August 6, 2009

What Color Is The Sky In Your World?

by NYCityBoy

This is the second interview in my Regular Guy series of interviews.

My story is very similar to many people on this blog. I was born smart and handsome. Those around me recognized my tremendous athletic abilities early in life. At the age of 13 I lifted my first Volkswagen. My charm and good looks allowed me to sail through life. Oh wait, that is the fantasy world that exists only in my mind. I am supposed to be doing a post now for Ben Jones’ Housing Bubble Blog. I have to get back to reality. I just hate reality.

People generally have two worlds in front of them. They have the real world and the fantasy world. The way things are, and the way we want them to be, seldom have much in common. As adults we should be able to recognize the difference. Unfortunately, we see time and again that people too often choose to live in the world of fantasy, and ignore the real world. This varies from person to person and from subject to subject. When it came to the housing bubble all HBBers can probably see that the vast majority of the people around us chose to live in the fantasy world they had constructed. The population of that little world was bursting. It was a demographic explosion.

Early in 2005 I found myself in a place that often does not resemble the real world. It is called New York City or The Big Apple or Gotham. It is a place that attracts poets, dancers, actors and dreamers of all sorts. That is what is so odd. I found reality in this Mecca of fantasy. My baptism into the world of reality was helped along by $600,000 condos in Williamsburg, Brooklyn and $800,000 lofts in Harlem. Sometimes we see the ridiculous fantasies of those around us and it springs us into reality. That is what happened to me.

I turned to “alternative” information sources to find out what was going on in the world. The best information source I found was The Housing Bubble Blog. And soon a child, no, a boy, NYCityBoy was born. I was born a citizen of The Real World. I was baptized by the fire of the insanity of those around me.

Most of us are probably old enough to remember those glorious days of the Soviet Union and the Iron Curtain. I really miss the hairy armpits of those East German lady sprinters. Stories of defections were always great fodder for newspapers and television. It was like our side was winning, our nation was winning, when a diehard commie came over to our way of life. Following that example I went to work to get as many of my friends and family to defect to “our side”. My email rants could be two sentences or ten pages. The message was always the same. “You are living in a fantasy. Come over to the real world. We have plenty of space.” I hammered away, day after day, week after week. I had few victories to my name. The borders did not need to be manned.

One of the people on every “defection” email I ever sent was my buddy Dylan. This is a guy that has been a friend for more than 20 years. He was always the rock of our group. He is responsible and honest. His integrity cannot be questioned. He is the type of guy that has so much self-control that he can say, “I’m only going to eat 11 M&Ms” and then eat only eleven M&Ms. That is self-control. I have often turned to Dylan for guidance.

When I first started my emails I sensed that even Dylan was raising an eyebrow at my proclamations. Another friend called me “Chicken Little”. He has since repented. Others thought that I had gone nuts. That would not be a surprise. I have always been the, ahem, adventurous one of our group.

Dylan has agreed to be interviewed to give his thoughts on the Housing Mania and the mess surrounding it. This gives us yet another perspective from which to see this mess. Dylan is in great shape financially but he still has to think of the future. I would guess there are a lot of regular guys like Dylan out there. Let’s hear what he has to say.

When you first started receiving emails warning you about the housing bubble and its potential financial fallout what did you think?

Well, I agreed that housing prices were too high, but I didn’t realize the magnitude or what the real fallout would be. At first, I thought that the housing prices would stabilize and stay flat for a while and maybe go down a little, but not crash like it did. I knew housing prices were way out of whack when I’d go to some open houses/Parade of Homes and the prices of all these McMansions were twice as much as I’d pay for the house – it was nuts. Hell, even the appraised value of my house was too high.

I kept asking the same question over and over – who are all these people that are buying these huge homes and what do they do for a living? I never did get a good answer to that one. We make pretty good money and I didn’t think we could afford these homes – I thought I needed to get into another line of business. I was naïve in that I didn’t realize how low the lending standards had become. Looking back, we probably could have bought an $800k house. Actually, that’s not saying much. I could have lied on the application and bought anything I wanted.

Did you agree or disagree?

Like I said – a little bit of both. I had a good source from a person I trust, so I did take the warnings seriously. I didn’t always take all the advice, but I believed him. I guess part of me didn’t want to believe him – I wanted to continue to see my retirement plan go higher.

I assumed people would need to start taking responsibility for the giant mortgages they took out and if they couldn’t afford it, they’d lose their house and learn their lesson. I never expected the Government to bail out everyone and their brother. Well, I guess they are not bailing out the homeowners. I personally don’t think anybody should get bailed out. These banks and other financial institutions are getting rewarded for making some really bad decisions.

Were you reading or hearing that kind of outlook from any other source?

No

If “no”, why do you think that is?

The media doesn’t investigate anymore – they just spew what the “experts” say as gospel. Apparently, Journalism school doesn’t teach much anymore – the media are glorified Administrative Assistants to the experts/elites. Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke were the experts, so anything they said was golden. Therefore, there was rarely a dissenting viewpoint. At least none that anyone took seriously.

At what point did you think that the economy was in trouble?

