January 18, 2009

Bits Bucket For January 18, 2009

Please visit the HBB Forum. Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

320 Comments »

Comment by Lesser Fool
2009-01-18 01:51:15

HBBers, I would like your opinions on my family situation. My mother-in-law, a widow, lives in an 18-year-old condo building in Newark, CA. She paid $115k for her 1BR unit 10 years ago. After having read this blog for a year we practically begged her to sell in 2006 upon hearing that 1BR units in her complex were selling for 300k+. She refused, mainly due to everybody around her BUT us convincing her that RE was only going to go up. I even asked her at the time what she would do if her house subsequently lost half its value, and she told me with a smug look that that would never happen.

We recently heard that the exact same floorplan was sold in a foreclosure sale for 165k a few months ago. My wife and I are naturally very upset because we feel responsible for the well-being of our parents and now are faced with a much harder decision than we were 2+ years ago. The damn thing would have flown off the shelf at 300k and all tax-free to boot, *grumble*.

Recently there was a maintenance issue with the unit that has caused us all considerable grief and allowed us to bring up the option of selling again. This time, ironically, she is more amenable to the idea.

My mil’s RE agent is telling her to wait until March to list because she might get a better price and because there will be “more buyers” (she thinks the unit will fetch 177k max (and probably closer to 165k) if it is put on the market right now). My view, of course, is the standard HBB formula of listing it immediately a tad below the lowest comp. I just don’t see how values can increase from here in the near- to mid-term.

The agent is really good; when we backed out of an offer we made with her on a house (which got accepted) in 2006 (after many hours spent showing houses) she totally supported our decision. As an aside, that house according to zillow has lost 160k since that time.

What is the best option here? The unit is close to 800 sqft in size.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-01-18 08:19:07

Where would your MIL go if she sold? Compared to what she’s paying now, what would it cost her to live there? What would be the REAL, TOTAL cost of that move? Is your MIL happy where she is?

Comment by Lesser Fool
2009-01-18 09:37:41

Where would your MIL go if she sold?

- she would rent in the same area, perhaps buying another place later if house values drop significantly.

Compared to what she’s paying now, what would it cost her to live there?

- new cost would be estimated rent minus after-tax income on house sale proceeds = 1000 - 340 = $660/mo. Current cost is HOA+prop.tax+maintenance, which comes to about 270+85+150 = $505/mo after tax refund. Assumed that she could sell the place for $160k at 5% commission, and would invest the entire principal in a safe investment yielding 3%.

What would be the REAL, TOTAL cost of that move? Is your MIL happy where she is?

- cost of the move would be a few hundred dollars at most. My MIL was happy until the recent maintenance issues, which made her realize that the building she lives in is getting on in years and that the problems are only going to get worse. Also, the HOA has modified the CC&Rs over the years to absolve itself of any responsibility for maintenance of plumbing (which was the issue this time).

 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-01-18 08:54:23

she was reluctant to sell when prices were rising and reluctant to sell now that prices are falling.. Sounds like she’s happy where she is.
It sounds like this is her home, as opposed to an investment.
I’d drop it if i were you.

 
Comment by scdave
2009-01-18 09:25:56

If you decide to sell put the unit on the market now…Who knows how long these low interest rates will last and what inventory levels may look like in three or four months…

 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-01-18 09:26:00

Have to agree with Bill. Where would your MIL go? If she moved in with someone else then it might be a good idea. If she moved into another condo it would in essence be a lateral move. Again, facing a depreciating asset + the RE agent fees and moving costs. Another condo in better shape might make sense if it appears the current unit will be in need of considerable ongoing out of pocket costs for maintenance.

 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-01-18 10:39:49

What’s the incentive to sell now?! This is a terrible selling environment. She bought this place 10 years ago. Unless she is terribly unhappy with her current situation or wants to move closer to family or something, I’d leave her alone.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-01-18 10:55:23

There you have your answer Lesser:

You MIL is old and not open to new ideas. Just let her be, and figure she will live poorly the rest of her life.

My mom is 70 and she knows better..because she listens to her kids.

———————————————–
My mother-in-law, a widow, lives in an 18-year-old condo building in Newark, CA. She paid $115k for her 1BR unit 10 years ago. After having read this blog

Comment by Lesser Fool
2009-01-18 11:43:46

Thanks all for the insightful comments. The general sense I’m getting is that unless she is in a really bad situ she should just stay put. My initial thinking was that she should just sell asap and rent, but the numbers don’t work as well as they did 2 years ago :(. Also we did some research and we cannot find a comparable rental for less than $1300/mo so she would be going down in lifestyle. She is 70 but quite active.

My wife and I came up with another plan; put 10k of our own money into a Roth IRA for my mil, written with us as the sole beneficiaries, and invest it aggressively against the housing market, skimming off any profits to supplement my mil’s income. If we are wrong then the price of her house should go up and she might be able to sell at that point. If we are right I could get 100%+ annual returns on that money, based on my track record in my own Roth for the past 2 years. Does this sound reasonable?

Another question: does my mil qualify for a Roth if the only income she has is from some fixed-income investments? Ie, she doesn’t have a job. Her AGI is well below the limit for Roth contributions.

I really appreciate all the collective wisdom on this board. You guys are fantastic! It’s really great to be able to get unbiased third-party opinions like this. I hope to join the next HBB gathering in the SF Bay Area and am wondering when it will be.

Comment by polly
2009-01-18 12:12:42

Roth IRAs are limited to the lesser of $5000 per year for people over 50 or the person’s taxable compensation.

Go to http://www.irs.gov and poke around until you find Publication 590 (Roth info starts around page 60).

What is the big deal with getting more money for her? Is she having trouble paying for her expenses based on what she has now? If there is any chance she will need to go into a nursing home, most states require you become bankrupt before they will help with the expenses, so unless you are truely well off, it can be a negative to put a lot of new assets in the name of an older person.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Eudemon
2009-01-18 17:57:53

No. She is NOT eligible for a Roth IRA. Only those with earned income can put money in a Roth. She cannot use distributions/dividends from fixed investments to open a Roth as they are not earnings.

If you or your wife have money in YOUR Roth, you can withdraw an contributions (and contributions only - not dividends or gains) tax free whenever you want. You do not have to be 59-1/2 to withdraw c-o-n-t-r-i-b-u-t-i-o-n-s from a Roth tax- or penalty-free.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 11:52:21

“I even asked her at the time what she would do if her house subsequently lost half its value, and she told me with a smug look that that would never happen.”

Everyone in the world was a real estate expert back in 2006, weren’t they?

 
Comment by hd74man
2009-01-18 15:58:20

RE: the exact same floorplan was sold in a foreclosure sale for 165k a few months ago.

First, get your own independant property appraisal from a reliable individual. Check your Yellow Pages for somebody associated with the Appraisal Institute. Be sure you don’t get somebody’s trainee flunky. Ask for qualifications.

Tell the appraiser you want an expounded narrative on marketing conditions. See what a “pro” says about the future.

Don’t rely on “freebie” opinions from broker’s out to solicit a listing or some other “I’ll save myself $350.00″ “get it for free” information source. The failure may cost you big $$$.

Technically, foreclosure’s do not meet the litmus test of an “arms length transaction, involved in the definition of “fair market value and should not be used as primary comparables in a FNMA conforming report.

If they add support in a narrative addendum or are the only indicators of market activity then so be it. But your report should contain 3 solid sales representing a TYPICAL transaction with no undue influences.

But don’t scrim on what you need for your valuation derivation for which all things must follow.

Personally, I don’t know how you could live cheaper than a $115k initial acquisition price, although crap construction or crummy HOA who don’t keep up on maintenance and depreciation are always the wild card.

Comment by SaladSD
2009-01-18 17:12:47

Agree with all the previous posters. It also seems, IMHO, that you are needlessly agonizing over the tidy profit your MIL could have pocketed if she’d tagged some FB with the inflated prices sellers were fetching 2 years ago. My husband and I knew prices were crazy stupid 2 years ago in our neighborhood, and could have made a quick $130 K more than the “value” today, but stayed put. Why? Inertia-we like our neighborhood, this is home. Life is too short to make everything a P/L equation.

Comment by CA renter
2009-01-19 03:56:27

Agree with the above.

It doesn’t sound like her situation would be greatly improved if she were to sell.

If you plan to keep her in your own home (assuming you have extra room and are sure everyone would get along, long-term), then the situation might warrant a sale.

I would NOT sell this condo and make her rent or buy an equivalent place.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by SDGreg
2009-01-18 02:08:13

Film, Porn Shoots Sought by Los Angeles Homeowners Hit by Slump

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aYRTVXV1dnuE&refer=home

“Cosmetic changes are often required. Another client “almost had a heart attack” when he saw his living room had been painted DayGlo yellow, she said.”

“His four-bedroom house in suburban Burbank, which Mendoza built in 2006, didn’t sell for the $1.3 million he asked, and when renters left in November he began leasing it for filming. The most he received for a day was $1,300, he said. So he posted an Internet notice that the property, which has an eight-person hot tub, was available to the adult-film industry, which he had heard pays as much as $5,000 a day.”

A few months ago, “I probably would’ve said, ‘You want to do what in here?’” he said. “That’s reserved for me and the missus.”

 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-01-18 03:14:56

ET Chicago,

Sorry to hear about the job in yesterday’s bits. Too bad it’s not May, but you’ll make the best of it I’m sure. Sounds like you made good preparations.

My BIL might have lost his when MOT cut 4k more the other day, I’m afraid to ask my sis, but that’s all he could talk about at Christmas.

It’s getting closer.

Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-01-18 10:15:38

Thanks, Edgewater.

Yeah, I’m much better prepared than most people, even with a baby in tow.

I feel relatively fortunate.

(I also neglected to mention yesterday that my line of work is very freelance-friendly. And that I’m a cheapskate … two more things in the plus column.)

Comment by CA renter
2009-01-19 03:59:22

Also wanted to say sorry about your job loss, ET.

If your situation is pretty stable, there’s nothing wrong with being a SAHD (stay-at-home dad). You might find that a second income really doesn’t bring in all that much extra money, especially when day care, auto expenses, clothing expenses, extra “eating out” expenses, taxes, etc. are taken into consideration.

Best of luck to you!

 
 
 
Comment by Gatorfan
2009-01-18 03:57:10

My family and I just moved back to South Florida (West Broward). We’re living in corporate housing while we look for a SFH to rent — we’re looking to pay around $2,000 a month.

Because of the mess down here, I won’t even look at a house until I check the public records on the home through the Broward County Clerk’s website. It’s amazing what I have been seeing.

At least two-thirds of the homes I see listed on Craigslist or on the MLS would see significant negative cash flow at the rental prices they’re offering — I’m talking $1,000 monthly losses or more. We’re simply not willing to take a risk on those homes.

Many of those listed already have received a foreclosure lis pendens. When I have seen this, I email the listing Realtor® who always explains that they had no idea (of course, they didn’t bother to check either). And, thus far, I have not seen one de-listed after I notified the Realtor®.

I think we’re going to be flooded by stories of first-last-and-security scams, where scumbag “landlords” take deposits and disappear while they allow their albatrosses to go into foreclosure. Hopefully, legistlators will do something about this practice shortly.

The few homes thar both reasonablly-price and cashflow-positive (or near breaking even) that we’ve looked at have a universal story. The owner would really prefer to sell. However, because of the market, the landlord have decided to rent out their homes for a couple of years until the market recovers. Of course, they’re living in the new homes they’ve already purchase.

Under the circumstances, it’s amazing that there are so many people out there that really believe that the market will “recover” in two years. Perhaps it will hit bottom, but it’s clearly not going to recover. It’s also amazing that so many people buy new homes before they sell their old one, especially in this environment. People’s clueless is endless.

Comment by aNYCdj
2009-01-18 14:15:59

I guess the banks are going to become “accidental landlords” real fast

At least with rent coming in and the house kept up…its far better then the alternative.

————————————————–
I think we’re going to be flooded by stories of first-last-and-security scams, where scumbag “landlords” take deposits and disappear while they allow their albatrosses to go into foreclosure. Hopefully, legistlators will do something about this practice shortly.

 
 
Comment by Frankie
2009-01-18 05:16:07

Not so much basking in De Nile as wallowing in it in the UK

Housing minister Margaret Beckett has claimed there are signs of an “upturn” in the property market, despite record price falls.

In an interview with The Sunday Times, she even expressed concern about the dangers of a new inflationary bubble in house prices once the economy picks up again and mortgage lending resumes.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5go9SK_O9LcL0i_c5blmZTEoORNZg

Other sage advice from the minister

Beckett tells first-time buyers: don’t delay

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5537031.ece

 
Comment by WT Economist
2009-01-18 05:16:09

Three months into the housing bust in NYC, the NY Times says brave people think it’s a great time to buy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/18/realestate/18cov.html

“Many of these buyers have never received a fat bonus check, so they don’t miss it now. They did not suffer huge stock market losses, because they didn’t have huge stock market investments. They aren’t mourning the loss of value in their existing co-ops or condos, because they have never owned one.”

“They have jobs and good credit ratings, and they are looking to buy.”

“And now, brokers say, these mostly first-time homeowners are taking advantage of reduced apartment prices and interest rates that have fallen to the lowest levels in a generation. They’re making deals — sometimes far below asking price — on apartments marketed for under $1 million, and especially under $500,000.”

How long is a generation anyway? I don’t think the lowest prices in a generation can yet be had. Not even close

Comment by Man on Long Island
2009-01-18 08:35:01

I will tell you this. I bought a 750 sq ft 1 bedroom pre-war apartment (quite nice, not doorman) on Upper West Side in late 1997 which I sold in 2001 as my wife really did not love city (hence alas I moved to Long Island, where it is not only overpriced but unpleasant on south shore of Nassau county — traffic city, airplane noise, etc….). Anyway,I paid 150K for the apartment (after agonizing about it!) and sold it for $362k. Of course, Long Island had already moved up in tandem so I did make some money but not much as the money rolled into a new, modest house on Long Island that waws already started to become overpriced.

Recently saw an apartment in same building as where I used to live asking 650k. (There is no MLS in NY but recently saw some web site that shows listings from others, don’t remember the name). It could drop 40% and I’d still question it. Don’t know where NY will go but “cheapest in a generation”? Hardly.

FYI the building was 321 w. 90th street — the outside was used on Seinfeld for shots of George’s apartment I found out. I miss living in the city. But while Long Island has gone up, the city is still relatively higher. I feel priced out even if I did want to move back. (same with fancier areas on long island. I will not “move up” in this environment).

 
Comment by polly
2009-01-18 09:07:32

NYC does have an ample supply of potential knife catchers because of the number of people who have never done anything but rent. Not sure where they are getting their downpayments, but so it goes…

Comment by evildoc
2009-01-18 13:04:15

Mark is that you?

