February 8, 2009

Bits Bucket For February 8, 2009

Please visit the HBB Forum. Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

281 Comments »

Comment by IMOUTOFHERE
2009-02-08 06:46:40

I’m refinancing our house right now and got the appraisal back this week. The value is down 2% from 2 years ago when it was last appraised and I’M ECSTATIC!

Comment by Ol'Bubba
2009-02-08 07:04:50

What market are you in?

Comment by jeff saturday
2009-02-08 09:00:12

Mars

Comment by polly
2009-02-08 09:41:00

Oooo….do we have a troll?

Please note that the fact that a it is plausible (whether actually true or not) to have a troll who claims their house is down 2% is major progress from the recent past. Old style trolls would have said it was up 20%.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by drumminj
2009-02-08 10:28:23

To be fair, my former house in Austin, TX would fit this bill. Truth is there are some markets (not necessarily city-wide, but based on neighborhood/location) where this is feasible.

I think y’all are too eager to call out a troll to feast on.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 11:29:49

I think the trolls are back — YUM YUM :-)

 
Comment by reuven
2009-02-08 12:16:01

Remember the Sopranos when they beat the crap of the the appraiser? Maybe our new poster used that tactic!

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-08 14:57:42

Come on HBBers bring out the knives. Let’s cut, slice and dice. :)

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2009-02-08 17:22:26

Shhhhhh! Let’s lure Troll Boy into a false sense of security. It’s been so long since we’ve had any genuine trolls to bash. Show polite interest. Get him to go into full flight about how the bottom is in and now is a great time to buy. Then we’ll pounce and evicerate him.

 
 
Comment by Northeastener
2009-02-08 11:45:14

Massachusetts housing price gains and losses, 2007-8

Notice a few areas have significant increases in median prices from 2007 to 2008. Cambridge is one… Marion, Westin, and Amherst are others…

I can’t say what is driving the increase in prices (or in some cases a flattening of prices) except to say the communities in question all have high average incomes and qualities that people are willing to pay a premium for, whether a proximity to Boston and it’s Universities, quality of life, etc.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2009-02-08 12:19:26

8649 Uranus Ter
Lake Park, FL 33403 $85,000
2 Bed, 2 Bath, 1,605 Sq Ft
Property Type: Condo/Townhome/Row Home/Co-Op

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by IMOUTOFHERE
2009-02-08 12:19:43

Not sure what happened to my reply, so I’ll try again.

First, I’m hardly a troll. I’ve monitored and posted on this board for 2+ years, and began to seriously question what was going on in RE back in 2005.

I’m in East Texas (alright, no snickering!) and about as far from bubble land as you can get. How far? A co-worker let me know that she has a good recipe for squirrel. We do have a “mall” which you would laugh at, a movie theatre with only 6 screens, and within a 35 mile radius there is ONE restaurant that uses cloth napkins.

Median income here is very low, but you can still buy a house in this area for 3X income. It might be a manufactured house on 3 acres, but it’s not like you have to go to some hell hole of a neighbor hood.

As for our house, the same appraisor who did the original appraisal did the second one as well. The mortgage broker (ex-California MB) gave her “the number” to hit, and the appraisor literally had a fit. Never worked that way, never will. An honest appraisor, how quaint!

We live in a very desirable area and the appraisor did say that our particular area did become a little overheated and needs to come down some. She said listings are now taking 3~6 months to sell whereas it was less than 3 months before.

We came here from southern California. We listed our house there in mid 2006 for 1.25M. We cut the price in 25K whacks every week or so until we sold it at the end of the year for “only” 995. The realtor who listed it for us thought I was absolutely nuts and “gave it away”. Today, Zillow has it valued at 885, so who’s nuts again?

So ya, my house lost 2%, and I’M HAPPY ABOUT IT!

Comment by exeter
2009-02-08 12:44:00

Give the asynchronous characteristics and geographical nuance of housing price structure, I’ll wager you won’t be beating the happy drum any time in the future but do drum away for now. It’s quite entertaining.

 
Comment by polly
2009-02-08 13:16:45

I fyou got out of CA with such a huge payday, why do you even have a mortgage to refinance in East Texas?

Comment by IMOUTOFHERE
2009-02-08 14:39:33

The payday wasn’t that large, and either is the mortgage. The difference sits in a CD that was taken out before Bernanke declared war on savers. The rate on the CD is more than my new note.

I would have been happy to rent and banked the whole thing but the spouse has a very strong nesting instinct and after 30+ years you learn somethings aren’t worth fighting for.

I expected the value would go down and was bracing for much worse. That’s what promted the post in the first place.

It will probably go down some more, but as values here never got crazy relative to income, it will probably decline at a rate similar the rate of decline in income. Other markets have to deal with both an adjustment to a more reasonable multiple of income, and to falling income.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2009-02-08 17:26:32

So what you’re saying is, “It’s different here.” I see.

(OK HBBers. Very nonchalantly begin reaching for your clubs. Keep them hidden behind your back. No sudden movements till I give the signal.)

 
Comment by IMOUTOFHERE
2009-02-08 18:15:13

So what your saying is “all markets are the same”. I see.

 
 
 
 
Comment by waiting in_la
2009-02-08 16:07:07

hahahaha … LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

okay, dude.

Comment by waiting in_la
2009-02-08 16:11:30

sorry - posted this before I read the retort. :@

Comment by IMOUTOFHERE
2009-02-08 16:22:10

Apology accepted.

If you really are ‘waiting in LA’ and want to buy a house there your waiting will be rewarded. I just hope things don’t go “Rodney King” before then.

Seriously. IOU’s from the state? Workers taking a forced day off with out pay? Talk about fiddling while Rome burns.

Take care.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2009-02-08 06:49:39

Hey you guys, I need some reinforcements over at mises dot org and organizationsandmarkets dot com. Everybody there is going on about how megacorps are such great capitalist icons, and if we just continue to let the free market set CEO pay then everything will be fine.

Comment by nhz
2009-02-08 06:56:24

what free market? is there any free market left in the US (or other anglosaxon countries, for that matter)?

Comment by combotechie
2009-02-08 07:00:26

Ebay, craiglist, yard sales, swap meets, farmers markets. Free markets, yes?

Comment by palmetto
2009-02-08 07:40:58

You can scratch ebay off that list. It is hardly a “free” market. Sellers are not allowed to take paper payments, can’t defend themselves against dishonest buyers, Paypal can hold payments indefinitely, their search function is a travesty, favoring huge sellers like “Buy.com”, who have cut a deal with Ebay. Ebay can also advertise on your selling pages, for which people pay to list. Oh, yeah, I think ebay got some TARP funds because of Paypal, which is a total shakedown. I haven’t bought or sold there in ages.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by combotechie
2009-02-08 07:43:26

Oh.

 
Comment by denquiry
2009-02-08 07:48:50

I got ripped off on ebay (I paid for merchandise that I never received) and ebay could have cared the f*ck less.

 
Comment by cactus
2009-02-08 09:06:33

You can scratch ebay off that list. It is hardly a “free” market.

yea thats too bad it was kind of fun selling stuff back in 2006

 
Comment by palmetto
2009-02-08 09:21:09

“yea thats too bad it was kind of fun selling stuff back in 2006″

Exactly. It was a blast. But Donahoe and other members of upper management just couldn’t have people having a good time. Donahoe is one of the most incompetent CEOs ever. And yet the shareholders let him continue in place. I’ve never seen a CEO ruin a company so fast, in less than a year. But I had his number when I saw one of his photographs with his pursey lips locked in a phoney smile.

Ebay’s a joke. Its customers are treated worse than employees and pay for the privilege.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-08 10:35:41

I used to get stamps on ebay about 2 years ago. I like stamps a lot. These weren’t fancy or costly stamps, just more or less modern topicals, so only a few bucks for a little packet of 100 or so, and you could paw through them exclaiming over the pretty little stamps. It was great fun. First the pawing, then sorting into little piles, which would get blown over like confetti and become disarranged and I’d shout angrily, and then I’d pick a matching set or two to arrange within a little frame.
They make great presents, a little framed set that matches someone’s interests, like my friend Bonnie likes orchids, another friend is a port guy so I gave him quite a nice arrangement of ship stamps. Stamps are super!

Oh, but I started to say that I don’t use ebay much anymore. Partly because of the stuff Palmy was grumbling about, and also because I have enough stamps to last me. (for at least 100 years.)
I still use them for books, now and then.

 
Comment by WAman
2009-02-08 11:28:02

As an Ebay seller since 2002 I can tell you that I think they killed the egg laying golden goose. The fees are outrageous making it no longer profitable to do business.

 
Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-08 11:46:50

I’ve only sold a few things on Ebay. To me, it was a hassle. Admittedly, I’m not brimming with patience, but to have to photograph, upload, and describe each item, then ship it in addition to paying Ebay is more headache than it’s worth.

After hearing how they raised prices dramatically, and are mistreating their customers, methinks they’ll find out the hard way that you really can’t bring back all those jilted merchants. Here’s hoping they implode.

 
Comment by reuven
2009-02-08 12:19:52

I go through a lot of evaluation equipment in my consulting business, and I used to sell it on eBay, just to reclaim some money when I was done.

It got so overrrun with scamsters, I just stopped doing it, and now just bring the stuff to the electronics recycling or the dump. I just didn’t have the time dealing with all the scamsters who would try to contact sellers, or competing against pirated/counterfeit goods.

 
Comment by desertdweller
2009-02-08 18:19:54

Ebay was so much fun in the beginning.
Went to eBay U in Vegas - 1999 or 2k and
it was free.They had 4 seminars and free pens and stuff. Then years later it was a pain in the ass and now they charge to attend U.
I bought/sold lots of stuff but no mas.

I have a few sellers that I keep in contact with, if ever I really want to buy something..it is privately. I trust them and vice versa.

 
 
Comment by VirginiaTechDan
2009-02-08 07:42:54

Just try to issue your own currency, sell your own milk to a neighbor, generate power for yourself and and your neighbors without using the power grid, start your own insurance company, etc. Just about every business idea where I see heavy demand that I could potentially meet, I am stopped dead in my tracks by government regulation and the threat of going to jail.

The things you mentioned above represent such a small part of the economy that it hardly counts.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-02-08 07:53:46

There’s a difference between a free market and an anarchist market. One has rules.

 
Comment by scdave
2009-02-08 09:18:16

stopped dead in my tracks by government regulation and the threat of going to jail ??

Amen to that V-Dan…

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-02-08 10:13:34

Bingo. It kills me when you hear people say “our capitalistic society failed” and they prescribe more controls.

 
Comment by SUGuy
2009-02-08 11:19:11

I run a manufacturing/ franchising company in NYS. We follow our own guidelines just to survive with less head aches.

We try our best to stay under the radar screen, hire top notch law firms to defend trivial stuff and pay thru the nose. We try to stay ahead of the regulations and the Govt agencies find stupid ways to fine us which we willingly pay knowing very well that they are wrong. We see it as a nuisance value. Our tax filings are done ahead of time and we try to contribute to the local establishments. Our HR directors main job is protecting the company from frivolous law suits, and avoid hiring sue happy employees. On top of all this the state taxes us heavily. To survive in business you need a thick skin, willing to battle often and put out fires. I dream when one day we will be able to shut down the plant or outsource it which will reduce our anxiety/fear and hopefully increase life expectancy.

To those of you who claim to want to bring manufacturing jobs back to the US I say good luck. YOU DO IT. The govt will kill your sprit and I am speaking from almost 23 years of experience.

 
Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-08 11:51:57

“Bingo. It kills me when you hear people say “our capitalistic society failed” and they prescribe more controls.”

So, then, it was too much regulation which caused this whole financial crisis? Nice try!

 
Comment by VirginiaTechDan
2009-02-08 12:42:59

BanteringBear,
In a manner of speaking yes. The “regulations” that created this mess are the “regulations” that created the federal reserve and defined the FDIC, etc. These regulations created moral hazards which required other regulations such as the SEC which caused individuals to do less due diligence, etc.

In order to regulate something you have to *own* something. If you don’t own it then you cannot regulate it without violating someone’s property rights. If you attempt to “regulate without owning” then the “owner” is freed from all other obligations so long as he followed the “regulations”. Regulations create a HUGE liability on the taxpayer if when the regulations fail.

