Bits Bucket For January 3, 2009
Please visit the HBB Forum. Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.
Examining the home price boom and its effect on owners, lenders, regulators, realtors and the economy as a whole.
Please visit the HBB Forum. Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.
Taint enough… What about all the other beggars in line?
U.S. governors seek $1 trillion federal assistance…
PHILADELPHIA (Reuters) - Governors of five U.S. states urged the federal government to provide $1 trillion in aid to the country’s 50 states to help pay for education, welfare and infrastructure as states struggle with steep budget deficits amid a deepening recession.
The governors of New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Ohio and Wisconsin — all Democrats — said the initiative for the two-year aid package was backed by other governors and follows a meeting in December where governors called on President-elect Barack Obama to help them maintain services in the face of slumping revenues.
Gov. David Paterson of New York said 43 states now have budget deficits totaling some $100 billion as tax revenues plunge.
“It’s clear that the federal government needs to step in and jump-start the economy,” said Gov. Deval Patrick of Massachusetts.
The latest package calls for $350 billion to create jobs by building or repairing roads, bridges and other public works; $250 billion to maintain education; and another $250 billion in “counter-cyclical” spending such as extending unemployment benefits and food stamps, which are typically a responsibility of the states.
The remainder would be used to fund middle-class tax cuts, stimulate the embattled housing market, and stem the tide of home foreclosures through a loan-modification program.
Gov. Jon Corzine of New Jersey said he hoped some of the $700 billion authorized by Congress in the Troubled Asset Relief Program would be available to help the housing market.
The governors said during a conference call with reporters that the plan had been discussed with Congressional leaders and the incoming administration, which had indicated its willingness to help.
“The Obama team has been very receptive in listening to us,” said Gov. Jim Doyle of Wisconsin. He said “quite a number” of other governors back the initiative.
The Republican Governors Association, however, said the level of federal aid being sought would create a burden for the future.
“The proposal by the Democratic governors goes beyond things like ’shovel-ready’ infrastructure projects and is essentially a bailout of these states’ general funds,” Nick Ayers, executive director of the Republican Governors Association, said in a statement. “Now is the time to focus on finding cost-effective ways to provide essential services without burdening future generations with ever greater debt.”
Doyle of Wisconsin said the plan would allow states to maintain essential services at about the current level until 2010, when the national economy is expected to begin a recovery.
The proposal comes amid expectations that the Obama administration, which takes office on January 20, will provide hundreds of billions of dollars in economic stimulus to boost the shrinking U.S. economy and halt the loss of jobs.
Paterson of New York said his state’s budget deficit has surged to $15.4 billion currently from $5 billion in April 2008, despite a 3.2 percent cut in the education budget.
Corzine said the money called for represents about 3 percent to 3.5 percent of the economy, equivalent to the amount that the economy is expected to contract by over the next two quarters.
The state/local gov’t issue is about to explode onto the scene in 2009 big time. Given the predicaments facing some of these locales, would lower house prices and lower interest rates even be enough to counter balance local tax increases?
Back in 2001, at the time of the decider’s big tax cut, I do indeed remember seeing numerous interviews of houseowners who derisively laughed off their $300 rebate - becuase their local taxing bodies took it all back in spades.
“The state/local gov’t issue is about to explode onto the scene in 2009 big time.”
Amen. I was watching one of the local Friday evening punditry shows on PBS and they’re all whining about the upcoming special session to deal with Florida’s budget deficit. Oh, yah, hauling out the state income tax issue. We don’t have one, but all the commies like to beat the drum for it. Of course, Florida’s sales tax is not equitable. If sales taxes had to be paid on everything (but food and rent) without exception, the budget deficit would disappear in a hurry. We don’t have anywhere near the deficit that Cali does.
Intangible property tax would eliminate this problem. Thanks, Jeb.
Florida attitude: Yeah, let’s cut Head Start and expand the jails instead. Oh, and instead of offering GED programs, just put ‘em on work release. What could go wrong?
The “Intangible Tax” discouraged wealthy retirees from moving to Florida. I’m not so sure it was a good idea. What they need is an income tax!
“The state/local gov’t issue is about to explode onto the scene in 2009 big time”.
You got that right, the tug of war is going to be imminence. Unemployment going up, home values going down, state revenues going down, fee’s, surcharges going up etc… State government is generally resistant to budget cuts, but have no choice at this point. States can’t print money like the FED, so there are bound to be some wild tax plans popping up among them.
my county a dept of wymins affairs
Palmetto has already applied for help !
i now challenge you
tax-me-up-the-booty
to haiku warfare
debt like an anchor
wrapped in dreams of equity
when will you let go?
McStucco price down.
Oh woe! Gone are the slush funds
For the wymmin folk.
One from earlier in the year….after Jesse Jackson’s crack about Obama.
Jackson’s switch-blade cuts
scrotal sack of Barry O
nuts fall to the ground
Bailouts run amok
Next year comes a trillion more
Hurry, stake your claim
“”Gov. David Paterson of New York said 43 states now have budget deficits totaling some $100 billion as tax revenues plunge.”"
Our budgeting and spending habits have been stellar and beyond reproach OTOH.
The first deficit numbers I remember hearing about coming out of CA was about 12 billion, next I knew it was about 30 billion and the latest numbers are approaching 41 billion. Even in my own state of VA. It has gone initially from hundreds of millions to 2 billion to the latest tally which is around 3 billion.
Is there a point of madness We The People attempt in some form or fashion to regain a semblance of control over our own destiny or have become so disjointed, so complacent, as to go with the flow and allow all the “pig-men” to pillage and plunder no matter what?
“Is there a point of madness We The People attempt in some form or fashion to regain a semblance of control over our own destiny or have become so disjointed, so complacent, as to go with the flow and allow all the “pig-men” to pillage and plunder no matter what”?
There is a tipping point, I am just not sure what the trigger will be? High unemployment 10%-20% or much higher? Our state (S.C.) is forecasting around 15% for 2009 and we are a poor state so raising taxes is not a viable option, the population can not pay, don’t have the money. Riots are springing up around the world and could happen here if enough people are ground down and feel there backs are against the wall with no where to turn. We will see, that’s for sure.
I think we’re closer than we think to widespread rioting. There’s already starting to be street crime (purse snatching) in Cupertino, California. This would have been unheard of a few years ago.
If we have to cut services to the poor, riots will be a near-immediate result.
already starting to be street crime (purse snatching) in Cupertino, California ??
Don’t do it in Santa Clara or Campbell for that matter…They compete against each other for the arrest capital of the Valley…You can’t pass gas in either city without getting arrested…
riots? ha. they’ll start squatting. maybe the slumlords will stage their own riot.
a few of massa’s houses will burn down when light bills aren’t paid, or get paid late and the juice gets turned on when the occupant isn’t home
oh, and more poor people’s children will be shooting each other. some rich people’s children will buy drugs from poor people’s children and kill themselves after running up huge bills. the cycle of life.
Tipping point will be the time when most American voters get used to living below their means. At that point they will force Congress to become like them once again and throw out all incumbents used to spending OPM.
Bill - If we could get there - to throw out all incumbents, my life’s political dream would have come true. The problem is, how to educate voters that they can’t re-elect “their” guy because that is what everyone else is doing and why nothing changes.
Does anyone know what Paterson’s bug is with Caroline Kennedy? Not that I have any opinion either way as to whether she should be a Senator, but she and some of her family members have worked for years breaking down social barriers to jobs and offices.
I don’t know. But I’m irritated with her “pick me because I’m a Kennedy” attitude.
The only Kennedy I would want in office besides Ted (I know, I know, but he votes right on all my issues) is Joe. Mass. voters rejected him for getting divorced and then remarrying. Whether in the auld country or the new, James Joyce was correct: Ireland is the sow that eats her young.
Nobody works for his constituents like Uncle Ted. Nobody.
I like Robert Jr., myself. I about messed myself when Matt Lauer was interviewing him and asked how his dad was doing. The look on Jr’s face was priceless.
Hi. Is n’t Robert Jr. the one who was drunk driving in his jeep and crippled a young woman ? Yep a real stand-up guy that Robert.
My personal favorite is Judge Anthony Kennedy !
Which Kennedy is the one shilling for Chavez?
All the good Kennedys are dead, what’s left is the incoherent, rapist, Chevy-diving dross.
One of the Kennedys are. So is the right leaning organizations Christian Coalition of America and the Family Research Council.
Chavez says BOO!
The party heads have their own favorites. It’s a power struggle and Kennedy’s only real tie, in NYS, is Bloomberg. They feel she hasn’t paid her dues, to the party. Once, any party has a monopoly on elected positions, the corruption explodes.
Oh, one more thing, Hillary is bursting a blood vessel over Kennedy’s interest. I can only guess at the reasons. I suppose Hil wants to fall back into that seat in the future and only wants someone to keep it warm.
Hillary’s fit to be tied in general. Between Bammy taking what she rightfully felt to be hers and Caroline encroaching on her territory and Bill messing things up for her, she must be close to going postal. For those reasons alone, I’ve got severe shakes about her being Secretary of State. Because she’s gonna get even somehow. To quote Biden “You mark my words”.
“she rightfully felt to be hers”
I meant “she felt to be rightfully hers”. Makes a difference where the word is placed.
Jeez can’t you folks read the tea leaves? Joe will only be VP for the first Obama term, Hillary will be VP in the next term and then run for President again in 2016.
WAman, I betcha a dollar you are wrong. Barring assassination, Biden will be VP as long as Obama is Pres.
Its a long shot but I think its possible…IF, Obama wins a 2nd term I could see a switch-a-rue where Biden would step down…Biden cannot win a National election…He is a “Gaff Machine”…I like him though…
I don’t know Joe is like 66 and has basically been in govermint his whole life. I would think that he would need a break to sit back and watch his grandchildren grow up.
Also there is that meeting that took place at Boxer’s house in Washington back in June between Hillary and Obama. They talked by themselves for like 1.5 - 2.0 hours. I think that a whole series of jobs were talked about for Hillary and did she not campaign like crazy for him after that?
“Barring assassination, Biden will be VP as long as Obama is Pres.”
Joe Biden is Obama’s assassination prevention insurance, just like Dan Quayle was for Bush 41.
The main issue is that the Senate seat is an appointment. Even in political families (e.g. the Clintons and Bushes, and upcoming Beau Biden), the candidate has to win an election. Caroline would be appointed to the seat on her name alone.
There’s also an experience issue, but Sarah has proven that tangible “experience” isn’t quite what it’s cracked up to be.
He wants her help for his run for Governor,
Her name will pull a lot of money for his election bid.
yeah, and did you get the news on her lack of going to the polls and voting! that is one thing i can’t stand is someone so privledged yet has no time to vote and now wants to be appointed to the senate. what a joke…atleast appoint someone who has voted in a election. I could not believe what i was hearing!
I love it when people criticize Caroline Kennedy. Either they hate the Kennedy family in general, which is pretty humorous. After all, the Kennedy family has actually served this nation honorably in a time of war, lost sons, and had a President assassinated. But to some, that really doesn’t matter. To these experts, my standard question to anything political today is…”so, who did you vote for in 2000 and 2004? Because if you voted for Bush, you have proven without a shadow of a doubt that you have absolutely no clue what is or isn’t good for this country.”
So to those slamming Caroline…who did you vote for in 2000 and 2004? Because if you voted Chimp all I have to say is it is better to stay silent and have people wonder if you are an idiot, than open your mouth and prove you are.
I would also add that Caroline would be 100 times better than Palin in office. At least Caroline is intelligent, which is far more than I can say for that white trash.
+1
-1™
“better to stay silent and have people wonder if you are an idiot, than open your mouth and prove you are.”
That is the pot calling the kettle black.
“Because if you voted for Bush, you have proven without a shadow of a doubt that you have absolutely no clue what is or isn’t good for this country.”
One man does not a country make.
“I would also add that Caroline would be 100 times better than Palin in office. At least Caroline is intelligent, which is far more than I can say for that white trash.”
What does Palin have to do with the New York Senate seat? Do you call everyone you disagree with Trash?
the problem is too much government spending at all levels and no planning by the states. maybe we could empty all the prisons of low level crimes and drug users. I bet we could get rid of 500000 prisoners and cut that expense. there won’t be enough money to cover all the lack or revenue. on infrastructure, how about some serious high speed rail services and jack up the gasoline taxes to pay for it all. all this energy and money to go into road widening is a total waste of the money. how about building natural gas filling station infrastructure and get all the trucks and fleet vehicles on american natural gas and cut our oil imports. upgrade the power transmission system and build wind generation in the midwest. do the pickens plan. build solar plants! anything that is forward looking to a future without oil!
Release of low-level offenders is, for the most part, within the reach NOW of state governors by their power to pardon & commute sentences.
How about eliminating entitlements for illegal immigrants? If the “pro-immigrant” crowd (usually businesses that are being subsidized by the very same taxpayers whose wages are being decimated by illegal labor) want illegal immigration, let them pay for ALL the services they use, including schools, “welfare” like subsidized housing, food, healthcare, and they need to cover all the additional costs for law enforcement, legal defense costs, prisons, code enforcement, and all the additional infrastructure costs associated with the additional burden of all these people (water, roads, etc.).
Considering that we’ve raised a couple generations of Americans who absolutely have no sense of resourcefulness and will call a plumber to pull hair out of a drain, or call their HOA if there’s a big hairy spider on their front porch, it seems that it will be difficult to pull back from the big government that such cultural helplessness demands. Taxpayer handouts are pervasive at all levels, from mortgage interest tax writeoffs to paying foreign companies subsidizes to build a factory in your county. Watched a TV ad the other day about funeral expense insurance where the announcer was whining about how the government only paid $300 bucks to cover burial costs. Imagine that, what a big bad uncaring government. This $300 bucks is the legacy of the Depression, a widow and orphan benefit. And pay higher taxes to fund a couple overseas wars? Gosh, higher consumption and Iraqi oil revenue, and an expanding economy based on real estate will cover those expenses. Not. The American public has been fed a free lunch philosophy for decades and it’s going to get ugly. Obesity, McMansions and bloated SUVs are symbolic manifestations of a gluttony nation.
