April 17, 2010

Bits Bucket For April 17, 2010

Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here. Please visit the HBB Forum.




RSS feed | Trackback URI

214 Comments »

Comment by rms
2010-04-17 05:19:04

Nice to see Big V posting again.

Comment by exeter
2010-04-17 08:53:30

+1

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 05:25:54

Look who is holding a pitch fork now…

The Wall Street Journal
U.S. Charges Goldman With Subprime Fraud

Goldman Sachs was charged with deceiving clients by selling them mortgage securities secretly designed by a hedge fund run by John Paulson. Goldman denied the SEC’s civil charges, setting up a major clash between Wall Street and regulators.

The SEC lawsuit likely strengthens the position of President Barack Obama as he tries to push financial-overhaul legislation through Congress. He vowed Friday to veto any version of the bill that doesn’t bring the derivatives market “under control.”

Regulators say Goldman allowed Mr. Paulson’s firm, Paulson & Co., to help design a financial investment known as a CDO, or collateralized debt obligation, built out of a specific set of risky mortgage assets—essentially setting up the CDO for failure. Paulson then bet against it, while investors in the CDO weren’t told of Paulson’s role or intentions.

“The product was new and complex, but the deception and conflicts are old and simple,” said Robert Khuzami, the SEC’s enforcement chief.

Mr. Paulson and his firm aren’t named as defendants. The hedge-fund firm said in a statement that it wasn’t involved in marketing the bonds to third parties. “Goldman made the representations, Paulson did not,” Mr. Khuzami said.

Mr. Paulson took home $4 billion in 2007 for correctly betting on a housing collapse.

The SEC said Mr. Tourre was “principally responsible” for piecing together the bonds and touting them to investors. According to the SEC, Mr. Tourre wrote in an email shortly before the bonds were sold that “the whole building is about to collapse anytime now.” He described himself in the email as the “Only potential survivor, the fabulous Fab … standing in the middle of all these complex, highly leveraged, exotic trades he created without necessarily understanding all of the implications of those monstruosities!!!”

But he was hardly alone, the SEC alleges: The deals were signed off by senior Goldman executives, though the SEC didn’t specify how high up it believes the knowledge extended.

In the past year, Goldman—the most profitable firm on Wall Street—has emerged as a symbol of excess. The taxpayer-funded rescue of the markets helped catapult Goldman to a huge profit rebound last year and stirred resentment of the firm’s bonuses. Goldman paid out about $16 billion in compensation to employees in 2009.

And late last year in a profile in London’s Sunday Times, Goldman’s chief executive, Lloyd Blankfein, described himself as “doing God’s work,” a remark that Goldman later explained was made in jest. Still, the quip inflamed Goldman critics who said it showed the firm was tone deaf about concerns over its business practices and rich pay.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 05:35:42

Do you think God’s little helper will play the “know-nothin’ CEO” defense? How’d that work out for Bernie Ebbers at World Com?

This is a whole new ball game, folks. Thank you, Mr. President.

UPDATE 6-Goldman Sachs charged with fraud by SEC
Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:36pm EDT

MORE LAWSUITS TO COME?

It is unlikely that criminal charges will be brought, a person close to the matter said. Representatives for the Justice Department declined to comment.

Yet the lawsuit is widely expected to spur other lawsuits, and is “probably the first of several,” according to Doug Kass, president of hedge fund Seabreeze Partners Management.

Regulators and plaintiffs’ lawyers are going to be looking at other deals, to what kind of conflicts Goldman has,” said Jacob Zamansky, a lawyer who represents investors in securities fraud lawsuits.

I’ve been contacted by Goldman customers to bring lawsuits to recover their losses,” he added. “With the SEC bringing fraud charges it’s going to expose what’s behind the curtain.”

WASHINGTON IMPACT

The charges are expected to fuel anti-Wall Street sentiment on Capitol Hill where sweeping financial industry reforms are expected to soon arrive on the Senate floor for a vote.

A Democratic bill, strongly supported by President Barack Obama, would slap new restraints on major banks, likely curtailing their opportunities for profit and revenue growth.

Similar legislation was approved in the House of Representatives in December. Analysts believe a bill could be signed into law by Obama by mid-year.

“Banks were getting their mojo back, successfully fighting the regulatory reform bill,” said James Ellman, president of Seacliff Capital in San Francisco. “Clearly, such malfeasance could help get the bill to go through.”

Goldman in 2008 won a $5 billion investment from Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

Last month, Buffett praised Goldman as a “very, very strong, well-run business,” and said of Blankfein, “You cannot find a better manager.”

Buffett had no immediate comment, his assistant Carrie Kizer said.

The SEC lawsuit was assigned to U.S. District Judge Barbara Jones, who was appointed to the bench in 1995 by President Bill Clinton. She presided over the 2005 criminal trial of former WorldCom Inc Chief Executive Bernard Ebbers over an $11 billion accounting fraud at the phone company.

Comment by SUGuy
2010-04-17 09:02:45

Consulting my made in china magic eight ball…

I predict that Goldman will move very swiftly to settle this mess and move on. After that Goldman will donate some money to charity.

LOVE the timing of the Goldman Sachs crackdown…just as Congress begins to seriously debate financial reform, the Obama Administration is learning that a certain theatrical flair can only help theirlegislative prospects.

The Obama administration to date has acted as an agent of Goldman I doubt very much that this is likely to change. Likewise, the Senate is famously corrupt and dominated by financial interests. The financial “reform” will be a lot like the health insurance “reform”, ie, a corporate wish list passed into law and hyped in front of the public as something its not.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 09:40:11

Isn’t the Treasury Secretary a Gollum alum?

The first step to cleaning up corruption in the financial system would be to stop the flow of Megabank, Inc alumni into high level federal government posts.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by SUGuy
2010-04-17 10:17:33

So the next scandal is going to be who had advance knowledge of SEC charges, and who shorted Goldman Sachs for profit this week.

Goldman Sachs Said to Have Been Warned of SEC Suit

April 17 (Bloomberg) — Goldman Sachs Group Inc., which fell 13 percent yesterday after U.S. regulators announced fraud accusations, didn’t disclose that it was warned nine months ago that investigators wanted to bring a case, people with direct knowledge of the talks said.

Goldman Sachs responded to the so-called Wells notice from the Securities and Exchange Commission within months and met with the agency officials trying to fend off the civil lawsuit, said the people, who declined to be identified because the talks weren’t public. In March, the New York-based firm said it was cooperating with regulators’ “requests for information.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a52BBUru4.hM

 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 05:50:36

‘…described himself as “doing God’s work,” a remark that Goldman later explained was made in jest.’

In retrospect, that is just hilarious.

Comment by denquiry
2010-04-17 05:59:39

Even god had to pay Caesar.

Comment by James
2010-04-17 08:37:31

It would have been great to catch Jesus in a rant about marginal tax rates on his furniture business.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 14:05:05

I recall he kvetched quite a bit about the money lenders who desecrated God’s temple.

 
Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-04-18 09:33:33

It is interesting to note that the one and only time Christ lost His temper was with the moneylenders in the Temple - the scum of the day who were doing “God’s work.” Even when put to death, He forgave his killers for they knew not what they did; not so for the moneylenders…

 
 
 
 
Comment by denquiry
2010-04-17 05:58:34

what I don’t understand is……if GS has done forked everybody (banker) and his brother then how in the h*ll do they stay in business? if it’s common knowledge that they are crooks and will bet against you on the inside knowledge they have obtained from you…their customer.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 06:04:18

“…how in the h*ll do they stay in business?”

So far, so good; it’s still too early to tell whether they will soon join the list of Wall Street’s dearly departed (Enron, World Com, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, etc).

Comment by Bill in Carolina
2010-04-17 06:17:15

When a company, state, or country invites GS over to do business, or responds to a GS invitation, they should now be fully aware of who’s the sucker at the table.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by elvismcduf
2010-04-17 07:23:16

100 million $ fine then business a usual.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by AZtoORtoCOtoOR
2010-04-17 08:21:57

Totally agree. A few fines here and there is just the cost of doing business. The settlement was probably agreed to before this even came out.

 
Comment by Natalie
2010-04-17 08:47:07

I have tried to explain this before. Obama is timing this to get political support for financial reform (which GS supports in many ways) and to shift anger away from the party to the Banks for the time being. They probably already have a negotiated settlement lined up, and agreed not to name individuals or allege criminal fraud. Last figure I saw thrown around was 1b in damages, lol, even if they settle for 500k, that is chump change for these ppl. Don’t let the government lead you around like dogs. Know the truth. It a dog and pony show to satisfy and control the uniformed mob.

 
Comment by Natalie
2010-04-17 09:01:57
 
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2010-04-17 09:10:42

Hey Natalie, speaking of which, do you fancy a lunch date some time this spring– I am also in the Philly area (screen name is somewhat misleading) and would be interested in meeting you. Maybe we could rope in some others as well.

 
Comment by Natalie
2010-04-17 09:51:26

Im always up for meeting interesting people.

 
Comment by Natalie
2010-04-17 09:52:54

oh and 500k equals 500 mill, i do too many things at once

 
Comment by LehighValleyGuy
2010-04-17 10:37:06

Im always up for meeting interesting people.

I’ll try to live up to that :) Please e-mail me at “lehighvalleyguy_hbb at yahoo dot com” and we can talk further.

 
Comment by basura
2010-04-17 10:46:13

31 yr old, VP Fabulous Fab is “principally behind” the whole thing…..