The market needs more self-regulation (by putting risks/rewards where the market puts them). Government regulation undermines the natural risk/reward regulation and creates a game for con-men to play where they can privatize the profits and socialize the losses without risk so long as they “play by the regulations”.

 
Comment by exeter
2009-02-08 12:46:27

+eleventy zillion.

 
Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-08 13:18:43

Nonsense, VirginiaTechDan. We need more oversight of current regulations and, quite apparently, more regulation.

 
Comment by bluprint
2009-02-08 13:39:14

it was too much regulation which caused this whole financial crisis?

Sure as aych-ee double hockey sticks had a whole lot to do with it.

corporations - a statist construct
Federal reserve/central monetary system - state construct
Fannie Mae, FredMc, FHA, SEC, CRA - state, state, state, state and state
HUD,VA - state, state
Legitimized, licensed realtors - state
legitimized, licensed contractors - state
below-market interest rates - state

Maybe the state will save us. lmao

 
Comment by exeter
2009-02-08 14:15:32

“corporations - a statist construct”

Preach it Brother.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2009-02-08 15:12:30

Yeah, profit motivated people will regulate themselves.

Seriously? I think I broke a rib laughing so hard.

You cannot possibly be that naive.

 
Comment by bluprint
2009-02-08 15:22:36

People are greedy, deal with it. Consolidating power just gives greedy people a bigger gun to rob you with.

 
Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-08 15:28:47

“Yeah, profit motivated people will regulate themselves.

Seriously? I think I broke a rib laughing so hard.

You cannot possibly be that naive.”

Exactly. Glad somebody else sees what I see.

 
Comment by bluprint
2009-02-08 16:08:35

So how does consolidating power fix that issue?

 
Comment by CA renter
2009-02-08 16:37:57

So how does consolidating power fix that issue?
——————

It doesn’t. IMHO, the kind of regulation we were supposed to have is the kind where power/money is de-centralized.

Unfortunately, the people who make the rules (politicians) and the people who profit from them (corporations/lobbyists) are the same (see how politicians and corporatists move in and out of these positions, where everything looks like it’s changing, but it really stays the same).

 
Comment by bluprint
2009-02-08 17:25:55

The only way you can have regulations is to first consolidate power. Once the power is consolidated who do you think is the type of person most likely to seek out control of that consolidated power?

 
Comment by CA renter
2009-02-09 03:20:08

Wish we could “consolidate” power into the hands of “We The People.”

Yes, there are arguments about us voting for all the goodies, but I’m not sure that’s any worse than what we have now. At least society, in general, would be better of…perhaps more civil.

 
 
Comment by nhz
2009-02-08 08:25:43

well, maybe I should have said: ‘free markets with CEO’s’
I don’t think there are any of those left.

the little chunks of free markets that are left nowadays is local barter, markets for stuff without clear financial value etc. - definitely markets without CEO’s and even more definitely without the means to pay multimillion $ bonuses.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-02-08 09:11:21

Forget about paying bonuses. If you can’t afford to pay protection money, err I mean campaign contributions, you’re not going to survive.

 
 
 
 
Comment by VirginiaTechDan
2009-02-08 07:34:48

Owners of a company decide the pay. If the government is the owner then they may set the pay.

Megacorps only exist because of government… if you don’t like them then remove all of the “anti-competition” laws passed in the name of “regulation” that enable the megacorps to exist. Make the share holders and management personally liable for the actions made by the “company”.

People need to quit asking the government to exercise new, and increasingly intrusive, powers! If they can set CEO pay of companies they do not own, then they can fix all wages. Don’t start down the slippery slope by granting the government “authority” over this area.

Comment by exeter
2009-02-08 12:48:06

“Megacorps only exist because of government…”

Case in point? Microsoft. A government created monopoly.

 
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2009-02-08 13:00:30

We started down that slope LONG ago, and we’re careering wildly downhill.

I agree that, instead of setting up more corporate regulation, it would be better by far to repeal shareholder limited liability, and for that matter all other business corporation laws and corporate charters. But until we can do that, we need to stop pretending that megacorps are free-market entities. Capping executive pay, we can at least hope, may be a step in that direction.

Comment by CA renter
2009-02-08 16:39:42

Well said, LVG!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2009-02-08 16:04:58

Owners of a company decide the pay.

More like crony infested Boards of Directors decide the pay.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 07:38:10

“…if we just continue to let the free market set CEO pay then everything will be fine.”

Tell them you agree — and that companies who violate this free market rule by accepting TARP funds should have their top salaries capped at $500,000 as punishment for undermining the free market’s ability to exact justice.

Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2009-02-08 08:37:39

That would actually be one of the milder punishments that would come to my mind.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 12:22:46

OB has stopped the practice of extraordinary rendition in its tracks, in case that is what you had in mind…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 07:54:21

Tell your free market friends to not get their underwear into knots over political window dressing.

Dean Calbreath: Uproar over executive pay limit is misguided
By Dean Calbreath
Union-Tribune Staff Writer
2:00 a.m. February 8, 2009
Photo of Dean Calbreath

As the nation’s jobless rate surges toward the 8 percent mark, with nearly 5 million people in unemployment lines, there seems to be a double standard for how some people view workers on Wall Street versus Main Street.

Throughout the nation, working-class stiffs are being asked to scale back their spending, work fewer hours and take daunting pay cuts – assuming that they’re lucky enough to keep their jobs.

In California, most state government workers are being furloughed for two days per month, resulting in a 10 percent drop in their salaries. A growing number of private companies, including The San Diego Union-Tribune, are making similar cutbacks (temporarily, we hope).

Yet when it comes to the former Masters of the Universe on Wall Street – many of whom helped engineer the gigantic mess in which we find ourselves – there are still those who question President Barack Obama’s decision last week to impose a $500,000 limit on executive salaries at the financial institutions looking to receive government aid.

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill called the cap “a huge mistake.” Carly Fiorina, the former Hewlett-Packard chief executive who was Sen. John McCain’s economics consultant last year, objected to the cap since “the opportunity to be rewarded for taking prudent risk is fundamental to our economic vitality and strength.”

Scott Talbott, a lobbyist with the Financial Services Roundtable, said salaries should be allowed to reflect the executives’ value on the open market.

“I don’t think the issue is a dollar amount,” Talbott told ABC News. “It’s being paid what you’re worth. Would you be willing to work for less than what you think you’re worth?” (Note to Talbott: Exactly how many non-Wall Streeters have you asked that question?)

Bear in mind that Obama’s restriction has a few major loopholes that will allow most executives to rake in far more than the $500,000 cap. For instance, it places no limits on how many stock options the companies can give their executives – the chief form of compensation these days – though it does impose some restrictions on when the options can be cashed in.

“Theoretically, you could give the executives $100 million worth of free shares,” said Graef Crystal, a compensation analyst based in Santa Rosa.

In addition, the $500,000 limit is not retroactive and applies only to firms that are seeking money from the government. If a company is not getting a huge amount of money, it can request a waiver so it can pay its executives more. And it limits bonuses only for a company’s most senior executives, such as the chief executive and chief financial officer.

“It’s toothless,” Crystal said. “What was it that Shakespeare said? A lot of ’sound and fury, signifying nothing.’ ”

Comment by measton
2009-02-08 19:52:30

They can’t cash the options until the loan is repaid in full. I’m fine with that. I still think their needs to be a change in the tax code to get CEO’s focused on long term growth and not manipulation of numbers and dividends to maximize their pay package. They should pay the 35% tax on all company stock and options unless the stock is given out on a monthly basis and must be sold in 5 years exactly. Then they can get the long term cap gains rate. It’s crazy that we let them hold shares and then sell them all at once at a time remotely of their choosing. ie I”m going to sell most of my stock in 2006 so I’ll slash the research budget in 2005, increase the dividend, sell assets and then rent them back, pay off a few analysts ect ect.

 
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-08 15:04:31

Lehigh,

How about asking the posters when was there a free market?

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2009-02-08 17:28:20

These fools will figure certain truths out on their own once they get their pink slips. Let them cling to their delusions until then.

 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-02-08 06:50:46

Senate approves restriction on foreign hires

The Senate voted Friday to restrict the hiring of foreign workers by banks that are receiving government bailout funds while undergoing vast layoffs.

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/02/06/senate_approves_restriction_on_foreign_hires/

Comment by CA renter
2009-02-08 17:10:19

From the link:

The measure has a two-year life and if signed into law would apply to the more than 300 banks that are receiving money from the taxpayer-funded Troubled Asset Relief Program.

The Senate added the restriction as part of the massive economic stimulus package lawmakers are crafting as part of President Barack Obama’s plan to reinvigorate the economy.

If it becomes law, banks seeking visas to bring in foreign workers would be barred from displacing or replacing American employees for three months before and three months after petitioning the government for the visas.
————————-

Sounds reasonable, if not too mild.

 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-02-08 06:52:12

Bill Clinton: Don’t ruin victory with partisanship

RICHMOND, Va.—Former President Bill Clinton told Virginia Democrats Saturday that the party has won America’s long-running culture war but has to make sure not to squander it with partisanship.

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/02/07/bill_clinton_dont_ruin_victory_with_partisanship/

 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-02-08 06:54:35

Definition of a debt slave?

Nate Parrish, 43, sat with counselors at cafe tables, scrutinizing his finances line by line. When his wife lost her job as a hospice nurse, the truck driver took a second job.

So far, he said, they have not missed a payment on the house they bought for $160,000 in 2000 in Springfield, Mass., but Parrish says each month is a balancing act.

“I’m not behind, but I’m trying to be ahead,” he said. “You can put your head down and do it, but you’re almost at a point where you can’t really make any progress anymore. All you can do is exist.”

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2009/02/07/mortgage_assistance_draws_crowds_to_conn_forum/

Comment by Kim
2009-02-08 13:33:52

I smell a HELOC. Houses are not at 2000 prices yet in Massachusetts.

Comment by Bad Chile
2009-02-08 14:01:31

Not just one HELOC. Three off them according to the Mass Land Records which are public information and searchable for free on-line, but EVERY JOURNALIST I’ve corresponded with has expressed suprise at that fact.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-02-08 06:59:31

Washington Post
Sunday, February 8, 2009; Page A01

The nation’s top economic policymakers were putting the finishing touches yesterday on a financial rescue plan that will deploy hundreds of billions of dollars to spur the flow of credit to consumers and businesses.

The Obama administration aims to ease the financial crisis through a series of steps — including a program to insure banks against extreme losses on mortgages and other loans, a new round of investments in banks, help for homeowners at risk of foreclosure and the broadening of a Federal Reserve program to prop up lending. It could also purchase toxic assets from banks, possibly with financing from the private sector.

The plan amounts to an overhaul of the financial rescue undertaken by the Bush administration. It was scheduled to be announced Monday, though yesterday the administration was considering delaying it until Tuesday to maintain focus on the stimulus. No decision had been made, a source said.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 11:33:43

It sounds like everyone gets a free guarantee. Funny, isn’t it, how private insurers charge their customers premiums in exchange for coverage, but government insurance is free?

Comment by CA renter
2009-02-08 17:27:39

Not really free, PB.

Those campaign contributions cost a lot of money!!!

Mortgage bankers and brokers
Contributions Bills supported and opposed Showing contributions
Jan 2001-Dec 2008 Senate / Jan 2003-Dec 2008 HouseTop 10 Recipients Funded
Recipient Amount
Barack Obama $496,172
Hillary Clinton $380,270
John Kerry $308,430
Christopher Dodd $239,950
John McCain $196,571
Spencer Bachus $194,799
Paul Kanjorski $191,695
Richard Shelby $181,850
Tim Johnson $148,798
Barney Frank $140,501

http://www.maplight.org/map/us/interest/F4600

 
Comment by CA renter
2009-02-08 17:30:05

The first post was for mortgag brokers/lenders.

This one is from “real estate agents”:

Real estate agents
Contributions Bills supported and opposed Showing contributions
Jan 2001-Dec 2008 Senate / Jan 2003-Dec 2008 HouseTop 10 Recipients Funded
Recipient Amount
Barack Obama $2,291,982
Hillary Clinton $2,239,567
John McCain $1,564,143
John Kerry $1,180,280
John Isakson $384,255
Charles Schumer $341,767
Joseph Lieberman $340,010
Robert Menéndez $323,630
Joseph Biden $203,784
John Cornyn $184,200

————————-

It’s fun to check out the different contributors on that site…where the money is coming from, and where it’s going to…

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 19:25:30

OK, point taken. Let’s say they get insurance for a fraction of the true cost then…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2009-02-09 03:16:01

Let’s say they get insurance for a fraction of the true cost then…

That’s for sure!

