February 27, 2009

Bits Bucket For February 28, 2009

Please visit the HBB Forum. Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

387 Comments »

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 00:19:37

Asian REIT markets suffer deepest fall ever
By The Nation
Published on February 24, 2009

Asian Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) markets suffered their deepest ever fall in the second half of 2008 as the global financial tsunami intensified and the availability of credit was further squeezed, according to CB Richard Ellis’s “2H 2008 REITS Around Asia” publication.

Looking ahead, Asian REITs are expected to focus on cost savings and income protection by retaining tenants in 2009. The market may see more M&A activity as some REIT holders cash in their positions to repay debt while property investors take advantage of the current market conditions to hunt for bargain acquisitions.

The market capitalisation of Asian REITs shrank by almost a third over the last six months of 2008 to about US$48 billion (Bt1.71 trillion). Nearly all recorded a fall in value, with only two recording a marginal uptick. Many plunged more than 30 per cent.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 10:32:56

Funny how so many MSM outlets call the situation at hand a “financial tsunami” these days. Didn’t we coin that meme on this blog?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 00:22:43

Singapore ‘is in freefall’
Real estate firms are delaying construction and project launches. (AFP)
AFP on Friday, February 27, 2009

The simple sign announces ‘South Beach’ and calls it ‘Singapore’s New Lifestyle Quarter’ but there is little sign of life at the collection of dilapidated military buildings.

The abandoned camp was to become a $1.1 billion (Dh4bn) luxury hotel, office, retail and residential project known as South Beach.

Instead, it has become a symbol of the global economic downturn. Construction of South Beach has not yet begun.

Cautious Asian property developers are delaying some residential projects and reconsidering others during the worldwide crisis, which has tightened funding and crimped buyer interest, industry players said.

Singapore has been among the hardest hit. Two years ago global real estate firm Jones Lang LaSalle described the city-state’s market as the world’s hottest. Property prices surged 31 per cent overall in 2007.

Now the island nation is dealing with an over-supplied market, said Nick Brooke, of Hong Kong-based Professional Property Services.

“Singapore is in free-fall,” said Brooke, chairman of the regional real estate consultancy.

Comment by mgnyc99
2009-02-28 05:56:05

i thought bernanke said this was contained?

the whole world is in recession

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-28 06:09:25

There’s no recession inside the Beltway.

Comment by taxmeupthebooty
2009-02-28 06:27:49

fed workers will all get raises w no layoffs
will producing only “misery for all

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-28 11:40:00

See, now, I’m curious. Why the ‘ “misery ‘? Was the oddly inserted single quotation mark randomly placed, or was it, as I am coming to suspect, some sort of secret communication with arcane forces, perhaps the Illuminati? Or aliens?
And then the other day you sprinkled slash marks around here and there like confetti throughout your otherwise uncapitalized and unpunctuated and creatively verbed post.
Again, is this accidental, or just taxmebootay playing friskily with English usage, or maybe only your shaky fingers—and I’ve typed many a word when my hands was a’flutterin like car-lot banners in a tornado, thanks to my various bad habits and their effects upon my nervous system, so I understand that, and would sympathize—or was it more secret code stuff?
Come on! Tell!

 
Comment by exeter
2009-02-28 12:45:36

Oly, consider the source.

 
Comment by Kirisdad
2009-02-28 14:10:13

Oly, I have tears in my eyes from LMAO at your last post.

 
Comment by kirisdad
2009-02-28 14:19:06

Sometimes I envision taxmeupthebooty typing hurriedly, dressed in hospital garb, grabbing quick peaks at the nurses station door.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 08:02:49

Beltway recessions lag the real economy’s recessions.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by mikey
2009-02-28 07:39:52

Recession ?

It is Saturday morning and Cato knows it. He sneaks up BEFORE dawn and attacks at will to do daily battle. My house is a total disaster before 7 a.m. Black labs are oblivious to recessions and now he is hiding, resting and plotting.

Who has time for the world and recessions when you need MORE coffee, an old fashioned wood chair and a bullwhip :)

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 10:35:50

Mikey –

I am so jealous! I want a black lab to take my mind off the depressing economic situation…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by matthew
2009-02-28 12:04:40

black labs rule..

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-28 12:18:35

Nuh uhhh! Golden labs rule!
*looks fondly at photo on desk of Murphy, aka ‘Portly McFatty’*
Good old Murph. Now he’s stinking up Heaven with his incredibly potent dog-farts.

 
Comment by Gadfly
2009-02-28 15:20:14

Besides being sweeties, black labs make good watchdogs and perimeter-checkers. They earn their dinner.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-28 00:24:17

Okay,

Have to ask, did our Battlestar Galactica fans watch this week? BTW, 3 more to go. I don’t want it to end :(

Comment by Asparagus
2009-02-28 07:39:10

So Boomer had this plan all along….? Wow.

I have no idea how this is all going to fall out.

 
Comment by Polly
2009-02-28 08:31:41

I thought this week’s ep was a little soap opera-y, but that is just me. And you can’t have 100% action 100% of the time.

Comment by Asparagus
2009-02-28 09:07:21

Agreed. When are we going to get a big blowout battle?

Comment by skroodle
2009-02-28 10:03:48

There is no one left to battle any more…looks like the Galactica will just collapse in a rust pile of bolts all by itself.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-02-28 09:49:17

I thought this week’s ep was a little soap opera-y, but that is just me. And you can’t have 100% action 100% of the time.

No, it’s not just you — the last two episodes were kind of melodramatic.

Three episodes seems like a short arc in which to tie things up, doesn’t it? I’m curious to see what is resolved and what is unresolved, ’cause they don’t have time to do everything.

Comment by polly
2009-02-28 12:26:13

I don’t think it is just the melodrama that makes it like a soap opera, though. It is the melodrama in the piano bar and the fantasy house that makes it a soap opera. Melodrama with more booms wouldn’t be so much like a soap opera.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-28 12:44:46

‘Melodrama with more booms wouldn’t be so much like a soap opera.’

Let’s have more melodrama with booms! :)

 
Comment by wolfgirl
2009-02-28 14:32:59

Big booms

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-28 16:03:56

Big booms are coming.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-28 12:29:40

‘I don’t want it to end.’

I don’t want it to, either. So I’m going to watch the last episodes so drunk that I get total amnesia. See, that way I can watch them again and again, and it will seem like new each and every time.

I have good ideas, I think we can all agree. :)

Comment by Gadfly
2009-02-28 15:34:40

I think we can all agree that you’d be a righteous individual with whom to partaaaaaay! :-0

[BTW, the ethanol doesn't help me anymore--watch BG, that is]

 
Comment by Pullthetrigger?
2009-02-28 18:35:53

Check out “Quix” at freerepublic.com. That’s the best I can do at this point. May God bless you all.

 
 
Comment by Gadfly
2009-02-28 15:26:22

They’re all Cyclons now, aren’t they? They jumped the shark when they started comingling.

What’s left? Just brew more hootch so Starbuck can continue to overact?

I’ve returned to reading when the lil’ women starts watching. Buh-biii.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 00:26:30

I find myself wishing the prophecies made on this blog had turned out to be overblown. Instead, all economic data releases these days tend to turn out worse than expected. What used to be regarded as tinfoil hat is now an understatement.

Economic crisis ‘is as bad as they come’
Carolyn Lochhead, Chronicle Washington Bureau
Sunday, February 22, 2009

(02-22) 04:00 PST Washington - — If 30 years of financial crises teach anything - in Scandinavia, Japan, other parts of Asia and Latin America - the worst is not over for the U.S. economy. But that may be the good news.

This time, a tightly interdependent world has entered a synchronized contraction. Pretty much everyone is in trouble, leaving the world without an engine.

“We are in economic terra incognita,” said Joseph Grundfest, a finance professor at Stanford University and co-director of the Rock Center on Corporate Governance.

If the averages of previous crises hold, Americans can expect unemployment to reach 11 or 12 percent, housing prices nationally to drop 36 percent, stocks to lose more than half their value, and real output per capita to plunge 9.3 percent, according to economists Carmen Reinhart of the University of Maryland and Kenneth Rogoff of Harvard University, who have tracked financial crises back to 14th century England.

“Certainly the averages themselves are pretty discouraging,” said Reinhart. “Because this crisis is as bad as they come.”

Comment by jeff saturday
2009-02-28 05:37:28

“If the averages of previous crises hold, Americans can expect unemployment to reach 11 or 12 percent, housing prices nationally to drop 36 percent, stocks to lose more than half their value, and real output per capita to plunge 9.3 percent,”

Could be the opportunity of a lifetime if

You are in the 88% that is employed
You buy a house after the huge price drop near the bottom
You are buying stocks after their 50% decline (dollar cost averaging) that regain half their value in 5 years

That`s my plan anyway, maybe I`ll get crushed too.

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 08:49:15

I will only buy index funds in 401k… in IRAs (roths for me) I will buy individual stocks … because only some co’s are worth it.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 10:53:57

“I will buy individual stocks … because only some co’s are worth it.”

Do you have insider information available to help you pick those IRA-worthy stocks, or is it just your superior judgment that will help your hand-selected portfolio to outperform the choices made by all the quants working on Wall Street?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 11:05:41

It’s called reading a bunch of boring balance sheets and trolling the internet for useful info… fun summer reading (not)…

Might even use the advice of Warren Buffet’s old mentor. If enough fat drips out of stocks as they roast over the coals, those “outdated” 1950’s metrics may come back in fashion.

I don’t have to be the smartest guy in the room, just smarter than the 90th percentile.

If anything, I tend to be too cautious, but as we’ve seen on HBB, NOT screwing up (like, say, buying a house in early 2006) pays very well!

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 12:39:09

“It’s called reading a bunch of boring balance sheets and trolling the internet for useful info… fun summer reading (not)…”

Given the pain involved, you ought to expect to earn something in return for your effort. But do you really expect to outperform dumb dollar cost averaging into index funds at the end of the day? Especially by an amount that justifies the labor involved?

If you are into that sort of thing, then more power to you…

 
Comment by Milkcrate
2009-02-28 14:19:59

Yessir. Anyone buying “the dips” now should be well stocked on Dorritos.

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 18:32:58

PB, I make $12.50 an hour at my day job. It is CERTAINLY worth the labor involved!

And given the steaming heaps of crapola those automatic indexes buy, I’m quite certain I can do better than the indices over time. Remember all those private equity IPO’s in 2007?!?

 
 
 
Comment by polly
2009-02-28 09:17:17

Why would you assume that conditions exist for stocks to gain that sort of ground that quickly after this recession ends? Even if you assume that economics is enough of a science to say that restarting an experiment with the same starting conditions will produce the same results, you are likely dealing with very different starting conditions this time around.

Yeah, I just read Mauldin’s letter for this week. It is depressing.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 10:37:50

“That`s my plan anyway, maybe I`ll get crushed too.”

Excellent! It’s an exciting time to dollar cost average when you cannot even tell whether the ship will make it back in to port before it sinks.

Comment by Tim
2009-02-28 11:10:55

I am with Jeff. People get trapped in bubbles because they believe things have changed forever and historical data is meaningless. Let’s not allow fear to paralyze ourselves at the bottom based on the same misplaced belief system. My 401k is 25% invested in equities right now with break even at 780 on the S&P and I will continue to shop on the dips. We may fall much further, but my house fund is still in CDs. Either way, I come out much more ahead than if prices remained flat and I was getting 15% interest on cash savings (e.g., if stocks start rising near term, my 401k goes up and housing continues fall which is where i will dump my house fund in a few years; if stocks fall another 50% I will start investing my house funds in once in a life time opportunties). That’s why I don’t whine about my rollover CD returns. Predicting a crash is of no economic benefit if you are to scared to grasp the opportunities presented thereby.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Tim
2009-02-28 11:18:31

Note that I am not implying that if stocks go up housing will fall which would be counter-intuitive. I am just saying stocks may go up so I am hedged. With respect to housing, short term appreciation is impossible at these levels no matter what the government does IMO, so housing going up near term is out of the question and not a consideration for me.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 12:40:45

Tim — You are preaching to the choir, bro’…

 
Comment by exeter
2009-02-28 13:09:09

“Note that I am not implying that if stocks go up housing will fall which would be counter-intuitive.”

Why is that counter intuitive? I watched housing fall or stay flat throughout the tech bubble, circa 1995-2000.

 
Comment by Tim
2009-02-28 14:05:12

I was referring to a direct relationship. One might normally think if wealth is increasing housing would go up, but because of the over supply and increased lending standards, this will not be the case in the short-term.

 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2009-02-28 15:23:19

You’ve forgotten the “worse than expected” factor. :wink:

 
 
Comment by qaxbami
2009-02-28 05:40:28

Just a thought. We used to complain that the MSM was in denial, continuing to see the housing market and the economy through rose colored glasses. Now the MSM is filled with stories of imminent collapse and destruction. With the MSM as a lagging indicator, could this mean the bottom is near?

Comment by oxide
2009-02-28 05:56:44

I don’t believe the MSM is lagging in this case. They love to report bad news as it’s happening.

Now, anticipating bad new, they don’t like to do that. Especially when they filled their coffers with real estate ad money.

No bottom yet. My predicition is early optimism in 2009, total capitulation in early 2010 when the rest of the resets kick in. Improvement in summer of 2010. Midterm elections will be interesting.

Comment by Asparagus
2009-02-28 07:44:44

I interned at a TV station years ago. They sold emergency broadcast advertisement slots. Meaning advertisers payed a lot more to be shown during a plane crash or natural disaster coverage.

I wouldn’t be surprised if numbers that come in “way below expectations” cause the same treatment for the finance channels.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 10:55:48

Wonderful point, and to add to it, the sheeple who are addicted to teevee also enjoy stories about endless stock and housing market rallies. So it is natural for the MSM to exaggerate both the upside and downside to the extreme.

 
 
Comment by hd74man
2009-02-28 08:13:58

RE: Improvement in summer of 2010.

Care to inform us as to WHERE all the people previously employed in our nail-painting, submarine sandwich shop making, non-essential service sector “Foo-Foo Economy” are gonna go back to work?

Oh, that’s right, everybody’s gonna have a $50k, paper shuffling bureaucracy job, with 5 week paid vacations, 12 paid holidays, top-line health care with a 5% contribution, reimbursed sick leave, family care off-days, and a big fat pension @ 50 working for the federal government in O’Bama’s Brave New World.

I feel better now

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 08:53:11

I still see people employed at those service sector jobs. They or their family own the business; all their wealth is tied up there. So they will cut back and keep it rolling.

Who is out of work? Construction sector, real estate agents, mtg brokers (maybe they go back to spam scams?), “stagers”, “feng shui experts”, furniture factory floor workers, furniture salesmen, car salesmen, artists, musicians … all hustlers, all will find their bread somehow.

Except construction, but they will get in on the stimulus bread one way or another.

 
Comment by kirisdad
2009-02-28 09:28:58

May be hard to do since infrastructure spending makes up less than 10% of the stimulus plan.

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 09:36:53

Well, that or get back into pot dealing…

 
Comment by In Montana
2009-02-28 09:47:10

‘I still see people employed at those service sector jobs. They or their family own the business; all their wealth is tied up there’

How can that be? you mean govt contractors?

 
Comment by polly
2009-02-28 09:49:48

“Oh, that’s right, everybody’s gonna have a $50k, paper shuffling bureaucracy job, with 5 week paid vacations, 12 paid holidays, top-line health care with a 5% contribution, reimbursed sick leave, family care off-days, and a big fat pension @ 50 working for the federal government in O’Bama’s Brave New World.”

Just for the sake of accuracy:

Five weeks of paid vacation (actually 26 days - 8 hours per two week pay period) doesn’t start until you have 15 years of service - first three years it is 13 days. Between three years and 15 years, it is 20 days.

It is 10 days paid holiday, not 12 - New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Day, Presidents Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, and Christmas Day. Every once in a while, the president will give federal workers Christmas Eve or Boxing Day off, but only if the former is a Monday or the later is a Friday. Federal workers never get the day after Thanksgiving off without using leave.

On average, federal workers pay 25 to 30% of their health insurance premiums and 100% of dental if they choose to purchase it. Dental has only been available in the last few years. Children are dumped off parental health insurance the day they turn 22, even if they are full time students.

Family care days off come out of your sick leave or your annual leave. No accumulated sick leave (like a woman who used all of hers up after having a baby) or regular leave means no pay for taking a day off to care for sick family is available. Unpaid leave is available in exactly the same way that it is under the Family and Medical Leave Act for other employees of large employers. Oh, and zero paid maternity leave.

You cannot retire with a pension at 50. The lowest age is 55 and that is only if you have 30 years of service. Since most long-term federal workers start with the government in their 30’s, they don’t hit retirement eligibility at anything like 55, though, of course, there are exceptions. Also, for anyone who started in the federal government after sometime in the early 80’s, the pension is only 1% of last year’s pay for each year of service, so after 30 years you are only getting 30% of your last year’s pay. Not all that juicy a pension, at least not compared with state and local employees. In the old retirement system, pension was 2% per year up to an absolute maximum of 80% after 40 years (maybe a smidge more if you had a lot of accumulated sick leave), so that was better, but you can’t get that anymore. For workers in the newer system, there is a 401(k) program (with up to 5% matching) to make up for the lower pensions.

Not all federal workers are paper pushers, but plenty are. So are lots of people in the private sector.

O’Bama - Could someone explain to me the appeal of pretending the president’s last name is Irish? I don’t get it.

 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2009-02-28 10:30:35

My county in western WA just registered an unemployment rate of 13.1% for January, with expectations it will only worsen over the coming months. Realistically, it’s over 20%. I have never seen so many businesses close so quickly in my life. All of the little espresso huts are shut down, numerous eateries and small shops, as well as other businesses.

A friend who is a contractor called to say he and his wife are splitting up. She is a realtor, and they are really hurting financially. The sad thing is they have 3 young kids.

Interestingly, the small taco shop on wheels (parked in the lot of a convenience store and gas station) has been bustling. Why? I think it’s their prices. They are very affordable, with quick service. Other eateries with high overhead are done. They depression is here, in these parts.