I don’t get this. Presumably all this slushy tax money came from the inflated home values. But home values have been overflated for only the past 6-7 years or so. Presumably also, the economy in those states has been rather booming, either from the general boom in 90’s or housing boom in early 00’s, so people did not need as many services.
So, how did these states get along in the early 90’s before all this booming? What did these states spend all the housing boom tax revenue on in the past 5 years? Certainly not pot-holes. And sorry, flat-me-tax-me, your womyn’s affairs dept can’t cost billions and billions.
It reminds me of the 50-year furniture stores going out of business after one bad year. Have these people never heard of a check-book? Maybe the pension funds got hit in the market?
Well, you would have to come down to Florida and look at the explosion of the universities, with millions of state money given directly for fancy shmancy new buildings. Every once in a while they have a little moment and worry about energy use and “sustainability” but then they realize that they’re having a little gas from eating all that smoked pork.
Other hogs include expensive road projects; buying “conservation” land at excessively high valuations (thus paying off well-connected land owners AND dodging any zoning with teeth or requiring impact fees or, hell, requiring that proper sewers and roads be built in the first place, by developers–in this farm, developers are always more equal than others); tax breaks for boat owners, stock brokers, developers, sugar farmers; and all kinds of idiotic “image” spending, like tens of thousands for consultants in Tennessee to come up with the inane slogan “every path begins with passion” (for Gainesville) or going on “investment” junkets to foreign capitals (Crist) or spending who knows how much on “public relations” which means tv ads and slick brochures and upgrading your office buildings because all the “world class” (?) cities are doing it.
Money went down soooo many rat holes in Florida, while the poor still live under third world conditions. Hmm, just like a 3rd world country, actually. You know, in the first world (New England), they actually teach prisoners real world skills so they won’t keep coming back for three hots and a cot? Astounding. Oh, and you know they did studies and found it actually works, too? Yes, you can actually do “research” based on “evidence” to make decisions, instead of picking up a KJV, waving it around, and chanting “woo woo.” Astonishing, isn’t it?
“three hots and a cot”
+1
They teach prisoners real world skills and they don’t come back? and how do you know this astounding bit of fact? maybe, you read it somewhere? what kind of (realworld?) skills? I suppose , if this were true, then the crime problem must be solved in progressive New England?
not all of them, but a higher percentage (like double digits) than if you do nothing
google “recidivism”
A great point you made.
All these state governments would not be in trouble if they raised their budgets in step with inflation, instead of pre-spending all the expected tax money from yet-to-be-completed condo projects. Florida even built schools, that it turns out they didn’t need, based on all those condos they were building. It didn’t occur to them that everyone in FL owned 2 or 3 condos and there weren’t really families with children to occupy them.
“…instead of pre-spending all the expected tax money from yet-to-be-completed condo projects.”
Oh, I can think of at least one large Midwestern city that is guilty of this. During the boom they couldn’t rezone or make zoning exceptions fast enough to cram every neighborhood with condos.
Everytime a development was questioned, the # 1 rationale cited by the local PTB was projected tax revenues.
During the boom they couldn’t rezone or make zoning exceptions fast enough to cram every neighborhood with condos.
The Flagrant Rezoning Index depends on the ward, but yes, the zoning machinations were enough to make one’s head spin.
If there’s justice in this here Midwest, the most pro-development aldermen will lose their seats (and possibly go to the pokey).
Elk Grove, CA is another city that counted their chickens before they hatched. Built a school based on the number of so called houses being sold. Now they don’t need the school.
The small city of Kuna ID (SW of Boise) got stars in their eyes when all the developers rolled out their development maps. They thought there would be 10s of thousands of new homes springing up nearby, so they built a world-class giant sewage treatment plant built SOLELY on the projections of near term growth.
You got it. Millions of dollars spent on way over-capacity.
Certain homeowners found themselves on the hook for the entire amount. Some homeowners have received a $8-10K annual billing for sewer service.
Very well stated Gator. Locking up and throwing away the key sounds good to a very small but loud wackjob minority but never ever works in reality.
I don’t think it’s a minority who think this. I think it’s most people. They assume (perhaps reasonably) that they’ll never be on the wrong side of the criminal justice system.
You know who doesn’t run around screaming for “revenge!” every time a crime is committed? Black men.
But for white people, I do have a cautionary tale: Gerald Amirault.
“You know who doesn’t run around screaming for “revenge!” every time a crime is committed? Black men.”
Huh?
Read about the Crown Heights Riot.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_Heights_Riot
BTW: I had a google news alert set to see if I can find *ANY* African American leader who condemned the manslaughter of African Immigrant Jdimytai Damour, trampled to death by a nearly exclusively African American crowd, just a few miles from Crown Heights. I couldn’t find any. Not a word from Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson who were present in Crown Heights (after an angry mob killed a completely innocent person) at rallies where African Americans were holding signs saying that Hitler should have finished his job.
Reuven,
I laughed at that “black men” comment too and tried to respond, but it didn’t come through. Someone has been asleep the last 20 or more years.
You’re right. Alot of someones.
teach prisoners real world skills ??
That would be a good idea if they could actually land a job after the training….The system is structured to discriminate against anyone with a criminal record….Get busted for Felony pot possession and you MUST answer YES on the job application that ASKS; Have you Ever ?? A felony or conviction has likely eliminated 1/2 the job applications that would normally be available…Maybe more…
This is the best use of money ..i have been advocating this for years…..Teach prisoners to read write and speak English and to at least finish high school, could be our best investment in the future.
——————————————————————–
they actually teach prisoners real world skills so they won’t keep coming back for three hots and a cot? Astounding. Oh, and you know they did studies and found it actually works, too?
They’ve been teaching high school in prisons and jails for forty years, it’s the law in NYS. College courses and degree programs have been offered for over thirty years. It’s the unions , liberals, now seem to love so much that contribute to recidivism. Prisoners are idle because unions won’t let them take their jobs. Laying around, not working for years, doesn’t make for a good work ethic, when they get out. The individuals that truly want to turn themselves around, are given every opportunity, while incarcerated.
Bush cut spending to the states. Had to use the money for the stupid war in Iraq.
Tipping point very close. 10-year Treasury Bond went from 2.1-something percent to 2.4-something percent yesterday, in just one day.
I have been predicting double-digit inflation arriving before the end of Obama’s first term. I won’t yet say it will occur sooner than that, but the printing press runs will eventually overcome the current financial inertia.
It will be easy to pay off a $3 Trillion debt when a loaf of bread costs more than $50 and the minimum wage results in a 6-figure income.
Oh, and it will solve the housing crisis too. No one will be under water any more.
Lately, I’m really trying to come to some sort of terms with the inflationista argument, really I am. There’s a lot of merit to your argument, except for one little sticking point that I cannot quite stomach:
“…and the minimum wage results in a 6-figure income.”
There will be no meaningful wage inflation in this cycle. The continued globalization of wages is of paramount importance to the PTB. Eventually that concern will trump even their concern to manage the percipitous drop in house prices.
“There will be no meaningful wage inflation in this cycle.”
When I lived in Russia in the early 90s, we had hyperinflation and no wages at all. There were NO JOBS. No incomes. Savings were gone in a poof of smoke. It was brutal.
Who says there have to be jobs and higher wages in order for hyperinflation to happen? Not so. Printing money -> more money chasing fewer real goods -> hyperinflation. Meanwhile, the poor shmuck who lost his job goes hungry, while all around him prices go up, and up, and up…
I lived it. Excalating wages are NOT necessary for hyperinflation.
Yes, it is true – you do not need wage inflation to have hyperinflation. I lived trough one myself too. Russia and the former communist countries in Eastern Europe lived to their own Great Depression in the 90s.
@ NYchk,
thank you for the insight. It is informative!
Yes, but I wasn’t arguing that increasing wages were a prerequisite for hyperinflation. Rather, my rather narrow point is that despite what some people in power may want to think, inflation will not restore equilibrium.
I agree, the suffering will be far worse if hyperinflation kicks in than if things continue on their deflationary trajectory. Rising wages simply cannot be counted on to mitigate that.
There was wage inflation in Russia during the 90’s. It was just that the wage inflation was not equally applied amongst all of the participants in the economy.
Wage inflation was was concentrated in the political/oligarch classes. Trickle down at its best.
Not sure about no wage inflation. City of San Francisco just increased minimum wage. It’s almost $10 per hour.
$10 an hour full time and paid vacations/sick days is $20,800 a year. Hardly a six figure yearly salary
I cannot imagine trying to live in SF on $10 per hour. I suppose it can be done, but quality of life might be a little rough. I just remember visiting an old friend in the city back in the 90’s. He shared a one bedroom apt with a gal, and he slept in the linen closet. Not kidding. And the rent, at the time, was like $1300. Rents are WAY up from then. $10 per hour would go real quick. I know I could do it with no vehicle, and making meals from scratch, etc., but it wouldn’t be fun.
BB: I do not understand how you or anybody else could do it, even without a vehicle.
$10.00/hr x 40 hr/wk x 4.33 wk/mo = $1,733/mo
$1,733 - SS tax - any other taxes = ?
Assuming zero SS tax, and zero other taxes, you would have the full amount, or $1,733/mo.
And assuming the rent of $1,300 of a decade ago (75.0% of income), you would have $433/mo for all other expenses, or exactly $100/wk.
But rents are WAY up. So how would you do it?
Hi, TCM guy. Would definitely have to be renting a room in a cheap place, sharing rent. Not an ideal situation. With $1200 per month take home, there certainly wouldn’t be a lot of wiggle room. But, I can easily feed myself for $100 per month. That leaves $1100 for rent, utilities, public transportation, toiletries, etc. Not a good chunk of change for SF. I don’t know why low income people even live there. I sure wouldn’t want to try it!
“When I lived in Russia in the early 90s, we had hyperinflation and no wages at all. There were NO JOBS. No incomes. Savings were gone in a poof of smoke. It was brutal.”
Yikes.
Houses are supposed to be the big, easy inflation shelter. At what point do you throw in the towel? I don’t have a very good knack for investing, I’m just a good saver, so this is the nightmare scenario for me.
“Houses are supposed to be the big, easy inflation shelter.”
In Russia, apartments proved a great inflation shelter. But unlike US, there were almost no maintenance fees, and zero taxes. (Even now the only real cost of an apartment in Russia is the purchase price, while maintenance & tax are very little, e.g. $50/month).
But in US, I wonder what would happen in a hyperinflation scenario? Maintenance & taxes are already high. If you lose your job and can’t pay the inflation-adjusted maintenance & tax, maybe that house will not be such a good hedge after all, since you still might lose it?
“maybe that house will not be such a good hedge after all, since you still might lose it?”
Oh, yes, absolutely. Between a rock and a hard place.
2.1-something percent to 2.4 ??
Just a small rotation out of T’s and into the market….Small hedge bet…
RE: Governors of five U.S. states urged the federal government to provide $1 trillion in aid to the country’s 50 states to help pay for education, welfare and infrastructure as states struggle with steep budget deficits amid a deepening recession.
Education…aka more money to pay those 5 aides; physical therapist; speech therapist; special vehicle bus driver; dietician monitor; and the legions of special ed bureaucractic paper shufflers for Liam the Downs Syndrome kid who will never amount to more than a grocery store bagger.
Welfare…Gotta pony up more dough for the subsidies to allow all the Section 8 crowd to make a smooth transition from multi-unit apartment to the single-family detached homes bought by FHA/HUD.
Plus Peggy Joseph needs her existing mortgage paid and gas tank filled.
Infrastructure…aka more shoddy construction projects reeking of graft and corruption like the Big Dig here in Mazzland which was 1000% over budget and leaks like a sieve.
Lottsa stimulus here.
I haven’t posted in a long while, but I had to comment on this one.
You nailed it.
Yes he did…
As someone with a speech impediment, I must take issue with cutting speech therapists. If kids don’t get therapy when they’re young, it’s MUCH harder to fix when they are older. Speech therapy is not a never-ending program because most impediments can be cured in about a year. Speech impediments exist in otherwise normal kids, not just special-needs children.
I agree that there are probably more efficient ways to school special-needs children.
Oxide:
what do we do with the millions of minority kids who refuse to speak English? And where ghetto is an accepted language in schools?
That’s not true speech therapy.
Don’t be hatin’ dawg, ‘aight?
“Education”……
Don’t forget all them generous pension packages too.
Bingo, Blano. In CA, prison guards, police and firemen get retirement pay 100% of salary at 30 years. They negotiated these contracts during the tech bubble and refuse to give them up. All of the politicians regard them as sacred cows. And University of California nurses are about to go on strike after being offered a 7% raise. Yeesh. People won’t get it until the state goes into default, and then we can start over from scratch.
That’s amazing, REh.
If the benefits are so great, and the work so easy, why aren’t you doing it?
If I believed as you do, I’d consider myself a fool for doing anything else.
This might as well read: “States seek $1 Trillion in new taxes to make up for $1 Trillion tax shortfall”. This is insanity. Can we stop pretending that money ‘comes from the government’ now? The money comes from us.
Pretend? The PTB don’t have to pretend. They’ve shown us it does come from the government and all you need are the right connections and a no-bod contract is yours!
Where do you think people got the idea? Now quit your whining and find yourself a politician worth buying!!
“… But housing will probably bottom out by spring, many forecasters now argue. The Federal Reserve will play a role in making this happen by buying mortgage-backed securities and, in doing so, lowering the rate on 30-year mortgages to less than 5 percent, which is roughly the present level. That will encourage not only home buying, but also refinancing.
“In the midst of recession, with very sour moods, housing activity begins to improve because we get a big decline in mortgage rates,” said Robert Barbera, chief economist for ITT Investment Technology Group.
Then, too, the basic demographic demand for new homes, the forecasters say, is 1.7 million units a year. That many are not being built today, but with inventories shrinking and prices stabilizing, home construction will revive, many forecasters argue, contributing once again to economic growth.
