January 12, 2010

Bits Bucket For January 12, 2010

Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here. Please visit the HBB Forum.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

382 Comments »

Comment by LA Wallflower
2010-01-12 01:48:42

Sam’s Club closing 10 stores:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2010/01/sams-club-to-shutter-10-stores-including-four-in-california.html

From the article:

“Spokeswoman Susan Koehler said the stores are scheduled to close Jan. 22. She said she didn’t know why so many California locations were affected.

“It’s not related to the economy,” she said. “It’s just unfortunate poor financial performance throughout the years.””

Hmm, here’s a hint, Susan. Sacramento, Orange County, Palm Springs, Oceanside (San Diego suburb), Phoenix, Houston. All places where the real estate market has cratered, people have lost jobs and nobody can cash out equity anymore to fill a giant house with mega-quantity consumer goods.

Could be worth looking at, huh? :D

Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-01-12 10:28:18

“It’s not related to the economy,” she said. “It’s just unfortunate poor financial performance throughout the years”

I love that. The economy is not related to poor financial performance. No, no - not at all! Nope - the hobgoblins told them to close down these stores, or maybe it was something else, but it couldn’t possibly be caused by a lousy economy triggered by a collapsing Housing Bubble! Right…

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 13:48:07

“It’s not related to the economy,” she said. “It’s just unfortunate poor financial performance throughout the years.””

And the trees waving make the wind blow. This spokeswoman seems destined for a senior economic policy post in the Obama Cabinet.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 15:16:36

Sam’s Club is a division of Wal Mart.

You know times are hard when Wal Mart has to close stores.

 
 
Comment by stpn2me
2010-01-12 03:00:32

Good early morning guys!

Been looking at houses in the Winston Salem Area of N.C. Not too many for sale signs out in the upper price limits $400k and up. Visited a new development where they said they had no HOA. That was refreshing. In the lower price ranges, I am seeing ALOT of for rent signs. Not as many for sale signs. But I still say there’s not nearly as many jobs in this area to support inflated values. There is about the same for open, raw land here, especially between Sanford and Siler City..

Man, only a few more days of leave left!

Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-01-12 04:47:08

Good morning Stpn.

We’ve had a dribble of new inventory coming on in our town although other towns have had a lot more. I would say most of the new inventory around here is in the lower price range and I’d imagine more tied to job loss. Or perhaps landlords are trying to dump inventory they’re starting to realize they bought too high.

Enjoy your leave and as always stay safe upon your return.

 
Comment by oxide
2010-01-12 05:26:32

Good morning! I see little reason for any house to cost that much in the entire state. If you really like a house that’s For Rent, you can always ask if it’s for sale. You may hit jackpot with a desperate FB who would agree to a short sale.

When do you plan on making this purchase?

Comment by Ol'Bubba
2010-01-12 07:36:38

Here’s a piece from today’s Charlotte Observer:

www dot charlotteobserver dot com/business/story/1175163 dot html

“Elizabeth Langston (left) looks back at a Ballantyne house after touring it Monday with Realtor Melanie Bona of Helen Adams Realty. The house, last sold for $1.15 million, is on the market for less than $900,000, a sign of pricing pressures, especially at the high end. ”

“I keep seeing these fabulous deals coming up so I feel like, wow, I need to get out there and take advantage of these deals,” said the mother of three. “I absolutely love my house, but it’s just such an incredible time to buy. If there weren’t such bargains, we wouldn’t be looking.”

Langston, whose husband is a Wells Fargo banker, doubts they’d have much trouble selling their South Charlotte home although they might take a slight “hair cut” on the price. That, she said, would be more than offset by the bargain she hopes to find.

Bona, who specializes in short sales, took Langston to see one Monday afternoon. The six-bedroom house, overlooking the golf course in the Ballantyne Country Club community, sold in 2004 for $1.15 million, according to Mecklenburg County records. The current asking price is $899,950.

Comment by pressboardbox
2010-01-12 08:00:03

Prime example of what is wrong with government price-fixing paradox. Her husband works for WF which means his job WAS with Wachiovia, a bank that went completely bankrupt but was saved by the Paulson bailout. He should have lost his job when his bank went down. Instead, look what he (his wife) is out there doing?? Greed stinks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2010-01-12 08:32:56

huh?
Your post fails to make a sound argument. All I see are non-sequiters and a host of fallacies. What is your point?

 
Comment by pressboardbox
2010-01-12 08:43:02

Guy is willing to sell humongous house he paid too much for to buy an even more ridiculous piece of property just for the sake of greed while trying to obtain more “show-off” value. Meanwhile this guy should be unemployed like so many who are suffering but his employer was “saved” by the government thus allowing his wife to specuvest which is the root of the whole problem and the entire point of this blog.

 
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2010-01-12 09:52:53

I thought the entire point of this blog was to apply critical thinking in a civil forum.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but no one is entitled to their own facts. It appears to me that you are using your own opinions as facts here, pressboardbox.

Did you read the article? When you state “just for the sake of greed while trying to obtain more “show-off” value” you are presenting your opinion as a fact. Your anger shines through when you state “meanwhile this guy should be unemployed…” Did it ever occur to you that jobs still need to be done even when an organization goes belly-up? Just because Wells Fargo bought Wachovia that doesn’t mean every Wachovia employee gets a pink slip. You don’t know who he is or what he does, yet you state he should be unemployed. That’s mighty harsh.

I initially posted the link to illustrate that there are still high end houses in the NC market in response to oxide’s comment.

The price reductions occurring are part of the process of price discovery in markets, especially in the high end of the market for move up buyers. A 22% reduction from a 2004 seems to me more like a sign of a correction than “a price-fixing paradox”.

You may opine that the prices have further to fall, but the market is the sum of all participants. As prices fall on the upper end houses, they become more attractive to move up buyers. Some people (most people?) want to live in a better house, and a better house is a matter of taste.

Please proof read what you write before you post it. You’ll earn more credibility.

 
Comment by pressboardbox
2010-01-12 10:10:45

Bubba, I had no idea you work for a failed bank. I am sorry.

 
Comment by pressboardbox
2010-01-12 10:26:08

I don’t need credibility, I’m cool with having none.

 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2010-01-12 10:40:14

That was a one heartfelt apology ;)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 10:55:19

“I don’t need credibility, I’m cool with having none.”

Credibility is the enemy of unvarnished facts.

 
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2010-01-12 10:56:31

I’ll try this again-

I thought the entire point of this blog was to apply critical thinking in a civil forum. Are you having a bad day, pressboardbox?

I’m currently unemployed, and I have never worked for a failed bank.

There is one thing we can both agree on, pressboardbox. You are sorry.

 
Comment by oxide
2010-01-12 11:16:15

We have a whiny wife looking at million-dollar houses. That’s an indication that the Wells Fargo husband has a couple rungs under him on the ladder. We don’t know for sure, but it’s enough evidence that pressboard’s frustration isn’t completely baseless.

However, that does not automatically mean Wells Fargo husband was one who made the lousy decisions which contributed to the bank crisis, or whether he deserves a pink slip. Maybe it’s the wife who deserves a pink slip.

Anyway, not only are there $400K homes, but million dollar homes, in NC? Why? Did they run out of land? Six bedrooms not enough? Private tennis court? Trying to copy Biltmore?

 
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-01-12 13:49:20

Why in the heck should a guy in middle management at a bank make $300,000, which he should be making if he’s considering buying a $900,000 house. I’m with pressboard - bankers don’t create wealth, they just steal it.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 13:52:03

I thought the entire point of this blog was to apply critical thinking in a civil forum.

Not really. Sometimes throwing around gratuitous insults and mocking the flawed reasoning of others is far more entertaining than making an actual point.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 13:57:10

Any wise banker would be hunkering down and waiting to see how hard the winds of change are going to buffet his industry, and whether his own position will be in jeopardy. I’m guessing that a middle manager at Wells Fargo is far more aware than most of how many non-performing loans they’re sitting on. Of course, he may assume endless gub’mint bailouts await, which for this Administration is probably a valid assumption. His wife, I suspect, is one of those society harpies desperate to climb the social ladder and equating a gaudy house with success, even if you take on a mountain of debt to “own” it. This is going to end badly.

 
Comment by SUGuy
2010-01-12 19:14:30

I have come to the conclusion that in life you can not figure people out. You will only drive yourself crazy trying to analysis why people do what they do.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2010-01-12 03:20:43

Hidden Key To Last Decade’s Disasters: Dubya’s Commitment To “Diversity”

by Steve Sailer>

*Bush had Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta eradicate the airport security ethnic profiling system before 9/11. (Then he reappointed Mineta, a Democrat, for his second term!).

**Bush repeatedly signaled the mortgage industry in 2002-2004 that zero down payment home purchases would be A-OK with his federal regulators.

Of course, those are by no means the only causes of the subsequent disasters. But shouldn’t we at least talk about them?…

I’m no fan of vdare.com, or conflating terrorists with CRA borrowers…but it is fair to talk about a subject that isn’t going away soon and should be debated in the open, without the albatross of political correctness.

Is saying that someone “looks” like a terrorist as legitimate as saying that someone “looks” like they can’t pay their mortgage? It provides great cover for those who think the world is less complicated than it is. Profiling may have caught many Arab terrorists, but would it have caught a John Walker Lindh, Robert Reid or Jose Padilla? If al-Qaeda knows obvious Muslims are being profiled, wouldn’t they just send non-Arab white, black, Hispanic, or Asian radical Muslims?

Similarly, “redlining” by banks may reduce the risk of default, but provides cover for ethnic purists who can’t be objective. There have been studies showing that for the same income and FICO, there is still substantial racial disparity in who gets a good mortgage rate or even any mortgage at all. Then there are those lovely people who feel it is their job to maintain “ethnic purity” in certain neighborhoods.

The call for Muslims to do a better job of policing their own for extremists is legitimate if they want to avoid the indignities of profiling: Turn in your brother if he’s a terrorist. Similarly, social conservatives need to do the same thing: Police your own and stop providing cover for bigots whose agenda exceeds the mandate of airline safety or reasonable credit risks, and quit providing breaks for your own by way of nepotism (i.e. the Old Boys club).

Whatever you think America stands for…be fair. Those of us who live in the real world know that it isn’t easy to separate the good guys from the bad guys, and that the bad guys will always take advantage of any opening you give them, including exploiting your own prejudices (or perceived lack thereof).

Comment by aNYCdj
2010-01-12 12:03:33

Hey shouldn’t we demand Jackson and Sharpton and the Naacp to do this first in their own communities? If we have no guts to demand this from them, then why should we demand this of muslims?

Fair is Fair!
———————————————————
The call for Muslims to do a better job of policing their own for extremists is legitimate if they want to avoid the indignities of profiling: Turn in your brother if he’s a terrorist.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 15:24:47

Bill Cosby has done and continues to do just that.

Comment by aNYCdj
2010-01-12 15:58:30

Yup…..the Lone sane voice on race issues.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Dale
2010-01-12 19:54:31

Also Larry Elder….but they cancelled his radio show.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 03:57:04

Commodity-Cost Jump Threatens to Stifle Rebound ~~ WSJ

From corn to crude, prices for a wide range of commodities are on the rise across the globe, a trend that underscores — but could also hinder — a gathering economic recovery.

In recent months, global food prices have been growing at a rate that rivals some of the wildest months of 2008, when food riots erupted across the developing world. Higher prices could be a positive sign that companies are gearing up for a rebound in consumer spending, or the harbinger of a return to the upward spiral that plagued consumers before the recession took hold.

The surge in commodities “is a reflection of extremely strong demand in the emerging world, and growing hopes of stronger demand in the developed world,” said Jim O’Neill, head of global economic research at Goldman Sachs in London. It is “encouraging so long as it isn’t too persistent.”

But Hugh Grant, chairman and chief executive of St. Louis crop-biotechnology company Monsanto Co., said the recession merely “masked” the 2008 food crisis.

Comment by jess
2010-01-12 07:05:12

Lots of things may be going up , but some things are still a good deal.We’ve used up our winter wood supply for our backup wood stove . We checked around our local ”$50.00 a pickup load ” Good ole boys , and they’re all out , or too cold to bring any .
We struck paydirt when we called our local trucking company , that usually hauls gravel, sand , rock etc. to the now dead , and mostly frozen construction industry.
The owner , obviously a go-getter , says ”Sure ,we’ll cut & split a load for you this morning . I’ve got a dozen drivers here doing nothing , and we have access to a lot of dry trees ”
Within 6 hrs we have a medium size dump-truck load of nice just split up firewood .(about 5 pickup loads) . The cost a very nominal $160.00 .

Comment by drumminj
2010-01-12 08:03:01

Within 6 hrs we have a medium size dump-truck load of nice just split up firewoo

Don’t you want seasoned wood, though?

I’ve never relied on it as a heat source, but my (limited) understanding is you’d want to make sure you have the correct species, as well as properly seasoned so it will burn well. You get good wood from the trucking company?

Comment by Al
2010-01-12 09:30:22

“…as well as properly seasoned so it will burn well. ”

To add, if it doesn’t burn well it leaves a build up in the chimney which leads to chimney fires.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2010-01-12 10:46:27

“dry trees”==seasoned. They can season before or after they are split, though they’re way easier to split when wet, unless you have a hydraulic power-splitter.

Almost any species (hard or soft) is fine; the difference is how many BTUs they generate before they are burned up. Hardwoods produce way more before you have to reload (roughly twice as much, IIRC).

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-01-12 11:44:59

Interesting fact about wood.. By weight, they all produce the same amount of BTUs when burned.

One ton of balsa or Alder produces the same amount of heat as one ton of oak.

Differences come from things like sap and oil content.. and of course density. A ton of balsa will fill up the back yard but a ton of oak takes up little space.

As different as they might be, their heat value is derived from their common cell structure.. cellulose.. lignin, and a pound of cellulose is a pound of cellulose.

You get 8600 BTU per pound if bone dry. Seasoned to 20% water content delivers about 6,400 BTU per pound.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 16:56:13

“Interesting fact about wood.. By weight, they all produce the same amount of BTUs when burned.”

Does it matter whether the wood is part of a SFR or a condo?

 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-01-12 20:16:59

..Does it matter whether the wood is part of a SFR or a condo?..

Now yer just trying to be sneaky.. asking the wrong questions and confusing the issue.. just like the guys that sell firewood by volume (a “cord”) instead of by weight.

 
 
 
Comment by pressboardbox
2010-01-12 08:04:04

I get my fire wood from China where I get every other thing I need. You can barely smell any toxic fumes when you burn it.

Comment by oxide
2010-01-12 11:30:05

Sounds like you buy a lot of stuff at IKEA. :razz:

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by aNYCdj
2010-01-12 12:08:06

Don’t knock Ikea…there is so much FREE ikea stuff on craigslist its mind boggling sometimes….and still some people expect you to pay for used ikea…what fools

 
 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-01-12 12:49:13

If you were in eastern PA, I could direct you to some free firewood. Seems that the guy across the street from my parents had to cut down some trees. And then he just left ‘em there.

While I was visiting I put a “free firewood” sign on one pile, and it disappeared in a week. According to Mom, more of the cut wood needs to find better homes than in Mr. Leave It There’s yard.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 13:59:42

Good deal. I’m thinking the barter economy is going to make a big comeback.

Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-01-12 14:03:30

It already is.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2010-01-12 14:49:12

The barter company is here, alive and doing quite well.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by cactus
2010-01-12 09:30:44

I should check out the ETF DBA

As the dollar falls its going to cost more to compete with the rising economies of the thrid world.

No matter what Ben Bernake said about a weak dollar not affecting the average American he was of course just lying.

Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-01-12 10:36:56

That is the goal: for us to “compete” with the 3rd world by having 3rd world lifestyles: shacks, 1 bowl of rice a day, open sewers flowing down the street, playing in trash, etc.

Destroying the dollar is a key part of this plan.

Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-01-12 20:35:22

Goal schmole. Laying this off on the PTB is a bunch of crap. They do only what we allow them to do.

We are irresistibly competitive when we want to be.. We could crush every other economy in the world if we wanted to, and all on our terms.

But we’ve grown fat and utterly lazy.. we want it all to come easy. We don’t want to strain ourselves. These days, when we see competition, instead of it being an invitation to kick some ass, we loathe the thought of having to get back to work.
And the PTB, being our servants, just go with the flow.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 03:58:24

U.S. automakers rev up lobbying.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. automakers will again benefit from government programs in 2010 despite bailout fatigue and uncertain prospects for some of the industry’s legislative priorities on trade and energy.

Congress faces a mid-term elections this year with the Obama administration and majority Democrats on shaky ground with voters over the economy.

Against that backdrop, policymakers and lawmakers expect the auto industry to play a critical role in their efforts to boost manufacturing and create jobs, especially in states like Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana that are coveted politically and are struggling with high unemployment.

“We know as this industry comes back, the economy will come back, jobs will come back,” Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said on Monday at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit where industry lobbying kicked into high gear.

Comment by SDGreg
2010-01-12 06:49:05

“We know as this industry comes back, the economy will come back, jobs will come back,” Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said on Monday at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit where industry lobbying kicked into high gear.

The auto industry can only “come back” if we shovel more public money down that rat hole. Why are we plowing more money into a dying industry instead of investing in areas that might have a future, things like nanotechnology, alternative energy, etc.?

Comment by james
2010-01-12 08:28:21

Not sure alternative energy has much a future either. If the global warming boogyman goes away, and it should, then we are not resource constrained for energy with coal and natural gas.

Nanotech. Not sure what people mean by this anymore. We have a bunch of it already. Anyhow, electronics keep getting better.

Stem cell developments and other biotechnology give me a lot of hope for the future as well.

For automotive: if people aren’t going into massive debt with HELOCs to buy SUVs then any recovery will be modest. Not to mention if people make economical choices.

Also have to remember that D party is always divided on things. On the one hand you have enviromentalists trying to conserve resources and drive forward with rail and public transit. Unfortunatly most of their core support comes from union members that aren’t served by people not using their vehicles. Hence, ineffective action at best. See Amtrack.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2010-01-12 08:37:07

“Unfortunatly most of their core support comes from union members that aren’t served by people not using their vehicles. Hence, ineffective action at best. See Amtrack.”

Thank you for making that point. To which I would like to add that buying a bicycle or a transit pass doesn’t require dealing with the banker men the way a car purchase does - another reason for the lack of support.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-01-12 12:52:24

Thank you for making that point. To which I would like to add that buying a bicycle or a transit pass doesn’t require dealing with the banker men the way a car purchase does - another reason for the lack of support.

Sorry to break the news to ya, but I have seen financing options at the bike shops here in Tucson. Mind you, they’re for the expensive rides that are prevalent in the big “gotta be seen there” events like El Tour de Tucson.

Which means that the basic transportation bikes are still affordable. Thank goodness.

 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2010-01-12 08:44:46

Kia. Hyundai and the Chicoms are going to be the big winners in the US automotive market. I see American, Japanese and European dealers full of expensive cars and trucks that J6P can’t afford. You want a $40,000 Truck/SUV? That’ll be $800 per month Mr. Howmuchamonth. What? You can’t afford that? Let me show you our new line of Chinese compact cars and pickup trucks, starting at 8K.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by cactus
2010-01-12 09:34:54

Let me show you our new line of Chinese compact cars and pickup trucks, starting at 8K.

I wonder how much toxic waste is built into Chinese cars and trucks ?

 
Comment by In Colorado
2010-01-12 12:23:52

Probably plenty, but that’s all J6P can afford now.

