January 10, 2010

Bits Bucket For January 10, 2010

Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here.

Click here to find Jonathan Miller’s Housing Helix podcast about the HBB.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

301 Comments »

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 08:27:14

http://newhavenregister.com/articles/2010/01/10/news/a1jesse.txt

Jes’ Me Jackson and ACORN have a new shakedown target: The Banksters. This should be entertaining.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-01-10 09:27:16

Whos said something like “Why do I rob banks? Because that’s where the money is!”

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 09:44:45

Wall Street bankster philosophy: “Why do I rob Main Street? Because that’s where the wealth is.”

Comment by Bungalowball
2010-01-10 10:00:02

Alternatively:
Wall Street bankster philosophy: “Why do I rob Main Street? Because there’s still some money left there.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:04:43

Or perhaps:

“Why did I used to rob Main Street? Because that’s where the money used to be.”

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-01-10 10:59:21

I guess Jesse Jackson sounding like an hbber is causing some cognitive dissonance, eh?

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-01-10 11:03:06

oops- meant to be a reply to Sammy’s post…

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 14:47:42

Jessie Jackson has made a lucrative career out of extorting companies and corporations. It’s a mark of success of sorts when Jackson starts jonesing around (no offense Ben) with his rent-a-mobs chanting “No Justice, No Peace” (translation: show us the money or we riot). This guy has nothing in common with any HBBer I can think of. Right now the banks are flush with taxpayer “donated” funds, so ol’ Jessie was bound to make them his next target.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-01-10 17:32:28

By Jim Shelton, Register Staff

“The Rev. Jesse Jackson was in town Saturday, with a message for the “banksters” controlling the American financial system: He’s coming for you, and he’s bringing a bunch of people with him.

“I see whole towns sinking because of bankster power,” Jackson told a crowd of about 100 people at First Calvary Baptist Church on Dixwell Avenue. “We’re all worried about the street gangster. What about the bankster?”

snip

In his speech, Jackson railed against the idea that Congress bailed out the banks without linking the bailout to reinvestment. He noted that only a fraction of the mortgages eligible for restructuring have been changed.

“When the Congress was either bought up by the banks or raised money from the banks, the Congress no longer was the referee (of the financial sector),” Jackson said. “The banks bought up the referees.”

Yeah, that kind of talk would never fly around here.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by stpn2me
2010-01-10 08:30:58

I just saw The gov of california on Meet the Press say, “Everyone wants to come to California”…

ROTFLMAO…LOL…LOL..

Comment by DennisN
2010-01-10 08:35:50

Nobody goes there anymore…it’s too crowded. ;)

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 08:59:01

Actually, the beach goers have enjoyed plenty of open space since the onset of the financial crisis, with accompanying shrinkage of the tourism industry.

Comment by scdave
2010-01-10 09:16:11

I agree Bear…I have spent many solitary days on the beach in Pismo & Avila this past year…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-01-10 11:30:04

Let the critics stay away from California. We will have it for ourselves.

Taxes? Convert to Roth IRAs, buy treasuries and municipal bonds.

Smog? Live along the beach.

Earthquakes? BFD.

Only Hawaii has the better climate. But California has great universities, still has a good deal of high tech jobs, and has all the variety of climates within a six hour drive from tropical beach, desert, to alpine. And yes you can surf and snow ski on the same day.

 
Comment by scdave
2010-01-10 12:03:12

+ 1 + 1 for Bill-in-LA

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2010-01-10 12:15:10

“Only Hawaii has the better climate. But California has great universities, still has a good deal of high tech jobs, and has all the variety of climates within a six hour drive from tropical beach, desert, to alpine. And yes you can surf and snow ski on the same day.”

For me to get to Yosemite is a 4 hour drive. So yes, I can be at the beach and the snow on the same day.

 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2010-01-10 16:12:49

“And yes you can surf and snow ski on the same day.”

Sure, if you want to go night skiing. Realistically, there is little chance of actually enjoying both activities on the same day given the horrendous commute involved.

 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2010-01-10 16:56:59

Who freekin cares if you can drive 4 hours to surf and ski on the same day? I’d rather live in a solvent state with jobs.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-01-10 19:36:55

“Who freekin cares if you can drive 4 hours to surf and ski on the same day? I’d rather live in a solvent state with jobs.”

Apparantly not you. Enjoy your homogeneous state. B-O-R-I-N-G!

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2010-01-10 10:26:06

“Actually, the beach goers have enjoyed plenty of open space since the onset of the financial crisis, with accompanying shrinkage of the tourism industry.”

Same for Pinellas County Florida parks. Some days I think I am the only guy that lives here — not a bad thing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 08:36:05

The Governator certainly wants all of our tax dollars to come to California.

 
Comment by mikey
2010-01-10 09:29:08

He should have said,

“Everybody wants to come to California…Bring Money with you”

Comment by In Colorado
2010-01-10 09:35:04

The reminds me of a family guy episoide where Brian washes Michael Eisner’s car (the the CEO of Disney). Eisner puts a pair of Mickey ears on Brian and says “See you at Disneyland, bring money.”

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-01-10 11:32:15

People keep coming despite the high taxes. There is a “can do” spirit still in California. People are enspired by the beauty of the state and the freedom from being trapped in a poor climate. If a Californian does not like the climate, he moves to another part of the state.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-01-10 13:23:28

From what I have read its been mostly poor, uneducated illegals who have been coming to California while the educated have been steadily leaving.

As a former Californian I would never dream of returning to live in that 3rd world cesspool.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-01-10 14:09:09

I’ve lived in other states. Arizona is becoming too social conservative for me. I’ve noticed the change in its laws. Its education system is one of the worst in the 50 states. New Jersey has clean air communities, but it’s darned cold. Maryland is pretty nice, but still cold.

You can discover ways to reduce your taxes and make it worthwhile to be in California. I’m sure Colorado is a gorgeous state, but as long as I find ways to profit by living in California, I will continue to do so.

At the end of the year in California, after taxes and expenses, if you have more savings than the previous year, you made a profit. What’s the matter with that?

 
Comment by cashedin05
2010-01-10 15:43:06

“Arizona is becoming too social conservative for me.”

Arizona is getting overrun by Progressives who think that they can do a better job of creating a socialist utopia than they did in the state they left behind. Never mind their first attempt was an abject failure. The will create the “Perfect Society”.

This has produced a smack down consisting of higher taxes, increased corruption, budget deficits, smoking bans, bans just for the sake of bans, infinite education spending with mediocre results, red light cameras, photo radar, and so many new laws every year that one is afraid to leave the house for fear of committing some kind of newly defined felony.

If anything, freedom is suffering in Arizona.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-01-10 17:35:41

Thanks! I would not call them “progressives,” but “populists.” If you find a site of the “shortest political quiz” you will see what I mean: A combination of social conservatism and nanny state regulations.

Yes, you have to double take practically every thing you do at least in Maricopa Cty for fear of being arrested for a felony just by stepping outside your residence.

 
Comment by exeter
2010-01-10 19:43:39

If the GOP would offload the burden called “social conservatives” they might eventually shake their better know moniker of Party of Hypocrites.

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-01-10 22:38:06

Nope Exeter. The GOP must also walk the walk of small government. After all, the Republican-controlled Congress voted for the socialist Prescription Medicine Benefit. That’s not the GOP my dad knew.

 
 
Comment by rms
2010-01-10 16:06:28

“People are enspired [sic] by the beauty of the state and the freedom from being trapped in a poor climate.”

The climate is everything, IMHO. I’ve lived in cold country for twelve years now, and I’m sick and tired of people telling me they like winter. Most of them don’t do anything outdoors. It reminds me of people who like football, which really means soda pop and frankfurters while perched on a couch.

Too bad California can’t be divided into four or five smaller states.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-10 09:37:13

Maybe he meant folks from North Dakota… ;-)

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 14:48:56

“Everyone wants to come to California”…

Everybody south of the Rio Grande, that is.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-01-10 16:28:18

Bingo. I got tired of feeling I lived in Mexico, so I left.

 
 
 
Comment by Martin
2010-01-10 08:32:54

Hey Ben
I’m waiting for the next meet in DC area. I’ll take you around the Eastern Panhandle of WV to show a live picture of Boom and bust.

Somehow due to stimulus and low rates, the prices are up again by 5-7%.
But they will fall again later this year when reality strikes realty.

Martin

Comment by NYchk
2010-01-10 08:41:39

When’s the next meet-up?

Comment by Ben Jones
2010-01-10 08:51:05

We’ve been planning on DC in June, and I would like to see some of the other areas as well. I’ve never been to Boston or NYC, so maybe we can make it a tour.

Comment by NYchk
2010-01-10 09:11:47

Sounds great. Which week of June?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by scdave
2010-01-10 09:17:45

The sooner I find out the date the better chance I will have to attend…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2010-01-10 19:52:46

June 24th -28th is when I’ll be there so around that weekend?

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-10 09:34:43

When do most schools end their school year on the East Coast? I like to take Mr. Cole to the museums but not when vacations start…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2010-01-10 10:15:04

Good point Hwy…I will likely be a zoo once school is out…

 
Comment by laurel, md
2010-01-10 11:09:15

Middle of June. Although if we get another heavy snow with lost school days closure will be extended a week.

 
Comment by oxide
2010-01-10 11:15:01

It doesn’t really matter when school gets out. Many many groups of rugrats take the “Field Trip to Our Nation’s Capitol” while school is still in session.

I’d wait until after Memorial Day (most schools are out early June, I think). After that you only have clueless parents hauling strollers up and down the Metro.

 
Comment by polly
2010-01-10 11:28:40

If you come in June, bring a hat - lightweight with a wide brim.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-01-10 11:52:27

We’re not done w/school until after the 3rd week in June. I’d be really interested in attending the Boston meet up so will be looking forward to the dates being published.

 
Comment by scdave
2010-01-10 12:05:24

Is it that hot in June ??

 
Comment by polly
2010-01-10 12:52:05

“Is it that hot in June ??”

Can be, though not always. By mid to late June you could face 95+ with very high humidity.

 
Comment by exeter
2010-01-10 16:00:08

Yeah if we can dry erase in a rough schedule I’d love to be a part of a one day tour of Sussex County, DE. I’d schedule a week off and bring the family down there.

Do I have any interest in touring anyone upstate or VT? Notta chance. I’d be too pissed off.

 
Comment by Ben Jones
2010-01-10 16:04:50

OK, I’ll start trying to figure out a plan. Thanks.

 
Comment by exeter
2010-01-10 18:19:53

BTW, I dunno about anyone else but the July 4th week is better.

 
Comment by packman
2010-01-10 20:44:38

FYI one area that might be good to see is Manassas. That was probably the biggest bubble area around DC, and could be combined with a historic side-trip to the national battlefield.

Manassas Park I believe was the next municipality to go bankrupt after Vallejo, CA.

I should be around and be up for any meetup. I live in nearby Loudoun County. There’s not too much interesting out this way, other than there is quite a bit of empty new office space. There’s still some building going on around here actually, though not as vacant as many other areas (FL, CA etc.) because unemployment here is still relatively low - about 5%. Manassas area - extreme exurbs of DC - was hit about the hardest.

 
 
Comment by mikey
2010-01-10 09:45:43

Cool,

We could march around the White House or DC NAR Office in our HBB T-Shirts and be arrested as terrorists after “Happy Hour” in Georgetown.

:)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by WHYoung
2010-01-10 10:08:20

If going from DC to to NYC or Boston, Amtrak is a viable option. Travel time door-to-door DC/NYC is comparable and prices competitive, plus it will let you get an alternate perspective.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by oxide
2010-01-10 11:17:33

alternate perspective… like a bird’s eye view of the bombed-out slums of Baltimorgue.

 
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2010-01-10 08:46:32

Eastern Panhandle of WV is the mother of all leapfrog* exurbs. YOu knew it wasn’t going to end well.

—–
* If you build on the edge of town, soon the town engulfs you anyway. So some builders built way way out in the sticks, leapfrogging far over the edge of town. That’s why DC is known for long commutes.

Comment by GrizzlyBear
2010-01-10 11:02:59

Before the bubble, if a developer built a subdivision way out in the boonies, it was almost certain financial suicide. People would look around and say “WTF is that?” And that’s assuming it could have been approved by the local planning commissions, a real stretch for poorly conceived ideas. During the mania, however, builders could throw up the cheapest, most hideous crap in the worst locations- anywhere really- and it would sell. The community development types never even batted an eye, and rubber stamped everything. Now, the chickens are coming home to roost.

Comment by oxide
2010-01-10 11:24:59

The community development types were desperate for tax money. There’s not much tax income to be had from the proverbial stove-on-the-porch, car-up-on-blocks rural poor. But an educated family with government and/or government contractor job and the salary to match… of course they rubber-stamped everything.

It’s as combo says: cash is king — or, at least, breaking even is king. Everyone is trying to distinguish the real money produced by past labor from the *poof* money produced by the promise of future labor.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by bink
2010-01-10 14:15:49

There’s always the option of an unofficial meetup. All it takes is for someone to pick a date and a location and hope for the best. I’ll be out of town for some weeks, so I’m not offering my services just yet.

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-01-11 10:13:08

The Maryland - DC - NoVa area will be the last to fall, if ever. This is truly the Land of the Eternal Bubble. When tear-downs sell for more than a real house should, you know the Bubble is unstoppable.

 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 08:34:50

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/opinion/10rich.html

A rare NYT editorial on the incredible damage Banksters have wreaked on the US economy, and the need to rein them in.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-10 09:31:28

“Paul Volcker… there is not “one shred of neutral evidence” that any financial innovation of the past 20 years has led to economic growth.”

Is he referring to individuals or CORPORATIONS? ;-)

Comment by combotechie
2010-01-10 09:52:46

One shred of evidence I saw that inspired “growth” was the evolution of financial machinery that allowed risks to be passed on to someone else. These many thousands of junk McMansions wouldn’t have sprung up out of nowhere if the risks of making stupid loans were kept with the loan originators.

