Bits Bucket For November 24, 2008
Please visit the HBB Forum. Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.
Examining the home price boom and its effect on owners, lenders, regulators, realtors and the economy as a whole.
Please visit the HBB Forum. Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.
UBS Needs More State Aid, Says Regulator: Report
TOPICS:Politics & Government | Switzerland | Banking
SECTORS:Financial Services
COMPANIES:UBS AG
Reuters | 24 Nov 2008 | 02:12 AM ET
UBS is likely to need a fresh capital injection from the state after the Swiss bank’s shares lost nearly 50 percent this month, a top Swiss bank regulator told SonntagsZeitung newspaper on Sunday.
Daniel Zuberbuehler, Director of the Swiss Federal Banking Commission, said a takeover of UBS was not likely despite the fall in shares and ruled out a merger with domestic peer Credit Suisse.
A modest 666 Billion CHF bailout perhaps, satan?
So how big will our next ’stimulator’ checks be?
Democrats’ Stimulus Plan May Reach $700 Billion
Spending Package Would Rival Financial System Bailout…
Facing an increasingly ominous economic outlook, President-elect Barack Obama and other Democrats are rapidly ratcheting up plans for a massive fiscal stimulus program that could total as much as $700 billion over the next two years.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/23/AR2008112302064.html
Shouldn’t they have to check in with Tokyo, Beijing, Riyadh, etc. before they raise these kind of expectations?
Who’s your daddy?
Your are funny edgewater
I still say $1000 increase in peoples credit cards is the fastest way to get money for people to spend..
And even if 5-10% of the people default on the CC it will be a lot cheaper then actually sending $600 checks to people.
As much as I hate bailing out the homeowners, the best stimulus package is to somehow lower the high mortgage payments. That will put, say, $200-$300/month in a homeowner’s pocket without resorting to Congressional legislation.
Now, if only there was a way to lower those mortgage payments without rewarding the greedy specuvestors, or without “keeping people in their homes ” that they “can’t afford” [ie: don't deserve. Subprime is subprime for a reason.]
Maybe there’s some way to make mortgages contingent on income, not credit score. So if you jingle mail, it blasts your FICO so you can’t get a Mastercard. But you can still take out a smaller mortgage on a house more fitting to your means. [if you wait long enough, the value on some homes will drop to where you can re-buy your home] Great for primary occupants. But If you cashed-out of specuvested, proceed to Chap 11.
I think the best stimulus package would be to pay the first 250-500 of every person’s mortgage. Sure it would reward some greedy speculators and 2nd/3rd home buyers and screw over the people who have paid off mortgages or who rent, but in the end it would be cheaper than $700 billion to Wall*Street or 100 billion to Detroit, but it would help keep people in homes.
The problem is that every proposed solution only rewards the speculators and punishes the prudent. At this point they’ve already blown through a trillion in the bailout and they have trillions more in outstanding loans to insolvent institutions. So far none of this money has done anything to solve the underlying problem, that the people themselves have taken on more debt then they could ever afford to repay. Now they are giving Citi more cash and instructing them to pass their bailout along to the fools.
At this point, giving people another $1k stimulus check is worthless. If my math is correct, for $5T we could give every adult in this country $20k and every child some money to put aside for college. If we actually handed out checks that size the store shelves would be empty in a week and we would be pushing our paychecks around in wheel barrows. However, in this day and age we actually have three separate credit bureaus that track people’s debts. Why not give each person a substantial credit, like $20k, and pay down their debts directly? The government could pay each individuals debt off in order of earliest maturities first with particular attention paid to delinquent mortgage payments. Those that have less than $20k in unsecured loans and are current on their secured loans would receive the remainder of their $20k in cash. A bailout this size would have to be monetized, but if the credit is given equally we suffer the loss in purchasing power equally. Our foreign creditors are left holding the bag but that is going to happen anyway and they need their customers/junkies back.
Although I seldom post, I read this blog religiously and it has helped me maintain my sanity for the last four years. I have great respect the intelligent members of this blog and I look forward to your comments and criticisms on my proposal.
“Why not give each person a substantial credit, like $20k, and pay down their debts directly? The government could pay each individuals debt off in order of earliest maturities first with particular attention paid to delinquent mortgage payments.”
I have a couple of friends well into their 30’s whose parents do this for them every 5-10 years. Nothing changes, no lessons are learned and it is expected everytime financial problems loom for them.
This would be a very dangerous precident to set.
$20K to everyone? Hm, not a bad idea, but $20K is barely enough to dent the Escalades that people bought with their HELOC cash, much less keep them current on a mortgage.
And, if massive numbers of FB’s walk, then the government will effectively be paying their debts anyway: FB walks —> mortage is forgiven (for FB) —> Bank takes hit (because house is underwater) —> Government bails out bank.
FB debts are “paid,” bank starts up again on life support.
I’m not an economist, but I thought that the best way to rewards savers is to make interest rates ridiculously high (the heck with CNBC) and make prices ridiculously low (the heck with the NAR). Great house prices, but high interest prevents the debtor class from specuvesting, which limits demand and prevents another bubble. Great interest rates on savings accounts, but you need cash in the account.
I’m not an economist, but I thought that the best way to rewards savers is to make interest rates ridiculously high (the heck with CNBC) and make prices ridiculously low (the heck with the NAR). Great house prices, but high interest prevents the debtor class from specuvesting, which limits demand and prevents another bubble. Great interest rates on savings accounts, but you need cash in the account.
Hear, hear!!! Couldn’t agree more. Though it’s counter-intuitive, this is exactly what is needed to solve our financial “crisis”.
I could buy a half of a Nikon with one grand.
One grand would get me a complete Yakima Truck Rack system Plus a kayak to stick on top of it. Please give me my $600-1000 stimulous now uncle sam .
Yeah! Give Peter bucks so he can buy a kayak and a rack! Good idea, Peter. Kayaks are the answer. To everything.
Let’s just say that I’m glad I bought my kayak off of cragislist. So that as it sits there, silently accusing me of not being as outdoorsy as I think I am, at least I didn’t pay full price for it. Like most outdoors stuff, buying it used in the fall makes the most sense.
“Kayaks are the answer. To everything.”
No, being on or in the water/beach is the answer to the deepening US economic mailaise . Whether via Kayak, paddle board, surfboard, sailboard, kite surfing,ect. It is all good, and a way for me to stick it to the current corrupt economic system, which will destroy lives and values of an entire generation.
I choose to live out on the water whether than dwell on the current economic nightmare. Can do so as i have little debt and plenty of hard assets & cash to ride out this GD-2
“Let’s just say that I’m glad I bought my kayak off of cragislist. So that as it sits there, silently accusing me of not being as outdoorsy as I think I am, at least I didn’t pay full price for it. Like most outdoors stuff, buying it used in the fall makes the most sense.”
I can buy a good used kayak right now for a steal, dirt cheap but i need to get a truck racking system to transport it. I will get this system as dirt cheap as possible as bing like this should be selling for pennies on the dollar in this economic climate. Getting a truck racking system configured to your personal vehicle is easy if u get it from a dealer or sport shop or even online but buying it used from a desperate seller of craigslist at deep discount is another story.
It is pretty cheap to rent a kayak at the local waterhole ( $10 for all- out hard paddling for two hrs) so i can just rent out for a while and take my time to set up my rig for that personal kayak. I bodysurf a lot so already have my water fix habit satisfied somewhat.
“No, being on or in the water/beach is the answer to the deepening US economic mailaise .”
Waterworld?
Supply side stimulus a’la GW’s massive, budget busting tax breaks for business is acceptable yet the same stimulus on the demand side (Main Street) is unacceptable?
The hypocrisy is mind numbing.
Apparently the party who ran up the deficit to levels that actually threaten the ratings of Treasury bonds and wasted money on a useless war to “stimulate” defense spending thinks of themselves as patriots, but the party elected by the people to fix the economic problem (however misguidedly) are the bad guys for trying to help J6P?
Puhhlease…
Exactly. And I for one am DELIGHTED to see smart people being put back in key positions of government. WTF were the Republicans thinking putting complete morons in every key position? These people couldn’t run a taco stand!
Heck of a job crashing the economy! Heck of a job!
“WTF were the Republicans thinking putting complete morons in every key position?”
Apparently loyalty tests don’t require arithmetic.
So much for the ability of “executive” leadership. This crowd held the concept in such high regard with zero consideration for depth of knowledge and expertise. Much like the Sara Palin factor.. all flash and no cash.
Empty skulls and twisted ideology is the trademark of the gop.
Im really glad we’ve got an intellectual administration waiting to take over; just where are those extra 7 states Obamma thought we had? Would be some nice extra tax dough he could spread around. And just how many three letter words did our new VP pick up since the election? Yep, this new gang shows real depth of knowledge…..this cycle aught to be a doozie.
Oh, and even more debt piled on by anybody would be a good thing how?
How long till we are insolvent again?
Nice try, James. That’s like pulling the punch bowl, while loudly preaching temperance, only after you and your buddies got all tipsy and happy.
Or, it’s like stopping the baseball game in the middle of the ninth inning. Well, supply-side struck out, and badly. Time for the other team to have its time at bat.
Oxide, I’m surprised there is even one knut left that is willing to defend the failure called reaganomics/supply side.
Fed Pledges Top $7.4 Trillion to Ease Frozen Credit (Update1)
By Mark Pittman and Bob Ivry
Nov. 24 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. government is prepared to lend more than $7.4 trillion on behalf of American taxpayers, or half the value of everything produced in the nation last year, to rescue the financial system since the credit markets seized up 15 months ago.
The unprecedented pledge of funds includes $2.8 trillion already tapped by financial institutions in the biggest response to an economic emergency since the New Deal of the 1930s, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The commitment dwarfs the only plan approved by lawmakers, the Treasury Department’s $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. Federal Reserve lending last week was 1,900 times the weekly average for the three years before the crisis.
Isn’t this pretty much more of the same policy that hasn’t worked since late 2007?
I can understand local gov’s are not gonna get much tax revenue wouldnt be cheaper to just mail the checks to the local goverments
At least here in San Diego, mailing the City a big check would allow them to increase retirement payouts and hire more administrative staff. Would not get any bridges built or new sewer lines though.
“….half the value of everything produced….”
Will they be using 2007 valuations? Or 2008?
If they are using ‘08 numbers, the way things are going, they are going to be loaning out about 85 cents.
RE: from Bloomberg report…
Snookered’
Regulators hope the rescue will contain the damage and keep banks providing the credit that is the lifeblood of the U.S. economy.
Most of the spending programs are run out of the New York Fed, whose president, Timothy Geithner, is said to be President- elect Barack Obama’s choice to be Treasury Secretary.
The money that’s been pledged is equivalent to $24,000 for every man, woman and child in the country. It’s nine times what the U.S. has spent so far on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to Congressional Budget Office figures. It could pay off more than half the country’s mortgages.
