Bits Bucket For April 5, 2010
Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here. Please visit the HBB Forum.
Examining the home price boom and its effect on owners, lenders, regulators, realtors and the economy as a whole.
Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here. Please visit the HBB Forum.
It is often hard to tell whether Fed insiders are truly confused about where inflation is headed, or if they are merely trying to confuse their audience.
* The Wall Street Journal
* APRIL 5, 2010
Inflation Fears Cut Two Ways At the Fed
By JON HILSENRATH
The Federal Reserve’s decisions to keep interest rates near zero and to flood the financial system with credit are sparking fears of an eventual outbreak of inflation.
But inside the Fed, an influential band of policy makers is fretting over the opposite: that the already-low rate of inflation is slowing further.
The presidents of the New York and San Francisco regional Fed banks, William Dudley and Janet Yellen, see the abating inflation rate as convincing evidence the economy still is burdened by excess capacity and needs to be sustained by the Fed.
Others, led by Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser, argue that current inflation measures are distorted by an epic decline in housing costs and could mask a buildup of inflationary pressures.
This intensifying internal Fed debate over the behavior of inflation comes as the central bank plots an exit from an unprecedented experiment in easy money. Its read on inflation will influence how quickly it moves to raise short-term interest rates—which impacts everything from mortgage rates to new business costs to stock performance—and drain huge sums it pumped into the financial system during the recession. Recent developments have given the inflation-rate-is-dropping camp an upper hand.
In 2008, overall consumer prices actually fell for the first time in half a century, but then rebounded as energy prices stabilized. Over the past 12 months, the consumer-price index has risen 2.1%. But measures of inflation that strip out volatile energy and food prices are decelerating. Excluding food and energy, consumer prices in February were 1.3% higher than a year earlier. That was the smallest 12-month increase in six years, and well below year-over-year increases of above 2% before the recession.
“When unemployment is so high, wages and incomes tend to rise slowly, and producers and retailers have a hard time raising prices,” Ms. Yellen, who is expected to be President Barack Obama’s nominee to become the Fed’s vice chairman, said in a speech last week. “That’s the situation we’re in today, and, as a result, underlying inflation pressures are already very low and trending downward.”
Mr. Dudley made similar comments in comments in Lexington, Va., last week. “The substantial amount of slack in productive capacity that exists today will likely only be absorbed gradually. Consequently, trend inflation, at least over the near term, should remain very low.”
In this camp, one worry is that inflation-adjusted interest rates—also known as real interest rates—could rise even if the Fed sits on its hands. Such a rise would be a disincentive for businesses to invest in new projects and for consumers to spend.
This unintended increase in rates could put a brake on the economic recovery.
The opposing camp believes the combination of low rates and more than $1 trillion the Fed has pumped into the financial system is a formula for inflation down the road. “As the economy improves and as lending picks up, the longer-term challenge we face will not be worrying about inflation being too low,” Mr. Plosser said in an interview. “The risk is really to the upside of inflation over the next two to three years.”
This camp focuses less on the amount of slack in the economy—the high unemployment rate and the number of empty office buildings, shopping malls and idle factories—and more on the risk that consumers and businesses will anticipate inflation and act accordingly. At the Fed’s mid-March meeting, Thomas Hoenig, president of the Kansas City Fed, argued for an increase in short-term interest rates “soon” to “lower the risks of…an increase in long-run inflation expectations.”
Surveys and bond price movements suggest Americans expect inflation of around 2% year-in and year-out, and Fed officials believe this helps keep the inflation rate stable. A change in inflation expectations in either direction could become important in Fed deliberations.
Mr. Plosser also argues that the recent decline in the inflation rate is a mirage, greatly influenced by an unusual decline in housing costs, which are heavily weighted in many price indexes. Excluding the cost of shelter, consumer prices were up 3.4% from a year earlier in February, pushed up in part by energy prices.
Excluding food, energy and housing, they were up 2.6% from a year ago. “I want to be careful not to read too much into one measure of inflation that is very influenced by housing,” Mr. Plosser said.
Researchers at the San Francisco and New York Fed are scheduled to release a retort to this argument Monday that shows that among 50 different categories of consumer spending—from computers to hotels to jewelry—inflation rates have slowed over the past 18 months from the earlier trend.
The Fed has said it would keep short-term rates low for an “extended period,” a phrase which means at least several months—as long as inflation is subdued, inflation expectations are stable and the economy is slack.
A persistent slowing of the inflation rate could push rate increases further into the future, possibly into 2011. But if officials dismiss recent data or if the pace of price increases accelerates, the Fed may boost rates before year-end.
Traders in futures markets anticipate the Fed will raise its benchmark federal-funds rate, which it has been holding near zero since December 2008, to 0.5% by November.
…
Well at some level, we ALREADY had inflation. But the bubble was characterized not so much as an increase in the amount of money chasing consumer goods as it was an increase in the ammount of CREDIT chasing assets that could be used as collateral, largely RE, stocks, and bonds. Now that many of those loans have turned bad, the Fed is trying, in their capacity as lender of last resort, to shore up the banks supply of money by lending to them bases on those now questionable assets.
It’s yet another head I win, tails you lose game. When asset prices were growing by leaps and bounds, we were told by Greenspan that those weren’t part of the “price stability” mandate of the Fed. But now the PTB are trying to press the idea that deflation in asset prices would cause the sort of economic Ragnarok that must be avoided at all costs. The Panic of 2008 may or may not have been justified, but it is yet another case where early intervention would have been easier than later overcorrection.
“Well at some level, we ALREADY had inflation.”
Right. Like, for instance, CA gasoline was around $1.25 a gallon in the mid-1990s; now it has ’stabilized’ around $3.00 a gallon, which translates into a dollar loss in gasoline purchasing power of (1.25/3.00-1)*100 = -58 percent… major OUCH for those who moved out into the sticks to enjoy lower housing costs in exchange for a longer commute!
You’re assuming that the only factor involved is the monetary phenomenon of inflation. There are likely other factors, such as supply and demand.
Not that I disagree with your (or the OP’s) orginal premise.
Your point is taken:
Economists distinguish between inflation, an increase in the general price level, and relative price increases, such as an increase in the price of one good — say gasoline or bread or housing or air fares or medical services or college educations or you name it — relative to all other goods.
I hear this all of this talk of supply and demand and then these vague definitions of the taxing phantom named “inflation”.
It’s all BS and about government sponsored corporate business cartels and their marketing. Large and small.
For Christ’s Sake, we have companies bottling common city tap water in someplace like New Jersey and selling it as Spring Water in Minnesota for $1.75 a small bottle. These companies are in business for only one reason…some idiots buy it.
The Wall Street investor class yield spread/squeeze gang has it’s hands into everything from little kids supermarket candy products to your triple heart by-pass surgery at your local AMA approved chop shop.
The FIRE gang of investment roaches are just in the spotlight now because of the current cost and pain suddenly hurts more than the other high cost insults at the present time.
The overall major costs in production, avaiability and distribution of basic goods, needs and services in this country isn’t due to normal simple inflation, it’s due to pure and simple speculation and investor greed over the last 20 years.
Just a late morning rant…
(Okay…where’s the decaf ?)
I have a case of bottled water in my emergency kit, and i only buy distilled water for the table fountain and my lucky bamboo plant. Everything else gets tap.
“Just a late morning rant…
(Okay…where’s the decaf ?)”
You Wisconsin folks need a good earthquake to put the fear of the Lord into you…
About the only thing Wisconsin is afraid of is high energy bills in the winters, a bratwurst shortage, a Packer loss and a beer tax.
As for the Lord, he’s our friend and knows where to find us.
…of course our stupid Deptment of Natural Resources(DNR) will proably still require him to buy a full priced Wisconsin Fishing License if he intends to fish in God’s Country with us.
And the increase in gas prices is counted as “growth” in our silly system.
Isn’t it grand!?
Hey, you have to count the amount of speculation per minus raw $2.00 a barrel of ME oil that comes out of the ground as well as transportation, refining, middle man handling, tax and delivery too.
Keeps everybody fat n’ happy… drive on James!
The gasoline scam is really heating up. Crude is up almost $2 per barrel today on “the jobs report”. This is going to be the knockout blow for any recovery. Even “traders” are aghast at prices. Looks like everybody is rushing in to hop on the speculation train so as not to miss another runup.
Here is an example — the price of a pound of whole wheat bread was about $1.10 back in 1995; it hit $1.50 during the 2002 liquidity blast from the Fed to offset recession following the tech stock collapse, then was subsequently mainly stable in the $1.30 - $1.50 range through late 2006, when it took off towards a late-2008 level above $2.00.
The recent price of whole wheat bread has trended down from its peak to a level of about $1.75. If the Treasury’s ’strong dollar’ policy continues, we should anticipate further declines going forward (good for retirees!)…
BLS price data source
FYI that’s only for “consumables” and the like - doesn’t include housing, clothing, cars, medical care, etc.
Do you perchance know of a link for all CPI components?
There is a serious disconnect here…everyday I see products being downsized…or a combination of downsizing and a small price increase which always turns out to be a lot more then a measly 2%.
I’ve said it before they use retail prices and not unit pricing…
ice cream is still $4.99 not 64oz but 48oz….no inflation here folks.
————-
Over the past 12 months, the consumer-price index has risen 2.1%. But measures of inflation that strip out volatile energy and food prices are decelerating
Right — smaller packaging is a good way to sneak in some inflation without driving away your customers. A good survey methology would focus on price per unit weight, not price per box; my impression is that the BLS actually uses price per unit weight, but I am not sure.
methodology (need some coffee, or perhaps a few more aftershocks…).
I found an older can of tuna and made it up into salad for lunch the other day. I couldn’t believe how much there was - more than enough for two lunches. With the new cans, you take enough for one lunch and there is barely two tablespoons left over - hardly enough to save. I don’t believe for a second that the new ones are 5 oz to the old 6 oz. They must have upped the amount of water in the new cans as well as reducing the actual amount.
I’ve noticed this too. An old can of tuna would make two large sandwiches. A new can makes a little more than one. Not only is the weight on the label smaller, it’s mostly water.
polly they used to be 6 1/2 ounces for many years
I don’t see how we can have inflation as long as the banks keep on sucking money out of the economy. In inflationary times banks loan money into existence; lately they have been repudiating money out of existence.
Money that makes its way into the clutches of banks doesn’t leave. This chokes the supply of circulating money, creating a fiat shortage.
Look about you if you don’t believe me. Look at college fees, they’ve gone through the roof. This is as sign of inflation, right?
Wrong! It’s a sign of deflation. College fees have gone up because the college subsidies have been yanked away, at least they have here in California. The subsidies have been yanked because there is a shortage of money. Now students have to pay more of the freight which pisses them off so they take to the streets in protest.
So what is happening is the inflation that has been papered over by gov’t subsidies is now rearing it’s ugly head as surplus gov’t money dries up. The inflation was always there, it’s just being unmasked now…
Actually I’d argue that it’s not so much “inflation” as massive mismanagement of public programs… The prices wouldn’t have skyrocketed in the first place if
1) They had built more schools/infrastructure to meet the student demand over the past few years
2) They hadn’t handed out endless raises, pension benefits, and vacation to already overpaid public employees.
3) They had saved some of the amazing surpluses of the past few years for our current “rainy day”
Low inflation - how horrible!
Savers’ money will still have value in the future!
People will have to pay off their debts vs. letting inflation white-wash their errors!
It’ll be harder to have another Bubble without inflation, and we all know Bubbles are what our eCONomy runs on.
Oh, the horror!
+1, PTM
Oil and 10 yr breaking out. Is it inflation or solvency fears?
April 5 (Bloomberg) — Treasury 10-year notes rose to 4 percent for the first time since June as reports on the service industries and pending home sales added to signs the U.S. economic recovery is gaining traction.
Harley Davidson is “breaking out” too. It’s becoming harder and harder to find the words to justify all this nonsense.
As I’ve said, I don’t care how an economist defines squat. All I care about is the effects on my wallet and it I see my wages go down and prices go up and what an economist says doesn’t match that situation, then they can go hang.
Agreed, eco.
It’s stagflation…the worst of all possible outcomes, IMHO.
I am encouraged by articles like this one that the strengthening housing recovery will take away any further rationale for artificially propping up the market. The Fed, the Treasury, the FHA, the GSEs and all other federal government entities that have been pumping intravenous life support into the market now can take away the feeding tubes and let the market start feeding itself again.
* The Wall Street Journal
* AHEAD OF THE TAPE
* APRIL 5, 2010
House Call: Looking Past Real-Estate Woes
* By KELLY EVANS
…
The market may not be nearly as weak as is commonly assumed. Activity is down sharply from the boom, but that is arguably a positive development. Total sales, as of February, were running just about 10% below their long-run average, according to J.P. Morgan economist Michael Feroli. In addition, foreclosure-mitigation programs and an overtaxed court system are likely to keep inventory from immediately flooding the market. St. Louis-based Macroeconomic Advisers expects a steady rebound in home-building from its current depressed levels will add nearly a percentage-point to U.S. economic growth this year and next.
Even if the worst-case scenario does start to unfold—supply soars while demand stagnates and prices move down further—it isn’t clear that would be a disaster. With interest and mortgage rates already inching higher, falling prices would keep housing affordable for new buyers. Price declines pose a risk to banks’ profitability, but last year’s stress tests boosted capital requirements precisely to account for such a scenario. A negative-wealth effect could hamper consumer spending, but the rebounding stock market has already boosted household wealth by some $5 trillion from its trough.
In short, the odds of a stronger recovery now seem at least as likely as the odds of a weaker one. Fed officials remain confident they can quickly outrun any breakout of inflationary pressures.
Let’s hope the hound dogs have their nose on the right trail.
“Total sales, as of February, were running just about 10% below their long-run average, according to J.P. Morgan economist Michael Feroli.”
I betcha J.P. Morgan has a nice Fed-funded cash war chest waiting to be pulled out from under the mattress for whenever the real real estate fire sales commence…
You’ve had your smoothie early this fine morning, PBear.
last year’s stress tests boosted capital requirements precisely to account for such a scenario.
Wait, who did the boosting? The Fed/Treasury? Yay, another taxpayer funded pre-emptive bailout. *sigh* I hope all this bailing is a prelude to breaking up these behomeths. It would be kinda cool if we had to save the banks in order to destroy them.
“You’ve had your smoothie early this fine morning, PBear.”
Two aftershocks jolted me out of bed (4.20a, 6.33a), to be soon followed by coffee…
Actually there have been perhaps 100 significant (magnitude 3.0 or greater) earthquakes in the Northern Baja California region since yesterday afternoon. It’s amazing!
Hush my sweet earth….Don’t wake the Bear!
I’m in Palm Desert and it rolled for about a minute. We had to leave the building we were in. Aftershocks woke me up several times last night and the dogs are pacing today.
I didn’t feel those shocks. PB have you been losing sleep?
God must be getting even with me for those mean things I said about Catholics yesterday.
Temblor could disturb faults, scientists say
By Scott LaFee, UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
Monday, April 5, 2010 at 12:04 a.m.