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-02-08 07:06:46

The dynamics of the financial markets as well as the global nature of the current downturn both have similarities to the depression of the 1930s says Janet Yellen, president of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank.

“The economy is in the midst of a downward spiral, and that calls for strong policy responses. Government policies to restore confidence, create jobs by boosting the demand for goods and services, and improve the functioning of our financial system represent our main hope of avoiding a very severe economic contraction.”

Scary stuff, Ms. Yellen! You are trusting politicians to “boost demand for goods and services and fix the banking industry?” A recession is a cure for an economy gone awry. And you want government to cure the cure?

Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-08 08:10:54

“Government policies to restore confidence…”

ROFLMAO!

 
Comment by nhz
2009-02-08 08:27:03

she must be talking about restoring confidence in the dollar I guess ;)

 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-08 08:30:54

“…create jobs by boosting the demand for goods and services…”

If we were more of a mfg. economy this statement might make a little sense. Otherwise, what’s the end game here? Boost demand for which goods and what services?

Oh, maybe she means boosting demand for zero value added services - like those provided by the agents?

Good luck, this thing’s on autopilot.

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2009-02-08 12:16:56

As a trajectory guy, I resist the “downward spiral” metaphor. More like “close your eyes and pull until it stalls.”

Comment by dude
2009-02-09 08:52:57

…and just ignore those alarms sounding in the background.

 
 
 
Comment by silverback1011
2009-02-08 07:15:56

We did good at court on Friday. The nutbag railed on for almost 2 hours in front of the judge, calling on the Constitution, her newfound expertise as a ” fraud investigator”, called my husband a perjeror ( he gave extensive testimony at the Attorney Ethics Board that was part of the reason she got her license to practice yanked. Four other attorneys also testified against her ), and all sort of other shenanigans. She did everything but a dance to the Real Estate gods with purple smoke coming out of her ears. She did have some steam coming out, though. She also lied about living in the office condo. Turns out she has her own condo in a very swanky area. She needs the office park condo, it seems, to act as a base for her newly-minted “multi-state fraud investigation company” and for her retirement portfolio. Uh huh. What about OUR retirement portfolio and the money she still owes on the illegal loan she took from my husband while acting as his attorney. The judge led her through her digressions back to the point, and finally, the temporary restraining order was lifted. Hopefully, we can hold the sale in the next couple of weeks, once our “big-time” county sheriff starts holding them again. (He pulled a media ploy a few weeks ago and is refusing to hold sheriff sales on foreclosed homes for awhile to give the evictees a chance to “redeem” their homes. They can’t - they’re jobless, but “f” the lenders evidently. He’ll be running for county commissioner soon and this ploy will play well with voters’ sympathies ). This is not a home, though. So, the sale will probably go ahead.

Comment by palmetto
2009-02-08 07:42:07

Wow, I must have missed the back story on this. Sounds like one heckuva clusterfark.

 
Comment by denquiry
2009-02-08 07:53:18

I think that you won the emotional get even war but that you are gonna lose the financial war, as in getting your money back.

Comment by Jimbo
2009-02-08 10:15:51

Yeah. Unfortunately, lawyers have a hard time realizing that the winner is not always the party whose whine is loudest and longest. This is particularly true when the lawyer is a party and, therefore, need not worry about a paying client balking at fees for frivolous, time-consuming stunts designed to thwart– or at least slow down– execution on a judgment. Good luck. I hope you don’t need it.

 
 
Comment by cactus
2009-02-08 09:26:26

the temporary restraining order was lifted.

so you can move all her stuff out of there and sell the place, you hold the mortgage I think ? Thats good .

 
Comment by polly
2009-02-08 09:54:34

Congratulations. The system doesn’t always work, but the real nut jobs often shoot themselves in the foot once they get before a judge. It is the attention. They can’t help it. Also, old lawyer’s wisdom is that the person arguing the law (rather than the facts) is always in trouble. Arguing the law is for appeals.

Old advice - for checking with state bar association about what to do with the client files - still goes. See if they will come and pick up the files. They collect dues. They should do something useful with it other than throw cocktail parties.

Comment by silverback1011
2009-02-08 12:40:27

I did tell the back story on a few days back. A few people thought that she was sleeping with my husband ( before I knew him ) after he was widowed but he wasn’t. He just hired her to close his father’s estate and do his tax return. Turned into a major clusterfark all right. We can’t move her stuff out until she gets to have a 6-redemption period under our state’s law. Sad. That makes a magnificent total of 16 months she’ll have had a free ride, because there is a 5-month period prior to the sheriff sale, a 6 month redemption period after the sale, and the 3 months she got it delayed, plus 2 months she had to come up with the final balloon payment. But, of course, we’re the horrible people in this mess. Luckily, my stepsister is an excellent attorney. The nutbag hates her guts, and is afraid of her. My husband ran into the wrong attorney, and was grief-stricken enough and sick enough to trust her. But, now at least she can’t practice law, and he’s a lot wiser about his money than he was 12 years ago. Once we get her and her crap moved out of there, we’ll have the place cleaned out, and put it up for sale. No land contracts allowed, LOL. I tell the story here because a. it’s a real foreclosure, not just one in the newspapers, and b. it’s a cautionary tale.

Comment by CA renter
2009-02-08 17:45:52

Glad to hear things are going your way on this, silverback!

Yours is definitely a cautionary tale about how some people will always look to take advantage of others during a moment of weakness or crisis.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2009-02-08 17:30:50

Bottom line: Your husband was a fool for ever getting tangled up with such a loon of a lawyer.

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-08 19:34:18

No Sammy, he made a mistake. We all make mistakes. You’ve never made a mistate?

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2009-02-08 20:14:53

Every man makes one mistake in his life that dwarfs all the others, plus lots of other “what was I thinking?” smaller but painful ones. Yes I’ve made plenty of mistakes and yes I’ve been a fool. I’ll freely admit it. But I’m so darned handsome you can’t hold it against me.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-08 20:24:27

A+ answer, there, Sammy. :)

 
Comment by scdave
2009-02-08 21:50:35

Took the words out my mouth Sammy :)

 
Comment by silverback1011
2009-02-09 04:39:21

Yes, he made a terrible foolish mistake. Yes, he’s paid dearly for it over the last twelve years as her mental illness deepened. I met her once when she was well many years ago and she was at least presentable as an attorney then. You go ahead and make great decisions right after your wife died, your only brother/sibling died, your father died, you just had a heart attack, and you’re in recover after quintuple bypass surgery 3 week prior. Go for it. I wouldn’t wish that combination of terrible circumstances on anyone, even arrogant assholes. But yes, he knows he was a fool, and he’s been paying for it ever since.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by DennisN
2009-02-08 07:36:31

This is an off topic question for OlyGal….

Kings and queens have crowns. Princesses have tiaras. What do you call the simple metal circle that princes wear? A princely circlet? Is there a proper term for this thing?

Comment by combotechie
2009-02-08 07:39:05

I had a dog named Prince that wore a flea collar. Does that count?

 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-02-08 07:47:20

What is coronets?

Comment by DennisN
2009-02-08 08:58:41

Thanks. I’ve been poking around on the web and have found there is an entire industry based upon royal headgear. Circlet refers to a design characteristic.

http://www.geocities.com/noelcox/coronets.htm

In his book Divine Right, Richard Tomlinson says that the Scottish Crown was fashioned from gold which sat upon the brow of Robert the Bruce.

 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-08 10:47:34

Well, I’m glad you’re thinking about the really important things in life, Dennis, instead of wasting your time and mental powers on trivial subjects.
You know, I would have said ‘circlet’ as well. It depends on the shape of the adornment, partly. ‘Coronet’ works, or perhaps a ‘diadem’; again, depending on the shape and style. Hey! Does this mean you’re gonna start wearing one? I approve of that! And if so, just go ahead and call it whatever you want. Hey, it’s YOUR head, and you’re the boss, right? Right. So load that puppy up with jewels and start prancing around.
I bet if you were to walk up to the newspaper boy and point to your noggin and announce regally to him: ‘Lookit, Jim-Bob, this here’s my Crown/Circlet/Coronet/Tiara of Power and Regal Beneficence’, why, I’m sure he would nod respectfully.
Awesome!

I’m going to go fetch my favorite tiara and put it on right this very minute, and then prance friskily around a bit, just like you!

Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-08 13:32:48

It appears as if DennisN’s attempt to converse with you has backfired. I seriously doubt that he hoped to conjure images of himself “prancing around friskily” in a jeweled headpiece.

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-08 16:33:13

‘doubt that he hoped to conjure images of himself “prancing around friskily” in a jeweled headpiece.’

Nonsense, man! EVERYBODY wants to do that! Right?
I mean, come on! That’s the best thing to do on a nice Sunday. I did it while I sang ‘Choctaw Bingo’, by that McMurtry man, until I was tired and had to go refresh myself. It was perfect.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by DennisN
2009-02-08 16:47:55

Actually I’m working on writing a story where the Windsor family resigns the monarchy and gives the crown back to god.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-08 20:25:29

What’s God gonna do with it? When they gives it back?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 07:45:30

Now the MSM is doom and gloom all the time. A couple of years ago the troll brigade labeled those who post here “gloomsters.” I personally could never hold a candle to what I now read in the daily news.

Labels for downturns lack a clear definition
By Dean Calbreath
Union-Tribune Staff Writer

2:00 a.m. February 8, 2009
On Sept. 20, 1873, as the Great Panic was erupting, the stock exchange closed the doors on its members (top left). On Nov. 24, 1933, four years into the Great Depression, about 5,000 lined up for federal jobs relief in New York City (bottom). And on Oct. 9, 2008, specialist Justin Bohan watched as the Dow plunged 675 points. (Library of Congress and Associated Press images) -

With unemployment soaring to 7.6 percent and economic growth drooping by its greatest level in three decades, there’s no question that the United States is in a severe recession.

But how much worse do things have to get before we’re in a depression?

In recent days, business leaders ranging from real estate mogul Donald Trump to General Electric Chairman Jeffrey Immelt have used the “D-word” to describe where they fear the economy is headed.

Yet nobody knows for certain because there is no clear definition of what separates a recession from a depression. In fact, there’s no clear definition of either word.

The National Bureau of Economic Research, the semiofficial voice for determining the nation’s business cycles, defines a recession as “a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months.”

That description is so vague that it takes months for the bureau to determine whether a recession has started. For instance, it waited until December 2008 to announce that the current recession began in December 2007.

The bureau, a private organization founded in 1920, defines a depression as “a particularly severe period of economic weakness,” which is even more vague than its definition of recession.

Before 1929, nearly all economic contractions were referred to as depressions. Severe depressions were usually called “panics,” such as the Great Panic of 1873 or the Bankers’ Panic of 1907. The reason President Herbert Hoover insisted on calling the downturn of the 1930s a “great depression” is that it sounded milder than “panic.”

But the Great Depression was so dire that after it ended, nobody wanted to use the word again. They adopted “recession” to describe the downturns of the past 60 years.

The antipathy toward the word was so severe that President Jimmy Carter banned economic adviser Alfred Kahn from using it as the economy soured in the late 1970s. Kahn jokingly replaced the word with “banana,” warning the president that “we’re in danger of having the worst banana in 45 years.”

Comment by combotechie
2009-02-08 07:55:56

In my view a recession is a liquidity issue while a depression is a solvency issue.

Recessions occur because money rates are expensive but money is nevertheless available. Depressions occur because, although money rates are cheap, money is unavailable.

Comment by CA renter
2009-02-08 17:52:56

I like your thought process, combo.
Regarding this bit:

Depressions occur because, although money rates are cheap, money is unavailable.

I’d go even further (and believe you share this opinion, too) and say that money IS available, but nobody is solvent enough to borrow and **pay it back.**

 
 
Comment by denquiry
2009-02-08 07:59:21

I would rather be known as a gloomster (realist) any day of the week than be known as a sucker losing my hard earned cash to the wall street harlots. And while we are at it let’s not be calling what wall street received a bailout. It welfare . It’s that simple, to quote Ross Perot.

