May 17, 2009

Bits Bucket For May 17, 2009

Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here. Please visit the HBB Forum. And see the American Visionaries series from Schwarzfilm.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

306 Comments »

Comment by Muir
2009-05-17 06:48:40

Good Morning!

Comment by Muggy
2009-05-17 07:09:31

Good day, my fellow Floridian!

Thank you for the morning star link.

Duh question: why do I need a margin account for SEF, but not FAZ, SKF et. al. (the lovely dark side :smile:)

Comment by Muir
2009-05-17 07:26:05

“Duh question: why do I need a margin account for SEF, but not FAZ, SKF et. al.”

SEF shouldn’t be a problem if you trade FAZ, SKF etc. Ypu may be reading that “special margin requirements” are required or something like that, but if you traded FAZ then I can’t see where they would not let you trade SEF.

The “simple” shorts; SEF, SH, make an intermediate/long term bet playable. Of course, it’s more “manly” to play the “ultra” and 3x stuff, but for us Vanity Fair readers that remain unthreatened about our sexuality, that shouldn’t be a problem.

(p.s. I did a FL “update” on bits yesterday, maybe I’ll do part2 today)

Comment by Muggy
2009-05-17 07:34:59

Thank you, sir.

I got lucky, I honestly did not understand the “decay” associated with SKF when I bought it. I have some penciling out to do today.

I did understand that 2x in a good way, also means 2x in a bad way (kinda like dating crazy women).

(*ponders plate before him, and burning feeling in hand)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Muggy
2009-05-17 07:40:48

Uh oh,

8 Ball, is Muggy going to lose hi a$$ on SKF?

“Outlook not so good”

*Party advice only

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 09:49:44

Hahahah! Funny!

Ahhh, I recall when you first whisked out the Magic 8-ball around Easter time, that was very comical.
It made me run and fetch my Magical Plastic Arby’s Oven Mitt with perky blue eyes and a chipper grin.
Although IIIII no longer follow the advice of the Oracular Oven Mitt, because it ordered me to stop gobbling so much ham. That’s the craziest advice I ever heard!

But your Magic 8-ball—that’s probably the genuine article, for sure…

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Rancher
2009-05-17 06:52:59

Espresso time!

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 09:57:35

You like your coffee, doncha, Rancher? You mention it often, with love and exclamation points, is why I suspect this.

And now, in a sign of PNW HBB solidarity, I shall go make some espresso this very minute as well, and sing a Pacific Northwesty sort of song while I brew it, about lumberjacks or barges.
I got the beans from the Grotlet, some bizarro flavor in a little burlap bag, and the espresso machine at an estate sale, new, because the lady never used it as she didn’t like coffee — what a crazy person—and I’ll drink from my favorite mug, which is blue with ivory insides and a brown rim.

 
Comment by hip in zilker
2009-05-17 10:07:41

Only Turkish coffee chez hip.

Comment by Crash and Burn
2009-05-17 11:34:14

I’m afraid I must disagree with you. Must have been seven or eight years ago but a friend that owns our local coffee shop gave me a handfull of young coffee plants. I found a soft spot on my rocky property, planted them, and drip lined them, and let them grow.

Three years ago I got my first cherries. Last week I wandered out, and my trees are over head high and loaded with fruit. Red ripe fruit. Off of one plant I got a 5 gallon bucket of cherries. Took me 3 hours to denude the plant of ripe fruit. I still have 7 more plants to pick. When those plants are done I go back to the first plant and pick the green cherries that have since ripened.

Last year I sent some off as Christmas presents. It went over well and I have many requests for more this year. From the looks of this crop everybody on the mainland will be getting coffee for Christmas. I should have enough left over to keep my own pot full until next year.

Maui coffee is a mild cup with light taste and very low acidity. It also has a big caffene kick too.

All the coffee we can drink and not wondering what to get the family for christmas makes it VERY hip in my book. The fact that it is all free is just icing on the cake.

Comment by Rancher
2009-05-17 13:16:45

Wondering if a hybrid type of coffee could
grow here on the mainland? Thoughts?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by L. Opine
2009-05-17 15:22:32

I’d like to know too–any coffee variety that stands a chance in Bay Area weather? (I don’t think so, but I’m no agronomist)

 
Comment by Reddy Watt
2009-05-17 15:39:21

The mainland just doesn’t have what it takes to grow good coffee commercially. A year round temp of 59-75ºF and lots of rain are required. The Robusta variety could probably grow in our warmer regions with irrigation, but Robusta isn’t very good by itself and the low selling price wouldn’t be profitable.

Tom over at sweetmarias dot com has tried to grow some in Oakland, CA. I never heard any success stories though.

 
Comment by Crash and Burn
2009-05-18 03:57:39

Sorry it took me so long to reply. Reddy is right. The mainland just does not have the climate. I have heard of Robusta grown as an ornimental shrub in the San Diego area. After a rain the coffee flowers are pretty.

Oly? Envy? Oly if you get into my neck of the woods I would happily give you a bucket and turn you loose. I can’t offer you frogs but I will find a buffo just for you. Please do not lick the buffo.

 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 14:21:09

Three years ago I got my first cherries. Last week I wandered out, and my trees are over head high and loaded with fruit. Red ripe fruit. Off of one plant I got a 5 gallon bucket of cherries. Took me 3 hours to denude the plant of ripe fruit. I still have 7 more plants to pick…

Oh, lookit me. I’m getting to experience one of the 7 Big-Time Capital Vices for the very first time!
‘Envy’.
I wondered how that felt, and now I know. Maybe a nice fresh cup of coffee will cure me…
:)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by hip in zilker
2009-05-17 17:20:26

Growing your own coffee is WAY cool. I’d love to be harvesting my own!

My argument for Turkish coffee is for the style of making it - as they do in Turkey, Egypt, Lebanon. (We use Yemeni beans.)

Although Turkish coffee has a similar consistency to expresso, it is made differently. You boil water with sugar, add fine ground coffee w/ cardomom ground in, hold it over the fire so that the bottom part of the pear-shaped pot is bubbling - but you stir the top so that it doesn’t boil over. Three times you let it bubble up but raise it from the fire so it doesn’t boil over. Then you take it off the fire and let it sit a few minutes with a saucer on top so that the grounds settle.

I prefer it to expresso myself, although expresso seems to have pretty much overtaken the market in coffee shops and restaurants in the Middle East.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by speedingpullet
2009-05-17 18:12:59

I love it too - if I want to have a sensual memory of the Mediterranean, I have a cup of Turkish coffee.

That, and the smell of sage and rosemary bushes in the hot sun, remind me of my youth and my various travels there.

 
 
Comment by jim a
2009-05-17 17:38:21

When my sister came back from visiting friends in Bolivia, she brought back a bunch of photos, including some of the family roasting their own coffee, something fairly common among the middle class there. Picture a small cement mixer with a flame underneath.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by hip in zilker
2009-05-17 18:39:27

In the African village I have been visiting over the years, they begin the morning with milky tea after dawn prayers.

Then the ladies roast coffee in a metal frying pan over a sorghum stalk fire (or recently over a butagas 2-ring stove), smoking up the kitchen (the roof beams rest on the top of the walls, so the smoke goes out). If a guest comes in, the ladies offer the pan of roasting coffee, so that the guest can waft the smoke into their face. Then the ladies pound the coffee in a wooden mortar with a brass pestle, beating out a nice rhythm. Then they cook the coffee - more like “cowboy coffee” than Turkish coffee, put it in a hot pot thermos and serve in little cups. They used to serve it from little pear-shaped pottery pots, but times have changed.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 19:33:44

Thank you, zilky.

 
 
Comment by Mot
2009-05-17 17:41:07

Juan Valdez!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2009-05-17 11:09:07

Yesterday I picked up the New Homes Guide at the Rosslyn Metro stop in Northern VA. They are screaming that it’s a great time to buy because interest rates are low, prices are down, and we can’t forget that $8000 tax credit. Of course, prices are still north of $200 K for a condo miles away from downtown…

 
 
Comment by Muir
Comment by Zombie Banks
2009-05-17 07:07:22

Muir, john adams is on the phone. he says don’t tread on me!

 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-05-17 07:27:48

Hmmm, when have I heard that argument before?

 
Comment by cobaltblue
2009-05-17 07:36:31

No, since 1913 the U.S. system has been corporatism sponsored by and for the Federal Reserve, a private international banking cartel.

Private interest was supplanted by oligarchic or monopolistic interests at that point.

To give you a present day example, the TAXPAYERS are now being burdened with the PRIVATE BANKERS’ losses. “Privatize the gains but socialize the losses” is not capitalism. But it is what we have now.

Comment by Muir
2009-05-17 08:02:47

I was REALLY hoping someone would say something like this.
You didn’t go to the link.

___

“If you’ve ever had the fortune of idly debating economic systems with a Marxist or a real, honest-to-god communist, you probably had the part of the conversation where you point out all the failures of communism (Russia, Cuba, Angola, etc.) and they respond with: “Yes, but, those weren’t real communist systems, those were bastardizations of the ideal.”

That’s kind of a tough line to refute — cause how can it be disproved — except that if every time we mortal humans try communism it utterly fails, what different does it make if some perfect, non-human aliens can make it work?

It turns out, the tables have turned, and it’s the self-proclaimed free market economies that are in the death spiral, done in by their own excesses.

Of course, this can’t be an indictment of capitalism. Cause after all, America doesn’t have real capitalism.

No, see, we don’t have capitalism, we have corporatism (aha!). Or they say, how can you call our system capitalist, when we have a Federal Reserve, which sets the price of money. Or, how can you call it capitalism when the financial sector has thoroughly captured the public sector.

Once again, it’s the same non-disprovable line of logic that your communist friend used on you in college, and it’s no more valid.”

__

HA!

Comment by cobaltblue
2009-05-17 08:09:52

HA! HA! Are you saying there IS NO Fed controlling the currency, interest rates, markets, and politicians???

Or that you find it personally convenient to extend a straw man argument?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-05-17 08:23:09

It’s been asked here before, and it doubtlessly go will unanswered again — where in history can this idealized, truly unfettered capitalism be located?

No, since 1913 the U.S. system has been corporatism … Private interest was supplanted by oligarchic or monopolistic interests at that point.

Are you claiming that the pre-1913 era was free of oligarchic or monopolistic interests? Ha ha ha …

 
Comment by Muir
2009-05-17 08:24:25

I’m saying:

1. You were too lazy to read the article.
2. Using your logic, Castro’s Cuba, the USSR and China were neither Socialist nor Communist.

 
Comment by Muir
2009-05-17 09:22:23

ET-Chicago,

“It’s been asked here before, and it doubtlessly go will unanswered again — where in history can this idealized, truly unfettered capitalism be located?”

__

Well said.
I’ll give it a shot.

ET, except in a bordello in New Mexico or in pre-Castro Cuba, I can’t think of any.
Though, to be fair, there are, or were, government regulations by the Health Dept in both.

Which goes to my strong opinion that a well run, government supervised bordello is a cleaner and more respectful place than Wall Street ever was.

 
Comment by InMontana
2009-05-17 09:54:03

Looks like the bastardization of the term “corporatism” is permanent…

 
 
Comment by oxide
2009-05-17 09:17:36

I would say that unfettered capitalism depends more on the availability of unfettered competition and unfettered meritocracy than it does on unfettered money.

Maybe evolution is the closest thing to capitalism.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by az_lender
2009-05-17 09:38:17

And socialism tries to prevent evolution from taking its course. One does not have to be FOR social Darwinism to admit that democratic political institutions tend to lead towards a situation where all kinds of weaknesses are supported.

 
Comment by oxide
2009-05-17 10:23:17

I’m not sure. One could argue that socialism tries to allow for social Darwinist evolution to take its course. For example, there may be a kid out there who is smart and talented and would make it far in life. But you would never know it because the kid’s parents were utter losers (or black :???: ) and the kid never got decent nutrition or a chance to sit in a gun-free classroom. Meanwhile, there are some real Darwinist losers who, left on their own, would drink themselves to death. But you would never know it, because the kid’s parents had old money and sent the kid to Yale on Daddy’s name for a gentleman’s C.

This is part of the “unfettered meritocracy” argument. Unfettered competition is another issue, which complicates it even further.

In the end, the only workable system is a constant tug-of-war between capitalism and socialism. At the moment, socialism appears to be winning.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 10:47:11

“Or, how can you call it capitalism when the financial sector has thoroughly captured the public sector.”

I guess that pretty much sums up why the American economy is chronically ill?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 10:48:12

– with cancer in the form of financial sector malignancy –

 
 
 
Comment by lainvestorgirl
2009-05-17 10:50:23

I am astonished how quickly our once great republic is descending into a banana republic.

We have Obama and his thugs threatening Chrysler bondholders into accepting a deal that abrogates their contractual rights.

We have Hank Paulson/Bush threatening the CEO of Bank of America into bailing out Merrill Lynch (this CEO was replaced after he went public with this information).

We have Michelle Obama openly stating that “service to others is the rent you pay for your life” at a college graduation ceremony, while her husband has advocated mandatory national service for college aged citizens.

We have the president threatening the State of California that it will lose its share of the stimulus money if it cuts the pay of union workers in order to help balance its budget.

Now that the banks and carmakers are controlled by the federal government, and the states basically are too because of federal power to withhold funds…Obama now wants to take over our medical industry as well?

Where is the outrage?

Jews in Germany learned the hard way that sitting passively while tyranny grows does not result in security or liberty. I fear that Americans are about to learn the same lesson.

Comment by L. Opine
2009-05-17 14:48:46

Let me get this straight. You’re equating Jews in Germany with the American people, and Obama with Hitler. That LA sun must be emitting some serious brain-melting radiation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Muir
2009-05-17 16:25:14

It’s the paraquat.

 
Comment by hip in zilker
2009-05-17 17:23:05

I’ll remember not to wear my tinfoil hat if I ever go to LA.

 
Comment by EastBayRenter
2009-05-17 18:23:28

Wake up people!!! She’s RIGHT and it’s on BOTH sides of the aisle!!

