August 8, 2009

Bits Bucket For August 8, 2009

Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here. Please visit the HBB Forum. And see the American Visionaries series from Schwarzfilm.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

227 Comments »

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 06:17:54

Good morning everyone.

The Sun’s rays are just peeking above the East Bay hills, the Moon is still up and shining in the west. There’s a touch of fog draping itself over the coastal hills. A rooster down the street is crowing. Best of all I am drinking my first cup of coffee for the day. Life is good.

Hope everyone has a great weekend.

Comment by desertdweller
2009-08-08 07:41:50

Ms SFOGal. Top o the mornin to ya.

And all hbbers.

 
 
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2009-08-08 06:18:03

Coffee time!

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 06:53:57

I can hear my SBUX whole beans (bought at a 20 percent deflationary discount) dripping into the pot from ten yards away!

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 06:58:49

I normally avoid StarMucks coffee because I believe it is overpriced relative to the wonderful selection of dark roasts regularly available at Trader Joe’s. But when I was shopping at Von’s the other night, I saw it marked down by 20 percent (first time ever I noticed StarMucks beans for sale!) and decided “What the heck.”

This raises an interesting statistical question: How does the BLS enter discounts into their Consumer Price Index calculation. For instance, if everything were suddenly market “20 percent off”, would that month’s CPI reflect a 20 percent drop, or no drop?

Comment by SDGreg
2009-08-08 07:24:17

This raises an interesting statistical question: How does the BLS enter discounts into their Consumer Price Index calculation. For instance, if everything were suddenly market “20 percent off”, would that month’s CPI reflect a 20 percent drop, or no drop?

Doesn’t BLS account for substitution when prices are rising? For example, steak gets too expensive so you buy hamburger instead. You spend the same amount so CPI is flat, even though you’re really getting less.

Does it work the same way when prices are falling? You now substitute the discounted premium brand for the old price of the off brand, spending the same as before except getting more.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 07:31:00

They use something called the Fisher Index (aka chain-weighted) methodology to try to properly account for substitution over time into cheaper goods of comparable quality.

But my question was on something more basic: If a good is sold on a special offer at a discount , does the discounted or the “regular” price enter the CPI calculation?

 
Comment by prsxr
2009-08-08 07:35:52

Every time I buy something at Lowe’s, I get a receipt coupon for $10 off $50 purchase, a 20% discount. Even a $10 pack of AA batteries comes with one of these. I try to accumulate purchases to make up $50. I’m seeing more of this type of offer from other stores as well. Is this a way for the store to play accounting games rather than just have extensive sales?

 
Comment by Bad Chile
2009-08-08 08:25:50

Maybe I’m just grump-tacular this morning, but I think the BLS just decides what it wants the statistic to indicate then back figures how to get to that result. You know, they want a CPI target of 3% and think the masses will swallow that and it will keep the old people happy. So they figure out what nonsensical yet plausible manner by which to convince enough people the number means something without too many media inquiries.

For example, the price of computers used in the index has been dropping for years because the BLS figures if you buy a computer that has twice the processing power for the same price as last years’ computers, you got it at 50% discount.

Never mind the whole reason you bought a faster computer is so you could run a bloated version of the same word processing software.

Speaking of deflation, was at Kohl’s this morning buying Mini-Chile some fall duds. Didn’t pay more than $2.00 for a single item, most were 90% off during the “Power Hour Sale”. I can’t figure out who would spend $16.00 for a pair of jeans for a 6-month old boy. But at $1.60 (and I had a 15% off coupon on top of that, making it $1.36), I figure he needs a pair of jeans. Daddy also got a mean Led Zepplin t-shirt for $3.24.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 08:27:17

The only way I can think it would enter in (unless they have some magic formula) is if, when they check the prices of the standard items they follow, they would enter any sale price on those items as the current price. But I don’t know how they follow the prices, since different stores have the same items at different prices, and some stores will match competitor’s prices, double coupons on some days, etc ad absurdum.

 
Comment by scdave
2009-08-08 08:42:08

Speaking of deflation ??

In classic cars also….I am at “Hot August Nights” in Reno Nevada right now…I went to the auction yesterday…Generally speaking the cars that are selling (mostly without reserve) are @ 60 cents on the dollar vs. the last couple of years…I am going again today…

 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-08-08 09:41:10

Generally speaking the cars that are selling (mostly without reserve) are @ 60 cents on the dollar vs. the last couple of years…I am going again today…

I’m hoping to see that deflation in vintage guitars and basses soon. Sales are soft and prices are down somewhat, but — like housing — the discounts have in no way approached the absurd level of run-up over the past decade.

 
Comment by Captain Credit Crunch
2009-08-08 10:21:08

scdave,

I bought a Porsche 911 Turbo (2002) just recently for about a 40% discount over 2007 pricing. Been having a blast and don’t feel like I spent an absurd amount on a car.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 12:51:10

“I’m hoping to see that deflation in vintage guitars and basses soon.”

Ditto on the violin / bow front. Don’t know whether you see this in the guitar arena, but one trend I have noticed in recent years, with the absurd inflation of older, highly sought fine quality violin prices, is the incursion of a new generation of high quality violin makers, filling a large product niche supplying highly capable musicians with little bank. But the next five or so years may be a good time for long-term buy-and-hold violin investors to afford an instrument of much higher quality for what the same money would have bought circa credit bubble peak (~ 2005).

 
Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-08-08 15:08:28

… is the incursion of a new generation of high quality violin makers, filling a large product niche supplying highly capable musicians with little bank.

A similar trend occurred in the guitar world, with lots of boutique makers springing up with all sorts of high-quality products — not just instruments, but effects pedals and tube amps, too, often based on relatively rare but sought-after vintage designs. There could be a glut of these goods on the market soon, as the HELOC money for such pricey niche items has long since blown away.

 
Comment by DennisN
2009-08-08 15:32:47

I’m surprised at the quality of some of the budget violins these days. I picked up on eBay a “Stringworks” artist violin set from a guy who developed arthritis for something stupid like $350 and it’s far superior to the cheap fiddles of years gone by.

Maybe someday I’ll have the funds to take some lessons. :(

I took ‘cello in college but found 1) my hands are really small for a guy and 2) being left-handed my left hand is the weaker of the two. I’m probably better off with the violin.

 
Comment by Shendi
2009-08-08 16:30:25

I’m in the market for a nice guitar. I prefer the gibsons- especially the ES335 type. Don’t mind the les paul standard either. Anybody have any idea where one can get a good used ES335?

Also I’m thinking about the concours as a crossover motorcycle. Anybody hear any bad reps on this bike?

Thanks

 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2009-08-08 17:57:03

I’m still hoping to happen upon a CF Martin acoustic at a garage sale for $50 because the seller has no idea what it is. But, being realistic, I’ll settle for a 70’s era Gibson Hummingbird at a good price. I’d also like a vintage Les Paul, though the prices are quite revolting at this time.

 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-08-08 09:46:38

The Albertsen’s “Java Delight” beans are about 60% of the price you pay for the Starbucks, Peet’s or “Seattles Best,” but tastes as good.

French Roast is just about done brewing.

Good to relax with after my two mile swim!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 09:58:20

I forgot to mention in my post above, but several of the Trader Joe’s brands taste better than the StarMucks, including their french roast, which is the variety of StarMucks I tried. I suspect the StarMucks brand survives because of people who are brainwashed by watching teevee commercials (I don’t watch teevee).

 
Comment by yensoy
2009-08-08 11:39:27

I am assuming you already know “Seattle’s Best” is owned by SBUX.

FYI Peet’s is qualitatively superior to just about every other coffee out there, Tully’s is a close second. Most of TJ’s beans are pretty ordinary, although some standouts are the ones from Rwanda and the South American one in a black bag with the bird on it (I forget the name).

 
Comment by desertdweller
2009-08-08 13:18:04

Bill in LA, pool water is way cooler with desert temps diving to around 100. brrr. Don’t know how many miles swum, just 1 hr.

And other guys, can’t wait for vintage car prices to come down further. VW Karman Ghia. or VW bug….can work on those.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-08-08 13:44:01

I like the old muscle cars (to try to recapture lost youth). My heart’s into them, but my mind wins out so I drive my modest Toyota economy car. It’s in great shape of course and I only drive it within a 2 mile radius in a typical day. a 2003 model and only 51,000 miles. A keeper!

My young supervisor drives a Lexus. Probably still making payments on it. There are swarms of $30k millionaires in the Los Angeles area.

 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-08-08 14:58:48

“There are swarms of $30k millionaires in the Los Angeles area.”

(from another L.A.’er)
Bill, you’re not kidding. During the car leasing bubble, all my co-workers had leased luxury cars. My car has been paid off for 10 yrs. now.