 
Comment by wmbz
2009-02-08 08:27:45

“Now the MSM is doom and gloom all the time. A couple of years ago the troll brigade labeled those who post here “gloomsters.”

Right you are, but it’s okay for MSM, politicians and the current occupier of the oval office to run around trying to scare the hell out of people. The world is getting ready to stop spinning and we’re all going to be ejected, type of crap.

It’s all being done to achieve one goal, more gubmint control, less and less freedom etc… As anyone paying attention knows, the idea that a bunch of politicians can ‘fix’ this problem is laughable. Sad part is that they will not stop ‘doing’ and will drag this thing out for a loooong time to come.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-08 08:42:57

What surprises me is that they can’t see that there is no real innovation in their plans. Sure, on a tactical level they’ve invented new ways to slosh money around - but on the whole they are trying to revive a dying era.

The 21st century is a global century, yet the DC crowd can’t shake its romanticized fondness for the past. Square peg - round hole.

 
Comment by GH
2009-02-08 09:55:00

IMO the only possible move would have been to save our small to medium size businesses, which are folding at ever increasing rates. The banks are too big to save (not too big to fail) and obviously are dysfunctional to the extreme. A trillion dollars would have gone a long way in the small business world, or perhaps it is proper the enconomy collapses and we start all over (Amero?)

Comment by darrell_in_phx
2009-02-08 11:00:07

But, those businesses were based on their customers’ ability to go ever deeper into debt. We’ve focused far too much on corporate profitability and tax rates paid by the rich, and have done nothing to worry about customers actually having money needed to buy stuff now that they can’t just keep going further into debt.

We need a make-stuff, grow-stuff, process-stuff economy… Not a generate-debt, asset-bubble, hyper-consumption economy.

The vast majority of businesses that exist today, need to not exist.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2009-02-08 15:28:38

Are you saying there is something wrong with investing in investments that invest in other investing investments? (say that 3 times fast!)

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 11:38:36

“A trillion dollars would have gone a long way in the small business world, or perhaps it is proper the enconomy collapses and we start all over (Amero?)”

But wouldn’t empowering the growth engine of small business potentially rob the Fed of some of its ever-growing power?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by reuven
2009-02-08 12:32:46

I’m astounded that “Main Street” can’t even fathom that a tax cut can put money in an individuals pockets just as a handout can. (Forgetting about the fact that someone will have to pay for a handout, but nobody will have to pay for a tax cut.)

My preference would be to let the banks and however many millions of FBs there are simply go bankrupts, and let more honest folks pick up the pieces.

But if we must tinker, the only thing than makes sense is reducing taxes for business, favoring small business who are more likely to create/provide jobs for Americans.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SUGuy
2009-02-08 12:49:07

But if we must tinker, the only thing than makes sense is reducing taxes for business, favoring small business who are more likely to create/provide jobs for Americans.

Bingo. We have a winner. A+

 
Comment by polly
2009-02-08 13:24:48

“but nobody will have to pay for a tax cut”

You aren’t serious, are you? You shilling voodoo economics?

 
Comment by reuven
2009-02-08 13:39:11

Tell me, then…who pays for a tax cut?

 
Comment by Pullthetrigger?
2009-02-08 15:59:22

The megacorporations and the wealthy! Let them pay! I’m really getting pi$$ed about this $hit. We’re paying all the wrong people. Bush was right about the stimulus checks we received last year. The problem is that we need many more to pay off our debts to make the banks and businesses whole again. After all, we’re paying for it! Like the higher ups in Citigroup.. what do they do with the bailout money? They use it for private jets for themselves, yet still clamp down on lending. What a travesty of justice! If the government is going to give money away, they should give it back to Joe six pack, the tax payers, the lower-and-middle-and-higher middle class, not the rich sharks. Let the upper echelon move off shores if they can find a better place. Where are they going to go? Mexico? Argentina? Good luck with that.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 19:14:10

“Let the upper echelon move off shores if they can find a better place. Where are they going to go?”

Why should they bother to leave if they can bribe make campaign contributions to persuade some politician to funnel tax dollars their way? Money talks and BS walks.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2009-02-08 08:46:58

Panic, depression, shock, collapse, banana….

Banana, fana, fofana, fe fi fofama….Obama!

Call it whatever you like, it’s here.

 
Comment by laughing boy
2009-02-08 09:10:14

It took them a year to be able to utter the word ‘recession’. Probably this coming December (08) they will announce that we are in a ‘depression’ and have been since the beginning of the year. Takes them a while to build up the courage.

Comment by laughing boy
2009-02-08 09:22:12

…er… make that December 09. I misplaced a year… I’m sure it’s laying around here somewhere….

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 07:48:30

What makes a forecast defensible? Is it predictive accuracy? Apparently not; rather it is whether your forecast is no worse than the next economist’s.

SD Union-Tribune
Builders say dim forecast is not nearly dim enough
By Lew Sichelman
2:00 a.m. February 8, 2009

LAS VEGAS – Contrary to popular belief, the country’s residential construction business is not at a complete standstill.

But it’s close. According to the latest Commerce Department figures, sales in December were running at a seasonally adjusted rate of 331,000, the slowest pace on record.

The new home market is particularly slow in California, where the state’s builders sold a few more than 3,500 houses in November, the latest month for which statewide figures are available. In normal times, Golden State builders account for about one in every eight new home sales nationally.

Looked at another way, sales in November were 63 percent below the number of sales logged in November 2007, which in and of itself “was an extremely bad month,” according to Robert Rivinius, president of the California Building Industry Association.

And it’s going to get worse before it gets better, industry leaders said recently at the National Association of Home Builders’ annual convention and trade show.

NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe said the last time housing was in a recession this severe was in the early ’80s.

Crowe is forecasting a gradual increase in sales beginning in the second quarter and a more “modest” uptick in housing production some months later. But he warned that the recovery will be a “rolling” one in which those markets where prices were not out of line and inventories of completed but unsold houses are not out of kilter will be the first to show improvement.

The recovery won’t reach the “headline states” – California, Nevada, Florida and Arizona – for some time, the economist said.

While some NAHB members believe his forecast is too optimistic, the economist defended it, saying it is “not out of line” with what others are predicting. “If anything, I try to be more pessimistic so I don’t get builders to do something they shouldn’t.”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 07:58:44

Community News
Obama will tour Lehigh Acres sometime Tuesday
Nobody from Lehigh expected to be on Obama tour of community

By MEL TOADVINE and KEVIN SHEA, mtoadvine@breezenewspapers.com
POSTED: February 7, 2009

At least one area businessman wants to show President Barack Obama how well his firm does with vacant homes in Lehigh Acres that have been foreclosed. Obama is coming to Fort Myers on Tuesday in an effort to push his economic stimulus package and then he is expected to take a tour of Lehigh Acres. How that tour will proceed, by caravan or helicopter, was to be decided today.

Jack Lee of Equity Properties Asset Management Inc, in Cape Coral said Saturday that his firm manages more than 800 of the vacant homes in Lehigh.

“Our homes, unlike many others all have the yards maintained, etc. We would enjoy becoming part of the Lehigh presentation to Obama by showing him how some lenders maintain their homes, how we help people buy homes and how now is the best time to move to Lehigh,” Lee said.

Lee was seeking ways Saturday to tell his story to the President who will appear Tuesday morning at the Harborside Event Center in downtown Fort Myers. It is the first time in memory for many for a Democrat President to visit Southwest Florida. Bush made two visits here over the past few years and President Gerald Ford came to Southwest Florida.

The Fort Myers Cape Coral areas and Lehigh, in particular, have been cited as areas in the country where there are large inventories of foreclosed homes and high unemployment rates.

The latest information from Realty Trac, an Internet service, shows 8,935 homes in foreclosed or default status including 4,270 current default, 2,648 bank owned, and 2,017 listed in sheriff sales in Lehigh Acres.

For the period 2007-2009 almost 50 percent of the homes will have been in foreclosure, are in foreclosure, or in pre-foreclosure.

 
Comment by darrell_in_phx
2009-02-08 08:02:01

Dark clouds loom for Valley’s commercial real estate
Commercial buildings will be hard to refinance
by J. Craig Anderson - Feb. 8, 2009 12:00 AM
The Arizona Republic

About $4.5 billion in securitized commercial mortgages is set to mature in the Phoenix area this year, with little hope of refinancing for commercial-property owners whose equity has slipped away.

“The commercial market really hasn’t taken its hit - yet,” said Beth Jo Zeitzer, president of R.O.I. Properties in Phoenix. “We’ll see a similar pattern to what’s happening in residential real estate.”

 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-02-08 08:02:19

US bail-out faces radical overhaul due to poor public image

The US government is considering renaming the $700bn (£474bn) Troubled Asset Relief Programme (TARP) and spinning it off into a separate body in an attempt to improve the poor public image of America’s banking bail-out.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/recession/4550646/US-bail-out-faces-radical-overhaul-due-to-poor-public-image.html

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 11:44:28

So far as I am concerned, the public image of welfare payments for wealthy bankers has been toast ever since the MSM started referring to it as “bailouts.”

 
 
Comment by darrell_in_phx
2009-02-08 08:04:41

42 years ago today, I was hatched. I spent the first couple waking hours listening to politicians flapping their pie holes, proving they don’t get it. Happy flippin’ b-day to me.

I’m definately in a grumpy mood today.

Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-02-08 08:55:26

Happy 3rd anniversary of your 39th birthday!

 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-08 09:04:29

Happy Birthday punk ass kid!

Stop being grumpy, its a beautiful day for a ride. Get on your Harley, Quad or Pinto and do something.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-02-08 09:15:44

Jeez, you’re just a pup!

Comment by hoz
2009-02-08 09:45:30

Time to change the tip on my cane! lol

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by hoz
2009-02-08 10:23:02

I’m outta here, taking my own advice and going out for a ride on the sled!

 
 
Comment by scdave
2009-02-08 10:08:33

Ah yes…To be 42 again…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by darrell_in_phx
2009-02-08 11:02:06

I own none of the above.

I am taking a break from cleaning house. Some birthday.

Comment by silverback1011
2009-02-08 12:51:21

Hippy Happy Pappy Hoppy Birthday ( paraphrasing Winnie Ther Pooh ). Forty-two sounds like a pretty good deal to me. Wish we were there with ya. We’d take ya out for some Mexican and then go drive into the desert and watch the sunset out Wickenburg Way. Have a Gr8 2009 even though I know you’re getting over you’re divorce. You’re a good person and are gonna be fine, but there’s some pain to get through first. Been there, done that. Best wishes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-08 10:20:41

Happy Birthday, Darrell! Happy Birthday! *sings Happy Birthday to ‘Darrell-in-Phoenix’ loudly and prettily and mostly on key *

Now, quitcher poutin’ ways. Stop listening to politicians and go make a giant cake and then eat it all, along with a gallon of Birthday Beer. That’s just for breakfast. You can do it again for lunch, if you wish, only this time delicately place a carrot atop the cake. That’s for nutrition, since yer gettin’ on in years. (I’m teasing. ) :)

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-08 15:18:06

Happy Birthday to you
Happy Birthday to you
Happy Birthday dear Darrell
Happy Birthday to youuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
And many moreeeeeeeeeee

Happy birthday Darrell. Just think in 8 years you will have lived a 1/2 century. ;)

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-08 16:34:36

That was so pretty I had to wipe the tears of rapture from my eyes. :)

 
 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-02-08 08:07:14

TEL AVIV (MarketWatch) — AT&T and its wireless-service workers agreed to continue bargaining over a new labor contract after their previous agreement expired just after midnight Sunday….
The contract covers 20,000 of AT&T’s 300,000 employees…

Media reports say AT&T Mobility workers voted 85% (!!!) on Friday to authorize a strike if the two sides couldn’t come to terms….

20,000 jobs openings… this is good news.

 
Comment by WAman
2009-02-08 08:13:26

Can anyone direct me to a site that shows what people bought their houses for in Chester County PA?

Comment by scdave
2009-02-08 11:20:35

bought their houses for in Chester County PA ??

Can’t give you access but I have access…Give me a address….