-david

Comment by evildoc
2009-01-18 13:06:26

Meant to address “Mark is that you ” to man in long island. sorry ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by WHYoung
2009-01-18 16:53:36

And NYC has a a lot of people who think it makes sense to pay two or three thousand dollars a month to live in a glorified dorm room (i.e. a studio apartment) and think that a similar outlay after taxes makes sense…with the whole building equity train of thought, etc.

Forgetting of course you have to have the income to take the tax deductions from… and how much expenses that never go away (the way a mortgage potentially could) taxes, insurance and maintainance have gone up in recent years…

 
 
Comment by polly
2009-01-18 09:55:17

I’m not sure why, but I think people usually refer to a generation as being about 20 years. Maybe it is a Biblical thing?

Comment by skroodle
2009-01-18 10:35:11

A generation is usuallly the time between a mother’s first offspring and her daughter’s first offspring.

They are probably talking about a cultural generation(people shaped by the same events and trends), which might be as low as 10 years now.

 
 
Comment by Eudemon
2009-01-18 18:04:57

As if by magic, WT, here comes an HBB’er with an answer…

A generation is 23 years long. Members of your generation are people that range from being 11.5 years older than you to those aged 11.5 years younger than you.

 
 
Comment by Frankie
2009-01-18 05:21:08

This comment sums up the Housing Bubble, from the comment section of the following times article.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5537245.ece

I am an estate agent, and for thousands of us, we need the market to go up again to make a good living. I also have lots of friends who are massively invested in the property market and they all need that market to rise again to be able to make the books balance.The only possible way is up!!

A triumph of hope over experience.

Comment by crazy frog
2009-01-18 09:48:52

“The only possible way is up!!”
——————————————–
Sounds to me like “Failure is not an option!”

Remember this slogan from the early days of the Iraq fiasco? Like the reality on the ground cares what your options are.

 
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2009-01-18 11:58:24

Loved this comment:

“Let me get this straight. Taxpayers (me) are having to pay billions to keep insolvent reckless banks afloat that lent too much money too cheaply so that they can then start to lend again at rock bottom prices to keep a bubble afloat which effectively keeps me and my family out of the housing market.

Fiona, Crediton, UK”

Fiona - will you consider it a compliment if I steal your comment for my letters to my own elected representatives? :D

Comment by bulwark
2009-01-18 21:21:07

And these are the same reckless banks that cheat you out of interest on your savings and charge you for holding their money. Let them fail and let the Feds loan us money directly.

 
 
 
Comment by Darrell in PHX
2009-01-18 05:52:21

Yesterday MarketMaven said:
“[T]rying to stimulate the economy without fixing the trade deficit is like trying to pump up a tire without fixing the leak…. THE STIMULUS PACKAGE WON’T WORK UNLESS TRADE IS BROUGHT TOWARD BALANCE AT THE SAME TIME!”

ABSOLUTELY!!!!

The only way we can run a trade deficit without adjustments to the exchange rate is to go further and further into debt.

Yesterday our local paper ran an article with investment advice. #1 save more. Spend less than you make. The rest of his advice was the typical stock broker drival.

My comment:
Comment #1 about saving dooms our economy. We’ve been spending 110% of our income. We buy from China and then they lend the money back to us. Now our debt load is so huge, most can’t make the payments without the ability to constantly roll over the debt.

If we slow our spending to, say, 90% of our income to make room for savings, that is a 20% decline in consumer spending, which will feedback into unemployment, which will feed back into more reductions in spending….

Oh, wait… Don’t need to talk if’s. It is already happening.

Savings are for nations with a trade surplus. Nations with a trade deficit have to have a negative savings rate, so that they can reabsorb the trade deficit as debt to prevent exchange rates from adjusting. OF course, long term the nation with a net negative trade deficit is doomed to financial trouble as the debt gets too big, then collapses. Oh, again, don’t need to talk theoretical, since that too is happening right here, right now.

Comment by combotechie
2009-01-18 06:05:07

“Now our debt load is so huge, most can’t make the payments without the ability to constantly roll over the debts.”

“.. our debt load is so huge…”

The solution lies in the mass destruction of this debt. Trillions of dollars are destined to disappear before stability is reached. If your dollars are among these disappearing trillions then you are screwed. If your dollars survive this mass destruction then you get to reap the benifits of the scaracity of dollars and get to buy things on the cheap.

Hence debt sucks and cash is king.

 
Comment by LongIslandLost
2009-01-18 06:09:58

Wait a minute. The game is not so easy for creditor nations.

If the US consumer cuts spending, are they going to stop buying cheap plastic trinkets or medical services first? They will stop buying cheap plastic trinkets. Much of the reduced spending will hurt employment in the creditor nations.

And, if the the US defaults, then that means all of the hard work in the creditor nations is worthless. Imagine the repurcussions in China if the US defaulted or hyperinflated. All of their dollar reserves would be worthless.

Comment by doug r
2009-01-18 10:08:30

If the Chinese hadn’t kept the Yuan artificially low, it would have naturally risen with their mass of exports. If they invested their money in China instead of lending it to us, they could have built more infrastructure.
A higher Yuan would mean their products would naturally go up in price, putting a damper on sales while their real wages go up, meaning they could buy more stuff from us.
Maybe the Chinese won the cold war after all…

 
Comment by Bub Diddley
2009-01-18 10:41:28

I know plenty of people with no medical insurance but plenty of cheap plastic trinkets…

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-01-18 06:45:10

I think we should discuss this weekend what kind of jobs/job skills will be in some demand in the next few years?

Or are we just going to have to buckle down and teach ourselves sales and marketing skills even if we are not good at it ……and go from one short term gig to another short term gig…forever?

——————————————————-
which will feedback into unemployment

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-01-18 09:57:18

Entertainment (movies, sports) and the support system for entertainment is a big industry. From the stars themselves to cameramen, grips, props, and so on.

Dentists, doctors, physical therapists.

Attorneys.

Finanncial advisors - yes still important. People still seek advice on how to save, even if they have very little to save these days.

information security.

Infrastructure (now with Obama, road repairs, new transportation systems such as electric trains).

Bed and breakfast places (bad economy forces people to stay in the U.S. within a day trip from home).

Booze industry. Vices are recession proof.

Farming. Ya gotta eat.

Teaching, socialist workers (I mean social workers), and all the bureaucrap jobs that will mushroom under a massive socialist government jobs program. I have no objection to anyone joining one of those job programs and would do the same if I had to. When government owns most of the economy (banks and so on) and you have no choice but to be a government employee, you have to do so or starve. Still I’m a raving liberal capitalst and will always promote capitalism as the quickest way to a high standard of living and innovation.

All is not doom and gloom. The pendulum has swung to drab gray big government, but at least you will be eating.

Comment by In Montana
2009-01-18 11:53:45

Bed and breakfast places

seems kind bobo-ish. What’s wrong with the many motels built during the boom?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2009-01-19 11:20:05

bnb’s are doomed. many paid too much for the prop.

my wife has a rather delusional preferance for bnbs. she thinks if we stay in one she will ‘get some’ as opposed to staying in a motel. so far this has not happened (maybe in no small part because I find staying in bnbs… creepy?) but she keeps hoping.

 
 
Comment by Lionel
2009-01-18 14:04:28

“Entertainment (movies, sports) and the support system for entertainment is a big industry. From the stars themselves to cameramen, grips, props, and so on.”

I have to disagree with this one. Everyone I know (except for a commercial casting agent) is taking a giant hit right now in entertainment, unless… you happen to be in reality TV. I have a friend who makes a killing shooting commercials who has been feeling it for over a year. Topnotch company. Same with another friend who’s a feature director who augments his income shooting commercials. He used to make fun of me as the guy with the sandwich board, now, not so much joking. People don’t talk about it much, but it’s the commercial industry keeps everyone afloat in Hollywood, outside of writers. And writers are taking massive hits from reality TV. Leno moving down an hour probably took out 500 or so well-paying jobs. A guy I know who was a high-flying exec at a top production company recently asked my buddy’s wife (who is wardrobe on a reality show) if he could get PA work. That’s going from 250K/year to $18/hr. Good luck with that. He “downsized” from his $3300 apartment to a $2400 one. I could go on and on with the anecdotes, but the idea that, because Hollywood survived the Great Depression, it somehow is going to flourish now is obscenely wrong. The cross-platforming, multidimensional nature of Hollywood (look who owns the studios, e.g., Sony and Columbia) means that it will retrench in a huge way. Where the heck are the networks going to derive their fat checks from? GM? Ford? This sucker’s going down.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2009-01-19 04:08:44

I’ve been hearing the exact same thing from my friends in the entertainment industry (in L.A.). It’s dead.

 
 
 
 
Comment by denquiry
2009-01-18 07:44:00

OF course, long term the nation with a net negative trade deficit is doomed to financial trouble as the debt gets too big, then collapses. Oh, again, don’t need to talk theoretical, since that too is happening right here, right now.
—————————————————————————-
Didn’t dickie cheney say “Deficits don’t matter”? Also, did our recent great decider that the “Economy is fundamentally strong”?

I am so confused. I thought our elected leaders had the best interests of the USA and her people at heart.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-01-18 08:28:29

Dickey did indeed say that. And Barry O. agrees with him.

Comment by WAman
2009-01-18 08:55:12

You evidently don’t watch the Newshour on PBS. If you did you would have heard about the meeting Obama had with conservatives the other day where he told them he is very concerned about the deficit. This has also been in other national news.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by denquiry
2009-01-18 09:04:10

BO….how do we get out of this without stinking?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by polly
2009-01-18 09:12:21

There is a difference between thinking it doesn’t matter and thinking it is less bad than the alternative (no stimulous, let the market sort it out unaided). He maybe wrong about which would be worse long term, but that is different than not caring about deficits at all.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-01-18 13:09:08

Wow, BO has really pulled the wool over your eyes. He’s using the opportunity of “years of trillion dollar defecits” to push through everything on his agenda. Wake up people!

 
Comment by measton
2009-01-18 13:19:45

Bill he hasn’t even become president yet.

Take a sedative.

 
Comment by BanteringBear
2009-01-18 16:28:20

“Bill he hasn’t even become president yet.

Take a sedative.”

Exactly- and don’t forget the prune juice.

 
Comment by polly
2009-01-18 17:15:05

Eh, let him be. I called him out on his personl crud yesterday. I expected some sort of attack.

And the idea that I am some naive little thing is almost laughable. I guess my years as an attorney on Wall Street and for a multinational corporation, in the media, and, most recently, in the executive branch participating in regulatory decisions, staffing special projects, attending hearings and responding to congressional inquiries means I have no idea how government works. Yeah, right.

 
 
 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-01-18 08:08:24

searching Google/news/ trade deficit..

US Economy: Trade Deficit Narrows Most in 12 Years
Bloomberg - Jan 13, 2009
13 (Bloomberg) — The US trade deficit narrowed in November by the most in 12 years as tumbling oil prices and slumping consumer spending cut imports. …

Export drop pushes Nov. euro-zone trade balance into deficit
MarketWatch - Jan 16, 2009
By William L. Watts LONDON (MarketWatch) — The then-15 nation euro zone swung to a 7 billion euro external trade deficit in November from a 2.3 billion …

Can those headlines mean there are more factors than meet the eye?

Comment by MightyMike
2009-01-18 11:25:42

The improvement in our trade deficit occurred because we are currently spending a lot less on imports than last year. There are two reasons for that.

1) A big portion of what we import is oil and the price of oil has dropped a lot this year. The price of oil has dropped because most is the world is either in a recession or close to it.

2) We’re also importing fewer manufactrued goods, like HD televisions. This is also because we’re in a recession and can’t afford a lot of things that we could afford in the past.

So the fall in the trade deficit could be a seen as a silver lining in the cloud that is the recession. Or it could be seen as sign of big and mencing that cloud is.

Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-01-18 12:05:06

there ya go..
Evidently our foreign oil dependancy is a a rather large determining factor in the trade deficit. And when credit gets tight, the deficit shrinks. That’s two hidden factors. There might be more.

Seems almost like the trade deficit number is little more than another comparative economic indicator.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by MightyMike
2009-01-18 14:37:25

That’s a typo; I meant to write “Or it could be seen as sign of how big and menacing that cloud is.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-01-18 08:40:16

Allen Sinai, president of Decision Economics, a Boston-area financial consulting firm, said that even with Obama’s aggressive spending program, the economy seems unlikely to show a true recovery this year in terms of sustainable gains by consumers and businesses.

“There are forces going on that are 1930s-like,” Sinai said. “There is incredible asset deflation, a huge loss in wealth by households. In the ’30s, even when funds became available from the financial system to borrow, the pessimism by consumers and businesses was so great that no one wanted to spend.” Sinai wouldn’t rule out a repeat of that mind-set.

Some economists who are not fans of Keynesian economics or stimulus packages argue that FDR’s vaunted New Deal programs, highly touted today as a model for job creation, did little to spur a U.S. recovery.

“It was finally World War II that finally ended the Great Depression,” said Bruce Bartlett, a White House economist in the Reagan administration and a top Treasury official in the first Bush administration. Bartlett is author of a study showing that nearly all postwar stimulus packages passed by Congress came too late to be of much help, and just increased the deficit and fueled inflation.

Obama shrugs off expressions of skepticism and casts his stimulus package as the right formula for creating long-lasting, well-paying jobs, despite its big cost.

biz.yahoo.com/ap/090118/stimulus_risks.html

Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-01-18 08:47:07

Apologies - was attempting to only bold out the quote above. Any hints would be greatly appreciated for turning off bold. I tried less than b greater than, however that didn’t appear to turn it off.

Comment by bluprint
2009-01-18 09:19:30

For most html tags, you add a / character to the tag to make it close.

<b>This is bold</b> This won’t be bold.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 12:19:47

How do you display tags?

Test:

\

 
Comment by bluprint
2009-01-18 15:00:56

I have posted a response followed by a linky which have not shown up…

 
Comment by bluprint
2009-01-18 15:03:29

Try again…

&lt;

That will print the less-than sign

&gt;

That will print the greater-than sign

&lt;b&gt;

That should print the whole bold tag.

I don’t know if the ampersand will actually print or not by itself (test: & ) but I used

&amp; to make sure it would print

 
 
 
Comment by WAman
2009-01-18 08:56:44

Why would you listen to economists?

 
Comment by measton
2009-01-18 09:02:20

Some economists who are not fans of Keynesian economics or stimulus packages argue that FDR’s vaunted New Deal programs, highly touted today as a model for job creation, did little to spur a U.S. recovery.

“It was finally World War II that finally ended the Great Depression,” said Bruce Bartlett,

OK how did WWII end the depression. Wasn’t it a jobs program just like the New Deal only with fewer tangible benefits at the end. What a maroon.

Comment by bluprint
2009-01-18 09:23:00

WWII didn’t end the depression, although killing off or handicapping a substantial portion of the work force probably made it appear to do so. Broken window fallacy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2009-01-18 09:44:00

Exactly. This “WW2 ended the depression” is the biggest sock of crap ever and people chirp and parrot it like it is gospel.