 
Comment by EastBayRenter
2009-05-17 18:27:43

Check out this goodie put in place by GWB - The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP). This puts in place the framework for Mexico/Canada/U.S. union. We studied trading blocks in grad school 1995. There will be eventually 3 trading blocks - The North American Union, European Union and Far East Block. Then we go to the Amero…

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 20:31:38

It’s the paraquat.

Is that like a kumquat? Except yummier? I hope?

 
 
Comment by Central Valley Guy
2009-05-17 16:33:57

What does this have to do with real estate, pray tell? Perhaps this sort of material would be better for blogs like “American Power!”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Mot
2009-05-17 17:44:58

Time to invoke Godwin’s Law.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by hip in zilker
2009-05-17 18:23:10

Interesting. I hadn’t heard of that before. Thanks, Mot.

 
 
 
 
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2009-05-17 10:28:36

What a lame-brain. From the article:

“look, the American experiment is pretty much as good as it gets (pace Medieval Iceland). So if you don’t think that the American form of capitalism can work, it hardly does any good to suggest that somewhere, some eunuchs could practice it better.”

Well, that pretty much ends the discussion, right? Let’s just all shut up and go home. No use trying to improve the system or change anything, because everything’s as good as it can be.

 
 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 06:57:13

Good morning everyone. OT: Here’s something to start your day with, a video I made on Utah wildflowers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hquFSaBvXcE&feature=channel_page

Comment by ATE-UP
2009-05-17 07:10:53

Losty, that was BEAUTIFUL!!

Not only did I watch it twice, I saved it! Thank you. So peaceful and pretty!! Well done!!!

ATE-UP

Comment by mikey
2009-05-17 07:57:49

Nice work Losty, amazing country, plants and critters. I also looked into Mysteries of Utah. Those weird images of Olygal, carved into those ROCKS, clears up a lot about her and the State.
;)

Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 08:37:52

LOL! I liked the weird music in the mysteries one. Check out the Arches one, I think she’s the person hanging off the side of one of the cliffs, having fun, as usual.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mikey
2009-05-17 08:53:23

lol :)

 
Comment by Aqius
2009-05-17 12:29:58

Heh heh !

 
 
 
 
Comment by Natalie
2009-05-17 07:17:04

What a beautiful spot for vacation homes!

Seriously though, you do great work. Good way to start a Sunday morning. Thank you.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 07:22:06

LOL!!! Fortunately, there’s no water out here, so the only ones who can have homes are kangaroo rats and bullsnakes. Unless you live in a town where it mysteriously comes out of the spigot.

Thanks for the nice comments, ATE-UP and Natalie. Only about one in ten photos I take doesn’t have a dog nose or tail in it. It’s a tough job, but somehow I endure. :)

Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-05-17 07:47:34

Lovely shots, just lovely.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 08:05:02

Thanks! Maybe the next one I do will be of all the shots with the dog noses in the flowers. :)

BTW, I’m dedicating this one to Ahansen…(tips a claret cup to Allena)

 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
2009-05-17 07:49:45

“What a beautiful spot for vacation homes!”

What a beautiful spot for vacation homes condotels!

Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-05-17 08:26:04

What a beautiful spot for vacation homes condotels!

I could visit anytime I want, and rent out my lovely unit to bigger suckers the other 51 weeks of the year. Sh!t, what could possibly go wrong?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 10:57:03

I could rent it and move in with my dogs. :)

 
Comment by Muggy
2009-05-17 14:31:39

Just pull up in your RV. Pantsless of course.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
2009-05-17 08:18:20

Wow. I just watched your Glacier Park video too. Stunning. I gotta hit the road… arggh, I’m staying put this summer to finish my masters degree. Maybe next summer… Lovely. Just awesome stuff.

 
Comment by SUGuy
2009-05-17 08:20:44

You have lots of finesse and vitality, skillfully executed just beautiful.

 
Comment by Fresno Dude
2009-05-17 08:46:58

I grew up country and have always liked wild flowers. Nice work. With the lack of water, how long do those flowers last? I think not long, so their sudden appearance and short life make them all the more beautiful.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 09:38:12

sometimes seconds (when I accidently step on one)…J/k

usually a few days, and they’re gone…

I think the word is ephemeral…

 
 
Comment by Don't Know Nothin About Buyin No House
2009-05-17 10:47:21

Nice work. I remember a utah river trip in HS on Yampa and Green. It was like you went back in time.

What software did you use to produce video?

Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 10:58:56

Thanks. I use iMovie on a MacBook Pro. I shoot the photos with a Canon Rebel and a Canon XH A1 HD video camera. I’m getting ready to port to Final Cut Pro, as iMovie has limited capability.

Comment by Don't Know Nothin About Buyin No House
2009-05-17 11:38:33

Thanks

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by hip in zilker
2009-05-17 11:14:07

Lovely

nice pollination shot

Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 11:58:19

The Sego lillies are really being pollinated right now, lots of bugs.

BTW, the bird at the beginning of the vid is a rock wren, hard to catch up with and very small. This particular one had a nest nearby and kept leading me away from it, it would let me close enough to get some shots with a telephoto. They have the most beautiful falling call. Starts out high and cascades down one note at a time, kind of like a minor scale.

Comment by hip in zilker
2009-05-17 18:26:01

Losty, do you know what is the raptor at 3:24?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 20:02:46

redtailed hawk

 
Comment by hip in zilker
2009-05-17 21:48:45

gorgeous

 
 
 
 
Comment by scdave
2009-05-17 11:58:06

SooooooWeeeeTTTTT….Lost that was great….Its loaded up on my computer and I may start each day off with that…Nice work…Thank You…

Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 13:28:28

:)

 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 13:50:04

Oh, Losty. That was so wonderful. I’m overcome. I need a quick lie-down for a bit to recover my faculties.
Later I’ll rhapsodize, when I’m through being emotional.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 14:07:19

I bet you recognize all those species, huh, Oly? Did you catch the Catalpa Tree blooms? Not a native wildflower, but I had to put it in there…

 
 
Comment by B. Durbin
2009-05-17 14:49:03

You have a gift for photography, Lost.

That’s a nice little break in the day.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-05-17 17:36:52

Losty,

This was beautiful. Mom, sisters and me give it a thumbs up. Thank you for sharing this with us. Love the dedication to ahansen.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 17:48:43

Thanks everyone for the great comments! Very very much appreciated! :)

 
 
Comment by Cassandra
2009-05-18 01:54:09

Chinle eh? I did a couple years in Tsaile.

Had to watch your video twice. Cliffrose are in bloom here too. And did I catch a glimpse of Mariposa Lily?

Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-18 06:53:50

Sego lily, maybe it’s the same thing? That’s my nickname from when I was a kid, I liked rockhounding in that formation…

 
 
 
Comment by Cassandra
2009-05-17 07:00:32

Does anyone know anything about the Greenville NC area?

I am considering relocating. Looking at real estate listings, there seems to be a flood of foreclosures selling in the sub $50,000 range. While I believe there are more declines to come, it seems to me, that at some point there is little additional risk.

If I buy a house for say $25,000 (cash) that I am happy living in, how bad can it get? Worst case, I figure I can live there for a couple years and let it go for taxes if I need to, and be none the worse off had I rented.

I have no further ties to my current location. I have a personal reason (ok, not a real good one) for moving to the area. Am I missing something?

Comment by Ben Jones
2009-05-17 07:06:49

‘Does anyone know anything about the Greenville NC area?’

There is/was a housing bubble there.

But don’t be hasty. Flag’s not that bad. Besides, you still owe me that beer and they have hefe on at Beaver Street now.

Comment by Cassandra
2009-05-17 12:24:10

Well then Ben, I can’t skip town with out settling my debts now can I? Pick a time and I’ll be there.

Flag can be a great place to live and it can also be a terrible place to live. I’ve lived here nearly 30 years. Expensive, but nice weather.

The best part about my living in Flagstaff? I know everyone.

The worst part about Flagstaff? Everyone knows me.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2009-05-17 07:11:02

I was just watching the CBS Sunday Morning show, which was sort of centered around Asheville, NC. If I were to move out of FL, it would probably be to Asheville.

I think the Carolinas will become the Cali of the east coast, for better or for worse. I just pray they don’t lose their beautiful low mountain scenery.

Comment by Ol'Bubba
2009-05-17 07:21:54

Palmy-
This former Pinellas County resident asks, “what makes you think the Carolinas will become the Cali of the east coast?”

And how do you mean “the Cali of the east coast”?

Thanks,

Bubs

Comment by palmetto
2009-05-17 07:28:25

Hey, Bubs. For starters, the population shift to the Carolinas, the presence of some tech and manufacturing, the fact that these states encompass both beach and mountains, etc.

Of course, it’s also been a popular destination for illegals due to factory work.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2009-05-17 07:22:03

The only thing is, when it gets humid in NC, you can’t say “But it’s a dry heat”.

Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-05-17 07:50:19

But you can’t do that anywhere in the Mid-Atlantic or South. If it’s “dry heat” you’re after, best look elsewhere.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-05-17 08:27:24

Then again, you knew that (pre-caffeination post, I’m afraid).

 
 
Comment by scdave
2009-05-17 12:04:53

It were the bugs that got me when I spent some time there.. Mosquitoes have landing lights :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2009-05-17 13:27:32

The entire east coast has a humid summer climate. I grew up on Long Island, lived in Florida for about 15 years and I’ve lived in NC for the past 3 years.

It gets as hot here in Charlotte in the summertime as it does in Florida, but the summer isn’t as long and relentless as the Tampa Bay summers, and the summer mornings and evenings are cooler in NC than they are in Florida.

I recall that during a typical summer day in Clearwater the temperature would be in the 90’s by around 10am and this pattern would stretch from late May into October. In contrast, the NC summers start around June and last until around September. The temperatures don’t get as high so early in the day here. On summer mornings the temparatures are usually in the 70’s and don’t hit the 90’s until around noon or later.

One thing I really enjoy about NC after living in Florida for so long is the four season climate. It gets hot here (but not Florida hot!) in the summertime and the leaves change colors in the fall. It gets cold in the winter (but not New York cold!) but the winter days have a lot of sunshine.

Back to your point- if you want to live in the eastern time zone in the U.S., then you’re going to have to accept a humid summer climate.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by dimedropped
2009-05-17 07:51:43

My family had a home up there for years and one year my Dad decided to spend the winter. After a few months he returned to Florida and I asked how it was. He said,”wet,cold and miserable”. He went on, ” I got so lonely that I went to the only thing open, the bank, and took out a $500 loan just to have someone to talk to.” I asked, “did you pay it back?” He said, “Oh yes, but I waited two weeks so I could see my friend again.”

That about sizes up the NC mountains in winter.

 
Comment by KJ
2009-05-17 08:44:05

They are quickly becoming Cali in one aspect. There was a report I read a while back which claimed in 2025 1/3 high school kids in the state will be Hispanic.

Comment by Milkcrate
2009-05-17 14:58:22

Que paso? Verdad?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by KJ
2009-05-17 09:04:55

Do you want to live in a neighborhood where houses cost $25K? Or $50K for that matter?

Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2009-05-17 10:36:41

I wouldn’t mind living in Oil City.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by skroodle
2009-05-17 09:46:57

I was in Asheville 3 years ago and they were building lofts right downtown for $400K+.

I asked my friend who works in Asheville who the heck was buying and he said rich retirees and wealthy college students.

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-05-17 10:39:05

The eastern mountains are a little too rustic for my taste. A wonderful place to visit, hike, camp, etc., but not my preferred full-time residence. And the elevation makes the climate cooler there year-round and I’m a warm weather fan. We’re close enough to see the mountains if it weren’t for all the nearby trees, but here there’s just a bit more civilization.

Speaking of cooler, has Spring been chillier this year where you live? Today is May 17th and yet the temp at 1:30PM is only 67 degrees.

“Nothin’ could be finer than to be in Carolina…”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Anonymous Coward
2009-05-18 11:37:33

Spring has been very chilly in NYC. Today is just ridiculous. I am very ready for some warm days. I’d even take hot and humid.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Eudemon
2009-05-17 10:56:04

Want an opinion? Do you really?

Greenville, NC, is horrible. It’s in the middle of nowhere, and it’s ungodly hot and humid. Lots of uneducated folks running around.

There are jobs there because they can’t get anyone to move there.

You’d be better off moving to Asheville for a while. Note, though, that Asheville is on its way to losing all that is good about it, largely due to equity locusts who can never seem to leave a good place alone. “Locusts” is a perfect name for such people.

The snobbery factor in North Carolina is on the rise. A shame. It used to be a neat place.

Comment by Cassandra
2009-05-17 12:18:32

Yes the humidity does scare me.

Eudoman, you said everything I feared.

Rustic/Rural is ok by me. I can keep up with the Ben Jones’s as long as I get high-speed internet.

Thanks for all the input everyone.

 
 
Comment by oxide
2009-05-17 11:01:26

The only thing you’re “missing” is the high-pace fast-lane glamour life that the TV commercials and magazines tell you that you’re supposed to have.

How DARE you live quietly below your means in a small house unsuitable for “entertaining?” How DARE you live without an Escalade, or granite countertops or those ugly glass bowl sinks. How DARE you live without going to the clubhouse pool, or without hiring a designer, or without catching a show or a gallery opening each weekend, or without overpaying for a prix fixe meal at some fancy restaurant every night. How dare you not spend every minute of your day busying about spending dollars or impressing people. What’s wrong with you?

(I’m being :roll: )

Comment by Cassandra
2009-05-17 19:34:56

I must have missed something in my upbringing. I though a “prix fixe meal at some fancy restaurant” was a happy meal at the drive through.

 
Comment by hip in zilker
2009-05-17 19:53:43

Shoot, Oxide. You can “entertain” at a small house without granite countertops. You just need a grill and a picnic table and some outdoor chairs.