 
Comment by MadBoy
2009-08-08 17:52:21

FWIW, original VW Bub sedans are easier to work on than supers and convertibles.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 19:33:49

“There are swarms of $30k millionaires”

Plenty of Lexus leasers around San Diego, too, I’d have to assume…

 
 
 
Comment by desertdweller
2009-08-08 07:43:50

Hope you got a good nights sleep this time, mr bear.

no more bad news books late at night…

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 07:46:14

It was excellent — probably due to a late night at the ballpark, watching the Padres crush the New Yawker’s ball team’s hopes with a ninth-inning grand slam home run on a 3-2 count. Awesome!!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by DennisN
2009-08-08 08:25:39

Soggy morning here in Boise. We just had a record two day rainfall for August here in Boise, although it had the effect of stopping the heatwave in its tracks.

Speaking of heatwave I haven’t seen Stpn2me in a couple of days. Geez I worry about that guy. Most people don’t have the daily crap he has to put up with. Pashtuns tend to get rowdy in really strange ways.

Comment by In Montana
2009-08-08 09:36:51

great wasn’t it? we got over 2 inches here in one day.

 
 
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 06:23:05

I forgot to add, the hummingbirds are starting their daily dance and intimidation around the hummingbird feeder.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 06:52:50

“…daily dance and intimidation…”

What’s the payoff?

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 07:08:25

Food. :)

Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-08-08 07:50:21

food.. yum.. but i guess you gotta catch about a hundred of them to make a decent meal..

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 10:19:12

I’ve heard it’s considered a delicacy in certain parts of the world.

Also, Praying Mantis catches and eats hummingbirds
Not only does the insect catch the bird, but it ‘impales’ it with it’s forelegs, ripping the bird’s chest open. 359 Million years of evolution sure gets you some serious skills

- birdwatchersdigest.com

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 10:20:55

:)

 
Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 14:42:01

What are you laughin’ at? SanFranGirl? That’s morbid info.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 14:55:25

I am laughing at joey’s comment. My one about the Praying Mantis showed up after the laugh due to the infamous filters.

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-08-08 15:21:36

captivating little creatures.. an aunt and uncle were really into them.. had many expensive looking hand-colored drawings, sketches and photos around the house.. feeders in the yard. I recall their two main excuses to visit China were to bird-watch and square dance on the Great Wall.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 16:49:16

I love watching them. When I sit outside (the feeder is about 10 ft away), I will occasionally get buzzed by them. Once in awhile, one of them will hover right in front of me.

The other day, three of them were drinking from the feeder at the same time. This doesn’t happen to often.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 16:50:41

Are there pictures of your aunt and uncle square dancing on the Great Wall? That just sounds so neat.

 
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 07:15:47

You’ve gotta eat a lot when your heart beats ~20 times per second!

Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 14:44:18

You got to think a lot too. :) Something has to think, anyway…, because, if something don’t think, ya may get ja butt in trouble with child support! :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2009-08-08 07:19:20

Took Mr. Cole to the 11th annual Kern Valley Hummingbird festival last week…saw lots of the lil’ Osprey-F-35 raptors zipping around…we meet a lot of really cool “birders” & talented crafts folks & musicians…learned some things about river habitats…fun day …free! :-)

Comment by desertdweller
2009-08-08 07:46:18

Hwy, met some birders while we were leaving Paraguay and they were up to over 3,000 different types of birds.
Gosh. Learn something new everyday. Thought there were only, well alot less than that.

Comment by Lane from s.c.
2009-08-08 09:07:40

Hey Desert….are you from Paraguay? I was there feb. 3 1989 when $hit hit the fan. Gen. Rodregus over threw Pres. stroushner (spelling?). One heck on a night…I was in the military at the time and the only mil. there. Very lonely feeling in a coup with only 5 of your buddies.

Lane

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 09:25:08

6 guys in a coup? You needed a wagon.

 
Comment by desertdweller
2009-08-08 13:22:10

Nope, just had business so flew in and out a few times.
Such poverty is incredible.

I was in Grenada when the peoples revolutionary army took over though.. after that there were machine armed guards at the airport. skeery.
Glad you made it out okay, Lane.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-08-08 06:33:23

Banks - Thanks for the bailout. Now what is this about mortgage modifications?
Scott Van Voorhis August 6, 2009 09:00 AM

After getting untold billions in various federal bailout specials, you would think the nation’s largest lenders could play ball on mortgage modifications.

Apparently not, as is clear in the coverage by the Globe and other media outlets of the Treasury Department’s new report card on mortgage modification efforts by the big lenders.

The Obama Administration earlier this year rolled out $50 billion in incentives to prod lenders to help modify the mortgage of as many as four million distressed homeowners.

So far, only a meager nine percent have been signed up for a three month trial modification program. Basically, make your payments during that period and it goes permanent. But the biggest banks couldn’t even meet that rather anemic threshold.
Bank of America, which holds as many as 800,000 mortgages considered eligible for reworking, had modified just 4 percent, while Wells Fargo had restructured just six percent of its share.

Anyway, by accident or design, the Globe’s business also ran a story today on a local lawyer taking some of these very same lenders to court over their mortgage lending practices.

I’m typically skeptical of lawyers filing class action suits. But after reading about all the bank foot dragging, I had found it hard not to cheer on the Boston attorney Gary Klein. He’s seeking class action status for his suits against lenders Bank of American Home Mortgage and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage.

Klein is taking aim at mortgages that grow larger over time, with unpaid interest building upon the principal, until, say five years out or so, the borrowers on are the hook to pay the whole thing back. Well, what a deal.

Klein, in his suit, contends the lenders knew – or should have known – that the borrowers would ultimately be unable to pay.

For what it’s worth, Bank of America has released a statement blasting the suit “without merit’’ while Wells Fargo said it had not yet been served with a complaint and couldn’t comment.

Maybe loan modification is a pain for many of these big banks, who feel they’ve got bigger things to worry about.
That’s pretty short-sighted – and potentially disastrous given the legal and political backlash that’s brewing.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 06:51:47

“After getting untold billions in various federal bailout specials, you would think the nation’s largest lenders could play ball on mortgage modifications.”

Why? Would it be in the interests of a bank’s shareholders to throw away money on workouts of loans that are hundreds of thousands of dollars underwater? I truly don’t grasp what on God’s earth this fool is talking about.

Comment by james
2009-08-08 11:35:44

I think there might also be a lot of calculation on the banks part. See how much blood they can squeeze from the borrower first. Then tack on randomly large amount of fees. Then see how much they can sucker the government into paying.

I’m guessing the number of people dropping out in the “credit exile” is going up dramatically. No longer appearing on welfare/unemployment rolls.

The same people will be moving about, to avoid being thrown into jail by the fine generation departments, aka the police. My insight into the lawless areas, aka the countryside, isn’t real good. I’m expecting quite the large population explosion there. Plus a plethora of undocumented people. And it isn’t going to just be a bunch of mexicans.

I got hit with a couple of petty tickets. I could pay them but could see plenty of other being totally crushed by them. Actually not me, but my wife got them. Failure to come to a complete stop and not having the registration card. Poof. 700$ gone. A lot of people would just not have food money.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 19:44:49

“I got hit with a couple of petty tickets.”

Me too, last fall. Luckily we have savings, but wifey was quite livid. I honestly did not change my driving habits, but area police have become far more aggressive in their ticketing practice.

By contrast, we recently drove around several European countries (primarily German speaking ones). We saw no accidents, no tickets being issued and not even any police over the course of hundreds of driving miles.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by rms
2009-08-08 22:28:56

“…and not even any police over the course of hundreds of driving miles.”

Yup. And when do see ‘em their not dressed for combat either.

 
Comment by rms
2009-08-08 22:30:23

their = they’re

 
 
 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-08-08 06:55:44

Bank foot dragging?

You think banks should give the failed flippers and specuvestors more time, money and forgiveness?

Sure.. lets modify all the millions of bad mortgages out there and drag this thing out for-freakin-ever.. If that ain’t shortsighted, i dunno what is.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 11:05:18

I read up a little more since yesterday on the subject of “nonrecourse.” I quote here from a book I borrowed from the library, Barron’s Real Estate Licensing Exams / Salesperson, Broker, Appraiser (J. Bruce Lindeman, Ph.D. and Jack P. Friedman, Ph.D., MAI, CPA):

NONRECOURSE / Carrying no personal liability. Lenders may take the property pledged as collateral to satisfy a debt, but have no recourse to other assets of the borrower.

So it sounds like if California is a NONRECOURSE state, then underwater homeowners (with only primary mortgages) can safely walk away from a mortgage loan provided they are willing to return the home to the bank. Selling the underwater property becomes the bank’s problem. Am I missing something here? Why aren’t more people doing this? Or does the MSM under-report?

Comment by palmetto
2009-08-08 11:55:09

“Or does the MSM under-report?”

Yes.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2009-08-08 15:06:17

That’s interesting.. I’ll save you the trouble of re-reading yesterday’s posts. I never argued the point.

I’m sure that whichever laws apply will be applied.. but it doesn’t change my view that if you can repay a debt and fail to do so, you’re a low life, unworthy of my time and consideration. You’ve screwed someone out of what’s owed them, and are likely to try doing it to me.