“It’s unprecedented,” said Bob Eisenbeis, chief monetary economist at Vineland, New Jersey-based Cumberland Advisors Inc. and an economist for the Atlanta Fed for 10 years until January. “The backlash has begun already. Congress is taking a lot of hits from their constituents because they got snookered on the TARP big time. There’s a lot of supposedly smart people who look to be totally incompetent and it’s all going to fall on the taxpayer.”
The democracy ballgame is over. Let the tax revolts begin.
I’m not sure how much more of this stuff I can take before my heart blows a valve or something. These numbers are staggering, and I don’t think these people have a clue what they’re getting this country into. As long as the PTB are living a life of luxury, they will never be working in the interests of the common man and the good of mankind. Sickening.
After this tidbit - the fact that the dollar index is still above 50 speaks volumes about the weakness of the rest of the world’s economy.
We are all very, very hosed.
I’d like to see someone ask Bush/Paulson this question:
“Does all the money the federal government is borrowing to get the economy out of this disaster mean that the federal government will be too indebted to keep its Medicare and Social Security promises to those now under age 50, and should those Americans expect to face impoverishment and early death as a result? If the federal government is takes losses in the future, what sort of people grabbed the related gains in the past?”
WT,
If the government runs out of credit, how do you suppose it will fund the benefits to those now over 50?
I have said that those of us in our ’30s and ’40s will have time to plan for this, as we need to adjust our standard of living down to save money. I get looks of scorn when I tell them that I am saving for retirement, and they invariably point out that I have not bought a house yet. My reply is that I would not be able to save money for retirement if I had bought a house.
This is going to really affect those baby boomers in their ’60s and those that have retired most. The standard of living that they are used to, is just not going to be there. No large house, maybe a senior trailer park if they are lucky. No dining out every night, maybe a McDeath once in a while…
If you have a house that’s paid off, at least you won’t be homeless. Now is a good time to buy, seriously. Many places are being sold way below replacement value, at least here in Miami. Lots of houses are being offered at 75% off peak prices. Where do you put your “saved” money? AAA rated securities, stock market, gold, cash, guns and ammo? There’re not too many safe places to hide your hard earned money these days.
Personally I try to stay healthy, eat right, excercise and ride my bike. Chances are there won’t be a Medicare by the time I retire (44 now).
I figure my retirement will be a free ticket to the soup kitchen and a bed in the shelter. The money that might have secured some modest retirement for our generation is currently looted by the criminals that run this country.
Mike, you will be surprised at how much more pain there is left in the marke… Miami after all has how many years of inventory in the pipeline? 20, 25? Condos in MIA will be worth negative numbers, in that you would have to pay someone to buy one…
Condos maybe, still tough to find a sucker to pay $200K for a 2/2. I am looking at a house built in 2004. 1450 sqft 3/2 for $115K asking. The place last sold in 3/2006 for $430K. That’s cheaper than I can rent a similar place right now.
What else to do with $$? Gold or energy stocks? There’re not too many places to hide these days. The dollar might be worthless once our government is done bailing out everbody under the sun. I am mostly in cash right now but long term that’s probably not a wise move.
In my opinion it is better to have cash and mobility than put your money in cheap drywall. House prices aren’t going up any time soon. There will be plenty of time in the future to buy a house. Let others set the new comps in the neighborhood and screw things up. Florida will be raising taxes heavily as second homes come on the market and people exit Florida. Boomers will be selling their houses for a long time. The best thing anybody can do is wait this one out. I think one should find opportunities in their own field of expertise. Being a jack of all trades and master of none also applies to opportunities in business.
Mike,
You’re seeing 75% off in Miami? It’s pretty hard to find 50% off in Palm Beach; I’m a bit surprised to hear that you’re already showing down 75% in your neighborhood.
And, I do agree, now is a reasonably good time to buy. Don’t pay anything over 100/sq/ft for the home, make sure the neighborhood is good, established and STABLE, and you should be fine. Taxes are going to go up (the mill rate) in FL, so be prepared for that. Insurance will probably go up again as well, so be sure to figure in the extremely high carrying costs of FL. Many/most of the homes for sale in my hood are all still outrageously priced, but, I do agree, I am starting to see some that are coming down into the range I think is “reasonable”.
The question isn’t “can I afford it”, the question is “how low will it go”. Condos in FL (that aren’t oceanfront) are going to see their values erode to 0. However, SFH are massively overbuilt as well, so how far below construction costs will they fall? At some point, investors will come in, buy them, and rent them out, making money on the rent (vs their carrying costs). Until that starts to happen, I think we’ve still got some way to go down.
I’m pretty much set on my target of 100/sq/ft, I’m now seeing plenty of homes in that range. Depending on the location, the land may have some value, so add a bit over the 100/sq/ft mark for some locations. However, most of these big “mega developments” that were built in the last 10 years; the land has close to 0 value. If you’re not on the water, or right downtown, pretty much assume a value of the land around 0.
They almost got to that point in the 90’s when you add in taxes insurance Condo HOA fees assements etc….and realize you can never ever get a positive cash flow unless its near zero.
——————————————
Condos in MIA will be worth negative numbers, in that you would have to pay someone to buy one
NYC,
They are already at that point in many locations in Palm Beach. Add taxes, insurance, and HOA together. Rent is LESS then the fixed costs. Actually, I was renting a condo like that for a while in downtown WPB, my rent was ~1200/mo, the fixed costs were about 1100.
That’s going to happen all over the place down here (including my favorite 2 projects, the Landmark and the Marina Grande); which is going to make for interesting times! However, the thing that we all have to remember is that the taxes are based on assesements, which are based on sales prices. So taxes would come down dramatically if all of the sudden these 500K condos started selling for 50K. That would alter the equation significantly (from 10K a year in taxes to 1K a year!), and would probably push the unit back to cash flow positive.
Even the house I rent right now, the break even (without any MTG costs) is about 8-9 months of rent. Taxes are 10K/yr, insurance about 3-4K, and HOA another 3-4K. Call that 16K a year, my rent is 24K/yr. That leaves VERY little room for any kind of MTG payment!
They would raise the millage to compensate for the decline…so not much saving there..
Or how do you lay off 25% of the police in WPB?
Even the show COPS loves WPB and the high crime rate… it seems like every month they go to WPB.
———————–
that the taxes are based on assesements, which are based on sales prices. So taxes would come down dramatically if all of the sudden these 500K condos started selling for 50K.
“So taxes would come down dramatically if all of the sudden these 500K condos started selling for 50K. That would alter the equation significantly (from 10K a year in taxes to 1K a year!)”
This is definitely NOT true. When valuations drop the Mill rate skyrockets to yield the same tax bill, unless your taxing authority spends less which is unlikely to happen! Your tax bill is valuation times mill rate. While the falling values may redistribute the tax burden (a little) between certain types of property (commercial, SFR, Condos) it is highly unlikely that with most local costs being labor and fixed, and state and federal aid going south, that your tax bill will actually go down, even if you assessed value goes down 50-75% (it won’t either….). You may end up paying more, for less services. Sorry, but it doesn’t work the way you think, as nice as that might sound.
I’m waiting for “The New American Homestead Act of 2010″
After meeting certain qualifications, you can stake your claim on a vacant house/condo….”improve” the property (do koi ponds count?)…..after, say, 1-2 years, and paying the back taxes, the place is yours!!
Eventually, it would not surprise me if some areas came to this
“This is definitely NOT true. When valuations drop the Mill rate skyrockets to yield the same tax bill, unless your taxing authority spends less which is unlikely to happen!”
In the “normal” world, that’s certainly true. However, in FL, with SOH, it’s not going to work the way it would in a normal taxing environment. The mill rate will go up, I have no doubt about that. But it won’t work the way it would in the rest of the country. Mill rates stayed constant (because of SOH) while properties went up 2-4X over a 5 year period. If the values drop (as they are), the mill rate increases will be blunted.
Does this mean that tax increases are capped and that local budgets get decimated? I am not familiar with SOH, sorry. In MA, we have proposition 2.5, meaning that taxes can’t be more than 2.5% of assessed value, without a 2/3′ds local vote that “overides” that law. In tight years, to preserve schools or police and fire, overides have about a 50% success rate. I’d be interested to know what SOH is. Thanks.
Hi Michael,
” When valuations drop the Mill rate skyrockets to yield the same tax bill,”
Aren’t the mill rates capped at 3% or something like that? I’ve been wondering about that. Once home prices drop so will tax revenue unless they can increase the rate. I thought there’s some item in the Florida constitution that cappes those rates…not 100% sure. Any more datails, anybody?
The 75% prices declines in Miami are mainly on foreclosures in “blue collar” neighborhoods. The slums are hit worse with declines of up to 90% on some foreclusres. Those are usually tear downs that somebody paid $300+K for at one time. There must have been an incredible amount of fraud. The nicer n’hoods are holding up better, but 50% off on foreclosures is not uncommon.
It’s good to see that people are starting to think it’s a good time to buy. I’m starting to see that here in a relative stable part of Ohio. The happy-talking self-congratulatory homebuilders are still overcharging for shiny new cookie cutter and shiny new attached product, and there is still a premium on luxury-ish stuff. But a regular Joe-six-pack type home is selling for about 10% more than I would pay, and handyman specials are going at much less. I don’t know the history so I can’t give a % haircut, but butter-knife catchers appear to be snapping up anything reasonable.
Is 10% over a bad hit to take? At prices near $100K, it’s better to overpay $10K than spend $10K rent waiting for the final price drop, especially if you find something you like, and especially if inflation eats up the down payment cash.
“Now is a good time to buy, seriously.”
-1 — You must learn to be patience, Grasshopper.
“Personally I try to stay healthy, eat right, excercise and ride my bike.”
+1 — Excellent plan; one medical episode can ruin everything.
oxide, I’m glad we are talking about inflation.
Shows, we are ahead of the crowd.
But a lot of info above is false.
RE: a regular Joe-six-pack type home is selling for about 10% more than I would pay, and handyman specials are going at much less.
The continual pumping of residential real estate is all a trap.
The fixed target bagholders for enormous state tax and local deficits will be residential homeowners.
Expect property taxes to blow thru the roof in the next decade as the non-essential “foo-foo” businesses increasingly fall by the wayside diminishing the commercial sector tax base.
Plus, everybody’s got to pay the coming avalanche of public sector pensions
I wonder if people thought Atlantis real estate was dirt-cheap?
aladinsane
“I wonder if people thought Atlantis real estate was dirt-cheap?”
Alad, the koolaid runneth over this morning, enjoy and have at it.
Muir,
I hear you have climbed often in the Sierra Floridita Mountains, in the Sunshine State…
With the high peaks topping out @ 345 feet, you probably tend to be more afraid of widths, than heights?