The 7.2-magnitude earthquake that rippled through San Diego County and Baja California yesterday was noticeably long (up to a minute) and widely felt (as far away as Las Vegas and Phoenix), but the real import may be what the shaking bodes for California.
“Any quake of this size seems to pass some kind of threshold where it’s large enough to disturb or trigger other faults,” said Pat Abbott, a professor emeritus of geology at San Diego State University. “In cases like this, that often means increasing stress on other faults, which makes them more prone to movement. The energy seems to be moving northward toward the San Andreas Fault. I don’t want to anthropomorphize, but it’s like this quake was goading the San Andreas.”
It remains to be seen how the 810-mile San Andreas Fault was affected by yesterday’s temblors. The southern section of the fault worries scientists because it has not ruptured in more than 300 years.
A 2008 study estimated the probability of a magnitude-6.7 or greater quake occurring in California within the next 30 years at 99 percent. The probability of one that is 7.5 or larger was set at 46 percent — and would most likely happen in the southern half of the state.
Easter Sunday’s 7.2 temblor was preceded by a handful of smaller quakes that began Wednesday, with the last happening just six minutes before the big jolt.
“Obviously, these now look like they were foreshocks,” said Nancy King, a geophysicist for the U.S. Geological Survey.
…
Ever since that monster quake in Chile, the action has been working its way north. A quake of size in the not too distant future in California, the Pacific Northwest, and maybe even Alaska is almost certain, IMHO.
I heard that the administration is using high-level Interior Department personnel to pressure the geological profession into renaming the San Andreas Fault, Bush’s Fault.
So when it goes, it’ll be… Bush’s Fault!
“Ever since that monster quake in Chile, the action has been working its way north. A quake of size in the not too distant future in California, the Pacific Northwest, and maybe even Alaska is almost certain, IMHO.”
Interesting thought: A destabilizing quake in South America gradually causes crustal adjustment that works its way north.
Kind of like how a U.S. housing crash is likely to eventually extend all the way to China, neh?
(Sung by U.S. to China…)
Money is a burning thing
and it makes a fiery ring
bound by wild desire
I fell in to a ring of fire…
I fell in to a burning ring of fire
I went down,down,down
and the flames went higher.
And it burns,burns,burns
the ring of fire
the ring of fire.
The taste of money is sweet
when economies like ours meet
I fell for you like a child
oh, but the fire went wild..
I fell in to a burning ring of fire…..
Yes a pretty nice earthquake , I was in the Northridge quake and Sylmar Quake as well. This one was far away from Poway but lasted a long time. First the windows rattle then the ground moves up and down , I also notice this in the Northridge quake after shocks when I worked in Valencia.
I wonder if this earth Quake caused a neighbor to go on a murdering rampage down the street ? maybe not I hear he was crazy anyway. Enraged Electronics Technicain. I think the cops put 10 plus rounds into him and crumpled him up at the gas meter at the side of his victim’s house.
They will need to fix the window were the son jumped out of to get away, same son who was knifed by this loony a couple years ago. Yes I live in the good part of Poway……
“I think the cops put 10 plus rounds into him and crumpled him up at the gas meter at the side of his victim’s house.
They will need to fix the window were the son jumped out of to get away, same son who was knifed by this loony a couple years ago. Yes I live in the good part of Poway……”
Would you say this is a good time to buy in Poway?
Let prices fall!!!
Let’s making ‘affordability’ actually mean something, again.
Who needs coffee when you have earthquakes to wake you up?
Can you describe what you felt P-Bear? Was it a roller, how long, etc.
I rode out the Loma Prieta quake in ‘89 and it’s something I’ll never forget.
- The initial temblor (yesterday afternoon) was a roller — 10 seconds long.
- Two sons and I were out on the front long before it ended.
- Luckily my wife is out of town, as screaming would have added to the mild sense of panic we felt.
- There have been numerous aftershocks, including this wake up call.
Time to get back to bed; too early for coffee!
Why is it again that people like to buy homes down here?
2 Dead in 7.2 Magnitude Earthquake
The quake was centered in Baja California, Mexico and was felt all across Southern California.
That was the longest and strongest I’ve felt in the 15 years I’ve been in southern California, maybe 30 seconds or a little longer, more rolling than anything else. A couple of DVD’s slid off a printer and the bookshelves were moving from the walls but didn’t topple over or any of the books fall out. Those shelves are getting strapped to the walls soon, even if I have to drill holes in the apartment walls. I’ll worry about how to fill those holes whenever I move out.
It lasted long enough I could look out the window and see the apartment building across the street also moving. Several smaller aftershocks were felt in the few hours that followed. I could tell from how long it lasted and that the shaking/movement here wasn’t more severe that some place not too far away had had a sizable quake.
SDGreg & PB-
Thanks for the 1st hand accounts. I’ve experienced the 1971 & 1994 earthquakes in the L A area. According to Dr. Lucy at Cal Tech (Pasadena), we’re overdue for a sizeable one up here. Oddly, just yesterday morning, I was reading that once the CEA (Ca Earthquake Authority -St EQ Ins) runs out of $ due to FIFO claims, the rest are s.o.o.l. There is no govt. overflow valve.
I’ve been doing my due diligence on EQ ins.
Dr. Lucy Rocks. I remember seeing her after a quake years ago doing an interview in grubby clothes with a baby on her hip.
“Those shelves are getting strapped to the walls soon, even if I have to drill holes in the apartment walls.”
On my (out of town) wife’s urging, I did one of those ’strap the furniture to the walls’ projects last night. I am pretty sure any quake strong enough to tip over a 300 lb piece of furniture will also easily rip the straps out of the wall, but meanwhile my wife will get to enjoy her piece of mind.
peace of mind (coffee is tasting good this morning after the shocks!…)
Nice flash of Hanibal the canibal early in the morning.
It was like being on a ship in a storm on acid. slow motion weird science.
Party at Ann’s!
The one earthquake I’ve been in (Costa Rica in ‘93), seemed remarkably like that. The eeriest thing was the way all the animals in the jungle went completely bonkers about 15 secs. before the quake hit.
Nope — no inflation here, except for in the ‘volatile’ food and energy sector, and who needs food and energy, anyway?
Oil rises to near $86 as US jobs market improves
By ALEX KENNEDY, Associated Press Writer
Sunday, April 4, 2010 at 10:30 p.m.
SINGAPORE — Oil prices jumped to near $86 a barrel Monday in Asia, extending gains from last week as investors bet an improving U.S. job market will herald growing crude demand.
Benchmark crude for May delivery was up 80 cents to $85.67 a barrel at midday Singapore time in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The contract climbed up $1.11 to settle at $84.87 on Thursday following a gain of $1.39 on Wednesday.
Global oil trading was closed for the Good Friday holiday.
Crude has jumped from $69 a barrel in early February on expectations a growing U.S. economy will eventually spark higher oil consumption.
On Friday, the U.S. Labor Department said employers added 162,000 jobs in March, the largest job gain in three years. The unemployment rate stayed at 9.7 percent for the third straight month.
“The market was positive before but now it’s been confirmed,” said Clarence Chu, a trader with market maker Hudson Capital Energy in Singapore. “If the job growth can be sustained for several months, we’ll definitely see crude demand pick up.”
…
Not actual demand….”expectations” of demand.
Maybe I’ll go out and buy a house; because I have “expectations” that home prices will appreciate at 10% year.
Wait……that’s been done…….never mind..
The job market has “improved” in the way a dead man bleeds a lot less.
Who’s shorting bonds? Out yourselves!
I was about to dump some bonds. Does that count?
Big article on how great Pimco is in the LA Times, today.
Good question, bink.
IMHO, the bond market is the most overvalued market right now — by far. I’m not good at picking bottoms, but tend to do fairly well with shorting. Bonds have been on my radar for awhile.
I have not been buying them because in many circumstances their value goes down in times of inflation. I think stocks will go up another 5% or so and then we will have a 15% correction, followed by severe volatility with a mean around current levels (which I believe is fair but only to the extent of actual recovery feeding the input side as opposed to stimulus, a circumstance I do not believe exists). Shorting is too risky for me, as I only know where prices should be given free markets and perfect knowledge. Thus, I only profit by setting aside a huge cash reserve and buying some on corrections and selling some when things are clearly over valued.
“I only know where prices should be given free markets and perfect knowledge.”
When did we ever have those conditions?
It’s all a matter of degree. The range of expected possible deviation has grown to a point that all you can do is slow play it with large cash reserves so you do not get completely whipsawed. Unlike last March, a buy and hold long term play does not work except in very small increments spread over time. Triple shorts are crazy. I have had some success with buying financials on corrections, selling after a short term 10% run up and rebuying after a 5% or more drop (with adjustment based on my feeling about the impact of current events). It really only works with a $50k block and reserves. I am a bit of a gambler and do not recommend this for most people. Although the block statement seems to contradict my small increment statement, there is only one block I use for this type of play.
Bought some TBT at 48.12 now quoted at 50.08. Wish I had bought more.
Let me add that this rise in interest rates is bad news for precious metals like Gold and Silver so it would be a good time to cut your exposure. You would think that gold would be a inflation hedge at this point but I think the rise of gold over the past 5-6 years was forecasting what we are actually experiencing now. If the 10yr bond market hits 6.0% it might just kill the gold bull. PS: note that all this interest income will be taxed at higher rates going forward! The bond markets are at the same point the equity markets were in Aug ‘07, set up for a huge fall.
If the 10yr bond market hits 6.0% it might just kill the gold bull.
Could well be - but one thing to keep in mind at this point is simply the servicing cost of the federal debt. If the 10-year hits 6%, the debt servicing cost will add about another $400 billion per year to the deficit, above where it is now. That alone is enough to offset a good chunk of what would otherwise be lost in inflation expectations.
Don’t be surprised then if the Govt. slashes the amount borrowed at the new higher rates, nobody expects that but I do. Funny how that works out, higher rates kill demand.
What is this “government borrowing slashing” of which you speak? Is that like Sasquatch or something?
Just slashing new borrowing won’t help much even. The government rolls over it’s existing loans at a rate of about $700 billion a month at this point. It has no choice but to borrow at the higher rates, if that’s all they can get.
(Well, unless the Fed steps in with more printed money of course)
Didn’t you get the memo? All that rollover debt will be stuffed into 401k and state pension funds by order of congress.
Raises hand.
Bought some TBT a while ago at 45.7, and some at 47.5. About a year ago I commented that TBT paired with GLD looked like a good play, and I still think that’s true. As long as debt continues to skyrocket - one or the other of those will go up, with the other being more flat.
Fed adds liquidity - TBT flat, GLD up
Fed holds back - TBT up, GLD flat
Only when the debt levels off - without high inflation - can both of these go down; at least as I see it. And I don’t see debt leveling off any time soon, unless we get high inflation to go with it.
I bought some TLT June 10 puts. Do those count?
Another thing people are finding tucked away in their CC&Rs: transfer fees
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/6937231.html?243254
Seems these developers want 1% every time the house ownership is transferred.
Just as I wont buy a home or property with a HOA, neither would I agree to this 1% transfer tax. These parasites need to be starved out.
..the fee, written into neighborhood restrictions, would encumber the property for 99 years..
Encumbrances are obvious. It probably means there’s another name besides yours designated under “property owner” on some contracts and on the title.
Pen in hand, you see that name and your brain says “wtf is that?” but then you decide everything must be kosher and sign on the dotted line.
I recall something similar making the news back in ‘06 or thereabouts… developers and some kind of 99 year restriction or something… My memory of it is vague.
Buyers might be wise to use an RE attorney more often than they do..
What is an Encumbrance?
An encumbrance is an interest or right to a property by someone who is not the homeowner. There are two types of encumbrances:
* Monetary encumbrance - an interest that affects a property’s ownership. Mortgages and liens are common monetary encumbrances.
* Non-monetary encumbrances - an interest that affects how the property can be used. Easements are the most common form of encumbrances.
What Can a Property Buyer Do if Encumbrances were not Disclosed?
[snip]
If a seller has failed to disclose any encumbrances, a buyer may have a claim against the seller for breach of contract.
[snip]
What Can a Buyer Do to Guard Against Undisclosed Encumbrances?..
What Can a Seller Do to Make Sure All Encumbrances are Disclosed?..
Does a Realtor Have a Duty to Disclose Encumbrances?…
Should I Consult an Attorney for My Encumbrance Problem?..
http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/encumbrance-lawyers.html
So is rent control on a property…..it affects the amount you can collect each month which also Lowers the buildings sale price.
Landlords who complain about rent control would never have been able to afford to buy the place if it was free market rent.
———————-
* Non-monetary encumbrances - an interest that affects how the property can be used. Easements are the most common form of encumbrances.
..would never have been able to afford to buy the place..
i dunno about that..
Look around and you’ll see that EVERY piece of property is owned by someone. Prices range from low to sky high, and there’s always someone who can afford it.
‘Encumbrances are obvious. It probably means there’s another name besides yours designated under “property owner” on some contracts and on the title.’
That would make it legal. Wouldn’t the buyer in that case have the right to either strike the name of the other ‘property owner’ or else walk away from the ‘deal’?
You were wondering last week about what law the Fed broke in the bailout process. Here is one man’s opinion (and he must have been angry, as he misspelled Constitution in the original post):
“This was and remains a blatantly unlawful activity.
The Fed has effectively usurped Article 1 Section 7 of The Constitution which reads in part:
All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.“
Article 1 - The Legislative Branch
Section 7 - Revenue Bills, Legislative Process, Presidential Veto
That article refers to the rules within Congress and the balance of powers between the 3 branches of government.
There may be some question as to wth the Fed actually is.. but a branch of govt it certainly is not.
“…but a branch of govt it certainly is not.”
So you are agreeing they have no legal mandate for raising Revenue?
no.. I’m saying that the constitutional principles in that article apply only to the branches of government.
Anyway, the subject is bills, not revenues.
.
All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives…
bill:
A draft of a law, presented to a legislature for enactment; a proposed or projected law.
Did the Fed write a bill or propose a law regarding revenues? Only the House can do that, according to Art1, Sec7 of the constitution.
Sounds like a scam and should be illegal if it is not.
They have had something like this in NYC forever…here its called a Flip tax…It could be on sales price or i’ve seen $10,000 per bedroom…goes back to the condo/co-op board for reserves and not to the developer.
But nobody even pretends that you have a fee absolute ownership interest in a co-op. People know that they are only getting a share in a corporation that is not freely transferable and that happens to have the right to occupy a particular apartment along with it.
Do the condos really have that fee? I thought that was one of the things they didn’t have that distinguishes them from the co-ops…
They call it a Transfer tax…..to the condo reserve fund goes
Well in some parts of Maryland, they have ground rents, where you own the house, but not the land under it and have to pay rent to the actual LAND owner.
Ground rent is evil: they can also basically kick you out of your house and take it if you don’t pay the ground rent, even though it is usually some piddly sum of money per year.
For a while there, it was also very difficult to even get any information about the actual land owner, so who knows what scams they were pulling, and I’m not even sure if you can chose to pay off the ground rent or if you’re struck paying it forever - basically renting the house you “bought” - if the land owner choses.