Good question – I’m not really sure. Having been forewarned, it never came as a shock. I guess I wasn’t really worried until late 2008 when the “financial crisis” really went into full gear. Every day the market went down further and further. Then when the Government started bailing everyone out with billions, then trillions, of dollars that we didn’t have – that’s when I started getting scared and mad. It pisses me off that all the people and businesses that took unnecessary risks - either loans they knew they couldn’t afford or giving loans they knew the person couldn’t pay back, etc. - they all get bailed out. What about the responsible people? They get the distinguished pleasure of paying for all this crap. Where’s the incentive to be responsible, to save, to stay out of debt? It’s all ass-backwards.

If you could turn back the clock to 2005 what would you do differently?

Housing-wise, nothing. Actually, I thought it was great. We took advantage of the low interest rates and refinanced twice to lower rates and shorter terms – without cashing out! Imagine that! So, we went from a 30 year to a 20 year and finally to a 15 year at 4.875%. We don’t plan on moving any time soon, so we should come out ahead in the deal. Our house will be paid off right when our oldest starts college.

If I had a crystal ball, I would have bought financial stock, and gold, in 2005 and then sold the financials in early to mid 2008 and then ultra-shorted them and/or placed puts on them all until the end of 2008.

If you didn’t have kids would you do things differently?

Yeah – I wouldn’t have any 529 plans. Actually, no. Having kids doesn’t change the fact that both my wife and I are savers and don’t like debt. If we didn’t have kids, we’d probably travel more – things like that, but nothing else financially.

Are there any people you know that got themselves in trouble because they believed the hype?

Believe it or not, no – at least not yet. My mom sold her house during the boom times and got more money than the house was worth, but at the same time, she bought a new townhome at a higher than normal price, so it was close to a wash. Fortunately, most, of the people close to me are responsible with their money and didn’t do any crazy refinancing, at least as far as I know. Of course, most everybody I know lost a bunch of money in the stock market, but I don’t know anyone in real “trouble”.

How severe did you think the economic downturn would be?

Would be or will be? Honestly, I was never sure.

We are getting some nice relief right now, but I think we are in for much worse times ahead. Unless we get this ridiculous spending under control we are in big trouble.

Do you believe Ben Bernanke when he says the recession is near an end?

Ben Bernanke’s an idiot.

Would you want to buy stocks right now?

I have a hard time buying right now with the run up we’ve had. I’m a little too nervous that things are going to catch up to us. If I were (buying stocks) I would be very, very choosy.

How about real estate?

I’ve never been interested in real estate.

Do you believe the people around you are prepared emotionally for another big drop?

No, they’re not emotionally prepared. I think people are going to get pissed off at all these congressmen for spending all this money when the $hit hits the fan.

What is your opinion of the level of financial sense of the majority of the people around you?

On a scale of 1 to 10 I would say about a 3. I think they just listen to whatever everybody else says. It’s more of a herd mentality.

What is your outlook for the financial future of the United States?

Dismal. If we don’t stop spending money like drunken sailors, I’m very afraid of what is going to happen.

Do you worry about the economy your sons will inherit?

Of course! I not only worry about the economy they will inherit, but also the country they will inherit. Financially and culturally, our society has never been worse off. And it appears it will only get worse. It is very sad. Our founding-fathers would be very disappointed in us.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

89 Comments »

Comment by Housing Wizard
2009-08-06 08:56:18

God ,a interview with a normal person . That was so refreshing that i don’t even need to drink water all day .

Comment by tgun
2009-08-06 10:05:10

Got one for the blog- I am sure that someone with a little more creativity than I can alter these wonderful lyrics to mirror the current fantasy life… Enjoy!

Fantasy (by Aldo Nova) 1982

City nights, summer breezes makes you
Feel all right
Neon lights, shinin’ brightly makes your
Brain ignite
See the girls with the dresses so tight
Give you love, if the price is right
Black or white, In the streets there’s no
Wrong and no right, no

Outta site, buy your kicks from the man
In the white
Feels all right, powder pleasure in your
Nose tonight
See the men paint their faces and cry
Like some girls, it makes you wonder why
City life, sure its cool, but it cuts like a
Knife, it’s your life

So forget all that you see
It’s not reality, it’s just a fantasy

Can’t you see what this crazy life is
Doin’ to me?
Life is just a fantasy, can you live this
Fantasy life?
Life is just a fantasy, can you live this
Fantasy life?

So forget all that you see
It’s not reality, it’s just a fantasy

Can’t you see what this crazy life is
Doin’ to me?

Life is just a fantasy, can you live this
Fantasy life?
Life is just a fantasy, can you live this
Fantasy life?
Life is just a fantasy, can you live this
Fantasy life?
Life is just a fantasy, can you live this
Fantasy life?
I know, I know

 
 
Comment by JimO
2009-08-06 09:01:01

Nice post! Your comments and Ben’s site have been extremely useful to me. Thank you.

As an aside, just got back from Peru and their construction bubble is still inflating. Don’t look to emerging countries to save the day.

 
Comment by robiscrazy
2009-08-06 09:12:01

Financially and culturally, our society has never been worse off.

NYCB,

Your buddy sounds very rational. I’ve always thought that deep down our problems are a moral and cultural crisis. What do you think your good friend means by “culturally….society has never been worse off?” Can you elaborate?

Comment by patient renter
2009-08-06 10:01:11

I assumed this was a reference to our culture of consumption and debt.

 
Comment by DennisN
2009-08-06 12:00:31

Well the country is more mired in “pop culture” than at any time in the past. Think “pro sports” and “stupid pop music” for two of them. Most culture has been eviscerated by commercial forces. Think Hanna Montana and the evil hate crime that is “rap music”.