 
Comment by mikey
2010-01-10 10:40:43

Good article,

I am now convinced nothing short of roving lynch mobs with ropes can save America from Wall Street and Washington.

“Hang ‘Em High”

:)

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 14:50:45

A lot of individuals lined their pockets very nicely through the financial “innovations” of the past two decades.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:30:02

Has anyone else seen Avatar yet? While watching the show, I found myself envisioning a futuristic Megabank, Inc funding the incursion of a ginormous forest-clearing machine into Olygal’s primeval surroundings.

Comment by mikey
2010-01-10 10:48:39

‘Olygal — come back, Olygal !”

(little mikey crys and bites his upper lip.)

:(

 
 
Comment by SDGreg
2010-01-10 11:50:29

“Though bad history shows every sign of repeating itself on Wall Street, it will take a near-miracle for Angelides to repeat Pecora’s triumph. Our zoo of financial skullduggery is far more complex, with many more moving pieces, than that of the 1920s. The new inquiry does have subpoena power, but its entire budget, a mere $8 million, doesn’t even match the lobbying expenditures for just three banks (Citi, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America) in the first nine months of 2009. The firms under scrutiny can pay for as many lawyers as they need to stall between now and Dec. 15, deadline day for the commission’s report.”

The Dec 15 deadline is conveniently after the November elections and being 10 days before Christmas, less likely to be noticed by people getting ready for the holidays. That’s a good time to release something you want to bury.

 
 
Comment by Lip
2010-01-10 08:37:05

The Other Plot to Wreck America by Frank Rich

“THERE may not be a person in America without a strong opinion about what coulda, shoulda been done to prevent the underwear bomber from boarding that Christmas flight to Detroit. In the years since 9/11, we’ve all become counterterrorists. But in the 16 months since that other calamity in downtown New York — the crash precipitated by the 9/15 failure of Lehman Brothers — most of us are still ignorant about what Warren Buffett called the “financial weapons of mass destruction” that wrecked our economy. Fluent as we are in Al Qaeda and body scanners, when it comes to synthetic C.D.O.’s and credit-default swaps, not so much.”

“Trade bad Latin American debt for bad mortgage debt, and you have a partial portrait of Citigroup at the height of the housing bubble. The reckless Citi executives of our day may not have given themselves interest-free loans, but they often walked away with the short-term, illusionary profits while their employees were left with shredded jobs and 401(k)’s. Among those Citi executives was Robert Rubin, who, as the Clinton Treasury secretary, helped repeal the last vestiges of Glass-Steagall after years of Wall Street assault.”

Good article about CITI and the Financial Crisis Inquiry Committee.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/opinion/10rich.html?ref=opinion

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-10 09:27:23

“…If Citi, among the most egregious of Wall Street reprobates, feels it can get away with business as usual, it’s because it fears no retribution.”

“Spare the rod… spoil the MegaBank” or something like that. ;-)

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 09:48:03

My revisionist ursine bite of Wall Street folk wisdom once again comes to mind:

Greed Fear is good.”

Comment by eudemon
2010-01-10 14:50:53

“Fear is Good”

Yes. For Obama.

‘Tis nothing better than to extend the lawlessness and reward of those who should rot in jail (banksters with money) if your aim is to be a despot (Obama).

I don’t fear for my future. I fear the stupidity of the everyday American.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 09:53:57

To put it simply, Megabank, Inc’s mortgage securitization scheme inflicted far more damage on the American economy than the ragtag band of 9/11 terrorists could have ever dreamed of inflicting.

Comment by SDGreg
2010-01-10 11:54:12

And we’ve also inflicted far more damage to ourselves through excessive “security” measures.

 
Comment by BlueStar
2010-01-10 14:37:07

I can see the fingerprints of disaster capitalism all over this. The banksters were masquerading as Firemen while they were actually Financial Arsonist.

 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 08:39:42

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/6958528/Record-bonus-pot-at-JP-Morgan.html

JP Morgan to pay out record bonuses. So much for Obama’s staged photo op “scolding” of his string-pullers at the White House.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 09:51:18

His presidency seems to be shaping up as more about sound bites and photo ops than action.

Comment by scdave
2010-01-10 10:31:44

He inherited a “stink bomb”…Makes me wonder how the “rich man” McCain would have reacted if he was elected..

Looking at the big picture, IMO, 99% of Obama’s presidency has already been a success…The nation, as a whole, was able to overcome the racists southern white man and elect a African American President of the USA…

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:40:38

True. I keep neglecting the fact that he inherited the mess W made.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mikey
2010-01-10 10:54:21

Yeah…some people in America will do almost anything to see that the black guy gets the worse job in America.

 
Comment by Diogenes (Tampa, Florida)
2010-01-10 12:17:22

Yes, that’s true.
I spend all my time, when i’m not working (that was a minimum of 40 hours plus commute and lunch break, so about 55 hours or 33% of the week), sleeping (another 30%), shopping, repairing my house or boat, blogging, exercising, out-drinking with some buddies, reading books, studying music, fixing the car, preparing food and eating various meals, writing out bills for daily expenses, calling my service providers, washing and drying my clothes, shaving, preening, comparing what’s new and what’s on sale, taking a stroll down the beach, calling my mom, cataloging my books and records, washing the car, checking the mail, writing my CONgressman, keeping up with required licensing for everything that moves or makes money, along with required “continuing education” courses, engaging in social “commitments”, and various other time-consuming activities , (and i don’t even have any kids to chase after)………….i devote ALL my time to “beatin’ down the black man”. I don’t know how i find time for anything else.
You know it’s a “FULL TIME” job with all us white racists.
How do we manage?

 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-01-10 11:37:36

I’m quite happy McSame was not voted in. Between McSame and Obama, the one that would be least destructive to the remaining freedoms was/is Obama. McSame would have killed more civil liberties and would have done just the same bailouts. Don’t forget the Democratic Congress would still have been elected whether or not McSame won.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Diogenes (Tampa, Florida)
2010-01-10 12:25:15

Let’s see………..Obama has about 35 unaccountable Czars in various agencies, took over GM, robbed the taxpayers for the banks and AIG, is working to rob us with “universal healthcare” behind closed doors, has increased ALL of Bush’s incursions on civil liberties that you think we are going to lose, and yet he is not going to intrude on our liberties?
get real.
He is like an ACLU on steriods. ACLU invades peoples private lives and seeks to extort money and get people jailed to provide “other” people with “rights”. ACLU should be removed under RICO statutes, because they are basically a racketeering organization, masquerading as a legal “liberty” defender.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 14:55:45

McSame and Palin would have been an even more ghastly choice than Obama and Biden. The beginning of political wisdom is to realize that both major political parties are hopelessly corrupt and beholden to the “monied interests” Thomas Jefferson warned would subvert the Republic.

 
Comment by BlueStar
2010-01-10 15:09:47

You have chosen a screen name from Greek history so maybe you are familiar with Plato and his monumental work “The Republic”. As I understand Plato would have voted for Obama as he supported the Philosopher King form of government. I supported Ron Paul but ended up voting for Obama. Obama might fail and if he does it wasn’t because he came into power with the intent to destroy America. It was in “empire decline” back in 2000 when the Supreme Court pick our next president.

 
Comment by eudemon
2010-01-10 15:13:34

Diogenes -

If you are a Baby Boomer or Greatest Generation , everything you mentioned constitutes “civil rights”. It’s a 1960s/1970s mindset that lots of old people have yet to divest themselves from.

This is understandable. They’ve assuaged their greed for decades by adhering to principles that today are increasingly yielding diminishing returns. Not for them, of course, but for everyone under age 50.

Further, many have made LOTS of money off of “civil rights”. In fact, entire industries (law especially) and government agencies survive on it. Such industries produce nothing as we all know.

If “civil rights” weren’t a source of considerable fiscal profit for the older half of the population, we wouldn’t be listening to the same old drums 40+ years later.

The Baby Boomers and Greatest Generation populations are nothing if not driven by avarice. “Civil Rights” is one of the many institutions that feed that insatiable quest.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-01-10 18:52:52

You have a rather unique definition of ‘civil rights’.

 
Comment by eudemon
2010-01-10 20:09:26

Yeah, I guess I do. Maybe it’s evolving, instead.

This is 2010, not 1967. In my mind’s eye, “civil rights” nowadays is more a function of protecting individuals against intellectual bias rather than racial bias.

I think extreme efforts made by highly partisan people to silence those who disagree has become disgraceful.

One of the basic tenets of the USA is freedom of expression, which I believe is increasingly under attack from both political sides.

It certainly shows itself on this board. Not by Ben, but by some of the regulars.

 
Comment by Yankee Bear
2010-01-10 21:09:42

When do we stop talking about Obama “inheriting” all these problems? Last I checked he’s been in office a year–I think at some point he needs to take some responsibility.

I don’t remember any rumblings of any significance around Bush inheriting an Al Qaida problem, even though he clear did. And that was only 9 months in….

 
 
Comment by Eddie
2010-01-10 15:24:07

So his only qualification for office was his skin color. Fabulous.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 16:01:59

I assume you are talking about W, right?

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-11 00:12:34

Hey Haskell, Ms.Cleaver is looking for you, she doesn’t look happy. ;-)

 
 
 
Comment by polly
2010-01-10 10:58:05

Getting anything more than sound bite to punish the bankers is going to require legislation. You can’t shame people who have none. Congress has been bamboozled by the bankers for so long they don’t even know it is happening. Getting legislation passed is unlikely. Getting good legislation passed is nearly impossible. I’d say flat out impossible, but I respect the field of mathematics too much to make absolute statements like that.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 11:31:28

“Getting anything more than sound bite to punish the bankers is going to require legislation.”

Or worse…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by oxide
2010-01-10 11:47:45

What about existing legislation? The Sherman Anti-Trust act comes to mind.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SDGreg
2010-01-10 11:59:31

“What about existing legislation? The Sherman Anti-Trust act comes to mind.”

Except we’ve spent the past 30 years packing the courts with mostly corporatist judges.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2010-01-10 12:37:05

Wait until the Supremes rule about corporations being entitled to the same rights as a person. The ole saying you aint seen nothing yet comes to mind.

 
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2010-01-10 14:35:52

Wait until the Supremes rule about corporations being entitled to the same rights as a person.

They already have …

en dot wikipedia dot org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v._Southern_Pacific_Railroad

In fact, corporations have greater rights than a natural person, because they can secretly lobby for gov’t goodies, and they can default on loans without being called “immoral”.

 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2010-01-10 22:27:29

I don’t know how these bankers, politicians, and judges can sleep at night knowing what they are doing to their fellow man, their families, their grandchildren. I suppose Polly is right in that they have no conscience, but I still find it remarkable that they are able to bring forth such a hellish wrath with smile on their face and a spring in their step. They are the epitome of evil.

 
 
 
Comment by Eddie
2010-01-10 15:46:32

Oh he’s taking action too. Why I read he is going to spend ye $3B more to create “green” jobs. What’s 3 billion after hes spent a few trillion already? Chump change. Maybe those new jobs will finally put an end to global warming and instead of -50 wind chills in N. Dakota they’ll be back to -55 where they belong damn it.

 
 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-01-10 10:00:31

Finally you got some authors that are connecting the dots . Since the Government was forced into being the lending machine lately(at low rates
with incentives and low down payments ),I ask you why were banks needed anyway ? We saw what Lenders did ,they took the bail-outs and than they raised the credit card rates on stuck borrowers and they gave themselves a bunch of bonuses . They also got to delay the declaring of their loss by accounting rule changes .

Sure ,low down loans and incentives at the taxpayers risk and cost might of helped Main Street with residential lending on still overpriced houses ,but we the Taxpayers are taking that risk and loss ,not the LENDERS or
Investment firms . All the bail outs only served to increase LENDERS or CDO holders reserves or provide a dumping ground for the transfer of high default risk loans ,or 100% pay-outs on junk that had a value of 30%. How much more do they want for F&F ,
something like 400 billion ?
If the Decision Makers had started out this heist by saying we want 7 trillion to keep the Lenders and Investment firms from failing ,or being sued ,or parties going to jail ,the public would of said “Let them fail ,lets create New Banks “.I’m sorry but the greatest Ponzi scheme in history was not addressed by excepting the cop out of .”We didn’t see it coming .” This is not a excuse for breach of duty to underwrite loans or breach of duty to properly rate CDO securities . Ponzi schemes are Ponzi schemes and unregulated leverage up to 40′x’s, along with credit default swaps with no backing ,are simply Casino games ,not a proper outlet for the deposits of the Nation or other Nations that should of been protected from thieves .

What ever happened to the concept of CDO’s were not risky because the risk was spread out ? That failed because the Market Makers in fact didn’t spread out the risk and in their greed they put to many of their eggs in those highly leveraged greedy packages that were doomed when real estate didn’t continue to go up .

But who gave the greedy lying risk takers the right to throw a
unregulated Ponzi Scheme on the masses ? Our wonderful Politicians gave the financial world what they wanted and they ruined what was a somewhat stable secondary market for many years .

Does anybody think that Wall Street ,or Corporations ,or Insurance Companies have the best interest of America at heart ?If entities
can bring a Country down ,shouldn’t they be watched at gun -point ?
No ,in fact they have their guns pointed at our Politicians who are held hostage by their pay offs .

A lot of money was wasted playing the game of the Culprits ,which didn’t spare Main Street any pain ,and in fact they have created the moral hazard of everyone wanting a bail-out and free stuff . But than you add to their malice how they have destroyed the competition in America by their monopolies and absurd takeover by slave wage
labor and outsourced manufacturing and you have a force that doesn’t ‘have any allegiance to its home base that it’s destroying . Just keep the party going is their motto and block any real reform that might level out the playing field again . Just picture them snickering .