The surprising thing is that banks are willing to lend when you DON’T get title to the land, and can be evicted for non-payment of rent. Do lenders force payment of the ground rent out of escrow like taxes and insurance? I actually think that GRs are less evil than HOAs, simply because they’re less interested in interfering with your business, they generally just want their check every year.
Bank of Mom and Dad Shuts Amid White-Collar Struggle.
WSJ 4-5-10
FAIRFIELD, Conn.—When Maurice Johnson was laid off a year ago from his six-figure salary as a managing director at GE Capital, it wasn’t his future he was worried about. It was his childrens.
The family income of the Johnsons is a fifth of what it used to be. And the children are about to feel the pain. Mr. Johnson’s two oldest are attending his alma mater, Johns Hopkins University, at an annual cost of $50,000 apiece. And his youngest daughter, 15 years old, recently began her own college search. Mr. Johnson isn’t sure whether he’ll be able to help her to go to college, or even to get the older kids to graduation.
Cutting Off the Kids
Mr. Johnson, who watched his own father struggle as an engineer without a college degree, was determined to do better for his own children.
“We saved like crazy from the minute they were born,” he says. “Then, it all fell to pieces.”
There are hundreds of Universities and Colleges in this country with costs a small fraction of the $50k that John’s Hopkins charges. Why’d he send them there?
I’ve started saving for Mini-Chile’s college costs (he is 10 months old). I’ve also realized that I can never save/get the ROI to afford the $200k that a four-year degree at an elite east-coast institution costs. Hence, Mini-Chile will not go to an elite university. Oh well, if his attitude and high school grades are anything like mine, I’m guessing the word “elite” will not be in his college choices anyway.
“Why’d he send them there?”
1) The old-school ties network can be a real asset for networking for jobs and other favors.
2) In a world where a job description for a receptionist can specify requiring a bachelor’s degree, the perceived differentiation / “branding” of an “elite” education can be seen by some as added value worth paying a premium for.
3) Parents do desperate things trying to give their children “the best” competitive edge they can.
I’ll agree, the elite school gives a branding edge - but why not do it smart (self promotion here) since pretty much every job requires an advanced degree these days?
Go to an in state school. Pay minimal tuition, get good grades.
Leverage good grades into an assistanship at an elite school.
Go to elite school for free.
And most are not necessary….just add more debt onto people.
since pretty much every job requires an advanced degree these days?
I have a god daughter who is in the final stretch of selecting a college for next fall.
Observing the process has been interesting… she and a number of her classmates (from an “elite” NYC public school) have either not gotten in or been waitlisted to a number of state schools. Ones that apparently would have been a “sure thing” in the not so recent past.
Her father, who is an educator, says that apparently the competition to get into state college programs is really fierce, as parents look to the cheaper tuition of state schools and others look to education as a way to retrain and ride out the current situation. He’s been told the competition for graduate programs is even worse.
Her father, who is an educator, says that apparently the competition to get into state college programs is really fierce
Especially for the better ones. like University of Calif. There are other, less “elite” state schools that are easier to get into. But I understand the allure of an “elite” private or state school. The best employers recruit at those schools and not at Podunk State U. I have even seen this at Colorado State University, where the on campus recruiting is an utter joke as most grads were pretty much on their own to find a job. Not at all like when I graduated many years ago when recruiters would come on campus to interview us and we had plenty of choices and often multiple job offers before we graduated. I guess now its only the elite schools where that still happens.
Actually, many “elite” school no longer allow you to “work your way up” from other schools.
Not all, but it has become a more common policy.
I think if you truly get into an “elite” school, it is worth the branding cost. The main issue is the definition of “elite”. IMHO, once you get below the top, top schools, the cost should fall considerably.
If you Google “most expensive colleges”, there is a link to the most expensive schools (room+board) for 2009-2010. Stanford is number 70th on the list, Yale is 89th, Princeton is 96th, and Harvard is nowhere to be seen.
With due respect to other schools on the list, there are not 69 colleges in the country that would look better on a resume than any of these four…
My two cousins went to smith college now #31..at only $51K a year.
Is it just me or are these sympathy stories about someone who was making 6 figures an oxymoron?
While these type of stories re-enforce my warning to everyone that it CAN happen to you, 6 figures is still a lot of money for most people.
“Our economy is being transformed from a mostly capitalistic one to a mostly socialistic one.,” observes Peter Schiff. “More decisions are being made by politicians and lawyers in Washington and fewer by entrepreneurs……Through corruption or just plain ignorance, Congress and the Administration have embraced an ideology that has failed every time it has been tried.” ~Peter Schiff
Harsh words from Mr. Schiff. Can they be true? Has socialism always come to a bad end in the long run? Yes. For one thing, it’s contrary to nature. It’s based on a desire to equalize everything and everybody. It’s said to be the kindly “fair” thing to do, which is why modern liberals promote it. Conservatives, on the other hand, are seen as mean-spirited greedy people who resent being forced to give up their property (money) to a costly bureaucracy which distributes a portion of it to people more valued than the people who earned the money in the first place.
Comments attributed to Russia’s Vladmir Putin concerning the growing influence of “American communism.” It’s an exaggeration to call the U.S. “communistic,” but quite accurate to point out how socialist we have become. We claim to be a capitalist society, but when every business requires government approval (a license) to exist it’s clear that the country is morphing into a socialist system.
Yeah, ol’ Pootie Poot - that’s a huge exaggeration.
The state is merely performing it’s intended function, to maintain the status quo for the PTB. If that means throwing out a few “socialist” crumbs is what it takes to keep a lid on the masses - so be it. It’s called the “regulation theory” - the theory that the state will always do what it takes to keep those in power…in power.
What’s left of the middle class will pay for this. No one needs to worry about the rich, they’ll be just fine. To the top 5% it matters not if the other 95% is split between a “middle class” and the poor - or if all 95% are just “working poor”. Some might argue the “middle class” itself was the ultimate table scrap - a leftover from the days when a lurking red menace kept the West in line.
..rowing out a few “socialist” crumbs..
i see more than crumbs..
It might be dangerous for us to be set on the idea that this is some sort of PTB conspiracy, ignore other possibilities, and fail to see a factual shift into full blown socialism.
FWIW, many people felt the same way in the 1930s. But one has to keep a close eye on BOTH gov’t hands at all times.
Fave example: Upton Sinclair and E.P.I.C. Now there was a true socialist movement in the U.S.A. But FDR and the Dems threw ol’ Upton under the bus - it’s one of the more interesting, and little known, GD stories out there.
Another: After WWII ol’ Harry Truman used a heavy hand on the labor unions. It seems some of them wanted to pick up on where they left off before Pearl Harbor, and Harry was having none of that. The Korean War and Red Scare came in very handy. There was no room for that kind of labor activism in postwar America. It was a relic, along with Okies, gangsters, and the Dust Bowl. Shiny cars and Levitown (birth of contemporary concept of “middle class”) provided the grease.
We are at a crossroads, that’s for sure.
FWIW, many people felt the same way in the 1930s.
Those people were right - and we have the current crisis, in large part enabled by programs created in the 1930’s, to prove it.
After the 1930’s we were able to postpone the inevitable until now, due to several factors:
1. The baby boom created an imbalance in the work force, with a higher percentage of working-age people than normal. Until right about now.
2. WWII’s physical destruction of most of the world’s top economies - France, UK, Germany, Japan, Italy, etc. - ensured that the U.S. (which was unscathed) would have a competitive advantage for the next 30 years or so, and we did until about the late 1970’s.
3. Since the early 80’s we have been strictly borrowing our way to prosperity - with debt constantly on the rise, even as a percentage of GDP.
It’s all downhill from here. And I don’t mean in a good way. Our path towards socialism is only making it worse, to the point where we are actually going to end up worse off than other socialist countries, because we’re starting from a baseline of higher debt load.
No, we have the current crisis because the controls created during the GD were systematically dismantled over the last 30 years.
I wonder then if this guy occasionally wonders where his paycheck is coming from, being that the “company” he heads apparently doesn’t exist.
Or this guy.
Or this woman, head of another bankrupt 1930’s organization that apparently no longer exists.
after the 1930’s we were able to postpone the inevitable until now, due to several factors:
So it was ‘different then’, eh? They were working on a ‘new paradigm’? I thought that was the one thing we all agreed was never true.
Sure is funny how the ‘inevitable’ was so successfully postponed, right up until we deregulated Wall Street. (’Freeing’ the markets, ha ha.)
Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-05 12:38:09
No, we have the current crisis because the controls created during the GD were systematically dismantled over the last 30 years.
—————–
Bingo, eco!!!!
BTW, for all the “capitalists” who decry regulation and taxes, can you point to a single country where people pay no taxes, and all the infrastructure is provided and paid for strictly by the private sector?
It would really help your cause if you could point to **just one** successful example.
Rather it’s a huge play on buzzwords.
When reviewing the red menace in absence of some ideological BS, the USSR didn’t practice anything remotely close to communism. In fact, it was much more similar to what we became with the supply side/corporatist menance…. a power structure of elitists who maintain power by tossing just enough to the proletariat to maintain civility.
That’s not communism my friends.
While the USSR certainly tried it’s best, and was in fact a communist state ruled by a single party.. the communist party.. one has to wonder if true communism can exist in the real world.
Well, imo, it can’t. Nor can socialism… which is why they are doomed to failure.
Another lame play on labels and buzzwords. Irrespective of the label you assign to elitism, it will always be elitism. And to apply your assertion evenly, the “capitalism” buzzword is doomed to fail but that matters only those who are stuck on buzzwords.
..and “elitism” is not a buzzword.. ?
“supply side/corporatist menance” ..not buzzwords..
“a power structure of elitists”.. not buzzwords..
Tossing scraps to the “proletariat”.. no buzzwords in there either.
Obstinacy gets you nowhere Joey.
Call it what you want, balance of power, power structure, statist construct.
bah.. you run out of ammo so quickly these days i may have to search out a more worthy antagonist.
Here’s the thing about true socialists. While all they crave is power for themselves, they must disguise that fact..
They know how hard it is to gain power and wealth in a capitalist society. Few people can manage it.
Without the cooperation of the poor “proletariat”, capitalism cannot be overthrown, and socialist intelligentsia are relegated to the back rooms of universities and the liberal press, preaching revolution to the masses.
They want to rule. Capitalism must be overthrown regardless of the pain and suffering it causes.. no matter if the false philosophy they peddle is a proven failure over and over. They care about nothing and no one but themselves.
They think they will become the elite once socialism takes hold. Chances are they will be just murdered along with anyone else who’s presents a threat to the power of the strong arms, as always happens.
The truth is that the USSR did not practice communism…. and you continue to duck weave and run from that fact.
Nobody practices communism. Communism and socialism are “ideals”. They cannot be lived up to.
The collective society cannot work simply because humans are incapable of it. It goes against their nature. We, unlike ants and bees, have an individual survival instinct, not a community survival instinct.
As is capitalism.
And your point was what?
Capitalism is functioning as intended. There should exist people from rich to poor and everything in between, depending on where they want to be and their aptitude and capacity to get there.
Socialism does not function as intended. Under socialism everyone is equally poor with no hope of bettering themselves or their society.
I would say “take your pick” but you already have.. and now you can have the last word.
Joey….. GS was right when he said you’re the king of strawmen. You really are and like everything else, you run from that fact too.
Capitalism is functioning as intended. There should exist people from rich to poor and everything in between, depending on where they want to be and their aptitude and capacity to get there.
Socialism does not function as intended. Under socialism everyone is equally poor with no hope of bettering themselves or their society.
———————–
Joey,
Where is this “capitalism” functioning? Certainly, you can’t mean the United States! We have a long history of taxing wealth and using the money to provide the infrastructure and security (domestic and international…and this includes “welfare,” BTW) necessary to continue extracting/creating wealth.
Some might argue the “middle class” itself was the ultimate table scrap - a leftover from the days when a lurking red menace kept the West in line.
I have often wondered this myself. No need now for “kitchen debates” with Soviet Premiers.
Through corruption or just plain ignorance, Congress and the Administration have embraced an ideology that has failed every time it has been tried.” ~Peter Schiff
A third possibility is that they are socialists.
people more valued than the people who earned the money in the first place.
wmbz, just who died and made you the judge of who is valued and who deserves money? It seems awfully convenient to me that the ones who think they deserve the money are the ones who — surprise surprise — set up society so that they were the ones who best positioned to make the money.
And if the rich felt that they should only keep it if they MADE it, then surely they wouldn’t object if they let it go after they died. After all, the one who made the money isn’t around anymore, right? Oh wait, no, that’s a death tax, and we can’t have that. No, the rich want their sons to keep the money, either through direct inheritance or through connections at the University of Gentleman’s C. That is, the sons get to keep the money, even if the sons didn’t “earn the money in the first place” at all! Love that self-serving glossed-over contradiction.
(and wmbz, if the second two paragrahs are not your own writing, could you please attribute them to somebody? If not, I’m going to assume it’s you, and comment accordingly.)
I am personally against any death tax.
It’s double taxation. Nothing more, nothing less.
I’m taxed twice on about everything already. Why should dying be any different.
Comment by SV guy
2010-04-05 06:49:31
I am personally against any death tax.
It’s double taxation. Nothing more, nothing less.
Totally agree with this — and I’m a “socialist.”
Dear Oxide,
I have quit working and need your money for beer and cigs and scratch-off games. Can I get your email so I can send you my address so you know where to mail the check? Thank you.
If Schiff is so dubious about ’socialism’, then why is he so heavily invested in China?
Who says China is still socialist? I’d say only Cuba is now truly a socialist country.
Socialism? Relax.
USA, 5% of the world’s population, 25% of the world’s prisoners. One out of every 37 adults current or former prisoner. CSMonitor
The most unequal distribution of wealth of any western, industrialized country.
One third of population with no health insurance or under-insured.
Wages for poor and middle-class declining for 30 years.
Unions busted. 25% under or unemployed.
Debt slavery, prison worker slavery, min. wage slavery.
No pensions, IRAs, 401K’s a joke for most.
Min. wage lower than in the 50s.
Top tax bracket 70% in 1975, 35% now. No tax on wealth.
Bailouts for the Rich. No prison time for rich. Rich got richer.
Yea buddy, we’re a real socialistic Sweden here.
A few folks around here really don’t let the facts bother them. Distant relatives to Goebbles or Edward Bernays, probably.
And almost all have a very poor grasp of the English language despite being born in America.
—————————————————–
USA, 5% of the world’s population, 25% of the world’s prisoners. One out of every 37 adults current or former prisoner. CSMonitor
Rio you forgot
The top 400 wage earners only paid 16% effective tax rate this year.
Bill communism may be the extreme form of socialism but socialism is not communism. Most of Europe is considered socialistic vs say the US. China certianly would be considered socialistic, even more so than Europe. Also we shouldn’t confuse socialism vs no socialism with democracy vs totalitarian governments.
The Government Accountability Office said 72 percent of all foreign corporations and about 57 percent of U.S. companies doing business in the United States paid no federal income taxes for at least one year between 1998 and 2005.