Party’s over when your ancient giant lab “Paco” takes an enormous dump in front of everyone. (True story, 4th of July early 90s - not my house or dog, but well remembered by everyone present.)

Comment by hip in zilker
2009-05-17 19:55:04

Of course, this was after the food and the fireworks. If it hadn’t been the end of the evening, I’m sure we could have dealt with the situation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by packman
2009-05-17 20:35:30

We’re talking Greenville, NC, not Greenville, SC right? As in - east of Raleigh, ECU Greenville right?

Ummm…. no.

Greenville is flat, hot, with zero scenery and zero culture other than college bars and such.

Comment by Cassandra
2009-05-18 01:10:00

Correct. I couldn’t figure out the “mountains” comments. Are there mountains east of the Mississippi? Certainly didn’t seem to be any in east NC.

Comment by packman
2009-05-18 04:21:01

Oh there are some really great mountains east of the Mississippi - and Greenville South Carolina is in a really nice area actually for that, but definitely not Greenville North Carolina, which is on the coastal plain.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2009-05-17 07:05:22

BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Yessir, that’s some real credit card reform. If you gave Congress an enema, it would disappear.

http://www.freep.com/article/20090517/COL04/905170439/1081/A+query+for+Sen.+Stabenow++What+ever+became+of+usury

Comment by ATE-UP
2009-05-17 07:17:13

Palmy: I posted this yesterday. Thought you might get a laugh out of it. It was meant for you :)

To the Gang:

I am on a Sleepy Saturday Morning Reading Jag, and just thought I would write to tell you guys how much I love reading the blog. Yesterdays entirely disjointed comments, (Oly Highlites as always) left me with the distinct impression everyone on here is bi-polar.

Palmy, get me a concrete shack next to you. I’ll use you as my comp!
Then, I’ll devalue you by being your neighbor!!

ATE-UP

Comment by palmetto
2009-05-17 07:24:30

Hiya, ATE! I missed that. Yep, gimme that concrete shack for under $50,000 and life is good. Except, of course, for the AC bills. Although, I’d hate to see some of the bill for AC in one of those “volume ceiling” newer homes here in Fla.

Comment by Fresno Dude
2009-05-17 08:50:23

Yes, but termites cannot eat concrete

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 13:06:49

Yes, that was funny, ATE. And I appreciate how you generously informed me that ALL my split-personalities are beautiful. Because of your kind words we stopped slapping each other and just stood in front of the mirror playing with our hair and simpering all evening. Even the ‘Carrot’ personality, who normally bugs the rest of us…

Hahahah! :lol:

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 13:17:54

Actually, you know what? I’m gonna stop pretending and joking about split-personality and bi-polarity and stuff. Mental illness is not funny.

And more importantly, I long ago learned to avoid medical manuals and discussions of ailments because whenever I read any sort of pamphlet or medical dictionary or hear about any ailment I immediately fancy that I’m getting everything I read or hear about.

For instance, a few months ago I was reading an old Merck medical dictionary (from a box of books from a yard sale, 3 bucks for the lot), and I got: aphids, bubonic plague, cholera, dropsy, kuru, leprosy, pancreatitis, and random head-explodingness in one short but very busy hour.

Man, I got everything! Alphabetically, chapter by chapter! It was terrible. Good thing I lost the manual, huh? (The bubonic plague and head-explodingness distracted me and caused me to forget where I put it. Whew!)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ATE-UP
2009-05-17 13:57:21

You’re right Oly. Mental illness is not funny. But we didn’t mean it that way.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 15:04:12

But we didn’t mean it that way.

Oh, nohow. We didn’t, but then I thought maybe someone on here really isn’t having a good time being crazy, and I didn’t want to rub it in or sound unsympathetic or light-hearted, just in case.

 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-05-17 16:01:07

Oly-
Regarding your above post (Merck medical dictionary comment) I laughed so hard I peed, and then I laughed at that. Thanks.

Excuse me, my butts asleep, and I’m kind of getting into it.

 
Comment by mikey
2009-05-17 16:09:32

Can anyone possibly imagine boarding an aircraft for a long flight and being strapped in beside this chick, only to discover, after take-off…it’s THE Olygal !?!

I intend to always carry a sandwich on-board from now on just in case of such an event. Should it ever happen, I will look for a flock of suicide geese, wave my handy dandy sandwich and point towards the engines…within the 1st Five Minutes !

:) j/k

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 17:03:50

I laughed so hard I peed, and then I laughed at that. Thanks.

Serious? That could be a syndrome! I totally bet it is!

Excuse me, my butts asleep, and I’m kind of getting into it.

Oh, no! That is ALSO a condition of some kind! I have that one, too!
*falls off wooden chair laughing *

—Oh, but now I shall be serious, for 5 minutes, just for you, awaiting wipeout. You know how you were thinking about paradigm shifts? And other places to live? But you insist on sunshine? I have given your requests some thought. I’m still gathering data. I’ll let you know my results when I’m done, shall I? :)

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 17:47:08

Can anyone possibly imagine boarding an aircraft for a long flight and being strapped in beside this chick, only to discover, after take-off…it’s THE Olygal !?!

Okay, firstly, Mr. Sassy Person, you’d know me when you trundled your on-flight bag up the aisle, and right then you could request another seat, and secondly, you’d like sitting next to me. I’m peaceful and tranquil when I must be, and that’s partly because I love flying. Getting into a big metal object that runs off of minutely-controlled explosions and then blasting off into the etherical void is to me one of the most exciting things ever and it keeps me concentrated.
Every single time I do this thing I marvel and rejoice at what we human beans have wrought. I mean, lookit us! We can get stand in lines and then march into a giant metal tube-thing and shoot through the air and eat peanuts and be bored and everything! Is this not miraculous? It totally is. I never get over it…

I intend to always carry a sandwich on-board from now on just in case of such an event.

Oh, what, like a whole-wheat cape? With mayonnaise?
(It wouldn’t save you. Hahaha. ;) )

 
Comment by DennisN
2009-05-17 20:53:55

Aphids is a disease?

 
 
Comment by ATE-UP
2009-05-17 14:47:49

Also, Oly, I forgot to add, when I was younger and gave a flying sh*t about life, I always had everything in the medical books! That is why I went to law school, which, likewise, was an exercise in stupidity/insanity!! :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 15:10:42

I always had everything in the medical books! That is why I went to law school, which, likewise, was an exercise in stupidity/insanity!!

Hahahaahah! *snorty giggles *

Serious? You have it, too? (And why is this so funny to me? )
Anyway, here, ATE: let me offer you some precious advice, since you share my affliction: DON’T IDLY READ A POULTRY-MANAGEMENT PAMPHLET IN THE VET’S OFFICE.
Put it down, man!

If you do read it, once you get to the ‘Poultry Issues ‘ section your comb will start to droop, you’ll lose your taste for delicious corn kernels, and there goes your egg-laying abilities…
:lol:

 
Comment by ATE-UP
2009-05-17 15:21:39

:) :) :)

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 17:36:15

Can anyone possibly imagine boarding an aircraft for a long flight and being strapped in beside this chick, only to discover, after take-off…it’s THE Olygal !?!

What ‘long flight’? Where we going?! Will there be tasty food and dancing when we get there!? I’m already packed! :)

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by pressboardbox
2009-05-17 07:16:38

Do you think it is possible that the great pyramids were actually built on the sole premise of economic stimulus by the government? I just came to the realization that this could possibly be true. Think about it: The final phase of a credit cycle including everyone being employed in a government make-work project funded with monopoly money. Then: collapse…

Think about all of the new shiny govt offices and bank buildings, fire and police stations, schools, bridges, etc. Modern pyramids???

Comment by iftheshoefits
2009-05-17 07:43:21

Except that I doubt that our modern-day structures will still be standing in 6000 years for future generations to marvel at.

Or even in 200 years, for that matter.

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-05-17 08:09:40

Good points, both of you!

 
 
Comment by skroodle
2009-05-17 09:48:42

We don’t even know how they built the pyramids, but I bet they didn’t use any Chinese drywall.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 10:52:06

Didn’t use any heavy-duty fossil-fueled construction equipment, either; many years worth of slave labor had to suffice.

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-05-17 13:32:38

Just like multi-generational slave labor for Americans now to pay off the pork barrel spending enacted since late January - About two Iraq wars worth of spending.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-05-17 10:31:59

I always wondered about were they went to the bathroom?

Did they have slaves to rake up the poo, to keep the desert clean?

Then how did they transport it and where did it all finally wind up?

Such deep questions for a Sunday Afternoon.

————————————-
great pyramids were actually built

Comment by oxide
2009-05-17 12:31:08

Not exactly a deep question. My guess would be that they had designated slaves running around with chamber pots.

Comment by aNYCdj
2009-05-17 12:57:02

Then there must be MILLIONS of them still buried…LOL

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Lionel
2009-05-17 14:06:27

pressboard, I had a classics professor in college who proposed almost exactly what you’re writing about. He contended that wet, inclement weather in and around the Nile created large blocks of time in which the locals were incapable of farming and were thus an available resource for the pharaohs.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 07:45:41

Hint to MSM publishers who are having a hard time finding readers: Check out your online competition, who have scooped you again and again on the real housing bust story:

Housing Market Rebound by 2010? Not Likely
by: The Inflection Point May 17, 2009

The hope for stabilization in the housing market within the next year, as some market forecasters predict, looks to be a view held by those wearing rose colored glasses. From 2004 to 2007, there was $750 billion option ARMs originated, according to Insider Mortgage Finance. Comparatively, there were roughly $1.9 trillion mortgages originated for each subprime and jumbo category. Goldman predicts that more than half of all outstanding option ARMs will eventually default. With over $375 billion worth of option ARMs headed for delinquency within the next few years, it appears we are just entering the second wave of foreclosures in the housing market.

Over the past few months the Obama administration rolled out its plan to help struggling homeowners. The plan has provisions for both primary and secondary mortgages. For primary mortgages, the plan calls for interest rate modification and principal deferment. It goes even further for secondary mortgages, calling for interest rate modification and possibly even loan forgiveness. These programs may keep struggling homeowners afloat in the near term, but as Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com, noted “…in many ways, we are kicking the can down the road.” By lowering rates or deferring payments, we may be creating a legion of “zombie homeowners” that are anchored down by high levels of negative equity in their homes. The plan, while lessening the immediate economic impact by preventing some of the millions of foreclosures expected to take place over the next few years, fails to address the real issue at hand, which is the negative equity many borrower’s have in their homes.

The second wave of foreclosures, starting this year, is estimated to reach 3.5 million, according to a recent Credit Suisse report. These foreclosures will only contribute to the current vicious cycle as the foreclosed homes hit an already oversupplied market at fire sale prices, thus continuing to decrease home value. Borrowers struggling to keep up with their payments will have to deal with increasing unemployment, falling home prices and government policies that may do little more than delay the pain. The next wave will certainly touch all mortgage types and borrower classes but it will be the final remnants of the lending craze, the option ARMs, which lead the surge.

This article was written by Andrew Florio, analyst at JBH Capital.

Comment by Zombie Banks
2009-05-17 08:01:00

Tax the renters to pay for the homes at risk!
Uh, how ’bout giving pathetic renters a break?
No, tax them until they buy.

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-05-17 08:10:57

Tax the renters to pay for the homes at risk!

Well, that is one way to hasten the revolution against redistributors of wealth.

Comment by WT Economist
2009-05-17 08:33:53

Nahh, they’ll just say all the money went to the poor people. It’s worked before.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 10:54:45

You can’t squeeze very much blood out of a rock before the rock crumbles into sand.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-05-17 09:10:51

Thanks for the link PB. 2010 will be much uglier than 2009. Then 2011 will be the mother of resets.

The 10 year note yield might not go back below 3% before it reaches 8%, which will make matters much worse for those Option ARM resets. And nationwide unemployment may go above 13% by 2011.

People lucky enough to work now need to double up their efforts to pay off their credit cards and save in T-bills and gold bullion. Of course, this is much easier for us renters!

Real Estate - it sucks.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 10:57:39

“The 10 year note yield might not go back below 3% before it reaches 8%, which will make matters much worse for those Option ARM resets.”

Why do you have such little faith in the Fed’s ability to keep a lid on l-t interest rates, through a combination of quantitatively-eased purchases of l-t T-bonds coupled with premature bottom calls which guarantee the data will continually turn out ‘worse than expected’ and the Great Recession will last ‘longer than expected’? So far, so good…

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-05-17 12:46:56

LOL. Ok. I understand your sarcasm but will answer anyway: Because it will guarantee the data will continually turn out ‘worse than expected’ and the Great Recession will last ‘longer than expected!’

Actually the simplist answer is: I have no faith at all. Never did.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 16:18:39

The question I so far have not been able to answer for myself:

Are the Fed’s perpetual misses on properly gaging the magnitude of the housing bust by accident or by design?

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-05-17 16:32:44

There are two tools to answer that question: One is Occam’s razor and the other is if you tend to be a believer in conspiracy theories (and what percentage of conspiracy theories are proven?).

 
 
 
 
Comment by JimboAC
2009-05-17 10:00:32

The business editor for The Press of Atlantic City has always been a cheerleader and apologist for housing/developers/realtors in southern New Jersey. I was therefore surprised to see today’s column, in which he ever-so-gently suggests that maybe– just maybe– realtors would do best for their clients and themselves by telling the truth about the current state of the market. The old lies on top of lies routine doesn’t seem to be working too well just now, so maybe it’s time to try something radically different such as, perhaps, telling the truth. Just a suggestion by him, mind you.

Column was sparked by conversation editor had with an old friend, who presently heads some northern New Jersey realtors’ group. According to the old friend, the biggest– maybe only– problem faced by his group is members taking on listings at wishing prices demanded by delusional FBs.

 
 
Comment by Leighsong
2009-05-17 07:47:47

SFGate

More high-end properties sitting on the market
James Temple, Chronicle Staff Writer

Sunday, May 17, 2009

After 14 months on the market and about a $1.2 million price cut, a large, newly built home in the Oakland hills is on the verge of selling, assuming the bank allows it to trade for less than what’s due on the loan.