What’s wrong with college sports and classical music?

Comment by aNYCdj
2009-08-06 12:46:20

Dennis:

click on my handle I dont think you will find “stupid pop music” there.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2009-08-06 15:12:13

You sure won’t! Click on that handle and report to the dance floor.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by VaBeyatch in Virginia Beach
2009-08-06 13:16:24

Not a fan of spectator sports myself. Think they are overpaid. Is pop music even big anymore? I thought that industry sort of fell apart after the record companies were slow to adopt new models.

Commercial rap music is pretty bad, but there is good underground stuff. Youtube Paris, Jesse Dangerously, Sage Francis, Kool Keith, etc. Some classical is okay, some jazz is okay, etc. Every genre has gems.

 
Comment by EastBayTom
2009-08-06 14:20:38

The biggest problem with today’s society is the same as it has always been, intolerance and closed mindedness.

“the evil hate crime that is “rap music”.”

It’s not like some forms of art that we enjoy today were ever frowned upon in the past…. thinks like rock, jazz, impressionism…

Get over yourself, just because you don’t enjoy something doesn’t make it an “evil hate crime”.

Comment by DennisN
2009-08-06 15:03:36

So EBT,

You would excuse the Nazi party for killing off the jews because, well, we should be tolerant of their mode of self-expression and ethnic pride?

If there’s any intolerance, I’d say it belongs to the purveyors of “rap music” whose lyrics consist mostly of “kill the pigs, beat the hos”.

Rap music, the Nazi party, the Ku Klux Klan….there really is a difference between right and wrong, and good and evil. Taking a stand against wrong and evil is hardly intolerance.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by pismoclam
2009-08-06 16:13:33

Regular Guy - Reminds me of the moniker the late Rodney Dangerfield used in a little film several years ago. Loved the scene when his future Puerto Rican son in law shot him in the a– with a zip gun.

 
Comment by knockwurst
2009-08-06 17:51:47

The nazis loved wagner and beethoven, and so do I. That doesn’t make me a nazi. Not all rap music is an evil hate crime.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-06 17:58:28

C’mon, denizen- you’re showing your age. Everything you say about rap was said about punk, rock and roll, jazz, blues, etc. Don’t let the bands the big boys create and promote color your view of a whole genre of music.

 
Comment by mikey
2009-08-06 18:12:24

I was born a regular guy and although I wasn’t actually born in Minnestoa, I was raised by my family to be tall, handsome and play by the rules and to be squeaky clean too.

Today I stop and look at around and look at this national mess and the impending doom and have one question.

“Sheesh…What time did the Freakin’ Reality train leave the station…Did I miss the train man ?”

**Today, I am still alive and kicking, combat trained and can be rapidly armed and feel at times disillusioned like William Foster in the movie “Falling Down”**

Dude…just don’t ever eyeball my Toca Bell Burrito Supreme and we’ll probably both live long heathy and productive lives.

“Yo Quiero Taco Bell,” nothing is the same forever…RIP little dog
:)

 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-08-06 18:40:28

C’mon, denizen- you’re showing your age. Everything you say about rap was said about punk, rock and roll, jazz, blues, etc.

Well said, Alpha-Sloth.

You don’t like it? Don’t listen to it.

Me? I wouldn’t be caught dead listening to Wagner, particularly those turgid operas — but I ain’t gonna stop you from enjoying it. And I wouldn’t call it a “hate crime,” either, even though Wagner’s fans did quite a bit more damage than hip hop’s …

 
 
 
Comment by DinOR
2009-08-06 14:55:10

DennisN,

I’ll have to agree. About the only form of culture left ( and I’m almost loathe to say this aloud? ) that’s been unmolested is Flamenco. In the early 90’s it was able to stave off exploitation by guitarists that were trying to “graft” it onto the electric and thankfully it died on the vine.

I don’t have anything against pop culture per se, it’s just the way we morph everything into a sales pitch to promote a product/lifestyle prdt. How many commercials have they used Wagner in already? We’re in a constant state of having everything we once held dear, hostage to advertisers latest whim.

 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-08-06 16:18:24

DennisN-
Or just ageless American Classics like Gershwin, Irving Berlin, Harold Arlen,etc… My nieces and nephews (all teens) are in private schools and they didn’t know who Irving Berlin was. How sad is that.I bored them to tears with a lesson.

After 15 yrs of no TV in our home, your comments are music to my ears. We bought a Conservatory Grand Piano and I am learning to play. At least Pink Floyd, Led, Yes, Jethro, and Motown, had real talent.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2009-08-06 16:50:11

And Slim is eagerly awaiting your first album!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-08-06 17:23:10

Slim -You’ll be waiting until the cows come home. I love my fellow beings too much to torture them.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-08-06 17:25:46
 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-08-06 19:44:56

“This Land Was Made For You & Me” was a reputtal to Berlin’s “God Bless America” according to Michael Feinstein.

Paul Simon won the first Gershwin award, but Garfunkle should have been a co-winner imo. Dennis, S & G are now in my head.
In an interview on NPR, Paul Simon said he wrote “The Sounds Of Silence” sitting in his parent’s house bathroom, in the dark, in the middle of the night.

My sister’s fil use to have Zubin Mehta (Conductor) and Henry Miller (Writer) to dinner at their Beverly Hills home. He was a famous musican.