“It is not fun to be a portent of doom,” Mr. Barbera said. “And even now in these doomlike times, we in the forecasting profession say it won’t last.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/03/business/economy/03econ.html?_r=1&hp
“But housing will probably bottom out by spring, many forecasters now argue”.
The broken record continues as always. Even though the population is well trained to spend and believe for the most part RE is their best investment, where is this nation of non-savers going to come up with the down payments? To many in the tout media think once a ‘bottom’ does occur it’s going back to the ‘good old days’ in RE.
There has been a financial melt down like no other, the PTB will throw everything including the kitchen sink at it, to no avail. We have a long, long way to go, and every bounce in the market will be hailed as the beginning of the next big rally. I think the end of 2009 will make 2008 look like pleasant prosperous times. There is no quick fix, but you can’t tell the main stream that, they don’t want to hear it and they can’t handle it anyway.
“where is this nation of non-savers going to come up with the down payments?”
“the PTB will throw everything including the kitchen sink at it, to no avail.”
Someone will probably come up with a new, zero down guvmint program to try and keep the party going. Anything seems possible at this point.
“Someone will probably come up with a new, zero down guvmint program to try and keep the party going. Anything seems possible at this point”.
There is absolutely no doubt about it IMO. I think we will see some of the most incredibly insane hair brain schemes that anyone can imagine. When the lunatics run the asylum anything can happen, so a nationalized housing finance program of gargantuan proportion is not at all out of the question. Thing is, it won’t work, but the PTB aren’t able to comprehend such things.
I’m going to get a little pedantic here and point out that the phrase is “hare brained” = brain as small as a bunny, not “hair brained” = you skulcase is filled with hair.
I think hairbrain is valid too as it implies there is only more hair where there should be brains
C’mon.. We’re splitting hares here, aren’t we?
(Ahem) Sorry….
I agree Blano, but I’m hopeful that the government pendulum doesn’t swing ALL the way to the left. Surely somebody in Congress realizes that downpayments are the strongest defence against a housing bubble.
[in fact, I would argue that down payment alone is enough to stop a housing bubble. All the nterest rate manipulations, CDO's, NINJAs, and Super-ShIVs on Wall Street won't help, because they only affect the howmuchamonth payment. If a buyer has to pony up cold hard cash-money in paper Bennies, prices go nowhere.]
“down payment alone is enough to stop a housing bubble”
Yes, yes, and yes. And avoid a bust too. I am always saying that the reason why none of my few dozen borrowers is in default is, every one made a big down payment. I make no-doc loans and yet I have no trouble. Two words bear repeating. Down Payment.
I agree Blano, but I’m hopeful that the government pendulum doesn’t swing ALL the way to the left. Surely somebody in Congress realizes that downpayments are the strongest defence against a housing bubble.
I must’ve missed the part about downpayments being a partisan political issue in my Little Red Book Of Political Dogma.
Remind me again — who wrote those 100% no-doc loans?
I’m saying that there’s a possibility that a Democratic would over-reach on the socialist side and offer do-wn payment assistance. I’m saying I hope it doesn’t happen.
100% no-doc loans were written by highly motivated brokers who knew that the loans would be repackaged and bought by Lehmans Brothers et al, who in turn knew that they were insured by AIG. Everyone collected fees.
From the FHA site:
NUTS AND BOLTS
The most popular FHA home loan is the 203(b). This fixed-rate loan often works well for first time home buyers because it allows individuals to finance up to 97 percent of their home loan which helps to keep down payments and closing costs at a minimum. The 203(b) home loan is also the only loan in which 100 percent of the closing costs can be a gift from a relative, non-profit, or government agency.
http://www.fha.com/fixed_rate.cfm
For fun, check out their other “products” available right now (I really like the “Graduated Payment” and “Growing Equity” mortgages):
http://www.fha.com/fha_loan_types.cfm
“For fun, check out their other “products” available right now (I really like the “Graduated Payment” and “Growing Equity” mortgages)”
It’s like a crack addict who keeps going back to the old neighborhood convinced this time it will be different. Whatever happened to “You get what you pay for?”
Stupid $*%(#&* #*@()*$#!!!!
I am sure Barack Obama’s folks (his transition team was loaded with Chicago R-E wheeler-dealers) will have some more money printed to put poor people into homes they can’t afford….to start the cycle all over again. Or at least try to.
new, zero down guvmint program ??
You are basically there already…3% down FHA.
“where is this nation of non-savers going to come up with the down payments?”
Well, by law we are in fact a nation of savers. We’re forced to put 15.3% of our income away each paycheck. We can’t afford to, but we do. That’s where down payments could be coming from.
Someone will probably come up with a new, zero down guvmint program to try and keep the party going. Anything seems possible at this point.
————————
Already done (linked through Fannie Mae site).
Up to 100% Financing-With No Mortgage Insurance!*
Make sure you get the best possible home financing for your property! This program offers fixed rate mortgages with up to 100% financing and no mortgage insurance. No appraisal necessary on select properties.
Qualifications include:
One-unit, owner-occupied primary residences only
First mortgages only-does not apply to second mortgages
Full documentation required
http://www.expresspath.com/info/landscape?cid=18649&jpid=100Finance
You can’t handle the truth!
“What is truth?” - Pontius Pilate
“And Ye Shall Know the Truth, and the Truth Shall Make You Free,”
http://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol52no2/iac/the-day-the-wall-came-down.html
Fail.
“Error Code: 301 - Moved Permanently”
Don’t forget about pent up demand.
It’s like a savings account. You save all this demand, then when times get tough, you have it there to fall back on.
I think Robert Toll won the Nobel for his work in that area of economics.
No THAT is funny.
I’m just going to add in my old rant that desire is not the same as economic demand, at least it isn’t when anything vaguely resembling lending standards is in place. Lots and lots of people may want houses. But if they can’t get a loan or pay cash, there is no pent up demand, just desire.
“Pent up Desire”, the new bestseller by Polly…what a fantastic name for a book on economic theory. Especially if it has lots of heaving bosoms with pocket protectors on the cover.
Don’t forget to add those muscular rippling chests
No = Now.
Thanks, ella. Hmm…heaving bosoms and pocket protectors? I actually own a pocket protector (from my brief time with DEC’s Ultrix operating system), but I’ve never worn it. They don’t…mold very well to the curves, as it were. You could photoshop it to make the cover look good.
But, you are right. Quite the title for an economics book. Who said it had to be the dismal science? I’d need a ghost writer though. Not an economics expert.
That NY Times aricle was quite a doozy. When I read it, I didn’t even really see the real estate stuff as the main point. It was pretty much a highlights interview with all the economists who have been wrong until now saying that good times are right around the corner. Then they said that Roubini (who has been much more right so far) disagrees. Yawn. Just a classic “some people who are in my Outlook contacts list said this and someone else disagrees” article. The only difference is they noted that the first group was wrong for a while. The editors should be ashamed to let this drivel through.
I really like your posts, polly, so I will buy your book…please hurry up and write it.* No pressure
* (especially if there are some rippling chests on the cover, a suggestion which should be passed on to the designer).
“Don’t forget to add those muscular rippling chests”….
I guess we HAVE met.
“Pent up Desire”
XXX-rated economics book titles:
- Carnal Demand
- Salacious Supply
- Hedonic Harlots
- Extramarital Equilibrium
Interest rates under 5%?
A condo development down the block has been offering a developer’s deal of ~4% for well over a year now - and to no avail.
Heck, now they’ll even throw in a Smart Car, but most of the units remain dark.
a lemon condo to go with your lemon car! sign me up, pronto!
“housing will probably bottom out by spring”
What about the second wave, when the Alt-As and option
ARMs reset in 2010/2011? Some predict defaults of up to 70%.
Yep, according to the Credit Suisse chart, we can now say, “Subprime is contained.” Nearly all of the subprimes have reset. But the chart shows pick-a-pay loans as the next tsunami, in 2010-11,
The thing with that chart, Bill, is that many of those folks will have already defaulted or refinanced by the time that comes around. Someone mentioned that possibility here, and it makes sense to me.
Yeah, bottom in spring and stay flat for awhile and then drop off the cliff when the Alt-As and Option ARMs reset. If you think houses are bargains in some places now, they will be cheaper than dirt in 2013.
The August 2007 almost-meltdown was precipitated by just a whiff of trouble in Alt-A. Imagine what it will look like when the Sacred Primes begin defaulting.
The funniest thing about the article is that it spends the first half telling us how wrong all the forecasters and their models have been. And then says this about housing without credulity.
Mr. Barbera left out the news that we are still building 600,000 new homes a year and only selling 500,00. That seems to be just one small problem with his thinking.
““It is not fun to be a portent of doom,” Mr. Barbera said.”
That’s not what I heard from FPSS.
=^_^=
Never seen that one before Ella…:)
De gustibus non est disputandum.
Too true.
“…lowering the rate on 30-year mortgages to less than 5 percent, which is roughly the present level. That will encourage not only home buying, but also refinancing.”
Sure. I bet there are just loads of banks waiting to refinance a loan balance which dwarfs the value of the underlying asset. Pffft.
Sure. I bet there are just loads of banks waiting to refinance a loan balance which dwarfs the value of the underlying asset. Pffft.
———————-
Who needs banks or private investors when the Fed and Treasury have the ability to just “print up” trillions of dollars?
I expect the we will see the MBS purchases funded via Treasury. Buy Treasuries and the money will be used to buy assets of questionable value in the private market.
Nice…
But I thought all housing was regional? How is it that the “bottom” is suddenly national? Take a look at Harlem in northern Manhattan. It crashed in the 1930’s and stayed down for most of the 20th century. Brooklyn, too.
Paul Kennedy Says New World Order Will Emerge:
The biggest question concerns the U.S. My instinct tells me it will lose ground in 2009. I simply don’t see how the Treasury can print $1 trillion to cover deficit spending, offer those bills at very low interest rates, and expect foreigners (not Americans, because we don’t have the savings) to buy them, persuading the world to keep afloat its greatest debtor since Phillip II of Spain. Why should sensible Chinese investors do that when they can buy Swiss bonds, gold, or Scottish real- estate? Yet if Asians decline to buy tens of billions of Treasuries each month in 2009, U.S. interest rates will have to go up again.
So: India up, China up, Germany up (all relatively). The developing world down, Russia down, most of Europe and Japan down, and President Barack Obama’s America down and down. I’d like to believe I am very wrong. I worry that I’m not.
(Paul Kennedy is Professor of History and Director of International Security Studies at Yale University. He is the author/editor of 19 books, including The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. The views expressed are his own.)
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&sid=aV9_ZOMJf14s
And just think how many millions of Americans even me have an adjustable rate credit card…no choice…$hittibank is 8.1% this month
—————————-
U.S. interest rates will have to go up again.
8.1% are you kidding! You must have lousy credit - but then again someone has to pay for my 0.0% rate!
U.S. interest rates will have to go up again ??
Just remember that “Darth Volker” sits as chair on Obama’s economic advisory council…IMO, once the employment picture stabilizes, Watch out…It could come real fast…Just like 1981…And if it does…Combo is correct…
–
‘The biggest question concerns the U.S. My instinct tells me it will lose ground in 2009.”
The US HAS BEEN losing ground for a very long time; the question is: Will the decline accelerate?
“So: India up, China up, Germany up (all relatively). ”
Forget India; it is a bad, as well as poor, copy of America. China and Germany would do relatively better, but because they are export-dependent they will go thru depression with the world.
Jas
The anti-globalization drums are starting to beat. I watched McLaughlin last night and instead of blaming housing, the concensus was that globalization has been a very bad, failed experiment on a number of levels and that protectionism will be all the rage among nations in 2009.
–
Welcome to early 1930s!
My assessment is that we just entered 1931. Don’t forget that 1932 and 1933 were the worst of the Great Depression. I think that 2010-12 would be the worst of the Greater Depression.
Jas
The only difference that I see is back then we were more of an isolationist country and where a creditor nation. I think your term greater depression is apt, because we are in much worse shape than our countrymen back then. Plus they tended to have more back bone and adjusted to conditions better the comfortable climate controlled crowd will want to handle.
Hm, wmbz, I read a lot about the 1920’s recently and I think it wasn’t so much having backbone as finding backbone.
Except for farmers: they were already hurting in the 1920’s.
City people partied like it was 1999, then turned into shiftless bums when the music stopped. Whining (”beer and bonus”) was just as advanced then as now. And the rich were just as callous and greedy. They didn’t help themselves to the public till so much probably because there was less of it.
I guess it just depends on points of view and who you talk to, as many people I know a number of people who are still living that grew up back then (born in the teens and twenties). There have always been bums and shiftless, however take a look around you today, I don’t think our culture is as able to stand/deal with a shock to the financial system and adjust to it as well those in the past. Just my opinion, far more people with their hands out as opposed to their sleeves rolled up.
No comparison gator, not even close.
Most people worked a lot harder in the 20s-30s than today.
Think coal mines, 10 year old child workers in factories and farms (non-blacks, so you can imagine what blacks’ conditions were like)
6 and one half work days a week….
Oh, Capitalism, how I adore you.
-
If it were not for the Communist/Socialist movement of the 20s and 30s most here would not have gone to Secondary School.
Well, you’re right about people’s pride back then caused them to refuse assistance (even with starving children) and to kick the man out of the house for not providing (rather than let him drive your car all day getting other women pregnant, like today’s women). So, point taken.
(I have a coworker who kicked her husband out last year for not working, but she’s from Jamaica, not the US.)
Still, buying a car (or radio) on credit when you don’t even have running water in the house, then losing it all when the repo man came around, that was stupid. (USofA, 1929)
Also, most people today wouldn’t want to ask a local business owner to extend them credit for a bag of beans, as they did in the 1930’s. They’d rather go to a payday lender or CC company so nobody has to know and end up paying 3000% on a bag of McLardburgers. What I’m saying is that some of us are actually MORE adverse to asking for things than our ancestors. With “hard times” that may change…
“With “hard times” that may change”…
And I think it will, there are many hard working people that will do what they have to do in order to feed, shelter and clothe their families. Getting back to basics will occur, I just think the resistance to making do with less will be fierce. We’ll get through it though.