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 11:10:02

He is part Irish; Irish people are clannish as heck. (I’m one too.) Irish Democrats of my acquaintance were quite pleased to find out he was Irish (using the one-drop rule–but Irish do indeed do this, witness Pat “3/4 German” Buchanan) and adopted him as one of their own.

Plus, he ran with the big dogs in the Senate, including some big time Irish Catholic legislators.

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 11:19:32

Want to comment about paper pushers: when I worked in the white collar world, many of my coworkers were either doing the work they were paid for but spending hours goofing off (ie, they could have been finished in about half the day) or they weren’t doing the work they were paid for (ie, skating until they got canned/caught).

I was such an idiot that I worked my tail off, actually asked for more assignments and wowed my bosses (although I made some idiots among the incompetents/lazy/ne’erdowells).

I can see why a lot of smart people get frustrated and go to work for themselves.

It amazes me that in the blue collar world you MUST work to get paid–yes, even the lazy asses must actually SHOW UP and then WORK THEIR HOURS–yet we are called lazy, cheaters, don’t deserve to get paid. Even on this blog I’ve been told we deserve to live in poverty, etc.

If your excuse for why you should surf the internet from your desk and get paid much more than blue collar AND pay less taxes AND tell us we’re lazy is that you spent years in school, I have news for you buddy: so did I. In fact, I got a phys degree, which is a HELL of a lot more work than English, Spanish, History, or Classics.

Heck, I took Classics classes in college and got MUCH HIGHER grades than the majors.

But it’s okay if you make more money than I do, because I keep more of it.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-28 11:32:23

Once again polly I learned from you and you are a voice of reason.

 
Comment by polly
2009-02-28 12:21:40

Welcome, SFBAreaGal, but seriously, there isn’t much of interest there. I guess it is sort of interesting that fed workers don’t really have the benefits that people assume we have, and that state and local benefits are much better. Just remember, federal unions have to negotiate against the federal government, not some two bit local county administrator. It isn’t always easy.

The real interesting thing is to ask what good is paper pushing? Now I admit that there’s a whole lot of wasteful paper pushing in the world. Lots. But some paper pushing is meant to gather information and send it on to people who have to make important decisions. With the information, they at least have a chance of making a good decision. Without that information is it a total crap shoot, and with lobbyists all over the place, worse than a crap shoot. I prefer to live in a world where senior members of the executive branch and members of congress and their staffs have the opportunity to make decisions based on statistically valid facts, not anecdotes from a few loud, well-connected constituents and hugely well funded industry lobbyists.

Now, just like you can lead a horse to water but can’t make him drink, you can lead a politician to facts, but you can’t make him or her put aside ideology or financial interests. But I do believe we can have a better world when the watering hole exists.

Then there is all that enforcement stuff we also do while maintaining a - guess what? - a paper trail. Yup. There it is. More paper.

 
Comment by Silverback1011
2009-02-28 13:05:17

I’ve pushed paper for both the feds and in private industry most of my life, and while I haven’t made millions, it’s kept a roof over my head a lot of the time, with due credit to my 2 husbands also, made the car payment, kept the family in health insurance, and sometimes was the only way we put food on the table. Yay to paper pushing, I sez. And I believe that any blue collar worker whose slaving away certainly deserves his or her pay, plus benefits, by the way. NAFTA was the worst piece of legislation passed in this country in the last 50 years, in my opinion.

 
Comment by Blano
2009-02-28 13:32:06

Silverback, that’s about all I’m doing right now by Metro Airport today, pushing paper, but hey it’s a job, and gives me time also to learn trading to boot.

Don’t make a lot, and thinking about being a desk jockey for another 20-30 years makes me die emotionally, but as far as a “place” to work, it’s tough to beat.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-28 13:44:47

‘My county in western WA just registered an unemployment rate of 13.1% for January, with expectations it will only worsen over the coming months’

Yar, I saw that too. So you live in either Lewis, Gray’s Harbor, and what was the other county with 13%?
And I agree–it’s more than 13% actually.

 
Comment by SDGreg
2009-02-28 16:33:04

“Welcome, SFBAreaGal, but seriously, there isn’t much of interest there. I guess it is sort of interesting that fed workers don’t really have the benefits that people assume we have, and that state and local benefits are much better. Just remember, federal unions have to negotiate against the federal government, not some two bit local county administrator. It isn’t always easy.”

polly,
That’s an excellent post on federal workers. What I find most astounding are the benefits of some state and local workers, much better than even the best benefits for any federal workers ever. I also find it amazing that California state workers get 14 paid holidays, almost three weeks off every year just for “holidays”!

Another thing that’s misunderstood is that unions for federal workers are often quite different than those for state and local workers. Most unions for federal workers don’t bargain over pay and benefits, only working conditions, and membership is voluntary though every worker in the bargaining unit is covered by the union whether they pay dues or not. My experience has been that federal unions often serve as a useful check on management actions that could be harmful to the public.

In general, I’d say the pay and benefits for higher-skilled federal workers lags somewhat higher-skilled workers for the better private sector companies while for lower-skilled workers, compensation is probably better for the feds than the private sector. At the executive level, there is no comparison - the private sector is mostly greatly overcompensated.

 
Comment by silverback1011
2009-03-01 05:31:15

Hey Blano, when are we going to start a Michigan HBB’er meet-up ? We are only miles apart and I’m not really sure what to do about the $ 69,900 repo in my neighborhood, if anything…..this is at 40 percent of where it was at its peak.

 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-02-28 09:21:32

The subprime resets in 2007 / 2008 and resulting foreclosures left the banks in critical condition + on life support. The Alt A and Option arm resets peak in mid 2011. Suspect we won’t start to see some sort of a recovery until 2012.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-28 06:02:00

Maybe, maybe not. Spring 2009 seems to be a pivotal time as the collective social conscience has been trained to expect a recovery right about now. The current doom and gloom in the MSM is a function of that anxious anticipation.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 07:23:06

Expectations for a recovery coupled with the reality of very few qualified and willing buyers will keep the resale housing market in near-shutdown (i.e., liquidity drought) mode for the near term. The basic problem is that would-be sellers have been given hope that the market will soon bottom out and that prices will be supported, which will serve to encourage them to ask higher prices than they would if the government stayed out of the way and let market forces run their course. This false hope encourages most would-be sellers to keep their homes listed above current market value at levels where they will never be able to sell, at least before the market completes a long round trip to the basement and back.

But with unemployment continuing to ramp up (over 10 pct in CA according to yesterday’s data release), a dearth of household savings juxtaposed against stiff increases in downpayment requirements and prices falling at the fastest rate in history (according to last week’s S&P/Case-Shiller data release), the demand pool of willing and qualified end-user buyers is shrinking.

Hence the demand side of the market is cratering, while the supply side is, if anything, swelling, thanks to the high rate of foreclosures and forced sales due to job loss or ARM-breaking resets. Increased supply, reduced demand and deluded sellers with unrealistically high listing prices fuel a perfect storm of a liquidity drought coupled with continued price declines.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Little Al
2009-02-28 07:34:44

Prof?
I have always felt the bottom of prices will be 2012. After that, the bad mortgages dry up considerably. Do you feel the RE market will dip below 96′ lows adjusted for inflation?

Or could something slightly more sinister be slouching our way with a rogue state unleashing their nuclear strength or civil war in previously stable regimes?

 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-28 08:37:33

Same thing happened with shareholders of Citi, Bank of America, Wachovia, Wells Fargo, AIG, etc. etc. They waited and waited and waited, hoping the government would save them.

 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2009-02-28 10:39:18

“Do you feel the RE market will dip below 96′ lows adjusted for inflation?”

I’m not the Professor, but I think that 1996 prices in nominal dollars are a given. In Reno, NV, there are condos selling for 1975 prices in nominal dollars. Consider that. It’s ugly out there.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 11:01:05

“Do you feel the RE market will dip below 96′ lows adjusted for inflation?”

FPSS has been forecasting a return to 1983 prices, but I am unclear whether this is in nominal or inflation-adjusted terms. I personally don’t see why prices at the bottom should be any higher than 1983 levels in inflation-adjusted terms, given the
end of easy money crazy lending, but nominal may be a stretch. I am also not sure how many years into the past we are talking about to get to the inflation-adjusted 1983 level.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 11:40:32

“I’m not the Professor, …”

That should work to your advantage. So far as I can tell, most professors consistently produce overly optimistic forecasts, compared to which all data releases turn out ‘worse than expected.’

 
 
Comment by Jimbo
2009-02-28 08:01:51

Atlantic City Press had mid-week report on how the summer rental market is allegedly blooming from Cape May up through Atlantic City. Head of local realtors’ group was quoted to effect, “The Wild West rafting trips and Grand Tours of Europe are out; Summer at the Shore is in big time!” We’ll see. Also went on about how “it’s different” at the Shore, blah, blah, never seen so many “bargains,” etc., etc., better hurry before they’re all “snapped up” by savvy out-of-towners, and so on. Boy, do I want to see these Cape Cod-sipping hucksters crash and burn!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by WAman
2009-02-28 08:13:06

For the past few years I took a vacation after I teach summer school on the Oregon coast. In years past I would have had to book my early August vacation almost 2 months ago. Not this year as the rental agency is offering discounts up to May 15 right now and none of my favorite houses are currently rented in June, July or August right now!

 
Comment by hunkydory
2009-02-28 14:40:38

the devil’s in the details Jimbo: I read a similar article about the Wildwoods that hyped the booming rental activity. The numbers? An 8% increase over activity this time last year: hardly boom-times after 2008’s performance…

Jersey shore rentals w/in a block or two of the ocean can set a family back $3500-$4000 for the week, and thats minus food, entertainment, gas, etc. That kind of money would go a long way on a cruise or all-inclusive resort.

Here’s an alternative: last spring I got a deal on a bay-fishing boat off ebay. I sanded the boat & trailer down to bare metal and rivets, and rebuilt them with stuff from ebaymotors and harbor freight and other less-reputable sources (almost named it “No Left Turn” for the traffic signs I used to reinforce the seat mounts). :-)

My Jersey Shore outings set me back the price of a few gallons of gas, food for either end of the fishing line, and the odd toll or ramp fee. There’s a great sense of adventure for kids, or adults who haven’t done it before. Plus traffic is circumvented, I’m never commited to go if the weathers bad, and always a fresh seafood dinner at the end of the day (brine up the baitfish then add oil and you’ll swear you’re eating anchovies!) :-D

 
Comment by ahansen
2009-02-28 22:12:09

Love the handle, Hunk.
I assumed that’s what you named your floating “project?”

 
Comment by hunkydory
2009-03-01 04:58:28

I did indeed, my courageous friend! ;-)

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 07:09:55

How can the MSM be a lagging indicator that a bottom is at hand when all data releases turn out “worse than expected”? I will tell you what sign to look for an MSM indicator the bottom is at hand: Look for the articles about how real estate is the worst possible investment, including cautionary tales about the myriad flippers, flim-flam men and specuvestors who lost everything; when you see those, a bottom may be at hand or at least fast approaching. We are not there yet.

By contrast, I note the MSM has already concluded the stock market is a great place to throw away money; not so much for real estate, yet.

Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-02-28 09:16:41

A datum supporting that sentiment: in an article about Buffett today, the following was posted:

“Berkshire also recently invested in bonds issued by companies including Tiffany & Co. and Harley-Davidson Inc. These securities pay 10% to 15% a year, according to Justin Fuller, editor of Web site Buffettologist.com and a partner at Midway Capital Research & Management LLC.
“These investments offer equity-like returns but are higher up the capital structure,” he said. “It’s a no brainer.” ”

When the MSM is running stories about analysts/money runners people calling buying bonds in rapidly-declining, money-losing companies (which have high prices as one of their main features) “no brainers”, it’s hard to imagine that the MSM is ahead of the curve on what is happening.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-28 09:47:02

I really doubt that Buffett is this foolish.

While he may have invested in these things, that money was probably yanked a long time ago.

There is still a ways to go before junk bonds become attractive. We’re not there yet.

 
Comment by measton
2009-02-28 10:36:37

Buy the bonds and short the stock?

Most likely scenario is they barely survive stock collapses and you make a killing.

Worst case scenario is they collapse completely so you get some money back on bonds, and make money with your short.

No chance scenario - Their stock goes to the moon.

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-28 18:19:02

Yeah, capital structure arbitrage. He’s done it before.

 
 
 
 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 06:03:55

BWAAAHAHAHAHA!!

I, and some others, were rereading Mackay’s “Extraordinary Delusions and the Madness of Crowds” back in 2005. The way this was going to play out, in a macro sense (of course, the details change as to which useless financial instrument is involved and how badly the gov’t has been overspending), was patently obviously. Galbraith’s “Money, Whence it came, Where it went” was also a great read.

However, if you so much as suggested the inevitable crash was, indeed, inevitable, you were crazy. “Watch out for those black helicopters.”

This whole mess has been obvious from the get-go. Eerie parallels to the French “land bank” fiasco.

Head for the hills? No, I think not. The Netherlands, France, and England did not revert to the Middle Ages after their financial crises, and neither will we. But do bubbles implode and leave a giant, smoking crater in the economy? Oh, yes, yes, yes!

As for the tinfoil hats, so far the “Amero” is still a pipe dream. In all honesty, I do not see this happening.

 
Comment by WAman
2009-02-28 08:06:37

I thought the stock markets already have lost 50%. So how much farther do they fall?

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 08:54:54

82% after the Great Crash in 1929. Took a couple years to grind all the way down, after a false rally or two.

Comment by NoSingleOne
2009-02-28 15:19:41

91%, according to Wikipedia’s references.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 18:39:28

Well, there you go. (I read 82% the other day, or I think I did, or for some reason that stuck in my mind … my memory is not terribly reliable.)

 
 
 
Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-02-28 09:23:01

If Person A invested at the top and continues to hold, he can’t lose more money than he’s already lost.

If Person B invests today the same amount of money that Person A had invested at the top, and the market mimics the 1929-1932 period, Person B will lose significantly more money than Person A has lost so far.

Another way to say it is that someone taking his losses on an initial investment of X at this stage during the GD lost much less than someone investing X today and selling at the bottom.

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 09:38:40

Huh?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-02-28 09:57:06

PP1 - Once you’re down 50%, you’ve lost .5x can’t lose more than another .5x. Check.

PP2 - If the market is down 50%, but ends up losing more than 75% from the top, the person beginning his investment when it is down 50% loses a greater percentage of his money from top to bottom than the person who invested at the top has lost until today. Simple percentage arithmetic. Check.

Upon re-reading, it seems perfectly clear, except perhaps the last paragraph: change “today” in the 2nd-to-last line to “at a comparable stage in the 1929-1932 downturn.”

 
Comment by polly
2009-02-28 09:59:15

I agree with gator. That makes no sense at all.

Plug in a number.

Person A invested $100 at the top. Has already lost about 50%. Continues to hold. Market goes down to 10% of the top and he loses more to having lost 90%.

Person B buys now and market goes down to 10% of the top, he has lost 80%.

Person A loses 90%. Person B loses 80%. Person B is better off, but I don’t want to be either one.

Did you mean that Person A sells right now? ‘Cause your example says “continues to hold.”

 
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-28 10:03:00

He’s smoking the Maui-Wowie, dude!

Only amount of money invested and percentage returns matter. That’s it.

 
Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-02-28 10:27:05

Polly - why do you say plug in a number and immediately revert to percentages? My statements are all correct.

Person A starts with 100, now has 50. Maximum additional loss is 50.

Person B now invests 100. Market goes down 75% from top, meaning 50% from here, he then has 50. Market goes down more than 75% from top, meaning more than 50% from here, he now has less than 50.

His loss investing THE SAME AMOUNT as Person A is greater than Person A’s loss UNTIL NOW.

Jeez.

 
Comment by polly
2009-02-28 11:11:10

But you said that Person A “continues to hold.” Who cares if he loses the same that he lost before on the way down? When you are losing 100%. who cares where the 50% mark falls?

 
Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-02-28 11:24:19

Your reading is flawed. I made a point in PP1 that had to do with Person A’s situation through time relative to himself. I made a SEPARATE point in PP2 that involved the relationship of Person B to Person A. It is VERY CLEAR that my point in PP2 relates to Person B with a beginning time frame today and Person A with an ending time frame today. Do you not understand the words “UNTIL TODAY”? Please re-read my original post. Also, both of these points were related to the initial posting and were not ad hoc postings.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 11:43:51

Person A is an apple and person B is an orange. Why dwell on apples-to-oranges comparisons?

 
Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-02-28 12:06:52

PB - To show that the person getting in today can still lose more than the person getting out today - something that is proven by historical precedent but is not intuitive to many people. Apples-to-orange is not a good characterization.

 
Comment by exeter
2009-02-28 14:24:31

“Your reading is flawed.”

LMAO… Yeah Polly. How did you get that J.D. with that “flawed reading”?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 17:20:38

“To show that the person getting in today can still lose more than the person getting out today…”

Now I get your point. Sorry to be dense (I am some times…).

 
 
 
Comment by skroodle
2009-02-28 10:16:31

Until the P/E gets to 5-8 would be my guess. A P/E of 15 is still very high for a bear market.

Comment by polly
2009-02-28 10:22:53

Especially when E is still dropping off a cliff.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-02-28 10:44:30

A negative P/E is possible. In such a case, the LOWER the P/E, the greater the market valuation.

Any math-challenged readers want to take a crack at that one? Polly? not a gator? FPSS?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 11:22:55

I think you’re talking about absolute value. With absolute value a large negative P/E (large distance from zero) is greater than a small positive P/E (short distance from zero). However, without applying absolute value, a negative P/E is ALWAYS less than a positive P/E, no matter how small.

-20 < 0 < 5

Does that explain it?

 
Comment by polly
2009-02-28 11:24:39

Yah know, Paul, you being a bad writer doesn’t make gator, Faster and me bad at math. But tell me what your highest ever score on the Putnam Exam was, and we can talk about it.

 
Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-02-28 11:37:32

Smaller means “farther to the left on a number line.” Since P must be greater than or equal to zero, E must be negative. Thus the larger the P, the smaller the number, and the greater the market valuation.