 
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-01-12 13:54:11

I would not buy a Chinese car,even for $8K brand-new.

 
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2010-01-12 16:49:20

“I would not buy a Chinese car,even for $8K brand-new.”

Why in the world not? I mean, society did survive the Pinto. :D

(At least most of us.)

 
 
Comment by oxide
2010-01-12 09:00:32

If the global warming boogyman goes away, and it should, then we are not resource constrained for energy with coal and natural gas.

We have oil and gas now, yes. But a renewables economy takes decades to research optimize and phase in — you can’t just flip it on the day after the oil runs out.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-12 10:00:47

Conservation is the best investment.

 
Comment by james
2010-01-12 10:08:18

Oxide,

I realize we need renewables eventually. Thing is that day is pretty far off.

Like 70-80 years.

We should keep working at it though. For me, improved efficiency and technology advances are key. I don’t think we are ready yet and shouldn’t try to force technology that isn’t ready.

Take a look at lighting as an example: You go from oils, to arclighting to incandescant to florescent to LEDs. Not sure what the efficiency increases is in total but incandescent to LED is about 90%. I’m still not sure that even more efficiency isn’t available to get beyond that point to 94-95% ( LEDs are running at 50% e-o now).

Similar with solar technology. More elaborate semiconductors are being developed that capture much more of the suns energy. That combined with gathering systems (the peak efficiency happens at a higher energy density than normally occurs so you use concentrator mirrors) and dropping production costs.

So with a moderate amount of government support and investment along with some incentives keeps us from going in too early and having a bunch of crappy infastructure we just don’t need. That vs forcing it.

For the immediate time frame I’d love to see us conserve resources and floated plenty of ideas for achiving that.

Some of my more or less silly proposals.

1) Increase the gas tax by 1$ per gallon.
2) Two tier gas tax with cards issued to pay for the gas. First 500 gallons per person is at one rate. After that an additional 0.5$ per gallon. Families get additional breaks because they have more people and get more fuel.
3) tax break for moving closer to work. Like to see the IRS tax rules changed so you can write off any move that gets you closer to your place of work.
4) Additonal tax break for under use of gas beyond the 500 gallons.
5) Tax break for companies that concentrate resources. Allow teaming with other companies that want to form a complex.
6) Tax credit for changing from oil heat to other technology. 2000$ (Heating oil is a major use of oil but I believe this is mostly domestic crude)
7) Tax credits for switching to LED lighting… 500$
8) Cash for calkers… allow tax credits up to 10K for energy improvement modifications to houses
9) Increase the hybrid tax credit and give a tax break for purchase of energy efficient vehicle (>35mpg). No more of this first xxxx sold phase out crap. Up to 4000K and also governed by price of the vehicle.
10) No stupid time requirements on above code changes. Don’t want the manipulation of bringing demand forward.
11) Tax incentives for living in denser population developments. Help pull people in closer.
12) Increased highway taxes or tolls for people using interstates. F them. If you are using them then you pay for em.

A BIG PROBLEM with anything like I’m proposing. People hate to pay taxes, it will increase costs and consumption would go down. Consumption going down is deflation of the GDP and registers a unhappy face on the economic report card. So, we’d get beat with the GDP stick.

I’d love to see more high speed rail lines intalled simialr to what china is doing. Much more efficient than what we do now. Long term the autolobby, from both sides, see’s that as deflationary. After you get a really nice rail system in place then you have less wear and tear on the autos and again get hit with the GDP stick. You also get hit with the stick by the airplane guys in washington. They don’t want to lose those short hop markets.

Currently trying to get people to understand that GDP isn’t always tied to our happiness. They drag that stick out all the time and beat you over the head with it.

So… meh… what the hell can I do about this anyway.

 
Comment by CentralCoastDude
2010-01-12 10:35:05

CA has a 200mph train in the works and is going to tax weed $50 per ounce and legalize it. (see the latest bill).

 
Comment by oxide
2010-01-12 11:26:34

I hear you, James. But we certainly can’t kick the can too much longer, even without global warming. Gas rationing by price is not too bad of an idea, but until the whole structure of transport is changed, price fixing just punishes the poor. However, anytime someone tries to improve mass transit or urban housing, the “goverment spending” folks, funded by ExxonMobil, start screming.

What we truly need is the 100-mile plug-in hybrid. It goes 100 miles on a charge and another 300 on gas after that. Long-distance commuters will already be punished by needing more gas. Savvy people can buy a solar panel to drive the car. Store the energy in the grid during the day, feed it into the car at night.

 
Comment by polly
2010-01-12 11:51:51

“3) tax break for moving closer to work. Like to see the IRS tax rules changed so you can write off any move that gets you closer to your place of work.”

Not quite what you want, but there is a variation of this available if you start a new job that is substantially further away from home than your old job.

http://www.irs.gov/publications/p521/ar02.html#en_US_publink1000203444

It wouldn’t be too hard to tinker with those rules. Call your Congresscritter.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2010-01-12 12:13:31

James:

How about Mandatory 50% reduction in basic safe drivers auto insurance if you drive less then 5000 miles a year….most people here would love that idea. my 1996 ford just turned 60K miles
———————————————–
4) Additonal tax break for under use of gas beyond the 500 gallons.

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2010-01-12 12:16:47

Central:

And china BUILT 600 miles in 4 years…we are DUMB

http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/01/10/green.trains/
———————-
CA has a 200mph train in the works and is going to tax weed $50 per ounce and legalize it. (see the latest bill).

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 15:39:46

Gasoline?

There are over 4000 petrochemical products made from oil.

Oil is also major building material of most of our daily life:
* Artificial Limbs
* Bags (garbage bags, shopping bags)
* Balloons
* Bandaids
* Candles
* Clothing (polyester, nylon)
* Combs
* Computers, calculators
* Crayons
* Credit Cards
* Dishwashing Liquids
* Disposable Diapers
* Eye Glasses, Sunglasses
* Fertilizers
* Fishing Rods
* Flooring (linoleum, tiles, carpets)
* Garden Hose
* Hand Lotion, Cream, Petroleum Jelly
* Helmets (bicycle, hockey, etc.)
* Heart Valves
* Helmets (bicycle, hockey, etc.)
* Insect Repellent
* Insecticides
* Life Jackets
* Milk Jugs
* Paint Brushes
* Panty Hose
* Parachutes
* Patio Furniture
* Pens
* Perfume
* Rope (nylon)
* Safety Glass
* Shampoo
* Shower Curtains, Shower Doors
* Soft Contact Lenses
* Soft Drink Bottles, Plastic Bottles
* Tape (clear, masking, etc.)
* Tapes - (cassettes, vcr tapes)
* Telephones
* Tennis rackets
* Tents
* Toys, Dolls, Model Cars
* Tires (synthetic rubber)
* Toothbrushes, Toothpaste Tubes
* Trash Bags
* TV Cabinets
* Umbrellas
* Unbreakable Dishes
* Waterproof Jackets, Boots, Pants

And that’s just a small sample. Gasoline is the least of the problem.

 
Comment by james
2010-01-12 18:34:36

Eco,

19.5 million barrels per day… from the DOE

Consumption of oil….

8.989 million for gasoline
3.945 million for heating oil
1.539 million Jet Fuel
1.954 million LPG

Not sure it makes sense to address the LPG number. I think that is a byproduct of refining the oil.

If you just eliminate gasoline and heating oil alone use goes down by 66%. Even with increased use in China and peak oil, still get substantial savings. Course that isn’t practical but you could easily get this number down by 50% of gasoline and probably the entire heating oil with out trying too hard. Hence down 43% from the current rate. This in the country with the largest consumption.

Other incentives to increase efficiency would reduce strain on other resources.

Without tackling jet fuel, I think you could get to 76% reduction in say 20 years. I think we could get to 50% reduction with in 10 years.

That would “fix” half of the trade deficit problem and make a lot of other problems go away.

I’ve been wondering if a good hybrid vehicle solution would be to use a turbine type engine feeding an electrical battery system to electrical motor. Could get much higher thermodynamic efficency. Just make the wear portion of the turbine easily replaceable and part of the maintinance cost. I believe you can get 60% thermal efficency that way. That might put us into the 100+mpg car range. Turbines also have a great power output to weight ratio.

Right now, the current situation says it is more important to have longer engine life. Maybe that is changing and a better energy efficiency becomes the better choice?

Same with alternate materials to reduce weight. Right now they aren’t a good choice. In the futre that might change. Not to mention doing stuff like light rail.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 20:38:33

Good find james. Thanks.

 
 
 
 
Comment by rms
2010-01-12 07:42:56

“U.S. automakers rev up lobbying.”

The fed/gov is also the lender for the automotive consumer since the average buyer can’t really afford to operate and depreciate a $30K vehicle.

 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2010-01-12 08:11:06

This administration has proven to me that it has no real interest whatsoever in creating a sustainable intermodal transport system. This fixation with the auto industry reveals that they still cannot envision any future for America other than an extension of the defunct postwar auto/suburban society.

It’s okay though, by not owning a car the cost to me is minimalized. At the same time though, each morning I see harried parents hurriedly shuttling their kids to day care and school. They’re the ones paying into this beast, whilst they probably harbor the misconception that this administration actually wants a better, more sustainable, future for those kids.

Other nations are taking action, other nations build new bridges, high speed rail lines, intermodal ariports. Maybe the future belongs to them. Meanwhile, we’ll just keeping sending more money to the Middle East, because that model works so well.

snark & rant/off

Comment by MrBubble
2010-01-12 17:39:42

“At the same time though, each morning I see harried parents hurriedly shuttling their kids to day care and school. They’re the ones paying into this beast…”

My brother uses this excuse when I try to nudge him toward carlessness or dropping a car (he went for ca$h for clunkers). What about the children?!

So my question is, what happened to the model where buses would pick kids up for school and day care was done down the street or done by a child’s parent. Oh, that’s right. We need a dual income to buy the big house to fill with twice the furniture and toys and to finance the minivan to hual the kids to day school so that we can pay someone else to raise our kids so that we can work. Gotcha!

Someone wrote here that the wheel is not for the hamster’s amusement…

MrBubble

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 04:00:37

Arizona treasurer says checks will bounce amid budget crisis
abc15.com

PHOENIX — Arizona state legislators go back to work Monday in an attempt to battle a nearly $1.5 billion dollar deficit.

“The February school payment we can’t make, February payroll there’s no money there,” said State Treasurer, Dean Martin.

Martin said unless the capitol buildings are sold before the end of the month, there will be no more money meaning, “If they continue to issue checks without having money from the sale of the buildings, I have to bounce them.”

That’s because Martin said spending has increased double digits during the first two years of the recession, while revenues were dropping at the same rate.

Martin said the biggest issue is what he calls welfare healthcare.

“Ten years ago AHCCCS was only a $200 million dollar agency, today it’s over $2 billion,” he said.

Comment by Jim A.
2010-01-12 06:36:54

Selling toll roads is probably stupid, but selling the CAPITOL? Stupid squared.

Comment by combotechie
2010-01-12 06:54:26

If I were rich I’d buy the Capitol and then evict everyone.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-01-12 07:09:55

and turn it into a Hooters

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by FB wants a do over
2010-01-12 10:15:59

And post a sign in front of it that says.

Realtors, Banksters, and Eddie - stay of the grass.

 
Comment by Eddie
2010-01-12 13:05:39

You mean off the grass?

 
Comment by Lenderoflastresort
2010-01-13 00:37:19

I don’t get why you get so much grief here. Perhaps it’s because your not an “uber bear”. Anyway, keep posting. You make some good points. :)

 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 14:02:38

You’d have to fumigate K Street, and get some extra-concentrated cleaner to mop up all those slime trails through the corridors of power.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-01-12 10:40:40

Well, all the leaders in the Capitol have already been sold, so I guess this is just the next logical step!!

 
 
Comment by Lip
2010-01-12 06:54:32

wmbz,

The “Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System” (AHCCCS) doesn’t seem to be able to live up to it’s name. Maybe if we put the Federal Government in charge of medical care it’ll get less expensive. Yeah right.

Still, those that have lost their jobs need to have their medical needs taken care of (to some extent) and I have to wonder how we’re all going to pay for it. I also wonder how some of those sweet pensions that have been doled out to public employees will be paid by all of us.

It seems like a “Perfect Storm” is forming over our state and someone needs to step up and make some intelligent decisions. Right now, there are no easy choices, only pain and suffering.
I think I heard that about 20% of all fathers are currently unemployed in AZ. Ouch.

Lip

PS: Thanks for all the daily posts

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 04:02:04

What Stimulus? Road Projects Aren’t Boosting Jobs Much ~ (AP)

Ten months into President Obama’s first economic stimulus plan, a surge in spending on roads and bridges has had no effect on local unemployment and only barely helped the beleaguered construction industry, an Associated Press analysis has found.

Spend a lot or spend nothing at all, it didn’t matter, the AP analysis showed: Local unemployment rates rose and fell regardless of how much stimulus money Washington poured out for transportation, raising questions about Obama’s argument that more road money would address an “urgent need to accelerate job growth.”

Obama wants a second stimulus bill from Congress that relies in part on more road and bridge spending, projects the president said are “at the heart of our effort to accelerate job growth.”

Comment by Eddie
2010-01-12 06:44:10

Stunning news. Not the news itself, the fact that the MSM is reporting it. I guess even the AP can’t hide the obvious forever.

 
Comment by Bad Chile
2010-01-12 07:55:12

The reason most of the spending went toward roads is those projects were already planned. Here in New England the crews work every summer, repairing the last 2-4 years worth of winter damage. They drawings are on the shelf, the specifications assembled, and the states know when and where to publish the invitiation to bidders. Even more so, most states already had money allocated to do the road repairs, they simply used Federal funds to pay for it to help offset the loss of income from other sources.

A building, bridge, water treatment plant, wastewater treatment plant, utilities? Those takes years to design, permit, and construct. The design and permitting takes far longer than constructing it, but since all the politicians were business students in college they have no idea what an engineer does, let alone what all that “icky” math is useful for…

Comment by polly
2010-01-12 12:02:28

Exactly. If you want to find the “saved jobs” from federal funding of already planned road repairs, you have to look at what the state would have cut if it had been forced to pay for the needed road work itself. In MA, the cuts would most likely have been in aid to towns and cities which means the job losses were avoided in schools, police, fire, department of public works, recreation, etc.

The first thing we learned in Law and Economics (required one-L class) was “money is fungible.”

 
Comment by aNYCdj
2010-01-12 12:23:20

What I don’t understand Chile is why i don’t see all that money repairing just the bad potholes sink holes etc. Instead I see major construction work here but not the daily ruin your struts and a $700 auto repair job type of work being done.

 
 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2010-01-12 08:22:16

In this day and age no one should be surprised how the highway/construction lobby works, or how twisted state/local procurement processes skew the juicy contracts to the same old contractors - year after year after year.

If one cares to look, one will quickly notice that this administration’s transport plans are scattered and incohesive. There is little talk of grand plans - they are mired by NIMBYism and political infighting. Our political leadership (both sets of clowns) is far to self-serving and fractious to ever pull off a determined nationwide transport plan. Instead a bunch of contractors are being kept alive to rip us off another day. This is all about buying votes and buying time.

Comment by iftheshoefits
2010-01-12 08:30:56

Spending money on roads is the LAST thing that they would want to do, if they really believed we’re all going to die from global warming/climate change cooling/whatever in the next 5/10/50 years. In fact, consumptive stimulus of any sort (even for solar panels) leads to increased fossil energy consumption.

In this cycle, had they done the right things economically they also would have been the right things environmentally, but they missed badly on both counts.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2010-01-12 08:40:40

Yeah right on, I find it pretty hard to get worked up about the polar bears when Uncle Sam is bending over backwards to stimulate consumerism.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 14:05:02

It feels more like Uncle Sam is bending us over.

 
 
Comment by LA Wallflower
2010-01-12 12:24:13

Even if everything falls apart and we’re back to bicycles, horses and wagons and walking, we’re still going to need to move things around on reliable roads. Did you know that there are still roads in use that were built by the Roman Empire?

Roads are really, really important. We won’t have a civilization without them.

(This does not apply to roads laid out to empty desert housing developments)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 16:22:31

Speaking of roads to nowhere, I just saw the movie THE ROAD. Basically the whole earth has been burned up and a father and his young son are walking to the coast, trying to survive and not be taken by bands of roving cannibals. Depressing as hell, but the theater was packed. People seem to have an instinctive sense that something in the basic order of things is about to change, and not for the better.

 
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 16:01:26

2 problems:

1st, the road building industry in this country is so corrupt it’s damn near useless.

2nd, even with “shovel ready” it still takes time to get the ball rolling which means winter arrived. You DO NOT fix roads in the winter unless absolutely necessary.

Comment by aNYCdj
2010-01-12 20:27:02

HAHA Eco…then tell me why Con Ed is digging up our street to put in new gas mains and its not an emergency….

I will be mighty pissssed if they chose a day when it 10 degrees out to shut off the gas to hook up to the new line.

And I don’t think they are that dumb and going to leave 1 side of the street covered with metal plates you cant park on till spring.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 20:41:51

NYC is a world unto itself with its own non-standard (read: insane) ways of doing things.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Lenderoflastresort
2010-01-13 01:03:06

On It. :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 04:03:25

Buffett-Backed BYD Sees U.S. as Key for Electric Cars (Update1)

Jan. 12 (Bloomberg) — BYD Co., the Chinese auto- and battery maker backed by Warren Buffett, may sell a rechargeable electric car in the U.S. as soon as this year to meet demand for fuel-efficient models, the company’s founder said.

“The U.S. is a very important market for BYD in the future, and the electric vehicle is our future,” Chairman Wang Chuanfu said yesterday in an interview at the Detroit auto show. “We will start toward the market in the second half.”

Beginning U.S. sales in 2010 would accelerate the timetable BYD set last year, when the Shenzhen, China-based automaker targeted a 2011 debut. Speeding up the model’s debut in a market dominated by hybrids such as Toyota Motor Corp.’s Prius is “very ambitious and probably too risky,” said Bill Russo, a Beijing-based senior adviser at Booz & Co.

“Introducing a new brand and technology to a mature market is a major task for even the most experienced companies,” Russo said. It “seems like a stretch for a relatively new company like BYD.”

Comment by pressboardbox
2010-01-12 07:49:14

Great. We all know how good Chinese batteries are.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 09:18:05

“…backed by Warren Buffett, may sell a rechargeable”

Geez, Warren must be getting senile… a “rechargeable” Duracell, what’s next, Fruit of Looms that last 10 years? ;-)

Comment by pressboardbox
2010-01-12 11:05:05

Hey! Some of my tightie-whities are probably going on 10.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 07:52:26

“…said Bill Russo, a Beijing-based senior adviser at Booz & Co.”

Typical response, just another AUI: Advising Under the Influence ;-)

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2010-01-12 14:46:56

“Booz & Co.”

How come all I can picture is a bunch of people drinking booze?

 
 
Comment by iftheshoefits
2010-01-12 08:03:03

Ever notice that introduction of rechargeable electric car models is always a year or two out there? It’s the new vaporware.

Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-01-12 10:44:23

It’s like cold fusion: it has been - and always will be - the energy of the future!!

As for the Chinese batteries, am I the only one imagining reruns of the burning Dell laptop fiasco, but this time with cars combusting?

Comment by iftheshoefits
2010-01-12 11:05:08

Heh. You’re absolutely right, except that this time around (at least for the next 10-15 years or so), things will likely not even progress that far. No amount of incentives will generate enough interest in what the manufacturers can offer, with regard to cost vs. mileage range on a single charge.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by james
2010-01-12 12:27:59

Yeah. 64K is all the memory we will ever need.

