February 12, 2009

Bits Bucket For February 12, 2009

Please visit the HBB Forum. Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

483 Comments »

Comment by Muir
2009-02-12 05:36:35

Remember the quaint old times in the HBB, oh around mid 06 or early 07, when it was common to hear posters complaint that watching the bubble bursting was “like watching paint dry?”
Or my all time favorite story, the guy that bought 100K+ of units in a virtual world on the Internet hoping to resell it later at a profit. He was that widower with a kid.

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 05:55:51

that virtual world stuff was crazy. knew someone who dropped out of school playing that crap (he was “too good” to trade items with other players on eBay for cash, though, so he went broke, too!).

I think the video game bubble is bursting, too. All of entertainment is in a vise right now.

Comment by Muir
2009-02-12 06:23:23

I do not remember all the details. I’m sure someone here does.
I was thinking about him last week as I was reading “Where are the customer’s yachts?”
It was a pitiful story, the guy had a settlement from his wife’s death and a very young kid, and instead of saving it or something, he bought this virtual reality property in this Internet game.
It was really sad.
I couldn’t get angry, I mean, I can get angry at, let’s say a poster here that I disagree with, because I know most here are intelligent and tough, this guy was just pitiful, here he was at the foot of Mount Vesuvius as it is erupting, and he kneels with his son to pray to a little statuette for salvation.

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-12 09:30:02

I must have become an obsessive reader of the HBB after that story appeared here, because I’d remember something that bizarre and something that sad.
That is terribly, terribly sad.
To me by far the worst thing of all this horrible mess is the innocent victims, and yes, there are some. There are a lot, in fact. These would NOT be the ones we hear complaining to reporters how they didn’t know what ‘negative amortization’ meant. Ain’t an ‘innocent victim’ to be found ANYWHERE there.
I mean the real victims; that’d be kids, pets, animals, you know—any of the helpless beings who couldn’t and can’t do anything but suffer for the idiotic choices made by those responsible for them, the supposed grown-ups who SHOULD have taken the best possible care to make prudent, long-term, rewarding choices, but who did not.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 09:47:15

That story is just absurd. I must’ve missed it.

+1 on the innocent victims. There have to be quite a few.

 
Comment by cassiopeia
2009-02-12 10:54:47

Innocent victims, this widower’s little child, Nadya Suleman’s 16 babies….

 
Comment by cassiopeia
2009-02-12 10:55:56

Innocent victims, this widower’s little child, Nadya Suleman’s 14 children….
Olygal, it would be interesting to get you ranting a little bit on that. It’s OT, I know, but I wouldn’t miss it for the world.

 
Comment by Muir
2009-02-12 11:33:46

Can’t believe you old timers didn’t read it.
Maybe it was earlier, but I know I read it here.


Found part of it.

Second Life
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Second Life (abbreviated as SL) is a Virtual World developed by Linden Lab that launched on June 23, 2003 and is accessible via the Internet. A free client program called the Second Life Viewer enables its users, called Residents, to interact with each other through avatars.

Land Ownership:
Main article: Real estate (Second Life)
Premium membership allows the Resident to own land, with the first 512m² free of the usual monthly Land Use Fee (referred to by residents as Tier, because it is charged in tiers). There is no upper limit on tier; at the highest level, the user pays US$195 for their first 65536m², and then US$97.50 per each additional 32768m² of land.[21] Any land must first be purchased from either Linden Lab or a private seller.


I’ll keep searching.

 
Comment by Muir
2009-02-12 11:40:19

Still searching but found this:

November 27, 2006 CNET
‘Second Life’ mints a millionaire?
by Daniel Terdiman

“It may be hard to believe, but apparently, the virtual world Second Life has produced its first millionaire.
According to a press release from Second Life real estate mogul Anshe Chung, also known by her real-world name, Ailin Graef, an initial $9.95 investment into an account in the virtual world has now been parlayed into a million dollars’ worth of in-world assets and currency.”

 
Comment by Muir
2009-02-12 12:19:28

(Still searching for the guy)

Here’s a video of what this was all about

cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=2496361n

And CNN/money/fortune

http://money.cnn.com/2007/01/22/magazines/fortune/whatsnext_secondlife.fortune/index.htm

If your grandkids ever ask you what this was all about….

 
 
 
 
Comment by Ben Jones
2009-02-12 05:56:44

Yeah, I remember thinking that if this was a bubble, it would shake up every household in the world.

Now that’s happening, what difference did it make that it took a while to fall apart? Actually, that just gave everyone more time to prepare. Not that the paint complainers did…

Comment by exeter
2009-02-12 05:59:35

BWHAHAHAHA! Paint sniffers and lighter fluid smokers.

Comment by Muir
2009-02-12 07:07:51

“Now that’s happening, what difference did it make that it took a while to fall apart?”

Made no difference… except…

“Actually, that just gave everyone more time to prepare.”

True. Very true.

“Not that the paint complainers did…”

That got a smile out of me.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 06:02:40

I’m sure I complained, and I prepared… it sucked for a while to be prepared (out of equities, for example) and watch those who didn’t still profiting. That came to an end, though, didn’t it?

Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-12 10:02:03

Don’t beat yourself up. It’s extremely difficult to pick tops or bottoms.

Man, I hope people are prepared. By that, I mean, at a minimum, credit cards paid off, at least 6-12 months living expenses saved, home sold (flexibility to move for work), pantry filled with dry goods, extended family relationships strengthened, less-is-more attitude adopted (you really don’t need 1/2 the junk), career setbacks and bare bones budget contemplated.

It’s going to be difficult for some people to take full advantage of rock bottom home prices. Minimal preparation, however, should at least allow them to catch the upswing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 11:13:46

yes, have done most of those preps except the pantry. ie: cleared all debts, saving like crazy, large emergency “should ING fail” fund in credit union, renting cheap, nurturing relationships, sticking to strict budget, developing work relationships & duties, and getting rid of/selling excess items

right before the foodstuffs upswing I was about to make a major move and there was no way in h@ll I was keeping flour and dry beans in a storage shed in the Florida summer

so pantry has been thin. but we have kept to our budget every month! so there–ha!

 
Comment by hd74man
2009-02-12 13:27:10

RE: Man, I hope people are prepared.

How about carrying $70k in your cowboy boots and stashing $4/5mil of gold bullion in Lebanon from the proceeds of a $100 mil mortgage scam.

All at the age of 27!

Personally, I’m rooting for the life in prison deal.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090211/ap_on_re_us/mortgage_scheme

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 15:12:15

SWEET!

Why did he bother to reenter the US?

 
 
Comment by reuven
2009-02-12 10:07:53

I think it came pretty suddenly. I would tell folks in Florida (my consulting business takes me there often) that one day, someone’s going to build a condo that won’t sell and that will be the beginning of the end.

And that’s basically what happened. There was a definite tipping point….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Michael Fink
2009-02-12 06:06:58

“paint complainers”

Did you mean to say “paint chip eaters”? :) That’s my favorite bubble term, every time I’m looking at houses with a RE agent I try to figure out just how many paint chips this guy/girl has eaten in the past few weeks.

 
Comment by palmetto
2009-02-12 06:37:11

Plenty of paint left to dry, IMO. The second wave of resets is on its way. But I’m wondering how much of that “second wave” has already experienced some attrition, from people who have already defaulted and/or walked away.

Comment by packman
2009-02-12 06:49:22

There’s some of that - though I’m willing to bet that a large portion of jingle-mail these days isn’t because of the resets (especially since LIBOR is so low still), but just by virtue of the home prices having now sunk so much - they’re off 40-50% in the more bubbly areas now.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by skroodle
2009-02-12 07:11:35

Don’t forget the 200,000 or people that got laid off last month.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2009-02-12 07:13:51

600,000

 
Comment by skroodle
2009-02-12 07:21:05

600,000? Dang…

 
Comment by packman
2009-02-12 09:04:20

Yeah that too. Puts a bit of a …. crimp… in the budget.

 
Comment by sfrenter
2009-02-12 12:49:13

Seemed like everything was slow to hit San Francisco, including the layoffs, but last night I went to a training clinic (for folks volunteering in the public schools) and out of 22 people present, 5 of them said that they had just been laid off and that’s why they had the time to volunteer.

San Francisco proper is economically different from the Bay Area as a whole: not only because people think it is but we do live in our very own island - ok penisula - but because despite the median income being about 58K. there are a sh*tload of really wealthy people.

Or are there? Maybe it’s been all for show. I guess we’ll find out soon enough.

Met a 32 year old biochemist last night, putting an offer on a SFH in the City, but not selling her SOMA condo so she can rent it out. Family money? Do biochemists make THAT much?

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 16:42:43

Leverage junkie.

 
 
Comment by james
2009-02-12 09:58:58

The updated Ivy Zellman graphs showing the wave of recasts and remaining resets says plenty of pain in 09-10-11. Then a lot of the damage will take time to manifest.

Also the modifications will continue to slow the rate of decline.

The demographics are also getting much worse every year.

I suspect we are in for a long long grinding deflation in housing. Prices will be about at the bottom in 2010-2011 except in some special locations.

Housing will probably be a neutral to poor investment till… I don’t know… maybe 2020.

Also expect changes in peoples attitude about debt will be changed for ever. Thrifty is going to be in.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2009-02-12 06:45:36

Reply to awaiting wipeout from yesterdays bits

Thanks Wipeout, I remember days in 06 and 07 doubting my decision and wondering if I had really screwed up. When those days happened I would come to this blog and read a whole days worth of posts and that would generally reinforce my decision not to jump off a financial cliff, kinda like going to an AA meeting for an alcoholic (which I am) who is near taking a drink after years of sobriety. On that note I should probably thank Ben for helping save not only my but my kids financial future.

Comment by ex-nnvmtgbrkr
2009-02-12 08:51:27

ALCOHOLICS ROCK!!!

………..eight years and counting.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-02-12 09:02:03

Great guys I did a AA NYE a few years back and it was really fun not dealing with the drunks.

Its funny i never got into the bar scene, i always wanted to be the dj or go see the band….so i never even got a dui dwi or even a warning….

 
Comment by jeff saturday
2009-02-12 09:02:21

21 year anniversary was in January, but I don`t Rock so much anymore. Anyway, congratulations on eight years!

 
Comment by wittbelle
2009-02-12 10:45:41

July 9, 2004. My last drinks were chilled sake and Soporro, (almost as good a combination as Patron and Corona).

 
Comment by exeter
2009-02-12 12:03:10

Christmas 1985 and hundred (maybe thousands) of hours walking the hopeless through the first 165 pages of Uncle Bills BB.

 
 
Comment by exeter
2009-02-12 09:29:08

Hey Junior,

Better crack that BB open and read those first 165 pages again.

Christmas, 1985…. and thousands of hours walking those who lost all hope through the steps.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-02-12 09:39:42

Jeff,
Thanks for confirming we’re not alone with the l o n g renting spell. I am sooo sick of it! I cannot believe how family and friends had downgraded us, until recently. This blog saved us too.

btw - In a Golden Girls episode, Rose (Betty White’s character) calls AA “Theatre Of The Living”. Miles, her boyfriend, takes her there for free refreshments and entertainment on dates.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2009-02-13 05:01:12

LOL! Great show!

We also relied on this blog to keep us strong during the really crazy days. Been renting for almost five years now, waiting…waiting…waiting…

There’s probably a lot more waiting ahead of us all, so let’s stock up on that popcorn and see what comes next.

 
 
Comment by reuven
2009-02-12 10:38:15

It interesting to compare alcoholism with spending addictions.

Alcoholism is a recognized medical condition. I tried goggling to find the numbers, estimates show that 9% of the population are “genetically predisposed” to it

AA claims to have 1,213,269 members in the US.

I’m speculating that there are at least 1,213,269 people in the US that have a similar miswiring of the brain that causes them to spend uncontrollably, even when it can hurt themselves, their family, or the Nation’s banking system and the economy.

I have a first cousin who’s a FB. All his life he’s spent beyond his means and is very “class conscious.” He works in a state job; his salary is published. Despite an income that’s about 25% of mine, he drives a leased luxury car, makes a big deal about his Rolex, etc. (I drive an economy car and don’t own a watch…but I have the opposite thing: I’m a spendthrift.)

Anyway, he decided he was a real estate expert. He bought a house in what he thought was an “up and coming” neigborhood, and took out a HELOC on his primary house (that he still had a mortgage on) to pay to improve it.

That was two years ago. He can’t sell it, the mortgage has reset, the teaser rate is set to expire. And he won’t face reality. He thinks if he can just borrow some money to get the house “staged” he can sell it. (”Sorry”, I told him. And since I live frugally, he doesn’t suspect I have any money!)

I feel bad for him, of course, but why should the Government bail him out? Would it kill him to live in an apartment and take the bus to work, while paying off his debt?

Bailing out people who get themselves into this situation, no matter how likable these people are, or how sorry we feel for them, would be as silly as buying alcohol for alcoholics. People who spend beyond their means, unless there’s some life-threatening situation, are mentally ill.

The reason I cited the numbers for alcoholism is that if there are a similar number of people whose brains are miswired for self-destructive spending behavior, that’s where all the money went!

If 9% of our population can’t handle money in a way that’s not self destructive, and were allowed to borrow money from banks that didn’t have adequate reserves, that’s our multi-Trillion dollar deficit right there.

Any bailout will be like pouring gasoline on a fire.

We’re doomed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ella
2009-02-12 18:24:56

“I have the opposite thing: I’m a spendthrift.)”

(just so you know, a spendthrift is someone who spends a lot, and is not thrifty.)

 
Comment by reuven
2009-02-12 19:44:24

Thanks! Now I know…

 
 
Comment by polly
2009-02-12 11:37:34

Respect and kudos to the clean and sober alcoholics and any others who read but don’t post.

(Was that OK? I didn’t want to sound condescending or anything. I thought that starting out with respect would help.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-02-12 14:40:18

jeff saturday-
Thanks for your nice reply. No, you’re not alone. I am sooo sick of thing renting waiting game myself. I concur, about this HBB community. It helped me keep my sanity and save face with myself, too.

btw, There is a Golden Girl episode where Rose (Betty White’s character) talks about Miles (her boyfriend) taking her to AA meetings. “Theatre Of The Living he calls it, and they serve free refreshments, too”. She was discussing what a cheapskate he was. It was quite funny.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by jeff saturday
2009-02-12 15:42:04

Kudos to my fellow friends of Bill ex-nnvmtgbrkr,wittbelle and exeter. Also thank you polly and speaking for myself you would have to do a lot better than that for me to be insulted.

Not wanting to go all program on anyone or anything, but this was something that helped me out 21 years ago that some of you may have never seen. Hope this doesn`t offend anyone, but if it does I am sorry.

The Serenity Prayer
God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Living one day at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time;
Accepting hardships as the pathway to peace;
Taking, as He did, this sinful world
as it is, not as I would have it;
Trusting that He will make all things right
if I surrender to His Will;
That I may be reasonably happy in this life
and supremely happy with Him
Forever in the next.
Amen.

–Reinhold Niebuhr

I learned a lot from AA and I have learned a lot from the people on this blog.

Thanks Jeff

 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2009-02-12 08:03:04

What do you mean by “prepare?” I worked my way through several difficult college degrees. I moved for schools and jobs. I lived well within in my means. I earned a high FICO by paying off all my debt except 5K left on my cheap and decidedly un-egotistic car. I didn’t buy a house or expensive toys or rent a house in the Hamptons for $75K/summer. I tried to keep my job (couldn’t). I had to take some risk in investing because I need to retire eventually, I don’t have $250K lying around gathering dust, and banks simply don’t hand out 7% for CD’s anymore. I just wanted a reasonable house at a reasonable price which I could pay for with a reasonably stable job. And I still got hit.

But evidently, this is not enough to escape the HBB guilt trip. I got slammed yesterday because I was stupid enough to buy into a 401K. Now I’m getting slammed for not preparing. I guess the only way to become even moderately successful is to be a broker, be it hedge funds on the upside or foreclosures on the downside. Non-money-pushing careers need not apply.

waits to be slammed yet again in 4….3….2….1

Comment by DinOR
2009-02-12 08:27:45

oxide,

Perhaps from others but not from me. I’m not sure I follow where all this “preparedness” is coming from? I played everything more or less in conformance w/ the general consensus shared here and I uh… don’t f-e-e-l like a “winner”?

It kind of reminds me of all the training we got back in the service “preparing” for an NBC Attack. ( Nuclear Biological Chemical ) Great “tips” like how to clear the vomit from your goggles and inject any of the survivors w/ a foot long needle filled w/ serum that’s almost as bad as the affliction? ‘That’ kind of preparedness?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2009-02-12 08:41:13

Hey, don’t feel sorry for getting into a 401K, you are not alone. It sounds like you started off better prepared than most people get by trying. Hopefully you are not a slave to debt. That is the best preparation these days.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by packman
2009-02-12 09:11:26

OK - not sure what all the hubbub was yesterday (I won’t bother looking) - but WTF is wrong with 401k?

In general 401k - if they are company matched - are a no-brainer. They’re indeed quite inflexible (most have only 10-15 investment options, and you can’t do individual equities, etc.), but you can’t beat 50% gain right off the bat. You can still go conservative - I did two years ago. I was down 20% last year, but since company match was 50% that equates to about a 30% gain - how many other investments performed so well last year?

Now contributing non-matched funds to 401k - that’s just not smart IMO. You can get gains that are just as good or better in other options, even accounting for the (very limited) tax benefits of 401k, and also your money wouldn’t be locked up until retirement.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by In Montana
2009-02-12 11:02:40

Now contributing non-matched funds to 401k - that’s just not smart IMO.

Ahem, well wait just a dern minute here. It’s still a tax shelter of sorts. I put away about 12K a year this way - 6k at work and 6k in a trad IRA. It’s been in cash reserves since 11/7 and what I’m losing is due to inflation but right now it doesn’t feel too bad. In fact I feel richer every day.

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 11:22:40

Oxide and Montana:

I *would* have maxed out Roth IRA and 357B, BUT:

all of the 357(b) plan options SUCKED BAWLS

so I took that money and invested it w/out any tax benefits (after maxing out my Roth)

so I paid taxes on my gains BEATS LOSING IT

If I had a “real job” instead of this blue collar gig I probably wouldn’t spend a lot of time thinking about investing. I would try to KISS. Nothing wrong with that. However, my income is low, got to get it up somehow. I can’t afford to mess up.

I guess I was harsh yesterday, but I kind of feel like if you were ‘relying’ on that 401k then you should have done more due diligence … and if you have $500k that went down to $350k … relax … some of it will come back. And COL should come down in the mean time for what doesn’t. And everyone else will be in the same boat. And yields on bonds should be up in due course. So there is no need to whine in this situation.

But if it was $100K and you *needed* that money… ouch. Sorry to be harsh, man, but again, if you’re counting on it, you need to be more on top of it.

 
Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-12 12:22:15

“Sorry to be harsh, man,…”

She’s a lady. Be kind to ladies.

 
Comment by oxide
2009-02-12 13:18:32

Ah, OK thank you. I feel much better now. For a second I thought you were dumping on me for not being a commodities trader/short seller/goldbug/bottom feeder in addition to my regular job. :-)

(For the record, yesterday Not A Gator said that I deserved to lose money because I “gave up control of my money” to 401 K managers.)

I only did the 401K company match. As for the rest, I had a fair bit in money market (wooo), some of it I had in bonds (house downpayment, OK), and some play money in post tax retail sector funds (oops.) I’m young and don’t have much, so you could say I’m “relying” on ALL of that money. I guess we’re all screwed, but some less than others.

 
Comment by SaladSD
2009-02-13 01:22:47

Any time you have a group gathered around an idea or philosophy, even this here HBB which is refreshingly diverse, you’re going to run into the self-righteous. Aspiring to be The most “perfectly prepared” is like keeping up with the Joneses.