Comment by WAman
2009-02-08 12:32:53

135 Watch hill rd Coatesville Pa 19320

Thanks

Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-02-08 16:00:20

from zillow.com - Appears it’s for sale

Last sale and tax info
Sold 11/15/2006: $317,053 *
2008 Property Tax: $5,135

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by ouro verde
2009-02-08 08:17:16

It will be OK now because the Senators are coming!

 
Comment by WT Economist
2009-02-08 08:21:27

Lots of doom in the NY Times today. If Sam Zell the famed “grave dancer” isselling all his commerical real estate, and Blackstone is turning around and dumpting what it bought, why are you buying?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/07/business/07properties.html?em

“The list of Equity Office buyers reads like a Who’s Who in American real estate…Today, the wreckage of those purchases is strewn across the country, from Southern California to Austin, Tex., to Chicago to New York. Many of the 16 companies that bought Equity Office buildings are now stuck with punishing debt, properties whose values are plummeting and millions of feet of office space they cannot fill.”

“The impact could ripple beyond the companies that bought Equity Office buildings and the investment banks that financed them. If the owners cannot make their loan payments, it could create a financial crisis for the pension funds, hedge funds and insurance companies that hold securities based on Equity Office mortgages.”

Also, condominiums getting stuck by delinquent owners, in part because laws make them second fiddle to mortgage holders.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/08/realestate/08COV.html?ref=realestate

“While lawyers are reporting a similar rash of defaults among co-op owners, the risk to the building (and by extension to the defaulter’s neighbors) is slight by comparison. That’s because a co-op building is entitled to its share before the bank can claim anything in the event of foreclosure (the ultimate consequence of nonpayment of maintenance charges).”

“But in condo foreclosures, the debt priorities are reversed. After a foreclosure process that these days can take two years — during which unpaid common charges proliferate — the building gets its due only after the bank is paid in full. And many condo owners have little equity in their apartments.”

Comment by scdave
2009-02-08 11:24:33

Hello increased HOA dues to meet the mandatory reserves…

Comment by reuven
2009-02-08 13:02:37

BTW: For people who hate HOAs, there are some great HOA websites that have been around for years. 5 years ago when I used to run around telling people how evil HOAs are, and that eventually people will wise up and HOA-ruled communities would be *undesirable* folks thought I was a kook. Not anymore….

Here’s one of the better HOA-abuse sites, that’s been around for years:

http://www.ahrc.com/new/index.php/src/news

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-02-08 08:32:01

Not that it would make any difference, but this should have been the lead story in the media day after day.

CBO: Obama stimulus harmful over long haul…

President Obama’s economic recovery package will actually hurt the economy more in the long run than if he were to do nothing, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday.

CBO, the official scorekeepers for legislation, said the House and Senate bills will help in the short term but result in so much government debt that within a few years they would crowd out private investment, actually leading to a lower Gross Domestic Product over the next 10 years than if the government had done nothing.

CBO estimates that by 2019 the Senate legislation would reduce GDP by 0.1 percent to 0.3 percent on net. [The House bill] would have similar long-run effects, CBO said in a letter to Sen. Judd Gregg, New Hampshire Republican, who was tapped by Mr. Obama on Tuesday to be Commerce Secretary.

Comment by palmetto
2009-02-08 08:45:57

“President Obama’s economic recovery package will actually hurt the economy more in the long run than if he were to do nothing, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday.”

Yep, Larry Summers is on the punditry shows this morning shilling the stimulus. Sound bites of Barky all over the place warning of catastrophe if the stimulus package isn’t passed. Second verse, same as the first. Reminds me of the TARP “panic”. Use fear to sell the sheeple on very bad ideas. What the hey, Little Caligula used fear all through his regime. The Dems took a leaf from his book and are crying wolf. All through the Bush regime, the dems were like dogs at an orgy, standing around watching, wagging their tails and vaguely wondering how they could get in on the action. They took up the torch with Paulson and have been carrying it ever since.

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-08 10:49:29

When I first read your post I thought you said ‘putridity shows’.

Actually, that works better.

 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-08 08:48:55

By 2019 the current crop will be comfortably retired with lifelong benefits and pensions - probably earning big bucks on the side as very part time lobbyists.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2009-02-08 08:49:07

less Less in the short run, more Less in the long run!

Comment by scdave
2009-02-08 10:11:53

Good One skye…

 
 
Comment by joeyinCAlif
2009-02-08 09:00:45

BO should know better. Economic recovery lip-gloss and job creation eyeliner is not enough. It also needs lots of deodorant.

 
Comment by WAman
2009-02-08 11:41:21

That’s probably true at present tax rates. However everybody knows that taxes have to go up and they should on the rich (125k and up). Capital gains needs to go back to 28% as well.

Comment by dude
2009-02-09 09:16:50

That will surely do great things for the GDP.

 
 
 
Comment by Sagesse
2009-02-08 08:54:34

15 top JPM executives awarded themselves 111 million, two weeks ago (what executive paycut?). …”received very large bonuses in the form of Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) and Restricted Stock Units. These equity compensation securities are not easy to understand or value by other than experts in the field.”
Google Jesse’s Cafe Americain.

Comment by ecofeco
2009-02-08 15:37:02

“They’re worth what we say they’re worth, see? You gotta problem with that?”

 
 
Comment by Terry
2009-02-08 08:56:28

Yesterday, a friend of who is retired stopped by to discuss a mechanical problem with his water suppy. After solving the problem, he started to just talk about his financial condition. He mentioned the condo he bought in Port St. Lucie in 2006…he was lettting it go into forclosure, couldn’t get a tenant to rent it out, also stated he has never even seen the condo. Then he cosigned on a condo for his son…that is in forclosure. He just can’t afford to keep up the payments and taxes.
Whats troubling here, is that I have to believe, that no matter what the government does, people like this, are still going to walk away.
He could’nt afford them even if he got a loan clawdown or an interst rate reduction….Catch 22.
With that in mind, yes, we have a long way to go to the bottom.
In the spirit of things, i wrote Senator Fiengold yesterday, basically stating the same situation and making the point, that no matter what Congess does, this depression now has a life of its own, and until people start taking personal responsibility for their financial actions and realize, that money made on the backs of others losing, is wrong. Life is a risk, whether it be your health, your job, or your finances, its a risk. So, if you feel the ned to sue someone, because you took a risk and it failed, sue yourself!

Comment by BubbleViewer
2009-02-08 09:10:54

Yes, during these tough times, it is a simple question of economics and mathematics.
And you’re right, the downturn seems to have taken a life of its own. By the end, I’m guessing in late 2010 or 2011, those who are still left standing and solvent will be able to buy houses for prices that they never could have imagined, especially in places like CA and FL, which despite all their faults, have pretty darn good climates.
The key is surviving the next 18-24 months, which won’t be easy.

Comment by polly
2009-02-08 10:04:18

The climates may be good, but the societal infrastructure will still be a mess. The HOAs that everyone complains abotu so bitterly may be providing real security instead of telling people what color curtains they can have. And the hospitals may be a real mess.

Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-08 18:01:23

Sadly, it’s true. There are a few areas in CA which I love because of the natural beauty. I would never think of relocating there due to the societal ills which will never be cured.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 19:16:59

Life is a tradeoff. I have lived in places in the midwest with far worse societal ills (e.g. higher crime rates, more severe air pollution) and less attractive scenery to boot.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-08 19:43:42

Bantering Bear,

Please tell me where there is a place that doesn’t have the societal ills. You will find problems where ever you go.

 
Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-08 21:22:09

Now, now, my friends. I’m not trying to bash your beloved home. In fact I, too, love CA. Certainly every area has it’s problems, but CA has degenerated in terrific fashion. The massive overpopulation, crime, gridlock, air pollution, and extremely high cost of living have taken their toll. Then there is the healthcare scene, replete with kidney transplants for illegal aliens.

 
 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2009-02-08 09:15:09

2312 Se Bounty
Port Saint Lucie, FL 34953 $69,000
4 Bed, 2 Bath, 2,092 Sq Ft
Property Type: Single Family Home

Completed in 07
Good luck with those PSL condos

Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-02-08 09:47:06

This was from an older ad - not sure of the date though.
Quite a haircut from the previous perceived value.

$195000.00
2312 SE Bounty Ave.
Port Saint Lucie, FL. 34952

 
 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-02-08 09:18:57

Terry-
Your closing 2 sentences were well said. Personal responsibility would keep many folks out of BK, the ICU, and lower the revenue of religions (a shield for personal responsibility in any cases). Govt. is an enabler too, due to the rescue incentives.

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2009-02-08 12:10:10

“He mentioned the condo he bought in Port St. Lucie in 2006…he was lettting it go into forclosure, couldn’t get a tenant to rent it out, also stated he has never even seen the condo. Then he cosigned on a condo for his son…that is in forclosure. He just can’t afford to keep up the payments and taxes.
Whats troubling here, is that I have to believe, that no matter what the government does, people like this, are still going to walk away.”

Dier Straits Walk of Life

Here come Johnny gonna sell you a condo, bopa-lula baby what I say, he got a plan gonna make him some money
Bought it down in FLA
He got the action, got the motion
Oh yeah the boy can play

But now he`s tired of the payments and the double talk
Yeah he`s tired of the trouble and the strife

So what he does, he does the walk of life

 
 
Comment by Rancher
2009-02-08 09:01:41

Question: The $15k tax credit to buy a new house that’s in the Senates new Porkulus bill, will that just
raise home prices by that amount, or will home
prices continue to fall regardless?

Comment by Blue Skye
2009-02-08 09:13:06

It appears to be aimed at the $100K+ income crowd going after the $150K house. Big pent up demand?

I also wonder if it is phased out with AMT.

Biggest incentive; I buy my sister’s house and she buys mine. In two years we revert the deeds.

Comment by Captain Credit Crunch
2009-02-08 11:08:53

Family trades are ruled out in statute. Sorry!

Comment by dude
2009-02-09 09:22:16

CCC! Long time no C.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by scdave
2009-02-08 10:26:08

Combine the 15k credit particularly if there is a carry over provision, with the standard tax deductions with home ownership and its likely to help the entry level market…Thats real money to someone in the lower brackets…

Comment by WAman
2009-02-08 11:59:39

But how much tax does someone pay at the lower levels - maybe you don’t know so I will tell you. In 2008 my wife and I had total income of around $69,000 and we paid around $1,100 in taxes after deductions. So if I bought a house I would get $1,100 back. That is not going to make me run out to get a house. I would much rather wait until the price drops another 10% or more.

Comment by bluprint
2009-02-08 12:35:10

The remainder of the credit, as the Senate amendment is written, would allow you to transfer the remainder of the creidt as payment for expenses incurred in purchasing the house as well as in payment for liabilities incurred (e.g. if you borrow a downpayment).

I’m sure a market would open to handle that, e.g. in your case you could borrow 13,900 from some entity that pays at least that much in taxes, then pay the loan back by transferring the credit to that entity.

Presumably in a commercial instance there would be a fee of some sort you would pay but you could do the same with friends/family.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by bluprint
2009-02-08 12:36:45

Oh, and the amount of credit wouldn’t always be 15k, but rather 10% of the price of the house.

 
 
Comment by scdave
2009-02-08 22:02:19

Hmmm…$69,000. in income and $1,000. in taxes..?? Can I apply for that plan…?? Maybe thats the problem…???

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by dude
2009-02-09 09:25:36

He got a bad deal. I made around 130K all told in ‘07 and paid $0.

Disclaimer, only about 60K was salary.

 
 
 
 
Comment by WAman
2009-02-08 11:55:38

Do you know what a tax credit is? If you buy a house this year you get the credit when you file your 2009 taxes in 2010. And to get the $15,000 you need to have paid about $22,000 in taxes as the credits are after every other deduction.

So do you still think that people will raise the price of their house?

Republicans love to offer tax credits because many people have no idea what a tax credit is.

Comment by Bad Chile
2009-02-08 14:30:01

I have no doubt the NAR will insist the government will hand you $15,000…look at all the “mortgage interest is a tax deduction” misinformation!

 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2009-02-08 09:05:21

Profesor Bear,

BTW, I think maybe I cyphered your riddle from yesterday. It is all about Census speak. According to data released by the Census in Dec08, the “Homeowner Vacancy Rate” for 3Q2008 was 2.8%. Considering that as of the end of 2007 we had 75M owner occupied units one would conclude that there are 2M vacant houses. Not so; there were 17.5M unoccupied housing units including 13.1M “Vacant” units at the end of 2007.