There are plenty of ways to somehow profit while being deceptive, selfish, greedy, and unfair while acting strictly within the law.
You yourself regularly accuse banks, corporate executives, Wall Street, and the Fed (to name a few) of using such tactics, and I don’t ever expect to hear you so vigorously defending those entities based on what’s strictly lawful and what’s not..

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 20:04:46

“…if you can repay a debt and fail to do so, you’re a low life, unworthy of my time and consideration.”

So many lenders made countless ginormous loans compared to their borrowers’ permanent incomes. It is hard to fathom why reasonable people (especially those with training and experience in financial services) could not see where this would lead.

To solely blame ignorami borrowers with no training in finance for not realizing that banks were suddenly loaning out unrepayable sums of money seems very one sided to me. And for a banker to label such borrowers as ‘low lifes’ borders on the ridiculous. If these people are so scummy, why did bankers loan them so much money? Legally walking away from an unrepayable debt is a business decision, not a crime.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 20:16:49

“…if you can repay a debt and fail to do so, you’re a low life, unworthy of my time and consideration. You’ve screwed someone out of what’s owed them, and are likely to try doing it to me.”

Low life status is far easier to avoid if you face no hard budget constraint.

Wall Street Journal
* AUGUST 8, 2009, 12:40 A.M. ET
Geithner Asks Congress to Increase Federal Debt Limit
By COREY BOLES and MICHAEL R. CRITTENDEN

Washington — U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner asked Congress to increase the $12.1 trillion debt limit on Friday, saying it is “critically important” that they act in the next two months.

Mr. Geithner, in a letter to U.S. lawmakers, said that the Treasury projects that the current debt limit could be reached as early mid-October. Increasing the limit is important to instilling confidence in global investors, Mr. Geithner said.

The Treasury didn’t request a specific increase in the letter.

It is critically important that Congress act before the limit is reached so that citizens and investors here and around the world can remain confident that the United States will always meet its obligations,” Mr. Geithner said in a letter to lawmakers.

Mr. Geithner said the that it is “clearly a moment in our history” that requires support from both Democrats and Republicans for the increase.

Congress has never failed to raise the debt limit when necessary,” Mr. Geithner said.

 
Comment by desertdweller
2009-08-08 21:30:01

Does that count the excessive interest that is impounded second by second by banks and credit card corps?
The continual miscalculation of real charges, the late crediting of payments?

Seriously, not everything is black and white. But the corps would want to devastate any and all folks. JMHO.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-08-09 05:02:57

Professor:

You really have to take this seriously….they hired the dumbest most clueless kids to process the loans….their critical thinking ability was ZERO…

AND THEN THEY GOT PROMOTED AND PROMOTED

How on earth did so many make $100K+/yr. and then whine about being underwater on their 6 investments in floooriddaH?

We never saw it coming…..actually PB that is a very true statement if you are an airhead!

——————————————
It is hard to fathom why reasonable people (especially those with training and experience in financial services) could not see where this would lead.

 
 
Comment by DennisN
2009-08-08 20:28:03

As I said yesterday, the expression “non recourse” is a layman’s - or a journalist’s - oversimplification of the law. The bank can’t go after the borrower for a deficiency after a non-judicial (i.e. “short form”) foreclosure but CAN sue for a deficiency after a judicial foreclosure. The bank gets its choice, although in normal times the overwhelming choice is to take the easy road and get a non-judicial foreclosure.

I just know someone somewhere is going to get nailed for the deficiency and whine “but this can’t happen because I live in a non recourse state”. Too bad - you didn’t read the fine print.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by DennisN
2009-08-08 20:42:57

I guess the other point is that the courts can’t enforce a deficiency suit because of a STATUTE in the civil code. However the powers that be in the legislature are free to REPEAL that statute any time they wish.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 20:08:33

“…lets modify all the millions of bad mortgages out there and drag this thing out for-freakin-ever…”

I agree this is a terrible idea, akin to repeating the Japanese mistakes in the early-1990s banking crisis (which, BTW, continues to date). But nonetheless, isn’t this pretty much what is being attempted?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 06:59:54

“Maybe loan modification is a pain for many of these big banks, who feel they’ve got bigger things to worry about.”

Do you mean like trying to keep their heads above water (i.e., making a profit) during the worst banking crisis since the 1930s?

Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-08-08 07:11:34

So then the question becomes how to do the banks make a profit if the houses are foreclosed on? Presumably via lucrative fees incurred during the processing of said foreclosed houses? Not that I agree with any of this though it does seem a bit one sided in its current form.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 07:22:16

The New York Times
Lucrative Fees May Deter Efforts to Alter Loans
By PETER S. GOODMAN
Published: July 29, 2009

(Photo: Alfred Crawford wants to sell his house in Los Angeles. As it adds fees, Bank of America has blocked his efforts.)

This week, the Obama administration summoned mortgage company executives to Washington to demand they move faster to lower payments for homeowners sliding toward foreclosure. Treasury officials called on the companies to hire and train more people quickly to field applications for relief.

But industry insiders and legal experts say the limited capacity of mortgage companies is not the primary factor impeding the government’s $75 billion program to prevent foreclosures. Instead, it is that many mortgage companies are reluctant to give strapped homeowners a break because the companies collect lucrative fees on delinquent loans.

Even when borrowers stop paying, mortgage companies that service the loans collect fees out of the proceeds when homes are ultimately sold in foreclosure. So the longer borrowers remain delinquent, the greater the opportunities for these mortgage companies to extract revenue — fees for insurance, appraisals, title searches and legal services.

“It frustrates me when I see the government looking to the servicer for the solution, because it will never ever happen,” said Margery Golant, a Florida lawyer who defends homeowners against foreclosure and who worked in the law department of a major mortgage company, Ocwen Financial. “I don’t think they’re motivated to do modifications at all. They keep hitting the loan all the way through for junk fees. It’s a license to do whatever they want.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by bobo4u
2009-08-08 18:34:54

The government’s been deregulating the banking industry for eons now. So, Obama thinks a little meeting is going to make them start acting honorably? Yeah, that’ll work.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 07:04:28

“That’s pretty short-sighted – and potentially disastrous given the legal and political backlash that’s brewing.”

Realistically, what is the worst that could happen? I suppose many of them could go bankrupt and get taken over by the government — IndyMac, Countrywide, Washington Mutual, Accredited Home Lenders, MEW Century Mortgage and numerous others whose names I don’t recall off the top of my head come to mind.

It doesn’t seem very likely at the moment that we will see some kind of replay of the French or Bolshevik revolution, either of which would give bankers much bigger things to worry about than Joe the Plumber’s mortgage workout.

 
Comment by SDGreg
2009-08-08 07:30:28

Maybe loan modification is a pain for many of these big banks, who feel they’ve got bigger things to worry about.

The size of their executive bonuses this year, for example…

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 07:36:32

I went on quite a rant about that topic not too long ago. I feel much better now, having gotten the bile out of my system…

 
Comment by James
2009-08-08 08:29:16

Well. I’m guessing if we look at the meat of the modifications a few things will be clear.

1) Loan balances are not decreased
2) Large fees are generated and paid from federal funds
3) New loans are also ARMs/balloon payments/50yr terms/IO

So, the money is just keeping the doors open till someone needs their money and the thing collapses. Bankers are probably purchasing hideaways in strongholds to hide their wealth. Bet a lot of real dollars and gold is going into the Bahamas or some such place. Estates are being purchased.

I’d personally like to thank Obama for continuing on with this little game of wealth transfer. Its been a slice watching it.

I’ve been saying for a while; the banks are shells that only exist to enrich insiders. Be real interesting to see what the old money people are doing right now. My guess is finding shelter from what is coming.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 10:01:33

“So, the money is just keeping the doors open till someone needs their money and the thing collapses.”

A rolling loan gathers no loss.

“I’d personally like to thank Obama for continuing on with this little game of wealth transfer. Its been a slice watching it.”

The Obamanomics Team is sure proving adept at helping banksters play shell games with vacant REO. BwaHaHaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by rms
2009-08-08 20:28:19

“The size of their executive bonuses this year, for example…”

Chinese executive executed over corruption

By China correspondent Stephen McDonell

Posted Fri Aug 7, 2009 5:27pm AEST
Updated Fri Aug 7, 2009 5:25pm AEST

A Chinese airport executive was executed today after being convicted of corruption charges.

Li Peiyang was the head of a major Chinese state-owned company which runs several airports - including the Beijing Capital Airport.

He was convicted of bribery and embezzlement worth $19 million.

 
 
Comment by desertdweller
2009-08-08 07:48:43

WHEN are the tar and feathers coming out. You would think americans would be heating the cauldrons right about now.