Jas —
You clearly remain unimpressed by the Bernanke Fed’s all-out threat to create a Greater Reflation, including buying up $500 bn in MBS to reprime the mortgage lending securitization sump pump (at least the government version thereof). AG successfully kicked the housing bubble into overdrive by pushing interest rates all the way down to the floor. Why don’t you think it will work again, now that we have 0 pct Fed Funds? (This question is admittedly somewhat rhetorical, as I have my own reasons for doubting the plan will work…).
wmbz– Of course during 20s, Germany was the great debtor nation. Being a creditor who’s not getting ones money back is bad, but being a debtor squeezed for every pfennig is worse.
All these doomsday scenario’s will ONLY happen if trade barrier protectionism occurs. There will be extreme pressure on Obama from the unions, environmentalists and his own Congress to create these trade barriers. It will be interesting. The obvious outcome from globalization was downward wage pressures. To try and reverse that now, would be disasterous.
“…The obvious outcome from globalization was downward wage pressures”
To those with power & welath..this is a good thing, right?
–
Yes, Prof, I remain totally unimpressed by PROF. Bernanke. Only a moron would sit on a hot metal chair with burner underneath.
Jas
Harry Dent was interviewed by Stuart Varney on FBN last night. He stands by his prediction of a Great Depression coming up sometime this year, 2009, and hard times through 2020.
In the short term he’s in favor of gold. I think he has it wrong: Gold is a good long term investment because, as the professor Bear says above, Bernanke is a student of the Depression and is working hard at reflating. Once they get banks to let loose the credit, the barrior to inflation is knocked away.
If Paul Volcker is still alive and in the cabinet (whoever is president between now and 2016, there will be a drive to higher interest rates at the end when the evil inflation genie is let loose out of the bottle.
Gold in the short term will hit $2,000 per ounce.
LOL! Who will buy this gold as it rises to $2000 - not mister homeowner with his HELOC!
Gold, as in hard currency. Dollar will get cheaper in the long run. Lots of peoplw will gladly hold gold. If you held gold over the last year you would be glad too.
Not really as I would have bought at around $1000 and be down by over 10%!
all it will take is central bank selling to cause gold to fall in value. central banks will put a lid on gold prices. i never buy something that has gone up 100-200% in a few years be it houses, silver, gold, stocks or anything else! too much downside risk in my opinion. all the money entering the system is covering existing losses so i’m not convinced of inflation for a couple years out or more.
When France experienced inflation from their first experiment with paper money in the early 18th century, there was a flight to gold. Then it became illegal to hold gold and homes were searched to enforce it.
Didn’t something similar happen in the 30s in America?
@ Bill,
maybe it is a brain fart. if so ignore. Paul Volcker is currently advising Obama. I believe he is there to counter Lawrence Summers and Richard Rubin.
Paul Volcker is currently advising Obama. I believe he is there to counter Lawrence Summers and Richard Rubin.
Volcker is, in fact, one of the longest-serving economic advisers to the incoming president. I suspect that if Volcker were a little more spry (he’s 81), he would’ve been asked to take an even larger role in the next four years.
Volcker is the most valuable pick by Obama. If Volcker is there only for balance, at least there is balance. That’s a good thing.
It’s as if we are following a well worn script.
Act 2 coming up!
Perhaps it’s been mentioned here before (I’ve never noticed it suggested), but Studs Terkels’ “Hard Times” is a great read. Written in about 1970 with interviews of many folk that lived through the era. The stories run the gamut of plain folk to high-level politicians. Highly recommended.
Hey, I saw John/Eleanor/Monica/Pat/Mort last night too!
Best award of the night, IMO, was “worst political theatre” to the auto execs in the private jets. Most agreed on award was “15 minutes of fame” to not-Joe the not-plumber.
It seems we have entered the age of the middle ground and perpetual 3-way tugs of war. True capitalism only works until the proletariat is hit too hard, true socialism goes too nanny, true libertarianism makes life “nasty, brutal, and short” as Hobbes wrote. True globalism spreads the accumulated spoils of a few countries over many countries, true protectionism will cause global unrest through resources (oil first, soil and water later).
The Messiah can walk fences and thread needles just to keep the world from collapsing.
I try to watch that show and wind up turning it off. I cannot listen to 2-4 people screaming at each other. That is not reasoned discourse.
Yep….it would be great to watch if there was less time spent trying to talk over each other.
“All these doomsday scenario’s will ONLY happen if trade barrier protectionism occurs. ”
Not the only way.
World War I put an end to economic globalization effectively overnight upon the official outbreak - markets were booming right up until the day before. This did force some protectionism, but it was after the fact, not an initial policy choice, as I understand it.
After reading _The_Rise_and_Fall_of_the_Great_Powers_ I felt that US power would decline. It is only a question of when and by what mechanism.
US hyperpower is unnatural. We are better off controlling our descent than resisting it.
I’m not even convinced that in absolute terms we’ve been declining. Even as our proportion of the pie has been shrinking, the pie has been getting bigger. But we’ve been consuming an ever-increasing amount even though we haven’t really been producing an ever-increasing amount. This will make the inevitabel reckoning even worse.
Hahahaaha!! Controlled descent!! Is that when the pilot sends the plane into a tailspin and hits “EJECT”?
Well, in a word yes. First, I am not so certain about whether the US descent is controlled.
But, on to your example. A pilot hits EJECT because he has decided to control HIS descent and not worry about controlling the planes descent any more.
The US case is almost the opposite. We should control our descent by making friendly and neighboring countries prosperous, happy places. For example, the free trade agreement with Mexico may not enrich the US, but if Mexico becomes a happier place then our Southern border is much more secure.
–
Good morning and happy 2009 to all HBBers.
Case-Shiller prices are up 40% in real terms (adjusting for CPI) since the end of 1995. End of 1995 was a period when the economy had fully recovered from the prior recession and the bubbles lay in the future, i.e., a some what normal economy.
I fully expect the home prices in most areas to go back to 1995 prices, first in real terms and then in nominal terms as the deflationary depression makes itself felt and recognized by even the slowest to catch up with the reality of serious asset deflation leading to outright deflation in general prices.
Jas
Hiya, Jas, Happy New Year!
“…a some what normal economy”
Define nominal… as it applies to American citizen demographics circa 2009
Camera fades to black…cue camera #2…”and now from the weather desk…here’s… aLadinsane:”
“Due to projected global weather events resulting from human activity…Americans are doomed to import lower cost Chinese bottled water…no crops requiring water will be planted this year along the entire 300 mile stretch of the San Joaquin valley basin”
“During recent years, dairy farming has greatly expanded in importance. As areas such as Chino and Corona have become absorbed into the suburban sprawl of Los Angeles, many dairy farmers have cashed out and moved their herds to Kings, Tulare, and Kern counties. Since dairy farms emit considerable quantities of methane and other pollutants, this has exacerbated the region’s air quality problems. In addition, several high-profile incidents in which farmhands have drowned or suffocated in manure pits have led to calls to slow the proliferation of dairies in the region, with Kern County going so far as to declare a moratorium on new dairies in 2004.”
Needs updating:
Between 1990 and 2004, 28,092 hectares (70,231 acres) of agricultural land was lost to urban development in the San Joaquin Valley.[2] In an effort to confront the problem of urban sprawl, the eight Valley counties are participating in a “regional blueprint planning process” that may result in denser developments and more public transportation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Joaquin_Valley
too little, too late
we’re already regretting paving our farmland
I fully expect the home prices in most areas to go back to 1995 prices, first in real terms and then in nominal terms as the deflationary depression makes itself felt and recognized by even the slowest to catch up with the reality of serious asset deflation leading to outright deflation in general prices.
My ziprealty agent sent me a listing of a 1,400 sq foot Phoenix condo in a gated community. Built in 2005, HOA of $100 per month. $140,000.
I think you are right on the mark about 40% higher than 1995. I think it should be properly valued at $100,000. Yes, I think houses will return to 1995 prices while other items will continue to climb (gas, food, health care).
One main reason house prices have to fall is to account for the deterioration of former upscale neighborhoods due to low income Donald Trump wannabes trashing the once peaceful areas, as they got special low down payment loans and other exotic loans. Thanks socialist Barney Frank!
Price of canned salmon 12/1/08, $1.49; price on 1/3/09, $1.99. My cats vote for inflation.
Savers facing accounts with no interest…
Millions of savers are braced for zero per cent accounts within days as the Bank of England is poised to cut interest rates to the lowest level in its 315-year history.
Experts have warned the return on savings could plumb new depths with the Bank expected to take unprecedented steps to regain control over the economy.
They widely believe the Bank will reduce borrowing costs to below their 2 per cent level - and possibly all the way down to 1 per cent - in its first meeting of the year next week.
More than 7 million people have saving accounts which already pay interest of 1 per cent or less. If a cut is passed on in full by banks, these accounts will dive towards negative territory for the first time on record.
Many elderly people who rely on the income from savings have found themselves struggling in recent months as returns fall.
Just 18 months ago average interest rates on savings accounts were as high as 6 per cent. But consecutive cuts by the Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee have led to banks slashing their savings rates, with the current average rate being just 2 per cent.
The Daily Telegraph has launched a campaign aimed at giving pensioners a tax cut on the income earned from their savings and investments to help them during the recession.
Mark Dampier, of asset managers Hargreaves Lansdown, said: “It is a dire times for savers, especially for elderly people who rely on their income. They have already seen a sharp drop in excess of 50 per cent and can anyone tell me of someone in the public or private who would put up with a 50 per cent pay cut?”
A cut in interest rates raises the bizarre possibility that some savers may soon end up having to pay banks to keep money with them.
“A cut in interest rates raises the bizarre possibility that some savers may soon end up having to pay banks to keep money with them”.
Can this in turn cause a run on the bank? Taking more money out of the system.
That depends. People here already pay banks for a checking account. That why the poor don’t have checking accounts and check cashing places grew. Believe it or not, they are competitive with their biggest allure being no hassles in opening or maintaining an account, i.e. no actual accounts and no “gotcha” fees, account min, etc…
But what we don’t do is pay for a savings account. So I doubt they will put up with that as well.
But it depends on the mindset (perception).
Note from the Outer Banks, Cape Hatteras area - just got back from winter getaway, there for a week. For all of the communities on this barrier island, inventory backlogs (absorption times?) are in excess of
30 months. From Corolla, Duck, Nag’s Head, Kill Devil Hills, Rodanthe, Waves, Salvo and Avon. Didn’t investigate further south.
Oceanfront houses - the kinds on stilts that shake in the Atlantic winds and get eaten by the ocean as the dunes upon which they sit are eaten away by nor’easters - are now down to $795K (”Major price reduction!”). Most are still in the $900K ballpark. Rent rolls on these 5-7 BR behemoths are published at $30-$40K per year. These wishing prices are 25% below what they were last year at this time.
The local economy is heavily dependent on tourism. Talking to a shopkeeper, the rentals on these “vacation cottages” are down by 60% vs. last year. Wonder what that does to the published rent roll. Have a sneaking that it hasn’t been rolled into the nums yet. Feet on the street bear out the dropoff in business - there was very little life on the island, and stores which were open this time last year were shuttered up ‘for the season’. One of the chain plastic beach accessory cr*p purveyors (Waves) advertises a going out of business sale. Good. Its equally plastic competitor advertises “Everything 50% off!! No Gimmicks!” — I guess they didn’t get the memo from the mainland that retailers with actual provenance are doing it better, at 70% off.
The little gas-station-and-grocery-store places had little inventory. As in, no milk and Coke. More disturbingly, the Food Lion had no potatoes the day after Christmas. Their deliveries had been reduced in frequency.
I remember speaking with one of the prosperous real estate investors on the beach in 2003. She was effulgent with the great decision she had made to buy a beachfront behemoth for $1,000,000 in 2001.
The Outer Banks was every bit as frothy as anyplace in Calif, IMHO. I windsurfed with Canadians, Brits, Spaniards, French, Germans (!!) and Swedes in days of yore, and witnessed the Californication of a formerly sleepy, desolate place, with actual people who scramble for a living as fishermen, handypeople, EMTs, wait staff, housekeeping staff as the occasion presents itself throughout the year. The natives are authentic people.
It’s nice to see the behemoths crumble into matchsticks and get swallowed by the sea. Nevertheless, capitulation is not here yet,
given that the remaining ones are still priced the way they are.
Dunes were never meant to support huge structures on stilts. Particularly in an area where the storms are so fierce that the shipwrecks they have spawned have given the area the monicker “The Graveyard of the Atlantic”.
Still, glossy real estate rags galore. A few ads now have a tiny sidebar inviting us to call them for information on foreclosures.
I hope the behemoths all disintegrate. Return the place to the people who lived there to begin with. Crazy thinking, I know.
“I hope the behemoths all disintegrate. Return the place to the people who lived there to begin with. Crazy thinking, I know.”
Your point is well taken, I agree. Moreover, it seems other folks have reached the same conclusion - witness the New Year’s Eve dust up in another tourist hot spot - Aspen, CO. Reading stories of that fellow’s motives shows that some are getting just plain fed up with the equity locusts.
Great report, jane. I agree about the stilt homes. And yes, return the place to the people who lived there to begin with. I find it hard to have sympathy for people who build or buy in risky areas like beachfront, when their dwelling gets wiped out by mother nature.
Regarding the part about no potatoes, I noticed a similar thing when our local Publix had no Cornish hens between Christmas and New Year’s. Granted, Cornish hens are not exactly staples, but they’re a holiday meal. The butcher told me they didn’t come in on the truck. I think we’re going to start seeing more of these supply glitches.
“I think we are going to see a lot more of these supply glitches.”
With world trade slowing that makes a good bet. And along with these supply glitches will be an increase in prices for those items in short supply, and there are many people that will chalk these rising prices as strong evidence that it is inflation that prevails and not deflation, which is actually the case.
While not necessarily appropos of your post, another item that was discussed on the local Friday night pundity show was falling gas prices and the falling demand, people using less gasoline and how that equals less taxes, so there’s less revenue for govmint wastoids. So now they’re calling for tax hikes on gas. Sheesh.
