March 15, 2010

A Cascading Effect Of Uncertainty And Doubt

The Nashua Telegraph reports on New Hampshire. “In terms of home foreclosures, Scrooge took a holiday in December, but in January, he came back strong. The state saw 352 foreclosure deeds in January, a record for that month and the second most ever, just seven behind the 359 of last October, according to statistics compiled by the New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority. ‘This level of foreclosure activity may reflect the possible deferral by lenders of foreclosure proceedings during the holiday period, and it certainly offers evidence of the continued economic distress of many New Hampshire home owners,’ according to the authority’s report.”

“Banks will hold off on foreclosing in December for two reasons: They’re hesitant to foreclose during the holidays, and December can be a tough month for scheduling, said Jane Law, director of communications for the New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority. ‘That has happened in the past, particularly by some of the larger lenders,’ Law said.”

“Nashua Realtor Paul LaFlamme said he handled two foreclosures in January, which he called a ‘heavy’ number for one month. And there might be more coming, said LaFlamme, whose business includes short sales. Some banks have approached LaFlamme to get his opinion on the market value of properties, an indication that the lenders might be preparing to take ownership of the properties, he said.”

The Union Leader in New Hampshire. “There were 505 bankruptcy filings in February, a historic high for that month in New Hampshire. It’s the highest number since the bankruptcy laws were changed in 2005, and comes after a record January, when 381 bankruptcies were filed here. Sandra Kuhn, vice president of FamilyLegal law firm in Concord, isn’t surprised that bankruptcy filings are at an all-time high. These days, many of her clients are unemployed and unable to find work. ‘They’re living paycheck to paycheck, and when they don’t have that paycheck, they’re spiraling out of control,’ she said.”

“Meanwhile, new mortgage data indicate the problem still may be getting worse. The latest National Delinquency Survey by the Mortgage Bankers Association found that delinquencies continue to rise in New Hampshire, with 9 percent of all home loans past due in the fourth quarter of 2009. (Rates were not seasonally adjusted.) In sheer numbers, 10,674 prime loans and 5,446 subprime loans in New Hampshire were delinquent at the end of last year, according to the MBA.”

“The psychological aspects of foreclosure and bankruptcy can seem even more difficult for many these days, according to Kuhn. While some national experts say the economy is improving, folks who are still unemployed or losing their homes aren’t seeing any improvement. Kuhn would like to see a moratorium on mortgage payments — a kind of ‘breathing room’ — for those who are jobless.”

“‘It’s really, really hard if you’re unemployed, to be able sometimes to pay your mortgage,’ she said. ‘The thing is, nobody’s getting jobs.’”

The Times Argus in Vermont. “The recession continues to make its presence felt in Vermont as the number of homeowners facing foreclosure jumped 17 percent last year. There were 1,928 foreclosures filed in the state in 2009 compared to 1,639 the prior year, according to the Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration. With the exception of Rutland County, foreclosures increased in all 14 counties in the state last year.”

“The number of calls to the Mortgage Assistance Program hotline would indicate that more foreclosures are likely, at least in the near term, said Thomas Candon, deputy commissioner of the Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration. Some distressed homeowners are working with lenders to modify the terms of their mortgage using a voluntary loan modification program. But Candon said a successful outcome for many homeowners is questionable.”

“‘We’ve had people actually calls us, get into a loan modification, come out of it, go back into another one,’ said Candon, in pointing out the difficulty.”

The Warwick Beacon in Rhode Island. “Following the lead of its neighbors, Warwick gave first passage to an ordinance that city council members hope will work to stem foreclosures in the city at Monday evening’s meeting. ‘When I checked the number of foreclosures I was simply shocked and I said to myself ‘something needs to be done about this,’ said Helen Taylor (Ward-3). ‘This forces the banks and the lenders to sit down with the homeowners to negotiate with them to refinance or lower the price of the monthly payments that they’re required to pay.’”

“The process does allow for foreclosures to take place, but only after a good faith effort at resolution has occurred. Bill White, president of Coastway Community Bank, says that’s already happening. He observed it is not in the bank’s interest to foreclose, as the bank ends up selling the property at less than what it is worth. ‘When talking about some of the larger out of state banks maybe they aren’t going through the process, but we bend over backward. Where people have had extenuating circumstances we modify payments. It’s our best bet to get paid,’ he said.”

“‘I don’t see it as a productive step,’ he added. White said legislators are ‘making judgment we haven’t done that (attempted to keep people in their homes) and we have. I’m sure it is well intentioned but speaking for Coastway it misses the mark.’”