I think you look at the effective energy stored in gas and compare it to batteries and you see the problem right away.

Gas is something like 12000Wh/kg and batteries are 30-40Wh/kg. You get some back with regenerative braking and some with higher efficiency of the electric motors.

That is typical gas fuel eff gets you to 2400Wh/kg. Still far far away from the battery performance. Two orders of magnitude. That is very far off.

However, there has been progress on supercapacitors and such. If they get up into the hundreds of Wh/kg then we might see a major shift. That is a fast charging car that has 300-400 mile range. There seems to be a lot of good progress going on. Hope it continues. When oil cratered in the 80s, alternate fuel/energy research tanked in a big way.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by yensoy
2010-01-12 11:41:01

Chinese roads are FULL of electric (rechargable-battery) mopeds, scooters and bikes. And these things sell cheap in China, as opposed to the premium prices you pay in the US. I see the move to electric cars wholly within the realm of possibility within the next 5 years. I’m not saying that BYD will successfully bring them to the US in the next 5 years, rather they will sell very well in the world’s largest automotive market within this period.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 16:06:04

Tesla Motors is selling rechargable electric cars. Now.

Comment by iftheshoefits
2010-01-12 17:46:43

If you’ve got an extra $100K lying around.

This is a novelty market, and will remain so for a long while. I think EVs are a great idea, and wish things were different, but I’m completely with Kunstler on this one. Not a chance of them making the impact we all hope for, any time soon.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 04:04:49

Watching TV May Shorten Life for Couch Potatoes, Study Finds.

Jan. 12 (Bloomberg) — Every hour spent sitting idle in front of the television raises the risk of premature death from heart disease by 18 percent, an Australian study found.

Researchers tracked the TV-viewing habits of 8,800 adults and followed them for six years. They found those who spent four hours daily in front of the tube had an 80 percent greater risk of dying from cardiovascular disease than those who watched the box for less than two hours. The association was independent of risks such as smoking, obesity and unhealthy diet.

Prolonged inactivity, which can raise blood-sugar and cholesterol levels, is to blame for the health effects, not the appliance itself, said David Dunstan, a study author and researcher at Baker IDI Heart & Diabetes Institute in Melbourne. The finding, published today in the medical journal Circulation, supports studies from the Rochester, Minnesota-based Mayo Clinic showing that watching too much television is one of the biggest contributors to a sedentary lifestyle and weight gain.

“Too much sitting is bad for health,” said Dunstan, a professor of health sciences. “Avoid sitting for prolonged periods and keep in mind to move more, more often.”

Comment by oxide
2010-01-12 06:48:46

I read someplace that the best activity to counter obesity is constant moderate movement.* Instead of killing yourself with aerobics to get your heart rate up, it’s as good or better to simply stay active all day. Like our ancestors did. So the gurus of the 80’s were wrong, again. (their first mistake was labeling fat as enemy #1, when it’s more likely refined carbs and sugar).

——-
*example for hwy50: a couple years ago a reporter from Men’s Health followed the Amish for a couple weeks to discover how they stayed so thin. The reporter found that the Amish don’t exercise formally, or even bother to keep track. They just walked around doing farm work, constantly, all day. That was enough to keep them thin, no matter what they ate. It’s also tough to snack on Cheetos if you’re busy pushing stuff and pulling stuff and lifting stuff.

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2010-01-12 08:33:26

“…the Amish don’t exercise formally, or even bother to keep track.”

Either does a lot of the rest of the world for that matter. They just take the stairs and walk/bike as part of their lifestyle.

Around here right about now, early January, the gyms will be packed - until about March that is. I know of one particular well known gym here where one can watch the patrons jostle for the closest parking spot - just like they do at the mall!

Comment by aNYCdj
2010-01-12 12:33:34

Edge:

This is why i wish i could get a real decent job again in Manhattan and ditch the car I was in better shape walking standing commuting by public transportation then here…I still walk to the the main shopping area and take my little shopping cart…but it’s so easy with the car right outside.

Either does a lot of the rest of the world for that matter. They just take the stairs and walk/bike as part of their lifestyle.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-01-12 20:53:27

As a regular member of fitness centers since the mid 1980s, I saw the same thing. People creat New Years’ resolutions and go to gyms for a few weeks. Then they get other excuses.

In my mid 20s I would see people around my age huffing and puffing and obese and note what whether I saw them at the gym. Same thing in my 30s. Then I predicted about how fast they would age.

The three legged stool is this: health, financial security, relationships (marriage/family). For most of us, you cannot have all three. You have to realize you give up one of those three. Again I stress “For most of us”. This “most” includes me.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Spokaneman
2010-01-12 08:52:22

I spent a fair amount of time in Northern Indiana Amish country. I would marvel at farmers plowing their fields with 6 horse teams. If you think what it would take to manage an 6 horse teams, its obvious why there is little obesity among the Amish.

I watched a great video on Obesity the other day, the central premis of that video is that in the last 25 years or so, the fast food industry has made it possible to buy 1500 calories , for around $5.00 (todays dollars) without ever leaving your car and always available within a five minute drive. It seems like fast food has been around forever, but it has not. Also, 20 years ago, gas stations were primarially just that, gas stations. Now they are junk food dispensers with gasoline available.

No wonder 50%+ of the poplulation is overweight. Between the effects of smoking and obesity approximatley 60% of the total health care costs are incurred. But, it will never stop, there is too much money to be made.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 16:10:52

Are you implying that unchecked capitalism might be fatal? And the general public is too stupid to care?

We’ll have none of that damn socialeest/commie talk around here, by God and John Wayne!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by combotechie
2010-01-12 06:50:20

“Every hour spent sitting idle in front of the television raises the risk of premature death from heart disease by 18 percent, an Australian study found.”

Lol. Which means risk of premature death more than doubles with six hours of TV watching? How about 500 hours of TV, what’s risk then? Or 5,000 hours?

Why are any of us still alive?

Lol.

Comment by Natalie
2010-01-12 07:01:48

I was thinking the same thing. Even if they meant hour per week, clearly the relationship would not be a straight line. The best fair conclusion they could come up with is that lack of exercise increases your chances of health problems. They should fire everyone involved with this study, as I could have told them that without spending more than 2 minutes on the entire project.

 
Comment by DennisN
2010-01-12 07:02:48

Somehow the editor left out “per day” after the word “hour”.

Changes things, doesn’t it?

 
Comment by michael
2010-01-12 07:54:10

how about every hour per day sat in a chair contemplating the bing bang?

wonder what that does?

 
 
Comment by peter a
2010-01-12 07:08:42

What about reading the HBB. Sometimes that should increase the rate to 100%. Just due to the blood pressure spikes, from reading how stupid governments are.

Comment by oxide
2010-01-12 07:40:13

Or how greedy the banks were. I’m still waiting for the O-man to shut off the spigot, if only to teach the fat cats a lesson. And he doesn’t need that pesky bought-off Senate to do it. He just needs to call up Timmy Boy and say “hey, remember how I pulled you out of the jaws of the media…about 8 times? I got a favor to ask you…”

Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-12 10:23:42

That’s what I like about you Oxide, you’re a dreamer.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-01-12 10:48:23

The Prophet of Change will do no such thing as he leads us to the glorious future… or something…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 16:17:53

Here’s why oxide: CAFRs (comprehensive annual financial reports)

The government at every level (town, city, state, fed) is heavily invested in the markets.

You can google it for the state you live in.

Kill the financial sector and you’ve just killed your local government. Sort of a dead man’s trigger as it were.

And most of the actions of the large corporations are in fact, directed by proxy of the invested governments, who happen to be the majority shareholders.

Now you know why I call it Corporate Communist Capitalism©®™.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by hobo in mass
2010-01-12 07:08:51

What if I sit there with the TV off? These studies really irk me. It has nothing to do with the TV. You could substitute read books for four hours a day and still get the idle effect.

“Every hour spent sitting idle in front of the television raises the risk of premature death from heart disease by 18 percent, an Australian study found.”

This is just horrible reporting and is the reason people are so poorly informed on health issues. So lets take that statement at face value and extrapolate. I will guess that, on average, I have watched two hours of TV everyday of my life. So each year, I watch 730 hours of TV. 730*18%=13,140% increase in risk per year. I’m 39 so multiply my yearly risk by age and that means my risk of premature death from heart disease is increased 512,460% over somebody who never turned on a TV. Either I’m dead or somebody who’s never watched TV has no chance of premature death from heart disease.

Comment by oxide
2010-01-12 07:42:18

They don’t call PhD’s “piled high and deep” for nothin’. Lots of education, no critical thinking skillz.

[in the interest of critical thinking, however, I should note that the two are not mutually exclusive. There ARE lots of people who have a PhD and critical thinking skillz.]

Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-12 10:27:05

That’s why you can only get a PhD after you get the BS.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Wee Willy
2010-01-12 19:52:30

Rochdale College in Toronto was a Non-Degree granting institution. They were supposed to grant certificates and diplomas, but some pot head Chancellor took it literally and started issuing; NON-BA for $100, NON-MA for $50 and NON-Phd for $25 The police drug squad eventually shut them down.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Natalie
2010-01-12 12:40:42

What is worse is that people that don’t feel that good to begin with are the most likely to watch the most TV. I certainly know I watch more TV when I don’t feel good enough to go out. There are so many holes, it is totally useless.

Comment by jane
2010-01-12 23:13:07

Natalie, don’t apologize. There are degrees of everything. I used to watch a lot of TV too, when my mom was dying and I could do nothing to help her. My thoughts were too much to bear on my own.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 05:13:17

AIG, autos offset Treasury bank bailout profits.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. taxpayer profits from bank bailout investments are being offset by estimated losses from American International Group and automakers and mortgage payment cuts for struggling homeowners, a U.S. Treasury report showed on Monday.

The Treasury estimated net losses on its $700 billion bailout program at $68.5 billion for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.

The December report for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, showed that the fiscal 2009 net loss included estimated losses of $30.4 billion for AIG and $30.4 billion for automakers, with $27.1 billion in losses from the Home Affordable Modification Program.

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 05:20:22

The Disposable Worker ~ Business Week~

Pay is falling, benefits are vanishing, and no one’s job is secure. How companies are making the era of the temp more than temporary

On a recent Tuesday morning, single mom Tammy DePew Smith woke up in her tidy Florida townhouse in time to shuttle her oldest daughter, a high school freshman, to the 6:11 a.m. bus. At 6:40 she was at the desk in her bedroom, starting her first shift of the day with LiveOps, a Santa Clara (Calif.) provider of call-center workers for everyone from Eastman Kodak (EK) and Pizza Hut (YUM) to infomercial behemoth Tristar Products. She’s paid by the minute—25 cents—but only for the time she’s actually on the phone with customers.

By 7:40, Smith had grossed $15. But there wasn’t much time to reflect on her early morning productivity; the next child had to be roused from bed, fed, and put onto the school bus. Somehow she managed to squeeze three more shifts into her day, pausing only to homeschool her 7-year-old son, make dinner, and do the bedtime routine. “I tell my kids, unless somebody is bleeding or dying, don’t mess with me.”

As an independent agent, Smith has no health insurance, no retirement benefits, no sick days, no vacation, no severance, and no access to unemployment insurance. But in recession-ravaged Ormond Beach, she’s considered lucky. She has had more or less steady work since she signed on with LiveOps in October 2006. “LiveOps was a lifesaver for me,” she says.

You know American workers are in bad shape when a low-paying, no-benefits job is considered a sweet deal. Their situation isn’t likely to improve soon; some economists predict it will be years, not months, before employees regain any semblance of bargaining power. That’s because this recession’s unusual ferocity has accelerated trends—including offshoring, automation, the decline of labor unions’ influence, new management techniques, and regulatory changes—that already had been eroding workers’ economic standing.

Comment by Spokaneman
2010-01-12 08:58:29

Yeah and this is going to play hell with the concept of employer based health insurance. When half the workforce is a contract or temp worker without health coverage, it will become evident that the concept of employer based coverage’s time has passed.

Many businesses, particularly retail and other high employee count operations actively manage their employees hours to make certain that only a relatively small number receive enough weekly hours to be eligable for employer paid coverage.

I was in the grocery biz for a few years and had great empathy for the cadre of single moms hoping to get enough hours to have thier health insurance costs paid, while trying to figure out how to pay the premiums for thier kids. It was terrible.

Comment by In Colorado
2010-01-12 12:20:45

But I thought that these contracting gigs were supposed to be sweet deals! That no one in their right mind would want a steady job with benefits.

 
 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-01-12 10:52:54

I assume the crumbling job market and dying concept of long-term employment means… “Now is a great time to buy or sell a house!!!”

Argh!

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 16:23:04

“…some economists predict it will be years, not months, before employees regain any semblance of bargaining power.”

They’re wrong. It will be NEVER.

The 1960s were the height of employee bargaining power. It’s been downhill ever since.

 
 
Comment by neuromance
2010-01-12 05:23:01

“There is no countervailing power to the finance lobby in DC. And if there’s no pressure coming into DC, the status quo is going to win.” This was an important point in a Bill Moyers interview with writers David Corn and Kevin Drum, from Mother Jones magazine.

Complexity is the friend of the finance lobby. During the bubble, complex models were created to justify their actions. If one questioned them, one was told, you simply don’t understand, come back and talk to us when you grow a brain. Better yet, don’t bother us at all.

And yet, it was all bogus. Smoke and mirrors.

Simplicity in rules is the enemy of the banks. Complexity allows loopholes. Complexity was what banks hid behind as they built the house of cards.

The simplest rule of all, that would prevent much of this in the future is this: “Banks cannot trade securities.” Point blank.

In the Consumer Financial Products Administration (cFPA), there was the “Vanilla Products Option.” Banks fought this very hard because they can not get around simplicity. Simple rules can prevent the financial industry from running amok, and looting the United States.

With no organized power to bring pressure into DC, a financial crisis will happen again. Because there is no countervailing power in DC, banks can charge interest rates of 10,000%. How? With overdraft fees. The average overdraft is 17 dollars. The average overdraft fee is 39 dollars. That’s 10,000% interest. In 2004, banks introduced legislation that stated that overdrafts were not loans, and thus any interest rate could be charged on them. Mafia-esque.

To give you an idea of how entrenched the banking lobby is in DC, Tim Geithner’s chief of staff used to be a lobbyist for Goldman Sachs. He successfully fought a bill authored by Barack Obama, that would put some limits on CEO pay, back around 2004-2005. Geithner’s chief of staff.

Currently, there is no leadership on the issue. If 99% of the people do not understand what a credit default swap is, you cannot regulate them. As was noted earlier, there is no countervailing power to the finance lobby in DC. There needs to be leadership on the issue. On the Moyers site, there are links to organizations dealing with financial reform - http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/01082010/profile.html

These were some points I gleaned from the piece. Bottom line - there needs to be leadership on the issue. There’s no countervailing power in DC. One thing people can do is write their congress critters and tell them, if you don’t vote for meaningful reform, I’m not voting for you. They need to hear this over and over.

Finally, time is the enemy. In the years 2000-2009, there was no job growth. Median wages hvae not gone up in 30 years. As the financial crisis recedes, it will be business as usual. But the US will be like a patient with a hemorrhage. He will get weaker. We will get more of the same, more wealth stripped from the rest of society and concentrated in the pockets of the financial industry. All with the blessings of the government. But, the patient is going to get weaker and weaker. I think we can do something about it, but we need to get organized. The financially responsible can be an effective voting bloc. We’re in the minority, but look at how many other swing-vote minorities get attention and drive policy.

Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2010-01-12 09:24:29

Simplicity in rules is the enemy of the banks. Complexity allows loopholes. Complexity was what banks hid behind as they built the house of cards.

Please remember this the next time you hear someone go on about how we need more regulation, “oversight”, “watchdogs”, etc., etc.

Corruptissima res publica plurimae leges, and all that.

Comment by oxide
2010-01-12 16:17:06

Nice try. I haven’t forgotten when you tried to hoodwink me with the twisted wingnut-welfare piece on the “number” of regulations.

Please observe the difference between the word “regulation” and the word “regulations.”

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 16:28:13

Where is this alternative world you live in, LehighValleyGuy? The one where people don’t lie, cheat, rob, steal and kill for money? We’d all like to move there.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 05:27:31

Oil-product imports may grow as U.S. refinery market suffers.

TOKYO (MarketWatch) — A rough road of regulatory obstacles, dull demand for oil products and weak profitability has driven U.S. refiners to cut capacity, likely setting the market up for a growing reliance on imports.

And consumers will be the ultimate losers.

Massive regulatory hurdles make it highly unlikely the U.S. will see any new refineries built anytime in the near future, “if ever again,” said Neal Ryan, a managing partner at Ryan Oil & Gas Partners LLC.

The nation’s last so-called grassroots refinery, one built from scratch, was completed more than 33 years ago.

The lack of new refineries and shut downs of old ones will result in a bottleneck, the likes of which will create “more of a regional than national market for various fuels,” said Ryan, explaining that as some refineries are shut in, certain areas of the country will “become much more reliant on foreign imports versus U.S. refining capacity to satiate market demand.”

Comment by combotechie
2010-01-12 07:54:43

Here’a good illustration of how deflationary forces can cause a reduction of capacity which in turn causes a shortage of product an thus higher prices.

Deflation => reduction => shortage => price hikes.

Just as inflation can sometimes result in lower prices, deflation can sometimes result in higher prices.

Comment by drumminj
2010-01-12 08:13:58

and this makes cash king…how?

Comment by Michael Viking
2010-01-12 08:48:30

Cash has been trash at least since last March. One could have practically invested in anything and done better in the ~1 year time frame.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by cactus
2010-01-12 09:57:16

“Cash has been trash at least since last March. One could have practically invested in anything and done better in the ~1 year time frame.”

Its the Treasuries plan flush out the hoarders of cash by paying nothing on it. Seems to be working. You can almost bet on the FED keeping this up until we have inflation pressures. however I think it will back fire and commodity prices will soar, dollar will go down too fast and then interest rates go up and more deflation.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-12 10:40:37

Zero interest does not seem to flush out gold hoarders. I don’t think it flushes out cash hoarders either. High interest rates would flush out cash hoarders.

We’re all getting flushed anyway.

 
 
 
Comment by cactus
2010-01-12 09:52:01

Just as inflation can sometimes result in lower prices, deflation can sometimes result in higher prices.

yes it just takes time. I was explaining this “feed back loop” in free markets a few days ago.

 
 
Comment by measton
2010-01-12 08:38:08

Big oil has bought up refineries then shut them down to create shortages, just like maintenance always comes during the peak driving season. You really think big oil can’t manipulate gov just as wall street does??

Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-12 10:54:26

Who did the oil boys buy them from?

Comment by iftheshoefits
2010-01-12 13:46:01

You know, the mom ‘n pop refineries.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by lavi d
2010-01-12 14:03:20

Who did the oil boys buy them from?

The independents

“A few years ago, when gasoline prices first crossed $2 a gallon, executives from Big Oil said flatly that it made no sense for them to build refineries because returns wouldn’t be sufficient.”

-Kiplinger, May, 2008

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 05:41:39

Fed split over impact of mortgage purchases
January 12 2010 ~ FT

Federal Reserve policy-makers are divided over the potential impact of their plan to end the purchase of mortgages on a still-fragile housing market recovery.