You’re the one talking about absolute value. If you convert to absolute value my statement does not hold.

 
Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-02-28 12:01:23

Polly - I’m not a bad writer, and I’m better than you at math. Get over it.

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 18:45:31

Paul, you are making no sense at all. A negative P/E is still negative. Are you trying to compare negative P/E’s for their relative less-sh*ttiness? If so, I apologize. I thought you were implying that some Yahoo!Finance style analysis tool might break, mixing up the money makers and money bleeders.

Hmm, I was sleepier than I thought this morning.

I will add, once the P/E goes negative it’s a rather useless metric. I would suggest comparing value of outstanding shares to net liquidation value instead.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 00:35:46

To all the glum news below I add a homeless indicator: My wife and I attended the San Diego Symphony Orchestra concert tonight, and I felt as though we had some how wound up in the Davies Symphony Hall area of San Francisco instead, as there were more homeless people milling around and bedding down along the streets downtown than I have ever seen before. It is really sad to see this.

Wall Street Journal
* FEBRUARY 28, 2009
Economy in Worst Fall Since ‘82
Output Sank 6.2% Last Quarter; Plunging Trade, Investment Signal Trouble Ahead
By CONOR DOUGHERTY and KELLY EVANS

The U.S. economy deteriorated far more than previously thought in the fourth quarter, according to new revisions of government data, casting fresh doubt about the chances of a recovery this year.

With falloffs in consumer spending and exports, gross domestic product declined at a 6.2% annual rate in the fourth quarter of 2008, according to a Commerce Department report Friday. The agency’s first estimate for GDP, reported in January, was for a 3.8% decline.

The more recent figure — which represents the steepest dropoff since the depths of the 1982 recession — raises pessimism among economists. Until recently, many had been hoping for a rebound in 2009 and now sound downbeat about the remainder of this year.

Besides the revised GDP, economic indicators for the first two months of the year point to a deepening recession — and the prospect of a dismal first quarter, too. Every week in February, more than 600,000 people filed new claims for unemployment insurance, and the unemployment rate rose to 7.6% in January, from 7.2% in December.

“The first quarter is going to be bad,” said Christina Romer, chairwoman of the Council of Economic Advisers, at an economics gathering Friday sponsored by the University of Chicago and Brandeis University. She told the audience that Obama administration officials have been watching with deepening concern what’s been going on around the world.

The U.S. has been hurt by the synchronized nature of the current global downturn. Exports declined at a 24% annual rate, compared with the 20% rate previously reported. Meanwhile, it appears the world’s other economies truly fell apart in the fourth quarter. India reported on Friday its fourth-quarter GDP growth was lower than expected, while Japan said last week its GDP had contracted more than 12%. Growth in both Europe and the U.K. fell at an identical 5.9% annual rate. These numbers mean the U.S. can’t lean on its trading partners to buy goods and help buoy business activity.

Private investment, which encompasses everything from business spending to homebuilding, fell at a 21% annual rate in the fourth quarter. That portends poorly for the first quarter of this year since one company’s cutbacks in spending can lead another to do the same.

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 06:27:22

Who are these economists who are taking gov’t figures at face value and why do they still have jobs?

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 07:43:51

Part of their job might be to take govt figures at face value as a point of departure for subsequent analysis. If you worked for the govt, would you spend lots of time and energy trying to poke holes in publicly released data? I would guess probably not.

 
Comment by denquiry
2009-02-28 11:06:43

economists, like the presidents and all the pols tell you what they are told. they are not their own man (woman). they are bought and paid for.

 
 
Comment by cereal
2009-02-28 07:50:38

I am both humbled and sobered by what’s going on. I can no longer find any humor in any of this.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 07:59:15

Ditto. I cannot even find humor in the stuff that Rush Limbaugh says anymore.

Comment by AnonyRuss
2009-02-28 08:24:23

So, you are not a Dittohead?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 11:03:26

“Ditto.”

Perhaps my feeble attempt at humor was a bit too dry for you?

 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-28 09:31:11

‘I cannot even find humor in the stuff that Rush Limbaugh says anymore.’

My Sweet Jeebus, NO!
* claps hands to face in horrorified consternation at PB’s sorry state*

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-28 10:04:31

Yeah, why are people going easy on the schadenfreude? We’re just warming up for the real event.

Pension funds, baby!!! It ain’t over until a few big ones croak and the PBGC needs to get bailed out.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 11:09:25

Speaking of ditto heads, do you see the connection between followers of Rush and members of the LDS fold? In both cases, we see large masses of people who can’t think independently priding themselves on blindly following what someone else says is true. Since when did blindly following demagogues become a badge of honor? Isn’t this what got Germany into trouble around the mid-20th century?

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 11:28:08

PB, you’re killing me. But don’t forget that loyalty is considered a virtue. Dawkins, who grew up in England, speaks of being told that those who followed orders which led to their unnecessary, even stupid death, were the epitome of virtue. (As an evolutionary biologist, this concept interested him a great deal.)

FPSS–too true! I tried telling my coworkers two years ago that pensions were not, repeat, were not safe. They believed me about money market funds but not pensions. Egads!

Of course, working for the city we always have taxpayers to fall back upon … ha ha. Taxpayers are sick of paying more and more (especially when their money is being burned in the Ironwood swamp gas), no pay raise for us … hmm, screw the new workers (not all of them are young, I might add!) for the pension holders?

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-28 11:52:09

‘…do you see the connection between followers of Rush and members of the LDS fold?’

There’s a difference?
No, really. I would think the overlap would be complete. I don’t know even one Democrat Mormon. Oh, wait, yes, I do, two of my sisters. They are. ‘Course, I raised them right, first of all, and also they like to be difficult and upset my Mormon mom, so that’s why. This is in Utarr, so I suppose there could be some Democrat Mormons living somewhere else, although I find that hard to believe, and of course they would be denied a temple recommend, I should think.

Seriously, I don’t know why Rush wasn’t called upon to become the next LDS Profit when the last old guy was called to the Celestial Kingdom. Oh, wait, I meant ‘Prophet’. Oh, wait, no—I did in fact mean ‘Profit’.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-02-28 12:26:11

The bloggers here who hate me know what gets my goat when they call me a Republican or a Rush Limbaugh dittohead. I cannot stand Rush Limbaugh. He’s a social conservative and I puke at social conservatives. I’m an atheist hedonist.

 
Comment by tresho
2009-02-28 12:32:12

I did in fact mean ‘Profit’. “Beware of false profits.” Matthew 7:15-20

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 12:36:28

“But don’t forget that loyalty is considered a virtue.”

For this reason a prince ought to take care that he never lets anything slip from his lips that is not replete with the above-named five qualities, that he may appear to him who sees and hears him altogether merciful, faithful, humane, upright, and religious. There is nothing more necessary to appear to have than this last quality, inasmuch as men judge generally more by the eye than by the hand, because it belongs to everybody to see you, to few to come in touch with you. Every one sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose themselves to the opinion of the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them; and in the actions of all men, and especially of princes, which it is not prudent to challenge, one judges by result.

For that reason, let a prince have the credit of concurring and holding his state, the means will always be considered honest, and he will be praised by everybody because the vulgar are always taken by what a thing seems to be and by what comes of it; and in the world there are only the vulgar, for the few find a place there only when the many have no ground to rest on.

“The Prince” (written in 1513)

– Niccolo Machiavelli –

“The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:
and there is no new thing under the sun.”

Ecclesiastes 1:9-14

 
Comment by CrackerJim
2009-02-28 13:00:09

“…large masses of people who can’t think independently priding themselves on blindly following what someone else says is true.”

This description applies to a whole lot more groups than Rush followers and is certainly not confined to conservative or right wing opinion holders.

 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2009-02-28 15:24:51

What about people who say an invisible voice from the sky tells them what is right and wrong? Sounds to me like a lot of the world’s problems would disappear entirely if they would do the same.

I wish the people who believe that all corporations are good and hiding behind the skirts of the “free market” would get raptured as well.

Here’s to atheistic hedonism! 8)

 
Comment by Gadfly
2009-02-28 16:04:56

When freedom fails
the best men rot in stinking jails,
and those who cry Appease! Appease!
are hung by those they tried to please.

–Horace Mann (as I recall)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 17:22:48

“What about people who say an invisible voice from the sky tells them what is right and wrong?”

I already mentioned religion (at least the LDS variant).

 
Comment by dude
2009-02-28 22:20:21

“Speaking of ditto heads, do you see the connection between followers of Rush and members of the LDS fold?”

It’s a good thing that church leaders have been preaching self-reliance, avoiding debt like the plague, and food storage then, isn’t it?

You don’t shine when you single out a group for attack. I’m astonished you can’t see what you are participating in when you do so and then reference the Nazis.

BTW OG, a member of my stake presidency is a card carrying Dem, and I think none the less of him for it. Also, while I’m a registered pub I didn’t vote for a single one in the last election, and my rep. is LDS!

Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are advised from the pulpit to study the issues and vote for the candidate that best adheres to the principles in which they believe. They are not advised from the pulpit to vote for any individual or party.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-03-01 07:12:25

“I’m astonished you can’t see what you are participating in when you do so and then reference the Nazis.”

You missed the point. I was throwing out the Nazis as an example of where blind adherence to demagogues can lead the populace. I was not singling out the LDS church in my example. In fact, it was Lutherans and Catholics in Nazi Germany who were Hitler’s dupes.

 
 
Comment by In Montana
2009-02-28 09:54:22

same here. I would never call myself a dittohead but he most always made me laugh. Now he’s just furiously trying to do CYA for *my* party…by golly this “depression” stuff is all in Nancy Pelosi’s mind!! why, this bad economy began with the ‘06 Congress!

fuggeddaboutit.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Spearmint_Tea
2009-02-28 08:29:37

Cereal, it’s my birthday today and I am furious at the new escape from america.
Which is worse, wall st or DC st?
Is anybody still excited about Obama?
I hate being white.

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 08:56:45

Which part, the high susceptibility to skin cancer or the high life expectancy? Or the combination of skin cancer plus life expectancy meaning that you will spend half your years looking like Alan Greenspan crossed with Jabba the Hutt, but with red splotches, from the cancer treatment?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2009-02-28 09:09:07

Seriously, who came up with this whole pale skin idea in the first place? I mean, yeah, it ups the amount of vitamin D you make in your skin and thereby keeps the kiddies from getting crippling rickets in northern climes, but other than that, what good is it? it wrinkles at a younger age, it burns easily and it gets cancer more readily. Dump the pale skin and pick up some fortified milk or some fish already.

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 09:41:02

But it’s so cuuuuute on a baby, lol.

Ice age –> pale is in.

Thinned O3 layer –> melanin is the new black.

 
 
Comment by Cassandra
2009-02-28 09:24:31

Let us not forget that light eyes are more susceptible to cataracts!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Gadfly
2009-02-28 16:06:47

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!! My eyes!!!!!!

 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-28 09:42:11

‘it’s my birthday today and I am furious at the new escape from america.
Which is worse, wall st or DC st?
Is anybody still excited about Obama?
I hate being white.’

Well, Happy Birthday, ya big grump.
Loudly sings ‘Happy Birthday to you, Happy Birthday to you, HappyyyyYYYYY BirthdaaaYYYYy to yoooooo, ya great big self-pitying grummmmmppppp, Happy Birthday to yoooooo…’

Wasn’t that pretty? I thought so, too.
Now, go eat some cake, drink some beer, and paint your whole entire white body orange and silver using house-paint and a roller brush. Maybe that’ll cheer you up.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-02-28 09:56:38

… paint your whole entire white body orange and silver using house-paint and a roller brush.

Oly, Oly, I’m surprised at you.

The Creamsicle Superhero bodypaint is a fabulous birthday idea, of course. I wish I’d thought of it myself. Kudos!

But you forgot to say “Make sure to add copious amounts of glitter to the housepaint, ’cause glitter makes everything better.”

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-28 10:39:43

‘But you forgot to say “Make sure to add copious amounts of glitter to the housepaint, ’cause glitter makes everything better.”

And it really does, too.
I’m glad you’re here to remember these details. :)

 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-02-28 12:03:58

Heck, I forgot to say something, too: if you have any housepets (say cats) or lil’ babies handy, well, rope ‘em in.

They make excellent sidekicks. I can say with a high degree of certainty that they enjoy being dipped in glitter-infused housepaint and trundled around as second bananas to your badassed birthday superhero self.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-28 12:20:44

ET,

A late happy birthday to you.

 
Comment by Silverback1011
2009-02-28 12:47:54

Yeah, but glitter itches when you sit on it naked. Especially in your personal area. I found this out when I woke up in the drunk tank down in N.O. during Mardi Gras buck naked when I was about 22. ( Well, it makes a fabulous story anyhow . )

 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-02-28 13:34:13

Thanks, SanFranciscoBayAreaGal.

Note: I did not actually glitterify any cats or babies on my birthday, though we did reenact scenes from Gone With The Wind and the original Star Trek (the episode with the doppelgangers).

 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-02-28 13:56:09

Silverback, don’t let one drunken blowout sour you on the ineffable pleasures of glitter. (Though, yes, one should be mindful of where shiny abrasive particles should or shouldn’t be. Ahem.)

Give it another whirl, I say.

 
Comment by hunkydory
2009-02-28 17:25:39

Comment by Silverback1011
“Yeah, but glitter itches when you sit on it naked. Especially in your personal area. I found this out when I woke up in the drunk tank down in N.O. during Mardi Gras buck naked when I was about 22. ( Well, it makes a fabulous story anyhow . )”

well that explains the silver in your back, but it doesn’t explain how it got wedged in permanently… did you ever manage to find out?? :-D

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 18:49:53

ET–the episode with doppelgäaut;ngers? That’s like every third episode!

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 18:52:11

&auml; … d’oh

Doppelgänger

still sleepy now… god, I’m lazy…

 
 
Comment by hip in zilker
2009-02-28 10:30:41

Spearmint Tea -

Can’t help you with the being white and hating it thing -

but Happy Birthday anyway

hope you do something you enjoy a lot today

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by speedingpullet
2009-02-28 09:49:58

Ditto cereal - I was just commenting on that to the husband last night.

About 3 years ago I got into an argument with some friends about the coming housing crash. I’d just started reading this bog, and was comforted to see that I wasn’t the only one that saw that there was something really, really wrong with prices in L.A.
My friends, of course, looked at me as if I’d sprouted an extra head when I said that housing would crash.

And now, it turns out, I was right.
Back then, I just sort of expected the housing bubble to pop - in a nice orderly way that reduced prices and made property more affordable.
I never realised that it would also mean so many people pushed to the edge both financially and emotionally, in order for it to happen. I guess I didn’t really think it through. My bad. Be careful what you wish for.

Half of me still goes “hah! Told you so”, but there’s another half that’s genuinely dismayed and downright sad at how things are unravelling so fast.

Comment by tresho
2009-02-28 12:35:50

I just sort of expected the housing bubble to pop - in a nice orderly way that reduced prices and made property more affordable. There were plenty of comments & citations on the HBB two or more years ago about the consequences of economic bubbles popping. I read a few of those things & grokked that the Housing Bubble would not end well.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by speedingpullet
2009-02-28 12:49:23

What can I say? I’m naiive and gullible. And a perky optimist most of the time.

I think the thing I really wasn’t taking into account is the fantastic number of jobs that have been lost.

CA’s unemployment numbers came out yesterday - 10.1% - that’s one in ten of the working population.

While I had popcorn ready for the inevitable demise of the construction/RE/Lending industry, I guess I didn’t see how bad the collateral damage would be for all other employment in the state.
No matter if you’re a proud homemoaner, or a renter, its got to be tough.

 
Comment by tresho
2009-02-28 13:55:30

I hope all you optimists will endeavor to persevere, but keep yourselves well informed.

 
 
 
Comment by Anthony
2009-02-28 10:04:44

Actually, I find humor in it. In Eureka, California, home prices are now higher than San Diego. Three years ago, they were half San Diego’s. Prices here simply won’t go down. Restaurants are still packed. The mall is still busy. However, there are lots of unemployed but since they all get SSI and/or are dope dealers, they are doing OK, too.

Comment by speedingpullet
2009-02-28 11:10:15

Oh don’t get me wrong - I’m evil enough to find a lot of humour in it - especially when I go the the listings and see $1million ++ houses in Malibu still sitting, after being on the market for 2 years
…or the place in Topanga that increased its price to $3.4 million, because it wasn’t quite twice the price of other comparables in the area, at $2.9 million.

What makes me sad is the sweet little house, literally across the street from me - I can see it from my kitchen window as I wash up.
It used to be rented by a nice couple, who discovered their LL had gone into foreclosure. They put an offer in for $460K, in late 2007, which the bank laughed at and told them to take a hike. Which they did, to a house 2 streets away, with the same floorplan, for $375K.

That was 18 months ago. The place has been offered for $390K, then $350K, then $330K and now $299K. And still no offers.
During the storms we had last month, one of the palms fell over in the front yard - and there it still lies. A few weeks back someone pried open the gate to the back yard, in the dead of night, leaving it swinging open in the wind.
The local kids - of all people - have taken to keeping an eye on the place, as there’s a half-empty pool in the back, and they don’t want other kids to fall in and drown.

Its a sweet little house, less than 1600 sq ft, with a nice back yard and a pool. Its not been garishly ‘updated’ or anything, just a solid little home, on a nice quiet kid-friendly street, in a decent blue-collar neighbourhood.

It just makes me sad, and mad, to see a real home of value getting trashed like that, because the bank was too short-sighted to take a gift horse when it was offered one.
It would make a great home for a young family, and now its slowly going derelict.

At this point, I’ buy it myself, if we weren’t in the process of moving near to the husband’s work.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2009-02-28 10:52:59

It is deeply troubling, cereal. Yesterday, I happened to drive by the food bank. It was a very sad situation, with more people standing in line than I’ve ever seen.

 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-28 09:28:22

What did you go to hear, PB?