Comment by GrizzlyBear
2009-08-08 08:10:26

The complicit MSM has done a nice job of sweeping everything under the carpet, where the rotting elephant corpse lies.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 08:43:02

I still say that if the people get really riled up and start taking it to the streets, the PTB will give everyone ‘emergency’ free cable with all the movie channels, and the masses will happily go home to watch uncensored Desperate Housewives. (Or the game in HD.)

Comment by skroodle
2009-08-08 09:11:02

A free Xbox 360’s would keep everyone inside and occupied for months.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2009-08-08 09:26:00

All seriousness aside though, if there’s going to be any benefit to “taking things to the streets”, someone needs to come up with a plan of what happens next. Tarring and feathering isn’t going to solve anything if the system remains as before.

 
Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-08-08 09:47:24

Free Xbox? Not if you want the one that was autographed by Sarah Palin and listed on E-bay.

http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/08/sarah_palin_xbox_the_replica.php

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-08-08 09:54:59

Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss. - we’ve been through this when we realized the new Prez is just more of the same as the old prez, but by a factor of five times more of the same.

 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2009-08-08 10:55:51

Maybe the Obama team should threaten to margin call all those loans to AIG. Banks felt good buying crap loans because they knew they could insure them. So, let AIG go belly up, and let the banks fly solo without insurance. When banks come crawling for more bailout money when everything defaults and there’s no AIG to pay the claim, THEN slap the banks with conditions.

The banks need to be taught which side of the bread is buttered.

Comment by GH
2009-08-08 17:05:10

Right now, banks are working under the rule heads I win tails you lose!
As a nation we missed a gigantic opportunity to get our banks under control by making the bailouts “conditional”. Naturally given the corrupt and incestuous nature of our government and corporations all we did was make the biggest banks even more powerful, while their competition was swept away in the storm. I cannot help but wonder if this was not all well thought out in advance.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Kim
2009-08-08 08:12:52

Why is it necessarily the bank’s decision whether to modify or not? If you are a senior tranche MBS holder (which may or may not be a bank), there isn’t much incentive (yet) to agree to any modifications. Forclosure is (still) the problem of the junior and mezzanine tranches, no?

Comment by FB wants a do over
2009-08-08 09:39:41

Appears the FDIC, federal reserve and or taxpayer could be on the hook for the foreclosures.

From the “UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
FIFTH TRANCHE REPORT TO CONGRESS” FEBRUARY 6, 2009

Since Treasury’s Fourth Tranche Report to Congress, Treasury completed its second transaction under the TIP, investing $20 billion in Bank of America Corporation (Bank of America) on January 16, 2009. Under the agreement with Bank of America, Treasury purchased $20 billion of preferred stock and warrants from Bank of America, and will receive an 8 percent dividend, payable quarterly. As part of this agreement, Bank of America must implement rigorous executive compensation standards and other restrictions on corporate expenditures. As previously disclosed, Treasury has also invested in Bank of America through the CPP.

In addition, Treasury and the FDIC announced that they will provide protection to Bank of America against the possibility of unusually large losses on an asset pool of approximately $118 billion of loans and securities backed by residential and commercial real estate loans, and other trading book assets that have been marked to current market value. The large majority of these assets were assumed by Bank of America as a result of its recent acquisition of Merrill Lynch & Co. The assets will remain on Bank of America’s balance sheet. As a fee for this arrangement, Bank of America will issue preferred shares to Treasury and the FDIC. In addition and if necessary, the Federal Reserve is prepared to backstop residual risk in the asset pool through a non-recourse loan. As part of the agreement, Bank of America will be required to submit an executive compensation plan to Treasury and the FDIC for approval and to adhere to certain common stock dividend restrictions.

 
 
Comment by Anon In DC
2009-08-08 12:08:33

Hi. Don’t know whether Prof. Bear is being sarcastic or not but I agree with him. My understanding is that a big part of the bail-out is to save shareholders (pension funds.) Some spend thift borrower can’t get a loan modification ? Cry me a river.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 20:38:02

Perfectly illustrates the danger of everyone investing in the stock market as a means to retire. We can never allow the market to drop, because the generation retiring will get screwed.

 
 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2009-08-10 09:15:40

Banks don’t care about modifying loans now that they have a new business model - take the money directly from the taxpayers!

 
 
Comment by ACH
2009-08-08 07:03:31

Hey! The worst is over! The number of jobs lost was only 247,000. They must be reaching the bottom now that they have fired everyone. Happy days are here again!

So I have a question: How are we going to pay our house, payments, car payments, and send kids to school?

Oh, right, I’m dumb. We are going to HELOC the money because of the strong rebound in the housing market.

I didn’t get it for a second, there.

Roidy
P.S. Four large shots of espresso, two lightly buttered english muffins, one large glass of buttermilk. I’m ready to to start my day.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 07:07:07

“The number of jobs lost was only 247,000.”

I just submitted a nice long post on BLS lies, damned lies and statistics that relates to yesterday’s upbeat job announcement. Hopefully it will soon clear the filter…

“Four large shots of espresso, two lightly buttered english muffins, one large glass of buttermilk.”

Dang, Roidy — do you live in some kind of hedonist’s heaven?

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2009-08-08 07:12:13

“Four large shots of espresso…”

Man, with that much caffeine I’d be able to climb walls as well as Spiderman. :-)

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 07:14:01

One more cup of StarMucks and I am ready to head over to the racquetball court. My LDS (read: coffee-less) opponent is severely disadvantaged when we play at 8a Saturday.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-08-08 09:59:11

I experimented once by drinking coffee a half hour before swimming. Indeed, it’s like the sports docs say. You do improve your performance. I was doing interval sprints of 24 repetitions of 100 yards on a countdown timer and I noticed I had more time left over at the wall at the end of each sprint.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 10:03:03

“You do improve your performance.”

I’ve heard that even smoking bongs is not that bad for a swimmer’s performance.

 
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 07:23:55

“…some kind of hedonist’s heaven?”

I’m pretty sure buttermilk is the official beverage of hell.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 07:25:20

Not if it is properly blended with other pancake ingredients (especially maple syrup) :-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 08:11:07

baking ingredient in heaven, beverage in hell

(Kind of like Mark Twain’s quote, ‘heaven for the climate, hell for the company’.)

 
Comment by ACH
2009-08-08 08:19:27

I found that Louisiana dark roast coffee just didn’t have the kick that I needed. Yes, I used RTM, Union, Community (before they messed with the formula), CDM, etc. They just didn’t quite set the vibrate level where I like it.

Now, as for buttermilk, I recommend a tall glass filled with cornbread and buttermilk poured over it until brimming full.

THAT’s hedonist heaven.

Roidy
P.S. And yes, you are correct. I AM a wild eyed Southern Boy.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 09:08:33

this southern boy takes his cornbread with pinto beans

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 12:59:07

grits and butter, anyone?

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 21:58:52

y’allways gotta butter up them G.R.I.T.S.- but they’re suckers for it;)

 
Comment by ACH
2009-08-09 04:37:08

ROFLMAO!

Yes, they do like it.

Roidy

 
 
 
 
Comment by Asparagus
2009-08-08 07:14:30

Watch out! There’s a truck going 100mph and it’s going to hit you.

Wait, Good News! It’s only going 50mph.

phew…

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 07:24:06

Bad news: Because you were driving while looking out the rear-view mirror, you didn’t notice that brick wall twenty-five feet dead ahead of your decelerating truck.

Comment by scdave
2009-08-08 07:48:10

Pbear…You are one of the data miners on the board…I would post it but I don’t know how…On Tuesday, I believe, in the San Jose Mercury news there was a graph that showed the revenue decline to government the worst since the depression…It was so dramatic I cut it out and set it on my desk so I could look at it for several days…There is no way revenue is going to turn around quickly enough…IMO they can cut (nope) or raise revenue in a way that we can’t avoid it…Thats why I think the VAT is coming and coming in a big way…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by James
2009-08-08 08:37:38

Meh. Typical thing to expect. Hard to imagine the government finding itself able to increase taxes. It will further decrease velocity of money at this point.

Just expect lots of stimuli, rewards for friends of DNP and continual bulls*%$ while we work this off. It will probably take 25yrs. Hopefully the thing that keeps this from being a revolution is the people will remember the good in this system.

Eventually we will back away from all of this.

 
Comment by DennisN
2009-08-08 08:38:25

So they will apply VAT to the sales of houses to stimulate the housing market?

 
Comment by scdave
2009-08-08 08:50:17

apply VAT to the sales of houses ??

It will apply it to everything at all levels in the chain of delivery including services…Probably
going to make Craigslist & Ebay that much more popular…

 
Comment by SDGreg
2009-08-08 08:54:12

So they will apply VAT to the sales of houses to stimulate the housing market?

Is attaching some of these buyers to a house really value added?

 
Comment by scdave
2009-08-08 09:13:13

Just expect lots of stimuli ??
while we work this off ??

Is it really that easy…Just print money ??

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 09:13:19

much easier to inflate than to create a whole new tax

 
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2009-08-08 09:28:14

Hopefully the thing that keeps this from being a revolution is the people will remember the good in this system.