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:33:18

“…a force that doesn’t ‘have any allegiance to its home base that it’s destroying…”

What’s good for Megabank, Inc is bad for America.

 
Comment by diemos
2010-01-10 10:45:50

“I ask you why were banks needed anyway ? ”

$10T of outstanding loans at 5% is a $500B a year revenue stream. Since the government backstops all the financial systems losses anyway I don’t know why we just don’t nationalize the whole kit and kaboodle and seize that revenue stream for the gov. 20% down and no more than 3 times income loans for all. You don’t need financial geniuses to make that work. In fact, you want to keep them as far away from that as possible.

 
 
 
Comment by jeff saturday
2010-01-10 08:44:57

China vows to keep “hot money” out of property marketJanuary 10, 2010 2:01 AM ET

All Thomson Reuters news BEIJING (Reuters) - China vowed on Sunday not to let foreign speculative investment affect the property market, the latest expression of official concern that real-estate prices are racing ahead too fast.

The directive from the State Council, China’s cabinet, will serve as a guideline for local authorities and ministries, including the People’s Bank of China and the China Banking Regulatory Commission, to work out detailed policies.

“Relevant departments must enhance monitoring of loans and cross-border investment to prevent illegal inflows of capital into the property market and to avoid the impact of overseas hot money on China’s real-estate market,” the cabinet said.

It said the central bank and banking regulator should step up oversight and “window guidance” of mortgage lending.

About one-sixth of China’s nearly 10 trillion yuan ($1.5 trillion) in new loans last year flowed into the property sector.

Concerned that a property bubble could stir social and economic instability, Beijing has vowed to combat overly fast price increases, although its moves to date, such as restricting sales tax exemptions, have been relatively mild.

The cabinet urged local authorities, especially in cities where housing prices are rising sharply, to increase the supply of affordable housing.

It reiterated that it would curb house buying for “investment and speculation purposes” and keep the minimum down payment for purchases of second homes at 40 percent.

China’s central bank said this week that it would pay particularly close attention to the property market in 2010 while managing inflationary expectations.

(Reporting by Zhou Xin and Tom Miles; Editing by Alan Wheatley)

 
Comment by pressboardbox
2010-01-10 09:03:57

You know what pisses me off? “Double-Dip Recesssion” -What idiot thought up this phrase and whoever uses such retarded reference is even more brain dead than he who coined it. The implication is a brief slump then a resumption of the roaring “recovery”. This is bull$hit. Any lapse in the fake recovery perception would mean a loss in confidence in our government’s ability to control the economy which would lower the probability to zero of the chance of another orchestrated recovery being possible. “Failed Fake Recovery” would be much more fitting to describe a return to red ink in GDP growth. “Double Credit Bubble Pop” would even be better. What kind of idiots do the MSM spinmeisters take us for?

Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-10 09:30:40

Try to relax. There is a long flight of stairs to fall down and we’ve just bounced off the first one.

Comment by eudemon
2010-01-10 16:17:20

And at the bottom of those stairs just might be World War III.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 09:59:14

I believe the “double-dip” term reflects the technical definition of recession, which has to do with the NBER’s dating thereof and various definitional elements such as the number of consecutive quarters GDP goes up or down. Of course, whether the superficial impact of all manner of hair-of-the-dog stimuli in propping up GDP should qualify as ending the recession is another matter entirely…

Comment by mikey
2010-01-10 11:22:43

Mikey’s online diagnosis is that the Country we knew has flat lined and died.

Those little “w” squigglies are just from the Wall Street doctors of Doom and the politicians shaking the corpse for more money !

My bill is in the mail.

:)

 
 
Comment by Bungalowball
2010-01-10 10:08:06

I’m sort of joking, but perhaps out ability to conceive of shapes for the economy is limited by our language and alphabet? I’m not sure if this character will post correctly here, but the cyrillic russian letter below may be more appropriate than the “w-shaped” “recover” some are predicting:

Ц

Comment by Bungalowball
2010-01-10 10:23:05

or perhaps Щ

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:26:36

Ochen6 horror show!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bungalowball
2010-01-10 11:03:29

Amazing that we can still hold all these random bits of allusion inside our aging gullivers :-)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 11:14:27

The Russian alphabet seems a metaphorically idea source for the right letter to describe the course of a financial crisis.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 11:30:26

“ideal

Oh ‘L’…

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 09:15:49

Is “dismembering” a bank as unpleasant as it sounds? The choice of terms such as “dismember” and “carve out” certainly conjures up unsavory images.

For those who don’t recognize the name, Carmen Reinhardt is Kenneth Rogoff’s coauthor of the book “This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly,” which is available on Amazon dot com at a deflated price below $20 a copy.

Thomas Hoenig appears to be emerging from this crisis as a champion of the American free enterprise system, standing up to powerful, entrenched interests on Wall Street and K Street. May God grant him the strength to stand up against the monopoly power of the evil Megabanks and their minions.

Federal Reserve President Announces “Dismemberment” Of Large Financial Institutions Should Be Considered

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 01/05/2010 11:29

Bad news for fixed income market monopolist Goldman Sachs. Kansas City Fed President Thomas Hoenig, in response to a question from University of Maryland Professor Carmen Reinhardt said “dismembering firms is a fair thing to consider.” Hoenig further clarified that regulators “have people who are experts who understand what’s going on inside institutions who could figure out how to carve out” some parts of a financial institution if they are taking undue risks with taxpayer backing.” Surely, we expect Lloyd Blankfein to comment promptly on how even the Federal Reserve is now thoroughly underappreciating the divine nature of its prop/flow-focused business model, and how originating the proactively entire volume of OTC quote flow is just a natural side effect of completely cornering the CDS, bond and loan market.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-01-10 18:57:31

I dismember mama?

 
 
Comment by azrenter
2010-01-10 09:22:39

The best kind, consumers.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-01-10 09:31:57

MCClatchy is one of the few MSM outlets that are doing a good job digging up and exposing the corruption that caused the crash. Here’s an article on their continuing investigation of Goldman’s starring role. (It’s a few days old, so maybe it’s already been posted.)

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/329/story/81465.html

Comment by mikey
2010-01-10 11:33:51

“The documents include the offering circulars for 40 of Goldman’s estimated 148 deals in the Cayman Islands over a seven-year period, including a dozen of its more exotic transactions tied to mortgages and consumer loans that it marketed in 2006 and 2007, at the crest of the booming market for subprime mortgages to marginally qualified borrowers.”

Sheesh…We should just nuke those freakin’ Cayman Islands…and make everyone poor.

:)

 
Comment by mariner22
2010-01-10 14:11:00

When all is said and done, the cause of our problems is that we (individuals, companies, governments) spent money we did not have and it finally caught up to us.

Goldman Sachs et al only exploited the situation (and likely made it worse).

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 14:58:20

Right on. The greed and sleaze of the Banksters and REIC was enabled by millions of greedy/stupid people who chose to live beyond their means.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 17:43:17

Yeah, never mind the pesky little fact of the huge amount of mortgage WRITER fraud, right?

Let’s just keep the fairy tale of people being able to approve their own loans, alive, shall we?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-01-10 19:06:40

The magnitude of the crash was caused by the monster CDO’s and CDS’s written by and swapped amongst the big boyz. Had the crash only involved the liar loans and ‘retail level’ fraud of the credit bubble, it would have been far more manageable.

To lay all the blame at joe6pack’s feet is to not understand what just happened.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 17:38:01

Here’s even more fun GS facts: they paid 1% tax in 2008.

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/01082010/watch.html

And while we’re on the subject of socialism for the big corporations, here’s an oldie (2008) but goodie:

“Study says most corporations pay no U.S. income taxes”

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1249465620080812

I really, REALLY don’t want to hear any more damn lies about the oh so onerous taxation of big corps from any more tools. But feel free to out yourself anytime. I do so enjoy a parade of emperors without clothes.

(yeah, I’m feelin’ a little cranky today. Can you tell?)

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 17:40:27

GS paid 1% in taxes in 2008. Details coming.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 09:35:46

In case we have any Islamic posters here, please help me out. Doesn’t ‘Allah’ simply translate as ‘God’? If so, why should it be against the law for Christians to use it to describe their god?

Whatever happened to the notion of Freedom of Religion, anyway? It seems both the global ecclesiastic and banking sectors are ever increasingly dominated these days by oligopolistic cartels.

In Malaysia, Uproar Grows Over Use of Word ‘Allah’

By SETH MYDANS
Published: January 10, 2010

BANGKOK — An uproar among Muslims over the use of the word Allah by Christians spread over the weekend with the firebombing and vandalizing of several churches, increasing tensions in a country that is in the midst of far-reaching political changes.

Malaysian Christians prayed at a temporary location after their church was set ablaze by the unidentified attackers in Kuala Lumpur.

Arsonists struck three churches and a convent school early Sunday and splashed black paint on another church. This followed the firebombing of four churches on Friday and Saturday. No injuries were reported, and only one of the churches, Metro Tabernacle in the capital, Kuala Lumpur, suffered extensive damage.

The attacks, unlike anything Malaysia has seen before, have shaken a country where many Muslims are angry over a Dec. 31 court ruling that overturned a government ban on the use of the word Allah to denote the Christian God.

Comment by DennisN
2010-01-10 10:59:01

Especially since the Koran is viewed as being a “revised and corrected” copy of what may be called the Tanakh or the Old Testament.

Moslems even get upset when they hear of an English “translation” of the Koran, since it’s considered unholy to translate the Koran out of Arabic. The preferred term (e.g. you don’t get beheaded) is a copy of the Koran “interpreted” into English.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 11:12:30

Nice attitude:

“If you say anything about my religion, I will keel you.”

 
 
Comment by polly
2010-01-10 11:03:50

They think the use of “Allah” - which is the Arabic word for God and therefore not really necessary for language purposes if the primary language of the country isn’t Arabic - is intended to lure in Muslims to be converted. I believe that converting Muslims to other religions is illegal under sharia.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 09:45:01

Rethinking Vacation Homes ~ The New York Times

IN the heart of the winter, many homeowners may be romanticizing about a vacation home in warmer climes.

Fewer people had the opportunity to buy one last year, what with the mortgage crisis. Lenders now appear more willing to finance second homes, but borrowers must be patient, eminently qualified and strategic about their housing choices.

“People are beginning to see some opportunities, but they have to be strong borrowers,” said John Walsh, the president of Total Mortgage Services in Milford, Conn.

The improving conditions for borrowers, Mr. Walsh said, come mainly from the drop in vacation home prices, not any relaxation in lending standards. The lower prices, and lower loan amounts, make it easier for people to afford a second mortgage payment.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-owned companies that essentially dictate the lending standards for mortgages, have actually tightened requirements on second homes. Borrowers must now have credit scores of at least 660 and down payments of 20 percent to qualify; a year ago, the industry standard was a 620 or better credit score and at least 10 percent down.

While all borrowers have faced more scrutiny, lenders consider loans on second homes riskier than those on primary homes.

Because loan requirements were in such flux last year, many lenders opted not to take a chance on second-home mortgages, fearful of being forced by Fannie and Freddie to buy back the loans if the mortgages were not underwritten precisely according to specifications, said Ellen Bitton, the chief executive of Park Avenue Mortgage in Manhattan.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:25:17

Can anyone clarify the distinction between “full documentation” and “over documentation”?

And I am thinking a 30 percent “vacation home” market share of all purchases must still be a historically high anomaly. How much longer until the vacation home purchase bubble finishes deflating to historic norms?

“In a news release last November, the Realtor group* said that sales on higher-priced vacation properties had been hurt by lenders seeking large down payments and “over documentation” for even well-qualified borrowers seeking jumbo loans.

The group does not release its annual report on home sales until March, but at the end of 2008, the vacation-home market was already down from its peak, in 2005. That year, 40 percent of all sales were second homes. In 2008 the figure was 30 percent.”

* NAR

Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-01-10 11:49:43

It doesn’t matter how well qualified the borrowers is if their intend is
to walk on the owned property in favor of the new second residence .
In that this is the new scam ,If I was a lender I would say no ,but they don’t care if they get to pass the loan to the taxpayer . Maybe its just a simple matter of making them sign a paper that if they walk on the first house ,the bank has recourse ,in other words tie up the second residence with a contractor lien that they have recourse on the first residence .

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 17:58:49

I think that in the heart of this winter, many people are fantasizing about just being able to KEEP their house. :lol:

(another example of some people really needing to get out more often and come down from their ivory tower. “Second home” sheesh, yeah right) :roll:

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 09:47:08

Devaluation ups stakes in Venezuela election year

CARACAS, Jan 9 (Reuters) - Venezuelans rushed to the shops on Saturday, fearful of price rises after a currency devaluation that will let President Hugo Chavez boost government spending ahead of an election but feeds opposition charges of economic mismanagement.

In a bid to jump-start the recession-hit economy of South America’s top oil exporter, Chavez on Friday announced a dual system for the fixed rate bolivar.

It devalues the currency to 4.3 and 2.6 against the dollar, from a rate of 2.15 per dollar in place since 2005, giving the better rate for basic goods in an attempt to limit the impact of the measure on consumer prices.

Comment by BlueStar
2010-01-10 15:48:44

This is the net effect of importing inflation via the petro-dollar link. The same thing is happening in all the big oil countries. Look at the inflation rate with our biggest oil suppliers. You do realize that our FED’s discount rate is directly affecting their short term rates pushing them down while inflation is raging in their economies. If this goes on much longer Venezuela will dump the dollar link and switch to the Chinese yuan. Venezuela supplies the US with large % of our oil.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 09:48:46

Utah construction outlook 2010: Bleak

(The Enterprise) Despite many large construction projects looming on the horizon, industry analysts are predicting another down year for Utah’s construction industry in 2010.

In 2009, nonresidential construction in Utah fell almost 37 percent, the biggest single-year decline since the Great Depression. Commercial, permit-authorized construction fell to $1.2 billion from $1.9 billion in 2008, and will likely drop further in 2010.