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 11:58:22

It was truly a musician’s concert:

Mendelssohn Hebrides Overture
Dvorak Serenade for Strings
Brahms 2nd Piano Concerto (Yefim Bronfman, soloist)

The pieces on the program worked together in beautiful synergy. I actually heard wisps of the Overture and the Serenade at different points in the Brahms, which I never before noticed (and I have listened to that concerto countless times).

Bronfman gave a towering performance of the Brahms — I don’t think the composer could have played it as well! The program notes contained some delicious tidbits:

- In correspondence with friends, Brahms referred to the work as “a tiny, tiny piano concerto with a tiny wisp of a scherzo’;

- Brahms himself found the technical challenges of the work daunting; by the end of his inaugural tour as soloist with the Meiningen Orchestra, he referred to it as “the long terror.”

There was nary a hint of terror in Bronfman’s commanding performance :-)

Comment by GrizzlyBear
2009-02-28 12:40:58

It would be so awesome to be a classically trained, professional musician. I finally had enough of not playing an instrument, and have been teaching myself to play the guitar (started last year). It’s going quite well, actually, but on a completely different level than what you’re used to, though thirty something year old fingers just don’t respond the way I had hoped. Still, I can now play most of Stairway to Heaven- never having taken so much as a lesson, and that’s good enough for me. :)

What do you play, Professor? I think you mentioned the violin, but I cannot recall. When I was in first grade, there was a virtuoso named Sarah who would play for the class on various occasions. When some kids were still crapping their pants, she was playing with adults. Unbelievable.

PS- I have not taught myself to read music (something I plan on doing), so I find tablature, and play by ear.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by exeter
2009-02-28 14:47:37

Tab is plenty good enough for playing contemporary stuff. The difference between me and a trained musician is that it takes me 3x longer to learn a song and fill in with the band.

 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2009-02-28 20:17:45

Cool, ex. I remembered you play the guitar. Actually, it seems there are many here who do. I’m just a hack, but I’m happy with my improvement. One day I’m going to treat myself to a nice acoustic (would love a used Martin). I’m not worthy yet.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-03-01 07:26:26

“It’s going quite well, actually, but on a completely different level than what you’re used to, though thirty something year old fingers just don’t respond the way I had hoped.”

I am a string player — guitar was first, followed by violin, viola and most recently, mandolin.

Regarding the thirty-something fingers, I have often heard people say that only kids can learn to play a musical instrument well, not so adults. But I have seen notable counter examples; for one, my wife has taught adults who did admirably well. Secondly, a friend of my sister’s took up piano around age 40, and invested a couple of hours a day of practice time to it. He played Chopin for us when I visited her a couple of years back, and at a level that very few kids would be able to play after a similar duration of lessons.

I am convinced that (after controlling for innate ability) the key difference between child and adult music students is the opportunity cost of practice time. Unless they are independently wealthy, adults have to give up free time of high value to invest in practicing. Kids have more time than they know what to do with — mine frequently complain of being bored, in fact — but trying to get them to channel a little of that time into practicing can be as fun as pulling teeth! I believe if one conducted a controlled experiment, using as subjects children and adults of similar musical aptitude and no music lessons in their background and giving both treatment groups music lessons with the same teacher and having them practice equal amounts, the adults would progress more quickly. The problem for most adult learners is the willingness and/or ability to allocate the practice time.

 
Comment by B. Durbin
2009-03-01 17:28:36

I taught myself to play recorder as a teenager and found it far easier than the recorder lessons in class in third grade. (I love me my alto recorder, BTW. It is a thing of beauty.) The increase in dexterity more than offset the decrease in absorption level.

Furthermore, if you keep up your learning as an adult, the process of teaching yourself a new skill is not as rusty as it is for some people who stop aggressively learning once they leave school.

Honestly, a kid will learn faster in general, but an adult will learn the subtleties faster. It’s never too late. If you want to learn an instrument, go for it!

 
 
Comment by polly
2009-02-28 12:42:40

Oooo….nice one. And they didn’t make Dvorak go last. They almost always make him go last. Doesn’t seem right, somehow.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Silverback1011
2009-02-28 12:59:10

Tonight is the Detroit Symphony Orchestra for us. Going to hear a straight baroque concert - my favorite - with Pachebel’s Canon, Bach’s Brandenburg #1, & Handel’s Water Music. It’s so baroque that it don’t need any fixin’.
I only have to go see “The Watchmen” with my husband next week as a fair exchange. Oh yes.

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 18:54:34

Watchmen is an awesome story; I hope they didn’t mess it up too much for the movie.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 23:00:05

The Dvorak Serenade is not really a closer, unless for strictly a string orchestra concert. The New World Symphony or the G Major Symphony (No. 8, I believe) are another story entirely.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 00:45:49

FT dot com / US Daily View
The End of Exuberance
John Authers

Bad news on Citi, GE and US GDP pushed the S&P 500 to its lowest level since 1996

“The last time we were at these levels was the week when Alan Greenspan made his famous speech about irrational exuberance.”

With the US stock market all the way back to 1996 levels, can the housing market be far behind? And which is a worse investment: Houses or stocks?

Comment by Will
2009-02-28 03:38:28

Houses are still worse investments. Stocks still pay about 2% per year in dividends. Houses cost about 2% per year in maintenance.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 07:24:51

Houses cost about 40 pct per year in home equity losses in CA as of late. Who gives a rat’s arse about maintenance costs when you are looking at this kind of decline in market value?

Comment by mikey
2009-02-28 08:07:04

State takes over credit union

Regulators seize reins of Prime Financial over ‘management structure issue’

(State of Wisconsin’s new buzzwords for big-time FRAUDS)

It is the first takeover of a credit union by state regulators in eight years.

Prime Financial’s troubles are intertwined with one of the Milwaukee area’s largest mortgage bankers.

It’s among a group of credit unions that own Central States Mortgage Co. The Wauwatosa mortgage bank was founded in 1992 by Richard Jungen, who left the firm in July. A racketeering lawsuit filed against Jungen and other former top executives this year said he was terminated in part because of his dealings with Interim Funding, a separate company he created with former Central States employees, the lawsuit says

and, as usual,… “Sources said Friday the FBI is investigating the relationship between Interim Funding, Central States Mortgage and the credit unions that own the mortgage banker. Leonard Peace, a spokesman for the FBI, declined to comment.”

Now IT begins :)

http://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/40461072.html

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Terry
2009-02-28 09:03:37

Has anyone in Wisconsin been watching the M&I bank. In Eagle River, they took a 5 million bath on a marina, and in Three lakes the bank forclosed on a 14 million dollar condo complex. The condo complex is about three years old and none sold. M&I stock was trading for about $44.00.
I think this is the next regional bank to bite the dust.

 
Comment by mikey
2009-02-28 09:58:01

Watching them closely. They sucked up around 1.7 billion of Fed money in the last 4-5 months.

But they DID cancel a few freebie Country Club golf memberships.

Oh..the many scarifices the M&I exec’s makes for the little people :)

 
 
Comment by Will
2009-02-28 09:51:51

Bear, anybody who realizes that the earlier appreciation was spurious. That 4% annual difference over the 12 years since 1996 makes up a tidy sum of anybody’s nest egg. Price changes are not yelds.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 11:15:05

“Price changes are not yelds.”

Surely you understand that investment returns consist of both yields and capital gains (losses)? If you have to sell because you lost your job when home prices are off by 50 percent from the peak, you could easily take a capital loss that wiped out a lifetime of 2 percent yields (and all the worse if, as in your example, the yields are negative because they are ownership costs).

 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-02-28 12:21:23

“Houses are still worse investments. Stocks still pay about 2% per year in dividends. Houses cost about 2% per year in maintenance.”

Vanguard 500 index fund TTM yield as of 2/27/2009 is 3.68%

 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-28 06:06:43

Which has a greater degree of portability, liquidity, and flexibility?

There’s your answer.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 07:39:49

Unless you have a mania driving the price of unportable, illiquid, inflexible assets to unsustainable heights, don’t market forces normally compensate investors by making such assets (e.g. houses) relatively more stable in value / appreciation relative to the type where investors can pull the plug all at the same time (e.g. stocks)? My guess is that various government-sponsored efforts to encourage everyone to buy a home coupled with asset price stabilization mechanisms implemented post-Black Monday have clouded the comparison of asset classes by quite a bit.

 
 
Comment by combotechie
2009-02-28 07:58:14

“And which is a worse investment: Houses or stocks?”

Can I add a third investment? Can I add in plain ol’ cash?

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 08:01:19

I thought you liked cash (cash is king, etc…)? Are your asset class preferences shifting?

Comment by combotechie
2009-02-28 08:14:02

Nah, I threw in my cash statement as sort of a dig to all those who have been on my case for “cash is king” for the last year or so.

Cash is king and will remain so until it isn’t. And we are a long way aways from isn’t.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 11:19:08

I suspected that, like myself, you were merely razzing our resident gold dealers. No asset class is sacred, but convincing greater fools that some asset classes are better than others is a good way to separate them from their money. It has happened a lot in recent years — the cases of tech stocks, houses, gold and oil all come to mind.

 
 
 
Comment by Best Wishes
2009-02-28 15:02:40

Cash in not only king, but Queen and Royal Family. There is no better place to be right now but in cash or its equivalent. Cash in my hand and depreciating assets in someone else’s hand, now that’s planning. America is having the mother of all “Fire Sales”. Fortunes are both made and lost in times like this. Bring it on!!!!!!!!!!! It’s about time the savers of the world have their day in the sun.

My parents taught us that Slow & Steady wins the race and to save, save, save. Debt was a 4 letter word in our family. Thanks Mom & Dad.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2009-02-28 08:07:39

“…And which is a worse investment: Houses or stocks?”

In which country? ;-) (Hwy begins humming America the beautiful)

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-02-28 04:43:01

Exit Strategy! ROTFLMAO! The FED,the Treasury&Gubmint in general is like watching a dog chase it’s tail… They need an “Exit Strategy” indeed.

Fed Officials Weighing ‘Exit Strategy’ for End of Recession
By Michael McKee

Feb. 28 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve’s efforts to bolster credit markets and revive growth pose a long-term risk of provoking inflation and worsening other problems that must be solved quickly when the crisis wanes, Fed policy makers said.

Central bank officials, after cutting interest rates almost to zero and more than doubling Fed assets to $1.9 trillion, should design an “exit strategy” that will enable them to steadily reduce credit, Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser said yesterday. He spoke at a New York conference that included economists and five other Fed district bank presidents.

The Fed, already facing congressional criticism for invoking emergency power to expand its balance sheet, may face political pressure to keep interest rates low and credit abundant when economic growth resumes, Plosser said. Inflation may surge unless the Fed can withdraw monetary stimulus in a timely manner and fulfill its mandate to keep prices stable, he said.

“It is difficult to make credible commitments to price stability when the implementation of policy is disconnected from such an important policy objective,” Plosser said. “The absence of an exit strategy, or an entrance strategy, creates uncertainty.”

The need to start curtailing credit isn’t pressing, central bank officials said. The economy contracted at a 6.2 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter of 2008, the worst performance in 26 years, the Commerce Department said yesterday.

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 06:29:06

OMG! The hard money men are back! Yes, the fellows that caused “the recession within the Depression” back in 1936!

Wow.

 
Comment by tresho
2009-02-28 12:40:38

Renunciation of the National Debt would be a good exit strategy. Or pulling the National Guard out of New Orleans.

Comment by Gadfly
2009-02-28 16:23:33

1 out of 2, so far. Seeeeeyah, camo dudes!!!!

 
 
 
Comment by Curt
2009-02-28 04:59:57

Comment seen in the Orange County Register regarding an article where some realestate type was calling a “bottom” in Mission Viejo:

” Everything looks like a bottom when your head is up your butt!”

Comment by hip in zilker
2009-02-28 10:34:15

I think that’s a comment worth getting repeated a lot…

 
 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 06:26:14

News from Gainesville

This has been a busy week.

First off, County Commissioner Rodney Long sent a private email to Mayor Pegeen Hanrahan, asking the City Commission to consider purchasing the property “Mom’s Kitchen” at it next meeting (in less than a week).

What is “Mom’s Kitchen”? It was a soul food restaurant, quite beloved, but the old proprietor passed away a few years ago and after a brief stint with another chef who then got a better gig, the dilapidated building in the chronically poor district that was the first African-American neighborhood in Gainesville has lain empty.

Hanrahan moved the discussion to public email, chastising Long, but went ahead and moved the item up anyway. Long went around telling everyone that the widow who owned the place now had lost so much money on it and her creditors were calling. Long was representing her as her Realtor™.

Long asked for $165K. I would estimate the building is worth, realistically, $30K to $50K at absolute max, with owner-operator. This is because of high energy bills and realistic expectations of net income at that location. Apparently, it was purchased in ‘06 for $300K and assessed at a whopping $400K.

The City Commission voted to acquire the property at that outrageous price, taking the money out of a $400K fund intended for a fleet garage facility (which had been put on hold because the ‘hood they wanted to put it in woke up and went all NIMBY on their asses), with Donovan the only dissenter. I don’t even *like* Donovan, but I’m so pissed at Mastrodicasa and the other commissioners I don’t even know who to vote for in the upcoming (March 24) elections. I know Mastrodicasa has at least one opponent who is anti-GLBT, so screw that, and Selwach is running, but he deals in stolen bicycles… probably even my two stolen bicycles… so I can’t vote for him either. There is no socially liberal, fiscally responsible candidate emerging so far. RAGE.

The state ethics board should be investigating Long and Hanrahan right about now, anyway.

So Long makes about $10k on the deal, and since it’s a short sale on a commercial prop, hence a recourse loan, I can only figure that the owner’s creditors will still be coming after her, so it’s Long who needs to pay his “beels”. Other realtwhores in town are all bitching about the deal (because they wish they had such connections–total condo sales in Jan: 9), and the rumor is that other family members with a stake in the property are going to hold up the sale.

The City Commission pulled a classic “Operation: Get Behind Darky” when justifying their decision to bail out their buddy Rodney Long. They claimed it had something to do with their “plans” for the ‘hood and preserving “pride”. How does it preserve “pride” to have the city buy a property and leave it vacant or tear it down? It came out that the property is in such crummy shape that the City cannot use it for any purpose. Empty lots and boarded up buildings sounds like urban decay to me. Besides, if they wanted to save the neighborhood, they wouldn’t have sat on their hands six months ago when the guy who owns a major chunk of HUD housing there (remarkably, rather quiet and low crime HUD housing–it was never gunshot central) decided to boot everyone out onto the street and turn it into condoze. One City Commissioner, I wish I could remember which, made the inane comment that they did it for “East Gainesville”. MOM’S KITCHEN IS IN NW GAINESVILLE!

Oh, and at the same meeting, they voted to throw millions of dollars into the swamp, er, “Ironwood Golf Course”. One of two municipal golf courses nationwide that loses money, so I hear. With what they want to spend on renovations on a golf course that runs an operating deficit of $200k to $500k/yr, they could give the front line employees AND managers nice raises!

In other news, a man was dead in the backseat of his BMW and public works ticketed the vehicle 7 times before the cops were called and they found a stiff in the back. The man had been reported missing, but I don’t recall the cops really put the APB out to the public at large. Anyway, ugh.

And, finally, NASA and the FTC? I think seized a whole bunch of assets from an Iranian-born nuclear physicist who had used gov’t grants to funnel money to his sons to buy RE and cars. I guess he couldn’t live on his $111K UF salary. Obnoxious Realtwhore Bill Rohan, who knew this guy personally, was going around telling everyone who would listen that this guy was “totally innocent”. Bill explained it like this: “Well, he has a business on the side–all the professors do–to make money. Then he funnels grants to his business. Then he pays himself a salary out of the business, that’s legal. I think some employee of his complained.”

Um, no Bill, that’s not legal. In the grant application you state how many people you are going to hire and what they are going to be paid. There are specific guidelines for their pay–10 years ago it was about $20k, probably more now. From the more detailed Alligator article (the Sun sucks), yes, an employee DID complain. He was paying his actual employees less than what the grants allowed while setting up his sons as “employees” even though they lived out of state. That is misappropriation of funds, and I hope he goes to prison.

Comment by skroodle
2009-02-28 10:35:29

Deals in stolen bicycles? LMAO!

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 11:35:15

He’s a pawn shop dealer and despite all the police scrutiny (which you would think would entice somebody to take measures to stay clean), he’s been busted time and again for dealing in stolen goods. It’s funny, because there are many pawn shops and other used goods dealers in town, but they don’t seem to have these problems as much. Heck, Oaks Pawn helped the cops arrest somebody last month.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-02-28 06:28:01

“In his first televised speech before Congress, President Obama asserted that prosperity will return once the government restores the flow of credit in the economy. It may come as a surprise to him, but an economy cannot run on consumer loans. Furthermore, credit stopped flowing in the U.S. for a very good reason: there was no more savings left to loan. Government efforts to simply make credit available, without rebuilding productive capacity or increasing savings, are doomed to destroy what’s left of our economy.”

Schiff

Comment by measton
2009-02-28 11:05:28

Government efforts to simply make credit available, without rebuilding productive capacity or increasing savings, are doomed to destroy what’s left of our economy.

Aren’t efforts to rebuild infrastructure,and energy efficiency efforts to rebuild productive capacity? Aren’t efforts to strengthen the middle class efforts to increase demand? The government can’t build factories, it can only stimulate demand and create an environment that favors productivity.

The right leaning types will say productivity won’t increase if the gov drives up borrowing costs (via it’s own borrowing),but the reality is that even if money is available no one will lend and no one will borrow if there aren’t any customers able or willing to make purchases. That’s what we have right now. The middle class is shot, destroyed by outsourcing our labor to slave labor countries. The problem was hidden at first with the deflationary effects of slave labor, and then with a credit bubble. Everyone felt wealthier, but as they say the tide has fallen and we can see that America has been swimming naked. Standing on the beach however are the CEO’s and top Hedge Fund Managers. Next them sits a mountain of swim trunks and bikini’s.

Comment by NoSingleOne
2009-02-28 15:54:16

Do you ever suspect that “conservatives” bankrupted the system on purpose, in order to deliver the final “coup de grâce” on evil government?