 
 
Comment by DennisN
2009-08-06 17:27:51

A good place to educate your kids is getting two Simon & Garfunkle albums: Wednesday Morning 3 AM and Sounds of Silence. The earlier album was a beautiful and sincere recording with acoustic instruments: the later often the same songs with overdub of way too much commercial backup tossed on top.

I was raised in a non-cultured blue-collar household, and didn’t discover classical music until college (about 1973). I never looked back. There’s 1400 years of music in the classical cannon.

America is a great country, and one way of gauging this is to consider our three greatest patriotic anthems. One was written by a poor Russian-jewish immigrant, one was written by an English lawyer, and one was written by a young Lesbian. Tolerance indeed.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Mot
2009-08-06 22:10:35

Francis Scott Key was a lesbian?

 
Comment by hip in zilker
2009-08-06 23:06:20

who cares? :-D

 
Comment by hip in zilker
2009-08-06 23:07:38

thespian perhaps?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by DennisN
2009-08-06 09:27:29

The media doesn’t investigate anymore – they just spew what the “experts” say as gospel. Apparently, Journalism school doesn’t teach much anymore – the media are glorified Administrative Assistants to the experts/elites.

I debate a point with my nephew, who is a journalist at a major web-based news organization. My thesis is that his org has a profound liberal bias, and his response is that there is less a liberal bias than a lazy group-think mentality.

I’m guessing we may both be right, along the lines of doofus Pauline Kael. She’s famous for a remark after Nixon’s victory. “Nixon just couldn’t have won the election: none of my friends voted for him!” :)

I’ve spoken with my nephew about the curriculum at a J-school these days. My guess would be it’s heavy on history, poly-sci, and economics. My guess was wrong.

Comment by robiscrazy
2009-08-06 10:18:33

I’ve spoken with my nephew about the curriculum at a J-school these days. My guess would be it’s heavy on history, poly-sci, and economics. My guess was wrong.

If your guess was wrong, what IS the curriculum these days?

Comment by B. Durbin
2009-08-06 13:01:09

When I took broadcasting classes*, the journalism aspects seemed to be very narrowly focused on how to write in a particular fashion, and to not use words that were too difficult.

I honestly missed a question because I didn’t catch that “epicenter” was too “difficult” a word. I explained that, no, I was from California and the local news used it all the time.

Then again, I realized quite early on that particular teacher was an idiot, so I mostly sat back and did the work while she was talking.

*I started off in engineering, then decided that wasn’t what I wanted and had to come up with a major that could be finished in seven semesters (stupid pre-reqs) before my scholarships ran out. While I’ve gotten jobs on the strength of the degree, I think of my actual major as liberal arts, philosophy, and theater.

And boy it was strange to change from heavy technical nerds as classmates to fluff-heads. I agree that the major problem with journalism is laziness and stupidity. The workers are outnumbered twenty-to-one.

 
Comment by DennisN
2009-08-06 15:21:44

I never really got a straight answer. Apparently the curriculum includes “journalistic writing” and topics from the “communications” major.

 
 
Comment by X-philly
2009-08-06 10:20:51

“Apparently, Journalism school doesn’t teach much anymore – the media are glorified Administrative Assistants harem girls to the experts/elites.

fixed

City -
enjoyed your article

Comment by aNYCdj
2009-08-06 12:48:05

How about airhead chicky-poos?

————————————————
Administrative Assistants harem girls

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2009-08-06 10:37:45

When I was a college kid, I worked on the school paper. The editors insisted that we, the reporters and photographers, major in anything but journalism.

Why? Because it was a weak major, and our university had no intentions of changing that.

So, on the staff we had people majoring in history, political science, economics (I was one of two econ-istas), engineering, and business.

We learned our journalism skills at the paper. And it was good training.

Comment by InMontana
2009-08-06 12:21:31

We have a J school here and I attended it. It was a “green eyeshades” school as opposed to a “communication theory” school. The curriculum was mostly writing, editing and law. A survey of university grades around that time showed that the grading was pretty tough and least prone to inflation but I think that was due to the aging faculty. It’s probably all different now.

I learned a lot about our local govt from one old teacher who soon retired. He managed to make it interesting but it was due to his experience and jaded viewpoint and not due to curriculum.

In the job market it seemed the regional papers and local TV stations wanted someone with a journalism degree, but the elite big city and national publications & networks want the lib arts major from a top university.

 
 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2009-08-06 09:27:35

“Are there any people you know that got themselves in trouble because they believed the hype? Believe it or not, no – at least not yet. My mom sold her house during the boom times and got more money than the house was worth, but at the same time, she bought a new townhome at a higher than normal price, so it was close to a wash.”

This is how its “different this time.”

For the interviewee and his circle, this is like the 1980s NY housing bubble and bust. First time buyers got screwed, though who sold at inflated prices and moved somewhere outside the bubble cashed in, and everyone else was unaffected. In NY, it’s Deja Vu.

Elsewhere, however, you had more houses bought by speculators, and more people who used their homes as ATMs — and thus many long time homebuyers as screwed as the peak level first time buyers. And there aren’t as many places outside the bubble for people to have moved to.

It’s all the low-grade speculators, HELOCs and refis that really turned the housing bubble into an economic wrecking machine. All made possible by loans that should never been allowed.