The approximately $950,000 “short sale” is a prominent example of something brokers don’t like to talk about, at least not brokers who represent owners: High-end properties are increasingly coming under the sort of pressure once reserved for moderate homes. In fact, as slowing price declines fuel hope that the real estate bottom is near, other signs suggest the worst is on its way for the region’s upscale market. (Cont’d)

Crap. Many of these folks selected the pick-a-payment. This will end well.

Leigh

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 11:02:25

‘…$1.2 million price cut, …The approximately $950,000 “short sale”…’

Sounds like it was listed before at $1,200,000+$950,000 = $2,150,000, and now available for a steal at only $950,000. That is a pretty nice haircut on the list price:

$1,200,000/$2,150,000*100 = 56 percent off!

Moreover, this puts similar price pressure on anything else of comparable quality on the market in this area of the East Bay. At least the next buyer won’t have to worry about qualifying for a $1 million+ jumbo loan.

 
 
Comment by KIA
2009-05-17 08:02:44

Hello, all. It’s been a while changed jobs, still in the foreclosure / bankruptcy business. Report from the trenches: bidders are showing up at foreclosure sales again. Sometimes they’re even buying houses. Of course these are at prices which the lenders now automatically shave down by 25% or more before submitting a bid, so it would appear to be bottom-feeding, but at least there is some action again. Expectation: the spring upswing (actually the “upswing” merely created an illusion of stabilization rather than a continuing decline) is petering out. The Neg-am loan wave is coming in the fall and it cannot be stopped. In combination with credit card defaults and the President’s demand for credit card legislation, credit-based spending will continue to contract, with dire consequences for businesses based on discretionary spending. Strip malls, even in Northern Virginia, which is usually relatively immune due to monstrous federal spending in the region, are beginning to show really noticeable vacancies, so pressure in the commercial area continues to increase.

Lenders are completely overwhelmed by loan mod applications. The word is they are getting 15 to 20 thousand a day. They absolutely cannot figure out how to handle that kind of volume, and nobody seems sure how they will pay for the write-downs.

Unbelievable as it may seem, despite soaring US unemployment, the lenders are trying to outsource loan mods as - get this - a cost saving measure. They might be willing to write off hundreds of thousands of dollars of an existing loan, but they want a third-worlder to run the numbers and make those decisions for $5.00 a day.

Comment by WT Economist
2009-05-17 08:36:47

That’s what people in finance are going to have to understand — they need more people not fewer.

Here in NYC finance has been shrinking as a share of total employment for two decades as the middle class people who actually checked things out were gotten rid of. But finance has been soaring as a share of total pay because the wheeler dealers at the top “earned” so much.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 11:04:25

“That’s what people in finance are going to have to understand — they need more people not fewer.”

Breaking windows sure does generate a lot of labor demand!

 
 
Comment by KJ
2009-05-17 08:48:23

Makes perfect sense. The loan write-offs are a done deal. That is a sunk cost in a sense and can’t really be controlled.

Paying people to do the paper work is a variable cost. And if someone can do the job for $5 a day in Chindia vs. $15 an hour in the US, why not? And you also get an added bonus of someone who will perform their job without the American employee attitude and sense of entitlement. I’d outsource the work even if the costs were the same just for that.

And you are exaggerating with the $5 a day. It’s more like $5 an hour. Outsourced labor is cheap, but it’s not THAT cheap.

Comment by Muir
2009-05-17 09:31:15

KJ

I salute you!
A true unabashed Capitalist!

You and my favorite personality, Kudlow, remind me why I am an unabashed Socialist. (albeit I did well on GSG)

Comment by KJ
2009-05-17 11:50:53

You’re my favorite kind of socialist….one who likes to make money using capitalist means.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Muir
2009-05-17 12:38:44

Thank you!

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 11:05:51

“And you also get an added bonus of someone who will perform their job without the American employee attitude and sense of entitlement.”

Plus the benefit of blaming some hapless third world subcontractor for anything wrong with the work that gets done (or doesn’t).

 
 
Comment by Fresno Dude
2009-05-17 09:22:30

In Eau Claire Wisconsin, I called the sheriff’s office last month and asked about the number of homes that went to auction, about 25 per month for the last six months. When I went to a web site for buying foreclosed, there were only 13 listed. The shadow inventory is what scares me. There are just too many homes and not enough buyers. Many who bought a home should have stayed renters, and with the economy down, many are doubling up. We need more renters, but with unemployment up, no money to rent. Another problem is all the debt, credit cards, underwater homebuyers, and in a way, unbalanced federal budget where the government is borrowing for us. Interest takes up all the money that could be used for buying goods, and no buying means unemployment since there is plenty of inventory and no need for manufacturing and selling. I have come to the conclusion the government should not have bailed out any banks or mortgage insurance companies, or underwater homeowners. Acute pain would have resulted, but would have worked through the defaults a lot more quickly rather than dragging everything out for a decade or more.

Comment by Neil
2009-05-17 21:10:55

Concur on the debt problem.

So neg-am in the Fall…

I could only hope. Wife is getting the ‘buy the house’ bug. If I can hold off until then… at least enough will become obvious.

I’ll admit this is far worse than I expected.

Scaring credit card companies out of the market will be interesting…

Got Popcorn?
Neil

 
 
 
Comment by cereal
2009-05-17 08:12:13

I know what you’re thinking, Punk

Has the credit crunch affected 6 zip codes or only 5?

In all the excitement I’ve lost track myself.

So I moused over listings in Bel-Air, Beverly Hills and Brentwood.

Days on the market for many $1,000,000+ props are measured in hundreds. There’s multiple price reductions from 13m to 8m.

What I really love is the little calculator that shows your monthly payments. Try $50,000.00 / month for some of these alligators. And forget about getting fire insurance up in the Santa Monica Mountains. My SIL just had her Topanga Policy cancelled as fallout from our on-going drought.

Comment by skroodle
2009-05-17 09:56:41

I’ve watched that Million Dollar listing show and it seems like housing prices in those areas are based on ego and not any fundamentals of real estate.

Comment by Frank Giovinazzi
2009-05-17 13:07:30

Don’t underestimate the importance of celebrity provenance in this category.

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-05-17 14:31:07

SIL….better sell asap to some clueless hap… or she be DOOMED!

If that isn’t a Big Red Flag I don’t know what is.

——————————————————-
My SIL just had her Topanga Policy cancelled as fallout from our on-going drought.

 
 
Comment by KJ
2009-05-17 08:39:43

The mrs. and I hosted a pool party yesterday. A lot of talk about the economy and especially real estate. But not much negaitve to say. It just struck me during the discussions how unaffected my circle of friends appears to be from “THE WORST ECONOMIC CRISIS SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION!!!”

Two couples took the real estate plunge. One of them also came to the party straight from the Lexus dealership in a brand spanking new shiny SUV. They foresaw the bubble bursting and sold their suburban house in 2006. They’ve been renting a condo in the city since. The other couple were 1st time buyers, also having rented condos/townhouses in the city for as long as I can remember. Both basically said they’re tired of renting, prices have fallen so much, it’s time to buy, the $8K tax credit was a nice sweetner. Plus they both wanted a yard. Another couple is in the final stages of completing a custom built vacation cabin (which I am very excited about since I know I will spend lots of time up there too). And finally, one of the guests said his boss made a $1.5M cash offer, on a house is listed at $2M and is waiting to hear back.

We had 20 or so guests. Nobody there is unemployed. Although one of my wife’s friends’ husbands said he was re-orged into some new territory and might lose up to $75K income this year. He probably made $250K last year, so it’s not like he’ll be starving. But that was about the extent of bad news. One couple was getting ready to go on a 2 week European vacation with their kids, another is going on a Caribbean cruise.

Maybe I live in a secluded bubble from the rest of the world. But I just am not experiencing - at least at the personal level - this recession/depression. People are buying cars, buying houses, going on vacations, living their lives. And before someone chimes in with “yeah it’s all borrowed money on the MasterCard”, it’s not. I’ve known these friends for years, decades in some cases. They’re smart with money and are not debt whores. If they’re spending, it’s money they have to spend.

Anyway, just some observations I thought I’d share.

Comment by exeter
2009-05-17 09:19:52

They’re the exception, not the rule. I say tax the snot out of them.

Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2009-05-17 10:49:59

Uh… what would that prove? The gov’t would just return the snot to them via bailouts, stimulus payments, etc.

Comment by exeter
2009-05-17 13:02:02

It would prove that the concept of justice still exists. These grossly overpaid non-producers have been ducking, hiding and absconding for years. It’s time for them to return what they’ve stolen.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by KJ
2009-05-17 15:45:49

Tax the snot out of people for being successful. What a swell idea. I’m sure that will give people incentive to work hard, start businesses, invent new technologies. After all nobody does any of that for profit, just to better mankind right?

 
Comment by exeter
2009-05-17 16:29:22

Theft and non-productive scamming isn’t successful.

Nice try.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-05-17 17:44:57

Successful AT WHAT?

Getting paid a big BONUS for firing 40% of the staff and outsourcing another 30%?

————————
Tax the snot out of people for being successful

 
 
 
 
Comment by Muir
2009-05-17 09:24:37

Yeap.

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2009-05-17 09:31:27

It’s not too unusual for people to feel unaffected by a downturn. Remember, even in GD-I, the vast majority of people still had jobs; I’m guessing that those particular 75% of the population felt relatively unaffected by the downturn as well.

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 14:36:42

I’m guessing that those particular 75% of the population felt relatively unaffected by the downturn as well.

But don’t they have neighbors and younger siblings and co-workers who ARE affected, Primey? Oh, yeah, and maybe kids and grand-kids too, now that I think of it?

Just the day before yesterday I learned that one of my own neighbors just got laid off from what looked like a totally stable and secure, long-term, state-government administration job. (Every single one of my neighbors are retired or semi-retired dept of Ecology workers or other govt. types who have been here for 17+ years.)

It was a serious shocker, from all accounts, and from all the perturbations I observed when I went to get the mail and everyone was standing there at the mailbox row.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by robin
2009-05-17 20:26:14

If you exist in a friendless vacuum, you are unaffected by this downturn. However, if you are a normal person with friends and associates from all walks of life you know several who have been deeply affected and worry about how many more will come.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by JimboAC
2009-05-17 13:47:34

They’re worse than “non-producers”; they’re counter-producers: leeches, vampires, blood-suckers, parasites, etc. Where’s a thesaurus when I need one? I’m assuming these big-spenders make their livings with their forked tongues, not with their hands or some bona fide value enhancing work.

Comment by JimboAC
2009-05-17 14:06:25

Speaking of bona fide value enhancing work, the wife and I just spent about three hours watching the movie, “Pearl Harbor.” It wasn’t as bad as I thought it was when I first saw it roughly five years ago; the romantic backdrop to the CGI battle scenes was sappy and old-fashioned in a good way. Anyway, when the bombers took off from the carrier for the bombing of Tokyo near the end of the movie, everyone was holding their breath to see if they would stay airborne or go in the drink. They made it, of course, and when they did, I turned to my wife and said, “Yeah, that’s back when American still could make engines.” Now, we seem just to make “financial products.” Oh, yeah. She asked me to be quiet and allow her to watch the end of the movie. I did.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 20:33:06

She asked me to be quiet and allow her to watch the end of the movie. I did.

You are obviously a keeper. :)

 
 
Comment by Kj
2009-05-17 14:38:48

Work with your hands? It is 2009 not 1809 my friend.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by JimboAC
2009-05-17 17:29:03

Come on, I did say “bona fide value enhancing work”; that would cover many things other than actually working with one’s hands. I really didn’t mean to swipe at your friends/invitees either. I just get so sick and tired of hearing people in my neck of the woods marveling at the “genius” and high six-figure incomes of those I know rake it in by tricking stupid people. What a way to make a living: Tricking stupid people.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Anon In DC
2009-05-17 09:28:14

KJ,
That was interetesting. Where are you ?
Send follow-up on the $1.5M cash offer for $2M asking price.

 
Comment by Shendi
2009-05-17 09:36:15

What are your friends’ area of work/ business? Seems like they run the businesses to be able to make 250k! And pray do tell what age group?

s

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-05-17 10:53:22

KJ, it’s pretty much the same here. All of our kids and their spouses remain employed. Same for nieces and nephews that we still know/care about. At a recent party, one couple we talked to claimed their portfolio was down about 20%, but 80% of what we assume is a lot of dollars is still a lot. Storefronts in strip malls are definitely emptying out. Restaurants aren’t as full, but none of our local favorites have closed yet. Boat dealers are dying, but the number of boats on the lake seems to be normal for this time of year.

The pain is definitely not being shared equally. But that’s always the case.

 
Comment by KJ
2009-05-17 11:53:42

This particular person is in sales for a large software company. $250K is on the low end of what he could make. He’s only been there a few years, still a bit of a rookie. Everyone else is in the tech sector in one way or another. Aside from myself, nobody owns their own business in this particular group.

Age group is mid to late 30s.

 
 
Comment by neuromance
2009-05-17 10:24:27

If you are hanging out with folks making 250K, building vacation log cabins (which can be fantastically expensive), work directly for people who can make 1.5M cash offers, then yes, you’re probably in a bit of a secluded bubble.

Median income in the US (half make more, half make less) is about 50,233 USD, as of 2007:

http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/income_wealth/012528.html

These are the folks you see traveling in the work pickup trucks, working at gas stations, working retail. I think those folks - Joe 6 pack - are in tough financial situations.

Comment by az_lender
2009-05-17 14:05:21

And the “working retail” is more likely to make half the median wage, or less.

 
 
Comment by waiting_in_la
2009-05-17 11:03:58

Yeah - sadly, I know plenty of people here in LA that seem unaffected, as well. But, I seem to know more that are affected (having bought condos / homes in LA at the peak).

The worst thing is most every renter I know is hot to trot to buy a house. The spring rally is in full effect. Everyone has ‘house fever’, again. It feels *almost* like ‘03/’04 now. Many people talking about wanting to buy.