It has to be on purpose…they used the “free market” to do it, and got elected to the presidency for 20 of the last 28 years, coinciding with Laffer curve economics. All of the large government institutions that our parents relied on are in danger of failing while the wealthy have grown phenomenally rich as they became more underfunded. “Trickle down” hasn’t resulted in any tangible gain in jobs that I can see.

The whole thing is just a complete sham, and should be considered a treasonous betrayal of national security.

Comment by kirisdad
2009-02-28 16:45:19

No, I never suspected that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by In Montana
2009-02-28 19:31:48

Pat Buchanan was dead set against free trade and wanted tariffs. Most the right dumped on him though.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2009-02-28 16:55:33

Or, to put it even more succinctly, if your citizens can’t afford to consume in a 75% consumer driven economy, there won’t be any prosperity.

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2009-02-28 06:38:21

Is there anyone else in education that wants to rap with me today? I feel like I got into education for all the right reasons, and now it’s just the worst. Any of you move on from education? What did you do?

Comment by DowninSanAntonio
2009-02-28 06:56:57

I was in education for almost 9 years. It was fun to see the “lights turn on” in the minds of so many people. However, the personal and economic costs were very high. I finally step out into consulting and have thoroughly enjoyed it. I have found that I get a really good dose of “teaching” when I interact with other consultants and clients on projects.

I also found as a teacher that I was always reading about the really interesting challenges in my field, but never involved on the front line. As a consultant, my phone rings and I am on the front line everyday. I think that there is alot to be said for educators that have experience but there are very few of them these days.

I would jump out of education again and look for teaching opportunities while solving problems on the “front lines”.

Good luck

Comment by Muggy
2009-02-28 07:06:12

Thanks, Down.
It’s amazing how I was able to see the problems with housing, but simultaneously not see them with schooling. I’m embarrassed!

I do get lots of call from people in different industries running ideas by me, so I have thought about consulting. My FIL is a consultant and has been for 30+ years, so I know the business a little. I won’t starve because I still have a few side gigs that keep da chedda flowin’.

I figure if I work as hard as I do now, but for myself, I’d probably do quite well. I just never felt like starting a business, not because of the risk, but because it doesn’t take much to make me happy, so teaching was a good fit. But now that my fate is in the hand’s of developer cronies, I’m ready to move on. I just don’t know how anyone can avoid the reach of the crowd. I HATE ‘EM!

Comment by Muggy
2009-02-28 07:08:40

I mean *that* crowd.

As in, I don’t want so-and-so, who is chair of some failed bank, and buddies with the local developers, deciding “what’s good” for kids.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by silverback1011
2009-02-28 07:35:56

Muggy, my daughter is a 1st year teacher of language at a middle school on the east coast. She’s taught for 1 year prior to this job. She’s in there swinging but the kids are “socially disadvantage” and have very little idea of how to behave in a classroom = talking constantly, being sassy, telling her she’s a racist, etc. She’s actually doing pretty well. I come from a family that has many generations in the teaching field, so I’m not unaware of the challenges. Fascinatingly, although 3 of the teachers on staff have cancer and 2 more have bad cases of rheumatoid arthritis, rendering them practically immobile, and although the average age of the staff being around 40, the principal took away her classes for 1 1/2 months because the average score of the preliminary testing for the big “No Child Left Behind Act” testing was a little under average, and they’re afraid that the school will fail. The principal did it to her and 2 other newbie teachers. The other two never came back, but she’s made of sterner stuff. She went to see him to find out what was going on, and he shoved a box of Kleenex at her and told her the news. She shoved the Kleenex right back at him, and said, ” I have a class to teach.” He still put he into tutoring failing kids and put in a teacher employed by the district especially to raise kids’ scores. She’s getting her classes back in 3 weeks. I told her ” buck up” and all that, but it really amazes me that with the age and illness level of their staff, that administration doesn’t get it that they have to make these new teachers want to stick around. The teacher next door to her who is dying of cancer told her that she’s a lot better than he was when he was starting out, and that his kids are so bad that he would have been overjoyed with her test scores in his classes. They don’t mess with him, though - been there too long and he’s very ill. I think she’ll be a principal some day. Man, she’s got the iron in her spine. Everybody thinks she’s a softie because she’s blonde, blue-eyed knockout, but they don’t know her too well.

Muggy, there’s something to be said for being able to retire after 30 years with lifetime health insurance and a great pension. I’d think about it if you already have a lot of years in, but I’d never blame you if you got out. Good luck, man. How’s Little Muggy doing ?

 
Comment by combotechie
2009-02-28 08:04:00

Such as “No child left behind?”

 
Comment by WAman
2009-02-28 08:27:57

I am a very happy teacher and I have been teaching for almost 8 years now. I teach in a high poverty area where 78% are on free and reduced lunch. I teach science at the high school level. Each year I start out by giving the students a homework assignment on day 1. The assignment is to write down what respect looks like from a teacher to a student, student to a teacher, and student to student. The next day they work in groups of 4 and make a poster and present their ideas to the class. Over the next few days I talk about respect on multiple ocassions. I have very few problems the rest of the year!

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 09:26:16

Good plan!

In general, I found the teachers who garnered the most respect were those who assigned a real assignment on day one, to be turned in the next day. Those that didn’t, had trouble keeping the class moving along for the rest of the semester.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-02-28 09:44:38

WHOA …From a DJ point of view something is very wrong because i am in Shock and Awe how many kids today can’t read write or speak English. Do we have such mediocre teachers?

I get dozens of emails a week from music people bands dj’s etc. NONE of them seem to know how to communicate properly and sound at least like they finshed the 8th grade.

I would probably get fired the first day for demanding students speak English without swearing and not GHETTO

————————–
Such as “No child left behind?”

 
Comment by Paul in Florida
2009-02-28 10:20:51

I always taught a full class on the first day (mostly undergrad econ in a middle-tier state u.). I spent about 10 minutes on the syllabus only - mainly explaining the testing and cheating policy, and warned them that this would be the most intellectually challenging class that most of them had ever taken. If any first-semester freshman signed up for the class, I had him see me after class and generally encouraged him to drop.

A question you often (used to) get in college is: how many classes can we miss? I simply said, you are expected to attend ALL classes. (This was pre-attendance policies - I called roll two or three times to learn names and then would quit.) The hour you spend in here will be the most productive hour you can spend in this course almost all the time. Occasionally I might have an unproductive teaching day, but that’s a bad bet to make.

I had always heard that you should teach to the middle of the class. I rejected this philosophy and taught the class on as high a level as reasonable, digressing as necessary.

I always showed up 30 seconds to a minute late to class (except on test days) so that I could start immediately and it was clear that anyone who arrived after me was disrupting class by causing me to lose my train of thought, which I invariably pointed out.

The most important thing I know about teaching: never underestimate the level to which your students will fall if allowed to do so. This is the reason I am disgusted with the education system and, by extension, politically an anti-socialist.

 
Comment by Gadfly
2009-02-28 16:33:38

One of the good ones. Right arm!

 
Comment by hunkydory
2009-02-28 17:10:03

“WAman: The assignment is to write down what respect looks like from a teacher to a student, student to a teacher, and student to student. The next day they work in groups of 4 and make a poster and present their ideas to the class. Over the next few days I talk about respect on multiple occasions.”

What a great idea WAman! I can’t see how that plan could ever fail. The concetpual 3rd party between student & teacher goes from ’society’ to ’society’s critic’, and has them (and, just as importantly, you) focused instead on how respect works. It’s sets you apart as someone who’s not only capable of teaching something like that right, but would even SUGGEST such a thing!

Kudos to you and Paul in Florida. That’s the fix right under everyone’s nose: takes evolutionary ideas from smart teachers like you, and simply make them the new system. Heck, you could test it right where you teach, just have some peers of yours use your idea and see if it works. If it does, then everyone stick with it.

The better the teaching, the better the learning!! Not sure what the Latin is for that… “Sic wamanus paulus Floridus”!! :-)

 
Comment by WAman
2009-02-28 18:15:25

Thank you for your nice comments!

 
Comment by silverback1011
2009-03-01 05:43:10

I emailed WAman’s 1st day assignment for his students. I think it’s a great idea too.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Northeastener
2009-02-28 07:18:03

Is there anyone else in education that wants to rap with me today?

Well, if it makes you feel any better, my plan once I’ve made millions (chuckle) is to quit high-tech and business and become a teacher. Of course, in my idealized mind, I’ll be giving back to the community and helping to shape a generation of young adults…

The reality is that I probably won’t make millions, and if I do, the Fed will have inflated the value away and Congress will tax the rest into nothing. I’ll still end up teaching, but will have limited impact because of “No child left behind” style teaching-to-the-test.

Sometimes I wonder how I get up in the morning…

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 07:32:50

How Texas Destroyed US Education

We need a new Alcott.

Comment by skroodle
2009-02-28 10:40:08

We need Ross Perot to come back.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Jimbo
2009-02-28 08:36:10

Muggy, Got some chores to do today; so won’t be ’round for much rapping. I’m in education only part-time and do get discouraged more and more every semester by my student’s astounding ignorance. I am frequently criticized by students on My Professor Sucks-type sites (yes, I check them out) for constantly repeating myself in lectures. I plead guilty, though; I do. I must. Even then, the material seems to sink in and stick with only about half-dozen of 35 to 40 students I get a semester. Is it I? I like to think not. I employ the same techniques used by the teachers from whom I really learned over the years. I’m no Einstein, and these techniques worked with me. Why don’t they work with today’s students? I don’t know. Maybe I need more “bells and whistles,” Power Points, etc. to arouse their enthusiasm.

One recent exchange seems to capture many students’ attitudes and the prevailing “Challenge Authority” atmosphere hanging over schools. I’d gone over half-dozen times one point concerning federalism and states’ rights. I did so because it was something on which they were going to be tested. After I moved on, one student brought me back to the topic with a question about it; so, I went over it again, very slowly, but not condescendingly. Asked if that answered her question, the student responded– with muffled agreement and encouragement from a few others– “Them’s jes’ words. Jes’ words. You jes’ be talking words.”

Oh, boy. Maybe I should find another side-line of work. God, help us.

Comment by WAman
2009-02-28 09:14:14

So you have been teaching the way you were taught and you don’t know why it does not work? You have to know that the world has changed tremendously over the past 20 years. Now tell me is it easier for you to change or 35 - 40 students. If you do not change you will NEVER be 100% successful!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jimbo
2009-02-28 10:12:00

WaMan: Between me and my wife, we have five boys, er– young men between 19 and 26. I know very well how much the world has changed, and, of course, some course content changes to keep things relevant. But I believe there are some fundamental, time-tested teaching techniques on which not many improvements really can be made. To take an extreme example, having students actually read some work or document before they express an opinion on it. My students seem to have been rewarded in the past for saying whatever they think about this or that, and they are a little taken aback when I tell them I’m not going to entertain any opinions on a topic until they do the hard work of reading up on it. They are all eager passionately to express their opinions in a “break-out session”; but, alas, they do not know what they don’t know. It’s the roughly half-dozen to whom I get through every semester that keep me in the game.

 
 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 09:28:03

You were talking about the Constitution and the student say “them’s jes’ words” and you’re surprised?

Where have you been the last twenty years?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Jimbo
2009-02-28 12:20:30

Not surprised, Gator, just discouraged.

 
Comment by Gadfly
2009-02-28 16:39:16

After all, didn’t The Decider say it was “just a goddamm piece of paper?” Stuff rolls downhill.

 
 
Comment by Cassandra
2009-02-28 09:48:20

I taught for many years. Mostly I taught community college, but also some high school. I taught in “disadvantaged” communities most of the time, and rarely had a good student. I could deal with the students, even the HS kids that came to class drunk or stoned.

What I couldn’t deal with was the incredibly stupid and arrogant administrators. I ended up in the superintendent of schools’ office on more than one occasion my first semester teaching HS. For readers here not in education, you may not be aware that this is a very unusual event.

So I quit teaching. Not because I couldn’t do it, actually it was easy. Not because I couldn’t handle the kids. I quit to prevent a homicide in the administrative offices, and the likely consequences there of.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 11:39:28

My experience with public school admin is that they are the worst of the worst… and those that aren’t get punished by the parents for it.

Definitely an environment where kissing the right *sses and playing political hardball gets you ahead; improving education, giving a fig about students, and generally being a good person will get you pushed out.

 
Comment by WAman
2009-02-28 18:19:04

Casandra it is you that has to take control of the classroom. Not the principal or any other administrator. If you cannot control a classroom then teaching is not for you.

 
 
 
Comment by drumminj
2009-02-28 10:08:02

Northeasterner - One thing you can do now (w/o quitting high-tech) is to volunteer with the FIRST program…FIRST robotics or FIRST Lego League…a good way to give back and help get kids excited in tech, math, and science…

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 07:41:36

Muggy,

Not sure of your situation, but my sister used to be a high school math teacher. She was going bonkers with frustration, and I gently persuaded her to move on to community college teaching (she had a master’s degree which made this transition easy from the credential standpoint). She has been much happier ever since making the move.

 
Comment by Little Al
2009-02-28 07:47:59

What has been so humorous for me as an educator is how financially illiterate 90% of educators are, but in dissecting it, it becomes quite logical. Educators are very positive, very social, type A personalities, and trending on the slow side for professionals. Thus, they get most easily caught in the MSM claptrap.

My principal discussed how next year we will lose 4 teachers in a school of 66, lose all aides, take a 4% cut, and clean our own rooms next year.

 
Comment by AK-LA
2009-02-28 09:11:44

I think I have a similar story. I taught high school at a Title 1 school. I loved the kids, but hated the parents and the system that threw them away. I believed in the job, but I didn’t have what it takes to fight for those kids every day.

I decided a wanted a career doing what I really love - being out in the woods, hiking around. I’m now in my third year of graduate school. This morning I’m on my way to the woods to hike around. It’s “work”. I miss the kids, but I don’t regret leaving education, not for a minute.

Comment by Muggy
2009-02-28 10:05:42

Whoa, thanks for all the comments. I am not a first-year teacher and I’ve never had behavior issues. I’m actually one of the more skilled in my district at dealing with, and fixing chaos, which is why I don’t really worry about job security — I just worry about buying a damn, affordable house. I don’t hate the kids at all, and I dealt with the worst of the worse, by choice. I love hose kids. This is why I always hated Alad’s posts. He would go on and on about “people.” It was insulting if you’re actually trying to build people up. Some of my students are dead now.

I switched jobs to be able to work at home. I am still in education, but I am not removed from the bureaucracy. I just get nervous about the future of education — I definitely need to get out of Florida. Maybe staying in education, but getting out of Florida is the answer. I spent an hour at my state rep’s office yesterday discussing all of this, and it ain’t pretty.

It drives me bat$hit that the first thing they cut is education. It’s the ultimate bitchslap to a forewarned bubblesitter.

Comment by Muggy
2009-02-28 10:08:29

And if I hear one more retired boomer say “why should I pay school taxes” I will be arrested for dancing the Swan Lake on his face.

A fistula, if you will :smile:

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-28 10:54:48

LOL, Muggy. There I was a couple weeks ago suggesting you get into education as a result of the stimulus package and you are knee deep in it. What gives? Does it not help as much as billed? BTW, I’m in Jax. Are you down in Naples?

 
Comment by kirisdad
2009-02-28 10:58:50

Muggy, I have two sisters that teach in FL. The salaries are outrageously bad and it’s no wonder you were priced out of buying a house.

 
Comment by Muggy
2009-02-28 14:05:26

“There I was a couple weeks ago suggesting you get into education as a result of the stimulus package and you are knee deep in it. What gives? Does it not help as much as billed? BTW, I’m in Jax. Are you down in Naples?”

Naw, it doesn’t really help long-term, it just lesson the short and medium-term blow. I am in the Clearwater area.

“it’s no wonder you were priced out of buying a house.”

Yup, but we wouldn’t be priced out of a house at, say, 2001 levels. I am content with a 1,500 sqft 3/2. We spend most of our time outside anyways. After 9/11 I thought I had it all figured out: be in education, use the free time for arts and hiking… chillin’ with my family.

I dunno, sorry if I am not my usual ZING! self, but I’m feeling a little blue today. :frown:

 
Comment by Muggy
2009-03-01 07:13:29

lessons = lessens

Lol…

 
 
Comment by drumminj
2009-02-28 10:15:47

While I’m not in education, Muggy, I think there’s a lot to be said for trying out a different environment.

I’m a software “engineer”, and was looking to totally get out of the industry - considering law school among other things. I just couldn’t take it anymore, couldn’t see myself wanting to do software for another 10 years, let alone 30…I’m good at what I do, but just wasn’t getting any enjoyment out of it anymore.

Then I got a new job…

Made a huge difference. I think I still want to do something different long term, but the change of environment - coworkers, managers, technologies, etc - made a huge difference in my happiness.

I think this very well could be true with all types of jobs. Before “giving up” on the industry or type of job, at least try a different environment and see if maybe that’s what was souring you on it, rather than the career in general. Would you enjoy things more if you weren’t always battling bureaucracy, or felt that your job/profession was valued more?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by skroodle
2009-02-28 10:59:38

I second that - a change of scenery and co-workers can make a world of difference. Sometimes you don’t realize how far things have deteriorated until you are out of the environment.

 
Comment by GH
2009-02-28 11:06:13

I have been going through the same thing. At one point, we were hired to write software that solved real problems and given sufficient respect and included in the estimages of time to complete the task and complete it well. Don’t get me wrong I am fast, experienced and accurate, but when tasks were suddenly estimated by managers who knew nothing of the real problems that needed to be addressed and I was told I had 5 hours and 18 minutes to complete a task I would tell them this was a 16 hour task - I could complete it in 12 … No there is only 5 hours and 18 minutes … UGG.
Really, apart from my own projects I don’t care if I never write another line of code.

 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-02-28 11:31:23

My two cents.

End public education. End mandatory school attendance. Most importantly, end the regimentation.

Let parents who want their kids to get an education pay directly for the kids’ schooling. And of course let them choose the proper school for each. Some kids would be ready to start when they are 5 years old. Others might not start their education until they hit 20.

But why attend any physical school at all? We have the internet.