I believe that you misunderstood, as you have other times.
I was actually agreeing with you.
Be careful where you live, where there is smoke….
‘Be careful where you live, where there is smoke….’
There’s Muir, with a match?
After meeting certain qualifications, you can stake your claim on a vacant house/condo….”improve” the property (do koi ponds count?)…..after, say, 1-2 years, and paying the back taxes, the place is yours!!
Eventually, it would not surprise me if some areas came to this
I think you may be right, in some distressed areas. But if people don’t feel safe or can’t make a decent wage, they won’t take a place even for homesteading.
It’d be nice if some developments were just flattened and returned to farmland or greenspace, too. Undo the exurbs!
You may fire when ready, Gridley.
Muir, which info is false? (serious question). I’m basing this on my observations. I still think the market is like catching butter knives — not the best time to buy, but at least it’s not financial suicide.
And hd74man, if the foo-foo businesses (candle shops) are failing, then there was no revenue to collect taxes on in the first place. If you mean foo-foo as in Home Despot, then I agree with you. And won’t those tax increases just get passed on as part of rent? So you’re taxed no matter what you do.
“With the high peaks topping out @ 345 feet, you probably tend to be more afraid of widths, than heights”
Going from florida ‘peaks ‘ to the somewhat higher Sierras:
I would love to live out in 3 rivers where U can drive up to Wolverton in less than an hr and take the lakes trail to heather lake for a short day excursion or take the alternate route and climb 11600 ft Alta peak as a good long day exercise. And do it on a weekly basis. Have done Alta once before and it took 10 hrs.
There are a few folks who become obsessed with Sierra Peak climbing. I was once one of those and will someday in the future take up this rarified obsession again.
Once bitten by the lore of the high sierras U are hooked forever.
I have heard that Humpherys Peak is one hell of a class 3 thrill.
I wouldn’t pay 100$/sqft just to live in FL. I paid 60$ for hurricane ravaged mosquito infested former swampland in Texas
“No dining out every night, maybe a McDeath once in a while…”
So they’ll have to live like like their parent’s generation? Our family sort of skipped the Baby Boom generation - so having had older parents I can verify firsthand that they and their peers intuitively know every single free coffee refill spot on the planet.
Same here. My parents are barely pre-boomer and my brother and I are post. They eat out a lot. I think my mom has this ridiculous fairness idea going on where since my dad is retired, she should get to stop cooking - very silly, but there it is. I cook way more than she does and I am not all that good at it (neither is she, but she, by necessity, had more standards to call on). Anyway, they coupon, plate share, senior special, etc. all over the place. They can eat out for very little more than eating in, though the food would be healthier if they ate in. It is an art. A rather low brow art, but an art all the same.
I, on the other hand, regularly get over a third off on a grocery bill. I used to be able to do a lot more than that, but healthy food has way fewer sales and coupons and the supermarkets in MD don’t do the same specials as they did in NJ. I remember once getting paid to take away a bottle of soda from the market. The final cost was negative five or six cents. Even if you don’t drink the stuff, you could volunteer to bring soda to a group dinner. It was completely amazing to me that they didn’t put a barrier to that sort of gaming in the cash register program. It would have been trivially easy, but they didn’t do it.
Mike, I do not know what you are talking about.
Unless you mean Homestead/Florida city/Cutler Bay.
Yes, in the cities above you can get houses built in 04 for 115K.
Good luck with that plan, flood zone, the solid waste site on 212th that burns animal carcasses and asbestos….
-
I can back up what I wrote above with links if you need me to.
-
Mike: “If you have a house that’s paid off, at least you won’t be homeless. Now is a good time to buy, seriously. Many places are being sold way below replacement value, at least here in Miami. Lots of houses are being offered at 75% off peak prices.”
“Condos maybe, still tough to find a sucker to pay $200K for a 2/2. I am looking at a house built in 2004. 1450 sqft 3/2 for $115K asking. The place last sold in 3/2006 for $430K. That’s cheaper than I can rent a similar place right now.”
Ok, enough falsehoods.
There are some falsehoods on the above posts.
1st. Forget what you pay for a property as being anything close to what the property appraiser’s office will assess for your property.
2nd. 75% off peak is meaningless. In Miami-Dade outright fraud made prices go up over 200%
I saw this! First hand. This is not something I read about.
I saw straw buyers buy property at 50% above asking price with an illegal kickback at closing and then resell the property a month later at 75% increase and the entire thing repeated in less than 6 months.
I saw this!!!!
3rd. Could we please stop talking about replacement cost?
That is unless we talk around $50-60 sq/ft because that is what it takes to build a house, from permitting to Certificate of occupancy in FL.
4th $100 sq/ft in a decent area in Miami does not exist.
It doesn’t, I do not care who says so.
I’d buy tomorrow 3 houses if that were true.
“Mike, I do not know what you are talking about.
Unless you mean Homestead/Florida city/Cutler Bay.
Yes, in the cities above you can get houses built in 04 for 115K”
In the 33127 Zip Code. Not a great n’hood but not a slum either.
“That is unless we talk around $50-60 sq/ft because that is what it takes to build a house, from permitting to Certificate of occupancy in FL.”
Nope, costs about $100/sqft, especially with all the hurricane codes.
“$100 sq/ft in a decent area in Miami does not exist.”
Depends on what you define as decent. In Coconut Grove you shell out a lot more in the 33127 & 33142 Zip codes you get a decent house for $100/sqft if you can deal with the n’hood.
Mike 33127?
Is that a joke?
Miami Ave, around 36th St.
I lived in Miami 40 years.
-
Let me be very clear for those not familiar with Miami.
This is a ghetto area, next to Liberty City.
Let me be explicit: there’s crack whores in the street corner.
-
Obviously, you were just typing in your keyboard for no reason.
-
I will not reply any further, as anyone in this forum is intelligent enough to research that zip code area for themselves.
You have no credibility for me to even answer your second statement on cost per square feet in Miami. But, I will say this, if you are saying $100 sq/ft that must be what you quote your clients, as after your post that is what I strongly suspect you are: a builder.
(sorry if double post, filter’s probably didn’t like the first post.)
-
Is this a joke Mike?
33127? Miami Ave and 36th street?!!
I lived in Miami 40 years.
For those not familiar with Miami here’s the skinny: 33127 is a place for street hookers that abuse certain substances (I think the filters had trouble with my previous version) in a neighborhood that you do not want to be caught after the sun settles. (filters)
-
As for your $100 sq/ft.
Are you a builder?
You sound like one.
Be honest.
-
If you start telling me about “Midtown” and the “Windmar district” and “fashion district” or “Park Lofts” I’ll have my answer.
test
where have all my posts gone?
As Mr. Greenspan said, “I can guarantee all payments, I can’t guarantee they will buy anything.”
WHERE is the greenbean anyway?
He is so invisible these days, after his hand in creating the mess…
“Does all the money the federal government is borrowing to get the economy out of this disaster mean that the federal government will be too indebted to keep its Medicare and Social Security promises to those now under age 50″…….
The guvmint was already too indebted to keep those promises before this whole financial debacle IMHO, most people just don’t realize it.
“Does all the money the federal government is borrowing to get the economy out of this disaster mean that the federal government will be too indebted to keep its Medicare and Social Security promises to those now under age 50,
I believe in Republican circles this is called “breaking the beast” and may be the ultimate end result of some.
As long as the government continues to write checks in US dollars, people will be forced to accept them.
Now, if those dollars actually BUY anything, is another question.
Won’t younger people eventually inherit the money that is borrowed? It’s not like it is destroyed, it just circulates around?
Government out of money/credit??
That could NEVER happen, right?
After all we are Estados Unidos de América!
The ironic thing is we may have to spend big $$$ waging war against countries that attack us for defaulting on our credit. I don’t see this ending well.
What kind of crap is this? We wage war against Mexico any time recently?
Do you really see that as a possibility? It seems sort of impractical when you talk about countries with nuclear weapons. What I could see is a sort of economic warfare where some nations refuse (or are reluctant) to trade with us.
Yes, but vicious trade/economic wars tend to lead to military wars. Like WWII for instance.
Now that’s an interesting scenario I hadn’t contemplated yet — Credit Default Wars.
Fortunately, there are only a few countries / unions that could pull it off. And if things get to that point, well, those countries aren’t going to be well-off either. I’d guess domestic insurrections would do us all in first.
The most interesting question I’ve seen asked on an internet blog is why does everybody assume that the Great Depression marks the absolute worst that human economic history will ever witness?
I wouldn’t say the worst “human economic history” will ever witness. However, “US Economic History”, I would say, the GD is probably the pinnacle. We will have a more significant event someday (and, no, I DON’T think that this is it), but it will destroy the US (it will mark the end of this country). There’s simply little/no chance that the GD could be repeated without the country falling apart. People are more mobile, the best of this country would leave; the only people remaining would be those too poor to get out. I just don’t see it ever happening again without the country actually failing.
“..the best of this country would leave; the only people remaining would be those too poor to get out.”
Get out and go where? A hut in the Andes? A grass shack on a Pacific island? This economic downturn is worldwide.
Really, no one has to go anywhere.
What they do need to do is to refocus their resources to match their beliefs. The system is gamed to take advantage of people’s expectations - change those expectations and the system breaks down.
It really doesn’t matter where you sleep - it matters where your money goes.
CrackerJim is correct.
And, if some here that site Jared Diamonds’ work, specially “Collapse” would read it without having a hobby horse to ride, they would realize that there is nowhere to run to if things get bad enough.
Oh, and that’s not just for Alad.
Some think that they will be welcomed by the natives in Chile if things get bad enough.
I’m resigned to my fate as I determine it.
Sorry, Alad.
The point that you miss is that if things get bad enough as you predict, you will not have that privilege.
I have a lot of tricks up my sleeve…
“they would realize that there is nowhere to run to if things get bad enough. Oh, and that’s not just for Alad. Some think that they will be welcomed by the natives in Chile if things get bad enough.”
I had a serious conversation with a friend of mine a few months back, he’s, well, freaking out (we are both from upstate NY, but live in Florida and Ohio)… anyway, he asked me what I would do if TSHTF. My opinion is that you take a stand in a town worth defending, and defend it as best you can. I guess I would call this the Jericho plan, for those that saw that series.
This town would be where you have some roots and know everyone: the mayor, police, lawyers, doctors, etc. You all agree to go at it as a town and that’s that. The kind of town where your last name is known, and who you have helped and worked for means something.
I don’t think he liked my answer, but that is my plan. There are 2 towns in my Apocalypse play book, meaning, if I have to die with the sheriff transporting food on horseback, these are the places that I am o.k. with that.
I would really not want to be anywhere in Florida in these scenarios.
Just keep on wishin’ and hopin’.
What’s coming up will make GD1 seem like the good ole days.
