May 10, 2009

Bits Bucket For May 10, 2009

Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here. Please visit the HBB Forum. And see the American Visionaries series from Schwarzfilm.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

171 Comments »

Comment by palmetto
2009-05-10 04:57:14

Happy Mother’s Day to all the moms on this blog. From the Palmster.

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-05-10 08:07:05

Palmy,

I’ll pass your wishes on to my mom. She’s one of those that lurk. Loves the conversations that fly back and forth.

Thank you.

Comment by mikey
2009-05-10 08:29:29

“I’ll pass your wishes on to my mom. She’s one of those that lurk. Loves the conversations that fly back and forth”

Sheesh…your Mom’s a lurker. Ben’s Mom’s a lurker. Next thing I know, my Mom will be in here spying on me. These Mom’s are worse than the Chickenman.

“They’re everywhere…they’re everywhere !!”

:)

Comment by polly
2009-05-10 09:08:01

Count yourselves lucky. My mother accuses me of being a selfish bitch nearly every time I talk to her. OK, not in so many words, but now that I am trying to figure out the timing for my knee surgery so that I can be there for the party when my nephew is born, she keeps intoning over and over again that I will “do what is best for you, do what is best for you.” No, I’m not. I’m in pain. The best thing for me is to take the first appointment available. I’m going to take my brother’s feelings into account. This after she suggested that I would be just fine taking a cab home after general anesthsia, as if a hospital would even allow that anyway.

If you honetly like your mother, count yourself lucky.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Crash and Burn
2009-05-10 09:25:18

My mother passed in 1999. If your mom still lives count yourself lucky.

 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-05-10 09:35:16

Polly,
Boy can I relate. My mother has a PhD in guilt and misery. Having the quintessential narcissist and pita for a mother can be a challenge. Oh she can be nice, but it usually means its a “butter” job.

I hope your mother can put the h*ll of your pain in perspective. I send my care and a hug. Pain sucks.

 
Comment by exeter
2009-05-10 09:52:27

“If you honetly like your mother, count yourself lucky.”

Polly,

No truer words have ever been spoken. I used to feel like there is something wrong with me because the fact is, I plain *don’t like my mother*. I don’t like her. Period. I’ve since gotten over the guilt of that fact after my siblings have finally gotten a gasp of sane air and expressed the same sentiments as me but I was first to refuse to get sucked into her madness. Most of my siblings have establish inflexible boundaries when it comes to dealing with her. It’s a very dry relationship with her now. Weather is about the only topic we allow ourselves to be sucked into when dealing with her.

 
Comment by polly
2009-05-10 09:54:06

See, the thing is, my mother isn’t a complet narcissist. She just has a limited capacity for caring and I am always at the bottom of the list. Love the time she made me promise to take care of my brother and uncle finacially (not let them starve) at a time when I was out of work. Right now my Dad, who just had much more serious surgery, and my brother, whose wife is about to produce grandchild number two, are all she chooses to think about. When my father had his surgery, her original plan was to send him to the hospital by himself and not show up until the next afternoon. Why? Because she is too scared to drive home from Boston and thoguht calling a cab to take her to the train station was “too complicated.”

Like I said, not a complete narcissist (that would have been my Dad’s mom), but very very limited in her ability to deal with life which is a problem since she is not even 68 yet. Every once in a while I wonder if she blames me for not convincing them to get out of the market before the crash - I did tell them when I got out and why, but she follows Bob Brinker and didn’t pay any attention.

 
Comment by bluprint
2009-05-10 10:53:28

What a bunch of contrarians…hating mom on mother’s day.

But I guess I’ll call her today. I suppose in a way she did give me some tools to make good decisions as an adult. Whenever I wonder if I should do something (or how best to do it), I think about what she and/or my stepdad would do and then do the opposite. Works every time.

Interstingly, a few weeks ago voz posted that he missed his father. It made me think, if my parents were dead I don’t think I would miss them at all. Not that I don’t have any feelings, I’m sure I would be sad if one of them died but I wouldn’t really MISS them on an ongoing basis. Neither really offers anything of benefit to me.

So, with my pending parenthood, I’ve decided that I at least want to be missed if I die. What I mean is hopefully I will offer to my daughter some guidance or knowledge or wisdom or something that is useful to her in her life on an ongoing basis and perhaps be a source of further guidance or information. Perhaps that is one measure of a successful parent…?

 
Comment by BanteringBear
2009-05-10 11:08:16

I’m happy to know others aren’t so fond of certain family members. I get along well with my mom, but I can’t stand my oldest sister. She’s an evil narcissist. One has to experience one of these people to understand how horrible they really are.

 
Comment by InMontana
2009-05-10 11:24:04

so that I can be there for the party when my nephew is born,

That’s the part I don’t get. When did day of birth become on occasion for a party? Who says you have to be there? I sure as hell wasn’t at my nephews’ births. I was on the road working and living my life. It seems like families are creepier and more suffocating than every. I can’t stand all the “birthday parties” my in-laws have for barely cognizant toddlers. Junior’s third birthday invariably morphs into into hours of standing around and sitting around, boredom drinking and snacking while staring into yet another air-polluting bonfire while the kid tears around on his new baby-sized ATV. BFD.

 
Comment by Crash and Burn
2009-05-10 13:29:05

I will be flamed for this. So be it. Polly,exter,wipeout,you all seem to be smart people. It’s Mothers Day. Using simple logic, if you had no mothers you would not be here. Not to mention your mom carried you ungrateful rear ends around for 9 months, and, at great deal of pain, gave you life.

She changed your daipers. She fed you. She may not have done the best she could, but since you seem to be smart people she must have done something right. Today, one day, give her a call and tell you you love her.

I’m sorry if I have insulted you. I’m sure if we met to trade screwed up mother stories I could keep up with you all.

But I will tell you that 10 years after your mother is dead and in the ground, time will have softened the imperfections, and most of what will stay with you are the good memories. And always remember, you are part of your mom. And she will always be part of you. Like it or not. It’s just the way it is.

 
Comment by polly
2009-05-10 14:55:13

We’re Jewish. The bris happens when the baby is 8 days old. It is a religious ceremony and my brother will be very hurt if I don’t show up. And his wife is very into families being together for happy occasions. She lost her father when she was a young adult and it means a lot to her. The doc said the first big improvement will be about three weeks after the procedure and I should not plan to travel long distances before then, especially if I am going to drive. So I’ll wait. I’d rather not, but I will.

I agree that the huge, over the top parties for toddlers are a bit much. They end up crying when too many people touch their stuff anyway. Kiddie electric cars are a whole other ball game. I bet the Hummer folks actually thought they would be able to build brand loyalty in the munchkins. And the FBs are not going to have room for them in the rentals they move to when they have to leave the McMansions.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-10 17:33:44

What I mean is hopefully I will offer to my daughter some guidance or knowledge or wisdom or something that is useful to her in her life on an ongoing basis and perhaps be a source of further guidance or information.

Well, since you’re already arguing with your wife about how to manage your daughter’s freakin’ allowance, and she hasn’t even got born yet—- let alone learned how to drive to the Mall and flirt with pimply boys and waste her allowance on cheap frippery and inappropriately tight clothes— I imagine you will be a diligent and attentive daddy. And we’ve all read your posts for many moons now and I’m sure everyone else, like me, finds you to be perceptive and good-hearted. So, what more could a daughter want?

 
Comment by bluprint
2009-05-10 20:39:41

a new car? a pony?

I dunno…ur a daughter. I’m a son. Why are you asking me?

 
Comment by CA renter
2009-05-10 22:49:43

bluprint,

Just my personal opinion, but having lived with a narcissistic mother (who was highly critical) and passive-aggressive father (who never gave advice even when you wanted it), the best advice I can give is to just “be there” for your kid(s).

Be loving, accepting, loyal, helpful and kind to your kids while balancing that with teaching them about responsibility, dependability, honesty, and integrity.

All too often, parents mean well when they want to give advice and guidance, but that advice and guidance should not interfere with your relationship if your child decides to do things differently.

You are on the right track because you are thinking about this right now, which is a good indication of what kind of parent you’ll be. I’m sure you’ll do very well and have children who greatly appreciate you.

Enjoy your soon-to-be new family! :)

 
 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-05-10 15:21:46

Polly,
I’m at the bottom of the care list too, with my *itch of a mother. (fill in either “B” or “W”.) I am the one she called to do her accounting and paralegal stuff, in settling my father’s death settlements, as I evidently owed it to her. She is the center of the universe. After 60 hrs of work and expenses, she takes me out to lunch. She told me she would pay me, and didn’t. Then she said she would pay the expenses and didn’t. She stiffed me. She got 10’s of $1,000’s, while I got the expenses. Gee mom, those actions say “I Love You”.