 
Comment by Sarah
2009-01-18 10:39:29

Yep, the way to increase wages is to decrease the pool of available workers :(

 
Comment by measton
2009-01-18 13:23:12

but it also decreased unemployment by increasing demand from our factories, they even put women to work churning out planes and such. It also decreased demand by employing a huge # of men in the military.

 
Comment by bluprint
2009-01-18 13:38:02

It may have made the GDP look better and might have even ended the recession in a technical sense but you have to consider the underlying reason for economic activity is not to fight wars or make GDP look good but to enhance the overall econmic situation for individuals. GDP is a poor measure of the overall economic condition of an individual or group of individuals.

Again, broken window. Just because it creates “jobs” does not mean there is overall economic improvement.

Seriously, google “broken window”. Wars are essentially wasted production.

 
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2009-01-18 17:09:59

“This “WW2 ended the depression” is the biggest sock of crap ever and people chirp and parrot it like it is gospel.”

Right. In fact, FDR’s death ended the Depression.

 
 
Comment by Terry
2009-01-18 09:27:36

If the question was “how did WW2 end the depression? ” the answer is:
Drafted..all 18-30 yr old men
Women in huge numbers entered the workplace
All manufacturing industries converted to a war time footing..guns, tanks, ships, ammo.
War is a simple form of destruction and renewal.
At present, the US has lost its manufacturing base. my question is: Without steel mills, forge shops, machining centers, assembly plants, foundries and the skilled people to operate them, how in any shape of the imagination, can the US even think about engaging in a major conflict? Are we going to buy ak47’s from China, tanks from Russia, jet aircraft from Japan? Oil to run a war from Saudi Arabia..Russia. I think not. The world is watching the US go down and when push comes to shove, China will sell us our military uniforms, with big red targets on them.
WW2 was a major conflict…by the time this country got its s…t together, China and Russia, will have cleaned our clocks.
Kiss global warming goodbye and buy American….use it or lose it!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by robin
2009-01-18 23:05:59

Heavy metal is old school. Nukes are light in weight and far more efficient. I hate both equally.

 
Comment by ButImNotDeadYet
2009-01-19 00:12:21

Most manufacturing these days is done and/or controlled by machines. The manpower required to pull off a World War II manufacturing effort in the U.S. today would probably require about one-tenth of the people it required at the time.

If you want to get rid of unemployment, someone will need to turn off all the machines that have taken away all those jobs…

 
 
Comment by Darrell in PHX
2009-01-18 09:52:39

The depression was due to excess demand and insufficient supply. Wipe out 2/3rds of the world’s industrial base. Oh, look. Now there is demand for U.S. goods again.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by bluprint
2009-01-18 09:55:26

The depression was due to excess demand and insufficient supply.

Huh? Did you intend to reverse those?

 
Comment by Darrell in PHX
2009-01-18 12:23:49

ooops… reverse that!

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 12:25:52

The destruction of much of the world’s industrial base (other than the U.S.’s) may not have hurt the U.S. economy. And we had the benefit (through the Marshall Plan) of reshaping the economies of our western European and Japanese trade partners in our own image.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-01-18 05:56:20

DON’T BANK ON IT!
FHLBS FALL; LOOK FOR $$…

Two-thirds of the Federal Home Loan Banks, their balance sheets weakened by investments in toxic mortgage securities, could be forced to turn to the federal government for a rescue that could reach as high as $13.5 billion.

Already, several of the crippled FHLBs, the largest source of mortgage credit in the country, have stopped paying dividends to member banks, which are smaller banks and thrifts, which could lead to an increase in mortgage rates or in a noticeable decrease mortgage availability.

On Friday, FHLB Pittsburgh, one of the largest of the 12 regional bank-owned FHL Banks with $99 billion in assets, told its member banks that it is on the brink of falling below regulatory capital levels.

Paul Miller, a banking analyst with Friedman Billings Ramsey, told The Post it was likely an Obama Treasury Dept. would provide TARP money to prop up the FHLBs because having a chain of mortgage banks fail would automatically make mortgage rates go up.

The problems of eight of the 12 FHL Banks falling below the 4 percent regulatory loan loss provision level is the result of a move made a decade ago to invest in riskier, but higher yielding, private mortgage-backed securities and not those mortgages backed by Fannie and Freddie.

FHLB Pittsburgh admitted Friday that at least one-third of their $8.8 billion in mortgage-backed securities are trading at 65 cents on the dollar.

The federal government created the 12 FHLBs in 1932, during the Great Depression, to provide mortgage liquidity. The 12 regional FHLBs across the country are owned by roughly 8,100 banks.

The 12 FHLB heads wrote a letter last week to the accounting standards board asking for a change in the rules that will allow them to keep from marking the mortgage bonds to their actual value.

Some troubled FHL Banks are also asking their regulator to drop the ratio. But sources inside the Federal Housing Finance Agency say that is unlikely to happen because the regulator’s first goal is to preserve capital - not to Band-Aid failed balance sheets.

The FHLB Banks are not automatically qualified for TARP money and will need their regulator, James Lockhart, to lobby Washington.

Comment by palmetto
2009-01-18 06:29:52

“The 12 FHLB heads wrote a letter last week to the accounting standards board asking for a change in the rules that will allow them to keep from marking the mortgage bonds to their actual value.”

Naturally. Why should anything be transparent these days?

I feel like I’m in the middle of a funhouse mirror nightmare.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-01-18 06:54:27

Maybe they feel transparency isn’t really necessary so long as they figure the government will finance all economic activity from here on out?

Comment by palmetto
2009-01-18 07:00:56

Yeah, it’s like, “Please, suh, where can I gets me some papers to apply to be a lyin’ sack of crap, too?”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2009-01-18 08:35:39

I love how they’ve been paying dividends for years as the losses piled up.

Kind of like the former Financial Secretary of my Union Local.

But the sane people are taking back the farm now!!

Wonder how long it will take for the rest of the country?

 
Comment by scdave
2009-01-18 09:51:14

Gator…By the way…I agree with a consumption tax being the way to go…

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 12:27:30

“Two-thirds of the Federal Home Loan Banks, their balance sheets weakened by investments in toxic mortgage securities, could be forced to turn to the federal government for a rescue that could reach as high as $13.5 billion.”

Having thrown billions of dollars down the real estate lending rat hole, they obviously are well qualified for a bailout.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-01-18 06:07:47

Reading some comments from people at the Detroit auto show. Appears to be a good turn out. The majority interviewed while interested in the ‘green’ autos had no plans to buy them. Instead looking at traditional horse power, with more interest in larger cars/SUV’s etc.

So with the D.C. gang breathing down their neck more than ever looks like their focus on ‘green’ will be ill timed, as far as consumers are concerned.

Comment by Asparagus
2009-01-18 07:20:34

I think that auto show is a huge disconnect. It attracts real motor heads who obsess over the power of the internal combustion engine and anything else threatens their masculinity.

I hear those reports too,from the “purists”. It’s a poor sample, and misses the markets tastes in automobiles. (It’s probably Detroit’s main source of info for design and improvements.)

Comment by polly
2009-01-18 08:07:43

Bingo. People who go to car shows may be more likely to buy a car every two years than the rest of us. But there are enough more people who don’t go to car shows so that our buying power would dwarf that of the people who do go.

Course, I will probably end up buying used when my “tween” car (twelve years old) finally dies, but still….

Comment by BanteringBear
2009-01-18 12:00:37

Interesting you bought a used care that’s twelve years old and still running. I bought new in 2005 and I don’t see it lasting nearly that long. The engineering and construction is piss poor.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2009-01-18 15:50:29

‘97 Ford Taurus. Was a fleet car at my old employer. I got it after a Swedish engineer baby sat it though a few problems over its first four years (new transmission and battery died). Got it for less than $5000 (what it was predicted to bring at auction). I must admit that I don’t put a lot of miles on it now, but it does have over 100K.

 
Comment by BanteringBear
2009-01-18 17:01:26

A large contributor to my decision to buy new was the fact that I log a lot of miles, and I made the mistake of thinking that if I maintained the vehicle properly, I’d have something which would last a good 10-12 years without major repairs. Boy was I ever wrong…

 
 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2009-01-18 11:37:11

I see the same attitude whenever I read one of those car magazines in a doctor’s waiting room. The writers seem to think that everybody needs a car with great acceleration and all the latest gadgets. Fuel-efficient little cars are derided as “econoboxes”. The fact is that the vast majority of drivers only need a box on four wheels to drive to work and back.

 
 
Comment by In Montana
2009-01-18 08:08:58

Onsite commenter at CR says winning bids are waaayyyy down from last year for collector cars.

Comment by In Montana
2009-01-18 09:28:26

oops, maybe a different event. my bad

 
 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2009-01-18 08:33:10

The local FHLB was bankrolling Countrywide with wheelbarrel loads a couple years ago.

This probably showed up Friday, talking about Bank of America waffling on Merrill Lynch takeover:
http://finance.yahoo.com/techticker/article/159946/Bank-of-America-Shocker:-How-Much-More-Will-Taxpayers-Take

Bank of America Shocker: How Much More Will Taxpayers Take?

“Everyone today is focused on the Merrill Lynch deal, but Lewis also acquired Countrywide Financial, the biggest and most aggressive lender of the subprime era. Raise your hand if you think there aren’t huge losses coming from that portfolio.

(italics as in the article)

 
Comment by measton
2009-01-18 09:04:52

The majority interviewed while interested in the ‘green’ autos had no plans to buy them. Instead looking at traditional horse power, with more interest in larger cars/SUV’s etc.

1. I imagine people who attend car shows are always more likely to be interested in fast cars.
2. Quick way to fix this - Tax gas and cut payroll taxes.

Comment by exeter
2009-01-18 11:45:19

“2. Quick way to fix this - Tax gas and cut payroll taxes.”

BINGO

 
 
Comment by BP
2009-01-18 10:00:47

Get used to central planning. Government picking the “right” tech, industry, companies and so on. For all those who love this idea, please give an example of a country that has expanded it’s economy long term based on central planning.

Comment by measton
2009-01-18 13:24:33

CHINA

 
Comment by ecofeco
2009-01-18 20:03:48

You seem to think government and corporate America are separate.

We”ll have whatever the corporations want us to have, and if it’s “central planning” then that’s what we’ll get.

I will now direct you to the formation the original Business Roundtable in the 1970s and various “think tanks” (more corporate shills) in the same era.

 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2009-01-18 06:08:09

Walking away: The wide and lasting impact of quitting a mortgage

By ALEJANDRO LAZO

The Washington Post

Sunday, January 18, 2009

WASHINGTON — Benjamin McNelley said he loathed the idea of walking away from the mortgage on his four-bedroom, two-bath house in Fauquier County, Va.

The former prison guard said he worried about what the decision might mean for his credit rating and whether he might still be on the hook for any outstanding debt.

But when both his father and his stepfather fell ill last summer in South Carolina, McNelley said, he had no choice but to quit his job and move. By then, the new house he had bought for $214,000 in 2003 and then refinanced twice during the boom years was worth far less than his mortgage, which exceeded $400,000. Selling the property proved difficult. He grew anxious.

With property values plummeting, real estate experts say American mortgage holders are increasingly walking away from properties - effectively choosing to have their lenders foreclose on them as a way out of the obligation - particularly when they owe more than their homes are worth. The practice is known simply as walking away or as “jingle mail,” referring to when a homeowner mails the keys back to a lender.

While there is no precise way to know how many foreclosures are due to people walking away, experts said the practice has become more common as more homeowners owe more on their mortgage than the home is worth. In some cases, homeowners can afford to keep paying but decide not to because they have little invested in the property or owe so much that they no longer see the value in continuing to pay.

“The prevailing sentiment over the last five to six years has been that a home is primarily an investment and secondarily a place to live,” said Guy Cecala, the publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance in Bethesda, Md. “If that is in fact your thinking, it makes it very difficult to make a decision to continue paying your mortgage if you don’t think that investment is going to increase over the next five years.”

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-01-18 08:33:23

As always, the obvious question of what the FB did with the money (in this case at least $200K) he took out of his “ATM” wasn’t asked.

Comment by not a gator
2009-01-18 08:39:27

this article made me laugh from the first sentence… Fauquier county … and the hits keep coming…

4bd house for a prison guard

paid a ridiculous 213K

financed it up to 400K!

previous gen. sick, must quit job … uh huh …probably was getting some “economic outpatient care”

hahahaha … yep, walk away …

“Happy times will soon be here again.” — motto from a shot glass circa 1930.

 
Comment by scdave
2009-01-18 09:54:19

Exactly Bill !!

 
Comment by Jimbo
2009-01-18 10:34:03

Why, unspecified “home improvements and medical expenses,” of course; that’s always what they say. I’ve asked this before: Does the bill for a hair transplant qualify as a medical expense?

 
 
Comment by rms
2009-01-18 09:46:17

“By then, the new house he had bought for $214,000 in 2003 and then refinanced twice during the boom years was worth far less than his mortgage, which exceeded $400,000. Selling the property proved difficult. He grew anxious.”

Benjamin McNelley needs the ‘ol Joshua Tree shoved way up his greedy tail pipe!

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-01-18 06:14:41

Was down in Augusta Ga. on Sat. Tagged along on a trip to Circuit City and Best Buy. C. City was a mob scene folks looking for close out bargains. I didn’t see what I would call huge price cuts though. B.Buy packed also, many big screen flat panels being bought.Along with gadgets.

I rarely go shopping and was surprised at the huge volume of people packing the shopping centers, may just be a normal Sat. for the great American consumer as far as I know.

Signs everywhere, EZ credit, 90 days same as cash, no credit check etc…

Comment by yogurt
2009-01-18 06:29:10

Butbutbut… I thought there was a “credit crunch”? :-)

 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-01-18 06:43:23

Too bad most all the stuff at BBY and CC isn’t made here.

 
Comment by takingbets
2009-01-18 06:50:25

I took my niece to toys-r-us yesterday and alot of their shelves were empty. It looks like they dident restock after Christmas. A sign of things to come?

Comment by mikey
2009-01-18 08:31:56

They should rename the store ” Toys-R-China” because you’d be hard pressed to find anything in there made in the US :)

 
Comment by WAman
2009-01-18 08:59:55

Maybe could have something to do with bankrupcty?

 
 
Comment by EliteWino
2009-01-18 08:09:49

Here in Connecticut I was amazed at what I saw yesterday, store parking lots packed, restaurants packed, lines at all the gas stations, SUV’s flying everywhere.

People are truly delusional. I know they don’t really have this money to blow. Maybe it’s the last big fling before they yank the cards?

Comment by not a gator
2009-01-18 08:41:45

Some people bought new Mercedes in the last six months. Yes, I know the brand image has improved recently, but considering how many beemers have been “returned to sender” lately, it does make you wonder.

Well, I guess some people still have cash to burn. The fate of several local restaurants indicates that there are less cashburners and less cash per burner than previously, however.

 
 
Comment by exeter
2009-01-18 11:59:29

Circuit City in Brookfield, CT was mobbed yesterday. No price slashing observed at all. Asked sales staff and they said 10% off ticketed price.