The masses are in debt up to over their asses and the politicos are singing that unforgettable lullabye of monetary debasement (inflation) and debt forgiveness (BAILOUT) as cure.
Look for mass unemployment, massive food shortages, massive civil unrest.
Welcome to the jungle of the Balkanization of the USA.
The quick answer is that there are no pictures and movies of previous panics and financial disasters.
Its one thing to talk about the panic of 1872, but another to watch Henry Fonda in the Grapes of Wrath.
Rapes of Graft
‘but another to watch Henry Fonda in the Grapes of Wrath.’
Or even another to read the book. That was some sad readin’, for sure.
“You see it all around you
Good money gone bad
And usually it’s too late when you, realize what you had”
.38 Special in more ways than one.
Generation X, Y, Z will come to understand the extent of the LIES they cherished as truth in their youth.
I’m beginning to believe that the Federal Deficit is a number that doesn’t mean anything, much like the pro football salary cap doesn’t mean anything to the Dallas or Washington.
Citibank rescue… another stake in the heart of the U.S. budget:
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/US-agrees-bail-out-Citigroup/story.aspx?guid={15A026EC-CEA0-4C82-92EC-199B794F0968}
In related news - gold is up another $20. Now up $70 in two days.
Doubled down on my C knife catching last Friday. At 6.00/share, I am exactly even now. Trying to decide if I should be glad to be even and let go of the knife without being hurt, or if I should squeeze the knife a little harder and see if I get a flesh wound, worse or actually catch it. Its not that much speculation $$ anyway so I may let it ride….
Ooh, good move…are you still in?
I am, only because it is relatively small and “free”/speculative money. If it had been money I need, I would have been out this morning and thanked God I got my money back on another one of my stupid ideas :-). I think it will go back down later today but hope in a week or so that it will see 8-9 and I will get out then. I did this with SKF and DUG, and am playing with those profits, but am currently on the hook and upside down in FXP…. This is pure amateur stuff on my part.
No dividends payments for at least 3 years. New bonus plans must be submitted for approval. Forced loan modifications. Citi must wipe out reserves before losses are passed on to government. Citi looks more like a utility than a bank. The government owns it.
This article on Citibank’s Sandy Weill and the new Gilded Age in the NYT totally chapped my bee-hind when I first read it, even though I knew it was a clear indicator of the beginning of the end:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/15/business/15gilded.html
Good article. Thanks for posting it, Frank.
“Citibank rescue… another stake in the heart of the U.S. budget:”
i have a Citi CC with a lot of available credit . Have borrowed a little off of it. They just sent me a letter raising the default rate, as well as the purchase borrow rates to 19.99% apr.
I can wipe them out very easy but will just cut the card and pay down that debt slowly meanwhile making sure i do not defaut on the agreement .
Come on guys. You didn’t do it over the weekend. How do you handle any queries from relatives about the following topics:
a) what should I do with my 401(k)?
b) when do you think house prices are coming back?
c) this recession isn’t going to be any worse than the last one, is it>
d) do you want ice cream with your pie?
The world need to know your answers…..
a) don’t look at me, as I am the one that rents…
b) Maybe 15-20 years from now.
c) T’is but a flesh wound…
d) please.
A) You should have asked me that question 10 months ago! Now the answer is “Keep it invested, and max out your contribution”. Stocks are, IMHO, cheap; this is when you want to maximize your purchases.
B) Inflation adjusted, never. Nominally, 15 years.
C) Yes, it is going to be significantly worse. There’s no bigger bubble to blow, this recession is all about deleveraging, without another bubble, we will just have to let the process run its course. That will be a painful and long process.
D) Sure, why not, we’re all going to die someday!
B) Well NEVER is a long time. How about “not within our lifetimes.” Because only our childrens children will suffer from the illusion that RE prices never go down…. It is partly because we’ve forgotten the lessons of the Great Depression that we’re suffering our current downturn.
I was talking with my Dad last night about this. He said we will never again see a housing bubble.
I asked him if he remembered when the housing and S&L’s collapsed in Texas in the late 80’s. He said he did. I told him he was one of the few people in Texas that remembered that housing could go down in price.
The way we go onto the subject was a discussion of new $250-$350 townhomes that are being built down the street from the Ballpark in Arlington.
http://www.chelseaparklife.com/en/news.html
These guys are very late to the housing bubble party.
a) A little late for that, don’t you think?
b) What do you mean, they are now finally coming back to what they should be, was that your question?
c) That depends, how well prepaired are you?
d) Yes, you better hurry, I hear they aren’t making any more milk.
Most of my family doesn’t have much money, but I’m pretty direct toward those who do or anyone else.
-Dump the 401k funds
-house prices are gonna suck (for you, good for me) for years
-recession may be gone quickly as we move to a depression
I’m moody about the ice cream/pie issue. sometimes I like it, sometimes I don’t. I prefer melted ice cream over frozen ice cream, so that’s a pretty good argument to have some pie with my ice cream. This is the toughest of your questions…
DUMP the 401ks?
Question. Dumping them as in taking them out as cash in my pocket and take the tax hit???
Have been contemplating that as they sit only making 3% in the credit union portion of the funds. Safe is a relative term, I understand, so would it be better to take it all out and put it into my coffee can in the back yard?
No, I meant dump whatever funds you have bought and change your distributions to cash (or money mkt, as near to cash as you can get)
Taking the hit on actually cashing out of the 401k is another issue all together. Personally, right now I think I can do better than anything in my 401k, however I’ve been at my current job only 6 months, so my balance isn’t big enough to worry about.
a) Too late to be asking that question now…….you should have been asking questions a year ago.
b) Not in my lifetime.
c) It isn’t a recession until Bruce Springsteen starts writing songs about it (see album “Born in the USA”). I’m dying to hear his take on the down and out house flipper……
d) It depends on the pie…..
“If I advise you well, it will be your downfall, because you will go the other way.”
My answer, “boy this turkey is good….”
a) what should I do with my 401(k)?
That’s sooooo yesterday - what 401K?
b) when do you think house prices are coming back?
Have you been living under a rock or what?
c) this recession isn’t going to be any worse than the last one, is it?
(Pat’s head condensendingly) No dahlin (rolls eyes)
d) do you want ice cream with your pie?
You asked me all those darn questions when there is pie to eat - with ice cream?! Cuff to the head.
Leigh
Too late to ask this question
Not in your life time
Hell yeah
2 scoops please
a) You can put it in the cash option to avoid further losses, but it is pretty late at this point.
b) Inflation-adjusted, never.
c) It will be worse. But your future actions can make it easier on you. Cut spending and save.
d) Let me see if I have a lactaid pill.
I read a short article in the Financial Times by Richard Duncan about once again linking the dollar to a new gold standard. Is there some reason we can’t develop that over the next twenty years? The gist was that ever since Nixon separated the dollar from gold in 1971, that act freed central banks across the globe to deal in “funny money.”
How big of a clustermess is Citi compared to Lehman or AIG?
With a $300 billion plus loan guarantee, I’m thinking comparable, if not worse.
The FDIC is seizing small and not-so-small banks every week. Why don’t they seize Citi?
Is it because Citi is too big for the gov’t? Would the FDIC blow up?
Too big to save, so we’ll just throw cash at it?
Could be, as far as too much for the guvmint. One or two big blowups and bye bye FDIC reserves maybe. Maybe loan guarantees make it easier to hide losses and drags them out longer.
I don’t think the government has the cojones to fire 53,000 people. The best they could do was 11,000 air traffic controllers. They need the private sector for some things;)
Because if you seize Citi, it is a credit-default-swap triggering event. These bailouts aren’t happening just to eff the taxpayer; they’re also happening because so many of these institutions have trillions in CDS instruments linking each other. When Lehman went BK, all these other institutions were forced to pay up cash to cover bets; if Citi fails, you’d probably see the ‘chosen’ winner banks like JPMorgan, Wells, etc go south, too.
A better question might be…how does a government that keeps acting under cover of darkness (usually Friday evenings or Sunday nights) expect to inspire confidence?
I fully expect Darkmouth Hank to say something pithy along these lines…
“We hadn’t used $350 Billion of the previous giveaway, and it was just like so much low hanging fruit, too much temptation. We had to give it away to somebody and Citi needed it.”
WSJ
Obama Eyes $500 Billion in Stimulus; Paulson Weighs Ramping Up Aid Again
Bush Says More Corporate Rescues Possible
…
Mr. Obama’s selection of Mr. Geithner for Treasury secretary has, in effect, given his administration a greater role in the current handling of the financial crisis. That’s because Mr. Geithner has already been a close partner of Mr. Paulson in managing the bailouts in his role as New York Fed president.
The selection of Mr. Geithner is providing comfort to Treasury officials, who view his selection as an indication they will be able to push ahead with using more of the $700 billion rescue fund to respond to the financial crisis than perhaps Mr. Paulson had suggested last week. Treasury’s immediate focus is on establishing a program, along with the Federal Reserve, that would help increase the availability of auto loans, student loans and credit cards — which Mr. Paulson believes will help alleviate strains in the consumer borrowing market.
…
Sigh,
Leigh
Amen, ej. That’s why this whole bailout business has my anger level going into the stratosphere. If “they” just left it alone, things could bottom out quickly (I’m the type who likes to yank the bandaid off fast) and we could build back up from there (or not). No, this crap does NOT inspire confidence. Psychologically, the message is being sent that the same crooks and criminals are in charge, so it is just going to keep on sucking.
Geithner. What a steaming pile of change.
Our gov is just privatizing all banks, small ones and folding them into big banks and will control all of us, all things, and when the Big event occurs, we will all be just yacking on the hbb knowing what was happening but really not getting the big picture of what is occuring.
The water is getting really hot in this pan on the stove.Don’t you feel it?
I am taking off the foil hat and putting it back into the foil drawer.
“…Responding to criticism that Citigroup was getting special treatment that would not be available to another institution, Mr Crittenden insisted that the arrangement was deliberately packaged in “a plain vanilla flavour” so it could be applied to other lending institutions….”
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/447938ee-b9f0-11dd-8c07-0000779fd18c.html
How was everybody’s “Weakened @ Bernanke’s?”
Oh boy.
The Dow Jokes hits a new low…:)
“How was everybody’s ‘Weakened @ Bernanke’s?’”
OK, this is sheer genius.
Have to agree, lol.
www dot cnbc dot com/id/27886148
Somali Pirates Cut Ransom Demands by $10 Million
Ransom deflation?
Let’s trade Hank Paulson for the oil, then HE can give them the ten mill.
They did the math, and figured that if they didn’t cut the ransom, it would soon get to a point where it would be cheaper for the owners to let the pirates KEEP the tanker.
no kidding.
really took the wind outta their sales I bet. (har har)
Did ya hear the speculation on tv that the piracy ‘thing’ is being blamed on Johnny Depp for his pirate movies?