“Despite voting for the ordinance, councilman Ray Gallucci (Ward-8), said he believes it will be difficult to enforce. ‘I think it’s a good piece of legislation, but if we can’t enforce it, what good will it really do. I’m hearing Providence is having some trouble enforcing it,’ said Gallucci.”

The Boston Globe in Massachusetts. “Massachusetts could face a second wave of foreclosures as tens of thousands of distressed and bank-owned properties hit the market, slowing the state’s nascent housing recovery, officials from the Massachusetts Housing Partnership said. Clark Ziegler, executive director of the state’s quasi-public, affordable housing agency, said there are about 64,000 distressed properties in so-called shadow inventory poised to go on the market because they have delinquent mortgages, are in foreclosure, or already are owned by a lender.”

“‘The report is not warning of the ‘next big crisis,’ Ziegler said, but is a reminder that the housing market still a long way from recovery. ‘The reality is that there are more [foreclosed properties] to come, and it will stretch out how long it takes the recovery to play out,’ Ziegler said. ‘It is a cautionary tale.’”

“Alan Clayton-Matthews, a professor of public policy at Northeastern University, doesn’t believe shadow inventory will have a big impact locally. He said shadow inventory has been an issue for a while. ‘If this were a problem, it would derail the recovery in housing. We would have seen its effects by now,’ Clayton-Matthews said.”

“But Barry Bluestone, dean of the School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs at Northeastern University, said he was alarmed to see a recent surge in auctions of foreclosed homes, which can bring down prices especially in hard-hit towns. The number of published auction announcements tracked by Warren Group jumped in January by 81.5 percent to 2,385 compared with 1,314 in the same month in 2009. ‘The number of auctions is off the chart,’ Bluestone said. ‘It can have the effect of continuing to depress prices just as they are continuing to come back.’”

The Asbury Park Press in New Jersey. “The total value of properties in the township has decreased by about 7.5 percent, from $6.16 billion to about $5.7 billion, following the township-wide reassessment completed in December. The reassessment was intended to bring valuations in the township closer to market-rate figures, after Manalapan lost nearly $300,000 in legal fees and judgments in 360 lost tax challenges last year.”

“The average township home is now assessed at about $376,900, a 12 percent decrease from last year’s figure, $428,480. But the new valuation won’t be used on local and county tax bills until after 2010 municipal, school, fire and other budgets are adopted, township Chief Financial Officer Patricia Addario said. ‘(The reassessment) is not necessarily good news, because the value is irrelevant until you determine what the rate is,’ said Alan Ginsberg, an accountant who saw the assessment on his single-family Wildflower Court Colonial dip by about 13 percent.”

“Gov. Chris Christie’s looming budget cuts will put the brakes on an already slow economy, but the short-term pain will make New Jersey more competitive, Joel Naroff, an economist, said Thursday. ‘The issue was not the pain, but how to spread the pain,’ Naroff said. ‘We now have a governor who intends to inflict a major amount of pain across the state. And I congratulate him for that.’”

“Short of the creation of a bubble that rivaled the technology bubble of the 1990s and the housing bubble of the 2000s, consumers will remain stingy and the economy will grow only modestly, Naroff said. ‘I call it a change in strategy from shop ’til you drop to shop ’til you’re tired,’ Naroff said.”

“It means the state can’t count on a very big increase in tax revenue, leaving the state government faced with slashing expenses — a move that won’t be confined to the public sector, he said. ‘Everybody has to pay a steep price in the short-term,’ Naroff said after his speech, ’so that in the long-term we can have an economically competitive state.’”

Crain’s New York Business. “Real estate developer Shaya Boymelgreen’s Web site proclaims his finance business is ‘built on a solid foundation.’ He might wish to revisit that statement after federal regulators seized LibertyPointe Bank, an institution that he helped start and served as chairman. LibertyPointe late Thursday became the first New York City bank to fail in 11 years. For Mr. Boymelgreen, it was just the latest turn of the screw.”

“In January, he was evicted from his corporate headquarters in Brooklyn after the landlord said Mr. Boymelgreen stopped paying rent. Several of his real estate projects are stalled, and he faces a flood of lawsuits alleging everything from failure to repay loans to fraud and negligence, as well as breach of contract related to the construction and sale of two condominium projects.”

“Mr. Boymelgreen branched into banking in 2005, starting LibertyPointe with a partner named Meyer Eichler, the founder a Coney Island Avenue bookstore that bills itself as the world’s largest Judaica store. The idea was the bank would serve Brooklyn’s Orthodox Jewish population. ‘Money is begging us to come out,’ Mr. Eichler told The Brooklyn Paper at the time.”