 
Comment by exeter
2009-08-06 09:31:48

“At first, I thought that the housing prices would stabilize and stay flat for a while and maybe go down a little,”

This is the prevailing response I got back in 2006, 2007 and early 2008. Another widespread favorite was “it will just plateau”. Most often it was said with an attitude of arrogance and anger.

Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2009-08-06 10:19:36

When people told me this as a response to my whole rent/price and income/price argument, I would say “If it’s going to plateau until fundamentals support it, then I will still be better off renting until the fundamentals come back. Since it’s cheaper to rent than own, I will build up a down payment fund until then and buy with a larger down-payment and higher salary.”

They would look all surprised at this. Then they’d be unbelieving when I told them I’d rather buy at 14% interest rate than 4%. I’d then explain that a large down payment gains in value as rates go up forcing house prices down. I also said I’m uninterested in buying until 20% is required.

Comment by polly
2009-08-06 10:38:34

Math is a rare skill and the most basic of understanding of economics (plain old application of supply and demand) even rarer.

The blank stares I got when talking about wanting to wait until interest rates and credit standards were higher were legion. And when I explained that both issues were directly caused by my possesion of a substantial downpayment, I might as well have been back in high school trying to convince the cheerleaders that the math team was a lot of fun.

No one understood that a large downpayment is much more valuable when higher interest rates have driven down prices. No one understood that being part of a very small group of buyers with cash puts you in a better position when it is negotiation time than just being one of many who don’t have to put anything down.

I’d try to explain this stuff and one co-worker would just shrug and say, “you have to take some risk sometime.” He lives in a one bedroom 5th floor walkup with a wife, a kid and a dog that can’t handle the stairs anymore. Want to bet that wasn’t his plan when he was telling me my decision not to buy because I couldn’t afford anything I wanted on a fixed rate fully amortizing loan was cowardly?

It was depressing.

Comment by hip in zilker
2009-08-06 11:23:25

“I might as well have been back in high school trying to convince the cheerleaders that the math team was a lot of fun”

love that!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-08-06 12:57:09

Polly:

Buying a condoze in a 5th or 6th floor walk up has got to be the nuttiest idea ever. The endless possibilities of failure

just sprain your leg…or get a touch of arthritis….those 5 flights will look like Mt Everest.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Anon In DC
2009-08-06 13:06:40

Hi. Polly is the knee 100% now ? Did the co-worker in the 5th walk-up buy the place before he got priced out forever and now is forever stuck there ? Or did he not buy and take the risk ?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2009-08-06 14:41:59

I’m guessing he’s priced in forever. (Or until he finally walks… down to the moving store to GO GET SOME BOXES!)

 
Comment by polly
2009-08-06 15:54:50

Not sure if he is priced in forever as I really don’t know the exact location or when he purchased, but I thinj he was talking from the “I did it a while ago and now I am rich” place not the “I just did it and you should too” place. This was around early 2007. No idea what they will do when the munchkin has to go to school. Most people move to Fairfax or Montgomery county around that time.

Last doc’s appointment for the knee was yesterday. I hopped up on the table and waited for him sitting with my legs crossed (half lotus position). He walked in, took one look, and said (Greek accent), “Ah, that is a good way to sit. I see you are all better, now.”

Yeah, I was showing off. It is still a little sore on occasion, but much better. Currently trolling craig’s list for a bike.

 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2009-08-06 15:57:37

Polly, the CL bike ad you referenced the other day looks like a good deal. I say go for it.

 
 
Comment by CA renter
2009-08-08 02:13:31

Loved your story, polly.

I can relate 100%.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by DinOR
2009-08-06 11:29:45

sfbb,

Well.., I wouldn’t go so far as to say “20% is required” but I get your point. Since I’ve always gone VA, their loan guarantee ( which is all the program really is ) basically serves as the DP.

I think the big difference ‘is’, most Vets fully understood and appreciated the difference. In order for us to be able to save for a large DP would have meant for much higher taxes for everyone ‘else’?

But VA is an exception in every sense of the word. Hate to say it but a lot of guys were kind of miffed they were passing out zero down loans to anyone that could fog a mirror.

Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2009-08-06 14:39:56

DinOR, I don’t mind VA as long as it’s ALWAYS ONLY for vets. I think our servicemen and women deserve a little extra consideration for the service they give our country. When FHA and Freddie and Fannie are throwing out virtually no-down (or worse) it causes a problem.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Michael Viking
2009-08-06 10:33:01

I heard “it will plateau” a lot as well. My response was that “plateau” was enough to end the game, because plateau implied no more serial refinancing and no more serial refinancing would be the first domino. It seemed pretty obvious.

 
 
Comment by Mike in Miami
2009-08-06 09:42:15

Great post!
What is your outlook for the financial future of the United States?
It will suffer the same fate of any irresponsible borrower only this time there won’t be anybody to finance a bailout. Not sure how much longer we can keep it together. Japan is in a similar situation. Their government debt to GDP ratio is 200% versus ours which is at 80% and rising fast. The difference is that the Japanese debt is largely financed by its own citzens while ours is mostly financed by foreign entities/suckers. Just like the housing bubble, this might go on longer than you think, but it can’t go on for ever. When the feces hits the fan the US dollar is the most likely victim, but this still might be a decade off. Other governments are in similar shape, Iceland, Britain, Ireland, Spain, Greece, Lithuania, Estonia, Italy, Belgium to name some of the most fiscally irresponsible. The entire Western World will have a very rude awakening once the giant debt bubble explodes. Paper currencies will be the equivalent of CDOs.