So now they’re calling for tax hikes on gas. Sheesh.
In theory, we should be taxing the be-Xenu out of retail gasoline, in order to reduce demand and ass-rape the Arabs et al., but that money would undoubtedly be wasted..
Oregon is experimenting with putting a GPS in everyones car and charging by the mile
Can you say
1. Boondoggle - for the company that gets the contract for this.
Can you say
2. Waste of money - Collection of the gas tax is efficient and well established.
3. Can you say
not tamperproof.
4. Can you say
Big Brother
5. Can you say
stupid - Tax gas, if you are so worried about the army of electrics (which are few in # and travel short distances ) Then tax those few cars by the mile. Personally it’s a little schizophrenic to give them a tax break to encourage their use and then increase the tax on their use. ?????
If they can think it, you can pay for it.
Oh, also, I was in a fancy-pantsy toy store, looking at an exceptionally gorgeous baby device (I find things I like in shops, then look on craiglist by brand). The shop lady said, oh the prices on that will be going up 15% this week, because of the economy. I said, “whatchoo talkin’ about?” and she said that because of lowered demand, they will only special order the item per customer, so you pay more shipping etc. So, although the shop was having a 25% off sale, some items were +15%. D’oh!
Sidenote: this same shop chain (which sells massively insane items, like $14,000 chairs, which I have to say are quite fun to visit, like comfy sculptures you can sit in) is the one where the manager told me 4 years ago that stores who deal in luxury goods do not suffer during economic downturns. I heard that line of reasoning a lot (I think people were thinking of shops like Debenhams which weathered the GD very well). But I did wonder at the time, if there weren’t too many business operating under that logic. Plus, they didn’t have craigslist and ebay in the GD…
I was in my local Fred Meyer after Christmas, and their shelves were decimated. Turns out (as OlyGal will testify) I-84 was closed by snow between their OR warehouses and the stores here in ID. They didn’t get back to stocking until early this past week.
Although we had plenty of milk, potatoes, and onions for the obvious reason….
We just came back from Edisto Beach S.C. Below Charleston.The House we stayed in was still for sale, had the asking price dropped from $1.7 Mil. to $1.3 mil.(from a year ago).We bargained down on the rental,to $1100. for the week.They’ll all talk,because they’re desperate,to cover the taxes.The house hadn’t rented since Thanksgiving.The old-timers who’ve owned a long time there,will be all right.It’s all that new money that bought high that will & should be wiped clean.(And not by a Huricaine).
It’s all that new money that bought high that will & should be wiped clean.(And not by a Huricaine).
Dead on, from the grand strand all the way down the coast S.C. is far from immune. People were “paying” $ 900,000.00 for condos on Folly Beach for heavens sake, in ‘05/’06 many still clinging to hopes and wishes. I know a good many people on the coast, I do not talk to them about RE. It’s ‘different’ there…. Yea right, they will have their azz handed to them like everybody else.
One of my inlaws borrowed heavily against his house on the intercoastal in SC… now his job is in trouble… and the Sea-Ray is covered with bird doots…
I’d laugh, but he sent his poor kid to College of Charleston (scholarship–no money left for Ivy Leagues) with the admonition that junior needs to help him pay his “million dollar” mortgage…
SC… now his job is in trouble… and the Sea-Ray is covered with bird doots…
Tell him to dump the boat if possible, boats are fast becoming a dime a dozen and lots of boat owners are trying to hold on till spring. Ain’t gonna happen, the market is flooded now, by then holy crap!
If my plans included staying in the Tampa Area, I’d be trolling for an FB/Skiff owner…
The boat should have been the first thing to go. Also, he should have held onto his car (older BMW), let junior drive a Focus (who cares what his friends think?) and downsized the Sloburban.
He has an amazing capacity to eliminate reality… he’s emotionally attached to the boat but of course says he bought it “for the children” (the kids wouldn’t notice if you bought a used boat, hello?). Of course, even if he’d sold the boat last year when he was moaning about money he’d've taken a giant loss.
His new beemer probably looks bad when he’s trying to raise money to keep his job, lol.
Live by hyperspending, die by hyperspending.
Last year he was worried about money and thought to take the family to Prague (which is a beautiful city) instead of London. Just as a note, his family’s roots are in Mitteleuropa, not the British Isles. But he went ahead and spent a small fortune for a crappy time at the peak of the bubble “because the children begged.” You know, I’d take a solvent father and memories of the most beautiful orchards of Europe over the white Tower and $10 KFC… but that’s just me.
“Tell him to dump the boat if possible, boats are fast becoming a dime a dozen and lots of boat owners are trying to hold on till spring. Ain’t gonna happen, the market is flooded now, by then holy crap!”
Used boats, cars, motorcycles, their all a dime a dozen. And the prices are absolutely cratering. I’ve been watching a Vintage 1949 40′ Trawler on craigslist. The guy was originally asking around $30k. Just saw it again yesterday- “MUST SELL- $9K”.
*they’re, not their- I do understand the distinction.
“People were “paying” $ 900,000.00 for condos on Folly Beach”
You see. God does have a sense of humor!
Geez I can remember when $90,000 was over the top.
“People were “paying” $ 900,000.00 for condos on Folly Beach”
“Particularly in an area where the storms are so fierce that…”
Hey jane,
Does the old Atlantic still kick up lots of sea shells after a good storm? I once walked on that side of the sand spit at Kill Devil Hills and could not believe what was deposited on the beach. 107 years ago bicyclists were making balsa wood flying machines…I wonder what lies down the beach a 107 years…into the future?
(a cell phone the size of a piece of rice, planted in your ear lobe..with “you talk..it texts” technology)
Hwy50, yes indeed! Very good shelling, although many of the shells show the signs of remorseless grinding along the way, by the ocean action which finally spit them forth. Lots of driftwood as well - hard to say where those pieces came from. Certainly, the barrier islands are no place for big wood.
If you like picking up shells, Sanibel Island is sine qua non. Haven’t been down there in ages, but even in the 90s, it was clear that that place was totally unreasonable. Serious travel time to get there, right close to Naples and Fort Myers, no jobs…jeez Louise, maybe we’re looking at a return to affordability on par with the rest of Florida. Unfortunately, Sanibel really has very little character from original denizens who slugged it out with nature for generations, thereby deriving gumption. For the most part, the year round residents are flabby, painted, tucked and botox’d. But that is my prejudice. For me, “place” means “larger community”, however arms’ length it may be. Regardless of the beauty of place, if it’s got the contagion of Long Island accents and wasted lives, there’s no decent conversation to be had.
Present company excepted, as always.
You know, it really doesn’t make any sense to build more house on a sandbar than you can afford to lose.
thank goodness for FEMA, so working people everywhere can subsidize a few lucky high-on-the-hoggers when the inevitable “act of god” wipes the McBeachEstate away…
Actually, FEMA doesn’t pay to rebuild any waterfront property. The best they can do is offer low interest loans for repairs. And after the last hurricane here in MD, FEMA’s best rate was three points higher than I could negotiate with my own bank.
Most of those beach-front monsters require almost cash purchases or reserves held in escrow to purchase. When the hurricane takes it - it’s gone and the owner is on the hook.
Flood insurance does not cover tidal water damage. I imagine someone somewhere sells hurricane insurance but I can’t imagine the premium.
I should be more specific - hurricane insurance is available to protect against damages from wind or wind driven water. But as far as damage or complete destruction from tidal-driven water or surges I’m not aware of any commonly acquired insurance.
Talk about injustice. Good call!
I love these kind of real time boots on the ground post…Nice post jane…
Personal responsibility for ones debt?
Like many have been saying, credit card debt is next-up for the “forgive me my debt” borrowers. My sister, who has been in collections for seventeen years, works out of the Atlanta area with a large collections firm, and she’s told me throughout 2008 she’s seen credit card delinquencies rates growing. Today’s NYT business article about this problem:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/03/business/03collect.html?ref=business
“Lenders are reluctant to admit they will accept less than full payment, lest they encourage good customers to stop paying what they can.”
Just remember folks, your dollars are your real vote. If you don’t approve of these banks’ actions - vote with your dollars.
Take a walk around your neighborhood today and take a close look at all the bored clerks, salespeople, and personal bankers who would just love to get their hands on your dollars.
Can you outlast them, or can they outlast you?
Cash rules.
“Can you outlast them, or can they outlast you”?
Not a problem for me, I have spent years perfecting my ability not to spend money!
Me too. I love it when people’s need for my dollars exceeds their need for their assets.
I suppose i would love that too, except there isn’t anything on my wish list.
Stocks, perhaps? As people need cash they’ll be forced to bail out of financial assets.
Thank you, but I do not read the NYTimes.
In yesterday’s (2-2-09) edition of USA TODAY, Adam Shell had the leading story in the front page of the business section:
“Market gurus predict stock rebound but won’t rule out extreme move up — or down.”
Then he quoted Jeffrey Kleintop of LPL Financial:
“What happens further along the road depends on which fork the financial crisis takes us down.”
Wow, I’m impressed. I think I will start a subscription to USA Today. Oh, and here is my prediction for 2009: “The market will end 2009 somewhere in the range from -75% to +100%.” That should work for anybody, including Diane Swonk.
Oops. Here is the link:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/markets/2009-01-01-stock-outlook-2009_N.htm
Pathetic isn’t it, the amazing thing to me is how many people hang of the words of the so claimed experts.
A fellow I know told me once that if you want to stay on the cutting edge of the financial world tune to MSNBC. No kidding! Yep Maria Barcelona & company have it going on.
This is worse than Lereah and Yun combined:
The market will be up unless it is down.
+1 for logical correctness.
-10,000 for predictive power.
“The market will be up unless it is down.”
Please tell me this was inside a fortune cookie.
You can read/hear it daily on CNN, Yahoo, CNBC, whatever.
That’s what they say all day.
Also: The market is going up.
Aah, yes, the present continuous implying the continuation of what has just happened. That may be true in engineering and physics but it’s not true in the market.
Translation: The market has gone up so far, and we have no clue what it will do next.
That doesn’t garner you much television coverage.
Remind me again, why do we pay mutual fund managers?
George Carlin prediction:
“Forecast for tonight: Dark
Forecast for the morning: Light”
Last night the History Channel had a program “Crash: The Next Great Depression?” that compared the situation in 1929 and 2008. Both in terms of the nature of the bubble that we were facing, but also in terms of how we responded to it. Kind of interesting.
http://www.history.com/shows.do?action=detail&episodeId=380298
I expect they will run it again..
“I expect they will run it again..”
History chanel repeats itself.
Have people ever been so self-conscious about previous historical events and behaviour? I wonder if it will alter anything. Probably not, but it makes me curious.
It is 7 Deadly Sins week on the History channel.
“Will the Federal Reserve succeed in defeating deflation?” “What’s the worst possible way to fight deflation? Print money. We call this policy ‘Gonoism,’ after Zimbabwe’s top man at its central bank - Gideon Gono. Gono did what neither the U.S. in the ’30s nor Japan in the ’90s was able to do. He made prices go up - 230 million percent in a single year. Of course, he destroyed the economy completely… So Dr. Bernanke won’t be the first. And we may not get to 230 million percent. Maybe 20%. But even at that level the destruction will be massive.” This is the opinion of financial news publisher Bill Bonner who believes the Fed will succeed in re-kindling monetary inflation.
Since the Fed has the printing press it makes sense to assume that it will use it to flood the economy with money and revive inflation. But we notice that trillions of dollars of value have disappeared from balance sheets while the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve are only pumping in billions. We notice, too, that Barack Obama is committed to fighting deflation with the money-printing presses. He’ll regret it.
Bottom line: If you believe heavy inflation lies ahead you should be taking on debt to be paid off with cheaper money. Remember the tale of the German physician who borrowed money in the early 1920s to buy a herd of cattle for his farm. Within a few months he sold one cow and paid off his entire debt!
In high inflation the lender takes a beating. In deflation it’s the debtor who is hurt.
It’s annoying to have to guess the outcome of the tug of war. My guess is that the forces in both directions are powerful and that the tug will not move things much in either direction.
There won’t be inflation until
1. Overcapacity has been taken care of, ie manufacturing collapse (in progress)
2. They start getting that money into the hands of people who will spend it (It’s a confidence game). I think this is the big hurdle. I think if they slashed taxes for the middle class (One time rebates won’t change psychology) and start works programs my stance on inflation vs deflation will start to change. Lending the middle class money won’t work that genie is out of hte bottle. For now I”m in combotechies deflation camp.
Take on debt? No that’s called Russian Roulette. And you’re playing with a gun that has just one empty chamber.
Credit destruction is inherently deflationary. If you think that monetary easing will not only counter deflation (it won’t) but go so far as to be inflationary, then I have a bridge to sell you.
Bernanke may want to do something that stupid. So might Paulson. But the bond / treasury market has them both by the family jewels. Let them try to inflate their way out of this mess.
There are forces bigger than they are which will firmly say “no”.
+17
We’re all waiting with baited breath to see what will happen. Dire times, indeed.
Some thoughts on the CALPERS crisis:
I followed those links offered yesterday and read up on the massive retro increases to public employees’ pensions in recent years. I agree that’s unfair, although I disagree with the ditch the pension entirely argument. Like some of the dissenters in the comments, there are some very qualified people who accepted lower pay in the public sector with the promise of a decent pension down the line. Recent experience in Virginia, when one of their long line of feckless governors turned out the “dead weight” in DOT and then had to rehire all the senior people as consultants just to get anything done, shows that nominal consultant fees run much higher than the original salary. Of course, the consultant must pay self-employment tax and fund their own pension, plus you have the equipment costs (oops), and of course there’s the whole job insecurity thing.
What I remember from the 1990’s is that some consultants struggled to get jobs and looked for a real job avidly, while others became stars and made far more than they ever had at their former employer, rising in status and pay. OOPS.
Okay, so this isn’t rocket science or anything, but I think the reason the public employees got so “greedy” is because of the housing bubble. Housing bubble (10x income)–> extremely high cost of living. Remember the old saw about the schoolteachers not being able to afford living in their own district?