Your mother and mine must be sisters. My mother treated my father’s last year as an inconvenience. People tell me my mother is sweet. (an acting job) My eyes roll. I only wish she treated me like the precious grandchildren. Its not about the bio thing.

Keep us informed on your surgery date.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2009-05-10 16:02:44

Thanks though your experience is a lot worse than mine. And I will let people know about the surgery. It is looking like June 19th so far. Very minor. I’m told the crutches are likely to last anywhere from 4 minutes to about 4 days. The doc I didn’t like told me physical therapy was a must. The new one says most people just need to do a few exercises but more can be arrange if there is a problem. Guess which doc owns a financial interest in the physical therapy place…

 
Comment by exeter
2009-05-10 16:40:08

C&B, BP, That’s great you have a workable relationship with your respective mothers. I don’t nor do my siblings. When you walk a few miles in my forty-something shoes, then judge. I was merely identifying with Polly’s challenged relationship with her mother.

 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-05-10 17:06:51

Polly,
Do you have a P O Box we can all send get well cards to? You’re such a special lady, I would love to send you one, as I bet everyone at hbb would.

I found PT a waste of time, after I learned what to do. You’re disipline too, so if you “must” go, get the scoop and do it at home (if you can) Mine was transferable to solo sessions. I was bed ridden/wheelchair for 3 weeks, crutches for 4 weeks, and finally started to walk. So, I would assume you’ll be in better shape post op. I got my figure back quickly, since I had one pre-op.

You’re bright and wonderful. What a delightful combo.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-10 18:13:03

Polly, awaiting wipeout, exeter: that’s just freakin’ horrid. I’m truly sincerely sorry to hear it.
My own mom is just a well-meaning devout brain-washed dingle who relies on prayer and Jeebus to take care of things. That wistful attitude produced some deeply unpleasant results, but at least she didn’t MEAN to do it to us. It wasn’t like all cunning and mediated and seriously evil. (That was my dad’s job. Ha! :) )

Man, just drink some beer and count the hours until Mother’s Day is allllll gone for another year, is my advice. And I shall go pray that one day all of your mom’s get to sit down and really spend some quality time with themselves….

*Like there’d be a better punishment.

 
Comment by bluprint
2009-05-10 18:58:55

Ex my reply got messed up…I’m in agreement. Don’t like my moms either. No judging here…

 
Comment by cactus
2009-05-10 20:36:24

“The doc I didn’t like told me physical therapy was a must. The new one says most people just need to do a few exercises but more can be arrange if there is a problem. Guess which doc owns a financial interest in the physical therapy place…”

see if you can get one of the electronic stim machines its pretty neat just tape the electrodes to your leg above the knee and turn it on it will work the mucsle and you can watch TV or read a book.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-10 15:36:55

Happy Mother’s Day, SFBayGal’s mom!!!

P.S. Lest anyone accuse me of abdicating dad’s duties on mother’s day, I just finished cooking dinner. I am now entitled to a little bitty blog fix :-)

P.P.S. My wife is wearing her pink HBB tee shirt today :-)

Comment by CA renter
2009-05-10 22:53:29

:)

I dare you guys to go out in public with them.

We still haven’t worked up the guts, though we do enjoy wearing them at home.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-10 18:00:25

Palmy, I’ll pass your wishes on to my mom. She’s one of those that lurk. Loves the conversations that fly back and forth.

Really? Well, tell her she done good with the ‘high-quality daughter-production’ endeavor. Or, since she lurks here, let me just shout it out by myself…”Yo! You! SanFranGal’s lurkin’ mum! You done good with the ‘high-quality daughter production!”

:)

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-05-10 19:47:26

Thank you Olygal.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-05-10 05:06:41

I’m out of retirement:

Happy Mothers day, My wish for all is your Mother (father) left you a fully paid off house and you respected them by not helocing it up the wazoo.

Comment by Dave of the North
2009-05-10 05:48:33

Our mother did leave a paid off house to the 5 of us, back in 2005. Since none of still live in our home town, we sold it (for around $120 K). The new people sunk probably that much more into it (new windows, new siding, new kitchen, new hardwood etc etc, including digging a new foundation and moving the house further back in the lot.) Last we heard they bought another house to renovate and are renting our old house out…

 
Comment by Big V
2009-05-10 09:35:31

What happened, you got a job? RU glad?

Comment by aNYCdj
2009-05-10 10:26:16

Click on my handle…I was taping him last night….great fun high energy music….listen to the music Right Now is Prime time

One of the best songs i heard in years

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-10 18:02:12

I’m glad you’re all cheery, aNYCdj. And I will echo Muggy’s advice the other day…get out, do fun stuff, meet good people, and don’t jam your head full of worries, ’cause that’s to no avail.

Good luck to you.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by B. Durbin
2009-05-10 14:10:54

My parents’ house is fully paid off (including this year’s $20K furnace & air replacement.)

My wish is that they don’t leave it to me for another 40 years. :D

 
 
Comment by ATE-UP
2009-05-10 05:40:51

Happy Mother’s Day (like Palmy said), to all the great Mothers on this blog.

 
Comment by mikey
2009-05-10 05:55:51

Yeah..Happy Mother’s Day.

Legal Disclaimer: I did not cause all those grey hairs Mom, it must have been my older brother.

;)

Comment by palmetto
2009-05-10 06:00:46

I know I caused my mother a lot of those gray hairs. She passed away a couple of years ago and today I miss her. She provided me and my sibs with a great childhood and opportunities. And she frequently sacrificed her own happiness to accomodate her kids.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2009-05-10 07:00:12

Hey Mom,
Thanks for all the times you swept the alley before I got home from school…How did you always know I’d be out the back door in less than 30 seconds with my basketball? ;-) Oh, and that summer Saturday morning you found Patti xxxxxxx asleep on my bed, really…we were up all night…just talking! :-)

 
 
Comment by cougar91
2009-05-10 06:13:30

Did anyone catch SNL opening skit on Tim Geithner last night? It was hilarious. It was mocking the stress test as having gone from a scale of 0-100, to pass/fail, to pass/pass*, to just pass after “consultation” with the 19 banks. Also the stress test questions were mocked, one particular question that I remembered was “Women is under-represented in the banking industry. They should be encouraged to apply for a job in banking if they are:” and the Morgan Stanley answer was “Doable”. Ha ha. :-D

Comment by palmetto
2009-05-10 06:24:37

Didn’t see it, but sounds great. Those stress tests are a complete mockery.

I hold with what Ben said in yesterday’s Cali thread. It’s almost too much to contemplate living in an insane system like that. All I can say is, some folks in the financial industry and at the FED, etc., deserve the sort of equivalent medical care to what they’re dishing out in the area of finance.

Comment by Muir
2009-05-10 09:01:22

Here’s the Geithner sketch

(add the w’s)

.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/video/clips/geithner-cold-open/1099562/

Comment by CA renter
2009-05-10 23:04:47

Great clip. Thanks for posting that, Muir. :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-05-10 06:30:26

As is often the case, there’s an uncomfortable amount of truth in that SNL skit.

Next thing is to watch how GMAC (Government Motors Acceptance Corp.) begins to provide “special” rates for political bigwigs, and bends their credit rating rules for
“disadvantaged” and victim-class customers. It also won’t be long before we see 110% lending, as a form of “stimulus.”

Comment by polly
2009-05-10 09:39:26

I don’t know about GMAC specifically, but more than 100% loans were commonplace at the car dealers. If people came in needing a repair and didn’t have the money to pay for it, they would be steared to purcahse a new car with $0 down AND the loan balance of the old car loan (minus a very low trade in value for the broken car) added to the new loan. There was reporting about this. Car dealers loved it because they made a bundle off fixing and reselling the trade ins and the finance people loved it because they got a new fee and a new loan to securitize. Everybody won except for the moron who had a $40K recourse loan on a $27K car.

Comment by InMontana
2009-05-10 11:35:20

That was all going on long before this housing bubble. Got a son in law who was perpetually upside down, constantly trading one big a$$ 4×4 for another because the one he had just wasn’t right. Went BK last year and now drives a Lexus 4×4. Sheesh.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by rms
2009-05-10 22:39:02

“If people came in needing a repair and didn’t have the money to pay for it, they would be steared to purcahse a new car with $0 down AND the loan balance of the old car loan (minus a very low trade in value for the broken car) added to the new loan.”

That’s exactly what one of the worker’s at my office did. He’s a real scammer, and I’m sure he was thoroughly familiar with the practice.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by skroodle
2009-05-10 09:55:39

“begins”? I assumed, like Countrywide, GMAC already provided special “friends and family” rates to Congress.