James Wood, director of the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) predicts Utah construction will most likely have two more weak years. Commercial construction will total less than $1 billion in 2010 and 2011 before beginning to recover in 2012.

Construction workers, who make up 6 percent of Utah’s workforce, have experienced massive layoffs as companies have been forced to make cuts due to declining revenue and increased bid competition.

In 2007, Utah’s construction industry had 103,500 jobs, but lost over 12 percent in 2008. According to BEBR, only two years since World War II have had steeper declines in construction jobs: 1967 when jobs dropped by 13 percent, and 1987, when job losses reached 17 percent. The forecast for 2010 anticipates moderation in job losses but still a 6.9 percent drop and the loss of another 4,800 construction jobs.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:16:07

My FIL’s income is derived from the Utah construction sector. I am bracing myself accordingly for bad news next year…

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-10 10:31:13

I guess the Mormons aren’t getting any DC “Spending” $$$$$$$$$$$$$$, but I swear this past summer, Utah had a giant sign on the highway bypass going to Cedar City saying something like: “This road renovation is part of the Federal “Spending” Program blah, blah, blah…” ;-)

Comment by Wee Willy
2010-01-10 14:52:47

In Ontario we used to have highway construction signs like; ” This project part of new $9,000,000 highways plan, John Smith Minister of Highways” Motorists got so ticked off at seeing the politicians names on these signs that they paid less attention to the traffic thus having more accidents near these signs. The police finally made them stop putting up such signs.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 15:01:25

If we bait the Mormons enough, maybe we can get Olygal to come out of hiding.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 16:15:08

It’s worth a try…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by scdave
2010-01-10 10:55:32

With all the commercial space thats vacant, more to come, buildings selling far below replacement costs in the best locations and lenders taking the hit, how could anyone make a case for any rebound in this sector as far out as you can see…The whole building industry is in a structural transformation…1/2 the career jobs in that industry may be gone for at least a generation maybe two…Given how many people the construction industry employed across all sectors I believe the ramifications from this transformation in this industry has just begun…

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 11:04:59

“…how could anyone make a case…”

I expect lying liars to lie nonstop right through the duration of the real estate bust. Which reminds me, where is Eddie these days?

Comment by scdave
2010-01-10 11:24:17

+1 Bear….Funny….He is likely campaigning in Atlanta trying to split the county with the White Rich in the north from the…Ah….Well…Lets say….The remainder in the south….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by mikey
2010-01-10 11:48:18

It’s Sunday, Eddie is leading the Driud Services for the Tiny Troll True Believers at Stonehenge today.

:)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 12:21:04

Is there a job title for people in Eddie’s line of work? In case there is none, I am thinking “sucker fluffer” might describe his line of work quite well.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by pressboardbox
2010-01-10 12:44:12

I think he is in a closet somewhere pleasuring himself to a DJIA graph.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Eddie
2010-01-10 13:17:12

Now that’s funny.

 
 
Comment by Eddie
2010-01-10 13:24:22

Sorry dude, I do have other things to do. Busy week last week after 2 weeks on vacation. Lot’s of catching up. Billed close to 70 hours so it’s all good.

I did catch the Lennar blowout numbers though. More proof of the housing slide and general recession right? Nothing spells recession like home builders turning a profit for the first time in 3 years eh?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by iftheshoefits
2010-01-10 14:27:25

Good thing that one of them is still hanging on. Somebody’s going to have to get building to make up that shortage of rental units I’ve heard about, aren’t they?

 
Comment by polly
2010-01-10 14:29:00

Did you hear that tourism in NYC over the holiday season was down 4.5%?

 
Comment by Eddie
2010-01-10 15:04:16

No. I did hear that NYC overtook Orlando and Las Vegas as the #1 tourist destination though. Maybe it’s because I travel as much as I do and I’ve been to pretty much every major city in N. America and Europe, but to me a vacation needs two things: sun and beach. I can’t for the life of me see the attraction of going to NYC in winter. Spend the day at FAO Schwartz with elbow to elbow with 5000 other tourists and then spend 20 mins trying to hail a taxi in freezing weather…fun!

I’ll take a sandy white beach next to warm, clear blue water sipping fruity drinks all day in December. Each to their own though.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 15:45:56

Did you happen to catch this article during the course of your busy week?

Handsome government handout for homebuilders
By Colin Barr, senior writerJanuary 7, 2010: 1:00 PM ET

NEW YORK (Fortune) — Talk about cash for clunkers.

Lennar (LEN), the Miami-based homebuilder that has been gushing red ink since its misguided bets on house prices went bad three years ago, on Thursday posted its first quarterly profit since 2007 — thanks to a handout from Congress.

 
Comment by Eddie
2010-01-10 16:08:04

No but makes sense. And they will keep doing it. And home prices will keep rising as will sales. I don’t get why it’s so hard for you all to get this through your heads. Obama is not going to stop spending.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 16:38:24

“And home prices will keep rising as will sales.”

You may well be right — only time will tell. But I am going to stick with my assumption that there will be no sustained recovery in home prices until jobs and incomes recover, and these are not going to happen (at least in California) for several more years at least.

Perhaps it is different in Atlanta?

 
Comment by iftheshoefits
2010-01-10 18:08:41

“And home prices will keep rising as will sales.”

Just like rental prices are rising, right? If you’d for once acknowledge that your claim about rental prices and availability turned out to be fantastically dead wrong, maybe other things you say might be more seriously. As it is, you’ve only demonstrated that you’ll say anything, no matter how stupid and demonstrably false.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 19:17:36

“If you’d for once acknowledge that your claim about rental prices and availability turned out to be fantastically dead wrong, maybe other things you say might be more seriously.”

Troll tactic numero uno: Never, ever concede that you were spectacularly, laughably wrong about anything.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 19:20:29

“No but makes sense. And they will keep doing it.”

Are you assuming the Wall Street-listed hope builders are going to survive forever on government handouts?

Just trying to understand the point you were trying to make in your cryptic post.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-01-10 20:22:43

I think the point was he hadn’t read the link and assumed it was about the home-buyer’s credit, not a one-time tax windfall.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 23:12:44

“I’ll take a sandy white beach next to warm, clear blue water sipping fruity drinks all day in December. Each to their own though.”

Eddie — You should (seriously now) check out San Diego for your next beach vacation. The tourism industry here is in the toilet, and you can get primo beach accomodations for a song compared to what they cost in the first 1/2 decade of the 2000s. And there is no shortage of open sand on which to lay out your beach blanket. Recessions are good for vacationers with bank.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2010-01-10 09:52:31

Aye carramba! Cash es basuda en Caracas.

CARACAS – President Hugo Chavez, harried by recession and declining popularity, announced a major currency devaluation late Friday to shore up government finances and stimulate economic growth before key elections this year.

The move cuts Mr. Chavez’s two-year-old “strong bolivar” currency by half – to 4.3 per dollar from 2.15 per dollar – for most imports and transactions. The central bank will also subsidize a stronger 2.6-per-dollar rate for imports of food, medicine and other essential items, Mr. Chavez said.

WSJ: Chavez Devalues Venezuela’s Currency

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:02:13

Is the “strong bolivar” policy anything akin to the “strong dollar” policy we enjoy?

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:37:56

* The Wall Street Journal
* FOREIGN EXCHANGE
* JANUARY 9, 2010

Dollar Falls; Euro Tops $1.44

BY FABIO ALVES

NEW YORK—The dollar tumbled against major rivals Friday after a disappointing job report discouraged bets the U.S. Federal Reserve will raise interest rates in the near future.

The report had been billed as a key marker for the greenback. A positive reading would have cemented the dollar’s recent gains, limiting its role as cheap funding currency for riskier assets on expectations the Fed will lift rate sooner rather than later.

But as the U.S. economy lost more jobs than expected in December, bets on higher U.S. rates were pared back and investors snapped up higher-yielding currencies.

“It all boils down …”

Yes indeed.

Comment by Eddie
2010-01-10 15:32:49

Sean Penn, Michael Moore and Barry H. Obama were unavailable for comment.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 18:05:31

And of course “…lost more jobs than expected…” means a recovery, right? :lol:

 
 
 
 
Comment by pinch-a-penny
2010-01-10 10:11:19

Well, if you had dollars, you would have doubled your worth….
This was not a surprise, as thugo was having problems controlling his country. Venezuela is rapidly becoming a socialist paradise, with all its wonderful by-products.
Foreign investment dropped off to almost nothing.
Internal production of goods and serivices has been depleted.
They are rationing water and electricity (electricity because they have failed to maintain their equipment, therefore it has broken down)
they import most of their food.
they import natural gas to pump out their oil
their oil production is at its lowest in ages.
there is a major upswing in crime.
there is a major upswing in corruption.
Thugo has now “officilized” the graft and corruption by going to a dual exchange rate. Those in the inner circle, get to buy stuff at the lower rate, and sell it at the higher rate. Way to go.
They have “nationalized” most of their private enterprise, and given them to the unions. Those companies do not produce anything any more.

Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-10 13:30:51

“if you had dollars, you would have doubled your worth”

Maybe just avoided the 50% haircut. Want to bet on which exchange rate they give you at the bank if you try to convert?

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-10 15:50:36

Followup on the story is that Chavez will confiscate any busines that raises prices due to increased cost of imports!

Are there any businesses left that he hasn’t confiscated?

 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 15:02:48

Isn’t socialism grand?

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 18:07:57

Especially if you’re a big corporation in America! Hooray!

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 10:01:43

The mini ice age starts here
10th January 2010 Daily Mail (UK)

The bitter winter afflicting much of the Northern Hemisphere is only the start of a global trend towards cooler weather that is likely to last for 20 or 30 years, say some of the world’s most eminent climate scientists.

Their predictions – based on an analysis of natural cycles in water temperatures in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans – challenge some of the global warming orthodoxy’s most deeply cherished beliefs, such as the claim that the North Pole will be free of ice in
summer by 2013.

According to the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre in Colorado, Arctic summer sea ice has increased by 409,000 square miles, or 26 per cent, since 2007 – and even the most committed global warming activists do not dispute this.

Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 10:06:50

Hard Freeze to Spread Southward in Florida Following Rare Snow, Sleet.

Snow and sleet is making a rare occurrence in central Florida along the Interstate 4 corridor. The wintry weather is falling along the leading edge of an arctic air mass. As more frigid air pours into the South and East this weekend and increases energy demands, subfreezing temperatures along the Gulf Coast will threaten the citrus crop and other fruits and vegetables in the region.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:35:45

There has never been a better time to own orange juice futures.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:08:52

Is this considered to be more evidence that global warming is real?

 
Comment by pinch-a-penny
2010-01-10 10:15:18

Hey, wait a second…. I was told we were going to roast up here in New England by the global warming advocates….
They want to tax my breath to make sure that the polar bears are nice and chilled…
I WAS LIED TO!!!!

Comment by Muggy
2010-01-10 10:31:36

Sounds great, this freezing weather has been awesome in Florida.

Comment by eudemon
2010-01-10 16:04:14

Iguana soup, anyone? Make mine with some orange peel…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Lip
2010-01-10 12:03:43

What has Al Gore been doing lately?

Usually it takes a major global warming conference to have weather like this.

Comment by eudemon
2010-01-10 16:00:09

Maybe he and Tipper are thinking about censoring music lyrics again. Give them all something Big Government-y to do.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 18:15:25

“Thermodynamic oscillation” Basic high school physics. Look it up. Also “disruption of equilibrium.” I hope I’m not using words that are too big, am I?

They say that the world can be divided into two types of people: those who understand the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics and those who don’t.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 10:04:10

Cold snap triggers power shortage in China’s coal heartland ~ AFP

CHINA’S coal-rich Shanxi province faced its most severe power shortage in three years as severe cold weather continued to drive up national electricity demand, state media reported today.

The northern province was rationing electricity as two major coal-fired electricity plants in the capital Taiyuan saw their coal reserves fall below the seven-day supply warning level, the official Xinhua news agency reported.

Shanxi is China’s coal heartland, the biggest producer of a fossil fuel that provides 70 per cent of the nation’s fast-growing energy needs. It is also home to many coal-burning power plants.

But the province now faces shortages because of falling production and having to export large amounts of coal to other parts of China, Li Jianwei, an official with the province’s electricity association, said.

Taiyuan has ordered rotating shutdowns for more than 40 factories to ensure residences have enough power.

A spate of deadly mine accidents has also forced officials in Shanxi to close thousands of small mines.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:44:05

This global warming business is really getting out of hand (shiver!)…

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 18:16:52

My state just went through the worse drought and highest summer temperatures on record.

Comment by Cowtown
2010-01-11 10:46:32

Mine didn’t. Your point?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:11:50

Here is one way to quickly resolve the problem of burdensome pension obligations. I don’t believe this would be legal in the USA, but perhaps at least some other developed countries lack the same pension protections we enjoy.

Transportation
Japan Air Could Dissolve Pensions: Report
By Robert Holmes 01/10/10 - 10:53 AM EST

TOKYO (TheStreet) — Japan Airlines is considering a move to dissolve its pension fund for retirees if they choose to reject a 30% cut in payouts, according to a published report.

Japan Air, which is eyeing a court-led bankruptcy, needs to win the agreement of more than two-thirds of its 9,000 retirees. If not, the state-run agency restructuring Asia’s largest airline will likely close the pension fund, according to a Bloomberg report. The Yomiuri newspaper said that the pension fund has 291.8 billion yen ($3.15 billion) in assets.

Comment by DennisN
2010-01-10 11:03:15

Private pensions are protected in the US by ERISA.

Interesting question: does ERISA apply to GOVERNMENT union pensions? :)

Comment by polly
2010-01-10 11:26:55

I don’t think you can say that ERISA protects pensions in the US. ERISA is a law. PBGC is an agency.