Yep, that did it.
only a tv generation could believe that…
Never mind the oil, the tanker itself must be worth a couple million. And the pirates could use the trick out the tanker to use as a base camp to conduct more raids, a la Waterworld.
It’s more likely that somebody threatened to blow up the tanker, oil and all. That’s why the ransom was dropped.
Nightline last Friday had a piece on a brothel in a Las Vegas.
They have had to cut prices prices.
Do they offer a Frequent John Card or a Club Card (a la grocery store)?
It would made the professor proud.
Deflation in a brothel!
As many of us here probably know, there are times when getting it “free” is too high a price to pay
Its never free.
Reminds me of a rodney dangerfield joke…
“I went to a prostitute last night. I dropped my pants, she dropped her price.”
“A hooker once told me she had a headache.”
The Somali pirates have heard of great real estate bargains in the Dar al Harb, they want to flip that tanker ASAP & invest the ransom money in Florida condos. You read it here first. Then they will meet some real pirates.
Captain! We are being MARKED DOWN!
Treasury Traders Paid to Borrow as Fed Examines Repos (Update2)
By Liz Capo McCormick
Nov. 24 (Bloomberg) — Owners of Treasuries may soon get paid to borrow as the U.S. tries to break a logjam in the $7 trillion-a-day repurchase market.
Treasuries are in such high demand that investors are lending cash for next to nothing to obtain the securities as collateral through so-called repos, which dealers use to finance their holdings. The problem is many parties involved in repos aren’t delivering the bonds because there is no penalty for not doing so, causing “fails” to exceed $5 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. …”
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=anf.Bv7jZkTM&refer=news
Not a good thing.
An excellent comment from Mr. John Hempton
http://brontecapital.blogspot.com/
Too much surfeit begets a surfeit of forfeit.
Wall Street traders appear to be happy over the announcement that Uncle Sam has agreed to taking a stake in Citigroup’s misfortunes.
MarketWatch dot com
November 24 2008 9:13 A.M. EST
Futures applaud Citi lifeline
Citigroup shares rocket more than 50% in the pre-market
Robust buying at the open takes shape, carrying over from Friday’s late rally. Investors take assurance from Washington’s move to provide backstop for battered blue chip Citigroup.
Just means all the CDS that Citi sold will be fully funded as other corporate bonds default.
What I was thinking. Few weeks back Citi was stating that the it’s CDS exposure should GM file for BK would be minimal. Surrrreeee…..
“America is a country where they have freedom of speech but everyone says the same thing.”
Alexis de Tocqueville
So the kids being left alone all day with the candy jar looks inquisitively at the candy jar owners and says:
“Where is all the candy”?
Well, where IS all the candy?! How’d you KNOW? Dammit, I swear I had a couple bags in my desk and it’s ALL GONE.
Oh, wait–you made one of them ‘metaphor’ thingies. Right.
Ah, screw metaphors! Where’s my candy!? Where are you, my precious?! CANDYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!
Dude, where’s my TARP?
Curves in the wrong places
Published: November 24 2008 02:00 | Last updated: November 24 2008 02:00
Yes, you too America can have perfectly flat yields in less than 12 months - hundreds of satisfied fixed income strategists guarantee it!…”
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/1/2261fcf6-b9c7-11dd-99dc-0000779fd18c.html
Wanted: borrower of last resort
Published: November 23 2008 17:57 | Last updated: November 23 2008 17:57
Inflation is dropping like a stone. Just as it shot up when commodity prices soared, it is now tumbling. Unless oil and other raw materials stage a surprising recovery, annual price growth may even turn negative in some rich countries. On a monthly basis, US consumer prices fell by 1 per cent in October. …”
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8572cbba-b975-11dd-99dc-0000779fd18c.html
“…The lesson that must be learnt from this disaster is that “free market” capitalism under a fiat money regime does not produce the same blessings (sustainable prosperity) that are produced by true free market capitalism within a monetary system anchored by gold. When President Nixon severed the link between the dollar and gold, he changed the nature of the Anglo-American economic model and ultimately destroyed it….”
FT
“When President Nixon severed the link between the dollar and gold, he changed the nature of the Anglo-American economic model and ultimately destroyed it….”
No surprise if historians ultimately pin the blame for this period of American economic history on Nixon.
Sounds plausible and simple enough to make a good story.
or Roosevelt.
“No surprise if historians ultimately pin the blame for this period of American economic history on Nixon.”
Yes, but I find myself wondering why everyone ignores the fact that we had business cycles, bubbles, panics, and busts, all while we _were_ on the gold standard.
Yes, but I find myself wondering why everyone ignores the fact that we had business cycles, bubbles, panics, and busts, all while we _were_ on the gold standard.
Yeah, I know.
And I’m not sure there’s enough physical gold to make all the transactions that need to happen everyday.
And do merchants, government, and the people really want to go back to dealing with PMs on a regular basis? I’m thinking no.
Look, credit happens with or without a gold standard.
There are two unrelated problems here - credit bubbles and government intervention to devalue currency to mitigate the credit bubble.
The former happens in ALL regimes; the latter is sorta kinda modern - they tried that with gold too by devaluing.
Is this so complicated to grasp?
Not at all, FPSS—-I totally agree. It was just less convenient and more noticable when you had to devalue under the gold-standard.
Bill Fleckeenstein 11/24/08
Support intelligent solutions, not house prices
Now for some thoughts on the bailout plans and why they wouldn’t work. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson (despite his truly heroic efforts) and the government appear not to understand the root cause of so much of the financial turmoil — that being the size and scope of the housing bubble. They seem to be operating under the misguided notion that they need to prop up house prices in order to solve the underlying problem.
However, that is dead wrong. The problem is that house prices are still too high relative to incomes. And recently tightened lending standards will put additional pressure on home prices. The price of housing will eventually decline to a level that can be supported by incomes.
A more intelligent approach toward ameliorating the mess would be for the financial institutions and the government to try to figure out just where that level of house prices might be and what the size of the losses would be. Then it could be decided how the losses might be shared among the government, the public and the financial institutions. I’ve seen variations on some creative approaches, not the least of which is trying to find a way to allow folks to stay in their homes, if possible.
Salute the unsung savers
In addition, something must be done for the people who have behaved prudently. They should get some sort of reward, just as those who behaved imprudently are going to receive aid. Folks who have lived within their means deserve some amount of tax-free saving, which would help instill the right kind of attitude in consumers at large. That way, no one will feel taken advantage of.
As it now stands, the government expects the prudent to bail out the reckless, which is completely unjust and impossible.
“Salute the unsung savers”
Later this week the eyes of the world will be on the consumers. I will argue that those with savings have more power today than they realize. Dollars witheld from the machine this week will make an especially strong statement - your dollar is your vote.
Besides, after reading what some of you posted this weekend, saving has long since stopped being a mere “choice” and may now be a matter of survival.
Don’t get angry - don’t spend!
Dollars witheld from the machine this week will make an especially strong statement - your dollar is your vote.
Absolutely.
Let’s kick off the holiday shopping season not with a bang, but a whimper …
We already know what happens when people don’t spend. We conducted that little pilot project in late 2001 when folks stayed home with their families post-9/11. Low-wage workers lost their jobs within weeks, interest rates went to 1% (0% on cars), and Bush had to beg us to spend spend spend.
Won’t work this time.
You’re suggesting we follow Bush’s Dictum that Consumerism Is Patriotism?
Debt Is Wealth?
Liabilities Are Assets?
We’ve seen how well that particular economic plan works out, haven’t we?
No, sorry. I’m saying we’re doomed either way. If we spend all our money, we go broke. If we save all our money, businesses go broke and the g-ment steps in to take our magic tax dollars to save the businesses, and we go broke anyway.
“As it now stands, the government expects the prudent to bail out the reckless, which is completely unjust and impossible.”
Hey the housing bubble isn’t like welfare, under which a majority of the beneficiaries were Black. These reckless people have rights!
“…something must be done for the people who have behaved prudently. They should get some sort of reward, just as those who behaved imprudently are going to receive aid. Folks who have lived within their means deserve some amount of tax-free saving, which would help instill the right kind of attitude in consumers at large.”
The Old Order Amish would like to receive cash… instead of a check… at the local grain storage co-op. They are buying stainless steel cans from the .99 stores.
Hmmm, we here in Texas have $1.11 stores. (I kid you not.)
“The price of housing will eventually decline to a level that can be supported by incomes.”
Uh, how ’bout supported by a single’s income?
Come on, not everybody is paired off into little couples and single females like feeling grand too.
And of those who are paired off, not everyone wants self and spouse to be busting their b%&*&$ for 30 years, constantly worried about layoffs/relocations/etc. just to afford a frickin’ house. What kind of life is that?
EXCUSE ME, single female, you don’t belong in a house. We don’t make houses for your kind anyway. You belong in a cute little condo, don’t you think? You can paint your wall in HGTV mauve, pot some ivy, and sip tea while looking out the window and dreaming of Prince Charming.
House. ha ha ha. Who do you think you are?
[/snark, but not far off the advertising messages I saw in the big city.]
“In addition, something must be done for the people who have behaved prudently.”
‘Everything works much better when wrong decisions are punished and good decisions make you rich.’
– Anna Schwartz –
Anna Schwartz for President!
It’s one of my favorite quotes of recent times…
IMHO ,the problem started with Paulson and BB lending short term Fed money on bad paper to Investment firms and Banks . This was the first major mistake . This set the stage for all the bail outs because the paper was bad .
So, the approach that should of been taken is a seizure of all
Banks and investment firms by Bk or the government take -over. The taxpayers would own what was let of these firms and the equity holders ,stockholder and creditors and investors would of ate it . FDIC should of been honored as well as government backed insured accounts .
So the taxpayers would of become owners of Major banks and when times got good again the Banks (owned by the Nation for a time ) would than be sold off to private capital and the taxpayers would
of got a percentage of their money back . Paulsons and BB attempt to save investors is a misplaced goal of a Government . Keeping the utility of a banking system in general should of been the only goal
of the Feds and the Treasury . As it stands now all the bag-holders get a free ride including the liar loan borrowers that helped create the mess . BB and Paulson have created a situation whereby more loss will take place because everyone now wants bail-outs without
penalty . The government could of re-modified loans that made sense for any bank they took over and all the rest would of gone into foreclosure . This would of been the least costly way to approach this situation . While the gamblers and the investors would of been the most penalized by the way I think it should be handled ,and it would of resulted in some liability lawsuits ,at least there would be less
Moral hazard ,and less tax burden for the future .
You don’t see Paulson and BB giving a damn about the loss people are taking on the stock market on their 401K’s ,and Paulson and BB should of had the same attitude about the Banks and investment firms . The systems and laws were already in place as to how this mess was suppose to come down or be de-leveraged ,or how losses
were to be taken, based on risk . While I agree we need a Banking and credit system that can function ,the banks aren’t doing it because it doesn’t make sense to do it to the extent we did in boom times .