Whatta joke.

Comment by In Colorado
2009-01-18 13:06:46

LOL! I was debating whether or not to visit our local CC, but decided to pass. 10% off? Pfffttt! Good thing I didn’t waste my time.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-01-18 13:53:21

Watch out for liquidation prices. When a liquidation company takes over the store they will sell the stock at a higher price. You are not getting a deal. Shop and compare prices.

 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2009-01-18 06:27:53

Three words that strike dread into the heart of someone looking for a decent rental: “Section 8 OK”.

Comment by aNYCdj
2009-01-18 06:36:30

Ponder this Palmetto:

Welcome to the New Section 8 Gated McMansionvilles. Walled off low life’s with armed security guards at the entrance gates making sure your drug/ gangsta buddies cant get in …..

How long will section 8 people live like that?…….

Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-01-18 08:23:14

We thought of that too, but we have opposing viewpoints. As McMansions become rentals and the HOA’s get hungry for cash flow it will turn once nice areas into beehive living qtrs for sec 8. Our old McMansion was approx. 4,000 sq ft. What is that in illegal ghetto housing, 4 or 5 families?

It can be done. Some beautiful Mansions off Hollywood Blvd were sectioned off to become apts (and became dumps) years ago.

Comment by Jimbo
2009-01-18 11:04:54

You should see what has become of the sturdy beach houses built in Atlantic City roughly one century ago. The door to each room now has its own padlock; firemen dread responding to the frequent fires that are started by hotplates, kerosene heaters, and invariably leave 20 to 25 people without a roof over their heads. I drive with my sons through the Chelsea section of town and tell them, “Normal families lived here when I was growing up.” It’s hard to believe and sad to see.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-01-18 06:49:22

You got that right!

In our fair city they are building a ‘mixed’ use development, houses starting $219,000.00 with section 8 OK (city funding). The PTB call this being on the cutting edge of ‘diversity’ of course ‘they’ don’t want to live there, and so far the project has sold 2%. I am laugh my ass off at this failed concept, sad part is the millions in wasted tax dollars.

The place will be a slum in the next few years. It’s been tried over and over and this time it’s ‘not different’. Same out come failure!

Comment by denquiry
2009-01-18 07:48:12

Nationalized housing will follow nationalized banking. Do what the govt tells you or find your $ss out on the street.

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-01-18 16:22:00

This is why apartment complex renting is better and will get better. Better class of people, more law abiding, no incentive to lie about income, etc.

I can imagine McMansions in Queen Creek with section 8 families moved in. Dirty diapers on the floor, kid poo in the corner of the living room, rap noise played loud at odd hours, gaunt meth-head minors and adults roaming around. House prices will continue to fall in an environment of nationalized houses. Real estate would be the worst investment of the first 50 years of this century in such a case. There is no guarantee that your biggest purchase - your house, will always be among educated civilized neighbors who respect the other neighbors’ desire for a tranquil clean neighborhood that is safe to raise children with proper values.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by waiting in_la
2009-01-18 11:37:00

what’s PTB stand for, again?

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-01-18 12:24:33

PTB=Powers to Be

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Colorado
2009-01-18 13:09:10

Powers that be, i.e. the people who are really in charge, as opposed to our elected leaders.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-01-18 13:54:22

Colorado is correct. PTB stands for Powers that be. My mistake.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 12:29:45

pass the bailout

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-01-18 13:56:53

Although, I like PB explanation better. :)

 
 
 
 
Comment by polly
2009-01-18 08:18:20

Umm…isn’t it illegal to discriminate in provision of housing based on use of section 8? You can discriminate on all sorts of things that aren’t protected (purple hair, obsessive passion for bobble head dolls, says “like” too much, chews gum while viewing the rental, bad FICO score, etc.) and can’t for things that are protected (race, religion, national origin, use of section 8, disability, having children, plus whatever each state and locality adds in). I think whether you have to explicitly state it in the ad may be dependent on how many units you have, but the requirement not to discriminate in housing is pretty clear.

Comment by not a gator
2009-01-18 08:45:32

bad FICO score and bad referrals can pretty much screen out undesireable sec 8’s, I should think…

there are a few “creampuff” tenants on sec. 8.

some LL’s only want sec. 8 because they can fool the gov’t into paying them 50% over market rate.

Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-01-18 08:57:39

After selling our McMansion, our month to month rental at full price for us, turned out to be sec 8 housing for many here. When sec 8 tenants have a plumbing issue, the resident manager jumps. When us full paying independent tenants have one, we wait on the manager’s time table. We don’t have social workers and report forms, is my guess.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2009-01-18 10:50:57

But you can post nasty reviews on the rental review websites. Or organize lots of people to join you. Might not help, but it can make you feel better….

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-01-19 11:51:35

In florida, failing to fix plumbing in timely manner is grounds to sue and you can put the rent in an escrow account until the matter is resolved.

you should check on the laws in your state.

 
 
 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-01-18 08:46:01

Polly,
True. You know what gets my goat. The right of welfare receiptients to get a mortgage with discrimination protection under Federal Law. Disabled is a given, but welfare receiptents should be discriminated against. Owning a home is not a right, it should be earned.

I also think private property owners should have rights too. If I don’t want to rent to *illegals*(*law breakers/criminals), I should have the right of choice. I believe the laws go too far.

Comment by yogurt
2009-01-18 09:58:32

Welfare recipients cannot be discriminated against because of their source of income.. That means that a bank has to treat someone getting $1000/month on welfare the same as someone making $1000/month at McD’s.

Many people are on welfare because of disabilities. Why shouldn’t they have the same right to buy a house as anyone else with the same income?

That’s all. Banks were never prevented from imposing income requirements and verifying income. That’s something they decided to do themselves - liar loans - when they could dump the trash on the secondary market. Now that they can’t do that anymore, income verification is back.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2009-01-18 10:52:49

Thanks for covering that, yogurt. Well said.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-01-18 16:15:11

Then the question is: Would you buy a house next to one whose occupant is getting a welfare check? If not, why not?

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2009-01-18 21:03:44

I’d rather my neighbor was on welfare than loud with a new live in pot smoking boyfriend. My wife hates that smell.

She was sure the funny ash like stuff in our pool was tossed over the fence. I suggested it was more likely just some dumb Texan burning newspaper in his chimney during the cold snap.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-01-18 10:03:35

This thread would not get very far if this was the socialist 1970s. So many hand wringing socialists felt sorry for welfare people and thought the welfare folks would conform to better cultures by integrating them into upscale neighborhoods. But it all backfired and drug down the value of the neighborhoods.

If you have no guarantee that your neighborhood won’t become section 8, then why would you want to invest in that neighborhood?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MightyMike
2009-01-18 14:41:19

You don’t feel sorry for the kids who have to grow up with welfare mothers who have no father around in high-crime neighborhood?

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-01-18 16:02:13

No. I’m a Darwinist.

My oldest sister and her husband and son lived in section 8 in the late 70s. She, a lifelong Republican (still). They had two more kids in the early 80s, despite barely making ends meet. That sister has 4 year degree. Low income to this day.

Most of these people put themselves in poverty. My sister’s reasoning - a mother should not have to work. Well she started working in 2001 when the money ran out - divorce, and the money stream from my dad dried up after my dad passed away. My 32 year old nephew (33 in April) worked one year in his life. No car, no girlfriend, no ambition. Social IQ very low, but he is otherwise intelligent. It’s part of being in a depressed abyss with no realization how to get out. Until he realizes he has free choice, he will stay living like he is 33 going on 12.

Ask me if I’m proud, but don’t assume I never tried to persuade them to change. I got blue in the face.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2009-01-18 21:40:45

Bill, you wouldn’t last 2 minutes in a REAL Darwinist society.

 
Comment by jane
2009-01-19 05:19:42

Eco, what would a real Darwinist society look like? Not trying to be funny or anything, but it FEELS like we’re in one already, for the most part. It feels like the posts about bustling shopping centers in GA and CT are more the exception than the rule.

 
 
 
Comment by denquiry
2009-01-18 08:50:45

but the requirement not to discriminate in housing is pretty clear.
——————————————————————
IMO, that’s why we are in the mess we are in. Not enough discriminatin going on.

Comment by yogurt
2009-01-18 10:08:08

You are confusing “qualification” with “discrimination”. Qualification means requiring someone applying for a loan to demonstrate ability to pay it back. Discrimination means denying people loans on irrelevant criteria like race, religion, etc.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by denquiry
2009-01-18 14:29:20

discriminate—the non PC definition

1. The act or an instance of distinguishing: differentiation, distinction, separation. See same/different/compare.
2. The ability to distinguish, especially to recognize small differences or draw fine distinctions: refinement, selectiveness, selectivity. See precise/imprecise.
3. Skill in perceiving, discriminating, or judging: acumen, astuteness, clear-sightedness, discernment, eye, keenness, nose, penetration, perceptiveness, percipience, percipiency, perspicacity, sagacity, sageness, shrewdness, wit. See ability/inability, careful/careless.

 
Comment by denquiry
2009-01-18 14:45:12

discriminate–the non PC version

1. The act or an instance of distinguishing: differentiation, distinction, separation. See same/different/compare.
2. The ability to distinguish, especially to recognize small differences or draw fine distinctions: refinement, selectiveness, selectivity. See precise/imprecise.
3. Skill in perceiving, discriminating, or judging: acumen, astuteness, clear-sightedness, discernment, eye, keenness, nose, penetration, perceptiveness, percipience, percipiency, perspicacity, sagacity, sageness, shrewdness, wit. See ability/inability, careful/careless.

 
Comment by novawatcher
2009-01-18 14:52:45

Nope, discrimination does not men denying people loans based on irrelavant criteria.

Discrimination means “to be able to tell things apart” (see JNDs and discriminations thresholds). For example, I can discriminate between apples and pears. I can also discriminate between those that have the ability to pay and those that do not.

To use the word ‘discriminate’ the other way is to use it incorrectly. That is not unlike the use of the term gender. Gender is a grammatical category, whereas sex is a biological category. Or to put it another way, gender is the type of pants you wear, and sex is determined by what is underneath those clothes. I can go in drag and call myself a ’she’, but my sex would still remain male. Most people really mean ’sex’ when they use the word ‘gender’. I dunno if they are ignorant or are too afraid to use the word ’sex’ because it also refers to an act, or maybe it’s some sort of PC remnant (e.g. “gender politics”).

 
Comment by MightyMike
2009-01-18 18:25:35

You two are getting silly here. Of course, you can go pull out the Oxford English Dictionary and find a dozen different meanings for the word discrimination. In America, when we use the term discrimination in regards to housing we’re talking landlords, realtors, etc. discriminating against people because of their race, religion, disability, etc. It’s not PC or non-PC, it’s how the word has been used for at least 50 years in this country.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Leighsong
2009-01-18 09:42:28

AP (google title for link)

Influx of black renters raises tension in Bay Area
By PAUL ELIAS – Dec 30, 2008

ANTIOCH, Calif. (AP) — As more and more black renters began moving into this mostly white San Francisco Bay Area suburb a few years ago, neighbors started complaining about loud parties, mean pit bulls, blaring car radios, prostitution, drug dealing and muggings of schoolchildren.

In 2006, as the influx reached its peak, the police department formed a special crime-fighting unit to deal with the complaints, and authorities began cracking down on tenants in federally subsidized housing.

Now that police unit is the focus of lawsuits by black families who allege the city of 100,000 is orchestrating a campaign to drive them out.

“A lot of people are moving out here looking for a better place to live,” said Karen Coleman, a mother of three who came here five years ago from a blighted neighborhood in nearby Pittsburg. “We are trying to raise our kids like everyone else. But they don’t want us here.”

City officials deny the allegations in the lawsuits, which were filed last spring and seek unspecified damages.

Across the country, similar tensions have simmered when federally subsidized renters escaped run-down housing projects and violent neighborhoods by moving to nicer communities in suburban Washington, Chicago and Los Angeles. (Cont’d)

Leigh

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-01-18 10:21:23

This has barely started in the rental areas along Anza Ave. in Torrance. Three years ago when I last lived here you would not see the section 8 types. Now a lot of the apartments, including this same complex I lived in before are allowing section 8.

So far no problem, but I anticipate it will get worse and I will be moving to Hermosa Beach to escape from this element.

Comment by scdave
2009-01-18 11:16:28

Hermosa Beach…:)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by skroodle
2009-01-18 10:49:13

Houston went through the same thing after Katrina. From what my friends there have told me, the gang bangers and drug dealers all moved back to New Orleans due to the Houston police force discriminating on criminals.

Comment by Leighsong
2009-01-18 13:11:23

We visited New Orleans pre and post Katrina - Houston as well.

After Katrina, New Orleans never felt right. Houston was a zoo - horrible traffic, expensive hotels, long lines to eat etc.

Haven’t been to either in the last two years, and I don’t think we’re missing much!

Leigh

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-01-18 14:37:52

Maybe its turned into Little mexico…they had to hire 15,000+ illegals to do the repair demolition work because the locals (9th ward people) didn’t want the jobs

Notice too jesse, Al, Naacp, NEVER held a jobs march in New Orleans

———————-
After Katrina, New Orleans never felt right.

 
 
 
Comment by CA renter
2009-01-19 04:42:06

“A lot of people are moving out here looking for a better place to live,” said Karen Coleman, a mother of three who came here five years ago from a blighted neighborhood in nearby Pittsburg. “We are trying to raise our kids like everyone else. But they don’t want us here.”
———————–

The sad part about this comment is that Ms. Coleman is probably bringing that “blighted neighborhood” with her in the back seat of her car.

This happened in the Antelope Valley (Palmdale and Lancaster areas near L.A.) during the last downturn.

These very same “concerned” parents are the very same parents who fight against uniforms in school, strict law/code enforcement, etc. and who buy their kids those baggy “poopy pants” and rap music CDs so the kids can “fit in” with their peers.

Time to check what’s living in your own house.

Comment by not a gator
2009-01-19 12:02:45

they don’t buy them for the kids, typically (you know how conniving kids can be about sneaking contraband clothing into school, playing hooky, etc), but the problems do follow the kids…

I’d say the boyfriends are one of the big problems, having kids they can’t afford, won’t get a job, spending the woman’s child support money so they can drive around town…

but I feel bad for the kids. I don’t know what it is, but if you come from a crappy ‘hood, some other kid is always trying to mess you up.

they call it the crab bucket. try to crawl out and somebody else grabs you and pulls you back in.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2009-01-18 06:41:31

This truly must be Henry Kissinger’s finest hour. He arrived in the US hellbent on its destruction and the time is almost near. Only Peter Jennings had the courage to ask him publicly how it felt to be a war criminal.

I’ve never understood how this guy is still around, behind the scenes, advising and destroying. “Schtay da coarze”. LOL! I’m sure he’s wormed his way into the Obama camp as well. Why do people even tolerate the toad?

Comment by exeter
2009-01-18 12:07:20

The puke lives a few miles down the road but that doesn’t stop housing from collapsing around here.