 
 
Comment by Steve W
2009-05-10 07:25:17

I also liked Citibank’s answer for everything:

“Geithner s#@ks!”

Comment by Matt_in_TX
2009-05-10 09:18:53

Closed our 30 year BofA accounts last month, but stupidly kept their credit card.

This month, they charged us a $20 debit for a zero balance credit card to the closed account, and happily a $39 “returned” fee. I’m so pleased to be teaching basic accounting to their high school age programmers next week…

Comment by BanteringBear
2009-05-10 17:55:15

Happy to hear it, Matt. I’ll be closing out my B of A accounts this year.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-05-11 04:42:41

Closing a credit card account brings down your FICO. Use it for a small purchase every month or two, and pay it in full on time. Don’t screw yourself.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by az_lender
2009-05-10 06:40:12

(Hope this isn’t a double post; over 90 min since I tried)

I have been asserting that a 15-year amortization at 9% interest on a starting LTV of 80% will protect me against the likelihood of my borrowers’ going underwater. This a.m. I did some calculation to see how true or false that is. Of course the answer depends on the future rate of RE depreciation. If only 7.5% per year down, from here on, my borrowers will never be underwater. However, at 10% per annum depreciation, the borrower is (slightly) underwater from year 4 through year 11. After that, if (s)he continues paying, the equity is once again positive. And why would (s)he continue paying? Because the submersion level is only about 15% and the borrower is in denial about the depreciation! that’s why.

A depreciation rate of 15%/year is a different story. Borrowers would be running away left and right. Although this narrative pertains to my personal business, it makes it easier to see why the PTB are so anxious to slow down and prolong the bust.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2009-05-10 07:08:03

“…A depreciation rate of 15%/year is a different story. Borrowers would be running away left and right.” ;-)

And with mortgage rates @ 14% they wouldn’t have to run away, they’d simply just never show up! Of, course maybe running is more healthy, maybe, perhaps… ;-)

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2009-05-10 07:18:09

‘over 90 min since I tried’

FYI, there is no previous comment in the moderation file. Sometimes it can be other problems. To my knowledge the servers are functioning well right now.

Comment by az_lender
2009-05-10 13:54:30

thanks, Ben. my weak net connection was to blame.

 
 
Comment by polly
2009-05-10 08:15:27

Aren’t you lending on primary residences? In that case, won’t the ability to get alternative housing in a similar neighborhood for a lower cost also play into the analysis? And since your borrowers often can’t borrow at your rates from anyone else, purchasing at a lower price may still cost them more per month.

And how is the rental market in these areas?

Comment by az_lender
2009-05-10 13:32:42

You are right, the realistic alternatives for MY borrowers might be few. But the larger point about why Washington wants to keep the whole thing sloooooow does stand.

Comment by polly
2009-05-10 15:04:37

It has been a while since I said it, but I have always believed that most of the bailouts have been aimed at slowing things down and a lot of that is to benefit the state and local politicians. The state and local officials are key to re-election for most of the incumbents in Congress. And while the state and local people may be able to cut costs over a number of years, they can’t do it instantly. Contracts are in place. Projects are committed to. Cutting the payroll by 10% 3 years in a row hurts like anything, but it is easier than cutting 27% in one year. And time allows the stimulus spending to pick up some of the slack.

You can agree or disagree on whether it is a good idea for the economy as a whole, but if you look at their priorities, it makes a lot of sense.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2009-05-10 18:42:32

Good points.

 
Comment by CA renter
2009-05-10 23:09:05

Yes, good post, polly.

BTW, hope you have a quick and easy surgery and recovery. Best of luck!

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Michael Fink
2009-05-10 06:43:34

Question for the masses:

How long after the expiration of the tax credit do you think before the next leg down in housing begins? Obviously (IMHO) the tax credit is stimulating activity, especially in the hardest hit markets. That 8K in cash is certainly adding at least 40K to home prices (assuming 20% down/5 to 1 leverage), at least, IMHO. However, I’m getting to the point where I am ready to buy, but, at the same time, don’t like the idea at ALL of bidding against people using govt money for the downpayments. I think I have to wait until it expires, but I’m just wondering, how long do you all think it will take for the prices to fall after the credit expires? Or don’t you think they will fall after the credit expires? Or do you think the credit is having no effect at all, and therefore I should disregard it?

The thing that’s pretty funny is that my RE agent told me that she’s working with another couple that was looking at the same home and wanted to use the credit to buy it. Problem was, the home was 425K (requiring a ~150K in income to support), the other couple SHOULD be limited out of the credit if they can really afford that home, no?

Comment by Fresno Dude
2009-05-10 06:55:43

You do not get the $8,000 tax credit until you get your tax return next year. If you claim 29 dependents, or what ever, you could speed it up some by reducing your monthly tax withholding. I suppose one could get some kind of a bridge loan.

Comment by Michael Fink
2009-05-10 07:59:48

I won’t get the credit anyway. What I’m worried about is buying into a market that’s fueled by the credit. Just like the subprime loans, you’re not on equal footing with other buyers; they don’t have the downpayments, they are getting them from the govt. I want to buy when all the people who are bidding against me are also qualified to buy the home. That’s my concern about buying while the credit is still active.

My question really is, do you think that this credit will lead to a sharp drop in prices when it goes away, or can somehow stabilize prices and have them remain stable after the credit expires?

Comment by Big V
2009-05-10 09:52:01

Prices will drop when it goes away, of course. Why shouldn’t they?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Pullthetrigger?
2009-05-10 10:03:01

They’ll just extend and/or expand the credit next year. Have you thought of that?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2009-05-10 23:23:04

PTT,

Afraid you’re probably right about them extending all the give-aways.

Michael, I can really empathize with what you’re feeling. We’ve been bubble-sitting since mid-2004, and were **finally** starting to see sanity return to the housing market, when WHAM, the govt gets involved and gums everything up again.

It’s exceedingly frustrating, and we DON’T want to get into bidding wars with future FBs.

They are making this process as painful as possible for all people, especially those of us who tried to do the right thing by not living under mountains of debt.

 
 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2009-05-11 09:41:33

That’ll never happen - I have a bad feeling that prices are going to to be stuck at various levels of “unaffordable” for years to come in many markets, particulary those that didn’t get washed away in the subprime collapse.

The handing out of out money to gambling morons will continue until there is no more money to give away. That is what is so infuriating about this: I cannot compete with ding-dongs who are willing to pay 2/3’s of their salary on a 3% down toxic loan to “own” a house - and yet it is those people who are setting the housing prices!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by parrish dave
2009-05-10 06:57:19

I personally think that any slight “pop” is temporary. There is a tremendous number of homes in the shadow inventory (at least from what we are seeing not only in the area but in our subdivision). We went out last weekend in the surrounding areas and saw many untended empty homes with no signs. We have a number of them in our sub just like this. I think with the ongoing huge job losses many potential buyers will hold off on purchases due to uncertainty. We are still well above historical levels of homeownership so how many potential buyers can there be? I think we’re in the second (short) knifecatcher phase and we won’t consider buying for at least another year. Even when a recovery starts, we think prices will stay flat for awhile.
JMHO

Comment by palmetto
2009-05-10 07:32:02

Hi, Dave, I don’t know if you saw my post yesterday on the listing in Riverbend. A listing on craigslist for $121,000, with 100% USDA financing. I did give a little rundown on Riverbend and what it’s like and one of the bloggers was surprised it was that bad.

The local news is running a story on a Ruskin family affected by Chinese drywall and although they haven’t identified the subdivision, I’d be willing to bet it is Riverbend where they live.

Comment by Ol'Bubba
2009-05-10 08:25:48

The local news didn’t identify the subdivision???

WTF??? (whisky tango foxtrot)

Is it my imagination, or is that an example of negligent journalism?

Geez…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2009-05-10 09:43:19

To be fair, I believe they did identify the street, without identifying the subdivision or development. But it flashed by so fast, I didn’t quite get the name.

Seeing ads now for PI attorneys looking for Chinese drywall victims. The story on the news made clear that insurance doesn’t cover it.

 
 
Comment by DennisN
2009-05-10 08:55:18

I’ve noticed a few posts and news articles discussing “USDA financing”. What the heck is this all about?

US Department of Agriculture. Why are they extending loans for houses in a subdivision? I suppose there might be some valid jurisdiction to give loans to farmers for farmland, but what’s with giving loans in places like Riverbend?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2009-05-10 09:40:57

DennisN, I haven’t researched the whys and wherefores of USDA loans. I read something in the local fishwrap a couple of weeks ago about the Ruskin area getting money from the USDA. Ruskin does have a certain amount of “agricultural” activity, like tomato farms, tropical fish farming, strawberries, some citrus, etc. When I was at loose ends and looking for a place to rent, I rather innocently walked into what I was told was a new apartment complex, only to find out it was subsidized housing for agricultural workers, and you had to be employed in the ag business to live there.