.. which is what again?

 
Comment by scdave
2009-08-08 09:49:15

much easier to inflate than to create a whole new tax ??

I understand that but doesn’t the bill come “due & payable” at some point or do we just default ??

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-08-08 10:03:53

Mebbe for once the federal government will do the right thing and make subtantial cuts in the unconstitutional programs and bureaucracies. There are hundreds of government organizations with lots of waste. Just cut! They waste trillions of dollars.

Citizens Against Government Waste publishes information about all the wasteful spending that can just be eliminated. If Arnold can do it in the state of California, it can be done at the federal level.

 
Comment by james
2009-08-08 10:40:22

Scdave,

I expect the stimulis to die off eventually but the lingering debt will be with us for a long long time.
A lifetime and a half.

And printing money has been going on for a long time. Its more of psychological/contractual game to handle how fast it happens.

That along with being on the wrong side of where the money is handed out. If you are first in line, aka big banks, its not as bad. For us, probably a bit more difficult. Thing is, the rich guys own so much and control so much at this point.

So, you are bombarded by MSM paid hitmen all day. Then you get frivlous suits against bloggers to keep disent from being allowed.

A large number of the people are too stupid to understand and another group are too absorbed in day to day to handle anything else.

This is a lot like the nightmare world imagined by Orwell.

The public health insurance sounds like another disaster waiting to happen. One more person tells me health care is a right is getting a good upper cut.

 
 
Comment by DennisN
2009-08-08 08:28:08

“Don’t look back - something might be gaining on you”. - Satchel Paige

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 09:31:16

“Who are those guys?” - Butch, to Sundance

 
 
 
 
Comment by SDGreg
2009-08-08 08:00:35

The number of jobs lost was only 247,000.

According to John Williams of Shadow Stats, the actual number of payroll jobs lost in July was probably closer to 600k, a wee bit higher than 247k.

Comment by skroodle
2009-08-08 09:13:00

The “seasonally” adjust the numbers. I believe that means adding extra jobs in the summer and around Christmas.

 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2009-08-08 07:06:36

http://www.retakecongress.com/

Peter Schiff, who needs no introduction on this board, is running for Chris Dodd’s Senate seat. Here’s a chance to replace one of the prime villains of the housing bubble, and our lunatic fiscal policies in general, with a sound-money advocate whose election will shake our Republicrat duopoly to its core. It’s time to for REAL change, not the sham Republicrat variety.

Comment by rms
2009-08-08 08:42:47

What’s his position on Israeli Palestinian issue?

 
Comment by DennisN
2009-08-08 08:46:56

That’s CT, right? Odd to see a state wind up with two independent senators.

The WSJ had an article about my congressman, Walt Minnick (D-Idaho) the other day. He’s pretty independent too, and he has to be. That “D-Idaho” tagline is pretty rare. ;)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204908604574334754074996882.html

 
Comment by Muggy
2009-08-08 08:48:52

Wow, the Retake Congress Non Partisan Platform gets right to it.

Muggy likey.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 09:17:12

Be interesting if both Schiff and Rand Paul won Senate seats. Unlikely, but interesting.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-08-08 10:07:18

I threw in $250 for Peter Schiff.

Comment by Muggy
2009-08-08 10:28:40

“I threw in $250 for Peter Schiff.”

He would have preferred gold, but, oh well…

Comment by sleepless_near_seattle
2009-08-08 11:04:17

Or Canadian oil trust stocks, but, oh well…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2009-08-08 13:43:52

and $250 for BEN……right????????

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 07:12:54

Tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theorists are enjoying the glory of their fifteen minutes of fame :-) Skepticism is a highly valuable tool when great financial crimes are prevalent and generally accepted without question, for fear of being labeled a conspiracy theorist.

Wall Street Journal

* AUGUST 8, 2009

For Group of Skeptics, the Truth Is Out There

BY GREGORY ZUCKERMAN

LAS VEGAS — Corporate conspiracy theorists, whistle-blowers and suspicious financial minds long have struggled to get an audience for accusations of business fraud.

But on the heels of the Bernard Madoff scandal and a host of smaller Ponzi schemes and misdeeds, these skeptics are enjoying newfound appreciation.

“We’re suddenly on Broadway, on the tip of everyone’s tongue,” said Lewis Freeman, who has a forensic-accounting firm in Miami. “Before it was off-Broadway, or even in Boston.”

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 07:18:18

Hi Madboy,

Just wanted to clarify my post from yesterday.

Raiders posters is Raiders of the Lost Ark. I also have Star Trek ornaments.

Comment by MadBoy
2009-08-07 19:02:29
Whoa there lavi, I’m one of those who wants a media room so I can hang my Star Wars, Star Trek, and Raiders posters

I think I’m in love - except for the Raiders, can I substitute the Packers and whatever team Favre is playing for this year? And can I keep my accumulable Star Trek ornaments up all year ’round?

Comment by MadBoy
2009-08-08 11:39:04

I also have Star Trek ornaments

Ships or characters?

Oh,oh,oh - tackietst home decor for a house on the market - every possible Harry Potter accumulable you could imagine. Figurines, posters, wands, cast pictures (hung in a more prominent position than grandchildren) - and not a just a few items, but a house full of the crap.

Almost as good as a house on the market I saw 5 years ago with 1/2 dozen snake cases and at least that many 50 gallon fish tanks.

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 13:41:36

Ships and a couple of the characters.

 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
2009-08-08 07:33:21

In a few weeks my wife goes back to work and I start my capstone course/process for grad school. The pregnancy is going well and she is due the 28th of October; I should be finished by the end of November. The next three months are going to be insane. I gotta post now while I still have some time left!

It’s unbelievable that when I started posting here I was only thinking about staring grad school and a family.

Comment by DebtinNation
2009-08-08 10:47:36

I hear you. I hadn’t even met my wife, and now we have a kid on the way.

 
Comment by CA renter
2009-08-09 03:12:06

Weird how time flies…and we are still renting.

Was posting here before our last baby was born, and she’s going to be 4 years old this October!

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 07:34:46

Treasurys are still essentially risk free, so long as you only focus on nominal dollar value and ignore the real value of the dollar.

Wall Street Journal

* AUGUST 3, 2009

The New Bond Equation

As the economy teeters between recession and recovery, bond-fund buyers need to be wary of multiple hazards

By MICHAEL A. POLLOCK

As the financial crisis heads into its third year, investors in bond funds are facing some difficult choices.

Investors usually turn to these funds for safety. But bond funds are facing a host of pressures that are driving down returns, raising long-term risk—and making it tougher to settle on the right investment strategy.

Take funds that focus on long-term Treasurys. These have often been an easy choice for a safe haven. But after frenzied buying of Treasurys last fall when the financial crisis became acute, prices have fallen as broader fears have eased and some of that money has come back out of the government-bond market. There’s also concern about the huge amount of debt the Treasury Department must sell to finance higher federal spending.

The result? Funds focused on these bonds are down 13% this year, according to Morningstar Inc. “Treasurys, which are considered the risk-free asset class, probably are the riskiest asset class right now’’ among fixed-income options, says Robert Gahagan, team leader for U.S. taxable bond investments at American Century Investment Management Inc.

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-08-08 10:11:23

Shouldn’t that be amended to “long term and intermediat term treasuries, which are considered the risk free asset class, probably are the riskiest asset class right now?”

T-bills are king.

Comment by CA renter
2009-08-09 03:13:33

That would be correct, Bill.

 
 
Comment by DennisN
2009-08-08 10:36:09

If bond funds have come down that far, doesn’t that make them more attractive to NEW investors? I’m so confused.

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2009-08-08 07:35:59

How I helped ruin the U.S. economy

“He became a top-producer. Most months, he sold $5 million in high-interest loans and earned $30,000. ‘My managers and handlers taught me the ins and outs of mortgage fraud, drugs, sex, and money, money and more money,’ he wrote.”

http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/article1025884.ece

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-08-08 10:15:17

They need to throw the kid in maximum security jail until he’s 75 years old.

Comment by kirisdad
2009-08-08 10:36:38

Max security???? But..but…but he’s a non-violent offender.

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-08-08 11:11:01

Fraud is non-violent? It’s a form of theft through misleading, AKA embezzlement. The kid knowingly did a fraud thing in a smaller scale than Madoff and in a different form.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by kirisdad
2009-08-08 12:14:50

Bill, you missed the sarcasm. There are a group of californians here that want only violent offenders imprisoned..or was that anyone that doesn’t agree with them imprisoned? I forget. Oh I remember, drug users and dealers should be on the streets and any one who arrests or prosecutes them should be in jail. And, of course, all RE agents and bank officials should have their heads cut off. In a perfect world I guess.

 
Comment by skroodle
2009-08-08 17:49:54

Maximum security costs more than $30k per year.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 20:46:22

Conditional release for MINOR non-violent offenders. Stealing millions, even for somebody else, ain’t minor. It’s not that complicated, unless you want it to be.

