter into? Ummm….. None.

This would result in an even more massive seize-up of the credit-system. Next thing you know, overnight-loans could be made null-and-void by the govt.

http://finance.yahoo.com/expert/article/yourlife/115733;_ylt=Aod6pMn1K5×7JUZ.dJnEFE27YWsA

“I might well be too alarmist here, but I think the only rational possibility is for the federal government or the New York State government (because most of the CDS were entered into in New York) to simply annul the credit default swaps as void as being against public policy. After all, there was no insurable interest in most cases, which tends to void insurance contracts, which is what a CDS is.”

Comment by oc-ed
2008-10-20 13:33:36

Joint U.S.-New York Inquiry Into Credit-Default Swaps

http://tinyurl.com/67nbgm

This, and the call to allow bankruptcy judges to recast loan principle as well as interest can only lead to less credit. That is if one tries to think rationally, but for years now from top to bottom the markets have done anything but act rationally.

Comment by Lesser Fool
2008-10-20 14:15:33

Agreed, I think we need to rethink the entire principle of lending.

Comment by ella
2008-10-20 16:18:05

Sharia law prohibits charging interest (usury), and I wonder what developments may come out of merging banking practices between the west and the middle east in the next few decades.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 16:49:36

Some ingenious financiers have figured out clever ways to describe usury as a rose by another name that still smells like charging interest.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 16:50:49

I have an idea: Only lend amounts that the borrower can reasonably be expected to repay out of his permanent income.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by netwt
2008-10-20 14:36:05

House Republicans are also calling for purchasers of homes that are not primary residences to be entitled to the same capital gains exclusion as owners who sell their primary residences. Currently, a single homeowner can exclude $250,000 of capital gains on a sale, while couples can exclude $500,000.

The proposal would only apply to people who bought second or third properties over the next 18 months and held their properties for at least five years.

“This could help take foreclosed properties off the market, raising home values,” said House minority leader John Boehner, R-Ohio.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 16:06:28

‘The proposal would only apply to people who bought second or third properties over the next 18 months and held their properties for at least five years.

“This could help take foreclosed properties off the market, raising home values,” said House minority leader John Boehner, R-Ohio.’

What will they call this measure? I suggest the Flipper Investment Stimulus Act.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 16:08:10

P.S. I don’t think this proposal will get very far, because it sounds like a tax giveaway to the rich, and such proposals are going to go out of fashion when the Democrats run away with the November election.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 16:32:09

Financial Times
Democrats gleeful as Fed backs stimulus
By James Politi
Published: October 20 2008 21:42 | Last updated: October 20 2008 21:42

Democrats on Capitol Hill did not conceal their satisfaction on Monday when Ben Bernanke, Federal Reserve chairman, endorsed the need for a new package of measures to stimulate the US economy.

“I am pleased that [Mr] Bernanke agrees with congressional Democrats about the value of an economic recovery package to help create jobs and increase economic growth,” said Harry Reid, Senate majority leader.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by hoz
2008-10-20 15:00:56

In Cash-Rich Japan, World’s Financial Woes Inspire a Grand Plan
By Blaine Harden
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, October 19, 2008; Page A21

TOKYO — Kotaro Tamura, an investment banker turned Japanese lawmaker, has an immodest proposal for healing the sick global economy, making all Japanese richer and compelling the United States to be more deferential toward Japan.

“We are in a special position because we have huge money,” Tamura said, referring to about $950 billion in government foreign reserves, $1.5 trillion in public pension funds and $15 trillion in personal financial assets, about $8 trillion of which is on deposit at shockingly low interest rates in Japanese banks.

“We should send the signal that we are ready to save the world with this money,” he said in an interview.

Tamura leads a group of 65 lawmakers from the ruling Liberal Democratic Party who have proposed to Prime Minister Taro Aso that Japan treat the global financial meltdown “as a huge opportunity for us.”

They are urging the government to inject some of its abundant cash into troubled U.S. and European banks, in return for equity, and to purchase distressed corporate assets at fire-sale prices.

“The economy of every major power has crashed, and Japan has the least tainted market in the world,” Tamura said. ..

“We are a bank-centered nation that avoids risk, even good risk,” said Akira Kojima, chairman of the Japan Center for Economic Research….

“Everything is very cheap right now [in world stock markets], and 10 years from now we would make very big money,” he said.

His plan calls for Japan to hire outside financial experts to manage its investments in Europe and the United States. “They should be easy to find because they are all losing their jobs,” he said…. ”

China is a nation of gamblers and could do this. Japan takes 6 months to decide to buy a US Treasury. Besides they are all yellow skinned slant eyes and our xenophobic government would ban them from buying anything desirable. (See China’s attempt to purchase UNOCAL)

Comment by vozworth
2008-10-20 17:54:07

I thought the MTU purchase of MS was the signal?….so few could see it.