My guess is, the USDA lending is justified by the area, not the individual property. I was rather surprised they would lend on a home in Riverbend, which theoretically would be beyond the means of most ag workers in the area. But I predict this house, if is IS purchased by an ag worker, will be occupied by extended family members, or perhaps they’ll rent rooms out, in order to pay the mortgage.

 
 
Comment by parrish dave
2009-05-10 09:54:01

Hey Palmetto,
It’s been a few months since we cruised thru Riverbend, but it was horrible at that time. I have noticed on the MLS listings that almost all of our neighbors left after we did. The listings are all bank owned so I’m sure the few that had bought just up and left. The asking prices are running at close to 70% off the original purchase prices and still not selling. I saw a new listing yesterday for a 3100 sf home in the back section that sold for 500k+ and now asking 144k. The problem is apparently that place is terribly crime infested and no one in their right mind would dare to buy in there at any price. We’ve been gone from there a year next month and it is continuing it’s jouney to becoming a ghetto. We were renting a Lennar home and the drywall appeared to be OK. Did you get your new digs? If so, where did you end up?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by palmetto
2009-05-10 10:07:14

Hi, dave, thanks for the update. exeter took a look at the house in the listing and was surprised the area is as you and I have described it. Since you had actual experience living there, I thought you would be a more credible source to put the place in perspective. But I can understand how people would find it difficult to believe that the place is crime infested.

Yep, got my new digs. In Sun City Center. No jokes, now. I’m just old enuf to live here, it is calm and quiet and you can’t beat the facilities. Three pools, fitness center, all sorts of clubs and stuff. Great place to hang your hat if you’re over 55.

 
Comment by palmetto
2009-05-10 10:16:33

On another note, I recently spoke to a local lady, she and her husband bought there for $240,000. OUCHIE! That’s the way she feels, too. They thought it would be great for their kids, but they’ve already experienced having their car broken into. They really regret having purchased there but are gamely trying to make a go of it.

Riverbend is one of the poster children for bubble development for sure. But there are enough residents that it isn’t going to be plowed under any time in the near future. I feel sorry for anyone who purchased there at peak, or at any time, for that matter.

 
Comment by parrish dave
2009-05-10 11:23:57

Just screwed up trying to post. OK second try - Good for you, Sun City is a decent place for retiree and or close to it. We eat out on the weekends but there really isn’t much choice there - a couple decent places in Brandon but the traffic is ridiculous. We are in the same boat here - have to go to Bradenton or Sarasota which is a pain. It’s telling how phony any idea of wealth is in this area, thousands of expensive homes and few decent restaurants. HMMM - they can afford these places but can’t afford to eat out ???? Yeah. We are retiring in about 2 years and are trying to decide where to settle in central FL. We’ve decided against SW FL though - to be polite it’s a little too pedestrian - not being snobbish LOL.

 
Comment by JJ
2009-05-27 12:21:11

I wouldn’t consider Riverbend terribly crime infested. It’s not crime infested at all. I live there. There are several police related residents that live there as well, my husband being one of them. Some of the problems that were reported recently came from a group of teenagers who LIVE in Riverbend and come from good homes. Unruly teenagers do not make an area crime infested, you can have misbehaving kids ANYWHERE. I love the block that we live on. It’s filled with wonderful families that take pride in the community. FYI, the local Pop Warner Football/Cheer association was started by families in Riverbend. We maybe upside down on our home, but we don’t plan on moving anytime soon.
And yes the Chinese drywall story was in Riverbend, it was one of my neighbors infact. Still good people, good community. Bad drywall. We will get our drywall fixed and stay with OUR community. Your community is only as good as the people in it.

 
 
 
Comment by mikey
2009-05-10 07:41:42

Between the economic forces of fear and the prospects of September 3Q onward , I expect a lot of really scared property owners/debtors from the banks to J6P.

Old fashioned Fear and Pain ARE great motivators and do serve a purpose…especially with the greedy, slow learners and stupid people.

:)

 
Comment by cereal
2009-05-10 07:44:27

8,000 tx credit doesn’t even come up in conversation in my neighborhood.

This would appeal more to the “watch every penny” crowd shopping for a $129,000 starter home

me thinks

Comment by oxide
2009-05-10 13:30:40

In my neigborhood, I’m seeing “$8,000 TAX CREDIT” on the For Sale signs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by whyoung
2009-05-10 13:38:53

I think certainly will tempt some people as, on the surface, it appears to be $8000 of free money…
Considering the average income in this country (especially the flyover) it looks like a big gift until you look in the horse’s mouth, which as we know a lot of them won’t do.

 
 
 
 
Comment by combotechie
2009-05-10 07:17:47

Google up “mortgage reset chart” and spend some time thinking about what it is telling you.

It’s truly a picture that’s worth a thousand words.

Comment by Michael Viking
2009-05-10 07:41:47

I *think* it’s telling me that with the Fed keeping interest rates at historic lows the alt-a people are gonna get great deals :-) It would seem only the option loans would have trouble since most likely their principal went up. But those loans look like they start resetting in 2010-2011. By then the Fed and the Gov will have it all figured out and those people will be okay. I think I heard just last week from Bernankruptcy that the economy will start pulling out of its dive sometime this year.

Seriously though: other than people who have option loans and opt not to pay much (and I realize this could be huge), aren’t the rest of the loans going to be fine? These loans are only an issue if the interest rate resets higher. I admit I don’t know much, but I always thought the loans would end up around the interest rate at the time of reset, so with interest rates at historic lows, what would be the trouble for people who have amortizing loans? Hmm, maybe a lot of the loans in the non “option adjusted rate” are interest only?

Comment by polly
2009-05-10 08:19:55

It is always going to reset higher if the teaser rate was 3 or 4%.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by drumminj
2009-05-10 09:19:11

I suppose so long as rates stay low and they’re not teaser rate loans, then it’s likely to be less of an issue. But if people are looking to get out of the ARM, isn’t the issue whether they can refinance at all? If the house is worth less than the current note, then they’d have to bring money to the table to refinance the loan?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Big V
2009-05-10 14:36:25

They all have option loans. Otherwise, they wouldn’t have taken a chance on the variable rate during a time when interest rates were so low.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2009-05-11 09:45:45

They will do whatever it takes to keep housing unaffordable, so, yes, low interest rates in some form or another will exist to keep the toxic loan losers in their unaffordable McMansions.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Tim
2009-05-10 07:42:27

Make sure you are not relying on the 2007 Credit Suisse chart. It is outdated. The real trick is whether higher interest rates linked to inflation will occur sooner rather than later. If rates go up 2% or so in the short term, the problem will be magnified substantially.

Comment by Captain Credit Crunch
2009-05-10 11:50:43

I don’t think it matters that the chart is old. The only thing that’s different is that the second hump is compressed some because of recasting earlier than the reset.

The ALT-A people (second wave in the chart) are not going to get a “get-out-of-jail free” card because of low interest rates. They are already upside down and will not be able to get refinanced. They will have payment shock just like the first hump.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Tim
2009-05-10 07:31:44

I can tell you in Denver that the credit did in fact push up the bottom of the market up by more than the amount of the credit. So in summary, none is actually retained by the first time buyer. It goes directly to the speculator seller with some extra change, and encourages first time buyers to purchase at over inflated prices. Also, the credit gets phased out quickly at higher income levels. Thus, it is geared at lower income people, i.e. those least likely to have the skills to not lose any government windfall in the form of a tax credit or otherwise in the negotation process to the party on the other side of the table, and less likely to understand what they can or cannot afford, and the risks associated in the transaction.

Comment by drumminj
2009-05-10 09:24:04

I forget when the tax credit first became available (vs the tax rebate last year), but couldn’t some of the price rise be seasonal as well?

Comment by Tim
2009-05-10 09:48:47

The increased sales percentages and increase in prices, at least in Denver, is heavily concentrated in the 250k or less category, with homes in the higher brackets having inceased inventory and steeper discounts. This may not be totally limited to the credit (i.e., is in part a function of financing being harder to obtain), but the disparate impact bellies mere seasonal adjustment. As for further evidence, I know 5 people at work that have bought or are looking to buy this year because they want to get the credit. It’s a big deal for these ppl. They cant pass up a perceived bargain. I try to explain how can it be a bargain if the low interest rates and tax credit wont exist for the class of ppl you want to sell to in the future (i.e., for them to get the same deal they would have to offer you at 20% less in 2-3 years, thus, you are further down the appreciation chain), but it’s no use.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Tim
2009-05-10 09:56:06

bellies = belies

 
Comment by CA renter
2009-05-10 23:31:56

Heard the same here, from many people. They are buying because of the credit.