 
Comment by CA renter
2009-08-09 03:16:21

Comment by skroodle
2009-08-08 17:49:54
Maximum security costs more than $30k per year.

———————

But what are the costs of their crimes? IMHO, if it costs $50K to keep someone in prison, but they cost society $55K when they are out, then we are better served to have them locked up, no?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 07:40:57

Does anyone have an argument as to whether it is better to buy TIPS through a low-fee mutual fund (e.g. Vanguard) versus individual purchase?

* The Wall Street Journal
* AUGUST 3, 2009

The New Bond Equation

As the economy teeters between recession and recovery, bond-fund buyers need to be wary of multiple hazards

By MICHAEL A. POLLOCK

Have an Inflation Hedge

Should you worry about inflation? It depends on your time horizon. With so much slack in the economy, few economists see near-term risk. And funds that hedge against inflation were slammed last year as investors fretted more about deflation.

But the government’s stimulus efforts create potential for inflation to flare eventually. And despite its mission to limit inflation, the Federal Reserve will face strong political pressure to keep stoking economic growth as long as the economy is weak, says Ken Volpert, head of the taxable-bond unit at fund giant Vanguard Group Inc.

One option is funds that invest in Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS, whose principal amount is adjusted for changes in the consumer-price index. A low-fee option is Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities, which basically just owns TIPS. Morningstar also gives high marks to Harbor Real Return, which owns TIPS and some other types of bonds, and Pimco CommodityRealReturn Strategy, which owns TIPS but also uses derivatives to capture moves in commodities markets.

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2009-08-08 10:28:33

If you look at the portfolio of Vanguard’s VIPSX, it appears it’s a mixture of 5, 10, and 20 year TIPS. The management probably does competitive bidding to buy TIPS. There is also a 0.25 expense ratio, which is annual, right?

I buy 10 year TIPS quarterly from http://www.treasurydirect.gov and do the non competive bidding. There is no expense ratio on the “gubmint’s” investment site. I will probably start buying 20 year TIPS as well.

I’m not sure if Vanguard’s competitive bidding is significantly better than my non-competitive bidding to make the 0.25 annual expense ratio worth it.

Series I savings bonds are better in that your tax savings is compounded annually until you redeem the bonds. But the 0% fixed rate these 6 months discouraged me from buying any.

VIPSX portfolio
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/snapshot?FundId=0119&FundIntExt=INT#hist=tab%3A2

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 11:07:15

“Series I savings bonds are better in that your tax savings is compounded annually until you redeem the bonds.”

I used to buy savings bonds, until the gubmint essentially eliminated their competitive advantage as an inflation-hedge.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 11:09:14

“The management probably does competitive bidding to buy TIPS. There is also a 0.25 expense ratio, which is annual, right?”

It sounds like the question boils down to whether whatever advantage Vanguard gains through competitive bidding is sufficient to outweigh the expense ratio. I have no idea how to figure this out.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 07:44:01

SOL time for higher education in California… Thanks a lot, Ahnold!

United States
California’s universities in trouble
Before the fall

Aug 6th 2009 | LOS ANGELES
From The Economist print edition

California’s financial crisis jeopardises one of the world’s finest universities

Seed corn in peril at Berkeley

THE best public higher education in the world is to be found at the University of California (UC). This claim is backed up by Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China, which provides an authoritative ranking of research universities. The UC’s campus at Berkeley ranks third behind two private universities, Harvard and Stanford. Several of the other ten UC sites, such as Los Angeles and San Diego, are not far behind. Californians are justifiably proud.

It is therefore no small matter that this glory may be about to end. “We are in irreversible decline,” says Sandra Faber, a professor of astrophysics at UC Santa Cruz who has inadvertently become a mouthpiece for a fed-up faculty. >b?University excellence, she says, “took decades to build. It takes a year to destroy it.”

Comment by Muggy
2009-08-08 08:41:02

I am of two minds about this PB, and of course I would like your feedback since you are an educator too.

Mind one: I love education and it’s a great way to spend time. I absolutely love thinking out loud discussing, blah, all the things we do here. *Puts on flame suit* I also think it’s valuable even if it does not “make” anything.

Mind two: education is one of the worst offenders when it comes to inefficiency and waste.

So, somewhere between all the “liberal arts haters,” and “let’s give every staff member a new laptop” is where education needs to end up. This will not be an easy place to get to. I can only say that the organization is one of the leanest and meanest uses of tax dollars around, and for that I am proud. I have also worked for what I consider one of the worst offenders I have ever witnessed, but I can’t go in to details for professional reasons.

Comment by Muggy
2009-08-08 08:59:34

the organization that I work for is one of…

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 09:00:07

One of the points of a ‘university’ is for its grads to be ‘well-rounded’, ie an engineering graduate knows a little Shakespeare, and an English grad knows basic chemistry. That may be what is lost as economic pressures force people to treat college more like a trade school, with liberal arts schools becoming the domain of the idle rich. (or future lawyers)

Comment by DennisN
2009-08-08 09:12:32

the idle rich…or future lawyers….but I repeat myself…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Muggy
2009-08-08 09:46:48

“but I repeat myself…”

Choose wisely! :grin:

 
 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-08-08 09:49:40

An acquaintance of mine raised her oldest children in Germany (husband’s career path), and she said the teachers have kids for years as students, and then progress to another teacher for another extended period of time (4 yrs at least). The reason is, the teacher can follow the academic progress of each student and help determine if the child is college material or trade school bound. They don’t have a stigma on trade schools like we do.
Medical (Image Techs), Paralegals (some programs), and so forth are trade school material too, not just a blue collar path.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2009-08-08 11:12:58

What if the teacher and student don’t get along? Are the stuck with each other for four years?

 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-08-08 15:17:02

Good question, oxide. In an ideal world, the teacher should be able to stay ojective, but you make a good point. I also thought of slow starters, like myself.

I didn’t realize my potential until I went to a JC, and got some confidence. I was abused. 2 yrs later, I found myself at the doors of a university.

 
 
 
Comment by talon
2009-08-08 09:37:08

One of the big problems affecting higher education is the fact that it’s become so administratively top-heavy over the last couple of decades. When I was in grad school at the U of Iowa in the late 1970s, my department had about 450 undergraduate majors and about 150 grad students. Department staff consisted of a director, an assistant director, and two secretaries. Now, with approximately half the number of students, there is a director, an assistant director, two administrative assistants (one for each), two secretaries, an IT person, a media/public relations person and a PR assistant. Granted, IT didn’t exist when I was there, but still, this is just absurd. I have no idea what these people do all day—for years anybody who didn’t want to do any actual work could request a budget line for an assistant on the flimsiest of justification and they got it. If UC, or any other university system, is having budget issues they can start by eliminating half the staff.

Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-08-08 09:48:17

One of the big problems affecting higher education is the fact that it’s become so administratively top-heavy over the last couple of decades.

Absolutely.

You don’t even have to travel all that far back in time to find the leaner administrative staffs. Couple that with the often absurd salaries some upper-level administrators now command ($100K+ in a college town goes a loooong way) and a lot of the fat in the system is revealed. In the meantime, actual teaching costs keep going down, with more adjunct professors (i.e., independent contractors), more TAs, fewer tenured positions, and higher student-to-teacher ratios.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by desertdweller
2009-08-08 21:41:43

Maybe that is why a childhood neighbor, HR for UC isn’t too down about the impending -8% and 21day furlough. Which hasn’t been enacted yet. Maybe the position she has is KACHING.

 
 
Comment by kirisdad
2009-08-08 10:40:35

That’s what decades of low interest guv’t loans and HELOC money will do….create bubble price tuitions thru waste.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Captain Credit Crunch
2009-08-08 11:23:23

As a college administrator, I can say that staff increases have increased for many reasons.

1) Regulatory - Each time the federal / state government passes the Higher Education Act or whatnot, it includes a bajillion mandates to colleges and the Secretary of Ed., who then passes them on to colleges. Staff have to take care of these things, which are non-trivial.

2) Student Affairs - As school has become more popularized, en loco parentis has taken on a new twist. Kids and parents demand that there be activities outside of the classroom. Student affairs staff has ballooned to accommodate. Housing programs, learning centers, an intercultural office for every ethnicity, intramurals, athletics (which has an insane amount of regulation, too), newspaper, television station, greek society, special programs for transfer students. I could go on and on. The number of staff here is astounding.

3) Information Technology (see regulation) - IT allows some staff members to become amazingly productive, but I think the huge investments are wasted on most. Both universities in which I have worked have had IT staffs of 40+. I swear they constantly upgrade things for no reason but to stay busy. I know of one law school that still uses a student information system from the early 1990s; kudos to them.