Why are you distinguishing between government pensions and government union pensions? If you are a government employee and have a pension, the fact that you may or may not belong to a union is irrelevant. Are you talking about a pension run by a union of government employees? Never heard of one.

Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2010-01-10 15:30:45

I don’t think you can say that ERISA protects pensions in the US.

What is the purpose of ERISA’s minimum funding requirements, if not to protect pensions?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by skroodle
2010-01-10 11:03:59

JAL has $350k in assets per retiree. A decent interest rate and that would be plenty.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 10:32:55

China vows to keep “hot money” out of property market.
Sun Jan 10, 2010

BEIJING (Reuters) - China vowed on Sunday not to let foreign speculative investment affect the property market, the latest expression of official concern that real-estate prices are racing ahead too fast.

China

The directive from the State Council, China’s cabinet, will serve as a guideline for local authorities and ministries, including the People’s Bank of China and the China Banking Regulatory Commission, to work out detailed policies.

“Relevant departments must enhance monitoring of loans and cross-border investment to prevent illegal inflows of capital into the property market and to avoid the impact of overseas hot money on China’s real-estate market,” the cabinet said.

It said the central bank and banking regulator should step up oversight and “window guidance” of mortgage lending.

About one-sixth of China’s nearly 10 trillion yuan ($1.5 trillion) in new loans last year flowed into the property sector.

Concerned that a property bubble could stir social and economic instability, Beijing has vowed to combat overly fast price increases, although its moves to date, such as restricting sales tax exemptions, have been relatively mild.

The cabinet urged local authorities, especially in cities where housing prices are rising sharply, to increase the supply of affordable housing.

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 10:39:32

I love watching hypocrites like this fool melt down, Reid is toast. He can take his ill gotten gains and head back to Porch Light NV.

Reid apologizes for ‘no Negro dialect’ comment.

WASHINGTON(AP) – The top Democrat in the U.S. Senate apologized on Saturday for comments he made about Barack Obama’s race during the 2008 presidential bid and are quoted in a yet-to-be-released book about the campaign.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada described in private then-Sen. Barack Obama as “light skinned” and “with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.” Obama is the nation’s first African-American president.

“I deeply regret using such a poor choice of words. I sincerely apologize for offending any and all Americans, especially African-Americans for my improper comments,” Reid said in a statement released after the excerpts were first reported on the Web site of The Atlantic.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:53:18

‘no Negro dialect’

Is Reid going senile? His terminology is what, maybe three decades out of date?

Comment by skroodle
2010-01-10 11:05:55

Isn’t that how they are still referred to in LDS documents?

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 11:28:12

Before or after God told the LDS prophet to extend the priesthood to blacks?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 19:43:48

Is this about what Uncle Harry Remus had in mind?

“He come mighty nigh it, honey, sho’s you born–Brer Fox did. One day atter Brer Rabbit fool ‘im wid dat calamus root, Brer Fox went ter wuk en got ‘im some tar, en mix it wid some turkentime, en fix up a contrapshun w’at he call a Tar-Baby, en he tuck dish yer Tar-Baby en he sot ‘er in de big road, en den he lay off in de bushes fer to see what de news wuz gwine ter be. En he didn’t hatter wait long, nudder, kaze bimeby here come Brer Rabbit pacin’ down de road–lippity-clippity, clippity -lippity–dez ez sassy ez a jay-bird. Brer Fox, he lay low. Brer Rabbit come prancin’ ‘long twel he spy de Tar-Baby, en den he fotch up on his behime legs like he wuz ’stonished. De Tar Baby, she sot dar, she did, en Brer Fox, he lay low.”

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 10:59:06

Another little ditty,by BJ Clinton. Got to love the embracing diversity crowd…

Teddy’s anger
One of the enduring mysteries of the 2008 campaign was what got Ted Kennedy so mad at Bill Clinton. The former president’s entreaties, at some point, backfired, and the explanation has never quite emerged.

I’ve finally gotten my hands on a copy of Game Change, in which John Heliemann and Mark Halperin report:

[A]s Hillary bungled Caroline, Bill’s handling of Ted was even worse. The day after Iowa, he phoned Kennedy and pressed for an endorsement, making the case for his wife. But Bill then went on, belittling Obama in a manner that deeply offended Kennedy. Recounting the conversation later to a friend, Teddy fumed that Clinton had said, A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee.

Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-10 13:39:28

The mere suggestion of that Kennedy being rightously indignant sends a shiver down my spine.

 
 
Comment by DennisN
2010-01-10 11:12:11

Hey at least Reid didn’t call him a mulatto fella.

Younger people may not know this, but during American apartheid there was an entire glossary of terms describing how black or how white a person was to be considered.

Census questionaires still require people to check “one only” box for racial status. Too bad we can’t “check all that apply”.

Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-10 13:42:44

Next to the Question “Sex?” I pencil in “Yes”.

 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 15:10:49

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31302.html

I love watching hypocrites like this fool melt down, Reid is toast

Speaking of liberal hypocrites, Bill Clinton, the so-called “first black President by the adoring MSM, made some blatantly racist comments of his own about Obama to, of all people, Ted Kenedy - who apparently dimed him out.

When I was in college I used to play pool at a redneck/biker bar that had a rough reputation. Thing is, on any given day you’d see at least one black dude at the bar or shooting pool, far more welcome and safe than any white preppie would’ve been.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-11 00:40:16

“…Thing is, on any given day you’d see at least one black dude at the bar or shooting pool, far more welcome and safe than any white preppie would’ve been.” ;-)

Well you must not have gone to college say, In Montana…because when that would some how happen …here’s what the muttering would have been translated into: “eh, what’s wrong with this picture?”

 
 
Comment by eudemon
2010-01-10 15:56:30

Reid’s white, is he not?

Is Obama going to go on national TV to disparage Reid for his infraction? He certainly did so this past spring, in regards to the whole white cop/black homeowner snit.

Sounds like another photo-op for Obama. The One and Reid can go on television, discuss it and drink coffee together. Obama will have to lower his chin though, lest he dribble some coffee on it. I don’t know what Reid will do, because apparently he IS a racist (unlike the cop).

Maybe Reid can run for elected office in West Virginnie. Take over for Hyde, maybe.

 
Comment by exeter
2010-01-10 19:29:11

I often wonder if the family values hypocrites in the party of perverts will every change.

Notable nutjobs include:

Mark Sanford
Ted Haggard
Larry Craig
Mark Foley
Vito Fosella
John Ensign

Talk about hypocrisy

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 10:42:20

For the unemployed, a new job in this economy often means less pay than they’re used to. ~AP

Unemployed for nearly a year, David Becker was relieved to land a new job in information technology last summer.

The offer carried a price, though: It was a lower-rung job than the one Becker had lost. He had to uproot his family from Wisconsin to Nevada. And, like many formerly jobless people who find work these days, Becker is now paid far less than before — $25,000 less.

It’s one of the bleak realities of the economic recovery: Even as more employers are starting to hire, the new jobs typically pay less than the ones that were lost.

In the government’s data, a job is a job. More jobs point to a growing economy. But to people who used to earn $60,000, a new $40,000 job means they’ll spend less — and contribute less to the recovery.

“In most cases, it means a subdued expansion, for sure,” said Marisa Di Natale, director at Moody’s Economy.com.

Comment by scdave
2010-01-10 11:09:59

But to people who used to earn $60,000, a new $40,000 job means they’ll spend less ??

Nice post wmbz….The most underestimated issue facing our economy and its future impact…..Its not cyclical…This is structural change….

Comment by In Colorado
2010-01-10 13:34:57

It won’t be long until 2009 will be considered to have been a “good year” for the automotive sector.

But the sheeple keep believing things will eventually “bounce back” and all the unemployemed men will soon be busy building houses again.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 18:25:33

Nothing new here. This is the exact formula for every single recession since the 1970s.

At the height of our recent lovely bubble, I was working in a factory with people 40+ who, TO A MAN, were making 33% less (or worse) than they were in the 80 and 90s.

This factory employed THOUSANDS.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 10:46:51

So if the “public option” is DOA what in the hell is buried in the 2000+ page stinking pile of BS? ‘It’ will be one giant assed mess.

Government health insurance option appears doomed.
House Democrats pursue alternatives to government-run insurance option in health care overhaul.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Senior House Democrats have largely abandoned hopes of including a government-run insurance option in the final compromise health care bill taking shape, according to several officials, and are pushing for other measures to rein in private insurers.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other senior Democrats told President Barack Obama in recent meetings they want the legislation to strip the insurance industry of a long-standing exemption from federal antitrust laws, officials said. That provision is in the House-passed measure, but was omitted from the bill that the Senate passed on Christmas Eve.

They also want the final measure to include a House-passed proposal for a nationwide insurance exchange, to be regulated by the federal government, where consumers could shop for private coverage. The Senate bill calls for a state-based system of exchanges.

Additionally, House Democrats want to require insurers to spend a minimum amount of premium income on benefits, thereby limiting what is available for salaries, bonuses, advertising and other items. The House bill sets the floor at 85 percent; the Senate-passed measure lowers it to 80 percent for policies sold to small groups and individuals.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the negotiations are private.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 11:17:15

Squid approach to health care legislation:

Blind the electorate with a cloud of ink.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 11:22:35

By contrast, here is an example of a piece of legislation which seems to be of reasonable length. And here is another one.

 
 
Comment by Lip
2010-01-10 12:17:15

I’ve had to see a bunch of doctors lately for my end of the year checkups and I’ve asked every one what they thought about the new healthcare bills. One had these thoughts:

1) Congress’ intent is do drive the insurance companies out of insurance, creating discontent within the populace and allowing them to encourage the public option in the future.

2) Insurance companies will begin to fight this process by clenching even harder to their money, thus fullfilling #1.

3) Congress has no idea how to manage healthcare, they will be way in over their heads and the public option will be even worse than some us have even dreamed.

4) Many doctors will opt to retire or go into other lines of work, since they will not be willing to listen to a bureaucrat’s thoughts on how an injury or an illness should be treated.

5) The resulting reduction in the number of doctors and the influx of many new patients (due to free healthcare) will result in longer waiting lines for the patients.

In conclusion, they’re hoping to replace the medical insurance companies with government bureaucrats. We can fire the insurance companies, we can argue with them and we can sue them. I don’t think we’ll be able to do any of these things to the bureaucrats.

Comment by polly
2010-01-10 15:29:46

“4) Many doctors will opt to retire or go into other lines of work, since they will not be willing to listen to a bureaucrat’s thoughts on how an injury or an illness should be treated.”

If this happens, then we can redirect a bunch of H1B Visas to well trained foreign doctors where it will actually do us some good. Especially since they nearly all did medical school at the expense of their governments. We can free ride on their educations. Good short term option. Lets try it.

 
Comment by eudemon
2010-01-10 15:39:42

“We” might not, but the military could.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 18:29:18

What a shame since the insurance companies are doing SUCH a great job!

(no no, it just SOUNDS like sarcasm)

 
 
Comment by eudemon
2010-01-10 15:45:01

…”because the negotiations are private.”

Why, of course they are! Since when is the federal government obligated to run anything past the tax-paying electorate?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:49:01

How about a little Sunday morning handwriting on the wall for countries which don’t keep their fiscal houses in order?

* JANUARY 9, 2010

Court Reinstates Fired Central-Bank Chief
Argentina’s Constitutional Crisis Escalates as Judge Blocks President Kirchner From Using Reserves to Pay National Debt

By MATT MOFFETT and MATTHEW COWLEY

BUENOS AIRES — A federal judge blocked President Cristina Kirchner from using foreign-currency reserves to pay Argentina’s national debt and revoked her dismissal of the central-bank chief who opposed that policy.

The twin legal defeats for the government injected further uncertainty in the battle for control of the central-bank reserves. The dispute, which has put Argentina on the verge of a constitutional crisis and placed the president and the opposition-controlled Congress at loggerheads, led to a selloff in the country’s bond and stock markets.

On Friday morning, federal judge Maria Jose Sarmiento granted an injunction request by two opposition parties barring the central bank from transferring money into the so-called Bicentennial Fund, which Mrs. Kirchner had hoped to create with $6.57 billion from the reserves.

A few hours later, Judge Sarmiento ordered the reinstatement of the bank president, Martín Redrado, whom Mrs. Kirchner dismissed on Thursday for refusing to make the transfer.

The Kirchner administration said it will appeal the two decisions.

Argentine television showed Mr. Redrado returning to the bank Friday afternoon. Earlier in the day he defended his action in defying Mrs. Kirchner. “The reserves belong to all Argentines and if they are to be used for some purpose besides backing the currency, the matter should go before Congress,” he said.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:59:27

Here is another:

Icelandic views on repaying debt to British and Dutch

Icelanders tell the BBC what they think of their president’s decision to reject a bill to repay $5.4bn (£3.4bn) to the British and Dutch governments in the wake of an Icelandic bank collapse.

Many think the Icesave bill is too hard on taxpayers, while others see it as the only way to restore their country to economic normality - and allow it to join the EU. The Icelandic parliament is preparing a referendum on the bill.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 11:08:20

More scribbling on the wall:

World’s tallest tower opens in debt-hit Dubai

By Simeon Kerr in Dubai

Published: January 3 2010 18:33 | Last updated: January 4 2010 19:33

Dubai will on Monday open the world’s largest tower as the city seeks to revitalise its economy after 2009’s annus horribilis was capped by a debt crisis and a second $10bn bail-out loan from neighbouring Abu Dhabi.

The government hopes the unveiling of the 160-plus storey structure will pierce the cloud that has lingered over Dubai since it was forced to accept further financial support from the capital of the United Arab Emirates and investors turned their backs on the city, once the darling of international finance.

Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum, after navigating the worst crisis in his four years as ruler of Dubai, will lead a day of celebrations to unveil the residential, hotel and office building, which offers views across the Gulf to Iran.