The difference is less are *able* to … I am betting that once interest rates correct upwards and lending standards tighten further, the pool of eligible buyers will continue to shrink along with the volume of money available for transactions.

But, I think the current low rates and $8k tax credit (can’t believe this actually has an effect in CA) is pumping a major spring sucker rally.

Deep breath … patience…

Comment by waiting_in_la
2009-05-17 11:05:37

I didn’t mean the ’sadly’ comment as wishing harm on anyone. That didn’t come out right.

I guess I was referring tot the fact that it’s sad the people are still chomping at the bit to buy overpriced homes and get themselves saddled with debt.

Comment by az_lender
2009-05-17 14:07:14

Lots of us renters here at HBB are “hot to trot to buy a house.” But our advantage is, we have one another to warn us that the better opportunities lie ahead.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by BanteringBear
2009-05-17 14:56:57

What’s so surprising about the one-percenters not feeling the pain? They’re the ones who got bonuses for destroying the economy and sending the country into ruin. The money trail leads to their doorsteps…

 
Comment by pressboardbox
2009-05-17 16:04:39

I believe that your cirlce of ‘friends’ is the exception, not the rule. It is no ko-ink-y-dink that your group hangs together. Educated and prudent - a rare breed with little tolerance for fools. I am afraid that your cirlcle is outnumbered to the tune of a 1000 to one ratio by the overextended, msm-breathing, clueless, about to be jobless, uber-consumer, good-americans that also have parties but not like yours. Just my thoughts on your comment.

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2009-05-17 08:49:52

A brokerage head with an interest in convincing people that prices are high and stable claims that the market clearing price for NYC residential is a mere 30% off the peak.

http://ny.therealdeal.com/articles/corcoran-ceo-says-30-percent-cuts-make-sales-ivanka-trump-corcoran-pamela-liebman-jonathan-miller-dottie-herman

There may be a few flight capital and greenhorn buyers at the price, although why the capital would be fleeing here I don’t know.

“I am sure everyone sitting up here has received a plethora of 50-percent-off offers by sort of ‘predatory buyers’ who thought that every seller was distressed,” she said, but added that such offers were on the decline.

A more realistic view.

“We are well over half way in terms of what we have seen in terms of price decline. But I don’t think we are saying right now we are at the bottom.”

I’d say we are slighly more than half way down if 30% down is the current price. And by the way, why didn’t anyone talk about “predatory sellers” a few years ago?

Comment by Neil
2009-05-17 09:16:10

“We are well over half way in terms of what we have seen in terms of price decline. But I don’t think we are saying right now we are at the bottom.”

Not at the bottom? So why buy? Let’s see, 30% down and half way down… I think she should have sobered up before making some of the comments.

From the link:
“My brokers are telling me, ‘The way I am making deals right now is if I can prove to the buyer that this apartment [is] actually selling for 30 percent less than it sold at the height of the market,’” she said.

And what happens when new home buyers are less available? 50% of buyers are new buyers with down payments doing the “One and done” type of buying…

Don’t they realize they are eating their seed corn? After we get through the next few months and the market turns south again (it will), its going to get too interesting.

Got Popcorn?
Neil

 
Comment by Anonymous Coward
2009-05-18 12:30:49

The comments on story are pretty funny.

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2009-05-17 08:56:41

“Glen Crest, a former condominium complex in New Port Richey, experienced so many delinquencies and foreclosures that the remaining owners could not pay the maintenance. Pretty soon they all fell into foreclosure as well, and now the place is deserted.”

http://www.tampabay.com/news/localgovernment/article1001646.ece

Comment by Muggy
2009-05-17 09:13:10

Do we have any takers?

http://www.watersideatcoquinakey.com/gallery.html

I wonder what this place will be like in a few years.

 
Comment by ATE-UP
2009-05-17 09:27:40

Muggy:

I lived in New Port Richey, and sold in 2005. I was thinking about going back to “The Garden of Beacon Squares”, because I miss my friends there. The prices have dropped nearly 75%. I know that sounds unbelievable, but true. Nice place, not gated, but nice. Palmy’s concrete, but condo’s, two nice community pools, huge lake which is really part of the gulf, and I can’t believe the prices. I wonder if the same thing is happening there, or anticipated, and I just don’t know about it?

Thanks for the post.

ATE-UP

 
Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-05-17 10:58:46

LOL! When you go to Muggy’s first link, you see a shadow of an alligator with a wide-open mouth work its way across the page. Then CHOMP!

 
Comment by palmetto
2009-05-17 11:12:58

“When I tell you it is an unadulterated nightmare out there, I mean it,” said Harry Burnard, who owns Qualified Property Management in New Port Richey, plus a side business that fronts the dues and collects the debts.”

There are so many gems in this one small article, but I’ll start with this one, because what it is, is a variation on “factoring”, a practice common in the manufacturing business. I knew a lady who had a T-shirt business and used a factor to ease cash flow. Of course, they do take an arm and a leg, but the idea of “factoring” association dues is an interesting one.

 
 
Comment by DennisN
2009-05-17 09:41:52

I got to thinking this morning…

Banks are having a real problem with REOs. They kick out the foreclosed ones and the house then sits and rots for ages.

In the past there have been numerous “rent to own” schemes. Why not an “own to rent” scheme? The bank would take back the title and offer a lease to the FB, say a 2 year lease based upon a variable rent. The variable rent could be based on a fixed percentage of estimated value of the property. There are various “rules” discussed here how rents should track house values - pick one of them.

This would mean the FB would lose title to the house (which is fair) but get to stay in “their” house (which would preserve the property for the bank). The bank would get the title (which is fair) but not have to worry about an empty house rotting away or having to sell in a depressed market.

Comment by exeter
2009-05-17 10:35:45

I’ve often pondered bank behavior through this entire process of going back to normal. Did the thought ever occur to you that banks have little to no equity stake in these dumps? How else can you explain away the recklessness going all the way back to the beginning and up to this point?

 
Comment by Zombie Banks
2009-05-17 11:06:19

That makes too much sense. Havoc is right on schedule.
Stay home and enjoy the last few years of freedom.

 
 
Comment by neuromance
2009-05-17 10:11:54

“Why Economists Failed To Predict the Financial Crisis” - From the Wharton Business School newsletter

http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2234

Comment by combotechie
2009-05-17 11:49:01

Nobody could have seen this coming!

Lol.

 
 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-05-17 10:21:48

In this month’s e-mail missive, my friendly neighborhood Realtor is once again assuring me that there’s never been a better time to buy, thanks in part to the vaunted $8,000 tax credit:

“Over the past few weeks we at @properties have already seen an increase in market activity. We want to encourage all of our first-time buyers to take advantage of this unprecedented opportunity before it is too late.

With the right amount of planning and my extensive knowledge of the real estate market I believe that this is an ideal opportunity for first-time home buyers.

This appears earlier in the e-mail, but it’s noteworthy ’cause it seems like circa-2005 faux money deja vu all over again:

“Looking to spend your refund another way? You can also put the credit to use as a semester’s tuition at the University of Illinois, take that long awaited vacation with your family, or even as an added bonus to your retirement fund. However you choose to apply your $8,000 credit we cannot urge you enough to take advantage of this incredible opportunity.”

Comment by iftheshoefits
2009-05-17 11:14:43

Or pay $8,000 or more for the same place, than you would have otherwise paid.

The tax credit is for the sellers, not the buyers. It just happens to be funneled through the first time buyers. Those people are the only ones (possibly) left with any money, that are at all inclined to jump in feet first with what savings they do have.

The RE monster is hungry for their cash and will not countenance them holding onto it for other purposes. You can be assured that the tax credit money will be coaxed out of them, to be spent on more house than they othewise would have considered.

Comment by Groundhogday
2009-05-17 12:44:25

The bigger issue is that $8000 tax credit is small change compared to the degree to which houses are still overpriced. $330k asking price for a house that sold new for $232k in 2003… and was seriously overpriced even then. $8k is a pittance.

 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-05-17 10:55:21

I now make a point to go to Hermosa Beach Pier every other evening for a beer. Haven’t done that for several years.

So I park in the 12 hour free parking area and walk through a neighborhood of beach houses on the way to the bars. The street I take has several for sale signs, all Shorewood Realty. I’m thinking I will see more signs like that in the next three years and prices will continue to fall. It’s the 90254 zip code.

Comment by waiting_in_la
2009-05-17 11:14:37

Bill - taking time for a beer at the pier every other day sounds like a great plan! Good for you.

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-05-17 12:43:22

It is prescribed therapy by a couple of friends of mine.

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 14:23:54

Well, Bill in LA, are these ‘friends’ under the pier, or on top of the pier? *
Hahahahaah!

*…Oh, who am IIII to criticize the source?
Wisdom is wisdom, wherever you find it…right?
(Hiccup)
;)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-05-17 14:38:40

Funny! One of them manages to stay above the pier barely. He served in the Marines, a rough type of guy who also has a degree in C Sci. The other one cares about his reputation much more so he is certainly above the pier.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 15:54:37

One of them manages to stay above the pier barely. He served in the Marines, a rough type of guy who also has a degree in C Sci.

I like him already. Here, buy him a beer for me, wouldja?

He served in the Marines

Oh, yeah? Okay then, then tell him ‘Thank you’, as well.

Wait—you know what? Make that TWO beers.
I’ll pay you back. :)

 
 
 
 
Comment by combotechie
2009-05-17 12:20:20

Some useless trivia about the Redondo Beach pier:

Just after Dec 7, ‘41 the U.S. army installed and manned a howitzer on the short end of the RB pier for coastal defence purposes. Shortly afterwards a submarine periscope was spotted several miles offshore and thus the howitzer commenced firing.

All day long it fired, and eventually somebody went out in a small craft to investigate. What was found was some floating reminants of a small boat. The “periscope” turned out to be a pipe sticking up into the air.

This was right around the time of the Great Los Angeles Air Raid.

 
Comment by cereal
2009-05-17 12:53:12

Shorewood eh..?

I haven’t heard much from Boardwalk Realty or Venice Properties lately other than they’ve vacated space near my neck of the woods.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 11:18:27

Parallel noted between housing and oil markets: In both cases, speculators are driving up prices while an inventory glut builds up hidden away from plain view in the shadows. I expect this shadow inventory to eventually come on line in a massive tsunami wave that drowns the current speculator binge. And I can hardly stand to wait for the Schadenfreudic pleasure that will bring me.

I am also quite hopeful that the shadow inventory of houses and oil might some day get linked to Megabank, Inc’s hoard of TARP money. Wouldn’t it be just beautiful if bank rescue funds were funneled into keeping oil and housing prices at rapaciously high levels, instead of helping to ease the credit crunch, as intended?

Dean Calbreath
46% spike in gas price just doesn’t make sense
2:00 a.m. May 17, 2009
Photo of Dean Calbreath

In many areas of the economy, there looms the specter of deflation, with consumer prices falling over the past 12 months by their greatest percentage since 1955.

But you might not notice that fall in prices next time you fill up your tank with gasoline. Instead of deflating, gasoline is inflating. The big question is why.

Last week, gasoline prices rose above $2.50 per gallon in San Diego County for the first time since early November. Prices are now above the $2.25 mark nationwide.

That’s a 46 percent jump in just five months, up from a recent low of $1.71 last December. By July 4, analysts say, gasoline could surge above $2.50 nationwide and as high as $2.75 in San Diego County. Some analysts say it would not be surprising to see the price at some local gasoline stations creeping back toward the $3 mark.

“The major oil companies are betting prices will go up, and go up quite high,” said Charles Langley, fuel analyst at San Diego’s Utility Consumers’Action Network.

Langley noted that gasoline prices always rise in springtime, after refineries shift from their cheaply produced “winter blend” of gasoline to a more refined “summer blend.” But the change in blends typically results in a price rise of 10 percent to 15 percent, not the 46 percent hike that we’re currently experiencing.

So why are gas prices rising when other goods are dipping? Will the price rise dissipate after the July 4 holiday? Or is the run-up a new threat to an economy that is struggling to dig itself out of recession?

If oil prices were ruled simply by supply and demand, we should not be seeing this kind of price rise.

Thanks to the Great Recession, worldwide demand for oil has plummeted. Workers who have been laid off aren’t buying gas to commute to the office every day. Tourists are taking shorter trips. Businesses are putting fewer trucks on the road. In California, demand is down more than 10 percent. The International Energy Association predicts that global oil demand will average 2 million barrels per day less this year than last.

Because of the declining demand, the world’s supply of oil has risen to a 19-year high. As much as 150 million barrels of oil is floating in tankers on the ocean, being kept on hold until the oil companies decide it’s profitable to bring them in. Last year’s chants of “drill, baby, drill” seem more meaningless than ever, given that there’s more oil now being pumped than oil companies are willing to put on the market.

This conjunction of abundant supply and low demand should translate into cheap prices. But that isn’t the case right now.

“The fact that oil is over $50 per barrel, much less close to $60, doesn’t make sense in a pure supply and demand market,” said Judy Dugan, who tracks oil prices at Consumer Watchdog, a public interest group in Santa Monica.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 11:28:57

P.S. Given that household budget constraints are real, higher oil prices (and by extension, gas prices) reduce the amount households have available to spend on housing. The predicted consequences are lower housing demand, fewer home purchases, and lower equilibrium housing prices.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 11:30:07

… plus some combination of lower rents and a higher rental vacancy rate :-)

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 11:26:17

I thought empty neighborhoods were mainly a Sunbelt phenomena, but I now stand corrected. Heckuva job HUD, Fannie, Freddie and FHA!

Empty neighborhoods fill Rust Belt
By DAN SEWELL and FRANK BASS
The Associated Press

Sunday, May 17, 2009

CINCINNATI — Meet the forgotten housing crisis.

While most attention has focused on the wave of foreclosures sweeping mostly middle-class, suburban Sunbelt neighborhoods from California to Florida, the nation’s emptiest neighborhoods have remained concentrated in the same place for nearly a generation: the mostly minority, poor, urban neighborhoods of the American Rust Belt.