The Real Deal on New York. “State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo’s office, which regulates the sale of condominiums in New York, has told the developers of the financially-troubled One Madison Park condominium to offer refunds to any buyers that have not closed on their apartments, The Real Deal has learned.”

“Cuomo’s office forced the rescission offers after senior lender Istar Financial filed last month to foreclose on developers Ira Shapiro and Marc Jacobs for allegedly defaulting on five months of interest payments, pledging apartments without the bank’s permission and allowing the building loan to fall out of balance by $63.6 million, according to court documents and legal sources.”

“Such a move would require the developers to refund deposits on more than 40 percent of the 69-unit tower at 23 East 22nd Street, as half of the units are under contract and a dozen of those contracts have closed, according to Department of Finance records.”

The New York Times. “Senate Banking Committee members from both parties said on Wednesday that they had agreed to include in their regulatory overhaul bill a new Office of Research and Analysis that would provide early warnings of possible systemic collapses, Edward Wyatt and Sewell Chan report in The New York Times. By standardizing financial instruments and reporting mechanisms, the agency would give regulators a broader view of the health of participants in the financial markets and the potential for problems to spread. The idea’s supporters say that kind of information was lacking in recent years as the housing bubble burst and troubles spread from firm to firm.”

“‘One of the problems we observed in the recent crisis is that nobody knew who had what,’ said Senator Jack Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat who last month introduced a stand-alone bill to establish a National Institute of Finance. ‘The result was a cascading effect of uncertainty and doubt.’”

From CNN Money. “In the U.S. Senate, the progressives are restless. A handful of them are making it known that Democratic leaders shouldn’t take their votes for granted when it comes to Wall Street reform. ‘I won’t vote for a bill if the banks have control of it,’ said Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio.”

“Brown sits on the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee and is among a group worried that Democrats have given away too much to woo Republican support for the bill. ‘Republicans are doing the bidding of their benefactors, the banks,’ he said.”

“The warnings come as committee Chairman Chris Dodd announced that negotiations with Republicans are taking too long and that he will unveil his own Wall Street reform bill Monday. Though Dodd’s proposal has no Republican support, the Connecticut Democrat said he will incorporate many Republican ideas in the hopes he will win bipartisan support.”

“Two other senators who have expressed deep reservations: Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, and Ted Kaufman, D-Delaware. In remarks on the Senate floor, Kaufman warned that he won’t get behind ‘compromise measures that give only the illusion of change and a false sense of accomplishment.’”

“Sanders said he would vote against a Wall Street reform bill unless it includes an independent consumer regulator and tough new restrictions on banks. ‘The American people are disgusted with the behavior of Wall Street, and they don’t want us to go back to a time when Wall Street had no accountability and no regulation,’ Sanders said.”

“Still another Democratic senator, who asked not to be named, said the influence of banks isn’t limited to senators in just one party. ‘These banking institutions are so powerful, they’re all afraid of taking them on,’ the senator said.”

The Hartford Courant in Connecticut. “Unemployment in Connecticut ticked up slightly to 9 percent in January, the highest in this recession, according to a new report released by the state Department of Labor. The January rate, up from 8.8 percent in December, is the highest number for Connecticut since 1976, but it still is lower than the national rate of 9.7 percent.”

“In a sign of recovery, employers in Connecticut added 2,300 jobs in January — the first time since October that the net job figure increased and only the second time since March 2008. ‘Don’t break open the champagne, but you can open a bottle of beer over that one,’ said economist Nick Perna, a Yale lecturer and economic adviser to Webster Bank.”

“Over the past 12 months, construction had the biggest loss by percentage — 12 percent fewer jobs — and professional and business services lost the most positions, 18,600 over the year. Overall, the state’s economy reached 1,610,400 jobs in January, down by 52,500 from January 2009. The decline since the employment peak in March 2008 was 101,100, or nearly 6 percent of all jobs. ‘There’s a long way to go to regain the jobs that have been lost, Perna said. ‘All the TARP and all the other stuff from out there just kept the bottom from falling out,’ he said.”

“Perna is one of a stable of economists who make forecasts for the Wall Street Journal. That newspaper asked him which of five things was the greatest threat to the economy: scarcity of credit to small and medium-size businesses, losses in commercial real estate, another decline in the housing market, the U.S. deficit and less spending from consumers.”