 
 
Comment by hd74man
2009-02-12 11:01:34

RE: I guess the only way to become even moderately successful is to be a broker,

Nah, you need go be a state or muni government Gestapo badge wearer, hose hauler, or teacher’s aide snot wiper, so when your public employee union busts the budget of the local community, the POS mayor, who signed off on the financially ruinous contract to begin with, runs to the Federal government for $54 billion in bail-out money to escape the political heat of public safety lay-off’s.

Guaranteed income and health care for life, with no threat of lay-off; all paid for by all the moron idiots and dolts working in the private sector.

Talk about a made in the shade existence.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by DinOR
2009-02-12 15:06:37

hd74man,

About sums it up. When you look at the amt. of the StimPac that’s going to bail out states, you could just cry. What’s more sad is that these clowns are no longer the flunkies we once ‘thought’ they were?

They have power and pull. They have really nice and homes and make big, big decisions involving lots of money. State and local pols are now on a level of “take” that Spiro T. Agnew and others couldn’t even have imagined in the 60’s & 70’s. They’ve all moved up a notch.

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 15:57:54

governors of Illinois, Conn., NJ within last few years, and then there’s Sarah Palin.

sooo… yeah.

 
 
 
Comment by SV guy
2009-02-12 09:27:05

I have been preparing for a long time. Many years pre-bubble.

I’m in Montana now looking at properties. Going to take a snowmobile ride to look at a large chunk of land. :)

I’ll update later.

Mike

P.S. I love the smell of desperation in the morning.

Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-12 10:17:23

It’s waaaay too early in MT- especially land.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Kim
2009-02-12 09:03:24

‘Remember the quaint old times in the HBB, oh around mid 06 or early 07, when it was common to hear posters complaint that watching the bubble bursting was “like watching paint dry?”’

Actually, it still feels that way here in Chicagoland sometimes. Just the other day Ben posted an article indicating prices in certain suburbs have only declined 10%, and that’s pretty representative of this area. There is a long way to go here.

That being said, “watching paint dry” is much more fun than watching people’s savings and jobs disappear.

 
Comment by az_lender
2009-02-12 10:50:42

Here in Morro Bay, the paint is still pretty damp. Median may be down 20% from top, but it is indeed one of those places where people bring their retirement savings and buy for cash. The foreclosed homes are inland of the freeway and very tiny. At some point it will make sense for me to buy a house, rent it out in summer (when I’m in Maine), and live in it in winter. At this point not. I have a friend who teaches at Cal Poly SLO, has a decent salary, but also has too much sense to borrow $400K. I told him another year might bring something within his reach.

Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-12 11:27:31

Wow, 20% is pretty significant, IMO. I’d say the paint is dry, and starting to crack.

Comment by SLO_renter
2009-02-12 14:51:37

After a nearly 300% run-up over the course of six years or so, a 20% reduction is a drop in the bucket (of drying paint).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SLO_renter
2009-02-12 14:55:54

To get specific, here in San Luis Obispo, people were asking 500K for tear-downs at the peak of the boom. Now, there are some SFH selling in that range.

But 500K is still a lot of money, especially as local median family incomes have declined from around 65K to around 50K in the past few years, and most of the inventory for under 500K consists of condos.

500K is still quite a bit of money (even if less than the 600K-plus that was being asked for SFH in San Luis at the peak).

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 16:09:09

But 75% would get you back to parity (or actually below with dollar devaluation)

20% drops for 6 years will also get you back to parity. Won’t take this long, I think, because drops seem to accelerate on the way down.

Who was it, maybe Prof Bear was talking about a CA local with $15K median drops per month, every month that is a higher annualized percentage loss.

 
Comment by SLO_renter
2009-02-12 18:14:40

I hope it does not take six years, not-a-gator. There are advantages to renting, but it would be nice to have the choice.

 
 
 
Comment by SLO_renter
2009-02-12 13:17:01

The paint is still damp in San Luis Obispo, too - even a bit damper than in Morro Bay, it has seemed to me, as I have seen some nice places that we can’t afford at lower prices in Morro Bay as compared to the nice places we can’t afford in San Luis Obispo . . . .

 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-02-12 05:37:16

It’s Official:

We have NO leaders in America…They spend all this money to make banks solvent, and then have no solvent customers.

Comment by skroodle
2009-02-12 07:13:59

According to Bloomys ( http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aP6xr9LsyklY&refer=home ) CEOs are already wanting to refuse TARP money in order to keep their bonuses.

Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-02-12 08:46:08

CEOs are already wanting to refuse TARP money in order to keep their bonuses.

Self-immolation still clears out the deadwood, I reckon.

 
Comment by oxide
2009-02-12 13:23:57

GOOD!!! :-D

And when they tell their stockholders they would rather BK the company than give up their house in the Hamptons, I’m gonna watch with popcorn.

Comment by polly
2009-02-12 14:40:13

It will at least break this ridiculous myth that giving people oodles of stock options is the best (and only) way to get people to do a good job managing a large business. Also that if the stock options go under water that you have to lower the strike price to keep them motivated.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by measton
2009-02-12 20:24:04

It will at least break this ridiculous myth that giving people oodles of stock options is the best (and only) way to get people to do a good job managing a large business.

+1

It is the best way to get CEO’s to manipulate the price of their stock before they sell it. They should get stock but they should have absolutely no say in when they sell it.

Recent Business week article

In recent weeks, the news from Japan Inc. has been a steady drumbeat of layoffs, plant shutdowns, and gloomy earnings forecasts. Yet few CEOs have been shown the door. And there are scant signs that the public and political outcry against CEOs’ fat pay packages in the U.S. will be echoed in Japan.

That’s because most Japanese chief executives don’t earn anywhere near the big paychecks of their Western counterparts. CEOs at Japan’s top 100 companies by market capitalization earned an average of around $1.5 million, compared with $13.3 million for American CEOs and $6.6 million for European chief execs at companies with revenues of higher than $10 billion, according to an analysis of 2004-06 data by Towers Perrin, a Stamford (Conn.) human resources firm.

Of course business week went on to say that Japanese companies should modle their pay packages after the US.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Mole Man
2009-02-12 10:26:13

Official? No leaders? What are you even talking about? The banks got operating capital when it became clear their problems with bad assets were off the charts. Solvency problems remain, most especially with Sillybank which may yet choke on its just deserts. How exactly are politicians supposed to fix everything? Please explain the steps and your reasoning in detail.

Comment by az_lender
2009-02-12 10:53:48

It was interesting yesterday watching all the bankers in front of Frank’s committee saying they would not need any TARP 3. The most honest one was Jamie Dimon, who said of Morgan Chase, “If we do need more later, I won’t be the one asking.”
(I.e., he’ll be outa there if he can’t return it to profitability.)

Comment by measton
2009-02-12 20:25:03

“If we do need more later, I won’t be the one asking.”
(I.e., he’ll be outa there if he can’t return it to profitability.)

Yep outa there with a giant golden parachute I imagine.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2009-02-12 11:27:16

Sillybank — that’s a good one!

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-02-12 11:45:32

Easy…..Big DEAL you have solvent banks what about solvent customers?

s#itty bank wanted to get rid of me after 18 years why? uh idunno their computer said so….and raised my cc rates to 24% last month never ever been late in 18 years…so it was a shock

so in order to get it back to 7% i had to sever relations with S$ittybank when my card expires..no renewal…after 18 years….

They purposely want you to default and they will get paid 100% from Tarp money is my guess

Now if we really cared about Americans, the way to get money into the hands of us fast is to lower the principle on a Card $1000 or drop interest to 0% for 5 years….that would make money available today not next year

100 million CC x $1000 principle reduction = $100 Billion chump change….

 
 
 
Comment by cobaltblue
2009-02-12 05:37:21

Another upbeat guy heard from:

Deluge of Financial Calamities Looming by Mid-March
By Patrick A. Heller, Market Update
February 10, 2009

As horrible as the financial news for currencies and paper assets has been since mid-2007, it looks like the worst is yet to come - perhaps as early as next month.

Over the weekend the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Dominique Strauss-Kahn, told a gathering of Southeast Asian central bankers that the world’s advanced economies are already in a depression and that the financial crisis may deepen unless the banking system is fixed.

On Febr. 4, Paul Wolfowitz, the former president of the World Bank, said the IMF and similar institutions are incapable of coping with the global financial crisis because they do not have enough resources.

The market appears to have turned on U.S. Treasury debt. Analyst Adrian Douglas issued a report on Sunday titled “Bond Market Collapse Unfolding.” He used his proprietary Market Force Analysis on the price of the 10-year U.S. Treasury Note. Last September and October, as the value of Treasury debt was falling, it looked almost certain that the U.S. Treasury entered the market to purchase its own debt! This had the effect of boosting the price of Treasury bonds.

However, the futures market for 10-year Treasury debt shows that there have been far more sellers than buyers for more than the past six months, a strong sign that bond prices are destined to decline in the near term. For the past eight weeks, Treasury bond prices have indeed been generally declining (i.e. interest rates have been rising). The U.S. government is almost certain to intervene again, as the Treasury debt is the most important in the world, and whose collapse could wreak havoc across the global financial system.

The problem is that the U.S. government is going to have to float massive additional amounts of new Treasury debt in order to immediately finance the second $350 billion of the bank bailouts and the nearly trillion dollars for the new so-called “economic stimulus” program. If almost everyone else is selling and the U.S. Treasury is the primary buyer of its own outstanding bonds, who is going to buy the newly issued debt?

Non-precious metals prices may have also passed their bottom. The price of copper recently jumped as much as 10 percent in a single day, for example.

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 05:58:18

maybe time to get in on all commodities (except farm products). Flucht in die Sachwerte!

quick… what’s a good website to get started with commodities trading? I know nothing… asked my great aunt who owns a lot of stocks, she said her brother did all that, and he’s dead. dammit.

Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-02-12 06:50:24

i hope you’re kidding.. nobody makes money in commodities except the established pros, all of whom have the necessary contacts and resources. On top of that newbies are routinely swindled.
Why not pick something with better odds. Roulette offers nearly 50/50.

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 11:25:02

TRACKRS was supposed to kind of spread the risk around…

Jim Rogers was pimping something but I don’t know if it closed or what.

Need to look into it again.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-02-12 12:23:03

Spread the risk? What’s the point of playing commodities if you don’t take advantage of their most appealing aspect: The chance to strike it rich. Leverage to the max.. willingly accept a hundred small losses in the hopes of snagging one or two huge gains.

As long as you know you’re pitifully out-gunned by the pros, and that nothing will lift you to their competitive level (because they are insiders.. with access to huge companies who monitor everything that’s happening around the world, from labor relations to the weather to shifts in a country’s political climate, in order to predict and adjust to changes in the markets before they happen, and so keep their raw materials costs as low as possible).. go ahead and have some fun.. maybe make some money.

Google “virtual commodity trading” .. pick a site, set up an account and play around. It might be your thing.

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 16:16:17

Oh I see what you’re talking about … uh huh … had a coworker who was into that stuff …

no, not for me … my cortisol levels are already elevated … more like “h-ll to the no” as we like to say around the Dispatch window…

Naw, I was talking about taking long-term positions in commodities. There are some instruments out there to do this. The easiest to get into are (obviously) gold, then oil, then probably silver. Made no money on silver, obviously not a good enough trader. Made easy money on gold (but was stupid enough to do it in my taxable account-D’OH!). Avoided oil because I didn’t know when the mania would end or where the bottom was. Now I think I know where the bottom is. (I messed around with DUG last year, but I was too early.)

 
 
 
 
Comment by darthrealtor
2009-02-12 07:45:18

Paul Wolfowitz….there’s a name I never want to hear again. Yuck.

Comment by Skip
2009-02-12 09:13:38

I remember the scene from Fahrenheit 9/11 where he licked his comb before putting it in his hair. Yowza!

Comment by exeter
2009-02-12 09:35:18

There is a noose prepared for Wolfowitz.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ACH
2009-02-12 17:03:36

He’s been dipped up to his eyeballs in blood and doesn’t care. Noose? You might be doing him a favor.

Roidy

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 05:51:52

Hey, I think I asked my question too late last night in Bits:

If I wanted to buy some oil as insurance against a drop in the US dollar, how best to go about that, short of trading oil futures? I’m looking at USO and OIL leaps.

Is there some systemic risk in trading USO or USO options, or am I just being paranoid?

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-12 06:28:42

Well, others here know far more than I, but FWIW I’ve been closely following UCO (2x oil up) lately. But I’m just playin’ with a spec account - nothing serious. It fell through $8 yesterday, and might nibble if it does so again today. It’s a new one, and 2x, but again - this is playin’.

 
Comment by Rancher
2009-02-12 07:16:37

http://www.nymex.com, buy future contracts.

 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 07:37:35

Didn’t like my answer last night. Ok

Comment by whino
2009-02-12 07:46:40

I liked your answer and have already started preparations for entry in the future.

Comment by whino
2009-02-12 07:48:10

oops, forgot to add, Thanks!!! I always enjoy your insight!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ella
2009-02-12 10:29:22

me, too.

 
 
 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 11:29:27

Oops, I’m sorry hoz. I went to bed at 2130EST and assumed that was too late for a response. Here it is:

Paranoid, no. All reasonable questions.

The average price of oil traded in the US is currently $48/bbl. The NYMEX deals in oil at Cushing, OK. ever hear of it?

“Delivery
F.O.B. seller’s facility, Cushing, Oklahoma, at any pipeline or storage facility with pipeline access to TEPPCO, Cushing storage, or Equilon Pipeline Co., by in-tank transfer, in-line transfer, book-out, or inter-facility transfer”

Cushing can handle 2MM bbls/day with total storage of 44MM bbls.

USO is tied to front month Cushing NYMEX futures. There are no storage spaces left to hold the oil. It is one reason why prices are higher overseas - fewer oil tankers to transport.

Oil appears to be historically cheap relative to other essential commodities. If the Hoteling rule is to hold at some point in the near future the price of oil should reflect scarcity. Each dollar drop causes more and more producers to shut off marginal wells from Southern Illinois to Canada. At this price Canada should shut down all tar sands as cost ineffective.

USO is an excellent play for a longer term investor. I do not pick bottoms, oil might go to $10 (although, I think it won’t). I know that in 5 years oil will be closer to 200 than to 50. Ergo an investment of $26 will result in a nominal 400% profit over the next 5 years.

Didn’t mean to be a douche. VERY HELPFUL–THANK YOU.

And no, hadn’t heard of Cushing, OK. My folks are from Bartlesville (Phillips people, although great aunt worked for Conoco… no, seriously… big rivalry there until Conoco bought them out) but I’ve never heard of Cushing.

Comment by dude
2009-02-12 16:50:51

FWIW, I agree with Hoz on this. My strategy is to use USO as an inflation hedge. I plan to buy calls of expiry one year out each spring at strike of double the current spot. It seems an easy money bet at this point.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by exeter
2009-02-12 05:56:58

More Marketwatch.com fun.

Foreclosures up 18% in Jan09.

http://tinyurl.com/aqc7dg

Comment by Blano
2009-02-12 07:01:24

Whatever happened with your email exchange with that realtard?? Ever hear back from him again??

 
Comment by az_lender
2009-02-12 11:04:48

I noticed yesterday that govt is begging banks to postpone all new foreclosures till it (govt) announces its new FC-mitigation program. These postponements may (?) serve to keep the market more orderly (not a bad thing), but so far, every postponement ends with a loud pop — sudden increase in FCs. For example, if Fan/Fred moratorium has now ended, this will be a big FC month.

Comment by Don't Know Nothin About Buyin No House
2009-02-12 13:02:41

Ben is out there dealing everyday with the realities and I often think about his claim that it’s all about contract law. I then consider how likely it is the equivalent of the Divison of Motor Vehicles will execute any monetary programs to speedily support contract law?

What about all the homeowners no longer paying their mortgage, some for a year now, that have not even had a foreclosure proceeding against as bank is too overloaded to even process proceedings?

You, Ben and others are close to things, and look forward to hearing what trends you are seeing.

 
 
 
Comment by Jess
2009-02-12 06:00:31

Stock up on ”Forever’ First class stamps before May.They’ll be jumping 2 cents then.That’s maybe the best small investment for now.In a year or two letters may cost a buck to send by snail-mail.

Comment by samk
2009-02-12 07:13:44

I don’t use stamps these days. I just pay all my bills online. If I need to talk to someone it’s email or phone. If all those things become unusable I don’t think I’ll be too worried about sending mail.

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-12 12:10:04

Well if you have any complaints you want to register with United Airlines, they are only accepting complaints by e-mail or letter. No longer by phone.

Comment by ella
2009-02-12 13:04:06

United Airlines conducts the most terrifying flights in the history of aviation.

Seriously. I have flown Aeroflot and I never thought I would experience such sheer, falling-apart-plane terror. But now I have flown United. I will never step into another one of their planes if I can help it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Sagesse
2009-02-12 14:09:15

Ella, this is not my experience, about United. US Air much worse, in my opinion. I have flown aeroflot in 87, Bangkok via Moscow to Fra. Baggage compartments could not be closed, they were open like on a bus. Flight attendants deposited rye bread and caviar on your tray, then you did not see them anymore for the rest of the flight. Plane may curve around a lot, it’s unpleasant, but most likely it’s due to crowded skys / weather, I think.
I prefer United over all other domestics except Jetblue.

 
Comment by Kim
2009-02-12 14:51:51

United is really route-specific. I’ve had both my best and worst flights on United.

 
Comment by goirishgohoosiers
2009-02-12 15:10:36

Flew Scareoflot from London to Moscow in ‘87. I especially liked the part when we first got up in the air and could hear the plane creaking from the metal fatigue. In flight drink choices consisted of “mineral water” which was basically carbonated Soviet tap water with floating things in it or room temperature Pepsi.

The descent was a trip too. Later I’d heard that the pilots were all Afghanistan vets who learned they had to land at a sharp angle to avoid the missile fire. Apparently they just transferred this skill to their careers as civilian pilots.

 
Comment by Julius
2009-02-12 18:31:44

That bad? Damn

 
Comment by ella
2009-02-12 18:44:52

Ha, well you win with scarier stories! OK, maybe I was exaggerating just a tiny bit.

The last United flight I took, one of the wings was dented, we had to switch planes 3 times before getting off the ground for “mechanical difficulties” and then before we took off the control panel froze and the pilot said, helpfully that “we have to reboot it, like when your computer freezes and you hold down ctrl-alt-delete”. Comforting.

As we were taxiing down the runway he said, “sorry for all the delays, but today was a disaster, it’s just a bad day.” Which is exactly what I like to hear as I am leaving the ground :) . Also, several of the little monitors that drop down randomly popped up and down during the safety presentation and there was a flickering light over us the entire flight. The seat next to me was ripped open, so you could see inside. It was like flying a greyhound. We had mad turbulence, too, but that wasn’t the scary part. The lady next to me actually prayed out loud for 2 hours. Never again.

“Baggage compartments could not be closed, they were open like on a bus.”

Ooh, that is scarier.

“In flight drink choices consisted of “mineral water” which was basically carbonated Soviet tap water with floating things in it.”

That’s what I remember, too! We took several flights while we were there (I was with a parent, conducting research for a story on Glasnost and emerging business opportunities, so we had to visit several regions) and the water changed flavours depending on which region. They said it was different regional “mineral waters”. The water seemed to served in plastic flowerpots, too. There were flies on the plane, that was new. (Flies stay still when you are in the air, in case you wondered.)

 
 
Comment by Chip
2009-02-12 19:20:46

Sounds like none of y’all have flown Air Afrique. There is/was another one - I think CFA or similar. Once had a drunk cabin crew on one of them. Once flew Nigerian into a sub-city during a sandstorm - pilot landed on the right set of wheels in heavy wind and then learned/figured out he was on the wrong runway and goosed it to get up and around again.