Different Fed officials believe the spreads on mortgage-related securities could go up anywhere from a quarter to three-quarters of a percentage point when the Fed stops buying mortgages by the end of March.

Comment by pressboardbox
2010-01-12 07:53:50

The Fed should buy ANYthing that can’t be sold. They should buy houses, strip-malls, cars, boats, couches, pets - anything that is having trouble finding a buyer. They could use craigs-list. The stimulus effect would be huge. Using accounting magic it could all be done with the Fed making a nice profit. Everybody wins!

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 08:56:18

The Fed is the price fluffer of last resort. Perhaps they could even help stimulate the deflated adult entertainment industry, through strategically-targeted helicopter drops of monetary Viagra?

Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2010-01-12 11:59:24

“The Fed is the price fluffer of last resort.”

PB, what a fantastic turn of phrase! :-) That’s priceless!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Carl Morris
2010-01-12 13:41:37

This sucker’s going down.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 07:58:15

My prediction:

Either the Fed won’t follow through with plans to stop MBS purchases by the end of March, or the cessation of mortgage purchases will be accompanied by another govt program of equal or greater size to continue suppressing mortgage interest rates.

Comment by hobo in mass
2010-01-12 08:13:26

Could the unlimited support to freddie and fannie be involved?

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 08:49:34

Absolutimento. My first thought on the Christmas Eve news that their $400 bn credit limit was getting abolished was that the Fed must be getting ready to outsource its MBS purchase program to the GSEs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 11:06:39

“Fed split over impact of mortgage purchases”

Let’s see if I can shed some light:

Fed buys lotsa MBS =>

Mortgage interest rates fall =>

Buyers are qualified to buy homes at higher purchase prices relative to their incomes =>

Effective home purchase demand is artificially inflated

=> Home prices are artificially propped up.

Any questions?

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 13:38:49

Follow up point:

A logical consequence of the Fed’s effort to artificially prop up home prices during the Great Recession is that future home price appreciation will be “smaller than expected.” Over the long run, home price appreciation is driven by fundamentals, not crazy lending, speculation or hair-of-the-dog stimuli.

 
Comment by jbunniii
2010-01-12 14:29:04

Can it go on forever, or will prices eventually be allowed to fall, even in the still ridiculously overpriced Bay Area?

Comment by jbunniii
2010-01-12 14:31:01

P.S. I noticed this morning a high-rise condo building in downtown San Jose was sporting huge new banners reading “only 3.5% downpayment required.” This along with artificially low interest rates goes a long way toward explaining why prices refuse to fall significantly.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2010-01-12 14:43:23

Prices will fall. Remember the climb of prices didn’t happen over night. Patience grasshopper, patience.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 16:58:21

Ten years up (1997-2007), ten years down (2007-2017) does that seem about right?

 
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2010-01-12 21:29:26

“Ten years up (1997-2007), ten years down (2007-2017) does that seem about right?”

No, it seems wrong in so many, many ways. However it does seem about correct. :(

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 06:10:57

Census May Jump-Start U.S. Jobs Rebound With 1.2 Million Temporary Workers, reports Bloomberg News. ” The 2010 census couldn’t have come at a better time for the U.S. economy.”

~~ Taxpayers must fork over a bundle of cash to pay people to come to their doors to count noses. It doesn’t grow a single turnip, manufacture a widget , or produce anything of value except a mountain of data that may re-arrange the political map. How does that boost net wealth in the USA?

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 07:51:35

Not sure about boosting net wealth, but my understanding is that a census is crucial for taxation purposes.

“And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be taxed. …”

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 07:54:55

Count your blessings: At least today, the census comes to you. How would you like to face the added requirement of riding a donkey back to your city of origin?

Comment by Kim
2010-01-12 09:20:28

Either way you’re sitting on your ass.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 10:11:31

:-)

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-12 10:56:03

HAHA!

 
 
Comment by Arizona Slim
2010-01-12 12:58:27

Even worse, try riding that donkey while you’re great with child.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by San Diego RE Bear
2010-01-12 21:30:41

Now there’s an interesting mental picture of PB! :D

 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-01-12 17:37:13

How would you like to face the added requirement of riding a donkey back to your city of origin?

Precisely why Rome never had a census which required everyone to return to their home town to be counted- an absurd idea, especially given how difficult travel was in those days. But it did make a good story… (even though I think it only made one of the gospels)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by measton
2010-01-12 08:40:23

Taxpayers must fork over a bundle of cash to pay people. It doesn’t grow a single turnip, manufacture a widget , or produce anything of value .

For a minute I thought you were talking about GS type banking.

Comment by Spokaneman
2010-01-12 09:02:09

The primary purpose of the census is to apportion the representatives in the House of Reps. Hence there should be an uproar of unprecidented proportions about the Obama admin pulling the management of the census out of the dept of commerce and directly under the W/H. Gerrymandering has been around for years, but this is one step to far.

 
 
 
Comment by pressboardbox
Comment by pressboardbox
2010-01-12 07:02:41

Its amazing how much fake money you can make with fake money. We all should get to try it. We could all be man of the year. People are smart.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 07:33:25

Don’t try it at home — counterfeiting is illegal.

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2010-01-12 10:53:00

Only if you get caught. :)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 14:11:05

Counterfeiting is illegal unless the Fed does it. Then it’s called quantitative easing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Al
2010-01-12 07:55:32

If I were a betting man, I’d gamble they have at least $300 billion in unrecognized losses on the purchase of mortgage backed MBS.

$1.25 trillion of MBS purchased
assuming 30% losses
= $375 billion

but heh, that $45 billion is nice too.

Comment by polly
2010-01-12 12:20:07

Only if you actually mark-to-market, and that is, you know, only for suckers….

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Prime_Is_Contained
2010-01-12 13:23:25

“$1.25 trillion of MBS purchased
assuming 30% losses
= $375 billion”

My impression was that the vast majority of what they were buying were Freddie/Fannie bonds, in which case the taxpayer was already on the hook for any losses. The Fed as owner would/will get paid in full regardless of whether the underlying pool is bad—just as any private owner would/will.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by BlueStar
2010-01-12 07:29:30

Get this: Liquidating firms claim billions in U.S. stimulus

The blood suckers who swept in to pick up WAMU and other failed banks debt now stand to gain billions from carry forward tax losses. These hedge funds buy the debt for pennies on the dollar then turn around and claim tax credits worth 5-10 times what the debt costs.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idCNN1218704420100112?rpc=44

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 07:48:53

There is obviously big money to be made in exploiting the loopholes in government reflation efforts, for those who are in to that sort of thing.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 11:14:46

It is difficult to not grudgingly admire the cunning logic of bailout engineering.

MarketWatch First Take

Jan. 12, 2010, 10:02 a.m. EST
Everyone’s doing it, why can’t the government?
Commentary: Fees, Fed profits suggest bailouts may pay off

By MarketWatch

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — All of this intervention into the U.S. financial system by Washington has had an unintended side effect. Federal officials are starting to act like bankers.

Just as bankers are gearing up for another big bonus season reminiscent of the payouts of the mid ’00s, the Feds are squeezing the bailed out financial industry like a investor on the wrong side of a trade or a credit card holder a few days late on his or her payment.

Reuters
Chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke

It’s not just the fee or one-time tax proposed by the Obama administration. See story on administration’s proposal.

Ben Bernanke’s Federal Reserve announced Tuesday that it made a record profit of $46.1 billion last efforts to rescue the country from the worst economic and financial crisis since the 1930s. See report on Fed’s bailout profits.

For all of the criticism given to Treasury officials for being close to Wall Street interests, there’s no denying they’ve employed some of the financial industry’s tricks when it comes to the bailouts.

First, they forced several banks including J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (JPM 43.04, -1.49, -3.34%) and Bank of America Corp. (BAC 16.40, -0.53, -3.13%) to sign onto the bailout programs. Then Feds started collecting fees and pushing banks to lend more. Though not every effort has been successful, there’s new hope for taxpayers that the government. (???)

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 06:12:49

China Raises Banks’ Reserve Requirement Ratio 50 Basis Points.

Jan. 12 (Bloomberg) — The People’s Bank of China raised reserve requirments for the nation’s lenders by 50 basis points effective Jan. 18, according to a statement posted today to the Web site of China’s central bank.

 
Comment by SD renter
2010-01-12 06:18:02

An appraisor called me with a Duplex in Barstow, Cal. The only real city between San Bernadino and Vegas. FHA owns it and it’ll rent for $1100-1200. I might get it for $30,000 cash. I thought I would never buy for at least 2 years. Time will tell if I am an FB.

Comment by jess
2010-01-12 06:51:23

The figures sound good , to pay for it in about 5 years. Just remember that being an absentee Landlord is almost never a good idea. also in that state the taxes and fees may eat you up .

Comment by Spokaneman
2010-01-12 09:06:34

Never buy a rental unit that you cannot see every day. Never buy a rental that you cannot stop by easily to collect the rent. Never buy a rental in a neighborhood that you would not like to visit in the middle of the night.

Oh, wait, never buy a rental unit. Whatever you think you might make, the hassle just isn’t worth it.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 16:37:25

Agreed. Rehab and sell is where the money is.

Being a landlord is “iffy” at best. It can be done profitably and with a minimum of problems, but it’s, well, “iffy.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Asparagus
2010-01-12 07:04:42

Curious, why did he call you? Is he a friend?

Why not take out a 30,000 mtg and make the money himself?

 
Comment by peter a
2010-01-12 07:14:45

Have you been to Barstow?

 
Comment by Eddie
2010-01-12 07:17:44

Is that where the big thermometer is?

Comment by Steve W
2010-01-12 08:38:46

No, it’s in Baker

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 12:32:34

An appropriately named city, they just added the “r” to make it possible for “out-of-state” land sales. ;-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by cougar91
2010-01-12 07:31:27

I drove through Barstow from LV on my way to LA. It didn’t seem to be a duplex can be rented for $1100 as there doesn’t seem to be much activity going on there, other than being a stop between LV and LA. I could be wrong though as I only based that on what I saw from the freeways. If you can really buy it for $30K and rent it out at $1100 per month then it could potentially be a great investment as the own-rent ratio is very much undervalued.

Comment by Ben Jones
2010-01-12 07:48:49

‘The only real city between San Bernadino and Vegas’

There’s a reason for this.

‘it’ll rent for $1100-1200′

This is suspect. I’ve stayed in Barstow a couple of times, and I’ve never seen so many abandoned houses/buildings.

‘Why not take out a 30,000 mtg and make the money himself’

If the condotel buyers had applied this concept, they would have never purchased.

Comment by Bad Chile
2010-01-12 07:58:20

I’m in my late 30s. About 30 years ago the family (me, three older sisters, mum and dad) were on a road trip to California. Blew a radiator in Barstow.

Took three days to get a new one.

I have no desire to ever return to Barstow.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by lavi d
2010-01-12 13:27:29

I have no desire to ever return to Barstow.

Ha!

 
Comment by REhobbyist
2010-01-12 14:11:10

We drove through Barstow 31 years ago on our way to California from Michigan. No AC in the old Volkswagen, 100 degrees in August. When we stopped for gas I was delirious and started yell/asking the gas station attendant why anyone would want to live there. Now we live in Sacramento. Go figure.

 
Comment by Sagesse
2010-01-13 02:39:01

Hey it only took one day to get a new clutch in Turkey, in the hills near Iraq. That was also 30 years ago. One day to fetch it, and one day for a villager to install it.

 
 
Comment by Rental Watch
2010-01-12 14:01:16

There is a major intermodal rail yard expected to go in either in Barstow or farther south, in Victorville. I think it is going to end up in Victorville. The problem is that lots of people were banking on it going in Barstow.

Like Ben, I would be very concerned with supply. The other major concern is jobs. How are people going to make the money to pay the rent?

No thanks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by lavi d
2010-01-12 13:25:22

It didn’t seem to be a duplex can be rented for $1100 as there doesn’t seem to be much activity going on there

There’s a Marine Depot there, which I would assume is the major activity for the area. There’s a bit of tourism in that the railroad switchyard is enormous and has a decent little museum and there’s the Calico Ghost Town.

For some reason, buses full of tourists stop at a McDonald’s housed in a huge faux barn with train cars out front, overlooking afore-mentioned switchyard. I believe these are probably LA tourists being bused to Vegas.

Other than that, the only mall in town was abandoned long before the current recession and if you cruise “old” Hwy 58* (Route 66), you’ll come to the conclusion that the non-military population consists mostly of hookers, tweakers and gang members.

*Not to be confused with Old Hwy 50

Comment by In Colorado
2010-01-12 16:08:40

For some reason, buses full of tourists stop at a McDonald’s housed in a huge faux barn with train cars out front, overlooking afore-mentioned switchyard. I believe these are probably LA tourists being bused to Vegas.

Ugh! I stopped there once. That has to be the dirtiest and nastiest McDonald’s in the whole world.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 08:06:01

I am hung up on the definition of ‘real city.’ My impression of Barstow is that driving through is one of the hoops one must jump through on the way from SoCal to LostVegas. It appears to be a trading outpost that morphed into a sprawling bedroom community (kind of like Vegas, actually!). With a little luck, none of your kids will need to use the restroom and you will have sufficient fuel in the tank to drive straight through.

Not suggesting it is a bad place to invest, but rather that $30,000 might be too high (but I really have no idea from your description of the property or my dearth of knowledge about who would decide to live in Barstow and why…).

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 11:57:17

“…my dearth of knowledge about who would decide to live in Barstow and why”

Ssssssssssssssshhhhh, Barstoe is a straight line on Hwy 58 East of Bakersfried, in fact,if Barstoe had oil, pesticide & carrots, they could be twin sister cities, just substitute “gold miners” for “Buck Owens” cowboys ;-)

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-01-12 20:32:56

Barstow. All I remember is a place of large dirt hills and a few fast food places. On the way between N. Cal. and Phoenix or LV. It was only nice for just eating a “Hot N Juicy” Wendy’s burger at a restaurant with my mom 30 years ago. Otherwise “get out of here FAST!”

 
 
Comment by cactus
2010-01-12 10:02:59

‘it’ll rent for $1100-1200′ in Barstow

yea right

Comment by aNYCdj
2010-01-12 12:49:52

That’s Total not each apt.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 10:04:15

FHA owns it and it’ll rent for $1100-1200

You sure it’s not a four-plex? $1200.00 / 4 = $300.00 per unit for Barstoe that might “dead” on.

Rod Tidwell (Cuba Gooding, Jr.) (Cuba’s from Barstoe)

“Tidwell tests the LandLord’s resolve through a very long telephone conversation, which culminates in the famed “Show Me the Money!” telephone yelling match between themselves” :-)

They have x1 daily Amtrak that stops there, at the platform, they have a cool route 66 museum.

Just down the road they filmed “Baghdad Cafe” ;-)

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 10:52:39

Are you sure the 4-plex plan would not generate 4X the rate of physical property depreciation as a 1-plex would?

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 12:28:39

Might depend on “occupant density per unit” & “how-many-cats-they -”care”-for” calculations… ;-)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 13:36:07

I’m wondering if going from a 1-plex to a 4-plex might inadvertently increase density per square foot — a version of increasing returns to scale?

 
 
 
 
Comment by lavi d
2010-01-12 13:14:34

Barstow, Cal. The only real city between San Bernadino and Vegas.

Barstow? A city???

That would make Ridgecrest a major metropolis…

:)

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 14:13:26

An appraisor called me with a Duplex in Barstow, Cal. The only real city between San Bernadino and Vegas. FHA owns it and it’ll rent for $1100-1200.

Sounds like my personal idea of life in hell.

 
Comment by fecaltime
2010-01-12 14:33:10

I travel through Barstow all the time. I almost bought a triplex in Yermo a few years back for 40K. The rents on those places were 350.00 each. They were one bedroom units. I highly doubt a landlord would be able to collect 1100-1200 on your average unit in Barstow. I know the price appears good, but something is rotten in Denmark, if it were such a good deal it would not have fell into your lap like that.

Fecaltime!

 
Comment by jbunniii
2010-01-12 14:33:24

Only $30k? Pay cash for it, then I guarantee you won’t be an FB.

 
 
Comment by stpn2me
2010-01-12 06:21:48

When do you plan on making this purchase?

I am working on an assignment now. It wont be for at least two years.

Comment by combotechie
2010-01-12 06:26:55

“It won’t be for at least two years.”

The economy might become quite “Interesting” in two years.

Save up the dough.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-12 06:32:04

Things can change a bit in two years, and I hope you give yourself some significant time after you finish to let your attitudes adjust out of warrior mode before you take a house as your next “assignment”.

One can live well (and free) for several decades on that kind of money, or one can be a slave for several decades paying that kind of debt.

 
 
Comment by Lip
2010-01-12 06:36:31

The kind of war I can believe in

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=afZr1H_gTltg&pos=12

Make mine a Dos Equis Amber

 
Comment by Eddie (the Great)
2010-01-12 06:40:06

Morning all.

Took the dogs out this morning and it was a balmy 29 with the sun coming up. Which is still cold but after a week of 12-15 degree wake ups, it felt damn near tropical. Rumor has it we might see the 50s tomorrow….I’m getting out the sunscreen.

Comment by X-philly
2010-01-12 07:10:30

Good morning E to the G.

Are you in Atlanta?

Comment by Eddie
2010-01-12 07:16:16

Yep.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 08:07:17

Are you trying to convince us that global warming is real?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by CentralCoastDude
2010-01-12 10:58:21

Global warming is real. Don’t fear it.
All of the ideas are good for the planet anyway.
Peak oil is real too.

Fox News is not real.

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 11:25:41

“Fox News is not real”.

Please post a list of what you consider “real” news providers, and why.

 
Comment by Eddie
2010-01-12 13:08:22

I love you libs getting all bent out of shape over the realization that your religion is a hoax. But your messiah Gore sure did make a killing, eh?

Is MSNBC real by the way? Moot point since nobody actually watches those loons anyway.

 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-01-12 15:47:36

Moot point since nobody actually watches those loons anyway.

Moot point since nobody actually (listens to you) anyway?

Are you not embarrassed sir?

Two of your main points have been rents are rising and it’s been a garden variety recession.

Since about New Years there have been dozens of stories pointing out rents are under extreme downward pressure and all metrics put this recession as the worst since the great depression.

Since about New Years you had pretty much disappeared. Maybe because of all the headline stories mentioned above made you look foolish?

Now you are back but your buffoonery is not forgotten.

 
Comment by exeter
2010-01-12 16:57:34

With each passing post by Eddietard, it becomes glaringly obvious that his pathology is ObamaDerangementSyndrome.

Enjoy the long ride WindowLicker. ;)

 
 
Comment by james
2010-01-12 08:57:45

You know Bear, way back in 98-99 I believe the ice wall between the Arctic ocean and the Atlantic/Pacific oceans melted and the water started mixing. Possibly this has something to do with the ice melt off.

My thought was this would disrupt weather and potentially cause a temporary cooling in the northern hemisphere. Or it might last a while longer.

Also, if this causes enough cooling you might get permanant snow cover further south along with potential drought (less water vapor from the lower temps). The snow cover ends up acting like a reflector so positive feedback means even cooler temps.

Course the effect might be an increased circulation of water to the pole resulting in a net cooling effect that persists for a long period of time.

Consequently the “tipping point” might have already occured more than a decade ago and so we are too late.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-12 11:18:40

James,

Points for an active amagination! However, I don’t think you interpret the meaning of “ice wall” properly, nor do you realize that these oceans have always been connected.