Comment by Julius
2009-08-07 10:58:35

Mike,

It seems as though the Baby Boomers have decided that their “legacy” to future generations will be an enormous mountain of public debt. I’m not sure how we continue to keep it together either; my faith is steadily weakening in the US gov’s ability to keep spending under control, and I’m not sure how we continue to be able to persuade foreign governments in investing here.

I think this will ultimately be a “double dip” recession akin to the one that happened here in the early 80s. It will probably be much harsher and longer than that one, however. The difference this time around is that Obama and Bush threw a much larger (indeed unprecedented) amount of capital at US banks and manufacturing in an attempt to “stabilize” the market. As a result, the stock markets have rebounded somewhat and the illusion is emerging that the “recession is over” when the deep-down issues (excessive public and private debt, excessive public spending, inefficient and irrelevant American manufacturing corporations that refused to get with the times, bank dishonesty, overdependence on real estate taxes for state funding, the ongoing real estate collapse, etc) have not been dealt with to any meaningful degree.

 
 
Comment by DennisN
2009-08-06 09:47:28

Well, I agreed that housing prices were too high, but I didn’t realize the magnitude or what the real fallout would be.

This is similar to my thoughts. I knew RE prices were too high, especially in bubbly areas like the SF Bay Area, but failed to see that dropping prices 30-50% there would be followed around the country and that this would drag down the overall economy - and the stock market - with it.

At the beginning of 2006 my net worth was spread about like this:
RE - 65%
stocks/bonds - 25%
cash - 10%

After selling the house in San Jose, the spread was more like this:
RE - 25%
stocks/bonds - 25%
cash - 50%

It was pure luck and laziness that I was so high in cash when the crash came.

Comment by Tim
2009-08-06 09:54:06

“It was pure luck and laziness that I was so high in cash when the crash came.”

I wish more ppl could admit: “It was pure luck that I was so high in real estate when the bubble came and my failure to reap all of the benefits thereof was the result of my own laziness, greed and/or ignorance” and would stop acting like selling for prices more in line with historical pricing ratios is somehow giving it away.

Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2009-08-06 10:23:14

I had a realtor tell me that their clients weren’t going to just ‘give it away’ when I said the house price was too high.

I said “Interesting, because it’s my cash, and I’m not going to just ‘give it away’ either.”

I had MY realtor ask me when we were lowballing and deciding not to respond to a ridiculous counter offer “Are you going to be sad if you don’t get the house?” to which I responded “I don’t get emotionally attached to houses. I’m emotionally attached to my cash.” That made her laugh.

Comment by CA renter
2009-08-08 02:18:01

Excellent responses, sfbb.

If you don’t mind, I’m going to use the “not giving away my cash” line, too. :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Anon In DC
2009-08-06 13:13:04

I sold a place in 2005 too. Luck partly. My brother and I shared a house and was getting married. I did not want to buy him out. He went to wife’s house. The price simply made no sense. Not sure whether I found this site right before or after selling (I think after) I thought I might move from the suburbs zip 22030 (Fairfax, VA) to DC to avoid commuting. But even studios were close to $300K. You can get one now for ~$200K. And RE agents and mortgatge brokers were telling me that I could “afford” places that were 5 times my income. None of it added up.

 
 
Comment by The_Overdog
2009-08-06 09:48:48

I think I know about 3 people who were eaten up in the mania.

1) Friend who got a decent sales job and bought an Escalade, 20′ wakeboarding boat, average, but new house, and then put in a huge pool & spa, all in about 2 years. Things aren’t going so well now, but he is falling behind but surviving. I figure by next year, most of it will be gone.

2) OC mostly retired relatives who have HELOC’d the heck out of their house to pay for their lazy children and gamble in Laughlin. They are still making it due to sticky prices in Huntington Beach, could be doing great if they’d kick their lazy kids to the curb.

3) The motherload: A former co-worker who purchased 20 houses in about 2 years, many of them section 8’s. Most immediately underwater and near worthless. Spent about 2 years trying to hide income so he could declare bankruptcy. Came out of that smelling like a rose and ready to “learn from mistakes made the first time”.

Comment by nono nana
2009-08-06 12:36:35

My poster-idiot for the housing boom is an ugly middle aged woman who in the first six months of 2006 used mortgage fraud to purchase two condo conversions in WPB (at $160k now selling for $18,500), a house in Lehigh Acres for $210k (a recent short sale at $90k after her attempts at a lease to own rip off failed), a house in LA for $1.2 that now appraises at $550k, and a hole-in-the-wall dump that passed for a gym (which she quickly finished off and is now out of business).

She’s a professional ‘investment advisor.’

Comment by Bill in KS
2009-08-06 20:06:46

“She’s a professional ‘investment advisor.’”

someone else to never take advice from

 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2009-08-06 09:53:07

“…it was nuts. Hell, even the appraised value of my house was too high.”

Is there a connection between temptation & desire & the ability to get something for nothing ($0.00 % down)…or is that just “old school” human emotional psychological Dr. Phil crap? ;-)

Comment by tgun
2009-08-06 10:14:57

Same here, had many a call (before the “do not call list”) from mortage boiler rooms.