You are right, Tim. This is a gift to the seller. As a matter of fact, I’m convinced that almost ALL gifts/write-offs/deductions/etc. are for the sellers’ benefit, not the buyers’.

It would be great to see a market that is free of all this manipulative money. One can wish…

 
 
Comment by Tim
2009-05-10 10:05:57

As for the timing, it is effective as of January 1st and expires in November (most ppl with kids like to move in the Summer, so there is that seasonal adjustment to account for). Unlike last year’s rebate that was more like an interest free loan that had to be paid back, as long as you keep the house for 3 years, nothing has to be repaid, and it’s a refundable credit (i.e., if you dont have enough tax liability to offset, you get cut a check). It starts phasing out rapidly at an adjusted gross income of 75k single filer/150k joint.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-10 07:41:24

“That 8K in cash is certainly adding at least 40K to home prices (assuming 20% down/5 to 1 leverage), at least, IMHO.”

As long as you are into calculating the effects of temporary stimulus on home prices, could you try your hand at figuring out the impact of

- the mortgage interest deduction (which Obama has hinted he may want to eliminate going forward);

- the $500K capital gains exclusion (maybe not so much, now that home prices are generally falling);

- generational-low mortgage interest rates, which are likely to only go up from here (how much lower than a generational low can interest rates go)?

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-10 07:45:39

There is also one more thing to think about regarding the debt cat bounce in home prices, which takes the appearance of a leveling-off in the rate of decline, as prices were falling so fast before all these measures to artificially stimulate demand were put in place:

It is entirely conceivable that people who would have bought homes at some time over the next couple of years have been enticed into accelerating their purchases. If so, there is likely to be a lower number of end users (the fundamental source of housing demand) in the market for the next couple of years relative to what would have naturally occurred sans stimulus.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2009-05-10 07:51:57

Hey Mr. Bear, isn’t this just a fancy way to say that nearly everyone who took at an “over-priced” home loan between 2002-2009 is basically, what’s the word…screwed?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by polly
2009-05-10 08:22:32

Which, of course, leads to the move up crowd not being able to selll so the mid-range stuff doesn’t have a market, lather, rinse, repeat…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by SUGuy
2009-05-10 08:55:33

The thing that’s pretty funny is that my RE agent told me that she’s working with another couple that was looking at the same home and wanted to use the credit to buy it. Problem was, the home was 425K (requiring a ~150K in income to support), the other couple SHOULD be limited out of the credit if they can really afford that home, no?

Inmho it is the buyers who determines what a house is worth. There will be a great selection of decent houses coming on the market for several years. You could be a little kid running around the candy store trying to determine what to buy. So waiting is the best option. There will be plenty of deals around the corner. Sit back enjoy the show read hbb and send Ben some money for his efforts. As far as the 8K in credits is concerned I think its peanuts when buying a 425K house. It should not matter.

 
 
Comment by Frank Hague
2009-05-10 07:27:11

Obsessive Housing Disorder

http://www.city-journal.org/2009/19_2_homeownership.html

“In December, the New York Times published a 5,100-word article charging that the Bush administration’s housing policies had “stoked” the foreclosure crisis—and thus the financial meltdown. By pushing for lax lending standards, encouraging government enterprises to make mortgages more available, and leaning on private lenders to come up with innovative ways to lend to ever more Americans—using “the mighty muscle of the federal government,” as the president himself put it—Bush had lured millions of people into bad mortgages that they ultimately couldn’t afford, the Times said.”

“Yet almost everything that the Times accused the Bush administration of doing has been pursued many times by earlier administrations, both Democratic and Republican—and often with calamitous results. The Times’s analysis exemplified our collective amnesia about Washington’s repeated attempts to expand homeownership and the disasters they’ve caused. The ideal of homeownership has become so sacrosanct, it seems, that we never learn from these disasters. Instead, we clean them up and then—as if under some strange compulsion—set in motion the mechanisms of the next housing catastrophe.”

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2009-05-10 07:48:27

“…set in motion the mechanisms of the next housing catastrophe.” ;-)

Since we are now assigning gov’t debt to the “unknown” future…why not have “Uncle” Sam provide 14% guaranteed tax free passbook savings accounts up to $500,000?

Has to be better then making homes into deteriorating piggy banks…I’m just whacked I tell ya. ;-)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-10 07:48:55

“The ideal of homeownership has become so sacrosanct, it seems, that we never learn from these disasters. Instead, we clean them up and then—as if under some strange compulsion—set in motion the mechanisms of the next housing catastrophe.”

I agree it is wrong to pin the housing market disaster on W, though he certainly did go with the flow. We should thank the NAR for doing a great job of lobbying our politicians into supporting their industry in all sorts of foolish and financially destructive ways.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2009-05-10 08:01:42

“…NAR for doing a great job of lobbying our politicians into supporting their industry in all sorts of foolish and financially destructive ways.”

“Buy now..or be priced out forever!” …is “protected speech” under the US Constitution…however, “Set mortgage interest rates at 14%+!” most certainly qualifies as grounds for treason and perhaps death by 4×4 real estate sign post beating! ;-)

 
Comment by Frank Hague
2009-05-10 08:17:07

This disaster has so many authors it would take an encyclopedia to list them all. Also from that article:

“Any concern that regulators should tighten standards as the loan volume expanded was quickly dismissed. When in early 2000 the FDIC proposed increasing capital requirements for lenders making “subprime” loans—loans to people with questionable credit, that is—Democratic representative Carolyn Maloney of New York told a congressional hearing that she feared that the step would dry up CRA loans. Her fellow New York Democrat John J. LaFalce urged regulators “not to be premature” in imposing new regulations.”

I loved the title of the article because I think in many ways the obsession our political class has with subsidizing housing is a mental illness. It is not susceptible to reason or facts. We seem to be making many of the same mistakes that caused this mess in attempts to clean it up.

 
Comment by Bob in Vegas
2009-05-10 08:56:52

The housing market disaster is Greenscam’s baby. Greenscam’s low interest rates created the perception that the cost of borrowing was essentially free. “Free” money will fuel any bubble for awhile, until borrowers get hit with the fact that borrowing is not really free. We should also remember that Dr. Bernankenstein was one of Greenscam’s biggest cheerleaders, and is currently the fox in charge of the interest rate hen house.

We collectively forget that Fannie and Freddie were sidebar issues compared to Wall Street’s private sector mortgage securitization machine. That machine could never have come into being with lots of “free” money, courtesy of Greenscam.

If we are lucky, enough people will come to realize that homeownership is a huge liability, regardless of interest rates. If that happens (which is debatable), the people will not be easily fooled into trying to reflate the housing bubble.

Comment by Frank Hague
2009-05-10 09:25:04

While Greenspan and the Federal Reserve played a large role in this situation, it can’t solely be blamed on the Fed. Even with low interest rates, if lending standards had been maintained I don’t think things would have spiraled out of control the way they have. Our political class is determined to subsidize housing, that obsession is not a function of bad fed policy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by bluprint
2009-05-10 10:01:30

When resources are handed out for free (or below market rates), standards on how to allocate those resources also drops. Hence, lower lending standards was a result of free money.

Look at it like this, a bank can get endless supplies of money for nothing. Why wouldn’t they lower lending standards? At worse they lose something which didn’t cost them much anyway.

This isn’t rocket science. When people have to work hard for money, they are going to be more dilberate with regard to how they save/spend that money. On the other hand, when they get money for nothing (or very little) they won’t take care of it as well. You can frequently see this behavior in children typically, as well as lottery winners.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-10 15:43:06

“You can frequently see this behavior in children typically, as well as lottery winners.”

Spending other people’s money certainly does feel much different than spending the money that was earned by the sweat off your back.

 
Comment by CA renter
2009-05-10 23:38:17

Comment by bluprint
2009-05-10 10:01:30
When resources are handed out for free (or below market rates), standards on how to allocate those resources also drops. Hence, lower lending standards was a result of free money.

Absolutely, 100% correct!!!

You will rarely (if ever?) see loose lending practices when money is tight (and expensive/high interest rates).

They are very much correlated.

 
 
Comment by exeter
2009-05-10 10:09:42

No Greedscam, no Reagan, no Clinton… none of it.

OWNERSHIP SOCIETY

That’s right. It was the centerpiece of their domestic agenda as a means to buy more votes. Yet they didn’t spend a penny. It was the suckers who spent…. and spent…. and spent. And they got owned instead of becoming owners. What it really meant is an Onerous Society where wage earners took on burdens to enrich the real Owners of society. And doing NOTHING about the graft, fraud and criminal behavior of those running institutions like FNMAE, FMAC, HUD etc would counter their efforts at advancing their Ownership Society.