 
Comment by samk
2010-04-17 11:00:34

“”The whole building is about to collapse anytime now … Only potential survivor, the fabulous Fab … standing in the middle of all these complex, highly leveraged, exotic trades he created without necessarily understanding all of the implications of those monstrosities!!!”" - Fab Fabrice

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 12:15:13

Yes Natalie, we know it’s a dog and pony show, but even in the smoke and mirror world of politics, this is still pretty gutsy.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-04-17 12:37:20

Back when the admin was (apparently) doing nothing against Goldman, that was proof they were owned by them. Now that the admin is going after Goldman, somehow that proves they are owned by them.

Anyone else sense a catch-22?

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 15:14:58

:lol: Right?

 
Comment by Natalie
2010-04-17 15:28:02

“Back when the admin was (apparently) doing nothing against Goldman, that was proof they were owned by them. Now that the admin is going after Goldman, somehow that proves they are owned by them.” Its not the analysis that changed, but the facts. The admin. ignored it until they realized the voters were demanding action. A comprise needed to be reached to keep those in power in power. Nothing more. Nothing less.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 16:01:05

The White House does not have unlimited resource to pursue and correct so many problems at once.

That was the ultimate goal of the Repubs, to leave behind such a mess that he would be a one term Pres.

 
 
 
Comment by palmetto
2010-04-17 06:30:08

“if GS has done forked everybody (banker) and his brother then how in the h*ll do they stay in business?”

Some people don’t get fokked. Or at least don’t get fokked for a while. Like John Paulson. People see that and hope, like those who did business with Madoff, that they are among the chosen to be let in on Goldman’s schemes.

Also read Matt Taibbi’s article in Rolling Stone. That’s how they stay in business.

 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2010-04-17 07:01:17

It was not widely known. Hence, the lawsuit.

I hope people stop doing business with them as a result and they are barred from government and the franchise goes to zero. We’ll all be better off without a vampire squid sucking our faces.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 07:17:04

“We’ll all be better off without a vampire squid sucking our faces.”

Righto — F-’em.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Bad Chile
2010-04-17 14:42:39

While I agree with this on the surface, I suspect that if Goldman goes down some other firm will just rise in its place with the same case of characters.

 
Comment by CA renter
2010-04-18 02:18:18

Exactly. These same people just pop up in different (but similar) places.

 
Comment by DebtinNation
2010-04-18 18:47:50

It’s like the Medellin Cartel back in the ’80s. After the notoriously evil Pablo Escobar was finally hunted down and terminated, other “businessmen”, albeit less conspicuous and at least less dangerous to the general public, took his place.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Kim
2010-04-17 06:05:00

“Goldman’s chief executive, Lloyd Blankfein, described himself as “doing God’s work,” a remark that Goldman later explained was made in jest. Still, the quip inflamed Goldman critics who said it showed the firm was tone deaf about concerns over its business practices and rich pay.”

It was mentioned on last night’s “Fast Money” that Goldman Sachs must feel they have a decent enough defense because they could have negotiated a settlement in advance, but they didn’t. Just more evidence that GS has egotism in spades. Still, if the banksters can keep the rest of the cockroaches hidden and if they can drag this out long enough (two big IFs), GS just might get away with it. Its going to be interesting.

Comment by mikeinbend
2010-04-17 08:23:08

Got Stucco, Goldman Sachs, Green Shoots, perchance I am dreaming, but maybe PB, who claimed to be bored on the blog last week, created Green Shoots so as to argue with himself???

PB inquiring mind wants to know. More juicy info today, Green Shoots might be quiet as for the Goodly Stimulating info regarding GS of late. I like the playing the devil’s advocate, do you too. I had an imaginary friend when I was four, his name was Grant Samaritan!

Green Shoots, come out of the abundant grass and expose yourself. Well maybe that would be TMI…..

Comment by pressboardbox
2010-04-17 08:46:11

I had him busted as green shoots the first post he made: A “test” the day after the big spat with muggy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by scdave
2010-04-17 09:10:18

Hmmm…I missed that…

Green Shoots = Pbear ??

 
Comment by Natalie
2010-04-17 10:12:29

I thought I was all posters that question conventional HBB wisdom, supposedly getting paid by 3 political parties, Wall Street, 8 minority groups, 6 fortune 500 companies, 9 religious organizations and a few eccentric billionaires to post on here at an annual salary in excess of $500k. Is someone trying to gain market share?

 
 
 
 
Comment by cobaltblue
2010-04-17 08:29:18

My take on the whole Goldman thing:

What you see in the news has been carefully orchestrated. This is pre-midterm elections kabuki theater of the politically absurd.

The guilty parties and their escape from punishment have already been scripted.

Think professional wrestling, and everybody cheers when Mr. Wonderful comes strutting in to smackdown Mr. Evil. “It’s about time!” the crowd screams.

So, why is this hapening now? Timing is everything in political drama. The Fed and Treasury need willing buyers of the T-Bonds and T-Bills. They also need to keep interest rates low until after mid-term elections, or the wheels REALLY come off. How to engineer the best result? Why, crash the absurdly high equity market, which Goldman is already short. Blame the downturn, as they already are, on the “charges” against Goldman. The people accept lower interest rates on the Bonds and Bills as the market is perceived now as a bad bet. Goldman makes a trillion on their shorts and puts on the market. The Obots claim the Democrats are cleaning up Wall Street and the public buys it. Successful mid-term kabuki theater for the comprehenion challenged has just been engineered and produced. Free tickets from the MSM.

Comment by pressboardbox
2010-04-17 08:37:53

But professional wrestling is real. Its real, right?

 
Comment by BlueStar
2010-04-17 08:59:03

I am listening to a audio book right now about the media written in 2008 by Nick Davies called Flat Earth News. Really shows how the news industry has shaped our world and redefined the role of news reporting. Highly recommended.

http://www.flatearthnews.net/
http://www.amazon.com/Flat-Earth-News-Award-Winning-Distortion/dp/0099512688

Comment by scdave
2010-04-17 09:41:41

Just ordered it…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by CA renter
2010-04-18 02:43:38

Great site, too.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Kirisdad
2010-04-17 09:42:00

Mostly agree blue, except that they don’t want to crash the equity markets, just open the valve a little to let the bubbles out. In this game, we’re all being bled a little at a time.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-04-17 13:15:38

Brilliant analysis, Cobalt.

As much as I’d like to believe the SEC is awakening from its coma and showing the first signs of looking out for the public interest, “kabuki theater” appears to be the best description of this stage-managed “investigation.”

 
Comment by CA renter
2010-04-18 02:20:33

Excellent post, cobalt. Agree 100%.

 
 
Comment by michael
2010-04-17 10:10:00

i wished the government would have done this before they laundered them money through the AIG bailout.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 12:17:56

Just remember, which president created TARP and which one at least had some pretense of putting some teeth back into the SEC.

 
Comment by measton
2010-04-17 18:29:03

With regard to Paulson

How is this not insider trading?

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 05:49:22

Thanks to bailouts, Megabank of America is well positioned to profit going forward while Main Street America continues to enjoy the bottom of the bus.

Some friends of ours were just foreclosed by Megabank of America on their Countrywide loan. I guess it is all good, as said friends now enjoy life in an affordable (to them) rental, while some lucky family got to purchase their former home at fire sale prices in a short sale.

Still, there is something patently unfair about a bank that would have gone bankrupt if not for the $45 bn in aid from Uncle Sam turning around and evicting hapless American households which were supposed to get HAMP forebearance but didn’t. I personally would rather have seen Megabank of America go under than have my friends kicked out of their family home. Hopefully yesterday’s 5.5 percent loss is a sign that a larger Wall Street fraud investigation is brewing that will catch Megabank of America in its dragnet.

* THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
* BUSINESS
* APRIL 17, 2010

BofA Says the Worst Has Passed
Merrill, Once a Headache, Is Now Driving Profits; Less Upbeat Than Dimon

By DAN FITZPATRICK

Strong investment-banking results powered Bank of America Corp. to a $3.2 billion profit in the first quarter as the giant financial institution reemerged from the most tumultuous year in its history, providing further evidence that U.S. banks are on the mend.

“The worst of the crisis is clearly behind us,” Chief Executive Officer Brian Moynihan said.

But the new CEO struck a less enthusiastic tone about the immediate future than rival J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. CEO James Dimon, who announced a $3.3 billion profit Wednesday and said “this could be the makings of a good recovery.” Mr. Moynihan instead warned that loan demand is weak, the mortgage division continues to struggle, and high unemployment is still “very sticky.” He pledged to protect the bank from any unexpected bumps.

“We are trying to be conservative here,” he said.

The nation’s largest bank by assets lumbered through 2008 and 2009, taking $45 billion in aid from the U.S. government and reeling from the fallout from its decision to buy troubled securities firm Merrill Lynch & Co.

The Merrill Lynch acquisition contributed to the surprise retirement of CEO Kenneth Lewis. His successor, the 50-year-old Mr. Moynihan, is trying to improve the bank’s relationship with customers, change the way it manages risk, and soften the tone it takes in Washington, D.C. Mr. Moynihan also is pushing a new, handpicked management team to better integrate the old Bank of America with its most-recent acquisition, Merrill Lynch.

The performance, though, wasn’t enough to send shares higher Friday, as concerns about the Securities and Exchange Commission’s allegations of fraud at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. weighed down bank stocks.