So much for “bbbbbbbbbbbbbut Kissinger lives here, it’s exclusive”.

 
 
Comment by Michael Fink
2009-01-18 06:46:37

If only there was a comments section:

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localnews/content/business/epaper/2009/01/18/sunbiz_walkaway_0118.html

The wide and lasting effects of walking away on a MTG. Pretty good information, but they neglect to tell most of the pluses for walking away. Those who bought close to the peak will NEVER recoup their losses, and the losses are so big that they will live their entire lives less well then they would if they hadn’t made one bad decision.

The thought that the middle class American (who bought at the top of the boom) can just take a 100-200-300K loss on the chin is.. Well, it’s just insane. They need to get out of these terrible transaction, take the credit hit, and buy again in 5-7 years.

 
Comment by max4me
2009-01-18 06:47:34

interesting news, I am hear in Japan not far away from the city of Toyota. The people there are not happy, there is talk of work sharing.

The other day I went by the public housing in Nagoya, the they remind me of old soviet style apartment blocks. The rent is cheap and the most common people living there are Brazilians, most Japanese dont want to live among them.

The Brazilians are going home, there is no work. The housing office is now offering to rent, and hook you up with a bank that will loan you the down payment and six months worth of rent, and they will roll it over into a nice 10 year loan.

Of course you need to be on unemployment insurance to get the deal.

Comment by palmetto
2009-01-18 06:54:42

“they remind me of old soviet style apartment blocks.”

Hey, we have lots of those here in the US. It’s how a lot of the bubble development looks (with a few frills on it just to relieve the ugliness).

“The Brazilians are going home, there is no work.”

I think people will realize that this “global migration” thing has been a spectacular farce. Somebody done hunted all those caribou and camels to extinction.

 
Comment by nhz
2009-01-18 07:06:13

“Of course you need to be on unemployment insurance to get the deal.”

sounds like the Netherlands, except that public housing is generally good quality here. Our public housing agencies prefer people on social security, as they have the most secure income stream. Public housing is not available nowadays for those who pay out of their own pocket - they have to be on a waiting list for 5-10 years, or rent in the free market where rents are 2-4x higher. As a result, many of the areas with public housing are going downhill quickly while they used to be really nice 10-20 years ago.

Immigrants (’refugees’) often get ‘legalised’ here after waiting a few years. In that case they hit the jackpot: full social benefits and free healthcare, nice new rental home right away, often completely new furnishing for the home to the tune of 25K euro or so - all paid for by the government. Research shows that more than 80% of these immigrants never get a paid job in their life (and why would they …).

It will take many years before these economies get healthy again.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-01-18 07:14:12

With that kind of largesse, will the EU economies ever get healthy again?

BTW, our family in Austria has been sharing similar stories for years now. Often I wonder why my contemporaries over there even bother with school and jobs anymore.

 
Comment by max4me
2009-01-18 07:16:21

can you enlighten me as too the goal of these social programs, I feel that in America the point of section 8, welfare etc, is to basically keep the “have nots” from voting socialist, or worse robing their rich neighbors

Comment by palmetto
2009-01-18 07:31:47

Sounds about right to me. It’s a mess. Landlords take Section 8 because they can get more money for the dump they are renting, while some poor working stiff who pays his way and doesn’t qualify for section 8 has a hard time finding a place with a reasonable rent.

California is threatening to cut off welfare payments. I’d love to see this happen. Many think there would be riots as a result. I wouldn’t like to see that happen.

For some lowlifes, welfare is the modern day equivalent of taking a child, maiming it and setting it out to beg. There are those who live off the welfare payments they receive for their children.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by max4me
2009-01-18 07:47:16

my family does rentals and section 8, even setting rents lower than market section 8 is the only way we can keep stuff full.

I have first hand cleaned some of these places after people leave. Its a…trying experience. over time we have developed a mind set of… lets see how are they going to ruin this place? okay tile in the hallway, red and black battle squares in the kitchen.

We also know all too well that you need to keep certain “elements” outs cause the people who work hard and pay on time will leave should they feel their quality of life getting hurt. whether it be safety or just a good nights sleep.

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-01-18 08:53:15

you got that right! I have a great LL now. Low, low rent, small but decent apt, great maintenance, quiet, and they WILL intervene if it’s not.

they carefully screen tenants. for this they NEVER have to advertise! yep, they get tons of referrals, because good tenants love living with good tenants.

 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-01-18 09:06:33

Evidently, you don’t have the illegals and other assorted trash playing loud music at 2AM, falling down drunk in the apt above you, and enjoying a scenic walk to the parking lot of viewing trash and unruly anchor brats.

Can we come visit for a quiet night’s sleep?

The next home we buy, we’re going to discriminate against the wrong neighbors. We’ll shop carefully.

 
Comment by max4me
2009-01-18 09:34:41

“Evidently, you don’t have the illegals and other assorted trash playing loud music at 2AM, falling down drunk in the apt above you, and enjoying a scenic walk to the parking lot of viewing trash and unruly anchor brats.”

haha they were there when we bough the complex in 94, half my family did repair work packing heat. The manager had a shot gun pulled on her.

Simple gang rivalry, one time the shooter showed up and was getting out of the car with a shot gun, only to turn to look over his shoulder and find my cousin with colt 45 in his face, said his eyes got as big a cartoon character and he dove back in the car, the driver sped off, they quilted down for awhile, and we evicted the rival they was after.

Sadly when people try to make this stuff a racial issue, its really just a money issue, having gang bangers, or hookers, or tweakers or the Mormon keeping a Mistress which leads to drama, will result in vacancies. And gosh darn it will hurt our wallets.

 
 
 
Comment by MightyMike
2009-01-18 11:56:29

NHZ: How do the people of the Netherlands feel about that? Are there any opinion polls that ask the people what they think about these foreigners coming in and getting benefits and never working?

Wasn’t there a time 30 or 40 years ago when the Dutch culture was heavily influenced by the Calvinist churches that encouraged hard work, thrift, etc.?

Comment by nhz
2009-01-20 02:59:58

a bit late but anyway:

this has been one of the major issues in politics over the last 10 years or so. When it comes to immigrants, a majority is against the current ‘loose’ policy but often not with the right kind of motives IMHO; some people are just islamophotic. I have no problem with immigrants as long as they work for their money and accept our laws. The same applies for native Dutchies as far as they are able to work (there are far more non-working Dutchies than lazy immigrants). Of course some people are in favour of the current immigrant policy because they profit from it somehow (wellfare workers, teachers, RE speculators etc.).

Even in the 16/17th century the Dutch were complaining about immigrants taking their jobs, lowering wages and putting high pressure on social wellfare. In those times wellfare was mostly raising their child if they could not pay for it themselves, and send them overseas with the VOC company or some other slave labor job.

Netherlands has always been an immigrant country so immigration in itself is not a problem; the problem is we get the wrong kind of immigrants now, who come for a lifetime vacation without work, instead of wanting to work to improve their own economic situation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-01-18 07:00:10

“In his 1988 book, The Collapse of Complex Societies, Joseph Tainter argued that all societies - like all organisms - are doomed. Tainter studied ancient Rome as well as the Mayan civilization. He noticed that problems always blaze up. Each one - whether climatic, political or economic - rings the firehall bell. And each solution - and readers may substitute the word “bailout” for solution - brings more challenges and takes more resources. Finally, the available resources are worn out.

“Tainter observes that when the costs become high enough, people seem to give up. By the end of Roman era, for example, the burdens of empire were so heavy that people sold themselves into slavery to get free of them. So many people did so at one point that the authorities had to come up with another solution; they outlawed the practice. Henceforth, Roman citizens were required by law to remain free!”

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-01-18 11:47:58

Another present day example might be Japan’s declining birth rate.

Comment by robin
2009-01-19 00:02:41

I believe their Boomer “Pig-in-a-python” is several years ahead of ours.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-01-18 07:05:46

Credit Where Credit is Due…

Peter Schiff
Jan 19, 2009

In a recent speech before the London School of Economics, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke offered a perverse economic theory in his quest to gather support for never-ending Wall Street bailouts; “This disparate treatment, unappealing as it is, appears unavoidable. Our economic system is critically dependent on the free flow of credit, and the consequences for the broader economy of financial instability are thus powerful and quickly felt.” In other words, credit is the lifeblood of our economy, and the continued operation of credit providers is an issue of national security.

In truth, not all economies run on credit. But over the last decade, the United States became a bubble economy that needed unlimited credit to keep from collapsing. In a legitimate economy, it is not credit that fuels spending and investment, but simply income and savings. It’s too bad our Fed chairman does not understand the difference.

That American families now routinely rely on credit to make every-day purchases is a habit that needs to be broken and not encouraged. What we need in America is more restraint and less indulgence. For example, Americans in the current economy should not go into debt to buy new cars. Given the level of debt that weighs down the typical family, Americans should defer such purchases until they have paid down existing debt, or replenished their savings to the point where they can afford to pay cash. Until that time, Americans should continue driving their old cars. In the meantime, the untapped savings could be made available to local businesses that would use it to finance badly needed capital investments.

But such a drastic reversal in financial culture represents the kind of change that no one in the outgoing or incoming Administrations appears willing to consider. By providing perpetual support to lenders who have bankrupted themselves through bad loans, the government merely guarantees that bad economic behavior will continue.

Credit is indeed vital to an economy, but it does not constitute an economy within itself. The important thing to remember is that credit is scarce, and is limited by the stock of savings. Savings loaned to one individual is not available to be loaned to another until it is repaid. If it is never repaid, the savings are lost. Loans to consumers not only crowd out more productive loans that might have been made to business, but they have a far greater likelihood of ending in default. In addition, while business loans increase our capital stock and lead to greater productivity, loans made to consumers are merely spent, and do not create conditions that will make repayment easier. When businesses borrow to fund capital investments, the extra cash flows that result are used to repay the loans. When individuals borrow to spend, loans can only be repaid out of reduced future consumption.

One of the reasons we are in such dire straits is that consumers have already borrowed and spent too much. Many did so based on the false belief that ever-appreciating real estate would ultimately provide the means to repay their debts and finance their lifestyles. Now that reality has finally set in, why should the spending spree continue? The fact that a GDP comprised of 70 percent of consumption is currently contracting should not surprise anyone. In fact, such a contraction is long overdue and the government should not do anything to interfere.

In trying to perpetuate the illusion, the government wants to revive the spending spree that has led us to this disaster. But how can such actions possibly help? How will more debt improve the economy? Wouldn’t our circumstances be vastly improved if we paid off some of our debts and replenished our savings? Wouldn’t we be in better shape if instead of buying more stuff we concentrated on producing it?

The unpleasant reality is that years of bad monetary and fiscal policy have over encumbered our economy with debt and undermined our industrial capacity. The sooner we can begin to repair the damages, the sooner we can right the ship. If instead we merely administer more of the same, the ship will sink in a sea of inflation.

Comment by Michael Fink
2009-01-18 08:25:12

“For example, Americans in the current economy should not go into debt to buy new cars. Given the level of debt that weighs down the typical family, Americans should defer such purchases until they have paid down existing debt, or replenished their savings to the point where they can afford to pay cash.”

You might as well just advocate dropping a nuke on Detroit. The effect of this kind of credit contraction (where credit was totally unavailable except for purchase of a home) would make the Great Depression look like a “small blip” in the economic history of the United States. People need to be slowly weaned off this credit insanity, get them to stop HELOCing their homes as a first step. Get them to put 20% down on homes as a 2nd step (which would result in the total collapse of the housing market, as I have argued many times in the past). But removing all credit facilities on autos? That would be like step 300 in a “clean thyself of credit addition” program. That’s hardcore, much more so then the average American consumer needs today.

Personally I would support most people having credit cards that are actually charge cards (no revolving facility); that, for most people, makes much more sense. The idea of rolling debt at 20+% interest rates is something that only the financially stupid would do, we need to discourage it as much as possible.

However, there’s a bit of financial Darwinism here as well. Do we need to stop the weak from blowing themselves up? In home loans, absolutely. But in credit cards; the numbers are smaller, and the loss to the lenders is total, they will quickly get themselves back in line, offering credit only to the most worthy consumers and making it totally unavailable to others. That, frankly, is the way that unsecured credit should be given!

 
Comment by Muggy
2009-01-18 08:38:33

Credit is as credit does…

 
Comment by rms
2009-01-18 10:04:47

What’s a country to do when making money out of thin air through usury is its economic engine?

 
Comment by Darrell in PHX
2009-01-18 10:07:50

“Americans should continue driving their old cars. In the meantime, the untapped savings could be made available to local businesses that would use it to finance badly needed capital investments.”

Why would local businesses badly need capital investments, if everyone is cutting back spending?

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2009-01-18 07:10:13

Now here is an address.

8743 Uranus Ter Lake Park, FL 33403$89,900 $392 per month | Personalize this estimate | Check local mortgage rates 2 Bed, 2 Bath | 1,032 Sq Ft | MLS ID #R2987081 | Refreshed 2 hours ago

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-01-18 08:46:20

(In my best Butthead voice) “Uranus! Heheh, heheheh!”

 
 
Comment by Jas Jain
2009-01-18 07:12:23


http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0109/17422.html

PR push may save Geithner
By: John Bresnahan and Martin Kady II
January 14, 2009 11:09 AM EST

Democratic and Republican senators say a full-court press by Barack Obama’s transition team is likely to keep ethical questions from sinking the nomination of Treasury Secretary-designee Timothy Geithner.
As Obama pressed senators on his economic recovery plan Tuesday, The Wall Street Journal reported that Geithner had failed to pay $42,000 in taxes and had employed a housekeeper whose work permit had expired…

Comment by Lando: “One of the godfathers (with Rubin and Summers) of the subprime mess, a confessed tax evader that contracted a illegal immigrant, a person like Geithner that have lived from the tits of the State much of his live, that part of his education was founded with tax payers money, will be accepted by the Senate when what the Senate should do is to prosecute him! He didn’t comply the tax declaration well and will be Secretary of Treasury?! This man was President of the Federal Reserve of New York since 2003 and one of the “reformers” with Rubin and Summers of the Financial Regulation, so he is one of the morons if not delinquents that permitted the Global financial mess in which we are in. WR.”

Unstated qualifications to be nominated and confirmed as Governor of the Federal Reserve is that one must be a liar, a manipulator, a misleader of the public and, most importantly, an agent of the Bankrupters and Fraudsters of New York City (BFNYC). Since 2003 I have been warning about the American econo-political system as being: A system of the Crooks, by the Crooks and for the Crooks.

And the evidence just keeps on pouring in. There is no way to dislodge the Crooks and America as people have known is finished. Crooks will push it into a failed state juts like many top dogs in the past. NO, AMERICA IS NOT AN EXCEPTION EXCEPT FOR THE EXCEPTIONAL LEVEL OF ARROGANCE AND DENIAL OF THE REALITY.
Jas

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 08:28:34

Domestic worker problems and dodgy tax filings should not stand in the way of confirming The Messiah™’s anointed Treasury secretary designate.