More than half of foreign companies and about 42 percent of U.S. companies paid no U.S. income taxes for two or more years in that period, the report said.
During that time corporate sales in the United States totaled $2.5 trillion, according to Democratic Sens. Carl Levin of Michigan and Byron Dorgan of North Dakota, who requested the GAO study.
The report did not name any companies. The GAO said corporations escaped paying federal income taxes for a variety of reasons including operating losses, tax credits and an ability to use transactions within the company to shift income to low tax countries…
Dorgan in a statement called the report “a shocking indictment of the current tax system.” Levin said it made clear that “too many corporations are using tax trickery to send their profits overseas and avoid paying their fair share in the United States.”
The study showed about 28 percent of large foreign corporations, those with more than $250 million in assets, doing business in the United States paid no federal income taxes in 2005 despite $372 billion in gross receipts, the senators said. About 25 percent of the largest U.S. companies paid no federal income taxes in 2005 despite $1.1 trillion in gross sales that year, they said.
See? We DO have socialism! For the rich.
See? We DO have socialism! For the rich.
Don’t fall into this trap, call it what it is corporatism.
You have problem with Corporate Communist Capitalism©®™, comrade?
Who says China is still socialist? I’d say only Cuba is now truly a socialist country
I agree with you that China isn’t a true ’socialist’ country, but it’s exactly a ’socialist’ country in the way Schiff is talking about ’socialism’, his quote:
“More decisions are being made by politicians and lawyers in Washington and fewer by entrepreneurs”
Does anyone think that this doesn’t hold true for China, even more so than the US? Their system is totally mercantile, meaning the gov makes decisions based on what they think is good for their trade. The Chinese gov picks who wins and loses in their system,to a degree far more than occurs here.
Perhaps Schiff is just envious of their slave wages and total lack of environmental regulation and worker/consumer safety?
BINGO
“Our economy is being transformed from a mostly capitalistic one to a mostly socialistic one.,” observes Peter Schiff. “More decisions are being made by politicians and lawyers in Washington and fewer by entrepreneurs……Through corruption or just plain ignorance, Congress and the Administration have embraced an ideology that has failed every time it has been tried.” ~Peter Schiff
Correction - Our economy is being transfomed from a mostly capitalistic one to a corparate controlled one. Most decisions are being made by Wall Street, and their henchmen in gov. Through oligopolies corruption and unlimited campaign contributions this administration, congress, and the last several administrations and congresses have been corrupted.
Again in socialism public ownership is for the good of the people not the good of the elite. If done correctly it can stimulate competition by limiting corporate monopolistic power. Gov management of highways is a perfect example. The health care reform just passed has no public option and can hardly be called socialism. It will pad the pockets of insurance companies thus it is corporatism. Gov takeover of GM bailsout owners and management it does not improve things for the average US citizen or small company. Bailing out Wallstreet was obviously not for the average citizen. What we have now is not socialism, it’s not capitalism, it’s worse (corporatism) .
Nailed it dude. At this point the only power strong enough to tip the scales back would be the military and I don’t see anything happening there while they are tied down by having 2 wars and hundreds of bases spread out over the world. The public is powerless to push back. Go with the flow.
Tip toeing around the China question.
Treasury Secretary Geithner will not meet the April 15th deadline to determine if China’s currency is “misaligned” with the U.S. dollar.
“We are disappointed, but not surprised, by the administration’s decision,” Senator Charles Schumer a New York Democrat, said in an e-mailed statement yesterday. “After five years of stonewalling, punctuated by occasional, but halting action by the Chinese, we have lost faith in bilateral negotiations on this issue.”
Schumer, along with four other senators including South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham, last month introduced legislation to require the Treasury to determine if there is a distortion between the Chinese currency and that of the United States. Parity
If Schumer, Lindsey, and others force the Chinese to change their peg to the U.S. dollar those “cheap goods from China” won’t be cheap any more. However, from the perspective of China stuff in America will be cheaper to buy.
For anybody who is having a hard time rationalizing the US/China dynamic, here is another example.
If you are a renter, go to your landlords home. Kick in the front door. Get in their face and explain to him or her “how the cow eats cabbage”. I profess no love for China but let’s be clear. We in the good ole USA are the nutless tiger in this scenario.
Right. And now the morons in DC are beginning to wake up to the fact that their idiotic cheerleading for “free trade” may end up putting them on the unemployement line, just like regular old J6P.
Talk is cheap. But maybe they are waking up to the fact that when the plankton dies off, so do the whales.
Also note that china will not be buying our treasuries, if this occurs.
Changes take effect Monday, providing standard paperwork and deadlines in hopes of streamlining the process for sellers and buyers.
By Kimberly Miller
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 7:54 p.m. Friday, April 2, 2010
New Treasury Department rules to streamline short sales go into effect Monday, giving sellers, buyers and Realtors hope that the grueling process of getting bank approvals will soon ease.
In a short sale, a lender agrees to sell a home for less than is owed on the mortgage, usually because the borrower cannot afford the loan payments and is headed for foreclosure.
But assembling the paperwork needed for a short sale and getting the bank to sign off on an offer can be a months-long ordeal that often ends in buyers walking away in frustration.
The new rules, outlined in the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program, require participating lenders to respond to preapproved offers within 10 business days, provide for standardized paperwork, and offer monetary incentives to servicers and lenders. The program also allows lenders to consider deeds in lieu of foreclosure.
“The biggest problem we’ve had in the past is lack of cooperation from the lenders and no uniform set of rules,” said Realtor Craig Fialkowski of Herman Group Real Estate in Palm Beach Gardens.
“Nobody does anything the same.”
Five years ago, Fialkowski had no short sale listings. Now they make up half of his business, he said.
With Monday’s rule changes, a lender must offer the short sale program if a struggling borrower doesn’t qualify for a modification under the federal Making Home Affordable program.
But Peter Zalewski, a principal with Miami research and brokerage firm Condo Vultures, said the rules won’t solve the foreclosure crisis anytime soon.
Banks are already turning to short sales because foreclosing on a home has become a lengthy and expensive endeavor, he said.
Plus, there’s going to be a learning curve.
“In theory, all the new rules are a great thing,” Zalewski said. “In practicality, they will not resolve the problem in the foreseeable future.”
West Palm Beach Realtor Jared Dalto, who deals almost exclusively in short sales, agrees.
Because property values dropped so dramatically in Florida, Dalto said, it’s difficult to get lenders to take substantial losses, even with small monetary incentives.
“When the losses are so big, it’s like climbing Everest,” Dalto said. “When negotiations happen in short sales, it’s all about money.”
Under the plan, borrowers are eligible for $3,000 in relocation expenses and will not be required to pay the remainder of the loan to the first mortgage lender.
There’s even something in the plan for Realtors, whose commissions cannot be reduced by the bank after an offer on a property has been received.
What may be most critical in the new rules is the time element.
Fialkowski said buyers don’t want to wait months to hear back about their offers. Also, the value of the property — at least in recent years — can dramatically decline in the time it takes for a bank to respond.
“If they have to wait, they’re going to disappear,” Fialkowski said.
At the same time, he’s not sure 10 days is a realistic response time for lenders.
“I can’t get them to even pick up the phone for 10 days, let alone get an answer on something,” he said.
More people want to buy real estate, but don’t think prices have bottomed out
by Kim Miller
An annual real estate survey by Stuart-based Cotton & Company found that more people are considering buying property this year than in 2009, but aren’t sure the market has hit bottom yet.
The survey, which includes responses from 972 people, showed 44 percent of respondents said they may buy this year, compared to 36 percent last year. Of those, 56 percent say the purchase would be of a primary home, while 40 percent said the purchase would be an investment.
At the same time though, 29 percent of people said they are waiting for better pricing, while 32 percent said they aren’t buying because they can’t sell their current home first.
“There is a huge number of buyers sitting on the fence waiting,” said Stephann Cotton, president of Cotton & Company. “People are thinking there will be a sign saying ‘OK, the market is back.’”
Cotton said the survey, in its second year, was conducted to measure people’s thoughts about the market and get a sense of what the future might hold.
About 60 percent of people polled said the market has not reached bottom. Price reductions of between 20 percent and 40 percent, however, would motivate about 55 percent of respondents to buy immediately if they could.
“Nobody predicted how severe the bottom would be, why would anybody be able to predict how we get out of it,” Cotton said. “We ride the market, we can’t steer it.”
“There is a huge number of buyers sitting on the fence waiting,”
How does the huge number of fence sitters measure up against the ginormous shadow inventory?
PB they didn’t say anything about the size of this group. The money quote was that if prices dropped 40% that about half would consider buying “if they could”
Appraisers say cheaper valuations open door for short-sale abuses
By Kimberly Miller
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Posted: 9:20 p.m. Saturday, April 3, 2010
A run-up in housing prices contributed to the downfall of real estate, but now some appraisers fear low-ball valuations could lead to the next market muddle.
They say a new federal rule to speed up short sales will increase banks’ reliance on broker price opinions — cheaper, quicker and unregulated home valuations that some argue could lead to an emerging type of mortgage fraud called “flopping.”
Banks have increasingly used Realtors to do broker price opinions, or BPOs, to set list prices as the market swelled with short sales.
A short sale is when the bank agrees to accept less money for a home than the borrower owes on the loan.
Already losing money on the deal, a lender can pay a Realtor as little as $40 for a BPO and avoid a professional appraisal bill of about $350 to $500.
The new Treasury Department rule that goes into effect Monday streamlines the process for short sales, in part, by requiring participating banks to accept purchase offers that meet preapproved list prices, which can be determined by a BPO.
It’s all very dense, but consider a $1 million home that is inaccurately valued at $700,000, then sold at that amount. The bank is out the $300,000, and neighborhood values decline.
“If you pay an agent $50 to $85 to do the job of an appraiser who does it for $400 to $500, how much time and accuracy do you think you’re going to get?” said Realtor Jared Dalto of West Palm Beach-based Seawinds Realty .
Realtors who do BPOs argue appraisers are just angry about losing business. They say a BPO can actually be more accurate in some cases because Realtors know area market trends better than appraisers.
“We’re on the street every day. I’m seeing what’s happening,” said Realtor Frank Verna, who specializes in distressed property sales in northern Palm Beach County. “An appraiser may do a more in-depth study, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s correct.”
Another concern voiced by appraisers is that an agent doing a BPO could have a conflict of interest to assign a specific value to a property to help it sell.
The issue was stressed in March letters to Treasury Department officials from national appraisal groups, which noted concern that using BPOs exclusively could increase “flopping.”
The definition of flopping varies, but it generally includes a BPO assigning a lesser value to a home, which is then sold by the bank based on the discounted value. The buyer then flips the property, selling it at its true market value and giving a kickback to the Realtor who did the original BPO.
Palm Beach County Realtors and mortgage brokers interviewed for this story said they haven’t encountered flopping here, but Peter Zalewski, a principal with the Miami research and brokerage firm Condo Vultures, said he sees it in his area.
“It’s definitely happening,” Zalewski said. “If you have access and information, you can put a spread on anything today, and buyers are coming in with cash, which means there is no need for an appraisal.”
The definition of flopping varies, but it generally includes a BPO assigning a lesser value to a home, which is then sold by the bank based on the discounted value. The buyer then flips the property, selling it at its true market value and giving a kickback to the Realtor who did the original BPO.”
I would like to see a reality show on this
It’s a sad little world when some knucklehead realtor so easily outwits our seasoned bankers with their armies of financiers & lawyers.
As paperwork piles up, so does desperation.
The Palm Beach Post
Don Cameron’s March 8 win in a Palm Beach County home auction is stalled somewhere on the third floor of the courthouse in stacks of foreclosure filings piled several feet overhead.
He’d like to start fixing up the three-bedroom house, renovate the kitchen, maybe get it ready for a first-time home buyer hoping to cash in on the waning days of the $8,000 tax credit.
But nearly a month after his $74,570 purchase, which he is required to pay for in full by noon the next day, the massive backlog of foreclosures in the Palm Beach County Clerk and Comptroller’s Office still has him waiting for the home’s title.
Despite tripling the number of employees who handle foreclosures, and scanning a feverish 30,000 case pages into the computer every day, staff can’t keep up with what amounted to about 2,500 foreclosures each month last year. (In all of 2005, there were 3,049 foreclosures in the county).
By statute, the clerk can’t release a title for 10 days, but waiting up to 60 days to claim ownership is cutting into Cameron’s profit margin and, some say, the economic recovery.
Getting foreclosures back on the market means paychecks for people who do renovations.
Buyers will purchase furniture and accessories.
Real estate and property taxes get paid.
“We can’t do anything. We can’t get our money back, we can’t work on the property, we can’t sell the property, we can’t market the property,” said Cameron, owner of real estate investment company Hi-Land Properties, a West Palm Beach subsidiary of We Buy Ugly Houses. “It’s a domino effect.”
Apparently the “desperation” in the headline is “desperate to slap a layer of paint on this shack, and flip it to someone for a quick buck”.
EXTEND & PRETEND: Hitting the Maturity Wall!
How long can the government continue to extend & pretend? How long can public policy endlessly ‘kick-the-can’ down the road without addressing the underlying causes? Such a critical point is often academically referred to as a ‘Tipping Point’ or what newsletter writer John Mauldin refers to as a ‘Finger of Instability’. I am more pragmatic and as an investor, who is forced to call the timing, I refer to it as the Maturity Wall.
http://home.comcast.net/~lcmgroupe/2010/Article-Extend_Pretend-Hitting_the_Maturity_Wall.htm
wmbz,
Nice article, I hate the message but its good to see what’s coming. Thanks for sharing.
Lip
PS: At least I can laugh while I watch the Cubs play. Oh Lord is it going to be a good year for us Sox fans.
Taxes on hotel rooms are rising
USA Today
More cities, counties and states are looking to raise taxes on hotel rooms as they battle budget shortfalls and cuts in services.
Among those increasing taxes or considering it: Baltimore; Scottsdale, Ariz.; Santa Clara, Calif.; and Connecticut.
Taxing visitors is an old habit for local governments. Revenue from taxes on hotel rooms and rental cars have been used to fund tourism promotion, build stadiums and repair roads.
While the taxes can infuriate travelers, they’re seen as a politically palatable option in tough economic times.
“The government entities are hurting financially and are looking for creative means to generate more revenue,” says Trisha Pugal, CEO of Wisconsin Innkeepers Association.
A report by the National Business Travel Association last year says taxes for a single night at the national average room rate of $95.61 were $13.12. The combined lodging taxes levied by state, county and city averaged 13.73%. Tax rates ranged from 10.05% in Burbank to 17.91% in New York.
Taxes/fees on Rental Cars is also insane.
Last Weekend.
My 2 day rental car cost - $71.80
After taxes and fees -$99.89
Almost 40% !!!!!!!
Yep, everything will/is being zapped with a tax increases.
Also the IRS announced it will be doubling it’s number of tax audits, trying to scrap up as many tax cheat bucks as possible. I suggest they start with the 535 in D.C.