Bank of America closed at $18.41, down 5.5%.

The bank’s performance in the first quarter shows how the taxpayer infusions that propped up U.S. banks in 2008 and 2009 positioned some of the nation’s largest institutions for a profit rebound this year.

But there is still plenty of uncertainty hanging over the industry. More than 100 banks are expected to fail this year due to bad lending practices and other mistakes in the run-up to the crisis.

Bank of America, for its part, lost $2.1 billion in its still struggling mortgage division. The bank still has $36 billion in nonperforming loans it mightn’t be able to collect. Loan losses were 4.44% of all loans in the first quarter, as compared to 2.85% a year earlier. The bank said its charge-offs would have dropped if the bank hadn’t brought back onto its books loans previously held in off-balance sheet vehicles.

BofA CEO Brian Moynihan said “we are trying to be conservative.”

Revenues dropped 11% to $32.2 billion from $36.1 billion during the year-ago quarter. Fee income was down roughly 22% as the bank grappled with new regulatory restrictions.

“We got work to do,” Mr. Moynihan said.

There also is the danger that the bank’s robust trading income could disappear if interest rates increase, although such a development would likely boost the results of its consumer operations.

Looking ahead, Bank of America is hoping a push overseas in Asia and Europe will generate more revenue, and it is trying to squeeze more referrals between Merrill’s army of financial advisors and Bank of America’s corporate bankers.

Mr. Moynihan also acknowledged the bank is working on changes in the bank’s consumer pricing model, with the possibility of a “maintenance fee” for certain accounts. Such changes are not likely to occur until 2011, but the bank does need to find a way to make up for the billions it will lose as it eliminates debit card overdrafts and other traditional fees.

Even with new regulatory restrictions, Bank of America is still well positioned to churn out big profits in the years ahead. Banking analyst John McDonald said the bank could earn $8.5 billion in 2010, $22.2 billion in 2011 and $27.2 billion in 2012.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 12:20:15

Yep.

1st and 2nd Bank of the United States.

Wikipedia it.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 05:55:53

* THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
* LAW
* APRIL 16, 2010, 11:20 P.M. ET

Judge Bashes Bank in Foreclosure Case

By AMIR EFRATI

A Florida state-court judge, in a rare ruling, said a major national bank perpetrated a “fraud” in a foreclosure lawsuit, raising questions about how banks are attempting to claim homes from borrowers in default.

The ruling, made last month in Pasco County, Fla., comes amid increased scrutiny of foreclosures by the prosecutors and judges in regions hurt by the recession. Judges have said in hearings they are increasingly concerned that banks are attempting to seize properties they don’t own.

The Florida case began in December 2007 when U.S. Bank N.A. sued a homeowner, Ernest E. Harpster, after he defaulted on a $190,000 loan he received in January of that year.

The Law Offices of David J. Stern, which represented the bank, prepared a document called an “assignment of mortgage” showing that the bank received ownership of the mortgage in December 2007. The document was dated December 2007.

But after investigating the matter, Circuit Court Judge Lynn Tepper ruled that the document couldn’t have been prepared until 2008. Thus, she ruled, the bank couldn’t prove it owned the mortgage at the time the suit was filed.

The document filed by the plaintiff, Judge Tepper wrote last month, “did not exist at the time of the filing of this action…was subsequently created and…fraudulently backdated, in a purposeful, intentional effort to mislead.” She dismissed the case.

Forrest McSurdy, a lawyer at the David Stern firm that handled the U.S. Bank case, said the mistake was due to “carelessness.” The mortgage document was initially prepared and signed in 2007 but wasn’t notarized until months later, he said. After discovering similar problems in other foreclosure cases, he said, the firm voluntarily withdrew the suits and later re-filed them using appropriate documents.

Judges get in a whirl about technicalities because the courts are overwhelmed,” he said. “The merits of the cases are the same: people aren’t paying their mortgages.

Cases handled by the Law Offices of David Stern

* Dismissal of GMAC Mortgage LLC v. Debbie Visicaro
* Hearing in U.S. Bank N.A. v. Ernest Harpster

Related Articles

U.S. Probes Foreclosure-Data Provider
4/3/2010

Two Different Plaintiffs Claim to Own Same Mortgage
11/14/2008

Some Judges Stiffen Foreclosure Standards
7/26/2008

The Court House: How One Family Fought Foreclosure
11/28/2007

Judges Tackle “Foreclosure Mills”
11/30/2007

Wells Fargo Is Sanctioned For Role in Mortgage Woes
4/30/2008

Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 12:22:02

“Carelessness.” Yeah, sure.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 05:58:17

* THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
* LAW
* APRIL 16, 2010, 11:46 P.M. ET

Fraud Allegations Further Inflame Fight Over Financial Regulation
BY DAMIAN PALETTA AND VICTORIA MCGRANE

The government’s civil-fraud charges against Goldman Sachs Group Inc. subsumed Washington’s debate over new financial-market rules Friday, handing Democrats a powerful tool to press their case for stricter curbs on Wall Street’s big banks.

Goldman has been a political punching bag since the financial crisis erupted, and lawmakers from both parties promptly sought to draw the SEC charges into the increasingly bitter clash on Capitol Hill over revamping financial markets’ regulatory framework.

“This is also why we need to pass strong Wall Street reform this year,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.).

Comment by palmetto
2010-04-17 06:25:13

“This is also why we need to pass strong Wall Street reform this year,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.).”

I CAN’T STAND IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We HAD Wall Street reform, after the Depression. It was pretty good, too. Worked fairly well for years and was part of what allowed a decent middle class to thrive in this country. That was dismantled by Phil Gramm and his merry band of a-holes from both sides of the aisle. Now they want to waste all sorts of time, money, posturing, lobbying, paperwork, etc to come up with “reform”.

JUST DUST OFF THE OLD LEGISLATION AND RE-INSTITUTE IT, YOU
F*CKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes, I’m yelling. I’m pissed.

Harry Reid needs to retire so he can spend more time with his prostate.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-04-17 08:23:43

Amen, brother.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-04-17 13:25:34

You favor a return to FDR’s regulations, Sammy? Interesting.
(Might get ya kicked out of the Ron Paul fan club, though.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by 2banana
2010-04-17 08:51:09

Didn’t I hear the same logic for getting sarbanes-oxley passed?

We need this law to prevent another Enron and WorldCom?

The same MO.

Huge fininacial fraud
The government regulators asleep raking in campaign contributions
Massive failure
The government says we could not have seen this coming and we need new laws and regualtions (also to take the heat off of them)

Repeat every 5-10 years…

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 09:19:53

Patience, my friend. This is far from over. The central bankers in charge of the Fed and the Treasury Department seem to be banking on the hopes that the economic recovery will prove sufficiently strong
to dampen political pressure to pass substantive financial reform to reign in high-level Wall Street corruption. I am banking on this hope to be dashed to smithereens by the next leg of the crisis, which will stem from the sovereign debt buildup from the Fall 2008 bailouts and other stimulus measures. Hopefully Wall Street will end up severely weakened and discredited, providing the impetus for a systemic overhaul. Too-big-to-fail is leading America down the path to economic ruin.

 
 
Comment by palmetto
2010-04-17 06:44:06

“Goldman has been a political punching bag since the financial crisis erupted,”

Those who the gods would destroy, they first make proud.

 
Comment by arizonadude
2010-04-17 06:59:29

What would we do without goldman screwing everyone?Abby joseph is the biggest crook of them all over there.

 
Comment by palmetto
2010-04-17 07:20:27

Well, I guess my rant isn’t going to show up. Too much capitalization (screaming) and a too-thinly disguised cussword. Anyhoo, the gist was, why not just re-institute all the regulation that served us well for years after the Depression? Take it out, dust it off, put it back in place. Would save a lot of time and money and spikes in blood pressure caused by pronouncements from Barney Fwank, Harry “I’m Senile” Reid and Nancy “Cruella de Vil” Pelosi.

Comment by Captain john
2010-04-17 07:59:43

Fortunately your rant has shown up. I love the anger! You are Spot on BTW, just reinstate the old rules. Trouble is the Banks will fight tooth and nail to resist that and hope that the “new rules” are weaker than those implemented in the depression.

 
Comment by CA renter
2010-04-18 03:00:25

You are absolutely spot-on, Palmy!

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 06:01:29

EMPLOYMENT
California’s jobless rate hits high of 12.6% in March

The state adds 4,200 jobs, but more people were seeking work than in February. L.A. County’s rate holds at 12.4%; Orange County’s rises to 10.1%. Meanwhile, unemployment benefits are running out.

Comment by arizonadude
2010-04-17 07:51:47

Did the state add 4200 more state workers?

 
 
Comment by Bad Chile
2010-04-17 06:04:47

BFF (Bank Failure Friday, or as PB calls it, FDIC Friday) saw a whopping EIGHT banks shut down, bringing the total for the year to 50. We’re still on pace to break the total from last year of 140 by a good margin.

Perhaps the best sign is that a bank in Massachusetts (”home of the second season of Jersey Shore”) failed for the first time since 1994, leading to much gnashing of teeth from the Boston Globe.
=================
In other news, it looks like I’m getting transferred for work - away from Massachusetts, back to my home state (I’ve been in contact with the office there for years, so they clued me in the requisition was being posted). Much much much lower home prices. Rent on a bigger apartment in a really nice area of town is half of what we pay for the apartment here in MA on a busy road, and I keep the same salary. So Mrs. Chile will be able to stay home with Mini-Chile instead of sending him to Kiddie Kennel.