The risk of the government owning companies until private money
was willing to buy these Companies would of been a necessary evil for a time because some functions are necessary, like a banking system. The problem now is that we are just giving these Companies money while the government has no control over what they will do with the money . All government bail out funds have been a waste because
they just changed who the bagholders were and transferred the loss to the taxpayers . Bailing this out the correct way would of created
the punishment that is being avoided by the Paulson /Feds Plan .
Now the government needs to decide if its worth it to inject capital into the Auto-makers .
Fleckenstein is much too mild in his statements. They seem to be operating under the misguided notion that they need to prop up house prices in order to solve the underlying problem. I prefer to summarize the situation as, “The Zombie has eaten their brains.”
Somalian pirates sell the cargo they seize for a fraction of what it’s worth, wile Wall Street pirates have a bunch of bad loans that are seized up.
Advantage to the Somalians…
Barbarous Pirates, it’s time to joist the holy roger!
Our day of ruling the high seize is coming soon…
Aaaaaaaarrrrrrr…….
The French and the North African pirates taught the US (and maybe even Gunboat Tom Jefferson) that isolationism was a useless strategy in the end of the 1700s. I wonder if the next administration is paying attention…
Those Somalians need a leader, kind of like we have in America. Wait, who’s in charge?
Those Somalians need a leader, kind of like we have in America. Wait, who’s in charge? The Kenyan candidate is waiting in the wings.
A friend who works in finance IT told me this over the weekend.
There is a chance, that when Comdex Gold Futures come due this Friday that most or all of the holders will ask for delivery. There isn’t anywhere near enough gold available to fulfill this.
IF this happens, the gold futures market is essential dead, gold only sells as a tangible asset and the price explodes.
Any one else hear anything like this?
Yep, short positions have dropped hard. The .gov will probably step in and force cash settlement which will break the comex. The Comex is done; Dubai is going to be the gold exchange of the future. They won’t allow the naked shorting and manipulation.
Silver is an even bigger version of the same situation. Up over 10% today. I had hoped to buy another 1000 oz bar under 10. Not gonna happen.
Proud professioral deflationista pussycats getting beaten with golden buggy whips. Heh.
These are testable hypotheses, and we don’t even have to wait too long to test them.
An hypothysis ia an attempt to explain something that is observed, not what-if scenarios from imagination.
Here is an hypothesis: All commodity bubbles formed during massive global credit expansion burst when credit expansion stops.
Testable. and we won’t have to wait long.
Is the biggest expansion of credit in history over?
Well, they’ve made a very specific claim: “Many” long futures buyers will ask for delivery, and the Comex will step in anf force cash settlement this Friday (11/28).
This is an extraordinarily specific and precise claim. We shall see is the response because we only have to wait until Friday.
I will be playing with my grandson on Friday. It will be a double good day.
Show me the money!
Too bad I will be out of communication range for most of Friday at our cottage to find out how my GLD, Krugerrand stash and rest of my investments held up. I am sure it would rock the markets for a while and hurt the stock market so it would be negative for me, personally. I just wonder how much demand for delivery there will be in the large COMEX quantities. At 100 oz a pop, they are not all that affordable for the average investor, and if you need to sell less, not all that easy to get into a more reasonable/exchangeable form (thus goes my lamebrain theory of the decoupling of 100 oz COMEX spot from 1oz physical coin price…). Maybe worth a drive on Friday to get back into cell phone range.
I’m pretty sure I could turn a 100oz bar into more reasonable-sized/exchangable form with a hack-saw and a bench-vise. Wouldn’t quite have the seal-of-approval of a nice gov’t mint though, would it?
Quite true, who would take your hacked off pieces of “gold.”
I wish the Comex was publicly tradable. (as in buying puts on it)
Would this event not be reflected in GLD?
Short CME, or buy puts….
The Lad man has been alluding to something like this for a few weeks now, IIRC.
Any exchange can determine settlement in a tight market. There will be no default. They can make the gold contract settle as cash, liquidation only and or gold if available. Although a short squeeze is possible, It is probably a non event.
What he said.
And the short positions dropping just means that many people rolled over their contracts to the next delivery date.
They do it the week before the expiration typically, as Turkey Day makes this week rather illiquid.
According to the nymex web site, there are only 80 contracts open for the november gold; versus 92000 contracts for December. As I read this, essentially all of the november contracts have allready been closed out. Is this correct?
Similarly for silver there are 40 open contracts for November versus 25000 for December.
I am not that familiar with the operation of futures market, so someone please correct me if I am missing something.
As I read this, everyone has allready settled out of their November contracts and there wont be any short squeeze.
Please, this is the gold brigade. Facts are not allowed.
As I pointed out the contracts were rolled.
but….but…
Comment by aladinsane
2008-11-06 08:13:21
For those of you keeping score @ home, November 28th is judgement day for the Comex.
He’s a gold dealer, and hence a liar.
He is here to spread fear no different than the NAR people. He has been caught out and exposed for the duplicitous rascal that he is.
Pussy Galore,
You’ve repeatedly called me a liar, why?
You’re a gold dealer and you’re here p*mping gold. We can no more believe you than we can believe a NAR chump.
You conveniently ignore all facts that don’t fit your hypothesis. This is like the NAR liars and thieves except you’re a gold-sellin’ liar and thief.
Pussy,
Somehow, my timely recommendations make me a liar and a thief in your twisted world of making ridiculous accusations that can’t be backed up, except by using innuendo.
You are rather pathetic.
Possibly.
But I’ve blown your cover and I’m calling you out.
From now on, you are going to have to present reason rather than preying on fear, and I’m on to you. I’m gonna make sure that you don’t prey on the fears and weaknesses of people who don’t understand finance.
I think the laddie’s opinionated to a near-religious-fervor degree. But I haven’t seen any evidence that he is a gold dealer. My take is that he’s just “all in”, which makes sense if he believes that strongly.
Personally, the scarcity in the coin markets makes me a little nervous, and I wish I had picked up some as an insurance policy, which is how I view it. I don’t expect total societal collapse, though, so I wouldn’t need a lot for that.
I also expect that paper and physical markets should not and cannot stay uncoupled forever; the mints can arbitrage the difference.
Here’s a nugget from a holiday shopping fluff piece over on Yahoo!
“In a down economy, people are willing to get up at 3 a.m. and sit in a line outside a store.” said Ellen Davis, spokeswoman for the National Retail Federation
This begs the question: would they line up at 3 a.m. to get a job?
FWIW, people were doing this at the height of the bubble, even getting into fights to buy a lousy PC.
An acquaintance’s mom was dying of cancer, and her (= dying mom’s) concern was the upcoming Christmas season.
Seriously, there is something really wacked with people and their priorities.
Well, jeeze, she was DYING. That can kinda put a crimp in your style, I understand, not to mention put a crimp in your standard lucidity level.
Now, if your acqaintance’s main concern had been Christmas, while her mom was dying—THAT would seriously be whacked.
If I were dyin’, my first concern would not be the mall. It would be to eat well, and try and make fun of as many people before I get shuffled off this mortal coil.
‘It would be to eat well, and try and make fun of as many people before I get shuffled off this mortal coil.’
So, just like right now, actually. And I approve of that.
Hey, I’m just preparing ahead of time.
‘Hey, I’m just preparing ahead of time’
What, you like some sort of Boy Scout? A cruel, gourmand Boy Scout?
Say, now THERE would be some exciting badges for decorating along the little outfit sash. One badge could be a pot of risotto, and another, say for advanced snark, could be an image of someone crying. Hahahahaa! Pretty! And also more valuable life skills than making fires with flints and all that other nonsense, come to think of it.
FPSS, there’s a lot to be said for living each day as if it’s your last… So I was glad to see your description of your last days matching up very nicely with your normal every-day blog-personality here…
MARKETWATCH FIRST TAKE
Paradigm problem
Commentary: The TARP was supposed to prevent Citigroup-like debacles
By MarketWatch
Last update: 9:55 a.m. EST Nov. 24, 2008
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — The Troubled Asset Relief Program was supposed to be the bailout to end all bailouts — that was, until early Monday.
TARP got eclipsed when the government agreed to backstop an estimated $306 billion in potential losses at Citigroup Inc. (C 6.17, +2.40, +63.7%) , the embattled financial-services company and Dow Jones Industrial Average component.
Was shopping @ Target yesterday, and somebody had mentioned they changed their credit-card terminals, and bingo-they’ve got new ones that can take multiple pieces of plastic.
I was hoping that the woman in front of me would have to resort to it, but she paid cash.
I asked the cashier why the new terminals?, and she said “some people need to ’spread’ payments over a few cards.”
I wish i had more than one card so i could use this new technology and hold up the line putting small amounts on each card. Thats why i still use checks instead of debit cards. It pisses alot of people off.
How exactly does holding up the line benefit you?
I think he answered that.
It pisses alot of people off.
Good answer.
’sides that, it is a good old fashioned way of watching where your money goes and when.
Mom still uses checks. Am considering the same.
I just use a spreadsheet. You don’t need to use outmoded technology to keep track.
Sorry, some of the ol’-people Luddite-stuff gets on my nerves. Whenever I hear a “back in my day”, I have an inbuilt urge to rip out their eyeballs with plastic forks.
why plastic?
How is a check different then a debit card for “watching where you money goes.” Do you really need to see you canceled checks? I can see not using a credit card, but I use my debit card all the time.
It hurts more. Particularly when it snaps off.
Plus plastic is ‘newfangled’. See, that’s like adding insult to injury.
Did anybody else picture the Scorpions’ when they saw the words “eyeballs” and “forks” used in the same sentence?
I would if I but knew what or who the ‘Scorpions’ were. How about you tell the iggerant me.
Oh, I do have a lollipop with a little scorpion in it. I haven’t eaten it yet, no matter how starving for candy I get. ‘Course, the day is young, and all the rest of my candy appears to be gone…
I just dug it out of my desk and took a look. It appears to be ‘lemon and scorpion’ flavored. Yum yum.
“Did anybody else picture the Scorpions’ when they saw the words “eyeballs” and “forks” used in the same sentence?”
I did. Awesome album.
“I would if I but knew what or who the ‘Scorpions’ were.”
Oh, stop being so coy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naSPSTZsHYA
Or, if you prefer to watch Asian headbangers lovin’ the German metal, try this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UqCkFTtOOs
‘I did. Awesome album.’
Oh, yes, well THAT. I knew that.
Show-off.
“How exactly does holding up the line benefit you?”
Another answer to your question is the fact that when I go grocery shopping I have to wait while the cashier credits stuff to the person in front of me because they are paying with food stamps and dont have enough to pay the bill. So, if I can contribute to holding up of the line, it makes me happy instead of getting upset.