Of which I hear 200 are millionaires.
Inflation.
Direct taxes such as these are counted towards CPI (and rightly so).
ABC radio report this morning: “Oil over $85.00 due to U.S. economic recovery”
If I were in the mood and money position to gamble short, I would give the oil rally on the back of the extend-and-pretend recovery news a look.
Oil hits 18-month high on economic outlook
Christopher Johnson
LONDON
Mon Apr 5, 2010 7:55am EDT
Related News
LONDON (Reuters) - U.S. crude futures hit an 18-month high on Monday, climbing toward $86 per barrel on expectations of faster-than-expected economic recovery and increasing demand for fuel.
…
Yep - seems like a bad play. However I’m kicking myself for selling USO last year at $35, thinking the same thing - it’s now at $42.
Thar is too funny!! I have family members who are tied to construction business and when I talked to them yesterday they were worried. My bother-in-law that lives down in Surf City NC. Has a great business being a stuctural engineer and owns he own business. His business has fallen off 80%. My brother-in-law is very respected and has many project under his belt. Last year he business was going strong but not this year.
Just imagine how well the recovery will be doing once oil hits $100 and then $200.
I guess they think the consumer to be an optional part of a consumer economy? The gov’t will do all the heavy lifting?
The last time gasoline was this pricey was before the furloughs, pay freezes, layoffs, and wage reductions took bite. It’ll be interesting to see how long this goes on.
It is interesting when people talked as if oil prices revolved around free market principles.
+1 Natalie.
Hey, I wonder if those “ghost ships” are still anchored off of Singapore.
WSJ had an article about how new pickup truck sales have risen somewhat. Businesses (including self-employed) buy 75% of all pickup trucks.
They do make for some interesting photos, especially at night.
Sheesh…When I was a kid, I just thought the US Commodity Futures Market were for farmers to insure a reasonable price on future crops, pork bellies piglets or something and not all out gambling and speculation ?
Psst..Psst…Hey, has anyone got any non-Monsanto Sweet Crude seeds laying around ?
“It is interesting when people talked as if oil prices revolved around free market principles.”
I live in the energy capital of the world, and a truer statement was never made.
Oil prices are manipulated from well to pump.
ITEM: “U.S. consumers plan to spend as much as $14 billion on candy-filled baskets, lamb dinners and colored eggs for the Easter holiday weekend, a sign that non-essential purchases are re-bounding”. Easter Spending
~ Encouraging! (??) American consumers are returning to their old habit of buying stuff they don’t need with money they don’t have. Is this a signal the worst is over and we’ll soon be back on the great spending spree?
How I spent Easter…by mikey.
I refused to go to church with my g/f and sipped coffee and Bailey’s Cream while working.
I washed 13 casual and dress shirts, 9 pair of jeans, 14 white n’ colored T-shirts and a ton of socks and shorts. Then I moved on to towels, sheets and things. For a guy, I do go through a lot of towels but I’m always a happy guy in the shower and always squeaky clean. I also blame my g/f a lot for the mountain of dirty towels because she visits.
Between my dryer and balacony, mikey’s little castle looked like a medievel gypsy fair with things waving, dangling and flapping. I had to keep a rough count of things as I didn’t want to go to church and eat with my g/f’s family and I said that I was busy.
Hey, it was either that or get my bottle of Jack Daniels, a chair and my 45 then shot whatever moved or crawled in my closets and clothes hampers. This happens ever spring.
Then later, I went over to my g/f’s for a drink and a meal. I gave her a little present just to be safe, then teased her about all the dirty bath towels she leaves me with. She thanked me then punched me…hard. She was a little angry because she didn’t get to comb my hair, get me into a silly suit and into church with her and her family. I got some jelly beans and a chocolate egg out of the deal and then we messed up a few of her towels.
I’ve had worse days and I am safe from church, her entire weird family and most moving and crawling things in my closets, dressers and clothes hampers…for a while at least.
End of my Happy Easter story
While I find that number both impressive and frightening, I doubt it that is a real indicator of a potential discretionary spending spree.
Like Christmas gifts, it’s probably a bit harder to do away completely with Easter goodies for the kids. Not hard to rationalize a little splurge.
It is also a big family/friends get together day, even for the non-religious… (I think Easter and Christmas are about the only days it’s hard to find an open store in NYC… All the other holidays, seem to be excuses for sales.)
JOEYINCALIF - on last night’s post you inquired about my fair share of the pie analogy. Your example contained a few premises that I was not using (which in a nutshell is the problem with many forms of socialistic ideology): (i) my fictional pie is not a zero sum game (i.e., when it comes to standards of living, it is not true that there are only X number of units to be distributed - the harder, smarter and more productive people work, the more units are created, and (2) my concept of “fair share” has abosolutely nothing to do with equal but much more to do with the amount taken v. the amount contributed in making the pie (albeit I do believe in reallocation for certain amounts of lack of contribution - e.g., I personally believe in minimum shares per person out of compassion, and compensation for extraordinary circumstances such as severe physical and/or mental impairment and temporary assistance for job loss, education, and escaping abusive environments).
thanks.. that pretty much clears it up.
I’m not anxious to go deeper. We’ve all got an opinion about who deserves what, and the line between charity and entitlement is blurry.
We dropped our land line a year ago, didn’t need it, have two cell phones and don’t have a Fax machine.
AT&T plans up to 100 more job cuts in Birmingham
The Birmingham News
AT&T Corp. plans to cut as many as 100 more jobs from the Birmingham area, according to union representatives.
The Communications Workers of America Local 3902 in Birmingham has been told there is a surplus of employees in the telephone customer service department that serves the traditional land-line business, said Rhonda Taylor, president of the local.
“They are devastated,” Taylor said, speaking of the workers in the telephone customer support unit that are awaiting to hear of their fate. “It is Easter and they are supposed to be celebrating.”
The union contract — a new version of which was signed last month and is good for three years — permits AT&T to declare personnel surpluses and adjust accordingly. Dallas-based AT&T, the largest local and long-distance company in the republic, is the largest U.S. employer of union labor. But priorities are shifting: The company has lost 25 percent of its land lines in the past three years as wireless phones take over.
“Some parts of our business are growing and adding jobs,” said AT&T spokesman Marty Richter. “Others are shedding jobs as they decline. There just aren’t as many customer phone calls anymore about billing, new orders or repairs.”
Those poor workers. It’s not as if anyone IN THE BUSINESS could have foreseen land line services being less needed as time marches on.
Ah well, it’s nothing a healthy dose of socialism can’t fix..
dang.. i’m on some kinda socialist kick this am.. must be the rain after a few sunny days.. it brings me down… need to go to Vegas or something..
It’s not only land line service reductions, it’ the fact that these jobs can be done from anywhere - India, perhaps.
..had a nice chat with the Indian guy that assisted me last time. He wanted to see the Golden Gate Bridge someday, and I said I’d like to see the Taj Mahal. The guy was so polite and apologetic i finally told him to shaddap about it.. just get the job done.
Fine customer service as long as a heavy accent doesn’t cause interference.
The only safe telco jobs are those that require actual hands-on. All the rest can be outsourced.
Here in California hundreds of non-hands-on telco jobs have been systematically stripped from our expensive state and sent to cheaper locales.
Copper is gone and so goes splicers, IR and most of aerial construction.
“Hey, baby, I’m your telephone man
You just show me where you want it and I’ll put it where I can
I can put it in the bedroom, I can put it in the hall
I can put it in the bathroom, I can hang it on the wall
You can have it with a buzz, you can have it with a ring
And if you really want it, you can have a ding-a-ling
Because-a hey baby, I’m your telephone man”
From “Telephone Man” by Meri Wilson, 1977
Verizon is spending billions to put in fiber to curb every where.
Copper is not gone. It was moved to infrastructure eg cat 6 cat7.
It is funny though fiber costs less than copper per foot but the switches costs alot more. When fiber switches and routers come down that will be the end off copper.
Copper is gone and so goes splicers, IR and most of aerial construction.
Some fiber is done aerial actually; though in general less so than copper.
I used to work in the FTTH biz, and one of the interesting aspects is that the protocol is so sensitive that not only does it have to adjust it’s send/receive timing of the data based on the length of the fiber, but it even has to make occasional timing adjustments due to the shortening and lengthening of aerial fiber during the day due to daytime temperature changes!
(P.S. Guess I’m just restating what you did, since you said “most of aerial”.)
Huge difference between aerial copper and fiber. Obviously the throughput of fiber but the actual weights and volumes of fiber has shutdown many telco garages in the last 10 years. I noticed back in the mid to late 90’s that the local ma bell stopped maintaining copper. And I mean flat out stopped. Squirrel guard falling off, lashing wire hanging in the road, $hit and debris hanging of leaded cable and PIC.
need to go to Vegas or something..
It’s windy and raining here.
“We dropped our land line a year ago, didn’t need it, have two cell phones and don’t have a Fax machine.”
When we eventually move, I am going to give Magic Jack a try before deciding whether to sign up for another land line. My parents tried Vonage and it didn’t work out, but my sister used Magic Jack from Australia to call the US, and it sounded like she was calling from next door. Adding to the incentive to try an alternative is the fact that AT&T recently raised the cost of our plan by $5/mo. I am not surprised they’re hurting.
One word: Skype.
Skype is good. I also use United World Telecom.
Little known fact: when the power goes down, your land line will still work as it operates from its own power supply.
Never give up your land line.
Second, if you have DSL, you have a land line. DSL is still the most affordable, broadband IP for most people.
Third, land lines have full duplex whereas most cell systems don’t. Too much bandwidth, ya know?
Fourth, the new AT7T Uverse system is superior to cable and it uses… wires.
The true next best wireless thing is 4G WiMax.
Third, land lines have full duplex whereas most cell systems don’t.
Actually they don’t. Well - they’re “full duplex” but they still use shared bandwidth, for which they compete. Pretty much all telecom systems now use concentration at some point in their network, usually so between the subscribers and the local central office, and always between offices. I worked on the access side, so I know. Most providers allow 3-4 subscribers per channel, but often it’s 7-8. Thus for instance in a system with 1000 subscribers (say a given section of town) only 150 or so may be able to make phone calls at the same times, the 151st will get no dial tone.
However generally the concentration level is higher in cell networks, since they’re usually minutes based still whereas land lines rarely are, and also for battery reasons; it’s still more common for someone to be on their phone for a 1-2 hour stretch on their home line than on a cell line.
(I worked in the biz for 15 years)
P.S. you are correct w/regards to the land line being powered. Though that’s not as meaningful as it used to be, for a few reasons:
- Many “land lines” now use local powering - e.g. Verizon’s FiOS (I think about 5 million lines now) uses in-home powering, with 8 hours of battery; after that no go.
- Often other non-FiOS copper lines have remote battery power, in rural and many suburban areas. In this case there is a battery in a remote cabinet that will eventually run down. I think they’re generally long-lasting, though not sure how long.
- Lots of people now use only battery-powered cordless phones even if they have a solid land line, and some don’t think to keep a spare “old” phone around that doesn’t require a wall plug-in (always a good idea!).
All true packman. I was just speaking in general, although I had forgotten about the concentrators.
A statewide open house. Yeah, that will do it. The smell of fresh-baked cookies will be everywhere.
http://www.news-journalonline.com/business/real-estate/2010/04/05/florida-realtors-plan-statewide-open-house.html
Hurry…. buy! Everyone is doing it across the entire state!!! Get yours B4 they’re all gone.
And the truth? The world is for sale and there are no buyers.
Maybe it’s just me, but I would think it smelled of desperation. How can somebody involved in the event think it’s a great time to buy when it is so in your face that they need you to buy today because prices will drop tomorrow. On a side note, during my own personal open house tour yesterday, there seemed to be several homeowners that fired their agents and when you walked in and asked about the price, they give you a number and said this is the minimum no agent number we can agree to and we want to close this week, otherwise, we have to let it go into foreclosure. I have not really seen this before.
As if the buyer is going to overpay, just to save the seller from foreclosure. And it has to be done “this week?” Did they not get the memo that they aren’t in a position to make demands anymore? Tell ‘em you’ll snap up the home on the courthouse steps next week.
I am not a total monster. I usually just submit an offer once in foreclosure at a price I feel comfortable with. It is usually about 25% less than they want. The banks usually fax back appraisals based on noncomparables, e.g., better streets, better condition, etc. I fax back rental statistics. No takers yet, but I am getting closer each month as they now want to discuss it and tell me the final offer they will accept (recently about 10% less) rather than faxing back in bold letters FU.
Natalie-
I read your follow up post to me from yesterday. Thank you. I as well, enjoy the world of Documentaries and so forth. Haven’t heard of Errol Morris, but I’ll look him up tonight.
Zeus Matuze
In a communications class, we skated through Edward Bernays and his “Engineering Of Consent”. It wasn’t until real adulthood, I got an interest in his body of work. Evil Genius.
..and thanks to the greatest mind programming inventions ever created (Newspapers/and soon to be RTV/film), his concepts were highly successful.
But is was radio and moving pictures that sealed the deal.
Calif. climate law under assault in poor economy
SACRAMENTO, Calif.AP – Four years ago, California earned accolades for adopting a law that would slash its greenhouse gas emissions and serve as a model for national climate change legislation.
With the state mired in a crippling recession, the law that once looked like a landmark achievement is coming under assault. The regulatory effort Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger set in motion is facing a political backlash and could come to an abrupt halt in the months ahead.
A coalition of businesses, financed largely by three Texas oil companies, is funding a ballot petition that would delay the law until California’s current unemployment rate is cut by more than half.
Leading Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman has vowed she would suspend the law on her first day in office, which she would have the authority to do.
Even Schwarzenegger, who has staked his legacy on environmental issues, has begun urging air regulators to take a go-slow approach. But he has vowed to fight the ballot initiative.
The possibility that a state that has set the national agenda on environmental change for decades might shelve its highly publicized climate regulations could have ramifications beyond California’s borders. In Congress, lawmakers are struggling to craft a national climate bill that uses California’s as a template, but are facing headwinds of their own.
“This could very well be an effort to focus on California with the goal of delaying federal legislation,” said state Sen. Fran Pavley, D-Agoura Hills, one of the law’s authors.
At issue: Whether imposing costly regulations on businesses is a smart move as the nation struggles to emerge from recession.
Under the measure, oil refineries, manufacturers, cement plants, utilities and other carbon polluters are to begin cutting their emissions in 2012.
Let’s see, didn’t the last auto factory in Cali just announce it is being closed?
Yeah, if they all close and get moved to Mexico, China, Texas, or some other foreign country. California can brag about having cut industrial greenhouse emissions by 100%.
Mission Accomplished.
RAHN: Learning from what works
Low taxes and financial privacy laws should be emulated
Richard W. Rahn ~ Washington Times ~ ZURICH
Economists, political scientists, reporters and pundits spend too much of their time looking at dysfunctional societies and trying to explain why there are poverty, joblessness and hopelessness. In many ways, Haiti is easy to explain - no rule of law and 200 years of corrupt and incompetent governments. Switzerland is the polar opposite. It has almost no corruption and has the rule of law with honest, competent judges and government administrators. The question should be, “What can we learn from the Switzerlands of the world about how to do things right” rather than, “What is wrong with the Haitis of the world?” Switzerland manages to run a smaller government as a share of gross domestic product than the United States and most other countries while providing a higher level of service, security, prosperity and freedom. How does it do that?