An analysis by The Associated Press, based on data collected by the U.S. Postal Service and the Housing and Urban Development Department, shows the emptiest neighborhoods are clustered in places hit hard during the recession of the 1980s - cities such as Flint, Mich.; Columbus, Ohio; Buffalo, N.Y.; and Indianapolis.

“I’d move in a heartbeat if I had somewhere to go right now,” said Cindy Olejniczak of Buffalo, raking trash from the lawn of a boarded-up house to keep it from blowing in her yard. Roughly every third home in her neighborhood is vacant. Not even pizzerias will deliver to the area now.

“It’s almost like you wish they would just level the whole neighborhood,” she said, “and start rebuilding again from scratch.”
—————————————————————————————————————
Top 25 Vacant Neighborhoods

A list of the 25 neighborhoods with the highest percentage of vacant homes, according to an Associated Press analysis of federal data. The AP analysis included only census tracts with more than 1,000 housing units and less than 5 percent vacation homes, according to the 2000 census.

County State Tract Homes Empty Pct

Franklin Ohio 82.3 1711 1158 67.7

Hamilton Ohio 9 1212 773 63.8

Hamilton Ohio 16 1154 587 50.9

Berkeley S.C. 207.03 2030 874 43.1

Wayne N.C. 5 1812 779 43.0

El Paso Colo. 38 1363 579 42.5

Yuba Calif. 409.02 2058 866 42.1

Cook Ill. 5401 3215 1344 41.8

Montgomery Ohio 8.02 1739 705 40.5

Marion Ind. 3550 1268 511 40.3

Wayne Mich. 5004 1134 442 39.0

Baltimore city Md. 802 1184 455 38.4

Linn Iowa 22 1135 434 38.2

Jefferson Ala. 51.01 1349 504 37.4

Genesee Mich. 15 1199 440 36.7

Fulton Ga. 23 1388 503 36.2

St Louis city Mo. 1267 1187 413 34.8

Wayne Mich. 5332 1136 395 34.8

Delaware Ind. 2 1118 385 34.4

Marion Ind. 3526 2046 702 34.3

Wayne Mich. 5079 1607 551 34.3

Wayne Mich. 5538 1138 388 34.1

Montgomery Ala. 2 1006 342 34.0

St Louis city Mo. 1241 2553 867 34.0

Jefferson Ala. 30.02 1570 532 33.9

Wayne Mich. 5333 1199 406 33.9

Source: Housing and Urban Development Department, U.S. Postal Service.

 
Comment by wmbz
2009-05-17 11:41:14

“Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn’t mean politics won’t take an interest in you.”
~Pericles (430BC)

Ain’t that the truth! I hate politics and the a-holes in that business, but you can’t get away from it.

 
Comment by DennisN
2009-05-17 11:42:54

It’s easier to play games with gas prices in California, since all gas sold there has to be special “regurgitated” gas. ;) Most states have a lot more flexibility in the formulation of gas offered for sale.

 
Comment by wmbz
2009-05-17 11:44:20

Bill Bonner works fulltime at analyzing economic events. “If you think this is just a pause in an otherwise-healthy economy…then, you might believe that things will pick up. That’s what’s happened after every recession since 1948. The average one lasted only about 10 months…with about a 2% decline in GDP. By those yardsticks, this one ought to be over.

“But if you believe that this is something more than a typical Post-WWII recession, then…watch out. The Great Depression lasted for nearly 4 years…taking 27% out of the GDP. And then, when it looked as though it was over, along came another downward whack in 1937 that lasted another 13 months.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 11:49:11

During a Recession, Being Rich Loses Its Luster
By 24/7 Wall St. Friday, May. 08, 2009

A sold sign is posted in front of a home at a new housing development May 4, 2009 in South San Francisco, California.
Justin Sullivan / Getty

Being rich during a recession can almost be as bad as being poor. The only difference is that the rich have more to lose. RealtyTrak, a research firm that follows mortgage trends, recently reported that the foreclosure rate on homes valued at more than $729,750, also known as the jumbo-mortgage limit, rose 127% in the first ten weeks of this year compared to the same period a year ago. Bloomberg, reports that “about $500 billion of prime-jumbo mortgages are bundled into bonds, according to Memphis, Tennessee-based FTN Financial.” The default rate on those bonds may rise as high as 10%, leaving banks with yet another set of substantial write-offs.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 11:52:04

THE BUSINESS INSIDER
Clusterstock
The Rich Are The New Subprime Borrowers
John Carney|May. 7, 2009, 8:58 AM

Tags: Economy, Banks, JP Morgan, Housing Crisis, Housing, Mortgages, Recession, Foreclosure

Not so long ago, the mortgage crisis was described as a “subprime crisis.” Pessimistic loss estimates were often said to go too far based on the size of the subprime market. Ben Stein famously said that the stock market sell off was “wildly out of all proportion to the likely damage to the economy from the subprime problems.”

Now, of course, we know that it’s not just a subprime problem anymore. Today Bloomberg describes the crisis in jumbo mortgages.

* Huge acceleration in foreclosures. The number of U.S. homes valued at more than $729,750 entering foreclosure jumped 127 percent during the first 10 weeks of this year from the same period of 2008. By comparison, the rate rose 72 percent for homes valued at less than $417,000.

* 10% Loss Rate on Securitized Jumbo Loans. About $500 billion of prime-jumbo mortgages are bundled into bonds, according to Memphis, Tennessee-based FTN Financial. In February, JPMorgan Chase analysts almost doubled their projections for losses on those mortgages to as much as 10 percent because of increasing defaults. For those of you keeping score at home, that’s another $50 billion in losses.

* Declining Sales. Lots of people stuck with a huge mortgage might want to sell their homes but their are no buyers at prices that will pay off the mortgage. Take California. While sales for all homes in the state increased 2.5 percent last year from 2007, sales of homes valued at more than $1 million declined 43 percent to the lowest since 2003.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 11:54:45

Don’t get excited, folks, as this is just the warmup. Just wait till all them prime and Alt-A ARM resets and recasts catch up with underwater owners of $1m+ homes…

You ain’t seen nothin’ yet
B-B-B-Baby, you just ain’t seen n-n-n-nothin’ yet
Here’s something that you’re never gonna forget
B-B-B-Baby, you just ain’t seen n-n-n-nothin’ yet
And you’re thinkin’ you ain’t been around, that’s right

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 12:08:54

Perhaps my optimism about the jumbo lending clusterstock is overblown, as it appears that the Fed is intervening to prop up the MBS market. Given that their primary constituency is the upper 1 pct or so of the U.S. wealth distribution, I expect they will do all within their power to tax the rest of us in order to protect the wealthy from their real estate investing follies.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 13:00:01

“tax the rest of us”

Of course, I refer here to the stealth tax of currency dilution, rather than the honest taxes that R-can pols like to decry.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 12:17:03

Don’t you hate it when people talk common-sense economic reality? It is so depressing!

HoweStreet dot com

He Who Borrows the Most, Wins
by Niels Jensen

“Never in the history of the world has there been a situation so bad that the government can’t make it worse.” -Unknown

Delinquencies are now on the rise on all mortgage products; however, whereas sub-prime started to deteriorate as early as 2007, it is only recently that delinquencies related to Alt-A mortgages have taken off, and prime and jumbo loans are only now starting to suffer.

These defaulting mortgages pose a very serious threat to the U.S. economy, but they are only part of the economic crisis worldwide. By far my biggest concern at the moment is the enormity of the debt problem facing most OECD countries. In the March issue of the Absolute Return Letter, I referred to an important study conducted by Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff back in December of last year.

Reinhart and Rogoff studied every banking crisis of the past generation and made some startling observations. One in particular caught my attention. According to the authors, governments inevitably underestimate the ultimate cost of a banking crisis, because the indirect costs (such as falling tax revenue in subsequent years) end up much higher than predicted.

The IMF estimates that the cost of the current crisis to the United States will eventually reach 34% of GDP or close to $5 trillion. However, the Obama administration, through its various implicit and explicit guarantees, is already using a number close to $9 trillion. And Reinhart and Rogoff’s historical average of 86% of GDP implies an ultimate cost of over $12 trillion!

The true cost is important, because it has to be financed through new bond issuance, and it is my thesis that the sheer size of this tsunami will eventually overwhelm the world’s bond markets. Even using the relatively conservative IMF estimates, the twelve largest industrialized countries of the world will have to issue about $10 trillion worth of new bonds to cover the cost of the current crisis.

However, if you (like me) believe that IMF underestimates the true cost of this crisis, Reinhart and Rogoff offer a more realistic approach. Using their least costly case study (Malaysia 1997) as our best case scenario, the true cost comes to $15 trillion. If one uses the average of 86% instead, the cost jumps to a whopping $33 trillion. I didn’t even bother to produce a worst case scenario - it all got too depressing!

I need to put the $33 trillion into perspective. Total global savings (loosely adjusted for the big losses in 2008) are probably somewhere in the region of $100 trillion. In other words, financing this crisis could absorb one-third of total global savings.

Hence it comes down to the price at which governments can attract sufficient demand from people like you and me. One of two things may happen. Either this crisis will ignite such a bout of deflation that investors will happily own government bonds yielding 2-3% or the deflation scare goes away ultimately, the global economy recovers and bond investors demand much higher yields for taking sovereign risk. I am not yet sure which scenario will prevail, but I do know that both are quite bad for equities longer term.

There is a third route, of course. Governments could print money for themselves, which they could then use to purchase their own bonds. We call that process inflation…and it is already underway.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-05-17 12:30:10

I noticed that one of those beach houses for sale I walked past yesterday was sold in 1999 for $399,000. It’s 1800 square feet, has a 2 car garage, four blocks from Hermosa Beach Pier, and for sale for $800,000.

I got the previous sale price and date from Zillow. Zillow shows the 90254 zip barely lost 10% since the peak in 2005 while Los Angeles county lost about 33%.

I’m still holding my breath.

The thing about HB is you have to be very tolerant of the party crowd. If you do not like noise, don’t move there. On Friday night on that same block of $800,000 to $900,000 houses someone was practicing his drumming. Peace and quiet folks would be better off in south Redondo Beach near the Esplanade.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by cereal
2009-05-17 12:57:40

I’ll try to pace myself. It’s hard not to eat 3 Dodger Spicy Dogs in the 1st inning.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Zombie Banks
2009-05-17 14:21:44

My friend’s sister is paying 10k a month to own in RSF.
BTW she is a realtor for snobs.

Comment by waiting_in_la
2009-05-18 00:25:00

stupid.

what a moron.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 12:25:15

I am seeing the same dearth of sales in high end San Diego zip codes as that discussed in this NYTs article about a wealthy area of Lawn Guy Land.

Tip for the Spodeks: Lower the listing price!

In the Region | Long Island
Sales Suffer in a Wealthy ZIP Code
Kirk Condyles for The New York Times

STILL LISTED Old Westbury has a glut of homes for sale starting at $1 million. They include Billee Spodek’s split ranch.
By MARCELLE S. FISCHLER
Published: May 15, 2009

Despite price cuts and a role in a reality series, Victoria Gotti’s estate has gone into foreclosure.

A SPACIOUS four-bedroom three-and-a-half-bath split ranch with an in-ground gunite pool and a cabana on two and a half acres with backyard to die for: Billee and Irving Spodek’s house went on the market last May for $1.975 million, and they accepted an offer on it within three months. But in October, just days before the closing, the stock market tanked, the bank withdrew its mortgage commitment and the deal fell through.

They quickly relisted the property, but to no avail. “I barely showed the house all winter,” said Ms. Spodek, an agent for Coldwell Banker in East Hills, who had planned to downsize.

Her house remains unsold; the listing price has dropped to $1.785 million, with nary a serious buyer in sight.

The Spodeks’ situation is not unusual in this wealthy village of about 1,100 homes and estates set along winding scenic roads, with its horse trails, polo fields, gardens and two country clubs. According to the Multiple Listing Service of Long Island, 88 homes here are on the market, priced from $949,000 to $20 million.

As if it were needed, here is more proof of how hard the downturn has hit the luxury market. According to a report by Prudential Douglas Elliman, it was the North Shore submarket — from Kings Point to Laurel Hollow, north of the Long Island Expressway and Route 25 — that showed Long Island’s largest decline in the first quarter of this year. The number of sales fell 40.3 percent, to 216 units.

Old Westbury is the heart of the North Shore. Its ZIP code, 11568, is ranked as the 10th most affluent in the country. From Jan. 1 through May 1, it had two home sales; last year over the same period, there were seven.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 12:05:49

So the Fed is now not only the lender of last resort, but also the real estate investor of last resort? Good thing they are a private organization that does not expend any U.S. tax dollars on their programs, as otherwise this move to snap up so many MBS would be subject to harsh political scrutiny.

FED FOCUS-Landlord of last resort ponders eventual open house
Thu May 14, 2009 8:05pm
By Pedro Nicolaci da Costa

NEW YORK, May 14 (Reuters) - If Federal Reserve officials think U.S. homeowners are having a tough time selling into a depressed market, just wait until they try to offload the mother of all jumbo mortgages: a $366 billion portfolio of real estate bonds that continues to grow.

In this light, an eventual exit strategy from the Federal Reserve’s multi-trillion dollar emergency measures might be viewed as the central banking equivalent of flipping houses, but on an epic scale.

It is not an enviable task. The U.S. central bank must weigh the necessity of removing reserves from the economy, because of potential inflation, against the reality that selling mortgage-backed securities could further dent that battered market, possibly pushing up mortgage rates.

A large chunk of the Fed’s rescue efforts is a commitment to purchase as much as $1.25 trillion of mortgage securities issued by mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Outstanding Fed credit, commonly referred to as the central bank’s balance sheet, was historically composed mostly of highly-liquid U.S. Treasury bonds. Before the crisis started in the summer of 2007, 92 percent of its holdings of about $855 billion were made up of government debt, according to official central bank data.