There are a lot worse experiences available than United or Aeroflot.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by skroodle
2009-02-12 07:25:46

If it gets rid of all the junk mail I find in my box every day, I will gladly pay $2 a stamp(all though 5 day a week service would be a better idea in my book).

Comment by sfrenter
2009-02-12 13:26:26

I signed up for this service called greendimes (google it). One time fee ($15 or $20) and all my junk mail is gone.

Great service.

Comment by Laurel, md
2009-02-12 14:20:38

Be very carefull using greendimes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2009-02-12 07:54:09

Stock up on ”Forever’ First class stamps before May.They’ll be jumping 2 cents then.That’s maybe the best small investment for now.In a year or two letters may cost a buck to send by snail-mail.

I bought about 10 years worth of forever stamps right before their very first price increase (a few years ago). I use around 2 or 3 per month, so you are right that it was a very small investment. But it was a very good one.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2009-02-12 08:56:09

I like to buy small lots of junk collectible stamps, and practically cover the front of the envelope with them. It’s a good inflation visual.

Comment by cactus
2009-02-12 11:17:25

“I like to buy small lots of junk collectible stamps, and practically cover the front of the envelope with them.”

My Uncle does that and its hilarious

Comment by X-GSfixer
2009-02-12 15:02:47

Maybe Blue Skye Is your uncle………:)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-02-12 06:06:47

I see the 15% tax credit for home buyers was eliminated from the new boondoggle relief attempt. Gonna be some pissed off NARs, they were hanging big hopes on it.

Comment by wmbz
2009-02-12 06:07:58

Meant $15,000.00 credit.

Comment by scdave
2009-02-12 10:21:23

Current Bill reduced it to $8,000. I believe..

 
 
Comment by Michael Fink
2009-02-12 06:11:46

Yeah, I saw that too, it’s been cut in 1/2 and it’s only for new home buyers (as in, never owned a home before?).

Anyway, even though I would stand to directly benefit from such a program, I am VERY happy that it didn’t go through with a 15K number on it. And the one they did pass sunsets very quickly, which is also good. All these programs are encouraging people to get back into the market; and, given that we’ve not yet hit a bottom, prolonging the inevitable. I would be happiest if they removed all the credits, and raised interest rates to 6-8% (not the FFR, just raise the FFR high enough to get 30 year fixed loans to 7% or so). I HATE the idea of buying when rates are at historic lows (they have nowhere to go but up; when they go up, the price of housing falls), and even more hate the idea of taking a temp govt handout (when the handout is gone, prices will fall further to offset the loss of buying power).

The best time to buy a house when interest rates are high-ish, no stimulus, and, of course, everyone is telling you not to do it! :) When you buy with interest rates at historic lows, stimulus out the whazoo, and everyone telling you this is the bottom… Well, you’ve got nowhere to go but down.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-12 06:33:19

“The best time to buy a house when interest rates are high-ish…”

I’ve been noticing lately on some local RE blogs that today’s knifecatchers, and the bagholding shills and agents pitching to them, simply do not get this argument. Flat out, they feel low interest rates are a double positive affirmation of not only inflated prices - but of future price appreciation!

Comment by darthrealtor
2009-02-12 08:14:41

These knifecatchers have weak ARMs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Mikey(2)
2009-02-12 08:45:45

I countered this low-interest rate argument from a seller’s agent; told her that prices will go down when interest rates go up, and that they’ve nowhere to go but up. It was nice to see her struggle for an answer. And I must give her credit for coming up with a retort: that it’s better to pay more towards one’s principal than to pay towards interest. And who knows when interest rates will come down again?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Pinch-a-penny
2009-02-12 09:15:05

But you are not really paying on the house, you are merely paying down the debt, while the price of the house plumments, so it negates whatever principal reduction… When you go to sell the house, it will still be underwater, as the rate of principal reduction most likely will not keep pace with the rate of the asset decline.

 
Comment by Mikey(2)
2009-02-12 09:24:52

Oh, I see that; I was just giving the Realtor a little credit for having a comeback at all.

At this point, the fact is that prices are coming down (despite what the NAR says) even with low rates, so at the very least you gotta wait until there is a change in the upward direction either in price or interest rates.

 
 
Comment by Neil
2009-02-12 08:46:23

The best time to buy a house when interest rates are high-ish, no stimulus, and, of course, everyone is telling you not to do it! When you buy with interest rates at historic lows, stimulus out the whazoo, and everyone telling you this is the bottom… Well, you’ve got nowhere to go but down.

So true.

So what happens if DTI limits are lowered again and rates go up? I really doubt down payment requirements can be kept low past 2009 (maybe early 2010).

But people are starting to notice the emporer’s new outfit is lacking a few threads… The excitement and buzz is missing from most people regarding real estate. Every article I read has the number of first time buyers plummeting. Since it is those that rent who promote the market…

The ‘Property ladder’ has lost a few rungs.

Got Popcorn?
Neil

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-02-12 08:53:39

I’ve been noticing lately on some local RE blogs that today’s knifecatchers, and the bagholding shills and agents pitching to them, simply do not get this argument.

Is the less knowledgeable demographic of the Crib Chatter crew gettin’ all hot and bothered by the nominal declines to-date? People get battered by the incessant “it’s a great time to buy because …” talk, I guess.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by AnonyRuss
2009-02-12 09:02:56

“(as in, never owned a home before?)”

I believe that one attains property virgin status after three years of not owning a house (doing the deed).

 
Comment by gather no moss
2009-02-12 11:12:53

If you haven’t owned for three years, FHA considers you a first-timer: http://www.federalhousingtaxcredit.com/faq.php#2

The credit being cut in half means that my time line for purchasing something was just doubled. (So There!!!)

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-02-12 06:09:46

“You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.”

Dr Adrian Rogers (1931-2005)

Comment by skroodle
2009-02-12 07:18:27

Isn’t that the same thing Louis XIV said up until they chopped his head off?

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-02-12 07:30:30

Skroodle, would it be better if I just sent some of my money directly to you, and bypass that intermediary known as the govt?

Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-02-12 07:41:03

Waste of money. Pay what you will, common sense cannot be bought.
..and it was Louis XVI that was beheaded, not Louis XIV. He died of gangrene.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Boston Bruce
2009-02-12 09:07:32

Interesting that Louis XIV used to hunt birds. When the birds were all dead, he had servants dress up in bird costumes. Then he shot them.

 
Comment by Skip
2009-02-12 09:20:49

Its hard to find good help like that any more.

BTW: Louisiana was named after Louis XIV, so he had that going for him as well.

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-02-12 09:23:24

Then what?
I hope he cooked and ate them. Wasting food is shamful.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-12 18:30:11

‘Its hard to find good help like that any more.’

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

‘I hope he cooked and ate them. Wasting food is shamful.’

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Man, some quality posts today!

 
 
 
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2009-02-12 09:08:59

“Isn’t that the same thing Louis XIV said up until they chopped his head off?”

No, it was “l’état c’est moi”.

Comment by Northern Renter
2009-02-12 09:16:14

And I think it was George Bush who said “Aprés moi le déluge.”

NR

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Darrell in PHX
2009-02-12 08:15:42

So, the bank CEOs that received $50 million+ compensation in 2006. Were those that received without working? Or, when they saw their compensation fall 75% by 2008, were they working without compansation?

When the government refuses to enforce immigration laws, undercutting the wages of the working poor, are the poor now working without compensation? Or, if we were to enforce our immigrationlaws, would we then be forcing the business owneres who are forced to pay better wages to attract workers, now working without compensation.

The Rand-fans, and the untra-Liberals both like to paint the world as black and white. Sorry, but there is very little that is that simple in life.

Comment by Anonymous Coward
2009-02-12 08:47:03

Amen

 
Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-12 10:35:48

+1

“When the government refuses to enforce immigration laws, undercutting the wages of the working poor, are the poor now working without compensation? Or, if we were to enforce our immigrationlaws, would we then be forcing the business owneres who are forced to pay better wages to attract workers, now working without compensation.”

I see that the E-Verify requirement was dropped from the stimulus package by the Senate after it was passed by the House. WTF?! Will we get an explanation? Perhaps they think the general public would not notice? This illegal labor situation is out of control. I’m VERY angry about this. This basically means that illegal aliens will enjoy jobs financed by the stimulus funds.

 
Comment by Jon
2009-02-12 10:53:07

+1
Ideologues are ignorant by definition. The world always has another level of complexity than is readily apparent.

 
Comment by Northeastener
2009-02-12 10:54:50

When the government refuses to enforce immigration laws, undercutting the wages of the working poor, are the poor now working without compensation?

Saw something on Lou Dobbs last night about an attempt to expire the “E-Verify” program. I laughed. This program is as close as the government is likely to get to efficient electronic verification of employment eligiblity without a national ID card and some politician wants to get rid of it.

 
 
Comment by yogurt
2009-02-12 10:16:30

The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else,/i>

Sounds like this guy disapproves of the Emancipation Proclamation and 13th Amendment. After all, to give slaves their freedom, the government had to “take” them from their owners.

Comment by reuven
2009-02-12 10:56:06

Well, he was a Southern Baptist minister. The Southern Baptists came into being when they split from the Baptist church in the 1840s over slavery…

Comment by Skip
2009-02-12 12:32:48

Southern Baptist were for slavery in case anyone didn’t know.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Mole Man
2009-02-12 10:33:29

This is ideology without evidence. If private organizations could competitively build roads, water, sewer, and power systems that serve the public then they would. People investing in their common good is not division of wealth.

Comment by measton
2009-02-12 20:43:29

This is ideology without evidence. If private organizations could competitively build roads, water, sewer, and power systems that serve the public then they would. People investing in their common good is not division of wealth.

The problem isn’t that private organizations can’t competitively build roads, it’s that there would be no coordination, overbuilding in one area underbuilding in another. The roads wouldn’t be built to support the common good but to maximize profits. What if Wallmart controlled all the highways and set the tolls? Would that give them an advantage over say Target or Cosco?

The gov should control roads, water, sewer, power lines, gas lines cable lines, and operating systems. Then they should create an open biding system that prevents monopolization for their use. That is the best way to foster competition, lower prices, and increase services for customers. It would create opportunity for start up companies that wanted to generate electricity, provide TV programming, create software, ect ect.

 
 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 11:41:51

which poor are we talking about? the ones who are working, or the ones who are sitting on their ass? because the ones who are working are starting to feel like chumps.

trend from last 15 years: men filing for disability and NEVER returning to the workforce, even though they can work (either limited hours or certain kinds of jobs)

talked to some of them (who are actually disabled, not scamming–mobility limited due to heart conditions, and I know another guy on dialysis) and the whole system screws ‘em if they try to work a little… also, despite ADA, good luck getting a service industry employer to ‘accommodate’ a heart condition that leaves you winded after a few hours. they were discussing dealing with the SSD system and how to expedite that… they had worked hard before the disability, but had not taken care of their health and now it was gone… pushing men to work 80 hr weeks is leading to a lot of men who “can’t work” (well, they can, but only light duty, 20-30 hrs per week and they need expensive medical care on top of that)

kidney failure, heart failure, metabolic syndrome… list goes on and on (back injuries, too, in certain jobs)

sure, the individual was in part negligent, but without union protection, it’s hard to get work safety, appropriate bathroom breaks, OT/hours issues taken seriously. if you want a job, you take what they give you, but it kills you, and then you end up on the dole for the rest of your life. nasty.

(my buddy on dialysis used to work 6-7 hr shifts or longer without going to the bathroom. destroyed his kidneys)

way back when the working man just up and died, now he’s saved with high tech medical care but useless in the labor force. awesome.

seems like we can’t afford NOT to have strong unions and universal health care … especially if there are incentives for workers to keep themselves healthy. At my work they pay you to work out and keep your fitness level and blood test results good. They don’t want to have to shell out later to keep someone on dialysis or insulin.

 
Comment by hd74man
2009-02-12 14:24:02

RE: “You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom.

Welfare Reform Act of 1996 repealed in the Stimulus Bill in order to boost Oprah ratings by elevating the Neilson numbers of the single mother, stay at home, “smoke & dope” audience.

Comment by ecofeco
2009-02-12 17:29:29

2008 Federal budget shows $46.5 billion for Administration for Children and Families. (basic welfare)

How much “welfare” did we just spend on the “Master(bators) of the Universe”?

 
 
 
Comment by whino
2009-02-12 06:23:46

Its about time. Lots of these people needed to be thrown out on their azz.

Lenders drop mortgage brokers

http://money.cnn.com/2009/02/12/real_estate/lenders_drop_mortgage_brokers/index.htm?source=yahoo_quote

Comment by DinOR
2009-02-12 08:36:30

whino,

Thanks for sharing that. What Alan Rosenbaum gladly omits is that just a few years -earlier- the exact inverse was true! Wasn’t the world better off when MB’s only wrote about 20% of the loans vice 80%?

See ya’!

 
Comment by rms
2009-02-12 08:54:06

“He pointed out that no mortgage broker ever underwrites a loan, creates a loan program or approves an application. Lenders always have the final say.”

Who cares if I commit fraud — it’s still the lender’s fault!

Comment by DinOR
2009-02-12 09:17:46

rms,

Sadly the banks didn’t figure that out until -after- there was zero market for “broker originated” ( read fraudulent ) loans. Of all the industries that flourished during the boom, this one bugs me the most.

 
 
Comment by hd74man
2009-02-12 14:35:56

RE: Lenders drop mortgage brokers

It was this cabel of independant sleazebags, along with their black balling real estate sales jokers who were largely responsible for gutting the integrity and professionalism of the appraisal business.

The average IMB’s criteria for an 1004 FNMA quality appraisal assignment?

1. How cheap will you work?
2. How fast can you get it down?
3. Will you refrain from expressing any negative narrative commentary about the neighhorhood or improvements which would raise red flags with an underwriter?
4. Will you hit the number we tell you to?

Good riddence to bad rubbish.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-02-12 06:26:05

I nearly choked on my toast this morning when I read Judy Shelton’s opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal. Imagine! In this day and age someone suggests an honest money standard!!

“Now is the time to challenge the exclusive monopoly of Federal Reserve notes as currency. Buyers and sellers, by mutual consent, should have access to an alternate means for settling accounts; they should be able to do business using a monetary unit of account defined in terms of gold. The existence of parallel currencies operating side-by-side on an equal legal footing would make it clear whether people had more confidence in fiat money or money redeemable in gold. If the gold-based system is preferred, it means that people fully understand that the purpose of money is to facilitate commerce, not to camouflage fiscal mismanagement.”

Get used to this subject. You’ll hear more of it as the U.S. Congress and the Federal Reserve grind the fiat dollar to shreds.

Comment by Captain Credit Crunch
2009-02-12 09:31:18

And then the FBI will seize the parallel system:

http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2007/11/16/the-liberty-dollar-seizure/

Yes, the creator is a nut job, but why does that matter?

 
Comment by octal77
2009-02-12 09:56:28


…parallel currencies operating side-by-side
on an equal legal footing…

I remember as a kid in the 1950’s of seeing paper money
with different color emblems and the words “United
States Note” or “Silver certificate”.

Does anyone know what happened to that form of money?

Do we need to revive “Silver Certificate” or “Gold
Certificate” ?

Comment by tresho
2009-02-12 17:09:26

Along with declaring the private ownership of gold illegal, one of the New Deal’s first acts was voiding contracts written to be settled in gold. The Supreme Court later upheld this ex post facto voiding of private contracts. That law has since been modified, but there is no reason to assume the US gov’t wouldn’t do this again.

Comment by Chip
2009-02-12 19:34:18

“…there is no reason to assume the US gov’t wouldn’t do this again.”

I think there is every reason to believe the government *would* do it again.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-02-12 06:30:29

“Let’s not mince words…this looks an awful lot like the beginning of the second Great Depression,” says Nobel-prize winning economist Paul Krugman.

(Gulp!) Are liberal economists using the dreaded “D” word already? Besides, isn’t Congress saving the day with that big “stimulus” package? And isn’t there a big difference between recessions and depressions?

“The real difference is this: a recession is a pause in an otherwise healthy economy,” explains newsletter editor Bill Bonner. “A depression, on the other hand, is when the economy drops dead.”

Comment by combotechie
2009-02-12 06:37:52

As I have been saying, go to cash.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-02-12 07:38:18

The big D word will be trotted out ever more frequently to justify Stimulus IV, Stimulus V and so on. TARP was Stimulus II if I recall correctly, so this bill that The One is about to sign will be Stimulus III. But I think I’ve lost count.

Let’s see, the first stimulus checks that were mailed last summer constituted Stimulus I. Should TARP be considered Stimulus II, or was there something in between? Help me out here. :-)

Comment by combotechie
2009-02-12 07:41:46

The big D word will be trotted out ever more frequently because the Big D is what it is.

This isn’t a recession due to liquidity issues; this is a depression due to solvency issues.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Asparagus
2009-02-12 08:04:15

From Wikipedia for “Terrorism”:

“Terrorism is the systematic use of terror, especially as a means of coercion”

Over the last two weeks, the language used to describe the financial outlook has gotten dramatically worse. I really do feel like we’re trying to be scared into supporting a bailout.

Get homeland security on this stuff.

 
Comment by SFC
2009-02-12 08:23:18

“A crisis is a terrible thing to waste,” Patrick said in a phone interview yesterday, echoing a catchphrase that is getting widespread use among Obama officials and governors during the transition.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2009-02-12 09:03:30

“This isn’t a recession due to liquidity issues; this is a depression due to solvency issues.”

It’s a banana.

There is nothing the Fed can do to stop the collpase of the biggest credit expansion in history.

 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-02-12 09:08:56

Over the last two weeks, the language used to describe the financial outlook has gotten dramatically worse. I really do feel like we’re trying to be scared into supporting a bailout.

You may be right about that.

But, conversely, couldn’t this language have been used earlier and more frankly? Not to generate a bailout or tax cuts or other measures per se, but simply to give the citizenry some real information and fair warning instead of sugar pill after sugar pill?

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 11:44:40

actually it’s a panic (or crash); all subsequent vocabulary (”dip”, “trough”, “depression”, “downturn”, “recession”) has been euphemism

I do like the new terms “credit crunch” and “deflationary debt spiral” for their descriptive flair, however.

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 11:49:07

I meant death spiral… damn, super stressed out today.

I thought I had just lost a lot of data. Turns out my PRAM and NVRAM was just corrupted. Reset and good to go.

(this union business stuff has me wanting to curl up into a ball and whimper … and the real party hasn’t even really started yet … now I know why people say working for nonprofits is a thankless task … omigod the stupid … can’t … stand … it)

 
Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-12 14:12:51

This is the greatest transfer of wealth in history:

“Like feudal lord claiming the economic surplus for themselves while administering austerity for the population at large, the wealthiest 1% of the population has raised their appropriation of the nationwide returns to wealth – dividends, interest, rent and capital gains – from 37% of the total ten years ago to 57% five years ago and it seems nearly 70% today. This is the highest proportion since records have been kept. We are approaching Russian kleptocratic levels.”

“Bubble Economy 2.0″

Michael Hudson

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 16:31:27

thanks for the tip. I looked up his website.

 
 
Comment by laughing boy
2009-02-12 07:58:57

They’re going to have to start naming them like software releases. I think TARP was STIM 2.0, but it was a beta version.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Skip
2009-02-12 09:23:27

Yahoo is calling it the “Great” recession now.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by uptick
2009-02-12 10:50:54

Yahoo news:

WASHINGTON – U.S. retail sales jumped 1 percent in January, reversing a six-month declining trend and defying economists’ expectations by posting the biggest increase in 14 months.

But higher gasoline prices and sales, and buyers snapping up other items on post-holiday discounts appeared to aid last month’s results. Analysts cautioned that the relief is unlikely to last.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2009-02-12 11:41:29

I hate to rain on this current Depression parade, but I’ve lived through something that was as close to the Great Depression as us young ‘uns have ever seen.