For a city founded on superlatives, the achievement of delivering Burj Dubai’s half-mile high tower in six years is triggering a wave of hyperbole that has not been silenced by last month’s crisis of confidence over the city’s $100bn debt mountain. The official news agency called it “another unique achievement by Dubai to be added to the pages of humanity’s modern history”.

Comment by mikey
2010-01-10 11:56:30

“…The official news agency called it “another unique achievement by Dubai to be added to the pages of humanity’s modern history”.

…they then snickered and called it our Atantis of the Sands.

;)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 12:17:42

Briefing

Asset markets
The danger of the bounce

Jan 7th 2010
From The Economist print edition
Once again, cheap money is driving up asset prices

THE opening of the Burj Khalifa, the world’s tallest building, in Dubai on January 4th had symbolic as well as architectural significance. Skyscrapers have long been associated with the ends of financial booms. The Empire State Building opened in 1931, two years after the Wall Street crash. The Petronas towers in Kuala Lumpur were unveiled in 1998, in the depths of the Asian crisis. Such towers are commissioned when money is cheap and optimism about economic growth is at its height; they are often finished when the champagne has gone flat.

The past three decades have been good for skyscraper-building. The cost of borrowing money, in nominal terms, has fallen sharply (see chart 1). Small wonder that one bubble after another has appeared in financial markets, with the subjects of investors’ dreams ranging from emerging markets and technology stocks in the 1990s to residential housing in the decade just ended. Nor is it surprising, with money so cheap, that consumers and companies have indulged in regular borrowing sprees.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 12:14:41

There certainly is no current shortage of inauspicious graffiti.
But not to worry: A Japanese-style two-decade-long asset price decline cannot happen here, because this is America!

Leaders
Markets
Bubble warning

Jan 7th 2010
From The Economist print edition

Markets are too dependent on unsustainable government stimulus. Something’s got to give

Alamy/Shutterstock

THE effect of free money is remarkable. A year ago investors were panicking and there was talk of another Depression. Now the MSCI world index of global share prices is more than 70% higher than its low in March 2009. That’s largely thanks to interest rates of 1% or less in America, Japan, Britain and the euro zone, which have persuaded investors to take their money out of cash and to buy risky assets.

For all the panic last year, asset values never quite reached the lows that marked other bear-market bottoms, and now the rally has made several markets look pricey again. In the American housing market, where the crisis started, homes are priced at around fair value on the basis of rental yields, but they are overvalued by almost 30% in Britain and by 50% in Australia, Hong Kong and Spain.

Investors tempted to take comfort from the fact that asset prices are still below their peaks would do well to remember that they may yet fall back a very long way. The Japanese stock market still trades at a quarter of the high it reached 20 years ago. The NASDAQ trades at half the level it reached during dotcom mania. Today the prices of many assets are being held up by unsustainable fiscal and monetary stimulus. Something has to give.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 18:33:50

Like I said, the current run-up is just a setup to loot the 401s and small investors again.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-01-10 20:30:49

In the American housing market, where the crisis started, homes are priced at around fair value on the basis of rental yields

say what?

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 10:50:38

Which alternative version of reality does your favorite central banker prefer?

* JANUARY 8, 2010, 10:30 A.M. ET

World’s Central Banks Face Different Realities

BY MICHAEL CASEY

NEW YORK — All signs suggest the global economy is undergoing a solid recovery. But a striking gap exists between how central bankers in developed countries that are still reeling from the 2008 credit crisis and those in places benefiting from a China-led boom view this recovery.

In the past couple of days, the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England demonstrated their resistance to any premature removal of so-called “quantitative easing” policies while the People’s Bank of China moved the other way, incrementally tightening monetary conditions by modestly increasing its three-month T-bills rate.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 18:35:13

“Solid recovery?” Those boys need to put down the crack pipe.

 
 
Comment by SUGuy
2010-01-10 11:17:40

Does anybody on this blog have had any experience buying an REO from bank? We have large banks such as Deutsche Bank, HSBC who are holding on to a huge inventory of homes. How long can they drag their feet to unload these properties? At the present time they are asking their wishing prices and some properties just sit there for years (2) in one case.

The Coming Housing Crisis in Spain, and What It Means for Europe
Economic woes in Europe’s

PIGS (an acronym for Portugal, Ireland, Greece, and Spain, states at the periphery of the EU) have been grabbing headlines recently. Greece’s swan dive has gotten the most attention so far, but there’s likely another economy in line for the springboard: Spain.

It’s only just now started to show up on everyone’s radar, too. When all attention was on housing prices, Spain looked relatively stable: Over the last year, average housing prices dropped a mere 9%. As HSBC bank put it (italics added), “The [price fall] is much smaller than the 20% peak-to-trough drop seen for the UK housing market or the 32% fall of US housing prices, and is difficult to explain given the dominance of the housing market in the Spanish economy.”

Not so difficult. Spanish banks are holding all the properties. It’s a repeat of a strategy from the early 1990’s, when local banks held onto their property portfolios until economic recovery caught up and let them unload the properties at acceptable prices. Makes perfect sense — if it worked before, why not try it again?

The only problem is Spain’s “resilient” property market is likely ready to evaporate. The Bank of Spain has doubled the amount local banks must set aside to cushion repossessed property losses, and with liquidity already hard to come by, the banks have no option but to sell their properties. June estimates by Spanish bank BBVA said that housing prices would drop by 10% in 2009 and 12% in 2010, with a total 30% peak-to-trough drop. A December review hasn’t changed those numbers.

We’ve all seen the devastating impact of a 30% drop in housing prices in the U.S. Imagine what it might do to a country that already has the Eurozone’s second-worst unemployment rate (nearly 20%, second only to Latvia), whose credit outlook has been downgraded to negative, and whose budget shortfall for 2009 is five times last year’s levels.

Keep also in mind that Spain is the Eurozone’s fifth-largest economy, which, because of its buoyant property sector, has been a vital intra-Eurozone source of demand for export-reliant markets like Germany.

If Spain’s domestic financial system becomes more unstable, the shockwaves will be felt throughout asset and interbank markets. Keeping your European investments safe in a world economy this turbulent requires constant updates on market moves all over the Eurozone.

http://www.elliottwave.com/freeupdates/archives/2010/01/07/The-Coming-Housing-Crisis-in-Spain-and-What-It-Means-for-Europe.aspx

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 11:36:39

Is this a good example of “change we can believe in”?

The Associated Press January 9, 2010, 12:43PM ET

In Foreclosureville, USA, so much change

By EVELYN NIEVES
MORE FROM BUSINESSWEEK

STOCKTON, Calif.

Stockton hardly looks like the most miserable city in the country.

But the statistics and stories over the last two years make a case that it is: Since the housing crisis began, this inland port city 80 miles east of San Francisco has had one of the worst foreclosure rates in the country — for most of the time, the worst.

At the height of it, about 1 in 10 houses fell to foreclosure. Houses that sold for more than $500,000 before the crash now go for $200,000. In some neighborhoods, fixer-uppers cost less than a new Honda Fit — under $20,000.

To spend time in Stockton, a plain-jane city of single-family home neighborhoods edged by freeways and lingering farms, is to begin to understand the calamitous effects of the nation’s foreclosure crisis, which has devastated so many once-booming places.

Stockton is the San Joaquin County seat. And according to the Associated Press Economic Stress Index, a month-by-month scoring of U.S. counties’ rates of unemployment, bankruptcy and foreclosures, San Joaquin had a score of 23.55 in November, making it the fourth-most stressed of counties with a population over 25,000. Its foreclosure rate of 6 percent was exceeded only by metro Las Vegas, metro Fort Myers, Fla., metro Orlando, Merced County, Calif., and Kendall County, Ill.

An outsider might not notice immediately how Stockton has suffered. It boasts a downtown mall, a mix of handsome, century-old and modern architecture, a new sports stadium, even a promenade overlooking the city’s canal.

But two years into the housing crisis, Stockton is a changed place. Whole neighborhoods have been decimated by the mortgage disaster. The tax base has shrunken. City services and municipal jobs have been cut. Unemployment hovers at about 16 percent. Economists predict it will take years for Stockton to recover from the housing bust.

Comment by SDGreg
2010-01-10 12:49:40

Stockton wasn’t a garden spot before the bubble. Is it that much worse than pre-bubble now that the bubble has burst?

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 15:42:41

If home prices have dropped from $500,000 to under $200,000 (and in some cases, $20,000), then it sounds like it might actually be on an improving trend, at least from the standpoint of housing affordability.

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 18:36:57

Not to worry. The “solid recovery” is underway!

 
 
Comment by Dave of the North
2010-01-10 11:53:04

Funny word that should be a word: (I don’t know who coined it.)

“Cashtration (n.): The act of buying a house, which renders the subject financially impotent for an indefinite period of time. “

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 18:40:12

Rich Hall invented the concept of “words that aren’t but should be. They are called “sniglets.”

“Many sniglets are portmanteau words, a comedic style often traced to Lewis Carroll.” - Wikipedia

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 19:50:29

HBB favorite sniglets: pigman, bankster, greedpig, realtwhore, sheeple, more?

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 12:03:57

Has San Diego ever in modern times even experienced a tsunami?

Tsunami spending? Wave your money bye

By Michael Stetz, UNION-TRIBUNE COLUMNIST

Sunday, January 10, 2010 at 2:50 a.m.

A Tsunami Evacuation Route sign at the corner of Spray Street and Brighton Avenue in Ocean Beach shows what direction to take away from the beach.

Eduardo Contreras / Union-Tribune

Imperial Beach spent $47,000 in grant money. San Diego County, $30,000. San Diego City has received $1,500 and may seek another $150,000 to protect us from a terrible tsunami.

All we need, I guess, is a terrible tsunami. Not that I’m rooting for one, but they’re so rare here, one has to wonder why we’re forking over all this money to protect us from one.

Oops.

I’m not in government.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 12:08:33

Have torch, will collect insurance claims…

Suspicious fire damages home
By Kristina Davis, UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
Saturday, January 9, 2010 at 9:55 a.m.

SAN DIEGO — Arson investigators are working to determine the cause of a fire that damaged a home in the Southcrest neighborhood early Saturday.

The fire was reported about 3:30 a.m. on Newton Avenue near 37th Street, and arriving firefighters saw heavy smoke billowing from the back of the single-story home, according to the San Diego Fire-Rescue Department.

The blaze was knocked down about 10 minutes later. The home was vacant, and no one was injured.

 
Comment by sheila bear
2010-01-10 12:26:42

UPDATE 1-Horizon Bank first U.S. bank failure of 2010
Fri Jan 8, 2010 9:59pm

WASHINGTON, Jan 8 (Reuters) - U.S. regulators closed Horizon Bank (HRZB.O) of Bellingham, Washington, on Friday, kicking off what has been forecast as a peak year for small bank failures.

From a Business Person of the Year [Bellingham] page showing candidates from March 2004:

“Over his entire career at the bank, Evans is proud that Horizon has maintained high standards of asset quality and efficiency.”

“Shareholders, of course, demand significant return on investment. Federal regulators demand adherence to laws to maintain liquidity.”

http://www.businesspulse.com/businesspulse/bp2004/march/0304bpbpoyperson.html#evans

 
Comment by pressboardbox
2010-01-10 12:33:36

Support for Ben’s foreclosure shadow inventory conspiracy theory:

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/topstories/story/1171171.html

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 18:44:13

Good find, but in my neighborhood, it’s no conspiracy, but instead, a fact.

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2010-01-10 12:42:07

I bet they are waking up in Caracas wishing they had some of the none dividend paying barbarous relic, laying around, collecting dust.

Jan. 10 (Bloomberg) — Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said that businesses have no reason to raise prices following the devaluation of the bolivar and that the government will seize any entity that boosts its prices.

Chavez said he’ll create an anti-speculation committee to monitor prices after private businesses said that prices would double and consumers rushed to buy household appliances and televisions. The government is the only authority able to dictate price increases, he said.

Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 14:19:30

“I bet they are waking up in Caracas wishing they had some of the none dividend paying barbarous relic, laying around, collecting dust”.

I’d bet you are correct!

 
Comment by 2banana
2010-01-10 14:31:08

I bet they wished they had USD even more!

:-)

 
 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2010-01-10 13:16:27

Brilliant analysis of the situation.

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/01082010/watch.html

Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 14:53:35

Good piece, and all so true. However the problems will not be fixed, the system has to break down completely for any real change to happen. That will not occur anytime soon, far to many folks with their hands in the ‘free’ money cookie jar.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 15:50:48

God’s work: Goldman Sachs pays less than a 1 percent tax rate for 2008, while Lloyd Blankfein pulls down over $40m.

I love the quote of the Roman saying about how money is like sea water:

“The more you drink, the thirstier you become.”

May Megabank, Inc drink so much seawater that they die of thirst…

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 16:17:24

From the sounds of that story, the Chuck Schumers and Barney Franks of the world are deeply underwater — in Wall Street campaign finance dollars…

 
 
Comment by Eddie
2010-01-10 13:33:22

More signs of the recession, Honda is increasing production.

___________________________________________________________

TOKYO (Reuters) - Automaker Honda Motor Co plans to produce 3.59 million units in the world next financial year to start in April, up 6 percent from this financial year’s outlook on rising sales, Asahi newspaper reported on Saturday.

The company plans to produce 1.29 million units in North America next financial year, up 110,000 units from the current financial year, and 980,000 units in Japan, up 70,000 units, Asahi reported.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 15:41:10

Why do you keep trying to argue that the recession is continuing, when all the news that is suggests a recovery is underway?

Comment by pressboardbox
2010-01-10 15:52:59

Give it up Eddie, the recession ended last year. Duh.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 16:11:20

Isn’t it amazing how some Cassandras who post here just never give up on their stopped-clock message of gloom, no matter how strongly upbeat numbers contradict them?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-10 16:01:48

Honda made the same sort of forecast at the end of 2008. Sales were down about 20% in 2009.

They are probably doing well in Venezuela though.