4) Financials (see regulation, especially for public schools) - Christ, everything has to be triple checked, auditing has to be bulletproof lest you get called out in the SF Chronicle, and you better have “controls” in place which requires more staff (I mean that staff overlap in authority to spend money and review purchases, so that malfeasance chances are small). Every department has this. There is a Sarbanes Oxley equivalent for non-profits called …. shoot, the name escapes me.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 20:55:23

“as a college administrator…”

How many of your school’s professors recently bought Porsche 911 Turbos?

 
Comment by Captain Credit Crunch
2009-08-09 10:09:25

I don’t know. Of course, many have $45,000 cars, which is what I paid in cash after saving 3 years for it. You assume too much.

 
 
Comment by Captain Credit Crunch
2009-08-08 11:27:08

5) Accreditation - Jesus, I forgot the biggest offender of all. WASC and others are now asking the absurd — prove your students are learning. Shouldn’t the onus be on students at this level? At the risk of losing accreditation status, universities now have to invest in assessment offices to work with faculty and staff to have each of them essentially to a program evaluation (all the time) to show that students are learning what the school hopes they learn.

6) Administrators - All of the above has created a “need” for a litany of new vice chancellors, vice presidents, assistant vice la las, etc.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by talon
2009-08-08 14:44:35

Don’t get me STARTED on that one. I taught in a small liberal arts college from 1992-2005, and that assessment nonsense cropped up around 2001. We had to come up with “rubrics” to determine whether students were learning the material, and if they weren’t, then the material had to be adjusted to produce better “outcomes” (meaning results, of course, but BS jargon sounds so much more elevated). The dean was really into this cr@p, because it relieved her of actually having to think (gee, professor Fuddyduddy, your assesment numbers weren’t very good last semester), but most of the faculty hated it. Add to this nonsense the fact that students are now “customers” and entitled to at least a B for showing up, and you have a toxic mix that has significantly dumbed down higher education. The fact that the whole assessment mechanism is ridiculously easy to game seemed to escape all of those who were touting it. If I’m devising the rubric and the means of assessment, I can skew the results any way I want (in much the same way that anybody with a brain can figure out how to pander to students to get stellar evaluations). I finally just got fed up with it, and left. People thought I was insane to give up a tenured position, but it was getting to the point where it just wasn’t worth the frustration.

 
Comment by Muggy
2009-08-08 17:00:33

“Add to this nonsense the fact that students are now customers”

LOL! That’s basically my thesis (using a quality mgt. approach to reduce truancy). I get what you’re saying, especially for the college level, but I think there is a case to be made for helping students with what they need, rather than telling them “how it is” at the high school level.

Did you know Hispanics give POLICE better service ratings than school!?

Speaking of that, COPS just started. Sweeeeet.

 
Comment by desertdweller
2009-08-08 21:50:26

assessment nonsense cropped up around 2001.

We can all thank the previous administration for the “nochildleftbehind” bs.

 
Comment by In Montana
2009-08-09 10:29:42

I thought NCLB was for k-12? The commenters were talking college level.

 
 
Comment by Kim
2009-08-08 13:42:34

“One of the big problems affecting higher education is the fact that it’s become so administratively top-heavy over the last couple of decades.”

Its not just higher education. Our local school district operates out of a building the same size as a school, only there are no students in that building, just “administrators”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 10:07:33

“Mind two: education is one of the worst offenders when it comes to inefficiency and waste.”

It is easy to point to visible examples of wastefulness in education, and very easy to overlook the benefits of living among well-educated people. I personally would be happy to pay for educational waste, if it resulted in a population less prone to stupid conduct like buying houses they cannot afford.

Of course, despite California’s vaunted higher education system, stupid behavior by individuals that somehow missed out on a basic understanding of mortgage and budget arithmetic has put the state deeply under water (financially speaking).

Comment by GrizzlyBear
2009-08-08 18:22:54

“Of course, despite California’s vaunted higher education system, stupid behavior by individuals that somehow missed out on a basic understanding of mortgage and budget arithmetic has put the state deeply under water (financially speaking).”

Like CALPERS, who went all in on real estate.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CA renter
2009-08-09 03:29:56

Like CALPERS, who went all in on real estate.

…and really piled on the RE investments right at the bubble peak.

 
 
 
Comment by james
2009-08-08 10:50:55

I don’t want to come off as a liberal arts hater. Honestly I don’t.

They are compaining about salary levels and I sent a post into the grinder.

Anyhow, there isn’t a market for a lot of the things we research or invest in. Astrology people (not a typo) like one from the article add little of practical value, for now at least.
Same with many areas of study.

Unfortunatly, when we talked about changes in lifestyle, this is one of the areas that is likely to be hit. Its a pure expense that doesn’t represent any kind of efficiency.

I think if the educators involved really care about what they are doing, they have to share the pain with the rest of us and take the hits and keep going.

This is just another side effect of deflation and the bubble. Salaries and values are in massive flux. People resist the changes.

Comment by oxide
2009-08-08 11:17:44

They ARE taking hits. I’ve seen universities slash salaries on tenured faculty by up to 30%. Another school said “no raises” and the faculty there thanked their lucky stars.

And these people were NOT liberal arts profs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 08:51:25

mmmm….seed corn

Maybe the Chinese could buy Berkeley? As an inflation hedge.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 10:08:57

You mean they don’t already own Berkeley? I always suspected that was the reason they call it “The People’s Republic of Berkeley,” but I most likely am confused on this point…

 
 
Comment by scdave
2009-08-08 09:01:35

True story and part of the problem with the California higher education cost…

Friend had a house in a very good school district he wanted to rent because he was leaving the country for 4 years…I watched over it for him…Family of four rented it…Chinese with the dad in a job relocation…It talking to the father he said he could afford to buy but he just wanted to rent…I asked why…He said that he was only staying until the two children graduated from high school and entered college (two years)…He would then return home while the children stayed here and completed college…One went to Berkley and the other to UCLA as “resident” students…

Comment by ET-Chicago
2009-08-08 10:02:52

What’s the problem with that?

That guy is smart enough to take advantage of the system — and his residency ploy is legal. If I moved there from Illinois w/ the same plan, would it be OK or not?

Comment by desertdweller
2009-08-08 22:04:42

SOME folks think it is only good for them, not others.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 08:57:46

Hell. Mr. Filter or Ben exited my post, and all I said, was, “Hey SanFranGal, thanks for the Abbey Road live cam link”

Now, if a broken heart gets a guy in that much trouble, then, it is time to stop posting, I will say.

Also, I never wanted to join a club that would have me as a member anyway. That’s what Groucho taught me… yes, he did…

Comment by Muggy
Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 11:20:43

Watched it, loved it Mugggy. Thanks.

Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 11:21:54

Mugggy=Muggy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Muggy
2009-08-08 17:02:15

I have to watch that about once a month to stay balanced.

 
 
 
Comment by CA renter
2009-08-09 03:36:29

That was great, Muggy! :)

 
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 09:55:32

You are welcome. I’ve been watching it on and off. Saw a few people imitate the Beatles walk, with the cars ready to run them over. :)

Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 09:58:38

Yeah, but ain’t it neat SanFranGirl!!!! It’s so cool.

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 10:11:52

Camvista is one of my favorite places on the web.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 10:18:16

Thank you, and I just added it to my favs!

 
 
Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 10:13:05

I think within maniacal limits it is an appropriate pilgramage. That is all I was trying to say.

Oly? How do u spell Pilgramage??

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 10:57:29

Be a good job for four layabouts, just to hang out down there, dressed and looking like the Beatles did on the album, and charge people to walk across the street with them for photos. I’d pay 20$ for the photo opp, if i’d already traveled that far. (It’d be an easy look for a bum to pull off, too, no offense to the fab four;)

 
Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 11:23:58

always the entrepenuer, ain’t ya, alpha? :)

P.S. Oly, how do you spell, entrypannour???

 
 
 
 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2009-08-08 09:57:18

ATE-UP-
Thanks for the reminder to watch “Duck Soup” this weekend. Good for economic contraction laughs.

Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 11:52:52

You’re welcome awaiting wipeout!

 
 
 
Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 09:06:29

Spooky Test, crazy stuff here, I may say…

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 10:13:20

Professor Bear’s newfangled Wall Street wisdom (said in connection with yesterday’s unemployment rate release):

“You can paint lipstick on a pig, but you can’t make it dance.”

If my longer post on the statistical lie of the BLS unemployment rate calculation makes its way through the blog filter, my pithy saying will really hit home.

 
Comment by Muggy
2009-08-08 10:34:17

The story about the child dying in Death Valley made me curious about that park, so I did an image search. Here are some charcoal kils there that were used to smelt gold. Goldbugs, if it hits the fan, will you really be recreating this?

http://www.cardcow.com/images/the-charcoal-kilns-in-wildrose-canyon-death-valley-national-park-national-parks-21923.jpg

 
Comment by GH
2009-08-08 11:15:38

Doing some research on Cancer a while back after a parent was diagnosed, I found that during it’s life cycle Cancer needs a lot of sugar and carbs to grow and prosper. Substantially limiting food and especially sugar intake can help a lot in the fight against it.