Comment by Blue Skye
2009-01-18 08:45:55

Yes, but how many houses does the trust fund of his wife own, exactly?

 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-01-18 08:48:52

Jas, how DARE you criticize The Messiah’s choice?

Comment by rms
2009-01-18 10:08:56

The Messiah might actually be Geithner’s pick.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2009-01-19 12:06:28

lol, good one.

I hope he OD’s on club drugs and spends the rest of the Obama administration in a “persistant vegetative state”.

yeah, that’s harsh, but he’s a tool.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-01-18 08:48:57

Impossible - I’ve heard from a lot of highly-respectable people on this blog that once the criminal lying cabal of Bush-Cheney-Rowe was out the problem of corruption in government would be solved.

Comment by exeter
2009-01-18 12:15:17

It’s a big step in the right direction.

 
Comment by Blano
2009-01-18 13:47:45

Did Bush have any corruption issues BEFORE he took power, like Osama Obama has?? No. ‘Nuff said.

Comment by exeter
2009-01-18 14:39:18

Enough said only when it serves know-nothing causes.

But the truth about GW robbing Harkin Energy blind, taking taxpayer $$$ in the Texas Ranger scandal and the Neil Bush S&L crime syndicate are never favorite topics of know-nothings.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blano
2009-01-18 16:50:14

It’s a shame you have to resort to name calling (yet again) when you can’t handle the answer. As if the people you vote for are any better.

Nice, condescending golden nose attitude as usual. They teach you that at church??

 
Comment by exeter
2009-01-18 16:57:02

Is the truth about GW Dough Head that painful?

 
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-01-18 08:49:24

Housekeeper? Maybe she did a little more on the side and he just “forgot” her permit expired.

=======================
The Wall Street Journal reported that Geithner had failed to pay $42,000 in taxes and had employed a housekeeper whose work permit had expired…

 
Comment by hoz
2009-01-18 10:23:27

“Since 2003 I have been warning about the American econo-political system as being: A system of the Crooks, by the Crooks and for the Crooks.”

You write as if there is something wrong. Since you are a foreigner that has little historical reference a suggested reading:

An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States
By Charles A. Beard
1913

The US was established by wealthy men to protect their wealth. Mr. George Washington was the wealthiest person in the US owning 1% of all assets in this fledgling country.

There is little difference between then and now; Nor should there be.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 16:51:33

Come to think of it, the Father of our Country was also a real estate speculator :-)

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-01-18 19:24:02

I believe the majority of our founding fathers were land owners or aka real estate speculators.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by CA renter
2009-01-19 04:54:23

There is little difference between then and now; Nor should there be.
—————————

Why should it remain that way, hoz?

 
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-01-18 12:38:31

Remember what hoz says or something along these lines:

“The Fed always lies”

So why are you surprised about Timothy Geithner?

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 16:21:11

They have to keep their lies sufficiently obfuscated or else get dinged by the press.

 
 
Comment by Blano
2009-01-18 13:46:09

Doesn’t matter.

If it was a Republican admin. taking over, Congress would have already run Geithner out of town. Since it ain’t, they won’t.

Comment by not a gator
2009-01-19 12:07:45

ashcroft got confirmed.

 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2009-01-18 07:14:17

Sorry if this if this is a double post.

Walking away: The wide and lasting impact of quitting a mortgage

By ALEJANDRO LAZO

The Washington Post

Sunday, January 18, 2009

WASHINGTON — Benjamin McNelley said he loathed the idea of walking away from the mortgage on his four-bedroom, two-bath house in Fauquier County, Va.

The former prison guard said he worried about what the decision might mean for his credit rating and whether he might still be on the hook for any outstanding debt.

But when both his father and his stepfather fell ill last summer in South Carolina, McNelley said, he had no choice but to quit his job and move. By then, the new house he had bought for $214,000 in 2003 and then refinanced twice during the boom years was worth far less than his mortgage, which exceeded $400,000. Selling the property proved difficult. He grew anxious.

With property values plummeting, real estate experts say American mortgage holders are increasingly walking away from properties - effectively choosing to have their lenders foreclose on them as a way out of the obligation - particularly when they owe more than their homes are worth. The practice is known simply as walking away or as “jingle mail,” referring to when a homeowner mails the keys back to a lender.

While there is no precise way to know how many foreclosures are due to people walking away, experts said the practice has become more common as more homeowners owe more on their mortgage than the home is worth. In some cases, homeowners can afford to keep paying but decide not to because they have little invested in the property or owe so much that they no longer see the value in continuing to pay.

“The prevailing sentiment over the last five to six years has been that a home is primarily an investment and secondarily a place to live,” said Guy Cecala, the publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance in Bethesda, Md. “If that is in fact your thinking, it makes it very difficult to make a decision to continue paying your mortgage if you don’t think that investment is going to increase over the next five years.”

 
Comment by Janet Rocha
2009-01-18 07:17:03

Most of these “Brazilians” are of Japanese descent. About 100 years ago the Japanese Government subsidised their emigation to Brazil because there wasn’t enough land for them in Japan and Brazil needed workers for the coffee plantations. The descendants of these Japanese are one of the most successful groups in Brazil . They are hard working and studious and law-abiding. Many Brazilians of Japanese descent have told me that in Japan they are discriminated against by people of their own race just because they were born in Brazil. The fact that the Japanese don’t want to mix with the Brazilian Japanese is more evidence of their own prejudices than anything else.

Comment by palmetto
2009-01-18 09:53:24

Very interesting. Thanks so much for the info, Janet. Wasn’t a president of Peru in fact Japanese?

Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-01-18 10:25:50

You’re thinking of Alberto Fujimori, who was born and raised in Lima, Peru. Equivalent to labeling the 44th U.S. president an African.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2009-01-18 13:17:24

I saw a documentary on these folks. The looked very Carioca to me, no doubt the result of generations of marrying native Brzailians.

 
 
Comment by cactus
2009-01-18 07:20:54

Many companies are stoping all 401K matches and I have noticed many employees are asking why should I contribute if I don’t even get a match anymore ( Answer tax deferred income ) , Now if my hunch is right and many folks quit the 401K program thats less cash flow for the stock market. Another big negative for stocks always go up.

Comment by combotechie
2009-01-18 07:56:01

Yep, much to the delight of contrarian investors.

Comment by waiting in_la
2009-01-18 11:51:05

+25

 
 
Comment by In Montana
2009-01-18 08:14:48

My employer started its 401k in 1998 (I’m on the 401k committee) and we never got a match. It’s still a tax shelter so you bet I took advantage of it.

If it ends up getting confiscated I’m gonna feel like a chump.

Comment by denquiry
2009-01-18 08:57:30

don’t worry…IMO…the govt will soon take all the 401K money and give you an IOU a la social security. And just wondering, just because you get a 401k statement….that doesn’t mean your money is really there….shades of madoff (madeoff).

Comment by In Montana
2009-01-18 09:40:49

ok, I feel like a chump. hope you’re happy

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by polly
2009-01-18 09:52:32

Um…you guys do realize that the government doesn’t “hold” 401(k) money in any way, right? You are just exagerating to make a joke?

401(k) money is held in some sort of trust that company sets up with a bank. Companies have been known to steal 401(k)s though I think it is harder with 401(k)s than it is with their pension plans. More like an IRA than anything CA is considering holding back. If the government was going to seize 401(k)s, they might as well just seize any old bank account, whole life insurance policy, annuity, etc.

By the way, I have been known to disagree with a lot of people around here about taxes, but I agree 100% with some of the stuff that was said yesterday about CA paying tax refunds with IOU’s rather than legal tender - that is theft, pure and simple. If they are going to do it, which would essentially make applying it against the next year’s taxes the only reasonable decision, they should at least pay interest and penalties to the people they are forcing to make loans to the government of CA (so, if you are owed $200 and can’t get it, you should get credit for $250 against the next year’s taxes). Better yet, don’t do it at all.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-01-18 10:32:32

Unfortunately, the government, or whoever holds power (such as the military), can do whatever it wants, including suspending the Constitution, declaring martial law, and seizing whatever assets it wants to. That’s the way it always has been and always will be, everywhere.

“But, but, it’s DIFFERENT here!”

 
Comment by measton
2009-01-18 13:49:29

People can vote out that gov or have riots/revolution.

 
Comment by denquiry
2009-01-18 14:51:39

401(k) money is held in some sort of trust that company sets up with a bank
—————————————————————-
with all the banks going belly up that’s a real comforting to know.

 
Comment by polly
2009-01-18 17:06:42

It’s not part of the capital assets of the bank. Taking it would require an actual felony, not just bad investment decisions.

 
 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-01-18 09:05:32

If you’re not getting a match in the 401k, then wouldn’t you be better off putting your money in a Roth IRA for future tax free withdrawals? Another added benefit of a Roth is that your able to participate in a wider range of investments options.

The suggestion above is also based on the assumption that the goverment wouldn’t change the rules down the road and make the withdrawals from a Roth IRA taxable.

Comment by Darrell in PHX
2009-01-18 10:15:02

Assuming the government won’t actually tax those Roth capital gains.

With my 401(k) or traditional IRA, I KNOW I’m not payng the tax this year.

It would take a lot more faith in the government than I have, to beleive the promise that Roth gains will never be taxed.

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-01-18 10:44:20

My thinking is that by the time I need to get to my 401k money and my IRA, the pendulum will have switched back to a low tax legislative and Executive branch at the federal level.

You guys are so conservative that you are not only resistant to change, you don’t think change will occur again and again.

We’re going through the drab gray soviet style of planned economics now. But the seeds of revolution have already been planted back in October when the Congress passed the first of the bailout bills with 9 to 1 opposition by the angry American public. In ten to fifteen years we will be rid of those socialists.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-01-18 12:24:56

Your conclusion is too optimistic. Can only come about outside the current democratic framework, and is therefore unlikely. Ask yourself, what are the politics of those who reproduce and are being reproduced? Your outcome requires civil war and/or military coup.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-01-18 13:52:45

Every generation we seem to go from one extreme to another. That was my point. It’s been 28 years since Ronald Reagan, although he said directly over and over that he is not cutting government spending, but he is for cutting the rate of increase in government spending. Most people forgot that part!

In the meantime during these drab gray soviet years, I will be happy reinvesting dividends while my stocks don’t grow.

 
Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-01-18 15:00:59

No, I think we have left the box that contains steady-state solutions. You must at least accept the possibility that this extreme will not be corrected without a blow-up that results in the elimination of most private assets, including your reinvested dividends - such as was the case in the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, Confederate States of America, just to name a few examples.

 
 
 
 
Comment by bluprint
2009-01-18 09:53:54

Answer tax deferred income

You can get the same benefit from IRA contributions with the added bonus that you have a lot more choices with regard to how those monies are invested.

Comment by polly
2009-01-18 11:23:35

Assuming you are actually eligible to make regular IRA contributions. There are restrictions.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2009-01-18 13:20:31

I mentioned a few days ago that I believe that the “temporary” elimination of 401K matches and pay cuts will become permanent.

We will be told the familiar line: “In order to remain competitve…”

 
Comment by robin
2009-01-19 00:21:57

Others that previously funded cash balance accounts (no employee contribution required) are now switching to a 401K matching program. If 90% of your employees cannot afford to contribute to an IRA, you (the employer) just saved yourself 90% while appearing to be generous!
Great strategy for employers who have employees that live paycheck-to-paycheck.

 
 
Comment by Michael Fink
2009-01-18 07:38:56

Darn it, blog ate my post.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localnews/content/business/epaper/2009/01/18/sunbiz_walkaway_0118.html

The wide and lasting impacts of walking away. No ink given to the financial harm that people will do themselves by paying several 100K more then necessary on a home for the next 25 years though. Frankly, if you’re not rich, the thought of losing 200K+ on one single transaction is just out of the question. Although some will hang on, those people will also damage themselves financially for the rest of their lives. :(

Comment by jeff saturday
2009-01-18 08:33:13

It is amazing how many people get sick after they HELLOC, There should be a warning.

SURGEON GENERAL`S WARNING
A home equity loan may cause serious illness or injury to you or your family.

“But when both his father and his stepfather fell ill last summer in South Carolina, McNelley said, he had no choice but to quit his job and move. By then, the new house he had bought for $214,000 in 2003 and then refinanced twice during the boom years was worth far less than his mortgage, which exceeded $400,000. Selling the property proved difficult. He grew anxious.”

Comment by Michael Fink
2009-01-18 10:09:14

Interesting how nobody pointed out the 200K in tax free income that this person made from HELOCing the life out of this house. Got to love those reporters.

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-01-18 13:07:08

Reporter probably doesn’t know or didn’t do the research about the 200K in tax free income.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 08:07:19

Banks to TARP donors (aka American public): “Thanks very much for donating all this money to us, but we feel no obligation whatever to loan it back to you.”

Banks buoyed by bailouts are still reluctant to lend
By Mike McIntire
NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE
2:00 a.m. January 18, 2009

As the incoming Obama administration decides how to fix the economy, the troubles of the banking system have become particularly vexing.

Congress approved the $700 billion rescue plan with the idea that banks would help struggling borrowers and increase lending to stimulate the economy, and many lawmakers want to know how the first half of that money has been spent before approving the second half. But many banks that have received bailout money so far are reluctant to lend, worrying that if new loans go bad, they will be in worse shape if the economy deteriorates.

Indeed, as mounting losses at major banks such as Citigroup and Bank of America in the past week have underscored, regulators are still searching for ways to stabilize the banking system. The Obama administration could be forced early on to come up with a systemic solution, getting bad loans off balance sheets as a way to encourage banks to begin lending, which most economists say is essential to get businesses and consumers spending again.

Individually, banks that received some of the first $350 billion from the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, have offered few details about how they plan to spend the money, and they are not required to disclose what they do with it. But in conversations behind closed doors with investment analysts, some bankers have been candid about their intentions.

At the Palm Beach Ritz-Carlton in November, John Hope III, the chairman of Whitney National Bank in New Orleans, stood before a ballroom full of Wall Street analysts and explained how his bank intended to use its $300 million in federal bailout money.

Make more loans?” Hope said. “We’re not going to change our business model or our credit policies to accommodate the needs of the public sector as they see it to have us make more loans.”

A banker is a fellow who lends you his umbrella when the sun is shining, but wants it back the minute it begins to rain.

–Mark Twain–

Comment by combotechie
2009-01-18 08:19:47

Again, cash rules. Those who need cash and can’t get it are screwed, and those with the cash get to do the screwing.

Comment by vozworth
2009-01-18 10:18:42

“There is no lack of debt that can be monetized. To think otherwise is fantasy. But there are limitations about how much the dollar can bear, which is why the banks and moneyed interests have shoved their way to the front of the line, and are gorging themselves now with a little help from their friends in the Treasury and the Fed. When the time comes they intend to throw the public agenda under the bus. Its an old script, many times performed with minor enhancements.