“I wish i had more than one card so i could use this new technology and hold up the line putting small amounts on each card. Thats why i still use checks instead of debit cards. It pisses alot of people off.”
I’m sorry you’re so miserable. Let us all hope that you don’t project your anger in a more harmful way in the future.
Please read comment above. Its all in fun, adding to the frustration of others behind me. Most the time I dont start it, I just happen to add to it.
I recently stood in line behind a woman at WaWa as she pulled out a two-inch thick stack of credit cards and handed them to the cashier one after the other until one was approved.
This for a purchase less than 10 bucks - chips, sodas, candy. She showed no apparent problem with this process…laughing as she asked the teller…try this one.
She waddled out of the store, hopped in a newish full-size SUV and distributed her “borrowed-to-buy” goodies to a couple of chunky well(poorly) fed kids in the back.
I feel sorry for the kids…she’s obviously too far gone.
Oh. My. God.
Unreal.
What an image, Watching… Thx for sharing.
Dollar discount sale — get ‘em while they last.
I’ll sell you some ZWD.
UPDATE:Bush:Safeguarding Financial System 1st Step To Econ Recovery
WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- Hours after the federal government came to the aid of Citigroup Inc. (C), U.S. President George W. Bush said he is prepared to make more dramatic moves to protect the battered financial system.
No, seriously take my wife…
I’m sure you’re not the first person to ask for a `sterilized intervention’ TARP-style for their spouse.
Yeah, this “protecting the financial system” stuff is making me feel so much better….
Rally unsustainable. Lasted 4 hours.
It’s not over till it’s over.
Given the absurd blather coming out, the Messiah promising an “unprecedented plan”, and the ’shrubbery calling this bailout a `bluprint’, I’m not sure I’d like to be short right now.
Long for the intermediate term. There will be a time to short again but not right now.
i’m kinda thinking there may be continued runup until Obama’s policies have a chance to fail.
Or at least the new years hangover wears off…
Yep. I would not short right now.
Take it up boys, we’ll short you later.
By the way, I’ve been doing research to support your 1983 thesis. Lots of info, some charts showing a clear upturn in credit expansion about that time, but still no solid info about why.
Fed funds target rate started dropping about that time, but only back to historical norms.
Reserve requirements changed, but its hard to tell if they became more or less stringent. Carter passed the MCA that forced banks to go federal and tightened up reserve requirements with a gradual looseneing through the eighties, but again it was still tougher than historical…
Been busy with school, but I plan to hit it hard over thanksgiving. There’s a tidbit about the Fed changing its focus from control of M1 to a broader focus of money and credit that I’m gonna chase down next. Off hand I can’t figure why that’s important yet…
Start with what the Fed does. The Fed does not print money. It lowers the cost of money “below” the free market rate which is the functional equivalent (but not literal equivalent) of printing money.
Ah, I think I see what you’re getting at, FPSS. 1983 was when the Fed’s balance sheet began a rather significant up-trend relative to it’s long-term trend-line of the 60’s and 70’s.
So, with the Fed’s engine spewing out liquidity, laundered and multiplied through the fractional-lending system, we had the impetus for a major credit bubble.
Obama’s team’s economic plan: Inflation or bust.
Article posted below suggests Paulson will go back to congress for the rest of the cash. My guess is the markets will crash right before he does this in order to pressure congress into giving him the cash with no strings.
I concur. Goodness knows that whenever somebody wanted to drop interest rates, The Market would boom right on cue like the trained dog that it is. Surely The Market can play dead just as well.
Question is: will it work? In September, Paulson & Co. demanded money Right This Minute! or else the world would blow up then and there. Two weeks later, still no blow up. Turns out they were sort of crying wolf.
If Paulson threatens Armegeddon again, Congress will tell Armegeddon to wait for the O-man. The Xmas season is already shot anyway.
Bailout and rally, bailout and rally, bailout and rally. Everything up- gold, oil, DOW, Nasdaq, S&P. Could we get another commodities bubble perhaps? Is there anyway these wealthy elitists can party on like it’s 2005 while the public moves towards starvation? They’re sure trying. This is disturbing.
The supply side wealthy elite will stop at nothing to re-flate this Walmart raft to keep wage earners on their borrow and spend treadmill. They refuse to acknowledge the failure of reaganomics as they all jump ship.
The median home price plunged 11.3% to $183,300 in October from $206,700 a year earlier. That was the largest tumble since NAR records began in 1968.
WSJ: Jeff Bater
The Swaps are widening dramatically in US Treasuries. This would normally be cause to worry (What me worry?).
This is headline news, but it is inaccurately reported. The US Treasuries can go into technical default on the CDS without going into default on the actual treasuries. I have not finished the calculations for the profit potential in long treasuries/long swaps but it could be quite large relative to the risk of losing the premium for the CDS.
Just an observation.
America’s about to get declawed.
Really appreciate your observations and input, hoz. Thank you!
Why pay anything…
$149,000.00
COMPLETELY UNFINISHED PROPERTY. NEEDS MAJOR WORK! NO PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY. NO LEGAL ELECTRICITY TO PROPERTY. BATHROOMS ARE NOT FINISHED, KITCHEN IS NOT FINISHED, NO FLOORING , NO CABINETS, NO PAVED ROAD TO PROPERTY. RADIENT HEATING SYSTEM NOT COMPLETE. HAS ISSUES W/THE SOIL AND RETAINING WALL ON THE HILL BEHIND THE HOME.
Precious mettle is rare for good reason.
This would make anice graph re: when to buy again.
Sale History
10/31/2008: $217,000
09/30/2005: $292,500
06/16/2004: $233,500
05/25/2001: $130,000
10/19/1995: $112,500
I guess Paulson was wrong when he said he’d leave it to the next administration to spend the remains of the 700 billion dollar bailout. Apparently things are getting worse.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20081124/pl_nm/us_paulson
Not that it will do anygood but I’ve been writing reps begging for a little accountability and clarity on where this money is going.
Okay, I’m not going to waste time with wikki or anything else, I figure someone here will know the answer, just like alad and NYCity could instantly tell me the quote/source I was looking for awhile ago, after I wasted a whole bunch of time looking for it online.
Here’s my question: Yesterday I got out a few of my many knives and fondled them, with genuine love and affection, in preparation for Eating Time this Thursday, and I noticed that the wood handles of some of the older ones are looking parched. What do I use on them? Shall I use tung-oil? Or mineral oil? Or what shall I annoint them with? Besides the blood of the deserving.
Oh, and there’s one or two that seem to have horn or bone handles. What do I use on those? Gotta keep my knives happy, you know. A happy knife is a ….jeeze, I forget the saying. Something or other.
Anyhow, just someone gimme the benefit of knowledge.
Happy knives is a … warm gun?
Olympia,
Don’t use mineral oil, it will never dry. You probably could use tung oil or linseed oil if they are pure. Hard for you to know. “Boilded linseed oil” has nasties in it. Both will smell for a long time, and so will your hands after you touch the wood. Turkey smell is best without that. I would thin down some varnish 50/50. It will soak in yet dry fast. Polish it up with a scrubby sponge after it dries.
No idea on the bone handles. How many knives does it take to slice up one bird?
Thank you!
I DON’T want nasties, or a lingering oil smell on or near my food. Nohow.
What kind of varnish? I have lots of kinds of varnish, and I have linseed oil, the raw, and the ‘boilded’, but you nix that. So what kind of varnish do you mean, like a shellac, or a polyurethane?
As for ‘How many knives does it take to slice up one bird’?
What does THAT have to do with anything? The point is, I love knives. A good knife is a thing of beauty. It doesn’t have to have a point–now, no stupid jokes from anyone, nyuk nyuk— I mean beauty doesn’t have to have a reason to exist. It just is, and we can but be grateful to observe it.
I can’t believe I’ve never expounded upon knives to you all. Jeeze, man, knives is like a religion. Like cast iron skillets.
“Both will smell for a long time, and so will your hands after you touch the wood.”
Maybe the greatest line ever typed on this blog and there was no reaction? Shameful!
Oly, I had a fella over for dinner the other night.
He made me dinner and let my henkels soak in water. Of course I let him know i was watching him like a hawk from now on and I guess I better get some linseed oil too.
P.s. He stained two stainless steel pans. Does that burn stuff come off SS?
use an sos pad and you can get it back to a shine.
Oly, this site recommends finishing with beeswax polish after the mineral oil. *shrug* I dunno, but it sounds reasonable for a sealer after the mineral oil.
Hmmm. That does sound reasonable. I will give it a try on one, and let you know how it goes. I can tell you are a fellow who loves his knives.
Hey, have you tried this on one of YOUR knives?
Nothing is more pleasing than a fine edge. Wood carving is my passion. I make my own chisels and knives. I would use poly cut 50% with paint thinner. Not mineral oil. If you like the wax, just use the wax. Mineral oil is what you soak a baseball bat in before going downtown.
I don’t have any wooden handle knives. I guess all mine (folding knives, kitchen knives and a long 8 inch buck) are synthetic material…
But I agree with Skye, a fine edge is nice. I still remember honing my first knife for hours and finally getting a really, really sharp edge for the first time. It’s a skill I have actually lost somewhat due to lack of practice.
In the last year however, I’ve started shaving with a straight razor, so I am sort of relearning how to put a fine edge on a blade, except this time its a very, very fine edge.
And skye, one issue with the poly vs mineral oil, is that this knife is going to be handled with food. So from that standpoint would you not prefer food-grade mineral oil over polyeurothane? That’s why I liked the bees wax idea. It would provide a decent sealant and still be food-grade.
Mineral oil is an appropriate product, and is not supposed to “dry” but soak into the wood. After application, it’s best to let the knife sit for several hours and, if all has soaked in, reapply until the wood will no longer absorb it. Then, the excess is wiped off and the knife cleaned.
Trust your instincts as you already had your answer- mineral oil. Even furniture polish will do if that’s all you have. I NEVER put my cutlery in the dishwasher because it’s terrible for the handles. Hand wash only, and they’ll fare much better.
Peter Schiff on gold:
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/133689/Peter-Schiff-‘Opportunity-of-a-Lifetime’-in-Gold-Intl.-Assets—-Not-U.S.-Stocks?tickers=%5Edji,%5Egspc,GLD,EWH,EWA,EWS,UDN
“Peter Schiff: ‘Opportunity of a Lifetime’ in Gold, Intl. Assets — Not U.S. Stocks”
Wow, DOW up nearly 550 with less than 15 minutes to go. Looks like privatize the profits, socialize the risks is exactly what the doctor ordered, for the rich people anyway.
DOW up nearly 550 with less than 15 minutes to go More white noise produced by people drunk on Kool Aid. It’ll go down again before the end of the year, the price fluctuations will continue.