Bill in LA says the stock market and gold are going up in 2010. Aren’t predictions easy?

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-01-10 17:20:18

“Bill in LA says the stock market and gold are going up in 2010.”

Can’t you substitute “predicts” for “says?” I don’t have a good track record, so I mix my precious metals and stocks with government securities. That works well for me. I hedge against my own bets and am comfortable with 57/11/32 stocks/metals/securities.

Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-10 18:08:02

Yes, Bill in LA predicts! or wagers. I have wagers too.

I do wish you good fortune, and Honda too, and me.

Predicting is hopeful, perhaps well calculated, not as Eddie seems to think; a proof.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 19:14:51

I’m with you. Saving backed by true-hedging* and diversification are king!

*I am not talking about the sort of casino gambling in which misnamed “hedge funds” engage these days…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2010-01-10 14:30:48

Anybody see After Armageddon on the History channel? I highly recommend it.

Shows and talks about what could happen to society after something like an avarian flu kills over 100 million in the U.S. Covers what will happen to food, power, society, medicine, etc…

Comment by arizonadude
2010-01-10 14:34:44

it is too depressing to watch that stuff.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 15:38:53

Also way too far fetched. Why not worry about known problems instead of worrying about imaginary ones?

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 18:49:20

Massive plagues are an historical and REPEATED fact, and WILL happen again.

100 million? Possibly exaggerated. 10 million? Easily.

Mother nature has destroyed many an empire.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 23:05:24

I repeat: Why worry about imagined or conjectured problems that might happen at some point in the indefinite future when there are so many present problems that need to be addressed?

 
Comment by Cowtown
2010-01-11 10:54:20

Erythromycin says hi. You can even get generic.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by GrizzlyBear
2010-01-10 15:07:19

Kind of late in the day for the east coasters, but anybody know anything about Forest Hill, Maryland? If so, what do you think about $495k for a 4 bedroom 3k square foot house with a 1k square foot basement on 1.5 acres? Seems rich to me, but someone dear to me has apparently just made this purchase and I’m wondering how much of a scalping they just signed up for.

Comment by neuromance
2010-01-10 18:34:04

Here’s what I found on Forest Hill, Maryland: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forest_Hill,_Maryland

You can check out homesdatabase.com, put in that zip code, and put in different price ranges to get an idea of what exists out there.

And here’s a link to the city on Google Maps

 
Comment by laurel, md
2010-01-10 19:23:51

It is commutable to Baltimore and Aberdeen Proving Ground (big BRAC gainer). Nice enough area.

 
Comment by rms
2010-01-10 21:31:57

“If so, what do you think about $495k…”

I like napkin calculations myself. A quick PITI cost of $800/mo per $100k borrowed at 6% APR means your “someone dear” must cough up roughly $3,200/mo if they put 20% ($99k) down. This is the major leagues, IMHO.

I wouldn’t co-sign their hybrid SUV loan, Griz.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 15:12:27

Decline in building has contractors tightening belts
The Daily News |January 9, 2010

New construction slowed to a crawl last year and will likely get worse, according to an industry trade group, and area contractors say they’re cutting costs and trying to survive until better times come.

“People are having to really low-ball on bidding. And this is after they’ve already cut in other ways,” said Jeff Richter, the incoming president of the Lower Columbia Contractors Association.

Nationwide, construction spending fell by $137 billion in November to hit a six-year low, according to an analysis released last week by the Associated General Contractors of America, an industry trade group.

The trade group is forecasting construction spending will fall by another 5 percent this year, said Brian Turmail, spokesman for the Arlington, Va.-based association.

“We’d love to be wrong on this, but we don’t see much reason for the construction picture to improve before the end of 2010,” Turmail said Friday.

Construction recovery won’t happen nationwide until the labor market picks up, because people need jobs before they buy houses, said Scott Bailey, regional economist for the state Employment Security Department.

The decline in building has reduced construction employment in 324 out of the 337 geographic regions the trade group surveyed nationwide recently. In the greater Longview area, jobs in construction, mining and logging sector fell by 24 percent in the 12-month period ending in November, among the highest in the state, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Comment by Lip
2010-01-10 16:23:11

I think that the construction industry could be improving in some areas “if” the financing were available. Probably not much in AZ since we overbuilt so much, but possibly in other states.

I had a contractor tell me last week that they wanted to replace some of their fleet of trucks, but they were having trouble finding the financing, thereby making it difficult to buy/lease the new ones.

Then I had a commercial mortgage broker tell me that they could “only” arrange financing for projects if the applicant already had the money in the bank.

How do you make a bank make another loan when they know they’re already facing a tsunami of defaults in the future??? Oh that’s right, you let the federal government guarantee everything. DOH!

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 18:51:35

“Construction recovery won’t happen nationwide until the labor market picks up, because people need jobs before they buy houses, said Scott Bailey, regional economist for the state Employment Security Department.”

No they don’t! That’s just crazy doom and gloom talk! The PTB have decided that our 75% consumer driven economy doesn’t need consumers! So there mister smarty pants! (damn you Olygal!)

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 15:29:30

Economy puts doctor visits on hold
enquirer.com • January 10, 2010

As the economy crashes, people skimp on a lot of things.

That dinner out might not seem quite so important. Maybe you buy the cheaper gas.
That video game for the kids for Christmas?
Maybe next year.

All of these things can be recovered when the furloughs and layoffs stop. But when people start to skimp on their health care you can feel the long-term costs adding up.

Robyn Chatman sees it. A primary-care doctor in Madisonville, she sees patients skipping appointments they need because they can’t afford it.

“I’m giving a lot more advice over the phone,” she says. “You never used to see as much of that.”

The trend shows in the numbers. U.S. spending on health care grew only 4.4 percent in 2008, the slowest increase in nearly half a century, according to Health Affairs magazine.

Out-of-pocket spending, what we all pay for premiums and co-payments and prescriptions, increased only 2.8 percent. That’s less than half the rate of the year before and has to reflect the job losses that came in waves as the economy crashed late in the year.

Yes, the numbers still are huge. Total spending on health care was $2.3 trillion, or $7,681 per person. And the slowest growth rate in 50 years still was faster than the economy as a whole.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-01-10 16:33:36

I’ve experienced this first hand with our family doctor. It used to be nearly impossible to make last minute appointments. Now its often “can you be here in 30 minutes?”

And its not just the unemployed. A growing number of the employed had insurance with large deductibles, which means that $120 office visit is coming out of their pockets, so they don’t go.

Comment by meastman
2010-01-10 21:19:53

Rationing health care in the worst way possible.

Why not ration care based on what works and doesn’t work, and on a cost benefit analysis?

 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 15:55:11

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/6962632/America-slides-deeper-into-depression-as-Wall-Street-revels.html

Real reporting from the British press: America Slides Deeper into Depression as Wall Street Revels.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 16:33:14

OMG — how can anyone (except maybe a gloomster like Eddie) argue that these numbers spell anything except for burgeoning green shoots of recovery?

The labour force contracted by 661,000 (in December 2009). This did not show up in the headline jobless rate because so many Americans dropped out of the system. The broad U6 category of unemployment rose to 17.3pc. That is the one that matters.

* US benefit claims hit 26-year peak
* US unemployment hits 26-year peak


Realtytrac says defaults and repossessions have been running at over 300,000 a month since February. One million American families lost their homes in the fourth quarter. Moody’s Economy.com expects another 2.4m homes to go this year.

…It takes heroic naivety to think the US housing market has turned the corner (apologies to Goldman Sachs, as always). The fuse has yet to detonate on the next mortgage bomb, $134bn (£83bn) of “option ARM” contracts due to reset violently upwards this year and next.

US house prices have eked out five months of gains on the Case-Shiller index, but momentum stalled in October in half the cities even before the latest surge of 40 basis points in mortgage rates. Karl Case (of the index) says prices may sink another 15pc.

David Rosenberg from Gluskin Sheff said it is remarkable how little traction has been achieved by zero rates and the greatest fiscal blitz of all time. The US economy grew at a 2.2pc rate in the third quarter (entirely due to Obama stimulus). This compares to an average of 7.3pc in the first quarter of every recovery since the Second World War.

… For the record, manufacturing capacity use at 67.2pc, and “auto-buying intentions” are the lowest ever.

The Fed’s own Monetary Multiplier crashed to an all-time low of 0.809 in mid-December. Commercial paper has shrunk by $280bn ($175bn) in since October. Bank credit has been racing down a hair-raising black run since June. It has dropped from $10.844 trillion to $9.013 trillion since November 25. The MZM money supply is contracting at a 3pc annual rate. Broad M3 money is contracting at over 5pc.

How can the shoots possibly get any greener than this?

Comment by combotechie
2010-01-10 17:56:12

“The MZM money supply is contracting at a 3pc annual rate. Broad M3 money is contracting at over 5pc.”

Which means those who have money get to call the shots, get to set terms, get to set prices.

At even a zero percent interest rate the buying power of cash - the Ultimate Financial Solution - increases in its value.

And being in debt truly sucks.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 19:11:09

Combo’s timeless stopped-clock observation:

“Pecunia est rex.” ;-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by combotechie
2010-01-10 19:30:17

“Combo’s timeless stopped clock observations.”

Just trying to hammer in the reality, for those who are slow in catching on.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 19:38:49

Combo,

I am grateful you are so persistent, as the DC economist crowd has some very, very slow learners (and I am talking about some big name academic stars here!!!). :-)

 
Comment by meastman
2010-01-10 21:22:55

Well it is combo vs FED and the vast majority of the MSM. I like to lend a hand but he provides a good foundation.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 23:02:40

“And being in debt truly sucks.”

Though I don’t agree with everything the LDS General Authorities say, I certainly do appreciate their advice on the perils of living under a mountain of debt. Too bad our Fed has slid such a long way down since the time when LDS banker Marriner Eccles was chair, when the passage quoted below was penned.

By contrast, today’s Fed leadership seems preoccupied with the task of helping Megabank, Inc create as many financial zombies (aka “debt people”) as possible.

The Responsibility for Welfare Rests with Me and My Family

Elder James E. Faust
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles

Members of the Church are also counseled to be independent. Independence means many things. It means being free of drugs that addict, habits that bind, and diseases that curse. It also means being free of personal debt and of the interest and carrying charges required by debt the world over.

President J. Reuben Clark’s classic statement on interest bears repeating:

Interest never sleeps nor sickens nor dies; it never goes to the hospital; it works on Sundays and holidays; it never takes a vacation; it never visits nor travels; it takes no pleasure; it is never laid off work nor discharged from employment; it never works on reduced hours; it never has short crops nor droughts; it never pays taxes; it buys no food; it wears no clothes; it is unhoused and without home and so has no repairs, no replacements, no shingling, plumbing, painting, or whitewashing; it has neither wife, children, father, mother, nor kinfolk to watch over and care for; it has no expense of living; it has neither weddings nor births nor deaths; it has no love, no sympathy; it is as hard and soulless as a granite cliff.

Once in debt, interest is your companion every minute of the day and night; you cannot shun it or slip away from it; you cannot dismiss it; it yields neither to entreaties, demands, or orders; and whenever you get in its way or cross its course or fail to meet its demands, it crushes you.” (in Conference Report, Apr., 1938, p. 103.)

Extended economic dependence humiliates a man if he is strong, and debilitates him if he is weak.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 18:17:15

Maybe those 17% who are unemployed can boil those abundant green shoots and make soup to live on!

Never let it be said that Sammy doesn’t have a heart.

 
Comment by combotechie
2010-01-10 18:28:28

“The Fed’s own Monetary Multiplier crashed to an all-time low of 0.809 in mid-December.”

Which means that banks are REDUCING the supply of money rather than INCREASING the supply of money as they do in normal times.

Money that enters a banks stays in the bank instead of being recycled back into the world.

This money that stays int the bank is being taken out of circulation. Taking money out of circulation makes money scarce. Scarity of money increases its value which increases its buying power.

It’s really that simple.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 19:12:51

Whatever goes under the bank’s matress, stays under the bank’s matress, until falling-knife collateral risk is alleviated by a bottoming of asset prices to reflect post-bubble economic reality.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 19:55:27

‘David Rosenberg from Gluskin Sheff said it is remarkable how little traction has been achieved by zero rates and the greatest fiscal blitz of all time. The US economy grew at a 2.2pc rate in the third quarter (entirely due to Obama stimulus). This compares to an average of 7.3pc in the first quarter of every recovery since the Second World War.

Fed hawks are playing with fire by talking up about exit strategies, not for the first time. This is what they did in June 2008. We know what happened three months later. For the record, manufacturing capacity use at 67.2pc, and “auto-buying intentions” are the lowest ever.’

Does anyone else smell the raw material for the largest dead cat bounce on record in those observations?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 16:05:43

United States

The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission
That 1930s show

Jan 7th 2010 | WASHINGTON, DC
From The Economist print edition
A Depression-era crusade against Wall Street has a 2010 revival

Getty Images Pecora in his pomp

THE battle against the financial crisis may be ending, but the war over why it happened has barely begun. The most ambitious effort yet to settle the story begins next week with the first hearing of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.

Congress gave the ten-member bipartisan commission a sprawling mandate: to investigate at least 22 potential causes, from excess global savings to short-selling, and to explain why specific firms collapsed or needed bail-outs. The report, due by December 15th, is not supposed to contain recommendations but probably will.

Though modelled on the body that investigated the attacks of September 11th 2001, the spiritual father of this venture is the Pecora Commission. This was named after Ferdinand Pecora, the chief lawyer on the Senate Banking Committee from 1933 to 1934. His cross-examinations brought forth revelations of widespread abuses on Wall Street: bankers selling stocks at preferred prices to powerful friends, or giving executives bonuses for dumping dud securities on the public. Within days of testifying, the head of National City Bank, the predecessor of Citibank, was forced to resign. The commission’s findings led to the creation of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the passage of the Glass-Steagall Act, which separated commercial and investment banking.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-10 19:11:18

Oh my. A fearsome and awe inspiring… circle j (er, uh, um)

 
Comment by neuromance
2010-01-10 19:22:49

Tim Geithner’s chief of staff is a former Goldman Sachs lobbyist. He successfully lobbied against a bill limiting CEO compensation, authored by Barack Obama, back in like 2004-2005.