“His answer: ‘None of the above. The U.S. Congress. And I mean that.’ Perna said the Senate has gone beyond gridlock to ‘armed conflict.’ ‘These people have gotten ideologically constipated,’ he said. “I think we’re now incapable of making reasonable economic policy in Washington.’”

The Norwich Bulletin in Connecticut. “Eastern Connecticut home foreclosures rose last month, with Windham County registering the highest percentage of the state’s eight counties. Windham County foreclosures rose 41 percent to 106 from 75 in January, according to RealtyTra. Windham’s February rate was 32.5 percent higher than the 80 foreclosures in the same month in 2009.”

“New London County foreclosures rose 11 percent to 174 in February from 157 in January. New London’s number was up 39 percent from the 125 in February 2009, RealtyTrac statistics show. The figures made New London the No. 5 county in the foreclosure rate rankings. The head officer of the region’s real estate sellers association wasn’t alarmed by the numbers. ‘Connecticut is in much better shape than the rest of the country,” said John Bolduc, CEO of the Norwich-based Eastern Connecticut Association of Realtors.”

“Connecticut had less of a housing boom than states such as Arizona, California and Florida, meaning the foreclosure problem is not as intense. Bolduc said he expects foreclosures to remain a problem for another year or two. ‘It’ll hang around, but things should get better,’ he said.”

The Wethersfield Post in Connecticut. “With jobs disappearing, unemployment growing and Connecticut facing an ongoing budget nightmare - in an election year - the Spring 2010 issue of ‘The Connecticut Economy: A University of Connecticut Quarterly Review,’ analyzes the state’s grim budget prospects.”

“The Quarterly Review also examines the economic consequences of local policy decisions including zoning controls, taxes, spending and regional cooperation that affect property values and the mix of residential housing. The editors note that Connecticut is an old state and growing older; the 39.4 median age of the state’s population ranks Connecticut as the seventh oldest state in the nation.
So, if Connecticut hopes to replace its aging, retirement-bound baby boomers with a cadre of younger workers, it needs to import them with a mix of challenging jobs, good pay and affordable housing, writes Quarterly Executive Editor Steven Lanza.”

“However, like most towns in other states, Connecticut communities have long used zoning controls to regulate the pace, mix and location of development. Lanza examines whether zoning works at cross purposes with broader public policy objectives, such as attracting young professionals to a rapidly graying state.”

“To shed light on how local policies affect real property values, co-editor Dennis Heffley and UConn economics Ph.D. graduate student Ekaterina Gnedenko apply a novel ‘open city’ model to examine policies including municipal taxes, spending, zoning and regional cooperation that maximize local property values.”

‘They note that ‘if property values reflect not just a town’s site and socioeconomic conditions, but also ‘how the town is run,’ then public officials who seek to enhance property values may be serving the interests of their constituents well.’”




RSS feed | Trackback URI

51 Comments »

Comment by baldwin the bland
2010-03-13 10:07:03

The Boston Globe has its own real estate blogger, Scott Van Voorhis, and he’s responded directly to the above article on Boston area shadow inventory with a rather confusing (or confused, take your pick) post…

False fears of shadow inventory doom

Most of the commenters are taking him to task over how he is defining his terms, and I’m afraid I have to agree with them. FWIW, he tends to be on the bullish side, though not ridiculously so.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-03-13 10:40:07

Newspapers sell too much advertising space to the REIC to ever countenance pissing them off by telling the truth. Most local papers have effectively turned the real estate section commentaries over to local real estate hacks, who can be counted on to faithfully spew the latest NAR propaganda with a local twist.

Comment by Lisa
2010-03-13 10:47:20

“Most local papers have effectively turned the real estate section commentaries over to local real estate hacks, who can be counted on to faithfully spew the latest NAR propaganda with a local twist.”

And how many journalists are FB’s themselves? Small wonder they’re chanting the latest NAR propaganda.

Comment by Bad Chile
2010-03-13 16:32:00

Scott V.H. has admitted so much in his ‘blog’ posts - he is a bonnafide F.B., having undertaken the “buy a 100 year old piece of junk and throw $100,000 at it trying to make it modern” which is common in the Boston metro area.

He is, also quite inconsistent but I suspect it is an act to try and generate viewers. He has perhaps three or four regular posters. I can’t imagine that his blog posts are that well read except for the 60-something boomers counting on their 1960’s era 3/1 never-updated ranch in the Boston suburbs to fund a lavish retirement in Florida.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by DennisN
2010-03-14 02:36:26

Have you seen This Old House’s Roxbury project?