Comment by scdave
2010-04-17 08:20:22

Good for you Chile…You, Mrs. Chile and most of all mini-Chile will look back some day and be very satisfied about your decision…Good luck to you…

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-04-17 08:28:39

Good on ya, Chile. It’s great that your wife will be able to be a stay-at-home mom.

 
Comment by CA renter
2010-04-18 03:02:45

Awesome news, Bad Chile!

Second what scdave and Sammy said. It’s nice to have the option of having a parent stay home to raise the youngsters. :)

 
 
Comment by Ki
2010-04-17 06:08:00

Interesting story I read today on facebook.

My wife has an annual get together with her college friends who are spread out all over the country. About 8-10 of them give go back to the college town for a 3 or 4 day weekend every July. Most of the husbands/boyfriends go as well. I’ve gone 3 times, good times.

One of the participants and her husband - they’ve been married about 6 months - sent out the great news over FB. They had their offer on a house accepted. Woo hoo! It has a pool too!

Only downside, they are now a strict house budget, and have no money to go to the reunion trip in the summer. Just married and due to the r/e propaganda machine, already too broke to go on a trip that will cost them at most $2000. But they’re home owners, and living the American Dream, so that’s a good trade off I suppose.

I was tempted to write back “Congrats. BTW I rent a nicer, bigger house than that, with a bigger pool, for 1/2 what your mortgage will be, and I can go on 10 trips this summer if I want”. But the guest bed is really uncomfortable so I’ll keep my mouth shut.

Comment by scdave
2010-04-17 08:27:57

and living the American Dream, so that’s a good trade off I suppose ??

“nesting” instincts are quite powerful..

 
Comment by 2banana
2010-04-17 08:55:45

$2000 for 3-4 days “getting together?” Holy cow - what are you guys doing if it does not involve VIP rooms and escorts?

I have spent less money for 8 weeks in Europe - and that includes the airfare…

Comment by Kim
2010-04-17 09:51:05

My thoughts, exactly, 2banana. Unless the college is located in the mountains, on the beach or some other equally desirable vacation destination?

 
Comment by Ki
2010-04-17 16:28:22

$500 each for a flight = $1K
$150 a night for a hotel room for 4 nights $600

Food, booze, round or two of golf and there’s $2000.

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 06:08:19

It seems the states that had the biggest real estate bubbles now have (among) the highest unemployment rates. I wonder if there might be a pattern here?

The Associated Press April 16, 2010, 2:23PM ET
Florida’s jobless rate reaches record 12.3 percent

Comment by SouthFL
2010-04-17 06:24:14

My husband is a bankruptcy attorney and many of his clients are individuals who either worked for or owned businesses related to construction or real estate. I think that industry really was the meat and bones of Florida’s employment for many years.

And of course the comment the other day about boob job and boat refi’s (that just cracks me up!)- there are probably a good deal of marinas/boat suppliers and plastic surgeons who aren’t bringing in the big bucks anymore. Which has a trickle down effect.

 
Comment by oxide
2010-04-17 06:28:19

The old tale of Daedalus and Icarus comes to mind.
Straight outta Greece too. I wonder if there might be another pattern…

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 06:11:19

This news will get the housing market going again…

Blogs | Scam Diego
Local Unemployment Rate Back to 11%
By Don Bauder | Posted April 16, 2010, 10:43 a.m.

The unemployment rate in San Diego County rose to 11% in March from 10.7% in February, although employment increased by 5,000 in the month. The comparable rate for California was 13% and the nation 10.2%. Local government jobs went up 1,400 from February to March. Retail trade jobs inched up 0.3% and amusement, gambling and recreation jobs rose 1.3%. Jobs in full service restaurants rose 1.4% in the month. These are possible signs of a lambent consumer recovery. Tourism (accommodation) jobs were flat — an improvement over some previous months. Year over year, the county lost 35,100 jobs.

Comment by scdave
2010-04-17 08:32:47

Losing jobs in late April…Bad sign…

 
Comment by CA renter
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 06:12:55

County, state unemployment rates up
Figures rise even amid increases in hiring

By Dean Calbreath, UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

Friday, April 16, 2010 at 8:40 p.m.

Despite three straight months of hiring increases, the unemployment rate in both California and San Diego County rose to new heights in March because the creation of new jobs has not kept pace with the influx of workers entering the job market.

 
Comment by awaiting wipeout
2010-04-17 06:26:30

Matt Taibbi should get some kind of an award. His investigative journalism on GS has been superb.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 06:46:52

Now that Gollum is on the way down, which of the TBTF megabanks is next?

Great Vampire Squid Goldman Sachs finally gets its collar felt
By Jeremy Warner Business Last updated: April 16th, 2010

If this was the worst banking crisis in history, many have asked, how come hardly anyone has yet been banged up for it? That may be about to change, with news that Goldman Sachs and one of its vice presidents, a 31 year old bond trader who these days works out of the firm’s London office, are to be charged with deception.

For many, this will be a cause for celebration. Goldman Sachs is the doyen of Wall Street, admired, envied, feared, despised and hated in equal measure. Described by Rolling Stone magazine as “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity”, the firm is widely thought of as far too powerful for anyone’s good. What’s more, it has traditionally always managed to escape blame for Wall Street’s many catastrophes. Whenever there is a scandal, Goldman invariably seems to come out smelling of roses.

Not this time, it seems. Goldman Sachs is the first major player to be charged over the giant money making ponzi scheme that the market in mortgage backed securities became. For the Securities & Exchange Commission to take on such a beast indicates not just guts, but also just how far these self styled masters of the universe have fallen since the heady days of the boom.

Once apon a time, Goldman had power over presidents. It regularly supplies US administrations with their Treasury Secretaries and its tentacles seem to stretch everywhere. When the insurance giant AIG looked like pulling Goldman Sachs down with it as the counterparty to tens of billions of dollars in credit derivatives, the Federal government rode to rescue, and in committing tax dollars to supporting AIG enabled AIG to honour its obligations to Goldman Sachs.

Yet here’s the firm now accused of a petty deception. Needless to say, Goldman vigorously dismisses the charges, which it describes as “without foundation”. Few will be crying in sympathy. A growing body of literature on the origins of the credit crunch puts Goldman Sachs firmly at the centre of the extraordinarily profitable business of creating credit derivatives.

Comment by Carl Morris
2010-04-17 07:57:43

Once apon a time, Goldman had power over presidents.

My prediction is that they still do. Hopefully not Kennedy-style.

Comment by Natalie
2010-04-17 08:49:24

Finally people emerge that understand the game. Ty Carl Morris.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Natalie
2010-04-17 08:50:35

Finally something that can see through the smoke emerges.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-04-17 08:32:26

I have tremendous newfound respect for Rolling Stone due to Matt Taibbi’s courageous reporting. The U.S. financial media’s collusion with Wall Street has been just sickening. You pretty much have to read UK or European newspapers online if you want to figure out what’s really going on.

Comment by Natalie
2010-04-17 10:27:45

I do agree Matt and others helped blow the lid off the sewer, but do you ever wonder if the government’s response is the minimum amount that can be done while still making it look like they are really trying to do something about the problem at a time most convenient for them. I do.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-04-17 12:48:20

I thought you were one of our resident Wall Street apologists, Natalie. Why are you suddenly so gung-ho on how corrupt they are? New talking points from HQ?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Natalie
2010-04-17 12:54:38

No, that was ppl that didnt understand said. I only said that criminal conduct is not the only threat we face and that I dont expect Wall Street to act morally. My expectations have nothing to do with my ideology.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-04-17 13:47:17

If we should have no expectations of Wall Street acting morally (an opinion I share), doesn’t that call for regulating them?

As it continues to become apparent that the Repubs will oppose any meaningful regulation of Wall street, will your ideology ever change? Or does reality, just like your expectations, have nothing to do with your ideology?

 
Comment by Natalie
2010-04-17 15:22:39

LOL. I have no doubt I that both sides will work their hardest to carefully balance what is best for Wall Street and Washington, while touting how tough the government was on cracking down on the bankster villians. Smoke and mirrors baby. Sometimes you have to have a fake execution to calm down the masses. It’s not your fault, we are on your side. Problem resolved. Yeah right. Im a tough love kind of girl, while Obama is more of a I’ll give you money and and tell you what you want to hear if you vote for me kind of guy.

 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 16:15:25

“Sometimes you have to have a fake execution to calm down the masses.”

The Congressional inquisition followed by sham financial reform is a standard part of the aftermath of any financial crisis, as detailed in Galbraith’s book, A Short History of Financial Euphoria.

If nothing else, the current happenings in DC give a sense of where we are in the aftermath of the housing bubble.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-04-17 20:42:18

Not that Galbraith in any way opposed regulation- quite the opposite. He was a Keynesian, worked for FDR’s administration, and spent his life warning against oligopolies and the dangers of unfettered capitalism. He accurately foresaw where we are now.

 
 
Comment by CA renter
2010-04-18 03:17:24

Comment by Natalie
2010-04-17 10:27:45
I do agree Matt and others helped blow the lid off the sewer, but do you ever wonder if the government’s response is the minimum amount that can be done while still making it look like they are really trying to do something about the problem at a time most convenient for them. I do.

————————–

Totally agree with this.