In many ways, Switzerland seems unlikely to be such a long-term global success story. It is a small country with religious and language differences; nevertheless, the Swiss have managed to live peaceably together for a long time. It has few natural resources, yet it has managed to have one of the highest per capita incomes in the world. It has a world-class health care system, which is privately run. Health care insurance is subsidized, and everyone has access regardless of income, but there is no “public option.”
Switzerland is not perfect, but it is clean, prosperous, well-managed, pleasant, humane and very free. In the more than three decades I have been coming to Switzerland, I have been convinced that the United States and the rest of the world can learn from many things the Swiss have done. The Swiss are practical rather than ideological, but they do revere liberty. They protect private property and free markets and restrain themselves from rampant deficit spending. The Swiss maintain a sound currency, which has been rising against the euro, dollar and pound. Capital, goods and services, with few exceptions, move freely into and out of the country.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/31/learning-from-what-works/
Do they have a national health system?
Swiss are required to purchase basic health insurance, which covers a range of treatments detailed in the Federal Act. It is therefore the same throughout the country and avoids double standards in healthcare. Insurers are required to offer this basic insurance to everyone, regardless of age or medical condition. They may not make a profit off this basic insurance, but can on supplemental plans.[1]
Regulations also restrict the allowable policies and profits that a private insurer may offer, as noted by healthcare economics scholar Uwe Reinhardt in a review in JAMA. Reinhardt writes that,
“To compete in the market for compulsory health insurance, a Swiss health insurer must be registered with the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, which regulates health insurance under the 1994 statute. The insurers were not allowed to earn profits from the mandated benefit package, although they have always been able to profit from the sale of actuarially priced supplementary benefits (mainly superior amenities).
Regulations require “a 25-year-old and an 80-year-old individual pay a given insurer the same premium for the same type of policy..Overall, then, the Swiss health system is a variant of the highly government-regulated social insurance systems of Europe..that rely on ostensibly private, nonprofit health insurers that also are subject to uniform fee schedules and myriad government regulations.”[2]
see wikipedia
Regulations also restrict the allowable policies and profits that a private insurer may offer
Sounds like the Swiss hate liberty to me.
Hard to believe they deny people the right to miserable and chronic illness.
Damn commies.
. Switzerland is the polar opposite. It has almost no corruption and has the rule of law with honest, competent judges and government administrators
As I recall swiss banks participate in many crimes by hiding the money. They may be one of the most corrupt states on the planet in dollar terms.
Er, sort of. They basically adhere to neutrality and believe that you have the right to privacy of your money.
That’s not to say I’m sure there wasn’t plenty of don’t ask, don’t tell, but just because one country says they are hiding money doesn’t mean they really are.
FWIW - Though I agree with most of what Switzerland does, I don’t view it as much of a case study on economic or political systems. It’s quite a tiny country by population standards - less than the population of North Carolina. As stated it doesn’t really have a production-based economy, instead relying heavily on tourism and banking - two things that in general worldwide are heavily weighted towards strong growth the last several decades. It also has a very homogeneous population.
In one aspect though I think that they’re an excellent case study. There’s a reason why Germany stayed out of Switzerland during WWII, even though it’s a bordering country.
They also really heavily on superior engineering which is then licensed.
Yeah I meant to include that. The ITU is HQ there - that’s a big plus.
In the end - they’re pretty much the ultimate “service” economy.
So the ongoing saga of buying a GSE foreclosure.
We hired a buyers agent(commission paid by seller) and came to a side agreement that she’d be compensated at a rate based on the full asking price irrespective of actual transaction price. In other words, she has to work the seller to accept our offer (62%) or she earns nothing. As a side note, our new buyers agent called ME yesterday to ask what her own house was worth… I about fell out of my chair when she asked. We’ve had long conversations on the market and pricing and she’s made the statement she’s never had these kind of conversations with buyers before. Anyways the formula is the old one kicking around here; (flat era transaction price)(3.2% inflation/yr)=actual value. Maybe GS can notate it properly but works on excel and calculator. Anyways, MrsExeter and I couldn’t care less if they accept. We like the place *at a price* and not a nickel more.
An interesting tidbit. Fannie and Freddie reps earn a commission on their REO.
“(flat era transaction price)(3.2% inflation/yr)=actual value”
Here is my guess about what you meant:
If a home sold for, say, $120,000 in 1995, then now, fifteen years later, its ‘actual value’ is supposed to be
$120,000*(1.032)^15 = $192,476.
- Is that right?
- Why should this be the case?
P.S. Google doesn’t like $ signs in math formulas, but if you enter
120,000*(1.032)^15
on the search line, it comes back with
120 000 * (1.03200^15) = 192 476.054
That’s precisely what I meant. Why? Could question.
Rather, “good” question.
Four female astronauts rendezvous 50 years after first woman in space.
From The UK Times ~ April 5, 2010
In the finest display of extraterrestrial girl power to date, four women astronauts are preparing to rendezvous in space nearly 50 years after the Soviet Union put the first woman into orbit.
The $100 billion (£66 billion) International Space Station (ISS) is to host the biggest non-Earth gathering of women, with one arriving on board a Russian Soyuz capsule yesterday and three more due to join her this week.
Dorothy Metcalf-Lindenburger, 34, Stephanie Wilson, 43, and Naoko Yamazaki, 39, are set to launch aboard the shuttle Discovery from Kennedy Space Centre at Cape Canaveral, Florida, at 6.21am local time today and dock at the ISS on Wednesday, linking up with Tracy Caldwell Dyson, 40.
While their arrival will set a record for the most women in space, the historic nature of the occasion appears to have slipped under the radar at Nasa. “Maybe that’s a credit to the system, right, that I don’t think of it as male or female?” said Bill Gerstenmaier, Nasa’s associate administrator for space operations, who was unaware of the pending milestone until it was pointed out to him at a press conference.
“I just think of it as a talented group of people going to do their job in space,” he said.
Although 13 American women passed the same Nasa training tests in 1963 as the Mercury 7 — America’s original all-male astronaut team — the space agency refused to admit women to its astronaut ranks until 1978. Valentina Tereshkova was the first women in space in 1963, but it was not until 20 years later that Nasa followed with an American, Sally Ride.
Some porn producer somewhere is probably inquiring about renting time on a “vomit comet,” those airplanes that provide up to 30 seconds of weightlessness as they fly a parabolic arc.
“Lesbian Astronaut Cougars, Part I”
And remember the rules for your “porn name”
-Name of your first dog/cat
-Name of the street you lived on.
X-GS = Tippy Curtis
I crack me up……..
Kim = “Pookie Peabody”
LOL
Fluffy Bremond
OMG, mine is “Molly Ravine”.
Maxine Sums Up The Health Care Bill
“Let me get this straight. We’re going to be gifted with a health care plan written by a committee whose chairman says he doesn’t understand it, passed by a Congress that hasn’t read it but exempts themselves from it, to be signed by a president who also hasn’t read it and who smokes, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn’t pay his taxes, to be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that’s broke. What the hell could possibly go wrong?”
ROTFLMAO! Damn you, wmbz. I gotta clean my desk.
Stocks rise in early trading after Labor Department says employers added 162,000 jobs in March
NEW YORK (AP) — Stocks edged higher Monday following a jobs report that has boosted expectations for the economy.
The Labor Department said Friday that employers added 162,000 jobs in March. It was the biggest gains since the recession began in December 2007. However, the number was fewer than the 190,000 jobs economists forecast.
The stock market was closed Friday so investors didn’t have a chance to trade on the report before the weekend.
Private employers accounted for most of the gains. Temporary government hiring for the 2010 U.S. census did not pad the figures as much as economists had forecast, which helped keep the figure below expectations.
The unemployment rate remained at 9.7 percent for the third straight month.
Always a fly in the ointment…
Currencies
April 5, 2010, 10:32 a.m. EDT
Dollar falls as markets mull payrolls, ISM data
U.S. postpones feared currency report on Chinese yuan
By Deborah Levine, MarketWatch
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — The dollar fell versus the euro, British pound and Japanese yen on Monday, extending losses after the ISM’s services index rose more-than-expected, alongside a big jump in pending home sales.
…
“Dangerous Divergences” Lie ahead
Gary Dorsch ~ Global Money Trends magazine
Apr 5, 2010
“I guess, I should warn you. If I turn out to be particularly clear, you’ve probably mis-understood what I’ve said,” former Federal Reserve chief Alan Greenspan was fond of saying, when he controlled the Fed’s money spigots. For many Fed watchers, it was a great relief when “Easy” Al finally retired from the Fed, since there is nothing more vexing - than correctly interpreting Green-speak.
“Everything depends upon proper listening. Of ten individuals who listen to the same speech or story, each person may well understand it differently, - perhaps only one of them will understand it correctly,” an eighteenth century theologian observed. So it was of great interest, while listening to a March 27th interview on Bloomberg TV, with the maestro, - Mr Greenspan, who is settling into the twilight years of his life-time. This time, Greenspan spoke more clearly, about such arcane subjects such as “Asset Targeting,” and the manipulation of markets.
When asked about his outlook for the US-economy, Greenspan answered by saying everything depends upon the ability of the monetary authorities to influence the direction of the stock market, “Ordinarily, we think of the economy affecting stock prices. I think we miss a very crucial connection here in that this whole economic recovery, as best as I can judge, is to a very large extent, the consequence of the market’s bottoming last March, and coming all the way back-up. It is affecting the whole structure of the economy, as well as creating the usual wealth effect impact,” Greenspan said.
Thus, what Mr Greenspan is describing, is the contours of the monetary policy that he pursued as Fed chief – utilizing the Dow Jones Industrials index as a key instrument of national economic policy. By “actively managing” the direction of stock index futures contracts, the Fed could impact the wealth of tens of millions of US households, and by extension, influence consumer confidence and spending.
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. (AP) — The federal government announced Friday that it is relaxing some rules to make it easier for communities to spend funds on redeveloping abandoned and foreclosed properties.
The changes, effective immediately, will allow cities, counties and states to buy properties in mortgage default and uninhabitable homes with lingering code violations through the $4 billion Neighborhood Stabilization Program.
The program was started in the midst of the nation’s foreclosure crisis, but a year later about a third of more than 300 local governments that got grants have barely made a dent in them, according to a recent report from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Some city, state and county officials say they have had trouble spending the grant money because federal rules are confusing and cash investors have often outbid them for residential properties.
“It became clear to us that the Neighborhood Stabilization Program as originally designed was too restrictive and limited the ability of our local partners to put this funding to work quickly, Mercedes Marquez, HUD’s assistant secretary for community planning and development, said in a statement. “We need to be more flexible so our local partners can respond to market conditions and reverse the effects of foreclosure in these neighborhoods as quickly as possible.”
James Miller, spokesman for the Florida Department of Community Affairs, which got $91 million to distribute to 24 cities and counties, called Friday’s announcement wonderful news.
Office vacancy rate hits 16-year high April 5, 2010 1:26 AM ET
All Thomson Reuters newsNEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. office vacancy rate in the first quarter reached its highest level in 16 years, but the decline in rents eased and crept closer to stabilization, according to a report by real estate research firm Reis Inc.
The U.S. office vacancy rate rose to 17.2 percent, a level unseen since 1994, as the market lost about 11.6 million net square feet of occupied space during the first quarter, according to the report released on Monday. The U.S. vacancy rate inched up 0.2 percentage points from a quarter earlier and was 2 percent higher than a year ago.
16 year. 16 years. Hmmm that was…
…oh yeah, the Savings & Loan disaster.
U.S. government a big commercial real estate player
Washington Post April 5, 2010
Evidence of the federal government’s growing influence on Washington area commercial real estate is illustrated in big deals it is working on both sides of the table: auctioning a 127,000-square-foot Bethesda building previously occupied by the National Institutes of Health and moving to snatch up vast spaces in buildings on the private market that have been vacant for months.
The General Services Administration is seeking to unload the 10-story building that the NIH vacated in 2002 when it consolidated offices into other buildings in Bethesda. The recommended opening bid for the online auction, which runs from April 30 to July 2, is $14 million.
At the same time, federal leasing activity is expanding, according to Jones Lang LaSalle, the real estate firm representing the government. The government signed deals for 750,000 square feet of space in the District in the first quarter of 2010, compared with 670,000 square feet in the city for all of 2009.
The government is taking advantage of the abundance of space in newly constructed buildings going for bargain prices. As leases are up and the government embarks on renovation projects, it is moving agencies into offices in such areas as NoMa, a neighborhood near Capitol Hill that was up and coming before the financial crisis ratcheted down demand for space.
“U.S. government a big commercial real estate player”
Does that explain why CRE is crashing so hard?
lordy lord.. all that space.
Where will they ever find enough bureaucrats to fill it?
You can bet they will try hard.
From the same article today - “February home sales rise 8.2 percent as buyers take advantage of gov’t incentives . . . The number of buyers who agreed to purchase previously occupied homes rose sharply in February, far exceeding expectations, in a sign that the housing market may be coming back from the winter doldrums.” So which is it, recovery or stimulus?
A recoverus.
LOL - kind of like festivus?
Maybe a stimulvery?
I don’t get what this guy is talking about. Doesn’t he realize the Fed operates above the reach of U.S. law?
The Fed Admits To Breaking The Law
Karl Denninger
Now how long will it be before something is done about it?
…
This is the critical problem with all attempts to audit the Fed, or to “regulate” banks or other corporations. The regulo-philes think that government can solve problems with the stroke of a pen, but they completely overlook the tremendous logistical problems of enforcement. Specifically, if they break the law, what are you gonna do?
Banks and corporations, being artificial creatures of the law, don’t respond to incentives or threats as humans would. You can’t put a bank in jail. In fact, the key feature of limited liability in essence puts them– and their owners and executives– above the law from the very beginning.
The only effective way to “regulate” a bank or other corporation is to get RID of it.
Australia puts troops on standby to deal with ‘ticking timebomb’ of oil leak at Great Barrier Reef ~ UK Mail 05th April 2010
Australia’s army and navy have been placed on standby to help stabilise a stricken Chinese ship which is leaking tons of oil and threatening an ecological disaster on the Great Barrier Reef and the prestine Queensland coastline.
As the bulk coal carrier Shen Neng 1 continued to spill oil into the Coral Sea in northern Queensland Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said he would fly over the area tomorrow to examine the dire threat for himself.
The World Wide Fund for Nature said the ship was a ‘ticking environmental time bomb’.
Desperate: Chinese carrier Shen Neng 1 after running aground on the Great Barrier Reef near Great Keppel Island tourist resort
And there were demands from the Liberal opposition for Mr Rudd to take personal control of the salvage operation.
‘Right now, the Prime Minister, this day, should assume personal responsibility and take charge of protecting the Great Barrier Reef’, said opposition environment spokesman Greg Hunt.