What more info?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ownership_society

Ownership society is a slogan for a model of society promoted by former United States President George W. Bush. It takes as lead values personal responsibility, economic liberty, and the owning of property. The ownership society discussed by Bush also extends to certain proposals of specific models of health care and social security.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Frank Hague
2009-05-10 12:18:07

You only have to read the thread that Ben has posted above this one to know that this problem is much deeper than the Bush Administration. I wish it were as simple as you suggest, but we have an entire generation of politicians that has bought into the fallacy the gov’t promotion and subsidies for housing are an economic positive.

 
Comment by exeter
2009-05-10 12:33:47

Frank,

I agree and we’ve gone over the genesis of this thing a thousand times on this blog. The seeds had already been planted. It was the fuel. The spark was the public policy that was entirely “Ownership society”. Basically it was a willingness to look the other way while the criminal activity took place.

 
Comment by Frank Hague
2009-05-10 12:59:50

I certainly don’t mean to suggest that the “ownership” society was not a large part of the problem. My point is that the mentality that created those policies still exists and still guides public policy. Yes, those policies were a disastrous failure, but evidently not bad enough to have them re-examined.

 
Comment by bluprint
2009-05-10 13:32:21

Ex, the “ownership society” helps explain one catalyst of how the bubble got into housing, but it doesn’t explain the bubble itself; for example, how did the bubble get into stocks first? (which led to the 2000 bust)

This is a macroeconomic monetary phenomenon first and a housing phenomenon second. Honestly, I am more interested in the macroecon/monetary aspect, mainly b/c it (macroecon and monetary policy in general) is just something I am interested in. But I also consider that to be the “root” problem and am not as interested in what particular form it manifests.

To your point however, there is a fair question to be asked as to whether the bubble was directed into RE deliberately. Presumably, the “ownership society” rhetoric and various policy changes that made loans for regular (rich and poor) folks easier are tools that would have been used if we do accept this conspiratorial consideration.

If we make this consideration, then we must also consider the possbility that it (the ownership society and supporting stuff over the past few adminstrations coming from DC) was a political coincidence and not part of a scheme to enslave the voting populace. You have to admit that “own your very own home” is politically popular, and politicians tend to latch on to things that get support of the drones.

Either way when the stock bubble busted that money (read: bubble) had to go somewhere. If not RE, then it would have been something else.

 
Comment by packman
2009-05-10 21:31:14

Being that the housing bubble started in about 1997, and the Ownership Society stuff started in 2003 - no, it’s not the only cause. It is a significant contributor, however.

 
Comment by rms
2009-05-10 23:30:00

“To your point however, there is a fair question to be asked as to whether the bubble was directed into RE deliberately.”

A popular theory: After the dot-com bubble burst and 9/11 attacks, the economy’s predicted growth rate was roughly 1% — not enough to get Dubya re-elected, so the plan to stimulate the economy with cash from home equity extraction was born. Well, here we are at intermission time, but there’s no cash or financing available for the buttered popcorn and frankfurters. The second half of show will be endured on an empty stomach.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-10 15:40:50

‘“Free” money will fuel any bubble for awhile,…’

Uh, don’t we have free money right now? Either the bubble is going to get reflated in the next little while, or we are going to have the crash of the century.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by mikey
2009-05-10 08:12:17

Don’t Let the Rain Come Down (Crooked Little Man)” by The Serendipity Singers

CHORUS
(Ah, ah) Oh, no, don’t let the rain come down
(Ah, ah) Oh, no, don’t let the rain come down
(Ah, ah) Oh, no, don’t let the rain come down
My roof’s got a hole in it and I might drown
Oh, yes, my roof’s got a hole in it and I might drown
There was a crooked man and he had a crooked smile
Had a crooked sixpence and he walked a crooked mile
Had a crooked cat and he had a crooked mouse
They all lived together in a crooked little house

CHORUS

Well, this crooked little man and his crooked little smile
Took his crooked sixpence and he walked a crooked mile
Bought some crooked nails and a crooked little bat
Tried to fix his roof with a rat-tat-tat-tat-tat

CHORUS

Now this crooked little man and his crooked cat and mouse
They all live together in a crooked little house
Has a crooked door with a crooked little latch
Has a crooked roof with a crooked little patch
CHORUS

CHORUS

(Ah, ah) Oh, no, don’t let the rain come down
(Ah, ah) Oh, no, don’t let the rain come down
(Ah, ah) Oh, no, don’t let the rain come down
My roof’s got a hole in it (my roof’s got a hole in it)
My roof’s got a hole in it and I might drown

And some realtywhore is trying to sell it as a $500k “Starter home” in California.
:)

 
 
Comment by Fresno Dude
2009-05-10 07:32:58

I bought a house in Eau Claire, Wisconsin. This last week, drove by 25 places, looked at 12, decided to by a place with half an acre lot, had another look, noted siding and driveway would need replacement, walked away since I was sure I could not get it for 80% of appraised value because it is a fixer upper, and bought another place with half the acreage. It was $182,000 for a four bedroom in a nice area. My wife was just frantic if I did not buy because she is so fed up with the insecurity of renting, not knowing when we would have to move again if the landlord wanted to sell. Anyway, maybe the $8,000 first time home buyer tax refund will be enough to offset further price declines, but I am not convinced. Slightly more than half the homes purchased will get the tax rebate; I think that was from Market Watch. I checked the Bureau of Labor statistics for Eau Claire and seen unemployment go from 4% to 8.7% over four months. I checked with the sheriff’s office and auctions are running about 25 per month for the last six months, but I would think would increase as people loose their homes because of unemployment. At least it is not as bad as Fresno at 17% unemployment as of March. Eau Claire County has about 100,000 people. Prices in Wisconsin have declined about 10%. I think interest rates will remain low because the Federal Government has to keep home prices as high as possible to promote recovery, but think prices will sink again after the first time home buyers have had their go at buying homes.

The house we are renting right now was in escrow on a short sale with a little more than 50% decline in price, but there was some complication with the title search. We originally had a handshake deal that we could stay until July 15 since he would have to give us 60 days notice here in California, as there is a new law about foreclosures and renters. He originally thought he would close May 8th. Looks like it will be back on the market and we will have to go through the hassle of showing the house again, but maybe not with the title search problem.

Comment by hip in zilker
2009-05-10 09:13:46

Congratulations, Fres. I remember the Eau Claire area as really beautiful - nice for bike riding, cross country skiing. And, as many here have mentioned, being in or near a college town is ideal for retirement.

You’re retiring to there, as I recall. Right?

Comment by hip in zilker
2009-05-10 09:15:48

You’ll be close to Red Wing MN too - lovely place.

Comment by rms
2009-05-10 23:31:21

Are the folks there barefoot?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Fresno Dude
2009-05-10 09:49:02

Yes, retire end of June, arrive in Eau Claire around July 14th.

Comment by aNYCdj
2009-05-10 11:02:31

Talk about a radical change from 110 in summer to minus 30 below in winter….

Good luck….But since you are going to be retired soon I’ll bet the wifey will nag you next year into BUYING a warmer winter home….LOL
——————————————————-
Yes, retire end of June, arrive in Eau Claire around July 14th.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Fresno Dude
2009-05-10 21:08:13

I also have a 5th wheel trailer, so we could be snow birds if it gets too cold, but my wife grew up on Ohio and I in Spokane so cold weather is something we have experienced.

 
Comment by CA renter
2009-05-10 23:43:58

Congratulations, Fresno Dude! :)

That’s going to be a change from Fresno, but hopefully, a very pleasant one.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2009-05-10 07:38:40

O.K., yesterday I took Mr. Cole to LA Union Station for the May 9th National Train Day…we had lunch at Phillipe’s…wonderful day, lots of people.

I was walking around thinking that the NAR really ought to do some serious demographic profiling…mostly older folks with grand children, and they were spending the greenbacks…perhaps build nice little 1400 sf homes @ $105,000 with cactus /rock gardens near the railroad tracks in small friendly communities…like say…Flagstaff! ;-)

Comment by Fresno Dude
2009-05-10 08:22:39

Maybe, I am moving to Eau Claire because of the grandchildren, and there is an awful lot of inventory, and I think more foreclosures on the way. Also, I am leaving a rental and that becomes another place needing an occupant. We need more immigrants with lots of money.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2009-05-10 09:27:12

“…We need more immigrants with lots of money.” ;-)

Honestly, last Thursday…there was a “25 something” asian kid with sunglasses on acting very nervous standing in line behind me at a grocery store bank line…he goes to the window next to me and out of a crumpled grocery store plastic bag pulls a taped stack of new hundred dollars bills…if were a cop, I think I’d follow him home. :-)

 
Comment by skroodle
2009-05-10 10:11:02

Give me your tired, your wealthy,
Your huddled masses yearning to buy real estate,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.