Point being - While I hope this is like the 9/11 commission, my concern is that it will be heavily influenced by financial industry lobbying, due to subtle issues like the above.

 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 16:14:41

From the Telegraph article above:

The home foreclosure guillotine usually drops a year or so after people lose their job, and exhaust their savings. The local sheriff will escort them out of the door, often with some sympathy –– just like the police in 1932, mostly Irish Catholics who tithed 1pc of their pay for soup kitchens.

Realtytrac says defaults and repossessions have been running at over 300,000 a month since February. One million American families lost their homes in the fourth quarter. Moody’s Economy.com expects another 2.4m homes to go this year. Taken together, this looks awfully like Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath.

Judges are finding ways to block evictions. One magistrate in Minnesota halted a case calling the creditor “harsh, repugnant, shocking and repulsive”. We are not far from a de facto moratorium in some areas.

This is how it ended between 1932 and 1934, when half the US states declared moratoria or “Farm Holidays”. Such flexibility innoculated America’s democracy against the appeal of Red Unions and Coughlin Fascists. The home siezures are occurring despite frantic efforts by the Obama administration to delay the process.

This policy is entirely justified given the scale of the social crisis. But it also masks the continued rot in the housing market, allows lenders to hide losses, and stores up an ever larger overhang of unsold properties. It takes heroic naivety to think the US housing market has turned the corner (apologies to Goldman Sachs, as always). The fuse has yet to detonate on the next mortgage bomb, $134bn (£83bn) of “option ARM” contracts due to reset violently upwards this year and next.

US house prices have eked out five months of gains on the Case-Shiller index, but momentum stalled in October in half the cities even before the latest surge of 40 basis points in mortgage rates. Karl Case (of the index) says prices may sink another 15pc. “If the 2008 and 2009 loans go bad, then we’re back where we were before – in a nightmare.”

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 16:34:43

So in summary, what Evans-Pritchard is really saying is that a strong recovery is underway, right?

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-10 18:06:55

Exactly. Let’s all go out and buy an SUV and MacMansion, then max out our credit cards. Let the good times roll.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-01-10 21:05:04

Sounds like he’s saying that the Fed needs to keep interest rates near zero, and that the gov is right to try to slow the foreclosure epidemic.

 
 
 
Comment by Muggy
2010-01-10 16:26:24

My father-in-law says it’s a good time to rent. If you knew my FIL, you’d know this might be the mother of all buy signals… Lol.

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2010-01-10 16:45:20

Maybe he’s hoping you will do the exact opposite of what he is saying.

 
Comment by cougar91
2010-01-10 16:54:40

Shouldn’t that be the father of all buy signals? :-)

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-10 17:44:43

Dubai’s First Foreclosure May Open Floodgates in Worst Market

Jan. 11 (Bloomberg) — Dubai’s housing rout sent prices down 52 percent in the past year, prompting some homeowners to abandon their cars and mortgage payments and flee the country. Not one received a foreclosure notice.

Until now.

Barclays Plc won the sheikdom’s first foreclosure cases in court, clearing the way for lenders holding about $16 billion of Dubai home loans to take action when borrowers don’t pay. Islamic lender Tamweel PJSC, the emirate’s biggest mortgage bank, has several of its own foreclosure claims pending and estimates about 3 percent of its mortgages are in default.

“Banks will be more aggressive in pursuing legal action if they see the process is efficient,” said Antoine Yacoub, a banking analyst at Moody’s Investors Service Inc. “They were trying to avoid the courts and restructure most of their loans, but once they see a precedent has been set, they will be encouraged to push more cases through.”

The successful foreclosures by Barclays may open the floodgates in Dubai’s property market, which went from the world’s best in 2008 to the worst after credit dried up and speculators who had fueled price increases left the market, according to Deutsche Bank AG. Moody’s estimated in September that 12 percent of the 27,000 residential mortgages in the sheikdom would default within 12 to 18 months.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 19:33:40

“Dubai’s housing rout sent prices down 52 percent in the past year, prompting some homeowners to abandon their cars and mortgage payments and flee the country. Not one received a foreclosure notice.”

With a slight rewording, this article could fit California quite well.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 19:35:08

“Moody’s estimated in September that 12 percent of the 27,000 residential mortgages in the sheikdom would default within 12 to 18 months.”

Isn’t this unduly pessimistic? I don’t see why Dubai can’t impose a foreclosure moratorium, similar to those which have been used to forestall California foreclosures.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 19:36:42

Perhaps it gets down to the differences between Islamic and Western banking rules? For example, in contrast to the Western banking system, perhaps Islamic banking subjects borrowers and lenders to a rule of law.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 23:15:23

Every dark financial crisis has a silver lining.

* JANUARY 11, 2010

Devaluation Sparks Chaos in Caracas

By JOHN LYONS and DARCY CROWE

CARACAS — President Hugo Chávez’s decision to devalue Venezuela’s bolivar and impose a complicated new currency regime may paper over some growing cracks in the economy, but it is also setting the stage for bigger problems down the road for the country’s oil-rich nation and its populist leader.

Over the weekend, there were signs that Mr. Chávez’s slashing of the “strong bolivar” currency could create as many problems as it solves in Venezuela’s economy, provoking a wave of anxiety that sent Venezuelans scurrying to spend cash they feared could soon be worthless.

At Caracas’s middle-class Sambil shopping mall, lines at cashiers reached 50-deep. Carmen Blanco, a 28-year-old accountant, waited to buy a 42-inch flat-screen television she doesn’t need because she already has one at home.

“It doesn’t make any sense to keep my savings,” Ms. Blanco said Saturday. “I’d love to see how things work in a normal country.”

On Sunday, Mr. Chávez vowed to fight speculation and price increases that could result from the devaluation, which raises the price of imports.

Harried by recession and sliding popularity, Mr. Chávez on Friday weakened the bolivar to 4.3 per dollar from 2.15 in a bid to shore up government finances, which have been hit by weaker oil prices, and to stimulate economic growth ahead of key elections.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 23:17:53

Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more: it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.

* MANAGEMENT
* JANUARY 11, 2010

Banks Brace for Bonus Fury

BY SUSANNE CRAIG, DAVID ENRICH AND ROBIN SIDEL

Critics of Wall Street firms are grumbling that this year’s bonuses are far too generous. But some recipients are none too happy, either: They’re complaining too much of the payout is coming in stock instead of cash.

Banks and securities firms have told workers their bonuses will contain a bigger percentage of stock to demonstrate that Wall Street is sensitive to public anger over the big paychecks. The idea is that stock reduces employees’ temptation to take too many financial risks, since they have an ownership stake.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 23:26:20

* OPINION
* JANUARY 10, 2010, 7:08 P.M. ET

The Fed and the Crisis: A Reply to Ben Bernanke
In his recent speech, the Fed chairman denied that too-low interest rates were responsible. Does this mean we’re headed for a new boom-bust cycle?

By JOHN B. TAYLOR

Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke spent most of his speech to the American Economic Association on Jan. 3 responding to the critique that easy monetary policy during 2002-2005 contributed to the housing boom, to excessive risk taking, and thereby to the financial crisis.

Mr. Bernanke claimed that “Economists who have investigated the issue have generally found that, based on historical relationships, only a small portion of the increase in house prices earlier this decade can be attributed to the stance of U.S. monetary policy.” But two of the economists he cites—Frank Smets, director of research at the European Central Bank, and his colleague Marek Jarocinski—reported in the July/August issue of the St. Louis Fed Review that “evidence that monetary policy has significant effects on housing investment and house prices and that easy monetary policy designed to stave off perceived risks of deflation in 2002-04 has contributed to the boom in the housing market in 2004 and 2005.”

These technical arguments are important, but one should not lose sight of the forest through the trees. You do not have to rely on the Taylor rule to see that monetary policy was too loose. The real interest rate during this period was persistently less than zero, thereby subsidizing borrowers. Thomas Hoenig, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, reported in a speech on Jan. 7 that during the past decade “real interest rates—the nominal interest rate adjusted for inflation—remained at negative levels for approximately 40 percent of the time. The last time this occurred was during the 1970s, preceding a time of turbulence.

Inflation was increasing, even excluding skyrocketing housing prices. Yet even when inflation is low, the damage of boom-bust monetary policy can be severe as Milton Friedman stressed in his strong criticism of the Fed in the 1950s and 1960s. Stepping back from the fray, an objective observer of all this evidence would have to at least admit the possibility that monetary policy was too easy and a possible contributor to the crisis.

Not admitting the possibility raises concerns. One is that if such a large deviation from standard policy is rationalized away, it might happen again. Indeed, some analysts are worried now about the Fed holding interest rates too low for too long, causing another boom-bust and a shorter expansion.

Another concern is that, rather than trying to be vigilant and avoid causing bubbles, the Fed will try to burst them with interest rates. Indeed, one of the lines from Mr. Bernanke’s speech most picked up by Fed watchers is that “we must remain open to using monetary policy as a supplementary tool for addressing those risks.” We have very limited ability to fine tune monetary policy in such an interventionist way.

Finally, there is a concern that the line of analysis in Mr. Bernanke’s speech puts the full burden of preventing future bubbles on new regulation. Clearly the Fed missed excessive risks on and off the balance sheets of the banks that it supervises and regulates. That policy needs to be corrected. However, it is wishful thinking that some new and untried macro-prudential systemic risk regulation will prevent bubbles.

While I disagree with Mr. Bernanke’s analysis, it is good news that the Federal Reserve Board has begun to examine its policies and publish its findings. This will help inform the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, which will soon begin holding public hearings on the causes of the financial and economic crisis. In the meantime I hope the Federal Reserve Board will continue with this new self-examination policy and transparently evaluate all its recent crisis-related actions, from the AIG bailout to the Mortgage Backed Security purchase program.

Mr. Taylor is professor of economics at Stanford University and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 23:37:51

Why can’t Draghi point out the obvious remedy to the fragile banking system: Chop up the too-big-to-fail megabanks into systemically safe bits that don’t threaten to bring down the entire global economy if one of them fails? If enough top bankers started saying this, perhaps a quorum would develop to stand behind action to fix the too-big-to-fail systemic risk problem for good. Dismembering TBTF banks (and the free government insurance which protects them from their own destructive behaviors) would also go a long way to eliminating paychecks that encourage dangerous speculation, as bankers would have to fund their bonus payments out of the profitability of their own operations, rather than being able to charge off massive bonus payments to TBTF claims payments extracted through currency dilution.

It would also be nice if this generation of bankers could leave behind a clear warning to subsequent generations to avoid the moral hazard problem that comes with free too-big-to-fail bailout insurance. We should do this for the children, and for the children’s children, and for all future generations. TOO-BIG-TO-FAIL IS A RECIPE FOR SYSTEMIC FAILURE!!!

* BUSINESS
* JANUARY 11, 2010

Banks Warned Against Complacency

FSB Head Urges Tough Capital Requirements; ‘Substantial Fragilities’ Remain

By NINA KOEPPEN

BASEL, Switzerland—The head of the Financial Stability Board warned banks against complacency and backed recent proposals that would toughen capital requirements as part of a global banking industry overhaul.

Mario Draghi, chairman of the FSB and governor of the Bank of Italy, said banks ran the risk of of overrating the strength of the economic recovery and recklessly returning to dangerous old habits even as “substantial fragilities” remained in the system.

“The general situation is much better than we could have expected a year ago but, at the same time, it is not as good as the market thinks it is,” Mr. Draghi said at a news briefing Saturday night after the group’s biannual plenary meeting.

Moreover, he added, banks must pay more attention to compensation practices with an aim toward ensuring that pay policies don’t encourage dangerous speculation. Those comments come as banks prepare to announce large bonuses for staff following a year of surprisingly strong performance.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-10 23:42:51

” Let them eat cake, while we laugh our f-ing azzes off.”

* PAGE ONE
* JANUARY 11, 2010

Wall Street’s Latest Derivative: Goldman Parodies
Exclusive Club Sends Up a Mighty Bank With Lampoons of Old Tunes

By ROBERT FRANK and DENNIS K. BERMAN

“How do you solve a problem like Lloyd Blankfein?

How do you cap a bonus and keep it down?

How do you find a way to say

I’m sorry, excusez-moi, je suis désolé, pardon?”
[drawing kappa beta phi symbol]

So sang Evercore Partners Inc. banker Jane Gladstone, dressed in a nun’s habit, at an annual roast of Wall Street’s elite Thursday night. In a take-off on the Sound of Music tune “How Do You Solve a Problem Like Maria?” she was sending up Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and its chief executive, Mr. Blankfein.

He and Goldman took the brunt of the jokes at the 78th induction ceremony for Kappa Beta Phi, a secretive and exclusive Wall Street fraternity.

More than 175 people gathered to induct new members in a ceremony that’s a throwback to a chummy world long before television and the Internet.

The group dressed up in drag, sang satiric songs and threw dinner rolls at the new members — known as “Neophytes” — at a ballroom of Manhattan’s St. Regis Hotel.

With Goldman’s bonus and compensation pool slated to surpass $20 billion this year, the bank has become a subject of wide public attention and criticism, even among its peers.

Ms. Gladstone’s parody, “How Do You Solve a Problem Like Lloyd Blankfein?” captured the investment bank’s current image problems and was described by many attendees as the evening’s highlight.

“He trades metal from the mines.

He’d steal swine flu from the swines

Unless that rare vaccine goes to the schools.

He is little, he is bald,

His plane’s late when Obama calls.

He’s a headache, he’s a handful, he’s a squid.”

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post