As of May 7, 2009, the Fed’s overall balance sheet has expanded to over $2 trillion, of which only about a quarter is Treasuries, with mortgage debt representing a growing slice of the Fed’s asset base, according to the Fed’s weekly H.4.1 report. (here)

“It’s going to be a massive undertaking, especially given the size that we are likely to see before all is said and done,” said Kim Rupert, managing director of global fixed income analysis at Action Economics LLC.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 16:15:20

Important question:

Will the Fed serve guacamole dip at their open houses?

Comment by Muir
2009-05-17 17:39:22

Doubt it PB.
Cheap bastards.

 
 
 
Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 12:12:24

A friend of a friend has over 200 job apps out and has had no bites, this all in the last month in W. Colorado, he’s visited a number of resort and oil patch towns. I didn’t know there were that many businesses around that area.

He’s a burned-out fry cook.

You may laugh, but burned-out fry cooks have always been very accurate economic indicators. They can always get jobs. They get no benefits and ask for none. They’re the easiest kind of employee to find, and they are very employable (but only as fry cooks, mostly). Since they come and go like the weather, there are always openings. And he works in the kinds of restaurants that aren’t expensive.

When fry cooks can’t get jobs…

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 12:21:33

Four years ago, one could not have walked into a half-decent restaurant anywhere in San Diego on a Saturday evening without expecting at least 1/2 hour waiting time. Last night we went out to Claim Jumper, a popular family style restaurant, during the peak evening dining period, and there were plenty of vacant tables the whole time we were there (and, needless to say, no waiting for a table).

Comment by cereal
2009-05-17 13:04:13

Ditto Enterprise Fish Co. in Santa Monica.

No wait, plenty of parking.

 
Comment by Kj
2009-05-17 13:37:12

I went to on the border 2 weeks ago. There were cars parked on grass since all the parking spots were taken. Cali really is different after all.

 
 
Comment by combotechie
2009-05-17 12:34:50

“… he’s visited a number of resort and oil patch towns.”

Therin lies his problem.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 12:43:42

That’s about all we have in W. Colorado…

Comment by combotechie
2009-05-17 13:01:33

Uh, well he might try his luck elsewhere.

Cleveland perhaps?

Okay, that was a litle snarky, but my point is the strength of the local economy means everything, and not just to fry cooks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 13:48:42

That’s OK, Combo, my comment was a bit tongue in cheek.

But are you saying all economies are local? :)

 
Comment by combotechie
2009-05-17 14:30:22

“But are you saying all economies are local?”

Don’t know how tounge-in-cheek you question is, but, yeah, I’d say all economies are local.

Money flowing into an economy must be flowing in from the outside. If the outside money stops its inward flow then the economy grinds to a halt.

 
 
 
 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-05-17 13:01:17

You may laugh, but burned-out fry cooks have always been very accurate economic indicators. They can always get jobs.

A good line cook with decent experience should be able to find work like that (snaps fingers) in “normal” times.

Then again, the restaurant industry is yet another sector that grew enormously during the days when faux real estate wealth and EZ credit flowed free and easy.

I asked Muggy’s 8-ball if America needed so many bland-but-serviceable restaurants, and it said “Not so much.”

 
Comment by exeter
2009-05-17 14:22:15

Lost,

That is sad. It is those folks in that salary band who spend every last dime of earnings on basic living expenses. The guy needs simple opportunity in a land that has been raped robbed and pillage by those who who have more than enough.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 16:55:50

Agreed. I wonder what Utah Phillips would have to say if he were still alive.

 
 
Comment by Milkcrate
2009-05-17 16:00:30

Texas Burger down the street just closed.
Big Boy a few months ago.
I have my Skyline sent to home via UPS.

 
Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 19:48:11

He’s a burned-out fry cook.

Sorry to say, I DID laugh. ‘Burned out fry-cook?’ But then I realized it wasn’t a joke and I stopped laughing right away.

Look, a good fry-cook is a shining treasure. Successful cities have been built upon, and have subsequently survived upon less than a successful fry-cook.
I’m sure I’m right, here.

Comment by Lost in Utah
2009-05-17 20:04:25

better than a burned up fry cook…

Comment by ex-Wreck
2009-05-18 22:19:52

…or a burned-out fly crook

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 12:48:42

Some questions regarding recent unconventional moves by the Fed to prop up the U.S. housing market:

1) Given that the Fed is snapping up MBS at fire sale prices, is it possible they are purchasing the underlying as well (houses), in order to prop up the value of their own real estate investment portfolio?

2) Is it even legal for the Fed to buy real estate?

3) Will they eventually have to open up an REO department?

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 12:57:28

4) Given the lack of U.S. voter support for the creation of a government-sponsored toxic asset Superfund site, has the Fed appropriated its own balance sheet to this purpose?

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-05-17 14:16:59

#2. No, but the feds owned much of, say, Nevada, for decades. Yeah it’s one thing to own vacant land, but to own buildings that must be maintained, thus paid for by the 32% of Americans who are renters. Grrrr!

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 16:08:24

“feds” vrs. the Fed:

I assume by “feds” that you mean the Constitutionally-legitimized U.S. government.

I was talking about the super-Constitutional, non-elected Federal Reserve Bank.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 16:12:53

5) Part of the Fed’s mythology is that they are an independent central bank. If they are propping up the value of U.S. home prices, they are protecting the interests of one group of Americans (homeowners, real estate investors, speculators, stakeholders in banks) over others (renters, those who are too poor or financially prudent to purchase or speculate in real estate, etc). Aren’t they supposed to maintain a stable currency, and that’s about it? What gives them the right to choose winners and losers in the economy? Can they do just about whatever they please, since they are not beholden to Constitutional law?

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 16:13:59

6) Wouldn’t it be in our country’s interest to know whether the Fed has exceeded the bounds of its legal purpose (whatever that is)?

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-05-17 16:30:01

Yes, they are supposed to maintain a stable currency, not take sides on the economy and certainly not force one group of people to subsidize another group of people.

Since they do not follow the Constitution, why should we sanction the occupiers of Washington by paying taxes?

It’s high time we consider them the enemy who hijacked our Republic. They have to be hijackers because they are not following the rules of the Constitution.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 17:10:55

7) Doesn’t artificially propping up the value of real estate assets tend to perpetuate the overinvestment in real estate that led to the market distortions that are currently sinking the system?

8) Since the Fed is so active in financial governance, shouldn’t they be subject to the same checks and balances that constrain the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the U.S. government? Perhaps the Constitution could be amended to form a fourth branch of government, the financial branch, which would be on an equal footing with the extant three? This would be an improvement over the status quo, where a rogue actor can execute whatever measures it pleases, subject to the whims of its captors, above the law and scrutiny.

Comment by drumminj
2009-05-17 22:11:40

Perhaps the Constitution could be amended to form a fourth branch of government, the financial branch

I really hope to see the Constitution amended in my lifetime (I don’t believe it has been in the past 30 years). It seems these days that people think the way to “change” the constitution is to interpret it differently, rather than to amend it as intended.

I really think it’d be a cool process to witness, and I’d be very interested to see the types of discussions people had, how the change was “marketed”, etc….

BUT, I really don’t want to see an amendment to add a central bank/the FED. But I agree with you, PB, that if we’re going to have a central bank (period, but definitely one as far-reaching as the Federal Reserve is at the moment), it should be considered in the Constitutional framework and subject to some system of checks and balances as you suggest.

Comment by DennisN
2009-05-18 02:19:11

The XXVII amendment was ratified as recently as 1992. It states: “No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.”

In other words, if Congress votes itself a pay raise, it won’t take effect until after the next election.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by drumminj
2009-05-18 08:19:51

Oops. Well I guess I should have been paying better attention when I was 14 :/

Come to think of it, I vaguely remember that legislation, but have no recollection of it being a constitutional amendment.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 12:50:50

Forbes dot com
Commentary
Fed Up
Ron Paul, 05.15.09, 07:10 PM EDT
Audit the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve’s recent and unprecedented actions in the realm of monetary policy have provoked a backlash among the American people. Trillions of dollars worth of loans and guarantees have been provided to Wall Street firms, while Main Street Americans suffocate under harsh taxation, the prospect of higher debt levels and increasing inflation. These events have awakened many Americans to problems with the Fed’s loose monetary policy, the bubbles it has created in the past and the potential hyperinflation it might cause in the future.

One of the fallacies of modern economics is the idea that a central bank is required in order to keep inflation low and promote economic growth. In reality, it is the central bank’s monetary policy that causes inflation and depresses economic growth. Inflation is an increase in the supply of money, which in our day and age is directly caused or initiated by central banks. All other things being equal, inflation results in a rise in prices. A so-called “mild” rate of inflation of 3% per year leads to a 56% rise in prices over a 15-year period. Even a “low” rate of inflation of 2% per year leads to a 35% rise over that same period. How is that conducive to long-term growth?

Comment by az_lender
2009-05-17 14:49:13

PB, you went on a tremendous posting binge, and now have stopped for a couple of hours. Since this one is your last top-level post, maybe it’s your answer to all your previous posts. I’m a Ron Paul fan and donor, but suppose we do audit the FRB, what then? We find out they’re broke, and a panic worse than last fall sets in? Is that useful?

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 16:06:33

I subscribe to the faith that truth is more useful than fiction. Look where economic fiction got the former Soviet Union towards the end of their existence. We are a free country with a Constitution that uniquely makes freedom of speech a basic right. It would be a shame for a cloud of econoganda blowing out of the Fed’s bullhorn to continue leading us down the path to economic totalitarianism, when we have the collective right to figure out what is really going on and openly discuss it.

 
 
Comment by neuromance
2009-05-17 16:41:34

Inflation is an increase in the supply of money, which in our day and age is directly caused or initiated by central banks. All other things being equal, inflation results in a rise in prices. A so-called “mild” rate of inflation of 3% per year leads to a 56% rise in prices over a 15-year period. Even a “low” rate of inflation of 2% per year leads to a 35% rise over that same period. How is that conducive to long-term growth?

It’s really good for a lending-based economy.

But eventually, that money has to be paid back, with interest.

I know the theory is that people can borrow when their incomes are lower, then pay it back when their incomes are higher. But do people’s incomes really increase that dramatically? Plus, this sucks out so much personal wealth from the individual, because they have to pay usurious interest rates in the interim.

I don’t think an economy so dependent on debt is a good thing for the members of that economy.

I’ve been struck at how what is good for the economy (relentless spending and heavy individual debt) is bad for the individual.

I think that system is broken. PB, your inflation rate observation has really opened my eyes. This constant erosion of personal wealth seems like a subtle movement of wealth from the average person to the elites.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-05-17 13:57:11

What have we done to the earth?
What have we done to our fair sister?
Ravaged and plundered and ripped her and bit her,
Stuck her with knives in the side of the dawn.
And tied her with fences and dragged her down.

- Jim Morrison

Any news of more bulldozed neighborhoods since Victorville? Maybe we should put Nature Conservancy in charge to be sure the toxics are cleansed from the earth on the bulldozed ‘hoods.

Me, I’m always for Clean air, clean water, clean earth, natural declining (without coercion) population (maybe to one billion inhabitants of earth), and Capitalism.

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-05-17 14:03:21

end italics

 
 
Comment by Zombie Banks
2009-05-17 14:29:03

I want a home to own. I’m thinking mobile home.

 
Comment by ATE-UP
2009-05-17 14:38:18

Good Idea Zombie, but what are you going to do re lot rent, and potential meth head neighbors? NOT knocking all people in trailer parks, just curious. Where can you buy land with sewer, water, for a reasonable price? My curious on this.

 
Comment by Zombie Banks
2009-05-17 14:54:33

You are correct. I hate noises so i’ll just rent. But as long as income taxes are going up and savings goes to big gov I have no chance anyway. California is going to blow up!

Comment by exeter
2009-05-17 18:54:33

doomsday.

 
 
Comment by B. Durbin
2009-05-17 15:21:49

I went on Craigslist the other day because, for some reason, nobody in my area lists houses for rent anywhere else. Seriously, the local rental sites are apartments only, which leads me to believe that the houses being rented out are all owned by wanna-be landlords.

I found out something astonishing (or maybe not so much, given that it’s Craigslist.) Our PITI is actually well below the rents there. The lowest rent I saw for a 3/2 house was $1295/month, and 4/2s were running $1400 and up.

What does this prove? I dunno, maybe that the local Craigslist listers are deluded.

In other news, we still don’t have the keys.* The bank’s got our money, now they’re dragging their feet. We may have to take them to small claims court– we already probably have to scrap the “paint before moving” plan, and if they delay much more, Evil Rob will not be able to help move (because he can’t take any time off in June.)

Not sure what to chalk that up to. It’s probably just the bank’s normal lack of consideration.

*We have considered breaking into our own property, but that’s a sub-optimal solution.

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 15:48:21

Oh, no, B. Durbin. That’s totally Craptastick-y. Craptastick-y squared.
I was so looking forward to hearing about your garden plans and perhaps seeing some photos of this big pine-tree you have. :)

Tell us more details and also keep us updated, how about?

—-Oh, you know what, maybe they just lost the keys! Yes, really!
I mean, it’s not like banks are run by junior Brainiacs, right? (collapses with snarky giggles.)
And one thing I’ve noticed about banks is, they never want to admit that they aren’t being run by junior Brainiacs. Because that would make their dark suits and ties look stupid, if they admitted that.

Maybe you SHOULD just bust in, if you have the title and everything, and then change the locks and then innocently say, if ever questioned, ‘Oh, the door was open. We thought you left if open for us, considerately?…’

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2009-05-17 15:54:46

Anyone else excited for tomorrow! w00t-w00t! I’m hooked.

Go away! Tradin’!

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 16:10:27

Okay, what, didjer Magic 8-Ball enchant you with words of promise and joy and endless riches? Or did you just get seriously sunburned whilst hanging out on the beach?

Seriously, man. You were just bemoaning your scorched digits at the very top of today’s post.