I remember one of them, it went something like this;

“Hello Mr. Smith this is screwuover from Mortgages r us, how would you like to have hundreds of extra dollars in your pocket each month?
By refinancing your mortage with the cash-out option, you can pay off your outstanding high interest debt like credit cards, car loans, personal loans, into a lower single monthly payment…”

“Ok, so what is the interest rate?” “Well, it is an ultra low 2% for the first 6 months, then it begins to adjust after that, but don’t worry, you can refinance it in a couple of years into a fixed rate while pocketing all that extra cash in the meantime.”

“What are the closing costs?” “They vary, but typically between $7,500 and $10,000, but don’t worry, we can include that into the new mortgage.”

“Well, thank you for calling, but since I don’t have any debt besides my mortgage, and am quite happy with my 5.5% fixed rate which I pay extra principal every month so I can shave over 12 years off the original term and save myself tens of thousands of dollars, I really am not interested.”.

“You are one of the only people I have spoken to that doesn’t have any debt besides a mortgage…” click

So much for that call!!

But what about the other 99% that fit the “other” category? Up to their eyeballs in debt, looking for the rope to hang onto to keep from falling into the abyss? Refi, why sure, why the heck not? I can use a new truck/rv/atv/boat/vacation, wifey can use some plastic surgery/botox/breast enhancements/jewelry, kids can use some bling too…

Comment by DinOR
2009-08-06 11:23:00

tgun,

Wow, you rattled that off w/ such accuracy, it’s almost a little scary? You sure you didn’t work in one of those boiler rooms? LOL.

Yeah, and that was the steady drumbeat from 2003 until early 2007. Those guys sure had the “script” down pat didn’t they. I always remember them balking when I explained I didn’t have a credit card, almost in disbelief.

Comment by tgun
2009-08-06 11:44:10

Hi DinOR-
thanks, I’ll take the compliment!! No, never worked the phones for cold-calling. Been in marketing (product management & product development) since 1994 (engineering before that since 89 when I graduated from college).
The mortgage boiler room “script” was so hokie, how could anyone forget it!

I am sure any one of us on this blog could have written a better script…

oh, but wait- I think they were written with a target audience education level in mind… say 6th -8th grade perhaps?

Our script would not have made any money for the ptb.

have a good one,

glad to communicate with USAF alumni.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by DinOR
2009-08-06 12:22:44

“how could anyone forget it!” LOL.

Right.., how silly of me. It was only on the radio, TV, newspapers and telemarketing calls 24/7-365.

Speaking of which, has anyone heard from “Stanley Johnson” lately?

 
Comment by tgun
2009-08-06 12:43:18

or oil city PA? or was it oil city tim? Maybe turbotax timmie is really oil city pa- he was lurking here and it paid off!

 
 
 
Comment by sfbubblebuyer
2009-08-06 14:46:16

I got a few calls. It was shorter for me because I’d say “Uh, I rent.” and hang up.

Comment by EggMan
2009-08-06 16:10:47

“I never buy anything or donate money over the phone. Ever. Please do not call me again.”

{click}

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by DennisN
2009-08-06 17:53:32

Sometimes it’s easier to just put the phone down quietly and walk away. That wastes the maximum amount of their time.

I’m on the federal “do not call” list but they don’t appear to care.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-06 10:06:52

“Do you believe Ben Bernanke when he says the recession is near an end?”

Not sure myself when the recession will end, but a few points are worth bearing in mind regardless of when this occurs:

1) I believe the recession in progress is already the longest since the 1930s. The optimistic view is that this suggests we may be nearing the end of it, as no recession lasts forever. The pessimistic view is that the process of healing from the all-out meltdown on Wall Street last fall is likely to keep the economy in a state of malaise for at least several more years.

2) The National Bureau of Economic Research is the organization tasked with officially dating the beginning and end of recessions. They did not date the (official) beginning of this one until it was already in progress for nearly a year. There may be a similar time lag between what eventually is identified as the (official) end of this one and when they announce it.

3) Recessionary conditions have historically shown a tendency to linger long past the official end date as identified by the NBER. For example, the early-1990s recession was officially dated to have lasted from July 1990-March 1991. However, the official dating is based on the point when GDP stops dropping, not on when the housing market or labor market recovers. Generally speaking, the housing market and labor market recoveries tend to lag the end of declining GDP. For example, the lingering downturn in the largest state’s (CA) labor market continued for several years after the official end of the early-1990s recession, while the CA housing market did not bottom out (in terms of prices) until 1996 or so.

But maybe this time is different…

Comment by Raj Shah
2009-08-06 10:45:41

Ben Bernanke is not only idiot but he also pupet of wall street

Comment by VaBeyatch in Virginia Beach
2009-08-06 11:14:48

He’s much easier on the eyes though than Alan Greenspan. His beard is nice. Sounds much younger than he looks, oddly.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-06 18:23:50

“…much easier on the eyes though than Alan Greenspan. His beard is nice.”

Yeah, and he’s taller than mini-me, too. You getting lonely, Beyatch? Because you’re starting to talk crazy. Stockholm Syndrome.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Molly
2009-08-06 10:08:45

Terrific interview. I like this guy…he’s real and honest. How many people (interviewed by the MSM) can we say that about?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-06 10:29:54

“How about real estate?

I’ve never been interested in real estate.”

Would your interest level change if there were a real estate mania underway?

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-06 10:32:50

What is your outlook for the financial future of the United States?