I lived in Pittsburgh during the early 1980s. Back then, the unemployment rate was closing in on 20%.

And, yes, there were some pretty creative examples of social unrest. Like when Reagan came to town in late 1982. A bunch of unemployed folks threw tomatoes at his motorcade. And a riot almost broke out.

Then there were the unemployed people who had a habit of crashing services at churches attended by the wealthy. They were pretty good at pointing out Bible verses like the one about “what you do to the least of you, you also do unto me.” (That was Jesus speaking, in, IIRC, the book of Matthew.)

The church-crashers had a LOT of local support.

 
Comment by tresho
2009-02-12 13:03:50

The church-crashers had a LOT of local support. Nothing much came of that, eh?

 
Comment by oxide
2009-02-12 13:37:55

The Great Recession? Dammit! I thought that one up months ago and used it here! Oh well, great minds…

 
Comment by scdave
2009-02-12 13:38:52

You had to be a working Adult working for a living to really understand how difficult 1982 was…I “crushed” many, many people…

 
Comment by scdave
2009-02-12 15:37:15

I = It…

One to many “working”

Gees..

 
 
Comment by cactus
2009-02-12 11:22:47

TARP1 and TARP2 add up to 1.6T ? is that right ?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2009-02-12 16:03:26

No, I think TARP 1 was $350B (1/2 of the 700B) that went into the hole under Paulson. TARP 2 is the other $350B that Obama and Geithner put the half mil pay cap on.

Geithner has a new bailout, I don’t know if that’s the same TARP 2, or a new pot of print-money.

 
 
 
Comment by Michael Viking
2009-02-12 08:50:54

Combotechie…what do you consider cash? Money spread out in various credit unions and banks under the FDIC limit? I’m curious how you store your cash!

Comment by Captain Credit Crunch
2009-02-12 09:34:17

I’m sure very few of us have enough to need to spread it around. The FDIC limit is 250k now. I’ve been working, saving, and generally living like a graduate student for 3 years now and have saved far less than that limit, although still a very significant sum.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-12 16:33:37

the grad students I know are spending more than we are, although they are showing signs of starting to worry about that…

 
Comment by Chip
2009-02-12 19:40:42

Getting all college textbooks that don’t require color illustrations into Kindle format could help. Ditto the college libraries - put the indezes online. Propose that and see how these “we-bleed-for-you” colleges react.

 
 
Comment by combotechie
2009-02-12 18:20:38

“Combotechie…what do you consider cash.”

I consider cash as any financial instrument that I can readily turn into spendable money. This ranges from plain old dollars to savings bonds to funds in a money market account.

Some people may question using the money market, but last year the govmunt pursuaded me they weren’t about to let any of them “break the buck” and cause a financial freeze-up.

(I’ll probably get flamed for this statement, but what else is new?)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by combotechie
2009-02-12 18:42:14

Just for the record: By “any financial instrument” I mean one that maintains a stable value. Stocks, for example, are financial instruments but their value fluctuates.

 
Comment by Michael Viking
2009-02-12 23:54:19

Thanks for the reply! I’ve agreed with you on the cash front all along, but I must admit over the past month or so I’ve been a little worried about the dollar.

 
 
 
Comment by Mariner22
2009-02-12 09:08:54

What good is cash (at least US dollars) if the government prints it at will? Does anyone really think $800 billion in “stimulus” infused over 2 1/2 years is going to do squat, especially given the trillions in mortgage equity withdrawals in recent years? Don’t you think the next stimulus package when unemployment closes in on 10% this summer will be several trillion dollars. And then consider the ancillary spending - car company bailouts, foreclosure bailouts ($50 billion? Yeah right, that is going to do a lot), and the big one - bank bailouts.

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2009-02-12 07:01:09

It`s only a flesh wound.

Comment by lavi d
2009-02-12 11:26:17

It`s only a flesh wound.

Ha! Love it.

 
 
Comment by Muir
2009-02-12 07:04:04

International Monetary Fund chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn said the world’s advanced economies — the U.S., Western Europe and Japan — are “already in depression,” and that the IMF could slash its global growth forecasts further. The “worst cannot be ruled out,” he said.
WSJ

(baked in, as I said yesterday)

 
Comment by patient renter
2009-02-12 15:29:40

Are liberal economists using the dreaded “D” word already?

How better to employ some good ole’ fear tactics?

Comment by measton
2009-02-12 20:49:59

Yeah fear tactics, because we all know there is no chance of this thing turning into something much worse???

 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
2009-02-12 06:33:23

Gotta be quick…

I saw the Obama story about stim helping CAT… well, just drove by Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers on I-4 outside Orlando. Their entire field is full. AGAIN. You have to see it to believe it. Hundreds of cranes and bulldozers waiting to be auctioned.

And we want to borrow money to get CAT back on line?

Comment by palmetto
2009-02-12 06:48:03

Precisely. This is what bites my butt about the stooges in Congress. There ARE healthy businesses, and there ARE healthy banks. There WILL be enterprise and ingenuity. However, if Congress tries to keep these zombie businesses and financial institutions on life support, these healthy enterprises cannot come to the fore.

And that’s what this is all about right now, Washington is trying to beat these dead horses, because of all the lobbying and money and whatever. And all the crying into beer about the “death” of American businesses. This is so easily solved by rewarding the prudent, the innovative, the law abiding and the decent. It’s really a no-brainer.

Did anyone catch any of the Congressional hearings with the CEOs of financial institutions? Now THERE was a moment. The dripping condescension and smirking from the CEOs was not to be believed. The contempt for Congress was so thick you could cut it with a knife. The only one who really seemed to get it was that Hispanic lady, who asked a question and then said something like “Not that you’re going to answer me, anyway”. Wow, was she ever pissed.

Comment by palmetto
2009-02-12 06:56:53

And the real lowlight had to be Barney Frank saying “If you want to give any of that money back, we’ll take it.”

What a circus. It was like “Yeah, yeah, we have to attend this dog and pony show so Congress can look like they’re doing something.” I’m surprised everyone didn’t wink and roll their eyes and sigh. But, fair enough, if that’s the best Congress can do, maybe they should do it every couple of weeks, just to annoy the CEOs and make them realize that’s what they have to do for taking public money. Really, it would probably piss them off far more to have to constantly be dragged in front of Congress, these guys don’t like to be told what to do and when to do it.

Comment by Carlos Cisco
2009-02-12 07:46:19

Lot of politicians winking to each other here in Ohio. Seems like they’re about to start a Land Bank on steroids here; they’re calling it that to hide the real reason. Its going to consist of state, county and city pols who will pay off all delinquent taxes to the schools, cities, ect; they will then “aggressively pursue” the taxpayers for the money and confiscate the property if they dont pay, thereby avoiding/eliminating foreclosure; main reason, they admit, is to stop free fall in prices which would grossly affect their major RE tax revision due in 2012. So, from leading the country in foreclosures from about 2000 to 2007, look for a major decrease to help lead the Obamastimulus here in good old Cuyahoga county. That aught to keep the geezers from retiring for another 5 years.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Brian in Chicago
2009-02-12 08:04:42

Do a google search for “the man who owns flint” - it’s an interesting story about Flint MI and the treasurer (or some other office holder) who has similarly constructed a land bank and is trying to use it to improve the city. It’s too new to know whether it will be successful or not and has has some positive and negative results so far. Nonetheless, it is an interesting read.

 
Comment by CA renter
2009-02-13 05:14:40

Some of us actually heard him speak at a Community Reinvestment Task Force meeting in San Diego. It’s certainly not a bad idea for place like Flint, MI, but the CRA/council members here in SD wanted to use the same tactics here to prop up home prices!!! Seriously, there is NO lack of demand in San Diego, just homes that are priced waaay too high.

 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-02-12 08:42:13

CEOs were “sitting in alphabetical order at a long table” according to the WSJ…

I’m pretty sure they were originally supposed to be lined up according to height, little guys in front.. ties straight.. shirts tucked in… but that was later determined to be too demeaning.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by X-GSfixer
2009-02-12 09:59:20

The primary purpose of these hearings is for the soundbites/facetime on the evening news, and archival footage for the next campaign ads.

AKA as “Baffle them with bullsh#t”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by lavi d
2009-02-12 11:30:32

…maybe they should do it every couple of weeks, just to annoy the CEOs…

haha. Maybe they should make them submit to random drug tests.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by hd74man
2009-02-12 14:53:34

RE: What a circus. It was like “Yeah, yeah, we have to attend this dog and pony show so Congress can look like they’re doing something.”

Would you expect anything less for a collective group with a 9% public approval rating, the mention of which, has all but disappeared from the liberal press since the annoiting of the Messiah.

And if the greedhead bankers are smirking at these clowns just what the hell is the rest of the world thinking?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Kirisdad
2009-02-12 18:12:15

What loans would you like them to make? RE is dropping in 95% of the country, so the only sound loan to make is w/ 30% down and a 700+ FICO. I believe those loans are being made ( except south FL condo loans). Car loans? money down and good credit, that eliminates 90% of would-be buyers. Small business loan? in a great recession?? I think the CEO’s were smirking because they know it’s a ‘SHOW’, some of the clueless congresspersons, do not. The gweat Barney Fwank knew it.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-02-12 07:37:25

Palmetto:

Sure that’s easy for you to say. But the reality is we just dont have it anymore in America. I wish and pray to find someone smart to talk to about a job. You have the right answer but i cant find the right people.

——————————
This is so easily solved by rewarding the prudent, the innovative, the law abiding and the decent. It’s really a no-brainer.

 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-02-12 07:55:56

I heard radio soundbites. One was (I believe) Maxine Waters (D-Ca), can’t stand her, but she asks “why did you take fees for taking TARP$ ?” Good question.

 
 
Comment by packman
2009-02-12 07:13:10

Interesting.

I went short CAT some time ago, though covered since - wish I would have held on longer I would have made a lot more.

Conversely I’ve been long Ritchie Bros. (RBA). The company has done well, though their stock price has been down lately - may have to double down!

 
Comment by Muir
2009-02-12 07:14:17

Yeap.
They keep missing the obvious don’t they?

Comment by palmetto
2009-02-12 07:32:24

And, so do far too many of the American people. Theoretically, under our system of government, Congress represents the people and their power derives from the people. It is the job of Congress to see that folks like the creatures sitting in front of them don’t get out of hand, and follow the rule or intent of the law and deal fairly with their constituents. However, once Congress has been suborned, the show’s over and pretty much everyone knew it. Really, it was like Congress was going cap in hand to these guys and pleading with them not to f*ck too much with their constituents.

Muir, to me, it was an important moment. Congress effectively gave up its power during the Bush administration and has never regained it. As a body, it had turned on the people from which it derives its power. So it really has no power anymore and that much was obvious yesterday.

In a few short years, we will see a new form of government in this country. And I pray it will be a better form.

Comment by darthrealtor
2009-02-12 08:20:41

If you read Harper’s be sure to check out the editorial this month. It sums up the US unwashed masses to a T and makes you realize this country is just one heartbeat away from mass fascism.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2009-02-12 10:55:29

one heartbeat away from mass fascism ??

We are already there…Everything has either been Criminalized or is some kind of violation…A fix it ticket is now a $100. fine…

 
Comment by hd74man
2009-02-12 15:01:09

RE: one heartbeat away from mass fascism ??

I am seeing distinct socio-economic parallels with what occurred in Germany during and after WW I.

At the risk of again being labeled a “Nazi” I won’t expound on my premises.

However, those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it.

 
Comment by Chip
2009-02-12 19:48:02

Notice how many times people ask the rhetorical question, “Can you (legally) do that?” That, to me, is a sign of the existence of socialism and we happen to have the fascist variety. People should not have to ask this question. There should be so little in life that is illegal, that we know exactly what it is.

You cannot imagine the number of things I could do as a young adult in the 1950s that I cannot do today - and those things did not harm others or appropriate possession or use of their property.

We’re there, comrade. ID cards comin’. Registration for the draft comin.’

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-12 20:46:18

Registration for the draft is already here.

 
 
Comment by Jon
2009-02-12 11:06:24

Congressmen and women represent those who help them get elected, not “the people”. They are certainly not one and the same.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Mole Man
2009-02-12 10:43:19

Is government money going to Caterpillar? Their stock price didn’t jump or anything, and I can’t find the evidence. There were remarks about how demand for construction equipment could cause them to rehire, but even that was kind of weak. Please post a link if you have something solid about this, but as far as I can tell this is political wind with no actual money behind it.

Caterpillar is a lot like GM right now: a corporate husk with no soul or drive. Worker morale and product quality are both relatively low, and other companies offer increasingly competitive products with better quality and service. Even with government help they are likely to flush themselves away.

Comment by VaBeyatch in Virginia Beach
2009-02-12 13:04:39

There are some nice stories about lifetime Cat employees blowing their heads off in the parking lot as the company moved manufacturing operations overseas.

Comment by krazy bill
2009-02-12 15:21:36

I worked 32 years in factories; an hourly carbon blob. It always amazed and saddened me that so many men and women viewed their employer as father, mother and secret lover. Their sense of self-worth was defined by their job, and when that was gone they collapsed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2009-02-12 19:36:21

“…so many men and women viewed their employer as father, mother and secret lover. Their sense of self-worth was defined by their job, and when that was gone they collapsed.”

I always had the opposite problem. I viewed them as a nuisance, and couldn’t wait to sever the relationship. But I’m not your average “company guy”. Of course, I was never making seven figures, which is what it would take for my attitude to change.

 
 
 
Comment by Kirisdad
2009-02-12 18:23:38

Only 10% of the stimulus package is going to infrastructure. A far cry from what the democrats led us to believe.

Comment by Chip
2009-02-12 19:49:45

True. Good thing that none of us here on the HBB are shocked.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by cobaltblue
2009-02-12 06:36:32

Bubble Economy 2.0: Or, The Financial Recovery Plan from Hell

by Michael Hudson
Global Research, February 11, 2009

Martin Wolf started off his Financial Times column today (February 11) with the bold question: “Has Barack Obama’s presidency already failed?” The stock market had a similar opinion, plunging 382 points. Having promised “change,” Mr. Obama is giving us more Clinton-Bush via Robert Rubin’s protégé, Tim Geithner. Tuesday’s $2.5 trillion Financial Stabilization Plan to re-inflate the Bubble Economy is basically an extension of the Bush-Paulson giveaway – yet more Rubinomics for financial insiders in the emerging Wall Street trusts. The financial system is to be concentrated into a cartel of just a few giant conglomerates to act as the economy’s central planners and resource allocators. This makes banks the big winners in the game of “chicken” they’ve been playing with Washington, a shakedown holding the economy hostage. “Give us what we want or we’ll plunge the economy into financial crisis.” Washington has given them $9 trillion so far, with promises now of another $2 trillion– and still counting.

link:http://tinyurl.com/agwrgf

Comment by DinOR
2009-02-12 08:42:57

cobaltblue,

Right, and they’re holding your 401k hostage and your job hostage and…

 
Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-12 12:50:40

Is a revolution the only way to get beyond this rot?

Comment by The Middling Lebowski
2009-02-12 18:01:14

I watched Dr. Zhivago the other night, and seeing the beginnings of the Russian Revolution was pretty creepy. The way things are headed here, something similar (although probably less violent) doesn’t seem out of the question. Then again maybe our upper classes will succeed in redirecting the anger toward, say, China. Either way, I think Smirking Bankers are about to go extinct.

 
Comment by The Middling Lebowski
2009-02-12 18:04:59

Maybe. Either way, the Smirking Banker is going extinct.

Comment by The Middling Lebowski
2009-02-12 19:49:35

Oops. Damned disappearing posts.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by robin
2009-02-13 03:03:23

How many new DAM projects can we build with TARP II? Where’s the water??

 
 
Comment by Chip
2009-02-12 19:52:30

IT would be nice, but I think it more likely they will re-form, like the molten metal guy in Terminator, and return ever richer and ever more anxious to pick your pockets some more.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Ex-Arizonan
2009-02-12 06:40:27

Hey Slim - got any more details on this one? Story mentions Cardinal and Valencia but doesn’t say where exactly this happened. Sounds like the far SW side.
Scary…

A Tucson, Arizona homeowner alerted of an impending home invasion by his security cameras, armed himself and took matters into his hands when four armed suspects attempted to break into his home last week.

“The victim was able to get back inside his house, close his door, semi barricade it, reach for a weapon that was easily accessible,“ said Pima County Sheriff’s Deputy Earl Gieron.

The homeowner shot at the suspects.

The four men retreated and took off.

Saw the story here .

Comment by Namehasbeenchangedtoprotectdainnocent
2009-02-12 09:16:25

Coming to your neighborhood soon. Got guns? It’s just too bad he wasn’t a better shot. Adrenalin pumping and fear don’t make for straight shooting. A 12 gauge semi-auto loaded with 00 buck would have been a better choice for home defense. But hey, at least he had a firearm! Any proponents for gun control after seeing this video?

Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2009-02-12 18:17:54

“Any proponents for gun control after seeing this video?”

Any thoughts of being pro-gun control ended under Bush and the destruction of civil liberties known as “The Patriot Act.”

I do worry about being broken into and robbed or worse, but I think my four dogs are better protection than a gun. But I FEAR a government that strips away its citizens rights in the name of the “greater good.” An armed citizenry is our only defense against the current and future corrupt politicians owned by the corporations.

That said I don’t actually own any ammunition. Learning how to use, store, clean and care for a gun properly hasn’t been a priority lately. I’ll have to keep the dogs for now. But I’ll defend your right to own guns! :D

 
Comment by Chip
2009-02-12 20:09:08

Doesn’t matter if there was an agenda. As the economy deteriorates such attacks will become more common against homes that look like they contain worthwhile stuff. Imagine you are a gun-control loyalist. These guys are running in, cocked and locked, and you are dialling 911. The officer who arrives will be there to identify your body.

And if you have any friends who think that pepper spray will protect them, recommend you have them watch this and re-think it. The best a gun fraidy-cat can do might be to sacrifice their German Shepherd, that the bad guys will kill, in order to buy enough time to get out the back door and abandon your rightfully-owned property.

Notice, BTW, that one doesn’t need 5,000 rounds of ammunition to make home defense work. I think people are over-buying ammo and it’s running prices up for hobbyists like me. The unoriginal reason to have a handgun and a shotgun, IMO: the handgun is for when you left the shotgun too far away to reach it in time for the shot. I think generally a rifle is a bad idea for home defense because the ammo is too-high velocity and can go through walls and easily endanger non–combatants.

The only thing this homeowner did wrong, IMHO, might have been to chase them outside and fire at their windshield - they obviously were in full retreat mode at the time, outside the house and trying to get away. I suppose he can claim that they were going for additional weapons in the car. As a jurist, I’d accept that.

 
 
Comment by Skip
2009-02-12 09:26:28

Sounds like the guy was expecting someone…

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2009-02-12 11:51:29

Yeah, saw that one.

And, scary thing is, you can live a perfectly law-abiding life, with no connection to drugs or gangs, and these a–ho–s will still try to bust into your house.

I commend the homeowner for his aggressive defense of his property. Too bad he didn’t take out the four thugs.

Comment by VaBeyatch in Virginia Beach
2009-02-12 14:50:49

I bet there is more to the story.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2009-02-12 15:03:04

I think so too. This attack looked way too planned to be one of those random things.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2009-02-12 15:01:07

Why do you assume this guy had “no connection to drugs or gangs”???

Sure seems like he was awfully well-prepared, with a firearm ready and waiting within reach of the door and security cameras pointing to where someone would drive up.

Paranoid, or did he know these guys might come after his stash? Or did he screw someone else out of their stash?

Comment by CA renter
2009-02-13 05:25:48

It might have been a high-crime neighborhood. It’s not uncommon for people to have security cameras and guns in bad neighborhoods.