-The Really New Colossus

 
 
Comment by Big V
2009-05-10 10:20:55

Yesterday was National Train Day? And I forgot to send a gift, shucks.

Comment by polly
2009-05-10 10:33:20

It was also Public Service Recognition Week this week. Local coverage made it sound like half the world was on the Mall applying for jobs. I think you could also meet an astronaut and pick up a free coloring book. And one of the military rock bands was performing.

Comment by Big V
2009-05-10 11:20:08

Meet an astronaut? NO WAY! Do they wear diapers to these things? I’m fascinated by this.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by polly
2009-05-10 15:49:06
 
Comment by Big V
2009-05-10 16:26:29

I didn’t see anyone in diapers. Dumb.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by iftheshoefits
2009-05-10 08:15:01

Finally, the Salt Lake condo glut that I’ve mentioned here numerous times is starting to get noticed:

http://money.sltrib.com/story.asp?ID=3380223

I thought it was interesting that even in a story where only realtors and developers were quoted, it’s still pretty downbeat. Although there is no mention of the new condo buildings sitting mostly vacant across many parts of the valley.

The Sugarhouse area that the article focuses on is where I stay whenever I’m up working in SL, like I am now. The sad thing about Sugarhouse is that, while it’s a great revitalized living/shopping district, very convenient and walkable, there is a real shortage of condo living space within practical walking distance of the center Commons area. If you have to drive to the commons, traffic and parking is a mess.

But all the developers want to build are these ultra-expensive, edgy, “new urbanist” monstrosities at $300/sq. ft. So in locations where there could be some more reasonable living units, instead there are holes in the ground, old run-down buildings supposedly destined for renovation, or expensive finished projects sitting vacant. Sigh.

 
Comment by django316
2009-05-10 09:59:34

I have a friend who makes a few million a year that has a $2 million house in his wifes name with all the equity sucked out to start his business which is thriving. When I they told him how the banks are willing to renegoiate loans because they are shitting in their pants he workrd out a new deal with them —-Drumroll——– They offered him 1% fixed for 5 years and then variable. He is a hard ngotiator and is pushing for 1% for 10 year fixed. He was joking witht the loan guy that his house payment should be less than his Bentley Payment. Atleast some people are benefiting from this screwjob for the rest of us. I have a paid up house and he was feeling srry for me fr paying it off. LOL!

Comment by Big V
2009-05-10 10:23:07

If he took out equity, it’s recourse, hun. He’s full of it.

 
Comment by Muir
2009-05-10 11:42:08

“They offered him 1% fixed for 5 years and then variable. He is a hard ngotiator and is pushing for 1% for 10 year fixed. ”

He’s smarter than most of us.

1% fixed for 10 years in an inflationary environment!?
In this topsy world, he may be right in feeling sorry for you.

Then again, he may be a masochist (with the blood sucking wife.)

But his fixed 1% for 10 years, that is not dumb.

 
 
Comment by tresho
2009-05-10 10:38:23

The company behind world’s cheapest car will sell $7,800 apartments.
Tata, the Indian company that made worldwide headlines with its $2,000 Nano car, now plans to build 1,000 tiny apartments outside Mumbai that will sell for $7,800 to $13,400 each. These apartments will be absolutely tiny. The carpeted area of the smallest units will be 218 square feet, too small even for most Manhattanites. The largest units would be about 373 square feet.

Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2009-05-10 13:29:00

From the link:

“The average call center employee with 10 to 20 years experience earns 320,000 rupees or about $6,400 a year. ”

Man, are we going to get so whacked up side the head with inflation.

Comment by skroodle
2009-05-10 15:53:51

There were no Indian call centers in 1989.

Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2009-05-10 16:17:19

They lied on their own domestic job applications too?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by yensoy
2009-05-10 19:37:07

No, they counted overtime

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by tresho
2009-05-10 10:55:00

NY Times: Congress has abdicated It’s been obvious for over a year. The only thing our honorable /spit/ representatives stand for is re-election.

 
Comment by B. Durbin
2009-05-10 14:50:06

We closed on our house on Friday (yay!) but we won’t get the keys until next week (…? yay?) We join the ranks of homeloaners! (heheheh.) It’s a good, long-established neighborhood, and the house is one that was passed over for months in our quick-moving market* (though prices are still dropping like a rock.) That’s because it’s ugly, peeling wallpaper, older house, and so on.**

But all those buyers for the new subdivisions… what will their neighborhoods be like in the next few years? Especially someplace like Elk Grove, with its insane rate of growth over the last few years. Those people have to go somewhere… but it may not be Elk Grove. I’d bet a lot of those newer subdivisions end up in the unhappy situation of having lots of vacancies, along with the associated problems.

*The quick movers are ALL foreclosures, FWIW. The local banks have caught on and are underpricing the non-foreclosures by $25K to $75K, maybe more. A lot of those go back on the market when the deal falls through, though.

**Thus desireable for us. The inspection was golden, and the roof’s new. A lot of the places that went pending sale within days had obvious maintenance issues but were painted pretty. We can do our own pretty painting.

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-10 19:54:45

We can do our own pretty painting.

Yar! Think how much fun you shall have arguing over various shades…a festival of delights, surely. *chortle *

Plus, older houses are good houses. I got no faith in quickly slapped-up ticky-tacky McPastel structures.

But now you must tell us about where you’re going to put the garden, and more about the big pine tree, and what the wind smells like.

Comment by B. Durbin
2009-05-10 20:37:46

The garden goes on the south side of the house, because the tomatoes need their sun. And I’m assuming that the various and sundry chilies need that fire for their fire, too.

I’ll have to get back to you about the big pine because I need to take out some bushes that are eating the backyard before I can get close to it, but it’s healthy and doesn’t appear to be a redwood (which is a good thing; redwoods shouldn’t be planted in the Sacramento Valley.)

The wind is actually quite nice. The Delta Breeze is what keeps Sacramento from being 100+ degrees all summer long, like Redding. We’re far enough inland that it doesn’t smell of the ocean where it originates, but instead of the land it has passed over. That changes through the year from the freshness of spring to a more complex version of ripening crops. And when there’s no breeze, the scent of baking earth and wild grasses is one of those things that says “home” to me– and is distinctly different from the baked smell of the decomposed granite and valley oaks of the foothills.

Oh yeah, the valley oaks. I should be pushing those instead of the pines– they’re protected, which means the Sacramento Tree Foundation has been planting a bunch of mitigation seedlings to account for the recent development… but that’s mostly for the smaller ones. At least the developers are smart enough to realize that if the trunk is three feet or more in diameter, they should build around it and tout it as a feature.

If you ever come down, make sure to take a detour and head up the American River Parkway, nearly thirty miles of bike trail and parks going up the river. There’s enough local wildlife that an evening walk nets you at least half a dozen large varieties (including water fountain sleeves full of frogs and potential cougar hazards) and there’s still signs of the Gold Rush if you know what you’re looking at.

*sigh* It is truly a shame that Evil Rob is very heat-sensitive and has bad knees. I need a hiking companion.

Comment by CA renter
2009-05-10 23:57:21

Congratulations, B. Durbin! :)

Sounds like a great home.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-10 16:09:10

Is anyone out there in blog land looking for a foreclosure home to purchase in the $9,000,000+ price range?

While some economists see green shoots, all I see is a persistent avalanche of foreclosures on the high end of the market, that will crush the price distribution of everything of lesser quality in the surrounding area. I cannot overstate how awestruck I am by the force of this collapse.

Case in point: According to ziprealty dot com, there are currently 313 homes listed for the Rancho Santa Fe with a median list price of $3,349,000. But why would one bother looking at any of these, when there are also nearly 200 foreclosure homes on the market (according to ForeclosureTown dot com), soon to be if not already priced at fire sale levels (and I am not being metaphorical here)? Anyone with lots of dough available to purchase real estate right now could make an absolute killing if they timed their purchases right and drove a hard bargain.

I am guessing members of Megabank, Inc are going to plow TARP money they have stashed under the proverbial mattress into this segment of the market once they are convinced that it has bottomed out, but with the gauntlet of Alt-A and prime resets on tap through 2011, there is quite a bit more of a foreclosure avalanche ahead before any bottom is in sight.

Here is the top end of the ForeclosureTown dot com listings for Rancho Santa Fe, 92067. It truly amazes me how so many homes owned by people who thought they were sufficiently wealthy to own properties valued at $10,000,000+ are currently flooding the foreclosure market at the worst possible time.