In 1958 it was discovered that there is water all the way to the North Pole (under the ice). It was only around 1900 that ice was discovered even to exist at the North Pole.

 
Comment by james
2010-01-12 12:48:33

Like I said… way back in the hazy 90s.

Heck might be back in the late 80s.

Hell, I might have imagined the whole darn thing.

Still, don’t mind me. I will have fun thinking about it.

 
 
 
 
Comment by jess
2010-01-12 07:20:41

Noticed at 10 pm last night that Sarasota Florida was colder then we were here in upstate SC . They were at like 34 degrees then . Wow , what wacky weather .

 
Comment by pressboardbox
2010-01-12 07:40:10

All the hot air you expel is beginning to pay off.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 07:25:31

Does anyone have available a history of the periods QE was utilized over the course of the Fed’s existence (back to 1913)?

Quantitative Easing

A government monetary policy occasionally used to increase the money supply by buying government securities or other securities from the market. Quantitative easing increases the money supply by flooding financial institutions with capital in an effort to promote increased lending and liquidity.

Investopedia explains Quantitative Easing

Central banks tend to use quantitative easing when interest rates have already been lowered to near 0% levels and have failed to produce the desired effect. The major risk of quantitative easing is that although more money is floating around, there is still a fixed amount of goods for sale. This will eventually lead to higher prices or inflation.

 
Comment by cougar91
2010-01-12 07:27:54

I must have missed a HBB memo or something.

When did Eddie -> Eddie The Great?

And what did he do to deserve such a title?

Just wondering. :-)

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 09:52:18

It went something like this:

Wally Cleaver: “Great, Haskell’s ringing the door bell…” ;-)

Comment by Eddie
2010-01-12 13:10:09

Can you explain to me what this haskell thing is all about? I’m guessing it’s some kind of insult, but I don’t know what it is. Help me out.

Comment by james
2010-01-12 15:00:16

Watch some “Leave it to Beaver”. Can probably find it on youtube or hulu. Eddie Haskell is the troublemaker kid that always gets the Beaver into situations.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 16:33:40

It’s not an insult eddie, it’s a “classification”, If I wanted to insult you I wouldn’t call you a “Haskell”, I’d say something more like… ;-)

“TrueHaskell™” = “But, but, but…” = eddie The Great

The son of George and Agnes, Eddie Haskell was the smart-mouthed best friend of Wally Cleaver. The character, has become a cultural reference, recognized as an archetype for insincere sycophants. Ward once remarked that “[Eddie] is so polite, it’s almost un-American”. The archetype became so well known that the term “Eddie Haskell” was adopted into everyday use.

He was known for his neat grooming — hiding his shallow and sneaky character. Typically, Eddie would greet his friends’ parents with overdone, good manners and often a compliment such as, “That’s a lovely dress you’re wearing, Mrs. Cleaver.” However, when no parents were around, Eddie was always up to no good — either conniving with his friends, or picking on Wally’s younger brother Beaver. Eddie’s two-faced style was also typified by his efforts to curry favor by trying to talk to adults at the level he thought they would respect, such as referring to their children as Theodore (Beaver’s much-disliked given name) and Wallace, even though the parents called them Beaver and Wally.

A weaselly wise guy, Eddie could be relied upon to connive and instigate schemes with his friends — schemes for which they would be in the position of blame, if (and usually when) caught.

wiki/Eddie_Haskell

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 17:02:59

It’s a generation gap kind of thing…no terrible insult, though. In fact, you may even take the association as a compliment.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by X-philly
2010-01-12 10:13:25

yesterday a poster gave him the moniker and he ran with it for a while

Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-12 11:22:41

This pegs him at a tender 16 years old in my book. No profanity please.

 
 
 
Comment by NoSingleOne
2010-01-12 07:36:24

:( = the filter

Really would help to have a posting policy, Ben.

Comment by Ben Jones
2010-01-12 07:51:06

Here’s a policy; if you are going to post a long piece on race from a website, I’m going to have to read it a couple of times to see what’s in it. And it may be a while before I can get to it.

Comment by NoSingleOne
2010-01-12 14:23:21

Fair enough.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 07:43:34

It seems like gloomsters are coming out of hiding over at Marketwatch dot com. Did they somehow miss the memo that the stock market always goes up, over the long run? Still more interesting is the persistent tendency of Mr Market to hone in on opening bell levels whenever traders give it a little dust up early on in the trading day (such as this morning, for example), while the dollar concurrently absorbs yet another blow on the FOREX market.

Perhaps my optimism is misplaced, as the passing of Wall Street bonus season, coupled with many said bonuses having been paid in shares, may now presage a massive sell off.

Who is in charge of offloading stock market corrections onto the back of Uncle Buck (yet another good way to dump Wall Street losses onto Main Street’s back)? Is this a fair question for the Fed audit to address, or is this a monetary policy secret?

Indications

Jan. 12, 2010, 8:57 a.m. EST
Alcoa miss sends U.S. stock futures lower

By Steve Goldstein & Kate Gibson, MarketWatch

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Alcoa Inc.’s disappointing kickoff of the fourth-quarter earnings season sent U.S. stock futures lower on Tuesday.

S&P 500 futures fell 8 points to 1,134.5 and Nasdaq 100 futures fell 11.75 points to 1,871.75. Futures on the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 68 points to 10,536.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 11:09:26

Today’s score card:

Uncle Buck +1
Risky assets -1

 
 
Comment by cougar91
2010-01-12 08:07:23

Bad news: if you are 35, you are over the hill.

Economic, health worries make 35 the new 40
Reuters (Jan 12, 2010)

Research by the Philips Center for Health and Well-Being showed that 40 was previously widely considered as the milestone that defined middle age but this has been lowered to 35.

“Thirty five is the new 40 as Americans feel the pressures of middle age earlier than ever,” the Amsterdam-based center said in a statement.

Katy Hartley, the director of the center which aims to improve quality of life, said stress about the economy and healthcare that you would typically associate with turning 40 is starting at a younger age.

“The data suggests the new age for middle age is 35,” she said in an interview.

Nearly 80 percent of 35 year olds questioned for the Philips Index said they were concerned about the economy, and three-quarters were also worried about healthcare. These stresses, according to the study, have contributed to the feeling of early onset of middle age or the loss of five years of youth.

The report showed the economy topped the list of stressors for most Americans at 74 percent which was nearly double from a 2004 survey. A nearly equal amount said they feel positive about their overall health and well-being.

But many Americans may not be realistic about their health.

Only 39 percent of Americans consider themselves to be overweight, according to the index while a report by the National Center for Health Statistics showed 67 percent of Americans are overweight or obese.

Americans seem to accept being overweight as normal.

“I think the data would support that,” said Hartley.

Although most Americans said they are in good health, only 51 percent think they are as fit as they could be and 66 percent wished they exercised more.

When they do get sick, more than half of the 1,503 Americans who were questioned for the index said a doctor would be their first choice for getting information, followed by the Internet.

“The role of doctors remains important. Fifty-three percent of people still see their doctor as the first source of information and the second source of information is the Internet,” said Hartley.

But most people seek the company of family and friends to improve their health and well being, while job and salary were far less important.

“Initially it looks fine. We all feel great about our health and well being. I think when you dig a level deeper that Americans are struggling to balance spending time with their family, with their jobs, with the economy and with stress levels,” said Hartley.

Comment by Eddie
2010-01-12 08:39:35

Yet something new invented to worry about. Every day there is a new article about something that will kill you. Now I see merely reaching 35 is it. On top of germs everywhere you look, global warming, global cooling, too much mercury in fish, eating too much salt, not enough salt, eating too many eggs, not eating enough eggs, not drinking enough milk, drinking too much milk, exposure to the sun, not getting enough vitamin D from the sun.

And let me guess the cure for all these 35 year olds about to kick the bucket is passing ObamaCare ASAP, correct?

Comment by edgewaterjohn
2010-01-12 10:08:42

There’s no money in healthy - happy people.

Comment by X-philly
2010-01-12 10:14:30

wtf weren’t we all supposed to be dead from swine flu by now?

OH THE HUMANITY

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by In Colorado
2010-01-12 08:47:40

I can certainly imagine that a lot of people are suffering from hypertension, being overweight and stressed out.

 
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-12 11:27:01

I have to call B.S.!

I did not even have time to have a midlife crisis until I was in my 50s!

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 14:19:08

I would define middle age as the point at which there are no more easy answers, at least not to life’s big decisions.

Comment by polly
2010-01-12 15:39:20

So, around 17? Because these days I would consider taking out student loans a big decision…

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 16:23:44

I’ve met some really old souls who weren’t much older than that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 08:21:41

At least the San Diego housing market is still offering good opportunity for fraud schemers to make a buck these days:

Four charged in defrauding Filipinos of homes
Owners persuaded to sign over homes

By Eleanor Yang Su, UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 at 12:01 a.m.

Watchdog Update

Background: In March, The San Diego Union-Tribune published an investigation showing how a group doing business under the names Amerisian and Apocalypse trusts persuaded more than a dozen San Diego County families to sign over their house deeds with the promise of helping to lower their mortgage payments and avoid foreclosure.

What’s changing: The county grand jury has indicted four individuals linked to the trusts, and prosecutors have charged them with 54 felony counts, including foreclosure consultant fraud, grand theft and securities fraud.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 09:43:31

“…A sales pitch on its now-defunct Web site urged “American and Asian brothers and sisters” to “let your estate pay you.” ;-)

I had a friend the was schizophrenic, he was put into a “home” in “Gabage Grove” CA…typical 3bd 1 bth stucco with no landscaping… he was “living” there with x6 other individuals with similar “ailments.” Beds on the floor, x1 old refrigerator, etc. etc.
It was “owned” by a Filipino lady who always showed up in a new Mercedez with gold dangling all over her body, I later found out that she intercepted all the SS checks & Sec 8 payments from her “patients” :-)

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-01-12 20:29:44

Schizophrenic?

I have a friend who was agoraphobic and claustrophobic. Used to sleep in doorways. He is now very happily occupied as a doorman in NYC.

Ta Da Dum!

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-01-12 20:37:27

How coincidental! I was ripped off by a Brunei national who was born a filipino. I put her in jail. Woot! I doubt if this was the same embezzler. All the Sou Cal “wimmin” I met through singles site ripped me off. So I’m not impressed with the phoniness here. The climate keeps me here though.

 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 14:21:22

“Apocalypse Trust.” Wow, that would inspire investor confidence.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 08:28:18

There has never been a better time to be too-big-to-fail.

Economic Report

Jan. 12, 2010, 10:07 a.m. EST
Small-business index fell in December
Firms shedding jobs, cutting inventories amid weak sales, NFIB says

By Rex Nutting, MarketWatch

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - U.S. small businesses are stilling shedding jobs and cutting inventories amid weak sales and low expectations, the National Federation of Independent Businesses reported Tuesday.

The NFIB small-business index fell in December to 88.0 from 88.3 in November, the lobbying organization said. The index has been below 90 for two years and bottomed at 81 in March. Read the full report on the NFIB website.

The index has been in a narrow range since April, in contrast to sizable gains in such indicators such as the Institute for Supply Management index, which is dominated by large firms.

The single biggest problem for most firms remains poor sales, followed by taxes and government regulation.

“So why hasn’t owner optimism soared like it usually does at the end of a recession, especially one that cut so deeply into our economic fabric?” asked William Dunkelberg, NFIB chief economist. “The answer is ‘hope and change.’ There is little hope and the change that is being delivered is far from encouraging. Washington is offering nothing but higher taxes and fines and fees and more regulation.”

“Confidence in our political leadership has tanked,” Dunkelberg said.

Comment by measton
2010-01-12 08:57:09

The answer is ‘hope and change.’ There is little hope and the change that is being delivered is far from encouraging. Washington is offering nothing but higher taxes and fines and fees and more regulation.”

I think the main problem is that most small business = bubble jobs that existed only because of easy money. The ptb used these jobs so that there wouldn’t be riots as manufacturing in the US was gutted. The problem is no higher taxes (small business actually received tax cuts) it’s that customers have no money and so they don’t go to tanning salons, restaurants, they don’t redo the kitchen, or go on vacation. Poof there go a pile of small business jobs.

Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-01-12 10:29:10

measton …I agree with you . In a contracting economy how is it that
they think that it’s a good time to open up small businesses, especially when the current ones are just struggling to survive . You combined
the contraction and unemployment with the competition from
bigger stores like WalMart and it’s a horrible time to open up a new business .
Apparently AAA (Automotive Club ) sent out a notice that people were deferring their car repairs and they urged people to not do this . I guess they are getting far more called to rescue people on the road .

Other than a few specific areas where a new business could work ,it’s a horrible time for possible failure ,especially if you have to borrow money to start that business . I guess if you had a business that had low start up costs and you didn’t have to buy a lot of inventory you might have less risk .

 
Comment by james
2010-01-12 14:55:14

Meh. I don’t know. One of the things I wonder about is if we are just seeing so much technology shift that we don’t need to work as much as we used to.

There seems to be so much abundance.

Now, resource depletion is something to be aware of along with wealth distribution. Not to mention concerns about things in the third world. However, still thinking problems are primarily with pricing not with stuff. AKA this is a currency and debt problem and not anything else.

If I’m remembering correctly, we seem to have massivly overbuilt housing in a mere three to five year period. Even if labor had been allocated elsewhere, such as making plastic junk, I think we wouldn’t be significantly constrained.

The only thing that really worries me is oil. Honestly think that is a non-issue if we got real serious about it. Right now, we are kind of halfway sort of interested.

Even healthcare debate is primarily focused on paying for everything. So, you have to look at the sources for the costs. Probably find that most of that comes from marginal treatments and education costs. You could have loan write offs for doctors, cut salaries and possibly fix half the problem. Drugs and other marginal treatments… tougher to fix. Aside from buying drugs from technology stealing firms outside the US. Course that is kind of like outsourcing. Sucks for autoworkers and such but OK if it happens to scientists, chemists exc that work for drug companies.

The marginal treatment means the threshold for prescribing drugs is very low. So if some treatment helps in 10% of cases then the drugs will be perscribed in 100% of cases. Or something like that. See CH Smith who had some good write ups on that.

Rambling away on some semi fact oriented journey today…

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 08:33:27

Behold the consequences of tying your city services budget to a real estate bubble:

San Diego County Faces Another Economic Crisis
Video published January 8, 2010

Above: San Diego County Treasurer Dan McAllister predicts collecting $50 million less in revenues because of declining property values. The editors discuss.

By Megan Burke, Hank Crook, Gloria Penner, Natalie Walsh

January 8, 2010

GLORIA PENNER (Host): Although there may be some signs that housing prices are now inching upward, the County is just now seeing a drop in property tax revenue from the decline in home values that began in 2007. So we put San Diego Treasurer Tax Collector Dan McAllister on the record and asked him what that decreased revenue means to San Diego.

DAN McALLISTER (SD County Treasurer - Tax Collector): Well every year that we take in revenue, it’s divvied up between a vast number of places to go. Cities get revenue, redevelopment agencies get revenue, but probably the biggest recipient of revenues from property tax dollars in San Diego County, and throughout the state really, are our schools. And in fact about 43.3% of every dollar we bring in goes to our K-12 school systems. And they are the ones that are the biggest deficiency holders, if you will, and they suffer the most when there is a lapse in revenues. Such is the case this year. We project about $50 million less in revenues that will be taken in by taxes this year and we also see that that will continue on into next year. So that number will grow and it will impact schools as well as libraries and all the other services that many government agencies provide.

PENNER: Joining me now to discuss the County’s economic outlook are John Warren, editor and publisher of San Diego Voice & Viewpoint, and Leslie Wolf Branscomb, editor of San Diego Uptown News. John, let me start with you. Lets talk about those millions lost and property taxes because of declining home prices. If we do see a recovery this year, will property taxes recover with better funding for those services that Dan McAllister says have suffered?

 
Comment by reuven
2010-01-12 08:39:12

I read the article in today’s Times about Obama’s proposed tax on banks and can’t help but think this is the stupidest idea ever. The banks will simply pass the costs on to us!

With an estimated $500,000,000 in tax fraud related to improper first-time-home-buyer credits (and growing! See: http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/housing/2009-10-22-homebuyer-tax-credit-fraud_N.htm) why not start there as a way of getting some more money?

Or how about auditing every stated-income mortgage application from the past 7 years and making sure people paid income tax on their stated income?

Is Obama trying to buy votes, even if they cost $8,000 apiece (in the form of fraudulent tax credits?)

Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2010-01-12 09:53:54

I read the article in today’s Times about Obama’s proposed tax on banks and can’t help but think this is the stupidest idea ever. The banks will simply pass the costs on to us!

Yes, this is more FDR-style fake populism. The MSM will love it. It also plays on the popular belief that you can punish an inanimate object. The banksters will pretend to take a hit, but it will not cost them a dime personally.

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-01-12 20:39:15

Right On!

 
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-12 11:29:36

Relax. By the time the bankers lobby get finished writing the legislation, it will not be a tax on them at all.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 14:23:41

I read the article in today’s Times about Obama’s proposed tax on banks and can’t help but think this is the stupidest idea ever. The banks will simply pass the costs on to us!

You know that and I know that, but the yahoos will think he’s sticking it to the banksters. As if.

Isn’t change grand?

Comment by polly
2010-01-12 15:41:45

You guys are assuming that the banks aren’t already charging the maximum the market will bear for their services. Possible, but not a slam dunk.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 16:28:54

Obama and the Republicrats get us coming and going. First they give their bankster controllers a massive taxpayer-funded bailout - not counting the “hidden bailouts” through tax breaks and sweetheart deals - then in a contrived show of “sticking it to the banks” Obama hits them with fees THAT WILL BE PASSED ON TO US, THE PUBLIC. A total screwjob coming and going. To those who voted for this “change,” how about accepting some accountability?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by reuven
2010-01-12 20:34:32

To those who voted for this “change,” how about accepting some accountability?

Sadly, the people winning are the non-Taxpaying class. The 50% of Americans who pay little or no Federal income tax and who whine about helping “Main Street” instead of “Wall Street.”

 
 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-01-12 20:41:04

“An” some of the yahoos are on this blog. (I also see through this - costs will be passed onto the bank “customers.”).

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 08:41:13

The title of this radio piece suggests outright that San Diego housing mania still bubbles just below the surface, at least in the hearts minds of true housing bubble believers. I love how the ‘expert opinion,’ that “It is always a good thing when home values go up,” is met with no critical scrutiny whatever.

Housing Market On Its Way Up :-)
Video published January 8, 2010

Above: San Diego County home prices are creeping higher and higher. But, is it enough to be optimistic for the future? KPBS Reporter Sharon Heilbrunn investigates.

By Sharon Heilbrunn, Gloria Penner

January 8, 2010

GLORIA PENNER (Host): We start our economic analysis with the local housing market, which has in been in a steep dive for the past two years, but recently home prices have been on the rise. KPBS Reporter Sharon Heilbrunn has an update on the current status of buying and selling homes in San Diego.

SHARON HEILBRUNN (KPBS Reporter): For almost a year, home prices in San Diego County have crept higher. The most recent home price index report from Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller showed that home prices in San Diego County rose .4 percent from September to October, when home buying activity usually slows down.

So, is this a reason to be optimistic about the housing situation in San Diego? Mark Goldman, a certified mortgage planning specialist and lecturer at San Diego State University, is hesitant.