They are renovating a tear-down candidate duplex.

First job: jack up whole house, demolish foundation, install new foundation.

I’ll bet it would have been cheaper to raze it and start over.

 
Comment by oxide
2010-03-14 06:07:30

This Old House is going downhill, it seems. They should do more projects like that Dutch Colonial. That made sense. But the freakizoid barn and the teardown…come on.

What *I* want to see them do is convert a plain-jane ranch into a Tudor cottage. It would be pretty easy. (yeah, I’ve thought about it.)

 
Comment by natalie
2010-03-14 07:57:48

“What *I* want to see them do is convert a plain-jane ranch into a Tudor cottage. It would be pretty easy. (yeah, I’ve thought about it.)”

How is this possible? Tudors are characterized by high ceilings and beautiful wood and tile work by actual craftsmen. Plain-jane ranches are not.

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-03-16 10:01:34

If there is one thing I have “learned” from Bubbleheads, it is that all home renovations are “easy” and make a house “worth” far more than the amount of money put into the renovation. Everything from shot electrical work, rusted out pipes, crumbling bathrooms, and serious water damage/foundation problems can be fixed in a few weekends by anyone. Naturally, if you have a college degree, especially in something technical, it makes you a qualified electrician, carpenter, civil engineer, plumber, mason, and so on.

Most of these same people never get around to successfully completing any projects in their houses, but they assure me that the projects really are “easy” and that spending a few thousand dollars and a few weekends will make their house worth tens of thousands of dollars more… right…

 
 
 
Comment by In Montana
2010-03-13 10:49:58

heh, exactly what’s happened here..

 
 
 
Comment by Lisa
2010-03-13 10:12:09

“‘The report is not warning of the ‘next big crisis,’ Ziegler said, but is a reminder that the housing market still a long way from recovery. ‘The reality is that there are more [foreclosed properties] to come, and it will stretch out how long it takes the recovery to play out,’ Ziegler said. ‘It is a cautionary tale.’”

And just who will be able to purchase all these properties? Who will want to?? Current U6 at 18%, and that still doesn’t include all the self employed folks out of work, or working less than they’d like. FB’s stuck in their debt traps or credit ruined for a few years if they walk. Who is left to buy??

One topic that would be interesting to discuss….where are HBB’ers considering their next home purchase? Given the dismal budget picture for so many of the states, where is it safe to buy? Taxes, assessments, etc. are surely headed up over the next few years, so how does that shape re-location plans?

Comment by In Montana
2010-03-13 10:51:09

next home purchase will be a minivan

Comment by wolfgirl
2010-03-13 11:00:09

No furure home purchase. If/when we sell, we will rent.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-03-13 11:56:18

We did that — all cash. Bought ourselves one of them ‘defective’ Toyotas!

Comment by eudemon
2010-03-13 11:59:41

They are defective. That’s why there was a recall by Toyota. Remember?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by combotechie
2010-03-13 12:04:48

Sell ‘em when they’re hot. Buy ‘em when they’re not.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-03-13 11:32:23

“…where are HBB’ers considering their next home purchase?”

When is the relevant question for me, and the answer is ‘in the next life.’ I am thinking ahead to helping my kids out when and if they decide to become home owners. Given govt-sponsored market intervention to artificially prop up home prices, and the likely effect, which is to transfer the next two decades’ worth of potential home equity gains from Main Street home buyers to Wall Street’s owners of toxic MBS, I see no upside potential for getting into a home purchase for the foreseeable future.

Comment by natalie
2010-03-14 07:43:18

“transfer the next two decades’ worth of potential home equity gains from Main Street home buyers to Wall Street’s owners of toxic MBS”

I love you PB but I do not think this is accurate. MBSs are debt interests, not an equity interests (although there is a tax concept of debt/equity analysis using such factors as chance of repayment which is besides the point I am discussing). All the holders are ever promised is principal plus an interest rate. The only equity component is whether they will be made whole or not. All the equity gains (assuming there are any) are taken by the main street home sellers in the form of higher sales prices or via cash out refi’s. Don’t be fooled by the media that is trying to shift blame and doesn’t understand cash flows. True MBS demand created moral hazard which crippled due diligence checks and balances, they did not tap into the extra equity. MBS buyers took a hit on these, not getting rich.

Comment by Steamed Bean
2010-03-15 06:33:48

If those debt interests trade for 10 cents on the dollar, because you assume the loans will default and you won’t recover squat, there is alot of “equity” like upside if the gubmint can keep house prices propped up in an attempt to keep FB’s from defaulting.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by oxide
2010-03-13 16:26:25

I had wanted to buy a home by the time I reached *ahem* a “certain age.” But the good house prices are in places where the jobs are not, and vice versa. Looks like an Oil City retirement for me.