I commend him for a job well done. Too bad he didn’t manage to shoot them all.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by onosurf
2009-02-12 06:54:35

Adam Smith gets the last laugh
By P.J. O’Rourke
Published: February 10 2009 19:22 | Last updated: February 10 2009 19:22

The free market is dead. It was killed by the Bolshevik Revolution, fascist dirigisme, Keynesianism, the Great Depression, the second world war economic controls, the Labour party victory of 1945, Keynesianism again, the Arab oil embargo, Anthony Giddens’s “third way” and the current financial crisis. The free market has died at least 10 times in the past century. And whenever the market expires people want to know what Adam Smith would say. It is a moment of, “Hello, God, how’s my atheism going?”
Adam Smith would be laughing too hard to say anything. Smith spotted the precise cause of our economic calamity not just before it happened but 232 years before – probably a record for going short.
“A dwelling-house, as such, contributes nothing to the revenue of its inhabitant,” Smith said in The Wealth of Nations. “If it is lett [sic] to a tenant for rent, as the house itself can produce nothing, the tenant must always pay the rent out of some other revenue.” Therefore Smith concluded that, although a house can make money for its owner if it is rented, “the revenue of the whole body of the people can never be in the smallest degree increased by it”. [281]*
Smith was familiar with rampant speculation, or “overtrading” as he politely called it.
The Mississippi Scheme and the South Sea Bubble had both collapsed in 1720, three years before his birth. In 1772, while Smith was writing The Wealth of Nations, a bank run occurred in Scotland. Only three of Edinburgh’s 30 private banks survived. The reaction to the ensuing credit freeze from the Scottish overtraders sounds familiar, “The banks, they seem to have thought,” Smith said, “were in honour bound to supply the deficiency, and to provide them with all the capital which they wanted to trade with.” [308]
The phenomenon of speculative excess has less to do with free markets than with high profits. “When the profits of trade happen to be greater than ordinary,” Smith said, “overtrading becomes a general error.” [438] And rate of profit, Smith claimed, “is always highest in the countries that are going fastest to ruin”. [266]
The South Sea Bubble was the result of ruinous machinations by Britain’s lord treasurer, Robert Harley, Earl of Oxford, who was looking to fund the national debt. The Mississippi Scheme was started by the French regent Philippe duc d’Orléans when he gave control of the royal bank to the Scottish financier John Law, the Bernard Madoff of his day.
Law’s fellow Scots – who were more inclined to market freedoms than the English, let alone the French – had already heard Law’s plan for “establishing a bank … which he seems to have imagined might issue paper to the amount of the whole value of all the lands in the country”. The parliament of Scotland, Smith noted, “did not think proper to adopt it”. [317]
One simple idea allows an over-trading folly to turn into a speculative disaster – whether it involves ocean commerce, land in Louisiana, stocks, bonds, tulip bulbs or home mortgages. The idea is that unlimited prosperity can be created by the unlimited expansion of credit.
Such wild flights of borrowing can be effected only with what Smith called “the Daedalian wings of paper money”. [321] To produce enough of this paper requires either a government or something the size of a government, which modern merchant banks have become. As Smith pointed out: “The government of an exclusive company of merchants, is, perhaps, the worst of all governments.” [570]
The idea that The Wealth of Nations puts forth for creating prosperity is more complex. It involves all the baffling intricacies of human liberty. Smith proposed that everyone be free – free of bondage and of political, economic and regulatory oppression (Smith’s principle of “self-interest”), free in choice of employment (Smith’s principle of “division of labour”), and free to own and exchange the products of that labour (Smith’s principle of “free trade”). “Little else is requisite to carry a state to the highest degree of opulence,” Smith told a learned society in Edinburgh (with what degree of sarcasm we can imagine), “but peace, easy taxes and a tolerable administration of justice.”
How then would Adam Smith fix the present mess? Sorry, but it is fixed already. The answer to a decline in the value of speculative assets is to pay less for them. Job done.
We could pump the banks full of our national treasure. But Smith said: “To attempt to increase the wealth of any country, either by introducing or by detaining in it an unnecessary quantity of gold and silver, is as absurd as it would be to attempt to increase the good cheer of private families, by obliging them to keep an unnecessary number of kitchen utensils.” [440]
We could send in the experts to manage our bail-out. But Smith said: “I have never known much good done by those who affect to trade for the public good.” [456]
And we could nationalise our economies. But Smith said: “The state cannot be very great of which the sovereign has leisure to carry on the trade of a wine merchant or apothecary”. [818] Or chairman of General Motors.
* Bracketed numbers in the text refer to pages in ‘The Wealth of Nations’, Glasgow Edition of the Works of Adam Smith, Oxford University Press, 1976

 
Comment by DowninSanAntonio
2009-02-12 07:13:41

We are beginning to see some changes in the “Engineering Sector”. It seems like the State of Texas is starting to reassess the Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) process for procurring engineering services. This process has been the bulwork for protecting larger engineering firms from undercutting by smaller firms that could possibly do the work for less money.

It is too early to tell, but changes to a price driven economy in the engineering sector may cause some fundamental changes in the way that our infrastructure is managed in the future.

All part of the fallout from the burst of the housing bubble.

Comment by bluprint
2009-02-12 08:22:17

Can you direct me to some reading material on this matter? I would be interested to look into it further.

Comment by DowninSanAntonio
2009-02-12 12:34:39

Here is the proposed text. I think that it is a direct assault on the Quality Based Selection process. You can find the details on the Texas State Legislature web site by searching for HB 1105

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/billlookup/billnumber.aspx

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to procuring contracts for certain professional services by a governmental entity.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Section 2254.004, Government Code, is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 2254.004. CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OF ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, OR SURVEYOR. [(a)] In procuring architectural, engineering, or land surveying services, a governmental entity shall:
(1) base its choice on demonstrated competence, knowledge, and qualifications and on the reasonableness of the proposed fee for the services; and
(2) if other considerations are equal, give preference to a provider of those services whose principal place of business is in this state or who will manage the contract wholly from an office in this state.

There are other portions that are added, but the above should be descriptive enough.

The bottom line is that as all of our institutions react to the effects of our bursting housing bubble, we are likely to see more actions such as these that can fundamentally affect the way that we perform engineering services.

 
 
Comment by In Montana
2009-02-12 11:13:17

Well speaking as a proposal manager for a vendor, the Texas system is a friggin mess. Very hard for a small firm to do business with govt there.

 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2009-02-12 07:19:42

Soaring credit card fees hit most

By SUSAN SALISBURY

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Credit-card issuers are doubling interest rates, hiking minimum monthly payments and reducing credit limits even for those with good-as-gold credit. JP Morgan Chase especially has raised the ire of consumers by imposing a $10 monthly service fee. Late fees, minimum finance charges, late payment fees, over-the-credit-line fees: All are increasing. Adding insult to injury, angry card holders who cancel their cards may adversely impact their credit rating.

“In the past we would see these blanket changes, normally, just for folks that had poor credit,” said Liz Pulliam Weston, a personal finance columnist and author of Easy Money.

“Starting last year, credit card companies started making these blanket changes to people with good credit,” she said. “The idea was to see if people would accept it.”

In December, the Federal Reserve passed stricter rules on when and how credit card companies can change the terms of agreements with customers - but those rules don’t take effect until July 1, 2010.

Today, the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs is hearing testimony on credit card practices. Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., who chairs the committee, Wednesday introduced the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act, which would clamp down on “anytime, anywhere” interest rate hikes and limit fees and penalties.

However, Greg McBride, senior financial analyst for Bankrate.com in North Palm Beach, says that the card changes reflect a business cycle. “When the economy is bad, card issuers go on the defense and look to limit their exposure to losses as unemployment and defaults both climb.”

Adds Peter Garuccio, a spokesman for the American Bankers Association, “I have heard people say, ‘I have not done anything to change my risk profile. Why am I having my credit card limit reduced?’ It may not be anything you are doing or not doing. The reality is, we are in a recession. Issuers are reacting to the broader economic forces at work here and taking steps to minimize their risks.”

Comment by Al
2009-02-12 10:23:49

If the credit card company I deal with wants to reduce my limit they can go right ahead. They put it up where it is without asking me anyway. If they want to introduce a fee, I’m sooo gone.

 
 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 07:51:56

Britain is facing its worst financial crisis for more than a century, surpassing even the Great Depression of the 1930s, one of Gordon Brown’s most senior ministers and confidants has admitted.

In an extraordinary admission about the severity of the economic downturn, Ed Balls even predicted that its effects would still be felt 15 years from now. The Schools Secretary’s comments carry added weight because he is a former chief economic adviser to the Treasury and regarded as one of the Prime Ministers’s closest allies.

Mr Balls said yesterday: “The reality is that this is becoming the most serious global recession for, I’m sure, over 100 years, as it will turn out.”

He warned that events worldwide were moving at a “speed, pace and ferocity which none of us have seen before” and banks were losing cash on a “scale that nobody believed possible”.

The minister stunned his audience at a Labour conference in Yorkshire by forecasting that times could be tougher than in the depression of the 1930s, when male unemployment in some cities reached 70 per cent.

Comment by laughing boy
2009-02-12 08:02:39

Well, I guess it can be said, England’s got Balls.

 
Comment by crazy frog
2009-02-12 08:10:22

Remember the times when everyone in UK was boasting how London is displacing NYC as the financial capital of the world?
The higher they go, the harder they fall. Iceland, UK, Dubai, Spain… I would not be surprise to see Holland in their company as one of the most severe affected countries. Even so that nhz feels like he is watching the paint dry in anticipation of the crash.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 08:20:31

The UK produces absolutely nothing that the world wants. Maybe Weetabix and Marmite.

They put all their “money” on the credit expansion finance game.

Good luck, UK. You’re pretty much scr*wed!

Comment by crazy frog
2009-02-12 08:26:33

+1.
Iceland at least has fishing. What does UK have? “Sophisticated” Financial Industry – good luck with that?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by crazy frog
2009-02-12 08:29:38

Hey, let me correct myself.
SCOTCH. That is the only product that I can think of.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 08:39:50

That is from Scotland and the price is up 30% for the single malts!!!!!!!!! Friggin Chinese are buying it like they won’t make anymore.

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 08:51:48

Maybe the prices were absurdly inflated in NY but all prices are DOWN out here.

Maybe it’s different out there?

 
Comment by Neil
2009-02-12 08:54:35

Do not get me started here…

My dad goes on how you cannot suddenly increase the supply of Single Malt 18+ year old Scotch. Arguments about dumping less Scotch to the blenders fall on deaf ears… Or that there is a substitution effect. (At some point, its just booze. Good booze… but at what price?)

England still does a bunch of automotive engineering (oops… not exactly a thriving field…). I have learned they make quite a bit of the premium baby gear. Let’s put it this way, I like the fact that Avent’s bottles note they’re made in England (vs. China and who knows what is in the plastic… ).

But ‘the city’ is doomed. So is NYC. I didn’t realize just how much of the office space in Dubai was never occupied (For years)! Emirates is a well run airline… but that is going to be a tough industry. Bad time for a country to go long on hotels…

Got Popcorn?
Neil

 
Comment by crazy frog
2009-02-12 09:00:16

Hoz, last time I checked Scotland was still in UK. Now if we talk about England only, there is nothing I can think of that they make.

 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 09:08:40

Not if you ask a Scot! The UK is the barbaric country to the south. lol

 
Comment by Ex-Arizonan
2009-02-12 09:57:13

Judging by what I see every time I go through Heathrow the main export is Toblerone.

 
Comment by ella
2009-02-12 10:47:49

Wha’s like us!!!!

 
Comment by scdave
2009-02-12 11:20:45

Not if you ask a Scot ??

They HATE the Protestants to the South..

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2009-02-12 11:55:44

I’m of Scottish descent on both sides of the house (MacDonald on the maternal, Fulton on the paternal).

When I was growing up, I recall two things that really got Mom going about her Scottish heritage. Item #1 was when she bought tartan cloth, then sewed her own kilt. Item #2 was the prospect of Scottish independence from England.

 
Comment by In Montana
2009-02-12 13:35:08

If it’s not Scotttish, it’s crrrrraaaaaap!

 
Comment by scdave
2009-02-12 13:47:38

Scottish independence from England ??

Slim…I had that explained to me by a couple of Scott friends…I guess there is one providence or county ?? that is still under English rule and they won’t give it back to the scotts ?? Do I have it right ??

 
Comment by X-GSfixer
2009-02-12 15:16:04

“Emiraites is a well run airline…….”

Dare I suggest that the US would have well-run airlines if:
-They had the government support that Emirates has,
and
-A near bottomless checkbook.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2009-02-12 08:35:31

Mini Coopers. Of course, Mini is owned by BMW, but they are assembled in the UK.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2009-02-12 09:08:59

Hey, that “allsorts” licorice is the best.

Hmm…The Japs used to pay a lot for barrels of single malt.

An ancestor of mine embezzled 100,000 pounds sterling from the Bank of England. That’s why his sons moved to the states. He’s long been outdone.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ella
2009-02-12 10:45:19

“Weetabix and Marmite.”

Weetabix, ahhh. But please don’t forget chocolate, twiglets, appletize and gin. I could go longer without oil and gold on a desert island than these precious resources.

The problem with exporting marmite is that it takes about 3 years to stop hating it, and start lurving it for the unintitiated.

My Favourite marmite recipe (tastes a bit like twiglets)

Spread marmite on whole wheat toast. Sprinkle generaously with freshly ground black pepper. Broil under grill for a 30sec-1 minute. Do not let burn. Yum.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-12 20:40:42

Who owns the North Sea Oil rigs?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by fries with that?
2009-02-12 08:36:50

Speaking of Dubai, there’s an article in the NY Times about how foreigners are fleeing as jobs dry up. Some of the newly unemployed bought real estate, but jingle mail is not an option. Over there, it’s either pay up, sneak out, or hard time in debtors’ prison.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/12/world/middleeast/12dubai.html

 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-12 08:16:55

Today, in some American cities and among some demographic groups, unemployment already exceeds 50% - and actually it has for quite some time. (ex. amongst Black males in Milwaukee, WI)

Of course the BLS numbers are more palatable to mainstream Americans, so let’s just focus on those, shall we?

 
Comment by Skip
2009-02-12 10:38:21

Hard to believe things are worse now then in 1941.

 
 
Comment by crazy frog
2009-02-12 07:53:59

Rick Santelli this morning on CNBC:

“What’s new Rick?”

“The brand new credit card that the government is going to get, or as some people like to call it – the Stimulus Plan.”

LMAO.

 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 08:00:02

“…Luo Ping, a director-general at the China Banking Regulatory Commission, said after a speech in New York yesterday that China would continue to buy Treasuries in spite of its misgivings about US finances.

“Except for US Treasuries, what can you hold?” he asked. “Gold? You don’t hold Japanese government bonds or UK bonds. US Treasuries are the safe haven. For everyone, including China, it is the only option.”

Mr Luo, whose English tends towards the colloquial, added: “We hate you guys. Once you start issuing $1 trillion-$2 trillion [$1,000bn-$2,000bn] . . .we know the dollar is going to depreciate, so we hate you guys but there is nothing much we can do.”….

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a403d716-f8a6-11dd-aae8-000077b07658.html

I wish I could do a Puddy Tat “Bwahahahahhaha” but I always miss letters. The entire article is a good read.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 08:17:56

Went out yesterday. Beer prices slashed $1 to $4 at a popular Midtown Thai restaurant. All prices down at least $1 or $2. Further cuts coming.

Take those haircuts, boys and girls. Those margins are dead. The restaurant business in this town is in dire straits.

BWAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!

Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 08:30:37

Damn, that is almost as low as Wisconsin tavern prices. Probably Schaeffer Swill and not something good.

 
Comment by Victhebrickv
2009-02-12 08:51:03

My father in law was a general manager for a restaurant franchise group. Just got laid off yesterday. The restaurant industry is dead here in So Calif.

 
 
Comment by Kim
2009-02-12 09:57:59

“We hate you guys.”

Yeah, we hate you too. But seriously, thanks for all the lead-covered plastic crap and tainted pet food. Enjoy the worthless paper, Mr. Luo.

Comment by WT Economist
2009-02-12 10:13:13

Bankrupting your customers isn’t a good thing in the long run. It isnt’ the trade, it’s the debt. When the trade balances, they won’t need to purchase more Treasuries.

Comment by Kim
2009-02-12 10:28:49

+1

You’re absolutely right.

I had in mind the saying that when you owe the bank X, you have a problem but when you owe the bank x-to-the-nth-power, the bank has a problem. China, it seems, has a problem.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ella
2009-02-12 13:17:49

“We hate you guys.”

Am I the only one who found this kind of funny? Can you imagine if everyone talked like this at big commissions and trade conventions…hee.

High Commissioner A “Your monetary policy is totally, rad, but, like, your new legislation is totally bogus.”

High Commissioner B “What. Ever. Bite me. Our new legislation is sweet, dude. It rocks. Motion to carry*”

*Or whatever they say at these things.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2009-02-12 16:06:36

I guess they don’t want to be excellent to each other.

 
Comment by ella
2009-02-12 18:52:06

“I guess they don’t want to be excellent to each other.”

hee! :)

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Mikey(2)
2009-02-12 08:01:33

I need to vent to people who can understand my recent foray into knife-catching.

Short version of a long story: I received a great offer on my house (FSBO); and I had planned on selling and renting. I found out that rents for comparable homes exceeded my carrying costs for my current home. Meanwhile, my wife and I fell in love with a pricey big house. But I nixed it, not only because of its price but because of the economy and uncertainty in my business this year. With no place to rent reasonably, I also nixed the sale of our home, and here we are, (one step closer to divorce). I really loved the big house, but I gotta sleep at night. Feel very bad, but know I made the right decision. Thanks for listening.

Comment by ouro verde
2009-02-12 08:17:03

wow, mikey 2! She needs to read the business news before she gives you the heave ho! Tell her life is NOT kind to a single woman in the world and she needs to appreciate her special arrangement.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 09:26:44

Trading up in this environment is madness. She needs to get a clue, and you need to grow a pair!

Comment by Mikey(2)
2009-02-12 09:40:33

That’s what I needed to hear, FPcat. Much appreciated.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 09:52:38

Thanks but seriously, look at the sheer amount of carnage all around you.

How can anyone seriously be thinking of trading up at this point? Don’t you want to sleep in peace at night? Eat good food in an element of calm?

 
Comment by Mikey(2)
2009-02-12 10:09:32

No, I was serious. I tend to feel sorry for myself when what I really need is a kick in the a$$.

The sleeping was really the deciding factor; what hurts a little is the fact that I had a great buyer on the hook for a lot more than I’m sure I’ll get even if I listed it today. So the regret is the fear that the any trade up in the future might actually be a bigger dollar step up as there are so many smaller homes around here with more always coming to market, whereas the bigger homes are fewer and far between.

 
Comment by scdave
2009-02-12 11:27:28

Debt & Credit card therapy never saves a marriage…

 
Comment by Jon
2009-02-12 13:44:06

I’m sure you love your wife very much. I’m also sure there are a lot of women you could love very much.

 
 
 
Comment by lurker2
2009-02-12 09:31:20

I’m all for them staying together, but I call b.$. on the argument that women need a man because “life is NOT kind to single women” That is mental terrorism at its best. And yes, I’m sure you can come up with statistics, but statistics are available for all sides of all arguments. Be happy ladies. You don’t need a man to live a happy life if you want to be single.

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-12 13:40:33

“life is NOT kind to single women”

Well, how about ‘life is NOT kind to anyone’. ?
Because it isn’t.
That’s why you’ve got to find good, high-quality, resourceful, willful, smart pals and form a band, or a club, or a posse, or a marriage, or a coven, or a whatever. And they’re your peeps, and you are theirs. Sigh. Connections are important. I am becoming more aware of that lately, because–newsflash–things are absolutely getting tough out there. I just heard some sad news from a friend, and that’s becoming freakin’ common! I mean, I knew it was coming, and did the best I could to prepare, but still.