MARK GOLDMAN (SDSU Lecturer, Certified Mortgage Planning Specialist): It’s always a good thing when home values go up. We’ve lost a great deal in value in San Diego. Prices are down over a third, about a third of homeowners are upside down on their homes. So it’s good that prices don’t decline further. What does it tell us about the future? Not very much, unfortunately. I’m hoping we’re nearing a bottom in the market. But the two questions I always ask is, what brought us here, and what’s changing?

Goldman attributes improvements in the housing market to very low interest rates and supports from the first time homebuyer tax credit.

GOLDMAN: In 2009, the federal reserve committed to purchase on and a quarter trillion in mortgages and to help support the residential mortgage market.

But what happens when this government help expires?

GOLDMAN: Those supports, those props of the market, are going to be removed during the first quarter and first half of 2010. My concern for 2010 is that none of the fundamental problems that brought the housing market down have not been addressed, in my opinion.

Goldman is talking about unemployment, which is at 10 percent right now in San Diego County, and active foreclosures.

GOLDMAN: The number of active foreclosures — the last report was in Oct 2009 — are almost double what they were the year before.

But there are some promising signs.

GOLDMAN: One of the things we’ve seen in the last 30 days is that the gov’t has tried to put more pressures onto banks to mitigate foreclosures by doing realistic loan modifications or allowing deeds in lieu of foreclosure or allowing short sales.

And this is still a buyer’s market.

GOLDMAN: Home prices have fallen to the point where the cost to own is similar to the cost to rent. So if someone is thinking about buying a home and staying in it for a long time, this could be a great opportunity.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 09:31:29

“…So if someone is thinking about buying a home and staying in it for a long time, this could be a great opportunity.”

MARK GOLDMAN SDSU Lecturer, ;-)

Oh, are lecturer’s tenured full time employees? or does GOLDman and his “significant other” have expired real estate license’s?

 
Comment by lavi d
2010-01-12 13:35:21

For almost a year, home prices in San Diego County have crept higher.
… So, is this a reason to be optimistic about the housing situation in San Diego?

Well, no. Not if you wanted to buy a house at an affordable price.

 
Comment by lavi d
2010-01-12 13:44:18

So, is this a reason to be optimistic about the housing situation in San Diego?

Also, why is it that so many of these articles and shows take the home owner’s point of view?

What about buyers? Why don’t they matter?

 
 
Comment by reuven
2010-01-12 08:47:32

Here’s a letter I sent to a newspaper editor today:


Dear Editor:

It’s hard to see how President Obama’s proposed tax on banks will ultimately serve his political purpose of responding “to the anger building across the country” over big bonuses and record profits. After all, these taxes will merely be passed along to their customers raising prices for all of us.

Here’s a better idea: Eliminate the first-time home buyers tax credit. Why? Because the program overrun with fraudulent claims.

A Reuters report from October 23rd 2009, quoting Treasure Inspector J. Russell George, stated that at least $500,000,000 of the claims so far have been fraudulent. People had either owned homes before or listed someone else in their family–in several cases young children–as the home buyer.

It seems that given a chance, Main Street is as crooked as Wall Street, and that’s truly sad.

What’s sadder is that the President won’t respond to this. And by not responding, he’s made it clear that he’d buy votes for his reelection with taxpayer money at $8,000 apiece.

Sincerely,

Reuven S*****

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 08:57:36

The Top ‘Recession Porn’ Stories of 2009
Posted by Brad Tuttle Tuesday, December 22, 2009 at 10:15 am

With an apparently resurgent economy, the media genre known as recession porn may be gone for good. What, exactly, is recession porn? You know it when you see it. Basically, it’s the fascination with all the weird ways the recession has affected different groups of people—the rich and privileged especially, because everyone knows the financial crisis has been tough on the working classes. In this look back, you’ll see that recession porn stories include the economic downturn’s impact on celebrities, the Queen of England, and workers in the actual porn industry.

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 09:29:03

What a great idea Bob Putz has come up with…

GM’s Lutz: Higher gas tax would help.

DETROIT (CNNMoney.com) — Bob Lutz is generally not a close ally of environmentalists.

The vice chairman of General Motors is a frequent critic of fuel economy rules and once declared that global warming was a “total crock” of excrement, although he used a more common and colorful word in that description.

Lutz also declared in 2004 that hybrid cars didn’t make sense to sell or buy. And just this week, as he and GM were hyping the new electric Chevrolet Volt, at Detroit’s North American International Auto Show, he declared that internal combustion engines would dominate the auto industry for the next 20 years, no matter what advances were made in electric vehicles.

So Bob Lutz wouldn’t seem a likely candidate to argue for significantly higher gasoline taxes, or to suggest that such taxes would be a good thing for the auto industry. But in a meeting with journalists at the auto show Monday, he did just that.

“If the rise in gasoline prices is gradual, I think that all of us in the industry would frankly welcome that, because there is nothing more illogical than forcing fuel-saving technology when gasoline is extremely cheap,” he said when asked about any concerns about oil again rising above $80 a barrel.

Comment by measton
2010-01-12 10:34:33

Only because Bob Lutz knows that raising fuel taxes is cryptonite to politicians.

It is the best thing we could do for the country however. Tax gas and cut income taxes or payroll taxes and or small business taxes.

Comment by aNYCdj
2010-01-12 12:58:28

Measton:

Most people in Big cities couldn’t care less if its $5 a gallon. Because of mass transit we drive so little or have no car at all…

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 17:11:12

Uhm, the only decent mass transit systems is your region and some spots on the west coast.

The rest of us HAVE to have cars just to live.

I live in the 4th largest city. Buses. Yep, that’s it, Just buses. Unreliable buses. And if you live in the suburbs, nothing. Well, Park n Ride for your suburban to downtown only, workforce and that’s just the morning and then the evening.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Eddie
2010-01-12 13:16:17

Why not cut all taxes? Why is it the de factor answer to any problem in the universe INCREASE SPENDING AND TAXES?

Why is it never let’s cut spending by 5% and cut taxes by 5% too? Too radical for hope n change I guess.

Comment by oxide
2010-01-12 16:34:01

Because the Republicans already cut taxes, supposedly to stimulate business, and what did business do? They pocketed it as a windfall and sent jobs overseas anyway. And they couldn’t leave well enough alone. They liked their windfalls so much that they started putting windfalls on the national mastercard.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Eddie
2010-01-12 16:56:26

You conevniently didn’t answer my question. Read it again. And this notice the reference to cut spending. What the Republicans did was cut taxes, which did generate extra tax revenue (as tax cuts did in the 60s and 80s). Unfortunately like in the 60s and 80s, spending was increased by much more.

 
 
 
 
Comment by joeyinCalif
2010-01-12 11:56:24

Customers don’t want to drive electrified skateboards? Oil is simply too plentiful and cheap to make electric and alternative fuel vehicles practical and competitive?

Then we shall raise gasoline taxes and force them into it. It’s for their own good. Government knows best..

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 09:30:28

“[China can't] go from third-world communist hellhole to the world’s second major economy without some serious bust-ups…especially when the communists are still in control.”

~Bill Bonner.

Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-12 11:34:36

Why not?

They have probably been the world’s largest economy more times and for longer than any other bunch of yahoos. They could make pots and pans with hammers and be the world’s largest economy.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 09:59:15

WTH? I doubt our gubmint would ever “falsify” data, that’s just unheard of!

* Greece condemned for falsifying data

Greece was condemned by the European Commission on Tuesday for deliberately falsifying data about its public finances and allowing political pressures to obstruct the collection of accurate statistics.

In a damning report published as the eurozone grapples with its worst fiscal crisis since the euro’s launch in 1999, the Commission said Greece’s figures were so unreliable that its budget deficit and public debt might be even higher than the government had claimed last October.

At that time Greece estimated its 2009 deficit would be 12.5 per cent of gross domestic product, far above the 3.7 per cent predicted in April. It revised its 2008 deficit up to 7.7 per cent from 5 per cent.

Comment by measton
2010-01-12 10:35:53

This is probably true for every country on the planet right now.

 
 
Comment by cactus
2010-01-12 10:22:53

Wall Street Journal

Despite the mortgage meltdown, financial firms are coming off a blockbuster year. Revenue has rebounded to pre-crisis levels, and 2009 compensation is on pace to approach or surpass the record payouts of 2007.

well thast all thast important Wall Street was saved everything else can be out-sourced

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 17:14:17

And don’t you forget it you peon!

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 10:24:25

(Hwy wonders what Molly Ivins would have to say ’bout her fellow Texan’s social experiments…) ;-)

4 year old Hippie child boy put on suspension:

“…The Mesquite ISD’s dress code has been enforcing hair length since at least the 1970s, when the district sent home a 10-year-old boy because his hair touched his collar.”

Mesquite ISD says 4-year-old disciplined for long hair can upbraid his locks

http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/weird/Follicle-Fight-Goes-to-School-Board-81152687.html
Tue, Jan 12, 2010

 
Comment by measton
2010-01-12 10:32:31

You remember when US sentiment was overwhelmingly against TARP, yet the bankers were able to get their paid for stooges in Congress to vote for it, after the initial vote failed.

LONDON – The Icelandic government held emergency talks Tuesday to come up with an agreement on repaying British and Dutch investors $5.7 billion so it can avoid a divisive referendum on the issue.

A spokesman for Icelandic Prime Minister Johanna Sigurdardottir said the country’s leading political parties had agreed to work together to revise terms for the disputed payment to the two countries over a failed Icelandic Internet bank.

The dispute has jeopardized Iceland’s bid to join the European Union and threatened crucial bailout funds for Iceland promised by the International Monetary Fund and Nordic countries.

The government was forced into organizing the nationwide vote, which must be held by March 6, after President Olafur R. Grimsson last week refused to sign the so-called Icesave bill.

Grimsson’s decision rode a wave of popular opposition to the bill, named after the high-interest-paying Internet bank that went bust, leaving the British and Dutch governments to fork out compensation for their citizens.

While the government argued that the bill was necessary for Iceland’s economic recovery, opponents were angry that Britain and the Netherlands succeeded in imposing tougher terms on repayment.

If those two countries agree to revised terms that are also palatable to Iceland’s opposition parties, the referendum could be averted — a scenario the government is keen to see.

It seems Icelanders suffer the same problem, ie bought and paid for politicians.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 10:47:46

I guess it is difficult for a government to stand up to torch-wielding mobs?

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 12:19:13

“…Remember all that talk about torches and pitchforks? Well, Iceland went ahead and broke out the torches (ok - they’re flares, technically)”

Let’s see “Free Markets” operate in real time, how long would it take someone to set up a “Flare & Pitchfork” retail shop? :-)

Comment by Blue Skye
2010-01-12 12:39:57

It’s called Agway.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 10:32:38

Federal Bias Toward Homeownership ~~ Tad DeHaven

The Wall Street Journal ran the story last week: “U.S. Now a Renters’ Market.” Apartment vacancies hit a 30-year high in the last quarter of 2009, and rents are falling in most markets. For current or former homeowners trying to stumble out of the debris left from the government-fueled housing bubble, a renter-friendly environment is a positive opportunity.

But it’s also a reminder of how the government’s obsession with homeownership continues to distort the market for housing. As the Journal notes, “Government efforts to prop up the housing market also threaten the apartment sector by making it easier for some renters to buy homes. Some landlords have reported a slight uptick in renters moving out to buy homes.”

Homeownership in the U.S. began an upward trajectory following the federal government’s plunge into the housing market during the Great Depression. Prior to that fewer than half of Americans owned their own home according to University of Pennsylvania Prof. Thomas J. Sugrue. Owning one’s home is now viewed in this country as American as apple pie. but as Sugrue points out, this mentality is “a story riddled with irony”:

http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2010/01/11/federal-bias-toward-homeownership/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Cato-at-liberty+%28Cato+at+Liberty%29&utm_content=Google+Reader

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 10:45:28

The fact that Uncle Sam remains persistently obsessed with the drive to turn all Americans into home owners is yet another sign the bubble is not through deflating.

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2010-01-12 11:03:48

I don’t see as a deflating bubble. The bubble has been popped and its pieces are slowly coming down to earth.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 11:28:16

Is there such a thing as a “parachuting bubble”?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Carl Morris
2010-01-12 11:31:21

Ouch, that just triggered a memory of the Challenger as the debris slowly came down from extremely high altitude. Unpleasant, but probably an appropriate comparison.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 11:40:39

Right — I was suppressing that memory, but I think the Challenger image is much more fitting than my parachute analogy.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 10:43:56

Good interview here with a REIC insider who comes across as much more forthright than average. I especially enjoyed the conjecture over the San Diego “shadow inventory” — it seems even REIC insiders have only a vague notion of the scale of this, or how it will unwind.

I personally find Goldman’s suggestion that we are “nearing the bottom of the roller coaster ride” highly questionable. Earlier on in the interview, he acknowledged the huge role of the government, including Fed MBS purchases and the firstany-time homebuyer tax credit, in propping up home prices. By analogy, if you suddenly redesigned a roller coaster so that the biggest hill flattened out half-way down, wouldn’t there still be a large drop off ahead before one finally reached the bottom of the roller coaster ride?

Missing from the discussion (at least the portion I heard):
1) Any consideration of whether banks are colluding to withhold inventory from the market;
2) Any questions regarding the likely impact of prime and Alt-A resets on the high end prices over the period through 2013;
3) Any reference to the fact that in the recovery from the last substantial real estate bust (in the early 1990s), there was a five year lag (from 1991 to 1996) between the end of the recession and the point where the housing market roller coaster reached the bottom of the hill;
4) Any notion of what will suffice to prop up home prices once the government stimuli are withdrawn later this year.

P.S. Try not to catch yourself a falling knife buying San Diego real estate long before the roller coaster reaches the bottom of the hill.

These Days
Housing Market Outlook for San Diego

An audio recording of this interview will be posted here within a few hours of the live broadcast. A transcript will also be added within 24 hours. Thank you for your patience.

By Maureen Cavanaugh, Sharon Heilbrunn

January 12, 2010

Maureen Cavanaugh: The New Year is here and with it comes new optimism about an economic recovery. We all know it has to happen sometime, and most of us are hoping this is the year.

In San Diego, a lot of the economic recovery we’re hoping for comes in the form of real estate. Homeowners have seen the value of their properties shrink the last two years and homebuyers have seen mortgage money dry up. What are the realistic expectations for the San Diego real estate market in 2010 and how do we start preparing for them?

Guest
Mark Goldman, mortgage broker with Cobalt Financial Corp.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 11:03:21

“… mortgage broker with Cobalt Financial Corp”

The problem with taking this guy’s views at face value is that no matter how honest at heart or knowledgeable in mind he may be, his income stream nonetheless depends on a broad perception that the San Diego real estate recovery is gathering steam and home prices are headed back up to the stratosphere. Suppose he secretly suspects (as I do) that San Diego home prices have maybe another 30 percent to fall (at least in real terms — after adjusting for Fed-engineered “higher-than-expected” inflation over the next five years), with no bottom reached until 2013; is he going to reveal that information on a radio talk show interview? I think not. Think of this interview as a subtle advertisement for home sellers and related service providers and you will have the right perspective on what he says.

 
Comment by edgewaterjohn
2010-01-12 13:37:08

“We all know it has to happen sometime…”

That’s got to be the most sound rationalization of an imminent return to boom times I’ve read yet. Does she carry a little sack of chicken bones around with her too?

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 13:51:49

“…By analogy, if you suddenly redesigned a roller coaster so that the biggest hill flattened out half-way down, wouldn’t there still be a large drop off ahead before one finally reached the bottom of the roller coaster ride?”

Speaking of “flattening” what will this do for San Diego?

Earthquake swarm continues at California-Mexico border:

“The California border continued to rattle with significant seismic activity five days after a 5.8 earthquake struck the region.”

LA Times

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 14:30:24

That wasn’t an earthquake. It was the tremor caused by all those people who want to get into California. The Governator said so.

 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 14:29:09

I personally find Goldman’s suggestion that we are “nearing the bottom of the roller coaster ride” highly questionable.

Goldman has no interest in depicting the true state of the economy, which would cause people to adopt a bunker mentality and stop spending. They want the gullible fools of the “investing public” to BELIEVE the bottom is in, so they’ll rush out and buy the overpriced stocks that insiders are all to happy to dump on them.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 14:34:23

“…they’ll rush out and buy the overpriced stocks…”

Goldman is a mortgage broker, so his income goes up or down with home sales. But the principle you suggest for overpriced stock sales applies just as well to overpriced homes.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 16:34:21

Sorry, I thought we were talking about Goldman Sachs.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 16:44:05

I suppose there is a plethora of “gold men” in the FIRE sector?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by michael
2010-01-12 11:04:44

from the history channel discussion yesterday:

i kind of like pawn stars. i think it is relevent to history. not full blown historical stories…but filled with tidbits about small and somewhat meaningless objects from history.

i think it’s interesting. although i think the channel has fallen to the TLC gods (i remember with TLC meant The Learning Channel).

nat geo and the science channels are just about the only TV i watch now (with a little history and discovery channels thrown in.)

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 11:26:58

Best time to sell Treasurys? When the economic news is turning out to be “worse than expected.”

market pulse

Jan. 12, 2010, 1:08 p.m. EST
Treasury sells $40 bln in 3-year notes at 1.490%

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — The Treasury Department sold $40 billion in 3-year notes (UST3YR 1.43, -0.07, -4.74%) at a yield of 1.490% on Tuesday, around where traders expected for the second of four big debt sales this week. The amount matches last month’s auction.

Indirect bidders, a group that includes foreign central banks, bought 38% of the sale, compared to an average of 59.3% at the last three. However, direct bidders — investors buying for their own accounts — purchased a record 23.4%, compared to 7.1% on average recently. The broader bond market remained higher after the auction, buoyed by as a combination of news out of China, Greece and Alcoa (AA 15.57, -1.89,-10.80%) that raised concerns about the outlook for economic growth.

Q. Is the Fed included in the “direct bidder” category?

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 11:28:10

More Homeowners Struggling As Option ARMs Reset Higher
CNBC ~~ 12, 2010

Thousands of American homeowners are starting to see their monthly mortgage payments skyrocket, dealing a fresh blow to the already shaky housing recovery.

The widely feared reset of thousands of option adjustable-rate mortgages-where both interest and principal payments rise sharply-is already leaving many homeowners struggling to keep a roof over their head.

“It’s going to kill off housing,” warns Patrick Pulatie, CEO of Loan Fraud Investigations, a predatory lending audit firm. “We have pretty close to 500,000 option ARM payments going higher in California over the next couple of years. The impact of the higher payments will be devastating for homeowners who are having trouble now making ends meet.”

Option ARM mortgages, which have been around since 1981 and are aimed primarily for people who had fluctuating incomes, became popular during the housing boom. Terms of the loan usually allowed the borrower to make low monthly payments initially-sometimes by just paying interest only.

But as the terms of those mortgages now readjust, homeowners are facing much higher mortgage payments at a time when the value of their house has plummeted and many are out of work. In some cases, homeowners who chose a very low starting interest rate have actually seen the overall amount of their mortgage increase-known as negative amoritization-putting them even deeper in debt.

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 11:34:25

Kiddie Kandids files for bankruptcy, closes studios.

The Great Recession caught up with another Utah-based business Monday. Kiddie Kandids filed for bankruptcy and shut down nearly 200 photography studios in malls nationwide.

Employees of the photography business, which is based in Sandy, heard whispering about the closing during the weekend, and got the confirmation they feared Monday morning.
“Effective immediately, Kiddie Kandids must completely cease operations and relieve all employees of their positions with the company.” - Dale Merrill, President of Kiddie Kandids

“Yesterday was a perfectly normal day, business as usual,” said Kristen Turner, a Kiddie Kandids studio manager. She had even received a promotion in recent weeks. Now, she’s filing for unemployment.