Comment by jane
2010-03-13 17:45:17

I’m with you on that. There are lots of Oil Cities out there. IMHO, one can do worse than to locate to a place where the scale of life is amenable to building a network of community with your neighbors and living simply, free of financial fear. My simplistic antennae look to places abjured by the brittle and self-satisfied. When I hear a contemptuous sniff about someplace or other that is beneath the notice of sophisticated folk ‘like us’, my ears perk up.

I don’t want to be around ’sophisticated folk like us’. ‘Sophistication’ generally translates into living beyond one’s means. Being around ’sophisticated people’ of this ilk is like being around a redlining woodchipper. I would prefer not to do it willingly, and when my youngest is out of school - should he opt to go - I’ll be able to choose that option. Yay, with very small exclamation points, lest I draw attention to my subversive plan.

Comment by oxide
2010-03-14 06:09:43

+1 IMO, sophistication generally translates to arrogance. I’d rather be a redneck (minus the bible-thumping racism).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Rancher
2010-03-14 07:38:37

We did that 15 years ago and have never looked
back. Smiling.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-03-13 10:43:46

“Brown sits on the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee and is among a group worried that Democrats have given away too much to woo Republican support for the bill. ‘Republicans are doing the bidding of their benefactors, the banks,’ he said.”

After all the bailouts this Administration has presided over, with the enthusiastic participation of the Democratic majorities in the House and Senate by the likes of Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, this turd has a lot of gall to single out the Republicans as being creatures of the banksters. BOTH parties are guilty of this. The sooner people realize this and throw the bums out, the better.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-03-13 10:45:00

“Still another Democratic senator, who asked not to be named, said the influence of banks isn’t limited to senators in just one party. ‘These banking institutions are so powerful, they’re all afraid of taking them on,’ the senator said.”

The hell you say….

Comment by CarrieAnn
2010-03-13 11:35:36

A little MSM light on the oligarchy. I wonder how many will sit and stew on that quote like we did.

I spent a long time trying to consider how middle America would fight so powerful a group if our entire central government has their tail between their legs in response.

Comment by snake charmer
2010-03-13 19:11:59

+1. It’s a dead giveaway where true power lies when even a sitting United States Senator — perhaps because Goldman Sachs now legally can spend unlimited monies backing an electoral opponent — is afraid to give his/her name. Maybe members of Congress should start using internet blog handles, like Intimidated or FutureLobbyist or love_blankfein.

 
Comment by measton
2010-03-13 20:33:14

“I spent a long time trying to consider how middle America would fight so powerful a group if our entire central government has their tail between their legs in response”

Again, ever wonder how a chavez get’s elected. Well when the oligarchy pushes too far eventually the masses revolt. I just don’t understand how the elite can read history and yet repeat this mistake again and again.

Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-03-16 10:04:55

“It’s different here.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by measton
2010-03-13 20:31:23

Still another Democratic senator, who asked not to be named, said the influence of banks isn’t limited to senators in just one party. ‘These banking institutions are so powerful, they’re all afraid of taking them on,’ the senator said.”

Thank you supreme court.

This fear is the result of consolidation, and globilization, and now unregulated campaign contributions. The beauty of the supreme court decision is that corporations won’t have to spend a lot of money to get what they want out of gov, they will just have to threaten to do so.

 
Comment by SDGreg
2010-03-14 04:42:07

“Still another Democratic senator, who asked not to be named, said the influence of banks isn’t limited to senators in just one party. ‘These banking institutions are so powerful, they’re all afraid of taking them on,’ the senator said.”

Which is another big reason from breaking up the big banks.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-03-13 11:27:06

“Massachusetts could face a second wave of foreclosures as tens of thousands of distressed and bank-owned properties hit the market, slowing the state’s nascent housing recovery, officials from the Massachusetts Housing Partnership said. Clark Ziegler, executive director of the state’s quasi-public, affordable housing agency, said there are about 64,000 distressed properties in so-called shadow inventory poised to go on the market because they have delinquent mortgages, are in foreclosure, or already are owned by a lender.”

With another foreclosure wave looming and thousands of distressed and bank-owned properties soon to hit the market, it sounds as though Clark’s affordable housing agency is about to realize levels of success in providing affordable housing that he never even dreamed was possible in Bean Town.