It’s all a matter of definition. “Homeowner Vacancy Rate” is only the % Homeowner Homes for sale. “Vacant” units includes seasonal homes, empty rentals, but not seasonal houses. I didn’t want to dig into this any further, it’s obvious there are a lot of freaking houses for sale, and even more that could soon be.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 12:10:20

Thanks for thinking about it. It seems like the statistics should at least try to tease out the distinction between “permanent vacancies,” which would include seasonal homes owned by the wealthy but only occupied part of the year, and “temporary vacancies,” which would include rental units not currently occupied and unused empty houses not yet up for sale. The “temporary vacancies” category has far stronger implications for the future direction of home prices and rents than do “permanent vacancies.” Perhaps the Census Bureau already draws such distinctions, but if so, MSM reports have seriously muddled the details. My sense is that the ratio of homes in “temporary vacancy” status to vacant homes for sale may be at a record right now, but I have no idea if anyone even tracks this sort of statistic.

Comment by Jay_Huhman
2009-02-08 14:37:28

Bureau of the Census Housing vacancy numbers (table 8 for the above):
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/hvs/historic/index.html

Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-08 19:00:24

Thanks for the chart, Jay. Nearly 19 million vacant houses is a staggering number. Something is terribly wrong in a country where hard working people cannot afford a shelter over their head, yet 19 million houses sit vacant, unused, and deteriorating. This is clearly a failure of democracy and capitalism.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 19:18:58

Thanks, but I remain confused. For example, where does one find the large increase in the number of vacant bank-owned homes not yet on the market in those categories? The number has to be huge, but I see no obvious place to look for it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by darrell_in_phx
2009-02-08 09:06:31

I think “This Week with Stephenopilies” had an interest exchange…

Topic: Bipartisanship dead.
Ging-grinch says that the Dems wrote a bill that is highly partisan, then just expected the Reps to support it because of the crisis mode. (like the Dems did with TARP)

Reich throws out my position. This is smart of the Reps since at best the stimulus will just slow the rate are which thinds are getting worse, so the Reps will be able to argue the Dems messed up and the Rep plan would have been better. Hard to prove ifs, but they don’t have to prove the ifs, just that the Dem plan didn’t work.

Then Will jumps in with the bottom line. Partisanship exists for a reason and you can’t just “make it go away”.

Then… in my opinion, it got interesting. Why not just cut payroll taxes and the Reps want? Helps people, helps business…. creates deficits and that is what stimulates…..

Ohhhhhhh….. So why not turn that around on the Republicans? So, it wasn’t more important to cut taxes on the rich than on the poor as you claimed back in 2002? So, we COULD raise capital gains tax to 50%, and cut income tax in half, and it WOULD stimulate the economy, assuming the cuts were larger than the increases?

Many, many times Bernanke has said that a NET tax increase would be bad. And everytime, the Reps say… SEE we need to keep the capital gains tax rate low! WRONG!!! IF we increase the capital gains tax, then we need to offset it with something!

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-08 09:30:50

One really gets the feeling that both parties know it’s flawed - but one party didn’t paint themselves into a corner by talking about it for the past year* - so they have the luxury of not having any pressure on them to deliver anything.

*A certain CA rep and NV sen began calling for a second stimulus before all the checks for the first were even mailed.

 
Comment by polly
2009-02-08 10:25:43

This whole thing has been flawed by a classic negotiating mistake. I’ve seen it before. One side seems to have the upper hand, so they decide to “take the high road” and put a lot of stuff in their offer that they think the other side will like. In their mind, the offer they put forward is already a compromise. The other side has no reason to see it as such because they didn’t have to do any work to get it there. Why not act as if you are insulted by the offer and demand that negotiating means making a change from what was originally offered?

The original bill was a bit of a compromise - more thax cuts than the House dems would originally have given I think, though not more than the Obama administration wanted. They were in favor of the amount of tax cuts in the bill because it is easier to implement tax cuts than spending. Why the administration thought they could get the republicans to just play along nice with this, is beyond me. I understand why they didn’t want to put out the most partisan bill possible in public - not in keeping with the campaign. And they didn’t want to do it all behind closed doors - that is Washington as usual. But a little negotiating before anything got written down and just in the leadership could have made some difference. It also would have taken a while. I guess it is the time loss that they were too scared of, but it is too bad, because this has been truely painful to watch.

 
 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-08 09:12:40

You Try to Live on 500K in This Town

“…Five hundred thousand dollars — the amount President Obama wants to set as the top pay for banking executives whose firms accept government bailout money — seems like a lot, and it is a lot. To many people in many places, it is a princely sum to live on. But in the neighborhoods of New York City and its suburban enclaves where successful bankers live, half a million a year can go very fast.

“As hard as it is to believe, bankers who are living on the Upper East Side making $2 or $3 million a year have set up a life for themselves in which they are also at zero at the end of the year with credit cards and mortgage bills that are inescapable,” said Holly Peterson, the author of an Upper East Side novel of manners, “The Manny,” and the daughter of Peter G. Peterson, a founder of the equity firm the Blackstone Group. “Five hundred thousand dollars means taking their kids out of private school and selling their home in a fire sale.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/08/fashion/08halfmill.html?_r=1&ref=business

Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-08 10:53:13

“Five hundred thousand dollars means taking their kids out of private school and selling their home in a fire sale.”

Cry me a f**king river.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 12:01:32

Sounds like Manhattan fire sales are on the way.

 
Comment by exeter
2009-02-08 13:14:05

Bantering,

My sentiments exactly. Here’s a deal for the money grubbing 28 year old banker in lieu of prison time that they so desperately need. Give them their $500k/yr and in return, they can do a tour of duty of the lowest of wage slave class. What is that you say?

Week1- Pull an 2pm-closing shift at a fast food joint.

Week2- Perform some work as a site laborer on a heavy construction site. Of course he must step up to his anti-working class, anti-collective bargaining rhetoric and work through his break, take a 17 minute lunch at 130pm and stay overtime 2 hours.

Week3- Perform work as a elder care/developmental aide. This includes changing adult diapers, spoon feeding, mopping up puke and allowing aggressive patients to spit on them without retaliation.

Week4- A farming dreamdate- Pull a sunup-sundown riding on the back of a baler stacking bales. And by gosh, you better keep up with that baler. And when the sun goes down, you got 600 cows to jerk. And when you’re completely exhuasted at 1am., you can take a shower and get 4 hours sleep.

Lather, rinse, repeat 12x.

Not until then will these creeps and their apologists develop some compassion and correct their own distorted vision.

Comment by bluprint
2009-02-08 14:24:44

riding on the back of a baler stacking bales.

Um, ex? Ever heard of round bales? Geez…get with the program old man. It’s the 21st century now. We do our farming in an a/c cab with a radio now adays.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by exeter
2009-02-08 15:19:17

You’re talking 10,000 operations. I’m speaking of 1000 or less.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2009-02-08 12:26:04

So….
… hire a renter!
:)

 
Comment by Rockin' in the free world
2009-02-08 19:20:04

Andrew Carnigie made his money and gave it away, these exec’s swindle others to make obscene paycheck. If they really can’t afford it, mabey they can go shack up with another one of their millionaire friends.

 
 
Comment by Jess
2009-02-08 09:13:33

Here in rural upstate S.C. we are further along in the ‘Depression” then many areas are.Our local Unemployment rate is 13% now.A Bent & Dent food Store that opened last week is Swamped,and they are cash only.Food Stamps are used by 1 in 6 folk here.This is Small town America,so folks do maintain their dignity and help each other out.
Most private House sales are dead in the water.About The only closings are Bank sales.You must put the money in escrow to bid.Here are a few recent deals locally.
A 1.5 acre country lot with nice 10 year old 28 by 70 DW.It sold to my friend for 13K.(the bank morgage on it was 54K).
A nice brick house on 1 acre.Asking price was 78K.Selling price was 28K.Another friend is even now offering a local bank 2K on an older restorable (Barely) house on 2 acres.The banker privately told him he’s good.
also ,our local regional Bank,Whom all were so proud of,and most have Shares in,is getting gutted,the Share prices dropped 85% recently.So much for listing on the big board up in N.Y..They would have been better off unlisted.
So,Cheer up, these prices are coming to your area soon.Depressions last for years,not months.

Comment by Lars39
2009-02-08 09:54:13

Yikes!

 
Comment by scdave
2009-02-08 10:35:08

What county Jess ??

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2009-02-08 09:21:31

Repost:

I am going to patch quotes together and make a bubble song for Ben. Please email me sound bites of you, or links to your favorite youtube NAr videos or whatever. Ben, I still need to know what your fav genre is, if you default, it will be noisy indie guitar/bass over an electronic beat (like CSI Miami music).

My email is x110y110 at gmail.

Send me anything, like NAR talking heads and stuff

Comment by hoz
2009-02-08 22:36:51

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6MdYSSjpkk&feature=related

If not Ben’s favorite genre, a close approximation. lol

Texas Tornados with Mr. Doug Sahm

 
 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-08 09:22:27

Friday, February 06, 2009
Who’s Messing with Wikipedia?

The back-and-forth behind controversial entries could help reveal their true value.

“…WikiDashboard shows which users have contributed most edits to a page, what percentage of the edits each person is responsible for, and when editors have been most active. A WikiDashboard user can explore further by clicking on a particular editor’s name to see, for example, how involved he or she has been with other articles. Chi says that the goal is to show the social interaction going on around the entry. For instance, the chart should make it clear when a single user has been dominating a page, or when a flurry of activity has exploded around a particularly contentious article. The timeline on the chart can also show how long a page has been neglected.

The page on Hillary Clinton, for example, shows that the main contributor has put in about 20 percent of the edits. Chi says this suggests that this individual has guided a lot of the article’s direction. In contrast, an entry on windburn shows a much less heated scene: more even collaboration among the contributors. …”

http://www.technologyreview.com/web/22076/page2/

As the government opts to be the editor of an entry then the government controls the direction of the slant. Now it can be traced. Since former President Bush’s page was the most edited, it will be interesting to see how much was done by the White House.

 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-08 09:26:15
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2009-02-08 10:08:37

Oh, thanks hoz, you reminded me that my 40 year high school reunion will be in mere 5 years…first job in the summer of 1974…working for a fastener company…that opened 1 year before the start of the GD 1 ;-)

 
Comment by darrell_in_phx
2009-02-08 10:42:09

Imagine if they didn’t use substitution and hedonic adjustment to underreport CPI…

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 12:19:45

That graph gives the depressive suggestion that we could be entering a period akin to 1973-1983, during which the rear view mirror perspective of the trailing decade’s results looked terrible for S&P500 investors on a near-continuous basis.

 
 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-08 09:30:14

http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/webfac/eichengreen/e210b_sp06/210b_syl_1-22-09.pdf

This semester’s class

Financial Crises in Historical Perspective
Economics 210B
Barry Eichengreen
Spring 2009
Department of Economics
Monday 12:00-2:00 p.m.
University of California, Berkeley
39 Evans Hall

Topic 1: Financial Crises–Overview
Topic 2: Bank Runs
Topic 3: Asset Prices and Financial Crises
Topic 4: Globalization and Financial Crises
Topic 5: International Contagion
Topic 6: The East Asian Crisis of 1997-98
Topic 7: The 2008 Credit Crisis
Topic 8: Crisis Resolution

Never to old to audit, I love the internet.

Comment by Blue Skye
2009-02-08 09:52:45

Hoz,

Is it free to audit the Berkley classes? it would be a hoot to tell my niece I took a class at her alma.

Skye

Comment by hoz
2009-02-08 10:04:55

Many of them are free and not only at Berkley but also at Yale, Harvard, U of Oregon and U Wisconsin among others. MIT offers almost 2,000 classes for free.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2009-02-08 09:58:15

Imagine a Sit-u-ation…where knowledge acquisition is not access based on location or qualification… Google & 500 giga bytes in the size of a box of animal crackers…it’s just those damn unexpected solar flares, that makes me keep those old foxfire books handy. :-)

Comment by scdave
2009-02-08 10:41:39

where knowledge acquisition is not access based on location or qualification ??