Was shopping @ Target yesterday, and somebody had mentioned they changed their credit-card terminals, and bingo-they’ve got new ones that can take multiple pieces of plastic.
I asked the cashier why the new terminals?, and she said “some people need to ’spread’ payments over a few cards.”
——————————————————————————
Wow, you just can’t make this stuff up! Sometimes I think I’m living in a “Twilight Zone” episode….
My economic bailout plan-
As long as the government is gung-ho on the fathomless debt thing, why not give money to those who it belongs in lieu of lending it to entities that may not be able to pay it back, putting us even more in debt?
If the government gave me back every penny of my Social Security that I and my employers have contributed thus far, and I gave it over to my mortgage company, my mortgage would be cut in half and the mortgage company would have an instant cash infusion it wouldn’t have to pay back. I would save CONSIDERABLY on interest payments, countering the deterioration of my standard of living that a recession may bring. And if the gov’t lets me continue to give my SS payments to the mortgage, then I’d be out from under it in 4 years, leaving me 20 more years to aggressively save for retirement. All without touching my 200.5K.
Likely, the nose wipers wouldn’t trust me to put my mortgage away as savings once the house is paid off. If I had to sign a document agreeing to put my mortgage payments, once the home is paid off, into savings until it reached X dollars in order to have all the above, I’d do it in a heart beat.
Financial Times
Existing home prices hit 40-year low
By Daniel Pimlott in New York
Published: November 24 2008 16:27 | Last updated: November 24 2008 16:27
The price of previously owned homes fell in October by the most in at least 40 years and the volume of sales also fell, in a sign of the still mounting problems in the housing market.
The median price of existing homes fell by 11.3 per cent in October to $183,300 compared with a year before, the National Association of Realtors reported, the largest annual drop since records began in 1968.
Am I correct in surmising the reporter botched the byline? Certainly the nominal price level is not back to 1968 levels, when my dad’s house in the midwest was worth maybe $15,000 (unless we are talking about Detroit)? I am guessing the price drop was largest in forty years, rather than the price level…
If reading it causes some people to freak out and re-price their homes to 1968 levels thinking those are the new comps, all the better I say!
If people repriced to 1968 levels, a bidding war would ensue which would drive the price level up to the 2008 auction price level. We underpriced twice in the past twelve years, and sold in a few days for above our list price both times. Underpricing does not typically make your home sell for below the (auction) market price, but it does make your home sell far more quickly than does listing it at a wishing price which no qualified buyers are willing to pay.
So true! We’ve sold five properties in 2004-2007, four of those during the “credit crisis” — a couple of those in really hard-hit areas. Priced each well, and all were sold fairly quickly with multiple offers.
There is no shortage of buyers or credit. The only problem is sellers who refuse to sell at market price.
test
My economic bailout plan-
As long as the government is gung-ho on the fathomless debt thing, why not give money to those who it belongs in lieu of lending it to entities that may not be able to pay it back, likely putting us even more in debt?
If the government gave me back every penny of my Social Security that I and my employers have contributed thus far, and I gave it over to my mortgage company, my mortgage would be cut in half and the mortgage company would have an instant cash infusion it wouldn’t have to pay back. I would save CONSIDERABLY on interest payments, equalling an increase in income. And if the gov’t lets me continue to give my SS payments to the mortgage, then I’d be out from under it in 4 years, leaving me 20 more years to aggressively save for retirement. All without touching my 200.5K.
Maybe the nose wipers wouldn’t trust me to put my mortgage away as savings once the house is paid off. If I had to sign a document agreeing to put the equivalent of my mortgage payments into savings until it reached X dollars in order to have all the above, I’d do it in a heart beat.
GDP and Consumer confidence could maybe influence markets tomorrow.
“…The result would be a sudden rise in inflation, perhaps the mother of all bond market crashes and, quite possibly, a dollar crisis….
The US policy establishment regards this crisis principally as carrying a “one-tailed”, or one-sided, risk of a deflationary depression, to be avoided at all costs. But there are also grave risks associated with making a type-two error. A subsequent rise in US inflation could trigger a mass flight out of dollar assets and a large rise in US market interest rates, followed by a huge recession. The main difference is that the policy options would be a lot more constrained under such a scenario. In fact, a type-two error could also give rise to a depression – only later. I still think it is best to treat the crisis as an event with a “two-tailed” risk.”
from:
Double jeopardy for financial policymakers
By Wolfgang Münchau
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/835d3992-b979-11dd-99dc-0000779fd18c.html
Since there has never been a deflationary environment with falling interest rates and easy moneys, I believe the currency collapse/inflation is a far greater risk than a deflationary environment.
I don’t think you have a clear understanding of how “fractional-reserve” works.
I suggest you revisit the subject including how `backstops’ work.
‘The US policy establishment regards this crisis principally as carrying a “one-tailed”, or one-sided, risk of a deflationary depression, to be avoided at all costs. But there are also grave risks associated with making a type-two error.’
It is rather challenging to avoid a type-two error when one is walking on a tight rope with a moat full of alligators to one side and a bottomless pit of fire on the other while buffeted by hurricane-force winds.
“Human fish, swimming at the bottom of a great ocean develop psychic injuries as they collide with one another. Most mortal of all, are those gotten from the parent fish.”
and, “I could never figure what the phrase meant ‘More or Less’”
appreciate the comments, hozzie.
Some commentors already have a rather clear perception at this stage of the mass scam of the millenium.
Monday, November 24, 2008
Consumers alone won’t ease recession
Little noticed in the day’s headlines is this little tidbit: Existing home sales fell another 3% last month. The average house today is worth about what it was in early 2004. Commentator Dean Baker says attention must be paid.
Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. (Center for Economic and Policy Research)
Kai Ryssdal: OK, so Citigroup is saved. The president-elect is alluding to a super-sized stimulus package. Un-noticed in today’s headlines, though, is this little tidbit: The housing market still stinks. Existing home sales fell another 3 percent last month. The average house today is worth just about what it was early in 2004. Commentator Dean Baker says attention must be paid.
——————————————————————————-
Dean Baker: When our political leaders come up with proposals for fixing the economy, they better remember how we got into this mess. The core problem is the loss of housing wealth, not access to credit.
Homeowners have lost more than $5 trillion in real housing wealth in the last two years and are likely to lose another $3 trillion. That’s almost $110,000 in equity for every homeowner in the country. That loss of wealth led directly to the plunge in consumption which is pushing us into a deep recession.
The current fixation on consumer credit misses the point.
Yes, people are having trouble getting loans for cars and other big ticket items. They are also finding it more difficult to get credit cards or student loans.
But the primary problem is not the liquidity of the financial system. It’s that the loss of housing equity has made tens of millions of families less creditworthy.
Those worthless dollars appear to becoming more and more — VALUABLE. Quite a conundrum, neh?
P.S. Time to run off to refill my gas tank, before today’s 5 pct increase in oil prices trickles down to the pump…
Monday, November 24, 2008
More retail customers paying with cash
We’ve been a nation of borrowers for a while now. What might be surprising is the news that we’re changing those habits. Retailers are starting to see a preference for cash on the barrelhead.
Kai Ryssdal: According to the Federal Reserve Americans consumers collectively owe about $2.5 trillion. That’s not even counting home loans. It’s what’s called revolving credit, sum total for all of our credit cards, auto loans, you name it.
Unfortunately the number itself isn’t surprising. We’ve been a nation of borrowers for a while now. What might be surprising is the news that we’re changing those habits. Retailers are starting to see a preference for cash on the barrelhead. Marketplace’s Jeremy Hobson reports from New York.
Suggestion to hedge fund managers:
BUY LOW, SELL HIGH!!!
Hedge Funds May Sell $200 Billion More of Assets, Survey Finds
By Saijel Kishan
Nov. 24 (Bloomberg) — Hedge funds are about halfway done selling securities to reduce their use of borrowed money and may unload $200 billion more to complete the process, according to managers surveyed by Sanford C. Bernstein & Co.
The survey found that 63 percent of hedge-fund managers said the sale of assets to cut leverage was at least half completed. Twenty-three percent said the process was three- quarters finished, New York-based Bernstein said.
Hedge funds, which borrow money in an effort to increase trading profits, have been forced to unload assets to meet client withdrawals and tighter lending requirements. That has amplified losses in the stock and bond markets. The Standard & Poor’s Index 500 Index fell 38 percent this year through October, while hedge funds lost an average of 16 percent, according to data compiled by Hedge Fund Research Inc.
“We estimate that roughly $200 billion will be additionally unwound,” Adam Parker, an analyst at Bernstein wrote in a Nov. 21 report to clients. The survey was based on interviews in the first two weeks of November with managers of more than 65 hedge funds overseeing a combined $100 billion.
What kind of fees do hedge fund investors pay for these stellar returns?
NOVEMBER 20, 2008, 9:16 P.M. ET
Last Month, $40 Billion Pulled From Hedge Funds
By KEVIN KINGSBURY
…
The investments known as “funds of hedge funds,” which invest in several other funds, saw $22 billion in withdrawals. That group’s performance is negative 18.5% this year.
U.S. housing isn’t the only industry in the global economy facing a glut at the present.
Asia’s shippers and the Baltic rout
Mohammed Hadi | November 25, 2008
The Wall Street Journal
THE nicest thing anyone’s willing to say about Asia’s dry-bulk shippers these days is that they offer investors a cheap way to speculate on a rebound in shipping rates.
A falloff in demand for the raw materials these companies haul has led to a crash in shipping rates. The Baltic Dry Index is down 93 per cent since its peak in May. Even where there is still some demand, difficulties arranging trade finance are hitting the business.
All this undercuts ships’ earning potential, pushing down the value of the ships on a company’s books.
In short order, investors have stopped giving shipping companies credit for either earnings or assets. Asia’s biggest dry-bulk shipper by market capitalisation is China Cosco Holdings: it now trades at 2.5 times expected 2009 earnings, and half of expected book value. As recently as August, it was trading at five times earnings and 2.5 times book value.
China Cosco has the backing of a deep pocketed parent, state-owned China Ocean Shipping, which will surely see it through the turmoil.
But further deterioration in both earnings and book value seems inevitable for the industry if only because at the worst possible time a wave of new supply — ships ordered during recent boom years — is coming online.
Virtually everything in the world is being overproduced (ok, maybe not infrastructure) but virtually every doo-dad is far overproduced compared to the number of people who can afford it.
Do I really need to point out how Econ 101 deals with this?
The Econ 101 lesson of excess supply presaging price declines has been pointed out many times many ways by many posters here, including Ben Jones himself.
BTW, I am wondering if the oil sheiks might even be producing too much black gold these days. I just paid $1.989 at the pump in San Diego. Who-hoooo!!!! Cheap petrol for everyone!!! Time to buy an SUV?