No problem requesting a do-over. Just pay the tuition and take the course again, perhaps from an entity that uses a different teaching method (we all learn differently).

Would things be any worse than they are now? How would they be worse?

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 11:48:03

Are you nuts?

Extra hands don’t go to work on the farm anymore, you know.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-28 12:41:17

‘Let parents who want their kids to get an education pay directly for the kids’ schooling. And of course let them choose the proper school for each.’

Sigh. I recall when last you promulgated this utter-nutter idea. And I asked then, Bill, and I ask again now, Bill:
What about the children who get born, through no fault of their own, to (for example) religious fundamentalist whack-job parents who can’t even manage their OWN lives effectively, and who don’t give a crap if their kids gain the tools to function effectively in the world and/or realize their potential or even learn how to freakin’ read and write, lessen’ it’s the Holy Scriptures? What about those kids, Bill? Just too dam*n bad for them, huh, Bill?

Oh, and btw, did you go to private schools, Bill? Or did you learn how to read and write, for I perceive that you do know how, from public school?

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-28 12:49:34

Oops, sorry, didn’t turn off the italics thingie.

 
Comment by tresho
2009-02-28 12:50:08

Extra hands don’t go to work on the farm anymore, you know. They may be forced to when motor fuel rationing begins. They may have to move back to the farm, for that matter. On foot.

 
Comment by Janet Rocha
2009-02-28 12:57:18

Totally agree. People only value education,health etc. If they have to pay for it directly. That is why I hate socialism.

 
Comment by tresho
2009-02-28 13:01:53

My sister taught me to read the summer between 1st & 2nd grade. We sat side by side on the back porch & she read comic books to me, then graduated me to reading cool stuff like “Voyage to the Mushroom Planet” By 3rd grade I was reading Ray Bradbury’s “The Fog Horn” I learned about Virtual Reality in his story “The Veldt” in 1955. By then my sister had read all the books in the kid’s section of the local library & the librarians wouldn’t let her into the grown-up’s section. Other kids that I knew in town needed some prodding, others needed guidance, others needed protection, some needed to be sent into foster care. YMMV.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-28 13:52:01

Lucky Tresho. Your sister sounds AWESOME.
Plus, she has wonderful taste in literature, obviously.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-28 17:10:27

tresho,

Mom introduced me to sci-fi. Mom was introduced to sci-fi by a librarian at her local public library.

The “Veldt” by Bradbury was ahead of its time.

 
Comment by skroodle
2009-02-28 17:11:58

What about the children who get born, through no fault of their own, to (for example) religious fundamentalist whack-job parents who can’t even manage their OWN lives effectively, and who don’t give a crap if their kids gain the tools to function effectively in the world and/or realize their potential or even learn how to freakin’ read and write, lessen’ it’s the Holy Scriptures? What about those kids, Bill? Just too dam*n bad for them, huh, Bill?

To be fair Oly, the Supreme Court has upheld the Amish right to only allow children to be educated through the 6th grade.

In Dallas, if parents had to pay anything for schooling, 1/2 the schools would be empty and 1/2 school age kids in the city would only speak Spanish.

 
 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 11:41:12

You’re in Dixie. They don’t value education. Why value education when education will just make the minions restless? No, keep ‘em ignorant and distract ‘em with false demons and false promises.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-02-28 12:34:20

So, regimentation is the goal. Kids must be forced to learn, and learn at the gubmint’s pace, not theirs.

 
Comment by Silverback1011
2009-02-28 13:21:07

They have to be forced to learn, or at least be forced to exposed to something besides “Pimp My Ride” and “Cribs of the Temporarily Rich and Famous,” yes. I am very sympathetic towards the 7th grader my daughter had this year who was living with his grandma because BOTH his parents were in jail. Geeze. He had hostility problems. I would too. Her students keep stopping her in the hall and asking her, ” Ms. So-and-So, when you coming back ? ” My father spent 42 years in the Detroit Public School system before retiring as the admin of the adult education program, which was second in size only to New York’s when he retired. They had a fantastic graduation rate and very thorough job-training programs, too. Now ? Well….he too has echoed the “challenge authority” ethos the kids seem to come in with nowadays, even though they can hardly string two words together in a decent sentence. That being said, daughter has it in her blood (fourth generation teacher), and I can tell from the way she handles many situations and students that she’s going to keep on keeping on. Heck, her great-aunt is still subbing at the age of 76. That’s how she pays for the trips abroad that she & my undle love to take. But getting started is hard.

Muggy, I think you’re too good at what you do to ever walk away completely. I figured out early in life that my daughter is not a cubicle person. You probably aren’t either. Maybe a better school district in a different state would be a wonderful change for you. I couldn’t begin what beginning teachers make in my daughter’s state make. With your experience you’d be making a lot more.

 
Comment by exeter
2009-02-28 14:57:39

“Kids must be forced to learn, and learn at the gubmint’s pace, not theirs.”

Yeah… why bother having education standards. Who needs them? Thats right…. we need a country full of illiterates. /sarcasm

Sounds like a authoritarians dream date.

 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-02-28 15:09:29

Oly, many of your posts on this site lead me to believe you’re a free spirit. Did you actually enjoy sitting at your desk in row 3, or was it row 4, while the teacher tried to help some of the other 30 or so kids read what you already knew how to read, or do a math problem you could already solve? Did you find the study of different types of rocks to be boring because you were more interested in living creatures (or vice-versa)? Did you enjoy getting into line to march to the lunch room and board the school bus?

Ons-size-fits-all only worked when we needed lots of mindless worker bees for our factories. The system we have today (you go to this building on these days between these hours and do these tasks) is an ugly leftover from that long-gone era.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2009-02-28 17:17:56

Society (and life itself) requires rules. Don’t like it? Too bad.

To be fair, too much regimentation is a bad thing. Not enough is also bad.

But until you can at least spell discretion, you must follow the rules.

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 19:09:12

Can’t answer for Oly, but when I was champing at the bit in 2nd grade, my very old-school teacher Mr. Utka had extra assignments available and when I had exhausted those, he sent me (as he had sent other students before me) into the 3rd grade classroom to audit whatever they were learning. You don’t have to bore the smart kids.

My worst year in school was 4th grade. The teacher (who was a real ‘winner’, I say this sarcastically) was going through a divorce and spent mucho time away from the classroom having girl chats with the principal. She was absolutely horrible: knew nothing, taught nothing, although she was up on whatever new fancy stuff was in the air. I remember we had “discussion groups” which was utter inanity because a 4th grader can only parrot what they heard at home. She couldn’t even figure out what curriculum to present to us, skipping whole sections of maths while running over the 5th grade history (and presumably skipping the 4th grade social studies). Oh, and there was the one time she decided to read us a story and it turned out to be a Catholic folk tale involving the Virgin Mary chastising a child and turning her finger into a carrot, or something, I don’t really remember. Even she knew she messed up on that one.

I went to school to learn. Sure, I may have fallen out of a lot of student desks because I couldn’t sit still in them, but I was very grateful for the education (and to be out of the house with my crazy mother!!!).

 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-02-28 19:38:03

I invite all of you to read the Wikipedia article on “Compulsory Education.” I side with the critics that are mentioned in the article, especially Illich and O’Keeffe.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2009-02-28 06:56:47

BOA will be back at the hand out window shortly…

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Bank of America Corp (BAC.N) is carrying loans on its balance sheet marked at more than $44 billion above their fair value, the company said in its annual report filed with U.S. regulators on Friday.

The bank said it ended 2008 with $886.2 billion in loans, but estimated the fair value — or market price — for these loans as $841.6 billion.

The bank intends to hold these loans to maturity, not for sale, said spokesman Scott Silvestri, explaining why the loans are marked above market value.

The report showed the bank struggled throughout the year as losses on consumer debt including mortgages, home equity and credit cards piled up.

Falling home prices prompted the bank to modify more than 230,000 mortgages in 2008 to help homeowners stay in their homes — but the value of these mortgages has continued to fall.

Along with losses from mortgages and other consumer loans, the bank said it holds $6.45 billion in impaired commercial loans, up from $2.14 billion at the end of 2007, according to the report.

Separately, Bank of America’s investment bank lost more than $10 million on one in every four trading days in 2008.

The Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank has reported write-downs and credit losses of more than $60 billion since the credit crisis began in the middle of 2007.

Comment by palmetto
2009-02-28 07:10:21

Let BofA die an ugly death, puh-leeeze! Bring in the FDIC, replace the management, sell off the pieces. It’d be like removing a tumor from the US financial system. Although the cancer has metastasized.

Comment by palmetto
2009-02-28 07:20:39

Jeebus, I so sick of these zombie banks, it’s like the whole Terry Schiavo thing. Will they or will they not disconnect the feeding tube?

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 07:26:30

I give you Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Countryside as cases in point. But they cannot disconnect all feeding tubes at once — the undertaker would be overwhelmed with the spike in business.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by rms
2009-02-28 16:19:59

“…the undertaker would be overwhelmed with the spike in business.”

The president can authorize a mass grave; the undertaker would be a heavy equipment operator. :)

 
Comment by ryan in tampa
2009-03-01 02:17:43

Burn the bodies to stem the spread of the contagion any further.

 
 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2009-02-28 16:16:49

What is the benefit of feeding copious amounts of taxpayer cash to monstrous insolvent banks rather than dismantling them, allowing smaller, healthier institutions to manage their assets?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 07:34:21

Just a hunch (not a prediction):

By the time we are out of the woods on this episode, many financial institutions which were regarded as “too-big-to-fail” will have failed. I see growing veiled hints that the Obama economics team has caught on to the fact that the “too-big-to-fail” model of firm rescue is a recipe for eventual complete failure of the national U.S. economy. Corporate managers are mammals, and mammals habituate to their environments. If the regulatory environment tells firms that by growing to massive size, they automatically get free government-provided downside risk protection, then firms will struggle to grow to massive size and game their investment strategies to make outsized profits in the boom years and to blow up and dump their losses on the taxpayer in the bust years. This is not a sustainable model for long term growth and health of the U.S. free enterprise economic system.

But the PTB cannot let all these firms fail en masse, without creating the potential for systemic collapse.

Comment by palmetto
2009-02-28 09:14:42

Obama economics team. Feh. It’s almost an oxymoron, although I’m hoping against hope you are right that they’ve caught on to the “too big to fail” scam. At various points in history, entities that were “too big to fail”, did eventually fail and are no longer around today. I mean, who wants to be a citizen of the Roman empire anymore? Who is concerned about Roman centurions descending on your villlage? Where’s the South Seas Company these days? How about the USSR?

Comment by laughing boy
2009-02-28 10:26:12

“Who is concerned about Roman centurions descending on your villlage?”

You mean these guys?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPGb4STRfKw&feature=related

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 11:26:56

The examples you cite should all serve as cautionary tales for the Obama economics team. I believe we are at a crossroads in our nation’s history where we can either choose to bite the bullet and retool our economy to become productive again (including allowing certain too-big-to-bail entities to leave the scene) or to continue on the unsustainable path down which we are currently sliding, which could lead to our untimely demise. The apple is there to be picked, and an optimistic reading of Obama’s speech last week is that constructive change is underway.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by tresho
2009-02-28 13:08:32

which could lead to our untimely demise. This sounds like Woody Allen’s famous dilemma.

 
 
 
Comment by Blano
2009-02-28 10:33:55

If you’re right, do you think they’ll keep bailing out GM??

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-02-28 11:36:17

IMO, yes. There are too many union jobs at stake. And this will be the “vehicle” for providing the next entitlement- a car for everyone, with price based on ability to pay.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by rms
2009-02-28 20:58:14

Okay, I’ll take my Lada in flat black!

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by cobaltblue
2009-02-28 07:04:14

Again, and just to underscore the realities of the current siuation, look at how unemployment is currently calculated. If you have been continuously iunemployed for more than a year,
YOU ARE NO LONGER COUNTED. They are said to be “discouraged workers”.
Does that make sense to anyone here? This is like saying that the people who have less than $1.00 to their name are no longer poor, they are just “economically discouraged”.
Again, and just to underscore the current situation, calculate the unemployment rate to INCLUDE people who have been unemployed for over a year, the way it was 25 years ago, and guess what? National unemployment is now at about 18% - in that terrritory known as DEPRESSION land.
And it will probably DOUBLE from here within two years. Americans have been fed pure BS for so long, they think it is a tasty food group.

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 08:24:25

Awesome last line… Yes, there was much griping about this during the last recession (early 1990’s). Economists blathered about how the layoffs were “rational” and made silly claims about how people were being absorbed back into the workforce quickly and efficiently … but of course, economists were not being laid off. (It was scientists, engineers, and quite a few middle managers who’d been coasting for years and didn’t have a clue how to “reposition themselves in the global marketplace”–so no wonder many of them were out of work for 18mos and then had to take a job at much lower pay!)

Comment by In Montana
2009-02-28 19:45:13

sounds like my brother, bless his heart. He made up his mind to spend more time with his kids and not be like our father, not take money and career so seriously. Laid off in ‘91 and never really worked again. Dad ended up supporting him and his kids and my other brother.

 
 
Comment by matthew
2009-02-28 08:36:49

Very good point.. it bothers me greatly that the measures and models that our government uses to report on the status of our economy (and, by extension, themselves I guess) are seriously flawed and very very misleading… unemployment being one… CPI being another… nabtional debt and deficit being a third and fourth… all significantly flawed models and corresponding numbers, which lulls the American public into believing all is well… I’m flabergasted really by how the CPI is computed and used by the Fed… those “economists” need to close their text books, ignore their think tank bretheren and walk the streets and neighborhoods a bit more to see how unbelievably out of control inflation was over the past 10 years before this thing burst…

 
Comment by WAman
2009-02-28 08:39:02

How do you arrive at that 18% number?

Comment by Terry
2009-02-28 09:20:38

In looking at the unemployment figures, has the government counted:
1. Real estate associates, that are no longer working.
2. Mortgage broker associates, no longer working.
3. Food service, housekeeping, maids, bus boys, dishwashers, cooks, waiters, wait staff, all people that are considered part time.
4.garage mechanics, that work for dealers, renting their spots and being paid on commission.
5. Automobile sales associates.
6. Small business owners, that went out of business.
if the government counted all of the people out of work as of today, the unemployment number would be in the neighborhood of 30%. Beleive it or not, we are in a severe depression.
The government has such a unique way of lying!

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 09:32:29

Interesting comment about 3–the Right to Work (for less) state governors are refusing federal aid for unemployment for these workers. (Of course he is taking the “road money.”) One said he wouldn’t pay for those who “don’t want to work.” Knowing this population, he is flat wrong. Their employers keep their hours down so they can pay them less, and they often maintain control by changing their hours frequently, making taking a second job near impossible.

Still the same in the solid south, no bread crumbs for po’ folks, but keep the gravy flowing for the big dogs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by in Colorado
2009-02-28 10:49:14

And some on this blog predict violence in the streets. Ain’t gonna happen. Americans are wusses and have been whipped. If we had any collective spine left there would be mass demonstrations.

Where I work we had a minor profit hiccup. The firm is still unbelievably profitable. Yet they just cut or wages and benefits (but only in the US). The only sound heard was a big collective “thank you”.

 
Comment by polly
2009-02-28 13:12:55

previous results are no guarantee of future returns….

 
Comment by Gadfly
2009-02-28 16:58:52

God! Reading this blog is like inhaling pure O2 after living in a PortaPotty.

[Nothing to add to the thread--just a moment of elation . . . ;-)]

 
Comment by ecofeco
2009-02-28 17:25:22

Even pussycats turn into tigers if they get hungrrrry enough.

 
Comment by In Montana
2009-02-28 19:47:52

Lots of guys I knew in music and the building trades went into trucking and it turned out to be a pretty good escape hatch for a lot of other displaced workers to.

I wonder how that’s all working out now.

 
Comment by In Montana
2009-02-28 19:49:21

…that’s workers too.

 
 
Comment by WAman
2009-02-28 18:33:57

But how did you count those individual job losses? How could anyone? So how did you arrive at 18%? Looking at what you just wrote one could say it was 25% or 13% Who really knows?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by trapped in houston
2009-02-28 21:22:06

a fabulous site to look at for analysis of the Bureau of Labor Statistics BLS, is at shadowstats dot com. Look at the alternate data series on that site. Unemployment measured the “old” way is about 18%.

scary.

 
Comment by WHYoung
2009-03-01 07:30:48

I’m pretty sure the guy from the outplacement firm Challenger, Grey & Christmas has been saying the real unemployment rate is significantly higher than stated for years.
Besides those who run out of unemployment the stats
don’t count all those “discouraged workers” who go on SS disability. If you watch some daytome or late night TV you’ll see ads for law firms that specialize in getting people SS Disability. A new cottage industry i think.
Had a cousin (mid-50’s) go that route after being laid off.
Health had not changed that much, the job market had

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by cobaltblue
2009-02-28 07:20:03

Another thought for today, or,
Why Socialism Doesn’t Work:

“You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.”

Comment by jeff saturday
2009-02-28 07:28:54

bruce wilson

“as a canadian watching the obombanatics fiasco it amazes me that the media still spins everything in favor of this mony python circus. in canada in the 70,s, ontario was the most properous province in canada, then new democrates got elected for the first time. they had the exact platform of obama, tax the rich,enact exorbent social programmes, after 2 years they were astonished that there was no money and ontario was near bankrupt. what they did not realize was that anyone making over 200,000 has an advisor and tax accountants who found all kinds of legal loopholes to counter the tax increases. after realizing this the only one they could tax was the middle class lunch bucket worker who lives pay check to paycheck and who has no money nor no place to hide his money through tax shelters. so thier only option was to hit them.on thier paycheck, increase taxes on gas ,licenses,property taxes ,anything and all. they were thrown out of power the next election. usa beware “

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-02-28 09:42:21

Atlas always shrugs in those situations. Businesses will either raise prices and pass them to the consumer or they will offset tax costs by laying off more employees.

Individuals who are p.o.’d like myself at socialists will not incur capital gains for the duration of a commie’s term and the duration of his new tax laws.