Although, on the other hand, there IS some tremendously good trading and money-stuff advice to be found here on Ben’s Blog…
(I do wish I personally understood this tremendously good advice, but that’s another subject.)

Anyway, good luck to you, Mr. Muggy. Woot! Woot squared!

Comment by Muggy
2009-05-17 16:42:06

“You were just bemoaning your scorched digits”

I didn’t totally understand the nuclear financial instrument I spent a lot of money on. Lucky for me it went the right way and I have time to correct.

 
Comment by Muir
2009-05-17 17:44:38

I’m long and hard tomorrow.
I’m talking about OIL Oly.

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 18:13:40

Ahhh…good to know.

Oh, and btw, how’s your sea turtle project going there, Mr. Muir?

*smothered giggles *

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-05-17 16:11:49

i’m excited for football season. The next three months are painful.

 
Comment by bink
2009-05-17 17:31:41

When do you take over for Buffett at Berkshire Hathaway?

Comment by Muggy
2009-05-17 17:54:57

“When do you take over for Buffett at Berkshire Hathaway?”

War-dog (that’s what he asked I call him) hasn’t met my demands yet.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 17:05:26

I am so confused. If the gubmint can summarily allocate $700 bn in TARP funds to Megabank, Inc, why is it so problematic to help out 500+ banks with a piddly $24 bn in additional bailout monies? Like so many other stories out of the financial press these days, this one is incoherently related to others that are currently in circulation.

Financial Times
Smaller US banks need additional $24bn
By Saskia Scholtes, Julie MacIntosh and Francesco Guerrera in New York
Published: May 17 2009 22:57 | Last updated: May 17 2009 22:57

Small and medium-sized US banks must raise some $24bn to meet the capital standards set by the government in its stress tests of large institutions, research for the Financial Times shows.

News of the potential capital shortfall could increase pressure on many of the 7,900 US banks that form the backbone of the US financial system.
EDITOR’S CHOICE
Fund cites BofA chief over Countrywide sale - May-17
Temasek sells entire stake in BofA - May-15

As many as 500 more banks could close, according to investment bank Sandler O’Neill, which carried out the research.

Since this month’s release of the tests for the 19 largest banks, regulators and investors have increased their focus on the next tier of lenders, amid concerns some of them might struggle to survive if the economy worsens.

The government’s stress-case would result in capital shortfalls for 38 per cent of the 200 banks below the 19 largest financial institutions, leading to a deficit of around $16.2bn in common equity, according to Sandler O’Neill.

Applying similar criteria to the remaining 7,700 banks in the US would result in a further $7.8bn capital deficit.

The banks have to repay a combined $27bn in aid from the Troubled Asset Relief Programme (Tarp) but they could do that from internal resources rather than raising more funds.

 
Comment by EastBayRenter
2009-05-17 18:08:59

I have a question that has been been popping up lately in our house…. Due to the President and Congress blowing out our debt and the Fed printing trillions of dollars it is only a matter of time until we see significant inflation. What impact does everyone think this will have on housing? Interest rates will HAVE to go up, but will prices then correspondingly come down even further or will they go up due to inflation? My husband and I are concerned about this issue and was wondering what others thought… I personally don’t see how we can have rising house prices due to unemployment/falling wages/banks not loaning/etc…….

 
Comment by cactus
2009-05-17 19:25:05

Now a solution to get inflation going again, make traffic worse, cause homes prices to be unaffordable to many and generally just get the ponzi game going again. On the flip side this probably will create jobs.

” Our friends in Washington continue to reward witless members of the financial sector. Meanwhile, those of us who don’t fly bonus class think about importing guillotines from France.

Thankfully, we may not need to place the order.

All we have to do is to get Washington to listen to the best idea I’ve heard to end the decline of housing prices and thereby restore our confidence in the most important assets most Americans ever own. The idea comes from economist A. Gary Shilling and real-estate developer Richard S. Lefrak.

Their suggestion: Don’t think about artificially low mortgage interest rates and other stopgaps. Instead, eliminate the oversupply of houses. Too many were built during our speculative bubble. And, by the way, don’t spend a dime of taxpayer money doing it.

How can this be done? Simple: Open our borders to immigrants who can buy homes in the U.S. Let a million immigrants a year do this for two years and the entire oversupply of homes and condos would be absorbed. Supply would no longer dwarf demand. Prices would stabilize. The most important assets of the vast majority of Americans would, once again, be a source of pride and security.”

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 19:51:20

“Open our borders to immigrants who can buy homes in the U.S.”

Er — hasn’t this pretty much already been attempted? How did it work out?

Comment by cactus
2009-05-17 20:00:40

I don’t know has it ? I think most are not Citizens just because they buy a house, of course just because they are rich enough to buy maybe they don’t want to be citizens ?

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 20:37:08

You sound grumpy, cactus. Here, have a potato. (hands cactus a potato)

If I was handy, I’d also buy you a chilly beer. Beer is even better than a potato, in my experience.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by SDGreg
2009-05-17 22:08:15

“Open our borders to immigrants who can buy homes in the U.S.”

How did that work out for the strawberry pickers?

 
 
Comment by SDGreg
2009-05-17 22:16:00

“How can this be done? Simple: Open our borders to immigrants who can buy homes in the U.S. Let a million immigrants a year do this for two years and the entire oversupply of homes and condos would be absorbed. Supply would no longer dwarf demand. Prices would stabilize. The most important assets of the vast majority of Americans would, once again, be a source of pride and security.”

Let those @sshats take those people into their city and overrun their schools, roads, parks, etc. I’m tired of paying more for housing and enduring a generally reduced standard of living from overcrowding just so greedy developers and their enabling politicians can prosper.

One question on this plan: How do two million immigrants soak up 19 million surplus properties, especially if they’re living 10-20 per property?

 
 
Comment by cactus
2009-05-17 19:57:16
Comment by SDGreg
2009-05-18 02:23:24

It last sold for $675k at the end of Aug 2005, right at the peak of the bubble. Prices have declined about 50 percent since then. They’re now asking $769k. Insane. Still lots of super high wishing prices not tethered to any sort of reality.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 20:05:01

Can ABS work without the scam elements?

Financial Times
Disclosure move aims to revive ABS market
By Ralph Atkins in Frankfurt and David Oakley in London
Published: May 17 2009 20:48 | Last updated: May 17 2009 20:48

The European Central Bank is pushing for an increase in the amount of information that has to be disclosed about asset-backed securities as part of efforts to revive a market that has collapsed since the start of the credit crisis in August 2007.

The ECB wants more details on these securities to be passed to ratings agencies, including data on the individual loans that back them. These are mainly mortgages, but also include credit card, corporate and car loans.

It hopes this will rejuvenate the European market by boosting confidence in the ratings, which in turn should encourage investors to buy the securities because a lack of transparency has been deterring them.

There have only been 11 asset-backed deals in Europe this year, worth €5bn ($7bn), including one by Porsche. In the first seven months of 2007, there were 241 deals in Europe, worth €199bn, according to Dealogic, the data provider.

A revival in the securitisation markets would help the broader economy as it would provide banks with more money to lend.

However, analysts say the ECB should also push for full public disclosure of the loans that back these securities – as in the US – and not just to the ratings agencies. The US market has been hit too, but has seen more signs of recovery. This year there have been 130 deals, worth $80.6bn.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 20:07:54

How is it possible to discern what the real economyd is doing when the Fed is executing so many extraordinary market-distorting interventions?

Wall Street Journal

* MAY 17, 2009, 4:45 P.M. ET

Orszag: Economy’s Freefall ‘Seems to Have Stopped’

By AUGUST COLE

The White House’s top budget official, Peter Orszag, said on Sunday that the decline of the U.S. economy appears to have slowed but that the country wasn’t yet in the clear.

“The freefall in the economy seems to have stopped,” Mr. Orszag said during an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “The analogy is there are some glimmers of sun shining through the trees, but we’re not out of the woods yet.”

Budget Director Peter Orszag, left, with President Barack Obama earlier this month.

Mr. Orszag, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, said the administration would update its budget assumptions in the coming months, as planned. He urged patience when it came to seeing results from the government’s $787 billion economic-stimulus plan, noting that only $100 billion has been allocated since the legislation was enacted three months ago.

“It takes time to get money out the door wisely,” he said.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 20:11:03

Won’t more new home construction add to a record glut of vacant homes in the U.S.? Not that there is anything wrong with that…

Wall Street Journal
Home Starts, Leading Index Probably Rose: U.S. Economy Preview
By Bob Willis

May 17 (Bloomberg) — Builders probably broke ground on more houses in April and a measure of the U.S. economic outlook rose for the first time in almost a year, adding to signs the recession was abating, economists said before reports this week.

Housing starts increased 2 percent to an annual rate of 520,000 last month, according to the median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News before a Commerce Department report on May 19. The index of leading economic indicators probably climbed 0.8 percent, figures from the Conference Board may show.

An easing in the housing slump, now in its fourth year, is an essential element of most forecasts for an economic recovery later this year. Rising stock prices and improving consumer confidence are among the components of the leading index that are stoking speculation the economy will begin to grow again in the next six months.

“Starts reached their trough earlier this year and are going to be on a very slow path to recovery through the rest of the year,” said Zach Pandl, an economist at Nomura Securities International Inc. in New York. “It does look like the recession is coming to an end.”

The leading indicators index, a measure of the economy’s likely path over the next three to six months, is due from the New York-based private research group on May 21.

Commerce’s housing report may also show building permits, a sign of future construction and another component of the leading index, rose 2.7 percent to a 530,000 rate in April from the prior month’s record low.

Comment by cactus
2009-05-17 20:21:42

15052 Penasquitos Dr San Diego CA 92129 4 beds, 2.0 baths, 1,610 sq ft

Close For Sale: $409,900 Contact Agent
——————————————————————
Irritating this place is just as expensive as Moorpark CA 93021

I sold a Townhome in Moorpark for 400K 3 years ago and don’t plan to spend a penny more for a house back in Cali. less would be better because I’m a cheap ;-)

Comment by cactus
2009-05-17 20:24:31

And I plan to rent for the first year at least. No need to be hasty I’ve waited this long and in the blasting hot desert to boot.

Comment by Olympiagal
2009-05-17 20:42:03

I’ve waited this long and in the blasting hot desert to boot.

Ah, I remember the desert. Hot.
Okay, then, TWO chilly beers. Plus a potato.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by cobaltblue
2009-05-17 21:04:17

Yes, well, ahem, the 110 degrees here in Mesa, AZ today was what we would call “toasty”.

Or “hot”. But that’s somewhat over-used.

As in: Not being British, many American men like their women “hot” and their beer “cold”.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by mikey
2009-05-17 21:00:45

Oh, a storm is threatning
My very life today
If I dont get some shelter
Oh yeah, Im gonna fade away

R. Stones :)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-05-17 21:03:29

British housing bubble displays evidence of successful punchbowl respiking operations. Given the Fed’s massive montetary stimulus, can U.S. housing prices have long to wait before they start going up as well?

U.K. Home Sellers Raised Asking Prices in May, Rightmove Says
By Jennifer Ryan

May 18 (Bloomberg) — U.K. home sellers raised asking prices in May by the most in more than a year as buyers’ access to mortgages improved and the number of properties for sale dwindled, Rightmove Plc said.

The average cost of a home climbed 2.4 percent from April to 227,441 pounds ($347,000), the operator of the biggest U.K. residential property Web site said today. That was the largest increase since February 2008. The 61,000 total of new listings this month is the lowest May reading since 2003.

“A drastic lack of supply is putting upward pressure on prices,” Miles Shipside, commercial director of Rightmove, said in an interview with Bloomberg Television. “There is increased demand among buyers and slightly more mortgage money becoming available.”

Comment by combotechie
2009-05-17 21:27:20

“A drastic lack of supply is putting upward pressure on prices.”

“A drastic lack of supply”.

Lol.

 
 
Comment by knifecatcher
2009-05-17 22:26:37

I have been lurking since 2004? early 2005 on this site, and Ben will eventually get credit for his singular work in showing how the world really works. Still have the first blogspot site bookmarked. Something really big is happening, and I do not think that it will end with things as we found them.

Has anyone noticed that a movie about the Illuminati is beating out a movie at the Box Office based upon the ideas of the Illuminati? Dan Brown’s Angels and Demons is about the link between reason and faith- Illuminati/Masonry vs Pope. A good read, whatever your opinions.

Star Trek is based upon the show created by Gene Roddenberry-a strong mason with a vision of the future as one world, all getting along for the sake of science and the good of life. Roddenberry is so revered by Freemasonry that he has one of only 3 permanent exhibits at the Scottish Rite Temple in downtown DC. (Others are J Edgar Hoover and Albert Pike-kinda odd)

Dan Brown’s next book is about Washington DC.
Barack Obama is (reported to be) a 32nd Degree Mason.

Things are not what they seem. If anybody is big into understanding what is really happening without sounding like a conspiracy freak, I would be interested in seeing how this links to the financial chicanery of the last several years. I am too deep to comment much, so would love to hear if someone is paying attention to what is going on.
I want to thank all of you pro and amateur economists for keeping this blog a fascinating guidepost. The prescient comments made over the years have amazed me in their accuracy. I hope that all of you made-or didn’t lose- money from this historic debacle that will forever change our country and the world.

 
Comment by Matt_in_TX
2009-05-18 17:06:23

Sorry if this has already been discussed. (Didn’t see it above. Perhaps it was in a previous Journal)

http://finance.yahoo.com/real-estate/article/107041/House-Price-Drops-Leave-More-Underwater

House-Price Drops Leave More Underwater

by Ruth Simon and James R. Hagerty
Monday, May 18, 2009

I thought this quote was interesting:

Mr. Humphries of Zillow calls his methodology conservative and said Zillow’s use of pricing for individual homes provides a better measure of home valuations than Mr. Zandi’s approach, which relies on market-level estimates of home values. He adds that Zillow doesn’t include foreclosures in its pricing models.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post