Dismal. If we don’t stop spending money like drunken sailors, I’m very afraid of what is going to happen.”

The Keynesian doctrine which drives the economic rescue currently underway maintains that a country can spend its way out of financial problems. Time will tell…

Comment by sew
2009-08-06 11:20:15

Not working for Zimbabwe or Argentina or Mexco

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-06 11:29:00

Apparently it’s different there.

 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-08-06 18:51:07

Aladin, is that you?

What about the Mayans?

 
 
Comment by WT Economist
2009-08-06 11:29:52

What is your outlook for:

Japan: doomed by a rapidly aging society and high debt.

China: doomed by a poor rural population, a rapidly aging society, and having sought to provide for them by lending to the deadbeat USA.

Europe: doomed by a rapidly aging society and existing high tax rates.

India: the majority of its people are so poor, and its infrastructure is so bad, it’s doomed.

Africa: no resources, bad government means there will never be any.

Middle East: doomed by overpopulation relative to arable land, and political violence.

If this country didn’t screw up so much, it would be the least doomed of all. It’s absolutely ridiculous we are in the situation we are in.

Comment by DinOR
2009-08-06 12:26:40

WT Economist,

Well, at least you don’t have anything negative to say about either of the Poles? And it ‘is’ ridiculous we find ourselves here? Yep, sorry World, your (1) chance at Salvation was squandered for a bigscreen TV and elective surgery.

Sorry we let you down. Maybe next time.

 
Comment by Skip
2009-08-06 13:32:28

China: doomed by a poor rural population

I think that is an asset.

 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-08-06 18:59:26

If this country didn’t screw up so much, it would be the least doomed of all. It’s absolutely ridiculous we are in the situation we are in.

Look over your list again.

Despite our chronic f*ck ups, we may still be the least doomed — at least for the time being. As Farmer Ted famously referenced himself (RIP, Mr. John Hughes!), we still appear to be “King Of The Dipsh!ts.”

 
 
 
Comment by rms
2009-08-06 11:59:08

“Our house will be paid off right when our oldest starts college.”

+1 Awesome!

Why is it:
-that working families get loans?
-that “po-folks” receive grants?

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-08-06 15:03:55

..These banks and other financial institutions are getting rewarded for making some really bad decisions…

It’s a matter of avoiding a systemic financial breakdown.. first the banks fail, then businesses fail, and then we’re all unemployed.

Sure, banks screwed up. Is denying them support our first priority? Is punishing them so important?

How many people who answer “Yes!” would protest bank-screw-ups by quitting their jobs?
Nobody.
Well, quit your job or be fired when your employer goes tits up…. what’s the difference?

Comment by polly
2009-08-06 15:59:04

Or you could find a solvent employer.

Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-08-06 17:01:57

i can’t think of a business that could survive in a credit vacuum.. nor one that doesn’t ultimately require a healthy retail customer base.

That’s the thing.. we tend to think our income or job might be secure even if most people are unemployed… but we’re very much dependent on each other on all levels.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-06 18:29:42

that would solve everything

 
Comment by Happy2bHeard
2009-08-07 12:50:14

I see no safe haven. Even the healthiest of employers, including government entities, are cutting positions.

When your chair is the one that’s removed from the game, you are out of luck, even if you are one of the better workers. Teachers, firefighters, prison guards, and other government workers aren’t safe.

The corporations that succeed in weathering the recession will be those that figure out how to be more productive with fewer workers. Agility is key.

The workers that succeed will be those that are focused on the value they bring to the organization. If your employer is healthy, also make sure that your group is a net contributor and not a net drain. Again, agility is key. If you are not in a good place, move.

If you are unemployed, good luck! Having been unemployed several times, I know how hard it is to get work in a recession.

 
 
 
Comment by cactus
2009-08-07 08:24:33

“Do you worry about the economy your sons will inherit?

Of course! I not only worry about the economy they will inherit, but also the country they will inherit. Financially and culturally, our society has never been worse off. And it appears it will only get worse. It is very sad. Our founding-fathers would be very disappointed in us.”

I suggest you read ” the fourth turning” by Strauss things may change history is not linear. And look at the stock market is the Bear Market over? Did the media hype the severity because it was mostly Bankers that got axed and they have been the power center in this Country ( I hope that changes at least ) ?

My brief summary on the “Fourth turning” we are now entering a Winter after a 20 year unraveling ( fall ) and the comming of age of Gen X the most unwanted generation arriving after the Boomers ( summer)most spoiled and self centered of all generations. meanwhile the Lost generation( spring) thoses comming of age a bit too late for WW2 is over it Midlife Crisis. The Hero Generation (winter ) is dead being the most productive of generations especially in awarding themselves money taken from the younger generations.

according to this book the Lost generation is the first generation that is wealthier in their old age than genX is in its prime?

I was born in 1960 last of the boomers just in time for Gen X

anyway I find this book fascinating, is it true ? If it is we are in for total war and a big change in the next 20 years.

cheers

 
Comment by uptick
2009-08-07 10:34:52

From yahoo news today. Seems too optimistic, based on what is going on with everyone in California: layoffs, can’t find a job, over-invested in real-estate, can’t sell house, pay-cuts and furloughs.

“Employers sharply scaled back layoffs in July, and the unemployment rate dipped for the first time in 15 months, sending a strong signal that the worst recession since World War II is finally ending.”

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post