But why the housing bubble? Why California? Looking at typical wages in California, where it seems like any dumbass with a college degree can easily pull in $100K a year, it seems to me like US dollars are worth a lot less in California than elsewhere. Why is this? Probably the tech bubble. Huge amounts of funny money floating around. California reminds me of Spain after the conquistadores. Spain gained enormous amounts of gold. Great, right? We’re rich, we’re rich! Soon, the gold begins to circulate. Since gold is in high supply, inflation escalates. At the end of it, Spain is broke (and stays that way for centuries).
This also explains why Cali is overrun with illegals. Somebody has to fill all those low level jobs. Here in low cost Florida, I see native Floridians riding the bus to their hotel cleaning jobs (one of the worst-paying, sh88iest jobs there is, especially when your employer cheats on your payroll taxes–true story). But in Cali, you have mestizos, driven off their dry farms (thanks, Texas) looking for some hard cash (USD worth a lot more in Monterey, MX than Monterey, CA) and willing to bunk up 11 in one McMansion squatter special so they can save enough to wire a little home. Americans from the lowest echelon of society do not dream of saving a little dinero from their below-min-wage undocumented job so they can buy a little farm in Latin America where they don’t even speak the language (some middle class edjumacated people do, but they don’t work these jobs). But if you’re from Guadalajara, coming home in three years with a little money to start a tidy little business and be a member of the middle class, hey, that doesn’t sound so bad. Those USD are worth more to those taking them than they were to those giving them.
So if California collapses, put its name next to Spain. Whether it was Dotcom clownbucks, Googleaires, or MEWs, the oversupply of greenbacks drove them all into the poorhouse. Deflation, severe deflation, would drive down the cost of living and mean less jobs for undocumented labor. So, bad for them, but this wasn’t supposed to be a gravy welfare train for Mejiko.
tech contracting and a lot of that money going elsewhere would be the best possible outcome for California, I think…
then they can bring down the agri-barons… why our we paying billions to grow cotton in California? no water, amigo, so hang that s+++ up.
why “are” we… damn
Looking at typical wages in California, where it seems like any dumbass with a college degree can easily pull in $100K a year, it seems to me like US dollars are worth a lot less in California than elsewhere.
I think that this statement is a slight exageration, at least the “dumbass” part.
The unemployment rate in California is relatively high, and I expect it will stay that way.
Underemployment is as big a problem as unemployment in Cali…
I haven’t researched this carefully (not relevant to my life) but I keep running in to people saying they pull in 110 or 100 doing stuff that would earn 32-38 everywhere but NYC metro.
Money mag a year or two ago featured a couple of RNs making $80k each in CA (and making out like bandits). Shands in Gville, FL pays $30K. Seriously. (They suck.) In other parts of the country you might make $50-70. RN’s only do two years of nursing school, no college necessary. The shifts are killers, though (literally). LPNs do 4 years of nursing school and supposedly get paid better.
I think you have RN and LPN roles reversed; at least as far as education and professional licensing requirements. Try Wikipedia.
Yeah, many friends in my SoCal group have masters degrees, and none of us make over 100K. We work in tech, education, management, but i guess we’re losers for not tapping into the gravy train of bubble income jobs.
“Your welcome”.
-native Texan
spot on!
Gator, I think you make some excellent points.
As a native Californian, I can assure you that most of us are competing against some very wealthy people. It’s not only tech billionaires, but people in the entertainment industry (lots of money, especially in L.A.), real estate industry, financial industry, and lots of money that comes in from other countries — oil money from the Middle East, and many wealthy people from other countries have homes in California.
California — especially southern CA — tends to have two very disparate social classes. Either you are rich, or you are poor. There is very little “middle class” here. Even those who are technically “middle class” tend to live among the poor or live in fairly dangerous neighborhoods.
LMAO…Ya think?
“$2 trillion this year, an unprecedented increase that could test the world’s appetite for financing U.S. government spending”.
U.S. Debt Expected To Soar This Year
$2 Trillion Increase May Test Federal Ability to Borrow
By Lori Montgomery
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, January 3, 2009; Page A01
With President-elect Barack Obama and congressional Democrats considering a massive spending package aimed at pulling the nation out of recession, the national debt is projected to jump by as much as $2 trillion this year, an unprecedented increase that could test the world’s appetite for financing U.S. government spending.
For now, investors are frantically stuffing money into the relative safety of the U.S. Treasury, which has come to serve as the world’s mattress in troubled times. Interest rates on Treasury bills have plummeted to historic lows, with some short-term investors literally giving the government money for free.
But about 40 percent of the debt held by private investors will mature in a year or less, according to Treasury officials. When those loans come due, the Treasury will have to borrow more money to repay them, even as it launches perhaps the most aggressive expansion of U.S. debt in modern history.
With the government planning to roll over its short-term loans into more stable, long-term securities, experts say investors are likely to demand a greater return on their money, saddling taxpayers with huge new interest payments for years to come. Some analysts also worry that foreign investors, the largest U.S. creditors, may prove unable to absorb the skyrocketing debt, undermining confidence in the United States as the bedrock of the global financial system.
“…an unprecedented increase that could test the world’s appetite for financing U.S. government spending…”
What I don’t get:
Where is the world going to find all this extra cash to loan out to the U.S., with an ever-worsening global recession on the boil?
Not only that, but they will extract their cash as/if the value of the dollar declines and the interest rates on Treasuries rise.
I think there could be a massive spike in long-term interest rates as the first major market event greeting Obama after the OIE (Obama Inauguration Extravaganza™). When this exacerbates the downward pressure on GDP, I expect Obama to ask for (and be granted) emergency powers. This will be the beginning of the road eventually leading to nationalization of aggregate demand, aka communism.
The Fed is buying long-term T-bonds, no? Doesn’t having a buyer of last resort with no budget constraint have the potential to keep l-t T-bond interest rates below 3 pct forever?
They say they will, but they haven’t. It’s bizarre if you think about it. The Fed is trying to jawbone all rates lower. So, the Fed seems to be saying, hey, keep holding these bonds. But the worse the economy the better for the bondholders, generally speaking. So the Fed talks about doing everything it can to stimulate the economy but seems to want people to make the bet the economy will stay in recession/deflation indefinitely.
I don’t think Bernanke has any idea what he’s doing. Or, more precisely, I don’t think he has any idea of the efficacy of what he is doing. My bet is the dollar will be weak and that you simply can’t hold long rates down with a weak currency.
The sudden crescendo of bullishness in the stock market over the past week isn’t helping bonds, of course - it will be interesting to see what happens to bonds on a big down day in the market. I’m sure we’ll get at least one of those this week.
Where is the world going to find all this extra cash to loan out to the U.S., with an ever-worsening global recession on the boil?
How much is it worth for the Chinese gov’t to keep employment up, in order to prevent revolutionary unrest? Methinks a Chinese tax on savings in order to buy US debt (if not outright confiscation) is a possibility…
I’ve been under the impression that the Federal Reserve will end up buying any new treasuries that investors aren’t willing to buy… Even at 0% interest rate. In effect, this seems to be basically printing money, and doesn’t rely on investors (foreign or otherwise) buying the treasuries. Which would seem to mean that interest rates could stay low despite all this inflationary funny money.
“I’ve been under the impression that the Federal Reserve will end up buying any new treasuries that investors aren’t willing to buy… Even at 0% interest rate.”
I think what this could do is make treasuries as worthless as the leveraged mortgages that they will trade for.
Palmetto or Muir:
I write here occasionally, and am a 53 year old male who cannot aford another mistake. I bought/sold (honestly and without greed) three little places in New Port Richey and Spring Hill. Got out in 2006, and made a little money. My question is, I see 45K nice homes (non-short some of them, in Caope Coral Florida. 3 bed 2 bath, 2 car garage, 2005 build. PLEASE tell me not go down there and why at 35 sq. ft. Something must be wrong if there are so many of them on the market.
Finally, I thank you for your time to respond very much. Best blog on the net right here!
ATE, bring up Cape Coral on google maps, switch to sat, and enjoy the beautiful crop circle-like abandoned developments.
Hi, ATE-UP and Lord love ya for making a profit in New Port Richey and Spring Hill, because as you probably know, a lot of people have been caught there with a tit in the wringer and can’t unload their properties, even at pre-bubble prices.
I don’t know why you’d want to buy in Cape Coral, unless you’re ready to kick back and take it easy. If you don’t have to make money on what you buy down there, by all means, purchase a home there for the lowest price possible. The only thing really wrong with Cape Coral is that there are no jobs there. It’s strictly retirement. Fishing, golfing, etc. In many ways, the market in Cape Coral is very similar to the market in New Port Richey/Spring Hill. So, if you’re not going to buy in NPR/SH, why buy in Cape Coral? At least NPR/SH is sort of in the Tampa Bay area, which makes it a marginally better job market. The main drawback, IMHO, is the sinkhole issue, which Cape Coral doesn’t have. But if I had to bet on which market would revive first, my money’s on NPR/SH. Oh, also, I think Cape Coral has a better chance of getting hit with a hurricane than NPR/SH.
All that could be summed up by saying that what’s wrong with Cape Coral is the same thing that’s wrong with NPR/SH, generally speaking.
Also, don’t buy anything built new between 2004-2006, especially in the Cape Coral/ Ft. Myers area, on account of the Chinese drywall issue.
RE: I see 45K nice homes (non-short some of them, in Caope Coral Florida. 3 bed 2 bath, 2 car garage, 2005 build. PLEASE tell me not go down there and why at 35 sq. ft. Something must be wrong if there are so many of them on the market.
$45k?
Must be palaces…how about $15k in AZ?
LMAO…this WSJ story tells it all. Fraud right from the git-go.
…and the Pelosi & Frank Dog and Pony show think their gonna clean this all up.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123093614987850083.html
Wow. Thanks for the link, hd74man. That place does not even qualify as a house. It’s a shack. The whole loan process was crooked from the beginning to the very end. From the article:
“When Wells Fargo sold Ms. Halterman’s loan to London-based HSBC, it got bundled with 4,050 other mortgages and used as collateral for a security issued in July 2007. More than 85% of the mortgages were, like Ms. Halterman’s, “subprime” loans to borrowers with blemished credit, according to Tom Atteberry of First Pacific Advisors LLC, a Los Angeles investment-management company.
Credit-ratings firms Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service gave the new security their top “triple-A” ratings, which suggested investors were extremely likely to get their money back plus interest. S&P declined to explain its assessment. A Moody’s spokesman didn’t respond to requests for comment.”
Nice job Moody’s, Wells, and Co. Nice, nice job.
And yet there are people on this blog who STILL blame the “po’ folks” and Barney Franks.
What’s amazing is that this was bundled and rated in July of 2007…when everything had already started to unravel.
Those who were watching the ABX index knew that these loans were problematic in 2006. One might wonder if regulators were still turning a blind eye at that point.
Got the same gig going on here. Northport, CapeCoral and Lehigh Acres are way ahead of the entire country which tells me they’ll be in recovery mode ahead of all other areas. However, there seems to be a strong downdraft in FL that’s not letting up. Only 6 months ago I thought $80k($250k in 2006) for a 3/2 shack laid up in 2006 was a bargain. They’re down to $60k asking price right now. The 80k wasn’t so much of a bargain it seems. Not that I can’t afford to say bye bye to $20k but what’s the sense when I know the duration of the bottom will be a long one.
Hi there, ATE-UP.
I am financing some wannabe flippers who bought a 3/2 in Cape Coral two months ago, $68K paid to Deutsche Bank. I lent $54.4K towards the purchase. My thinking was, if I end up owning the place for $54.4K it ’s not a disaster. I did visit the neighborhood, and no, it is NOT an “abandoned crop circle.” More houses were occupied in October 08 than unoccupied, though it was clear not all were occupied.
So far, the borrowers are making their payments promptly (at 10% per annum, 15-year amortization). They have the place on the market, asking I think $85K after some minor repairs. Of course they would settle for less, but I don’t think they are going to reduce fast enough to meet the competition. Time will tell.
(I’m still mainly an) az_lender
“it is NOT an “abandoned crop circle.”
Have you liked at google images sat? IMHO, this is one region of Florida that could go the way of Buffalo/Detroit. I see no reason why Cape Coral couldn’t be home to the $25k 3/2 house.
Seriously, scan around the entire region. It looks like a Led Zeppelin album cover.
http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o72/muggyFL/CC1.jpg
http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o72/muggyFL/CC2.jpg
http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o72/muggyFL/CC3.jpg
ATE-UP,
1285 sq foot house for 45K.
5 posters ahead of me gave their insights, here’s mine.
If you intend to live in the house, it’s a good deal.
I would pay cash and go without insurance.
If it’s for an investment there is only one question to ask: can you rent it?
As it was pointed out, that area is not economically healthy. Can you keep a tenant, call the sheriff and evict a non-paying one? Can you live with months of unpaid rent?
If you are ok with the above questions and have a long timeline, it’s a may be a good investment.
But I will be honest, for my money, both you and az_lender are going on the wrong trail.
If you want to invest in Real estate in FL, there are much better places.
At $75 psft you will be able to buy in much better places within a year.
Just my 2 cents.
Check out this web site www herman cain dot com. He’s starting a movement to take our country back. He’s a radio commentator in Atlanta.
Yesterday’s lively discussion on milk production from the NYT (Motto: Lets not bother to check facts) as opposed to deflation or inflation is more a result of government interference.
Mailbox money is still over $15. Apr, 2008 $25.50 Nov, 2006 $11.27 - Government loan support is $11.00
The problem for the country is not the demand, but the cost of production (particularly for California) has jumped.
The economic situation that farmers face is complex, said Bill Bruins, president of the Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation.
“We are ending a year that took many commodity prices on a roller coaster ride. The record high prices we saw for corn and soybeans last summer are a distant memory, but the elevated prices we paid for inputs like fertilizer, seed and diesel have not come back down to earth as fast.” Dec 30, 2008
My sons will have to make a decision shortly on what if any crops to plant. The cost of production exceeds the price of the commodity so we will probably not plant anything but grass (hay). Cows like grass and do just fine. Diesel is now as low as it was in Feb, 2008 and it was high then.