“I’m the sole breadwinner in the family ‘cause my husband has been unemployed for a while,” Turner said.

Now, she’s fighting for survival, along with hundreds of other company employees across the country.

“We have four children,” Turner said, “and we’re doing everything we can just to hang on.”

Kiddie Kandids started off in a mall kiosk in 1974. It grew to 184 studios in malls across the country that specialized in portraits of babies and children. Now all studios are locked up, and employees are locked out.

Comment by oxide
2010-01-12 16:36:54

Damn, and this place went out of business in UTAH??? Things must be really bad.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 11:37:33

Issa Says Someone Must Be Held Accountable for AIG.

Jan. 12 (Bloomberg) — Darrell Issa, the lawmaker looking into the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s efforts to limit American International Group Inc. disclosures during the credit crisis, said the government must hold someone responsible.

“Who do we hold accountable for these lost billions, and what’s wrong with the system that the New York Fed can hand out your tax dollars in these quantities and not think it’s particularly important to make sure it’s the right amount,” Issa, a California Republican, said today in an interview on Bloomberg Television. “I think the American people deserve somebody’s head on a platter.”

E-mails obtained by Issa show the New York Fed requested in 2008 that AIG withhold information from public filings about payments to banks. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who was president of the New York Fed at the time, was asked to testify before a congressional committee about the effort to limit AIG’s disclosure on the payments that retired credit-default swaps.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 16:36:25

I’m starting to really like this Darrel Issa guy. Sounds like he’s actually serious about safeguarding the pubic interest.

 
 
Comment by cougar91
2010-01-12 11:47:46

Don’t know if anyone saw these figures on TV (yes CNBC I am afraid to say) this morning:

Cumulative Mortgage Default Ratio, 2006 Origination:

Alt-A: 38.8%
Optional-ARM: 49%
Subprime: 61.3%

2007 figures are only a couple of % behind 2006 #s.

As mentioned before I do not believe there will be a sudden spike in Alt-A and Optional-ARM mortgages in that well-known reset chart in late 2010/2011 as that is already happening as we speak. Optional-ARM is only 12% behind the worst of the worst, subprime and Alt-A is 20% behind.

Comment by Spokaneman
2010-01-12 15:12:54

61.3% of Subprimes are in default nationwide? If that is correct it would be utterly astounding. Tht sounds way too high to me.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 16:38:11

I have a feeling the real shocker is going to be when all those “renegotiated” mortgages of 2008-2009 starting going belly up.

Comment by exeter
2010-01-12 17:01:54

Someone here linked to an article where 2009 vintage paper is failing at … get this….. 11%.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 11:50:02

How soon again will this Fed housing market price support program end? (I initially thought this was a recent story, until I took a closer look at the year…)

Fed to Begin Buying Mortgage-Backed Securities

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: January 5, 2009

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York said Monday that it had begun purchasing mortgage-backed securities in an effort to bolster the battered housing market.

The program, initially announced Nov. 25, allows the Fed to spend $500 billion to buy mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and another $100 billion to directly purchase mortgages held by Fannie, Freddie and the Federal Home Loan Banks. The program is aimed at driving down the price of mortgages and making home loans more available.

The New York Fed is overseeing the program for the Federal Reserve. The New York Fed is working with four investment managers — BlackRock, Goldman Sachs Asset Management, PIMCO and Wellington Management Company — to purchase the securities.

Up to $500 billion in securities will be purchased by the end of the second quarter.

The mortgage-backed securities being purchased are considered investment grade and are not the packages of loans that helped ignite the current credit market turmoil. An initial sharp rise in defaults in 2007 among subprime mortgages — loans given to customers with poor credit history — helped touch off the continuing credit market downturn. As defaults continued to rise, the value of securities backed by subprime mortgages plummeted and investors shied away from purchasing the risky debt.

Mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are typically higher-quality prime mortgages and not pools of subprime loans, meaning they carry less risk.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 16:40:09

How people can read things like this without becoming absolutely furious escapes me. The blatant rip-off of the public for the benefit of the Banksters is so brazen it defies description. And yet the sheeple slumber on.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 17:19:59

Will you be quite? I’m trying to watch American Idle.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 11:52:04

For the academic geeks in the virtual room, this article might be worth a read:

Estimated Impact of the Fed’s Mortgage-Backed Securities Purchase Program

Johannes C. Stroebel, John B. Taylor

NBER Working Paper No. 15626*
Issued in December 2009

We examine the quantitative impact of the Federal Reserve’s mortgage-backed securities (MBS) purchase program. We focus on how much of the recent decline in mortgage interest rate spreads can be attributed to these purchases. The question is more difficult than frequently perceived because of simultaneous changes in prepayment and default risks. When we control for these risks, we find evidence of statistically insignificant or small effects of the program. For specifications where the existence or announcement of the program appears to have lowered spreads, we find no separate effect of the size of the stock of MBS purchased by the Fed.

This paper is available as PDF (137 K) or via email.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 11:58:24

The Buzz
Hip hip hooray! Oh, wait.
By Paul R. La Monica, editor at large
January 12, 2010: 1:20 PM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — It looks like those pesky corporate earnings reports may rain on Wall Street’s parade.

Stocks have been rallying for months, largely on the hopes that the economy and corporate profits would bounce back sharply this year. But aluminum producer and Dow component Alcoa kicked off the fourth-quarter earnings period Monday with tinny results that disappointed investors.

Considering that analysts and investors have been waiting for several quarters now for companies to finally show even faint signs of life on the top line, shouldn’t Wall Street be cheering instead of panning Alcoa’s results?

Nope. And here’s why. All the enthusiasm about how much better the economy seemed to be getting at the end of last year has led to some unreasonably high expectations.

Many investors seemed to think that the economy was something that could simply be turned on like a light switch. But this light switch clearly has a dimmer.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 17:21:59

“…solid… recovery. Solid, solid, solid…. recovery…”

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 11:59:28

Senator urges SEC probe NY Fed over AIG emails
WASHINGTON
Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:36pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. regulators should investigate whether laws were violated when the New York Federal Reserve Bank under Timothy Geithner urged insurer AIG to limit discussions about payments to banks, a Republican lawmaker said on Tuesday.

Republican Senator Jim Bunning of Kentucky, a member of the Senate Banking Committee, said an email exchange released on January 7 that showed the New York Fed advising American International Group Inc to withhold information about its derivatives counterparties from its Securities and Exchange Commission filings raised serious issues.

“Because the information withheld appears to be material information about the financial condition of AIG and the value of the company, these actions may constitute a serious violation of the securities laws,” Bunning said in a letter to SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 16:42:55

Republicans are playing a cynical game of “gotcha!” by trying to score points off the Democrats instead of trying to expose and root out institutional corruption and rip-offs.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 17:23:10

They won’t because that light would shine both ways.

 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 12:10:50

An investment strategist at China’s $300-billion (U.S.) wealth fund said the world’s third-largest economy now had a say in the exchange rate of the U.S. dollar, which it expects to rise while the yen should fall further.

The comments by Peng Junming, who works in the asset allocation and strategic research department at China Investment Corp, triggered a rally in the U.S. dollar.

“I think the dollar is at its bottom now. There will be very limited space for the dollar to drop further,” he told an academic forum. “The yen is what, I think, has the worst outlook. The yen will continue to drop, unlike the dollar, which will not serve for long as a source of funding carry trades.”

The U.S. dollar rose more than half a yen close to 92.40 yen on the news, then pared gains after Mr. Peng said his speech at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences reflected personal views. The euro slid against the dollar and gold dropped before rebounding slightly.

The market reaction to Mr. Peng’s comments shows the sensitivity to clues on how China and its state fund view the markets.

Comment by yensoy
2010-01-12 17:47:58

Another way of saying that USD interest rates will shoot up because China will hold back buying USTs, which will raise the USD.

 
 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 12:15:39

Listening to NPR on this fella’s book:
Priceless The Myth of Fair Value
by William Poundstone

“That price has a hypnotic effect: the profit margin of the 99 Cents Only store is twice that of Wal-Mart. Why do text messages cost money, while e-mails are free? Why do jars of peanut butter keep getting smaller in order to keep the price the “same”? The answer is simple: prices are a collective hallucination.”

“Price consultants” advise retailers on how to convince consumers to pay more for less, and negotiation coaches offer similar advice for businesspeople…”

I wasn’t aware that CA & ME are the top RED states… :-)

http://www.utahgasprices.com/Price_By_County.aspx

Comment by yensoy
2010-01-12 17:52:37

SMS (text messages) charges are a huge scam by the telecom companies.

It’s time we had a new entrant in the wireless business. I really hope China Mobile opens shop in the US. Even with a monopoly in China their call charges are a fifth of rates here.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 12:27:03
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 17:27:46

Is this a great country or WHAT?!

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 17:45:29

Cheney-Shrub Legacy Effect #4: “Leave behind after our x8 years in Office, the worst US Economy in 80 years, the GOP will thank us in 1 3/4 years” ;-)

Cheney-Shrub: “We want him to succeed as President…we really do!” :-)

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 13:18:17

Tax break gives KB Home profits
Washington Business Journal - 1-12-10

KB Home, which plans to resume home building in the Washington market after pulling out in 2008, reported its first profits since 2007, after new tax breaks recently given to home builders.

The Los Angeles-based builder’s revenue fell after selling its houses for less than a year ago.

KB Home had fourth quarter net income of $100.7 million, or $1.31 per share, compared to a net loss of $307.3 million, or $3.96 per share in the same quarter a year ago. Total revenue was $674.6 million, down 27 percent.

The company recorded a $191.7 million income tax benefit during the quarter, related to recently enacted tax legislation that extended the permitted carryback period for offsetting operating losses from two years to five years. The company posted a pre-tax loss for the quarter of $91 million.

Orders increased 12 percent during the quarter, thanks to a decline in cancelations. The number of home sales completed fell 22 percent, and its average sales price was $203,400, down from $232,200 a year ago.

Comment by aNYCdj
2010-01-12 16:48:50

Of course they Won’t increase the amount people can deduct for stock losses from $3K a year.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 13:19:49

NYC Office Space for Rent Increases 38%.

Jan. 12 (Bloomberg) — Manhattan has 38 percent more office space for rent than a year ago as Wall Street job cuts and a weak economy dampen demand, Cushman & Wakefield Inc. said. The vacancy rate in the fourth quarter was unchanged from the third.

Available space totaled 43.8 million square feet at the end of 2009, compared with 31.8 million a year earlier, the New York-based brokerage said today in a report. That’s equivalent to 11.1 percent of Manhattan’s office space, the same as at the end of September, according to Cushman.

“We’re calling this close to the bottom,” said Joseph Harbert, Cushman’s chief operating officer for the New York region. “Rents will go down a bit from here, vacancies will go up a bit, but you won’t see any dramatic movements on either of those fronts in the next nine months.”

Comment by Spokaneman
2010-01-12 15:23:25

From a post on Patrick.net, citing the Phoenix on-line business paper:

“The Valley’s real estate boom-and-bust cycle left an almost unimaginable 80 million square feet of excess office, retail and industrial space on the rental market at the close of 2009 - the rough equivalent of 1,600 football fields.”

That boggles my mind!

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 13:26:30

Jan. 11, 2010, 2:23 p.m. EST

New York AG Cuomo seeks bonus data on bailed-out banks

By Ronald D. Orol, MarketWatch

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - Responding to concerns about record payouts to Wall Street bankers, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo on Monday said he is asking eight of the largest U.S. banks that received bank-bailout dollars for information about their pay and bonus packages for 2009.

Cuomo said he is seeking the data from Bank of America Corp. (BAC 16.27, -0.66, -3.90%) , Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (BK 29.13, +0.11, +0.38%) , Citigroup Inc. (C 3.51, -0.13, -3.44%) , Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS 167.68, -3.88, -2.26%) , J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., (JPM 43.20, -1.33, -2.99%) Morgan Stanley (MS 31.06, -0.99, -3.07%) , State Street Corp. (STT 44.22, -0.14, -0.32%) and Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC 28.05, -0.75, -2.60%)

These institutions received federal dollars as part of the U.S. government’s $700 billion bank-bailout program, known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program. They have since repaid the bailout funds.

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 13:28:06

Talk about a screwed up country…

Family shut out of their ‘dream home’ by gang of gipsies who moved in over Christmas ~ 12th January 2010 Daily Mail ~ (UK)

With the building works nearly over, Julian and Samantha Mosedale and their three children were looking forward to moving into their ‘dream home’.

But now their future has been thrown into doubt - after a gang of Romanian gipsies beat them to it and took over the £285,000 property.

To add insult to injury, when the law-abiding couple questioned the squatters’ right to be in Britain, police told them that they were being ‘racist’.

The unwanted guests entered the three-bedroom terrace house over Christmas, changed the locks and began moving in furniture.

Mr Mosedale, an illustrator, and his wife, a catalogue manager, both 45, had moved out of the house in Tottenham, North London, in July 2007 while extensive structural and renovation work was completed.

They rented another property, and regularly visited the house to project manage the work.

But, after spending Christmas visiting relatives in Essex, they were horrified when they next visited the house on January 3 to find the squatters had moved in.

They now fear they could soon be homeless because they can only afford to foot the dual monthly cost of rent and mortgage payments until March.

The couple also claim the police have left them ‘feeling like criminals’ even though they are the innocent victims - because they dared to wonder if the squatters were illegally claiming benefits from their home.

Mrs Mosedale , whose three sons are 10, eight, and five, said: ‘We called the police as soon as we found out they were in there. An officer suggested I was racist when I asked if they were Romanians, and did they have a legal right to be in this country.

‘We are hard-working citizens yet get treated like criminals when our home is stolen. This whole thing is making me feel constantly sick. All we want to do is get on with our lives.

‘We feel let down by the law, by government, and by the police, in fact all the authorities that one would expect to protect society.

‘The house had builders in it while the renovations were being done. It was only in the last couple of months that it was left completely empty.

‘Our lawyers don’t know how long it will take us to get them out and the stress is really getting to the whole family.

‘The kids are upset at the idea that other children are playing with their toys in the garden. Our son Jake is old enough to understand what is going on and he is finding it difficult to sleep.

Comment by Carl Morris
2010-01-12 15:11:54

Straight out of “The Simpsons”.

 
Comment by Spokaneman
2010-01-12 15:32:08

There was a situaton in Spokane last fall where a homeowner allowed a friend of his son to temporatly occupy a guest quarter in his detached garage. Pretty soon the “tenant” had his girlfriend and kids living with them. THe HO asked the “tenant” to leave and the request was refused. The cops refused to get involved and told the HO that if he moved the guys stuff out it would be criminal trespass. The HO finally had to begin the eviction process which in WA is a timeconsuming and expensive process.

The local press had a field day with it.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-01-12 17:32:31

In Texas, being in someone’s house without their permission would be trespassing and you only need a shotgun to fix the problem.

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 13:32:25

“Well it seems that they have taken that message to heart, and so they changed the way that they are counting jobs as “created or saved.” Only, now it may be even worse”. Neal Boortz

ABC’s Jake Tapper reports:

In a little-noticed December 18, 2009 memo from Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag the Obama administration is changing the way stimulus jobs are counted.

The memo, first noted by ProPublica, says that those receiving stimulus funds no longer have to say whether a job has been saved or created …

In other words, if the project is being funded with stimulus dollars - even if the person worked at that company or organization before and will work the same place afterwards - that’s a stimulus job.

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 13:47:26

So why didn’t this loser get the job done in his 4 years?

Corzine Condemns ‘Too Damn High’ New Jersey Taxes as He Exits

Jan. 12 (Bloomberg) — New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine, making his valedictory speech to lawmakers, said the most critical issue facing them and his successor boils down to this: “Everyone’s property taxes are too damn high.”

In his final State of the State address, seven days before he cedes the office to Republican Christopher Christie, Corzine expressed disappointment that he was unable to win another four years in office. He leaves with a record 58 percent disapproval rating by state voters, according to a Fairleigh Dickinson University poll today.

The former chairman of Goldman, Sachs & Co., who pledged to use his Wall Street expertise to end budget deficits and lower the highest property taxes in the nation, urged politicians to “think not just about the next election.”

“Until we reform our state’s antiquated structure for providing local government services,” state leaders are “never going to get the job done,” Corzine said.

Comment by aNYCdj
2010-01-12 16:58:53

Imagine him cracking down on Camden Patterson Newark schools, and the animals and thugs who ruin the city and run the cities into the ground and the state ends up paying for it.

That’s my take he was too white for the job.

————
So why didn’t this loser get the job done in his 4 years?

Comment by james
2010-01-12 18:58:40

It is a legal quagmire to try to take down those systems. A easier and possibly better choice is cut taxes and cut funding even more. People hate getting the taxes raised so makes it a tough thing to take politically.

That would firm up your base in the burbs.

I realize this would be tough on the kids there but other choices are probably worse. Maximum cost for minimal return.

Also have to change a bunch of the state requirements too. We used to have a fine education system with out them. So, no reason we can’t return to that.

This from a former Jerseyite.

Comment by aNYCdj
2010-01-12 20:39:22

james:

Unless we force people to read write and speak English, we will never return to making America a strong nation.

It is the communication skills that have destroyed communities….just look at any story on jails whether from the far left or right and one thing that sticks out, is 90% speak Ghetto.

Force prisoners to speak English to get a shot at parole or add more time for wanting to stay in the ghetto

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 14:39:07

When botox Pelosi flies she leaves the biggest carbon foot print a moonbat can…

(CBS) Few would argue with the U.S. having a presence at the Copenhagen Climate Summit. But wait until you hear what we found about how many in Congress got all-expense paid trips to Denmark on your dime.

CBS investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports that cameras spotted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi at the summit. She called the shots on who got to go. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, and embattled Chairman of the Tax Committee Charles Rangel were also there.

They were joined by 17 colleagues: Democrats: Waxman, Miller, Markey, Gordon, Levin, Blumenauer, DeGette, Inslee, Ryan, Butterfield, Cleaver, Giffords, and Republicans: Barton, Upton, Moore Capito, Sullivan, Blackburn and Sensenbrenner.

That’s not the half of it. But finding out more was a bit like trying to get the keys to Ft. Knox. Many referred us to Speaker Pelosi who wouldn’t agree to an interview. Her office said it “will comply with disclosure requirements” but wouldn’t give us cost estimates or even tell us where they all stayed.

Senator Inhofe (R-OK) is one of the few who provided us any detail. He attended the summit on his own for just a few hours, to give an “opposing view.”

“They’re going because it’s the biggest party of the year,” Sen. Inhofe said. “The worst thing that happened there is they ran out of caviar.”

Our investigation found that the congressional delegation was so large, it needed three military jets: two 737’s and a Gulfstream Five — up to 64 passengers — traveling in luxurious comfort.

Add senators and staff, most of whom flew commercial, and we counted at least 101 Congress-related attendees. All for a summit that failed to deliver a global climate deal.

As a perk, some took spouses, since they could snag an open seat on a military jet or share a room at no extra cost to taxpayers. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) was there with her husband. Rep. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) was also there with her husband. Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA) took his wife, as did Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI). Congressman Barton — a climate change skeptic — even brought along his daughter.

Until required filings are made in the coming weeks, we can only figure bits and pieces of the cost to you.