I’m fiercely and consientiously fighting this new administration and the theftocrapic Congress. In fact close to half my income is legally not included in my AGI. I am doing this legally through the IRS’s own regulations (forms and publications).

Liberty and Freedom for all! This is a revolution!

 
Comment by measton
2009-02-28 11:42:27

Jeff says ” as a canadian watching the obombanatics fiasco it amazes me that the media still spins everything in favor of this mony python circus. in canada in the 70,s, ontario was the most properous province in canada, then new democrates got elected for the first time. they had the exact platform of obama, tax the rich,enact exorbent social programmes, after 2 years they were astonished that there was no money and ontario was near bankrupt.

Jeff the US story is a bit different.
In 2001 the US was the most prosperous country in the world. Then the GOP grabbed control of all 3 branches of government. They had the exact opposite platform of tax breaks for the elite, slashing regulation, and reduced spending on the middle class. After 8 years they were astonished to find that the country was near bankrupt.

J says
“what they did not realize was that anyone making over 200,000 has an advisor and tax accountants who found all kinds of legal loopholes to counter the tax increases. after realizing this the only one they could tax was the middle class lunch bucket worker who lives pay check to paycheck and who has no money nor no place to hide his money through tax shelters.

Jeff the story in the US is a bit different
In the last 8 years the top 0.1% has seen their effective tax rate slashed. Warren Buffet paid 18% effective tax rate, and those Hedge Fund managers paid even less. Most of us are in the 25% and up range I imagine. This doesn’t even include state taxes which are more regressive. The US slashed payments to the states which then increased fees and sales taxes to make up the difference. The elite already hide their income here. What I’ve seen so far from Obama is cutting taxes on the middle class and increasing them on the wealthy. Hopefully we are finally starting to realize that the economy needs a middle class and so does democracy.

Jeff says
so thier only option was to hit them.on thier paycheck, increase taxes on gas ,licenses,property taxes ,anything and all. they were thrown out of power the next election. usa beware

Well like I said earlier taxes/expenses were pushed onto the middle class over the last 8 years. It is the GOP that was thrown out of power. It looks to me like Obama plans on reversing this trend.

Comment by jsocal
2009-02-28 14:54:04

measton has an interesting revisionist history:

2001 US was in a recession

“NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - The committee of economists that sets the dates of U.S. recessions and expansions is considering moving the starting point of the latest recession to as early as November 2000 (back from march 2001)”

http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/22/news/economy/nber/index.htm

Tax breaks/credits (to use Obamaspeak) were across the board including people who didn’t pay taxes, and middle class spending increased.

“From the massive increases in agricultural subsidies in the farm bill of 2002, to the new Medicare prescription drug entitlement of 2003; from the 47% increase in the defense budget, to the 80% increase in education spending, George W. Bush has demonstrated that “limited government” is not part of his political vocabulary.”

http://www.independent.org/newsroom/news_detail.asp?newsID=31

Exactly what regulations were slashed?

Lastly, the GOP held control of congress for the last 6, not 8, years.

Get the facts straight please.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2009-02-28 20:31:34

“Jeff says”
jeff didn`t say any of that, a Canadian named bruce wison did. jeff has lived his entire life in the United States, jeff gettin upset.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by yogurt
2009-02-28 11:49:46

then new democrates got elected for the first time. they had the exact platform of obama, tax the rich,enact exorbent social programmes, after 2 years they were astonished that there was no money and ontario was near bankrupt

Oh come on off it. One, Canada’s New Democrats are nowhere near Obama politically. It’s like a whole party made up of Bernie Sanders and Dennis Kucinich. For example, the New Democrats are in favor of an immediate withdrawl from Afghanistan. In Canada Obama would likely be considered on the right wing of the Liberal Party - for example almost all Liberals are in favor of gay marriage and Obama isn’t - and in fact some of his policies are to the right of the Conservatives. For example, all parties in Canada, including the Conservatives, are in favor of universal government health care and Obama isn’t.

Also you’re giving the impression that the New Democrats in Ontario were elected at the end of the 70’s, when in fact they were elected in 1990 right before a major recession which also hit many US states hard.

Comment by kirisdad
2009-02-28 16:23:59

So the only things on the liberal agenda that Obama is against are gay marriage and universal healthcare? Great… those are the only two that I’m for.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 07:37:45

Assertion without proof.

Looking at the historical record, it looks like wealth distribution –> large middle class –> economic growth

wealth concentration –> large underclass –> economic stagnation

G7 nations versus Latin America. Who has the stronger economy?

ps: by wealth distribution I am not talking about Mexican/Zimbabwe model, eg land distro “by the gun”, although stealing land from native peoples and redistributing to anglos does seem to have worked quite nicely in Ireland, America, and Zimbabwe from an economic pov. taken by force from weak: takers get rich; taken by force from strong: disaster. I mean, look at France: basket case.

 
Comment by Polly
2009-02-28 08:07:48

Maybe not, but you sure do goose the economy when you shift money from people who save 20 to 80% of their income to people who spend 100% of it.

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 08:26:20

Black humor: the new black?

 
Comment by rms
2009-02-28 21:15:10

“Maybe not, but you sure do goose the economy when you shift money from people who save 20 to 80% of their income to people who spend 100% of it.”

…to people who spend 125% of it.

 
 
 
Comment by cobaltblue
2009-02-28 07:30:41

My New Proposed Immigration Laws: Read to the bottom or you will miss the message…

1. There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools.

2. All ballots will be in this nation’s language.

3.. All government business will be conducted in our language.

4. Non-residents will NOT have the right to vote no matter how long they are here.

5. Non-citizens will NEVER be able to hold political office.

6 Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare, no food stamps, no health care, or other government assistance programs. Any burden will be deported.

7. Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount at least equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.

8. If foreigners come here and buy land… Options will be restricted. Certain parcels including waterfront property are reserved for citizens naturally born into this country.

9.. Foreigners may have no protests; no demonstrations, no waving of a foreign flag, no political organizing, no bad-mouthing our president or his policies. These will lead to deportation.

10. If you do come to this country illegally, you will be actively hunted, and when caught, sent to jail until your deportation can be arranged. All assets will be taken from you.

Do you think these are too strict, or “racist” ?……

The above laws are the current immigration laws of Mexico!

Comment by In Montana
2009-02-28 08:14:36

link?

Comment by in Colorado
2009-02-28 13:28:23

As someone who lived 12 years in Mexico I can attest that the above is true and correct.

Comment by In Montana
2009-02-28 19:52:37

works for me.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by WAman
2009-02-28 08:42:09

4. Non-residents will NOT have the right to vote no matter how long they are here.

So where do these non-residents vote now?

Comment by kirisdad
2009-02-28 10:34:41

Obviously, you didn’t follow the instructions and read the whole post.

 
Comment by polly
2009-02-28 11:43:49

Non-residents not being able to vote sounds like no absentee ballots until you get to the phrase “no matter how long they are here.” If they are *here* then they are residents. They may not be permanent residents and certainly may not be citizens, but there are residents.

If someone wanted people to make people think they were talking about the US in this matter, then they should have translated it to US legal lingo for non-residents, resident aliens, permanent residents and citizens. The whole thing is stupid.

 
Comment by yogurt
2009-02-28 11:57:59

Points 1 through 5 are also the law in Canada, but do note that in Canada LEGAL immigrants can become citizens in 3 years. Canada admits large numbers of legal immigrants, but has very few illegal immigrants.

 
 
Comment by what-me-worry?
2009-02-28 08:42:40

This list is all over the Internet. It’s not verifiable. There’s no question that Mexico’s immigration policy and laws are much tougher than those of the U.S. And even if the above list is not perfectly accurate, it’s not far from the reality. The last time I got heavily involved in immigration laws research was about five years ago. One thing I remember finding was that Mexico’s high tech voter identification card was produced by an American company in the U.S. and sold to the Mexican government. I think the company was located in Oklahoma. I no longer remember, and I no longer am motivated to research that stuff again. I think it was SSI Technologies, based in Edmond, OK.

 
Comment by hwy50ina49dodge
2009-02-28 10:31:07

8. If foreigners come here and buy land… Options will be restricted. Certain parcels including waterfront property are reserved for citizens naturally born into this country. ;-)

Oh darn, that’s been something I’ve always wanted to do my whole life…buy land in Mexico. ;-) (Hwy still humming… America the beautiful)

 
 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 07:30:44

Blog gods not with me. GNV News in three parts.

Comment by hip in zilker
2009-02-28 11:07:09

Read GNV News (long post above) in appalled fascination. Structure that up and fill it out with the behind-the-scenes-dealings and you’ve got material for a novel there - a corpse to start with and enough crooked characters and deals at city hall to keep the reader in suspense.

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 11:51:48

Somebody call Hiaasen. *ggg*

 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-02-28 07:35:16

Our community of about 1,800 residents (mostly retirees) publishes a monthly newspaper. Each issue includes a listing of community directory updates: move-ins, change of phone number, occasional change of address within the community. For the last nine months or so there were no more than two move-ins each month and in some months there were zero.

February 2009 had seven move-ins, which was a typical monthly number during 2005 and 2006. I know one month does not make a trend, but this will bear watching.

Comment by AK-LA
2009-02-28 09:15:56

Could be a selection effect - people forced into early retirement, maybe?

 
 
Comment by AnonyRuss
2009-02-28 07:41:58

Another interesting article on Housing Bubble/Bust Poster Child Maricopa, Arizona:

“Builders rushed into this one-time agricultural crossroads during the housing boom. They put up beige stucco houses on winding streets, with names like Heavenly Place and Good Vibrations Lane. They lured young people who couldn’t afford homes in nearby Phoenix or its costly suburbs. The population soared to 37,000 last year from 1,400 a decade ago, making Maricopa one of the nation’s fastest-growing towns.
Now, it’s become a dead end for some of those people.
‘We’re trapped,’ says Tracy Campbell, as she watches her 2-year-old daughter romp on a playground.”

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123543721679054667.html

Comment by mikey
2009-02-28 08:29:48

‘Mr. Price, a financial adviser with an office in Phoenix, and his wife, Cindy, a photographer, liked the small-town feel. They paid about $180,000 for a four-bedroom home in early 2005. By late 2006, Mr. Price figures, the value had rocketed to about $270,000 amid a “frenzy” of speculation. Now, with foreclosure sales dragging down values, he thinks the home would sell for only around $50,000′

Hummm…even MONKEYS fall out of the MONEY TREES..as do finacial planners and RE agents :)

 
Comment by AnonyRuss
2009-02-28 08:53:01

Other Maricopa streets mentioned in the article:

“Lemon Drop Drive, which is near Jawbreaker Drive and Candyland Place.”

Which reminds me of:

Homer: “Oh, look at me! I’m making people happy! I’m the Magical Man from Happy-Land, in a gumdrop house on Lollipop Lane! Oh, by the way, I was being sarcastic.”

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 09:35:00

Why would anyone want to live on Jawbreaker? Out of context it sounds really bad. Reminds me of Old Sluice Road in PW County, VA.

And Candyland? Isn’t that slang for a whorehouse?

Comment by tresho
2009-02-28 13:14:32

Those Maricopa streets must have been where the Candy-Crappin’ Unicorn took a dump.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-02-28 13:17:50

Well I hope not. Candyland is a children’s board game.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-02-28 12:15:22

Mr. Price, who is president of the Meadows homeowner association, estimates that around one in eight of the 1,600 houses has been foreclosed, and several hundred of them are empty. He says lower-income people who previously couldn’t afford new homes now are buying them here for $50,000 to $100,000. It’s good that housing has become more affordable, Mr. Price says. Still, he says, “this is going to sound terrible, but it brings in a different caliber of people.”

‘A different caliber’ of people? What, like, the ‘non-stoopid’ kind of people?
Hahahaha! I think this’s very funny. This poor Price putz tryin’ to feel elite. Yeah, he’s ‘better’, because, see, he vastly overpaid for his house. So there!

And maybe it’s the excesses of the past week, but I just cannot come up with a limerick making use of his name. It’s the PERFECT name for an FB. Come on, someone with undazed neurons, help me out here.

Comment by sartre
2009-02-28 12:49:56

Yeah, I can relate to that. About to close on a place at 35% below 2007 pricing. The neighborhood is full of bankers and lawyers. And here I am –a lowly software engineer.

 
Comment by tresho
2009-02-28 13:15:54

Mr. Price is always “up”.

 
Comment by MrBubble
2009-02-28 14:26:58

There was a homeowner named Price
For money, he gave not a trice
“I’m better than you, can’t you see”
Then he sat on a Joshua Tree
Word is he that he thought that it fit in him really quite nice.

That last line is long, but I think that it scans.

MrBubble

 
Comment by MrBubble
2009-02-28 17:19:05

There was a homeowner named Price
For money, he gave not a trice
“I’m better than you, can’t you see”
Then he sat on a Joshua Tree
Word is he that he thought that it fit in him really quite nice.

MrBubble

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 07:52:06

Most ominously, the graph accompanying this article suggests the CA unemployment rate is increasing at the fastest rate in recent history, and at an increasing rate of increase (positive second derivative) to boot.

Question for those who know: Has the housing market ever before bottomed out when unemployment was over 10 percent? Because I have heard some bottom callers say housing will bottom out by late 2009, but I am pretty skeptical.

California’s jobless rate tops 10 percent
Some say situation might not improve until late next year
By Dean Calbreath
Union-Tribune Staff Writer
2:00 a.m. February 28, 2009

Rising job losses at retail stores, construction companies and movie studios helped push California’s unemployment rate above the 10 percent mark last month for the first time in 26 years, according to data released yesterday.

More than 1.8 million Californians were unemployed in January, compared with 1.1 million a year before, the state Employment Development Department reported. Economists say it could be late next year before the job market begins to improve.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 07:57:19

The CA unemployment graph shown in the SD Union-Tribune goes back to 1992. By contrast to the current episode, the CA unemployment rate ramped up more gradually and reached a peak of 9.9% in January 1993 before the fever broke. Then, as I recall, it took the housing market until 1996 or so to bottom out. This was accompanied by a more-or-less steady decline in the unemployment rate to a trough of 4.7% in February 2001 — shortly before the 9/11 terror attacks.

Similar timing this go-round would suggest no bottom in CA housing until 2009+3 = 2012, and possibly much later, depending on how long it takes the unemployment rate to peak and begin to decline.

 
Comment by matthew
2009-02-28 08:25:52

10% unemployment rate and probably 20% or more underemployment rate, but home prices stuck at 2003/2004 levels… not for long folks… not for long… round 2 price drops coming up… timberrrrrrrrrrr…

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-02-28 09:47:37

I am coming back to my opinion I had 3 years ago that I will be able to buy an ocean view house north of Santa Barbara for cash in 2012. I figure the official unemployment rate in California will reach 15% by then. The San Joaquin Valley communities will suffer at 20% unemployment rates.

 
 
 
Comment by AnonyRuss
2009-02-28 07:59:02

This was probably covered here, but I just noticed that the $8,000 tax credit for “first time” house buyers is a refundable credit. Obviously, there are income phase-outs and this will not reinflate the house price bubble, but any buyers will get the full amount even if they have zero tax liability. I believe that earlier proposals were larger and more broadly available, but were not refundable.

Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-28 09:46:42

True. If you qualify, the government is giving you money to buy a house.

HOWEVER, the current rate of home price declines in some areas more than offsets the 8,000 tax credit. It may work for you if you are buying in Maricopa or Ft. Myers, where prices are around 50K. However, the credit is reduced to 5K. It wouldn’t surprise me to see median prices move to 80K in those areas, as a result.

 
 
Comment by AnonyRuss
2009-02-28 08:05:48

Last night I watched Bill Maher’s program on HBO because it was on and it is sometimes funny. I believe that it was a new one. Maher can be a jerk, but it was nice to see him briefly get into the housing bubble/bust history. It is late in the game, but actually holding up Professor Shiller’s 100-year chart to the television cameras still earns points with me.

Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 08:29:11

Yeah, that was good of him. He’s really smart, but he’s a jerk, and way too obvious about it, which is why he will always be third-rate. I don’t think he’s ever understood that.

 
Comment by measton
2009-02-28 11:52:35

Maher can be a jerk. I think that’s his whole routine, but he says a lot of stuff that needs saying. He’s just not a smooth as George Carlin. Religulous is a perfect example.

Comment by exeter
2009-02-28 15:09:06

Maher takes the ugliest truths and makes them hilarious. That was definitely a good show last night.

 
Comment by Gadfly
2009-02-28 17:32:09

The fact that he’s on MSM makes him dubious. He tucked tail like a scalded dog when his short-lived 9/11 official conspiracy theory questions nearly made him extinct.

He’s an obedient poodle now spewing politically correct “dissent”. He’s the

 
 
 
Comment by matthew
2009-02-28 08:16:58

I’ll tell you a good use of taxpayer money…. produce and run a series of commercials that contradicts all the lies and greed in the RE, Mortgage and Banking industries… sort of like home finance 101… call it the “Get Out of Debt American” series…

Knock holes in everything you see on TV and junk mail from the sleezeballs in these industries… things like “Your banker can’t wait to lure you into debt up to your eyelids so he can reset your CC terms and profit from your misery, so don’t take out that credit card”.. or “Who cares how big the Jones’ house or car is, they’re scared sh–less right now”… or “Carlton Sheets, Donald Trump, Flip this House Guy and those other RE mogul schmoes you see on late night TV are all con men”… or “Set a personal example of restraint to your kids, unlike our government…” or “Don’t buy the hype and, sure as heck, don’t buy a house until prices come back down to earth”… or “What Really Happened in our Financial Markets”… or “The Real Housing Crisis Ended in 2007″… you get the idea..

Yes, given the cost of all the inaction that we see today, I’d say producing and running a series of commercials like the above would be money well spent… I bet if you put that to a referendum type vote to the American public, it would pass..

Comment by combotechie
2009-02-28 08:35:47

“… produce and run a series of commercials tha contradicts all the lies and greed in the RE, Mortgage and Banking industries … sort of like home finance 101 … call it the “Get Out Of Debt American” series.”

No need for paid commercials. The lessons are already being taught (and paid for) by a course called “Economic Reality 101″.