Again, this is very suspicious to me. They are trying to divert our attention away from what really matters. The CDOs John Paulson was involved with were late in the game. These are NOT the instruments that “caused the financial crisis,” but they will try to frame them as such. They are trying to make it look like short-sellers are responsible for the financial crisis vs. them responding to conditions that they though would cause a financial crisis.

The securities behind the “crisis” were being written long before John Paulson entered the picture.

Not saying that this case doesn’t have any merits. It does. But I’m very suspicious of the direction it seems to be going and the message they are trying to get out (short-sellers caused the crisis).

This might be used as the impetus to ban short selling again…perhaps they are trying to get in front of something because they believe we are in for another downturn????

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 14:14:10

Sammy, 7 (or is it now only 5?) corporations control almost 90% of MSM in this country.

 
 
 
Comment by Martin
2010-04-17 06:33:05

Looks like emerging market stocks will go down by 3-4% Monday on Goldman news and other charges that are awaited.

Comment by palmetto
2010-04-17 06:39:59

Don’t forget the Iceland volcano. Last night on the local news one of the anchors said the airlines were losing $200 million A DAY! I don’t know how they come up with these figures, but if that volcano keeps spewing for a while, European air transport is at pretty much of a standstill, no?

I think this summer will be much cooler in Europe than predicted.

Comment by Carlos4
2010-04-17 06:47:06

Shutting down of Nigeria’s major offshore oil field yesterday couldnt possibly be because of a glut of oil, could it? Certainly not at $85 a barrel! Maybe they fly in oil to England.

Comment by palmetto
2010-04-17 06:58:01

Good catch, Carlos. According to the story, they’re doing “equipment repairs” and trying to calm unrest in the Niger Delta. LOL. Boatloads of jet fuel are lying dormant and unspent, so something’s gotta compensate and keep those oil prices up, right? Coinkydink? Yeah, riiiiight…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Spokaneman
2010-04-17 13:48:56

They’ve run out of tankers to store the oil in.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-04-17 13:53:45

lol

 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 14:17:07

I know a few people who work in the oil filed who have been to Nigeria several times.

To say that country is FUBAR would be putting it politely. And that’s no exaggeration.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 16:09:16

Would it be fair to say Nigeria is Zimbabwefied or perhaps Sudanated? Or would that be overstatement?

 
Comment by pmseatac
2010-04-17 17:14:17

I worked on a drilling rig near Port Harcourt in the mid 1980s and it was FUBAR’d even back then. We would fly British Caledonian to Lagos, and then to Port Harcourt in the oil company’s private plane. The oil company considered it too dangerous for us to even step briefly into the airport without guards; they would meet us at the international flight in Lagos, hustle us directly to their own plane, fly us to Port Harcourt, march us to a helicopter and fly us to the work site. In those days the company I worked for paid huge bonuses (for the time) to anyone who would volunteer to work in Nigeria, Zaire, or Colombia.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 19:24:32

Nigeria is in a class by itself.

 
 
 
Comment by Ki
2010-04-17 06:47:25

It’s not $200M a day. It’s lazy MSM reporting. They probably looked at airline revenues for the year, divided by 365 and got $200M, and therefore no flights = $200M lost in revenue. What they forgot to say was, pilots get paid for hours they fly, so no flights = no pay. Jets on the ground = no fuel costs. No costs for peanuts on flights and so on.

And it’s not like this stuff doesn’t happen ever. Every winter there are big storms that shut down travel for a few days in parts of the country. And every time this happens, the MSM acts like it has never happened before and it’s the end of days.

Comment by combotechie
2010-04-17 07:05:27

The WSJ says $200 million in lost revenue because 16,000 of Europe’s 28,000 daily flights have been cancelled.

$200 million divided by 16,000 cancellations equals $1,250 per cancellation.

$1,250 seems a bit pricy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ol'Bubba
2010-04-17 07:40:34

$200 million/16,000 = $12,500 per flight cancellation.

Combo- I think you need another cup of coffee :)

 
Comment by combotechie
2010-04-17 08:00:02

Ooops.

 
Comment by scdave
2010-04-17 08:43:26

I hope you don’t manage your cash with that same calculator combo… :)

 
Comment by rms
2010-04-17 10:53:42

“$1,250 seems a bit pricy.”

Don’t forget that “bagel-n-coffee” while waiting to board.

 
Comment by SV guy
2010-04-17 14:00:59

“I hope you don’t manage your cash with that same calculator combo…”

:)

 
 
Comment by Ncinerate
2010-04-17 08:20:28

Funny enough, last time that same icelandic volcano blew it’s top it erupted and gassed the sky for two years.

That was in the 1800’s when nothing was in the`1. Imagine for a moment a volcano shutting down air transport in and out of the UK for -years-.

Doubt it’ll happen, but on the geologic scale of things it’s not impossible.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by pressboardbox
2010-04-17 08:44:41

How much a day did it cost the airlines back in the 1800s? Can you adust the figure for inflation?

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 14:18:48

:lol:

 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 07:03:53

Global cooling is a likely result of major volcanic eruptions. Not sure why this is on topic, though…are you suggesting the volcanic eruption will somehow precipitate falling prices on Wall Street? Seems about as likely as the theory that shorter skirt lengths are good for Wall Street share prices.

Comment by palmetto
2010-04-17 07:11:14

“are you suggesting the volcanic eruption will somehow precipitate falling prices on Wall Street?”

I’m hoping it will put an end to any chance of crap and trade and other such “global warming” financial machinations.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Blue Skye
2010-04-17 07:29:42

More CO2 is being belched by that volcano than would have been by the airline flights that are cancelled. Cap that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-04-17 07:42:52

The Mt. St. Helens eruption in 1980 was the blame for El Nino in 1981 or 1982. That meant a lot more rainfall and slightly warmer temperatures.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by MrBubble
2010-04-17 07:52:52

Krakatoa in 1883 lowered global average temps by 1.2 the next year and Mt Tambora in 1815 caused ‘the year without a summer (ave temp down by up to a degree). Caused by SO2 into the stratosphere causing short-lived cooling. Mt St Helens and El Nino? That’s not how ENSO works.

 
Comment by pressboardbox
2010-04-17 09:00:58

When the earth farts, people listen.

 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-04-17 13:17:29

That fine ash plays hell with engines and sensitive technology. The long-term costs of this are going to be monumental. Yet another strike against Wall Streets “extend and pretend” low-volume suckers rally.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-04-17 14:00:52

I dunno. If Europe has to replace a ton of stuff, won’t that help us? (Assuming we still produce anything.)

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 06:57:00

Oh come on. Don’t you realize there is a Plunge Protection Team waiting in the wings to buoy up share prices the moment a crisis erupts?

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 07:01:30

Oops … what if Gollum is part of The Team?

Here is my “most likely” scenario for how this plays out. The SEC is now barking furiously at Megabank Inc to lend political support to the need for financial reform. This action is predicated on the presumption that a strong recovery is underway. Megabank, Inc’s best response is to precipitate a crash in Wall Street share prices, which would signal the economy is too weak to risk reforming The Street just yet.

Watch for it, folks!

Comment by scdave
2010-04-17 08:52:32

Interesting thought Pbear and I have little doubt that they can make that happen if they want to…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Natalie
2010-04-17 08:57:04

Read above. The Obama team is corrupt. Of course this is an entirely controlled and premeditated event. Everything the administration does is an effort shift populace sentiment and manipulate others in the name of greed and evil.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by BlueStar
2010-04-17 11:47:13

You are the one being manipulated. Did you know that the Obama admin. has appointed over 5000 people since he was elected and only 25 were former lobbyist?
So says the Jedi master:
“These are not the droids you are looking for.”

Focus your rage on campaign financing and the lobbyist and make them as unpopular as Al Quida and the politicians will turn back to doing the people’s business.

 
Comment by BlueStar
2010-04-17 12:05:51

Correction, Obama has appointed only 2,900, not 5,000.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-04-05-ethics_N.htm

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 14:29:26

Good find BlueStar.

I’m getting pretty tired of hearing people complain that the Pres isn’t doing enough when he has been in office just a little over ONE YEAR and was left with a mess, a mess bigger than just the F.I.R.E. mafia crap, that took almost 10 years to make.

Even though I didn’t like Bush Jr., I at least gave him a chance in his first year.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 15:17:04

Good find BlueStar.

 
Comment by Natalie
2010-04-17 15:38:55

I am not partisan BlueStar. I actually had more problems with the Bush admin. My attacks are based soley on actions of individuals. Do I mention the Obama admin more than others? Of course, they are in charge.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Kim
2010-04-17 07:42:37

“Looks like emerging market stocks will go down by 3-4% Monday on Goldman news and other charges that are awaited.”

Who knows? Asian futures on Sunday night should be fun to watch. Then again, will McDonalds sell fewer hamburgers this weekend than last weekend because Goldman Sachs was outed yesterday? Probably not.

Comment by arizonadude
2010-04-17 07:58:51

I wouldnt be surprised if the market actually was up monday due to better than expected economic data.

Everything is better than expected right now.Its party time baby!!!!!!!!!!!

Save a house, ride a banker?

Comment by Weed Wacker
2010-04-17 18:03:14

As I understand it, GS is only being charged to pay back the profits on $1B of investments. A pittance even if they lose.