If the current trend continues, it will have an inflationary effect on certain financial assets and commodities, and a negative impact on the dollar. There are lags in the appearance of this, but it will come.”
-jessie

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 12:15:56

“But there are limitations about how much the dollar can bear, which is why the banks and moneyed interests have shoved their way to the front of the line, and are gorging themselves now with a little help from their friends in the Treasury and the Fed.”

Is this the rough contour of the plan?

1. Dole out TARP (Titanic asset raft program) funds to banks to enable them to stock up on the inflation-hedge analogue to the life rafts which wealthy passengers on the Titanic used to escape the sinking ship.

2. Throw anyone who is long dollar commitments but lacks access to to Fed-supplied subsidized-interest liquidity under the monetary steamroller of currency liquifaction.

There has never been a better time to be too-big-to-fail.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by vozworth
2009-01-18 14:12:29

+!

dman the filters////

 
 
Comment by measton
2009-01-18 13:53:35

It seems to me that throwing the public agenda under a buss would be extremely deflationary. Which again may be what they want, make a ton of money on the way up, have the FED bailout the portion they fail to get out before the crash then borrow a ton of money at low interest rates. Then let the country/stock market crash and buy up the pieces.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 11:59:46

Well it must be awfully nice to be a bank in line for a big chunk of the $700 bn in entitlement spending, then. I keep thinking I am over the anger phase of the housing bubble stages of grief, and then I read an article like this one which sets me off again.

I frankly don’t give a damn about the foreclosure ‘victims’ who are left twisting in the wind by the TARP’s failure to address their plights, as they brought it on themselves. But it galls me to see this ‘man bites dog’ form of bank robbery play out in plain view with full endorsement by top policy makers of both parties. What did the banks do to deserve such largess? Oh yes — they lost hundreds of billions of dollars and brought the global economy to its knees. How much more deserving of public largess can you get?

Comment by Pullthetrigger?
2009-01-18 17:56:27

+5

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2009-01-19 05:03:40

+64 trillion

 
 
Comment by bulwark
2009-01-18 23:10:10

The feds don’t need banks to make loans. They can do it directly. Why don’t they?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by hoz
2009-01-18 10:14:54

Banks do not lend in the 4th Q. It is always to risky for banks to lend in the 4th Q. Banks need cash in the 4th Q to bolster the financial picture. Banks lend from Q1 to Q3.

The more critical area that is neglected is that payrolls were met before the TARP money was released! (This was one of the governments reasons for TARP to release moneys to meet payrolls). To meet payrolls banks had to lend. There is little difference in bank lending between Q4 2007 and Q4 2008 relative to respective Q3s.

Comment by vozworth
2009-01-18 10:22:30

lets play nicey today, k.

Comment by hoz
2009-01-18 10:35:07

I’ll be nicer, can I bait anybody else ole buddy? Wanna watch the games at the Dew Drop? I’ll buy (like always fer Lars).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by vozworth
2009-01-18 10:47:40

tempting, but after I loaded up my truck with the fire-water from my last visit…I should wait till the inventory reaches the re-order point.

 
Comment by scdave
2009-01-18 11:25:17

at the Dew Drop?

Philly ??

 
Comment by vozworth
2009-01-18 12:17:49

12761 Cty Rd C & X…

 
Comment by hoz
2009-01-18 21:29:46

I have been to that Dew Drop also! That is by one of the best campgrounds. The tribute to the Passenger Pigeon overlooking the Mississippi and Wisconsin river junction. It is beautiful. SouthWestern Wisconsin. I believe there are 12,000 lakes in Wisconsin, I think there are 1200 Dew Drop Inns.

“Application for Living in Northern Wisconsin”

Favorite Tavern Name:
( ) County Trunk Bar ( ) Dew Drop Inn
( ) Deer Drop Inn ( ) Deer Droppings Inn
( ) LakeSide Supper Club ( ) LakeView Supper Club
( ) LakeWood Supper Club ( ) PineSide Supper Club
( ) PineView Supper Club ( ) PineWood Supper Club

http://monster-island.org/tinashumor/humor/wiscapp.html

I do not know a Deer Droppings Inn, but I know the rest. Other that should be included: The Last Resort, Back Acres, The Rustic Inn, The Fire Lane, Alibi’s, Walleye’s and anything with Shooter, Hunter

Wasted in Wisconsin
Notes on Wisconsin’s drinking culture, laws, news and issues

Iron County leads state in taverns per capita
By Ben Poston
Oct. 16, 2008

Iron County has the most taverns per capita in the state, according to data from the Wisconsin Department of Revenue and the U.S. Census Bureau. Many of the counties with the highest number of taverns per 10,000 residents are located in the northern part of the state and have a relatively small number of residents and an influx of tourists in the summer. Milwaukee County ranks 61st in the state with 15.3 taverns for every 10,000 residents. Note: Tavern data may be incomplete because reporting of tavern licenses by municipalities is voluntary. No data was available for Menominee County.”

(Menominee County is an Indian Reservation that would not give the time of day to the state. It also has the highest rate of problem drinkers in the state. - no jobs)

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 12:02:35

“Banks need cash in the 4th Q to bolster the financial picture.”

This is totally bogus. Only debt-beat banks would stretch themselves to the point where they are constrained from being able to make loans which might be profitable.

Comment by hoz
2009-01-18 22:23:21

Yep and as we can see from Q4 reports these fine banks are reporting large profits. Yet, they have maintained their level 1 capital ratios. 4th Q drops in lending occur to allow for Tier 1 levels to increase in case of an unexpected default that would bring the bank below requirements. Year end hits are the worst in a defaulting market.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by scdave
2009-01-18 10:15:00

A banker is a fellow who lends you his umbrella when the sun is shining, but wants it back the minute it begins to rain ??

Pirates in brick ships….

 
Comment by Anon In DC
2009-01-18 12:13:56

Hi. I tried to comment on this on the NYT site. No comment section yet. The NYT, the reporter and apparently some of Congress (what’s new) is very confused. The TARP is to save the banking infrastructure by shoring up the bank balance sheets and secondary to save the shareholders many of whom are pension funds such as CALPERS. The banks loaning money to those who can’t repay is what caused this problem. Of course the banks are not repeating that anytime sooon. Guess the dimmer witted of the Congress critters thought they were buying votes by bailing out FBs and credit card junkies.

 
Comment by Pullthetrigger?
2009-01-18 17:11:19

The government should STOP bailouts of corporations and make more “stimulus” payments. If everyone received 10K in dollars, they would pay down debt, and buy stuff! And we wouldn’t need to bail out the banks or car companies. This is getting me really piss*d! I mean if we’re going to print money and give it away, for f*ck’s sake, let’s give it to those who will spend it more prudently than the banksters, with their CEO salaries and bonuses for crap sake! Anybody with me here?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 08:23:04

We are all Keynesians again.

Dean Calbreath: Roundtable squares off over future of economy
2:00 a.m. January 18, 2009

When San Diego County launched its annual Economic Roundtable 25 years ago, it was during the Reagan era, when “big government” was deemed the enemy of economic growth. Deregulation, tax cuts and government downsizing were the order of the day.

But when the county staged its 25th roundtable Friday, the consensus was that the only thing that can stave off economic collapse is massive government intervention, combined with re-regulation and perhaps even (at least according to one speaker) a bit more taxation.

 
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2009-01-18 08:38:38

Here’s an article from today’s Charlotte Observer.

What happens when the lights go out
Hathaway Hills can’t afford to keep the streetlights on. In the dark, there have been more break-ins. Now a neighbor is dead.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/local/story/480205.html

Comment by scdave
2009-01-18 10:18:12

I smell a lawsuit coming….

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2009-01-18 08:43:38

So, I do many things, but one of them is audio/music production. I decided to try out some free apps for my work PC, so I can mess around on the road. I cannot believe the quality and quantity of free plugins and whatnot for all of this stuff. If you can navigate the spyware minefield, you can download some serious audio tools.

When I was a teen, this stuff cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, and well trained people to operate. A kid with a junk PC and internet connection can crank out genius tunes.

Kinda crazy…

Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-01-18 10:52:52

Yup, it’s amazing all right.

The steady increase in processing power doesn’t hurt, either. I remember the days when you’d try to play 10-12 simultaneous tracks, add some effects, and the whole ship would go down trying to process the effects in realtime …

Know any audio engineers, though? The dudes with the fancy live rooms and high overhead are finding it increasingly difficult to make a go of it, in large part because of the leveling of the playing field. It’s a tough business.

Ah, one RE-related thing: Steve Albini’s studio (he owns the building, too) is about a mile from my house. I was there once for a recording session, but not with him, and only in the B room. It’s a very nice studio, as you might imagine.

When he built out the studio, the area was a somewhat desolate light industrial / warehouse area. Fast-forward through the boom: The studio is now literally surrounded by condos. Across the street is a half-arsed, gated, inward-facing micro-community of townhouses. Gah.

Comment by Bub Diddley
2009-01-18 13:00:08

The technology is getting cheaper and cheaper. You could set up a perfectly acceptable home studio for relatively cheap now (esp compared to what the equivalent would have cost a decade ago). Having a “project studio” used to be more for tech nerds and audio engineering types, but now the average musician is much more able to record his own stuff. It’s not the equipment, but having the home to put it in that got impossible for the average musician!

I’m hoping that will change. Reading this blog has largely killed any desire to own a home, except for one thing - it’s pretty hard to record live drums in an apartment.

I remember when house parties with bands playing were a common occurrence. 50 people drinking keg beer in plastic cups on the lawn…pull the couch out of the living room and throw a mattress up against the door…good times. It doesn’t seem possible that not long ago there were CHEAP HOUSES everywhere that made this sort of thing common. A decade ago I was in a band that played more house parties than they did “real” gigs in clubs, and they were more fun, too. I know it still happens, but not with nearly the frequency that it used to. The typical three slacker dudes who would split the rent on a cheap house and host these kind of shenanigans would get end up being kicked out so some granite countertops could get put in and the house could get flipped.

Amazing, when you think about it, how the housing bubble managed to permeate every facet of American life over the past decade.

Comment by Muggy
2009-01-18 17:44:33

I’d love to continue this conversation another day. But yes, much to respond to…

I love Albini, he hoarded 2-inch tape as manufacturers went out of business. I read an interview where he got crazy mad talking about all these engineers contacting him for tape. “I’m not a tape salesman!!”

The bubble has permeated music in so many ways. All that… house parties, studios, heck, all art.

What I miss the most is mid-size, regional clubs. They are dead. It’s either the corner of an Irish pub or the Ford Amphitheater. And yes, I miss the days of the house parties and bands. Those were all over Rochester, everywhere.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by CA renter
2009-01-19 05:16:10

I remember when house parties with bands playing were a common occurrence. 50 people drinking keg beer in plastic cups on the lawn…pull the couch out of the living room and throw a mattress up against the door…good times.
————————

Back in the 80s, we used to call them “helicopter parties” because the LAPD would send out their helicopters to chase the the kids away. We used to get hundreds of kids in a SFH/yard and surrounding streets. You know you had a really good party when they sent two helicopters. ;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Meow
2009-01-18 17:42:37

Related to Albini–I used to see Todd Trainer out w/ his Italian greyhound and it was spooky how much they looked like one another. Now the last time I spotted him out was at the State Fair.

I suspect we have a similar musical past ET (in my mind you were the one to comment on the Fugazi reference someone made). Now I am old enough that I only drag myself out for a few shows a year.

And, for bands that record at home I recommend “The Handsome Family” (formerly of Chicago). Most of their old stuff was recorded in their living room, but now I think they have upgraded to the garage.

 
 
 
Comment by ann gogh
2009-01-18 08:45:10

My dream lastnight about me in a builder’s office.
I ordered a two bedroom condo and I looked out the window and the entire county of san diego was filled in with condo towers from mexico to orange county.

If they put people to work in LA what will they knock down to put up more buildings and bridges. There is no room for change.

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-01-18 12:26:38

What a nightmare! And then you woke up and were relieved it wasn’t true…
Oh, wait.

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-01-18 13:13:42

LOL. :)

 
 
 
Comment by Jobs_BackToUSA
2009-01-18 08:53:03

Just curious that how come all these consultants working for Accenture, Bearing Point, E&Y, Deloitte etc. are getting huge salaries? They are still working on projects and claiming average $150K salary.

These companies have ripped off the Govt. by charging like $400-$500 per hour for services of these consultants in the past 7-8 years. And a lot of consultants have been imported from outside, trained in India for 4 weeks and placed on projects.
They get all good benefits, hotels, and travel.

I’m not sure how come this lavish sub-contracting has been going on for years and years. Under Bush it rose to $400 billion as compared to $15 billion under Reagan.

What is the future of these consultants on L-1/H-1 visas?

Comment by Martin
2009-01-18 14:33:44

My neighbor is also a consultant with Deloitte. He goes Monday morning and comes back thursday night. All flight and hotel paid for by Deloitte. He just used his hotel points to buy a nice Sony camcorder.

Anyway, he has a BA degree and did some one month course in Oracle Financials and is now paid $145K plus per diem. He bought 2 houses in the past few years and is making payments on both.

I feel that I went to college, got my PhD and still I make close to $90K working in Research. he did BA and 4 week trg. and making almost double of what I make. And he is almost 15 years younger to me.

Maybe this whole consulting thing is also a bubble that will go away after Bush leaves office. Why do companies or govt. not hire direct employees instead of paying $400 per hour to these consulting companies. Who justifies these kind of rates? Or is this also a cartel?

 
Comment by Bad Chile
2009-01-18 14:48:14

Delotte does my taxes (paid for by my employer - I earn income frequently in multiple countries as a worker in those countries).

My two cents? Deloitte sucks. It took four tries to get my state income taxes done well enough that I could scribble through a couple numbers and correct the errors. This was after the first two tries following which Deloitte sent a previous iteration of my return to the state, failing to send one with the correct information.

I was quite ticked off about it considering I wasted years getting an engineering education to turn around and be an engineer. I could be working for Deloitte right now making twice the money instead with far less liability and doing a far better job than any of their employees.

 
 
Comment by grubner
2009-01-18 08:57:45

http://tinyurl.com/8bfle3

from the wa-po

The Growing Foreclosure Crisis

One oft-repeated assertion no longer holds true. Those in trouble are not, primarily, lower-income borrowers. The foreclosure crisis has become a wave, afflicting neighborhoods of every stripe

But interviews and a Washington Post analysis of available data show that the foreclosure crisis knows no class or income boundaries. Many borrowers ensnared in the evolving mortgage mess do not fit neatly into the stereotypes that surfaced by early 2007 when delinquency rates shot up. They don’t have subprime loans, the lending industry’s jargon for the higher-rate mortgages made to borrowers with shaky credit or without enough cash for a down payment.

The wave of subprime delinquencies appears to have crested. But in October, for the first time, the number of prime mortgages in delinquency exceeded the subprime loans in danger of default, according to The Post’s analysis.

There a lot of good stuff in this article.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 12:04:56

FIve detailed pages of delicious housing market bear food — yum yum!!!