The fate of the reef, a major attraction for tourists from around the world, lies in the skills of salvage experts who hope to carry out enough emergency work - perhaps with the help of military personnel - to prevent the 755ft- long ship from breaking up.
But the over-riding fear as the salvage operation to keep the ship afloat continues - with two tugs now in place to stabilise it - is that the calm weather with change for the worse.
Great Keppel Island Chinese Ship on Great Barrier Reef
If that happens, say experts, there appears little doubt that the badly-damaged vessel will break up with disastrous results for the reef and the Queensland coastline.
See, the have these amazing things called “pumps”, “hoses” and “oil barges” or “tankers”. Believe it or not, if you have these things, you can actually pump the Bunker C/diesel out of a ship that has run aground. They been doing it for almost 100 years.
Why does it seem like the MSM makes every incident/accident like it is some kind of “end of world” crisis?
You’ve never heard the old saying “If it bleeds, it leads?”
Montreal (Kitco News) — Demand for rhodium, a key element in catalytic converters, is expected to increase as automobile markets in China and emerging countries continue their rapid growth.
Ford Motor Co., announced today that its first-quarter sales in China leapt 84% from a year and that sales reached a record 153,362. It also said that March sales for India more than tripled from the previous month.
Last week’s announcement that Volvo was bought by China’s Zhejiang Geely Holding Group was a further signal that the Asian auto market is expanding rather than slowing. .
“In China and India, auto sales are skyrocketing; other emerging economies are also seeing strong growth in auto sales,” said Jeffrey Christian, Managing Editor of CPM Group told Kitco News. In the United States auto sales will probably be 10 to 15 per cent higher than they were last year. When you sell a car pretty much anywhere in the
They just recently found a way to make catalytic converters without that metal. Cheaper too.
You’ll have to google it.
I feel like were close to the next breaking point / leg down / other shoe / brown squirt, etc.
Good. It’s when no one is worried that the market tanks “unexpectedly.”
Oh there’s a big old brown squirt a coming, but uncle sugar will rush in with plenty of handi-wipes and depends!
The takers weigh down the makers ~ Washington Examiner:
Here’s a question of vastly more than theoretical importance to current and coming generations of Americans: How much longer can the U.S. economy continue to produce enough wealth to sustain a growing class of people who depend on government for some or all of their daily necessities? To pose the question another way: Are we nearing a point when there are no longer enough taxpayers to support all of the tax consumers in America?
Such questions become increasingly important as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, federal civil service retirement, and legions of state and local pension funds approach their days of reckoning as millions of retiring baby boomers demand far more benefits than those programs have been prepared to pay out. And don’t forget the growing share of personal income that is derived from government transfer payments such as unemployment, veterans benefits, and the like.
If these ruminations sound ominous, they should. Consider this analysis by former Washington Post reporter Thomas Edsall, which appeared recently in the Atlantic: “According to the Federal Bureau of Economic Analysis, the share of total personal income in the United States that comes from government transfer programs — Social Security, Medicare, veterans’ benefits, unemployment compensation, etc. — has grown rapidly over the past six decades, from 5.9 cents of every dollar in 1950 … to 17.3 cents in 2009. In addition, according to BEA, another 9.8 cents of every dollar went, in 2009, to salaries for state, local and federal government employees, a figure that does not include costs of fringe benefits. In other words, more than a quarter of all personal income in the United States is paid for with tax dollars.”
Former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher once said, “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other peoples’ money to spend.”
Mr. Edsall probably couldn’t have gotten such an article published if he’d still been with WaPo.
The takers weigh down the makers
Maybe the takers now weigh down the makers because the makers didn’t sustain for the takers (who once were makers) the opportunity to make.
Maybe the takers now weigh down the makers because the makers didn’t sustain for the takers (who once were makers) the opportunity to make.
Now, now Rio. We all know that anyone who isn’t rich in America is just a lazy welfare queem.
“queem”
Good thing you didn’t slip and hit the “f” key.
“How much longer can the U.S. economy continue to produce enough wealth to sustain a growing class of people who depend on government for some or all of their daily necessities? “
I thought he was talking about Wall St. and defense companies no-bid contractors.
Defense spending grew from 74 percent during the Bush admin.
And how much was that TRAP, er TARP package again?
Defense spending grew from 74 percent during the Bush admin.
And non-defense consumption spending grew 79%.
“And non-defense consumption spending grew 79%.”
By who? The gov? Consumers? GDP? Ya lost me here.
Sorry - shouldn’t been more clear. I mean by the Federal Government.
2000 Q4: $205.3B
2008 Q4: $368.5B
79.5% increase
Not trying to justify the military increase - just saying that Bush is generally viewed only from that standpoint when he increased spending, when in reality he did it across the board.
Ah. Thanks. Got ya.
So, what happens if/when a state goes into default?
Muni Madness: The Next American Meltdown?
NYT~April 5, 2010
Just days after Treasury released a glowing report on the effects of Build America bonds, local governments like cities, counties and school districts are looking shakier, Rick Bookstaber says on his blog.
Mr. Bookstaber, a former risk manager at Morgan Stanley and Salomon Brothers, compares the market for municipal debt with pre-crisis mortgages, and sees some disturbing similarities.
Municipalities, for example, don’t have to adhere to the same disclosure rules as corporations, which means their balance sheet is more opaque, their financial situation less well understood.
A lot of them have seen their tax base hit with the collapse in real estate prices, which could have a cascading effect on the fiscal food chain.
Mr. Bookstaber seems to think a psychological barrier prevents many local governments from going into default, for the moment — but once a few have suffered that humiliation, others will be less hesitant.
If you think their debt is backed up by solid tax revenues, think again:[J]ust as homeowners took their income and locked it up via secondary loans, much of the tax base for municipalities is already mortgaged, through the sale of tax-related revenues streams like tolls and parking fees. Indeed, although general obligation bonds are considered the cream of the crop, they might just as well be regarded as the residual claim after anything with solid fee streams has been sold off.A case study for the financial difficulties those governments now face is Jefferson County, Alabama, which had to put about 1,000 public employees on furlough last year because it was $5 billion in debt. $5 billion. That’s over $7,500 for every man, woman and child, in a county with about 662,000 people and almost 11 percent unemployment.
How the nation’s biggest banks are ripping off American cities with the same predatory deals that brought down Greece :
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/32906678/looting_main_street/1
Follow up to a posting on Sat. My niece and her new husband want to buy a B&B in a tourist area in Eastern Ontario,(Prince Edward County) nice place, we go there ourselves in the summer. House costs $425000. She thought that the house could be purchased with 5% down over 35 years. Seems Canada Mortgage & Housing Corp. C.M.H.C.. like Fanny Mae would insure at this rate for a house. Because it’s a B&B, C.M.H.C. will not insure the mortgage and now they need 20% down, which they don’t have.They have asked my wife and me for $63000 to help them buy the property.We can afford this. The deal would be formalized with proper payment schedules and a modest interest rate over 5-6 years. Any thoughts. P.S. I think the comments will be interesting.
experience is the best teacher.. next time they will get the loan before spilling the b+b beans..
Shortly thereafter they will go busted and that experience will teach them even more good stuff..
oh yeah.. almost forgot. If you would never in a million years “gift” them the money, don’t consider lending it to them.
Bingo!
Never do business with friends or family.
I have loaned my mom a large amount of money which she took much longer to pay back than was promised. I felt that she was not allocating her resources appropriately and had an unrealistic opinion how how much she should get on the sale of her house. It was a horrible experience because I could never discuss the subject openly with her without having the conversation end very badly. If you think that saying NO now is difficult, just imagine how bad it will be when you have to threaten a lawsuit if things don’t go as planned. Stay away. I would tell them you do not think it is appropriate for you because it is a large amount of money and you would feel conflicted if you had to enforce collection. If they are reasonable they should understand.
Never lend what you are not willing to give away permanently.
Speaking of.. where has az_lender been lately?
We can afford this.
But apparently they can’t.
I think you should reject their request, then lowball the place for $300000 putting in the $60k that you say you can afford as down payment. Once you gain 100% ownership yourself, hire your niece and new husband to manage the place. Let them keep 100% of the profits they make running it. It’ll be a great start for them with no risk, while you see all the benefits of future capital appreciation.
I thank you all for your usual good advice. My wife and I have no intention of contributing to the DELINQUENCY of minors. We will, however, offer $30000, in the full realization that they probably have hit the wall and will not be able to raise the rest. If they do, then we will mentally write it off. Family peace sometimes comes at a steep price. P.S. No inheritance for you.
I wouldn’t give them cash.. I’d apply the $30K to the purchase.
I don’t know exactly how, but the money belongs in escrow, to be returned to you if the deal falls through. Additionally, I would stipulate that, if they sell or get a loan on the property or whatever, you get your money back.
There should be no way possible they can pocket your gift while detaching themselves from the property.
No need to be overt about your real reason.. lack of trust perhaps?.. Just say “Our lawyer (or tax atty or estate/trust atty) insists we do it this way”.
Being in a position of power, this may be a great opportunity to teach them a thing or two.. I dunno what things they might need to know, but their minds and hearts will be wide open to suggestion. I’d put some thought into it.. get my money’s worth.
Thank you for your advice. The rules in Canada don’t really match your ideas, but from my latest conversations the parents are not willing to pony up, so I’m off the hook as far as I am concerned.
not really advice.. just letting my mind wander. $30K can be a powerful incentive to do things one is not normally inclined to do.
Breaking Down is Hard to Do,
- or-
Long Yield, Short Bonds in 2010
Now, shorting the bonds may be hazardous to your financial health, but the charts are signalling lower prices (higher yields) ahead:
http://tinyurl.com/y8z6wtp
Disclaimer - This is my opinion only. You may wish to consult Tim Geithner for an opposing viewpoint.
I know nothing about Chartism (head and shoulders is a shampoo as far as I’m concerned).. but volume there seems to be on the low side.
Breaking and entering, must not be a crime in S.F.
Housing protest leads to takeover of duplex.
SAN FRANCISCO — A group of homeless people and housing activists took over a privately owned Mission District duplex on Sunday in what served as the climax of a protest designed to promote use of San Francisco’s vacant buildings as shelters for the needy.
But the owner of the property - who was targeted over his eviction of a tenant - said the demonstration was nothing more than breaking and entering.
“It’s not actually vacant. I use it for my own personal uses,” Ara Tehlirian of Daly City said in an interview, adding that he was in contact with the San Francisco Police Department. “I know nothing other than my property was apparently broken into.”
The takeover epitomized the tensions between property owners and tenant activists that have flared for decades in the city, and sometimes tip into outright hostilities near the peaks and troughs of the market cycle.
This time, more than fifty people marched in the rain through the Mission District, hoisting picket signs that read “House keys not handcuffs” and chanting “Whose city? Our city.” The action was organized by Homes Not Jails, a 20-year-old group affiliated with the San Francisco Tenants Union.
Homes Not Jails
Interesting chant. It reminds me of a video I found on youtube. Sometimes a foreigner’s perception can make one question one’s countries practices. This is a youtube of a British game show discussing the American Prison Nation and slave labor. Some of the facial expressions after hearing facts are quite interesting. 36% of American-made home appliances made by prison labor?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwT6CisM0mU
Or google: youtube quite interesting american jail
“No society in history has imprisoned more of its citizens than the USA.”
USA! We’re Number One! USA! We’re Number One!
By definition, we are a police state.
Back on topic, those protesters are idiots. Trespassing, B&E, public nuisance, disturbing the peace.
National debt seen heading for crisis level. SF Gate
(04-05) Washington — Health care may have been the last big bang of the Obama presidency.
With ferocious speed, the financial crisis, recession and efforts to combat the recession have swung the U.S. debt from worrisome to ruinous, promising to handcuff the administration.
Lost amid last month’s passage of the new health care law, the Congressional Budget Office issued a report showing that within this decade, President Obama’s own budget sends the U.S. government to a potential tipping point where the debt reaches 90 percent of gross domestic product.
Economists Carmen Reinhart of the University of Maryland and Kenneth Rogoff of Harvard University have recently shown that a 90 percent debt-to-GDP ratio usually touches off a crisis.
This year, the debt will reach 63 percent of GDP, a ratio that has ignited crises in smaller wealthy nations. Fiscal crises gripped Canada, Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Ireland when their debts were below where the United States is shortly headed.
Japan’s debt is much higher, but most of it is held domestically, and Japan’s economy has been weak for 20 years. “I really don’t think we want to be like Japan,” said UC Berkeley economist Alan Auerbach.
One advantage the United States has - and it is a big one - is that it issues the world’s reserve currency and so can print dollars to service its debt.
The Obama budget will add $10 trillion to the national debt in the next decade and will not stabilize the deficit, the CBO found. Deficits are expected to dip as the recovery takes hold, but never below $724 billion a year. Interest costs alone will consume $5.6 trillion this decade. A balanced budget has been widely ruled out as unattainable.
This year, the debt will reach 63 percent of GDP
Sigh.
Sorry guys, that’d be 95% of GDP. If you’re going to use the “Debt held by the public” figure, you should qualify it as such.
Gold, silver, oil, DOW, up. Dollar down.
Note: Trim Tabs research says insider selling hit 6.9 billion last month. They bought just 830 million worth of equity. Surly these CEOs are missing the boat as the market marches onward and upward.
Another skeptical view on the Miracle on Wall Street:
Why is it that on another “Amazin’ Obama Monday” that out of nowhere, with oil prices spiking, earthquakes rocking the world and uncertainty on every front, that by another Obama miracle, Wall Street is rising to the 11,000 level?
As in “Obama Jobs”, this is all manufactured data made to give the appearance that there is endive on every plate and cherry pie in every pot.
This is massive fraud by Barack Obama, and it has all the earmarks of Tim Geithner once again, dumping electronic money, not traceable back into Obama, into crony stocks to reward them, and to give the illusion that the American economy is repaired and prospering.
This is what is termed “monetizing” and it usually is assaulted only on currencies by their own out of control governments. It is an absolute draconian disaster as America is impaled in the Black Investment Forest of Tim Geithner.
These are high crimes. It is pure treacherousness and it is going unchecked in that no one is bothering to expose this Obama piracy.
Obama is not fixing one thing. He is electronically creating counterfeit funds, buying up stocks in kickbacks to international corporations and leaving Americans with massive debt.
That is the reality. It is a Crooks Incorporated from Obama, the robber barons, the internationalists and the press.
Feds: Gut Chinese drywall homes
South Florida Business Journal -
Two federal agencies said Friday that homes with contaminated Chinese drywall must be gutted of all drywall, wiring and plumbing to be considered safe.
The decision follows a federal judge’s ruling in Louisiana that had already thrown out a proposal by drywall manufacturers for a cheaper, less disruptive plan. Other proposals have included coating or spraying the high-sulfur drywall, or simply installing filters in an air-conditioning system.
“Based on the scientific work to date, removing the problem drywall is the best solution currently available to homeowners,” CPSC Chairman Inez Tenenbaum said in a news release. She said the decision provides a foundation for Congressional hearings on relief for affected homeowners.