I’m betting it turns out that GS did nothing wrong in the final verdict, anyway.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by BlueStar
2010-04-17 06:40:02

As the Goldman Sachs news hit the wires yesterday I made a comment about the value of those toxic MBS tracked by Markit. It was one of the only places you could see the actual prices of some those AAA through B tranches. They were priced when issued at near 100 cents on the dollar. At the bottom some had lost 95% of their value. Of course as the FED stepped in and bought hundreds of billions of this stuff at near full value you could see these MBS shoot up in value over the last year. So when the SHTF yesterday I was interested to see if there was any effect on these indexes. Well the answer is yes, sort of.

http://www.markit.com/en/products/data/indices/structured-finance-indices/abx/abx-prices.page?

If you check out a few of these you will see the AAA rated stuff did indeed take a hit yesterday but the effect was pretty minor. If the GS fraud can be linked to the rating agencies we should expect lots of fireworks in these indexes.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 09:24:27

“If the GS fraud can be linked to the rating agencies we should expect lots of fireworks in these indexes.”

Is there any chance that some kind of independent (of the Fed / Treasury Department) investigation could be conducted to probe the extend of Gollum’s fraud. The way it looks to this American voter is that the tendrils of Wall Street corruption are so deeply imbedded in DC that some kind of fully independent investigation is warranted to get to the bottom of this and root out the crooks. The Fed is not up to the task.

Comment by BlueStar
2010-04-17 11:54:16

In the end I bet it’s the foreign markets that bring the hammer down on our own rating agencies. Moodys, S&P are all embedded in our government so it’s like asking a doctor to perform brain surgery on himself.

Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 15:19:12

It will have to be. All the ratings agencies were in collusion on all those “AAA” rate securities that turned out to be the “weapons of financial destruction” (to quote Mr. Buffet).

And you can bet those foreign bankers aren’t real happy about that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-04-17 06:46:47

The Fire Next Time NYT

Now, Mr. McConnell surely isn’t sincere; while pretending to oppose bank bailouts, he’s actually doing the bankers’ bidding. But before I get to that, let’s talk about why he’s wrong on substance.

Well, Mr. McConnell is trying. His talking points come straight out of a memo Frank Luntz, the Republican political consultant, circulated in January on how to oppose financial reform. “Frankly,” wrote Mr. Luntz, “the single best way to kill any legislation is to link it to the Big Bank Bailout.” And Mr. McConnell is following those stage directions.

It’s a truly shameless performance: Mr. McConnell is pretending to stand up for taxpayers against Wall Street while in fact doing just the opposite. In recent weeks, he and other Republican leaders have held meetings with Wall Street executives and lobbyists, in which the G.O.P. and the financial industry have sought to coordinate their political strategy.

And let me assure you, Wall Street isn’t lobbying to prevent future bank bailouts. If anything, it’s trying to ensure that there will be more bailouts. By depriving regulators of the tools they need to seize failing financial firms, financial lobbyists increase the chances that when the next crisis strikes, taxpayers will end up paying a ransom to stockholders and executives as the price of avoiding collapse.

Even more important, however, the financial industry wants to avoid serious regulation; it wants to be left free to engage in the same behavior that created this crisis. It’s worth remembering that between the 1930s and the 1980s, there weren’t any really big financial bailouts, because strong regulation kept most banks out of trouble. It was only with Reagan-era deregulation that big bank disasters re-emerged. In fact, relative to the size of the economy, the taxpayer costs of the savings and loan disaster, which unfolded in the Reagan years, were much higher than anything likely to happen under President Obama.

The Obama administration wants tighter regulation of derivatives, while Republicans are opposed. And that tells you everything you need to know.

So don’t be fooled. When Mitch McConnell denounces big bank bailouts, what he’s really trying to do is give the bankers everything they want.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/16/opinion/16krugman.html?src=me&ref=general

Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-04-17 12:59:36

As this whole thing continues to play out, it will become more and more apparent that the moral relativism used by many here that says since neither party is perfect, both are equally corrupt, will be shown to be a crock. McConnell’s pitiful attempt to pretend this is a bailout bill is patently absurd to anyone who’s not wearing partisan blinders. He’s defending the big boyz of Wall Street- plain and simp. That’s what the Republican party does. It’s their raison d’etre. All else is window dressing. (Very much including their ‘free market’ bullcrap. The last thing their overlords want is a free market.)

Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 15:21:53

The last thing the overlards want is transparent and fair markets.

And yes, the Dems aren’t perfect and never will be, but the Repubs are pure evil.

 
Comment by Ki
2010-04-17 16:34:43

Wall St donated more to Dems than Reps consistently yet the Reps are the party of Wall St. Odd don’t you think?

Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 19:31:01

It would be if campaign donations were all there was to it.

Ever hear of K Street? Insider trading? “Deregulation?” Looking the other way? Direct order to ignore the most egregious rules and regs violations? No bid contracts?

That’s the Repubs.

The Dems do it as well, just not as much and they at least TRY to give J6P a token or 2. The Repubs attitude to J6P is “f’ off, I got mine.”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 06:54:14

Wouldn’t more panic be useful if it led to substantive Wall Street reform? I don’t know about you guys, but I don’t want my kids to suffer from a never-ending period of American economic decline while Wall Street banksters continue collecting their pirate loot.

More Than Goldman Sachs In SEC Gun Sight
Robert Lenzner, 04.16.10, 06:49 PM EDT
Other people should be worried, too, and they know who they are.

The chickens may have come home to roost for Goldman Sachs and perhaps for a host of other purveyors of rotten mortgage-backed securities that were fobbed off on unsuspecting investors.

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s enforcement chief revealed Friday that his investigators were looking at “other products and practices” on Wall Street that might also lead to eventual fraud charges for others. In the meantime, be aware that the government is seeking the disgorgement of illegal profits Goldman Sachs ( GS - news - people ) obtained as a “result of fraudulent misconduct.”

Last but not least, the U.S. Attorney in New York, had “no comment’ when asked if the Justice Department had in the works a criminal investigation of this civil fraud action by the SEC. In the present climate of anger toward Wall Street you can probably count on a criminal investigation. Justice recently divulged it was looking into accusations that Lehman Bros. hid massive debts from investors just before it went bankrupt.

Truthfully, any indictment is unlikely as it would threaten Goldman’s charter as a dealer of Treasury securities and throw the financial community back into panic.

Comment by James
2010-04-17 08:53:12

Are we better off with a civil charge? We can probably have both but you can’t use the 5th in civil charges. Anytime you get good lawyers involved these days civil seems to be the way to go.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 09:13:25

I’m thinking the Obamanites are keeping the criminal fraud charges on reserve in case the banksters keep trying to block financial reform. Given the levels of real estate related local fraud and corruption that we have documented on this board over the past five years, I can’t imagine it would be difficult to find instances of criminal fraud under the lid of Megabank, Inc with a little bit of effort.

This is a key reason that the bubble-blind Fed should be stripped of its financial oversight role. Whoever is put in charge of future banking regulation needs to have good eyesight.

 
Comment by goirishgohoosiers
2010-04-17 09:26:17

Defendants in civil cases can and do invoke the 5th in their testimony. The only way to compel incriminating testimony is for the government to grant use or transactional immunity.

 
 
 
Comment by Kim
2010-04-17 07:59:24

100,000 Califonians to lose unemployment bennies this weekend…

ouch.

www dot kcba dot com/Global/story.asp?S=12327329

Comment by pressboardbox
2010-04-17 08:59:19

There might be those lost BigMacs that were mentioned by PB above.

Comment by Kim
2010-04-17 09:52:53

I mentioned the hamburgers. Looks like even the dollar menu suddenly became expensive in Cali.

 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-04-17 08:14:13

http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/banking-financial-institutions/92775-hedge-fund-manager-at-center-of-goldman-allegations-is-a-major-democratic-donor-

The hedge fund manager at the center of the Goldman Sachs allegations is a major Democratic donor. I am shocked, shocked! I tell you.

Comment by 2banana
2010-04-17 08:59:26

It was all about hope and change - and boy did it work out for a select few…

 
Comment by mrktMaven FL
2010-04-17 10:12:58

Apart from campaign contributions, I would really like to learn which politicians had their money in Paulson’s hedge fund or other hedge funds betting against the housing market.

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-04-17 13:08:17

The hedge fund manager at the center of the Goldman Sachs allegations is a major Democratic donor.

He’s also a major Republican donor, but somehow you neglect to mention that. Like all the big boyz of Wall Street, he funnels money to both parties.

Don’t forget, there’s one party that champions campaign finance reform, and another party that continually stands in its way. Could that have any pertinence here?

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-04-17 13:21:30

Both parties are sleazy errand-boys for Wall Street.

Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-04-17 14:07:11

Because they’re beholden to the money. And the money is there because the Republicans consistently, and successfully, fight against any and all campaign finance reform.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 15:26:20

The Dems may sleazy errand boys, but the Repubs are their prison b!thches.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by BlueStar
2010-04-17 08:45:19

Lots of bank failures this weekend. I noticed FDIC was cutting more 50/50 deals on asset losses making the acquiring banks cover the difference.

Direct evidence here?

“Lure of easy real-estate money sinks couple”

http://www.ajc.com/business/lure-of-easy-real-467220.html

“These days, a single two-bedroom cabin in Ellijay is all that remains of a real estate empire the Ballards once thought would be worth about $30 million. Now bankrupt, her husband, Doug, has returned to work in Florida. “

Comment by pressboardbox
2010-04-17 09:03:35

The high number of bank failures might be for dramatic effect to go with the SEC news for political consideration regarding bank reform legislation. They all do work for the same (corrupt) team.