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-01-18 12:57:43

Super article! Thanks for the link.

It was all good reading. A few things stood out to me:
(from the article)
‘Federal regulators recently held a one-day seminar in Riverside for troubled IndyMac customers interested in a loan modification. About 4,200 were invited. Only 250 showed up, half of whom probably will not qualify for a more affordable loan.’

‘Already, 24 percent of option ARMs were at least two months late in September, up from 5 percent a year ago, said Mahesh Swaminathan, a Credit Suisse mortgage strategist. “We’re seeing delinquencies rise even before the recast date has hit,” Swaminathan said. “After the recasts, the weakness will increase. In 2010 and 2011, the recasts will peak.”

Wow. This is gonna’ get SO much worse…

Comment by NoSingleOne
2009-01-18 15:37:09

Hi Oly,

Things are going to get much worse here in Alaska. I can smell the desperation of my neighbors. “For Sale” signs are popping up like mushrooms on a dead log even in the cold dead of winter. My RE agent, who argued that “we’re different here” is now saying that we’ll have ponies and rainbows because mortgage rates are so low. It’s always a good time to buy!

Me? I’m just happy that I can afford to pay off my mortgage in 5 yrs or so (easily), have a stable job, and I’m mostly content with living in Alaska. The dog and I get along pretty well, and the house is coming together nicely. I’m going to try to enjoy what is likely the stupidest financial decision of my life because it’s still better for me psychologically than prolonging 40 years of delayed gratification, and I still like this place far better than the rentals and foreclosures I’ve seen so far. It is without question the coolest place I’ve ever lived :)

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-01-18 19:17:21

NoSingleOne, where is Alaska are you?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-01-18 15:25:53

…The excess money they owe is added to their balance so that they owe more than they borrowed on the house. Fitch Ratings expects monthly payments to jump 63 percent on average (or $1,053) on loans adjusting in 2009 and 2010, which will undoubtedly cause a rise in defaults.

I wonder if the messiah will get behind a new law to nullify contract law and keep the adjusted rate artificially low for these greedy buyers?

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 16:48:03

Would that be Constitutional? (He would know, being a Constitutional scholar.)

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 16:38:20

Diolinda Igma, a real estate agent in Riverside County, went through this calculation before she and her husband, who works for a public utility, stopped making payments on their Moreno Valley home. They were underwater on their adjustable-rate mortgage, due to reset in 2010.

Because most lenders will not modify a loan until the borrower has missed payments, Igma said she fell behind to get her lender’s attention. “I had to be practical,” she said. “Why wait for 2010? Why keep putting money into a house we’ll lose?”

Uh, to avoid throwing away money on rent???

The Igmas took out two loans to buy their $437,000 house. The second enabled them to buy without putting money down.

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-01-19 12:33:22

“It turned out to be a risky decision. What galls the Bohnens is that they brought $233,000 to the table when they bought the house — cash they had pulled out of their previous home, which was under contract for sale. But the sale fell apart just before the scheduled closing date, and while the agent was confident of finding a new buyer at the time, the house never sold. It is now in foreclosure.”

No mercy.

 
 
Comment by WAman
2009-01-18 09:06:23

There has been a lot of talk about entitlement spending. I have an idea that just may work. First we should take away the spending caps on Social Security - it is not fair that some people stop paying that tax with their first paycheck of the year. Then we could probably lower the tax rate on Social Security to 6% or under.

What do you think?

Comment by Darrell in PHX
2009-01-18 10:27:47

We’d have to lift the cap on contributions, without lifting the corresponding cap on benefits.

More importantly, why is it just a payroll tax? On my salary, I pay 25% marginal + 7.6% payroll + my employer pays another 7.6% which directly reduces the amount they are willing to pay me.

40%+ state income tax.

Compare to capital gains. 15% federal income tax and 0% Social Security and Medicare.

I think it is time to just roll it all into income tax, and then raise the tax rate on all capital gains to exactly match income tax.

Of course, we don’t actually want people to realize the marginal rate many of us are paying! I get a reaise, and 40+% goes directly to the government (close to 50% if we count the employeer match).

While we’re at it, let’s get rid of the mortgage interest deduction. I pay more income tax because I was smart enough to not overpay for a house, and was smart enough toget a great sub-5% interest rate???? Why shold I have to send 30% of my savings I get from being prudent, to the government?

Comment by CA renter
2009-01-19 05:21:37

Agree 100%!

 
 
Comment by scdave
2009-01-18 10:32:02

it is not fair that some people stop paying that tax

IMO, Taxing income is not the way to go….Taxing consumption on a progressive basis is a better idea…

Comment by Darrell in PHX
2009-01-18 12:25:33

black market

 
 
Comment by exeter
2009-01-18 12:24:23

WAman, lifting the cap achieves two important things. First, it puts fairness back into the equation. Why is it that Buffet, Gates and the rest of the big money ilk pay the same into SS as I do? It’s outrageously unfair. Second, it re-establishes funding for SS and empowers those administering SS to lower the rate.

Comment by bluprint
2009-01-18 13:45:58

Aren’t SS benefits ultimately tied to contributions? If BG paid in 6.5% of his income into SS what kind of payments would he get at the end, 10s of thousands of dollars?

Seems an absurd revolving door of money at that point.

Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-01-18 14:12:46

No, SS monthly payout is capped at a relatively low payout.

In general, there is little relationship between lifetime contributions and payout. You live 1 year or 40 after benefits start, it’s all the same - you get paid your rate. SS is essentially a compulsory Ponzi welfare scheme, and Congress decides who gets what. Even more fundamentally, it is just a renaming and hiding of part of the federal income tax structure, and in that sense, it is the one tax that penalizes the lower incomes relative to the higher.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-01-18 14:03:15

“Outrageously unfair” is a subjective political opinion. Many people would be more inclined to base fairness on whether one takes more than one puts in - for example, old people and the recently dead could be considered to be taking/have taken an outrageously unfair reward from social security relative to young workers, a la early investors with Signore Ponzi.

Also, unrelatedly, Buffett and Gates would still pay relatively little SS even without caps, since their earned income is modest.

Comment by Darrell in PHX
2009-01-18 14:34:15

Which is why ALL income should be treated equally.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Blano
2009-01-18 13:10:53

Just lift the caps and be done with it.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-01-18 14:21:41

History channel has a special on now about Bonnie and Clyde and Machine Gun Kelly. Their heyday was during the GD. The narrator was mentioning that wealthy people were scared. Some words to the effect that displaying wealth made you a good target for folks like Machine Gun Kelly.

I’ll keep my economy car, apartment, and blue jeans!

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-01-18 19:14:53

A lot of kidnappings were going on during the time of Bonnie, Clyde and Machine Gun Kelly.

 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-01-18 15:07:33

Say, what’s going on in Iceland? Are they all out fishing now that no one wants their colored paper stuff and their banks went bust? Eating each other? I haven’t heard much about that situation lately.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-01-18 15:41:35

Generally, when stories fall from the headlines that means whatever problem existed, has been solved. Kinda like a war I once remember hearing about alot.

Of course the converse is also true. Problems don’t exist until they are reported in the headlines. Kinda like this housing bubble thingy.

 
Comment by Darrell in PHX
2009-01-18 16:10:19

Unemployment up 45% month over month…

From just over 4K to just under 8K…. Yes, 8K unemployed. I guess that is what you get in a nation with 300,000 people.

Their economy is fishing and aluminum smelting. Aluminum prices off 50% in the last 6 months. That will leave a mark.

Comment by Darrell in PHX
2009-01-18 16:59:57

Oh… with a 50% drop in the Krona, they are still selling for the same Krona value. Too bad all imports have doubled in price.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-01-18 16:15:36

By Mr Trout’s account, they have reverted from banking to fishing.

Wall Street Journal

* OCTOBER 10, 2008

As Banking ‘Fairy Tale’ Ends, Iceland Looks Back to the Sea
By CHARLES FORELLE
[Icelanders Look Back to Sea Amid Crisis] Getty Images

Boxes of fish are stored for export in Reykjavik.

THINGEYRI, Iceland — Kristjan Davidsson went to sea as a deckhand at 16. At fisheries college he aspired to be a boat captain. For two decades, he sold fish and fish-processing equipment. Like his father, and practically everyone in this remote village, he owed his living to the fish his country pulled from the ocean.

But in 2001 Mr. Davidsson got bored. He joined one of Iceland’s newly privatized banks. He got rich. Now, he says, it looks like it’s back to fish. That may be true for this nation’s fortunes as a whole.

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-01-18 18:27:47

Thank you!

 
 
 
Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-01-18 15:37:59

Datum: Country with out-of-control government spending achieves 31% inflation for 2008 despite declining output.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/28699639

Comment by Darrell in PHX
2009-01-18 16:39:19

By putting the money into the hands of the people. The money is being given to the population that is not already burried in debt.

In the U.S. the majority of the money is being given to Wall Street to ensure billionaires remain billionaires. And, whatever is given to the little people will just be used to pay down debts.

U.S. is in total debt collapse mode!

Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-01-18 17:14:39

Good point. But eventually the U.S. spending model should more closely approximate the Venezuelan one, which is why I can not be a long-term deflationista.

Comment by Darrell in PHX
2009-01-18 19:31:51

I’m not a long-term deflationist either. Just the next 2-3 years as $15 trillion of debt defaults, resulting in $7-10 trillion in real losses.

Massive oversupply of everything, demand crashing, downward wage preasure, and lots and lots of people that thought they were rich will find out that they are not.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ButImNotDeadYet
2009-01-19 00:29:40

I went to the grocery store again last night. Still no signs of deflation. I found a few good sales on cereal, which I scarfed up (I have two teenagers). I noted the Little Debbie Honey Buns, which two years ago could be bought for $1.06 a pack are down to $1.39 now (peaked at $1.46 a couple of months ago).

Produce prices are high and seem to be going higher. I continue to note examples of package size changes, which gives the illusion of price stability when in fact it is inflationary. Down-sizing a 12-pack of oatmeal to a 10-pack while keeping the price the same. Same goes for cereal in 12-oz boxes now when it used to be 14 or 15 oz’s.

I’m buying more and more generic brands to keep costs under control. Man, this deflation is killing me…

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-01-19 12:41:23

cold temps have raised produce prices.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by waiting in_la
2009-01-18 16:59:18

Hey Guys,

For those involved in my ‘Uncle Story’ from yesterday, me reposes to your questions posted late last night, in yesterday’s bits bucket.

I wouldn’t mind continuing the discussion here, if anyone has anything else to add, or any advice.

ahansen - you asked me to contact you off the blog, but I am not sure how to reach you. I have photos from our LA hbb get together last summer, by the way. I have never posted them anywhere.

 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-01-18 17:15:00

Jan. 19 (Bloomberg) — Four years after Ukraine embraced the West with the election of President Viktor Yushchenko in the Orange Revolution, the former Soviet nation’s economy is collapsing and investors expect the country to default.

Yields on Ukraine’s $105 billion of government and company bonds are the highest of any country with dollar-denominated debt except Ecuador, which defaulted in December. The currency, the hryvnia, weakened 40 percent in the past 12 months against the dollar. The benchmark stock index lost 85 percent, the biggest drop in the world after Iceland….

Comment by vozworth
2009-01-18 17:40:47

The inevitable bust is proving epic. Latvia’s property group Balsts says Riga flat prices have fallen 56pc since mid-2007. The economy contracted 18pc annualised over the last six months.

 
 
Comment by hoz
2009-01-18 20:37:39

Now the curse of the NY Giants can be lifted and the stock market in the US can rally.

(See S&P500 when the NY Giants when the Super Bowl, 1987, 1991 and 2008)

I know what happens when the Steelers win, but what happens if the Cardinals win? The last time the Cardinals won the country was in WWII.

lol

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2009-01-18 20:39:35

Financial burden of homeownership spread unequally

By ALAN ZIBEL
AP Real Estate Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) — When it comes to homeownership, Hispanics in New Jersey, single parents in California and senior citizens in Rhode Island all have something in common: More than a third have an unaffordable mortgage.

Inequality in America has traditionally followed familiar patterns of race, age and education. Those long-standing gaps have been magnified by the real estate boom and now the historic bust, according to an Associated Press analysis of 2007 Census Bureau data.

While minorities have made significant gains in wealth and home ownership since 1990, “things are going into reverse gear,” and now the homeownership rate for blacks and Hispanics is falling, said Edward Wolff, a New York University economist who studies income and wealth distribution.

 
Comment by cobaltblue
2009-01-18 20:45:12

“AP
Report: New York to lead US cities in job losses”

Couldn’t happen to a more deserving bunch.

I don’t know about everybody else, but I’ve grown really sick and tired of the NYC financial “experts” running their freeloading games at everyone else’s expense.

Dragging these idiots out of their skyscraper offices, heels first, down the emergency stairs and into the street for an extremely prejudiced and speedy trial by their victims - that sounds good about right now.

But I suppose just knowing they have no more “job” is an O.K. consolation prize.

Maybe I’m just getting crabby.

 
Comment by hoz
2009-01-18 21:33:27

The real price of oil. Cushing (NYMEX) may be saturated, but LA crude is trading at $54.

Some prices from around the world

http://www.upstreamonline.com/market_data/?id=markets_crude

 
Comment by hoz
2009-01-18 22:02:10

While watching positions and reading news caught this typical item.

“…Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. (9107) is likely to see its profit slide 32% to about 85 billion yen, a bigger drop than forecast. It will be the first pretax decline since fiscal 2002 for Mitsui O.S.K. Lines and the first since fiscal 2006 for Nippon Yusen and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha….

However, the stock prices of these companies have already taken a beating, with P/E multiples (uncertainty about the “E” nothwithstanding) trading between 3X and 5X+ forward earnings, and PBRs below 1.0X, while ROE is between 18% and 31%…”

Buying stock in profitable companies with no debt or buy in the US stock market?

40% of all Japanese fund investors closed their account last year as of last week “deposits are now JPY190.7 trillion for Japanese banks” about JPY180T in Japan Post and about JPY300T in Foreign banks in Japan. That is a lot of money sitting on the side. a 1yr CD in Japan yields 0.10%.

I don’t care about the US market, but this is setting the stage for the largest bull market in decades in Japan.

Comment by hoz
2009-01-18 22:36:54

As to how long the crisis would continue, Buffett said he didn’t know.

“In the end,” Buffett says, “since 1776 it’s never paid to bet against America.”

from Mr. Charles Beard
“We forget that when our government was established the principle of majority rule was nowhere to recognized—that until well along in the nineteenth century the majority of our forefathers did not even have the right to vote…”

and then we gave the vote to women and it has been down hill ever since. (Just kidding fair dames)

Comment by bkiddo
2009-01-19 08:47:24

Hoz I almost always agree with your posts and have learned alot about economics and investing from you.
That comment was not funny, at all.
Just don’t get me started about how women are still treated, worldwide. Rant off

 
 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post

  • The Housing Bubble Blog
  • The Housing Bubble Blog