I sure wish that real estate investor with the MIT Economics Department ties, BeaconStreet, were still around to pillory. Trolls seem to have become an endangered species once again…

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-03-13 11:34:49

“Alan Clayton-Matthews, a professor of public policy at Northeastern University, doesn’t believe shadow inventory will have a big impact locally. He said shadow inventory has been an issue for a while. ‘If this were a problem, it would derail the recovery in housing. We would have seen its effects by now,’ Clayton-Matthews said.”

Enjoy hearing yourself whistle a happy tune as you stroll alongside the graveyard, Alan. Since he is a professor of public policy, I would have to assume he knows less about housing market economics than even the typical economist knows…

Comment by oxide
2010-03-13 19:17:42

doesn’t believe shadow inventory will have a big impact locally.

…because it’s “different” there. Shadow inventory will have a big impact “somewhere else.”

We’ll never escape that little meme.

Comment by Northeastener
2010-03-14 08:30:50

…because it’s “different” there

It is different, at least until it stops being different. Try finding an affordable house within 30 miles of Boston, in a town with a good school system (i.e. not Brockton, Lynn, etc.), that doesn’t need tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of work. Good luck, because every late 20 early 30-something working in Boston, living in city, is looking to move out to the burbs to raise a family and is looking for exactly that.

Eastern Masachusetts has an interesting mix of strict zoning, a lack of affordable land for development, an older, established population base (i.e. people keeping property in the family), and a fairly diverse economy supported by the higher-education racket… Harvard, MIT, Northeastern, BU, BC, Berkley, Wellesley, etc (never mind the UMASS system that I attended). Add to that the almost one-third of the working population of MA works for state or local government in some way, and you have a recipe for a housing market that remains depressingly expensive.

That’s not to say prices aren’t moving down, but most of the losses are happening outside of 495. The last heat-map of price gains/losses I saw actually had Weston and Cambridge prices increasing. Anyway, this bubble popping is moving at very different speeds across the country.

 
 
Comment by natalie
2010-03-14 07:47:47

The problem with shadow inventory is when it becomes actual inventory. Thus, the statement makes no sense. I do not even think he knows what it means.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-03-13 11:50:32

“Brown sits on the Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee and is among a group worried that Democrats have given away too much to woo Republican support for the bill. ‘Republicans are doing the bidding of their benefactors, the banks,’ he said.”

“The warnings come as committee Chairman Chris Dodd announced that negotiations with Republicans are taking too long and that he will unveil his own Wall Street reform bill Monday. Though Dodd’s proposal has no Republican support, the Connecticut Democrat said he will incorporate many Republican ideas in the hopes he will win bipartisan support.”

I thought the banking whores, Dodd and Frank, were D-rats? I stand corrected if they have changed affiliation to R-can…

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-03-13 13:04:57

Democrats and Republicans are two sides of the same coin. They’ve both pocketed their thirty pieces of silver for selling out middle America.

 
Comment by pismoclam
2010-03-13 20:55:59

The Republicans are the party of - KNOW. !!!

 
 
Comment by JackO
2010-03-13 13:55:01

It kind of reminds me of when I was taking a RE appraisal course as part of my education.
The prof said “Never think that the fact that you don’t owe any money on your property will protect you from losing it by not having to pay on loans! The government can get you with the tax rates!”

When tax rates are based upon income needed , divided into the assessed valuations, as the valuations decline the tax rate goes up, forcing more people into financial trouble.

I forsee trouble coming due to that scenario!

Comment by combotechie
2010-03-13 16:46:32

“The government can get you with the tax rates!”

As in “The power to tax is the power to destroy”.

Go to where the money is: The Willy Sutton method of revenue enhancement.

Those who have money will subsidize those who don’t. Willy Sutton did some equalizing with a gun, the government will do it with a pen.

Comment by scdave
2010-03-14 06:59:39

+ 1 Combo…

Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-03-14 08:42:50

Great point . It’s very upsetting that the people with the pen are on the side of people and entities that are traitors to the Country and its people by simply the greed and power motive .

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by jane
2010-03-13 18:16:43

JackO, I tried opening the link under your name in order to read your web site. I got a message that I was forbidden to access it. I don’t recall being snipey to you, lol! The people here have an amazing lot of intellectual capital for the ‘rest of us’ to appreciate, on their web sites. I like to see the kinds of things they all do. Thanks.

 
Comment by Eggman
2010-03-13 22:43:02

Prop 13.