 
Comment by 2banana
2010-04-17 09:06:52

Over the next year, Ballard moved more business to Appalachian. But as the loans came up for renewal, the bank demanded she “cross-collateralize” all the deals with her other business and personal properties. Previously she had avoided such guarantees by putting 25 percent down on each project.

Even the banks knew it was coming to an end shortly…

It was only later, she said, that she heard rumors that some of Appalachian’s officers had acquired foreclosed properties at sometimes steep discounts — including the furniture store and a warehouse that had been hers.

Fraud on the way up and on the way down…

 
 
Comment by SUGuy
2010-04-17 09:15:06

What ever happened to James Bond and women melting type of type of traditional thinking?

The newest development is the judgment heaped on men for bad behavior. Women’s judgment of adultery and promiscuity in men has become far harsher, according to recent studies. The shift in attitude could be interpreted as a feminist advance. Women now hold men to the same stringent sexual standards that they themselves have long been held to. Even men are beginning to judge other men for promiscuity. What this points to is the end of a great American tradition: the double standard.

http://www.slate.com/id/2250706/

Comment by 2banana
2010-04-17 09:23:58

The prevailing cultural assumption has been that women are judged more harshly for overly sexual behavior than men are—women who sleep around are “sluts,” while men who get around are “studs.” But this perception has been shifting for at least a decade among women. According to a 1999 study of Canadian female grad students published in the Journal of Sex Research, “Contrary to the double standard, the vast majority of women listed only negative words to describe either a man or woman who has had many partners.” They often labeled experienced men as “manipulative” and “exploitative,” and said they would warn their girlfriends not to date a man who had slept with 10 or more partners. This was years before Web sites like dontdatehimgirl.com made this kind of warning viral.

Except, of course, if you are Clinton in the White House…

Comment by SanFranciscoBayAreaGal
2010-04-17 14:55:09

Don’t forget to add Vitner, Ensign, Gingrich, Kennedy, etc.. the beat goes on

 
 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-04-17 10:51:43

At the same time the Marriage 2.0 is in full swing as a war against men. The advantage of being single and alone for a male outweigh the advantages of getting married. Particularly in a state where it’s “no fault” divorce and common property.

You want a friend, get a dog. You want intimacy, go to Canada where you can legally buy it.

Surveys show more and more men are afraid of bad marriages and that’s what keeps them single.

I’ve worked coast to coast and encountered colleagues who have been devastated by divorce.

Comment by Kim
2010-04-17 14:22:45

“Surveys show more and more men are afraid of bad marriages and that’s what keeps them single.”

Link?

I think this may be true, but not only for men. A young person today can’t look at our culture with its 50% divorce rate and not be scared to get married. Same with the decision to have children (few people set out with the goal to be a single parent).

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-04-17 14:29:51

Google “fear of bad marriage”

Here’s a link

http://tinyurl.com/y5q25rt

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-04-17 14:48:13

You want a friend, get a dog. You want intimacy, go to Canada where you can legally buy it.

You’re such a romantic, Bill. I bet you make the ladies swoon.

On the common property point- How clueless was Larry King? He marries his umpteenth wife, doesn’t get a pre-nup, lives in common -property Cali, and gets busted banging his wife’s hot little sister? He got set up and shut down. Played for an old fool, to the tune of about 70 million dollars.

Comment by Carl Morris
2010-04-17 14:56:31

Wow, 35 million for each of them assuming they split it 50/50.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-04-17 15:35:48

No, 70 mill is her half- he’s worth about 140 million.

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2010-04-17 17:19:29

I meant between the two sisters :-).

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-04-17 20:20:49

lol- good point (I wonder if the sisters signed a ‘post-nup’, agreeing how to split Larry’s money)

 
Comment by Carl Morris
2010-04-17 20:50:11

I just thought they might have planned it together from the beginning.

 
 
 
Comment by Ki
2010-04-17 16:41:36

“I’ve worked coast to coast and encountered colleagues who have been devastated by divorce.”

And you’ve encountered no colleagues that were happily married?

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-04-17 17:08:46

Interesting question: I imagine there are some happily married, but they mostly don’t talk about it. I can guarantee I would be divorced within two years of getting married. I cannot stand compromise. And no, my parents were not rotten. They were the best parents in the world!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by combotechie
2010-04-17 18:22:23

“I imagine there are some happily married, but they mostly don’t talk about it.”

What’s there to say? If one is happily married then his/her happiness speaks for itself.

 
Comment by CA renter
2010-04-18 03:36:29

Bill,

Have you never met anyone who was devastated by being single?

Every single man I’ve known who committed suicide was either single or about to become single. Coincidence?

 
Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-04-18 12:42:43

I met one who committed suicide. He was single. But his brother committed suicide a few years before. This happened on that guy’s 35th birthday.

On a happy note, the health advantages of marriage on men are just about gone, versus single men: Here’s the URL.

http://www.spring.org.uk/2008/09/mens-health-boost-from-marriage.php

 
 
 
 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-04-17 13:22:47

And this is related to housing how?

Comment by Kim
2010-04-17 14:23:57

Its a bits bucket?

Comment by Bill in Los Angeles
2010-04-17 16:00:38

Yup. It’s a bits bucket.

I keep having to remind nabobs the line at the very top:

“Post off-topic ideas, links and Craigslist finds here…”

Emphasis mine.

When Ben changes the policy I will stay on topic.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 15:46:19

This is over the top. Several studies have shown that women cheat more often than men. (60% vs 50%)

Yes, you can google it and they were done by very respected universities.

And yes, in a country that heavily favors women in divorce, what guy in his right mind would ever get married?

Comment by mikeinbend
2010-04-17 22:33:48

BiLA
you remind me of professional flier and firer in the movie, Up in the Air. Guy played by Clooney flew 10 million miles, preaching elimination of emotional baggage caused by relationships. Only to be reminded that getting married was better than dying alone, and being alone-ly sucks. You can’t buy intimacy, even in Canada. That is absurd. Watch it and see if you see yourself. We ain’t got alot of money, but…
My wife rocks!

 
 
Comment by RioAmericanInBrasil
2010-04-18 15:27:01

What ever happened to James Bond and women melting type of type of traditional thinking?

I guess you’d have to head south for that kinda thing.

 
 
Comment by 2banana
2010-04-17 09:19:04

Obama and the dems - raising OUR taxes through the roof but giving tax breaks to foreigners????

—————

U.S. government mulls luring foreign property owners(tax break 4 foreign CRE buyers)
Reuters | 04/16/10 | Ilaina Jonas

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Tax breaks may not be enough of a sweetener to bring foreign buyers back into the flailing U.S. commercial real estate market, where falling rents, rising vacancies, a scarcity of debt financing and lack of property for sale have acted as deterrents.

Congress is considering a move to lower or eliminate U.S. taxes currently imposed on foreign investors of U.S. commercial real estate, where the number of sales has fallen off a cliff over the past two years.

The Real Estate Revitalization Act of 2010 is designed to stir demand by foreigners and in turn lift prices and encourage even more buying by alleviating the U.S. tax burden imposed upon foreign sellers. The number of commercial property deals fell by 55 percent in 2009 after diving 62 percent the previous year.

Yet many current owners are hanging on to their property despite values that are often less than the mortgages because lenders are extending the loans rather than take the loss from a foreclosure.

But if lawmakers hope that rejigging the tax laws for foreign sellers will suffice to kick-start the U.S. commercial property market, they may be in for a letdown.

Both foreign and U.S. investors are keeping a massive amount of money parked on the sidelines. They are spooked not by taxes but by falling rents, rising vacancies and a lack of debt financing. There is also a dearth of well-leased, financially stable office, retail, hotel apartment or warehouse buildings for sale.

Comment by CA renter
2010-04-18 03:39:57

God forbid **Americans** own real estate in our own country. Nope, gotta make sure the foreigners own EVERYTHING here.

(Sorry for the rant, but a little bothered by the fact that prices in our neck of the woods are not going down, and there are massive numbers of foreigners buying up all our overpriced housing.)

 
 
Comment by SUGuy
2010-04-17 09:24:41

Recession, Recovery… Remodeling

It’s hard to tell whether the LIRA signals a broader economic recovery. It may be that people who can’t sell their homes are deciding that, if they have to stay put, they might as well renovate. If that’s the case, now may be the time to start that renovation project you’ve been putting off — well before the good contractors start getting booked.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/04/recession-recovery-remodeling/39029/

Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 15:47:40

It could signal the Second Coming, but unless Main St. starts seeing improvement, it doesn’t mean squat.

 
Comment by Ki
2010-04-17 16:44:02

Friend of mine recently painted the whole house inside and out and replaced most of the carpet with hardwood/tile. He knows he has no hope of selling his house without taking a big loss any time soon. So he figured if he’ll be there for a while, might as well make it look good.

 
 
Comment by Muggy
2010-04-17 09:34:50

Interesting development in our short sale (that is pending). A smaller house, not upgraded, is now pending too. It was listed at $255k but is not a short sale. Our realtor thinks we’re screwed if this closes quickly and is anywhere near asking. The bank still hasn’t ordered a BPO, which will obviously be different with this new comp. BofA would then try to jack us, at which point we’d bail.