# Three military jets at $9,900 per hour - $168,000 just in flight time.
# Dozens flew commercial at up to $2,000 each.
(CBS)

# 321 hotel nights booked - the bulk at Copenhagen’s five-star Marriott.
# Meals add tens of thousands more.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 16:45:49

“That’s not the half of it…” :-)

Boy, you can say that again wmbz…what size you estimate is Cheney-Shrub’s Blood & Treasure carbon foot print for 7 years in Iraq & Afghanistan?

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 15:20:10

Raleigh appraisal company ALA Inc. files for Chapter 7 liquidation
Triangle Business Journal -

Raleigh appraisal company ALA Inc., which formerly was known as Morgan & Company Inc., has filed for Chapter 7 liquidation.

The firm, run by Winston T. Morgan, made the filing Dec. 30 in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. The company listed assets of $2,700 compared to liabilities of $2.4 million.

Bankruptcy attorney Douglas Wickham says that ALA invested in a Durham residential land development deal that went south, a turn of events that eventually resulted in the need for the bankruptcy filing. He adds that Morgan is continuing to run an appraisal business under a different corporate entity.

According to the bankruptcy filing, ALA posted gross sales from appraisals of $173,029 in 2009, compared to gross sales from appraisals of $206,400 in 2008.

The local residential home industry has been hit hard by the bursting of the housing bubble nationally. Another recent casualty was Willow Spring-based custom residential builder Promise Homes LLC, which filed for liquidation on Dec. 31.

The company, which was headed up by Stephen Cochran, primarily built high-end houses in the $500,000 price range in southern Wake County, according to bankruptcy attorney Paul Winborne Documents filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina show that Promise Homes had assets of $2.03 million and liabilities of $2.36 million.

 
Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-01-12 15:48:45

Hmmmm. That’s interesting. Just checked the bankrate rating on one of my local banks just cuz I hadn’t done it in a while.

Significantly lower ratios than last time. I’d go as far as to say the memo used some extreme phraseology. Feeling a little more confident that shadow inventory’s out there locally.

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 16:13:04

Bill Bonner, who has today’s reckoning from Bethesda, Maryland…

Poor Obama. The man is in way over his head. And what can he do? Few people understand what is going on in the economy…and none of them work for the Obama administration, as near as we can tell. The only one who seemed to be on the ball was his advisor, Paul Volcker. But Volcker got edged out by Larry Summers, a man with a long history of bad ideas on economic matters.

Summers is a stalwart member of that very special club - modern economists. Never has an unarmed professional group done more damage to a society than Summers and his colleagues.

“We cannot and will not accept any speed limit on American growth,” said Summers in a 1995 speech, rejecting the idea of higher interest rates to cool speculation. By 2000, the economy with no speed limit had smashed into an abutment. But Summers never figured out what the problem was. He was too busy wrecking a great university. He went on to apply the same ‘no speed limit’ philosophy to Harvard, where his building program was so costly the university years will probably never recover from it.

Ben Bernanke gives no hint that he has any idea of what is going on either. He maintains that modern central banking can’t see when economies are getting into trouble. But when they do…he knows just what to do to fix it.

What kind of strange GPS system is this, dear reader? It failed to tell us where we were before we ran off the cliff… But now, we’re going to use it to find our way home. Good luck!

But who worries now? We’re rolling along…convinced that trouble is behind us. Recovery is on the way; that’s what the signs say.

But wait…

Joblessness at a 26-year high, and rising….

Consumer credit just took the biggest monthly drop ever…it’s fallen 10 months in a row.

Nearly half of Florida’s mortgages are underwater…

Hey…what a recovery!

But the stock market doesn’t seem to care. Or notice.

The Dow rose 45 points yesterday. Investors seem to think that businesses are going to make a lot of money in the years ahead. How? How much stuff can you sell to unemployed people? But why else would investors pay 100 times earnings for a share?

The current price/earnings ratio is a subject of much discussion. Earnings collapsed in the depression. Prices did not. So if you look just at current earnings you come to a P/E ratio in the 100+ range. That means investors pay $100 for every dollar’s worth of earnings. If they intend to earn their money back - and nothing changes - they’ll wait a century to break even.

But earnings are expected to go up. So Robert Shiller used a 10-year moving average to compute earnings…smoothing them out to a “normal” level. Still, he says, the S&P 500 is overvalued by about 27%.

The point is, stocks are expensive. So, you have to wonder: what is going on? Are stock market investors really such optimists?

Or, is the federal government manipulating stock prices? It is spending trillions of dollars to give people the impression that things are getting back to normal. Why not spend a few billion more to manipulate stock prices?

We don’t know. The feds have shown themselves willing to do any fool thing…but rigging the stock market? Who knows?

We’ve got to reckon with what we’ve got. And what we’ve got is a stock market that is either manipulated…or delusional.

Stocks could only be worth current prices if this were a normal recession. But if this were a normal recession, it would be over by now. Stocks would be moving up in anticipation of the next boom phase. But this is not a normal recession. And it hasn’t come to an end. New jobs aren’t being created. Consumer credit is not expanding. And the only prices that are going up are the prices subject to speculation.

The real reason stocks are so expensive (assuming the market isn’t rigged) is that this is the beginning of a depression, not the end of one. At the beginning, people don’t quite believe it.

“We’re climbing out of a nasty recession,” said a financial expert interviewed on the radio this morning. “And we’re all happy to put this thing behind us as soon as possible.”

Stocks are high because people think they can ‘put this thing behind them.’ They can’t imagine that the depression will last for 5…10…maybe 15 more years. Nor do they realize that the US economy is permanently impaired…that the companies traded on Wall Street will have a very hard time earning profits in the years ahead…nor that the average American family may have reached the height of its wealth in 1973!

The disappointment will come…then the disillusionment…then the disgust…then the despair. It will be like walking down a staircase…each step heavier…deeper…and more depressing the last. And with each step, stocks will fall. Investors will begin to see things in a new way. And at the bottom, a whole new outlook will be common:

“America is finished as an economic power,” people will say. “Incomes are going down - forever; we can’t compete with the Chinese. Stocks were dreadfully overpriced; now they are cheap…but who would want to buy them?”

It may not happen like that. But somehow, some day…stocks will once again trade at low P/E ratios… Below 10…maybe down to 5. Then, they will be bargains.

How will you know when it is time to buy again? When you no longer want to.

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 16:20:10

Labor angry over Obama-backed insurance tax ~~ Jan 12,

WASHINGTON (AP) - Labor leaders are pushing hard on President Barack Obama and Senate Democrats to drop a proposed new tax on high-value health insurance plans, warning of political consequences.

The White House has indicated the tax may change so it hits fewer workers - but it’s not going away.

A Monday evening meeting at the White House between Obama and about a dozen heads of the country’s biggest labor unions capped a day when two union leaders fired broadsides at Obama and Senate Democrats over their plans to pay for overhauling the nation’s health care system with a tax union leaders fear could hurt their workers.

The 40 percent tax would fall on employer health plans worth more than $8,500 for an individual or $23,000 for a family. Although Obama terms them “Cadillac” plans, union leaders say numerous working-class Americans who’ve negotiated good benefits in exchange for lesser pay would be hurt.

The president of the AFL-CIO, Richard Trumka, warned that Democrats risk catastrophic election defeats similar to 1994 if they fail to come up with a health bill labor likes.

“A bad bill could have that kind of effect - a place where people sit at home” - as happened in 1994, when Democrats lost 54 House seats and eight in the Senate, costing them control of Congress, Trumka told reporters.

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 16:27:21

Schwarzenegger budget ax would fall heavily on poor ~~Tue Jan 12, 2010

* California’s welfare-to-work program on chopping block

* Health programs for poor, elderly and disabled at risk

* At least 200,000 children could lose low-cost insurance

LOS ANGELES, Jan 12 (Reuters) - The latest budget plan from California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger would force 200,000 children off low-cost medical insurance, end in-home care for 350,000 infirm and elderly citizens and slash income assistance to hundreds of thousands more.

And that’s the best-case scenario under Schwarzenegger’s prescription for filling the state’s $19.9 billion deficit.

Refusing to consider broad tax hikes, he is relying mostly on $8.5 billion in reduced expenditures including drastic cuts to health and social spending that has long made California one of the leading U.S. states in providing help to the needy.

Schwarzenegger also is counting on the U.S. government contributing nearly $7 billion that he says is due California because of various federal mandates.

If federal money fails to materialize, the governor’s plan would trigger deeper cuts that would dismantle entire programs, including the state’s welfare-to-work system, CalWorks.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-01-12 16:32:28

A 7.0 earthquake just hit Haiti. Wonder how many more “seismic events” are in the cards. For our California HBBers, I hope you’re well stocked with emergency supplies just in case.

Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 19:59:40

6.8 in Eureka, 5.8 in San Diego, 7.0 in Haiti

As Laker announcer “Chick Hearn” use to say: “The jello is jigglin’…”

 
 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 16:39:03

Major earthquake off Haiti causes hospital to collapse
A magnitude 7.3 earthuake hit the impoverished country of Haiti on Tuesday, the U.S. Geological Survey reported.

The epicenter of the quake, which was initially reported a magnitude 7.0 off the coast, was located inland, six miles west of Carrefour, and just 10 miles from the capital Port-au-Prince.

An AFP correspondent in the nearby town of Petionville said one three-story building had been toppled, and a tractor was already at the scene trying to dig out victims as people fled onto the streets in panic.

A hospital collapsed near the epicentre, and cries of people within the structure were reported by witnesses.

The quake prompted a tsunami watch for Haiti, Cuba, the Bahamas and the Dominican Republic, the Pacific Tsunami Center said.

A major earthquake, of magnitude 7 or higher, is capable of causing widespread and heavy damage. There was no immediate report of casualties.

Haiti is the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere.

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 16:48:13

Google to Stop Censoring China Results, May Shut Site (Update1)

Jan. 12 (Bloomberg) — Google Inc., owner of the world’s most popular search engine, plans to stop censoring results on its Chinese site, Google.cn, a move that may lead to shutting down the service.

The company said it will discuss the plan with Chinese authorities and is willing to close the site, according to a blog post today. Google also said it has evidence that an attack on its China Web site was aimed at accessing Gmail accounts of Chinese human-rights activists.

“Over the next few weeks, we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all,” the Mountain View, California-based company said on its blog. “We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.”

 
Comment by wmbz
2010-01-12 16:57:26

Venezuelans Rush for TVs on Devaluation, Colgate Hit (Update3)

Jan. 12 (Bloomberg) — Venezuelan consumers are rushing to buy flat screen televisions before prices jump, while U.S. companies including Colgate-Palmolive Co. brace for profit declines after President Hugo Chavez devalued the currency.

Shoppers picked through half-empty shelves at the Game-Zone electronics store in Caracas yesterday after a surge in demand drove up sales 70 percent over the weekend, said salesman Xavier Manrique. Colgate, the world’s largest toothpaste-maker, forecast a charge of up to 6 cents a share each quarter this year and Clorox Co., the biggest bleach maker, said it expects as much as $30 million in Venezuelan currency-related losses.

Chavez’s threats to seize businesses that raise prices following the first devaluation in five years may deepen shortages by making companies hesitate to restock, said Juan Pablo Fuentes, an economist at Moody’s Economy.com. He forecasts inflation could reach 60 percent, the highest since 1996 and more than double the government’s forecast.

“It’s going to be a tough year,” Fuentes said in a telephone interview from West Chester, Pennsylvania. “The devaluation has an immediate impact on consumers. You’re going to see a sharp contraction in consumption, which is the main driver for GDP.”

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 18:01:37

The ‘lil commies have a keen sense of “tolerance” when it comes to dissent of their Gov’t “goals”…it’s a good thing that we have them as a “trading partner” ;-)

“Google said that a primary goal of the attackers was accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human right activists, but that the attack also targeted 20 other large companies in the finance, technology, media and chemical sectors.”

“In a blog posting by David Drummond, the corporate development and chief legal officer, Google said that it had found a “highly sophisticated and targeted attack on our corporate infrastructure originating from China.”

Google, Citing Cyber Attack, Threatens to Exit China:

NY Times By MIGUEL HELFT and JOHN MARKOFF Published: January 12, 2010

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 20:12:49

It’s not “more” laws, just more deputies, with “real” bullets. ;-)

State bar closes mortgage-aid firms
January 12th, 2010, by Mathew Padilla OC Register

The California State Bar said today it shut down the loan modification businesses of two men for allegedly lying to consumers about being supervised by attorneys. The bar, which acted with the Orange County Superior Court in this case, has worked with other state and local officials to crack down on companies promising homeowner aid but not delivering it.

The bar alleges Curtis Melone of Huntington Beach and Christopher Fox of Redondo Beach promised to help homeowners facing foreclosure keep their properties but did nothing.

The duo operated under the names Guardian Credit Services, Green Credit Solutions, Green Credit Services, Erickson Law Group, Green Credit Law and PacWest Funding. A Web search indicates the companies were based primarily in Foothill Ranch and Irvine.

Here’s more from the bar:

After working with the California Department of Justice, the California Department of Real Estate and the Orange County District Attorney’s Office, State Bar investigators and prosecutors seized client files, terminated phone and computer services and posted notices to clients and the public about the shutdown. All officers, principals and employees of the businesses were ordered to cease and desist from holding themselves out as attorneys.

Since last March, the State Bar has aggressively sought to stop loan modification fraud by lawyers and to shut down the offices of people offering foreclosure services who represent themselves as lawyers. Thirteen attorneys have resigned in the wake of investigations by the State Bar Task Force on Loan Modification and six businesses have been closed.

Section 6126.3 of the Business and Professions Code gives authority to a superior court, on its own motion or upon application of the State Bar, to assume jurisdiction of the business of a person who is not a lawyer. Assumption of a law practice by a Superior Court is based upon the court finding that a person has engaged in the practice of law without being an active member of the State Bar or otherwise authorized to practice in California and that the interest of a client or interested person or entity will be prejudiced if the court does not assume jurisdiction.

 
Comment by Hwy50ina49Dodge
2010-01-12 20:40:52

California might become the #1 producer with this agricultural “commodity” ;-)

There’s nothing like the smell of “revenue” up in Sacramento these days.

Key vote supports recreational marijuana use:

Wyatt Buchanan, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

“AB390 would allow possession, sale and cultivation of marijuana for people over 21, and impose a $50-an-ounce sales tax, much like taxes on tobacco and alcohol. The California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control would be tasked with regulation.”

“The vote in Sacramento comes as state lawmakers in New Jersey on Monday made that state one of the few on the East Coast to approve medicinal marijuana use. Up north in Olympia, the Washington State Legislature will consider two bills today to remove state criminal penalties associated with marijuana.”

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-12 23:23:46

Didn’t another form of prohibition end during the last Great Depression? I am wondering if there is a parallel — were they running low on revenues back in the 1930s, and thinking then as now of how much a sin tax might help plug budget holes?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-13 00:05:47

Academic economists are closing rank around BB, as he is one of their own…

* The Wall Street Journal
* JANUARY 13, 2010

Bernanke Challenged on Rates’ Role in Bust

By JON HILSENRATH

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke says low interest rates engineered by the Fed in the early 2000s aren’t to blame for the housing boom and bust. But he hasn’t convinced fellow economists.

Two surveys conducted by The Wall Street Journal this week found many economists believe low rates did contribute to the bubble.

In a monthly survey of mainly Wall Street and other business economists, 42 said low interest rates were partly to blame for the housing boom while 12 sided with Mr. Bernanke and said they weren’t. Academic economists who specialize in monetary policy were split in a separate survey: 13 said low interest rates helped cause the housing bubble; 14 said they didn’t.

It is more than an academic argument. Fed officials have been trying to understand what went wrong last decade to avoid repeating it. In addition, lawmakers are weighing whether to give Mr. Bernanke a second term and whether to bolster or restrain the Fed’s power as a financial regulator.

The Fed pushed its benchmark federal funds interest rate — at which banks lend to each other overnight — to 1% in 2003 when Alan Greenspan was Fed chairman and Mr. Bernanke was a member of the Fed board. With the economy weak and deflation a concern, the Fed pushed rates up gradually beginning in 2004. Mr. Bernanke became chairman in 2006.

Mr. Bernanke laid out his defense of Fed policy in a speech to the American Economic Association last week, acknowledging that interest rates were very low but adding that policy “does not appear to have been inappropriate.” Other factors — notably an explosion of exotic mortgages and a flood of cash coming into the U.S. from abroad — were the crucial drivers of the housing bubble, he said. “Regulatory and supervisory policies, rather than monetary policies, would have been more effective means of addressing the run-up in house prices,” he said.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-13 00:18:20

Can anyone suggest how I can lay claim to my personal share of the bailout?

* OPINION: BUSINESS WORLD
* JANUARY 12, 2010, 9:33 P.M. ET

Bashing Bankers Is a Political Duty
But don’t overlook the fact that taxpayers are making out on the bailout too.

* By HOLMAN W. JENKINS, JR.

If you would know why bankers are enjoying a large and controversial deluge of annual bonuses, look no further than the monthly report of the New York State Comptroller’s Office. The economy may be in the dumps, but Wall Street enjoyed record profits of $50 billion in the first nine months of last year—”nearly two and a half times the previous annual peak in 2000.”

“Profitability,” adds the state of New York, “has soared because revenues rose while the costs of doing business—particularly interest costs—declined” (in other words, thank you Federal Reserve).

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-01-13 00:23:25

Does Vegas offer odds on how long Geithner has left in office before he gets the golden shove towards a lucrative Wall Street career? The future brazillians he will make on Wall Street make his current stint as the Obamanomics Team’s designated piñata seem a small price to pay.

* REVIEW & OUTLOOK
* JANUARY 12, 2010, 11:17 P.M. ET

The Geithner AIG Story
Those emails and ’systemic risk.’

Timothy Geithner is back in piñata mode, with House Oversight Chairman Edolphus Towns asking him to testify next week about bailout giant AIG. By all means Members should swing away at the Treasury Secretary, but only if they focus on the right questions.

The trigger for the Towns hearing is the release of emails between the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and AIG in November and December 2008. The New York Fed urged AIG to limit disclosure of its deal to buy out derivative trading partners at 100 cents on the dollar. But since AIG went ahead and disclosed it anyway, this line of inquiry doesn’t get to the heart of the taxpayer interest.

Likewise, asking if Mr. Geithner helped write the emails to AIG will simply allow him to continue avoiding the bigger questions: Why did he believe AIG could not fail? Why should he receive more authority to declare firms systemically important, when he will still not fully explain his previous multibillion-dollar judgments in the name of countering “systemic risk”?

Mr. Geithner was president of the New York Fed when it began sending what has become $182.3 billion in taxpayer assistance to AIG in September 2008. Much of this money was used to meet collateral calls from big banks that had bought AIG’s credit default swaps. AIG had resisted handing over more collateral. But once Mr. Geithner was in charge of AIG, the cash flowed freely to these bank counterparties.

The Fed and AIG ultimately bought the underlying securities at par. This was not only much more than the counterparties might have received from a bankrupt AIG, but even a healthy AIG would never have handed over so much cash in the midst of a panic in which cash was king. Mr. Geithner’s New York Fed demanded the 100-cents on the dollar deal for these counterparties, and it demanded that their identities be kept secret. The Journal nonetheless reported this sweet deal and the names of some beneficiaries, including Goldman Sachs, in early November 2008, but taxpayers had to wait months before AIG finally released the full story.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post

  • The Housing Bubble Blog
  • The Housing Bubble Blog