The new guidance on a fix for Chinese drywall was issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. The drywall was imported during the building boom when domestic supplies grew slim. Millions of tons were installed in thousands of homes, mostly in Florida. Sulfur gas from the drywall corrodes metal and causes acrid odors.
“This guidance, based on the CPSC’s ongoing scientific research, is critical to ensuring that homeowners and contractors have confidence that they are making the appropriate repairs to rid their homes of problem drywall,” said Jon Gant, HUD’s director of healthy homes and lead hazard control.
KABUL – Afghan President Hamid Karzai threatened over the weekend to quit the political process and join the Taliban if he continued to come under outside pressure to reform, several members of parliament said Monday.
Karzai made the unusual statement at a closed-door meeting Saturday with selected lawmakers — just days after kicking up a diplomatic controversy with remarks alleging foreigners were behind fraud in last year’s disputed elections.
Lawmakers dismissed the latest comment as hyperbole, but it will add to the impression the president — who relies on tens of thousands of U.S. and NATO forces to fight the insurgency and prop up his government — is growing increasingly erratic and unable to exert authority without attacking his foreign backers.
Does anyone get the feeling that we are about to pull out of Afghanastan?? Not so much because of Karzi, I wonder if Karzi is acting this way because he knows we are going to be gone soon.
Happy Easter! Sanofi Again Lays Off Staffers Over a Holiday
Apr 5, 2010
Sanofi-Aventis (SNY) continued its tradition of using holidays to deliver layoffs by telling its employees as they returned from the Easter weekend that 400 of them no longer had jobs. The news was delivered in an email to staff this morning from Jerry Durso, vp/U.S. specialized therapeutics.
The company previously laid off a large number of contract pharmaceutical sales reps over Christmas and New Year, who followed 750 of Sanofi’s own employees out the door last Thanksgiving. Sanofi did the same thing in front of the July 4 weekend last year and at Thanksgiving in 2008.
The layoffs are a reaction to declining sales or generic threats on three brands: sleeping pill Ambien CR, osteoporosis drug Actonel and the antidepressant Aplenzi. None of the moves were a surprise, at least to Sanofi’s staff.
Energy Department Will Make Revisions to Its Monthly Report on Output
WSJ 4-5-10
The Energy Department is preparing to make sweeping revisions to its U.S. natural-gas production data after finding it has been overstating output, raising new questions about the government’s collection of energy information.
The monthly gas-production data, known as the 914 report, is used by the industry and analysts as a guide for everything from making capital investments to predicting future natural-gas prices and stock recommendations.
But the Energy Information Administration, the statistical unit of the Energy Department, has uncovered a fundamental problem in the way it collects the data from producers across the country — it surveys only large producers and extrapolates its findings across the industry. That means it doesn’t reflect swings in production from hundreds of smaller producers.
The EIA plans to change its methodology this month, resulting in “significant” downward revisions in some areas, according to Gary Long, the acting director of the 914 form, who led the review.
The Wall Street Journal last month reported that the EIA also has key deficiencies in its collection of market-moving oil-inventory data that has caused swings in its survey.
The EIA has been overtaken by advances in technology, oil-shale finds and changes in the industry and has been less able to account for smaller companies that increase or decrease production. Some commodities analysts and gas producers, such as EOG Resources Inc., have long suspected that the EIA has overstated domestic natural-gas output — a factor they argue has helped push prices to seven-year lows in 2009.
This has been a problem for over 10 years. API numbers don’t match DOE. I would also note that West Texas Sweet Crude number is no longer used for world wide price quotes. They use a blended price from several large OPEC producers.
Did you also know that gas shale field depletion is running much higher than the models predicted. Louisiana also has a problem with their natural gas deposits are very high temperature and this reduces yields too.
Good call BlueStar.
Bankruptcy up from February to March
Creditloan.com
An organization that tracks bankruptcies announced recently that March saw its fair share of filings.
According to Automated Access to Court Electronic Records, more than 158,000 bankruptcy filings were seen in federal courts in March. The number of filings represents a 35 percent increase over the statistics reported for February.
March also marks the highest number of filings seen new bankruptcy rules came in effect. In October 2005, the government put forward the new rules, which made it more difficult for people to qualify for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection.
Rather, consumers may have to file for Chapter 13, wherein a five-year payment plan is established. In order to determine who can file for what, a test is conducted to see if consumers would have at least $100 left every month after paying certain expenses. If they do, then they must file for Chapter 13.
The increase continues an alarming trend in bankruptcy that is seeing more individuals and corporations filing. According to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, 2009 saw a 31.9 percent increase in the number of bankruptcy filings made in federal courts.
$100 left over? Say what?! $100 is pocket money these days. And that’s no exaggeration.
Let’s see, that’s a tank of gas and one week’s worth of groceries for one person.
Unwanted car leases linked to mortgage, divorce
South Florida Business Journal
Growing financial pressures of underwater mortgages and life changes from divorce are the two biggest reasons many escape from an unwanted car lease contract, according to data from LeaseTrader.com.
An online marketplace for car lease transfers, LeaseTrader on Monday revealed information it accumulated during the fourth quarter of 2009, when it analyzed reasons why a growing number of South Florida drivers use the marketplace to escape a car lease they could no longer afford.
LeaseTrader says South Florida drivers use its services to find credit-qualified individuals anywhere in the country to take over their remaining contract.
South Florida remains the third-most-popular region in the nation for LeaseTrader.com, as an increasing number of drivers look to escape or downsize out of a car lease without incurring expensive early lease termination fees.
“A car is typically the second-largest monthly bill for a household, so LeaseTrader.com is an easy way to get rid of an unwanted car payment for people dealing with a variety of financial and personal issues,” founder and CEO Sergio Stiberman said in a news release.
The reasons varying percentages of South Floridians gave for escaping a vehicle on LeaseTrader.com are:
* Underwater mortgage: 16.6 percent
* Divorce: 15.8 percent
* Leaving the area: 11.2 percent
* Job loss: 9.1 percent
* Buyer’s remorse: 7.4 percent
LeaseTrader says there is currently a growing waiting list of people looking to take over a car lease from a distressed driver.
Sexual predators on the loose, earthquakes, neighbors shooting neighbors… I guess there has never been a better time to buy a home in Poway?
Westside
L.A. NOW
Southern California — this just in
Three dead in Poway
April 4, 2010 | 11:44 pm
I just heard Larry Yun state on the KNX business hour that the drop in sales contracts out west was, “due to low inventory”.
Darn those banks holding shadow inventory off the market! We could have had a banner sales month.
AP Source: Report on Social Security delayed
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is delaying release of the annual report on the financial health of Social Security and Medicare so that the new report can reflect the impact of the recently passed health care overhaul.
An administration official told The Associated Press that this year’s trustees report will be delayed until June 30, three months later than it usually comes out.
The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity before the formal announcement, said that the delay will allow the government to determine the impact of the massive overhaul of health care that President Barack Obama just signed into law.
In January, Richard Fisher, the chief actuary for Medicare, estimated that the Senate bill which passed on Christmas eve would extend the life of the Medicare hospital trust fund by 10 years. The legislation that finally passed Congress was the Senate bill but with revisions approved to win House support.
The administration official said that passage last month of the health care overhaul legislation had made the trustees report, which usually comes out around April 1, obsolete. This official said the decision was made to incorporate all of the changes made by the legislation to better reflect reality now that Congress has passed health care overhaul.
Sounds appropriate.
Didn’t last year’s come out in May? There was a spate of articles then about the worsening status of the SS/Medicare funds - seems like that would have been triggered by this report.
E.g. this one, referring to a report that came out last May 12.
Sounds like you L.A. folks need to be more generous with your ‘donations’ to the city…
Los Angeles Controller Says City to Run Out of Cash in a Month
April 5 (Bloomberg) — Los Angeles will run out of cash on May 5, city Controller Wendy Greuel said today in a release in which she requested a $90 million transfer of reserve funds to pay bills.
Where is Warren Buffet when you need him?
Toyota Should Be Fined $16.4 Million, LaHood Says (Update1)
April 5 (Bloomberg) — Toyota Motor Corp. “knowingly hid a dangerous defect” that caused sudden acceleration and should be fined the maximum civil penalty of $16.4 million, U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said.
Toyota, the world’s largest automaker, waited at least four months before it told the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration about vehicle accelerator pedals that may stick, LaHood said today in an e-mailed statement.
“We now have proof that Toyota failed to live up to its legal obligations,” LaHood said in the statement. “Worse yet, they knowingly hid a dangerous defect for months from U.S. officials and did not take action to protect millions of drivers and their families.”
The proposed fine is the largest civil penalty assessed by the auto safety regulator against a carmaker. Toyota, based in Toyota City, Japan, in January recalled about 2.3 million cars and trucks for sticky accelerator pedals. The company has recalled more than 8 million vehicles worldwide for flaws that may cause unintended acceleration.
Obama seeks market-based yuan
WASHINGTON/BEIJING (Reuters) - The United States on Monday reiterated its call for China’s currency to be market-based, as lawmakers warned they would act if there was no movement from China on revaluing the yuan.
Beggars can’t be choosers.
Blame China. That seems to be the new MO of this admin.
Talk about Hippocrates. The leaders of this country have been systematically devaluing the dollars for ages and they suddenly think Yuan is the problem.
Arpaio gets inmates moving on electricity-generating cycles.
PHOENIX — Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio is implementing a new inmate program at Tent City Jail called “Pedal Vision.”
The program uses inmate-powered cycles to generate electricity for televisions.
Reports say Arpaio’s recent visit to Tent City inspired the idea, when he saw that many of the inmates were overweight.
The stationary bikes are customized so that as an inmate pedals, a connected television is powered once the cycle generates 12 volts of electricity.
One hour of pedaling equals one hour of television viewing for the inmates, according to Arpaio.
Arpaio said the inmates will only be able to watch television in the television room if they choose to pedal.
“I started with the females because they seemed more receptive to the idea,” Arpaio said. “The only exercise the females get right now is speed-walking around the tents yard and few are doing that. This gives them a reason to get moving and a way to burn up to 500 calories an hour. They won’t be charged a monthly gym fee but they will have to sign a contract.”
Sheriff Arpaio debuted the pilot program on April 1.
Santelli: $4 Gas, $150 Oil Coming This Summer
04/05/2010
With summer driving season upon us, it’s important to note that there’s a traditional jump in gas prices. But will this seasonal adjustment benefit commodities, specifically oil and make the price of gasoline even higher? That could happen if those forms of energy lure investment from what seems to be an over-valued equities market, brought on by what some claim is cheap money.
On her April 5 program, “Closing Bell” host Maria Bartiromo asked CNBC’s CME Group floor reporter Rick Santelli if a move higher in commodities was due to inflation. However, according to Santelli, it’s not inflation but a move by investors out of a potentially over-valued equities market that will cause a rise in commodities.
“Well, you know, I don’t like to link the two together,” Santelli said. “I mean, many times you know, it is core [minus] food and energy. So I think throw all that away. I think the better question is, is that when people are afraid to put their money to work in treasuries, because rates may be going higher, maybe afraid that we are a little long in the tooth in the sugar-buzz rally of equities - boy, commodities is the place to be. Most of the good dollar trades probably already out there.”
I think he is right.
It’s 2008 all over. High oil prices in Summer and Financial collapse in Fall.
From bucolic bliss to ‘gated ghetto’
Hemet’s Willowalk tract was family-friendly. Then the recession hit.
Reporting from Hemet - The gated community in Hemet doesn’t seem like the best place for Eddie and Maria Lopez to raise their family anymore.
Vandals knocked out the streetlight in front of the Lopezes’ five-bedroom home and then took advantage of the darkness to try to steal a van. Cars are parked four deep in the driveway next door, where a handful of men rent rooms. And up and down their block of handsome single-family homes are padlocked doors, orange “no trespassing signs” and broken front windows.
It wasn’t what the Lopezes pictured when they agreed to pay $440,000 for their 5,000-square-foot house in 2006.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hemet30-2010mar30,0,4976165,full.story
Anyone want a free BMW? Feel free to claim it (from the e-mail I just received):
You won BMW X6 XDrive Car and a £750,000.00GBP.
contact E-mail:redeem_gregsmith06@hotmail.co.uk
This message and any attachments are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from printing,
copying, forwarding, saving, or otherwise using or relying upon them in
any manner. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received
this message by mistake and delete it from your system.
I’ll swap you my Nigerian letter for this e-mail if you’ll toss in a tank of gas.
Gov’t aims to help more “underwater” homeowners
Gov’t expands assistance for homeowners with property values under their mortgages April 5, 2010
WASHINGTON (AP) — The government launched a new effort on Monday to speed up the time-consuming, often-frustrating process of selling your home if you owe more than it’s worth.
The Obama administration will give $3,000 for moving expenses to homeowners who complete such a sale — known as a short sale — or agree to turn over the deed of the property to the lender. It’s designed for homeowners who are in financial trouble but don’t qualify for the administration’s $75 billion mortgage modification program.
Owners will still lose their homes, but a short sale or deed in lieu of foreclosure doesn’t hurt a borrower’s credit score for as much time as a foreclosure. For lenders, a home usually fetches more money in a short sale than a foreclosure. And the bank avoids expensive legal bills, cleanup fees and maintenance costs that follow a foreclosure.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Govt-aims-to-help-more-apf-331717632.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=3&asset=&ccode=
“And the bank avoids expensive legal bills, cleanup fees and maintenance costs that follow foreclosure.”
In other words, you’ll get $3,000 if you don’t trash the house.
Again, it’s all about saving the banks.
I’m getting sick of being held hostage by the destroyers and misfits of
the World that you have to pay them in order to get them not to destroy
property and take their mis-directed anger out on the rest of the Community . I am also getting sick of been held hostage by the Bankers
that flaunt their ill-gotten commission in our face while Main Street is
hurting and Cramer is cheerleading another bubble with that smirk on his face .
Gee, Professor Bear, this one reminds me of your comments yesterday. Seems our government believes there’s something to those pagen rituals. Why else would they arrest someone for putting a hex on J.P. Morgan Chase?
http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/04/05/26131.htm
“MANHATTAN (CN) - The self-ordained Rev. Billy Talen was arrested on Easter Sunday after putting a “holy hex” on JPMorgan Chase bank, which he calls the nation’s largest financier of coal-mining mountaintop removal. The former New York City mayoral candidate and his green-robed chorus put the hex on two bank branches, saying Morgan Chase has helped destroy more than 450 Appalachian mountains, deforested 800 square miles and polluted more than 1,200 miles of streams.”
LOL. That’s remarkably perceptive of him actually, realizing that the root of the problem is the WS megabanks and not the homebuilders.
Too funny!
Good for him!
Dallas/Ft Worth new home starts soar 59% in 1st. quarter.
http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/04/05/2090966/dfw-housing-starts-rose-59-from.html
“”The dramatic percentage increase in starts during the first quarter has more to do with the extremely low level of starts last year than anything else,” said David Brown, director of Metrostudy’s Dallas-Fort Worth offices.”