Yep….Bright hungry minds in the most remote of area’s will now have access…My hope is that it will make for a better world…

 
 
Comment by Blano
2009-02-08 11:14:21

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but this class sounds interesting. Do you have to actually sign up for this class somewhere to audit and get access to any other material, or do you just read what’s in the outline above?? Thanks in advance.

 
Comment by jane
2009-02-09 00:06:18

Hoz! Good Gracious, what a polymath you are!!! And you cast a VERY wide net! I am always impressed. And - OK - frankly, envious.

How on earth do you have the TIME and the BANDWIDTH to do the planting, the canoeing, the sledding, the Dewdrop Inn bonhomie, riding herd on your brood in planting matters, AND keep track of moment by moment fluctuations in relative values over twenty different asset classes??!!! AND letting us know about them all??!!

Give it up. Let us know. You have squeezed the juice, mashed the grapes, pressed the olives of life. You have jammed the experience of four lesser mortals into your one existence! That guy George Gilder, the guru who lapsed into oblivion after the tech crash, said “Time is the last frontier”. You have done gone broke whatever was left of his paradigm.

(By way of contrast, all I frickin’ do is work, read, walk my dog, and write motherly platitudes to my children, frequently with teeth on edge. And that takes me thirty hours a day.)

Is what you have viral, perchance? Could I come up and catch it, perchance? I could use some. How do I get to the Dew Drop Inn? Could you deliberately sneeze on me a lot? I’ll even buy the Leinies or that obscure rum or whatever.

Got that off my chest. Whew.

Seriously, I admire your bandwidth, and your compassion. I will do my bit and pray that karma pays you back with health, wealth, and friends and family who cherish you and are good company in a clinch.

 
 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-08 09:43:11

April 16, 2008
This Time is Different: A Panoramic View of Eight Centuries of
Financial Crises*
Carmen M. Reinhart, University of Maryland and NBER
Kenneth S. Rogoff, Harvard University and NBER
Abstract
This paper offers a “panoramic” analysis of the history of financial crises datingfrom England’s fourteenth-century default to the current United States sub-prime financial crisis. Our study is based on a new dataset that spans all regions. It incorporates a number of important credit episodes seldom covered in the literature, including for example,
defaults and restructurings in India and China. As the first paper employing this data, our aim is to illustrate some of the broad insights that can be gleaned from such a sweeping historical database. We find that serial default is a nearly universal phenomenon as countries struggle to transform themselves from emerging markets to advanced economies. Major default episodes are typically spaced some years (or decades) apart, creating an illusion that “this time is different” among policymakers and investors. A recent example of the “this time is different” syndrome is the false belief that domestic debt is a novel
feature of the modern financial landscape. We also confirm that crises frequently emanate from the financial centers with transmission through interest rate shocks and commodity price collapses. Thus, the recent US sub-prime financial crisis is hardly unique. Our data
also documents other crises that often accompany default: including inflation, exchange rate crashes, banking crises, and currency debasements.”

http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/rogoff/files/This_Time_Is_Different.pdf

caution 124 pg pdf

Comment by hoz
2009-02-08 10:20:29

And for investors of bonds this note from the paper:

“As we shall see when we tabulate individual country experiences in Section IV, serial default on external debt—that is, repeated sovereign default—is the norm throughout every region in the world, even including Asia and Europe.”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 11:57:41

‘We find that serial default is a nearly universal phenomenon as countries struggle to transform themselves from emerging markets to advanced economies. Major default episodes are typically spaced some years (or decades) apart, creating an illusion that “this time is different” among policymakers and investors. A recent example of the “this time is different” syndrome is the false belief that domestic debt is a novel
feature of the modern financial landscape.’

Luckily for us, this time is different.

 
 
Comment by cactus
2009-02-08 09:50:21

http://www.safehaven.com/article-12539.htm

Mauldin on the post bubble economy and how it looks like a summer 2009 market crash becasue of bad earnings and more write downs.

looks like he cahnged his mind about “Muddle through” and yes he is still pimping hedge Funds to high net worth individuals although I bet there are less of them to go around these days

Comment by polly
2009-02-08 11:48:19

Nope. He is still saying muddle through, but starting at a much lower level because of finally admiting it will crash more than he said at first. So, basically saying the whole economy will be the same L shaped thing that we all concluded will happen to house prices.

I enjoy his explanations of what has already happened, but I’m not very excited about the details of his forward looking conclusions. He does seem to admit to being wrong a little sooner than some of the others.

 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-02-08 09:55:06

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - Senators dug in Saturday to tidy up a sprawling $780 billion economic stimulus package that they hope to bring to a final vote in both the House and Senate by early next week.
[snip]
The Senate is now slated to vote Monday evening on a motion to limit debate, or “invoke cloture,” on the amendment containing the compromise version of the stimulus..

When threatened with WED (Weapons of Economic Destruction), it’s always best to spend first and ask questions later.

 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-08 09:55:56

Has anyone else read Steve Keen’s Roving Cavaliers of Credit?

 
Comment by ouro verde
2009-02-08 10:06:59

I can just see it now. The next job bubble will be in government jobs with an emphasis on realtors who work in a post office. It’s cold in those old buildings.

Comment by scdave
2009-02-08 10:47:09

The next job bubble will be in government jobs ??

Hell…We already have that bubble…The only difference is that bubble never bursts…It just gets bigger…

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 11:52:14

In the long run, all bubbles burst. For an example of how government jobs bubbles can burst, refer to the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Comment by ouro verde
2009-02-08 12:09:41

So instead of realtors driving a German car they get to buzz around in a blinking hybrid KIA.
Hey, I made myself laugh.
You need a new home go to the dept of realtor services….NO COMMISSION

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 13:16:57

Another example…

Judge: California furlough ruling doesn’t apply to elected officials
By Juliet Williams
Associated Press
Posted: 02/05/2009 10:35:44 AM PST

SACRAMENTO — A Sacramento County Superior Court judge on Thursday said his decision last week supporting furloughs for California government employees does not apply to elected officers.

That means that some 15,000 employees who work for constitutional offices, such as the attorney general, treasurer and school superintendent, will not have to take days off without pay.

Judge Patrick Marlette ruled last week that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has the authority to furlough other state employees. He has ordered them to take two days off a month without pay to help the state deal with a $42 billion budget deficit.

Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-08 16:02:48

We are steadily moving towards a revolution in this country. Unless the politicians start addressing the real problems, it seems anything but far fetched. People seem to ignore how quickly things can deteriorate.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by scdave
2009-02-08 22:15:21

Furloughs ARE NOT LAYOFFS…big DIFFERENCE AND JUST REINFORCES MY ARGUMENT THAT GOVERMENT DOES NOT CONTRACT…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by SdGuy
2009-02-08 11:38:04

“HUD Secretary: We must limit foreclosures”

http://money.cnn.com/2009/02/07/news/economy/willis_donovan/index.htm?postversion=2009020808

Checkout the poll next to the article.23% are looking to purchase.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 11:50:14

1. How low would home prices have to go before you’d consider investing in real estate?

10% lower 5%
20% lower 28%
I’m already looking 23%
I would not consider buying right now at any price 44%
Total responses to this question: 45175

Conclusion: No capitulation, yet.

 
Comment by Next Shoe To Drop
2009-02-08 12:28:53

I just voted for ‘no way in hell would I consider purchasing now’, especially in my area of Sunnyvale, which is still seeing over $800k listings on homes that 10yrs ago were going for $300k.

rob

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2009-02-08 13:29:53

Fannie, Freddie to channel mortgage rescue: sourcesFebruary 8, 2009 1:50 PM ET

All Thomson Reuters newsWASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration is crafting a mortgage-rescue program that would see Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ease payments for hundreds of thousands of borrowers and offer a model for Wall Street to do the same, sources familiar with the plan said.

 
Comment by NYCResident
2009-02-08 13:51:32

In the February 9, 2009 issue of The New Yorker, there is a story that is the most depressing read I’ve had in a long time. It covers the peak and aftermath of the bubble on Florida’s Gulf coast.

“The Ponzi State: Florida’s foreclosure disaster”

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-08 17:15:34

You just need to read more depressing stuff then. ;-)

Comment by Muggy
2009-02-08 18:50:51

One man’s “depressing read” is another man’s “Florida adventure.”

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-08 19:28:11

That would be me. I visit Florida “virtually” almost every week. ;-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-02-08 15:44:59

I did a quick check of homes for sale in my Phoenix neighborhood (Ahwatukee area of Mountain Park Ranch). Prices these days are 33% down from their peak in late 2006 / early 2007. Assumption: Incomes for the last 8 years have not gone up more than 2 and a half percent. One house in particular was zillowed in the $120s in 2000. So I figure it should be fairly valued at $155,000. It’s a 3 bedroom, 2 bath model over 1400 square feet far enough west of the I-10 and it seems to be a quiet area. Currently it’s for sale for $200,000 so I anticipate it needs to drop 25% more or incomes should go up 6% per year for seven years to catch up to the proper price of $200,000.

It’s good to see that there is progress in the bubble popping in a quiet area. I’ll have to check it out on http://www.rottenneighbor.com sometime.

 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-08 16:24:52

Mr. Geithner met with U.S. House Democrats Saturday at their three-day policy retreat in Williamsburg, Va., and told them the U.S. financial system remains “badly damaged,” said Rep. Brad Miller, a Democrat from North Carolina and a member of the House Financial Services Committee. “He said it’s clearly going to get worse but we have to act to prevent it from getting much worse,” Mr. Miller said.

The speech made it clear, Mr. Miller said, that the financial system remains fragile. “If we had regulators go in an examine the books like we did at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac a great number of our systemically important financial institutions could be insolvent.”

WSJ: Bailout Plan May Use Private Bank for Bad Assets

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 19:03:35

“…a great number of our systemically important financial institutions could be insolvent.”

Who audits the Fed’s books?

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2009-02-08 20:42:08

Didn’t it take several years to review their books when they were late with their quarterly reports? (Or maybe they just didn’t look)

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-08 17:25:23

Since January 13 the rate on standard long-term mortgages charged by lenders to prospective home owners has jumped from 5.04 per cent to reach 5.51 per cent on Friday, according to mortgage market analysts HSH Associates. The jump represents an almost 10 per cent rise in borrowing costs.

The rise was sparked by fears about the growing budget deficit and the continued appetite of foreign investors for US government debt. This has driven up the cost of debt in the form of mortgage-backed securities, raised by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

FT: US plan to curb mortgage rates falters

 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-08 17:31:37

The yield on 10-year US Treasury bonds – the world’s benchmark cost of capital – has jumped from 2pc to 3pc since Christmas despite efforts to talk the rate down.

Readers have berated me for a piece last week – “Glimmers of Hope” – that hinted at recovery. Let me stress, I was wearing my reporter’s hat, not expressing an opinion. My own view, sadly, is that there is no hope at all of stabilizing the world economy on current policies.

Telegraph: Bond market calls Fed’s bluff as global economy falls apart

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2009-02-08 18:01:57

http://cosprings.craigslist.org/wan/1023978498.html

I’m seeing more and more craigslist ads like this one, from a family trying to “get back on their feet,” then begging for a sectional couch and working TV.

Seems to me that sitting on your backside in front of an idiot box isn’t real helpful in terms of bettering your situation.

 
Comment by desertdweller
2009-02-08 18:07:43

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/08/realestate/08COV.html?em

Condo vs co op..
nyc is eyeing beginning of major defaults and co ops are now in better situation than condos.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-08 19:15:09

Depends.

I posted this about a year ago but both co-ops and condos took on major leverage in the form of ARM and option-ARM loans. These are delayed ticking time-bombs which will go off on them down the road.

I would want to carefully audit the books of anything before I went in there (not a freakin’ chance!)

There is a secondary bomb in terms of the tax abatements but that’s a small piece of the larger puzzle.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-02-08 18:23:28

Republican after Republican (except perhaps Ron Paul) keep saying the alternative to the Messiah’s pork barrel spending plan is to “shore up housing.” Price supports on houses are a nullification of contract law. How many other situations have you seen mainstream Republicans prescribe breaking contract law? They don’t have the cajones to say what Ron Paul is saying. I’m sure they know better but the cure is politically unfeasible. We know the cure is for government to get out of the way and not create any more bubbles by (loosening credit).