Oh, hey, you know what, that was the first time I ever used the word ‘peeps’. I normally refuse. But I’m fragile and mild today.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Kim
2009-02-12 14:58:37

“Oh, hey, you know what, that was the first time I ever used the word ‘peeps’.”

But… but… don’t you like Easter??? Just last night DH reminded me that peep season is coming. They’ll probably have them on the shelves the day after Valentine’s. Love those peeps!

:)

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2009-02-12 15:10:30

Don’t worry, Olygal—-if things get really rough, you can come up to Seattle and join my commune.

We have room for a few more only-occassionally-fragile-and-mild-but-normally-ridiculously-entertaining types.

:-)

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2009-02-12 20:02:00

“But… but… don’t you like Easter??? ”

Ever seen Peeps in a vacuum? :-)

I know, it sounds like torture, but still entertaining to watch.

My, what big Peeps you have! :-)

 
 
Comment by hip in zilker
2009-02-12 14:20:49

“Be happy ladies. You don’t need a man to live a happy life if you want to be single.”

Or as we used to say: A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by bobo4u
2009-02-12 15:03:51

Actually, it goes both ways. Men live much longer when they’re married*.

*Proof that misery is actually good for you.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ouro verde
2009-02-12 20:10:53

lurker, be you a female or be you male?
I have been single my whole life and I am a middle boomer. I love my wild single ways but once in awhile I would love to turn the helm over to another person.
Sometimes I pretend PB is my man and I eagerly read everything he reads and I laugh and feel just a bit better because he shares so much to us all.
men beware!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by SFC
2009-02-12 08:33:46

Mikey, rent Fireproof. Watch it with your wife. If she won’t watch it, watch it by yourself. Try it, don’t give up.

 
Comment by Blano
2009-02-12 08:48:20

Sorry to hear that mikey. If you’ve presented the facts and made the right decision and she still goes off and screws you both over, there isn’t much you can do. Been there. Hopefully she’ll see the light.

 
Comment by crazy frog
2009-02-12 08:52:41

Mikey, it is a lose-lose situation. If you don’t buy, she will be grumpy. If you buy and later you have financial troubles, than you will say (or at least you will think) “I told you so”, which will create tension and put you again one step closer to divorce. Don’t beet yourself up. At least you did what you thought was right. Hang in there. Look what Muir posted at the top of this tread about “watching paint dry”. The crash is coming. It is inevitable.

 
Comment by whino
2009-02-12 09:09:02

Not to be harsh on her but, she needs to wake-up to the fact that houses are a dime a dozen and a good man is hard to find. She will hopefully get over it as prices fall futher and you can say “wow, look at how much money we would have lost if we had bought that house” I hope you will be able to say these words sooner rather than later. Hang in there, things are bound to get better as time goes by!

Comment by X-GSfixer
2009-02-12 10:24:52

My opinion might be colored by the fact that I’ve been there, but……

If “her dream” is to own a big house, and you put the kibosh on it for ANY reason (valid or not), she will be embittered, because YOU didn’t love her enough to stick your neck out and make her “dream” come true.

Let me know when she starts blowing money on other frivolous stuff, to compensate for the fact that she will never attain her “dream”.

The other possible reaction will be that she will start associating you with ruining her “dream”, and will start doing things to trash the relationship/”punish” you.

If your really “lucky”, you will start seeing a combination of the two.

 
Comment by hip in zilker
2009-02-12 10:33:06

“…houses are a dime a dozen and a good man is hard to find…”

So true.

A big expensive house is a load to carry - you have to pay for it, furnish it, clean it, air condition it, provide security, etc.

But a good partner helps one bear ALL KINDS of loads that life piles on.

Even if she “fell in love with” the house, surely your wife wouldn’t really incline toward a divorce over it. (If so, it might be time for you to do a few more foot rubs, wash dishes, finally get around to hanging that birdhouse, and the like.)

Comment by hip in zilker
2009-02-12 14:01:10

Pick up your own socks. Wipe spills off the kitchen counter. And I don’t need to mention not leaving the toilet seat up at night, do I?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Molly
2009-02-12 09:23:22

“wow, mikey 2! She needs to read the business news before she gives you the heave ho!”

Yes. Not just because times are tough for single women (they are). Times are tough for single men paying alimony and child support, too. Divorce hurts all parties involved. Except the attorneys, of course.

Anyway, there’s another reason your wife should get educated with you about all the economic chaos. It will bring you closer together as you realize you have a common foe to fight.

Avoid a divorce with all your might.

Comment by CA renter
2009-02-13 05:33:31

Avoid a divorce with all your might.
——————–

Best advice ever!

Though there are certainly exceptions (adultery, addiction, abuse, etc.), divorce produces far more losers than winners.

Best of luck to you, Mikey! You did the right thing.

 
 
Comment by Al
2009-02-12 10:29:37

Have you told her that you just couldn’t buy the house because you love her too much to risk ruining your future together? Use crazy frog’s comments to beef it up.

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-12 10:48:39

‘Have you told her that you just couldn’t buy the house because you love her too much to risk ruining your future together?’

Wow. You got some skills.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2009-02-12 11:25:23

Oh master, let me sit at your feet and learn…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-12 15:20:43

LMAO! So slathering it on thick does work, huh Oly?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Dr. Strangelove
2009-02-12 13:03:02

“But I nixed it, not only because of its price but because of the economy and uncertainty in my business this year. With no place to rent reasonably, I also nixed the sale of our home, and here we are, (one step closer to divorce).”

If you house is less than rent, we assume you’ve been saving like crazy, right? Tell your wife to do her homework. If she refuses, give her a quarter and tell her to call “Suzanne” for support, but to call Suz early, before she takes her soma, xanax and shot of jack.

DOC

Comment by Jimbo
2009-02-12 16:25:12

My wife and I caught ourselves a “falling knife” back in September of 2007. It’s a long tale of woe, and one day I’ll lay it all out here when we reach the happy ending to it, which really is in sight. For the past 15 mos., all my wife has wanted is compensation, and all I’ve wanted is revenge. I got a little bit of what I wanted today– or at least so I hope.

I was off work today to get my eyes checked for the first time in three years, and to visit the dentist, whom I hadn’t seen in a year. The dentist treats many people I know and I have heard from them how much he regrets buying a big, old beach house in need of many expensive renovations. He used the same realtor to buy whom my wife and I used to sell and buy. Realtor still hasn’t sold dentist’s previous home. After figuring out the two weren’t on the best of terms, I told him I had tried to have the realtor’s license yanked for, among other things, offering money to a 14-year old boy to pose nude for him and telephoning elementary school boys in the middle of the night, offering them money to participate in a sexually oriented survey. Dentist was a little taken aback at the info, but I could see he was interested. Told him I had copies of Washington Post articles reporting our mutual friend’s shenanigans, and asked him if he wanted some. He said, “Sure,” so after doing a little Valentine’s Day shopping for the wife, I came home and put the copies in the mail to him.

Now, our realtor friend considers himself an artiste, and the local fishwrapper has been giving him the rock star treatment on-and-off over the past year. He’s one of the few realtors still selling properties in the Atlantic City area, and I’m determined to bring him down. Knowing that my dentist goes on about his real estate troubles with his patients, my thinking is that the dirt on the realtor just might come out during some of those chit-chats. It’s okay if it doesn’t, though, because I’m working on plans for the much anticipated “Spring Selling Season.” All of you doing Las Vegas, have fun!

Comment by Sagesse
2009-02-12 17:13:03

I enjoyed your tale.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jimbo
2009-02-12 17:58:01

I’m happy you did.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Chip
2009-02-12 20:23:36

Mikey - in your “carrying costs” are you including the opportunity cost of not investing your current equity in something? Let’s say you sell for $300K and walk away with $150K. That $150K can be earning you at least 3% per month - and it is free from the sinking value of your house
that would reduce it further.

 
 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 08:01:47

England to join countries devaluing currency

Bank of England in money supply vow

By Chris Giles in London

Published: February 12 2009 02:00 | Last updated: February 12 2009 02:00

The Bank of England became the latest leading central bank to pledge it will start to use its power to create money to buy assets in the economy because traditional monetary policy has run its course.

Presenting an extremely downbeat quarterly forecast, Mervyn King, the Bank governor, said the projections “imply that further easing on monetary policy may well be required”….

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/90f996a6-f8a6-11dd-aae8-000077b07658.html

Devaluation wars heating up.

Comment by Skip
2009-02-12 09:37:01

Wow, the UK might just be affordable for a vacation next year…

 
 
Comment by ouro verde
2009-02-12 08:06:36

The brand new Inflationary Depression.
Brought to you by years of stinky deals.

Comment by Muir
2009-02-12 08:43:16

I’m seriously thinking of going 40% gold this month. (from 10%)

Comment by crazy frog
2009-02-12 10:06:15

I was thinking about it too, but having in mind how ease is to corner the gold market, aren’t you supposed to wait for the old high resistant level of $1000 to be broken first before you do it?

Comment by rosie
2009-02-12 11:36:40

It broke $1185.00 cdn. Is that high enough. It sure is for me.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by llcarlos
2009-02-12 13:36:09

I almost bought some when it was 775 CDN or so back in July. I’m not too smart.

 
 
Comment by Muir
2009-02-12 11:49:45

crazy frog,
I have no idea.
At this point buying gold close to $1000 seems like buying a very expensive insurance mid crash, with the insurer adjusting the premium as the crash is occurring.
And combie may be correct.
I do not think one poster here nows for certain if deflation/hyperinflation will win.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by amoney
2009-02-12 15:45:45

As one of the resident gold bugs, I would suggest buying some silver, its relatively cheaper. As gold goes up, it will drag its little brother with it.

Also, Oil is around 35/barrel. I can easily picture a doubling or tripling of that price within 5-10 years. A doubling or tripling of gold will be a much harder task, but still doable IMO.

Lots of talk about gold market manipulation. While there is probably a fair amount, the PTB haven’t been able to keep the lid on it from under $300 to its current price, have they? They can’t control everything.

Or you can wallow completely in dollars and keep repeating to yourself and others that you’re the king like some people around here. I was never much for listening to broken records, especially when the music sucks.

Proud gold owner since May 2000.

 
 
 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 08:07:22

Heaven help America’s banking system

By John Gapper
“…His  plan has good points, if they can be implemented. Mr Paulson’s original plan to buy bad assets from banks was flawed by its reliance on the government being able to set a different price from the market for toxic securities. Mr Geithner has conceded that weakness and, instead, wants private investors with whom he hopes to co-invest to bid freely for the assets.

This is fine in theory, but he has to come up with an actual plan first, which was lacking on Tuesday. The market was right to worry because, despite the talk of an “aggregator bank” or a good bank/bad bank, nobody has yet devised a way to make such a scheme work.

If he could go away and think about it, I would not be so concerned. He hashed things up by over-promising and under-delivering, but his ideas are sound and he has at least (belatedly) lowered expectations. After more work with the Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, he might surprise on the upside.

Unfortunately, he lacks this luxury. Mr Paulson angered Congress by getting it to authorise funding and then doing something else with the money than he had originally talked about. Mr Geithner had to calm down the Senate banking committee by promising to discuss with each member his or her pet ideas.

Mr Geithner is a good conciliator. He comes across as a cool technocrat on camera but his years at the Fed have taught him how to stroke politicians. After two hours of him telling senators “that is an excellent question” and “I think that you have identified the problem exactly right”, they were mostly purring….”

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9bddecbc-f85a-11dd-aae8-000077b07658.html

Mr. Geithner has years of experience at the NY Fed where he learned the art of the lie. Perfect for this economy.

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2009-02-12 11:45:21

It is a $7 trillion+ problem. You have $350 billion left to fix it. NO MORE money can get approved.

Go.

Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 11:56:10

“It is a $7 trillion+ problem. You have $350 billion left to fix it.”

‘I can print as much money as I want and give it to whomever I choose for any reason whatsoever.’ A paraphrase from Bennie’s blog

actual quote: “The Use of Authorities Under Section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act Section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act authorizes the Federal Reserve Board to make secured loans to individuals, partnerships, or corporations in “unusual and exigent circumstances” and when the borrower is “unable to secure adequate credit accommodations from other banking institutions.” This authority, added to the Federal Reserve Act in 1932, was intended to give the Federal Reserve the flexibility to respond to emergency conditions. Prior to 2008, credit had not been extended under this authority since the 1930s. However, responding to the extraordinarily stressed conditions in financial markets, the Board has used this authority on a number of occasions over the past year.”

Stop worrying about lack of moneys, these are B52 bombers dropping the money from the sky in mass action bombing runs, not strategic strikes. Sit back and enjoy the popcorn, its a hell of a show.

 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 13:25:46

posts are not showing…alas.

 
 
Comment by mikey
2009-02-12 11:59:03

TMJ4 TV News and Milwaukee Journal got all over this. Associated Bank says it has cancelled the BAILOUT Money Party as of this noon.

Associated Bank plans its own fiesta after bailout party
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel JSOnline

Posted: Feb. 11, 2009

Associated Bank is moving from the welfare line to the conga line.

Just three months ago, the state’s second-largest bank joined scores of other troubled lenders when it cashed a check for $525 million from the federal government to prop up its bottom line.

Today, Associated is preparing to drop tens of thousands of dollars - and maybe more - to send about 100 employees to a posh Puerto Rican resort as a reward for a job well done.

The lucky staffers at the Green Bay-based bank are slated to leave Wednesday and fly to the El Conquistador Resort & Golden Door Spa in San Juan, Puerto Rico, returning Feb. 22.

The resort, with rooms that run up to $450 per night, touts its 100-acre private island; 18-hole golf course, complete with waterfall; private marina; Parisian day spa; children’s water park; and 10,000-square-foot Caribbean casino.

And there’s more.

“Members of the Star Performers will be treated to an adventuresome getaway that includes ATV adventures, tours of Old and New San Juan, coastal kayaking, golf and an awards ceremony in the El Yunque Rainforest,” said an internal Associated Bank memo. “Congratulations to all of our winners for their dedication to Achieving Excellence in sales and services

http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/noquarter/39476367.html

 
Comment by robin
2009-02-13 03:09:48

He disappointed us all greatly with his weak and unreasoned analysis, sad!

 
 
Comment by SFC
2009-02-12 08:07:52

I got into an argument with a guy from Sweden recently. He was saying how great it was to be a socialist. I found this:

“Swedes aged between 16 and 64 claimed they could not work due to ill health for an average of 39.9 days in 2006, according to figures from the Swedish Social Insurance Administration (Försäkringskassan), which controls state payments to the sick.”

AND:

Legally mandated vacation days
Sweden 32

As the USA becomes more like Sweden, how will we adjust to the average worker taking 8 weeks of sick leave and 6 weeks of vacation a year? Surely Americans aren’t going to continue to work as hard, only to support the welfare state.

Comment by crazy frog
2009-02-12 08:22:35

If you want an example of what USA will look like when the socialism has finally wins over here, take a look at Detroit. by means of the unions Detroit has been under socialism for years.

Comment by Muir
2009-02-12 08:52:27

I do not need to see what things will be like.
How about how things have looked like in the past 8 years?
If Socialism encourages laziness, then we have been in a Socialist system for years.
Many in the middle class buying two, three houses, with encouragement and 104% financing from the banks.
The “greed is good” got us here.
Horatio Alger story is a myth.

Comment by crazy frog
2009-02-12 09:17:35

I do not like one bit what has happened over the last 8 years, but this does not mean that I am eager for the socialism to come. Rather I am waiting for some sanity to prevail and people to realize that they have to work and to produce actual goods and services in order to prosper. They should not relay on ponzy investment schemes (aka. “greed is good”) or the government (aka. Socialisum) to make them prospers. For me it is as simple as that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by yogurt
2009-02-12 10:34:15

Rather I am waiting for some sanity to prevail and people to realize that they have to work and to produce actual goods and services in order to prosper.

That sounds a whole lot like Germany, which just about every American this side of Bernie Sanders would consider “Socialist”.

Germany had no housing bubble BTW.

 
Comment by crazy frog
2009-02-12 11:05:35

No, they don’t. And yes, it is a quasi-socialist country. But they have unemployment rate of more than 20% among young people in some parts of the country. And they have huge problems coming. Just ask someone from Germany that is on the other side (not the one benefiting) of the socialist redistribution, what has been happening with the world famos “German Work Ethics” recently. It is in the toilet.

 
Comment by yogurt
2009-02-12 12:47:48

At least Germany makes things that the rest of the world wants. When was the last time you even saw something made in the UK?

 
Comment by crazy frog
2009-02-12 13:26:19

I agree. Germany is what pulls EU ahead. We will see how long Germans will be willing to pay for everyone else in Europe.

By the way, what about this name yogurt? Aren’t you by any chance from Bulgaria?

 
Comment by yogurt
2009-02-12 13:32:01

Nope, I was just thinking about breakfast when I picked my handle. :-)

 
 
 
Comment by Skip
2009-02-12 10:44:23

In case you guys haven’t heard, union membership is at a all time low.

Even GM is hiring new union workers at $14/hour now with less benefits than older workers.

Companies are *taking* benefits away from employees, not giving them more sick leave( bye bye pensions and 401k match). Health care will be the next benefit that will be just too expensive to offer.

Anyone that complains is replaced by another worker desperate for a any job or most likely, outsource to another country. There is competition for minimum wage jobs now.

Comment by measton
2009-02-12 13:46:22

This has been the whole goal of globalization. US workers will soon work for a bowl of rice, and a mud hut just like in China.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2009-02-13 05:41:30

Exactly, measton.

And the financial overlords will rule the earth. :(

 
 
Comment by Chip
2009-02-12 20:39:46

“…union membership is at a all time low.”

Betcha the stimulus bill is designed to reverse that. First stop? auto plants in the South and Wal-Mart everywhere. The Kalashnikov? Abolition, via language in the Stimulus, of secret voting for labor unions. Union thugs know they easily can intimidate 51% of workers to sign up, just as many of us have seen 51% of neighbors sign agreement for an ugly-roof variance or similar, when it was brought to our front door by a very aggressive homeowner.

And NO ONE will give a logical explanation of why secret ballots are anything less than the best way to conduct virtually any election.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-02-12 08:34:43

That guy might be a socialist but Sweden is a constitutional monarchy. Americans are themselves, or are descendants of, former occupants of such places, but were lucky enough, smart enough, and had the balls to escape..

We won’t go back to that voluntarily, imo. But if we do, woe is us.

 
Comment by Mole Man
2009-02-12 10:54:13

This isn’t a balanced review. It is extremely rare for a Swede to go bankrupt because of a health problem, but in the US this is common and increasing. Regarding leave and sick days, both Sweden and Norway have significant problems caused by cold and dark winters which is a big part of that.

Calling the US a welfare state ignores the fact that productivity and time spent at work are higher in the US than anywhere else.

Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2009-02-12 12:16:38

“It is extremely rare for a Swede to go bankrupt because of a health problem”

Right. It’s more common for them to DIE from the health problem.

Comment by janna
2009-02-12 12:25:07

Really? They have longer life spans in Sweden than we do in the US. Probably due to all that substandard health care.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by potential buyer
2009-02-12 16:16:40

I’ve always heard that The Netherlands are rated as the best countries in the world to live, that their stress level is way lower than in other countries. (Ignoring weather). I’d say if you were taken care of financially and healthwise, that would go a long way to making you happy.
I’m OK with a little socialism.

 
 
Comment by Jon
2009-02-12 14:06:51

Doesn’t everyone die from a health problem?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by parrish dave
2009-02-12 15:17:18

Or
murder
suicide
accident..