Most other manufactured commodities (herbicides, fertilizer, seed, etc) are up 100 -400% over 2007.
So it is cheaper to cut production than to lower the price. Food will not get cheap, there is demand for it. There are few banks willing to lend money in the international markets. This is a world wide problem.
The commodities spike crushed business profit margins and ruined balance sheets across the globe (high input costs followed by plummeting finished good selling prices). Businesses are slashing var costs like employment rolls to compensate.
Prices and demand may not increase as expected b/c consumers were already cutting expenses and substituting during the commodity spike. Now that unemployment is increasing and a recession declared, they may continue along the same behavioral track.
hoz,
My LL plowed under 50 acres of grass with big plans to grow corn on the field next year. I’m betting is just lays there unplanted.
People forget we had a fear and greed driven commodities spike in response to yesteryear’s Fed rate cuts. As with other asset spikes, there is always hoarding and hedging. Which gives the impression there is ever increasing demand. Which leads to supply expansions. The cliff diving we are witnessing across the globe is the result of excess supply meeting crushing demand.
I know this one guy who bought enough flour, noodles, rice, and dried milk to last 18 months. With falling consumption, he’ll probably be able to stretch these commodities to 24 months. Central planning has never worked and never will. It always leads to distortions. Ironically some people look at the current carnage the Fed created and argue it’s a good thing the Fed started cutting rates when it did. These people don’t understand behavior.
Go back to the milk article. Same applies for meat just ask pilgrims pride. When the livestock numbers get cut (which is happening) There will be a huge drop off in demand for grain. I think there is plenty of demand destruction to come for food. The next wave might be demand destruction from population destruction as hungry people are more likely to riot, kill their neighbor or local gov official ect. Developed countries will send third world countries less money which means more disease and malnutrition.
He should have bought sugar, cocoa, gold, and hogs.
If I had to live on flour, noodles, rice, and dried milk I’d at least try to get to an ashram, where I would expect to derive additional positive benefits from asceticism.
sugar, cocoa, gold, and hogs
This sounds like quite an exciting lifestyle, if you stocked up your lair with these 4 items.
Actually, those were the only four commodities that advanced in price this year.
I am buying my own cow.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20602013&sid=aujZ2RelXaXE&refer=commodity_futures
I can get a calf for $45 fatten it up for a year. $80 per month for feed.
Butcher it $100. Total $1105 plus I get manure for my vegetable garden.
In the Midwest, it is not uncommon for four families (or so) to share a whole pig (or a whole cow.)
They get it butchered, and many have outdoor ice-boxes since it’s freezin’ cold all winter anyway.
“…many have outdoor ice-boxes since it’s freezin’ cold all winter anyway”
This method of energy conservation doesn’t work in North Dakota: Freezer Burn
You cant wrap it in butcher paper? Or does it just get so cold it doesn’t matter?
A neighbor of mine decided to butcher his own cow. Pulled it up next to a cart, put a 45 to it’s head and shot it. The cow fell in away from the cart. Getting the cow back on the cart required quite a few neighbors. It gave a new meaning to the term dead weight.
We just got our Christmas half-hog from grandma’s farm. There’ll be another on the 4th of july. Add in 4-6 deer and it takes a big bite out of the famil food bills.
I suspect you’ve never done “cow math” IRL.
We did that a few times on our farm.
Much satisfaction was derived from feeding that ol’ steer, knowing that by the end of the year when it was time for it to go to cow heaven, I was going to be eating quite well, thankyouverymuch.
me too, but I didn’t start with a $45 newborn orphan and expect to be getting steaks and roasts in 12 months.
Peter, do you really have what it takes to do this with ONE cow? With a few head of anything, you develop a personal relationship with each one. Show me a one cow rancher, and I will show you an animal that is sleek, well groomed, engaging, moseys on over when called, and is approximately 13 years old.
Ditto for chickens, pigs, etc.
You’re going to eat Norman?
http://www.collider.com/uploads/imageGallery/City_Slickers/billy_crystal_city_slickers_movie_image.jpg
From the Washington Post.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/02/AR2009010202226.html
“I just had a call from a guy this morning who wanted to refinance his $800,000 mortgage into a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage,” Larry F. Pratt, chief executive of First Savings Mortgage, said yesterday. “He couldn’t believe it when he heard the rates he’d have to pay.”
Jumbo rates spiked to unusual highs as mortgage markets were unraveling in the last half of 2007, creating a setback for borrowers in expensive housing markets like Washington.
The whole article makes it sound like 7% is some sort of crazytown insanely high mortgage rate that we haven’t seen since the late 70s/early 80s. When I bought my house in 1999 (conforming, 66% LTV,) I was paying 7.65%. If you can’t afford 7% you HAD NO BUSINESS GETTING AN ARM. Heck at least the specuvestors were just betting their credit rating. Idiots who bet the house that interest rates would never return to the that they had been LESS THAN 10 YEARS AGO are the kind of stupid that I would have hoped was much less common than turns out to be the case.
It ain’t the rate, it’s the principal of the loan that is worrying!
This mattered very little when the value of homes were going up in value each year by than the owner’s annual mortgage payment. But how does that 7 pct interest look to the owner of a $700,000 loan to a loanowner whose home is down from the peak by 40 pct?
- Loss of home equity = 40% * $700,000 = $280,000
- 7 pct interest payment on $700,000 loan = $49,000
- Annual rent on similar home = $2500/mo * 12 = $30,000
You can tweak the numbers if you want to make the example more realistic, but the point will hold up.
P.S. The real rub:
If the home is down from the peak by 40 pct, then its current market value is
60% * $700,000 = $420,000,
so the owner’s effective interest payment (his interest payment as a share of the market value of the home) is
$49,000 / $420,000 * 100 = 11.7%.
I believe that 14+ % interest… is even more effective!
Well yes, many are now discovering that if you’re upside down, you can’t refinance. But the article was about rates, and I was particularly irritated by the idea that 7% was a high interest rate. It’s not. It’s a perfectly reasonable rate for a 30 year FRM.
The lenders are trying to push adjustable rate loans as the cheaper alternative.
Again?
I actually think that the market is STARTING to price in the possibility that inflation (and therefore interest rates) will take off.
From the article:
If all else fails, borrowers in need of a jumbo loan may consider taking out a five-year adjustable-rate jumbo because those are cheaper, Gumbinger said.
For those who already have an adjustable jumbo, sit tight. If it’s adjusting now, you may be getting a lower rate, he said.
Thanks for the math without fear equation.
7.65% with 34% down? I have mortgaged 3-4 properties since 1999 and never put more then 20% down and never had a rate higher then 6.5%.
Keep in mind, in 1999 mortgages were competing with dot bombs for capital. The people I bought from lost 5k nominal on the house. And “other debts” was fairly high because MOST of that downpayment came from a 401(k) loan. (4.875% for 15 years, but secured by my balance instead of the house.)
Ben Jones,
I sure hope this house is nowhere near your AZ neighborhood…
Wall Street Journal
* REAL ESTATE
* JANUARY 3, 2009, 10:14 A.M. ET
Would You Pay $103,000 for This Arizona Fixer-Upper?
That Was Ms. Halterman’s Mortgage on It; ‘Unfit for Human Occupancy,’ City Says
By MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS
AVONDALE, Ariz. — The little blue house rests on a few pieces of wood and concrete block. The exterior walls, ravaged by dry rot, bend to the touch. At some point, someone jabbed a kitchen knife into the siding. The condemnation notice stapled to the wall says: “Unfit for human occupancy.”
Shocking.
It takes “integrity” to swindle an over-edicated 61 year old… I’d say $9,143.00 is a rather low value on anyone’s “moral compass”
“…At closing, on Feb. 26, 2007, Integrity collected $6,153 in underwriting, broker, loan-origination, document, application, processing, funding and flood-certification fees, mortgage documents show. A few days later, Integrity transferred the loan to Wells Fargo, earning $3,090 more, Mr. Rybicki says.”
Avondale is near the I-10, Ben Jones is near the I-40, I think. Hence, not near one another.
i would think the story is funny but the result in the end is that we all covered the losses by the banks. through our national debt those of us who did not participate will pay in the end through economic decline or higher taxes to pay for all these losses. and meanwhile the bankers get paid. I don’t feel sorry for the owner as she lives on the lamb and got all that free cash through refi’s, with a family full of copper thieves and drug users. was this a drop house with 26 people living there? stories like this are why i have no sympathy for these people getting evicted. of course sounds like fraud occured with the appraisal too! i’m happy for the neighbors who got to tear down that eyesore! they should tear down more of these dumps!
Take home lessons from the collapsing credit bubble:
- Flooding the monetary system with helicopter drops of cash can lead to bad household and business decisions.
- A critical mass of bad household and business decisions due to an excess supply of easy money results in a global credit tsunami.
- Money is made of paper or entries in a computer memory; real wealth is not.
- “The Federal Reserve’s job is to take away the punch bowl just when the party gets going.”
William McChesney Martin Jr.
Chairman, Federal Reserve Board
Where art thou oh Shakespeare & Bunyan?
“…Stuyvesant takes up a third of a city block and is situated between the Cathedral of Deliverance and the Citizens Advice Bureau…”
“Christian, an everyman character, is the protagonist of the allegory, which centers itself in his journey from his hometown, the “City of Destruction” (”this world”), to the “Celestial City” (”that which is to come”: Heaven) atop Mt. Zion. Christian finds himself weighed down by a great burden…
(an innovative home loan, promoted by the “Maestro” Sir Greenisspent. 0% down…40 years repayment…no qualifying) …After just 3 years, Christian is chained & shackled to another “financial innovation” called a HELOC, one day while standing in line at a 7/11 ATM..he meets a fellow named: Inigo Montoya, a “strawberry picker” who informs Christian that he too has bought a home near Bakersfried, CA as well has his BIL & x6 cousins all with 0% down. About this time… in a downtown Manhattan private luxury apartment, a fellow named Mr. Made-Off, receives a call from a famous Hollywood movie producer…
Madoff Accepted $10 Million Six Days Before Arrest:
“…The attorney said that “we feel pretty good that our money we wired to Chase bank is still there,” adding that $10 million has been set aside by lawyers for the trustee until the claim is resolved. He declined to estimate what percentage of the Rosenman family fortune the funds represented.”
“It was not their nest egg,” he said. “While it is a lot of money, it is not something that will dramatically affect their life.”
Not long ago I got a sucmyjawaya dollar coin in change from the post office. Later that day at another store the check out girl didn’t want to take it, said it didn’t look real.
This story shows how well informed some at banks are…
From the Minneapolis Star Tribune:
Q. My late wife and I kept Eisenhower dollar coins as a way of saving money, and I have about 50 of them. I went to my bank to cash them in, but they wouldn’t take them. They said that the Federal Reserve will no longer accept them and they are considered collectible only and are no longer legal tender. Is that true? How can the government issue money and then decide not to accept it as money? What do I do now?
A: It is not true. Eisenhower dollars are legal tender and accepted by Federal Reserve Banks, said Patti Lorenzen, with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. So you can take the coins back to your bank and demand that they accept them, but you may not want to. An Eisenhower dollar from the 1970s, un-circulated, can be worth $6 to $8 (circulated ones are worth up to $1.50). Value varies depending on the coin and its condition.
(note: All U.S. coins from 1792 to the present time are legal tender at face value. This means that a 1964 quarter-dollar, containing 90 per cent pure silver, is legal tender at face value just like a 1965 quarter-dollar made of copper and nickel. Not many people are foolish enough to spend old coins at face value.)
–
http://online.barrons.com/article_print/SB123094654808750783.html?mod=9_0031_b_this_weeks_magazine_main
Saturday, January 3, 2009
Why India Won’t Rebound Soon
By VEN RAM
India’s stock market may look attractive after its massive slide, but there’s probably more pain to come. A host of economic and political challenges could keep a new bull market at bay for more than a year.
FOR THOSE TEMPTED TO WADE INTO THE INDIAN STOCK MARKET with a view to making a quick killing after its massive slide, consider the advice that Punch magazine once gave a person who was about to marry: Don’t.
Although India’s benchmark Sensex has fallen about 55% from its peak a year ago, the market is still not attractive as a short-term investment. November’s terror attacks in Mumbai aren’t even the half of it: The Indian economy, valuation issues and broad political uncertainty all argue for real caution…
“Even as absolute valuations have corrected, India’s relative valuations remain rich,” says Ridham Desai, India Strategist at Morgan Stanley. The market’s price-to-earnings multiple, based on expected earnings for the next 12 months, is 60% higher than that of emerging markets as a group. And its price-to-book ratio is a whopping 72% higher.
India fares no better on the dividend-yield front. The roughly 2% dividend yield on the Sensex pales in comparison to what is available in some of the more advanced economies. The dividend yield for the Australian market, for example, is an eye-popping 6.5%, while most other regional markets offer yields well north of 5%.
Seshadri Sen, Associate Director, Research and India strategist at Macquarie Capital Securities, says that even though the Indian markets are trading at just nine times forward earnings, investors need to exercise caution in interpreting that multiple.
“With all the earnings cuts that we have seen from companies, what appears cheap may not be so,” he says. “We are seeing a fairly sharp slowdown in the economy, but it remains to be seen whether the markets have discounted all the bad news that is in store.”
…
The Bottom Line:
A new bull market in India may be at least 15 months away, thanks to a host of economic and political challenges.
…
“The Bottom Line:
A new bull market in India may be at least 15 months away, thanks to a host of economic and political challenges.”
Question: what role does poverty play in India & China? Is the goal there to have economic systems in place that rises all boats at the same time…even the vinyl 29 cent ones with super glue patches?
–
Quotes:
“The Only thing to kill America is from inside.” — John Rutledge
[I agree! And evildoers in power have done the dirty deed.]
“The length and severity of depressions depend partly on the magnitude of the ‘real’ maladjustments, which developed during the preceding boom and partly on the aggravating monetary and credit conditions.” — Gotfried Haberler, Prosperity and Depression, 1937
[from Prudent Bear]
Jas
If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.