A new generation of Americans are about to be raised with values quite different from their spendrift parents (but with values aligned with our frugal grandparents.)

IMO.

Comment by matthew
2009-02-28 08:46:06

Disagree… believe the MSM is still too influenced by the money in those industries to really tell it like it is… even despite all the hell going on across the globe… debt still rules the day…

The majority of commercials on TV are geared towards the poor, down and downtrodden in our country… be it buying crap you don’t need to make you feel better, or weight loss, or pray to this god or that god to solve your life’s ills or buy this thing to spruce up your plain Jane wardrobe and life…

controlling the media and the message is key..

Comment by combotechie
2009-02-28 08:54:10

“… debt still rules the day…”

Billions of dollars of debt is currently being destroyed on a daily basis. It is cash that rules the day.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by matthew
2009-02-28 12:48:39

Cash rules the day for tomorrow’s middle class, but debt creating businesses and debt creating goverments rules the media, which is my point…. last I checked, we’re projecting a $1.75T dollar debt for FY09… those billions being wiped out evey day are baby poop..

 
 
 
 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 08:37:38

Have you seen those awful “Feed the Pig” ads encouraging saving?

They remind me of Lorillard’s “Anti-Smoking” campaign … intended to convey the opposite message.

Comment by matthew
2009-02-28 08:47:20

no, I haven’t.. I’ll keep an eye out for them or do a youtube search… thanks

 
 
Comment by Jimbo
2009-02-28 12:40:55

I can’t remember if it was on this site, but I believe I saw sometime this week a report out of Houston, TX, about using municipal taxes to fund a pool to be used to clean up the money troubles of prospective homebuyers so they could qualify for mortgages for their purchases. I think the rationale for the program was that use of tax monies was justified because everyone wins if we get these deadbeats into homes. I don’t know whether it was just a “trial balloon” or something on which a vote was actually taken. Moral hazard to the max, or what?

Comment by ecofeco
2009-02-28 17:49:19

Trail balloon. Ain’t gonna happen.

Comment by ecofeco
2009-02-28 17:50:50

“Trial.” Sorry, it’s Rodeo time again.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by tresho
2009-02-28 13:19:52

I’d say producing and running a series of commercials like the above would be money well spent… Don’t need to spend much money. Anyone with the ability to record off-the-air & create simple edits can post all he wants on YouTube. The classic video “Hitler Gets Foreclosed On” first mentioned on HBB’s Forum comes to mind.

 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2009-02-28 16:27:54

‘Well, you’re not the only ones. Did you know that millions of Americans live with debt they cannot control? That’s why I developed this unique new program for managing your debt. It’s called “Don’t Buy Stuff You Cannot Afford.” ‘

 
 
Comment by matthew
2009-02-28 08:19:48

Yes, of course I know this would never happen..

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 08:47:04

Wait for Bargains on These Five Items?

Airfare, computers, houses, home loans, cars

Absolutely horrible commentary. The airline analysis is inane, the notes on refi-ing don’t discuss the cost/benefit or whether you can actually qualify, and yet another bottom caller in real estate.

I expected better from Bankrate.

 
Comment by Namehasbeenchangedtoprotectdainnocent
2009-02-28 08:53:43

Son that’s not candy raining from the sky, its Crap from The Candy Crappin’ Unicorn.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-02-15-obama-book_N.htm

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-02-28 09:51:37

Yeah most of the Messiah’s voters figure Obama would make it rain candy, or at least $100 bills.

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-28 10:08:35

Gawd, life is gonna be tough for these short-bus kids!

Comment by tresho
2009-02-28 13:41:07

Life is hard, but life is hardest when you’re dumb
Between your ears a dark and silent vacuum
If there’s a void behind your face
why not rent out the vacant space
Life is hard, but life is hardest when you’re dumb

Austin Lounge Lizards

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2009-02-28 16:02:08

I remember all the Greenspan, Reagan & Bush worshippers telling us about the new age of unfettered prosperity if only we would decrease taxes and regulations on the rich. That was a candy crapping unicorn that everyone now wants to forget.

Comment by ecofeco
2009-02-28 17:55:49

You mean Voodoo Economics doesn’t work?

Who knew that when they said “trickle down, they REALlY meant “trickle.”?

But hey! You gotta love the new welfare queens, er, bankers, right? Much better class of lazy shiftlessness, don’t ya think?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-28 10:17:26

It is possible we see a near 10 pct one-day drop this upcoming week. There was an overwhelming amount of information for markets to absorb over the past week. Many investors may mull all of these new developments over the weekend and suddenly decide to quit.

The Iraq withdrawal affects the MIC. The budget negatively affects some businesses in healthcare, education, wealth management, agriculture, energy, and utilities. The problem with the banks has not been resolved. Insurance companies, an arm of FIRE, received downgrades. Add to that, breakage of key technical support levels.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 12:09:37

“It is possible we see a near 10 pct one-day drop this upcoming week.”

I don’t believe there have been many better times for gamblers to double down on their bets.

Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-28 14:23:00

We are jumping from one extreme of the spectrum to the other within days not months or years. It’s a mini revolution. TPTB are unleashing utter chaos on top of existing chaos. Read the budget.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 23:12:35

Well, maybe 1929-1932 was a better double-down time?

Wall Street Journal
* INVESTING
* FEBRUARY 28, 2009, 11:05 P.M. ET
Even the ‘Value’ Investors Can’t Beat This Bear
By MARK GONGLOFF

The risk of buying cheap stocks is that they can just keep getting cheaper.

That was certainly the case for all stocks last week, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 4.1% to 7062.93, its lowest close since May 1, 1997.

Battered by worries about the banking sector and a spreading global recession, broad stock indexes ended the week roughly where they were when Alan Greenspan made his famous “irrational exuberance” speech in December 1996. The Nasdaq fell 4.4% last week to 1377.84, while the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index lost 4.5% to 735.09.

The Dow is down 50% from its peak in October 2007, making this the second-worst bear market — typically defined as a 20% drop or more — of all time, trailing only the 89% decline from 1929-32.

 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-28 12:18:30

Being adroit with the charts, what do you see now that the S&P broke and closed beneath the NOV low?

Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-28 13:59:40

Given we are getting closer to the end of the quarter, we could see mid to upper 600 near term then a bump back up if we are lucky. We held on b/c it was the last week of the month and statements needed to be made. There is nothing like that to restrict selling in the first week. It could be uncontrolled.

We’ve retraced more than 50 pct of all historical gains. Low 600 is the next target, a 62 pct retrace. An entirely new heavy layer of risk was added to the market this week on top of all the chaos that already exist. Big Brother is back and he is bigger than ever. Conservatives are investors too and they no like.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-03-01 05:56:42

Thanks! I appreciate your insight.

Now I just have to get started on building that chicken coop out back.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-02-28 10:30:49

Vanguard 500 Index fund yield is now 3.68% in case you care:

http://quicktake.morningstar.com/FundNet/Snapshot.aspx?Country=USA&Symbol=VFINX

There are other interesting funds yielding more: VEIEX: 5.45%, DODFX: 5.01%, AAZAX: 4.32%

These are Trailing Twelve Month yields (TTM) so the current yield may be higher.

Comment by tresho
2009-02-28 13:42:46

I did much better than that when I dumped my VFINX holdings & put them into cash in 8/07.

 
Comment by trapped in houston
2009-02-28 21:40:41

on the other hand, a lot of companies that are prominent holdings in the above funds, eg, GE, are slashing their dividends, so the ttm yield may overstate current yield…

 
 
Comment by Terry
2009-02-28 10:51:17

I would tend to believe, that the Dow will see a fall to the 6000 level, by August. After all, since the invention of day trading, its become a gambling casino. I win you lose! I really think if were looking for the biggest ponzi scheme, we should be looking at the stock market. Soon, there won’t be any more new money, which exposes the scheme. Look out below!

Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-28 11:11:53

If it wasn’t for IBM, the DOW would have closed this week with a 6K handle. I don’t for one second believe they are immune from the global currency downdraft. The whole world is going off a cliff and they reaffirm their numbers. Insiders better not be selling.

 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 11:55:25

It’s not the daytraders… they’re the morons who step up and provide liquidity (and lots of fees for their brokers). No, it’s the self-dealing and the lies that make it a casino … the house always wins (but it looks like the house has caught fire this time).

Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-28 16:06:59

In today’s labor environment, everyone is a trader. Many think their future earnings are secure, but others above them and outside of the institution think and say otherwise. By signing up at Institution X, employees are essentially going long that institution.

 
 
 
Comment by not a gator
2009-02-28 11:01:02

Big V, those were lovely lines (verse? lyrics?) that you posted yesterday.

Comment by P. Pearsey von Peepwig
2009-02-28 17:12:56

Thanks, nag.

Comment by P. Pearsey von Peepwig
2009-02-28 17:14:30

I mean, I’ll tell Big V you said that. I’m sure she’d thank you for it.

-Peepers

 
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-28 11:26:14

We are in an economic period unlike any other we have faced. I think we are likely to have a long, slow recovery after the recession ends some time (hopefully early) next year. However, to suggest that corporate earnings are going to show the same type of resilience in 2010-2012 that they have after every other recession since WWII is ignoring the macroeconomic picture surrounding the potential for earnings growth. “Any starting conditions we select in the historical data cannot replicate the starting conditions at any other moment because the preceding events in the two cases are never identical.”

We are in a synchronized global recession. Yes, we will recover, but the causes are not those of the typical business-cycle recession. We are seeing massive debt deflation, deleveraging on a scale never witnessed, a financial industry that has to be rebuilt, and a housing industry that is reeling all over the world. We created a lot of excess in a number of industries. We decimated the savings of a generation that was hoping to retire soon, and now will have to work longer and save more.

This is not a typical recession. And for any analyst, writer, or pundit to trot out past historical data to demonstrate that the stock market is going to rebound at such and such a time and at such and such a pace simply ignores the fact that the future is unlikely to look like the past for at least the next 2-3 years. We are in a brand-new world, macro-economically speaking.

John Mauldin: Buy and Hope Investing

Comment by polly
2009-02-28 11:55:38

Yeah, that’s the depressing essay I referenced earlier in this thread. Nail biting stuff.

 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2009-02-28 12:25:15

And that’s probably the biggest argument against Benny’s prediction on Tuesday. If history followed a set pattern we’d all be rich.

 
 
Comment by 20910
2009-02-28 14:30:56

Polly, and any other other DC-area folks — did you see the Washington Post Magazine cover story about a young couple (giggle giggle) buying their very *first* home in Gaithursberg?

Is it a risk . . . or the opportunity of a lifetime?!?!?!?

Try not to retch:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/20/AR2009022001650.html

I especially like that she’s confident in her job — a catering manager at the Ritz. Cause nothing says job security in a recession like catering.

Comment by SDGreg
2009-02-28 22:02:27

I want to retch, and I’m not even to page two.

“We know that every housing market cycle since the Great Depression has seen home prices rebound from their bottom within a year or two of the beginning of the downturn,” says Kaufmann. “So, in at least five years from now, we should be well off the bottom.”

This is the second coming of the GD, idiot (Kaufmann)! In places that started falling first, we’re more than 3 years into the downturn and prices are still falling markedly. There won’t be a bottom yet at 5 years from the beginning of the downturn.

“What we’d love to have is brand-new build,” Jessalynn says at one point, because, she admits, with a sheepish smile, “I don’t want other people’s stuff and germs.”

Oh the horror of living in a place with previous occupants. These knife-catchers deserve to get a long @ss-re@ming with a forest of Joshua trees and they certainly will if they buy now. It’s like a 2005 time warp from House Hunters plus all the NAR talking points in between then and now.

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-28 16:12:57

Feb. 28 (Bloomberg) — Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez ordered the National Guard to take control of rice-processing companies after he said they evaded price controls and failed to properly supply the market.

Chavez warned companies attempting to stop production at that they risk appropriation of mills without compensation. Government-owned farms have increased rice production and bought new machinery, and there is no excuse for shortages of white rice, he said.

 
Comment by mrktMaven
2009-02-28 16:52:27

As ordinary citizens with no power over the levers of policy, we watch from the sidelines, and weep. The whole global economy has tipped into a downward spiral. Trade and output are contracting at rates that outstrip the leisurely depression of the 1930s. Debt deflation has simply washed over the drastic measures taken by governments everywhere.

Judging by the latest Merrill Lynch survey of fund managers, investors have a touching faith that China is going to rescue us all and re-ignite the commodity boom. How can this be? Taiwan’s exports to China fell 55pc in January, Japan’s fell 45pc. These exports are links in the supply chain for China’s industry. Manufacturing output in the Shanghai region fell 12pc in January.

My favourite China guru, Michael Pettis from Beijing University, is in despair…. The property bubble is bursting. Developers have built more offices in Beijing since 2006 than the entire stock in Manhattan. There is a 14-year supply glut. We have seen this movie before.

Factory output is collapsing at the fastest pace everywhere. The figures for the most recent month available are, year-on-year: Taiwan (-43pc), Ukraine (-34pc), Japan (-30pc), Singapore (-29pc), Hungary (-23pc), Sweden (-20pc), Korea (-19pc), Turkey (-18pc), Russia (-16pc), Spain (-15pc), Poland (-15pc), Brazil (-15pc), Italy (-14pc), Germany (-12pc), France (-11pc), US (-10pc) and Britain (-9pc). Norway sails blissfully on (+4pc). What do they drink up there?

This terrifying fall has been concentrated in the last five months. The job slaughter has barely begun. Social mayhem comes with a 12-month lag. By comparison, industrial output in core-Europe fell 2.8pc in 1930, 5.1pc in 1931 and 3.9pc in 1932, according to RBS.

Stephen Lewis, from Monument Securities, says we have been lulled into a false sense of security by the lack of “soup kitchens”. The visual cues from Steinbeck’s America are missing. “The temptation for investors is to see this as just another recession, over by the end of the year. But this is not a normal cycle. It is a cataclysmic structural breakdown,” he said.

AEP: We need shock and awe policies to halt depression

Comment by Faster Pussycat, Sell Sell
2009-02-28 18:09:25

What can you do? Monetize the debt?!?

Fine, but that doesn’t mean that credit is gonna flow freely after that. After overconsuming comes the hangover.

 
 
Comment by dude
2009-02-28 18:23:12

Thank you MissGredenko.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 23:06:46

Berkshire was ‘Buffetted’ by worse-than-expected market forces (including those nasty financial weapons of mass destruction)…

Buffett’s Berkshire has worst results ever
By Justin Baer in New York
Published: February 28 2009 20:18 | Last updated: February 28 2009 20:18

Warren Buffett conceded that his holding company, Berkshire Hathaway, turned in its worst performance on record as the financial crisis drew the world’s economy into a deepening recession, and gave investors little reason to believe a turnaround is imminent.

In his annual letter to Berkshire shareholders, Mr Buffett recounted how frozen credit markets dovetailed with tumbling home and stock prices to imperil many of the world’s biggest banks and produce “a paralyzing fear that engulfed the country.”

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-02-28 23:18:04

Wall Street Journal
* FEBRUARY 28, 2009, 4:30 P.M. ET
Berkshire Hathaway Reports Worst Year Ever
Insurance, Stock Holdings Are Hit; Buffett Warns of Bubble in Treasurys
By SCOTT PATTERSON

The man considered by many to be the greatest investor of all time just had his worst year ever.

Berkshire Hathaway Inc., the large holding company steered by Warren Buffett, reported Saturday that its far-flung empire, ranging from insurance to ice cream to underwear, took some big hits from the sharp economic downturn in 2008.

A common metric Berkshire uses to track performance, book value per share, fell 9.6% in 2008, its biggest decline since Mr. Buffett took over the company in 1965 when it was a family-run East Coast textile maker.

Berkshire’s report was yet another stark sign of the severity of the financial crisis that continues to roil stock markets and businesses around the world. It was only the second year in more than 40 years that Berkshire’s book value per share fell; it was down 6.2% in 2001.

Mr. Buffett, in his annual letter closely read by shareholders and nonshareholders alike, said he didn’t expect an improved economy any time soon but did expect better times eventually.

“Our country has faced far worse travails in the past,” he said. “Without fail, however, we’ve overcome them.” He declined to draw a correlation between stocks and economics, saying that while he was certain the economy would be “in shambles for 2009″ that “does not tell us whether the stock market will rise or fall.”

In 2008, Berkshire’s Class A stock fell 32%. This year the shares are down about 19%, slightly better than the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Mr. Buffett credited the federal government for stepping in with massive assistance last year, saying the intervention was “essential” to avoiding a total breakdown. But he cautioned there could be “unwelcome aftereffects,” such as inflation.

On oil, he said “odds are good that oil sells far higher in the future than the current $40 to $50 price. But so far I have been dead wrong.” And on Treasurys, he contended that the “investment world has gone from underpricing risk to overpricing it.” Future historians will comment on the Internet bubble of the 1990s and the housing bubble of the early 2000s, he said, but ” the U.S. Treasury bond bubble of late 2008 may be regarded as almost equally extraordinary.”

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-03-01 07:14:05

Buffett to America: “In the short run, we are collectively doomed. In the long run, we will shine.”

Buffett Says Economy ‘In Shambles,’ Promises Better Days Ahead
By Erik Holm and Andrew Frye

March 1 (Bloomberg) — Billionaire Warren Buffett said the economy will be “in shambles” this year, and perhaps longer, before recovering from the reckless lending that caused the worst “freefall” he ever saw in the financial system.

Stocks and the economy will rebound, and the best days for the U.S. are ahead, said Buffett, chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., in his annual letter to shareholders yesterday. Buffett said he’ll spend the recession shopping for new investments for Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire.

“The economy will be in shambles throughout 2009 — and, for that matter, probably well beyond,” said Buffett. “Though the path has not been smooth, our economic system has worked extraordinarily well over time. It has unleashed human potential as no other system has, and it will continue to do so.”

Comment by jeff saturday
2009-03-01 07:47:12

“That`s my plan anyway, maybe I`ll get crushed too.”

“Excellent! It’s an exciting time to dollar cost average when you cannot even tell whether the ship will make it back in to port before it sinks.”

 
 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post