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 08:42:05

Independence Federal Plans Merger With ColomboBank

By Anita Huslin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 12, 2009; Page D01

Independence Federal Savings Bank yesterday announced plans to merge with ColomboBank of Rockville, a deal that would create a $300 million thrift controlled by Washington businessman Morton A. Bender.

Bender, who has been majority shareholder in both banks since he took over the historically black Independence two years ago, had proposed the merger several years ago. He was blocked in 2004 by the Office of Thrift Supervision because of questions about Colombo’s weak money-laundering controls and failure to comply with consumer protection regulations….”

WaPo

A lot of history in this merger.

 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 08:54:27

hllwnz wanted to look at investing in the US stock market and I was trying to think what could get me to invest as a ‘long term investor’ in this market.

These are things I would look for:
I would not invest in any company that had large layoffs. Layoffs mean the company management does not know what it is doing. They could not manage the company well during the upturn, they certainly cannot manage during a downturn.

I would look for companies that are hiring. About 52% of all US companies are planning on hiring.

I would look for a low debt structure that did not roll over for a few more years.

And finally before I bought a single share, I would wait until the stock price was 5% over the 200 day simple moving average.

Comment by scdave
2009-02-12 11:34:12

Nice post hoz…Makes sense to me…

 
 
Comment by Anonymous Coward
2009-02-12 09:08:38

Chicken housing bubble

link

A chicken housing crisis has cropped up in the U.S., and it’s producing some of the same bleak results as the human one — foreclosures, lawsuits and devastated homeowners.

Today’s chicken houses are bigger and more sophisticated than the coops of yore. Made from corrugated metal and wooden beams, the cavernous shacks can be longer than a football field and cost more than $200,000. To maximize profits, many farmers own at least four, meaning high-six-figure mortgages are common.

A typical farmer with four large chicken houses can gross between $125,000 and $150,000 a year. Expenses often amount to more than 30% of their income.

Do the math.

 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-12 09:09:55

Talk me down. Things have changed dramatically compared to last year when I last surveyed the local housing market.

Last night, I saw a 1994 2300 sqft ranch on 1.2 acres for 239K, one lot away from the St. Johns river near World Golf Village (WGV). It’s too high, I know. Last sold for 189K in July, 03. Fictitious value at the peak was 360K according to Z. If these puppies start dropping to 1999 values (152K according to Z), it is going to be extremely difficult to not buy.

That said, some of the neighborhoods immediately around WGV are diving. I saw several ~2000 sqft homes going for 140K. Fictitious peak values were near 300K. Condos at Palencia, another uppity project targeted at out-of-towners, are under 100K.

Comment by Blue Skye
2009-02-12 09:19:07

Easy: Add the current rate of decline to your “howmuchamonth” number. Willing to pay a few thou a month above the PITI for that gem?

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 09:28:33

These puppies are going to drop to 1983 prices (adjusted for wage inflation.)

Don’t be a knife-catcher! You’re talking about Florida, the clown-prince of Bubbletopia™!

Comment by exeter
2009-02-12 09:39:46

I agree with mrktMvn….. until I completely disregard the bubble year prices and actually think about “$152K’.

Just because I can write a check for doesn’t mean it’s priced correctly.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 14:57:27

This is a GENERAL point.

Just because you can write a check for some amount doesn’t mean the pricing is rational; it just means that you are a saver with dough instead of credit.

You can’t just willfully disregard the data points. The key thing that matters is OTHER people’s paying power not your own.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by crazy frog
2009-02-12 15:54:45

This is my plan FPSS. When I buy I will be asking myself, how much can I get for this house if I have to sell it a year later. I have no intention to pay a dollar more just because I can. I worked hard for my money and I am not giving it away ease. Now if I am a specuvator with 100% LTV financing, than I would not care so much – ease come ease go.

 
 
 
Comment by packman
2009-02-12 10:10:10

IMO adjusted for wage inflation we’re probably going to go way below 1983 prices - especially in Florida where there is massive overbuild. We’re practically talking 1926 going on down there right now. We might end up seeing 1983 nominal prices.

mrkMaven - in a word - don’t.

Wait 2 more years.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 12:05:43

Yeah, agree. I meant to say “at least” 1983-prices.

Florida is “special”, really “special”. They rode the short bus real hard.

Just a quick recap: Florida prices did not hit the 1926-peak in nominal terms till 1986.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-12 12:55:18

Wow! That would be horrible for most of the younger families around here. It’s hard to tell what 1983 prices would be in some areas of town. Most of it did not even exist b/4 the HB.

WGV was pasture land before the HB. Some of my friends tell me most of the people on the west side of town lived in trailers before the big builders moved here.

 
Comment by packman
2009-02-12 13:20:00

I lived in Boca Raton and Boynton Beach in the early 90’s - I know what you mean. I used to take my CJ7 4-wheeling through the back woods behind Boca - now it’s all built out completely out to Loxahatchee with gated communities. Boca actually *is* out of land, which is part of the reason why prices were so high there - the name, with no new Boca addresses. Boynton also was all orchards and trailer parks out west before the mid-90’s - I bought a house that was built on an orchard actually.

I’ve since learned to really appreciate the older Florida, and really hate seeing all the development.

Ever see the movie The Yearling? That’s *really* old Florida.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2009-02-12 15:34:50

“Just a quick recap: Florida prices did not hit the 1926-peak in nominal terms till 1986.”

Holy cr*p, Batman! I knew the 20s were an off the charts mania, but I didn’t realize they were THAT bad!

 
 
 
 
Comment by Mikey(2)
2009-02-12 09:57:45

At a certain point you have to start weighing your emotional desire for the house and the uniqueness of the house, against the possibility that it will be worth less in the long run. At a $152K, how much more can it go down such that it would make a difference in your life? What’s it worth to you to not have to wait for it to come down lower?

That said, if things go down so low, what effect will it ultimately have on the neighborhood and will you really want to live there?

Beware the knives; they’re sharp on both sides.

Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-12 10:50:18

I forgot to mention there is no HOA and no CDD junk fees, simply county taxes. It’s wooded in the front (there is a lot of oak in that area) and the entire lot is fenced. The home sits to the back of the lot.

This is probably not THE ONE. However, it has many of the attributes I’m looking for in a home. It helps to get that out of the way.

Comment by ride the river
2009-02-12 11:17:09

I’m in the same state of mind. Would like to move to Fla this fall and would like to buy, but I don’t think prices will have finished dropping by then. I’ll probably rent somewhere from Pinellas county on south on the Gulf side.

I have be reading you folks for a while but decided today to send Ben a contribution and start posting.

I’ll be looking for guidance on the Fla threads from the regulars there for how thing are going. I can’t go to the Las Vegas meet-up, but hope to make the next one.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Jon
2009-02-12 14:17:23

Ask to rent for a guaranteed one year contract. Then buy it from the bank for $80K after they foreclose.

Better yet, leave the Orlando area. Along with greater Miami, it is the worst place to live in Florida. I’ve lived in both.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2009-02-12 10:17:30

At some point houses will be fairly priced by normal metrics, and homeownership will once again be a decent deal for those who can reasonably expect to live in a place they like permanently.

The question is, does it make sense to go on renting while waiting for an overshoot on the downside? Hyper-inflation might make reasonably priced homeownership a good deal; the Great Depression II might make it a disaster.

 
 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 09:12:10

On his blog, Brad DeLong has a series of short, insightful notes on the new financial rescue plan. “1. Called the Geithner Plan, not the Obama Plan–distancing of the president from the proposal. 2. Reinforced by Axelrod leaks to Labaton and Andrews painting Geithner as the Wall Street loving holdover–and this the person to take the blame if things go south. 3. This is not new money–this is only the second half of the TARP from last fall: $350B. 4. It is an attempt to leverage the TARP money–via the Fed and the private sector–as much as possible. 5. As the Fed takes on tail risk and buys up risky assets, the supply of assets the private sector must hold declines and their prices will rise. 6.As public and private money flows into the banks, their risk tolerance will grow and they will bid up risky asset prices as well. 7. The net effect might be that fears that banks are insolvent or will become illiquid will ebb. 8. And the financial crisis and the Bush depression will come to an end. 9. But Geithner said this is not the end–that if the TARP money is expended and if banks still fail their stress tests, then what… 10. This plan does not foreclose a resort to the Swedish model, it is instead an attempt to use the TARP money to escape the necessity for adopting the Swedish model.”

WSJ

More on the Geithner plan here.
http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/tg21.htm

 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 09:21:17

Is Germany going to join the PIGs?

February 12 2009
A German sovereign bond auction failed yesterday amid growing danger signs for governments as they attempt to raise record amounts of debt to pay for fiscal stimulus packages and bank bail-outs, writes David Oakley .

It was the second successive failure this year of a 10-year Bund auction - usually one of the most sought-after - as demand fell 20 per cent short of the €6bn (£5.4bn)the German government wanted.

Gary Jenkins, head of fixed income at Evolution, said: “The failure of a German bond auction is a sign of the difficulties governments are going to face in raising debt at these historically low yields.”…
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8121d176-f8a6-11dd-aae8-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1

Comment by Observer
2009-02-12 14:11:20

What does this portend for U.S. auctions to fund this current stimulus, the ones that are sure to follow, and all the actions of the Fed.

 
 
Comment by whino
2009-02-12 09:37:15

Just Imagine Pandit Questioning Barney Frank: Caroline Baum

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&refer=home&sid=a5UrNNsvQepQ

 
Comment by exeter
2009-02-12 09:45:34

In many areas in the northeast, I’ve observed an new trend in some of the REO listings of various websites (fannie, freddie, emailforclosure). What is it? $40,000 houses in areas where the cheapest shacks were $120k minumum. Not exactly stuff I’d be inclined to throw money at but a dose of reality nonetheless. These were non-existent just a few months ago and a flippers dreamdate during the bubble years. And the fact that these houses are still sitting after 2-3 weeks on the web tells me that either mortgage availability is non-existent or the speculative element has dried up.

 
Comment by reuven
2009-02-12 10:13:00

Vanity Fair had an interesting article on Wall Street bonuses

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/03/wall-street-bonuses200903

There was a chart with the article (unfortunately, not in the on-line edition) showing how the bonuses paid out exceeded or equaled the amount of bailout money received for about a dozen different firms!

My thinking, of course, is that they shouldn’t have gotten the money in the first place, and that would mean the Government wouldn’t have to have an opinion on what people should be paid…. But it’s too late for that logic.

(Also read the article on the making of the original Godfather movie!)

 
Comment by dude
2009-02-12 10:36:34

http://us.rd.yahoo.com/finance/external/tsmfe/SIG=135vp5rhe/*http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/story/10463635/1/geithner-bailout-plan-may-speed-bank-failures.html?cm_ven=YAHOO&cm_cat=FREE&cm_ite=NA

Geithner Bailout May Speed Bank Failures

I’ve been thinking about this stress testing a bit. I think we all acknowledge that GS has “most favored bank” status in Washington, and it would seem JPM isn’t far behind. Of the other really big domestic banks which one do you think will be left out in the cold this year.

My pick is WFC, they may have been the most responsible of the big boys which in my mind means they have the most flesh to be picked from the carcass. Additonally, you can’t get much farther from Washington than Frisco. I think WFC common goes to zero this year.

Comment by measton
2009-02-12 13:53:48

I hope not they control my retirement account. Since all the options at this point are crap I have a majority in their non fdic insured money market. What about BOA, or a trial run at some smaller banks first.

Comment by dude
2009-02-12 16:46:31

Smaller banks are already being thrown under the bus.

BofA is in the in crowd. I agree that it should be Citi or BofA but my money is on Wells Fargo.

 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2009-02-12 10:48:36

Our economy is bad, but it could be worse.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/12/world/middleeast/12dubai.html?em

“With Dubai’s economy in free fall, newspapers have reported that more than 3,000 cars sit abandoned in the parking lot at the Dubai Airport, left by fleeing, debt-ridden foreigners (who could in fact be imprisoned if they failed to pay their bills). Some are said to have maxed-out credit cards inside and notes of apology taped to the windshield.”

“No one knows how bad things have become, though it is clear that tens of thousands have left, real estate prices have crashed and scores of Dubai’s major construction projects have been suspended or canceled. But with the government unwilling to provide data, rumors are bound to flourish, damaging confidence and further undermining the economy.”

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-12 14:02:02

Nice article. Thanks for the link.

(my favorite bits)
‘Some things are clear: real estate prices, which rose dramatically during Dubai’s six-year boom, have dropped 30 percent or more over the past two or three months in some parts of the city….But Dubai, unlike Abu Dhabi or nearby Qatar and Saudi Arabia, does not have its own oil, and had built its reputation on real estate, finance and tourism…’

Well, this is gonna end greattttt.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 14:48:46

Dubai has absolutely nothing to offer to the world.

They are a pure bubble creation, and they are going to get destroyed.

That seven-star hotel Al Burj is both the Rockefeller Center and the Pebble Beach of this current cycle - the whitest of white elephants.

Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-12 15:29:47

How ’bout that decoupling? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by X-GSfixer
2009-02-12 15:39:53

“…..seven star hotel……”

“Mine goes to eleven……”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by cereal
2009-02-12 14:57:35

They really had some over-the-top plans for that city. I suppose you can google it, but one of their ventures was to be an enormous indoor SKI resort with multiple lifts. Contrast this with the 100+ heat just on the other side of those triple-glazed windows.

I suppose they’ll finish up that 300 story burp tower eventually. It’ll go down in history along with that 105 story thing in North Korea as the world’s most useless buildings.

 
 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-12 11:00:43

‘57 Horizon Pointe lots listed in foreclosure
Total amount owed is more than $5 million; auction set’

http://tinyurl.com/bv236v

More than 50 single-family lots at Horizon Pointe, a large Lacey subdivision, are in foreclosure, according to Thurston County Auditor’s Office data.

The slower housing market has been tough on builders, Building Industry Association of Washington spokeswoman Erin Shannon said Wednesday.
Not only have sales slowed, but stricter lending standards have made it difficult for builders to get financing for new construction or even lines of credit, she said.

Some builders have ceased work on their projects. D.R. Horton of Texas sold a large undeveloped subdivision off Mud Bay Road in Olympia last year for $7.1 million.

—————————————————-

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! HAHAHAHAHAHAH! *gasp gasp wheeze * HAHAHAHAHAHAH….
Oh, I could go on ‘Hahahaing’ ALL day LONG! I mean, there’s just so much schadenfreude and too much stuff to relate involving that wretched project. Where to start? First of all, the heinous transgression of the ‘Pointe’ with an ‘e’. Then the illegal cutting down of trees in buffers, the land grab, the pandering on the part of the city of Lacey, the lawsuits over having to comply with regulations, on and on…
Gosh, what a glorious wonderful headline.

Oh, and that 7.1 million sale of the Mud Bay acres? I am soooooo eagerly awaiting further exciting news on that little project…

Comment by lavi d
2009-02-12 14:00:40

‘57 Horizon Pointe…

I saw this and thought I was going to be reading about a 1957 Pontiac of some sort.

Sorry to hear about the trees.

It’s also sad to note that this “correction” has come about 20 years too late for several thousand acres of pristine Sonoran Desert (Tucson).

Feh.

 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-02-12 11:09:23

“But she disappeared weeks ago! Have you checked all the broom closets? No? Then do it. Hillary may have locked herself in while putting hers away.”

 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 11:18:47

“Gross sold government debt, sending the fund’s holdings to minus two percent, after adding to his holdings in December for the first time in a year. The fund held negative positions in Treasuries and debt issued by government-backed agencies such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Bank system.”
Bloomberg

Mr. Gross talks his book? No. Mr. Gross invests on reality that is why he is the most successful bond investor of all time. Mr. Gross opines what should be done and when the government does not act in the rational manner opined, he invests against the government.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2009-02-12 16:16:46

“after adding to his holdings in December for the first time in a year.”

Wait, doesn’t that mean he was buying Treasuries at the height of the Treasuries-bubble?

Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 21:46:06

Yep and reversed and went short “minus two percent”. A huge swing that saved his firm billions of dollars.

 
 
 
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2009-02-12 11:38:07

1000000000000 Lb gorilla in the room.

2 years ago I begged and pleaded with my wife to sell our house. She did finally let me list, but she got mad when I argued with the Realtor on price (I wanted it lower) and when I wanted to lower the price. When it was clear she was not going to be rational, we took it off the market.

All the while I was trying to get her to sell and rent for a few years, her mom was saying how wrong I was.

Guess what.

Last night mom says that they are going to sell and rent for awhile.

All I say is “too late”.

So, my wife gets angry that I’m being so smug.

She gets MAD at me for NOT saying “told you so”, because she knows I’m thinking it.

ARGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-02-12 14:20:46

Reminds me of that line from “True Lies.”

“Women. You can’t live with ‘em, you can’t kill ‘em.”

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2009-02-12 14:22:41

Marriage is the oldest “bubble market” in town. I rent. No lease. No HOA. Pay as you go on the utilities.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-12 14:25:05

‘She gets MAD at me for NOT saying “told you so”, because she knows I’m thinking it.’

You will never get any kudos for exhibiting restraint in these matters. They KNOW you’re laughing inside. So you should just go for what feels best in the first place, which is to jump right up off the couch and do your ‘Hahaha, I Told You So’ dance, with little frisky kicks and wiggles and holding your hands out like kangaroo paws and putting on exaggerated tragi-comic facial expressions, and blinking your eyes rapidly and daintily while you laugh and recite past stupid things they said.*

Jeeze, man! As a faithful HBBer I should think by now you’d know what to do!

*But, as a reminder from an experienced ‘Hahahah’ dancer, before you begin, you should make sure there’s no obstacles in the escape path route and that you can easily kick off your high-heels if a quick sprint is needed.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 15:44:35

I’m totally with you about jumping up and down, and shouting “In your face!!!” preferably with extraordinarily annoying noises.

What that sets is a precedent, and as any good behavioral economist or psychologist will tell you, that’s the anchor by which all actions are judged. Once you have pretty much lowered the bar that low, it’s all upwards and onwards from there.

Laugh hard, laugh plenty, snickerin’ and scornin’ all the freakin’ way with finger waggin’ and wigglin’.

Oh, and for the men, grow a pair of round ones.

 
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2009-02-12 18:49:26

I would just send her this (or learn it):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQS1m65WUCI

:D

 
 
Comment by Jon
2009-02-12 14:31:01

I am in same position. I desperately wanted to sell the house in 2005 and rent for awhile. Unfortunately, our house is my wife’s “dream house”. Fought about it on a number of occasions, and gave in to her.

Went over to a friend’s new house warming party in a new (and no longer developing) neighborhood. Wife says she loves the house and why don’t we sell ours & build here.

After visualizing punching her in the throat, I just grabbed a glass of Scotch and went out back.

aaaargh indeed.

Comment by parrish dave
2009-02-12 15:28:18

Geez, guess I’m lucky. I did such a good job converting my wife it’s going to be very difficult to get her to agree to buy in a couple years……

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 15:39:32

You guys really need to grow a pair of danglers.

Jeebus, what’s wrong with y’all?

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2009-02-12 16:13:27

“Jeebus, what’s wrong with y’all?”

Easily said, and obviously you have never been married. :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 16:25:28

Not obvious at all, daahlink!

I make my fiscal non-negotiables fairly upfront. Or as I was told recently, “I learnt long ago that you never joke about money.” ;-)

(Actually, I do.)

 
 
 
Comment by whino
2009-02-12 15:46:01

Us woman have a horrible habit of changing our minds!!! Lol!!!

 
 
 
Comment by VaBeyatch in Virginia Beach
2009-02-12 11:50:16

Local fella passed along this email of a CNBC program coming on tonite:

See how the American Dream became a nightmare

Tonight 8p ET

 
Comment by whino
2009-02-12 12:36:20

How worried was Wall Street about a lack clarity in Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner’s plan to save the banking system through the purchase of toxic debt? So worried that Goldman Sachs called a meeting to figure out how to fix the problem.