My personal analysis of the MTU 21% on MS indicates a Japanese backed policy decision, as has been recently postulated, as opposed to a FED brokered proposition….which allows for Treasury and Fed to be percieved as strength.

oh well…. still having fun with the whole adjustment thingy.

 
Comment by vozworth
2008-10-20 19:02:58

bens filters hates my redundant systems.

 
Comment by packman
2008-10-20 21:20:31

I fear that we have perhaps just awoken a sleeping giant!

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 16:17:35

Financial Times
Lousy housing
Published: October 20 2008 09:22 | Last updated: October 20 2008 21:15

So much for the secondary symptoms. How is the disease coming along? With government sights trained on the ailments afflicting Wall Street, the debilitating wastage of the US housing market continues unabated. Housing starts, on an annualised basis, slumped 6.3 per cent in September month-on-month to a 17-year low, the second worst reading since 1959. Homes intended for a single family fell more sharply, down 12 per cent.

Multi-decade lows could, in theory, be good news for a market drowning in existing homes for sale – about 11 months’ worth at the current rate of sales. The figures have now fallen to levels associated with previous troughs. But the patient could yet take a turn for the worse. Building permits continue to decline. Sentiment among homebuilders is at a historical nadir, at least since that measure began in 1985.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 16:41:36

Hedge funds can look forward to evolution by jerks :-)

Financial Times
Long View: Hedge funds poised for harsh phase of evolution
By John Authers, Investment Editor
Published: October 17 2008 19:16 | Last updated: October 17 2008 19:16

Hedge funds are the Galapagos islands of the financial services industry. So at least says Andrew Lo, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology economist who has pioneered the application of evolutionary biology to markets.

According to Mr Lo and many of his acolytes, markets are not efficient, as had been assumed by academics for the past generation, but rather they are adaptive, with participants following Darwinian rules. After periods of relative stability they will undergo periods of intense change as participants evolve to take account of new realities.

Hence hedge funds are markets’ Galapagos, the islands whose unique eco-system allowed Darwin to work out his theory of evolution, because evolution there happens so fast. Lightly regulated, hedge funds offer the closest we have an experimental laboratory for testing which ideas for making money will prove to be the fittest.

Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 16:42:56

Manhattan Island = Galapagos of the financial world…

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 20:52:21

Wall Street Journal
* OCTOBER 21, 2008
Investment Club Weighs Future Amid Turmoil
By CLARE ANSBERRY

The Satin Bags, an investment club for women in their 50s and 60s, spent an evening earlier this month — even before the market’s historic mid-October plunge — holed up in the Butterfly Room of the local country club in Uniontown, Pa., reviewing their investments.

The club’s president, schoolteacher Ruth Frank, provided a quick update. Their portfolio, valued at $100,709 last October, was now worth $92,684. Of their 23 stocks, 14 had lost value since their September meeting. The big loser: once-promising National City Corp., which was trading at $3.14 a share, down 86% since they bought it.

One member, concerned over the club’s performance, had resigned. The club was debating whether to retain its current financial adviser or find a new one.

President Ruth Frank (far right) addresses the Satin Bags investment club at their recent monthly meeting.

The Satin Club
The Satin Club

There was some good news: The club was still in the black over the long term. “We’re still ahead,” said Ms. Frank. “That’s pretty good after what has happened.” Indeed, while their portfolio was down about 8% in total value from a year ago — excluding the $50 monthly contributions each of the members is required to make — it had done much better than many professional managers.

Be that as it may, the club’s 13 members are frightened, which is noteworthy among women who have been around for a while and have seen some bad times and truly nasty markets. The consensus is that this is one of the worst. The sense of urgency they feel is heightened by the fact that they’re older and often relying on a fixed income, making their investments a welcome supplement.

“To be truthful, this is our biggest crisis. Even when the tech market fell, we still held our own,” said Marcia Rabatin, 60, one of the original members. “We just have to be patient and hang in there.”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2008-10-20 20:56:53

Wall Street Journal
* REVIEW & OUTLOOK
* OCTOBER 21, 2008

Bernanke Endorses Obama
There was a time when Fed chairmen feared to even seem political.

Ben Bernanke apparently wants four more years as Federal Reserve Chairman. At least that’s a reasonable conclusion after Mr. Bernanke all but submitted his job application to Barack Obama yesterday by endorsing the Democratic version of fiscal “stimulus.”

While the Fed chief said any stimulus should be “well targeted,” even a general endorsement amounts to a political green light. Mr. Bernanke certainly knows that Mr. Obama and Democrats on Capitol Hill are talking about some $300 billion in new “stimulus” spending, while President Bush and Republicans are resisting. And by saying any help should “limit longer-term effects” on the federal deficit, he had to know he was reinforcing Democratic opposition to permanent tax cuts.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post