 
 
Comment by mugsy
2010-03-13 13:59:09

“The number of published auction announcements tracked by Warren Group jumped in January by 81.5 percent to 2,385 compared with 1,314 in the same month in 2009. ‘The number of auctions is off the chart,’ Bluestone said. ‘It can have the effect of continuing to depress prices just as they are continuing to come back.’”

Weren’t the folks at the Warren group just crowing about how prices in Mass were headed back to the sky? Ben posted that little tidbit here a few weeks back and I thought “wow, they can’t get jobs in Mass but the real estate is headed back up?”

Dear Warren group: Stick to the data and be objective or please STFU. K? Thanks!

 
Comment by DebtinNation
2010-03-14 01:12:10

“To shed light on how local policies affect real property values, co-“To “To shed light on how local policies affect real property values, co-editor editor Dennis Heffley and UConn economics Ph.D. graduate student Ekaterina Gnedenko apply a novel ‘open city’ model to examine policies including municipal taxes, spending, zoning and regional cooperation that maximize local property values.”

Don’t tell the director I said so
But are you safe Miss Gradenko
We were at a policy meeting
They were planning new ways of cheating
I didn’t want to rock your boat
But you sent this dangerous note. . .

–The Police, Synchronicity

Comment by DebtinNation
2010-03-14 01:13:41

Oops, Ipod cut and paste strikes again.

 
 
Comment by BlueStar
2010-03-14 07:50:25

I love irony!
A frequent rallying cry of the Tea Party is gun rights. I know it’s true because the press has posted dozens of stories about the surge of “Real Americans” buying up guns and ammo because they fear a Obama gun grab. Well don’t tell this to the shareholders of the Smith & Wesson who saw their investment loose 12% on 5x normal trade volume when the company missed earnings and lowered forecasts. Green shoots?

 
Comment by Housing Wizard
2010-03-14 08:39:12

Well ,because of Lobby power ,and the New Supreme Court decision giving
Political power via that influence (what were they thinking ),its leaves the actual people very powerless and brainwashed . Looks like the TBTF will set up new Politicians to take the place of the old ones or smear anybody any good ,or bribe them once they get in .

You can take away power from Monopolies by voting with your money . Don’t do business with entities that are the power players . Boycotting is a very effective method if done on a large scale . Don’t do business with Goldmans ,go to a smaller Company (they deal in large part with big institutional investors so they are holding the cards ).Only buy products
that are American made ,this will be hard because very few products are manufactured locally any more . Cancel health insurance policies that have been raised 39 per cent with reduced coverage if your employer doesn’t pick up the full tap (this is a big risk boycotting health insurance
policies because if you get sick you will have to pay for health care while you are boycotting ). Call up and complain to Companies that have reduced their service and fired people and say your not going to shop there anymore because they don’t have enough service . Bitch about
foreign outsourced help that you can’t understand what they are saying and they never resolve the problem in the customer is always right way .
Bitch about not being able to talk to a supervisor or a live person and being put on hold . Your time is valuable also and Companies saving money by not effectively servicing you and avoiding you while hiring
foreigners with scripts is unacceptable .

Recently it took me three calls and about the same amount of letters to get real remedy on a complaint . They are just hoping you will go away because they make it so difficult . I even had a bank burn me and their excuse was that they were in the middle of going from big bank to Mega bank with mergers . These bastards will continue to give less ad less to the customer ,while they charge more ,its called monopolies .

Look ,if the Politicians aren’t going to do right by the Country ,and the system has been that corrupted, than write your Politicians with threats
that at least you are going to get rid of them .And know your Politician and see how they voted on issues ,in spite of lip service given .

I’m just saying that this is a critical time in History in which a take-over has occurred that will destroy America as ever coming close to what it was . Violations of contracts after the fact and Corporation bail-outs ,(and yes Banks and Investment houses and Insurance Companies are private Corporations ).Faulty systems operations that are designed to pad the pocket of the elite ,while the people get poorer and poorer .
Bizarre remedies suggested to allow for the power brokers to remain in power . No rhyme or reason to costs anymore and less choice because of monopolies and rigged systems . Job loss by the millions for Americans .
Investment losses transferred to the people who are already tapped out .
Unacceptable …unacceptable …unacceptable . Total overhaul needed .

Comment by B. Durbin
2010-03-14 13:54:12

On health care– my husband’s employer offers several different providers. The employee can choose his or her best option depending on particular needs. I don’t like it when corporations about the small size only offer one option, because it does make for abusive practices.

 
 
Comment by aNYCdj
2010-03-14 13:02:54

I suggest this for the HBB theme song:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Dh-WOlFkHg

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post