Thomas Jefferson
–
We had two evil bankers’ agents, Greenspan and Bernanke, in a row with unprecedented powers. That is more than what our economy could handle.
If no one minds my saying it:
Americans became experts at ignoring warnings issued long time ago by their most trusted and respected leaders.
Anyone has good explanation as to why, or how?
Jas
“Anyone has good explanation as to why, or how?”
Stupidity. Dumbing down of the educational system. Greed, blindly listening to punditry without evaluating the data. Fear, some of it justified.
But for the good folks, many are afraid of speaking out. I’ve seen posts about it on this board. People won’t speak out to family members and friends, for fear of getting cut off, creating arguments, being shunned, etc.
Many of us here are responsible. But fail to insist that others take responsibility, too. And as a result, we do suffer some of the effects created by the less responsible and the less intelligent. I mean, if you saw a little kid reaching out to touch a hot stove, wouldn’t you slap his hands away, even if it meant the kid would be momentarily upset with you?
I am just as guilty as others of silence, when I should have spoken.
–
Thanks. Would your answer qualify as confirming my observation that Americans, in general, were doped, much more than in the past, say, 50 or 100 years ago, with lack of skepticism of the motives of those in power, especially, the economic elite?
I realize that this conclusion is very unpopular.
Jas
America 1776: There is not a truth existing which I fear… or would wish unknown to the whole world.
- Thomas Jefferson
America 2009: You can’t handle the truth!!
- Col Jessup
–
One of my favorite movies!
Jas
It’s funny you raise the speaking out topic. Although 50 or more pct of the men and women at the New Years Eve party were having housing troubles, they still looked down at me as a poor hopeless renter without much of a future.
Historical point of note: That Jefferson remark was made in 1802 when the roguish reporter Callendar from the Richmond Recorder was in a dispute with Jefferson (Callendar was seeking an appointment as a local postmaster which was a powerful position and which Jefferson would not give him). Callendar made a veiled blackmail threat concerning Jefferson’s rumored relation with Sally Hemings as well as his having made inappropriate advances to another married woman when her husband was away. Callendar, of course, went on to rail at length against Jefferson, and his columns were picked up and reprinted by many Federalist/anti-Republican newspapers, which caused Jefferson a lot of consternation. But , alas, Jefferson was re-elected in 1804, while Callendar, a drunk, passed out and drowned in three feet of water. [Source: Stephen Ambrose, "Undaunted Courage"]
Undaunted Courage was a great read. A couple of months later I was in St Louis standing on the banks of the Mississippi imaging how the Lewis & Clark party was able to row up the Mississippi.
Actually, the Missouri. They did a bit of everything - paddle, sails, ropes and pulleys, portaging (like around Great Falls, which required building “trailers” with wooden wheels). I just finished re-reading the L & C journals, and Undaunted Courage is great background material - I didn’t realize that Jefferson and Lewis had the plan set to go before the possibility of the Louisiana Purchase was even dreamed of - Jefferson was just trying to acquire New Orleans, but Napoleon knew that it was the Americans who would eventually explore and discover the West anyway, so he figured he could use the dough and that a side benefit was that it would put the U.S. in conflict with Britain, which had already made a trans-Canada crossing (MacKenzie), and which conflict could be useful to Napoleon.
–
Q: Why was Bernanke, a student of, or an “expert” on, the Great Depression, brought in in August 2002?
Jas
I sense the answer is in some sort of conspiracy theory?
–
“I sense the answer is in some sort of conspiracy theory?”
You sense wrong. The question was a rhetorical one with the underlying premise that some smart people in power must have figured out that a depression was soon going to be at hand. No?
This is not a conspiracy. That is how the system really works.
Jas
No offense meant. In that case, yeah, some smart people in power probably think a depression is at hand.
Back in 2002 it looked as though there was serious deflation at hand, then it was interrupted by a false economic boom due to real estate.
I recall you mentioned a year or two back that you are mainly in cash (T-bills). So based on your several-years-long assumption that a depression is being battled by the Fed, do you think you will be better off with T-bills or better off if you bought gold at $450 per ounce in 2004?
Gold is good to have when the Fed is battling a depression. They are furiously trying to inflate the currency. When the logjam that prevents easy credit is removed, Mr. inflation will be back and gold currency will be better than T-bills.
+1
All good posts, Jas. Thank you for your insights.
…Because Sir Greenisspent was getting married to Andrea Mitchell and the FED anticipated that when his new bride stuck her tongue in his ear…he’d be suffering from years of “Irrational Exuberance” and that they didn’t want to be left hangin’ in a “conundrum” as to his “innovative” behavior?
I looked at 3 houses today. The one I really wanted to see is off the market as of today (of course it is!). The other 3 were total crap. If this blog doesn’t cure ya’ of wanting to buy a house, actually going to look at some houses will. I cannot imagine buying someone else’s piece of garbage. It’s amazing to me how some people live. One of the homes was a total pit - but with 2 GIANT, brand new, flat panel TVs. Ah, priorities in America.
“but with 2 GIANT, brand new, flat panel TVs.”
Were they on either side of the fireplace, nicely framing it? I about messed myself when I heard about a decorating scheme like that in the Hamptons.
Residence in the Hamptons only occurs during the summer, thus fireplaces are unneeded. However, their existence raises the value of the property and helps the house constantly appreciate throughout the entire 12-month cycle. If this doesn’t make any sense, please contact a Realtor™ for further explanation.
“Ah, priorities in America.”
Yep. The gal next to me divorced her hubby and has now moved out and given the house back to the bank, but during all that it didn’t keep her from buying and driving off in a brand new Mustang convertible.
Come on Blano,
You only live once
Yeah, I’d get jiggy with her, and get use of the Mustang for free.
You only live once.
I wouldn’t dare go anywhere near her….she was nasty. I’d rather walk.
I’m sure SanFranGal is much better……
Maybe you can get jiggy with the Mustang then.
Wow. Here’a an opportunity -
In a recession, executives make quick getaways.
At evasive-driving school, business is up, but some question need for such tactics.
Snip
“In bad economic times, crime rates go up,” he said. “The downside to that is nobody has money for training; the upside to it is everybody needs to train. Those companies that still have money have been coming through the doors, because they feel there’s increased crime.”
As millions of people have lost their jobs or sizable chunks of their retirement savings, some corporate titans are increasingly worried that angry customers or former workers might try to do them physical harm, Ricci said.
“I don’t want to get into specific stories, but I am hearing, ‘We’re worried about our security, because in these times you have to be,’ ” he said.
Full article
http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2008/12/29/in_a_recession_executives_make_quick_getaways/?page=1
Leigh
I’m all for learning defensive driving techniques and being ready for the unexpected on the road, the idea of someone like Angelo Mozilo tearing away from would-be attackers “Italian Job”-style is just laughable.
Of course, he’d be easy to spot in the dark anyways.
Palmetto, Thank You So Very Much for taking the time to write and explain. It shows you are a good person, and it means a lot to me not to buy in Cape Coral if it will sink me.
My spelling is better this time, because I didn’t think anyone would respond. I am grateful.
Also, I didn’t know anything about the “Chinese Drywall Issue” for example, or the employment prospects.
If I ever get down there, I owe you a dinner. Again, Thank You!
Greg
ATE, thank you for thanking me! But remember, it’s just my opinion. Driving to Tampa or even the outer reaches of Tampa for work is still possible from NPR or Spring Hill. Not the greatest, but doable. In Cape Coral, there’s no place to go. Naples, Ft. Myers, which are not big job markets.
Catskill Home Prices: How Low Will They Go?
Didn’t Barbara Corcoran say things would pick up after the Superbowl (the 2006 Superbowl if I recall correctly?)
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/02/greathomesanddestinations/02catskills.html
“The owner of a house on a pond in Andes recently lowered the price to $299,000 from $329,000, said Ms. McArdle, who is listing it. She said she had seen “some reductions more drastic than that, but in those cases the original asking prices were inflated to begin with.”
Having sold real estate in Andes for 30 years, Ms. McArdle said she remained “optimistic about the market.
“Right now, people are scared. We need to get through the inauguration, through the winter. At the end of March, the beginning of April, we’ll see an increase in activity.”……
It gets better!!!
““Everyone asks, ‘Are we at the bottom?’ ” Mr. Florke said. His answer: “I don’t know, but there are some great deals out there.”
Indeed, he said, “this may become one of those periods that people look back on with nostalgia, talking about the bargains they were able to pick up.”
Ha! Ha ha ha ha!
Sure! I need another albatross around my neck a hundred miles away! Another electric bill, outrageous property tax bill, maintenance and upkeep! It’s a lifestyle decision, you know!
In todays episode of burning books of money, the infamous US hedge fund priest Bernie Madoff (playing the part of Girolamo Savonarola) has taken down the Bank of Medici in Austria…
Clergymen close to the situation are now building the pyre on which Mr. Bernie “Savonarola” Madoff will be burned alive near the Piazza de’ Wall Street.
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/01/03/bernard.madoff.austria.bank/index.html?iref=mpstoryview
They don’t have any “liquidity problems” though. That’s why the government is intervening.
BWAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!
My tin foil hat theory was that the government was using Madoff as an excuse to take it over.
Requires too much forward “thinking” on the part of governments.
They have liquidity problems (= bankrupt.)
Short, sweet, to the point and Occam would approve.
“Short, sweet, to the point and Occam would approve.”
There isn’t a day that goes by that you guys don’t send me off to Wikipedia for some reason or another.
In the US, Pope Paulson and Cardinal Bernanke would gladly leave a TIP for one of the flock under such duress…. short the US Financials at your own risk of everlasting damnation.
In 2008, I made out like a bandit shorting the financials.
2009 might be different. Now, the game has moved to shorting the smaller regional banks.
thats classic:
Ive been dying to share my two best: DSL-long, three days doubled the money, WM-long, same story…hat tip Hozzie.
We need more laws! Laws with incarceration terms, none of this girly-men texting while driving laws! Your taxpayer with benefits & pension after x1term law-makers…get busy!
Therefore, we can build more prisons ( Think construction jobs) …hire more $75,000+ security guards (think laid-off Homeland Security shoe checkers)… hire more low paid q-tip medical technicians (he has wax in his brain)…
“Reinke is trying to reduce prisoners housed outside Idaho under costly contracts with private prison companies in order to meet Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter’s order that agencies slash their 2009 budgets by 4 percent and 2010 budgets by up to 10 percent.”
Disgruntled slackers!:
“Reinke said he wasn’t certain what started the fracas — investigators were reviewing security videotapes — but it’s possible the prisoners were unhappy with their new quarters.”
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090103/ap_on_re_us/idaho_prison_disturbance
They should all be re-educated in solitary for a month or so. Then they might be a little more appreciative.
Reinke is trying to reduce prisoners housed outside Idaho under costly contracts with private prison companies in order to meet Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter’s order that agencies slash their 2009 budgets by 4 percent and 2010 budgets by up to 10 percent.
————————-
Can someone please explain why private prisons are more expensive than the govt-owned (runs counter to the claims that private entities are always less expensive); and if private prisons are more expensive, why were the prisoners sent there in the first place?
Dear Muir:
Thank you too so much for your help. Your thoughts re “75 sq. ft” makes a lot of sense. I continue to be impressed by both the wisdom and humanity of this board.
Grateful, I am,
Greg
Bob Brinker on the radio, I haven’t heard that guy since I left CA 2.5 years ago.
So this is what he said “CA too big to fail so don’t sell CA muni’s
TIPS should yeild 2.2% which is a good deal as 10 year Treasuries are yeilding 2.4%.
GNMAS one of the best preformers in 2008
We are currently in Deflation but a few years from now with the FED handing out money? ”
Thats all I remember I was driving back to Phoenix from Payson where I saw many homes for sale or rent, By the airport.
Like I said haven’t heard brinker since CA where he said RE won’t crash and stocks won’t crash, I remember I was in Ventura CA getting a peets coffee and figured Brinker was a one hit wonder having forcast the dot bomb crash but not seeing the RE bubble.
There used to be a big sign next to the freeway in Oxnard that said ” buy AZ homes” haha I bet that sign is long gone.
Yeah, last year most of us said the 5 investment banks would fail.
They were too big too. Now there are none.
I see only downside in long-term CA munis. NY, NJ, PA, IL as well.
There will be a time to repurchase munis. Now is not that time.
Bobby sure missed a sell it all call in aught 8. I think most of the disciples have excomunicated that particular savior.
Brinker’s last five “all in” buy levels:
March 2007 Special Subscriber Bulletin @ 1380
Aug 16, 2007 @ 1411: Mid 1400s
Feb 10, 2008 @ 1331: Low 1300s
Aug 5, 2008 @ 1285: 1240 or less
Sept 2, 2008 @ 1282: Low-to-mid 1200s
Brinker can hook up with Ben Stein and Cramer they can all figure it out , forcasting as bad as realtors
VATICAN CITY (AFP) – The contraceptive pill is polluting the environment and is in part responsible for male infertility, a report in the Vatican newspaper L’Osservatore Romano said Saturday.
The pill “has for some years had devastating effects on the environment by releasing tonnes of hormones into nature” through female urine, said Pedro Jose Maria Simon Castellvi, president of the International Federation of Catholic Medical Associations, in the report.
“We have sufficient evidence to state that a non-negligible cause of male infertility in the West is the environmental pollution caused by the pill,” he said, without elaborating further.
“We are faced with a clear anti-environmental effect which demands more explanation on the part of the manufacturers,” added Castellvi.
The article was promptly dismissed by several organisations.
“Once metabolised, the hormones contained in oral contraceptives no longer have any of the characteristic effects of feminine hormones,” said Gianbenedetto Melis, vice-president of a contraceptive research association, quoted by the ANSA news agency.
The hormones contained in the pill such as oestrogen “are present everywhere… in plastic, in disinfectants, in meat that we eat,” added Flavia Franconi, of the Society of Italian Pharmacology.
Is there any doubt that if religion controlled gov we would end up in with another dark ages?
It’s bad enough that government controls us already!
Thanks for the hard landing.