Here are some of the upshots from that meeting:

1. While it is better to wait for a good plan as opposed to quick and dirty bad one, time is important. What the group concluded was that the longer the plan takes to produce, the more diffucult the situation becomes. That’s because reviving the securitization market is key toward reviving the economy and it’s a viscious cycle - the longer it takes to revive securiziation, the worse the economy becomes and securized product held by the banks lose more value.

2. Ken Griffen, the founder of Citadel, stressed the need not merely to fix the prices of the securitized bonds, but also that any plan must stabilize the root cause of the problem - the mortgages themselves. And he came up with several ideas to spur homeownership that could revive the housing market.

3. Also some worry over speculation that Paul Volker doesn’t have a more formal role in the process of coming up with a bailout plan.

4. Some actually had met with officials at the New York Federal Reserve after Geithners speech and were told the plan is still weeks away. That wasn’t received well

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Geithners-Bank-Plan-Led-To-cnbc-14341805.html

Speechless!!!!!

Comment by X-GSfixer
2009-02-12 15:48:42

A good plan, executed NOW!, is better than a perfect plan executed a week from now.

So said (as I recall) Patton…….but my experience has been that it is as valid in the business world, too.

 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2009-02-12 17:02:37

“That’s because reviving the securitization market is key toward reviving the economy…”

These guys are truly delusional. We had a functioning economy and a functioning banking system before securitization. We’ll have one after.

It’s fundamentally a question of trust: can I trust that by buying a securitized pool of stuff, I am not _really_ buying a securitized cesspool of stuff.

Trust, one broken, is never quickly restored. Securitization will survive this and come back, and it will not come back quickly, and it better not be the thing upon which we’re pinning our collective hopes of economic recovery.

 
 
Comment by Sekar
2009-02-12 12:56:03

where is professor bear ?

Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2009-02-12 18:56:50

Hibernation?

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-12 13:09:19

Anybody buying? Looks like we are diving in to the close. 804.30 was recent SPX low. 7449.38 was dow’s low in Nov. We already broke more recent lows.

Comment by BanteringBear
2009-02-12 14:05:41

The DOW, down ~200 with only minutes left in trading, rockets up to close down a mere 6 points and change. It was almost vertical. Something just screams manipulation.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2009-02-12 14:43:50

It screamed manipulation to me as well. Just after 3pm, right on schedule.

B*st*rds.

 
 
 
Comment by llcarlos
2009-02-12 13:31:20

The DOW is up 2% in the 30 minutes since the govt announced it would directly subsidize mortgages of poor people.

Comment by Not2Smart
2009-02-12 13:45:16

What exactly is a home loan subsidy? How does it work? And who will qualify? Is this more gobblygook or could it work? Thanks.

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2009-02-12 13:59:52

You bought more house than you can afford, and can’t sell because you are under-water??? No problem. The U.S. taxpayer will make a portion of your house payment for you.

Comment by WT Economist
2009-02-12 14:08:57

What about the living large HELOCs?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-12 14:17:07

Will this even go anywhere? They want to apply a standardized solution to a very much nonstandard problem?

Things are getting curiouser and curiouser - is the PTB afraid of something?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jon
2009-02-12 14:36:12

“is the PTB afraid of something?”

Mass starvation, revolt, murder and a new PTB. The standard stuff.

 
 
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-12 13:58:40

Is that what it was? We jumped from 808 right after my post above approaching recent spx low. That is amazing. The govt has excellent timing.

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2009-02-12 14:01:01

Isn’t that amazing… The market is about to break through support, and poof, here comes a plan to hand the banks billions of dollars.

Comment by pressboardbox
2009-02-12 14:10:47

This has been happening alot lately. Somebody is really scared of the dow going any lower.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Observer
2009-02-12 14:24:00

Now we finally know where all that TARP money has gone.

 
 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-12 14:12:40

Yeah, something didn’t seem right about today. Did pick up some oil stuff after all in the morning - but otherwise it’s just too screwy as they can pretty much “leak” a gimmick everyday if they wanted to.

 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-12 14:14:58

Hooray! We’re saved! They should call the plan ‘Hope Now!’

Oh, wait they already had a thingie called that…and how’s that one going again? *scratches head *
Oh, now I remember! Out of the 400,000 ‘homeowners’ expected to have benefited from the plan, exactly 23 have actually received any ‘hope’. No, that’s not 23 thousand, or 23 hundred…that’s twenty THREE total.

I just barely read that hilarious statistic half an hour ago—I’ll go find the link.

Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-12 14:36:49

I wondered earlier today where the next rumor would originate as we approached the lows. First, the goldman ‘emergency’ meeting followed by the subsidy response. All in all, it’s just another hopa-dope.

Comment by dude
2009-02-12 16:55:31

Yep, look at the after hours numbers.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by cereal
2009-02-12 14:38:21

Like everything else the gov tries lately, I’m sure this will be a tremendous success.

Just try and follow the hoops an FB must jump through to get any benefit from this. This will be last week’s news by next Monday.

On the subject of diminishing returns, we are edging right up to the tipping point of what the world bond market will swallow. The building upward pressure on bond interest rates will be the end-game scenario for gov to continue in this fashion.

 
 
Comment by whino
2009-02-12 15:06:40

“the govt announced it would directly subsidize mortgages of poor people.”

Does this have anything to do with the Obama housing grant ad that says: “never repay everyone approved” ? Or is this another freebie on top of the pile?

Comment by llcarlos
2009-02-12 15:23:52

I didn’t mean “poor people” god knows amny poor people work ahrd and rent or live within their means. I meant FBers of course. If you are an FB and can only afford 1400 of your 2000 dollar mortgage the bank will pay 300 and the govt will pay 300. It’s not sure if a reduction of principle is applied. i doubt the bank writesdown the mortgage.

Comment by whino
2009-02-12 15:36:42

I agree about not bagging on the poor but, I think we already subsidize them with section 8 housing in this country. That is enough, I dont want to pay for them to stay in a house they cant afford, it’s not right to take away from my ability to make my house payment (thru higher taxes) to let them keep a home they shouldent have bought in the first place. IMO.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by hip in zilker
2009-02-12 13:34:15

Can someone tell me if there is a federal income tax credit or the like to offset the expense of installing solar panels on your home? I know that the City of Austin gives a rebate, but I think there is a tax incentive as well.

I own the house outright (bought post bust in 92) and will pay cash for the solar panels.

It has been nice having some much needed home improvements done the last 16 months or so. Before that, I couldn’t even get bids on work - just, “now that would cost you some money.” Meaning: “Get with the program. Your house is a teardown. If you’re not going to build a McMansion, get out of the way and let someone else do it.”

Comment by Blue Skye
2009-02-12 16:17:25

Yeah, I think the bill in October gives a 30% federal credit. Don’t know the details.

 
 
Comment by rms
2009-02-12 13:55:14

The latest Atlantic Monthly has a featured piece, HOW THE CRASH WILL RESHAPE AMERICA, by Richard Florida. Can’t wait to read it tonight!

 
Comment by bluprint
2009-02-12 14:13:27

GSFixer, did you see my response to you about the direct deposit thing? Not the in the bits bucket, but the other one you left.

Looks like there really may have been some type of breach or information loss, just FYI.

Comment by X-GSfixer
2009-02-12 15:57:56

Yeah………the so-called “breach” was at my employer, not at the bank. Somebody supposedly “lost/had stolen” a laptop containing payroll data. Which begs the questions:

-What the hell was payroll data doing on a laptop?

and

-Was it actually stolen? Or was it “five fingered compensation” for a former employee/IT contractor who has been stiffed on a paycheck/invoice?

I’m getting too old for this sh#t…..

 
 
Comment by Shizo
Comment by wmbz
2009-02-12 14:45:13

Don’t worry, won’t work, just another boondoggle that will muck up a system that will correct no matter what they do.

 
Comment by Kim
2009-02-12 15:19:17

Adjust principal amount on a few mortgages and thousands more will demand same or walk away. Banks are hardly “chomping at the bit” for this.

Its all about throwing some hope out there so the FBs make just one more mortgage payment.

 
Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2009-02-12 15:47:57

It isn’t adjusting principle. It is helping you make your payment if you simply don’t have the income to cover the payment. As said above…. Let’s say your payment is $2K a month and you can only afford $1400. Well, then they figure out a way for the government and bank to cover the rest of the payment… probably by adding it to the end of the loan… or make you pay it back when you sell the house.

It won’t work. There will be too many that simply do not want to make ANY payment or that can make their payments but are too far upside down.

Remember the WSJ article about a nation of mortgage slaves? The government is desperately trying to talk us into repaying our debt, but most will choose to simply walk away.

Comment by Shizo
2009-02-12 17:07:15

Thanks for talking me down, I damn near blew a fuze today. I think my co-workers were about ready to tell me to get some happy pillz from my DR.

You are all right it won’t work. But it still steams me to see them attempting to reward stupid behavior…

 
 
 
Comment by potential buyer
2009-02-12 14:29:57

“Housing policymakers weighed but have for now shelved one plan that would have seen the government stand behind low-cost mortgages of between 4 and 4.5 percent, sources said.

Lockhart said that policymakers are eager to prevent a large drop in home values from their current, deflated levels.”

Absolutely mind blowing! Talk about screwing the first time buyer!
Gov. propping up housing prices when people are being laid off or companies are cutting salaries by 10%! (Which they are in Silicon Valley!)

Way to go, Gov. This downturn is now never ending.

Comment by Darrell_in_PHX
2009-02-12 15:35:03

“eager to prevent ”

I guess they are going to repeal the law of supply and demand, since that is the ONLY way of stopping prices from falling A LOT further.

 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-12 15:53:45

“…prevent a large drop in home values from their current, deflated levels.”

So price controls it is, have fun stormin’ the castle boys!

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-02-12 14:35:01

OBAMA BURNED: GREGG WITHDRAWS AFTER POLICIES TOO MUCH TO STOMACH
Thu Feb 12 2009 16:18:14 ET

For Immediate Release:
Thursday, February 12, 2009

Senator Gregg Statement on His Withdrawal for Consideration of U.S. Commerce Secretary

Sen. Gregg stated, “I want to thank the President for nominating me to serve in his Cabinet as Secretary of Commerce. This was a great honor, and I had felt that I could bring some views and ideas that would assist him in governing during this difficult time. I especially admire his willingness to reach across the aisle.

“However, it has become apparent during this process that this will not work for me as I have found that on issues such as the stimulus package and the Census there are irresolvable conflicts for me. Prior to accepting this post, we had discussed these and other potential differences, but unfortunately we did not adequately focus on these concerns. We are functioning from a different set of views on many critical items of policy.

“Obviously the President requires a team that is fully supportive of all his initiatives

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 14:53:12

The Candy-Crappin’ Unicorn™ is going down in a trail of smoke before we even got to the candy. ;-)

Comment by Blue Skye
2009-02-12 15:34:25

Has anyone else the impression that his features seem to be morphing toward self caricature? It has only been a few weeks and the strain is showing.

It’s gonna be a rough road for Mr. Hoover II I suspect.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 17:08:58

It’s gonna be an epic failure.

You can’t fix something that has been broken for 25+ years in a couple of weeks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-12 18:32:07

Negative kitty. Take two tablespoons of audacity and call us in the morning.

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 18:41:29

Facts don’t change to suit your convenience ever.

I lived in Hyde Park for 7-ish years. I’m quite familiar with the South Side of Chicago and the posers it produces.

 
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-12 23:42:38

Funny,

I thought Bush II was the Hoover replica.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by ouro verde
2009-02-12 19:34:57

I like reeses pieces!

 
 
Comment by packman
2009-02-12 14:57:17

Holy crap.

Obama is pissing off a *lot* of people, really quickly.

The power grab for the census was … unbelievable. I’m not surprised Gregg is withdrawing. Unfortunately though now Obama / Emanuel can now put one of their pawns in his place, and the election rigging and stats manipulation can begin.

(Caveat - Bush was not saint in this matter either - his hands are dirty also, but he wasn’t quite as blatant as team BHO).

Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-02-12 15:56:22

(Caveat - Bush was not saint in this matter either - his hands are dirty also, but he wasn’t quite as blatant as team BHO).

Not blatant? Are you serious?

Team Texas Assclown remains the Undisputed #1 All-Time ‘Merican Executive Champion in election riggin’, statistical manipulatin’, power-grabbin’, gerrymanderin’, money-disappearin’, e-mail losin’, report-doctorin’, science-squashin’ and pretty much any other category you can think of where there’s a solid piece of data going into the pipeline and something iffy coming out the other end, all in the service of the “permanent Republican majority” (you remember that catchphrase of Karl’s, right?). They tried to disrupt data collection itself as well, of course, except if it involved illegally infringing on the civil liberties of ordinary citizens.

To compare the two administrations on any sort of data manipulation because of the Census move is patently absurd — Dubby did more egregious things before breakfast on a daily basis.

As an aside, BO had given away too much politically in his attempt to woo Senator Gregg. He should’ve kicked him to the curb already. But it was a misfire all-around for both Gregg and the administration. C’est la vie.

Comment by exeter
2009-02-12 19:10:54

Wow. Your description of the last 8 nightmarish years of corruption is spot on! For sure, no data, institution, tradition or anything else decent remained untarnished. The most disturbing element of those thugs was their expertise at inverting truth and lies. Downright Goebbel-ish.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-12 20:07:12

Well, that’s a duh. What President hasn’t? Or have you forgotten about Bushie baby.

 
 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2009-02-12 15:36:53

Trying out a new name here.

Comment by potential buyer
2009-02-12 16:59:38

Why, are you on the wanted list?

Comment by GrizzlyBear
2009-02-12 17:42:47

Nope, just tired of my old name. I’m GrizzlyBear now.

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-12 20:04:12

Were you once known as Bantering Bear?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by cobaltblue
2009-02-12 18:44:37

Whatever happened to “Craven Moorhead” and “Dr. Ben Dover”?

Comment by CA renter
2009-02-13 06:04:06

Oscar De Low Renta (not sure if that’s how he/she spelled it)

 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
2009-02-12 16:44:36

Back from Orlando again :barf:

I was there over a month ago, there was a shopping cart tipped on it’s side, used as a makeshift chair at a bus stop. Surrounding it was a pile of burgers wrappers and cups.

Today: same cart, same location, more garbage.

 
Comment by exeter
2009-02-12 18:41:32

New bubblology lexicon: Realturd=Paint Chip Eater.

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 19:09:28

Another casualty of the stimulus package became apparent while we were waiting for the final language of the reconciled bill to appear online. It appears that Caterpillar won’t be hiring back any of those 22,000 laid-off workers because of the President’s $789 (Ed: sic) stimulus package, despite the fact that President Obama alluded to words by the company’s executive just earlier today touting the measure.

With the very familiar logo of Caterpillar looming around him at one of the company’s hard-hit plants in Peoria, Ill., President Obama publicly repeated the promise that Caterpillar’s chief executive officer, Jim Owens, might be able to rehire some of the people who were laid off — if the stimulus were passed.

But oops. After the president left, Mr. Owens not only did a turnabout on rehiring; he also suggested there may be even more layoffs. Although he said he continued to support the stimulus package, it wouldn’t result in a reversal of layoffs for anyone: “I think realistically no. The truth is we’re going to have more layoffs before we start hiring again.”

LOL

The Candy-Crappin’ Unicorn™ just don’t be gettin’ no respect.

BWAHAHHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2009-02-12 19:59:17

Don’t be diss’in the Candy-Crappin’ Unicorn™ !!

 
 
Comment by Darrell in PHX
2009-02-12 20:05:30

So, I just watched CNBC’s “House of Cards”. Pretty bland stuff there. Nothing any of us would find informative.

But I did find Greenscam’s comments interesting.

Stuff like:

We trusted business to self-regulate. They knew what thery were doing andall were sure they could get out on time.

We could have stopped it, but not without causing 10% unemployment and aprettybad economy.

and

At some time in the future, we’ll be having this conversation again. It is just human nature.

1) How could ALL get out? Every fool was going to find a greator fool?

2) And, 20% unemployment is better?

3) WHICH IS WHY Voulker said it was his job to take away the punchbowl just when the party got started. THAT WAS YOUR JOB TOO, you crazy old man!

Comment by AnonyRuss
2009-02-12 23:26:44

It was a good presentation, but for anybody already well-informed about the history of CDOs, etc., it might feel repetitive.

There were also a few of those “poor me” parts at Riverside County subdivisions, but not as horrible as some features (percentagewise). Of course, I would have mentioned that the family who left Compton under threat of criminal retaliation could have rented somewhere else instead of borrowing a ton to live in Yorba Linda.

I must have missed articles on that Daniel Sadek character. Interesting stuff.

 
 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2009-02-12 20:15:21

To awaiting wipeout.

My husband has cardiomyopathy. Got diagnosed after surviving a cardiac arrest in 1997. He is doing better now than when he was diagnosed. Quit smoking, started walking, lost weight, got his BP under control. Ejection fraction improved from 25% to 50%.

Not necessarily a death sentence. He may outlive me - his younger, smarter, genetically superior wife. :)

Comment by Happy2bHeard
2009-02-12 23:04:39

This was supposed to be addressed to Ate-Up, in answer to his comment yesterday.

 
 
Comment by vozworth
2009-02-12 20:16:54

I want to built it, but I aint got no money….

full bust, production is done….if your on the third floor…..jump..prey you dont live.

couple of guys working upstairs “aint worth tits on gravy”.

 
Comment by vozworth
2009-02-12 20:20:41

Im actually happy that my tinfoil comment from last night about “technology destruction” was never posted….

Hard to believe Hoz’s last post….last night.

Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 21:40:51

Que post was that amigo?

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-12 21:44:23

If you stand up too quickly, I think your left satellite and your right satellite might have collided. ;-)

Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 21:55:25

Nah my last post was on the Iphone vibrator. hah!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 21:58:15

In response to your post on wearing an IPod on the subway at 2am, it isn’t an IPod its an Iphone personal vibrator.

My last post was censored on the stellite.

It was
“Don’t F**k with the Jedi Master.”
Mr. Mark Hamill in Jay and Jay Bob strike back.

 
Comment by hoz
2009-02-12 22:00:09

“Jay Bob” should read “Silent Bob”

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by B. Durbin
2009-02-12 23:00:08

So my husband and I and the little bubba are looking to buy a house, primarily because said bubba and his accessories are making this two bedroom apartment very cramped. Hubby works for a company with NO debt and huge cash reserves in a position that is both rare and very necessary, and his promotion path is entirely in the same city. And rents for houses around here are laughable, especially with the threat of foreclosure hanging over LLs.*

We’re looking in a price range where PITI is roughly comparable to our current rent. That actually gets close to 2000 square feet, 4/2.

Foreclosures, of course. Nothing else is priced correctly. :)

Anyway, we found a place we rather liked. It needed a lot of cosmetic work (peach and brown stripes, honestly) and a couple of other things, but we’re very hands-on people. We offered $7K below list plus bank pays closing and $1K in Section 1 repairs.

Didn’t get it. But the couple that did get it chose something else, so it went back on the market. So we resubmitted the bid…

And withdrew it immediately upon seeing their inspection, with about $5K in Section 1 repairs and the recommendation that the roof be replaced within two years. That’s a bit more than we wanted to take on.

Now comes the funny bit. Two days after we withdrew the bid, the listing price changed…

To $100 below the cash part of our offer.

Even though we didn’t buy, we changed the list price.

Hee hee hee…

*We received an appeal for help from a couple with kids whose LL had been foreclosed on— they had a weekend to find a home and move, with all of their stuff, and their dogs. I would not want to be in that situation, and unfortunately, around here the bulk of the growth (more than 50% of the housing!) has been during the last eight years, so the odds of renting from an FB are uncomfortably high.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post