P.S. I asked my wife to guess the highest priced foreclosure listed in Rancho Santa Fe. Her guess (no kidding!): $14,000,000. I am lucky to be married to a very smart woman (and a great mom).

Address / Property Type / Beds / Baths / Price
FORTUNA DEL ESTE
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 5 7 $9,250,000

EL SENTIDO
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 6 7 $9,250,000

THE RIVER TRAIL
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 5 6 $9,400,000

ALYDAR CORTE
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 6 11 $9,800,000

ALYDAR CORTE
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 6 11 $9,800,000

ALYDAR CORTE
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 6 11 $9,800,000

LAS PLANIDERAS
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 6 9 $9,900,000

BELLA SIENA
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 5 6 $10,800,000

LOMA LINDA DR
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 7
7
$10,950,000
Close
Address
Property Type
Beds
Baths
Price
LOMA LINDA DR.
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 7 10 $10,950,000

VIA DE SANTA FE
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 7 7 $11,850,000

VIA DE SANTA FE
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 5 9 $11,900,000

LOMA LINDA DR
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 7 10 $11,950,000

LOMA LINDA DR
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 7 7 $11,950,000

PASEO HERMOSA
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 6
6
$13,500,000
Close
Address
Property Type
Beds
Baths
Price
FORTUNA DEL ESTE
RANCHO SANTA FE , CA
92067
For Sale by Broker 6 8 $14,000,000

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-10 17:41:40

ForeclosureTown dot com shows 12+ pages (240+ homes) of foreclosure listings for our zip code, Rancho Bernardo West, 92127, and 1269 foreclosure listings within the 10 mile vicinity of 92127. Listings from the end of the range are shown below, with many listed as “bankruptcy”:

Address
Property Type Beds Baths Price
CAMINITO SANTALUZ NORTE
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 4 4 $1,995,000

SENDERO ANGELICA
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 4 4 $2,200,000

ENTRADA DE LUZ WEST
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 5 5 $2,365,000

RUN OF THE KNOLLS
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 5 5 $2,395,000

DOUG HILL
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 4 4 $2,480,000

PLEIN AIRE
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 5 5 $2,495,000

COCONUT GR
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 4 5 $2,795,000

ILUMINADO
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 5 4 $2,799,990

RUN OF THE KNOLLS
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 4 5 $2,850,000

RUN OF THE KNOLLS
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 4 7 $2,895,000

RUN OF THE KNOLLS
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 4 7 $2,895,000

SANTALUZ VILLAGE GREEN EAST
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 4 4 $3,295,000

PLEIN AIRE
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 5 7 $3,595,000

VILLAS
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 5 6 $3,675,000

PLEIN AIRE
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 5 7 $3,695,000

DOUG HILL
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 5 5 $3,795,000

DOUG HILL
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 5 6 $3,995,000

SANTALUZ POINTE
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
For Sale by Broker 5 6 $4,195,000

GARDEN PATH DR
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
Bankruptcy * * Must Call

CAMINITO BAYA
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
Bankruptcy * * Must Call

ALVA RD
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
Bankruptcy * *

ALVA RD
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
Bankruptcy * *

ALVA RD
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
Bankruptcy * * Must Call

ALVA RD
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
Bankruptcy * * Must Call

SIENNA HILLS DR
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
Bankruptcy * *

CAMINITO LAZANJA
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127
Bankruptcy * *

WINECREEK CT
SAN DIEGO , CA
92127

Comment by CA renter
2009-05-11 00:05:10

Looks like you guys are in a much better place than we are.

Our inventory is LOW, and **multiple** bids on most homes that are priced anywhere near reasonable levels. Prices are still pretty flat at 2003/2004 levels (or more!).

It’s 2004 all over again! :(

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-10 16:11:05

“…(though prices are still dropping like a rock.)”

Why would anyone who understands Economics 1 purchase any high-valued, lumpy, long-lived capital asset when prices are dropping like a rock? I am mystified by this phenomenon.

Comment by B. Durbin
2009-05-10 20:52:41

Long discourse here, but upshot is that we’re planning on keeping this lump for a couple of decades, so there’s other factors going into this decision.

Place we like, price we can comfortably afford (in line with fundamentals), good neighborhood. Eh. Let you know if we go broke. :D

 
 
Comment by AbsoluteBeginner
2009-05-10 17:07:00

I got a rock.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-10 17:07:31

Well, it’s 5 pm here in the PNW and I wish a ‘Happy Mother’s Day’ to all HBB moms! Who, I have no doubt of it, are surely superior mothers, what with the being all smart and wise and perceptive and prudent and such. Yes, the HBB moms are all, to a one, probably Ten-Cow women.*

(Now I’m gonna go read all the posts, and then I’m gonna come back and complain about MY mom, and then I’m gonna to call my mom, and, fueled by regret at having dished on her flaws, will be extra sweet and not say even one sassy thing, strain me though this will. Hahahaah!)

*That’s from ‘Johnny Lingo’. Possibly the best movie ever made. (See, there’s this guy in a loin-cloth on an island, and he makes his chick Mahani be suddenly beautiful and less grouchy simply by the exercise of his faith and by bringing over 10 cows to her dad.)

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-10 17:26:15

LDS cultural reference:

“Mohana, you ugly.”

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-10 17:43:52

Hahahaaha! Oh, thanks, PB. I see you know it.
But how? Did you, too, see it as a youth? How is this?

I don’t even know how many times I saw ‘Johnny Lingo’ in echoey Utarr elementary and secondary school gymnasiums, seated in plastic chairs we dutifully carried in from class and laid out in uneven rows before the big white unscrolled screen. There we were, a bunch of pale-skin pioneer descendants sitting there watching the implausible and fantastical tropical greenery and all that water and the lightly clothed brown-skin islanders, flickering and with sudden starts and stops (they were old projectors). While outside the sun baked down and cottonwoods waved lightly in the hot wind.

You know what?! I got a copy of ‘Johnny Lingo!’ I can watch it anyyyyy time I want to, nowadays. :)

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-10 19:19:51

I have not seen that one, though my wife has filled me in on some of the more memorable lines.

I am, however, a big fan of Napoleon Dynamite.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-10 17:46:04

How long do roasted coffee beans in vacuum pack stay fresh? I am thinking of buying up my one-year supply of coffee, in keeping with the LDS faith’s food storage policy…

Financial Times
Shortages stir coffee and sugar prices
By Javier Blas and Jenny Wiggins in London
Published: May 10 2009 22:30 | Last updated: May 10 2009 22:30

Caffeine addicts face higher prices for their daily fix as the wholesale cost of both coffee and sugar rise sharply because of poor crops and robust demand.

“We are in a dangerous situation,” Andrea Illy, chief executive of Italy’s leading coffee ­company, told the Financial Times, warning that prices could “explode” due to supply shortages.

Comment by yensoy
2009-05-10 19:35:38

Put it in the freezer. Helps keep it fresh

Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-05-10 19:48:25

Thanks for the tip.

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-10 20:36:16

But then I heard that the freeziness sucks out the coffee volatile oils to ill effect on the flavor?
It’s hard to know.
*puts on thinky face *

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by B. Durbin
2009-05-11 14:03:29

Buy it unroasted. It keeps longer. And fresh-roasted is best anyways.

Weird thing is, I don’t drink coffee, but I know a lot about what makes good coffee.

 
 
 
 
Comment by calex
2009-05-11 04:11:54

Oh no…its coffee and sugars turn. Last year it was peak oil to $200 and beyond, the year before that it was corn, soy, and wheat. Oh the humanity, how will the world eat.

Get your widgets I heard their is a shortage of those planned for later this year by the paid for analyst at CNBC and MSNBC.

These people should be taken out back and shot. Bill their families for the bullets.

 
 
Comment by MelodyOfLove
2009-05-10 17:49:18

I Bought an Expensive House. My Bad, Not Yours

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1881581,00.html?imw=Y&loomia_si=t0:a16:g2:r1:c0.137984:b24358990&xid=Loomia

If people would admit to this and take their pain, we wouldn’t be in such a mess.

Comment by rms
2009-05-10 23:44:18

“A lot of optimistic people bought houses near the historic height of the market, say November 2005, for absurdly high prices, say $1.12 million, in places like the eastern Hollywood Hills section of Los Angeles.”

November 2005 was certainly noteworthy on this blog!

 
 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-05-10 19:27:50

Train Day 2009
We took the Los Angeles Metro subway system to downtown L A (Union Station) for the festivities yesterday. What a hoot. We had no idea the subway was so great and went in so many directions. Clean, modern, and $1.25 one way. Nice to see our tax dollars going towards something smart.

Comment by CA renter
2009-05-11 00:09:24

Did you see Hwy there? :)

 
 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-05-10 19:29:53

National Train Day May 9th, 2009 - annual event

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post