If we had a 20% savings rate per family, there would be no idiotic push for consumption and credit.

Personally I don’t know my credit score and I don’t give a darn. I wish most people would be able to say the same thing. We would not be this far into socialism.

 
Comment by ouro verde
2009-02-08 19:02:33

I’m scared to go to sleep tonight.
I hate being on the wrong side of the spending bill.
What if they announce that anybody with infestments must liquidate and donate?

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-08 19:18:16

Oh, grow up!

There are a lot of problems, and a lot of absurd people out there but this is not something I would even bother losing sleep over.

BORING. NEXT.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 19:20:51

“What if they announce that anybody with infestments must liquidate and donate?”

No need to worry about eventualities with near-zero probabilities.

 
 
Comment by ouro verde
2009-02-08 19:20:20

Oh pissy cat do you have your money overseas?

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 19:21:55

Why are you worried about confiscation? Have the Bolsheviks revolted but the MSM and the blog community both somehow missed it?

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-08 19:31:36

First, calm down.

Then, I will answer your questions as best as I can (inspite of your insults.)

Third, there is no great urgency to such things so let’s all drink some whisky and sleep on it.

Comment by ouro verde
2009-02-08 19:42:29

Yeah ok. Sorry.
Waking up is hard to do
and
California is in a messy state.

Comment by combotechie
2009-02-08 21:53:24

“California is a messy state.”

‘Tis but a flesh wound. It’ll all be over when the the state slides into the Pacific after The Big One. Or after the ocean raises it level high enough.

Either way, now’s the time to invest in Arizona beach-front property.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2009-02-08 22:20:03

:)

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-08 19:25:04

Part of the problem is that many companies built stockpiles last year in the face of surging prices for items such as steel and plastics. That goes against the principles of just-in-time production, which dictates holding minimum stocks of raw materials. But such hoarding makes sense when prices are rising.

That’s what happened at Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. in Snyder, Neb. Inventories at the fire truck manufacturer jumped 12% in the second half of last year, in part because the value of its inventories grew with inflation, but also because the company decided to buy a nine-month supply of paints and related chemicals in order to avoid a 10% price increase that came in October.

WSJ: Firms Race To Regain Control Over Inventories

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 19:39:25

How long can you hide oil production in excess of demand by literally keeping it afloat in ever-growing quantities?

Tanker serves as oil stockpile
Tamsin Carlisle
* Last Updated: February 07. 2009 6:41PM UAE / February 7. 2009 2:41PM GMT

A tanker, similar to this one in the Gulf, will be used as a floating storage depot for surplus oil. Chris Fletcher / AP

In the latest sign that energy producers are still pumping too much oil, Koch Supply and Trading, the US oil firm, has booked a supertanker for six months to store about 2 billion barrels of crude off the east coast of the Emirates.

The move to stockpile oil at sea near Fujairah, a Middle East fuel bunkering hub, is part of a worldwide trend towards offshore storage that has developed because onshore oil depots are full, and most oil traders expect prices to rise in coming months, analysts said.

But it also means global oil demand is falling faster than producing countries, primarily those within OPEC, are cutting output.

“Demand is so bad at the moment, where are you going to push the oil to?” asked a crude oil trader.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-08 19:41:35

Short MS.

They are they largest owners of these floating gonzo shows!

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 19:44:32

You have to be kidding. I thought they were a software company? What are they doing gambling in the commodities market?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-08 19:57:22

LOL — You guys are funny.

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-08 19:58:04

MS = Morgan Stanley.

Learn some ticker lore, prof!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 20:22:20

Outed as a dilettante (blushes…)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 20:26:14

But back to the business at hand: Did MS park TARP (Taxpayer Asset Rape and Pillage) funds in offshore black gold, on the assumption that inflation will bring them future riches? I hope the Somali pirates catch up to them soon.

Morgan Stanley CFO says firm eager to repay TARP
Fri Feb 6, 2009 9:37pm GMT
By Joseph A. Giannone

NEW YORK, Feb 6 (Reuters) - Morgan Stanley (MS.N: Quote, Profile, Research) wants to repay funds received under the U.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program as soon as it can and as early as the government will allow, Morgan Chief Financial Officer Colm Kelleher told investors in a Florida conference.

“We would like to repay TARP. I mean there’s no doubt about it,” Kelleher said, according to a transcript of his remarks at a Credit Suisse investor conference on Thursday. “And we are, like a number of other institutions, consistently looking at the ability to repay TARP.”

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-08 20:49:52

Yeah, they probably did.

And you have done me an inadvertent favor by bringing this fact to my attention. Someday (assuming I am right), I will be picking up the tab to a meal in San Diego with you. ;-)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-09 00:13:48

FPSS —

I seriously hope you make a ton of dough on the other side of stupid bets by too-big-to-fail firms armed with TARP gambling funds.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 19:43:22

Family grapevine report says SIL will file for BK and unload Wasatch Front McMansion on to extant glut. Not sure how the unloading will proceed, but she is deeply underwater. Within the span of 12 mos, she is out of a husband and out of a home. It is truly sad.

Comment by dude
2009-02-09 10:06:39

WF fall down go boom?

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-08 19:48:54

Administration officials said the plan to be announced Tuesday was likely to depend in part on the willingness of private investors other than banks — like hedge funds, private equity funds and perhaps even insurance companies — to purchase the toxic assets that wiped out the capital of many banks.

The officials say they are counting on the profit motive to now create a market for those assets. The government would guarantee a floor value, officials say, as a way to overcome investors’ reluctance to buy them.

NYT: In Bank Aid Plan, a Wall Street Focus

Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-08 19:52:07

A little more color from the Times article:

A possible model for the way the new Treasury plan could work would be the sale by Merrill Lynch in July of $31 billion in securities for 22 cents on the dollar. The buyer, the Lone Star group of private equity funds, put down only a quarter of the purchase price, and had the right to walk away, forfeiting only the down payment, if it later turned out the securities were worth even less than it agreed to pay. Thus Lone Star stands to receive the upside if the securities prove to be valuable, but has only a limited downside risk if they do not. In this case, it would be the government that stood ready to absorb losses if they were too large, and that provided some of the financing for the purchases.

Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-02-08 20:55:33

hmm.. bet on a grab bag of toxic waste.. but it’s “cheap”. At worst it would cost only about $100K to take control of $2M in assets.. with no upside limit.

This plan struck me as oddly familiar but i didn’t know why.. then it dawned on me.

In poker, we sometimes play terrible cards that belong in the muck.
But, you might have good table position. You might see your opponent as weak. Maybe you have lots of chips and think you can afford to gamble some. You might tell yourself that if you don’t flop a monster hand you’ll give it up.
And after all, we come to play.. Not to fold all day long waiting for good cards. There are many excuses.

Halfway through you’ve improved slightly, but you’re positive your opponent is much stronger, cause he’s is betting into you. You’ve got nothing right now.. but there’s always one more excuse to play further, like.. You’ve already “invested” a lot of money in the pot, and calling is “cheap” in comparison to giving up. So you call again. It’s a good way to go broke.

 
 
 
Comment by ouro verde
2009-02-08 20:14:44

Riots in Greenwich!

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-08 20:51:34

LOL

You wish!

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-08 20:19:08

Financial Times
US plan to curb mortgage rates falters
By Michael Mackenzie and Nicole Bullock in New York
Published: February 8 2009 23:35 | Last updated: February 8 2009 23:35

The US Federal Reserve’s efforts to drive mortgage rates lower by purchasing home loans have faltered and rates have risen over the past month.

The rise in rates is a disappointment to government officials, who had hoped that a steep fall in house prices and low financing costs would lure new buyers into the nation’s depressed housing market.

Since January 13 the rate on standard long-term mortgages charged by lenders to prospective home owners has jumped from 5.04 per cent to reach 5.51 per cent on Friday, according to mortgage market analysts HSH Associates. The jump represents an almost 10 per cent rise in borrowing costs.

The Fed has bought $92bn of mortgage securities since the start of the year under a plan that could see it purchase up to $500bn. The move is part of the US government’s efforts to stabilise the housing market, which include taking control of mortgage groups Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac last year, slashing interest rates to nearly zero and proposing modifications to existing loans that would prevent foreclosures.

The rise in mortgage rates follows an increase in interest rates, known as yields, that are paid on US Treasuries. In the US, 30-year mortgages are closely linked to the price of Treasuries.

Plans by the Treasury to raise $2,000bn in new debt over the 2009 financial year are driving yields on government bonds higher and complicating the Fed’s efforts to push mortgage rates lower.

 
Comment by ouro verde
2009-02-08 20:25:19

Rental Cramdowns just announced!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-09 00:10:11

Economies of bail cloud corporate decision making:

Wall Street Journal
GM in Talks to Take Back Part of Delphi

GM is in talks to take back large portions of Delphi as part of the auto maker’s strategy to line up more U.S. bailout funds.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-09 00:21:39

New York Times
Op-Ed Columnist
Slumdogs Unite!
by FRANK RICH
Published: February 7, 2009

SOMEDAY historians may look back at Tom Daschle’s flameout as a minor one-car (and chauffeur) accident. But that will depend on whether or not it’s followed by a multi-vehicle pileup that still could come. Even as President Obama refreshingly took responsibility for having “screwed up,” it’s not clear that he fully understands the huge forces that hit his young administration last week.

The tsunami of populist rage coursing through America is bigger than Daschle’s overdue tax bill, bigger than John Thain’s trash can, bigger than any bailed-out C.E.O.’s bonus. It’s even bigger than the Obama phenomenon itself. It could maim the president’s best-laid plans and what remains of our economy if he doesn’t get in front of the mounting public anger.

Like nearly everyone else in Washington, Obama was blindsided by the savagery and speed of Daschle’s demise. Conventional wisdom had him surviving the storm. Such is the city’s culture that not a single Republican or Democratic senator called for his withdrawal until the morning of his exit.

In New York, editorial pages on both ends of the political spectrum, The Wall Street Journal and The Times, called for Daschle to step down. But not The Washington Post. In a frank expression of the capital’s isolation from the country, it thought Daschle could still soldier on even though “ordinary Americans who pay their taxes may well wonder why Mr. Obama can’t find cabinet secretaries who do the same.”

As Jon Stewart might say, oh those pesky ordinary Americans!

So what about Geithner then? How come the guy who oversees the IRS gets a pass on not paying his taxes?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-09 00:30:16

Support for a hair-of-the-dog housing bubble hangover cure is swelling into a raging political torrent. Beware the law of unintended (and unpredictable) consequences.

P.S. Hint to financial wizards: It is hard to simultaneously subsidize both homebuyers and homeowners at the same time, as lower home prices favor would-be buyers and higher home prices favor current owners. However, if the main goal is to shovel more money into the bottomless REIC money pit, I am sure our Congress will find a way.

The New York Times
Both Parties Move to Aid Homeowners
By EDMUND L. ANDREWS
Published: February 3, 2009

WASHINGTON — Four months after Congress tried to rescue the economy with a $700 billion bailout for the financial industry, Republicans and Democrats are suddenly competing to bail out financially struggling homeowners.

Having spent hundreds of billions of dollars rescuing financial institutions, only to see the economy spiral even deeper into crisis, liberal and conservative economists and lawmakers are pushing to redirect the economic stimulus bill to what they say is the core problem: the housing market.

Senate Republicans are seeking new tax breaks and up to $300 billion in mortgage subsidies to attract homebuyers. Democrats want to spend at least $50 billion on federal programs aimed at reducing mortgage foreclosures.

The Obama administration is hammering out its own plan to spend $50 billion to $100 billion to prevent home foreclosures. And later this month, Democrats hope to pass a measure that would give bankruptcy judges the power to reduce monthly mortgage payments for homeowners who are in default.

There is a growing consensus among lawmakers in both parties that the deepening collapse of the housing market is at the heart of the country’s acute economic downturn.

But beneath the consensus over helping the housing market, there are huge differences over who should benefit under the competing plans. Democrats want to aim money directly at people in the greatest distress; Republicans want to aim money at almost all homebuyers, on the theory that a rising tide will eventually lift all boats.

Most people recognize that housing itself is at the root of the current economic downturn,” said Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Senate Republican leader. “We should fix this problem before we fix anything else.”

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post