Similarly, I view our current government as a Cancer and it feeds on money rather than sugar. The more money it gets the hungrier and bigger.

A few years back I did some work for an Irvine, CA school teacher who complained they had no money for new books etc. Incredulous I asked how this was possible in one of the wealthiest cities in California. She responded they have a ton of money, but that problem was they employed an administrator per teacher. The same is true for Police, Fire, Prisons, Health and Human Services and it goes on. Our son’s old middle school which has some 1100 students and did while he was in school used to have a principal and a vice principal. Now has a principal, 3 vice principals and a host of other administrative positions. They will be laying off teachers and aids, but will keep the VP positions.

I hear hand wringing about how schools will need to lay off teachers, and State Parks will be closed, Prisoners will be released early, Roads are not repaired, Sewage is dumped into the ocean and yet to date, thank goodness not a SINGLE administrative position to my knowledge has been lost.

Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 11:35:02

GH: Outstanding post, and my heart is with you regarding your parent being diagnosed with cancer. I hope for your family the best.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 12:57:44

“Substantially limiting food and especially sugar intake can help a lot in the fight against it.”

Ssshhh! The agribusiness-industrial-complex spies are listening…

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 13:49:34

GH,

Sorry to hear about your parent. My thoughts are with you and your family. My mom’s stomach cancer was diagnosed last year.

Comment by GH
2009-08-08 17:06:37

Thanks, likewise sorry to hear of your moms cancer. It is a tough thing to go through for sure.

Comment by desertdweller
2009-08-08 22:27:06

we have more cancers and disease than ever before, long since the 70s and agri biz ruining the land, exhausting the minerals in our soils, pesticides etc. Citizens didn’t have this much disease. The foods we are eating are without the necessary mineral content of good soils. For example when was the last time you smelled a tomato in the grocery store? They dont’ smell. That is because they no longer have the mineral content to grow. Just the engineered fertilizers/water.
The only thing that smells good in grocery stores is cantaloupes that are ripening. Nothing else. Watermelons dont even taste like they used to.
This is all a major part of why cancers are prevalent and growing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by desertdweller
2009-08-08 22:16:56

sfogal, emaillllme @ellisisland123@ yahoodot co m.

 
 
 
Comment by james
2009-08-08 11:28:31

Just a note here. I keep seeing this repeated over and over and over.

People seem to do this statistical trending today to predict things. So, I’m in production trying to produce high reliability hardware. We are looking for failure rates (think events) that occur fairly infrequently. So, you might have a failure in 1/2000 parts.

Then some guy comes along, 500 parts into production, and says that the statistical trend shows that since we have had no defects in the first n parts that the incidence of the failure rate is one in x million. So, then its a big fight to reduce the amount of screening that we do. For me the stats are pretty simple, I am saying the probability of producing 2000 parts with zero failures is 50%. Why is that being extrapolated to x in a million chance?

This seems to be occuring over and over in many industries. I said that we could use the criterion the person is asking about, however we’d need to tighten the specification on the remaining testing. Then corelation between the spread of performance and potential defects.

Now in the financial services, FDIC/GSE and such, their analysis seems quite similar. Basically they saw a trend of decreasing faliures and assumed a trend and probability that this means failure rate was now much lower. So, then reserve rates were dropped and insurance premiums were cut.

Another strange and common thing going on. There was a trade journal, not a very good one, that had the editor extrapolating that noise figure of devices would go negative. Now, this is physically impossible. Just wondering how this guy got to be in charge of journal? Similar, what did our financial experts think was going to happen with all the rates going to zero?

Did they expect negative rates to occur? At this point, banks are getting money from the Fed free. Basically making a fortune on fees alone. What are they extrapolating this to in the future? In fact, banks are esentially getting negative rates. They are charging the treasury for processing bonds while taking in the cash the treasury generates.

Sorry about the general lack of focus here… thinking and sorting through things in my mind. Trying to understand where we are at.

Basically want to find the guy who wrote the “black swan” book and slap him with a trout. So many systems modeled incorrectly and finite reources are used up, or growth slows or a marginally stable system is created… then something goes wrong that was apparent from the begining if the model had been complete/correct or adequate… out comes the black swan excuse.

An actual black swan would be a biological anomally, like an oil eating bacteria gets loose and destroys half the worlds oil fields. Or a metor hits New Jersey and levels the place.

Its a strange world. Also feel corruption of scientific and cultural thought continues in the guise of political correctness.

Comment by pismoclam
2009-08-08 15:43:24

How can we help ‘the meteor hitting New Jersey’? Perhaps will also wipe out GS ?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 13:06:02

How long until Mr Market sees through the statistical lie of the unemployment report release?

Financial Times
US jobs report spurs stocks
By Michael Mackenzie and Simone Baribeau in New York
Published: August 7 2009 13:52 | Last updated: August 7 2009 21:43

Stock markets on both sides of the Atlantic hit their highest levels in months on Friday after better-than-expected economic data in the US and Germany buttressed hopes for an economic recovery.

The US non-farms payroll report showed the economy lost 247,000 jobs in July, far below a median estimate of 320,000 jobs from economists surveyed by Reuters, while the unemployment rate slipped from 9.5 per cent in June to 9.4 per cent.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 13:10:02

Real Time Economics
Economic insight and analysis from The Wall Street Journal.

* August 3, 2009, 3:51 AM ET

Dr. Doom Sees Double-Dip Recession Risk, in Remarks Down Under

By WSJ Staff
By Elisabeth Behrmann

Advanced economies are showing signs of bottoming in response to massive financial and fiscal government stimulus but the global economy will stay in a recession until the end of the year, U.S. economist Nouriel Roubini said Monday in Kalgoorlie, Australia.

His comments came a day after Alan Greenspan said in an ABC interview that he is “pretty sure we’ve already seen the bottom” and that “Collapse now, I think, is off the table.”

In Roubini’s remarks, he predicted the global economy would contract by 2% in 2009, staying in a recession until the end of the year, but would grow by 2%-3% next year, he said.

That will offer a boon to commodity prices, which should trend higher from current levels but still run the risk of a correction should the global recovery surprise on the downside.

“In addition to the green shoots, we see worrying signs. There’s a risk of relapse, of a double-dip recession in the second half of next year,” Roubini said, tipping U.S. house prices to contract another 13% next year, on top of a drop in prices of 27% since their highs in 2006.

Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 13:11:17

So if you like to gamble in stocks and believe in Dr Doom’s crystal ball, you should stock up now and sell by when? September 2010 or so?

 
Comment by Kim
2009-08-08 13:51:51

Interesting. I caught “Fast Money” the other night and they were also floating the story that THIS recession will be over soon, but we’ll see ANOTHER (different) recession right afterwards.

I’ll guess that nearly everyone but politicians and economists will neither feel nor understand the distinction.

 
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 13:50:44

Any of you southern Californian bloggers hear from Combo?

Comment by CA renter
2009-08-09 03:43:33

If you’re wondering if he showed up at our gathering, no, he did not (at least not that we saw).

Is he missing?

BTW, where is Olygal?

 
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 15:23:15

“First time I heard about “cash for clunkers,” I thought it was about raising the per diem for the Senate.”

- Will Durst, SFGate

Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 15:37:42

I’m a clunker, and heck, I don’t even want no cash. Nope…

Just a lady to hold my hand, would be a nice trade. I can smile, can I not? :)

Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 16:20:31

Can you say… a “Little Over”? :) I knew you could…:)

Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 16:37:14

Plus, I am half drunk. Good night everybody, and I thank you for the audition.! (Oly? How, do spell audition?). :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2009-08-08 16:44:09

Take care Ate-Up

 
Comment by ATE-UP
2009-08-08 16:48:14

Awake still smile for you, always…

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 20:12:30

“How, do spell audition?”

I can handle that one: audition

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2009-08-08 21:00:45

unless he means ‘addition’

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Rancher
2009-08-08 17:33:29

What a great group of posts. Been gone since before
dawn and just got back. Mixed a tall cool one and
started on the blog and haven’t stopped laughing yet.

Glad to see everyone is having a fine weekend.

OLY Girl! Where are YOU??

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2009-08-08 20:11:27

On my “unread book” shelf, in plain view even as I type:

Lunch with the FT: Jared Diamond
By David Pilling
Published: August 7 2009 15:22 | Last updated: August 7 2009 15:22

Jared Diamond is the guru of collapse. Collapse is the title of one of the books that have made him a world-famous academic. It is a theme that captures the Zeitgeist: markets have collapsed, banks have collapsed and confidence, even in the capitalist system itself, has collapsed.

Diamond’s celebrated book – which added to the reputation he earned through Guns, Germs andSteel, a Pulitzer prize-winner about why some societies triumph over others – sought to discover what makes civilisations, many at their apparent zenith, crumble overnight. The Maya of Central America, the stone-carving civilisation of Easter Island, and the Soviet Union – all suddenly shattered.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post