My street-level observation is that the dead cat bounce / mini me bubble is at about 2006 right now. We should be into 2007 about 3-4 months after the credit expiration. There will be a SERIOUS reckoning for anyone that listed their house in the last 6 months and received no offers before the credit expired.

Comment by Green Shoots
2010-04-17 09:45:44

There has never been a better time to buy a short sale!

Comment by Muggy
2010-04-17 18:34:47

“There has never been a better time to buy a short sale!”

Seriously. I am willing to move on. You?

Comment by CA renter
2010-04-18 03:41:36

I wish you luck, Muggy.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mikeinbend
2010-04-18 07:23:32

Sorry to hear you have to work with BofA. Hope they take your offer much to their chagrin, not yours. But if it don’t happen, you could easily move somewhere, which may be exciting and rewarding for you. We have a brand new rental house in a very safe nabe, for rent; $825/mo. And we bought our short sale from US Bank. They were quick to respond and took 16% off asking price. Interviewing two possible tenants today. In three years we plan to live in it to have our kids go to high school there (they are in a k-8, no middle school for them, we hope). Are you responding to GS as if he is PB?

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 09:35:23

Wake up, America, and read the handwriting on the wall. The Greek future can be our future if we do not drum the high-level Wall Street Megabank corruption out and start over with a transparent and competitive financial system subject to a rule of law. Crony capitalism and too-big-to-fail have to go.

Note that having a Treasury Secretary (aka Chief IRS official) who came into office under the cloud of a tax scandal hardly offers encouragement for ordinary Americans to pay their taxes. Crony capitalism is US.

My wife and I foolishly try to pay every penny that we owe. Like Greek citizens who play the rules, I know that I am a fool and I am proud of it.

* THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
* ECONOMY
* APRIL 15, 2010

Tragic Flaw: Graft Feeds Greek Crisis

By MARCUS WALKER

ATHENS—Behind the budget crisis roiling Greece lies a riddle: Why does the state spend so lavishly but collect taxes so poorly? Many Greeks say the answer needs only two words: fakelaki and rousfeti.

Fakelaki is the Greek for “little envelopes,” the bribes that affect everyone from hospital patients to fishmongers. Rousfeti means expensive political favors, which pervade everything from hiring teachers to property deals with Greek Orthodox monks. Together, these traditions of corruption and cronyism have produced a state that is both bloated and malnourished, and a crisis of confidence that is shaking all of Europe.

A study to be published in coming weeks by the Washington-based Brookings Institution finds that bribery, patronage and other public corruption are major contributors to the country’s ballooning debt, depriving the Greek state each year of the equivalent of at least 8% of its gross domestic product, or more than €20 billion (about $27 billion).

“Our basic problem is systemic corruption,” Greece’s Prime Minister George Papandreou said after he took office late last year, vowing to change a mentality that views the republic as a resource to plunder. He later berated the chief of public prosecutions, saying Greeks believe “there is impunity in this country.” The chief prosecutor said that wasn’t so.

Greece moved closer to a bailout Thursday, requesting aid talks with the International Monetary Fund and the European Union. Many investors and economists say aid would buy Greece time, but wouldn’t solve its underlying problems.

The Brookings study, which examines the correlation between corruption indicators and fiscal deficits across 40 developed or nearly developed economies, highlights how corruption has hurt public finances in parts of Europe, especially in Greece and Italy, and to a lesser extent in Spain and Portugal.

Corruption undermines public finances in myriad ways. Cheating the government, especially on taxes, is widespread. Government-procurement bribery and political patronage bloat government spending. And pervasive petty bribery erodes the state’s authority over taxpayers.

The core of the problem is that we don’t have a culture of civic society,” says Stavros Katsios, a professor at Greece’s Ionian University who specializes in economic crime. “In Greece, complying with the rules is a matter of dishonor. They call you stupid if you follow the rules.

Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 09:42:52

Tim Geithner: Too Close to Goldman Sachs to Be Treasury Secretary, Critic Says
Posted Jan 21, 2009 12:22pm EST

Beyond his tax gaffe, which will mainly serve to politically weaken Obama’s pick, Whalen says Geithner is the wrong many for the job because of his decision-making as President of the New York Fed.

“I believe Tim Geithner only represents part of Wall Street - Goldman Sachs,” he says, suggesting Goldman was the “primary beneficiary of the AIG bailout” and notes Goldman alum Stephen Friedman serves on the board of the NY Fed. (Hank Paulson and Robert Rubin, with whom Geithner had frequent meetings in the past year, are also Goldman alum.)

 
Comment by alpha-sloth
2010-04-17 13:18:36

The core of the problem is that we don’t have a culture of civic society

This is what I was alluding to the other day when people were high-fiving someone’s tax fraud scheme. Kind of hypocritical to scoff at Greece’s problems while you encourage the same crap here. Oh, that’s right- it’s different when you cheat on taxes for patriotic reasons. That makes it all right.

 
Comment by ecofeco
2010-04-17 15:49:07

Uh, remember that article last week about local governments caught in exactly the same predicament for exactly the same reasons?

Future? We’re there NOW.

Comment by CA renter
2010-04-18 03:46:33

Yes, and once corruption really sets in, there is no getting it out.

This is one of the main reasons I opposed all the bailouts. You could literally see the wheels turning in the scammers’ minds as each bailout was launched. From bankers to borrowers, and everyone in between…the whole system is designed to reward scammers at the expense of those who try to live by the rules.

So much fruad is out there in the RE market, I wonder if we’ll ever see a “normal” market again.

Comment by Pondering the Mess
2010-04-18 09:49:17

I seriously doubt we will.

The rot has set in, and there’s no way to clean it out. People these days are looking for the next scam - we can’t have a normal market with that mindset. And when honest people try to compete for housing against crooks with toxic loans, the honest people will not end up with the houses.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 09:44:28

Posts by Aaron Task

“Rotten to the Core”:
Bill Black and Barry Ritholtz React to Goldman Fraud Charges

Comment by elvismcduf
2010-04-17 09:56:22

“Think about the timing of this. It comes just as I have been talking about a “triggering event” that will take the blame for turning the markets. This suit was reported AFTER the open on OPTIONS EXPIRATION day. Why now? My suspicious mind says that it was timed to allow the options sellers and contract speculators to walk away and to instill maximum damage on the retail buyers of the ALL TIME RECORD number of option call buyers who were in the market just yesterday!!”

http://www.goldmansachs666.com/

Comment by BlueStar
2010-04-17 12:48:26

Statistical records are only kept to be broken, be it finance or climate etc.. Sometimes I think the only important statistic is the number zero, as when you define the total population of living DoDo birds or the odds I will be immortal.

 
 
 
Comment by roger
2010-04-17 10:46:31

I miss Georgous George with his Gold plated Georgie Pins he handed out to the audience.

 
Comment by basura
2010-04-17 11:27:33

“You have a mandate that’s accessible in theory, but not in practice, because it’s too expensive”

Will BOcare be any different?

wwwnytimescom/2010/04/18/nyregion/18insure.html

The problem stems in part from the state’s high medical costs and in part from its stringent requirements on insurance companies in the individual and small group market. In 1993, motivated by stories of suffering AIDS patients, the state became one of the first to require insurers to extend individual or small group coverage to anyone with pre-existing illnesses.

New York also became one of the few states that require insurers within each region of the state to charge the same rates for the same benefits, regardless of whether people are old or young, male or female, smokers or nonsmokers, high risk or low risk.

Healthy people, in effect, began to subsidize people who needed more health care. The healthier customers soon discovered that the high premiums were not worth it and dropped out of the plans. The pool of insured people shrank to the point where most of them had high health care needs. Without healthier people to spread the risk, their premiums skyrocketed, a phenomenon known in the trade as the “adverse selection death spiral.”

“You have a mandate that’s accessible in theory, but not in practice, because it’s too expensive,” said Mark P. Scherzer, a consumer lawyer and counsel to New Yorkers for Accessible Health Coverage, an advocacy group

 
Comment by seen it all
2010-04-17 11:32:20

According to the cover of Newsweek

“AMERICA’S BACK”

i guess once this Goldman Sachs dust up blows over the market can resume its ascent.

Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-04-17 13:27:32

NEWSPEAK is arguably among the worst of our politically-correct, corporate shill truth-makers. Why anyone would pay a subscription price for this propaganda is beyond me.

 
 
Comment by Professor Bear
2010-04-17 16:19:07

I am going to post a couple of old chestnuts which might be good to revisit on this weekend after Gollum got served notice by the SEC of a fraud suit.

Economy
May 2009 ATLANTIC MAGAZINE
The Quiet Coup
By Simon Johnson

The crash has laid bare many unpleasant truths about the United States. One of the most alarming, says a former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund, is that the finance industry has effectively captured our government—a state of affairs that more typically describes emerging markets, and is at the center of many emerging-market crises. If the IMF’s staff could speak freely about the U.S., it would tell us what it tells all countries in this situation: recovery will fail unless we break the financial oligarchy that is blocking essential reform. And if we are to prevent a true depression, we’re running out of time.

 
Comment by Sammy Schadenfreude
2010-04-18 13:40:17

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/7604196/No-prospect-of-any-more-German-rescues-as-Portugal-hits-a-brick-wall.html

Just when we’re finding out the Greek debt crisis is not so contained, the Portugal debt crisis rears its ugly head. Soon to be followed by the Spanish debt crisis, the British debt crisis, the Ireland debt crisis, etc. All of which will barely rate any but the most dismissive mention by the MSM.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post